HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-06-04 P & Z Packet
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEETING AGENDA
Tuesday, June 4, 2024
6:30 p.m.
Meeting Live Streamed at:
https://northmetrotv.com/centerville-stream/
MEETING (6:30 PM)
I. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS (6:30 PM or shortly thereafter)
1. Chapter 157: Erosion Control - Minimum Control Measures (MCM) Ordinance to be in
compliance with Construction Stormwater Requirements for Erosion, Sediment, and
Waste Controls.
V. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, APPEARANCES
1. None
VI. OLD BUSINESS
1. LaLonde First Addition
a. Preliminary Plat
b. Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development
VII. NEW BUSINESS
1. 2010 Fairview Street - Use Review Î Caliber Collision (Auto Glass Replacement/Repair)
2. Chapter 157: Erosion Control - Minimum Control Measures (MCM) Ordinance to be in
compliance with Construction Stormwater Requirements for Erosion, Sediment, and
Waste Controls.
VIII. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. May 7, 2024, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
IX. ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES
1. Council Member Liaison
2. AdministratorÓs Report
X. ADJOURNMENT
INFORMATION
None
CITY OF CENTERVILLEREQUEST
FOR ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: RequestedMeetingDate:
June 4, 2024
Planning and Zoning
IV.1
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Public Hearing - Language Amendments to City Code, Chapter 157: Erosion Control
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
The City of Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission will hold a Public Hearing to consider language
amendments to City Code, Chapter 157: Erosion Control. The purpose of the meeting is to obtain public input
regarding proposed language modification to comply with the new requirements in Minimum Control
Measure 4 (MCM4) and Minimum Control Measure 5 (MCM5) as part of the CityÓs Municipal
Separate Storm Sewer (MS4) permit.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
N/A
REQUESTED ACTION:
The chair may open the public hearing, or call for a motion to do so.
Take public input.
Motion to close the public hearing.
For ClerkÓs Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
Ordinance
Other (specify) ____________
______________________________________________________________
_____
_______________________________________________________________
Refer to: _________________________________
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Consent
Other: ___________________________________
Regular
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
NOTICE OF SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION TO CONSIDER AMENDING LANGUAGE
CONTAINED IN CITY CODE, CHAPTER 157: EROSION CONTROL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City of Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
will be holding a Public Hearing to consider language amendments to City Code, Chapter 157:
Erosion Control. They will meet on June 4, 2024, at 6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter. The
meeting will be held in the Council Chambers of the Centerville City Hall, located at 1880 Main
Street, Centerville, MN 55038. The purpose of the meeting is to obtain public input regarding
proposed language modification to comply with the new requirements in Minimum Control
Measure 4 (MCM4) and Minimum Control Measure 5 (MCM5) as part of the CityÓs Municipal
Separate Storm Sewer (MS4) permit.
You may call City Hall (651) 792-7933 or email mstatz@centervillemn.com or
tbender@centervillemn.com if you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter. A copy
of the proposed amendments will be available for inspection at City Hall and the meeting is open
to the public. If you are unable to attend the Public Hearing, written comments are welcome and
will be accepted until 12:00 p.m. the Friday prior to the meeting date at City Hall or via:
info@centervillemn.com.
In accordance with the Americans With Disability Act, a hearing-impaired individual(s), wishing
to attend the Public Hearing may request a sign language translator by contacting City Hall at
(651) 792-7933 within one week prior to the scheduled public hearing.
Published in the Quad Community Press on May 28, 2024
Teresa Bender, City Clerk
CHAPTER157:EROSIONCONTROL
Section
General
157.01 Intent
157.02 Statutory authorization
157.03 Findings
157.04 Purpose
157.05 Scope and effect
157.06 Definitions
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
157.15 Submittal procedures
157.16 Review process
157.17 Minimum construction site best management practices
157.18 Completion of work
157.19 Enforcement procedures
157.99 Penalty
GENERAL
§157.01 INTENT.
Intent of this chapter is to promote the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the city by
requiring stormwater management practices for construction activity.
Ord. #79, adopted 03/09/2005
§157.02 STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION.
This chapter is adopted pursuant to M.S. §§ 462.351, as amended, for cities and towns and 394.21, as
amended, for counties having a population of less than 300,000 according to the 1950 federal census (1990).
Ord. #79, adopted 03/09/2005
401 |Page
§ 157.03 FINDINGS.
The city hereby finds that uncontrolled land-disturbing activity at construction sites is subject to soil
erosion and other pollutants which enter into receiving water bodies, adversely affecting the public health,
safety and general welfare by impacting water quality.
Ord. #79, adopted 03/09/2005
§ 157.04 PURPOSE.
The purpose of this chapter is to promote, preserve and enhance the natural resources within the city and
protect them from adverse effects occasioned by poorly sited development or incompatible activities by
regulating land-disturbing activities that would have an adverse and potentially irreversible impact on water
quality and environmentally sensitive land; by minimizing conflicts and encouraging proper installation and
maintenance of best management practices (BMPs) for land-disturbing activities; and by requiring detailed
review standards and procedures for land-disturbing activities proposed for those areas, thereby achieving a
balance between development, redevelopment and protection of water quality and natural areas.
Ord. #79, adopted 03/09/2005
§ 157.05 SCOPE AND EFFECT.
(A) Applicability.
(1) Every applicant of a building permit for a new building or addition, subdivision approval, or a
permit to allow land-disturbing activities greater than or equal to one acre, must submit a
stormwater pollution prevention plan to the City Administrator. No building permit, subdivision
approval or permit to allow land-disturbing activities shall be issued until approval of the
stormwater pollution prevention plan or a waiver of the approval requirement has been obtained
in strict conformance with the provisions of this chapter.
(2) The provisions of division (B) of this section apply to all land, public or private.
(B) Exemptions. The provisions of this chapter do not apply to:
(1) Installation of fence, sign, telephone and electric poles and other kinds of posts or poles;
(2) Emergency work to protect life, limb or property; or
(3) Tilling, planting or harvesting of agricultural, horticultural or silvicultural (forestry) crops.
Ord. #79, adopted 03/09/2005
402 |Page
§ 157.06 DEFINITIONS.
(A) When inconsistent with the context, words used in the present tense include the future tense, words in
the plural number include the singular number, and words in the singular number include the plural
number. The word ÐshallÑ is always mandatory and not merely directive.
(B) For the purpose of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly indicates
or requires a different meaning.
APPLICANT. Any person who wishes to obtain a building permit, subdivision approval, or to fill,
excavate or mine more than ten yards of granular material within the city.
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE (BMP). Erosion and sediment control and water quality
management practices that are the most effective and practicable means of controlling, preventing and
minimizing the degradation of surface water, including construction-phasing, minimizing the length of
time soil areas are exposed, prohibitions and other management practices published by state or
designated area-wide planning agencies.
DETENTION FACILITY. A permanent natural or manmade structure, including wetlands, for the
temporary storage of runoff which contains a permanent pool of water.
DISCHARGE. The release, conveyance, channeling, runoff or drainage of stormwater, including
snowmelt, from a construction site.
EXPOSED SOIL AREAS. All areas of the construction site where the vegetation (trees, shrubs, brush,
grasses and the like) or impervious surface has been removed, thus rendering the soil more prone to
erosion. This includes topsoil stockpile areas, borrow areas and disposal areas within the construction
site. It does not include stockpiles or surcharge areas of gravel, concrete or bituminous. Once soil is
exposed it is considered exposed soil, until it meets the definition of final stabilization.
FINAL STABILIZATION. Means that all soil-disturbing activities at the site have been completed,
and that a uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of 75 percent of the cover for unpaved areas
and areas not covered by permanent structures has been established, or equivalent permanent
stabilization measures have been employed. Simply sowing grass is not considered FINAL
STABILIZATION.
LAND-DISTURBING OR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. Any change of the land surface including
removing vegetative cover, excavating, filling, grading and the construction of any structure.
PERSON. Any individual, firm, corporation, partnership, franchise, association or governmental entity.
PUBLIC WATERS. Waters of the state as defined in M.S. § 103G.005, Subd. 15, as it may be amended
from time to time.
403 |Page
RETENTION FACILITY. A permanent natural or manmade structure that provides for the storage of
stormwater runoff by means of a permanent pool of water.
SEDIMENT. Solid matter carried by water, sewage or other liquids.
STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP). A joint stormwater and erosion and
sediment control plan that is a document containing the requirements of this chapter, that when
implemented will decrease soil erosion on a parcel of land and off-site nonpoint pollution.
STRUCTURE. Anything manufactured, constructed or erected which is normally attached to or
positioned on land, including portable structures, earthen structures, roads, parking lots, paved storage
areas, fences and retaining walls.
WATERS OF THE STATE. As defined in M.S. § 115.01, Subdivision 22, as may be amended from
time to time, the term means all streams, lakes, ponds, marshes, watercourses, waterways, wells, springs,
reservoirs, aquifers, irrigation systems, drainage systems and all other bodies or accumulations of water,
surface or underground, natural or artificial, public or private, which are contained within, flow through
or border upon the state or any portion thereof.
WETLANDS. Lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water table is
usually at or near the surface or the land is covered by shallow water. For purposes of this definition,
WETLANDS must have the following three attributes:
(1) Have a predominance of hydric soils;
(2) Are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to
support a prevalence of hydrophytic vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil
conditions; and
(3) Under normal circumstances support a prevalence of this vegetation.
Ord. #79, adopted 03/09/2005
STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
§ 157.15 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES.
(A) Application. An application for the proposed stormwater pollution prevention plan, shall be filed with
two sets of drawings and required information shall be submitted to the City Administrator or designee.
Drawings shall be prepared to a scale appropriate to the site of the project and suitable for the review to
be performed. At a minimum, the scale shall be one inch equals 100 feet.
(B) Financial security and fees. All applications shall be accompanied by a letter of credit, or cash equal to
the required escrow amount and a separate check for administrative fees will be required upon issuance
404 |Page
of the permit. All escrow and fee amounts are determined annually by Council through the cityÓs fee
schedule.
(C) Contents. At a minimum, the stormwater pollution prevention plan shall contain the following
information:
(1) Existing site map. A map of existing site conditions showing the site and immediately adjacent
areas, including:
(a) The name and address of the applicant, the section, township and range, north point, date
and scale of drawing and number of sheets;
(b) Existing topography with a contour interval appropriate to the topography of the land but
in no case having a contour interval greater than two feet;
(c) A delineation of all streams, rivers, public waters and wetlands located on and
immediately adjacent to the site, including depth of water, a description of all vegetation
which may be found in the water, a statement of general water quality and any
classification given to the water body or wetland by the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and/or the United States Army
Corps of Engineers;
(d) Location and dimensions of existing stormwater drainage systems and natural drainage
patterns on and immediately adjacent to the site delineating in which direction and at
what rate stormwater is conveyed from the site, identifying the receiving stream, river,
public water or wetland, and setting forth those areas of the unaltered site where
stormwater collects;
(e) For subdivisions a description of the soils of the site, including a map indicating soil
types of areas to be disturbed as well as a soil report containing information on the
suitability of the soils for the type of development proposed and for the type of sewage
disposal proposed, and describing any remedial steps to be taken by the applicant to
render the soils suitable;
(f) Vegetative cover and clearly delineating any vegetation proposed for removal; and
(g) One-hundred-year floodplain, flood fringes and floodways.
(2) Site construction plan. A site construction plan including;
(a) Boundary lines of all proposed land-disturbing activities;
(b) Locations and dimensions of all temporary soil or dirt stockpiles;
(c) Proposed construction site erosion control measures to meet the minimum BMP
requirements listed in § 155.17 of this chapter; and
405 |Page
(d) Anticipated starting and completion date of each land-disturbing activity including the
installation of construction site erosion control measures needed to meet the requirements
of this chapter.
(3) Plan of final site conditions. A plan of final site conditions on the same scale as the existing site
map showing the site changes including:
(a) Finished grading contours at the same interval as provided above or as required to clearly
indicate the relationship of changes from existing topography and remaining features
with additional submission of an as-built;
(b) A drainage plan of the developed site delineating in which direction and at what rate
stormwater will be conveyed from the site and setting forth the areas of the site where
stormwater will be allowed to collect;
(c) The proposed size, alignments and intended use of any structures to be erected on the
site; and
(d) A clear delineation and tabulation of all areas which shall be paved or surfaced, including
a description of the surfacing material to be used.
(4) Copy of MPCA permit number for discharging stormwater from construction activity (MN
R100001); and
(5) Copy of Rice Creek Watershed permit and submittal information.
Ord. #79, adopted 03/09/2005
§ 157.16 REVIEW PROCESS.
(A) Process. Stormwater pollution prevention plans meeting the requirements of § 155.15 and minimum
BMP requirements of § 155.17 will be reviewed by the City Administrator or designee who may
approve, approve with conditions, or deny the stormwater pollution prevention plan. If the stormwater
pollution prevention plan is part of a large subdivision, the city may require the SWPPP be reviewed by
the City Engineer. Following Planning and Zoning Commission action, the stormwater pollution
prevention plan shall be submitted to the City Council. City Council action on the stormwater pollution
prevention plan must be accomplished within 120 days following the date the application for approval is
filed with the city.
(B) Duration. Approval of a plan submitted under the provisions of this chapter shall expire one year after
the date of approval unless construction has commenced in accordance with the plan. However, if prior
to the expiration of the approval, the applicant makes a written request to the city for an extension of
time to commence construction, setting forth the reason for the requested extension, the city may grant
406 |Page
one extension of not greater than one single year. The city shall make a decision on the extension within
30 days of receipt. Any plan may be revised in the same manner as originally approved.
(C) Conditions. A stormwater pollution prevention plan may be approved subject to compliance with
conditions reasonable and necessary to ensure that the requirements contained in this chapter are met.
The conditions may limit the size, kind or character of the proposed development, require replacement
of vegetation, establish required monitoring procedures, stage the work over time or require alteration of
the site design to ensure buffering.
(D) The adequacy, conditions and acceptability of any financial security shall be determined by the City
Council.
Ord. #79, adopted 03/09/2005
§ 157.17 MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION SITE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.
(A) Standards. No stormwater pollution prevention plan which fails to meet the standards contained in this
section shall be approved by the City Council or designated representative.
(B) Site dewatering. Water pumped from the site shall be treated by temporary sedimentation basins, grit
chambers, sand filters, upflow chambers, hydrocyclones, swirl concentrators or other appropriate
controls as appropriate. Water may not be discharged in a manner that causes erosion, scour, or flooding
of the site, receiving channels or a wetland.
(C) Construction site waste.
(1) Solid waste. Collected sediment, asphalt and concrete millings, floating debris, paper, plastic,
fabric, construction and demolition debris and other wastes must be disposed of properly and
must comply with MPCA disposal requirements.
(2) Hazardous materials. Oil, gasoline, paint and any hazardous substances must be properly stored,
including secondary containment, to prevent spill, leaks or other discharge. Restricted access to
storage areas must be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste
must be in compliance with MPCA regulations.
(3) Liquid waste. All other nonstormwater discharges (concrete truck washout, vehicle washing,
maintenance spills and the like) conducted during the construction activity shall not be
discharged to the municipal storm sewer, wetlands, natural drainageways or waters of the state.
(D) Tracking. Vehicle tracking of sediment onto paved surfaces must be removed by street sweeping
weekly or as required by the city to prevent discharge of sediment-laden water from entering the city
storm sewer system.
(E) Drain inlet protection. All storm drain inlets shall be protected during construction until final
establishment has been accomplished or until approval from the city.
407 |Page
(F) Site erosion control. The following criteria (F)(1) through (4) apply only to construction activities that
result in stormwater leaving the site.
(1) Channelized runoff from adjacent areas passing through the site shall be diverted around
disturbed areas, if practical. Otherwise, the channel shall be protected as described below.
Sheetflow runoff from adjacent areas greater than 10,000 square feet in area shall also be
diverted around disturbed areas, unless shown to have resulted runoff rates of less than 0.5
feet/second across the disturbed area for the 1-year storage. Diverted runoff shall be conveyed in
a manner that will not cause erosion, scour or flooding of the conveyance at receiving channels.
(2) All activities on the site shall be conducted in a logical sequence to minimize the area of bare soil
exposed at any one time.
(3) Runoff from the entire disturbed area on the site shall be controlled by meeting either divisions
(a) and (b) or (a) and (c).
(a) All exposed soil areas with a continuous positive slope within 200 lineal feet of a surface
water must have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover for the exposed soil
areas year-round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames:
Type of Slope Time
Steeper than 3:1 7 days
10:1 to 3:1 14 days
Flatter than 10:1 21 days
(b) For sites with more than ten acres disturbed at one time, or if a channel originates in the
disturbed area, one or more temporary or permanent sedimentation basins shall be
constructed. Each sedimentation basin shall have a surface area of at least one percent of
the area draining to the basin and at least three feet of depth and constructed in
accordance with accepted design specifications. Sediment shall be removed to maintain a
depth of three feet. The basin discharge rate shall also be sufficiently low as to not cause
erosion, scour or flooding along the discharge channel or the receiving water.
(c) For sites with less than ten acres disturbed at one time, silt fences or equivalent control
measures shall be placed along all side slopes and downslope sides of the site. If a
channel or area of concentrated runoff passes through the site, silt fences shall be placed
along the channel edges to reduce sediment reaching the channel. The use of silt fences
or equivalent control measures must include a maintenance and inspection schedule.
(4) Any soil or dirt storage piles containing more than ten cubic yards of material should not be
located with a downslide drainage length of less than 25 feet from the toe of the pile to a
roadway or drainage channel. If remaining for more than seven days, they shall be stabilized by
mulching vegetative cover, tarps or other means. Erosion from piles which will be in existence
for less than seven days shall be controlled by placing straw bales or silt fence barriers around
408 |Page
the pile. In-street utility repair or construction soil or dirt storage piles located closer than 25 feet
of a roadway or drainage channel must be covered with tarps or suitable alternative control; if
exposed for more than seven days, the storm drain inlets must be protected with an appropriate
filtering barrier.
(G) Inspection and maintenance. All stormwater management BMPs shall be inspected weekly or after
every 1/2-inch rain event by the applicant. If sediment has reached 1/3 the capacity of the sediment
control practice, appropriate maintenance or replacement of the BMP must be completed to ensure
maximum effectiveness.
Ord. #79, adopted 03/09/2005
§ 157.18 COMPLETION OF WORK.
Work will be considered complete when all exposed soil areas have undergone final stabilization, as
defined in § 155.06; is constructed to finish grade, and is in conformance with all permit conditions of approval
to the satisfaction of the city. The applicant or representative shall notify the city when the land-disturbing
operations are ready for final inspection. Final approval shall not be given until all work, including installation
of all drainage facilities and their protective devices, and all erosion control measures, have been completed and
final stabilization has occurred in accordance with this chapter.
Ord. #79, adopted 03/09/2005
§ 157.19 ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES.
(A) Right of entry. The applicant shall promptly allow the city and its authorized representatives, upon
presentation of credentials, to:
(1) Enter upon the permitted site for the purpose of obtaining information, examination of records,
conducting investigations, inspections or surveys;
(2) Bring any equipment upon the permitted site as is necessary to conduct the surveys and
investigations;
(3) Examine and copy any books, papers, records or memoranda pertaining to activities or records
required to be kept under the terms and conditions of this permitted site;
(4) Inspect the stormwater pollution control measures;
(5) Sample and monitor any items or activities pertaining to stormwater pollution control measures;
and
(6) Any temporary or permanent obstruction to the safe and easy access of an inspection shall be
promptly removed upon the inspectorÓs request. The cost of providing this access shall be borne
by the applicant.
409 |Page
(B) Warning letter. If, upon inspection by the city, the applicant fails to implement the erosion and sediment
control practices outlined in the approved stormwater pollution prevention plan, the city will notify the
applicant of noncompliance and a timeline for completion of any work to bring the site into compliance.
(C) Action against the financial security. If appropriate actions by the applicant have not been completed
within seven days after notification by the city, the city may act against the financial security if any of
the conditions listed below exist. The city shall use funds from this security to finance any corrective or
remedial work undertaken by the city or a contractor under contract to the city and to reimburse the city
for all direct cost incurred in the process of remedial work, including but not limited to staff time and
attorneyÓs fees:
(1) The applicant ceases land-disturbing activities and/or filling and abandons the work site prior to
completion of the city-approved grading plan;
(2) The applicant fails to conform to any city-approved grading plan and/or the stormwater pollution
control plan as approved by the city, or related supplementary instructions;
(3) The techniques utilized under the stormwater pollution control plan fail within one year of
installation;
(4) The applicant fails to reimburse the city for corrective action taken under § 155.16; or
(5) Emergency action under either part (D).
(D) Emergency action. If circumstances exist such that noncompliance with this chapter poses an immediate
danger to the public health, safety and welfare, as determined by the city, the city may take emergency
preventative action. The city shall also take every reasonable action possible to contact and direct the
applicant to take any necessary action. Any cost to the city may be recovered from the applicantÓs
financial security.
Penalty, see § 155.99
Ord. #79, adopted 03/09/2005
§ 157.99 PENALTY.
Any person, firm or corporation violating any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor
and a separate offense shall be deemed committed on each day during or on which a violation occurs or
continues.
Ord. #79, adopted 03/09/2005
410 |Page
157.01. Findings . It is hereby determined that:
(A) Land development projects and associated increases in impervious cover alter the
hydrologic response of local watersheds and increase stormwater runoff rates and
volumes, flooding, stream channel erosion, and sediment transport and deposition;
and,
(B) This stormwater runoff contributes to increased quantities of water-borne
pollutants; and,
(C) Stormwater runoff, soil erosion and non-point source pollution can be controlled and minimized
through the regulation of stormwater runoff from development sites. Therefore, the City establishes this set of
water quality and quantity policies applicable to all surface waters to provide reasonable guidance for the
regulation of stormwater runoff for the purpose of protecting local water resources from degradation. It is
determined that the regulation of stormwater runoff discharges from land development projects and other
construction activities in order to control and minimize increases in stormwater runoff rates and volumes, soil
erosion, stream channel erosion, and non-point source pollution associated with stormwater runoff is in the
public interest and will prevent threats to public health and safety.
157.02. Definitions
The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the
meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a
different meaning:
Bench is a relatively level step excavated into earth material on which fill is to be
placed.
Best Management Practices (BMP) are erosion control, sediment control and water quality management
practices that are most effective and practicable for means of controlling, preventing and reducing the
degradation of surface water as published by state or designated area-wide planning agencies.
Buffer means land that is used to protect adjacent lands and waters from\\development and more intensive land
uses. The land is kept in a natural state of trees, shrubs, and low ground cover and understory of plants and
functions to filter runoff, control sediment and nutrient movement, and protect fish and wildlife habitat. In areas
of agricultural use, the land may be used for less intensive agricultural purposes provided its function as a buffer
remains intact.
Channel means a natural or artificial watercourse with a definite bed and banks that conducts continuously or
periodically flowing water.
Common Plan of Development or Sale is a contiguous area where multiple separate and distinct land disturbing
activities may be taking place at different times, or on different schedules, but under one proposed plan. This
item is broadly defined to include design, permit application, advertisement or physical demarcation indicating
that land-disturbing activities may occur.
Detention facility is a temporary or permanent natural or man-made structure that provides for the temporary
storage of stormwater runoff.
Discharge is the release, conveyance, channeling, runoff or drainage of stormwater, including snowmelt, from a
construction or development site.
Filter strip is a vegetated section of land designed to treat runoff as overland sheet flow. It may be designed in
any natural vegetated form from a grassy meadow to a small forest. The dense vegetated cover facilitates
pollutant removal, reduces erosion and promotes infiltration.
Floodplain the channel or beds proper and the areas adjoining a wetland, lake or
411 |Page
watercourse that have been or hereafter may be covered by the regional flood.
High water level is the expected elevation the water in a stormwater pond will rise to a 100 year rain event as
calculated by the pond design.
Hydric soils are soils that are saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop
anaerobic conditions in the upper soil horizon.
Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) means a Natural Resource Conservation Service classification system in which
soils are categorized into four runoff potential groups. The groups range from A soils, with high permeability
and little runoff production, to D soils, which have low permeability rates and produce much more runoff.
Impaired Waters are water bodies that do not meet water quality standards and designated uses because of
pollutant(s), pollution, or unknown causes of impairment.
Impervious surface is a constructed hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil
and causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities and at an increased rate of flow than existed prior to
development. Examples include rooftops, sidewalks, patios, driveways, parking lots, storage areas, and
concrete, asphalt, or gravel roads. Class 5 gravel surfaces are considered to be impervious surfaces.
Land disturbance activity is any land change that may result in soil erosion from water or wind and the
movement of sediments into or upon waters or lands within this governmentÓs jurisdiction, including but not
limited to construction, clearing and grubbing, grading, excavating, transporting and filling of land. Within the
context of this ordinance, land disturbance activity does not mean:
(A)minor land disturbance activities including, but not limited to, underground utility repairs, home
gardens, home landscaping, minor repairs and maintenance work which do not disturb more than two thousand
(2,000) square feet of land or exceed one hundred (100) cubic yards of earthwork provided work does not
obstruct or modify a watercourse or storm sewer system and is not located in a floodplain;
(B)installation and maintenance of fences, signs, posts, poles, electric, telephone, cable television, utility
lines or individual service connections to these utilities; or
(C)general farming practices, or
(D)emergency work to protect life, limb, or property and emergency repairs, unless the land disturbing
activity would have otherwise required an approved erosion and sediment control plan, except for the
emergency. If such a plan would have been required, then the disturbed land area shall be shaped and stabilized
in accordance with the cityÓs requirements as soon as possible.
Native vegetation is the pre-settlement (already existing in Minnesota at the time of statehood in 1858) group of
plant species native to the local region, that were not introduced as a result of European settlement or
subsequent human introduction.
Normal water level refers to the permanent pool of water retained in a stormwater
pond. By design, this is the water level below the invert elevation of the pond outlet with a depth not to exceed
eight (8) feet.
Ordinary high water level "Ordinary high water level" means the boundary of water basins, watercourses,
public waters, and public waters wetlands, and:
(A)the ordinary high water level is an elevation delineating the highest water level that has been
maintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence upon the landscape, commonly the point where the
natural vegetation changes from predominantly aquatic to predominantly terrestrial;
(B)for watercourses, the ordinary high water level is the elevation of the top of the bank of the channel;
and
(C)for reservoirs and flowages, the ordinary high water level is the operating elevation of the normal
summer pool.
Outfall is the point of discharge to any watercourse from a public or private stormwater drainage system.
412 |Page
Permanent cover means Ðfinal stabilizationÑ. Examples include grass, gravel, asphalt and concrete. See also the
definition of Ðfinal stabilizationÑ.
Pretreatment means directing stormwater runoff through a BMP or series of BMPs for the purpose of removing
sediment and/or other pollutants prior to discharge into a receiving basin.
Project is a planned undertaking resulting in changes to the condition of a property.
Public Waters are waters of the state as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.005, Subdivision 15.
Retention facility is a temporary or permanent natural or manmade structure that provides for the storage of
storm water runoff by means of a permanent pool of water.
Runoff is rainfall, snowmelt, dewatering discharge, irrigation or any man-made sources of water flowing over
the ground surface.
Sediment is the product of an erosion process; solid material both mineral and organic, which is in suspension,
is being transported, or has been moved by water, wind, or ice and has come to rest on the earth's surface either
above or below water level.
Slope is the incline of a ground surface expressed as a ratio of horizontal distance to vertical distance.
Special Water means a s urface water or receiving water that is of a high quality or is deemed worthy to receive
extra protection.
Stormwater. Under Minnesota Rule 7077.0105, Subpart 41b), storm water, Ðmeans precipitation runoff,
stormwater runoff, snow melt runoff and any other surface runoff and drainageÑ. According to the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), under 40 CFR 122.26 \[b\]\[13\], ÐStormwater means storm water runoff, snow melt
runoff and surface and drainageÑ. Stormwater does not include construction site dewatering.
Storm sewer system, includes but is not limited to, the combination of roadway gutters, roadway section
ditches, culverts, storm sewer piping, overflow channels, infiltration trenches, detention and retention water
quality treatment basins and other methods or devices used for capturing, conveying, controlling and treating
stormwater and snow melt runoff.
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan is joint stormwater, erosion prevention and sediment control plan that is
a document containing the requirements of Section I. When implemented, the plan will define the methods to be
used to reduce soil erosion on a parcel of land and off-site non-point pollution. The plan involves both
temporary and permanent controls.
Stormwater pond (also referred to as wet sedimentation basin, wet retention basin, or simply wet pond) is a
man-made or modified natural basin constructed to capture and retain stormwater runoff for the purpose of
removing pollutants and mitigating downstream water quantity impacts.
Surface Waters means all streams, ponds, lakes, marshes, wetlands, reservoirs, springs, rivers, drainage
systems, waterways, watercourses, and irrigation systems, whether natural or artificial, public or private.
Vegetated (Grassy) swale is a vegetated earthen channel that conveys storm water while treating the stormwater
by biofiltration. Such swales aid in the removal of pollutants by both filtration and infiltration.
Waters of the State as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 115.01, Subdivision
22, the term, Ð . . . waters of the state means all streams, lakes, ponds, marshes, watercourses, waterways, wells,
springs, reservoirs, aquifers, irrigation systems, drainage systems and all other bodies or accumulations of
water, surface or underground, natural or artificial, public or private, which are contained within, flow through,
or border upon the state or any portion thereofÑ. Commentary: According to Minnesota Rules 7050.0130,
Subpart A, disposal systems or treatment works operated under either a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
(MPCA) permit or an agency certificate of compliance are not considered Ðwaters of the state.Ñ Under
Minnesota Rules 7050.0130, Subpart F, constructed wetlands designed for wastewater treatment are not
Ðwaters of the state.Ñ Also see the definition of ÐWetlandsÑ.
Watercourse is a ditch, stream, creek, or other defined channel intended for the conveyance of water, runoff,
groundwater discharge or similar hydraulic or hydrologic purpose.
413 |Page
Wetlands. "Wetlands" means lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water table is
usually at or near the surface or the land is covered by shallow water. For purposes of this definition, wetlands
must have the following three attributes:
(A)have a predominance of hydric soils;
(B)are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support
a prevalence of hydrophytic vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions; and
(C)under normal circumstances support a prevalence of such vegetation. (MN Statutes 103.G.005)
157.02. Purpose
The City has a strong interest in protecting and managing its valuable water and natural
resources, recognizing the relationships between resource protection, land use management, development,
redevelopment and fiscal responsibility. Federal and State regulations have placed restrictions and requirements
on the management and discharge of stormwater with which the City must comply. The CityÓs Local Surface
Water Management Plan (LSWMP) established goals and policies to meet those regulations. The City provides
requirements for stormwater management on development and redevelopment projects to ensure the CityÓs
goals and policies are met and that there is compliance with federal, state, and local rulesThe City recognizes
in its Surface Water Management Plan that Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD has primary responsibility
for stormwater management permits within the City, and staff is authorized to defer to RCWD in permit review
and enforcement.
157.02-157.03 Reserved
157.04 Stormwater Management Plan
(A)General Criteria. A stormwater management plan shall be required of all new development,
redevelopment and land disturbance projects greater than one (1) acre in parcel size or part of a greater plan of
development. This plan shall be designed to reduce and/or minimize the impervious area of the site, control the
peak flow rate, and minimize the volume of stormwater runoff from the same as required in the LSWMP and
this Code. Plans must be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the start of construction. Each
project will construct, implement and maintain all best management practices (BMP) that are deemed necessary
to achieve the goals of this Chapter, including post-construction stormwater management BMPs. Prior to the
start of construction, all projects shall be in possession of any and all permits required for the project including,
but not limited to:
1.Rice Creek Watershed District,
2.City of Centerville,
3.U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
4.National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), and
5.Wetland restoration or mitigation plan approval.
Projects smaller than one (1) acre in size are encouraged to implement BMPs that will
promote infiltration and contribute to improved water quality. The City reserves the right to require erosion
prevention measures to land-disturbing activities of less than one acre, when in the judgment of the CityÓs
Public Works Director, the land disturbing activities are likely to result in discharge of sediment or other
pollution into the CityÓs stormwater system, or into Waters of the State.
157.05. Design Standards.
Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) shall be followed to achieve the best stormwater management. The
BMPs used should seek to mimic the natural hydrology, utilize pervious areas for stormwater treatment and to
414 |Page
infiltrate stormwater runoff from driveways, sidewalks, rooftops, parking lots, and landscaped areas to the
maximum extent practical to provide treatment for both water quality and quantity. The Minnesota Stormwater
Manual (MN Pollution Control Agency), the Minnesota Urban Small Sites BMP Manual (Metropolitan
Council), Local Road Research Board BMP Maintenance Guide, and Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas
(MPCA) are resources that provide guidance in achieving these goals.
(A)Implementation. Low Impact Development, Better Site Design, or Green Infrastructure design
techniques are the preferred methods of achieving stormwater management. Mimicking the natural topography
and land cover as they exist in the pre-developed condition to meet the standards and requirements of the City
and other regulatory agencies shall be the first consideration.
(B)Recommended Practices. Practices and methods used to achieve the intent of the above paragraph
shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
(1)rain gardens
(2)green roofs
(3)bio-retention practices
(4)pervious pavements or pavers
(5)plots of native vegetation and/or buffers in place of sod
(6)reforestation and revegetation
(7)trees and tree box filters
(8)reduction of impervious area
(9)rain water harvesting
(C)Other Practices. Other traditional stormwater BMPs may be approved on a site
by site basis to achieve the goals of water quality and quantity, and rate control. These practices shall conform
to the standards outlined in the resources referenced above.
(D)All stormwater runoff shall be pre-treated prior to discharge to any surface water.
(E)Maintenance Plan. A plan shall be established to maintain all temporary and permanent BMPs in a
working and efficient condition. This may include removal of invasive species, sediment, debris, or any other
foreign or obstructive object or condition that prevents the BMPs from performing as designed.
(F)Exemption. The mill and overlay or rehabilitation of a public roadway that does not create additional
impervious surfaces; and sidewalk or trail projects are exempt from these stormwater requirements. These
projects may be subject to other regulations.
157.06. Drainage.
Site alteration, grading, placement and installation of BMPs and other related activities shall be implemented in
such a way that drainage from the site shall not exceed the pre-developed rates and will not adversely affect
neighboring properties.
157.08. Calculations.
Hydrologic and hydraulic design calculations must be submitted for the pre-development and post-development
conditions for the 2, 10, and 100 year events as well as the 10 day snow melt event. Such calculations shall
include: (i) description of the design storm frequency, intensity and duration, (ii) time of concentration, (iii) Soil
Curve Numbers or runoff coefficients, (iv) peak runoff rates and total runoff volumes for each watershed area,
(v)infiltration rates, where applicable, (vi) culvert capacities, (vii) flow velocities, (viii) data on the increase in
rate and volume of runoff for the design storms used, and (ix) documentation of sources for all computation
methods and field test results.
157.07. Volume Control and Pollutant Management
415 |Page
Stormwater volume management practices shall be the equivalent of infiltrating or retaining the first one and
one-tenth (1.1) inches of precipitation over the impervious surface of the site. These practices should seek to
utilize pervious areas for stormwater treatment and to infiltrate stormwater runoff from driveways, sidewalks,
rooftops, parking lots and landscaped areas to the maximum extent practical to provide treatment for both water
quantity and quality.
A)New Development projects shall achieve no net increase from pre-project conditions (on an annual
average basis) of stormwater discharge volume; discharges of total suspended solids (TSS); and
discharge of total phosphorus (TP).
B)Redevelopment projects shall achieve a net reduction from pre-project conditions (on an annual average
basis) of stormwater discharge volume; discharges of total suspended solids (TSS); and discharge of
total phosphorus (TP).
The requirements of this section may be altered and alternative treatment BMPs approved under the following
limitations:
1)Infiltration techniques shall be prohibited when the infiltration structural BMP will receive discharges
from or be constructed in areas:
(a)where industrial facilities are not authorized to infiltrate industrial stormwater under an
NPDES/SDS Permit,
(b)where vehicle fueling and maintenance occur
(c)with less than 3 feet of separation from the bottom of the infiltration system to the elevation
of the seasonally saturated soils or top of bedrock
(d)where high levels of contaminants in soil or groundwater will be mobilized by the infiltration
of stormwater.
2)Infiltration techniques will be restricted when the infiltration device will be constructed in areas:
(a)with predominately Hydrologic Soil Group D soils
(b)within 1,000 feet up-gradient or 100 feet down-gradient of active karst features
(c)within a Drinking Water Source Management Area (DWSMA) as defined in the cities
Wellhead Protection Plan
(d)where soil infiltration rates are more than 8.3 inches per hour
C)If volume and pollutant management controls cannot be constructed on-site, off-site locations where the
controls can be met must be identified. Guidance for best management practices and standards for these
mitigation processes should follow the Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) Design Sequence
Flowchart for flexible treatment options contained in the MN Stormwater Manual.
157.08. Impaired Waters and Total Maximum Daily Loads.
If a site drains to a surface water that has been listed as impaired pursuant to section 303(d) of the federal Clean
Water Act more stringent water quality measures will be required. If a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) has
been written for the impaired water then all best management practices deemed necessary to comply with the
requirements of the TMDL must be implemented.
416 |Page
157.09. Industrial Sites.
Certain industrial sites are required to prepare and implement a stormwater pollution prevention plan, and shall
file a notice of intent (NOI) under the provisions of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) general permit. The stormwater pollution prevention plan requirement applies to both existing and
new industrial sites.
157.10. Wetlands.
Runoff shall not be routed directly to wetlands without first passing through an appropriate settling or approved
pre-treatment basin. Said basins must meet engineering standards for volume and flow directed to the basin.
(A) A protective buffer strip of natural vegetation at least 15 feet (25 feet is preferred)
in width shall surround all wetlands.
(B) Wetlands must not be drained, filled, or altered, wholly or partially, unless in
compliance with and permitted under the most current rules adopted by the
Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources in the Wetland Conservation Act
(WCA). Wetland replacement must be guided by the following principles in
descending order:
(1) Avoidance
(2) Minimization
(3) Mitigation
(C) Permits to work in wetlands must be obtained from the local water management
organizations, acting as local governmental units (LGU), with respective jurisdiction within the City to
administer the WCA.
(D) Permanent boundary markers, in the form of signage approved by the City, should be installed prior to
final approval of the required clearing and grading plan.
157.11. Maintenance of Stormwater BMPÓs.
(A) The design and planning of all stormwater management facilities shall include detailed maintenance
and repair procedures to ensure their continued function. These plans will identify the parts or components of a
stormwater management facility that need to be maintained and the equipment and skills or training necessary.
Provisions for the periodic review and evaluation of the effectiveness of the maintenance program and the need
for revisions or additional maintenance procedures shall be included in the plan.
(B) All private stormwater BMPs shall be maintained by the owner(s) such that the BMP performs the
intended treatment function. Public stormwater BMPs shall be the responsibility of the City in that the City will
ensure that the capacity of retention/detention ponds is adequate and will repair or replace storm sewer system
components as needed.
(C) The applicant must ensure access to all stormwater treatment practices at the site for the purpose of
inspection and repair by securing all the maintenance easements needed on a permanent basis. These easements
will be recorded with the plan and will remain in effect even with transfer of title to the property.
(D) The applicant must execute an easement and an inspection and maintenance agreement binding on all
subsequent owners of land served by any on-site stormwater management measure in accordance with the
specifications of this ordinance.
157.12-157.14 Reserved
157.15. Alterations to and Use of Public and Private Stormwater Ponds.
417 |Page
(A)No alterations to shorelines or vegetation around stormwater ponds shall be allowed unless authorized
by the City.
(B)Fountains or other circulating devices will not be allowed in stormwater ponds unless authorized by
the City.
(C)Chemical treatment of stormwater ponds will not be allowed unless authorized by the City.
(D)Structures will not be allowed within the stormwater pond or protective buffer zone. These will
include but not be limited to retaining walls, docks, piers, diving platforms, etc.
(E)Recreational activities, including but not limited to boating, swimming, fishing and
skating are prohibited on stormwater ponds located on city owned property. These activities are discouraged on
all other ponds.
(F)Dumping of yard waste materials in, on or around any stormwater pond is prohibited.
(G)Cattails growing in and around stormwater ponds may be cut with the permission and direction of the
City.
157.16. Appropriations from stormwater ponds
Appropriation of water from stormwater ponds for the purpose of private irrigation may be allowed based upon
criteria established by the City. City approval must be granted before use begins.
157.17- Reserved
157.18. Rain Gardens. Rain Gardens in Road Right of Way
(A)Rain gardens proposed for construction in the right of way must have plans approved by the City
Public Works Department. These plans will include illustration of area draining to the rain garden; design
details to prove proper sizing/capacity to handle the area of drainage; illustrate property boundaries, location of
street features, driveway, house and other structures in relation to the rain garden; and include proof of
infiltration potential and ability to drawdown
within a 48 hour period.
(B)Rain gardens capturing street runoff would require a curb cut to direct flow into the rain garden. Curb
cuts for rain gardens approved in the right of way will be constructed and paid for by the City. All other
construction and maintenance associated with the rain garden is the sole responsibility of the homeowner except
where constructed as a required BMP for a street reconstruction, in which case the construction costs may be
paid for by the City.
(C)City staff or designee has right of entry to all rain gardens in the right of way to
ensure proper function of the feature.
(D)Rain gardens in the right of way will be mapped as part of the City stormwater management system.
These features will be counted toward meeting compliance of the CityÓs MS4 permit with the State of
Minnesota or other regulatory requirements imposed on the City through state, federal or other government
agencies.
(E)The City shall have no liability for a privately constructed rain garden or its associated features.
157.19-157.49 Reserved
Note: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (See Chapter 51)
418 |Page
TableofContents
StatutoryauthorizationandƦǒƩƦƚƭĻͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶ1
5ĻŅźƓźƷźƚƓƭͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶ͵1
GeneralStormwaterPermitsandwĻƨǒźƩĻƒĻƓƷƭͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶ͵6
WhenaNDPESPermitisrequiredandproofofĭƚǝĻƩğŭĻͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶ6
ConstructionSiteStormwaterRunoff/ƚƓƷƩƚƌͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶ6
BestManagementPractice(BMP)wĻƨǒźƩĻƒĻƓƷƭͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶ͵А
ErosionPreventiontƩğĭƷźĭĻƭͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶА
SedimentControltƩğĭƷźĭĻƭͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶ͵͵8
DewateringandBasin5ƩğźƓźƓŭͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶЊЉ
InspectionandağźƓƷĻƓğƓĭĻͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶ͵ЊЊ
PollutionPreventionaĻğƭǒƩĻƭͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶЊЌ
Termination/ƚƓķźƷźƚƓƭͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶ͵ЊЍ
DesignCriteriaforTemporarySediment.ğƭźƓͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶ͵ЊЍ
PostConstructionStormwaterManagement{ǤƭƷĻƒͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶ͵15
LongTermağźƓƷĻƓğƓĭĻͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶ͵͵ЊБ
PermanentStormwaterManagementSystemDesign/ƩźƷĻƩźğͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶ͵18
Rightof9ƓƷƩǤͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶ͵ЋЋ
źƚƌğƷźƚƓƭΉƦĻƓğƌƷǤΉĻƓŅƚƩĭĻƒĻƓƷͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶͶ͵ЋЌ
iii
StatutoryAuthorizationandPurpose
StatutoryAuthorization
Statutoryauthority.Minn.Stat.ch.(citationtoeithercountyenablingstat.394ormunicipal
enablingstat.462and467)authorizes theCityofCenterville toadoptlanduseregulations.
Mostrestrictivelawapplies.Intheeventofanyconflictbetweenprovisionsofthischapterorother
regulationsadoptedby theCityofCenterville,theStateofMinnesota,orFederalauthorities,
watersheddistrictorwatershedmanagementorganization,themorerestrictivestandardshall
prevail.
Purpose/Scope/Applicability
Purpose.Thepurposeofthischapterisestablishedtopromote,preserveandenhancenatural
resourcesandhumanhealthandsafetywithin theCityofCenterville byprotectingthemfromthe
adverseimpactsofuncontrolledstormwaterrunoffduringandafterconstructionprojects.
Scope.Thischaptersetsrequirementsforstormwaterconveyancesystemsandmanagement
practiceswithin theCityofCenterville.Thischapteralsoregulateslanddisturbingor
developmentactivitiesthatwouldhaveanegativeandpotentiallyirreversibleimpacton
waterquality.
Applicability.Therequirementsofthischapterapplytoallconstructionactivityasdefinedbelow.
Definitions
ͻ!ĭƷźǝĻƉğƩƭƷͼ meansaterrainhavingdistinctivelandformsandhydrologycreatedprimarilyfrom
thedissolutionofsolublerockswithin50feetofthelandsurface.
ͻ.ĻƭƷManagementPracticesΛ.atƭΜͼ meansthemosteffectiveandpracticablemeansoferosion
preventionandsedimentcontrol,andwaterqualitymanagementpracticesthatarethemost
effectiveandpracticablemeansoftocontrol,prevent,andminimizedegradationofsurfacewater,
includingavoidanceofimpacts,constructionphasing,minimizingthelengthoftimesoilareasare
exposed,prohibitions,pollutionpreventionthroughgoodhousekeeping,andothermanagement
practicespublishedbystateordesignatedareawideplanningagencies.
"CommonPlanofDevelopmentorSale"meansoneproposedplanforacontiguousareawhere
multipleseparateanddistinctlanddisturbingactivitiesmaybetakingplaceatdifferenttimes,on
differentschedules,butunderoneproposedplan.Oneplanisbroadlydefinedtoincludedesign,
permitapplication,advertisementorphysicaldemarcationindicatingthatlanddisturbingactivities
mayoccur.
"ConstructionActivity"meansactivitiesincludingclearing,grading,andexcavating,thatresultin
landdisturbanceofequaltoorgreaterthanoneacre,includingthedisturbanceoflessthanone
acreoftotallandareathatispartofalargercommonplanofdevelopmentorsaleifthelarger
commonplanwillultimatelydisturbequaltoorgreaterthanoneacre.Thisincludesadisturbanceto
thelandthatresultsinachangeinthetopography,existingsoilcover,bothvegetativeand
nonvegetative,ortheexistingsoiltopographythatmayresultinacceleratedstormwaterrunoffthat
mayleadtosoilerosionandmovementofsediment.Constructionactivitydoesnotincludea
disturbancetothelandoflessthanfiveacresforthepurposeofroutinemaintenanceperformedto
maintaintheoriginallineandgrade,hydrauliccapacity,andoriginalpurposeofthefacility.Routine
maintenancedoesnotincludeactivitiessuchasrepairs,replacementandothertypesofnonroutine
maintenance.Pavementrehabilitationthatdoesnotdisturbtheunderlyingsoils(e.g.,milland
overlayprojects)isnotconstructionactivity.
Page 1 of 23
"Dewatering"meanstheremovalofsurfaceorgroundwatertodryand/orsolidifyaconstruction
sitetoenableconstructionactivity.DewateringmayrequireaMinnesotaDepartmentofNatural
Resources(DNR)waterappropriationpermitand,ifdewateringwateriscontaminated,dischargeof
suchwatermayrequireanindividualMPCANPDES/SDSpermit.
ͻ5bw
Catchment!ƩĻğͼ meanstheHydrologicUnit08areasdelineatedanddigitizedbythe
MinnesotaDNR.ThecatchmentareasareavailablefordownloadattheMinnesotaDNRGeospatial
Commonswebsite.DNRcatchmentareasmaybelocallycorrected,inwhichcasethelocal
correctionsmaybeused.
"EnergyDissipation"meansmethodsemployedatpipeoutletstopreventerosioncausedbythe
rapiddischargeofwaterscouringsoils.
"ErosionPrevention"meansmeasuresemployedtopreventerosionsuchassoilstabilization
practices,permanentcoverorconstructionphasing.
"Fullyreconstructed"meansareaswhereimpervioussurfaceshavebeenremoveddownto
theunderlyingsoils.Activitiessuchasstructurerenovation,millandoverlayprojects,and
otherpavementrehabilitationprojectsthatdonotexposetheunderlyingsoilsbeneaththe
structure,pavement,oractivityarenotconsideredfullyreconstructed.Maintenance
activitiessuchascatchbasinrepair/replacement,utilityrepair/replacement,pipe
repair/replacement,lighting,andpedestrianrampimprovementsarenotconsideredfully
reconstructed.
ͻDĻƓĻƩğƌƦĻƩƒźƷͼ meansapermitissuedunderMinn.R.7001.0210toacategoryof
owners/operatorswhoseoperations,emissions,activities,discharges,orfacilitiesarethe
sameorsubstantiallysimilar.
"Groundwater"meansthewatercontainedbelowthesurfaceoftheearthinthesaturated
zoneincluding,withoutlimitation,allwaterswhetherunderconfined,unconfined,or
perchedconditions,innearsurfaceunconsolidatedsedimentorregolith,orinrock
formationsdeeperunderground.
"Infeasible"meansnottechnologicallypossibleornoteconomicallypracticableand
achievableinlightofthebestindustrypractices.
"Initiatedimmediately"meanstakinganactiontocommencesoilstabilizationassoonas
practicable,butnolaterthantheendoftheworkday,followingthedaywhentheland
disturbingactivitiestemporarilyorpermanentlyceased.Ifconstructionworkonthesitewill
beceasefor14ormoreadditionalcalendardays,orseven(7)calendardaysonaproject
thatiswithinonemile(aerialradiusmeasurement)of,andflowsto,oneormoreofthe
following:ͻźƒƦğźƩĻķǞğƷĻƩƭͼͲͻƚƷŷĻƩspecialǞğƷĻƩƭͼͲͻƦƩƚŷźĬźƷĻķǞğƷĻƩƭͼͲand/or
ͻƩĻƭƷƩźĭƷĻķǞğƷĻƩƭͼasdefined),stabilizationcanbeimmediatelyinitiatedby:
a) Preppingthesoilforvegetativeornonvegetativestabilization;or
b) Applyingmulchorothernonvegetativeproducttotheexposedsoilarea;or
c) Seedingorplantingtheexposedarea;or
d) Startinganyoftheactivitiesinaconaportionoftheareatobestabilized,butnotonthe
entirearea;or
e) Finalizingarrangementstohavestabilizationproductfullyinstalledincompliancewiththe
applicabledeadlineforcompletingstabilization.
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 2 of 23
ͻLƒƦğźƩĻķğƷĻƩƭͼ meansawaterwithanUSEPAapprovedTMDLforanyoftheimpairmentslisted
inthisitem,andwatersidentifiedasimpairedundersection303(d)ofthefederalCleanWaterAct
forphosphorus(nutrienteutrophicationbiologicalindicators),turbidity,TSS,dissolvedoxygenor
aquaticbiota(fishbioassessment,aquaticplant
bioassessmentandaquaticmacroinvertebrate
bioassessment).
"ImperviousSurface"meansaconstructedhardsurfacethateitherpreventsorretardstheentryof
waterintothesoilandcauseswatertorunoffthesurfaceingreaterquantitiesandatanincreased
rateofflowthanpriortodevelopment.Examplesincluderooftops,driveways,parkinglots,and
concrete,asphalt,orgravelroads.Bridgesoversurfacewatersareconsideredimpervioussurfaces.
Recreationaltrailsthataredistinctlysetapartfromaroadway(i.e.notparallel)andintendedfornon
motorizedrecreationaluses,arenotconsideredimpervioussurfaces.Sidewalksthatareparalleltoa
roadway(orgenerallyfollowingalongsidearoadway)muststillbeincludedasimpervioussurfaces.
ͻ\[źƓĻğƩƦƩƚƆĻĭƷͼ meansconstructionofneworfullyreconstructedroads,trails,sidewalks,orrail
linesthatarenotpartofacommonplanofdevelopmentorsale.Forexample,roadsbeing
constructedconcurrentlywithanewresidentialdevelopmentarenotconsideredlinearprojects
becausetheyarepartofacommonplanofdevelopmentorsale.
ͻaǒƓźĭźƦğƌseparatestormsewerƭǤƭƷĻƒͼorͻa{Ѝͼ meansaconveyanceorsystemofconveyances
includingroadswithdrainagesystems,municipalstreets,catchbasins,curbs,gutters,ditches,
manmadechannels,orstormdrains:
a) Ownedoroperatedbyastate,city,town,county,district,association,orotherpublicbody,
createdbyorpursuanttostatelaw,havingjurisdictionoverdisposalofsewage,industrial
wastes,stormwater,orotherwastes,includingspecialdistrictsunderstatelawsuchasa
sewerdistrict,floodcontroldistrict,ordrainagedistrictorsimilarentity,oranIndiantribe
oranauthorizedIndiantribeorganization,oradesignatedandapprovedmanagement
Agencyundersection208ofthefederalCleanWaterAct,UnitedStatesCode,title33,
section1288,thatdischargesintowatersofthestate;
b)Designedorusedforcollectingorconveyingstormwater;
c) Thatisnotacombinedsewer;and
d) Thatisnotpartofapubliclyownedtreatmentworksasdefinedin40CFR122.2.
Municipalseparatestormsewersystemsdonotincludeseparatestormsewersinverydiscrete
areas,suchasindividualbuildings.
"NationalPollutantDischargeEliminationSystem(NPDES)"meanstheprogramforissuing,
modifying,revoking,reissuing,terminating,monitoring,andenforcingpermitsundertheClean
WaterAct,asamended(33U.S.C.1251etseq.Section1342and40CFRparts122,123,124and
450).
"NaturalBuffer"meansanareaofundisturbedcoversurroundingsurfacewaterswithinwhich
constructionactivitiesarerestricted.Naturalbufferincludesthevegetation,exposedrock,orbarren
groundthatexistspriortocommencementofearthdisturbingactivities.
"NormalWettedPerimeter"meanstheareaofaconveyance,suchasaditchorchannel,thatisin
contactwithwaterduringfloweventsthatareexpectedtooccurfromatwoyear,24hourstorm
event.
ͻhƷŷĻƩSpecialğƷĻƩƭͼ meansTroutLakesidentifiedinMinn.R.6264.0050,subp.2.andTrout
StreamslistedinMinn.R.6264.0050,subp.4.
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 3 of 23
ͻApplicantͼ meansthepersons,firm,governmentalagency,orotherentityontheapplication
submittedandareresponsibleforcompliancewiththetermsandconditionsofthisordinance.
"PermanentCover"meanssurfacetypesthatwillpreventsoilfailureundererosiveconditions.
Examplesinclude:gravel,concrete,perennialcover,orotherlandscapedmaterial
thatwill
permanentlyarrestsoilerosion.Permanentcoverconsistsofauniformperennialvegetativecover
(i.e.,evenlydistributed,withoutlargerbareareas)withadensityof70percentofthevegetative
covernativetolocalundisturbedareasonallareasnotcoveredbypermanentstructures,or
equivalentpermanentstabilizationmeasures.PermanentcoverdoesnotincludetemporaryBMPs
suchaswoodfiberblanket,mulch,androllederosioncontrolproducts.
"Project(s)"meansallconstructionactivityplannedand/orconductedunderthisordinance.The
projectoccursonthesiteorsitesasdescribedinthesiteplan.
"PublicWaters"meansallwaterbasinsandwatercoursesdescribedinMinn.Stat.Sect.103G.005
subp.15.
ͻtƩƚŷźĬźƷĻķğƷĻƩƭͼ meansBoundaryWatersCanoeAreaWilderness;VoyageursNationalPark;
KettleRiverfromthesiteoftheformerdamatSandstonetoitsconfluencewiththeSaintCroix
River;RumRiverfromOgechieLakespillwaytothenorthernmostconfluencewithLakeOnamia;
LakeSuperiorNorthoflatitude47degrees,57minutes,13seconds;LakeSuperiorEastofHatPoint;
LakeSuperiorSouthoftheMinnesotaOntarioboundary;LakeSuperiorWestoftheMinnesota
Michiganboundary;BootLake,AnokaCounty;KettleRiverinsections15,22,23,T41N,R20,Pine
County;PenningtonBog,BeltramiCounty;PurvisLakeOberFoundation,SaintLouisCounty;waters
withinthebordersofItascaWildernessSanctuary,ClearwaterCounty;IronSpringsBog,Clearwater
County;WolsfeldWoods,HennepinCounty;GreenWaterLake,BeckerCounty;BlackdogPreserve,
DakotaCounty;PrairieBushClover,JacksonCounty;BlackLakeBog,PineCounty;PembinaTrail
Preserve,PolkCounty;andFallsCreek,WashingtonCounty.
ͻwĻƭƷƩźĭƷĻķğƷĻƩƭͼ meansLakeSuperior,exceptthoseportionsidentifiedasprohibitedspecial
watersinSection7.2.1.above;theMississippiRiverinthoseportionsfromLakeItascatothe
southerlyboundaryofMorrisonCountythatareincludedintheMississippiHeadwatersBoard
comprehensiveplandatedFebruary12,1981;SaintCroixRiver,entirelength;CannonRiverfrom
northerncitylimitsofFaribaulttoitsconfluencewiththeMississippiRiver;NorthForkoftheCrow
RiverfromLakeKoronisoutlettotheMeekerWrightcountyline;KettleRiverfromnorthPine
CountylinetothesiteoftheformerdamatSandstone;MinnesotaRiverfromLacqueParledamto
RedwoodCountyStateAidHighway11;MississippiRiverfromCountyStateAidHighway7bridgein
SaintCloudtonorthwesterncitylimitsofAnoka;RumRiverfromStateHighway27bridgeinOnamia
toMadisonandRicestreetsinAnoka;theLakeTroutLakesidentifiedinMinn.R.7050.0335
includingthoseinsidetheboundariesoftheBoundaryWatersCanoeAreaWildernessand
VoyageursNationalPark;andCalcareousFenslistedinMinn.R7050.0335,subp.1.
"SedimentControl"meansmethodsemployedtopreventsuspendedsedimentinstormwaterfrom
leavingthesite(e.g.siltfences,compostlogsandstormdraininletprotection).
"Stabilize","Stabilized","Stabilization"meanstheexposedgroundsurfacehasbeencoveredby
appropriatematerialssuchasmulch,stakedsod,riprap,erosioncontrolblanket,matsorother
materialthatpreventserosionfromoccurring.Grassseeding,agriculturalcropseedingorother
seedingaloneisnotstabilization.Mulchmaterialsmustachieveapproximately90percentground
coverage(typically2ton/acre).
"Stormwater"meansprecipitationrunoff,stormwaterrunoff,snowmeltrunoff,andanyother
surfacerunoffanddrainage.
ͻ{ƷƩǒĭƷǒƩğƌStormwater.atͼ meansastationaryandpermanentBMPthatisdesigned,
constructed,andoperatedtopreventorreducethedischargeofpollutantsinstormwater.
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 4 of 23
"SurfaceWaterorWaters"meansallstreams,lakes,ponds,marshes,wetlands,reservoirs,springs,
rivers,drainagesystems,waterways,watercourses,andirrigationsystemswhethernaturalor
artificial,publicorprivate,exceptthatsurfacewatersdonotincludestormwatertreatmentsystems.
"Wetlands"(asdefinedinMinn.R.7050.0186,subp.1a.B.)meansthoseareasthat
areinundatedor
saturatedbysurfacewaterorgroundwateratafrequencyanddurationsufficienttosupport,and
undernormalcircumstancesdosupport,aprevalenceofvegetationtypicallyadaptedforlifein
saturatedsoilconditions.Wetlandsgenerallyincludeswamps,marshes,bogs,andsimilarareas.
Constructedwetlandsdesignedforwastewatertreatmentarenotwatersofthestate.Wetlands
musthavethefollowingattributes:
a) Apredominanceofhydricsoils;and
b) Inundatedorsaturatedbysurfacewaterorgroundwateratafrequencyandduration
sufficienttosupportaprevalenceofhydrophyticvegetationtypicallyadaptedforlifeina
saturatedsoilcondition;and
c) Undernormalcircumstancessupportaprevalenceofsuchvegetation.
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 5 of 23
1. WhenaNationalPollutantDischargeEliminationsSystem/StateDisposal
System(NPDES/SDS)Permitisrequiredandproofofcoverage
a. Mustobtainastatepermit.The applicant ofconstructionactivitymustapplyfor
coverageundertheMinnesotaPollutionControl!ŭĻƓĭǤƭΛat/!ƭΜConstruction
StormwaterPermit(PermitNo:MNR100001).A CityofCentervillepermit willnotbe
issueduntilcoverageundertheat/!ƭConstructionStormwaterPermithasbeen
obtainedbytheapplicant.
b.Otherrequiredpermits.Forcertainconstructionactivity,variousotherpermitsmay
alsoberequired.The applicant ofconstructionactivityisresponsibleforobtainingany
otherrequiredpermitsfrom theCityofCenterville andotherState,Federal,orlocal
governmentalagencieshavinganyauthorityovertheworktobeperformed.Typically,such
agenciesmayinclude,butarenotlimitedto,theU.S.ArmyCorpsofEngineers,the
MinnesotaPollutionControlAgency,theMinnesotaDepartmentofNaturalResources,the
MinnesotaDepartmentofTransportation,andtheStateHistoricalPreservationOffice.
Note:Items1.a.andb.arediscretionaryandnotrequiredtomeettheMS4permitanditisuptothe
MS4iftheywouldliketoincludethemintheirordinance.
2. ConstructionSiteStormwaterRunoffControl
a. SitePlanReview ΝLƷĻƒЊВ͵ЎΞ
i. The applicant ofconstructionactivityshallsubmitacopyofthesiteplanaspartofthe
application forreviewandconfirmationthatordinancerequirementshavebeenmet.
ii. Ifthe application isdenied,andthe applicant wouldliketoproceedwiththeproject,
the applicant mustrevisethe application,includingthesiteplan,andresubmit.
iii. Oncea permit hasbeenissued/approved,thesiteplanbecomesanenforceable
document,andthe applicant mustcomplywithallrequirementsidentifiedinthesite
plan.The applicant isalsoresponsibleforkeepingthestormwaterrunoffcontrol
requirementsidentifiedinthesiteplanuptodate.
b. SitePlanRequirements ΝLƷĻƒЊВ͵ЎğƓķЊВ͵ЊЌΞ
i. Thesiteplanmustincludethefollowingprojectinformation.
1) Projectname
2) Locationoftheproject
3) Totalacreagetobedisturbed
4) Namesofthe applicant responsiblefortheproposedconstructionactivity
5) \[TheMS4mayinsertanyadditionalinformationthattheywouldrequireaspartof
theirapplication,i.e.checklists\]
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 6 of 23
ii. Thesiteplanmustincludethelocation,type,andnarrativeofthefollowingbest
managementpractices(BMPs)consistentwithstandardsidentifiedinPart2.c.(Best
ManagementPractices(BMPs)Requirements)
1) Downgradientsedimentcontrols;
2) Soilstabilization(temporaryandpermanent);
3) Vehicletracking;
4) Inspectionandmaintenanceschedules;and
5) OtherBMPsasapplicable:
a) Areasthatarenottobedisturbed;
b) PhasingandstabilizationBMPsforsteepslopes;
c) Temporaryorpermanentditchesorswalesbeingusedas
sedimentcontainmentsystems;
d)Pipeoutletenergydissipation
e) BufferZonesincludingbutnotlimitedto:
i. Aminimumofa50footnaturalbuffer;
ii. Aminimumofa100footbufferzonefromͻƚƷŷĻƩspecialǞğƷĻƩƭͼͲ
ͻƦƩƚŷźĬźƷĻķǞğƷĻƩƭͼͲandͻƩĻƭƷƩźĭƷĻķǞğƷĻƩƭͼasdefined;
f) InletprotectionBMPs;
g) StockpileBMPs;
h) Dewateringandbasindraining;
i) TemporarySedimentationBasinsconsistentwithstandardsidentifiedinPart
2.d.(DesignCriteriaforTemporarySedimentBasins)
j) PollutionPreventionManagementBMPs
k) PermanentStormwaterManagementBMPs
c. BestManagementPractices(BMPs)Requirements ΝLƷĻƒЊВ͵ЌğƓķЊВ͵ЎΞ
i. ErosionPreventionPractices
1) Allareasnottobedisturbedmustbedelineatedbeforeworkbegins;
2) Allsteepslopesmustbeidentifiedinthesiteplananddisturbanceofthosesteep
slopesshouldbeminimized.Ifsteepslopesmustbedisturbed,techniquessuchas
phasingandstabilizationpracticesdesignedforsteepslopes(e.g.,slopedraining
andterracing)mustbeimplemented;
3) Allexposedsoilareas,includingstockpilesmustbestabilized;
a) Stabilizationmustbeinitiatedimmediatelytolimitsoilerosionwhen
constructionactivityhaspermanentlyortemporarilyceasedonanyportionof
thesiteandwillnotresumeforaperiodexceeding14calendardays(orseven
(7)calendardaysonaprojectthatiswithinonemile(aerialradius
measurement)of,andflowsto,oneormoreofthefollowing:ͻźƒƦğźƩĻķ
ǞğƷĻƩƭͼͲͻƚƷŷĻƩspecialǞğƷĻƩƭͼͲͻƦƩƚŷźĬźƷĻķǞğƷĻƩƭͼͲand/orͻƩĻƭƷƩźĭƷĻķǞğƷĻƩƭͼ
asdefined);
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 7 of 23
b) Stabilizationmustbecompletednolaterthan14calendardaysafterthe
constructionactivityhasceased(orseven(7)calendardaysonaprojectthatis
withinonemile(aerialradiusmeasurement)of,andflowsto,oneormoreof
thefollowing:ͻźƒƦğźƩĻķǞğƷĻƩƭͼͲͻƚƷŷĻƩspecialǞğƷĻƩƭͼͲͻƦƩƚŷźĬźƷĻķǞğƷĻƩƭͼͲ
and/orͻƩĻƭƷƩźĭƷĻķ
ǞğƷĻƩƭͼasdefined);
c) Stabilizationisnotrequiredonconstructedbasecomponentsofroads,parking
lotsandsimilarsurfaces;
d) Stabilizationisnotrequiredontemporarystockpileswithoutsignificantsilt,clay
ororganiccomponents(e.g.,cleanaggregatestockpiles,demolitionconcrete
stockpiles,sandstockpiles)butpermitteesmustprovidesedimentcontrolsat
thebaseofthestockpile.
4) Allexposedsoilareaswithin200feetofthewater'sedge,andthatdraintoPublic
WatersthattheMinnesotaDNRhaspromulgated"workinwaterrestrictions"
duringspecifiedfishspawningtimeframes,mustbestabilizedwithin24hours
duringtherestrictionperiod;
5) Thenormalwettedperimeterofthelast200linearfeetoftemporaryorpermanent
drainageditchesorswalesthatdrainwaterfromthesitemustbestabilizedwithin
24hoursafterconnectingtoasurfacewaterorpropertyedge;
6) Stabilizationofremainingportionsoftemporaryorpermanentditchesorswales
mustbecompletedwithin14calendardays(orseven(7)calendardaysona
projectthatiswithinonemile(aerialradiusmeasurement)of,andflowsto,one
ormoreofthefollowing:ͻźƒƦğźƩĻķǞğƷĻƩƭͼͲͻƚƷŷĻƩspecialǞğƷĻƩƭͼͲͻƦƩƚŷźĬźƷĻķ
ǞğƷĻƩƭͼͲand/orͻƩĻƭƷƩźĭƷĻķǞğƷĻƩƭͼasdefined)afterconnectingtoasurface
waterorpropertyedgeandafterconstructioninthatportionoftheditch
temporarilyorpermanentlyceases;
7) Temporaryorpermanentditchesorswalesbeingusedasasedimentcontainment
systemduringconstruction(withproperlydesignedrockditchchecks,biorolls,silt
dikes,etc.)donotneedtobestabilized.Stabilizationoftheseareasmustbe
completedwithin24hoursaftertheiruseasasedimentcontainmentsystem
ceases;
8)Mulch,hydromulch,tackifier,polyacrylamideorsimilarerosionprevention
practicesmustnotbeusedwithinanyportionofthenormalwettedperimeterofa
temporaryorpermanentdrainageditchorswalesectionwithacontinuousslopeof
greaterthan2percent.Examplesofacceptableerosionpreventionpractices
includeblankets,poly,riprap,etc.;
9) Temporaryorpermanentenergydissipationmustbeprovidedatallpipeoutlets
within24hoursafterconnectiontoasurfacewaterorpermanentstormwater
treatmentsystem;and
10) Nomorelandcanbedisturbed(i.e.,phasing)thancanbeeffectively
inspectedandmaintainedinaccordancewithinspectionandmaintenance
requirements.
ii. SedimentControlPractices
1) SedimentcontrolBMPsmustbeestablishedonalldowngradientperimetersofthe
siteanddowngradientareasofthesitethatdraintoanysurfacewater,including
curbandguttersystems;
2) Sedimentcontrolpracticesmustbelocatedupgradientofanybufferzones;
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 8 of 23
3) Sedimentcontrolpracticesmustbeinstalledbeforeanyupgradientland
disturbingactivitiesbeginandmustbekeptinplaceuntilpermanentcoveris
established.Anysedimentcontrolmadeofsoilmustbetemporarilyor
permanentlystabilizedwithin24hrs.
4) Ifdowngradientsedimentcontrolsareoverloaded,basedonfrequentfailureor
excessivemaintenancerequirements,additionalupgradientsedimentcontrol
practicesorredundantBMPsmustbeinstalledtoeliminatetheoverloading.The
siteplanmustbeamendedtoidentifytheseadditionalpractices;
5) Temporaryorpermanentdrainageditchesandsedimentbasinsdesignedaspartof
asedimentcontainmentsystem(e.g.,ditcheswithrockcheckdams)require
sedimentcontrolpracticesonlyasappropriateforsiteconditions;
6) AfloatingsiltcurtainplacedinthewaterisnotasedimentcontrolBMPtosatisfy
perimetercontrolinthispartexceptwhenworkingonashorelineorbelowthe
waterline.Whenapplicable,aftertheconstructionactivity(e.g.,installationofrip
rapalongtheshoreline)inthatareaiscomplete,uplandperimetercontrolpractices
mustimmediatelybeinstalledifexposedsoilsstilldraintoasurfacewater;
7) Allsedimentcontrolpracticesadjustedorremovedtoaccommodateshortterm
activitiessuchasclearingorgrubbing,orpassageofvehicles,mustbereinstalled
immediatelyaftertheshorttermactivityiscompleted.Allsedimentcontrol
practicesmustbereinstalledbeforethenextprecipitationeventeveniftheshort
termactivityisnotcomplete;
8) AllstormdraininletsmustbeprotectedusingappropriateBMPsduringconstruction
untilpermanentcoverhasbeenestablishedonallareaswithpotentialfor
dischargingtotheinlet;
9) Inletprotectionforaparticularinletmayberemovedifaspecificsafetyconcern
(e.g.streetflooding/freezing)isidentified.Theneedforremovalmustbe
documentedinthesiteplan;
10) Siltfenceorothereffectivesedimentcontrolsmustbeprovidedatthebaseof
stockpilesonthedowngradientperimeterpriortotheinitiationofstockpiling;
11) Allstockpilesmustbelocatedoutsideofnaturalbuffersorsurfacewaters,including
stormwaterconveyancessuchascurbandguttersystemsunlessthereisabypassin
placeforthestormwater;
12) VehicletrackingBMPsmustbelocatedtominimizethetrackoutofsedimentfrom
theconstructionsiteorontopavedroadswithinthesite;
13) StreetsweepingmustbeusedinadditiontovehicletrackingBMPsifvehicletracking
BMPsarenotadequatetopreventsedimenttrackingontothestreet;
14) Temporarysedimentbasinsmustbeinstalledconsistentwithstandardsidentifiedin
Part2.d.(DesignCriteriaforTemporarySedimentBasins);
15) Inanyareasofthesitewherefinalvegetativestabilizationwilloccur,vehicleand
equipmentusemustberestrictedtominimizesoilcompaction;
16)Topsoilmustbepreservedonthesite;
17) DischargesfromBMPsmustbedirectedtovegetatedareasunlessinfeasible;
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 9 of 23
18)A50footnaturalbuffermustbepreservedor,ifabufferisinfeasibleonthesite,
redundant(double)perimetersedimentcontrolsmustbeprovidedwhenasurface
waterislocatedwithin50feetoftheproject'searthdisturbancesandstormwater
flowstothesurfacewater;
a) Permitteesmustinstallperimetersedimentcontrolsatleast5feetapartunless
limitedbylackofavailablespace;
b) Naturalbuffersarenotrequiredadjacenttoroadditches,judicialditches,
countyditches,stormwaterconveyancechannels,stormdraininlets,and
sedimentbasins;
c) Ifpreservingthebufferisinfeasible,thereasonsmustbedocumentedinthe
siteplan;
d) Sheetpilingandotherimpermeablebarriersinstalledinamannerthatretainsall
Stormwaterareconsideredredundantperimetercontrol.
19) Anundisturbedbufferzoneofnotlessthan100linearfeetmustbeincludedona
projectthatiswithinonemile(aerialradiusmeasurement)of,andflowstoͻƚƷŷĻƩ
specialǞğƷĻƩƭͼͲͻƦƩƚŷźĬźƷĻķǞğƷĻƩƭͼͲand/orͻƩĻƭƷƩźĭƷĻķǞğƷĻƩƭͼasdefined;
a) Thebufferzonemustbemaintainedatalltimes,bothduringconstructionand
asapermanentfeaturepostconstruction,exceptwhereawatercrossingor
otherencroachmentisnecessarytocompletetheproject;
b) Ifbufferencroachmentisnecessary,thecircumstance,reasons,andrestoration
activitiesmustbefullydocumentedinthesiteplan;
c) Allpotentialwaterquality,scenicandotherenvironmentalimpactsofthe
encroachmentsmustbeminimizedbytheuseofadditionalorredundant
(double)BMPs.AdditionalorredundantBMPsmustbedocumentedinthesite
plan.
20) Polymers,flocculants,orothersedimentationtreatmentchemicalsmustbeusedin
accordancewithacceptedengineeringpractices,dosingspecificationsandsediment
removaldesignspecificationsprovidedbythemanufacturerorsupplier.
21) Conventionalerosionandsedimentcontrolsmustbeusedpriortochemical
additionandmustdirecttreatedstormwatertoasedimentcontrolsystemfor
filtrationorsettlementoftheflocpriortodischarge.
iii. DewateringandBasinDraining
1) Turbidorsedimentladenwatersrelatedtodewateringorbasindraining(e.g.,
pumpeddischarges,trench/ditchcutsfordrainage)mustbedischargedtoa
sedimentcontrol(e.g.sedimenttraporbasin,filterbag)designedtoprevent
dischargeswithvisualturbidity.Totheextentfeasible,usewellvegetated
(e.g.grassyorwooded)uplandareaofthesitetoinfiltratedewateringwater
beforedischarge;
2) Receivingwaterscannotbeusedaspartofatreatmentarea;
3) Dischargesfromdewateringactivitiesmustbevisuallycheckedand
photographedatthebeginningandatleastonceevery24hoursofoperationto
ensuretreatmenthasbeenobtainedandnuisanceconditionswillnotresultfrom
thedischarge.Dewateringactivitiesthatonlylastforminutes,asopposedto
hoursanddonotreachasurfacewater,donotrequirephotographsor
documentation;
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 10 of 23
4) Ifnuisanceconditionsresultfromthedischarge,dewateringactivitiesmust
immediatelyceaseandcorrectiveactionsmustoccurbeforedewateringis
resumed.Nuisanceconditionsinclude,butisnotlimitedto,asedimentplumein
thereceivingwaterorthedischargeappearscloudy,oropaque,orhasavisible
contrast,orhasavisibleoilfilm,orcausesaquatichabitatdegradationthatcan
beidentifiedbyanobserver;
5) Anoilwaterseparatororsuitablefiltrationdevice(e.g.,cartridgefilters,absorbents
pads)mustbeusedpriortodischargeofwatercontainingoilorgrease;
6) Waterfromdewateringorbasindrainingactivitiesmustbedischargedinamanner
thatdoesnotcauseerosionorscourintheimmediatevicinityofdischargepoints;
7) Dewateringorbasindrainingactivitiescannotcauseinundationofwetlandsthat
causessignificantadverseimpacttothewetlandintheimmediatevicinityof
dischargepoints.
8) Iffilterswithbackwashwaterareused,allbackwashmustbehauled
awayfordisposal,returnedtothebeginningofthetreatmentprocess,or
incorporatedintothesiteinamannerthatdoesnotcauseerosion.
iv. InspectionandMaintenance
1) Atrainedpersonmustinspecttheentireconstructionsiteandareasadjacenttothe
siteatleastonceeveryseven(7)daysduringactiveconstruction,oreverythree(3)
calendardaysonaprojectthatiswithinonemile(aerialradiusmeasurement)of,
andflowstoaͻƦƩƚŷźĬźƷĻķǞğƷĻƩƭͼasdefined,andwithin24hoursafterarainfall
eventgreaterthan½inchin24hours;
2) AllpermanentstormwatertreatmentBMPsmustbeinspectedandmaintained;
3) AllerosionpreventionandsedimentcontrolBMPsandPollutionPrevention
ManagementMeasuresmustbeinspectedtoensureintegrityandeffectiveness.
4) AllnonfunctionalBMPsmustberepaired,replaced,orsupplementedwith
functionalBMPsbytheendofthenextbusinessdayafterdiscoveryunlessanother
timeframeisspecifiedbelow.Additionaltime,iffieldconditionspreventaccessto
thearea,maybetaken;
5) Surfacewaters,includingdrainageditchesandconveyancesystems,butnotcurb
andguttersystems,mustbeinspectedforevidenceoferosionandsediment
deposition.
a) Alldeltasandsedimentdepositedinareasadjacenttothesiteandinsurface
waters,includingdrainageways,catchbasins,andotherdrainagesystems
mustberemoved;
b) Allareaswheresedimentremovalresultedinexposedsoilsmustberestabilized.
Removalandstabilizationmustbecompletedwithinseven(7)calendardaysof
discoveryunlessprecludedbylegal,regulatory,orphysicalaccessconstraints;
c) Allreasonableeffortstoobtainaccessmustbeused;
d)Ifprecluded,removalandstabilizationmusttakeplacewithinseven(7)daysof
obtainingaccess;and
e) Contactalllocal,regional,stateandfederalauthoritiesandreceiveany
applicablepermits,priortoconductinganyworkinsurfacewaters;
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 11 of 23
6) Constructionsitevehicleexitlocations,streetsandcurbandguttersystemswithin
andadjacenttotheprojectmustbeinspectedforsedimentationfromerosionor
trackedsedimentfromvehicles.
a) Sedimentmustberemovedfromallpavedsurfaceswithinone(1)calendarday
ofdiscoveryor,ifapplicable,withinashortertimetoavoidasafetyhazardto
usersofpublicstreets;
7) Perimetercontroldevicesmustberepaired,replaced,orsupplementedwhenthey
becomenonfunctionalorthesedimentreaches½oftheheightofthedevice;
8) Whenthedepthofsedimentcollectedintemporaryandpermanentsedimentation
basinsreaches½thestoragevolume,thebasinsmustbedrainedandsediment
removed.Thismustoccurwithin72hoursofdiscovery;
9) Atleastoneindividualpresentonthesite(oravailabletotheprojectsiteinthree
(3)calendardays)mustbetrainedinthejobdutiesofoverseeingthe
implementationof,revisingand/oramendingthesiteplansandperforming
inspectionsfortheproject;
10) Inspectionschedulesmaybeadjustedasfollows:
a) Inspectionsofareaswithpermanentcovercanbereducedtooncepermonth,
evenifconstructionactivitycontinuesonotherportionsofthesite;or
b)Wheresiteshavepermanentcoveronallexposedsoilandnoconstruction
activityisoccurringanywhereonthesite,inspectionscanbereducedtoonce
permonthand,after12months,maybesuspendedcompletelyuntil
constructionactivityresumes.The CityofCenterville mayrequireinspections
toresumeifconditionswarrant;
c) hereconstructionactivityhasbeensuspendedduetofrozenground
conditions,inspectionsmaybesuspended.Inspectionsmustresumewithin24
hoursofrunoffoccurring,oruponresumingconstruction,whichevercomes
first;or
d) projectswhereapollinatorhabitatornativeprairietypevegetativecoverare
beingestablished,inspectionsmaybereducedtooncepermonthifthesitehas
temporaryvegetationwithadensityof70%uniformcover.Ifafter24months
nosignificanterosionproblemsareobserved,inspectionsmaybesuspended
completelyuntiltheterminationrequirementsidentifiedin2.c.vibeloware
met.
11) Inspectionsandmaintenanceactivitiesmustberecordedwithin24hoursofbeing
conductedandtheserecordsmustberetainedwiththesiteplan.Theserecords
mustinclude:
a) Dateandtimeofinspections;
b) Nameofperson(s)conductinginspections;
c) Accuratefindingsofinspections,includingthespecificlocationwhere
correctiveactionsareneeded;
d)Correctiveactionstaken(includingdates,times,andpartycompleting
maintenanceactivities);
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 12 of 23
e) Dateofallrainfalleventsgreaterthan½inchesin24hours,andtheamount
ofrainfallforeachevent.Rainfallamountsmustbeobtainedbyeithera
properlymaintainedraingaugeinstalledonsite,aweatherstationthatis
withinone(1)mileoftheƭźƷĻƭlocation,oraweatherreportingsystemthat
providessitespecificrainfalldatafromradarsummaries;
f) Photographsofdewateringactivities;
g) Observeddischargesmustberecorded,dischargesshouldbephotographed
andthelocationofthedischargedescribed(i.e.,color,odor,settledor
suspendedsolids,oilsheen,andotherobviousindicatorsofpollutants);and
h)Anyamendmentstothesiteplanproposedasaresultoftheinspectionmust
bedocumentedwithinseven(7)calendardays.
v.PollutionPreventionManagementMeasures
1) Constructionandlandscapematerialsmustbeplacedundercover(e.g.,plastic
sheetingortemporaryroofs)orprotectedbysimilarlyeffectivemeansasdesigned
tominimizecontactwithStormwater;
2) ProductswhichareeithernotasourceofcontaminationtoStormwaterordesigned
tobeexposedtoStormwaterarenotrequiredtobecoveredorprotected;
3) Pesticides,herbicides,fertilizersandtreatmentchemicalsmustbeplacedunder
cover(e.g.,plasticsheetingortemporaryroofs)orprotectedbysimilarlyeffective
meansdesignedtominimizecontactwithStormwater;
4) Hazardousmaterialsandtoxicwaste(includingoil,dieselfuel,gasoline,hydraulic
fluids,paintsolvents,petroleumbasedproducts,woodpreservatives,additives,
curingcompounds,andacids)mustbestoredinsealedcontainerstopreventspills,
leaksorotherdischarge;
5) HazardousmaterialsmustbestoredanddisposedofinaccordancewithMinn.R.ch.
7045;
6) Solidwastemustbestored,collected,anddisposedofinaccordancewithMinn.R.
ch.7035;
7) Portabletoiletsmustbepositionedsothattheyaresecureandwillnottiporbe
knockedover.
8) Sanitarywastefromtheportabletoiletsmustbeproperlydisposedinaccordance
withMinn.R.ch.7041;
9) Reasonablestepsmustbetakentopreventthedischargeofspilledorleaked
chemicals,includingfuel,fromanyareawherechemicalsorfuelwillbeloadedor
unloadedincludingtheuseofdrippansorabsorbentsunlessinfeasible;
a) Adequatesuppliesmustbeavailableatalltimestocleanupdischarged
materialsandanappropriatedisposalmethodmustbeavailableforrecovered
spilledmaterials;
b)SpillsmustbeimmediatelyreportedandcleanedupasrequiredbyMinn.Stat.
Sect.115.061,usingdrycleanupmeasureswherepossible.
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 13 of 23
10) Limitvehicleexteriorwashingandequipmenttoadefinedareaofthesite.
a) Runofffromthewashingareamustbecontainedinasedimentbasinorother
similarlyeffectivecontrols;
b)Wastefromthewashingactivitymustbedisposedofproperly;
c) Soaps,detergents,andsolventsmustbeproperlyusedandstored.
11) Liquidandsolidwastesgeneratedbywashoutoperations(e.g.concrete,stucco,
paint,formreleaseoils,curingcompoundsandotherconstructionmaterials)related
totheconstructionactivitymustbecontainedandnotcontacttheground.Asign,
indicatingthelocationofawashoutfacility,mustbeinstalled.
vi.TerminationConditions
1) Allconstructionactivitymustbecompletedandpermanentcovermustbeinstalled
overallareas;
a) Permanentcovermustconsistofauniformperennialvegetationwithadensity
of70percentofitsexpectedfinalgrowth;
b)Vegetationisnotrequiredwherethefunctionofaspecificareadictatesno
vegetation,suchasimpervioussurfacesorthebaseofasandfilter.
2) Permanentstormwatertreatmentsystemmustbecleanedofanyaccumulated
sediment;
a) Thesystemmustmeetallapplicablerequirementsandoperateasdesigned.
3) Sedimentmustberemovedfromconveyancesystem(s);
4) TemporarysyntheticerosionpreventionandsedimentcontrolBMPsmustbe
removed.BMPsdesignedtodecomposeonsitemaybeleftinplace;
5) Forresidentialconstructiononly,permitcoveragemaybeterminatedonindividual
lotsif:
a) Thestructure(s)arefinished,permanentcoverhasbeenestablished,andthelotis
soldtothehomeowner;or
b) Thestructure(s)arefinished,thelotissoldtothehomeowner,
temporaryerosionpreventionperimetercontrolsareproperlyinstalled
downgradientofanysoilswherepermanentcoverhasnotbeen
established,andthehomeownerisprovidedtheat/!ƭͻIƚƒĻƚǞƓĻƩ
Fact{ŷĻĻƷͼ͵
6) Forconstructionprojectsonagriculturalland(e.g.,pipelines
acrosscropland),thedisturbedlandmustbereturnedtoitspreconstruction
agriculturaluse.
d. DesignCriteriaforTemporarySedimentBasins ΝLƷĻƒƭЊВ͵ЌğƓķЊВ͵ЎΞ
i. Where10ormoreacresofdisturbedsoildraintoacommonlocationorwhere5ormore
acresofundisturbedsoildraintoacommonlocationontheprojectthatiswithinonemile
(aerialradiusmeasurement)ofanͻźƒƦğźƩĻķǞğƷĻƩƭͼͲͻƚƷŷĻƩspecialǞğƷĻƩƭͼͲͻƦƩƚŷźĬźƷĻķ
ǞğƷĻƩƭͼͲand/orͻƩĻƭƷƩźĭƷĻķǞğƷĻƩƭͼasdefined,theapplicantmustprovideabasinto
providetreatmentoftherunoffbeforeitleavestheconstructionsiteorenterssurface
waters.
ii. Temporarysedimentbasinsmaybeconvertedtoapermanentbasinafterconstructionis
complete.
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 14 of 23
iii. Temporarybasinsmayberemovedwhenpermanentcoverhasreducedtheacreageof
disturbedsoilstolessthan10(or5whenapplicable)acresdrainingtoacommonlocation.
iv. Mustprovidelivestorageforacalculatedvolumeofrunofffromatwo(2)year,24hour
stormfromeachacredrainedtothebasin,exceptthatinnocaseshallthebasinprovide
lessthan1,800cubicfeetoflivestorageperacredrainedtothebasin.
v. Wherethetwo(2)year,24hourstormrunoffamountisnotcalculated,thetemporary
sedimentbasinmustprovide3,600cubicfeetoflivestorageperacreoftheĬğƭźƓƭ
drainagearea.
vi. Outletsmustbedesignedtopreventshortcircuitingandthedischargeoffloatingdebris.
vii. Theoutletstructuremustbedesignedtowithdrawwaterfromthesurfacetominimize
thedischargeofpollutants.Theuseofasurfacewithdrawalmechanismmaybe
temporarilysuspendedduringfrozenconditions.Thebasinmustincludeastabilized
emergencyoverflowtopreventfailureofpondintegrity.
viii. Energydissipationmustbeprovidedforthebasinoutletwithin24hoursafterconnection
toasurfacewater.
ix. Temporarysedimentbasinsmustbesituatedoutsideofsurfacewatersandincludea
bufferzonenotlessthan100linearfeetfromspecialwaters.
x. Thetemporarybasinsmustbeconstructedandmadeoperationalpriortodisturbing10or
moreacresofsoildrainingtoacommonlocation.
xi. Whereatemporarysedimentbasinmeetingtheaboverequirementsisinfeasible,
effectivesedimentcontrolssuchassmallersedimentbasins,and/orsedimenttraps,silt
fences,vegetativebufferstrips,oranyappropriatecombinationofmeasuresmustbe
installedasdictatedbyindividualsiteconditions,includingalldownslopeboundariesand
sideslopeboundaries.Indeterminingwhetherinstallingasedimentbasinisinfeasible,
theowner/operator(s)mustconsiderpublicsafetyandmayconsiderfactorssuchassite,
soils,slope,andavailableareaonsite.Thedeterminationofinfeasibilitymustbe
documentedinthesiteplan.
3. PostConstructionStormwaterManagement
a. SubmittalofSitePlansconsistingofPostConstructionPlans ΝLƷĻƒƭЋЉ͵ЍͲЋЉ͵ЊАͲ
ğƓķЋЉ͵ЋЉΞ
i. Siteplansmustbesubmittedforreviewandconfirmationthatordinancerequirements
havebeenmet,priortostartofconstructionactivity.ΝLƷĻƒЋЉ͵ЍΞ
ii. Siteplansmustconsistof,ataminimum,thefollowingitems:ΝLƷĻƒЋЉ͵ЋЉΞ
1) Allcalculationsforthepermanentstormwatertreatmentsystem;
2) Thewaterqualityvolumethatwillbetreatedthroughvolumereductionpractices;
3) Rationaleanddocumentationsupportingthelocationofanyoffsitepermanent
stormwatertreatmentprojects;
4) Ifapplicable,theamountpaidtothe CityofCenterville forinlieuofoffsite
treatmentunderPart3.b.viiI.4.;and
5) AlllegalmechanismsrelatedtoPart3.c.(LongtermMaintenance).
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 15 of 23
b.PostConstructionStormwaterManagementBMPsmustmeetthe
followingcriteria:
i. Designedwithacceptedengineeringpracticesandinaccordancewithpart3.d.
(PermanentStormwaterManagementSystemDesignCriteria).ΝLƷĻƒЋЉ͵ЍΞ
ii.Designedsothatdischargesfromtheprojectduringandafterconstruction
activitiesdonotcauseaviolationofstatewaterqualitystandards,including
nuisanceconditions,erosioninreceivingchannelsorondownslope
properties,orasignificantadverseimpacttowetlandscausedbyinundation
ordecreaseofflow.
iii. Treatthewaterqualityvolumeonanyprojectwherethesumofthenewimpervious
surfaceandthefullyreconstructedimpervioussurfaceequalsoneormoreacres.ΝLƷĻƒ
ЋЉ͵ЎΞ
iv. Forconstructionactivity(excludinglinearprojects),waterqualityvolumemustbe
calculatedasone(1)inchtimesthesumofthenewandthefullyreconstructed
impervioussurface.ΝLƷĻƒЋЉ͵ЏΞ
v. Forlinearprojects,waterqualityvolumemustbecalculatedasthelargerofone(1)inch
timesthenewimpervioussurfaceoronehalf(0.5)inchtimesthesumofthenewandthe
fullyreconstructedimpervioussurface.Wheretheentirewaterqualityvolumecannotbe
treatedwithintheexistingrightofway,areasonableattempttoobtainadditionalright
ofway,easement,orotherpermissiontotreatthestormwaterduringtheproject
planningprocessmustbemade.Volumereductionpracticesmustbeconsideredfirst,as
describedinSection3.b.vi.Volumereductionpracticesarenotrequiredifthepractices
cannotbeprovidedcosteffectively.Ifadditionalrightofway,easements,orother
permissioncannotbeobtained,theowner/operatorofconstructionactivitymust
maximizethetreatmentofthewaterqualityvolumepriortodischargefrom theCityof
CentervillesMS4.ΝLƷĻƒЋЉ͵АΞ
vi. Volumereductionpractices(e.g.,infiltrationorother)toretainthewaterqualityvolume
onsitemustbeconsideredfirstwhendesigningthepermanentstormwatertreatment
system.Wetsedimentationbasinsandfiltrationsystemsarenotconsideredvolume
reductionpractices.Ifinfiltrationisprohibited,asdescribedinPart3.d.i.14.(Infiltration
System),othervolumereductionpractices,awetsedimentationbasin,orafiltrationbasin
maybeconsidered.ΝLƷĻƒЋЉ͵БΞ
vii.Fordischargestoatroutstream,thesystemmustbedesignedsothedischargefromthe
projectminimizesanyincreaseinthetemperatureoftroutstreamsresultingfromtheone
(1)ortwo(2)year24hourprecipitationevents.Thisincludesalltributariesofdesignated
troutstreamslocatedwithinthesamePublicLandSurveySystem(PLSS)Section.The
designmustincorporateoneormoreofthefollowingmeasures,inorderofpreference:
1) Providestormwaterinfiltrationorothervolumereductionpracticesasdescribedin
Part3.b.iii.,3.b.iv.,and3.b.v.above,toreducerunoff.Infiltrationsystemsmust
dischargeallstormwaterroutedtothesystemwithin24hours;
2) ProvidestormwaterfiltrationasdescribedinPart3.d.ii.(FiltrationSystem).Filtration
systemsmustdischargeallstormwaterroutedtothesystemwithin24hours;
3) Minimizethedischargefromconnectedimpervioussurfacesbydischargingto
vegetatedareas,orgrassswales,andthroughtheuseofothernonstructuralcontrols;
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 16 of 23
4) Ifpondingisused,thedesignmustincludeanappropriatecombinationofmeasures
suchasshading,vegetatedswaledischargesorconstructedwetlandtreatmentcells
thatlimittemperatureincreases.Thepondmustbedesignedasadrypondand
shoulddrawdownin24hoursorless;and
5) Othermethodsthatminimizeanyincreaseinthetemperatureofthetroutstream.
Note:Itemsvi.15areonlyrequiredifyouhavedischargestoatroutstreamwithinyourjurisdiction.
viii. OffsiteTreatment ΝLƷĻƒƭЋЉ͵ЊЉЋЉ͵ЊЍΞ
1) Fornonlinearprojects,wherethewaterqualityvolumecannotcosteffectivelybe
treatedonthesiteoftheoriginalconstructionactivity,theremainingwaterquality
volumemustbeaddressedthroughoffsitetreatmentandmeetthefollowing
requirements(mustbeselectedinthefollowingorderofpreference):
a) Locationsthatyieldbenefitstothesamereceivingwaterthatreceivesrunofffrom
theoriginalconstructionactivity.
b) LocationswithinthesameDNRcatchmentareaastheoriginalconstruction
activity.
c) LocationsinthenextadjacentDNRcatchmentareaupstream.
d) Locationsanywherewithinthe Cityof/ĻƓƷĻƩǝźƌƌĻƭ jurisdiction.
2) Offsitetreatmentprojectsmustinvolvethecreationofnewstructuralstormwater
BMPsortheretrofitofexistingstructuralstormwaterBMPs,ortheuseofaproperly
designedregionalstructuralstormwaterBMP.Routinemaintenanceofstructural
stormwaterBMPsownedoroperatedby theCityofCenterville cannotbeusedto
meetthisrequirement.
3) Offsitetreatmentprojectsmustbecompletednolaterthan
24monthsafterthestartoftheoriginalconstructionactivity.
4) Theapplicantmayprovidepaymenttothe CityofCenterville inlieuofoff
sitetreatment.
Note:Itemsviii.14arediscretionaryanditisuptotheMS4iftheywouldliketoallowtheseoffsitetreatment
optionswithintheirjurisdictionsandincludethemintheirordinance.However,
iftheMS4doesnotadoptthese
items,theexpectationisthatthewaterqualityvolumewillbetreatedonsite.
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 17 of 23
c. LongtermMaintenance ΝLƷĻƒЋЉ͵ЊЎΞ
i. The applicant mustenterintoalongtermmaintenanceagreementwith theCityof
Centerville thatdocumentsallresponsibilitiesforlongtermoperationandmaintenanceof
stormwatertreatmentpracticesthatarenotownedoroperatedby theCityofCenterville.At
aminimum,thelongtermmaintenanceagreementmustincludeprovisionsthat:
1)Allow theCityofCenterville toconductinspectionsofstructuralstormwaterBMPsnot
ownedoroperatedby theCityofCenterville,performnecessarymaintenance,and
assesscostsforthosestructuralstormwaterBMPswhen theCityofCenterville
determinestheownerofthatstructuralstormwaterBMPhasnotensuredproper
function;
2)Aredesignedtopreserve theCityofCentervillesrighttoensuremaintenance
responsibility,forstructuralstormwaterBMPsnotownedoroperatedby theCityof
Centerville,whenthoseresponsibilitiesarelegallytransferredtoanotherparty;and
3)Aredesignedtoprotect/preservestructuralstormwaterBMPs.Ifstructuralstormwater
BMPschange,causingdecreasedeffectiveness,new,repaired,orimprovedstructural
stormwaterBMPsmustbeimplementedtoprovideequivalenttreatmenttotheoriginal
BMP.
d. PermanentStormwaterManagementSystemDesignCriteria
i. InfiltrationSystem
1)Infiltrationoptionsinclude,butarenotlimitedto:infiltrationbasins,infiltration
trenches,rainwatergardens,bioretentionareaswithoutunderdrains,swaleswith
impermeablecheckdams,andnaturaldepressions;
2)Todetermineifaninfiltrationsystemissuitable,eithertheMPCA'scontamination
screeningchecklistmustbecompletedoranassessmentmustbeconducted.The
checklistorassessmentmustbedocumentedinthesiteplan.Formoreinformationand
toaccesstheMPCA's"contaminationscreeningchecklist"seetheMinnesota
StormwaterManual;
3) Mustbedesignedsuchthatpreexistinghydrologicconditionsofwetlandsinthevicinity
arenotimpacted(e.g.,inundationorbreachingaperchedwatertablesupportinga
wetland);
4) Mustnotbeexcavatedtofinalgrade,orwithinthree(3)feetoffinalgrade,untilthe
contributingdrainageareahasbeenconstructedandfullystabilizedunlesstheyprovide
rigorouserosionpreventionandsedimentcontrols(e.g.,diversionberms)tokeep
sedimentandrunoffcompletelyawayfromtheinfiltrationarea.
5) Whenexcavatingtowithinthree(3)feetoffinalgrade,the applicant muststakeoff
andmarktheareasoheavyconstructionvehiclesorequipmentdonotcompactthe
soilintheinfiltrationarea;
6) Apretreatmentdevicesuchasavegetatedfilterstrip,forebay,orwaterqualityinlet
(e.g.,gritchamber)toremovesolids,floatingmaterials,andoilandgreasefromthe
runoff,tothemaximumextentpracticable,mustbeusedbeforethesystemroutes
stormwatertotheinfiltrationsystem;
7) DesignedtoprovideawaterqualityvolumeasdescribedinSection3.b.iii,3.b.iv,and3.b.v;
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 18 of 23
8) Designedtodischargeallstormwater(includingstormwaterinexcessofthewater
qualityvolume)routedtothesystemthroughtheuppermostsoilsurfaceorengineered
mediasurfacewithin48hours.Additionalflowsthatcannotinfiltratewithin48hours
mustbypassthesystemthroughastabilizeddischargepoint;
9) Mustprovideameanstovisuallyverifytheinfiltrationsystemisdischargingthroughthe
soilsurfaceorfiltermediasurfacewithin48hoursorless;
10) Mustprovideatleastonesoilboring,testpitorinfiltrometertestinthelocationofthe
infiltrationpracticefordetermininginfiltrationrates;
11) Fordesignpurposes,dividefieldmeasuredinfiltrationratesby2asasafetyfactoror
usesoilboringresultswiththeinfiltrationratechartintheMinnesotaStormwater
Manualtodeterminedesigninfiltrationrates.WhensoilboringsindicatetypeAsoils,
fieldmeasurementsshouldbeperformedtoverifytherateisnotabove8.3inchesper
hour.
12) Mustemployappropriateonsitetestingtoensureaminimumofthree(3)feetof
separationfromtheseasonallysaturatedsoils(orfrombedrock)andthebottomofthe
proposedinfiltrationsystem;
13) Mustdesignamaintenanceaccess,typicallyeight(8)feetwide;
14) InfiltrationSystemsareprohibitedinthefollowingareas(See"higherlevelof
ΝLƷĻƒ
engineeringreview"intheMinnesotaStormwaterManualformoreinformation):
ЋЉ͵ВΞ
a) Areasthatthatreceiverunofffromvehiclefuelingandmaintenanceareas;
b) Areaswhereinfiltratingstormwatermaymobilizehighlevelsofcontaminantsin
soilorgroundwater;
c) Areaswheresoilinfiltrationratesarefieldmeasuredatmorethan8.3inchesper
hourunlessthesoilsareamendedtoslowtheinfiltrationratebelow8.3inches
perhour;
d) Areaswithlessthanthree(3)feetofseparationdistancefromthebottomofthe
infiltrationsystemtotheelevationoftheseasonallysaturatedsoilsorthetopof
bedrock;
e) AreasofpredominatelyHydrologicSoilGrouptypeDsoils(clay);
f) ThefollowingareaswithinaDrinkingWaterSupplyManagementArea(DWSMA)as
definedinMinn.R.4720.5100,subp.13:
i.InanEmergencyResponseArea(ERA)withinaDWSMAclassifiedas
havinghighorveryhighvulnerabilityasdefinedbytheMinnesota
DepartmentofHealth;or
ii. InanERAwithinaDWSMAclassifiedasmoderatevulnerabilityunlessa
higherlevelofengineeringreviewsufficienttoprovideafunctioning
treatmentsystemandtopreventadverseimpactstogroundwaterhas
beenapprovedbythe CityofCenterville;or
iii. OutsideofanERAwithinaDWSMAclassifiedashavinghighorveryhigh
vulnerabilityunlessahigherlevelofengineeringreviewsufficientto
provideafunctioningtreatmentsystemandtopreventadverseimpacts
togroundwaterhasbeenapprovedbythe CityofCenterville.
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 19 of 23
g) Areaswithin1,000feetupgradientor100feetdowngradientofactivekarst
features;and
h) Areasthatreceiverunofffromthefollowingindustrialfacilitiesnotauthorizedto
infiltratestormwaterundertheNPDESstormwaterpermitforindustrialactivities:
i. Automobilesalvageyards;
ii. Scraprecyclingandwasterecyclingfacilities;
iii. Hazardouswastetreatment,storage,ordisposalfacilities;
iv. Woodpreservingfacilities;or
v.Airtransportationfacilitiesthatconductdeicingactivities.
ii. FiltrationSystem
1) Filtrationoptionsinclude,butarenotlimitedto:sandfilterswithunderdrains,biofiltration
areas,swalesusingunderdrainswithimpermeablecheckdamsandundergroundsand
filters;
2) Mustnotinstallfiltermediauntilthecontributingdrainageareaisconstructedandfully
stabilizedunlesstheyproviderigorouserosionpreventionandsedimentcontrols(e.g.,
diversionberms)tokeepsedimentandrunoffcompletelyawayfromthefiltrationarea;
3) Designedtoremoveatleast80percentofTSS;
4) Mustuseapretreatmentdevicesuchasavegetatedfilterstrip,smallsedimentation
basin,waterqualityinlet,forebayorhydrodynamicseparatortoremovesettleablesolids,
floatingmaterials,andoilsandgreasefromtherunofftothemaximumextentpracticable,
beforerunoffentersthefiltrationsystem;
5) DesignedtoprovideawaterqualityvolumeasdescribedinSection3.b.iii,3.b.iv,and3.b.v;
6) Designedtodischargeallstormwater(includingstormwaterinexcessofthewaterquality
volume)routedtothesystemthroughtheuppermostsoilsurfaceorengineeredmedia
surfacewithin48hours.Additionalflowsthatthesystemcannotfilterwithin48hours
mustbypassthesystemordischargethroughanemergencyoverflow;
7) Designedtoprovideameanstovisuallyverifythesystemisdischargingthroughthesoil
surfaceorfiltermediawithin48hours;
8) Employappropriateonsitetestingtoensureaminimumofthree(3)feetofseparation
betweentheseasonallysaturatedsoils(orfrombedrock)andthebottomoftheproposed
filtrationsystem;
9) Constructwithanimpermeablelinerwhenthesystemhaslessthanthree(3)feetof
separationbetweenseasonallysaturatedsoilsorbedrock;
10) Designedwithamaintenanceaccess,typicallyeight(8)feetwide.
iii. WetSedimentationBasin
1) Permanentvolumeof1,800cubicfeetofstoragebelowtheoutletpipeforeachacrethat
drainstothebasin;
2) Permanentvolumemustreachaminimumdepthofatleastthree(3)feetandmusthave
nodepthgreaterthan10feet;
3) Mustbeconfiguredtominimizescourorresuspensionofsolids;
4) Inadditiontothepermanentvolume,thebasinmustprovidethewaterqualityvolumeas
livestorage.WaterqualityvolumeisdescribedinSection3.b.iii,3.b.iv,and3.b.v;
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 20 of 23
5) Waterqualityvolumedischargesatnomorethan5.66cubicfeetpersecond(cfs)peracre
ofsurfaceareaofthebasin;
6) Designedtopreventshortcircuitingandthedischargeoffloatingdebris;
7) Basinoutletsmusthaveenergydissipation;
8) Mustincludeastabilizedemergencyoverflowtoaccommodatestormeventsinexcessof
thebasin'shydraulicdesign;
9) Musthaveamaintenanceaccess,typicallyeight(8)feetwide,forthebasin;
10) Mustbelocatedoutsideofsurfacewatersandanybufferzonesidentifiedinpart2.c.ii.
(SedimentControlPractices).
11) Permitteesmustdesignbasinsusinganimpermeablelineriflocatedwithinactivekarst
terrain.
iv. RegionalWetSedimentationBasins
1) Whentheentirewaterqualityvolumecannotbetreatedbyvolumereductionpractices
onsite,regionalwetsedimentationbasinscanbeusedorcreated,providedtheyare
constructedbasins,notanaturalwetlandorwaterbody.
2) Theregionalbasinconformstoallrequirementsforawetsedimentationbasinas
describedinPart3.d.iii.(WetSedimentationBasin)
3) Mustbelargeenoughtoaccountfortheentireareathatdrainstothebasin.
4) Waterwaysbetweentheprojectandtheregionalbasinmustnotbesignificantly
degraded.
5) Writtenauthorizationfrom theCityofCenterville orprivateentitythatownsand
maintainstheregionalbasin.
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 21 of 23
4. RightofEntry
a. The applicant mustallow theCityofCenterville andtheirauthorizedrepresentativestoenter
allpropertiesatanyreasonabletimeforthepurposesofinspection,observation,
measurement,samplingandtestingpertinenttodischargetotheMS4asoftenasmaybe
reasonablynecessarytodeterminecompliance.Theseactivitiesinclude,butarenotlimitedto,
thefollowing:
i. Conductinginvestigationsorsurveys.
ii. Examiningandcopyinganybooks,papers,records,ormemorandapertainingtoactivitiesor
recordsrequiredtobekeptunderthetermsandconditionsofthepermittedactivity.
iii. Inspectingtherequirementsofthisordinance.
iv. Samplingandmonitoringanyitemsoractivitiespertainingtothisordinance.
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 22 of 23
5. Violations/Penalty/Enforcement
a.Enforcementpowers:Whena/an applicant failstoconformtoanyprovisionofthisordinance
withinthetimestipulated,theCityofCenterville maytakethefollowingactions:
i.Issueastopworkorder,withholdtheschedulingofinspections,and/orwithholdthe
issuanceofaCertificateofOccupancy.
ii. Suspendorrevokeanypermitissuedby theCityofCenterville totheowner/operatorfor
thesiteinquestionoranyotheroftheƚǞƓĻƩΉƚƦĻƩğƷƚƩsiteswithinthe\[NAMEOFMS4\]ƭ
jurisdiction.
iii. Ifcircumstancesexistsuchthatnoncompliancewiththisordinanceposesanimmediate
dangertothepublichealth,safetyandwelfare,asdeterminedby theCityofCenterville,
maytakeemergencypreventativeactiontocorrectthedeficiencyorhireanindependent
contractortocorrectthedeficiency.Theissuanceofapermitconstitutesarightofentry
for theCityofCenterville toenteruponthesiteforthepurposeofcorrectingdeficiencies.
iv. Requirereimbursementto theCityofCenterville forallcostsincurredincorrectingstorm
waterpollutioncontroldeficiencies.Ifpaymentisnotmadewithin 30 daysaftercostsare
incurredby theCityofCenterville,then theCityofCenterville mayassesstheremaining
amountagainsttheproperty.Asaconditionofthepermit,the applicant shallwaivenotice
ofanyassessmenthearingtobeconductedby theCityofCenterville,agreethatthebenefit
tothepropertyexceedstheamountoftheproposedassessment,andwaiveallrightsby
virtueofMinnesotaStatute429.081tochallengetheamountorvalidityofsuchassessment
costsrelatedtocleanuporcorrectiveactionstakenby theCityofCenterville.
March2024|wqstrm498
Page 23 of 23
CITY OF CENTERVILLEREQUEST
FOR ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: RequestedMeetingDate:
June 4, 2024
Planning and Zoning
VI.1
TITLE OF ISSUE:
LaLonde First Addition - Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
See the attached memo and supporting documentation.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
N/A
REQUESTED ACTION:
Motion to approve the LaLonde First Addition preliminary plat and conditional use permit for a planned unit
development with the findings outlined in the staff memo.
For ClerkÓs Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
staff memo & supporting documentation
Other (specify) ____________
______________________________________________________________
_____
_______________________________________________________________
Refer to: _________________________________
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Consent
Other: ___________________________________
Regular
–
o
e have re-
the overall height
size
is
in
o
-
o
58
-
–
o +
plan.
on the property
o
the lowers .
-
o The area within one
T
- within 50 feet of
no .
.
–
o with the
to
the
o
-
Granite Works I, Delano – 1 entrance for 70 units
Granit Works II, Delano – 1 entrance for 75 units
The Emery, Farmington – 1 entrance for 74 units
Boatworks Commons, White Bear Lake – 1 entrance for 83 units
The Isaac, Roseville – 1 entrance for 127 units
The Oasis at Twin Lakes, Roseville – 2 buildings totaling 228 units with 1 garage
entrance each
Harbor at Twin Lakes, Roseville – 1 entrance for 277 units
– 1 entrance for 105 units
Fredrik, Rogers – 1 entrance for 165 units
Forte on the Park, Minneapolis – 1 entrance for 225 units
The Asher, Minneapolis – 1 entrance for 175 units
– a
o the
– -
o
o -
o
o Yes.
o
o
lessening the
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
Y
JR
JM
EHEH
R 57177
CENTERVILLE, MN 55038
23665
A
------------
1687 WESTVIEW STREET
N
I
LIC. NO.
04.02.2024
COMPLEX
M
I
L
CENTERVILLE MULTI-FAMILY APARTMENT
----
E
C-603
R
SITE PLANS
P
specification, or report wasdirect supervision and that I ama duly Licensed ProfessionalState of Minnesota.ERIK HEDMANDATE:
I hereby certify that this plan,prepared by me or under myEngineer under the laws of the engineering, inc.
moore
DATE:REV DATE:REV NUM:RECORD:PROJECT No.MANAGER:DESIGNER:DRAFTER:REVIEWER:
20
S
N
Scale in Feet
0
WE
S.C.E.
S.C.E.
52'-1 3/4"
Front of buildingon 3rd floor
Front of building
Area beingstepped backon the 3rd floor.
Area of thebuilding movedfrom the northleg.
Area of thebuilding movingto the south legof the building.
FILE LOCATION: R:\\Projects\\23000\\23600\\23665\\CIVIL\\PRODUCTION\\23665_Grading & Erosion Control.dwg
733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000, Minneapolis, MN 55402
Planning Report
DATE:June 4, 2024
TO:Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM:Phil Carlson, AICP, Stantec
APPLICANT:Jacob Budenski, Ten Nineteen Development LLC
REQUEST:PUD Preliminary Development Plan
ADDRESS: 1687 Westview Street
PID:23-31-22-22-0003
OWNER:Estate of William J. LaLonde
INTRODUCTION
At the May 7, 2024 meeting, the Planning and Zoning
Commission reviewed the planned unit development (PUD)
for the LaLonde property on Westview Street at the north end
of downtown Centerville proposed by Ten Nineteen
Development fora 104-unit luxury market-rate apartment
buildingand continued the item to thisJune 4 meeting.
The Commission heard comments from a number of people
in person and in writing. We suggest three approaches the
Commission could take in making a recommendation to the
City Council on the request:
1)Approval with Conditions (Staff Recommendation)
2)Approval with Enhanced Conditions
3)Denial
Any recommendation needs to have findings of fact supporting the decision, which are outlined
in the suggested options below.
June 4, 2024
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 2 of 11
RE: Ten Nineteen Development LLC, LaLonde Property, PUD Preliminary Development Plan
1)Approval with Conditions (Staff Recommendation)
This approach is essentially what was includedin our May 7 report to the Planning and Zoning
Commission, repeated here, butwith revisionsbased on input at the public hearing.
Conditions for Approval(Staff Recommendation)
1)The design of the building façade will be revised to include additional details that evoke
historic French-Canadian architecture, to be reviewed and approved by the City Planner
and City Engineer.
2)The lower level of the west façade of the building will be revised to include more
architectural detailing instead of a blank decorative block wall, to be reviewed and
approved by the City Planner and City Engineer.
3)Due to concerns over the height of the building adjacent to the existing single family
neighbors to the north, the north leg of the apartment building will be shortened by two
units per floor and the westernmost two units on the upper floor will be removed,
compared to the original design of three stories of apartments over parking.
4)Development Agreement - The applicant will enter into a development agreement for all
aspects of site construction and engineering to be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer and City Attorney.
5)Final construction plans will be subject to review and approval from the City Engineer.
6)Screening – The Subject Property shall provide a fence on the east and north sidesof
sufficient height and lengthbe maintained with sufficient screening or fencingto stop light
from leaving the site from vehicles entering and exiting the parking lot andparking
garage, and in a manner coordinated withthe landscape plan. The fence on the east
side of the property shall serve to screen the elementary school from the apartment’s
surface parking lot.
7)Garbage – If garbage containers are stored on sitetheyGarbage containersshall be
screened from public view. Garbage hauling shall be coordinated to not interfere with
school bus traffic from Centerville ElementarySchool. All garbage shall be contained
within garbage containers designed for that purpose. The grounds of the subject property
shall be maintained in a manner that is free from litter and garbage.
8)Exterior Conditions – The Subject Property shall be maintained in a neat and workmanlike
order to include, but not limited to:
a.The original landscape, grading, and lighting plans shall be maintained.
June 4, 2024
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 3 of 11
RE: Ten Nineteen Development LLC, LaLonde Property, PUD Preliminary Development Plan
b.Lawn, shrubbery, trees, and planting areas shallbe maintained in conformity with
City standards, and dead plantings shall be replaced.
c.Painted surfaces shall be free from pealing, cracking, or fading.
d.Pavement, curb, and sidewalk shall be free from potholes and major damage as so
deemed by the City Engineer.
e.Lane lines and markings for parking, driveways, and fire lanes shall be clearly visible
by painting or marking.
f.Exterior lighting shall function as designed and illuminate areas from dusk until
dawn, and such light shall not pollute areas off of the subject property.
9)Snow Removal – Snow removal operations shall utilize snow storage locations only on the
Subject Property or hauled off site in a manner that complies with local regulations. Allfire
lanes and means of fire access on the Subject Property shall be cleared of ice and snow
within 24-hours from the end of snowfall.
10)Parking – Vehicle parking by residents and guests shall be confined to the parking areas on
the Subject Property. No vehicles from the site shall park on public streets north of Main
Street. If development’s residents or guests are regularly utilizing area streets or other
privately held parking lots for overflow parking, whether legal or illegal, the City reserves
the right to make adjustments to the operation of the building and site to mitigate the issue
until no off-site parking is being utilized.
11)Proof of parking shall be shown on a site plan to be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer that would provide the number of parking spaces required to obtain a 1.8:1 ratio.
An escrow will be provided to the City for three years to allow construction of additional
parking spaces if, in the opinion of the City Council, there are parking problems warranting
additional parking on site.
12)No working on/repairing cars or other vehicles or equipment inthe parking lot.
13)No oversized vehicles are allowed in the parking lot or taking up more than one space per
vehicle.
14)Outside Storage – No Outside Storage, as defined by Ordinance,is permitted on the
Subject Property other than customary furniture and equipment on the patio or on the
individual unit balconies.
15)Construction-related traffic is prohibited from using Westview Street during drop-off and
pickup times at Centerville Elementary School, to be coordinated with a written plan
developed by the City Administrator, the school administration, and the contractor.
16)The parking lot and site plan layout included in the final plans will be subject to the review
and approval of the Fire Chief, ensuring adequate space to maneuver public safety
vehicles.
June 4, 2024
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 4 of 11
RE: Ten Nineteen Development LLC, LaLonde Property, PUD Preliminary Development Plan
17)Disturbances Prohibited – The Subject Property, or users thereof, shall not produce noise,
vibrations, air pollution, light pollution, fire hazards, or noxious emissions which disturb,
endanger, or offend neighboring properties or the public.
18)Public Nuisances Prohibited - The Subject Property, or users thereof, shall not create or
maintain a public nuisance or disorderly conduct, as defined pursuant to the City’s Code
of Ordinances or pursuant to State Law.
a.The City deems it to be a public nuisance to smoke, vape, or drink intoxicating
beverages within sight of the elementary school property or its students.
Accordingly, these activities are not permitted on the eastside of the apartment
building.
b.The City deems it to be a public nuisance to loiter in the vicinity of the elementary
school or its students. Accordingly, loitering is not permitted on or from the subject
property.
c.The City deems it to be a public nuisance for conditions to exist on the subject
property which cause the excessive use of law enforcement or emergency
services.
d.The City deems it to be a public nuisance for conditions to exist on the subject
property which allow persons to cross Main Street to or from the west side of the
subject property.
19)Permits - Landowner will follow the applicable standards and requirements of the City of
Centerville City Code, Rice Creek Watershed District, Anoka County, Army Corp of
Engineers, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources, and any other agency having jurisdiction over the Subject Property. Landowner
shall grant and allow access by city and other agency personnel to inspect the subject
premises for compliance with the aforementioned Permits.
20)Legal Compliance – The Subject Property shall be kept in compliance with, and
Landowner will obey all laws and regulation necessary to operate this building, and will
obtain and maintain, in good standing, all licenses or permits necessary to operate this
type of facility.
21)Apartmentleases shall be no less than twelve months to provide more long-term residents
and fewer transients. All leases will be with the apartment management company; no sub-
leases will be permitted.
Findings of Fact for Approval(Staff Recommendation)
1)The Estate of William J. LaLonde owns the property at 1687 Westview Street, legally
described now as in Lot 4, Auditor’s Subdivision 48 Revised, being a part of the NW ¼ of
Section 23, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota; described by Anoka County
June 4, 2024
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 5 of 11
RE: Ten Nineteen Development LLC, LaLonde Property, PUD Preliminary Development Plan
with PID 23-31-22-22-0003. The property is being replatted with this approval as Lot 1 and
Lot 2 Block 1 of LaLonde First Addition.
2)Ten Nineteen Development LLC has proposed a 104-unit apartment project on the
property, consisting of a three-story apartment building with a level of parking underneath
the building for 110 cars and a surface parking lot of 56 spaces.The parking provided
results in about 1.6 parking spaces per unit which is typical and adequate per current
industry standardsand practice.
3)The project is proposed as a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development under
the standards and processes in the Centerville Zoning Code.
4)The property is zoned M-2 Mixed Use Neighborhood, which references the 2006 Master
Plan & Development Guidelines, noting that the M-2 district correlates to the “Downtown
Neighborhood” designation in the Master Plan.Page 26 of the Master Plan notes that “the
Downtown Neighborhood will be dominated by high-density and medium density
residential developments” with density that will range from 20 to 45 units per acre.The
project meets this standard.
5)The Centerville Zoning Code defines the height of a building as “The vertical distance from
the average elevation of the finished grade at the front of the building to the highest point
of the roof for flat roofs . . .”, and further limits the height of the building to 35 feet. The
proposed building has a finished grade of about elevation 915 at the front of the building
and a roof elevation of 950, for a total height calculated as 35 feet, meeting the Code
definition and standard.
6)The project as conditioned meets the M-2 zoning district standards in Section156.052, the
standards for approving a Conditional Use Permit in Section 156.210, and the standards for
approving a Planned Unit Development in Section 156.252(A).The public benefits from
approving the PUD include the diversification of housing choices in the community, adding
population to support businessesand initiating revitalization of the city’s Downtown,
encouraging further investmentin the Downtown and the community generally..
7)The project is in close proximity toCenterville Elementary School. Safety of the students and
school-related traffic are critical issues for the school and the community. It is important to
create a safe area in the vicinity of the school. Residents and visitors to the project site
must travel along the same route as pedestrians, bicycles, bus traffic, and other traffic
accessing the school. Traffic around the school is particularly busy at the beginning and
end of each school day and during school events.A traffic study for the project prepared
by a qualified consultant concluded that traffic from the development will not degrade
nearby intersection performance and traffic safety below acceptable standards. The City
finds the project will not pose a risk to the safety and enjoyment of the adjacent school
environment and its students.
June 4, 2024
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 6 of 11
RE: Ten Nineteen Development LLC, LaLonde Property, PUD Preliminary Development Plan
8)The project will have manyresidents and guests on site who will reasonably have a desire
to walk, bike, or drive in the vicinity.
9)The project will be the first major development in Downtown Centerville and will be
expected to “reinforce and guide public/private investment in a manner that will
strengthen the viability of the area and recommend Downtown Centerville as a
community destination of the highest quality”, in the words of the Downtown Centerville
Master Plan & Development Guidelines. As such, the project must be clean, orderly, and
well managed.
10)Main Street immediately adjacent to the west edge of the project site is a busy, high-traffic
roadway with no safe pedestrian crossing to Centerville Lake. The project will have views of
the lake, but no reasonable direct access.
June 4, 2024
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 7 of 11
RE: Ten Nineteen Development LLC, LaLonde Property, PUD Preliminary Development Plan
2)Approval with Enhanced Conditions
This approach is based on our May 7 report recommendations to the Planning and Zoning
Commission, with the revisions as abovein Option 1), but with added conditionsthat the
Commission may want to consider.
Conditions for Approval(Enhanced Conditions)
\[Conditions 1-20 the same as previous\]
21)Balconies shall be constructed of wrought iron vs. aluminum or other material, in keeping
the Downtown Master Plan preference for that material.
22)Due to concerns about overcrowding, occupancy in theapartment units will be limited to
three times the number of bedrooms in eachunit.
23)Proof of parking shall be shown on a site plan to be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer that would provide the required number of parking spacesper city code.An
escrow will be provided to the Cityfor three years to allow construction of additional
parking spaces if, in the opinion of the City Council, there are parking problems warranting
additional parking on site.
Findings of Fact for Approval(Enhanced Conditions)
\[Findings 1-9 as above in Option 1, with added findings\]
11)Concerns over parking and traffic safety issues are a valid reason for providing adequate
on-site parking for the project.
12)Overcrowding of apartment unitsis a valid concern for the health, safety and welfare of
apartment residents as well as for congestion in the neighborhood.
June 4, 2024
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 8 of 11
RE: Ten Nineteen Development LLC, LaLonde Property, PUD Preliminary Development Plan
3)Denial
Findings of Fact for Denial
\[Same as above, with additionsand deletions\]
1)The Estate of William J. LaLonde owns the property at 1687 Westview Street, legally
described now as in Lot 4, Auditor’s Subdivision 48 Revised, being a part of the NW ¼ of
Section 23, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota; described by Anoka County
with PID 23-31-22-22-0003. The property is proposed to bebeingplatted with this approval
as Lot 1 and Lot 2 Block 1 of LaLonde First Addition.
2)Ten Nineteen Development LLC has proposed a 104-unit apartment project on the
property, consisting of a three-story apartment building with a level of parking underneath
the building for 110 cars and a surface parking lot of 56 spaces, for a total of 166 spaces.
The Zoning Code minimum standard for residential parking in Section 156.166(A) is two
spaces per unit, which is 208 spaces for the 104-unit proposed project. The project does not
meet this standard, being short by 42 spaces.
3)The height of the proposed building would be about 35 feet as defined in the Centerville
Zoning Code but would appear 48 feet in height on the north side due to the lower ground
level at the northwest corner of the building. This is unreasonably tall and not compatible
with the surrounding neighborhood.
4)The project is proposed as a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development under
the standards and processes in the Centerville Zoning Code.
5)The project does not meet the M-2 zoning district standards in Section156.052, which
incorporate by reference the standards in the 2006 Master Plan & Development
Guidelines,specifically:
a.The height and mass of the building do not “protect the integrity of the surrounding
residential neighborhoods”.
b.The design of the building is not consistent with the architectural design standards
in the above reference Master Plan.
c.The Master Plan limits projects to three stories, whereas the proposed project would
rise more than three levels on the west and north sides.
6)The project is in close proximity toCenterville Elementary School. Safety of the students and
school-related traffic are critical issues for the school and the community. It is important to
create a safe area in the vicinity of the school. Residents and visitors to the project site
must travel along the same route as pedestrians, bicycles, bus traffic, and other traffic
June 4, 2024
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 9 of 11
RE: Ten Nineteen Development LLC, LaLonde Property, PUD Preliminary Development Plan
accessing the school. Traffic around the school is particularly busy at the beginning and
end of each school day and during school events.
n page 20 notes that the “Downtown Neighborhood” is reserved for low-
7)The Master Plan o
to mid-rise housing. The City Council find that the proposed project of three to four levels
and over 40 feet in height does not fit this description.
8)The City’s Comprehensive Planin the housing policies section has a goal to “protect
residential neighborhoods from incompatible and offensive uses” and to “identify areas
appropriate for multiple family . . . housing opportunities.” The LaLonde property is
incompatible and inappropriate for this scale and size of project considering its proximity to
the elementary school and adjacent single family uses.
has not presented enoughinformation as to the public benefit of the PUD. The
9)Applicant
public benefits do not outweigh the relaxation of standards being requested.
10)Main Street immediately adjacent to the west edge of the project site is a busy, high-traffic
roadway with no safe pedestrian crossing to Centerville Lake. The project will have views of
the lake, but no reasonable direct access.This will be an attractive nuisancewith no
reasonable way to stop it.
60-DAY DEADLINE
Theapplication was submitted April 8, 2024. The initial deadline for final action by the City Council
was June 8, 2024. The city has corresponded with the developer, notifying them that a 60-day
extension is required for further analysis, as permitted under Minnesota Statute 15.99. The
preliminary plat has a separate 120-day deadline per Minnesota Statute 462.358 Subd. 3b. Both
deadlines are nowup on August 7, 2024. Further extensions are not permissible without consent
from the developer and landowner. A decision must be made by this deadline or the
applications will be deemed approved.
Centerville Apartments Centerville Apartments Site PlanConcept Perspective
(Momentum Design Group(Momentum Design Group))
June 4, 2024
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 10of 11
RE: Ten Nineteen Development LLC, LaLonde Property, PUD PreliminaryDevelopment Plan
§ 156.052 MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT (M-2).
(A)Purpose. It is intended that the M-2 District implement the “Master Plan and Development Guidelines for
Downtown Centerville,” adopted by the City Council on January 11, 2006 (“The Redevelopment Plan”), and
provide for higher density residential uses and accessory retain and office uses to complement the adjoining
M-1 District and existing neighborhoods. The M-2 District correlates to the “Downtown Neighborhood”
designation in the Redevelopment Plan.
(B)Permitted Uses. See Table 156-A.1
(1)Residential uses with a density between 12 and 45units per acre.
(2)Ground level retail or offices.
(C)Special Requirements. The following special requirements are intended to implement the Redevelopment
plan, which is incorporated herein by reference.
(1)Existing uses that are not in conformance with this section may not be expanded, but may continue
as nonconforming uses. Additions to a nonconforming single-family residential structure may be
allowed, provided the square footage of the main floor of the home is notincreased by more than
33% from that which existed on January 11, 2006. Also, accessorybuildings or uncovered decks and
porches may be constructed in conjunction withnonconforming single-family uses, provided they
meet all of the conditions, including setbacks,as required in the R-2 Single Family District.
(2)In making decisions about land use compatibility and dimensional criteria for uses andstructures,
the City shall have broad discretion to protect the public health, safety and welfare;and to protect
the integrity of the M-2 District, adjacent M-1 District and surrounding residentialneighborhoods.
Redevelopment of any parcel shall be accomplished by submitting application asa Planned Unit
Development.
(3)Driveway access to any use shall not be permitted from Centerville Road or Main Street butrather
planned side streets and alleys must be used for such access.
(4)The Redevelopment Plan establishes a shared parking plan. Applicants for permits shall indicate
how they will conform to the parking plan, including potential dedication of property for shared
parking or public parking lots. The city shall have broad discretion in determining whether toaccept
ownership and maintenance of shared parking facilities. Maintenance of public parkingand other
public facilities may be accomplished through creation of a Downtown Service Districtand may
include maintenance assessments or user fees.
(5)The architectural design and exterior building materials used in connection with any new or
expanded use or structure shall be consistent with any architectural design or aesthetic control
requirements established by the Redevelopment Plan. The City will engage the services of a
consultant architect to assist with the review. The cost of such services may be charged to the
applicant.
. . . .
June 4, 2024
Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 11of 11
RE: Ten Nineteen Development LLC, LaLonde Property, PUD PreliminaryDevelopment Plan
CONDITIONALUSE PERMIT STANDARDS
156.210.A conditional or interim use permit shall be required of all planned unit developments. The city may
approve the PUD only if it finds the development satisfies all the following standards:
(A)The development shall be planned so that it is consistent with the city comprehensive plan;
(B)The PUD is an effective and unified treatment of the development possibilities on the project site andthe
development plan provides for the preservation of unique natural amenities such as streams, streambanks,
wooded cover, rough terrain and similar areas;
(C)The planned unit development proposal appears to harmonize with both existing and proposed development
in the area surrounding the project site;
(D)The tract of land shall be under unified control at the time of application and scheduled to be developed as
one unit. In addition, the development plan must include provisions for the preservation of natural amenities;
(E)Each phase of the proposed development, as it is proposed to be completed, is of sufficient size, composition
and arrangement that its construction, marketing and operation are feasible as a complete unit, and that
provision and construction of dwelling units and common open space are balanced and coordinated;
(F)The PUD will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities andutilities
which serve or are proposed to serve the district;
(G)The proposed total development is designed in a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment
within its own boundaries;
(H)The plans required under this section must be submitted in a form which will satisfy the requirements of
Chapter 153 for the preliminary and final plats;
(I)Permission to develop specific parcels of land under the provisions which follow shall be binding on all
construction. Any change in the development plan after approval by the City Council shall beresubmitted for
consideration; and
(J)Subdivision review under the subdivision chapter shall be carried out simultaneously with the review ofa
PUD under this section.
. . . .
PUD STANDARDS
156.252(A).In its recommendations the Commission shall determine whether the proposed PUD is consistent with the
objectives for PUDs specified in § 156.065 and with the comprehensive land use plan of the city; and whether the
benefits, combination of various land uses, if proposed, and the interrelationship with the land uses in the surrounding
area justify the deviation from standard district regulations allowed by this chapter for PUDs.
Date: May 24, 2024
To: Mark Statz, Centerville City Administrator
Athanasia Lewis, Centerville Assistant City Administrator
From: Jeff Holmberg, Superintendent of Centennial Schools
Re: Centerville Elementary Projected Enrollment Trend
Centennial Schools has been developing a long-range plan for the school district by looking at current
district enrollment and demographic information and examining district facilities relative to providing
space for current and future programming opportunities for students and serving our communities.
Considering the proposed apartment building on the LaLonde Property, and upon your request, the
district has reviewed projected enrollment trends for the Centerville attendance area. The school
district asked TeamWorks International to evaluate the impact on enrollment a proposed 104-unit
apartment complex would have on Centerville Elementary School. The report from TeamWorks
International indicated that the student yield from this type of housing is calculated at .25 students
per unit, giving the potential for an additional 26 students within the Centerville boundary.
Notably, the student yield from the proposed apartment complex would include elementary, middle,
and high school students in this projection. It would likely be spread out over multiple levels and
grade levels.
Centennial will continue to monitor student enrollment projections annually, relative to community
growth and development, and adjust our long-range plan to serve our communities and students.
CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT
2 East Road, Circle Pines, MN 55014| Main: 651-792-7900
H ONOR •P RIDE •I NTEGRITY •P ROFESSIONALISM
th
Wednesday, April 10, 2024
Mark Statz
City of Centerville
1880 Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038
The Centennial Fire District hasreviewed the documents for the proposed apartment complex located at
1687 Westview Street in Centerville. There are a few items inquestionsstated below:
Outdoor Fire Pits
o Is there exact locations and dimensions for the outdoor fire pits?
o There is nothing directly pertaining to the Minnesota State Fire Code but the City of Centerville
code states not more than one fire at a time and fire pits must be a minimum of 25ft from any
structures.
Outdoor GrillStations
o Is there exact locations and dimensions for the outdoor grill stations?
o There isnothing directly pertaining to the Minnesota State Fire Code for these
o Will these be gas grills?
Any other additional concerns have been addressed previously during preliminary plan reviews and meetings with
all parties involved.
Sincerely,
Jake Pfeffer
Lieutenant 36 | Fire Inspector
CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT
Station 1: 2 East Road, Circle Pines, MN 55014
Station 3: 1880 Main Street, Centerville, MN 55038
p: (651) 792-7905m: (612) 352-8146
www.centennialfire.org
CITY OF CENTERVILLEREQUEST
FOR ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: RequestedMeetingDate:
June 4, 2024
Planning and Zoning
VII.1
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Use Review - Caliber Collision - 2010 Fairview Street
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
Please see the attached memo.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
N/A
REQUESTED ACTION:
Motion to finding that is "closely similar" to the Machine and
Repair Shops (indoor); a permitted use on the Table of Allowed Uses in City Code.
For ClerkÓs Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
Memo
Other (specify) ____________
______________________________________________________________
_____
_______________________________________________________________
Refer to: _________________________________
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Consent
Other: ___________________________________
Regular
Date: June 4, 2024
To: Honorable Chair and Commissioners
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
From: Athanasia Lewis, Assistant City Administrator
Subject: Permitted Use Evaluation Î Max Storage
In July of 2022, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for
Max Storage Enterprises, LLC, a limited liability company. Max Storage consists of two
buildings, each with eight (8) bays available for rent as storage units; other uses are available as
explained below. The bays each have a large overhead door and a person-door access. The
spaces are large enough to accommodate multiple vehicles, including dock-trucks or similar
equipment. The bays also contain a restroom, floor drain, heat, and a few other amenities.
Conditional Use Permit :
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS
The City of Centerville hereby grants the Subject Property and Landowner and a
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT to develop, construct, maintain, and operate a mini-storage,
subject to the following conditions:
1.Uses Permitted within the units on site are storage inside the building or any Permitted
Use in the I-1 zoning district.
3.If a use, other than mini-storage, is proposed for any unit that is allowed by Conditional
Use Permit (CUP) in the I-1 zoning district, the property owner will need to apply to the
City for a CUP on their behalf and get approval for the CUP before that user can occupy
the unit. If approved, any conditions attached to that use will run with the land and the
CUP that is recorded with the property.
4.The property owner will notify the City, in a manner defined by the City Administrator,
of any use, other than mini storage, in any of the units and a determination will be made
if the use is permitted or not. If permitted by CUP, as noted above, then the CUP process
must be followed before that user can occupy the unit.
The city is in receipt of a proposal for occupancy of a bay from the building owners. The Zoning
Administrator (City Administrator Mark Statz), has made the following determination on the
proposal as follows:
Proposal: Caliber Collision
The proposed business is for auto glass repair/replacement and calibration.
The building is located in the I-1 (Industrial) zoning district. The cityÓs Planning and Zoning
Commission recently found two different businesses who did window tinting, auto accessory
installation and retrofitting of vehicles for public safety uses to be to be substantially similar to
ÐMachine and Repair Shops,Ñ under the cityÓs zoning code.
StaffÓs recommendation is that this use is Ðclosely similarÑ to a Machine and Repair Shop, which
is a permitted use in the Industrial Zone. As with the other examples noted above, we viewed
them as separate and distinct from ÐAutomobile Service,Ñ which tends to involve issues like
noise, smells, greasy messy premises, and the risk of undesirable wastewater components (oil,
VOCs, etc.). This operation, like the others, would be clean, quiet and pose very little risk to the
sewer system.
If the Planning Commission concurs that auto glass repair/replacement and calibration is also
substantially similar to Machine and Repair Shops,by the Planning
Commission
TABLE 156-A.1 District Allowed Uses
Revised Ord. 1 Version /2/202
-
l
a
e
c
n
n
68716001020o
1
1
i
e
11121233455t
*
5
A
i
2
r
12345121*
1
00000000000
10
-
-
--2------
...........
.de
-
-
If
66666666666
6P
RRRRRBBd
MM
e
R
55555555555
5
A
Use Category and Use Type
11111111111R
1
Agricultural Uses
Crop production and vegetable gardeningP
Produce stands for products raised on the
P
premises
Tree nurseries and sod farmsP
Horses, livestock and fowl, not exceeding a
density of one horse or livestock animal per P
acre or three fowl per acre
Group Living Uses
Nursing homesC
Residential-Care for six or Fewer Persons
PPPPPPPUDPUD
(Except Juvenile Sex Offender Treatment)
Residential-Care for Juvenile Sex Offender
Treatment for six or fewer persons.(Subject to
conditions as are necessary to protect the C
health and safety of the residents of the
residential facility per 156.021(C)(3).)
156.021(C3)
Residential-Care for seven through sixteen
Persons (Except Care for Juvenile Sex C
Offender Treatment)
Family Day Care serving twelve or fewer
PPPPPPPUDPUD
persons
Group Family Day Care serving 14 or fewer
PPPPPPPUDPUD
persons
Licensed day care serving thirteen through
C
sixteen persons
Licensed day care serving seventeen or more
CPUDPUD
persons
Specialized Care FacilityCPUDPUD
Household Living Uses
Single-family detached dwellings at a density
P
not exceeding one home per ten acres
Single-family detached dwellingsPPPP
Single-family attached dwellings with up to two
P
dwelling units per building
Single-family attached dwellings with up to
C
twelve dwelling units per acre
Single-family attached or detached dwellings
where in combination with multi-family dwellings
PUD
PUD
PUD
on the development property meet the district
density goal
Manufactured housing development, park, or
PUD
cooperative 156.019
Multi-family projectsPUDPUDPUD
Public parks and recreation usesPPPPPPPP
Residential accessory uses as further reguated
PPPPPP
156.107
in this chapter
Home OccupationsPPPPPP
156.102
Commercial Uses
156.040 (H),
Accessory BuildingsPPPCC
156.107
Accessory storage within the principal buildingPPPPPPPPPPPP
156.107
Adult and Sexually oriented businesses as
C
further regulated in this code
110.01-110.99
Revised Ord. 1##, Version 10/20/2023
Use Category and Use Type
CC
Veterinary Clinic
90.01-90.09
CCC
Pet Shop
90.01-90.09
C
Kennel
90.01-90.09
Automobile and motorized equipment sales,
CC
excluding salvage operations (Outdoors)
Automobile and motorized equipment sales,
PP
excluding salvage operations (Indoors)
Automobile and motorized equipment service,
CC
excluding salvage operations as accessory to a
gas station
Automobile and motorized equipment service,
CC
excluding salvage operations
Barber/beauty salonsPPPUDPUD
Building Supply Sales and Storage YardsCC
Building Supply Sales and Storage Yards
C
(Winthin Building Only)
Business and Professional OfficesPPPPUDPUD
Car washesCP
Car wash, as Accessory to Retail Fuel SalesCC
PPPUDPUD
Commercial schools/Cultural CentersCCP
Commercial recreationCCCPUDPUD
Construction trade offices and yardsP
Crematorium
Day care - see Group Living UsesCCCCCCC
Day care facilityPPPUDPUD
Eating and drinking establishmentsPPPUDPUD
Farm/Lawn Implement sales and serviceC
Farm/Lawn Implement sales and service
PP
(Within Building Only)
Financial institutionsPPPUDPUD
Funeral homes and mortuaries (excluding
CC
Crematoriums)
HospitalsCCP
HotelsPPPUD
Liquor storesPPPUDPUD
Machine and repair shops-inside building onlyMachine and repair shops-inside building onlyCPCP
Non-Retail (Bulk) Fuel SalesC
Personal and professional business officesPPPPUDPUD
Public buildingsCCCCCCPPPPUDPUDP
Public utility buildings and structuresCCCCCCPPP
Retail Fuel SalesPP
Theatres and recreational businesses
PPPUD
conducted within structures.
Retail sales and service, excluding adult-
PPPUDPUD
oriented businesses
Revised Ord. 1##, Version 10/20/2023
-
l
a
e
c
n
n
68716001020o
1
1
i
e
11121233455t
*
5
A
i
2
r
12345121*
1
00000000000
10
-
-
--2------
...........
.de
-
-
If
66666666666
6P
RRRRRBBd
MM
e
R
55555555555
5
A
Use Category and Use Type
11111111111R
1
Outdoor retail sales and service, excluding
CCC
adult-oriented businesses
Industrial Uses
Indoor Shooting/Archery RangeP
Machine and repair shops (Indoors)CP
Manufacturing, processing, assembly except
C
recycling and waste
Mini-StorageCC
Research Facility, excluding animal or livestockP
Industrial Uses
Recycling and Waste Processing entirely within
C
the principle structure
Truck TerminalC
Warehouse/DistributionP
CODES
**1 These
Interim UseI
references are
Permitted UseP
for guidance
only and are not
Conditional UseC
intended to
Planned Unit DevelopmentPUD
include all
applicable
sections of the
code.
Reference:
Procedures for Site Plan Review
156.108
XXXXXXXXXXX
Procedures for Conditional Use Permits
156.320
XXXXXXXXXXX
Procedures for Planned Unit Developments
156.200
XXXXXXXXXXX
Procedures for Variances
156.310
XXXXXXXXXXX
156.167,
Landscape and Tree Planing Requirements
156.168
XXXXXXXXXXXX
Fences
XXXXXXXXXXXX
Building Height Limits
156.121
XXXXXXXXXXXX
Yards
156.122
XXXXXXXXXXXX
Appendix A,
Setbacks
Table 1
XXXXXXXXXXXX
Parking Requirements
156.166
XXXXXXXXXXXX
Other Standards
156.144
XXXXXXXXXXXX
Outside Storage
156.144, (M)
XXXXXXXXXXXX
Shoreland Requirements
156.133
XXXXXXXXXXX
CITY OF CENTERVILLEREQUEST
FOR ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: RequestedMeetingDate:
June 4, 2024
Planning and Zoning
VII.2
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Minimum Control Measure (MCM) - Ordinance
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
With the reiConstruction Stormwater (CSW) Permit is required
to update its Minimum Control Measure (MCM) 4 ordinances by July 31st; MS4 permittees are
required to update or revise their MCM regulatory mechanism to be at least as stringent as the CSW
requirements for erosion, sediment, and waste controls.
Staff recommends adopting the MCPA model ordinances for MCM4 and MCM5 and repealing Chapter 157:
Erosion Control (existing ordinance) in its entirety to comply with the MS4 general permit.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
N/A
REQUESTED ACTION:
Discussion.
For ClerkÓs Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
Ordinances (draft model, existing)
Other (specify) ____________
______________________________________________________________
_____
_______________________________________________________________
Refer to: _________________________________
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Consent
Other: ___________________________________
Regular
CITY OF CENTERVILLEREQUEST
FOR ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: RequestedMeetingDate:
June 4, 2024
Planning and Zoning
VIII.1
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Minutes - May 7,
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
The May 17, 2024 meeting minutes are in the packet for the Commission's review.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
N/A
REQUESTED ACTION:
Motion to approve the May 17, 2024 meeting minutes.
For ClerkÓs Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
Minutes
Other (specify) ____________
______________________________________________________________
_____
_______________________________________________________________
Refer to: _________________________________
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Consent
Other: ___________________________________
Regular
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning
Commission was held in the community center at St. GeneviveÓs Church on Tuesday, May 7, 2024,
at 6:30 p.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Krueger called the regular meeting to order at 6:37p.m.
1. Roll Call
Present: Commissioner Richard Nelson
Not Approved
Commissioner Dawn Kalina
Vice-Chair Darrell (DJ) Olson, Jr.
Chair Jon Krueger
Commissioner Matthew McCabe
Commissioner Jeannie Seppala
Commissioner Bruce Thompson
Absent: None
Staff: City Administrator, Mark Statz
Assistant City Administrator, Athanasia Lewis
Consulting Planner, Phil Carlson
Council Council Member Russ Koski
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The agenda was approved as presented.
Motion by Commissioner Thompson seconded by Commissioner McCabe to Approve the
Agenda. All in favor. Motion carried.
IV. PUBLIC HEARING (6:30 PM or shortly thereafter)
1. Drilling Estates
a. Preliminary Plat
Administrator Statz introduced the item as presented in the packet, noting that the property is
currently unplatted land described by metes and bounds. The owner would like to move the common
lot line parcels to distribute shoreline footage and improve the salability of both parcels more evenly.
Staff recommends the approval of the Preliminary Plat for Drilling Estates, with the following
findings of fact:
1. Platting the property is mutually beneficial for the applicant and the city.
2. CentervilleÓs approval of this plat is contingent upon approval from the City of Lino Lakes
Page 1 of 17
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 7, 2024
for the same.
3. The proposed plat meets the requirement of the City of CentervilleÓs subdivision ordinance.
Linda Drilling addressed the Planning and Zoning Commission and reviewed their request for the
lot line adjustment, thanking the Commission for their consideration.
The public hearing was opened at 6:49p.m.
Motion by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Commissioner Kalina to open the public
hearing at 6:49p.m. All in favor. Motion carried.
Public Comments
Pat Camp Baron at 7121 Centerville Road asked what the difference is between unplatted land and
numbered land. Administrator Statz explained that platted land means you are part of a plat that is
recorded at the county, and it is a simpler way to describe land; he further explained that it takes the
metes and bounds description and assigns a lot and block to it.
Motion by Commissioner Olson, seconded by Commissioner Nelson to close the public hearing
at 6:51p.m. All in favor. Motion carried.
2. LaLonde First Addition
a. Preliminary Plat
b. Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development
Administrator Statz introduced this item as presented in the packet, noting that the proposal is for a
104-market rate apartment building in the M2 Mixed-Use downtown district. Administrator Statz
noted that the Planning and Zoning Commission will need to evaluate whether the developerÓs
application meets the city code, including its reference to the Downtown Master Plan, and the CityÓs
Comprehensive Plan. Administrator Statz also noted the Commission will need to evaluate the
conditions they would like placed on the proposal, should it be approved.
City Planner Phil Carlson reviewed the proposed development, highlighting key features of the
building, parking, density, architecture, landscaping, traffic, etc. Mr. Carlson also noted that the
proposed project meets the council-adopted downtown master plan for Centerville.
City Attorney Kurt Glasser noted that a planned unit development is a flexible tool that allows the
city to relax certain conditions for the development. The conditional use permit (CUP) also allows
the city to put conditions on the property. The conditional use permit is a recordable document that
stays with the property forever; the conditional use permit allows the city to have control over the
conditions placed on the property. A conditional use permit is enforceable and there are civil
penalties tied to violating the conditional use permit. Attorney Glasser noted that the Planning and
Zoning Commission could add or amend conditions prior to approving the conditional use permit.
Matt Pacyna with Transportation Collaborative and Consultants provided an overview of the results
of the traffic study he conducted for the proposed development. The goal of the study was to quantify
existing traffic conditions from a traffic operations perspective. The study involved counting and
collecting traffic volumes, looking at roadway characteristics, evaluating crash history, intersection
capacity, developing forecasts (using a few different methods), looking at industry standards and
determining if mitigation measures are needed. New traffic counts were collected in April between
Page 2 of 17
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 7, 2024
8:30am-9:30am and between 3:30pm-4:30p.m. Mr. Pacyna discussed the level of service, noting
traffic during peak times, the traffic forecast, and the number of trips that the development would
likely add in phase one and phase two of the project (should the property to the south develop). Mr.
Pacyna noted that the first phase of development would generate 750 daily trips and the second
phase would generate about 1250 trips per day; he noted that westbound traffic queues would
increase during peak hours for about a 15-minute period.
Mr. Pacyna also discussed mitigation options within the next 3-5 years, which could include a
roundabout, mini roundabout, or signal reconfiguration.
Questions from the Commission on the Traffic Study
Commissioner Seppala asked what a mini roundabout would do to the cityÓs master plan, how much
land it would require, and if KellyÓs Korner would go away.
Mr. Pacyna explained that a mini roundabout is a little larger than a cul-de-sac and that it would
likely be pushed north to avoid business impacts on the south side. Mr. Pacyna added that further
discussions would occur with the county about mitigation options. Administrator Statz added that
he shared the traffic study with the County, and they thought even a regular roundabout could fit in
the space.
Commissioner McCabe asked about safety with pedestrians crossing in a roundabout. Mr. Pacyna
explained that signals are more straightforward, but roundabouts and signals both provide for safe
pedestrian crossings. There are abilities to further enhance crossings like (regular rapid flashing
beacon (RFP). Administrator Statz added that safety is very important and in talking with the school
the number of kids walking from the south is minimal; the school is only aware of 15 students
walking. Commissioner Kalina said she noticed there were a lot of people walking across the path
that goes behind the property, so they were crossing a four-way street; adding that there were
students and families with strollers walking the trail. Administrator Statz clarified that the
information he received is that there arenÓt students whose main mode of transportation to school
are walking from the south. Administrator Statz also added that staff would work with the county
on drawings in the near future.
Presentation from The Developer
Marcus Ebert with Ebert Companies thanked the Commission and staff for presenting their project.
He said that Ebert Companies is a local developer, and they like to build high end market rate
projects. Mr. Ebert added that they are long-term holders who hold their properties for a long time,
not just a couple of years. They work with a family operator locally, who has a similar vision, with
the same mindset. Mr. Ebert said they want to be a part of the Centerville community; he added that
they appreciated the opportunity to attend an open house where they could share their story with
residents and get to know the people in Centerville Î he said they love Centerville for the same
reason everyone else does Î itÓs a great community, with great people, great tradition, and they are
excited to be part of a project and the community.
Questions from the Commission to the Developer
Commissioners Seppala and Kalina asked the developer how a 104-unit apartment building will
keep the small-town feel. Mr. Ebert said that they are trying to track residents that are moving to
Centerville to promote this, realizing it will not be the same as a single-family home. Mr. Ebert
added they will do their best to maintain the small-town feel.
Page 3 of 17
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 7, 2024
Commissioner Nelson asked Mr. Ebert if they would work with the elementary school during
construction to ensure the safety of the kids. Mr. Ebert said that safety is important to them and that
they would work with the schools to ensure the safety of the kids.
Commissioner Kalina reported that she received letters from residents who expressed concern about
the size of the development, noting the height and high density Î she asked if the apartment could
be amended to be a medium density development. Mr. Ebert stated that it would be difficult to make
a smaller project work financially. Commissioner Kalina asked follow-up questions about height of
the development, (what can be done to reduce the elevation from the west and north to keep it to a
three-level maximum height).
Mr. Brady from Momentum Design Group and his associate Jesse explained that the site slopes
tremendously from the back of the site or the school area, down to the water and that theyÓve tried
to balance how to put vehicles under the building and enclosed it so people do not see the parking.
Commissioner Kalina asked about the lack of green space or buffer between the 56-stall surface
parking lot between the building and Centerville Elementary; she asked what could be done to create
green space or a buffer to the elementary school. Mr. Brady advised that it would be in their best
interest to preserve the trees. Commissioner Seppala noted that the plans do not show the trees. Mr.
Brady noted that they would plant new trees. Commissioner Seppala asked if they would all be
deciduous.
Commissioner Seppala asked staff about the highest point of the building, referencing the mile high
in all directions reference in Mr. CarlsonÓs planning memo (page 5). She asked about the cinder wall
facing the lake and how high it is above Centerville Lake. Mr. Brady said theyÓd have to get back
to the Commission with the calculations. Commissioner Kalina asked what the impact will have on
the existing family homes to the north of the building. Mr. Brady said the trees would be planted
along the north edge of the building to the property line. Commissioner Kalina asked how the project
could be amended to lessen the impact of an exposed façade of the parking level that rises four
stories. Mr. Brady showed the plantings facing the lake, noting that theyÓve used vines to grow up
the façade in other projects; they have also incorporated fenestration or windows into the parking
areas too Î they havenÓt shown that here yet.
Commissioner Kalina asked about parking spaces, stating that she feels it is inadequate. Mr. Ebert
reviewed their parking plan for the project.
Commissioner Kalina asked about the entrance from Westview into the lot and extending Westview.
Administrator Statz noted that the plan has been revised. Originally, there was a parking lot on the
west side of the building. Due to aesthetics and providing a safe fire access on the north side of the
building, the design changed and has the entrance on the north side of the building. The building
was moved south to accommodate a fire lane on the north and west parking lot was eliminated.
Commissioner Kalina asked if they have other apartment complexes with only one entrance to the
property. Mr. Ebert said they ran this by the Fire Marshall, and they were okay with the design.
They would love to have another access point, but the site does not accommodate one.
Page 4 of 17
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 7, 2024
Commissioner Seppala asked if there is room for people with moving fans to get in and out of the
or if they have to have an empty spot. She asked about ambulances having to back out and fire
trucks, police cars. Mr. Ebert said the space is designed to be able to back up and out.
Commissioner Thompson asked if their finance model requires certain pre-lease agreements. Mr.
Ebert said no. Commissioner Thompson asked what happens if the rent goals are not being met. Mr.
Ebert said they would have to evaluate that as they go, noting that they are marketing a high-end
luxury product. They have reserves for about a year and a half and if they did not meet their goals,
they would have to make adjustments but hopefully thatÓs not the case.
Commissioner Nelson asked about their snow removal plan and where it will be stored. Mr. Ebert
reported that they do not have a plan to date but will have one.
Commissioner Olson asked if there was a landscape plan, because per the site plan it appears
everything is being removed. Mr. Ebert said that they have worked with the city and are meeting
the city code. They are trying to leave as many mature trees as they can. Commissioner Olson stated
that he doubts the trees are a caliper inch equivalent. Administrator Statz stated that there is no code
requirement to replace caliper inch requirement in kind.
Mr. Olson asked who made the decision to deviate from the downtown master plan for design intent.
Mr. Brady said the oldest example of French-Canadian example architecture they could find was
the old school and they used this as a guiding principle. Commissioner Seppala added that it looks
like something in Lexington, adding that you have to look hard to see the French features.
Commissioner Olson added that the design looks too broken up.
Presentation from Landowner
Mrs. Chadima addressed the Planning and Zoning Commission and discussed what the property has
meant to her and her family over the years and their desire to share the property with others.
Public Meeting Opened
Chair Krueger opened the public hearing on the LaLonde Proposal at 7:51p.m.
Public Comments:
1. Wendy Brilowski, 7124 Main Street (1:51:50 to 2:04:21) on recording.
Ms. Brilowski stated that of all the properties, she believes that she is the most directly impacted by
the proposed development. Ms. Brilowski said that she has some concerns that she would like to
share. Ms. Brilowski said she has been feeling harassed by community members by some
information that has been out there. She said that she respects her city council and representatives
and believes that they will do their due diligence. Ms. Brilowski added that she is not happy with
the number of community members who have approached her privately on the assumption that she
must be against development of the LaLonde property. Ms. Brilowski started that she is dismayed
by the lack of research, and inaccurate information that neighbors have shared with her and that she
has the ability to form her own opinion.
Ms. Brilowski stated that she is greatly irritated by the pressure to confirm to the ideas of those who
will be less impacted than she is by the development. Ms. Brilowski said that when she explained
some inaccuracies of the petition circulating, she was told that it was too late to make any changes
and that it wasnÓt very important anyway. Ms. Brilowski also said that it has come to her attention
that when she mentioned to a community member who had come to her door that being in a Tax
Page 5 of 17
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 7, 2024
Increment Financing (TIF) could potentially be beneficial for her property, her comment was taken
to mean that she refused to sign the petition because she was holding out to sell to a developer. Ms.
Brilowski clarified that she plans to be in her home for another twenty years.
Ms. Brilowski stated that the administrators of the Face Book page continue to allow inflammatory
comments to be posted. Ms. Brilowski stated that our officials serve our community with integrity
and asked what gives people the right to accuse them of acting illegally by accepting kickbacks. Ms.
Brilowski said that the Change.org petition is circulating from Coon Rapids to Hudson, Wisconsin
and has 200 signatures from 3 different zip codes. Ms. Brilowski stated that the only zips code the
Commission should listen to is the one in Centerville. She added that the city, landowner, developer
have worked with her and followed up every month. Ms. Brilowski stated that there is no lack of
information, and that the city has been notifying the public since August 2023 Î the city has done
its due diligence.
Ms. Brilowski Stated that the property in question is not going to be sold as a single-family home
because the property is structurally deficient. She started that she thinks it would be better to have
live next to luxury apartments than it would be 30 town homes like people think they want, because
the traffic study shows what and when you can expect heavier traffic. Ms. Brilowski added that with
town homes marketed to young families there is less certainty about when people are coming and
going.
Ms. Brilowski stated that the luxury apartments in North Oaks have a minimum requirement of
$1,000,000 for an apartment, so she thinks the apartments in Centerville will be occupied. Ms.
Brilowski stated that she is disgusted about comments about people who might move in if all units
are not filled as luxury apartments. Ms. Brilowski added: does not everyone deserve equitable
housing?
Ms. Brilowski said that she has concerns about trips with traffic but understands that traffic will
continue to increase with development around Centerville. She stated that she is a retired
schoolteacher and became a bus driver for Rehbein for the Centerville Elementary School route.
Ms. Brilowski said that morning traffic is ok and there are not problems. She added that in the
afternoon, traffic is horrendous, and it is on the part of the parents who are not obeying logical
sequence of traffic because they are cutting in front of the school buses and that has nothing to do
with the developer.
Ms. Brilowski stated that kids are not allowed to cross Main Street, noting that children are escorted
out by grade, by teacher and are escorted to parentsÓ cars and the school bus as well as off the bus.
She added that the 10-foot buffer zone and walkway are totally safe.
Ms. Brilowski said that she recently learned that there is no longer a restriction for a restaurant near
the elementary school to hold a liquor license and it would be her worst personal nightmare with not
knowing when people are coming and going and at all hours of the night. Ms. Brilowski stated that
the apartments seem like a better fit for everyone.
Ms. Brilowski stated that she would hate to see the LaLonde property not generate taxes like Block
7. She also said that she grew up in Stillwater, and sees what a lovely, vibrant community it is and
that she would like to see this in Centerville. Ms. Brilowski stated that what the developer is
proposing is within the M2 Zoning District.
Page 6 of 17
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 7, 2024
2. Annie Weigers, 1683 Lakeland Circle (2:04:31 to 2:06:00)
Ms. Weigers stated that she has young kids who attend Centerville Elementary School, and they are
walkers. She added that there are about 10 walkers who do leave school unaccompanied and that is
of high concern to her. Ms. Wiegers stated that it is scary to have this big building. Ms. Weigers
stated that she moved to Centerville because of the small community feeling Î that when she pulls
up to gas station in winter and sees snow mobiles, she likes this, and the proposed development is
going to change the whole neighborhood. Ms. Weigers stated that her concern is mainly for kids Î
she has a lot of hesitation because of safety for the kids.
3. Nancy Golden, 1654 Lakeland Circle (2:06:05 to 2.08:54)
Ms. Golden stated that she has been the LalondeÓs neighbor for 26 years. She stated that she knows
itÓs going to change, however she does not think the community wants a 104-unit apartment
building. Ms. Golden stated that she read the developers report and on page 4 there are several goals
for being part of this community with the #1 goal being to promote a small-town atmosphere Î Ms.
Golden stated that she does not know how this could happen with a 104 unit apartment building,
adding that the aesthetics of building will forever change Centerville with the massive structure
towering over homes and the lake.
Ms. Golden said that she does not want to see Centerville have a vibrant bustling downtown
atmosphere like white bear lake, Delano, or Stillwater and itÓs because Centerville has an elementary
school in the middle of downtown and that this is what sets us apart. Ms. Golden asked the
Commission (due to the size and scope of the apartment complex) to vote no and to consider
developing the property into something else Î something that the community wants.
4. Gary Reimers, 1658 Lakeland Circle (2:09:09 to 2:11:24)
Mr. Reimers said he bought his house in 2000 and chose Centerville, because itÓs a nice quiet
bedroom community, without a lot of traffic, without a lot of businesses, and without a lot of
busyness. Mr. Reimers said that he likes it this way and if he wanted hustle and bustle, he would
have built in Woodbury where he worked. He said he would tell people that he felt calmer on his
drive home and that when he got home, he could sit outside and talk to neighbors without listening
to traffic, or construction, or the noise of a multi-story high density apartment complex up the street.
Mr. Reimers said that he doubts that the number of people who want an increase in population for
state aid is small and that the number of fellow Centerville citizens that care about rooftop counts
to attract retail development is also small. Mr. Reimers said that he thinks there are many people in
the room tonight who want the community to stay small like it is Î that residents to not care about
retail Î that residents are perfectly happy going to Lino Lakes or Hugo for McDonalds, Starbucks,
or kohls.
Mr. Reimers also stated that he has a hard time believing the added traffic will not be impactful. He
also stated that the priority will be to fill the market rate apartment building and if it doesnÓt rent
then something will change. He questions on page 19 of the packet where comments are broken
th
down by resident, because he does not see the March 20 email that he sent to Administrator Statz
or the one where Administrator Statz responded. Gary asked the Commission to vote no.
5. Roy Krull, 1618 Peltier Drive (2:11:51 to 2.17:30)
Page 7 of 17
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 7, 2024
Roy asked who developed the density figures. Administrator Statz noted that the density
requirements are part of what was developed in 2006 with the Master Plan, and then further
numerated, the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, and again reaffirmed in 2018 City Comprehensive Plan.
Administrator Statz noted that there have been two Comprehensive Plans since then and the density
is between 12-45 units per acre Î the proposal for 104 units is 36 units per acre. Mr. Krull asked
what ramifications there are if the city does not meet these. Administrator Statz stated that if the
development does not meet the densities, the development would not meet the parameters in the
zoning code and the development should be denied. Mr. Krull asked if there are any financial
ramifications from an outside agency because the city decided to turn this down. Administrator Statz
noted that there are no zoning police, but the one danger is that the landowner or developer could
seek litigation for improper denial. Mr. Krull asked if there was any pressure on the city to allow
this development. Attorney Glasser noted that there is no outside influence or financial benefit for
the city. Planner Carlson added that the Master Plan that is in place for downtown was developed
by the community and added to the Comprehensive Plan in 2008 and again in 2018. Planner Carlson
added that the Master Plan is a product of the community and what they said they want. Mr. Krull
also said that he likes to walk, and he has a difficult time crossing from Peltier Lake to Main via car,
let alone walking. Mr. Krull stated that he believes this is an ADA issue and an age issue; he added
that he is being denied the use of our beautiful parks and walkways. Mr. Krull said he would follow
up with the Department of Transportation.
6. Jon Krueger, 7248 Centerville Road (2:18:08 to 2:22:51)
Mr. Krueger stated that he has spent his career in Life-Safety, and he asked if there are adequate
resources to handle an emergency in the structure being proposed. Administrator Statz stated that
with the design process, one of the major things the city spoke with the developer about is emergency
access and Centennial Fire District confirmed that they are capable of reaching the heights of this
building with their fire apparatus and that the building is sprinkled. The Fire District looked at layout
of the site and worked with the developer to ensure solid access points around the building as well
as the creation of a fire lane close to the northwest corner of the site. The fire department is now
satisfied with their access points around the building and their ability to fight a fire in this structure.
Mr. Krueger asked if vehicles would be cutting through the school parking lot at times where there
is congestion on MainStreet and Centerville Toad and Administrator Statz stated that we could work
with the school to mitigate or eliminate this all together.
7. Mark Brilowski, 7124 Main Street (2:23:02 to 2:24:28)
Mr. Brilowski said that he has heard people saying that they are perfectly happy to take their business
to Lino Lakes or Blaine for services, but he thinks it would be best if we could keep most of
Centerville money in Centerville, adding that it would help with our revenue and our local
businesses. Mr. Brilowski said we donÓt have enough people living in the city to attract good
business and that we have to give people places to live. Mr. Brilowski also said that Lino Lakes and
Blaine are building like crazy and thatÓs where people are going to live and thatÓs where the traffic
is coming from Î not from this development. Mr. Brilowski stated if everyone is upset about putting
this place in and where itÓs going, then in 2006 when the council put in the M2 district, that was
their time to complain.
8.Hatem Qamhieh, 7251 Clearwater Drive (2:24:42 to 2:30:03)
Mr. Qamhieh stated that the development would create a lot of traffic, this is a big concern for him.
He said the traffic has never been addressed property and a roundabout would be the better option
but to check to ensure proper fit and land acquisition before the building anything Mr. Qamhieh also
Page 8 of 17
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 7, 2024
stated that traffic added from the development around us has also not been addressed. Mr. Qamhieh
asked if the city has investigated Safe Routes to School Funding. Administrator Statz stated that the
one thing that might hinder our ability to get a Safe Routes to School grant is that we do not have
students crossing Main Street. Mr. Qamhieh said that he met with the school principal about sight
issues, traffic lights, etc. Mr. Qamhieh also stated that parking has never been addressed and that
privacy is an issue for people on the third floor. Mr. Qamhieh added that we need shops to attract
people and that we could reduce the residential units and have some shops.
9. Matt Froebel, 7180 Clear Ridge (2:30:36 to 2:33:32)
Mr. Froebel stated that the church is the focal point, with the addition of a large apartment complex
it will take away from the aesthetic standpoint. Mr. Froebel added that if anything from the house
can be salvaged or repurposed, he would like to see this, as he would hate to see the home just
leveled.
10. Tyler Brigl, 1295 Mound Trail (2:33:56 to 2:38:00)
Mr. Brigl said that when he tells his friends he lives in Centerville they do not know where it is and
thatÓs what a small town is and thatÓs what a small-town feel is. He stated that small towns do not
have 104-unit apartment buildings. Mr. Brigl asked the Commission to look at the situation and the
morality of it because community matters and the community does not want this. Mr. Brigl also
stated that things should be built on merit, so if the development goes through with this then to make
them build it on their own, without financial assistance because it is not right or fair for the
community.
11. Anita Rios, 1680 Lakeland Circle (2:38:14 to 2:42:36)
Ms. Rios stated that she moved to the community 17 years ago and they were drawn to the lakes,
trails, and the 2006 master plan clinched the deal. She said they saw this idealic community with a
bakery, wine bar, and brew pub with residents upstairs. Ms. Rios said that she understands that due
to market conditions the plan didnÓt pan out. Ms. Rios also stated that she understands that market
conditions have changed and that the LaLonde property was rezoned in 2011. She doesnÓt remember
getting public notice of the rezoning and talked with neighbors who also do not remember getting a
public notice. Ms. Rios added that even though the property is rezoned to mixed use, she feels
strongly that the LaLonde proposal does not fit with the overarching vision communicated in the
vision of 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which states that goal of Centerville is to use the Ðmixed-used
designation to create well designed pedestrian oriented development that enhances the quality of
life for city residents and promotes a traditional neighborhood or small town atmosphere.Ñ Ms. Rios
said that she does not understand how a 104-unit apartment building will accomplish this goal and
that the sheer size of 104-unit apartment building is too large for our small city; further, she said she
believes it will change its character and will be the first thing residents see from any direction. Ms.
Rios would like to present a petition, noting that she is the author of the change.org petition; the
petition asks the council to not approve TIF for the proposal and then to focus on less dense owner-
occupied housing that brings clear benefits to our city. Ms. Rios said that in less than 2 weeks there
are 407 signatures on the petition. Ms. Rios stated that members of the Planning Commission have
great power to impact the quality of life for residents both now and in the future. Ms. Rios said the
apartment building will not promote a small-town atmosphere nor will it enhance the quality of life
for residents, and she asked the Commission to please vote no to the LaLonde proposal.
12. Tim Gladder, 1269 Mound Trail (2:43:00 to 2:45:31)
Page 9 of 17
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 7, 2024
Mr. Gladder said that as he Listened to the presentations, and he did not hear a lot of good arguments
for the benefit of the city Î he stated that it seems to benefit the landowner and the developer, but
not the rest of the town. Mr. Gladder said that he personally does not like density or rental, and in
other communities where he has lived, things seem to go better where there is more ownership Î he
stated that he prefers more of an ownership model like condos or something. Mr. Gladder said that
his experience with other presentations of luxury apartments is that they start out that way and when
market conditions change then they are not luxury anymore under any conditions. Mr. Gladder
added that with an ownership model there is a better probability of them staying luxury. He also
doesnÓt think going to the max density is what residents had in mind.
13. Cara Johnson, 1862 Partridge Place (2:45:45 to 2:49:52)
Ms. Johnson stated that from what she has heard today, she would like to share a few observations.
Ms. Johnson said that the goal of today is to decide whether in part this project reflects the Master
Plan and that she has heard consistently through the presentationÓs contradictions, that it does not.
Ms. Johnson said that the developer avoided answering too many questions that need to be answered
before making such a momentous decision.
Ms. Johnson added that there is no way to guarantee that a 104-unit apartment building will keep
the small town feeling small.
Ms. Johnson stated that when she looks at the conditional use permit and reflects on there only being
one chance to do it right Î in her opinion we donÓt normally get it right on one time Î we usually
need a couple of passes.
Ms. Johnson asked parents to think about their children and/or grandchildren and hold them up
because the risk or lack of ability to guarantee the things needed for our children is too high.
Ms. Johnson said that she moved here three years ago to raise her children in a small town with a
great school where she knows her children are safe. Ms. Johnson added that she did not move here
to worry about a 100 plus unit apartment building and how it will impact her children. Ms. Johnson
added that in terms of public nuisance, smoking, vaping, loitering, balconies overlooking children
on the playground, access to the trail used for recess, have all been discussed.
Ms. Johnson stated that having 104 units with people that she does not know will have far too much
access to her children. Ms. Johnson added that children deserve our best, and that the heart of
Centerville should not be a 104Îunit apartment complex Î it should be the elementary school and
amazing kids that we have the privilege to know and to love.
Ms. Johnson requested that the Commission not approve the proposal; she asked the Commission
to consider options that are different, noting that we can continue to grow this beautiful town and
support our townsmen, and do it in a way that does not de-prioritize our children.
14. Pat Camp Baron, 7121 Centerville Road (2:5:00 to 2:53:02)
Ms. Camp Baron stated that she wanted to speak to her neighborÓs statement about the 2006 Master
Plan. Ms. Camp Baron said that she was at the master planning meetings to say please do not do
this. She said they talked about traffic studies and that traffic was not taken into consideration, aside
from the school. Ms. Camp Baron added that parents are not obeying speed limits and trying to get
Page 10 of 17
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 7, 2024
in front of the buses; she added that people are also parking in front of their house, and this has been
an issue for a long time. Ms. Camp Baron said that they have not been monitoring things as closely
as they should but are concerned about access to their property; she added that she has not heard
anybody talking about that.
Ms. Camp Baron stated that the reason they have not had any petitioners is because they have no
trespassing signs posted.
Ms. Camp Baron stated that she was not given notice when her property was rezoned in 2011 and
while it does not directly impact her, residents need to know so they can provide feedback.
Ms. Camp Baron asked the Commission to not consider approving the apartment complex.
17. Chad Wagner, 6781 Beaver Pond Way (2:53:11 to 2:55:54)
Mr. Wagner said that he would like to keep Centerville a bedroom community. Mr. Wagner asked
what the benefit is to the city?
What the response has been for public safety? Ms. Wagner said that he thinks the contractor is a
good, solid contractor, but what happens when they do not have all the leases signed and they cannot
guarantee they will be luxury.
18. Garland Port, 7013 LaMotte Drive (2:56:01 to 2:57:52)
Mr. Port said that he is very concerned about the plan to develop a large apartment in Centerville,
and that the government should put the interests of citizens first. Mr. Port added that the proposed
TIF subsidy will be at the expense of all current residents, and the immediate benefit will go to the
real estate developer, the landowner, the future apartment dwellers, and the city government. Mr.
Port stated that the promised future economic benefits may never materialize and will only benefit
a small fraction of Centerville residents.
Mr. Port said that when he went door to door to talk with neighbors, 95% were against this apartment
building; he added that people in Centerville do not want to degrade the quality of life in exchange
of theorical economic benefits.
Mr. Port asked the Commission to vote against the proposal even if it does meet the Master Plan.
19. Matt Beck, 1313 Mound Trail (2:57:49 to 2:58:21)
Mr. Beck said that he believes that it would be irresponsible to approve the plan presented with one-
way access to parking. Mr. Beck said that the Commission should require circulating access to
parking, adding that it would make it a much safer project and it would be a less dense project.
20. Heather Carciofini, 1652 Lakeland Circle (2:58:26 to 3:01:22)
Ms. Carciofini asked the Commission to please vote no. She said that although she understands that
this hearing is about a development plan for an area that is now zoned M2, she would like to be clear
that she has never supported the goals of the Downtown Master Plan, nor the rezoning that occurred
to support it.
Ms. Carciofini said that they chose Centerville because of its tranquil small-town feel, low density,
trails, lakes, parks, schools.
Page 11 of 17
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 7, 2024
Mr. Carciofini said that she does not support attempts to artificially stimulate commercial and retail
development by adding high density housing projects.
Ms. Carciofini said that she has specific concerns, which are that the complex is too big and too tall
for this location, adding that the building will loom over her property and span the entire length of
her backyard; she is concerned about light that will spill into her home and yard around her house.
Ms. Carciofini is also concerned about the potential for noise from external mechanicals, outside
party areas, and pet exercise areas.
Ms. Carciofini said that she fears the decline of property values, because who wants a massive
apartment complex in their backyard; she said that they understand change is inevitable, and she
knows the property will be developed at a density higher than what it currently is. Ms. Carciofini
said that this proposal is simply too big and tall, adding that she is supportive of a proposal with less
obtrusive housing and structures that do not rise more than 40 feet and/or dominate the landscape
and lake; she added that this would be more aesthetically pleasing.
Ms. Carciofini asked the Commission to vote no.
21. Katya Port, 7013 LaMotte Drive (3:01:33 to 3:02:51)
Ms. Port stated that high density will be an eyesore for the community of Centerville. She said that
she used to live in Fridley in an apartment building similar to the one in this plan, and there were
truck users, people not going to work, loud music, and it was dangerous to go outside after dark.
Ms. Port said that the tall building will lower the values of adjacent homes.
Ms. Port stated that she wants to live in Centerville wither her family because itÓs a small town.
Ms. Port stated that having a large apartment complex will change the fabric of the community and
the residents of Centerville will be forced to subsidize an economic development project that will
lower the quality of life for residents.
Ms. Port said that she went to collect signatures and 95% of people are against the project.
Ms. Port asked the Commission to please vote no.
22. Todd Lamier, 7239 Clear Ridge (3:03:06 to 3:06:54)
Mr. Lamier stated that there has been a history of executed projects that have not turned out so well:
streetlights, cobblestone colored pavement in front of school, noting that these are not major
projects. Mr. Lamier added that the LaLonde property is prime real estate, and that we should not
be using TIF.
Ms. Lamier said that he would rather see higher scale development with less density.
Mr. Lamier asked how the city will benefit, aside from receiving additional federal funds.
Page 12 of 17
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 7, 2024
Mr. Lamier said that rental properties bring fewer desirable elements, referencing Landings of
Lexington; Mr. Lamier said there is a high number of police calls, and the apartments are already
an issue for Lexington.
Mr. Lamier said that residents of Lino Lakes, Hugo, are all asking for a slowdown in development.
Mr. Lamier added that developments around us will impact on traffic.
Mr. Lamier stated that Centerville is a gateway, not a destination.
Mr. Lamier stated that we donÓt need rental housing.
Mr. Lamier stated that our long-term plan needs to change, adding that apartments stick out like a
sore thumb and will disrupt the small-town feel.
Mr. Lamier asked why we think adding rental properties will bring development when we have no
real attractions: 2 strip malls, 2 pizza places, 2 liquor stores.
Mr. Lamier stated that we need better redevelopment not new development. He added that we need
to reinvest in our city and come up with a better plan, so people want to stay in and be a part of our
city.
Mr. Lamier asked how schools are going to handle all new developments, noting that any child
harmed by lack of planning is one too many. Mr. Lamier asked how we look at fire and emergency
care as well as wear and tear on the roads.
Mr. Lamier added that any money we get from the increasing population will be spent on
infrastructure.
Mr. Lamier said that he does not think this has been thought through deep enough to address traffic
safety and future expenses, not to mention the concerns of the citizens if this passes.
Mr. Lamier asked the Commission to please deny the proposal.
23. Cheryl Sacco, 7267 Clearwater Drive (3:07:07 to 3:08:21)
Ms. Sacco said that she never approved of anything to put this complex over there and that if she
owned this beautiful property, she would want to sell it to somebody that had enough money to build
a beautiful house.
Ms. Sacco said that there are some beautiful houses along Mound trail. She said she is totally against
the proposal. Ms. Sacco said the LaLonde property is one of the most beautiful buildings when you
come into Centerville. She added that this is a conservation area, and she would like to keep it this
way.
24. Julie Driver, 1650 Lakeland Circle (3:08:30 to 3:10:53)
Ms. Driver stated that the Planning & Zoning Commission has heard many voices regarding the
development of the LaLonde proposal and that they are empowered to decide. Ms. Driver said that
her property borders the LaLonde property. Ms. Driver said that as a resident of Centerville, she is
asking the Commission to please vote no.
Page 13 of 17
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 7, 2024
Ms. Driver said that change is hard and that while we would prefer to see the LaLonde property
remain as is, much like people wanted what is now Lakeland Hills to be what it was, we understand
itÓs going to change; but we have an opportunity to influence change. Ms. Driver added that the
property is zoned M2 and will one day include medium to high density housing. She added that the
current proposal is too large for the property. Ms. Driver added that specifically, the northwest
corner of the proposed building is well over three stories tall and that not only will that loom over
her home and neighborsÓ homes, but it will also loom over Centerville, and it will be what people
will see when they are using our lake during all our Minnesota seasons.
Ms. Driver stated that the LaLonde property is a beautiful piece of land and asked the Commission
not to let so much of it to be taken away with such a large structure. She added that a smaller structure
could meet the density requirements and still fit in in Centerville.
25. Noel Berken-Whitney, 7224 Mill Road (3:10:52 to 3:12:45)
Ms. Berken-Whitney stated that her son had 35 kids in his class and that his teacher has taught there
for over 20 years. She added that when he told her how many kids were in his class, he almost had
tears in his eyes because he was not sure how he would get to know them individually and intimately
enough to do a good job of teaching them. Ms. Berken-Whitney added that the apartments would
add more students to a school that is already bursting, even with the recent addition.
Ms. Berken-Whitney stated that rental property is the number one call for service, and she does not
think we have the resources to handle that. She added that the officers are already spread thin across
several different towns.
Ms. Berken-Whitney said the Centennial police come from miles away when they have to respond
and itÓs not safe. She added that the proposal calls for fire trucks backing out and asked whose idea
that was.
Ms. Berken-Whitney thanked the Commission for asking tough questions of the developer, some
which were unanswered.
Ms. Berken-Whitney stated that Centerville is not known for thinking through big projects.
Ms. Berken-Whitney asked the commission to please consider voting no.
26. Linda Chaffee, 7211 LaValle Drive (3:12:53 to 3:14:05)
Ms. Chaffee said that she wanted to correct information about school walkers because in spring and
fall, she walks her granddaughter to school and last year there were 30 kids on bikes crossing Main
Street. She added that these kids are all considered bus riders because in the winter they ride the
bus, but when the weather is nice, they walk to school. Ms. Chaffee asked how kids are going to not
get hit while crossing with installation of a roundabout.
Ms. Chaffee said that she hopes no approval is made without all questions being answered.
27. Tom Wilharber, 6849 Centerville Road (3:14:15 to 3:15:16)
Page 14 of 17
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 7, 2024
Mr. Wilharber stated that sometimes people have to sell things because they cannot afford to keep
them. He said that he is not for or against the project, but that a person has a right to sell what they
have.
28. Gary Scherer, 2045 Willow (3:15:21 to 3:17:47)
Mr. Scherer said that he is not affected directly but feels for those who live where trees will be torn
down. He added that the trees are supposed to be a buffer and that tearing down all the mature trees
and then planting little ones will take 15 years or more to build up.
Mr. Scherer said that the market value can be one thing, but that people are not going to want to
come in and buy a house where you look at the third floor of an apartment building. He stated that
he is concerned that the apartment will depreciate the value of the homes in the area.
Mr. Scherer is also concerned about the TIF, stating that we are willing to give tax credits to
millionaires while residentsÓ taxes go up.
Mr. Scherer said that he is against this project, adding that it is a bad spot for an apartment building;
he stated that if given the opportunity, the property should be rezoned for low density and then
everyone comes out a winner.
29. Deanna Loomis, 7248 LaValle Drive (3:18:01 to 3:19:04)
Ms. Loomis stated that she does not think putting the apartment complex in is a good idea because
it will only add to traffic, make it more dangerous, and prompt the need for improvements quicker.
30. Hatem Qamhieh, 7251 Clearwater Drive (3:19:35 to 3:20:12)
Mr. Qamhieh, said that regarding the notion that there is state aid for getting to 5000 people, it is
not black and white and if you talk with them, they can work something out.
31. Bridget Lemire, 7239 Clear Ridge (3:20:24 to 3:22:31)
Ms. Lemire stated that the memories her kids and her friends have will last a lifetime and with
increased traffic, kids today will never be able to experience the same small-town feel. Ms. Lemire
asked Commissioners to vote no due to safety and financial concerns.
Ms. Lemire said that TIF should not be needed for lakefront property in a small community that has
been residentially owned for over one hundred years. Ms. Lemire asked why we canÓt pause and
revisit the cityÓs long-term plan to find more viable options to bring people in other than offering
this rental property TIF.
32. Nick Abernathy, 1305 Mound Trail (3:23:07 to 3:23:51)
Mr. Abernathy said that he is against this proposal; he also said he has direct relation to someone
who is in the apartment industry. He added that when you have this many units and when they are
having problems getting them rented then there have been times in Maple Grove where they have
done very short-term leases. Mr. Abernathy said he wanted to point out that there could be turnover
and a lot of people coming and going in a short period of time.
33. Ken Deakman, 1665 Lakleland Circle. (3:24:29 to 3:26:02)
Mr. Deakman said that he walks his dog every day and meets people all the time who are coming
here for the small-town feel; he added that he sees a lot of kids walking and it is very dangerous to
Page 15 of 17
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 7, 2024
cross at KellyÓs Korner Î this project will only make things more dangerous. Mr. Deakman stated
that this is not a walking friendly city, noting that he has to drive to LaMotte Park and that is pathetic.
The public hearing was closed.
Motion by Commissioner Kalina seconded by Commissioner Nelson to close the public
hearing at 7:08 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried.
V. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, APPEARANES
1. None
VI. OLD BUSINESS
1. None
VII. NEW BUSINESS
1. Drilling Estates
a. Preliminary Plat
The Commission approved the Preliminary Plat for Drilling Estates.
Motion by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Commissioner McCabe to approve the
Preliminary Plat for Drilling Estates. All in favor. Motion carried.
2. LaLonde First Addition
a. Preliminary Plat
b. Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development
Administrator Statz reviewed the possible motions for the Commission to consider.
Motion by Commissioner Thompson to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat and
Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development. There was no second. Motion
failed.
Motion by Commissioner McCabe, seconded by Commissioner Nelson to table the
Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development the LaLonde
property. All in favor. Motion carried.
VIII. APPROVAL OF MIN UTES
1. April 2, 2024, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
Administrator Statz introduced this item as presented in the packet.
Motion by Commissioner Olson, seconded by Commissioner Thompson to approve the April
2, 2024, Planning and Zoning Commission minutes. All in favor. Motion carried.
IX. ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES
1. Council Member Russ Koski
No Report
2. AdministratorÓs Report
No Report
X. ADJOURNMENT
Page 16 of 17
City of Centerville
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 7, 2024
Motion by Commissioner Olson, seconded by Commissioner Thompson to adjourn the
meeting at 11.01 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried.
Page 17 of 17
CITY OF CENTERVILLEREQUEST
FOR ACTION
Agenda Item # Department: RequestedMeetingDate:
June 4, 2024
Planning and Zoning
IX.2
TITLE OF ISSUE:
Administrator's Report
BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
The Administrator's Report is included in the packet for the Commission's review.
COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING:
N/A
REQUESTED ACTION:
Update only.
For ClerkÓs Use:
SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Motion By: ____________________________________
Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map
Second By: ____________________________________
Vote Record: Aye Nay
_____
Administrator's Report
Other (specify) ____________
______________________________________________________________
_____
_______________________________________________________________
Refer to: _________________________________
Tabled Until: ______________________________
Consent
Other: ___________________________________
Regular
AdministratorÓs Report
May 22, 2024
PARKS & RECREATION
Music in the Park
A sure sign that summer is here
is the first installment of our
Music in the Park series. The
Parks and Rec Committee thanks
Brian Peterson for his dedication
to the program and appreciates
his efforts in securing a wide-
variety of performers. Live
music will start at 6:30p.m.
Graphics generated by Lonni
Olson Design & Consulting Î
Thank you Lonni.
Fete des Lacs Logo Contest
The Committee has received the
contest entries, a subcommittee
will be meeting to determine the
winners shortly. Be prepared,
Mayor Love will be appearing at
the Elementary School and
Middle School to present the
st
winners with (2) $100 1 Place,
ndst
(2) $50 2 Place and (2) $25 Honorable Mentions prior to the end of the school year. The two 1 Place
logos will be utilized on the 5/8K Run T-Shirts and marketing associated with the festival. The winners will
also be announced through all social media associated with the City and on the Fete des Lacs website.
PUBLIC WORKS
WeÓre Hiring
Seasonal Public Works/Parks Maintenance Worker
This is a summer position assisting in general maintenance of city facilities (parks, streets, etc.). Requires
valid driverÓs license and good driving record, high school diploma or GED, experience with maintenance
quipment; ability to lift 25 lbs and occasionally up to 75 lbs. Must have personal transportation to work.
Hourly pay: $16.30/hr. Applications will be accepted until filled and preference will be given to individuals
that have been temporarily employed in this position previously.
Click here for an employment application packet
Adopt a Garden
Our Adopt-a-Garden program is off to a great start
again this year. Thanks to all the volunteers that
have stepped up to keep our parks and public
spaces looking great.
CENTERVILLE CARES
We will be recognizing our veterans, those currently
serving, and their families with a complimentary
th
breakfast at KellyÓs Korner on Saturday, May 25
from 9:00a.m.-11:00a.m. We are looking forward to
connecting with you!
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Quad Area Chamber Calendar
May 21, 2024 Î Downsizing with Ease: A
Roadmap for Seniors Looking to Transition to a
New Home Î 10:00am-11:00am Î the Rookery
Activity Center in Lino Lakes
May 22, 2024 Î Nosh & Networking Î Two
th
Silos Winery & Vineyard (7040 117 Street, Grant,
MN) Î Please register for this event ahead of time.
June 13, 2024 Î Quad Area Chamber Board Meeting Î 12:00pm-1:00pm - Online
June 20, 2024 Î Lunch & Learn Î Cyber Security Î 11:30am-1:00pm Î Lino Lakes Conference/Event
Center is in Renstrom Dental Studio.
rd
Quad Chamber 3 Annual Senior Expo
rd
Quad Chamber Senior Expo held their 3
th
annual Senior Expo on May 16 at the St.
Genevive Parish, and the event drew a crowd
of approximately 150 people. At the expo,
people had the opportunity to visit vendor
booths, participate in health screenings, drop
off prescriptions & sharps, win prizes, have
fun and network.
Thank you to the vendors, those who
attended, and event organizers for a
successful event.
ADMINISTRATION
Meeting and City Hall Schedule
May 22, 2024, 6:30 p.m. Î Work Session, 5:30 p.m., City Council Meeting, 6:30 p.m.
June 4, 2024, 6:30 p.m. Planning & Zoning Commission, (LaLonde First Addition)
June 5, 2024, 6:30 p.m. Î Parks & Recreation Committee
June 19, 2024, 5:30 p.m. Î Economic Development Authority
ENGINEERING
TH
20 Avenue (CSAH 54) Corridor Study
The study findings were presented to the City Council at their last meeting. A final version of the study
document will be in front of the council for final approval at this meeting.
Public Works (ContÓd)
Water Tower
Consulting engineers, KLM, have finished their work in performing some tests on the towerÓs paint to help
understand the scope and timing of a repaint. Staff will be discussing the results of that report with the
City Council at an upcoming workshop.
Public Works Truck Replacements
Our long-awaited public works truck (1-Ton) is nearing completion. We anticipate taking delivery next
week. After that, we will be sending it out to be outfitted with the dump box and plow assemblies.
New Employee
Centerville welcomes our newest employee: Alex Barmettler. Alex started last week and has hit the ground
running. His previous experience has led him to be a quick learner and we anticpate that he will be ready to
handle on-call duties within a few months.
Centerville Lake Alum Treatment
The Centerville Lake Alum Treatment project is underway. Results should be almost immediate and will become
more obvious as the temperatures warm. LetÓs all hope for a summer free of beach shut-downs and green slime!
ThereÓs lots of info at the projectÓs website: https://www.ricecreek.org/project/centerville-lake-alum-treatment/
CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPARTMENT
Staffing
The department has made two recent hires and has now filled all open positions. We are finding that quality
candidates are looking for work in communities like ours. We are also welcoming back a part-time officer
who has been out with a medical issue and has finally been cleared to work again. All in all, the department
is miles ahead of where we were in terms of staffing during the pandemic. Thank you to all of our citizens
that support our department.
CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT
WeÓre Hiring
WeÓre hiring! Click here for more info, or to apply: https://www.centennialfire.org/services-2.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
1687 Westview Street (LaLonde Property)
A public hearing was held on May 7 in front of the Planning Commission. The hearing was well attended
and over 30 people shared their thoughts. The Planning Commission did not take action on the proposed
Preliminary Plat and PUD, but plans to consider action at their next meeting, which will be June 4 at 6:30
PM at City Hall. The public hearing for the project was closed at the conclusion of the May 7 meeting, so
no further public comment will be taken by the June 4 meeting. However, the meeting is open to the public.
Peltier Estates
Sharper Homes has submitted an application for a Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development for the
th
19 acres in the northeast portion of the city along 20 Avenue, just north of Deer Pass. The development
th
proposal features 24, detached townhomes served by a cul-de-sac off of 20 Avenue. A trail connection to
the sidewalk on the west side of Brian Drive will be made from the end of the cul-de-sac. A public hearing
nd
on the development was held on April 2, at the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. The proposal is
substantially the same as what was proposed in 2017 and again in 2021. The Planning Commission
unanimously recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit
Development.
The City Council will consider the Preliminary Plat and CUP/PUD for approval at an upcoming meeting.
stnd
Old Mill Estates 1 and 2 Additions
The developer has had surveyors working on site to complete necessary documentation for close-out of the
developmentÓs Rice Creek Watershed District Permit, which is the main remaining item to be addressed
before we can look at closing out the development escrow.
The city continues to work with the developer and builders on site clean-up items.
rd
Old Mill Estates 3 Addition
rd
The developer of Old Mill Estates is proposing a 3 Addition concept that went before the Planning &
th
Zoning Commission for a ÐConcept ReviewÑ at their March 4, meeting. This subdivision was always a
stnd
part of the discussion when Old Mill Estates (1 and 2 Additions) was platted. However, the developer
needed more time to work out wetland and power line easement issues. With some of those issues more in
hand, the proposed subdivision would break up Lot 8, Block 2, into 4 lots (3 new lots). We anticipate a
formal application for Preliminary Plat, leading to a public hearing in May.
Block 7 Property (Downtown)
A developer recently met with city staff to review a concept plan involving 20 Î 26 row-style townhomes.
No official application has been received.
1737 Main Street (Block 3)
No recent activity.
Max Storage
The developer is reviewing plans for Phase II of the development; a second building of the same size. The
next building may contain fewer, larger units. Staff and the developer are working through the potential
changes to the project plans.
Rehbein Commercial
Developer securities have been received by the city for 35% of the initial project costs and will be held
through the 2-year warranty period, which will end in 2024.
Kwik Trip
The city council approved a reduction in the developmentÓs security, with the final escrow release coming
at the end of the 2-year warranty period (Dec. Ó24)
Rehbein Industrial
Developer securities have been received by the city for 35% of the initial project costs and will be held
through the 2-year warranty period, which will end in 2024.
Bay View Villas (Waterworks Site)
Application for a wetland permit close-out has now been received by the watershed and is in process for
approval. The city continues to be copied on correspondence between the developer and the wetland
regulatory agencies; progress is being made towards a resolution on the wetland permit. Several minor punch
list items remain.
Drilling Estates
Consideration of the Preliminary and Final Plats will be on the agenda for this City Council meeting.
Development Inquiries
None
HISTORY
History Niche
Come and take a look at our new display at City Hall featuring an interactive display, curated by the
Anoka County Historical Society. It features lots of fun facts about the early European settlers of the area
and is done in conjunction with the Cemetery Tours. You can find out more information about tours and
how to get tickets at the ACHS website:
https://anokacountyhistory.app.neoncrm.com/nx/portal/neonevents/events#/events/3885
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT April 2024)
Website (April)
1.8k users
1.7k new
5.4k page views
Web Site (Featured News)
MS4/SWPPP Input Session
Centerville Lake Alum Treatment
New P & R Member Katya Port
New P & Z Members Matthew McCabe & Jeannie Seppala
Stories for Cemetery Tour
Garage Sale Days
Share your Feedback Î LaLonde Development
Follow us on Social Media
Reader Board (11,000+ cars/day)
Meeting Schedules
Hiring Seasonal Public Works
Hydrant Flushing
Quad Area Chamber of Commerce Senior Expo.
Veterans Breakfast Î KellyÓs Korner
Social Media (568 Twitter; 804 FB Followers) (815/1752 Total Impressions)
City Accounts
o 4/30 P&R Packet (83/264)
o 4/22 Cougars End of Season Video (139/NA)
o 4/22 Centerville Cares Î Prescription Assistance (89/363)
o 4/19 CC Packet (124/326)
o 4/11 Severe Weather Week (117/205)
o 4/8 Senior and Low Income Property Tax Assistance (153/181)
o 4/5 CC Packet (110/413)
Community Email List (260 email addresses)
Upcoming Meeting Agendas, Admin. Report & Garbage/Recycle Delay
Business Email List (60 email addresses)
5/09/24 Promotional Opportunity Via Swag
Google Business Profile
140 profile views
140 Interactions
22 calls directly from site
52 asked for directions.
22 website visits from profile
Informational Kiosk Î Cornerstone Park
Summer Programming
MITP Flyer