The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2025-05-06 P & Z Packet CITY OF CENTERVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, May 6, 2025 6:30 p.m. Meeting Live Streamed at: https://northmetrotv.com/centerville-stream/ MEETING (6:30 PM) CALL TO ORDER Roll Call PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF AGENDA PUBLIC HEARINGS (6:30 PM or shortly thereafter) Chapter 156 Zoning Ordinance & Table of Allowed Uses Variance Request Î Dreamscape/AlexÓs (Sign) Variance Request Î 1421 Mound Trail Î Accessory Structure Garage) AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, APPEARANCES None OLD BUSINESS None NEW BUSINESS Variance Request Î Dreamscape/AlexÓs (Sign) Variance Request Î 1421 Mound Trail Î Accessory Structure (Garage) APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 1, 2025, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes 1 IX.ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES 1.Council Member Liaison 2.AdministratorÓs Report X.ADJOURNMENT INFORMATION 1.Additional information on Variances 2 CITY OF CENTERVILLEREQUEST FOR ACTION Agenda Item # Department: RequestedMeetingDate: May 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning IV. TITLE OF ISSUE: Chapter 156 Zoning Ordinance & Table of Allowed Uses BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: A public hearing will be held at the May 6, 2025 Planning & Zoning Commission to receive public input on proposed revisions to the city code. Proposed revisions provide clarification on select definitions and intent with regard to accessory structures. Since the revisions are still in progress, we will plan to open up the public hearing, receive comments, and table this item for further discussion at the following meeting. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: N/A REQUESTED ACTION: Staff Report is Given Open Public Hearing ReceiPublic Input Motion to Table the Public Hearing the Following Meeting For ClerkÓs Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: ____________________________________ Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: ____________________________________ Vote Record: Aye Nay Other (specify) ____________ ______________________________________________________________ _____ _______________________________________________________________ Refer to: _________________________________ Tabled Until: ______________________________ Consent Other: ___________________________________ Regular 3 4 CITY OF CENTERVILLEREQUEST FOR ACTION Agenda Item # Department: RequestedMeetingDate: May 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning IV.2 TITLE OF ISSUE: Public Hearing on Variance Request - Dreamscape (Alex's) - Sign BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: A public hearing will be held at the May 6, 2025 Planning & Zoning Commission to receive public input on a request for a sign variance for Dreamcape (Alex's). See the memo for additional information. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: N/A REQUESTED ACTION: Staff Report is Given Open Public Hearing Receive Public Input Motion to Close the Public Hearing For ClerkÓs Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: ____________________________________ Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: ____________________________________ Vote Record: Aye Nay Memo Other (specify) ____________ ______________________________________________________________ _____ _______________________________________________________________ Refer to: _________________________________ Tabled Until: ______________________________ Consent Other: ___________________________________ Regular 5 NOTICE OF HEARING The City of Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, May 6, 2025, at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter on the following matter: ITEM: Variance PETITIONER: Shuda Properties, LLC/DBA Dreamscapes Landscaping & Design PROPERTY I.D. #: R#23-31-22-14-0076 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1 BLK 1, TOWER ADDITION TH ADDRESS: 7087 Î 20 Avenue South, Centerville, MN 55038 The petitioner requests that the City grant a variance to allow the construction of a pylon sign less than the required 15-foot setback per City Code, Chapter 152.18: District Regulations, (B) Commercial/Main Street Commercial District (B-1 & B-2), (4). The petitioner believes that their sign should be in line with other businesses along the roadway and that property was taken by the Anoka County Highway Department and no fault of his own. City Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assisted devices or a sign language interpreter must be received before 4:00 p.m., April 25, 2025. All individuals interested are invited to attend and to be heard or may submit written concerns. You may contact the City ClerkÓs office at (651) 792-7933 or by facsimile (651) 429-8629 if you need additional information. Published in the Quad Community Press April 22, 2025. 6 7 8 10 11 SAIKO PROPERTIESPIN: 24-31-22-23-000720630 KEEWAHTIN AVE NFOREST LAKE, MN 55025X 7031 HOLDINGS LLCPIN: 23-31-22-14-00667031 20TH AVE SCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X CENTERVILLE CITY OFPIN: 23-31-22-14-00771880 MAIN STCENTERVILLE, MN 55038 NEUTKENS CHRISTIAAN T & PAMELAPIN: 23-31-22-14-00337054 COTTONWOOD CTCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X ANDERSON, DEAN EPIN: 24-31-22-23-00051630 CO RD H2WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110X KNABE HOLDINGS LLCPIN: 23-31-22-14-006712573 FOXHILL AVE NHUGO, MN 55038X THRAMER ALYCIAPIN: 23-31-22-14-00261970 MAIN STCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X ANDERSON IRA, JULIEPIN: 24-31-22-23-00061630 COUNTY RD H2WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110X HASELEY, SKIPPPIN: 23-31-22-14-00327060 COTTONWOOD CTCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X NYBERG, BRIAN DAVIDPIN: 23-31-22-14-00287092 COTTONWOOD CTCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X POLAR PRIDE PROPERTIES LLCPIN: 23-31-22-14-00741990 MAIN STCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X BEDNAR RYAN A & TAMMY LPIN: 23-31-22-14-00317068 COTTONWOOD CTCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X COLVARD BRIAN T & LISA LPIN: 23-31-22-14-00307072 COTTONWOOD CTCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X SCOTT TRUSTEE JAMES LESTERPIN: 23-31-22-14-00297084 COTTONWOOD CTCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X CENTERVILLE TOWNOFFICE PK MASTER ASSOCPIN: 23-31-22-14-00727029 20TH AVE SCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X PEREZ OSCARPIN: 23-31-22-14-00031980 MAIN STCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X CENTERVILLE TOWNOFFICE PK MASTER ASSOCPIN: 23-31-22-14-00717029 20TH AVE SCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X CENTERVILLE CITY OFPIN: 23-31-22-14-00531880 MAIN STCENTERVILLE, MN 55038 LARSON, RYAN CPIN: 23-31-22-14-00357044 COTTONWOOD CTCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X CRE MSP LLCPIN: 23-31-22-14-0059PO BOX 68073MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55418X POLAR PRIDE PROPERTIES LLCPIN: 23-31-22-14-00751990 MAIN STCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X DAHLIN COREYPIN: 23-31-22-14-00347048 COTTONWOOD CTCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X CRE MSP LLCPIN: 23-31-22-14-0060PO BOX 68073MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55418X EAGLE BROOK CHURCHPIN: 23-31-22-14-00737015 20TH AVECENTERVILLE, MN 55038X MCKASY BROTHERS LLCPIN: 24-31-22-23-001812 EAST OAKS RDST PAUL, MN 55127X SHUDA PROPERTIES LLCPIN: 23-31-22-14-00767087 20TH AVE SCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X REMILLARD MARKPIN: 23-31-22-14-00657029 20TH AVECENTERVILLE, MN 55038X RENCHIN THOMAS JPIN: 23-31-22-14-00277098 COTTONWOOD CTCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X LUNDHOLM HALPER LLCPIN: 23-31-22-14-00687039 20TH AVE SCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X POLAR PRIDE PROPERTIES LLCPIN: 23-31-22-14-00181990 MAIN STCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X 12 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Planning Report DATE: May 6, 2025 TO: Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Phil Carlson, AICP, Kribashini Moorthy, AICP Candidate; Stantec APPLICANTS: Shuda Properties, LLC/DBA Dreamscapes Landscaping & Design OWNER: Shuda Properties, LLC REQUEST: Variance Ï Setback for Pylon Sign th Avenue South ADDRESS: 7087 20 PID: 23-31-22-14-0076 INTRODUCTION th The property at 7087 20 Avenue South is owned by Shuda Properties, LLC, in the B-1 zoning district. Currently the property does not have a freestanding sign, and they wish th to construct a pylon sign along 20 Avenue. In §152.18 DISTRICT REGULATIONS of Centerville City code, a business may have one pylon sign, or one ground sign and it may be located at a minimum of 15 feet from any property line to the nearest supporting structure of the sign. The owner wishes to build a pylon sign that is less than 15 ft th from the property line along 20 Avenue and therefore requests a variance. PROPERTY & REQUEST th Avenue S, The applicants are requesting a pylon sign 3.5 ft from the right-of-way (ROW) of 20 instead of the required 15 ft, illustrated in the map from the applicant on the next page (north is to the left). The yellow property lines on the aerial photo show that Anoka County widened the ROW next to this property some time ago by 20 feet. The ROW was not widened on the property to the north (Shell station, Wise Guys Pizza, NyÔs Liquor, etc.) The smaller aerial photo on the next page (north up) shows the difference in ROW width Ï 20 ft. Without the ROW take, the owner(s) would have been able to place a pylon sign where they want it in their parking and easily meet the 15- foot setback. 13 May 6, 2025 Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 of 6 th RE: 7087 20 Avenue South, Variance Ï Setback for Pylon Sign Requiring this applicant to meet the setback would require placing the sign within the parking lot, interfering with driving maneuvers and would reduce its visibility compared to the other businesses on this road. VARIANCE STANDARDS on The CityÔs standards for considering variances, based criteria in State statute, are in Section 156.310, excerpted at the end of this report. A variance is Ñpermission to break the rulesÒ and should only be granted if there are unique or extraordinary circumstances that justify it. (A) Standards. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend a variance, and the Council shall order the issuance of the variance only if it conforms to the following standards (§ 156.310 VARIANCES): (1) The variance is in harmony with the purposes and intent of the zoning chapter of this code; The intent of the signage standards is to allow reasonable signage for businesses without being offensive or creating visual clutter. Here, the sign could have been placed in the requested location but for Anoka CountyÔs RWO acquisition. The sign itself is within the intent and purpose of the code. (2) The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan; There are general policies in the Comprehensive Plan about creating cohesive signage standards in the City. The requested variance would be in line with those goals, even though it encroaches on the required setback. 14 May 6, 2025 Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 of 6 th RE: 7087 20 Avenue South, Variance Ï Setback for Pylon Sign (3) The proposal puts the property to use in a reasonable manner; A pylon sign for a business in the commercial district is by itself a reasonable use. (4) There are unique circumstances to the property not created by the landowner; The Anoka County Highway Department acquired ROW along 20th Avenue S, pushing the property line west by 20 feet. This is unique to this property and not created by the applicant. (5) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and The variance aligns with the general character of the locality and neighboring pylon signs. RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the variance for the th construction of the pylon sign 3.5 feet from the ROW of 20 Avenue S as requested by the applicant, Shuda Properties, LCC/ DBA Dreamscapes Landscaping and Design, published on April 22, 2025, with the following conditions and findings of fact: Conditions of Approval of Variance 1) The applicant will apply for a sign permit for a sign meeting this variance approval and the CityÔs signage area and height standards Ï it shall not exceed 200 square feet in area and 35 feet in height, and not less than six feet from the ground to the lowest part of the sign. Findings of Fact for Approval of Variance 1) Shuda Properties, LLC owns the existing lot at 7087 20th Avenue South. 2) The existing lot does not have a pylon sign. th 3) A portion of the property along 20 Avenue South was acquired by the Anoka County Highway Department, pushing their property line west by 20 feet. th 4) The applicant proposes to construct a sign that is 3.5 feet from the ROW of 20 Avenue South. 5) Centerville Zoning Code standards require a 15-foot setback for signs from any property line. 6) The requested sign placement will not significantly impact surrounding properties and meets the standards for approval of variance in § 156.310 of the Centerville Zoning Code. 60-DAY DEADLINE The applications were received on March 31, 2025. The 60-day deadline for final action by the City Council per MN Statute 15.99 on the variance request is May 31, 2025. 15 May 6, 2025 Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 of 6 th RE: 7087 20 Avenue South, Variance Ï Setback for Pylon Sign § 156.310 VARIANCES. (A) Standards. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend a variance and the Council shall order the issuance of the variance only if it conforms to the following standards: (1) The variance is in harmony with the purposes and intent of the zoning chapter of this code; (2) The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan; and (3) The proposal puts the property to use in a reasonable manner; and (4) There are unique circumstances to the property not created by the landowner; and (5) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and (6) Any person filing a petition requesting a variance or an amendment of the zoning chapter rezoning property or changing regulations within any use district shall pay a fee according to the schedule established by resolution or ordinance of the City Council. The fee is payable at the time of filing a petition and is not refundable. § 152.18 DISTRICT REGULATIONS (B) Commercial / Main Street Commercial District (B-1 & B-2). A business may have one Pylon Sign or one Ground Sign in addition to permitted Wall Signs. Total surface area for all permitted signs shall not exceed 20% of the area of the largest street-side face of the building. (4) Pylon sign. One (1) pylon sign per business or business complex; provided, however, the sign does not exceed 200 square feet in area and 35 feet in height, not less than six feet from the ground to the lowest part of the sign and located a minimum of fifteen feet from any property line to the nearest supporting structure of the sign. 16 CHAPTER152:CHAPTER152:SIGNREGULATIONSSIGNREGULATIONS Section General Provisions 152.01 Title 152.02 Purpose and intent 152.03 Definitions General Regulations 152.15 General regulations 152.16 Permitted signs with no permit required 152.17 Portable signs 152.18 District regulations 152.19 Comprehensive sign plan required 152.20 Adjustments and appeals 152.21 Nonconforming signs 152.22 Enforcement 152.99 Penalty GENERAL PROVISIONS § 152.01 TITLE. This chapter shall be known as the Centerville Signage Ordinance, except as herein referred to as this chapter. Ord. #39, adopted - § 152.02 PURPOSE AND INTENT. It is the purpose of this chapter to: (A)Establish a set of standards for the fabrication, erection, use and maintenance for signs, symbols, markings, advertising devices or other items that serve as visual communication media; 263΋tğŭĻ 17 (5)Portable signs may not exceed 80 square feet. Ord. #39. § 152.18 DISTRICT REGULATIONS. § 152.18 DISTRICT REGULATIONS. (A)Residential/Public Districts (R-1, R-2, R-2A, R-4, R-5, P-1, M-1, M-2). Permitted signs: (1)Residential identifications. Not more than two square feet per single family dwelling or six square feet in area for each multiple-family building. (2)Institutional identifications. Churches, schools, parks etc. allowed up to 48 square feet; not taller than eight feet. (3)Business signs. Home-based businesses may have a sign that is no larger than four square feet. The sign may not be an interior-illuminated sign. (4)Noncommercial opinion or message signs. On-premise noncommercial opinion or message signs are permitted as follows: In residential districts, each dwelling unit is permitted one additional sign which is no larger than six square feet and no higher than six feet tall. In medium and high density districts, the sign must be attached to the dwelling. No permit fee is required for a sign authorized under this paragraph. (5)Area Identification Signs. One area identification sign is permitted in conjunction with a development or subdivision, however the sign shall not exceed 48 square feet in area and 8 feet in height and shall only be permitted when a homeowner association or other responsible entity has been established that agrees in writing to maintain the sign and adjoining property. (B)(B)Commercial / Main Street Commerical District (B-1 & B-2).Commercial / Main Street Commerical District (()B-1 & B-2). A business may have one Pylon Sign or A business may have one Pylon Sign or one Ground Sign in addition to permitted Wall Signs. Total surface area for all permitted signs shall not one Ground Siggpgn in addition to permitted Wall Signs. Total surface area for all permitted signs shall notp exceed 20% of the area of the largest street-side face of the building. Permitted signs: exceed 20% of the area of the largest street-side face of the building. Permitted signs: (1)Wall signs. Wall signs are permitted on each public street exposure or public parking exposure, provided the signage does not exceed ten percent of the wall area, and the sign does not exceed 200 square feet in area. (2)Ground signs. One ground sign per business or business complex; provided, however, the sign does not exceed 200 square feet in area and 15 feet in height, and located a minimum of fifteen feet from any property line to the nearest supporting structure of the sign. (3)Area identification signs. One area identification sign is permitted per street frontage; however, the sign does not exceed 64 square feet in area and 20 feet in height, and located a minimum of fifteen feet from any property line to the nearest supporting structure of the sign. 270΋tğŭĻ 18 (4)(4)Pylon sign.Pylon sign.yg One (1) pylon sign per business or business complex; provided, however, the sign One (()pygp1) pylon sign per business or business complex; provided, however, the signp;p,, does not exceed 200 square feet in area and 35 feet in height, not less than six feet from the does not exceed 200 sqquare feet in area and 35 feet in heigg,ht, not less than six feet from the ground to the lowest part of the sign, and located a minimum of fifteen feet from any property gpground to the lowest part of the sign, and located a minimum of g,fifteen feet from any property line to the nearest supporting structure of the sign. line to the nearest supporting structure of the sign. (5)Billboard signs. As otherwise regulated in this Chapter. (C)Industrial District (I-1). Permitted signs: (1)Wall signs. Wall signs are permitted on each public street exposure or public parking exposure provided the signage does not exceed ten percent of the wall area. (2)Ground signs. One (1) Ground sign ; provided, however, the sign does not exceed 200 square feet in area 15 feet in height and located a minimum of fifteen from any property lines. (3)Area identification signs. One area identification sign is permitted per street frontage; however, the sign does not exceed 64 square feet in area and 20 feet in height, and is not placed within ten feet of any street right-of-way. (4)Billboard signs. As otherwise regulated in this Chapter. (D)Mixed-Use Districts (M-1 & M-2). Permitted signs: (1)Wall signs. Wall signs are permitted on each public street exposure or public parking exposure, provided the signage does not exceed ten percent of the wall area. (2)Canopy signs. Signs on these structures are allowed as long as the sign area does not exceed ten percent of the wall area. (3)Ground signs. One ground sign is permitted per street frontage; however, the sign does not exceed eight feet in height and 32 feet in area. Ord. #39; Ord. #87, amended 01/11/2006; Ord. 2d #12, amended 09/13/2006; Ord. 2d 120, adopted 01/26/2022 § 152.19 COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN REQUIRED. (A) (1) A comprehensive sign plan is required at the time of Planning and Zoning Commission review of any proposed new commercial or industrial development. This plan shall indicate the location, size, height, color, lighting and orientation of all proposed signs and shall be submitted for approval pursuant to the regulations of the city. (2) Building permits and inspections are necessary as required by Building and Electrical Code. Fees for required permits or hearings shall be set by approved annual resolution of the City Council. 271΋tğŭĻ 19 NOTICE OF HEARING The City of Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, May 6, 2025, at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter on the following matter: ITEM: Variance PETITIONER: Shuda Properties, LLC/DBA Dreamscapes Landscaping & Design PROPERTY I.D. #: R#23-31-22-14-0076 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1 BLK 1, TOWER ADDITION TH ADDRESS: 7087 Î 20 Avenue South, Centerville, MN 55038 The petitioner requests that the City grant a variance to allow the construction of a pylon sign less than the required 15-foot setback per City Code, Chapter 152.18: District Regulations, (B) Commercial/Main Street Commercial District (B-1 & B-2), (4). The petitioner believes that their sign should be in line with other businesses along the roadway and that property was taken by the Anoka County Highway Department and no fault of his own. City Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assisted devices or a sign language interpreter must be received before 4:00 p.m., April 25, 2025. All individuals interested are invited to attend and to be heard or may submit written concerns. You may contact the City ClerkÓs office at (651) 792-7933 or by facsimile (651) 429-8629 if you need additional information. Published in the Quad Community Press April 22, 2025. 20 21 22 24 25 SAIKO PROPERTIESPIN: 24-31-22-23-000720630 KEEWAHTIN AVE NFOREST LAKE, MN 55025X 7031 HOLDINGS LLCPIN: 23-31-22-14-00667031 20TH AVE SCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X CENTERVILLE CITY OFPIN: 23-31-22-14-00771880 MAIN STCENTERVILLE, MN 55038 NEUTKENS CHRISTIAAN T & PAMELAPIN: 23-31-22-14-00337054 COTTONWOOD CTCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X ANDERSON, DEAN EPIN: 24-31-22-23-00051630 CO RD H2WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110X KNABE HOLDINGS LLCPIN: 23-31-22-14-006712573 FOXHILL AVE NHUGO, MN 55038X THRAMER ALYCIAPIN: 23-31-22-14-00261970 MAIN STCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X ANDERSON IRA, JULIEPIN: 24-31-22-23-00061630 COUNTY RD H2WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110X HASELEY, SKIPPPIN: 23-31-22-14-00327060 COTTONWOOD CTCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X NYBERG, BRIAN DAVIDPIN: 23-31-22-14-00287092 COTTONWOOD CTCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X POLAR PRIDE PROPERTIES LLCPIN: 23-31-22-14-00741990 MAIN STCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X BEDNAR RYAN A & TAMMY LPIN: 23-31-22-14-00317068 COTTONWOOD CTCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X COLVARD BRIAN T & LISA LPIN: 23-31-22-14-00307072 COTTONWOOD CTCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X SCOTT TRUSTEE JAMES LESTERPIN: 23-31-22-14-00297084 COTTONWOOD CTCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X CENTERVILLE TOWNOFFICE PK MASTER ASSOCPIN: 23-31-22-14-00727029 20TH AVE SCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X PEREZ OSCARPIN: 23-31-22-14-00031980 MAIN STCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X CENTERVILLE TOWNOFFICE PK MASTER ASSOCPIN: 23-31-22-14-00717029 20TH AVE SCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X CENTERVILLE CITY OFPIN: 23-31-22-14-00531880 MAIN STCENTERVILLE, MN 55038 LARSON, RYAN CPIN: 23-31-22-14-00357044 COTTONWOOD CTCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X CRE MSP LLCPIN: 23-31-22-14-0059PO BOX 68073MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55418X POLAR PRIDE PROPERTIES LLCPIN: 23-31-22-14-00751990 MAIN STCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X DAHLIN COREYPIN: 23-31-22-14-00347048 COTTONWOOD CTCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X CRE MSP LLCPIN: 23-31-22-14-0060PO BOX 68073MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55418X EAGLE BROOK CHURCHPIN: 23-31-22-14-00737015 20TH AVECENTERVILLE, MN 55038X MCKASY BROTHERS LLCPIN: 24-31-22-23-001812 EAST OAKS RDST PAUL, MN 55127X SHUDA PROPERTIES LLCPIN: 23-31-22-14-00767087 20TH AVE SCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X REMILLARD MARKPIN: 23-31-22-14-00657029 20TH AVECENTERVILLE, MN 55038X RENCHIN THOMAS JPIN: 23-31-22-14-00277098 COTTONWOOD CTCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X LUNDHOLM HALPER LLCPIN: 23-31-22-14-00687039 20TH AVE SCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X POLAR PRIDE PROPERTIES LLCPIN: 23-31-22-14-00181990 MAIN STCENTERVILLE, MN 55038X 26 CITY OF CENTERVILLEREQUEST FOR ACTION Agenda Item # Department: RequestedMeetingDate: May 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning IV.3 TITLE OF ISSUE: 1421 Mound Trail - Variance for Accessory Structure BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: A public hearing will be held at the May 6, 2025 Planning & Zoning Commission to receive input on a request for a variance on an accessory structure See the memo for additional information. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: N/A REQUESTED ACTION: Staff Report is Given Open Public Hearing Receive Public Input Motion to Close the Public Hearing For ClerkÓs Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: ____________________________________ Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: ____________________________________ Vote Record: Aye Nay Memo, drawings Other (specify) ____________ ______________________________________________________________ _____ _______________________________________________________________ Refer to: _________________________________ Tabled Until: ______________________________ Consent Other: ___________________________________ Regular 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Planning Report DATE: May 6, 2025 TO: Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Phil Carlson, AICP, Stantec APPLICANTS: Jim and Mary Heron OWNER: Thomas (Jim) and Mary Heron REQUEST: Variance Ï Accessory Structure Setback ADDRESS: 1421 Mound Trail PID: 15-31-22-43-0017 INTRODUCTION Jim and Mary Heron own the single-family lot at 1421 Mound Trail, a lakeshore lot on Centerville Lake in the R-2 zoning district. They want to build a new accessory structure in front of the house and are requesting a variance to the front setback for the structure. There was informal discussion of this request at a previous Planning and Zoning Commission meeting with analysis of ÑyardsÒ, setbacks, and definitions of setbacks on lakeshore lots. Those questions are handled in a separate memorandum for this P&Z meeting. For this request, we will rely on the CityÔs precedent in dealing with accessory structure setbacks in 156.107(A)(4): Ñ no accessory structure shall be erected or located within any required yard other than the rear yardÒ. This standard has been interpreted over the years to mean that no such structures are allowed in the front of the lot without a variance and can only be allowed in the rear yard. One of the questions that came up with this request is, where is the rear yard? There was discussion of the common law provision that lakeshore lots consider the front yard to face the water. The City Attorney has clarified that the City of Centerville has authority within its zoning regulations to define and regulate placement of structures, including where the front and rear yards are. City zoning regulations would supersede the common law provision. The Centerville Zoning Code defines the front yard as having frontage on the street and the rear yard is opposite the front. For lakeshore lots like 1421 Mounds Trail which front on a street with the lake behind, the street side is the front, and the lake side is the rear, although there are different, more restrictive setbacks from the lake (75 ft) that would supersede the standard rear yard setback of 25 ft. 34 May 6, 2025 Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 of 6 RE: 1421 Mound Trail, Variance Request Ï Accessory Structure Setback The property is a lakeshore lot on Centerville Lake, about 105 ft wide by 350 ft deep. The house is situated about 100 ft from the lakeshore, leaving a ÑfrontÒ yard about 200-220 ft deep between the house and Mound Trail right-of-way. The Ñrear yardÒ (green shaded area to the right) is defined as between the rear lot line and the rear line of the building. There is little room on the lakeshore side to put in a new structure meeting the lakeshore setback. The request is therefore a variance to the front setback, the only reasonable place to put the structure on this lot. VARIANCE CRITERIA The standards for considering a variance are excerpted at the end of this report and summarized below. (1) The variance is in harmony with the purposes and intent of the zoning chapter of this code; (2) The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan; The request does not directly relate to issues in the comprehensive plan or zoning code, other than the required setback, which is the request here. (3) The proposal puts the property to use in a reasonable manner; Building an accessory structure of this scale is a reasonable use of residential property. (4) There are unique circumstances to the property not created by the landowner; The unique circumstance here is the arrangement of structures on the lot Ï the house is set very far back from the street leaving a very large front yard but almost no rear yard where an accessory structure would typically be. This is a situation not created by the property owner and is relatively unique, even among lakeshore lots. 35 May 6, 2025 Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 of 6 RE: 1421 Mound Trail, Variance Request Ï Accessory Structure Setback (5) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. There are several properties in the immediate area that have accessory structures in the front yard, similar to what is proposed on this lot, illustrated below. The proposed structure would not alter the Ñessential characterÒ of the area, i.e., it would not look out of place. 36 May 6, 2025 Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission Page 4 of 6 RE: 1421 Mound Trail, Variance Request Ï Accessory Structure Setback HEIGHT The proposed building will meet the Centerville Zoning Code standards for the height of an accessory building. The definition of ÑheightÒ in the Centerville is typical of many zoning ordinances in that it considers the height of a pitched roof to be the average between the eaves and the peak (ÑridgeÒ in CentervilleÔs code). This is because the perceived height of a pitched roof is less than that of a flat roof. The height of accessory buildings is limited to 15 feet, unless it matches the slope of the principal structure (the house). That is the case here: the new building has a roof pitch similar to the house and its height is calculated as 16.55 ft according to the definition, as illustrated below, therefore no variance is needed for the height of the structure. SIZE OF STRUCTURE The size of accessory buildings is limited to 2% of the lot size. The lot at 1421 Mound Trail is approximately 40,075 sq ft in area, which would allow a structure of 802 sq ft, exactly what is proposed by the applicants. RECOMMENDATION I recommend that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the variance to the front yard setback for an accessory building at 1421 Mound Trail as depicted on the submitted materials from applicant Jim Heron, with the following conditions and findings of fact: Conditions for Approval 1) The new accessory building will match the style, color and roof slope of the existing house on site. Findings of Fact for Approval 37 May 6, 2025 Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission Page 5 of 6 RE: 1421 Mound Trail, Variance Request Ï Accessory Structure Setback 1) Thomas and Mary Heron (ÑApplicantsÒ) own the property at 1421 Mound Trail, legally described as Lot 9 Block 1 THE SHORES, Anoka County, in the R-2 zoning district. 2) The Applicants propose to build an accessory structure on the north part of the lot within the required front setback. 3) The request complies with the comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance, other than for the required front setback. 4) The use of an accessory building on a residential lot is reasonable. 5) There are unique circumstances on this lot that pose practical difficulties to meet the ordinance setback standard. The house is situated on the south part of the lot near the lake, leaving only a very small rear yard where an accessory building would typically be required to be located, not enough space for a reasonable structure. There is ample room in the front of the lot, which is where the Applicants propose the new structure. These are circumstances not created by the Applicants. 6) The proposed structure will not alter the essential character of the locality, since there are similarly located accessary buildings in the front yards of several properties in the immediate vicinity. 7) The request satisfies the standards for approving a variance in Section 156.310 of the Centerville zoning ordinance. 38 May 6, 2025 Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission Page 6 of 6 RE: 1421 Mound Trail, Variance Request Ï Accessory Structure Setback ZONING CODE EXCERPTS AND DEFINITIONS § 156.310 VARIANCES. (A) Standards. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend a variance and the Council shall order the issuance of the variance only if it conforms to the following standards: (1) The variance is in harmony with the purposes and intent of the zoning chapter of this code; (2) The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan; and (3) The proposal puts the property to use in a reasonable manner; and (4) There are unique circumstances to the property not created by the landowner; and (5) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and (6) Any person filing a petition requesting a variance or an amendment of the zoning chapter rezoning property or changing regulations within any use district shall pay a fee according to the schedule established by resolution or ordinance of the City Council. The fee is payable at the time of filing a petition and is not refundable. . . . HEIGHT OF BUILDING. The vertical distance from the average elevation of the finished grade at the front of the building to the highest point of the roof for flat roofs; to the deck line of mansard roofs; and to the mean height between eaves and ridge for gable, hip and gambrel roofs. . . . § 156.107 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES AND USES. (A) Accessory Structures Î Residential Uses . . . (11) The side walls of an accessory building shall not exceed 10 feet in height and the overall height of the structure shall not exceed 15 feet, except to match the roof slope of the principal structure. This provision shall not apply to farm buildings located in an R-1 District. 39 BUILDER / OWNER OR THE USER OF THESE PLANS. XX-XX-XX (NN) PLANS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. ADDITION:1BLOCK:9LOT: STRUCTURAL MATERIALS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FINAL REDLINES UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESE REQUIREMENTS. THE SELECTION AND APPLICATION OF CORRECT STATES COPYRIGHT LAW. ANY INCLUDING COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE XX-XX-XX (NN) AND ARE PROTECTED BY UNITED CONSTRUCTION. NO WARRANTIES ARE EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED 12-10-2024DATE: REVISION #3 TMP HOMES,LLC. ANY ERRORS & OMISSIONS FOR POSSIBLE CORRECTIONS PRIOR TO XX-XX-XX (NN) CENTERVILLE, MN 55038 COPYRIGHTED PROPERTY OF SECTIONS, AND FLOOR PLANS AND NOTIFY SAID DRAFTSMAN OF * MARVIN ELEVATE & ESSENTIAL WINDOWS REVISION #2 OWNER MUST VERIFY AND CHECK ALL NOTES, DETAILS, ELEVATIONS, THE PLANS ARE THE EXCLUSIVE 1421 MOUND TRAILADDRESS:NNDRAWN BY: * WINDOW HEADER HEIGHTS PER PLAN ERRORS OR OMISSIONS. THE CONTRACTOR, BUILDER, AND/OR THE CONSTRUCTED PURSUANT TO XX-XX-XX (NN) ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR STRUCTURAL & DIMENSIONAL THESE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND * CEILING HEIGHTS PER PLAN REVISION #1 NATHAN NEWMAN OR TMP HOMES, LLC. 4601JOB#:BUYER: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. COPYRIGHTGENERAL NOTESLAST REVISED BY A DRAFTSMAN WHO IS NOT A REGISTERED ARCHITECT OR THE PLANS FURNISHED HEREWITH WERE PREPARED UPON REQUEST GARAGE FLOOR PLAN FRONT ELEVATION 802 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE GOLF ROOM COVERED PATIO 40 CROSS SECTION Large Trees @ Road 15'-0" New Proposed Garage & Covered Patio Area 802 sq. ft. New Proposed Pool Area (20’x40’ Pool) 41 42 (1)The building or structure is compatible in appearance, age and character with existing buildings and structures in the area; (2)The building or structure meets all code requirements for new buildings or structures; (3)The building or structure is compatible with any other buildings or structures existing on the same property; and (4)The building or structure meets all other requirements of this chapter and any other city ordinances. § 156.107 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES AND USES. § 156.107 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES AND USES. (A)Accessory Structures Î Residential Uses (A)Accessory Structures Î Residential Uses (1)No more than two detached accessory buildings are permitted on any single-family, detached (1)No more than two detached accessory buildingsyg are permitted on any single-family, detachedpygy, dwelling parcel located in any district except R-1. Combined aggregate square footage for dwellinggpparcel located in anyydistrict exceppt R-1. Combined agggggqgregate square footage for detached accessory structures shall not exceed 200 square feet or 2% of the lot area, whichever is detached accessoryy structures shall not exceed 200 sqquare feet or 2% of the lot area, whichever is, greater, except if the lot has no attached garage, the largest detached structure may not exceed g,pgreater, except if the lot has no attttached garage, the largest detached structure may not exceedgg the square footage of the main floor dwelling. the square footage of the main floor dwelling. (2)In no event may any accessory building exceed the square footage of the main level of the principal structure, except in the R-1 District. (3)No accessory structure may be constructed on a parcel without a principal structure. (4)No accessory structure shall be erected or located within any required yard other than the rear (4)No accessory structure shall be erected or located within any required yard other than the rear yard. yard. (5)Detached accessory buildings must have a minimum of a 5-foot interior side setback and a 10- foot rear setback. Where a rear or side yard abuts a street, an accessory building shall be set back a minimum of 20 feet from the street property line. No structure may be placed in an easement except bridges by written permit approved by the City Council. (6)In case an accessory structure is attached to the main building, it shall be made structurally a part of the main building and shall comply in all respects with the requirements of this chapter applicable to the main building. (7)An accessory building, unless attached to and made a part of the main building, shall not be closer than 6 feet to the main building, except as otherwise provided in this section. (8)The total area of an attached accessory building (garage) shall be no greater than 1,500 square feet per level, but in no event may the garage space exceed the square footage of the main floor of the dwelling. 364 ΋tğŭĻ 43 (9)Detached parking garages for residential uses may be allowed to exceed the area limitations above, but only with a finding that underground or attached parking is impractical or infeasible. (10)Swimming pools may exceed the size requirements for accessory structures, but shall not exceed 50% of the rear yard. (11)The side walls of an accessory building shall not exceed 10 feet in height and the overall height (11)The side walls of an accessoryyg building shall not exceed 10 feet in heiggght and the overall height of the structure shall not exceed 15 feet, except to match the roof slope of the principal structure. of the structure shall not exceed 15 feet,,p except to match the roof slope of pthe principal structure. This provision shall not apply to farm buildings located in a R-1 District. This provision shall not apply to farm buildings located in a R-1 District. (12)Arbors, trellises, balconies, breezeways, open porches, detached outdoor living rooms, and heating equipment may be placed in a rear yard if it is at least 15 feet from the rear lot line and five feet from a side lot line, but may not be closer to a side street property line than the principal structure. (13)Neither building with metal roofs and exterior walls and covering a total (exterior) area in excess of 120 square feet, nor any other buildings with metal roofs shall be permitted in any residential or mixed use district (except where the principal structure has a permitted architectural metal roof, in which case a metal roof of the same permitted materials may be used). Pole-type buildings and rigid frame structures with membrane roof or sides, are also prohibited all zoning districts. (Ord. 2d #32, amended 09/09/2009) (14)Building exceeding 120 square feet shall be anchored to a concrete floating slab foundation. (15)The exterior color and design of an accessory structure shall be similar to the principal structure. (B)Accessory structures, non-residential uses. The following standards shall regulate the construction and maintenance of non-residential accessory structures: (1)No more than two detached accessory buildings are permitted on any parcel. Combined aggregate square footage for detached accessory structures shall not exceed 1000 square feet or 10% of the lot area, whichever is less. (2)In no event may any accessory building exceed the square footage of the main level of the principal structure. (3)No accessory structure may be constructed on a parcel without a principal structure. (4)No accessory structure shall be erected or located within the front yard. (5)The side walls of an accessory structure shall not exceed 10 feet in height and the overall height of the structure shall not exceed 15 feet, except to match the roof slope of the principal structure. 365 ΋tğŭĻ 44 Athanasia Lewis From:Dawn Kalina <dkalinacentervillemn@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, May 2, 2025 9:21 AM To:Athanasia Lewis Subject:Fwd: 1421 Mound Trail Variances - Cariveau Feedback (1407 Mound Trail) Attachments: 1421 Mound Attachment A - Front Yard Structures on Mound Trail.docx; 1421 Mound B - P&Z Commission History wResidential Variances.docx Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. Email I received from the resident at 1407 Mound Trail. ?êƜŏϼuêňĳŏê ¡ňêŏŏĳŏĩϼѐϼÛŗŏĳŏĩϼ9ŗŎŎĳŹŹĳŗŏđŵϼ 9ĳƂƢϼŗĨϼ9đŏƂđŵƚĳňňđ ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Allesandra Cariveau <acariveau@gmail.com> Date: Thu, May 1, 2025 at 11:32PM Subject: 1421 Mound Trail Variances - Cariveau Feedback (1407 Mound Trail) To: Dawn Kalina <dkalinacentervillemn@gmail.com>, Russ Koski <rkoski@centervillemn.com>, <dkubat@centervillemn.com> Good evening, Chair Kalina and City Council Liaisons Koski and Kubat, I'm writing to you today because I'm deeply concerned about the proposed project at 1421 Mound Trail and its impact on the character of our neighborhood and property value. I'm not trying to be a "difficult" neighbor, but I do need to protect our financial interests and I hope we can jointly come to an agreement that satisfies all parties. I first learned of the variance through attendance at the 4/1/25 P&Z Commission Meeting, and I understand this topic has been scheduled for Public Hearing on May 6, 2025. Approval of this project would result in a very large Recreational Structure (Pool House/Entertainment Area/Garage/Wet Bar/Covered Patio) and Swimming Pool/Deck/Fence in a front yard on Mound Trail. I am concerned by the Commission's consideration of the variance request(s) as this project: 1) Clearly alters the essential character of the locality, a condition that should in itself result in denial. 2) Is in opposition to previous Commission decisions upholding the Zoning Code of Ordinances over the past 20+ years. 3) Violates common practice and diminishes property value. 1 45 I have included details on each of these points below, as well as attachments covering: (A) Current Front Yard Structures on Mound Trail and (B) Commission decisions on Residential Variance Requests from 2005 - present. In summary, I respectfully request the Commission: Modify the 1421 Mound Trail variance request to: o Exclude the outdoor covered patio, as was done for the 1313 Mound Trail variance in 2021. o Limit the size of the proposed structure to comply with the Zoning Code and lessen impact to the essential character of the locality. Deny in its entirety any swimming pool/deck/fence built between the main structure and the street I understand we are relative newcomers to the neighborhood and community, and there are deep personal and professional relationships with interest in this project's approval. However, we also understand the Commission will act in accordance with the Code and State Statute in its evaluation as it has done in the past. Please let me know if you have any questions. I would also like some information on time allotment to speak at the 5/6/25 hearing (should I be able to attend) and details on the appeal process/timing should this variance request be approved by the Commission. Judging by the presence of various parties, including the City, in our yard this week marking various lines for the "garage and pool," it appears the applicant believes the Public Hearing is a formality. I trust that is not the case. We will be out of town frequently in the coming weeks/months; however I plan to be an active participant in this process, though it may be remotely. Thank you for your consideration and the preservation of our beautiful community. Allesandra Cariveau 1407 Mound Trail 612-618-4257 Alters Essential Character of Locality Variance Image received from Teresa Bender 4/25/25. Red outlines added. 2 46 Centerville Zoning Code dictates a variance can only be issued if it does not alter the essential character of the locality (Zoning Code 156.310 A.5.). Definition of altering essential character of locality from League of Minnesota Cities Land Use Variances (Also included in P&Z Agenda 10/1/24): жŵđŹƇňƂĳŏĩϼŹƂŵƇąƂƇŵđϼĳŹϼŗƇƂϼŗĨϼŹąêňđЃϼŗƇƂϼŗĨϼŲňêąđЃϼŗŵϼ ĳŏąŗŏŹĳŹƂđŏƂϼƜĳƂİϼŹƇŵŵŗƇŏċĳŏĩϼêŵđêЂжϼϼ The 1421 Mound Trail variance request is all three of these. ŗƇƂϼŗĨϼŹąêňđϼЄ Proposed accessory complex is nearly 2x the depth of the directly abutted 1407 Mound Trail main structure (applicant submitted image) Proposed accessory complex appears larger than the footprint of both 1407 Mound Trail and 1421 Mound Trail main structures (applicant submitted image) 3 47 Applicant acknowledges the proposal is larger than allowed by City Code in both size and height (5/6/25 Public Hearing announcement) ŗƇƂϼŗĨϼŲňêąđЄϼ Recreational complex would be the first thing seen entering Mound Trail after passing Mound Court Recreational complex would be directly abutted to 1407 Mound Trail rather than diagonally located from neighboring property as a typical swimming pool complex would be 1407 Mound Trail is not located on the lake. The premium property valuation is driven by the location and wooded privacy of Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Preserve across the street Applicant should not be allowed to take advantage of private location and lack of neighbors across Mound Trail to justify a non-compliant front yard project Applicant should not be allowed to negatively impact neighborhood character and property values for own enjoyment of clearly out of place complex ĳŏąŗŏŹĳŹƂđŏƂϼƜĳƂİϼƂİđϼŹƇŵŵŗƇŏċĳŏĩϼêŵđêЄ There are 7 existing "front yard" structures on Mound Trail used by the applicant to set precedence for this project. Attachment A - Current Front Yard Structures on Mound Trail. These structures are not similar to the 1421 Mound Trail variance request: All 7 are garages The footprint of each garage is significantly smaller Garages are adjacent to each other or other yards rather than abutted to the neighbor's primary structure There are no wet bars, full bathrooms, pool houses, recreational centers, golf simulators, two stories with stairs, or front yard covered entertainment patios. Covered patio expressly denied in 2021 variance request. The 7 precedent garages could not reasonably be used as dwellings. There are no front yard fences on Mound Trail. The 1421 Mound project would require a 4 foot fence in a front yard, also outside of Zoning Code. 6 of 7 garages were built decades ago, and the Commission considered location of structure, character of locality, and impact to neighboring properties before approval. 2021 variance had size and height of garage reduced by Commission Commission History of Honoring Zoning Code I reviewed every single P&Z Commission Meeting Minutes document published from 2005-Present. Residential variance decisions made by the Commission over the past 20 years demonstrate consistency in enforcement of the Zoning Code of Ordinances and do not support this project. Attachment B details the Commission's Decisions 2005-2025. There are 3 accessory structures which were approved for front yards on lake properties, as noted in Rust color on the supporting document. One of these is for the garage at 1313 Mound Trail and two are for storage sheds. ALL considered the essential character of the locality and neighboring properties before approval. ALL were within Code size requirements or modified by the Commission. 4 48 During this two decade time period, I also noted 5 variance requests approved for "hardship," "practical difficulties," or "unique property," as is asserted in the 1421 Mound Trail proposal. These are highlighted in Green on the supporting document. Of these approved variances: 4 of 5 approvals resulted from actions outside the applicant's control, i.e., caused by the City or County, and which were not present when the homeowner purchased the property. For example, the addition of a City Trail in a yard. The other approval was for a situation which existed upon purchase; however, it was for a property with no residential neighbors. ALL approvals assessed the impact on neighboring properties and ensured the project did not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. At the same time, many similar proposals were denied citing: Commission consensus to not set precedent Variance was in opposition to Code Applicant was not being denied reasonable use of the property without the variance Applicant purchased the property with the "hardship" in place Neighbor opposition due to several above factors Given the outcomes of previous variance requests, approval of the 1421 Mound Trail project would be a significant departure from past Commission decisions, as well as in opposition to the Zoning Code as written at both the City and State level. Violates Common Practice and Diminishes Property Value There are communities which define lakeshore homes as having their "front" yards facing the lake and "rear" yards as those between the structure and the street. However: In all communities contacted, this definition is applied where properties are aligned, i.e, all properties in the vicinity have the lake on one side and the street on the other. In this case, 1407 Mound Trail is not on the lake while 1421 Mound Trail is, and direct next door neighbors would have different definitions of front and rear yards. Minnesota cities that define lakeshore properties as having their "rear" yards between the main structure and the street limit accessory structures in these areas to garages and storage sheds. Swimming pools are expressly prohibited from being built between the main structure and the street. Swimming pools are not allowed in viewable yards as they are widely regarded as having a negative impact on neighborhood aesthetics and property values. In defining the Centerville Zoning Code, Commissioner Wood stated, "from a real estate perspective, pools actually devalue property." (P&Z Meeting Minutes 6/6/2006). As this project would be built in a yard directly abutting 1407 Mound Trail home, it would devalue this neighboring property as well. 5 49 There are currently 0/25 swimming pools in Centerville located between the main structure and the street. There are 2-3 properties on Mound Trail and several more on Centerville Lake alone which would have a case for precedence should this project proceed. In summary, the 1421 Mound Trail proposed variance alters the essential character of the locality, is in opposition to previous Commission decisions upholding the Zoning Code of Ordinances, does not qualify as a unique circumstance or practical difficulty, violates common practice and diminishes neighboring property value, and would set a negative precedence for future proposals in Centerville. As such, this project does not meet the criteria to be approved by the Commission. 6 50 This Handout was Received by Resident Allesandra Cariveau Residential Variance Requests Î 2025 to 2005 Published P&Z Minutes Reviewed (* = residential variance request discussed) 2025: 1/7, 2/4, 3/4* 2024: 1/2, 2/6, 3/4, 4/2 - No other Minutes published to website. Instead, reviewed Agendas 5/7, 6/4, 7/9*, 9/3, 10/1*, 11/12, 12/3 2023: 1/17, 2/7, 3/14, 4/4, 5/2, 6/6*, 7/10, 8/8, 9/5, 10/10, 12/5 2022: 1/4, 2/1, 3/1, 4/5, 5/3, 6/7, 7/19, 8/16, 9/13*, 10/4, 11/1 2021: 1/26*, 2/2, 3/2, 4/6, 4/26, 5/4, 6/8, 7/13*, 8/10, 9/7, 10/5, 11/2 2020: 1/7, 2/4, 3/10, 5/5, 7/7, 8/4*, 9/1*, 10/20, 12/8 2019: 1/8, 2/5, 3/5, 4/2, 5/7, 5/21, 7/9, 8/13, 9/3*, 10/1, 11/12* 2018: 1/2, 2/1, 3/6, 4/3, 5/1*, 6/5, 7/10*, 7/31*, 9/4, 10/2, 11/13, 12/4 2017: 1/3, 2/7, 4/4, 5/2, 6/6, 7/11, 8/8, 9/5, 10/3, 11/7, 12/5 2016: 1/5, 2/2, 3/8, 4/5*, 4/6, 5/3, 6/7*, 7/5, 8/8, 9/6, 10/4*, 12/6 2015: 3/3, 3/11, 4/7, 5/5, 6/2*, 7/7, 8/11, 9/1, 10/6, 11/2*, 12/1 2014: 1/7, 4/1, 6/3, 8/5, 9/2, 10/7, 11/3, 11/12, 12/2 2013: 1/2, 1/8, 2/5, 4/2, 5/7*, 6/4, 7/2*, 8/13*, 9/10, 10/1, 11/5, 12/3 2012: 1/3, 2/8, 4/3, 5/1, 6/5, 7/3, 8/7, 9/4, 10/2, 11/13, 12/4 2011: 1/4, 2/1, 3/1, 4/5, 5/3, 6/7, 7/5, 8/9, 10/4, 12/6* 2010: 3/2, 4/6, 5/11, 6/8, 7/6, 8/3, 9/7, 10/5, 11/9*, 12/14 2009: 1/6, 2/3, 3/3, 4/7, 5/5, 6/2, 7/7*, 8/4, 9/1*, 10/6, 12/1 2008: 1/8, 2/12, 3/4, 4/1, 5/6, 6/3, 7/1, 8/5*, 9/2, 10/7, 11/3 2007: 1/2*, 2/6*, 3/6*, 3/21, 5/1, 7/3*, 8/7, 9/4*, 10/2, 11/13, 12/4 2006: 1/3, 2/7, 3/14, 4/4, 5/2, 6/6, 7/11, 8/1, 9/5, 10/3, 11/14, 12/5 2005: 1/4, 2/1, 2/28, 4/5, 5/3, 6/7, 7/5, 8/2, 9/6, 10/4, 11/1, 12/6 1985: 6/4 Green = Variance approvals for Ðhardship,Ñ Ðpractical difficulties,Ñ Ðunique property characteristicsÑ Rust = Structures in front yard when rear yard on lake Date Address DescriptionResult Reason / Notes 3/4/25 1421 Mound Recreational structure & Open Public hearing pending 5/6 pool in front yard which exceeds size and height allowed for accessory structure 3/4/25, 7021 Increase driveway width Denied 7/9/24 Lamotte beyond 31Ó to pull RV trailer out 10/1/24 7214 Add 2nd driveway on Approved Issue not present when LaValle property, which is not homeowner purchased allowed by Code. Request is property - Bayview Villas to remove & replace existing project orphaned the driveway, driveway attached to tuck- i.e., not caused by homeowner. under garage and extend it Does not alter essential to roadway. character of neighborhood Î y small section of pavementÑ Ðonl 51 6/6/23 1746 Dupre Tear down and Approved Replacement of existing structure reconstruction of existing Does not alter essential character shed, increasing size by 2 Î shed already present; neighbors feet each side. expressed support 9/13/22 7370 Peltier Request for new 8x8 shed in Tabled yard a side 7/13/21 1313 Mound Request for 2 car garage on Approved/ Garage portion approved with Trail spot that previously had 1 Modified/ modified size/height car garage. Denied Covered patio portion denied Does not alter essential character of neighborhood - 8 similar structures as precedent; Aligned with neighboring garage; Neighbor support Î No opposition at hearing; Site of previous structure 9/1/20 1597 Peltier Concept review to modify Tabled Lake setback for new home build due to shape of lot. Homeowner advised to create official request. rd 9/1/20 1837 Î 73 Concept review to use Denied Street existing concrete slab from dog kennel for new shed which didnÓt meet setback requirements 9/1/20 1779 Concept review for shed Denied Partridge which wouldnÓt meet Place setbacks due to practical difficulties with backyard water flow 8/4/20 1840 Center Concept review for Tabled Street driveway expansion 11/12/19, 1687 Sorel Front yard fence to prevent Approved Issue not present when 9/3/19 dogs from entering yard homeowner purchased from City trail and property Î City built public trail endangering homeownerÓs after applicant moved to location dog Does not alter essential character of the neighborhood Î Other front yard fences on neighboring properties; small variation to fence height; no neighbor opposition 7/31/18, 1721 Concept review for fence in Denied Commission could not grant 7/10/18 Heritage the side yard when no rear variance as desired as would be Street yard in opposition to code. Commission understood plight and expressed interest in g code for future reviewin 7/10/18 1965 S. Variance to side yard Approved Does not alter essential Robin Lane setback for driveway. character of neighborhood Î Garage already approved for No residential neighbors rear of home and request for (adjacent to park). Neighboring minimum width driveway to properties have similar garage access. 52 and driveway configurations (precedent) 7/10/18 7112 Brian Concept review for shed to Tabled Discussion on reducing size or Drive be partially in applicantÓs changing placement side yard Commission explained rarity of granted variances nd 5/1/18 1926 Î 72 Concept review to widen Denied Commission consensus not to Street driveway to park boat set precedence. Did not meet practical difficulties requirement 10/4/16 7261 Main Deck on lake to encroach Denied Neighbors spoke in opposition setback by 5Ó-10Ó due to setting precedence. Commission found not a hardship and would set precedence 6/7/16 7198 Shad Concept to add onto home Denied Commission felt difficult to due to hardship of small grant variance as hardship dining room. didnÓt exist 4/5/16, 7261 Main Setback variance proposal in Approved Issue not present when 5/7/13 2013 and renewal in 2016. homeowner purchased property - Unique situation as Anoka County took portion of road Does not alter essential character of neighborhood Î Adjoining neighbor spoke in support of project. Other properties on Main Street found not to be affected. 11/2/16 1634 Concept to build screen Denied Hunters porch within setback Ridge Lane 6/2/16 1407 Mound Concept to extend porch on Tabled Commission indicated variance home to be built 4Ó into rear may not be supported yard setback. 9/10/13, 1588 Sorel Accessory structure in front Approved Does not alter essential 8/13/13 yard as rear yard on lake character of neighborhood Î Structure is storage shed in line with Code requirements for size. Structure is shielded from neighbor by line of tall evergreens (photo below). Neighbor spoke in support of project w/no opposition. 7/2/13, 7247 Main Accessory structure in front Approved Does not alter essential 5/7/13 yard as rear yard on lake. character of neighborhood Î Replacement of two existing Two neighbors spoke in support structures. as appearance of new structure would be improvement over the two existing buildings being replaced. No opposition. st 12/6/11 7055 Î 21 Request for kennel. Withdrawn Withdrawn before public hearing Avenue 12/14/10, 1540 Peltier Request for garage on Denied Issue not present when 11/9/10 existing slab. homeowner purchased 53 property - Anoka County purchased right of way and impacted driveway access, which was moved to a different street. Commission found insufficient reason to grant as homeowner not denied reasonable use of property. 9/1/09, 7267 Mill Variance request for metal Amendment Public hearing and research on 7/7/09 Road roof on front entryway to to Code metal roofs prevent ice dams Information presented on metal roofs and acceptable material quality Proposed amendment to code with no opposition. 9/2/08 7280 Twin Possible variance request to Denied Request didnÓt demonstrate Lakes enlarge existing garage ÐhardshipÑ encroaching on setback. Economic damage from no garage for truck is not hardship City could look into revising code rd 9/2/08, 7251 Variance request to add 3Withdrawn Homeowner bought house with 8/5/08 Clearwater garage stall requiring 3.5Ó situation as is = purchased with over easement to park car the ÐhardshipÑ which would look better Commission did not want to set inside. precedence. 9/4/07 1782 Peltier Fence in front yard Tabled Neighbor in favor Commission plan to review fence ordinance 7/3/07 1882 Center Garage to be built as Tabled property no longer on flood plain 3/14/07 7381 Old Set back variance Approved Applicant was asked how (City Mill Road with variance would comply with Council), conditions criteria outlined in MN Statutes 3/6/07, and City Code 154. 2/6/07, Relieve undue hardship, as 1/2/07 distinguished from mere inconvenience Not based on desire to increase value of land but correcting ÐextraordinaryÑ circumstances. Hardship caused by City ordinance Would not be detrimental or injurious to property in the neighborhood Structure meets permitted use 6/4/85 1397 Mound Variance to construct garage Approved Extraordinary circumstance Î Trl city owns portion of land between Mound Trail and property Commission reviewed to ensure project would not impact 54 neighboring property values, light, or air. No opposition from neighboring properties as noted in evaluation Additional Comments: 1/26/21 - Candidate inquired about the more challenging decisions of P&Z role. Chairperson response: "Variance requests are challenging because they do not always meet the requirements of the law and you have to say no, making the applicant unhappy." 4/4/06 - City Administrator Larson indicated swimming pools are accessory structures 6/6/06 - Commissioner Wood stated from a real estate perspective pools devalue property 55 This Handout was Received byResident Mound Trail front yard garages used as precedents supporting 1421 Mound Trailproject (P&Z 4/1/25 Agenda p.8) Mound Trail AddressDescriptionNotes 7185 (Lino Lakes)Basic 2 space garage-Dead end of street 1295Small 1space garage 13131 ½ -2 space garage-Approved in 2021 Variance: 7/13/2021 P&Z Minutes -Replacement of existing 1 car garage on same location -Does not alter character of locality (faces existing garage and in line with size of home) -Support of both direct neighbors -Size and height of garage adjusted from original plan by commission. -Proposal for covered patio as part of project was denied. 13212 space garage-Faces 1313 Mound Trail garage 1393Small 1 space garage 1397Basic garage-Approved in 1985 Variance: 6/4/1985 P&Z Public Hearing Minutes -Basic garage set back and not visible from street -Commission reviewed to ensure project would not impact neighboring property values, light, or air. 14053 space garage-Located very close to home and appears attached. -Not visible from the street. These structures are not similarto the 1421 Mound Trail variance request: All 7 are garages The footprint of each garage is significantly smaller Garages are adjacent to each other rather than to the 56 There are no wet bars, full bathrooms, pool houses, recreational centers, golf simulators, two stories. with stairs, or front yard covered entertainment patios. Covered patio expressly denied in 2021 variance request. The 7 precedent garages could not reasonably be used as dwellings. There are no front yard fences on Mound Trail. The 1421 Mound project would require a 4-foot fence in a front yard, also outside of Zoning Code. 6 of 7 garages were built decades ago, andthe Commission considered location of structure, character of locality, and impact to neighboring properties before approval. 2021 variance had size and height of garage reduced by Commission 57 CITY OF CENTERVILLEREQUEST FOR ACTION Agenda Item # Department: RequestedMeetingDate: May 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning VII.1 TITLE OF ISSUE: Variance Request - Dreamscape/Alex's (Sign) BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: A public hearing was be held at the May 6, 2025 Planning & Zoning Commission to receive public input on a sign variance for Dreamscape/Alex's. The staff recommendation is to grant the variance with the conditions as outlined in the staff memo. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: N/A REQUESTED ACTION: Motion to approve the variance with the conditions as outlined in the staff memo. For ClerkÓs Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: ____________________________________ Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: ____________________________________ Vote Record: Aye Nay Other (specify) ____________ ______________________________________________________________ _____ _______________________________________________________________ Refer to: _________________________________ Tabled Until: ______________________________ Consent Other: ___________________________________ Regular 58 CITY OF CENTERVILLEREQUEST FOR ACTION Agenda Item # Department: RequestedMeetingDate: May 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning VII.2 TITLE OF ISSUE: Variance Request - 1421 Mound Trail (Accessory Structure/Garage/pool house) BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: A public hearing was be held at the May 6, 2025 Planning & Zoning Commission to receive public input on a variance for an accessory (garage/pool house) at 1421 Mound Trail. The staff recommendation is to grant the variance with the findings of fact as outlined in the staff memo. COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: N/A REQUESTED ACTION: Motion to approve the variance with the findings of fact as outlined in the staff memo. For ClerkÓs Use: SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Motion By: ____________________________________ Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map Second By: ____________________________________ Vote Record: Aye Nay Other (specify) ____________ ______________________________________________________________ _____ _______________________________________________________________ Refer to: _________________________________ Tabled Until: ______________________________ Consent Other: ___________________________________ Regular 59 60 CITY OF CENTERVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was held in Council Chambers on Tuesday, April 1, 2025, at 6:30 p.m. MEETING Î 6:30 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 6:30p.m. 1. Roll Call Present: Commissioner Olson Not Approved Commissioner Richard Nelson Chair Dawn Kalina Commissioner Jeannie Seppala Commissioner Jim Carciofini Jon Krueger Absent: Commissioner Bruce Thompson Staff: Interim City Administrator, Athanasia Lewis Consulting City Planner, Phil Carlson Council Council Member David Kubat II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. Motion by Commissioner Seppala, seconded by Commissioner Olson to Approve the Agenda. All in favor. Motion carried. IV. PUBLIC HEARING (6:30 PM or shortly thereafter) 1. None V. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, APPEARANES 1.Variance Review Î 1421 Mound Trail (Garage & Pool) Planning Consultant Phil Carlson introduced this item as presented in his memo, noting that this is an informal review for a variance request for a garage and pool. Discussion ensued about the location of the proposed accessory structures, definitions of yard, required yard, rear yard, setbacks, and the intent of the City Code relative to placement of accessory structures. Discussion also ensued about common law in Minnesota on the lakeshore, with the lake being the front yard and the yard facing the road being the rear yard. Phil noted that there is no question that over the years the interpretation has been different than his, noting that the Council ultimately determines whether a variance is granted. Page 1 of 3 61 City of Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission April 1, 2025 The resident reviewed his request with the Commission and answered questions. A neighbor of the residentÓs was in attendance and expressed opposition to Mr. HeronÓs request, noting that the building height of the proposed garage would impact visibility from specific windows in her home. The Commission expressed non-binding support (informal review only) for the garage/pool house as long is it meets height and size requirements; there was less support for the pool due to the CommissionÓs interpretation of Ðfront yard.Ñ The resident intends to submit variances for the garage/pool house and the pool. The Commission requested that the City Code be revised to provide clearer definitions of yard, front yard, frontage, etc., and that the intent of the Code reflects that pools should be restricted to the rear yard. 2. Downtown Master Plan Guidelines a. Parking Guidelines Planning Consultant Phil Carlson introduced this item as presented. Discussion ensued about the number of parking spaces that are recommended downtown, and why the item was referred to the Commission for further consideration. Interim Administrator Lewis noted that the Council requested that Phil review the parking guidelines to ensure consistency with the City Code. Discussion ensued and the Commission agreed to recommend 2 parking spaces per residential unit in the Downtown Master Plan, which is what is outlined in the City Code, and to change the term bedroom to unit. Motion by Commissioner Olson, seconded by Commissioner Nelson to recommend to Council two parking spaces per residential unit in the Downtown Master Plan and to change the term bedroom to unit. All in favor. Motion carried. b. Density Requirements Î M-2 Planning Consultant Phil Carlson introduced this item as presented. Discussion ensued about density requirements, and why the item was referred to the Commission. Interim Administrator Statz noted that the Council requested that Phil review the requirements against industry standards. Discussion ensued and there was consensus among the Commission to recommend to Council 12-30 units/acre in the M-2 District (the density in place before the LaLonde proposal). Motion by Commissioner Carciofini, seconded by Commissioner Seppala to recommend to Council 12-30 acres/unit in the M-2 district. All in favor. Motion carried VI. OLD BUSINESS 1. None VII. NEW BUSINESS 1. None VIII. APPROVAL OF MIN UTES 1.March 4, 2025, 2025, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Interim Administrator Lewis introduced this item as presented. Motion by Commissioner Seppala, seconded by Commissioner Olson to approve the March 4, 2025, Planning and Zoning Commission minutes. Commissioner Krueger abstained Commissioner Olson, Commissioner Nelson, Commissioner Kalina, Commissioner Seppala, Commissioner Carciofini in favor. Motion carried. Page 2 of 3 62 City of Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission April 1, 2025 IX. ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES 1. Council Member Liaison Council member Kubat is filling in for Council Member Koski. Council member Kubat suggested that when things slow down that we review the informal variance request process because itÓs like a double review of issues. Council member Kubat thanked the Commission for their hard work. 2. AdministratorÓs Report Interim City Administrator Lewis reviewed the report as presented in the packet. X. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Seppala, seconded by Commissioner Carciofini to adjourn the meeting at 8:33 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried. Page 3 of 3 63 64 AdministratorÓs Report April 23, 2025 ADMINISTRATION Recognition Finance Director Bruce DeJong has been appointed to the Metro Inet Long Range Financial Planning Subcommittee. This committee is tasked with establishing long-term fiscal sustainability, which will add tremendous value to our own cityÓs fiscal stability. Congratulations Bruce! PARKS & RECREATION Parks & Recreation Projects Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park Play Structure Equipment The Parks & Rec. Committee has forwarded questions to their preferred RFP vendor and requested sample fall zone and ADA Accessibility materials. Information will be provided at the Committee meeting on May 7th. Fiore Tree Update The Committee has received all quotes for available installation, watering, electricity, etc. Two donors have been lined up and Chair Errickson-Grahek and staff continues to research grant possibilities. Stay tuned. 2025 Main Street Market Main Street Market will take place every Thursday at 5:30p.m. from thst July 17-August 21. The location: 1721 Westview Street, Centerville, next to Centerville Elementary parking lot. Registration is now open for vendors, click here: https://rb.gy/1yxx6z CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Accepting Applications The Centennial Fire District is currently hiring for Paid On- Call positions. If you are interested in becoming a Centennial Fire District Firefighter/EMT, please visit the CFD webpage for more information: JOIN US | Centennial Fire ItÓs that time of year where the Centennial Fire District is receiving calls about grass fires. Please be cautious when burning outdoors, as it is very dry. 65 th The Fire Steering Committee met on April 17 and presented two Life Saving Awards for a high-risk rescue on Centerville th Lake on March 14. Thank you to the firefighters who responded to this call! Firefighters Adam Montain (left) and Bryce Wasiloski (middle) are shown in the photo to the left with Chief Dan Retka (right). CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE E-Bikes Keep an eye out for our officers utilizing our new department e-bikes. Be sure to stop and check them out. The Centennial Lakes Police DepartmentÓs new E-Bikes help officers connect with the community and assist those in need. With easier access to parks and trails, officers are more approachable, fostering trust and building stronger relationships Î one ride at a time. Visit this like to learn more: https://www.facebook.com/NorthMetroTV/videos/962505538972784 Officer BJ Stepan to the right. PUBLIC WORKS Hiring Seasonal P.W. Technicians Now Hiring If you are 18 years of age or older and interested in earning $16.80/hour, check out the link for an application packet: https://www.centervillemn.com/documentcenter/view/1202/2025- seasonal-maintenance-tech-packet or stop by City Hall for a packet. Meeting and City Hall Schedule April 23, 2025, 5:00 & 6:30 p.m. Î City Council Work Session & Council Meeting (Local Board of Appeal) April 26, 2025, 8:00 a.m. Î 12:00 p.m. Î City Council Work Session, Strategic Planning - **CANCELLED** May 6, 2025, 6:30 p.m. Î Planning & Zoning Commission (P.H. Chapter 156 & Table of Allowed Uses and Variance Request, Shuda Properties, LLC/dba Dreamscapes Î Setback for Pylon Sign, and Variance Request, 1421 Mound Trail Î Construction of Accessory Structure in Front Yard, Height & Size May 7, 2025, 6:30 p.m. Î Parks & Recreation Committee May 14, 2025, 6:30 p.m. Î City Council May 21, 2025 Î EDA May 28, 2025, 5:00 & 6:30 p.m. Î City Council Work Session & Council Meeting 66 CENTERVILLE CARES Anoka County Î Homeowner/Homebuyer Programs The home rehabilitation loan programs help income-qualified residents with health, safety, accessibility and some energy concerns on their primary home. It provides deferred, zero interest loan financing. No reverse mortgages are accepted. Learn more here. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Economic Development Authority (EDA) th At the April 17 EDA meeting, Lloyd Drilling was sworn into office filling the board vacancy. Welcome to the EDA Lloyd! Calendar of Events: April 23, 2025, Centennial Area Social Network Î 5:00pm-7:00pm Î Red Ginger Chia Bistrol May 15, 2025, Ageing Well Senior Expo Î 9am-12:00, St. GenevieveÓs Community Parish Center, 6995 Centerville Road May 15, 2025, Lunch & Learn Î 11:30am-1pm Î Renstrom Dental Lab Anoka County Regional Economic Development (ACRED) ACRED will hold their annual Economic & th Workforce Development Summit on May 7 from 9:00AM-12:00Pm at the Bunker Hills Event Center in Coon Rapids. The event features an educational component, as well as networking opportunities. This is an excellent event, and reservations are going fast. The event is free. If you would like to attend, please scan the QR code on the flyer to register. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 67 Development Inquiries None Planning & Zoning th At the May 6 P&Z meeting, the Commission will hold a public hearing on Zoning Ordinance revisions and review a couple of variance applications. The meeting starts at 6:30p.m. and the public is welcome to attend. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT (March 2025) Website 2,3 users 2.2k new 5.3k page views Website (Featured News) Spring Road Weight Restrictions Upcoming Public Hearings Î P & Z Annual Street Street Sweeping rd Annual Garage Sale Day Registration 33 Inflow & Infiltration Program Local Board of Appeal & Equalization Fete des Lacs Parade Registration is Open Beyond the Yellow Ribbon Hiring Seasonal P.W. Tech. Main Street Market Registration Anoka County Law Day Smart Irrigation Controller Rebate Follow Us on Social Media Stay Connected 68 69 Reader Board (11,000+ cars/day) Meeting Schedules Park Clean Î Volunteers Needed Hiring Seasonal P.W. Technician Social Media (571 X; 935 FB Followers) (797 Post Reach) City Accounts o 3/28 P & R Agenda/Packet Link (34/176) o 3/28 P & Z Agenda/Packet Link (37/161) o 3/28 Fete des Lacs Parade Registration (20/79) o 3/28 Shared Beyond the Yellow Ribbon NE Metro (18/74) o 3/21 City Council Agenda/Packet Link (28/264) o 3/18 Anoka County Law Day o 3/14 EDA Agenda/Packet Link (34/181) o 3/7 City Council Agenda/Packet Link (29/276) o 3/5 Blizzard Wizard at Work (59/379) o 3/3 Snowplow Naming Contest Winner - Blizzard Wizard (59/453) o 3/3 Recycle Technologies Events & Coupons (43/453) Community Email List (301 email addresses) Upcoming Meeting Agendas, Admin. Report, Newsletter, Registrations Open & Upcoming Events Business Email List Promote local businesses via promotional swag at summer events Google Business Profile 146 profile views 73 people asked for directions 24 calls 49 website visits Informational Kiosk Î Cornerstone Park Sign up to Receive Text Messages and/or to be Added to the CityÓs E-Blast 70 Receive text messages about upcoming events on the city calendar and the parks calendar. From the CityÓs Website Click on the ÐNotify MeÑ icon to receive texts messages with information about upcoming events on the city calendar and the parks calendar. Click here to be taken directly to this page. Sign up to be added to the cityÓs e-blast list to receive meeting agendas, meeting packets, newsletters, the AdministratorÓs Report, and other pertinent information via email. Click here to sign up via a Google Doc form. Once your information is submitted, your email will be added to our email distribution list. Click here to be taken to the ÐStay ConnectedÑ page where you can then create an account and complete the Google Docs form. Staff Training Public Works Technicians Alex Barmettler, James Huisenga, and Caleb Molitor attended the annual Minnesota cities stormwater coalition (MCSC) meeting on April 16, 2025. 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81