The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2006-10-11 CC ervi{{e CITY COUNCIL & WORK SESSION MEETING Wednesday, October 11,2006 6:30 p.m. 'Estaf,[isfietf 1857 COUNCIL MEETING I. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call D. PUBLIC HEARINGS ID. APPROVALOFAGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES 1. September 27,2006 City Council Meeting Minutes (Pages 1 - 6) V. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City of Centerville September 28, 2006 through October 4, 2006 Claims (Page 7) 2. Change Order - 21st A venue/Backage Road (Pages 8 - 9) 3. Authorize Staff and Council Members to Attend League of Cities Regional Meeting in St. Paul. (fee $35 per person) (Page 10) VI. A W ARDSIPRESENTA TIONS/APPEARANCES VD. OLD BUSINESS VDI. NEW BUSINESS 1. Proposed Ordinance #XX, Second Series - Amending Chapter 111 of the Centerville Code Insurance Requirements (Page 11) 2. Proposed Ordinance #XX, Second Series - Amending Chapter 93 of the Centerville Code by Amending Section 93.01 Relating to Maintenance of Sidewalks (Pages 12 - 13) 3. Proposed Ordinance #XX, Second Series - Amending Chapter 93 of the Centerville Code by Inserting Section 93.04 Relating to Adjoining Right of Way (Page 14) 4. Acceptance of Resignation - Mr. Jeff Banzai from Planning & Zoning Commission (Page 15) 5. Purchase of a New 6 Mega Pixel Digital Camera 6. Paving Public Works Entrance Area (Pages 16 -19) IX. ANNOUNCEMENTSIUPDA TES 1. City Administrator, Mr. Dallas Larson 2. CSAB14 (Update) 3. Downtown Redevelopment 4. Centerville Sesquicentennial x. ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL WORK SESSION L CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call IT. DISCUSSION ITEM 1. Anoka County Response to the City's Comments Regarding the Memorandum of Understanding m. ADJOURNMENT * * REi\,il1NDERS * * City Council Meeting October ,200(, () 30 pm Council Chambers EDA Public Hearing Park and Recreation Committee Meeting NCHcmber L 2U06 (, 'H) p.1l1 Cound Chambers GENERAL ELECTION - November 7, ,~006 7.00 a m. to 800 p.In SL Gcne\ieve's Parish C\l1nmunit\ Center City Council Meeting ..... November 8, 2006 6.30 P m Council Chambers Delinquent Utilities/Garbage Public Hearing Westview Special Assessments Public Hearing Hunters Crossing, 3rd Addition Special Assessments Public Hearing 7111 Brian Drive Special Assessment Public Hearing (Grass Cutting) Consideration of2007 Liquor/Tobacco Licenses (Deadline to receive paperwork from establishments at City Hall November 3,2006) Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting- November 14,2006 - 630 pm. Council ChambcT~; CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 27, 2006 6:30 p.m. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on September 27,2006, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: STAFF: Mayor Mary Capra Council Member Tom Lee Council Member leffPaar Council Member Richard Terway t' :::Cil Member Michelle Lakso NOll City Engineer Statz City Administrator Larson .... ............. .... ......... . ............ ..... ... .. ........ d' . ... ... ". d' .. .. .. 'u d' . ... ..... .", ..... .. .., ... ... "..... . .....,:,::,:!"ii?::iQ, :.,' p..."...'.'..... :'.,.,.:"'::/:. '.:... , >,"'" ... ..,.,...,...,...... ...:.:."...",0...... ....... ...... :!n!:iniQi :i,,!"" .i.... ...d.. ......... . ................. .......,...... " .......... d."... . ........... ...d,.. . ......u..u udo.. . ............... .......... . ..... .... .... .. .. .... ... .. . ... ... . . ..."" ..... ..." . . , . , - . . . . . . . . ... '.. '"' .. ...., ..... ABSENT: I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Capra called the September 27,2006, City Council meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. III. SET AGENDA Council Added: Fairview Avenue, Center Street Trail, and extend prepayment for Westview. Council removed the closed executive session. Motion by Council Member Paar. seconded by Council Member Lee to approve the Al!enda as amended. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. IV. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES 1. September 13,2006 City Council Meeting Minutes Motion bv Council Member Lakso. seconded by Council Member Terway. to approve the September 13. 2006 City Council meetinl! minutes as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 2. September 13,2006 City Council Closed Session Meeting Minutes / City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes September 27, 2006 Motion by Council Member Lakso. seconded by Council Member Terwav to approve the September 13. 2006 City Council Closed Session meetine: minutes as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimous Iv. V. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City ofCenterville September 14,2006 through September 27,2006 Claims 2. Centennial Fire District Claims through September 30,2006 3. Centennial Lakes Police Department Claims through September 14,2006 4. Interstate Power Systems Proposal for Generator Inspection - Not to Exceed $650 Motion by Council Member Lee. seconded bv Council Member Paar. to approve the Consent Ae:enda as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. VI. A W ARDS/PRESENTATIONS/APPEARANCES None. VII. OLD BUSINESS 1. Bonestroo Recommendation to Delay Pavement, Curb & Gutter Until 2007 - Backage Road & 21 st Avenue Utility & Street Improvement City Engineer Statz provided an update on the recommendation regarding the paving of 21 st Avenue Backage Road. The Contractor has asked for permission to delay bituminous paving and concrete curb and gutter as they are having issues meeting densities in compaction because the soils are really wet and time is needed to allow it to sit through a freeze thaw cycle. The recommendation is for a gravel access on 21 st Avenue to allow for access to Sheehy and the lift station. City Engineer Statz indicated that the proposal is to do the paving and concrete curbing in June 2007 and have the backage road closed until then. City Administrator Larson suggested a change order increasing the time allowed for completion of the project. Council Member Lee indicated that he would like a date certain for the paving to be completed. Council asked for a withholding of funds until the work is done. Council Member Terway asked that the contractor pay for the barriers to close the road. City Engineer Statz will inform the contractor of that requirement. Page 2 of6 c2 City of CenterviIle Council Meeting Minutes September 27,2006 Motion bv Council Member Terwav. seconded bv Council Member Lakso to Authorize Preparation of a Chane:e Order to Extend the Terms of the Proiect to be completed bv June 30. 2007. All in favor. Motion carried unanimous Iv. 2. Approval of Grant Agreement & Authorization of Closing on Land Purchase - St. Paul Regional Water Services City Administrator Larson clarified that the property must be used for public park open space for the portion that the grant covers. The property cannot be sold for housing or another purpose in the future. Mayor Capra indicated that the grant allows the City to pay this property off without any financing. Motion bv Council Member Lakso. seconded bv Council Member Lee. to approve the Grant Ae;reement & Authorization of Closine: on Land Purchase - St. Paul Ree:ional Water Services. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Fairview Avenue City Administrator Larson explained that the property owners adjoining Fairview Avenue have asked whether the City could add that street to the backage road project and that was not an option at the time because Old Mill Road was being considered. He then said that due to that dropping off and the timing of this project being changed Fairview could again be considered and the amount would be approximately $260,000. The property owners would like to do an expedited process and have it specially assessed to them. City Administrator Larson indicated that the frontage runs past Ebensteiner and Rehbein and it will be assessed approximately 60% to Rehbein and 40% to Ebensteiner with no cost to the City. Council agreed to add Fairview to the project provided the property owners will agree. Motion bv Council Member Lee. seconded bv Council Member Terwav. authorizine: Staff to Prepare Assessment Ae:reement. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. VIII. NEW BUSINESS 1. Mountain Enterprises, Inc., Request for 2:00 a.m. Closing Renewal Mayor Capra indicated that she would like to arrange the renewals to run with the license renewals. Staff will look into that to ensure compliance and ease in keeping track of the situation. Council Member Paar suggested one date that all renewals are due. Page 3 of6 3 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes September 27, 2006 City Administrator Larson indicated that the insurance should run concurrent with the license year to eliminate the need to deal with this every few months. Council would like to discuss this with the business owner at license renewal time. Motion by Council Member Paar, seconded by Council Member Lee, to approve renewal of the 2:00 a.m. closine: for Mountain Enterprises, Inc., dba Trio Inn. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Capra asked Staff to look at the ordinance to see if it can be amended to assist Staff with enforcement of these types of issues and notify Centennial Police of the . . msurance Issue. 2. Resolution #06-045 - Expressing Support & Congratulations to the Town of Columbus Mayor Capra noted that Columbus Township has incorporated to become a City. Motion by Council Member Terway, seconded by Council Member Paar, to approve Resolution #06-045 - Expressine: Support & Cone:ratulations to the Town of Columbus. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Center Street City Administrator Larson indicated that the City is in the process of building a trail through Outlot E of Pheasant Marsh Third Addition and the trail stops short of Center Street. Staff has found that there is an outlot that the State of Minnesota owns due to tax forfeit and there is an easement across it, however the easement doesn't provided for a trail. He then suggested that the City should acquire the property to allow for the trail to cross it and connect with Center Street. He further indicated that there is an adjoining property owner that has extended a fence over to a portion of it and he could claim that he owns the property now by adverse possession. Council Member Lee indicated he would like to have City Attorney Glaser look into having the fence removed to allow room for the trail. City Administrator Larson suggested pursuing a restricted deed and then work out getting the unrestricted deed and work out the specifics with the adjoining property owner. Motion by Council Member Lakso, seconded by Council Member Terway, to approve aCQuirine: the parcel. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Council Member Terway asked for legal interpretation of the unrestricted and restricted deed and ability to look into the adverse possession situation. 4. Extend Prepayment for Westview Page 4 of6 4 City of CenterviIle Council Meeting Minutes September 27,2006 City Administrator Larson explained that in the agreement the property owners have until November 1, 2006, to prepay without interest but it took an extra month to get the project going and the property owners have asked to extend prepayment to December 1,2006. Motion by Council Member Lee. seconded by Council Member Lakso. to approve an extension to prepay to December 1. 2006. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. IX. ANNOUNCEMENTSIUPDATES 1. City Administrator, Mr. Dallas Larson City Administrator Larson reported that the County is considering bump outs at Centerville Road. He also reported that Staff is still waiting for comment on the MOD submitted by the City. City Administrator Larson explained that the demo of buildings in Block 7 will begin as soon as the response is received from the PCA. He also indicated that the City has asked to use a garage for the squads and Staff will continue to negotiate that arrangement with the County. City Administrator Larson indicated that he received a call from Ronnie Burque and he would like to purchase the Studebaker fire truck as his grandfather was Mayor at the time the fire truck was purchased. Council asked Staff to work with him regarding a purchase agreement. 2. CSAH 14 (Update) Nothing further. 3. Downtown Redevelopment City Administrator Larson indicated that the East Block 7 project has a spend down requirement by the end of the year and the City is a little behind where they should have been on that and Staff will work on getting the funds spent down. Staff is also looking at using remaining funds to buy the parcel next to the land that the City owns to build the pond. Mayor Capra asked if the City can apply for the funds not spent this year. City Administrator Larson indicated it may be possible. Motion bv Council Member Lee. seconded by Council Member Terway. to authorize securine: proposals for construction of utilities to serve Block 7 and to look Page 5 of6 5 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes September 27,2006 at purchasine: adioinine: property for runoff holdine: pond. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Centerville Sesquicentennial Mayor Capra informed Council that Mr. & Mrs. L' Allier would be servmg on the Committee and invited anyone else interested to contact her. Council Member Paar asked about fireworks for Fete des Lacs next summer because of the sesquicentennial and asked whether the City can increase the funds to do more. Mayor Capra indicated that Council put $5,000 toward the sesquicentennial and Council can revisit the issue if desired. x. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Council Member Lakso. seconded by Council Member Paar to adiourn the September 27. 2006 City Council Meetine: at 7:18 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed by: Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Page 60f6 to CITY OF CENTERVILLE 10/04/06 9:00 AM Page 1 'E<talifi.41<'d: lB.:;? *Check Summary Register@ Name 10100 MAIN STREET BANK Paid Chk# 021737 AFLAC Paid Chk# 021738 AVLlC Paid Chk# 021739 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE Paid Chk# 021740 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES Paid Chk# 021741 DAVE KICHLER INSPECTIONS, Paid Chk# 021742 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS Paid Chk# 021743 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Paid Chk# 021744 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Paid Chk# 021745 MMUA Paid Chk# 021746 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT Paid Chk# 021747 NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE Paid Chk# 021748 ON SITE SANITATION Paid Chk# 021749 PALZER, PAUL Paid Chk# 021750 PERA Paid Chk# 021751 PRESS PUBLICATIONS Paid Chk# 021752 TIME SAVER Check Date OCTOBER 2006 Check Amt 10/11/2006 10/11/2006 10/11/2006 10/11/2006 10/11/2006 10/11/2006 10/11/2006 10/11/2006 10/11/2006 10/11/2006 10/11/2006 10/11/2006 10/11/2006 10/11/2006 10/11/2006 10/11/2006 Total Checks $129.22 ACCIDENTAL VOL INS. - AFLAC $624.07 DEF COMP 10-5-06 $35,217.58 OCTOBER POLICE SERVICES $3,307.13 POLICE BLDG DEBT SERVICE - OCT $2,609.20 ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS $77.71 BUILDING PERMITS $20.00 ANNUAL DUES FOR MN MAYORS ASSO $1,534.50 SEPTEMBER 2006 SAC CHARGES $1,375.00 4TH QTR 2006 SAFETY COMPLIANCE $356.38 DEF COMP W/H 10-5-06 $32.00 T BENDER & J MEYER LIFE INS $971.92 6970 LAMOTTE DR - LAMOTTE PARK $561.94 REIMBURSEMENT FOR AM WATER WOR $2,296.03 PERA W/H 10-5-06 $104.75 ORD #152 AMEND. 81657 $144.00 9-13-06 CITY COUNCIL MEETING $49,361.43 Note: There will be an updated list of disbursements for approval on 10-11-06. 7 .11. Bonestroo .... Rosene . R AnderJik& '\11 Associates engineers" Archlrecu Owner: CilV ofCcnlcnille. ISIlO Main St., Ccnlt.'t'Villc, MN 550311 Date October 6, 2006 Contrlll:lor: BUTschvillc COllstlllclioll. Inc., 114./011111 St Nfl, P. O. Box 65, HUnlwcr, MN 55341 BUild CUIl1Puny; Weslern SurelYConlllanv, P. O. Bul' 1068, Houston, IX 77:!51 Bond No: 929 3979% I CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 BACKAGE ROAD AND 21 ST AVENUE UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS BRA FILE NO 000616w05143-0 Description of' Work This Change Order extends the subslantial completion date for concrete curb and gutter and the bituminous b:lse course only to June 30,2007 The contractor shall, at no lIdditional cost., provide necessmy tranic control devices to keep the Backage Road closed over the winter months 21st Ave must remain open and drivellble during the winter mont.hs to provide access to the Sheehy property illld the Lift Station in Lino Lakes This change order does not affect the overall completion date for the project, nor does it alfect the contmet price (,H,".II.lJCI-IOJ ,xl, 2 Origimll Contract Amount Previous Change Orders This Change Order Revised Contract Amount (including this change order) $1,118,25190 $13,103 16 $0.00 $1,131,35506 CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES Original Contract Times: Subst~mlial Completion (days or date): Ready for final Payment (days or date): June 30, 2007 for concrete curb and guller and the bituminous base course only Increase ofthis Change Order: Substantial Completion (days or date): Ready for final Payment (days or date): Contract Time with all approved Change Orders: Substantial Completion (days Of date); Ready for final Payment (days or date): Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLlK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Date: Approved by Contractor: BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION, INC. Approved by Owner: CITY OF CENTERVILLE Date Dale CL llwncr ( '\lIltrJclOI' Il\mding COlllpill1Y Illlnl.'Slroo & A~$OC 1"1,1151...":1-10.1 "Is 9 City staff and councilme1nbers: REGISTER ONLINE AFTER AUG. 18 FOR THE CLOSEST MEETING TO YOUR CITY LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES DATES & LOCATIONS Benson Oct. 3 Ottertail Oct. 4 Newfolden Oct. 5 Heron Lake Oct. 24 St. Peter Oct. 25 St. Charles Oct. 26 METRO MEETING St. Paul Nov. 16 WE'RE COMING TO YOUR BACKYARDI Join the League to discuss timely, important issues affecting cities. Meet your neighbors to share city stories and learn from one another. Explore workforce development-one of many topics of interest-to make sureY9urcity has the in theJuture. Learn how to continuity and.... state c/\ Preview the about2006 h~lpshape ~Q07 lO CITY OF CENTERVILLE ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE#-, SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 111 OF THE CENTERVILLE CITY CODE BY AMENDING INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS THE CITY OF CENTER~LE ORDAINS: Section 1. Code Section 111.10 (E) shall be amended to read as follows: (E) INSURANCE CERTIFICATE REQUIREMENTS. Whenever an insurance certificate is required by this Chapter the applicant shall file with the City Clerk a certificate of insurance showing (1) that the limits are at least as high as required, (2) that coverage is effective for at least the license term approved, and (3) that such insurance will not be canceled or terminated without thirty days' written notice served upon the City Clerk. Cancellation or termination of such coverage shall be grounds for license revocation. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this _ day of Council of the City of Centerville. , 2006 by the City CITY OF CENTERVILLE BY: Mary Capra, Mayor ATTEST: Teresa Bender, City Clerk 1 I I CITY OF CENTERVILLE ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE # SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 93 OF THE CENTERVILLE CITY CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 93.01 RELATING TO MAINTENANCE OF SIDEWALKS THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE ORDAINS: Section 1. Code Section 93.01 shall be amended by inserting the following as section (C) the following: (C) SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR. (1) Primary Responsibility. It is the primary responsibility of the owner of property upon which there is abutting any sidewalk to keep and maintain such sidewalk in safe and serviceable condition. (2) Construction, Reconstruction and Repair Specifications. All construction, reconstruction or repair of sidewalks shall be done in strict accordance with specifications on file in the office of the Public Works Director. (3) Notice - No Emergency. Where, in the opinion of the Public Works Director, no emergency exists, notice of the required repair or reconstruction shall be given to the owner of the abutting property. Such notice shall require completion of the work within ninety days, and shall be mailed to the owner or owners shown to be such on the records of the County Officer who mails tax statements. (4) Notice - Emergency. Where, in the opinion of the Public Works Director, an emergency exists, notice of the required repair or reconstruction shall be given to the owner of the abutting property. Such notice shall require completion of the work within ten days, and shall be mailed to the owner or owners shown to be such on the records of the County Officer who mails tax statements. (5) Failure of Owner to Reconstruct or Make Repairs. If the owner of the abutting property fails to make repairs or accomplish reconstruction as herein required, the Clerk shall report such failure to the Council and the Council may order such work to be done under its direction and the cost thereof assessed to the abutting property owner as any other special assessment. (6) Duty to Inspect. In order to accomplish the purpose of this Section, it shall be the duty of the Public Works Director to inspect sidewalks within the City, or cause the same to be inspected under his/her direction. Section 2. The existing section 93.01 (C) shall be relabeled as (D). /~ Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this _ day of Council of the City of Centerville. , 2006 by the City CITY OF CENTERVILLE BY: Mary Capra, Mayor ATTEST: Teresa Bender, City Clerk G CITY OF CENTERVILLE ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE # SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 93 OF THE CENTERVILLE CITY CODE BY INSERTING SECTION 93.04 RELATING TO ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY. THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE ORDAINS: Section 1. Code Section 93 shall be amended by inserting section 93.04 as follows: 93.04 MAINTENANCE OF ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY. (A) Duty of Property Owners to Cut Grass and Weeds and Maintain Trees and Shrubs. Every owner of property abutting on any street shall cause the grass and weeds to be cut from the line of such property nearest to such street to the center of such street. If the grass or weeds in such a place attain a height in excess of eight (8) inches it shall be prima facie evidence of a failure to comply with this Section. Every owner of property abutting on any street shall, subject to the provisions herein requiring a permit therefor, trim, cut and otherwise maintain all trees and shrubs in unhazardous and healthy condition, from the line of such property nearest to such street to the center thereof. (B) Failure of Owner. If the owner of the abutting property fails to maintain adjoining right of way as required by this section, the city may secure compliance in the same manner as abatement of nuisance violations and may order such work to be done under its direction and the cost thereof assessed to the abutting property owner as any other special assessment. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this _ day of Council of the City of Centerville. , 2006 by the City CITY OF CENTERVILLE BY: Mary Capra, Mayor ATTEST: Teresa Bender, City Clerk /y City of Centerville, It is with my deepest regrets that I must resign form the Planning and Zoning Commission effective immediately following October 3rds meeting due to family obligations. ~!; /~ MEMO 3 October 2006 To: Dallas Larson, City Administrator From: Paul Palzer, Public Works DirectorlBuilding Officia~ Re: Paving Public Works entrance area +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ I have received two quotes to pave a portion of the public works entrance and parking area and garage door access areas. The work consists of removing the old asphalt and concrete pads, lowering the catch basins and grading the area to provide for positive drainage. Install 3" of compact asphalt over a total area of 7400 square feet. I recommend the Council accept the quote from Arcade Asphalt for the amount of $13,500.00. J(p A~A~, 9.e. 6433 20th Ave. So. · Lino Lakes, MN 55038. (651) 429-7005 MATT VESEL Black Topping · Resurfacing · Patching · Bob Cat Grading Crushed Rock · Snow Plowing & Removal Work to ~ performed at \\;W, l W 0<<\) Name ~\r dbl..... S',." 3 Address <S l+~~ dO fY' 5'1 ~ .Ldq_vr;'d-" 9'. Telephone ('1'-2--- 1 r.~" OI.:J_ City We hereby propose to complete the job to the satisfaction of our customers. All material is guaranteed. Our price includes all excavating, grading, gravel and blacktop. It includes only the finest quality materials; Limerock [Dolomite) for base, and blacktop which meets Highway Specifications of 2341 or 2331 Wear, Hot AC 5%-6% oil with 112"-3/4" rock used in the blacktop. This product will be used unless stated above. 5 YEAR GUARANTEE ON WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS. DUE TO THE EXTREME TEMPERATURE CHANGES IN MINNESOTA, WE CAN NOT GUARANTEE AGAINST FRCET CRACKS. Area to be blacktopped, graveled, excavated- Total square feet: Inches of gravel: 2 3 4 5 6 or as needed Inches of blacktop after compaction: 1 2 3 Complete price for above work: $ Full payment to be made on completion of work, unless other arrangements have been made. Prices are subject to change after 60 days. ::::~~: M~W Date 1 {J~ + \OIG~J , Special Instructions: A~V\J '7400 (J Fi ~~M+ ~,\~ Jtl G~l'vJ{ ~ ~ I~ /\/eRJ(?~~ '\~'- n\,0.J.C" fl q' ') ~ ' . d L ,,,~ ~(j >\ -J 0 'j ,{*A- ~A'jt\~ ll/~SSO --/ ' ~ Jl MUELLNER BLACKTOP INC. Parking lots Driveways Patch work Seal Coating Snow Plowing & Removal 7007 20TH AVENUE SOUTH CENTERVILLE, MN 55038 (651) 482-0731 · FAX: (651]'426-4500 S~5 DATE I{)"-d--{)~ MAP :~::E~7;~~b- CITY . ?~~~ ZIP . . ,,~~ .\~~ . ~ll ~/. . . n ""~:'i,t''''''' P ",~Y'. . . '~ '7A11<; ~: HOME PHONE Approx. sq. ft. Homeowner to provide permit 0 Yes 0 No o Asphalt --3 Inches Compacted o Overlay Existing Asphalt o Overlay Existing Concrete o Remove One Layer Asphalt o Remove One Layer Concrete __ o Use Your Base and Add to Establish ~ Inches o Dig Out, if necessary, and Add -S- Inches Base WORK PHONE j,.. () vV'Tfl, "OM/IV ~ oIi.Aijv~rc' NO~fft~ JOB QUOTE $ CITY PERMIT $ $ TOTAL $ $ BALANCE DUE UPON COMPLETION $ /_"7/ 7ff~ ~l t PAYMENT IS DUE UPON COMPLETION OF JOB. Finance charge of21% will be assessed on unpaid balance. , THIS PROPOSAL IS GOOD FOR 30 DAYS FROM DATE. t ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL. The above prices, specifications, terms and conditions herein and on the reverse side ofthis contract are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as stated above. Should conditions unforeseen when estimated be discovered at the time the job is started, including but not limited to underground concrete barriers, extended garage supports, concrete or asphalt layers under surface thicker than layers estimated, concrete or other debris required to be removed and/or discovered during excavation, owner authorizes contractor to proceed with job and agrees to pay contractor for additional labor costs. Contractor shall not be responsible for the disruption of service or cost of repair caused by cut telephone wires or television cable wires. AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE AGENT AGENT PHONE o Newspaper o Yellow Pages o Referral ICZ MAIL SIGNED PROPOSAL TO: 7007 20th Ave. South · Centerville, MN 55038 CUSTOMER: RETURN WHITE COPY WITH SIGNATURE KEEP YELLOW COPY FOR YOUR RECORDS PINK-OFFICE COpy .,&, INSTALLATION The hot asphalt is applied with a paving machine. This machine operates on the same principle of those used on freeways. It lays a mat of asphalt of uniform consistency. The mat is then rolled to density while hot (2500F). To gain this density the roller "squeezes" the mat to a thickness of 3 inches. It is important to note that even at a maximum density, the aggregate or stones may be seen near the surface. In areas where the material is installed by hand, the aggregate can be seen more prominently. This situation is certainly a normal one. In fact the more coarse aggregate in the asphalt mix, the stronger it is, the longer it will stand up and the less maintenance it will require. CRACKING In Minnesota, the frost penetrates the ground as deep as 3 to 4 feet. The ground, when frozen this deep, will heave sometimes as much as 1 or 2 inches. An asphalt mat will give or move to a certain extent, then it will crack and separate. These cracks are generally quite straight and go clear across the surface of the lot or driveway. The crack can be seen continuing into the lawn away from the pavement. No matter how strong the asphalt pavement is constructed, Mother Nature is stronger. Even our best highways acquire many expansion cracks. We suggest that these cracks be left alone as they will close up to a certain extent in the spring. The highway department fills them because of the extreme level of high speed traffic. In past years we have not had a problem with breakup due to these expansion cracks. GUARANTEE We guarantee all of our driveways for two years against defective materials and workmanship, including: 1. Excessive cracking due to faulty installation or materials. Note: asphalt driveways will acquire expansion cracks due to severe freezing like Minnesota's best asphalt highways acquire. This is a normal situation in this climate and is not essentially detrimental to the life expectancy of a residential driveway. When a new mat is laid over an existing asphalt or concrete driveway, cracks from the existing driveway may reappear on the new drive. 2. Chuckholes and breakup. 3. Faulty mix. Our guarantee does not cover inconsistencies in asphalt texture; settling due to previous excavation or back filling; holes due to asphalt enemies such as gas, oil, antifreeze, turpentine, or other petroleum products spilled on the asphalt; tire marks, bicycle kick stands, heel indents, ladders or other sharp objects. Guarantee does not cover water puddles without a 1.5% grade for drainage. Salt will not harm asphalt in any way. NOTICE OF LIEN RIGHTS PERSONS OR COMPANIES FURNISHING LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF REAL PROPERTY MAY ENFORCE A LIEN UPON THE IMPROVED LAND IF THEY ARE NOT PAID FOR THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS, EVEN IF SUCH PARTIES HAVE NO CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH THE OWNER. MINNESOTA LAW PERMITS THE OWNER TO WITHHOLD FROM HIS CONTRACTOR AS MUCH OF THE CONTRACT PRICE AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO MEET DEMANDS OF ALL LIEN CLAIMANTS, PAY DIRECTLY SUCH LIENS AND DEDUCT THE COST OF THEM FROM THE CONTRACT PRICE, OR WITHHOLD AMOUNTS FROM HIS CONTRACTOR UNTIL THE EXPIRATION OF ONE HUNDRED TWENTY (120) DAYS FROM THE COMPLETION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS UNLESS THE CON- TRACTOR FURNISHES TO THE OWNER WAIVERS OF CLAIMS FROM MECHANICS' LIENS SIGNED BY PERSONS WHO FURNISHED LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT AND WHO PROVIDED THE OWNER WITH TIMELY NOTICE. THE OWNER HEREBY WAIVES ALL FURTHER REQUIREMENTS OF NOTICE UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTE 514.011. Grade Date Blacktop Date ; INSTALLATION The hot asphalt is applied with a paving machine. This machine operates on the same principle of those used on freeways. It lays a mat of asphalt of uniform consistency. The mat is then rolled to density while hot (2500F). To gain this density the roller "squeezes" the mat to a thickness of 3 inches. It is important to note that even at a maximum density, the aggregate or stones may be seen near the surface. In areas where the material is installed by hand, the aggregate can be seen more prominently. This situation is certainly a normal one. In fact the more coarse aggregate in the asphalt mix, the stronger it is, the longer it will stand up and the less maintenance it will require. CRACKING In Minnesota, the frost penetrates the ground as deep as 3 to 4 feet. The ground, when frozen this deep, will heave sometimes as much as 1 or 2 inches. An asphalt mat will give or move to a certain extent, then it will crack and separate. These cracks are generally quite straight and go clear across the surface of the lot or driveway. The crack can be seen continuing into the lawn away from the pavement. No matter how strong the asphalt pavement is constructed, Mother Nature is stronger. Even our best highways acquire many expansion cracks. We suggest that these cracks be left alone as they will close up to a certain extent in the spring. The highway department fills them because of the extreIl)e level of high speed traffic. In past years we have not had a problem with breakup due to these expansion cracks. GUARANTEE We guarantee all of our driveways for two years against defective materials and workmanship, including: 1. Excessive cracking due to faulty installation or materials. Note: asphalt driveways will acquire expansion cracks due to severe freezing like Minnesota's best asphalt highways acquire. This is a normal situation in this climate and is not essentially detrimental to the life expectancy of a residential driveway. When a new mat is laid over an existing asphalt or concrete driveway, cracks from the existing driveway may reappear on the new drive. 2. Chuckholes and breakup. 3. Faulty mix. Our guarantee does not cover inconsistencies in asphalt texture; settling due to previous excavation or back filling; holes due to asphalt enemies such as gas, oil, antifreeze, turpentine, or other petroleum products spilled on the asphalt; tire marks, bicycle kick stands, heel indents, ladders or other sharp objects. Guarantee does not cover water puddles without a 1.5% grade for drainage. Salt will not harm asphalt in any way. NOTICE OF LIEN RIGHTS PERSONS OR COMPANIES FURNISHING LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF REAL PROPERTY MAY ENFORCE A LIEN UPON THE IMPROVED LAND IF THEY ARE NOT PAID FOR THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS, EVEN IF SUCH PARTIES HAVE NO CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH THE OWNER. MINNESOTA LAW PERMITS THE OWNER TO WITHHOLD FROM HIS CONTRACTOR AS MUCH OF THE CONTRACT PRICE AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO MEET DEMANDS OF ALL LIEN CLAIMANTS, PAY DIRECTLY SUCH LIENS AND DEDUCT THE COST OF THEM FROM THE CONTRACT PRICE, OR WITHHOLD AMOUNTS FROM HIS CONTRACTOR UNTIL THE EXPIRATION OF ONE HUNDRED TWENTY (120) DAYS FROM THE COMPLETION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS UNLESS THE CON- TRACTOR FURNISHES TO THE OWNER WAIVERS OF CLAIMS FROM MECHANICS' LIENS SIGNED BY PERSONS WHO FURNISHED LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT AND WHO PROVIDED THE OWNER WITH TIMELY NOTICE. THE OWNER HEREBY WAIVES ALL FURTHER REQUIREMENTS OF NOTICE UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTE 514.011. Grade Date Blacktop Date J9 ::= 10/05/2006 THU 16:30 :::1 Certificate of Insurance FAX 763 694 9955 THE INTERAGENCY ~001/001 ~ 10/4/2006 PRODUCERS' Beulke Agency, Inc 902240 4782 Washington Avo White Bear Lake, MN 55110 The InterAgency/Blackburn, Nickels & Smith, Inc. Box 47248 Plymouth, MN 55447 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INeVRED: Company Providing Coverage: Trio Inn, Mountain Enterprises, Inc. DBA: 6510 Centerville Road Lino Lakes. MN 55038 :::.::B9Y~[~~S!:'!:i.:::~: Capitol Specialty Ins Co. This is to certify that the policies of insurance listed below have been issued to the insured named above for the policy period indicated, not withstanding any requirement, term or condition of any contract or other document with respect to which this certificate may be issued or may pertain, the insurance afforded by the policies described herein is subject to all the terms, exclusions and conditions of such policies. Limits shown may have been reduced by paid claims. Type of Insurance Policy Number Policy Effective Policy Expiration Limits Dale Date General Liability General Aggregate Products - CompOp Agg Comm'l Gen. Liab. Personal 8. Adv Injury Each Occurrence Fire Damage (Any One Fire) Med Exp (Any One Person) Liquor Liability CS00330517 1 0/5/2006 10/5/2007 Aggregate Limit $500,000 Ea. Common Cause Limit $500,000 PROPERTY Limils: Coinsurance: Form; Deductible: Building: Business Personal Property Business Income: LOCATION( OF RISK DESCRIPTION OF RISK 7082 Centerville Road, Centerville, MN 55038 Tavern. Liquor Liability I Certificate Holder Cancellation : ___I City of Centerville 1880 Main Street CEnterville. MN 55038 Should any of lhe described policies be cal'1celled before the expiration dale thereof, lho Issuing company will endeavor 10 mail 10 days wrinen nolice of oanoellation to the eer1ifieateholder named to the left. but failure to mail sueh notice lOhall impoee no obligation ility of an'!,Jiri/lJn the company. its agents or representatives. ~ Jf""'"~ Authorized Representative im Holm bnsmn@aol.eom tervi[[e 'Esta611sfled 1857 1880 :Main Street, Centerviffe, :MW 55038 651-429-3232 or 'FaJ( 651-429-8629 September 26, 2006 Chad Pranke Heather Fischer 7154 Mill Road Centerville, MN 55038 Re: Halloween Signs Dear Mr. Pranke and Ms. Fischer: I wish to point out to you that the City has adopted new signage rules that regulate lawn signs. I have attached a copy of the pertinent sections for your use. Basically, lawn message signs are limited by city law to one sign, not exceeding six square feet (2 x 3 or similar) per residential property. This does not cover political candidate/issue lawn signs during the weeks leading up to the General Election on November 7, 2006. Please make sure that if you put up any sign for Halloween, that you observe these limitations. Please contact me if you should have any questions. Yours truly, Dga~~ Centennial Lakes Police Department 54 North Road, Circle Pines, MN 55014 (763) 784-2501 Fax (763) 784-0082 October 03, 2006 Wendy Kellogg Brilowski 7124 Main Street. Centerville, MN 55038 Dear Mrs. Brilowski, On September 22, 2006, your dog, "Greta" a German Shepherd was involved in a bite incident. (Centennial Lakes Police Department ICR #06-227592). You are hereby notified pursuant to CenterviIle City Ordinance 90.30, that your dog Greta is designated a POTENTIALLYDANGEROUSA~. Pursuant to City Ordinance 90.30 an owner of a potentially dangerou~ animal shall be registered by the City stating your dog is potentially dangerous. Additionally, per ordinance 90.30 you are required to license the dog with the city and provide proof of vaccinations to the city. Pursuant to City Ordinance 90.30 you must obtain microchip identification for your dog. Please make arrane:ements to ree:ister.license and microchin your doe: within two weeks. If the animal is to be relocated from its current address or given or sold to another person, the notification must be given in writing at least fourteen (14) days prior to relocation or transfer of ownership. The notification must include the current owner's name and address, the relocation address, and the name of the new owner, ifany. I have enclosed a copy ofCenterville Ordinance 90.30 (Designation as Dangerous or Potentially Dangerous Animal), 90.31 (Notification of New Address), and 90.32 (Dangerous Animal or Potentially Dangerous Animal Requirements) for your review. Please contact me at the above listed number or the City ofCenterviIle at 651-429-3232 should you have any questions regarding these ordinances. Sincerely, Robert A. Makela Chief of Police Emily Kirchner Community Service Officer RABIES VACCINATION CERTIFICATE ADAPTED NASPHV FORM 51 Print - use ball point pen or type Owner's Name & Address PRINT LAST ( NO. SPEClpy SEX: Dog ~ Male Cat 0 . Female, Other 0 ' Altered (Specify) SIZE: Under 20 Ibs. 20 - 50 Ibs. Over 50 Ibs. DATE VACCINATED: '8 ~Jf-Dh Month Day Year PRODUCER: ~ VACCINATION EXPIRES: g-~/-Dq (First 3 Letters) 1 yr. Uc.Nacc. ~ 3 yr. LicNacc~ /~soIA Vacc. Serial (Lot) No. Month Day Year FDPC0129C GY~b- Tag fee $: Tag#: d.- 3'7.5C:; M.1. Cert. Serial #: TELEPHONE tf J/j.; q 3 'J--3 ZIP STATE PREDOMINANT BREED: o n ~ L o Gr~r .:jlu:~ NAME: iJ /j I (;rr ~-Ia ~ COLORS: h/~elc oJ..- -ftl4'J Veterinarian's # License No. V''''ri",rii Signature V ,,0 ~ 'St.''!: - X i;;AL ~S;;ITAl SteHwcter, Minn. 43~1618 ~ ~o-:F\=- oCo 8 VACCI~A1!ON 'RECORD It f- 1.>-,") -h: "- Name , -:r 1 ~o/ to\' -B" RABIES .....-EJ LYME DISEASE ~ CANINE DISTEMPER .-EJ CANINE PARAINFLUENZ ~ CANINE ADENOVIRUS 2 ~ CANINE PARVOVIRUS' , 0 CANINE CORONAVIRUS o CANINE BORDETELLA o LEPTOSPIROSIS o CAN./FEL. GIARDIA o FELINE LEUKEMIA 0' FEliNE PANLEUKOPEf\il, o FELINE RHINOTRACHEIl o FELINE CALlCIVIRUS o FELINE CHLAMYDIA o FELINE RINGWORM o FELINE lMMUNODEFICIEN VIRUS ~ \fV\Gvl~ ~ ~ ~V~ \0 LJj;(Ct ' 1-\OZ Ll ~CA(~ S~ L~vt\RA! 0~ \~ ~ ~\\~d \Dl~.lo~ t:.~? ~~ rf'Or~rl;\;.[~~ j""!1 ,.,.- ,. ." ,'-, G\,d '\..:.k=.=:.~~'~ll'" - [,t"\7 0 p t-~tl~'~~~ .:t/l j ~ Lu~tl ---.' "LLr- . ~ fld CENiH-<.VI C,1\,'" ~ 10/2/06 ,.---- t \ \ f. r -----1 \ \ \ ~J To Whom It May Concern: We moved to Centerville, 7124 Main Street, on August 12,2004. Since moving here we have had had to deal with a variety of issues that have caused us great inconvenience and aggravation. When we purchased out home we called the city to ask about being hooked up to the city water system because we had a concern over the existing well. At that time we were told that all water concerns would be taken up by the city council when the road construction issue on County Road 14 was settled. As the problem with our well grew worse we called on 3 more occasions. We were repeatedly told that this matter would wait for the road construction and that we could get on city water when the road in front of our house was dug up sometime in 2008. This spring we lost almost all water pressure. Our situation was grave. We called again and demanded that something be done because the lack of water had become a quality of life issue and a potential health hazard. This is when we found out that our being hooked up to city water actually had nothing what so ever to do with the road construction in the front of our home and that water would come in through the back. We have waited for over 5 months since reporting our situation and we still do not have city water. We have been given all kinds of erroneous information and spent hours on the phone trying to find out about the bidding process, how we could be hooked up to a hydrant if need be, what the assessment would be, who would be responsible for acquiring and paying for a check valve, etc. etc. When a contractor was finally hired they gave us a date and were ready to start work immediately. The day that the contractors were to begin it was discovered that no one from the city had acquired the appropriate permits from the health department. This meant another 3-week delay. Not only was this inconvenient for us, it also cost the contractors lost time and money. On Tuesday Sept. 19th the contractor began work on the project. It was discovered at the end of the day that the wrong fittings had been used. The inspector sent by the city did not catch the problem when he made his inspection. The job had to be re-done leading to another delay. We still are not able to hook up to city water because we are waiting for a chloroform test and a hydro stat test to be run. This was not contracted with Olson's sewer service. We do not even know if anyone plans on doing this test. Therefore, even though the water lines have been installed, we STILL do not have city water. . .. Another aggravation for us has been the city redevelopment plan. We spent many hours at meetings. We continually expressed our concern about being included in the redevelopment plan. Why should we even be considered for a commercial zoning when there is no access to our property for a business concern? In the end the city council did agree and maintained our residential zoning. However, it should have been clear from looking at a map that there would never be a commercial interest in our property. We should not have had to speak at a council meeting in order to express this concern. The next item that we have had to deal with is the fact that the City never appropriately recorded the road abandonment of West view Street back in the 1970's. We have no record of this transaction in our abstract. We are currently responsible for maintaining this property but no one is certain as to the actual ownership of this property. Again, I have had to call the county, my title company, and the City of Centerville because the appropriate actions were not taken by the city. The matter is still being considered by the city attorney. Over the weekend we received a certified letter stating that our dog is not licensed. Our dog has license number 068 and our cat has license number 067 for the year 2006-2007. It was only by contacting the Centennial Lakes Police Department that I have learned that the actual concern is regarding up to date vaccination records. This matter can be easily cleared up. The letter I received stated that the dog is unlicensed; it said nothing about vaccination records. I would think that at the very least the city should be able to make the appropriate request from us. Weare still waiting for our street to be cleaned and the black top to be replaced. Weare greatly frustrated by all of these incompetencies and miscommunications. Path: H:\Projects\4994-F\H I-M U\DRAI NAGE\ File: H :\Projects\4994-F\H I-MU\DRAI NAGE\4994-F-Drainage Systems(60% ).xls CSAH 14 Reconstruction Drainage Cost Split Outfall Mound Trail Grit Chamber Peltier Lakeland N. Lakeland S. Untreated Clearwater N. Clearwater S. C.H. Ditch 55 W. Ditch 55 E. 42" & 27" Totals Total System Cost Total ~ CA $13,452.00 0.85 $79,616.00 3.70 $28,122.00 1.59 $48,003.00 2.46 $75,317.00 2.16 $33,774.00 13.19 $128,374.00 5.25 $86,602.00 4.01 $278,756.00 8.58 $152,502.00 4.94 $218,459.00 4.41 $122,686.00 1.00 $1,265,663.00 52.14 Total ~ CA Cent. 0.53 2.05 1.34 1.03 0.54 0.79 3.46 2.61 4.39 1.02 0.99 o 18.75 Total ~ CA Lino Total ~ CA County Total Cost Cent. Total Cost Lino Total Cost County o 0.32 $8,387.72 $0.00 $5,064.28 o 1.65 $44,111.57 $0.00 $35,504.43 o 0.25 $23,700.30 $0.00 $4,421.70 o 1.43 $20,098.82 $0.00 $27,904.18 o 1.62 $18,829.25 $0.00 $56,487.75 o 12.40 $2,022.86 $0.00 $31,751.14 o 1,79 $84,604.58 $0.00 $43,769.42 o 1.40 $56,366.89 $0.00 $30,235.11 o 4.19 $142,626.90 $0.00 $136,129.10 o 3.92 $31,488.27 $0.00 $121,013.73 1.8 1.62 $49,041.82 $89,166.94 $80,250.24 o 1,00 $0.00 $0.00 $122,686.00 1.80 31.59 $481,278.98 $89,166.94 $695,217.08 Participation Breakout (%) 38.03% 7.05% 54.92% Notes: Costs based on 60% Estimate to all relevant storm sewer costs. Mound Trail Grit Chamber Peltier Lakeland N. Lakeland S. Untreated Clearwater N. Clearwater S. C.H. Ditch 55 W. Ditch 55 E. 42" & 27" offsite nodes 5031,5032 5049,5299 5060,5070 5086 5102 5115 5136,5144,5142,5140 5145,5148,5153,5163,5166,5172,5174,5177 ,5180,5183,5188,5189 5201,5202,5216 5249,5251,5268,5269 all county By: CMT Date:5/2I2OO6 EXHIBIT A 60% ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ANOKA COUNTY C.S.A.H. 14 RECONSTRUCTION DATE PRINTED: 1014/2001 C.SA.H. 14 RECONSTRUCTION UNIT TOTAL PROJECT S,P,02..tl14-24 C.SA.H.14 C.SA.H. 64 C.SA.H.21 S.P.210-020-005 S,P. 02-6&4-001 S.P.02--621-009 NON-PARTICIPATING ANOKA COUNTY CITY OF L1NO LAKES CITY OF CENTEfMLLE ANOKA COUNTY CITY OF CENTERVIlLE ANOKA COUNTY CITY OF CENTERVlL.LE ANOKA COUNTY CITY OF UNO LAKES CITY OF CENTERVlUE ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST QUANTITIES COST RONJWAY RONJWAY RONJWAY ROAaWAY ROKJWAY RONJWAY ROKJWAY STORM DUANTITES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT Ot.IANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED CeST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM $700,000,00 1 $700.000.00 0.95 $666.000.00 0.05 $36.000.00 2031.501 FIELD OFFICE. TYPE 0 EACH $15,000.00 1 $15.000.00 0,95 $14.26ll.00 0,05 $760.00 2101.501 CLEARING ACRE $1.500.00 33 M9.600.00 32.9 $49.360.00 01 $160.00 2101.502 CLEARING TREE $200.00 169 $33.800.00 164 $32.800.00 3 $600.00 2 $400.00 2101.506 GRUBBING ACRE $1.500.00 " $49.600.00 32.9 $49.360.00 01 $160.00 2101.507 GRUBBING TREE $200.00 169 $33.800.00 164 $32.800.00 3 $600.00 2 $400.00 2102.50'\ PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL sa FT $1.50 33000 $49.600.00 33000 $49.600.00 2104.501 REMOVE BITUMINOUS CURB lINFT $1.50 2000 $3.000.00 2000 $3.000.00 2104.501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER L1NFT $2.50 1672 $3.930.00 1572 $3.930.00 2104.501 REMOVE FENCE UN FT $2.50 3267 $6.1".60 3257 $6.142_60 2104.501 REMOVE FORCE MAIN L1NFT $15.00 1061 $16.766.00 1051 $16.766.00 2104.501 REMOVE PIPE CULVERTS lINFT $10.00 3938 $39.380.00 3360 $33.600.00 152 $1,520.00 426 $4.260.00 2104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) UNFT $10.00 2765 $27.660.00 2755 $27.660.00 2104.501 REMOVE WATER MAIN lINFT $10.00 1001 $10.010.00 570 $S,700.DO 25 $260.00 406 M,060.00 2104.501 REMOVE GUARD RAIL lINFT $10,00 431 $4.310.00 431 $4.310.00 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT savo $200 90879 $181,358.00 82084 $114.168.00 3175 $6.360.00 5420 $10.&10.00 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALK sa FT $1,50 4347 $6.620.60 4347 $6.620.60 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK sa FT $2.00 2760 $6.600.00 2150 $6.600.00 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SaYD $5.00 360 $1.800.00 360 $1.800.00 2104.509 REMOVE CULVERT APRON EACH $250.00 134 $33.600.00 116 $29.000.00 6 $1 ,SOD.OO 12 $3.000.00 2104.509 REMOVE DELINEATOR EACH $25,00 10 $290.00 10 $260.00 2104.509 REMOVE CURB STOP & BOX EACH $500,00 6 $2.600.00 5 $2.500.00 2104.509 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOX EACH $500.00 4 $2.000.00 4 $2,000.00 2104.509 REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN EACH $250,00 22 $6.600.00 " $6.600.00 2104,509 REMOVE MARKER EACH $25.00 26 $620.00 25 $620 .00 2104.509 REMOVE PIPE APRON EACH $250.00 9 $2.260.00 , $2.260.00 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN TYPE C EACH $30,00 176 $6.340.00 173 $6.190.00 5 $150.00 2104.511 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L1NFT $5,00 73 $366.00 73 $366.00 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) UN FT $2.00 3090 $6.180.00 1928 $3.866.00 641 $1.282.00 521 $1.042.00 2104.523 SALVAGE CASTING EACH $250.00 16 $4,800.00 16 $4.600.00 2104.523 SALVAGE GATE VALVE EACH saco,oo 17 $13.600.00 12 $9.600.00 3 $2.400.00 1 1800 .00 1 $6DO.OO 2104.523 SALVAGE HYDRANT EACH $800.00 21 $16.800.00 16 $12,800.00 3 $2,400.00 1 $6DO.OO 1 $800.00 2104.523 SALVAGE LIGHT POLE EACH $500.00 1 $600.00 1 $600.00 2104.523 SAlVAGE PIPE APRON EACH $5,000.00 2 $10,000.00 2 $10.000.00 2104.523 SALVAGE PIPE PLUG EACH $200,00 4 $6DO_OO 4 $6DO.OO 2104.601 HAUL SALVAGED MATERIAL LUMP SUM $5.000.00 1 $6.000.00 1 $6.000.00 2104.602 SALVAGE MAILBOX EACH $100.00 08 $6.900.00 55 $6.600.00 2 $200.00 2 $200.00 2105,501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) CUYD $6,00 153635 $921.810.00 138345 $130.070.00 5394 $32.314.00 9896 $&9.376.00 2105.505 MUCK EXCAVATION (P) cuvo $4,00 31378 $126.612.00 31378 $12S,612.OO 2105.507 SUBGRAOE EXCAVATION (P) CUYD $3.50 62722 $219.827.00 57113 $201.998.$0 2165 $7.677.60 ".. $9.964.00 2105.511 COMMON CHANNEL EXCAVATION (P) cuvo $8.00 2720 $21,600.00 2125 $21.600.00 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (LV) cuvo $7.00 180S60 $',263.920.00 171400 $1,199,900.00 4700 $32.900.00 4460 $31.220.00 2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW (CI/) CUYD $8.00 10000 $60.000.00 7500 $60.000_00 2500 $20.000.00 2105.601 DEWATERING LUMP SUM $50,000,00 1 $60.000.00 1 $60.000.00 2105.602 SETTLEMENT PLATES EACH $300,00 90 $27.000.00 90 $27.000.00 2105,604 GEOTEXTlLE FABRIC TYPE IV SaYD $3.00 6460 $16,470.00 5490 $16"70.00 2105.604 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V savo $1.25 113926 $142,407.&0 91100 $113,87&.00 17120 $21.400.00 5706 $7,132.50 2105.607 EXCAVATION SPECIAL 1 (P) cuvo $6.00 34731 $208.396.00 34731 $208.386.00 2105.607 FILL SPECIAl (LV) CUYD $5.00 132678 $663,390.00 95936 $479.660.00 21928 $'39.140.00 8814 &14.070.00 2130.501 WATER MGAL $25.00 600 $16.000.00 400 $10.000.00 100 $2.600.00 100 $2.600.00 2211.503 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 (P) cuvo $16.00 159292 $948.672.00 50439 $607.024.00 856 $13.696.00 1501 $24,112.00 3739 $&9,824.00 2654 M2,464.00 97 $1,552.00 2221.502 AGGREGATE SHOULDERING (CV) CLASS 5 (P) cuvo $16.00 414 $7,744.00 439 $7.024.00 18 $288.00 27 "32_00 10F15 EXHIBIT A 60% ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ANOKA COUNTY C.S.A.H. 14 RECONSTRUCTION DATE PAINTED: 101412008 C.SA.H. 14 RECONSTRUCTION UNIT TOTAL PROJECT S.P. 02-614-24- C.IA.H.1. C.IA,H. 54 C.SA.H.21 S.P.210-020-oo5 S.P. 02-654-001 S.P.02.621.009 NON-PARTICIPATING ANOKA COUNTY CITY OF L1NO LAKES CITY OF CENTERVlLLE ANOKA COUNTY CITY OF CENTERVlLLE ANOKA COUNTY CITY OF CENTERVILLE ANOKA COI.JolTY CITY OF L1NO LAKES OTY OF CENTERVIllE ITEMNQ. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST QUANTITIES COST ROADWAY ROADWAY RONJWAY RO/IDWAY RONJWAY ROICWAY RONJWAY STORM QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT CUANTfTES SEGMENT QUANmlES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES seGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIfMTED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATI!:D COST 2301.553 BRIDGE APPROACH PANELS SQYD $80.00 193 $15,440.00 193 $15,440.00 2350.501 TYPE LV 3 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (8) TON $42.00 elI1 $2"'02.00 547 $22.91".00 34 $1,428.00 2350.501 TYPE LV 4 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (8) TON $40.00 2221 $88,840.00 773 $30,920.00 1365 $&4,600.00 83 $3,320.00 2350.502 TYPE LV 4 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS, 3 INCH SOVO $15.00 .,.. $71.160.00 4148 $65,220.00 396 $0.940.00 2350.502 TYPE M't/ 3 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TON $45.00 51&7 $232.066.00 3907 $175,81&.00 769 $34.60&.00 481 $21.&10.00 2350.502 TYPE LV 3 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (8) TON $42.00 elI1 $24,402.00 547 $22.914.00 34 $1,428.00 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAl FOR TACK COAT GALLON $1.50 18510 $21.1".00 16243 $24.)&1.00 1260 $1.890.00 1007 $1.O10~0 13tO.W1 TYPE SP 12.5 WEl\RlNG COURSE MIX (4,F) TON $50.00 28809 $1....,400.00 25189 $1,2159..4&0.00 2013 $100.6&0.00 1687 $14.300.00 2360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (4.B) TON $47.00 1314& $800.110.00 12059 $6".113.00 980 $46.060.00 806 $31.882.00 BRIDGE SOFT $100.00 0..3 $866.300.00 5411.78 $141.116.00 251,22 $25,122.00 2411.603 CONCRETE RETAINING WAlL UNFT $1,400.00 160 $252.000.00 180 $202.000.00 2411.603 RET AlNfNG WALL SOFT $40,00 6646 $261.840.00 6546 $261.&10.00 2442.501 REMOVE OLD BRIDGE LUMP SUM $10.000.00 1 $10.000.00 1 $10.000.00 2452.618 STEEL SHEET PILING (TEMPORARY) SOFT $25.00 ..00 $110.000.00 4400 $110.000.00 2501.511 12- CS PIPE CULVERT LtNFT $24,00 66 $1.0<Cl.00 65 $1.080.00 2501.511 12- RC PIPE CULVERT DES 3006 L1N FT $25.00 78 $1,960.00 7B $1.900.00 2501.511 15" CS PIPE CULVERT lINfT $26.00 368 $S.3CI8.00 358 $1.308.00 2501.511 15" RC PIPE CULVERT DES 3006 UN FT $27.00 36ll $1.963.00 369 $1.963.00 2501.511 21" CS PIPE CULVERT UN FT $30.00 120 $3.800.00 120 $3.600.00 2501.511 24" CS PIPE CULVERT UN FT $32.00 82 $2.....00 82 $2.624.00 2501.511 24" RC PIPE CULVERT DES 3006 UN FT $34,00 10 $2.380.00 70 $2.380.00 2501.511 36" CS PIPE CULVERT UNFT $45,00 88 $3.060.00 6B $3.080.00 2501.515 12- CS PIPE APRON EACH $225.00 2 $480.00 2 $400.00 2Ml1.515 12-RC PIPE APRON EACH $400.00 1 $2.800.00 2 $800.00 5 $2.000.00 2501.515 15- CS PIPE APRON EACH $250,00 8 $1.500.00 6 $1.000.00 2501.515 15" RC PIPE APRON EACH $500.00 12 $8.000.00 6 $3.000.00 6 $3.000.00 2501.515 18" RC PIPE APRON EACH $550.00 2 $1, tOO.DO 2 $1.100.00 2501.515 21. CS PIPE APRON EACH $275,00 4 $1.100.00 4 $1,100.00 2501.515 21"RCPIPEAPRON EACH $600.00 0 $3.000.00 5 $3.000.00 2501.515 24" CS PIPE APRON EACH $300.00 4 $1.200.00 4 $1.200.00 2501.515 24" RC PIPE APRON EACH $700.00 8 $8.800.00 2 $1.400.00 6 $4.200.00 2501.515 27" RC PIPE APRON EACH $800.00 2 $1.800.00 2 ".'00.00 2501.515 30. RC PIPE APRON EACH $900,00 4 $3.800.00 4 $3.800.00 2501.515 33" RC PIPE APRON EACH $1.000.00 3 $3.000.00 3 $3.000.00 2501.515 36" CS PIPE APRON EACH $450.00 4 $1.800.00 4 $1.800.00 2501.515 36" RC PIPE APRON EACH $1,100,00 2 $2.200.00 2 $2.200.00 2501.515 42" RC PIPE APRON EACH $1.200,00 1 $1,200.00 1 $1,200.00 2501.521 122" SPAN RC PIPE-ARCH CULVERT UNFT $750,00 ell $42,000.00 56 $42,000.00 2501.573 INSTAlL PIPE APRON EACH $5.000.00 2 $10.000.00 2 $10.000.00 2501.601 DRAINAGE IMPRVMNTS & REPAIR PIPE CULV LUMP SUM $2,000.00 1 $2.000.00 1 $2.000.00 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 12- PIPE APRON EACH $650.00 0 $3.200.00 5 $3.200.00 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 15- PIPE APRON EACH $700,00 12 $8.400.00 12 $1,400.00 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 18" PIPE APRON EACH $750,00 2 $1.800.00 2 $1.600.00 2501,602 TRASH GUARD FOR 21" PIPE APRON EACH $800.00 0 $4.000.00 5 $4.000.00 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 24" PIPE APRON EACH $900.00 8 $1.200.00 8 $1.200.00 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 27" PIPE APRON EACH $1,000.00 2 $2.000.00 2 $2.000.00 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 30" PIPE APRON EACH $1,100.00 4 $4,400.00 4 $4,400.00 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 33- PIPE APRON EACH $1,200.00 3 $3.800.00 3 $3.800.00 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 36" PIPE APRON EACH $1,300.00 2 $2.600.00 2 $2.800.00 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 42- PIPE APRON EACH $1.500,00 1 $1.1500.00 1 $1.600.00 2502.521 4" TP PIPE DRAIN LtNFT $7.50 8200 $4"'00.00 5200 $39.000.00 500 $3.100.00 500 $3.100.00 2502.604 4-INSULATION SOYD $30.00 3&0 $10.800.00 350 $10,6oo.QQ 2503.541 12- RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 LtNFT $25.00 4288 $101.200.00 4288 $101.200.00 2503.541 15- RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 LtNFT $27,00 2840 $16.810.00 2845 $18.816.00 2503.541 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 LtNFT $30.00 2069 $61.770.00 2059 $81.170.00 2OfO EXHIBIT A 60% ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ANOKA COUNTY C.SAH. 14 RECONSTRUCTION DATE PRINTED: 10141200t C,SA.H. 14 RECONSTRUCTION UNIT TOTAL PROJECT SP.02-El14.-24 C,SA.H.1. C.SAH. &4 C.SA.H.21 S.P.210-020-oo5 S.P.02-654-oo1 S.P. 02-621-009 NON-PARTlCIPATlNG ANOKACOUNTY CITY OF L1NO LAKES CITY OF CENTERVlLLE ANOKA COUNTY CITY OF CENTERVA.LE MlOKA COUNTY CITY OF CENTERVlLLE ANOKACOUNTY CITY OF UNO LAKES CITY OF CENTEFMLLE ITEM NO. ITEM OESCRJPTJON UNIT COST QUANTITIES COST ROADWAY Rf>>DWAY ROADWAY RON:JWAY RONJWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY STORM QUANTITES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QLW4T1TfES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGM:NT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTiMATED COST 2503.541 21" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 L1NFT $32.00 1878 $80.128.00 1679 $60.128.00 2503.541 24- RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 L1NFT $34.00 10001 $34.136.00 1004 $3oto,136.00 2503.541 27" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 L1N FT $38.00 883 $32.794.00 863 $32,794.00 2503.541 30" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 L1NFT $45,00 1661 $T5.106.oo 1669 $76.10e.ao 2503.541 33" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 L1NFT $50,00 1113 $&5.6&0.00 1113 *.6eo.00 2503.541 36- RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 L1NFT $55.00 70 $3.8&0.00 70 $3.850.00 2503.541 .2" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 L1NFT $65.00 804 $158.760.00 904 $&8,760.00 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH $500.00 4 $2.000.00 4 $2.000.00 2503.602 RECONSTRUCT LIFT STATION (SANITARY) L1NFT $2,000.00 7.4 $14.800.00 7.4 $14.800.00 2503.603 4" PVC FORCE MAIN UNFT $25.00 1060 $2UOO.OO 1060 $28.500.00 2503,G03 6" PVC SANITARY SERVICE PIPE UN FT $25.00 93 $2.325.00 93 $2.325.00 2503.G03 21" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 L1NFT $500.00 25 $12.500.00 25 $12.500.00 2504.G02 ADJUST CURB BOX EACH $60,00 28 $1.680.00 28 $1.880.00 2504.G02 ADJUST HYDRANT EACH $1.000.00 2 $2.000.00 2 $2.000.00 2504.602 ADJUST VAlVE BOX EACH $200.00 46 $9.200.00 1 $200.00 30 $8.000.00 11 $2~00.00 4 $800.00 2504.G02 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAlN EACH $1,000.00 25 $25.000.00 14 $14.000.00 7 $T.DDO.OO 2 $2.000.00 2 $2.000.00 2504.G02 HYDRANT EACH $2.500.00 2 $5.000.00 2 $5.000.00 2504.602 INSTAll GATE VALVE & BOX EACH $400.00 17 $8.800.00 12 $4.800.00 3 $1,200.00 1 $400.00 1 $400.00 2504.602 INSTALL HYDRANT EACH $1.100.00 21 $23.100.00 16 $17.800.00 3 $3.300.00 1 $1.100.00 1 $1.100.00 2504.602 INSTAlL PLUG EACH $250.00 4 $1.000.00 4 $1.000 .00 2504.G02 1" CURB STOP AND BOX EACH $80000 21 $16.800.00 5 $4.000.00 16 $1'.800.00 2504.602 6" GATE VAlVE AND BOX EACH $900.00 , $1.600,00 2 $1.800.00 2504.602 6" MEGAlUG EACH $50.00 101 $5.080.00 67 $3.3&0.00 20 $1.000.00 4 $200.00 10 $000.00 2504.602 e" MEGALUG EACH $75,00 20 $1.500.00 20 $1.800.00 2504 ,602 10" MEGALUG EACH $85,00 ,. $1.360.00 8 $880.00 8 $880.00 2504.602 12" MEGALUG EACH $100.00 13 $1.300.00 8 $800.00 5 $800.00 2504.602 S"X6"WET TAP EACH $1.500,00 1 $1.500.00 1 $1.&00.00 2504,602 10-XS-WET TAP EACH $1.800,00 1 $1.800.00 1 $1.800.00 2504.602 12"XG"WET TAP EACH $2,000.00 , $4.000.00 2 $4.000.00 2504.603 1- PVC WA TERMAlN UN FT $20.00 855 $19,100.00 273 $&.480.00 682 $13.640.00 2504.603 6" PVC WATERMAlN L1NFT $25.00 180 $4.500.00 120 83.000.00 60 $1.800.00 2504,603 6" WA TERMAlN DUCTILE IRON Cl 50 L1N FT $35,00 480 $1'.800.00 480 "'.&00.00 2504.603 e- PVC WA TERMAIN UN FT $35.00 m $27.896.00 797 $27.896.00 2504.603 10" PVC WATERMAlN L1NFT $38,00 800 $22.800.00 150 $&.700.00 450 $17.100.00 2504,603 12" PVC WA TERMAlN UN FT $40.00 9110 $38.000 .00 516 $20.840.00 434 $17.360.00 2504.60e WA TERMAlN FITTINGS LBS $5,00 23&3 $11.76&.00 1162 $&.810.00 408 $2.040.00 783 $3,91e.00 2506,501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 UNFT $250.00 112 $28.000.00 112 $28.000.00 2506.501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 54--4020 LlNFT $300,00 84 $18.200.00 64 $19.200.00 2506.501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 60-04020 llN FT $350.00 6 $1,7&0.00 5 $1,760.00 2506,501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 66-4-020 L1NFT $400.00 4' $16.8DO.00 42 $1..600.00 2506.501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 72-4020 LlNFT $450,00 23 $10.3&0.00 23 $10.350.00 2506.501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES &4-4020 LlN FT $600.00 12 $7 ,200.00 12 $T .200.00 2506.501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 90-4020 UN FT $700.00 12 68.400.00 12 $8.400.00 2506,501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 96-4020 UNFT $900.00 7 $&.800.00 7 $&.800.00 2506.501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 108-<4020 L1NFT $900,00 8 $T ~oo .00 8 $T.'OO.OO 2506.501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 120-4020 UN FT $1,000.00 10 $10.000.00 10 $10.000.00 2506.501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN G UNFT $250.00 430 $107.eoo.00 430 $107,&00.00 2506.501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN H UNFT $250,00 88 $22.000.00 88 $22.000.00 2506.502 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 1 EACH $30.000,00 1 $30.000.00 1 $30.000.00 2506,502 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 2 EACH $3.500.00 4 $14.000.00 4 $1..000.00 2506.502 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 3 EACH $4.000.00 3 $12.000.00 3 $12.000.00 2506.502 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAl.. 4 EACH $4.000.00 1 $4.000.00 1 $4.000.00 2506,516 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH $450.00 211 $94.850.00 211 $94.850.00 2506.523 INSTAll CASTING EACH $250.00 18 $4.800.00 18 $4.500.00 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EACH $300.00 18 $&.400.00 16 $4,800.00 1 S3OO.oo 1 8300.00 2506.602 CONNECT INTO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH $500.00 4 $2.000.00 4 $2.000.00 30F15 EXHIBIT A 60% ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ANOKA COUNTY C.S.A.H. 14 RECONSTRUCTION DATE PRINTED: ,0N2006 C.SAH. 14 RECONSTRUCTION UNIT TOTAL PROJECT S.P. 02-614-:U C.S.A.H.14 C,SAH.54 C.SA.H.21 S.P.21l).02lH05 S.P. 02-654-001 SP.02-621-009 NOr+PARTICIPATING ANOKA COUNTY CITY OF LINO LAKES CfTY OF CENTERVlLLE ANOKA COUNTY CITY OF CENTERVILLE ANOKA COUNTY CITY OF CENTERVILLE ANOKA COUNTY CITY OF L1NO LAKES CITY OF CENTERVlLLE ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST QUANTITIES COST ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY RON>WAY RON:fWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY STORM QUANTJTES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT OUANTlTIES seGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT OUANTlTlES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT OUANTITlES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTiMATED COST ESTIMATED COST 2506.603 RECONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLES UN FT $300,00 72 $21.600.00 60.5 $18.'00.00 6.6 $1.1180.00 .., $1~70.00 2511.501 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS II CUYD $40.00 340 $13.600.00 340 $13,600.00 2511.501 RANDOM RIP RAP ClASS Ul CUYD $50,00 2925 $146.200.00 2684 $134.200.00 2., $12,050.00 2511.501 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS N CUYD $60.00 970 $66.200.00 970 $66.200.00 2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SOFT $3.25 42626 $'36,634.00 21162 $68,841.60 16503 $63.634.76 2553 $6,291.26 "8 $2.6&8.&0 1570 $&,102.60 2521.501 6" CONCRETE WAlK sa FT $4.00 293 $1.172.00 195 $780.00 56 $224 .00 .2 $'66.00 2521.511 2" BITUMINOUS WAlK sa FT $3.00 181651 $844.983.00 63280 $189,840.00 111621 $334.863.00 6750 $20.200.00 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN 6412 lINFT $11.00 330 $3.630.00 125 $1.375.00 125 $1.37&.00 40 ~O.OO 40 $440.00 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN 8424 L1NFT $9.00 ,- $143.082.00 8823 $79.407.00 437 $3.933.00 4164 $37 ~76.oo 734 $7.'''.00 486 $4.374.00 710 $6.390.00 .84 $4.361.00 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN 8612 UN FT $11.00 1042 $"~2.oo 497 $6~67.00 497 $6~7.oo 24 $264.00 2. $264.00 2531.501 CONCRETE CUR8 & GUTTER DESIGN 8618 UN FT $12.00 306 $3,672,00 153 $1.636.00 153 $' ,636.00 2531.501 CONCRETE CURS & GUTTER DESIGN 8624- LlNFT $9.00 1268<1 $113.220.00 6290 $66.610.00 6290 $66.610.00 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN 5512 UN FT $12.00 .04 $6,048.00 252 $3.024.00 252 $3.024.00 2531.507 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT saye $40,00 712 $26,480.00 657 $26,280.00 55 $2.200.00 2531.602 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP EACH $500.00 .3 $26,600.00 , 64.000.00 .2 $21.000.00 3 $1,500.00 2351.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SOFT $45.00 4" $20.020.00 92 $4. '40.00 364 $16.360.00 2533.504- CONCRETE MEDIAN BARRIER DESIGN 8337 UNFT $10.00 2046 $20......00 2048 $2O~80.00 2540.602 MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH $150.00 .9 $6.600.00 59 $6,seo.oo 2545.602 INSTAll L1GH! POLE EACH $500,00 , $600.00 1 $600.00 255Hi01 TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN BS33S UN FT $20.00 417 $6,340.00 417 $6.340.00 2554,509 GUIDE POST TYPE B EACH $35,00 ,. $626.00 15 $626 .00 2554.521 ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLY - PLATE BEAM EACH $350.00 6 $2,100.00 6 $2.100.00 2554.523 END TREATMENT. ECCENTRIC LOADER BCT EACH $1.700,00 6 $10,200.00 6 $10.200.00 2554.602 IMPACT A TTENUA TOR BARRELS EACH $250.00 60 $'..000.00 36 $9.000.00 24 $6.000.00 2557.501 WIRE FENCE DESIGN 6l).9322 UN FT $12.00 1966 $23,616.00 1968 $23.616.00 2557,501 WIRE FENCE DESIGN 60V-9322 UNFT $12,00 79 $S4S.OO 79 $S4S.00 2563,601 DETOUR SIGNING LUMP SUM $5.000.00 1 $6.000.00 1 $6.000.00 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL STAGE 1 LUMP SUM $50,000,00 , $00.000.00 D':!' $47,&00.00 0.05 $2,500.00 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL STAGE 2 LUMP SUM $20,000.00 1 $20.000.00 OT, $19.000.00 0,05 $1,000.00 2563,601 TRAFFIC CONTROL STAGE 3 LUMP SUM $15,000,00 1 $16.000.00 ,y $14.200.00 0.05 $760.00 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL STAGE 4 LUMP SUM $10.000.00 1 $10.llClO.00 'J9" $6.600.00 005 $000.00 2564.531 SIGN PANELS TYPE C sa FT $25.00 1241 $31,026.00 1061 $26.626.00 69 $1.726.00 111 $2.776.00 2564,531 SIGN PANelS TYPE D SO FT $100,00 ." $51.100.00 511 $61.100.00 2564.1:;02 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LEFT ARROW) PAINT EACH $125,00 37 $U26.00 30 $3.7.0.00 2 $200.00 5 $62&.00 2564.602 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (L T ARROW) PREFORMED THERMOPlASTIC EACH $325.00 63 $26,17&.00 76 $24.700.00 2 $860.00 5 $1.626.00 2564.602 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (L T - THRU ARROW) PREFORMED THERMOPL EACH $500.00 1 $600.00 1 _.00 2564,602 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (RIGHT ARROW) PAINT EACH $125,00 21 $2.62&.00 17 $2.126.00 2 $260.00 2 $2&0.00 2564.602 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (RT ARROW) PREFORMED THERMOPLASTIC EACH $325.00 37 $12,02&.00 36 $11.37&.00 2 _.00 2564 ,602 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (RT- THRU ARROW) PREFORMED THERMOPL EACH $500.00 2 $1,000.00 2 $1.000.00 2564.602 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (SCHOOL XING) PERFORMED THERMOPLAS EACH $500.00 2 $1,000.00 2 $' .000.00 2564,603 4- BROKEN LINE WHITE. EPOXY L1N FT $0,40 1744 $697.60 1151 $460.40 471 $188.40 122 646.80 2564.603 4" BROKEN LINE YELLOW - EPOXY L1NFT $0.40 1984 $181.60 1954 $781.60 2564.603 4- DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW - EPOXY UN FT $0,90 16302 $14.671.80 13077 $11,769.30 1659 $1,4i3.10 1566 $1,409.40 2564.603 48 DOUBLE SOLID LINE YEllOW - PAINT UNFT $0.50 26937 $13~66.00 22477 $11.236.00 2116 $1.0&8.00 234. $1.172.00 2564.603 4" SOLID LINE WHITE. EPOXY lINFT $0.40 37439 $14,978.60 3464' $13.869.60 1269 s007.60 1521 $60UO 2564.603 4" SOLID LINE WHITE - PAINT lIN FT $0,25 269&0 $6.737.00 22484 $6.621.00 2119 $&29.7!I 2347 $&86.7& 2564.603 4" SOLID LINE YELLOW. EPOXY LlNFT $0.75 6978 $6,733.00 8978 $6,733.00 2564.603 4- SOLID LINE YELLOW. PAINT LlN FT $0.25 271&6 $6,789.00 22738 $6,684.00 2155 $&38.7& 2263 $666.7!I 2564.603 S" BROKEN LINE WHITE - EPOXY lINFT $7.00 166 $1.092.00 156 $1.092.00 2564.603 24" SOLID LINE WHITE. PAINT lINFT $7.00 '63 $1.261.00 80 $680.00 5. $378.00 ., $343.00 2564.603 24" SOLID LINE YELLOW - EPOXY UNFT $5.00 888 $4.440.00 207 $1.036.00 461 $2.30&.00 220 $'.'00.00 2564.603 24" SOLID LINE WHITE - PREFORMED THERMOPlASTIC lINFT $6,00 181 $1.086.00 181 $1.088.00 2564.603 248 SOLID LINE YELLOW. PREFORMED THERMOPlASTIC UN FT $6.00 '296 $7.770.00 1295 $7.770.00 25&t-.61S ZEBRA CROSSWAlK- WHITE PREFORMED THERMOPlASTIC sa FT $10.00 11&2 $11,&20.00 1152 $11,e20.QO 40F a EXHIBIT A 60% ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ANOKA COUNTY C.S.A.H. 14 RECONSTRUCTION DATE PRINTED: 10I4l2OO6 C.SA.H. 14 RECONSTRUCTION UNIT TOTAL PROJECT SP.024i1...2-io C.SA.H.14 C.SA-H.54 C.SA.H.21 S.P. 21~02o.005 S.P. 02-654-001 S.P. 02-621~009 NON-PARTICIPATING ANOKA COUNTY CITY OF LINO LAKES CITY OF CENTERVlLLE ANOKA COUNTY CtTY OF CENTER\II.LE .MICKA COUNTY CITY OF CENTERVLLE ANOKA COUNTY CITY OF L1NO LAKES CITY OF CENTERVlLLE ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST QUANTITIES COST ROADWAY ROADWAY ROK)WAY RON:INAY RO/IDWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY STORM OUANTIT1ES SEGMENT QUANTITES SEGMENT ~TJTIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT OUANTITES SEGtoENT Ql.IANTITIES SEGMENT otJANTlTIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT QUANTITIES SEGMENT ESTlMTE ESTIMATE ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTNATEO COST ESTIMA.TEO COST ESTtMATED COST ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED COST 2565.511 FULL TACT T CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM BIG SYS $180,000.00 1 $180,000.00 0.5 $90.000.00 0.25 $4&.000.00 0.25 $45,000.00 2565.602 PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTION AND SIGN EACH $3.750.00 2 $7,&00.00 2 $7 ,&00.00 2565.602 PVC HANDHOLE (METAL FRAME AND COVER) EACH $850.00 8 $6.800.00 , $6.800.00 2565.603 2 INCH NON-METALLIC CONDUIT UNFT $6,00 800 $4.&00.00 eoo $4.800.00 2565.603 4 INCH NON-METAlLIC CONDUIT UNFT $8,00 200 $1.600.00 200 $1.600.00 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MACHINE SLICED UN FT $2.50 18000 $46.000.00 18000 $4&.000.00 2573.505 FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN TYPE STILL WATER lINFT $12.00 84. $10.116.00 ." $10.116.00 2573.505 FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN TYPE MOVING WATER lINFT $15.00 7&0 $11.2&0.00 750 $11.280.00 2573.601 EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR LUMP SUM $10.000,00 , $10.000.00 1 $10.000.00 2573.602 INLET PROTECTION EACH $300.00 23& $70.&00.00 235 $70.&00.00 2573.603 BIOROLL lINFT $10.00 1&00 $1&.000.00 1500 $1&.000.00 2575.501 SEEDING (P) ACRE $250.00 38.T ,",67&.00 35,5 ,",&7&.00 '5 $3T&.OO 17 $42&.00 2575,505 SODDING TYPE LAWN SaYD $2,25 46107 $103.7010.76 42063 ....1141.7& 3198 $7.196.&0 646 $1.90'.80 2575.511 MULCH MATERIAl. TYPE 3 TON $200,00 n.. $1&.480.00 71 $14.200.00 , $llOO.oo ,.4 S680.00 2575.519 DISK ANCHORING (P) ACRE $150.00 38.7 $6.80&.00 35.5 $6.'2&.00 1.5 $22!.00 1.7 $2&&,00 2575.523 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 SOVC $1.25 ...9281 $&1.601,26 45293 $66,61626 1600 $2.000.00 2388 $2.'&&.00 2575.523 EROSION CONTROL BlANKETS CATEGORY 4 SaYD $1.50 4840 $7,2<0,00 .640 $7.2<0.00 2575,532 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER ANALYSIS 22-5-10 POUND $0,50 1&480 $7.740.00 14200 $7.100.00 600 $300.00 660 $340.00 2575.608 SEEDING. MIXTURE 310 POUND $30,00 82 $2.480.00 " $2.4&0.00 2575.608 SEEDING. MIXTURE 350 POUND $35.00 .1&3 $110.3156.00 2882 $100.870.00 121 $4.44&.00 144 $6,....00 STREETSCAP1NG LS $500,000.00 1 $llOO.ooo.oo 1 $llOO.OOD.OO SUBTOTALS $1....230.856.10 9.869.167.90 "'84.7&1.00 _.080.2& 440,764.86 $32,993.00 .06.....80 $43.148.60 , ,3&8.844.00 30,122.00 16.600.00 670.97&.00 TOTALS $14,230,856.10 9,869,167.90 "'84,761,00 _.0&0.2& 440.7&4.86 $32.993.00 "'06.449.60 $43,1"'8,60 1.368......00 30.122.00 16.600,00 670.976.00 Fuming Gnlup: Qroup 1 Gnlup 2 Qroup 3 Qroup 4 Group 5 Group 8 Group 7 Group 8 Group D Group 10 Group 11 ToIlls: $14.230.856.10 $9,859.157.90 $484,751.00 $888.050.25 $440.784.85 $32.993.00 $408,449.60 $43.148.50 $1,358.844.00 $30.122.00 $15.600.00 $870.975.00 ToIal Federal EUglbIe Items: $13.514.159.10 $9.859.157.90 $484,751.00 $888.050.25 $440.784.85 $32.993.00 $405.449.80 $43,148.50 $1.358,844.00 Federal Funde Available: $8.523.550.00 $4,759.209.14 $233.998.83 $428.679.30 $212.785.85 $15,926.37 $198.201.20 $20.828.63 $655.940.68 % Federal Funding 48.27% Rounded to: $4.759.210.00 $234,000,00 $428,880.00 $212.770.00 $15.930.00 $196.200.00 $20.830.00 $6&5.930.00 SP 02-614-24 (RECONSTRUCTION OF CSAH 14 MAIN STREET) FROM 1-35E TO 1-35W\. FUNDING SPLITS ANOKA ANOKA ANOKA CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF LINO CITY OF UNO CITY OF LINO PROJECT ANOKA COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY STATE COUNTY CENTERVILLE CENTERVILLE CENTERVlLLE CITY OF UNO LAKES LAKES STATE LAKES LOCAL TOTALS TOTALS FEDERAL F~~~~L LAKES TOTALS FEDERAL .'INn" AID FUNDS LOCAL FUNDS TOTALS LOCAL FUNDS F'lNM AID FUNDS FUNDS ROADWAY $12,872,012.10 510,7:1e,494.35 $5.168,180.00 $5.538.192.35 $30,122.00 $1.635.166.75 $485.440.00 $1.169,726.75 $500.351.00 $234,000.00 $250.761.00 $15.600.00 DRAINAGE (55% County, 7% LINO LAKES. :Ie% $1,358.844.00 $747.364.20 $380.761.50 $386.802.70 $516,380.72 $249.253.40 $267.107.32 $95,119,08 $45.915.10 $49.203.95 SIGNAL CABINET A 100% County) $15.000,00 $15,000.00 $15.000.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $14.245.856.10 $11.498.858.55 $5,528.941.50 $5.939,795.05 530.122.00 $2,151.527.47 $714.693.40 $l,4:1e,834.D7 $595.470.08 $279.915.10 $298.954.95 $15.600.00 8% CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING $1.139.668.49 $919,908.88 $917.498.92 $2.408.76 $172.122.20 $172,122.20 $47,637.61 $46,389.61 $1,246.00 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $15.395,524.59 $12,418.767.23 $5.528.941.50 $6,857.293.97 $32.531.76 $2,323,649,67 $714.693.40 $1,808,968.27 $643.107.69 $279,915,10 $346,344.69 $16,848.00 Percentage of Total Construction Cost eo,72'IL $l.808,956.27IPayable to Anoka County from CENTERVILLE $363,192.89 PIYlbIe to Anoke County from LINO LAKES ITEMS IN RED WERE CHANGED FROM PREVIOUS VERSION 15,10" ....1ft. e OF6 COUNTY OF ANOKA Public Services Division HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD. NW, ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 (763) 862-4200 FAX (763) 862-4201 Douglas W. Fischer P.E., County Engineer August 11, 2006 Dallas Larson City Administrator City of Centerville 1880 Main Street, Centerville, MN 55038 Dear Mr. Larson: We have reviewed the City's comments to the draft joint powers agreement (JPA) for the CSAH 14 reconstruction project (SP 02-614-24). Following is a response to each concern you raised in your August 11, 2006 letter as well as a response to proposed revisions you highlighted in the JP A itselfthat was not mentioned in your letter. 1) The first item and perhaps of greatest concern is the inclusion of storm drainage system costs in the JP A. The memorandum of agreement did not include this item and the cost estimate didn't give a hint that you might be looking for participation. This recent addition represents almost 60% of the MOU estimate of City share. We cannot accept this afterthought. It is outrageous to expect to now allocate these costs-we will not pay for drainage system costs. Response: The cost split shown in the joint powers agreement is based on our standard cost share policy. The MOD did in fact estimate a City cost share at 20% that was an assumption made at a 30% design level. The 38% in the JP A is a refined number based on a detailed design level. The spreadsheet used to calculate the split is attached for your information. 2) We have inserted on Page 4 the same language that was in the MOU that indicates Anoka County's intention to secure reimbursement for the trail costs from Metro Parks Trail Program. Response: We have added the language from the MOD and clarified that the potential reimbursement is limited to 50% of the local match. Page 1 of 5 3) We deleted city participation in the mobilization andfield office. These items were not contemplated by the MOU and infact were specifically allocated to the County in Exhibit C of the MOU Response: We have modified the cost split for mobilization and field office such that the City will only be responsible for its share of these items for work that is not eligible for federal funding such as streetscaping and new water and sewer construction. 4) We deleted city participation in traffic control for the same reason as mobilization. Response: We have modified the cost split for traffic control such that the City will only be responsible for its share of this item for work that is not eligible for federal funding such as streetscaping and new water and sewer construction. 5) We have inserted language that says that the value of City contributed land or easements in excess of remnant property purchased by the City, will be applied to the city share of the project cost. Response: We have added section "IX. RIGHT OF WAY" to the IPA with the wording from the MOD. 6) Because the City's share is so high, we have offered an alternative schedule for payment of the City's share. Response: The IP A has been modified to incorporate the requested alternative payment schedule. 7) We deleted the engineering reimbursement for considering alternative designs on CSAH 54. If you expected to be reimbursed, you should have indicated that at the time those discussions were taking place. Response: All revisions to CSAH 54 have been discussed at the Project Management Team meetings. The design iterations on the west side were a direct result of the office park development there and on the east side were a direct result of the proposed Northern Lights Boulevard. Both required changes from the MOD Exhibit A layout and are City costs. 8) We inserted in section V B that the City would receive credits of $300,000 and $150,000 for providing alternative pond locations (andfor efficiencies created by construction of "Backage Road") The changes to pond locations only happened because of the City's insistence, thus saving the county at least double the proposed credit. Response: Item III. B. 4. has been deleted from the IPA. The County will pay for all design costs to relocate the ponds from the north side of CSAH 14 (Rehbein property). We thank the City for being a good project partner and recommending this design but cannot credit the City Page 2 of 5 any funding for this. The new pond locations save on land cost but are more expensive to construct and require CD 55 to be piped. The redesign is one of the reasons the project has been delayed. Hopefully without the ponds on the north side of CSAH 14, the City will be able to generate more tax base. CSAH 14 will be constructed under traffic and will not detour onto the backage road (Northern Lights Blvd). The County has no funds to credit the City for constructing the backage road. 9) You have the City involved in providing the power source for the traffic signal (Item IX). This was not mentioned in the MOU, infact the MOU Exhibit D stated that all traffic signal costs in cities under 5000 population would be County responsibility. Since all legs of the intersecting roadways are County, there is no reason for the city to be involved This is a County expense. Response: It is standard County policy for Cities to provide for power for signals regardless of City population. 10) Item X Maintenance provides that the storm sewers are the maintenance responsibility of the City. Nowhere in the MOU was this indicated and in all afthe meetings we had, this was never mentioned I do remember you stating that the City would be asked to maintain the grit chambers but this was because you didn't have vactor equipment. We have deleted reference to the City maintaining the storm sewer system and ponds. Response: It is standard County policy for Cities to be responsible for storm sewer trunkline, ponding, grit chamber and outlet structure maintenance. The MOD is not intended to outline all maintenance responsibilities. The MOD states this would be formalized in the lP A. Other Items Redlined in the lP A: 11) The City requested copies of updated spreadsheets showing calculations of cost share. Response: The 60% plans submitted to the City show the design details of the project used to generate the lP A. The Exhibit A attached to the lP A shows the cost splits. The drainage cost split table is attached. 12) The City added language to 11 METHOD concerning calling of bids responsibility. Response: The language has been added. 13) Item III A. 1. was deleted as duplicate. Response: Item deleted. 14) The City added language to Item III A. 3a. (formerly 4a.) concerning its right to take recourse for deficiencies associated with relocation and reconstruction of its utilities. Page 3 of 5 Response: The language has been added with the exception of "or other party". 15) The City requested a definition of the term "non-eligible" in item IIlA.4 (formerly 5) concerning storm sewer. Response: Non-eligible means not eligible for State Aid funding. And to further clarify, non- participating means not eligible for Federal funding. 16) The City added" as requested by the City" to item IlIA. 9. concerning driveways. Response: The language has been added. Concrete aprons have also been included as stated in the MOD. 17) The City changed the language of item IlIA. 1 O. concerning driveways to match the MOU Response: The language has been revised to match the MOO. 18) The City changed "City" to "County" in item IlIA. 16. (formerly 17) concerning EVP costs. Response: The language has not been revised. It is standard County policy for Cities to pay for EVP. 19) The City added language to item VIII TERMINATION concerning payment of its share of project costs if upon termination of the agreement. Response: The language has not been revised. It is not necessary to revise the language. 20) The City added language to item XIV(formerly XII). ENTIRE AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT OF A WRITING concerning superceding ofprevious agreements. Response: The language has been revised to add MOD references. Other Revisions made to lP A: 21) Former Item III A.14. concerning street lighting has been deleted as street lighting is included with the streetscaping for this project 22) Items IILA.8. and 8a. concerning steetscaping have been added to clarify responsibilities for construction observation and deficiencies. A redlined version of the revised lP A is attached highlighting the changes that have been made. A new Exhibit A and the drainage cost split calculations are also attached. Page 4 of5 Please feel free to call me at 763-862-4213 or Lyndon Robjent at 763-862-4237 with any questions you may have. Sincerely Douglas W. Fischer P.E. County Engineer Encs. Cc: Rhonda Sivarajah, County Commissioner Mary Capra, Mayor of Centerville Lyndon Robjent, Assistant County Engineer Page 5 of 5 Anoka County Contract NO.2006-0558 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 14 (MAIN STREET) FROM l-35W to 1-35 (COUNTY PROJECT NO. 02-614-24) This Agreement made and entered into this day of of Anoka, State of Minnesota, a political subdivision of the Avenue North, Anoka, Minnesota 55303, hereinafter ref err Centerville, 1880 Main Street, Centerville, MN 55038, herei the County 2100 Third the City of 'City". WHEREAS, the parties of this agreement ha condition and traffic capacity of County State WHEREAS, the parties of this agr State Aid Highway No. 14 (Main safety ofthe intersections incl WHEREAS, the parties Highway 14 (Main Street sewer system and other ut desirable to construct a new Aid Highway 54 (20th Avenue sirable to construct conduit and for possible future signalization: WHERE Highwa funds through the Surface Transportation Program (Main Street); and, hat t e County shall cause the construction of County State Aid WHERE the impr 13 whic a ounty Highway Department has prepared plans and specifications for County State Aid Highway 14 (Main Street) under Project No. S.P. 02-614- specifications are on file in the office of the County Engineer; and, e parties have an existing Memorandum of Understanding ("MOD") dated 3,2005, regarding said project; and, Anoka County Contract No.2006-0558 WHEREAS, the parties agree that any extra work performed beyond that shown in th lans as bid shall be the responsibility of the requested party; and, WHEREAS, the parties agree that it is in. their best interest that the cost of said shared; and, WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 471.59 authorizes political subdivisio joint powers agreements for the joint exercise of powers common t NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY STIPULATED I. PURPOSE The parties have joined together for the trail/concrete sidewalk, streetscape, drainage, portions of County State Aid Highway No. specifications numbered S.P. 02-614-24 on Department (hereinafter collective rred t , bituminous utilities on e plans and ty Highway II. contracted, the cost of all labor, required to complete the work, shall referred to herein. "Estimated" costs are incurred for the Project. Actual costs may vary t parties will be responsible. e project (including County furnished materials) is e for the Project are capped at $6,523,550.00. The d e ratio of eligible cost incurred by each party to the total osts are the costs of items that can participate in federal funding ation in the construction costs is as follows: The City shall pay one hundred percent (100%) of the hydrant and curb box relocation and gate box adjustment as well as water and sewer relocation and construction. The estimated City cost of these items is $397,050.00. 2 Deleted: The City shall provide constmction observation for the relocation and reconstruction of their utilities and approve for acceptance the work as it is Formatted: Bullets and Anoka County Contract No.2006-0558 L--The City shall furnish and deliver to the construction site replacement hydrants for any hydrants, which are being relocated as a pa of this project, which they want replaced. 1-- The City shall provide construction observation for t reconstruction of their utilities and approve for accept completed. ,Ja. The City shall be responsible for any detk ----------------- relocation and reconstruction of the utilities th completion of the Project but retains its right contractor or subcontractor for lleolioence mi malfeasance. or any issue arisino outs'. e of a participating. a percentage torm sewer , manholes, ponds and d a portion fined in the t ~et:'Ye~ lhe_ Ci!y ~n~ C...9u.!lty_ by the product of contributing tage of contributing flow from al eligible estimated cost of the estimated cost to the City is imated cost of the storm sewer is $0.00 of which 0.00 (100%). fly percent (50%) of the cost of concrete curb and. n curb and gutter) in Centerville. The estimated total urb d gutter including medians is $281,114.00, of which the imated cost is $115,222.00. Th lty shall pay one hundred percent (100%) of the cost of decorative median above the cost of concrete median. The City's estimated cost for decorative median is $0.00. The City shall pay one hundred percent (100%) of the cost of streetscape items including but not limited to: median plantings, trees, tree grates, street lights, stamped concrete and other aesthetic treatments the City 3 Deleted: 4 ,......._.....__.______________________________mm...mmm...............___________________.__.__m.... -l Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Deleted: 5 Deleted: 5 Deleted: 5 Formatted: Bullets and Anoka County Contract No.2006-0558 chooses to include with the Project. The streetscape items shall be designed by a licensed landscape architect and meet the Anok Highway Department Landscape/Streetscape Guidelines. estimated cost for streetscape items is $500,000.00. 8. The Cit 'shall Irovide construction observation for tl ::;Jr.9~t::;gll?\LjJ~m::;.Im~:L:,J,PPLQv(;ioril-"g9.pJ.'1..!l9..~ the w ~'!) 9. The City shall pay on concrete includin" concr for all upgraded drivew cost for driveway pave 10. the County at no cost to the ent (100%) of the cost of new des pavement, aggregate base, soil fill and geotextile fabric if applicable) nt work necessary to construct the trail as well as ences that are required due to the trail that would he trail. The City's estimated cost for the trail is ~ounty a~~L..t('Lj!lll2LL for funditH! th~!ugh the il Metro Parks Trail Program for u to finy . ercent st of the local match for the trail construction for ossib1e ment to the City after construction. The local match is estimated 75.40 of which $125387.70 will be a). lied for under the Metro rIl!L..P.!:.9gn:tI:n,/\nQli'!J;Qtdl.]ty,!gr~9.::;mt.9pJ'!9.~Jhi~x~jrDPllI~gillgIE among the County's list of priorities for fundinQ in the first biennium of the capital improvement plan to be funded from the Metropolitan Regional Parks Capital Improvement Program. County statT will do everythinQ within its power to secure such funding including pursuing special ~!l?I?I.9..P.Ji ati O!l~..J'!:"Q)l~Jh~!~g[::;.L'!.t..lJ..r9.jf..i..L?.pp..~'!r'i..f~i!l?.ilik 4 Formatted Formatted Deleted: 6.345.00 ...! Deleted: Any in place driveway ~ pavement disrupted by the construction . WIll be replaced Anoka County Contract NO.2006-0558 ~As the City of Centerville has a population of less than 5000 City shall pay zero percent (0%) of the cost of co installation of the whole traffic actuated signal syst (including County supplied materials). ~The County shall pay one hundred percent costs. ~ The City shall pay one hundred perc Pre-emption (EVP) costs. The City' (Not in cost estimate at this time) 1L- The City shall pay their s non-participating items, $35.750.00, atina Construction Utilities 2 Grading, B 3 Storm S 4 Dete Sewe 5 Conc 6 Deco 7 S tree 8 Driv 9 Conc 10 Trail 11 Stree 12 Traffi 13 EVP 14 Mobi 15 Traf Total Cost Esti City Total Total .25 484,777.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $}5-J5.!ULO.. $4.750.00 Construction $,J,JjtJ.ll-,iZ_ al Funds available to the$.714.693:40 $.1.436:834.07 $.1,436,834.07 s Federal Funds nstruction Cost to City 5 / Deleted: The City shall pay one hundred percent (100%) of the cost of any street lighting included in the project. The design and installation of ornamental streetlights shall be in accordance with the County's specifications. The City's estimated cost for street lighting is $ 0.00. Formatted: Bullets and Deleted: as detennined Deleted: 85,800.00 ,) Deleted: as detennined by Mn/DOT IS ..~ Deleted: 6,345.00 Deleted: 85,800.00 Deleted: 11,400.00 Deleted: 2,245,352.47 Deleted: 759,985.20 : Deleted: 1,485,367.27 Deleted: 1,485,367.27 Anoka County Contract No.2006-0558 The total estimated construction cost to the City (less Federal Funds) for the $.,ldlgJni.Ol a~ s.ho~n -,?n Jh~ a!!.acJ1e~ E.~hj!:>i~, 1\ a,!d !:3. ],h.~ ~it),P'!l1i~ip~ti~n . engineering will be at a rate of eight percent (8%) of their designated share. to the City for construction engineering is $172_122.20~m The grand total cost to the City for the Project is $ $1 ,608.956.27~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Upon final completion of the project, based upon actual construction costs. If neces (95%) charged will be made in the form of cre the remaining five percent (5%) of the City's p cost will be five percent share. Also, paid. B. Design The City shall be r requested following the a changes/additions have be of CSAH 14 using a rural ide ofCSAH 54. The City's hem Lights Blvd south of r this design is $5,200.00 The City's computations to relocate two ponds on north perty) to south side ofCSAH 14. The design cost Ich the City's cost is $0.00. County, 18,550.0 engineer' tract, the City shall pay to the County, upon written demand by the rce (100%) of its portion of the design cost of the project estimated at $ ty's share of the design cost of the project shall include only design e and does not include administrative expenses incurred by the County. 6 Deleted: 1,485,367.27 --' Deleted: 179,628.20 ." Deleted: 1,664,995.47 Deleted: five Deleted: 9 5 Deleted: 1,581,745.69 Anoka County Contract No.2006-0558 This Agreement shall continue until terminated as provided hereinafter. V. DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS All funds disbursed by the County or City pursuant to this Agreement shall be entity pursuant to the method provided by law. VI. CONTRACTS AND PURCHASES All contracts let and purchases made pursuant to this Agreement conformance to the State laws. VII. STRICT ACCOUNTABILITY A strict accounting shall be made of all funds and be made upon request by either party. VIII. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated b less than thirty (30) days writte notice is delivered by mail, it termination shall not be ef services or goods which 0 rata share of costs which t se, upon not er party. If iling. Such urchases of I pay its pro pense, install or cause the installation of an adequate electrical cabinet for the intersection of Main Street and CSAH 54 (20th g essary extension of power lines. The City shall be the lead agency completion of said traffic control signal installation, the ongoing cost of the he signal shall be the sole cost and expense of the City. 7 Formatted: Bullets and <. Formatted: Bullets and Numbering --: Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Anoka County Contract No.2006-0558 1. Maintenance of the completed watermain, sanitary sewer, storm sewer (except catch basins and catch basin leads), detention basins (including ponds and th outlet structures and any grit chambers and/or collectors) shall be the sole obli of the City. 6. the sole 2. Maintenance of all trails and sidewalks, including snow plowi responsibility of the City. 3. Maintenance of streetlights and cost of electrical power sole obligation of the City. 4. The City shall be responsible to maintain all st Project. Maintenance shall be performed in a Highway Department landscape/Streetsca e Gui 5. Maintenance of the completed obligation of the County. 7. Any 8. minaries, luminaire relamping, completed by the County. The City asis for all incurred costs. led on and used only by Emergency Vehicles med in Minnesota Statutes 9169.01, Subdivision 5, rovide a list to the County Engineer, or the County's e, of all such vehicles with emitter units on an annual EVP Systems shall be immediately reported to the County. of said EVP Systems shall be determined by the County. ent said EVP Systems or components are, in the opinion ofthe County, being ed, or the conditions set forth are violated, and such misuse or violation ntinues after receipt by the City, written notice thereof from the County, the County shall remove the EVP Systems. Upon removal of the EVP Systems pursuant to this 8 Anoka County Contract No.2006-0558 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have hereunto set their hands on the dates written below. COUNTYOFANOKA CITY OF CENTERVI By: Margaret Langfeld, Chair Anoka County Board of Commissioners Dated: ATTEST By: Dated: By: By: By: Kurt Glascl; City Attorney Dated: 10 Deleted: James Hoeft Anoka County Contract NO.2006-0558 paragraph, the field wiring, cabinet wiring, detector receiver, infrared detector heads and indicator lamps and all other components shall become the prope of the County. XU. NOTICE For purposes of delivery of any notices hereunder, the notice shall be e County Administrator of Anoka County 2100 Third Avenue North, behalf of the County, and the City of Centerville, 1880 Main behalf of the City XHl. INDEMNIFICATION The City and the County mutually agree to inde claims, losses, costs, expenses or damages resu officers, agents, or employees relating to a Agreement. It is understood and agreed t this Agreement supersedes the subject matter thereo parties to the subject ma ~:1c;lrLQE.tl}9.Jlm of 1 e.!:~I alterations, v or when they du ein and that s relating to between the lade to the m_,~~lQ';;. Any all be valid only 9 ..t Formatted: Bullets and Numbering "'l~()rllliltt!~:_B_ul!~~i1ndfljurTlb!r!':l~m.. j Formatted: Bullets and S.P. 02-614-24 EXHIBIT B COST-SHARING AGREEMENT FOR PROJECTS CONSTRUCTED IN ANOKA COUNTY USING COUNTY STATE AID FUNDS OR LOCAL TAX LEVY DOLLARS ITEMS COUNTY SHARE o CITY SHARE 100% 50% 100% Bikeways Concrete Curb & Gutter Concrete Sidewalk Concrete Sidewalk Replacement Concrete Curb & Gutter for Median Construction Concrete Median Construction or Adjustment of Local Utilities Grading, Base and Bituminous Storm Sewer Driveway Upgrades Traffic Signals (communities larger than 5,000) 50% o 100% 100% 100% o o O*@ o 100% 100% based on state aid letter*@ 0*1 o based on state aid letter*@ 100% '12 the cost of its legs of the intersection the cost of its legs of the intersection plus '12 the cost of the County legs of the intersection Traffic Signals (communities less than 5,000) Engineering Services Right-of-Way Street Lights O*TM 100% *2: 100% *2: 0*( 100% o *@ The County pays for 100% OF A Standard Median Design such as plain concrete. If a local unit of government requests decorative median such as red brick, stamped concrete, or exposed aggregate concrete, the local unit will pay the additional cost above the cost of standard median. *@ In the event no State Aid is being used, or in the event the state aid letter does not determine cost split percentages, drainage cost shares will be computed by the proportion of contributing flow outside the County right of way to the total contributing flow. *TM In cities less than 5,000 people the County pays for 100% of the cost of the traffic signal effective March 1986. The County collects on behalf of the cities (less than 5,000) "Municipal State Aid Dollars" since they do not themselves qualify for state aid funds. These funds are used to pay the City Share. *2: Engineering shall be paid by the Lead Agency except that any participating agency will pay construction engineering in the amount of 8% of the construction costs paid by that agency. *( In the event that the Township or City requests purchase of right-of-way in excess of those right-of-ways required by County construction, the Township or City participates to the extent an agreement can be reached in these properties. For instance, a Township or City may request a sidewalk be constructed alongside a County roadway which would require additional right-of-way, in which case the Township or City may pay for that portion of the right-of-way. Acquisition of right-of-way for new alignments shall be the responsibility of the Township or City in which the alignment is located. This provision may be waived by agreement with the County Board if the roadway replaces an existing alignment and the local unit of government takes jurisdiction of that existing alignment. In addition, any costs, including right-of-way costs, incurred by the County because a Township or City did not acquire sufficient right-of-way during the platting process or redevelopment process shall be paid by the Township or City. *1 The County will replace all driveways in-kind. Upgrades in surfacing (Le., gravel to bituminous, bituminous to concrete shall be at 100% expense to the Township or City).