The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2001-11-28 CC COUNCIL MEETING WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2001 6:30 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER L Roll Call n. SET AGENDA III. PUBLIC HEARING(S) IV. APPEARANCES/A WARDS V. CONSIDERA TION OF MINUTES 1. November 14,2001 Council Meeting Minutes VI. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS VII. OLD BUSINESS 1. Budget/Deferred Comp.lUnion Contract (Update) 2. Vineo Overages (Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park) 3. Holiday Party (Update) 4. Gassen Companies - Street Lights (Eagle Pass Townhouses) VIII. NEW BUSINESS 1. 2002 Levy 2. Mr. Tedd Peterson, Public Works - Successful Completion of Year Two (2) of Employment _ J. ~ 3. Centerville Elementary Certificate of Recognition ~',.~ 4. Feasibility Study - Watermain Extension (The Shores) -c#~ , d. -f/~ 5. 1798 Main Str~ - Mill ~d Extension Vacation ~'1 J.."..wJ j:,,;t'i~CP-~~ p,JJW '~+~J,.,.~". 'bw. ~~. IX. CONSENT AGENDA ~ ~. ~l4 J 1~ '-Iv }v.()/- J ~. City of Centenrille November 15, through November 28,2001 Expenditures /":JJJl' 2. Centennial Fire District Expenditures ()1" 3. Pay Request #1 - Pheasant Marsh (Park Construction-$290,528.53) X. COMMITTEE REPORTS XI. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT L 20th Avenue Buildi?g - (, ('''5 -f-- CJ a..~ Co;\.CII e,+e., XII. ADJOURNMENT 4 CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER14,2001 6:30 p.m. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on November 14, 2001, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Mayor Tim Swedberg Council Member Dick Travis Council Member Mary Capra Council Member Mari Nelson Council Member Linda Broussard Vickers ABSENT: None. STAFF: City Administrator Ms. Moore-Sykes City Engineer, Tom Peterson City Attorney Hoeft Public Works Director Palzer I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Swedberg called the November 14,2001, City Council meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. II. SET AGENDA Council Member Capra requested that the Communications Task Force presentation be moved to Item 3 under Appearances. Motion by Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Broussard Vickers to approve the agenda as amended. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. III. PUBLIC HEARING (8) 1. Ordinance #4 Amendments (Continued from Planning and Zoning) Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she would like to wait to hold the public hearings until Mr. Palzer arrived at the meeting because there was confusion at the Planning and Zoning Commission level and Mr. Palzer's interpretation is necessary. Page 1 of 25 Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the Planning and Zoning Commission had received the large draft but not the accompanying list to be able to go through and verify wording. She also noted that the document received did not differentiate the changes made and was not clear. Mayor Swedberg re-opened the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that there is a list of revisions and changes to Ordinance #4 and the list was retyped by the clerk from notes made by Mr. Palzer. Council Member Nelson asked ifthere was a motion from the Planning and Zoning Commission and, if so, what the motion was. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the Planning and Zoning Commission had not made a final recommendation on the matter due to the confusion with the documents provided to the Commission. Mr. Palzer indicated that the changes to Ordinance #4 were housekeeping items and Staff went through and made the changes and then provided a revised Ordinance #4 to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the draft copy of the Ordinance had not marked the changes and it was difficult to determine whether the changes as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Committee had been made. Mr. Palzer indicated that some of the residents in attendance had an issue concerning C-l zoning. He then indicated that C-l zoning is not referenced in the Comprehensive Plan or in Ordinance #4 and that is why Staff was going to eliminate it. He then indicated that the areas covered by the C-l zoning are located in the wetland and are controlled by the watershed district. He further indicated that the City will be discussing and passing a shoreland ordinance to provide guidelines and controls over the area. Council Member Capra indicated that several residents were concerned for development in the wetland. Mr. Palzer indicated that Rice Creek Watershed District has strict regulations governing development in the wetlands. Council Member Broussard Vickers clarified that the C-l zoning would be discussed during the zoning map public hearing. Council Member Capra suggested handling the garage issue and tabling the rest of the changes because she had not had a chance to review the Ordinance as it was received prior to the start of the meeting. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that changing the Ordinance for one item and then having to change it again for the rest of the items would be expensive for the City. Page 2 of 25 Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that Council could discuss the changes at the budget work session and approve the changes at the first meeting in December. She then indicated she would not vote to change one item because it is too big of an expense to the City. Mayor Swedberg asked if all 70 pages of the Ordinance would need to be published for the one change. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that a synopsis of the proposed change could be published. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that a sentence that indicates the full copy ofthe Ordinance is available for review at City Hall could be added to the publication notice. Mayor Swedberg asked how much it would cost to publish the change. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she was not sure how much it would cost as it has to be published twice. Mayor Swedberg indicated it might not be possible to figure out the changes at this meeting. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the majority of the changes are fairly straight forward and are mostly housekeeping issues. She indicated that the garage item had consensus by the Planning and Zoning Commission but the corner lot issue was not decided upon. Council Member Nelson indicated that she did not want to push the matter back again because Staff failed to provide adequate documentation. She then indicated she would be comfortable with Council Member Broussard Vickers walking Council through the changes. She further commented that Council needs to receive the documents prior to the day of the meeting to allow time for review. Ms. Moore-Sykes apologized for the document confusion and explained that there was supposed to be a Table A that contained a list of revisions but there were no revisions or suggestions in Table A. Council Member Capra asked if Council could continue the hearing for later on in the evening to go over the Ordinance line by line. Mayor Swedberg asked if anyone knew how much a full page ad in the Quad Community Press would cost. Theresa Brenner indicated that a !4 page advertisement costs $286.00. Mayor Swedberg indicated he did not think it would cost any more than $100.00 to publish for the garage two times and said that, if it does, he would pay for it out of his pocket. Council Member Capra asked that Council take public comment on Ordinance #4 and move on with the meeting as there is a lot on the agenda. Page 3 of 25 Mr. Jeremy Bates of 1977 Robin Lane South indicated that he had been told by Council that he needed to follow the process to have the Ordinance changed. He then indicated that he has done so and he would really like approval of the change to the Ordinance tonight. Mr. Tracy Tratar 1710 Peltier Lake Drive indicated he had requested Council change the comer lot setback from 35 feet to 20 feet. He then explained that by following all of the setbacks for his comer lot he is not allowed to build on 68% of his lot and he feels that is exceSSIve. Council Member Broussard Vickers referred Council to pages 6 and 7 of the Planning and Zoning minutes for the discussion concerning comer lots. She then asked how many Planning and Zoning Commission Members were at the work session. Mr. Bates indicated there were four Commissioners at the work session. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the Planning and Zoning Commission was concerned that allowing a 20 foot setback for comer lots would be a problem with new construction. Council Member Nelson suggested adding the words "if the side street is clearly evident then the setback would be 20 feet instead of 35 feet." City Attorney Hoeft indicated it was not sure what clearly evident meant. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the language could be changed to allow for either the setback or the average of the adjacent homes whichever is greater to prevent homes from sticking out farther than the others. Mr. Tratar indicated that his argument is that every comer lot is just the way he wants to do his addition. He then questioned how other residents in the City were allowed to build their additions that way if there is this 35 foot setback rule. Council Member Broussard Vickers stated that she felt the Planning and Zoning Commission should review the wording. She then asked Mr. Tratar if he had gotten measurements from other lots in town. Mr. Tratar indicated he did not know he was supposed to bring the inforn1ation to the Council meeting. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated it would be helpful to know what currently exists when discussing the wording. She then clarified that no one had told Mr. Tratar not to file for a variance but said he had been warned to review the requirements carefully as he may not be entitled to a variance and would lose the variance fee. Council Member Broussard Vickers suggested allowing the Planning and Zoning Commission some time to discuss the matter because Mr. Tratar is not building the garage until spring. Page 4 of 25 Mayor Swedberg indicated Council understood what Mr. Tratar was saying and indicated that the City needs to find the right words to make it consistent throughout the City. Ms. Tratar of 171 0 Peltier Lake Drive asked if the Ordinance could be worded to apply only to existing properties and not for new construction. She then commented that by driving around the City she has concluded that they are the only comer lot without a garage. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that would be possible to word the Ordinance as Ms. Tratar had suggested but said the City should stay away from making ordinances that apply to a single piece of property. Ms. Tratar indicated that if they could get approval and get the footings in before the ground freezes they could work on the garage in the cold. Mayor Swedberg indicated that the Planning and Zoning Commission was not meeting again until the beginning of December. Shelly Olson of Chetak, Wisconsin indicated she was in attendance for the dog kennel ordinance change and asked if the change had been made to allow for dog kennels in the industrial park. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the Planning and Zoning Commission did not have a problem with allowing dog kennels in the industrial park with a special use permi t. Ms. Olson indicated that she drives two hours to come to the meetings and asked if her change would be approved at this meeting. She then indicated that she would need to get her special use permit before going any farther with her contractors. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the use was approved and then explained that Ms. Olson would need to work with Mr. Palzer and Ms. Moore-Sykes to determine what needed to be done to obtain the special use pernlit. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the ordinance change would be effective around the first of the year and explained that Ms. Olson would then be back before the Planning and Zoning Commission to discuss the special use permit and obtain approval of the special use permit and the preliminary plat. Mr. Palzer indicated that the previous version of Ordinance #4 had allowed for a 30-foot setback on comer lots. Mayor Swedberg asked whether there would be any utilities in the 35-foot setback area. Mr. Palzer indicated that there should not be. Mr. Tratar indicated he had checked and the utilities are within the 15- foot City right-of-way. Page 5 of 25 Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council Member Nelson to close the public hearing. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Swedberg closed the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. 2. Zoning Map Modifications (Continued from Planning and Zoning) Mayor Swedberg opened the public hearing at 7:46 p.m. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the Planning and Zoning Commission had thought the changes to the zoning map were housekeeping in nature until it heard testimony by residents at the meeting that they were concerned about changing the C-l zoning district to R-l. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the Planning and Zoning Commission had thought this matter should be revisited since the changes do not have to be done right away. She indicated that the wetlands are controlled by Rice Creek Watershed District but residents are concerned about the ability to trade wetlands and fill property in. She further indicated that the City may need to allow for C-l zoning in its Comprehensive Plan and Ordinance #4. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Rice Creek Watershed District has the final say in the wetland as well as the shoreline ordinance that is before the Metropolitan Council and will soon be before Council for approval. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that residents were told that the C-l zoning would be kept unless there was a legal reason the City could not use that designation any longer. Council Member Capra indicated she had received a telephone call from a resident that ws adamant that they wanted to retain the C-l zoning district because wetlands can be traded. Mr. Palzer indicated that there is a resident trying to build in the flood plain right now that had preliminary approval from Rice Creek Watershed. Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council Member Nelson to close the public hearing. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Swedberg closed the public hearing at 7:52 p.m. Council recessed at 7:53 p.m. Council reconvened at 8:02 p.m. Page 6 of 25 IV. APPEARANCES/AWARDS 1. Mr. Mike Quigley, Gor-Em (Eagle Pass 2nd Addition) Mike Quigley of Gor-Em reviewed the changes to the plan with Council and indicated that Gor-Em had addressed most ofthe issues by converting to the twin home format as was originally planned. He indicated that the issues with the existing development have been addressed and the screening requested at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting had been added. He also indicated that Ojibway Drive could be addressed in letter form or through a clause in the developer's agreement. He further indicated that he would be more than happy to provide a trail if the Association and the City are able to come to an agreement as to the terms. Ms. Moore-Sykes commented that it may not be in the City's best interest to put language concerning a private road into its developer's agreement. Mayor Swedberg asked whether the proposed road on the east side of the development would be a private road. Mr. Quigley indicated that it was planned to be private. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that there were a lot of residents present at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and those in attendance had brought up screening, keeping as many trees as possible or transplanting those that are to be removed, the distance between the houses at the end of Ojibway Drive, and the private road. She then indicated that the major issue concerned potential damage to Ojibway Drive by construction vehicles. She further indicated that residents in attendance were concerned about the street lighting in the existing development. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the Association had petitioned the City to take over the private street and was upset because the City has not yet responded. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the developer had agreed to provide screening as indicated on the site plan. She then indicated that she felt Council needed to discuss the private road issue to determine whether Council wants to take over the street. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that she is of the opinion that the City should not add to a situation it knows is a problem for residents by allowing the development to be constructed with another private road. Mayor Swedberg commented that Ojibway Drive was designed and constructed to be a private road and, in his opinion, should stay as a private road. He then commented that, if residents want additional lighting, they should petition the City for lighting but know that the residents would bear the cost of that additional lighting. He further commented that he has driven through the development at night and does not feel that it is any darker than some of the other neighborhoods in the City. Mr. Quigley clarified that the only difference in a private road is the width. Page 7 of 25 Council Member Capra commented that she thought the underlayment was different for a private road. Mr. Quigley indicated that the road was built to MSA standards. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the Association has a problem with the cost and ability to maintain a road. She then indicated that residents had asked, if the City should decide not to take over the road, if the Association could be informed of when the City reconstructs the streets in the area so the Association can join in the bid in order to keep costs down. Mr. Quigley indicated he did not think the roads could be changed because they were approved under a PUD. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that a PUD allows for unique setbacks and can be reconsidered. Council Member Nelson indicated she would prefer to keep the road private as that is how it was designed and the Association was set up to handle the costs for maintaining the road. She then indicated that she, too, feels that the development is not any darker than other neighborhoods in the City. She further commented that the City is not as bright as what residents may be used to coming from a more metropolitan area. Council Member Capra questioned whether there would be street lights at the intersections of the new roads when houses are built there. Mr. Quigley indicated that he was not sure as he does not design the lighting. Council Member Capra commented that there would be another light added in the existing development where it connects to the new development. Mr. Quigley asked who designs the street lights. Council Member Travis indicated that Xcel Energy designs the streetlights. City Engineer Peterson indicated that Xcel designed the layout of the streetlights. Mr. Quigley indicated that there are 12 lights. He then commented that he paid the City for 15 lights. Council Member Travis indicated that he felt the street should remain private. He then commented that he did not think the specifications were the same for public and private streets because private streets do not have the subcut and draintile. Mr. Quigley indicated that the street was designed to MSA standards. Council Member Travis indicated that, if residents want more lighting, they should petition the City and realize that they will be paying for it. He then indicated that he would like the Association to consider allowing a trail through its property. Ms. Lori Peterson of 7065 Dupre Road indicated the Association would consider allowing the trail if the City would take over the street but otherwise the Association Page 8 of 25 would have liability all the way across their land and the road. She then indicated that the elderly housing should not have been put in without access. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated there was a 20 foot wide drainage easement through the property. Ms. Peterson commented that the Association could not afford the liability for all the elderly people coming from the senior housing and crossing Ojibway Drive to Dupre Road. Mr. Brian Carlson of 1771 Meadow Lane reminded Mr. Quigley that he had agreed to push Units 9 and 10 forward 10 feet. Mr. Quigley agreed to do so. Mayor Swedberg complimented Mr. Quigley on his efIorts to blend the development in and his efforts to address the issues of the existing development. Ms. Lori Peterson of 7065 Dupre Road indicated that the motion that was made at the Planning and Zoning meeting included the addition of the association requested items which were trees, trailway through the outlot, concerns with screening and a written guarantee for Ojibway Drive. Mayor Swedberg indicated that those sorts of items are handled in the developer's agreement. Ms. Peterson asked when residents would have input into the developer's agreement. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the details would be approved when the final plat is approved. Mayor Swedberg asked Ms. Moore-Sykes to notify the Association when the final plat is before Council for final plat approval. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked whether it was appropriate to put the road agreement in the developer's agreement or whether it should be between the Association and the developer. City Attorney Hoeft indicated he did not want the road in the developer's agreement. Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned whether the Association's only recourse is a civil suit if the City approves the development and the road is damaged. City Attorney Hoeft indicated the Association would have civil recourse and said the City would not condition approval of the development on the agreement between the developer and the Association. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked how the Association could prevent access to the road. City Attorney Hoeft indicated he was not prepared to give the Association legal Page 9 of 25 advice on that matter. He then commented that the City should not dictate how the Association governs its roads. Mr. Quigley indicated that he has committed several times in a public forum and again in written form that any street damage would be taken care of for a period of two years. He then indicated that he had another letter with him at the meeting that he was prepared to give to the Association. City Attorney Hoeft clarified that approval of the final plat would be contingent upon Units 9 and 10 being moved forward 10 feet. He then indicated that Council needed to detennine whether the new street on the eastern side of the proposed development would be public or private. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked the Association if they wished to have the road public or private. Bert Casper of 6979 Dupre Road indicated he did not want any more private roads in the development. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she was not in favor of adding another private street when the current private street has caused so many problems. Mayor Swedberg indicated he was fine with requiring the street be public. Ms. Lori Peterson of 7065 Dupre Road indicated that the extension to Ojibway Drive has to be supported by 18 current units and 12 potential new units and the proposed other private road is supported by 65 units. She then commented that it does not make sense to allow a private street to be supported by so few residents especially since they are all paying taxes and do not receive a break for the services the City does not provide to them. Mayor Swedberg indicated he understood Ms. Peterson's point but indicated that the private street was in the agreement when she bought her house and she should have been aware of it. Motion bv Council Member Nelson, seconded by Council Member Travis to approve the Preliminary Plat for Eagle Pass 2nd Addition contingent upon moving Units 9 and 10 forward 10 feet and the new road to the east ofthe proposed development being wide enough to be a public road. Council Member Broussard Vickers commented that a few residents are burdened with the private road and the City is adding to it. She indicated that, if the City is not interested in taking over the road, the entrance should have been re-drawn to allow for entrance off of a public road. She further indicated that she was not against the development but feels the City is intensifying an existing problem by allowing the development to continue with the extension of the private road. Page 10 of25 Council Member Travis commented that there are more private roads in Centerville and questioned whether the City would have to take over all private roads. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the City had not received a petition from any other residents asking the City to take over a private street other than the one for Ojibway Drive. Council Member Capra questioned whether there was another definition that could be used other than "street" to allow the City to take over the road but not require widening such as a trailway. City Engineer Peterson indicated a trail way would need to be marked as such and cars are not allowed on trails. VOTE: Ayes - 4, Nays - 1 (Broussard Vickers). Motion carried. 2. Mr. Lloyd Drilling, Uptown Center (Comprehensive Sign Plan) Mr. Eric Bowman of 7130 Shad Avenue indicated he had noticed that sod or seed was being put down at the strip mall without a berm or fence. He indicated he had spoken to the person doing the sodding and seeding and this person was not aware there was to be a bemI and fence. He also indicated that he had heard, through the grapevine, that Mr. Drilling does not want to put in the sidewalk as required. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that Mr. Drilling had agreed to provide a berm and a fence. She then indicated that there is to be a trail on both sides. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Mr. Drilling has until June of 2002 to complete the trail, fence and bemI. Mr. Bowman indicated his wife had called City Hall and was told that no one would be allowed to move into the building until everything is done. He then asked if that was COlTect infoDnation. Mr. Palzer indicated that businesses would be allowed to move in prior to the completion of the sod, fence, and berm. Mr. Palzer then indicated that the developer's agreement requires that the sod, fence and beDn be completed by June of 2002. Council Member Travis indicated that the City has a letter of credit on Mr. Drilling that would be used to pay for the City to have those items done if they are not completed. Mr. Jerry Engler of7127 Shad Avenue provided pictures of his flooded backyard to Council for review. He then indicated that water was pumped out two or three and said that unless the grade is corrected the same thing will happen in the spring. City Engineer Peterson indicated that there is no pond on site and the site is supposed to be graded such that the storm sewer will catch that water. Page 11 of25 Mayor Swedberg asked City Engineer Peterson to review the matter to make sure the property is graded correctly to eliminate Mr. Engler's water problem. Mr. Engler indicated that if his backyard fills up everyone to the north of his property will have the same problem because the water drains from north to south. City Engineer Peterson indicated that the final grade had not been done at the property. Council Member Capra asked if Mr. Palzer had reviewed the new strip mall. Mr. Palzer indicated that Mr. Drilling had not called for a final inspection so the property has not been reviewed. Mayor Swedberg thanked the residents for bringing the matter to the City's attention and indicated that the City would make sure things are done according to the agreement. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the Planning and Zoning Commission had determined that Mr. Drilling did not need to provide a comprehensive sign plan to Council for approval as the change had taken place after the site plan was approved. 3. Ad Hoc Communications Committee Theresa Brenner and the other members of the Committee reviewed with Council its repOli on recommendations. V. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES 1. October 24, 2001 Council Meeting Minutes Council Member Broussard Vickers requested the following changes: On Page 18 indicate the decision was left up to the City Administrator. On Page 17, indicate she did not think the City would find someone to buy the house. Council Member Capra questioned whether Mr. Carpenter was informed by the underwriter of his mortgage or by City Staff that his property was nonconforming. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the underwriter had informed him that his property was non-conforming and then he came to City Hall to look into the matter and City Staff had told him as well. Council Member Capra requested the following changes: On Page 7, change "him" to "his." On Page 8, change "hard" to "had". On Page 11 specify who made the motions. Motion by Council Member Council Member Nelson, seconded by Council Member Council Member Capra to approve the October 24, 2001 Council Minutes as amended. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. Page 12 of25 VI. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS None. VII. OLD BUSINESS 1. Grassen Companies - Streetlights (Eagle Pass 2nd Addition) Mayor Swedberg apologized for misleading the residents in attendance into believing that the streetlight issue had been discussed as he was not aware this was on the agenda. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the two issues were the same. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended that Council seriously consider the streetlight situation and make a decision. She then explained that some of the Commissioners felt the City could put some lights in and some felt the City should not put more lights in. She also explained that there was a resident in attendance that had accused the Planning Commission of not caring about the safety of the residents. She further explained that the residents of Eagle Pass feel that the neighborhood is not safe because the streets are winding and there are not enough lights. Council Member Nelson asked if there was a way to check into why Mr. Quigley had paid for 15 lights and there are only 12 in the development. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that getting 12 lights when he paid for 15 lights is an issue for the developer to deal with. Council Member Travis indicated that Mr. Quigley paid the City for the 15 lights as part of the developer's agreement. City Attorney Hoeft indicated he did not have the developer's agreement with him but said he does not think the developer's agreement is based on a number. He then indicated that streetlights are calculated and an amount is required for escrow or letter of credit based on the estimate of lights for the development. He further indicated that the City and the developer are not obligated to the 15 lights. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the lighting for the development was designed by Xcel Energy and reviewed and signed off on by the City Engineer. Mayor Swedberg asked staff to respond to the letter from Grassen Companies. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if it was the consensus of Council not to authorize more street lights in the development. Page 13 of25 City Attorney Hoeft clarified that the City is not obligated to put in additional street lights. He then indicated that Council could do so if it wanted to. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the residents had also asked for stop signs and/or a reduced speed limit because they feel that 30 mph is excessive for the type of street. She then questioned whether Council would be willing to pay for the cost of running electricity to the lights if the residents were to pay for the costs of the poles and lights. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she had obtained a listing of lights owned by the City, by NSP and residents. Mr. Palzer indicated that it costs the City approximately $150 per light per year for electricity. He then indicated that the lights have 100 or ISO-watt bulbs and he had been attempting to contact NSP to determine whether the bulbs could be upgraded in an attempt to increase the light output. Council Member Broussard Vickers suggested including the bid to run power to the poles in with the bid for the preliminary plat to reduce costs. Mayor Swedberg asked if it was possible to run power to the additional lights. Mr. Palzer agreed to look into the matter. Mr. Palzer indicated that the wattage of the light bulbs in the City varies making it difficult to determine what areas of the City are darker than others. Council Member Nelson indicated that she did not feel the City should pay for additional lighting in the development. She then indicated she would consider the stop signs and change of speed limit if the residents petition the City and state exactly what they want the speed limit to be and where they want the stop signs. Mayor Swedberg indicated that sometimes when a stop sign is put in it could create worse problems than were there in the first place. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the residents were told that the Police Department would review the request and advise Council on the matter. Council Member Capra indicated she would like to see petitions from the surrounding residents. Council Member Capra indicated she was in favor of paying for the yearly electrical charge to operate the light but not the fee to run power to the poles. Council Member Nelson indicated she would be willing to have the City pay the yearly electrical charge to operate the light but did not want the City to pay for running the power to the poles. Page 14 of25 Council Member Travis asked how much it costs to install additional1ighting. He then indicated that he thought NSP would install the light for free because he has never seen a street light bill. He further clarified that the City charges the developer $1,500 to $2,000 per light but he has not seen a bill from NSP for those lights. Mayor Swedberg asked the City Engineer to look into the costs of additional street lights. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the City Engineer would need to bill the City to do so and suggested that Mr. Palzer may be able to investigate the costs of the streetlights. Mr. Palzer indicated that the design and layout of the streetlights in the development was done by NSP and said he would contact them to discuss the matter. Maym Swedberg asked Mr. Palzer to have NSP restate the recommendation for streetlighting in the development. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked that Staff include in the letter to the Association that it was the consensus of Council that the City needs to receive a petition for reduced speed limit with a specific speed, a request for stop signs and the Association needs to go to the Police Department for a recommendation before coming to Council. Mayor Swedberg asked if the City has the authority to set the speed on City streets. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the City does have the authority to set the speed limit on City streets and indicated that if no speed limit is set the statutory default is 30 mph. He then indicated that the Police Department would probably agree that stop signs and reduced speed are not going to address the safety issue the way residents think they will. 2. Mueller Pipeliners (Terminal Transport Building) Ms. Moore-Sykes passed out a copy of the site plan because the one included in packets cut off the aggregate parking lot which is at issue in this matter. Brent Coatney, the owner of Terminal Transport located at 6812 20th Avenue indicated his business is operating at that location but, due to economic considerations, he needs to downsize his operations and is seeking approval of Mueller Pipe liners as a tenant. JeffNordness of 25882 East Comfort Drive, Wyoming Township indicated they had come before Council to get an idea of what needed to be done to gain approval of the parking lot extension. He then indicated that the site plan is the same as the one that was approved in 1998 with the exception of the fact that they intend to use an aggregate base rather than bituminous because of the track vehicles. Mr. Nordness indicated that he was asked at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting to obtain a letter from Rice Creek Watershed District indicating that the ponding Page 15 of25 was adequate. He then explained that he had attempted to get the letter and was told by Rice Creek Watershed District that they would not have approved the proj ect if the ponding was not adequate. Council Member Travis noted there is a regional pond in the industrial park. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that on the second page of the permit under special stipulations there is a sentence that says if the pond is not completed at the time of construction a NURP pond is required on site. She then indicated that the Planning and Zoning Commission had asked Mueller Pipe liners to obtain a letter from Rice Creek Watershed District indicating that the pond was a regional pond and no NURP pond is required. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked whether Rice Creek Watershed District could decide to require the NURP pond at a later date if they decide the existing pond is inadequate. Mr. Nordness indicated that the industrial park sites were all designed for that regional pond. Mayor Swedberg indicated that the company would be responsible for constructing a NURP if Rice Creek Watershed District were to require one at some point in the future. Mr. Coatney indicated that a NURP would have been required if the ponding had not been done but the regional pond has been constructed by Mr. Rehbein. He also indicated that completion of the regional pond to mitigate water on the site was part of the purchase price for the lot. Council Member Travis indicated that the site plan for KCI does not have a retention pond because all the water from the site drains to the regional pond. City Engineer Peterson indicated that the site currently drains to the pond. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she did not have a problem with the plan. Mayor Swedberg asked if there would be any type of screening done. Mr. Coatney indicated he had planted double the number of pine trees required and commented that the residents across the street had called him to thank him for planting the trees. Motion by Council Member Nelson, seconded by Council Member Broussard Vickers to approve the parking lot expansion for Mueller Pipeliners as presented and require that the trees are never to be removed without the permission of Council. Council Member Broussard Vickers requested a friendly amendment to the motion to require that the company not be able to remove the tree line without permission of Council. Page 16 of25 Council Member Nelson accepted the friendly amendment. Council Member Capra indicated she was concerned that the permit did not specify the approval of the aggregate parking lot but said, if Mueller Pipeliners was willing to go on record as saying that Rice Creek Watershed District had approved the aggregate parking lot, she would be fine with the plan. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the permit referred to a detail sheet and that detail sheet indicates an aggregate parking lot. VOTE: Ayes - 5, Nays - O. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Budget/Deferred Comp/Union Contract (Update) Council Member Capra indicated she was not able to attend the meeting with Abdo, Eick and Meyer due to illness. She then indicated that more records need to be pulled before the audit can continue. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she had been informed by the City Clerk that there was a list of items needing to be pulled before the audit could continue. Council Member Capra indicated that the representative from Abdo, Eick and Meyer was very disappointed in the filing and record keeping systems of the City. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she had just heard there was a problem and noted she was in the office both days that the Abdo, Eick and Meyers representative was in and she was not told of a problem with the records. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the matter needed to be moved up on the priority list. Council Member Capra indicated that she had thought only the records from 1996 and 1997 needed to be pulled but was told all records need to be pulled. She then indicated she would have time in the coming week to flag items to be copied. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Abdo, Eick and Meyers had requested all infol111ation for 1998 and 1999 and the report from PEBSCO from 1996 to 2001. Council Member Capra indicated that Abdo, Eick and Meyers had recommended the City hire a temp to get the files in order. 4. Quad Cities Police Department (Update) Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the City of Circle Pines had asked that the joint police department discussions be put off until January due to changes in Council. Page 17 of25 5. Vinca Overages (Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park) Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she had sent a letter to Vinco asking that they provide justification for the assessment of the cost of overages to the City. She then indicated that she had not yet heard from Vinca. 6. Turcotte Property (Update - Ro-So $6.200) Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the estimate from Ro-So to excavate and haul away debris had changed from $5,000 to $6,200. Council Member Nelson asked why the estimate had increased. Mr. Palzer indicated that the estimate was changed from burying the debris to hauling it away. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that, in her experience, the MPCA takes a dim view of burying construction debris and the City could end up removing it in the future. City Attorney Hoeft indicated he had received the signed petition for the registration of the property and that is in the hands of the attorney working on that part of the matter. Council Member Nelson indicated she feels the City needs to take care of this matter. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she would like to get other bids because the estimate has climbed over the $5,000 mark. Council Member Travis asked if Mr. Palzer had been in the house. Mr. Palzer indicated that he had been in the house. Council Member Travis asked ifMr. Palzer felt there were hazardous materials. Mr. Palzer indicated there were just concrete floors and bare walls downstairs. Council Member Travis commented that the estimate is getting pretty close to what it would cost to demolish the building and do a complete clean up. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she had passed out a letter from Don Sempel House Movers who had offered to pay the City $300 to take the house away. Council Member Capra indicated that Mr. March had said he watches the ads in the paper and had not seen the house advertised. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that StatI had made phone calls to house movers. Council Member Capra indicated she had been told that one of the Ban-etts was interested in purchasing the townhome at one time. Page 18 of25 Mr. Palzer indicated he would prefer to have a professional house mover move the house rather than an individual who attempts to move it and the City end up with a house that is moved off the foundation and sitting there. Council Member Capra indicated that any offer of purchase the City receives she would assume would involve using a professional house mover to move the house. Mayor Swedberg asked whether the City is required to obtain bids for the house. City Attorney Hoeft indicated there were no requirements to follow. Council Member Nelson indicated that she liked the house mover but suggested attempting to lower the costs. Council directed Staff to get more bids to clean up the site. Council Member Travis indicated he felt the bid was expensive for removing a foundation. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that she would approve this amount if Staff is not able to find something lower. 7. Holiday Party (Update) Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that she had included in Council packets information from the League of Minnesota Cities concerning City sponsored events for employees. She then indicated that if a prior understanding existed with the employees that the holiday party was part of the employees' compensation it may be okay to do so but the information suggests that it is better to avoid City sponsored events. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she had called Majestic Oaks and was told that no reservation was made but one could still be made if it was done right away. Ms. Moore-Sykes suggested that it would be more appropriate to ask employees to pay their own way for the holiday party. She also indicated that Staff had suggested using the money the City would have used for the holiday party toward the volunteer event in the sprmg. Council Member Capra indicated that there were two different events the one for volunteers at Kellys and the other was a dinner for Staff. Council Member Nelson indicated that individual dinners at a restaurant may have been more money than the City was planning to spend for the volunteer event. Council Member Capra indicated she would like to allocate the money that was used for the Kelly's party for the volunteer event in the spring. Page 19 of25 Council Member Capra suggested posting the event and holding an informal potluck type gathering and holiday party. Mayor Swedberg indicated he would like Staff to suggest what they would like for a holiday party. 8. Entrance Monument Council Member Capra indicated that the information was in packets for informational purposes. Mr. Palzer indicated there is an issue as to whether the City owns the property or has an easement for the property where the sign is to be located. Council Member Nelson indicated she thought the City had an easement for the sign. Council Member Capra indicated that power was run out to the sign location by County Bank. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that no easement was in place at this point and recommended that the easement be obtained before the sign is installed. Mr. Palzer indicated that the drawing did not include any brick work. Council Member Capra indicated that Mr. Bode would provide the name of the brick layer that did the bank. Mr. Palzer indicated he would check into the easement issue. Council Member Capra asked if there were any gambling funds. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the City Clerk had not yet called but had pulled an expense sheet that indicated there is approximately $18,155.00 in the account. Mayor Swedberg asked whether there would be only one sign or if there would be others in the future. Council Member Capra indicated that the m1work for the sign could be purchased for $100.00. Council Member Travis indicated the City had planned for just the one entrance monument. Council Member Nelson indicated the City wanted to make a splash with the entrance in the commercial area. She then commented that she feels the sign design better represents the French Canadian heritage and she really likes it. 9. Public Works Mowing vs. Contractual Mowing (Update) Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the Public Works Director had provided an estimate for the City to do its own mowing. Page 20 of 25 Mr. Palzer explained to Council how he had arrived at his cost estimate for the City to do its own weed whipping and mowing. Mayor Swedberg asked if the Ford tractor the Public Works Staff has had power take off and whether there was a cutting blade that could be put on it. Mr. Palzer indicated that the cutting blade does not have a floating deck. VIII. NEW BUSINESS 1. Ordinance #4 Amendments Council Member Broussard Vickers recommended going through Mr. Palzer's list of the changes. Mr. Palzer indicated he did not have his notes but said all of the wording recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission was put in the Ordinance. He also noted that the Planning and Zoning Commission would be looking at the Ordinance again this winter. Mr. Palzer clarified that the draft Ordinance presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission was reviewed and contained everything that was discussed at the previous meeting. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that it was difficult to tell what pages had been changed because none of the changes were highlighted. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the changes are highlighted on the Screen but when it is printed out the changes do not show up. She then indicated that the intern is in the process of going back through and marking the document. Council Member Nelson asked if the printer was a colored printer. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that it was but said it was not cost or time efficient to print several copies of an 80 page ordinance. Mr. Palzer indicated he could walk Council through the document. Mayor Swedberg indicated he would like to review the entire document at a later point but wants to figure out how to allow the garage to be built tonight. Council Member Travis indicated he would like to approve the garage as a separate item and review the remaining Ordinance changes at another time. Mayor Swedberg noted if the costs to publish the ordinance change for the garage issue were more than $100.00 he would pay for it. Page 21 of 25 Council Member Broussard Vickers suggested there were a couple more changes that were straightforward and could be included in the published changes. She then read the wording that had been changed to allow the garage in the R-4 district and noted that it says minimum but the word should be maximum. Mr. Palzer indicated he thought the word should be minimum. After various discussions it was determined that the appropriate word was maximum. Mr. Palzer indicated that the 10% greenspace was being added with this ordinance change. Council discussed the sideyard setbacks for comer lots with Mr. Tratar and was unable to come to a consenSllS as to how the Ordinance should be worded. Mayor Swedberg indicated that the issue could not be solved at this meeting and suggested that the Planning and Zoning Commission should review the matter and make a recommendation to Council. Motion by Council Member Nelson, seconded bv Mayor Swedberg to approve the Ordinance change on Page 24 of 82, Division 5, Accessory Buildings to read: commercial uses as defined by Ordinance #4 in the M-l District will follow the commercial guidelines for percentage of greenspace. For all other properties in the M-l district a maximum accessory structure 01'704 square feet is allowed and a 440 square foot structure in the R-4 district not to exceed the size of the principal structure if an attached garage does not exist. If an attached garage exists, the maximum accessory structure size is 20A' of the lot size or a maximum of 200 square feet. Ayes - 4, Nays -l(Broussard Vickers). Motion carried. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked Mr. Tratar to bring the measurements he had offered to gather to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. 2. Gor-Em (Eagle Pass 2nd Addition) This item was handled earlier in the meeting. 3. KCI - Site and Sign Plan Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the City Engineer had indicated a grading plan needed to be provided. She also indicated that KCI needed to provide proof of the 10% greenspace requirement. Mayor Swedberg questioned why a new building had been built in the commercial area without a plan before Council. Mr. Palzer indicated that the building was started prior to the new administration. Page 22 of 25 Mr. Palzer indicated the building was handled under the previous administration and never went through the process. He then indicated that he had done the building code items but none of the zoning code items were addressed. Council Member Capra indicated that the building stores ammunition. Milo Bennett, Fire Chief, indicated that an ammunition distributorship is operated out of the building. Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council Member Nelson to table approval of KCI site plan and sign plan pending receipt of the grading plan and 10% greenspace. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Thermal Imaging Cameras - Centennial Fire Milo Bennett, Fire Chief, indicated that this item was on Council's agenda because the steering committee had met and did not have a quorum and was unable to act on the matter. He then explained that the Fire Department has one them1al imaging camera that was bought a year ago and it has become invaluable to the Department. He further explained that new models are being made and the Department can purchase three cameras that are smaller and easier to use for the price of the first one it purchased. e Fire Chief Bennett indicated that donation money is available from the Firefighters Relief Association through its charitable gambling operations for the purchase of the cameras. Motion by Council Member Capra, seconded by Council Member Broussard Vickers to approve the purchase of three thermal imaging cameras with donated funds as requested by the Centennial Fire Department. Mayor Swedberg asked if the Fire Department has biohazard suits. Fire Chief Bennett indicated that the hazmat issues are handled through Anoka County by the Fridley, Mounds View Spring Lake Park, Coon Rapids Departments. He then indicated that there is grant money available to purchase the suits but the catch is that personnel would need to be trained and that training would need to be maintained to satisfy the OSHA requirements for hazmat response. He further indicated that there is no grant money available to pay for the training. Mayor Swedberg asked if there had been any progress on the 800 megahertz radio system for the County. Fire Chief Bennett indicated that the radio system is a $12 million dollar issue for the County. He then indicated that the County had discussed going after a taxing district for the radio system but is now looking into a 911 surcharge and is attempting to have legislation passed that would allow it. Page 23 of 25 VOTE: Ayes - 5, Nays - O. Motion carried unanimously. Council recessed to change the tape at 9:46 p.m. Council reconvened at 9:48 p.m. IX. CONSENT AGENDA 1. The City ofCenterville October 25,2001 through November 14, 2001 Expendi tures. 2. Centennial Fire District Expenditures Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Broussard Vickers to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. XI. COMMITTEE REPORTS Council Member Capra indicated she had a question on the financial statements and then indicated she had been told some items were coded wrong. She then asked if it would be possible to have correct information by the November 26, 2001 budget work session. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Staff is working on the numbers and she had asked Theresa to print an audit for all the departments. She then indicated that she went through line by line to see why some items are excessively over budget and it appears there have been a number of coding errors. She further indicated that she would like to change the billing process to require that the billings be submitted to the department heads for review and coding before being submitted for payment. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated it would be helpful for department heads to see the invoices and it would help with coding. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she thought the change would ensure a more accurate quarterly report. Council Member Capra commented that the quarterly report is not right and the accounting and financials of the City are a disaster. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she is attempting to get a handle on the issues. Council Member Nelson commented that it is the middle of November and Council has not seen the numbers to know where the City is with its budget. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that she was entering week four of her employment with the City and she is still having fUll. Page 24 of 25 Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that concerns about the personnel policy would be held for discussion after the budget process is finalized. Council Member Capra indicated that she did not attend the Cable Commission meeting because of the budget work session. She then indicated that the meeting was moved to another night and she was not able to attend that meeting either. She further indicated that the next Cable Commission meeting was scheduled for the Wednesday before Thanksgiving and she would be attending. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the Planning and Zoning Commission is packing the house with its numerous public hearings. She then indicated that the Commission had received the resignation of Barry Brainard and may be receiving another resignation in the near future. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she would speak to Theresa to determine what needs to be done to adveliise for the vacant seats. Mayor Swedberg questioned whether there was a resignation from the Planning and zoning Commission or Park and Recreation. Council Member Broussard Vickers clarified that there was one resignation for sure and possibly two on the Planning and Zoning Commission and one on the Park and Recreation Committee. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the Park and Recreation Committee had inquired as to the budget for next year and she told them that she had no inforn1ation on the budget until after the budget work sessions. XII. ADJOURNMENT Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council Member Capra to adjourn the November 14,2001 City Council Meeting at 10:25 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed by: Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Page 25 of 25 lVIElVIO DATE: November 28,2001 TO: Ivlayor and City Council FROM: Kim lVloore-Sykes RE: Letter to Gassen Companies Regarding Their Lighting Request G~~~gm~a~~~~~~~a~~~~a~a~a~~~~~"~~.~.a5~~ga~.qa~~~Y~~~m~ma~~ao~.gmg~aa~~~s~~~ Attached is a copy of the letter that I sent to Ivls. Jodie Woodrovv in response to their request for additional lighting in the Eagle Pass development. 1830 cS tree t .f) 55038 I i:- .staG[isnec[ 1,857 ==J:>;~-C--===--=_,,---,,--..::.= (651) 429-3232 '3 !fa;c (651) 429-8629' November 19,2001 Ms. Jodie Woodrow Gassen Comjpllllllne5 4501 Minnetonka Boulevard Minneapolis, J\/IN 55416 Dear Ms. Woodrow: In response to your letter dated October 24,2001, the Plamling and Zoning Commission and the City COlillCil reviewed your request for added lighting for the Eagle Pass cottages and townhomes. The Council has directed Staff to contact Excel Energy regarding the original lighting plan and what, if anything, can be done to enhance the light capability of the current streetlights. Staff is also investigating whether or not conduit exists in the event that additional streetlights are warranted. Because of the Thanksgiving holiday being this week, Staff may not be able to obtain much in the way of information until next week. Once we have that irrtormation, we can advise you of the options that are available to the Association and the City. Until then, if you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at City Hall, 651-429-3232. Sincerely, l /- ~', <:=-2;:;~]5}):(~ .)/:1 Kim Moore'~Sykes City Administrator iCL <~~_~_ .-"- """ " _'.':11 :~f' '" '~~, :.GL&\SSE~\.~ti ,,~- . ~5 October 24, 2001 Tim Swedberg, Mayor JZim Moore-Sykes, City Manager Council Members City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, Minnesota 55308 RE' SINGLE TO'WNHOMES OF EAGLE PASS COTTAGES Dear Mayor Swedberg, Manager Moore-Sykes, and Council Members: As managing agent for the Single Townhomes of Eagle Pass Cottages Association, the Board of Directors has requested I contact you in regard to street lighting. A major responsibility ofthe City govemment is the safety of citizens. Last July, the residents of Eagle Pass Cottages submitted to you a petition including a request for added street lighting on streets in the first Eagle Pass addition. Now that new streets are to be developed and new light will be installed on those streets in the second addition to Eagle Pass, we would like to request that six additional streetlights also be installed at the same time in locations that will help prevent potential accidents. We remind you that many of the residents of Centerville who drive these streets are elderly, and that the strce5 ts are curved in unusual and severe ways, and that the present lighting does not provide adequate light when the curves in the streets prevent automobile headlights from properly lighting many pOliions of the streets. A driver's response to a situation where a pedestlian or bike might present itself suddenly in one of these many locations COLlid easily be fatal. 'vVe suggest that you drive these streets after dark to see just how dangerous they really are. An amateur study of the lighting needs seems to indicate that new street ligllts in the following locations would solve this problem, bLlt perhaps the City engineer could be directed to conduct a more professional study. The locations we have idcntified are approximately as follows: ~ 7018 Dupre Road " 7057 Duprc Road " 7077 Dupre Road ~ 1857 Pioneer Lane ,>> 6989 Eagle Trail @ about 100 feet North of the NvI,T corner of Dupre Road and Voyager Court ,:> ",'Lc_:':': '. ,\.!~i'-if jc:-\;:~ :"jiii'\~i\jc-3~_, c~:-~~ ~d 'c:<-^_:.::"::';::,"' -__ Tim Swedberg, Mayor Kim Moore-Sykes, City Manager Council Members Page Two Please advise the Board of Directors of what action the City of Centerville will take to address this important safety issue. Thank you. Sincerely, /J ,jL I / / ON Bf1nA~~E fO~Q])))F DIRECTORS AV/ttc! ~v~~ J('i Woodrow \; en Company cc: Board of Directors /JAW MEMO DATE: November 28,2001 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kim Moore-Sykes RE: Public Works Employee Annual Performance Evaluation ............................................................................ Mr. Tedd Peterson started employment with the City ofCenterville on November 15, 1999 as a Public Works employee. On November 19,2001, the Public Works Director completed Mr. Peterson's annual performance evaluation and determined that Mr. Peterson's work performance is exceptionally good and satisfactorily completes all of his job assignments in a timely fashion. Based on this satisfactory performance evaluation, it is recommended that Mr. Peterson be advanced to the next step in the City's compensation schedule. MEMO DATE: November 28,2001 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kim Moore-Sykes RE: Certificate of Recognition for Centerville Element3.ry School ............................................................................ On October 24,2001, Centerville Elementary School participated in a ceremony that declared itself a Peace Site. The City Council desired to recognize Centerville Elementary School's efforts to obtain its designation as a Pease Site and directed Staff to do so with the attached Certificate of Recognition. MEMO DATE: November 28, 2001 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kim Moore-Sykes RE: Certificate of Recognition for Centerville Elementary School ............................................................................ On October 24,2001, Centerville Elementary School participated in a ceremony that declared itself a Peace Site. The City Council desired to recognize Centerville Elementary School's efforts to obtain its designation as a Pease Site and directed Staff to do so with the attached Certificate of Recognition. >> D::c:: LIJ<( 1--1- Zz LlJUJ (.):E UJ ...J UJ ?-.. ~ .... o o :;: u U) -....~ o ~ o ~ ~o-, \.J V) CJ V)~CJ ?-..o~ ~ ~ ~ V) ... ...... V) "::} ~.N ~ ~ ~ ~ E: \.J ~ ~.N ~ -....~O ~ ~ ...... \.J o ~ <:u ...... ~ <:u '" <:u l-.. ~ >- c:: <C I- Z w ~ W ...J W ~ ~ -.... ...... -.... . N .N V) ~ tJ 0 ~ ~ ~ \.J . ...... ~ \.J ~ ~ ~ ~Q..,~ U ~ ~ o '" <:u 0 ...... ...... ':l '--' ~ ..... ...... l-.. <:u '--' W ...J ...J I-l ~ V) \U ~ N .N ~ '-.L ...... o ...:::--..... ..... ~ U ...... V) .N ...... ~ ~ . N ..::: b.Qb.Q~ o ~ 0 \.J oN ~ ~ ...... ~ ~ ~ \.J ~ oN ~~ ~ ~ '" ~ f-., > c:: w I- Z w U OJ ..., '" Cl OJ ..., '" Cl .'-' , :- - '- t ~.: '::.l "; ...... " ;:: k, ~ MEMO DATE: November 28,2001 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kim Moore-Sykes RE: Feasibility Study - Watermain Extension (The Shores) ............................................................................ The City Council directed the City Engineer to do a feasibility study of CSAH 14 watermain proposal for The Shores development. Attached is a draft copy of that requested feasibility study for the Council's consideration. u....... ....~ ~ terville Established 1857 Report for CSAH 14 WATER MAIN EXTENSION Lakeland Hills to The Shores CenterviHe, lVIinnesota November 2001 File No. 616~Ol-123 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlil< and Associates, lnc ;s an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned Bonestroo ~r~~ Rosene. z't\~.r' ~~~~~J~~ ~ ~i -~ Engineers & Architects Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo. FE. .. 1\.-1arvin L. Sorvala, PE. .. Glenn R. Cook, FE. .. Robert G. Scr,unicht, PE. .. Jerry A. Bourdon. PE Senior Consultants: Robert W. Rosene. P.E. .. Joseph C. Anderlik, P.E. . RiShard E. Turner. r.E..,. Susan M. Eberlin, C.P.A. Associate Principals: Keith A. Gordan, P.E. .. Robert R. Pfeffe(t.~. P__~~;-... ,Ric~ard W".,Foster, FE. .. David O. Loskora, P.E. . Mark A. Hanson. PE, .. Michae! T Raurmann. FE. .. Ted K. Field, P;E. ....Kenneth P: Anderson, FE. . ,'vlark R. Rolfs, PE. . David A. BoneHroo, M_B_A. .. Sidney P. Williamson, PE., L.S. .. .Agnes tvl. Ring, M.B./\. . Allan I'(ick Schmidt PE_ . Thomas W. Peterson, PE. .. James R. Maland. P.E... :'vljles B. Jensen, PE . L. Phillip Gravel Ill. PE. .. Daniel J_ Edgerton, P.E_ .. /smael Martinez, FE. .. Thomas A. Syfko, FE. .. Sheldon J. Johnson.. Dale A. Grove, P.E. .. Thcmas A. Roushar, p.E. . Robert J. Devery, FE Offices: St. Paul, Sf. Cloud, Rochester and Willmar, MN .. Milwaukee, WI .. Chicago. IL Website: wW\I'J.bonesrrOO.com November 12,2001 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 Re: CSAH 14 Water Main Extension Feasibility Report Our File No. 616-01-]23 Dear Mayor and Council: Atrached is our Feasibility Report for extending water main along CSAH 14. New development on the north side of Centerville Lake has prompted this study. This report presents a description of the proposed improvements, provides detailed cost estimate,;, and possible assessment scenarios, and includes maps, project schedule and recommendations. We would be pleased to meet with the City Council to discuss the contents of this report. Respectively submitted, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INe. /1 I .. /1/ /, ......... y . ./ V.,d --'.~ L-rJ j I/ U!/ (~;/I.-~___.) ''''--7 / ~LI/}V)~~/) II (i ,_ Thomas W. Peterson, P.E. TWPlcrw I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I arr. a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Nlinnesota. 1 ~ J . I .IU'.0. r" . . ! I. -.', j//-.-t rr7(?Q VV/ I~/ (!'?J(/t-------' Thomas W. Peterson Date: November 12,2001 Reg. No. 16610 2335 West Highway 36 ' St. Paul, MN 55113 " 651'636-4600 " Fax: 651-636-1311 FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR CSAH 14 "Vater lVlain Extension File No. 616-01-123 TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter of Transmi ttal...... ........................................ ........... ......... ........ ............ I Table of Contents........ ........................................... ....................................... 2 Introduction................................................................................................... 3 Proposed ln1provements ........................................................ ..... ................... 3 Permits........................................................................................................... 4 Easelnents...................................................................................................... 4 Cost Summary........................................................ ....................................... 5 Project Schedule............................................................................................ 5 AsseSSlnents .................................................................................................. 5 Conclusions and Recommendations........................................... ................... 7 Appendix A - Detailed Cost Estimates Appendix B - Proposed Assessments Figure I - Location Plan Figure 2 - Proposed \tVater Main Figure 3 - Proposed Assessments CSAH 14 vv'ater iHain Extension Page 2 FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR CSAH 14 WATER MAIN EXTENSION File No. 616-01-123 INTRODUCTION For the past several years, the City of Centerville has been looking at the possibility of extending water main to the northwest area of the City. The driving force has been increased development and fire protection for homes and businesses. When the Lakeland Hills development was built in 1997, water mam was extended along Lakeland Circle. This is the closest main available to connect to and extend new main along the north side of Centerville Lake. The Shores development plans to provide] 0 new residential lots, as shown on Figure 1. The proposed water main along CSAH 14 would eliminate the need for 10 new wells. The main would be sized properly to provide water service to residential homes and provide the required flow for fire protection. PROPOSED IMPROVE1VIENTS As shown on Figure 2, it is proposed to connect to an existing 8-inch diameter water main on Lakeland Circle North. This dead-end main is located 300-feet east of CSAH 14, on the north side of the road. New 12-inch (l0.3" inside diameter) high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe will be directionally drilled under the north boulevard of Lakeland Circle to the intersection of CSAH 14. Along the county road, the pipe will be directionally drilled under the north boulevard from Lakeland Circle to Peltier Lake Drive. It will then cross under l-hvy. 14 and proceed down the south boulevard to vacated Mound Trail. The total length of proposed water main extension is 2,600 feet. CSAH 14 Warer l\1ain Extension Page 3 As noted above, all water main pipe will be installed by directional drilling. No disruption of street pavement will occur using this technique. Some digging is necessary to connect long sections of pipe together, install valves, service connections, and hydrants. Service to homes and businesses along CSAH 14 will be provided. One-inch diameter copper will be extended to the right-of-way line for each residential home. One business, Water works, will receive a 6-inch diameter pipe for future sprinkling in the building. All necessary valves and hydrants will be provided for fire protection and maintenance of the system. Some tree clearing will be necessary to install the mainline pipe and services, but it will be minimal. The directional drilling will also reduce costs associated with dewatering, since the route is adjacent to Centerville Lake and Peltier Lake. Traffic along CSAH 14 can be maintained throughout construction. The proposed extension of water main from Lakeland Hills to The Shores will result in an extremely long (7000', or 1.3 miles) dead-end line. At the far end of the main is a business, W ater Works Beach Club, that will require necessary fire protection. In order to maintain 1000 gpm fire flow, the pipe diameter needs to increase from the existing 8" to a 10" inside-diametel pIpe. PER1VIITS It will be necessary to obtain a permit from the MDH (Minnesota Department of Health) for the water main extension. A permit is required from Anoka County to install water main within their right-of-way. It may also be necessary to get approvals from the DNR and Rice Creek Watershed for construction near Centerville Lake and Peltiet Lake. EASEMENTS Most of the proposed construction will take place within public right-of-\vay or existing easements. However, service pipes will extend to property lines and require small temporary CSAH 14 Water Main Extension Page 4 easements at vanous locations along the highway. It is assumed property owners will grant temporary easements/temporary access during the construction, at no cost to the project. COST SUlYIMAR Y A detailed cost estimate of the proposed water main extension along CSAH 14 is shown in Appendix A. Unit prices are based on similar type projects bid in the Metro area over the past several years. Directional drilling contractors were also contacted to offer expertise on the water main installation. The Total Project cost is $169,092.00, which includes 10% contingencies and 20% indirect costs (administrative, engineering design and inspection, testing, and legal). PROJECT SCHEDULE City Council order Feasibility Study Present Feasibility Report Informational Meeting Public Hearing, Council order Plans/Specs Submit Plans for Council approval, order advertisement Open bids Award Contract Begin Construction Complete Construction Assessment Hearing ASSESSMENTS October 24, 2001 November 28,2001 December 2001 January 9,2002 March 13, 2002 April 18, 2002 April 24, 2002 May 2002 August 2002 November 2002 The costs associated with this project can be funded through a combination of several possible sources. They incluJe current property owners, The Shores development, and Centerville Tnmk \Vater Fund. Several assessmenUfunding scenarios are provided in Appendix B. As shown on Figure 3, a significant proportion of the water main route borders prope11y thar can not be assessed. On the east end, the Lakeland Hills development has already paid for water CSAH 14 Water Main Extension Page 5 maIn. Several hundred feet also borders wetlands and Centerville Lake. At the west end, both Peltier Lake and Centerville Lake are adjacent to the proposed water main, with no property to assess. It is felt that residential properties along CSAH 14 all receive equal benefit to connect to City water. The "average" lot, that can't be further subdivided, should be counted as one parcel. The large parcel south of the CSAH 14 - Peltier Lake Drive intersection would be divided into "equivalent" lots, based on the average area and front footage of residential properties in the area. The average front foot works out to 155 feet, so the large parcel gets 5 equivalent lots. Waterworks Beach Club is zoned commercial and would receive significant benefit from the new water main, since the building could be sprinklered. Based on previolls assessments to commercial properties for utility extensions, and the insurance benefit associated with sprinkling, it is proposed to assign a $20,000 assessment to the Waterworks site. It would not be counted as an equivalent lot in the calculation. Using an "equivalent lot basis" for assessments, there are a total of 15 lots. The Shores development is not included in the 15. Water service can be provided to each of the lots. The City's policy in the past regarding oversized water mains, is to fund the difference in cost between standard residential size main and the larger diameter pipe. In this case, it is necessary to extend 12" high density polyethylene pipe rather than 6 or 8" diameter pipe. The approximate cost difference is $15.00 per lineal foot for water main and $500.00 each for gate valves. This calculates as follows: 2,600 LF x $15.00/LF = $39,000 3 valves x $SOO.OO/EA = 1,500 Subtotal $40,SOO + 10% contingencies 4,050 Total Construction $44,550 + 20% indirect 8,910 TOTAL TRUNK COST $53,460 CSAH 14 ~jiater iYlain Extension Page 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the City of Centerville Comprehensive Plan. The following recommendations are presented for consideration by the City Council: 1. That this report be adopted as a guide for installation of water main to serve The Shores Development and existing properties along CSAH 14. 2. That a meeting be held with property owners to discuss the improvements and proposed assessments, and receive input from residents. CSAH 14 Water Mail! Extension Page 7 t erville Established 1857 Appendix A APPENDIX A Cost Estimate CSAH 14 Water Main Item Description 12" HOPE water main - directional drill 6" PVC water main 12" gate valve Valve rod extension Hydrant w/valve Connect to existing 8" PVC Fittings Clearing and grubbing Traffic control 1" Copper service 1" Copper service - directional drill 1 " curb stop and box 1 " corporation stop Unit Qty Unit Price LF 2600 40.00 LF 50 25.00 EA 3 1,000.00 EA 6 150.00 EA 3 2,000.00 EA 1 600.00 LB 2000 1.50 LS 1 500.00 LS 1 2,000.00 LF 100 12.00 LF 200 20.00 EA 11 75.00 EA 11 75.00 Subtotal 10% Contingencies TOTAL Construction Cost 20% Eng., Inspec., Admin. TOTAL PROJECT Total Price $104,000.00 $1,250.00 $3,000.00 $900.00 $6,000.00 $600.00 $3,000.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 $1,200.00 $4,000.00 $825.00 $825.00 $128,100.00 $12,810.00 $140,910.00 $28,182.00 $169,092.00 terville Established 1857 Appendix B APPENDIX B Proposed Assessments CSAH 14 Water Main Lakeland Hills to The Shores Ootion 1 Option 2 Front Equivalent Develooer 0% DeveloJer 25% 3 Address Footaqe Lot $ Per Lot 1 Assessment $ Per Lot2 Assessment 1 7238 Main St. 135 1 $6,375 $6,375 $4,448.00 $4,448.00 2 7240 Main St. 100 1 $6,375 $6,375 $4,448.00 $4,448.00 3 7241 Main St. 225 1 $6,375 $6,375 $4,448.00 $4,448.00 4 7244 Main St. 160 1 $6,375 $6,375 $4,448.00 $4,448.00 5 7246 Main St. 150 1 $6,375 $6,375 $4,448.00 $4,448.00 6 7247 Main St. 140 1 $6,375 $6,375 $4,448.00 $4,448.00 7 7250 Main St. 189 1 $6,375 $6,375 $4,448.00 $4,448.00 8 7252 Main St. 190 1 $6,375 $6,375 $4,448.00 $4,448.00 9 1540 Peltier Lake Dr. 240 1 $6,375 $6,375 $4,448.00 $4,448.00 10 7261 Main St. 210 1 $6,375 $6,375 $4,448.00 $4,448.00 11 7265 Main St. (Defoe) 770 5 $6,375 $31,877 $4,448.00 $22,241.00 Subtotal 15 ------------- $95,632 ---------.....-- $66,724.00 12 7281 Main St. (Defoe) 200 0 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Subtotal ---- 15 ------------- $115,632 ------------- $86,724.00 The Shores (Rehbein) 0 $0 $28,908.00 TOTAL 15 $115,632 $115,632.00 1 $95,632/15 = $6,375 2 $66,724/15 = $4,448 3 $169,092 - $53,460 = $115,632 $115,632 x 25% = $28,908 0) rf ~~ \))\ \) , '1;); ~ (/Jf, ~2 V 110 f i>~.? ,,. 0 ~ fJ."" . ~,P ~~ / :t.} JY ~ ~ \ k,r .} 11> \fA (/ tV tf ;/ ? Summary (Option 2) City of Centerville trunk 10 residents @ $4,448 each Rich Defoe: $22,241 + $20,000 = The Shores development. TOTAL $53,460 $44,483 $42,241 $28,908 $169,092 26% 25% 17% 32% t erville Established 1857 Fi oures b . CITY OF L1NO In ... " C ..... o z ... ... o > >- U , terv'l Esta.blishet LOCATION PLAN In ~ ... " C ... 0 Z - ... ... 0 > >- - U Bi B~ .' i J/ '1 1,,1 c~':/.;~c~J ,[ ~"'.'o"c_. ! ~ ! !: I L1NO LAKES II t[;fO~l :)P-::-; .J:; '--- In ... " C ... o z ... o > .... u :d(: ~ Bonestroo AtJ! Rosene iii Anderlik d. ""'J . Associates CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA C.S.A.H. 14 WATER MAIN EXTENSION 6160 1123FO 1.0we NOV. 2001 FIGURE 1 COM~ ---- ~ ~ ---~~-~------ ---' ---- ---- ---- CEN TER VlLLE LAKE \ ______________--1--____________ -- ' 1 o 150 ~O \-".""",.. __r~ Scale in feet )ROPOSED WATER MAIN 2 2 ] 4- 7 0 V:.Y 2 ] 1] FIGURE 2 J/~ Bonestroo Rosene ili Anderlik do , \J. Associates CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA C.S.A.H. 14 WATER MAIN EXTENSION 61601123F02.DWG ~JOV. 2001 CO~H ------ \\;;- ~ ~- ~-~ ~- ------ ------ ------ 10S TRACT E 441 ~ f:' , 7238l 1 CE/V TEIf j :al:D.IIIIi11i4.__.w-........_______..._...lIIIU__________~.... ...________:11-4_ 15114 ~ o 100 200 ~-=-- l Scale in feet -~ ,,41~ Bonestroo It_1Jl Rosene ~~; Anderlik & ",~ \J. Associates ASSESSMEI\JTS CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA C.S.p,..H. 14 WATER l'v1AIN EXTEi\ISION FIGURE 3 6160112JF03.DWG NOV. 2001 c 0 ~I tv MEMO DATE: November 28,2001 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kim Moore-Sykes RE: 1798 Main Street - Mill Road Extension Vacation ............................................................................ The Planning and Zoning Commission considered a request from Lawrence and Teri Perron and Clay Alcock for the City to vacate the Mill Road extension and return the property to private ownership at their October 2,2001 meeting. It recently came to Staff's attention that this issue was inadvertently left off the October 24,2001 Council meeting agenda. The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the requested vacation to the City Council. The attached information outlines the issue of the two property owners requesting the vacation. L,i\.WREl',TCE AND TERI PERRON 1798 MAIN STREET CENTERVILLE, MN 55038 651.429.5280 v!)~ G ~~, j{ : ~/g l~~ ~. August 26, 2001 Reference: Vacating of Mill Road extension south of Main Street City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centervi1le, 1'vlli :55038 ..,:.y c:r'( \~1 ~ :2~>t r~j \ l, To Whom It May Concem: Since 1979, we have owned the two adjacent pieces of property that once included the land now know as the extension to Mill Road. The pieces together formed Peterson's Addition to Centerville #2. I have been infonned by the City of Centerville that this land could be vacated and retumed to the private community. From what [ have been able to find out through city and county resources, when Peterson's Addition #2 was fanned, land was given to the City of Centerville for the future purpose of building a road south across Clear Water Creek. Tnat reason no longer exits because of the way the development and roads were built south of Clear Water Creek. Also, the vacation of that land should be to where fhe land first came from- Peterson's Addition #2- which we own. Because the City of Centerville has never considered this a true road, the expense of maintenance, snow removal, etc.; have been done at my expense. I did not consider this a major problem for many years because it was the only way to get to my garage and the land east of'i\/llll Road (lot #13 of Peterson's Addition #1) was considered non-buildable land by the City of Centerv'ille (less than 100 ft frontage). Since the mid 90' s, Mill Road extension has been a constant irritation and point of dispute. In the mid 90's, fonner owner o[Peterson's Addition #1, lot #13 (Lee Stevens) sta.l1ed trying to sell his property. I approached him, but could 110t come to an agreement because of the status of buildable VS. non-buildable property. There were several city meetings. The City of CenterviIle eventually grmlted the right to build due to the fact that Peterson's Addition #1 had 50 ft. frontage laws. The land was now considered buildable land, but did not meet setback regulations for a comer lot. This meant the land was more expensive, the City of Centenrille could get more tax money, but you couldn't put a house on it. Needless to say, the land did not sell. Lee Stevens again petirioned the City of Centerville. I-lis point was simple, if the land was considered buildable because it was part of Peterson's Addition #1 andMiH Road extension was not given to the City of Centervi11e until after Peterson's Addition #2 was fonned, tJ.'1e setback requirements should not apply. There were several more city meeting, but the City of Centerville eventually granted a variance so a house could be built. Lee Stevens could not sell the property ~l1d decided to build bis own house. But the problems did not stop there. LAWRENCE AND TERI PERRON 1798 MAn-,J STREET CENTERVILLE, MN 55038 651.429.5280 While Lee Stevens was building on the pwperty, the City of Centenrille decided that the driveway, which was approved to exit onto Main Street by Anoka County, should be relocated to exit onto .Mill Road extension. I approached the Civj of Centenrille and was told that they still expected Mill Road to eventually cross Clear Water Creek and be used in the development south of Clear Water Creek. I tried to explain t.he problems/alternatives to their decision- The City of Centerville did not own all the land to Clear Water Creek, I did. Rice Creek Watershed deemed the south side of Clear Water Creek a wetland area. A D NR approved culvert would not be cost effective to install being access could be done a block west without a culvert. The maintenance of Mill Road extension would be twofold, who would maintain it? The City of Centerville held steadfast in their decision, but would allow the driveway to be moved if the land (Mill Road extension) was retumed to the public. TIle land was sold to Clay jiJcock a few years ago. We have discussed the vacating ofMi11 Road extension several times to no avail. Clay's position (or more so his brother-in-law, Bob) has been that there is no room along the west side ofIlis house to store things and therefore wants 50% of lV1ill Road extension. My response was/is that if the city would give the property back to me, I would give him some land; say ten feet, from nor only Mill Road extension, but also my own land, to make a nice, straight boundary all the way to the creek. TIlls would give him plenty of room to access the rest of his land to the east along Clear Water Creek. Add to this, changing his driveway to exit onto Main Street, and he would solve his parking dilemma. Mill Road extension is not the only problem I face with Clay. Because of his sister, brother in law, and their two children liviitg with him, the abnormal amount of possessions being accumulated on his property has become an issue. Last count there were 5 cars, a fish house, an 8 ft. and a 16 ft. utility trailer, a 20 ft. mobile home, a 16 ft. boat, 2 rider lawn mowers, 2 at'! vehicles, and a fhll size tractor. These are all parked on a combination of his driveway and 1\-lill Road extension. Also, trespassing has become an issue. Last year I found Bob rota-tilling a garden on my property llild this year I hired a survey crew to prove that the land the children were using as a playground was also my property. In retrospect, I emma! change the fact that a house was builr, or [hat Clay and his relatives own a lot of stuff'Nhat I can uy to do is offer solutions to existing problems. TIle City of Centerville no longer needs [vfill Road extension or the extra expense in maintaining it. On a positive note, once given back to me, the City of Cent en rille call11OW l:a,'X the property. The vacation of Mill Road extension to me, minus ten feet on the east side, plus ten feet of my land south ofl'v1i11 Road extension to Clear Water Creek, would enable Clay plenty of access to the rest afms land without trespassing on other property. Moving Clay-'s driveway to exit onto l'vlain Street would also benefit in improved access to bis garage. Sincerely, Larry Penon ~ ~ ~ (D ~ ~ tb = ~ -~ -5'~' ~ i#j 10M" I""t- ~ ,.;. ~ = ~ ~ f""+ o ~ ~ ~ ~ i-i" ~ ~ ~ t,_ -- .~ · ~J t \~ ~ ~ '~; ! r-;-! jf ~.- -- ..~. "'ilit,*"",,,~" .~~ ~.' ....... 'i '-J . L .......,,'" ''-'" ,~ n - fI) ~ ~ ~ ~ (b ""t r :'; 1,.1 f '.' ......1........ ' ~. r (j ~ > ~ i'fj . ~ ( n o (j ~ r- " ~ L"~,.,~, ~~ t, " ,.; .~, ~ .' .~ TIJ I '1<1 :,1 .jt..,,~ i '.~ !D ~ '-&; [ * i-3. t"""'" ~~.~. ~Z .~ ~QI zS2 I:::' .~.- ,J ~. IBIIIIIIl N ~. ~ .. ~,~- -~ " ~ l l-l ~ ...-.. .~. ~ ~ Ct\ ~ ~ ~ '" 1i I .~ i I ~ i I I L ~ !t I ( , ~. ~ l l'; ~ '" .~ ~ I .i... ~J ". { l ~ " I :~ -rn~ ,:":w?~' - !~r ~ Z lu ". .~ r ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ m I .,. ~ '... I t ~ . ~ ~ i ~ ~~- ~~. I I '; '~.'; I B. .~ ~. ~ c-J ~ ~~ .... ~ :-- ~ ;: ~ ~ o e ~ , .(t.) -R\~~U ~ i"'t ~ o := I ~s:* ~~~ $; n.' '..'.. O~ .'. Z~ . b .\\ -:- ,J ,~~ ""'~. N . .... '. ~..'..'..: ~~.~ 6/'/ 'Jf..' I '.1 I .. ,II .. ..... " l- t-I J L '".. ,. ~.., MILL . - ~ROAD'- - .... ~ ~ ~ Q. ~'" !'"'t ~;) 10 = ~ f-al .~ ~ ~....... ;i: ~' f fa-i N .- ,~ >>~~~. ~ ji 1 .~- P-i ~ .~~ .,~ ;"nl ~ ~. i-' o $ ._ "_. .'."" ..~ .....'i · ....-..~ \0 i .~. I ; ~ ,~- co ~~ ~~-. ,~ :.~'\:;>~ ~ ;- '%'4 0"'\ u ~ ~ ; .1. ' t ~ .~ j .~. I ! ." .~ j .~ j ~ , I I .~ iit f i '" t J ."" .'$ ~: ~. " I ~ i Ii I t ~.~"".,n~ ;[ ,_,"","i.Ii(lo;r'miitll&.I~._ j~r . ~I ~ Zit t .i I ~ I I ~I .~.'" . fi (IJ ~ i m l- I ~ I i ~ .~ .~ I '$J: f ~ ~ ',\;:- ~. ~ ~ ~ ~. ~. !i j ~- :~ ~: it >~ ;< " _..~ 'J . .._ , ' ~'-'<'. ~. i:--l i O,_J L_ "",'-_. _ I ~ \0 & I . ~ ~ .~_._. ~~ I 1 co I f I '_ ~ d' t .. i-- _ ........ j II- - -- , '. , ' ""'1 ~ ... .J ~.., .1,.'..... I.,. L '-'_. ,_ ;j( N i ~ . . 1 ., . , 0'\ j .~.~ :i ~..~ ~ i.Il rD ~ ~ ~ ~ (t ~ /oM" rD n (D !;IJ o ~. ~ ~ ~ !W ~ ~ o a ~ to 1""'!- (D i"'1 ~ o =: .... ~ ~ ~ Q. iBlfl i/""i- ." 10 = I I I ~. ;r ~. l +- I~r . ~l -I q:..~~. F-i ~ ~. Zi ~ , t ''''.......: i r:.n J P-l I I~ l P-l. """ '.. ;:rJ.'. ~ m i .~.m ll' I ~ I I '" l .~ ~ ~ ~ J=ot i-t o =: - ~ L ~ ~., l , ~. i ~ .- -- I'...... - ~. . , t! J F (") o u ~ ~. .~ .... ~i i' I I I I ~ i' I ~ ~ ~ ~: .~ f f ~. ~. .~. 'f I .~. f * ~. ~- ~ $ I '&. " t t ~~\'l.\~' ~ r :it ~ . ~". ~. .~. ~ $ I ~ :~ ~. i ~ m ~ it. ~, i ~ (t ~ ~ i;IlIIl > ~ ~ o :-. ~ -- ~ ~ ~ ~ >-~ ~ -.'" 10 = ~ ~ ~ rD ~ rD ~ ~ o = n - ~ ~ .., ~ ..... l'l >-t (j .., t'll (t ~ .... ~ ~ ~ ~ _3 ~ ~.. o = *i:: N ~ ~ oc . . ...... '-.-," .~. ~..~J >, ~ "-"..' t:: I '.- it < \f ~ ,;,,g,,.,,.=- :rr-- ~..~~., '..'.~,'.=i i.l1 f f , . I I . ~ I f ~ t ,.~. i ,~ r I w .~ .~ ;4K .~ ~. ~ ~ I i i jl t :~ l1!. I I I~i ;~I ~ Z I'. ~ . ~... ~~.* r,':;.A.' , ,'f !! W-J I ~~ I I m .~ I trJ~ j ~ j l . ~ .~ W .~. ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ I~ ~ 'i .~ ... ~ I ~ :: .i~' ~)il ,"" "'''.,&......yj..... ~l ',.~.' ~ .f , l ~ ~ 1 f d, t 1 ~ h_ Prop'Ds~: d new bDUID.,dary line ,f ~ \: Il.......~.: f ~ W't,... .,.:......,....'f...... ti .~ t' ~; ~: f ~i: x: ::-~: % ~. l' ~; ~.- h iiI ~: .:t I= X_oJ 1,:\,:<, ~: -~.: I ;.:..~ ~. t :~- ~~-~ t;': ,_ t. *~; *: ~ :~- r,,:~. t ~i ~~ ~: K t ~ ~ ::;: II ::~ ~. .1 "'* ~ -t ~: ~'i-' (j ., " , IIi ~ ~ .~ ! ~l" ~ _. i;j} ...... -~ == ~ ~ = Q. ~ ,-t. = l-t n ~ o c b ; Q. ~ ~ """"" ",,-. ~ ~ :~ i* ~ ~: ;t: f :~: ~ ~. ~ ~. .~ :* i :~: .~, .S~~).).'SiK....;.~J..~~: ~').'i:"..;;:;~::;:>..,,'~,~: .:~~~.,.~""-':~!\.~:: :~~,~~~>~ -~')."'-.......~\....'l:-',.~:' I' l I i ~i,rIl I' ::.: .Ti .::r' :::'''1 ~ t.. i [ 1 ~ ~ :t~~ " . ~'!asf i ~. - ~ 1 0 Uj ~ ~. 01-1 ~ ~ ' >-t ~ 1 ~~ I- I... i : ~ f rJ. .. :..'_.:._.'~C__I .. '__.l)m:)).~ Garage i I 1. ~ ~ ~ ii :,WULIIII_ lli '....:.u iLl .' .."Jif~p!ll1L~~.... !VJ'!' 1 ~~ -'- .1. Road .~~:=::.'l.l~)!li"'~,'!ll' 1):"lY~'t1 l It }::.:nlil~ /t<", ') ,.~.;.:sf:" {;:~'01'~ .!T.rj_~:-:R~.~:W~~r '-:- " ~ ~ ~ ., . " ~ {!: ~ ~ 1 ~ " . :...:...............,~~-. ~F ~, I: 1: 1: ~ a ~ t ~ """"~ ;t $ '...."....i~':i.... '1' i i' f I '~.J>. I ~.' "'..b. .i. ~... y;~" ~ 9 ll' ~: , ' M.~;'''''''''~~'~Ar ~: ".' .... . " ./i 1L ~;-UCOCk H:ouse ^""", ' ,-~~:-~~~~~~"\\-;.~:::.::~. ~(QIM ~ i .~ ~ ~ 'i i .1......': . . I ~ ~. ~ ~ ~. = Cfj. ~rt. .Tn ~ (b rD ,... To Ule city manager City of Centerville, WJl. 55038 13 September, 200 1 From Clay P. Alcock 1806 1VIai.n st Cente~lle,1V1n. 55038 _:~ To 'Whom It May Concern: I am writing tIlis letter at~er ta1ki..n.g to Paul, your building inspector about the possible vacation of a road- way easment to the south of the intersection of MaL'} s1. and lVlill rd. Between my property and that of Larry Perrons. I would like to propose that the land be diveded equally between us. So as to asure that we both have adiquete access to our property and ga.-rages. Being my understanding is that you told the builder of my residence Lee Stevens that he had to change tile driveway plans to come out Onto tllis easment wh.ich in turn raised the cost of nlY house by having to pave part of the easment to meet city cede. r have also noticed that it apperrs that I can not access my back yard from my wheel chair with out leaving my proper; as it stands now do to some vaIieances ill how the building was located on the property. Sincerely, Clay P. Alcock 4. Comprehensive Sign Plan - Uptown Center Ms. Katie Newman told the Committee she was told by Mr. Drilling that she would need to seek approval for deviation from the sign plan approved by the City. She then explained the type of sign she wished to use. Connnissioner DeVine indicated that Mr. Drilling is only allowed a certain number of square feet for signage and said the City has not seen a sign plan for the building. The Committee clarified that Ms. Newman would need to speak to Mr. Drilling concerning approval of her sign. The Committee also told Ms. Newman that Mr. Drilling needed to come to the City with a comprehensive sign plan for approval. 5. Vacating Mill Road Extension South of Main Street (Mr. and Mrs. Perron. 1798 Main Street and Mr. Clay Alcock. 1806 Main Street) Commissioner De Vine indicated he did not see a reason that Mill Road would go south. Commissioner Wilharber explained that the City planned for the roadway based on the County wanting roads to be across from each other. He then indicated that Eagle Pass is located where the tree fann used to be and it appears that Mill Road will not be going south. He further indicated that, if the City vacates the roadway, the property would be split evenly to each ofthe property owners' as was platted at the time. Mr. Palzer indicated that state statute dictates how the property will be split up and that will be based on how it was platted at the time. He further indicated that both parties have expressed an interest in proceeding with the vacation of the roadway. Commissioner Wilharber noted the residents would be paying for the costs to vacate the roadway. Motion bv Commissionell" DeVine. seconded by Commissioner Wilharber to recommend to Council that the Catv move forward with the vacation of the Mill Road Extension. AU in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Lot Split -NIT. and Mrs. David West from Mr. Alcock (180 Main Street) Mr. West explained there is a signed purchase agreement for the land but said the County is requiring City approval of the lot split before the documents can be recorded with the County. Motion bv Comm2~sioneJl" Wilhall"ber. se~onded bv Commissioner DeVine to recommend to Council approval oCtile lot split as requested in the letter from Mr. West dated September 25,2001. AU in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Page 12 of 15 ~ Bonestroo ~ Rosene 1\1 Anderlik & 1~. Associates Engineers <. Architects Owner: Citv of Centerville, 1880 Main St., Centerville, MN 55038 Date: November 13,2001 For Period: 9/18/2001 to 11/13/2001 Reauest No: 1 Contractor: Park Construction Companv 7900 Beech St NE, Minneapolis, MN, 55432-1795 CONTRACTOR'S REQUEST FOR PAYMENT PHEASANT MARSH UTILITY AND STREET IMPS BRA FILE NO. 616-00-117 SUMMARY Original Contract Amount $ 726,615.90 2 Change Order - Addition $ 0.00 3 Change Order - Deduction $ 0.00 4 Revised Contract Amount $ 726,615.90 5 Value Completed to Date $ 305,819.50 6 Material on Hand $ 0.00 7 Amount Earned $ 305,819.50 8 Less Retainage 5% $ 15,290.98 9 Subtotal $ 290,528.53 10 Less Amount Paid Previously $ 0.00 11 Liquidated damages - $ 0.00 12 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. $ 290,528.53 Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLlK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ /7 . II ,/...;J. .' L?; /0'.. ....... / f' ..' IVttJl..-t.c /,6U-I_L:.{....f~iVlfl &:~ / Approved by Contractor: PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ~ 2 'I! ~ ~--;~ -le.~ IJ Approved by Owner: CITY OF CENTERVILLE Specified Contract Completion Date: June 28, 2002 Date: 616C0117REQ1.xls Contract Unit Quantity Amount No. Item Unit Quantity Price to Date to Date Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer 1 Mobilization LS 1 34000.00 0.5 $17,000.00 2 8" PVC sanitary sewer, SDR 35, 8'-10' deep LF 225 25.65 225 55,771.25 3 8" PVC sanitary sewer, SDR 35, 10'-12' deep LF 100 25.65 100 52,565.00 4 8" PVC sanitary sewer, SDR 35,12'-14' deep LF 705 25.65 705 518,083.25 5 8" PVC sanitary sewer, SDR 35,14'-16' deep LF 340 25.65 140 53,591.00 5 12" PVC sanitary sewer, SOR 35, 10'-12' deep LF 1020 27.75 1020 528,305.00 7 12" PVC sanitary sewer, SOR 35,12'-14' deep LF 1022 27.75 1022 528,360.50 8 12" PVC sanitary sewer, SOR 35, 14'-16' deep LF 570 27.75 532 S14,763.00 9 4" PVC, Sch. 40 riser pipe LF 50 19.00 57 S1,083.00 10 8" PVC force main LF 110 24.25 110 S2,667.50 11 8" x 4" PVC wye EA 23 75.00 14 S1,050.00 12 12" x 4" PVC wye EA 14 130.00 21 S2,730.00 13 4' diameter sanitary MH, 8' deep EA 19 1900.00 18 534,200.00 14 4' diameter sanitary manhole overdepth LF 76 145.00 50 57,250.00 15 Construct manhole over existing pipe EA 1 2100.00 $0.00 16 Improved pipe foundation LF 3982 1.90 1000 S1,900.00 17 Seeding AC 1 1300.00 50.00 18 Closed circuit TV inspection LF 3982 0.60 $0.00 19 Clearing and grubbing LS 1 5000.00 0.75 53.750.00 Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer 5173,069.50 Part 2 - Water Main 20 12" PVC water main LF 3220 23.00 3223 574,129.00 21 8" PVC water main LF 160 23.00 160 S3,680.00 22 6" PVC water main LF 600 23.00 557 S12,811.00 23 12" gate valve and box EA 5 1300.00 5 S6,500.00 24 8" gate valve and box EA 3 760.00 3 52,280.00 25 6" gate valve and box EA 6 565.00 6 S3,390.00 26 Install hydrant EA 4 2000.00 4 S8,000.00 27 Connect to existing water main EA 1 600.00 1 5600.00 28 Ductile iron fittings LB 10000 0.85 9000 S7,650.00 29 Improved pipe foundation LF 2000 1.90 50.00 30 Remove bituminous driveway SY 20 2.80 $0.00 31 Sawing bituminous pavement LF 20 5.00 $0.00 32 3" Type 41 A, bit. driveway pavement SY 20 28.65 $0.00 33 Seeding AC 0.4 1300.00 $0.00 34 Salvage and reinstall gravel driveway SY 830 4.00 830 S3,320.00 35 Salvage and reinstall 24" RCP LS 1 670.00 1 5670.00 36 Aggregate base, Class 5 TN 150 12.00 $0.00 37 12" pipe restraint EA 48 115.00 48 S5,520.00 38 8" pipe restraint EA 14 100.00 14 S1,400.00 39 6" pipe restraint EA 28 100.00 28 S2.800.00 Total Part 2 - Water Main 5132,750.00 Part 3 - SerJices 40 1" corporation stop E,l>. 22 125.00 $0.00 41 1" curb stop and box EA 22 135.00 $0.00 42 1" Type "K" copper water service LF 900 18.00 $0.00 43 4" PVC, Sch. 40 service pipe LF 1000 20.00 50.00 Total Part 3 - Services 50.00 Part 4 - Storm Sewer 44 12" RCP storm sewer, Class 5 LF 260 28.50 $0.00 45 15" RCP storm sewer, Class 5 LF 990 30.00 $0.00 46 27" RCP storm sewer, Class 3 LF '197 46.65 $0.00 47 30" HOPE storm sewer LF 134 35.00 $0.00 48 18" HOPE storm sewer LF 129 20.65 $0.00 49 15" HOPE storm sewer LF 143 17.00 $0.00 50 12" HOPE storm sewer LF 249 16.00 $0.00 51 4' diameter storm CBMH EA 6 1500.00 $0.00 52 5' diameter storm CBMH EA 3 2400.00 $0.00 53 Skimmer structure EA 1 1100.00 SO.OO 54 2' :< 3' catch basin EA 4 1400.00 SO.OO 55 3D" HOPE flared end section with trash guard EA 1 1085.00 SO.OO 56 27" RCP flared end section, including trash guard EA 1 1300.00 $0.00 57 18" HOPE flared end section with trash guard EA 1 345.00 $0.00 616CO 117RE01.xls Contract Unit Quantity Amount No. Item Unit Quantity Price to Date to Date 58 15" RCP flared end section EA 3 360.00 $0.00 59 15" HOPE nared end section with trash guard EA 1 265.00 SO.OO 60 12" HOPE flared end section EA 2 160.00 $0.00 61 Class III random riprap CY 115 60.00 $0.00 62 Improved pipe foundation LF 700 1.90 $0.00 63 Seeding AC 0.5 1300.00 $0.00 64 Silt fence, regular LF 300 5.00 $0.00 65 Hay bales LF 200 7.00 $0.00 66 Protection of catch basin in street EA 12 50.00 $0.00 67 Ditch excavation LF 300 4.00 $0.00 Total Part 4 - Storm Sewer $0.00 Part 5 - Street 68 Mill bituminous pavement l' wide LF 100 4.70 $0.00 69 Subgrade preparation SY 9100 1.00 $0.00 70 Geotextile fabric, Type V SY 9100 1.75 $0.00 71 Select granular borrow (CV) CY 5500 5.50 $0.00 72 Aggregate base, Class 5 TN 3100 12.00 $0.00 73 Type 31 bituminous base course TN 870 30.70 $0.00 74 Bituminous wear course, Type 41 (2002) TN 690 34.95 $0.00 75 Bituminous material for tack coat GAL 400 1.60 $0.00 76 Surmountable concrete curb and gutter LF 4200 7.40 $0.00 77 Water for dust control 1 000 GAL 100 20.00 $0.00 78 4" Perforated polyethylene pipe LF 4200 4.85 $0.00 79 Type III barricade EA 6 150.00 $0.00 80 Skidsteer (bobcat) with operator HR 10 75.00 $0.00 81 Street sweeper w/pick up broom & operator HR 10 100.00 $0.00 82 Seeding AC 1.5 1300.00 $0.00 83 4" concrete sidewalk SY 8000 2.35 $0.00 84 Aggregate base, Class 5 - trail TN 250 12.00 $0.00 85 Bituminous wear course, Type 41A, Pathway (2002) TN 75 51.50 $0.00 Total Part 5 - Street SO.OO Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer Total Part 2 - Water Main Total Part 3 - Services Total Part 4 - Storm Sewer Tota\ Part 5 - Street Total Work Completed To Date $173,069.50 $132,750.00 $0.00 $0.00 SO.OO $305,819.50 61600117REQ1.x[s PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER CITY OF CENTERVILLE BRA FILE NO. 616-00-117 CONTRACTOR PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CHANGE ORDERS No. Date Description Amou nt Total Change Orders PAYMENT SUMMARY No. From 09/18/2001 To 11/13/01 Payment 290,528.53 Retainage 15,290.98 Completed 305,819.50 Material on Hand Total Payment to Date $290,528.53 Ori~inal Contract $726,615.90 Retainaqe Pay No. 1 15,290.98 Chanqe Orders Total Amount Earned $305,819.50 Revised Contract $726,615.90 61600117REQ1xls BRUCE E. RYDEN, C.F:1. 2078 WILLOW CIRCLE CENTERVILLE, MN 55038-8773 65 1-429-2693 DUNoR03023@AOL.COM . ~ '<f 1-;' ~ 3 I OCTOBER 200 I COMMISSIONER MARGARET LANGFIELD ANOKA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONER 2 100 THIRD AVENUE ANOKA, MN 55303 STOP SIGNS AT 35E AND COUNTY ROAD I 4 DEAR COMMISSIONER LANGFIELD: I WOULD LIKE TO TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO ONCE AGAIN ADDRESS THE VERY HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS THAT CONTINUE TO EXIST AT INTERSTATE 35E AND ANOKA COUNTY ROAD I 4. As YOU KNOW THE CITIZENS OF OUR COMMUNITIES HAVE REQUESTED THAT SOMETHING BE DONE BEFORE SOMEONE GET KILLED AT THIS CROSSROAD. You TOLD US THAT A STUDY WOULD BE DONE, BUT NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE AND IT IS GETTING MORE DANGEROUS EVERYDAY. AT RUSH HOURS IT IS NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE TO GET ONTO COUNTY ROAD 14 AS THE TRAFFIC COMING OVER THE BRIDGE IS USUALLY DOING AT LEAST 50 MILES PER HOUR (THE SPEED LIMIT). WHEN YOU ATIEMPT TO GET ONTO THE COUNTY ROAD THE TRAFFIC COMING OVER THE BRIDGE IS VERY DIFFICULT TO SEE AND YOU HAVE TO TAKE TOO GREAT A RISK JUST TO GET ONTO THE ROAD. WHEN A SEMI-TRUCK AND TRAILER ARE WAITING TO GET ONTO THE ROAD IT IS NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM TO DO SO SAFELY. As YOU KNOW REHBIEN BLACK DIRT IS HAULING A LARGE QUANTITY OF BLACK DIRT OUT OF lINO LAKES JUST NORTH OF CO. RD. 14 AND THERE ARE MANY TRUCKS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT. ALSO THERE IS A TRANSPORTATION COMPANY ON 20TH IN CENTERVILLE THAT HAS A NUMBER OF SEMIS THAT ENTER ONTO CO. RD. 14. IT IS NOT UNUSUAL FOR TRAFFIC EXITING 1-35E TO BACK UP ONTO THE FREEWAY SHOULDER WHILE WAITING FOR THE SEMI TO GET ON TO CO. RD. 14. I BELIEVE THAT ALL OF THIS COULD BE RESOLVED BY INSTALLING TWO STOP SIGNS. ONE AT THE EAST END OF THE BRIDGE FOR THE EASTBOUND TRAFFIC AND ONE AT THE WEST END OF THE BRIDGE FOR THE WESTBOUND TRAFFIC. THIS WOULD FORCE THE TRAFFIC COMING OVER THE BRIDGE TO STOP AND ALLOW ON-COMING VEHICLES AN OPPORTUNITY TO ENTER ON TO CO. RD. 14 SAFELY. THIS IS NOT A MAJOR PROJECT AND SHOULDN'T TAKE A TRAFFIC ENGINEER TO FIGURE THIS OUT. .JUST A COUPLE OF COUNTY EMPLOYEES WITH A COUPLE OF SIGNS. PLEASE DO WHAT YOU CAN TO GET THIS DANGEROUS CONDITION CORRECTED BEFORE SOMEONE IS SERIOUSLY INJURED OR KILLED AT THIS INTERSECTION. SINCERELY YOURS, ~~q~ BRUCE E. RYDEN CC: CENTERVtLLE CITY COUNCIL City of Hugo 5524 Upper 146th Street North Hugo, MN 55038-9367 PHONE: (651) 429-6676 FAX: (651) 426-2859 EMAIL: info@ci.hugo.mn.us February 24, 2000 Walter L. Stoltzman, Mayor Becky Petryk, Council Member Ward 1 James Leroux, Council Member Ward 2 Chuck Haas, Council Member Ward 3 Debra Barnes, Council Member at Large ATTN: Linda Waite Smith, City Administrator City ofLino Lakes 600 Tower Center Parkway Lino Lakes, :rvn-J 55014 ATTN: Mr. Jim March, City Administrator City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 RE: MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT Dear Linda and Jim: Enclosed is a proposed Mutual Aid Agreement, between the City of Hugo, the City of Centerville, and the City of Lino Lakes, for the provision of emergency public works assistance between the communities, Hugo's maintenance supervisor, Chris Petree, has been in contact with your public works superintendents regarding this issue, Please review this document, and provide me with any comments you may have. If you find the Agreement acceptable, let me know, and I will provide it to my Council for approval. RAM/mac CITY OF CENTERVILLE ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY OF HUGO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY OF LINO LAKES ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT This Agreement made and entered into this day of 2000, by and between the CITY OF CENTERVILLE (hereinafter referred to as "Centerville"), the CITY OF HUGO (hereinafter referred to as "Hugo"), and the CITY OF LINO LAKES (hereinafter referred to as "Lino Lakes"). WITNESS: WHEREAS, all of the parties to this Agreement are Minnesota municipalities located in close proximity to one another; and, WHEREAS, this Agreement is entered into for the purpose of allowing the employees of each City to come to the mutual aid and assistance of the employees of the other cities at those times when any member City's municipal water or sanitary sewer system needs emergency repair or maintenance work of any kind; and, WHEREAS, the parties hereto enter into this Agreement to set up in advance a reasonable method of recompensating each other for the costs of any aid which is given and to address the issue of liability for work that may be done improperly. NOW. THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual promises and conditions contained herein, it is agreed by the parties hereto as follows: J. Mutual Aid. Each of the parties to this Agreement agrees to make available to the other parties members of their Public Works Departments to aid the other cities in times of an emergency or otherwise with the maintenance, repair and operations of their respective municipal water and sanitary sewer services. 2. Reimbursement of Costs. Should the employees of a Public Works Department be called upon to assist another City, the City supplying the workers will then send a bill to the CitY" which received the assistance. Said bill will include all costs and expenses incurred by the City which sent an employee to help another City. 3. Pavment of Bill. The City who received help from another City will promptly pay, within thirty (30) days, any bills or invoices received from another City for services rendered under this Agreement. 4. Liability. The receiving City agrees to indemnify, save and hold harmless the sending City, its officers, agents and employees against any and all costs, damages and claims whatsoever for damage or injury to any person or property arising from any negligent act of the sending City's employee during the performance of this Agreement. Nonetheless, any and all employees remain employed by the City by whom they were hired and shall not be considered employees of any other City. Any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workers Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees shall remain the obligation of the City which regularly employs that employee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have causeu this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. CITY OF CENTERVILLE By By , Mayor , Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF W ASHlNGTON ) On tlus _ day of , 2000, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared and , of the City of Centerville, a Minnesota mUlucipality within the State of Minnesota, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the City of Centerville by the authority of the City Council of the City of Centerville, and and acknowledge said instmment to be the free act and deed of said City of Centerville. Notary Public CITY OF HUGO By Walter L. Stoltzman, Mayor By Mary Ann Creager, Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this _ day of . 2000. before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared W AL TER L. STOLTZMAN and MAR Y ANN CREAGER, of the City of Hugo, a Minnesota municipality within the State of Minnesota. and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the City of Hugo by the authority of the City Council of the City of Hugo, and WAL TER L. STOL TZMAN and MARYANN CREAGER acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said City of Hugo. Notary Public CITY OF LINO LAKES By By , Mayor , Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On tllis __ day of , 2000. before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared and , of the City of Lino Lakes, a Minnesota municipality witllin the State of Minnesota, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the City of Lino Lakes by the authority of the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, and and acknowledge said instrw11ent to be the free act and deed of said City of Centerville. Notary Public ~CI\ JIf '1\ Iii" r" .l. ''(/ lJr::::~{lll ,,-' DATE l\l[crrch 22, 2000 TO Honorable Mayor and Council FROIVI: JLl1l March RE Mutual Aid Agreement ~B~mDa~.m~cec.a.m~E.D~McmnmmG~mmmm~aSBaa.&~aR~~~EQ~CE~aC~UG~~emcmc~~ce~~U~D~ Enclosed in your packet is a copy of a mutual aid agreement that is being proposed by the CityafBugo. This item was tabled at the last Council meeting. I spoke to Lino Lakes City Administrator Li.rtda ~Waite Smith in regards to this issue. Enclosed in your packet is a letter that Lino Lakes sent to the City of Hugo in an attempt to clarify some Gfthe issues that they had with the agreement. At this point, I would recommend that Centerville draft a letter to Hugo and Lino Lakes to clarifY our position. I personally would like to see this f01'"1i1al agreement remain between the Cirj oiLino Lakes and HugO'. Vve could state in our letter that I,Ne would be open to assisth'1g other C0111ffiunities in the event of a natural disaster, but I do not want to have our staff coordinating who is responsible for having the on-call pager for the City of Hugo vvhen Hugo fmas themselves short staffed. -We cal1 discuss this issue in more detail at the meeting, Paul Palzer will be in attendance at the meeti..'1g. March 2, 2000 R r Mr. Robert Museu$ City Administrator City of HugD 5524 upper !46th Street Nonh Hugo.~ 5503~9367 Dear Bob: I received the proposed Mutual A..id Agreement be~ween Lino Lakes and Hugo for the provision of emergency public works assistance. Our Public Services Director Rick DeGardner reviewed it with hi~ !Otaff and they suggested several clarifications. AJthough these items don't nece:::sarily need to appear in the agreement, we want to make sure they are acknowledged. 1. It is our understanding that the a.greement cover only water and sewer related services. 2. It is our understanding that Mr. Petree will give our staff reasonable advance notice when he plans to take vacation. 3. Because Hugo's dispatching is done through Washington County, it is our expectation that Mr. Petree would turn over his pager to our staff for use during hi!\ absence. 4. Because the agreement would only cover water and sewer services, it is our expectation that for each coverage period Mr. Petree would provide our staff with the name of someone who could be contacted for ocher public works calls. 5. In order for our staff to provide timely response. it is our expectation that Mr. Petree would provide for each coverage period an updated map of main and valve locations. ~ 6. Our public works employees are members of a bargaining unit. In the e.~ent they are called to ass.ist Hugo during non-business hours, the charge to Hugo will reflect overtime and callback provisions of the union contract. If our interpretation and e;lpectations are in line with yours, 1 will put this on the City Council agenda for consideration on March 13. Please give me a call at 651.982-240 to verify we are in agreement. Sincerely. Linda Waite Smith City Administrator Lift Station #2 -Approval of Plans and Speci.fications Mr. Peterson indicated there were five bidders and the lowest bidder came in at $84,858. IvIr. Peterson recommends rejecting all bids received and conduct a re- bid after the amounts and options have been clearly identified. Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. sewnded bv Council Member Nelson to reie~t an bids recenved for the project. AU in favor. Motion carried unanimously. IX. NEW BUSINESS Peltier Lake Drive "No ParlUng" Mayor vViIbarber indicated the City has received numerous letters about the parking issue. ]'vir. March stated a complaint was addressed at the previous Council meeting. A letter from the City was sent asking for the residents who live along Peltier Lake Drive to offer comment on what their feelings were about the current parking situation. Several ideas were exchanged, including the installation of "No Parking" signs along the entire road or to install "No Parking" on the section of the road near the pond. Currently the road has posted "No Parking" signs on the North side of the road. Elizabeth Wagner of 1525 Peltier Lake Drive agrees with the current "No Parking" signs on the road and feels traffic goes through the area at a higher speed than posted. If speed limits were obeyed, the potential for accidents would be lessened. Mayor WiIharber stated he would be contacting Police Chief Joel Heckman to inform him of the issue and request the police to keep a closer watch on the traffic in that area. Motion bv Cou.HH::ii Member Nelson, seconded bv Council Member Swe~ney to diminate furt11lcr actioi!ll regarding parkiHlg restrictions on Peltier Lake Drive. An iilll favor, Motion (~arTierl !I.Hlanimouslv, Mutual Aid Agreement - Hugo Mr. March gave an overview of the agreement and indicated there were a lot of questions and issues that would need to be added before any action could be taken. MoHon bv em,mdt Member ErmJssard Vickers. seconded bv COUil]cjj l\-lember Sweeney to table the Ml.ltaH Aid Agreement. All in (avoil". MotioilJl c3l'Tied unanimously. Bowen Lot Split The lot split request property is the wetland that exists at the end of Clearwater Creek where the water discharges into Peltier Lake. Tl1Iee property owners 3 .=-=-- Not Approved CITY OF CENTERVlLJLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING lVIarcn 8, 2000 6:00 p.m. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on March 8, 2000, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Mayor Tom Wilharber Council Member Dick Travis Council Member Terry Sweeney Council Member Linda Broussard Vickers Council Member Mari Nelson ABSENT: None 81' AFF: City Administrator, Jim March City Attorney, James Hoeft City Engineer, Tom Peterson 1. CALL TO ORDER e Mayor Wilharber called the March 8, 2000 City Council meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. H. PUBLiC HEARING (S) HI. APPEARANCES/AWARDS IV. CONSIDERA TlOM OF MiNUTES Februarv 23.2000 CouncillVIeetin!Z Minutes Motion by Council Member J'LelSOifl. seconded bv Council Member Sw,e~ney to. approve the February 23. 2000 Council meetin2 minutes with noted additions. Motiol1can-ied IHlI:lnimol.lslv. V. FA YMENT OF CLAIMS The Citv of Center vi lIe Fc::bruary 24 throUQh March 8.2000 IVloHoiDl bvCmmdi IVI.ember Sw~-e:rn,ev, ~H~:coililded by Council iVJember Tr.Jvis to apprny,e the cJ:penditure5 for the ON {!rom Jaillil.l:lir'( 27, 2000 thTOug~ February 9, 2000. All in favor. Motion carrned unanimously. Centennial Fire District Expenses Centennial Fire District 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 784-7472 - Office (651) 784-2427 - Fax Noven1ber 20, 2001 TO: City Council City of Centerville City Council City of Circle Pines City Council City of Lino Lakes FROM: lViilo Bennett SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures and approval for paYlnent of expenses. Your approval of expenses, as listed on the attached copy of the check register, checks # 12936 - 12952, in the amount of $12,417.64 is hereby requested. Centennial Fire District Check Register Page 1 of 1 DATE CHECK# NAME ACCOUNT AMOUNT 11/20/2001 12936 Allina Health System 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 4,200.00 11/20/2001 12937 Amoco Oil Company 42100 - Fuel and Lube 195.65 11/20/2001 12938 AJ\ICOM Communications, Inc. 42130 - Equipment Expense 1,311.00 11/20/2001 12939 Anoka Technical College 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 60.00 11/20/2001 12940 Best Buy 42130 - Equipment Expense 848.73 11/20/2001 12941 Fire Instructors Assn. of Minnesota 40100 - Logistical Expense 435.89 11/20/2001 12942 Malloy, Montague, Karnowki, & Radosevich 42160 - Accounting Services 232.00 11/20/2001 12943 Metro Fire 42130 - Equipment Expense 2,444.20 11/20/2001 12944 Postmaster 42180 - Office Supplies 102.00 11/20/2001 12945 Qwest 42240 - Telephone Expense 297.85 11/20/2001 12946 Randy T. Rolstad 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 89.81 11/20/2001 12947 Reliant Energy Minnegasco 42253 - Station 2 - Gas 198.68 11/20/2001 12948 Rivard Tailoring 42120 - Uniform Expense 103.31 11/20/2001 12949 Rolltex Computers 42130 - Equipment Expense 1,206.10 11/20/2001 12950 Ross Industries, Inc. 42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies 276.22 1 "1120/2001 12951 Stacy's Specialty Stitching 42280 - Miscellaneous Expense 42.00 11/20/2001 12952 Xcel Energy 42254 - Station 2 - Electric 374.20 Total $12,417.64 Centennial Fire District 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 784-7472 - Office (651) 784-2427 - Fax November 20, 2001 TO: City Council City of Centerville City Council City of Circle Pines City Council City of Lino Lakes FROM: Milo Bennett SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures and approval for payment of expenses. Your approval of expenses, as listed on the attached copy of the check register, checks #12936 - 12952, in the amount of $12,417.64 is hereby requested. Centennial Fire District Check Register Page 1 of 1 DATE CHECK# NAME ACCOUNT AMOUNT 11/20/2001 12936 Allina Health System 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 4,200.00 11/20/2001 12937 Amoco Oil Company 42100 - Fuel and Lube 195.65 11/20/2001 12938 ANCOM Communications, Inc. 42130 - Equipment Expense 1,311.00 11/20/2001 12939 Anoka Technical College 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 60.00 11/20/2001 12940 Best Buy 42130 - Equipment Expense 848.73 11/20/2001 12941 Fire Instructors Assn. of Minnesota 40100 - Logistical Expense 435.89 11/20/2001 12942 Malloy, Montague, Karnowki, & Radosevich 42160 - Accounting Services 232.00 11/20/2001 12943 Metro Fire 42130 - Equipment Expense 2,444.20 11/20/2001 12944 Postmaster 42180 - Office Supplies 102.00 11/20/2001 12945 Qwest 42240 - Telephone Expense 297.85 11/20/2001 12946 Randy T. Rolstad 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 89.81 11/20/2001 12947 Reliant Energy Minnegasco 42253 - Station 2 - Gas 198.68 11/20/2001 12948 Rivard Tailoring 42120 - Uniform Expense 103.31 11/20/2001 12949 Rolltex Computers 42130 - Equipment Expense 1,206.10 11/20/2001 12950 Ross Industries, Inc. 42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies 276.22 11/20/2001 12951 Stacy's Specialty Stitching 42280 - Miscellaneous Expense 42.00 11/20/2001 12952 Xcel Energy 42254 - Station 2 - Electric lli2.Q Total $12,417.64 f ~ t- \ (\IJ~ ~'\'l je J{. ~) l BALANCE IN CHECKING ACCOUNTS AS OF NOVEMBER 15, 2001 $2,113,322.00 RECEIPTS $116,206.25 $ 116,206.25 DISBURSEMENTS ($107,058.99) ($ 107,058.99) PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 11-21-01 ($8,139.59) BALANCE IN CHECKING ACCOUNT AS OF SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 $2,114,329.67 - )> ~ 'iF> co co (J1 co co N o 'iF> CO 'iF> 'iF> 'iF> o 'iF> ffiffiN 'iF> ~N W~~~~~~~~~ffi~ffiffiffiffi ~~ffiffi~ffi CO~(J1 OOI\.l~ONI\.lI\.lCONNN'iF>CONmCON~ W(J1mNOOO~0(J1(J1~0(J1(J10W(J1~W~OCO OOO~~(J10~~(J10(J1~~(J10COOCON(J1~~ OOOOOOOOOOoocoooomocoooo~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ N~NNNN~N~-~~~ ~ ~~~-~~~ OOoooooom mm ~~~~~~W ~~~S~OO~O ~O ~~~OOO~ 00 NN 00 00 ~ N CIJ, -10 )> C nio :!!;;o ;;oQo mO ~(j) o!:: o m z CIJ m CIJ )> (j) m ;;0 cii , o 000 ~om ~mCO ~ z-..J ID -I ID ;;o~m };:::;)> z, < , m Om ;;0 ;;0,,-0 <':,0 moz ;;0 0 0~:2: N I :t::- O 0 -< o~, , ~ :s: COo co~ 6 ~ CO m m 25 23 ~ 0000000000 ~865~:iri~~~~ (J1I\.l;;oco(J1~ooom o!::~ IlDmOO;j<.: mOroc;;o;;om;>::z-< mc~z};:::;z 00 ;;oOCIJniZ,ni~ClJO 8~~~~r;;;;oo~~ ~o -I-<Ai~-o~-I -I ~ ~ ~ g g 8 6 :, g :s:Xi,,~:s:~zO) o m:s:wx~m 6~-Io~,w~ ~ClJS;: m, m 6 '- )> (j) ex; Oc z c 0 -< ;;0 ID CIJ S;)> -0,' N )>)> N 0 Z }> iri m m m 000 ~ ~ ~ , ~CIJ w -0 (J1 m o };: , )> CIJ CIJ m CIJ 00 ~c 13 ID 0;;0 ID ro ~ 2 )> -6. z - o~ o () c ;;oCIJ -I )> , m CIJ -I )> >< 000000 Nom C gO~~~1D 1\.l-l~(J1N;;O !::~o:s::s:~ o m ~ ~ r;J ~. C;;o-lZO"S. O:!!mCIJoCIJ ~z;;o-l:2:~ Om~OO ~)>Aio5:i13 ClJZm~ 0 mo-lid~m -IS;~ 6~ ~87 ::J?j CCO )> z z ~ ::! z -I 0 -< z ~ '- )> ;;0 m~~~~ ~~6~b ;;0;;0;;0;;0;;0;;0;;0;;0;;0;;0;;0;;0;;0;;0;;0;;0;;0;;0;;0;;0;;0;;0;;0 ~ ~ :: w w W m N N N N (J1 0 ~ 000 ::!1;;o1D ro ~ ~ o ~ :J ~ r (Q ;;0 .E. ~ ~. 6 ~ 3 ;:. ::r 0- nO c ro en ::::l ro en 3 ro ro en .3. -0-0 ro ro 3 3 ~ ~. ->. ~ooosso W N N ->. o ID <::::. n: 5" to ~ ro (J ::r WWWW NNNm N N N o co 0000 IDID;;oCIJ c c CD Q) O:O:@-~ ~c.6? ~ ~.E. ro ro c (J (J 0 ::r ::r ~ W N N ~ o ID <::::. n: 5. to ~ ro (J ::r -0-0 ro ro 3 3 ~~ 00 000 ->. o ID <::::. n: ::::l to ~ ro (J ::r )> g. -I '< "C <II ::lJ )> ~ 'iF> ~ ~ N m 'iF> ffi ffi wo~ OON oww ->. ~ ~ ->. ->. ~ N~~ ~~25 ->. ->. ~ 000 CCC IDIDID CCC ;;0 ;;0 ;;0 ;;0;;0;;0 ro ro ro (J (J (J ro ~. ro ~"E-g (j)(j)(j) a a a c c c ""CJ ""CJ ""CJ 000 ~ ~ ;;0;;0;;0 m m m CIJCIJCIJ 666 m m m z z z -I -I -I };:};:};: " , ->. ~ ~ ->. ~ , , ~ ~ co (J1 w bbb ~ ~ (j)(j)(j) ~ o ~ , ~ ~ (J1 (J1 (J1 000 000 )>)>)> (J (J (J (J (J (J 000 c c C ::::l ::J ::::l en en en ;;0 ;;0 ;;0 ro ro ro (J (J (J ro ro ro <. <' <" OJ OJ OJ CY CY CY iDiDiD 00 ->. ~ ~ ~ "T1 C Z )>0 ~ c; -I ~ '< G) -g m G)~ ::lJ )> r "T1 c z o )> C'l C'l o c: ;a o <II rJl !:; )> 3 o c: ;a f ~ t~ : ~ 0-1 III ..... _Ill 11l ::J ::lJ ~ 11l ..... () o 3 3 11l ::J Cii Ztll III Ill" 30- 11l ::r n OJ t.n ::J'" ;;0 CD o CD "C ~ t.n (") -f -< o ." (") m z -f m ;;0 < r r m ~ ~ N ~ 2; -0 OJ lO ro (J1 -0 :s: ffi N ffi -J ffi ffiffiffiffi()10ffiW COOlOOCO-JN.j>. ~O.j>.NN~-J'-..J 0) Nc.oWO)NCD....lr. '"T1 C z :I> 0 a ~ -I ..... ::c5 :E <D :I> ffi;oiri N ;0 co '"T1 N C o z o 0 ..... ..... ..... ..... .j>. .j>. 00 ..... ......It. .......It. .......It. ---It. --II. ....lr. .......It. ....lr. ....lr. ....lr. ....lr. ....lr. ....lr. ....lr. -... - - - ....lr. ....lr. ....lr. ....lr. ....lr. .......It. .j>..j>..j>.WWWW ~~~~~s~ 000000000 ccccccccc [lJ[lJ[lJ[lJ[lJ[lJ[lJ[lJ[lJ ;U;U;U;U;U;U;U;U;U m m m m m m m m m o n n n n n n n n m m m m m m m m m ~~~~~~~-g:~ UlUlUlUlUlUlUlUlUl m m m m m m m m ro < < < < < < < < < W-o-o o ro m :2: :J ~ :I> ()1 0 rri:2:2 ;U:l>:I> ~~--1 mmm Ul;U;U ~O--l -"om m :s: Ul m:s:~ m m W ..... ..... -0 o ()1 < m :2:2}';:J :1>:1> ~ W ~ ~ m 0 ~~;U~ ~O ~ mom Ul:s: ;U ~:s: rri m Ul m ~ -" m m W-o o (0 :2 :J ~:2 m:l> ;U ~ ~m m;U Ul ~ -" m m ....lr. ---It. ....lr. ....L ....L ....lr. ..... ---.10 .......It. ....l.,.......lt. t ~~~gs~~ ....lr.....lr. 6 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... , , W W W ~~S ;U;U;U;U 0l0l0l0l 0000 ..... wwww .j>.-J.j>..j>. .j>. .j>..j>. 0000 0000 Ul:2UlUl OJ Q) Q) Q) cD'ffictcD' OUl~~ =' m ::1" :J ~roA~ :::::l (J) S' ::J co coco ;U;U;U;U;U 0l0l0l0l0l ~OO~~ wwwww -J-J.j>..j>.-J ....lr........Ir...j:::...t:.......lr. 00000 00000 :2:2UlUl:2 OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ ~m(f)ro~ UlUl~~Ul Q) OJ :so 5" OJ roro~~ro en (j) :::J ::J en CO CO :2:2 OJ OJ ~ ~ -"-,, ro (0 ro (0 :2 OJ ~ -" ro (0 :2:2 OJ OJ ~ ro -" -" (0 ro (0 ro -" C Z o .j>. W ffi ..... .j>. w CO W ()1 o :I> Q. ffi .j>. w CO W c.n o '"T1 C z :I> 0 ~t;; -I en '< J: ffi~C .....;o~ .j>. m ~ ;0 '" rfi ()1 () o ;0 o Ul en Z G) ..... --- ..... .j>. (3 o r- o ~ CD r- ^ N I C Z ~ m :;0 Ul o :;0 o Ul Ul Z o ..... Q) o CO I C ..... ..... , ..... .j>. 6 ..... ;U .j>. W Q) W Q) ..... o o Ul "0 ro () ~ :I> en en (0 en en '3 ro :J Ui -" c Z o .j>. ..... ffi N o o N -J :I> Q. ffi N o o N -J "" f:A ffi f:A ....... f:A {;f?....lr..N-f:Af:AN....... ....lr.C.Dc.nNN~~O -JWCoOlNNTVO Q) -JO.j>.OlOW ....lr. .....lo. ....lr.. .....l. ....lr. ....lr.. ....... ....lr. ....lr. --" ....lr. .....lo. ....lr. ....lr.. ....... ....lr. Ni\3:::;::::;~-"""- 000l0l.j>. S~~~S .j>. w W 25 <:3 23 ..... ..... 00000000 cccccccc [lJ[lJ[lJ[lJ[lJ[lJ[lJ[lJ ;U;U:;O;U:;O;UJ);U m (0 ro CD CD (0 CD CD (') () () 0 () n C') C) (0 ro (0 ro ro m CD ro ~'-g:-E'~~-g:~~ UlUlUlUlUlUlCfJUl m ro m ro m m CD m < < < < < < < < "'U.....l......lo."'U"U .......""'0 mOOromOOro :J 00:J:J oo:J :;O;U .....:;O;u O~~OO~~O 35zz~P5zz35 ~~~~~~~~ ZmmZZmmZ -" -" -" -" m m m m m m m m ....L....L....L....lr......lr.....lr.-...lt........lt. ....lr. ....lr. ---II. ....lr. ....lr. ....... ....L t I I I c.c~U1U1252:5ww 6660--1.--"06 ....lr. ....lr. --..1, ....lr. ;U;U:;O;U:;O;UJ);U ~::~~~~~:: (J1CJ1(1lc.n(J1c.nc.nc.n wwwwwwww NNNNNNTVN wwwwwwww ()1()1()1()1()1()1(Jl()1 00000000 UlUlUlUlUlUlCfJS':! QQQQQQoo '3 '3 '3 '3 '3 '3 3 3 :2:2:2:2:2:2:2::2 m OJ Q) m Q) Q) Q} Q) ~~~~~~~~ 00000000 ill ill ID ~. ID ~. ru ~. :r :5" 5' ~ S' :J S" ::J OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ m OJ coco co coco co <.Q co ro m ro ro m m CD ro -"-,,-,,-,,-,,-,,-,,-,, c c c: c c c c c '"T1 C z :I> 0 ~ :: -I 01 '< en "tl -I <II 0 ;C ;C s: :E :I> -I m ;0 s: "'ll "'ll ;0 o c... m () -I en -" C Z o o ffi CO CO '" o W ~ Ol Z[lJ Ql Ql 3 Ci <II ::T :I> C'l C'l o c ~ o m '" C'l ... :I> 3 o c ~ 0-1 OJ ... -Ql <II :J ;0 <D ~ () o 3 3 <D :J Ui 'f ~ ~ (") Q) (JJ ::T :;0 CD o CD "0 ..... (JJ C") ~ -< o "T1 C") m z ~ m ;;0 < r r m ..... ..... N ..... (3 ..... -0 ..... ~ ()1 ro -0 N s: "T1 TI "T1 TI C C C C Z Z Z Z 0 0 }> }> 0 0 }> c:n en ~ !l c:n OJ ~ '~i I\.l 0 0 0 0 -i I\.l '< ~ m "C en ~ C") Cll m "- 0 ffi ffi iF> ;0 ::iE ffi ffi Z -I>. -I>. iF> 6'7 6'7 6'7 _N iF> m -I>. -I>. 6'7 6'7 6'7 }> 0 m m 6'7 W 6'7 ffi (11 ~ ffi iF> N -I>. ~ 6'7 ;0 Co co ffi OJ ffi OJ W fd'> 3 ~ w W <0 co W (11 co 6'7 -I>. -I>. -I>. W OJ ~ "T1 co co fd'> OJ ffi N OJ ffi 6'7 ~ -I>. -I>. C'5 :'l """' """' -I>. <0 co ~ -I>. OJ ~ ~ w '" N """' C ~ ~ w >=' -I>. ...... W 0 <0 (11 co 0 <0 to ~ (;, to ~ to (11 m <0 tv m co Z 6 6 i:Xl i:Xl ~ tv to w w to ~ (11 c:: 0 -I>. -I>. w (11 -I>. co (11 """' co (11 <0 -I>. N co OJ 0 co co """' OJ W (11 '" """' """' N W N ;a m :c:: "T1 c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ...... ...... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ...... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ...... ~ ...... ~ ~ ...... ~ ...... ...... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 N N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -- ...... -- ~ -- N N N N -- ...... ~ -- -- ~ ...... ...... ~ 0 0 0 OJ OJ -I>. -I>. -I>. -I>. W ~ W W 0 0 0 0 ~ OJ OJ en -I>. -I>. O-i 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 0> .... 0 0 -0> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ...... ...... ...... ~ ~ ...... ~ ~ ~ ~ Cll =' ;0 Cll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD' .... c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c C") CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD 0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 3 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD 3 () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () Cll CD CD CD <!l. <!l. CD CD CD <1l CD CD CD CD CD <!l. CD CD CD <!l. CD CD <!l. CD =' "E "E ~ "B. "B. "E -g: ~ "E ~ ~ "E "E -g: "B. ~ -g: -g: "B. -g: "E "B. "E c;r (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) CD CD CD CD CD CD CD <1l CD CD CD CD CD CD CD <1l CD CD CD CD CD CD CD <' <' <' <' <' <' <' <' <' <' <' <' <' <' <' <' <' <' <' <' <' <' <' Q) "U "U OJ "U OJ "U "U OJ "U w "U "U "U w "U "U co (j) CD CD (j) CD (j) co CD CD (j) co CD 0 <1l CD :2: CD 0 CD :2: :2: <1l (j) m ::J ::J m ::J m (j) ::J ::J m (j) ::J :2: ::J ::J ::J :2: ::J ::J m :2: OJ OJ :2: :2: m Q) OJ :2: m w }> w }> }> :2: (j) (j) co :2: (j) (j) :2: co }> :2: 0 -i ~ }> 0 -i -i :2: m m m m -i m -i m m m ;:0 m m ;:0 (j) ;:0 m m m ;:0 m (j) m }> ~ ;:0 m :2: ;:0 ;:0 }> ;:0 :2: :2: m ;:0 :2: :2: ;:0 m ;:0 ;:0 }> :2: :2: -i -i -i 0 m m 0 m m 0 -i m -i m -i -i m ("") 0 ;:0 ;:0 m 0 ;:0 ;:0 0 m m ;:0 m ;:0 m m ;:0 $: ;:0 $: $: ;:0 (j) ;:0 (j) ;:0 (") -i $: 0 $: $: 0 -i -i -i -i -< 0 0 TI m "T1 m Q) $: $: m (j) m (j) 0 $: $: m -i m -i en " "T1 ::T "'TI m m m m ("") :;;0 m ~ ...... ~ ~ ...... ~ ~ ~ ...... ~ ...... ~ ...... ~ ...... ~ ~ ~ ...... ~ ~ ~ ~ ZIXl. CD Z ~ ...... ...... ~ ~ ...... ~ ~ ~ ...... ...... ~ ...... ~ ...... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0> 0> 0 -i , , ~ ...... ~ ~ , , , , , , , , , ~ ~ ~ ...... ~ ~ w w w w ~ ...... ~ ~ ...... ...... ~ ~ w w 30' CD m <0 '" <0 (11 (11 0 0 0 ~ w w w W <0 <0 <0 <0 (11 (11 (11 (11 0 .~ tl> ::T ;;:0 6 6 6 6 6 ~ ...... 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 ~ _. ~ ...... ~ ~ ...... ...... ...... ~ ~ ~ ->. ->. ->. "C :5 .... en r- r- ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 ;:0 :t> m OJ Q) Q) OJ OJ OJ Q) OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ~ N N N '>' N N N N N N N ->. ->. ->. ->. ->. ~ 0 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w c:: w w ;a """' ...... """' """' """' """' """' """' """' """' """' """' """' -I>. """' -I>. """' :j -I>. -I>. """' """' """' N N N N N N N N N N N N N -I>. -I>. ->. -I>. -I>. ->. ->. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tl> III (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) :2: (j) :2: :2: (j) (j) :2: :2: :2: 0 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD <1l CD CD CD OJ OJ OJ OJ .... :;: :;: :;: :;: :;: :;: :;: :;: :;: :;: :E :;: :;: CD OJ CD OJ OJ CD CD OJ OJ OJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD ~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f? SJ ~ ~ (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) Ul Ul OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ Q!.. OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ ::J OJ S. OJ OJ ::J ::J OJ OJ Q!.. ro ro ro ro ro ro ro (1) ro ro ro ro CD ~ ro ^ ro ro ~ ^ ro ro CD (j) rn rn (j) (j) (j) rn (j) (j) rn rn (j) (j) ::J VI S. VI VI ::J S. (j) (j) VI <D <D <D <D :2: :2: :2: :2: OJ OJ OJ OJ ~ ~ ~ ~ "T1 TI "T1 "T1 <1l CD CD CD <1l CD CD <1l ~ N ~ 25 ~ "U ~ (11 CD "U w S -n "'T1 -n C c: c z Z z 0 ):> )> C 0 ):> )> <Xl Q. ~ 0> m Q. ~ '~i 0 0 J\) -l ..... -l '< m '< ~ "C "C Y> III Ul III ~ ..... ("') ..... Y> Y> ;0 ;0 ;0 m J\) J\) Y>Y>~ 0 Y> Y> Y> )> N ~ ~ <Xl <Xl <Xl :E ..... ..... ..... 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 ,:> ,:> 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 "'T1 0 0 0 c: c: a (]1 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 0 0 C ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... - - - ..... ..... ..... C-l m m Ol -J:>. 23 23 23 23 III ., _Ill ..... ..... III :j ;0 III 0 0 0 0 CD' ., m ):> ("') -..J <0 -..J 0 0 (]1 <0 m r 3 <0 ..... ..... 0 m 0 z 3 '- )> '- III G) OJ () :j OJ iii ~ r ~ ):> m 0 -< -l -< () ;0 , -l ;0 ~ ::0 Z m r m 0 , ~ < s: ;0 0 OJ m OJ c c m ::0 s: ::0 () (f) OJ (f) J\) (") m c m 0 0 ::0 () 0 -t (f) 0 (") () m ~ r -< -l () m Q) -< " '- (J) 0 -n -l 0 0 0 -< ::0 C ::T "T1 ;0 -n ;0 0 (f) z (") (f) ;0 0 )> AJ m 0 (f) 0 r ..... ..... ..... ..... Zll;l CD Z ..... ..... ..... ..... III III 0 -t , , , ..... ..... 30- CD m m m Ol -J:>. III :T ::0 6 6 6 6 -. ..... ..... ..... ..... "0 < ~ (J) r r ;0 ;0 ::0 ;0 )> m co <Xl co m .., .., 0 0 0 J\) 0 ..... 0 w w w w c: Ol m Q) m a J\) J\) J\) J\) C w w w 0 (]1 (]1 (]1 0 III en m m m s: .., (fJ (fJ Ul (ji' ., () () () 0 0 (3 () ~ ::;: ::;: ::;: OJ 0 0 0 ::J C1l C1l C1l C1l U U U 0 0 0 0 c '<? Ul '<? (fJ ill ~ ill ;0 C1l < C1l ::J C C1l (fJ ..... N 23 ..... -0 ..... OJ CJ1 to C1l -0 -J:>. s: CITY OF CENTERVILLE *Check Summary Register@) 11/21/01 9:40 AM Page 1 NOVEMBER 2001 Name Check Date Check Amt 10100 THE COUNTY BANK UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid UnPaid 16390 16391 16392 16393 16394 16395 16396 16397 16398 16399 16400 16401 ALL SAFE FIRE TEST, INC. BEARCOM CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT CITY OF ST. PAUL CULLIGAN GOLDENGATE INTERNET SERVICES GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY HOTSY EQUIPMENT OF MN ICC INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH INC KENNEDY & GRAVEN LEAGUE OF MN CITIES MINN. DEPT. OF HEALTH MINNEGASCO* PALZER,PAUL QWEST RIVARD ELECTRIC COMPANY INC SHEA SWEENEY, KRIS XCELENERGY $294.70 $488.68 $80,393.00 $52.91 $28.60 $55.00 $12.80 $275.83 $50.00 $21.00 $263.50 $60.00 $672.00 $437.66 $94.52 $60.58 $280.00 $64.80 $10.71 $1,072.55 $84,688.84 Total Checks MANUAL CHECKS QWEST SAM'S CLUB GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL METROPOLlTIAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT SERV CHOICEPOINT SERVICES, INC. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES INS. THERESA BRENNER TEDD PETERSON PERA MN DEPT OF REVENUE NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS IRS/COUNTY BANK $52.00 $15.00 $27.90 $13,200.27 $16.00 $3,059.48 $187.44 $148.93 $1,166.72 $502.21 $515.69 $3,478.51 TOTAL MANUAL CHECKS $22,370.15 TOTAL CHECKS $107,058.99 11 -j )> UJ s.: -n ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0- 0 (D (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 r 5i < (") 0- 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --1 (l) ~ n- (]) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 ::J ~ CJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- m 0 (") UJ (l) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '< ;:0 (]) (D iil 0 0 CJ 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0- (D -j I~ co Gl --J <D <D <D N .p.. (D 0 (") (l) 0 <D 01 ~ .p.. W Gl --J <1l ~ (J) m ~ z 0 UJ [JJ "1J s.: :s:: UJ "1J 0 c: m :2i m m 0 0 -j )> 0 3 GJ Z -j m r 0 m "1J 0 a- .2 m 0 m I "1J N A <1l II Z m ;0 m ;0 I m ..., m ;0 N m .?J UJ ;0 rn )> A l20 0 --< 0 UJ _z "1J m z 0 -j _z 0 -< )> z m A A Z (l) A Z c :3 ;0 ;0 -j m s.: r m GJ fE> fE> fE> m m '--- _UJ -j <1l W UJ UJ 0 0 '--- I ::J --.,.. u-. ffi u-. -j )> 0 2S 0- w m m --J z .p.. Gl --J r :s:: '0 co 01 Z 0 ~ ~ m [JJ GJ U1 ::J '< ~ (D N N --J (Q EFl , 0 ffi ffi EFl EFl EFl ffi ffi C N ~ ~ N ffi N ~ D .p.. 0 u-. --.,.. --.,.. W --J --.,.. --.,.. ::2:~ II Gl .p.. 0 <D --J --J .p.. 0 w 0 ----.; co Gl co W N 01 (l) 0 0 co 6 --J 0 co --J Gl ~ <C (J) --->. Gl --J Gl 01 0 U1 U1 W U1 <1l (J) GJ ::J 0- EFl ~ EFl ffi EFl EFl EFl ffi '0 ~ ffi ~ N EFl N -j GJ -Gl <D --.,.. W --.,.. N --J ~ W G)~ '< .p.. <D W .p.. 0 Gl ~ .p.. W 01 ~ 01 --J 01 U1 W Gl co 0 (l) D w ~ ~ 01 co 0:> --J <D U1 <Jl a- m --J w --J Gl <D en 01 N 0 <Jl <1l :::!- 0 3 EFl II ~ N u-. ffi ER EFl EFl EFl EFl EFl ." -J::>. ~ N ~ ~ .p.. ffi N ~ <1l --J ~ W .p.. --J Gl W en .p.. 0- ~ ~ <D co W .p.. Gl Gl -jtO m (n en m 0 w ~ en (l) ..., u () --J 0 W <D --J W CD W W x ~ ~ ----l ''"< -< EFl EFl ~ 0 U1 ER EFl EFl EFl EFl EFl EFl --J .p.. co en Gl .p.. 0:> ~I UJ " '-0 0 ----.; w .p.. --J CD W Gl ----.; U1 -j- (l) (l) ." --J W co 0 0 ~ U1 co U1 (l) ~ '< '< - N ----.; 0) <D --J 0 0:> .p.. X <1l " - () G) <1l 0 fA m ..., 0" c: C :z Co -0 -i '" '" 3 ,- N 0 m '-10 ... ~ 3 ;0 (l) (") x ~ < !l) r -< r UJ m EFl EFl ER <1l --J ER ER EFl EFl EFl EFl (") (Jl --J 0) <D CD CD .p.. .p.. U1 co c: 0 N .p.. W N ~ --J .p.. --J ..., (") --J G~ ~ <D (n ~ N ~ ;:;: pj" w .p.. N CD U1 .p.. W '< - :s: EFl <1l (fj EFl EFl (fj ER EFl EFl EFl c- eo N N N W W N C:;" 0 01 ~ ~ .p.. 0 en 0 en ~ ~ ~ (l) --J 0 --J W W ro <D 01 W 0 CD 01 N 0:> fF! fA S0 01 ER (fj EFl ffi ~ fF! ;0 01 .p.. ----.; --J --J ~ Gl co <D ~ 0 W Gl Gl ~. ~ U1 ~ 0 0 --J ..., 0 .p.. <D <D ~ 0 N en <1l Ul EFl EFl ~ N EFl <1l 01 co --J ro-i CD 0 CD ..., (l) Gl 0 0) ~>< <D 0 <D < fE> 0 .p.. (fj fF! fF! fF! EFl c: 0 co co Gl --J 0:> ::J N --J <D ~I --J 5i <D N 0 ~ --J -< --J N 0) --J Gl Gl N 0 fF! 25 EFl (F) _0:> fF! EA EFl EA CA m EFl ,-,,- N Gl <D CD <D ~ Gl CD ~ -j w 0) CJ Gl --J --J 0 N N JJ CD <D 0) 0 co Gl Gl 0 0 " to co en ----.; Go 01 ~ .p.. <D co (l) (]) "1J <D N W Gl OJ .p.. co CD CD '< s.: - . -- . . CITY OF CENTERVILLE FETE DES LAC FESTIVAL COMMITTEE MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 2001 6:30 p.m. PRESENT: Chair Karla De Vine Committee Member John Thill Committee Member Terry Sweeney Committee Member Lisa Kieselhorst eld Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville Fete des Lacs Co their regularly scheduled meeting on November 19,2001, at City Hall, 1880 Ma. V. o STAFF: None. ABSENT: Committee Member DeVine OTHERS: None. I. e Lac Committee meeting to order reed three (3) letter of resignation this II. HI. no minutes we e available for consideration. IV. ief discussion was held regarding the committee disbanding. Motion made bv Committee Member Sweeney. seconded bv Committee IVlember Thill to disband the Committee. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. VI. OLD BUSINESS None. VIIo ADJOURNMENT November 19, 2001 Fete des Lacs Festival Committee Meeting Minutes Motion made by Chair DeVine. seconded by Committee Member Sweeney to adjourn tbe Fete des Lacs Committee meeting of November 19. 2001 at 6:47 porno All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed By: Teresa Bender, Clerk/Treasurer Memorandum From the desk a/Ray DeVine... To: Festival Committee Members Date: November 19, 2001 Festival Committee Subject: From: Ray De Vine As my earlier memo stated, I have decided to resign from the Festival Committee. I understand that my earlier memo left some room for interpretation; it is my intention to resign from the festival committee. Although I am not pleased with the actions of the current city council members, I would encourage everyone to continue to plan a city celebration that the entire city can be proud of. I had approached the city council and requested a large amount of money to fund the city celebration. This would have relieved the committee from the fundraising that we have done in the past. I feel that the majority of the community would be supportive of funding a city celebration in the future. Unfortunately, this year, due to changes in the economy, changes in the state property tax system and changes in our city councils' priorities, you will not receive the funds I requested. Remember, we did only receive $5,000 last year from the city and we put on an excellent celebration for all the residents to enjoy. I hope to help with the festival as it gets closer, but at this time, I need to spend time with my family, my business and some of my other volunteer duties. I hope that everyone who is on the committee stays on the committee and works toward another great celebration for 2002. Please feel free to call me with any questions you may have from the previous 2 years. 11-19-01 City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 To Whom It May Concern: I, John N. Thill, do hereby resign from the Centerville Fete des Lacs Committee on this, the nineteenth day, of the eleventh month, of the year 2001. Respectfull y, , ;{ 7\ _/_~_\,t;~~~Jjl " \~ '(;~~,~.-'-. \/ \., , ~ John N. Thill Terry Sweeney - 7154 Brian Drive Centerville, MN 55038 l\1arch 15,2001 City of Centerville Fete des Lacs Committee Centerville, MN 550.38 Dear Council lVlembers: I'm writing this letter with a lot of difficulty. I have volunteered my time to the community since shortly after I moved here twelve and a half years ago. I am currently a member of the Fire Department, the Centerville Lions, and the Fete des Lacs Committee. In the summer i have coached Little League every year since my 14 year old son was in Tee-Ball. I now find myself needing more time for my family, and myself. I also am not happy with the current budfJet talks. It know how hard it is to figure out a budget for a city, I was a council member for two years. Cutting necessities, and even some e},,1:ras (such as the festival) are not the answer. A lot of work went into revitalizing the City Festival. Now, there's no money to continue. The current economic situation makes soliciting donations difficult at best, but the council doesn't seem to care. This festival was on the verge of becoming great. Citizens look forward to this get-together every year. The last two years, the parade alone has been spectacular, and the turnout fantastic. This year, though, the city won't have enough money to even pay for the band at the dance. I'm sorry, but I can no longer participate on the Festival Committee. I hope you see the light before it's too late. Sincerely, / 'J I ~______-~._... ".. Terry Sweeney c::::: Festival Committee ,,~/ iEsta5(islz err Week in Review November 16, 2001 and November 21,2001 HAPPY THANKSGIVING! I hope everyone has a great holiday weekend! League of Minnesota Cities 2001 Policy Adoption Conference. I attended the League of Minnesota Cities 2001 Policy Adoption Conference on November 16th. As expected there was a lot of discussion regarding the property tax compression and the loss ofLGA and HACA. Matt Smith, Commissioner of Revenue presented the State's rationale regarding these issues and that there was an expectation that cities would levy back what was cut by the State. He reiterated that the Governor and the legislature wanted to give local control of the levy to local governments. When questioned, he really had nothing more to add to his presentation. There was also a presentation from Pam Wheelock, Commissioner of Finance regarding the State's economic situation. She agreed that while the State and national economies were in a recession, there is a strong indication that both will rebound significantly in 2003. Attached are copies of information from the League of Minnesota Cities and the State Commissioners' presentation. Audit of City's Deferred Compensation. As you know, Kristie had indicated that she would be in once the additional files that she requested were pulled by Staff Teresa received a fax listing additional documents that Kristie needs and she is anticipating that Kristie will be at City Hall next week. Budget Planning Process. I thought the discussion went well last Thursday night. Staff will have a copy of their proposal in the Council packet for consideration of the 2002 levy. All of us, Council and StafI, have all worked many hours to put together a budget each of us feels will serve the residents of Centerville well. Thanks for your time, consideration and assistance! I have sincerely appreciated the efforts to help me come up to speed on the budget process. YMCA's Request for City Support. I met with Craig Bode, County Bank, Jeff Reinert, City ofLino Lakes, and Dave Marshall, YCMA Program Executive on Tuesday, Nov. 20 about their project to bring a YMCA center to the area. To date, they have raised a bit over $5 million to put towards the project costs of $6.5 million. The YMCA is in process of beginning their next fund raising campaign for the additional $1.5 and if possible, they are looking for a financial commitment from the City of Centerville. They would like to meet with the Council, present their plans, and discuss other ideas about how the City can assist the project if money is not readily available. I advised them that the City is finishing work on the 2002 budget and there probably won't be any additional funds available for new spending. They are still interested in meeting with Council at their convemence. Public Works Joint Powers Agreement. I've contacted the City Administrators for Lino Lakes and Hugo regarding their joint powers agreement for shared public works employees. Linda Waite-Smith, Lino Lakes, indicated that she will get the information to me and agreed to meet with Mike Erickson, City of Hugo and me next week. Lighting in Eagle Pass. I have sent a response to the Gassen Companies regarding their request for additional street lighting in Eagle Pass. The Public Works Director has contacted Excel (formerly NSP) with the questions that were raised at the Council meeting. He is also investigating whether or not increasing the wattage of the light bulbs would accomplish the increased lighting that the folks in Eagle Pass are looking for. I will be meeting with Mike Quigley, Tom Peterson and Paul Palzer on Wednesday, November 28th to further discuss lighting and other issues associated with Eagle Pass. Attached is a copy of the letter sent from the City Administrator. Christmas Holiday. With regards to the Holiday Party, Staff agreed that either having a potluck at the end of a workday or going out to dinner would work. The idea of a potluck luncheon seemed to be of more interest. Since we are not meeting on 12/26, I would like to take the opportunity to visit family in Madison, Wisc. over Christmas. I would like to take 12/24 and 12/26 off and I understand that this time offwould be unpaid. Next Week's Calendar Thursday, November 22, 2001 Happy Thanksgiving! City offices will be closed. Friday, November 23,2001 City Hall closed in observance of Thanksgiving. Monday, November 26, 2001 6:30 p.m. - Budget Worksession Wednesday, November 28,2001 6:30 p.m. - City Council Meeting Attachments 1. Attached are copies of information from the League of Minnesota Cities and the State Commissioners' presentation. 2. Attached is a copy ofthe letter sent from the City Administrator. , League of Minnesota Cities Cities promoting excellence 145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 Phone: (651) 281-1200 (800) 925-1122 Fax: (651) 281-1299 TDD (651) 281-1290 November 16,2001 League of Minnesota Cities Members: Over the last few weeks, the League has been working to help city officials explain the complex property tax changes made during the last legislative session. We spent the month of October travelling to cities around the state for our annual Regional Meetings and a major topic has been property tax reform and how city budgets are impacted by the state aid changes. As you know, cities across the state are affected differently: while some cities are gaining state aid, many cities are losing state aid. Whether your city will lose or gain state aid, nothing is certain, and local officials still face difficult decisions about local budgets and explaining those decisions to the community. In an effort to help explain the property tax reform to your residents, the League has compiled a small information packet that may be helpful for citizens at an upcoming budget hearing or to use on your web site or in a newsletter. It includes Frequently Asked Questions about the 2001 Tax Bill, a City Budgeting Basics guide, and draft letters to the editor. All of the information attempts to outline in clear, simple language the major changes in education funding and how state aids to local governments are affected. I hope you find it useful. Please feel free to give me or Gary Carlson at the League a call if you have any questions about these tax changes or how the League is helping member cities in this communications effort. Sincerely, g~ -IfY/~ Jim Miller Executive Director AN EQUAL OPPORTUNlTY/AFF1RMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER City Budgeting Basics From the League of Minnesota Cities Handbook for Minnesota Cities Role and purposes of budgeting Generally, cities are required to prepare an annual budget, hold a property tax hearing*, and give notice of the proposed budget adoption. Certain forms of city government, such as home rule charter cities, may have additional requirements. A budget is a comprehensive financial plan for a specific period of time. It outlines city activities and service levels, and contains estimates of probable costs and available revenues during the coming year. It can be a tool through which cities can monitor spending, and it can also provide data which can be used in setting priorities for the use of city funds. In addition, it can be used to evaluate the level and quality of services the city has provided in previous years. Finally, it can be a source of information to city staff and taxpayers regarding the decisions and policies made by the city council. Besides an annual operating budget, cities should consider planning for spending on capital improvements. Many cities have discovered that efficient capital financing improves when they prepare, adopt, and implement a multi-year capital improvement program and budget. The multi-year capital budget matches available resources with proposed public improvements, facilities and equipment needs. One advantage of the capital programming process is a catalog of existing facilities and equipment. City employees can then estimate the lifespan of each public facility and piece of equipment, and prepare a calendar of projected replacement dates. An important part of the capital planning process should be a determination of the funding required each year to provide for orderly replacements without burdening the community with future high debt loads. Budget goals An important goal for cities is having a balanced budget. A budget is balanced when the expenditures are equal to revenues. The council will need to estimate the future expenditures and revenues of the city and make adjustments to balance the budget. Cities must estimate several kinds of expenditures. These can include such things as current expenses, capital outlay expenditures, and debt redemption. Certain basic expenditures consist of fixed charges and are comparatively east to estimate. These are items such as rent, interest expense, salaries, contractual costs, and other charges the city has established by agreement and cannot diminish during the budget year. Cities should also review their total revenue picture. Is the city making the best use of its taxing powers? Is the city tax rate adequate to meet the revenue needs of the city? Are the tax assessments distributed equitably among local taxpayers? Additionally, cities should review available intergovernmental grants and aids. Will the grants and aids used in prior years be available this year? Will there be any cuts that could impact the amounts the city might get? Will there be any new programs that might make the city eligible for additional amounts? Finally, cities must study the adequacy of other sources of city revenue. In particular, they should review whether license fees and charges for city services adequately cover the costs and expenses. Cities should also consider whether they should establish fees for other city service programs currently provided without charge, and whether the council and other boards are properly managing the disposition of reserve funds. The total estimated costs minus the anticipated revenues equals the amount that will need to be raised from the property tax levy. If the levy is too high, the city council will need to consider reducing expected costs (such as by eliminating programs or cutting services), increasing revenues (such as by raising license fees and service charges), or both. if the revenues are higher than the total estimated costs, a city may be able to reduce the amount of the property tax levy. City fund balances Despite a record-high budget surplus, the state is increasingly interested in the fund balances of local governments. The state annually debates whether to use any of its budget reserve, often called the "rainy day fund." The Department of Finance provides a complete explanation of the state's need for cash flow funds and a reserve for emergencies. State lawmakers are increasingly interested in getting accurate statistics on local balances and requiring cities to spend their fund balances. The need for cities to have adequate revenue to provide for emergencies or contingencies receives little credence, as was made apparent by the recent extension of levy limits. Cities' annual reports are likely to show high year-end balances because of the end-of the-year influx of revenues from property taxes and state aid. But these reports do not explain these funds need to cover nearly all operating expenses of a city for the first five to six months of the next calendar year. The year-end balance needs to carry most cities until they receive property tax revenues an state aid in May and June. In reporting fund balance data, the state auditor has acknowledged there is no single standard for figuring out what is an adequate fund balance. The League strongly urges cities to use the financial strategy of designating fund balances. When cities are saving for a large future purchase, they should document their specific intentions and the uses of these funds. Many have questioned the increasing practice of designating fund balances, saying that cities are attempting to "hide" their fund balances. Cities should expect additional scrutiny and criticism of their fund balances. At a minimum, cities should designate a working capital fund and designate adequate revenue for cash-flow to cover operating expenses for the first half of their next calendar year. Expenditures The following list is a summary of programs common to most cities. Each category includes special services or activities. The types of expenses that are included in each category will vary from city to city. A basic list of programs includes: General government Public safety Streets and highways Sanitation Health Libraries Parks and recreation Debt service Miscellaneous Budget considerations The following costs should be considered by cities when planning budgets. These types of expenses influence the costs of city government in all categories of expenditures. The broad areas of taxes and employment costs are: State taxes Federal taxes Wages and benefits Pension and requirement costs insurance expenditures Association dues Miscellaneous items For more detailed information about city budgeting, please visit the League of Minnesota Cities web site at www.lmnc.orq/librarv/handtoc.cfm. * Local governments are NOT required to hold truth in taxation hearings in 2001 for 2002 levies. 2001 Omnibus Tax Bill Frequently Asked Questions the League of Minnesota Cities What happened: The 2001 omnibus tax bill enacted several sweeping reforms to the Minnesota state/local finance system. The combined impact of these changes will mean that school property taxes will drop markedly while city property taxes will generally increase-in some cases dramatically. The governor proposed and the Legislature ultimately enacted a state takeover of the general education property taxes for school districts to fulfill what the governor saw as a huge state mandate on local school boards. Under the old education finance system, schools were required by the state to levy property taxes at a state-determined rate to fund education costs in that school district. If the tax rate did not generate enough revenue to fund the education costs for each pupil, the education finance formula would automatically allocate additional state resources to make up the difference. Although this state takeover will not entirely eliminate school property taxes, it will significantly reduce the school share of the typical taxpayer's bill. To fund the state takeover of general education costs, the Legislature enacted a number of other changes to the state's budget including eliminating the homestead and agricultural credit aid (HACA), enacting a state property tax and class rate reductions, and changing Local Government Aid appropriations and disbursements. Why was HACA eliminated and how are cities affected? There isn't a single, clear answer to this question. HACA was viewed by many legislators as an undefined state aid that had little purpose because the distributions were based on what cities had historically received, rather than on an active formula. Secondly, the elimination of HAC A gave the state more money to pay for some of the other property tax reforms that were enacted. Had it not been eliminated, HACA would have provided $200 million in state aid to cities in 2002. Wasn't LGA increased to make up for some loss of aid? Why do some cities receive more (or less) LGA in 2002 even though the appropriation was increased by $140 million? An additional $140 million was appropriated for Local Government Aid; however, this money was not evenly distributed among all cities. Some cities will receive a large enough increase in their LGA to completely make up for the loss of HACA. Still others will lose all of their HACA and receive less LGA than they did last year. Can cities increase their levies to cover their loss of aid? Yes. Even with levy limits, cities will be able to make up for lost state aids through the property tax. However, doing so will result in significant increases in a city's property tax levy. How are cities affected by new levy limits? Levy limits will be in place for 2002 and 2003 for all cities with populations more than 2,500. The state will calculate an allowable growth of a city's levy based on inflation, that city's household growth and its growth in commercial/industrial property. Levy limits also allow cities to "levy back" lost state aids. Local gQvernmentscan exceed theirlevylimitsto cover debt service, disaster costs, matching fund requirements, tax abaternenrrevies,-an(rtlle~P'l1mrcbmployees Retirement Account contribution increase mandated by the state. And with voter approval, counties and affected cities can exceed their levy limits for any reason. But the Legislature and governor have said most taxpayers will see property tax reductions. What do their estimates take into account? All of the analyses prepared by the House Research Department assumed that cities would replace 100 percent of lost state aid with property taxes. In other words, even with these increases in the city share of the property tax bill, taxpayers are expected to see property tax reductions in 2001. What about class rate reductions and how are city budgets affected? During the 2001 session, the Legislature approved class rate reductions for virtually every category of property. This will reduce the tax base of each jurisdiction, forcing the tax rate to increase in order to raise the same amount of money as they did last year. In the future, will schools levy any property taxes? Yes, school districts will still levy some property taxes including levies for community service, health and safety, integration and building leases. Many school districts also have additional voter approved levies for operation and debt service for capital projects. In fact, due to school district concerns about the level of available school revenue under the 2001 omnibus education funding bill, many school districts sought new or expanded voter approval for operating levies on Nov. 6. What about this new state property tax? The state will levy a new property tax that will be applied only to commercial, industrial and seasonal recreational (cabin) properties. The state tax will be administered just like any other local government's property tax levy and will be included as a line item on the property tax statement. The state property taxes will be deposited in the state's general fund and will therefore be available for general state spending. [November 2001) . DRAFT LETTER TO EDITOR FOR CITIES LOSING STATE AID IN 2001 Dear Editor: The 2001 tax bill passed last spring dramatically changed how many government services are funded. Under the new law, much of the cost for K-12 education will now be paid directly by the state rather than from local property taxes. That means that your school property taxes likely will go down. To help pay for this new education responsibility, the state reduced or eliminated the amount of money it historically gave many cities to share in the cost of providing public services like police, fire, street maintenance, parks and recreation programs. In fact, _[city name here]_ will lose $ . Because this state aid has been an important part of our city's budget, its loss forces the city to increase the city portion of your property tax bill. The levy increase to replace lost state aids is not surprising. The governor and Legislature fully expected cities to increase their property taxes to replace them. In fact, the state's own estimates of how much property taxes would be reduced next year assumed that cities would increase their property tax levies, dollar for dollar, to compensate for the lost aid. No city official relishes the thought of increasing property taxes - especially when the levy increase is needed simply to meet last year's budget. However, many cities, like the city of _[your city name here] , has to do just that to maintain the services our community needs and expects. Citizens should always hold local elected officials accountable for spending and taxing decisions, and this year is no different. However, I also believe it's important that our community understands how property tax changes made at the state level significantly impacted our city finances and local needs and priorities. Sincerely, , Mayor City of League of Minnesota Cities November 2001 DRAFT LETTER TO EDITOR FOR CITIES OVER 2,500 GAINING LGA IN 2002 Dear Editor: The 2001 tax bill passed last spring dramatically changed how many government services are funded. Under the new law, much of the cost for K-12 education will now be paid directly by the state rather than from local property taxes. That means that your school property taxes likely will go down. To help pay for this new education responsibility, the state reduced or eliminated the amount of money it historically gave many cities to share in the cost of providing public services like police, fire, street maintenance, parks and recreation programs. While some cities lost state aid, some cities, like ours, received an increase in state aid. In our case, this new aid translates directly into property tax reduction because the state also limits the combined amount of revenue from property taxes and aids that a city can spend. So, while positive for our taxpayers, the new aids are not a windfall of new money available for new or ongoing city services. This increase in aid may also mean the city budget is more vulnerable to downturns in the state's economy. Right now, the state appears to be facing a budget shortfall. Given that our city budget is now more reliant on state aids, a cut in these aid programs to balance the state budget could mean difficult decisions about community priorities in coming years. While we might have temporarily come out ahead, city officials realize that we must be prudent in how we budget for future years. We ask for your support in requesting that our state legislative delegation insist that the new state commitment to property tax relief be maintained into the future. Otherwise, your property taxes will be artificially increased. , Mayor City of DRAFT LETTER TO EDITOR FOR CITIES UNDER 2~500 GAINING LGA IN 2002 Dear Editor: The 2001 tax bill passed last spring dramatically changed how many government services are funded. Under the new law, much ofthe cost for K-12 education will now be paid directly by the state rather than from local property taxes. That means that your school property taxes likely will go down. To help pay for this new education responsibility, the state reduced or eliminated the amount of money it historically gave many cities to share in the cost of providing public services like police, fire, street maintenance, parks and recreation programs. While some cities lost state aid, some cities, like ours, received an increase in state aid. This helps us further reduce the property taxes of our citizens and businesses. However, it also means the city budget is more vulnerable to downturns in the state's economy. Right now, the state appears to be facing a budget shortfall. Given that our city budget is more reliant on state aids, a cut in these aid programs to balance the state budget could mean difficult decisions about community priorities in coming years. While we might have temporarily come out ahead, city officials realize that we must be conservative in how we budget for future years, not relying on this increase in aid for long-term planning. , Mayor City of LMC 145 University Avenue West, St Paul, MN 55103-2044 Phone: (651) 281-1200 (800) 925-1122 TDD (651) 281-1290 LMC Fax: (651) 281-1299 LMCIT Fax: (651) 281-1298 , Web Site: http://www.lmnc.org Lzague 0/ MinneSota Cioes Cities promoting e:ccslJencB 2001 Omnibus Tax Bill: Frequently Asked Questions Q: What was the policy rationale that is driving the 2001 property tax reforms? A: One way to describe the tax outcomes is that the' Governor and the many legislators wanted the property tax to be more of a locally determined tax. Given that school property taxes have largely been Set oy the state, ~e takeover of generaleducation levies became a cornerstone of the governor's plan, the House tax bill and the [mal tax package. On the other hand, given that city services are primarily determined by city councils, the governor and legislature found that these services ~E.9Eld be more fully ~.E-orted by the p!:9perty tax. In other words, by removing a large share of school funding from the property tax, cities and counties would be more able to tap the prope[!y tax to f!:mJi their services. - ---- Q: Isn't this rationale flawed by the existence of levy limits and the new state property tax? A: Yes, the fact that levy limits were included in the final tax package means that cities will not be able to fully exercise their discretion about service levels and property taxes. In addition, although the new state property tax is only paid by commercial, industrial and cabin property owners, it is certainly not a local tax. Q: Wasn't simplicity one of the goals of property tax reform? A: Simplicity may have been an initial goal of tax reform but the final tax package arguably does little to simplify the system. . . Q: The Legislature and Governor have estimated that most taxpayers will see their overall property tax bill reduced. Do these estimates reflect the fact that many cities will have to increase their property tax levies to replace lost state aids? A: The estimates assume that cities will replace, dollar-for-dollar, lost state aid with increased property taxes. In other words, even with these increases in the city,share of the property tax bill, taxpayers are expected to see a tax reduction in 2002. Q: Will the levy limits enacted in the tax bill allow the city to replace lost state aids? A: Yes, cities covered by levy limits (those over 2,500 population) will be allowed to replace lost state aids with property taxes. In a sense, the term levy limits are somewhat of a misnomer. A more accurate term might be revenue limits. Levy limits are essentially based on the total ofthe city's property tax and state aids from the previous year. To the degree that state aids are reduced or eliminated, the allowable property tax levy authority increases. Conversely, if state aids increase, levy authority is reduced. Q: Won't the city property tax increases to replace lost state aids draw intense criticism from our taxpayers? A: This could happen, particularly if city officials are not prepared to explain the legislative changes enacted this year. However, due to the magnitude of the changes to the tax system, the parcel-specific notices sent to taxpayers this fall will not itemize the 200 i city taxes and the 2002 proposed city taxes. The only direct comparison on the form will be the total 2001 taxes to the proposed 2002 total taxes. This structure will hopefully avoid any wmecessary taxpayer concerns about increases in city levies due to lost state aids. Despite this one-year change in the parcel-specific notice, you will still want to be prepared to explain these changes to taxpayers. For example, rather than focusing solely on the change in the property tax levy, a more complete statistic might be the change in total budgeted expenditures, which would factor out significant changes in state aids. Q: Levy limits will be in place for two years. Should we levy "to the limit" so that the city preserves its levy authority jQr future years? A: Each city council will have to make a decision on local needs and the level of property taxes needed. Fortunately, levy limits are structured so that unused levy authority in any year is carried fonvard for future years. This structure was established so that cities and counties would not be encouraged to simply levy to the limit. Of course, the legislature could always change this provision but the "if you don't use it you won't lose it" structure of levy limits seems to have broad 1egi~lative support. Q: Why was HAeA eliminated? A: The answer is not simple but the overall cost of the tax bill, including the state takeover of the total general education costs for schools, required the state to reprioritize its appropriations. Many legislators viewed HACA as an undefined state aid that had little purpose largely due to the fact that there is no active fOffi1Ula to determine HACA distributions. The $200 million in HACA that had been distributed to cities was used to pay for the costs associated with the overall tax reform package. Q: Will the Fiscal Dispa7'ities p7'Ogram be affected by the significant class rate reductions contained in the tax bill? A: For 2002, the interaction of the tax reforms and fiscal disparities program will have no net impact on city finances. The fiscal disparities program is computed based upon property tax values from the previous year. Therefore, the amount of property taxes ultimately distributed to each city under the fiscal disparities program will not be affected. Q: In the future, will school districts levy any property toxes? A: Yes, school districts will still levy some property taxes including levies for community service, health and safety, integration and building leases. Many school districts also impose additional voter approved levies for operation and debt service for capital projects. In fact, due to school district concerns about the level of available school revenue under the 2001 omnibus education funding bill, there are preliminary indications that many school districts may seek new or expanded voter approval for operating levies. . Q: Won 't cabins andfarmers be exemptfrom payingfor voter approved school levies? A: Yes, fann land and cabin properties have been,exempted from paying for voter approved school operating levies. This will affect existing as well as future voter-approved operating levies for schools as well as voter-approved debt levies for cities and counties. Q: If cabins andfarm land are exemptfrom these voter-approved levies, wan't their share of the taxes be shifted to city taxpayers? A: Taxpayers within cities will largely be protected from shifts in these levies due to the fact that the state will "equalize" the voter-approved operating levies. Equalizing means that the shifts in propeliy taxes that would otherwise occur will be prevented though increased state aid. Q: Will the state levy a property tax? A: Yes, the state will levy a new $592 million property tax that will be applied only to commercial, industrial and seasonal recreational (cabin) properties. TIle state tax will be administered just like any other local government's property tax levy and will be included as a line item on the property tax statement. The state property taxes will initially be deposited in the state's general fund and will therefore be available for general state spending. The state property tax levy will be annually inflated and the increases will be deposited in a new education re~erve account. Q: Will the class rate reductions included in the tax bill reduce our property tax collections? A: With the exception oftax collections in tax increment districts, the state's classification system does not directly affect how much a city will collect in property taxes. TIle classification system simply determines who will pay the property taxes levied by the city, county, school district and any special taxing authorities rather than how much the city will collect, Q: The only class afproperty that was not granted a class rate reduction was low value homesteads. Will their taxes increase? A: The class rate applied to the first $76,000 of homestead value will remain at 1 percent. This is the only major property class that did not receive a class rate reduction. However, at least in the short term, taxes on even these properties will likely be reduced due to two factors. First, lower value homes will receive a new market value homestead credit that effectively translates into the state paying a portion of each qualifying homeowner's tax bill. In addition, all prop'erty owners including Jaw value homes will pay significantly lower taxes to schools due to the state takeover of general education costs. According to legislative estimates, the combined effect of these changes will reduce taxes for most low valued homes. Q: How does the new homestead credit work? A: The credit is equal to 0.4 percent of the market value of the home up to a maximum value of $76,000. For homes valued in excess of$76,000, the credit is gradually reduced by $9 for every $10,000 of the home's market value in excess of$76,000. Therefore, the credit is entirely eliminated for homes valued in excess of$414,000. The homestead credit will not be paid directly to homeowners. Each homeowner will have their property tax bill reduced by the amount of the credit. The city, county, school district and any special taxing authority will receive their total expected tax revenues from a combination of the remaining homeowner taxes and the state paid homestead credit. Q: Our city has a charter provision that restricts our ability to increase taxes that did not anticipate large cuts in state aids. What can we do to replace lost state aids? A: The 2001 omnibus tax bill includes an override of city charters that in certain circumstances will allow charter cities with restrictive levy limits to replace lost state aids. Q: Will the future phase-out of limited market value eventually shift taxes to homes? A: Under state statute, limited market value was due to sunset after taxes payable in 2002. The tax bill actually delays the elimination of the statute by phasing it out over a six-year period. This will increase the taxable value of homes and cabins that currently benefit from limited market value and ultimately shift property taxes to homeowners. Future legislatures will likely have to address any taxpayer fallout due to the impacts of the phase-out of limited market value. Q: Why will my city receive less LGA in 2002 despite that fact that thelegislature increased the overall appropriation by $140 million? A: The governor proposed and the legislature adopted several changes to the LGA system that modify the distribution of the LGA appropriation. These changes generally provide more aid to first class cities (Minneapolis, 81. Paul and Duluth) as well as outstate regional centers over 10,000 population. Although these cities will receive inore state aid, their levy limitations will be lower than it would have been in the absence ofthe aid increase due to the interaction ofIevy limits and state aid. Also, at the close of the legislative session, several key lawmakers indicated that the LGA system, including the 2001 changes, would be the subj ect of legislative review, possibly as early as 2002. In other words, the stability of these increases could be short-lived. Q: How will tax increment financing districts be impacted.? A: Many existing TIF districts will experience TIP reductions from 20 to 40 percent. These reductions are due to the combined impact of the state takeover of the general education levy and the property tax class rate changes. Future districts will generate increments largely from the city and county tax rates since a large share of the current school property tax has been eliminated. Q: Are there any mechanisms to address impacts on TIP existing districts? , ^ 1';~ A: Yes, there is the TIF grant program with a significantly increased state fmancial commitment, expanded pooling authority, and a new special..deficit authority. Procedures and qualification requirements are fairly complex. Since impacts from this year's tax bill will not be experienced until 2002, applications for TIF grants will not be due until August 1,2003. Q: How will the slowing economy affect the state's ability to pay for commitments in the 2001 tax bill? A: At this time, it is unclear what impact the slowing economy will have on the state's tax revenues as well as expenditure commitments. The state did set aside additional resources in their rainy day fund to prepare for a slowing economy. However, these resources are generally one-time monies that 1nay not cover a protracted state budget shortfall. If the upcoming state budget forecasts show long term softening in the state's revenues, the governor and legislature will likely have to revisit existing programs, which could include LGA. September 20,2001 HRD Issues & Information: Property Taxes Page 1 of3 M.... +"'i . .........nnesOi.a Hous~ of Representatives t._tl$laWreKOnte'r SUrcltl ~Pl t.Jnk$t.O tbC Wot'fd HOUle ft,esearcl1 House Research Issues & Information: Property Taxes Class Rates for Taxes Payable in 2002 I Property Type II Pay 2001 II Pay 2002 I Subject to Subject to Class Class State Referendum Rate Rate Tax? Levies? I Disabled homestead up to $32,000 1/ 0.45% II 0.45% II no /1 yes I I Residential Homestead ." i.-" ~. ". . I ., . ... I Up to $76,000 II 1.0 II 1.0 II no II yes I I $76,000-$500,000 II 1.65 1/ 1.0 II no II yes ) I Over $500,000 II 1.65 II 1.25 II no II yes I I Residential N onhomestead I I Single unit I I Up to $76,000 II 1.2 II 1.0 II no II yes I I $76,000-$500,000 II 1.65 .'11 1.0 II no II yes I I Over $500,000 II 1-.65 /1 1.25 II no II yes I 12-3 unit and undeveloped land II 1.65 II 1.51 II no II yes I I Apartments I I Regular II 2.4 II 1.82 II no II yes I I Small city 1/ 2.15 II' 1.82 II no II yes I I Low-income II 1.0 II 0.93 II no II yes I I Commercial-Industrial-Public Utility I I Up to $150,000 II 2.4 II 1.5 II yes II yes I I Over $150,000 II 3.4 II 2.0 II yes II yes I I Electric generation machinery II 3.4 II 2.0 II no II yes I I Seasonal Recreational Commercial I I Homestead resorts (1 c) II 1.0 " 1.0 'I no " yes I http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/hrd/issinfo/clrate2002.htm 11/8/2001 HRD Issues & Information: Property Taxes Page 2 of3 I Seasonal resorts (4c) I I Up to $500,000 II 1.65 /I 1.0 II yes II yes I I Over $500,000 II 1.65 ,II 1.25 II yes II yes I I Seasonal Recreational Residential .. I I Up to $76,000 II 1.2 II 1.0 II yes 4 II no I I $76,000-$500,000 II 1.65 II 1.0 II yes 1/ no I I Over $500,000 'I 1.65 II 1.25 1/ yes II no I I Agricultural Land & Buildings I I Homestead 5 I I Up to $115,000 II 0.35 II 0.55 II no II no I , $115,000-$600,000 II 0.8 If 0.55 II no II no I I Over $600,000 II 1.2 /I 1.0 II no II no I I Nonhomestead II 1.2 II 1.0 II no II no I I Miscellaneous Properties I I Golf courses (open to public) II 1.65 II 1.25 II no II yes I I Nonprofit service organizations II 1.65 II 1.5 II no II yes I I I Fraternity/sorority houses II 1.2 II 1.0 II no " no I I Manufactured home park land II 1.65 II 1.5 I II no 'II yes I Metro indoor recreational c:J~c:J1 yes I facilities I Noncommercial aircraft hangars II 1.65 H :~I -1;5 II no 1/ yes I 1 Rate reduced to 1.25% in pay 2003 and thereafter. 2 Rate reduced to 1.5% in pay 2003 and 1.25% in pay 2004 and thereafter. 3 Rate increased to 1.0% in pay 2003, classification abolished in pay 2004. 4 Taxed at 40% of regular state rate. S House, garage, and one acre has same class rates and treatment as residential homestead. Return to Issues & Information: Propertv Taxes Return to House Research home I~ _,II!.~ .4 ,I!.'!OoSilRl' ~ I ,Ul~~IIl~ v ~ I ~;.J$ll;~ - !l;i1o'511m~~'V;;<;tr Please direct all comments concerning issues or legislation to your House Member or State Senator. http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/hrd/issinfo/c1rate2002.htm 11/8/2001 House Research Department Date: September 7,2001 Run: totsav05 Property Tax changes due to changes in aids and credits under the Omnibus Tax Bill ( 2001 Special Session, Chapter 5) The attached run shows the net change in property taxes in each city due to the combined effects of: the state education levy takeover; the new state property tax; the new state credits; the net effect of city aid changes; and the effect of the transit relief in both the metropolitan area and out-state region. A negative number indicates a decrease in property taxes while a positive number indicates an increase in property taxes paid by taxpayers in that city. Caveats: The run does not show the effects of any shifts in tax between properties due to the class rate changes nor does it reflect any increases in property tax refunds to low-income taxpayers under the expansion of that program. Because some of the changes affect only certain types of taxpayers while others affect all taxpayers in the jurisdiction, the table does not show the impact on an individual taxpayer (see column 7 below). Columns in the table: Column 1: Column 2: Column 3: Column 4: Column 5: Column 6: Column 7: Column 8: City population for 2000 from the U.S. Census. Net decrease in school property taxes due to the takeovers of the general education levy and $415 per pupil of school referendum levy including the reduction in the area wide fiscal disparity levy. New state tax paid only by businesses and seasonal-recreational property. New homestead and agricultural credits which lower taxes only for homes and farms. The net effect on property taxes due to the elimination of city HACA and the increased funding of city LGA, assuming that cities levy back all lost aid (and reduce property taxes for any net increase in aid). The decrease in property taxes from the state takeover of the transit levy in the metropolitan area and the transit aid in the out-state region including the reduction in the area wide fiscal disparity levy. The reduction in taxes due to the decreased increment in Tax Increment Finance (TIF) districts resulting from the class rate changes. The total decrease (or increase) in property taxes paid by taxpayers in the city due to the combination of the changes in columns 2 through 7. House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 1 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change County/ Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief TIF in Prop.Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8=5um of2-7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -------..- ----------- ----------- Metro ANOKA ANDOVER 26588 -3978266 754352 -1862029 524942 -93058 -55000] -5,204,060 ANOKA ]8076 -3081650 2277081 -1086]41 652960 -406483 -1244039 -2,888,272 BETHEL 443 -74988 51746 -34643 12922 -2504 0 -47,467 BLAINE 44942 -9734464 5877239 -3297232 2116524 -1259309 -905420 -7,202,662 CENTERVILLE 3202 -767964 150226 -266914 141723 -64065 -14387 -821,382 CIRCLE PINES 4663 -723409 140062 -424269 255325 -75410 -65236 -892,937 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 18520 -1546865 1055180 -1589566 934988 -342731 -481147 -1 , 970, ] 42 COON RAPIDS 61607 -11663100 7217060 -4756255 3099448 -1627498 -1460910 -9,191,255 EAST BETHEL 10941 -1326555 306452 -818834 252683 -33471 0 -1,619,726 FRIDLEY CITY 27449 -7538744 6362516 -1888322 1393542 -950770 -1395992 -4,017,771 !lAM LAKE 12710 -2754027 847268 -860278 208636 -62637 0 -2,621,038 HILLTOP 766 -85924 62684 -6842 25712 -9303 -11532 -25,205 LEXINGTON 2214 -376747 165898 -124436 -22763 -31518 -37588 -427,153 LINO LAKES 16791 -3978146 900218 -1078293 481420 -354805 -581545 -4,611,151 OAK GROVE 6903 -1009148 ]29342 -518049 132671 -22951 0 - 1 , 288 , 136 RAMSEY 18510 -2861665 1689592 -1364315 646803 -88825 -1463064 -3,441,474 SPRING LAKE PARK 6772 -1194703 800188 -512170 270572 -174605 -98969 -909,688 ST FRANCIS 4910 -727946 214298 -337085 168905 -17143 -426 -699,397 County Total 286007 -53424313 29001401 -20825673 11297013 -5617087 -8310255 -47,878,914 CARVER .ARVER 1266 -267694 28152 -117322 50103 -4609 -4969 -3]6,339 CHANHASSEN 20321 -6332222 3200451 -1176704 1069163 - 782481 -3509454 - 7, 531 ,247 CHASKA 17449 -4377048 3060972 -911277 103064 -486176 -2812287 -5,422,752 COLOGNE 1012 -104004 40639 -96529 18082 -3253 -4597 -149,662 HAMBURG 538 -35809 12956 -46034 47236 -1317 0 -22,969 MAYER 554 -60052 33943 -43981 24 172 -1853 0 -47,770 NEW GERMANY 346 -34156 13813 -34749 23]63 - 1062 0 -32,991 NORWOOD/YG AMERICA 3108 -394293 247820 -230895 91543 -13293 -1051 -300,168 VICTORIA 4025 -1468590 143448 -224245 190034 -22683 -44886 -1,426,922 WACONIA 6814 -1377485 544253 -525024 275570 -33469 -186329 -1,302,485 WATERTOWN 3029 -254005 95645 -192979 50966 -7711 -44405 -352,490 County Total 58462 -14705358 7422092 -3599740 1943096 -1357908 -6607977 -16,905,795 DAKOTA APPLE VALLEY 45527 -10292452 3452120 -3164293 2774400 -1238954 -708406 -9, 177.586 BURNSVILLE 60220 -19741218 10617280 -3637811 3332073 -2631837 -1909222 -13,970,734 COATES 163 -51419 33554 -11860 3041 -1550 0 -28,234 EAGAN 63557 -24922475 13462816 -4031210 2098017 -2856216 -200990 -16,450,058 FARMINGTON 12365 -2457026 652419 -964557 519203 -41911 -651293 -2,943, ]66 HAMPTON 434 -52549 20548 -34100 25594 -1324 0 -41 ,831 HASTINGS 18204 -3164606 1344287 -1241716 1199100 -72673 -104004 -2,039,612 INVER GROVE HGTS 29751 -6105788 2644395 -1881766 1130093 -868543 -1263247 -6,344,855 LAKEVILLE 43128 -11939121 3348659 -2588416 1749190 -224438 -908550 -10,562,676 LILYDALE 552 -318367 86460 -51842 7171 -33727 -7097 -317,402 MENDOTA 197 -39522 24341 -14977 24612 -4614 0 -10,160 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND Comrty List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 2 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change COUllty/ Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief TIF in Prop.Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (B=sUDI of2-7) --------------~---- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Metro DAKOTA MENDOTA HEIGHTS 11434 -4598715 2543399 -640304 464720 -493228 -1366436 -4,090,562 MIESVILLE 135 -30397 14783 -11981 1913 -842 0 -26,524 NEW TRIER 116 -7646 3039 -7667 3059 -210 0 -9.425 RANDOLPH 318 -42301 11815 -29672 13131 -950 0 -47,977 ROSEMOUNT 14619 -3956965 2011648 -998644 577707 -507269 -210976 -3,084,498 SOUTH STPAUL 20167 -2354690 1450203 -1597203 980436 -386410 -816822 -2,724,486 SUNFISH LAKE 504 -454767 7976 -1840 44805 -39465 0 -443,291 VERMILLION 437 -45887 12320 -37471 35271 -1303 0 -37,070 WEST ST PAUL 19405 -3742202 1724800 -1297480 1259768 -543608 -146944 -2,745,666 County Total 341233 -94318113 43466863 -222448.11 16243304 -9949071 -8293985 -75,095,813 HENNEPIN BLOOMINGTON 85172 -43508371 33335817 -5770243 3727749 -5299266 -6411556 -23,925,870 BROOKLYN CENTER 29172 -5382640 4457553 -2214182 1541663 -765435 -1436353 -3,799,394 BROOKLYN PARK 67388 -11175107 7998915 -4625179 3243542 -1656085 -4593763 -10.807,676 CHAMPLIN 22193 -2326570 1094458 -1644634 1208857 -416444 -1330512 -3,414.844 CORCORAN 5630 -1611631 310675 ~338154 215341 -28046 -90587 -1 ,542,402 CRYSTAL 22698 -2567199 1438591 -2000464 1250452 -512621 -615048 -3,006,289 DAYTON 4699 -991311 325160 -290844 220992 -24609 -63714 -824,325 DEEPHAVEN 3853 -2106129 188053 -98405 221942 - 264710 0 -2,059,248 EDEN PRAIRIE 54901 -32419452 16389224 -2860654 1145195 -3194178 -124698 -21,064,563 EDINA 47425 -27193117 13793681 -2359459 979864 -3517852 -4187181 -22,484,064 EXCELSIOR 2393 -762595 339875 -97043 111276 -95406 0 -503,892 GOLDEN VALLEY 20281 -9139552 7030100 -1529859 1759647 -1231730 -1519412 -4,630,805 GREENFIELD 2544 -986912 100636 -139581 81988 -12659 0 -956,529 GREENWOOD 729 -502940 77643 -17320 38993 -58838 0 -462,462 HOPKINS 17145 -4428009 3148718 -762267 1080140 -600564 -1081317 -2,643,299 INDEPENDENCE 3236 -1406453 150842 -169664 183309 -21993 0 -1,263,960 LONG LAKE 1842 -573354 401216 -126062 150595 -73970 -97947 -319,523 LORETTO 570 -206506 63812 -46161 18262 -3906 0 -174.499 MAPLE GROVE 50365 -16112144 8211525 -3777878 2149318 -1734173 -2016444 -13,279.797 MAPLE PLAIN 2088 -448237 393256 -119869 73800 -15240 -155737 -272,027 MEDICINELAKE 368 -154706 8050 -11178 15842 -18319 0 -160,311 MEDINA 4005 -2892192 921290 -129390 221925 -56841 -27920 -1,963,128 MINNEAPOLIS 382618 -99666208 71499527 -20209671 -371296 -11767904 -31669290 -92,184,842 1f1NNETONKA 51301 -27063982 16703152 -3011725 2100830 -3542600 -1768114 -16.582,440 MINNETONKA BEACH 614 -561885 34891 -8039 69471 -71659 0 -537.221 MINNETRISTA 4358 -2528966 158956 -135889 280109 -36198 0 -2,261,989 MOUND 9435 -1934299 307819 -733904 520756 -311140 -85746 -2.236,514 NEW HOPE 20873 -4811781 2953467 -1209792 1234100 -679932 -442976 -2.956,914 ORONO 7538 -5547843 520318 -220275 309627 -699174 0 -5.637,346 OSSEO 2434 -646395 482896 -160922 -53071 -69234 -229621 -676,347 PLYMOUTH 65894 -31094093 17391725 -3727575 1852073 -3525901 _256246 -19.360,017 RICHFIELD 34439 -5062298 3220072 -2661920 2438873 -868606 -1905946 -4,839,826 ROBBINSDALE 14123 -1175267 649784 -1227349 789763 -270582 -552287 -1,785,940 ROGERS 3588 -2416191 2160138 -286515 31241 -52891 -1746916 -2,311,134 SHOREWOOD 7400 -2921474 313129 -257262 427003 -388751 0 -2,827,355 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 3 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) e Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change County/ Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief' TIF in Prop.Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8=sum o:f2- 7) ------------------- ------....-- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Metro HENNEPIN SPRING PARK 1717 -675097 262780 -42801 11 9358 -67541 -78063 -481,364 ST ANTHONY 8012 -1224845 702194 -567754 361028 -235702 -494182 -1,459,260 ST BONIFACIUS 1873 -354500 118122 -148068 1 1723 -8659 -20034 -401,415 ST LOUrS PARK 44126 -13099683 9501347 -3233381 289826 I -1987733 -2088954 -8,OlD,143 TONKA BAY 1547 -925218 96653 -48267 78797 -107lDO 0 -905,134 WAYZATA 4113 -3711122 2004189 -121331 287485 -437730 -828143 -2,806,652 WOODLAND 480 -612175 14077 -5955 32879 -64072 0 -635,246 County Total 1115180 -372928447 229274322 -67146885 33059702 -44795995 -65918707 -288,456,010 RAMSEY ARDEN HILLS 9652 -4274886 2903352 -490637 99994 -504498 -304721 -2,571,396 FALCON HEIGHTS 5572 -668798 223288 -280591 215608 -131305 -63563 -705,360 GEM LAKE 419 -257129 134275 -25887 9043 -24140 0 -163,837 LAUDERDALE 2364 -315925 234789 -161767 -93581 -57140 -97437 -491,061 LITTLE CANADA 9771 -2230704 1288732 -557244 419172 -314107 -96378 -1,490,529 MAPLEWOOD 34947 -13440949 8863695 -2406447 1599169 -1621275 -215783 -7,221,589 MOUNDS VIEW 12738 -1474302 1209801 -774861 478765 -250074 -1002375 -1,813,045 NEW BRIGHTON 22206 -4054268 2097587 -1343625 992090 -628542 -1248834 -4.185,592 NORTH OAKS 3883 -3183856 214586 -24335 94520 -373703 0 -3,272,787 NORTH STPAUL 11929 -1504591 599478 -888046 342731 -273426 -116493 -1,840,347 OSEVILLE 33690 -12599263 11 061038 -2371530 1781772 -1637437 -3899703 -7,665,123 HOREVIEW 25924 -6185331 2437785 -1971232 1011184 -939385 -825760 -6,472,739 ST PAUL 287151 -45468167 31843537 -15920002 -265446 -6546594 -98.60125 -46,216,797 VADNAIS HEIGHTS 13069 -4193601 2618135 -942795 379234 -512996 -948005 -3;600,028 WHITE BEAR LAKE 23974 -5061234 2403657 -1834013 1058644 -745051 -650661 -4,828,658 County Total 497289 -104913003 68133735 -29993010 8122899 -14559671 -19329838 -92,538,889 SCOTT BEllE PLAINE 3789 -482431 265939 -303158 85659 -15175 -184663 -633,830 ELKO 472 -88055 13704 -40795 25168 -1599 0 -91,578 JORDAN 3833 -509442 190739 -245557 62690 -12470 -108614 -622,654 NEW MARKET 332 -71468 12791 -41964 22710 -1324 0 -79,255 PRIOR LAKE 15917 -3511104 598573 - 1081867 933772 -434224 -98427 -3,593,277 SAVAGE 21115 -4379011 1413808 -1484326 600597 -719715 -707694 -5,276,341 SHAKOPEE 20568 -7401956 6156050 -1664553 560997 -798844 -869313 -4.017,620 County Total 66026 -16443467 8651604 -4862221 2291593 -1983351 -1968712 -14,314,554 WASHINGTON AFTON 2839 -1187464 197607 -170838 115922 -21379 -2155 -1,068,308 BAYPORT 3162 -612130 363061 -145540 106054 -80017 -72726 -441,297 BIRCHWOOD 968 -282442 8820 -61340 54008 -30265 0 -311,220 COTTAGE GROVE 30582 -4334877 1509645 -2298103 1634490 -708136 -126513 -4,323,493 DELUmOD 1033 -943652 151806 -4142 43496 -77649 0 -830,141 FOREST LAKE 6798 -1802270 1361782 -401415 335721 -59441 -323807 -889,431 GRANT 4026 -1787356 137028 -179242 54048 -28420 0 -1,803,942 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 4 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change County / Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief TIF in Prop. Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8=sum 0:f2 -7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Metro WASHINGTON HUGO 6363 -1724326 534988 -463260 226745 -36376 -77388 -I , 539,617 LAKE ELMO 6863 -2299581 420519 -308333 184622 -239071 0 -2,241,844 LAKE ST CROIX BEAC 1140 -131086 15687 -109283 44302 -3314 0 -183,694 LAKELAND 1917 -375291 69175 -147793 23994 -8245 0 -438,160 LAKELAND SHORE 355 -120129 8364 -19148 3902 -2033 0 -129,044 LANDFALL 700 -21416 43500 0 55492 -1680 1909310 1,985,206 MAHTOMEDI 7563 -1790821 253876 -446269 327663 -215715 -142546 -2,013,812 MARINE-ON-ST CROIX 602 -332866 35013 -42420 47338 -5147 0 -298,082 NEWPORT 3715 -937096 681749 -246623 140145 -1l1598 -232362 -705,785 OAK PARK HEIGHTS 3957 -2581187 1197414 -266084 79603 -269358 0 -1,839,612 OAKDALE 26653 -4550999 2866452 -2034175 1187879 -649927 -1622422 -4,803,193 PINE SPRINGS 421 -132980 7389 -21758 2380 -14233 0 -159,202 ST MARYS POINT 344 -133192 19005 -24188 6026 -1977 0 -134,327 ST PAUL PARK 5070 -410054 236391 -400247 210421 -82974 -138278 -584,741 STILLWATER 15143 -3538107 1699382 -1086881 851651 -476003 -757076 -3,307,033 WILLERNIE 549 -60887 32424 -51018 37923 -9365 0 -50,923 WOODBURY 46463 -18426588 6529298 -3172873 1335493 -1747358 -80644 -15,562,673 County Total 177226 -48516794 18380374 -12100972 7109318 -4879685 -1666609 -41 , 674,368 Region Total 2541423 -705249496 404330391 -160773313 80066925 -83142768 -112096083 -576,864,344 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 5 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change Countyl Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits Z002Aids Relief TIP in Prop. Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8=sum of'Z-7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Non-metro AITKIN AITKIN 1984 -304214 284272 -103951 -28628 0 -271547 -424,067 HILL CITY 479 -42794 26142 -23851 45700 0 0 5,197 MCGRATH 65 -2364 905 -1976 434 0 0 -3,000 MCGREGOR 404 -54602 51273 -12799 3802 0 -21450 -33,776 PALISADE 118 -8001 4649 -5567 -2140 0 0 -11 ,059 TAMARACK 59 -6020 3300 -2911 2186 0 0 -3,445 County Total 3109 -417994 370543 -151055 21354 0 -292997 -470,149 BECKER AUDUBON 445 -50033 44413 -19851 6484 0 0 -18,987 CALLAWAY 200 -14642 12832 -7499 -155 0 0 -9,465 DETROIT LAKES 7348 -1434980 1124275 -505049 107727 0 -211078 -919,105 FRAZEE 1377 -72111 34876 -51117 -31297 0 -20975 -140,624 LAKE PARK 782 -65207 38772 -38202 947 0 0 -63,691 OGEMA 143 -4575 3737 -5853 _ 600 0 0 -6,090 WOLF LAKE 31 -2215 1443 -2204 416 0 0 -2,560 County Total 10326 -1643765 1260348 -629775 84722 0 -232053 -1.160,522 BELTRAMI mUDJI 11917 -2022212 1234350 -455347 -895345 0 -268909 -2,407.463 dLACKDUCK 696 -55918 53429 -25199 -8349 0 -7164 -43.201 FUNKLEY 15 -496 388 -379 0 0 0 -487 KELLIHER 294 14317 9662 -11892 -4227 0 0 7,859 SaLWAY 69 -7289 4511 -3954 -477 0 0 -7,209 TENSTRIKE 195 -9166 7260 -16665 2115 0 0 -16,456 TURTLE RIVER 75 -9400 3441 -6633 221 0 0 -12.370 WILTON 186 -21771 11490 -13497 621 0 0 -23,157 County Total 13447 -2111936 1324530 -533565 -905441 0 -276073 -2,502.485 BENTON FOLEY 2154 -210508 130616 -134480 -100708 0 -93079 -408, 158 GILMAN 215 -14413 5181 -16278 2659 0 0 -22,851 RICE 711 -205947 88185 -64150 16268 0 0 -165,643 RONNEBY 16 -4370 2565 -2422 805 0 0 -3,422 SAUK RAPIDS 10213 -1652043 784163 -697507 -330025 0 -1106513 -3,001,926 County Total 13309 -2087281 1010710 -914836 -411001 0 -1199592 -3,602,001 BIG STONE BARRY 25 -5933 4735 -535 985 0 0 -748 BEARDSLEY 262 -11376 6778 -8015 -5812 0 0 -18,425 CLINTON 453 -15905 7896 -16520 14944 0 0 -9,585 CORRELL 47 -2682 1906 -1442 -1867 0 0 -4,084 GRACEVILLE 605 -27869 16152 -29733 -20559 0 0 -62,008 JOHNSON 32 -2340 1586 -805 -118 0 0 -1,677 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 6 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change County / Population Takeovers Prop, Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief TIF in Prop.Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8=sum of2-7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Non-metro BIG STONE ODESSA 113 -8686 4079 -3345 3285 0 0 -4,667 ORTONVILLE 2158 -184084 73961 -129797 31281 0 -8106 -216,745 County Total 3695 -258874 117094 -190192 22139 0 -8106 -317,940 BLUE EARTH AMBOY 575 -34762 14812 -41989 13032 0 -867 -49,774 EAGLE LAKE 1787 -125290 35303 -123647 -13564 0 -3473 -230,672 GOOD THUNDER 592 -30444 10499 -42733 24267 0 -5060 -43,470 LAKE CRYSTAL 2420 -165764 63754 -175650 -65882 0 -56946 -400,488 MADISON LAKE 837 -62087 26166 -59331 13550 0 -16597 -98,299 MANKATO 32427 -6721028 5099750 -1527294 -1594466 -128094 -1209719 -6,080,851 MAPLETON 1678 -113484 40730 -115671 -1245 0 -3370 -193,041 PEMBERTON 246 -17843 7579 -18740 9842 0 0 -19,161 SKYLINE 330 -31995 394 -30630 15031 0 0 -47,200 ST CLAIR 827 -.41528 11342 -67140 -9513 0 -57318 -164,157 VERNON CENTER 359 -24841 13021 -27628 17101 0 -192 -22,538 County Total 42078 -7369066 5323351 -2230453 -1591847 -128094 -1353542 -7.349,651 BROWN COBDEN 61 -5265 4122 -2848 151 0 0 -3,841 COMFREY 367 -20032 20781 -23723 22145 0 -1972 -2.802 EVAN 91 -3895 1299 -3662 1660 0 0 -4.597 HANSKA 443 -23604 17726 -28802 4927 0 -.1257 -31,011 NEW ULM 13594 -1458399 1057376 -1044473 -539385 0 -373883 -2,358.764 SLEEPY EYE 3515 -239111 121755 -266102 -71286 0 -20731 -475,476 SPRINGFIELD 2215 -71927 63723 -134901 -52155 0 -29314 -224,574 County Total 20286 -1822234 1286781 -1504512 -633943 0 -427157 -3,101,065 CARLTON BARNUM 525 -46027 23381 -22309 10452 0 -4752 -39,255 CARLTON 810 -48196 38871 -52659 -8250 0 0 -70,234 CLOQUET 11201 -1707817 1448210 -799746 -251408 -8579 -484016 -1,803,356 CROMWELL 143 -22739 11485 -8138 7593 0 0 -11,799 KETILE RIVER 168 -11657 7394 -8270 3056 0 0 -9,477 MOOSE LAKE 2239 -141863 109169 -73929 -19644 0 -39424 -165,691 SCANLON 838 -82124 37686 -83576 39479 0 0 -88,535 THOMSON 153 -21835 18798 -10999 3609 0 0 -10,426 WRENS HALL 308 -44120 28574 -23488 8618 0 0 -30,416 WRIGHT 93 -8738 4906 -7987 1757 0 0 -10,062 County Total 16478 -2135115 1728474 -1091101 -204738 -8579 -528193 -2,239,252 CASS BACKUS 311 -18859 11475 -12722 14261 0 0 -5,844 BENA 110 -4768 3514 -1761 -682 0 0 -3,697 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 7 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit: Reduced Net Change County/ Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relier TIF in Prop. Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8=sUIn of'2-7) ------------------- --------- ___00-____- - - _.- - - - --- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Non-metro CASS BOY RIVER 38 -1441 644 -1356 894 0 0 -1,259 CASS LAKE 860 -80076 61315 -16160 -50563 0 -9456 -94,940 CHICKAMAW BEACH 148 -23699 8243 -15786 3633 0 0 -27,609 EAST GULL LAKE 978 -1027618 710920 -60408 37978 0 0 -339,129 FEDERAL DAM 101 -20124 9223 -3480 1176 0 0 -13,204 HACKENSACK 285 -92748 72314 -18181 14261 0 0 -24,354 LAKE SHORE 966 -879319 480781 -82624 66174 0 0 -414,989 LONGVILLE 180 -102605 62585 -16165 11816 0 0 -44,368 PILLAGER 420 -15682 22284 -21962 7835 0 -18118 -25,643 PINE RIVER 928 -106368 89365 -48226 -10031 -10875 -12147 -98,283 REMER 372 -34814 20564 -19366 3074 0 0 -30,542 WALKER 1069 -319343 241241 -71305 100782 0 -78161 -126,786 County Total 6766 -2727463 1794467 -389504 200608 -10875 -117882 -1,250,648 CHIPPEWA CLARA CITY 1393 -131995 84391 -93982 - 11 722 0 -21397 -174,706 MAYNARD 388 -26979 28205 -16554 -12691 0 -22538 -50,557 MILAN 326 -26670 17692 -14944 6802 0 0 -17,119 MONTEVIDEO 5346 -499836 399604 -344648 -89493 -19549 -26947 -580,869 WATSON 209 -6329 5071 -8207 3599 0 0 -5,867 County Total 7662 -691808 534962 -478335 -103505 -19549 -70883 -829,119 CHISAGO CENTER CITY 582 -107841 29441 -54849 10730 0 0 -122,519 CHISAGO CITY 2622 -411989 131318 -197392 88774 0 -105153 -494,442 HARRIS 1121 -113303 48164 - 100960 -15332 0 -12813 -194,244 LINDSTROM 3015 -472288 155995 -277059 139683 0 -13068 -466,736 NORTH BRANCH 8023 -1178385 \ 574861 -653310 96986 0 -37276 -1,197,124 RUSH CITY 2102 -138060 138796 -110698 -31121 0 -198802 -339,886 SHAFER 343 -47506 31422 -20530 3864 0 0 -32,750 STACY 1278 -138988 75734 -68750 -18378 0 0 -150,383 TAYLORS FALLS 951 -114777 52217 -79309 64002 0 -3446 -81,312 WYOMING 3048 -484798 267506 -249255 111957 0 -15 -354,605 County Total 23085 -3207935 1505455 -1812114 451165 0 -370572 -3,434,001 CLAY BARNESVILLE 2173 -69362 37581 -164347 -1300 0 -20568 -217,996 COMSTOCK 123 -7271 4925 -8073 542 0 0 -9,877 DILWORTH 3001 -295189 199910 -179402 -72541 0 -10215 -357,437 FELTON 216 -11609 6529 -10583 2756 0 0 -12,907 GEORGETOWN 125 -11067 8503 -5852 6877 0 0 -1,538 GLYNDON 1049 -48177 21788 -67072 -10800 0 -14661 -118,922 HAWLEY 1882 -182519 50952 -116250 -27742 0 -5033 -280,592 HITTERDAL 201 -14454 4490 -8263 2514 0 0 -15,713 MOORHEAD 32177 -2839183 1660473 -1916466 -2175898 -254149 -560681 -6,085,904 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 8 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change County / Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief' TIF in Prop.Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8=sum of2-7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Non-metro CLAY SABIN 421 -17946 8593 -31439 19968 0 0 -20,824 ULEN 532 -36204 10375 -20727 14798 0 0 -31,759 County Total 41900 -3532980 2014119 -2528475 -2240826 -254149 -611158 -7,153,469 CLEARWATER BAGLEY 1235 -116890 71948 -53457 -71802 0 0 -170,201 CLEARBROOK 551 -27906 15585 -21811 -25987 0 0 -60,119 GONVICK 294 -11661 8770 -12265 5610 0 0 -9,546 LEONARD 29 -2216 1668 -1848 -245 0 0 -2,642 SHEVLIN 160 -12144 8562 -6788 -1 744 0 0 -12,114 County Total 2269 -170817 106533 -96169 -94168 0 0 -254,621 COOK GRAND MARAIS 1353 -254117 188967 -108163 81785 0 0 -91,529 County Total 1353 -254117 188967 -108163 81785 0 0 -91,529 COTTONWOOD BINGHAM LAKE 167 -22184 14424 -6137 973 0 0 -12,923 JEFFERS 396 -18577 13848 -13908 -2041 0 0 -20,679 MOUNTAIN LAKE 2082 -88178 53385 -95501 -35725 0 -13670 -179,689 STORDEN 274 -12342 9503 -9110 10314 0 0 - 1 ,635 WESTBROOK 755 -23169 15997 -33710 4064 0 0 -36,817 WINDOM 4490 -481414 267482 -311505 68997 0 -106215 -562,656 County Total 8164 -645864 374639 -469871 46582 0 -119886 -814,399 CROW WING BAXTER 5555 -2295073 1916755 -477507 201486 0 -77676 -732,014 BRAINERD 13178 -1607941 1165105 -617551 -837998 -70871 -96763 -2,066,019 BREEZY POINT 979 -601775 433697 -108293 116311 0 -65927 -225,987 CROSBY 2299 -188064 118411 -129674 -122317 0 -12657 -334,301 CROSSLAKE 1893 -2069731 1411923 -178048 153872 0 -28333 -710,316 CUYUNA 231 -30384 11494 -15607 8265 0 0 -26,232 DEERWOOD 590 -125873 88185 -35873 39661 0 -16982 -50,882 EMILY 847 -304759 158234 -83386 83838 0 -665 -146,737 FIFTY LAKES 392 -290156 165223 -45492 31519 0 0 -138,906 FORT RIPLEY 74 -7597 5334 -6741 1263 0 0 -7,741 GARRISON 213 -66822 65096 -8519 4782 0 -15125 -20,588 IRONTON 498 -31782 20751 -35719 18805 0 -7223 -35,168 JENKINS 287 -45166 56691 -20800 6235 0 -22677 -25,718 MANHATTAN BEACH 50 -48009 43060 -5956 1505 0 .-17866 -27,266 NISSWA 1953 -1156409 793667 -149137 68828 0 -103554 -546,605 PEQUOT LAKES 947 -188724 157892 -55282 31030 0 -18630 -73,714 RIVERTON 115 -21299 16725 -82!F 5233 0 0 -7,639 TROMMALD 125 -5388 1512 -6498 2635 0 0 -7.739 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 9 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Redu~ed Net Change County/ Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief TIF in Prop.Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8~sum of2-7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----..---- ----------- ----------- Non-metro CROW WING County Total 30226 -9084951 6629755 -1988381 -185047 -70871 -484077 -5,183,572 DODGE CLAREMONT 620 -30806 41689 -36607 1199 0 -56257 -80,782 DODGE CENTER 2226 -269287 260889 -152489 -112892 0 -190966 -464,745 HAYFIELD 1325 -69916 53520 -95206 43896 0 -15404 -83,110 KASSON 4398 -309830 143347 -341805 80286 0 -53851 -481,853 MANTORVILLE 1054 -94672 20134 -90646 25362 0 -1526 -141,349 WEST CONCORD 836 -37289 10700 -67303 -13437 0 0 -107,330 County Total 10459 -811800 530280 -784057 24414 0 -318004 -1,359,167 DOUGLAS ALEXANDRIA 8820 -2189295 1738088 -497835 91935 0 -161492 -1,018,599 BRANDON 450 -19954 20353 -31403 -3708 0 -9788 -44,500 CARLOS 329 -36703 27021 -25644 -1238 0 0 -36,564 EVANSVILLE 566 -29136 18203 -32806 -5009 0 0 -48,748 FORADA 197 -35048 17415 -16887 5010 0 0 -29,510 GARFIELD 281 -25776 16038 -19767 -2304 0 0 -31,809 KENSINGTON 286 -25224 18236 -12595 351 0 0 -19,232 :LLERVILLE 115 -3821 1977 -7502 -118 0 0 -9,464 JILTONA 279 -30807 19957 -23074 16441 0 0 -17,482 NELSON 172 -11896 6783 -11358 -3241 0 0 -19,712 OSAKIS 1567 -147109 79299 -106801 -23704 0 -45958 -'244,273 County Total 13062 -2554768 1963369 -785671 74415 0 -217238 -1,519,893 FARIBAULT BLUE EARTH 3621 -324703 268861 -230993 -1328 0 -132012 -420,175 BRICELYN 379 -28522 21916 -13008 -371 0 0 -19,986 DELAVAN 223 -15992 10387 -9667 12785 0 0 -2,487 EASTON 214 -20276 14674 -9837 12369 0 0 -3,070 ELMORE 735 -43884 31585 -27428 5571 0 0 -34,156 FROST 251 -9295 6463 -7330 9006 0 -3361 -4,517 KIESTER 540 -23796 15456 -25809 7005 0 -3851 -30,996 MINNESOTA LAKE 681 -44133 14121 -50877 45446 0 0 -35,442 WALTERS 88 -1806 941 -2565 3023 0 0 -407 WELLS 2494 -149918 108041 -147432 -27124 0 -46649 -263,082 WINNEBAGO 1487 -99652 87875 -73031 -31516 0 -51378 -167,702 County Total 10713 -761977 580320 -597978 34866 0 -237251 -982,019 FILLMORE CANTON 343 -19665 7911 -19415 -1135 0 0 -32,303 CHATFIELD 2394 -234656 144594 -198638 -42841 0 -59235 -390,776 FOU1'.'TAIN 343 -40681 41686 -25387 23870 0 -23943 -24,455 HARMONY 1080 -72968 54189 -84368 2279 0 -46656 -147,523 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 10 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap, 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change County/ Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief TIF in Prop.Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8=sum of2-7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Non-metro FILLMORE LANESBORO 788 -101448 57450 -67703 12781 0 -2958 -101,879 MABEL 766 -46183 14456 -54997 11087 0 -323 -75,960 OSTRANDER 212 -16553 8504 -15007 4562 0 0 -18,493 PETERSON 269 -11446 6099 -17263 -921 0 0 -23,531 PRESTON 1426 -125742 111157 -105743 -22084 0 -92000 -234,412 RUSHFORD CITY 1696 -128039 90413 -130013 -37879 0 -72057 -277,576 RUSHFORD VILLAGE 714 -52288 20603 -67549 36380 0 0 -62,854 SPRING VALLEY 2518 -225181 100011 -186422 36231 0 -21465 -296,826 WHALAN 64 -3061 595 -4951 -318 0 0 -7,735 WYKOFF 460 -33675 15226 -31114 2028 0 -5850 -53,385 County Total 13073 -1111586 672895 -1008571 24040 0 -324488 -1,747,710 FREEBORN ALBERT LEA 18356 -2235226 1474043 -1291593 -1109221 -20951 -258233 -3,441,180 ALDEN 652 -38423 19464 '::44548 17715 0 0 -45,792 CLARKS GROVE 734 -43420 24940 -41751 -379 0 0 -60,610 CONGER 133 -11233 8239 -8811 1755 0 0 -10,050 EMMONS 432 -21471 7204 -31558 -1183 0 0 -47,008 FREEBORN 305 -13128 9470 -16238 1664 0 0 -18,232 GENEVA 449 -28424 9456 -38156 11490 0 0 -45,635 GLENVILLE 720 -39977 15395 -49067 -11206 0 0 -84,855 HARTLAND 288 -19772 11150 -16312 2468 0 0 -22,466 HAYWARD 249 -23863 14944 -20588 7309 ,0 0 -22 , 197 HOLLANDALE 292 -21709 12757 -21107 6594 0 0 -23,465 MANCHESTER 81 -6860 5702 -1926 -304 0 0 -3,388 MYRTLE 63 -8751 7470 -2239 -1356 0 0 -4,877 TWIN LAKES 168 -14457 11195 -5699 9790 0 0 829 County Total 22922 -2526715 1631428 -1589593 -1064864 -20951 -258233 -3,828.927 GOODHUE BELLECHESTER 172 -6933 5376 -13528 2191 0 0 -12,894 CANNON FALLS 3795 -686307 504665 -281019 129220 0 -204017 -537.458 DENNISON 168 -22408 9656 -14939 2419 0 0 -25,272 GOODHUE 778 -39654 43891 -62528 9010 0 -45991 -95,272 KENYON 1661 -184202 85345 -140848 13306 0 -47441 -273,839 PINE ISLAND 2337 -292802 206867 -171754 47181 0 -117167 -327,676 RED WING 16116 -7114009 2689820 -1201689 522552 -54427 -419684 -5,577,437 WANAMINGO 1007 -92511 39940 -79109 6336 0 -14881 -140,226 ZUMBROTA 2789 -416938 228636 -220021 56209 0 -92399 -444,513 County Total 28823 -8855764 3814196 -2185436 788424 -54427 -941579 -7,434.586 GRANT ASHBY 472 -29128 23512 -27620 -2604 0 -1101 -36,942 BARRETT 355 -27848 18708 -17646 154 0 -9060 -35,691 ELBOW LAKE 1275 -90029 58738 -73286 -58953 0 -7396 -170,925 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 11 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change County / Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief TIF in Prop. Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8=sum of'Z-7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Non-metro GRANT HERMAN 452 -29303 23819 -20851 3545 0 0 -22,790 HOFFMAN 672 -42726 27567 -40756 -6918 0 -4895 -67.727 NORCROSS 59 -6648 4256 -2330 1686 0 0 -3,037 WENDELL 177 -13562 9837 -7030 -1345 0 0 -12,099 County Total 3462 -239245 166438 -189518 -64435 0 -22452 -349,212 HOUSTON BROWNSVILLE 517 -48492 9741 -42333 10729 0 0 -70,355 CALEDONIA 2965 -302737 180794 -216417 -26551 0 -46040 -410,951 EITZEN 229 -19810 10826 -19554 26162 0 0 -2,376 HOKAR 614 -30324 14258 -45417 4839 0 0 -56,643 HOUSTON 1020 -94268 40942 -68755 -35300 0 -9093 -166,473 LACRESCENT 4923 -490326 200715 -392658 199760 -30646 -32474 -545,629 SPRING GROVE 1304 -96752 40426 -100297 -22302 0 -448 -179,373 County Total 11572 -1082709 497702 -885430 157337 -30646 -88054 -1 , 431 , 800 HUBBARD AKELEY 412 -28980 19182 -20657 - 7279 0 0 -37,735 LAPORTE 145 -10390 7397 -5694 559 0 0 -8,128 EVIS 364 -40950 22546 024167 3816 0 0 -38,754 ,ARK RAPIDS 3276 -589750 526618 -179120 -72624 0 -224607 -539,483 County Total 4197 -670070 575742 -229638 -75528 0 -2.24607 -.624,101 I SANTI BRAHAM 1276 -115676 53056 -79524 -44435 0 -27022 -213,601 CAMBRIDGE 5520 -1273189 892148 -344255 134860 0 -220124 -810,559 ISANTI 2324 -264855 135808 -189850 -93726 0 -18127 -430,750 County Total 9120 -1653720 1081012 -613629 -3301 0 -265273 -1,454,911 ITASCA BIGFORK 469 -35573 28893 -19075 16 0 0 -25,739 BOVEY 662 -49667 14664 -31816 13214 0 0 -53,606 CALUMET 383 -27090 10933 -16841 22390 0 0 -10 , 608 COHASSET 2481 -3137332 838947 -177807 60802 0 -81316 -2,496,706 COLERAINE 1110 -130639 40685 -84595 43623 0 -12245 -143,171 DEER RIVER 903 -70730 47479 -38803 1417 0 0 -60,636 EFFIE 91 -3180 1602 -4882 0 0 0 -6,460 GRAND RAPIDS 7764 -1472359 1381276 -523792 169772 0 -317099 -762,201 KEEWA TIN 1164 1354 12672 -56452 -17016 0 0 -59,443 LA PRAIRIE 605 -111265 72191 -46461 28694 0 -26094 -82,935 MARBLE 695 -43162 12112 -33703 16362 0 0 -48,391 NASIIWAUK 935 -21543 56639 -51636 46184 0 -708 28,936 SQUAW LAKE 99 -7241 5640 -3587 -702 0 0 -5,890 TACONITE 315 -35938 17980 -15535 18202 0 0 -15,292 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 12 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit. Reduced Net Change County/ Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief TIF in Prop. Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8=sum of2-7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Non-metro ITASCA WARBA 183 -17034 14418 -10225 2366 0 0 -10,475 ZEMPLE 75 -19927 17248 -3753 1589 0 0 -4,843 County Total 17934 -5181325 2573378 -1118962 406913 0 -437462 -3,757.459 JACKSON ALPHA 126 -4206 4242 -3734 1507 0 0 -2, 191 HERON LAKE 768 -56229 35890 - 31001 -20259 0 0 -71,599 JACKSON 3501 -121840 170360 -227185 4765 0 -106484 -280,385 LAKEFIELD 1721 -17312 46076 -107268 40197 0 -18801 -57.107 OKABENA 185 -4812 3747 -9729 9649 0 0 - 1 , 145 WILDER 69 -7436 4745 -2771 -1276 0 0 -6,738 County Total 6370 -211835 265060 -381688 34583 0 -125286 -419,165 KANABEC GRASS TON 105 -5805 2769 -7101 -59 0 0 -10,196 MORA 3193 -364568 234400 -186591 -80804 0 -63557 -461,120 OGILVIE 474 -32042 16040 -16754 739 0 -2355 -34,372 QUAMBA 98 -1945 547 -6279 -128 0 0 -7,805 County Total 3870 -404360 253756 -216726 -80252 0 -65912 -513,494 KANDIYOHI ATWATER CITY 1079 -103918 57083 -82192 8890 0 0 -120,137 BLOMKEST 186 -9405 5285 -13895 3964 0 0 -14,052 KANDIYOHI 555 -26460 10132 ~40332 -2800 0 0 -59,460 LAKE LILLIAN 257 -20219 13490 -16612 10947 0 0 -12,393 NEW LONDON 1066 -107685 65902 -78388 -23438 0 -53697 -197,307 PENNOCK 504 -20316 9224 -31118 5582 0 0 -36,628 PRINSBURG 458 -34729 29521 -40163 20003 0 0 -25,368 RAYMOND 803 -44392 19497 -49889 1508 0 0 -73,275 REGAL 40 -4173 2865 -3371 1534 0 0 -3,145 SPICER 1126 -223029 140060 -88443 76307 0 -128953 -224,058 SUNBURG 110 -7788 4631 -4357 -1655 0 0 -9,169 WILLMAR 18351 -2498938 1578137 -1146995 -932787 0 -190205 -3,190,788 County Total 24535 -3101052 1935827 -1595755 -831945 0 -372856 -3,965,781 KITTSON DONALDSON 41 -11031 10158 -808 1757 0 0 77 HALLOCK 1196 -69962 53305 -67451 -7031 0 -3949 -95,087 HALMA 78 -2269 1675 -1399 903 ~ 0 0 -1 ,090 HU1IBOLDT 61 -5362 5200 -1226 -550 0 0 -1,938 KARLSTAD 794 -47847 26407 -35259 -21770 0 0 -78,469 KENNEDY 255 -12821 10829 -10832 13956 0 0 1,131 LAKE BRONSON 246 -9027 6135 -6767 -292 0 0 -9,951 LANCASTER 363 -16221 6816 -15111 492 0 0 -24,024 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 13 9/07/01 ' (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change ',", Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change County/ Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief TIF in Prop.Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8=sum of2- 7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Non-me-cro KITTSON ST VINCENT 117 -2796 686 -3075 -530 0 0 -5,715 County Total 3151 -177336 121211 -141928 -13065 0 -3949 -215,066 KOOCHICHING BIG FALLS 264 -9714 5142 -9472 -11096 0 0 -25,140 INTLFALLS 6703 -1192883 978638 -391401 -157976 0 -12956 -776,577 LITTLEFORK 680 -24387 12609 -36306 -22086 0 0 -70,170 llIZPAH 78 -1520 655 -2452 275 0 0 -3,041 NORTHOME 230 -14088 8146 -8311 -2698 0 0 -16,951 RANIER 188 -16603 8734 -15793 -565 0 0 -24,227 County Total 8143 -1259194 1013924 -463734 -194146 0 -12956 -916,106 LAC QUI PARLE BELLINGHAM 205 -18501 15345 -6815 -470 0 0 -10,441 BOYD 210 -4925 5885 -4097 1042 0 0 -2,096 DAWSON 1539 -131781 102398 -86830 -28084 -12043 -2902 -]59,242 LOUISBURG 26 -6296 4990 -660 -43 0 0 -2,009 MADISON 1768 -82679 43215 -92745 -8182 0 -720 -141,112 MARIETTA 174 -5261 2872 -5000 4543 0 0 -2,846 ASSAU 83 -29798 26834 -1514 -821 0 0 -5,298 County Total 4005 -279242 201539 -197660 -32015 -12043 -3622 -323,043 LAKE BEAVER BAY 175 -38078 44740 -9390 ]4575 0 -22825 -10,978 SILVER BAY 2068 -44229 46331 -145650 -30349 0 0 -173,897 TWO HARBORS 3613 -179556 190664 -256736 -79533 0 -62451 -387,612 County Total 5856 -261863 281735 -411776 -95307 0 -85277 -572,488 LAKE OF WOODS BAUDETTE 1104 -169722 130132 -53529 9220 0 0 -83,899 WILLIAMS 210 -11116 7468 -8247 -3367 0 0 -15,262 County Total 1314 -180838 137600 -61777 5853 0 0 -99,161 LESUEUR CLEVELAND 673 -39215 10470 -58777 30607 0 0 -56,916 ELYSIAN 486 -76964 33705 -47880 51008 0 -37 -40, 168 HEIDELBERG 72 -10321 881 -12577 1508 0 0 -20,508 KASOTA 680 -37684 14703 -51878 -5108 0 0 -79,967 KILKENNY 148 -3504 2115 -8886 -536 0 0 -10,811 LE SUEUR 3919 -485586 307772 -288823 -21873 -38982 . -96430 -623,922 LECENTER 2240 -161319 108271 -160444 -13828 0 -48527 -275,848 MONTGOMERY 2794 -251692 180305 -220346 57313 0 -106727 -341,147 WATERVILLE 1833 -149073 62472 -143729 -23140 0 -7437 -260,907 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 14 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in Ci"Cy Transit Reduced Net Change County/ Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief TIF in Prop. Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8~sum of2-7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Non-metro LESUEUR County Total 12845 -1215358 720695 -993341 75951 -38982 -259158 -1,710,193 LINCOLN ARCO 100 -1246 1564 -2367 1485 0 0 -564 HENDRICKS 725 -35637 18520 -37481 -17200 0 0 -71,798 IVANHOE 679 -26801 15272 -34792 -14513 0 0 -60,835 LAKE BENTON 703 -29368 18073 -39307 15406 0 -1848 -37,044 TYLER 1218 -55694 33163 -66169 -13289 0 0 -10 1 ,990 County Total 3425 -148746 86592 -180117 -28111 0 -1848 -272,231 LYON BALATON 637 -23259 11003 -34233 -1048 0 0 -47,537 COTTONWOOD 1148 -143204 72326 -81843 -16268 0 -9052 -178,041 FLORENCE 61 -1842 1101 -1078 99 0 0 -1,719 GARVIN 159 -2093 3392 -2909 2742 0 0 1,133 GHENT 315 -15154 9476 -23011 142 0 0 -28,546 LYNn 346 -11683 3494 -16585 6354 0 0 -18,420 MARSHALL 12735 -1997663 1547617 -723741 -335572 0 -697370 -2,206,729 UINNEOTA 1449 -72110 42298 -95837 -37259 0 0 -162,908 RUSSELL 371 -14522 6539 -25482 8114 0 0 -25,351 TAUNTON 207 -7213 6442 -7845 -6334 0 0 -14,949 TRACY 2268 -86321 70038 -117558 -40994 'Q 0 -174,835 County Total 19696 -2375064 1773728 -1130121 -420024 0 -706422 -2,857,903 MCLEOD BISCAY 114 -2981 105 -9759 3048 0 0 -9,587 BROWNTON 807 -28288 9833 -58356 15086 0 0 -61,725 GLENCOE 5453 -468932 343678 -405642 39521 0 -197023 -688,398 HUTCHINSON 13080 -2513205 1566962 -944083 283349 0 -346888 -1,953,865 LESTER PRAIRIE 1377 -87725 43330 -106989 18161 0 -12532 -145,756 PLATO 336 -30391 25628 -32556 35769 0 -9583 -11,133 SILVER LAKE 761 -72604 17890 -71047 44228 0 0 -81,532 STEWART 564 -27403 20277 -44992 34642 0 0 -17,476 WINSTED 2094 -237757 123491 -163034 -41154 0 -45182 -363,636 County Total 24586 -3469285 2151194 -1836458 432650 0 -611209 -3,333,107 MAHNOMEN BEJOU 94 -3008 2725 -2129 -143 0 0 -2,554 MAHNOMEN 1202 -140268 144571 -70140 -27189 0 -8552 -101,578 WAUBUN 403 -11345 11257 -21419 1283 0 -4935 -25,159 County Total 1699 -154620 158553 -93688 -26049 0 -13487 -129,291 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 15 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change Countyl Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief TIF in Prop.Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8=sum of2-7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Non-metro MARSHALL ALVARADO 371 -18745 9330 -18381 -2555 0 0 -30,350 ARGYLE 656 -37698 27051 -30082 3433 0 -3478 -40,774 GRYGLA 228 -15261 9751 -8778 -3096 0 0 -17,383 HOLT 89 -1934 809 -3198 -736 0 0 -5,060 MIDDLE RIVER 319 -15308 10430 -11 647 -14185 0 0 -30,710 NE\\'FOLDEN 362 -14563 9482 -13898 83 0 0 -18,896 OSLO 347 -23981 19005 -19056 7854 0 0 -16,179 STEPHEN 708 -33933 19430 -34813 -23823 0 0 -73,139 STRANDQUIST 88 -3446 2743 -1965 -1159 0 0 -3,827 VIKING 92 -2141 1064 -3743 562 0 0 -4,258 WARREN 1678 -74665 40542 -83085 -27983 0 -3625 - 148,817 County Total 4938 -241675 149638 -228646 -61605 0 -7104 -389,393 MARTIN CEYLON 413 -2861 3772 -11478 4288 0 0 -6,279 DUNNELL 197 -8690 8017 -5968 -4331 0 0 -10,971 FAIRMONT 10889 -798433 836831 -761377 -588743 0 -273642 -1,585,364 GRANADA 317 -9571 4309 -12453 16 0 0 -17,698 NORTIIROP 262 -5280 6674 -14564 3217 0 0 -9,953 SHERBURN 1082 -49987 23869 -64986 26401 0 0 -64,704 RIMONT 754 -42059 26002 -42664 16292 0 0 -42,429 RUMAN 1259 -67504 37515 -69678 912 0 -4~84 -103,139 WELCOME 721 -43478 39614 -40055 -19307 .0 -22836 -86,062 County Total 15894 - 1027862 986604 -1023224 -561255 0 -300862 -1,926,599 MEEKER CEDAR MILLS 53 -5467 3812 -5497 -439 0 0 -7,592 COSMOS 582 -39186 20234 -37320 9131 0 -4807 -51,949 DARWIN 276 -24364 10857 -20366 4137 0 0 -29,736 DASSEL 1233 -121468 68094 -86198 22574 0 0 -116,998 EDEN VALLEY 866 -54230 40996 -53925 -9033 0 -5492 -81,682 GROVE CITY 608 -29754 11509 -33236 4260 0 0 -47,221 KINGSTON 120 -3781 1064 -9193 -1168 0 0 -13,078 LITCHFIELD 6562 -540242 345222 -464083 -18177 0 -78860 -756,140 WATKINS 880 -40622 31432 -47371 17195 0 -6667 -46,033 County Total 11180 -859113 533219 -757190 28480 0 -95826 -1,150,430 MILLE LACS BOCK 106 -4316 3458 -5319 -1259 0 0 -7,436 FORESTON 389 -35945 26656 -27604 -6898 0 0 -43,791 ISLE 707 -120297 79760 -50768 37152 0 -15868 -70,021 MILACA 2580 -211575 153823 -154909 -64082 0 . -18177 -294,920 ONAMIA 847 -50741 53025 -34696 -26813 0 -44044 -103,268 PEASE 163 -10657 7989 -10665 -2124 0 0 -15,457 PRINCETON 3933 -650602 483071 -293248 33380 0 -111001 -538,400 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 16 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change County/ Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief TIF in Prop.Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8=sUID of2-7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Non-metro MILLE LACS WAHKON 314 -42465 24445 -20731 10638 0 0 -28,113 County To"Cal 9039 -1126598 832227 -597940 -20006 0 -189090 -1 , 10 1 .407 MORRISON BOWLUS 260 -17376 6345 -20773 -1837 0 0 -33,640 BUCKMAN 208 -16859 9623 -16282 5243 0 0 -18,276 ELMDALE 107 -10162 4036 -1O~3l 4050 0 0 -13,007 FLENSBURG 244 -8226 2799 -20067 1998 0 0 -23,495 GENOLA 71 -31962 27377 -4804 901 0 0 -8,489 HARDING 105 -8045 5602 -7545 558 0 0 -9,431 HILLMAN 29 -674 518 -210 1 -602 0 0 -2,860 LASTRUP 99 -18695 14751 -8973 2772 0 0 -10,145 LITTLE FALLS 7719 -707135 578890 -479041 -283499 0 -304074 -1,194,858 MOTLEY 585 -69515 91074 -25380 -3555 0 -35283 -42 , 660 PIERZ 1277 -102786 59991 -88591 -34558 0 -34474 -200,418 RANDALL 535 -27645 18261 -35992 -2754 0 0 -48,130 ROYALTON 816 -111750 62625 -61898 -9603 0 -24356 -144,982 SOBIESKI 196 -6615 2408 -17446 3200 0 0 -18,452 SWANVILLE 351 -36816 24437 -18789 -8941 0 0 -40,109 UPSALA 424 -45627 18702 -33620 3390 0 0 -57,154 County Total 13026 -1219887 927438 -852233 -323237 0 -398187 -1,866,105 MOWER ADAMS 800 -40480 20916 -56550 -15671 0 0 -91,784 AUSTIN 23314 -2347451 1412767 -1626169 -1022371 0 -273401 -3,856,624 BROWNSDALE 718 -11647 13409 -51590 2863 0 0 -46,964 DEXTER 333 -14114 10333 -19286 13783 0 -4619 -13,902 ELKTON 149 -7552 2545 -8969 5767 0 -213 -8,422 GRAND MEADOW 945 -67382 17968 -76660 3793 0 -7908 -130,189 LEROY 925 -40744 30713 -67391 -23853 0 -2843 -104,118 LYLE 566 -6573 8456 -34741 7587 0 -2008 -27,278 MAPLEVIEW 189 -5525 2777 -8334 1408 0 -1009 - 10 , 683 RACINE 355 -22175 10503 -32664 1509 0 -4208 -47,036 ROSE CREEK 354 -14743 7800 -28189 8287 0 -498 _27,342 SARGEANT 76 -5922 5777 -3660 1103 0 0 -2,703 TAOPI 93 -1945 700 -4096 221 0 0 -5. 119 WALTHAM 196 -1576 2175 -9828 2687 0 0 -6,542 County Total 29013 -2587828 1546841 -2028127 -1012887 0 -296706 -4.378,707 MURRAY AVOCA 146 -5258 3233 -5244 -2750 0 0 -10,019 CHANDLER 276 -31852 27028 -17802 -1793 0 0 -24,419 CURRIE 225 -7593 5522 -10443 -4753 0 0 -17,268 DOVRAY 67 -5138 6514 -2949 4 0 0 -1,569 FULDA 1283 -48640 22764 -74799 -8689 0 0 -109,364 House Research PROPERTY TAX C~GES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: tots avOS CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 17 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change County/ Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relier TIP in Prop. Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) C8=sum o:f2-7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Non-metro MURRAY HADLEY 81 -7164 6342 -3385 -2537 0 0 -6,744 IONA 173 -6865 4158 -7252 822 0 0 -9,137 LAKE WILSON 270 -11255 6759 -15081 10868 0 0 -8,709 SLATION 2072 -133459 79681 -142797 7544 0 -18408 -207,440 County Total 4593 -257225 162001 -279753 -1284 0 -18408 -394,669 NICOLLET COURTLAND 538 -45859 12977 -37735 15095 0 0 -55,522 LAFAYETTE 529 -22042 15493 -33541 2205 0 -7973 -45,858 NICOLLET 889 -63559 36779 -69112 5234 0 -12710 -103,367 NORTH MANKATO 11798 -2066546 1065484 -867538 -7303 0 -15694 -1.891.597 ST PETER 9747 -821937 424098 -521040 -89767 -26540 -160980 -1,196,166 County Total 23501 -3019943 1554832 -1528965 -74536 -26540 -197358 -3,292,510 NOBLES ADRIAN 1234 -45241 20701 -79659 -29322 0 -3776 -137.296 BIGELOW 231 -9183 8428 -10240 -4018 0 0 -15,013 BREWSTER 502 -49277 44828 -29226 -15654 0 0 -49,329 DUNDEE 102 -2480 1487 -3449 -2075 0 0 -6,517 ~LLSWORTIf 540 -9572 8652 -25883 -11316 0 0 -38,119 .,INBRAE 21 -3560 1635 -688 936 0 0 -1,676 LISMORE 238 -12216 7911 -10565 -821 0 0 -15.691 ROUND LAKE 424 -17882 41079 -21822 -2374 0 0 -999 RUSHMORE 376 -9450 7465 -20057 -5499 0 0 -27,540 WILMONT 332 - 10566 9125 -21011 -2454 0 0 -24,907 WORTIIINGTON 11283 -1119910 1099281 -629360 -364775 0 -463331 -1,478,095 County Total 15283 -1289339 1250592 -851958 -437372 0 -467106 -1.795,182 NORMAN ADA 1657 -82904 44089 -101637 -45358 0 -215 -186,024 BORUP 91 -3263 1675 -3071 -515 0 0 -5,175 GARY 215 -7570 5625 -7698 -1444 0 0 -11,087 HALSTAD 622 -26413 20297 -31271 -688 0 -9152 -47,228 HENDRUM 315 -8571 5320 -13209 -8116 0 0 -24.575 PERLEY 121 -5659 4763 -5426 -2679 0 0 -9,000 SHELLY 266 -7716 5498 -8156 -686 0 0 -11.060 TWIN VALLEY 865 -30050 16293 -35200 9267 0 0 -39,690 County Total 4152 -172147 103561 - 205667 -50219 0 -9367 -333,839 OLMSTED BYRON 3500 -294334 121302 -279734 144056 0 -9200 -317,911 DOVER 438 -22843 8153 -34433 991 0 0 -48,132 EyoTA 1644 -75447 25637 -138148 -13095 0 0 -201,053 ORONOeO 883 -92604 13680 -79137 20376 0 0 -137,686 House Research PROPERTY TAX. CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER O~fNIBUS TAX BILL page 18 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change County/ Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief TIF in Prop. Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8=sUID of2-7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Non-metro OLMSTED ROCHESTER 85806 -18490775 10685971 -6465386 698165 -301696 -1774812 -15,648,532 STEWARlVILLE 5411 -430803 202992 -367963 -51328 -13940 -171225 -832,267 County Total 97682 -19406806 11057734 -7364801 799165 -315636 -1955238 -17, 185 , 582 OTTERTAIL BATTLE LAKE 686 -106239 60977 -58825 36530 0 -2095 -69,653 BLUFFTON 210 -10482 6625 -13626 -3924 0 0 -21,407 CLITHERALL 118 _3958 2516 -4101 130 0 0 -5,413 DALTON 258 -15225 9431 -15331 -914 0 0 -22,039 DEER CREEK 328 -8837 8547 -17642 1479 0 0 -16,453 DENT 192 -12519 8160 -11093 -2798 0 0 -18,250 ELIZABETH 172 -6653 3751 -8851 -1831 0 0 -13,583 ERHARD 150 -6901 5598 -9823 -1035 0 0 -12,161 FERGUS FALLS 13471 -1983141 1389102 -882573 -785441 0 -443060 -2,705,113 HENNING 719 -58831 33800 -43480 -8208 0 -18831 -95,549 NEW YORKMILLS 1158 -11 0240 85342 -56673 -13029 0 -26284 -120,884 OTIERTAIL 451 -159246 92618 -37448 20563 0 0 -83,513 PARKERS PRAIRIE 991 -62952 41332 -64369 -16583 0 -3834 -106 . 406 PELICAN RAPIDS 2374 -180887 231203 -105693 -105758 -2916 -218193 -382,243 PERHAM 2559 -437061 384028 -152375 -49083 0 -138432 -392,923 RICHVILLE 124 -5506 3362 - 5892 379 0 0 -7,657 UNDERWOOD 319 -30661 17979 -19358 -3626 0 0 -35,667 URBANK 59 -2561 2032 -4876 464 '0 0 -4,940 VERGAS 311 -37681 17191 -20169 723 0 -7489 -47,425 VINING 68 -7767 4957 -4907 -26 0 0 -7,743 County Total 24718 -3247348 2408552 -1537105 -931988 -2916 -858218 -4,169,023 PENNINGTON GOODRIDGE 98 -2690 1634 -1999 -158 0 0 -3,213 ST HILAIRE 272 -24910 15369 -11011 9559 0 0 -10 , 994 THIEF RIVER FALLS 8410 -819689 410523 -459815 -104942 0 -2309 -976,232 County Total 8780 -847289 427526 -472826 -95541 0 -2309 -990,439 PINE ASKOV 368 -35196 13680 -22581 -6247 0 0 -50,344 BROOK PARK 156 -10841 6688 -7715 -382 0 0 -12,249 BRUNO 102 -9614 4817 -4504 -1270 0 0 -10,570 DENHAM 40 -17532 11038 _3238 340 0 0 -9,391 FINLAYSON 314 -35179 20432 -22019 1550 0 0 -35,216 HENRIETTE 101 -3541 1707 -4380 -875 0 0 -7,089 HINCKLEY 1291 -388927 369640 -77426 843 0 -127239 -223,109 KERRICK 71 - 7430 3965 -4044 -408 0 0 -7,917 PINE CITY 3043 -524153 341323 -187385 -28076 0 -37046 -435,338 ROCK CREEK 1119 -149463 65877 -101986 -5634 0 0 -191,205 RUTLEDGE 196 -17719 5729 -12015 3600 0 0 -20,405 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run; totsav05 EREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 19 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change County/ Population Takeovers Prop, Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief TIF in Prop. Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8=5um of2-7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Non-metro PINE SANDSTONE 1549 -107242 90431 -64890 -136995 0 -2374 -221,070 STURGEON LAKE 347 -55917 22265 -21308 3729 0 0 -51,231 WILLOW RIVER 309 -44768 18438 -19025 136 0 0 -45,218 County Total 9006 -1407522 976031 -552515 -169689 0 -166658 -1,320,353 PIPESTONE EDGERTON 1033 -88639 65856 -88275 -582 0 -8399 -120,040 HATFIELD 47 -5990 2240 -3068 867 0 0 -5.951 HOLLAND 215 -16726 10110 -9400 843 0 0 -15,172 IHLEN 107 -4264 1896 -4664 -1198 0 0 -8,229 JASPER 597 -44460 26879 -28300 -13070 0 0 -58,951 PIPESTONE 4280 -443402 289896 -252515 -179232 0 -132590 -717,844 RUTHTON 284 -12431 24256 -10224 -2262 0 0 -661 TROSKY 116 -4774 1529 -6284 -1802 0 0 -11.331 WOODSTOCK 132 -4689 2232 -6002 -1940 0 0 -10,399 County Total 6811 -625376 424895 -408732 -198376 0 -140990 -948.579 POLK BELTRAMI 101 -9896 7660 -4326 -1276 0 0 -7,838 rLIMAX 243 -12684 7509 -9035 8704 0 0 -5,507 ,ROOKSTON 8192 -396739 449069 -389734 -170754 0 -255216 -763,374 EAST GRAND FORKS 7501 -668489 529157 -490387 -115346 -53606 -127496 -926.167 ERSKINE 437 -43195 25406 -15234 -4529 0 0 ,-37,552 FERTILE 893 -33961 18636 -47827 421 0 0 -62.732 FISHER 435 -20444 8761 -28098 -2848 0 -727 -43,356 FOSSTON 1575 -85780 77713 -83087 13199 -3074 -76547 -157.577 GULLY 106 -6605 4313 -1689 -453 0 0 -4,434 LENGBY 79 -2620 1222 -2659 3148 0 0 -909 MCINTOSH 638 -33267 13241 -23925 -2159 0 0 -46,110 MENTOR 150 -12830 7188 -5325 -2593 0 0 -13,560 NIELSVILLE 91 -2047 467 -2188 3913 0 0 146 TRAIL 62 -15283 15850 -978 217 0 0 -193 WINGER 205 -20314 12395 -7628 10911 0 0 -4,635 County Total 20708 -1364154 1178587 -1112119 -259445 -56680 -459986 -2,073,797 POPE CYRUS 303 -14607 6989 -16690 -2720 0 0 -27.028 FARWELL 57 -2317 1340 -2081 341 0 0 -2,717 GLENWOOD 2594 -261801 154759 -157574 20152 0 . -38380 -282,843 LONG BEACH 271 -48100 16879 -25326 955 0 0 -55,592 LOWRY 271 -17641 10148 - 18911 4935 0 0 -21,470 SEDAN 65 -6762 5210 -2383 -839 0 0 -4,774 STARBUCK 1314 -103939 55081 -87196 -47649 0 -12188 -195,891 VILLARD 244 -16746 9863 -13542 5074 0 0 -15,352 WESTPORT 72 -2790 1409 -2322 301 0 0 -3,402 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 20 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ, levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change County/ Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief' TIF in Prop. Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8=,sum of'2 - 7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------_..- ----------- ----------- Non-metro POPE County Total 5191 -474702 261677 -326026 -19450 0 -50568 -609,069 RED LAKE BROOKS 141 -10086 10134 - 501 5 -2638 0 -6254 -13,859 OKLEE 396 -24060 16663 -13467 -1084 0 0 -21,948 PLUMMER 270 -27766 25634 -11008 14576 0 0 1,436 RED LAKEFALLS ]590 -85453 34855 -70265 -3765 0 -1678] -141,409 County Total 2397 -147366 87287 -99756 7089 0 -23035 -175,781 REDWOOD BELVIEW 412 15 5726 -16019 3003 0 0 -7,276 CLEMENTS 191 -7569 6569 -7401 3996 0 0 -4,405 DELHI 69 -3773 4033 -2376 199 0 0 -],9]7 LAMBERTON 859 -87996 67596 -42521 -3146 0 0 -66,067 LUCAN 226 -7998 4575 -11682 7307 0 0 -7,797 MILROY 271 -9444 5078 -]5740 16080 0 0 -4,027 MORGAN 903 -55629 33942 -56250 30286 0 -2663 -50,314 REDWOOD FALLS 5459 -391528 310129 -382678 70411 0 -65614 -459,280 REVERE 100 -5046 3826 -2432 1170 0 0 -2,482 SANBORN 434 -34507 26638 -16129 -1156 0 0 -25,154 SEAFORTH 77 -2419 85Q -3048 183 0 0 -4,434 VESTA 339 -10906 8]59 -13583 2207 0 0 -14,122 WABASSO 643 -40513 29692 -41872 -10356 0 - 9480 ' -72,529 WALNUT GROVE 599 -41307 30778 -29063 -893 0 0 -40,484 WANDA 103 -5200 4487 -3689 75] 0 0 -3,651 County Total 10685 -703818 542077 -644482 120042 0 -77757 -763,938 RENVILLE BIRD ISLAND 1195 -77274 59877 -79791 -14723 0 -35972 -147,885 BUFFALO LAKE 768 -75145 68347 -45905 22994 0 -29484 -59,193 DANUBE 529 -28170 15014 -3399] 23246 0 0 -23,901 FAIRFAX 1295 -74244 33755 -81011 -7441 0 0 -128,941 FRANKLIN 498 -20279 6699 -19484 4990 0 0 -28,075 HECTOR 1166 -79664 62071 -81984 25472 0 -1623 -75,729 MORTON 442 -12320 22224 -19441 -73 0 -2888 -12,498 OLIVIA 2570 -199269 173394 -167651 -113356 0 -145720 -452,602 RENVILLE 1323 -77303 73016 -736]3 558 0 -156390 -233,732 SACRED HEART 549 -28705 16167 -23709 -12600 0 -1494 -50,341 County Total 10335 -672375 530563 -626580 -'70933 0 -373571 -1,212,897 RICE DUNDAS 547 -100413 86391 -62065 14926 0 -72419 -133,580 FARIBAULT 20818 -2339904 1213839 -1373688 -1492396 -34300 -678947 -4,705,396 LONSDALE 1491 -125140 48400 -145320 28146 0 0 -193,914 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 21 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change County/ Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief' TIF in Prop.Tax City (0 (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8:sum of'2-7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Non-metro RICE MORRISTOWN 981 -51011 14248 -65361 4100 0 0 -98,024 NERSTRAND 233 -28924 13395 -24765 11538 0 0 -28,756 NORTHFIELD 17147 -2822668 1182939 -826247 -543661 -40195 -224397 -3,274,229 County Total 41217 -5468059 2559212 -2497447 -1977347 -74495 -975763 -8,433,899 ROCK BEA \fER CREEK 250 -18713 11586 -13429 3913 0 0 -16,644 HARDWICK 222 -6439 2963 -10053 -1238 0 0 -14,767 HILLS 565 -30556 17427 -40780 2639 0 -1290 -52,560 KENNETH 61 -3442 2027 -2906 315 0 0 -4,007 LUVERNE 4617 -319689 265762 -338782 -77132 0 -177781 -647,622 MAGNOLIA 221 -19227 14398 -9858 -1006 0 0 -15,693 STEEN 182 -5903 1629 -10881 -195 0 0 -15,351 County Total 6118 -403970 315790 -426689 -72704 0 -179070 -766,644 ROSEALL BADGER 470 -55491 11651 -23482 -4796 0 0 -72,118 GREENBUSH 784 -43864 24897 -46425 -12056 0 0 -77,448 ROOSEVELT 166 -6643 2295 -10690 -989 0 0 -16,027 OSEAU 2756 -411818 261957 -166432 - 31293 0 -46711 -394,297 ,TRATHCONA 29 -1480 838 -1622 -206 0 0 -2,469 WARROAD 1722 -304996 200334 -85036 -103 I 66 0 -66156 -359,020 County Total 5927 -824291 501972 -333687 -152506 0 -112867 -921,378 ST LOUIS AURORA 1850 -48266 49821 -121354 -3567 0 -5547 -128,914 BABBITT 1670 -112656 60520 -114947 -62244 0 0 -229,327 BrWABIK 954 -15995 33527 -54198 5701 0 -25355 -56,320 BROOKS TON 98 -6678 3042 -5565 -302 0 0 -9,503 BUHL 983 -20543 36118 -49448 12835 0 -14475 -35,512 CHISHOLM 4960 -231828 127262 -313034 -44947 0 -5233 -467,780 COOK 622 -61113 56465 -33942 -2103 0 -4924 -45,618 DULUTH 86918 -8496725 6434333 -5372180 -2528606 -1427832 -4780331 -16,171,340 ELY 3724 -269234 251045 -241420 -69675 0 -72934 -402,219 EVELETH 3865 -79535 148402 -206275 -57470 0 -40111 -234,989 FLOODWOOD 503 -29062 16800 -25448 19271 0 0 -18,439 GILBERT 1847 -62035 36153 -113810 -42304 0 0 -181,995 HERMANTOWN 7448 -1759485 1166743 -516140 461015 0 -97716 -745,583 HIBBING 17071 -727204 860236 -1141193 -918529 -23137 -113666 -2,063,493 HOYT LAKES 2082 -303233 117077 -137898 -10443 0 -1251 -335,746 IRON JUNCTION 93 -5313 5225 -7909 -701 0 0 -8,698 KINNEY 199 -2094 9057 -5789 16598 0 0 17,772 LEONIDAS 60 -959 1826 -3446 5970 0 0 3,391 MCKINLEY 80 -2172 715 -5585 12621 0 0 5,579 MEADOWLANDS 111 -6463 5290 -3990 5885 0 0 723 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 22 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap, 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change County / Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief TIF in Prop, Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8~sum of2-7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Non-metro ST LOUIS MT IRON 2999 -220341 314937 --215318 -4244 0 -132877 -257,844 ORR 249 -20289 17345 -17495 9695 0 -5641 -16,385 PROCTOR 2852 -216688 144048 -230363 -22011 0 - 72672 -397,686 TOWER 479 -37609 33991 -26064 22230 0 -3299 -10,751 VIRGINIA 9157 -667121 545933 -526443 162907 -3416 -229727 -717,867 IVINTON 185 -5568 2720 -8031 -1463 0 0 -12,342 County Total 151059 -13408209 10478635 -9497287 -3033881 -1454385 -5605760 -22,520,888 LESUEUR NEW PRAGUE 4559 -701831 280664 -344866 230104 0 -65448 -601,377 County Total 4559 -701831 280664 -344866 230104 0 -65448 -601,377 SHERBURNE BECKER 2673 -6846360 2324609 -188713 233743 0 -346064 -4,822,784 BIG LAKE 6063 -723905 283494 -538921 -10392 0 -123622 -1,113,345 CLEAR LAKE 266 -40486 26053 -25525 5417 0 0 -34,541 ELK RIVER 16447 -4939068 2199329 -1167832 -85556 0 -185378 -4, 178,505 ZIMMERMAN 2851 -366987 163575 -226552 60245 0 -56813 -426,532 County Total 28300 -12916806 4997061 -2147542 203457 0 -711877 -10,575,707 SIBLEY ARLINGTON 2048 -87460 49829 -134756 -24452 0 -24888 ~221,727 GAYLORD 2279 -120826 119305 -158831 8381 0 -11'8974 -270,944 GIBBON 808 -39031 20593 -55137 39185 0 -6239 -40,630 GREEN ISLE 334 -22410 15285 -26256 23082 0 0 -10 , 298 HENDERSON 910 -34351 27516 -66785 -18569 0 ~19416 -111,605 NEW AUBURN 488 -17355 3060 -22166 -9558 0 0 -46,019 WINTHROP 1367 -81200 67445 -104155 -13207 0 -66002 -197,119 County Total 8234 -402632 303033 -568086 4862 0 -235519 -898,342 STEARNS ALBANY 1796 -224579 140683 -131712 -61844 0 -127233 -404,686 AVON 1242 -175279 123580 -106957 8535 0 -139805 -289,926 BELGRADE 750 -65484 42173 -45090 -1l29 0 -2830 -72,359 BROOTEN 649 -42188 37466 -35106 -20323 0 -44123 -104,274 COLD SPRING 2975 -349685 221399 -230760 106124 0 -41340 -294,262 ELROSA 166 -17129 11625 -14578 7205 0 0 -12,876 FREEPORT 454 -36655 26253 -48805 38193 0 -5 -21,018 GREENWALD 201 -10321 8509 -19693 7637 0 0 -13,868 HOLDINGFORD 736 -51776 13519 -56665 23794 0 -2553 -73,681 KIMBALL 635 -99367 40354 -38155 7613 0 -3646 -93,201 LAKE HENRY 90 -3032 777 -6550 3841 0 0 -4,965 MEIRE GROVE 149 -4690 3716 -9473 6276 0 -4613 -8,784 MELROSE 3091 -285271 226638 -206654 - 64211 0 -29250 -358,749 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 23 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change ~ounty/ Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief' TIF in Prop.Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8=sum of'2-7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Non-metro STEARNS NEW MUNICH 352 -11719 7546 -22789 1499 0 0 -25,463 PAYNESVILLE 2267 -285913 206025 -170043 -58345 0 -65594 -373,870 PLEASANT LAKE 504 -62037 5566 -38188 10741 0 0 -83,918 RICHMOND 1213 -99648 59184 -112678 -4412 0 -19759 -177,313 ROCKVILLE 749 -60067 18593 -49166 -9561 0 0 -100.201 ROSCOE 116 -6563 3790 -6955 -263 0 0 -9,991 SARTELL 9641 -1912578 694856 -675723 287200 0 -52901 -1,659,146 SAUK CENTRE 3930 -284313 313384 -288057 -123155 0 -304389 -686,530 SPRING HILL 55 -1808 1019 -6367 2818 0 0 -4,337 ST ANTHONY 90 -3148 992 -5273 -50 0 0 -7,479 ST AUGUSTA 3065 -236172 63979 -224358 -18620 0 0 -415,171 ST CLOUD 59107 -10325862 7164367 -3413299 -2083211 -1008111 -1721494 -11,387,611 ST JOSEPH 4681 -362954 184186 -230405 -174065 0 -350 -583,588 ST MARTIN 278 -32870 24129 -23417 4978 0 -10923 -38,102 ST ROSA 44 -6784 6353 -7014 2362 0 0 -5,083 ST STEPHEN 860 -62989 15498 -80010 9906 0 0 -117,595 WAITE PARK 6568 -2094561 1895797 -323927 293839 0 -660413 -889,264 County Total 106454 -17215440 11561956 -6627868 -1796628 -1008111 -3231220 -18,317,311 STEELE BLOOMING PRAIRIE 1933 -122237 58246 -161129 -42352 0 -1519 -268,990 ,LEND ALE 590 -47537 24300 -50060 833 0 0 -72,465 .fEDFORD 984 -396434 139975 -92101 33070 0 -18641 -334,131 OWATONNA 22434 -3776467 2143743 -1746825 -599736 0 -245167 -4,224,453 County Total 25941 -4342675 2366263 -2050115 -608185 0 -265327 . -4,900,039 STEVENS ALBERTA 142 -17470 20020 -6106 2038 0 0 -1,519 CHOKIO 443 -23125 17544 -28813 -48 0 -1035 -35,476 DONNELLY 254 -10355 7618 -15981 738 0 0 -17,981 HANCOCK 717 -30373 17965 -35853 -14541 0 0 -62,803 MORRIS 5068 -363394 316017 -264403 -136376 -42400 -137925 -628,482 County Total 6624 -444719 379163 -351156 -148189 -42400 -138960 -746,260 SWIFT APPLETON 2871 -435594 381710 -71627 -128900 0 -26372 -280,783 BENSON 3376 -125166 112656 -212995 -51920 -28648 -140360 -446,434 CLONTARF 173 -7942 4810 -9347 2149 0 0 -10,330 DANVERS 108 -15089 13212 -6994 5195 0 0 -3,676 DE GRAFF 133 -6262 4023 -6684 -3724 0 0 -12,646 HOLLOWAY 112 -21954 18375 -3063 10 0 0 -6,632 KERKHOVEN 759 -56807 17509 -49248 -12929 0 0 -101,475 MURDOCK 303 -39457 29726 -13102 -5249 0 -7776 -35,859 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 25 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net ChaiJge Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change Countyl Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relier TIF in Prop. Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8=sum o:f2-7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---.------ ----------- ----------- Non-metro WADENA County Total 6927 -665994 545788 -392663 -210010 0 -243615 -966,493 WASECA JANESVILLE 2109 -128966 27216 -161321 1003 0 0 -262,068 NEW RICHLAND 1197 - 58500 27623 -89636 -6522 0 0 -127.036 WALDORF 242 -13063 4649 -16918 12979 0 -594 -12.947 WASECA 8493 -887984 524055 -638825 -71816 0 -24500 -1,099,070 County Total 12041 -1088513 583542 -906701 -64356 0 -25094 - 1 , 501 , 121 WATONWAN BUTTERFIELD 564 -26710 22402 -22435 -4287 0 -3694 -34.725 DARFVR 137 -5381 5561 -4833 2827 0 0 -1.826 LA SALLE 90 -8556 8114 -3736 -2711 0 0 -6,889 LEWISVILLE 274 -10363 7658 -10924 -3881 0 0 -17,510 MADELIA 2340 -166996 96373 -129302 -47005 0 -39406 -286.335 ODIN 125 -5584 3274 -6351 2273 0 0 -6.388 ORMSBY 154 -8532 6432 -8840 -985 0 0 -11.925 ST JAMES 4695 -326021 224329 -266026 -84687 0 0 -452.405 County Total 8379 -558143 374143 -452446 -138456 0 -43101 -818.003 WILKIN BRECKENRIDGE 3559 -156368 129128 -225792 -43744 0 -47040 -343,817 CAMPBELL 241 -10380 10934 -8792 -5061 0 0 -13.298 DORAN 59 -2145 1951 -1528 -1058 0 0 -2,780 FOXHOME 143 -3339 2829 -7021 -1353 0 0 -8.884 KENT 120 -4092 2698 -4101 612 0 0 -4,883 NASHUA 69 -11311 5212 -3279 1888 0 0 -7.489 ROTHSAY 497 -28654 15187 -23987 -3573 0 0 -41,027 TENNEY 6 -5710 6839 -33 152 0 0 1,249 WOLVERTON 122 -9797 9418 -5287 -1168 0 0 -6,833 County Total 4816 -231795 184198 -279819 -53305 0 -47040 -427,762 WINONA ALTURA 417 -36177 19618 -35334 18214 0 0 -33.678 DAKOTA 329 -13834 4462 -33359 8459 0 0 -34.272 ELBA 214 -6878 4332 -14496 -962 0 0 -18,003 GOODVIEW 3373 -477682 307920 -239027 201271 0 -40199 -247,718 LEWISTON 1484 -124627 71290 -105975 -30924 0 -31668 -221,904 MINNESOTA 235 -9712 5618 -17576 6631 0 0 -15,040 ROLLINGSTONE 697 -43042 21877 -58534 27593 0 0 -52,106 ST CHARLES 3295 -178036 84479 -227235 - 16170 0 -38090 -375,052 STOCKTON 682 -35780 21849 -40158 -17146 0 -3051 -74,285 UTICA 230 -11963 8876 -18641 7478 0 0 -14,250 WINONA 27069 -3478494 2376452 -1647173 -2241927 -49940 -607270 -5,648,352 House Research PROPERTY TAX CHANGES FROM AIDS AND County List Run: totsav05 CREDITS UNDER OMNIBUS TAX BILL page 26 9/07/01 (Based on Spec. Session Chap. 5) Net change Net Change Total 2000 Educ. levy New State New in City Transit Reduced Net Change County / Population Takeovers Prop. Tax Credits 2002 Aids Relief TIF in Prop. Tax City (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8=sum of2-7) ------------------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Non-metro WINONA County Total 38025 -4416224 2926774 -2437509 -2037483 -49940 -720278 -6,734,660 WRIGHT ALBERTVILLE 3621 -944699 616668 -293938 143743 0 -104595 -582,821 ANNANDALE 2684 -307387 173205 -159634 43220 -23950 -158853 -433,399 BUFFALO 10097 -1573381 864059 -639246 -246156 0 -661377 -2,256, 100 CLEARWATER 858 -191041 135648 -66734 -426 0 0 -122,554 CORATO 2727 -321845 223323 -167032 -42937 0 ~86103 -394,595 DELANO 3837 -765614 331111 -278126 65391 0 -158375 -805,613 HANOVER 1355 -335096 65802 -93242 47264 0 0 ,.315.272 HOWARD LAKE 1853 -205526 125922 -128130 -64370 0 -102190 -374,294 MAPLE LAKE 1633 -322120 138466 -127439 -14708 0 -49108 -374,909 MONTICELLO 7868 -4919674 1656740 -551582 308047 -23716 -465449 -3,995,634 MONTROSE 1143 -89441 40592 -66030 -9696 0 -12428 -137,003 OTSEGO 6389 -888170 231108 -482476 127535 0 0 -1,012,003 ROCKFORD 3484 -627056 148239 -186568 72570 -2080 -89605 -684,501 SOUTH HAVEN 204 -12717 6474 -16284 -341 0 0 -22,868 ST MICHAEL 9099 -1717244 510617 -774210 218422 0 -100826 -1,863,241 WAVERLY 732 -121178 41251 -61694 53511 0 0 -88 , 110 County Total 57584 -13342189 5309225 -4092367 701069 -49746 -1988909 -13,462,917 YELLOW MEDICINE CANBY 1903 -102977 66208 -98776 -24281 0 -16920 -176,746 CLARKFIELD 944 -60789 36493 -49061 38866 0 0 -34,491 ECHO 278 -13510 9754 -10772 6996 0 0 -7,532 GRANITE FALLS 3070 -317229 181221 -202581 -116416 -10744 -86552 -552,301 HANLEY FALLS 323 -10927 7662 -8896 323 0 0 -11 ,838 HAZEL RUN 64 -3222 1113 -1867 0 0 0 -3,977 PORTER 190 -14979 9492 -10342 -3639 0 0 -19,468 ST LED 106 -3376 1126 -4430 1198 0 0 -5,481 woon LAKE 436 -23496 12409 -19562 -524 0 0 -31,172 County Total 7314 -550505 325478 -406287 -97477 -10744 -103471 -843,006 Region Total 1388628 -197485494 120708478 -90154063 -19250140 -3769407 -33088278 -223,038,904 State Total 3930051 -902734990 525038869 -250927376 60816785 -86912175 -145184361 - 799,903,249 (T" ....._~~ ,(.(. -: (' 1 OC~ L.;: ~J,-J.-l.A,L:;itea ~J I November 19, 2001 Ms. Jodie Woodrow Gassen Companies 4501 Minnetonka Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55416 Dear Ms. Woodrow: 1880 55038 429..3232 '3 ~Ta;( (651) 429-8629 In response to your letter dated October 24, 2001, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council reviewed your request for added lighting for the Eagle Pass cottages and townhomes. The Council has directed Staff to contact Excel Energy regarding the original lighting plan and what, if anything, can be done to enhance the light capability of the current streetlights. Staff is also investigating whether or not conduit exists in the event that additional streetlights are vvarranted. Because of the Than..~sgiving holiday being this week, Staff may not be able to obtain much in the way of information until next week. Once we have that information, we can advise you ofthe options that are available to the Association and the City. Until then, if you have any questions or concerns, please teel free to contact me at City Hall, 651-429-3232. Sincere ly, / <::-~~t;o~?5>yc___/ Ii Kim Moore'~Sykes City Administrator