The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2007-01-10 CC 'EstaEiisfietf 189 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Wednesday, January 10,2007 6:15 p.m. - Oath of Office & Attorney ITpdate Recent Incident at 7098 Centerville noad (S:lgers Bar & Grill ) 6:30 p.m. - Council ~leeting tervi{{e WORKSESSION I. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call II. OATH OF OFFICE 1. Mayor Mary Capra 2. Council Member Lee 3. Council Member Paar 4. Council Member Broussard (Previously Sworn In) ID. ATTORNEY UPDATE 1. 7098 Centerville Road (Sagers Bar & Grill) IV. ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL MEETING I. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call II. PUBLIC HEARINGS ID. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES 1. December 27, 2006 City Council Meeting Minutes (Page 1-8) V. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City ofCenterville December 28,2006 through January 10,2007 Claims (Page 9) Centennial Fire District Expenditures through January 2, 2007 (Page 10) TimeSaver OfT Site Secretarial- 2007 Contract (Page 11-12) Parks & Recreation Committee Recommendation for Council to Consider Allocating Funds From Park Dedication Fees, Not to Exceed $600, For Horse Drawn Hayride from Bunker Stables for a Community Event in 2007 (Page 13) Proposed Agreement Between City & MessageLabs - Junk Email Security Services -$720/Year (Page 14-15) 2. 3. 4. p VI. A W ARDSIPRESENTA TIONS/APPEARANCES Vll. OLD BUSINESS 1. Sedona Homes - Re-Plat Preliminary Plat & Conditional Use Permit Request - 7035 - 20th Avenue South (Cont'd From Previous Meeting) (Page 16-34) vm. NEW BUSINESS 1. Parks & Recreation Committee Recommendation for Council to Consider Allocating Funds From District Memorial Hospital Board Dissolution Settlement ($17,383.12) to the Purchase of Skate Park Equipment for Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park (Page 35) 2. Res. #07-001- To Self-Administrate an Employee Benefit Plan with AFLAC (Page 36-37) 4. Res. #07-002 - Adopting the Anoka County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (page 38-39) 5. Res. #07-003 - Appointments (Page 40-42) 6. Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendations: Hanzal Subdivision a. Res. #07-004 - Associated With Respective Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Page 43) b, Proposed Ord. #17 - Rezone From P-l (Public/Semi-Public, R-5 (Single Family Residential Estate) to R-2 (Single Family Residential) (Page 44-45) c. Preliminary Plat Approval IX. ANNOUNCEMENTSIUPDA TES 1. City Administrator, Mr. Dallas Larson 2. Center Mart's Failure of 2nd Tobacco Compliance Check for 2006 (Page 62- 63) 2. Downtown Redevelopment - Draft Development Agreement (.January It, 2no~'~. {,~3d p.,nL \\ H'~'_', S*\t~'.;..;iOi!) 3. Centerville Sesquicentennial a. LaCompany X. ADJOURNMENT ~'." R1-\ 1 !~\ DER\"* CLPD Police Commission - January 8, 2007 7 00 p.m ('I I'D OlTice:; Council Work Session - January 11,2007 - 6:30 pm Council Chambers Centennial Fire District Steering Committee - January 18, 2007 . ().OO pm City Council Meeting - January 24, 2007 ~ 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 27,2006 6:30 p.m. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on December 27,2006, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Mayor Mary Capra Council Member Tom Lee Council Member JeffPaar Council Member Richard Terway :O~Cil Member Michelle Lakso .......:>. ..... .i>.. it>:...... o e N......... ....',...........'.. 0....0..,...,... '."" .. ..... ... .. .- ... .uo. ..... 'U ..... .... ... 'U .... ..-" ......... .. .._." H.... ... .." HH ~e.........d.o.. .. ...0......... ..... .'. .. .. -" .. . ...... .... ... ... ... .... .... .. ,":':'; <,:: .::;- -::,: ./i: ::,: :::,: ,..... .. .. ......... .. ". '....0'..:,..:......,.'.....' ..... .'.'.. ,.............................. p......o"........ ... . ...... .... .... ..... .... .. ...... . ,"dO" .. .... .. ... . . ..-- .. ....... ... .. ... . .... .'" .. .. ", ..... . ....,... ;.. -;",";"," ..,- -;- .,.. ......- .,...... .... ..' ...... -.. . .," "" ....... .... ... ....... " .. ," ".- ,'" ...... ..... ", ..... -.. .. .... .... .... ...... ..,.... ... -, ":" .. ..... ... .... . ..... ... .. ",. ",.. ". .... "," .... .... ...", "," .. ". An.....,......~..., P..'......'........,.. .....".,0...,..., ...,. .,.....,. .... .... ...0.......... . ;!t. ,")\ @i....:IV ii"iL:)i/ ~.u~ "<; ':-:-:-:-:-> :::::::::::-::. :::: .':',.:'.mm..:. .,...... ,_." -:,:-. :-.... ..... .'. :-:- .':' ::::: :::: ':' ':'.' ABSENT: STAFF: City Engineer Mark Statz City Administrator Dallas Larson City Attorney Kurt Glaser I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Capra called the December 27, 2006, City Council meeting to order at 6:34 p.m. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Capra indicated added under the consent agenda item 1, page 21(a); under item 6, "Approval of Massage Therapist License & Sauna(s) or Massage Parlor(s) License - Ms. Lisa Kieselhorst (Subject to Successful Criminal Background Check); under awards add recognition of Council Member Terway; under new business, add item 10, Resolution 06- 05X "Operating Transfers of Funds"; add item 11, "Facility Use Agreement/Metropolitan Transit and the City of Centerville"; under announcements move the Centennial Police Department Update from AnnouncementslUpdates to A wards/Presentations/Appearances. Motion by Council Member Terway. seconded bv Council Member Lakso to approve the a2:enda as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. IV. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES 1. December 7, 2006 City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes I City of CenterviJle Meeting Minutes December 27, 2006 Motion by Council Member Paar. seconded by Council Member Lee to approve the December 7. 2006 City Council Work Session Meetin2 Minutes as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 2. December 13,2006 City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes Motion by Council Member Lee. seconded by Council Member Paar to approve the December 13. 2006 City Council Work Session Meetin2 Minutes as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 3. December 13,2006 City Council Meeting Minutes Mayor Capra made the following changes: Page 11 of 19, 5th paragraph to read: "Mr. Keleher agreed to allow this matter to be continued..." Page 12 of 19, the last motion on the page add at the end: "Motion carried unanimously". Page 14 of 19, first sentence change Shodeed to "Schlavin". Motion by Council Member Lakso. seconded by Council Member Paar to approve the December 13. 2006 City Council Meetin2 Minutes with the stated amendments. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. V. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City ofCenterville December 14, 2006 through December 27,2006 Claims 2. Centennial Fire District Expenditures through December 13, 2006 3. Centennial Lakes Police Department Expenditures 11/10-12/14/06 4. Centerville Lion's Request for Temporary Gambling Permit (Raffle) & Special Even Permit for Ice Fishing Contest - Saturday, February 17,2007 5. Successful Performance Review - City Clerk, Ms. Teresa Bender 6. Approval of Massage Therapist License & Sauna(s) or Massage Pador(s) License - Ms. Lisa Kieselhorst Motion by Council Member Lee. seconded by Council Member Terway to approve the Consent A2enda. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. VI. A W ARDSIPRESENT ATIONS/APPEARANCES 1. Recognition of Council Member Terway Mayor Capra recognized Council Member Terway's contribution to the Council. 2. Centennial Lakes Police Department Update (Sergeant Pat Aldrich) Mayor Capra thanked the Minnesota State Police, Washington and Anoka County Sheriffs department, the Lino Lakes, Blaine, Spring Lake Park, and Fridley Police Page 2 of8 ~ City of Centerville Meeting Minutes December 27, 2006 Department, and the Criminal Investigation Division of Anoka County for their assistance recently. Sergeant Pat Aldrich briefly updated the Council on the activities of the Centennial Lakes Police Department pertinent to Centerville. VII. OLD BUSINESS 1. Joint Powers Agreement City Attorney Glaser stated since their last meeting, the County agreed to concessions on the streetscape plans. He noted they have not agreed to change the ponding, but he believed the City would not have to pay the full amount of ponding costs or there was a possibility of not paying any cost, which he would talk about to the Council privately. He stated in total they were about $500,000 from where they started. He recommended that the Council pass the agreement in its current form. He did not believe that the City would receive any additional concessions. Mayor Capra stated she would like to make this contingent upon receiving the agreement in writing. City Attorney Glaser stated he would clarify the language in item 4b with the County. Council Member Paar stated he was going to vote against this agreement because there was $500,000 that should not be there. He noted he was for the road and they needed the road, but when he ran for re-election he wanted to make sure the City paid for what they should and he believed they were paying $500,000 too much, which he believed was the County's error. He stated he would support the road and this was strictly a moral issue for him. He indicated he was displeased with how this was handled by the County. Council Member Lee stated he agreed with Council Member Paar that they were paying too much money. He stated he would not provide a "no" vote on this issue. He believed the County would receive Council Member Paar's message, but they needed to do the road even though he did not agree with the costs. Council Member T erway stated they needed this to happen in order to make the downtown happen. He agreed with Council Member Paar with respect to the costs, but he believed staff had reduced those costs as much as possible. He noted this road would benefit the City for many years to come. He stated he supported the project and would vote for it. Council Member Lakso noted if the road was not redone, it would deteriorate. She believed the costs were done as fairly as they could have been. She stated she would in favor of the project. Page 3 of8 .3 City of Centerville Meeting Minutes December 27, 2006 Mayor Capra stated she would also vote in favor of the project, but she still had concerns regarding the stormwater management. She commended staff for all of their work on this agreement. She noted the road was unsafe and something needed to be done. She asked if Council wanted to make this contingent upon a signed agreement. Engineer Statz stated he believed the City and County could work this out and that it would be in their best interest to not attach any riders on the agreement. He noted this made too much sense to not be worked out. Mayor Capra asked if they could approve the lP A with the understanding it was contingent upon the signed agreement. Motion bv Council Member Terwav. seconded bv Council Member Lakso. to approve the Joint Powers A~reement. for the reconstruction of County State Aid Hi~hwav No. 14 (Main Street) from I35W to I35E County Proiect No. 02-614-24 with clarification bv the City's attorney of the interpretation of the lan~ua~e of 4B and with the understandin~ the County will a2ree to reasonable concessions for the two blocks south of Main Street on Centerville Road with re2ard to their streetscape policies. All in favor. Motion carried 4-1 (Council Member Paar opposed). VIII. NEW BUSINESS 1. Precision Excavating Closeout & Final Payment - $132384.50 Administrator Larson stated this was the final payment. Motion bv Council Member Lee. seconded by Council Member Terwav. to approve the Precision Excavatin~ Closeout and Final Pavment in the amount of $132.384.50. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Labor Agreement (January, 2007 - December 31, 2009) Administrator Larson stated they had reached an agreement with the Local 49 Union workers (Public Works). He reviewed the modifications to the Agreement with Council. Motion by Council Member Lee. seconded by Council Member Paar. to approve the Labor A~reement between the City of Centerville and International Union of Operatin~ En2ineers Local No. 49 AFL-CIO. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. 3. North Anoka Meals on Wheels Request for Letter of Support Mayor Capra noted North Anoka Meals on Wheels was requesting a letter of support. Page 4 of8 4 City of Centerville Meeting Minutes December 27,2006 Motion by Council Member Paar, seconded by Council Member Terway, to direct Administrator Larson to submit a Letter of Support as requested by the North Anoka Meals on Wheels. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Press Publications Request to be Appointed/Designated as the City's Legal Paper Motion by Council Member Terway, seconded by Council Member Paar, to desi2Date the Quad Communitv Press as the official newspaper for 2007. All in favor. Motion carried 4-1 (Councilmember Paar opposed). Council Member Paar stated it would be nice if the paper would report more positive articles about the City of Centerville. He noted he was not happy with the paper. 5. Anoka County Integrated Waste Management Agreement for Residential Recycling Program 2007 & Recommended Language Modification Mayor Capra stated they were requesting under item 7, page 3, reimbursement for purchasing and utilizing recycled products (i.e. playground equipment, safety zone material, picnic tables, etc.) while educating citizens in public areas. Administrator Larson noted this agreement is with all of the cities and if they attempted to revise the language, he did not believe it would go very far. City Attorney Glaser recommended they not approve this until the County also made some conceSSIOns. Mayor Capra recommended Administrator Larson send a letter to the other participating municipalities regarding the proposed language change. It was the consensus of the Council to table consideration of the Anoka County Integrated Waste Management Agreement for the Residential Recycling Program 2007. Motion by Council Member Terway, seconded by Council Member Parr, to direct staff to contact the 21 participatin2 municipalities ofthe Anoka County Solid Waste Advisory Committee with re2ard to the proposed lan2ua2e they want in'serted into the A2reement re2ardin2 the Score Funds. All in Favor. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Council Member Terway, seconded by Council Member Paar, to direct staff to send a letter to Ms. Smith reQUestin2 the task force meet bi-monthly or Quarterly. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Council Packet contained a letter requesting bi-monthlv meetings and same was forwarded to Ms. Smith prior to the meetinf!. 6. Policies a. Sidewalk/Trail Inspection Page 5 of8 5' City of Centerville Meeting Minutes December 27, 2006 b. Pothole Repair c. Snowplowing d. Street Sweeping Council Member Terway stated he felt that plowing should not be determined by the amount of snowfall.. He stated they needed to ere on the side of being cautious rather than the amount of snowfall. Council Member Paar believed that the Public Works Director should be making the snowplowing decisions. Administrator Larson noted anyone at Public Works could make the decision, but they needed to be empowered to make that decision. Administrator Larson suggested that the policy needs to be clear and that cost consideration could be a much larger issue if the City received frequent snow falls. He noted this item could be continued to the next meeting if necessary. Council Member Lee recommended that the residents be reminded it was their responsibility to clear the snow from sidewalks in front of their residences. Motion by Council Member Paar. seconded by Council Member Lee. to adopt the Centerville Snowplowin2: Policy as amended. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 7. District Memorial Hospital Board Dissolution Motion by Council Member Terway. seconded by Council Member Paar. to accept the Final Order of the Governin2: Board of Memorial Hospital District in Forest Lake and accept the check to the City of Centerville representin2: the City of Centerville's portion of the remainin2: funds ordered to be distributed pursuant to the Final Order. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 8. Resolution #06-059 - Appointment Committee/Commission Guidelines Motion by Council Member Lakso. seconded by Council Member Paar. to adopt Resolution #06-059. a Resolution Establishin2: Guidelines for Appointments to Committee or Commissions. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 9. Council Appointments Council Member Lee recommended this be continued to the next Council meeting. Mayor Capra requested the City Clerk draft the list of Council appointments for consideration at the next meeting. Council Member Lakso stated she would be willing to serve on the Fire Steering Committee. Page 6 of8 h City of Centerville Meeting Minutes December 27,2006 Council Member Paar stated he liked being on the Parks and Recreation Committee, but the meetings were not convenient for his schedule. He asked if someone wanted to take these meetings. Council Member Lakso stated she would be willing to attend the Parks & Recreation Committee meetings. Council Member Paar stated he would then serve on the Fire Steering Committee. Mayor Capra recommended they have alternates for the committees, including the Police Commission. Mayor Capra stated she would be the alternate for the Fire Steering Committee. Council Member Paar stated he would be the alternate for Cable Commission. Council Member Lee stated he would be on the Fire Steering Commission, the Police Commission, and the Acting Mayor. Mayor Capra stated she would serve on the Rush Line Corridor, Police Commission, and the alternate for the Fire Steering Committee. Motion by Council Member Lakso. seconded by Council Member Terway. to request the North Metro Cable Commission consider !wine: to quarterly meetine:s versus monthly meetine:s. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 10. Resolution #06-058 - Operating Transfers of Funds Motion by Council Member Lee. seconded by Council Member Terway. to adopt Resolution #06-058 - Operatine: Transfer of Funds. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 11. Facility Use Agreement (Church of St. Genevieve's/Met Transit/City) Motion by Council Member Terway. seconded by Council Member Paar. to approve the Facilities Use Ae:reement (Church of S1. Gen'sIMet Transit/City). All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. IX. ANNOUNCEMENTS/uPDA TES 1. City Administrator, Mr. Dallas Larson. Administrator Larson provided a written update and stated things were fairly quiet in the City with the Holidays. 2. CSAH14 (Update) Page 7 of8 1 City of Centerville Meeting Minutes December 27, 2006 3. Downtown Redevelopment - Draft Development Agreement Administrator Larson stated this was a draft of an Agreement and a workshop would be scheduled in the future to discuss this. Council agreed to add the discussion of this Agreement to the January 11, 2007, 6:30 p.m. Worksession agenda with this item starting at approximately 7:30 p.m. 4. Centerville Sesquicentennial a. LaCompany Mayor Capra stated LaCompany was interested in coming to the City for the Sesquicentennial. Mayor Capra stated that she would continue discussions with them and keep Council abreast of any issues that may arise. 5. Correspondence to Anoka County Integrated Waste Management This item was addressed in item 5 under New Business. 6. Centennial Lakes Police Department Update (Pat Aldrich) This item was moved up to A wards/Presentations/Appearances. x. ADJOURNMENT Motion bv Council Member Lee, seconded by Council Member Terway, to adiourn the December 27, 2006 City Council meetin2 at 8:43 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. Transcribed by: Kathy Altman, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Page 80f8 ! tervi{{e 'Lfta6Hs/ied. CITY OF CENTERVILLE 01/05/071:36 PM Page 1 *Check Summary Register@ Name 10100 MAIN STREET BANK Paid Chk# 022004 ASSURANT EMPLOYEE Paid Chk# 022005 BOYER TRUCKS Paid Chk# 022006 CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS Paid Chk# 022007 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Paid Chk# 022008 CONNEXUS ENERGY Paid Chk# 022009 H & L MESABI Paid Chk# 022010 HUGO FEED MILL Paid Chk# 022011 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF Paid Chk# 022012 LARSON, DALLAS Paid Chk# 022013 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Paid Chk# 022014 MMUA Paid Chk# 022015 NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE Paid Chk# 022016 NGUYEN, JOESPH CHU LAN Paid Chk# 022017 PRESS PUBLICATIONS Paid Chk# 022018 TIME SAVER Paid Chk# 022019 US BANK CORPORATE TRUST Paid Chk# 022020 XCEL ENERGY Check Date JANUARY 2007 Check Amt 1/10/2007 1/10/2007 1/10/2007 1/10/2007 1/10/2007 1/10/2007 1/10/2007 1/10/2007 1/10/2007 1/10/2007 1/10/2007 1/10/2007 1/10/2007 1/10/2007 1/10/2007 1/10/2007 1/10/2007 Total Checks $121.50 JANUARY 2007 - SHORT TERM DISA $58,490.00 2007 STERLING L8500 -SER. # 2F $149.30 SAFETY GLASSES - ULTRA BRIGHT $1,563.85 7087 20TH AVE S - SERV THRU 12 $504.29 STREET LIGHTS - 395653-219699 $10.22 SALES TAX DUE ON INV. 69816 $21.07 SHOVEL HANDLES $90.00 JAN 07 UNION DUES - T. PETERSO $436.00 REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXP - 2006 F $1,534.50 DECEMBER 2006 SAC FEES $244.00 2007 - 01-01 THRU 12-31 WATER $32.00 LIFE INS. - T BENDER & J. MEYE $5.53 OVER PYMT ON FINAL UTILITY BIL $212.72 SUMMARY ORD. #16 -12/28 QUAD $290.88 12-13-06 CITY COUNCIL MEETING $330,977.50 #33462000 - GEN OBLG. IMPR. BO $1.59 1745 MAIN ST & 7098 CENTERVILL $394,684.95 Please remember that there will be an updated list of disbursements for approval on 1-10-07. 9 Centennial Fire District Check Register 1/212007 The disbursements listed below are submitted by the Centennial Fire District for your approval: DATE 1212812006 12/28/2006 12/28/2006 12128/2006 12/28/2006 1212812006 12/2812006 12/2812006 1212812006 12/28/2006 12/28/2006 12128/2006 12/28/2006 1212812006 CHECK# NAME 15430 15431 15432 15433 15434 15435 15436 15437 15438 15439 15440 15441 15442 15443 Anoka County Central Communications Armor Security, Inc. Batteries Plus Centennial Utilites City of Uno Lakes Connexus Energy Emergency Apparatus Maintenance Metrocall North Metro Television Office Depot Rainville-Carlson, Inc. Sentry Systems, Inc. Susan Booth Xcel Energy Total ACCOUNT 42205 - 800 MHz User Fees 42110 - Other Maintenance 42000 - Vehicle Maintenance 42551 - Station 1 - Gas 41000 - City of Uno Lakes 42252 - Station 1 - Electric 42110 - Other Maintenance 42240 - Telephone Expense 42180 - OffICe Supplies 42180 - Office Supplies 42110 - Other Maintenance 42110 - Other Maintenance 42110 - Other Maintenance 42254 - Station 2 - Electric 1 of 1 AMOUNT 670.35 154.84 250.35 465.54 18,332.76 340.31 196.55 86.82 52.98 110.09 110.90 70.93 186.00 504.25 21,532.67 JIJ Off Site Secretorio/ December 4, 2006 RECE\VED JAN 0 3 2007 Ms. Teresa Bender City Clerk City ofCenterville ' 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 CENTERVILLE, MN Dear Teresa, Enclosed is an Addendum to the Recording Secretary Service Agreement. The Agreement reflects an increase of three percent for year 2007 and extends the expiration ,date to December 31,2007. We appreciate the confidence you have placed in TimeS aver to handle your meeting minute needs and look forward to continuing that ~elationship in 2007. If you need further information or have questions, please feel free to contact me at '763-421-8999. Best regards, ~~ Carla Wirth Owner EnClosure: Recording Secretary Service Agreement Return envelope 1/ 28601 Hub Drive. Madil'Oll Lake. MN 56063 . 763-421-8999 . Feu 507-931-1668 ADDENDUM TO RECORDING SECRETARY SERVICE AGREEMENT Dated: December 31,2006 By and between TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. and the City of Centerville, 1880 Main Street, Centerville, MN 55038. 1. EXTENSION OF RECORDING SECRETARIAL SERVICE AGREEMENT: The term ofthe existing Recording Secretary Service Agreement dated December 31, 2005 shall be extended under the same terms and conditions to December 31, 2007. 2. TOSS Charges. TOSS shall be paid for its services as recording secretary for each meeting (the highest rate will prevail), as follows: a. Base Rate of One Hundred Nineteen and 00/100 dollars ($119.00) for any meeting up to one (1) hour (billable time) plus Twenty-nine and 35/100 dollars ($29.35) for each thirty (30) minutes following the first one (1) hours; or b. Twenty-six and 00/1 00 dollars ($26.00) per hour for length of meeting, and fifteen (15) minutes prior to Call to Order and fifteen (15) minutes following Adjournment with a one and one-half (1.5) hour minimum; and Eleven and 60/100 dollars ($11.60) for each page of minutes prepared from shorthand or machine notes of the recording secretary as draft minutes for submission to and the review and comment of the City of Centerville for their preparation of final minutes. At the end of the term of this Addendum or any extension of it, the parties may make a new Agreement or extend or modify the terms of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Addendum to the Recording Secretary Service Agreement as of the day and year indicated. January _, 2007 CITY OF CENTERVILLE By Dallas Larson Its City Administrator December 4, 2006 TIMESA vlt OFF SITE SE~RETARIAL, INC. By ItJ",;Jki!d:L Carla Wirth Its President & CEO IZ MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Kim Stephan DATE: January 4, 2007 SUBJECT: Request for Funding for Horse Drawn Hayride The Parks & Recreation Committee would like to sponsor two winter events, one at the Schwan's Super Rink and one at Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park The Skate Night at Schwan's would be held on Saturday, February 24,2007 from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. As per the City's agreement with Schwan's Super Rink, the City is allocated one hour of free ice time per year to offer an event to the community. The City also has 48 coupons good for any open skating time. The original plan was to schedule the one hour of free time and then hand out the coupons to anyone who wanted to continue skating for an additional hour. Committee Member Amundsen spoke with Mr. Pete Carlson to schedule the ice time and Mr. Carlson offered the City both hours for no charge. The committee will still need to determine what to do with the 48 coupons. It has been suggested to offer a summer event or possibly hand out the coupons to those who attend the February 24th event. Over the past years, the Economic Development Committee, together with the Parks & Recreation Committee has sponsored a Skate Night, Horse Drawn Hayride & Bonfire event in conjunction with Frozen Fete des Lacs. EDC has disbanded and there is no longer a Frozen Fete des Lacs, but because the hayride has been well attended by the community the Parks & Recreation Committee would like to see it continued. It will not be promoted as a Skate Night since the last few years there has not been ice to skate on. If there is ice this year that will be an additional feature of the event. A date has not been selected at this time; it depends on the availability of Bunker Stables, but the committee is looking at a Friday in February. The cost has been approximately $560 for the Horse Drawn Hayride in the previous years. Motion was made by Committee Member Amundsen, seconded by Committee Member Selander, to request City Council approve the expenditure from Park Dedication Fees not to exceed $600 to rent a Horse Drawn Hayride from Bunker Stables for a community event in 2007, with the date to be determined at a later time. All in favor. Motion passed unanimously. 10f1 13 ~ MessaqeLabs' MessageLabs Customer Agreement THIS CUSTOMER AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made the 3'd day of January 2007 (the "Effective Date") BETWEEN: (1) MessageLabs, Inc. a Delaware corporation located at 512 Seventh Avenue, Sixth Floor, New York, NY 10018, ("MessageLabs") and (2) City of Centerville whose postal address is at 1880 Main Street, Centerville, MN 55038 (the "Customer"). WHEREAS: (i) The Customer wishes, under the terms of this Agreement, to purchase the MessageLabs Service as detailed in Section B below (the "Service"); and (ii) MessageLabs wishes to provide the Service to the Customer. A. DURATION This Agreement shall be effective on the Effective Date and, subject to Section 10.1 of the attached Terms and Conditions continue for a period of twenty-four (24) months (the "Minimum Period") from the date the Service is made available to the Customer. After expiration of the Minimum Period, this Agreement wil/ automatically renew for additional twelve (12) month periods (each a "Renewal Term") until either party provides written notice of termination. Such notifICation must be provided at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of the Minimum Period or any current Renewal Term. For the purposes of this Agreement, "Term" means the Minimum Period and al/ Renewal Terms. B. SERVICE AND CHARGES Messagelabs will invoice the Customer annually in advance. Charges and payments for the Service win be calculated with reference to the tables below and in accordance with Section 4 of the attached Terms and Conditions. The Service(s) ordered shall be provided by MessageLabs in accordance with the specific Service terms and service levels at: www.messaQelabs.com/downloads/downloads.asDx which together with these terms and conditions shall be deemed the "Agreement". Administration Charges Domain Set Up Fee $80 IP Set Up Fee $200 Select Number Total Administration Charge for the Service $280 Service Selection Service Number of Users Service Number of UsersfMembers Email AV 10 Web AV AS v2.0 10 EmaillC 10 Web URL v2.0 10 Email AS 10 Bounda~Enc~ption Band fA, B, C or D] I Number Email CC 10 ElM Instant Messaging Number ArChiving Service Selection Number of Archiving Appliances to be sent to the Customer 0 Total Setup Charge for the Service (Minimum Set Up Charge $3,999.00) $0 Total Number Of Users for (minimum blocks of 25) 0 Per User Storage Quota (based on 2-year storage at 0.5GB minimum) GB Number of Redundant Archiving Appliances to be sent to the Customer 0 Cost of redundant appliances ($3,999.00 per appliance) $0 Classification: Confidential Owner: Messagelabs legal Department Page10f6 ,~I .""S.l.., ""~- C."_ V8.01 /oe;t ~ Messagelabs' Charges Service Charge Per Userl Member Per Charge Per Annum Month Anti Virus $Bundle $Bundle Anti Spam $Bundle $Bundle Content Control $Bundle $Bundle Image Control $Bundle $Bundle Web Anti Virus $Bundle $Bundle Web URL Filtering $Bundle $Bundle Select $Insert $Insert Select $Insert $Insert Total Service Charges $6 $720 C. TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Customer agrees to enter into this Agreement upon the terms and conditions set out herein and in the course of the Customer's business and not as a consumer. AS WITNESS the hands of the duly authorized representative of the parties hereto as of the Effective Date, Signed for and on behalf of: Messagelabs, Inc. City of Centerville By By Authorized signature Authorized signature Name (type or print) Name (type or print) Title Title On On Date ML Sales Reference: Date /~ Classification: Confidential Owner: Messagelabs legal Department Page 2 of 6 Messagelabs CUstomer Contract V8.01 060727 intersection, alley, driveway or street for safe vehicular, bicycle or pedestrian movement. (E) Swimming pool fencing. No private swimming pool with a water depth exceeding 24 inches may be allowed, unless enclosed by a permanent wall or fence not less than four feet in height with self-closing door and self-closing latch. (Ord. 80, passed 5-11-2005) ~~ 154.111 THROUGH 154.119 RESERVED FOR FUTURE EXPANSION. ~ 154.120 HEIGHT. (A) Structures. No structures or building may be erected to a height exceeding 35 feet without the issuance of a conditional use permit. (B) Excess height on a building. Upon the securing of a conditional use permit any building may be erected to a height exceeding that specified for the respective district, providedthe front, rear and side yards shall be increased one foot for each one foot by which the building exceeds the height limit established for that district. (C) Additional yard setback shall not be required for a structure that is any of the following: television and radio towers, church spires, belfries, monuments, tanks, water and fire towers, stage towers and scenery lofts, cooling towers, ornamental towers and spires, chimneys, elevator bulkheads, smokestacks, conveyors, flagpoles, silos, and air conditioning and heating units; and that no tower, gable, spire or similar structure shall be used for sleeping or eating quarters, or for any commercial purpose except one incidental to the permitted uses ofthe main building. ~~ 154.121 THROUGH 154.129 RESERVED FOR FUTURE EXPANSION. ~ 154.130 YARDS. (A) General requirements. The minimum depths of front yard, rear yard and side yard for each district shall be as defined in the schedule of regulations and conform to the following additional regulations: (1) All structures, whether attached to the principal structure or not, and whether open or enclosed, including porches, carports, balconies or platforms above normal grade level shall not project into any minimum front, side or rear yard; (2) Lots which abut on more than one street shall provide the required front yards along each street for the principal structure. Side yard setbacks for an accessory structure will apply to the frontage that is not considered to be the required front yard; I~ STAlE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEARING REQUEST FOR CONDmON;\L USE PERMIT, RE-PLAT & PRELIMINARY PLAT SEDONA TOWNHOMES, lLe., 7035 - 20TH A VENUE SOUTH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Centerville will be holding a public hearing to consider Sedona Townhomes, LLC's request for a condition8l use permit (to exceed City Code requirement not to exceed 35' in height by T and 11', on most of the proposed building and entrance respectively). To also consider the re-platting of the parcel from townhome-like office buildings previously passed by Council and consider the proposed construction of one (I), three (3) story, 29,760 square foot Commercial building instead. The meeting will be held on Tuesday, December 5, 2006 commencing at 6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter in Council Chambers at City Hal~ 1880 Main Street All persons interested are invited to attend and to be heard verbally or in writing. You may contact the City Clerk's office at (651) 429-3232 or by facsimile (651) 429-8629 if you need additional information. If you desire, you' may e-mail: dlarson~centervillemn.com or tbender@centervillenin.com with questions or . concerns. This notice is available on the City's web site: www.centervillemn.com. City Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assisted devices or a sign language 'interpreter must be received before 4:00 p.m., December 1,2006. November 15, 2006 Teresa Bender City Clerk Published in the Quad Community Press on November 21, 2006 /1 OUTIDT B 8 9 .IVnJrer .. =--UlL, ])J'l'c1i 1\'0. ";:1 = ~ .~ ~ o ... PAIRVlEW STREET ..., -< o .." - , - z o t"' > ~ :>:l :n - .... ~ ~ :ll ~ 8 ~ > -< ~ .... u, tIl Ii PRINTER'S AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ,STAT1=< np.~,m..n.TT"'~~-' . CITY OF CENTERVILLE " . . . . "NoTICE OF PUBLMI~t:~~; & PRELlMINARYPLAT. ST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PER . E SOUTH. " . " REQUE SEOONA TOWNHOMES, ~LC.; 7035,,.... ~OTH AVE~U of Centervi1le will be holding a public hear: .' . ." .EN \h t\he Planning and Zoning CommiSSion ~f the ty d C"ty Code requirement nof to exceed 35 ,Ignated agent, bemg duly sworn, on NonCE IS HEREBY GIV , a C's re uest for a conditional use permit (to excee I " nsider the re-platting of the parcel ". . Ing to considerSedona Townhom~si~\ropoioo building and entrance. respectivelY). To a1~:nslructiOn of one (1), three (3) story, e publIsher's deSIgnated agent and an in height by 7' and 11', on m?S~ 0 . usl assed by Council and conSider the propose 5 2006 commencing at 6:30 p.m, from town home-like office bUI!dlng~l~r:'~st:a~. The meeting will be held on Tuesday, December '". . he Quad Community Press, and that I 29,760 square foot ~mmercl~1 bu ~rs at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. . _ ntact the City Clerk's office at (651)" or shortly thereafter In Council c~a~~o attend and to be heard verbally or in wntlng. Yo~ m~y coyou may e-mail: dlarson@center- re stated below: All persons interested are Invl e 8629 if you need additional Information: If you eSlr~~ble on the City's'website: ~ 429-3232 or by facsimile (651) 4~~- CQmwithqueslionsorconcerns. Thlsnolice Isaval : all of the requirements constituting ~lIemn.com.ort!lender@ce~tefVemn.." """ ." ._": . einter reter must be received before 4:00 . . terVlllemn~m. ibl Requests for hearing assisted devices or a sign languag P ." ~ as prOVIded by Mmnesota Statute City Hall IS ADA acceSSle. "". . " . "" . : ; p.m;, December 1, 2006., .." . laws, and amended. Tere~a Bender, City .Clerk uad Community Press on November 21,2006. . . published one t.me In the a n llS) life printed CITY OF CF.NTERVILLE r.mm. TTSR PRRMT1', RR-PT,A1'& PRR. PT.AT-SEDONA TOWNHOMES which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week, for successive weeks; it was fIrst published on TUESDAY . the <1 day of N"OVliMRF.R . 20....QL and was thereafter printed and published on every to and including . the day of . 20~ and printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice: abcdefghijldmnopqrsruvwxyz BY: f~&~ TITLE: Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 21 day of NOVFMBRR .20.D.fL. ~~ jJ:)} ~"!~........:'~~-;,t..~.._~!.~,~.,:..~,o!ji.,.......~ ...... l' J ~ ~ -~~'tfT7., l:~ l. . e \i 1{""'~.~:::>', 'J" IV~ON L. HILL ~l '-:- ~, :--171. ~ ~{:~~~I rvOTARY PU!JLlC. MINNESOTA J ..f'\~f/ MY COMMISSION RATE INFORMATION t ;jt.;~'.. 5,!'P'RES.JAN.31.2011 ......................................................n...........................~~...~~::1::~:::::::I~~~:.::;.::~~~~... . . c, Minn. (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space. $ (Line, word or inch rate) (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter. $ (Line, word or inch rate) (3) Rate actually charged for the above matter. $ 7.15/INCH (Line, word or inch rate) /9 ';itervi{{e 'Estabfish eLf 1857 1880 'Main Street, CentervilIe, 'M:N 55038 651-429-3232 or <F~ 651-429-8629 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE State of Minnesota) County of Anoka ) City of Centerville) I, Teresa Bender, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: I am a United States citizen, over twenty-one (21) years of age, and the Account Clerk II of the City of Centerville, Minnesota. On November 21,2006, acting on behalf of the said city, I deposited in the U.S. Postal Service mailbox located at City Hall in the City of Centerville, 1880 Main Street, copies of the attached Public Hearing Notice for Sedona Homes Request for Contitional Use Permit, Re-Plat & Preliminary Plat, enclosed in envelopes, with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses appearing opposite their respective names: NAME ADDRESS See Attached There is delivery service by United States mail between the place of mailing and the places so addressed.~_____. ----------rz{ ~ (,_-.-----~/::.;......./ . m~--- -- Teresa Bender, City Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this 21st day of November, 2006. ~~~~ No Public KF' ~\^JEENEY "M"IESOTA "110 --~.. 2() 233122140004 CENTERVILLE CITY OF 233122140004 CURRENT OWNER 45761 233122140031 BEDNAR RYAN A & TAMMY L 233122140032 HATHAWAY ROBERT R & JEANETTE L 233122140033 NEUTKENS CHRISTlAAN T & PAMELA 233122140034 LANGE JESSE & SARAH 233122140035 LARSON LANA 233122140036 JANSEN KEITH R & LINDA M 233122140037 JORDAN TERRENCE L & ELISA E 233122140038 ULRICH JOSEPH C & TERRI L 233122140047 LUKE DAVID R & SUSAN M 233122140048 FULLER BRUCE A & SCHWARTZ LISA 233122140058 MUELLNER MICHAEL R 233122140059 SEOONA TOWN HOMES LLC 233122140065 JACKSON COMMER/CAL LLC 233122410044 KODLUBOY MICHAEL J & ANGELA M 233122410045 LENNOX JASON 233122410046 WOOD THOMAS P & MITSCH WOOD K 233122410052 LAKE AREA UTILITY CONTRACT 243122230007 SAIKO PROPERTIES 243122230007 243122230014 LGL LlC 243122320003 REHBEIN PROPERTIES 1880 MAIN ST CENTERVILLE MN 5~ 7087 20TH AVENU/CENTERV/LLE MN 5~ 7068 COTTONWO( CENTERVILLE MN 5~ 7060 COTTONWO( CENTERVILLE MN 5E 7054 COTTONWO( CENTERVILLE MN 5E 7048 COTTONWO( CENTERVILLE MN 5E 7044 COTTONWO( CENTERV/LLE MN 5~ 7041 COTTONWO( CENTERVILLE MN 5~ 7049 COTTONWO( CENTERVILLE MN 5~ 7055 COTTONWO( CENTERVILLE MN 5~ 7026 BRIAN CT CENTERVILLE MN 5~ 7020 BRIAN COUR' CENTERVILLE MN 5~ 7007 20TH AVE S CENTERV/LLE MN 5~ 4886 HWY 61 STE: WHITE BEAR LAKE tt. 7029 20TH AVE S CENTERV/LLE MN 5~ 1955 EAGLE TRAIL CENTERVILLE MN 5E 1952 EAGLE TRAIL CENTERV/LLE MN 5~ 1946 EAGLE TR CENTERVILLE MN 5~ 6995 20TH AVE S CENTERV/LLE MN 5E 5535 FISHER CT WHITE BEAR LAKE tt. 7050 20TH A VENUI CENTERVlLLE MN 5~ 5500 ANDERSON E MAPLE PLAIN MN 55: PO BOX 368 HUGO MN 55038-000 jJ '~ tervi[[e 'Esta6[ished 1857 1880 :Main Street . CenterviIfe, 'MJ{ 55038 (651) 429-3232 . Pa.r.(651) 429-8629 OTY OF CENTERVILLE APPLICA nON FOR PRE,J.tIMINARY PLAT , J . .;t::;..1 ~ : + &1" AllY additional cools inCWTOO for DATEPAlD: 9120. '()~ tt 71tJ7 FEE:#lo.o."'.f4,t",...+ Enginecrillg, legal fess, publication or .U!~#'.4?aO tu,J- otherreouiranents. STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 7())('"w 2()~ A~ LEGAL DESCRJ).!lON q~PROPERTY: ouf tb I 1/ c;~1l t/,//P -;OWAJ ~~ pLk SIZE OF PARCEL (S): 38 IIU-i'j":!: PROPERTY OWNE~~...J ~~.p.(J.:/~(. "~(.I ~~o;f~..v i:';::p(':"':;7~~O 77 FEE OWNER: ~IIJiE ADDRESS:~z,r 2f)-IJ If\}( APPLICANTS INTEREST IN PROPERTY: X FEE OWNER LEASE HOLDER DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: f&,lthiAM-;..y CONTRACT PURCHASER OPTION TO PURCHASE /,,6/ Y;-JlL REASON FOR REQUEST: -;;: tU:ltI ~ M'.W ~.fl:r.f> ~/dtAJq t I By paying the above stalW fee, I undt:rstanU tlutl no n:fwlilil will be: issued ill full or in pm1, allfllY lime:, evc:n iflhe outcome is denial. ~~ did Signa re of Applicant 7 Date rI"fC ~~ ~iIc 'Signa reo~ -"'it:, LLz p CenterviUe Townoffice Park Second Addition Sedona Townhomes, LLC, developer and builder of the Centerville Office Park, 7029 20th A venue, proposes to build on Outlot A, the open area on the south end of the office park, a three story office building. The building footprint would be 9,920 square feet, for a total of29,790 square feet, and 149 parking stalls would be available for the building. The open space surrounding the building and parking would be landscaped with maple, ash, spruce trees, flowering crab apple trees, Japanese tree lilacs, and viburnam alfredos. Further, the landscaping in the center island of the parking lot would include tables and benches. On the south end of the new building there would be a large open patio with tables and chairs for outdoor meals and socializing. The exterior of the building would be concrete panels with decorative colors, many windows, and architectural detailing which would accent the entry, comers and rooflines. As part of 20th A venue reconstruction by Anoka County, a new turn lane will be installed at the site entrance. As traffic enters the office park the flow will be into the center of the parking lot and disbursed around and in front of the buildings. It is expected that the people coming to work would arrive during a one-hour time frame in the morning, and leave with a similar disbursal. The building setbacks from lot lines, roadways, neighboring houses and businesses are quite adequate. There is much open space created by Clearwater Creek on the south and west, the office park retainage ponds on the west, the new city commercial park on the east, and City Public Works on the north. Spruce trees on the west will create an effective buffer between the new building and the neighboring houses. Site work and construction would commence once approvals are obtained. The building would be ready for occupancy in the summer of 2007. Sedona Townhomes LLC requests your recommendation for approval for this exciting project. l3 a~ ~~ 9/U/()/' eL~p~~l -f~.fF,l.'7~ PEnnoN FOR V .t\R.IAN~E < . /I A5lJ. 00+ &po ,,-F IfdIJO. ~ e,-/y. #ty;t!~ hI}1 e~'e. i..-I- ~ ~ 'tosbs t::x~ee..d~~ .,I.-1:J~. $s Date: ~ (~~' Fee ~ + u~. Fees Zoning: JId-t. R~kni5J.J. Apphcant::P( "All "AIL "l..(... ~~'l '6Lv-'V'~-P( LG( Street Address: IV z.. i ~ ,(bf' Phone:C51..... ~7 -to7 7 City/State/Zip: ~Ak~il(P Jltv >'>01<] Status of Applicant: Owner X Lease Holder _ Other Legal Description of Property: 04-;.111 (;~'l-,.ilt, ~^' /.;;Z~ ,f~ Street Address (subject property): /f)XX J.Q~ AI( Description of Request: -,: ~-' It.e ".r~ 1I~c::t~~ 6t 7' IlAJ JI.tdi-l 0/ ("'~ A,..J) II' iJN ~ ~I C"OJt..Q<1l. Reason for Re<Ju~: ~ ~. 4jAJdttkv/ "A-...4a s-.L b"r;(t.e.1Ie Q.. 4"'( .~It. (LIt ~ ",. ~ :/ ~(/. ~ Q 6wk ~ r~ IN ",{u.&ler tit r~t{f-e ~ ~ S'c..I.~-ev./4x. f/I/c c.c.'jN-e,-u-f A variance is a use that is not generally permitted by the City's zoning ordinances but which is allowed in special cases only. A request for a variance from the City's zoning ordinances will be granted upon a showing of undue hardship by a property owner who is determined to have a unique situation. "Undue hardship" means that the property cannot be put to a reasonable use if the conditions of the zoning ordinances are followed, that the property owner's particular circumstances are unique and not self-created, and that granting a variance will not alter the essential character of the locality or neighborhood. Economic hardship alone will not constitute undue hardship if some reasonable use currently exists under the terms of the City's zoning ordinance. If the property owner purchased the property knowing that the City's zoning ordinances prohibited a use, the property owner's circumstances are self-created. CJ,~I-<!,.. J.5lJ Minnesota Statutes (MS 462.357, Subd. 6) and City Ordinances (Old. !! 1, e:. i:;il:lll 180-) require that the following conditions must be satisfied for approval of this request. Please respond to these conditions using additional sheets of paper if necessary. 1. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the parcel or lot, the proposed variance would relieve an undue hardship, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, should the applicable ordinance be strictly enforced. 2. The purpose of the proposed variance is not based exclusively upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but would correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. .. ---- ,[,1/ Centerville Townoffice Park Second Addition Sedona Townhomes LLC requests a height variance for the three-story office building to be built at the CenterviIle Office Park. The request is due to the soil conditions pre- existing on the site, which includes a high water table. This determines the ordinary high water elevation and the building lowest floor elevation is limited. In order to build a three-story structure and comply with proper drainage, the ordinance limit is exceeded by 7' on most of the building and II' on the front comer. The use of the variance would allow the building to get built as designed. The use of the site with a three~story office building is consistent with the zoning uses and has significant setbacks on all four sides. On the west, the boundary is 155 feet from the building. The use of 6' to 7' tall spruce trees, fifteen feet apart in a staggered row (refer to the landscape plan exhibit for placement) in addition to Clearwater Creek, will effectively screen the building from the neighborhood houses. The south boundary is over 200 feet to the commercial business, on the west is the boundary of 20th ave. at 89 feet, and on the north is the Centerville Office Park, to the north of that is Centerville Public Works building and City water tower. ;5' 3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by the City Ordinance and has not been created by any persons presently having an interest in the parcel of land. 4. The variance will not adversely affect public health, welfare and safety and will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood. 5. Variances wiJl not be granted that allow a use that is otherwise not a permitted use in the zoning district that the subject property is located. Signatureof~Plicant:~ ~ ~L.~ *By paying the above star&! fee, un<Ierstand that no wi issued in full, in part. or at an time, even though the outcome of Council's action is denial of the request APPLICANTS, PLEASE NOTE: All developers or property owners must submit the following information to the City of Centerville by the Tuesday that is 30 days PRIOR to the meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission or the City Council meeting at which the request will be heard at a public hearing. 1. Complete the application for the specific request and pay the fee. 2. Submit a complete survey and site plans (including measurements, dimensions), showing lot lines and building footprint, driveways, sidewalks, curb cuts, ingress, egress, etc. on the property and its relation to adjacent properties. 3. Explanation of materials that will be used and plans for screening, landscaping, fencing and dumpster enclosures. 4. Drawings of completed buildings, if appropriate to the project, and materials used. 5. Storm water retention and drainage plans. The Rice Creek Watershed District and/or other water management organizations may need to be notified of the project. 6. A letter explaining the reason for the variance request. The letter must also demonstrate the variance will not impact the surrounding properties nor impact the characteristic of the neighborhood in any manner. p, Draft ............................................................................ CITY OF CENTERVD...LE ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPROVAL OF CONDmONAL USE PERMIT 1. Permit. Subject to the tenns and conditions set forth herein, tbe City of Centerville hereby grants approval of a eonditional use permit for: Applicant, Jackson Commercial, LLC/Sedona Townhomes. LLC, to eonstruct a three-story building exceeding the normal height limit of 35 feet. Approval is granted to construct a building to a maximum height of 46 feet in accordance with the plans drawn by Michael 1. Thomas Architects dated September 18, 2006 and subject the conditions of this permit. 2. Property. The permit is for the following described property: (Insert Legal Description) 3. Conditions. This permit is issued subject to the following conditions: A The applicant shall conduct a noise study to verify that sound levels emitted by building heatinglcooling equipment will not exceed 70 decibels at the property line. B. Grantee wilJ follow the standards and requirements of the City of CenterviUe, Rice Creek Watershed District. Anoka County, Army Corp of Engineers, FEMA, Minnesota DNR and any other agency having jurisdiction over the project and shall secure and file with the City, any permits required by outside agencies. C. Approval is subject to staff and city engineer review for conformance with city code and standards. I Z7 Draft D. Applicant shall complete a site lighting analysis to confirm that outdoor lighting does not cause glare or spill off the property. E. Building colors shall complement the balance of the development. F. Building exterior wall panels shall be architectural grade concrete with sandstone finish and the entrance shall be enhanced with stone finish in acoordance with the submitted plan. G. Rooftop equipment plan shall be reviewed by the city and if the City detennines it necessary, rooftop equipment shall be screened from view of adjoining property. H Garbage and recycling m.-qJlaCles sbaJl be contained in an enclosure constructed of the same materials and with colors matching the building. I. The work authorized by this permit shall be completed within twenty-four months of the date hereof. J. Developer will execute a development agreement with the City ofCenterville. K. Developer shall dedicate a trail easement adjoining the County road right of way along the east side of the property. 5. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: CITY OF CENTERVllLE BY: Mary Capra, Mayor Attest: Teresa Bender, City Clerk STATEOFMINNESOTA ) ) 5S. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2006. by Mary Capra, Mayor and Teresa Ba1der, Clerk of the City of Centerville, a Minnesota nmnicipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. NotaIy Public 2 JP . . .SEDONATOWNHOMES,LLC 7029 20th Ave S Centerville, MN 55038 Office: (651) 762-4089 Fax: (651) 762-5604 January 4,2007 City Of Centerville, MN 1880 Main Street Dear City Administrator Dallas Larson, We have an exciting new design for the office building. We have designed a building with the buff and brown colors, added stone to the front and side, enhanced the lower front windows with a canopy ~ porch look, added white trim to the upper portions, white columns to the front, changed the wall materials and colors to create a visual separation of size and shape. We have lowered the building height in the northeast corner by four feet and added a parapet cornice for an architectural decorative effect. The enhanced building design has the colors, stone and porch characteristics of the first three buildings while bringing a distinctive cornice look. The four buildings with similar colors and architectural features, similar trees and shrubs, a parking lot pattern with landscaped peninsulas achieves a unity of design. This office park, with these features, will continue to buffer the residential zone from the commercial zone. Item B~ 1- The reduction in the number of parking stalls from 22 to 14 is actual usage. The City Council approved the change based on a parking study of similar offices. At this time two offices are occupied and the parking is adequate. The cities engineer has addressed the issue in his letter dated 12/28/2006. See attached Response to B-2: At the time the development contract was approved the county reconstruction of 20th was in the design stage. The City Council did not require a trail dedication. We propose that the trail dedication be in the area of the county temporary construction easement. The county will be vacating on December 31, 2009. The construction of the trail should be part of an overall plan and costs shared between benefiting parties. B~ 3 Response. We have been paying $600.00 per building permit. The city ordinances is $2,175 per acre, ($2,175 x 5.174 acres ~ $11,253.45) ($11,253.45/18 units ~ $625.00 per unit) The council agreed to $600.00 per unit. In the new development agreement we will be paying the full amount of the park dedication fee. ~ . . . . B~4 Response. We have planted trees and shrubs according to the approved landscape plan. The area not planted is the 2 building lots and outlot A. We have put in more trees than the approved plan. The drainage plan has been followed with the retention pond and rain water garden. The open drainage swale and retaining wall on the north end of the parking lot was changed to a buried pipe. The change was approved by the city engineer. We also requested and received approval to plant a row of spruce trees on the common boundary. In addition to the drainage, the city public works parking lot storm water catch basin drains water into the buried pipe which flows into our retention pond. Also the city water tower emergency overflow discharge pipe is placed to allow flow into our drainage pond. We have given the city permission to do so, since the pond has adequate capacity. Item C Response. With the construction of the new building this development agreement would be amended to fulfill the trail dedication, park dedication fees and adopt the new landscaping and drainage plans. Sincerel , v;fii aul Keleher Chief Manager Sedona T ownhomes, LLC paul@SedonaTownhomes.com ~ . . (95 Zi= 00 ..JO -< ::>0 IIlZ 0 '- WU <l.J c: UW '- 0 _U) u lL.::s::: ... lL.a::: VI <d O~ <l.J ..c. 1: 0 '-0 ~~ Z Cl I Cl N OlJ..z ~ 03 }-O~ ... N c: ..... W v (f)ww c: ..Q "ra E (t) ...J .....J I: ~ ...J.....J E v ~>> a 0 "" a:::~ '- v WWW '+- '+- VI 0 os: Z ..... l- v ZZ ~ a:: <( W W III ... :> VI UU 0 -J d'1 View of from Main Entry-Northeast Corner Last Revised January 04, 2007 , ( ~, A NEW 3 STORY OFFICE BUILDING ~~ CENTERVILLE OFFICE PARK SECOND ADDITION ( ~ CENTERVILLE, MN . ''n 300 FiRST AVE N SiJlTEZio MINNEAPOLIS, MN S5401-ilio9 COMMUNITY PLANNING. LAND PLANNING URBAN DESIGN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE MARKET RESEARCH Tel: 612-339-3300 fAx: 612-337-5601 WEB: DSlipIAN.tOM MEMORANDUM DATE: December 28, 2006 TO: MarkStatz, Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik FROM: Phil Carlson, AICP, Director of Planning, DSU/Bonestroo RE: Centerville T ownoffice Park - Review of Parking and Building Height The Centerville T ownoffice Park project has been revised to include a single three-story building and three smaller office condo buildings, vs. the nine small office condo buildings proposed previously. The issues of parking and building height have been raised in the review of the revised application. Parking In my experience, parking ratios for office and commercial uses have been decreasing steadily over the last thirty years, While most cities still use 1 space per 200 SF (5/1000 SF) for office buildings, many studies have suggested that larger suburban stand-alone office buildings could go to a standard bf 1 per 250 SF (4/1000) or lower. We recently completed a study for the City of Burnsville, resulting in ordinance changes to reduce all office and commercial parking requirements byaboutlO%, including minimum and maximum parking ratios for office uses of 3.5/1 ooa and 4.01l000, respectively. Medical/dental offices still require more than this, as would any restaurant or assembly use, suchasa conference center, that attracts patrons from off-site, above and beyond the employees within the building. For these uses,. a ratio based on seating would be appropriate, typically one ~jpace perthree seats. For the Centerville Townoffice Park, the numbers as I understand them break down as follows: . I assume each of the smaller buildings is 4,400 SF for a subtotal of 13,200, and the three-story building is 29,400 SF, for a total of42,600 SF. . 213 spaceswould be requiredby ordinance at 5/1000: 147 for the three-story building, plus 66 (22 each) forthe three smaller buildings, . 192 spaces are proposed on site.,. or 4.5/1000 overall. . 189 spaces would be required iswe assume 5/1 000 for the three-story building, and 14 per bUilding,for the three smaller buildings, as previously proposed by variance. . 180 spaces would be req uired if we assume 4/1000 for the entire project. . 194 spaces wauld be reqoiredif we assume 4/1000 forthe three-story building and 22 spaces each (5/1 000) for the three smaller buildings. I belieVe the 192 parking spaces shown (4.511000) would be adequate for the overall project as proposed, if all are general offices uses. I doubt that the parking lots would ever be completely full. Thiswouldstill require a variance. Assembly, conference center, or restaurant uses would have to be considered separately, and if needed, more parking or less building would have to be designed into the project. A condition of approval could be that parking will be adequate to serve all uses within the project, and if problems arise in the future, the city has the leverage to review the CUP and rE!quire changestoaddress the problems. ~~ "1. ~~ DSU Bonestroo 3S:~" .,-...:"'" J.:i-~J-/ 'c. /_..- Building Height The change from smaller office condos in a residential to style to a larger flat-roofed three-story building changes the character of the project, especially as it relates to neighboring residential uses. A CUP for increased height can include conditions directly related to the impact of the building height. There are a few things that could be considered to reduce this impact, particularly on the west side facing the neighboring homes: . Make the closest portion of the building lower - reduce itto one or two stories, rather than a continuous three-story fa(ade. · Have pitched roofs, like the smaller buildings, to lower the perceived height of the building. This would still need to be on a one- or two-story portion of the building on the west side. Simply putting a pitched roof on the three-story building would not have much effect in reducing the impact of its heiqht. . Adjust the site plan and landscape plan to place landscaping next to the building which will grow to at least 213 of the building height, instead of only out at the west edge of the parking lot. Landscaping clo~;e to the building will significantly soften the height of the fa~ade. . In any event, there should be a berm or dense landscaping along the entire west edge of the site to a minimum height of three feet to screen headlights from the parking lot toward the residences. Mark Statz Centerville T ownoffice Park December 28. 2006 ~~ (;~ 71~~ DSU 34 MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Kim Stephan DATE: January 4, 2007 SUBJECT: Request for Funding to Replace Skate Park Equipment Replacine: Skate Park Equipment Two (2) Sun Ramp quarter pipes and a spine have been (or will be) removed as they have become a safety hazard, mostly due to usage. The Sun Ramp equipment is constructed of fiber board under rubberized coating. The Skate Wave equipment has held up better, but it is metal and is rusting, as well as being louder and heavier equipment. Mr. Tedd Peterson, Public Works, recommends going with Rhino Ramp equipment through Dura Fun Recreation Products. The last equipment ordered was a quarter pipe and three (3) grinding rails in 2005, from Dura Fun. The quarter pipe, at that time, was $4,660, excluding shipping charges. Committee Member Mosher will contact Dura Fun for specific prices, but replacing these three (3) pieces will be a minimum of$15,000. Mr. John Meyer, Finance Director, said that replacing skate park equipment is not something that has been budgeted for in the past and there is not money available in the Maintenance Fund to cover the costs to replace this equipment at this time. In the future there could be money allocated, but the committee would have to request to have funds included in the budget over a period of time, with a schedule of equipment to be replaced. Motion was made by Committee Member Amundsen, seconded by Committee Member Selander to request City Council allocate the monies recently returned to the City from the District Memorial Hospital Board in the amount of $17,383.12 to be used to replace the skate park equipment at Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park. All in favor. Motion passed unanimously. 1 of 1 $ tervi{{e STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RES. #07-001 1880 :Main Street . Centervir[e, :M:N 55038 (651) 429-3232 . p~ (651) 429-8629 rr.sta6{islied 1857 A RESOLUTION TO SELF-ADMINISTRATE AN EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLAN WITH ASSISTANCE FROM AFLAC BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Centerville with assistance from AFLAC will self- administrate an employee benefits plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following guidelines are established beginning January 1,2007 for employees of the City ofCenterville participating in the plan: 1. The city contribution for calendar year 2007 will be $880 per employee. The contribution amount will be established on annual basis by the council. 2. The core plan that participants will be required to enroll in consists of the following: a. Single health coverage; b. Employee dental coverage; c. Employee life insurance $10,000. 3. Optional benefits offered to employees shall consist of the following: a. Supplemental and dependent life coverage; b. Dependent dental coverage; c. Short-term disability; d. Long-term disability; e. Long~term care coverage. f AFLAC insurance coverage 4. Employees will be allowed to contribute pre-tax dollars to the following or take the balance as taxable pay: a. Health insurance premiums spending account; b. Un-reimbursed health care spending account; c. Day care spending account; d. Deferred Compensation account. 5. The dollar limit for employee contribution to the un-reimbursed health care spending account shall be set at: a. $3,000 3~ Adoption of this resolution amends the City ofCentervilIe Employees - Cafeteria Plan signed on January 8, 2003. Adopted by the Council this lOth day of January, 2007. Attest City Clerk Mayor 31 tervi{{e CUtab{is/ied 1857 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #07-002 1880 :Main Street . Centervi{{e,:M:N 55038 (651) 429-3232 . Pa:{(651) 429-8629 A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE ANOKA COUNTY MULTI- JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, The State of Minnesota has ordained that every county and incorporated municipality in the State is required to have a Hazard Mitigation Plan approved by the Minnesota Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, to maintain eligibility for State disaster assistance after November 2004; and WHEREAS, the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 has ordained that every county and incorporated municipality within the County is required to have a Hazard Mitigation Plan approved by FEMA in order to be eligible for Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Funding for Presidential disasters declared after November 2004; and WHEREAS, under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has issued an Interim Final Rule that details the minimum criteria for local hazard mitigation plans; and WHEREAS, the City of Centerville agrees with the concept of and necessity for hazard mitigation planning; and WHEREAS, The Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee recommends the adoption of the Anoka County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan; and WHEREAS, The Minnesota Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management and the Federal Emergency Management Agency have conducted a review of and approved the Anoka County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan; and WHEREAS, The Anoka County Board of Commissioners formally adopted the Anoka County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan on November 28, 2006. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CENTERVILLE, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, hereby adopts the Anoka County Multi Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan as submitted this 10th day of January, 2007. Adopted by the Council this 10th day of January, 2007. 3i Attest : Teresa Bender, City Clerk Mary Capra, Mayor 3~ STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #07 - 003 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPOINTMENTS FOR 2006 THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLVES: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Centerville met on January 10, 2007 at City Hall; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Centerville discussed appointments for the 2007 year; and THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE HEREBY RESOLVES, the following person(s) are hereby appointed to the named positions: COUNCIL 1. Mayor Mary Capra 2. Council Member Michelle Lakso 3. Council Member Tom Lee 4. Council Member JeffPaar 5. Council Member Linda Broussard Acting Mayor - Council Member Lee Centerville Centennial Fire District Steering Committee Members - Council Member Paar, Lakso & Alternate Mayor Capra Check Signing Authority - Mayor Mary Capra, Acting Mayor / Council Member Lee & City Administrator Dallas Larson North Metro Telecommunications Commission Representative - Council Member Lakso North Metro Telecommunications Commission Representative Alternate - Council Member Paar Police Commission - Mayor Mary Capra, Council Member Lee & Alternate Rush Line Corridor - Mayor Mary Capra W/E Coalition - City Administrator Dallas Larson (Northeast Corridor) Weed Inspector - Mayor Mary Capra ",' l' ~. , .y~ COMMITTEES/COMMISSION Parks & Recreation Committee 1. Committee Member Karie Jakober 2. Committee Member Kevin Selander 3. Committee Member Kevin Amundsen 4. Committee Member Darrin Mosher 5. Committee Member Lori Harris 6. Committee Member Suzanne Seeley 7. Committee Member Linda Merkel Council Member Liaison - Council Member Lakso Planning & Zoning Commission 1. Commission Member Bob Wright 2. Commission Member Brian Hanson 3. Commission Member Ben Fehrenbacher 4. Commission Member Thomas Wood 5. Commission Member Mark Pangell 6. Commission Member D. Love 7. Commission Member Jennefer Klennert Hunt Council Member Liaison - Council Member Broussard ST AFF/CONTRACTED SERVICES Animal Control - Otter Lake Animal Care Center Attorney - Burstein Glaser Assessor - Anoka County Auditor - Abdo, Eick and Meyers, Inc. Building Official - Paul Palzer City Engineer - Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates City Forester - Mr. Joe Goetz Drainage Ordinance Committee - Staff Drug TestinglEmployment Medical Examinations - Choice Point/Blaine Medical Center Emergency Services Directors (Civil Defense) . Milo Bennett . Robert Makela . Paul Palzer Federal Savings and Loan - 4M, 4M+ Funds, Smith Barney & Main Street Bank Fire Marshall - Milo Bennett Fire Protection - Centennial Fire District Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) - Anoka County HRA Health Officer - .. t ~,,.~~"'f:., 1/ '"'~,.'4.-J COMMITTEES/COMMISSION Parks & Recreation Committee 1. Committee Member Karie Jakober 2. Committee Member Kevin Selander 3. Committee Member Kevin Amundsen 4. Committee Member Darrin Mosher 5. Committee Member Lori Harris 6. Committee Member Suzanne Seeley 7. Committee Member Linda Merkel Council Member Liaison - Council Member Lakso Planning & Zoning Commission 1. Commission Member Bob Wright 2. Commission Member Brian Hanson 3. Commission Member Ben Fehrenbacher 4. Commission Member Thomas Wood 5. Commission Member Mark Pangell 6. Commission Member D. Love 7. Commission Member Jennefer Klennert Hunt Council Member Liaison - Council Member Broussard STAFWCONTRACTEDSERVICES Animal Control - Otter Lake Animal Care Center Attorney - Burstein Glaser Assessor - Anoka County Auditor - Abdo, Eick and Meyers, Inc. Building Official - Paul Palzer City Engineer - Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates City Forester - Mr. Joe Goetz Drainage Ordinance Committee - Staff Drug Testing/Employment Medical Examinations - Choice PointIBlaine Medical Center Emergency Services Directors (Civil Defense) . Milo Bennett . Robert Makela . Paul Palzer Federal Savings and Loan - 4M, 4M+ Funds, Smith Barney & Main Street Bank Fire Marshall - Milo Bennett Fire Protection - Centennial Fire District Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) - Anoka County HRA Health Officer - \. . 1~; . '" ~ ~'~ ~.,.",..,.:t- ,. \~tJ \ , ',\ 1/ Municipal Financial Officer- Official Depository - Main Street Bank Official Paper - Quad Community Press Police Protection - Centennial Lakes Police Department Recycling Coordinator/Solid Waste Representative - Staff Senior Transportation Representative - Staff Solid Waste Advisory Committee Alternative - Mayor Capra Deputy Weed Inspector - Mr. Paul Palzer Passed by the City Council of the City of Centerville this 10th day of January, 2007. Mayor, Mary Capra Attest: City Clerk, Teresa Bender ;/2- tervi[[e uta6[isfied 1857 1880 :Main Street . Centervi(Ce, 'M'N 55038 (651) 429-3232 . Pa.:{ (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #07-004 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AS OUTLINED IN ORDINANCE #17 & EXHIBIT "A", FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT "7381 OLD MILL ROAD" THIS ENTIRE PROPERTY WILL BE PLACED IN ZONING DISTRICT R-2 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE P-l (PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC) & R-5 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL- ESTATE) ZONING DISTRICTS WHEREAS, subsequent to duly given mailed and published notice, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on January 2, 2007 and considered public comments regarding the aforementioned amendment and adopted its recommendation to City Council supporting the rezoning; and WHEREAS, the City Council, at their regularly scheduled meeting of January 10, 2007 considered the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation and concurred with their motion. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CENTERVILLE,NUNNESOTA: 1. The recommendation for rezoning of the subject property to R-2 (Single Family Residential) is hereby approved. 2. That the City Administrator or their designee shall ensure that the comprehensive plan amendment as approved be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for consideration and all documentation associated with the same is hereby approved and shall be recorded arid become official record of the City of Centerville. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council this 10th day of January, 2007. Mayor, Mary Capra Attest: Teresa Bender, City Clerk 13- CITY OF CENTERVILLE ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE #17 AN ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN PROPERlY FROM P-l (PubliclInstitutional District) and FROM R-5 (Single Family Residential-Estate District) TO R-2 (Single Family Residential District) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE ORDAINS: SECTION 1. City Code Chapter 154, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning from Residential R-5 and Public/Institutional P-l to Residential R-2, certain property located within the City of Centerville, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, and legally described on the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 2. The Zoning Map of the City of Centerville referred to and described in Chapter 154 shall not be republished to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the City Administrator or the City Administrator's designee shall appropriately mark the Zoning Map on file in the City Administrator's office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning provided for in this ordinance and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of January, 2007, by the City Council of the City of Centerville. Mary Capra, Mayor ATTEST: Teresa Bender, City Clerk 97498 EBK 1lI2I/Ol 41/ EXHmIT "A" Property in the City of Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota, identified by parcel numbers as follows: FromP-l: PIN # 14-31-22-31-0022 From R-5: PIN # 14-31-22-42-0036 97498 EBK 11/21/01 'IS' .,. #;.":.I\~ ~~~v? I!:f~ ~~t.P _~_____ (O_~'~P",____ EAST ~ OF SEe. 14, 131. R22 j I FOUND EAST QlJARltR ___. CENTER OF SEC. 14-, T 31. R 22-....... ,11,. ~ SEC. 14.131, R 22 ...." ~'1 NE CORNER GOV"T LOT 3 I " .........'\4'0 ;'\. I (ANOKA COUNTY l.IONUhlENT)~. _ _ _ _ NS9"29'4S"W _ _ 698.00 _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ',-. V N89"29'4S"W 2635.54 '} 2 .: - - - - ~ - ~ ~ ==-.==t _ _ _ l)4"EAS - - - - - - - - ---<. - S89'38'45"E 1 - - - - - - - - --... S89~ ~ -2~22 -. ! I I ~ ~tr~sew~R AUNE ! I 33 33 I ...-- ~~ P~:: I~~E ~;ED i I \, I OF" SEC. 14,T. 31,R. 22 I: I ,i:I 1------ ft!'r~T ~ II l}--+, l'; ,', " I /1 ~ ~:,: I ~ ! I I;;D I j l I ~ ~:: , : I I I:, ~ u~ i ~ZI~ / ::!I -\, ....1.-- I fR~' :~: I I -\: >\'; :i, 'I i ~.~~.,; ~~ } ,'....___NORTH UNE OF RLS NO. 48 />S MONUMENTED -_/_------ '.' ( " , ~ I v '- (-, '.' t, / ( , y / \\Q'0 , vX-\( C~ r, ....- ~, . " .,....-.................. ~r 1-_ . ~ I -, , 1-_ ~r I- _ , I , . '-- ,~ ".. . '-., . '-- ..... ,_, ,r..., ,....-, , '_' '."01,.-" ,...,,,,.. '--' -- I ~ .. .. -- S8l.;,~c?o\- Dl I I I " L ~I Ii I ii I " \i I I I I I , \ \.'" , / ~, l < , y . ( , v , J f@I:ZONIR:11 "'" "60,20 " /' "'-- .... .... ~~ / '\ /( ) / I J \ ( I I I ,,,', I I mr:.zo~ \ I I -I- I I I I I I I mr:.ZONfE:JJ rfi Ji'~ ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA (NOT TO SCALE) EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: (PER TlTLE COMMITMENT NUMBER 4-34576) PRELIMINARY PLAT ~of- HANZAl'S ADDITION -for~ JEFF & LAURA HANZAL 7381 OLD MILL ROAD CENTERVILLE, MN 55038 PH"" (651)-653-2020 OWNER/DEVELOPER EASEMENT DETAIL: DRAINAGE AND UnllTY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS, ~.oo I I 5-00 ~ I _ _ _ r _'~OO__ __ _ J I l___[~:______ BEING 10 FEET IN WiD TH ANO ADJOINING RIGHT-OF - WA Y LINES AND REAR LOT LINES. ALSO BEING 5 FEET IN WiDTH AND ADJOINING ALL OTHER LOT LINES UNLESS OTHfR",SE SHOWN ON THIS PLA T. PARCEL 1, All of Tract A. Registered Land Survey No. 48. files of the Regislror of Titles. Anoko County. Minnesota, Except the north 299.00 feet thereof. PARCEL 2: Outlot A, ACORN CREEK SECOND ADDITlON, Anoko County. Minnesofa. /1 I _L_ I I I I PARCEL J, That port of Government Lot .3, Section 14. Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota described os follows: Commencing at the most westerly corner of Tract A. Registered Lond Survey No. 48; thence on on assumed bearing of South 83 degrees 1B minutes 00 seconds East along the southerly line of said Tract A 0 distance of 355.00 feet to an angle point in said southerly line and the point of beginning of the property to be described; thence South 42 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds East along sold southerly line 0 distance of .340.00 feet to the westerly line of said Troct A; thence South 00 degrees 50 minutes 00 seconds West olong soid westerly line 0 distance of 52.00 feet to the easterly extension of the northerly line of Tract B. Registered Land Survey No. 48; thence North 89 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds West along said north line and its easterly eKlension a distance of 106.50 feet; thence northwesterly 72.66 feet along (J non-tangential curve concave to the southwest with a chord bearing of North 60 degrees 19 minutes 08 seconds West. Q radius of 50.00 feet and on included angle of 83 degrees 15 minules 51 seconds to 0 point of reverse curvature; thence westerly 69.84 feet along a reverse curve concave to the north with a radius of 100.00 feet and 0 central angle of 40 degrees 00 minutes 50 seconds; thence North 61 degrees 56 minutes 13 seconds West tangent to the previously described curve a distance of 90.93 feet; thence westerly 41.87 feet along a tangential curve concave to the south with 0 radius of 55.00 feet and on included angle of 43 degrees 36 minutes 54 seconds; thence North 30 degrees 30 minutes 23 seconds East a distance of 246.91 feet to the point of beginning. \ " ./ '-- , \~ ' EZIczoNfB :_, r- "- C I I... 1,' ,':.... r I I I.... ~ J.. r' - , , <, ~ c<", _ ~ZO~ , l~::-l, -,~ - GRAPHIC SCALE ------\-- \ \ ~,~- / /, ('< \- ' //" :,\, /" I: :-: ',"",J \ ~,_'~ - ,- -->. I'" - I: \ ',: ~/ <~L"'~"'/ I, /- :' \ 1- , '(, ~, < ,<' / - <: ') , \ \. ! (, ~ I v <: 'J '" ", V \/ - '/ :_, r-\ I ,i-r:~, I y ~':- / '-c' / " \ i-~ , f/ r-.... , "- C ~_.J -- 215 '" --- ,~ I ( IN FEET ) I inch - 50 rt ,< , ,> NORiH --- (:A- --- --- - --- ,~'- '\ \ \"'''' '\'\ ./.// '( \ :~ \ '\ " www.egrud.com Professional Land Surveyors 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Uno Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361.8701 1'\ '; ~ Imr:.zo~ , ...__FLOODWAY UNE PER l.-- FEMA 1AAP~ING / / / / / / / S:.~1;1 ZONING: - EXISTING Property is Zoned R-2, P-1. & R-5 - PROPOSED Outlot A is proposed to be rezoned to R-2 SETBACKS: - EXISnNG Front = 35 ft. Side = 10 ft. Rear = 25 ft Creek = 100 ft. Wetland =- 00 ft - PROPOSED VARIANCE Front on Lot 6 = 20 (t MINIMUM LO T REQUIRE MEN TS: - EXISTJNG Lot Width = 100 ft. Lot Area = 15,000 sq. ft. Building Size == 1.050 sq. ft. Garage Size = 440 sq. ft. LEGEND: . DENO TES IRON MONUMEN T FOUND AS LABELED o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 41578 ~OENOTES ANOKA COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT e DENOTES EXISnNG ~LL IS> DENOTES SANITARY SE~R MANHOLE 1;:; DENOTES HYDRANT IS OENOTES SOIL BORING o OENOTES CA TCH BASIN '& DENOTES WA TER SERViCE ~ DENOTES GA IT: VAL \IE rzIDENOTES TRANSFORMER ~ DENOTES F/BERopnC BOX III DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX ICl DENOTES CABLE BOX lEI DENOTES ELECTRICAL BOX ->>-<( DENOTES 12' & 76' RCP , """ DENOTES EXISnNG SPOT ELEVA TlON AREAS: - EXISTING PROPERTY AREAS, Total Property Area = 277,044i: Sq. n. (6.36:J: Acres) Total R/W == 16,1001: Sq. Ft. (0.371: Acres) Total Upland = 134,9471: Sq. Ft. (3.101: Acres) Total Wetland = 122,,008.1: Sq. Ft. (2.80:t Acres) - PROPOSED LOT AREAS' LOT 1 ~ 49,22J'" Sq. Ft. LOT 2 = 54.J5Ji: SQ_ Ft. LOT J - 40,022'" Sq. Ft. LOT 4 ~ Jl,20J'" Sq. Ft. LOT 5 - 47,J07'" Sq. Ft. LOT 6 = JB,BJH Sq. Ft. (1.7J Acres) (1.25 Acres) (0.92 Acres) (0.72 Acres) (1.09 Acres) (0.B9 Acres) NO TES: Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons. Inc. on 10-0.3-06. Proposed contours. storm sewer, ponding. wetland fill, and mitigation areas provided by Plowe Engineering. N.G. V.D. Vertical Datum Bearings shown ore on an assumed dotum. Contours ore at 2 foat intervals. Curb shots are taken at the top and back of curb. Wetland delineation completed by KjoIhaug Environmental Services Company, phone #952-401-8757. Trees togged with numbers 531-826 by Verni)( Forestry Consultants. phone 1763-757-1142, on 12-18-06. This survey was prepared using a Tifle Commitment prepared by Burnel mle file number 4-34576. Contact the Post Closing Department with questions or comments at (952)-844-6210. -- --,. DENOTES EXISnNG CONTOURS ------ DENOTES SETBACK LINE --- DENOTES ~TLANO LINE ~ DENOTES PROPOSED MlnGA nON AREA Ie ',;';<'''/j OENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE C::=J DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE c::.s:::::J DENOTES ~TLAND AREA I}Pl~tfh':1 DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE rIllIllIlIIllA DENOTES ~TLAND FILL AREA PER PLO~ ENGINEERING CER TlFICA TlON: f hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervisiDn and that 1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ORAlWoI BY: NAA JOB NO: Q6482PP DATE:: 11-27-06 ~CK BY: JER OWl; NO: PRfPLA TS SCANNEO 0 , 1-02-07 RE'dSJDNS PER CITY COMMENTS NAA 2 J NO. DA1[ DESCRIPnON BY ",\UII'", ,,~, !\f.$Ol"-4i'l,,, " ,'----.,,'.... ~ ".... ".)-'''':... . *: """"'. .. . \, (..~~:,~) ''''~:',+b.su~t:~", "lIlIn" ~~ Dote: LiCBnse No. 41578 N t!~t!~~~~~ ~~f?~rt~t! CONTROL and MmGGRAAp7iHI7cOsNcALAE LAN A City of Centerville, Minnesota V WETLAND FILL 9,057 sqft WETLAND MITIGATION 13,207sqft PUBLIC VALUE CREDIT (TO OUTLET) 21 MITIGATION REQUIRED 18,114 2: 1 MITIGATION PROVIDED = 19,197 GENERAL NOTES: 1) THE INF"QRMA liON SHOWN ON Tl-1ESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND lOCATION OF [XISl1NG UTILITIES 1$ NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO THE TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO AVOID DA~AGE TO THESE UTllITIES. 2) CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL AT 651-454-0002 FOR EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3) THE CONTRACTOR SHAll FIELD VERIFY SIZE. lOCATION, AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, AND STORM SEWER AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF INSTALLATIONS 4) INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM) STANDARD UTILITY SPECIFICATIONS (1999 EDITION) AND THE CITY OF CENTERVlLLE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 5) CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ary A MINIMUM OF 24 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY INT'ERRUPT!ON OF SANITARY SEWER OR WATER SERVICE TO EXISTING H()}JES OR BUSINESSES. (651) 766-4029 6) SEE SHEET C2 FOR STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) AND ADDHlONAL EROSION CONTROL DETAILS, LEGEND: -,- -.- STREET AND BI TUMINOUS NOTES. I) SAW-CUT EXISTING BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE CURB TO PROVIDE BUTT-JOINT 2) REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF EXISTING STREET MATERIALS AS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION IS INCIDENTAL. 3) RESTORE DISTURBED STREET TO EXISTING OR BETTER SECTION AS APPROVED BY ENGINEER 4.) CONTRACTOR SHALL USE TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES (IN ACCORDANCE 'MTH THE .MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES.) AS NECESSARY INHENEVER GRADING, UTILITY, OR PAVING OPERATIONS ENCROACH ONTO ADJACENT STREETS. STORM SEWER NOTES: ,87~b1 ~~ ~~~:~ ~~:: ~;~;H~EI:~:U~~L~: :A~~N~M~EM~G~ ~~P~EUNA~:~N~THER'MSE NOTED ON PLANS.., J) ONCE CASTINGS ARE INSTAlLED THE ONLY ALLOWED INLET PROT'ECTION IS 'NIMCO -1- WOOD FIBER BLANKET TO BE USED ON ALL SLOPES J: 1 OR GREA TER AS INDICA TED Eros.lon control blonke\ instolloUon 1. Seed area first. and place blankets .i\hin 24 hours of seeding. 2. Anchor bfonl<:et at the top of ihe slope in 0 6" Inch ~d;col $10\, backfill and compact J. Unroll in \he direc\ion of \he .o\er flo.; overlap ends 7 inches, edges 4 Inches; s\ople every J feet 4, Use longer anchors lor loose soils 5. 'MIen blankets ore placed shingle s\)IIe, overlap 7 inches and staple e\rllryJ leet. 6. Lay blankets loosely and maintain direct contact .ith the soil. Do not s\re\ch the blanket ~AIN !.!I:! OUTLIT I BIOFIL TRAY/ON BASIN (SEE PLAN FOR SIZE AND LOCATION) --I _ ~.I~ \>-ss'f:'. _-1_- M ;,; ~ DO Existing Watermain Existing Storm Sewer Existing Sanitary Sewer PropOs.ed Walermoin Proposed Storm Sewer Proposed Sonitary Sewer Existing Hydrant Proposed Hydrant Existing Sanitary Manhole Proposed Cotch Basin/Manhole Direction of Surface Drainage Proposed Con tour Existing Contour Silt Fence Proposed Spot Elevalion (Not~: Proposed spot ~~""l;ons shown 0'" ground S<Jdoc~ b;tumlnous surface. 0' <;lulie' I;ne unl~ss olher..;se noted) Existing Spot Elevation SOIL BORING LOCATION ). 888 887 ~_.J - 1t '1' '1" ( IN FEET ) I inch "" 50 ft 7,583 sqft sqft sqft r-iaj~It!lalK:e and t:vail,ll1,rm "rSecdiH1l8..<<:"C'l< Yt'&lj(~l"rin!l~di-:.;.l rrcp.n-candS<;<.'ll~!e{'pr\l JS.Jul)'20 . Mow 2!ll J linlt:.5(3ll o..l.1~s ap;u:1l \\ilh 1ll,!W"T dC'Ck I;.R iJIt.:h..'S ..lIthe :i:ooad . Or"~,mnJ m,w'"l11,ll. in early Seplember . 5p<>I "!'lay >.W<:dy _~~I<.-' ;uch a.' ihi'.l,~., t\....,.,.,(Nll iLlHl.5i\'e iJrr",,.., {hl~\;m",,\) Yetr I (f3JI.......,."~!{.l .. l-',"'-~\l~ m!<l s.:.:d ~M ~~I'I..'lllhC! :2~I..(~h'hC! 2.0 .. Mo'\" ~ w:.; hm....,; \~O -.la)"b ilpillt; ..'illl llWN'l d..-,;I:, t:-S )lr.;ila !.lIt lful.g.;\'1'..1fll1 .. .s.f"~ spr;!)' w..-edr :;"'':10 $\k:h:1.; (11)q!<S, f<'m<J\'C i,,~asiH' shru\'!$ y<!.,rI E....;;!n,Hion OWa ~ror. ~lw>uld t>cJ,\l'Clu;inf!. 'i',llhiu2 ",,~cks of~hmtlng. N;lli""p1Is;.'iC<<HillS!l maY(Otll;-be'l-6jlldlL~blU ~lllilll;l' .~Il<)uJd k :;pace,ll- 6 i!'ld....~ :If';lr: i!l """It drill fOW it ,lrill s..-wC<:! f1uj;n g.wIo\1h of f<lJi:a.il 'u....'! od)~ ll.'lnuah mllY in.1i(,loC 110-...... fcir ~l1>'l1'.c lTe<1'I<.'Ill ;<1"....ing Y~&J :'. M'-',,- ,,,,,,~ ",;(h !":1,"\"<,lr .1.::;"- (..II ;.",10<:$ "rfln.: W'.tmd ,dv:.tl.' _",,,,,I s<:' "f 'I'\,\'J)- "l'\"'~ Spt)l !.;n-~_~ "'<.-eli~' ~PC(;;,:;~;o,<, uec.lw ')o.nw$itci)'ll..1}'!:()jf'''l'lirt'm.;;illk1l'Ul..-rJIl.:(;:.:-1tkf'1'wm/;\\JJ<rcdli1Jg''U'Cl:c_j,~ YU{:l:E\'aJlla~il>li (\w~ ~"f{'pwil1 be g(~W 11\110:'\\ Will\,'1 "'!k...ll \\'WS. ",\Cd ip Illhl! i'bllli'\~ (}r"-l$<:";'l' ;,'rming ,'Ium,... ! --6 indJt'I apJ1 in ,!rill rones.. l>1U .dD .<h,'rl .s.'_'ffieI1,,\\-j;f~shO<.lWhcI:JOO>\1ii':g rltL~1t pr:>\\1h ,lfi'~l\"l:l and. r:>ll~,'"l' Mnol<\l~ r.-.,\;-' ir.dk3~\' n~cd !.... :Jl(\fC ("'"<111''Tll m('Will~ Yc:o.rJ M')$I~il\'j;f.k>llt>ll't'q<ljr"l!\\f<:hni.:li';Itm'\i;" M<>wtllll. ifrn:~~,' I,. {'I)lllwl ""'\:nJ..: alll'....h Slit'" ~i>l';Y "cuty ~p..;,.i6 .~< llc<,\kd - [>'OlI")T'.~ <../",,"],ll6I,k U1; inlcusk.J willi" d)...-c~ mi~!lll"Ct>r!J"I)""" gJoI3~ ,,1It\ rllms l.m1t-l"rm M'lwingJ>>ln..':c:>J3.<; ","onl~ <X;<;.,li:)ual1~ Sp"" ~?l".:~,rJ~ ...r....m~ if:'lo1\"~.J. Op';,_l hu"""", in n .~-) ~'''''- r'>lu~i,)n llh'TfL;lii"r, "'prj'I~.:lfl" 1~lf &fUll" Op,\...""l "-'1'I',ng i" ll. J-~ }'C>lr J....Il!;.if' I...... ~'lfilll"'" ,)~ ...'1lJl~ full '''It''"l'r~tc <\"i,:\ humi,,!! ,1( ~u~irlllefocbumin$; CROSS SECTION A-A 886 885 884 o EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (FOR SEEDING) (Le, ECONOJUTE OR STRAW-COCONUT BLANKET) 18" SOIL BLEND FILTRATION MEDIA (SEE NOTE '4) OVER EXCAVATE BEDS TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6" IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO PLACING FILTRATION MEDIA AND EROSION BLANKET AGGREGATE BEO w/ 6- PERFORATED DRAINTILE W/ SOCK (SEE DETAIL AT LEFT) 2'-:r AGGREGATE SHALL BE THE FOLLOWING 1"-1.5" DOUBLE WASHED STONE -OR- 1/4"_1/2- WASHED RIVER RUN PEA GRAVEL BIOFILTRATION BASIN NOT TO SCALE RIOF" TRA TlON BASIN NOTES I) BASIN TO REMAIN UNLINED. 2) CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CARE TO MINIMIZE COMPACTION OF SOILS J) FINAl GRADE ONLY UPON STABILlZA TION OF UPSTREAM AREAS 4) PROVIDE 18" SUBCUT AND BACKFILL TO FINISHED GRADE w/ PLANTING MEDIUM (WELL BLENOED MIXTURE OF: 40% SEMI COURSE WASHED SAND OR NATIvE SOIL, J07, MnDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST AND J07, NATiVE TOPSOIL BY VOLUME) 5) SEED WITH MIXTURE 328 AT ee LBS/ACRE 6) NO MINING OF SANOY SOILS IS ALLOWED IN JNFIL TRATION BASIN PReP D Yot AND SU F .&.CE (NINI UN 10 YDRIC 5 ILS) 10 30 (FEET) 40 50 20 BAFFLE / / / / / / / / / / :_.... r /' I"C-....:~~, I l. ' r- 7.... \ ~ I-.. ,"" r"\ C 'c ..... I I 1 I r-.... , ;... C \, T ,.,.",,~.. / ~J\-1" , /' ~, ;.. "\ l..... /" ~ / / '--.--.J.... " "- " WEIR DETAIL NOTES: \) ALL WOOD SHALL BE REDWOOD OR TRE....TED WOOD SUITABLE FOR CONTACT WITH GROUND 2) ALL FASTENERS SHALL BE HOT-OIPPED GALVANIZED G..6" (~I lDt...:::::1E:. DESIGNED BY ~ DRAWN BY: ~ 11/27/06 12/21/06 1/05/07 CiTY SUBMITTAL PACKAGE, RCWV COMMENTS REVlSE POND TO INCLUOE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. ReWQ COMMENTS UPOA TED EA$EM(N T LINES CHECKED BY: ~ PROJECT NO: 061097 DATE: REVISION ( < , , : o>sn I : ! (0' ~t.l"''''.-I '~.~l"'" ~-----------~ ;:: I ~ ("J.. 9Q9 , ~O~b I'" ~~,\~:CfAwr I "(;l ~~T~ ,..~1l)C \ ><'tl"l6~ I I l,..'@t' 11,,'tfllll ,,~!>9 ::<11~_~1 99_~Q 99o~ ...UB,t.1l91_~~ . ,,~ ,,~'/:,o,t> 1-,((,"-:_ "Ull'''''' I ;-go)':> t~(,1 ><'d.!I9\ i"E-8' .~_1" 911~ 1l'l7-l... ",8~ ,,~,,-J ,,~7_911 o~i:i- r'*- i ",*1.-1\"91'>_61; ~\; : oO!.)' -"0,> ,..'fl1-'''> ",1,t.BfGE- O~ I : ,.h\~ ,,~t7:;'..J, "U",1)711<}~eo i f<.-q...f:Jr.,] "'1l~_'6" i (,,~ (o.~,r.,~6~) : " l=l " ' 690..... '" I 1l<j1;1l\ r<tIi. 1199lB '" 69\'<; '" 690,1& xC,( ~ \!o*6) '" ~9..,) ll'il10. "'(j.. '" . \ "..... \:.. 9()O7"> .'" p,90.)' <:$- ~."'2 , '" " 12.: RC 'APRONS VII JRASHGUARD 1.&. BBO,O - CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 6" Pile (SOllO COVER CLEAN OUTS) AT BENDS (AS SHOWN) FIL TRA TlON BASIN HWL 892.15 "qCI10. -,c.~\..~":. gQO-~~ '" - - ~..~ - - - ~~ - - - - ROCK CONSTRUCTIO~ ENTRANCE .- 0' :LOWEST FLOOR- ELEVATION-OF EACH~ LOT TO BE D.3' ABOVE LOWEST IELEVA TION INDICA TED WITHIN PADS. .I ~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _...,. ..J~"I; , , ~, , - _ x , I _ v - ) .90.'1 ,<j01)" ( - _ X 9lJlIq'I" , , '- ' '""~ \ \"1; . . ~~~~~';c~tt" . I ,:,:::,>>0,,0 ,<j010'- ; ~b';C,~~~,i.' )l~ . .., . ,,~":.~. . "l'l>.,__8 -\ ~~O~~~g~INR~gU~~'1:E~~STO !.lEET \ I '-:-- \.'.r-- , ,_:: :IX, HOt.lE lOv.{ST FLOOR ELE~A1(O",8;5.51 , . , - >\ EXIS~,!R,s.rORM TO BE REt.lOVEO.-ANQ'....REROu.TED FIELO :.'CIFY LOCA TlON < y v' ~ t~~\~E ,-A -"/'"\ -. <-\ ......""" '-' ','v\ 1-:': ~ ,-, 1- ,! ~ I, \\ ,"-' ",',-\ - -< , ( _ v , ) ..... ...... - , < ' , - , ) < ' v , ) (:..1 -'~- \...~~ -"r-_ ...... ...... ...... ...... WC"_1~,\ / ...... ...... ," ...... ...... \ I ~ I I I I \ ...... ...... ...... ...... / / / ...... ...... I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the lows of the Slate of M;nnesota PR[PAR[D FOR DATE: 10/.31/06 .'"lfCD JEFF AND LAURA HANZAL 7381 OLD MILL ROAD CENTERVILLE, MN 55038 PHONE, (651) 653-2020 PLDWE ENGINEERIJIG 6776 U.KE DRIVE NE. sum:: 110 UNO LAKES. MN ~SOl~ PIlONE: (651)3(,I-H21O F.....X: (MIJ]61.8?01 SHEET Cl CRAIG G. SCHLICHTING DATE: 1(05(07 LICENSE # 41295 HANZAL '8 ADDITION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN City of CenterviIJe, Minnesota GENERAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE I The Permiltee(s) (either the owner or operator) must routinely Inspect the construction site once every seven (7) days during active construction and within 24 hours after 0 rainfall event greater than 0_5 inchE'S in 24 hours. 2 All inspections and mainlenance conducted during cOl'1s\ruction must be recorded in writing and these records must be retained with the SWPPP in accordance with RECORD DETENTION, Records of each inspection and mOlntenance activity sholl include: shOll include o Dote and lime inspections: b Name of person(s) conducUng inspections; c Findings of inspectl-ons, including recommendoUons for correcUve actions; d CorrecUve ocUons token (including doles. times, ond party completing maintenance aCUvities); e Dote and amount of rain foil events greater than 1/2 inch (0.5 inChes) in 24 hours; ond f. Documentotion of changes mode to the $WPPP. 3 Where ports of (he construction site halfe undergone linal stabilization, Qut work remains on other ports of the Site, inspections of the stabilized areas may be reduced to once per month. Where work has been suspended due to frozen ground conditions. the required inspections and maintenance must toke place os soon os runoff occurs at the site or prior lo resuming construction, whichever comes first 4 All erosion prevention and sedimenl control BMPs must be inspecled to ensure integrity and effectiveness. All nonfunctional BMPs must be repaired, repfaced. or supplemented with functional 8MPs. The Permitee(s) must investigale ond compl)' with the following inspection and maintenance requirements: a All sill fences must be repaired, replaced. or supplemented when the)' become nonfunctional (develop lears, detach from posts, post become dislodged from ground, etc.) or the sediment reoches 1/3 of the height of Ihe fence. These repairs must be mode within 24 hours of discovery, or os soon as the field conditions allow access b Temporary and permanent sedimentation ponds musl be drained and (he sediment removed when the depth of the Sediment collected in the basin reaches 1/2 the storage volume. Drainage and removal musl be completed within 72 hours 01 discovery or O'S soon os field candilians allow access c. Surface waters, including drainage ditches and conveyance systems. must be inspecled for evidence of sedimenl being deposiled by erosion_ The Permitee(s) must remove 011 deltas and sediment deposited in surface waters. including drainagli! ways. catch basins. and olher drainage systems, and restobilize the areas where sediment removal reswlls in exposed soil. The removal and stabilization must lake place within selfen (7) days of discovery unless precluded by legol. regulalory, or physical access con'Straints_ The Permitee sholl use all reasonable effods to obtain access. If precluded. removal and slobilizotion must toke place within seven (7) calendar days of oblaining access The Permitee is responsible fQr contacting 011 local. regional state and federal authorities and receiving any applicable permits. prior to conducting any worw: d Construction site vehicle exit locations must be inspected for evidence off-site sediment tracking onto paved surfaces. Tracked sediment must be removed from 011 off-sile paved surfaces. Within 24 hours of discovery. or if applicable. within 0 shorter lime e The Permitlee(s) ore responsible for the operation and mainlenonce of temporor)' ond permanent water qualit)' management BMPs, os well os 011 erosion prevention ond sediment control BMPs. for the duralion of (he construction work at the site The Permittee(s) ore responsible unlil another Permitee haS assumed control over areas of (he site that hove no( been finally stabilized or the site has undergone final stabilization. and a Notice of Termination has been submitted to the MPCA (see TERMINATION OF COVERAGE). f. If sediment escapes the construction site. off-slle accumulations must be remo"ed in a manner and al a frequency sufficienl to minimize aff-sile impacts (e_g., fugitive sedimenl in streets could be waShed into slorm sewers by the next rain and/or pose 0 safety hazard to users of public streets;) 5 All infiltration areas must be inspecled to ensure thot no sediment from ongoing cons.lruclion acti"ilies is reaching the infiltralion area and these areas ore protected tram compaction due to construclion equipment drilfing across the infiltration area POllUTION PREV[NTlON MANAGEMENT MEASURES The Permilee(s) sholl implement the following pollution prevention management measures on the site' 1 Solid Wosle: Collected sediment. asphalt and concrete millings, Iloa\ing debris, paper. plastic. fobric. constructIOn and demolition debris and other wastes must be disposed of properly and must comply with MPCA disposal requirements 2 Hozordous Materials: Oil, gasolinE!. paint and any hazardous subs lances must be properly stored, including secondary containment, to prevent s;pills. leaks or other discharge Restricted access to storage areas must be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste must be in compliance with MPCA regt'latians J External washing of trucks and other construction vehicle must be limiled to a defined area of the site. Runoff must be conloined and wasle properly disposed of No engine degreasing is allowed on s;ite D[WA TERINC AND BASIN DRAINING 1 Dewatering or basin draining (e'9_. pumped discharges. trenCh/ditch cuts for drainage) related to the construclion activity that moy have turbid or sediment laden discharge woter must be discharged to 0 temporary or permanent sed_mentation basin on the projecl sile whenever possible_ If the waler cannot be discharged to 0 sedimenlotion basin prior to entering the surface .....oter. it must (reated with the appropriate BMP, such that the diSCharge does not adversely affect the receiving water or downstream landowners. The Permittee(s) must ensure that discharge points ore adequately prolected from erosion and scour The discharge must be dispersed over no/ural rock riprop. sand bogs, plos;tic sheeting or other accepted energy dissipation measures. Adequate sedimentation control meosures ore required for discharge water that contoins suspended solid'S 2. All water from dewatering or bosin droining o(::!i"ities must be discharged in 0 manner that does not couse nuisance conditions. erosion in receiving channels or on downslope properties. or inundation in wetlands causing significant adverse impact to the wetland AMENDMENTS TO Swppp The Permitlee(s) must amend the S'NPPP os necessary 10 include additional requirements, such as additional or modified BMPs. designed to correct problems identified or address situa!ions whenever 1 There is 0 change in design, conslruction, operotion, maintenance, weather or season conditions Iha! has 0 significanl effect on the discharge of pollutants 10 surface waters or underground waters; 2 Inspections or investigations by site operators. local, state or federal officials indicate the SWPPP is not effective in eliminating or signifl-canUy minimizing the discharge of pollutants to surface waters or underground waters or thot the discharges ore causing water quality standard exceedances, or J The SWDPP is not achieving the general objectives of controlling pollutants in storm waler discharges associated with construction activity. or the SWPPP is not consistent wi(n the terms and conditions or this permit 4 AI any time ofler permit cQlferage is effective. the MPCA m<:lY determine that the project.s slorm water discharges may couse, h<:lve reasonable potential to couse, or contribute to non-attainment of ony applicable water quality standard. If MPCA makes such 0 determination, the MPCA will notify the Permittee(s) in writing In response, Ihe Permiltee(s) must develop 0 supplemental BMP action plan or appropriate SWPPP amendments describing SWPPP modifications to address the identified concerns and submit information requested by the MPCA. which may include an individual permit application. If MPCA's wrillen notification requires a response, failure to respond within the specified time frame constitutes 0 permit violation FINAL STABllIZA nON The Permitee(s) must ensure final stabilization of the site. The Permitee(s) must submit 0 Notice of Terminalion within 30 days altli!r final stabilization is complele. or another owner/opera lor (Permittee) has assumed control over 011 areas of the site that have not undergone final stabilization_ Final stabilizatiOn con be achieved in One of the following ways: 1 All soil disturbing ol the sile hove been completed and 011 soils must be stabilized by a uniform perennial vegetative cover with 0 density of 70 percent over the en lire previous surface area. or other equivalent means necessary to prevenl soil failure under erosive conditions and; Q All drainage ditches, constructed to drain water from the site after construction IS complete, must be stabilized to preclude erosion; bAil temporar)' synthelic. and struclural erosion prevention and sedimenl control Best Management Plans (such as silt fence) must be removed os port of the site final stabilization; and c. The Permitee(s) must clean out all sediment from conveyances and from iemparary sedimenlaUon basins thai ore 10 be used os permanent water Quality management basins. Sediment must be stabilized to prevent it from being washed back into the basin. conveyance and drainage ways discharging off-site or \0 surface walers, The clean oul of permanent basins must be sufficient to return the basin to design copacity_ 2 For residential construction only, final stabilization has been achieved when temporary erosion protection and down gradient perimeter contra! for individuol fats has been completed and the residence has been transferred to the homeowner. Additionally. the Permitee must distribute the MPCA "homeowner fact sheel" \0 the homeowner to inform the nameowner of the need for. and benefits 0(, Final stabilization RECORD DETENTION The SItvPPP. all changes to il, and inspections and maintenance records must be kept at the site during construction by the Permitee who has operational conlrol of lhat po lion of the site. The SWPPP con be kepl in either the field office of in on on -site vehicle All owner(s) must keep the SWPPP, along with the follOWing additional records. on file for three (3) years alter submitted of the NOT os outlined in TERMINATION OF COVERAGE. This does not include any reCOrds ofter submillal of Ihe NOr 1 Any other permits required for the project: Re~ords of 011 i""spection and maintenance conducted during construction 2 All permanent operation and maintenance agreemenls thal hove beell implemented, including all right of woy. contracts, covenants. and olher binding requirements regarding perpetuol maintenance; and 3 All reqUired calculations for design of lhe temporary and permanent storm woter management systems TERMINA nON OF COVERAGE 1 Permittee(s) wishing to terminate coverage under this permit must submit 0 Notice of Termination (NOT) to Ihe MPCA, Compfian<:e with the permit is required until 0 NOT is submitted. The Permittee(s) authorization 10 discharge under this permil terminates at midnight of the day the NOT is signed 2 All Permitlee(s) must submit 0 NOT within thirty (30) days after one or more of the following conditions hove been mel o Final Stobilizotion has been achieved on af( portions o( the site for which the Permitee is responsible (including the removal of 011 lemporary erosion control measures such os silt fence. and if applicable, returning agricultural land to its pre construction agricultural use); Anolher owner/operator (Permitee) has assumed control according to Part II.B 5 of MPCA Permit No_ MN Rl0000l o..-er all areas of Ihe sill' thai hove nol been finally stabilized; or For residential construction only, temporary erosion protection and down gradient perimeter control for individual lots has been completed ond the residence has been transferred to the hom€owner, Additionally. the Permitee must distribute the MPCA's "homeowner fcclsheet" to the homeowner to inform the homeowner of the need for. and benefits of. final stobilization EFI090N COOTRa. lAEA9.R:8 SITE SPECIFIC EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SITE 0ESCIFI10H A) PROJECT NAME HANZAL B) PROJECT LOCATION: OLD MILL ROAD C) PROJFCT DFSCRIPTlON This project will consist of construction of five single family homes with 0 bituminous driveway. Hard surface run-off, to include street and roof run-off, will be collected ond routed via storm sewer to the new pond. Sail disturbing activities will include: installation of a rock construction entrance: installation of silt fence where surface run-off leaves site; site qrading;building construction including foundation excavation; drilfeway construction; and preparation for turf restoration. 0) PERCFNTAGE HARi1 SURFACE: 14.27- E)~ TOTAL SITE AREA TOTAL ESTIMATED IMPERV10US TOTAL ESTIMATED PERVlOUS 0.16 ACRES 4.50 ACRES F) TOT AI DISTlJRRFD ARF A 2.80 ACRES G) SITE SEQUENCING OF GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES: PriOf" 10 any grodin9 operotions, the contraclor shall install a rock construction entrance and perimeter silt fence os shown on pion. (Conlact City to inspect erosion control measure, if necessary,) Additional sill fence may be necessary if local condilions require Perform remainder of site grading on on orea-by-areo bosfs to minimize uncompleted areas. As each area is completed, all exposed soils must hove temporary erosion control protection or permanent cover according to lhe following lime table: Co Maximum time on area con remain ope,... when the area is rlatactivelybeing....ar...ed) All sod, seed, mulch and fertilizer sholl conform with the following MnDOT specifications os modi-tied below ITEM MnDOT SPECIFIC A TIONjNOTES 3878 3876 Mixture W5 (at 8 Ibs/ocre) Mixture 328 (at 88 Ibs/acre) NEW Mixture 260 (100 Ibs/ocre) - OR - NEW Mixture 270 (120 Ibs/acre) Mixture 100B (100 Ibs/acre) Mixture 110 (100 Ibs/ocre) Mi:dure 150 (40 Ibs/acre) Mixture 190 (60 Ibs/acre) Sod Seed U For Wetland Mitigation Areas U For Infiltration Areas . For Turf Establishment Temporary Fall Cover Spring/Summer Cover I to 2 years of Cover 2 to 5 years of Cover MulCh Fertilizer 3882 (Type 1 - Disc Anchored) 3881 "Ta reduce weed esloblishmerlt, mow 2 to 3 times (30 dQ)'S aport) during the lsl year with the mower dec~ about 6" - 8" off the ground hAow one time during the 2nd year before weeds set lheir seeds;. Burn or maw once every 3-5 years follo..ing the initial 2 years of mai"lenonce to remo"e dead plant moterial and stimulate new seed 'l.4ow a minimum of once per 2 weeks Seeding operations should be in accordance with the technical leller issued by MnDOT doted November 14, 2005 titled .'Metro District Turf Establism~nt Recommendations" 3. The contractor Snail pay special attention to 011 adjacent property lines and make sure the erosion control practices inplace in those areas prevent migration of sediment onto adpcent properties If any slopes appear to be failing, additional sin fence, biorolls and erosion control blanket sholl be added as needed The contractor sholl maintain and repair 011 silt fence (including the removal of accumulated sedimen t) un ta vegetalion is established and the site is stabilized. (See also INSPECTIONS AND ~AINTENANCE) Contractor 10 maintain silt fence, including the remOVQI of accumulated sediment, until vegetation has been established Final grade swale areas upon stabilizalion of upstream lJreas. Sod 011 disturbed drainage areos, including swales, around storm se....er flared-end sections, and off-street catch basins Upon grading completion the contractor Shall provide native topsoil, seed, and mulch anchored with a straight set disc within 48 hours of final grading 8. Excess slJil should be treated like other exposed soil and stabilized \lljithin 72 hours WIMCO INL.ET I=~OTECTION 81RlJCTURAL PRACTICES 1. Silt Fence - will be Installed prior to any grading activities along Ihe perimeter of those portions of the sile which ore downstream of storm water run-off 2 Storm water Monagement - Storm waler drainage will be provided by curb and gutter, storm sewer and catch basin. Run-orr is to be collected via curb and gutter and routed to 0 proposed on-site pond and then into on eXisting regional pond system.. OTHER CONTROLS 1. Conslruction Waste Materials - All waste materials generated os 0 result of sile construction shall be collected and removed accordinq to all local and/or slale wasle management regulations by 0 licensed solid waste management company The contractor will ensure that 011 site personnel ore instructed in these practices 2 Hazardous Wostes - Alf hozordous waste materials shalf be stored properly to prevent spills and vandalism When necessary. hazardous wastes will be disposed of in the manner specified by local and/or stale regulation or by the manufacturer 3. Sanilary Waste - All sanitary wasle will be collected from the portable units by 0 local. licensed water management company, os required by local regulation 4 Offsite Vehicle Tracking - A rock construclion entrance has been provided to help reduce vehicle tracking of sediments. The paved street adjacent to the site entrance shall be swepl on on os-needed basis, or os determined by the City Dump trucks houling loose moterials (sand, topsoil, etc.) to and/or from the site sholl be covered with 0 tarpaulin 5 Vehicle Cleaning - No engine degreasing is allowed on~site_ External washing of vehicles to be confined to a defined area ('"bane )lOrd") on-site MPECT1ON8 />K) t.lAINTENANCE PROCElllJII:S <Alto see 'Inapections and Mmtenance' ulder '<:aERAL EROSION AND SEOI.ENT CONTROL) The fallowing ore the inspeclion ond maintenance practices that will be used to maintain erosion and sediment controls . All control measures will be inspected at least once each weli!k and following any slorm even of 0.5 inches or greater . All measure will be moin\oined in good working order; if 0 repair is necessary. it will be iniliated within 24 hours or report . Built up sediment will be removed (rom silt fence when it has reached one-third (1/3) the heigh I of the fence . Sill fence will be inspected for depth of sediment. tears, to see if the is securely attached to the fence posts, and to see that the fence posts ore in the ground . Temporary seeding and planting will be inspected for bore spols. washouts. and healthy growth . A moinlenonce report will be mode after each inspection ST<:RAWA TEll MANAGElAENT PONDS Desi n Storm = SCS. 24-hr, Tell 100 YR Hi h Water Level _ 100 YR Post Oevelo ment Discor e 100-YR Pre Develo ment Discor e 10 YR Hi h Waler Le"el _ 10 YR Post Develo ment Discor e 10 YR Pre Oevelo ment Discor e 2 YR Hi h Water Level _ 2 YR Post Develo men t Discar e 2 YR Pre Develo men\ Dischar e POND 892.15 19,31 26,14 891.21 10,45 13_14 890.50 2.85 4-41 Oeod Stor<:lge Provided = 13.507 Dead Storage ReqUired = 12.632 PREPARED BY PLOW( ENGINEERING ON 12-21-06 (CGS) ""UG:" ~ :WNSll ~";1l~1: ~Vf'nJ,"'" n'1I>1(;;;, .l.,,'_'~""';; ...,,~ ~L" "'1m J<I::;,.. ~1i:~~~W"J,C'f ~'~.~:"".ll~~ ;;':W?~:;"..I,W; ;;C' ~ '1 :~ " ORAWN BY: ~ 11/27/06 CITY SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. RCwa COI.4MENTS 12/21/06 REV1SE POND TO INCLUO( FUTURE DEVElOPl.AENT. RCWD COMMENTS 1/05/07 UPDATED EASEMENT LINES I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision Qnd thol I om 0 duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the lows of the Stote of Minnesota. DESIGNED BY: ~ CHECKED BY: ~ PROJECT NO: 061097 CRAIG G. SCHLICHTING DATE REV1SION DATE: , /05/07 LICENSE # 41295 -"C) PLDWE ENGINEERING 6776U.KEDRNENE,SUITE 110 Ul'lO L-\KES, MN 55014 PHONE: (651)361_~210 FAX; (6.'i1)361.~701 RIPRAP DET AIL 111I- 1111 ;elllllll f',O'-2'O.SEESEC.A-A 111~1I111111 1II1 rrn L THECCf'lTRACTOR.ATliIScPnON,NAYSlJ9snruTE A CEOTExnLE ~.oaRlC, SPEC_ J601 FOR THf: GR.NULAA FILtER lLAHKE:T UNLESS O"",ERWlSE SPEOFlEO IN TilE PLAHS_ ""'E ~.oaRlC StlC!JLO COVER TIlE ARE. OF THE ArPRAP ANO EX fEN(! Ut(QEA I!-I( OJlllE1U APRON J "'CH. E~O~ION CONT~OL. NOTE~ o.."rlapgeot"xtaelobTi" 6. ontl lott..n ot 2' intervolt 2.. 2'.oocl ortt",,1 r.ncoe pll't.... mox. Spocin!il Wir. mesh r.inl!ll"ument. Std ~e~~. '~eCt"h ~:;';n~"6~i1~ min 14 llz <;lou9" .~re it optillnol Wir.'.ncenotr.qu"'"d'orlhisprojiI'Cl Geotextil" lObr", - overlap lobr;c 6.ond(ost"notZ'int<fo"VO/5" loy lobn<:; in the trench g ~< ~ . '0 ~ ~~ ~~ ~IL. T plENCE ~Wi..tnuhianol-.quir"d ~~ ~;k-- /~~' ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SWALE WI ENKAMAT ENGINEERL"iG PR[PAR[D FOR' DATE. 10/31/06 JEFF AND LAURA HANZAL 7381 OLD MILL ROAD CENTERVILLE. MN 55038 PHONE, (651) 653-2020 SHEET C2 TREE NUMBER COMMON NAME 531 Green Ash 532 Green Ash 533 Green Ash 534 Black Willow 535 Black Willow 536 Cottonwood 537 Green Ash 538 Green Ash 539 Green Ash 540 Green Ash 541 Green Ash 542 Green Ash 543 Boxelder 544 Green Ash 545 Boxelder 546 Green Ash 547 Boxelder 548 Green Ash 549 Green Ash 550 Green Ash 551 Green Ash 552 Green Ash 553 Green Ash 554 Green Ash 555 Green Ash 556 Green Ash 557 American elm 558 Boxelder 559 Boxelder 560 American elm 561 Green Ash 562 Green Ash 563 Boxelder 564 Green Ash 565 Boxelder 566 Green Ash 567 Green Ash 568 Green Ash 569 Boxelder 570 Boxelder 571 Boxelder 572 Boxelder 573 Boxelder 574 Boxelder 575 Green Ash 576 Boxelder 577 Boxelder 578 Boxelder 579 Boxelder 580 Boxelder DIAMETER 6 6 8 21,15,14.13,13 15 7 6 7, 6 8 6 9 10 7 6 6 6 7 6 6 6 9 8 6 6 6 7 6 7 6 9 12,7 13,10 15 12 7 7 6 8,7,6 6 8 7 6 6 7, 6 7 8 8 7 6 7 SPECIES Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Salix Spp. Salix Spp. Populus deltoides Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acer negundo Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acer negundo Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acer negundo Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Ulmus americana Acer negundo Acer negundo Ulmus americana Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acernegundo Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acer negundo Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acernegundo Acernegundo Acernegundo Acernegundo Acernegundo Acer negundo Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acernegundo Acer negundo Acernegundo Acernegundo Acer negundo ~ TREE NUMBER COMMON NAME 581 Green Ash 582 Green Ash 583 Green Ash 584 American elm 585 Green Ash 586 American elm 587 Green Ash 588 Green Ash 589 Green Ash 590 Green Ash 591 Green Ash 592 Green Ash 593 Boxelder 594 Green Ash 595 Green Ash 596 Green Ash 597 Green Ash 598 Green Ash 599 Green Ash 600 Green Ash 601 Boxelder 602 Silver Maple 603 Green Ash 604 Green Ash 605 American elm 606 Green Ash 607 Green Ash 608 Green Ash 609 Green Ash 610 Boxelder 611 Green Ash 612 Green Ash 613 Green Ash 614 Green Ash 615 Green Ash 616 Boxelder 617 Green Ash 618 Boxelder 619 Green Ash 620 Boxelder 621 Green Ash 622 Green Ash 623 Green Ash 624 Green Ash 625 Boxelder 626 Boxelder 627 Boxelder 628 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 629 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 630 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) DIAMETER 14,6 7 13 7 13 13 10 9 9 8 7 15, 13 9 8 14 14 7 8 6 8 7 10 8 8 7 6 7 7 8 8 6 9 10,6 7 6 6 18 6 17 8 19 17 8 11 6 16 16 11 16 19 SPECIES Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Ulmus americana Fraxinus pennsylvanica Ulmus americana Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acernegundo Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acer negundo Acer saccharinum Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Ulmus americana Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acernegundo Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acernegundo Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acernegundo Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acernegundo Fraxinus pennsy/vanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acernegundo Acernegundo Acernegundo Quercus ellipsoidalis Quercus ellipsoidalis Quercus ellipsoidalis /j1 TREE NUMBER COMMON NAME 631 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 632 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 633 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 634 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 635 Green Ash 636 Green Ash 637 Green Ash 638 Green Ash 639 Green Ash 640 Green Ash 641 Green Ash 642 Green Ash 643 Green Ash 644 Green Ash 645 Green Ash 646 Green Ash 647 Green Ash 648 Green Ash 649 Green Ash 650 Boxelder 651 Green Ash 652 Green Ash 653 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 654 Boxelder 655 Quaking Aspen 656 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 657 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 658 Green Ash 659 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 660 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 661 Green Ash 662 Quaking Aspen 663 Quaking Aspen 664 Quaking Aspen 665 Quaking Aspen 666 Quaking Aspen 667 Quaking Aspen 668 Quaking Aspen 669 Quaking Aspen 670 Quaking Aspen 671 Quaking Aspen 672 Quaking Aspen 673 Quaking Aspen 674 Quaking Aspen 675 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 676 Quaking Aspen 677 Quaking Aspen 678 Quaking Aspen 679 Boxelder 680 Boxelder DIAMETER 6 7 34 9 7 7 9 10 9 9 9 6 8 6 8 10,7,7 8 11 9 6 14 14 7 7 9 8 6 9 7 17 10 9 10 6 9 11 12 10 9 6 10 10 11 9 9 8 9 7 8 8,7,6 SPECIES Quercus ellipsoidalis Quercus ellipsoidalis Quercus ellipsoidalis Quercus ellipsoidalis Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acer negundo Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Quercus ellipsoidalis Acer negundo Populus tremuloides Quercus ellipsoidalis Quercus ellipsoidalis Fraxinus pennsylvanica Quercus ellipsoidalis Quercus ellipsoidal is Fraxinus pennsylvanica Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremulciides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Quercus ellipsoidal is Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Acer negundo Acer negundo 4f TREE NUMBER COMMON NAME 681 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 682 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 683 Boxelder 684 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 685 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 686 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 687 Green Ash 688 American elm 689 Green Ash 690 Green Ash 691 Green Ash 692 Green Ash 693 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 694 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 695 Boxelder 696 Boxelder 697 Green Ash 698 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 699 Boxelder 700 Boxelder 701 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 702 Northern Pin Oak (Red Oak) 703 Green Ash 704 Boxelder 705 Green Ash 706 Boxelder 707 American elm 708 Hackberry 709 Boxelder 710 Green Ash 711 Green Ash 712 Green Ash 713 Green Ash 714 Green Ash 715 Green Ash 716 Green Ash 717 Green Ash 718 Cottonwood 719 Cottonwood 720 Cottonwood 721 Green Ash 722 Black Willow 723 Cottonwood 724 Green Ash 725 Green Ash 726 Green Ash 727 Green Ash 728 Green Ash 729 Green Ash 730 Green Ash DIAMETER 12, 10, 6 7 6 8 13 15 12 7 15 14 11 12 6 22,14, 10 9 8 7 6 7 7 11 16 11 12 8 13 16 14 13 6 12 14 12 16 7 7 7 6 8 18 7 9 15 8 6 6 6 7 8 8, 8 SPECIES Quercus ellipsoidalis Quercus ellipsoidalis Acernegundo Quercus ellipsoidalis Quercus ellipsoidalis Quercus ellipsoidalis Fraxinus pennsylvanica Ulmus americana Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Quercus ellipsoidalis Quercus ellipsoidalis Acer negundo Acernegundo Fraxinus pennsylvanica Quercus ellipsoidalis Acer negundo Acernegundo Quercus ellipsoidalis Quercus ellipsoidalis Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acer negundo Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acer negundo Ulmus americana Celtis occidental is Acernegundo Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Fraxinus pennsylvanica Salix Spp. Populus tremuloides Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica "9 TREE NUMBER COMMON NAME 731 Green Ash 732 Green Ash 733 Boxelder 734 Boxelder 735 Green Ash 736 Green Ash 737 Black Willow 738 Green Ash 739 Green Ash 740 Cottonwood 741 Cottonwood 742 Cottonwood 743 Cottonwood 744 Cottonwood 745 Cottonwood 746 Cottonwood 747 Cottonwood 748 White Spruce 749 White Spruce 750 Paper Birch 751 Silver Maple 752 Cottonwood 753 Cottonwood 754 Boxelder 755 Boxelder 756 Cottonwood 757 Bitternut Hickory 758 Bitternut Hickory 759 Bitternut Hickory 760 Bitternut Hickory 761 Bitternut Hickory 762 Hackberry 763 Bitternut Hickory 764 Boxelder 765 Boxelder 766 Boxelder 767 Silver Maple 768 Cottonwood 769 Boxelder 770 Boxelder 771 Cottonwood 772 Cottonwood 773 Cottonwood 774 Cottonwood 775 Cottonwood 776 Cottonwood 777 Cottonwood 778 Boxelder 779 Cottonwood 780 Cottonwood DIAMETER 7 9 7 7, 7 6 8 10 9 8 17 19 13 13 14 27 24 25 14 12 9, 8, 8 21 25 11 7, 7 8 16 16 6 8, 8 7, 7 12 14,6,6 11 8 7 6 10 10 6 6 9 7 17 11 12 8 11 6 26 9 SPECIES Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acernegundo Acernegundo Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Salix Spp. Fraxinus pennsylvanica Fraxinus pennsylvanica Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Picea glauca Picea glauca Betula papyrifera Acer saccharinum Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Acer negundo Acer negundo Populus tremuloides Carya cordiformis Carya cordiformis Carya cordiformis Carya cordiformis Carya cordiformis Celtis occidental is Carya cordiformis Acer negundo Acernegundo Acer negundo Acer saccharinum Populus tremuloides Acer negundo Acernegundo Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Acer negundo Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides ~ TREE NUMBER COMMON NAME 781 American elm 782 Cottonwood 783 Cottonwood 784 American elm 785 Green Ash 786 Green Ash 787 Green Ash 788 Boxelder 789 Green Ash 790 Green Ash 791 Green Ash 792 Green Ash 793 Green Ash 794 Boxelder 795 Green Ash 796 Green Ash 797 Silver Maple 798 Green Ash 799 Green Ash 800 Boxelder 801 Silver Maple 802 Boxelder 803 Green Ash 804 American elm 805 Boxelder 806 Cottonwood 807 Green Ash 808 Green Ash 809 Green Ash 810 Green Ash 811 Green Ash 812 Green Ash 813 Green Ash 814 Ironwood 815 Ironwood 816 Green Ash 817 Green Ash 818 Basswood 819 American elm 820 Bitternut Hickory 821 Basswood 822 Green Ash 823 Basswood 824 Bitternut Hickory 825 Siberian Elm 826 Basswood DIAMETER SPECIES 7 Ulmus americana 24 Populus tremuloides 11 Populus tremuloides 8 Ulmus americana 13 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 7 Acernegundo 11 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 16 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 7 Acernegundo 13 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 12 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 7,6 Acer saccharinum 10 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 6 Acer negundo 17 Acer saccharinum 21 Acernegundo 14 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 7 Ulmus americana 14 Acernegundo 22 Populus deltoides 10 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 13 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 14 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 12 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 12 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 6 Ostrya virginiana 6 Ostrya virginiana 10 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 8 Tilia americana 15 Ulmus americana 7 Carya cordiformis 13 Tilia americana 11 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 14 Tilia americana 9 Carya cordiformis 10 Ulmus pulma 11,11,10,10,8,7 Tilia americana $/ tervi[[e if.sta6{isfUti 1857 1880 9dain Street . Centeroilfe,:M:N 55038 (651) 429-3232 . Pa:{(651) 429-8629 aIT OF CENTERVILLE APPLICATIONFORPRELIMINARYPLt\~ P #/M~QP/~ IPlJ ~ of ~ ~<L-:r " \II I ,(.IV ,-- AnY,addi~onal costs incurrt:d fo~ DATE PAID: Il'7/01o FE .1'~,C9 + Engineenng, legalfess, publication or . 7 ~VI1,'1/J wl."r~ts, ~F (J(}s6s- e.J/ued STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY: ~ d~~:;,..J- w.k LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: ~ A ~11 dUlJ ey,'&'''''5,(, SIZE OF PARCEL (S): ~ q . <.(Q ,.,..f PROPERTY OWNER:-Se..~ aN l...aua-\\Qi\2!lUHONE #: u,1 g. -750 -14'1;)- FEE OWNER: 5~ CQl\ ~Cl'\U;> ADDRESS: 1!T61 Old fr\]OfL ~oCLC\ Ctln~cJ~ I\e mf\ "55038 APPLICANTS INTEREST IN PROPERTY: .,,/ FEE OWNER LEASE HOLDER DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: .L o-\- c:~ \r\' CONTRACT PURCHASER OPTION TO PURCHASE REASON FOR REQUEST: R\~-\- o...~ ~('cruo.-e.... By paying the above slali:d fee, I wllk:rstand Iha1 n outcome i~ denial. ,1 , / ~ . ~g~a~! of AppliCant,' ,~ ~ ///C:? 7)) Date' ~1~~ ~L EXHIBlT-A- Legal Description File No. 4-34578 Parcel 1 : Aft of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 48. files of the Registrar of TItles, Anoka County, Minnesota, Except the North 299 feet thereof. Parcel 2: Outlot A, Acorn Creek Second Addition. Parcel 3: That part of Government Lot 3, Section 1~ Townstip 31 North, Range 22 West, Anoka County. Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the most westerty comer of Tract A. Registered Land SUNey No. 48; thence On an aSSLDned bearing <<South 83 degrees 18 minutes 00 seconds East along the southerfy line of said Tract A a distance of 355.00 feet to an angle point in said southerly line and the point of beginning of the property to be described; thence South 42 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds East along said southerty line a distance of 340.00 feet to the westerly line of said Tract A; thence South 00 degrees !to minutes 00 seconds West along said westerly line a distance of 52.00 feet to the easterty extension 01 the northerly line of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 48; thence North 89 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds West along said north line and its easterfy extension a distance of 108.50 feet; thence northwesterly n.ss feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the southwest with a chord bearing of North 60 degrees 19 minutes 08 seconds West, a radius of SO. 00 feet and an included angle of 83 degrees 15 minutes 51 seconds to a point of reverse curvalure; thence westerly 89.84 feet along a reverse curve concave to the north with ill radius of 100.00 feet and a centraf angle of 40 degrees 00 minutes 50 seconds; thence North 61 degrees 56 minutes 13 seconds West tangent to the previously described curve a distance of 90.93 feet; Chene. westerly 41.87 feet afong a tangentiaf curve concave to the south with a radius of 55.00 feet and an included angle of 43 degrees 36 minutes 54 seconds; thence North 30 degrees 30 minutes 23 seconds East a distance of 246.91 feet to the point of beginning. ~ 1880 ;Main Street . Centen;i{[e, 'M'N 55038 'Esta6fisMd 1857 CITY OF CENTERVILLE (651) 429-3232 . Pa.:{ (651) 429-8629 APPUCATION FOR WT SPLITILOT COMBINATIONIREZONING rJ,SO.? Any additiooal costs incurred for LOT SPLITILOT COMBINATION: FEE: + engineering, legal fees, publication or other requirements REZONING: tL- DATE PAID: STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 7.381 ~/D M\U n& LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: ~e ~ v\~~~). . tervi{{e SIZEOFPARCEL(S): I. ~OAe.Rt;5 {~ :J.,~ Af!KGS PROPERTY OWNER:~ /fAfVZAt.-- PHONE #: 61:A.' 7<>0 -14t./~ ~D~~R: 7?Jf~~, t ~((rr(-J~~ APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY: L FEE OWNER LEASE HOLDER CONTRACT PURCHASER OPTION TO PURCHASE ~SCRIPTlONOFtf:QUE~: ~ 6:t.~ ~ ;7:"" ~-S.Jn -;). 2.t- ~t' r ~ 3 'f' 'f ~ :z.-:J.. f"mrn -I ~ -~ REASON FOR REQUEST: Ln+ cpl i 1- Date .5f Welcome iD iho Web _ of Anoka County um..- Property Account Summary Icun-ent General Information Property 10 14-31-22-42-0036 Situs Address UNASSIGNED SITUS, CENTERVllLE, MN 55038-0000 Property Oescrl ption OUTlOT A ACORN CREEK 2ND ADO last Sale Price 134.00 Last Sale Date 06/02/2004 Last Sale Document Type WDEE WARRANlY DEED I Unked Property Group Position 20f3 Click for Linked Details Status Active , AbstractjTorrens ~stract Name HANZAl JEFFERY J 8< LAURA J ---CUment Recording Process Date. Abstract Documents Have Been Recorded Through Abstract O~~~ Have Been_~~r.:~_hro':l.~_._______ Torrens Documents Have Been Recorded Through Torrens Documents Have Been Mailed Through ~ctIve Certi1lcates Of Title IType ----rc;rtificate Number 1 No Certificates Found 11/09/2006 11/.!8/20<!~ 11/03/2006 11/03/2006 ~ I -..J ICertlficate Date ocum~ecorded Within 30 Da . Of "Recorded Throu h" Dates Above -J Type Abstract/Torrens Recorded Number Recorded Date 1 No Documents Found I ,!E~_~~_ ________ __~~130*9~~~~___ ______J * Lot Size: Approximate lot size In feet. clockwise beginning with the direction the lot faces '-iX District Information j aty ~ame .___. I CENTERVllLE =.j School District Number and Name ~NTENNIAl SCHOOL DISTRiCT # 12 ~roperty Classification ~ Tax Year Classification 2006 lA-Residential Homestead 200S lA-Residential Homestead ProDertY vallie. _._-"-- - Tax Year Description Amount 2007 Est Market Land (MKlND) 100 2007 Est Mar1<et (MKITL) 100~ 2006 Est Mar1<et (MKTTL) 1001 2006 Taxable Market (TM1V) 1001 rax Amounts for M1PR I https://prtinfo.co.anoka.mn.us/(wsrdcq45twv521bgdkdnd255)/search.aspx Page 1 of2 11/28/2006 ~ Tax Year Description Amount 2006 Qualifying Tax Amount (Tax Bill line 1) 1.47 2006 Prior Year QualifyIng Tax Amount (Tax Bill line 2) 1.33 2006 Total Tax Amounts - Before Payments 1.47 2006 Special Assessments (Included In Total) 0.00 Payment History for Past Three Years Date Paid Tax Year Principal Interests, Penalties and Costs Amount Paid 11/27/2006 2006 1.47 0.11 1.58 07/12/2005 2005 1.33 0.07 1.40 05/15/2004 2004 1.37 0.03 1.40 No Charges are currently due. Oeveloped by A5IX, Incorporated. @2004 All rights reserved. Version 1.0.2462.16771 https://prtinro.co.anoka.mn.us/(wsrdcq45twv52Ibgdkdnd255)/search.aspx Page 2of2 11128/2006 .5t Page 1 of2 W~IoIboW" wof Anoka C2!!ty Property Account Summary 14-31-22-31-0022 . "------- UNASSI~NEO SITUS, CENTERVlLLE. MN 55038-0000 THAT PItT OF GOVT LOT 3 see 14 TWP 31 RGE 22 DESC 1\5 FOL: COM AT MOST WLY COR OF TRACT A IREG LAND SURVEY NO 48, TH S 83 DEG 18 MIN E, ASSD BRG, ALG SLY UNf OF SO TRACT A 355 FT TO IAN .liNG PT IN SO SLYUNE So POB TH S 42 OEG 10 MIN E I\LG SO SLY UNE 340 FT TO WLY UNE OF SO , TRACT A. TH S 0 DEG 50 MIN W ALG SO WLY UNE 52 FT TO EL Y EXTN OF NL Y UNE OF TRACT B REG I ,Property lLANO SURVEY NO 48, TH N 89 DEG 10 MINW ALG SO N UNE,. ITS ELY EXTN 106.50 FT, TH NWLY 72.66 I 1FT ALG A NON TAN CUR CONC TO SW WITH A CHORD BRG OF N 60 DEG 19 MIN 08 SEC W A RAO OF 50 l'Oe5crIPtlon FT & AN INCWoEo ANG OF 83 oEG 15 MIN 51 SEC TO A PT OF REVERSE CURVATURE, TH WLY 69.84 FT ALG A REVERSE CUR CONe TO N WITH A RAD OF 100 FT & A CEN ANG OF 40 DEG 50 SEC, TH N 61 DEG 56 MIN 13 SEe W TAN TO LAST DESe CUR 90.93 FT, TH WLY 41.87 FT AlG A TANCUR CONC TO S WITH lA RAD OF 55 FT &; AN INCLUDED ANG OF 43 DEG 36 MIN 54 SEe, TH N 30 OEG 30 MIN 23 SEe E 246.91 ~ TO ~B, AKA PR"!..9F LOT S REV AVO SUB NO 47 SUB] TO EASE OF REC _.___~__ Last Sale Price 7,493.00 I Last Sale Date 06/02/200~ (Last Sale WOEE WARRANTY DEED Document Type I Unked Pro'p~rty ~ Click for Linked Details :Group PosItion ,3 of 3 ~tatus -=JActive ,Abstract!Torrens [Abstract 1 I -----------J i , I!".!~.----.-l.-._.-----.-----.-.---.----------. t:~er !~~~;AL JEFFERY J & LAURA J iD~ent Rec:ordJ.!!LProc:ess Dates ~stract Docum~~ Have Been Recorded Through Abstract Documents Have Been Mailed Through ,Torrens Documents Have Been Recorded Through ~ns Documents Have Been Mailed Through ~ctlYe Certificates Of Title ,Type !Certificate Number INo Certificates Found ! ----------..------.--.----.- --1 --j ----:=1 --rll/09/2006 --J 11/08/2006 ) _ 11/03/2006 ---J 111/03/2006 , -_____-....~____J Documenta Recorded Within 30 Day. Of "Recorded Through" Date. Above Type IAbstract/Torrens IRecorded Number No Documents Found IRecorded Date \ I , _______J ~ I !Certlflcate Date BfOPerty Characteristics Tot/II Acres 11.20 · lot Size: Approximate lot size in feet, clockwise beginning with the direction the lot faces tTax District Information aty Name ) CENTERVlUE School District Number and Name leENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT #12 lProDertv Classification Tax Year Classification -- 2006 lA-Residential Homestead 2005 lA-Residential Homestead https://prtinfo.co.anoka.mn.us/(tbo5gqjbxoOfrwrb5rwbpoq2)/search.aspx 11/28/2006 51 Page 2 of2 , !Propertv Values !Tax Year Description Amount 2007 Est Market Land (MKLND) 5,600 2007 Est Market (MKITL) 5,600 2006 Est Market (MKTTL) 5,600 2006 Taxable Market (TMTV) I 5,600 Iax Amounts for M1PR Tax Year Description Amou nt 2006 Qualifying Tax Amount {Tax Bill Line 1) 82.00 2006 Prior Year Qualifying Tax Amount (Tax Bill Line 2) 74.80 2006 Total Tax Amounts. Before Payments 82.00 2006 Special Assessments (Included in Total) 0.00 Payment History for Past Three Years Date Paid Tax Year Principal Interests, Penalties Imd Costs Amount Paid 11/2712006 2006 82.00 5.74 87.74 07/1212005 2005 74.80 1.87 76.67 05/15/2004 2004 76.141 1.52 77.66 No Charges are currently due./ Developed by ASIX, Incorporated. @2004 All rights reserved. Version 1.0.2462.16771 https://prtinfo.co.anoka.mn.us/(tbo5gqjbxoOfrwrb5rwbpoq2)/search.aspx 11/28/2006 9 tenJilfe XsuJfli.stitlf )$5i PETITION FOR VARIANCE 25b.l!.~ Date: '\1 b1la Jo it, Fee: $ + Legal Fees Zoning: Applicant: -S~ ~ Q()~ Ln vf'CL \-\Ct O-z.CLL Street Address: 7 ~ ~ ) () ) d (Yl ;.P ~ (lDQ rh Phone: {P5/- /o...~.~ -:;)0 d. 0 City/State/Zip: C e~uIU-L V\'\() SSo3g Status of Applicant: Owner V- Lease Holder _ Other Legal Description of Property: <s 0 0 A ~a. du...A Street Address (subject property): 7'Xl f'l'WL Q J') cJocru-e. Description of Request: +r-Df'I-\- 3P\- \n ('.'(. l h)1 'I n/ntD _ ~ f) 1.(')t-.l:F L.., ?b -4 h-oW' ..-:~~~ ~"; nA- 35" ~f L,,,e.. R~n for Request: E."X .. .. .. Co. ( C. ~ \l. t:..) ~o_ ~-<' ~ ~(~\S A variance is a use that is not generally permitted by the City's zoning ordinances but which is allowed in special cases only. A request for a variance from the City's zoning ordinances will be granted upon a showing of undue hardship by a property owner who is determined to have a unique situation. "Undue hardship" means that the property cannot be put to a reasonable use if the conditions of the zoning ordinances are followed, that the property owner's particular circumstances are unique and not self-created, and that granting a variance will not alter the essential character of the locality or neighborhood. Economic hardship alone will not constitute undue hardship if some reasonable use currently exists under the terms of the City's zoning ordinance. If the property owner purchased the property knowing that the City's zoning ordinances prohibited a use, the property owner's circumstances are self-created. Minnesota Statutes (MS 462.357, Subd. 6) and City Code 154, Section 154.310 require that the following conditions must be satisfied for approval of this request. Please respond to these conditions using additional sheets of paper if necessary. 1. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the parcel or Jot, the proposed variance would relieve an undue hardship, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, should the applicable ordinance be strictly enforced. 2. The purpose of tbe proposed variance is not based. eXClusively upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but would correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. -- 1tJ '.-J 7 3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by the City Ordinance and has not been created by any persons presently having an interest in the parcel of land. 4. The variance win Dot adversely affect public health. welfare and safety and will oot be detrimental or iojurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood. 5. Variances will oot be granted that allow a use tbat is otherwise not a permitted use in the zoning district that the subject property is locat ./ Signature of Applicant: .By paying the above slated ti I ..' ' though the outoome of Council'" '15 denial APPLICANTS, PLEAsE NOTE: All developers or property owners must submit the following infonnation to the City of Centerville by the Tuesday that is 30 days PRIOR to the meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission or the City Council meeting at which the request will be heard at a public hearing. 1. Complete the application for the specific request and pay the fee. 2. Submit a complete survey and site plans (including measurements, dimensions), showing lot lines and building footprint, driveways, sidewalks, cwb cuts, ingress, egress, etc, on tbe property and its relation to adjacent properties. 3. Explanation of materials that will be used and plans for screening, landscaping, fencing and dumpster enclosures. 4. Drawings of completed buildings, if appropriate to the project, and materials used. 5. Stonn water retention and drainage plans. The Rice Creek Watershed District and/or other water management organizations may need to be notified of the project. 6. A Jetter explaining the reason for the variance request. The letter must also demonstrate the variance win not impact the surrounding properties nor impact the characteristic of the neighborhood in any manner. tJt; l .... ,,-..' ..- EXHIBIT -A- Legal Description File No. 4--34578 Parcel 1 : All of Tract A. Registered Land Survey No. 48, files of the Registrar of Titles, Anoka County, Minnesota, Except the North 299 feet thereof. Parcel 2: Outlot A, Acorn Creek Second Addition. Parcel 3: That part of Government Lot 3, Section 14, Townstip 31 Nolth, Range 22 West, Anaka County, Minnesota described as foUows: Commencing at the most westerly comer of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 48; !hence on an assumed bearing d South 83 degrees 18 minutes 00 seconds East along the southerly line of said Tract A a distance of 355.00 feet to an angle point in said southerty line and the point of beginning of the property to be described; thence South 42 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds East along said southerty line a distance of 340.00 feet to the westerly line of said Tract A; thence South 00 degrees 50 minutes 00 seconds West along said westerly line a distance of 52.00 feet to the easterly extension of the northerly line of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 48; thence North 19 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds West along said north line and its easterfy extension a distance of 106.50 feet; thence northwesterfy n.66 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the southwest with a chord bearing of North 60 degrees 19 minutes 08 seconds West, a radius of 50.00 feet and an included angle of 83 degrees 15 minutes 51 seconds to a point of reverse curvature; thence westerty 69.84 feet along a reverse curve concave to the north with a radius of 100.00 feet and il central angle of 40 degrees 00 minutes 50 seconds; thence North 61 degrees 58 minutes 13 seconds West tangent to the previously described curve a distance of 90.93 feet; thence westerty 41.87 feet along a tangential cUIVe concave to the south with a radius of 55.00 feet and an included angle of 43 degrees 36 minutes 54 seconds; thence North 30 degrees 30 minutes 23 seconds East a distance of 246.91 feet to the point of beginning. 61 ~ ~ ~G, ,~, ''''~~. ~ .- -i " " '-m 5' ~ /<(-:.. #,~;..,,:)(' ~~~.1':: ';:~~/,'~l ~';>;'<c :,,0" t~N;;~HI.AL LAKES Officer Jason Corlew Centennial Lakes Police Department 54 North Rd. Circle Pines MN 55014 763-784-2501 December 22, 2006 City Administrator Larson, During the tobacco sales compliance check that I recently conducted one of the businesses in your city that are licensed to sell tobacco failed the check. I directed an underage buyer into this business for the purposes of ensuring that the business is taking the appropriate measures to sell their tobacco products to adults. The business that failed the compliance check is listed below. Centermart 1801 Main St. The employee that sold the tobacco to the underage buyer was cited for the violation under state statue 609.685, this violation is a misdemeanor. I am advising you of the violation since this sale to the underage buyer may also be a violation of your city ordinance. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, 1~1Jw ~Or1ew #124 CLPD Alcohol and Tobacco Compliance Officer ~,l. tervi{{e 'Esta6{is/ied 1857 1880 'Main Street . Centervi[[e, 'M'N 55038 (651) 429-3232 . Pel:{ (651) 429-8629 January 5, 2007 Mr. Carl Buechler CenterMart 1801 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 Dear Mr. Buechler: Recently the Centennial Lakes Police Department conducted their state mandated tobacco sales compliance check. Records indicate that your business failed that check. The City is imposing its established fine of $250 for your 1st Violation. You have ten (10) days to pay the fine to the City or if you feel that you/your employee(s) have not failed this compliance check please contact me to arrange to appear before Council to commence the appeal process. I have enclosed a copy of City Code, Chapter 116 and correspondence from the Centennial Lakes Police Department dated December 22, 2006 for your review. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, fJ ~ D<tl~n City Administrator DLltb 63 tervi[[e 'Estabfishet{ 185'7 1880 :Main Street, Centervi[(e, :M'lV 55038 651-429-3232 or 'Fa:{ 651-429-8629 January 2,2007 Ms. Carolyn Smith Integrated Waste Management Department County of Anoka 2100 Third Avenue, Room 340 Anoka, MN 55303-2265 Re: Agreement for Use of SCORE funds Dear Ms. Smith: The City of Centerville tabled a decision on the Agreement for Residential Recycling Program at its last meeting. In the interim, the Council directed that I send a letter requesting that the County change its policies to allow some additional permitted uses for SCORE Funds. We are aware that Ramsey County allows SCORE Funding to be used toward the extra cost of purchase of recycled materials for public facilities, such as recycled planks for picnic tables. Centerville would like to see Anoka County adopt a similar policy. It might be reasonable to specify that a percentage, say 50% must be used for collection and advocacy and that the other 50% can be used for recycled materials alternatives. We believe that other communities would also welcome the change. Please let us know what the process is for the SCORE policies. Thank you. Yours truly, Dallas Larson, Administrator CC: Anoka County cities County Commissioners i.......'...,............'.................... ~'- ~-" -\ ;~(: " ~'- -, ~;~i: ' ~...., 1'-'"' ~ ~ v <';~ -', \~;Ji .i " i~;. ::::! "./;.f i-/'~ ~ -~~ t:-t ; ~~, rt~ '-' ~"'~ . .,' ..,,0" tf:~;E*':t<lIJ\1. LAKES Officer Matthew Langreck, Badge # 110 Centennial Lakes Police Department 54 North Road Circle Pines MN 55014 763-784-2501 December 27,2006 City of Centerville 1880 Main St Centerville MN 55038 City Administrator, During the alcohol compliance check that I conducted on December 19, 2006 all of the businesses in your city that are licensed to sell alcohol passed the check. I directed an underage buyer into these businesses for the purposes of ensuring that the businesses are taking the appropriate measures to sell their alcohol products to adults, Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Officer Matthew R Langreck RECEIVED DEe 2 8 2006 CENTERVILLE, MN . . C'!!0ml.Clty In November, 70 percent of California voters approved Proposition 83, which prohibits sex offenders ftom living within 2,000 feet of a park or school The law makes most of Los Angeles and San Francisco off-limits. 11!1, Lo Opposite: Sex offenders are put on notice outside a park in Franklin Township, New Jersey. ~ By Meghan Stromberg' American Planning Associarion 21 ~ked Up~ Then Locked Out Expert~ftj say residency re~.,trictiollS for se~r offerlders ma'y create 10.- more problems thall they solve. ~ ---- ames Hill was set to be released from prison in the summer of2005 and had arranged for post- incarceration housing at a mission. But on the day of his release, Hill (not his real name) learned from prison authorities that he wasn't allowed to live at the shelter. His choice was either to find appropriate housing or-be transferred to another prison until he could. "I'd already been in prison for 16 years; I didn't want to stay any longer," he said in a phone interview. That's when Hill's struggle to find a place to live began. His family's house was within 1,000 feet of a school, and a state law-passed after his conviction-prohibited Hill, a sex offender, from living there. He moved temporarily into an overpriced trailer in the middle of nowhere, he says, but his family eventually moved so that he could live with them. Shortly after moving in, his parole officer told him the new house was off- limirs because it was less than 1,000 feet from a playground. "But I knew enough about the planning office and GIS to ask a planner there to give me a reading," Hill says. It was 1,323 feet away, and he was allowed to stay. Hill's contact with the planning office was resourceful but not random after he received an undergraduate degree then worked with GIS, helping to digitize county maps. Hill says he's fortunate to have a supportive family. Even so, he says that laws that restrict where he can-and more precisely, cannot-live are unfair and ineffecrive. "Everywhere you turn there's a school or a park [going up.] It's a felony for me to live [near one]," he says. But is a convicted sex offender's challenge in finding housing a planning problem? "It's mosr definitely a planning issue," Hill adds. "What if I'd owned property before I went to prison?" Besides, he says, "my crime had nothing to do wirh where I live. Putting those restrictions on people like me doesn't help keep the community safer-in facr, they give people a false sense of security. " Hill was convicted of molesting a child in his family. Like him, the vast maj ority of sex offenders aren't strangers--experts say that 90 percent of rhem know their victims or are related to them. ''I'm not asking anyone to feel sorry for me. r did the crime and I'm paying the price, but I think [the government] crossed the line." 22 Planning January 2007 Yes in your backyard '.; oi It's difficult to feel sympathy for people like Hill, who have hurt children or sexually as- saulted adults. Highly publicized cases like that ofJessica Lunsford, a Florida girl who in 2005 was abducted, assaulted, and buried alive by a convicted sex offender, keep violent sex crimes in the news. While sexual abuse has dropped 40 percent in the last two decades, according to the U.S. Department of Justice, few jurisdictions are pre- pared when convicted sex offenders are released from prison and reenter the community. Twenty-one states and hundreds of munici- palities have passed laws restricting where sex offenders can live. Do they work? Do they make communities safer? Many places think so and are passing residency laws at a steady clip, in many cases competing to craft more restrictive laws than the next town over. Still, residency restrictions have their crit- ics. Making sections of a city uninhabitable to sex offenders greatly reduces offenders' access to housing, employment, transportation, and services. Those who treat sex offenders say that situation creates more problems: Without sup- port, stable housing, jobs, and access to treat- ment, sex offenders-and all criminals-are statistically more likely to commit new crimes. They are also more likely to go underground, making it impossible to monitor them. Released sex offenders live in every state. "We want to believe they are the few, the perverted, and the far away," says David D'Amora, a therapist who works with sex offenders in Con- necticut and chairs the public policy committee of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, based in Beaverton, Oregon. In fact, there are more than half a million registered sex offenders nationwide, with more than 100,000 in California alor;.e. How the laws have evolved Since 1994, sex offenders have been required to register with local authorities on a regular basis. The federal law passed that year, the Ja- cob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Act, '-"'1 is named after an l1-year-old Minnesota boy who was abducted and never found. While U.S. law compels sex offenders to register, state laws dictate how often and for how long; 11 states require lifetime registration. A 1996 amendment to the Jacob Wetterling Act, Megan's Law, added a community notifi- cation requirement, which also varies by state. Most states publish an online database of sex offenders' names, addresses, and convictions, whereas others leave it to local authorities to circulate information to nearby neighbors or schools. The law is named after the high-profile case of Megan Kanka, a seven-year-old New Jersey girl who was raped and killed by a known sex offender who had moved in across the street from her family. With Megan's Law, "we created an opportu- nityfor the public to know where sex offenders live," says Suzanne Brown-McBride, a victims advocate and executive director of CALCASA, the California Coalition Against Sexual Assault. She notes that no otherdassofcriminals, includ- ing murderers, is similarly monitored. Group Homes Still Struggle to Fit In The family that lives at 61 st Street and San Pablo Avenue in Oakland, California, is unusually large. Its household members occupy some 21 beds in a two-story Victorian house across from a school. The family is disciplined-breakfast is at 7:30 sharp, lunch at 1 :30-and it's also friendly, with someone almost always on the front stoop to greet passersby. But under many city codes this household would not qualify as a family. After all, its members are not related by blood, but rather by a common goal: to overcome the obstacles created by mental illness and substance abuse so that they can function in society. The house is a group home called Morning Star Villa. Group homes, ranging from a few beds to a couple dozen, house those who, because of an addiction or a disability, can't otherwise live independently. Over the past few decades, more and more disabled people have left institutions and moved into small group living situations. Like most group homes, Morning Star Villa does share aspects ofa family, including mutual support, many long-term residents, and life skills education-"stuff to get them familiar with society," says administrator Anthony Piano. But group homes are a different animal: Drug dealers target them. Most residents need caseworkers. And the homes have unique real estate needs such as latge buildings and inex- pensive property. That's the dilemma for planners used to cut- and-dried land-use categories. The 1988 federal Fair HousingAmenclments Act classified people with disabilities as a protected class for which cities must make "a reasonable accommodation" in their zoning codes. A 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case upheld the FHAA's application to zoning. But nearly two decades after the FHM became law, local governments are still struggling with how to regulate group homes. "A lot more cities are allowing community residences as residential uses, but many are getting it wrong," says Daniel Lauber, AICP, a planner and attorney who specializes in com- munity residence regulation. "The FHAA left people very confused." Community integration Group homes are part of a larger category known as community residences, which also includes halfway houses, a more temporary type of group living situation. Community residences have existed in the U.S. since the 1880s, says Lauber, but until the 1960s most policies leaned toward institutionalization for people with disabilities. In the 1960s and 70s that changed, as parenrs of people wirh disabilities filed lawsuits seeking alternatives to institutions. "The key to all of this is community iutegra- tion," Lauber says, helping to "make people all they can be." However, local governments lagged in regulating the growing number of community residences. ~ I' I I "Group homes wete an anathema," says Martin Jaffe, an associate professor of urban planning and policy at the University of Illi- nois-Chicago. Generally, he says, group homes were regulated with conditional use permits. "It practically guaranteed everyone would show up to oppose them." Case law generally upheld those trying to keep group living situations out of single-fanlily residential areas. In 1974, in Belle Terre v. Boraas, the Supreme Court upheld a city's ordinance defining a family. The opinion stated that equal protection did not apply and that the courtS had no reason to interfere with a local jurisdiction's police power. In 1985's City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center decision, the Supreme Court acknowledged that the disabled received no special review. I But, says Brown-McBride, the registry stirs up all sortS of NIMBY issues, with opponents of this unwanted population mounting fierce, highly emotional arguments. ''As a consequence of these laws, no one wants to live by them," she says. "That's where it becomes a planning problem. From the outset, you've got compet- ing goals" -tracking where offenders live in the community, but also letting community members know where they are. Child safety zones and residency restrictions emerged in 2000, Brown-McBride says. "They followed the model of nuisance codes, places with drug-free and prostitute-free zones. Some states did it very narrowly-around schools and day care centers. Others made it almost impossible to live anywhere." Today's residency laws assume that reducing the likelihood of contact with children will reduce the chance of abuse. These "distance marker" laws typically prohibit known sex of- fenders from living-and sometimes working or loitering-within acenain distance of schools, day care centers, and "places where children congregate." They may also specifically include parks, certain public areas, churches, and school bus Stops. The least testrictive distance matker ordinances mandate a 500-foot buffer, but dis- tances of 1 ,000 and 2,500 feet are common. Several of the laws have withstood constitu- tional challenges. The most notable is in Iowa, where registered sex offenders are prohibited from living within 2,000 feet of a school, day care provider, or park. In 2005, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the state law as constitutional in Doe v. Miller, after a suit was brought by the ACLD. The coun concluded that the law did not amount to "punishment" and declared that the Constitution does not guarantee a "right to live where you choose." Critics have charged that residency laws amount to banishment. Courts have disagreed. Proponents of the laws argue that "if you draw circles around schools, there still may be pock- ets where sex offenders can live," says Stephen JohnsonGrove, an attorney with the Ohio Justice and Policy Center. He notes that the laws are made possible by technology used by planners American Planning Associa[ion 23 every day. "These laws exist only because GIS exists. There's no way they'd send a surveyor to evaluate every sex offender's living situation. But with GIS, it's easy to do." JohnsonGrove is working with sex offenders challenging Ohio's residency law, which went into effect in 2005. That state, as well as Ken- tucky, Georgia, and Oklahoma, has no provision for grandfathering in sex offenders who lived within a buffer zone when the law was passed. One client is 75 and has lived in his house for 35 years. He says that offenders in those situations "come to us because rheyare being thrown our. We're not challengingwherher rhey committed an offense or not, but [this] violates the ex post facto clause-you can'r impose punishment after the fact." Broad brush Some states and cities have opted not to pass residency laws. Covington, Kentucky, a Cincin- nati suburb, defeated such an ordinance in spring 2005. The proposed law would have created a 2,000-foot buffer (Kentucky's law is 1,000 feet). Fair housing rules The 1988 passage of the Fair Housing Amend- mems Act forced courts and local governments to treat the disabled differently. The law added the disabled to its existing list of protected classes. Under the act, the broad definition of "handicap" extends to alcohol or drug ad- diction. However, the law excludes residents "whose tenancy would constitute a direct threat to the health and safety of other individuals." The Kansas supreme court ruled lasr April that Leavenworth County, near Kansas City, could prohibit the operation ofa group home for high- risk sex offenders who are elderly and disabled (News, August/September 2006). The FHAA also required that cities whose zoning law did notlimit the number of unrelated people that could live in a single-family residence The Gosser Care Home, a six-bed group home for the mentally ill, is located on a cul-de-sac in a residential neighborhood of Milpitas, California. allow group homes as-of-right. It required those with more restrictive definitions of fam- ily to make "reasonable accommodations" for homes housing the disabled. Seven years larer, in Edmonds v. OxfordHouse, the Supreme Court upheld the FHAA and established that local laws that define families in a way that excludes group homes are nor exempt from the law. Experts like Lauber say the government had good reason to force cities to approach commu- nity residences more like families and less like institutions. He cites over 100 studies that show that community residences have little impact on property values, as long as group homes are not clustered on one block. Jaffe points out that traffic and congestion, often a top concern of low-density neighborhoods, are also likely to have a minimal impact because few residents own vehicles. Many cities have stopped regulating group homes alrogether. "The pendulum swung way far the other way," says Eric King, the com- munity residential siting coordinator for the Portland, Oregon, Office of Neighborhood Involvement. King says Portland amended its code in the early 1990s to allow group homes in any residential district. "Things got sited anywhere, without any process," King says. As a result, new problems began to occur: The lack of regulations allowed providers to cluster homes in certain neighbor- hoods. Neighbors armed with negative stereo- types stormed city hall looking for recourse. Something similar was happening in Mil- waukee. Until this year, the city mandated that group homes must be at least 2,500 feet apart. As more and more community residences came into the city, that requirement was largely ignored. Alderman Joe Davis led an effort to map com- munity residences and found a disproportionate number of the facilities in his northwestern district. "Literally, one would be approved on one block and then another would apply for the same block," creating concerns among families about neighborhood instability, Davis says. Group home advocates are trying to abolish both the city law and a similar state statute. Portland's solution was the creation of the Community Residence Siting program, which applies couRict dispute tesolution tactics to group home sitings that stir discontent among neigh- bors. The program identifies community leaders and brings them together with care providers to map out a public involvement process, with the city office as a mediator. King says the mediation has paid off. "We don't have people screaming at elected officials anymore," he says. Jaffe, meanwhile, isn't afraid to say that the best place for many group homes, especially larger ones, may be in multifamily zones, where ameni- ties like shopping and transportation are more likely to be within easy walking distance. Tim Sullivan Sullivan is a freelance writer in Oakland, California. Alex Edmondson, a city commissioner, was an opponent, he says, because itwould have forced people to move. By drawing up maps of the city and overlaying school buffer zones, the city also found that most local sex offenders would be concentrated in one tesidential area. Colorado and Minnesota chose nor to enact residency laws after commissioning studies of the regulations' effectiveness. In Colorado, research showed that second-time offenders did not live any closer to a school than those who did not reoffend. Both states' studies noted that residency restrictions tended to isolate offenders, driving them into rural places, or areas lacking jobs, transportation, arid treatment providers. They found that the laws significantly reduced offenders' access to affordable housing. Sex offender residency laws sound good in theory, says Jill Levenson, a researcher at Lynn University in Boca Raton, Florida, who is considered an expert on the topic. "They grow out of fear, out of anger at an abhorrent criminal-often a [person who has hurr] a child. The media perpetuates this perception that all offenders reoffend, that treatment doesn't help, and that [these people have] fixed and unchangeable characteristics." She goes on to say that there is no doubt that some sex offenders are highly dangerous and likely to commit more crimes, but notes that sex offenders are actually a heterogeneous group. "Residency laws tend to be overly inclusive. When we lump [all sex offenders] together, it dilutes the ability of the public to tell who is truly a risk," she says. Laws should target supervision and management pertinent to an individual's offense pattern, she adds. What is the recidivism rate among sex of- . States with residency laws States without residency laws fenders? A 2004 study by Andrew Harris and Karl Hanson of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada, a government agency, notes that the question is not easily answered because the offenders-their age, sex, previous criminal history, relationship to the victims- vary greatly. The age and sex of victims and the types of crimes are also factors. Using data from 10 follow-up studies of adult male offenders, Harris and Hanson's study found that most did nor commit new sex crimes. First-time offenders are less likely to reoffend than those with previous sexual convictions and younger offenders are more likely to commit new offenses. The likelihood of recidivism decreases the longer a convicted offender lives in the com- munity. Fifteen years following an offender's release, 13 percent of incestuous child molesters commit new sex crimes (six percent of them in the first five years). Among molesters with girl victims, 16 percent reoffend within 15 years. Among those with boy victims, that figure is 35 percent (23 percent in the first five years). 'Stranger danger' The most glaring mismatch between broad distance marker laws that prohibit sex offenders from being near schools is the fact that very few children are actually snatched from schools-or anywhere else-and assaulted by strangers. Ac- cording to the U.S. Bureau ofJustice, just over 90 percent of all sex crimes against children are committed by a family member or an acquain- tance. (In cases of assault against adults, that number is lower-70 to 75 percent.) "It's the stranger offenses that seem to be the motivation for the legislation, yet the majority Sex Offenders by State Ala. 5,193 Mont. 1,495 Alaska 4,219 Neb. 2,189 Ariz. 11,305 Nev. 5,573 Ark. 6,426 N.H. 3,250 Calif. 104,824' N.J. 11,003 Colo. 9,125 N.M. 1,915 Conn. 4,106 N.Y. 22,209 D.C. 641 N.C. 9,228 Del. 2,984 N.D. 946 Fla. 35,910 Ohio 3,750 Ga. 11,744 Okla. 5,118 Hawaii 2,170 Ore. 17,160 Idaho 2,801 Pa. 7,736 III. 17,890 R.1. 1,352 Ind. 8,500 S.C. 8,556 Iowa 6,058 S.D. 1,993 Kan. 3,981 Tenn. 8,561 Ky. 5,351 Texas 44,336 La. 6,921 Utah 6,904 Maine 1,670 Vt. 2,340 Md. 4,340 Va. 12,152 Mass. 8,104 Wash. 18,790 Mich. 38,032 W.va. 2,500 Minn. 13,885 Wis. 17,887 Miss. 3,689 Wyo. 981 Mo. 11,031 'Includes offenders who were incarcerated, deported, and from out of state. Source: Parents for Megan's Law, 2006 of offenses are perpetrated by offenders known to the victim," says Charles Onley, a research associate at the Center for Sex Offender Man- agement, a project supported by the Office of Justice Programs at the Department ofJustice. "The research is there. A lot of the residency restrictions are impacting people who perpe- trated these acts because they had access; they were in a position of trust and had fostered a relationship," he adds. David D'Amora also notes that national studies estimate that 85 percent of victims never report the crime. "A female or child is at a greater risk of being attacked by a never -arrested person than a convicted sex offender," he says. Of course, not all sex crimes involve children; 33 percent of victims of any type of sexual as- sault are over 18, according to the Bureau of Justice National Incidence-Based Reporting System. Yet, buffer laws do not protect places where potential adult victims congregate, nor do most differentiate between sex offenders who offend against children and those who assault adults. Unintended consequences Residency restrictions can do more harm than good, say some sexual abuse experts. "There are a number of unintended consequences to offenders that the public and politicians aren't all that sympathetic to," says Jill Levenson. Chief among them, as the Colorado and Min- nesota studies note, is offenders' limited access to affordable housing, and sometimes, housing of any kind. Depending how a city is laid out, a distance marker law can virtually exclude sex offenders. Proposition 83, a bill passed overwhelmingly I I I I j by California voters in November, increases the state's distance matket law, now prohibiting residences within 2,000 feet of a school. It also mandates longet sentences and tequites all sex offenders to be monitored with GPS. The law makes most of Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Diego, as well as the centtal areas of other cities, off-limits to sex offendets. The consequences of being zoned out of affotdable housing are thteefold, expetts say. Registeted sex offendets unable to find housing in the cities and suburbs are pushed into rural areas, where access to transportation and jobs may be scarce. Counselors and other treatment providers, as well as a reliable support group of peers and family, might also be out of reach. Yet, stable housing, employment, support, and treatment are all proven positive factors in the rehabilitation of offenders, Levenson says. The law also puts offenders at risk of be com- ing homeless. In October, an informal review of the Iowa Sex Offender Registry for Polk County, where Des Moines is located, showed that five of the 473 registered offenders listed their address as "homeless." Others claimed a motley assortment ofliving arrangements: 25 lived in motels, four at rest areas, and five in trucks, cars, or tents. Two offenders listed their address as "under Interstate btidge off northeast 14th Street." Offenders are also slipping off the law enforce- ment community's radar, making monitoring impossible. On Polk County'swebsite, more than 35 offenders' addresses simply read "whereabouts unknown," a registry category that is growing rapidly in Iowa. Last January, the Iowa County Attorneys As- sociation released a public statement denouncing the 2,000-foot ban. In addition to the objections mentioned above, it adds that law enforcement budgets are being strained by the laws without providing any "demonstrated protective effect." ~ ~ i J l ] 1 l H (' sou l' (' C S Reading. "The Impact of Residency Restrictions on Sex Offenders and Correctional Management Practices: A Literature Review" is a 2006 study prepared for the California Research Bureau. The 2004 study "Sex Offender Recidivism: A Simple Question" is available at www.psepc- sppcc.gc.caI publications/ corrections/200403- 2_e.asp. Online. The Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers is at www.atsa.com. The Center for Sex Offender Management: www.csom.org. The California Coalition Against Sexual Assault: www.calcasa.org. -- The statement also notes that rhe laws punish families of offenders, "whose lives are unfairly and unnecessarily disrupted by the restriction, causing children to be pulled out of school and away from friends, and causing spouses to lose jobs and community connections." What's a city to do? The political pressure to keep sex offenders away is intense, as Alex Edmondson, the Covington, Kentucky, commissioner who came out against a local law, can attest. On one residential street in Davenport, Iowa, a dozen sex offenders live in apartment buildings like this one. Detective Rich Tubbs says released offenders call the police lookingfor legal housing. In September, O'Fallon, Missouri, passed a law that surpasses the state law, creating a 2,000-foot buffer around day care centers and a 3,000-foot zone around schools, libraries, pools, and parks. Earlier that month in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, city council member Pierce Conley summed up the commonly held view among many politicians and citizens: "I just don't see why anyone would vote against it. It's kind oflike speaking against the flag, for God's sake." Now cities are competing to ~ake ever stricter regulations ensuring that sex offenders stay out of their town. Within less than a month of the approval of the O'Fallon law, another Charles County city, DardennePrairie, followed suit. Four other municipalities either have bills in the works or are considering drafting proposals, according to the Post-Dispatch. "From a victim's advocate point of view, it is not acceptable for one community to push out offenders and say, 'We're going to protect our kids but not yours,'" says CALCASA's Suzanne Brown-McBride. "What residency restrictions tend to do is make people pretend there's nowhere," she adds. "What planning forces you to do is find somewhere." Both Brown-McBride and her colleague, CALCASA director of public affairs Robert Coombs, say planners are an untapped American Planning Associarion 25 resource in the struggle to find housing situations that are suitable for offenders and acceptable to the community. "Planners are masterful at those conversations," says Coombs. "They understand community dynamics and the difficulty of put- ting in something that people dontwant." Plan- ners may also appreciate how good placement can actually enhance community safety. Brown-McBride advises thinking ahead, noting that it is easy to find information on the number oflocal sex offenders in prison and the length of their sentences. Group homes or other facilities can be planned, zoning can be changed to allow more flexible land uses, and community education can begin-long before a sex offender's imminent return sparks a crisis. She notes that planning and law enforcement can build stronger connections, perhaps by locating police substations in areas where housing for sex offenders is also planned. "In places where proactive planning has not happened, sex offenders and unwanted popu- lations of all kinds tend to go into places that are low-income, fragile, stressed," Brown-Mc- Bride says. She notes that some local planning efforts-such as a facility for sexually violent predators-are under way, but few broad initiatives exist. Brown- McBride goes so far as to suggest that zoning might be relaxed to allow sex offenders to live in a light industrial area rather than a residential zone. James Hill, the convicted sex offender familiar with GIS and planning issues, takes issue with that. "A light industrial area? That makes me not a person, but a thing. Does that make it easier for people? I find that appalling. " On the other hand, "is it better than not having a place at all? Well yes, of course it is," he admits. As a sex offender treatment provider, Da- vid D'Amora frequently works with victims' advocates, police and parole officers, and local governments to conduct community education sessions, both before a crisis happens and in the midst of one. He suggests a different approach. "Defining this as a criminal justice problem is a terrible mistake. This should be a public health issue," he says. "The problem with residency restrictions is that they almost always accomplish the oppo- site" of what they are intended to do, he adds. "Interventions like these actually increase risk. If we truly care about public safety, we need to understand that we've put policies in place that make communities less safe." Meghan Stromberg is Planning's senior editor. , M^Sc. January 3, 2007 TO: Centerville City Council Mary Capta, Mayor Thomas Lee Richard Terway Michelle Lakso Jeff Paar Dallas Larson, City Administrator FR: Tom Duffy, Chair Paul D. Erickson, Executive Director Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission RE: INVITATION TO PARTICIPATE IN RIBBON CUTTING Friday, January 19, 2007@4:30 pm (arrive by 4:15 pm) You are invited to participate as an official ribbon cutter in the opening ceremony of the Schwan Super Rink Expansion on Friday, January 19 at 4:30 pm (see attached press release). Your names'- will be listed on the dedication plaque (see attached draft) which will be mounted at the entrance. Please park in the main lot in front of the original Super Rink (see attached map) and proceed through the original Super Rink to the expansion. Governor Pawlenty will be participating in the ceremony. It is our goal to take a large group photo with all organizations. We will also stage individual photos with the Governor and your delegation. Please have your City Administrator RSVP the names of attendees and verify the correct spellings of your names on the plaque by Friday, January 12, 2007 to Lynda Lynda at llynch@mnsports.org. MINNESOTA.AMATEUFl$~()F1T$qQ~M!$_$l9f:( .. ~ ~-~1700 1 05th~A~en~e NE:Bia;;';;:~Mi~~'~~ot; 5544?;45iio -: i6:i-i8~56:JO".- ra; 763'-785-5699 . tdd 80~27-3529 toll free 800-500-8766. e-mail masc@citilink.com . www.masc.state.mn.us An Equal Opportunity Employer f NEWS RELEASE For immediate release, December 24,2006 For more information: Barclay Kruse, NSC Media Director 763.785.5634 (office) 763.458.6615 (cell) bkruse@mnsports.org Skip Peltier, Executive Director Herb Brooks Foundation 651.226.7171 skippeltier@gmail.com Pete Carlson, Schwan Super Rink Ice Operations Director 763.717.3881 (office) 763.458.6630 (cell) pcarlson@superrink.org Dedication of expanded Schwan Super Rink and opening of new Herb Brooks Center scheduled for Friday, January 19, 2007 Public is invited to ceremonies at the National Sports Center in Blaine Blaine, Minn. (December 15,2006) - The National Sports Center (NSC) announced that the official dedication of the newly expanded Schwan Super Rink will be held on Friday, January 19,2007. Two sheets of ice wer,e opened on October 1 and the final two sheets came on line on December 16. The addition ofthe four new rinks, called rinks 5-8, bring the Schwan Super Rink's capacity to eight sheets of ice in a single facility, making it the largest ice arena of its kind in the world. The Herb Brooks Training Center is a year-round state-of-the-art 12,500 square foot training center made possible by the work ofthe Herb Brooks Foundation and will utilize the Total Hockey Training System, featuring strength trainil).g and goaltending development. Here is the time schedule for the dedication ceremony: 4:30 pm: Ribbon-cutting ceremony at the Herb Brooks Training Center, adjacent to the Herb Brooks Rink (rink #6). 5:00 - 6:00 pm: Tours, refreshments, figure skating exhibition, Bethel University Rink (rink #5). Book signing by Ross Bernstein, author of America's Coach. 6:00 -7:00 pm: Free public skating, Herb Brooks Rink. 7:00 - 9:30 pm: Bethel vs. St. John's men's college hockey game, Rink #5. The public is encouraged to attend. . The new sheets of ice are part of a 128,000-square-foot four-hockey rink addition, which brings the size of the facility to 300,000 square feet. The addition was designed by Rozeboom Miller Architects and constructed by Kraus-Anderson Construction Company. The four new sheets are NHL-size ice. The original Schwan Super Rink, which opened in 1998, featured four Olympic-size rinks. In addition to the skating surfaces, the arena offers the Herb Brooks Center training facility, a figure skating training room, the Hat Trick Cafe, and 32 locker rooms. From ground breaking to opening, the new arena was built in just over a year. Construction began in early December of2005. . "The new Herb Books Training Center is dedicated to hockey players to help move their game from good to great and develop a lifetime love for the game," said Skip Peltier, Executive Director of The Herb Brooks Foundation. "We are carrying forward Herbie's beliefs, vision, and commitment to better the game of hockey. The Herb Brooks Training Center is the first part of a $7 million multi-phase commitment by the Foundation and was designed as a part of "The Four Pillars of Program Development & Training:" dryland training, on-ice training, character/leadership/officials training, and unstructured play in a 'pond-hockey' environment. "We are actively working with leading companies, former players and others to sponsor and bring to reality this commitment to better the game," said Peltier. "My dad loved the game of hockey and committed his life to making it better for all," said Dan Brooks, son of Herb Brooks and a member of the Foundation board. "Read his comments; they are what the Herb Brooks Foundation is committed to doing." "Herbie envisioned what is now the Herb Brooks Training Center when he first developed the original Super Rink plans in 1998, but the concept was cut off the final budget," said Dean Talafous Herb Brooks Training Center Program Director. "This training center, is just the kind of facility Herbie envisioned. Training programs for all ages and skill levels will be conducted both in the training center and on the ice year-round at the Schwan Super Rink". Well-known Minnesota sports author Ross Bernstein will sign copies of his new book, America's Coach. The book profiles the life of Herb Brooks and the leadership messages Brooks used in his career of coaching. Bernstein had been working with Brooks on writing a series of motivational books at the time of his passing in 2003, The new Schwan Super Rink addition was built without any money from the State of Minnesota. The proceeds from the sale of Columbia Arena were applied to the new construction. Building partners include Blaine, Centennial, Forest Lake and Tri-City Youth Hockey, Bethel University and'the Herb Brooks Foundation, who committed to be long-term tenants ofthe facility. This allowed Anoka County to sell construction bonds to finance the remainder of the construction costs, which will be paid for by ice-rental revenues. The cities of Blaine, Circle Pines, Centerville and Lino Lakes are also partners in the new expansion. ### "-I(.. 1-161t&.. 1\1& c:; NA T/ONAL SPORTS CENTER · Worlds Largest Athletic Complex 55 Fields · Schwan Super Rink Worlds Largest Ice Arena - 8 Rinks · Nations Best Youth Golf Course PGA TOUR Designed · Olympic Cycling Velodrome NATIONAL SPORTS CENTER 1700 105TH A VENUE NE BLAINE, MN 55449 763.785.5600 Schwan Super Rink Expansion Dedicated on January 19, 2007 State of Minnesota Tim Pawlenty, Governor Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission Tom Duffy, Chair; Howard "Chub" Stewart, Vice-Chair; Duane Arens, Anne Barry, Laura Brod, Walter Bush, Joel Carlson, Judy Frisch, Linda Goodno, Kristen Jacobs, Cal Larson, Dan Larson, Jim Metzen, Bob Milbert, Kenneth Resnick, Ann Rest, Alex Rowell, David Stead, Stuart Voigt, Andy Westerberg. Paul Erickson, Executive Director National Sports Center Foundation John Daniels, Chair; Paul Beggin, Dee Guthman, Ivar Sorenson, Phil V oxland. Kris Bjerkness, Executive Director Anoka County Commission Margaret Langfeld, Chair; Dennis Berg, Dan Erhart, Jim Kordiak, Dick Lang, Scott LeDoux, Rhonda Sivarajah. Jay McLinden, County Administrator Anoka County HRA Board Donald Findell, Paul McCarron, Bill Nelson. Blaine City Council Tom Ryan, Mayor; Mike Bourke, Dave Clark, Russ Herbst, Wes Hovland, Kathy Kolb, Dick Swanson. Ron Wood, City Manager Blaine Youth Hockey Association Circle Pines City Council David Bartholomay, Mayor; Dan Greensweig, David Kelso, Jenny Kromrey, Deb O'Brien. James Keinath, City Administrator Centerville City Council Mary Capra, Mayor; Michelle Lakso, Thomas Lee, JeffPaar, Richard Terway. . Dallas Larson, City Administrator Lino Lakes City Council John Bergeson, Mayor; Donna Carlson, Jeff O'Donnell, Jeff Reinert, Daniel Stoltz. Gordon Heitke, City Administrator Centennial Youth Hockey Association Herb Brooks Foundation Dan Brooks, Chair; Kelly Brooks Paradise, Bill Weller. Skip Peltier, Executive Director Forest Lake Youth Hockey Association The NSC Schwan Super Rink expansion was made possible by a cooperative effort between the State of Minnesota, Anoka County, and the cities of Blaine, Centerville, Circle Pines and Lino Lake, Herb Brooks Foundation, Tri-City Youth Hockey Association and Bethel University. Special Thanks to the ongoing generosity of the Schwan Food Company. L..taNislii'd IS:;;" CITY OF CENTERVILLE MONTHL Y ENGINEER'S REPORT For January 10, 2007 City Council Meeting tervi[{e Italics = New information. Normal = No change from last report. 1. Pheasant Marsh 3M Addition (000616-03134-0). The Contractor hasfinished the bituminous bike path and utility & street work for the season. The contractor has been given a punch list of items to complete and will continue to work on these items. 2. Hunters Crossing 3M Addition (000616-05141-0). All work has been completedfor the year. The Contractor will resume work in the spring. We are currently working on final quantities and record plans for the project. 3. 21st Avenue/Backage Road (000616-05143-0). All construction will resume in the spring to finish the project. We are currently preparing a punch list for the Contractor. The Backage Road will be blocked with barricades for the winter, but 2pt Ave. will be open to traffic. 4. CSAH 14 (000616-04139-0, 000616-06144-0, 000616-06150-0). Forcemain We have submitted plans, specs and bid items for inclusion in the 95% submittal. Water Main We have submitted plans, specs and bid items for inclusion in the 95% submittal. StreetscaDe We have submitted plans, specs and bid items for inclusion in the 95% submittal. 5. 2006 Storm Water Analysis (000616-06146-0). A final report will be sent to the Rice Creek Watershed District based on our meetings with them. We are inquiring about the possibility of constructing some of the Best Management Practices (rain gardens, vegetated swales, etc.) prior to our street reconstruction projects to avoid the affects of future rule changes. 6. Old Mill Road Improvements (000616-06147-0). We submitted a revised cost estimate to the City and Developer about a two weeks ago per the Council's request. 7. Fairview Street Improvements (000616-06148-0). We have provided the City with a feasibility estimate for the improvements so that staff may negotiate assessment waivers with the adjacent property owners. 8. Cedar Street Water Main (000616-06149-0). Final Record Plans were sent to the City. 9. Westview Water Main (000616-06151-0). Draft Record Plans were sent to the City for review and approval. 10. Block 7 Redevelopment Grading and Utility Improvements (000616-06152-0). All sewer and water has heen installed Mr. Mever did an outstandinv ioh vetfinv all the naner work together in time to secure financing. We will be discussing further improvements to Sorel Street in the near future. 11. Centerville Townoftice Park 2nd Addition (000616-06152-0). We reviewed the submitted site plan and preliminary plat and have offered our comments. Additionally, we have provided a planning review of the parking requirements, building height and landscaping requirements. 12. Hanzal's Addition (000616-06154-0). We reviewed the submitted grading plan and preliminary plat and have offered our comments. 13. Miscellaneous . We submitted a scope of services and engineering proposal for the production of a Downtown Redevelopment Comprehensive Infrastructure Plan. This would lay out, conceptually, the sewer, water, storm water, and street systems to allow continuity and reliability of theses systems as they are designed and constructed in phases. Included with this proposal is a separate estimate to complete an EA W if it is necessary. - End of memo- E co Q) J-~ Q).8 -~ - L.. .~ ~ Q)~ ....~ Cu Q)~ UB m (/) "E .... m O~ 00 L..r-.... .... 0 (/)~ Q) C o (C CeJI" ::::;!~ .~!~ t--.:~ cd~ ~ .... 3:f .+. c::: . .0 .:. CJ\ ~ ~ c.:.~RLri~ w.:.Q:;:.n~ Z; .:. ti' ~ :::: tl O.:.~~...i~ .., .:. ~ ~ ~ ..8 c::: ... lli.;.; u @ ro.:::!:u=J::l ~... !..cnl -. - 0..... ~ .:. 0 ~ E 6 .:. u e ... c::: 8 <. E .:. ,.... 'l:t" 0 z;.:. :::::O~ .- .+. ~'Il:t'''''' 8 ro.;.!!..,:ci~ &.:. ~:i!~ ~ -..-.. t F=:;;; Lri 0 c.:..!:!\D\O~ o'''a+!u~ .ID (. Ii = .8 IU .:. .= .g c: :::i .:. 0 ~ j; .+. ""C ... . c::: .!!:! u r-- {3 .~ e ~ "" .~ ~ ~ ~ ;::j~ ~.~ .t:i~ V)!l:j ~cs: ~ I- c::: .~~ 'tjro ;::).~ .t:ie ~~ c:sV) G - "" ~~ .~~ .~.~ ~~ ~~ ,...- - ~ .+. i r;; ~ o . "^ u i':'~~~ . ~(. ....,j-an~ Ul'>!l~::::tl ~.>~...;...;~~ -J+)lt:1n1t10 <>ll('~.o.o.<:l .!!!:::~ll~@i~ CD: = 0 3'" o~'t: - iii E .... 0 ;::! . h".,..,. ~ '0"'<1:.0<08 ::J.) ...~ ~ J:; ~ .:. ~..,:1Ii III .'. III ~ ..... II <>ll.;. s...;~.& iii .:. ::i U1 U1 @ J.-.:.~\O\Oc: fl.> "tJ.!ili QJ.:.~II:CE :2':':::!:i5~~ t:! ~ <( E 4J c: cu E.:. ::l g &.:.~~ "'! IV .:. Q.: ..,: g :ii .:+11:::' ~ tl ~'~~"';II '- +.+ 11'1 C .l!l.:.~.o.8 IV .:. .3 -H @ ~ .:. !! '5 E':' is = ~ lil E ~ (.1-- ~ l:! .0.... lLl..... 8 C:' ..... W.:. s::'NJ:; "C .:. !II ~ ~ - ...~!:: "c QJ. .... 0 ~ iL .:. III .c __ .'. <0 @ '-. .. .c:- 0.:. !::.!!!l! tl (. ~:iS E: 8,..:. Q:: ~8 .5 E' E .,.0 .... .:. 1--..... ~ 3:l.:.lLl~ 8 c: .:. Ii'.j- J:; .0..) ~~ ~ c:...~ .c w.;-SU::.8 5..:. VI ~ ~ .~- .:. ~ tl II .:. \i !! j' ...lii:-..c: . o~ .> ~:Rg ~ .:. "'" ~:::l ~ cu (. CI;..,: iii 8 ~<+~~::::.::o I-'- (. a...;"'; ~ .....:.Q::U1U10 QJ.,.~\O\O.o 1;; (. ~tJ.!!@ 3.) !!:iS~ .) is~~ .,..,.E .:.~0\~8 .;. CI; Ii: ~ 8 - (:. c:::....~ 1I\.b ~ .:. Q~"'" ~ E':'~...;~c~ ld<+eJU1U1.8 .'. .0 .0 @ rr:i.;. ~ 1l.!! Si ':'.!ll ~:iS.!!i .:. c~~ ~g h...... u <1:":8 ~.".. ... [i:i!li ~;;;~ t!~@ ~1l~ ~ III -> 0:1 B N....E IU .:. !: an 8 3 .:.!!.l~~ 0 OJ .:. C:--=t= an 0 .~.:.~~~u ~ .:. "'.....:i...t ~ cu':' ~U1U1.8 .c .:. ole .0 .0 t8J f.:. ~ti.!!~ a..:.~!!:iS'ii E... - 0 ~ o' o~ U - og .:+ :ri ~ .:. ~N 8 L.. .:. ~ an ... g. .:. Jl ~ li CU':'!ll...;!<___ C: .:. CI; U1 l:'i ::J(.~.o@ (j).:.~.!!~ .:. :is u ... o.!! . ~! - E o NU c: .:. "5 N g" ~ .:. Jl!~ ~ u ...~ ...... .c.:.!!~~ -fj':'ll:I...;.8_ Q.l('''U1@ I-.:.~.o.<: 0.> ~ tJ:;: l5:::~~!! . 0 II li E Cl\N~ -:. Ln "" U <+""'~:3o C:.:.~~a\.g g.:.~~;;:~ /U(.~ -NC ~':'m;;;"".8 ld(''l;.o~@ a::('~-e.!!"'O .:. ~ ~:ii ~ .) iS~1 1;; .0. o "8.:. l8 ~ w<+::S~~ g- .:. Q::..,: 8 01-1 .:. ~~ U :C+:.S .u ~ .:. cti U; a <( .:. l: .0 .<:l cu .:"i tJ ~ Q., .:. 6i ~ ~ ~.:. o~ "C c: ~ - 1;; E ~ N8 'u .:. ~ en . l!t':'~~:8~ Ul':'~"':...;li _.:.!!o~c ~':'1;;~N.8 5:(~:g~@ U.S>\ ..C ':'~-H.!!O 5.:.G~:g~ "iii'" 0~2 e ~ w '" ~ E ~.:+ Gfg "in.:. ~- ~ .:.~..,: 8 .)~otl "~.:. ~ ~ :;::J .:. ~U1 .8 ~.:......o@ ~~.eJll.8 .s ... "':E E';' is ~ ~ .:.~l8g;~ c: . ... u o '.' ~ U1 " :;:; .:. ~~N g IV .:. CI; 0 C7l.l:l ~8..:.....~:i ~ ...~U1U10 U1...q:.o<o.<:l :ii .:....tJ u@ ~.:.li!!2i~ .:. ~is ~ ~ ~ E ~ .:. :R l:! g-~'~Ii:~ -1-1 ..+ ~."..u :C':')1~~ ~+:.~~o <(':'QU1~ OJ .:. u "'!:!. a.':':::!:-Hf ~ .:. 'Si! 0 cn.:-""'iiS"O ~ ~ Cl\CI\E +:. ... N 8 .:. ~~" .:. ~..,: iii ~ ,:. ~~ ~ li ~ ... I~....t....i E:: (!l .:. ... U1 U1 .8 .:.~.o~@ .:+ ""'i ti.!! .... .:. .. 1i .e. . .!:::oltJ' ... 02::i .... cu ~ Ul E (:-':' "'" ~ 8 ~':' Q.:~ 8" .-.. '.t- :ii .:. ~~~ V).:.i....ic~ cu .:. "'I U1 .8 .~.:.t.o@ :g .:. '" tJ 32 OJ .:. 6 ~ <<It ii .:. o:i l5. U' E o u E .:.~Siro8 .:. CI; ~ 5l 8 lil .:. ..'..,: iii "" 1;;(.~~::::li ~ .:. ~ -...t c 21.:. a;;;U1.8 lQ':'QC.o~@ 3.:.E-H.!!:;; .:- ~ ~:ii ii .:. is~~ .b I")~ ~c;; U)~ U')cb z12 ~~ ....:u) ii:!e.. a. x ui~ . . <00 1")0 >- ~ E ~ cO 8 ~ 12 0 I-~ Uiii5g: ~~5 > CULl U') c: . ~~I ~ ~;: t:!i~~~ !81 st.. .B& :( i ~C~E ~. Boriestroo -=- Rosene ..~.. .... ..AnderJik& . 1 \11 Associates Engineers & Architects 2335 West Highway 36 .StPauJ, MN55JJ3 Office: 651-636c4600 . Fax: 651-636-13JJ wwwb6nestr.o6com December29,2006 RECEIVED JAN 03 2007 John Meyer Finance Director City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038-9794 CENTERV/LLE, MN Re:DowntownRedeve10pment -"Public Infrastructure Comprehensive Plan Engineering Scope and Proposal BRAA Temp File No. 000616-06000-0 Dear John, As requested, we have prepared a scope and proposal for engineering. services to develop a comprehensive public infrastructure plan to accommodate the planned redevelopment of the downtown area. Our proposed scope is as follows: . Streets . · Determine overall street and right-of-way width for all segments of public street · Determine location oftum lanes · Determine loc~tion and tYpe of parking lanes · Determine intersection controls (stop sign, crosswalk, etc. locations) Streetscapinl! . · Determine location, width andt)tpes of sidewalks along all public streets · Determine location and type of allpublic landscaping/streetscaping elements o Trees o Lights o Other decorative elements Water · Determine size and location of water mains, valves and hydrants · Evaluate capability of City'ssupply, storage and distribution system to handle proposed redevelopment Sewer · Determine size, location and depth of sewer mains and manholes · Evaluate capability of City's downstream collection system to handle proposed redevelopment Storm Sewer, Pondinl! and Infiltration · Determine location and routes for maJor storm water conveyance systems · Determine needed capacities for major storm water conveyance systems · Determine location and required geometric (volume, mean. depth, shape) characteristics for storm water ponding facilities · Determine infiltration requirements and compile a list of preferred best management practices (BMPs) to be incorporated into developers' plans SL Paul, St.. Cloud, Roc,hester, MN . Milwaukee, WI . Chicago, Il Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned General · 'Develop a phasing plan for public infrastructure consistent with the City's current prospective aevelopment proposal from the Beard Group Deliverables · 20 Copies of complete report including: o llxl7 maps o Detailed cost estimates '. 5 Copies of each of the following maps (22x34) , o Street/Streetscaping Plan o Street Typical Sections o Water Main Plan o Sewer Main Plan o Storm Sewer and Ponding Plan The tasks listed above would be completed as part of this report for a lump sum fee of $23,000. It would' ' be important to note that the. fmdings of this report will only identify sizes and locations of public infrastructure in a general way. As the infrastructure work is bid out, each individual project will need to be designed in much more detail, using this report only as ageneral guideline. Thereport and maps completed by Darilon-Farber would be used as a basis for the a.ssumptions needed to properly size and locatethe infrastructure. Street cross sections and streetscaping elements proposed in our study would be consistent with those laid out in the Damon-Farber report as welL We have outlined the study area on the attached map from their report. , . . This report would be drafted to meet the requirements for a feasibility report under MN Chapter429 laws, , should the improvements be assessed. Based on preliminary evaluations, the project may require the completion of an Environmental' AssessmentWorksheet (EA W). We have attached a separate proposal for the completion and administration of this document and process. .. . Please let me know if you have any questions. , Sincerely, BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INe. ~1/:><f MarkStatz, PE City Engineer Attachments: Study Area Map EA W Proposal Copy: Dallas Larson; City of Centerville Paul Palzer, City of Centerville MRR RJG LRF file Downtown Centerville Master Plan & Development Guidelines c .0 "'i'~' . .. Downtown Centerville Master Plan ee~ ':"1:>,,,: 1-1. ....~) . . ~ STVb1 8 O"N~'t January 4, 2006 Page 8 of 34 Jt]j.. Bonestroo -=- .Rosene .' .~.. ". A. nderlil<:. & 1 \J 1 Associates Engineers & An:hitects 2335 West Highway36- St. Paul, MN 55113 . Office:.65H36-4600 - Fax: 651c636-1311 www.bo.nesrroo:corri December 29,2006 John Meyer Finance Director City of CenterviIle 1880 Main Street CenterviIle, MN 55038 , , . , RE: Proposal for Preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet, CenterviIle Downtown Redevelopment Project,CenterviIle, Minnesota ' Dear,Mr. Meyer: Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. (Bonestroo) has prepared this proposaHor the' preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W) for the proposed CenterviIle Downtown Redevelopment Project in Centerville, Minnesota. The Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) for the project is the City of Centerville. . . The boundaries of the redevelopment area are generally 6ne-halfblock west of CentervilleRoadon the west, one-half block east of Progress Road on the east, one-half block southofWestview Street on the north, and one~halfblock south of Heritage Streetonthe south. The currently proposed redevelopment project involves the demolition of existing structures andconstruction of362 residential units (multi-, family), 68,000 square feet ofretail space, parking facilities, roadway improvements, trails and open space areas, utilities, and stormwater management facilities. The number of multi-family residential units proposed (362), combined with the 68,000 squarefeet of proposed retail space, triggers a mandatory EA W under Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410.4300 Subpart 32. SCOPE OF SERVICES The general scope of work will be to collect and analyze information pertinent to the project and potential environmental impacts, and to incorporate this information intotheEA W in accordance with the rules and. intent oftheguidelines set forth by the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB). Our proposed scope of work is divided into the tasks discussed below: Task 1 : Define Project, Collect Information and Identify Areas of Concern Information submitted for the EA W must specifically describe the proposed project and predict the project's environmental impacts. The scope' of this task is to collect all relevant information, including design plans, engineering plans and reports, and all potential variations of the project that can be reasonably expected. This task also involves collecting copies oflocalgovernment planningdocumeIitssuch as comprehensive plans, zoning maps, watershed plans, information on loca} infrastructure {e. g., traffic, water, sewer), soils maps, groundwater information, surface water featl,lres, historical and cultural resource information, and unique local features information (e.g.,fish, wildlife, ecology,patks,trails). St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN - Milwau/<ee, WI- Chicago; IL Affirmative. Action/Equal ,Opportunity Employer and Employe.e Owned City ofCenterville Centerville Downtown RedevelopmentProject December 29, 2006 Page 2 IdentifYing the areas of concern will be accomplished through discussion with local government staff and regulatory agencies, and, if appropriate, other affected parties. Soliciting input and addressing environmental concerns from all parties early on in the EA W process is invaluable in minimizing project . delays. Should previously unrecognized environmental issues become evident during this process, the scope of the environmental analysis (see Task 5) can be modified to address the concerns. Supporting studies that appear at this time to be needed include analyses of traffic impacts, air quality and noise impacts, and wetland impacts (see Tasks 2-4 below). A stormwater analysis will also be needed but will be completed under a separate scope of work. It is assumed that the results of the stormwater analysis will be available in time for use in preparation ofthe EA W. For thepurposesofthis proposal, it is assumed that other studies or field surveys (such as cultural resources/archaeological surveys, etc.) will not be necessary to complete the EA W, or that they will be completed. under a separate scope of work. If additional studies or field surveys become warranted, we will contact you immediately and discuss how you wish to proceed. Task 2: Traffic Analysis The traffic study included in the CSAH 14 study does not appear to include sufficient future growth to cover the proposed land uses in. the City's redevelopment area. Therefore, a traffic study relative specifically to the proposed redevelopment project will be completed in order to determine the traffic impacts that could be expected to result from the project. We propose the following activities to complete the traffic portion of this proposed development's EA W: · Collect necessary background information on theproject, including traffic counts at six (6) intersections during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. · Prepare peak hour traffic forecasts for the study intersections for the years 2010 and 2030. Prepare average daily traffic forecasts on CSAH 14 and CSAH 21 for the years 2010 and 2030. · Analyze the traffic impacts of the proposed development for the years 2010 and 2030. The analyses would include the peak hour operations at the study intersections and the daily volumes on the study roadways. · Prepare a draft report discussing our process, results, and recommendations for the traffic operations associated with the proposed development. Our collection of background data includes confirming that less intense development was used in the CSAH 14 EA W to ensure this traffic study is needed. Three meetings with the City, developers, and/or the County are also expected to discuss our processes and results, including a kick-off meeting to discuss initial assumptions and study direction. Task 3: Wetland DeterminationIDelineation Since we are outside of the growing season (April- October), a wetland determination will be performed to identifY wetlands located within the project area. We anticipate investigating at least three areas based on aerial photo, National Wetlands Inventory, and hydric soils map review. We will provide preliminary wetland boundaries based on the field investigation. In the spring (during the growing season), a wetland delineation will be performed in accordance with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers standard jurisdictional wetland delineation protocol to identifY wetiand areas and determine potential impact or avoidance issues. A wetland delineation report will be prepared and submitted to the Rice Creek Watershed District for approval as the Local Government Unit (LGU) responsible for the administration of the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). City ofCenterville CenterviUe DowntownRedevefopment Project December 29,2006 Page 3 Task 4: Air Quaiity and Noise Impact Analyses SBP Associates will complete the air qualityandnoise impact analyses. One meeting is anticipated tobe needed. The noise analysis will include: monitoring at up to three locations in order to assess existing project-area noise levels; modeling using the Minnoise computer model to predict post-project noise levels; and preparation of a report for attachment to the EAW. The report will include a summary of results comparing projected noise analysis results to appropriate standards, a description ofthe analysis process and methodology, noise modeling and monitoring results, and the traffic information used in the analysis. The air quality analysis will consist of dispersion modeling, data analysis and report preparation. Background carbon monoxide monitoring is not included as it is unlikely to be required for this study. SBP will use the CAL3QHC computer model to predict the post-development air quality impact ofthe project-area traffic on nearby receptors. For attachment to the EA W, a report will be prepared that includes a summary of results comparing projected carbon monoxide levels to appropriate standards, a description ofthe analysis process and methodology, carbon monoxide modeling results, and the traffic information used in the analysis. Task 5: Analyze Information in EA W Context and Format, Prepare Draft EA W Once environmental issues have been identified and the relevant information has been collected, analysis of predicted environmental impacts can be completed. This task is designed to predict the proposed project's environmental impacts within the EQB intent and guidance. Information from the supporting studies conducted under Tasks 2-4 (traffic, wetlands, air quality and noise impacts) will be incorporated into the EA W. During this task, the specific questions in the EA W form are responded to, using development plans and other relevant information as the factual basis for analysis and response. All responses will be of a length and type appropriate to there levance of the question, and may include for reference figures, tables, maps, . and/or related correspondence. The completion of this task will include a draft copy of the EA W submitted to the City of Centerville as theRGU for review of its content and accuracy. Task 6: Revise EA W withRGU Review Comments, Prepare and Distribute EA W Copies, Prepare and Submit EA W Notice to EQBand Local Newspaper This task encompasses preparing copies of the EA W (both paper and electronic, if requested) for submittal to the RGU for adoption/approval for publication. This task also includes incorporating comments and responding to questions the RGU may have prior to adopting and releasing the EA W for public comment. It is assumed that approximately 10 copies of the EA W will be needed for City approval. The EA W will be prepared and distributed to the agencies on the EQB EA W Distribution List. The number of copies needed for distribution varies depending on the nature and location of the project, as well as the number of other parties who have expressed interest in the project. In most cases, approximately 35-40 copies are needed. A notice of EA W availability will be submitted to the Environmental QualityBoard (EQB)for publication in the EQB Monitor. A notice will also be submitted to a local newspaper as required by EQB rules. City ofCenterville Centerville Downtown Redevelopment Project December 29, 2006 Page 4 Task 7: Response to Comments, Findings of Fact and Record of Decision After the EA W has been through the 30-day comment period, Task 7 entails providing written responses to questions raised by commenter's. The level of effort needed to address this task is difficult to predict because the nature and number of comments to be received is unknown. For the purposes of this proposal, we are anticipating that approximately 8-10 different comments will be received and that no additional studies will be needed. to address the comments. Note that we may receive more than 8-10 comment/etters, but we are anticipating that some of the letters will contain similar comments. Task 7may also involve assisting the RGU with preparation of the Findings of Fact and Record of Decision (FOF/ROD), if assistance is desired. For this project, we are assuming Bonestroo will assistthe City in this effort and will prepare and distribute the final documents with City input. It is assumed that approximately 10 copies of the final documents will be needed for City approval. After approval of the FOF/ROD, the official document is distributed along with the Response to Comments to all those who commented on the EA W, as well as the agencies on the EA W Distribution List. The Notice of Decision will be submitted to the EQB for publication in the EQB Monitor. . Task 8: Meetings . In addition to the meetings included in the scope of Tasks 2 and 4 above (traffic and noise/air impact analyses), our proposal includes one Bonestroo staff person in attendance at the two City Council meetings where key EA W approvals are scheduled to occur. If additional meetings or presentations . becomenecessaryduring the EA W process, they will be billed on a time and materials basis as an additional service. SCHEDULE A schedule for the EA W process is summarized below; a more detailed schedule is attached. Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 We estimate that Task 1 willtake approximately three weeks to complete after project authorization, subject to the receipt of information requested from the project proposer, the City of Centerville, other government agencies contacted, etc. Once authorized to begin, the traffic analysis could be completed with a draft report provided to the City for review within 8 weeks, assuming timely meetings can be scheduled to fit. Please note that once the traffic study begins, changes to the proposed development land uses would require us to re-start our process, potentially incurring additional time and expenses. The wetland determination can be completed soon after project authorization, depending on weather conditions. Results of the determination will be incorporated into the EA W. The wetland delineation can be completed when the growing season commences (spring 2007) and can be completed within two weeks. Results of the delineation will not be available for publication in the EA W but may be available for inclusion in the Findings of Fact. The noise monitoring can be conducted immediately following the notice-to-proceed and the kick-off meeting. It will take one or two daysofgood weather days to complete. The noise modeling can begin as soon as SBP receives existing and post-development peak- hour traffic volumes for the affected roadways. The modeling and draft reportcan be completed within two weeks from receiving the traffic volume data. City of Centerville Centervi/le Downtown Redevelopment Project Task 5 Task 6 Task7 ' Task8. Overall December 29, 2006 Page 5 The air quality modeling study requires the Level of Service analysis for each affected intersection, including turning movement and signal timing information. The modeling and draft report can. be completed within one week from receiving this information. . We estimate that Task 5 will take approximately eight weeks to complete, subject to the completion of the supporting studies in Tasks 2-4, We will begin Task 5 immediately upon project authorization, at the same time we begin Task'l. Revision of the EA W in response to RGU/DNR review comments and information requests will take place within one week of receipt of the review comments. Approval of the EA W for distribution will occur depending on the RGU's schedule for processing the EA W. Notice and distribution of the EA W will take place according to the EQB Monitor Publication Calendar for 2007 (see attached). Response to public comments and assistance with preparation oftheFOFIROD will be completed within four weeks of the close of the public commentperiod. Distribution and publication ofthe Notice of Decision will be completed according to the EQB Monitor Publication Calendar for 2007 (see attached). Attendance at two City Council meetings (EA W approval, Responses and Findings of Fact/Record of Decision approval) We estimate we can submit a draft EA W for review within eight weeks of the authorization to proceed. . ESTIMA TED COST We estimate the total cost to complete the EA W process fodhe Centerville Downtown Redevelopment Project to be approximately $41,577 including reimbursable expenses. A cost breakdown by task is presented in the table below. Please note: If changes are made to the project that cause sections of the EAWto require revision, additional time and cost may be needed. Cost by Task . Task Estimated Cost Task 1 Info Collection $970 , Task 2 Traffic Analysis $12,385 -::- (includes $2,400 for traffic counts. If traffic counts by the City/County are available for use, the cost will be reduced.) Task 3 Wetland Determination/Delineation . $6001$1500 Task 4 Air Quality and Noise Impacts $5,284 (Based on previous experience, the EA W may not require a complete air quality modeling analysis. If this is the case, the costs for the air quality analysis will be reduced.) Task 5 EA W Preparation $9328 Task 6 EA W Revision, Copies, Distribution $3021 , Task7 Responses, FOFIROD $7069 TaskS Meetings $970 Mileage; DNR fee $450 , Total $41,577 City ofCenterville Centerville DowntownRedevelopment Project December 29, 2006 Page 6 ADDITIONAL SERVICES This proposal includes the attendance of one Bonestroo stiff person, in addition to our usual city engineering representative, at the two Council meetings where key EAW approvals. are scheduled to occur (see Task 8). It also includes the three meetings anticipated to be needed during completion of the . traffic analysis and the noise and air impact analyses (seeTasks 2 and 4). If additional meetings or presentations become necessary, related work would be under a separate scope and cost. If you have any questions or wish additional information, please call Mark Statz at 651-604-4709 or Lisa Fay at 651-604-4866. If this proposal meets your needs, let us know as soon as possible so we maybegin work. Sincerely, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ~.v7 A-- Mark Statz Client Service Manager Centerville Downtown Redevelopment Project EAW Centerville, Minnesota EAW Process Schedule EAW Process and Potential Schedule The following table presents the general steps in the EAW process and provides a potential schedule for completion. We may need to adjust for City meeting schedules. The schedule assumes the City is the RGU for the project. Task Timing/Completion Date Prepare Draft EAW, complete supporting studies January 11 - March 8, 2007 (8 weeks, subject (traffic, wetland, air and noise), incorporate summary of to completion of supporting studies) studies, internal review Submit Draft EAW to City and project proposer for March 8 - March 15, 2007 (1 week) review Revise EAW based on City and project proposer March 15 - March 22, 2007 (1 week) review, prepare copies for City Council packets Submit to City for mailing in Council packets by March 23, 2007 City Council meeting to approve EAW for public release March 28, 2007 Submit notice of EAW to EQB for publication April 2, 2007 Distribute EAW to agencies April 5, 2007 30-day comment period begins wi EAW notice in EQB April 9,2007 Monitor Publish legal notice in local newspaper (within 30-day comment period) 30-day comment period ends May 9, 2007 Prepare Responses to Comments with City and project May 9 - June 6, 2007 proposer assistance, if needed (4 weeks - consecutive with FOF/ROD) Prepare Findings of Fact/Record of Decision May 9 - June 6, 2007 (FOF/ROD) (4 weeks - consecutive with Responses) Submit draft FOF/ROD and responses to City for review June 6 - June 13, 2007 (1 week) (Project proposer may also review responses) Revise FOF/ROD and responses based on City review, June 13 - June 20, 2007 (1 week) prepare copies for City Council packets Submit to City for mailing in Council packets By June 22, 2007 City Council approves FOF/ROD and issues decision June 27, 2007 on need for EIS - positive or negative declaration As of the date of signature, the project is free to proceed to permitting and construction, provided the decision is a Negative Declaration on the need for an EIS. Submit to EQB for publication of decision July 9, 2007 Distribute responses and FOF/ROD with Decision to The week of July 9, 2007 agencies Notice of Decision is published in EQB Monitor July 16, 2007 Changes to the project design that require sections of the EAW to be re-written may result in additional time needed. '~:~~~:~~?;;~:l '~~','~:!,;:,r::::: :,;;':i:;~~/r:;,~~g~ :/::t::f~i: i:~?~~~)~: :,:;' ;'j~)~;~~'~i:{1 ~~i~~~',;:; ';:<~ ~~:, )~[;~j~~~D>:;;'/~~~~i'(r:f~~? '~/:::~i'~;;:~~':;'r'~::~;~:~;:~2;~~: ",~gq.IJ, "'," ''', ..., "';", ",'", ' ,\:'.",,;,._.''f%Q!1ttfqm~qL "'" ',",;',:,,' -;"',. ,,,,',," '~,,.., .,. .~'::" V(Jl,,3p.lflL7~ 1~ ;::) ~;.':~< ~ ~:~~'-~J~ :;~ ;.:~:~if.: t"~~' : ."~~~ ;," :, .::~~:)~; ::'~~'~~::~~,~"'L\~4:;'~:~~~~'1~~/~:-i;~~:;;~~g~:~j::: .~Y. :/( i) ; ~~ 1,: :~'~~.~~~:;:ii}:'~;~_~~~;~,:~~~f;;~$;~,,~r;.:,,!.~~~.:> <' :~~:"~:.5~':; ;; ~. !f~,~}{':<~'<~~{~l! EQB Monitor Publication Calendar for 2007 Deadline for Submission Publication Date EA W Comment Deadline January 8,2007 January 15,2007 February 14,2007 January 22 January 29 February 28 February 5 February 12 March 14 February 16 (Friday) February 26 March 28 March 6 March 12 Aprilll March 19 March 26 April 25 April 2 April 9 May 9 April 16 April 23 M?y 23 April 30 ' May 7 June 6 May 14 May 21 June 20 May 25 (Friday) June 4 July 4 June 11 June 18 July 18 June 25 July 2 August 1 July 9 July 16 August 15 July 23 July 30 August 29 August 6 August 13 September 12 August 20 August 27 September 26 August 31 (Friday) September 10 October 10 September 17 September 24 October 24 October 1 October 8 November 7 October 15 October 22 November 21 October 29 November 5 December 5 November 9 (Friday) November 19 December 19 November 26 December 3 January 2, 2008 December 10 December 17 January 16, 2008 December 24 December 31 January 30, 2008 , t LMC League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust 145 University Avenue West, st. Paul, MN 55103-2044 (651) 281-1200 · (800) 925-1122 Fax: (651) 281-1298 · TOD: (651) 281-1290 www.lmnc.org r-e- 0/ Minnuofa Crne. CiDu promoting o=J1tmctl November 29, 2006 To: LMCIT members and agents From: Pete Tritz Re: Rates, dividends, and coverage changes Enclosed are materials explaining the dividend actions and the changes in coverage and premium rates LMCIT members will see for the coming year. As always, feel free to contact LMCIT if you have questions or comments about any of these. A couple of the changes will call for some action or decisions by the city. In particular, we'd suggest that the city pay particular attention to these two: · The statutes require minimum limits of $50,000 for uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage. Many cities have elected to increase that limit to $1 million. The premium charge for that increased limit will increase substantially this year. In light of that increase, cities should review why they carry the increased limit, what value if any that increased limit provides to the city, and whether it continues to make sense for the city to purchase higher UMlUIM coverage limits on city vehicles. · There are some changes and new limitations in how the LMCIT liability coverage will respond to a claim against a city employee which results from the employee's activities as a member or officer in an outside organization. Cities should review what organizations city employees are involved in and whether those organizations have addressed their liability risks, and decide whether participating in the organization will be considered part of the employee's duties as a city employee. Finally, for several years LMCIT has been working on finding a better solution to covering the risk of flood damage to city buildings. We've developed some ideas for how LMCIT might be able to provide flood coverage, but it would involve some additional cost to member cities. The LMCIT Board is looking for feedback from cities and agents about whether to go ahead with the project. The enclosed memo outlines how a flood coverage program might work, and what the benefits and costs might be. Please review it and let us know what you think. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER LMC League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust 145 University Avenue West, st. Paul, MN 55103-2044 (651) 281-1200 . (800) 925-1122 Fax: (651) 281-1298 . TDD: (651) 281-1290 www.lmnc.org L-g_ of Mm_ota Cmu Citiu promoting ...-JIlin/>> November 29, 2006 To: LMCIT members and agents From: LMCIT Re: Coverage changes for 2006-2007 Here's a summary of coverage changes cities will see for the coming year. These changes will affect property/casualty coverage written or renewed on or after November 15, 2006. Bond coverage Faithful performance coverage. All bond coverage will now be written as blanket faithful performance coverage. LMCIT will no longer offer the option of fidelity-only coverage, or fidelity coverage with faithful performance coverage on specific positions, which very few cities used. Like fidelity coverage, faithful performance coverage protects the city for losses from employee dishonesty. Unlike fidelity coverage, faithful performance coverage also covers other types oflosses to the city that are caused by an employee's malfeasance, willful neglect of duty or bad faith. Audit and accounting costs. The bond coverage will now include coverage for audit and accounting costs the city incurs in connection with a bond loss, up to an amount equal to 25% of the city's actual loss. Property coverage Terrorism losses. LMCIT currently gives the city a maximum of $1 million per year of coverage for property damage caused by terrorism. For the coming year, that limit will increase to $5 million annually. However, the $1 million annual limit will still apply to damages caused by chemical or biological contamination or by cyber-terrorism. (Note that the LMCIT property coverage excludes coverage for any nuclear contamination, regardless of the cause.) Vacant buildings. For several years, LMCIT has limited coverage for damage to any vacant building to an amount equal to the market value of the building. The coverage language is revised to clarify that coverage for costs such as demolition, debris removal, and pollutant cleanup are within, and not in addition to, that limit. Extraordinary expense coverage. LMCIT's unique "extraordinary expense" coverage is designed to assist cities who are hit with a cash flow problem because of necessary but unanticipated expenses the city has incurred in order to protect the public health and safety or to AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER meet the city's legal obligations. For the coming year, the limit on this coverage will increase from $100,000 to $250,000. More information on the extraordinary expense coverage is available on the League website at http://www.1mnc.org/lmcit/memos.cfm. Asbestos and pollutant cleanup. The coverage language is revised to clarify when and how the coverage for asbestos and pollutant cleanup applies. The asbestos and pollutant cleanup coverage applies when a city building has been damaged or contaminated by a release of accidental release, discharge, or dispersal of asbestos or other pollutants which begins and ends within a 72 hour period. However, this doesn't apply if the release was the result of a renovation, remodeling, or demolition project. The limit for pollutant cleanup coverage will increase to $250,000, same as the current asbestos cleanup limit. Property in the open. There are minor changes to slightly broaden the types of property in the open (PIO) which are automatically covered when the city schedules PIO coverage for a specific site. Auto coverage UM/UIM coverage. The language for the uninsured/underinsured motorist (UMIUIM) coverage is revised to clarify that the intent is to provide the exact type and scope of coverage which state law requires. Work comp Diagnostic testing for meningitis. The LMCIT work comp coverage includes coverage for the cost of diagnostic testing of employees who have been potentially exposed to four specified infectious diseases: hepatitis, HIV / AIDS, tuberculosis, and anthrax. The coverage pays up to $2,500 per exposure incident for the cost of medically appropriate diagnostic testing following an on-the-job exposure incident. For the coming year, meningitis is added to the list of diseases for which diagnostic testing is covered. Liability coverage There will be a new $100,000 annual limit on coverage for liability claims against city officers or employees which arise from their activities as officers or members of outside organizations. A separate memo is enclosed which explains this change and the reasons for it, and offers suggestions for how cities should address this risk. LMC League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust 145 University Avenue West, st. Paul, MN 55103-2044 (651) 281-1200 · (800) 925-1122 Fax: (651) 281-1298 · TOD: (651) 281-1290 www.lmnc.org I.-gw. 0/ Mi,.nuobJ Cmu Cil.ia promoting =cel!tmCfl November 29, 2006 To: LMCIT Members and Agents From: LMCIT Board of Trustees Re: 2006 - 2007 Property/Casualty Rates and Dividend 2007 Workers' Compensation Rates Property/casualty rates and dividend for 2006 - 2007 Rates Here are the premium rate changes LMCIT members will see at their next renewal. The property/casualty rate changes apply to renewals on or after November 15, 2006. . Municipal liability rates will decrease 3%. . Property rates will increase 10%. . Auto liability rates will decrease 3%. . Auto physical damage will decrease 3%. In addition to these changes, there's a significant rate change for increased limits on UM/UIM. The rate for $1 million limits will increase 250%. Rates for the basic $50,000 limit will remain unchanged. As we review our loss experience, it's clear that our rates are insufficient to reflect the risk associated with UMIUIM claims - particularly at the increased limit. The increase reflects the actual risk based on our loss experience. The rate increase will no doubt cause some cities to reevaluate whether the higher limits are really necessary. To help in that evaluation we've redrafted our risk management memo on auto coverage options to include a full discussion of the UMIUIM options. That memo is available on our website or by calling the League offices. There are no changes for excess liability, machinery breakdown, liquor liability, bond rates, or open meeting law defense. Rate changes are primarily driven by loss experience. The rate changes listed do not mean that your city's actual premium will necessarily increase or decrease by these exact amounts. Although rates do indeed influence premiums, your city's actual premium will also be affected by changes in expenditures, property values, payrolls, and other exposure measures, and also by changes in your experience rating. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER Dividend Property/casualty program members will share a $4 million dividend this year. This is quite a bit less than the $12 million we returned last year and the $9 million we returned for three years prior. The decrease in dividend is primarily the result of higher-than-usuallosses and loss development. As it turns out, there were quite a few mid-sized to large losses in 2005-2006. As in the past, we'll distribute the dividend in mid-December. The dividend formula will be the same as we've used for several years. Under that formula, each city's share is proportionate to the difference between the city's total earned premiums and total incurred losses for all years the city has been a member, with large individual losses capped for purposes of the formula. Work comp rates for 2007 Overall work comp rates will remain steady for 2007, although class rate changes may impact cities differently. Every three years, the LMCIT Board reviews and revises the relative levels of premium rates for the various classes of employees. To the extent possible, we set the rates for each class based on LMCIT's own actual loss experience by class for the preceding five-year period. In implementing adjustments to the class rate schedule for 2007, we've imposed a 20% constraint on the amount of increase by which any individual class rate can change. For a city with a typical mix of payrolls, the class rate changes will offset each other to a large extent. However, a special purpose entity member with most of its payroll in one or two classes will see a much bigger effect. This is particularly noticeable for 2007 in the volunteer fire class. But it's important to note that the actual increases for a few classes would have been much greater without the 20% cap. Without the cap, volunteer fire rates based on the actual losses would have increased almost 75%. The following table details the 2007 rate changes for the classifications that cover the bulk of city payrolls. There are a number of other classes that are used more sparingly in cities. It's important to note that most job class rates are shown per $100 of payroll. The rates for volunteer fire (7708 and 7718) are shown per 100 of population. LMCIT % LMCIT Code Description 2006 Chanae 2007 5506 Street 7.04 11 7.80 9402 Sewer, snowplow, etc. 7.04 11 7.80 7380 Ambulance 6.27 -17 5.18 7381 Vol. Ambulance 6.34 20 7.61 7502 Gas Ops 2.42 20 2.89 7520 Waterworks 3.03 20 3.64 7539 Electric or Steam Plant 4.00 -9 3.64 7580 Sewage Plant 4.03 -39 2.48 7610 Cable TV .40 19 .48 2 7706 Fire - Paid 6.13 11 6.79 7716 Fire - Paid (non-smokiriCi) 5.53 11 6.11 7708 Fire - Volunteer 62.99 20 75.59 7718 Fire-Vol (non-smokina) 56.71 20 68.06 7720 Police 4.06 -4 3.90 7721 Police (non-smokina) 3.65 -4 3.51 8017 Liquor - Off Sale 2.13 3 2.19 8227 City Shop 5.26 15 6.05 8810 Clerical .61 19 .72 8829 Nursing Home - Prof 4.89 -10 4.42 8830 Nursinq Home - Other 3.63 10 3.99 8833 Hospital - Prof 2.64 -17 2.19 9015 Buildinq Maint 4.80 -2 4.72 9033 Housing Authoritv 3.62 -25 2.71 9040 Hospital - Other 5.44 20 6.52 9060 Golf course 1.72 -7 1.60 9063 Community center 1.56 -15 1.33 9084 Liquor - On Sale 3.53 -9 3.22 9102 Parks 3.21 3 3.31 9182 Ice Arenas 1.87 -33 1.25 9403 Garbaqe 7.06 1 7.11 9410 Municipal Employees 1.10 -62 .42 9411 Elected Officials .42 -57 .18 In addition to the overall flat rates and indicated class rate changes, the work comp credit for managed care participation will be reduced from 3% to 2%. Ongoing analysis ofthe managed care work comp program shows inconclusive savings for participation in managed care. While we think a credit still makes sense for managed care, the reduction is indicative of some caution about the ultimate benefit of managed care in workers' compensation. The work comp program will not return a dividend this year. What's behind the rate changes? Property/casualty Overall, the liability loss picture doesn't look much different than it has in the recent past, and we don't see any new trends or alarming patterns. Liability losses make up not quite half of our total loss cost and have been remarkably stable for the past few years. Actual loss costs have been coming in below our projections. Litigation relating to land use regulation and development continues to be a concern. Land use litigation costs average between about $2 and $2.5 million a year - and they can vary a great deal from year to year. Of similar concern are sewer back-up liability costs, which shot up to the $2 million range in 2005 and are expected to be similar for 2006. Police liability claims also look to be high thus far in 2006. Property makes up about a third of our loss cost and property losses tend to be more variable than liability. We did have higher-than-expected property losses this year, which accounts for 3 the rate increase. A string of storm, fire and other losses pushed loss rates up in the '05 underwriting year and the early projection is that '06 will be similar or worse. The other major factor impacting this year's property rates is an increase in LMCIT's reinsurance premiums. Because of the high reinsurance limits we need to purchase in order to cover possible catastrophic losses (e.g. the tornado that moves through several cities), reinsurance costs are a large cost component in our property program, representing about 35% of property premium costs. Our reinsurance costs have gone up this year in part due to our loss history and also as a result of coverage changes we've implemented. Workcomp Although we were able to keep overall work comp rates flat for 2007, rising medical costs continue to be a major concern. Medical costs for work comp injuries are projected to continue increasing at a rate of about 9% a year. Medical costs now make up over half of work comp loss costs - about as much as indemnity benefits, Special Compensation Fund assessments, and defense costs combined. Our work comp indemnity costs have been generally stable and less than projections. While this is good and helps offset the increase in medical costs, we also need to keep an eye on injury frequency. Hopefully cities can continue reducing the numbers of employee injuries; that's really the best tool we have to control future premium costs. Investment income remains a very important element in the LMCIT work comp program, though not quite as significant as it was a few years ago. Investment income now produces about a quarter of the program's total revenue; a few years ago, it was over a third. Nevertheless, investment income is still very important. Premiums alone would not quite cover projected losses, let alone administrative and reinsurance costs. How was the dividend amount determined? Most LMCIT members are very familiar with LMCIT's approach to rate-setting. Briefly, the premium rates incorporate a safety margin. Premiums plus investment income are designed to produce enough revenue to cover losses and expenses even if losses turn out to be greater than projections. Iflosses turn out to be at projections, that margin isn't needed to pay for losses and is available either to be returned to members as a dividend or used to strengthen LMCIT's fund balance. If losses turn out to be lower than projections, that additional savings also becomes available to be returned to members. It can take several years until claims are finally settled and we know for sure what the actual loss costs were for any given underwriting year. For this reason, we have to work with estimates, which are continually revised and updated. The program's results and the amount of dividend we can return in anyone year therefore don't just depend on what happened during that year; the year's financial results are also affected by changes in our estimates of what prior year losses will ultimately cost. 4 The main factor behind this year's smaller dividend is that we incurred losses at a higher level than projected, primarily a string of mid-sized to larger fire and storm losses in 2005 and the beginning part of2006. These higher-than-projected losses reached into the safety margin we established when we set rates for the year. In addition, our review of prior years suggests that some of those losses may also turn out to be higher than we've previously projected. Using our margin to pay for these losses means there's less available to give back as a dividend. The LMCIT Board also again used a small part of this year's net income to further strengthen the program's fund balance. The Board concluded that this was appropriate in light of the continued growth in the property/casualty program's premium volume and the increased amount of risk LMCIT is now retaining. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact Pete Tritz or Ann Gergen at the League office, or any of the members of the LMCIT Board. 5 LMC League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust 145 University Avenue West, st. Paul, MN 55103-2044 (651) 281-1200 · (800) 925-1122 Fax: (651) 281-1298 · TOO: (651) 281-1290 www.lmnc.org r-e- of Min_ola Citiu Ciau promoting ..-.J1tmCQ November 29, 2006 To: LMCIT members and agents From: LMCIT Re: Liability coverage - employee activities in outside organizations Beginning in 2006-2007, the LMCIT liability coverage will include new provisions addressing when and how the LMCIT liability coverage will respond to claims against city officers or employees arising from their activities as officers or members of outside organizations. There are two elements to the changes: · The city council will determine whether or not an employee's activities in a particular organization are considered to be within the scope ofhislber city duties. The council's decision is final for purposes of coverage. · When the city council determines that an employee's activities in a particular organization are within the scope of his/her city duties, coverage for claims arising from that employee's activities in that organization are subject to a $100,000 annual limit per employee. Background City officers and employees often participate in outside organizations that are related in some way to their city duties. Examples include associations of wastewater operators, fire instructors, finance officers, etc. These organizations may engage in a wide variety of types of activities. If the employee's activities in those organizations leads to a liability claim against the individual, the organization mayor may not have insurance or assets to defend and indemnify the employee for that liability claim. If the organization is unable or unwilling to defend the individual, slbe will very likely look to the city for protection, and the city will likely look in turn to LMCIT. Why is this potentially a problem? This type of liability claim is problematic for a number of reasons: · The LMCIT liability coverage applies to claims against an individual which arise from activities within the course and scope of the individual's city duties. Determining whether an employee's activities in a particular organization are within his/her city duties is sometimes difficult. There are a wide range of types of organizations, that relate in different ways to city activities. Some organizations clearly have the purpose of benefiting the city; some are focused on broader public benefit, and benefit the city only indirectly if at all; others are AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER clearly more focused on benefiting the individual, rather than the city; and many have all of these purposes in varying combinations. The city council might not have a clear idea of what activities the outside organization is engaged in, or even that the employee is involved in such an organization. At the same time though, most cities also won't want to just leave their employee hanging on hislher own if slhe is being sued; and that may lead the city after the fact to take an expansive view of what's part of the employee's duties. · These organizations may be involved in any of a wide range of activities with significant potential for generating liability claims: holding conventions; conducting training; fund- raising activities; promulgating standards; advising, consulting, or making recommendations to members or cities; "certifying" individuals or departments or cities; censuring individuals for code of conduct violations; and so on. From LMCIT's standpoint, the concern is that we have no opportunity to be aware of the activities of these organizations, to evaluate those risks of those activities, or to provide risk management assistance to control and minimize those risks. Essentially, it can put LMCIT in the position of being the "insurer by default" of risks that we don't know about and don't have any opportunity to control. · There's a potential for catastrophically expensive claim costs. Employees from many different cities might be involved in the same organization, and could be sued in a single incident. That in turn could mean that there's a claim under each of five or ten (or twenty or fifty) cities' LMCIT liability coverages. Under the current coverage, LMCIT could be responsible for up to $1 million of damages (or more if the city has excess coverage) for each of the cities. In total, that could add up to an enormous cost. It can be even worse if the claims arise from a dispute among the individuals participating in the organization; LMCIT could literally end up paying for both sides who are suing each other. How is LMCIT addressing this issue? In addressing this issue, the LMCIT Board tried to find a balance between several somewhat conflicting goals: providing the broadest possible coverage to meet cities' risk management and coverage needs; protecting LMCIT members' funds by controlling the risk of very large loss costs that could result from these types of claims; and providing some certainty as to when these types of claims are covered and when they are not. The changes make it entirely the city's call as to whether or not an employee's activities in any outside organization are considered to be within the scope of the employee's city duties. That eliminates any potential factual disputes about whether on not coverage applies. The city can make that determination at any time, either in advance or after a claim has already occurred. The $100,000 limit greatly reduces the potential for catastrophically large loss costs to LMCIT. At the same time, it provides some safety net protection that should be enough to address many of the "surprise" situations that might come up. What kinds of outside organizations does this affect? Here's the definition of the "outside organizations" that are affected: 2 · A formally organized membership organization · A professional organization · Any for-profit or non-profit corporation These new provisions and limits don't affect city relief associations, which are already automatically covered under the city's LMCIT liability coverage. Nor do these changes affect joint powers entities or other governmental entities such as HRAs, utilities commissions, port authorities, etc. (Information on how coverage works for these types of entities is available on the League website. Contact LMCIT with any questions.) Finally, these provisions and limits don't affect any entity that's named as a covered party on the city's coverage. What should the city do to manage these risks? As a first step, it's a good idea to find out what organizations your city employees are involved in as members or officers, that might arguably be considered to be city-related. You'll also want to find out what the purpose of each organization is and what sorts of activities the organization is involved in. . In some cases, the city might determine that participation in a particular organization is not part of the city employee's city duties. In such a case, the city should let the employee know that if slhe chooses to participate in the organization, slbe is doing so on hislher own. It is a good practice to provide that information to the employee in writing. In other cases, the city might conclude that an employee should be encouraged or even required to participate in a particular organization. In those cases, the city will want to find out whether the organization has liability coverage to protect its members and officers for claims arising from those activities. If the organization hasn't done anything to cover the liability risks its officers and members face because of the organization's activities, the city has several options: · You might decide that the city is comfortable simply assuming the risk that the damages and defense costs for a liability claim against a city employee arising from his/her activities in the organization will be greater than the $100,000 limit. (In evaluating that risk, note that for unpaid officers or members of a non-profit corporation, M.S. 317 A.257 provides some, but by no means complete, protection from liability claims.) · You might decide that participating in the organization will not be considered part of the employee's city duties. In that case, of course, the city should make sure the employee understands that if s/he chooses to participate, s/he is doing so on hislher own. · The city may want to encourage the organization to get liability coverage. (In some cases depending on the organization's purpose and structure, the organization may be eligible to obtain coverage through LMCIT.) Questions? Contact Pete Tritz (651-281-1265; ptritz@lmnc.org) or Ann Gergen (651-281- 1291; agergen@lmnc.org) at the League office. 3 LMC League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust 145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 (651) 281-1200 · (800) 925-1122 Fax: (651) 281-1298 . TOO: (651) 281-1290 www.lmnc.org I.-gu.. of Minrauota Cmu CiUu promoting -Jm.C8 November 29, 2006 To: LMCIT members and agents From: LMCIT Re: Flood insurance - request for comments The LMCIT Board of Trustees is considering expanding property coverage to provide automatic flood insurance protection for all city buildings. We believe it's feasible to do so. It would involve increased premium costs for many cities, but that cost should be significantly less than the cost of flood insurance through the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). This memo outlines how the proposed flood coverage program would work, and what the costs, risks, and benefits would be. Because this would be a new coverage area with significant cost implications for cities, the LMCIT Board is seeking comments from cities on the concept, and in particular whether or not you would favor implementing a flood insurance program. The Board's final decision will rest in part on the feedback received from members. Background Right now many cities have no coverage for flood damage to many of their buildings. LMCIT provides limited flood coverage, but only for certain city buildings. Not every flood is automatically a "disaster, so in any given situation FEMA or state assistance mayor may not be available. LMCIT currently provides limited coverage for flood damage to certain city buildings. If a city documents that a particular building is outside the SOO-year flood plain, that building is scheduled as "Code A" on the property schedule. A city's "Code A" buildings are covered for flood damage up to a $500,000 annual aggregate limit. That limit applies to all water and flood damage during the year, regardless of the number of incidents or the number of buildings affected. LMCIT classifies buildings within the SOO-year flood zone as "Code C". For Code C buildings the city's only current option for covering flood damage is to purchase flood insurance through the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Only a handful of cities currently purchase flood coverage, and then only on certain selected buildings. The main reason few cities purchase NFIP flood insurance appears to be cost; an NFIP flood insurance policy for a city building may cost three to six times the LMCIT property premiums for that building. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER Code C buildings - i.e., buildings for which LMCIT provides no flood coverage - make up about 45% of the total value ofLMCIT members' buildings. 65% ofLMCIT member cities have at least some buildings classified as Code C. Again - it's important to remember not every flood is a "disaster" for which FEMA or state assistance would be available. You cannot assume that if flood damage occurs federal or state disaster assistance will be available. It mayor may not be. How would the proposed LMCIT flood coverage program work? The concept the LMCIT Board has been considering would work like this: · All city buildings would automatically be covered for flood damage. The coverage would be at least as broad as what an NFIP flood insurance policy would provide. · The limit on each building would be the lesser of either the actual replacement cost value or $500,000 on the building, plus the lesser of either actual replacement cost or $500,000 on contents. This matches the maximum limit offered by NFIP. · The flood insurance would be paid for through a surcharge on the property premiums for buildings within the 500-year flood hazard area. For buildings outside the 500-year flood zone, premiums wouldn't change (or would change by at most no more than a percent or two). A flood insurance program is probably only workable if the coverage is automatic and mandatory. We don't believe it's feasible to offer flood coverage as an option because of the "adverse selection" problem that would create. How much would it cost? Our best estimate of the amount needed to make the proposedjlood insurance program work is in the range of 35% of the total property premiums on properties within the 500-year jlood plain. If the cost were spread as a flat premium surcharge against Code C properties we estimate the premium surcharge would be in the range of 30 to 40 percent of the current LMCIT property premiums on those buildings. Please note that no decision has been made on an actual rating system, and there are any number of possibilities for alternative rating structures. E.g., there might be different surcharges for properties inside and outside the 100-year flood zone; or since the maximum limits would be $500,000 building and $500,000 contents, it might be appropriate to use a higher surcharge applied only to the premium for the first $1 million of value on high- valued buildings; and so on. To help put the costs in context, here are a couple cost comparisons for some "typical" city buildings: Dollar Cost of an NFIP Cost of an NFIP LMCIT property amount of a flood insurance flood insurance Building and premium at 35% policy, within policy, outside contents value current average premium the IOO-year the IOO-year LMCIT rates surchar2e flood zone flood zone Bldg: $200,000 Contents: $100,000 $450 $158 $3,325 $1,836 Bldg: $500,000 Contents: $500,000 $1,500 $525 $8,257 $3,879 Is flood really worth worrying about for most buildings? The risk of flood damage is not insignificant, even for buildings considered to be at low or moderate risk for flood. Spring run-off flooding of rivers and streams is the obvious risk that most of us will think of, but it's not the only flood risk. Localized torrential rainfall can also cause flood damage, and that can happen just about anywhere, including in areas considered to be at a low or moderate flood risk. There's a great deal of information on flood risks at FEMA' s website at http://www.floodsmart.govlt1oodsmartlpages/index.isp Tell us what you think A 35% premium increase on buildings in the 500-year flood plain would be significant, and it's not something the LMCIT Board would do lightly. Before making that decision, the Board wants to hear what you think. · Would you favor going ahead with a flood program, if it meant premium increases as outlined above? Would the benefit be worth the cost? · Should LMCIT continue to leave it to individual cities to decide whether to either buy an NFIP policy or self-insure their flood risk? · Should LMCIT look insteadfor other options - i.e., one that provides less protection but costs less? As you consider these questions and your reactions, here's a quick recap of the key points to consider: · Many cities currently have no coverage for flood damage to many of their buildings. Federal or state disaster assistance might or might not be available; if not, the city would be on its own for flood damage. · We think it's feasible to provide flood coverage for all city buildings, but it would significantly increase cities' property premium costs for buildings within the 500-year flood zone. Our best estimate is the increase would be in the range of35% ofthe premiums on those buildings. · Here are a couple other ways to think of that additional cost: It would be equivalent to about a 15% increase in total property premiums, or about a 5% increase in total property/casualty premmms. · Paying a 35% property premium surcharge to LMCIT would be far cheaper than buying an NFIP flood insurance policy - in the range of 5~ 15% of what the NFIP premium would be. · Remember - both the flood coverage and the charge would probably have to be mandatory for all LMCIT members in order for this kind of flood insurance program to be feasible. Please give call or e-mail us with your thoughts. We can't stress enough how important member feedback is to the Board's consideration of flood coverage. The LMCIT Board will be coming back to this issue early next year, so we'd like to hear from as many members as possible as soon as possible. Contact any of the following with your comments or questions: Pete Tritz, 651-281-1265, ptritz@lmnc.org Ann Gergen, 651-281-1291, agergen@lmnc.org Mike Wozniak, 651-215-4090, mwozniak@lmnc.org .....~.... i .....~i~tion Services - )I" for Anoka COWlty Heloine: to ~ conflict and reduce violence through education and conflict resolution services. RECEIVED JAN 0 4 2007 January 2, 2007 CENTERVILLE, MN Kim Moore-Skykes City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 Dear Kim: Thank you for the contribution for 2007 services. I appreciate your prompt attention to our request. I will mail the 2006 Annual Report the beginning of February. I hope you will read it and share with your city/town council. If you have not yet scheduled a time for me to visit your community and address the counci', please call me at 763-422-8878 or email a request to annw@mediationservice.orQ. If you have suggestions about how we can better serve your community, I am interested in hearing from you. Thank you again for your support. Best regards, I;~t-~c. ?77. J:Y/i'('(c2a-{;eCL Ann M. Wallerstedt ExeQJtive Director 2520 Coon Rapids Blvd. Suite 100 Coon Rapids, MN 55433 phone: 763-422-8878 fax: 763-422-0808 www.mediationservice.org A United Way Community Partner