HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-07-25 Handouts
-Jl
~,i j~
It Jf" t\
~n t'
. ,.'
TO:
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM:
Teresa Bender, Clerk/Treasurer
SUBJECT:
Liquor Policy
DATE:
July 25, 2001
Subsequent to speaking with Mr. Bisek, Mr. DeFoe and Mr. Sager this afternoon, Mr.
Montain was unable to reach him directly, left message at Trio. Mr. March discussed this
issue with Mr. Bisek and Mr. Montain prior to his departure. All of the above stated
individuals felt that additional time needed to be taken in consideration of a policy and
felt that a work session with Council to discuss this issue would be the proper method of
discussing same.
All of the above felt that they would benefit from meeting with neighboring
communities' business owners and the local law enforcement agencies on a regular basis
as previously organized several years ago.
If Council desires to proceed with this policy, Council needs to arrange a work session to
devote the needed time to consider same.
>&~
'..~ ;rli:
~ I~i'" 'I"\f"
; . '.. .... .,. ,~.
.; ..... ........ .'
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Member
FROM: Teresa Bender, Clerk/Treasurer
SUBJECT: Temporary Agency Employee
DATE: July 25,2001
I spoke with three (3) Temporary Agencies in regards to obtaining a temporary clerical
person.
Kelly Services charges approximately $16.80 - 18.20 for a skill level of 50 wpm,
Receptionist and customer greeter/helper. Kelly's pays all payroll taxes and benefits.
Temporary employee is guaranteed 4 hours minimum per day.
Manpower charges approximately $17.60 - 19.36 for the same skilled individual and
pays all payroll taxes and benefits. If chosen to hire, negotiate % of yearly salary as
buyout on contract.
Midwest Staffing Group, Inc. approximately $11.00 - $ 12.00/hour + 1.6% of total earned.
City pays payroll taxes. Minimum contract: 520 hours or 13 weeks.
Staff is aware of an individual that has provided community service hours to the City
recently, who has stated willingness to ascertain employment within the City.
Council/Staff may consider arranging a contract on their own instead of the services
listed above which seem costly.
Eag1e Pass problems
Page 1 of 1
Teresa Bender
From: Bert Casper [bertcasper@qwest.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25,2001 12:07 PM
To: tbender@centervillemn.com; mayacat@qwest.net
Cc: James Halstrom
Subject: Eagle Pass problems
Now that Gorem is planning to re-plat the second addition to Eagle Pass, and re-
submit their request for your approval, you have an opportunity to apply some
rather severe pressure on Swift to complete the various incomplete jobs they have
been ignoring in the current part of Eagle Pass.
The developer and the builder both have economic considerations that are
very important to them right now: the $5 million in additional revenue that would
come from council approval for the Second Edition plan. This gives you some
leverage to force compliance with at least some of the issues in the petitions
you have received from Eagle Pass residents. The Council, and the city
government in general (including the City Attorney) have responsibilities for the
safety of residents and an obligation to make living here less difficult. The
residents have an obligation to pay taxes (about $500,000 per year for many years
into the future in total from this one development) and to attempt to secure a
safe and pleasant environment.
My suggestion is for the council to meet with the builder and the developer and
let them know that the Second Edition is not going to happen unless and until the
issues covered in the petitions are solved first. If some issues cannot be
solved, or don't make sense to the council, they could be set aside.
Mr. Hoeft seems to prefer that we all sue one another. This is certainly a way to
make life much more difficult for individuals, and much more profitable for
attorneys. Many of us have had to resort to threats of legal action, letters to
various official bodies, etc. in order to have simple things completed on our
Swift-built homes. This is painful, expensive, and troublesome. It seems to me
that the council can impose its powers to withhold approval instead, and win the
endorsement of your voting citizens. The potential future citizens in the second
addition don't vote yet, as you know.
Bert Casper bertcasper@qwest.net
651-429-7662
6979 Eagle Trail Centerville, MN 55038
7/25/01
.~.
I t
\ ~\
r
. , ,
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Teresa Bender, Clerk/Treasurer
SUBJECT: 2002 Budget
DATE: July 25, 2001
Attached, please find Minnesota Statue 275.065, Proposed property taxes, notice.
Subdivision 1 refers to the requirements of the City in having to adopt a proposed budget,
by resolution, prior to September 15,2001 for the year 2002.
Mr. Palzer and I have discussed this matter and desire to draft a preliminary budget for
Council consideration at a work session to be scheduled by Council in early August.
Staff will be contacting all Committees/Commission to ascertain their budgets prior to
same.
Council needs to schedule a work session to discuss the preliminary budget.
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
Page 1 of 14
Minnesota Statutes 2000, Table of Chapters
Table of contents for Chapter 275
275.065 Proposed property taxes; notice.
Subdivision 1. Proposed levy. (a) Notwithstanding
any law or charter to the contrary, on or before September 15,
each taxing authority, other than a school district, shall adopt
a proposed budget and shall certify to the county auditor the
proposed or, in the case of a town, the final property tax levy
for taxes payable in the following year.
(b) On or before September 30, each school district shall
certify to the county auditor the proposed property tax levy for
taxes payable in the following year. The school district shall
certify the proposed levy as:
(1) the state determined school levy amount as prescribed
under section 126C.13, subdivision 2j
(2) voter approved referendum and debt leviesj and
(3) the sum of the remaining school levies, or the maximum
levy limitation certified by the commissioner of children,
families, and learning according to section 126C.48, subdivision
1, less the amounts levied under clauses (1) and (2).
(c) If the board of estimate and taxation or any similar
board that establishes maximum tax levies for taxing
jurisdictions within a first class city certifies the maximum
property tax levies for funds under its jurisdiction by charter
to the county auditor by September 15, the city shall be deemed
to have certified its levies for those taxing jurisdictions.
(d) For purposes of this section, "taxing authority"
includes all home rule and statutory cities, towns, counties,
school districts, and special taxing districts as defined in
section 275.066. Intermediate school districts that levy a tax
under chapter 124 or 136D, joint powers boards established under
sections 123A.44 to 123A.446, and common school districts No.
323, Franconia, and No. 815, Prinsburg, are also special taxing
districts for purposes of this section.
Subd. 1a. Overlapping jurisdictions. In the case of
a taxing authority lying in two or more counties, the home
county auditor shall certify the proposed levy and the proposed
local tax rate to the other county auditor by September 20. The
home county auditor must estimate the levy or rate in preparing
the notices required in subdivision 3, if the other county has
not certified the appropriate information. If requested by the
home county auditor, the other county auditor must furnish an
estimate to the home county auditor.
Subd. lb. Repealed, 1992 c 511 art 3 s 9
Subd. 1c.
Levy; shared, merged, consolidated services.
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/2 7 5 /065 .html
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
If two or more taxing authorities are in the process of
negotiating an agreement for sharing, merging, or consolidating
services between those taxing authorities at the time the
proposed levy is to be certified under subdivision 1, each
taxing authority involved in the negotiation shall certify its
total proposed levy as provided in that subdivision, including a
notification to the county auditor of the specific service
involved in the agreement which is not yet finalized. The
_affected taxing authorities may amend their proposed levies
under subdivision 1 until October 10 for levy amounts relating
only to the specific service involved.
Subd. 2. Repealed, lSp1989 c 1 art 9 s 85
Subd. 3. Notice of proposed property taxes. (a) The
county auditor shall prepare and the county treasurer shall
deliver after November 10 and on or before November 24 each
year, by first class mail to each taxpayer at the address listed
on the county's current year's assessment roll, a notice of
proposed property taxes.
(b) The commissioner of revenue shall prescribe the form of
the notice.
(c) The notice must inform taxpayers that it contains the
amount of property taxes each taxing authority proposes to
collect for taxes payable the following year. In the case of a
town, or in the case of the state determined portion of the
school district levy, the final tax amount will be its proposed
tax. The notice must clearly state that each taxing authority,
including regional library districts established under section
134.201, and including the metropolitan taxing districts as
defined in paragraph (i), but excluding all other special taxing
districts and towns, will hold a public meeting to receive
public testimony on the proposed budget and proposed or final
property tax levy, or, in case of a school district, on the
current budget and proposed property tax levy. It must clearly
state the time and place of each taxing authority's meeting and
an address where comments will be received by mail.
(d) The notice must state for each parcel:
(1) the market value of the property as determined under
section 273.11, and used for computing property taxes payable in
the following year and for taxes payable in the current year as
each appears in the records of the county assessor on November 1
of the current year; and, in the case of residential property,
whether the property is classified as homestead or
nonhomestead. The notice must clearly inform taxpayers of the
years to which the market values apply and that the values are
final values;
(2) the items listed below, shown separately by county,
city or town, state determined school tax net of the education
homestead credit under section 273.1382, voter approved school
levy, other local school levy, and the sum of the special taxing
districts, and as a total of all taxing authorities:
(i) the actual tax for taxes payable in the current year;
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/2 7 5/065 .html
Page 2 of 14
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
Page 3 of 14
(ii) the tax change due to spending factors, defined as the
proposed tax minus the constant spending tax amount;
(iii) the tax change due to other factors, defined as the
constant spending tax amount minus the actual current year tax;
and
(iv) the proposed tax amount.
In the case of a town or the state determined school tax,
the final tax shall also be its proposed tax unless the town
changes its levy at a special town meeting under section
365.52. If a school district has certified under section
126C.17, subdivision 9, that a referendum will be held in the
school district at the November general election, the county
auditor must note next to the school district's proposed amount
that a referendum is pending and that, if approved by the
voters, the tax amount may be higher than shown on the notice.
In the case of the city of Minneapolis, the levy for the
Minneapolis library board and the levy for Minneapolis park and
recreation shall be listed separately from the remaining amount
of the city's levy. In the case of a parcel where tax increment
or the fiscal disparities areawide tax under chapter 276A or
473F applies, the proposed tax levy on the captured value or the
proposed tax levy on the tax capacity subject to the areawide
tax must each be stated separately and not included in the sum
of the special taxing districts; and
(3) the increase or decrease between the total taxes
payable in the current year and the total proposed taxes,
expressed as a percentage.
For purposes of this section, the amount of the tax on
homesteads qualifying under the senior citizens' property tax
deferral program under chapter 290B is the total amount of
property tax before subtraction of the deferred property tax
amount.
(e) The notice must clearly state that the proposed or
final taxes do not include the following:
(1) special assessments;
(2) levies approved by the voters after the date the
proposed taxes are certified, including bond referenda, school
district levy referenda, and levy limit increase referenda;
(3) amounts necessary to pay cleanup or other costs due to
a natural disaster occurring after the date the proposed taxes
are certified;
(4) amounts necessary to pay tort judgments against the
taxing authority that become final after the date the proposed
taxes are certified; and
(5) the contamination tax imposed on properties which
received market value reductions for contamination.
(f) Except as provided in subdivision 7, failure of the
county auditor to prepare or the county treasurer to deliver the
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/275/065.html
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
Page 4 of 14
notice as required in this section does not invalidate the
proposed or final tax levy or the taxes payable pursuant to the
tax levy.
(g) If the notice the taxpayer receives under this section
lists the property as nonhomestead, and satisfactory
documentation is provided to the county assessor by the
applicable deadline, and the property qualifies for the
homestead classification in that assessment year, the assessor
shall reclassify the property to homestead for taxes payable in
the following year.
(h) In the case of class 4 residential property used as a
residence for lease or rental periods of 30 days or more, the
taxpayer must either:
(1) mail or deliver a copy of the notice of proposed
property taxes to each tenant, renter, or lessee; or
(2) post a copy of the notice in a conspicuous place on the
premises of the property.
The notice must be mailed or posted by the taxpayer by
November 27 or within three days of receipt of the notice,
whichever is later. A taxpayer may notify the county treasurer
of the address of the taxpayer, agent, caretaker, or manager of
the premises to which the notice must be mailed in order to
fulfill the requirements of this paragraph.
(i) For purposes of this subdivision, subdivisions 5a and
6, "metropolitan special taxing districts" means the following
taxing districts in the seven-county metropolitan area that levy
a property tax for any of the specified purposes listed below:
(1) metropolitan council under section 473.132, 473.167,
473.249, 473.325, 473.446, 473.521, 473.547, or 473.834;
(2) metropolitan airports commission under section 473.667,
473.671, or 473.672; and
(3) metropolitan mosquito control commission under section
473.711.
For purposes of this section, any levies made by the
regional rail authorities in the county of Anoka, Carver,
Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, or Washington under chapter
398A shall be included with the appropriate county's levy and
shall be discussed at that county's public hearing.
(j) If a statutory or home rule charter city or a town has
exercised the local levy option provided by section 473.388,
subdivision 7, it may include in the notice of its proposed
taxes the amount of its proposed taxes attributable to its
exercise of the option. In the first year of the city or town's
exercise of this option, the statement shall include an estimate
of the reduction of the metropolitan council's tax on the parcel
due to exercise of that option. The metropolitan council's levy
shall be adjusted accordingly.
Subd. 3a.
Constant spending levy amount.
(a) For
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/2 75/065 .html
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
Page 5 of 14
purposes of this section, "constant spending levy amount" for a
county, city, town, or special taxing district means the
property tax levy that the taxing authority would need to levy
so that the sum of (i) its levy, including its fiscal
disparities distribution levy under section 276A.06, subdivision
3, clause (a), or 473F.08, subdivision 3, clause (a), plus (ii)
its property tax aid amounts, would remain constant from the
current year to the proposed year, taking into account the
_fiscal disparities distribution levy amounts and the property
tax aid amounts that have been certified for the proposed year.
For the purposes of this paragraph, property tax aids include
homestead and agricultural credit aid under section 273.1398,
subdivision 2, local government aid under section 477A.013,
county criminal justice aid under section 477A.0121, and family
preservation aid under section 477A.0122.
(b) For the state determined school tax, "constant spending
levy amount" is the same as the proposed tax.
(c) For the voter approved school levy, "constant spending
levy amount" is the result of the following computation: (i)
compute the current year's revenue per pupil in average daily
membership as the ratio of the voter approved referendum and
debt service levy plus aid revenue to the number of pupils in
average daily membership, as estimated at the time of levy
certification the previous December; (ii) compute the proposed
year's levy ratio as ratio of the proposed year's levy
limitation for voter approved referendum and debt service
revenue to the maximum referendum and debt service levy plus aid
revenue for the proposed year, at the time of proposed levy
certification in September; and (iii) compute the "constant
spending levy amount" as the product of the current year's
revenue per pupil from clause (i) times the proposed year's levy
ratio from clause (ii) times the proposed year's pupils in
average daily membership.
(d) For the sum of all other school levies not included in
paragraph (b) or (c), "constant spending levy amount" is the
result of the following computation: (i) compute the current
year's revenue per pupil in average daily membership as the
ratio of the levy plus associated aid revenue to the number of
pupils in average daily membership, as estimated at the time of
levy certification the previous December; (ii) compute the
proposed year's levy ratio as ratio of the proposed year's levy
limitation to the maximum levy plus associated aid revenue for
the proposed year, estimated at the time of proposed levy
certification in September; and (iii) compute the "constant
spending levy amount" as the product of the current year's
revenue per pupil from clause (i) times the proposed year's levy
ratio from clause (ii) times the proposed year's pupils in
average daily membership.
(e) Each year, the commissioner of children, families, and
learning must compute and report to the county auditor each
school district's constant spending levy amounts by September
30. In no case shall a constant spending levy amount be less
than $0. For the purposes of this subdivision, school homestead
and agricultural credit aid under section 273.1398, subdivision
2, shall be included in the other school levy category. For
purposes of this subdivision, the school fiscal disparities
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/27 5/065 .html
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
distribution levy shall be apportioned proportionately among
levy categories.
(f) For the tax increment financing tax, and the fiscal
disparities tax, the "constant spending levy amount" is the same
as the proposed tax.
Subd. 4. Costs. If the reasonable cost of the county
_auditor's services and the cost of preparing and mailing the
notice required in this section exceed the amount distributed to
the county by the commissioner of revenue to administer this
section, the taxing authority must reimburse the county for the
excess cost. The excess cost must be apportioned between taxing
jurisdictions as follows:
(1) one-third is allocated to the countYi
(2) one-third is allocated to cities and towns within the
countYi and
(3) one-third is allocated to school districts within the
county.
The amounts in clause (2) must be further apportioned among
the cities and towns in the proportion that the number of
parcels in the city and town bears to the number of parcels in
all the cities and towns within the county. The amount in
clause (3) must be further apportioned among the school
districts in the proportion that the number of parcels in the
school district bears to the number of parcels in all school
districts within the county.
Subd. 5. Repealed, lSp1989 c 1 art 9 s 85
Subd. 5a. Public advertisement. (a) A city that has
a population of more than 2,500, county, a metropolitan special
taxing district as defined in subdivision 3, paragraph (i), a
regional library district established under section 134.201, or
school district shall advertise in a newspaper a notice of its
intent to adopt a budget and property tax levy or, in the case
of a school district, to review its current budget and proposed
property taxes payable in the following year, at a public
hearing. The notice must be published not less than two
business days nor more than six business days before the hearing.
The advertisement must be at least one-eighth page in size
of a standard-size or a tabloid-size newspaper. The
advertisement must not be placed in the part of the newspaper
where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. The
advertisement must be published in an official newspaper of
general circulation in the taxing authority. The newspaper
selected must be one of general interest and readership in the
community, and not one of limited subject matter. The
advertisement must appear in a newspaper that is published at
least once per week.
For purposes of this section, the metropolitan special
taxing district's advertisement must only be published in the
Minneapolis Star and Tribune and the Saint Paul pioneer Press.
http://www.revisor.1eg.state.mn.us/stats/2 75/065 .html
Page 6 of 14
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
(b) The advertisement for school districts, metropolitan
special taxing districts, and regional library districts must be
in the following form, except that the notice for a school
district may include references to the current budget in regard
to proposed property taxes.
"NOTICE OF
PROPOSED PROPERTY TAXES
(School District/Metropolitan
Special Taxing District/Regional
Library District) of .........
The governing body of ........ will soon hold budget hearings
and vote on the property taxes for (metropolitan special taxing
district/regional library district services that will be
provided in (year)/school district services that will be
provided in (year) and (year)).
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
All concerned citizens are invited to attend a public hearing
and express their opinions on the proposed (school
district/metropolitan special taxing district/regional library
district) budget and property taxes, or in the case of a school
district, its current budget and proposed property taxes,
payable in the following year. The hearing will be held on
(Month/Day/Year) at (Time) at (Location, Address)."
(c) The advertisement for cities and counties must be in
the following form.
"NOTICE OF PROPOSED
TOTAL BUDGET AND PROPERTY TAXES
The (city/county) governing body or board of commissioners will
hold a public hearing to discuss the budget and to vote on the
amount of property taxes to collect for services the
(city/county) will provide in (year).
SPENDING: The total budget amounts below compare
(city's/county's) (year) total actual budget with the amount the
(city/county) proposes to spend in (year).
(Year) Total
Actual Budget
Proposed (Year)
Budget
Change from
(Year) - (Year)
$.. . . . . .
$. . . . . . .
~
. . . 0
TAXES: The property tax amounts below compare that portion of
the current budget levied in property taxes in (city/county) for
(year) with the property taxes the (city/county) proposes to
collect in (year).
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/2 7 5/065 .html
Page 7 of 14
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
Page 8 of 14
(Year) Property
Taxes
Proposed (Year)
Property Taxes
Change from
(Year)-(Year)
$. . . . . . .
$. . . . . . .
!l-
. . . 0
ATTEND THE PUBLIC HEARING
All (city/county) residents are invited to attend the public
hearing of the (city/county) to express your opinions on the
budget and the proposed amount of (year) property taxes. The
hearing will be held on:
(Month/Day/Year/Time)
(Location/Address)
If the discussion of the budget cannot be completed, a time and
place for continuing the discussion will be announced at the
hearing. You are also invited to send your written comments to:
(City/County)
(Location/Address) "
(d) For purposes of this subdivision, the budget amounts
listed on the advertisement mean:
(1) for cities, the total government fund expenditures, as
defined by the state auditor under section 471.6965, less any
expenditures for improvements or services that are specially
assessed or charged under chapter 429, 430, 435, or the
provisions of any other law or charter; and
(2) for counties, the total government fund expenditures,
as defined by the state auditor under section 375.169, less any
expenditures for direct payments to recipients or providers for
the human service aids listed below:
(i) Minnesota family investment program under chapters 256J
and 256Ki
(ii) medical assistance under sections 256B.041,
subdivision 5, and 256B.19, subdivision Ii
(iii) general assistance medical care under section
256D.03, subdivision 6i
(iv) general assistance under section 256D.03, subdivision
2 ;
(v) emergency assistance under section 256J.48;
(vi) Minnesota supplemental aid under section 256D.36,
subdivision 1;
(vii) preadmission screening under section 256B.0911, and
alternative care grants under section 256B.0913;
http://www.revisor.1eg.state.mn.us/stats/27 5/065 .html
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
Page 9 of 14
(viii) general assistance medical care claims processing,
medical transportation and related costs under section 256D.03,
subdivision 4;
(ix) medical transportation and related costs under section
256B.0625, subdivisions 17 to 18a;
(x) group residential housing under section 2561.05,
subdivision 8, transferred from programs in clauses (iv) and
(vi); or
(xi) any successor programs to those listed in clauses (i)
to (x).
(e) A city with a population of over 500 but not more than
2,500 must advertise by posted notice as defined in section
645.12, subdivision 1. The advertisement must be posted at the
time provided in paragraph (a). It must be in the form required
in paragraph (b).
(f) For purposes of this subdivision, the population of a
city is the most recent population as determined by the state
demographer under section 4A.02.
(g) The commissioner of revenue, subject to the approval of
the chairs of the house and senate tax committees, shall
prescribe the form and format of the advertisement.
Subd. 6. Public hearing; adoption of budget and levy.
(a) For purposes of this section, the following terms shall
have the meanings given:
(1) "Initial hearing" means the first and primary hearing
held to discuss the taxing authority's proposed budget and
proposed property tax levy for taxes payable in the following
year, or, for school districts, the current budget and the
proposed property tax levy for taxes payable in the following
year.
(2) "Continuation hearing" means a hearing held to complete
the initial hearing, if the initial hearing is not completed on
its scheduled date.
(3) "Subsequent hearing" means the hearing held to adopt
the taxing authority's final property tax levy, and, in the case
of taxing authorities other than school districts, the final
budget, for taxes payable in the following year.
(b) Between November 29 and December 20, the governing
bodies of a city that has a population over 500, county,
metropolitan special taxing districts as defined in subdivision
3, paragraph (i), and regional library districts shall each hold
an initial public hearing to discuss and seek public comment on
its final budget and property tax levy for taxes payable in the
following year, and the governing body of the school district
shall hold an initial public hearing to review its current
budget and proposed property tax levy for taxes payable in the
following year. The metropolitan special taxing districts shall
be required to hold only a single joint initial public hearing,
the location of which will be determined by the affected
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/27 5/065 .html
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
metropolitan agencies.
(c) The initial hearing must be held
scheduled on a day other than Saturday.
be held on a Sunday.
after 5:00 p.m. if
No initial hearing may
(d) At the initial hearing under this subdivision, the
percentage increase in property taxes proposed by the taxing
_authority, if any, and the specific purposes for which property
tax revenues are being increased must be discussed. During the
discussion, the governing body shall hear comments regarding a
proposed increase and explain the reasons for the proposed
increase. The public shall be allowed to speak and to ask
questions. At the public hearing, the school district must also
provide and discuss information on the distribution of its
revenues by revenue source, and the distribution of its spending
by program area.
(e) If the initial hearing is not completed on its
scheduled date, the taxing authority must announce, prior to
adjournment of the hearing, the date, time, and place for the
continuation of the hearing. The continuation hearing must be
held at least five business days but no more than 14 business
days after the initial hearing. A continuation hearing may not
be held later than December 20 except as provided in paragraphs
(f) and (g). A continuation hearing must be held after 5:00
p.m. if scheduled on a day other than Saturday. No continuation
hearing may be held on a Sunday.
(f) The governing body of a county shall hold its initial
hearing on the first Thursday in December each year, and may
hold additional initial hearings on other dates before December
20 if necessary for the convenience of county residents. If the
county needs a continuation of its hearing, the continuation
hearing shall be held on the third Tuesday in December. If the
third Tuesday in December falls on December 21, the county's
continuation hearing shall be held on Monday, December 20.
(g) The metropolitan special taxing districts shall hold a
joint initial public hearing on the first Wednesday of
December. A continuation hearing, if necessary, shall be held
on the second Wednesday of December even if that second
Wednesday is after December 10.
(h) The county auditor shall provide for the coordination
of initial and continuation hearing dates for all school
districts and cities within the county to prevent conflicts
under clauses (i) and (j).
(i) By August 10, each school board and the board of the
regional library district shall certify to the county auditors
of the counties in which the school district or regional library
district is located the dates on which it elects to hold its
initial hearing and any continuation hearing. If a school board
or regional library district does not certify these dates by
August 10, the auditor will assign the initial and continuation
hearing dates. The dates elected or assigned must not conflict
with the initial and continuation hearing dates of the county or
the metropolitan special taxing districts.
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/2 7 5/065 .html
Page 10 of 14
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
(j) By August 20, the county auditor shall notify the
clerks of the cities within the county of the dates on which
school districts and regional library districts have elected to
hold their initial and continuation hearings. At the time a
city certifies its proposed levy under subdivision 1 it shall
certify the dates on which it elects to hold its initial hearing
and any continuation hearing. Until September 15, the first and
second Mondays of December are reserved for the use of the
cities. If a city does not certify its hearing dates by
September IS, the auditor shall assign the initial and
continuation hearing dates. The dates elected or assigned for
the initial hearing must not conflict with the initial hearing
dates of the county, metropolitan special taxing districts,
regional library districts, or school districts within which the
city is located. To the extent possible, the dates of the
city's continuation hearing should not conflict with the
continuation hearing dates of the county, metropolitan special
taxing districts, regional library districts, or school
districts within which the city is located. This paragraph does
not apply to cities of 500 population or less.
(k) The county initial hearing date and the city,
metropolitan special taxing district, regional library district,
and school district initial hearing dates must be designated on
the notices required under subdivision 3. The continuation
hearing dates need not be stated on the notices.
(1) At a subsequent hearing, each county, school district,
city over 500 population, and metropolitan special taxing
district may amend its proposed property tax levy and must adopt
a final property tax levy. Each county, city over 500
population, and metropolitan special taxing district may also
amend its proposed budget and must adopt a final budget at the
subsequent hearing. The final property tax levy must be adopted
prior to adopting the final budget. A school district is not
required to adopt its final budget at the subsequent hearing.
The subsequent hearing of a taxing authority must be held on a
date subsequent to the date of the taxing authority's initial
public hearing. If a continuation hearing is held, the
subsequent hearing must be held either immediately following the
continuation hearing or on a date subsequent to the continuation
hearing. The subsequent hearing may be held at a regularly
scheduled board or council meeting or at a special meeting
scheduled for the purposes of the subsequent hearing. The
subsequent hearing of a taxing authority does not have to be
coordinated by the county auditor to prevent a conflict with an
initial hearing, a continuation hearing, or a subsequent hearing
of any other taxing authority. All subsequent hearings must be
held prior to five working days after December 20 of the levy
year. The date, time, and place of the subsequent hearing must
be anr.ounced at the initial public hearing or at the
continuation hearing.
(m) The property tax levy certified under section 275.07 by
a city of any population, county, metropolitan special taxing
district, regional library district, or school district must not
exceed the proposed levy determined under subdivision I, except
by an amount up to the sum of the following amounts:
(1) the amount of a school district levy whose voters
http://www.revisor.1eg.state.mn.us/stats/27 5/065 .html
Page 11 of 14
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
approved a referendum to increase taxes under section 123B.63,
subdivision 3, or 126C.17, subdivision 9, after the proposed
levy was certified;
(2) the amount of a city or county levy approved by the
voters after the proposed levy was certified;
(3) the amount of a levy to pay principal and interest on
_bonds approved by the voters under section 475.58 after the
proposed levy was certified;
(4) the amount of a levy to pay costs due to a natural
disaster occurring after the proposed levy was certified, if
that amount is approved by the commissioner of revenue under
subdivision 6a;
(5) the amount of a levy to pay tort judgments against a
taxing authority that become final after the proposed levy was
certified, if the amount is approved by the commissioner of
revenue under subdivision 6a;
(6) the amount of an increase in levy limits certified to
the taxing authority by the commissioner of children, families,
and learning or the commissioner of revenue after the proposed
levy was certified; and
(7) the amount required under section 126C.55.
(n) This subdivision does not apply to towns and special
taxing districts other than regional library districts and
metropolitan special taxing districts.
(0) Notwithstanding the requirements of this section, the
employer is required to meet and negotiate over employee
compensation as provided for in chapter 179A.
Subd. 6a. Approval of commissioner. (a) A taxing
authority may appeal to the commissioner of revenue for
authorization to levy an amount over the amount of the proposed
levy. The taxing authority must provide evidence satisfactory
to the commissioner that it has incurred costs for the purposes
specified in paragraph (b). The commissioner may approve an
increase in the taxing authority's levy of up to the amount of
costs incurred or a lesser amount determined by the
commissioner. The commissioner's decision is final.
(b) A le'TY addition may be made under paragraph (a) for the
following costs incurred after the proposed levy is certified:
(1) the unreimbursed costs to satisfy judgments rendered against
the taxing authority by a court of competent jurisdiction in a
tort action in excess of $50,000 or ten percent of the current
year's proposed certified levy whichever is less; and (2) the
costs incurred in clean up of a natural disaster. For purposes
of this SUbdivision, "natural disaster" includes the occurrence
or threat of widespread or severe damage, injury, or loss of
life or property resulting from causes such as earthquake, fire,
flood, windstorm, wave action, oil spill, water contamination,
air contamination, or drought.
Subd. 6b.
Joint public hearings. Notwithstanding any
http://www.revisor.1eg.state.mn.us/stats/27 5/065 .htrnl
Page 12 of 14
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
other provision of law, any city with a population of 10,000 and
over, may conduct a more comprehensive public hearing than is
contained in subdivision 6 by including a board member from the
county, a board member from the school district located within
the city's boundary, and a representative of the metropolitan
council, if the city is in the metropolitan area, as defined in
section 473.121, subdivision 2, at the city's public hearing.
All provisions regarding the public hearings under subdivision 6
_are applicable to the joint public hearings under this
subdivision.
Upon the adoption of a resolution by the governing body of
the city to hold a joint hearing, the city shall notify the
county, the school district, and the metropolitan council if the
city is in the metropolitan area, of the decision to hold a
joint public hearing and request a board member from each of
those taxing authorities, and the member or the designee of the
metropolitan council if applicable, to be at the joint hearing.
If the city is located in more than one county, the city may
choose to request a county board member from each county or only
from the county containing the majority of the city's market
value. If more than one school district is partially or totally
located within the city, the city may choose to request a school
district board member from each school district, or a board
member only from the school district containing the majority of
the city's market value. If, as a result of requests under this
subdivision, there are not sufficient board members in the
county or the school district to attend the joint hearing, the
county or school district may send a nonelected person working
for its taxing authority to speak on the authority's behalf.
The city may also invite each state senator and representative
who represents the city, or a portion of the city, to come to
the joint hearing.
The primary purpose of the joint hearing is to discuss the
city's budget and property tax levy. The county and school
district officials, and metropolitan council representative, if
the city is in the metropolitan area, should be prepared to
answer questions relevant to its budget and levy and the effect
that its levy has on the property owners in the city.
If a city conducts a hearing under this subdivision, this
hearing is in lieu of the initial hearing required under
subdivision 6. However, the city is still required to adopt its
proposed property tax levy at a subsequent hearing as provided
under subdivision 6. The hearings under this subdivision do not
relieve a county, school district, or the metropolitan council
of the requirement to hold its individual hearing under
subdivision 6.
Subd. 7. Certification of compliance. At the time
the taxing authority certifies its tax levy under section
275.07, it shall certify to the commissioner of revenue its
compliance with this section. The certification must contain
the information required by the commissioner of revenue to
.determine compliance with this section. If the commissioner
determines that the taxing authority has failed to substantially
comply with the requirements of this section, the commissioner
of revenue shall notify the county auditor. The decision of the
commissioner is final. When fixing rates under section 275.08
http://www.revisor.1eg.state.mn.us/stats/27 5/065 .html
Page 13 of 14
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
for a taxing authority that has not complied with this section,
the county auditor must use the taxing authority's previous
year's levy, plus any additional amounts necessary to pay
principal and interest on general obligation bonds of the taxing
authority for which its taxing powers have been pledged if the
bonds were issued before 1989.
Subd. 8. Hearing. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, Ramsey county, the city of St. Paul, and
independent school district No. 625 are authorized to and shall
hold their initial public hearing jointly. The hearing must be
held on the second Tuesday of December each year. The
advertisement required in subdivision 5a may be a joint
advertisement. The hearing is otherwise subject to the
requirements of this section.
Ramsey county is authorized to hold an additional initial
hearing or hearings as provided under this section, provided
that any additional hearings must not conflict with the initial
or continuation hearing dates of the other taxing districts.
However, if Ramsey county elects not to hold such additional
initial hearing or hearings, the joint initial hearing required
by this subdivision must be held in a St. Paul location
convenient to residents of Ramsey county.
HIST: 1988 c 719 art 5 s 30; lSp1989 c 1 art 2 s 11; art 9 s
31-38; 1990 c 604 art 3 s 23-26; 1991 c 130 s 28,37; 1991 c 199
art 2 s 20; 1991 c 265 art 9 s 64-66; 1991 c 291 art 5 s 1-3;
1992 c 499 art 8 s 21; art 12 s 24,29; 1992 c 511 art 3 s 2-7;
art 5 s 8; 1992 c 603 s 24; 1993 c 224 art 1 s 30; 1993 c 271 s
3; 1993 c 375 art 3 s 24; art 7 s 9-12,29; art 12 s 10; 1994 c
416 art 1 s 25-27; 1994 c 510 art 1 s 8; 1994 c 587 art 3 s 10;
art 7 s 5; 1994 c 628 art 3 s 23,24; 1995 c 264 art 3 s 14,15;
art 4 s 4; art 16 s 12; lSp1995 c 3 art 1 s 52; art 16 s 13;
1996 c 305 art 1 s 60; 1996 c 455 art 5 s 1,2; 1996 c 471 art 3
s 16-18,52; art 11 s 2; 1997 c 31 art 3 s 9; 1997 c 231 art 4 s
1-8,12; art 14 s 2; 1998 c 254 art 1 s 79; 1998 c 389 art 3 s
12,13; 1998 c 397 art 11 s 3; 1999 c 159 s 126; 2000 c 260 s 44
Copyright 2000 by the Office of Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota.
http://www.revisor.1eg.state.mn.us/stats/2 7 5/065 .html
Page 14 of 14
7/25/01
Fete des Lacs
Revenue-Expenditures
2001
Sponsorships/Donations
Buttons/Craft Show/Political Reg.
$7,539.00
$465.00
$8,004.00
2001 Expenditures
Miscellaneous
Publications
Advertising/Printing
Professional Services
$4,158.23
$27.00
$773.93
$410.00
$5,369.16
Balance
$2,169.84
2001 FETE DES LACS SPONSORS
I Company/Organization/Individual
B & L Designs (Centerville Floral)
Bergman Companies, Inc.
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Assoc.
EXCEL Air Systems
Hugo Feed Mill & Elevator Co.
Resource Strategies Corporation
Richard S. Carlson & Assoc., LLP
Ms. Patricia Scott
Corner Express, Inc.
Magill Properties, Inc.
Star Express Wash, Inc.
Rehbein Excavating, Inc.
Lino Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce
Excel Energy
The Beulke Agency, Inc.
The County Bank
Goetz Landscape & Irrigation
Barna, Guzy & Steffen
Elite Trailers, Inc.
J.M. Bruggeman
Curves for Women
Waldoch Sports
Wilke Electric lTD.
Schlavin Family Chiropractic
Mr. & Mrs. Tom Peil
Mr. & Mrs. Tom Peil
John & Sanna Buckbee
1$ Amount I
$250.00
$50.00
$250.00
$250.00
$100.00
$100.00
$1,000.00
$39.00
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
$250.00
$250.00
$350.00
$100.00
$1,500.00
$500.00
$1,000.00
$250.00
$500.00
$100.00
$500.00 In Kind
$100.00
$100.00
$507.44 In Kind
$100.00
$100.00
Total
$8,546.44
- $1,007.44 In Kind
Political Contribution/Parade Registration
$7,539.00
+ $50.00
Craft Show/Button Revenue
$7,589.00
+ $415.00
$8,004.00
z
o
i=
~
....
!!2
C)
w
a:::
w
c
~
<C
Q.
0
... 0
c ci
j 10
0 ~
E
<C
CR-
lB
;:
"e
E
0
u
....
lB
-
c C
:l
0 ~
;;
ca ...
N Q)
'2 Q)
ca ii)
e>> "0
c
0 ~
'a
c::
III
Q
Q
<:t
....
~
..
0_
Cl)Q.
s:: ::I
o
Q.
rn
E
::I
c::
:0:;
III
a::
CI)
~
..J
CI)
CD-
"Q
....
S-
CD .
LL G)
_I>>
o~
"
s::
CD
";::
LL
d
E
(lj
Gl
_"2
8~
cno
.~ U
'1:: I::
1ijl\1
Cl.~
rn a;
::Em
S
Q
....
-
Q)
..,.
N
~
..
o
CI)
s::
o
Q.
rn
CD
N
s::
o
..
m
I::
o
1; 0
o 13
o e-., e
l\1 000 Q.
ii; .UEE 0
ti - 0 (/) - - .:
c: w E .!Il-Jii ()'ci B
-:~(lj~(lJ&i1-
lZ ::: .!Il1ij ~ C)..J ~
l!!:!Effi.= (/)<(.2 E
a." Q. cn (/) Gl .= co
xWOGll!!"",~LL
ww....oQ.::J-c:
....LLCl. 5 x mW':;:
Glo:::owmWl\1
EC)C)(/)....w-"':<:
O::Jl\1Ql.!!l.c=o
uJ:::Eo::cnl-3:cn
ci
U
S
10
N
*
G)
I>>
..,.
~
..
o
CI)
c
o
Co
rn
..
I/)
2:
i:i)
~
g Gl
(/) EE
1ii .:2 0
o ~ U
u:~ 15
.!!!~ Iii .
~-g ~~
jl<( l\1 -
ffiqj E B~
2,5iti.lJ! l\1'1ii
rnl3E!e, I!!>
c: 0:: <Ii (/) >- <( B
C) '-.....0) x
'13 8.m~ ~jw
o.=e......Wl\1.s
......ml-wQj......~
a!la~~~a-5j
mmwww:::io::
S
Q
10
..,..
ti
.E
l5ui
'Iii ,~
,21 ~
.!:E
a!l8
2t c: <II'ijj
l\1l\1t::Cl.
~E8.>.
-g 8lcn ~
j2"fi~
.tlImoa!l
~~i g
C>-;~1-
Cl.
......
......
g
rn
tb
c:<(
~a!I
m c:
Ci5~~
a!I~~
~~.2:'
::J cn c:
~"Eg
lnl\1U
~~11
ma:::1-
CJ>
I>>
I>>
~
..
o
!
o
Co
rn
"
'0
C)
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Full
07/24/01 11 :36 AM
Page 1
',?<4u.at'ii{;:eii",' Audit 2001
Fund 618
Revenue Total Budget
R 618-36200 Miscellaneous Revenues Budget $0.00 Total Year $415.00
Encumbered $0.00 Balance -$415.00
Debit Credit
Vendor Search Name Invoice ------Check------ Batch Name
3MARCH Comments Refer PO Begin $0.00
32001 Rec 5881 03-13-01 $0.00 $10.00
T. Peterson - Candy 0 0
Total 3MARCH $0.00 $10.00
Ending ($10.00)
Vendor Search Name Invoice ------Check------ Batch Name
6JUNE Comments Refer PO Begin ($10.00)
62001 Rec 6744 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $35.00
B & L DESIGNS (CENTERVILLE FL 0 0
62001 Rec 6745 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $35.00
KNOWLEDGE BEGINNINGS - CRA 0 0
62001 Rec 6767 6/27/016-27-01 $0.00 $25.00
KELLJE GRUBER - CRAFT SHOW - 0 0
Total 6JUNE $0.00 $95.00
Ending ($105.00)
Vendor Search Name Invoice ------Check------ Batch Name
7 JUL Y Comments Refer PO Begin ($105.00)
72001 Rec 6887 7/5/01 7-5-01 $0.00 $25.00
CRAFT SHOW/BUSINESS EXPO - 0 0
72001 Rec 6893 7/5/01 7-5-01 $0.00 $25.00
CRAFT SHOW/BUSINESS EXPR (1 0 0
72001 Rec 6891 7/5/017-5-01 $0.00 $50.00
CRAFT SHOW/BUSINESS EXPR - 0 0
72001 Rec 6892 7/5/01 7-5-01 $0.00 $25.00
CRAFT SHOW/BUSINESS EXPR - 0 0
72001 Rec 6919 7/16/017-12-01 $0.00 $10.00
2 FETE DES LACS BUTTONS 0 0
72001 Rec 6923 7/16/017-12-01 $0.00 $25.00
GRANT /DONNA PETERS - CRAFT 0 0
72001 Rec 6924 7/16/017-12-01 $0.00 $25.00
SAZI DISIGNS - CRAFT SHOW 0 0
72001 Rec 6917 7/16/017-12-01 $0.00 $5.00
1 FETE DES LACS BUTTON 0 0
72001 Rec 6941 7/19/017-19-01 $0.00 $50.00
VANDEVEER VOLUNTEER COMM 0 0
72001 Rec 6934 7/19/017-19-01 $0.00 $35.00
CURVES FOR WOMEN CRAFT/BU 0 0
72001 Rec 6936 7/19/017-19-01 $0.00 $5.00
FETE DES LACS BUTTON 0 0
72001 Rec 6938 7/19/017-19-01 $0.00 $5.00
FETE DES LACS BUTTON - TOM P 0 0
72001 Rec 6940 7/19/017-19-01 $0.00 $25.00
MARY LOU & TOM WILHARBER - 0 0
Total 7 JULY $0.00 $310.00
Ending ($415.00)
Control Act 618-25300 Unreser
Total Revenue
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Full
Audit 2001
Total R 618-36200 Miscellaneous Revenues
In Balance
$415.00
Total Year
$0.00
Ending
$0.00
07/24/0111:36AM
Page 2
$415.00
($415.00)
$415.00
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Full
07/24/01 11 :36 AM
Page 1
Audit 2001
Fund 618
Revenue Total Budget
R 618-36230 Contributions and Donations Budget $0.00 Total Year $7,339.00
Encumbered $0.00 Balance -$7,339.00
Debit Credit
Vendor Search Name Invoice ------Check----- Batch Name
4APRIL Comments Refer PO Begin $0.00
42001 Rec 5931 4/4/014-07-01 $0.00 $39.00
FETE DES LAC DONATION- P. SC 0 0
Total 4APRIL $0.00 $39.00
Ending ($39.00)
Vendor Search Name Invoice ------Check-m-- Batch Name
6JUNE Comments Refer PO Begin ($39.00)
62001 Rec 6751 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $100.00
CORNER EXPRESS - FETE DES L 0 0
62001 Rec 6719 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $1,000.00
RICHARD S. CARLSON & ASSOC. 0 0
62001 Rec 6720 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $100.00
RESOURCE STRATEGIES CORP- 0 0
62001 Rec 6721 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $100.00
HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR C 0 0
62001 Rec 6736 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $250.00
B & L DESIGNS (CENTERVILLE FL 0 0
62001 Rec 6737 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $250.00
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLI 0 0
62001 Rec 6738 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $250.00
EXCEL AIR SYSTEMS - FETE DES 0 0
62001 Rec 6739 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $50.00
BERGMAN COMPANIES, INC. - FE 0 0
62001 Rec 6749 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $100.00
STAR EXPRESS WASH INC. - FET 0 0
62001 Rec 6750 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $100.00
MAGILL PROPERTIES, INC. FETE 0 0
62001 Rec 6769 6/27/01 6-27-01 $0.00 $250.00
L1NO LAKES AREA CHAMBER OF 0 0
62001 Rec 6764 6/27/01 6-27-01 $0.00 $250.00
REHBINE EXCAVATING INC. - FET 0 0
Total 6JUNE $0.00 $2,800.00
Ending ($2,839.00)
Vendor Search Name Invoice ------Check------ Batch Name
7 JUL Y Comments Refer PO Begin ($2,839.00)
72001 Rec 6776 7/3/01 7-3-01 $0.00 $350.00
FETE DES LACS DONATION - XC 0 0
72001 Rec 6894 7/5/017-5-01 $0.00 $100.00
THE BEULKE AGENCY, INC - FET 0 0
72001 Rec 6895 7/5/017-5-01 $0.00 $1,500.00
THE COUNTY BANK - FETE DES L 0 0
72001 Rec 6912 7/16/017-12-01 $0.00 $1,000.00
BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, FETE 0 0
72001 Rec 6929 7/16/017-12-01 $0.00 $500.00
GOETZ LANDSCAPING FETE DE 0 0
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Full
07/24/01 11 :36 AM
Page 2
Audit 2001
72001 Rec 6947 7/19/017-19-01 $0.00 $100.00
JOHN & SANNA BUCKBEE - FETE 0 0
72001 Rec 6932 7/19/01 7-19-01 $0.00 $750.00
J.M. BRUGGEMAN COMPANIES & 0 0
72001 Rec 6933 7/19/017-19-01 $0.00 $100.00
CURVES FOR WOMEN - FETE DE 0 0
72001 Rec 6939 7/19/017-19-01 $0.00 $100.00
WILKE ELECTRIC, L TO - FETE DE 0 0
Total 7 JULY $0.00 $4,500.00
Ending ($7,339.00)
Control Act 618-25300 Unreser Total R 618-36230 Contributions and $0.00 $7,339.00
Donations
In Balance Total Year $7,339.00 Ending ($7,339.00)
Total Revenue $0.00 $7,339.00
Fund 618
Expenditure
E 618-49000-300 professional Srvs
7 JULY
7 2001 Pay
CItY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Full
Audit 2001
Total Budget
Budget
Encumbered
$0.00 Total Year
$0.00 Balance
Vendor Search Name
comments
Invoice _...._Check...--. Batch Name
Refer pO
015921 6/28/01 070301
o 0
DOWN ON THE FAR
1/2 PYMT FOR PETTING ZOON
Control Act 618-25300 Unreser
Total
Expenditure
Total 7 JULY
Debit
Begin
$410.00
07/24101 11 :37 AM
Page 1
$410.00
_$410.00
Credit
$0.00
$0.00
~~
$410.00 $0.00
Ending $410.00
~~
$410.00 $0.00
Ending $410.00
In Balance
Total Year
Total E 618-49000-300 professional Srvs
$410.00
$410.00
$0.00
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Full
Audit 2001
Fund 618
Expenditure
Total Budget
Budget
Encumbered
$0.00 Total Year
$0.00 Balance
E 618-49000-340 Advertising & Printing
Vendor Search Name Invoice ......Check...... Batch Name
4APR1L Comments Refer PO
42001 Pay PRESS PUBLICA TIO 015639 4/11/0104-04-01
FESTIVAL ADS 0 0
Total 4APRIL
Vendor Search Name Invoice ......Check...-. Batch Name
6JUNE Comments Refer PO
6 2001 Pay THILL, JOHN 015815 5/31/01 060701
REIMBURSEMENT FOR FETE DE 0 0
62001 Pay DEVINE, RAY 015872 6/12/01062501
REIMBUSEMENT FOR FETE DES 0 0
Total 6JUNE
Vendor Search Name Invoice ......Check..-.. Batch Name
7 JULY Comments Refer PO
72001 Pay DEVINE, RAY 015922 6/28/01 070301
ADVERTISING EXP - BUTTONS F 0 0
72001 Pay FOREST LAKE PRIN 015926 7/2/01 070301
FLYERS FOR FETE DES LACS 0 0
Total 7 JULY
Control Act 618-25300 Unreser
Total E 618-49000-340 Advertising & Printing
In Balance Total Year $773.93
Total
Expenditure
07/24/0111:37 AM
Page 1
Debit
Begin
$399.60
$399.60
Ending
Begin
$46.31
$58.56
$104.87
Ending
Begin
$100.12
$169.34
$269.46
Ending
$773.93
Ending
$773.93
$773.93
-$773.93
Credit
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$399.60
$399.60
$0.00
$0.00 I
I
$0.00 I
$504.47
$504.47 I
$0.00 I
$0.00
I
$0.00 I
$773.93
$0.00 I
$773.93
$0.00
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Fun
07/24/0111:37 AM
Page 1
Audit 2001
E 618-49000-350 Ord., Pub. Hearings, etc.
Budget
Encumbered
$0.00 Total Year
$0.00 Balance
$27.00
_$27.00
Fund 618
Expenditure
Total Budget
Debit
Credit
2FEBRUARY
22001 Pay
Vendor Search Name
Comments
PRESS PUBLICA TIO
Meeting Re-Scheduling
Invoice ..____Check.--..- Batch Name
Refer PO
2092030015516 2/28/01 02-23-01
o 0
Begin
$27.00
$0.00
$0.00
Control Act 618-25300 Unreser
~~
Total 2FEBRUARY $27.00 $0.00
Ending $27.00
~
Total E 618-49000-350 O,d.. Pub. """9'. $27.00 $0.00
etc.
In Balance
Total Year
$27.00 Ending
~
$27.00
$27.00
$0.00
Total
Expenditure
07/24/01 11 :37 AM
Page 1
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Full
Audit 2001
Fund 618
Expenditure
Total Budget
$4,158.23
-$4,158.23
Budget
Encumbered
$0.00 Total Year
$0.00 Balance
E 618-49000-430 Miscellaneous
Debit
Vendor searchName Invoice ______Check------ Batch Name
2FEBRUARY Comments Refer PO Begin
22001 Pay JIMMY ALLEN EVEN FESTIVAL 015444 2/9/01 02-09-01 $600.00
BROKER'S FEES 0 0
Total 2FEBRUARY $600.00
Ending
Vendor Search Name Invoice ------C heck ------ Batch Name
3MARCH Comments Refer PO Begin
32001 Pay OFFICE MAX 015558 3J14J013-08-01 $28.74
Addr. Labels 0 0
32001 Pay SWEENEY, KRIS 015564 3/14/01 3-08-01 $1.29
MILEAGE -FETE DES LAC PACKE 0 0
32001 Pay U.S. POSTAL SERVI 015567 3/14/013-08-01 $74.74
POSTAGE - FETE DES LAC 0 0
Total 3MARCH $104.77
Ending
Vendor Search Name Invoice ______Check-- Batch Name
4APRIL Comments Refer PO Begin
42001 Pay DEVINE, KARLA 015667 4/25/01 042501 $20.00
FETE DES LACS MEETINGS 2-21 0 0
42001 Pay DEVINE, RAY 015668 4/25/01 042501 $30.00
FETE DES LACS MEETINGS 1-29, 0 0
42001 Pay PEIL, KATHY 015689 4/25J01 042501 $30.00
FETE DES LACS 1-29,2-21, & 3-1 0 0
42001 Pay REHBINE, MARY AN 015696 4/25/01 042501 $10.00
FETE DES LACS 1-29-01 0 0
42001 Pay SCOTT, PATRICIA 015698 4/25/01042501 $10.00
FETE DES LACS - 3-19-01 0 0
42001 Pay SWEENEY, TERRY 015701 4/25/01 042501 $30.00
FETE DES LACS 1-29,2-21 & 3-19 0 0
42001 Pay THILL, JOHN 015702 4/25/01 042501 $10.00
FETE DES LACS 1-29-01 0 0
42001 Pay TRAVIS, MONICA 015705 4J25/01 042501 $10.00
FETE DES LACS 2-21-01 0 0
Total 4APRIL $150.00
Ending
Vendor searchName Invoice ______Check------ Batch Name
5MAY Comments Refer PO Begin
52001 Pay HERR FAM\L Y AMU 015719 4/30/01 050301 $1,500.00
DEPOSIT ON CARNIVAL 0 0
Total 5MAY $1,500.00
Ending
Vendor searchName Invoice ______Check------ Batch Name
6JUNE Comments Refer PO Begin
62001 Pay THILL, JOHN 015815 5J31/01060701 $32.35
REIMBUSEMENT FOR FETE DES 0 0
Credit
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$600.00
$600.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$704.77
$704.77
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$854.77
$854.77
$0.00
$0.00
$2,354.77
$2,354.77
$0.00
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Full
07/24/0111:38 AM
Page 2
Audit 2001
62001 Pay THIll, JOHN 015815 5/31/01060701 $141.96 $0.00
REIMBUSEMENT FOR FETE DES 0 0
62001 Pay PRECISION FIRE SP 015816 5/31/01060701 $78.81 $0.00
REIMBURSE FOR COPIES FOR F 0 0
62001 Pay DEVINE, KARLA 015891 6/27/01062501 $18.15 $0.00
POSTAGE - FETE DES LACS CEL 0 0
62001 Pay NEIL ENTERPRISES, 21061548015909 6/27/01 062501 $274.46 $0.00
3" SNAPIN BUTTONS - FETE DES 0 0
Total 6JUNE $545.73 $0.00
Ending $2,900.50
Vendor SearchName Invoice ______Check----- Batch Name
7 JULY Comments Refer PO Begin $2,900.50
72001 Pay PRECISION FIRE SP 015923 6/28/01 070301 $51.41 $0.00
COPIES FOR FETE DES LACS & S 0 0
72001 Pay DEVINE, KARLA 015935 7/11/01070301 $60.00 $0.00
APRIL, MAY, & JUNE FETE DES L 0 0
72001 Pay DEVINE, RAY 015936 7/11/01070301 $60.00 $0.00
APRIL, MAY, JUNE - FETE DES LA 0 0
72001 Pay KIESELHORST, LISA 015945 7/11/01070301 $20.00 $0.00
JUNE - FETE DES LACS 0 0 i
PEll, KATHY i I
72001 Pay 015956 7/11/01070301 $60.00 $0.00
APRil, MAY & JUNE FETE DES L 0 0 i
72001 Pay SCOTT, PATRICIA 015960 7/11/01070301 $40.00 $0.00 I
MAY & JUNE FETE DES LACS 0 0
7 2001 Pay SWEENEY, TERRY 015966 7/11/01 070301 $40.00 $0.00 i
4-16-01 & 5-21-01 FETE DES LACS 0 0 I
72001 Pay THill, JOHN 015967 7/11/01 070301 $40.00 $0.00
MAY & JUNE FETE DES LACS ME 0 0
7 2001 Pay TOWN CRIER PROM 016017 71251017-19-01 $886.32 $0.00
FETE DES lACS 0 0
Total 7 JULY $1,257.73 $0.00
Ending $4,158.23
Control Act 618-25300 Unreser Total E 618-49000-430 Miscellaneous $4,158.23 $0.00
In Balance Total Year $4,158.23 Ending $4,156.23
Total Expenditure $4,156.23 $0.00
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Full
Audit 2001
Fund 618
$4,158.23
07/24/01 11 :38 AM
Page 3
$0.00
~.
#
NOT
APPROVED
PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
July 10, 2001
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Parks and Recreation Committee of the City
of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on July 10, 2001, at City Hall, 1880
Main Street. Chairperson Doug Porter called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.rn.
Present:
Chairperson Doug Porter
KarIa DeVine
Tom Lee
Brian Walter
Kathy Peil
Absent:
Wayne LeBlanc
Tedd Peterson
Staff:
Jill Lien
APPEARANCES
Mr. Chaymus KIang (7162 JvIill Road) and Mason Wurscher (7132 Gray Heron Drive)
appeared before the Parks and Recreation Committee to request permission to have
several bands play for four to six hours at one of the parks in town. Mr. Klang explained
that several youth have started bands, and they have no place to play. They are looking
for this to be a half-day event, where potentially hundreds of kids will come to listen to
their music. The style of music is somewhat comparable to what you would hear on 93X,
which is hard rock/metal. Mr. Wurscher commented that he works for A to Z Rental, and
he can get a stage, tent, lights, cables etc. for free. Their concerns were if there was a
need for any type ofpennits required, security issues, or any other concerns the Parks and
Recreation Committee may have. They were hoping to have this event sometime in mid
to late August, during the daytime hours.
After discussion the Committee expressed concerns over the following issues, and
requested Ms. Lien follow-up on the same:
1. Noise Permit
2. Police Department
3. Fire Department
4. Satellites
5. Clean-up
6. Liabilities - League ofMN Cities - Special Event Coverage
1
"
\
7. Parking
8. City Council Approval/Conditions
The Committee questioned Mr. Klang specifically ifbis own band would be willing to
play at the Grand Opening of the Wheels Park, if the whole six (6)-band option wouldn't
work. Mr. Klang commented that he would be happy to play at anytime. The Committee
thanked Mr. Klang and Mr. Wurscher for appearing before the Committee, and informed
them that Ms. Lien would get back to them after additional research had been done.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
June 6. 200 1 Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes
Motion by Mr. Lee, seconded by Ms. DeVine to approve the June 6, 2001 Parks and
Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Trail Map Brochures
Ms. DeVine explained that per her conversation with Mr. LeBlanc who had attended the
EDC meeting to see if they would be interested in sharing the fees and planning of the
brochure, that the EDC would like to see a more condensed version than what Mr.
LeBlanc had presented. They would like to see a one page brochure - tri-folded, as
presented by Ms. DeVine. Mr. Terway was going to bring a copy of Vadnais Heights'
trail map to Ms. DeVine, but she hasn't heard back from him as of yet. The Committee
elected to table this item at this time until Mr. LeBlanc could give his update.
Satellite Enclosures
Mr. Walter explained that he received a quote from Goetz Landscape for planting natural
barriers (bushes) around all of the satellites at the parks. The quote came in at
approximately $2,500, which inCludes installation. Mr. Walter explained that it would
take time for the natural barriers to grow and become established, but eventually
maintenance of these bushes will become an issue. Who will be responsible for trimming
and upkeep of these bushes at the parks? Mr. Walter questioned the use of the satellites
at Royal Meadows and Eagle Parks. Specifically, is there really a need for satellites at
these two (2) parks? After discussion, the Committee concurred that there is a need for
satellites at these two (2) parks. Additionally, if the Committee elected to remove the
satellites at the two (2) parks, then it would become an issue at the other parks that still
have them. The Committee decided to look at wood fencing on two (2) sides of each
satellite instead of natural barriers. This would be considerably less expensive. Mr.
Walter will check into pretreated, pre-made fence sections and report back at the next
meeting.
Ag-Lime and Fence Relocation at Laurie LaMotte Park
Ms. Lien explained that with the relocation of the fencing and backstops at LaMotte Park,
that additional ag-lime would be required. Mr. Peterson has left messages with the Little
2
,t
,
League several times, but they haven't called back. He was hoping they would be willing
to donate ag-lime as they have in the past, but he is having a difficult time just getting
through to them. Mr. Peterson had received a quote for 25 tons of ag-lime at a cost of
$432. Ms. Lien questioned Mr. March as to if this could come out of the maintenance
expenses. Mr. March approved this expense from the maintenance budget. Ms. Lien
commented that ultimately, this needs to be done by the end of July for the Fete des Lacs
Tournament.
Mr. Peterson received a quote from Modem Fence for the relocation of the backstops,
which came in $1,500 higher than what had been expected. Council already approved
$3,500. After discussio~ the following motion was made:
Motion by Mr. Porter, seconded by Ms. DeVine to request approval of an additional
$1,500 for installation costs for the relocation of the fencing at Laurie LaMotte
Park, due to the unavailability of the Public Works Department to perform the
labor as originally recommended to City Council (total project cost of $5,000). AD
in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Ms. DeVine requested Modem Fencing sign a performance agreement for work to be
completed by July 30th.
Wheels Park
a Follow-up on Wheels Park Meeting
b. Voting Tabulations
c. Proposed expenses
d. Rules and Regulations I Signage
e. Advisory Board
f. Grand Opening
g. Article in Quad
Ms. Lien explained there were 32 youth signed in for the Wheels Park Meeting. Included
in the packet was the voting form with the :final tabulations - most popular being circled.
The fun box was the most popular piece with 18 votes. Ms. Lien explained she was
requested to submit the proposed expenditures for the Wheels Park and the current
expenses to date, to City Council. Included were copies of the "Parks and Recreations
Proposed Expenditures for the Year 2001, and an updated "Park Fund" balance sheet.
Ms. Lien commented that interest had been added for the year 2000 on the balance sheet.
Additionally, staffis still researching the $7k overage from the year 2000, and whether it
needs to be expended from the 2001 Park Dedication Fees, or from the General Fund.
Per direction from Mr. March, the $7k overage was removed. Ms. Lien shared that the
total cost for the Laurie LaMotte Park Improvements is $181,180 - which does not
include shippinglbandling for the Wheels Park equipment. A breakdown of the proposed
Wheels Park equipment is as follows:
3
Skate Wave
Fun Box
Mini Half Pipe
Spine (12')
Quarter Pipe
Tax (6.5%)
Total
"
\
SunRamp Solutions
Breaker
Spine
Quarter Pipe (12')
$ 6,840
$11 ,240
$ 6,270
$ 5.260
$30,600
$30,600
+ 8.385
$38,985
+ 2534
$41,519 (Plus shipping/handling)
$2,195
$2,695
$3.495
$8,385
Ms. Lien explained she took the top four (4) choices from SkateWave, and the top three
(3) choices from SunRamp Solutions. Outside of the fact that these are the items the
youth picked, she recommended the "Spine" and the "Quarter Pipe" from both vendors.
She felt SunRamp Solutions would be better equipment for bicycles, while at the same
time, SkateWave would provide better equipment that is more suitable for skate-boards
and in-lines. This would allow both bikes and skateboards/in-Iines to use equipment at
the same time. Ms. Lien commented that the equipment from SkateWave didn't appear
to be the most suitable for bicycles.
Motion by Ms. Peil, seconded by Mr. Walter to request $42,000 from City Council
to purchase equipment for the Wheels Park at Laurie LaMotte Park. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimously.
Ms. Lien explained she had compiled a draft "Rules and Regulations" and requested the
Committee Members to review, comment, change or add to anything they felt necessary.
Ms. Lien commented that it was her understanding that the Advisory Board should only
be OBSERVING what is happening at the Wheels Park, and calling the appropriate
parties (police) when necessary. They are to be the "eyes and ears" of the park. She
explained that the Committee shouldn't place any member of the Advisory Board in
uncomfortable positions (i.e.: friends, enemies, siblings, etc.). There are six (6) youth
interested in being on the Advisory Board.
Ms. Lien explained that Mr. Peterson had been in contact with someone from the League
ofMN Cities and Tom Gross with Berkley Risk Administrators Company (brae)
regarding proper signage. Mr. Gross made several suggestions, including constructing
with 4" letters similar to highway signs. The letters should be reflective and have a
contrasting color to the background. He also recommended that the City Attorney and/or
the League ofJ\1N Cities review the signage before installation. Ms. Lien offered to
contact Brian with Gator Signs to see ifhe could make the sign, and how much it would
cost to do so.
The final "Rules and Regulations" are as tollows:
4
.'
I
1. Protective gear is strongly encouraged.
2. No drugs or alcohol.
3. No smoking or chewing tobacco.
4. No fighting.
5. No loitering.
6. No reckless behavior.
7. No profanity.
8. No stickers on park property/equipment.
9. No graffiti.
10. Not responsible for lost or stolen articles.
11. Only bikes, skateboards, roller-blades and in-line skates allowed.
12. Be responsible - maintain the park by cleaning up trash.
13. Be respectful of others and the park property.
14. RIDE/SKATE AT YOUR OWN RISK.
Anyone using the Wheels Park is asked to contact the Police if they
witness any inappropriate behavior.
THIS IS YOUR PARK, PLEASE TAKE CARE OF IT
FOR YOUR SAFETY (will be placed at the top ofthe sign).
The Committee discussed possible dates for a Grand Opening for the Wheels Park, and
elected to tentatively set the date for Saturday, August 11,2001 at 1 :00 p.m., subject to
delivery of the equipment from the vendors. Since the Committee was unsure of whether
the Council would approve the request for $42k for park equipment or not, they couldn't
direct Ms. Lien to order the equipment until after the Council Meeting on July 11, 2001.
At that, the Committee elected to hold a Special Meeting to pick out the equipment and
finalize any other issues related specifically to the Wheels Park on Monday, July 16th at
6:00 p.m. Ms. Lien will contact the vendors after Council's approval/denial to find out
their delivery time for the equipment. If at that time, it is determined that the vendors
cannot provide the equipment before August 11 th, the tentative date for the Grand
Opening would be changed to Saturday, August 18,2001.
Ms. Lien explained she had included the article published in the Quad for informational
purposes only. She noted some errors in the article, but overall it was a pretty good
article.
Budget
Tabled
NEW BUSINESS
Borowicz Request for Bon-fire at Acorn Creek Park
Ms. Lien distributed a letter received from Becki Borowicz (1861 Revoir St.) requesting
permission from the Parks and Recreation Committee to have a bon-fire in Acorn Creek
Park, for their annual block party on August 25th. Ms. Borowicz already obtained
5
'.
,
approval from Milo Bennett (Fire Chief). Mr. Bennett informed her that she needed to
obtain approval from the Parks and Recreation Committee.
After discussion, the following motion was made:
Motion by Mr. Porter, seconded by Mr. Lee to recommend to City Council denial of
the Borowicz's request to use Acorn Creek Park for a block party bon-fire. Porter,
Lee, Walter, Peil- yea. DeVine - abstain. Motion carried.
Ms. Lien will contact the Borowicz's.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
Monthly Financial Statement
Discussed previously.
Wargo Activities Update
Ms. Lien explained that there have been 90 - 100 kids at each program, with the
exception of the Canoeing/Kayaking, which has a limit of20. There wasn't a program on
July 3rd due to the Independence Holiday.
Set Agenda
1. Satellite Enclosures
2. Band Request
3. Budget
4. Wheels Park
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Mr. Walter, seconded by Mr. Porter to adjourn the July 10, 2001 Parks
and Recreation Committee Meeting. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jill Lien
Staff Liaison
6
Eagle Pass problems
Page 1 of 1
Teresa Bender
From: Bert Casper [bertcasper@qwest.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25,2001 12:07 PM
To: tbender@centervillemn.com; mayacat@qwest.net
Cc: James Halstrom
Subject: Eagle Pass problems
Now that Gorem is planning to re-plat the second addition to Eagle Pass, and re-
submit their request for your approval, you have an opportunity to apply some
rather severe pressure on Swift to complete the various incomplete jobs they have
been ignoring in the current part of Eagle Pass.
The developer and the builder both have economic considerations that are
very important to them right now: the $5 million in additional revenue that would
come from council approval for the Second Edition plan. This gives you some
leverage to force compliance with at least some of the issues in the petitions
you have received from Eagle Pass residents. The Council, and the city
government in general (including the City Attorney) have responsibilities for the
safety of residents and an obligation to make living here less difficult. The
residents have an obligation to pay taxes (about $500,000 per year for many years
into the future in total from this one development) and to attempt to secure a
safe and pleasant environment.
My suggestion is for the council to meet with the builder and the developer and
let them know that the Second Edition is not going to happen unless and until the
issues covered in the petitions are solved first. If some issues cannot be
solved, or don't make sense to the council, they could be set aside.
Mr. Hoeft seems to prefer that we all sue one another. This is certainly a way to
make life much more difficult for individuals, and much more profitable for
attorneys. Many of us have had to resort to threats of legal action, letters to
various official bodies, etc. in order to have simple things completed on our
Swift-built homes. This is painful, expensive, and troublesome. It seems to me
that the council can impose its powers to withhold approval instead, and win the
endorsement of your voting citizens. The potential future citizens in the second
addition don't vote yet, as you know.
Bert Casper bertcasper@qwest.net
651-429-7662
6979 Eagle Trail Centerville, MN 55038
7/25/01
Fete des Lacs
Revenue-Expenditures
2001
Sponsorships/Donations
Buttons/Craft Show/Political Reg.
$7,539.00
$465.00
$8,004.00
2001 Expenditures
Miscellaneous
Publications
Advertising/Printing
Professional Services
$4,158.23
$27.00
$773.93
$410.00
$5,369.16
Balance
$2,169.84
2001 FETE DES LACS SPONSORS
~ Amount ~ 1
$250.00
$50.00
$250.00
$250.00
$100.00
$100.00
$1,000.00
$39.00
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
$250.00
$250.00
$350.00
$100.00
$1,500.00
$500.00
$1,000.00
$250.00
$500.00
$100.00
$500.00 In Kind
$100.00
$100.00
$507.44 In Kind
$100.00
$100.00
l Company/Organization/Individual
B & L Designs (Centerville Floral)
Bergman Companies, Inc.
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Assoc.
EXCEL Air Systems
Hugo Feed Mill & Elevator Co.
Resource Strategies Corporation
Richard S. Carlson & Assoc., LLP
Ms. Patricia Scott
Corner Express, Inc.
Magill Properties, Inc.
Star Express Wash, Inc.
Rehbein Excavating, Inc.
Uno Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce
Excel Energy
The Beulke Agency I Inc.
The County Bank
Goetz Landscape & Irrigation
Barna, Guzy & Steffen
Elite Trailers, Inc.
J.M. Bruggeman
Curves for Women
Waldoch sports
Wilke Electric LTD.
Schlavin Family Chiropractic
Mr. & Mrs. Tom Pail
Mr. & Mrs. Tom Peil
John & Sanna Buckbee
Total
$8,546.44
_ $1,007.44 In Kind
$7,539.00
+ $50.00
political Contribution/Parade Registration
Craft Show/Button Revenue
$7,589.00
+ $415.00
$8,004.00
z
o
~
l-
t/)
c;
~
UJ
~
Q.
0
e 0
c:i
:s lO
0 fh
.i
-
$
~
"e
E
8
....
J
c C
::l
0 ~
~
co ....
N Q)
'c Q)
co ~
tn -g
.. en
0 >
l/)
t4
~
l/)
Gl-
-00
...
,s'"
Gl .
u.CD
_CD
O~
-0
c:
Gl
-.:
u.
o
.5
$
::: "c
gill
en~
.30
.c c
iGlIl
c..E
ui~
:ElJ3
0'
o
...
...
CD
....
N
~
...
o
!II
c:
o
C.
II)
~
o
...
!XI
is
on
N
...
CD
CD
....
~
...
o
!II
c:
o
C.
II)
..
Q)
z
en
c
o
ci -
o ~ 0
.... Q .n
9 ~.. (0
III 000 a
.~oU.5.5 e
om c ;.cr; .:C
.5 015 -- .~ ~ c g 0
Ii ;;;: .; 1li ~ &....1 ~
~:1Ei~ 1Ile:(.9 E
0.-0 C.en III Q).l::; III
xQ)oQ)~~~u..
UJQ)....OO'::l-C
.... u.. 0.. .... X Ol UJ .5
GlO;;;:5UJlJ3OlIll
~g'l6'Sl.i9~S{5
uJ::1ilt.en~~en
5
~ ~
1ij~ 5
0015 0
U:~ '0
.9!~ ....
=-0 .80
~c E.5
Se:( III 1Il-
~ ~ E 5.~
OOlOS illiG
-;~.5l1l 0>::-
a,lt. u) ~ ~.( ~
.!~i3~t~
....ISl~UJ-....I.8
allcs~5c.c
coSu:JUJ~:3~
is
~
...
CD
CD
CD
!:!!.
...
o
!
&.
II)
-0
"0
C,!)
o
.!:
au)
~.~
C)1Il
.~ ~
0150
io -
C IIl.Oj
lIlt::c..
IIlE8.>-
-0 &en ;;
ffi g'.c ~
....1....0
llICOOall
~~~ 5
,,-;~~
~
1Il
o
o
ct
...
~
..
0-
III C.
c: ::I
o
C.
II)
E
::I
c:
~
1Il
0:
0..
....I
....I
g
III
III
ce:(
~all
.sa...:
enlllC
-,,"Cll!
""IIlCO
~~ .?:
::l en C
,,_ -e 5
IIlIllU
E{5o>
1Il.- .c
colt.~
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Full
07124101 11 :36 AM
Page 1
Audit 2001
Fund 618
Revenue Total Budget
R 618-36200 Miscellaneous Revenues Budget $0.00 Total Year $415.00
Encumbered $0.00 Balance -$415.00
Debit Credit
Vendor searchName Invoice __.___Check------ Batch Name
3MARCH Comments Refer PO Begin $0.00
32001 Rec 5881 03-13-01 $0.00 $10.00
T. Peterson - Candy 0 0
Total 3MARCH $0.00 $10.00
Ending ($10.00)
Vendor Search Name Invoice _____Check------ Batch Name
6JUNE Comments Refer PO Begin ($10.00)
62001 Ree 6744 6120101 6-20-01 $0.00 $35.00
B & L DESIGNS (CENTERVILLE FL 0 0
62001 Ree 6745 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $35.00
KNOWLEDGE BEGINNINGS - CRA 0 0
62001 Ree 6767 6/27/01 6-27-01 $0.00 $25.00
KELLlE GRUBER - CRAFT SHOW - 0 0
Total 6JUNE $0.00 $95.00
Ending ($105.00)
Vendor Search Name Invoice ______Check----- Batch Name
7 JUL Y Comments Refer PO Begin ($105.00)
72001 Ree 6887 7/5/01 7-5-01 $0.00 $25.00
CRAFT SHOW/BUSINESS EXPO - 0 0
72001 Ree 6893 7/5/017-5-01 $0.00 $25.00
CRAFT SHOW/BUSINESS EXPR (1 0 0
72001 Ree 6891 7/5/017-5-01 $0.00 $50.00
CRAFT SHOW/BUSINESS EXPR - 0 0
72001 Ree 6892 7/5/01 7-5-01 $0.00 $25.00
CRAFT SHOW/BUSINESS EXPR - 0 0
7 2001 Ree 6919 7/16/017-12-01 $0.00 $10.00
2 FETE DES LACS BUTTONS 0 0
72001 Ree 6923 7/16/017-12-01 $0.00 $25.00
GRANT /DONNA PETERS - CRAFT 0 0
7 2001 Ree 6924 7/16/017-12-01 $0.00 $25.00
SAZI DISIGNS - CRAFT SHOW 0 0
7 2001 Ree 6917 7/16/01 7-12-01 $0.00 $5.00
1 FETE DES LACS BUTTON 0 0
7 2001 Ree 6941 7/19/017-19-01 $0.00 $50.00
VANDEVEER VOLUNTEER COMM 0 0
7 2001 Ree 6934 7/19/017-19-01 $0.00 $35.00
CURVES FOR WOMEN CRAFT/BU 0 0
72001 Ree 6936 7/19/017-19-01 $0.00 $5.00
FETE DES LACS BUTTON 0 0
7 2001 Ree 6938 7/19/017-19-01 $0.00 $5.00
FETE DES LACS BUTTON - TOM P 0 0
72001 Ree 6940 7/19/017-19-01 $0.00 $25.00
MARY LOU & TOM WILHARBER - 0 0
Total 7 JULY $0.00 $310.00
Ending ($415.00)
Control Act 618-25300 Unreser
Total Revenue
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Full
Audit 2001
Total R 618-36200 Miscellaneous Revenues
In Balance
Total Year
$415.00
$0.00
Ending
$0.00
07/24/0111:36 AM
Page 2
$415.00
($415.00)
$415.00
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Full
07/24/01 11 :36 AM
Page 1
Audit 2001
Fund 618
Revenue Total Budget
R 618-36230 Contributions and Donations Budget $0.00 Total Year $7,339.00
Encumbered $0.00 Balance -$7,339.00
Debit Credit
Vendor Search Name Invoice .-.-..Check....-. Batch Name
4APRIL Comments Refer PO Begin $0.00
42001 Rec 5931 4/4/01 4-07-01 $0.00 $39.00
FETE DES LAC DONATION- P. SC 0 0
Total 4APRIL $0.00 $39.00
Ending ($39.00)
Vendor Search Name Invoice ..--..Check.-.--. Batch Name
6JUNE Comments Refer PO Begin ($39.00)
62001 Rec 6751 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $100.00
CORNER EXPRESS - FETE DES L 0 0
62001 Rec 6719 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $1,000.00
RICHARD S. CARLSON & ASSOC. 0 0
62001 Rec 6720 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $100.00
RESOURCE STRATEGIES CORP- 0 0
62001 Rec 6721 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $100.00
HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR C 0 0
62001 Rec 6736 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $250.00
B & L DESIGNS (CENTERVILLE FL 0 0
62001 Rec 6737 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $250.00
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLI 0 0
62001 Rec 6738 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $250.00
EXCEL AIR SYSTEMS - FETE DES 0 0
62001 Rec 6739 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $50.00
BERGMAN COMPANIES, INC. - FE 0 0
62001 Rec 6749 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $100.00
STAR EXPRESS WASH INC. - FET 0 0
62001 Rec 6750 6/20/01 6-20-01 $0.00 $100.00
MAGILL PROPERTIES, INC. FETE 0 0
62001 Rec 6769 6/27/016-27-01 $0.00 $250.00
L1NO LAKES AREA CHAMBER OF 0 0
62001 Rec 6764 6/27/016-27-01 $0.00 $250.00
REHBINE EXCAVATING INC. - FET 0 0
Total 6JUNE $0.00 $2,800.00
Ending ($2,839.00)
Vendor Search Name Invoice _.-...Check..-..' Batch Name
7JULY Comments Refer PO Begin ($2,839.00)
72001 Rec 6776 7/3/017-3-01 $0.00 $350.00
FETE DES LACS DONATION - XC 0 0
72001 Rec 6894 7/5/017-5-01 $0.00 $100.00
THE BEULKE AGENCY, INC - FET 0 0
72001 Rec 6895 7/5/017-5-01 $0.00 $1,500.00
THE COUNTY BANK - FETE DES L 0 0
72001 Rec 6912 7/16/017-12-01 $0.00 $1,000.00
BARNA, GUZV & STEFFEN, FETE 0 0
72001 Rec 6929 7/16/017-12-01 $0.00 $500.00
GOETZ LANDSCAPING FETE DE 0 0
''7''"",,l'", ';2aii;"
7 2001 Rec
72001 Rec
72001 Rec
72001 Rec
Control Act 618-25300 Unreser
Total Revenue
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Full
Audit 2001
6947
JOHN & SANNA BUCKBEE - FETE
6932
J.M. BRUGGEMAN COMPANIES &
6933
CURVES FOR WOMEN - FETE DE
6939
WILKE ELECTRIC, L TO - FETE DE
Total 7JULY
7/19/017-19-01
o 0
7/19/017-19-01
o 0
7/19/017-19-01
o 0
7/19/017-19-01
o 0
Total R 618-36230 Contributions and
Donations
In Balance
Total Year
$7,339.00
07/24/01 11 :36 AM
Page 2
$0.00 $100.00
$0.00 $750.00
$0.00 $100.00
$0.00 $100.00
$0.00 $4,500.00
Ending ($7,339.00)
$0.00 $7,339.00
Ending ($7,339.00)
$0.00 $7,339.00
Fund 618
Expenditure
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Full
Audit 2001
Total Budget
E 618-49000-300 Professional Srvs
Budget
Encumbered
$0.00 Total Year
$0.00 Balance
7JULY
72001 Pay
Control Act 618-25300 Unreser
Total
Expenditure
Vendor Search Name
Comments
Invoice ......Check...... Batch Name
Refer PO
015921 6/28/01 070301
o 0
DOWN ON THE FAR
1/2 PYMT FOR PETTING ZOON
Debit
Begin
$410.00
Total 7JULY
Total E 618-49000-300 Professional Srvs
In Balance
Total Year
$410.00
$410.00
$410.00
Ending
$410.00
Ending
07/24/01 11 :37 AM
Page 1
$410.00
-$410.00
Credit
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$410.00
$0.00
$410.00
$0.00
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Full
Audit 2001
Fund 618
Expenditure
Total Budget
E 618-49000-340 Advertising & Printing
Budget
Encumbered
$0.00 Total Year
$0.00 Balance
Vendor Search Name Invoice ------Check----- Batch Name
4APRIl Comments Refer PO
42001 Pay PRESS PUBLICA TIO 015639 4/11/0104-04-01
FESTIVAL ADS 0 0
Total 4APRIl
Vendor Search Name Invoice -----Check------ Batch Name
6JUNE Comments Refer PO
62001 Pay THill, JOHN 015815 5/31/01 060701
REIMBURSEMENT FOR FETE DE 0 0
62001 Pay DEVINE, RAY 015872 6/12/01 062501
REIMBUSEMENT FOR FETE DES 0 0
Total 6JUNE
Vendor Search Name Invoice ----check------ Batch Name
7 JULY Comments Refer PO
72001 Pay DEVINE, RAY 015922 6/28/01 070301
ADVERTISING EXP - BUTTONS F 0 0
72001 Pay FOREST lAKE PRIN 015926 7/2/01 070301
FLYERS FOR FETE DES LACS 0 0
Total 7JUlY
Control Act 618-25300 Unreser
Total E 618-49000-340 Advertising & Printing
In Balance Total Year $773.93
Total
Expenditure
Debit
Begin
$399.60
$399.60
Ending
Begin
$46.31
$58.56
$104.87
Ending
Begin
$100.12
$169.34
$269.46
Ending
$773.93
Ending
$773.93
07/24/01 11 :37 AM
Page 1
$773.93
-$773.93
Credit
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$399.60
$399.60
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$504.47
$504.47
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$773.93
$0.00
$773.93
$0.00
Fund 618
Expenditure
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Full
E 618-49000-350 Ord., Pub. Hearings, etc.
2FEBRUARY
22001 Pay
Control Act 618-25300 Unreser
Total
Expenditure
Vendor Search Name
Comments
PRESS PUBLlCATIO
Meeting Re-Scheduling
In Balance
Audit 2001
Total Budget
Budget
Encumbered
$0.00 Total Year
$0.00 Balance
Invoice ......Check....-- Batch Name
Refer PO
2092030015516 2/28/01 02-23-01
o 0
Debit
Begin
$27.00
Total 2FEBRUARY
Total E 618-49000-350 Ord., Pub. Hearings,
etc.
Total Year
$27.00
$27.00
$27.00
Ending
$27.00
Ending
07/24/01 11 :37 AM
Page 1
$27.00
-$27.00
Credit
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$27.00
$0.00
$27.00
$0.00
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Full
07/24/01 11 :37 AM
Page 1
Audit 2001
Fund 618
Expenditure Total Budget
E 618-49000-430 Miscellaneous Budget $0.00 Total Year $4,158.23
Encumbered $0.00 Balance -$4,158.23
Debit Credit
Vendor SearchName Invoice ______Check------ Batch Name
2FEBRUARY Comments Refer PO Begin $0.00
22001 Pay JIMMY ALLEN EVEN FESTIVAL 015444 2/9/01 02-09-01 $600.00 $0.00
BROKER'S FEES 0 0
Total 2FEBRUARY $600.00 $0.00
Ending $600.00
Vendor Search Name Invoice _-_---Check------ Batch Name
3MARCH Comments Refer PO Begin $600.00
32001 Pay OFFICE MAX 015558 3/14/01 3-08-01 $28.74 $0.00
Addr. Labels 0 0
32001 Pay SWEENEY, KRIS 015564 3/14/01 3-08-01 $1.29 $0.00
MILEAGE -FETE DES LAC PACKE 0 0
32001 Pay U.S. POSTAL SERVI 015567 3/14/01 3-08-01 $74.74 $0.00
POSTAGE - FETE DES LAC 0 0
Total 3MARCH $104.77 $0.00
Ending $704.77
Vendor Search Name Invoice ------Check---- Batch Name
4APRIL Comments Refer PO Begin $704.77
42001 Pay DEVINE, KARLA 015667 4/25/01 042501 $20.00 $0.00
FETE DES LACS MEETINGS 2-21 0 0
4 2001 Pay DEVINE, RAY 015668 4/25/01 042501 $30.00 $0.00
FETE DES LACS MEETINGS 1-29, 0 0
42001 Pay PEIL, KATHY 015689 4/25/01 042501 $30.00 $0.00
FETE DES LACS 1-29,2-21, & 3-1 0 0
42001 Pay REHBINE, MARYAN 015696 4/25/01 042501 $10.00 $0.00
FETE DES LACS 1-29-01 0 0
42001 Pay SCOTT, PATRICIA 015698 4/25/01 042501 $10.00 $0.00
FETE DES LACS - 3-19-01 0 0
42001 Pay SWEENEY, TERRY 015701 4/25/01 042501 $30.00 $0.00
FETE DES LACS 1-29,2-21 & 3-19 0 0
42001 Pay THILL, JOHN 015702 4/25/01 042501 $10.00 $0.00
FETE DES LACS 1-29-01 0 0
42001 Pay TRAVIS, MONICA 015705 4/25/01 042501 $10.00 $0.00
FETE DES LACS 2-21-01 0 0
Total 4APRIL $150.00 $0.00
Ending $854.77
Vendor SearchName Invoice --.---Check----- Batch Name
5MAY Comments Refer PO Begin $854.77
52001 Pay HERR FAMILY AMU 015719 4/30/01050301 $1,500.00 $0.00
DEPOSIT ON CARNIVAL 0 0
Total 5MAY $1,500.00 $0.00
Ending $2,354.77
Vendor SearchName Invoice ______Check------ Batch Name
6JUNE Comments Refer PO Begin $2,354.77
62001 Pay THILL, JOHN 015815 5/31/01060701 $32.35 $0.00
REIMBUSEMENT FOR FETE DES 0 0
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Full
07/24/01 11 :38 AM
Page 2
''7",u.at~~':LaJ,.." Audit 2001
6 2001 Pay THILL, JOHN 015815 5/31101060701 $141.96 $0,00
REIMBUSEMENT FOR FETE DES 0 0
62001 Pay PRECISION FIRE SP 015816 5/31/01060701 $78.81 $0.00
REIMBURSE FOR COPIES FOR F 0 0
62001 Pay DEVINE. KARLA 015891 6/27/01062501 $18.15 $0.00
POST AGE - FETE DES LACS CEL 0 0
62001 Pay NEIL ENTERPRISES, 21061548015909 6/27/01062501 $274.46 $0.00
3" SNAPIN BUTTONS - FETE DES 0 0
Total 6JUNE $545.73 $0.00
Ending $2,900.50
Vendor SearchName Invoice ..____Check---. Batch Name
7 JULY Comments Refer PO Begin $2,900.50
72001 Pay PRECISION FIRE SP 015923 6/28/01 070301 $51.41 $0.00
COPIES FOR FETE DES LACS & S 0 0
72001 Pay DEVINE, KARLA 015935 7/11/01070301 $60.00 $0.00
APRIL, MAY, & JUNE FETE DES L 0 0
7 2001 Pay DEVINE. RAY 015936 7/11/01 070301 $60.00 $0,00
APRIL, MAY, JUNE - FETE DES LA 0 0 I
72001 Pay KIESELHORST, LISA 015945 7/11/01070301 $20.00 $0.00
JUNE - FETE DES LACS 0 0 I
72001 Pay PEIL, KATHY 015956 7/11/01070301 $60.00 $0.00
APRIL, MAY & JUNE FETE DES L 0 0
72001 Pay SCOTT, PATRICIA 015960 7/11/01070301 $40.00 $0.00 I
MAY & JUNE FETE DES LACS 0 0
72001 Pay SWEENEY, TERRY 015966 7/11/01 070301 $40.00 $0.00 I
4-16-01 & 5-21-01 FETE DES LACS 0 0
72001 Pay THILL, JOHN 015967 7/11/01 070301 $40.00 $0.00
MAY & JUNE FETE DES LACS ME 0 0 I
72001 Pay TOWN CRIER PROM 016017 7/25/017-19-01 $886.32 $0,00
FETE DES LACS 0 0
Total 7 JULY $1,257.73 $0.00
Ending $4,158.23
Control Act 618-25300 Unreser Total E 618-49000-430 MiscellaneouS $4,158.23 $0.00
In Balance Total Year $4,158.23 Ending $4,158.23
Total Expenditure $4,158.23 $0.00
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Revenue/Expenditure
Audit Detail Full
Audit 2001
Fund 618
$4,158.23
07/24/01 11 :38 AM
Page 3
$0.00
.
I
NOT
APPROVED
PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
July 10,2001
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Parks and Recreation Committee of the City
ofCenterville held their regularly scheduled meeting on July 10,2001, at City Hall, 1880
Main Street. Chairperson Doug Porter called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.rn.
Present:
Chairperson Doug Porter
Karla DeVine
Tom Lee
Brian Walter
Kathy Peil
Absent:
Wayne LeBlanc
Tedd Peterson
Staff:
Jill Lien
APPEARANCES
Mr. Chaymus KIang (7162lVlill Road) and Mason Wurscher (7132 Gray Heron Drive)
appeared before the Parks and Recreation Committee to request permission to have
several bands play for four to six hours at one of the parks in town. Mr. Klang explained
that several youth have started bands, and they have no place to play. They are looking
for this to be a half-day event, where potentially hundreds of kids will come to listen to
their music. The style of music is somewhat comparable to what you would hear on 93X,
which is hard rock/metal. Mr. Wurscher commented that he works for A to Z RentaL and
he can get a stage, tent, lights, cables etc. for free. Their concerns were ifthere was a
need for any type of permits required, security issues, or any other concerns the Parks and
Recreation Committee may have. They were hoping to have this event sometime in mid
to late August, during the daytime hours.
After discussion the Committee expressed concerns over the following issues, and
requested Ms. Lien follow-up on the same:
1. Noise Permit
2. Police Department
3. Fire Department
4. Satellites
5. Clean-up
6. Liabilities - League ofMN Cities - Special Event Coverage
1
.
,
7. Parking
8. City Council Approval/Conditions
The Committee questioned Mr. Klang specifically ifhis own band would be willing to
play at the Grand Opening of the Wheels Park, if the whole six (6)-band option wouldn't
work. Mr. Klang commented that he would be happy to play at anytime. The Committee
thanked Mr. Klang and Mr. Wurscher for appearing before the Committee, and informed
them that Ms. Lien would get back to them after additional research had been done.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
June 6. 2001 Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes
Motion by Mr. Lee, seconded by Ms. DeVine to approve the June 6, 2001 Parks and
Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Trail Map Brochures
Ms. DeVine explained that per her conversation with Mr. LeBlanc who had attended the
EDe meeting to see if they would be interested in sharing the fees and planning of the
brochure, that the EDC would like to see a more condensed version than what Mr.
LeBlanc had presented. They would like to see a one page brochure - tri-folded, as
presented by Ms. DeVine. Mr. Terway was going to bring a copy of Vadnais Heights'
trail map to Ms. De Vine, but she hasn't heard back from him as of yet. The Committee
elected to table this item at this time until Mr. LeBlanc could give his update.
Satellite Enclosures
Mr. Walter explained that he received a quote from Goetz Landscape for planting natural
barriers (bushes) around all of the satellites at the parks. The quote came in at
approximately $2,500, which includes installation. Mr. Walter explained that it would
take time for the natural barriers to grow and become established, but eventually
maintenance of these bushes will become an issue. Who will be responsible for trimming
and upkeep of these bushes at the parks? Mr. Walter questioned the use of the satellites
at Royal Meadows and Eagle Parks. Specifically, is there really a need for satellites at
these two (2) parks? After discussion, the Committee concurred that there is a need for
satellites at these two (2) parks. Additionally, if the Committee elected to remove the
satellites at the two (2) parks, then it would become an issue at the other parks that still
have them. The Committee decided to look at wood fencing on two (2) sides of each
satellite instead of natural barriers. This would be considerably less expensive. Mr.
Walter will check into pretreated, pre-made fence sections and report back at the next
meeting.
Ag-Lime and Fence Relocation at Laurie LaMotte Park
Ms. Lien explained that with the relocation of the fencing and backstops at LaMotte Park,
that additional ag-lime would be required. Mr. Peterson has left messages with the Little
2
-
I
League several times, but they haven't called back. He was hoping they would be willing
to donate ag-Iime as they have in the past, but he is having a difficult time just getting
through to them. Mr. Peterson had received a quote for 25 tons of ag-lime at a cost of
$432. Ms. Lien questioned Mr. March as to if this could come out ofthe maintenance
expenses. Mr. March approved this expense from the maintenance budget. Ms. Lien
commented that ultimately, this needs to be done by the end of July for the Fete des Lacs
Tournament.
Mr. Peterson received a quote from Modem Fence for the relocation of the backstops,
which came in $1,500 higher than what had been expected. Council already approved
$3,500. After discussion, the following motion was made:
Motion by Mr. Porter, seconded by Ms. DeVine to request approval of an additional
$1,500 for installation costs for the relocation of the fencing at Laurie LaMotte
Park, due to the unavailability olthe Public Works Department to perform the
labor as originally recommended to City Council (total project cost of $5,000). All
in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Ms. DeVine requested Modem Fencing sign a performance agreement for work to be
completed by July 30th.
Wheels Park
a Follow-up on Wheels Park Meeting
b. Voting Tabulations
c. Proposed expenses
d. Rules and Regulations / Signage
e. Advisory Board
f. Grand Opening
g. Article in Quad
Ms. Lien explained there were 32 youth signed in for the Wheels Park Meeting. Included
in the packet was the voting form with the final tabulations - most popular being circled.
The fun box was the most popular piece with 18 votes. Ms. Lien explained she was
requested to submit the proposed expenditures for the Wheels Park and the current
expenses to date, to City Council. Included were copies ofthe "Parks and Recreations
Proposed Expenditures for the Year 2001, and an updated "Park Fund" balance sheet.
Ms. Lien commented that interest had been added for the year 2000 on the balance sheet.
Additionally, staff is still researching the $7k overage from the year 2000, and whether it
needs to be expended from the 2001 Park Dedication Fees, or from the General Fund.
Per direction from Mr. March, the $7k overage was removed. Ms. Lien shared that the
total cost for the Laurie LaMotte Park Improvements is $181,180 - which does not
include shippinglhandling for the Wheels Park equipment. A breakdown of the proposed
Wheels Park equipment is as follows:
3
SkateWave
Fun Box
Mini Half Pipe
Spine (12')
Quarter Pipe
Tax (6.5%)
Total
..
\
SunRamp Solutions
Breaker
Spine
Quarter Pipe (12')
$ 6,840
$11 ,240
$ 6,270
$ 5.260
$30,600
$30,600
+ 8.385
$38,985
+ 2.534
$41,519 (Plus shipping/handling)
$2,195
$2,695
$3.495
$8,385
Ms. Lien explained she took the top four (4) choices from SkateWave, and the top three
(3) choices from SunRamp Solutions. Outside ofthe fact that these are the items the
youth picked, she recommended the "Spine" and the "Quarter Pipe" from both vendors.
She felt SunRamp Solutions would be better equipment for bicycles, while at the same
time, SkateWave would provide better equipment that is more suitable for skate-boards
and in-lines. This would allow both bikes and skateboards/in-lines to use equipment at
the same time. Ms. Lien commented that the equipment from SkateWave didn't appear
to be the most suitable for bicycles.
Motion by Ms. Peil, seconded by Mr. Walter to request $42,000 from City Council
to purchase equipment for the Wheels Park at Laurie LaMotte Park. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimously.
Ms. Lien explained she had compiled a draft "Rules and Regulations" and requested the
Committee Members to review, comment, change or add to anything they felt necessary.
Ms. Lien commented that it was her understanding that the Advisory Board should only
be OBSERVING what is happening at the Wheels Park, and calling the appropriate
parties (police) when necessary. They are to be the "eyes and ears" of the park. She
explained that the Committee shouldn't place any member ofthe Advisory Board in
uncomfortable positions (i.e.: friends, enemies, siblings, etc.). There are six (6) youth
interested in being on the Advisory Board.
Ms. Lien explained that Mr. Peterson had been in contact with someone from the League
of.MN Cities and Tom Gross with Berkley Risk Administrators Company (brae)
regarding proper signage. Mr. Gross made several suggestions, including constructing
with 4" letters similar to highway signs. The letters should be reflective and have a
contrasting color to the background. He also recommended that the City Attorney andlor
the League ofMN Cities review the signage before installation. Ms. Lien offered to
contact Brian with Gator Signs to see ifhe could make the sign, and how much it would
cost to do so.
The final "Rules and Regulations" are as follows:
4
.I
1. Protective gear is strongly encouraged.
2. No drugs or alcohol.
3. No smoking or chewing tobacco.
4. No fighting.
5. No loitering.
6. No reckless behavior.
7. No profanity.
8. No stickers on park property/equipment.
9. No graffiti.
10. Not responsible for lost or stolen articles.
11. Only bikes, skateboards, roller-blades and in-line skates allowed.
12. Be responsible - maintain the park by cleaning up trash.
13. Be respectful of others and the park property.
14. RIDE/SKATE AT YOUR OWN RISK.
Anyone using the Wheels Park is asked to contact the Police if they
witness any inappropriate behavior.
THIS IS YOUR PARK, PLEASE TAKE CARE OF IT
FOR YOUR SAFETY (will be placed at the top of the sign).
The Committee discussed possible dates for a Grand Opening for the Wheels Park, and
elected to tentatively set the date for Saturday, August 11, 2001 at 1 :00 p.m., subject to
delivery of the equipment from the vendors. Since the Committee was unsure of whether
the Council would approve the request for $42k for park equipment or not, they couldn't
direct Ms. Lien to order the equipment until after the Council Meeting on July 11,2001.
At that, the Committee elected to hold a Special Meeting to pick out the equipment and
finalize any other issues related specifically to the Wheels Park on Monday, July 16th at
6:00 p.rn. Ms. Lien will contact the vendors after Council's approval/denial to find out
their delivery time for the equipment. If at that time, it is determined that the vendors
cannot provide the equipment before August 11 th, the tentative date for the Grand
Opening would be changed to Saturday, August 18,2001.
Ms. Lien explained she had included the article published in the Quad for informationai
purposes only. She noted some errors in the article, but overall it was a pretty good
article.
Budget
Tabled
NEW BUSINESS
Borowicz Request for Bon-fire at Acorn Creek Park
Ms. Lien distnbuted a letter received from Becki Borowicz (1861 Revoir St.) requesting
permission from the Parks and Recreation Committee to have a bon-fire in Acorn Creek
Park, for their annual block party on August 25th. Ms. Borowicz already obtained
5
'.
approval from Milo Bennett (Fire Chief). Mr. Bennett informed her that she needed to
obtain approval from the Parks and Recreation Committee.
After discussion, the following motion was made:
Motion by Mr. Porter, seconded by Mr. Lee to recommend to City Council denial of
the Borowicz's request to use Acorn Creek Park for a block party bon-fire. Porter,
Lee, Walter, Peil- yea. DeVine ~ abstain. Motion carried.
Ms. Lien will contact the Borowicz's.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
Monthly Financial Statement
Discussed previously.
Wargo Activities Update
Ms. Lien explained that there have been 90 - 100 kids at each program, with the
exception of the Canoeing/Kayaking, which has a limit of20. There wasn't a program on
July 3rd due to the Independence Holiday.
Set Agenda
1. Satellite Enclosures
2. Band Request
3. Budget
4. Wheels Park
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Mr. Walter, seconded by Mr. Porter to adjourn the July 10,2001 Parks
and Recreation Committee Meeting. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.rn.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jill Lien
Staff Liaison
6
....~.~.
j'\ l\ lIt )i;,
'; L.) fl~L
~] ~tl]
',' '
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Teresa Bender, Clerk/Treasurer
SUBJECT: Liquor Policy
DATE: July 25,2001
Subsequent to speaking with Mr. Bisek, Mr. DeFoe and Mr. Sager this afternoon, Mr.
Montain was unable to reach him directly, left message at Trio. Mr. March discussed this
issue with Mr. Bisek and Mr. Montain prior to his departure. All of the above stated
individuals felt that additional time needed to be taken in consideration of a policy and
felt that a work session with Council to discuss this issue would be the proper method of
discussing same.
All of the above felt that they would benefit from meeting with neighboring
communities' business owners and the local law enforcement agencies on a regular basis
as previously organized several years ago.
If Council desires to proceed with this policy, Council needs to arrange a work session to
devote the needed time to consider same.
~
)
'+$"':'i
4.'
. '
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Teresa Bender, Clerk/Treasurer
SUBJECT: 2002 Budget
DATE: July 25, 2001
Attached, please find Minnesota Statue 275.065, Proposed property taxes, notice.
Subdivision 1 refers to the requirements of the City in having to adopt a proposed budget,
by resolution, prior to September 15,2001 for the year 2002.
Mr. Palzer and I have discussed this matter and desire to draft a preliminary budget for
Council consideration at a work session to be scheduled by Council in early August.
Staff will be contacting all Committees/Commission to ascertain their budgets prior to
same.
Council needs to schedule a work session to discuss the preliminary budget.
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
Page 1 of 14
(
Minnesota Statutes 2000, Table of Chapters
Table of contents for Chapter 275
275.065 Proposed property taxes; notice.
Subdivision 1. Proposed levy. (a) Notwithstanding
any law or charter to the contrary, on or before September 15,
each taxing authority, other than a school district, shall adopt
a proposed budget and shall certify to the county auditor the
proposed or, in the case of a town, the final property tax levy
for taxes payable in the following year.
(b) On or before September 30, each school district shall
certify to the county auditor the proposed property tax levy for
taxes payable in the following year. The school district shall
certify the proposed levy as:
(1) the state determined school levy amount as prescribed
under section 126C.13, subdivision 2;
(2) voter approved referendum and debt levies; and
(3) the sum of the remaining school levies, or the maximum
levy limitation certified by the commissioner of children,
families, and learning according to section 126C.48, subdivision
I, less the amounts levied under clauses (1) and (2).
(c) If the board of estimate and taxation or any similar
board that establishes maximum tax levies for taxing
jurisdictions within a first class city certifies the maximum
property tax levies for funds under its jurisdiction by charter
to the county auditor by September IS, the city shall be deemed
to have certified its levies for those taxing jurisdictions.
(d) For purposes of this section, "taxing authority"
includes all home rule and statutory cities, towns, counties,
school districts, and special taxing districts as defined in
section 275.066. Intermediate school districts that levy a tax
under chapter 124 or 136D, joint powers boards established under
sections 123A.44 to 123A.446, and common school districts No.
323, Franconia, and No. 815, Prinsburg, are also special taxing
districts for purposes of this section.
Subd. la. Overlapping jurisdictions. In the case of
a taxing authority lying in two or more counties, the home
county auditor shall certify the proposed levy and the proposed
local tax rate to the other county auditor by September 20. The
home county auditor must estimate the levy or rate in preparing
the notices required in subdivision 3, if the other county has
not certified the appropriate information. If requested by the
home county auditor, the other county auditor must furnish an
estimate to the home county auditor.
Subd. lb. Repealed, 1992 c 511 art 3 s 9
Subd. Ie.
Levy; shared, merged, consolidated services.
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/27 5/065 .html
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
If two or more taxing authorities are in the process of
negotiating an agreement for sharing, merging, or consolidating
services between those taxing authorities at the time the
proposed levy is to be certified under subdivision 1, each
taxing authority involved in the negotiation shall certify its
total proposed levy as provided in that subdivision, including a
notification to the county auditor of the specific service
involved in the agreement which is not yet finalized. The
affected taxing authorities may amend their proposed levies
under subdivision 1 until October 10 for levy amounts relating
only to the specific service involved.
Subd. 2. Repealed, lSp1989 c 1 art 9 s 85
Subd. 3. Notice of proposed property taxes. (a) The
county auditor shall prepare and the county treasurer shall
deliver after November 10 and on or before November 24 each
year, by first class mail to each taxpayer at the address listed
on the county's current year's assessment roll, a notice of
proposed property taxes.
(b) The commissioner of revenue shall prescribe the form of
the notice.
(c) The notice must inform taxpayers that it contains the
amount of property taxes each taxing authority proposes to
collect for taxes payable the following year. In the case of a
town, or in the case of the state determined portion of the
school district levy, the final tax amount will be its proposed
tax. The notice must clearly state that each taxing authority,
including regional library districts established under section
134.201, and including the metropolitan taxing districts as
defined in paragraph (i), but excluding all other special taxing
districts and towns, will hold a public meeting to receive
public testimony on the proposed budget and proposed or final
property tax levy, or, in case of a school district, on the
current budget and proposed property tax levy. It must clearly
state the time and place of each taxing authority's meeting and
an address where comments will be received by mail.
(d) The notice must state for each parcel:
(1) the market value of the property as determined under
section 273.11, and used for computing property taxes payable in
the following year and for taxes payable in the current year as
each appears in the records of the county assessor on November 1
of the current year; and, in the case of residential property,
whether the property is classified as homestead or
nonhomestead. The notice must clearly inform taxpayers of the
years to which the market values apply and that the values are
final values;
(2) the items listed below, shown separately by county,
city or town, state determined school tax net of the education
homestead credit under section 273.1382, voter approved school
levy, other local school levy, and the sum of the special taxing
districts, and as a total of all taxing authorities:
(i) the actual tax for taxes payable in the current year;
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/27 5/065 .html
Page 2 of 14
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
Page 3 of 14
(ii) the tax change due to spending factors, defined as the
proposed tax minus the constant spending tax amountj
(iii) the tax change due to other factors, defined as the
constant spending tax amount minus the actual current year taxj
and
(iv) the proposed tax amount.
In the case of a town or the state determined school tax,
the final tax shall also be its proposed tax unless the town
changes its levy at a special town meeting under section
365.52. If a school district has certified under section
126C.17, subdivision 9, that a referendum will be held in the
school district at the November general election, the county
auditor must note next to the school district's proposed amount
that a referendum is pending and that, if approved by the
voters, the tax amount may be higher than shown on the notice.
In the case of the city of Minneapolis, the levy for the
Minneapolis library board and the levy for Minneapolis park and
recreation shall be listed separately from the remaining amount
of the city's levy. In the case of a parcel where tax increment
or the fiscal disparities areawide tax under chapter 276A or
473F applies, the proposed tax levy on the captured value or the
proposed tax levy on the tax capacity subject to the areawide
tax must each be stated separately and not included in the sum
of the special taxing districtsj and
(3) the increase or decrease between the total taxes
payable in the current year and the total proposed taxes,
expressed as a percentage.
For purposes of this section, the amount of the tax on
homesteads qualifying under the senior citizens' property tax
deferral program under chapter 290B is the total amount of
property tax before subtraction of the deferred property tax
amount.
(e) The notice must clearly state that the proposed or
final taxes do not include the following:
(1) special assessmentsj
(2) levies approved by the voters after the date the
proposed taxes are certified, including bond referenda, school
district levy referenda, and levy limit increase referendaj
(3) amounts necessary to pay cleanup or other costs due to
a natural disaster occurring after the date the proposed taxes
are certifiedj
(4) amounts necessary to pay tort judgments against the
taxing authority that become final after the date the proposed
taxes are certifiedj and
(5) the contamination tax imposed on properties which
received market value reductions for contamination.
(f) Except as provided in subdivision 7, failure of the
county auditor to prepare or the county treasurer to deliver the
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/27 5/065 .html
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
Page 4 of 14
notice as required in this section does not invalidate the
proposed or final tax levy or the taxes payable pursuant to the
tax levy.
(g) If the notice the taxpayer receives under this section
lists the property as nonhomestead, and satisfactory
documentation is provided to the county assessor by the
applicable deadline, and the property qualifies for the
_homestead classification in that assessment year, the assessor
shall reclassify the property to homestead for taxes payable in
the following year.
(h) In the case of class 4 residential property used as a
residence for lease or rental periods of 30 days or more, the
taxpayer must either:
(1) mail or deliver a copy of the notice of proposed
property taxes to each tenant, renter, or lessee; or
(2) post a copy of the notice in a conspicuous place on the
premises of the property.
The notice must be mailed or posted by the taxpayer by
November 27 or within three days of receipt of the notice,
whichever is later. A taxpayer may notify the county treasurer
of the address of the taxpayer, agent, caretaker, or manager of
the premises to which the notice must be mailed in order to
fulfill the requirements of this paragraph.
(i) For purposes of this subdivision, subdivisions 5a and
6, "metropolitan special taxing districts" means the following
taxing districts in the seven-county metropolitan area that levy
a property tax for any of the specified purposes listed below:
(1) metropolitan council under section 473.132, 473.167,
473.249, 473.325, 473.446, 473.521, 473.547, or 473.834;
(2) metropolitan airports commission under section 473.667,
473.671, or 473.672; and
(3) metropolitan mosquito control commission under section
Ll7~~11.
For purposes of this section, any levies made by the
regional rail authorities in the county of Anoka, Carver,
Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, or Washington under chapter
398A shall be included with the appropriate county's levy and
shall be discussed at that county's public hearing.
(j) If a statutory or home rule charter city or a town has
exercised the local levy option provided by section 473.388,
subdivision 7, it may include in the notice of its proposed
taxes the amount of its proposed taxes attributable to its
exercise of the option. In the first year of the city or town's
exercise of this option, the statement shall include an estimate
of the reduction of the metropolitan council's tax on the parcel
due to exercise of that option. The metropolitan council's levy
shall be adjusted accordingly.
Subd. 3a.
Constant spending levy amount.
(a) For
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/2 7 5/065 .html
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
purposes of this section, "constant spending levy amount" for a
county, city, town, or special taxing district means the
property tax levy that the taxing authority would need to levy
so that the sum of (i) its levy, including its fiscal
disparities distribution levy under section 276A.06, subdivision
3, clause (a), or 473F.08, subdivision 3, clause (a), plus (ii)
its property tax aid amounts, would remain constant from the
current year to the proposed year, taking into account the
~fiscal disparities distribution levy amounts and the property
tax aid amounts that have been certified for the proposed year.
For the purposes of this paragraph, property tax aids include
homestead and agricultural credit aid under section 273.1398,
subdivision 2, local government aid under section 477A.013,
county criminal justice aid under section 477A.0121, and family
preservation aid under section 477A.0122.
(b) For the state determined school tax, "constant spending
levy amount" is the same as the proposed tax.
(c) For the voter approved school levy, "constant spending
levy amount" is the result of the following computation: (i)
compute the current year's revenue per pupil in average daily
membership as the ratio of the voter approved referendum and
debt service levy plus aid revenue to the number of pupils in
average daily membership, as estimated at the time of levy
certification the previous December; (ii) compute the proposed
year's levy ratio as ratio of the proposed year's levy
limitation for voter approved referendum and debt service
revenue to the maximum referendum and debt service levy plus aid
revenue for the proposed year, at the time of proposed levy
certification in September; and (iii) compute the "constant
spending levy amount" as the product of the current year's
revenue per pupil from clause (i) times the proposed year's levy
ratio from clause (ii) times the proposed year's pupils in
average daily membership.
(d) For the sum of all other school levies not included in
paragraph (b) or (c), "constant spending levy amount" is the
result of the following computation: (i) compute the current
year's revenue per pupil in average daily membership as the
ratio of the levy plus associated aid revenue to the number of
pupils in average daily membership, as estimated at the time of
levy certification the previous December; (ii) compute the
proposed year's levy ratio as ratio of the proposed year's levy
limitation to the maximum levy plus associated aid revenue for
the proposed year, estimated at the time of proposed levy
certification in September; and (iii) compute the "constant
spending levy amount" as the product of the current year's
revenue per pupil from clause (i) times the proposed year's levy
ratio from clause (ii) times the proposed year's pupils in
average daily membership.
(e) Each year, the commissioner of children, families, and
learning must compute and report to the county auditor each
school district's constant spending levy amounts by September
30. In no case shall a constant spending levy amount be less
than $0. For the purposes of this subdivision, school homestead
and agricultural credit aid under section 273.1398, subdivision
2, shall be included in the other school levy category. For
purposes of this subdivision, the school fiscal disparities
http://www.revisor.leg.state.Inn.us/stats/2 7 5/065 .html
Page 5 of 14
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
distribution levy shall be apportioned proportionately among
levy categories.
(f) For the tax increment financing tax, and the fiscal
disparities tax, the "constant spending levy amount" is the same
as the proposed tax.
Subd. 4. Costs. If the reasonable cost of the county
auditor's services and the cost of preparing and mailing the
notice required in this section exceed the amount distributed to
the county by the commissioner of revenue to administer this
section, the taxing authority must reimburse the county for the
excess cost. The excess cost must be apportioned between taxing
jurisdictions as follows:
(1) one-third is allocated to the county;
(2) one-third is allocated to cities and towns within the
county; and
(3) one-third is allocated to school districts within the
county.
The amounts in clause (2) must be further apportioned among
the cities and towns in the proportion that the number of
parcels in the city and town bears to the number of parcels in
all the cities and towns within the county. The amount in
clause (3) must be further apportioned among the school
districts in the proportion that the number of parcels in the
school district bears to the number of parcels in all school
districts within the county.
Subd. 5. Repealed, 1Sp1989 c 1 art 9 s 85
Subd. 5a. Public advertisement. (a) A city that has
a population of more than 2,500, county, a metropolitan special
taxing district as defined in subdivision 3, paragraph (i), a
regional library district established under section 134.201, or
school district shall advertise in a newspaper a notice of its
intent to adopt a budget and property tax levy or, in the case
of a school district, to review its current budget and proposed
property taxes payable in the following year, at a public
hearing. The notice must be published not less than two
business days nor more than six business days before the hearing.
The advertisement must be at least one-eighth page in size
of a standard-size or a tabloid-size newspaper. The
advertisement must not be placed in the part of the newspaper
where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. The
advertisement must be published in an official newspaper of
general circulation in the taxing authority. The newspaper
selected must be one of general interest and readership in the
community, and not one of limited subject matter. The
advertisement must appear in a newspaper that is published at
least once per week.
For purposes of this section, the metropolitan special
taxing district's advertisement must only be published in the
Minneapolis Star and Tribune and the Saint Paul Pioneer Press.
http://www.revisor.leg.state.rnn.us/stats/2 7 5/065 .htrnl
Page 6 of 14
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
(b) The advertisement for school districts, metropolitan
special taxing districts, and regional library districts must be
in the following form, except that the notice for a school
district may include references to the current budget in regard
to proposed property taxes.
"NOTICE OF
PROPOSED PROPERTY TAXES
(School District/Metropolitan
Special Taxing District/Regional
Library District) of .........
The governing body of ........ will soon hold budget hearings
and vote on the property taxes for (metropolitan special taxing
district/regional library district services that will be
provided in (year)/school district services that will be
provided in (year) and (year)).
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
All concerned citizens are invited to attend a public hearing
and express their opinions on the proposed (school
district/metropolitan special taxing district/regional library
district) budget and property taxes, or in the case of a school
district, its current budget and proposed property taxes,
payable in the following year. The hearing will be held on
(Month/Day/Year) at (Time) at (Location, Address)."
(c) The advertisement for cities and counties must be in
the following form.
"NOTICE OF PROPOSED
TOTAL BUDGET AND PROPERTY TAXES
The (city/county) governing body or board of commissioners will
hold a public hearing to discuss the budget and to vote on the
amount of property taxes to collect for services the
(city/county) will provide in (year).
SPENDING: The total budget amounts below compare
(citY's/county'S) (year) total actual budget with the amount the
(city/county) proposes to spend in (year).
(Year) Total
Actual Budget
Proposed (Year)
Budget
Change from
(Year)-(Year)
$. . . . . . .
$. . . . . . .
!1-
. . . 0
TAXES: The property tax amounts below compare that portion of
the current budget levied in property taxes in (city/county) for
(year) with the property taxes the (city/county) proposes to
collect in (year).
http://www.revisor.1eg.state.mn.us!stats!2 7 5!065 .html
Page 7 of 14
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
Page 8 of 14
(Year) Property
Taxes
Proposed (Year)
Property Taxes
Change from
(Year) - (Year)
$. . . . . . .
$. . . . . . .
9-
. . . 0
ATTEND THE PUBLIC HEARING
All (city/county) residents are invited to attend the public
hearing of the (city/county) to express your opinions on the
budget and the proposed amount of (year) property taxes. The
hearing will be held on:
(Month/Day/Year/Time)
(Location/Address)
If the discussion of the budget cannot be completed, a time and
place for continuing the discussion will be announced at the
hearing. You are also invited to send your written comments to:
(City/County)
(Location/Address)"
(d) For purposes of this subdivision, the budget amounts
listed on the advertisement mean:
(1) for cities, the total government fund expenditures, as
defined by the state auditor under section 471.6965, less any
expenditures for improvements or services that are specially
assessed or charged under chapter 429, 430, 435, or the
provisions of any other law or charter; and
(2) for counties, the total government fund expenditures,
as defined by the state auditor under section 375.169, less any
expenditures for direct payments to recipients or providers for
the human service aids listed below:
(i) Minnesota family investment program under chapters 256J
and 256K;
(ii) medical assistance under sections 256B.041,
subdivision 5, and 256B.19, subdivision 1;
(iii) general assistance medical care under section
256D.03, subdivision 6;
(iv) general assistance under section 256D.03, subdivision
2 ;
(v) emergency assistance under section 256J.48;
(vi) Minnesota supplemental aid under section 256D.36,
subdivision 1;
(vii) preadmission screening under section 256B.0911, and
alternative care grants under section 256B.0913;
http://www.revisor.1eg.state.mn.us/stats/27 5/065 .html
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
Page 9 of 14
(viii) general assistance medical care claims processing,
medical transportation and related costs under section 256D.03,
subdivision 4;
(ix) medical transportation and related costs under section
256B.0625, subdivisions 17 to l8a;
(x) group residential housing under section 2561.05,
subdivision 8, transferred from programs in clauses (iv) and
(vi); or
(xi) any successor programs to those listed in clauses (i)
to (x).
(e) A city with a population of over 500 but not more than
2,500 must advertise by posted notice as defined in section
645.12, subdivision 1. The advertisement must be posted at the
time provided in paragraph (a). It must be in the form required
in paragraph (b).
(f) For purposes of this subdivision, the population of a
city is the most recent population as determined by the state
demographer under section 4A.02.
(g) The commissioner of revenue, subject to the approval of
the chairs of the house and senate tax committees, shall
prescribe the form and format of the advertisement.
Subd. 6. Public hearing; adoption of budget and levy.
(a) For purposes of this section, the following terms shall
have the meanings given:
(1) "Initial hearing" means the first and primary hearing
held to discuss the taxing authority's proposed budget and
proposed property tax levy for taxes payable in the following
year, or, for school districts, the current budget and the
proposed property tax levy for taxes payable in the following
year.
(2) "Continuation hearing" means a hearing held to complete
the initial hearing, if the initial hearing is not completed on
its scheduled date.
(3) "Subsequent hearing" means the hearing held to adopt
the taxing authority's final property tax levy, and, in the case
of taxing authorities other than school districts, the final
budget, for taxes payable in the following year.
(b) Between November 29 and December 20, the governing
bodies of a city that has a population over 500, county,
metropolitan special taxing districts as defined in subdivision
3, paragraph (i), and regional library districts shall each hold
an initial public hearing to discuss and seek public comment on
its final budget and property tax levy for taxes payable in the
following year, and the governing body of the school district
shall hold an initial public hearing to review its current
budget and proposed property tax levy for taxes payable in the
following year. The metropolitan special taxing districts shall
be required to hold only a single joint initial public hearing,
the location of which will be determined by the affected
http://www.revisor.1eg.state.mn.us/stats/2 7 5/065 .html
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
metropolitan agencies.
(c) The initial hearing must be held
scheduled on a day other than Saturday.
be held on a Sunday.
after 5:00 p.m. if
No initial hearing may
(d) At the initial hearing under this subdivision, the
percentage increase in property taxes proposed by the taxing
_authority, if any, and the specific purposes for which property
tax revenues are being increased must be discussed. During the
discussion, the governing body shall hear comments regarding a
proposed increase and explain the reasons for the proposed
increase. The public shall be allowed to speak and to ask
questions. At the public hearing, the school district must also
provide and discuss information on the distribution of its
revenues by revenue source, and the distribution of its spending
by program area.
(e) If the initial hearing is not completed on its
scheduled date, the taxing authority must announce, prior to
adjournment of the hearing, the date, time, and place for the
continuation of the hearing. The continuation hearing must be
held at least five business days but no more than 14 business
days after the initial hearing. A continuation hearing may not
be held later than December 20 except as provided in paragraphs
(f) and (g). A continuation hearing must be held after 5;00
p.m. if scheduled on a day other than Saturday. No continuation
hearing may be held on a Sunday.
(f) The governing body of a county shall hold its initial
hearing on the first Thursday in December each year, and may
hold additional initial hearings on other dates before December
20 if necessary for the convenience of county residents. If the
county needs a continuation of its hearing, the continuation
hearing shall be held on the third Tuesday in December. If the
third Tuesday in December falls on December 21, the county's
continuation hearing shall be held on Monday, December 20.
(g) The metropolitan special taxing districts shall hold a
joint initial public hearing on the first Wednesday of
December. A continuation hearing, if necessary, shall be held
on the second Wednesday of December even if that second
Wednesday is after December 10.
(h) The county auditor shall provide for the coordination
of initial and continuation hearing dates for all school
districts and cities within the county to prevent conflicts
under clauses (i) and (j).
(i) By August 10, each school board and the board of the
regior.al library district shall certify to the county auditors
of the counties in which the school district or regional library
district is located the dates on which it elects to hold its
initial hearing and any continuation hearing. If a school board
or regional library district does not certify these dates by
August 10, the auditor will assign the initial and continuation
hearing dates. The dates elected or assigned must not conflict
with the initial and continuation hearing dates of the county or
the metropolitan special taxing districts.
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/2 7 5/065 .html
Page 10 of 14
7/25/0 1
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
(j) By August 20, the county auditor shall notify the
clerks of the cities within the county of the dates on which
school districts and regional library districts have elected to
hold their initial and continuation hearings. At the time a
city certifies its proposed levy under subdivision 1 it shall
certify the dates on which it elects to hold its initial hearing
and any continuation hearing. Until September 15, the first and
second Mondays of December are reserved for the use of the
cities. If a city does not certify its hearing dates by
September 15, the auditor shall assign the initial and
continuation hearing dates. The dates elected or assigned for
the initial hearing must not conflict with the initial hearing
dates of the county, metropolitan special taxing districts,
regional library districts, or school districts within which the
city is located. To the extent possible, the dates of the
city's continuation hearing should not conflict with the
continuation hearing dates of the county, metropolitan special
taxing districts, regional library districts, or school
districts within which the city is located. This paragraph does
not apply to cities of 500 population or less.
(k) The county initial hearing date and the city,
metropolitan special taxing district, regional library district,
and school district initial hearing dates must be designated on
the notices required under subdivision 3. The continuation
hearing dates need not be stated on the notices.
(1) At a subsequent hearing, each county, school district,
city over 500 population, and metropolitan special taxing
district may amend its proposed property tax levy and must adopt
a final property tax levy. Each county, city over 500
population, and metropolitan special taxing district may also
amend its proposed budget and must adopt a final budget at the
subsequent hearing. The final property tax levy must be adopted
prior to adopting the final budget. A school district is not
required to adopt its final budget at the subsequent hearing.
The subsequent hearing of a taxing authority must be held on a
date subsequent to the date of the taxing authority's initial
public hearing. If a continuation hearing is held, the
subsequent hearing must be held either immediately following the
continuation hearing or on a date subsequent to the continuation
hearing. The subsequent hearing may be held at a regularly
scheduled board or council meeting or at a special meeting
scheduled for the purposes of the subsequent hearing. The
subsequent hearing of a taxing authority does not have to be
coordinated by the county auditor to prevent a conflict with an
initial hearing, a continuation hearing, or a subsequent hearing
of any other taxing authority. All subsequent hearings must be
held prior to five working days after December 20 of the levy
year. The date, time, and place of the subsequent hearing must
be announced at the initial public hearing or at the
continuation hearing.
(m) The property tax levy certified under section 275.07 by
a city of any population, county, metropolitan special taxing
district, regional library district, or school district must not
exceed the proposed levy determined under subdivision I, except
by an amount up to the sum of the following amounts:
(1) the amount of a school district levy whose voters
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/27 5/065 .html
Page 11 of 14
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
approved a referendum to increase taxes under section 123B.63,
subdivision 3, or 126C.17, subdivision 9, after the proposed
levy was certified;
(2) the amount of a city or county levy approved by the
voters after the proposed levy was certified;
(3) the amount of a levy to pay principal and interest on
_bonds approved by the voters under section 475.58 after the
proposed levy was certified;
(4) the amount of a levy to pay costs due to a natural
disaster occurring after the proposed levy was certified, if
that amount is approved by the commissioner of revenue under
subdivision 6a;
(5) the amount of a levy to pay tort judgments against a
taxing authority that become final after the proposed levy was
certified, if the amount is approved by the commissioner of
revenue under subdivision 6a;
(6) the amount of an increase in levy limits certified to
the taxing authority by the commissioner of children, families,
and learning or the commissioner of revenue after the proposed
levy was certified; and
(7) the amount required under section 126C.55.
(n) This subdivision does not apply to towns and special
taxing districts other than regional library districts and
metropolitan special taxing districts.
(0) Notwithstanding the requirements of this section, the
employer is required to meet and negotiate over employee
compensation as provided for in chapter 179A.
Subd. 6a. Approval of commissioner. (a) A taxing
authority may appeal to the commissioner of revenue for
authorization to levy an amount over the amount of the proposed
levy. The taxing authority must provide evidence satisfactory
to the commissioner that it has incurred costs for the purposes
specified in paragraph (b). The commissioner may approve an
increase in the taxing authority's levy of up to the amount of
costs incurred or a lesser amount determined by the
commissioner. The commissioner's decision is final.
(b) A levy addition may be made under paragraph (a) for the
following costs incurred after the proposed levy is certified:
(1) the unreimbursed costs to satisfy judgments rendered against
the taxing authority by a court of competent jurisdiction in a
tort action in excess of $50,000 or ten percent of the current
year's proposed certified levy whichever is less; and (2) the
costs incurred in clean up of a natural disaster. For purposes
of this subdivision, "natural disaster" includes the occurrence
or threat of widespread or severe damage, injury, or loss of
life or property resulting from causes such as earthquake, fire,
flood, windstorm, wave action, oil spill, water contamination,
air contamination, or drought.
Subd. 6b.
Joint public hearings. Notwithstanding any
http://www.revisor.1eg.state.mn.us/statsl2 7 5/065 .html
Page 12 of 14
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
other provision of law, any city with a population of 10,000 and
over, may conduct a more comprehensive public hearing than is
contained in subdivision 6 by including a board member from the
county, a board member from the school district located within
the city's boundary, and a representative of the metropolitan
council, if the city is in the metropolitan area, as defined in
section 473.121, subdivision 2, at the city's public hearing.
All provisions regarding the public hearings under subdivision 6
_are applicable to the joint public hearings under this
subdivision.
Upon the adoption of a resolution by the governing body of
the city to hold a joint hearing, the city shall notify the
county, the school district, and the metropolitan council if the
city is in the metropolitan area, of the decision to hold a
joint public hearing and request a board member from each of
those taxing authorities, and the member or the designee of the
metropolitan council if applicable, to be at the joint hearing.
If the city is located in more than one county, the city may
choose to request a county board member from each county or only
from the county containing the majority of the city's market
value. If more than one school district is partially or totally
located within the city, the city may choose to request a school
district board member from each school district, or a board
member only from the school district containing the majority of
the city's market value. If, as a result of requests under this
subdivision, there are not sufficient board members in the
county or the school district to attend the joint hearing, the
county or school district may send a nonelected person working
for its taxing authority to speak on the authority's behalf.
The city may also invite each state senator and representative
who represents the city, or a portion of the city, to come to
the joint hearing.
The primary purpose of the joint hearing is to discuss the
city's budget and property tax levy. The county and school
district officials, and metropolitan council representative, if
the city is in the metropolitan area, should be prepared to
answer questions relevant to its budget and levy and the effect
that its levy has on the property owners in the city.
If a city conducts a hearing under this subdivision, this
hearing is in lieu of the initial hearing required under
subdivision 6. However, the city is still required to adopt its
proposed property tax levy at a subsequent hearing as provided
under subdivision 6. The hearings under this subdivision do not
relieve a county, school district, or the metropolitan council
of the requirement to hold its individual hearing under
subdivision 6.
Sued. 7. Certification of compliance. At the time
the taxing authority certifies its tax levy under section
275.07, it shall certify to the commissioner of revenue its
compliance with this section. The certification must contain
the information required by the commissioner of revenue to
determine compliance with this section. If the commissioner
determines that the taxing authority has failed to substantially
comply with the requirements of this section, the commissioner
of revenue shall notify the county auditor. The decision of the
commissioner is final. When fixing rates under section 275.08
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/2 7 5/065 .html
Page 13 of 14
7/25/01
Minnesota Statutes 2000, 275.065
for a taxing authority that has not complied with this section,
the county auditor must use the taxing authority's previous
year's levy, plus any additional amounts necessary to pay
principal and interest on general obligation bonds of the taxing
authority for which its taxing powers have been pledged if the
bonds were issued before 1989.
Subd. 8. Hearing. Notwithstanding any other
_provision of law, Ramsey county, the city of St. Paul, and
independent school district No. 625 are authorized to and shall
hold their initial public hearing jointly. The hearing must be
held on the second Tuesday of December each year. The
advertisement required in subdivision 5a may be a joint
advertisement. The hearing is otherwise subject to the
requirements of this section.
Ramsey county is authorized to hold an additional initial
hearing or hearings as provided under this section, provided
that any additional hearings must not conflict with the initial
or continuation hearing dates of the other taxing districts.
However, if Ramsey county elects not to hold such additional
initial hearing or hearings, the joint initial hearing required
by this subdivision must be held in a St. Paul location
convenient to residents of Ramsey county.
HIST: 1988 c 719 art 5 s 30; lSp1989 c 1 art 2 s 11; art 9 s
31-38; 1990 c 604 art 3 s 23-26; 1991 c 130 s 28,37; 1991 c 199
art 2 s 20; 1991 c 265 art 9 s 64-66; 1991 c 291 art 5 s 1-3;
1992 c 499 art 8 s 21; art 12 s 24,29; 1992 c 511 art 3 s 2-7;
art 5 s 8; 1992 c 603 s 24; 1993 c 224 art 1 s 30; 1993 c 271 s
3; 1993 c 375 art 3 s 24; art 7 s 9-12,29; art 12 s 10; 1994 c
416 art 1 s 25-27; 1994 c 510 art 1 s 8; 1994 c 587 art 3 s 10;
art 7 s 5; 1994 c 628 art 3 s 23,24; 1995 c 264 art 3 s 14,15;
art 4 s 4; art 16 s 12; lSp1995 c 3 art 1 s 52; art 16 s 13;
1996 c 305 art 1 s 60; 1996 c 455 art 5 s 1,2; 1996 C 471 art 3
s 16-18,52; art 11 s 2; 1997 c 31 art 3 s 9; 1997 c 231 art 4 s
1-8,12; art 14 s 2; 1998 c 254 art 1 s 79; 1998 c 389 art 3 s
12,13; 1998 c 397 art 11 s 3; 1999 c 159 s 126; 2000 c 260 s 44
Copyright 2000 by the Office of Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota.
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/27 5/065 .html
Page 14 of 14
7/25/01
~. J~~ .~.
l'~le" i ~
.jU'.\..... . ,J
. . ..
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Member
FROM: Teresa Bender, Clerk/Treasurer
SUBJECT: Temporary Agency Employee
DATE: July 25, 2001
I spoke with three (3) Temporary Agencies in regards to obtaining a temporary clerical
person.
Kelly Services charges approximately $16.80 - 18.20 for a skill level of 50 wpm,
Receptionist and customer greeter/helper. Kelly's pays all payroll taxes and benefits.
Temporary employee is guaranteed 4 hours minimum per day.
Manpower charges approximately $17.60 - 19.36 for the same skilled individual and
pays all payroll taxes and benefits. If chosen to hire, negotiate % of yearly salary as
buyout on contract.
Midwest Staffing Group, Inc. approximately $11.00 - $12.00/hour + 1.6% of total earned.
City pays payroll taxes. Minimum contract: 520 hours or 13 weeks.
Staff is aware of an individual that has provided community service hours to the City
recently, who has stated willingness to ascertain employment within the City.
Council/Staff may consider arranging a contract on their own instead of the services
listed above which seem costly.