Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-09-13 CC CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2000 6:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call II. SET AGENDA III. PUBLIC HEARING (8) 1. Nortbern Forest Products - Tax Abatement Hearing (Carolyn Drude and Sid Inman) IV. APPEARANCES/A W ARD8 1. Eagle Pass Townbome Association 2. Rock'n Hollywoods at Kelly's Korner, Adult Sport Leagues (Bill Bisek) V. CONSIDERA TION OF MINUTES 1. August 23,2000 Meeting Minutes VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS 1. The City of Centerville August 24, 2000 through September 13, 2000 2. Centennial Fire District Expenses 3. Hunter's Crossing Pay Estimate #1 VII. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS VBI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Hunter's Crossing Financing - Juran and Moody (George Eilertson) Resolution 00-17 - providing for the issuance and sale of $650,000 general obligation improvement bonds of 2000 Resolution 00-20 - calling for an assessment bearing on September 27tb, 2000 IX. NEW BUSINESS 1. 2001 Fete des Lacs Committee Structure (Ray DeVine) 2. Holiday Party 3. Proposed Chain of Lakes YMCA 4. Storm Sewer Realignment - Lloyd Drilling (1873 Main Street) 5. 2001 Budget Resolution 00-18 - approving tax rate increase Resolution 00-19 - approving initial tax levy X. CONSENT AGENDA XI. COMMITTEE REPORTS XII. ADMINISTRA TOR'S REPORT XIII. ADJOURNMENT MEMO DATE: September 8, 2000 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE : Northern Forest Products Tax Abatement ............................................................................ Included in your packet is a letter that was received from Paul McDowell at Northern Forest Products. Mr. McDowell illustrates a number of concerns that he has with the original establishment of his tax increment district. Mr. McDowell further indicates that he is desirous of expanding his business and mentions that he has discussed locating his expansion in Hugo to be near rail access. Mr. McDowell is requesting a five-year tax abatement as an incentive for Northern Forest Products to expand in the community. The abatement would only be granted for five years ifthere is an actual expansion. Only a one-year abatement would be granted, if no expansion occurred. Ifthe Council is willing to grant this abatement, a new public hearing will have to be held. The abatement would only be granted for the increased market v;;.Iuation, not for the existing building valuation. Sid Inman and Carolyn Drude from Ehlers and Assoc. will be present to discuss this issue with Council. Sid Inman will be bringing an impact analysis to show the costs of the requested abatement. I believe it is quite important to keep this business expansion and new jobs within the community. . 4 Mr. Jim March City of Cer'lterJille 1880 Main St. Centerville, MN 55036.9794 orthern Forest Products 050 Main Street Centervdle, Minnesota 55038 ?h01e 651-429-9990 t=ax 651-429-99~ptember 6, 2000 Dear Jim: I would like to express my concerns regarding the prOPo$ed documents for the City Council meeting on Septemcer 13,2000. There has been much discus!lon regarding t!1e reasons for the tox Increment available being less than the 'amount shown or. tl'le original payment schedules. 1 would li!<! to comment briefly on each item 1) Reduction In commerclal.lndustrial rates. H has been stated tl'1at "most o~ the oecrease" in the available tax increment IS related to this area. I do understand that the Ciass rates have decreased from 1997 through 1999. but I also ~ee that the Local7ax Rate muitipiier has prcgressed from 134.036% in 1997 to 153.788% in 1999. This multiplier has effectively negat@d the redudon in the class rates. The bottom lil"\6 is that my property taxes have not gone down, if you evaluate the taxes in 1 e97 through 2000 assuming a flat marKet value. I would imagine jf 1 had the time or energy to delve I~to the formula for defining available tax increment, I may discover that the Local Tax Rate mu:tiplier has no bearing on the calculatio". This does not r'leke sense to me but maybe this is rlow It [$ da1'll1ed in the "Tax Increment Act.. I do Know that this is in direct contradiction to the spirit of how the Tl F' incentive was presented to me by the former city administration. I did..mdersta!'1d that available tal< increment c:ouilJ be lowered by my taxes being lower, but that seemed like a pretty even trade at the tirre. 2) ,997 market value of $327,700 VS. minimum $527,700 Thl$ item is very straightforward. Northern Forest Products obviously received the bene'flt of paying a lower property tax than was assumed in the T1F documents for tne first year. It especially makes sense th91: Rehbein's payment schedule shOuld not be impacted by tf\ls set of circumstances, I de have ar issue with how Ehier's compucEld the $17,255.(;2 'oack taxes am::unt." I may not be rooking at this correctly, but I would think my additlor;al taxes for the extra $200,000 of market value would have been approximately $12,331 ($200,000 x ,046 x 1.34036). It $eems tha: this Eimount would then be reduced by some magic formula to come up with the available tax increment that WOJld have been ge:Jerated from my additIonal payment. If my ca)ct.;lat:on is correc~ this will only make the ending balance at the end cfthe T1F dIstrict larger than currenty preser,ted. It would also maKe me sven more skeptical tI'1an I already am of whet:1er the most recent Ehler's schedules a~e represented with current lilr:c accurate information (the 2/10/99 and 8{11/99 payments to developer shoulc be shown on the proper lines). 3) Lerger-thei1-ex!:lee~ed base value inflation faotor . I believe that it was estimated at an earlier ~etin9 thet thiS "small portion" of the shortfall was approximately $3000. This appears to be an area that no or.e wants to spend much time discussing, maybe because of the so-called insignificant amou nt, but maybe because of the continued embarlClssment to Ehlers and the way they handled this situation too III Sl)naOHd lS~Od NH3HLHON C666 6in TS9 XV.:! CZ: tt cra1\ 00/90/60 ( This last item does come oack to bother me, especially when I see a $67,000 ending oalance assuming we do not buIld our expansion project in Centervi:le. M I have mentioned In our previous discussions and meetings wittl Rehbein representative$, I ;,ave a strong desire to see this matter settled ralrly for al! parties involved. However, it appears that everyone wants Northern Forest Products to assume the rIsks of the 'what 17$" and uncert;.lnties relating to the fJture. When we left the last meeting with all parties involved, the pian was ic attempt to see if 50mething could be put together to reasonably account for the shortfall in the available tax increment. VlJhat \ see entha table right now is an approximate $57,000 end c:fTlF district balenc& and an offer for a $9300 tax abatemenl It seems that every time Ehlers puts together a new schedule, the ending balance shortfall grows. When you consider the fact tnat my original se!'1edule showed Nortr,ern Forest Products receiving $200, 691.18 of principal and !l'Ite"est over the ii-year life, the fact that a $57,000 balance witl remaIn is pretty s:gnificant. The possibility t!",at this could even grow to be a larger aMount jf class rates go down (witr,out an actual true overall ti!lX rate de,:rease Ie me) makes me wonder hoW much of en incentive there was for Northem Forest Products tc locate in Centerv;Ue I am appreciative of your offer for the one-year tex abatement. If this Is the only option we have to redl..ce the spread between the origInal schedules and the current $chedu~es, it would obviously not make sense for T!1e tc decline this offer. However, due to the fact that such a large amour,t remains, 1 would not be willing to share more than Northern Forest Products' share of the shortfall. ! will not sIgn a~y documents until Rehbein's shere of the exposure r<;>I;;.t1r's ~::: '~"rn," -:f. 1 .Q. it ~ Ie; p>V;!,IUftT"''' .....rl corre~t6d i'i tre D~vment schedules I do not feel that our future expansion plans should be relevant to resolving this !ituaton. I feel that jf we oecide to expand, our expansion should be viewed sel=arately in terms of a comMunity analyzing whether assistance should be provided for ~he expa:1si:Jn. As we hav9 analyzed our need to grow, we have determined recently that rail access could be E significant factor in our ability to be competiti....e in a new product li~e we. have -e.:ently 'nlrtlduced. I have !'\ad discussions w:th a commercial developer irl Hugo regarding land that 1$ availablE! on rail, ar.a Hugo is offering TIF for these lots. My ~eason for t&lllng YOll this is to be ronesl about tMe decis:o!1$ we are facir:g In choosing the best option fo~ OU~ f\.Jtune. My desire is truly to stay in, and grow our busin8$$ln CenterviHe, I would iik.e to propose ar. al~ematilJe solution for you to consider. My propos~1 would eO/'1sist of a tax icatement similsr to wt:at you are offering, but would ,;xtend for 5 years after the TIF district ended, This could be similarly capped at the $25,000 annual amount. and would be contingent on Northern Forest Products adding a minimum of $400.COO of market value sometime before 2002. , feel this would be a good inoentve for LJS to expand in Centerville. as the original TIJ= note would most likely be paid in fUll. AND we would be receiving an ince~tive directly related to our Expansion that would be signifjeent enol,;gh to forego r411l ac::ess. If this could be accomplish~d, I would feel it wouid not be necEssary to assess the Retibein balance for the exposure related to Items # 1 & # 3 above. If we did net expanc in Centerville, tl1e 1-year tax abatement assistance would still be in effect 2 600 III Sl~DaO~d lsa~Od Na3HL~ON \':666 6<:t tS9 l'Yd CG:f:"l (l3:.ft 00/90/60 ., I realize the timing of me suggesting this altsmati\le is not the ~reate$t for you w:th the coundl meeting set for next Wednesday. I would be willing to look at something \....here we could reduce the. arr.ount of paperwork that needed :0 be changed, but looked at my i'roposal es some:hing that could be ~nished at a leter date. eS5:.Jming there was a f:avorable reCictlon to the proposal. A few othtr thir,gs we have discussed but I would like to get down in writing: . , feel the wording of the new docul'r'ent$ suggests t/",8t the 1-year abatement is being provided to induce Northam Forest Pioducts to exp;nCl. AS we have discussed, this needs to somehow be changed to make it va:y clear that there: are no strings attached . I need to have a $chedule prep~red by Ehiers with t.l'le current stat.ls of the notes once we have resolved our issl./es. This must be accurate, and should at least have a good "starting pain:" as of 9/15/00 documented and made part o~ the new agreement. I realize the schecu!e may change in the Mure but we need to establish what ttle balance is a: the start 0" any new agreement. 1 cl.:r;,ently have about 15 different Ehlers schedules and they arl!; ail different. Please call me to review this letter at your convenienoe. Paul McDowel! 3 ~oo WI Sl)naD~d ~Sg~Od NM~O~ 1:686 an Hfl IVd tz: 1'1 (}3,1i 00/90/60 MEMO DATE: September 7, 2000 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE : Eagle Pass T ownhome Association ............................................................................ A representative from the Eagle Pass townhome owner's association is scheduled to appear before Council. The representative would like to discuss enforcement of the developer's agreement, street lighting in the development and concerns/issues with any future development of the two outlots that would be tied to their association. Jim March To: -ubject: Jim Halstrom RE: Council Meeting Thanks for the e-mail! If you can get me any prepared statement you may have I can place that item in the Council packet. The packets will be assembled and delivered tomorrow. I will have public works address weeds that may have washed out in the street and that are covering the catch basins. I hope that your association will have some comment on the location of the portable toilet in the park and desired screening. The park and recreation committee has been discussing this item. See you next week. JM -----Original Message----- From: Jim Halstrom [mailto:jghalst@co.chisago.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 11:42 AM To: jmarch@centervillemn.COM Cc: thalstrom@allina.com; jwoodrow@gassencompany.COM; lamiller@mmrn.COM Subject: Council Meeting Hi Jim. Just to let you know that the following will be attending next week's council meeting from the Board of Directors of the Eagle Pass Single Townhome Association. Jim Juhl, President; Tracie Halstrom, Secretary; Dan Witham, Board Member; Geri Boerner, Board Member; Larry Miller, Landscape Committee; Jim Halstrom, Landscape Committee. Jim Juhl and I will speak for the Association on maintenance of the development; sod issues; street lighting; the park; and our concerns about the outlot. I'll keep it brief and will have a prepared statement which I will get to you ahead of time. Thanks again for your efforts on the street sweeping and weed cutting. I'm told that the street sweepers really worked hard all that day, and then Swift came back later and cut the weeds, and it looks a lot better, but the weeds went back in the street and are covering nutters in places. Believe Swift needs to come back and clean up the weed cuttings on 'dewalks, streets, and gutters. ~ ! Single Townhomes of Eagle Pass Owner's Association do Tracie Halstrom, Secretary 6960 Dupre Rd Centervilk, MN 55038 September 8, 2000 Mr. Jim March City Administrator City of Centerville 1880 Main St Centerville, MN 55038 1. References. a. City of Centerville Ordinance #8, titled "Centervi11e Subdivision Ordinance", as amended. b. Development Contract for Eagle Pass, between the City of CenterWle and Gor-em, LLC, developer of Eagle Pass, dated 9 December 1996. c. Our letter, dated 12 November 1999, concerning insufficient street lighting. d. Our letter, dated 27 July 2000, concerning construction site maintenance issues within the Eagle Pass development. e. Centerville City Administrator letter to our Association, dated 25 August 2000, responding to d above. 2. Purpose. To address to the City Council of Centerville our issues and concerns with respect to the on-going development of Eagle Pass; to request City assistance in enforcing current city ordinances and agreements relative to Eagle Pass; and to make recommendations for future oversight of subdivision developments by the city. 3. Discussion. a. The single to\vnhome homeowners of Eagle Pass were given control of our association by the Developer on June 13, 2000. Of the currently planned 59 units in our development, 39 are occupied and an additional 1 0 have been sold or are being built/maintained as models. The prices of our units range from $180,000 to over $240,000, and represent a considerable investment to our homeowners, and a lucrative tax base for the city of Centerville and Anoka County. . b. Our homeowners are generally proud of our individual units and with the ultimate vision of our completed development. However, our issues and concerns with the developer (Gor-em, LLC) and contractor (Swift Construction) relative to on-going site construction in the development have existed since the frrst unit was occupied in 1997. Most of our issues and concerns are covered by existing city ordinance and agreement with the developer (references Ia and Ib above) and can be resolved by the city simply enforcing the same. These issues and concerns, most of which are addressed by references Ic and Id above, include the following: (1) Regular Sweeping of Streets and Sidewalks throughout the development. This is required periodically by agreement between the city and the developer, and until very recently, has not been done. This should be enforced by routine inspections of the development by the city. (2) Ongoing Pick-up of Construction Debris. Construction sites and open lots in the development are often littered with construction debris and material. If not already provided for, the city should require daily cleanup of construction sites by the contractor, and removal of such material as pallets, concrete blocks, bricks, etc., when they are no longer needed. Other cities require such daily site maintenance. Centerville should do the same. (3) Regular Maintenance and Control of Weeds in undeveloped lots and along sidewalks. This is required by agreement between the city and the developer, and until very recently, has not been done. This should be enforced by routine inspections of the development by the city. (4) Silt Fencing at Construction Sites. If not already provided for, the city should require silt fencing at all unit construction sites and undeveloped lots to inhibit the erosion of soil onto the streets. Other cities require such fencing, and Centerville should do the same. (5) Inspection of Site Grading and Sodding Practices. The agreement at reference I h provides for four inches of comparable soil being emplaced prior to sodding. This has never been done in our development. Sod is routinely placed over weeds, rocks, utility flags, etc. Our grounds maintenance crew has never seen the likes of the inadequate grading and sodding that exist in our development. The city should enforce this requirement as part of its' routine building inspection procedures during unit construction, to insure both the required proper grading and sodding topsoil. (6) Cleaning of Storm Sewer Grills. Construction debris and weeds often block these grills. They should be monitored by routine inspections of the development by the city and remedied by the contractor when required. -2- ~ . (7) Street Lighting. The issue of inadequate street lighting was first addressed to the city council by reference 1 c. At that time, the city indicated that Christmas lights in the development made an assessment of this issue unfeasible, and deferred action until a time when the Christmas lights were no longer present. Nothing has been done since that time. The agreement at reference Ib calls for "approximately 15 lights" and there are 151ights in the development. But "approximately" can mean 13 lights just as easily as it can mean 17 lights. The bottom line should be that of what is required for adequate night vision and safety. Our development is characterized by winding roads, and whole sections are left without adequate lighting for safe driving and pedestrian traffic at night. We implore the council to immediately review this issue through an on-site inspection with our association representatives. (8) Eagle Park Issues. We are concerned about the sport stand in the park and what it is supposed to represent. We understand that discussions are on-going. Our own view is that the stand is useless as a tennis court without fencing, and can best be utilized by simply placing basketball goals on each end of the stand. With respect to the portable toilet at the entrance to the park, we believe it can best be disguised by either landscape trees, or by fencing that will disguise it while at the same time allowing for maintenance access. (9) Future Outlot Development. Recent sketches obtained from Swift's sales representative are promoting the addition of 20 single townhome units in Outlot B. Prospective additions include: . -- Five units directly off of Dupre and Street "C". A private road off of Dupre with 7 units. -- An extension of Ojibway (existing private road with twinhomes) to have 8 units. Since this involves 2 more private roads, the impact to our development is huge. Homeowners (twin and single units) must pay for snow removal from these roads. We also need to build reserve funds for future reswfacing. The extension of Ojibway would create even more problems as that private road would be owned by two associations. Our questions to the City are: Who is responsible for any sewer problems on any current or future private road, the City or the Association? Is it possible to make these proposed private roads into city streets? What specifications define a city street vs a private road? According to our bylaws: -- Statutory Notice from the :tv1N Common Interest Ownership Act, Section 3 General Description states: "Initially the common interest community will contain 59 units. It is contemplated by the declarant and approved in principle by the City that the total development will eventually consist of a total of 66 units." -3- . Section 16.1 states: "The total number of units which may be included in the additional property shall not exceed 18 units". Because of these statements in our bylaws, the 20 additional planned units would exceed our association limits. We suggest that any new additions have their own association. We do not want the responsibility of more private roads. It may even be a conflict of interest for two separate corporations (associations) to own and maintain the same private road (Ojibway). In addition, we do not know of any homeowners who were told prior to closing that the Association owns and is responsible for the maintenance of existing or future private roads; nor is there any disclosure of this in the bylaws and declaration. We assumed all roads were, in fact, city streets. We appreciate the recent efforts by City Administrator Jim March (reference Ie ahove) to correct some of the above deficiencies and to work and communicate with us on our issues and concerns. Again, we are proud of the ultimate vision for our development; we just believe strongly that certain construction standards should be maintained or initiated as addressed above. We also have severe reselVations about the inc01poration of any outlots into our association. The city of Centerville is evolving into a great community, and should lead the way in upholding and maintaining those standards. Your every consideration of our issues and concerns is greatly appreciated. FOR OUR ASSOCIATION HOMEOWNERS: JIM JUHL, President TRACIE HALSTROM, Secretary DAN WITHAL, Board Member GERRY BURNER, Board Member -4- MEMO DATE: September 7, 2000 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE : Rockin' Hollywoods at Kelly's Komer, Adult Sport Leagues ............................................................................ Mr. Bill Bisek would like to appear before Council to discuss two items. The fIrst item is the third annual Kelly's Komer Customer Appreciation Event. The Rockin' Hollywoods will be performing outside during the evening on October 14th from 8 - 12. There will also be a hog roast. Mr. Bisek is requesting a noise permit for this event. I do not recall any complaints from last year's event. The second item Mr. Bisek would like to address is adult sport leagues. Mr. Bisek would :~:~.:: :;:: :::: :~-:..:.: ~~~:, :-::'-.: ~:~~:::- .: !!:/':.!! !~:.;;"-:::::: ~::::= :-"-:,' t.,C'ckey or broombcl11oCl::'''C>C" in the winter. Mr. Bisek would also like to see an adult softball league operated in the summer months. Mr. Bisek appeared at the Park and Recreation Committee meeting on September 6th. The Park and Recreation Committee is supportive of the concept. Mr. Bisek would like to approach the Council and discuss his concept in more detail. CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 23, 2000 6:00 p.m. I Not Approved I Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on August 23,2000, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Mayor Tom Wilharbcr Council Member Dick Travis Council Member Terry Sweeney Council Member Linda Broussard Vickers Council Member Mari Nelson ABSENT: None STAFF: City Administrator, Jim March City Attorney, James Hoeft City Engineer, Tom Peterson I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Wilharber called the August 23, 2000 City Council meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. II. SET AGENDA The following items were added to the agenda: . Ordinance #4 under Unfinished Business . Correspondence from Lloyd Drilling under Unfinished Business . City Hall Generator under New Business Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Nelson to approve the agenda with noted additions. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. III. PUBLIC HEARING (8) Ordinance #4 . Mr. March stated this was a public hearing to discuss the final changes made to Ordinance #4 as the recreational vehicle length was being increased to thirty-five (35) feet and minor language being amended to the whereabouts vehicles could be parked. He noted recreational vehicles could not be parked in the right-of-way of any driveway. Mr. March indicated the side setback was being changed to five (5) feet and ten (10) feet for the rear yard setback. Dawn Sperry, 6913 Tourville Circle, indicated she lives next to a rental home that is storing full-sized dump trucks in their driveway. She noted the police have been notified of the noise pollution that these vehicles are creating for the residents in her cul-de-sac. Mayor Wilharber noted Ms. Sperry did the correct thing by contacting the police with this issue and explained that Ordinance #4 would restrict the storage of dump trucks within residential neighborhoods. Ray DeVine, Planning and Zoning Commission member, asked if weight restrictions were going to be set on construction vehicles being stored within residential areas. Mr. March noted this was not contained in the Ordinance at this time. Council Member Nelson asked if satellites could be stored between a park and residential area. Mr. March noted Ordinance #4 does not address public land at this time. Council Member Travis asked how dump trucks were being restricted within a residential area. Mr. March noted the exact types of vehicles were not spelled out, but the Ordinance does refer to small construction vehicles. He indicated letters would be sent to all those in violation with commercial vehicles parked in their driveway. He asked the City Attorney to comment on this item. Mr. Hoeft noted that at any time a citation is issued under this Ordinance a six- person jury within the community would decide the definition if a problem were to arise. Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Nelson to close the public hearing. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. IV. APPEARANCES/AWARDS Milo Bennett, Centennial Fire Chief - City/Fire Hall Generator Chief Bennett addressed the Council regarding a placement of a generator at City Hall. He indicated the fire hall is also being proposed for a generator. Chief Bennett explained the generator would allow the City Hall to function in emergency situations. He noted he acquired three quotes for the Council to review and respond to. Chief Bennett noted the low bid was from Gephart Electric in the amount of $34,780. He indicated there would be charitable gambling funds available for the purchase of the generator in the amount of $17,500, which would reduce the funding needed from the City. Mayor Wilharber asked if the generator would be run on natural gas and how that worked. Chief Bennett stated the generator would run on natural gas and is powered by the pressure within the pipelines. He explained the generator would . start within three (3) to five (5) seconds of the power going down. 2 Council Member Nelson indicated she was in favor of the purchase as she felt this was a good suggestion for the City Hall offices. Mayor Wilharber asked if any funding was allocated for this item last year. Mr. March stated funding was not allocated specifically, but stated funds were set aside for capital improvements and road improvements. V. CONSIDERA TION OF MINUTES August 9. 2000 Council Meeting Minutes Motion by Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Broussard Vickers to approve the August 9. 2000 Council meeting minutes as amended on page 4. paragraph 5. to remove "if' from the first sentence. and page 8 paragraph 5 to remove "and increased public liability insurance" from the first sentence. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS The City ofCenterville August 10 through August 23. 2000 Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Travis to approve the expenditures for the City from August 10. 2000 through August 23.2000. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Centennial Fire District Expenses Motion bv Council Member Sweenev, seconded bv Council Member Nelson to approve the Centennial Fire District expenditures in the amount of $16.954.13. All in favor. :\lotion carried unanimously. VII. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS Keith Okan - Eagle Park Satellite Placement Council Member Nelson noted she received a complaint that the satellite placement in Eagle Park was too close to his property line. She indicated he would like it to be moved to allow him to greater enjoy his lot. Council Member Nelson explained Mr. Okan would like to see the structure enclosed or bolted down to assure it would not be tipped over. She indicated she spoke with Karla DeVine on the Parks and Recreation Commission and noted the item was dropped at their August meeting. Council Member Sweeney indicated the location and access of the satellite was placed at that location for cleaning purposes. He stated the trees in the area also allow for screening and protection from the unit being tipped. Council Member Sweeney stated the Parks and Recreation Commission held numerous discussions about the placement of each unit within the parks. He noted they felt this was the best placement at the time. 3 Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if the unit could be moved ten (10) feet away from the property line. Mr. Palzer stated the unit is currently three (3) feet from the property line and could not be on the other side of the trail as it is private property . Mayor Wilharber inquired if the unit could be placed near the sidewalk to remain accessible and placed on a slab. He stated an enclosure could be built at a later date. Council Member Broussard Vickers stated she would like to see this change made as the accessory structure is closer than five (5) feet to the property line. Mr. Palzer noted the unit could be moved to the suggested location. Council Member Travis noted he would not be voting on this issue because he felt the movement would be opening a can of worms for other property owners near parks. Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council Member Nelson to approve the movement of the satellite in Eagle Park to be ten (10) feet from the propertv line as stated within Ordinance #4 for accessory structures. All in favor. Motion carried. (Sweeney opposed) (Travis abstained). VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS " T" -.".. J..l.UH.t,.\...i ,:) '-'.lV",..:HU_~ J-JH.~U. ~ .1 uu..&.~u. JU-J. y ~U uuu..J.. \-U.;;:'U.:H ./~ _vvv Mr. Hoeft <!ddressed the Council and stated the Title Company wanted ~~ exchange some deeds for the northerly plats. He stated the City did receive an easement for the ditch and the entire waterway was within City property. Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded bv Council Member Nelson to authorize the City Administrator to execute the Quit claim deeds if all land " . - . !s Hill!!!! we Lll} ea~eHACJH or LUr unueu pru(Jci"n Wi" nltuleJ- ~ L1U3~lH~ Ditch. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance #4 Council Member Broussard Vickers noted she would like an update on how grand-fathering worked with items not in compliance with the Ordinance. Mr. Hoeft stated he would address all future items as they arose. He noted an amortization could be placed on non-conforming uses to gain compliance over a number of years if the Council so desired. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked how the dump truck issue would be handled. Mr. Hoeft indicated a letter would be sent out to the homeowner requesting compliance and allowing a reasonable amount of time for compliance. . 4 Council Member Broussard Vickers noted the Planning and Zoning Commission did note they were in favor of allowing residents until next summer for the housing of recreational vehicles. Mr. Hoeft noted the enforcement of the Ordinance was up to Council and Staff. He indicated the City would want to be consistent with the enforcement noting that each lot was unique within the community. Mr. Hoeft stated the Council would need to keep this in mind when considering same. Council Member Travis thanked the Planning and Zoning Commission for their involvement with Ordinance #4. He noted he had several issues with the Ordinance but felt there were too many good things within the Ordinance to hold it up. Mayor Wilharber concurred with Member Travis. Motion by Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Broussard Vickers to approve Ordinance #4 as submitted. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Nelson to enact the Summary of Ordinance #4 as noted in Resolution 00-17 for publication. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Storm Sewer Alignment Mr. Peterson noted the alignment of the storm sewer on the northeast comer of Main Street and Peterson Trail was proposed to be realigned. He noted the cost \\,()111rl np r()llO'hlv ll:ln 1 ~4 ~c: c:nllO'ht n" T 1,",,,,-1 T'l..;l1inn- l\;f.. PDt,.,..r"~ :~r1;~~,~~ - . . there are issues with the Watershed District and this item may need to be reviewed by them prior to gaining City approval. Motion by Mayor Wilharber. seconded by Council Member Nelson to direct staff to advise Lloyd Drilling to approach the Watershed District on this issue before obtaining City approval. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. IX. NEW BUSINESS Northern Forest Products - Resolution #00-16 Mr. March noted Tax Increment Financing (TIF) was allocated to Northern Forest Products in 1995. He stated when the notes were set up, Ehlers created the cash flow analysis showing the repayment schedule for this property. Mr. March noted the landowner was taxed originally at $330,000 versus the proposed $550,000 which created a shortfall in the TIF available. He noted there has been a substantial amount of finger pointing with this issue and the former City Administrator had been discussed. 5 Mr. March noted checks were cut for the developer and landowner for 90% of the amounts paid. He indicated he is proposing a compromise for all parties involved. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if the pay back would be a percentage of the value or a dollar amount. Mr. March indicated the property owners were under the understanding it would be a dollar amount. Mr. March explained two (2) payments had been made to Northern Forest Products. He indicated the City is looking to do a tax abatement for one (1) year to give Paul McDowell the incentive to expand his current building. Mr. March stated Mr. McDowell is not in favor of this as it would keep the City running his business. Mr. March then stated he would like to see Mr. McDowell expand his building and approve the tax abatement with no strings attached. He noted the City is hoping to modify the two (2) notes and go to a closing with Mr. McDowell in September to allow the owner increased incentives. Mr. March noted that Northern Forest Products has created jobs and runs a clean operation within the City. He noted the City is willing to abate up to $25,000 as a maximum based on the size of the addition constructed on the property. Council Member Nelson noted she was in favor of the proposal as it would benefit the City in the long run. She indicated this was a win win situation for all those involved. Motion by Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Broussard Vickers to approve Resolution 00-16 regarding the tax abatement for Northern Forest Products. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 2001 Draft Budget Mr. March indicated that by September 15,2000 the levy amount would need to be set by the City. He stated the City's gross tax capacity was roughly $2,000,000, which was $400,000 higher than the previous year. Mr. March explained this allows the City greater spending power for future years. Mr. March noted the City could levy 1,200,000 at the current tax capacity rate without raising taxes. He indicated he felt this was the consensus of the Council at this time due to the increase in the tax base. Mayor Wilharber asked if the levy limits were still in place by legislature. Mr. March indicated the legislature did eliminate the levy limit increase amounts for next year. Mr. March reviewed the assumptions for 2001 as it related to the budget. He indicated the number of building permits is anticipated to decrease in turn decreasing revenues. Mr. March noted that police costs would increase for 2001 while the aid to small governments would decrease to $45,000. 6 Mr. March noted there would be several workshop meetings for the Council to discuss how to address these items along with PublicWorks issues. Mayor Wilharber questioned when the property east of Hunter's Crossing would reach MUSA. Mr. March noted this parcel would reach the MUSA in 200 1 but indicated he was uncertain if this would be developed within the next year. Mayor Wilharber noted a workshop meeting was set for Wednesday, August 30, 2000 at 6:00 p.m. to discuss the budget in further detail. Hugo Sewage Spill Mr. March explained he has been in contact with the MPCA regarding this issue. He noted the Met Council was going to use the Hugo spill to show the need for better communication. Mr. March noted adequate testing was completed and there was no threat to the environment or the health hazards. Mayor Wilharber asked if the non-recovered sewage was spread into the ground or ran into the creek. Mr. March noted the majority of the spill was spread into the field and the fecal count was reduced when exposed to ultra-violet light. He indicated that the Met Council was not saying whether any portion of the spill was emitted into the creek. City Hall Generator Mayor Wilharber noted that Mr. March indicated there were funds available for the generator and indicated this would be a great asset for the community. Council Member Sweeney concurred. Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Nelson to approve the purchase of a generator for City Hall as presented bv Chief Bennett. All in favor. Motion carried uanimously. X. CONSENT AGENDA - None. XI. COMMITTEE REPORTS · Mayor Wilharber stated a Police Commission meeting \vas held and indicated the budget was discussed. He indicated Circle Pines and Lexington had not approved their portion of the budget as Centerville had. Mayor Wilharber noted Circle Pines is going into further discussions on the budget but Lexington was not willing to budge on the issue. He inquired if the City of Centerville would be interested in paying an additional $5,000 to cover expenses. He noted the $5,000 would cover the increase in the budget as it does not follow the current formula. Mayor Wilharber indicated he felt the $5,000 was a small portion to cover additional expenses for the police department to maintain the same level of coverage. Council Member Sweeney and Council Member Broussard Vickers concurred provided all officers remain. 7 Mr. March stated this was a small amount but noted he was concerned about the formula created within the Police Commission. He added that a letter should be sent to Circle Pines and Lexington to urge them to expect the same level of service from the police department. Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Nelson to advise Mr. March to draft letters to Lexington and Circle Pines regarding the Police Commission budget. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Wilharber asked if the Public Works building was being cleaned at this time. Mr. Palzer noted the completion would be shortly. Mayor Wilharber questioned if the Council would be interested in charging the Police Department rent for use of a portion of the Public Works building. He noted he would not recommend this and Council concurred. XII. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Mr. March indicated there was nothing at this time. YTTT, ADJOURNMENT Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Nelson to adiourn the August 23. 2000 Council Meetinf! at 8:01 p.m. An in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 8 Centennial Fire District 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 784-7472 - Office (651) 784-2427 - Fax September 6, 2000 TO: City Council City of Centerville City Council City of Circle Pines City Council City of Lino Lakes FROM: Milo Bennett SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures and approval for payment of expenses. Your approval of expenses, as listed on the attached copy of the check register, checks #12345 - 12369, in the amount of $5,857.42 is hereby requested. Centennial Fire District Check Register Page 1 of 1 DATE CHECK# NAME ACCOUNT AMOUNT 09/06/2000 12345 American Fastener 42110 - Other Maintenance 6.98 09/06/2000 12346 Amaco Oil Company 42100 - Fuel and Lube 436.71 09/06/2000 12347 Anoka- Technical COllege 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 20.00 09/06/2000 12348 Bill's Rental Center 42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies 61.28 09/06/2000 12349 Circle Pines Uti lites 42251 - Station 1 - Gas 27.28 09/06/2000 12350 Cy's Uniforms 42120 - Uniform Expense 108.85 09/06/2000 12351 David Bruder 40100 - Logistical Expense 64.00 09/06/2000 12352 Eddy Brothers Company 42130 - Equipment Expense 823.50 09/06/2000 12353 Emergency Apparatus Maintenance 42000 - Vehicle Maintenance 898.69 09/06/2000 12354 Frattallone's Hardware 42110- Other Maintenance 198.13 09/06/2000 12355 Frontline Plus Fire & Rescue 42130 - Equipment Expense 1,323.10 CS/Cul'2uOO 12356 Hugo Feed Mill & Elevator 42110 - Other Maintenance 4.74 09/06/2000 12357 Metro Fire 42130 - Equipment Expense 317.18 09/06/2000 12358 Minnesota State Fire Chiefs Association 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 135.00 09/06/2000 12359 Norm's Tire Sales, Inc. 42000 - Vehicle Maintenance 390.14 09/06/2000 12360 Oxygen Service Company, Inc. 42270 - Breathing Air 113.50 09/06/2000 12361 pagenet 42240 - Telephone 148.50 09/06/2000 12362 Paper Direct 42180 - Office Supplies 80.91 09/06/2000 12363 Red Rooster Auto Stores 42110 - Other Maintenance 18.05 09/06/2000 12364 Reliant Energy Min!1egasco 42253 - Station 2 - Gas 52.09 09/06/2000 12365 Sedgwick 42110 - Other Maintenance 49.00 09/06/2000 12366 USI,lnc. 42180 - Office Supplies 64.42 09/06/2000 12367 Verizon Wireless 42240 - Telephone 188.87 09/06/2000 12368 Viking Office Products 42180 - Office Supplies 305.12 09/06/2000 12369 Janet Haapoja 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 21.38 Total $5,857.42 ,. ,~ September 7, 2000 To: City Council City of Circle Pines City Council City of Centerville City Council City of Lino Lakes From: Milo Bennett Subject: Ratification of expenditures and approval for payment of September payroll expense. Your approval of September payroll expense as listed on the attached copy of the check register, checks #5053 - 5099, in the amount of $23,862.43, is hereby requested. mb/nw cc: 7 Circle Pines City Council 7 Centerville City Council 7 Lino Lakes City Council 2 File Sep 07, 2000. 3t5~ PM CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRiCT Page PAYROLL COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER CHECKIt EMP NUM EMPLOYEE ~mME DEPT SOC-SEC-NUM CHECKBOOK/ACCT GROSS PAY DEDUCTIONS NET PAY 5 1990 ALBERG, JOHN FIR 477-B0-8fA3 681. 63 111.88 56'3.75 5t 1'380 AMACHER, JEFFREY FIR 468-80-7241 510.00 83.40 426.60 5055 1201 BANGERT, RICHARD M FIR 476-64-2483 1,50'3.25 227.00 1,282.25 5056 1203 BARNARD, RICHARD K FIR 473-72-9232 294.50 48.27 246.23 5057 1208 BEHR, SCOTT A FIR 46'3-72-0'333 282.63 46. 10 236.53 5058 1230 BOGENREIF, KERRY FIR 471-80-163'3 570.00 '34.27 475.73 505'3 2857 BOLDT, ROBERT FIR 38'3-86-2857 468. 75 75.80 392.95 5060 1260 BROKER, MICHAEL A FIR 474-76-705'3 161. 50 26.34 135. 16 5061 1265 BRUDER, DAVE FIR 470-70-5771 1,175.38 1'34.04 981. 34 5062 1340 CHEVALLIER, THIERRY B FIR 475-17-2607 340.00 55.93 284.07 5063 1350 CISEWSKI, JERRY L FIR 472-64-5874 635.63 %.00 53'3.63 5064 1380 COLVARD, BRIAN T FIR 471-'36-0694 308. 13 51.47 256.66 5065 5'366 COOPER, DARYL FIR 46'3-'30-5%6 399.38 65. 79 333.59 5066 1390 CRUZ, RAYMOND FIR 563-2'3-3'361 337.25 55.89 281. 36 5067 1400 DOMITZ, STUART C FIR 45'3-84-2206 399.00 65. 79 333.21 5068 1500 ENGLUND, DESMOND W FIR 477-42-5'3'34 346.88 53.00 293.88 5069 1600 FRENCH, TOM FIR 472-80-5434 888.25 146.88 741. 37 5070 1740 GARDNER, TODD FIR 474-94-7433 760.00 125.02 634.98 5071 1'350 IWAN, CHRISTOPHER E FIR 468-68-118'3 313.50 71. 55 241. 95 5072 2140 KERFELD, GLENN FIR 477-64-8989 395.63 60.00 335.63 5073 2222 LALLIER, DANIEL FIR 476-90-0461 538.13 B8.80 449.33 5074 2210 LAUDERBAUGH, RANDY D FIR 474-80-1592 1,127.88 170.00 957. 8,~, 5075 2250 LEE, STEVE FIR 473-60-9468 454. 75 68.00 386.75 5076 2340 MENCH, MIKE J FIR 469-58-7387 676.88 10"2.00 574.88 5077 2360 MISCHKE, KATHY FIR 470-Bf,-7273 1,256.13 207.21 1,048.92 5070 5555 MISCHKE, SCOTT FIR 472-17-5516 631. 88 104.16 527.72 CO" 2365 MISCHKE, THOMAS G FIR 474-80-2905 1,340.63 220.44 1,120.19 . 5l,u<! 2375 MOE, DON FIR 473-66-0727 246.50 41. 57 204.93 5081 2380 MOHLER, ARTHUR E FIR 473-70-2821 1,202.25 180.00 1,022.25 5082 8029 NADEAU, SCOTT FIR 472-86-8029 374.00 61. 42 312.58 5083 2440 NORBERG, DEWAYNE C FIR 471-70-6197 348. 75 58.06 290.69 5084 2550 OLSON, GLEN A FIR 476-64-5300 996.25 1513.00 846.25 51385 2630 PETERSON, JERRY FIR 5133-40-0991 j7j. b 56.00 317.13 5086 2640 PETERSON, MIKE T FIR 476-76-6201 8913.38 134.130 756.38 5087 2730 REITER, RONALD FIR 475-7f,-8397 352.75 58.11 294.64 5088 27513 ROBERTSON, GORDON C FIR 470-68-31133 316.BB 52.59 264.29 5089 2770 ROLSTAD, RANDY T FIR 474-76-4827 1,001. 88 150.00 851. 88 5090 2810 SCOTT, JAMES L FIR 337-54-1513 857.38 141. 43 715.95 5091 2820 SHIKOWSKY, STEVE FIR 473-50-'3871 561. 00 84.00 477. 00 5092 2825 STAFKI, ROBERT FIR 471-713-5084 563.13 92.17 470.% 5093 0953 STAHNKE, JUSTIN FIR 471-88-0953 341. 25 55.95 285.30 51394 2830 STARK, MARC FIR 3&8-78-2259 624.63 1132.136 522.57 5095 2860 STEWART, KEVIN J FIR 475-92- 3"272 1,211.130 199.56 1,011.44 50% 2880 SWEENEY, TERRANCE H FIR 3%-50-2400 j6j.j8 59.27 3134. 11 5097 29213 TASCHUK, ALLEN S FIR 470-78-1317 249.38 41.62 2137.76 5098 2'340 THELL, PAUL FIR 470-80-9566 238.013 39.45 198.55 5099 2945 THELL, TIM FIR 4713-80-8515 5131. 50 82.27 419.23 ---------------- -------------- ---------------- ---------------- -------------- ---------------- TOTALS $28,416.99 $4,554.56 $23,862.43 PA SUMMARY FICA Social Secul'i t y FICA Medical'e cllj Bonestroo _ _ Rosene ~ Anderlil< & . \J . Associates Engineers & Architects Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Assoc;ates, Inc. ;s an AffirmatJve Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo, PE. . Marvin L. Sorvala, P.E. . Glenn R. Cook, P.E. .. Robert G. Schunicht. PE. . Jerry A Bourdon, P.E Senior Consultants: Robert W. Rosene, EE. . Joseph C AnderJik, PE. . Richard E. Turner, P.E. . Susan M. Eberlin, CPA Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford, P.E. . Keith A. Gordon, PE. . Robert R. PfeFferle, PE. II Richard W. Foster, f'E. . David O. loskota, f'E. . Robert C. Russek, AI.A. . Mark A Hanson, f'E. . Michael T. Rautmann, P.E. . T.ed KField, PE. . Kenneth f' Anderson. P.E . Mark R. Rolfs, f'E. . David A Bonestroo, MB.A . Sidney f' Williamson, PE.. loS. . Agnes M. Ring, M.B.A. . Allan Rick Schm,dt, PE Offices: St. Paul, Sr. Cloud, Rochester and Willmar, MN . Milwaukee, Wl Website: www.bonesrroQ.com September 7,2000 Mr. James March City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerviile, MN 55038 RE: Hunters Crossing Cente~ville, MinIlesota File No. 616-00-114 Dear Mr. March: Enclosed, please find four (4) copies of Pay Request No.1 for the above referenced project. The site grading improvements have been completed by North Pine Aggregate. The sanitary sev,cc ili"1d water main have been installed by Northdale Construction, along Centerville Road and t:truugh out the development. We recommend a partial payment of $184,945.15 to Northdale Constmction Company. Please sign all four copies and retum the one stamped "engineer's Copy" to our offic~. Coni.act L't<': at (65 I) 604-4g08 if you have any questions or comments. (~jncerely, BONESTROO, ROSENE,ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES IJ~~~N/~ Daniel S. Schluender ;::c: Fi,c1osure 2335 West Highway 36 . St. Paul, MN 55113. 651-636-4600 · Fax: 651-636-1311 ENGINEER'S COpy n Bonestroo eo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects Owner: City of Centerville, 1880 Main St., Centerville, MN 55038 Date: September 5, 2000 For Period: 7/27/2000 to 9/5/2000 Request No: 1 Contractor: Northdale Construction Co. Inc., 14450 Northdale Blvd., Roaers, MN 55374 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT HUNTERS CROSSING BRA FILE NO. 616-00-114 SUMMARY 1 Original Contract Amount $ 502,779.56 2 Change Order - Addition $ 0.00 3 Change Order - Deduction $ 0.00 4 Revised Contract Amount $ 502,779.56 5 Value Completed to Date $ 194,679.11 6 Material on Hand $ 0.00 7 Amount Earned $ 194,679.11 8 Less Retainage 5% $ 9,733.96 9 Subtotal $ 184,945.15 10 Less Amount Paid Previously $ 0.00 11 Liquidated damages - $ 0.00 12 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. $ 184,945.15 Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLlK & ASSOCIATES, INC. I~/() 0JfJA,~ Approved by Owner: CITY OF CENTERVILLE Specified Contract Completion Date: c1:\l[~001 ,]-l-\.V\e. 24 Date: Request 111 Contract Unit Quantity Amount No. Item Unit Quantity Price to Date to Date Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer - Centerville Road 1 Mobilization LS 1 13500.00 0.5 $6,750.00 2 Traffic control LS 1 2912.00 0.3 $873.60 3 Shouldering aggregate TN 50 24.45 $0.00 4 Clear and Grub Tree 2 500.00 2 $1,000.00 5 Silt fence, regular LF 200 2.00 $0.00 6 Remove and replace 36" CMP LS 1 1500.00 $1,500.00 7 Salvage and replace gravel driveway TN 20 17.07 $0.00 8 Connect to existing manhole EA 1 1500.00 1 $1,500.00 9 12" PVC, SDR 35, 8'- 10' deep LF 250 28.09 250 $7,022.50 10 12" PVC, SDR 35,10'-12' deep LF 175 28.09 175 $4,915.75 11 12" PVC, SDR 35,12'- 14' deep LF 10 28.09 10 $280.90 12 12" PVC, SDR 35,14'-16' deep LF 265 28.09 265 $7,443.85 13 12" PVC, SDR 26, 16'- 18' deep LF 5 30.54 5 $152.70 14 12" PVC, SDR 26,18' - 20' deep LF . 15 30.54 15 $458.10 15 4' dia. sanitary manhole EA 1 1394.73 1 $1,394.73 16 Manhole overdepth LF 3 99.97 3 $299.91 17 Adjust MH frame and ring casting EA 1 150.00 $0.00 18 Remove bituminous street SY 330 2.00 250 $500.00 19 Patch bituminous street SY 330 15.92 $0.00 20 Salvage and reinstall 12" CMP culvert LF 40 16.67 40 $666.80 21 Improved pipe foundation LF 720 0.01 $0.00 22 Fiber blanket on steep slopes SY 600 2.08 $0.00 23 Seeding with topsoil and mulch AC 0.75 998.40 $0.00 Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer - Centerville Road $34,758.84 Part 2 - Water Main - Centerville Road 24 Connect to existing 12" water main EA 1 750.00 1 $750.00 25 12" PVC, C900 LF 1062 23.86 1062 $25,339.32 26 8" PVC, C900 LF 35 16.71 35 $584.85 27 6" PVC, C900 LF 50 14.24 50 $712.00 28 8" gate valve and box EA 1 652.74 1 $652.74 29 12" butterfly valve and box EA 3 851.33 3 $2,553.99 30 Hydrant with gate valve and box EA 3 1899.17 3 $5,697.51 31 Valve rod extension EA 7 143.49 $0.00 32 Fittings LB 3000 1.15 2000 $2,300.00 33 Improved pipe foundation LF 1100 0.01 $0.00 34 Sodding SY 700 2.55 $0.00 35 12" pipe restraint EA 20 69.64 20 $1,392.80 36 8" pipe restraint EA 4 39.85 4 $159.40 37 Seeding with topsoil and mulch AC 0.25 1018.64 $0.00 Total Part 2. Water Main - Centerville Road $40,142.61 Part 3 - Services - Centerville Road 38 12" x 6" PVC wye EA 2 236.27 2 $472.54 39 12" x 4" PVC wye EA 2 229.88 2 $459.76 40 4" PVC, Schedule 40 service pipe LF 40 11.22 $0.00 41 6" HDPE sewer service directional drill LF 156 42.02 $0.00 42 4" PVC, Schedule 40 riser pipe LF 10 17.47 10 $174.70 43 1" copper water service LF 90 8.59 $0.00 44 1" copper service directional drill LF 400 9.39 $0.00 45 Reconnect water service EA 1 178.76 $0.00 46 Connect to existing sewer service EA 1 178.76 $0.00 47 1" curb stop and box EA 6 132.51 $0.00 48 1" corporation stop EA 7 143.16 $0.00 Total Part 3 - Services - Centerville Road $1,107.00 Part 4 - Sanitary Sewer - Hunters Crossing 49 8" PVC, SDR 35, 18'- 20' deep - jacked LF 60 246.99 60 $14,819.40 50 8" PVC, SDR 35,8'.10' deep LF 350 16.25 350 $5,687.50 51 8" PVC, SDR 35,10'- 12' deep LF 900 18.37 900 $16,533.00 52 8" PVC, SDR 35, 12'_ 14' deep LF 300 18.37 300 $5,511.00 53 8" PVC, SDR 35, 14'- 16' deep LF 500 20.14 493 $9,929.02 54 4' diameter sanitary manhole EA 9 1362.87 10 $13,628.70 55 Manhole overdepth LF 56 99.97 50 $4,998.50 Request #1 Contract Unit Quantity Amount No. Item Unit Quantity Price to Date to Date 56 Improved pipe foundation LF 2000 0.01 $0.00 Total Part 4 - Sanitary Sewer - Hunters Crossing $71,107.12 Part 5 - Water Main - Hunters Crossing 57 8" PVC, C900 - jacked LF 45 143.24 45 $6,445.80 58 8" PVC, C900 LF 1330 14.05 1310 $18,405.50 59 6" PVC, C900 LF 810 11.58 481 $5,569.98 60 6" gate valve and box EA 2 490.86 2 $981.72 61 8" gate valve and box EA 4 652.74 4 $2,610.96 62 Hydrant with gate valve and box EA 6 1899.17 3 $5,697.51 63 Valve rod extension EA 12 98.49 $0:00 64 Gate valve wrench, 8' long EA 1 39.08 $0.00 65 Gate valve wrench, 3' long EA 2 23.11 $0.00 66 Hydrant wrench EA 3 29.50 $0.00 67 Fittings LB 3000 1.30 2000 $2,600.00 68 Improved pipe foundation LF 1000 0.01 $0.00 69 8" pipe restraint EA 24 39.82 18 $716.76 70 6" pipe restraint EA 16 30.24 10 $302.40 71 Insulation, 2" thick SY 20 17.46 $0.00 Total Part 5 - Water Main - Hunters Crossing $43,330.63 Part 6 - Services - Hunters Crossing 72 8" x 4" PVC wye EA 37 76.63 37 $2,835.31 73 4" PVC sewer service LF 1710 6.64 $0.00 74 4" PVC riser pipe LF 90 17.47 80 $1,397.60 75 1" copper water service LF 1730 5.76 $0.00 76 1" curb stop and box EA 37 107.51 $0.00 77 1" corporation stop EA 37 67.05 $0.00 78 Curb box wrench EA 3 34.82 $0.00 Total Part 6 - Services - Hunters Crossing $4,232.91 Part 7 . Storm Sewer - Hunters Crossing 79 12" HOPE LF 330 17.51 $0.00 80 12" RCP, Class 5 LF 120 20.77 $0.00 81 15" RCP, Class 5 LF 80 22.14 $0.00 82 18" HOPE LF 215 22.91 $0.00 83 18" RCP, Class 5 LF 210 24.16 $0.00 84 Improved pipe foundation LF 500 0.01 $0.00 85 Catch basin EA 4 942.19 $0.00 86 Catch basin manhole EA 4 1371.39 $0.00 87 Pond outlet structure EA 1 1898.07 $0.00 88 12" RCP apron w/trash guard EA 1 534.52 $0.00 89 12" HOPE apron w/trash guard EA 1 254.43 $0.00 90 18" RCP apron w/trash guard EA 1 649.81 $0.00 91 18" HOPE apron w/trash guard EA 2 306.63 $0.00 92 Rock riprap, Class 3 CY 25 65.00 $0.00 93 Sodding SY 500 2.55 $0.00 Total Part 7 - Stonn Sewer - Hunters Crossing $0.00 Part 8 - Street - Hunters Crossing 94 Mill bituminous strip LF 100 3.12 $0.00 95 Subgrade preparation RO STA 24 125.00 $0.00 96 Granular borrow (CV) CY 5000 9.71 $0.00 97 Aggregate base, Class 5 - streets TN 3300 9.30 $0.00 98 Aggregate base, Class 5 - trail TN 700 9.82 $0.00 99 Type 31 B bituminous base course TN 700 27.51 $0.00 100 Type 41 B bituminous wear course - streets TN 700 29.64 $0.00 101 Type 41A bituminous wear - trail TN 185 38.48 $0.00 102 Bituminous material for tack coat GAL 400 1.30 $0.00 103 Surmountable concrete curb and gutter LF 4400 6.66 $0.00 . 104 Barricade EA 2 234.00 $0.00 105 4" drain tile LF 4260 3.42 $0.00 106 Geotextile fabric SY 9000 1.35 $0.00 107 Seeding with topsoil and mulch AC 1.5 998.40 $0.00 Total Part 8 - Street - Hunters Crossing $0.00 Request # 1 No. Item Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer - Centerville Road Total Part 2 - Water Main - Centerville Road Total Part 3 - Services - Centerville Road Total Part 4 - Sanitary Sewer - Hunters Crossing Total Part 5 - Water Main - Hunters Crossing Total Part 6 - Services - Hunters Crossing Total Part 7 - Storm Sewer - Hunters Crossing Total Part 8 - Street - Hunters Crossing Total Work Completed To Date Request #1 Unit Contract Quantity Unit Price Quantity to Date Amount to Date $34,758.84 $40,142.61 $1,107.00 $71,107.12 $43,330.63 $4,232.91 $0.00 $0.00 $194,679.11 PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER CITY OF CENTERVILLE BRA FILE NO. 616-00-114 CONTRACTOR NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO INC CHANGE ORDERS No. Date Description Amount Total Change Orders PAYMENT SUMMARY No. From 07/27/2000 To 09/05/00 Payment 184,945.15 Retainage 9,733.96 Completed 194,679.11 Material on Hand Total Payment to Date $184,945.15 OriQinal Contract $502,779.56 Retainaqe Pay No. 1 9,733.96 Chanqe Orders Total Amount Earned $194,679.11 Revised Contract $502,779.56 Request #1 MEMO DATE: September 8, 2000 TO Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE : Resolution #00-17, Resolution #00-20 (Hunter's Crossing) ............................................................................ Included in your packet is Resolution #00-17. This resolution calls for the issuance and , rrt-,~^ AAn' _ _ 1 1'" , 11 1 ("""r'lf'lr\ --r1_o '. ._ ._ :'''111;,; Vi J>V.JV,VVV ill bCU~l"U VUill:;d.l1VH J.lHjJ1V\'-Ul'-Ul UVl1U:' Vl ~VVV. J.1U'> 1l'-111 ''''1'> previously adopted, but is being adopted again to reflect the revised bond opening date. Also included in your packet is Resolution #00-20. This resolution authorizes an assessment hearing to be held on September 27th, At that meeting, Council will formally adopt the assessment role for Hunter's Crossing. 1:sta6(ished 1857 1880 I}v[ain Street . Centervi[[e, 1}v['lI[ 55038 (651) 429-3232 . 'Jm( (651) 429.8629 Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota, was held at the City Hall in the City on Wednesday, September 13,2000, commencing at 6:00 o'clock P.M. The following members of the Council were present: and the following were absent: * * * * * * * * * The following resolution was presented by Councilmember its adoption: . who moved RESOLUTION #00-17 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $650,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 2000 BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota (City) as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that: (a) the following assessable public improvements (the Improvements) have been made, duly ordered or contracts let for the construction thereof, by the City pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 (Act); Proiect Designation & Description: Hunters Crossing Improvements Construction Costs Contingencies and Engineering Subtotal Costs ofIssuance Less: Est. Const. Fund Inv. Income Subtotal Rounding Factor Total Issue Total Proiect Cost $502,780.00 120.667.20 $623,447.20 23,929.38 (1.108.35) $649,568.23 431.78 $650,000.00 (b) it is necessary and expedient to the sound [mancial management of the affairs of the City to issue $650,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 2000 (Bonds) pursuant to the Act to provide financing for the Improvements. 2. To provide financing for the Improvements, the City will issue and sell Bonds in the amount of $640,250. To provide in part the additional interest required to market the Bonds at this time, additional Bonds will be issued in the amount of$9,750. The excess of the purchase price of the Bonds over the sum of $640,250 will be credited to the debt service fund for the Bonds for the purpose of paying interest first coming due on the additional Bonds. The Bonds will be issued, sold and delivered in accordance with the terms of the following Terms of Proposal: TERMS OF PROPOSAL $650,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of2000 City of Centerville Anoka County, Minnesota (BOOK ENTRY ONLY) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN sealed proposals for the purchase of the above bonds will be received until 11 :00 o'clock A.M., C.T. on Wednesday, October 25, 2000, in the offices of Juran & Moody, a Division of Miller, Johnson & Kuehn, Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota, at which time the proposals will be opened and tabulated for consideration by the City Council at a meeting at 6:00 o'clock P.M. on the same day. The bonds are offered on the following terms. Purpose and Security The purpose of the bonds is to provide funds for the financing of assessable public improvements in the City. The bonds will be general obligations of the City, for which its full faith, credit and taxing powers are pledged together with special assessments against benefited properties. Details of the Bonds The bonds will be issued in fully registered form, will be dated November I, 2000, will be in denominations of integral multiples of $5,000 each and will mature on February 1, in the 'TP<)""C" .",~ ",..,..,Al1nt(' ~(' frdl("'\,,'1.(:," Year Amount Year Amount 2002 $175,000 2007 $10,000 2003 175,000 2008 15,000 2004 200,000 2009 15,000 -'00'\ 10000 2010 20.000 2006 10,000 2011 20,000 Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for any combination of serial bonds and term bonds, subject to mandatory redemption, so long as the amounts of principal maturing or subject to mandatory redemption in each year conforms to the maturity schedule set forth above. Book Entry System The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond, representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ("DTCfI), New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its participants. Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC will be the responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to deposit the Bonds with DTC. Optional Redemption The City may elect on February 1, 2006, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option ofthe City and in such manner as the City will determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. Mandatory Redemption Any term bonds issued will be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption in part prior to their scheduled maturity dates on February 1 of certain years, as more fully described in the Details of the Bonds section herein, at a price of par plus accrued interest to the date of It;;ut:mption. T Y'\+n....0.,-.+- .lUl\",l\",..)l T..,t"''''(1IC''+ "'.., t-hr> ~/"1o?""tr1(' ".;11 hC\ 't"'\r"}.p..,hl" ("'\" T~"':'.Ioh1"'ll""""" 1 ,.,n()1 ~nrl 0~".,;.,"nl1..1h.~ th(",..",.,-A-0.... 0,., . . each February 1 and August 1. Bonds maturing on the same date must bear interest from date of issue until paid at a single, uniform rate, not exceeding the rate specified for bonds of any subsequent maturity. Each rate must be in an integral multiple of 1/20 or 1/8 of 1%. Interest _ _ ~ 11 L . _ _ , 1 _ _ .... 1 ~ _ L _, r_ ~ . ,r., "" F" ,J _, _ . _"._ ~ [' 4 .. _ 1_ ~ "') f\ .-1.... ~, ~......... r'" ~....... 1.... r- H.l.U 1J\w. \"'V,U..J..i-"UL>WU UH l.11lro.. uu..:Jol':> Ul u --,VV-UU.) )\"..Ul VllH\,.,l\\"- .JV-UU) l1.lVHllL'::>. Registrar The City will name the Registrar which will be subject to applicable SEC regulations. Principal will be payable at the principal office of the Registrar and interest will be payable by check or draft of the Registrar mailed to the registered holder of a bond. The City will pay the reasonable and customary charges for the services of the Registrar. CUSIP Numbers The City assumes no obligation for the assignment or printing of CUSIP numbers on the bonds or for the correctness of any numbers printed thereon, but will permit such numbers to be assigned and printed at the expense of the purchaser, if the purchaser waives any extension of the time of delivery caused thereby. A ward The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non-substantive informalities of any proposal or of matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals without cause, and, (iii) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein. Delivery Within 40 days after sale, the City will furnish and deliver to the office of the purchaser or, at its option, will deposit with a bank in the United States selected by it and approved by the City as its agent to permit examination by and to deliver to the purchaser, the printed and executed bonds, lhe unqualified opinion thereon of bond counsel, and a certificate stating that no litigation in any manner questioning their validity is then threatened or pending. The charge of the delivery agent must be paid by the purchaser but all other costs will be paid by the City. The purchase price must be paid upon delivery of the bonds in funds available for expenditure by the City on the day of payment. Legal Opinion An unqualified legal oplllion on the bonds will be furnished by Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, Minneapolis, Minnesota. The legal opinion will be printed on the bonds at the request of lhe purchaser. The legal opinion will SlaIe lhal the bonds are valid and binding general obligations of the City payable primarily from special assessments against benefited properties and that the City is required by law to levy taxes for the principal and interest thereon as the same become due without limit as to rate or amount. Bond Insurance at Purchaser's Option If the Bonds qualifY for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment therefor at the option of the bidder, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the issuance of any such commitment will be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of insurance will be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay the rating fee. Any other rating agency fees will be the responsibility of the purchaser. Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the purchaser will not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on the Bonds. Official Statement The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly-final Official Statement as required by Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifYing the interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other information required by law, will constitute a Final Official Statement of the City with respect to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2-12. By awarding the Bonds to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting an official Proposal Form therefor, the City agrees that, no more than seven business days after the date of such award, it will provide without cost to the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 25 copies of the Official Statement and the addenda described above. The City designates the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter. Any underwriter executing and delivering an Official Proposal Form with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it will accept such designation and (ii) it will enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring the receipt hy each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement. Continuing Disclosure Participating underwriters need not comply with the continuing disclosure requirements of Rule 15c2-12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Rule"), because the offering is in a principal amount less than $1,000,000. Consequently, the City will not enter into any undertaking to provide continuing disclosure of any kind with respect to the Bonds. Type of Proposal- Amount A sealed proposal will be for not less than $640,250 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the Bonds. Proposals will be accompanied by a good Faith Deposit ("Deposit") in the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $13,000, payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany each proposal. If a Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to Juran & Moody, a Division of Miller, Johnson & Kuehn, Inc., prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must identifY each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is required to submit its Deposit to Juran & Moody, a Division of Miller, Johnson & Kuehn, Inc., in the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire transfer as instructed by Juran & Moody, a Division of Miller, Johnson & Kuehn, Inc., not later than 3:30 P.M., Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement. The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the . meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates will be in integral multiples of 5/l 00 or 1/8 of 1 %. Bonds of the same maturity will bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be accepted. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Jim March City Administrator Dated: September 13,2000. 3. Juran & Moody, a Division of Miller, Johnson & Kuehn, Inc. is authorized and directed to negotiate the Bonds in accordance with the foregoing Terms of ProposaL The City Council will meet at 6:00 o'clock P.M. on Wednesday, October 25, 2000, to consider proposals , . ......... ~,. <..',' '_..._~,....f;,........-.......:+}......rt""""Arott thnUAV'\rtr on Lnt: bonus anu LaKt ally UlU,-l Ui-'jJ1VtI11ul,- ",-l1Vll ..nu ,...>1-'...., 0 '''' LlVllU'>. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by , and upon vote being taken thereon the following members Councilmember voted in favor of the motion: and the following voted against: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTYOFANOKA ) } CITY OF CENTERVILLE ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Administrator of the City of Centerville, Minnesota, hereby certifY that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held on Wednesday, September 13, 2000, with the original minutes on file in my office and the extract is a full, true and correct copy of the minutes, insofar as they relate to the issuance and sale of $650,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of2000 of the City. WITNESS My hand as City Administrator and the corporate seal of the City this _ day of ,2000. City Administrator City of Centerville, Minnesota (SEAL) ~ta[lished 1857 EXHIBIT J 1880 Main Street . Centervi({c, M'J{ S5038 (651) 429-3232 . :Ja;r (6S1) 429-8629 Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota, was held at the City Hall in the City on Wednesday, September 13, 2000, commencing at 6:00 o'clock P.M. The following members of the Council were present: and the following were absent: * * * * * * * * * The following resolution was presented by Councilmember moved its adoption: , who RESOLUTION #00-20 RESOLUTION CALLING HEARING ON ASSESSMENTS FOR THE HUNTER'S CROSSING STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS OF 2000 WHEREAS, The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City consulting engineer, has prepared an assessment roll for the Hunter's Crossing improvements, and said proposed assessment roll is on file with the City Clerk and open to public inspection; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Clerk shall publish notice that this Council will meet to consider the proposed assessments on September 13,2000, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of said City of Centerville, Minnesota. The published notice shall be in substantially the form set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto. . . 2. A copy of the notice in substantially the form set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto shall be mailed to the owners of each parcel of property described in the assessment roll. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this 13 th day of September, 2000. Mayor ATTEST: Jim March, City Administrator tervi[[e 'Estab{isned 1857 1880 Main Street . Centervi[[c, MY{ 55038 (651) 429-3232 . 'Jmc (651) 429-862_9 ST ATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENTS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota will meet on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street, in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed assessment for the utility and street improvements within the plat known as Hunter's Crossing and along a portion of Centerville Road. Adoption by the council of the proposed assessment may occur at the hearing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed: Hunter's Crossing Plat PID # ADDRESS R23-31-22-32-0021 6953 Centervllle Road KLJ-J i-LL-JL-VVV) R23-31-22-32-0004 R23-31-22-32-0002 & R23-31-22-32-0019 R23-31-22-32-00 18 R23-31-22-32-00 13 R23-31-22-43-0001 R23-31-22-34-0002 R26-31-22-12-0005 U::J'-t.) LemerVlHe Kuau 6939 Centerville Road 6907 LaMotte Drive (Laurie LaMotte Park) 6925 Centerville Road 6903 Centerville Road Country Ridge 6892 Centerville Road 6756 Centerville Road (Hunter's Crossing) The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's Office. The improvement project was considered at a hearing on May 10, 2000. The total estimated project cost is $650,000. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $622,495 of which $57 1,053.10 is proposed to be assessed against the Hunter's Crossing Plat and $52,441.90 is proposed to be assessed against the other parcels. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of the assessment unless a signed, written objection signed by the property owner is filed with the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Centerville within thirty (30) days after the adoption of the assessment and filings such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or City Clerk. The City Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assisted devices or a sign language interpreter must be received before 4:00 p.rn. September 22, 2000. All persons interested are invited to attend and to be heard, orally or in writing. You may call City Hall (651) 429-3232 if you have any questions. September 7, 2000 /5/ Teresa Bender, ClerkfTreasurer abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz Published in the Quad Communily Press September 12,2000 and September 1 Y, .LUUU 1:sta6[ished 1857 1880 ~{aitl Street . (entervi[[c, M1{ 550J8 (651) 429.3232 . 'TalL (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENTS Mr. & Mrs. Robert Barett 6953 Centerville Road Centerville, MN 55038 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota will meet on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street, in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider. and possibly adopt. the proposed assessment for the utility and street improvements within the plat known as Hunter's Crossing and along . " .. 1 . 1 1 "' r./l ~ ,1 ,....__,_ ...r-'-......... ........+ .......-.r'\'l. "ro""~' nf -tl",,,, U. }JUlL1Vl1 Vi \.....~l.tl......l\lH..... .l\..V~U. ~~u.v.t-'~J.uJ.J. LJ) 1..1.1....... ......v.......J._...~ .../.. ...<~- t-"'..vr-..j..,_...... .._~'-.....kJ_...__._ ~.-""r hearing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed: HUNTER'S CROSSING PLAT 1'lU IT t-LJ..JUi'-LJ0 R23-31-22-32-0018 R23-31-22-32-00 13 R23-31-22-43-0001 R23-31-22-34-0002 R26-31-22-12-0005 6953 Centerville Road 6945 Centerville Road 6939 Centerville Road 6907 LaMotte Drive (Laurie LaMotte Park) 6925 Centerville Road 6903 CenterviIJe Road Country Ridge 6892 Centerville Road 6756 Centerville Road (Hunter"s Crossing) R23-31-22-32-0021 R23-31-22-32-0005 R23-31-22-32-0004 R23-31-22-32-0002 & R23-31-22-32-00 19 The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is $0. Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday of January 2001 and will bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment . resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the assessment resolution under December 31, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk/Treasurer. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City ClerkfTreasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the rate of interest that will apply is eight percent (8%) per year. The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $622,495. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be as follows: 1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by 11&ri&tivc or by examiIlation, and by the L'1troduction of exJ;.ibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. 2. Arter the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call WItnesses or present SUdl testimony a~ the oDjecLOr desires. The same procedurt: for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's \^J lLne~~e~. 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the council. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape-recorded (video-taped). 6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. 7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing. An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within thirty (30) after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. L__- ~~:J~~~ City Clerk Tsta6{isfied 1857 1880 Main 5treet . Centcrvif(e, M'J{ 55038 (651) 429-3232 . ~ra;c (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENTS Mr. & Mrs. Bernard Henrich 6945 Centerville Road Centerville, MN 55038 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota will meet on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street, in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider. and possibly adopt. the proposed assessment for the utility and street improvements within the plat known as Hunter's Crossing and along a portion of CentervilIe Road. Adoption bv the council of the proposed assessment mav occur at the hearing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed: HUNTER'S CROSSING PLAT PID # ADDRESS R23-31-22-32-0021 R23-31-22-l'J-0005 R23-31-22-32-0004 R23-3 I -22-32-0002 & R23-31-22-32-001 9 6953 Centerville Road 6945 CenterviIIe Road 6939 Centerville Road 6907 LaMotte Drive (laurie T ,," f '''+-+- '" 0,........1." Lo.nlVll~ 1 uJ..C\.) R23-31-22-32-00 18 R23-31-22-32-00 13 R23-31-22-43-000 1 R23-31-22-34-0002 R26-31-22-] 2-0005 6925 CentervilIe Road 6903 Centerville Road Country Ridge 6892 CentervilIe Road 6756 Centerville Road (Hunter's Crossing) The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is $2,640.60. Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the fIrst Monday of January 200 I and will bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the assessment resolution under December 31, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. ~ You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk/Treasurer. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk/Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the rate of interest that will apply is eight percent (8%) per year. TIle Vlup0~~J u..)J.....j..:J:-,l~~~-'": ~'v~: ;.) viI ~1~ [0i' ft~~~~~ i1~.)~~~~i0n at the City Clerk's office. The total alTIOunt of the proposed assessment is $622,495. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may he taken H<; to the amount of ;;m assessment unless a signed. written ohjection is filed with the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be as follows: 1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testifY by narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. 2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or fJJ. ......).....1..11.. ..J\...o.Ito...l.J. ..........Jl.J..J..J..LV.l..l.) L4..,) '".I........ vUJ~""''''VJ. .....O...J.o\....>., J. J.J...... ....h.....J.J.J.1to.. }JJ. v...............UJ..... ..LVi questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's witn~sses. 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the council. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape-recorded (video-taped). 6. At the c1os~ of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a [mal presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. 7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing. An O\V11er may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within thirty (30) after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. c .~~~~) ~$> City Clerk 1880 ']v{ain 5treet . CCllterviflc, ~N{ 55038 (651) 429-3232 . :fa;c (651) 429-8629 ST ATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENTS Mr. & Mrs. Dale Greenwaldt 6937 Centerville Road Centerville, MN 55038 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota will meet on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street, in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed assessment for the utility and street improvements within the plat known as Hunter's Crossing and along a portion of Centerville Road. Adoption by the council of the proposed assessment may occur at the hearing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed: HUNTER'S CROSSING PLAT PID # ADDRESS R23-31-22-32-00 18 R23-31-22-32-00 13 R23-31-22-43-0001 R23-3 I -22-34-0002 R26-31-22-12-0005 6953 Centerville Road 6945 Centerville Road 6939 Centerville Road 6907 LaMotte Drive (Laurie LaMotte Park) 6925 Centerville Road 6903 Centerville Road Country Ridge 6892 Centerville Road 6756 Centerville Road (Hunter's Crossing) R23-31-22-32-0021 R23-31-22-32-0005 R23-31-22-32-0004 R23-31-22-32-0002 & R23-31-22-32-00 19 The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is $2,640.60. Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday of January 2001 and will bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the lssessment resolution under December 31, 200 I. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. . " ~ You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk/Treasurer. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City ClerklT reasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the rate of interest that will apply is eight percent (8%) per year. The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $622,495. Written or ural objections \vill be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed \Vith the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be as follows: 1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testifY by narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. 1... AiLer lhe Cily has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's v,ltncsses. 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the council. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape-recorded (video-taped). 6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. 7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing. An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within thirty (30) after the adoption of the assessment and fIling such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. . / .J ~_- ~~_~04~~ 0~F1~ City Clerk 'Esta6{isned 1857 1880 I}.{ain Street . (cntervi((c, I}.{'J{ 55038 (651) 429.3232 . 'fa:c (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENTS City of Centerville 6907 LaMotte Drive (Laurie LaMotte Park) Centerville, MN 55038 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota will meet on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street, in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed assessment for the utility and street improvements within the plat known as Hunter's Crossing and along a portion of Centerville Road. Adoption by the council of the proposed assessment may occur at the hearing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed: HUNTER'S CROSSING PLAT nTl> 1.1 ^l\nnrC'c: R23-31-22-32-00 18 R23-31-22-32-00 13 R23-31-22-43-0001 R23-31-22-34-0002 R26-31-22-12-0005 6953 Centerville Road 6945 Centerville Road 6939 Centerville Road 6907 LaMotte Drive (Laurie LaMotte Park) 6925 Centerville Road 6903 Centerville Road Country Ridge 6892 Centerville Road 6756 Centerville Road (Hunter's Crossing) R23-31-22-32-0021 R23-31-22-32-0005 R23-31-22-32-0004 R23-31-22-32-0002 & R23-31-22-32-0019 The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is $3,074. Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the fIrst Monday of January 2001 and will bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the assessment resolution under December 3 I, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. . ~ 1 You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk/Treasurer. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk/Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the rate of interest that will apply is eight percent (8%) per year. The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $622,495. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be as tollows: 1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testifY by narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. 2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for questlOnmg ot the Cny s wItnesses WIll be lo11owea wan the objector s ,. .;t1"'\ <"("'("'['''' "iLii..........-.I.....-... 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the council. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape-recorded (video-taped). 6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be oresented at this ooint. 7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing. An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within thirty (30) after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. (~/ ..:J~ ., // ~ / ~.<1 . P./c... City Clerk 'Esta6[isfiea 1857 1880 Main 5trect . Centervi[fe, 9v['}.[ 55038 (651) 429-3232 . 'Ta;", (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENTS Mr. & Mrs. Larry Woiak 6925 Centerville Road CenterviJle, MN 55038 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota will meet on \Vednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, ] 880 Main Street, in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed assessment for the utility and street improvements within the plat known as Hunter's Crossing and along a portion of Centerville Road. Adoption by the council of the proposed assessment may occur at the hearing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed: HUNTER"S CROSSING PLAT R23-31-22-32-0021 R23-31-22-32-0005 R23-31-22-32-0004 R23-31-22-32-0002 & R23-31-22-32-0019 6953 Centerville Road 6945 Centerville Road 6939 Centerville Road 6907 LaMotte Drive (Laurie LaMotte Park) 6925 Centervlile Koad 6903 Centerville Road Country Ridge 6892 Centerville Road 6756 Centerville Road (Hunter's Crossing) .K23-31-22-32-UU 1 ~ R23-31-22-32-00 13 R23-31-22-43-000 I R23-31-22-34-0002 R26-31-22-12-0005 The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is $7,382.70. Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday of January 2001 and will bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the assessment resolution under December 31, 200 1. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. , (' . You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk/Treasurer. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk/Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the rate of interest that will apply is eight percent (8%) per year. The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $622,495. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be as [ol1o'.\"s: I. The City will present its case fIrst by calling witnesses who may testifY by narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testilied, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. 2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or nresent such testimony as the ohiector desires. The same nrocedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's witnesses. 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the council. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape-recorded (video-taped). 6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a [mal presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. 7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing. An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within thirty (30) after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. c~_. '~ ~~/, ~.. / ./~"."."- ".- ) City Clerk 1880 Main Street . Centervi((e, MJ{ 55038 (651) 429.3232 . 'fa/( (651) 429-8629 ST A TE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENTS Mr. & Mrs. Charles Baumann 6903 Centerville Road Centerville, MN 55038 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota will meet on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street, in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed assessment for the utility and street improvements within the plat known as Hunter's Crossing and along a portion of Centerville Road. Adoption by the council of the proposed assessment may occur at the hearing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed: HUNTER'S CROSSING PLAT PID# ADDRESS R23-31-22-32-00 18 R23-31-22-32-0013 R23-31-22-43-000 1 R23-31-22-34-0002 R26-31-22-12-0005 6953 Centerville Road 6945 Centerville Road 6939 Centerville Road 6907 LaMotte Drive (Laurie LaMotte Park) 6925 Centerville Road 6903 Centerville Road Country Ridge 6892 Centerville Road 6756 Centerville Road (Hunter's Crossing) R23-31-22-32-0021 R23-31-22-32-0005 R23-31-22-32-0004 R23-31-22-32-0002 & R23-31-22-32-00 19 The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is $16,708.40. Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the fIrst of the installments to be payable on or before the fIrst Monday of January 2001 and will bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. To the fIrst installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the assessment resolution under December 31, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. .. (J " You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk/Treasurer. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City ClerklTreasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the rate of interest that will apply is eight percent (8%) per year. The proposed assessment roll is on file for puh]ic inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $622,495. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be as fn 11 n\ YO;;' 1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testifY by narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. 2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's witnesses. 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the council. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape-recorded (video-taped). 6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. 7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing. An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.08] by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within thirty (30) after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after'service upon the Mayor or Clerk. c- --~~ . -~'0~~--- .'f/1 ./ . -\ ) City Clerk 1880 %ain Street . (entervi[[e, :A{'J.{ 55038 (651) 429-3232 . ~ra,t (651) 42~J.8629 ST ATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENTS Gor-Em Development 10738 Hanson Boulevard Coon Rapids, MN 55433 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota will meet on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street, in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed assessment for the utility and street improvements within the plat known as Hunter's Crossing and along a portion of Centerville Road. Adoption by the council of the proposed assessment may occur at the hearing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed: HUNTER'S CROSSING PLAT PID# ADDRESS R23-31-22-32-00 18 R23-31-22-32-0013 R23-31-22-43-UOO J R23-31-22-34-0002 R26-31-22-12-0005 6953 Centerville Road 6945 Centerville Road 6939 Centerville Road 6907 LaMotte Drive (Laurie LaMotte Park) 6925 Centerville Road 6903 Centerville Road Country Ridge 6892 Centerville Road 6756 Centerville Road (Hunter's Crossing) R23-31-22-32-0021 R23-31-22-32-0005 R23-31-22-32-0004 R23-31-22-32-0002 & R23-31-22-32-00 19 The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is $2,561.60. Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday of January 2001 and will bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the _ assessment resolution under December 31, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due shall be _ added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. . (I . You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk/Treasurer. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk/Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the rate of interest that will apply is eight percent (8%) per year. The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $622,495. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be as follows: 1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testifY by narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be foHowed with the olJ.iector's witnesses. 2. "2 ~. T'h........ A\...,;r"'I..--.t........ ?"\o"''''l' 'h.o rC\1""\'rC\C"P-nt",.-t h", """"1....,C',,1 .I. JJ\,.- VL'J........'-'.L ..J.J.L..o.~ v'"' .l......,t-'.l\,.-J....J..L........... "JJ .....Vw~J.......'"'..l.. 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the council. The entire proceedings will be tape-recorded (video-taped). At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing. 5. 6. 7. An OMler may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within thirty (30) after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. . (/" - /1 "L:."~' . ' ..... ;;~7" '-"- ------ " ~', ............ \ " -....,-., "//1,,1' ./ )(:l?v.k.< ~ City Clerk uta6[ished 1857 1880 :Main 5treet . (entcwi[{c, :JI,[J\[ 55038 (651) 429-3232 . '.Ja;l..~ (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENTS Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Vanderbeek 6892 Centerville Road Centerville, MN 55038 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota will meet on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street, in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed assessment for the utility and street improvements within the plat known as Hunter's Crossing and along a portion of Centerville Road. Adoption by the council of the proposed assessment may occur at the hearing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed: HUNTER'S CROSSING PLAT PH) # AVUKCSS R23-31-22-32-00 18 R23-31-22-32-00 13 R23-31-22-43-000 1 R23-31-22-34-0002 R26-31-22-12-0005 6953 Centerville Road 6945 Centerville Road 6939 Centerville Road 6907 LaMotte Drive (Laurie LaMotte Park) 6925 Centerville Road 6903 Centerville Road Country Ridge 6892 Centerville Road 6756 Centerville Road (Hunter's Crossing) R23-31-22-32-0021 R23-31-22-32-0005 R23-31-22-32-0004 R23-31-22-32-0002 & R23-31-22-32-00 19 The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is $16,434. Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday of January 2001 and will bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the assessment resolution under December 31, 2001 . To each subsequent installment when due shall be e added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. ... () " You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk/Treasurer. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk/Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the rate of interest that will apply is eight percent (8%) per year. The proposed assessment roll is on fIle for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $622,495. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be as follows: 1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by narrative or by examination. and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. 2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's witnesses. 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the council. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape-recorded (video-taped). 6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a fmal presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. 7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing. An ovmer may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within thirty (30) after the adoption of the assessment and fIling such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. c__ .. ~~4dj ~> City Clerk ~ta6[isfied 1857 1880 I).{ain 5treet . Centervi((e/ ']v('J{ 55038 (651) 429-3232 . :fa:c (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENTS Mr. Rick Carlson 7671 Central Avenue Northeast Fridley, MN 55432 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota will meet on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street, in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed ~""f'''''mf''nt f0f the utility and street improvpmf"ot" withill tnt;> pht known RS Hunter"s Crossing and along a portion of Centerville Road. Adoption by the council of the proposed assessment may occur at the hearing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed: HUNTER'S CROSSING PLAT PID # ADDRESS R23-31-22-32-0021 R23-31-22-32-0005 R23-31-22-32-0004 R23-31-22-32-0002 & R23-31-22-32-0019 6953 Centerville Road 6945 Centerville Road 6939 Centerville Road 6907 LaMotte Drive (Laurie l' ....' " n , \ LUjV!'..}ll",- .1 u.l C\..) R23-31-22-32-0018 K2J-3 1-22-32-UU 1 J R23-31-22-43-0001 R23-31-22-34-0002 R26-31-22-12-0005 6925 Centerville Road 6903 Ctmeniiie Rum.i Country Ridge 6892 Centerville Road 6756 Centerville Road (Hunter"s Crossing) The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel ofland is $571,053.10. Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday of January 2001 and will bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the assessment resolution under December 31, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. . ."' .- ) .. You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk/Treasurer. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk/Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the rate of interest that will apply is eight percent (8%) per year. The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $622,495. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be as follows: 1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. 2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's witnesses. 1_ The ohjector may he represented hy counsel. 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the council. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape-recorded (video-taped). 6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. 7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing. An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within thirty (30) after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. ( . ._~ /J ~~ /- ~' -/ -;.- ."--u---4",,- jJ~--,: _ --~ City Clerk -, . MEMO DATE: September 7, 2000 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE 200 I Fete des Lacs Committee Structure ............................................................................ Mr. Ray Devine has requested that the following item be placed on the agenda as new business. Mr. Devine is proposing a formal structure for the 2001 Fete des Lacs Committee. Enclosed is the outline for the plan. It is important that the committee structure is decided soon so that this group can start the work for planning next year's celebration. Memorandurrt To: From: Date: Subject: City of Centerville Ci1 y Council Members Ray DeVine, Fete des Lacs 8- 30-00 200l Festival Committee The 2001 city cdebration is comin ~ up quickly and I am recommending to the City Counci l that we set-up an )fficial committee to plan the event next year. I feel that this process needs to be done fair and I have spoken to a lot of people who feel this is the corre.:t way to go. There are several issues that need immediate attention for next year's event. I would like to have a meeting with the members of the new 2001 Festival Committee by Oct. 19,2000. In Older to do this we will need to advertise these openings and fill the seven St :ats rather quickly. Enclosed, please find more information on how~he coml rlittee could be structured and how we could fill the seats on the c,ommitt(e. One of these iss ues, that needs imllediate attention, is the land located north of Laurie Lamotte Park. Last year, we were allowed to use 1 acre of this land at a cost of $200. It would be in the cities best interest to secure this land for next years celebration. I f~el this is something we want to approach the church abod right aWclY. I am asking for the City Council to approve the sending of this letter to the church. If you have any questions or need clarifications please feel free to give me a call. Ray De Vine Fete des Lacs Committee 651-407-1800 or ray@raydevine.com 7-1 S~~~6M2001! My ideas for the 2001 Festival Committee have been derived from my experience in planning and staging the 2000 Fete des Lacs, from countless hours of talking with members of last years committee and countless hours of discussions with other members of the community. I feel we need a more structured committee, not because I think the event will be more successful, but rather to spread out the workload and try to minimize some of the issues that arose last year, when we worked as an informal committee. I feel last year, because we were pioneering new trails ancl breaking the mold of what had been done in the past, it was necessary to hElve an informal committee. We are hopefully wiser now and learned a lot last year. Jggal Issues My ideas for the committee for next year consist essentially of a seven-member committee, similar to the park and rec or EDC committee. I have attached a set of bylaws created from looking at the bylaws of our current city committees. Also, all meetings would be open and would follow "Roberts Rules of Order." 8Qpointment I would suggest we contact our committee from last year and residents that helped in other volunteer capacities and invite them to submit a "letter of interest." I would also recommend we advertise the openings on the sign at city hall and in the Quad Community Press. It would be fair at that point for the city council to review the letters and consider who was involved in the event last year when making appointments. I am confident we would find the seven necessary members without further problems. What would these 7 people do? I have enclosed a sketch outlining what each member of the committee would be responsible for. I am confident that some if not all of these members would need several people working with them to accomplish these items in a timely manner. This outline may need to be adjusted, I was not directly involved in all of these areas of the 2000 Fete des Lacs and do not have a firm grasp of what it takes to put on some of these events. 1. Parade, Main Stage 2. Carnival, VIP Night, fireworks 3. Donations, sponsorship, legalities, Raffle 4. Advertising, Volunteers, Coordinate W/ Lions & other local groups 5. Street Dance, Teen dance, Craft Fair/Business Exposition 6. Parking, First Aid, security, Set-up, Clean-up, placement of events, tents, RR, Trash, electrical 7. Softball Tournament Each committee member would be required to submit the following information in a timely manner to the rest of the committee: . Preliminary budget . Concerns that the operations crew or security crew needs to know about. . Plan of how their event would be laid out . Number of volunteers they will need . Final budget . Advertising requirements and highlights These are only guidelines to show what each committee member will be responsible for. As I have said all along, we will need to have some sub- committees under these seven members. It will be the responsibility of the committee member to handle securing a sub-committee if necessary and handling meetings of the sub-committee. In conclusion! As I said, this structure plan was derived through much hard work and conversation with others in the community. I could not begin to list all of the things that we as a committe e learned last year. One thing we did learn is that we need a more formal structure to our group. That is also the main reason I want to inform last years Fete des Lacs committee of the opportunity to be part of the planning this upcoming year. All of the members of last year's committee learned a lot this past year and we can't lose that knowledge. I appreciate all the support I have received from the council on this matter. I will be in attendance at the next city council meeting to answer any questions that may arise. As always, I would like to thank you in advance for your consideration. Ray DeVine Fete des Lacs Committee City of Centerville Festival Committee Bylaws Purpose: the Festival Committee is hereby established in the City ofCenterville with the purpose of planning and staging the annual city celebration. Composition: the Festival committee shall be composed of seven volunteers. Committee members do not have to live v..rithin the City of Centerville. The City Attorney, City Engineer, Building Inspector, City Staff and Public Works Department shall be official advisors to the committee and may be asked to attend meetings to help with decisions. Term of office: members shall serve a one (1) year term, commencing the second meeting after the event. The Committee shall supply a recommendation to the City Council after the first meeting after the event. At the second meeting after the event the committee shall appoint a Chair and Co-Chair from within the members of the committee. - Vacancies: vacancies occurring during tbe term shall be filled for the remainder of the current term by majority vote of the members. Removal from office: any member of the committee can be removed by a 4/5 vote of the City Council. Secretary: a city staff liaison or other staff member will be responsible for creating minutes. Attendance at the meetings is not required, in which case the meeting will be tape recorded for purposes of creating minutes. Meetin2s: the Festival Committee shall conduci at least one meeting per month and could hold as many meetings as necessary to pn perly plan the event. All Festival Committee meetings will be open to the public ( nd a Quorum is required to take a vote on something. Quorum: a quorum shall be a 4/7 majority, alsl j no action can be taken on anyone particular event unless the person responsible fo' that event is present or has written to a member of the committee or staff hi slher appro\ al to act on said event. Procedure: The Festival Committee can adoptules for the transaction of business, shall keep a record of all motions, resolutions, transal lions, findings, minutes and reports. These shall be reduced to writing and a copy for Narded to each member for review and approval at the following monthly meeting. An 1genda will be prepared by the Chairperson or City staff and distributed to all iT attendance at the start of each meeting. Dear First of all, I would like 'iO thank you once again for helping plan and put on the ;ity celebration this past year! ! Now that the dust has settled, it is time to start planning next year's event. I have very high expectations ~)f next year's city celebration. I would like to see increased attendance. 1'd like to see the church, Boy Scouts, Cub Scouts and the elementary school ge1 involved. 1'd like to lower the price of the carnival, and bring in more rilles for teens. 1'd like to do more with the sponsorship program and the lolunteers, offer them a discount night at the carnival! I have high expectaions and they may not all come true, but we need to start doing it. ..... . One of the many things we Ie tmed last year, is that the committee needs to be more structured this year. I think for the first year, we needed to be informal, we needed to pione: ~r new pathways, and we did that. This year we will have a more formal c')mmittee as well as the sub-committees. We will have seven voting memb ~rs who will be in charge of different areas of the festival, then we will havt sub-committees under these 7 members that will work on each individual went. The only fair way to place these seven members on the committee is to ask for "letters of interest" and let the Council decide. Again, I war t to say if you don't want to be a voting member on the "Committee" that's OK, we will still have sub-committees, and everyone is invited to the meetings. Please fill out the form encl~ ~sed and drop it off at city hall. I am hoping to have the people who were .lctive in helping last year, help with this year to plan a great event. It is im portant that you fill out this form right away and return it to city hall so w( can have a meeting soon! The deadline for accepting "letters of interest" is Sept. 22, 2000. For legal reasons we will not accept any letters after this date. The council will be appointing members to the committee on Oct. 4,2000. The first meeting will likely be Oct. 19,2000, more informaton will be forthcoming. Please call me if you have an/ questions at all! Ray DeVine 651-407-1800 August 29,2000 The Church of St. Genevieve 1664 Heritage St. Centerville, MN 55038 Attn: Gene Noll Dear Parish Council members, As I'm sure most of you are aware the City ofCenterville's Fete des Lacs committee used the vacant church land, located north of Laurie Lamotte Park, as a parking area for the "larger than ever" city celebration this past July. We had a financial arrangement with Henry Cardinal. I understand Mr. Cardinal leases the land from you on a verbal agreement for about $364.00 per year to farm hay. The financial arrangement we had with Henry was for payment of $200. In return we were allowed to park on about 1 acre of the land. The land we used was invaluable to the city celebration, and was very appreciated. We are planning the 2001 city celebration in much the same way. We are hoping to expand the events and attendance as well as the parking area. Weare also considering changing the date of the event, at this time, no date has been selected. We would like to enter into a written agreement with the Church of St. Genevieve. This agreement would allow us the use of the vacant land for the city celebration and would allow Henry Cardinai to use the land to farm hay. We would be willing to lease this parcel of land from 1 he church for $500 per year for as many years as the church would be comfortable with. I feel this arrangement would benefit everyone in the community. I have enclosed a sample lease agreement. We would be ready and willing to enter into this agreement anytime in the near future. I would also encourage the chUTe h to take an active role in the city celebration next year, there are tons of opportunities for fundraisers at this event. Last year we estimate attendance at about 3,000 people, next year we are shooting for 5,000. I would be willing to talk with a group of parishioners or the church council about some ideas I have. If possible, I would like this le.tter to be put on the next Church Council meeting agenda for Monday Sept. 25,2000. I will be in attendance at the Church Council meeting that evening. I look forward to answering your questions at that time. I would like to thank you in advance for your consideration. Thank you, tr ~\j~ Ray DeVine Fete des Lacs Committee MEMO Date: September 8, 2000 To: Honorable Mayor and Council From: Jill Lien Re: Holiday Party I have contacted several restaurants for the Holiday Party dinner for Council and Staff. Most have already been reserved, but I have found two (2) that have openings for December 9th and 16th. Included are copies of the menus, from the Shorewood Restaurant, which is located in Fridley on Highway 65 near Interstate 694, and from Majestic Oaks, which is located on Bunker Lake Boulevard in Ham Lake. If Council selects the Shorewood Restaurant, we are able to choose three (3) entree choices from the Banquet Menu (included). If Council selects Majestic Oaks, we are able to choose from 3 - 4 items from the Oaks Restaurant Menu, or we could select one item from the catering menu (not included), which carries a price range of$15.95 - $18.95. We would be in the Terrace Room which seats up to 50 people. I have already put a tentative hold on Majestic Oaks for December 9th, due to the fact that these weekends are being booked fast, and we have already lost December 2nd. I will need to confirm or decline on Thursday after your selections of the restaurant and date are made. We are also requesting staff's meals and all appetizers be paid for by the City. Thank you for your consideration! Shorewood Restaurant / Banquet Menu 571..3444 Prime Rib $19.95 Slowly Roested " served with^" Jus Filet ~janon $19,95 This 15 thl most tendep of all meats! Gl"illed and served with aMrnabe Sauc~ New Yo~ Steak 519.95 GI"H' (tel ,. topped wi tIa IIlUsflr'OOIlS Ir served with South Aallel"icen Sue" Roast Peooered Rfbeve $19.95 Marinat;ecf fn Soutfa AlIencan sauce and alive 011 and seroved with Pi~nt Sa~ Roa$~e~ StriDlion $11.95 Sliced" Hrved with "u$hf'OOll Brown Sauce Chicken Oscar SlS.~~ Sauteed chicken bl"e4st with .SpII"'fllIS, crab meat and served wit.h Hollandaise Sauce Otickef1 In Phyllo Sl6.IS hickeft, spinach. fete cheese & pinenuts rapped in phy110 and baked go,deft hl"Otm Qticken C9rdon Bleu S15.95 Rolled t;fttckeft breast, filled wfth feta dt..s. and hu se~ ...., ttt Do 11-.. i se Sauce GYros S14.95 0.." . bthe be$t' Ci...II. Rout .$~ with herbs and spfces Lobster rOil (market Dr;ct) Largestlobst4lr: L S pouftd. of lIIOuth-lQtering cM!lectahle lob~t~r Wal'~ve Pike Almondine $17.9$ Broitecl or pan fried with Alrtonds Sua Salmon S17.gj Fresh SellOa filet grilled ~ served with fresh ]1I11eftne Vegetab1M Broiled ~lmRo $17.95 Fl"Uh salltOft filet broiled to perfec:tion ~~il~ S~rimp $19.50 Sht"f.. baked in casHrole with Grecian Toat() Sallce and 'eu cNese Broiled Shri~ $19.iQ Jui~ shrimp broiled to perfection and served witl! ga,.1ic butter Garlic ShrimP $19.50 sttri"" sal$tMd llrith olivf! oil. garlic " ~t basi' Broil~ Sbr1mp $19.50 ]lIicy shnq:l broiled to p41!rfectton and served with garlic butt.r Surf Ie Turf $23.95 A 7 oz. ~f t"~r'oi~ , sb~imp c~ination Cajun Chicken LinQu1ne S14.95 <;rnled dlic::k.eft breast .arved over lifttuiM lIrith it spicy Ja1epeno Cream Sauce Cbicken Fettuccine Primavera $14.95 Fettuccine in our Alfredo Sauce with chickell an4 garden f,..s1\ v.ables All our entrees are accoqJaJIied with 0111" house salad, Idaho baked potato. ....totbles. bread I ch..5ft spread at'Id COlllttry b'l.tter. Coffee, tea and ..ilk is incl11dad with gl"CMlpS of 20 0'" /IlON. General Infonmation '(OUr' IMnQ s.elec:tiOft of three Ci) efttc-ee cho1ea or 1." should be sabmitbld to the ShoIWfOOd Il1O later than two week$ prior or your scMdllled functiOll. All prices a~ subject to 6.51 H1" tax and lSJ gratuity. A saall non-refundab1e deposit. 1$ requ1Nd. trI the eVlNlt of cuC:llllations. . 24 hour not1fic;ation 'is Nqu1red 01" tbfl gl"QUP win be charged according to proevious l1eflU eonf1l'tl1ltion. We do . open on SundllY$ for poarties of 100 peopl. or IIlDre. Extl"a food cannot be taken out of the restaul"ant. He t.1Ia,,1( you for thinking of thl Sho...-.oocl. Ask us about our' wide sellktioe of' appetizers, her, d' oeuvres. des:sarts and wines made esped*1ty to $ati$fy you.. party needs. . l.d ~'IO~.:! hdt70:6l S661-IZJE-l F [LE No. 377 08/24 '00 08: 34 lD: S 1 tet'nst i ve Resources FAX:612 735 2144 PAGE 1 IC OAKS LUB -r~;, rf{~.(!..!/.j iil ' - .3 ('" C ( "..v <.. p 1.:' ';:.; ,)' - Ii 2'S. 0 ,.' /{.u. i (>(( t- Two 18-hole Championship Golf Coursesplru on ExecutilJf! Nine Clubhouse featurinl -The Dales" (Rf.:staurant and Bar) Beautiful Banquet & Meet#.n1l Facilities/or 10-500 People ;,,! /_; r" TO: J( { t FAXNUMBER:_U::;/- 4'2.~- 8'&2-~ FROM: .b1.f\.il.~ DATE: g- /1-4 --(}(J TIME: Total Number of Pales IncludiDI Transmission Sheet: ~ ..:> JIAL INSTRUCTIONS: ~ CflLfl ~~O}v? - p1ILt WI ~ aiM( f1~~N( (jrIZ4 ! IF PROBLEMS, CALL (612) 755-2140 701 Bunker Lake Boulevard Ham Lake, MN 65304 Clubhouse: 76~-2140 ., Fax: 766-2144 Pro Shop: 756-2142 FILE No.3?7 08/24 '00 02:35 ]D:Slte~natiYe Resource: STtWFtd Potato Skin, - Potato fSkins !tuffed with chopped b@n, cheddar cheese, mQZZCll"flla cheese. dn' green onions. $erved wit" SQur cream . . . 5.50 SF'''''''' ~ Arf'k:hoke Pip.. FrKM spinaei'l, artichoke hearts, and parme!dn cheese. Served with 1'clast pQirt11. . . 6.95 Shrimp eo'KTall · Jumbo size chilled shrImp 5ery,d wiTh co:ktail sauce and Q lame/!. . . 6.95 Oic:ktn or Beef" Quescdilla .. GrllJld Tamil" shell! layered with ch"lce m meat, cheddar cheese, mouarel:t: chtese, and green onions. Served Yti1'h sol.lr creclm and sa!!Q. . .6.50 MoC'hc N~h~, "A mouna c; warm Tcrtllla c:kips covered with shredded lerruc:e, !pic:y beef or chicken, mozzarella c:neese, cheddar cheeH, clives, tomaroe!, and onions. . . 7.35 ~ So 1'112(;"0 Nt.2d1c. .. A hot plal'e aT fartilla chips and cheeses. . . 3.95 Sampler ~crit". .. l.or;e platr of "Macho NachQs'" C~i'Ker, Finger!, Potato Skin6, BufFal" Wltlgs Ql1d Mozzarella Sticks. . . 8.95 '"'eke" Wi"9' " Served plain, bufClIc or 1'Iriyaki !i;1e. . . 6..95 Oaks C"i1i · Served in OW" own fresh baked breQd bowl. . . 3.95 H~mC2C1e Soup · Ask ~r server. . . C:UF . . .1.95 bowl . .. 2.95 Drummi" " GoldlM brown, breaded chicken drummis$ ""'e~ with honey mIJ15Tcrd. . . S..9S Mouarel/d Sticks. Brec:ded chtleSe sticks . . .6.95 F"<<,14 PiZZ4 Scat . TrI2diticnal favarites on a fc~ia 1M: 'r&u'rc choice ar pepperoni, 5aUSQgt, cheese or vrgetarian. . . 6.95 WQ/TIe Fri,s Bdsket . . . 42S Oni,," Ring! Basket. . .5.95 ."~i:i;;ti::dWil1h" WiJ....:ibi.iJ~.. "-'triCe litil..,',"~J (,,. (.";:'t""'IU~" / -tla,-.:f(J(,,,...f FAX:612 755 2144 PAGE 2 s~l~iJJ $Qlads served In homemCfd, brtGG DooM, except :..a Fiesta SkClWhcJi Chlok," . Crisp greens, bok-cnoy, peapods and Ceatl 5pt't'U'ls tossed it' Q teriyaki dressing. Gornlsned wI1+, orange slices, !esame .if,ds, frJed wonToIT skins and teriyaki marinated c:hic;ken breast . . 695 1." Fima . T"m~, black olives, green onions, cheddar cheese and mixed Sretns in a fresh made tcrtilla shell. Served with salso, SOur cream <2nd gl.Iacamoie. Seasoned grr;und beef. . . S.9S Seascned chicken. . . 7.905 Chi~lc,n C""or S4/ad .. Crisp /'Qmclne, seasoned Cr'Clurens and fresh shredded parmesan ~ssed wi'/'n Our homemade caesar dressing ~nd topped with d grilled, marinated c~Jcke" breast . . 6.95 Ckef Sal~d .. Julienned ~C1m, 'hlrkey, swiss cheese, americ=" cheese, crisp grwns, 1'omat, wedge!, eggs and black olives. . . 6.95 Strdwbmy Cl1i,k," . Mixed greens, grilled chicken bl'lQi1', sweet summer strawberries, mand~rln O~"Qes, top~d with FoPPy-seed draisin9 Clnd t'Clsted sunflower seecs. . . 7.3C Sugg@stE:cl Wine~: Woodbl"i<igc: White Zitlfandelllf BiUI'woOQ Chardonnay \ ID:Slternative Resources All bl.lrgm t sandwiches served with." chafee of mes,woff!e &, chips or potato SdkJd. A.G.C. Burger .. V2 pound ch"r-griJIed burger served witi'! grilled onicns, elmerican cheese, bc:con, Ietn.lca and toft'\c2tQ with mQY<'nnalie on 't?Ie ~de. . .5..95 Swl.. Suf1et" .. Sd&rieed mushrooms, grBen "nIDrtS, ~nd swiss cheese. . . 5.95 FC'""Lls Bull Burg.r .. A 1 112 pound masterpiece ropped wiit american aria swiss cheese, raw red onion, tom~, IetTlu (lrrd ~". 5trved with homemade BSQ sauu an tile side. . . 12..95 Patiy M,IT.. Char-broiled to yotJr liking, tclpped wl#l olliens, pepp~rs, musnrooms al1d swll5$ cheese. . . S.9S e~" 3.chHH SUfi'" - Swiss, american and cheddar C:t1ce!eS 'tapped with b=on slices. Served with BBG sauce e/1 tha side. . . 5.95 Suig~Stl:!a Will..; E..:.(" uc.mGU',; Me..!;)t <I,' <:4/10 ()t )vntJm;, Ca"oernn FAX:612 735 2144 FAGc 3 c:.,!~ S~wi.J...C:f e",oQd Turkey Clwb .. Tender smckld TUrkey, sliced i'omdto, leTtuce, bacon dnd p/'tIvClc", cheese. Served on toast with tllOli rMyo. . . 6.95 ClubhoUSf · &can, lettuu, 1'Clman" mayc "nd freen illctd tlJrlccy. 5trved on your choice gf'toG!+Id bread. . . B.95 Birdl. ScJPldwic:h .. )Our :halee of dllc:kert cr tuna saldd. Served en a bQkery fresh croissant. . ..5.9: .< 0.11 S4"dwiehes · YOLJr choice of chicken sa/(:d, tuna salcld, horn, turke)l, ~ Oeef or corned beef, piled nigh. . . halT. . . ~~ whole... 5.25 6lJ' · &,an, lettuce and tcmal'o. . .5..95 Sugested Wines: lIIO$(:ftH)unt Tnmine., ReisJlni or {oPl1eridge Chardo~ ~ S"l~wi.J...~J Midw...r Pork Tendenoln · Pork tenderlQirr hand-breaded and fried gcldefl brown. Served Qn a ~ bun. . _ 6.25 Gril~ Reub." ~ Gelle~u.s portion of =arned beef, !durirau'i', swiss clwse Q"d ThoU50nd island dres!5iMg. Served Ort grHled pumpernlckel bread. . . 6.23 mM~ Oil' . Thin .Ucld ro~ beef an a grilied French ~II served with aLljus. . .6.50 WrI'h melted pl"C'foIQne. . . 6.95 Hot TlJrkty Dr Beef .. Served op,n..fac:ed wfrlt real lr\C2sned ~,gl"OYy and fresh vegftcble, . .7.S0 H~ Philly.. Choice of chicken or beef ,mottJered w!#r SOLl1Hd mushl'Oa:'n!, anions, grwr. peppers ond melted monterey jQ'~ c:heese. Served on a toasted hoagie bun. . . 6.25 n,cGCt:;cr Chic:kIn Sandwich . Six O\Jnce chIcken breast grilled and Jerwd on a fCCClccic2 bread wrth tomato, . baCO". melted provolone and spro4l1'5.. . 6.95 e8Q Pork Sandwich.. slim roasted shredded pork in our homemade SeQ sauce.. . 6.50 5cttter Cip,,~ CDd 5"ndwic~ - Our own cod ~~and~~~5~~Q~~Q~ona grilled heagie. . . 6.25 Sugg~'l:~d Wines: l'..'tfr...e St, Mal'tit'l MI;rr1ot "..VidlOJl \:ilardl.lhna)l FILE No.3?? 08/24 '00 03:37 lD:Slter~atjve Resources f ! \ All entrees m SliI~ wHn N~ ti~" or nouse saiad ancl " GhoIr;c at ~ or rlt:e. ~utlslffllll n~ fer $l.so H~IA'JIC .$twk .. 10 cune, '~Cfce NGlW lll"k brailed to your Iikln~. Strwd wi1fI SGUteed mushrooms and anion straws. . . "l4.9S Ribcyc Steck . cnar~rifled ribe'/e\ Served wfffI sautNd rnushrcoms and onion s!'raws . 12 =z. . . 14.95 . 16 =. . . 16.95 Filet Mignon.. 6 QLlra fiIr.rt ~~ in ban, CL"(lkod to your Hkirtg ::II'Id topped wltn .sc1It'eed mU!n",Dms ~d ~"ion 5i'n2ws. . . 17.95 &!'eofc; $Gndwt," . a DUI'lCC New York served ()pen~ ~I'I tDa5t witt! smJ'tecd m~hmoms and onion ~. . . 1295 Add ihrimp tel your S1'IQk, brcUed, breaded ~r' ~mpi . . . S-" "'.'ted Win"" ;;':"-J.l~cl Ul.l:.et'r..., v. r~u,j'" ~",,'lot ~Mlecti_ sarv.c ~ t~. Atk ~r serwr for Nlec1ioPlS.. Heu.. SmClkaG ley 80Gk Rh full slab . . . 14..95 112 .lGb . . . SJ.95 ~ ChWft<< Ilibt .. 3 pieces of fried ,nlckfn and 112 sicb 56Q rk . . 1.3..9S aU wtli1e c:f1icken I3dd 1..50 ~kt Fried Ckicken 3 f71tceS .. . 8.95 5 plas . .. 10.95 r-11aw. ~ Dim. .. Brecd.d pork cvrlrr ~ mrJahed ~15 and peppmd counTry style g~ . . . 10.95 Majestic's ~CI"'M't'y/. PiZICI- Ask your serwr for +orlight's fear.nd 12 Indl pia crnd Frier. "'~~.ii:e-J Wi'filtf; ~...cj i\lo'r...:u.'~'lh:r",t ~ ;;L~....';;. ~c: '.,,;i ti ;'';''':'''N\AJ~~ (h....U..n.1lotay FAX:612 755 2144 PAGE 4 .aJI pasta ct5Ns wwd wHit uup ~ Sldad and ffttsh baked bread. .Patcz PrimaverCl .. Fe11uccil'le tceed with CliNe oil, Sdrllc .and CI variety gf fiw~ v~bfes. . . 1095 ~kid L4sGgnd · laagna ~les layered with tine mecrfs, onions, IMIinara and pIemy af~. Serwd witk nwh bNd hread. . . 10..95 ChiNft ~ .. Sarteed chiclcan, CI"ItIIft, garic: arrd ~1"9 ~ wi111 ~ n +'mlshed Wttr gnrtRd parmesan titen t=pptd witt! Sh~ enftM. . . ~.95 Wrtft m_ ~ . . 13.$ JumDo Shrimp.. 5 jumbo sftrimp ~rllc: broiled, beer bettered, or 5Cmnpi . .. 11..95 ~r"Fry .. Terryakki slyIc beef elr cnlckln, criOn1'al .~Ies. wved OWl" steGmed rice wjff, fio!ed W'Dn1'cns.. . 14..95 Shrimp... '17.95 S.4TFo<<J ~ Pm.K:lne .. Flavored 10rnatCJ bQsl! fet!ucine,;.IumDo snri"" aJo,s ~ wttn _ sarlk:, whttr win,. ksrbs end fresIT ~ nnished '" a i'cmtrlo lmrln . . . 1a* Chick", C4m Pcwtc .. e~Md ::hlQen breast 5erved with a ip~ "If'ntdc SQ~, and fresh ~bles 'tcssed wnft fet1vdne . . . 13.95 L.emcn Pepper Chic:q" P=.tC.. Chicken ~ IIgIrHy brecded I2nd JeG5Ol'1ed Wrl1lemcn pepper. ~ end HrVed ever C3 bed rllemon pepper Iinguine wttf, veget'obels end fr.,ished witt! clive oil . . . 1.:2..95 '~';.4~:";'."~'I("J I,"hla:\~ ~~id.....1fl (.r.J.....~;;~.iIA? ~' ~_1..~ ,J....~..;.u~ ~t=l h..,' I LL i'J~''''~ (f \)01'<::4 . VJ VU; J( I1.J; .:.> I tet':',tlt I ve l<e::<:iUt'Ces The Oc:ks Ow" Desum . Cne,SC=kd du .iallr · See ief"oM For uJccHons. . . 2.95 iiramlaD "11:lI1an $pCTigealle &M,red with espl'8S6:) Qnd c:ogna: m~ c:&eese ~ wiift Gl "'1ft e/~. ..3.S0 ~Icrt't Tu1't'l. Cclkc · Rich de\rQ's kod CQ"- . I:yered wi1fl choemate fudgl~ rcos1'td ~ns and caramel. . . :2..95 En,lJslot 1.11MB T.,m .. lJght cake /Qynd with letMrl and cream.. . 225 SLlU*StQ(l Wi.io:~. Gallo of Sonoma c...b~"I""1. ~ }i!lu:l Juh"lInls~(g KIesling : Hi" :l:'l::: '::,~:. ;::144 i-Hl::iL :. D..-It ~ ......,...,. ~ ~~ ~ ~. A1J. ~ w..,....., ~ ~~ ~...... fr-J11w,... - ~ 04 ~.\...'II rl J' Vt ~.. /('(,lr(~/~' l~ __ e tiil w~ ~, ~"""fI: ~~ """'~~J Parties c( ~ gr Me wil/IM ~(lr.td on (In, bill (nc i'ID'I'D ,h.) MI'ft tS~ -.r'~ c;hQ~ Included. ~~,'-"" ~~., ,~ .~ ,_,-;;;;;I , ~-.- ., p', Tap Beer. HJlJ.r Lite HGD LeI~1 Klllions Red Mic:hrloc tSGlden LJg!Tt 8udweiar ~!5~ Bcrie Beer Jama Page Paie Ale James Page .Amber ~l!!" Michelob Leil1ctnkugei eHelnek4'lI Can Beer Ccol'i Light Miller Li'te MOO Mlcnelcb Golden Ught MIcheJcb Golden OraA- Killians Sudweise Bud LIght C'Ooul's MEMO DATE: September 8,2000 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE : Proposed Chain of Lakes YMCA ............................................................................ Included in your packet is some information that was retrieved from a meeting that was held on September 7,2000. This information is for discussion purposes only. It will be important to discuss this proposal prior to adopting our final levy for taxes payable in 2001. I want Council to be aware of the potential financial commitment that could be made to this project. The YMCA of Greater Saint Paul & The City of Lino Lakes Draft Development Agreement Highlights 1. City of Lino Lakes Capital Fund raising commitment of $2,000,000. · $1,500,000 in Cash . $500,000 in Land & Infrastructure · Payment & Land transfer to be made once construction begins 2. YMCA of Greater Saint Paul's commitment to build and operate a YMCA facility of approximately 40,000 square feet that includes: . Swimming Pools . Gymnasium . Teen Center · Child Watch · Kid's Gym . Aerobic Studio · Strength & Cardio Equipment Room · Walking/Running Track · Male, Female and Family Lockerooms . Lobby · Offices 3. Length of Agreement will be Fifteen Years. 4. The YMCA will build and operate a free drop-in Teen Center for the length of the agreement. 5. The YMCA will reduce joining fees by 25% for City or Lino Lakes residents Cor the length of the agreement. 6. The YMCA will reduce monthly membership rates by 10% for use of this new Chain of Lakes YMCA for City of Lino Lakes residents for the length of the agreement. 7. The YMCA will provide 4 Community Nights each year free to City of Lino Lakes residents for the length of the agreement. . ,~ Participation Options Draft - September 7, 2000 * Based on estimates of population Circle Pines = 5,000 Hugo = 6,500 Centerville = 2,500 Lexington = 2,500 Lino Lakes = 20,000 City of Circle Pines $166,666 - 5 year agreement $333,333 - 10 year agreement $500,000 - 15 year agreement City of Hugo $216,666 - 5 year agreement $433,333 - 10 year agreement $650,000 - 15 year agreemcnt City of Centerville $ 83,333 - 5 year agrcement $166,666 - 10 year agreement $250,000 - 15 year agreement City of Lexington $ 83,333 - 5 year agreem ~nt $166,666 - 10 year agree nent $250,000 - 15 year agree nent $ 33,333 for 5 years $ 66,666 for 5 years $100,000 for 5 years $ 43,333 for 5 years $ 86,666 for 5 years $130,000 for 5 years $ 16,666 for 5 years $ 33,333 for 5 years $ 50,000 for 5 years $ 16,666 for 5 years $ 33,333 for 5 years $ 50,000 for 5 years . . Chain of Lakes YMCA Capital Campaign Fund Raising Report - September i'\ 2000 Gifts Secured To. Date City of Lino Lakes - Cash & Land Molin Concrete - Cash & Produet John & Elcanor Yackcl Centennial School District - Program agrcement pending Glenn Rehbein Companies - Earthwork est. Northern Technologies Lino Lakcs Statc Bank Gary Uhde - GM Developmcnt American Guidance Services, Inc. AdGraphics Fairview Lakes R~gional Medical Center & Foundation Kraus Anderson Midwest Construction Company United Community Network Darrell & Bev Silverness Dwight Benoy - Professional Roofing Services Ten Board Members @ $5,000 Two Board Members @ $2,000 Nine Board Mcmbers @ $1,000 Friends of Lino Parks Foundation Festival Foods/Knowlans Total Raised to datc: Long Term Financing: To Date: Total committed to. project: $2,000,000 250,000 250,000 125,000 100,000 60,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 25,000 8,000 5,000 5,000 50,000 4,000 9,000 1,000 1,000 $3,126,000 $1,500,000 $4,626,000 YMCA capital Gift Chart for the New YMCA project 9/00 $6 Million+ project # of Gifts $ Amount Cumulative Total Progress 1 2,000,000 2,000,000 1 gift 1 1,000,000 3,000,000 2 500,000 4,000,000 3 250,000 4,750,000 2 gifts 4 100,000 5,150,000 2 gifts 6 50,000 5,450,000 6 gifts 10 25,000 5,700,000 1 gift 15 10,000 5,850,000 1 gifts 20 5,000 5,950,000 12 gifts 25 1,000 5,975,000 15 gifts 50 500 6,000,000 100 100 6,010,000 ~ - Chain of Lakes YMCA Board Class of 2000, 200 I & 2003 & Board Leadership Class of 2001 Dan Anderson Lawrence Biehn Craig Bode Blake Gorowsky John McClellan Mike Muske Steve Pech Mark Rehbein Linda Waite Smith Kadi Johnson Michelle Vanselow Board Leadership Class of 2002 Class of 2003 Pastor Charlie Brown Mark Groff Howard Juni Dr. Kellie Kershisnik Monte McCoy John Milbauer Dr. Richard Ottomeyer Kara Palas Kim Sullivan Elise Tagg J ohn Yackel Gary Hook Matjaz Korosec Janet McGough Jennifer Kromrey John Christianson Jeff O'Donnell Rick Carlson Paul Montain Board Chair: John Milbauer Board 1 sl Vice Chair: John McClellan Board 2nd Vice Chair: Elise Tagg Y Partners Campaign Chair: Kim Sullivan Y Partners Vice Chair: lloward Juni Finance Committee Chair: Elise Tagg Program Committee Chair: Kara Palas Facilities Committee Chair: Mark Groff Board Development Committee Chair: Pastor Charlie Brown Capital Campaign Chair: open YMCA Executive Director: Darrell Silverncss Chain of Lakes YMCA 2000 - 2001 COIDlnittee Charts of Work FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE . Monitor 2000 Operating Budget . Review and approve operating & capital budget for 2001 . Monitor 2001 Operating Budget . Direct Y Partners Annual Fund Raising Campaign - $35,000 . Direct Annual Golf Tournament - $20,000 BOARD/VOLUNTEER DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE . Volunteer Identification . Board Recruitment/Orientation/Involvement . Board Education . Board Evaluation . Recommends Board Candidates, Terms & Officers PROGRAM COMMITTEE . Develop monthly teen events . Develop monthly family events . Ensure timeliness of program promotion . Survey community re: program needs/wants & teen interest . Ensure core values are emphasized FACILITIES COMMITTEE . Assist with selection of arch/contractor . Develop design plan - site plan/elevations for promotional use . Develop cost estimates for new facility CAPTIAL CAMPAIGN STEERING COMMITTEE . Raise needed Capital dollars - minimum $1.5 million . Identify and recruit Capital Campaign Chairperson YMCA of Greater Saint Paul Strategic Plan 1998 - 2~)02 y YMCA We build strong kid" strong families, strong conunwuoes. . YMCA of Greater Saint Paul Long Range Strategic Planning Process Chair: Don Gruber , The YMCA of Greater Saint Paul is engaged in the process of formulating a vision and strategies for the next five years. The Association Leadership Council has met since March, 1997 to review societal trends, demographic projections and YMCA trend lines. In October, 1997 the Association Leadership Council held a strategic planning retreat to draft a vi.sio~ and strategies for the next five years. These will be presented to the Executive Committee of the General Board for review on November 5, 1997. From there, the executive staff will be asked to develop association objectives to achieve these strategies. The total plan will then be presented to the General Board on February 4, 1998, for approval. Within this framework. branch.boards anc;l staff will develop branch objectives, and staff will develop branch annual plans to carry out those objectives. The Association 1999 Annual Plan will then be framed in accordance with the long term strategies. STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT PARTICIPANTS: Don Gruber, Chair Lynn Anderson-Scott Russ Barrett Cheryl Baughn Beth Baumann Kelly Beenan Torn Brinsko Robert Burow Don Chapdelaine Kathy Cheng John Duntley Susie Gilbert Jeri Glick-Anderson G. Scott Goyer Vance Haesemeyer Peggy Hedback Torn Holland Karen Holzer Steve Howard Al Imhoff Leann Lasure Patricia Love Patty McGrath Larry Mitchell Laura Oberst Bob Olafson Pat Riemersma Brian Rupe Deanna Sande Phil Scearcy Andy Shern Darrell Silverness Tun Staley Rolf Thompson Joseph Ulrey Jim Wazlawik. Robert (Skip) Wilke Facilitator: Pat Lynch y YMCA We build strong kid" strong families, strong conunw.ities- . YMCA of Greater Saint Paul Strategic Plan 1998-2002 The YMCA of Greater Saint Paul, as a part of its commitment to stewardship and service. has prepared this strategic plan to guide decision-making and evaluate programs. This plan will incorporate five segments: l. Mission Statement II. VlSion Statement III. Strategies IV. Association Objectives V. Branch Annual Plans The first three components have been the focus of volunteer and staff study since March 1997. They were crafted and reviewed by numerous groups and reflect the consensus view. The last two components will be developed by staff and volunteer teams to carry through the vision and strategies outlined herein. y YMCA We build strong kids, strong families, strong cornrnwuUcs. . YMCA of Greater Saint Paul Mission Statement The YMCA of Greater Saint Paul practices Christian values by providing opportunltlcs for cveryone to build strong k\ds. strong families and strong communities. Vision Statement The YMCA of Greater Saint Paul will be a leading force in the conununity by: . Emphasizing core values of caring, honesty, respect and responsibility in all we do. . Collaborating to better serve kids. families and communities. . Promoting healthy spirit.. mind and body for all ages. . Providing fun, meaningful experiences and a place to belong. Strate~ The YMCA of Greater Saint Paul will advance the mission and vision of the Association over the next five years by focusing on the following strategies. We will: . Create capital for investment in new program or facility opportunities. and for program participation by low-income individuals. . Expand programs and facilities to serve high-need and high-growth East Metro communities. East Metro communities are defined as St. Paul, surrounding suburbs and the St. Croix Valley. . Substantially increase teen program. participation. . Advance our mission and programs through collaborative relationships with: - Public, private and nonprofit organizations. - The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis. . Develop new ways to infuse fun, meaning and a sense of belonging into our YMCA programs and facilities. . Position the YMCA as 1M organization that promotes healthy spirit.. mind and body for all ages. y YMCA We build strong kids, strong fanUlies, strong conunW1ities. . MEMO DATE: September 8, 2000 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE : Storm Sewer Realignment - Lloyd Drilling (1873 Main Street) ............................................................................ As you may recall, Council previously discussed a request from Lloyd Drilling for permission to realign storm sewer that exists at the property across the street from City Hall. The current storm sewer runs between the existing vacant commercial lot and the existing home at 1873 Main Street. At a previous meeting, Council chose not to grant this request until it was determined whether or not a Rice Creek Watershed Permit would be required for this site. Included in your packet is a memo from the RCWD stating that a permit would not be required for the development of this site. The only reason a permit was required for the stripmall on the west side of Peterson Trail is because a small area of wetland previously existed on that site. I would recommend that this request be approved. City Engineer Tom Peterson has previously reviewed this proposed realignment. . ~~/05/2000 1~:41 S!51-?0&-41g; ~ICE CRr~k W OIsr PtlGE Ell Lloyd Drilling cia '1'bwtlOD's Jewell')' 70S West Lake Screet Mpl.. MN 55401 356' N. LIluNC;TON AVE"IUE. WITi 330 AADtN HlLU. MINN!!OTA. ~~'2WOS6 ~ t6S1/l'66-41g, . "'1\ (651) 766.419& Rice Creek Watershed Re: Centerville Proj= September 6, 2000 Dear Mr. Drillina. n.u you (or the oppommity 10 mriew your project site to determine if you need to obtain :a permit hm Ric:c Creek WmnbeQ Diwlct I havt com~leted an m-oftioe rniew of a. project sn. and have dCWmlined tbat tbwe are no wedmes on IUe, the sife is 1lOt withm 1000 feet of a DNR Protected Wile' or 300 mt of. ditch uad the site ill_ rhan 2., aem, Out lD$pector had a convC'Sation with Jnn Marsh of the City of C~llc and det=m.inrd ttal the li~ 11 not wlthm . flood pla~. Becaute me project site "snot mM any of tht leWD's criteria rO\' a permit )'Ol.l will D.l be required to apply fbra permit. SinefrCl). -11~ DJ!aA-- Mie~\! D. Huwoa En\'iroam.et1taJ EdlQUon & Permit ~tor \ ~. \ J I r(\ \, c: COn~c:e G'1 ~ It,.~I''':'''' A.~. tAltOj~L. sri. ~ C'OUI.T\ tOARO Of MAN4CiEJt, ~M WAOf;:Jw. ROeCRT M. HULT OfCOEfN , 1t.A"TWEN ~(;~ ~tol;""" __'co~ ~II\' "",r5ONc--,~.,~f)._. ~ ""1I;I\.DN S.I(OHI:'UJ.1QO; ~ ~1Alo('"SI''''''''''' EUGfl';ll. 'nf~ON .--. (:()IJ"'I'\' MEMO DATE: September 8, 2000 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE 2001 Budget, Resolution 00-18 - tax rate increase, Resolution 00-19 - certifYing initial tax rate ............................................................................ Included in your packet is Resolution #00-18. This is in regards to a relatively new law that requires that this type of resolution be adopted if the City is considering a tax rate increase. Even though we are contemplating keeping our tax rate at the same level, we will need to adopt this resolution and file the resolution with Anoka County. Council adopted a similar resolution last year. Resolution #00-19 needs to be adopted so that we can certifY our proposed initial levy to Anoka County. This proposed levy would keep our tax rate at the same level. Council will have the ability to decrease this levy prior to final levy certification, but will not be able to increase this levy amount. A copy of the latest revised proposed budget will be distributed at the Council meeting. utaflishd 1857 1880 Main Street . Centervi[[eJ Mg{ 55038 (651) 429-3232 . 'Ja:c (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION 00 - 18 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TAX RATE INCREASE WHEREAS, The State of Minnesota has enacted Chapter 243, Laws of Minnesota 1999, Article 6, Section 2 requiring municipal governments to have adopted and filed an authorizing resolution if its municipality tax rate turns out to be higher the following year than a theoretical tax rate for the previous year under the law; and WHEREAS, there are numerous factors that are beyond control, the City of Centerville may need to have a higher tax rate for the following year, and if the tax rate has to go up, the City of Centervi!!e wishes to be i!1. compliance with the 1mv \vith an auth()r;7;n~ resolution being filed with Anoka County; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that if the tax rate of the City ofCenterville for the year 2001 is higher than the tax rate certified by the City of Centerville under clause (3) of Section 2, Article 6, Chapter 243, Laws of Minnesota 1999, the higher tax rate IS hereby authorized by the City of Centerville City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that an official copy of this adopted resolution be filed with the Anoka County Auditor, who for purposes of this law in Anoka County is the Division Manager of Property Records and Taxation. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this 13th day of September, 2000. Mayor ATTEST: Jim March, City Administrator ~ta6{isfied 1857 1880 Main Street . Centervi{[e, MJ{ 55038 (651) 429-3232 . 'Ja;c (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTYOFANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION 00 - 18 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TAX RATE INCREASE WHEREAS, The State of Minnesota has enacted Chapter 243, Laws of Minnesota 1999, Article 6, Section 2 requiring municipal governments to have adopted and filed an authorizing resolution if its municipality tax rate turns out to be higher the following year than a theoretical tax rate for the previous year under the law; and WHEREAS, there are numerous factors that are beyond control, the City of Centerville may need to have a higher tax rate for the following year, and if the tax rate has to go up, the City of Centerville wishes to be in compliance with the law with an authorizing resolution being filed with Anoka County; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that if the tax rate of the City ofCenterville for the year 2001 is higher than the tax rate certified by the City of Centerville under clause (3) of Section 2, Article 6, Chapter 243, Laws of Minnesota 1999, the higher tax rate is hereby authorized by the City of Centerville City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that an official copy of this adopted resolution be filed with the Anoka County Auditor, who for purposes of this law in Anoka County is the Division Manager of Property Records and Taxation. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this 13th day of September, 2000. Mayor ATTEST: Jim March, City Administrator Tstab[is/ied 1857 1880 Main Strcet . (cnterui[{c! M'J{ 55038 (651) 429-3232 . 'fa?\.. (651) 429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION 00 - 19 RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2000 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 2001 BE IT RESOLVED, by City Council of the City of Centerville, Anoka County, State of Minnesota, that the following sums of money are levied for the current year, collectible in 2001, upon taxable property in the City ofCenterville, for the following purposes: T,... t..,J 1 ""." J. v\.~... J..._.... I; General Fund: $1.210,000.00 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor, who for purposes of this Imv in Anoka County is the Division Manager of Property Records and Taxation. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this 13th day of September, 2000. Mayor ATTEST: Jim March, City Administrator CITY OF CENTERVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION & CITY COUNCIL JOINT WORKSHOP July 19, 2000 -- Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission and Council of the City of Centerville held a joint workshop at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. ROLL CALL COUNCIL PRESENT: PLANNING & ZONING PRESENT: COUNCIL ABSENT: PLANNING & ZONING ABSENT: Staff members present: Council Member Terry Sweeney Council Member Linda Broussard Vickers Commission Member Ray DeVine Commission Member Barry Brainard Commission Member AI LaMotte Council Member Tom Williarber Council Member Dick Travis Council Member Mari Nelson Commission Member Rob Sheppard Commission Member John McLean C0111mi~siuH Member Ud viu Nllan Commission Member Brian Hanson City Administrator Jim March * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 6:32 p.m. NEW BUSINESS None. OLD BUSINESS ORDINANCE # 4 Page I of2 Council Member Sweeney stated that he had spoken with Mr. Todd Gardner, 1817 Fox Run, who requested that Council Member Sweeney relay his opposition to recreation vehicle restrictions contained in the ordinance. Mr. Joe Steele, 6926 Sumac Court, was present and concurred with Mr. Gardner's opposition and stated that his children use the vehicles and it occupies their time. Mr. & Mrs. Doug Frederickson, 7055 Eagle Trail, were present and also concurred with the opposition previously stated and reiterated that they would move out of Centerville ifneeu be;;. Council Membtr Sweent:) stateu that he lia::. SPOke:ll with all firefighters and they are against any additional restrictions. Ms. Vickers spoke about Council and Planning and Zoning's efforts to reach compromises with the proposed draft. Steve Whittet, 7162 Brian Way, stated that he owns a motor home that is 32' and did not want to see additional restrictions. Several members of the audience wanted to see the length of recreational vehicles be increased to 35' versus 28'. Greg Owens, County Bank, presented members with a proposed sign for County Bank and stated that the sign would include such items as weather, time, etc. Mr. Owens stated that he felt sign restrictions should be different for commercial sites abutting county roads. Mr. Owens stated that he would forward other communities' commercial sign restrictions to Planning and 7nn;no -------v. Council Member Sweeney stated that residents could bring forward a formal petition for any item contained in the new ordinance. OlS('TTSSTON ITFM(~' None. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Committee Member DeVine, seconded by Member Brainerd to adiourn the Planning and Zoning/Council loint workshop of July 19,2000. All in favor. Motion Carried Unanimously. The meeting was adjourned. Transcribed by Teresa Bender, City Staff Page 2 of2 CITY OF CENTERVILLE COMMUNITY ACTION NOTICE PART I. BACKGROUND COMPLAINANT Address IWilharber I First Name 68491 [Centerville Road 1------------ --- ----~ L ~ Phone # - home ~oma~-=-~j - j Last Name Phone # - work [~29~-2i40 Complaint Number 341 Date Complaint Taken [==-~_~L5/001 r-------------. Time i 11 :00 AM! ,_________:..:-..-J BY: .J -----.---.-.-.-.-.---.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.---.- COMPLAINT INFORMATION ADDRESS: C----o] L________~ NAME (IF KNOWN): C~=--=-____-=~~:J C--~===J Last First Phone [--=~~=--=] Junk Vehicle [] Weeds 0 Animal 0 Noise 0 Other li': Explain ~--- - - ---------------------------------------------------------------- --1 IConstruction firm placing sewer and water services at Hunter's Crossing sub-division. Heavy equipment backed into corn I lifie1d approx. 75' destroying crop in that area. Mr. Wilharber believes that the sewer line or portion thereof is located on : his property. I i I I~ L / ~~~.~~ ! I - ......<Z. ...;/1 i I I What type of Response is Required: Immediate RW::C:Dr\MC:1: M"Ti-J0r'" Time Permits L' Complaintant Informed (:::~;:!:':::;:J:-:t ~;:::;;;cnse Required Department Referred to: Bonestroo (Department) ---.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-----.-.---.-.---.-.-.-.---.-.-.- PART II. FOLLOW UP: Dan (Employee) Action Ta k en [Fa-;senttoBo nest~ooand-notified J ill1-Ma~ch aT com-plai~t~-~M~.Wi-lha~be~ willp~ese~-tpictl;~es-t~Ucouncil. --I I I I Completed Date of Action Person Contacting Complainant: Department: _._,_,_,~,_'_'_'_'_I_'_'_'_'_'_'_'-'-'_'-'_'_'-'-'-'-'_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. Additional Information (p3~ -/.1/1 CITY OF CENTERVILLE COMMUNITY ACTION NOTICE Complaint Number I 371 l First Name [Vanderbeek 689211Centerville Road __~ I Phone # - home ! Date Complaint Taken I 916/00ll' L-----___~_~ Time r---12:20pMi L_ _J . PART I. BACKGROUND COMPLAINANT Last Name ~n Address L Phone # - work I BY: I~ L-___~__U___U~~ ---.-.-.-.-.---.-.---------.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.---.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- COMPLAINT INFORMATION ,--------------' r-------~----- ADDRESS: I 01 L NAME (IF KNOWN): -1 J Phone ~ i L_____J II _...J '-- Last First Junk Vehicle Weeds Animal Noise Other ~ Explain ConstrUCtion workersatHunter's CrosSing cut telephone-line today~une was-dra-ppe-doverupo-werTines-andiaYlngir;--U- front yard. While telephone company was out to property they reported that if someone used the phone there was a 'possibility of electricution. Spouse does daycare out of the home, telephone company advised that all children/adults 'stay away from wire due to possibility of stray voltage. Mr. Vanderbeek stated that this is the fourth time they have cut ,the phone line. Mr. Vanderbeek also stated that the construction workers did not notify of the cut today. L-~____._,_~_~_._____._~____'~__~~_'______'__ __ _.~.___________________________.________~___..____.__a----- --------.~---_. - ,----.-. - - ---- --- -- ---.-- What tvoe of ReSDons", is R~ml;r"rl' Tmmedi~te V: Time pprmits Complaintant Informed Complainant Response Required ~ RESPONSE METHOD: r.--~------ --------- i!~I~phorl~__ Department Referred to: Bonestroo (Department) Dan S. (Employee) -.-.-.---.-----.-.-.-.-.-.-------.-.---.-.---.-.---.-.-.-.-.-.---.---------.-.-.-.- PART II. FOLLOW UP: Action Taken Completed lJ Date of Action Person Contacting Complainant: Department: _.___._.___.___.___.___._._._._.___._._._._____.___._.-,-,-,-,-,-,-----,-,-,-,_'_'_1 Additional Information CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JULY 26, 2000 6:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call II. PUBLIC HEARING (S) III. APPEARANCES/AWARDS IV. CONSIDERA TION OF MINUTES 1. July 12, 2000 Meeting Minutes V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS 1. The City of Centerville July 13, 2000 through July 26, 2000 2. Centennial Fire District Expenses 3. Interconnect Final Payment VI. SET AGENDA VII. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS IX. NEW BUSINESS 1. City Finance Advisor Review 2. Centennial Lakes Police Department Budget 3. Goetz Landscape Well Request IX. CONSENT AGENDA XI. COMMITTEE REPORTS XII. ADMINISTRATORS REPORT XIII. ADJOURNMENT < CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 12, 2000 6:00 p.m. I Not Approved I Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on July 12,2000, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Mayor Tom Wilharber Council Member Dick Travis Council Member Sweeney (arrived at 6:22 p.m.) Council Member Linda Broussard Vickers Council Member Mari Nelson ABSENT: None STAFF: City Administrator, Jim March City Attorney, James Hoeft City Engineer, Tom Peterson I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Wilharber called the July 12,2000 City Council meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. II. PUBLIC HEARING (S) III. APPEARANCES/AWARDS IV. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES June 28, 2000 Council Meeting Minutes Motion by Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Vickers to approve the June 28. 2000 Council meeting minutes with one chane:e on page 3 paragraph one under 1999 Anm:31 Police Report to make a change in the last sentence. modifying the word sight to "site." All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Council Member Sweeney arrived late and stated that he requested additional modifications to the minutes. Motion by Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Vickers to reconsider the June 28. 2000 Council meeting minutes. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. . Motion by Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Vickers to approve the June 28, 2000 Council meeting minutes as revised by Council Member Sweeney changing all references of 35W to 35E. and on page 6. last paragraph. the name should read Patti "Hess". All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. > V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS The City ofCenterville June 29 through July 12,2000 Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Vickers to approve the expenditures for the City from June 29. 2000 through July 12. 2000. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Centennial Fire District Expenses Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Travis to approve the Centennial Fire District expenditures. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. VI. SET AGENDA The following items were added to the agenda: . Mound Trail under New Business Motion by Council Member Travis. seconded by Council Member Vickers to approve the agenda with the noted addition. All in favor. Motion carried ullallimuu~i y. VII. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS Dean and Debbie Stahl - Ordinance #4 Mayor Wilharber noted a letter from Dean and Debbie Stahl, residents, and stated their concern would be addressed at the Work Session on July 19,2000. VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Hunter's Crossing - Final Plat and Developer's Agreement Approval Mr. March stated the City Attorney recommends approval of the final plat and Met Council recommends approval of the addition. He noted the appropriate name of the developer and other revisions made to the Final Plat and Developer's Agreement. Mr. March indicated the developer has approved of the changes. Council Member Nelson indicated concern for furthering this project without the assessment issues being settled. Mr. March noted this item has been stressed within the Developer's Agreement and that an actual cost would be known after bids were received to draw closure on the assessment issues. . 2 \ Mr. Hoeft added there is some risk when approving a development if residents are contesting their assessments. He encouraged the City to keep the numbers reasonable. Mr. Hoeft stated the numbers in the final assessment role need to be acceptable to all residents affected by the development. Council Member Travis asked if the future zoning preference for this site was R-5 or Planned Unit Development (PUD). Mr. March noted the Comprehensive Plan does not set future zoning preferences but rather leaves it flexible for the Council to make a preference to the density desired. He indicated an addition could be added to the covenants to state this development should meet the requirements for R-5, which sets the main floor square footage at 1,200 square feet. Council Member Vickers asked if the covenants would set the range of the house prices. Mr. Carlson stated he has set a range of $200,000 or greater within the covenant provided to the City. He indicated his sign states the range could go up to $250,000. Council Member Travis asked that the developer be held to either $200,000 or 1,200 square feet on the main level to meet the R-5 zoning requirements. Mr. Carlson requested special consideration to be given for two story homes that have less than 1,200 square feet on the main level, but are valued over $200,000. Council Member Vickers stated she would be comfortable with the price limit if the square footage cannot be met to keep the value of the homes up. She noted this could be addressed within Ordinance #4 for future developments as well. Motion by Council Member Vickers. seconded by Council Member Nelson to approve Hunter's Crossing Final Plat. and that the covenants contain a minimum valuation of the homes to be no less than $200.000. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Nelson to approve Hunter's Crossing Developer's A~reement as revised bv Staff. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Michael Zwicki - Driveway Access Mr. March reported this was discussed at the last meeting to assist the resident in gaining access to the roadway from his driveway. He noted a machine has been donated by Tri State Bobcat, to grind down the roadway which would then be repatched for access. Mayor Wilharber asked if a precedence would be set with this issue due to the fact the City is funding the patching and that Public Works time would be used for the grinding equipment. Mr. March noted a Public Works employee would be donating his time to work the equipment and that the asphalt would cost roughly $25-$50. 3 Council Member Sweeney noted the resident was asked to look into funding from the MS Society for grants and equipment. He stated the City is assuming the responsibility for accessibility when it should be the responsibility of the resident. Council Member Vickers asked that the time and materials be tracked so an irivoice could be forwarded to the resident for payment. Council Member Sweeney concurred. Council Member Nelson stated she was in favor of the project and felt it was the City's obligation to make the City handicap accessible. Mr. Hoeft noted the City has no legal obligation to complete this accessibility due to the fact the city street is to code and that the driveway grade is difficult at this site. Motion by Council Member Vickers. seconded by Council Member Travis to approve the use of the grinding equipment. for public works to grind down the street. an asphalt section be patched and that the time and materials be invoiced to the resident. All in favor. Motion carried. (Sweeney and Nelson opposed). IX. NEW BUSINESS City Finance Advisor Review Mr. March explained the financial advising company that contracts with the City is not as responsive to the City of Centerville as they used to be. He indicated there has been several recent issues with a lack of returned phone calls for bond work. Mr. March asked if the Council would like to take applications for 1 '"," ~, L~._;J _.....,.__.___~:__ ,. _,.. _ 11_ _ TT ,.,. ~ 1 uuUJ.~.LUJ.l<<.l u'-...u.J.."-L \r",;Vil1}Jal1H.,,~ UOC1Ul \;; Lu....... J..-1.1,..l11l\,.,1 "' \....-.1 V.)v.Hl,t:; .L."..... \' "'.1VtlHl~Hl h u.) issued. Mayor Wilharber asked if Ehlers has been addressed with the concerns and future position of the City. Mr. March stated he thought he would address the Council before this issue moved forward. He noted he would have no problem addressing them with his concerns as they would be justified. Mr. March added that an additional financial advisor would help to keep the financing honest for the City. Council Member Nelson stated she would like to see the City have another firm if full service is not being received from Ehlers by Staff. Council Member Sweeney concurred. Mayor Wilharber asked if the City of Circle Pines had been addressed as they use Juran and Moody. Mr. March stated he has not addressed them to date because he was uncertain of the Council's wishes. Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Nelson to advise Staff to gain pricing from Juran and Moody as a financial advisor for the City of Centerville. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mound Trail Discussion 4 Mr. Peterson noted he was contacted by Frattalone Excavating regarding the 560 feet of redevelopment to Mound Trail. He noted they need access for vehicles over 5-ton to haul materials in and out of the site. Mr. Peterson recommended this work be done at a dry time of the year, such as August, or after the ground is frozen. Mr. Peterson indicated the City is paying half of the redevelopment fee and that Buechler is paying the other half. He stated a $30,000 bond would cover an overlay of the roadway if the road were to deteriorate. Mr. Peterson noted this would greatly depend on the ground under the roadway. Mr. March stated an overlay was completed several years ago, which added I Yz inches of asphalt to the grade. Mr. Peterson indicated this overlay could increase the rating of this road to 7 -ton. Council Member Vickers asked if a time frame should be set for this redevelopment. Mr. Peterson stated he would have the authority to stop this project if the weather was not cooperating. Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Travis to approve the Mound Trail Redevelopment. that the developer and paver workout the payment of a $30.000 bond~ and that the timing of the redevelopment be approved bv the City Engineer. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. X. CONSENT AGENDA Ken Cook Performance Review, Based on Satisfactory Review - One Step increase to Grade 5, Step 5 Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Vickers to approve the performance review and pay increase for Ken Cook to Grade 5. Step 5. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. XI. COMMITTEE REPORTS . Council Member Sweeney noted the Parks and Recreation Committee are reviewing trail specifications done by developers and by the City to set a standard for the level and grade of each trail. Mr. March stated, in the future, all trails will have to meet City trail standards. Council Member Sweeney noted the new Chair of the Parks and Recreation Committee is Doug Porter. . Council Member Sweeney noted Karla DeVine has contacted the City of St. Cloud with regard to their BMX track. He indicated St. Cloud has a "top of the line" track and that riders pay a fee to a BMX Club to alleviate all liability from the City. Mayor Wilharber noted the City Clerk visited the skate park in Shoreview to gain ideas in this area as well. 5 . Mayor Wilharber noted the Anoka County Park and Recreation Committee invited the City of Centerville to an Open House on Saturday, July 22, 2000 for the Rice Creek Park. . Mayor Wilharber stated the Fete des Lacs buttons are now on sale for $5 each. XII. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Mr. March indicated the fences would be put up this Saturday in LaMotte Park at 9:00 a.m. Mr. March reminded the Council that there would be a Work Session meeting next Wednesday to discuss Ordinance #4. Mr. March explained the Met Council has a study for communities with 20 to 100 acre parcels that need development. He stated this was a free study provided by Met Council and that the City of Centerville would be applying for the study. XIII. ADJOURNMENT Motion bv Council Member Sweenev, seconded bv Council Member Nelson to adjourn the July 12, 2000 Council Meeting at 7:14 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial. Inc. 6 , " Centennial Fire District 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 784-7472 - Office (651) 784-2427 - Fax July 18, 2000 TO: City Council City of Centerville City Council City of Circle Pines City C0uncil City of Lino Lakes FROM: Milo Bennett SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures and approval for payment of expenses. Your approval of expenses, as listed on the attached copy of the check register, checks #12282 - 12292, in the amount of $30,557.55 is hereby requested. " Centennial Fire District Check Register Page 1 of 1 DATE CHECK# NAME ACCOUNT AMOUNT 07/18/2000 12282 Amaco Oil Company 42100 - Fuel & Lube $396.45 07/18/2000 12283 Bumper to Bumper 42000 - Vehicle Maintenance 35.47 07/18/2000 12284 City of Uno Lakes 41000 - Second Qtr. Salaries 27,242.52 07/18/2000 12285 Frattallone's Hardware 42110 - Other Maintenance 206.28 07/18/2000 12286 Geographic Information Systems 42130 - Equipment 156.39 07/18/2000 12287 Grainger 42110- Other Maintenance 60.81 07/18/2000 12288 Nickelson Plastic, Inc. 42130 - Equipment 309.40 07/18/2000 12289 Pehl, Hinschberger Associates, LTD. 42160 - Accounting Services 122.50 07/18/2000 12290 Pro Rider, Inc. 45010 - Safety Camp 834.00 07/18/2000 12291 U.S. West 42240 - Telephone 813.23 07/18/2000 12292 W.S. Darley & Company 42130 - Equipment ~ Total $30,557.55 Bones lTOO , j(osene f~IHlCs.troo. Rosene. AndcrliJ{ ..-tnd I~ \nCldtc.'\, )11(. is ~ll" Atip"mat"/c ,-,\oi-.')n/Equifl Opportunity (rnployer ,:md Employee Owned !)(ltFip.l!\: Oero (\ tlnlll'\trno, l-'i . ;.Irl]lI1 l. 1,(11 'i,I, )'i" ~ ',( lHJJJ!llil, {'C.. !,--'I rV /\ IJI :!dorl,?l 1'[ . ~ .. ~ ~ .'..... , j-\nae;Jjl< 6t Senior COll~tlltdnts: ).'ntH'): \~. ':.U):II) M.l i'l'JI:rl, CY/\ Pi- . _\1'111" (-'f. I I t I rill' I. iI, r ~ \ ; \ , Associates Associate Principals: Howdrd A. Sdlliord. PF:. . l<eiUl A. Gordon, ()L . 1~(11 'rt R, PFefferle:', vr: . f;:;c!ldrd W Foster, F)E. . DdVld O. Lo_~;(()t('l, PT, . Rotwrt C. /<usse)<, A.U\. . ~/;,1rl< A. Hclllson, P.F. . r\rlfchrre1 T. !<;-!Utrn..-mn, FE. . Ted I<'Fit'lc}. r~t. . Kenneth P. f\ndcrson. PE. .. rv1(~I" ft. !(oJfs, PL ~ DdVid A. n()[1('srroo, M.8.A . ~!dn['y [', \X/lil!c\!ll<.on, r1-:" L.S, . I\qncs i\l ({Inq \'1.1-1./\." AI!,'ln Rick Srhrl1idt, rT , ; '<:0 l ... Engineers & A.rchitects Offices: )1 FdU!. 51. Llouc( r~o(h('sU-'1 ,JnC! Wi!lm,-!J. MN . Mllw<lUKCC, IN! Website: www.bonestroo.com July 18,2000 Mr. Jim TvIarch City of Centcrville 1880 Main Street Centcrville, MN 55038 RE: W~ter Interconnect Ccnterville, Minnesota File No. 616-98-809 Deed' I\1r. March: The contractor has completed the punch list items and the utility improyemcnts have beer:. inspecled and confot'n"l to the specifications. This project should be considered complete ar:d be accepted by the city. lIere is a brief summary of the fin:ll amount. The amount i~ composed of the re~ain,lg~ t1:at remained on the project in the amount of $2,985.09 and the items not previously paid for in the amount of $175.00. The remaining item \vas the additior. aggregate base placed on Cedar Stred. Please sign all four copies and return the one stamped "engi~1eer's Copy" to 01.11" (If Dee. Contact me at (651) 604-4808 if Y0U have any quc:otlons or comments. Sincerely, BONESTROO, ROSENE,ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES /\ , , ,-. 17 / J / j I I ,i / . /./ /! ~ ,I ," // ./ .I / : . ' ... '.^L'~ft L{_<c~!>I-C-'t ~&V.1\~ /' Daniel S. Schlucncler . C''':: Enclosure 2335 West Highway 36. St. Paul, MN 55113 651-636-4600 i. Fax: 651-636-1311 f;:''='LJ ,;:.:.,. f" ';;::':./~i. ~ r~, f,'lt::<.~]I' ':-~""'; .;-,1,'...... ;~ "_"~ '_ ,_ ,,' ~ i3't~ :', .',; Y &''''\,' i"c. ,::i.,, ~:.....:.,~, · (i:;~ ,rF':!. 0,' p",,' \1'1' " ,'<'" '\:< . " ' 'v"',' , <,,^, "'" " ......>> ~ ... \:""'~ ' ",j .,."" r<k= j il. ~~" ,...," .1, ,. .;~i~ fJonestroo ::. Rosene U Anderlik & '11' Associates r Ownur: CIl of Cenlervilie, 18 0 Main St., Centervilie, /, iN 55038 For Period: 12/10/99 to 6/2; 00 Date: Reauest No: June 27,2000 3 AND FINAL Enginw'&Architectl Contractor: IN B Miller Inc., 101 Norris Lake Rd NW, Elk River, MN 55330 REQUEST FOR PA'{MENT WATER INTERCmlNECT BRA FILE NO, 616-9[J-809 SUMMARY Original Contract Amount $ 57,894.50 2 Change Order - Addition $ 0.00 3 Change Order - Deduction $ 0.00 4 Revised Contract Amount $ 57,894.50 5 Value Completed to Date $ 59,876.75 6 Material on Hand $ 0.00 7 Amount Earned $ 59,876.75 8 Less Retainage 0% $ 0.00 9 Subtotal $ 59,876.75 10 Less Amount Paid Previously $ 56,716.66 11 Liquidated damages - $ 0.00 12 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 3 ANC, FINAL $ 3,160.09 Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLII( & ASSOCIHES, INC. I " /' ~l/;" . . / .. '-'/t'{'r;----- (;/~I/-:')+'.~ I.') C/~/. /~/;:~ './;t.-}"~" ----.:::). v Approved by Contractor: W 8 MILj...5R INC " i '/' :l L(6~. 8. )/')1,,.[; (~ Approved by Owner: CITY OF CENTERVILLE ./:<-~.-.:?--:) Specified Contract Completion Date: October 29, 1999 Date: . request3Final C, ,ntract Unit Quantity Amount . no. Item Unit C !:Jntity Price to Date to Date BGS~ Bid - Vhtr, intercor nect 12'PVC LF 40 33.50 70.5 $2,361.75 2 8"PVC LF 31 27.00 32 $864.00 3 6'PVC LF 5 34.50 23 $793.50 4 5" valve hydrant EA 1 2250.00 1 $2,250.00 5 Connect to existing 12 x 12 tee EA 1 805.00 1 $805.00 6 Connect to existing 16" stub EA 1 805.00 1 $805.00 7 12" gate valve and box, in place EA 2 1100.00 2 $2,200.00 8 8" gate valve and box, in place EA 2 650.00 2 $1,300.00 9 6" gate valve and box, in place EA 1 450.00 1 $450.00 10 Fittings LB 2500 0.70 3050 $2,135.00 11 Silt fence LF 50 8.00 100 $800.00 12 Sodding, lawn type SY 100 11.50 $0.00 13 Seeding with mulch AC 0.1 10350.00 0.1 $1,035.00 14 Pressure reducing and Me['2r Station LS 1 42325.00 1 $42,325.00 15 Improved pipe foundation LF 50 11.50 100 $1,150.00 16 Aggregate base, Class 5 TN 20 25.00 24.1 $602.50 Total Base Bid - Water Interconnect $59,876.75 . Total Base Bid - Water Interconnect $59,876.75 Total Work Completed To Date $59,876.75 e requesl3Final PROJECT PAYMENT STATLS OWNER CITY OF CENTERVILLE BRA FILE NO. 616-98-809 CONTRACTOR W B MILLER INC CHANGE ORDERS No. Date -1 DE scription Amount Total Change Orders PAYMENT SUMMARY No. From To Payment 1 10/22/99 11/15/99 52,390.60 2 11/16/99 12/09/99 4,326.06 3 AND FINAL 12/10/9) 06/27/00 3,160.09 Material on Hand Total Payment to Date $59,876.75 Retainaqe Pay No 3 AND FIf'IAL Total Amount Earned $59,876.75 . requesl3Final Retainage Completed 2,757.40 55,148.00 2,985.09 59,701.75 59,876.75 Oriqinal Contract $57,894.50 Chanqe Orders Revised Contract $57,894.50 MEMO DATE: July 21,2000 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE : Finance Advisor Proposals ............................................................................ Included in your packet are proposals from the firms of Ehlers and Assoc. and Juran and Moody for financial advisor services. Ehlers and Assoc. has been the consultant that the City has used for the last thirteen years. Juran and Moody has been soliciting the City's business for the last four years. I had asked both firms to provide a written quote for the fees they would charge for the issuance of the bond in connection with the Hunter's Crossing project. Both fIrms would like to give a ten-minute presentation to the Council on why they should be selected as financial advisor. Juran and Moody will give the fust presentation and then will leave the meeting. Ehlers will be called in last to give their presentation. Both of the firms have asked for this process and do not want to be present in the chambers when the other firm is presenting. I I II t ~ . II III . II II I 111 I I [II I I I I " EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC July 20, 2000 The City Council Centerville City Hall Centerville, MN 55038 Re: Proposal to act as financial advisor We are pleased to submit our proposal for providing financial advisory services to the City of Centerville in connection with the sale and issuance of $750,000 general obligation bonds. Ehlers & Associates, Inc. has been financial advisor to the Ci~ since 1987, working with the City on many and varied projects. Because no one financial activity (such as a bond issue) is an isolated event, it has often been important to coordinate activities and issues. The files for these thirteen years are all available in our office and have enabled us to monitor possibilities for refinancings and to have reliable records for City staff when needed for reporting and other purposes. We feel the following have been important aspects of our service to the City: Because it was important to the City Council to hold competitive bond sales for issues over $300,000 or more, we assisted the City with 10 competitive bond sales over this time, all receiving three or more bids. The Council has felt that competitive bidding is the best way to represent the public in securing the lowest possible interest/financing costs. When the Council was interested in undertaking water and drainage projects to encourage commercial/industrial growth for tax base purposes, we assisted with the establishment of tax increment districts which provided funds to allow these projects to go forward while minimizing the property tax impact. Equal Opportunity Employer LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE Charter Member of the National ASSOciation of Independent Public FInance AdVisors 3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, MN 55113-1105 651.697.8500 fax 651.697.8555 www.ehlers-inc.com ~;:. '.,~ ._~ > ~_,~"",,,,,,,,~'_~_ ,"~__ ,",:"""L!',l'i"'~''1"", .. ~ ,_ ''fi~7'.'!' ':'f,"'iI'lI",<~;^,1""'f'~':~~ro"",~,,"""''''\'-~'''''7'" "":'1',.'..... ";.~.'lIl!1"r_'."'t.. ,~.-~,......:....,., j~tr'{-'-"-7~?1" .','" -'~.,,! "t.'.,; ":".\. ".. -", - ~,:.. ,-''T_,.~""_...,.,_~.,,,~_ ~ "~-~~(.~.~t~,".''''T,,'1 '~"!"IIII!IIP" I I I . I I I I I I I [I I I I I I I I I The City Council Centerville, MN July 20 , 2000 Page 2 When the City's bond issues have been quite small, we've worked to save issuance costs (and underwriter's discount) by negotiating the sale with a local bank, thus keeping the transaction local. This has saved money and has created good working relationships locally. We successfully arranged (after competitive bidding) the lease-purchase financing which provided funds to build the new City HalllFire Hall project in 1992. We worked with the City to refinance bond issues to save interest costs in 1996 and 1998. In 1997 Ehlers & Associates, Inc., working with the City and the Anoka County HRA successfully sold bonds to finance the senior housing which the City had been pursuing for a long time. Favorable interest rates (ranging from 4.25% to 5.75% over 30 years) allowed this project to be more affordable for the City's senior citizens. Tax Increment Financing has become extremely complex and demanding. We have assisted with responses to the State Auditor on TIF questions the City has received and are currently working on TIF compliance as well as the annual TIF reporting and other TIF related work. Ehlers & Associates, Inc.; Experience For the 36-month period from July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1999, Ehlers & Associates served as the financial advisor for the sale of 815 bond issues (mostly competitive sales) for local governments in this region. Since 1990, we have provided financial advisory services to 187 Minnesota cities. Appendix A illustrates the variety of services we provide to Minnesota cities, the mark of a full- service financial advisor. Many of these activities are inter-related which enables you to do some "one-stop" shopping. -~ I I I . The City Council Centerville, MN July 20, 2000 Page 3 I Appendix B is the local Cronin calendar, a list of competitive bond sales scheduled in the region, indicating the issuer, date of sale, type of bond, and financial advisor (or underwriter/advisor). We have included two examples, from June and July of this year, to illustrate that Ehlers is in the market with competitive sales on a daily basis and understands what it takes to structure and sell bond issues competitively in order to get the very best interest rates.. I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I Ehlers & Associates, Inc.; An INDEPENDENT Financial Advisor The term "independent" is a hallmark of our firm. Our policy is to remain independent of any underwriting or investment banking interest in any financial service provided. This means that our only interest is serving you and looking out for your best interests. It also means that our compensation is based completely on the fee we receive from the City. Are there firms which are not independent? Yes, underwriter/advisors are primarily in the business of buying and selling bonds and often providing investments but may also want to serve as your advisor. While this may be seen as a difference in philosophy, we feel it is a conflict of interest to serve both bond buyers and governmental units. Bond buyers want the highest rates possible on their bonds; local governments was the lowest rates possible. The underwriter/advisor serves two masters. Most underwriter/advisors will prefer to negotiate some bond issues which could be sold competitively. They may receive additional compensation through the negotiated bond sale that . an independent advisor will not. Most of the firms shown on the Cronin calendar of competitive sales (Appendix B) are independent consultants (which are most common in Minnesota). You will see a few underwriters. When bonds are sold competitively, the City officials know that the lowest bid is the best they could do on that particular date. When bonds are negotiated, meaning they are sold directly to an underwriter without competition, there is no way for a council to know for sure whether the rates they have been offered are the best they could have obtained that day. Quite often, there is a significant difference between the rates offered by the underwriter submitting the lowest bid and the competitors. No one underwriter is always the best bid. . d...",....~........ I I I I I I I I The City Council Centerville, MN July 20, 2000 Page 4 We believe that, unless the bond sale is very small in size or if the structure of the issue is very complex (not likely with most city issues), a competitive sale should be held. For a small size bond sale, we suggest making every effort to sell it locally to a bank in the area. Most underwriter/advisors will suggest purchasing an issue to be negotiated themselves. Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Inclusive Fee I I I Ii I I I For the sale and issuance of approximately $750,000 general obligation bonds which we understand the Council is presently considering, we propose a financial advisory fee of $6,000. This includes all meetings with staff and council, printing and distribution of the official statement for the competitive sale of bonds, advertising, conducting the competitive sale, supervision of all necessary documentation, preparation of a permanent bond record summary, and all travel and overhead expense. Ehlers will have no additional billings related to the bond Issue. The City can also expect to pay the costs ofa legal opinion from the City's bond attorney, the cost of a paying agent, and perhaps a fee to the County Auditor for furnishing information needed in the Official Statement. In Summary We believe Ehlers & Associates, Inc. to be your best choice as financial advisor for the sale of the City's $750,000 general obligation bonds. Our experience with bond sales in general, and specifically for the City of Centerville, gives us and the City access to all the information and expertise necessary to hold a very successful sale and provide the financing. We have valued our relationship with the City over the last 13 years and are hopeful it can continue into the future. We believe that, together, we have accomplished good things. I look forward to discussing our services in more detail at the July 26 council meeting. I I I I - Sincerely, /.1 / " /. , ! .? Lc ~j/J/flL/ {J~ Carolyn Drude Executive Vice PresidentlDirector I Appendix A I Ehlers Service to Minnesota Cities I Ehlers & Associates provides an long history of service to Minnesota cities. The table below lists the Minnesota cities we have served since 1990. This table not only demonstrates the number of city clients, but also the breadth of our service to these cities. I ...........\;~CitY>........ ... !.....i.BOUClS<..i I....... . ." u>....... ........... < ...... ...... ...... ...(> . ....tIF\....;.. EcotiOri"lic . . Other .........>..,..>... Oeve!opittent Jipu!>jng .... Legi!.i!ative Projects ..... ..... Andover v v Apple Valley v v Arden Hills v v v Ashby v v Audubon v v Bagley v v Barnesville v v Barrett v Bemidji v v v Benson v v Big Lake v v v Blackduck v v Blue Earth Utilities v Braham v v Brandon v v Breezy Point v v Bricelyn v Brooklyn Center v v v v v Brooklyn Park v v v v v v Brooks v Buffalo v v v Buffalo Lake v v Cambridge v v v Carver v v v Cass Lake v v Centerville v v Champlin v v v v Chanhassen v v I II I I I I III 11 Ii I I II I I I I I .:.<..... .......:......:..... ....Ji....<'i:...:.. .........11F- .Economic........ '.' .... ....:' . -,-- Other :., ....,""".<City'. " :. ....,. .....",': ...... -, Qevelopmeot 1"!ousing Legisl~tive Projects' Chaska v v v Chisago City v v Chokio v Chisholm v v Circle Pines v v v v v Clara City v v Clarkfield v v Clarisa v Clearbrook v Cloquet v v v v Cokato v Columbia Heights v v Cosmos v Cottage Grove v v v v v v Crosby v Crosslake v v v v Dawson v v v v v Deephaven v v v Dilworth v v Duluth v v v v v v Eagle Bend v East Gull Lake v v v Edina v v v Evansville v Eyota v Falcon Heights v v v Farmington v v Frazee v v Fridley v v v Garrison v v v Gibbon v v Glyndon v v Goodview v v v v I I I II I I I 11 ,r.II lit I: It II - I II Ii rI ~-" ;,-;,_;",?,","~~,,,_., "'I"'!"p~_""$: 'I-,~;"""'{"'.':"' ~ :Jl'/~ r:<T~~--"'- ~-"'~,"'~~':"''''Y''~~ "';"'-'--:~ . .........- .... ........>.. . < ..... .... ..Ec?ryorilic . ... ..... I Other. ...... .....city ........................ [Bond!;; ..TIF ........ .> Legi!>laHV~ ........ . Projects ., .'.:. . ." QeveloPIllent !-iOljsing Grand Marais v v v Granite Fall!> v v .... Greenwood v .... Hackensack .... Hallock .... Hamburg v Hanska v .... Hastings .... .... v v Hawley .... Henderson v .... Henning v Hermanlown v .... v Hibbing v .... .... .... v v Hoffman .... Hopkin!> v .... v .... v v Houston v v Howard Lake v Hugo .... .... Hutchinson v .... .... .... v .... Inver Grove Heights v .... Isle .... Jenkins .... .... Jordan .... Kandiyohi v Kenyon v .... .... v Kerkhoven v Lake st. Croix Beach v Lake Shore v Landfall .... .... v v Lewiston .... Lexington v v Uno Lake!> .... Litchfield v .... .... .... II ~I I . . II rtI III II II - - I II I , , - i I I l ":~>'''"''~~~''''.< ..,._........_""'~.~_."~......~_~~' ''''-"';-n''~.,''''''-;'~'. _"!" ~~~.-..."~~.-_~,..,_'"'~__'.._>.~ ...--"' r~-."T~-.....-r-,'--J ~-"_''o.'_.. ,~". .,,_.....,:-:'1'..-'"'....."":-.._."''<'"-..,~.,....1 ~-~ " I , ...... ..{;~lt~;i'.'.'.".""'" .......,... <;d-.__..i' .>,: ..........\.+IF.........~..I ...,'. ..' ." ".' .i,..................>....'. ...... . <"". . ,., :;." ...... IF'I E cPrt()J:JliC ........... ...... Legislative pt!)(!r .......' ..... ..': DevE!.lopi1)enl....,. .C' Project!) Little Canada t/ t/ t/ t/ Long Lake t/ t/ t/ t/ t/ Madison t/ t/ Mahnomen t/ Maple Grove t/ t/ t/ t/ t/ Marshall t/ Utilities Mayer t/ Medina t/ Menahga t/ t/ t/ Milaca t/ t/ t/ t/ t/ Minnetonka t/ t/ t/ t/ Monticello t/ t/ t/ t/ Montevideo t/ t/ t/ t/ Moose Lake t/ t/ t/ t/ t/ Mora t/ t/ t/ t/ t/ Morgan t/ t/ t/ Morris t/ t/ t/ t/ t/ t/ Mound t/ t/ Mountain Iron v' , t/ t/ .. New London t/ t/ t/ New Germany t/ New York Mills t/ Norwood t/ Norwood Young t/ t/ t/ t/ America Oakdale t/ Olivia t/ t/ t/ t/ Onamia t/ t/ t/ Orono t/ t/ t/ Ortonville t/ t/ Ottertail t/ Owatonna t/ Parkers Prairie t/ I I I I L'il.. II I r~1 II II il fl [ t ~ II ;1 J. " .,. ~ 'U; ~ I - ~ ~ . , !I r I ~I ;~ ....,\, -",{., '~..i,"'(','" ........................... ...... .. I>;' ". ;........~c?nClMib............. .... I......... Other , .... f>rojed~ I.<,..,.I~Y ....... ............. i...... >TIF'........ .QevelClprpent .. Housing. Legislative '. .... Pequot Lakes t/ t/ t/ Perham t/ t/ t/ Pillager t/ t/ Pine Island t/ t/ Pine River t/ t/ Pipestone t/ t/ t/ t/ t/ Plymouth t/ Prior Lake t/ Princeton t/ t/ Raymond t/ Red Wing Port t/ t/ Authority Rice t/ Richfield t/ t/ t/ t/ t/ t/ Riverton t/ Robbinsdale t/ Rollingstone t/ Roseau t/ Rosemount t/ t/ t/ Roseville t/ t/ t/ Sacred Heart t/ Sandstone t/ t/ t/ v t/ Sa uk Rapids t/ t/ t/ v t/ t/ Savage t/ t/ Sebeka t/ Shakopee v Slayton t/ t/ Sleepy Eye t/ South Saint Paul t/ t/ t/ v t/ t/ Southwest Metro Transit Spring Grove t/ t/ SI. Cloud t/ t/ t/ SI. Francis t/ :1 - I I I I I ."~. ,'!,' ,.', :t .:~ . f ~ [ ;~ f- ,,~~ r ~ .;j '. I " l.- r i. t.~. I r. 1E:>' . '.' """".,;.;.' i i:" " '.. ..........::;.: ' .:;....: .' " I'> ,; ,:"',,""'.' ".,',.' :.i" '. I. :.i_rl~(" .:EC?llorniC< .1:".,......:...".,:.... l.egislative ". qmer .>>l.iIW>\:" . Qe\1eloprrieot: , : Projecfs 51. Louis Park t/ t/ t/ t/ t/ t/ 51. Michael t/ t/ t/ t/ 51. Paul t/ Stacy t/ Stillwater Stockton t/ Taylors Falls t/ t/ Thief River Falls t/ t/ Tower t/ t/ Tracy t/ Two Harbors Vergas t/ Waconia t/ t/ t/ Wadena t/ Walker t/ t/ Walnut Grove t/ Warroad t/ t/ Waverly t/ t/ West Saint Paul t/ t/ Westbrook t/ Wheaton t/ Windom t/ t/ t/ t/ Winsted t/ Winthrop t/ t/ Worthington t/ \Nyoming t/ t/ Young America t/ t/ t/ t/ Total Cities: 187 r._ ~I ;1 .1 '1 I r :1 " I' fa f ~. , ' JI I ....... ,..",.. ,~ r~ ""...,(''''- '~"""J!' .,,...-~, ~ '("-;00' \Fli'VI".'" ~, ,f-""" .......T. ,..~...." ..... ,""" " ',. r--'-~"""""""u"~" ,~'--"'"- --,."....-..-". . -- - '. -~.------"- ....."r.,''"' ~._"" ~... . "" ~_ ~ I Appendix B I CRC)NIN & CO., INC. I. 601 SECO>m AVEi'\UE SOUTH" SUITE 5300 e MINNEAPOLIS, ,\\INr';ESOTA 55402 .. 612/339-8561 I I U] BQ ISSUE MAT TIME FISCAL lli!.!!!! 1,250,000 . RENVILLE CNTY ISO #2890 MNGO AID ANT 01 10:00 EHLERS 3,500,000 . FOLEY MN ISO #51 GO SCHL BLOG 02121 10:30 EHLERS 1,050,000 . SEYMOUR WI SWR SYSTEM REV 01/11 11 :00 EHLERS 670,000 . KERKHOVEN MN GO WATER REV 02116 11 :30 EHLERS 3,830,000 . ULEN-HITTERDAL ISO #914 MN GO 03/22 12:00 EVENSEN 1,850,000 . PALMYRA WI GO CORP PURP 02118 12:00 EHLERS 3,000,000 . LEMONT IL GO 02110 12:00 LEMONT 740,000 . ROYAL TON MN ISO #485 GO AID ANT 01 12:30 EHLERS 7,620,000 . JANESVILLE WI GO PROM NOTES 01110 1:00 NORENE 1,035,000 . LINCOLN CENTRAL CSD IA GO WARRANTS 01 1 :00 SPRINGSTED 5,000,000 . CEDAR RAPIDS CSD IA GO 01 1:00 EVENSEN !b!!!!! 930,000 . LAUDERDALE MN GO IMPROVEMENT 03/12 11:00 SPRINGSTED 17,900,000 ELMBROOK WI GO PROM NOTES 01/15 11:00 BAIRD 1,205,000 . PRARIE DU SAC WI GO CORP PURP 02116 11:00 EHLERS 1,610,000 . ST ANTHONY MN GO STORM SWR REV 02115 12:00 SPRINGSTED 950,000 . ST ANTHONY MN GO STATE AID 01/09 12:00 SPRINGSTED 1,045,000 . WEST MONONA CSD IA 01/09 2:00 PIPER 3,100,000 . CORALVILLE IA GO 01/14 2:00 PIPER ~ 3,320,000 . CASS LAKE-BENA ISD #115 GO SCHL BLDG 16/20 10:00 EHLERS 175,000,000 STATE OF MN GO 01/20 10:00 STATE 1,025,000 . GRAND MARAIS MN GO IMPROVEMENT 03/21 10:00 SPRINGSTED 1,040,000 . BIG LAKE EDA FACS LEASE REV 02116 11:00 EHLERS 6,855,000 . OREGON SCHL DIST WI GO SCHL BLDG 03/20 11 :00 EHLERS 3,300,000 . MISSISSIPPI BEND IA WARRANTS 01 100 SPRINGSTED 3,000,000 . ARNOLDS PARK IA GO CAPITAL LOAN 02120 2:00 PIPER 15-Jun 1,985,000 . CRYSTAL LAKE PARK DISTRICT IL GO L T 01116 12:00 EHLERS 19-Jun 9,515,000 CALEDONIA ISO #299 MN GO SCHL BLOG 02121 10:00 EHLERS 3,025,000 WAUNAKEE WI GO 02115 11:00 EHLERS 1,175,000 WAUNAKEE WI WTR & ELEC REV 01/20 11:00 EHLERS 22,500,000 ROCKFORD ISD#883 MN GO SCHL BLOG 02123 12:00 EHLERS 1,290,000 BUFFALO MN GO 02116 1:00 EHLERS 2,765,000 BUFFALO MN GO PARK 02116 1:00 EHLERS 20-Jun 465,000 CLAY CNTY MN GO WATERSHED IMPT 02116 10:00 EHLERS 6,795,000 GRAND CHUTE WI GO PROM NOTES 01/10 11:00 EHLERS 27 -Jun 5,870,000 AMES IA GO 01/12 10:00 EVENSEN 825,000 FARIBAUL T MN GO 02111 11:00 SPRINGSTED I II I I r] I I (j] I IJ I I I ~ q t ~'''''" ~,<<::.r'?W'fI' ..-.--'~ 7 ~ ,_ T,~ """''W\''I'' "!"" """ ",-~ "'P' ,- - ",,","" ..,...-". " .. '-"(1'"'~, ..... -'-""'~'" ,...,.~ ~';"-'.;'-'--- -'.....,.7.--.-',. - ,,',' -_-"~'___~,_"_~ '''.u .' .._. .... I It I-~- .~_<i.t~~~)~~> -1-~"":6 .%t\..; II 19 II r'tl \11 II IfI [il rf] ra - ~~-~- C" :1.---<",/1 ) jf%, '" - --?c ~ --',,,,"\ . .' i -~~~ ~ ~"'=- ~~9 9. ~ jF'l" . ~ " ~;.; .~ & CO.; ",'c,':--":':" ,_.\,,:.-~ "E<--:,,;:;:'~-~~;\;,-" 1 O-Ju! 2,385,000 2,050,000 3,300,000 1,290,000 2,915,000 1,645,000 605,000 3,015,000 4,830,000 27,650,000 430,000 550,000 525,000 11-Jul 1,370,000 5,000,000 2,850,000 110,000,000 1,865,000 3,000,000 3,730,000 1,260,000 8,000,000 1,500,000 1,100,000 2,000,000 1,430,000 1,075,000 12-Jul 3,000,000 601 SECO>;[J ,;VE,\UE Appendix B-1 i i\,i (~., ~ " ~ '~.<<l ~~ MAT TIME 01/08 01 f1 0 01/10 01 01/09 02111 01/14 02116 11/17 02120 03f17 02116 01/15 01/10 01/10 01/06 02119 01/10 01f03 02111 01/15 01 05 05 02 01 f20 02120 02120 : 'Tl-.: -J II J "'~ U iT E~ 3 eX; '" 1\11 N"! EA PO LI S, I\i!r'-J ,,,! r: SC; T-\ 5.s~! 02 , 33 9-S'=; Cll GOLDEN VALLEY MN GO BRAHAM MN ISO #314 GO AID ANT ROCHESTER MN GO SALES TAX REV ALBERT LEA MN ISO #241 GO OWATONNA MN GO MILACA MN ISO #912 GO STUARTEVANT WI WTR & SWR REV ST PAUL MN ISO #625 GO SCHL BLDG ST PAUL MN ISO #625 GO SCHL BLOG OMRO WI GO PROM NOTES WINONA MN ISO #8613 GO * HILLSBORO NO SCHL DIST ATWOOO-COSMOS-GROVE MN ISO #2396 GO NEW YORK MILLS MN ISO #553 GO PAYNESVILLE MN GO f- ~. ~"~.,., ",""" "">__.p~ _7'~ -'-" , 17-Jul 13,010,000 705,000 17,925,000 3,220,000 1,765,000 1,500,000 18-Jul 1,590,000 15,000,000 11,000,000 1,925,000 20-Jul 2,455,000 300,000 24-Jul 1,220,000 1,000,000 25-Jul 1,915,000 SQ ISSUE * WIINDIANHEAD TECH COLLEGE GO * BLACKHAWK TECH COLLEGE OIST WI * MORAINE PARK TECH COLLEGE DIST GO " ROCORRI MN ISO #750 GP " WESTERN WI TECH COLLEGE GO * MONTICELLO MN GO . NEW PRAGUE MN GO LIBRARY " NEW PRAGUE MN GO IMPROVEMENT " GENEVA PARK OIST IL GO DEFOREST WI SCHL DIST GO * DILLWORTH MN GO " WABASSO MN GO " EL Y IA GO . FITCHBURG WI GO PROM " STORY COUNTY IA GO JUSTICE CENTER " WAUKEE IA SCHL OIST GO MN PFA WTR POLLUTION CONTROL REV " ROCKFORD PARK IL GO * ROCKFORD PARK IL GO " BAXTER MN GO IMPROVEMENT " PARK RAPIDS MN GO ELK RIVER MN ISO #728 GO AID ANTICIPATION " DELAVAN WI BANS " DELAVAN WI WTR REV * ADA=BORUP MN ISO #2854 GO * URBANDALE tA GO COPS " OKOBOJIIA GO * ARNOLD PARK IA GO :1; t) FISCAL 10:00 SPRINGS TED 10:00 BAIRD 10:00 BAIRD 10:00 EHLERS 10:30 SPRINGSTED 11 :00 EHLERS 11 :00 SPRINGSTED 1100 SPRINGSTED 11:00 SPEER 11:00 EVENSEN 12:00 EHLERS 12:00 EVENSEN 2:00 PIPER 10:00 EHLERS 10:00 PIPER 10:00 PFM 1000 CITY 11:00 NORENE 11 :00 NORENE 11:00 SPRINGSTED 11 :00 JURAN 11 :00 EHLERS 12:00 EHLERS 12:00 EHLERS 12:00 EVENSEN 2:00 PIPER 200 PIPER 200 PIPER 1,1 I II II II rJJ -'^: -~.- ....." ~........."....,.....-~~-,. 02116 01 03 01 02111 1 01120 03/21 03/21 02110 01 01/07 01 01 01 1000 SPRINGSTED 10:00 EHLERS 10:30 SPRINGSTED 11:00 EHLERS 11:00 SPRINGSTED 12:00 EHLERS 10:00 EHLERS 11 :00 SPRINGSTED 11:00 SPRINGSTED 12:00 EHLERS 10:00 EHLERS 11:00 EVENSEN 10:00 EHLERS 11:00 EHLERS 10:00 EHLERS EHLERS ADVISOR THE Leaders in Public Finance Since 1955 June 2000 Legislative Changes Affecting Local Government The 2000 session of the Minnesota Legislature produced no large, sweeping changes in local government finance. The session resulted in numerous "tweaks" to existing statutes. These changes offer new opportunities and challenges for local government. This summary highlights the 2000 Session from a public finance perspective. A more complete session review can be found at our web site. Public Improvements Signs, posts and markers related to addressing for enhanced 911 telephone service can be financed as an improvement under Chapter 429. · Facilities for Internet access and other communications purposes can be financed as an improvement under Ch~1pter 429 subject to certain findings about the ability of such improvements to be provided by the private sector · A "reasonable estimate" of the total amount to be assessed and the methodology used to calculate individual assessments must be available at the Improvement Hearing. Tax Increment Financing · A!,~'lication of qualified housing district is expanded to alll)\\' TIF for single-family hnme ownership projects for "qu~llified purchasers". Mined underground space development is dropped from the TIF district definition. · Redevelopment districts can qualify using one or more of the specified statutory conditions. · The presence of certain tank facilities qualify parcels for a redewlopment district. · Amends the definition of a housing district to include a project or portion of a project that meets all of the qualifications of a housing district even if the parcels were not established as a housing district. Changes the definition of administrative expense to exclude land acquisition financed through bonds nor issued under 469.178 and developer and relocation See Legislative Change on Page 5 No Levy Limits in 2001! The Legislature failed to enact another one year extension of levy limits for cities and counties. The lack of levy limits is the classic two-edged sword. No levy limits creates the opportunity to fund services and improvements curtailed with a limited property tax levy. The use of this ability must be considered carefully. The reaction of cities and counties to this situation may be a factor in the property tax reform debate next year. Planning and creativity will help you to take advantage of this opportunity. Some ideas to consider include: . Capturing revenue from the termination of TIF districts, particularly the pre-1979 districts expiring in 2001. . Capturing the revenue from growth in overall tax capacity. . Reduction in debt levies that allow a shift to taxes for the General Fund. . Long term funding plans for equipment and improvements. We would be happy to help you explore possibilities for capturing levy authority without adding to the tax rate. I nside The Advisor . -;': i~.' ." , . .... \. ,..,,, What's an Abatement Meet Rebecca Kurtz Things you should know ::Ibout t::lX ::Ibatement. Ehlers ::Idds fin::lnci::ll ::Idvisor specializing in development projects ::Ind TIE Page 3 Page 2 Tell Your Development Story A strong ciry wle in development is essential. April 1,2001 is a key date for all pre-1979 TIF Districrs.. Page 4 Page 4 What's an Abatement and Why Does Everybody Want One? Local governments in Minnesota have had to deal with abatements for many years. Under the traditional meaning of this term, an abatement occurs when a property owner successfully appeals for a reduction in the estimated market value used for tax purposes on their property. This leads to a reduction in the taxes due on the property, often for several years. Over the past three years, a new meaning of abatement has emerged. State law now allows local governments to voluntarily grant "abatements" as an economic development incentive. A New Concept The law authorizing this new form of abatements (Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.1812 to 469.1815) was first adopted in 1997 and has been amended each year since. This law grew out of concerns by legislators about some aspects of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) , the most commonly used economic development tool in Minnesota. Concerns included: the lack of control that counties and school districts had over TIF, the cost to the state (through additional school aids) ofTIF, and the complexities of and restrictions associated with TIE The term "abatement" is somewhat of a misnomer in terms of how the new law works. Taxes are not reduced, as in the traditional meaning of abatements. For the typical abatement, the owner of the property pays property taxes in the same manner and amount as if there were no abatement. However, all or a part of the property taxes collected on the property may be paid back to the owner or diverted for another use, as determined by the abatement agreement(s). The abatement statutes also allow for the deferral of taxes. TIF V5. Abatement Abatements are often presented as an alternative to TIF as a tool for economic development. There are several key differences: . Approving Entities. TIF districts may be created by cities and various forms of development authorities or agencies. School districts and counties (without an HRA or EDA) , however, have no authority to create TIF districts or to prevent their creation, even though creation of a TIF district will affect school district and county taxes. With abatements, each taxing jurisdiction (school district, county, city or township) must individually approve the abatement of their portion of property taxes. · Required Findings. Before creating a TIF district, a municipality must recognize a variety of "findings" including the famous "but for" test (that the development would not occur but for tax increment assistance). The findings required to grant an abatement are generally less complex and restrictive. In some cases, an abatement may fall within the definition of a "business subsidy" under state law. In these cases, the use of tax abatement may also require the adoption of "criteria" for granting business subsidies and the adoption of a business subsidy agreement with the recipient of the assistance. . Approval Process. The process of documenting and approving an abatement agreement is generally less cumbersome and detailed than the process for a TIF district. The catch is that, in order to receive an abatement of substantially all property taxes, three government entities must approve separate abatement agreements. A public hearing must be held prior to approving the abatement. . Uses of Proceeds. While tax increment proceeds are subject to numerous restrictions on use, there are no restrictions on how or where abatement proceeds are used. . Time Limits. The time limits on the use of TIF vary according to the type of TIF district. If one of the political subdivisions declines to abate taxes, then the abatement may occur for up to 15 years. Otherwise, the maximum time limit is 10 years. . Amount of Abatement. The revenue from abatement differs from TIF in two important ways. (1) Tax increment comes from the value of new development, while Tax abatement may apply to both new and existing value. (2)There is no financial limit on a city's total tax increment. On the other hand, the total amount of abatement in any year for each jurisdiction is capped at the greater of 5% of the current levy or $100,000. . Bonds. Both TIF and abatement statutes authorize the issuance of general obligation bonds without an election and which are not subject to the debt limit. The maximum principal for abatement bonds cannot exceed the estimated sum of the abatements. For TIF bonds, not less than 20% of the debt service must be paid by tax increments. . Reporting Requirements. For TIF districts, the granting authority must submit detailed annual reports to the Office of the State Auditor. There are no required annual reports on abatements. · School District Taxes. Neither TIF nor an abatement will affect a school district's total revenue. However, most of the tax revenue that a school district "loses" to a TIF 2 .. ..,.-.. ._"'..... --- II d. " d through additional state aid. By contrast, Istnct IS ma e up . dd" 1 , ed by levymg a ItlOna abatement payments are reco\ er d h tire school district. As a property taxes sprea across teen result, abatements of school taxes will almost always ~ause . . . while TIF has very htde school dlstnct ta.xes to mcrease, impact on school district tax rates. R . III o 1 o ., identifiable development success stories? What specific steps For aSdid your city take to make this development happen? If public financial assistance was provided, what tools were used? III. Benefits Althou"h abatement lacks the total economic capacity of TIF, it '" offers some distinct advantages: Legislators, the public and the media need to understand what it really requires to undertake redevelopment and affordable .hOUSing. Until city officials decide they're not going to take it anymore, we will continue to be squeezed by criticism of subsidies, limitations on development tools, and unrealistic development objectives. II Simplicity. The process for the approval and use of al--:ltcment is far less complex than TIE . Collaboration. \Vith separate approval authority, the use if abatements encourages collaboration. It requires cities, counties and school districts [() jointly consider implications of the development project. -- . No April Fool fThe gradual sunset of pre-1979 TIF districts from taxes ~' payable 2001 to 2009 will have a signficant impact upon wlCcities' tax base and budgets. A few of the more subtle issues vatrevolving around the decertification of pre-1979 districts Befnclude: de'Most bond counsels have determined that cities without an<speciallegislation must spend the cash balances in the pre- ass1979 districts by April 1, 2001. wo th\:::ities with pre-1990 debt outstanding after April 1 , 2001, will p .need to decide if they will defease debt with all revenues dnreceived in 2001 or send tax increment back on an annual e\ . baSIs. ECI ~l~ecause commercial value in pre-1979 districts is not counted I 1n fiscal disparities contribution ratios, the amount of new tax m'base for a metropolitan city will not be $1 for $1 upon full or partial decertification. Rc SCtall us for any clarification on these issues. cel by III Uses. Abatement fits with projects not well suited to TIE . . Suggestions The interest in al:-atcments is groll"jng as more business owners and de\'e1lJpcrs become aware of abatements. What should you do if you arc approached with a request for an abatement? Here are some l'asic suggestions: II Develop a general business subsidy policy, establishing Purl"'sc, for which your organization may and may not con,iJer granting financi:ll illcenti\'cs to businesses II . . Develop specific criteria and policies for approval of abatements. Remember, tax abatement is a limited resource. It i< imj'<'rt:mt to consider if ;md how you will provide this assistance. Does the project meet a "but for" test? Can the abatement be targeted to achieve specific types of benefits to th,: cl1mmunity! Should the use be designed to meet other ~! :::d:uds? Setting policies and criteria allows you to make h.,t lISC of this tool. avoid setting unwanted precedents for (uture rl..'quc5ts and provide consistent criteria against which to evaluate requests. . . . . . Full). analy:e the impact of the proposed abatement on propertY laXe5. 1be impact on school property taxes is esped.1l1)o complex. School abatements are likely to increase taxes for other caxpayers. Your board or council should receivec:omplcteinfonnation before taking an action which "ill a&ea p~caxes. :l';:;$ Insist ~,. dc,~~t agreement which clearly defines the~thc property owners receiving aha ",. . If your TIF District was certified in: . 1997 - Have you complied with the three- year activity rule? II 1996 - The knock-down provisions apply after four years from the date of certification. . . 1995 - The five-year limit on expenditures applies after five years from the date of certification. . . . 3 Legislative Change from Page 5 Permanent Funding for Schools . Marginal Cost Pupil Units. The calculation of marginal cost pupil units was changed to the greater of (a) 100 percent of the current year's pupil units or (b) 77 percent of the current year's pupil units plus 23 percent of the prior year's pupil units. The change provides additional help to districts with declining enrollment while removing the current reduction for growing districts. . lncrease in basic revenue. Beginning in FY 2001 the general education formula allowance is increased from $3,925 to $3,964 per adjusted marginal cost pupil unit. The additional revenue must be reserved for staff development. . Special education aid growth factor. The growth factor used to calculate the state total special education-regular revenue is increase from 1.012 to 1.08 for FY 2002 and to 1.046 for FY 2003 and later. . Operating capital revenue. Beginning in FY 2001, districts will receive additional operating capital revenue equal to $5 per pupil unit. For FY 2000 and FY 2001, the additional revenue must be reserved for telecommunications access costs. . Telecommunications access revenue. Districts will receive a new categorical aid to fund telecommunications access. The aid for FY 2000 and FY 2001 will be based on the net eligible cost after reductions for e-rate revenue and the additional operating capital revenue ($5 per pupil unit). Other School Legislation . Capital Loan Districts - Bond Sale Limitations. Previous law prohibited districts with existing capital loans from issuing any bonds more than 20 years after they have received their capital loan; this has now been extended to 30 years. . Maximum Effort Capital Loans. Five districts received new capital loans to finance their building programs. However, the Department of CFL was directed to study other means of financing facilities, without capital loans, and was prohibited from accepting new loans until after the 2001 legislative session. . Education Agricultural Credit. The Legislature increased the education agricultural credit from 54 percent to 70 percent for agricultural homestead property up to $600,000 in market value and from 50 percent to 63 percent for other agricultural property or timberland. Resu Its of Bond Sales This edition of The Ehlers Advisor does not contain the results of recent bond sales in Minnesota. We encourage you to visit our website for bond sale information. Ehlers website contains two types of bond sale data. We maintain an annual summary of Minnesota bond issues. We also post the results of bond sales conducted by Ehlers. These two sources of information let you follow trends in the bond market. , Ehlers & Associates is committed to helping local governments better understand the issues that shape public finance. Roseville (MN) Office 3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, MN 55113-1105 651.697.8500 Brookfield (WI) Office 375 Bishops Way, Suite 225, Brookfield, WI 53005-6202 262.785.1520 Naperville (IL) Office 1001 East Chicago Avenue, Suite 135, Naperville, IL 60540 630.355.6100 On the Internet at www.ehlers-inc.com ~* ~. Bond Buyer's 20-Year G.O. Index _~__,_,~__,_~,~"-""-,,,,,~~''1''''''''''''''~'''-':~'''''''':''O:'^'' #' i....-----. 5.40% i_,,,_~?,L ...--"'" . I .",.___..,,,,-'" 4.90% ~- . ,~.-r'-' 1999 6.40% l 5.90% i,} r-:'~~"'~-';~~ *...J ."' , -T'--~'---'------'---'---'-: -r-r--,-'---'~--'--T'-~' 2000 6 I - I THEEHLERS ADVISOR _. I ~' If-, I I leaders in Public Finance Since 1955 .i~~ ~ 11rn~ Ii . '" - =<:;;N 1M ---......"'" rOR Al'.~~:~ ~~:~ IBUC I Y2K +1 Public Finance Trends & Issues ~a-;,.. ~fJ ~ ~. ,~ JJ ''IlI:1B IlJ 7: r .. '.' _ I ~ rlij t'~ 1"..'.1'.' \~ ,{ ~ Everywhere you turn, there is a reference to Y2K. The pendmg change to the next millennium is truly a momentous event and has demanded much attention in recent months. After the parties conclude, the lights stay on and the computers still work, we will come back to the on-going business of local government finance. ~""" ,. f; ,~ As Y2K fades to the background, the real future of public finance will come into focus. Here are some thoughts and observations about some trends and issues shaping public finance in 2000 and beyond. ~ '. \ r"lf. I.,li! '_,;I ~ :~ rOC.';' e-disclosure A fund~lInental change at the end of the 20th century is the growth of commerce on the Internet. Public finance is not immune to this powerful force. The Internet provides a wonderful vehicle for the business of public finance. Ehlers is proud to be leading the way onto the information superhighway. I ;' l..;~ I Bond issue disclosure is a natural fit for the Internet. Over the past two years, Ehlers has been providing an increasing amount of bond offering information on our I Fall 1999 website. The official statement for every Ehlers bond issue is available on the Internet. Internet disclosure now supplements the traditional mailing of printed documents. Electronic distribution of the official statement is becoming the norm. This trend brings several advantages: ./ Broaden the market. The Internet provides disclosure and bid information on your bond issue to the broadest possible market. It avoids missing a potential bidder that is not on mailing lists. ./ Control costs. The typical official statement costs $350 to print and distribute. E-disclosure will control printing and distribution costs for the issuer. ./ Enhance disclosure. Use of the Internet makes information available faster and to anyone that is interested. Investors in the secondary market have a new and convenient source of information. The Internet and Ehlers is making disclosure work in a way that is impossible with traditional means of communications. Internet Bidding The Internet is changing the way we conduct bond sales. In 2000, Ehlers will provide the option of Internet-based bidding for all bond sales. We will still offer more traditional bid options, but expect the popularity of Internet bidding to grow rapidly. The advantages of Internet bidding are clear. It is easy and convenient. Once registered as a bidder with appropriate good faith security, all a bidder needs to do is call up Ehlers bond sale web page and enter the data for a bid. It is accurate. Ehlers bid program checks the true See Trends & Issues on Page 5 Inside The Advisor '-- ;~~1~(15 I\fll t.~ ,'1:'; :t.;; ....rg."" ,,' (" Minnesota Bond Sales Sale re"ul t" for bonds sold in J line through September. Are You Ready? Insights on preparing for the eventual State Auditor's re\'iew of tax increment financing in your city, r:; r~ Page 2 Page 6 2000 TIF Seminar Information on the annual Publicorp seminar on tax increment financing, Timely Payments Tips on managing debt service payments with DTC Page 6 Page 6 , "J_~_'t,~~,:._._ _T__~, ~!~', .,~ ,.",,:~,~"'- ~'""f'%' ...;....,""?'~"~~'~~~','\_~~''''_1',~...':'.,,.""''T-'''';.~'~....:"''''.,.-0',:".','0'"'''",''''''-".,,:---,. --~C'''''llI''..;--"",-.......,.,~ """':'I<<'j.'..._.~_,!",~",,~ I rJ ~ NET . ISSUER DATE ISSUE AMOUNT DUE RATE RATING Braham 05/03/99 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds 275,000 2001-2020 530% NR Edina 05/03/99 G.O. Utilities Revenue Bonds 3,600,000 2000-2009 4.12% Aa I/AA Edina 05/03/99 G.O. Refunding Bonds 3,270,000 2003-2013 434% Aa 11 AA r. Morristown 05/03/99 G.O. Refunding Bonds 265,000 2000-2011 4.75% NR Sherburne County 05/04/99 G.O. Jail Bonds 5,065,000 2001-2006 4.03% A+ Houston HRA 05/1 0/99 Corporate Purpose Rev. Refunding Bonds 535,000 2000-2010 4.75% NR Nicollet County 05/1 0/99 G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds 4,000,000 2001-2014 4.54% AMBAC Perham EDA 05/10/99 Public Project Lease Revenue Bonds 445,000 2001-2015 5.22% NR . Ramsey County 05/10/99 G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds 5,485,000 2000-2019 4.54% Aaa/AA+ ISD 2190 (Yellow Medicine East) 05/10/99 G.O. Refunding Bonds 325,000 2000-2003 4.25% NR Jordan 05/17/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 1,330,000 2001-2020 5.20% NR Little Falls 05/17/99 G.O. Perm. Imp. Revolving Fund Bonds 885,000 2001-2014 5.14% Baa3 [II Maple Grove 05/17/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 5,580,000 2001-2020 4.88% Aa2 Maple Grove 05/17/99 G.O. Road Reconstruction Bonds 1,010,000 2001-2019 4.94% Aa2 Maple Grove 05/17/99 Taxable G.O. Tax Increment Bonds 685,000 2002-2009 6.46% Aa2 St. Louis Park 05/17/99 G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds 2,500,000 2002-2011 4.41% Aal Andover 05/18/99 G.O. Equipment Certificates 1,050,000 2001-2004 4.16% A [. Andover 05/18/99 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds 1,500,000 2001-2012 4.58% A ISD 786 (Bertha-Hewitt) 05/18/99 G.O. School Building Bonds 4,625,000 2001-2020 4.84% Aal Isanti 05/18/99 G.O. Sewer Revenue Bonds 780,000 2000-2019 5.11 % NR Isanti 05/18/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 425,000 2001-2015 5.01% NR ISD 146 (Barnesville) 05/20/99 G.O. Capital Facilities Bonds 750,000 2000-2009 4.46% Aal . Zumbrota 05/20/99 G.O. Perm. Imp. Revolving Fund Bonds 635,000 2001-2015 4.89% NR Chatfield 05/24/99 G.O. Perm. Imp. Revolving Fund Bonds 435,000 2001-2015 4.93% NR ISD 194 (Lakeville) OS/25/99 Taxable G.O. School Building Bonds 600,000 1999 9.00% NR Minneapolis Special SD 1 OS/25/99 G.O. Bonds 49,000,000 2001-2014 4.70% Aa3/AA+ ISD 2758 (Redwood Falls) OS/25/99 G.O. Building Bonds 5,500,000 2004-2021 4.84% Aal . Cambridge 05/26/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 355,000 2001-2010 6.58% NR Falcon Heights 05/26/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 1,580,000 2001-2010 4.40% Al Harris 05/26/99 Certificates of Participation 435,000 2001-2020 5.44% NR Lake Elmo 06/01/99 G.O. Temporary Improvement Bonds 525,000 2002 4.28% NR Long Lake 06/01199 G.O. Improvement Bonds 820,000 2001-2015 4.97% NR ~ Lyon County 06/01/99 G.O. Drainage Bonds 675.000 2001-2015 4.89% NR Duluth 06/03/99 G.O. Bonds 6,855,000 2001-2015 4.83% FGIC Duluth 06/03/99 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds 3,900,000 2001-2015 4.86% FGIC Brandon 06/07/99 G.O. Sewer Revenue Bonds 360,000 2001-2019 5.28% NR . Chaska EDA 06/07/99 School Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds 9,450,000 1999-2019 5.50% Baa2 ISD 831 (Forest Lake) 06/07/09 G.O. Aid Anticipation Certificates 4,530,000 2000 3.62% NR Slayton 06/07/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 350,000 2001-2010 4.84% NR Blue Earth County 06/08/99 G.O. Drainage Ditch Bonds 210,000 2001-2010 4.74% Al Redwood Falls 06/08/99 G.O. Bonds 900,000 2001-2026 5.23% A3 . St. Michael 06/08/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 6,435,000 2002-2021 5.07% MBIA Watertown 06/08/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 1,580,000 2001-2015 5.13% NR Yellow Medicine County 06/08/99 G.O. Jail & Courthouse Bonds 3,330,000 2002-2022 5.15% FSA Alexandria Lake Area Sanitary District 06/09/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 2,530,000 2000-2015 4.52% A3 Audubon EDA 06/14/99 Housing Development Bonds 660,000 2002-2029 5.49% NR ISD 378 (Dawson-Boyd) 06/14/99 G.O. School Building Bonds 2,430,000 2002-2021 5.17% Aal Ostego 06/14/99 G.O. Sewer & Water Revenue Bonds 2,595,000 2006-2020 5.31% FSA Ostego 06/14/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 1,800,000 2000-2009 4.75% FSA Rosemount 06/14/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 3,715,000 2001-2011 4.69% MBIA Hanska EDA 06/15/99 G.O. Housing Development Rev. Bonds 555,000 2002-2029 5.54% NR Hennepin County 06/15/99 G.O. Bonds 40,000,000 2000-2019 5.00% Aaa/AANAAA Minnesota Public Facilities 06/15/99 Drinking Water Revenue Bonds 21,500,000 2000-2019 5.11% AM ISD 682 (Roseau) 06/16/99 G.O. School Building Bonds 4,500,000 2013-2025 5.38% Aal Stockton 06/1 7/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 710,000 2001-2015 5.11% NR Aitkin 06/21199 G.O. Water & Sewer Bonds 375,000 2001-2020 5.38% NR Breckenridge 06/21/99 G.O. Sewer Revenue Bonds 935,000 2001-2014 5.11% Baal Canby 06/21199 G.O. Improvement Bonds 560,000 2001-2014 5.17% NR Farmington 06/21/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 1,775,000 2000-2014 5.00% FSA Farmington 06/21199 G.O. Equipment Certificates 490,000 2001-2004 4.69% Baal Hawley 06/21/99 G.O. Sewer Revenue Bonds 805,000 2001-2017 5.32% NR Litchfield 06/21/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 1,095,000 2001-2015 5.02% FSA Winona 06/21199 G.O. Sales Tax Revenue Bonds 4,070,000 2000-2005 4.48% Aa2 Wadena 06/22/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 3,670,000 2001-2015 5.05% AMBAC Wadena 06/22/99 Electric Utility Revenue Bonds 1,000,000 2001-2010 5.01% Baa3 White Bear Lake 06/22/99 G.O. Marina Bonds 1,850,000 2001-2015 5.02% Aa3 White Bear Lake 06/22/99 G.O. Refunding Bonds 1,045,000 2000-2006 4.52% Aa3 2 . NET DATE ISSUE AMOUNT DUE RATE RATING ISSUER ~ Minneapolis 06/23/99 G.O. Various Purpose Bonds es 1,130,000 2000 4.03% NR Minneapolis 06/23/99 G.O. Bonds Tax Increment Bonds es 1,185,000 2000 4.08% NR Elk River 06/28/99 G.O. Bonds ds 3,970,000 2000-2015 5.17% AMBAC Frazee 06/28/99 G.O. Water & Sewer Revenue Bond: 1,800,000 2000-2008 4.89% A3 Orono 06/28/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds it. Bonds 4,000,000 2001 4.62% NR . Spring Lake 06/28/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds es 2,105,000 2000 3.97% NR Spring Lake 06/28/99 G.O. Temporary Improvement Bon%s 2,250,000 2000 3.95% NR Kenyon 06/29/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds es 700,000 2000 4.11% NR New Brighton 06/29/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds es 2,965,000 2000 3.89% NR . New Brighton 06/29/99 G.O. Storm Water Utility Revenue B 1,050,000 2001-2010 4.88% Aal Warren 06/29/99 G.O. Loan Anticipation Bonds 9S 1,250,000 2000 3.99% NR ISD 577 (Willow River) 06/29/99 G.O. School Building Bonds nd Bonds 8,950,000 2001-2011 4.88% AA- Buffalo 07/06/99 G.O. Sewer & Water Revenue Bondids 2,135,000 2002-2009 6.87% AA- Buffalo 07/06/99 G.O. Refunding Bonds 410,000 2001-2018 5.65% Baa3 II Crosslake 07/06/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds lands 700,000 2001-2008 4.98% Baa3 Golden Valley 07/06/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds lands 1,040,000 2001-2015 5.24% A2 Hasilngs 07/06/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 4,350,000 2001-2011 4.96% MBIA Northfleld 07/06/99 Taxable G.O. Tax Increment Bondsonds 1,725,000 2002-2006 4.67% A3 Northfield 07/06/99 Taxable G.O. Tax Increment Bonds Ig Bonds 680,000 2002-2008 4.83% A3 It Northfield 07/06/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds onds 980,000 2000-2010 5.08% A3 Rockford 07/06/99 G.O. Perm. Imp. Revolving Fund Bo 276,000 2001-2015 5.85% NR Spring Grove 07/06/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 1,725,000 2002-2016 5.20% Al Mabel 07/08/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 1,460,000 2001-2015 5.21% Aal ISD 2397 (LeSueur. Henderson) 07/12/99 G.O. Aid Anticipation Certificates 1,335,000 2001-2004 4.47% A2 . North Branch 07/12/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 2,390,000 2001-2014 5.08% FGIC ISD 750 (Rocori) 07/12/99 G.O. Aid Anticipation Certificates 610,000 2001-2020 5.43% A2 Cottonwood County 07/13/99 G.O. Landfill Bonds 845,000 2001-2015 5.39% NR Faribault 07/13/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds Ids 85,000 2001-2010 6.75% NR Farlbault 07/13/99 G.O. Building Bonds 2,100,000 2000-2010 Baal . Faribault 07/13/99 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds 1,115,000 2001-2010 4.87% A3 Mahnomen County 07/13/99 G.O. Nursing Home Revenue Bonds 900,000 2000 Waverly 07/13/99 G.O. Water & Sewer Revenue Bond! 5,720,000 2001-2012 4.92% Al Metropolitan Council 07/14/99 G.O. Sewer Bonds 1,1 00,000 2001-2019 532% Aal Austin 07/19/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 3,660,000 2001-2020 5.11% NR . ISD 271 (Bloomington) 07/19/99 G.O. School Building Bonds 680,000 2000-2020 5.79% NR ISD 299 (Caledonia) 07/19/99 G.O. Aid Anticipation Certificates I Bonds 725,000 2001-2010 5.29% NR CrG,' Wing County HRA 07/19/99 Detention Facility Lease Revenue Be 700,000 2002-2015 5.47% NR Y-ia.:onia 07/19/99 G.O. Sewer Revenue Bonds I Bonds 585,000 2003-2015 5.38% NR . Albertville 07/20/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds I Bonds 555,000 2004-2015 5.41% NR Albertville EDA 07/20/99 Public Facility Lease Revenue Bondi 350,000 2006-2010 521% NR HClpl-'ins 07/20/99 G.O. Storm Sewer Revenue Bonds 395,000 2002-2016 5.49% NR Hcpkins 07/20/99 G.O. Perm. Imp. Revolving Fund Bo 1,280,000 2003 4.43% Aal HopkinS 07/20/99 Taxable G.O. Improvement Area BOIs 1,000,000 2000 4.01% NR . New Ulm 07/20/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 1,890,000 2002-2020 521% A3 :::~...: Ld1\i: Faiis 07;20/99 G.O. Water & Sewer Revenue Bond! 925,000 2001-2013 5.22% A3 Madison EDA 07/21/99 G.O. Housing Development Bonds 3,525,000 2000-2004 5.37% A Willmar 07/21/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 4,395,000 2002-2011 4.81% MBIA Willmar 07/21/99 Municipal Utility Revenue Bonds js 855,000 2001-2015 5.21% A2 . ISO 2396 (ACGC) 07/26/99 G.O. Aid Anticipation Certificates 5,670,000 2001-2020 5.37% Aa1 ISD 7! 6 (Belle PlaineJ 07/26/99 G.O. Aid Anticipation Certificates 2,890,000 2001-2012 4.80% Aal ISD 2534 (BOLD) 07/26/99 G.O. Aid Anticipation Certificates 940,000 2002-2015 5.16% Aa2 Forest Lake 07/26/99 G.O. Water & Sewer Utility Rev. Bar 692,296.80 2013-2023 5.68% Aa2 Fores: Lake (Township) 07/26/99 G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds 4,260,000 2002-2015 4.95% MBIA . Inver Grove Heights 07/26/99 G.O. Refunding Bonds 1,340,000 2000-2014 519% AMBAC Mantc,r"ille 07/26/99 G.O. Refunding Bonds Bonds 1,320,000 2001-2009 4.76% Aaa/AA + D~J ~'-", 07/27/99 G.O. Temporary Improvement Bond~s 1,020,000 2001-2009 4.76% Aaa/AA+ He'lni~g 07/29/99 G.O. Public Utility Revenue Bonds 340,000 2002-2028 Pe';':~ 07/29/99 Gas Utility Revenue Bonds 480,000 2002-2016 5.55% NR . Marshall County 08/03/99 Certificates of Participation 3,500,000 2000 ~,'i;Jrescta 08/03/99 G.O. State Various Purpose Bonds ~ds 480,000 1 Day 9.00% NR NeN Germany 08/03/99 G.O. Bonds 1,160,000 2001-2010 4.85% Al Owatonna 08/03/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 415,000 2000-2004 452% Al I Pequot Lakes 08/03/99 G.O. Loan Anticipation Bonds js 186,000 2001-2007 5.10% NR ISD 883 (Rockford) 08/05/99 G.O. Capital Facilities Bonds 14,280,000 2001-2015 5.31% Aa2/AA ISD 695 (Chisholm) 08/09/99 G.O. Aid Anticipation Certificates 835,000 2001-2016 A3 Cross lake 08/09/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds nds 575,000 2002-2011 5.08% A3 ISD 51 (Foley) 08/09/99 G.O. Aid Anticipation Certificates l.700,000 2001-2011 5.13% A3 I Sartell 08/09/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds 750,000 2002-2021 6.06% Baal ISD 177 (Windom) 08/09/99 G.O. Aid Anticipation Certificates 6,510,000 2002-2011 5.09% Aal Becker County 08/10/99 G.O. Courthouse Bonds Is 11,150,000 2002-2011 7.07% Aal ISD 194 (Lakeville) 08/10/99 G.O. Aid Anticipation Certificates 15,000,000 2001-2020 5.63% Aal/AA+ ISD 74 j (Paynesville) 08/10/99 G.O. Aid Anticipation Certificates 420,000 2001-2015 5.21% A3 I ISD 203 (r-;ayfield) 08/11/99 G.O. Aid Anticipation Certificates 10,000,000 2005-2023 5.70% MBIA ISD 5~9 (Perham) 08/11/99 G.O. Aid Anticipation Certificates Bon ds 470,000 2001-2010 5.13% A2 ISD 214~ (Chisago Lakes) 08/12/99 G.O. Aid Anticipation Certificates 790,000 2002-2016 7.70% A2 ISD 482 (Little Falls) 08/12/99 G.O. Aid Anticipation Certificates Princeton 08/12/99 G.O. Improvement Bonds I ISD 241 (Albert Lea) 08/16/99 G.O. Aid Anticipation Certificates Glencoe 08/16/99 G.O. Swimming Pool Bonds Wyoming 08/16/99 G.O. Bonds Wyoming 08/16/99 Taxable G.O. Tax Increment Bonds I 3 ~ .rcw~;,~ $ I' ""I'~1fM JL~:~~" Are You Ready? ~ The State Auditor's office (OSA) is continually taking a more aggressive position on the auditing of tax increment financing districts. It is very important that cities be prepared in the event of such an audit. This means a city needs to have records and documents organized and easily accessible, and in such a manner to clearly demonstrate compliance with statutory requirements. Not being prepared can result in the following: ..I Cities have had trouble meeting the 60-day statutory response time for OSA findings of non- compliance. ..I It may be necessary to hire extra help, pay overtime, and hire outside consultants, attorneys and auditors to assist with the response. ..I The elected officials may have concerns over a lack of preparation for an OSA audit. ..I The OSA may report unnecessary non-compliance issues due to lack of proper documentation and incomplete records. This prolongs the time necessary to resolve the audit as the additional documents are located, submitted to and reviewed by OSA. To ensure that you have prepared for rhe Auditor's Office, Ehlers is recommending that clients undertake a pre-audit process. The work could be completed by either Ehlers and/or local staff. To date, Ehlers has completed such a process for a number of cities. Regardless of the approach, it is very important to review the proper information and perform the necessary steps to prepare for the audit. The complexity of TIF produces many questions. The ever changing TIF law and OSA requirements add to the complexityofTIF administration and compliance. Being prepared for the dreaded audit can eliminate some of the pressure that accompanies an OSA audit. Publicorp Inc. - Seminar ,,' J I (" I Stage 1 TIF Seminar I Comedy, Tragedy, ~ystery Tax Increment Financing 2000 February 3 and 4, 2000 Stage 2 Better Moody's Rating Dianne Golub and Linda Hird Lipnick of Moody's Investors Service, together with Ehlers' staff, will lead a three hour session on the bond rating process on Thursday morning. Participants will be asked to serve as a rating committee and rate municipal bond issues. City, county, and school district staff will enjoy the opportunity to ask questions of Moody's influential staff in the Midwest Region. I I I I For registration information call Robin Caufman at 651.697.8531 or online at www.ehlers-inc.com I Timely Payments I Believe it or not, The Depository Trust Company (DTC) receives only 91 % of all debt service payments on time. If you are acting as your own paying agent on bond issues, DTC must receive your principal and interest payments on the due date and no later than 2:30 p.m. (E.T). A missed deadline puts your bondholders at risk of not being paid promptly. If you are using a bank as a paying agent their deadline times will be earlier. Please contact Ehlers or your paying agent with any questions. More information is available at DTC's website www.dtc.org. I 6 MEMO DATE: July 21,2000 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE Centennial Lakes Police Department 2001 Budget ............................................................................ Included in your packet is a draft copy of a proposed 2001 budget for the Centennial Lakes Police Department. This budget was requested at the joint meeting that was held on June 22nd at Lexington City Hall. This is for informational and discussion purposes only. The Police Department and Police Commission are not supporting this proposed budget. Chief of Police Joel D. Heckman Centennial Lakes Police Department 200 Civic Heights Circle Circle Pines MN 55014 763-784-2501 Date: July 14, 2000 To: Centerville, Circle Pines, fu'1d Lexington City Admitllstrators Re: 2001 Budget spreadsheet cc: Commission/file Attached please find spreadsheet requested at the Tri-City Council/Commission Meeting held on June 22, 2000. Shown are 1999 actual expenditures, 2000 budget with actual expenditures through June 2000, and the 200 I "targeted" budget. In order to achieve the 2001 targeted budget, one officer has been deleted from the force. Please copy to your respective mayor and council as requested. Thank you. CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPARTMENT . BUDGET PROJECTION , i 1 i 1999 ! I Thru ; i 2000 I 2001 i' II i I I i i ACTUAL . . June-DO : i BUDGET i BUDGET 1 I REVENUE i! . I 1 I Ii I. I . I Circle Pines Contract I j 538,153: 1 263,170, I 526,341 j : Lexington Contract I! 285,551 · i 164,192: i 328,384: ! Centerville Contract i i 274,568:1 156,733i I 313,4661 ! AMOUNT INTENDED PER TRI-CITY AGREEMENT I 1,098,272! i 584,095: I 1,168,1911 1 ,241 ,583 Grants-Small Communitites Grant II 7,5001 I 0' i I' I I Ii Grants-State Snowmobile I' 011 , i I , , i; ! . Grants-Federal COP i! 117,54211 28,125i 1 75,00011 37,500 Grants-New COP ! I 0: I 28,125: i 37,5001 ~ 25,000 State Reimbursement-Vests 1 ! 3,4451 I 0 011 ! i State Reimbursements i i 9,598! i 2,2031, 5,0001 I 5,000 i' , ! Dare Funds-Centennial School/Donations i! 4,5741 ! 5,240: I 4,5001 ! 5,000 ! i Copies/Report Records/Notary II 1,403; I 701 i I 1,500 ! 2,000 Interest on Investments Ii 74111 7601 ! 2001 I 1,000 Commission Salary Reimb i i 2,400 II 1,680: ! 4,8001. 7,200 Special Event Reimb i I 7,253: ! 4611 I 2,000: . 2,000 Miscellaneous ie: Ins refunds 1 ! 7,4331 1 19,716 1,500' 2,000 Vehicle & Equipment Sales ; i 1,0931 I 655 0: I 10,000 Forfeitures i I 4,424 i i 6,2231 i 2,0001, 3,600 Donations-Fire Relief i! 2,000' i 0 2001 : 200 Donations-Lions I. 2,700 I 1 01' 2,000i' 2,000 I' , ' >nations-Crime Prevention ' , o I ; . i i , . . i i! . ! . I! TOTAL REVENUE : ' 1,270,378' . 677,984 1,304,391, 1,344,083 , ! ' I Ii i: II . ! i i I I: i i I , I 1999 Thru II 200( i I I ACTUAL June-OO i I BUDG ' I I, II II EXPENDITURES II I I I II Salaries-Full-Time Ii 788,724i 389,7771 I 826, Salaries-Overtime I I 29,748; I 13,9751 i 35, I I ; I Salaries-Part- Time II 28,608; I 15,41011 32, Commission Salaries , I 2,400 2,200; ! 4, Ii i 1 I I Ii I' Ii i r II PERA ! i 81,682 I 36,0261 : 78,i ; I FICA , I 6,171: i 3,281 i I 6,E I I Medicare I I 8,369, : 4,22911 10,1 r! Health/Life/Disability/Dentallnsurance i! 70,583 i 37,3761 : 77,3 I I Re-employment Insurance : I 1 ,455 o ! I, , I Worker's Compensation Insurance i i 16,454 . 16,0021 I 15,5 Workers Compensation Premium ii i I i I I Ii ; i ! ! r I: i' i I , Ii Office/Coping/Computer Supplies Ii 4,448 3,040' i 5,OC i i ! i Photo Copier supplies, paper, drums, toner , Consumables Ii , ; r: ! i i i ' I Computer Supplies, Hardware upgrade ' I , : ' i i I r i i i , I r i , ! I Cleaning-Supplies I, 340 821 I 501 I' , Cleaning supplies ; I ! , i: Cleaning equipment i I , ' I i, Ii ' , ! i! Printed Forms i, 2,587 439 2,00C , ~ I Checks, Envelopes, Letterhead, Ii Ii state/county forms, business cards I! Ii , r ; I ! I Ii Printed Forms i i 0, " 0' ! 0 ! [ Forms, Letterhead, Envelopes, Business Ii ; i ; , Cards for Tri-City start up , ; , i , I ' ! ! i i i I I I I Intoxilyzer Supplies : I 591 75[ i 600 Intoxilyzer Supplies i! : i Ii . i i , I i i , ' ! I i Ii , ; Fuel I! 16,003 i 6,523: i 18,000 : Vehicle Fuel I I ; . i i! , , Ii , ! i ' I , Oil & Lubricants I. 0 ; 0 200 Oil & lubs i I I: I I, , I , , ; ! I! Anti-freeze & fluids i I ! : I I TV & Snowmobile Supplies ATV & snowmobile gas, oil Amunition & Fire Arm Supplies Ammunition Cleaning supplies, targets Muffs, glasses, lock Medical/Fire Supplies Medical supplies Fire extinguishers Vaccinations etc Investigation Supplies Investigative supplies Photographic supplies/processing Uniforms Officer uniforms PT Uniforms Civilian Uniforms New Employee Reserves/Explorers Protective Vests Uniforms New Badges & Patches for Start-up of Tri-City Crime Prevention Supplies SUDplies School Safety Auditing & Accounting Services Accounting Service Auditing Legal Fees Commission legal counsel i I , I I! i i , , , , ! 1999 ACTUAL 836 , ! I , 4,057 I ! I , , , , , . ! : i: 'i i i ! i 1 ,203i i i i : I : i , , Ii , I II . , i' II 805 I i ; i , , i I Ii i , ' ! ! 1 3, 1441 i i I : I , I I i' I, i! , , . I: : . i I 11 , I 1 ! II 5291[ : i Ii I : 1 7,696 i I ; I , I . , i! 626: I , , i Thru I i 2000 June-OO : I BUDGET : i I I 011 I I I! i I 271 i I I I I, I! I I I! , , , ! i 108; : I! i 1 . I i I i I Ii 68; ~ i i : , i' ; i 747: i, , , Ii i: : ' i oj 0, i , , , 81, i , . , i I i! I: I i; II 4,812 i I : I , I , I Ii ; i I 0, , , : , ' 300 3,000 i I I 1,500 ! : 1,200: I; : I i I II : I 11,000, i i: II I! ! I I I , I : i i i 0, , , 1,0001, 8,000 i 5,000'- I , ' . I 2001 I BUDGET i I 300 I 3,000 1,500 . 1,200 15,000 o 1,000 I: i: i I , I 9,000 ! ! 1 : 5,000 I 1999 i I Thru I 2000 i 2001 I i i i . I I I ACTUAL II June-OO I BUDGET I BUDGET I I i I I i I I I I ~rsonnel Testing i 1,030: i 758 I 2,000 i 2,500 Pre-employment testing ! ! i i ! i I ! ' ' , i i , II Drug Screening I , II ! I Psychological testing I i i ; i i i I I i i ' I Medical/Physicals I : i II I I ' I : I II I Ii i i Labor Relations I 0: i 01 i 1,500: i 1,500 Labor Consultant II Ii ' , I i' I i i I I i i I Contract Typing ! 4001 ! 480 I 9601 i 960 , Commission Minutes Ii ! I I i I II ' i I i I ! ! , I I I: Telephone ! I 6,294: I 2,359 i 6,0001 i 6,000 US West/ATT ' i Ii : 1, i: I ~ " . I i: Airtouch Celular I , , i i i , I , I! Minn Comm Paging , , : ! ! ! ' , : I ! ~ I Postage , , 1,377' 438 1,500, I 1,500 I I I! , Ii Postage/UPS I' , II ' I I , II i! i I I! i: avellTraining ! i 1 0,441 : I 2,6921 ] 10,000!: 12,000 j: I' I! 1 I i I Training & Conference Tuition I . ! , ' ' I i, I . ! I I Meals, Lodging & Mileage i I ' , Computer Training I: ! ! i i I I , : I Other Reimbursements (Petty Cash) : ' I! I ! ! I ! ! i I II : I' : i ! I , II Printing & Publishing , , 1821 i 252, 1 2501 i 300 I I II Notices, Auctions, Personnel i' ! I I I, : . I I I : ! I I Ii I , i I I i ! i ! : , I: ! i i! , Property/Liability Insurance ! 21,63511 21,557 i I 25,000 i I 28,000 i I Professional Liability, Property, Vehicles Ii , ! i, i I I Building I , , ! , , ' : , i i Vehicle Insurance (Donated Vehicles) Ii , I I i! ] 1 I I i I I! ! ! Utilities I 1,4451 563: i 2,200, i 2,400 i i ~ i , Ii CP Utilities I i , Anoka Electric i i I ! , i I I Lexington Office Area II ! : I I I i I , , I I CJRS Access ! I 1,560 390: 1,600 1,800 i i I ! ,.,~ T Access i I 2,070 540: 2,520 i 2,800 I uilding/Grounds Maintenance Grounds Maintenance Building Maintenance Snow Removal Floor Care Office/software Maintenance Office Equipment Repairs Network support Anoka County Connection Office Equip Maintenance Contracts Computer, printers, typewriters Copier LOR EOP-Network MDT Vehicle Repair & Maintenance Vehicle Repairs & Parts Repair Labor Car Wash Tires & Tire Repair Keys & Misc Repairs Equipment Repair & Maintenance Police Equipment Repair Weapons Repair & Maintenance Radar Repairs Radar Recertificaion/Calibrartion Building Lease Building Rent-CP Building Rent-Lex Vehicle Lease Vehicle Lease Telephone Lease Te!ephone Lease ipment Lease/Purchase I Anoka County Recards System i: 1999 ACTUAL ! i I, I' I I i 1,931 i ; , ; ! ! 1,864: I : , i I 4,075 : ; , Ii i! I: , ' : , , , , , : 8,477: ! , , . . : i , , 343 , I j! , ' ; i i ! i : ! 9,723 ' i; I ! - ! : 35,616:1 I: ; : ; ; 106! i : ! : : ! i I ! , i! , I , ; 1 ' i i : i , i i I ,I : ! , ! , I I, ! I I, , , , ! : Ii . i i! : i , ' i I i : i , 1 I, I , I , , : I ; 1 ! ! : ! : II , o , i Thru June-OO i 2000 ' : 2001 r BUDGET;: BUDGET ! ! ! ! 6131 1 ! I , I i I i: I! [ I i i 370 ! i I Ii 966:1 i I I' ! , I iT i I , I I, I I 3,3741 j II , , i I ! i i i I I I : I 77, i i I: I I ! 5,164 ; ! ' 22,007 i 916: : 2,683' II 2,050' ' 500 ! , 5,000, I ! I , 1 ; 10,000 ' 550; , 10,500 , 35,616 , 2,400 22,000 2,200 , , : : 2,000 5,000 10,000 : , 800 , 11,000 48,000 o 22,000 I! 1999 i i Thru i 2000 . : 2001 I 1 . I ACTUAL : ! June-OO ! BUDGET -:[ BUDGET : : I I . . II I i: Ii ! I ues I' 300! I 5851 600, i 700 ! I i i I 1 i MN/Anoka Chiefs/IACP I' : i i I ! 1 : I , I I i! Dare/MALEFI 1 i i' ! I: II ': i 1 i ! i Subscriptions & Books ! i 292, : 472: ! 500' j 500 Subscriptions & Legal Publications I' j! 1 I : I , i 1 ' ' , I : 1 Ii ; I ! : ,I Ii I I Miscellaneous i! 488! 1 4101 I 5001 i 1,000 . , I! Commission Expenses IE. Plaques , i 1 Flowers : 1 : i i i i I II 1 : I: i ! i , , i i: Dare Expenses . : 5,534: ! 4,087' ! 5,0001 i 5,000 i i 1 : , i: Ii , i I I ' , Vehicle Setup & Trim ' I 7,3381 i 0] , 01 i 7,000 I I: I New Vehicle Set-up & Trim 1 i I I: i! , ' . I , i i I ,I ! ' Equipment , . 3,448, I 14,596: ! 8,000 3,000 Radar : I i i ! I I i : 1 , Rifle : i ; : i I ' ! I' ! 1 MDT ! . ! i 1 i I i ! , ' i Cage, Light Bar,V-con : ' I I I I Vehicles(Donated) , I. , I I. ! i , I , , ' Copier I' , 1 I i! : I i I CONTINGENCY FUNDS 1 i ! i , I 3,141 i i 2,558 ! , , ADDITIONS: I' i I ill 1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUILDING FUND : ! : i 011 0 , , : i ' ! ! i I : , i! Centennial Lakes PO Costs ' I I: Ii 0 : ' , Anoka Co Radio Upgrades : ! " i i 3,000 I , Contingency (Additional) , : . 0 , : ! I : 0 Centerville Sub-Station i i j 1 , . ! i : Furniture : : ! , 0 , , ! ! ' ! i TOTAL EXPENDITURES ! ! 1,213,028! : 620,871 ! 1,304,391 i i 1,344,083 CHANGE IN BUDGET 2000-2001 : 1 . ! ! . i i : ! Amount to Be Provided -: I 0' I 0 ! 1 , MEMO DATE: July 21,2000 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: JimMarch RE : Goetz Well Request ............................................................................ I met with Joe Goetz to discuss an issue he has with City water. Joe showed me some of their plant stock that has been stunted by the chlorine in the City water. It appeared that some plants are more susceptible to the chlorine and some are more tolerant. Joe has written a letter asking permission to install a private well solely for the irrigation of plant stock. The building would continue to be connected to City water. I discussed this issue with City Engineer Tom Peterson and he did not see a problem with this request. Goetz Landscape & Irrigation, Inc. Goetz Garden Center 2030 Main Street Centerville, Minnesota 55038 Voice: 651/426-2136 Fax: 651/426-2451 Minnesota Nursery & Landscape Association Member July 14, 2000 Dear Jim, Thanks for taking the time to visit with me on Friday. As discussed, here is a letter to the Council with the well request. Thanks again for continually supporting our business! Best Regards, 'j ce Professional Installation . Outstanding Service Goetz Landscape & Irrigation, Inc. Goetz Garden Center 2030 Main Street Centerville, Minnesota 55038 Voice: 651/426-2136 Fax: 651/ 426-2451 Minnesota Nursery & Landscape Association Member June 14, 2000 The City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 Dear Centerville City Council: The chlorine in the city water that we use to grow and maintain plant material is having adverse effects on it. So much so, that the plants we started from seeds or plugs this spring have become non-saleable due to the exposure. At this time, I would like to make a formal request for the City Council to approve the installation of a well on our property, located at 2030 Main Street. The water from this well will be used for the growth and maintenance of plant material only. We will still be using city water for other purposes, like the other businesses within the city do. If you do have any questions or concerns about what I have proposed, I would be happy to meet with you at your earliest convenience. Best Regards, ~~e~ \.J~l~~nt- U Professional Installation ' Outstanding Service JHN-01-1900 00:17 ('If. Howard R, Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS July 6, 2000 File: S06260J-0325 Mr. Gerald Rehbein R & R leaalng PO Box 324 Hugo, Mn 55038 RE: CLEARWATER CREEK ANALYSIS Dear Mr. Rehbein: In my telephone conversation with Mr. Derek Knapp of Montgomery Watson on July a. 2000, it was determined that the 100-year flow for the section of CleBrwater Creek. from 20th Avenue upstream to '-35 is 877.5 cfs. Thhi flow remains close to the original flow used in our analysis. However, the i OO-year flow downstream of 20M Avenue Increases significantly to 1,066.7 cfs, Mr. Knapp ir.formed me that these flows should not change in the future. Based on the new flows from Montgomery Watson, re-evaluation of the 100-year floodplain and ftoodway boundaries \"1m moet likely make the flooding situation worse downstream of 20th Avenue. Upstream of 20th Avenue, the development of the floodway. based on the criteria for floodwilY width we discussed, appears feasible. T:,e new flow wiil require re--evaluation of the creek along its entire length from its outfall to Peltier Lake L,;pstre8m to '-35. Also. rather than the width we had established in our earlier meetIngs, the establishment of the floodway (generally a ol"&-foot rise) may need to be set by the community Administrator overseeing the Flood Insurance Rate Map for this area. I will contact the appropriate person and get an answer as soon as possible. Our next step should be to sohedule a meeting and discuss What options are available at this point. Sincerely, Howard R. Green Company O.?N~~ De:lnls Jermeland, P.E. Project Manager cc: Mr. Jim March - City of Centervme Ms. Kate Drewry - Rice Creek Watershed District L tr-C70600-Rahbeln.lioc 1328 Energy Park Dr.ve . St. Paui. MN 55108 . 651/644-4389 fax 651/6#9446 toll free e8a/:)ee~;!e9 - F.02/02 TOTAL P.02 ('It. Jim March From: ,nt: McLean, John (STP) Oohn.mclean@guidant.com] Friday, July 14, 2000 1:49 PM 'Jim March' RE: Week in Review I: Subject: Jim, I will echo the positive comments you have received on the new trail. It is great for my biking and running! I am also one of the users of the "haul road" to access the trail-head at Lamotte park and have seen many others doing the same. I agree it would be nice to pave that back to the park's parking lot as a trail extension (and possible link to the downtown area via trail along Centerville road in the future? ) Take care, John John McLean Guidant CRM Prizm / Tachy Master Scheduler Process and Data Integration (PDI) (651) 582-3454 ----Original Message----- L Jim March [SMTP:jmarch@goldengate.net] Friday, July 14, 2000 1:34 PM To: Wayne LeBlanc; Theresa Brenner; Tom Peterson; Ti Rehbine; Ray Devine; ichelle Moser; Lori Dorn; John McLean; Jim HEe .t; Hanna Tilsen; Patricia Scot . Elizabeth Scheller; Doug Porter; Dave Kili n; Mary Capra; Aimee Fairbroth r; Mari Nelson; Linda Broussard Vickers; . ick Travis Subject: ~eek in Review /1 / / / / / / July 14, 2000 Week in Review Building Permits this Period Building Permits YTD New Homes Year to Date * The Centerville Lion's Club will fences at LaMotte Park tomorrow morning. volunteers. We will be.. starting at 9: 00. for all volunteers!! / / * Several g;rant __ceived a reques for Commission. Th y have * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *-4- * * * * * * * * * * * * ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * " ~ be installi:nq the outfield We are lookin for additional We will be gril 'ng out free food ********************* opportunities have surfaced in the last w k. proposals from the Minnesota Amateur Sports approximately $2.5 million available for park I 1 /