HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-05-05 P&R
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
PARKS AND RECREATION AGENDA
Wednesday, May 5, 2004 - 6:30 P.M.
L CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call
II. PUBLIC HEARING(S)
m. SET AGENDA
IV. APPEARANCES
v. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
1. April 7, 2004 Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes
VL COMMITTEE BUSINESS
1. Summer Programs
A YMCA Summer Program
C. Bands in the Parks
D. Senior Programs
2. Park Monument Signs / Flower Beds
3. Economic Development Committee's Business Appreciation BBQ
4. Rice Creek Watershed District Drain Stenciling Program
5. Community Gardening
vn. UPDATES
1. Subcommittees
A Grants
B. Trails
C. Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park Warming House Renovation
D. Tracie McBride Memorial Park
E. Wheels Skate Park
2. St. Genevieve Renovation / Trail Project
3. St. Paul Water Utility Property on Centerville Lake
4. Commercial & Industrial Park Dedication Fees
VIII. FINANCIALS
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Patks & Recreation Committee
Meeting Minutes 04-07-04
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, April 7, 2004 - 6:30 p.m.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Parks and Recreation Committee of the City of Centerville
held the regularly scheduled meeting on April 7,2004, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street.
Present:
Chairperson T edd Peterson
Committee Member Andre Ziegler
Committee Member Julie Lindsay
Committee Member Suzanne Seeley
Committee Member Kathy Peil
Committee Member Richard Anderson
Absent:
Vice-Chairperson Wayne LeBlanc (7:30 p.m.)
Council:
Absent
Mrru@~~[J@\VJ@@]
Staff:
Kim Stephan
I. ROLL CALL
ChaiqJerson Peterson called the meeting to order at 6:40 p.m.
IT SET AGENDA
Motion was made by Chairperson Peterson, seconded by Committee Member Peil, to set
the April 7, 2004 Parks & Recreation Committee Agenda as is. All in favor. Motion
carried unanimously.
m. PUBLIC HEARING(S)
None.
IV. APPEARANCES
None.
V. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
Committee Member Ziegler stated his last name was spelled incorrectly in multiple places in
the March 3, 2004 Parks & Recreation Meeting Minutes. Ms. Stephan will make correction.
10f8
Parlcs & Recreation Committee
Meeting Minutes 04-07-04
Motion was made by Committee Member Seeley, seconded by Chairperson Peterson to
approve the March 3, 2004 Parks & Recreation with the above correction. Ayes - 4,
Nays - 0, Abstain - 2 (Peil, Anderson) Absent -1 (LeBlanc) Motion carried.
VI. COMMITTEE BUSINESS
Summer Pro2rams
YMCA Summer Program
The committee requested City Council donate $300 from the Parks & Recreation budget to
the YMCA Summer Program being held at Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park. This donation
is to subsidize the amount each resident would be required to pay for children enrolled in the
program. Ms. Stephan reported this was approved by council at the March 10, 2004 City
Council meeting and a check will be issued to the YMCA.
The consensus of the committee was to keep the recommendation at $300 for both sessions
opposed to $300 per session. There was previously some confusion regarding this item.
Ms. Stephan provided the committee with a rough draft of the YMCA flyer for the summer
program and the amount listed to the residents is $15 per 3 week session. With the Parks &
Recreation Committee subsidizing the program, the amount to residents was reduced from
the previously suggested $22 per session.
Bands in the Parks
Chairperson Peterson contacted the City of Lino Lakes Parks & Recreation Department
regarding what he thought was a transportable band shelter that could possibly be used in a
Centerville park for a concert. What the City of Lino Lakes actually has is a trailer which
contains equipment such as chairs and tables and is rented out for block party events. The
committee then discussed other options for possibly hosting concerts such as having a band
set up in the hockey rink. Chairperson Peterson questioned how we would determine if
there is an interest and what type of issues would it involve, how would the committee
advertise for bands interested in performing and how would insurance and security be
handled. Chairperson Peterson said he would contact other cities to determine how they
went about having an event such as concerts in the park. It also needs to be determined
what would be required by City Council and the Centennial Lakes Police Department.
Skate Park Activities
Committee Member Anderson suggested having a skate board exhibition or perhaps a
competition by age group. Committee Member Peil stated there are skate board
professionals who often tour. Chairperson Peterson stated there are going to be problems
with setting up the skate park this spring due to construction on LaMotte Drive and Heritage
Street. It has been requested that the skate pad at Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park be done
first when construction begins so the skate park can be set up as soon as possible. It will be
time consuming and labor intensive to set up all the skate park equipment on the concrete in
the hockey rink and then later move it to the asphalt pad.
The committee feels the equipment needs to be set up as soon as possible, even if it has to be
moved later as last season it was set up late and only part of the equipment was available for
20f8
Parks & Recreation Committee
Meeting Minutes 04-07-04
use. Chairperson Peterson stated Public Works is short staff and is currently in the process
of hiring two employees. Committee members suggested using volunteers to set the
equipment in place. Chairperson Peterson will keep the committee updated on this issue.
Wargo Nature Center
At the March 3, 2004 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting the committee requested Ms.
Stephan contact Mr. Todd Murawski from the Wargo Nature Center to determine if there
was interest in offering a summer program in Centerville this year. It was discussed that the
program between Wargo & the City of Centerville offered in 2002 was not very well
attended. There was not a program with Wargo offered in 2003. The YMCA did a program
for two weeks last August that was well attended. The committee thought perhaps Wargo
would be open to doing a few sessions with activities that were well attended in the past and
advertising could be combined with the Summer YMCA Program. Mr. Murawski
responded in an email with 'unfortunately we will not be able to provide programming for
you this summer due to staff shortages. We have had to cut back on existing programs
and are just not able to add new things to the summer calendar. Thank you for
considering us for your summer activities. '
Senior Programs
The committee discussed any other options seniors might be interested in and it was
suggested a questionnaire be drafted and ultimately distributed to Chauncey Barret Gardens
& the Eagle Pass Town Home Associations (2). Committee Member Seeley will draft a
survey to present to the committee. Suggestions were walking groups, bird watching,
shuffleboard, Wargo Nature Center Naturalist Programs and dance lessons.
Commercial & Industrial Park Dedication Fees
At the March 3, 2004 Parks & Recreation Meeting, Vice-Chairperson LeBlanc questioned if
there were currently any Park Dedication Fees required for commercial or industrial
properties. Chairperson Peterson responded with the City of Lino Lakes is currently
charging Park Dedication Fees for commercial property, but Centerville requires only
residential properties to pay Park Dedication Fees. Council Member Lee requested this be
added as a discussion on the next council agenda which was March 10, 2004. City Council
directed staff to research what other cities were charging, if anything, for Commercial &
Industrial Park Dedication Fees.
The information the City Clerk collected from the Cities of Lino Lakes & Hugo was
presented to City Council at the March 24, 2004 City Council Meeting. City Council
requested this information be passed on to the Parks & Recreation Committee for a
recommendation.
Both the cities of Lino Lakes & Hugo have Commercial & Industrial Park Dedication
Fees as follows:
Lino Lakes
$2,175/acre - Both Commercial & Industrial
$1,665/unit - Residential
$1,800/acre - Commercial, Industrial & Residential
Hugo
30f8
Parks & Recreation Committee
Meeting Minutes 04-07-04
The Parks & Recreation Committee discussed the various options at length. Committee
Member Peil stated she was in favor of charging fees per acre, but wanted an amount lower
than the cities current $3000/unit charge for Residential Park Dedication Fees. Committee
Member Peil felt the various fees charged for permits was already a deterrent to businesses
choosing to look at building in Centerville and wanted to keep the Park Dedication Fees
lower so as to not discourage businesses or appear that Centerville was not business friendly.
Chairperson Peterson agreed and added that Centerville's requirements for building in
industrial and commercial areas were already more stringent than neighboring communities,
and although that allowed for higher quality buildings, it also kept some businesses from
choosing Centerville. The committee agreed charges per acre would be the fairest standard
to follow opposed to per unit, since there could be one large unit on 20 acres or lO small
buildings on the same piece of property. It would be uniform, if charged by acre.
The committee discussed keeping the fee for industrial & commercial the same as
residential, but compared to the Cities of Lino Lakes and Hugo, the City of Centerville
already charges more for residential than the neighboring communities. It was decided to
recommend to council that the fees for Industrial & Commercial Park Dedication Fees be set
at the same rate as the City of Lino lakes, which would be $2 I 75/acre. Chairperson
Peterson also suggested passing this on to the Economic Development Committee for their
input.
Motion was made by Committee Member Ziegler, seconded by Committee Member
Anderson to recommend to City Council incorporating an Industrial & Commercial
Park Dedication Fee into the fee schedule with the amount being set in line with the
City of Lino Lakes at the amount of $2175/acre. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
Committee Member Ziegler commented that if the average lot size for a residential lot is 14
to Y2 acre, the Residential Park Dedication Fees already amount to approximately $5,000 per
acre so charging Commercial and Industrial $3000 per acre would be considerably less than
residential if the same formula was used. Committee Member Peil was adamant that
$3,OOO/acre was too high as fees and building codes are already higher/stricter than our
neighboring communities. She also stated commercial and industrial property was not
selling within Centerville, while residential was selling because of schools and other
amenities the area has to offer homeowners. Committee Member Seeley felt a minimum of
$2,000/acre should be charged, but would rather see $3,OOO/acre as the commercial and
industrial properties also have benefits to their employees by having trails go through their
properties and the benefit is the same as it would be for residential properties. Committee
Member Peil felt the situations are entirely different and the usage window for employees to
use a trail is small.
40f8
Parlcs & Recreation Committee
~eeting~mes04~7~4
vn. UPDATES
SUBCOMMITTEES
Grants
Committee Member Seeley reported that nothing has been heard concerning the grant
application the Parks & Recreation Committee submitted in February, but the DNR Grant
Committee has until sometime in July, 2004 to respond.
Trails
Committee Member Seeley requested feedback from the committee as to what is the
expectation of the committee regarding the trail system. Would the committee opt to move
forward with the trail whether or not a grant is awarded. Committee Member Seeley stated
the subcommittee will need to know a direction to pursue if the grant is not awarded to the
city at this time. The ramifications are if the city were to go ahead with the project without
the grant money, the committee cannot reapply for the same project as grant money will not
reimburse a previously started project. The consensus of the committee was to continue to
allocate the monies for the matching portion of the grant to reapply if necessary.
Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park Warmine: Bouse Renovation
No current updates.
Tracie McBride Memorial Park
No current updates.
Wheels Skate Park
At the previous committee meeting the option was discussed of contacting a representative
from SunRamp Solutions, one of the suppliers of skate board equipment, to help determine
the placement of various pieces and what could be effectively added to what is currently
owned by the city. Information was included in the packet concerning some options from
SunRamp Solutions. It was mentioned multiple suppliers should be contacted. Committee
Member Peil stated she felt SunRamp Solutions was the better manufacturer and if
equipment was ordered from multiple suppliers there would be an ugly menagerie of
mismatched equipment. Chairperson Peterson will follow up with SunRamp Solutions. The
committee felt it was imperative the skate park pad was done as soon as possible.
Chairperson Peterson will contact the City Engineer to get a time frame.
St. Paul Water Utilitv Propertv on Centerville Lake
No current updates concerning this property. The committee was supplied with a copy of a
letter from the City Administrator to the St. Paul Water Utility expressing interest in the
possibility of the City of Centerville purchasing one of the available lots.
50f8
Parks & Recreation Committee
Meeting Minutes 04-07-04
Chairperson Peterson's concerns are what exactly are the Parks & Recreation Committee's
current funds and what has the committee committed to, such as matching funds for the
possible grant, the skate park pad, and the paving of Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park parking
lot. When these funds are expended will there be $270,000 left to purchase the Centerville
Lake property and maintain it in the future. The committee feels there are many potential
uses for this property such as a gazebo, picnic areas, a fishing pier, swimming & canoeing,
visualizing more of an adult park on a trail system without any type of play structures for
small children. Vice-Chairperson LeBlanc mentioned this would have been a wonderful
option for a Land Acquisition Grant had the committee known sooner. There is potential to
apply for a Land Acquisition grant in 2005. The committee would like to request financials
with projected funds from the Finance Director for the next scheduled meeting.
Chairperson Peterson & Vice-Chairperson LeBlanc will go over the current Parks &
Recreation Committee budget and present it at the next meeting. There are also outstanding
issues for other parks such as what to do with the small park in Peltier Preserve and a play
structure at Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park. Had been previously discussed.
St. Genevieve Renovation / Trail Proiect - Letter to St. Genevieve
The following letter was submitted to the St. Genevieve's Planning Committee by the Parks
& Recreation Committee, with City Council's approval, to consider a trail placement in the
church's renovation plans:
Dear St Genevieve Planning Committee,
The Park and Recreation committee was informed that St Genevieve is considering a
plan to improve their property. The Parks and Recreation Committee is interested in
discussing options to improve safety and recreational value to the community by adding
two trails on the edges of some of the church property. On December 14, 2002, Mr. Wayne
LeBlanc discussed some possibilities with Father Fitzgerald. It is felt these trails will
benefit the community in many ways. Please see the attached map with a proposal to start
discussion.
The first trail would join the existing Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park Trail near the east
end of the parking lot and run north to the Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park border. It then
runs east along the park border where it then cuts across a small portion of the southeast
corner of parcel 36 to align the trail with Meadow Lane. This trail would give the
residents of Centerville an easy and much safer access to Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park.
In addition, a trail could run north from Meadow Lane on the east side of Centerville
Road to Chauncey Barett Gardens giving residents an easy route to the park.
The second trail would run adjacent to the lift station (Parcel 36A) and along the west
side of the church property (Parcel~' 36 and 15) to Heritage road. The trail would continue
north on Goiffon Road and then swing west and north along the lake on an existing
easement This keeps the trail out of the middle of the property. This trail will connect
with a future trail that will circle Centerville Lake.
60f8
Parks & Recreation Committee
~~g~mes04~7~4
Please consider this proposal so that Centerville might be the best that it can be. Please
contact Park and Recreation Chairperson, Tedd Peterson at 651-426-3272 to arrange
further discussion. Thank you for you consideration of this matter.
Chairperson Peterson and Vice-Chairperson LeBlanc attended the St. Genevieve's Planning
Committee on Tuesday, March 23, 2004 and presented the various options the committee
was interested in for a trail. The St. Genevieve's Planning Committee was receptive to the
idea of a trail, but adamant about not having the trail run along the lake on the west side of
the current rectory. The reasons given were the potential resale value of this property and
the safety of Father Fitzgerald with a trail running behind his private residence. The church
committee and Father Fitzgerald were receptive to the idea of a trail.
The main consensus was it was not desirable to go down the vacated portion of Goiffon
Road because of the safety aspect. Chairperson Peterson said it looked like what the church
committee would agree to would be a trail on the east side of the property. Chairperson
Peterson also reported nothing has been decided at this time, it was simply an informational
meeting. It was questioned by a member of the church committee whether St. Genevieve
would get some financial concessions on their upcoming road assessments in exchange for
the trail easement. Chairperson Peterson said he had no negotiating power and the church
committee would have to approach the city concerning this issue.
Chairperson Peterson stated the main goal is to ensure a trail along LaMotte Drive with a
commitment from the church to work with the city on the trail system. There are easements
along LaMotte Road which the city could work with. When the church decides on which
renovation avenue they will pursue, there will need to be a Site Plan Review and that is also
another opportunity for the city to request a trail. It was questioned whether Park
Dedication Fees would apply and what the church property is zoned at. Chairperson
Peterson stated Park Dedication Fees would not apply as they would be making
improvements to property already owned, unlike a developer who purchases property to
build residential homes. The larger church parcel is currently zoned as R2, Single Family
Residential. Chairperson Peterson will contact Mr. Wilharber to determine if the committee
had made any decisions and what steps would be next.
Cbauncev Barret 2nd Addition - Sidewalk
The committee was provided with a copy of a letter the City Administrator sent to Anoka
County regarding adding a sidewalk along Centerville Road to the Chauncey Barret Site
Plan as it was not included in the preconstruction meeting. The committee will be updated
as information is presented to the city.
Eartb Dav
Earth Day is April 22, 2004. The committee usually cleans up the parks, but turnout with
volunteers has been disappointing in recent years. Information was given to the committee
from the Rice Creek Watershed District requesting volunteers for a stenciling program to
engage people of all ages in watershed pollution prevention. Chairperson Peterson would
like to see the committee get involved with the stenciling program instead of, or addition to
70f8
Parks & Recreation Committee
Meeting Minutes 04-07-04
park cleanup. Committee Member Seeley asked for volunteers to help with the stenciling
program and will contact Rice Creek Watershed for specific of the program. Vice-
Chairperson LeBlanc also thought it was an excellent idea, a good educational tool for the
public and he thought the Peltier lake Association would like to be involved. Chairperson
Peterson suggested the committee make a request for Public Works to maintain the
stenciling after it has been completed. Update at the next scheduled meeting.
Park Monument Siens / Flower Beds
The monument signs/flower beds in each of the five (5) city parks has needed attention the
last few years and with limited staff time available, the planting and weeding of these flower
beds was done by volunteers in the 2003 summer season. Perennials were donated to be
planted in each bed and residents/committee members did the planting and weeding. The
volunteers are still willing to continue with this project, but the beds really need additional
work this year. Committee Member Seeley would like to request additional volunteer help
to maintain these flower beds. The committee would like to request funds not to exceed $50
per park/flower bed to purchase supplies such as plants, fertilizer, top soil & mulch. The
committee feels these funds should not be taken from the Parks & Recreation Committee's
budget, but rather from the Park Maintenance Fund.
Motion was made by Chairperson Peterson, seconded by Committee Member Lindsay,
to request funds not to exceed $50 per park/flower bed to purchase supplies such as
plants, fertilizer, top soil & mulch with funds from the Park Maintenance Fund.
All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
VIll. ADJOURNMENT
Motion was made by Committee Member Peil, seconded by Committee Member
Anderson to adjourn the April 7, 2004 Parks & Recreation Committee meeting at 8:15
p.m. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Transcribed by Kim Stephan
80f8
. I
TO: Parks and Recreation Committee Members
FROM: Kim Stephan
SUBJECT: Updates
DATE: April 30, 2004
From the April 7, 2004 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes:
Park Monument Si2ns / Flower Beds
The monument signs/flower beds in each of the five (5) city parks has needed attention the last
few years and with limited staff time available, the planting and weeding of these flower beds
was done by volunteers in the 2003 summer season. Perennials were donated to be planted in
each bed and residents/committee members did the planting and weeding. The volunteers are
still willing to continue with this project, but the beds really need additional work this year.
Committee Member Seeley would like to request additional volunteer help to maintain these
flower beds. The committee would like to request funds not to exceed $50 per park/flower bed
to purchase supplies such as plants, fertilizer, top soil & mulch. The committee feels these
funds should not be taken from the Parks & Recreation Committee's budget, but rather from
the Park Maintenance Fund.
Motion was made by Chairperson Peterson, seconded by Committee Member Lindsay, to
request funds not to exceed $50 per park/flower bed to purchase supplies such as plants,
fertilizer, top soil & mulch with funds from the Park Maintenance Fund. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimously.
At the April 14, 2004 City Council Meeting the above motion was approved by City Council.
Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park, Tracie McBride Memorial Park, Royal Meadows Park and
Acorn Creek Park have volunteers from the Parks & Recreation Committee maintaining these
flower beds at this time. Eagle Park was being maintained by a resident, but I will take a look
at it to determine if it needs any additional maintenance. Provide City Hall with the receipts
and you will be reimbursed to $50.00.
Parks & Recreation Recommendation For CommerciallIndustrial Park Dedication Fees
The Council discussed and tabled this item until June, 2004. This is dependant on pending
legislation.
Motion by Council Member Lee. seconded bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. to
..~I.I_ ..1._ __....__ _C ..1._ n__I~ ~_ n_____..~__ r<___~__~__ ________.I_~__ r__
t.~UI.'t; l..ll~ lll.~t..'-t,:;l UI 1.1lC ..l.. al. ~ CJ(, ..L,,-rLI. tti-LIUll '-..,UlllmJ:;:'~IUll I. C~UI.llll.lCllUa.l-J.Ull .u~
Commercial/Industrial Park Dedication Fees, as presented. All in favor. Motion carried
.._~_~_~.._1._
.,..a III' '..IIl.. .,." ~
~-------- - --- ~ -
~+ ..,....._......~r:.n...-'!T..... D^__...r.n.-+:__ J T_......;] D.....__:...........+
~!.= .~!...!!;~!.!:='!'~ -!.~~llu'!'n!..!Ull! ~.!all..!.-.!. U',~~!.-
:Mr. Tom \Vilharber, as a representative of St. Genevieve's Church appeared at the April 28,
..,n{"L,1 r-'~+....... ~......".........~;l ~.......-"",,,+;_.ro- +r... ....1;.............,.....E'O -.w-;...,,;...... ;..................... 'l"t..._ r-'......".,._......;j ~A"-"'""--""'-+;___ 1\,{";_.....+.......... ............... _......+
.L.\.lU~ "'_'I!.. J L-LJUIH"'....!.! .l!..!.~c::!...!!!b LU U!~L>ll~~ !.l!_L~' .!~~u-~'" -.!- 1.1'0 L'VU.l.!~!.! .!.v_!...C;c~!..l!.!~ .LY-!.!l!U!.'0~ a.! 'G !!Vt
available at this time. A.l update will be given by Council Liaison Tom Lee or Chairperson
LlCII.~~""'.n^__
~ \.....Lv1 ;:JU1.l.
Sf.; Paill \-Vater ITtility ProDem" un CenterY'ilJe LHke
Included in the packet are copies of current correspondence with the St. Paul Water Utility.
f"~'+"-l' ~.ro.,.~_......:l ...-v\1'"'o.+~I'"'o._........,J.+....... t,.....~,.......... ~_~...... ................t..;.riro _.....__rt__.......+ rI.-+;......._ D .......... ....t..__ 1-......................1 r.+ +J."......... .......__.....:r+ ....~t.._A...l.........A
~J!l Y ~,VU.!H__,!! .!llVl!V.!!"GU iLJ .!.!.!l YG ..LV..!..!. ~ ",L.!!!Ua pI ~~!::.I!! L'P!..!V!! -.U tV !.!!G VUQ..! U at !!.n:::;.: !!c::_~t ~'L>!!~.UU!'L,U
...",.-""'''"''-+~~~ +...-.. ~...-+t,...-u- ~~I'\rn...,..,~........_
.!!H....~!.-.11!C !(J ...!.U! !,..!lL! LLl:=O\.JU~;:".!o.!\..l!L
-
CIty 01' Centerville -- Solution to Stonnwater Pollution
Page 1 of2
City of Centerville
About Centerville
Agendas and Minutes
Business Directory
City Departments
Building Inspections &
Permits
Public Works
Water & Sewer Utilities
Solution to Stormwater
Pollution
Environmentally Friendly
Ways to Protect our
Community
Elections
Local Information
Ordinances
Your City
Government
Linked Info-Graphics
Employment
Opportunities
Disclaimer
L-
Search
I GO
M_~-
@ Full Site
G This Section
Search Tips
Solution to Stormwater Pollution
The Rice Creek Watershed District......
is Looking for Volunteers!
The Rice Creek Watershed District is launching a storm drc:
stenciling program. Storm drain stenciling is an educationc
interactive tool to engage people of all ages in watershed polll
prevention. This brings the message back to public attention \j
bright new image on the street and another opportunity fo
volunteers & media attention. The message on the street tells
NOT TO DO and WHY. Media fliers will explain what people I
DO and HOW.
Stenciling works! It raises awareness and leads to pollutio
prevention. Many people unknowingly believe storm drains co
to sewer treatment facilities and that industry is the greatest s(
of water pollution. According to EPA, over 60% of our watf
pollution comes from urban and agricultural storm water runoff
point source pollution). People are more likely to change th
behavior to prevent pollution once they understand that storm'
runoff pollutants end up in water bodies.
Volunteers will be trained and organized to stencil an educati,
message next to the storm sewers notifying the public that t
streets and waters are connected.
For further information or questions contact Dawn Dubats, F
Creek Watershed District Environmental Educator Coordinate
763-398-3070 x178 or email: ddubats@ricecreekwd.com
Click here for information from the Rice Creek Watershed District entitled 'Evel
is a Shoreline',
Click here for your Stormwater Checklist.
Click here to learn how resurrected rain barrels reduce run-off & conserve w
Work less in your yard. Planting native vegetation and practicing low-input lav
saves you time, money and reduces environmental impacts. What kind of sum
you want to have? Don't let your yard decide how you spend your time.
Click here if you need more free time,
http://www.centerville.govoffice.com/index.asp?Type=B _ BASIC&SEC={ 461DEB68-4D... 4/22/2004
City of Centerville -- Solution to Stormwater Pollution
Page 2 of2
Description of the NPDES Phase \I MS4 Permit Process
Click here for the City of Centerville's Best Management Practices (BMP) Pages
of Contents.
Cli~~er~for a copy of the General Storm Water Permit Application for Small
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems.
A Homeowner's Guide
city of Centerville I About Centerville I Agendas and Minutes I Business Directory I City Departments I Local Information I Ordinances I Your City
Linked Info-Graphics I Employment Opportunities I Disclaimer
,",,<i 'y it~
gq~~
You currently have an active admin session: Click to return to Site Administration
http://www.centerville.govoffice.com/index.asp?Type=B ~BASIC&SEC={ 461DEB68-4D... 4/22/2004
~
- Rice Creek Watershed District
When it Rains, It Stores!
Resurrected Rain Barrels Reduce Run-off and Conserve Water
The Water Pollution Problem
Non~point source pollution is our nation's munber one water quality problem. Non-point source pollution refers to
many contributing sources of pollution such as fertilizer, pet waste, oil, leaves, grass clippings, etc. whereas point
source pollution refers to pollution that can be traced back to one particular source such as a factory pipe. In
natural Jandscapes, rain tends to soak into the ground gradually. However, in wban and suburban traditional
developments, much of the land is covered by impervious surfaces - such as streets, parking lots and roofs - where
the water cannot soak into the ground. Instead, the water runs-off rapidly canying the munerous non-point
pollutants it collects along the way into our water bodies.
Simple Solutions
A solution to non-point pollution is to reduce the amount of water flowing over impervious surfaces. There are
many ways to encourage water to soak into the ground instead of running off; rain gardens, rooftop gardens,
pervious pavements and rain barrels are a few ideas.
Good 01' Rain Barrels
Saving rainwater to use for watering or during dry months is an old practice that is becoming popular again.
Harvesting systems vary from a simple barrel under a down-spout to high tech systems using cisterns, pumps and
flow controls. The simple method usually uses a row of barrels connected by hoses and uses gravity to transfer the
overflow into the next barrel and a spigot to get the water out.
Manufactured rain barrels are sold at many garden stores, vary in cost from about $60-150 and come in various
looks and sizes. Handy people can convert a used drum into a rain barrel for a nominal cost.
. Benefits of Rain Barrels
.;;>;\.~ · Saves money on your water bill by providing free
rainwater for your lawn and garden
· Decreases volume of polluted storm water nm-off
reaching water bodies
· Saves tax dollars by reducing or delaying the need to
expand or upgrade sewage treatment facilities
· Reduces the severity of basement flooding caused by
sewer back-up
· Diverts water away from your foundation
Keel> in Mind
The rainwater inlet should be screened so mosquitoes CANNOT enter nor breed. Screens also keep out materials
such as leaves that provide nutrients for algal growth and covers keep out the sun. If screens and cover fit properly,
algal growth is not a problem Rain barrels are not suggested for houses with treated cedar shakes or roofing
materials containing asbestos. The gutter systems should not have lead solder or lead-based paint.
Is your house right for a rain barrel or two? Do your part for water quality and install one when you're gearing up
for spring!
FROM STREETS TO STREAMS:
WHATEVER IS IN THE STREETS GOES STRAIGHT
TO OUR STREAMS VIA STORM~SEWERS
KEEP THE STREET IN FRONT OF YOUR HOUSE CLEAN
Grass clippings and leaves that are
washed into our water bodies are
like dumping fertilizer in our lakes.
Clean up oil, pet waste and correct
erosion .
~
MINIMIZE WATER FLOWING OVER HARD SURFACES
· Redirect downspouts into your yard an d ilstall rain barrels to collect the roof
run-off.
. Plant native plants (deep roots absorb more water, provide habilat and help
slabUize so~.
. Create rain gardens (low areas with tolerant plants to absorb excess water).
. Use peNious pavements (where the water soaks in) whenever possible.
YOUR ACTIONS MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE
. The MN Phosphorus Lawn Ferblizer Law, now in effec~ prohibits the use of lertiizers conlaining
phosphorous in the T1Mn Cities unless your soil test indicates that you need it Of you are slarting a
new lawn. THE MIDDLE NUMBER OF YOUR FERTILIZER BAG SHOULD BE "0".
. Fall is the best time to fertilize, but get a soil1:lst first! (Go to www.extension.umn.edu and follow
the "Yard and Garden Lile" link orcaIl612-625-3101.) Read the U of M Extension's latest
research on lawns.
. Mow your grass b 3-inches (to help shade out weeds - minimizing herbicide use).
. Volunteer! Contact RCWD to get your group involved storm drain stending or water monitoring.
EVERY CURB IS A SHORELINE
RICE CREEK WATERSHED DIsnucr
Storm drains provide a direct route for pollutants on streets to flow into our rivers, lakes and
streams. Contact Rice Creek Watershed District today to get
your group involved in storm drain stenciling.
WE NEED YOUR HELP.
Many residents are
unaware that storm
drains connect the
streets to our local waters and pour antifreeze,
fertilizer, paint, used motor oil or animal waste
down storm drains thinking that the drain runs to a
sewage treatment facility. But in fact, storm water is not treated before entering lakes and rivers.
Stenciling and distributing door hangers is a fun way to educate people about the simple steps
they can take to keep Minnesota's waters clean.
In natural landscapes, rain tends to soak into the ground gradually.
However, nowadays, much of the land is covered by impervious
surfaces - such as streets, parking lots and roofs - where the water
cannot soak into the ground. Instead, water runs-off rapidly through
storm sewers carrying pollutants collected along the way directly into
our water bodies. Typical pollutants include grass clippings, leaves,
pesticides, motor oil and pet wastes.
I)J"EASE! IN}N"I~ l)fflll.llTE!
~4ItC ~~ ~~
DRAINS TOIU\TER
Weare making strides in reducing excessive storm water run-off pollution with better building
designs and innovative practices such as:
· "green roofs" (rooftop gardens absorb rainfall)
· rain gardens (garden in low areas that absorb excessive rain)
· rain barrels (barrels under downspouts)
· pervious pavements (allows water to soak in)
But we need community involvement to stencil our streets and get the word out - EvERY CURB IS
A SHORELINE! Contact Dawn Dubats at RCWD: 763-398-3070 x178/ ddubats@ricecreekwd.com
NEED MORE FREE TIME?
-RICE Can.. W -'TEIISHlE" DIST8JCT
Work less in your yard.
Planting native vegetation
and practicing low-input
lawn-care saves yon time
and money and reduces
environmental impacts.
What kind of summer do
you want to have? Don't
let your yard decide how
you spend your time!
As Maintenance-Free as
a Plant Can Be
Native plants are best
adapted to the local
climate and once
established, seldom need
watering, fertilizing,
mulching, protection from
frost or pests or continuous
mowing. Therefore, native
landscaping generally
costs less over time.
Native Critters Need
Native Plants
Native plants
attract
beautiful and
diverse
native
butterflies,
pollinators and birds to
your yard since Minnesota
plants and animals evolved
together over time and
have complex
relationships. For example,
a native plant may produce
a chemical to protect it
from certain insects. A
caterpillar that eats this
plant is then protected
from predators because of
a bitter taste. Plants and
animals depend on each
other for food, habitat and
seed dispersal.
Hold On!
Let's Let this Soak in...
Native grasses have deep
roots (often 8 feet or more)
that hold down the soil
provide excellent erosion
control. These expansive
roots also absorb a lot of
water runoff compared to
monoculture ground
covers such as bluegrass or
purple crown vetch with
shallow roots.
Naltole Herbaceous Plants
Native legumes (peas and
beans) fertilize naturally
by enriching the soil with
nitrogen.
The Grass is Always
Greener ...
You can have a beautiful
yard with little
maintenance. For details,
go to
www.extension.llmn.edu
search "Low Input Lawn
Care" (LILac).
If you are starting a new
lawn, choose low
maintenance grasses such
as: Kentucky bluegrasses
(Kenblue, Park, South
Dakota Certified, and
Newport) and fine-leaved
fescues (creeping red
fescue, chewings fescue,
and hard fescue). Other
bluegrass varieties that do
acceptably well once
adapted to lower input
levels include Rugby,
Parade, Touchdown, Ram
I, Nugget, Sydsport, and
Monoply.
Eliminate one fertilizer
application by leaving
clippings on the lawn. The
best time to
fertilize is in
the fall for
low-input
lawns.
Remember,
fertilizers
containing
phosphorus CANNOT be
used on lawns in the 7
county metro area.
(Exceptions to this law
apply when establishing a
new lawn or when a soil
test shows phosphorus is
needed. )
Keep your mowing height
at 2- 3 inches to help
screen shade out weeds. A
slightly higher cutting
height also encourages
deeper rooting and allows
moisture and nutrients
from a larger soil volume
to gather.
Don't over-water. Use a
rain gauge
when
watering
and apply
1/2 inch of
water two or
three times /
week. Over-
watering simply wastes
water and predisposes
lawns to fungal diseases.
"
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
President: Patrick Harris + Vice President: John Zanmiller
Commissioners: Matt Anfang + Bob Cardinal + Gregory Kleindl + Debbie Montgomery + Dave Thune
April 20, 2004
Ms. Kim Moore-Sykes, City Administrator
City of Centerville
1880 Main Street
Centerville, Minnesota 55038
Subject: Board of Water Commissioners vacant lot at 1601 LaMotte Drive
Dear Ms. Moore-Sykes:
Thank you for your letter of April 13, 2004 requesting that the Board of Water Commissioners be
asked to consider reducing the sale price of the subject lot if the City agreed to remove the raw water
conduit. Although not technically an offer, discussion of this proposal is scheduled for the Board's
next meeting, tentatively scheduled for May 11, 2004.
In the time since you and I last discussed the property, I have received the enclosed Letter of Opinion
from Orion Appraisals, Inc. dated April 13, 2004. The Letter provides a valuation of the remaining lot
in the event the City was to operate a public park adjacent to it. In addition, staff has estimated cost
savings that would be experienced by the Board as a result of two possible scenarios posed by the
City. Please see the enclosed Option Plans A and B, Valuation Options and the summary below:
Option A: City removes pipe from the vacant lot, resulting in revised value of $284,500.
Option B: City allows pipe to remain in place, resulting in revised value of $253,900.
Staff is prepared to recommend either option to the Board.
I can be reached at 651-266-6265 and would be glad to discuss the above options and staff-
recommended prices at any time convenient for you or your staff.
J1L/~
WLTljl
William L. Tschida
Unit Supervisor
copy: Stephen P. Schneider, SPRWS General Manager
Dave Schuler, SPRWS Chief Engineer
Enclosures: 4
SAINT PAUL REGIONAL WATER SERVICES
Stephen P. Schneider, General Manager
84th St E. Saint Paul MN 55101-1007 . TTY: 651-266-6299
Saint Paul Regional Water Services provides quality water services to the following cities:
Arden Hills.Falcon Heights.Lauderdale-Little Canada.Maplewood;Mendota.Mendota Heights.Roseville.Saint Paul.West St. Paul
AA-ADA-EEO Emolover ,..;.;., rf'1 pn"nted on recvcled paDer
01ttlll~
r
Commercial & Industrial
Machinery & Equipment
Appraisal Specialists
April 13, 2004
Mr. Bill Tschida
Baint Paul Regional Water Services
8 ;.. 4th Street East, Suite 400
S1. Paul, MN 55101
RE: Two single family lots with
one lot improved with a dwelling
1601 Lamotte Drive
. Centerville & Lino Lakes, MN
Dear Mr.- Tschida:
Please refer to our recent appraisal of these two parcels, dated November 5,2003. These
'. "
parcels consists of two single family residen:tiallots; one (parcel 2 - southerly lot) improved with
a smgle faIDny dwelling and one (parce1J - northerly lot) vaCant. The dwelling one Parce1.2 is
considered to be functionally andphysica11y obsolete and a hindrance to the land. The highest and
best use of the site that this property is situated on, is considered to be for the dwelling to be
removed and the land improved with a mid to upper bracket home. Each lot contains 112 feet
of lake frontage and a gross area of approximately 23,184 square feet.
The properties are located on the southeast side of Centerville Lake, on the northwest side
"of Lamotte Drive at .1601 Lamotte Drive in both Centerville and LinoLakes, Minnesota. Our.'
conclusion -of value for these two lots, assumed to be vacant, as o(November 5, 2003 was
. $270,OOO-each.
. _ In response to your request, "we have analyzed the value of the Parcel 2 (southerly parcel
clJ!Iently improved with a dwelling), if Parcel 1 (northerly parcel currently vacant) were utilized
as a public park.' .
- .
- .
Based on "the 'information c6~tained in this report, and other da!? considered in this
,analysis; it is our opinion that the MarketYalueofthe subject property (parcel-2)-~-Assumed to
. 'be Vacant" an~ based on a' one year marketing exposure perio~,as of April 8; 2004:
. . , ~.;, . .
TWO HUNDl,{ED AND THIRTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS
, , .' ,$235,000
J~ .........
F. W. Ge:i!J1w .
Certified ~r~ Real Property Appraiser
License # 4001499
ORlON APPRAISALS, INC
3495 Willow Lake Blvd. . Suite '100 . St. Paul, MN 55110
(651) 636-1339 . Fax: (651) 636-2p:U (800) 274-9677. www.orionappraisals.com
I
,
I
I
f
W
~
::5
w
f ~
-'
>
I cr:
W
l-
:
I z
w
u
I
I
""" <t s::: .
g 0 "C
C\J s:::.- a:
g-om(l)
+::0....
0.0....
0_0
(I):2E
a:ca
(1)...1
c......
.- 0
D.U)
.....
?
~..
II /,~",t.~'J.
.oq ,tJ>
. '~.
I
I
I
."~j
V
I
.".,----!
v/
~.
rI'
..I>
LOT 6, BLOCK 1
. All In'T""T"C"c 1C"""T Ie n.1"'\1""^~ I .
L,,""YIV' I L...:J ,.:J I nVVI. IV' . ~
F:;.....m~ !t.y . y.r"
2"!!, 0 II
. /f
;r'1 ~,
. f' .
!I
L
11
[
r
[
~
/
~j~
..
/
.f
.!5
1
.(
0"
\..'
co
I I' \.
1 .d"
11 I~ ~
. 1J '0:: -.= =r3 ~
~ .:5 I), ~~"')
. .. ~r;-;" x,v ~o:~. \li
,,'" nG k>S-
"-' ,t)
o <(t" '}.,,>.
~I .,..,.
'.
J
2
I
S50'29'2r~ _.q ~--;
--159.83 ~ ~ ill ~ ....
-- 207.0 -- ~............ ..............r '
. LOT 1, BLOCI< 1
I A I ''''TT,-" ')U/"'\ A /"'\/"'\'T,,,,..
L"nI'lIV I ,'::".:J .....,'U nUVl1 IVI.
.r' .
. ,...~/....
. ~" C;.M~
.~.~~~.
..e.<"" ~.;.o
..~~
...
o
,<(
o
0:::
....
Co
<{
CD
0..
"0..
0>
c
~
CJ)
'x
l.U
~
<<S
"C "C
C
'cu :J
~ 0
..0
CD -
c
.c CD
0 E
-
CD CD
.CJ)
C. <<S
a: W
.
.
.
.
w
~
5
W
-1
-1
>
ex:
, I
LU
r-
z
w
u
-.:t
o
o
C\J
o
C\J
I
~
/.1'
v:
,J-'
c}
..."
LOT 5, 8LOCJ< 1
I A" JI"\ TIre -'leT It. r'\r\t.'A)" I
L.J""\IVIV I I i:.,:) ...} I nUUI'IVI1 ~
-t'~
~'''.'''''::1 n.~ y,F
" ~ % !!
t+E~ I
/. ~
t
L
1\
.C
0.
<(
t
t
~
/
al
i~~
...
/
"~
03
I
cJ
o
,<{
o
cr:
w
~ 0'
,,'
~ J ...~ '
h -0
J j 1_,
o.,:.J [J::& - = ::1] 'l-
.~} <(,'
, c/1r~~' " t''v so.'
,~ v: r'V 'So
~\.j '0....
~ <(~ '}."'):
::1 ~"O"
/
,.~)
\~
I
I
/J
l- ",'
V
..
..,.
55O'29'27"E lq .,-:
--159 83--,,,, ~ I
",.. ill ---1 w
-- 207.0 -- f"''''''''''''''''''''''''r I
l.OT ~. 8LOC1< 1
I A l,r\.T-r",-(' 'l"''-'" A "1""\'.11""\)", J
LnlVIV J I c....:J Lo' "tLl r'\UUI I IVI't
,F"
. utc' ~.\.
" v~c..,.. ~
~..., r '?},p0~
rJ>.<"i$",. {.l
.. -<""V''''-t0
..~v::Y
>-
.....
ltl
"0 "0
C
"(ii ::l
CD a; 0
a. ..... ..a
"6. 0) -
..a c
Ol CD
C 0 E
~ -
CD CD
"x 0- en
ltl
W 0: w
.
.
.
.
OJ c '
0'U
S:::.- a:
o+-'
._ ctS Cl)
"'O+-'
o.O+'"
0_0
Cl.)2
a:ctS
Cl)..J
c.T"'"
.- 0
a. CO
T"'"
I
I
,
Board of Water Commissioners Property
Vacant Lot at 1601 LaMotte Rd.
Valuation Options
04/20/04
Option A. City removes pipe
Appraised
Value
$ 270,000
ADD
Considerations
$ 35,000
SUBTRACT
Considerations
Appraised value of vacant lot with pipe removed (11-05-03)
Reduction in value of adjacent lot (04-13-04 Letter of Opinion)
$ (20,500) Savings from allowing 130 feet of pipe to remain in place
$ 284,500 Purchase Price
Option B. City allows pipe to remain in around
Appraised
Value
$ 270,000
ADD
Considerations
$ 35,000
SUBTRACT
Considerations
Appraised value of vacant lot with pipe removed (11-05-03)
Reduction in value of adjacent lot (04-13-04 Letter of Opinion)
$ (20,500) Savings from allowing 130 feet of pipe to remain in place
$ (30,600) Savings from 157 less feet of new pipe to install
$ 253,900 Purchase Price
Above purchase prices assume 2004 closing date.
1601 LaMotte Valuation Options
..
.
TO: Parks and Recreation Committee Members
FROM: Kim Stephan \2b
SUBJECT: Budget / Financials
DATE: April 30, 2004
The following correspondence is from Committee Member LeBlanc concerning the Parks
& Recreation Committee's Budget. A copy of the budget is attached, followed by
financials from Ms. Ellen Paul seth, Finance Director.
Here is the last budget we discussed from Aug 6, 2003. I added updates on Sep 4, 2003
and April 29, 2004 as indicated in the document It has a feature called "Tracking"
which shows every change made. At the front, I list the updates and dates.
I added 110,000 for the parking lot and 30,000 for the skate park. If anyone has more
information, let me know and l'U add it to the list. I did not want to make any more
changes than necessary so that everyone could see the previous data and relate it to the
new. We might also want to look at the maintenance costs and do a projection if more
costs are anticipated in the future.
Centerville Parks and Recreation Budget 4/29/~ __
This document reflects discussion from the 8/6/03 Park and Recreation meeting.
Update historY
On 9/4/03 Added mission statement and subcommittee detail at the end.
On 4/29/04 Added tables on Expected Expenses and Possibilities.
Park and Recreation Income Amount Timeframe
Cash and Investments
The Shores (Capital Fund) 20,000 Now
Pheasant Marsh I (Capital Fund) 39,600 Now
Woods of Clearwater Creek (Capital Fund) 7,500 Now
Lions Gambling Donation (Dedicated to Warming House Renovation) 25,229 Now
CD's (Due 2004) 2,361 Now-2004
The Shores (pedestrian Trailways Capital Food) 11,000 Now
Woods of Clearwater Creek (pedestrian Trailways Capital Fund) 1,500 Now
Spring Lake Park Lions Donation (for bleachers) 1,000
Subtotal 108,190
Proiected Receivables
Pheasant Marsh IT 54,000 2003Hl'1
Buckbee Development (Instead of19@2 000 it's probably 19@i3,OOO) 57,000 2003H2?
Subtotal 219,190 2003
Hunter's Crossing IT (77@3 000 or perhaps more if advanced ) 23l,000? 2004-20017
Subtotal 450,190 2003-2oo7?
Ooeratinl! Budl!et for 2003
Park Committee (Meeting attendance) 2,080 2003
Park Pro=mTl'O rR'T1lc & skateboard attendants, etc.) 13,750 2003
Park Maintenance 54,663 2003
SubTotal of Operating Budget for 2003 Onlv 70,493
f Exnected Exnenses Amount Timeframe
I
Parking lot (per Mary Capra 4/28/04) used to be 50le, curb and gutter 110.000 2004
added to cost annarentlv
Skate Park nad 30,000 2004
Trail grant exnosure flikelv hood of Q"ettinQ" 2Tant is low?) 60.000
Possibilities Amount Timeframe
St Paul Water nronertv cost 253.000 2004-20057
_----{~~~:~;~~i[~';'j~~~;"t~{""~:ji~J
a._ ,'0
Expense budget items are sorted roughly by the timeframe and priority.
Park and Recreation Expense Description Cost Timeframe Priority
CaDitaI Budget
Reooir roof of warming house as needed. Lions to donate labor. 4,500 2003 AA
Pave oarkiru! lot in Lamotte Park (approved by Council June? 2003) 55,000 2004 A
Four bike racks, one per park ~ $500. Acorn Park already allocated. 2,000 2004 B
Form a subcommittee to design and renovate the warming house. 10,000- 2004-2005 B
Note: The footings are inadequate for a seCond level Certain monies 20,000
have been allocated by the Council specifically for renovation.
Lamotte Park play structure 35,000
Redesign Tracie McBride Pm to coincide with water tower 30,000? 2005-2006 A
removal Some items to consider:
Replace border and fill in large playlot, lOk?
Expand basketball area to full court, 4k?
Add small picnic shelter, 1 Ok? 1Iy for a grant?
Remove 2 existing small playlots and move to large playlot
New barbeaue vit
Possible relocate of wheels park 30,000 2004 A
Bird and/or Bat houses in certain parks 300 2004-2006 C
Possible purchBse of some St Paul Water property or coordinate with 100,000- 2005 B
Lino Lakes on a DlIfchase 200,000
Coordinate possible desired items relating to the 4 lane Main Street 10,000- 2005-2006 A
reconstmction for 2005 or 2006 50,000
Community gardens, water, tilling, etc 500 2004 B
Trails
Class 5 tI3il from Lamotte Parle to Meadow Lane (700' @$7). Note: 5,000 A
also discussed on the park walk was alternate use of Centerville road
and 1he"temporary" road. The temporary road must not become a
road because Anoka Connty does not want a twn lane there.
Backgronnd: Obtain easement or purchase a strip ofland for a trail
from Lamotte Park to Meadow Lane. This is a safety issue for people
going to/from Lamotte Park.. The land is CWTentIy churcl1 property.
Note: On Dee 14, 2002, Wayne LeBlanc talked to Father Fitzgerald
about possible 1rai1s on c1mrch property. Father Fi~era1d was
agreeable to trails on the edges of the property from Lamotte Parle to
:M=adow Lane and from Lamotte Parle north along Lamotte Drive to
the church school He did not want trails in 1he middle of the
property as that would limit possible future development He was
also agreeable to a trail going through the clmrch!rectory property
somewhere to get to Main St. Details would all have to be worked, of
course.
Asphalt for trail from Lamotte Park to Meadow Lane (700' @J;IO) 7,000 B
Class 5 trail just east of and parallel to Centervi11e Road from II ,000 A
Meadow Lane to HlDlters Crossing trail (1500' @$7). This is also a
safety issue for anyone who has to use Centerville Road. Anoka
CQllIIty has said !here are no plans to consIruct a tmil or -widen
Centerville Road.
Asphalt for trail just east of and parallel to Centerville Road from
Meadow Lane to Hunters Crossing trail (1500' (a)$10)
Class 5 for trail from Pheasant Marsh to 20th Ave (2500' @$7). This
.fmisbes a trail that might not get done for a long time.
Asphalt for trail from Pheasant Marsh to 20th Ave (2500' (a)$1O)
Class 5 trail from Lamotte Park to church school (700i @$?)
Asphalt trail from Lamotte Park to church school 000' (a)$1O)
Class 5 for trail along 20m Ave south of Main St (WOO'? (a),S7)
I Asphalt for trail along 20m Ave south ofMlin St (1000'? (a)$1O)
Total 2003 Capital Bud2et
Maintenance Bud.eet (approx 50k/vr)
Normal maintenance, mowing, etc
Flower beds and wildflowers around signs at each parle V ohmteers
to weed. $100 per pari;: allocated for new plants.
Other Budeet Cate.eory
Grant writing seminars or education
Attendants for ice skating rink and/or wheels park (aunrox $8Jhr)
Pr<>grams for community thrOUl!h Warm, Lino Lakes, or YMCA
Park and Rec Program Coordinator and Planner
15,000 B
18,000 A
25,000 B
5,000 B
7,000 B
7,000 B
10,000 B
50,000 Yearly
500 Yearly
A
B
2,000
6,000 Yearly
2,000 Yearly
40,000 Yearly
AA
A
A
A
In Pro!!ress (Funds already aooroved and allocated)
Bike Rack for Acorn Park 500
Repair Lamotte Park phone
Trail maps for Park and Rec to be in EOC packets. EDC apparently
has funds approved already but is apparently waiting for 140 or so
old packets to get used up first
Notes:
· Grants have the potential to almost double the money. It can't hurt to pursue aggressively.
· A proposed Main street "4 lane" improvement pf(~ect may occur in 2005 or 2006. Trails for Main
Street and other destinations should be coordinated with this improvement project as well as other
possible city improvements.
· Subcommittees formed include:
o Writing grants to try to double our money (shelters, play equipment, trails, lake property, etc)
[Suzanne. Julie. Wayne]
o Redesigning Tracie McBride Park to C<Jincide with removal of the water tower in around 2005
[Suzanne. Richard. Andre]
o Renovating the warming house
[Tedd. Kathy]
o Designing and coordinating trails with nearby communities
(Wayne. Suzanne. Julie]
o Wheels park C<Jnsiderations. Equipment is apparently too difficult to setup and a permanent
place might work better than the current double use of the hockey rink Some possibilities are
AC<JfD, Tracie McBride, Lamotte parks, and the area behind city hall.
[Kathy. Andre, Richard]
Park and Recreation Capital Fund
Month Ended April 30, 2004
Cash
The Shores $20,000
Pheasant Marsh I $39,600
Woods of Clearwater Creek $7,500
Pheasant Marsh" $54,000
Peltier Preserve $57,000
Hunters Crossing II $108,000
Lions Shave the Mayor $500
Andre Ziegler $120
Lions Gambling Donation* $25,229
Dead Broke Saddle Club** ($61 )
Spring Lake Park Lions*** ($70)
Bonestroo Donation $250
Total Cash $312,068
Investments
CD's Due 2004 $2,361
Total Investments $2,361
Receivable
$0
Total Receivable $0
Total Cash & Receivable $314,429
* dedicated for renovation of warming house
** over on purchase of bike racks $500 - $561
*** over on bleachers purchase w/sales tax $1000-$1070
4/29/2004
3:56 PM
park budget 2003.xls
Capital Plan
City of Centerville, MN
PROJECTS BY YEAR
2003
thru
2007
Project Name
Department
Project #
Priority
Project Value
2004
Playground Equipment - LaMotte Park Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-001 2 45,000
Trail from LaMotte Park to Meadow Lane Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-005 3 5,000
Trail from Meadow Lane to Hunters Crossing Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-006 3 7,000
Pave LaMotte Parking Lot Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-007 3 50,000
Picnic Shelter in Acorn Creek Park Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-009 3 15,000
Relocation of Wheels Park Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-013 3 30,000
Total for 2004 152,000
2005
SI Paul Water Utility Land Acquisition Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-003 3 150,000
Renovate warming house Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-004 3 20,000
Trail from LaMotte Park to Meadow Lane Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-005 3 5,000
Trail from Meadow Lane to Hunters Crossing Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-006 3 11,000
Trail from Pheasant Marsh to 20th Ave Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-010 3 9,000
Trail from LaMotte Park to SI Gen Education Bldg Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-011 3 2,500
Trail along 20th Avenue South Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-012 3 3,000
Coordinate with CR#14 Reconstruction Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-014 3 25,000
Total for 2005 225,500
2006
Redesign Traci McBride Park Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-002 3 25,000
Trail from LaMotte Park to Meadow Lane Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-005 3 7,000
Trail from Meadow Lane to Hunters Crossing Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-006 3 15,000
Picnic Shelter in Tracie McBride Park Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-008 3 15,000
Trail from Pheasant Marsh to 20th Ave Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-010 3 18,000
Trail from LaMotte Park to SI Gen Education Bldg Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-011 3 5,000
Trail along 20th Avenue South Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-012 3 7,000
Total for 2006 92,000
2007
Trail from Pheasant Marsh to 20th Ave Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-010 3 25,000
Trail from LaMotte Park to SI Gen Education Bldg Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-011 3 7,000
Trail along 20th Avenue South Parks and Recreation 03-PRK-012 3 10,000
Total for 2007 42,000
GRAND TOTAL 511,500
Produced using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software
Page 1 of 1
Thursday, April 29, 2004
Park & Recreation and Pedestrian Trail Funds
April 30, 2004
Assets
Cash and Investments
Park Capital Fund
Trail Fund
Total Cash and Investments
Receivables:
*Pheasant III
*Hunters III
Total Receivables
Total Assets
Liabilities
Contracts Payable:
**LaMotte Parking Lot
**Skate Pad
**Clearwater Trail
**Warming House
**Playground LaMotte
**Picnic Shelters
**Redesign TraGi McBride
**CR #14 Issues
Total Contracts Payable
Total Liabilities
Projected Fund Balance
Total Liabilities & Fund Balance
$314,429
$12,500
$326,929
$87,000
$120,000
$207,000
$533,929
$108,000
$30,000
$150,000
$20,000
$45,000
$30,000
$25,000
$25,000
$433,000
$433,000
$100,929
$533,929
* Contingent upon receipt of signed developer's agreement
**Contingent upon execution of contract
Anoka Conservation District
16015 Central Ave. NE # 103
Ham Lake, MN 55304
Ph (763) 434-2030 Fax (763) 434-2094
Anoka Natural Resources.com
.APH 1 3 2084
April 6, 2004
Jim March
1880 Main St
Centerville, MN 55038
Re: Avoiding Referenda: Creating Corridors During Development
Dear Jim March,
The Anoka Conservation District is seeking your written support for an application to the Legislative
Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCMR) for funding to provide local government units with technical and
financial assistance to develop a county-wide open space network. We would like to work with you and other
local decision makers to set aside important natural areas during the development process to ensure that we
continue to enjoy wildlife and nature-based recreation long into the future. The ACD strongly believes that the
most viable approach to protecting natural resources is for local governments to partner with land developers
during the platting process to set aside some areas in exchange for platting flexibility. In this way, the
taxpayers will be assured of future recreational options without having to pay for costly referenda for land
acquisitions to meet demands.
With the funds we are seeking we would like to work with 4 or 5 communities to clarify local goals and a long
term community vision, define open space goals and develop different tools that protect open space during
development. The program would start in July 2005 and end in June of 2007. This would, in effect, provide
four or five communities with a quarter time employee for two years. The LCMR application also requests
funds to cover the expenses of two land protection projects in each community involved with the program.
If awarded the funds, four or five communities will be selected to receive assistance through a competitive
process established by the ACD. The Anoka Conservation District has worked with several communities in
Anoka County to identify regionally significant natural resources. We would like to continue working with past
partners and new ones to ensure the natural areas we now enjoy will remain for future generations.
While your written support at this time does not obligate you to be involved in the future or necessarily mean
that you will be selected as one of the communities chosen to receive assistance, your support for this
proposal will be very helpful to make it through the LCMR. We have included an example letter of support for
your convenience.
2JZ -~ ~
Chris Lord .
District Manager
Anoka Conservation District
Enc. Avoiding Referenda: Creating Corridors During Development flyer, example support letter
LCM.R
ANOKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
"One of every three residents thinks that
the most attractive feature of the Twin
Cities is the parks/trails/lakes and natura!
resources."
MetCouncil Resident Survey 2003
Unlike Other Programs
. Locallylead
. Relies on partnership between the
private and public sectors
. Project based on locally shared long
term vision for the community
. Protection efforts are solely focused
on open space under immediate
threat of development
. Land protection costs off-set by den-
sity adjustment
. Protected open space can remain in
private ownership, as with home-
owners' associations
. No net loss of housing
. Increases tax base
. Uses variance from ordinances in-
stead of cash to protect open space
. Building local capacity will result in
benefits continuing to multiply over
time
. Creates an approach that can be rep-
licated throughout the state in all size
communities interested in protecting
community open space.
Contact Chris lord for More Information
16015 Central Ave. NE Suite 103
Ham Lake, MN 55304
Phone: 763-434-2030 x13
Email: chris.lord@anokaswcd.org
Project Purpose
Establish corridors for people and wildlife to:
. Provide recreational opportunitiesr
. Protect water quality and wildlife habitatr
. Preserve rare speciesr and
. Promote healthy communities.
Project Approach
Provide technical expertise and financial assistance to
minimally staffed local governments to:
. Establish a vision for their communityr
. Develop local procedures to achieve their visionr
. Utilize ordinance flexibility instead of cash to pur-
chase community assets,
. Work with developers on a voluntary basis to pre-
serve open space during developmentr and
. Protect 100-300 acres of open space with
$100rOOO.
Immediate Need
. Communities with the best opportunities have in-
sufficient staff to take advantage of them.
. Rapid loss of the highest quality natural resources
and preservation opportunities in the metro area
. Minnesotan's value wildlifer huntingr fishingr trails,
open space amenities and clean water and the de-
mand for these services is increasing.
ACD Expertise
Anoka Conservation District has what it takes to get
the job done.
. Long history providing technical assistance to
communities for natural resource inventoryr moni-
toring, analysis, planning and management.
. Administration of grants is central to ACD opera-
tions with dozens of grants and contracts adminis-
tered annually and total grant revenues exceeding
2 million in the last ten years.
Name
Street
City, MN #####
April 8, 2003
Anoka Conservation District
16015 Central Ave NE #103
Ham Lake, MN 55304
Re: LCMR Application, Avoiding Referenda: Creating Corridors During Development
Dear Mr. Lord,
On behalf of the CITY NAME I would like to extend our support for the efforts of the
Anoka Conservation District to continue providing open space planning assistance to
local governments and residents. We would like to protect important natural resources in
CITY before they are lost forever.
The Anoka Conservation District is well suited to carry out open space planning and the
implementation of local natural resource goals. We would like to work with ACD in this
effort to facilitate community development that benefits citizens and the natural
environment.
I hope you are successful in your application.
Regards,
NAME
CITY, POSITION