The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2005-08-03 P&R Packet CITY OF CENTERVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION AGENDA Wednesday, August 3, 2005 - 6:30 P.M. L CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call n. SET AGENDA m APPEARANCES IV. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES 1. July 6, 2005 Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes VI. COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1. Oath of Office - New Parks & Recreation Members Ms. Linda Merkel & Mr. Kevin Amundson 2. 2006 Budget 3. Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park Play Structure 4. Frozen Fete des Lacs - Parks & Recreation Possibly Taking Over Friday Night Event of Skating, Horse Drawn Hayride & Bonfire VII. UPDATES 1. Acorn Creek Park Satellite 2. Tracie McBride Memorial Park Renovation 3. Park Dedication Fees for Centerville Redi-Mix 4. St. Paul Water Utility Property on Centerville Lake 5. Wheels Skate Park Equipment 6. Additional ~ights at Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park 7. Church ofSt. Genevieve Trail 8. Pheasant Marsh, Phase Three - Trail IX. ADJOURNMENT Parks & Recreation Conunittee Meeting Minutes July 6, 2005 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, July 6, 2005 - 6:00 p.m. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Parks and Recreation Committee of the City of Centerville held the regularly scheduled meeting on July 6,2005, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. Present: Chairperson T edd Peterson Committee Member Suzanne Seeley Committee Member Kathy Peil Ms. Linda Merkel Mr. Kevin Amundson Absent: Vice-Chairperson Wayne LeBlanc lliJ[Ji)@[J)~[J@W@@] Council: Michelle Lakso. StatT: Kim Stephan I. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call Chairperson Peterson called the July 6, 2005 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting to order at 6:37 p.m. II. SET AGENDA Motion was made by Committee Member Peil, seconded by Committee Member Seeley to set the July 6, 2005 Parks & Recreation Committee Agenda as is. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. IV. APPEARANCES IV. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES Consideration of Mav 4. 2005 Parks and Recreation Committee Medin, Minutes Motion was made by Chairperson Peterson, seconded by Committee Member Peil to approve the May 4, 2005 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes as is. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. lof5 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes July 6, 2005 Consideration of June 1.2005 Parks and Recreation Committee MedinS! Minutes Motion was made by Chairperson Peterson, seconded by Committee Member Peil to approve the June 1, 2005 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes as is. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. VI. COMMITTEE BUSINESS Acorn Creek Park Satellite This item was added to the agenda for discussion per request from the City Administrator Larson and Mayor Capra as a written complaint was received from a resident. Council Member Lakso inquired as to what has been done or discussed in the past. Chairperson Peterson and Committee Member Peil stated this issue has been discussed for multiple years. At one time all the committee members went as a group to each park to determine the best placement for the satellites in each park. Currently there are satellites at 4 of the 5 City parks, with Royal Meadows Park being the only park without a satellite. The satellite at Royal Meadows Park was removed a few years ago because of vandalism at that park. The only park that receives complaints regarding the placement of the satellite is Acorn Creek Park. The placement of the satellite needs to be handicapped accessible as well as easily serviced by the satellite company. The Acorn Creek Park satellite has been moved multiple times to accommodate one resident and then it was unacceptable to another resident. The spot it currently is placed at was determined to be the best spot for all factors involved. Screening has been discussed and the committee priced wooden structures to be placed around the satellites, but if one park was done, they would all need to be done. The structures were expensive to build, even with volunteer labor. Pine trees were planted around the Acorn Creek Park satellite when trees were thinned from the Eagle Pass tennis court area, but the trees did not survive transplanted to Acorn Creek Park. Council Member Lakso questioned whether a permanent structure for a restroom has been considered. In discussing this option the committee thought the expense of this would be considerable and difficult to justify for one park and not the others, especially since Acorn Creek Park will never have ball fields. The way the play structure was situated on the property does not leave any room for ball fields unless at some future time additional property was purchased by the City. Acorn Creek Park does not have parking, which would also be a necessity if ball fields were added to the park. There would also be the issue of maintenance with a permanent restroom structure. One of the resident's complaints regarding the satellite at Acorn Creek Park was the odor coming from the satellite. Committee Member Seeley said that her experience with the park system is that if satellites are maintained properly they typically do not have an odor issue and she questioned whether the company we use for the satellites provides the city with the service we would like. Chairperson Peterson stated a few weeks ago at Acorn Creek Park the truck itself had an odor, but when the truck left the satellite was fine. The committee would like more information from the resident regarding the odor problem and have Public Works Staff try to determine exactly what the odor problem is so that it can be pursued with the satellite company. The satellites are currently serviced weekly. 20f5 " Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes July 6, 2005 The committee feels that the issue is mostly about aesthetics as it is unattractive to have a satellite close to your home, no one wants it near their home, but it is a necessity to the park. Committee Member Peil reiterated that the committee has already spent many, many hours on this issue and there are no easy solutions, even fencing eliminates accessibility to some extent. Council Member Lakso said she would talk to Mayor Capra about this issue and perhaps have the resident be proactive by notifying the city when the odor becomes an issue so Public Works can determine what the problem is. Participation in Fete des Lacs The committee discussed the volunteer needs and opportunities of Fete des Lacs. Tracie McBride Memorial Park Renovation Council Member Lakso requested this item be added to the agenda for a status report. The committee previously had a subcommittee involved with this project, but was put on hold waiting for a timeline of when the old water tower will be taken down. Since that time, two of the three subcommittee members have resigned from the Parks & Recreation Committee. Chairperson Peterson reported the new water tower will be online approximately in September 2005 and the old water tower needs to remain functional for a year following the new water tower coming online. Committee Member Peil and Chairperson Peterson updated the new members as to what has been looked at for this park. Committee Members had walked around the neighborhood surrounding Tracie McBride Memorial Park and surveyed the residents as to what they would like to see at the park. Ms. Stephan will provide the committee with those results at the next scheduled meeting. At the time there were residents interested in being involved with the subcommittee when the park is actually being planned. Chairperson Peterson explained it is a small park, approximately 2 acres, so the options are limited. The current play structure is outdated and has some safety issues with equipment that is in bad shape. A completely new play structure will be designed and the space utilized to the best advantage. Council Member Lakso would like to see the pond used as a focal point for a picnic area. Public Works Staff does do safety inspections on all the park equipment, checking for things like lost nuts and bolts and broken objects, which are then replaced. A safety audit is more intense and requires a specific license and has not been done recently or required by the state. A League of Minnesota Cities representative (insurance) reviews the parks yearly and gives suggestions as to what could eliminate safety hazards. VB. UPDATES Church of St. Genevieve Trail Chairperson Peterson explained to the new members that Park Dedication Fees will not be received from the Church of S1. Genevieve in connection with the new church building as the church did not sell or subdivide property. The city had a previous agreement when Goiffon Road was vacated to give the city a trail easement through the church property, but there were 30f5 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes July 6, 2005 problems with this when the time came to actually deicide where the trail would be. With the new building the trail easements will be included with the survey and in writing per City Council request. There are three small trail easements on this property to connect to existing trails with the City being responsible for the installation and cost of the trail. Committee Member Peil stated that hopefully we will be able to piggy back the trail with the parking lot of the church The committee went over the locations of the parks within the city and what type of park each is with the new members. Committee Member Seeley informed the committee that she adopted a wood duck house and requested Mr. Drew Johnson install the house on the little Peltier Lake park property near Peltier Preserve. Committee Member Seeley had this approved by Public Works Staff prior to the installation and she will maintain the wood duck house. St. Paul Water Utility Prooerty on Centerville Lake The Finance Director, Mr. John Meyer has submitted a DNR Grant Application for the purchase of 1601 LaMotte Drive. The City has not heard anything regarding this grant at this time. Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park Plav Structure Chairperson Peterson reported to the committee that a letter had been received from the Spring Lake Park Lions regretfully informing the committee that they did not have funds available at this time for the Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park play structure. The committee had requested $10,000. Committee Member Peil suggested the committee look into information on grants for the purchase and/or planting of trees as she felt that Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park is in desperate need of some shade. Chairperson Peterson said he would rather see an open sided structure for shade, but this does not really help in between the three (3) sets of ball diamonds. Committee Member Peil will look for more information and report back to the committee. Wheels Skate Park Chairperson Peterson stated all the new equipment has been installed and is actively being used by many residents. Committee Member Seeley said the sign however, has already been vandalized. Public Works staffwill take a look at it. Chairperson Peterson gave the prospective new committee members a brief history of the committee regarding projects, funding, park dedication fees, trail systems, etc. Additional Li2hts at Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park Public Works received a bid from Rivard Electrical regarding the installation of the additional lighting at Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park for the pleasure ice skating rink. Rivard Electric will be able to utilize wiring in the existing lights. The original amount approved by City Council was $3,000, this was in the event they would not be able to use the existing wiring. The bid received was $1, 595. Chairperson Peterson will talk to City Administrator Larson and have the work done as soon as possible. 40f5 PaIks & Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes July 6, 2005 Nomination of Parks & Recreation Members Ms. Linda Merkel and Mr. Kevin Amundsen Motion was made by Chairperson Peterson, seconded by Committee Member Seeley, to recommend to City Council appointing Ms. Linda Merkel and Mr. Kevin Amundsen to the Parks & Recreation Committee. All in Favor: Motion carried unanimously. Chairperson Peterson requested a discussion of the 2006 budget be included on the August 2005 Agenda. IX. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Committee Member Peil, seconded by Committee Member Seeley to adjourn the July 6, 2005 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting at 8:15 p.m. All in favor. Motion passed unanimously. Transcribed by Kim Stephan 50f5 ..' TO: Parks & Recreation Committee Members FROM: Kim Stephan SUBJECT: Appointment of New Members to the Parks & Recreation Committee DATE: July 18,2005 The following recommendation went to City Council for the July 13, 2005 City Council Meeting and was approved. Nomination of Parks & Recreation Members Ms. Linda Merkel and Mr. Kevin Amundsen Motion was made by Chairperson Peterson, seconded by Committee Member Seeley, to recommend to City Council appointing Ms. Linda Merkel and Mr. Kevin Amundsen to the Parks & Recreation Committee. All in Favor: Motion carried unanimously. IV. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City ofCenterville June 9,2005 through June 22, 2005 Claims 2. Centennial Fire District through June 17, 2005 Claims 3. Centennial Lakes Police Department Through June 9, 2005 4. EDC Chair Recommendation to Appoint Ms. Jennifer Dosch & Mr. Thomas Babcook to the Committee 5. ABDO, Eick & Meyers 2004 Audit - $16,980.98 6. KLM Engineering Water Tower Project - $11,317.50 7. Arnt Construction Co., Inc. 21st Avenue - $6,752.67 Motion bv Council Member Lee. seconded bv Council Member Lakso. to aoorove the Consent A2enda as oresented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. Park and Recreation Roueh Capital Fund Summary Feb 2, 2005 Data taken from John Meyer report and Park and Rec budget. Current balances: Park Fund: $317,000 Trailways Fund $12,500 Total $329,500 Projection: $207,000 Plans: St Paul Water property $253,000 Additional Skate Park Equipment ($3,000 from charitable gambling funds) Royal Meadows Renewal $1,000? Lights for 2nd skate rink $1, OOO? Lamotte Road Class 5 Trail (Done 2004) Trail from Meadow Lane to Lamotte Park Trail from Chauncy Barrott to Lamotte Parking Lot Warming House Improvements Clearwater Trail $60,000? 2006-7? Centerville Parks and Recreation Budget 6-30-200( ,,- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - ~ Update history: On 4/29/04 Added tables on Expected Expenses and Possibilities. On 9/4/03 Added mission statement and subcommittee detail at the end. Park and Recreation Income Amount Timeframe 20,000 Now 39,600 Now 7,500 Now House Renovation 25,229 Now 2,361 Now-2004 11,000 Now 1,500 Now 1,000 108,190 54,000 2003Hl ? 57,000 2oo3H2? 219,190 2003 231,000? 2()()4...2007? 450,190 2oo3-2007? 2,080 2003 13,750 2003 54,663 2003 70,493 Pro. ected Receivables Pheasant Marsh IT Buckbee Develo ment Subtotal Hunter's Cross' Subtotal I Exoected Exnenses Amount Timeframe Parking lot (per Mary Capra 4/28104) used to be 50k. curb and gutter 110.000 2004 added to cost annarentlv SJ\atePark pf;ld 3 Q,OQO 2004 Trail Qrant exnosure (likely hood of Qcttiwz Qrant is low?) 60.000 Possi bilities Amount Timeframe StpaulW aterPIop~rt-YJ;ost 2~5 3jlO() 2(lO4-2005? . { DUit..: &/6/1) o.Ieted: This docomumlrellecl8 dillCUllion i"om 1he 8/6103 Porlc llD:I Reaeoliro meeting. Expense budget items are sorted roughly by the timeframe and priority. Park and Recreation Expense Description Cost Timeframe Priority Capital Budeet Repair roof of warming house as needed. Lions to donate labor. 4,500 2003 AA Pave par~ lot in Lamotte Park (approved by Council June? 2(03) 55,000 2004 A Four bike racks, one per park (ji} $500. Acorn Park already allocated. 2,000 2004 B Form a subcommittee to design and renovate the warming house. 10,000- 2004-2005 B Note: The footings are inadequate for a second level Certain monies 20,000 have been allocated by the Council specifically for renovation Lamotte Park play structure 35,000 Redesign Tracie McBride Park to coincide with water tower 30,000? 2005-2006 A removal. Some items to consider: Replace border and fill in large playlot, IOk? Expand basketball area to full court, 4k? Add small picnic shelter, lOk? try for a grant? Remove 2 existing small pIaylots and move to large playlot New barbeque pit Possible relocate of wheels park 30,000 2004 A Bird and/or Bat houses in certain parks 300 2004-2006 C Possible purchase of some St Paul Water property or coordinate with 100,000- 2005 B Lino Lakes on a purchase 200,000 Coordinate possible desired items relating to the 4 lane Main Street 10,000- 2005-2006 A reconstruction proposed for 2005 or 2006 50,000 Community ~ardens, water, tillinlz., etc 500 2004 B Trails Class 5 trail from Lamotte Park to Meadow Lane (700' @$7). Note: 5,000 A also discussed on the park walk was ahemate use of Centerville road and the "temporary" road. The temporary road must not become a road because Anoka County does oot want a turn lane there. Background: Obtain easement or purchase a strip of land for a trail from Lamotte Park to Meadow Lane. This is a safety issue for people going to/from Lamotte Park. The land is currently church property. Note: On Dee 14,2002, Wayne LeBlanc talked to Father Fitzgerald about possible trails on cln1rch property. Father Fitzgerald was agreeable to trails on the edges ofthe property from Lamotte Park to Meadow Lane and from Lamotte Park north along Lamotte Drive to the cln1rch school. He did not want trails in the middle of the property as that would limit possible future development. He was also agreeable to a trail going through the church/rectory property somewhere to get to Main St. Details would all have to be worked, of co lUse. Asphalt for trail from Lamotte Park to Meadow Lane (700' @$10) 7,000 B Class 5 trail just east of and parallel to Centerville Road from 11,000 A Meadow Lane to Hunters Crossing trail (1500' @$7). This is also a safety issue for anyone who has to use Centerville Road. Anoka County has said there are no plans to construct a trail or widen a roved and allocated 15,000 B 18,000 A 25,000 B 5,000 B 7,000 B 7,000 B 10,000 B 50,000 Yearl A 500 Yearly B 2,000 6,000 Yearl 2,000 Yearl 40,000 Yearl AA A A A 500 Notes: . Grants have the potential to almost double the money. It can't hwt to pursue aggressively. . A proposed Main street "4 lane" improvement project may occur in 2005 or 2006. Trails for Main Street and other destinations should be coordinated with this improvement project as well as other possible city improvements. . Subcommittees formed include: o Writing grants to try to double our money (shehers, play equipment, trails, lake property, etc) [SllZi.!nneo Il,ll~W1!Ym:l o Redesigning Tracie McBride Park to coincide with removal of the water tower in around 2005 [SJ!?i.!D!l~RifbJlLd~bndr~] o Remvating the warming house [[eQQ,Ki.!lliYl o Designing and coordinating trails with nearby communities ['0Li!Y1Jt;,._S.WdllJll~,Jl,lli~J o Wheels park considerations. Equipment is apparently too difficult to setup and a permanent place might work better than the current double use of the hockey rink. Some possibilities are Acorn, Tracie McBride, Lamotte parks, and the area behind city hall LKi.!tl])',.Mdlt;,Ei<,:l:JarQ} Page 10f2 . Kim Stephan Sent: To: Cc: From: Dallas Larson [dlarson@centervillemn.com] Wednesday. July 20, 2005 10:54 AM 'Usa Abrahamson' tpplus5@aol.com; wayneleblanc@unisys.com; kathy046@aol.com; skseeley@yahoo.com; dakotamn@pro-ns.net; mmlaskso@yahoo.com; capria@comcast.net; Stephan Kim; Paul Palzer Subject: RE: Portable Toilet Dear Ms. Abrahamson: I have discussed your issue with staff and learned that the location of the portable toilet has been an ongoing concern. It was moved before after complaints from the public. The current location was chosen by the Park Board based upon all of the competing concerns that were known at the time. Since the Park Board chose the current location, it is not just a simple matter of our staff moving it. It will be necessary for you to discuss this with the Park Board to see if another location would be acceptable. The next meeting of the Park Board is August 3,2005, at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall. Thank you for contacting me, and I hope you will be able to work something out with the Park Board. Dallas Larson, Administrator -----Original Message----- From: Lisa Abrahamson [mailto:l_abrahamson@msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 10:16 PM To: dlarson@Centervillemn.com Cc: tpplus5@aol.com; wayneleblanc@unisys.com; kathyQ46@aol.com; skseeley@yahoo.com; dakotamn@pro-ns.net; mmlaskso@yahoo.com; capria@comcast.net Subject: Dear Mr. Larson, Mary Capra suggested writing you to ask for your assistance in relocating the satellite (porta-potty) located at Acorn Creek city park. Our home is the only home that specifically borders the park located at the end of Revoir St. As it so happens, the only satellite in the park is located approximately 15 yards from our front yard. We would like to suggest with all the open space in the park there might be a better spot to relocate the satellite so it doesn't have to border the only house next to the park. A suggestion of placing it directly north of the playground area has been made, but still very accessible. That would probably still geographically place it closer to our home than any other that borders the park. With the hot weather we have recently been having, just standing in our driveway brings an odor. It also invariably brings a sarcastic comment from anyone who visits us how it "must be nice to have a toilet in your yard." It presents an eyesore introduction to the park as the backdrop to the park sign introducing the park. There is also the safety issue we currently see where the door opens directly onto the path, so that if someone was riding their bike or running and the door were opened as they were going by, it would present a safety issue. There has been an argument that it needs to be close to the road so the service truck doesn't have to drive on the grass. We always see the service truck drive up to the 7/21/2005 Page 2 of2 satellite on the grass currently for servicing anyway. We see the city trucks driving directly on the grass to empty the garbage cans next to the playground area. That argument doesn't seem to hold true by what's actually happening. And even if it did, there's got to be a different spot that offers the same access that isn't right next to our home. Thanks for your consideration in this matter. Please keep us informed as to what further information we can provide or if you would like to meet us at the park to discuss alternatives or anything else you might need to understand our frustration. Sincerely, Loren & Lisa Abrahamson (651) 407-8031 7/21/2005 Summary of Tracie McBride Survey Results (October - December 2003)* Requested improvements (in order of positive respondents): 1. Picnic Shelter with picnic tables: 8 requests 2. Picnic tables (no shelter): 6 3. Full basketball court: 5 4 - 6 (tie). Soccer field: 4 4 - 6 (tie). Volleyball court: 4 4 - 6 (tie). Horseshoe pits: 4 7. Gazebo (enclosed shelter): 2 (one respondent indicated "Acorn Park") 8-10 (tie). BBQ pit with rock skirting: 1 8-10 (tie). Raised BBQ grills: 1 8-10 (tie). Street course skate park: 1 Also requested (written in): More playground equipment: 1 Walking path / tar: 1 Recondition / upgrade playground: 1 Open field for softball, football, etc.: 1 Tennis court: 1 Most common comments: 1. No skate pit / street course skate park (various explanations offered): 5 2. No street course skate park (various explanations offered): 5 3-5 (tie). No pop / water vending machines: 1 3-5 (tie). Keep this a "toddlers / baby / young kids" park: 1 3-5 (tie). Park needs to be cleaned up and weeded: 1 *Number of respondents =11 (approximately 45 homes visited during survey) . I TO: Parks & Recreation Committee Members FROM: Kim Stephan SUBJECT: Update on Park Dedication Fees for Centerville Redi-Mix DATE: July 18, 2005 The following excerpt is from the June 22, 2005 City Council Meeting Minutes concerning Commercial Park Dedication Fees for Centerville Redi-Mix: A W ARDS/PRESENTATIONSlAPPEARANCES Mr. Dennis Shudv - Centerville Redi-Mix (Fees and Char2es) Mr. Shudy addressed Council and asked to consider reducing the park fee for his development. He then asked that the $2,600 storm water fee be waived explaining that he has his own storm water system and he has run his own sewer and water to Centerville. He further commented that he would be putting in the costs to run sewer and water. Mayor Capra asked what the costs are. Mr. Shudy indicated it would be $25,000 to $30,000 to run sewer to his development. Mr. Shudy indicated he was asked to pay $4,197 for his parcel. Council Member Lee indicated that after Mr. Shudy purchased his property, but before he obtained the permit, the fees were raised. Council Member Lakso indicated she is concerned with reducing park fees as the City needs the money to fund park maintenance. Council Member Lee said he could see reducing the storm sewer fees as he has his own storm water system on site and would not benefit but the park fees are important to the City. Mayor Capra commented that there was an exception for the town home development because the process was in the works. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the fee structure is set and if the City is going to deviate from that then it needs to be a unique situation. Mayor Capra indicated that Mr. Shudy is running sewer and water to his parcel at his own expense and that would stub it down almost to 21 st Avenue. Council Member Paar indicated this is a unique situation as the fees were raised and created for commercial development during Mr. Shudy's development. Mayor Capra indicated she has no issue with waiving the sewer fees and agreed under these circumstances to reduce the park fee to $2,100. Council Member Terway indicated the City has a schedule of fees and asked whether this would set a precedent for reducing fees upon request. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that unique circumstances could justify the fee reduction and then said that the fact that this project was underway when the park fees were created for commercial development could be found to be a unique circumstance. Council asked whether there is any impact to the storm sewer system of the City. City Administrator Larson indicated that developers are required to do ponding on their site as weJJ as pay storm water fees. City Attorney Hoeft indicated it is a choice to hook up to City water and there are benefits to Mr. Shudy. He then said that he feels there almost has to be some water runoff to the storm water system from Mr. Shudy's property so there is impact to the system. Mr. Shudy indicated he has a half an acre of pond for water settlement and seepage and rain garden. Council Member Terway indicated that all developers are required to do ponding but a fee is still charged. He then said that there is room for negotiation on the park fees. Mayor Capra indicated she would be wiHing to reduce the park fees to $2,100 but leave the storm sewer fee as IS. Mr. Shudy commented that he understood the storm water fees but he was looking to try and reduce his extensive costs to hook up to Centerville's water. Council Member Lee asked whether developer's pay 100% of costs to run water. City Attorney Hoeft reminded Council that this is a choice and he suspects Mr. Shudy is making that choice because the costs of the weJJ and maintenance over time not just initial time is more expensive than running City water. Motion bv Council Member Terwav. seconded bv Council Member Lee. to approve a reduction in park dedication fees and reauire Mr. Shudv to pav $2.100 and the rest of the fees remain the same. The reduction is based on the fact that the plans for the property were submitted prior to the creation of the commercial park dedication fees. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-40~O R 1M"i ~ 1t. IVT:-'D ,.u LI.c.o J!i JiJL 1 8 2005 July 14, 2005 Mr. John Meyer Finance Director, City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 RE: FY 2006 Local Initiatives Grant Application for the Outdoor Recreation Grant Program City of Centerville, City Park Dear Mr. Meyer: The review and ranking of the Local Initiatives Grant Program applications have been completed. The Local Initiatives Grant Program inclu~es applications for the Natural and Scenic Area, Regional Parks (outside the metro area) and the Outdoor Recreation Grant Program. This review, which included a careful analysis of each application was completed by staff of the Local Grants Unit. About $2.4 million in federal Land and Water Conservation Fund (LAWCON) dollars, State Bonding dollars and State Environmental Trust Fund dollars were available for grants this year. Competition for the limited grant dollars available was intense. Only 14 applications, out of 86 applications submitted were recommended for funding. Unfortunately, your application did not rank highly enough to be recommended for funding this year. If you would like information regarding your application and/or suggestions on how your proposed.project might be revis.ed to make it more competitive, please call your grants manager, Audrey Mularie, at 651/296-4705. Thank you for your interest in the Outdoor Recreation Grant Program. Sincerely, ~ve -;?~ ~ Wayne M. Sames, Supervisor Local Grants Program DNR Information: 651-296-6157 . 1-888-646-6367 . TTY: 651-296-5484 . 1-800-657-3929 An Equal Opportunity Employer ft.: Printed on Recycled Paper Containing a '-1 Minimum of IO'K Post-Consumer Waste " MIM' TO: Parks & Recreation Committee Members FROM: Kim Stephan SUBJECT: FYI DATE: July 21, 2005 The following excerpt is from the May 11,2005 City Council Meeting Minutes concerning the Church of St. Genevieve Site Plan Review - Trail Easements. VII. NEW BUSINESS Church of St. Genevieve Site Plan Review - P & Z Recommendation for Approval Tom Wilharber of6849 CentervilIe Road appeared before Council as one of the two trustees for the Church ofSt. Genevieve and gave a history of the Church. Mayor Capra provided an overview of the comments at the Planning and Zoning meeting and noted that the landscape plan was accepted showing less than normal requirements but the normal requirement would have been 220 trees and the Commission did not feel that was necessary since the Church intends to continue to expand. Mr. Wilharber indicated the first building is a community center or gathering space and there will be a kitchen and bathrooms and mechanicals and at a future date there would be an administration building and educational building and then a larger church and possibly a gym and that is why they did not want to plant trees to be removed later. Mayor Capra indicated that Park and Recreation would like a trail easement across from Meadow Lane up to the City park and on the west side to connect. Mr. Wilharber indicated that he discussed the easements with Father Fitzgerald and he did not have an issue with it but the Administrative Council meets at the end of the month and will discuss it. He then said that he does not feel the easements would be an issue. Council Member Lee asked if Park and Recreation has seen the plans. Ms. Stephan indicated that Park and Recreation discussed it at the last meeting. Mr. LeBlanc indicated it was discussed and they would like to see trails along LaMotte Drive and some way to get from Meadow Lane to LaMotte Park. , Mr. Wilharber suggested that Park and Recreation come to the Church and ask for what they want and then the Church will discuss it and respond. City Administrator Larson was asked to send a letter to the Church outlining the request. Ms. Stephan indicated that Park and Recreation made a motion on this but she does not have that information. Motion by Council Member Lakso. seconded by Council Member Lee. to table for further information on the trails. Mr. Wilharber explained that there is no requirement for park dedication fees from the Church so the easement is of the Church's own free will. He then said that he has stated that he does not think that the easement would be an issue for the Church and asked that Council not hold up approval of the site plan for another two weeks. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that there is no ordinance requirement for the easements and suggested that Council consider approval of the plan and direction to Staff to work out the easements with the Church. Council Member Lee indicated that when the City vacated Goiffon Road there were discussions that the City would get an easement for trail around the lake and he would like something defined before approval. Mayor Capra clarified that the easement was not around the lake it was on the Church property but not around the lake it was east of the Church building. Council Member Lee commented that Park and Recreation thought it was around the lake. Mr. Wilharber indicated that the Church had no issue with it on the east side of the property but did not want an easement through where Goiffon was vacated due to liability and if the ground would ever be sold. VOTE: Ayes - 4. Nays -l(Capra). Motion carried. The following excerpt is from the May 25, 2005 City Council Meeting Minutes concerning the Church of St. Genevieve Site Plan Review - Trail Easements. Church of St. Genevieve Site Plan Review - P & Z Recommendation for Approval City Administrator Larson indicated that Park and Recreation had reviewed this development and made a recommendation to request an easement from the Church in the northwest and southeast comer of the property to allow connection to trails and City property. He then explained that Staff met with Mr. Wilharber to explain the request and was told by Mr. Wilharber that he did not think the Church would have an issue with the request. Mr. Wilharber indicated that he and City Staff met to discuss the request and then the Church Council met and agreed to provide the easements provided that the City pays for all costs associated with them. He then explained that a civil issue has come up with the survey and the adjoining property owner and the Church has agreed to give the 13 feet six inches in dispute to the property owner at 1680 Heritage with the restriction that if there is a continuation of Goiffan the Church would like to line it up and the Church feels those conditions can be worked out with Mr. Highland. Mr. Wilharber indicated that the Church has requested that the City install stop signs on the trail at the SW comer at the driveway so that traffic does not cross the driveway without stopping as a safety measure. Mayor Capra asked Staff to note the stop sign requirement. Mr. Wilharber indicated that the legal documentation would not be totally taken care of until the Church clarifies title for the easement but the Church is in agreement with the easements. Mayor Capra indicated that she and Council Member Lakso are parishioners and asked if that is a conflict of interest with voting. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that it would not be a conflict of interest. Motion bv Council Member Lakso. seconded bv Council Member Terwav to aoorove the Site Plan Review as recommended bv the Plannine: and Zonine: Commission with the information orovided concemine: the easements at this meetine:. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. Council Member Lee indicated he looked through the plans and this looks like it will be a great addition to the community and it seems to be very well thought out. Mayor Capra indicated that it would be a nice addition to the Community and the Church has always made its facilities available to the community for use. From: Dan & Mary Capra [mailto:netfalcon@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 9:27 AM To: georgie.hilker@metc.state.mn.us Cc: Meyer, John - Centerville; Larson, Dallas; Wayne LeBlanc; Palzer, Paul; Lee, Tom; Lakso, Michelle; Jeff Paar; Capra, Mary; Terway, Rick Subject: City of Centerville Good Morning Ms. Hilker, I would like to request your assistance as our Met Council representative in two matters regarding the City of Centerville. The first is the City of Centerville's desire to purchase a piece of shoreline property located in Centerville which is currently owned by the St. Paul Water Utility. We applied for a DNR grant for LCMR grant money to make this purchase, but were unsuccessful in that request. We currently are submitting a grant application for Federal Transportation Enhancement grant money for the purchase of this property. We are a City bordered by two lakes without any city access to either of those lakes. The St. Paul Water Utility owns the entire Shoreline of both Peltier and Centerville Lakes and is currently selling off this property. The shoreline property would be a great assets to our park system and is probably our last chance to gain lake property within the City of Centerville for our residents. The second issue is our application for a Livable Communities Act grant for our downtown area. We are a small community represented by your appointment to Met Council. Being a small community within the Metro we need your help and assistance more than many of the larger communities with greater staff available to be lobbyist for support of their projects. I fully understand the busy schedules we all have in our lives, but I would like to request an hour of your time to come to Centerville to see the areas and property mentioned above so you can better understand our needs. We will accommodate your schedule whether it be during business hours or evening hours. Please contact myself Mary Capra 651-653-1732 or our City Administrator Dallas Larson 651-429-3232 to arrange a visit to Centerville. Thank you for your time and consideration of this request we look forward to showing you around our community. Respectfully, Mary Capra Mayor - City of Centerville .1.' TO: Parks & Recreation Committee Members FROM: Kim Stephan SUBJECT: Trails - St. Genevieve's Property & Pheasant Marsh, Phase Three DATE: July 27, 2005 St. Genevieve's ProDertv Added to your packet is the recommendation to City Council from the Parks & Recreation Committee regarding the trail easements on the 81. Genevieve property and excerpts from the City Council Meeting Minutes with Council's response. This was included as information for new members, but also as review. When and how would the committee like to proceed with this item? Pheasant Marsh. Phase Three Also added to your packet for review is information regarding the Parks & Recreation Committee's recommendation to City Council for the trail in Pheasant Marsh, Phase Three. This development was put on hold due to litigation in October 2003. The development is now moving forward, though a timeline is not currently available. . I TO: Honorable Mayor & City Council Members FROM: Kim Stephan SUBJECT: Parks & Recreation Committee's Recommendations DATE: May 16,2005 Preliminary Plat for the Church of St. Genevieve The committee discussed what trail proposal they would like to recommend to City Council for the Church of St. Genevieve's preliminary plat. Chairperson Peterson questioned whether the Church of St. Genevieve will be required to pay Park Dedication Fees and would like to know what fees have been waived for this project. The committee would like to see a trail connection on the northwest/north comer of LaMotte Drive and Heritage Street to the existing trail that runs along LaMotte Drive. There is an existing utility easement on this comer. City Council previously approved Dressel Contracting doing a subcut for a trail extension on the southwest comer of the property from the existing LaMotte Drive trail north of the lift station. The lift station is in the southwest comer and the existing trail runs into the parking lot at the entrance of the park. For safety issues the committee would like to see the trail on the north side of the lift station emptying onto the current temporary trail so bikers do not have to go into the parking lot from the trail. The committee would also like to recommend a trail extension from the temporary trail in the southeast comer of the property to line up with the Meadow Lane sidewalk on the east side of Centerville Road. Chairperson Peterson will determine the footage as it is unknown at this time Motion was made by Chairperson Peterson, seconded by Committee Member Peil to recommend to City Council that trail easements be negotiated with the Church of St. Genevieve for a trail connection on the northwest/north corner of LaMotte Drive and Heritage Street to the existing trail that runs along LaMotte Drive, a trail extension from the existing LaMotte Drive trail north of the lift station to the temporary trail in the southwest corner of the property and a trail extension from the temporary trail in the southeast comer to line up with the Meadow Lane sidewalk on the east side of Centerville Road. All in favor. Motion passed unanimously. Memo... TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members FROM: Kim Stephan SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Committee Recommendations DATE: October 3, 2003 Pheasant Marsh. Phase Three - Trail Chairperson Peterson requested a discussion of the trail through Pheasant Marsh, Phase Three be added under Committee Business. Chairperson Peterson started the discussion by saying the original trail proposal winds through the east side of the development in a low area. There is quite a bit of green space, probably because it is low. What Chairperson Peterson would like the committee to consider is readjusting the placement of the trail along the far east edge where there is higher ground and the trail would overlook the edge of the pond on the adjacent property. The original proposal shows the trail ending at Outlot A, Center Oaks II, with the idea of the trail eventually being continued east to 20th Avenue. Chairperson Peterson proposes a trail stub be added heading north across Outlot A to Center Street. If the trail cannot be connected to 20th Avenue in the near future, at least this trail would continue to Center Street instead of dead-ending. The trail stub would be paid for from Parks & Recreation trail funds. Chairperson Peterson estimates the stub to be 270' - 300' in length. The committee felt this was a better alternative to the trail dead-ending and not being used by residents. Chairperson Peterson also reported there is a 6 foot county ditch which runs through this property to the south. It will be necessary for a culvert to be installed in the south-east comer. Council Member Lee suggested attaching a map with the suggested changes to the motion for the next council meeting. Ground Development is currently looking for approval on the Developer's Agreement and Final Plat for Pheasant Marsh, Phase Three. Chairperson Peterson will supply Ms. Stephan with a map of the proposed changes/additions. Motion was made by Chairperson Peterson, seconded by Committee Member Seeley to recommend to council adjusting the trail location for Pheasant Marsh, Phase Three and adding a trail stub through Outlot A, Center Oaks IT with the funds for the trail stub to come from Parks & Recreation trail funds. Please see the attached map for trail placement. All in favor: Motion carried unanimously. City of Centerville October 8, 2003 COWlcil Meeting Minutes A TIF District may also contain south of Public Works for the proposed water tower location and the dOMltoMl area. Council set a work session for Monday, October 20,2003 at 6:30 p.m to discuss TIF and economic development. 3. Ordinance #4 - Zoning Pennit Amendment (Accessory StructureslFences) Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Staff had proposed the idea of a pennit for accessory structures and fences to the Planning and Zoning Commission previously as a way of eliminating or reducing some of the issues Staff has with them, but the Planning and Zoning Commission was not in favor of adding another permit fee. She then said that Staff would like to suggest that the pennit fee for accessory structures and fences be reconsidered. COlDlCil directed Staff to have the Planning and Zoning Commission discuss the matter and come to Council with a recommendation on an appropriate permitting fee for accessory structures and fences. Mayor Sweeney asked that Staff and the Commission consider the fee carefully and assure that it covers Staff time but is not too high because the pennit process will not help Staff if residents feel it is too high and do not apply for pennits. 4. Parks and Recreation Committee Recommendation Council indicated this recommendation should be held over until it is determined whether the development will proceed. VIII. OLD BUSINESS 1. Pheasant Marsh. Phase II1- Developer's Agreement & Final Plat Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated this item was tabled from the last meeting. Council Member Capra asked whether there had been any progress on the issue of the WaIver. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that he has no issue with regard to the sidewalk, trail ways and mailbox language added by Staff. He then commented that Mr. Runkle may wish to comment on the escrow for the mailboxes. Mr. Dale Runkle, Ground Development, indicated that he does have a concern about the escrow for the mailboxes as it was not required in the other two phases and mailboxes were installed. He then said that they have arrangements in place to have the mailboxes installed and he does not feel the need for another escrow. He also commented that he does not see where the ordinance requires it. Page 6 of 14 City of Centerville October 8, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes Mr. Runkle indicated he was concerned with the language added on the top of Page 6 where it says the developer will construct concrete sidewalk on the north and west side of Dupre as the feasibility study for the street and utility improvements included the sidewalk and that will be done at the same time. City Attorney Hoeft suggested amending the language to state that the sidewalk comes under the street and utility improvement by indicating the developer hereby requests the City construct a concrete sidewalk. He then indicated that he would work out the language and provide it to the developer. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the Parks and Recreation Committee had asked for language in the developer's agreement to ensure that the sidewalk and trailways were constructed. Ms. Karen Marty indicated she had nothing new to say with regard to the waiver. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if the developer was willing to sign a new Waiver. Ms. Karen Marty indicated the developer is not willing to sign a new waiver. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked for the options from the City Attorney. City Attorney Hoeft indicated the City could proceed without a waiver, make the assessment and wait to see if the amounts over the waiver will be contested. He then said there is a cost to defend a contested assessment but he feels the developer's agreement obligates the developer to pay for those costs. He further commented that, other than for entertainment value, he does not know why the developer would challenge the assessments because he feels that the benefit can easily be proven. Council Member Capra indicated that Ms. Marty had stated that there was an original waiver in the original agreement and that is why they do not want to waiver this agreement. City Attorney Hoeft indicated the developer says the City approved the development plan for all construction and waived up to $1.8 million so that is what they are obligated to so the question is whether the City is obligated to do the 429 process on this portion of the land and he is not convinced that the City is. He then indicated that the City has given independent approval by this body for each phase and just because it is indicated in the initial agreement that the City would proceed with the 429 process with a waiver of X number of dollars does not commit the City to going forward with 429 process. He further commented that the interesting question is if the City does not go forward with 429 process for the fmal phase and waiver of $1.8 million he would anticipate that the developer would say that the $1.8 million was for a three phase project and try to factor Page 7 of14 City of Centerville October 8, 2003 COIUlcil Meeting Minutes out the first two phases so the City may have an assessment challenge even if Phase III does not go forward. Mayor Sweeney indicated that he is nervous due to the comment that Ms. Marty made that the developer was not consulted when the bids came in higher than the estimates. He further commented that makes him feel that if this goes forward and the amounts are over the $1.8 million the developer will contest it and the City is faced with legal costs to defend. Mayor Sweeney asked what the original date for Phase III was before it was moved up. Council discussed it and thought that the original date was 2006 but was not sure. Council Member Capra commented that the City was shorted approximately $130,000 with the first 429 process. She then asked if Ms. Paulseth had the exact figures. Ms. Paulseth indicated that she has been figuring about $150,000 depending upon interest rates. Council Member Lee indicated he is not interested in moving forward without the waiver. Council Member Paar indicated he does not want the City to get stuck again with extra costs to develop the property. He then said he does not understand how they can contest something that they gave the City the authority to do through the 429 process. Council Member Broussard Vickers commented that the City did not lose the money because of the waiver issue, it was lost because of the bonding situation and prepayment. She then said that this bond would be set up differently to account for early payoffs. She further commented that the City knows that the costs are going beyond the $1.8 million and it is likely that the developer would contest the amounts over that amount. Council Member Lee indicated that, based on comments made previously by the developer and counsel, he would assume there will be a challenge. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked how the City would deny the 429 process. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that not approving the developer's agreement would mean the 429 process does not go forward and the developer would have to finance the project differently. City Attorney Hoeft indicated there would be a different development contract for improvements with escrows required and the developer would need to have its own engineer and own contractors and the work would have to be done to City specifications. Mayor Sweeney indicated the developer would be responsible to pay for City inspections as well. Page 8 of 14 " City of CA:ntelvillc October 8, 2003 C01DlCil Meeting Minutes City Attorney Hoeft asked Council to provide direction to the developer as to how it wished to proceed. Mayor Sweeney indicated that Council wants to see a waiver for the costs for Phase III or it is not prepared to move forward with the 429 process. Ms. Karen Marty indicated that they were aware that COlIDCil might take this action and she thinks they have discussed everything that they are going to discuss and could not bring anything different back at another meeting. She then said that, unless Council has specific direction for them, she does not feel it is necessary to table the matter. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the City is not asking the developer to assume financial risk but is just asking the developer to pay the assessments for what the property improvements cost so the City is ensured that the costs are not picked up by the City. She further commented that this is not a case of beefing up the costs, the costs are what they are for the improvements and the City wants the developer to agree to pay those to limit financial risk to the taxpayers of this City. Council Member Capra asked if the developer was open to considering financing the improvements rather than the 429 process. Ms. Marty indicated the developer did a waiver based on the estimate for 429 improvements for all three phases. She then said that they believe that the City has some obligation to follow through with its side of the bargain which is to construct those 429 improvements. She then said the City can do what it wants and the developer will respond accordingly. She further commented that it is unfortunate that the City incurred costs but she does not see where it is possible for the developer to write a blank check to the City for a waiver. COlIDCil Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the City is not asking for a blank check but an additional specific amount on the waiver for the costs for Phase III. She further commented that the assessment was an estimate and all parties knew that in the beginning. City Attorney Hoeft responded by indicating that the original waiver did not obligate the City to construct under the 429 process. Mr. Peterson indicated that he is in the process of working with Staff on the numbers for Phase II for the assessment hearing on November 12, 2003 and he expects to have those figures for the next meeting so that the City will have a better idea of where it is at on the $1.8. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that counsel for Ground Development has already initiated a challenge to the assessments whether it is a challenge to Phase I, Phase I and II or Phase III, there is a challenge riding out there. Page 9 of14 , City of CenteJville October 8, 2003 COIUlcil Meeting Minutes Council Member Broussard Vickers asked how the developer could challenge when they agreed not to. City Attorney Hoeft indicated the developer felt that what was being assessed for Phase I and/or II was somehow more than what should have been assessed under the estimated costs. He then said that brings back the comment that, if the City does not go through with Phase m, and the developer challenges the City on whether it is obligated he anticipates that the developer will follow through with the dispute on the assessment for phases I and II over some extrapolated number over the $1.8 so there may still be an issue with one and/or two. Ms. Marty asked what Council did because she heard a public hearing opened. Mayor Sweeney indicated that the noise ordinance public hearing was opened but no one was present to speak at it so the Pheasant Marsh matter was moved up to accommodate the parties. Ms. Marty commented that Council looked at this issue that is on the agenda and chose to take no action. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that was correct. Mr. Runkle from Ground Development and his counsel, Ms. Marty, left the meeting and returned a minute later. Ms. Marty then asked for permission to address Council. Ms. Marty indicated they would like to request some action one way or another on the matter. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that Council did not have to take any action as this is a negotiation over the development agreement. He then said the agreement, as proposed, is not acceptable to Council and Council has indicated what it wants the developer to do and, until there is a revised development agreement, there is no approval. Council Member Capra commented that the developer needed to take out the 429 or add the waiver in. Council Member Capra asked that Ms. Marty and Mr. Hoeft work on the matter. City Attorney Hoeft indicated he would look at any proposed additional language or would anticipate receiving pleadings. 2. Resolution #03-054 - Water Tower Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded bv Council Member Lee to approve Resolution #03-054 as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Page 10 of 14 J! jr"~:: ~ [, 8 2 ~ < 11 I ~ 1;::::l: l "Y' ."" / 7 6 , f 8 5 ~f 9. 4 / 10 3 1'~ 1 ~; 7 8 9 ,010 11 12 S r-- 6 16. 0 688 5 R f:::: 10 9 8 I,., 4 :1: g 3 .... 2 ~ 1 R ;; 1664 15 PARCEL 36 MOTTE PARK I lJ - ~ .... ~~ ~ Q 18,/ 19 ./ 17" 8~.' ./ ~ 120 1~ ~~ ,....: 0 '; 21 26 @ ~ ~ : 22 23 L 241\.~ ~ ~ '!a '167' ,,12:t1l.. ~()~ ~ 1.... (.0' :"" '6781'686 169. ~~\.. ,662 '66~ 9 10 11 ~S i.6 8 7 j('., a. ~ .........11 V 4 ( 5 ,1 C \ \ ~""~ 0' ~. '4 I I 10 Ii' 3 I~ 11 11'-,2 ~ 7J712, If C.;g.A.il: \1;>'1" ; \ 181 91 ;:: 12 9 ;:: ~ ) ~798 o P F. s' W 10" 'D n ~V II:: 2','3<..-7,1 fL1e5 (~1 1 JUDICIAL n'T,,-, ,,, ~ 1 J I-- 2 1/ I ~'"- -' 'I ",-...; ~ it 3 4 c- --1~. 14 15 118 :0' Oc, . 5 8 7 12 c> ,.c-' ~' ..... 9 10 ~ ..... 3;:J.v_~'A~\ .l~ #~~'l" 70<9 18 -" ~~')' ..... ~F3 7063 ::0 Eij 7<)1\0 (,V 6 7 -' ~~. ~ 0 g 38 ~'l"9 8 % . 19 21 22 23 $\~'i:. ~ ;>/s.. O'fif062 sfi/.8S 063 Q6' 5 ~ \ 7-40 ~744 1746 &~ '-' s> ",,.C'- 'C. ~ 20 \2<'32 7028 24- 11 I~\ ~\ 2 7058 Z " ,..., _ 4 9 '-' "1Q =.;.::: >0<,6' ;; ~11 7056 l1>.,(.. 0"", ~ 'TRAIL 'b .... 12 1757~:;: ~ ~ 35 ~ 3 10 O,J" ~ 1021 '" "T ----:..:. 17~5 "~a 7052 OJ1 p029 o~ -J 2:; n ;-D2m ':a~ I 7050 ~2 ./,11 12 13 14 15S: g .., ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ /- > . \ 16 ~ 28 g N I..... \ 8 R'TT ~ 0 I!? 2~' _~ ~;;'--- ~ t:HAUN~E!r- :: ,r:.. ':7':11 ~~1~:2 R 0 " 2 t: F- ~ ~ If 18 17 "S-) 2\ ~ GARud,b 8, ~~~!VB ' f'-.......... - ..---rr-- ~U,o~ONEER lAN~ /~~~ ~. ifffJOOM~O It 11~"Jgl~ftiJ~' r'~rsi" ~~ ~ 314 T\, 8 7 ~~,7!!" ,~ ~ 41~~~\~\11~~~1~~ -i~1 { ~ 1 ~ ~ m 20 n~, ,~~ I..~, 1.'-;, I n.~ I".". 1763 ~ -f." 6 ""~. ~~~~ '\:.Y , )> 6998 ~997 , ~ 1t--.169~~ I LE 'TR"IL ~ ~ MEAl OW LAN!:. ::; 0 I". 9V\ ~ EAG ..... 2:;; 19 . 5 ~ '1-'9815 ~ ~8', . ,_ ~ 17~'1'~21:;' '1t \ 45 ~ ~ 21 22! ~ 4 illnJ ~/: ~ 6 8~ ~~ :8 ''i..................! 191~ /1': ~ 6 ~ ~~ 20 23 * 3 - ~ 1 ".,::, ~ \ \l~ .;~ 4$f~I\;:.U ~ ~:C915 "- () r." . 9 ., ~ .., 2 R <; C ^, ( 1 'CL.--- (' !.)~" 1 ~ 1 ~ ii': 8 7 1~'f{~60~'.. 89~0 7 ~:F-~ 19 ~,,240!fl g\2 - t-,t--\IJ"--d("'4G~t;lB~~5 .1~ ~.... lD , 11 ~ ~ ~W $ 1 \. ,;l ~* ~ ~ - '10 12 9l 2 ~ :t.. r' j\l 12~ . 8951 6.71 6973 91 h.l:f!, ~ 956 \1 EAGlE ~ 6~~0 698> 6.1, t- 5 ,"1 14 15 18 Dv'/ 27 \. PARK c.. ki!:: 3 4 /, 1/ ''''~,\ 12 ,. I '" 9 10 '~17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 18 17 _ :' 18 N 1705 1713 1721 1729 17S7 17.05 7753 1761 1789 1777 1785 1793 1801 1809 1817 1825 1833 '8<1 I ~ 2 8 ~59'1 9<e~ 11 / WI' \ 9 19\1 1925 1933 d CENlER STREET '" ~. r:', 15 ,9" ,S1REET Z \704 1708 ~ ~ \1736 1744 1752 1760 1788 l'n~ //--- ....!2! 1600 1'808 W 1832 1840 i Q '::: 3 I 7~", ~ 120'" '\.' ~ 0- 193' ~ 1 2 ~ ~ 9 \ 10 l~r n 'I:~ YQ 18 ~:s 4 I 5 g 12 13 1 ~ " i ~ ~~~7~"O 0"> 2 ~ ~ ~ ,:dO j ., ~ ~ 8 t;5tv It. 012 13/'4 'i 17 fl h 3 6 $ ~ ~ 11 2 ~ ~ 4 5 6 ~ ~ ~ 13 f../ ''', 23 ~ ~ ~ 8 '''4> '''6's ~., '\ / 18::! 0-- /!!!! l' ",,'" 0 1! "'..j C 1859 CENTER./ liS ' .. ( ~ \-:.;- \' 7970 : \90~ 9~'" 7" , 19 ....o~ ~ ~2A 2 ~V.6'907 ~o'O,~OJ 10 I 3 g 1850 1658 Ul66 187-4 1882\'~g,O('" ~..... /4 ~8A ~ 7 ~ < ~ e-- 4 5 \ 81... OUMT 9076900 12 5 6 , "W~ 3 8 9 4 g 1 2 3 I : A 5 8 17S7 1744 -1[ :l;IA I, ~ I OUtlOT C 10 ~ ~ ~M~ 4 ilTl :tWl ';> N ' 3 4 " ~ I ! ~ 9 '''~, J '.> 2 1;4 1m ~':::=P)offiRf66E--bl.NE-----~~\ , ,8 '!j, ~ 176 i { r ~ v ';>..J. AA&1R\OGE ~ / { 2 7 "',kfJ \759 1785 \ 1775 ,'l1c' , j'; v Ijj \ 4 3. , , 5 '71'U I "'5 il/I :~.~. ~,: ',i! ______ _~jJ 5 ' ~ 8 1 -fl\:JPRE--RGAD- .cA-D t e.: 3 ~.. ~ QS,: 1 ' 4 h-1 -.1)- 0) 9 ",OJ>- ~ -:\'?)t'J.. :!i' <( ~,n r ,I\..... 3 ~ ~1~110 12 co c.... ~'1) 2 ~ ~t-J ~ 11 ~ ::j ~ 11 ....:::: 0 2 2 1 I~I ~ ~ 10 9 r.. 110 :y.'O .......--- . ~i I" 1, ?i qqq, 6812 '" 84 ~tr\~~,t<:~ f '" . r ^' ; '____ ~~o>. o~ 0 I......<=- o I 6 '\1k1~ fA I \1eP '\ ... $ 1 2 ~ 4 ,.5 ,1"' ,/-' '1""2 3 1 '~;"os 8!l11" 7 1707 17'1.5 1721 1729'~ ;p 1 -1 J IS DUPRE ROAD ' \:::'0011.0T A 11 S1724 /I ... 5 4f/21 8 ~ ~ ~n:: 8 0 ~ ~ .... 20 g 1070 ~ ~ '" o :----:: 1858 lU2 ''''',,0 1,4[.0. .J .~f l,<-~'!i \',,:~.; 1880 raTIrg ,..: 3 0- 19 ~ 8 ... .... 0 ~~ 5 I=R ') 0... OR 8 ,lr, . ,\,\.1 0.'" 10 4 3 2 1 2 ~ If 12 ~t~ ^hv~ ,\).: g i~ ~9~ ~ ~} 15 ~ \ 9 ;!; ~ 1:0'l;- '''s 10 .... {~~;} . .... 0<, 'fjI' ---1 ~ 1716 1724 ~ 14 21 12 .>. 22 ~ ~ ~ "'0 '1-- tr.> ('ta --b 28 ~.... 27% 10\6 ~. 2Il I 252 23 24 " '" " " " "l ::r:::: 1922 1932 1:""~ EAGLE TRAIL ' /;> IN! v 192:J 19J1 ('\~~ L~>~n 9 10 ~ ." ,~J" n J',g't',g ., ~ '" " ~ ~ ~ '" 23 ., g ... ., ., ., ~ ~ ., '" ~I~, V' '-'-- "", ~ - ~Q'ij d'// ~ ~~ oo1l.0T 8 .., ~ ~ "- '" ~i,' ~ 'I fl/ A'll '--- ~ 1980 1988 2 "' <0 m '" j)., 3 I OOMT A '-.=- .., v 'ci ~ It) Z :r: () z < II:: e ci Z m :r: ~ 0 :1; ~ , 6 Z 5 I ~ (.) => o o .~ ~ ~:;.~ \ ~ II II 1990 ~ ~. ~ ~ o .... " .... .... ., R " .., R o ~ g o .... o ~ 4 ,51, I I -rOiht- jf .pl' .> ')UJ I !I 2050 _I 2070 7 ~ I 2 ~ 3 ~ :j",/ 0.'1 ;;:<'J 1::/ esl, C/. S- (] j,t.( r:Ar " 8 w => z !!;! < " .... " .... 9 l- e/) N ~ ~ g en lL! ~. < ~ Y...l..c;,~r... "' , ---..... f In . ~ 0 V 7 -.:. - ~"'0J...p'rc Z ~l.Drr, - - --::::..r:!!.."!O.J .;.J ~~ d Z o < o e:: ~ i IZ ~~ ~I "'I ~ o C'l ~ o " ., 22_ I <ri -' 1 'OJ- . F A1RVlEW SlREET 2010 203< 2062 2 3 VI L.. _ ROil 5 2025 . !e: I .1'1! J ".i 201. II', J .~ GAlEWN\"" ClRQE ,f-L 2 8 4 2005 2044 .1 ^Ri". pr' 7 8 1.lUEllER PIPEUNERS ... :i: I.&.. o >- I-- o CEDAR STREET I~ I' I I _-1 -- --'~f\-r-T-c- L> 1\ ^ 1/ c:: "JTL J \J I L...: I \ ( V I, r \ '--' I -~-1 -- " "" I I I L I ~ I r---~ . j I i . '---' --- J L__L_--1__~ L I 1- \ I )--1 I I I \--- "1 ~ /Z T \ "" "" I : '\--~ 9 -;':/ ~ \..../ -7 / ), /' 1 ^ , " '/, I / , \,// ,/' ,....., >< " "-J :; J ~~~ .' \..? =-6--- -no ___ /' I~/ ;:] / ~" ! I l I L1-J I - - I J ff 2~1 .. . I 1-~{J~LoL--1 I tJ1J t-J i~- il r I r:--;; i i, f! f; tlJ:L....J I ! , '-------' o ') L- ,..... r- f\ ITr- L> 'J L_' \j I L_ I \ ~ Lor -,- I I j ') L- ;- /i--- "-I ~ ---- ,---., I I I I I 2 I J I I I I I I I I I I I L--_____..J .3 I I I I I I I I I I I , I L-- I J I I I I I I I J I I I , I I I I I I L-_______-.l 1 --- o 41 ,----., I I I I : 5 'f I I I I I I I I I I l--______J 1 J I I I I I I I I I l--______J ---<w ----, I I I I I I I I , SB-7 I L______~--' 2 --~-- "- "- "- "- ;1 -z //* -..) , I / /- ~/ ,/ ,y -.~ - ---...P~G.E PlACE_ 5 ,4 J I 1---- ~ l, I \ \ j~-:> \' --. \..-- . . ;-- " \~; , \ '--- -----, r-------, -- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,\ I - --;-- - - - T---I r------...., I I I I f I f 4 I I I I I I I I 17 .. I 20 _ ..y' _____',\. ., ---~flOA(}----___ '\ ....... --~'. --_:// ", . ...... ....... "...".... ... .... ...................."...................."..........................."........................"...."........... ......... ........................................."".........."..................."..................",.,..~.....".................................."...."............... .............."... ....."...: \ '1 I -, -......... ..... " "', '- --" ----- ----- ~-----------, \ / I \ I \ 12, I \ I \ I \ I \ I \ L ------- r------, I I I I I I I I I ,: 11 i i I I I I , I I I I -.J L 10 9 ~~~. ~':":"i r-!~ , /I .~ ~j ',.:\-...........;..1 1 '; 'r I' ;-' j ~ " . \5 f lJ ^, \ .,1 '.:~L. j~ ('-::>,' ; Q ( ;'; /.) r----_______, I I I I I I I 6 I I I I I I I I I I I ( * ,/ \ .... \ r--- \ . - \ I ~ \ I \ \ I 4 -\. I . \ I :) I y /.2 I -----J L._ _ ------- -------- , ~.. \ \ \ , , ~ j \ I . I :_ _J L ---------- , -' ----------- I I I I , I I I I J r------, I I I I I I , I I 8 II I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I L _J ~ 7 ;:=""':;'."," '" ":::,.:' '::... ..... 'h":_,.~_. ..:r.:.=.;.~.~...._...._: ';:::::.':::::::::::::::::::::::.:. ..... "" .... r" _ ........................__... OUTLOT A N J /' \ .,...-/ I\^//C"' 011\( \~ ') L.... ,:..'< ..-. -, I ----- -- I ( I ~ , I I I f--,..-> . j L.._ i L-r -,. ""\ \../ A L--.! L. r r- - -.....1 / Ole. >- - > 6 >- tluJ .1"'" ,,\ \ ft.,~' _\('I,.~ .. -- (' -.... (""',\\oA r....\"\'0 '.. ~ \..... _, -.I . ~'-""",; \ \ r"""1 \..~J I'- '. j.j --; \ . - --f" ......, \..-' -~ ....r,. r~ I ,-.r<--V . .~ ':..), ~,...., '~~~1Jif1w~:~r'"~'~=~'I ti) J,A- ~ se tve. ~~J,v~ culw~{- .. . D r r-c...A - n I I I Centerville Benefits. From Efforts . Of Young. Volunteer. I By Deb Barnes Madison, 8, a resident of Centerville, has volunteered to care for thefiower plantings at Royal Meadows Park this summer. Her mother made it a family project last year, and when the opportunity came again to donate her time for a worthwhile project, Madison was eager to par- ticipate once more. Madison has planted the fiowers,and keeps _ an eye on the garden so it is. weeded regularly and watered when needed. The daisies are ,al- -. " I' '. _ _. _ _ _ . _ " . . . .'. '~; . __ -' ready atestament to her care. Tasha, a four-month-oldMghan houI,ld~)ee~s Madison will be a third grader this fall, but lo~s of attention - just like the flower ,garden.' she already knows what she wants to be when Thanks to Madison and other volunteers, she grows up: aveterinarian. She enjoys the re- '" Centerville'sparks will bloOIp. allsllIllillyr l U1~snSA~Uionv Allino;) -lu-eis!s. r:::U1pBJo.iu~riiissgssueifuuo!T!~a -MrS])ObTXpl~~~~nfftirp~lRgl;)---1 Madison, 8, has ,volunteered on behalf oj the City oj Centerville to care for a flower garden in Royal Meaa-. ows Park this summer. ,'- . ~ May 9, 2005 Mary Capra, Mayor City of Centerville 1880 Main St. Centerville, MN 55038 Dear Mayor Capra and Council Members, Thank you for your letter advising me of the appointment of Richard Terway as the new Council Member, and inviting me to apply for one of the vacancies existing on three of the city's committees. I appreciate this invitation as I would like to serve as a member on anyone of these committees. As I stated in my letter of interest for the City Council, I am new to the area having moved from Eagan in July of last year. I think this is a great place to live, and I have already observed growth and development in this area in the short time that I've lived here. I think it's exciting and I would like to playa part in. I have been employed by Dakota County as an advocate for Veterans in the County Veteran Services Office since 1991. Prior to that, I was employed by Control Data as a Buyer and Contract Administrator from 1974 to 1991 after earning my B.A. degree at Louisiana State University in 1972 and working for two years for the Louisiana Department of Public Welfare. I am available for an interview. My home telephone number is (651) 454-5465. Thank You, Linda L. Merkel