The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2007-08-22 CC Packet CITY COUNCIL & WORK SESSION MEETING AGENDA COUNCIL MEETING lVednesday,i\ugust22,2007 6:30 p.m. L CALL TO ORDER 1. RoD Call II. pUBLIC BEARINGS IlL APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF COUNc& MINUTES 1. August 8, 2007 City COUDd Meeting Minutes (Pages 1-6) 2. August 8, 2007 City CouneB Work Session Meeting Minutes (Page 7) 3. August 14,2007 City COUDd Emergency Meeting Minutes (Pages "'9) v. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City of Centerville August 9, 2007 through August 22, 2007 Oaims (page 10 ) 2. Centennial Fire District Claims Through August 15, 2007 (page 11) 3. CenteDDiaI Lakes Police Department Claims Throop August 9, 2007 (Pages 1~13) 4. Corrpro Annual Service Agreement Water Storage Tank/Clarifier - Water Tower 5495 (pages 14-16) 5. JlursehviBe Construction, IDe. Pay Request ##5 - 2'" Avenue Backage Road -198,411.98 (pages 17-21) 6. BursehviBe Construction, IDe. Change Order #4 - 20th Avenue Backage Road - 526,936.00 (pages 2~23) VI. A WARDS/PRESENTATlONSlAPPEARANCES VB. OLD BUSINESS 1. Street Constructiofa Project (Paaes 24-33) a. Set Date for Open Bouse b. Authorize SoD Boring 2. Sidewalk Proposals (Pages 34-37) 3. Mr. Tom Lee - Reconciliation of the 2007 Parade Budget vm. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resident Request for Reimbursement of Tree and Brush RelDov" 1. Proposed Water Supply Emergencies ()rdbumee Amendment (Pages 38-41) 3. Wellhead ProteetioD Plan a. Set Public Bearing b. Start Publk Notification Period 4. Proposal for Sod Replacement @ Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park (page 4%) 5. Res. ##07-OXX - Domestic Violence Awareness Month (Pages 43-44) 6. Tax Jnerement FiDandDg PIaa Proposal for KendaD Howard Project (pages 45-65) 7. Apply for Reimbursement (SCORE Funds-Anoka County) for TreelBrush ReIDoval Services IX. ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES 1. City Achninistrator, Mr. Dallas Larson X. ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING L CALL TO ORDER 1. RoD Call n. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION 1. 2008 Budget 2. 2008 Goals & Objectives 3. Emergency Preparedness Procedures Ill. ADJOURNMENT **REMINDERS** Pbmning &. Zoning Commission - September 4, 2007, 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers Parks" Recreation Committee - September 5, 2007, 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers Council Meeting - September 12, 2007, 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers Planning & Zoning Commission/Council Joint Meeting - October 2, 2007, 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers - Comprehensive Plan CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING August 8, 2007 6:30 p.m. Pursuant to due call and notice thereot: the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on August 8, 2007, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. STAFF: Mayor Mary Capra Councilmember Tom Lee (arrived at 7:37 p.m.) Council Member Linda Broussard of8d Council Member Michelle Lakso .... ..... . ... .... '" .... ..' . ..................... ". . {' :.; ==:O:Larson Mot APP~ ., . city Attorney Kurt Glaser city Engineer Mark Statz PRESENT: L CALL TO ORDER Mayor Capra called the August 8, 2007, City Council meeting to order at 6:35 p.rn. n. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Capra added item #5, Contractor Payment Request for Hidden Springs Park to New Business, and item #2, Thank you to Volunteers to AnnouncementslUpdates. Motion bv Condl Member P,ar. seconded bv Coundl Member '(,alnR- to aoorove the Henda as amended. .t\lI ~ favor. l\totion carried DBaahnouly.. m. PUBLIC HEARINGS None IV. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES 1. ~uJy 25. 2007 City Council Meetinll Minutes M,tioD bv ConeD !\fember 'Paar. secoD~ bv CouneD Member l.tnn. to aoorove the .falx 25. 2007 Citv ~ounciI MeetinG' ~ as oresented. AD la_favor. ~otieJl carried 3/1lMavor Caura ahml~e4\' 2. JuJy 25, 2007 C~ C'.nllncil Wotk SessiQU. Minutes / City ofCenterrille Cotmcil Meting Minutes August 8. 2007 :M;Otip bv ~ Member T,a1dA. seconded bv Coundl.ember p,.flr. to 8DOfOve the JuIv 25. 2007 em Council Meetint! Minutes as oresented. AD in favor. Motion carried. lMavor Canra flbUAined). v. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City ofCenterville l\11y 26, 2007 tbrouah AIJgu.lid: 8. 2007 ~lAimA. M,don bv COUDeiI Member T.akso.. 5eCOnde4j bv COUDeiI Member Broussard. to aoorove tIJe ConseDt A2enda items as fI~ended. AD ~ favor. MetioBS ~ unanm.oDS\Y. 2. Center\pi'JJ Fire Di,mct ClaimA tbro1Jp AUIl1st 1. 2007. ~OtioD bv COUDeiI Member ,..IdA. ~nded bv Couneil Member pflflr. to 8DOF8ve ltae Consent A2enda iteIIlf as flmendecJ. All in favor. "otiODS carried nnflnimouslv. VI. AWARDSIPRESENTATIONS/APPEARANCES None VB. OLD BUSINESS 1. Resolution #07-031 - ElectinlJ to Participate in the Anoka County Housing & Redevelopment Authority Economic ~elopment Activities. city Administrator Larson explained that this resolution authorizes Centerville to participate in the Anoka County Housing and Redevelopment Authority's economic development activities as presented by Ms. Karen Skepper, Anoka County Economic Development Authority during the July 2S, 2007 Council meeting. Mayor Capra questioned whether the City had a tax levy option with its EDA City Administrator Larson replied that the City did have that option. Mayor Capra commented that if the City could participate in the BRA and not commit to the EDA, she would prefer not taxing citizens with a County EDA Discussion ensued. Motion bv COUDeiI Member !a. seconded bv Couneil Member pAflr. to table Resolution #O7-03l - :E,~Il. to PartidDate in the Anob CODtv BOIII1'" & R4J1eveloDment Authoritv Economie pevelooment Activities until the Seotember 12- 2007 1DHfhu,,_ AIUD.Iav,r. ~otiOD earried onflnimouslv. Page 2 of6 2 - -- - - - ------------------ - - - ----- city of Centenille Council MetiD8 Minutes Aupt 8. 2007 vm. NEW BUSINESS 1. Proposed 2008 CP.ntennial Fife District Budget Councilmember Lakso stated that the increase to the Fire District Budget is mostly due to the rise in insurance costs. She explained the breakdown of the budget. Discussion ensued. M~~ ~":e .......... J>v p.uadI-.JJer .....r.llI.- th (;' . Distriet BD~ as DreseDted. AD;' fI!2L )lotion carried nnJndmouslv. 2. Pro,posed 2008 C..entennial La1ces Police ~ent BudJet Counci1member Lee commented on the 5.66 % increase to the Police Department budget. He stated that the board elected not to hire another officer at this time. He stated he feh that it would be more cost effective to hire another officer than pay the overtime. Discussion ensued. :~ c;: t:"':':~~~ bv ~ MemjJer I...... to ........... sed t ,IAt Ponee :penartment JpdHt as nresented. AD ~ favor. ~otion carried onAnimooslv. 3. llesolution#07-030-PrQCJAiming ~ 17-23.2007 as Constitution Week r.::.:=~"..:;."'" -.kd I!Y ~ Mem1Jer J.oe. to........e ___ __ a _!_ frodai~i"R *"tember 17-23", 2007 as Constitution Week. Councilmember Lee requested that staff add a link to the Constitution to the website. Mayor Capra requested that the newspapers also print the resolution. Councilmember Broussard inquired as to what happens to all the resolutions, proclamatio~ and motions made by Council over the years. city Administrator Larson replied that they remain in the records. 4lUDJavor. Mot;m r.arried DIIlARimoilSlv. 4. Centervi11e EJementarv PTA ReqJlest for TeqJOrarylEvent Bingo Permit Mayor Capra questioned City Attorney Glaser whether a state statue exists concerning the purchase of gaming ticket by the individuals sponsoring the event. Page 3 of 6 s - - - -------------------------------------- Ci1y ofCentervi11e Couacil MetirIg Minutes August 8, 2001 city Attorney Glaser stated that he did not have the answer but could find out ~~~~~j;.==~~ favor. Motion carried DIIAnimouslv. 5. QmttactOr's Reqpest for ~ent - Veit & (;oq>>any. Inc. Mayor Capra asked how much remain~ to be paid. city Engineer Statz replied about $64,000. Councilmember Lee questioned what changes were made at the park since the last payment. City Engineer Statz replied that not much has changed. He pointed out that several items on the request that were not on the previous request. Councilmember Lee inquired whether the rain garden is repaired. City Engineer Statz stated that the new rain garden rules equate to a .S-inch rainfall must drain within 48 hours after a rainfall. He indicated that the garden was measured and it aweared to not be draining adequately. He commented that major modifications to the drain tile were made and he believes this would correct the drainage problem. City Engineer Statz stated that 75% of the payment is requested because they believe the City is well.protected by withholding a percentage of the payment and with a performance bond in place from Veit. He stated that the work is guaranteed for a full year after the project is accepted. Discussion ensued. Mr. Dick Travis, 7335 Brian Drive, stated he took offense at the way Council beat up on the contraetor. He questioned Council as to why it would withhold money if the contractor buih the features to design and specifications. He pointed out the other SPeCifications he questioned. He stated that he believed nothing was substanda1d at the park. Councilmember Lee responded that Council believes the contraCtor performed well except for the rain ganlen. He indicated that Council did not know ifit was due to a design issue or from another reason. He discussed the other items from the list of concerns. He stated that the City intends to pay the contractor once it is satisfied with the work. Mayor QLpra stated that it is the City's goal to ensure everything is completed correctly. P.40f6 4 - -- ----- - -------- -----~------------ - --------~~- ----- city of CenterviUe CouDeil Meting Minutes August 8. 2007 Council completed agenda item X. ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATBS at this time and then recessed and reconvened at Hidden Spring Park to complete discussion on this topic. Council reviewed.each of the outstanding issues at Hidden Springs Park. City Engineer Statz explained what has occurred to resolve each outstanding issue. He stated that the contraetor worked on the rain garden and it seems to be working. Council members commented that the rain garden is as dry as they have seen it since the project started. Councilmember Lee expressed concern with the artesian well. He stated that the flow has slowed to little more than a trickle. He commented that he was uncertain if the draught cau~ the problem and if it would recover. Councilmember Broussard commented that she liked the stone water feature with or without the flowing water. Council reached consensus to approve the current pay request, as the contractor was receptive to correcting the problems. ~ '" ..;::0 .:::'" =:_ ~Dded by C-.dI Member ~ ': ~_~ fay _ "-~~ _! .. the .mODDt of $92.964.86 tl! Veil _ __ ..__ _J!! --.!!:. MoUo, ~ed 'PnJanim,~ X. ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES 1. City Admipistrator Larson City Administrator Larson reported on the financial report in Council's packet. He stated staff review of the Code would be held on August 23, 2007. He requested that Council members notify staff about questions or issues they would like looked at. City AdIninistrator Larson reported that the next joint CouncillP13nning and Zoning meeting is October 2, 2007. He stated that the primary discussion would cover the Land Use Plan as portion of the Comprehension Plan. City Administrator Larson reported that the City is considering implementing payroll direct deposit at the begipntng of the year. 2. 'Planning And ZoninJ r.nmmiqion MP.P.tinD Update Councilmember Broussard reported that a new business, Multi Web Converting, would relocate to Centerville. She reported that Multi Web Converting would present the site plan at the September 12, 2007 meeting. 3. Vob1nteers Page 5 of6 5 City ofCentervi1le Council Meting Minutes August 8, 2007 Mayor Capra thanked aU the volunteers for their help with the Fete des Lacs celebration. Mayor Capra R90rted that WWU veteranS anedaI by 9 were pl~the Motion bv COUDmmember Lee. seconded bv Cooneilmember Lakso. to recess to 1601 lAMotte Drive at 7:25 D.m. Mayor Capra reconvened the Council meeting at ffidden Springs Park at 7:35 p.m. All Council Members were present as well as City Administrator Larson, City Attorney Glaser, and City Engineer Statz. Discussion resumed on New Business Item 5, Contractor's Request for Payment - Veit & Company, Inc. XI ADJOURNMENT ~~~~;;~~~lIx~~berbM.!": 2007 n t! 8:05 em.. AD m favor. Motion earned ~ Transcribed by: Dianna \Vise, Recording SecretarY TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Page 6 of6 (p ---~--- -~--~- ----~-- --- - ---. -- - ----------~- -------~--- ===8:4SP.m. ot Present were Council members Tom Lee, Linda Broussard-Vickers, Jeff Paar, and Michelle Lakso. Also present were City Engineer Mark Statz, City Attorney Kurt Glaser, and Public Works Director Paul Patzer. Absent was Mayor Mary Capra The Council discussed the City Code and Kurt Glazer explained a proposed ordinance relating to ultimate fighting and drug paraphernalia. The Council agreed that the ordinances were probably a good idea. Statfwill be meeting in August to review the City Code and identify any changes that are needed. the code has been used for about two years and staff has concerns with certain issues of content and orgsni7Jltion of the code. Staff may present several proposed ordinances to address problems that are identified. The plan is to get: the adjustments made yet this year in order to print revision pages early in 2008. The Council reviewed the proposed budget: for 2008. The proposed budget would result in a levy increase of about 4.5%. It was noted that the single largest dollar increase is for police costs-that single item represents over half of the levy increase. The budget will be placed on the council agenda in early September for approval of a preliminary budget: and levy. The Council reviewed a report of sidewalk inspections provided by Paul Patzer. It was noted that there are 48 hazard panels on the public sidewalks and that a total of 275 cracked panels with varying degrees of concern. If all of the cracked panels were replaced and curb ramps were corrected to code in these areas the cost would be about $65,000. The Council discussed ideas about how to pay for the work, but the council seemed have a consensus that the city should pay for the repair and not assess the cost to adjoining property owners. Staffwill rework the list to keep the total cost below $50,000 and bring back a proposal for work to be done this year. The Council reviewed the list of goals adopted this year. Good progress is being made on most of the goals. The Council determined because of all of the major investments that are being made this year; that any work with regard to city hall expansion or alternatives should be deferred to 2008 or 2009. The Council spent some time discussing the C011'munity signs and suggested that staff explore some alternatives using the sign template adopted for the parks. The council discussed the Rehbein dirt operation which exists in the industrial area and what could be done to bring this property into compliance with zoning regulations. Staff will work to get: a commitment from the property owner to put a specific time line on concluding the operation. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 10:25 p.m. Dallas I..a.rson, Administrator 7' -- ~--- -- --------- --- ------ ------ - --- - --- - ---------- -- --- - -- CITY OF CENTERVILLE 08l17/0711:58AM Page 1 *Check Summary Register@ Name 10100 MAIN STREET BANK Paid Chk# 022631 10,000 LAKES CHAPTER Paid Chk# 022632 BRADLEY & DEIKE, P A Paid Chk# 022633 BURSCHVlLLE CONSTRUCTION Paid Chk# 022634 CITYOFWAYlATA Paid Chk# 022635 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC Paid Chk# 022636 GROGOINE, JAMES Paid Chk# 022637 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS Paid Chk# 022638 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH Paid Chk# 022639 MENARDS - FOREST LAKE Paid Chk# 022640 MET. COUNCIL ENV. SERVo Paid Chk# 022641 MICHELS CORPORATION Paid Chk# 022642 OFFICE MAX Paid Chk# 022643 OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE Paid Chk# 022644 PRESS PUBLICATIONS Paid Chk# 022645 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES INS Paid Chk# 022646 QWEST Paid Chk# 022647 REHBEINS BLACK DIRT Paid Chk# 022648 SAM'S CLUB Paid Chk# 022649 TRU GREEN - CHEM LAWN Paid Chk# 022650 VEIT & COMPANY, INC. Check Date AUGUST 2007 CheckAmt 812212007 8/2212007 812212007 812212007 8/2212007 8I22l2OO7 812212007 812212007 812212007 812212007 812212007 812212007 812212007 812212007 812212007 812212007 8/22/2007 812212007 812212007 812212007 Total Checks $60.00 P. PALZER & J. MCPHERSON MEMBE $1,230.00 CENTERVlLE MAINSTREET $198,411.98 BACKAGE RD & 21ST AVE UT & STR $49.90 T. BENDER & K SWEENEY MCFOA RE $105.85 SERVICE THRU JULY 2007 $400.00 ROAD SPRAYING IN FRONT OF CHUR $430.87 1 1/2 FLG MTR & 1 1/2 CAST IRO $38.00 JULY 2007 WATER TESTING $215.27 OPERATING SUPPLIES $12,344.38 SEPTEMBER 2007 WASTEWATER SER $420.00 REFUND DEPOSIT FOR METER & WAT $297.43 SUPPLIES $557.68 ANIMAL CARE $251.60 SUM. FIN. REPORT $21,245.43 SEPTEMBER 2007 INS. $55.51 426-6579 SERVTHRU 8-31-07 $53.76 BLACK DIRT $286.13 SUPPLIES $1,431.51 TURF CARE- CITY HALL $92,964.86 2007 HIDDEN SPRINGS PARK IMPRO $330,850.16 NOTE: THERE WILL BE AN UPDATED LIST OF DISBURSEMENTS FOR APPROVAL ON 8-22-07. IlJ ------- -- -.----------- -- ~------- ~- --~-- -- -- -- -- -~--~~ ----- -- ~--~ -~---~- CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Check RegisIer FIRE GL Page: 1 GL PosIing PerIod(s): 08107 - 08107 Aug 15. 2l1J7 03:59pm Check Issue Da1B(s): 08I02J'l1J07 - 08/1612007 Per Data Check Nc) Vendor Nc) Payee Invoice o..aIptIon Inv Amount 08J07 08/15AJ7 2810 20400 DAVID BRUDER SAFETY CAMP EXPENSE 141.12 08J07 D8I15107 2811 30485 CENTER MART FUEL 31.27 08107 08115107 2812 30490 CENTERPOINT ENERGY STATION 2 GAS 62.07 08/07 08/15107 2813 5012() EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAlNT, I~ STATION 2 GENERATOR 169.93 UTC 08J07 08/15107 2814 ElO85O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE STORI BATTERIES 11.68 08J07 D8I151J7 2815 80100 HSBCBUSWESSSOLUTIONS RATCHET TIEDOWNS 294.80 08J07 08/15107 2816 80201 I<ALU HAAPOJA SAFETY CAMP 120.00 PREPARATION & EVENT 08107 08115107 2817 80400 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY EQUIPMENT 3, 163.98 08107 08I15J07 2818 120450 CITY OF UNO lAKES JULY REIMBURSEMENTS 19,358.74 08J07 08115107 2819 120490 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INC COPIER MTC 9.06 08Kfl 08J15J07 2820 140075 NSRMAA FIRE SAFETY HOUSE 100.00 USE 08107 08115107 2821 140408 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS CELL PHONES 145.93 08107 08115107 2822 160100 PAPERDlRECT FEDERAL COMPLIANCE 75.98 POSTERS 08107 08115107 2823 170180 QWEST COMMUNICATIONS 214.28 08107 08115107 2824 190400 UZ SHEEHY SAFETY CAMP FIRST AID 149.50 KITS 08J07 08/15107 2825 220400 YON HANSON'S MEATS SAFETY CAMP SUPPLY 185.17 08107 08115107 2828 2<<)100 XCELENERGY STATION 2 ELECTRIC 769.23 T018I8: 25,002.72 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check )1 -------~-~ ~----------- ~- --- ------ ---- --- CENTENN1Al.lAKES POUCE DEPT Check Register pouee GL Page: 1 GL PoslIng Period(s): 08K17 - 08107 Aug 08. 2fJ07 04:52pm Check Issue lJa18(s): 0810112007 - 08J09I20f17 Per Dat8 Check No Vendor No Payee Invoice ~Iption Inv Amount 08107 08J01107 6355 160420 PITNEY BO'NES POSTAGE BY PHON POSTAGE 230.99 M 08107 08109/07 6358 10155 ACTION RADIO & COMM. INC EQUIP MTC 68.58 08107 08J09I07 6351 10590 AMERICAN MESSAGING AUG PAGER SERVICE 30.07 08107 08I09I07 6358 10600 AMSAN ST PAUl, IHe UNERSJDUST BAGS 61.58 08/07 08I09I07 8359 10750 ANOKA COUNTY 2ND QTR CDPD ACCESS 540.00 JUNE INTERNET 590.78 SERVICE To18l6359 1.130.76 08107 08109/07 636D 11565 ASPEN MILLS UNFORMS 291.84 08107 08J09I07 6361 20360 BlAUER TACTICAL SYSTEMS INC MCR READY SUIT 1.461.00 08107 08109<<)7 6382 30063 CP TELCOM PHONESlLONG OI8T 343.24 08107 08J09I07 6363 30075 CAMPION, BARROW & ASSOC. INC PERSONNEL TESTING 375.00 AI< 08101 0BI08JD7 6364 30480 CENTENNIAL UTlUTIES JUNE UTJLJTIES 381.02 08107 08I09I07 6365 30850 CIRCLE PLUMBING. INO REPAIR GAS LEAK ROOF 175.00 TOP UNIT 08/07 08I09I07 8368 31137 CONNEXUS ENERGY JUNE ELEC 1,278.21 08107 08I09J07 6367 40300 DELTA DENTAL SEPT DENTAL 717.20 08107 08J09I07 6388 <<l346 DEPUTY REGISTRAR .150 FORFEITURE 9S 35.00 CAVAUER TITLE TRANSFER 08107 08J09I07 6369 40700 DON'S CIRCLE SERVICE, INO JULY VEH OIL 767.15 CHGSJREPAlRS 08107 08I09I07 6370 ElO44O FOREMOST PROMOTIONS NATL NIGHT OUT 500.00 I SUPPUES I 08107 08/Q9m7 8371 60850 FRATTALLONES HARDWARE. INC. EV1DENCEBAGS 96.48 08107 08I09J07 6372 80800 KATHERINE HONKOMP SHOE REIMB 39.99 08107 08I09J07 8313 1000B0 JEFF'S BOBBY&STEVES AUTO \NOR FORFEITURE TOW 118.50 08107 08I09I07 6374 120331 LEAGUE OF MN CitiES INS TRUST WORK COMP ADJ 2,015.00 4J06.4J07 08107 08I09I07 6375 130205 MALLOY,MONTAGUE,KARNOWSKI, FINAL BIWNG 2006 3,875.00 AUDIT 08107 08I09I07 6376 130460 METRO SALES, INC COPIER MTC CONTRACT 968.20 7107-7108 08107 08I09I07 6317 130780 MN STATE BAR ASSOC CLE 2rl17 CRIMINAL JUSTICE 260.00 INST TRAINING 08107 08109/07 6378 140370 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS CELL PHONES 294.92 08101 08I09I07 6379 150100 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT. INe PRINTER RIBBON/DCR 200.82 DlSC/M1SC 08107 08I09I07 6380 160235 PETERSON COMPANIES, INC 2 MONTHS GROUND MTC 712.75 &AW 08107 08J09I07 6381 160250 PETTY CASH I BRITNI AUSTIN POSTAGE 23.49 08107 08I09I07 6362 160415 PITNEY BOWES METER RENTAL 119.79 9JD7-11J3Q107 REFILL CHGS 08107 08I09I07 6383 170180 QWEST PHONE 220.59 08107 08I09J07 8384 190375 SELECT ACCOUNT JULY SELECT ACeT 20.00 FEES 08107 08JD9J07 6385 190390 SHRED RIGHT SHREDDING 51.01 08107 D81D9JD7 6386 190910 STREICHER'8 AMMO 239.99 AMMO 360.29 AMMO 43.44 M == Manual Check. V == Void CheCk II- - --.------ - - ------ ----------------- -- ----- -------~- ~~ - ------ ~~---- Check RegIster POlICE <iL GL Po8IIng PerIod(s): 08107 - 08107 Check !$sue Date(s): 08I0112D07 - 08I09J2007 Page: 2 Aug OS, '2JJ07 04:52pm CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT Payee Invokle DescriptIon Inv Amount Per Da1B Check No Vendor No To18I6386 08I(J7 08IfJM07 08107 08I09I07 08107 08I09I07 08107 08I09lD7 08107 08I09J07 Tof8Is: 6387 6388 6389 6390 8391 190980 SUNSET CYCLE 200043 TELEClDE PRODUCTIONS, INC 210120 UNI-8ELECT USA 210127 UNICARE UFE & HEALTH INS. CO. 190910 STREICHER'S 2 BIKE HELMETS COMPUTER UTC TAHOE BATTERY SS'T UFEJDlSABlLITY AMMO 643.72 59.98 58.15 77.41 172.50 247.70 17,918.64 M IS Manual Cheok, V = Void Check /3 ~U_ _ ___________________________~___________________~___~_ ____uu - - ---- CENTERVILLE, CITY OF 1880 MAIN STREET CenterviI1e, MN 55038 AnN: MR. PAUL pALZER ANNUAL SERVICE AGREEMENT WATER STORAGE TANK I cLARIFIER CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM(S) www.corrpro.com www.corrprowaterworks.com - -ell" _JUl~_DWATERWORKS a COrrpTo Compsny .((.s~~~ POBox 721 Medina, OH 44256 Phone: 330-725-6681 Fax: 330-723-6065 CONTRACI' NO. 0027906 CUSTOMER 05110050 Corrpro engineering and maintenance services for effective and economical corrosion control in accordance with A WW A D 104 Appendix "C". Capacity/Structure 500,000 ELEVATED TANK Desienation/Location System No. 76450 Plan C Amount $ 495.00 All service plans include one site visit per contract term to include 1 thru 5. Additional plan services as noted below 1. Tank-to-Water potential profile within tank to monitor and verify effectiveness of system on submerged surface of tank. 2. Electrical Measurements to teSt anode and reference cells. 3. Inspect, teSt, and clean rectifier, controls, meters, contaCtS, wiring and connections. Replace fuses as required. 4. Adjust system for optimum corrosion control on submerged metal surface of tank. 5. Submit report with all data obtained, eva1uation of data, and recommendations for continued performance. Plan "A" Service: Includes one annua1 inspection as indicated including repair and/or replacement of anodes and rectifiers as required. Plan "B" Service: Includes one annua1 inspection as indicated including repair and/or replacement of anodes as required. Plan "C" Service: Includes only service 1isted in itemS 1 thru 5 above. Plan "AA" Service: Includes two inspections annually as indicated including spring installation and fall removal of anodes as well as repair and/or replacement of anodes and rectifiers as required Plan "BB" Service: Includes two inspections annually as indicated including spring installation and fall removal of anodes as well as repair and/or replacement as required Plan "CC" Service: Includes two inspections annually as indicated including spring installation and fall removal of anodes. Notes: For contract period 10/01107 through 9/30/08. Total lump sum of this agreement is $ 495.00 PaymentisduHt $estartOfthe contract periOd. Additional repairs or replacemellts ofsyatem components wouklbe subject to the subscriber's approval. ThIs agreement does not effect in any way the origina1 warrantY on the system(s) described above. . Corrpro agrees to maintain Genera1 LIability Insurance and Workmen's Compensation Insurance during the annua1 service period. The subscriber agrees to indemnify and hold hann1ess Corrpro for any damages arising out of the performance of this contraCt which is not covered by the foregoing insurance. Client and Corrpro agree that neither party sha1l be responsible to the other party for incidental. consequential. indirect, punitive. or exemplary damages with respect to any claims, disputeS. or other matters in question arising out of or re1ating to this Agreement or its termination, and Client and Corrpro hereby waive such damage. Corrpro's total 1iab1i\ity to Client sha1l not exceed the amount of compensation actUally paid for the services, products. or materials giving rise to the claim. Client and Corrpro waive al1 rights against each other and any of their subcontraCtors, agents. and employees for all loss or damage to property or its loss of use. Please include Job Site Contact Person: ~~RRPRO~W~LA-41V Phone number: SUBSCRIBER'S ACCEPl'ANCE . Ellen Hutcheson/Customer Service Signature: Printed namemtle: Date: 7/13/CY7 Date: Subscriber to mail one signed copy to CORRPRO WATERWORKS at the above address. l /1 ---------------- ------ ----------- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - ------ CORRPRO WATERWORKS - ADDITIONAL WATER TANK SERVICES ANNUAL 15 POINT TANK REVIEW 1. FOUNDATION: OBSERVE FOR SETILING, CRACKS, AND DETERIORATION. 2. EXTERIOR TANK COATING: OBSERVE FOR COATING FAILURE, CORROSION, AND LEAKS. 3. INTERIOR TANK COATING: OBSERVE AS ALLOWED FROM ACCESS HATCHES. 4. WATER LEVEL INDICATOR: CHECK OPERATIONAL CONDmON. 5. OVERFLOW PIPE: CHECK THE FLAP VALVE COVER AS ACCESSffiLE, OPERABLE, AND SEALED. 6. ACCESS LADDER: CHECK FOR LOOSE BOLTS AND RUNGS. 7. FALL PROTECTION DEVICES: CHECK OPERATION. 8. ROOF: CHECK FOR HOLES, RUST, AND PONDING WATER LOW SPOTS. 9. AIR VENTS: CHECK SCREENS, SEALED EDGES, AND SEAMS. 10. CATHODIC PROTECTION ANODES COVERS: CHECK FOR DETERIORATED GASKETS, AND IMPROPER SEAL. (FOR TANKS NOT PRESENTLY COVERED BY A SERVICE AGREEMENT). 11. ROOF HATCH: CHECK LOCKS, HINGES, AND GASKETS. 12. VISUAL WATER QUALITY: OBSERVE FOR FOREIGN MATTER AS DISCERNABLE FROM THE ROOF HATCH. 13. PHOTOGRAPH AREAS OF CONCERN. 14. WRITTEN RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION IF REQUIRED. 15. OBSERVE TANK SITE SECURITY. CHECK FENCES, GATES, AND ACCESS DOORS. ANNUAL COST $450.00 PER TANK ACCEPTED: YES_ NO " The service provided is an annual visual evaluation for the purpose of noting possible areas which may require further investigation or possible corrective action in accordance with A WW A recommended practices. It is limited to areas of the tank visible from access points such as ladders and catwalks. The work performed is not a structural evaluation nor does it take the place of a complete 3-5 year water tank inspection as recommended by A WW A standards. AVIATION LIGHT BULB REPLACEMENT (standard bulbs included) REPLACE ALL AVIATION LIGHT BULBS AT $115.00 PER TANK FOR THE FIRST TWO BULBS AND $25.00 EACH ADDITIONAL BULB. ACCEPTED: YES NO * Price based on Max. bulb size. 116 watt medium screw base Traffic Signal Bulb (116 A211 TS) INTERIOR LIGHT BULB REPLACEMENT (standard bulbs included) REPLACE ALL INTERIOR LIGHT BULBS AT $115.00 PER TANK FOR THE FIRST FNE BULBS AND $10.00 EACH ADDITIONAL BULB. ACCEPTED: YES NO * Price based on Max. bulb size, 150 watt medium screw base Rough Service Incandeseent Bulb (150 ADI RS) CENTERvn.LE, CITY OF CUSTOMER: CENTERvn.LE, MN SIGNATURE: CW: 05110050 TITLE: DATE: "All additional work is accepted as an addendum to the cathodic protection service agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions as indicated on the contract. Prices are contingent upon all work being performed in one site visit in conjunction with the acceptance ofthe cathodic protection system service agreement. Upon acceptance, iftbere are additional tanks in the water system that do not have cathodic protection systems, they may also be added to the service agreement for Tank Review and Bulb Replacement Service. /5' [[~g!!Ws~~ Preserve and Sustain Global Assets & Infrastructure August 1, 2007 Waterworks Division 1055 West Smith Road Medina, OH 44256 Tel: 3301725-6681 Fax: 3301723-6065 www.corrpro.com MR. PAUL PALZER CENTERVILLE, CITY OF 1880 MAIN STREET Centerville, MN 55038 Reference: Cathodic Protection Corrosion Control System #76450 Dear Customer: Enclosed is our maintenance agreement proposal which will provide for the inspection of the cathodic protection corrosion control equipment listed therein. Your early acceptance will allow for the proper scheduling by the Corrpro Waterworks operational facility in your area of this necessary service to evaluate the corrosion control system in the structure(s) covered by this agreement. Upon approval, please return a signed copy to the address indicated above. If you prefer, you may fax your response to 330/723-6065. You will also note that we have included a checklist of additional tank services we provide. While these services do not pertain directly to the operation of your corrosion control equipment, many of our customers have expressed a need for them. In the event you wish to subscribe to any of these services, simply complete the form accordingly and return one copy to us. Please bear in mind that the service charges indicated are in addition to the fee quoted for maintenance to your cathodic protection equipment. We ask that you please not hesitate to contact us in the event you wish to extend this agreement, in full year increments, beyond the expiration date indicated or if you have any questions whatsoever regarding the services we provide. The Contracts Center's Toll-Free number is 800/443-3516. Very truly yours, ~~ Enclosure Ellen Hutcheson Assistant Contracts Administrator Cleveland Atlanta Phoenix Hou9>n / /r; - - - --- - - -- ---- - - -- - ----- - - -- -- - ----------- --- - ---- ~', t f, ENGwBrs eOPv~ .. Bonestmo . Owner: City of Centerville, 1880 Majn Street Centerville, MN 55038-9794 Date: Auqust 16, 2007 For Period: 11/23/2006 to 8/16/2007 Request No: 5 Contractor: Burschville Construction, Inc., 11440 8th Street NE, P.O. Box 65, Hanover, MN 55341 CONTRACTOR'S REQUEST FOR PAYMENT BACKAGE ROAD AND 121ST AVENUE UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS BONESTROO FILE NO. 000616-05143-0 SUMMARY 1 Original Contract Amount 2 Change Order - Addition 3 Change Order - Deduction 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand 7 Amount Earned 8 less Retainage 5% 9 Subtotal 10 less Amount Paid Previously 11 Uquidated damages - 12 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. $ $ 40,039.16 0.00 5 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO i%;Z- Approved by Contractor: BURS HVlUE CONSTRUCTION, INC. Approved by Owner: CITY OF CENTERVlLLE $ 1,'118,251.90 1,158,291.06 1,058,916.82 0.00 1,058,916.82 52,945.84 1,005,970.98 807,559.00 0.00 198,411.98 Spedfled Contract Completion Date: Date: 61605143REQ5.x1s -------- ------~------ /1 ---- -~--~ I' t' Contract Unit Current Quantity Amount No. Item Unit Quantity Price Quantity to Date to Date PART 1 . SITE GRADING: 1 MOBIUZATlON IS 1 10000.00 1 $10,000.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROl IS 1 2250.00 1 $2,250.00 3 SILT FENCE, REGUlAR LF 3600 1.60 515 3174 $5,078.40 4 CLEAR AND GRUB IS 1 16000.00 1 $16,000.00 5 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) CY 66400 1.93 22453 57453 $110,884.29 6 GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CY 11 000 10.90 1769.5 8587.5 $93,603. 75 7 SAlVAGE AND RESPREAD TOPSOIl, 4" THICK IS 1 12950.00 1 $12,950.00 8 HAUL EXCESS TOPSOil OFFSITE CY 10000 1.10 10797 20797 $22,876.70 9 SHEEHY PROPERTY ACQUISITION DELAY - SEE SPECS LS 1 5000.00 1 $5,000.00 10 EROSION CONTROl BlANKETS, CATEGORY 4 SY 2200 1.70 695 1095 $1,861.50 11 TEMPORARY ROCK CHECK, ClASS I-N CY 75 95.00 16.27 23.27 $2,210.65 12 GEOTEXTIlE FABRIC FOR ROCK CHECK, TYPE N SY 110 10.00 97 107 $1,070.00 13 12" BIOROll IF 150 6.50 $0.00 14 24" STORM SEWER CULVERT IF 30 35.00 24 $840.00 TOTAL PART 1 - SITE GRADING: $284,625.29 PART 2 . SANITARY SEWER: 15 CONNEG TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER 8" PVC PIPE EA 1 2000.00 1 $2,000.00 16 8" PVC SANITARY SEWER, SDR 35 IF 980 26.00 974 $25,324.00 17 4' DIAMETER SANITARY MH, 8' DEEP EA 4 1850.00 4 $7,400.00 18 4' DIAMETER SANITARY MANHOlE OVERDEPTH IF 9 110.00 7.63 $839.30 19 INSULATION, 4" THICK SF 650 2.00 $0.00 20 CLOSED CIRCUIT TV INSPEGION IF 980 1.00 982 982 $982.00 21 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION, PER 6" INCREMENT IF 980 1.00 $0.00 TOTAL PART 2 - SANITARY'SEWER: $36,545.30 PART 3 - WATER MAIN: 22 REMOVE WATER MAIN IF 90 20.00 160 $3,200.00 23 SAlVAGE HYDRANT EA 1 1000.00 1 $1,000.00 24 JACK 12" WATER MAIN WITH CARRIER PIPE IF 55 390.00 57 $22,230.00 25 CONNEGTO EXISTING 8" WATER MAIN EA 1 1000.00 1 $1,000.00 26 12" X 12" WET TAP EA 1 3200.00 1 $3,200.00 27 12" PVC WATER MAIN IF 1450 31.00 1425 $44,175.00 28 8" PVC WATER MAIN IF 840 21.00 820 $17,220.00 29 6" PVCWATER MAIN IF 60 18.00 58.5 $1,053.00 30 12" GATE VAlVE AND BOX EA 1 1600.00 1 $1,600.00 31 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 2 950.00 2 $1,900.00 32 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 4 750.00 4 $3,000.00 33 HYDRANT WITH VALVE EA 4 2700.00 4 $10,800.00 34 12" FmlNG RESTRAINT EA 26 85.00 26 $2,210.00 35 8" FITTING RESTRAINT EA 15 48.00 15 $720.00 36 6" FITTING RESTRAINT EA 32 39.00 32 $1,248.00 37 12" 22.5 DEGREE BEND EA 4 380.00 4 $1,520.00 38 12" X 6" TEE EA 7 480.00 7 $3,360.00 39 8" 90 DEGREE BEND EA 2 235.00 2 $470.00 40 8" X 6" TEE EA 1 300.00 1 $300.00 41 8" X 8" TEE EA 1 375.00 1 $375.00 42 12" X 8" REDUCER EA 1 270.00 1 $270.00 43 8" PLUG EA 1 100.00 1 $100.00 44 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION, PER 6" INCREMENT IF 2000 1.00 $0.00 TOTAL PART 3 - WATER MAIN: $120,951.00 PART 4 - SERVICES: 45 6" PVC, SCH. 40 SERVICE PIPE IF 166 16.00 16 166 $2,656.00 46 6" PVC WATER MAIN IF 120 20.00 6 116 $2,320.00 47 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 4 750.00 4 $3,000.00 48 8" X 6" PVC WYE EA 4 100.00 4 $400.00 49 6" PLUG EA 4 80.00 4 $320.00 TOTAL PART 4 - SERVICES: $&696.00 / f 81605143REQ5.lC!s --~-- - -------~--- ------- ~----~--~--~-- - -----~ ---------------- ---------- ~ -~---- --------- -.- 0' , " Contract Unit Current Quantity Amount No. Item Unit Quantity Price Quantity to Date to Date PART 5 - STORM SEWER: 50 42" RCP STORM SEWER LF 445 107.00 440 $47,080.00 51 24" RCP STORM SEWER LF 230 37.00 226 $8,362.00 52 18" RCP STORM SEWER LF 520 31.00 494 $15,314.00 53 15" RCP STORM SEWER LF 1125 28.00 1097 $30,716.00 54 15" HDPE STORM SEWER LF 335 21.00 335 $7,035.00 55 42" FlARED END SECTION EA 2 3206.00 2 $6,412.00 56 24" FlARED END SECTION EA 1 1614.00 1 $1,614.00 57 18" FlARED END SECTION EA 6 942.00 6 $5,652.00 58 15" FlARED END SECTION EA 9 845.00 9 $7,605.00 59 4' DIA MANHOlE EA 1 1800.00 1 $1,800.00 60 4' DIAMffiR STORM CBMH EA 12 1850.00 11 $20,350.00 61 5' DIAMffiR STORM CBMH EA 1 2500.00 1 $2,500.00 62 2' X 3' CATCH BASIN EA 4 1100.00 4 $4,400.00 63 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE EA 4 1750.00 5 $8,750.00 64 ClASS III RANDOM RIPRAP CY 300 95.00 27.6 277.6 $26,372.00 65 6" PVC DRAIN TILE LF 600 12.00 600 $7,200.00 66 INSTAlL AND MAINTAIN SEDIMENTATION STRUCTURE EA 19 375.00 $0.00 67 REMOVE MISCELlANEOUS ITEMS AlONG PROPERTY LINE LS 1 800.00 $800.00 TOTAL PART 5 - STORM SEWER: $201,962.00 PART 6 - STREETS: 68 SAW BITUMINOUS LF 135 3.25 32 32 $104.00 69 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 550 2.00 262 312 $624.00 70 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUmR LF 225 2.25 115 165 $371.25 ~1 REM. & REPL CHAIN LINK FENCE LF 50 25.00 50 50 $1,250.00 72 SUBGRADE PREPARATION - STREET SY 10730 0.75 450 10450 $7,837.50 73 GEOTEXTlLE FABRIC, TYPE V SY 10730 1.38 450 10450 $14,421.00 74 AGGREGATE BASE, ClASS 5 TN 5275 11.40 100 5000 $57,000.00 75 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CY 5975 13.46 200 5700 $76,722.00 76 TYPE LV 3 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN 1250 50.00 256.95 1156.95 $57,847.50 77 TYPE LV 4 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN 1250 57.75 997.59 997.59 $57,610.82 78 BITUMINOUS MATERiAl FOR TACK COAT GAl 575 2.60 500 500 $1,300.00 79 SURMOUNTABLE CONCRffi CURB AND GUTTER LF 2900 8.90 724 2500 $22,250.00 80 B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUmR '; LF 1600 9.35 1684 $15,745.40 81 4" CONCRffi MEDIAN SY 30 38.00 22 22 $836.00 82 4" PERFORATED POlYETHYlENE PIPE LF 4500 2.75 4200 $11,550.00 83 BARRICADE EA 5 275.00 3 3 $825.00 84 ADJUST VAlVE BOX EA 2 250.00 2 2 $500.00 85 STREET SWEEPER WITH OPERATOR HR 20 110.00 12 12 $1,320.00 86 4 MIL POlY SY 450 3.00 $0.00 87 EROSION CONTROl BlANKETS, CATEGORY 3 SY 500 1.60 300 500 $800.00 88 MNDOT SEED MIX 28B AC 5 775.00 3.61 4 $3,100.00 89 BWSR SEED MIXTURE W2 AC 4.5 1400.00 0.3 4.3 $6,020.00 90 BWSR SEED MIXTURE U6 AC 2 1000.00 0.7 1.7 o $1,700.00 91 SODDING, lAWN TYPE SY 1150 3.50 260 260 $910.00 92 SIGN PANELS, TYPE C, HIGH INTENSITY SF 21 29.00 22.5 22.5 $65~.50 93 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE, YELLOW EPOXY LF 900 0.95 413 413 -$m;-35 94 4" SOLID LINE, YELLOW EPOXY LF 2000 0.50 2097 2097 $1,048.50 95 4" BROKEN LINE, YELLOW EPOXY LF 440 0.50 410 410 $205.00 96 4" SOLID LINE, WHITE EPOXY LF 250 0.50 250 250 $125.00 97 12" SOLID STOP LINE (BAR), WHITE EPOXY LF 35 8.50 26.5 26.5 $215.25 98 PAVEMENT MESSAGE, LEFT TURN ARROW - EPOXY EA 5 125.00 5 5 $625.00 99 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA 2 1000.00 1 1 $1,000.00 TOTAL PART 6 - STREETS: $344,918.07 61605143REQ5.>c1s /1 ----- -- -------~ -----------~ ---------- "" f . Contract Unit Current Quantity Amount No. Item Unit Quantity Price Quantity to Date to Date PART 7 - CSAH 54 RIGHTTURN lANE: 100 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 1000.00 1 $1,000.00 101 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) CY 230 15.00 230 $3,450.00 102 SAWING BITUMINOUS LF 500 2.75 $0.00 103 SUBGRADE PREPARATION SY 750 0.75 750 $562.50 104 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN 270 11.50 200 $2,300.00 105 TYPE LV 3 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN 95 58.00 90 $5,220.00 106 TYPE MV3 NON-WEAR COURSE (C) TN 65 66.00 60 $3,960.00 107 TYPE MV3 WEAR COURSE (C) TN 65 66.00 60 $3,960.00 108 BiTUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 80 2.60 50 50 $130.00 109 4" SOLID LINE, WHITEEPOXY LF 720 0.50 695 695 $347.50 110 PAVEMENT MESSAGE, RIGHTTURN ARROW - EPOXY EA 1 125.00 2 2 $250.00 111 SEEDING AC 0.2 775.00 $0.00 TOTAL PART 7 - CSAH 54 RIGHT TURN LANE: $21,180.00 CHANGE ORDER NO.1 1 CREW TIME HR 3.5 725.00 3.5 $2,537.50 2 8" DIP PLUG EA 1 73.49 1 $73.49 3 CREW TIME HR 7 725.00 7 $5,075.00 4 8" DIP 45 DEGREE BEND EA 4 279.88 4 $1,119.52 5 8" PVC, C900 WATERMAIN LF 10 14.72 10 $147.20 6 1.5" ROCK STABILIZATION TN 15 19.73 15 $295.95 7 CREW TIME HR 0.5 725.00 0.5 $362.50 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.1: $9,611.16 CHANGE ORDER NO.2 1 8" DIP WATER MAIN, CLASS 52 LF 35 29.00 35 $1,015.00 2 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 1 950.00 1 $950.00 3 CONNECTTO EXISTING 8" WATER MAIN EA 1 1000.00 1 $1,000.00 4 8" 90 DEGREE BEND EA 1 235.00 1 $235.00 5 8" PLUG EA 1 100.00 1 $100.00 6 8" FITTING RESTRAINT EA 4 48.00 4 $192.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.2: $3,492.00 C,HANGE ORDER NO.4 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 3000.00 1 1 $3,000.00 2 21. RCP STORM SEWER LF 432 35.50 432 432 $15,336.00 3 21" RCP FLARED END SECTION EA 1 1500.00 1 1 $1,500.00 4 SALVAGE AND REINSTAll 6" PVC DRAlNTllE LF 200 18.00 200 200 $3,600.00 5 RIP RAP, CLASS III CY 15 100.00 15 15 $1,500.00 6 RESTORE DRAINAGE SWAlE LS 1 2000.00 1 1 $2,000.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.4: $26,936.00 TOTAL PART 1 . SITE GRADING: TOTAL PART 2 - SANITARY SEWER: TOTAL PART 3 - WATER MAIN: TOTAL PART 4 - SERVICES: TOTAL PART 5 - STORM SEWER: TOTAL PART 6 - STREETS: TOTAL PART 7 - CSAH 54 RIGHT TURN lANE: TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.1: TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.2: TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.4: $284,625.29 $36,545.30 $120,951.00 $8,696.00 $201,962.00 $344,918.07 $21,180.00 $9,611.16 $3,492.00 $26,936.00 TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE $1,058,916.82 61605143REQ5.x1s ~ - - - --------- ------'---------- ------'-~~ ---- ------------- PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER CITY OF CENTERVILLE BONESTROO FILE No. 000616-05143-0 CONTRACTOR BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION, INC. CHANGE ORDERS N D D Am o. ate esalptlon ount 1 7/28/2006 This Change Order provides for additional work on this project. See $9,611.16 Change Order. 2 8/4/2006 This Change Order provides for a watermain extension requested by the $3,492.00 City of Lino Lakes. See Change Order. 3 10/6/2006 This Change Order provides for adjustments to the completion dates for this project. This Change Order does not provide for any additional 4 8/16/2007 This Change Order provides for additional storm sewer on this project $26,936.00 at the request of Anoka County. See Change Order. Total Change Orders $40,039.16 PAYMENT SUMMARY No. From To Payment Retainage Com pi eted 1 06/01/2006 07118/06 104,734.60 5,512.35 110,246.95 2 07/19/2006 09/01/06 75,984.00 9,511.51 190,230.11 3 09/02/2006 10/17/06 353,140.84 28,097.87 561,957.31 4 10/18/2006 11/22/06 273,699.56 42,503.11 850,062.11 5 11/23/2006 08/16/07 198,411.98 52,945.84 1,058,916.82 Material on Hand Total Payment to Date $1,005,970.98 Original Contract $1,118,251.90 Retainaqe Pay No. 5 52,945.84 Change Orders $40,039.16 Total Amount Earned 1 $1,058,916.82 Revised Contract $1,158,291.06 61605143REQ5.xJs A -------------~------ . . Bonestroo Owner: Ci of Centerville, 1880 Main St., Centerville, MN 55038 Date Au US! 16,2007 Contractor: Burschville Construction, Inc., 11440 8th St. NE, P. O. Box 65, Hanover, MN 55341 Bond No: 929 Bond Com an: Western Sure Co., P. O. Box 1068, Houston, TX 77251 3979961 CHANGE ORDER NO.4' A."':\ BACKAGE ROAD AND 21ST AVENUE UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS. .' '.~ CUT '.. . BONESTROO FILE NO. 000616-05143-0 -iC.):\......, ft.11~~'" , Description of Work C ~~, ' This Change Order provides for additional storm sewer on this project at the request of An~ County. Contract Unit Total No. Item Unit Quantity Price Amount CHANGE ORDER NO.4 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 2 21" RCP STORM SEWER LF 432 $35.50 $15,336.00 3 21" RCP FLARED END SECTION EA 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 4 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL 6" PVC DRAINTILE LF 200 $18.00 $3,600.00 5 RIP RAP, CLASS III. CY 15 $100.00 $1,500.00 6 RESTORE DRAINAGE SWALE LS 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.4: $26;936~OO 6J60514~C'H04,xls ~ Original Contract Amount Previous Change Orders This Change Order Revised Contract Amount (including this change order) CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES Original Contract Times: Substantial Completion (days or date): Ready for final Payment (days or date): Increase of this Change Order: Substantial Completion (days or date): Ready for.fi~al Payment (days or date): Contract Time with all approved Change Orders: Substantial Completion (days or date): Ready for final Payment (days or date): Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO /ty Approved by Contractor: BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION, INC. ~ 1~'..I~. 8,/(., - 01 Date,',::, cc: Owner Contractor Bonding Company Bonestroo & Assoc. 61605 [~3C1104 xis Date: $1,118,251.90 $13,103.16 $26,936.00 $1,158,291.06 Approved by Owner: CITY OF CENTERVILLE Date ----.----'.- ------------- ------- ;3, 2335 Hlghwily 36W St. Pal.d. MN ~')111 Tel651 636 iI600 Fax 6SHB6-lJl1 ~t'ooc.om August 15, 2001 Teresa Bender City of CenteJVille 1880 Main Street CentelVille, MN 55038 Re: 2009 Street and Utility Improvements - Project Update City of Centerville Bonestroo File No.: 000616-07158-0 .. Bonestroo Dear Teresa: As we move fClward with the Feasibility Study for the 2009 Street and Utility Improvements Project we have a few items to bring before the Council for Q&USSion. They include: . Reviewing quotes and awarding contract to perform soU borings throughout the project. . Setting a date for the project Open House. . Reviewing the proposed abandonment of LS '3. . Reviewing remaining sidewalk improvements Supporting documents are attached for inclusion in the COlIlCiI packets as you see fit. The following is an updated schedule for the project through the next couple of months: Staff Review of Feasibility Report Present Draft Feasibirrty Report to Council Public Open House Accept Final Version of FeasibUity Report Improvement Hearing Preliminary Survey Plans and Specs August 27-31 September 12 September 18 or 19 September 26 October October~November November - February Please call with any questions. Sincerely, ~./ ~ ''-rV( y Mark Statz, PE City Engineer 651-604-4709 attachments: SUpporting Documents copy: Paul Palzer - Pub6c Works Director DaUas Larson - Administrator St Paul ')1.t1outl RocI1t'srer Milwaukee Cbicc<<JlI OPERATIOJI AND III.AIII'IIIIMC COSTS Table XX summarizes the annual1zed maintenante costs ~ed with operating lS #3. $1,000 $7,500 $30,000 $2,600 $1,200 $180 $500 $1,000 $750 $1,000 $7.230 Table XX summarizes the annualized maintenance costs associated with an additional 1700 LF of gravity sewer. ,18UI. ... .ITI.AnD AM..AUZI. O'EIATIOM AMD MA..'.MAIICI COlli FDI nil Lf OF .IAv.n "W.8 5425 $1275 RECOrIMEfIDED SOLUTIOI From above. the total cost to construd the gravity sewer in Option 1 is S 1 09.000. The net cost savings in maintenance for Option 1 is $6.550 ($7,230-$680). This gives us a payback period of roughly 16.6 years. From above, the total cost to construct the gravity sewer in Option 2 is S 142,000. The net cost savings in maintenance for Option 2 Is $1,230. This gives us a payback period of roughly 19.6 years. The payback period is smaR enough to justify the improvements. With the additional reliabirlty of the system, which is difficult to quantify, gained through the improvements, we would recommend installing the new gravity sewer to eliminate lS #3. Option 1 appears to be a better value in terms of how quickly the improvement will pay for itself. However, if there are significant problems identified with the sewer in Center Street which need repair, that could change the balance. It is also unknown at this time. whether the south route can be constructEd completely within existing drainage and utility easements. If additional easements were needed. this would also require a reexamination of the numbers. A spedflc route option can be chosen as part of the final design as more detailed Information is gathered to evaluate eadl option. L ;5 Lift Station #3 It has been proposed that CenterviUe's lift station number three (LS #3) be etiminated and a new ~ sanitary fine be run from the lift station to Hft station number four. A survey loop was nm between the two lift stations, confirming this is physically possible. DISI1NG (ONDITIONS Currently, LS '3 is operated and malntafned by CenterVille's publIc works staff. The 6ft station was installed In 1981 and the pumps were replaced on the station in 1997 indicating a 10 year life span fOl these pumps. This would lead us to the assumption that the existing pumps are likely nearing the. end of theif useful life. The staff Is spending approximately one hour of time per weeIc at the lift station for maintenance needs. PROPOSED IMPIIOVEIIBIfS flow enterfng LS '3 would be Ie routed in one of two directions. In Option 1, the outgoing pipe woukf run south along the existing storm pond and then east along the south side of the development in the City's existing uttlity easement A1tematively, the sewer could be relayed from LS #3 to the east. down Center Street This would require re- hooking services along the way but may be sfrghtly shorter and would replace the existing sewer which is about 20 years old. The estimated project cost of each at these options is presented In Table XX. The proposed routes are shown on Figure xx. 1.511 $59,500 $20 000 $10,000 $0 $15.000 $4,500 $109,000 Pi . MHs, etc. (1600 If <<D35flF) Jackln (under CSAH 54 Connect 10 LS Reconnect ServIces RestotatIon (turf) Restoration (road Total $56 000 $20,000 $10,000 $5,000 $1,000 $50 000 $142.000 $ BRAUN INTERTEC COST ESTIMATE SP..o7..o3738 2001 Street & UtIlity Improv. Pro). Service Desc: Geotechnical Evaluation Bonestroo, Inc. Emily Maloney 2335 Highway 38 West SaInt Paul, MN 55113 Work LocatIon: City of Centervllle CentervHle, MN EstImator: Kurpfus, Joel C DescrIptIon: Quantity: Units: Unit Price: ExtensIon: staking and UtIlity Clearance SIte layout and utlIity clearance Trip charge 4.00 Hours n.oo 1.00 Each 37.00 Phase Total: DrBllng Services DriHing Services 1.00 Each 6,181.00 Phase Total: SolI Observations & Testing Moisture content (Astm 0 2216) Atterberg Umlts: LL and PL (ASTM D 4318) No. 200 only (ASTM C 117 or 01140) 30.00 Tests 2.00 Tests 10.00 Tests Phase Total: Engineering Consulting Servk:e8 Project Engineer Senior engineer Project AssIstant CADDlGraphlcs Operator 14.00 Hours 2.00 Hours 6.00 Hours 2.00 Hours Phase Total: 10.00 75.00 50.00 122.00 140.00 63.00 79.00 SUMMARY Staking and utility Clearance Drilling Services SolI Observations & TeeUng Engineering Consulting Services 345.00 8,181.00 950.00 2,524.00 510,000.00 Total: Page 1 of 1 308.00 37.00 $345.00 6,181.00 $8,181.00 300.00 150.00 500.00 $850.., ';.. 1,708.00 280.00 378.00 158.00 52,524.00 Z1 L S """, I ~8 ! \IlJIUl'f . " , A I ...,... So\1t'4 ( ~ "O~TL OPrlC.t-' 'J + ~o'ttt-( ~~TL (bPrIQ"'\ 2.) 1-1' A.JG-09-2l1l07 09: ~ .. Ut1..... ... ~r1IItTW.~ P.12I1/05 .... tWin ~IIY T..UI1l COIpOndIon Company : 601J'FtS'IUo TeIef8X No. ~ {"I -6 '5 it ... fJ t f AtIn. = /ih,""i .""#A~ c.o. : ~, Number d pages : From : ~ 72/ts'11f1r;diJ Dele PJ#f ..-h61 Yaur ref.JNo. Our "".ING. SubJeGt : e., "'I liP ~1'f/;1.VIUJ'" If you haVe prabtems reaWIng this m I B ge. pIa1e CDI'tISot us .. MdiBdBI T""" -Non DIll. "'t.a T...... ,... ~'f}a oQIIIDualClft ........ 882 o...t,.J8Il Avenue 81. Paul, MN 55114 USA T.......: (851) 846-3801 T8I8fex : (851) 859-7348 W8bde : www.8lDlfclc:l.oam TELEFAX Msg. No.: 114 pos,n., /t17JttIMJ STORM- MII8rI8I8'IiI:hnDIDIW stork TwIn CIly T8IIIIng ~Uon ........A.II->-. ...... lIIiIniar~lICII__ .. c...d A1InuI....... IAN 1111+1718 'N :(II1114N111'1 ~ :(111118-7233 PIll :~~~~ :(111)D8S EoftlIIl. , WeIIde;~ - ,.1r;1f 'lids TI!I.BIAX cantaIII8 ........... fram ItDIk ..... .., T...... ~ ....... Is ~........ .....~ Is ..... ded ..., far Use use of ...lIIdIvIduII...... on .... GIIMI'.... IfJOll....tllelldltrllfl d ....... ,.... ......, ....... IIIIt ., ..'r....... III. ... .. tIIdng at ..., KtIorI .. .... on the (001.... vi.... .....AXI!D "'w..__ Is LIIIrIdIJ praia..,," 81llIII1'*t air 'RIllIn8 c.-...aon .. en 0IIlIIIIIInII unit fIf BtII1t IIaIIIdM TeatlnDIDtW"V~ AmIiIBIdIIm. lIII NIl\tIIdImlII, ...... II BI'II!IIIII8rGf .. 8tIIk IJUIIIL 29 Fl.JG-09-2007 09: J5 P.e21'85 STCAW TWin CIty Testing Corporation 682 CromweQ Avenue. St. Paul. MN 55114-1776 (651) 845-3801. Fax (861) 869-7348 STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT TO ENGAGE THE SERVICES OF STORK TWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION THIS AGREEMENT, entered Into on the 13th C1ayof August . 2007. by, EmQv Malonev 91 8qJl~ (-c&8nt"), and Stork Twin City Testing CorporatIOn ("Twin em, TeatIftg"), located at 682 Cromwell Avenue, at. Paul, MInnesota 55114. A. The "Pro,Jer:r Is described .: Geotechnical ExploratIon - Soil BorIngs CIty of CentervlIIe 2009 Street and Utilly Improvement ProjeCt. Centervllle, Minnesota B. Twin CRy Testing wtU perform profe8sIonaI services for Client 8$ follows; -G8otechn1c8l SerYIces 0nIy- -Layout/rmlrk borings at locations designated on eite plant ptOVided by Bonestroo. -NoUfy Gopher state 0ne-CaII to set up utility meet and locate buried utiUtIes. -Put down 64 flight auger borings to d depths of 5'. Drill at tocatiOnS which sHow for traffic control to be limited to warning signs and cones. BackflH and patch bOre holes. Measure and reconS road section depths. -SUbmit report including boring logs, boring location plan sheets, a written ~ of subsUtfaoe cond~ and 8 recommended street pavement section. C. Client wi. compensate Twin City Testing for services as follows: Layout. uttIlty \ocBteS and soU borings: Project Management: coordination, soil sample nMew, boring loge and report Lump sum $5.000.00 lumD SUm SSOO.OO TOTAL. $1.800.00 this price Is valid for sixty days fium date above. invoices are due upon receipt. A late payment FINANCE CHARGE will be charged at the periodic rate of 1.5% per month (or the maximum allowed by law) on any baIence remaining unpaid 30 days after the date at the invoiCe. CJIent COntaCt emily L Maloney Bonestroo Phone: 651-967-4620 Fax: 651-838-1311 ThIs ~.. be gD1I8Il1lIIl trl'M""ett b!/ till priIIBl.....1IIld m:n:I\tIan9 rI_1II1II ,......... of ~ C8fVICe8 ~ SUllIe,...,. CilVT~ Ina. B NarIh CaIIIIna BusIJIlIlIS...._.dIwrrcr>d.d. 0lIIIl1I2D0'I.1n lID _8hBII e.dI1WIn CltyTIIIllIag.Ina. tlBllBIlI8 for IfIfty ~... fIt.....1aIIS Gl' 8IIY diIIIl8lIB& IIIIa9D Il8Ill1Bl ottIWwadL """"18 _ \\INn 3D .,. rlbWaIaB. ~ FI.IlH!B-2e07 09: 35 P.e3/1i!15 CIty 2009 StnrIet & utBIty ImproVement pmJect Page 2 at 2 CIty of Centervllle Augu8t 13. 2007 The only applicable term. and conditions an this quote are the TCT GENEfW. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE AND PeRFORMANCE OF TESTING SERVICES 8Y STORK TWIN CI1Y TESTING. tNC., a North CaroHn8 bUsiness corporation ('leT') d.d. 0510112001. A copy of 1hese terms and conditions will be sent to you free Of charge upon request. UOMTMN~ ~ . Name: L8onan:I ~n. P.E. TItle: 8enior Geotechnical Enaineer iTESnNG CORPORAnON By: Name: Title: By signing this Agreement, Client assents to the tenns and conditions set forth above and attached. CLIENT: By: Name: TItle: 'I'h1a fIIII8IIIIIflll1l8llll8 gowmecI tllDtU.r~.,\he gentl8IlII'I'II8l1ld OOfIlIlIIOnIClI............,..,.Gf fIS\lIlI8ClrlIlceI br""'" CIlVT....... a I'btI CeroIIna.... _~ rTcr)d.d. 0llID11l1llD1. In ~... shllIIlDk TwIa CIlyT..... 1m. be llablarar....--..-w. &pBGIIlllrlndlJel;llClG8 Gl'''' dluIIlIglIlI abIIlIB .._ d.. UIlIIk. PayaIIIIlIsI duIl1llll.llln 3D dl,sf:41JM1/De. 3/ P.~ Fl.JG-09-2e0'7 09: 36 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDmoNS OF SALE AND PERFORMANCE OF TESTING SERVICES BY STORK 1WIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION, . North C8rDBna bu8Iness corporatlon f'TCT"). elated 0110112001 1. _1oaIkm: ~fIIfoA at Cad1III. Th8B8 General T_ and CandItIons or Sale... PeIfo.n_1C8 t1fTeslIng IClr\rIc8s (the "Terms end ~, IIhBIIlIf'pIy to 11II81$) In AJIpIICt of the puratNIse end BIlle of IBstII1g and ottI8r senk:8S (the "W0Tk") pUl8U8l1t 10 anv canlnH:l (II "CotIhd") 10 whIctt Ihe8e Tentl$ and CoI'UIhIDn$ l\IT8 made eppIklabIe. The wbr.d8sIo.. by a pany rcwtomar". of any SIIlftIlIe to lCT Jot lt$lInIJ or Blmllatr seMCQSI shaH. UJlIII'18CCl!lPt8llCe of such IlIIII1p1e by TCT b IUCh servIceI. con&tItute an ."... Contreoc to whId'Ilhese Terms n ConcfItigqs 1iIJlPlY. AD onhn for WGl'k are subjecl to TeT's apprDYIIl 8ft(1 aocep1anCG. 2. 1IoIP...... 1II'ICIw.hvr; other TIIIIM. No JlI'OVhiIgn In thUIe terms and ConcIItions may w varIIIcI or __ 8lIlIPl by a WJftIng ~ d8IH:rIbfrlg such \IIIIIano8 ar WBIver Ifgnn by an a8faer of TCI'. TC'1'"e 8CICllIPI8i- CII' admowI8cfgemenl twen If In wrtIIng and IlIgned by TOT. Qf CUStom8t'; purc:haae on:Ier ar anv oUler cIoclum&1t pAItaMIng to lhe Wolle 8haII nol,. deemed 8I'l ~N'tr of IIr1Y provI8Ian of Cu&Ion1enJ pun;lt1aIe ord8I' ar any oII1er document Ih8t c:onIIata with or adds to these terms and c:andIIIons, IIbBent II IIep8J'lIte Bgr88Mt/rlt In wftIng l1lgmId by TCT ~y ackrtowledglng at'ld agreaIng Ia tuOtl pIll'Iislon8. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED mAT IN THE EVENT 1'MMS AND CONPITIONI SET FORTH tN Nrf ORDBR PORM, PURCHASe REQUEST OR CONfIRMATION PROVIDED BYCU8T011ER AJn) TO OM COHFUCT WITtI 'nIESE TERII8 ANO CONDITION8. 11f!SE: 11!RM8 AND CONDI11ON8 SHALL PREVAIL AND GOVERN. TCT'S ACCJ!IrTANCE OF A CONTRACT TO PERFORM WORK IS EXPR88SL y t:ONDITIONAL ON CUSTOMER'S AGREEMeNT AND ASSENT TO THESE TERMS AND CONDmONS. 3. Prien b the Work; PlIl/IIlenl I'rIllQ quotod by TeT lor the Work we so!oly far lt1e perfotlnBn(:(l of tho Wark /lod do "",1 Include freight, Irisur3nce.lnspeaIIon or packaging charges, wareIuluSIng QI' &tonago OOSls. or any llalell, use. excite, CIJtltoma iMtea. D1'other taJl8& or fees ~ Unless TCT ~y agrees In wrI\1ng to PB!t such Costs, a118ud'1 Cosls ore 10 be PlIId by CUslottler and any Ca$ts paIcI by Tc:T shall promptly " relmb\l1Jed by CUsIomer. A mJnImum c:hsrp of $3&.00 appJIesl 10 eadt IIIImple IUbmIttrad UI'lIess I blanket purd1ase order epecIf~ different ptlcIng has bHrt 8UbmttIIId amlllOC8Pted. Written and oral quutBtJons 8ft!I tIUbjec:t to wIlhdlawal by TC't by notice at any time, and, In any ewnt. ehall be vraIId onIv for thirty (30) days from the dolts theRlol. Pa)mlent Is due In cash 88 apeclltled In TCl"s ~, pl'Opcl8DI err order aonfIrmatIon n, unl88a o1I1lBW/Se uprasaIy agrBlId to In WIftIng by TI:t', payment I, due In U.S. donar. only. If nQt specIfle(Ilhendn. paym8tlt 18 due In oa&h upon COIl\PIetiCIn of the wotk; provided. howawr. that If !he ConlraOl.InvoIve8 a series of tt8tB or Olher ewnts of pmtiBI perfonnam:e. TeT may invoice, and CUstDrrI<< BhaIl pay for, eaoh such tesI. or part on a pro rata bull. If P8/'fIlrmanw Is deIayeO by euatarn8l' or other C8use9 brqond rCT's rea&DIIIIbIe ocmtroI. TeT rnB)' submit lnwlaes. end payIl'IfmlahaIJ become due. ae If &he WDJk had been completed lilt acheduIed. Ifsuc:h delay 18 caused by CUstomIill'. CUItomor nU addIllonaIIy pay ai r&UOI'\IbIe WIIJ"Ohau8lrIfJ end other expensaa .s CasI8 01 TC'r incident to lM:h delay In shipment. The net amount for servIGe8 pefformed pwsuant to lhe8e Terms and Condft\on$ &haD be due In fuU, \1\41hout cIl&cauttf, wIlhIn lhIrty (30) daya of InllOlce. unless oUleIwIse stated. If pIiYIlleIlIln run .. ngt made when due.1ntereat 8h8lI8GOlU& on the unpaid balance at the 1as\l(!J' of (I) ths rate gf 'tlS% per monIh (18% per annum) or (Ill the m8lllf'rll.llll ruto psnnlUed under RpPIIoabIe law. customer FA.~IIlU'NTOIlkIllaltol("-atIamIL88IlDI :rn.MoIIlomI..... .... to pay rea&on8bIe 1IIIDrney&' ,... iJ1c:un'ft by TeT In f/Iv decIIon of ... due IrJvDlces and iIccounI bafant.es II Tel at any lime determines In 118 &Ole judgmenl that thllf'8 arD .-..&onabIa grounds ror lnsecurfty wIIh respect to CU8talll8t's paymant for !he Wvrk at *"'1 other ~ or Cuslomfll set forlh In the Contmcl or In lheH TetM8 and O:uldlllons. TeT may requlte adequalS nsural'A of due ~ or otf1IJr performsnce. auch 8fI payment In cash or sa~ sec;urity, and until TeT receives SUdl BSSU1'aI\C8, TCT may suspencl8rtY perfarnumce for VIIhIch " t18& not a1r88d)' I'8CeIved payment. 4. CompIetIOJI of Work; LImIted W.....ltJ. TCT W8f'tl8rIt5l1mi It will COIIJpIeIB Jhe Work In a ~yand ~e M8tIrMJr CClII8IsIanI wIIh Indu8IIl tIiIIndards. TCT will __ commercially l1IIIIIOf\8bIe 8fforbI to comp1et8 the Wclflc SJld provide. repclft Dl8reon by any dale reB80lRfbly ~ In writlng by Cuatamer. but &hall nat be IIabIs for 8f'\J ~ In UHI peJfarmance of pI'lIjeGte or In the d8Ihery 01' shipment of goodi. or for 8ft)' cIamages sutrea'f1d by the oIIent by rea.n Of such delay. TCT'. J)8tformara of 8hy 800 811 Work 19 ~ IlJ TCT,* amvnt fadIty KMdules, goverrunemtat PlforiIl8s. anrl u1t1ll1 gowmment reguJaUOl1s. purdIa&a OI'dBl'S, cIlrectToos. ana ,"'cIIon8 that may be In eIIec1 from time to lline. EXCEPT AS EXPUCITLY SET FOImf IN TtiI8 PARAGRAPH 4. TCT MAKES NO OTHER WARRANlY. WHETHER EXPRESS.IMPL.II:D OR STAl\ITORY, AND ALL SUCH WARRANTIES ARE HEREJIY E!XPRE:SSL Y ElCCLUDED TCT'q -"1111)' sNIU IInlllpply to ;,t11Y pol'IIon of t/lO \"Vorl< porformed bye pQtty othertharl TCT GXCePtto ItIlI RXlenl UlldlllllY 8UC/'! IhIrrI party I\as wan1ltlted such j.ItlI'foITn"l"v;V tn Tel WIll'llI' IilIIlIe (Q TCT llI'Jdter $lith WIIrr/lflly. No employee. agent or other person 18 BUIharIZecI to ~ ilrly warrantles on b&haIt of TOT In addltlon In or dlffereml from lhOBll hnn given. Ot to assume for TeT any other IIebUIty fn eonnecdon wfth tho Walk exceplln a wrIllng whICh III HIgned by an authorized ofIIe8r of TOT. which 8lIpRlSSly gives such warranU8IIl or ilSBUII'IClIIl 8Uch llablIIly, and ftf1IoI1ls made part or the CanlIttct ~~ to par"tlfllPh8 1 and 2 abcMl. 50 CU8lIH1HIr'e Property. Whenever TCT 1$ provided In wrIIIng cIetaIl8d /r1strUc1Ion8 B8 to lhe treatment and handJlnv of CUstomer's prvperty. TCT wIIIl>>I8rd8e corrnnerlllldly reasonable efl'cn1e Iv comply with such 11"ldrUclIonS. Type of malerllll. toIer8nce8 and apedftcatlans for ptOOe8S/ng eh8II be cIoclared In writing by CUstomer Prior to TCT. commendng any WoIt or sh811 be deemed mt to Nile befll'l known by iCT. 'restlng 8ElIVl(;ea lIUPJIlled by TCT are fjJ8NIl8II~ aon8IdcIred CD be dfJ8ll\lcUVe. Under 8peCIaI conditions, aame te&1Ing may bo jHIfonned w1thqut lfe8IrarIng sample&. HoM'IB'. by BUbmfUlng CGIIlf)IHl8RI& or aampIes to fer. Cuslarner expreasIy agrees th$I an matGldaJ 8Ubmftted ~ be de81rDyed . rcl' win not be responsIbIe for en)' oostB or IoIllle8 resullIrtg ,",m destrucIIon fIf' CU8tlmer'a property 8Ubmltled to Tef un/es.'\ both 110 wrItlen Cont1scl and CUstomer's property In deaJ1y msrklld "Do No! ~.. If the CGn1facl rmd CUstomer's properly era not 80 marked. TCT shaU Mva ItO ulIbIIIty for damage to Cuatof".S pro.. If the ConIract and CUstomer's PI'llp8l'ly" 80 ml!rked, TCT'$1iabIIIly for damage to Customer'>> property I$IImfted to \hi} lesser or u) Ih8 value nf Cualomw's properly or (II) the (lOSt ot Iho WoIk perrormed on the damflgEld properlv 1n1l'81.1Ml1o the Contract lJrtd9t IIlJ CDl'llfIIlons will Tel be r8lllJX1l1Slble rm i1ny 3~ -- -- ~-~-------------- -------- --- -- -~-- -~ -~------- ---- FUG-09-2e0'7 09: 36 ..ddIlIoI1II COllI or damag8&.1ncIudInO ~ damsges and fndInIal c:aeI8 or....... resuItIn8 frOift cIeIlrvGCIGn of QI&IOM8r'B praplIIty. By 8UbmItIIng JII'OJBlY to TCT. CU8tQtIIer ...___ and .....10 .....1fnftaIIun& MdIldlnDwlBdIJll8 and ...... that TOT ... .. pItce '" the pelfOtNll106 of Work on the tllIsIIn:e and ............MIti of auc:h 1ImIt8tIons. e. ShlppIftg. TCT.m.t Cus1otna"e rt/f8OI18bI8l'8qU8S1 sela. .. tihIppIng agent for the retwn of CasIotaet'A prop8Ity lifter perfOl'mlng .... WCIIk. AI CUskJmer"s agent. TCT will c:mlItad for QOJnmon carrier deIIv8ry as teqUMl8d In writing by CUlItomer. Under no c:omltlon8 will TCT I18YtI any liability far any Item so IlhlpPed. 11I8UI'8ftCI!I. be fIUl'Chaeed (gr GOlIlmon canIer 8hlpptng only wh&n l1KfUlilIltld In YttItIng by CUstomer and wtlen det;;I8r8d value Ia IndIcaI8d. and !he f~ of TCT to purchlJse In8ur8nOe lIhaII not r88UIt In any IJabIIlty on Ihe part of TCT. CuslDm8l'may be billed dIrecIly by C(ImfII'" oenfenl for fnIIght IIIld c..tDm_8hBII maIcB 811 cI8Im8 for pRIp8Ily daIIl8ged In ItanIlIt dInldIy BRd saIIIy against such rreI;I'd ClIrrIer&. 7. T1tIe; 8ecurilJ......... nu. ~ ~8 proper1y and 1111 ri$Ic of loa or damage tv 8UClh proptII1r stlIII1 remain ., customer lit B1111me&. CUstomer hereby granta IrI TCT . &aIrity Int8reIIt In all of CusIDmer's properly praIIIded to TCT \tIr tea8ft9 or other seMC98 under It\e Conlfad Ia ~ the PlJYIIIenl of !he ~ prtcoe tor Ole Wg~ ~ oU1er tees or cI10rgas dUe TCT hereunder. CUstomer WlI not be entitled to Ih& lOt\I"' of lIS property. end 9ftmr such rcIUm shall not ba enIIUed Ia tnInsfer nr ancumbel' !he property upon whId1 Wodc 18 perfonned, until aD sums dUe rmd 0\VIng to TCf ImIe been paid. Customer st1a1l uec:ute and deIlver any finandng 81aterne1'118 or other dalOlo/llllill1\5 Ihat TOT rQ8Sllrl8b1y rflqU8$1ll forlhe perl&Gtign of Ten &eCUrllw Ir1tertm '" CUstcmer's propel1v and CUstomer sh8lI do aD 0IhGn' 1Icll5 necessary for the porfocIIon sncI pteservallan of IhIfi IIllc:UI'IIy Inter&frl. 8. Customer't Remedies. The tlOIe and ElllClwIvv rlllftlldy al CUstomor and !III customers. agenIa and otIer 8flIlIatea In resped of "'"1 dilIm .r1$t TCT ba&ed on or relating to any dPned def8d In the Work or otherwllO re/allng to ltwJ WCII'k, \he Conlnlcl. or these Tenns and CondI1Ions, whett18r sud1 dm Is based upOn 0llI'IIM:I, tort. profe&&Iona4 emn 01' omI88l01l&. strlcl IIBbIIIty or negligence. and wvhether such claim Ia for prapert)' damage. personal Jn1uIy. commen:lal_ or OIJ'viJr monBtary 1osII. ah8lI be~) upon the retwn. reebntlon. or repIaoemBnt by CUstom.. of Cu8tvmefa property upon \MIlch Iha Watt WlI$ performed. I\e ro-parfomllM'lG8 of 8I'ly defeoGve porUan of the Work, Of (II) ~ TC'r'tl vpUon. II Nfund Of llI1ldlt to CUII1Dmer In tho 8ftlOUnt of the pfice paid far the defecIIve pottltln of.. Wclrk CUstomer's remede$ here\.mclw ehJll only be fmlIIatde If (I) TOT hae been paid In full for tho Work p&II'8\l8nl to parag1'8Ph 3 aboVe: (II) TCT Is mtlllBd In deIaIl. In writing, of !he DIaImed darect or other claim wltHn twenty deys of CUstomer's dIacovery thereof ID!il wIIhIn ninety deya after Iha c:arnpIetIan of the Wo*; and (III) TCT 18 petrnl1led to Inepect any and aft property wBh I1Il8PflCl to wNoh lha Work IB claimed to have been defeolt,Ie or to ~ CU8lOn\ef'A olattn Qlherwlse nd8tes. EXCEPT N!i SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH IN THIS SECTION .. TCT SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY LD88 DR DAIlIA8' DIRECUY OR INDIRECTLY ARl81NG PROM I1S Pmv:oRIIANC!i Of l1I& WORK, INCLUDING WITHOUT UMITAlION ANYDAMAGI!TO ClJ8TOMeRf8 PROPERTY. TCT SHAlL IN NO EVENT II! UAIILE FOR MY LOSS OR DAMAGE ARlSIN$ MOM THE USE OF PROPERTY UPON WHlCH THE WORK 1& PERfIOR'IIED OR Aff'f SIMILAR PROPERtY OR FOR Atrf SPECIAl., INCIDENTAL, OR COftSEQUISNTtAL DAMAGES WHATSOEVER. IN NO EVeNT F:\8har_OR~llII ClllldlllallllWlDI .1ifl oArieII1Il11 dOC P.e5I1i!IS 8tfALL TCT EI.JML& FOR,." Dt8AGE8 MOve THE ca&T 011 1'HE WORK. WHETHER IUCIf DAllA8ftSIW.L ARlIE FROII8IIiACH OF THIS CDN1ltACT. OR It TORr. OIton.....d. t. C8DG.~ A ptl'ChaeeGRteror oth8r ConIraCt for Wal onc:e placed with ..... acc:epltId by lCT can be oanoeRed. In whole Gr In pBrt. only. U1e written COI1lIe11t of TCT. If CuBIOmet canceIB wlthOul TCT'. consent. Customer shall be! liable for the run prIoe of \he Worft, _ any IIClU8IItdrd ptrly ctlq)8I198l\ 8f.IV8d by TeT in nol tl8VIng to perform the Work. 88 r88SOI18bIf determfllIlCI by TeT In lis 8018 cIlsclwIIan. 10. Court and OthBr Proceedings. TI1e f18Iufe aI TCT'$ ~ wIU. !rom Ime 10 alme. require em~ee& of YCT 10 present the I'88UIt$ of TCT& fIncIItl(pJ In cIepasItIans. Gl:lIIll proceerJ\np 01' oIher 1'anJm$. In such CIiI88S. the CU8tamer will be c:haIged, In ackI\tkIrI tu the lQ88d upon price for .. \NQ$. TCT'I UllUlM and _my =* and fees for 8UCh pl'8SllI1taIan8 end the .,t'8P8I'a1lon ~ acconIIng to TCT'& IJ1enocUrrent fee 1lCheduIe. If YCT lIiIlIWpo8ll88d by a party oIh8r.... Q.n5lomer. the IOttd ClG8l8 Bnd feeS ~"'hrd wIftt the pr8p&II8tion and tedmonYwID be c:fvIrged to IheCuatomfll'.II.......,..ctiYe of wheIher payment ha& JQYiou8IJ beon mllde on the WOrk etId CUStomer's IIIe IS cIDSed. lCT will at Customofa lIlIrIU8n request a1U1mpt Ia hli1ve tI1ese cosl$ and lees RIlmburaed by the plllty IseuIn9 tI1e subpoena; however. If such party dORl5 not reImburS& TeT, &Ud1 c:ost& and r8B$ will be the reIlpCInliidty I>fCU&lOtner. CUIlomer agtealllo p.sy an~ such coq III1d fees. irt8llplolQlve of whether IIIlJ riGlpated at the Urn" of the Conrt8ct IMI TCT will be I:aIIed upon to pr$Unt the resuI1B of Its fltldl.," deposltlor1s. court prccaadlng9 or other forums. 11. Forco M8fouro. 111$ ~rtIes horoto lllhall he Gl<CU8ec1 from u." d.d., to) r...lder lImeIJ porfotmanCfJ nf aJ'1y obIIO&b01l hsreum.er if SUQ1lnab111ty 10 D8f\'0rm hi CHUl1ed dIrec!Iy or b'dlrtlCtly by i'Ict 01 C"tOd. flood. war. riot. aCt:ldant. explosion. 8tfllum nr 18hnr lroublll. act of government. deI-r or deflNI1 by SUbc:antrttotor or suppllcl uf InalerlalK orIl6rvl~. Iho oxIalt.'1lG6 of any c1rct.rlTl8lallCw maklno pertormance comnlflrCl$lly Impractk:8bla or Bny oUrer cauae beyond!hc party's MI$OOlIbl8 control; provided. hoWeVer. !hath cbllg$tlon lo make paymanIs due under thIa agroam8l'lt ll..n not be exoused for any relIlICII1, IncIudlng d1Cl ~. 12. Waiver of Compliance. \/Val1M' by ellher party hereto of a bf'eacII by the other patIy at lJI1)' of the provIsIoofl of these I.errn$ and condIIIona s1lalI not be deemed a __ of fUture COl'I1l)1Im\CCl ttrerwItr. and BUc:h provIaIona 9haR remain In run forc;s end effeCt. ,3. 8eYGrablULy. If any provision or remedy htnln provided fllr be Invalid urtcIer any appIlcabJe law. lhe remaining provisions henIof. including rem8lnlng default remBd1e8. 811811 bR given eIf8ct In aCC01'ClanOa with the Inlent herGof. 14. GovernIng Law. ThIs agrerament lIhaII be govemad by 8Ild construed undat Ule ItM8 ollhe State of Nor\f1 CarolIna and Iho UnIted States of America. 1 &. ArbItnJUOIl Any controversy or claim Clrl8lng aul nI or relating to thfa agrsement. or ~ breeoh thend. shsII be seltled by arbltr8tlDn lit 8QCadEmC8 with the Rules of Ihe Amartcan ArbItnItIon Assoc:IaIlo'l. and judgmem upon the lNIrd nmdered by the Albltrstcr(s) may be entInd In any COIQl having JurisdfctlDn lhereof. The $IW$ of said II1DItr8tIon abaII be Charlotte. North CanllIna. Any _and far erbItrBtIon by el1hw parly hereunder must be deHvered In wrltlng ID lhe oIhOr party. TOTRL P. 85 33 16 August 2007 To: Dallas Larson, City Administrator From: Paul PaIzer, Public Works Director/Building Official f.'" R.e: ,2007 sidewalk: :repair project II II 1IIII1 II I III II I J II J I IIIIII I III III II II I II I II II I I I I I I II I II I II I have received quotes from the following venders for the replacement of hazardous and d9111aged sidewalk panels as previously ideJ'ltified. The repJ.acement project includes those items as attached. Homeowners will be responsible for all private facilities within the right of way including irrigation systems, invislole fencing. and plantings within 3 feet of the sidewalk." The contraCtor will replace any damaged sod and the homeowner Will be responsible for the watering~ I recommend that the Council con1:l'aCt With Andrew Ross Concrete 8nd Masonry for the quoted work of 198 panels and 5 pedestrian ramps and include the balance of the 80+ panels and 12 pedestrian ramps in town for the per tIllit Cost as proposed not to exceed $42,OOO.00~ The quotes are as follows: Panels Pedestrian Ramps Site work AD.drew Ross Concrete $128.50 $430.00 Included Jim Gregoire Concrete $211.20 $400.00 Included Frontier Concrete $i48.50 $1,2~0.OO $2,334.50 3;/ ~~~l!..'W.'~~;h~:1~\\.i.:.~,."h...:l.I\"ht:~'~<u;';"\l.\~"'\.'_'~'-_~"l'bl..-.:.l\l~' -'OJo:.l-'~l'..4l~'-~''l>.':'-!'U=''~;'':'\''u..ol''\ll'__I'''~ ......~'oti.L'-...'--U!..""-l;..~.":..-...-..u!-'-\Q.)......,, .....".W>I.-hu. "_U"""'-~' '''''__'''~''''\'_'''""--__''''''''~'_.'--''-'___ .....___..,...__ -'~. .............. ..,_ ....,_....... .__ _......_ __._ ~ :1. .. - -----~-~- ----- --~----------- - -------------- -----------.--- --------- ------- - ! " I .' PROPOSAL ~~ .R.ass.. '-t2.4L.( ~1A.1\J ~..o.,(" " rJ \ l.t...- PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO: Co~~ ~ \)Lh/-L- MAl ,~,~ fYt~~ 1 G 3 -7'-/l--'f7 "I D~ I ~ WORK TO BE PERFORMED AT: ,I ! ',! !: I,j I: '. , ARCHITECT All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawingS and specifications submit! I r ab \Ill 1NOjIs.and compI.Illd In a substan 'a! -anllke manner for . sum of X ~ ~ ' ^-)c ><.. Dollars ($ . / with payments to be made as follows: .\ Respectfully submitted Any alteration or devfaIIon from above specIIIcatfons invoMng extra costs wiD be executed only upon wrItl8n order. and wID become an extra charge Per over and above the, estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, ac- cidents. or delays beyond our control. c(f-- /)- 07 A^*LlAJ RJa r~ Note - This proposal' may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within ~ 0 days. Date Signature .08118 _ MADE IN USA PROPOSAL 36' . ~ N, ,'~ .. " "_~~.~~,yo. .-.......~]) "d)' ...........~ ,,,,,..,:,~,,,, .n. """n.. ,~'tt"'" ' ""U," ,-.,...,,,.,.:.., '~~-l-'''.'I>,,,-,,~,,,,,,,t''.'''''I.'_-'b''..,,,.~, .'.h......~."hT> ,......... ......t<."......,~......,.....~ .,.....,...."..... "-'''''''''''''l.nLl.=n'",(~ .u."'....'\l'.i'{...l"..:."h\~'\;.\....t-l.:~Tonmr><!1o.I..a . '. 8-15-07 Jim Gregoire CODerete Jim Gregoire 16720 Henna Ave Hugo MN, 55038 651-755-9646 ~ Bid for The City of Centerville on sidewalk replacement. Jim Gregoire Concrete will replace the sidewalk: in the tfti of CenterYille'in accordance with their requirements. . Concrete will be confbrmed to the Mndot spec 2461. The pedestrian ramps will include trn1lCated dome panels by CoJ4 Spring Granite Co. 2" minlmuJn thicknesS or Hanover detectable warning paver. The truncated dome will be cured for II minimlq)'l of 7 days before joint sealer is applied. The joint being 1/4 - 1/2 inch in thickness and sealed with Dow Corning 888 or NS pari:ing st:ruCture se911ltrt. Truncated dOmes in red. All concrete will be coated in the appropriate curing compound within 30minutes after fini~hing and II second application perpendiCularly to the first 4-8 hours later. . Joints will be saw cut and removed as r~ An appropriate sealer will be used upon the .cities specific request. All panels will be II m;nimum of 4' thick no thicker tba:i1 4 ~ ' and in II broom finish. Caution tape will be used around aJl4 corners of each individual panel and any driveway street si4es before and after placement of concrete. Any work that seemS unacceptable will be reviewed between the City of Centerville and Jim Gi'egoire for replacement upon request. This includes any replacement" of asphalt. Tnn Gregoire Concrete will take precautions to protect any placement of concrete but however will not be responsible fur the replacement of any damages done by vandalism effective 6 hours after paneljob is completed. The requested installation of backfill, pulverized black dirt and sod will be cared for Within the 72 hours after the placement of concrete. Per unit pricing is as followed: Pedestrian Panels: $400.00 per ramp panel 4XSft Panels: $211.20 per panel The final cost for the replacement ofsidewa1k will. be: $42,873.60 This price is for 198 sidewalk panels and 5 pedestrian ramps. The panel price is the same 1 ()OIG more or less according to spec sheet. 3/P ~'--------------'-~-~- ~ ~ ~~ . _. _ . .~,......, . >",-,"",,""'n..' ~_~_, '_~_"'_'" ~ .." """"'-'......"...~ .............,...-...nc.......L~............ __.................. ......H_.. ~............UO'L........... u..,.........u............., ......,,"'....." .... ....~<"..,... .......,.,..' .":"'......._"__'-.ft........._ - . ) . Frontier Concrete & Masonry IDe. 3323 91stLaneNE Blaine, MN 55449 (651)308-1101 fron1ierconcrete@oomcast.n Estimate M:: I -:. I Name / Address Centerville Public works Paul Palzer RE: City Sidewa1ks Project Desa;ptIon Qty , Rate Total , - . Concrete 5' x 5' panel section's 4" thick 198 section's Removal 198 148.50 29,403.00 and Disposal Saw cuUing ea, as per plan Specifications (paul PaJzer ) Concrete Pedestrian nunps (Five Individual locations ) Truncated 5 1,250.00 6,250.00 dome panals as per specs 50- per it Site Work Inciden1als; Caution tape , BarriCl"s, Clean up and 2,030 1.15 2,334.50 forms remova1 wi1h backfill and or seed 2,030 L.F , Site Work Concrete will conform to Mndot spec 2461 with type 3 air-entrainment #4000 psi w/6% air Surface of sidewalks will be as specified on Detail (PaUl Pa1zer Plans and permits - . by City Our company will offer 2% Disc, 0.00 0.00 according to work performed on a timely matter I ~ Total $37,987.50 31 / ""'....... DRAFf....______n________ __on ____n___ _____ ___n____ _ ___ - ---- n_____J - DeIeIIld: #I DdIlIIld: 1ft o. il DeIebId: 38 " . :,' , :: i Delebld:30.frl..JWAVOllAL'U!_121 ,~' , ::: DeIIIed: 30.02 , . . . . 0 OBDINANCE&........___n____mn___n__m__nn______nnn________J i i. Delllllld:by SECOND SERIIS i I! DeIIIIIId: addiag , '" i !I; DeIIIIIId: iosediIIa the tb1lowiIIs ANOBDINANCEAMENDINGCllAPf.D.aq"-~_~~~~~~~~---j ffii Dellbld:B BY AMENDINGSECTION~LOCJ_~~~~~_~ ALWA: S /liil DeIIIIIId:) $:,1,', fill. D.I"'dual(P')as~ TIIE CITY OF CENTERVILLE ORDAINS: t:::.' ......... L CocIc _~J}~JllIi!i!luIDIiI!!!!~-~U~--m-mm-----mfi~:: ~: (F) Water SUDDlv Restrlct1Dns..._____m_n_ _ _ m__ _ ~::: ~:' --- iDsatiDathe CaIIowiDgas R"~" _Oo"'_ _...... _00 ____.... ..___ ___ ____.. ___............Oo __.._............ _00_-" ~:,'\".. ~ .,:, , Delllllld:seGIiaa (1) D--:PlsJ ho Ii ""':-"11_ T Aa..AAft at' . bibited ' ,~", betw~ho~~flli~m-~ r~~;;:;t:i-ffiro:=berTfor.--\\~~\~ =8 all addreSSeS on ;ill daYs. This section shalJ qw\y onty to those residents and water S01D'Ce is .... \ \~:' DeIebId: (M connected to the ci{y water system. Use of private wells is exeIQpt from this section .... \, \~ w____ ... 'o,'o, _a.ran_ . \\, x-teihhla , F~....dbld r-..4h.d (b) Residents wbose address ends in an even nnmber may water their ...___n_ ""'....... lawns and gar~ bef~ 10:00 am. and after 6:00 p.m. onty on even-numbered days. Delebld:M and residents whose address ends in an odd number may water their lawns and gardens :. IIIseIUld:M before 10:00 am. and after 6:00 p.m. only on odd-numbered days. :/. DeIebId: E ,{,',' t.,\ Water s......... 1<"__ . In th t nf emeroencies af'f"ectino the Citv's abilitv t' l ~n.e"'JIOPIIlI\IIlfI .. m to SU1)ulv wa~~as lden~iit~~~~atei~~c~d c~tro:-Plm~the ci1;-J /.' Delllllld:FailmetDobeya.W8If_fBl ~;~tor~~ ;U~QJized to itnplement water use restrictions and demand reduction measures as /.'.' Dellllld:DrdlartfMap'. 'l'hD1f::lif . tn _ _ n_ _ n n_nn__ __ _________ _n_ __ ____ _ ______ n__ n___ __n_ _ n' _______ ____ _ n__ __._ n _. __ _ n_n__ _ n j.'...> DeIIIIId: <II> shaD . . '1_ n___ _ _ ___. _ ____ _____n___ n___ _ ____ n.__n___n _____ ____ _ ____ _ _ __n ____ _ ____nn_n____ _ ____ n________ _ ___ _____ _ ____ - ---- n____ ___..:i::.-- DeIIIIIId: <11>. aball--8It - [10] ~ ~__~-~n~~~~!I~~~~-~~-~~!Y.~-~-P-~~~-------- DeIIIIId:! and publication according to law. DeIIIIId: I PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED tbis ~~n~f.. .__~mJ'.!__~__~!tJ_/{-_:::: =-'~ Council of the City of Centerville. 't .~~:,~"" ""~ .~:.>, ., ':.\ DeIIIIId: ... \'.' DeIetelI: Auaust '. \\ .. 'o,' IIIseIUld: ADJD8l DeIebId: 6 --- -- -- -- - - - --- -- - --- CITY OF CEN'l'EBVILLE ANOKA COUNrY,MINNESOTA (a) New lawn sod and/or lawn seed is exenu>t for two weeks after installation: resid~ts may water both odd and even days with no watering from 10:00 am. to 6:00 p.m. ""'~ CITY OF CENTERVILLE BY: Mary Qq>ra. Mayor ATTEST: "" IIl1bA ..- DeIIIIIId:, I ,:::::::: ::::::::::::::: :::: ::::::::: ::: :::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::: :::::::::::::: - - - - - - DeIIIIId: l' Teresa Render. City Clerk ~ r::B'f - r:l41 r=rsr r::r&'i r-::--rur r:1Uf 3i --------------------------~------- --- ---- ------------ I · - - - __ __ - - - - - - - - __ _____ - - u - ___ - - - - - - - __ - - __ - _n - - - ___ u - __ - - ___ - __ - - - __ - - - - - - - --- - -- - ---- - - - - u -- - - - --- --- - -- ---- -- - - -- - - - -- - --- - --\: - - -- n,' u,' n,' ",' ~~ \\ " " " " II " .. . .. . ~~ ' .. .. .. D8IdId: . . _ _ _ _ CITY OF CBNTBR\IJLLBI , ..... .BY:......~ . . . . . . .MllIyCapu. Maya1 ATTJISl:. , . . ! : D8IdId:T_a.k.Cilya.k D8IdId: , T_Bunda1 CiIy CIcrk, Puh1iB1IldIa the Quad CaamamiIJ Press \ CID J\ugust22, 2lO6l( ......."dhA left, Jadent: Left ff', \ Rrst _ ff', tfWIhemd8 ~, T_~ Cilya.k' Puh1iB1IldintheQuad~Press CID J\ugust22, 3lO6I _ _.----{ D8IdId: l' I w_ - u_n___ u___ ____ - ---- - - __n _____~--n-- - u__ - ____u_un__ - u_ - - __u - _u ____u___n___ - __u __un_u __u u__ u__ - u_n___ n_ - ---- 39 ------~~- - ---------- --------- l;jr._~(.J;~I~Ji~I!l":.;:icC;{it.:L::t;~~i&;::bL~<c;'::2---;'-.~:cBJ",;,J~;~~];i~~i~~~:';i,~2;J,;_3fL8J_~~;: Font: Not Bold '''.JJ;l31JteJint . ...., ".", ,...~,', :~~:_'n;2:ti0,~,,~.;;L;;~i, 38.02 ,......;n;~::c;i :~__L MAYOR AND COUNCIL .... ~ .m.,........ Km a..... 8/13/'.1007 2.1:58 AM Font: Bold, Italic .....1: [4] FeL,At"- Kurt a. Glaser 8/13/210711:51-- Font: Bold Page 1:[S) ........ Kurt....... 8/13/.711:55 AM Indent: Left: 0.5" -"'1:[81lrGlfcJ~ ' . ....-1C1Irt.. CU8leJ'8/13/2OOl##lS AM Left, Indent: Left: 0.5", First line: 0" ....1: [7]......... Kurta. ...... 8/1312007U:07 PM There are no penalties which are specific to this Chapter. There are only the general penalties from section 10.99 which apply to this Chapter. Therefore, specifying penalty fur this Chapter (which don't exist) is like multiply times "0", it equals no". Ifnothing is said here the section 10.99 applies. Did you have something else in mind; like a civil penalty? Administrative fine? Admin tine would be my choice ...... .....1: [8J VII.t. Kurt a...... 8/13/200712:05. Failure to obey the water use and dementi reduction measures shall be a violation of this chapter. ....1:'-'1 OelJ.J:_;'~,-", .",101ofl~-1tM ," Duties of Mayor. The mayor sba1l preside at meetings of the council and shall have a vote as a member, except that the council shall choose from its members a mayor pro tem who sbaU hold office at the pleasure of the council and shall serve as mayor in case of the mayor's disability or absence. The mayor shall exercise all powers and perform all duties conferred and imposed upon the mayor by ordinances of the city and the laws of the state. The mayor shall be recogJ'i7,ed as the head of city government for aU ceremonial purposes, by the courts for serving civil process, and by the governor for purposes of marital law, but shall have no administrative duties unless specifically ordained. The mayor may deliver b1essages to the council and the public, ineluding a comprehensive message on the aJ"nual state of the city. ;~_bl;,;i:.jli~,".!J.tHI~~"-P~'E' i.~~Dl'~iUJf.'... ,L_-i,:..:';,;-!,-~~ .'.,:..WM~~l"', i Duties of the CmmciL The council, including the mayor sitting as presiding officer of the council L_...~tJ.O~~,_~","<'s",....?i"""'<,----".I~tl'..~L--"--~~>-"""-'......' . ..:"L...., lo/~L"~~_J , shall exercise all powers and perform all duties conferred and imposed upon its members by ordinances of the city and the laws of the state. Consistent with the responsibilities to accept considerable leadership over the general conduct of city affairs, the members shall study the operations of the city government, and I'ecommend desirable changes and improvements to the council. To that end the members must perform all of the duties of office including but not limited to attendance at all regular and special ;)1)' ----------------------~~--------~~ --- ------------- ---- -- ---- meetings to the council, and all attendant and supporting duties such as service on, or liaison to committees of city government or city services, serving as public representatives of the city, and by generally educating themselves about the affairs of government by listening and responding to members of the COfJ'mllnity. "'1: [U] .....a4IIBd T_...... 8/14/...10:48 AM Superscript l~~~l;~l~~~-.~- _~~_~~~~~~....~C-L . .....~.u...cc. ., ,-.'1Ol~__~~~~ Indent: Left: 3", First line: O.Slt 1/ tervi{{e T,staUisfiec{1857 1880 !Main Street. Centervif'(e, !M!N .5.5038 651-429-3232 or PtVC. 651-429-8629 August 10, 2007 Memo to Council The attached Wellhead Protection Plan (Draft) is included in the agenda packet for your review. The agenda suggests Council action scheduling a public hearing for November 14 and directing that the WHP draft be forwarded to concerned local and state agencies. After the public hearing and input from the public agencies, the City will be required to adopt a final WHP. We hope that the process will be completed by the end of2007. Dallas Larson, Administrator - ----- ~--'---------~----- t~1 ~ ~ ,. City of Centerville WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN Part 2: Draft July 3, 2007 (Date) I l . CeNTERVILLE TABLE OF CoNTENTS Chapter 1 - DATA ELEMENTS AND ASSESSMENT 1 I. Required Data Elements .................................... .......................................... 1 Physical Environment Geology Precipitation Soils Surface Water Resources Land Use Data Bements Land Use Community Setting CUlT8nt Land Use Future Land Use Development and Redevelopment Public Utilities Wells and Well Probability Potential Contaminant Source Inventory Water Quantity Data Elements SUrface Water Quantity Groundwater Quantity Water Quality Data Elements Surface Water Quality Groundwater Quality II. Assessment of Data Elements... ...................................................................... 9 Use of Wells Quantity and Quality of Water Land Use in DWSMAs Groundwater Use In DWSMAs Chapter 2 -IMPACT OF CHANGES ON CITY WELLS..................... ........................... 11 I. Changes Identified Physical Environment and Land Use Surface and Groundwater II. Impact of Changes Water Use Influence of Existing Water and Land Programs and Regulation Administrative, Technical, and Financial Considerations Chapter 3 - ISSUES. PROBLEMS. AND OPPORTUNmES... ...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 13 I. Land Use Issues Related to the Drinking Water Supply Management Areas Other Wells Management of Potential Contaminant Sources Public Awareness and Cooperation DWSMAs Extending Outside the City Boundaries Evolving Wellhead Protection Program II. Flnanciallssues Implen'1entation Costs State SUpport III. Issues Disclosed at Public Meetings and Submitted Comments Chapter 4 - WELLHEAD PROTECnoN GOALS......................................................... 15 I. Public Education Wellhead Protection Awareness Project Hazardous ~Materials Management Education II. Other Wells Management Seal Abandoned Wells Monitor Well Construction III. Contaminant Sources Potential Contaminant Source Inventory (PCS!) IV. City Programs Integration Zoning, Development, and Redevelopment Control Incorporate Wellhead Protection Initiatives Into City Plans V. Water Quality and Quantity Management Groundwater Quality Protection Minimize Demand on Water Supply System and Groundwater Chapter 5 - PLAN OF ACTION................................................................................ 17 I. Public Education Wellhead Protection Awareness Project Hazardous Materials Management Education II. other Wells Management Seal Abandoned Wells Monitor Wen Construction III. Contaminant Sources Potential Contaminant Source Inventory (Pesl) IV. City Programs Integration Zoning, Development, and Redevelopment Controls Incorporate Wellhead Protection Initiatives Into City Plans V. Water Quality and Quantity Management Groundwater Quality Protection Minimize Demand on Water Supply System and Groundwater Chapter 6 - EVALUATION PROGRAM............................................................... ....... 23 I. Wellhead Protection Progress Report . II. Incorporation of Wellhead Protection Plan in Comprehensive Plan III. Communications Chapter 7 - CONTINGENCY STRATEGy..................... ... ... ... ...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 24 I. Water Supply System Description and Evaluation II. Water System Emergency Plan Interconnection with Adjacent Communities Procedures for Water Allocation III. Water System Conservation Plan Water Conservation Potential Water Conservation Programs Wellhead Protection Program IV. Items for Metropolitan Area Public Suppliers Implementation Program FIGURES 1. Drinking Water Supply Management Areas 2. Annual Precipitation and Evapotransportation 3. Soils 4. Geologic Sensitivity 5. Land Use 6. Zoning Within DWSMA 7. Storms Sewer Map 8. Protected Waters, Wetlands, and Ditches 9. Sanitary Sewer Map 10. Transportations Routes 11. Watermain Map 12. Floodplain Areas TABLES 1. Monthly/Annual Precipitation (2001-2006) #. Potential Contaminant Source Inventory APPENDICES A. Location of Probable Wells B. MDH Source Water Assesment C. 2006 Drinking Water Report Chapter 1 Data Elements and Assessment I. REQUIRED DATA ELEMENTS In accordance with the Minnesota Department or Health's second Scoping Decision Notice (May 15, 2002) the following data elements are presented and assessed as it relates to the City of Centerville's municipal wells. The Wellhead Protection Area (WH PA) and Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) of Centerville's Well #2 are vulnerable to contamination from ground surface and near surface sources. Well #1 is not vulnerable. The City's DWSMAs are provided in Rgure 1. The City has evaluated the following data elements to determine their significance in the preparation and implementation of this wellhead protection plan. Physical Environment Geology The geologic environment, surrounding Centerville's municipal wells, influences the delineation of the WHPAs and well vulnerability classification. The configuration and characteristics of geologic strata directly affects the infiltration of water and aquifer vulnerability to contamination. A county geologic atlas does not exist and focused geologic studies In the metro region do not provide relevant data for the City's wellhead protection plan. No surface geophysical information was identified. The Minnesota Department of Health performed a geologic and hydrologic assessment of the region surrounding the City wells to aid in determining the wellhead protection area and vulnerability. Part 1 of this plan describes the geologic strata, WHPA, DWSMA, and vulnerability of the City's well. Review of representative borehole geophysical and well.construction records in the DWSMA indicates that the aquifer units used by the City's wells (Jordan and Prairie du Chien) are under low-permeability protective materials typically described as sandy clay with a thickness of greater than 50 feet. The geologic review indicates that regional precipitation, soil characteristics, and surface water resources influence the aquifer units used by City wells. The regional influence of these environmental elements extends beyond the City's DWSMAs and exceeds the scope of this plan. Precipitation Precipitation recharges all aquifers. Recharge of the confined aquifers, used by City wells, takes place on a regional scale encompassing large areas outside the City's DWSMAs. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has maintained a system for monitoring hydrologic data that addresses precipitation within the metropolitan region. The primary source of moisture for precipitation in Minnesota is the tropical maritime air that moves into the State from the south and southeast. The spatial variation of average (normal) annual precipitation across Minnesota is determined by proximity to these moist air'masses coming northward out of the Gulf of Mexico. Therefore, southeastern Minnesota, averaging near 32 inches, receives more precipitation than northwestern Minnesota, less than 19 inches. July 3,2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 1 The normal annual precipitation for Minnesota (1961-1990) is 27.01 inches. The presence of moist vs.. dry air masses also helps to determine the atmosphere's ability to absorb water vapor evaporating from soil and open-water surfaces, or transpiring from leaf surfaces (evaporation plus transpiration is called Bevapotranspirationj.Westem Minnesota, more frequently under the influence of dry air masses, has higher evapotranspiration rates than the eastem half of the state (see Figure 2). Temperature plays an important role in determining the amount of energy available for evapotranspiration. Because temperature patterns are determined mainly by latitude, southern Minnesota experiences more evapotranspiration than in the north. Due to its position in the continent, Minnesota is located on the boundary between the semi-humid climate regime of the eastern U.S., and the semi-arid regime to the west. Semi-humid climates are areas where average annual precipitation exceeds average annual evapotranspiration, leading to a net surplus of water. In semi-arid areas, evapotranspiration exceeds precipitation on average, creating a water deficit. In Minnesota, the boundary between the climate regimes cuts the State roughly into east-west halves (from Climate's impact on water availability; MN DNR). Centerville The City is within a semi-humid region where average annual precipitation exceeds average annual evapotranspiration, leading to a net surplus of water. No active precipitation gaging stations have been identified within the City of Centerville that can provide consistent data over extended periods. However, the Climatology Wo~klng Group (a cooperative effort state and academic organizations) has developed an interactive web site to locate and access precipitation data for the Centerville area. Based on regional data the metropolitan area receives an average annual precipitation of 28 inches. Based on a 2o-year compilation of the nearest National Weather Service approved precipitation gage stations the City's average annual precipitation is 33 inches. Local precipitation is presented in Table 1. Soils Soils, within the City's DWSMA, influence the infiltration of water. The General Soil Map of Anoka County (US Dept. of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service, 1974) indicates that the area of the City's DWSMAs consists of the Nessel-Dundas-Webster Soil Association. The Nessel-Dundas-Webster Soil Association consists of nearly level to gently sloping moderately well drained and poorly drained soils formed in loamy glacial till. Figure 3 provides the Centerville section of the Anoka County General Soil Map. A regional study of shallow geology, including soils, has been performed to determine the sensitivity of the uppermost aquifer to contamination [Regional Hydrologic Assessment - Anoka Sand Plain (RHA-1), Minnesota Department of Natu.ral Resources, 1993]. The geologic sensitivity of the uppermost aquifer to pollution is Blow" to BmoderateB in the City's DWSMAs. Sensitivity ratings are based on the estimated tirne-of-travel for water-borne contaminants, at land surface, to reach the uppermost aquifer. Low sensitivity rating indicates time-of-travel from decades to a century. Moderate sensitivity rating indicates time-of-travel from years to decades. Figure 4 provides the Centerville section of the Geologic Sensitivity Map. Water Resources Surface water resources in the City consist of Centerville and Peltier Lakes and Clearwater Creek (County ditch 47). The lakes are located in the western portion of the City approximately one-half mile outside of the City's DVVSMAs. Clearwater Creek flows through the southern portion of the DWSMA for Centerville Well #2 and defines a portion of the DWSMA July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2). Page 2 ~-~------~------~ The regions major rivers (Mississippi, Minnesota and St. Croix) used ndwater flow boundaries to determine the regional flow field within aquifers are not within the City. The regional flow field was a critical influence in the delineation of WHPAs in part 1 of this plan. The City wells draw water from the Prairie du Chein and Jordan aquifers. These aquifers exhibit confined hydrologic conditions indicating a natural hydrologic barrier from land surface. Land Use Data Elements Land use within the DWSMAs is determined using the Anoka County Geographic Information System and the Property Tax Records databases. The parcel Property Identification Numbers (PIN) and land use status (agricultural. residential, commercial, industrial, and tax exempt) are cataloged within each DWSMA Tax exempt parcels can include govemment-owned land, parks, public works facilities, public and private schools, and religious institutions. The purpose of reviewing land use is to determine the extent of existing classes of land use and predicting future changes that may require additional city wells or system capacity. Land use changes also affect the presence of potential contaminant sources that may be introduced or removed from the City's DWSMA. Community Setting The City of Centerville was incorporated on August 11, 1857. The name was chosen because of its central location between St. Paul, Stillwater, and Anoka. This was the main rest stop between Stillwater and Anoka in the earliest days of the Minnesota territory. It was originally settled by Messrs. Peltier, laValle. and laMotte, who platted the town in 1854. Hunters and trappers were attracted to the area in the early 1800's because of the abundance of lakes and wildlife. Families from Canada settled in the area because it reminded them of their homeland. Several descendants of the original settlers still fIVe in Centerville. Centerville honors its history and heritage. The City celebrates its rich French-canadian heritage at the annual Fete des Lacs (Festival of Lakes) summer celebration. The settlers cleared the land for agricultural use which became the focus of the area's economy. Businesses that supported agriculture followed. Centerville is a 2.2 square mile City located in the approximate center of the City of Lino Lakes. In the year 2000, Centerville's population was 3,202 representing an increase of 96% from the 1990 census. The City's population is estimated to increase at a rate of approximately 15% during the next three (10 year) census periods (2010. 2020. and 2030). Centerville is a suburban community that aspires to maintain its little town character. Located between the shores of Peltier Lake and Centerville Lake, residents enjoy the rural setting. The caring community that makes up Centerville is evident when people pitch in together to build park equipment, plant flowers at the school or clean up the town on Earth Day. Centerville's Past and Projected Population and Households Year 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Population 1.633 3,202 3,700 4.100 4.700 Households 519 1.0n 1.340 1.600 1,850 Source: MetroDOlltan Council and US Census July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 3 Current Land Use Centerville consists of approximately 1,450 parcels in the City's 1,408 acres. The overwhelming majority of land use is residential (1,310 parcels). The 29 improved commercial and industrial parcels are concentrated along Main Street and 20ni Avenue. The remaining 148 acres of agricultural land is found in 10 parcels located primarily in the southern portion of the City. These agricultural sites present the most prominent areas of the City that may change to another land use. Figure 5 provides Centerville's land use. The two Centerville DWSMAs cover 397 parcels. Well #1 DWSMA covers 53 parcels and Well #2 DWSMA covers 344 parcels. Ten parcels in Well #2 DWSMA are located in the City of Lino Lakes. They consist of five agricultural parcels (totaling 154 acres); one single family residence parcel; and four commercial parcels (two are unimproved). The commercial parcels include an automotive service garage and fast food restaurant. The five agricultural parcels represent over 70% of the land in Centerville's DWSMA readily available for development. The City recognizes the importance of groundwater sensitivity and has established environmental protection policies that will enhance protection of groundwater in the City and the region. The City will continue to require compliance with MPCA Rules Chapter 7080 for the design, installation, maintenance, expansion and repair of private sewer systems. Aquifer contamination is usually not as much a concern in areas that are served by public water and sewer utilities, as opposed to areas that depend upon individual on-site sewage treatment systems. Approximately 23 residents and businesses are currently served by septic systems in Centerville. Parcels in Centerville's DWSMAs land Use Classification Well 1 Well 2 Not Vulnerable Vulnerable o 7 o 4 52 201 o 9 o 96 o 5 o 9 o 2 o 6 1 5 Total Parcels 63 344 Future Land Use Development and Redevelopment The Centerville Comprehensive Plan provides Ii guide for managing future growth and redevelopment to maintain the community's character. Figure 6 presents the City's zoning July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 4 map. Environmental Element. The City has developed policies directed at the preservation of natural resources in areas undergoing consideration of future development. Specific environmental factors which are addressed in order to insure protection of the natural resources in the City and surrounding areas include: · Groundwater Supply and Quality · storrnwater Drainage/Surface Water Quality · Erosion/Sedimentation .Control · Shore land Management/Floodplain Protection · Wetland Protection Groundwater SUDDIv and QuarJtv. The impact of actions within Centerville regarding groundwater extends beyond the City's limits. Contamination of groundwater from fertilizers, herbicides, industry, construction, landfills and effluent form wastewater treatment facilities may affect the quality of water retrieved from wells iocated in and surrounding the City. Public Facilities. The City does not anticipate a need for any major public facility buildings in the foreseeable future. Public and institutional uses include City government buildings, schools, churches and medical facilities. The City will continue to conduct an ongoing evaluation of public facilities and make improvements as needed. Utilities Staaina Plan. Due to limited amount of land available within the City, it is anticipated that all the developable land within the City will be serviced by water and sewer by the year 2015. The City will examine existing sewer and water assessment policies for their impact on infrastructure replacement and development. New policies will be developed and implemented as needed. TransDOrtation The Anoka County Highway Department is considering options to improve transportation between Interstate 35E and 35W highways that may include the expansion of Main Street (County State Aid Highway 14). Uno Lakes An area of Centerville's DWSMA #2 is in Uno Lakes including fIVe large unde"eloped parcels of 15- to 4O-acres. Uno Lakes has tentatively zoned these areas for future commercial and industrial development within the next 10 years. Uno Lakes requires commercial and industrial development to include municipal sanitary sewer and water services. Wells and Well Probability Early development within the City typically preceded the presence of the municipal water supply system. As the City Initiated and expanded its water supply system, the homes and other buildings with private well water systems were. encouraged to connect to the municipal system. In certain cases homes and businesses, originally connected to the City's water supply, have installed a private well for Irrigation or other purposes. Only the Minnesota Department of Health may license well contractors and permit the construction of wells in the City. Wells represent a potential threat to groundwater resources if not properly sealed when they are abandoned. Contamination that is spilled or leaked on the ground must migrate through many layers of soils and geologic formations before entering deep aquifers typically used by drinking water wells. This separation acts as a natural barrier requiring decades to centuries July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 5 --------- ------------- ---~-------- - -.-------- -----------~------- - -~----------~---~ for contaminants to affect the quality of deep wells. However, pollutants entering an abandoned well through a damaged cap or corroded casing are rapidly introduced to the aquifer that could contaminant the water supply of nearby wells. The City has performed a survey of each property within its DWSMAs to determine their potential to have a well. The survey compared the recorded year of construction with the year that City water was made available. Buildings constructed before City water was available are determined "probable" to have a well on the property. Buildings constructed in the same year that Centerville water main was available for connection, or later, are determined "not probable" to have a well on the property. The status On use, not in use, abandoned/unsealed, or sealed) of "probable" wells was not determined. The Minnesota Department of Health is the authority that regulates well construction, maintenance, and sealing in accordance with Minnesota Statute Chap. 1031 and Minnesota Rules Chap. 4nS. Of the 397 parcels located within the City's DWSMAs, 94 have been identified as probable to contain a well. Of these probable well sites, 71 parcels do not currently have a City water main available. Matching the property locations with the Minnesota Department of Health's well records has identified that one of the probable well sites has had a well sealed. Appendix 1 provides the results of the Well Probability Study for properties within the City's DWSMAs that are probable to have a well. Potential Contaminant Source Inventory Centerville's Well #2 DWSMA has been classified as vulnerable to contamination from surface and near surface contaminant sources. To assess the risk to Well #2, the City has developed an inventory of potential contaminant sources within the DWSMA from information provided by the State and Anoka County Community Health and Environmental Services. The Potential Contaminant Source Inventory (PCS/) includes: registered hazardous substance storage tanks; leaking underground storage tanks; removed storage tanks; licensed hazardous waste generators; licensed agricultural chemical storage sites; and soils and groundwater clean up sites. The PeSI was developed utilizing the Anoka County Environmental Site Inventory Database that is a parcel specific. Other potential contaminant sources that cross through multiple parcels (e.g. petroleum transmission pipelines) are address in the following sections of this chapter. Table 2 provides the results of the City's PCS/. Contaminant sources may be introduced or removed from the City's DWSMA as ownership or land use changes. The PCSI has identified seven properties haVing potential contaminant sources. It is noted that the identified potential contaminant sites are commercial, industrial, or exempt land use. An exception is one resldentlal-comrnerclal property haVing a single family house and commercial building. Public utilities Public utilities including roads, storm and sanitary sewers, and gas/oil transmission pipelines are constructed, maintained and monitored under Federal and State guidelines to prevent and respond to contaminant releases. PiDelines (Transmission) No gas/oil transmission. pipelines are identified within the City's July 3, 2007 DRAFT Page 6 Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) - --~-- --------~------------ "-------------~---- ~--------------- --~---~-------~-- DWSMAs. Public Drainaae Public drainage systems are maintained and monitored by the City and Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) in accordance with Metropolitan Surface Water Management Ad. The City has construded a network or storm sewers in developed areas that discharge to ditches and surface water bodies. RCWD manages and maintains the ditches, creeks and lakes for proper use and to proted water quality. The City and Watershed Distrid coordinate surface water management through their comprehensive plans. A map of the City's storm sewer system is provided in Figure 7. A map of the protected surface water, wetlands and ditches is provided in Figure 8. Sanitarv Sewers Sanitary sewers serve aU of the developed portions of the City. A few on- site septic systems are currently in use at large area properties that were associated with the remaining agricultural lands. The City is committed to expanding its sanitary sewer system with future development. A map of the City's sanitary sewer system is provided in Figure 9. TransDOrtation Roads provide the principal mode of transportation within the City. The roads serving Centerville include: State Trunk Highways (STH) and County State Aid Highways (CSAH) providing transportation across the metro region and State; County Roads (CR) providing transportation across the County, and City streets providing access to individual properties within a subcJivision. The significant transportation arteries in the City are 20TH Avenue (CR51/CSAH21), Main Street (CSAH14) and Centerville Road (CSAH21). The City's DWSMA crosses the City limits and includes a portion of Interstate Trunk Highway 35E in the vicinity of the intersection with Main Street. A map of major transportation routes within the DWSMA is provided in Figure 10. MuniciDal Water SUDply Since 1988, the City has operated a public water supply (PWSID 1020036) that currently serves 3,600. The two City wells provide all the water to the system. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources manages the City's water use through its Water Appropriations Permit Program to ensure an adequate supply that meets long-range requirements. In 2002, the total volume of water pumped from the City's wells was 66% (71 million gallons) of the permitted amount. A representation of Centerville's water-main map is provided in Figure 11. The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) oversees the safety of the City's water supply. The MDH Community Water Supply Unit is responsible for assuring compliance with the federal Safe Drinking Water Ad (SDWA) program. Preparation of this Wellhead Protedion Plan is required under the SDWA Appendix 2 presents the MDH Source Water Assessment for Centerville's municipal wells. Currently the City is .permitted to withdraw 108 million gallons of water from its wells each year. In 2002, the total volume of water pumped from the City's wells was 71 million gallons. Water main extension to 800 properties is planned for the next ten years. The water main extension projed will include all the remaining properties within the DWSMAs. Interconned with Uno Lakes. In 2001 an interconned was construded to permit Uno lakes and Centerville to draw water from each other's systems. The interconned is metered and monitored. It is anticipated that the interconned will proVide additional reliability. Water Quantity Data Elements July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 7 -- - - ------ ----- ------------------ ~--------- - --- - ------- Surface and groundwater resources are deemed Public Waters (or Waters of the State of Minnesota). The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) manages the appropriation of water from public waters through its Water Appropriations Permit program. It is the mission. of the ON R to monitor public waters and take necessary conservation measures to protect the resource from excessive withdrawal. Surface Water Quantity Centerville and Peltier Lakes are partially located in the City. These lakes are part of the Rice Creek chain and are used as reservoirs for the City of Saint Paul's public water supply system. Centerville Lake covers 455 acres with a maximum depth of 19 feet and a Littoral area (POrtion of the lake that is less than 15 feet in depth) of 276 feet. Peltier Lake covers 465 acres with a maximum depth of 18 feet and a Littoral area of 412 acres. These lakes discharge their water to the George Watch Lake located immediately west. Clearwater Creek (County Ditch 47), which flows during wet periods, discharges into Peltier Lake. This creek and other County and private ditches and small ponds comprise the remaining surface water found in the City. The potential flood zones provided in Figure 12 are associated with lower land areas along the lakeshore, ditch and creek. Groundwater Quantity The City's wells utilize the Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer unit to supply water to its public water supply system. Other aquifers in the area include the Quaternary (sand and gravel aquifer that lies above the Prairie du Chien-Jordan) Franconia-Ironton-Galesville, and the Mount Simon Hinckley. A 1990 investigation by the US Geological Survey (Effects of Present and Projected Ground- Water Withdrawals on the Twin Cities Aquifer System. Minnesota; Water-Resources Investigations Report 90-4001) indicates that the total 1980 groundwater withdrawals (200 million gallons per day) represents apprOXimately one-half of the safe yield of the regional aquifer system. An approximate limit for groundwater availability in the region is from SOO to 800 millions gallons per day. This investigation included groundwater withdrawals for lake level augmentation and building cooling systems that has since been prohibited by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The Minnesota Geological Survey's (MGS) County Well Index (CW/) and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources' (DNR) State Water Use Database System (SWUDS) were utilized to identitY high-capacity wells in the area that could affect the delineation of the City's WHPA. Three high capacity wells have been identified to fall within one-mile of Centerville's wells. Information on these groundwater appropriations is provided below. With the exception of the City's municipal wells, no groundwater observation wells have been identified within the City's DVVSMAs. DNR data of regional groundwater elevations provide information on trends in groundwater quantity. Also, the pumping records and static water levels of the City's wells continue to be collected to determine the trends in groundwater quantity and availability. No well interference problems have been identified by the DNR within Centerville's DVVSMA or the region. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 8 ---------------------------------- -- - ---- -__02--___________ Permittee Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Water Appropriations Permits1 Centerville Area Resource Permit # Permitted MGJY2 2002 Reported Pum e Gordon Rehbein Farms 776489 55.3 Lacasse C ril 776104 24.0 2.4 Lino Lakes Well #4 Groundwater CSTl 856168-4 335.Q3 69.1 1 adapted from the State Water Use Data System (SWUDS) 2 million gallons per year for all wells permitted 3 This rmitted number is for the total withdrawal b Lino Lakes' 4 wells Water Quality Data Elements Protection of quality of surface and groundwater resources is primarily the responsibility of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA is responsible for administering the provisions of the federal Clean Water Act in Minnesota. To coordinate the protection of surface water resources the MPCA has organized its management programs based on the 10 major drainage basins. All of Centerville is within the Upper Mississippi River Basin. The Basin is made up of numerous watersheds including the Rice Creek Watershed. The Basin approach improves State coordination with local watershed districts. Surface Water Quality The MPCA has listed Clearwater Creek (Peltier Lake to Bald Eagle Lake), Centerville lake and Peltier lake in its 2002 Clean Water Act section 303d List of Impaired waters. To respond to the degradation of these surface water resources the MPCA has established Target Maximum Dailey loads (TMDl) of the pollutant cause of the impairment. The City is coordinating efforts with the Rice Creek Watershed District to improve the quality of its surface water resources. Groundwater Quality Groundwater samples from the City's wells are routinely collected and analyzed for a wide variety of elements, minerals, compounds, and radioactive substances. Annual reports of the results of the analysis of City water are provided to users of the water system and available at City Hall. No contaminants have been detected in the City water supply at or above the State regulatory standards. The result of a tritium test of Well #2 indicates that the well is susceptible to rapid infiltrations (since 1953) of surface water. Currently, some contaminants were detected in trace amounts below action limits including lead and copper. The highest level of Nitrate (as Nitrogen measured in rrulligrams per liter) measured in the water is 0.45 rng/L. Appendix 3 provides the Centerville's 2006 Drinking Water Report II. ASSESSMENT OF DATA ELEMENTS Precipitation, Soils and Surface Water Precipitation, soils, and surface water are not wellhead protection planning elements because July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protecticm Plan (Part 2) Page 9 the aquifer units used by the City's wells (Prairie du Chein and Jordan), exhibit confined hydraulic conditions. As a result, these elements influence the aquifer on a regional scale which is outside the scope of this plan. Use of Wells The City's wells provide ample water volume for current demand using peak demand controls during high water demand. Additional wells and system infrastructure may be necessary if (or as) development proceeds. Consideration will be given to construction of future wells to a depth that dra\NS water from a non-vulnerable aquifer. Monitoring and maintenance will continue for the upkeep of the wells. Quantity and Quality of Water There is a sufficient quantity of groundwater available to supply the City's system in the foreseeable future. However, long-term groundwater availability is not taken for granted and must be evaluated periodically to determine if City or regional issues develop. The quality of water from City wells meets the criteria of the MDH for drinking water. The City will continue to cooperate with the MDH to monitor its well water quality to identify any developing issues. The wells will continue to be used as groundwater quantity and quality monitoring points. Land Use in the DWSMAs The majority of land within the City's DVVSMAs is single- and multi-dwelling residential use. The commercial and industrial land use represents the majority of potential contaminant sources within the DVVSMAs including petroleum storage tanks, hazardous waste generators, and contamination cleanup sites. The parcels classified as exempt include State, County, and City operated facilities that may include potential contaminant sources. Groundwater Use in the DWSMAs City wells represent the dominant use of groundwater in the DWSMAs. Other users include private home wells, commercial and industrial wells that do not have significant impact on the . availability of groundwater for the City wells. Commercial, industrial, and other public water supply high capacity wells draw sufficient volumes of groundwater to possible Impact on the City's WHPAs and were considered during delineation of WHPAs. Changes in groundwater use by other wells may impact the configuration of the City's WHPAs. The availability of groundwater to City wells is not considered to be impacted by other wells within the DWSMAs, but monitoring of static and pumping water levels may be utilized to determine trends in groundwater availability. July 3,2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 10 Chapter 2 Impact of Changes on City Wells I. CHANGES IDENTIFIED IN: Physical Environment and Land Use The City of Centerville had experienced a significant growth in population during the 1990- 2000 census. This is reflected in the change in land use principally from agricultural to residential. Some commercial and industrial development has taken place as well. Future changes in the physical environment will be driven by development such as expansion of storm sewers to replace ditches. TransDOrtation The Anoka County Highway Department is investigating options to improve traffic flow between Interstate Highways 35E and 35W in the Centerville-Uno Lakes area. A potential change could include the addition of freeway ramps for 35W at Main Street (CSAH14). A corresponding improvement of the highway would be increase commercial traffic through Centerville. Well #1 DWSMA No changes to land use within the DWSMAs for Well #1 are expected. The DWSMA covers an area fully developed (between 1989 and 1994) with single family homes in three subdMsions. The remaining large parcel is a City park. Well #2 DWSMA Land use within the DWSMA for Well #2 includes 5 agricultural parcels larger than 20 acres that are located in the City of Uno Lakes. These agricultural parcels (over 150 acres and zoned for future commercial and industrial development) represent the greatest potential for changes to the physical environment in the DWSMA Surface Water and Groundwater No significant changes are noted to surface water or groundwater. II. IMPACT OF CHANGES Water Use The demand on Centerville's water system is expected to increase by 60% in the next 10 years. It is planned to install water mains to the remaining development areas. The remaining 71 properties, in the City's DWSMAs, without water main access are included in this ten-year project. The Water System Management Plan (1997) details the expansion of the City's water system. Influence of Existing Water and Land Programs and Regulation The City's zoning and development controls guide development within the community principally to establish compatible land use development and redevelopment. Some development controls (e.g. septic system ordinance, surface water management section of development ordinance) address potential contaminant sources on a property regardless of its zoning classification. The State has numerous environmental management statutes, rules, and programs that influence construction, location, and maintenance of facilities and land use activities that represent potential contaminant sources (i.e. underground petroleum tank program). The Anoka County Groundwater Protection Assessment (June 1995) lists the potential contaminant source activities and facilities managed through State programs. Some July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 11 management strategies include mandates of the City to adopt minimum regulatory standards. These standards are modified when deemed necessary. For example, the. mandatory septic system construction standards were modified to require improved wastevvater treatment in wellhead protection areas. Administrative, Technical, and Financial Considerations Protection of the water quality has been address through a series of programs at the state and local level of government. These programs have focused on management of facilities and activities that have the potential to contaminate water and the City's water wells. The City will utilize these programs to provide the necessary protection of its wellhead protection areas. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 12 ------------ - --- - ~--- Chapter 3 Issues, Problems, and Opportunities I. LAND USE ISSUES RELATED TO THE AQUIFER, WELL WATER AND DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREAS other Wells Unused, old, abandoned, and improperly maintained wells pose a significant threat to City wells. Such wells can act as a conduit for introduction of contaminants directly into an aquifer. Since 1974, the Minnesota Department of Health, through its Well Management Program, has permitted the construction of wells and licensed contractors. State law and rules apply to all wells, including those constructed before 1974. Through the Well Code (MN Rule 4725) the MDH regulates the construction of new wells and sealing of unused wells. The City is prohibited from managing wells construction. The problem with managing wells within the DWSMA is that the existence, location and status of a majority of the wells are unknown. The City has an opportunity to enhance wellhead protection by cooperating with the MDH Well Management Program in locating and sealing abandoned wells and documenting the construction of new wells within its building permits program. Management of Potential Contaminant Sources Existing management of potential contaminant sources presents an issue and opportunity for the City's wellhead protection plan. Many of the potential contaminant sources or groundwater management issues that exist within the DWSMAs are monitored and regulated through a labyrinth of state agencies and programs. These programs (detailed in the Anoka County Groundwater Protection Assessment) focus on a single land use or activity by a designated state agency such as: Hazardous waste generators - MPCA and County Environmental Services; Commercial agricultural chemicals and practices - MDA; Petroleum and hazardous substance storage tanks - MPCA; Well contractor licensing, construction code and maintenance - MDH; Water appropriations by large capacity wells - MDNR Soils and groundwater contamination - MPCA; and Soils and groundwater contamination related to agricultural chemicals - MDA The City exercises ,uland use controlu though its zoning and development ordinances but preemptive State programs for the environmental management have addressed facilities and activities that represent potential contaminant sources within the DWSMAs. The Anoka County Groundwater Protection Assessment has cataloged the various potential contaminant sources, management programs, and opportunities to enhance groundwater protection. The Assessment was used to assist the City in developing this Wellhead Protection Plan. Public Awareness and Coopera~ion The success of this wellhead protection plan rests on the cooperation of property owners, residents, and businesses within the City's DWSMAs. . State programs manage many of the potential contaminant sources at commercial and industrial sites. But the management of sources on the numerous residential properties (that make up 84% of the City) may not be adequately addressed. The variety of activities and contaminant sources that residents may introduce within the City's DWSMAs is broad; Property owners informed of the community July 3, 2007 . DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 13 effort to protect the drinking water supply are likely to cooperate with requests and guidelines to protect the City's wells. DWSMAs Extending Outside the City Boundaries The Drinking Water Supply Management Areas for Well #14 extends outside of the City into the City of Lexington. Fortunately Lexington is a partner in the City's water utility management program and wellhead protection planning group. Evolving Wellhead Protection Program The evolution of the state's Public Water Supply management program is a consideration for the City in wellhead protection plan preparation and implementation. As experience is gained - the plan itself sometimes must be altered as program mandates are altered or expanded. For example, the potential for a terrorist attack lead to immediate upgrade of the security for the City's water system. Such an alteration represents a significant cost when an early investment of resources and detailed planning is altered or abandoned. However, a measured approach permits the City flexibility to respond to new Challenges and observe the effectiveness of initiatives as we move along a planned path to achieve our protection goals. Nonpoint Source Pollution Management Many programs currently exist for the management of nonpoint sources of water pollution from residents and property owners. These existing programs provide an opportunity for the City to enhance the protection of its wells by emphaSizing existing nonpoint source management initiatives that address water quality within the DVVSMAs. II. FINANCIAL ISSUES Implementation Costs The cost of implementing the wellhead protection plan is a consideration. This mandate is made without providing sufficient funds to comply. As a result, the City must balance its revenue with increasing fiscal demands that include the implementation of the wellhead protection plan. State Support State support for the implementation of the Wellhead Protection Plan is in the form of providing advisory and cooperation in existing programs. No funding is provided to implement the Plan. However, the Minnesota Department of Health has provided valuable support to the City in the preparation of the first part of the plan by delineation of the wellhead protection areas and well vulnerability assessments. Such support by existing State programs can enhance the City's plan. If State programs O.e. well management, hazardous waste management, ground water cleanup, etc.) were not effective; the City may have to determine its role in regulating these potential contaminant sources to protect its wells. In a sense, these programs reduce the financial burden of the City to manage these potential contaminant sources. III. ISSUES DISCLOSED AT PUBLIC MEETINGS AND SUBMITTED COMMENTS The Metropolitan Council submitted the following comments on regarding development of the City's wellhead protection plan: , · Upon submittal of WHPA delineations, the Met Council will determine the adequacy for review as a local comprehensIVe plan amendment, and notify each city on how it will proceed. · The Met Council will be lOOking for special protective measures for the numerous Drift wells, particularly in the vicinity of J<nown groundwater contamination areas. July 3, 2007 '. DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 14 --------- ------------- July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 15 Chapter 4 Wellhead Protection Goals Ultimate Goal The ultimate goal of this wellhead protection plan is the sustained quality and quantity of groundwater for the City's water supply system. To achieve this, the City has identified goals to address specific initiatives and issues. I. PUBLIC EDUCATION A. Wellhead Protection Awareness Project An education program is critical to protect the City's water supply and gain the cooperation of property owners and businesses within the DVVSMAs. The goal of the Wellhead Protection Awareness Project is to notify property owners and residents of the location and coverage of the City's DWSMAs. B. Hazardous Materials Management Education This effort will educate residents and businesses regarding proper handling, use, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials within the DVVSMAs through augmentation of existing environmental education programs. This initiative will not address businesses that are currently licensed hazardous waste generators already required to meet State management standards. II. OTHER WELLS MANAGEMENT A. Seal Abandoned Wells , Cooperate with the MDH Well Management Program to seal all abandoned wells within the DVVSMAs. The City has developed a list of properties, within its DVVSMAs, that have the probability of having a well based on the date of the construction of the building and the date when City water main was available to the property. B. Monitor Well Construction Cooperate with the MDH Well Management Program to monitor and maintain accurate records of the construction of wells within the City. This project will improve the location accuracy of constructed wells by having a local official verify the location information submitted by the licensed well contractor. III. CONTAMINANT SOURCES A. Potential Contaminant Source Inventory (PCSI) Determine the extent of potential contaminant sources located inside the City's vulnerable DVVSMA for Well #2. The PCSI will be maintained to monitor contaminant sources. IV. CITY PROGRAMS INTEGRATION A. Zoning, Development, and Redevelopment Controls Determine the compatibility of utilizing City land use and development programs to enhance wellhead protection. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 16 B. Incorporate Wellhead Protection Initiates into City Plans The City will use this Wellhead Protection Plan as a resource when updating its Comprehensive Plan, local water management plan, water supply plan, and other relevant plans. v. WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY MANAGEMENT A. Groundwater Quality Protection Monitor the chemistry of the aquifer units providing water to its wells and investigate significant changes in water quality. B. Minimize Demand on Water Supply System and Groundwater Efficiently use of groundwater resources available to the City. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 17 Chapter 5 Plan of Action I. PUBUC EOUCA TlON PROGRAM An.educatlon program Is critical to protect the City's water supply and gain the cooperation of property owners and businesses within the. DWSMAs. A packet .will be developed to present the various education materials to the property owners and others within the DWSMAs. Additional packets will be provided to new properly owners and facility operators. A. Wellhead Protection Awareness Project Objective: The cooperation of property owners, facility operators and others is critical for the City to achieve our wellhead protection goals. The Wellhead Protection Awareness Program is intended to gain the cooperation of residents and business operators in the City's wellhead protection efforts. Actions: (1) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will notify property owners that they are located within the City's DWSMA. The notification will include a wellhead protection education packet providing information on the City's wellhead protection program. (2) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will installed signs In the right of way indicating the boundaries of the DWSMAs. (3) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will include wellhead protection information in their annual water quality report of their water supply system. (4) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will prepare a press release and issue a briefing report for newspaper and other media outlets on timely issues that coincide with an initiative such as an abandoned well information meeting or the installation of DWSMA zone signs. (5) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will make DWSMA maps available to consultants, septic system evaluators, and other interested persons that perform environmental evaluations. Cooperator(s): [City] Anoka County Municipal Wellhead Planning Group, Anoka County Environmental Services Time Frame: 2 1/2 years from the completion of the plan. Estimated Cost: ($ 1.50 per parcel within DWSMA) Goal Achieved: (1) Preparation and delivery of a wellhead protection information packet. (2) Installation of ROW signs indicating the boundary of DVVSMAs. (3) Annual Water Quality Report that inc.ludes WHP update. B. Hazardous Materials Management Education Objective: Educate residents and businesses regarding proper handling, use, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials within the DVVSMAs through augmentation of existing environmental education programs. This initiative will not ~ddress businesses that are currently licensed hazardous waste generators which are required to meet State management standards. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 18 Actions: (1) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will include proper management of hazardous materials and waste information into the Wellhead Protection Awareness education packet. The packet will include contact numbers to obtain consultative services from City, County and State program staff O.e. utilities, hazardous waste management, and petroleum tanks programs). (2) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will utilize newsletters, cable access, news releases and other forums to promote the proper management of hazardous materials including use of the Anoka County Household Hazardous Waste drop-off facility. Cooperator(s): Anoka County Integrated Waste Management Unit Time Frame: 2 1/2 years from the completion of the plan. Estimated Cost: ($0.50 per parcel within DWSMA) Goal Achieved: (1) Preparation and delivery of a Hazardous Materials Management information packet. (2) A 5% increase in the number of households that utilizes the Anoka County Household Hazardous Waste drop-off facility. D. OTHER WELLS MANAGEMENT The presence of other wells within the City's DWSMAs presents the potential for contamination sources, at or near land surface, to be rapidly introduced into the aquifer used by the City's wells. Eventually, all wells become unused or unusable. State law requires unused wells to be properly sealed. However, the location and status of wells has not been adequately monitored. A. Seal Abandoned Wells Objective: Enhance the protection of the City's wells by Cooperating with the MDH Well Management Program to seal all abandoned wells within the DWSMAs. Actions: (1) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will investigate potential sources of financial assistance and the establishment of a program to assist property owners in sealing their abandoned wells. The investigation will include Federal and State grant programs and a City low-interest loan program. (2) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will notify property owners with the probability of a well located on their property. The notification will include contact numbers for property owners to obtain consultative services regarding methods to locate and seal abandoned wells and an announcement of a public Informational meeting. (3) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will sponsor a public meeting in which MDH Well Management staff will provide an informational program and answer questions. (4) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will request that the MDH provide a copy of well sealing reports. The location of the sealed wells will be verified and placed in the building officials parcel files. (5) The Building Official will incorporate the list of probable wells into the City's Building records. When application is made to demolish a building the records will be reviewed to determine if a well search is required. DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 19 July 3, 2007 - -- --- ----- - --------------- ---- Cooperator(s): Minnesota Department of Health and Anoka County Environmental Services. Time Frame: 5 years from the approval of the plan. Estimated Cost: ($0.20 per parcel within DWSMA) Goal Achieved: (1) Completion of the investigation and actions initiated. (2) Completion of notification to property owners. (3) Completion of public meeting. (4) Incorporation of probable well sites into City parcel files. B. Monitor Well Construction Objective: Cooperate with the MDH Well Management Program to monitor and maintain accurate records of the construction of wells within .the City. This project will improve the location accuracy of constructed wells by having a local offICial verify the location . . information submitted by the licensed well contractor. Actions: (1) The City Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will request the MDH to provide a copy of reports for new well construction in the City. The City will place the copy into the building official's file for the parcel. If information regarding the location of the well is Insufficient to determine the parcel location - the City will notify the MDH and request that they follow up with the licensed well contractor to obtain sufficient information. (2) The City Building Official will place the copy of the well record in the parcel file which is reviewed when application Is made for building permits or lot development. (3) The City Utilities Department will require owners of buildings that switch from a private well to City water submit a copy of the well sealing report within a months. If the well remains in use the property owner must submit a statement of the intended use of the well. The well sealing report or statement of intended use will be forwarded to the building official to be place in the parcel file. Cooperator(s): Minnesota Department of Health. Time Frame: 5 years from the approval of the plan. Estimated Cost: ($0.20 per parcel within DWSMA) Goal Achieved: The goal is for sustained monitoring of constructed wells through a cooperative effort of the City and MDH. This is an ongoing project without a date for completion. m. CONTAMINANT SOURCES A. Potential Contaminant Source Inventory (PCSI) Objective: Track the extent of potential contaminant sources located inside the City's wlnerable DWSMA The PCSI will be maintained to monitor contaminant sources. Actions: (1) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will maintain its PCBI database making updates July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 20 to the inventory as new information is collected. (2) The V\ellhead Protection Plan Manager will regularly request that Anoka County Community Health and Environmental Services Department provide updates of potential contaminant source information from its Environmental Site Index. The City will incorporate new and changed information into itsPCSI database. Cooperator(s): Anoka County Community Health and Environmental Services Department Time Frame: This is an ongoing activity. Estimated Cost: ($O.07/yr. per parcel within DVVSMAs) Goal Achieved: (1) Current PCSI database. (2) Demonstrated cooperation between the City and Anoka County. IV. CITY PROGRAMS INTEGRATION A. Zoning, Development, and Redevelopment Controls Objective: Determine the compatibility of utilizing City land use and development programs to enhance wellhead protection. Actions: (1) The V\ellhead Protection Manager will make presentations before the City Council, Zoning Board and other relative committees about methods to enhance the City's wellhead protection plan. (2) The V\ellhead Protection Manager will consult with planning and zoning officials to determine the feasibility of modifying official controls to support the protection of the City's water supply wells. Draft modifications will be presented in the form and manner required for consideration. Cooperator(s): City Council and staff Time Frame: 2 years from the completion of the plan. Estimated Cost: ($0.12 per parcel within DVVSMA) Goal Achieved: (1) WI-! P Manager's presentation to City Council and other committees. (2) City consideration of modification of official controls to support wellhead protection. B. Incorporate Wellhead Protection Initiates into City Plans Objective: The City will use this Wellhead Protection Plan as a resource when updating its Comprehensive Plan, local water management plan, water supply plan, and other relevant plans. Actions: (1) When the City's Comprehensive Plan is next updated, a section will be added to address wellhead protection initiatives that are in this wellhead protection plan. (2) The City will include compatible wellhead protection initiatives into its local water management and water supply plans. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 21 (3) The City will cooperate with the City of Lino Lakes to address land use management issues for the portion of the DWSMAs outsid~ the Centerville. Cooperator(s): City of Lino Lakes. lime Frame: Coincident with the City of Lino Lakes Wellhead Protection Plan preparation. Estimated Cost: ($0.04 per parcel within DWSMA) Goal Achieved: (1) Updated comprehensive plan completed that includes wellhead protection initiatives. (2) Local Water Management Plan that includes wellhead protection initiatives. (3) Water Supply Plan that includes weUhead protection initiatives. V. WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY MANAGEMENT A. Groundwater Quality Protection Objective: Monitor the chemistry of the aquifer units providing water to its wells and investigate significant changes in water quality. Actions: (1) The Wellhead Protection Manager will continue to monitor the water quality of its public water supply wells in accordance with MDH rules. (2) The results of the monitoring will continue to be summarized in the City's annual Water Quality Report. (3) The City will create and maintain a historical database of water quality testing results for its wells. The parameters that will be monitored include concentrations of organic and inorganic compounds, radiological results, and microorganisms detected. The database will be reviewed periodically to determine trends in water quality changes. (4) If review of the database indicates a significant change in the concentration of a potential contaminant, the will consult with the Minnesota Department of Health and attempt to identify the source(s) of the pollutant using its PCSI database. Cooperator(s): Minnesota Department of Health lime Frame: 1 year from the completion of the plan. Estimated Cost: ($0.05 per parcel within DWSMA) Goal Achieved: (1) Existing water quality monitoring programs continue to be implemented. (2) Water Quality Reports are dissemin~ted annually. (3) Creation of a historical water quality database for City wells that is updated with routine water quality test results. . B. Minimize Demand on Water Supply System and Groundwater Objective: Efficient use of groundwater resources available to the City. Actions: (1) Continue to enforce Centerville Ordinance #63 that prohibits lawn/garden watering during the day and odd-even sprinkling ban dUring the morning. Ordinance is in effect July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 22 -------------------- from May 1 through September 1 throughout the City. (2) Educate residents and businesses on good water use practices and water conservation. (3) Require water-conserving fIXtures in construction ordinances according to state policies and codes. CooperatorCs): None Time Frame: This is an ongoing activity. Estimated Cost: ($0.05 per parcel within DWSMA) Goal Achieved: . (4) Existing water conservation programs continued to be implemented. (5) Ban of mid-day sprinkling implemented. July 3,2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 23 ---- ------'-- ----~--- ____~___o----L--___________ ______ ~______________ ___ _______. Chapter 6 Evaluation Program The evaluation program will determine the progress of the City to implement its plan of action. Evaluations must be conducted at least every 2.5 years or when the wellhead plan is amended. To evaluate progress in achieving plan goals the City will perform the following. I. WELLHEAD PROTECTION PROGRESS REPORT Every two years the Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will prepare a Progress Report that will: 1. Discuss developments that have affected the Wellhead Protection Plan; 2. Briefly discuss the outcomes of the Wellhead Protection Awareness Project and Hazardous Materials Management Education Project; 3. Ust the number of wells sealed in the City since adoption of the plan; 4. Provide an update of the Potential Contaminant Source Inventory; 5. Summarize the historical and most recent water quality monitoring results; 6. Summarize the historical and most recent water use data and briefly discuss the effectiveness of efforts at reducing water demand; and 7. Present a plan for action to meet the remaining objectives of the wellhead protection plan. II. INCORPORATION OF WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN IN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The \l\kllhead Protection Plan will be incorporated into the City's Comprehensive Plan during the next plan update. III. COMMUNICATIONS The City will maintain records of contacts for the distribution the wellhead plan and \l\kllhead Protection Awareness Project. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 24 -- ----'._----~--- ~----'-~-~~---- ----~-~~---------- ------- ---- - - -.-- 'I Chapter 7 " ,", > Contingency Strategy for Water Supply~ The following summarizes the City's alternative water supply plan and contingency strategy that is detailed in the Comprehensive Water Plan - City of Centerville (February 1997). Water system characteristics, water user priority, emergency equipment and contact numbers can be found in the plan. Prior to 1988, the City of Centerville did not have a municipal water system. An initial "Master Plan for the Development of a Municipal Water System" was written in July 1987 to address the development of a municipal water system. In the 1980's and 19908, Centerville experienced rapid increase in population that this plan addresses. Historical Development Trends The City started experiencing dramatic growth during the 19808. This growth trend is expected to continue throughout the next 15 to 20 years. As is commonly the case in rural communities such as Centerville, not everyone within the city limits is connected to and served by the City's water system (due to the use of private wells). In fact, not everyone with a service connection uses the City's water. There are a number of customers who are provided with connections, but who use private wells as their source of water. These customers will be added over time as repair or reconstructions of private water systems are not allowed by the City where Municipal water is available. Planned Development and Population Forecasts The Metropolitan Council's predicted number of households for the year 2020 is 1,750, and the total population projected is 4,650. Projected Service Area Population City of Centerville Year Total Persons per Total % of Pop. Service Area Households Household Peculation Served Population 2000 1000 3.1 3.050 89% 2715 2005 1200 2.9 3.500 93% 3255 2010 1400 2.8 3.950 95% 3.755 2015 1575 2.7 4.300 97% 4.170 2020 1750 2.7 4.650 99% 4.600 Population and household data was interpolated from 1994 Metropolitan Council blueprint forecast data. The percentage of Centerville's population that will be served by City water was determined using the following assumptions: ' · All development in the City what is outside of the current MUSA boundary will be connected to the City's water system. · Service will eventually be extended to some presently developed areas within the current MUSA boundary, including Center Oaks, the Peltier Lake Hills additions, L'A1l1er Estates, and along Centervllle Road between Westview Street and Center Street. Most population growth is expected to occur in the northern, central, and southern portions of Centerville, due to the access provided by proposed collector streets, while commercial and industrial growth is expected to occur in the eastern area of the City. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 25 ---- -- -- -------'---- -------- -- ---- ------- ----~--- Historical Water Use Centerville maintains records of the annual volume of raw vvater pumped from its wells, as well as the volume of vvater sold to its customers. These records permit evaluation of all the components of vvater demand and use by residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional users. Historic Population and Water Service Information City of Centerville Year Service Area Service Total Water Total Water Population Connections Sold (1,000 gaQ Pumped from Wells (1,000 gal) 1999 2550 642 55264 56,707 2000 . 2620 668 66 327 78 652 2001 2732 733 76105 82 865 2002 2855 830 71,169 71 210 2003 2980 868 86 967 97 576 2004 3050 897 82 086 80 867 2005 3110 922 80 167 86 812 2006 3130 935 95 273 96 987 Averace 2878 853 76 669 84 460 Average (w/o 1978 852 76,669 81,460 school DOD.l Service Area population includes Centerville Bementary population of 900 students. Source: City PIllTlDlna and bllllna records Water Demand by Customer Centerville Elementary is the only institutional user. Annual Water Use by Customer Category City of Centerville Year Water Sold (1 000 gallons) Residential Commllndllnst. Total 2000 59110 7210 66 327 2001 62161 10.944 73.105 2002 64,777 6.392 71,169 2003 77160 9,807 86 970 2004 73 030 9056 82,086 2005 70,820 10.186 80,186 2006 81 142 14.131 95 273 Source: City water biDing records Seasonal and Peak Water Demands January alid July vvater pumpages are. typically used to evaluate the relationship between winter and summer use. The table below presents seasonal demands for eight years, average winter and summer daily demands are approximately 154,107 gallons and 402,113 gallons, respectively. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 26 . January I July Water Demands City of Centerville Year Average Pumpage (gpd) July to Jan January JuIv Ratio 1999 89,161 247.126 2.80 2000 125.161 269,580 2.15 2001 254,161 413,870 1.62 2002 148,354 357,096 2.40 2003 146 194 351 ,816 2.40 2004 139 094 478.257 3.43 2005 153,255 485,839 3.17 2008 177,483 613,516 3.45 Ava,<1) 154,107 402,113 2.67 EMERGENCY PLAN FOR CENTERVlLLE'S PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM The purpose of the Emergency (contingency) Plan is to increase emergency preparedness and to provide the City with a course of action to follow during conditions that require a curtailment of water service. Potential situations that could reduce water service include natural disasters such as drought, flood or tornado, or manmade conditions such as water source contamination, and equipment and power failures. Emergency Plans were mandated by Chapter 186 of the state of Minnesota 1993 legislative session laws. The Comprehensive Water Plan has been formulated to meet these requirements, the Department of Natural Resources Rule, and the Metropolitan Council guidelines for water emergency and conservation plans. Emergency Telephone Ust In case of an emergency condition, it is critical that the appropriate IndMduals and agencies are contacted. The City maintains an Emergency Contact Ust that contains personal contact numbers of key staff. Five City staff make up the Emergency Event Evaluation Team (EEET) that performs assignments including contacting communities or agencies in the event of an emergency. During a water supply emergency the EEET will evaluate the condition, contact affected communities/agencies, and determine the City response to cope with the event. Conjunctive Use of Surface and Groundwater Centerville Lake is a possible alternative/conjunctive source of water for the City. Centerville and Peltier Lakes were created in .1912 wit the construct/on of a dam by the Saint Paul Water Utility (SPWU), which owns the water rights to both lakes and much of the surrounding land. Prior to using the Mississippi River as its primary source, the lakes provided as much as 25 MGD, most recently during the drought of 1988. The SPWU would consider an agreement with Centerville to use these lakes as an emergency source of water. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 27 There is a potential for conjunctive use of Centerville Lake and the City's existing wells. However the additional costs and delay in constructing and initiating an approved water treatment plant to achieve minimum drinking water quality standards makes this an impractical option. Alternative Sources of Water Prior to its connection with the City's water system, Centerville Elementary operated its own water system, which included a private well with a capacity of 500 gpm. When the school connected to City water the well was disconnected and used in a separate irrigation system. Considering the age and additional requirements for a public water supply well, the school well may not meet current standards. However, the use of the well as an emergency source would be possible: a The well itself would need to be brought into compliance with state standards for municipal wells. a The City would be required to obtain either ownership or control by easement of the area within 5O-feet of the well. a Equipment modifications would have to be made, including the installation of a booster pump, shut-off valves, backflow prevention device, and chemical feed apparatus. With the anticipated interconnection with the City of Lino Lakes water supply system _ this altemative is not recommended. [NOTE: The City of Centerville and Lino Lakes have established an interconnection between their water systems and a mutual aid agreement to cooperate in responding to a water supply emergency.] Short-Term Demand Reduction Procedures 1. Voluntary Reduction Measures: Contact the media and issue a notice to the City that there is an imminent water shortage and request a voluntary reduction from residents. 2. SDrinklina Bans: Instigate an odd/even or a total sprinkling ban in an extreme emergency. [NOTE: Centerville has established a sprinkling ban (Ordinance #(3) as recommended in this plan.] 3. Water Allocation Restrictions: For extended or severe of emergency conditions, the water use priorities in the Procedure for Water Allocation (listed below) should be implemented. Procedures for Water Allocation The following recommended procedures for water allocation are: First Priority. Domestic water supply, exclUding industrial and commercial uses and use for power production. Second Priority. Water uses involving consumption of less than 10,000 gallons per day. Third Priority. Agricultural irrigation and process on agricultural products. Fourth Priority. Power production in excess of the use provided for in the contingency plan under first priority. Fifth Priority. Uses, other than agricultural irrigation, processing of agricultural products, and power production. Sixth Priority. Non-essential uses. These uses are defined by Minnesota Statutes 103G.291 as lawn sprinkling, vehicle washing, golf course and park irrigation, and other non-essential uses. Non-essential uses of water are the lowest use priority and will be the first water use subject to allocation restrictions. Quick responses to restrict non-essentlal uses of water during periods of limited supplies will help protect domestic and economic uses of water. DRAFT Centervil/e Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 28 July 3, 2007 - -~---- --~--------- t Water used for human needs at hospitals, nursing homes, and similar types of facilities are high priority to be maintained in an emergency. Local water allocation will need to address water used for other human needs at other types of facUities such as hotels, office buildings, and manufacturing plants. Domestic use must have priority over economic needs. Triggers for implementing Plan Components The current average day demand is 265,700 gallons and the average peak day demand for the past eight years is approximately 2.7 time the current day demand, or 715,000 gallons. The 500,000 gallons available storage capacity in the City's elevated storage tank can provide almost two days of average demand and slightly more than a half day at peak demand. Tower level is critical to maintain pressure in the distribution system. The most critical component of the Centerville system is the pumping capacity from its wells. Centerville's firm capacity is 550 gpm (0.675 MGD) with its largest well (650 gpm) out of service. Triggers for implementing plan components are based on firm capacity. The triggers (shown in the table below) are guidelines for the Emergency Evaluation Team in the event of a water supply emergency that warrants short-term demand reduction. Eliminate 5th through 2nd priority water use. Triggers to Reduce Short-Term Demand Tri erin Mechanisms When it is anticipated that demand will exceed 90% of well firm ca c' 0.608 MGD When it is anticipated that demand will exceed 100% of well firm ca c' 0.675 MGD When mandatory sprinkling ban does not keep demand below 100 % of firm ca c' . When firm pumping capacity decreases due to an emergency condition such as well contamination, er outa e brownout or natural disaster. (1) (1) Allocating water use based on the priorities stipulated in Minnesota Statute is not possible with the City's available water use data. Therefore, it is not possible to determine how much water will be saved by various demand reduction measures. Enforcement Centerville has established provisions in its City Code that allow it to place restrictions on water use and enforce any such provisions as necessary. City Code Chapter 51 regulates use of the Municipal Water System, reads, "... the Administrator is authorized to implement water use restrictions and demand reduction measures as identified' in the City's Water Supply and Emergency Conservation Plan.n As detailed in Section 51.05(C), "service may be discontinued whenever.. . the owner or occupant of the premises served.. .has violated any requirement of the city code relative thereton [NOTe Centerville has established a sprinkling restriction to odd-even days and between 10:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 29 Part 2 CIty .ofCenterviUe - Wellhead protecdIon Plan Figure 1 DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREAS 1Q..year Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) The wellhead protection areas are determined using a model that 6Imulates groundwater flow and the captwe zone for each well over a peI10d of 10 years. Drlnldng Water Supply Management Area (DWSNIA) Vulnerability RatIng The DrInking Water Supply Management Areas were established following delineation of the WHPAs. OWSMAs boarders are baSed on easily Identifiable 1andmark8lnc1ud1rQ property Ones, streets, and ditches. .eentervIIle's OWSMAs extend Into the CIty of Uno Lakes. YulnerabUityRatlng The vulnerability of Certervllle's municipal wells and surroundll1J groundwater squiferto contamination has ~n determined thrOUgh evaluation of well construction and aquifer characteJ18tics. Centervlle WeB #1 is designated to be non-vulnerable. Centervi116 \NeD #2 Is deSlanated to be wlnerable. ----------....--- -~--~--~~----~----- ---------- ------ ----- -------~-~~ city of Centervile -Welu.ead Protection Plan Figure 2 Annual Precipitation and Evapotranspiration Normal Annual Precipitation (1961 - 1990) Part 2 An nua I Pre cipitatio nmin us Ev a p otra nspiration From Climate's Impact on Water Availability (MinneSOta Department of Natural Resources) ---_------..--'-----------~~------ ---~-- ------ . Part 2 CilJ of Centem1le -Wellhead Protection Pip Excerpt of plate eo SolI survey of Anoka County, Minnesota; UnIted Slates Oepartntent d AgricluBunt - SoIl ConseMdIon SeMce, Issued September 1977. Part 2 city ofCentervllle - weuhelid Protedlon ptan Page SENSITlVI1Y RATING - EstIrr&ted travel time for water-bome contamtnants l1li SUrface water (LakeslPonds) at land surface to reach the uppermost aquifer Well #1 - Not Vulnerable Very High - HOUni to Months w.l1 #2 - ~nerable HIgh* - Weeks to Years Moderate - Years to Decades II Low - Decades to a Century ---------- City of CentervlRe- Wellhead Protection Plan FIgUl'G 5 Land Use Part 2 o . MUSA &pansion o &.;rt t:O.d ~ CcmamlRial . ImIos1rial [it PubIidSemi-PubJic o VadmtlAgricn1taml .I. School · CilyHaD Source: CentervilIe Planning 0.25 Mites 0.5 .Rec:entPlats fIlCityParkB . Repma1 Pede Reserve ~ FloodpJaip IlwetlaDds - -MUM · Fir<<' Deputmeat . Chmdl City of CenterviDe - Wellhead Protection Plan Figure 6 Zoning WithIn DWSMA Part 2 ~.~ 1 r ~ .a. .1_ :'IF.. '.: ~, .,. ~~ .\' I' \~~.J"I" .. ;A~'\.JT9IL;_n I - .," ~.~ -' ~~. J .. II ,. "0 f;l .. .. ,L.I.I. . \. i: ~: I;- " ~r r-; _ II .,. oI' . · · , ,. · "'1 ~ ~ ;.. ";"'1..' l"I" ... -t- _ . :-/ .-(:";r I ~' " ..-'II KI'~ . . , 1&...; I L}o., -jij' 1'\' ~ ..... ''';''' .. "'", 111'" .,..., , ~ " , . L ,'J " ~.. ,\...' .. ~ T . "... , :....,-;- ~~.. I" "j. .. -~.,....~" 7 ~, ~ -.:' ,";"'. · "'I T .1, ,,Iu:.~, . ,!lf1'~ ". " ~ "/", -; ,;- ~ _ 1 ." · Q. \11 " · .,pl .. - -I " .... , "'~ .. , .'. ~.'-i. ." .. -r~.....' .......\. l'!'" ~ -.-- "- .....ft. '_' I, ~. 15J. I~ \' -:- r I' I,. . I · .1,1', oJ;i , · 'I. r .,~, · " I... ~...II: :' . ~ ~".dl:"''f' , . I' :P1' ;"i T"" ~:! . II · · 'l~,.. I ~ =.., · f I. , · · 1 ..J ~ ,~,", · j ,", ... 7 . I .~ ; :=::~:- ~ IAI' ~. /:' ~ a.. ~ ~ ..:.,;.. ~ ...." .. III '" -.....",.l!.. r;- l';;;;:: =, )- ..,,=...~ ... I'""'~... ro tt" F? \ I I rT U I ; ~-* Hm ;fi~1 _ ~ -r-;- :~ jJ.J. n . 'iQ:; -- ~'I PI . -. 1- ~I I .~<<:tj~. ~~ '-~;. .-:'.:" PI ' Jt~ f\.. ;"/. / ~~'~ ,...;:... ~<" /, 4~.. .;.,. ~q~ '=: ~~... i':\:- B1 · 'S.N::J ," .,., ~ .. '. \- .r1-L -, · - · 'l.\ 115 ~ ''-"7 'UI -laY ;t- ~ .. , ml~~ -~ I~~.r.- . :I.~"l~ ~ ~ ' -.rl~"'"" .Im" .n.. .J H!I ~ ~'1\~ \~~ ~ ~ ~ B1 11I.-0< :11 ~.. Ac;lt-~_~ ~pr- ~ac:I ~ ~ .,.. 11 o ~ ... u h 81 J .. ., " h q 1/ :1 1/ -~ [ ; pf. 1<' . ,i ouS I?/AL . . . · III I , n . I , , . I I I ,/1 ,,?-- -". . - - . - - 11/ - ~ Ill: 01; ...J """ , ~~~. ----~..lt- , --~-~~ . ----.~~ -'" ~~ D Z - ...J Legend B1 CommercIal 11 Industrial R1 Rural Residential R2 Single FamDy Residential R2A High Density Single Family ResidentaiI (sewered) R3 Single FamBy Residential Future Expansion (non- sewered) R4 Single FamUy Manufactured Housing Development R5 SIngle FamUy Residential- Estate P1 Public I Seml-Public M1 Mixed Use M2 Mixer Use Adapted from CenteIViHe Comprehensive Plan - ~~.~< 1ZlI'Ior::P'~'" ~ ti'I.;:Q\,A""-' ----.---,-.-~ 18'DG"'l'..r:eAXfI"E -. - .-.....II'.lI'Z"..... _''''''IG'_ f!!!i!!!J ... . .... ............ City of CenterviUe - Wellhead Protection Plan Figure 7 Stonn Sewer Map Part 2 . - =.~-_..- . I q : I ""~t .~ -=-L-- $- l!P~:-~~-.; ff . ~ I JI /:..,r- - '(~-~=-:_------- II I ....N.. 8'TClIIM _ MAP ~ -- ~ /'2..Cf!rcJ'iJ.le ~~'iiJ/ = ,It.. c... .. ~.. j 1ii4 -- ! i .. Part 2 City of CenterviDe - WeDhead Protection Plan FIgUre 8 Protected Waters. Wetlands. and Ditches o O.2~ 0.5 Miles \-.. '. I::I==~ Adapted from Centerville Comprehensive Plan 1997 (Source Mimesota Dept. of Natural Resources) Part 2 .. -.. ~- .. ... '" ~ . ~ ~ '" ,.J.' r.,1f "lIf 8fi11!R.<< tlE:WER NAP ~ ~~-- ,-..- - ..-- -~-- --"'-- ~.fl"__ _ 01__ .. - ...__...IIIiIIlIlBI_ .- ~ .........,. ~ - - -- ------------- city ofCenterville -Wellhead Protec:tionPlan figure 9 sanitary Sewer Map I oil t" ,,~,.,. l..f~ ~ . ~ ~-~------------'---<-------------~---- Part 2 City of Centerville - Wellhead Protection Plan Figure 10 Transportation Routes ~ Li i ~.~ i::::--~' ~ ,......-- ...~V~ . ,. fI4 .,. 1JII'" 0 ncrtI'IMSt c1WXIillfld car1lUIra'1l1 n:. Adapted from Centerville Comprehensive Plan -- - - LMII..... -....... . ....l:IIIIIas.l - ....... ..... ..... .i- t . . . ;0 . I . i; . . 1- Part 2 .. ff~I-" i ,"_,:'" H' WA1'SiIW<,l YAP - . ..olP_."~ ~......... .. - .... o ....- .. ~:t -"- ---- ~.... e ~ "'---l&-I City of Centemlle - Wellhead Protection Plan Figure 11 . WatennalnMap ... "", . -- I _..:; I II - t . !.I .0,... I~- _ .~~" -, ~ ~ - -I - -11' - -- ...JJ...L- ~ I I I J ~ . ' Part 2 city of CenterviDe - Wellhe8dProtectlon Plan Figwe 12 Floodplain Areas ~ 0.5 MIles L........................I Former 100 Year Flood Boundary 2 .----, RevIsed 100 Year Rood Boundary L-....J (approved by FEMA Jarwmy. 1997) Adapted from CentelVllle Comprehensive Plan ~-' . ' Part 2 City of Centerville - Wellhead Protection Plan Table 1 Monthly/Annual Precipitation (2001-2006) - Year MMM precip Annual Totals Year MMM precip Annual Totals 200 Jan 1.5 200 Jan 0.41 32.89 1 Feb 1.4 28.01 4 Feb 1.8 Mar 1.0 Mar 2.3 Apr 6.51 Apr 3.0 May 4.0 Mav 7.3 Jun 3.5 Jun 3.71 Jul 2.1 Jul 2.7f Aua 3.2 ~ Aua 1.3~ Seot r Seot 4.81 Oct 1.1 Oct 3.5 Nov 2.' Nov 1.2 Dee 0.1 Dee 0.4 200 Jan 0.' 37.76 200 LJan 1.5 36.42 2 Feb 0.7 6 Feb 0.9 Mar 2.4 Mar 1.2 Apr r Apr 2.0 May 3.7 May 3.2 Jun 8.6 Jun 7.2 Jul 10.0 Jul 1.81 Aua 3.21 Aua 3.31 Seot 3.~ Sept 6.1' Oct 4.21 Oct 4.61 Nov 0.0 Nov 1.2 Dee 0.2 Dee 1.91 200 Jan 0.1 26.66 200 Jan 0.6 31.73 3 Feb 1.0 6 Feb 0.4 Mar 1.81 Mar 1.8 Apr 2.7- Apr 4.0 May 6.~ Mav 2.4 Jun 5.7 Jun 4.9 Jul 2.11 Jul 1.7 Aua 0.5 Aua 7.4 Seot 2.5 Seot 4.7 Oct 1.3 Oct 1.0 Nov 0.6 Nov 1.01 Dee 0.8 Dee 1.~ Source: National Weather Service Centerville Station 211420 Target Location: 31N 22WS23 [Lat: 45.16043 Lon: 93:05083] ---------~--- ---~-------~-~ ~ - --------- -- - . ' Part 2 Wellhead P.otecIIon . CentervHIe Table 2 Potential ContamInant Source Inventory CentervlIIe Well f#2 Comer ADL tnc. Bobby & Steve's Auto World 1890 MaIn st. 7095-21Br Ave. 7090-21ST Ave. 233122140018 243122230011 243122240005 ctrvIIIe CIrvIIIe Uno Lakes Name RoSo TrI-li and ConatrucUon Mk:hlIeI MueBner PIN MUftI ContamInant 7137 - 20'1101 Ave. 233122110009 CtrvIIIe 7129 - 20'1101 Ave. 233122110010 ctrvIIIe 7007 - 20lH Ave. 233122140058 CUVIIIe CIty of CenteMDe 7087 - 20TH Ave. 233122140004 CIrviIIe -Adapted from E/WllOnJII8II\B Slt81nVentOly 0lIt8ba8e by Anolal COUnty Conmunlty HeaIlh and EnvIronment81 seMoe6 DepaJtment (1113104) I ' Part 2 City of Centerville - Wellhead Protection Plan Appendix 1 Location of Probable Wells Page 1-3 Table Page 4 Map --.- - -------- ---- ------------------------- . ' Part 2 city of Centerville - Wellhead Protedion Plan Appendix 1 Location of Probable Wells Location PIN Address Yr. Wtr No. Bit. MaIn Yr 1 143122430059 1875 FOX RUN 1989 2 143122440029 7214 UNITY AVE 1990 NWM 3 143122440030 7222 UNITY AVE 1990 NWM 4 233122110002 1981 MAIN ST 1955 1990 5 233122110003 1979 MAIN ST 1980 1990 6 233122110004 1969 MAIN ST 1981 1990 7 233122110005 1976 MAIN ST 1958 1990 8 233122110006 1973 MAIN ST 1961 1990 9 233122110007 710520TH AVE N 1979 1990 10 233122110009 7137 20TH AVE N 1980 1990 11 233122110010 712920TH AVE N 1981 1990 12 233122110011 7163 ROBIN LN W 1987 NWM 13 233122110012 7169 ROBIN LN W 1987 NWM 14 233122110013 7175 ROBIN LN W 1987 NWM 15 233122110014 7181 ROBIN LN W 1987 NWM 16 233122110015 7187 ROBIN LN W 1988 NWM 17 233122110016 7193 ROBIN LN W 1985 NWM 18 233122110017 1960 ROBIN LN N 1984 NWM 19 233122110018 1966 ROBIN LN N 1985 NWM 20 233122110019 1972 ROBIN LN N 1985 NWM 21 233122110020 1978 ROBIN LN N 1985 NWM 22 233122110021 1984 ROBIN LN N 1987 NWM 23 233122110022 1988 ROBIN LN N 1988 NWM 24 233122110023 1994 ROBIN LN N 1987 NWM 25 233122110024 1994 CARDINAL DR 1989 1993 26 233122110025 1988 CARDINAL DR 1986 NWM 27 233122110026 1982 CARDINAL DR 1986 NWM 28 233122110027 1976 CARDINAL DR 1985 NWM 29 233122110028 1970 CARDINAL DR 1988 NWM 30 233122110029 1967 ROBIN LN N 1989 NWM 31 233122110030 1977 ROBIN LN N 1985 NWM 32 233122110031 1983 ROBIN LN N 1984 NWM 33 233122110032 1989 ROBIN LN N 1987 NWM 34 233122110033 1995 ROBIN LN N 1989 NWM 35 233122110034 1994 ROBIN LN S 1989 NWM 36 233122110035 1988 ROBIN LN S 1984 NWM 37 233122110036 1982 ROBIN LN S 1987 NWM .38 233122110037 1976 ROBIN LN S 1984 NWM 39 233122110038 1970 ROBIN LN S 1986 NWM Location PIN Address Yr. Wtr No. Bit MaIn Yr 40 233122110039 1967 CARDINAL DR 1988 NWM Page 1 4 I I . i.l......~* I -z~ b-;L1\ L.:r<, 'H-;e'!T;:' I f~~'~~,?f;~f"" .i' C, : i}~t~~~LLI j.~...~i;':'!,,-c" II ,I UNOLAKES ~:- I ;~fir~ Tl'>ll11 . . '", 'i"" [, . ..i "i;;~; ; ::=:JI.j ~{I"''' ~" .~"" ' " c ,,,-, o' NJI- I IU h'.' _ '.(. .i.,. 'k:'.' :.;:, ,,':':: ('f '1' ~~, ",,:,,' """" _L ...j ~,'I ' I . J ,'i"'" ..... i",: " I I- " " '.',h':i.'., F; ".i.>.i":' e-- _ __. 1'("'1-- ..... J.....:.: !(,,:,::.'.." I L---1?-:r r .. II '.. "," ':,;;::I':,I;,,,.'i"'"'' :"\i'.",," L!. / I il k ,.'C." ,,/" \'\ \:,",.\., ~ I' I _'I 1':,';Y'i'.'}.j'X"';:'//, \1 .....~'i.)'W,}', ,;::.,,1 .' ..,...;;,i \ i'.i" ..... .; '.. l- e- ~ I ' ..: ",'. .. c= -.- c . " ~"'''.! "" CJ - "",e" ~ ~Lt ~,.:- .'i.;-:, .....,...l!.' :Cffi.',.)Ji,ii }- :,=c.::'= 1- OJ.>!,' ~ i / / j , "\ 'B ~ ---1 ':"... '.~ " ~/.x .:i;:::,,J- \ ~ \'O~.L ^ '\ \ \ 1..", 'i ......, ,., .' \ 'i <2> B"-"rl"'I'1"r,' , ~,"'" ,- ~ E,i \ \.1 \1_ 'i " :' 'F'i",,'i ",)i':" I \ i1J ~,I ,"';V} ~"...'. 1"\'<' :"";' ~. I',.,. I GJ~Ti[-== ~~;;!:o;mq, 't4'''-' ,i' T""" Cj, "r';',,' I'.; 1?I!:ct':! ...... i \' lit;::., a:::L /'f~~ . '..' ;,:"": '" ," t-..,...'. Ii,. Ii I _~ IIIJ II \3 I ,_-, ~I-~ (.0.....:.",:,,;;. 'LV";' .. ~ I -.. PIdIabIo__ - Bt. ----+-G ~1<z . I '" L . ~-J I: ~~~C":"""';;::/;H<"1;" I 11\ DMafoIpaIIIl88 /J\ -1- H : I f1 '" j -l/ (I c"H,',,;.,,;. . a l I ' I r:: I"" III R LE I'" I I I -r I ' I ...d - . ~ , I Part 2 Wellhead Protection - Centerville Appendix 2 MDH Source Water Assessment SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT FOR CENTERVILLE* 10 Number: 1020036 Facility Contact: Todd Peterson. (651) 429-4750 City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 MOH Contact Art Persons, (507) 292-5138 18 Wood Lake Drive Southeast Rochester, MN 55904 artpersonS@health.state.mn.us status of the Source Water Protection Plan: The water supply system is preparing a protection plan for the wellhead protection area(s) that have been approved by the Minnesota Department of Health under provisions of Minnesota Rules Chapter 4720. Source Water Protection Area (SWPA) - Yes - A Source Water Protection Area has been designated for this well. Description of the source water - The water supply for Centerville is obtained from 2 primary well. Well depth (in feet), well status, aquifer(s) used. and sensitivity of the source(s) of drinking water are listed in the following table. ulfer Sensltlv High High Well construction assessment - - The water wells used by the Centerville meet current standards for construction and maintenance. These factors do not contribute to the susceptibility of the source water to contamination. Well Sensitivity - Well sensitivity refers to the integrity of the well due to its construction and maintenance. It is based on the results of the well construction assessment. It can be one of the following: (1) The well is susceptible to contamination because it does not meet current construction standards or no information about well construction is available, regardless of aquifer sensitivity. (2) The well is not susceptible because It meets well construction standards and does not present a pathway for contamination to readily enter the water supply. Aquifer Sensitivity - Aquifer sensitivity refers to the degree of geological protection afforded the aquifer(s) used by the public water supply. High - The aquifer is considered to exhibit a high sensitivity to contamination because of the local geological setting. Source Water Susceptibility - Source water susceptibility refers to the likelihood that a contaminant will reach the source of drinking water. It reflects the results of assessing well sensitivity, aquifer sensitivity, and water quality data. The source of drinking water is considered susceptible because one or more wells exhibit a high sensitivity. High - The source water is considered to be susceptible because of the tritium content of the well water in bedrock Contaminants of concern - The following statement summarizes the potential contaminants for which a source of drinking water may be at risk: . One or more contaminants regulated under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act for this public water supply system have been detected in the source water. However, the water supplied to users meets state and federal drinking water standards for potability. For further information, please contact the MDH representative listed at the beginning of this assessment. *Adapted from Minnesota Department of Health Source Water web page (7I3l2OO7) . ~ . ( Part 2 City of Centerville - Wellhead Protection Plan Appendix 3 City of Centerville 2006 Drinking Water Report (4 pages) t . , I'\\'SIll: \O~(}(}36 City of Ccntcrvillc 2006 Drinking Wal.:r R':pOrl Th.: Cily of C.:nl.:rvill\.' is issuing lh.: r.:sults of moniloring don.: on ilS drinking wul.:r for lh.: p.:riod from January I (() D.:c.:mocr 3 I, 2006. Th.: purpos.: of lhis r,:pOrl is 10 advanc.: consum.:rs' und.:rslunding of drinking wakr and hdghlm awar.:n.:ss oflh.: n.:.:d 10 prol\.'Cl pr.:cious wul.:r r,:sollfc,:s. SOllfC': of Wal.:r Th.: City of C.:nl.:rvilk provid.:s drinking wul.:r 10 ils r\.'sid.:nls IhH11 a grouIH.lwul.:r SOllfC\.': lwo wdls runging from 187 10 267 1'--':1 d\.'.:p llml draw ''Ial.:r n'om lh.: Prairi.: Du-Ch k'n-Jordun und Shakop\.-.: Formalion. Th.: wal.:r pf()vid.:d 10 cuslom.:rs may m.:d drinking wal.:r slandards bUllh.: Minn.:solu D.:parlm.:nl or I kulth hus d':l.:rmin.:d lhal on.: or more oflhe SOllfC':S or waler is pOlenliully susc.:plibk 10 conlmninalion. If you wish 10 obluinlhe .:nlire SOllfC': wuler assessmenl r.:garding your drinking waler, pkase call 651-201-4700 or I -800-8 I lPJ3 I 8 (and press 5). during normal busin\.'ss hours. Also, you cun vi.:w it on !in.: al Call Paul, T.:dd or AI al 651-429-4750 if you haw queslions aboullhe Cily ofCenlerville drinking wul\.'r or would Iik.: informal ion uboul oPPorlunities f()r public parlicipalion in (k'Cisions lhul may ullccl lh.: quality of lh.: wal.:r. R.:sults of Monitoring ;\0 conluminanls w.:r.: d.:l\.'Cled al kwls lhul violal.:d Icd.:ral drinking waler slundards. Ilow.:v.:r, some conlmninanls were d.:l':Cl.:d in lrace mnounls lhal w.:r.: oclow kgullimils. 111': labk lhal fhllows shows lh.: conlaminanls lhal were d.:l.:cled in lrace mnollnls lasl y.:ar. (Som.: conlmnimmls ar.: sampled kss fr\.'qu.:nlly lhan once a year; us u result, nol all conluminants w.:re sumpled fhr in 2006. I l' uny or lhes.: contumimmts \wre delect.:d th.: lust time they wer.: smnpkd fix, they ure includ.:d in lhe tubl.: along with lh.: dule lhul lh.: d.:l\.'Ction occurr.:d). K.:y to abbr.:v iUlions: MCl.(i---Muximum Contmnimmt Levd Goal: Th.: kvc\ of u conluminant in drinking wut.:r bdow which th.:re is no known or expected risk 10 heulth. MCLG s ullow n)r u margin of salety. MCL---Muximum Contuminanl Levd: The highest lewl of u conlul11immllhul is ullow\.'C.! in drinking wul.:r. MCLs ar.: sel us close to lhe MCLGs us Icusibk using th.: ocsl uvailabk tr,:ulm.:nll\.'c11l1ology. MRDL---Muxil11ul11 R.:sidual Disinlcclanl L\.'vel. MRDLG---Maximum R\.'sidllUI Disinlcctanl L.:wl Goal. AL---Aclion L.:wl: 111e concenlralion or a conlamimmt which, if ,:xCl.-.:ded, lriggers lreall11.:nl or other Page) of4 , l II I I'WSID: 1O~()()36 requirement which a water system mustl()lIow. 90th Percentile Level---111is is the value obtained aileI' disregarding 10 percent or the samples taken that had the highest levels. (For example. in a situation in which 10 smnples were taken. the 90th percentile k'vel is determined by disregarding the highest resull, which represents 10 percent or the samples.) ~ote: In situations in which only 5 samples arc taken, the average or the two with the highest levels is taken to determine the 90th percentile level. pCill---PicoCuries p\.'r liter (a measure orradioactivityo). ppb---Parls per billion, which can also be expressed as micrograms per liter (ugin. ppm---Parts per million, which can also be expr\.'ssed as milligrams per liter (mgiO. ~/A---~ot Applicable (docs not apply). Level Found :ontamimmt MCUi MCL Irypical Source or Contaminant units) Range A wrage (2006) IResull* Alpha Emitters ) 15.4 .'\/A 1.2 Erosion or natural deposits. pCiln 07/17/20020) Barium (ppm) , , ':\/A 0.03 Discharge or drilling wastes; 07/17/2002) Discharge from metal relineries: Erosion or natural deposits. :admium (ppbO) 5 5 ':\/A I.R5 :orrosion of gal\ooan ized pipes: 07/17/20020) Erosion or natural deposits: Discharge from metal relineries: RunolT rrom waste batteries and paints. :ombined Radium 0 5.4 I':\/A ~l. 09 Erosion or natural deposits. pCiln 07/17/2002) Fluoride (ppm ) ..to ~.O ).93- 1.1 1.03 State or Minnesota r\.'(.juircs all nunicipal water systems to add Iluoride to the drinking water to )romote strong teeth: Erosion or natural dCJ)osits: Disclmrge rrom ICrlilizer and aluminum Illctorks. Ilaloacetic ^cids k> 50 t\/^ 0.6 By-product or drinking water 11^^5) (DDb) disinl~'Ction. Page 201'4 ~--~--------- -~- --- - ----- ~ -------'----<--- - ---- 4 '- .J I" .evd I r.' ound :ontamimll1t MCUi MeL Typical Source or ContUln inant unitsi Range Average (2006i IResult* Mercury ., ., i:\/A ~1.02 ~rosion or natural deposits; Discharge inorganic') (ppbi. rrom relineries and 11lclories; Runorr 07/17/2002) rrom landlills; RunoJl' Irom cropland. t'\ it rate (as 10 10 .0,42-,45 0,45 RunoJl'lrom fertilizer use; Leaching ~itrogen) (ppm) Irom septic tanks, sewage; Erosion of natural deposits. IrTIIM (Total ) 80 ,fA 3.3 By-product of drinking water rihalomethanes i lisin fi:ction. (ppb) {07/18f2005i l'WSID: \()~1I11~6 Contaminant {unitsi Ll.'vd Found Ran!.'.e {2006i A veraudResuh* Tvnical Source orContatninant Radon (pCii1 i ':\/A 383 Erosion of natural deposits. {10i19/2005i *This is the value used to determine compliance with federal standards. II sometimes is the highest value detected and sometimes is an average of all the detected values. I fit is an average, it may contain sampling results 11"<)(11 the previous year. Radon is a radioactive gas which is naturally occurring in some groundwater. II poses a lung cancer risk when gas is rdeasl.'d Irom waleI' into air (as occurs during showering, bathing, or washing dishes or c10thesi and a stomach cancer risk when it is ingested. Because radon in indoor air poses a much greater health risk than radon in drinking water, an Alternative Maximum Contaminant Levd {AMCU or 4,000 picoCurics per liter may apply in states tlmt have adopted an Indoor Air Program, which compds citizens, homl.'owners, schools, and communities to reduce the radon threat Irom indoor air. For states without such a program, the Maximum ContUlnimll1t Levd (MCU of 300 pCi/1 may apply. Minnesota plans to adopt an Ind(x)r Air Program once the Radon Rule is Iinalized. ~ontam inant **** ***** Irypical Source or Contaminant units) VlRDLG MRDL :h lorine (ppm) 4 ,4-.7 59 Water additive used to control microbes. ****Ilighest and Lowest Monthly Avemge. *****Ilighest Quarterly Average. :ontaminant 90% #. sites Typical Source of Contaminant unitsi MCLG AI. Level over AI. :()pper (ppm) r\./A 1.3 .51 1 out 01'20 :orrosion or household plumbing systems; 06/15/2005') Erosion or natural <.Ic!}osits. Page 301'4 -- - ----------- - - ------ - - .. . '- .t , < I'WS1D: IO~O()~6 Som\: contaminants do not haw Maximum Contaminant L\:vds \:stablish\:d fhr th\:m. TIl\:S~ "unr~gulat~d contHluinants" ar~ ass~ss\:d using stat~ standards known as h\:alth risk limits to d~t~rmin~ ir th~y pos~ a lhr~at to hunHU1 h~alth. I I' unacc~ptabk levds or an unr\:gulat~d contaminant ar\: round, th\: r\:slxms\: is th~ sam~ as ir an MCL has b~'\:n \:xc~,\:<.j...'d; th~ wat~r syst~m must infhrm its custom\:rs and lHk\: oth~r COIT\:ctivc actions. In th~ tabl~ that fhllows ar\: th\: unr~gulat\:d cO\1tmuinants that \wr~ d~t~'Ct~d: -- L\:wl Found - k:ontamimmt (units) Rang~ A wrag~/R~sult Typical Sourc~ or Contamimmt (2006) Sodium (l')1)m) (07/17/2002) ~/A t3.R r.:rosion or natural d~l)osits. Sull~tt~ (I)I)IU) (07/1 7/20(2) ~/A R,2 r.:rosion or natural d~~)osits. Complianc~ with ~ational Primary Drinking Wat~r R~gulations Th\: sourc~s or drinking wat~r (both tap wat~r and bottled wat~r) includ~ riwrs, lak\:s, str~ams, Ixmds, r\:s~rvoirs, springs, and wdls. As wat~r trawls ov\:r th~ surl1tC~ orth~ land or through th~ ground, it dissolv~s naturally-occurring min~rals and, in som~ cas~s, radioactiv~ mat~rial, and can pick up substanc~s r~suhing rromth~ pr~s~nc\: or animals or rrom human activity. Contaminanls thalmay b~ pr~s~nt in sourc\: wat~r inclulk: !1-licmbitll ('fJllttllllimlllts, such as virus~s and bact~ria, which may com~ rrom ~wag\: tr~atm~nt plants, s\:ptic syst\:ms, agriculturalliv\:stock OI1\:ratio\1s, and wildlill:. I1wrgtlllic CfJlltlllllilltlllt!i, such as salts and m~tals, which can oc naturally-occurring or r~sult rrom urban stormwat\:r fllnon: industrial or dom~stic wast~wat\:r discharg~s, oil and gas production, mining, or I1trluing. Pesticitles tllltll,erbidtle!l', which may com~ rrom a variety or sourc~s such as agricultur~, urban stormwal\:r runon: and r~sid~ntialus~s. Orgm,ic cI,elllictll cmlttllllillull1s, including synth~t ic and volatil~ organic ch~micals, which ar~ by- products or industrial proc~ss~s and l1\:trokum production, and can also com\: rrom gas stations, urban stormwat\:r runon: and s\:ptic syst~ms. Rtltli(}{tc.'1i\'e cm,tmllilltlllt.\', which can oc naturally-occurring or b~ th\: n.'sult or oil ~U1d gas production and mining act ivities, In ord~r to ~nsllr~ that tap wat~r is sail: to drink, th~ l:. S. Environm\:ntal Prot~ction Ag~ncy (EPA) pr~scriocs r~glllations which Iimitth~ amount or c~rtain contaminants in wat~r provkkd by public wat\:r syst~ms. Food and Drug Administration r~glllations ~stablish limits ror contaminants in boukd wat~r which must provid~ th~ sam~ prot~'Ction ror public h~alth. Drinking wat\:r, including boukd wat~r, may r~asonably oc \:xp~'Ct~d to contain at kast smull amounts or som~ contHluinants. Th\: pr~~nc~ or contamimll1ts do\:s not n~c~ssarily indicah.' that wat~r IX)~S a h~ahh risk. Mor~ inrormation about contamimmts and p()t~ntial h~alth dll:cts can oc obtain~d by citlling th\: Envirol1lucnlal Prol~cli()n Ag~ncy's Sail: Drinking Wat~r lIotlin~ at 1-800-~26-~791. Some! jleople may I'll! more! 1.,t/llertlMe! to ('Ol/lamillell/(,\' ill elrillki1lg II'C/(l!r 11"/1( IlIe gelte!ral populalioll, Im/llttllO- ('ompromiseelper,\'()I/.\' su('1I a.\' per,w)l/.~ l1'UII ('e/l((,l!r ttI"lergoillg dlemolllertlpy, l'II!r,wm.\' 11'110 lIal'e! ullelergO/II! or gait Irc/l(splal/l,~, l'II!ople Irilll H/lZ:JIDS or Ollre!r immUlIe! ,~y.\'lem eli,~orele/'!l, .\'OIl/e l!!ele!r(l', allel i/~till/I.\' ('all Ill! parlicular(l' al ri.\'kfrom iI~ti!Cli01l.\'. Tlle,~e! l'II!ople .\'I/(mlel,~e!e!k CIC!1-i('e ahotll elrillkillg It'ale!r.frc>J1/ IlIeir lIe!allll care! pr()l'iele~'. EI'AiCDC guielelille.\' OIl approprielle II/e!e/l(,\' to les.\'e!1I Ihe ri,\'k (~f'i/~tecliOlI.\' hy ('r,11'to'\1lCWieliulII are! ell'ai/aMe .fi'cml Ihe! Selle Drillkillg Wale!r HOlli1le al 1-8(J(J-.J:!()".J,79 I. Page 4 0 r 4 - ----------"---- L.N. Sodding, LLC Speclall2Jng In BIG ROLL SOD Installdon Seeding, Lawn Repairs, Grading LANCE NOREN President 6198 Holly Drive Uno Lakes, MN 55038 (661) 481-9269 Fax (651) 481-0128 // SOD IS PERISHABLE WsIBr InlmsdJateIy Alter BeIng Lsldl .. Customer CITY OF C~NTRRVTI,T.E (PAm.) LA~IE LAMOTTE PARK 6936 LAMOTTE DRIVE Date l\.TT~m:l'T' 1"l ?nn7 CENTERVILLE PROPOSAL FORM We are pleased to submit the, following quotation for your consideration: SPM'flNG I:OJtpS BLAeK DIM S6REENEB & PYL\"ERli!!ED FINE GRADING & FERTILIZING OLD SOD COT OFF, REMOVED EDGES COT NEW SOD LAID & RoLLED OR ACTUAL AMOUNT USED @ $ 1053 00 BJA.'IINQ. SALES TAX INCLUDED TOTAL It , n"~ nn CUSTOMER AGREES TO REMOVE SILT FENCE OR THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE OF Terms: C.O.D. CUSTOMER AGREES TO ACCEPT RESPONSIB OR ANY DAMAGE Authorized 81 re SOD IS PERISHABLE Customer asswnee aU responslbllIlfes after sod or eeed Is lnstaUed including watering. Water sod Immedlately after being lnslaUed. NOWARRANTY/GUARANTEE IMPUED DUETO SHADE PROBLEM IN THE CASE WE ARE A OR STEEP S?L THAT MAY WASH. OUT. DEEMED CONTRACTOR: _ CONTRACTORS NOTICETO OWNER CusIomeI'e SIgnature ~ (A) Any Person or Company supplying labor or materials for this Improvement to your property may file a lien against your property If that Person or COmpany Is not paid for the contributions. (8) Under Minnesota law you have the right to pay Persons who supplied labor or materials for this Improvement directly and deduct this amount from our contract price, or wIthhold the amounts due them from us until 120 days after completion of the Improvements unless we give you a lien waiver signed by Persons who supplied any labor or material for the Improvement and who gave' you timely notlc8. . The above prices, speclflcatlonsand conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. ThIs proposal Is a legal binding contract when signed by customer. In the event customer cancels co~ after It.has been accepted, customer agrees to pay 20"'{' of the total contract amount to LN. Sodding. No except/ons. Customer agrees to pay all amounts due under this contract upon receipt of an Invoice. If Invoice Is not paid In full wIthin 10 days customer agrees to pay Interest at 1.5% monthly and agrees to pay all reasonable cost of collection, Including attorney feeS Incurred In collecting this account arising from this proposal. Accepted by customer :k' LN.Soddlng,LLC iJ(jiJ ~ -xfM~ Date ;/L " :AJ~)('a:h dt.q' ,:: H~'usel In,C. ' . Please cont&ctOutCoD:ununityEdl.lCationC~rdinator,:ZebHenderson. . "d ' $Jfre~~at(16~)7$O-~332 ifyo~havcranyqOOStions ,tegarding~~~:;" ,\ ;;"_!?M~:;~,!O;~~'~~~~.'~,:.<'y':; '. " '," ",c," .' , Wl)r(tl1t~fofm' · ,. S'mcereW' ' " , ~............. ~M~.!Y;~: ..... . ' . \Lc:I~rteWolfe ',., '. , Execlitive.DkeCtOr' .' [ !' P.O. Box 49039 Blclin!il, MN '55449 Phonez 763.780.2332 CrIsis/Try: ? 63.7at:T.2~30. . ";Fa~: 763.780.9696 ' , ~.~lexCllndrahou&tt.org r,: JIoatdof Di.....rs . .vlcldR~e, ChaIr ,\ <; Terri Neely TlnklEmberg, '.' . i - " - - VIce Chair DIane Fischer, . . Treasurer ConnIe Nelson, Secretary CIndy Arndt Kirsten GorsuCh Rev. Dr. Margaret Guelker Don llse , 'D~e;S~lIman',' I. " ..Corini~M~otei . . EX~v!il-P1r'~()I': ' .' !~ " '. .. Eitdhl~r domestiC' ~oler)c:e: for. ,'~on,e,lt,famni~s: (jnd cQmrillmiti~$~ ' " -' ,- '" - (.. ~ , , . -,~ - < -- : ' ,'-. - ,-, ',' ' . ' " ,. August 13? 2007,. '. , Mayor'M~eapra. . City.of Centervllle: ' 1880 Maks~ ','" " CenterviUe,MN 5Sp38 DeatMayorCapra: As you know, October is Domestic VioleJlce ~wareness Month; . 'fhis year, . Alexahdra Houseis celebratin,g thirty years ofserv;.cetovictizris, survivOrs" :andourcommUnity.~tb.esethirtYyears, we hav~ .~. SUppot1edcand. . ' enCo~gedbythC:CQmmitment from the cities, municipalities, and Anoka Co~ty. ,. , . , , . ,'Alexandra House, Inc. wouIdbe honored if you would sponsor an official proclamation recogrilziligOetober 'as Domestic Viol(mce Awareness Month.'Yourproclaniationwouldofflcially recogniZe both the gravity of the. ' problem and t4e importance. of the ongoing wotktocreate a violence;-free Community inAnoka County, YourptoclamationwouId ilIso emphasize the . CitY qfCentervi11e~s effortS to end 90mestic violence. I have ehclosed a sample you may wish to use to compose your proClamation. We,will display all proclaniations atom: annual.. Walkfor llope:Steps to End Domestic Violence on Saturday, October (; at Bunker HillsRegio~ Parkin Andover. ~Wehopethat this event will raise awareness of dOmestic violence ~d 1?ring more of our community tog~er in public opposition to domestic violence. We will also honor those who have lost their'lives to domestic violence, 'th9se who have survived and those. who continue their s1:tuggle. AftertheWalkjor Hope is cOmplete<i,we will display the proclamations at Alenndra House.' . . " j-' . '....' '...~.l./. ......2........ ,.,'~ ~' ' . --' - -"::-<" ~- ". ' - ~ ~. ~ ,'- ~-~-~.....-.- ,WHE~AS~.dom~tiq~ole1lCe,is_~' cmn:e,tf1~^ oot,~\'~~~$si,On()f~bicbwilltl()t'~ "'. ..', I . - , ; . -~ ""," I -' : " " ~, " J _' . .' _,': _ ._ .,' '. .' _ '. ' . '_ _ ' J,. .wl~inAn9ka County',8Il~ perpetratorS qf Baid.~ate$Ubject topr~~tjori $4 :C01ivicti~iLin~accorda;nceWitl1tliel~\V;$id, . .,.; ,,' i,,",,", ,...,.," ":" ': . ','.,.. ,.,.. '.'.' , ,I. . , I 'WHEiEAS,'~yerth~QridsofWOn1~~dchild{~' haveandwi1icontinu~~ 'aCceS~ '. .-. ,:. ".":,) . :' ." " -,', ' r ' assistance from A1exan~ijo\lSe, Inc.:, a domestic 'vi~len~s.endcepro~der; and, . (,' " " . . ' ., " WFlF;RE~$,"~~estic,viOleti~'~l beefur1in~red tbrOUghcOinmuDity p~bipS~f ,concerned indjvi(l'g~$.and organ17.ations workin:g~togetherto j>revCfIltabusewhileat tb.e . 'samtffune effecting social and legal Change; and' WHElffiAS~ ckt~beris'Ntitio;'tdDo'm'estic Jrmlence A~arene~ M~hth';,~ . - - ' ~' ' " '. . .' - , ': - '. ~ './ - - .. , ' . ," ' W HEIlliAS, dunn. .,g IVationrlt Dotnestic'VlOle~Ce iwarenes, sMonth~ Anob Coun.ty 'o~tiohs wn.(~qnnarea ,r#idents abput domestic violenee,its prevaI~ce, .... ,',' " "cons~uences~dw~a~;w~,:as ~cOn~ed ~~tY.~ dQ to eliminate jtS'e*istei:lCe~, ".'j' . , ., TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN For TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NUMBER 1-7 Kendall Howard Project (Economic Development District) of the CITY OF CENTERVILLE SEPTEMBER 26, 2007 Prepared by: John Meyer . Finance Director City of Centerville -15 ---- - - -~---- ---- - -------~ ~II' . lOll] 3' d J '" H V . , . . 1111 Q ~ < ~ o I ==J ::IE ~f ~ s <S Q Z r:1 ~ f i! ~ z ,;j&, TABLE OF CONTENTS SEcnON I TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NUMBER 1-7 (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT) Subsection 2.1. Statement of Objectives Subsection 2.2. Development Program Subsection 2.3. Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing Disbict No. 1-7 Subsection 2.5. Development Activity in Development Project No. 1-7 for which Contracts have been Signed Subsection 2.6. Other Specific Development Expected to Occur within Development Disbict No. 1-7 Subsection 2.7. Estimated Cost of Project Subsection 2.8. EstImated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness Subsection 2.9. Sources of Revenue Subsection 2.10. Estimated Original and Captured Tax Capacities Subsection 2.11. Type of Tax Increment Financing Dlsbict Subsection 2.12. Duration of Tax Inaement Financing Dlsbict No. 1-7 Subsection 2.13. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing JUrisdictions Subsection 2.14. Studies and Analysis Used for "But For" Determination Subsection 2.15. Modification of Tax Increment Financing Disbict No. 1-7 and/or Tax Increment Financing Plan. Subsection 2.16. Prior Planned Improvements Subsection 2.17 Fiscal Disparities Election 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 5 5 5 5 EXHIBIT 1 Boundary Map and Legal Descriptions of Tax Increment Financing Dlsbict No. 1-7, as established Cash Flow Analysis EXHIBIT 2 EXHIBIT 3 Public Notice EXHIBIT 4 Proposed Development - Kendall Howard (Phase One) - Table of Contents - .1/1 ---- -- -- --------- -- --- SECTION I. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PlAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NUMBER 1-7 Subsection 2. 1. Statement of Obiectives. llF District 1-7 is being created to facilitate development of a 50,000 square foot industrial building on a parcel east of Royal Oaks Industrial Park. See SectIon I, Development Program for Development District No.1, Subsection B, Statement of Objectives. Subsection 2.2. Develooment Proaram. See SectIon I, Development Program. Subsection 2.3. Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financlna District No. 1-7. The following parcels are located In the City of Centerville, COunty of Anoka, State of Minnesota: A portion of parcel number - 24-31-22-33-0017 (approximately 3.5 acres) (See EXHIBIT 1 for the map of Tax Increment financing District No. 1-7) Subsection 2.4. Parcels in Acaulsitlon. The City will not be acquiring all parcels with this development project. Subsection 2.5. Develooment District Activities in Develooment District No. 1 for which Contracts have been Sianed. The following contracts have been entered Into by the City and the persons named below: Subsection 2.6. Other Soedfic Develooment ExDected to Occur within Develooment District No.1. 50,000 square foot Industrial development (See EXHIBIT 4) -Page1- ~ - - - -- --- - - - --------- Subsection 2.7. Estimated Cost of Proiect. The estimated costs of public improvements to be made within Tax Increment Rnandng District No. 1-7 are to be financed by tax increments and other sources if necessary. These estimated costs are as follows: TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRIcr NUMBER. 1-7 Activity Estimated COst Developer Assistance (pay-as-you-go) Site Improvements Road Improvements Engineering/COntingencies Capitalized Interest Administrative Expenses Total Project-Wide Improvements $225,000 o o o o $ 30.000 $255,000 No public improvements will be made outside Tax Increment Rnandng District No. 1-7. SUPPORTIVE DATA FOR ESTlMATED COSTS OF IMPROVEMENTS II:e1 BASIS FOR ESTIMATES GRADING AND SITE PREPARATION EstImates by City staff, consultants and developer PUBliC IMPROVEMENTS/UTIUTIES EstImates by City staff, consultants and developer FIRE WATER/PONDS/liNES/PUMPS EstImates by City staff, consultants and developer ROAD IMPROVEMENTS Estimates by CIty staff, consultants and developer ADMINISTRATION Approximately 10% of tax Increment expenditures allowed for local . administration including bond Issuance costs and planning Subsection 2.8. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness. The CIty is anticipating the Issuance of .$Q In General Obligation Taxable Tax Increment Bonds relating to this project. The Oty does antldpateenterlng Into a revenue note with developer for $225,000. - Page 2 - 49 -- -- - -- --------- - ~--- - -------- Subsection 2.9. Sources of Revenue. Public Improvement costs, acquisition, site preparation costs and other costs outlined In the EstImated Cost of Project (Subsection 2.7 above) will be financed through the annual collection of tax Increment revenues as described below and such other permissible revenue sources as determined by the CIty Including Bonds referenced in Subsection 2.8. The CIty expects to retain 100 percent of the tax Increment for payment of the CIty's obligations. Subsection 2.10. Estimated Oriainal and CaDtured Tax Caoacities. The most recent original tax capacity of Tax Increment Rnanclng DIstrict No. 1-7 Is estimated to be $1,564. The estimated captured tax capacity of Tax Increment Rnanclng District No. 1-7 at the time the tax increment becomes payable is expected to be $35.582. Subsection 2.11. TvDe of Tax Increment FinancinG District. Tax Increment Financing DIstrict No. 1-7 Is, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.174, Subd. 12, a "Economic Development DIstrict" defined as type of tax Increment financing district consisting of a project, or portions of a project, within which the authority finds to be In the public Interest because: (1) It will discourage commerce, Industry, or manufacturing from movfng their operations to another state or municipality; or (2) It will result In Increased employment In the state; or (3) It will result In preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the state. Subsection 2.12. Duration of Tax Increment Flnancina District No. 1-7. The duration of Tax Increment Rnanclng DIstrict No. 1-7 Is expected to be eight (8) years from the receipt of the first tax Increment. The date of receipt of the first tax Increment Is anticipated In the year 2009. Thus, It Is estimated that the Tax Increment Financing District, IncludIng any modifications for subsequent phases or other changes would terminate in the year 2016. -Page3- 5?J -- ---- - ----------------------------- - -- Subsection 2.13. Estimated ImDact on Other TaxinG Jurisdictions. Test No.1: The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes construction would have occurred without the creation of a Tax Increment Rnandng District. If the construction Is a result of tax Increment financing, the impact is $0 to other entities. Test No.2: Notwithstanding the fact that the fiscal Impact on the other taxing jurisdictions Is $0 due to the fact that the financing would not have occurred without the assistance of the City, the following estimated Impact of the Tax Increment Rnandng District would be as follows if Test No.1, the "but for" test was not met: IMPACT OF TAX BASE %of Captured Current Original Future Captured Tax . Tax Tax Tax Tax Capacity to Entity Capacity Capadty Capacity Capacity Entity City 3,565,966 1,564 37,146 35,582 1.00% County 296,151,005 1,564 37,146 35,582 0.01% ISO 12 26,341,846 1,564 37,146 35,582 0.14% IMPACT ON TAX CAPACITY RATES Current Captured Tax Tax Potential Rate Entity Rate Capacity Taxes Impact City 50.486% 35,582 $17,964 0.50% County 30.322% 35,582 $10,789 0.00% ISO 12 40.187% 35,582 $14,299 0.05% Total 120.995% 35,582 $43,052 0.56% -Page4- 51 ~~--~-------- I I 0 I Subsection 2.14. studies and Analvses Used for DBut ForD Determination. The following studies and analyses have been undertaken and reviewed in order to make the "but for" findings provided for in the approving resolution of the City, as required pursuant to SectIon 469.1n, Subd. 3, clause 2 of the Tax Increment Financing Act: Such studies and analyses are on file In the office of the Finance Director. Subsection 2.15. Modification of Tax Inaement Flnandna DIstrict No. 1-7 and lor Tax Inaement Flnandna Plan. As of September 26.2007. no modifications to Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-7 or the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefore have been made. Subsection 2.16 Prior Planned ImDrovements. In the 18 months prior to the city's public hearing to consider approving the Tax IncremeOnt Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District 1-7, no building permits have been issued on parcels Included in the proposed Tax Increment Financing DIstrict. Subsection 2. 17. Fiscal DlsDarltles Election. The city elects to calculate fiscal disparities pursuant to Minnesota Statutes SectIon 469.1n, Subd. 3, clause b. -PageS- ~t- ---------- --- - -------~ - EXHIBIT 1 Boundary Map of Tax Increment Flnandng District No. 1-7, as established SeDtember 26. 2007 Tax Increment Flnandng DIstrict No. 1-7 MaD-TIFDistrict 1-' . ~3 EXHIBIT 2 Cash Flow Analvsis 2!lOZ 2QW ~ 2Q1Q 20U ZQU WJ. ~ illS ~ 1.. Z 3 1 .s. ~ z .!!. 2 .lll Bealnnlno Balance $0 $0 $0 $6,499 $13,422 $20,592 $28,120 $36,025 $44,325 $53,040 Inm!Im 1IF Tax Payments $0 $0 $42,699 $42,699 $42,699 $42,699 $42,699 $42,699 $42,699 $42,699 Interest Income $0 $0 $0 $325 $671 $1,030 $1,406 $1,801 $2,216 $2,652 Total Income $0 $0 $42,699 $43,024 $43,370 $43,728 $44,105 $44,500 $44,915 $45,351 ~ Prlndpal $0 $0 $22.700 $24.000 $25.500 $27.000 $28.700 $30,400 $32,200 $34,500 SUbtotal-Prfndpal $0 $0 $22,700 $24,000 $25,500 $27,000 $28,700 $30,400 $32,200 $34,500 Interest $0 $0 $13.500 $12,100 $10.700 $9.200 $7.500 $5.800 $4.000 $2.000 SUbtotal-Interest $0 $0 $13,500 $12,100 $10,700 $9,200 $7,500 $5,800 $4,000 $2,000 Total Expenses $0 $0 $36,200 $36,100 $36,200 $36,200 $36,200 $36,200 $36,200 $36,500 Net Difference $0 $0 $6,499 $6,924 $7,170 $7,528 $7,905 $8,300 $8,715 $8,851 Endlno Cash Balance $0 $0 $6,499 $13,422 $20,592 $28,120 $36,025 $44,325 $53,040 $61,891 PAYG Prlndoal $225,000 $225,000 $202,300 $178,300 $152,800 $125,800 $97,100 $66,700 $34,500 $0 .6~ EXHIBIT 3 Public Notice erviffe $.~ti 11157 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNlY OF ANOKA crrv OF CENTERVILLE NonCE OF PUBUC HEARING ON TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 1-7 PlAN IN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #1 NonCE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the CIty of CentelVlIJe, Minnesota will meet on Wednesday, September 26, 2007 In the Coundl Chambers of Centervllle CIty HaJJ located at 1880 Main Street, Centervllle, Minnesota commencing at 6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider .spendlng $255,000 for activities associated with a tax Increment district. The legal description of the district Is as follows: A Portion of THE SW1/4 OF SW1/4 OF SEC 24 1WP 31 RGE 22, EX THAT PRT OF S 342.75 FT OF SO 1/4 1/4 LYG WLY OF E 410 FTTHEREOF, ALSO EX E 410 FT OF S 345 FTTHEREOF, ALSO EX PRT PLA1TED AS ROYAL INDUSTRIAL PARK,EX RO, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC, CENTERVILLE, ANOKA COUNTY MINNESOTA. MaD-nF Dlsbict 1-7 II 55' The CIty Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assisted devices or a sign language Interpreter must be received before 4:00 p.m. September 17, 2007. All persons Interested are Invited to attend and to be heard, verbally or In writing. You may call City Hall at (651) 429-3232 If you have any questions. You may contact the City Clerk's office at (651) 429-3232 or by facsimile (651) 429-8629 If you need additional Information or to obtain a copy of the proposed tax Increment flnandng plan. If you desire, you mayemail: dlarson(lilcentervlllemn.com or imever(lilcentervillemn.com with questions or concerns. This notice Is also available on the City's web site: www.centervillemn.com. Teresa Bender/CIty Clerk, MCMC Published in the Quad Community Press on August 29,2007. SIP August 23, 2007 Dr. Roger Warner, Superintendent ISD#12 District Office 4707 North Road Circle Pines, MN 55014 Dear Dr. Warner: The City of Centerville is proposing to create a plan for Tax Increment DIstrict Number 1-7. Tax Increment District Number 1-7 is a redevelopment district located In Development District Number 1. Tax Increment District Number 1-7 involves expenditures totaling approximately $255,000.00 for site Improvements and administrative activities (administrative expenses do not exceed 10% of the project cost). The city will need to borrow for all the expenditures anticipated in the plan. The proposed development would not be possible if this tax increment financing plan were not implemented. No county road Improvements are needed to support this plan. The anticipated tax capacity capture from proposed activities Included in this plan within the proposed tax increment district is 35,582 at completion. To solicit public input and complete the plan adoption process, the city will be holding a public hearing on September 26, 2007 at 6:30 PM at city hall to receive comments on the plan. If you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to contact me at 651-429-3232. Sincerely, JoVlII\, W. Metler John W. Meyer City of Centerville Finance Director PS: Attached is a copy of the Tax Increment Financing Plan 51 ---------~~-----------~--~- August 23, 2007 Ms. Rhonda Sivarajah, Commissioner Anoka County 2100 3rd Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 Dear Commissioner Sivarajah: The City of CentervilJe Is proposing to create a plan for Tax Increment District Number 1-7. Tax Increment District Number 1-7 Is a redevelopment district located In Development District Number 1. Tax Increment District Number 1-7 Involves expenditures totaling approximately $255,000.00 for site Improvements and administrative activities (administrative expenses do not exceed 10% of the project cost). The city will need to borrow for all the expenditures anticipated in the plan. The proposed development would not be possible If this tax increment financing plan were not Implemented. No county road improvements are needed to support this plan. The anticipated tax capacity capture from proposed activities Included in this plan within the proposed tax increment district is 35,582 at completion. To solicit public input and complete the plan adoption process, the city will be holding a public hearing on September 26, 2007 at 6:30 PM at city hall to receive comments on the plan. If you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to contact me at 651-429-3232. Sincerely, JOVtV\, W. Me!jel' John W. Meyer City of Centerville Finance Director PS: Attached Is a copy of the Tax Increment Financing Plan August23,2007 Mr. Terry Johnson, County Administrator Anoka County 2100 3rd Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 Dear Mr. Mclinden: The City of Centerville is proposing to create a plan for Tax Increment District Number 1-7. Tax "Increment District Number 1-7 is a redevelopment district located in Development District Number 1. Tax Increment District Number 1-7 involves expenditures totaling approximately $255,000.00 for site Improvements and administrative activities (administrative expenses do not exceed 10% of the project cost). The city will need to borrow for all the expenditures anticipated In the plan. The proposed development would not be possible if this tax increment financing plan were not implemented. No county road improvements are needed to support this plan. The anticipated tax capacity capture from proposed activities included in this plan within the proposed tax increment district is 35,582 at completion. To solicit public Input and complete the plan adoption process, the city will be holding a public hearing on September 26, 2007 at 6:30 PM at city hall to receive comments on the plan. If you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to contact me at 651-429-3232. Sincerely, JoVlV\, w. Metjer John W. Meyer City of Centerville Finance Director PS: Attached is a copy of the Tax Increment Financing Plan --~ ------------------------------~-- _____ _n_ EXHIBIT 4 Proposed Development - Kendall Howard (Phase One) -- ----~- -- ------- -----~--- I- LIJ LIJ I ~ z I V1 ~ r == 5 'I ~ E II > ~ 1 ~ I ~ I I , I lI~OS8UUJW '8mA.l9~U8:J O~V MOH llVON3)1 BUIPUng pasodoJd iJm ; HI ~ II :dI ~ J JU1U.... J ~II OO~ .._..~.~OON ..." , , ........ ........ 1~~ l'll!! iO _ J J J J J J Ii J , . I .. I)' : J I I .:11111111 IIIII111 IJJI........L.h-1SJ..-dl<ID~...~JIIIJIJ J: , J I I I III I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1'-1-''''' T-:-' I 1-1- T I I J I I I I I I I ~L.....J...'J"""'" ...L....L....11-L..~..J........1--L......LI.,..1 , , , .1 I I ." ~ ' , , J I" 'i' J :: .. 8 J : i L__ .-------lflf---" i-------------- ---------------__j l.!:::.... --------~----~I~--- ------ .-------------_________________ ~ "-" n" . ..~.-"-"-..-.. ~ !H 3.llO.8\:.OON pll Iii i IiI I D~~ 8 'r III ~~ ~' :!i liii ; ~i . ,.... g <~ J 10 ~I IV 1l.~1~~'IMIIJI ......" ~ e~ S ~lli ~I~ 1ll01l8UU)W 'amA.l8~UlI::> O'MV MOH llVON3)1 8uIPUn9 pasodoJd ii~ltl ~ Ni ud:'11 ~ J <( ~ III I u ! l ~ I ~ ~ ~ I r----1l I 1 I i -P-'" 1 ~ -P-/lt f -P-/lt l-P-- ~.. i r: @l -P-/lt JJ-$t 1 1 1= "~,--- ~~ :1ili1 ~s'll i'l i -III Ulli!~,. ill; I oJ: ~il IHllu . ~ Mdt WlOIl8UUJW 'SfDAJ8lUS:> allv MOH l1VaN3)1 8UIPU"9 pasodoJd IMI ~~~~ III II <! IU li~ Ui1t 1 J "" t t "- /IJJ .1S11l[ I:: II . II II .. . . . II II II II II II .. II II II n~..i1MllD ........ ~3 l- I IJJ IJJ I 0::: \ l- V) ~ I IJJ I > 0::: I < I I.L. --~.... I I I 8l0SClUUIW 'lIDJA.18lUa::> O}JV MOH llVON3)1 8uJPUng pasodoJd .!1:HI~~ III ~ I :d II~J~ln ! t ;= I I , . . , L" _" _" _., _.. _.. _.. _ '. _'. _..--.J OO'OllI> 3.,lIO,8&OON il! ~d l~ ~Ii i!! ~ idl~ Iii! I'i~ B; I=i~ "g'IllH g I IB~ ~ a ii II; illi ~ ~ 'r ~ ~ ~ ~ I I i I 13 I:I! I a ~ ~1. t! .. " II . II III " J !h!h ..J I II H! ~ .ilIIIII' Cl 181slll1 p~ z I ~! ij ! IIIUml j~; ~ I~C ~"" ...J ! 58 IiHlIlill18l1ii1 e I'" .. .t ~uaI!I ---sI ;;1 Member introduced the following resolution and moved Its adoption: CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CALL1NG FOR A PUBL1C HEARING ON THE ADOPTION OF A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-7 WHEREAS, on September 23, 1987 the dty of Centerville (City) established a city development district (Development District No.1) pursuant Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 through 469.134, to promote development and redevelopment within an area of the City which had not been developed to Its full potential; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to create tax Increment flnandng plan (Plan) for TIF DIstrict No. 1;.7 pursuant Minn~ota Statutes. SectIons 469.174 through 469.179, as amended, to encourage the redevelopment of a certain designated area In the city and authorize the expenditure of tax increment for certain public Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the City Coundl of the CIty of Centerville, Minnesota as follows: 1 The Rnance Director is authorized and directed to prepare the Plan forTIF District No. 1-7. 2 . The city coundl shall hold a public hearing on the Plan on September 26, 2007, starting at 6:30 p. m. in the coundl chambers at city hall. 3 The Finance Director Is authorized and directed to prepare a notice of the public hearing and cause the notice to be published In the official newspaper at least 10 days prior to the public hearing. 4 The Rnance Director Is authorized and directed to transmit a copy of the Plan to the county and school district with a notice of the time and place of the public hearing to be held before the city council. 5 The Finance Director is authorized and directed to take any and all other steps reasonably necessary in order to accomplish these purposes. Dated: August 22. 2007. Mary Capra, Mayor ATTEST: Teresa Bender, CIty derk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted In favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. ~5' - ------- --- ----~----~~~------------------ --~