The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2007-09-12 CC Packet teroi[[e 'Esrabfis!td 1857 CITY COUNCIL & WORK SESSION MEETING AGENDA COUNCIL MEETING Wednesday, September 12,2007 6:30 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call n. PUBLIC BEARINGS ID. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES 1. August 22, 2007 City Council Meeting Minutes (pages 1-8) v. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City of Centerville August 23, 2007 through September 12, 2007 Oaims (page 9) 2. Centennial Fire District Claims Through September 5, 2007 (page 10) 3. Gustafson Excavating, Ine. Pay Request #2 - Fairview Street Improvements - $51,108.74 (pages 11-14) 4. Gustafson Excavating, Inc. Change Order #1 - Fairview Street Improvements - $4,720.00 (pages 15-16) 5. Burschville Construction, Inc. Pay Request #6 - 20th Avenue Backage Road - $111,989.41 (pages 17-22) 6. Veit & Company, Inc. Pay Request #3 - Bidden Spring Park Improvements - $50,199.04 (Pages 23-27) 7. Precision Excavating & Grading, LLC Pay Request #1 - Old Mill Road Utility & Street Improvements - $47,933.20 (pages 28-31) 8. Minnesota Municipal Utilities Assoc. (MMUA), Safety Management Program - Amendment to Services Agreement - $5,900.00 (Pages 32-34) 9. Encroachment Agreement (FencelRear & Sides) - Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Nelson, 7191 Brian Drive (pages 35-41) 10. Encroachment Agreement (FencelRear & Sides) - Mr. & Mrs. Charles Reinhard, 1723 Meadow Lane (pages 42-46) 11. Parks & Recreation Committee Recommendation to Purchase a Sign Recognizing Mr. Trevor Weigel's Eagle ProjectlLaurie LaMotte Memorial Park (Flower Bed-Park Signage) (page 47) VI. A W ARDSIPRESENTATIONS/APPEARANCES vn. OLD BUSINESS 1. Anoka County Economic Development Authority a. Res. #07-XXX - Electing to Participate in the Anoka County Housing & Redevelopment Authority (pages 48-49) VIII. NEW BUSINESS 1. 2008 Preliminary General Fund Budget (September 12, 2007) (pages 50-68 ) a. Res. #07-XXX - Approving Proposed 2008 Budget & Tax Levy (Page 69) 2. Planning & Zoning Commission Findings & Recommendation for Conditional Use Permit (Bennett & Koch Construction, LLClWiII Lessard) - 6995 - 20th Avenue South (Construction Business Operation in B-1 (Commercial Zoning District) (pages 70-72) 3. City of Minneapolis, Office of the Mayor R. T. Rybek Requesting Support of Principles Regarding Construction of a New I-35W Bridge (Pages 73-76) a. Res. #07-XXX - Support of Minneapolis' Principles for Re- Constructing I-35W Bridge (page 77) 4. Environmental Assessment Worksheet - Downtown Centerville Redevelopment IX. ANNOUNCEMENTSIUPDATES 1. City Administrator, Mr. Dallas Larson X. ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING I. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call ll. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION 1. 2009 Street & Utility Improvement Project (Feasibility Study) m. ADJOURNMENT **REMINDERS** Planning & Zoning Commission- October 2,2007,6:30 p_m Council Chambers Parks & Recreation Committee ~ October 3,2007,6:30 p.m Council Chambers Council Meeting - September 26,2007, 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers Planning & Zoning Commission/Council Joint Meeting - October 2, 2007, 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers - Comprehensive Plan CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING & WORK SESSION August 22, 2007 6:30 p.m. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on August 22,2007, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Mayor Mary Capra Councilmember Tom Lee (arrived at 7:37 p.m.) Council Member Linda Broussard Council Member Michelle Lakso Council Member Jeff Paar A P.. f.... u..o..'.. t.... ."~':!' p"O.':':O." if.':..""'i::,,. N. :> .,. /" .: ':,'::T H,: ': ..... ',........,:.....:......:.......0............. ............... !::i,,,.,: :iQ.! :!". ,"""!"" .." ...... ........ ... STAFF: City Administrator Dallas Larson City Attorney Kurt Glaser City Engineer Mark Statz I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Capra called the August 8, 2007, City Council meeting to order at 6:33 p.m. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Capra deleted Item 2 from the Approval of Minutes, added page 10a and Item 7 to the Consent Agenda, and added Item 8 to New Business. Councilmember Lakso added Item 2: Red Cross Update to AnnouncementslUpdates. Motion by Council Member Paar. seconded by Council Member Lakso. to approve the a2enda as amended. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. III. PUBLIC HEARINGS None IV. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES 1. August 8, 2007 City Council Meeting Minutes Mayor Capra noted the motion on page five of six occurred at the park, just before motion to adjourn. Councilmember Broussard stated Counci1member Paar seconded the motion on page two, Item 1 of the consent agenda. City of CenterviIle Council Meeting Minutes August 22, 2007 Mayor Capra added the missing information on page six of six, paragraph two: 'Mayor Capra reported that Mr. Leo Hensel and Mrs. Margaret Hensel were presented a commemorative medal as part of the dedication to WWII veterans by Senator Vandeveer, Representative Detmer, Commissioner Sivarajah, Mayor Capra, and Linda Merkle, Veteran's Administration representative. ' Motion by Council Member Broussard. seconded by Council Member Paar. to approve the Aueust 8. 2007 City Council Meetine Minutes as amended. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 2. f..ugust 8, 2007, City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes 3. August 14, 2007 City Council Emergency Meeting Minutes Motion by Council Member Lee. seconded by Council Member Paar. to approve the Aueust 14. 2007 City Council Meetine Minutes as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. V. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City of Centerville August 9, 2007 through August 22, 2007 Claims. 2. Centennial Fire District Claims through August 15,2007 3. Centennial Lakes Police Department Claims Through August 9, 2007 4. Corrpro Annual Service Agreement Water Storage Tank/Clarifier - Water Tower - $495 5. ~chville Construction, Inc. Pay Request #5 - 20th Avenue Backage Road - $198,411.98 6. Burschville Construction, Inc. Change Order #4 - 20th Avenue Backage Road - $26,936.00 7. Approval of A warding Emergency Contract to Rivard Contracting/Central Wood Products for Removal of Brush/Tree Debris Associated with August 14, 2007 Storm Motion by Council Member Paar. seconded by Council Member Broussard to approve the Consent Aeenda items as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. VI. A W ARDSIPRESENTATIONS/APPEARANCES Officer Bill Jacobson introduced new Police Officer Angie Kruyer. VII. OLD BUSINESS 1. Street Construction Proiect a. Set Date for Open House Page 2 of8 City of CenterviIle Council Meeting Minutes August 22, 2007 City Engineer Statz reported that the feasibility report on the Street Construction Project would be finalized soon. He requested that Council schedule an open house for an informal meeting and a more formal public hearing later. Discussion ensued. Council reached consensus to set the informal open house for October 4 or 9, 2007 from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Council directed staffto publish the date, time, and location prior to the meeting. Motion by Council Member Broussard. seconded by Council Member Lakso. to schedule an open house for the 2009 Street and Utility Improvement Project on October 4 or 9. 2007. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. b. Authorize Soil Boring City Engineer Statz stated that he walked the streets to ensure the correct soil bores would be accomplished. He stated that two proposals with quotes were submitted. He recommended that Stork Twin City Testing Corporation be selected to conduct the soil boring. Discussion ensued. Motion by Council Member Broussard. seconded by Council Member Paar. to accept the bid for soil borine: submitted by Stork Twin City Testin~ Corporation pendine: modifications by the City Attorney and proof of insurance. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Sidewalk Proposals City Administrator Larson summarized the sidewalk proposals received from contractors. He stated that the cost would be approximately $40,000 to $45,000. He reported this should take care of the sidewalk issues for several years but that annual inspections will be made to identify unsafe conditions. Discussion ensued. Motion by Council Member Lee. seconded by Council Member Broussard. to approve a contract with Andrew Roth Concrete and Masonry for sidewalk repairs not to exceed $45.000 per Public Works recommendation. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Mr. Tom Lee - Reconciliation of the 2007 Parade Budget Mr. Tom Lee presented the 2007 parade budget to Council. He recommended that the City consider purchasing traffic signs for future events. He thanked all the volunteers. Page 3 of8 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes August 22, 2007 Discussion ensued. Motion by Mayor Capra, seconded by Council Member Broussard. to approve the Final Report and Reconciliation of the 2007 Parade Bud2et as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. VIII. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resident Request for Reimbursement of Tree and Brush Removal Mayor Capra stated that several residents requested she add this to the agenda. She explained that before answers were received from Anoka County, some residents had trees and brush removed at their own expense. She recommended that the City not reimburse these residents. Councilmember Lee commented that the City found a solution quickly and the residents should have been more patient. Discussion ensued Motion by Council Member Lakso. seconded by Council Member Lee. to deny the request for Reimbursement of Expenses Incurred by Residents for Tree and Brush Removal. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Proposed Water Supply Emergencies Ordinance Amendment City Administrator Larson summarized that the City would eventually need a water emergency plan which would establish procedures to impose water use reduction measures. He stated that this ordinance sets in motion what Council previously approved relative to water use and reduction measures. Discussion ensued. Motion by Council Member Lakso, seconded by Council Member Paar. to approve Ordinance #19, Second Series, an Ordinance Amendin2 Chapter 51 of the Centerville City Code by Amendin2 Section 51.09 Relatin2 to Municipal Water Service. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 3 . Wellhead Protection Plan a. Set Public Hearing b. Start Public Notification Period City Administrator Larson directed Council members to the Wellhead Protection Plan (WHP). He suggested that Council schedule a public hearing for November 14, 2007 and direct that the WHP draft be forwarded to concerned local and state agencies. He Page 4 of8 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes August 22, 2007 explained that after the public hearing and input from the public agencies, the City would be required to adopt a final WHP. He stated that staff expects the process would be completed by the end of 2007. Discussion ensued. City Administrator Larson stated that staff would review the maps for accuracy. Motion bv Council Member Broussard. seconded by Council Member Lee. to approve a Public Hearine: for November 14. 2007 and to direct staff to notify the appropriate ae:encies. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Proposal for Sod Replacement at Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park Commissioner Broussard requested that proof of insurance be a requirement to be met at the time of application. City Attorney Glaser recommended that this requirement be establish by ordinance. Motion by Council Member Lee. seconded by Council Member Paar. to approve the Proposed Sod Replacement at Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park and to require proof of insurance. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Resolution #07-031 - Domestic Violence Awareness Month Annually, the Alexandra House requests support for the acknowledging that October is Domestic Violence Awareness Month. Motion bv Council Member Paar. seconded bv Council Member Lakso. to approve Resolution #07-031. Domestic Violence Awareness Month. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Tax Increment Financing Plan Proposal for Kendall Howard Proiect Mr. Randy Harried, 1571 Stony Brook Drive, Lino Lakes, reported that Kendall Howard is seeking a site for a new building and Centerville is an attractive community. He explained that Kendall Howard is a national and international manufacturer of rack and shelving systems for the military as well as civilian use. He stated that they currently operate in a 20,000 square foot building in St. Paul and are experiencing shortage of space. Mr. Harried commented that Centerville has a site available where he would build a 50,000 square foot building with additional expansion capabilities. He explained that they are looking for TIF funding from the City. Mr. John Meyer, Finance Director, explained the choices available to the City for TIF. He displayed a site map to point out the location of the subject building and property. Page 5 of8 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes August 22, 2007 City Administrator Larson explained that Council must decided whether to support the business owner with TIF funds for this project. Discussion ensued. Councilmember Paar stated that he felt the property is overpriced and therefore, could not support this project with TIF funding. He stated that he would thrilled to have this business located in Centerville Councilmember Lee stated that he would be in favor of this project if it would work out. He referred to other TIF districts not approved due to the price of the property. He believes that this is a similar situation. Mr. Harried stated that they negotiated for about six months with the landowner and negotiated $100,000 reduction in the purchase price for the property. He commented that Centerville is where he would like to build. He stated that he would be more than happy to sign an agreement to pay back the entire TIF if he were ever to sell the business. He stated that this is his life and his children's legacy and he had no intention of selling. Councilmember Lakso stated that she did not see a TIF district at this time due to poor timing. She stated that she hoped creative options could be found, as she did not want to set precedence. Councilmember Broussard commented that there are other properties that might require more assistance in terms of mitigation to make them buildable sites. She agreed with the opinions of fellow Council members. Mayor Capra agreed with Councilmember Lakso and commented that she would like to see a guarantee from the company that it would remain in Centerville. She commented the City had property for sale also and several financial unknowns exist at this time. She stated that she is open to work with Mr. Harried. Mr. Harried questioned if the Council would be open to a pay as you go TIF. He stated that he has exhausted several other avenues for funding. Councilmember Lee stated that Council is open to discussion on options. Discussion ensued. Mr. Meyer stated that he met with the Minnesota Investment Fund concerning a low interest loan for Mr. Harried and explained how this would work. He commented Mr. Harried might qualify for a $160,000 loan through the program. He suggested that Council consider passing the resolution to hold a public hearing. Page 6 of8 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes August 22, 2007 Motion by Council Member Lee. seconded by Council Member Paar. to approve Resolution # 07-032 Callinl! for a Public Rearml! for the adoption Tax Increment Financinl! for TIF District 1-7. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Council Member Broussard. seconded by Council Member Lakso. to Direct Finance Director John Meyer to work with the Minnesota Investment Fund Project on the Kendal Howard Project. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 7. Apply for Reimbursement (SCORE Funds - Anoka County) for Tree/Brush Removal Services Mayor Capra reported that the City could apply for reimbursement of tree and brush removal service expenses up to the end of the year. The work qualifies for SCORE funds since the trees would be ground to mulch and used in parks. Discussion ensued. Motion by Council Member Lakso. seconded bv Council Member Paar. to direct staff to apply for Reimbursement (SCORE Funds - Anoka County) for Tree/Brush Removal Services. Vote: Ayes 4. Nay 1 (Broussard) Motion carried. Motion by Council Member Lee. seconded bv Council Member Lakso. that curbside pick up cease at the end of the day on AUl!Ust 23. 2007and direct staff to use excess funds from of the Emerl!ency Continl!ency Fund if available or out of the General Fund. Vote: Ayes 4. Nays 1 (Broussard) Motion carried. Mr. Wes Peterson, 7034 Brian Court, stated that the expressed concern from his neighborhood started when residents called City Hall and were told it was not the City's problem. He stated an employee of the City of Centerville told them that citations would be given if the trees and brush were not removed. He stated that this is the reason residents paid for their own tree and brush removal. He asked that staff be more receptive to questions from residents. Councilmember Lee stated that this was the first event for Centerville and everyone learned some lessons. He commented that the trees and brush on personal property are the responsibility of the resident and the City went over and above to assist with the removal. Discussion ensued. 8. Approval of Award of Bids Anoka County CSAH 14 Proiect - Revised Proiect Estimate City Engineer Statz presented a streetscaping bid for $517,000 from North Pine Aggregate. He stated that the bid looks fair and recommended Council approval. Page70f8 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes August 22, 2007 City Engineer Statz presented information on the City's portion of the cost estimate. He stated that the final cost estimate for the project would be approximately $1.2 million including the downtown streetscaping. Discussion ensued. Motion by Council Member Lee. seconded by Council Member Lakso. to approve the Award Part II of Bids Anoka County CSAH 14 Project - Revised Project Estimate to North Pine Ae:rie:ate in the amount of $517.000. Vote: Aves 4. Nays 1 (Broussard) Motion carried. IX. ANNOUNCEMENTSIUPDATES 1. City Administrator Larson - No Report 2. Red Cross Update Councilmember Lakso reported that CPR Saturdays begin in late September or early October. She stated that the Red Cross would begin training sessions on various safety and disaster preparedness topics. She stated that information would be in the paper and pamphlets are available at City Hall and Comer Express. Councilmember Lakso reported that on Tuesday August 28, 2007, Centerville would be at the Red Cross Booth at the Minnesota State Fair. Councilmember Paar announced that Centerville Road would be closed because of a culvert repair from August 27-29,2007. Mayor Capra thanked the volunteers who distributed information on the debris removal in the City. She thanked City staff for their hard work also. X. ADJOURNMENT Motion bv Council Member Lakso. seconded by Council Member Paar, to adjourn the Aue:ust 8, 2007 City Council Meetine: at 8:10 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed by: Dianna Wise, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Page 80f8 CITY OF CENTERVILLE 09/07/0710:49 AM Page 1 'E,st.a6t.!di,~>l1l6<- *Check Summary Register@ Name Check Date AUGUST 2007 to SEPTEMBER 2007 Check Amt 10100 MAIN STREET BANK Paid Chk# 022670 AFLAC 8/31/2007 Paid Chk# 022671 ASSURANT EMPLOYEE 8/31/2007 Paid Chk# 022672 MINNESOTA POLLUTION 8/31/2007 Paid Chk# 022673 QWEST 8131/2007 Paid Chk# 022674 ANOKA COUNTY PROPERTY 9112/2007 Paid Chk# 022675 AUTOMOTIVE DRIVE LINE 9112/2007 Paid Chk# 022676 AVLlC 9112/2007 Paid Chk# 022677 BENSON ORTH ASSOCIATES, 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022678 BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022679 CAN DAD CAMERA 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022680 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022681 CENTER POINT ENERGY 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022682 CHURCH OF ST GENEVIEVE 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022683 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022684 CONNEXUS ENERGY 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022685 CORNER EXPRESS 9/1212007 Paid Chk# 022686 CORRPRO WATERWORKS 9/1212007 Paid Chk# 022687 GUSTAFSON EXCAVATING, 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022688 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022689 KEY AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022690 L. N. SODDING 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022691 LARSON, DALLAS 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022692 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022693 MARATHON ASHLAND 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022694 MENARDS - FOREST LAKE 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022695 METRO SALES INCORPORATED 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022696 METROCALL 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022697 MIKES CLEAN SWEEP SERVICES 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022698 M-R SIGN COMPANY, INC. 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022699 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022700 NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022701 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIP. 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022702 ON SITE SANITATION 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022703 PAllER, PAUL 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022704 PRECISION EXCAVATING & 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022705 PRESS PUBLICATIONS 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022706 RIVARD CONTRACTING INC. 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022707 SECURITY CONTROL 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022708 STORK TWIN CITY TESTING 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022709 TIME SAVER 9/12/2007 Paid Chk# 022710 VEIT & COMPANY, INC. 9/12/2007 Total Checks $45.88 J. MCPHERSON & J MEYER AFLAC $121.50 SEPT. SHORT TERM VOLUNTARY DIS $23.00 RENEWAL FEE - P. PAllER $468.42 651-429-3232 PH SERV THRU 9-15 $400.00 BOND CERTIFICATION FEE $66.14 TUBE IN TRACTOR - REPAIR $606.00 DEF COMP W1H 9-6-07 $690.00 $60 WATER USAGE & REFUND DEPOS $111,989.41 BACKAGE RD AND 21ST AVE UT & S $533.75 SESQUICENTENNIAL - FETE DES LA $39,548.70 07 SEPTEMBER POLICE SERVICE $131.58 1880 MAIN STREET - SERV THRU 8 $100.00 DONATION FOR USE OF COMMUNITY $6,247.13 2007 POLICE BLDG PAYMENT FOR S $526.09 6900 20TH AVE - LIFT STATlON- $532.25 FUEL FOR JULY 07 $495.00 ANNUAL SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 5 $51,108.74 2007 FAIRVIEW STR. IMPROV. $73.97 BUILDING PERMIT - PLAQUE CARDS $138.64 MAIN ON AUTOS FO P.W. $1,053.00 NEW SOD, ROLLED, LAID, OLD SOD $108.64 REIMBURSE MILEAGE THRU 8-28-07 $3,277.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES $367.80 FUEL FOR AUGUST 2007 $30.76 SUPPLIES $687.50 QUARTERLY BIlliNG FOR COPIER M $8.10 ON CALL PAGER $213.00 CARPET CLEANING FOR CITY HALL $29.29 MEADOW LANE SIGN $600.92 DEF COMP W1H 9-6-07 $32.00 T. BENDER & J. MEYER LIFE INSU $10.63 SUPPLIES $917.00 6970 LAMOTTE DR - LAMOTTE PARK $544.42 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT FOR WAST $47,933.20 OLD MILL RD UT AND STR IMPROV. $51.80 CONDo USE - KOCH $12,950.00 TREE DEBRIS FROM STORM $255.60 BASIC MONITORING FEE FOR 12 MO $4,481.36 BACKAGE RD & 21ST AVE UT & STR $177.70 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - 8-22-07 $50,199.04 2007 HIDDEN SPRING PARK IMPROV $337,774.96 Please remember that there will be an updated list of disbursements for approval on 9-12-07. '," /~"'"....<;:...~..:, "../ ' ~ .. ,,_' ',v.,~::~nw-."" <.__ .",' '. , ,,-. . '0 ,_..../ 9 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Check Register FIRE GL GL Posting Period(s): 09107 - 09107 Check Issue 08.($): 0910112007 ~ 0910512OO7 Page: 1 Sep 05, 2007 11 :44am Per Da. Check No Vendor No Payee Invoice Description Inv Amount 09107 09105107 2827 20120 BATTERIES PLUS CHARGING CORDS 19.15 BATTERIES 132.53 Tofal2827 151 .68 09107 09/05107 2828 20140 MILO BENNETT CAT 5 CABLE 839.02 09107 09105/07 2829 30480 CENTENNIAL UTILITIES STATION 1 UTILITIES 78.87 09107 09105/07 2830 30490 CENTERPOINT ENERGY STATION 2 GAS 64.09 09/07 00105/07 2831 31008 COMCAST INTERNET 95.00 09107 09105/07 2832 31137 CONNEXUS ENERGY STATION 1 ELECTRIC 359.03 09107 09105107 2833 130348 MCLEOD USA STATION 2 PHONE 391.56 09107 09105107 2834 130460 METROCALL PAGERS 88.34 09107 09105107 2835 130850 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSN CONFERENCElPETERSm 750.00 09107 09105107 2836 140408 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS CELL PHONES 145.08 09107 09/05107 2837 160100 PAPER DIRECT SAFETY CAMP EXPENSE 58.93 09/07 09105107 2838 180500 RANDY ROLSTAD OFFICE SUPPLY 328.61 09107 09105107 2839 190900 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION FIRE SPRINKLER INSP 250.00 STATION 1 FIRE SPRINKLER INSP 187.50 STATION 2 T olal 2839 437.50 Totals: 3,785.51 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check /1) EN,GINIIR":S edpy,l .II- 1.- Bonestroo Owner: City of Centerville, 1880 Main Street, Centerville, MN 55038-9794 Date: AUQust 29, 2007 For Period: 7/18/2007 to 8/29/2007 Request No: 2 Contractor: Gustafson Excavatinq Inc, 661041 Oth Street, North Branch, MN 55056 CONTRACTOR'S REQUEST FOR PAYMENT 2007 FAIRVIEW STREET IMPROVEMENTS BONESTROO FILE NO 000616-06148-0 SUMMARY 1 Original Contract Amount 2 Change Order - Addition 3 Change Order - Deduction 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand 7 Amount Earned 8 Less Retainage 5% 9 Subtotal 10 Less Amount Paid Previously 11 Liquidated damages - 12 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. $ $ 4,720.00 $ 0.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2 $ 218,721.25 223.44125 211,467.78 0.00 211/46778 10/573.39 200,894.39 149,785.65 0.00 51/108.74 Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO 12 ;5-- Approved by Contractor: GUSTAFSON EXCAVATING INC Approved by Owner: CITY OF CENTERVILlE ~~~~ Specified Contract Completion Date: Date: 61606148REQ2.xls /1 Contract Unit Current Quantity Amount No. Item Unit Quantity Price Quantity to Date to Date PART 1 . SITE GRADING: 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 6700 00 $6,70000 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 1800.00 0.15 $1,800.00 3 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TN 35 20.00 $0.00 4 WATER MAIN TESTING LS 1 350.00 1 $350 00 5 CLOSED CIRCUIT TV INSPECTION - STORM SEWER LF 755 0.90 681 681 $612.90 6 CLOSED CIRCUIT TV INSPECTION - SANITARY SEWER LF 990 0.90 908 908 $81720 7 REMOVE PIPE CULVERT LF 50 300 50 $150 00 8 SILT FENCE, MACHINE SLICED LF 2800 180 380 2580 $4,64400 9 CLEAR AND GRUB LS 1 85000 1 $850.00 10 COMMON EXCAVATION (EV) CY 1050 3.50 1041 $3,64350 11 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV) CY 200 2.00 $000 12 GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CY 250 7.50 17297 17297 $1,29728 13 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CY 200 800 144 $1,15200 14 SEEDING, INCL. MNDOT SEED MIX 250, FERTIlIZER, DISK ANCHOR, AND CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROl BLANKET AC 1.6 1950.00 1.6 1.6 $3,12000 15 SEED MIXTURE - BWSR MIX W4 SY 200 250 100 100 $25000 16 TEMPORARY ROCK CHECK, CLASS I-IV CY 15 20.00 $000 TOTAL PART 1 - SITE GRADING: $25,38688 PART 2 - WATER MAIN: 17 FURNISH AND INSTALL GATE VALVE EXTENSION ROD EA 6 250.00 -3 $000 18 REPLACE TOP SECTION OF GATE VALVE BOX EA 3 150.00 3 3 $450 00 19 ClEAN OUT GATE VAlVE BOX EA 8 4000 $0.00 TOTAL PART 2 - WATER MAIN: $450.00 PART 3 - STORM SEWER: 20 FURNISH R-3067-V HOOD EA 2 150.00 1 $150.00 21 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EA 2 350.00 2 $70000 22 12" RCP STORM SEWER, ClASS 5 LF 12 2400 12 $288.00 23 15" RCP STORM SEWER, ClASS 5 LF 96 24.00 96 $2,30400 24 2' X 3' CB, INCL 2' SUMP, R-3290-A CSTG AND CONC ADJ RINGS EA 1 1450.00 1 $1,45000 25 2' X 3' CB, INCL 2' SUMP, R-3067-V CSTG AND CONC ADJ RINGS EA 1 1450.00 1 $1,450.00 26 15" RCP FLARED END SECTION, INCL. TRASH GUARD EA 2 750.00 2 $1,50000 27 CLASS III RANDOM RIPRAP CY 13 80.00 75 205 $1,640.00 28 CATCH BASIN PROTECTION - WIMCO EA 6 180.00 $0.00 TOTAL PART 3 - STORM SEWER: $9,48200 PART 4 - STREETS: 29 SUBGRADE PREPARATION - STREET SY 4300 0.80 4238 $3,39040 30 GEOTEXTlLE FABRIC, TYPE V SY 4300 1.40 4238 $5,93320 31 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN 2300 16.00 -100 2100 $33,60000 32 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CY 2590 7.50 424 2850 $21.37500 33 TYPE LV 3 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN 475 5220 96.39 495.39 $25,85936 34 TYPE LV 3 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN 475 52.95 475 475 $25,15125 35 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 215 230 100 100 $230.00 36 SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 1675 8.80 1635 $14,38800 37 4" PERFORATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE LF 1695 4.50 1605 $7,222 50 38 EXTEND HYDRANT BARREl LF 3 18000 $0.00 39 ADJUST CATCH BASIN CASTING EA 4 12500 3 $37500 40 ADJUST MANHOlE CASTING EA 10 11000 5 5 $55000 41 RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE LF 2 250.00 3.44 344 $86000 TOTAL PART 4 - STREETS: $138,93471 PART 5 - CSAH 54 RIGHT TURN LANE: 42 COMMON EXCAVATION (EV) CY 1010 2.50 1007 $2,51750 43 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV) CY 200 2.00 $0.00 44 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LF 600 3.00 585 $1)5500 45 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 50 1 10 $000 61606148REQ2 xis J,L Contract Unit Current Quantity Amount No. Item Unit Quantity Price Quantity to Date to Date 46 SUBGRADE PREPARATION - TURN LANE SY 900 0.80 824 $65920 47 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN 350 1600 270 $4,32000 48 AGGREGATE SHOULDERING, 100% CRUSHED LIMESTONE TN 60 1800 $0.00 49 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CY 550 750 406 756 $5,67000 50 TYPE LV 3 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN 260 54.10 230 $12,44300 51 TYPE LV 3 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (8) TN 90 54.95 90 90 $4,94550 52 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 130 230 80 80 $18400 53 SIGN PANELS, TYPE C, HIGH INTENSITY SF 12.5 42.00 $000 54 4" SOLID LINE, WHITE EPOXY LF 850 0.30 $000 55 PAVEMENT MESSAGE, RIGHT TURN ARROW - EPOXY EA 2 90.00 $0.00 TOTAL PART 5 - CSAH 54 RIGHT TURN LANE: $32,49420 CHANGE ORDER NO.1 LOCATE, EXPOSE, REMOVE AND REPLACE BOLTS ON EXISTING WATER MAIN LS 1 4720.00 $4,720.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO 1: $4,720.00 TOTAL PART 1 - SITE GRADING: TOTAL PART 2 - WATER MAIN: TOTAL PART 3 - STORM SEWER: TOTAL PART 4 - STREETS: TOTAL PART 5 - CSAH 54 RIGHT TURN LANE: TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO 1: $25,38688 $450.00 $9,48200 $138,93471 $32,49420 $4,72000 TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE $211,46778 61606148REQ2 xis /3 PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER CITY OF CENTERVILLE BONESTROO FILE NO. 000616-06148-0 CONTRACTOR GUSTAFSON EXCAVATING INC CHANGE ORDERS No. Date Description Amount 1 8/29/2007 This Change Order provides for compensation to the Contractor for the removal and replacement of bolts for the existing water main fittings $4,720.00 Total Change Orders I $4,72000 PAYMENT SUMMARY No. From To Payment Retainage Complete 1 07/01/2007 07/17/07 149,785.65 7,883.46 157,669.11 2 07/18/2007 08/29/07 51, 1 08. 74 10,573.39 211,467.78 d Material on Hand Total Payment to Date $200,894.39 Original Contract $218,721.25 Retainage Pay No. 2 10,573. 39 Change Orders $4,720.00 Total Amount Earned $211,467.78 Revised Contract $223,441.25 61606148REQ2 xis J! .tt' Bonestroo Owner: City of Centerville, 1880 Main Street, Centerville, MN 55038 Date August 29, 2007 Contractor: Gustafson Excavating Inc, 6610 41 Oth Street, North Branch, MN 55056 Bond Company: RUins Company, ,9025 N Lindbergh Dr, Peoria, IL, 61615 Bond No: CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 2007 FAIRVIEW STREET IMPROVEMENTS BONESTROO FILE NO, 000616-06148-0 .'...,.""., ENGtMIEIl';S cd ~;,' ; Descri'ption of Work This Change Order provides for compensation to the Contractor for the removal and replacement of bolts for the existing water main fittings on Fairview Street. Contract Unit Total No. Item Unit Quantity Price Amount CHANGE ORDER NO.1 LOCA TE, EXPOSE, REMOVE AND REPLACE BOLTS LS $4,720.00 $4,720.00 ON EXISTING WATER MAIN TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.1: $4,720.00 00061606148-0CHOI.xls j.:J Original Contract Amount Previous Change Orders This Change Order Revised Contract Amount (including this change order) CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES Original Contract Times: Substantial Completion (days or date): Ready for final Payment (days or date): Increase of th is Change Order: Substantial Completion (days or date): Ready for final Payment (days or date): Contract Time with all approved Change Orders: Substantial Completion (days or date): Ready for final Payment (days or date): Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO tt7- Approved by Contractor: GUSTAFSON EXCAVATING INC ~~~ ?'/.>~? Date cc: Owner Contractor Bonding Company Bones troo & Assoc 0006 1606 148-0CI-1O l.xIs Date: $218/721.25 $0.00 $4/720.00 $223,441.25 ":' ~.'~.. ". Approved by Owner: CITY OF CENTERVlllE Date /6 EN,GINEER'S COpy i .- Bonestroo Owner: City of Centerville, 1880 Main st., Centerville, MN 55038 Date: September 6, 2007 For Period: 8/17/2007 to 9/6/2007 Request No: 6 Contractor: Burschville Construction, Inc., 11440 8th St. NE, P. O. Box 65, Hanover, MN 55341 CONTRACTOR'S REQUEST FOR PAYMENT BACKAGE ROAD AND 21ST AVENUE UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS 80NESTROO FILE NO. 000616-05143-0 SUMMARY 1 Original Contract Amount 2 Change Order - Addition 3 Change Order - Deduction 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand 7 Amount Earned 8 Less Retainage 2% 9 Subtotal 10 Less Amount Paid Previously 11 Liquidated damages - 12 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. $ $ 40,039.16 $ 0.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 6 $ 1,118,251.90 1,158,291.06 1,140)75.91 0.00 1,140)75.91 22,815.52 1,117,960.39 1,005,970.98 0.00 111,989.41 Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO /ij Approved by Contractor: BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION, INC. -iL.J f 4~, 1 Approved by Owner: C1fY OFc:ENTERVIUE Specified Contract Completion Date: Date: 6160S143REQ6.xls /1 Contract Unit Current Quantity Amount No. Item Unit Quantity Price Quantity to Date to Date PART 1 - SITE GRADING: 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 10000.00 1 $10,000.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 2250.00 1 $2.250.00 3 SILT FENCE, REGULAR LF 3600 1.60 3174 $5,078.40 4 CLEAR AND GRUB LS 1 16000.00 1 $16,000.00 5 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) CY 66400 1.93 8205.47 65658.4 7 $126,72085 6 GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CY 11000 10.90 2267.57 10855.07 $118,320.26 7 SALVAGE AND RESPREAD TOPSOIL, 4" THICK LS 1 12950.00 1 $12,950.00 8 HAUL EXCESS TOPSOIL OFFSITE CY 10000 1.10 20797 $22,876.70 9 SHEEHY PROPERTY ACQUISITION DELAY - SEE SPECS LS 1 5000.00 1 $5,000.00 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS, CATEGORY 4 SY 2200 1.70 1095 $1,861.50 11 TEMPORARY ROCK CHECK, CLASS I-IV CY 75 95.00 9.76 3303 $3,13785 12 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC FOR ROCK CHECK, TYPE IV SY 110 10.00 107 $1,070.00 13 12" BIOROLL LF 150 6.50 125 125 $812.50 14 24" STORM SEWER CULVERT LF 30 35.00 24 $840.00 TOTAL PART 1 - SITE GRADING: $326,918.06 PART~ - SANITARY SEWER: 15 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANIT ARY SEWER 8" PVC PIPE EA 1 2000.00 1 $2,000.00 16 8" PVC SANITARY SEWER, SDR 35 LF 980 26.00 974 $25,324.00 17 4' DIAMETER SANITARY MH, 8' DEEP EA 4 185000 4 $7 .400 00 18 4' DIAMETER SANITARY MANHOLE OVERDEPTH LF 9 110.00 085 848 $932.80 19 INSULATION, 4" THICK SF 650 2.00 $0.00 20 CLOSED CIRCUIT TV INSPECTION LF 980 1.00 982 $982.00 21 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION. PER 6" INCREMENT LF 980 1.00 906 906 $906.00 TOTAL PART 2 - SANITARY SEWER: $37,544.80 PART 3 - WATER MAIN: 22 REMOVE WATER MAIN LF 90 20.00 160 $3,200.00 23 SALVAGE HYDRANT EA 1 1000.00 1 $1,000.00 24 JACK 12" WATERMAIN WITH CARRIER PIPE LF 55 390.00 57 $22,230.00 25 CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" WATER MAIN EA 1 1000.00 1 $ 1 .000.00 26 12" X 12" WET TAP EA 1 3200.00 1 $ 3 ,200.00 27 11" PVC WATER MAIN LF 1450 3100 1425 $44,175.00 28 8" PVC WATER MAIN LF 840 21.00 16 836 $17,556.00 29 6" PVC WATER MAIN LF 60 18.00 7.5 66 $ 1 , 188 00 30 12" GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 1 160000 1 $1,60000 31 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 2 95000 2 $1,900.00 32 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 4 750.00 4 $3.000.00 33 HYDRANT WITH VALVE EA 4 2700.00 4 $10,80000 34 12" FITTING RESTRAINT EA 26 85.00 26 $2,21000 35 8" FITTING RESTRAINT EA 15 4800 2 17 $816.00 36 6" FITTING RESTRAINT EA 32 39.00 1 33 $1,287,00 37 12" 22. 5 DEGREE BEND EA 4 380.00 4 $1,520.00 38 ... 12" X 6" TEE EA 7 48000 8 $3,84000 39 8" 90 DEGREE BEND EA 2 235.00 3 $705.00 40 8"X6"TEE EA 1 300.00 1 $300.00 41 8" X 8" TEE EA 1 37500 1 $375.00 42 12" X 8" REDUCER EA 1 27000 1 $27000 43 8" PLUG EA 1 100.00 1 $100.00 44 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION, PER 6" INCREMENT LF 2000 1.00 2015 2015 $2.015.00 TOTAL PART 3 - WATER MAIN $124,287.00 PART 4 - SERVICES: 45 6" PVC, SCH. 40 SERVICE PIPE LF 166 16.00 166 $2,656.00 46 6" PVC WATER MAIN LF 120 20.00 116 $2.320.00 47 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 4 750.00 4 $3,00000 48 8" X 6" PVC WYE EA 4 10000 4 $400.00 49 6" PLUG EA 4 80.00 4 8 $640.00 TOTAL PART 4 - SERVICES: $9,01600 61605143REQ6 xis j? Contract Unit Curient Quantity Amount No. Item Unit Quantity Price Quantity to Date to Date PART 5 - STORM SEWER: 50 42" RCP STORM SEWER LF 445 107.00 440 $47,08000 51 24" RCP STORM SEWER LF 230 3700 226 $8.362.00 52 18" RCP STORM SEWER LF 520 31.00 2 496 $15,376.00 53 15" RCP STORM SEWER LF 1125 2800 1097 $30,716.00 54 15" HOPE STORM SEWER LF 335 21.00 335 $7,035.00 55 42" FLARED END SECTION EA 2 320600 2 $6,412.00 56 24" FLARED END SECTION EA 1 1614.00 1 $1,614.00 57 18" FLARED END SECTION EA 6 94200 6 $5,652.00 58 15" FLARED END SECTION EA 9 845.00 10 $8,450.00 59 4' DIA MANHOLE EA 1 1800.00 1 $1,800.00 60 4' DIAMETER STORM CBMH EA 12 1850.00 11 $20.35000 61 5' DIAMETER STORM CBMH EA 1 250000 0.68 1.68 $4,200.00 62 2' X 3' CATCH BASIN EA 4 110000 4 $4,400.00 63 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE EA 4 175000 5 $8,750.00 64 CLASS III RANDOM RIPRAP CY 300 95.00 45.96 323.56 $30,73820 65 6" PVCDRAIN TILE LF 600 12.00 600 $7 ,200.00 66 I~STALt AND Iv1AINT AIN SEDIMENT A TION STRUCTURE EA 19 375.00 16.5 16.5 $6,187.50 67 REMOVE MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS ALONG PROPERTY LINE LS 1 800.00 1 $800.00 TOTAL PART 5 - STuRM SEWER: $215,122.70 PART 6 - STREETS: 68 SAW BITUMINOUS LF 135 3.25 32 $104.00 69 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 550 200 312 $624.00 70 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 225 225 165 $37 US 71 REM. & REPL. CHAIN LINK FENCE LF 50 2500 50 $1,250.00 72 SUBGRADE PREPARATION - STREET SY 10730 0.75 10450 $7,837.50 73 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE V SY 10730 138 280 10730 $14,807.40 74 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN 5275 11.40 155.84 5155.84 $58,776.58 75 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CY 5975 13.46 275 5975 $80,423. 50 76 TYPE LV 3 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN 1250 50.00 1156.95 $57,847.50 77 TYPE LV 4 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN 1250 57.75 130.45 1128.04 $65,144.31 78 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 575 2.60 145 645 $1,67700 79 SURMOUNT ABLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 2900 8.90 126 2626 $23,371.40 80 B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 1600 9.35 1684 $15,745.40 81 4" CONCRETE MEDIAN SY 30 38.00 22 $836.00 82 4" PERFORATED POL YETHYLENE PIPE LF 4500 2.75 438 4638 $12,754.50 83 BARRICADE EA 5 275.00 3 $825.00 84 ADJUST VALVE BOX EA 2 250.00 2 $500.00 85 STREET SWEEPER WITH OPERATOR HR 20 110.00 12 $1,320.00 86 4 MIL POLY SY 450 300 $000 87 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS, CATEGORY 3 SY 500 1.60 450 950 $1,52000 88 MNDOT SEED MIX 28B AC 5 775.00 2.75 6.75 $5,231.25 89 BWSR SEED MIXTURE W2 AC 4.5 1400.00 0.75 5.05 $7,07000 90 BWSR SEED MIXTURE U6 AC 2 1000.00 0.7 2.4 $2,40000 91 SODDING, LAWN TYPE SY 1150 3.50 260 $910.00 92 SIGN PANELS, TYPE C, HIGH INTENSITY SF 21 29.00 225 $652.50 93 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE, YELLOW EPOXY LF 900 0.95 413 $392.35 94 4" SOLID LINE, YELLOW EPOXY LF 2000 0.50 2097 $1,048.50 95 4" BROKEN LINE, YELLOW EPOXY LF 440 0.50 410 $205.00 96 4" SOLID LINE, WHITE EPOXY LF 250 0.50 250 $125.00 97 12" SOLID STOP LINE (BAR), WHITE EPOXY LF 35 8.50 26.5 $225.25 98 PAVEMENT MESSAGE, LEFT TURN ARROW - EPOXY EA 5 125.00 5 $625.00 99 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA 2 1000.00 2 $2,000.00 TOTAL PART 6 - STREETS: $366,620.19 PART 7 . CSAH 54 RIGHT TURN LANE: 100 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 1000.00 1 $1,000.00 101 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) CY 230 15.00 230 $3,450.00 102 SAWING BITUMINOUS LF 500 2.75 $0.00 103 SUBGRADE PREPARATION SY 750 0.75 750 $562.50 61605143REQ6 xis /9 Contract Unit Current Quantity Amount No. Item Unit Quantity Price Quantity to Date to Date 104 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN 270 11.50 200 $2,30000 105 TYPE LV 3 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN 95 5800 90 $5,220.00 106 TYPE MV3 NON-WEAR COURSE (C) TN 65 66.00 60 $3,960.00 107 TYPE MV3 WEAR COURSE (C) IN 65 66.00 60 $3,960.00 108 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 80 260 50 $130.00 109 4" SOLID LINE, WHITE EPOXY LF 720 0.50 695 $34750 110 PAVEMENT MESSAGE. RIGHT TURN ARROW - EPOXY EA 1 125.00 2 $250.00 111 SEEDING AC 0.2 775.00 $0.00 TOT AL PART 7 - CSAH 54 RIGHT TURN LANE: $21,180.00 CHANGE ORDER NO.1 1 CREW TIME HR 3.5 725.00 3.5 $2,53750 2 8" DIP PLUG EA 1 73.49 1 $73.49 3 CREW TIME HR 7 725.00 7 $5,07500 4 8" DIP 45 DEGREE BEND EA 4 27988 4 $1,119.52 5 8" PVC, C900 WATERMAIN LF 10 14.72 10 $ 147 20 6 . 15" ROCK.STABllIZATION TN 15 19.73 15 $295.95 7 CREW TIME " __ HR 0.5 72500 0.5 $362.50 TOT AL CHANGE ORDER NO.1 $9,61116 CHANGE ORDER NO.2 1 8" DIP WATER MAIN, CLASS 52 LF 35 29.00 35 $1,01500 2 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 1 95000 1 $950.00 3 CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" WATER MAIN EA 1 1000.00 1 $1,00000 4 8" 90 DEGREE BEND EA 1 235.00 1 $ 23 5.00 5 8" PLUG EA 1 100.00 1 $100.00 6 8" FITTING RESTRAINT EA 4 4800 5 $240.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.2 $3,54000 CHANGE ORDER NO.4 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 3000.00 1 $3.000.00 2 21" RCP STORM SEWER LF 432 3550 432 $15,336.00 3 21" RCP FLARED END SECTION EA 1 1500 00 1 $1,500.00 4 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL 6" PVC DRAINTILE LF 200 18.00 200 $3,600.00 5 RIP RAP, CLASS III CY 15 100,00 15 $1,500.00 6 RESTORE DRAINAGE SWALE LS 1 2000,00 1 $2,000.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.4 $26,936.00 TOTAL PART 1 - SITE GRADING: TOT AL PART 2 - SANITARY SEWER: TOT AL PART 3 - WATER MAIN: TOTAL PART 4'. SERVICES: IOTAL PART 5 - STORM SEWER: TOTAL PART 6 - STREETS: TOT AL PART 7 - CSAH 54 RIGHT TURN LANE: TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.1 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.2 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.4 TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE $326,918.06 $37,544BO $124,287.00 $9,01600 $215,122.70 $366,620.19 $21,180.00 $9,611,16 $3,540,00 $26,936.00 $1.140.775.91 61605143REQ6 xis )/J PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER CITY OF CENTERVILLE BONESTROO FILE NO. 000616-05143-0 CONTRACTOR BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION, INC. CHANGE ORDERS No. Date Description Amount 1 7/28/2006 This Change Order provides for additional work on this project. See $9,611.16 Change Order. 2 8/4/2006 This Change Order provides for a watermain extension requested by the $3,492.00 City of Lino Lakes. See Change Order. 3. . 10/6/2006 This Change Order provides for adjustments- to the completion dates for this project. This Change Order does not provide for any additional payment to the Contractor as a result of this change. See Change Order. 4 8/16/2007 This Change Order provid2s for additional storm sewer on this project at $26,936.00 the request of Anoka County. See Change Order. Total ChanQe Orders $40,039.16 PAYMENT SUMMARY No. From To Payment Retamaqe omplete 1 06/01/2006 07118/06 104,734.60 5,512.35 110,246.95 2 07119/2006 09/01/06 75,984.00 9,511.51 190,230.11 3 09/0212006 10/17/06 353,140.84 28,097.87 561,957.31 4 10/18/2006 11/22/06 273,699.56 42,503.11 850,062.11 5 11/23/2006 08/16/07 198.411.98 52,945.84 1,058,916.82 6 08/17/2007 09/06/07 111,989.41 22,815.52 1,140,775.91 C d Material on Hand Total Payment to Date $1,117,960.39 Oriqinal Contract $1,118,251.90 Retainaqe Pay No. 6 22,815.52 Chanqe Orders $40,039.16 Total Amount Earned $1,140,775.91 Revised Contract $1,158,291.06 61605143REQ6.xls l-/ Letter of Transmittal To: Dallas Larson Date: 9/6/2007 We are sending you: ~ Attached 0 Under Separate Cover o Shop Drawings 0 Specifications 0 Drawings o Copy of letter 0 Change order 0 Samples o Projed: Backage Road File No: 616-05-143 Copies Description Code 3 Pay Request #6 2 These are transmitted: (See Code) 1. For approval 2. For your use 3. As requested 4. For review and comment 5. Approved 6. Approved as noted 7. Revise and Resubmit 8. Rejeded 9. Not reviewed 10. Remarks: Si(tCh~ cc: ... Bonestroo 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com p EN\GI.'Ne-EIR',Seopyl -tt Bonestroo Owner: City of Centerville, 1880 Main Street, Centerville, MN 55038-9794 Date: September 5, 2007 For Period: 81712007 to 9/5/2007 Request No: 3 Contractor: Veit & Company, Inc, 14000 Veit Place, Roqers, MN 55374 CONTRACTOR'S REQUEST FOR PAYMENl 2007 HIDDEN SPRING PARK IMPROVEMENTS BONESTROO FILE NO 000616-07155-0 SUMMARY 1 Original Contract Amount 2 ' Change Order - Addition 3 Change Order - Deduction 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand 7 Amount Earned 8 Less Retainage 5% 9 Subtotal 10 Less Amount Paid Previously 11 Liquidated damages - 12 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO, $ $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 3 $ 218,281.00 218,281.00 213,112.35 0.00 213,112.35 10,655.62 202,456.73 152,257.69 .0.00 50,199.04 Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO a ;5'~ Approved by Contractor: VEil & COMPANY, INC Approved by Owner: CITY OF CENlERVILlE Q<1t--~ ~ .-J ~ Specified Contract Completion Date: Date: 61607155REQ3,xls ,13 Contract Unit Current Quantity Amount No. Item Unit Quantity Price Quantity to Date to Date PART 1 . SITE GRADING: 1 MOBILlZA TlON LS 1 18000.00 1 $18,000.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 550.00 1 $550.00 3 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TN 35 25.00 47 47 $1,17500 4 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 100 3.50 71 $24850 5 REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE LF 28 2300 28 $644.00 6 REMOVE BITUMINOUS/GRAVEL DRIVEWAY & TRAIL SY 500 1.60 575 575 $92000 7 SILT FENCE, MACHINE SLICED LF 620 1.65 230 $379.50 8 PROTECTIVE FENCING LF 1350 1.95 570 970 $1,891.50 9 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS, CATEGORY 3 SY 660 1.75 398 398 $696.50 10 CLEAR AND GRUB TREE 10 1100.00 1 11 $12,10000 11 TREE PRUNING / TRIMMING EA 4 890.00 4 $3,56000 12 COMMON EXCAVATION lEV) CY 500 3.00 500 $1,500.00 13 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV) CY 100 6.00 95 95 $570.00 14 GRANULAR BORROW ICV) CY 100 1300 95 95 $1,235.00 15 SUBGRADE PREPARATION SY 700 1.50 654 654.;, $981.00 16 STRIP, STOCKPILE, RESPREAD EXISTING TOPSOIL LS 1 7700.00 1 $7.70000 17 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CY 200 2500 229.2 229.2 $5)3000 18 FURNISH & INSTALL RAIN GARDEN SOIL MIX (CV) CY 80 7000 45.72 105.72 $7,400.40 TOTAL PART 1 - SITE GRADING: $65,28140 PART 2 - WATER MAIN: 19 1" CURB STOP AND BOX EA 1 108.00 1 $108.00 20 3/4" CURB STOP AND BOX EA 2 92.00 2 $18400 21 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE EA 1 325.00 1 $32500 22 CONNECT TO EXISTING 1" STEEL ARTESIAN WELL PIPE EA 1 650.00 1 $650.00 23 3/4" TYPE" K" COPPER WATER SERVICE LF 100 30.00 75 $2,250.00 TOTAL PART 2 - WATER MAIN: $3,51700 PART 3 . STORM SEWER: 24 15" HDPE STORM SEWER LF 48 2500 43 $1,075.00 25 10" HDPE STORM SEWER LF 40 2100 36 $756.00 26 12" HDPE OUTFLOW WITH BEEHIVE LF 20 55.00 30 $1,650.00 27 15" HDPE FLARED END SECTION EA 1 315.00 1 $315.00 28 12" HDPE FLARED END SECTION EA 1 310.00 1 $31000 29 10" HDPE FLARED END SECTION EA 4 310.00 $000 30 CONNECT TO EXISTING CATCH BASIN EA 1 650.00 1 $650.00 I , I 31 ORNAMENTAL SLAB LIMESTONE OUTFLOW STRUCTURE EA 2 2780.00 2 $5,560.00 TOTAL PART 3 - STORM SEWER: $10,316.00 PART 4 - TRAilS AND EQUIPMENT PADS: 32 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE V SY 700 1.50 ,. 654 $98100 33 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5, 100% CRUSHED LIME ROCK. TRAIL AND PADS TN 266 30.00 43.09 280.09 $8,402.70 34 SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 100 nOD 71 $1,562.00 35 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK SF 200 5.00 200 $1,000.00 36 TRUNCATED DOME PANEL SF 24 20.00 16 $320.00 37 ZEBRA CROSSWALK - EPOXY SF 126 10.00 90 $900.00 TOTAL PART 4 - TRAILS AND EQUIPMENT PADS: $13,165.70 PART 5 - SITE FURNISHINGS: 38 BENCHES - DuMor 88-60PL-S-1 EA 3 1050.00 3 3 $3,150.00 39 GLIDER BENCH - DuMor 30-6' -5.1 EA 1 1840.00 $0.00 40 LInER I RECYCLING RECEPTAClES - 41-32PL-2-1 EA 2 840.00 2 2 $1,680.00 41 GRILLS - DuM or 21-00-5-1 EA 2 590.00 2 2 $1,180.00 42 BIKE RACK - DuMor 130-20-5-1 EA 1 640.00 1 1 $640.00 43 DRINIKING FOUNTAIN - MOST DEPENDABLE MODEL 440 DB EA 1 3700.00 1 $3,700.00 TOTAL PART 5 - SITE FURNISHINGS: $10,3 50. 00 61607155RE Q3.x1s /4 Contract Unit Current Quantity Amount No. Item Unit Quantity Price Quantity to Date to Date PART 6 - RAIN GARDEN AND SWALES: 44 RAIN GARDEN SWAlE WITH WASHED RIVER ROCK IF 77 36.50 62 $2,26300 45 ORNAMENTAL SLAB LIMESTONE OUTCROPS / lEDGES / GROUPINGS lS 1 815000 0.25 1 $8,150.00 46 4" PERFORATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE, INCl. AGGREGATE AND GEOFABRIC IF 74 1100 65 $715.00 TOTAL PART 6 - RAIN GARDEN AND SWALES: $11,128.00 PART 7 - ARTISAN WElL: 47 ARTISAN WEll- BASIN (POND LINER), STEPPED SWAlE WITH ORNAMENTAL SLAB lS 14100.00 0.15 $14,10000 48 LIMESTONE OUTCROPS /lEDGES / GROUPINGS lS 1214000 0.15 $12,140.00 TOTAL PART 7 - ARTISAN WEll: $26,24000 PART 8 - LANDSCAPING: 49 RAIN GARDEN & SWAlE SHRUBS, FORBS, PERENNIALS, GRASSES, AND BLANKET lS 1 2772500 0.1 0.85 $23,566.25 50 SODDING, LAWN TYPE SY 5000 350 3018 5568. $19,488.00 TOTAL PART 8 - lANDSCAPING: $43,05425 PART 9 - ELECTRICAL: 51 ELECTRIC WORK lS 1 10700.00 0.5 $10)0000 TOTAL PART 9 - ElECTRICAL: $10,70000 ALTERNATE 3 NO. - SHORELAND STABILIZATION/RENOVATION: 55 SHORElAND STABILIZATION / RENOVATION IF 7.20 88.00 40 220 $19,360.00 TOTAL AlTERNATE 3 NO. - SHORElAND STABILIZATION/RENOVATION: $19,360.00 TOTAL PART 1 - SITE GRADING: TOTAL PART 2 - WATER MAIN: TOTAL PART 3 - STORM SEWER: TOTAL PART 4 - TRAilS AND EQUIPMENT PADS: TOTAL PART 5 - SITE FURNISHINGS: TOTAL PART 6 - RAIN GARDEN AND SWALES: TOTAL PART 7 - ARTISAN WEll: TOTAL PART 8 - lANDSCAPING: TOTAL PART 9 - ELECTRICAl: TOTAL AlTERNATE 3 NO. - SHORElAND STABILIZATION/RENOVATION: $65,28140 $3,517.00 $10,316.00 $13,165.70 $10,350.00 $11,128.00 $26,24000 $43,05425 $10,70000 $19,36000 TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE $213,112.35 61607155REQ3.x1s ~ PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER CITY OF CENTERVILLE BONESTROO FILE NO. 000616-07155-0 CONTRACTOR VEIT & COMPANY, INC. CHANGE ORDERS No. Date Description Amount Total Change Orders PAYMENT SUMMARY No. From To Payment Retainage Completed 1 06/01/2007 07/26/07 59,292.83 3,120.68 62,413. 51 2 07/27/2007 08/06/07 92,964.86 8,013.56 160,271.25 3 08/07/2007 09/05/07 50,199.04 10,655.62 213,112.35 Material on Hand Total Payment to Date $202,456.73 Original Contract $218,281.00 Retainage Pay No. 3 10,655.62 Chanqe Orders Total Amount Earned $213,112.35 Revised Contract $218,281.00 61607155REQ3.xls ,& Letter of Transmittal Date: 9/6/07 Project: Hidden Spring Park File No: 616-07-155 To: Dallas larson Re: Pay Request #3 We are sending you: [8J Attached 0 Under Separate Cover o Shop Drawings 0 Specifications 0 Drawings o Copy of Letter 0 Change order 0 Samples o Copies Description Code 3 Pay Request #3 2 These are transmitted: (See Code) 1. For approval 5. Approved 2. For your use 6. Approved as noted 3. As requested 7. Revise and resubmit 4. For review and comment 8. Rejected 9. Not reviewed 10. Remarks: cc: ~ ... Bonestroo 2335 Highway 36 W 5t. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com /-1 .. .tt Bonestroo Owner: City of Centerville, 1880 Main Street, Centerville, MN 55038 Date: September 6, 2007 For Period: 8/15/2007 to 9/6/2007 Request No: 1 Contractor: Precision Excavatinq & GradinqUC, 2104 Pierce/Saint Croix Road, Baldwin, WI 54002 CONTRACTOR'S REQUEST FOR PAYMENT OLD MILL ROAD UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS BONESTROO FILE NO, 000616-06147-0 SUMMARY 1 Original Contract Amount 2 Change Order - Addition 3 ChangeOrder - Deduction 4 Revised Contract Amount 5 Value Completed to Date 6 Material on Hand 7 Amount Earned 8 Less Retainage 5% 9 Subtotal 10 Less Amount Paid Previously 11 Liquidated damages - 12 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. $ 297,494.75 $ $ 0.00 0.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 297,494.75 50,456.00 0.00 50,456.00 2,522.80 47,933.20 0.00 0.00 47,933.20 Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO 1t7 Approved by Contractor: PRECISION EXCAVATING & GRADING llC ~G';'" ~ Approved by Owner: CITY OF CENTERVILLE Specified Contract Completion Date: Date: ..- 61606147-0REQ1.x1s 4 Contract Unit Current Quantity Amount No. Item Unit Quantity Price Quantity to Date to Date PART 1 . SITE GRADING: 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 6000.00 09 09 $5.40000 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 100000 0.5 0.5 $ 500 00 3 DEWATERING LS 1 1.00 $0.00 4 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TN 75 20.00 35 35 $700.00 5 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 2500 1.00 2400 2400 $2,400.00 6 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 215 4.00 $0.00 7 REMOVE LANDSCAPE WOOD BARRIER LS 1 50000 $500.00 8 REMOVE RCP CULVERT LF 60 4.00 $0.00 9 REMOVE CMP CULVERT LF 60 2.00 18 18 $36.00 10 REMOVE SANIT ARY SEWER PIPE LF 25 500 $0.00 11 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL EXISTING CMP CULVERT IF 45 5.55 $0.00 12 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL MAILBOX EA 4 100.00 2 2 $200.00 13 SALVAGE, STOCKPilE, AND REINSTAll AGGREGATE BASE CY 350 450 50 SO $225.00 14 SALVAGE, STOCKPilE, AND RESPREAD EXISTING TOPSOIL LS 1 330000 0.5 0.5 $1,650.00 15 SilT FENCt MACHINE SLICED LF 500 1.40 $0.00 16 CLEAR AND GRUB LS 1 1 500 00 0.8 0.8 $1,200.00 17 COMMON EXCAVATION (EV) CY 3890 400 2600 2600 . $10.40000 18 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV) CY 1000 4.00 $0,00 19 TOPSOil BORROW (LV) CY 250 12,00 $000 20 PROTECTION OF CB IN STREET - FURNISH AND INSTALL WIMCO EA 5 195,00 2 $390.00 21 SODDING, LAWN TYPE SY 915 4.00 $000 22 SEEDING, INCL. MNDOT SEED MIX 270, FERTILIZER, MULCH, AND DISK ANCHOR AC 1 1500.00 $0.00 TOTAL PART 1 - SITE GRADING $23,60100 PART 2 . SANITARY SEWER: 23 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EA 1 400.00 $0.00 24 8" PVC SANITARY SEWER, SDR 35, ALL DEPTHS LF 699 19.00 $0.00 25 4' DIA SANITARY MH, INCl. R-1733 CSTG, AND CONC ADJ RINGS EA 3 1800.00 $0.00 26 4' DIAMETER SANITARY MANHOLE OVERDEPTH LF 19 15000 $0,00 27 8" X 4" PVC WYE, SDR 35 EA 5 55.00 $0.00 28 10" X 4" SADDLE WYE, SDR 35 EA 1 75.00 $0.00 29 8" PVC PLUG EA 3 5000 $0.00 30 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION LF 699 200 $0.00 31 CLOSED CIRCUIT TV INSPECTION LF 699 100 $0.00 TOTAL PART 2 - SANITARY SEWER: $0,00 PART 3 - WATER MAIN: 32 CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" WATER MAIN EA 1 400.00 $0.00 33 8" PVC C900 WATER MAIN LF 660 24.00 $0.00 34 6" PVC C900 WATER MAIN LF 35 21. 00 $0.00 35 8" GATE VALVE.AND BOX EA 1 1250.00 $0.00 36 HYDRANT WITH VALVE EA 2 3100.00 $0.0.0 37 DUCTILE,IRON FITTINGS LB 1400 250 $0.00 38 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION LF 695 2,00 $000 TOTAL PART 3 - WATER MAIN: $0,00 PART 4 . SERVICES: 39 1" CORPORATION STOP WITH 8" SADDLE EA 6 125.00 $0,00 40 1" CURB STOP AND BOX EA 6 145.00 $0.00 41 1" TYPE "K" COPPER WATER SERVICE LF 320 1700 $0.00 42 4" PVC, SCH, 40 SERVICE PIPE LF 270 16.00 $0.00 43 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION IF 300 2,00 $0.00 44 INSULATION, 4" THICK SY 25 26.00 $0.00 TOTAL PART 4 - SERVICES: $0.00 PART 5 . STORM SEWER: 45 CONNECT TO EXISTING CATCH BASIN EA 1 35000 $0.00 46 15" RCP STORM SEWER, CLASS 5 LF 453 26.00 $0.00 47 24" RCP STORM SEWER, CLASS 3 LF 232 3700 165 165 $6,105.00 48 24" FLARED END SECTION, INClUDING TRASH GUARD EA 1 1375.00 1 1 $ U75.00 61606147-0REQ1.xls .29 Contract Unit Current Quantity Amount No. Item Unit Quantity Price Quantity to Date to Date 49 4' DIA STORM SEWER CBMH, INCL R-3067-VB CSTG, AND CONC ADJ RINGS EA 2 130000 $0.00 SO 4' DIA STORM SEWER CBMH, INCL R-3067-V CSTG, AND CONC ADJ RINGS EA 1 1325.00 $0.00 51 4' DIA STORM SEWER MH , INCL R-1733 CSTG, AND CONC AD! RINGS EA , 150000 $1,500.00 52 ClASS III RANDOM RIPRAP CY 12 55.00 $0.00 53 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION LF 200 200 $0.00 54 ClOSED CIRCUIT TV INSPECTION LF 685 1.00 $0.00 TOTAL PART 5 - STORM SEWER $8,980.00 PART 6 - STREETS: 55 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LF 315 200 $0.00 56 SUBGRADE PREPARATION - STREET SY 3300 0.50 $0.00 57 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE V SY 3300 130 $0.00 58 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CY 2000 9.50 $000 59 AGGREGATE BASE, ClASS 5 TN 1570 1275 $0,00 60 TYPE LV 3 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN 380 52.50 $0.00 61 TYPE LV. 3 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TN 290 58.25 $0,00 62 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 275 200 $0.00 63 SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER' LF 1470 895 $000 64 ADJUST EXISTING CATCH BASIN CASTING EA 1 125.00 $000 65 ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE CASTING EA 2 175,00 $0.00 66 4" PERFORATED POL YETHYLENE PIPE, WITH SOCK WRAP IF 1500 3.00 $0.00 67 STREET SWEEPER (PICKUP BROOM W/OPERATOR) HR 5 100.00 3 $300.00 TOTAL PART 6 - STREETS $30000 ALTERNATE NO.1 - POND AND WETLAND CONSTRUCTION: 68 SilT FENCE, MACHINE SLICED LF 1000 200 600 600 $1,200,00 69 ClEAR AND GRUB LS 1 5000,00 1 1 $5,000.00 70 SALVAGE, STOCKPilE, AND RESPREAD EXISTING TOPSOIL LS 1 5500.00 0,5 0.5 $2.750,00 71 COMMON EXCAVATION (EV) CY 4600 2,50 3450 3450 $8,625.00 72 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CY 500 12.00 $0,00 73 SOil BLEND FILTRATION MEDIA CY 150 45.00 $000 74 12" RCP STORM SEWER, CLASS 5 LF 8 35.00 $0,00 75 12" RCP FLARED END SECTION, INCl TRASH GUARD EA 2 700.00 $0.00 76 6" PERFORATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE, INCl. SOCK WRAP, AGGREGATE, AND FABRIC IF 110 12.00 $0.00 77 6" PVC SOLID COVER CLEAN OUT - PER DETAIL EA , 200.00 $0.00 78 EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SWAlE WITH ENKAMAT SY 15 30.00 $000 79 ClASS II RANDOM RIPRAP CY 75 50.00 $0.00 80 SEEDING, INCL. MNDOT SEED MIX 270, FERTILIZER, MULCH, AND DISK ANCHOR AC 12 1200.00 $000 81 MNDOT MIX W5 - WETLAND MITIGATION AREAS AC 0,5 5000,00 $0.00 82 MNDOT MIX 328 - INFILTRATION AREAS AC 0.15 6500.00 $000 83 EROSION CONTROl BLANKETS, CATEGORY 3 SY 1150 1.15 $0.00 84 MNDOT MIX 190 - TEMPORARY SEED FOR STOCKPilE lS 1 500.00 $0.00 TOTAL AlTERNATE NO 1 - POND AND WETLAND CONSTRUCTION $' 7, 575.00 TOTAL PART 1 - SITE GRADING $23,601,00 TOTAL PART 2 - SANITARY SEWER: $0.00 TOTAL PART 3 - WATER MAIN: $0.00 TOTAL PART 4 - SERVICES: $0.00 TOTAL PART 5 - STORM SEWER: $8,980.00 TOTAL PART 6 - STREETS: $300.00 TOTAL AlTERNATE NO, 1 - POND AND WETLAND CONSTRUCTION: $17,575.00 TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE $ 50,456.00 61606147-0REQ1xls 3c? PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER CITY OF CENTERVILLE BONESTROO FILE NO. 000616-06147-0 CONTRACTOR PRECISION EXCAVATING & GRADING LLC CHANGE ORDERS No. Date Description Amount Total Change Orders PAYMENT SUMMARY No. From 1 08/15/2007 To 09/06/07 Payment 47,933.20 Retainage 2,522.80 Completed 50,456,00 Material on Hand Total Payment to Date $47,933.20 Original Contract $297,494.75 Retainage Pay No. 1 2,522.80 Change Orders Total Amount Earned $50,456.00 Revised Contract $297,494.75 61606147-OREQ1 xis 3/ Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association AMENDMENT TO SERVICES AGREEMENT Safety Manaaement Proaram Contract Date: Auaust 28. 2007 Contract Number: 172-2008 The services agreement entered into between Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association (MMUA) and City of Centerville (Centerville), dated May 1,2006, contract number 172a-2006, is amended as follows: PART II. Section 1. 1. DURATION: This Agreement shall remain in force from October 1, 2007 until September 30,2008 (the "expiration date"). PART III. Section 1. 1. COMPENSATION: For the services covered by this Agreement, Centerville shall pay MMUA an annual fee of five thousand nine hundred dollars and 00 cents ($ 5,900.00) for the 2007-08 annual period. Such compensation shall be due and payable according to the selected payment terms below. Payment terms for the fee agreed to above shall be based on one of the following options (select one): o Annual Payment ($ 5,900.00) o Quarterly Payments ($ 1,475.00 each) For any term of less than twelve full calendar months, the fee shall be a portion of the annual fee, pro-rated based on the number of calendar months or partial calendar months in which the services were provided as a percentage of twelve (12). The parties hereby accept the terms of the Agreement as modified. City of Centerville Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association By 1~ /4-1 Title Executive Director By Title Date Date Auaust 28. 2007 Purchase Order # 3~ -:E CUo.. r:::<D .- "It LLi-i .... ...: o o ~ N - CO c o ;; ca - ::s u c - o ca ~EOOC) 'g cu ~ g =o,u.~N c( 0 g- ell" Q.... ~o.. -.8 ,-~ - :s c 0 E ::J CD '- .s tClEc)~ Q.CD 0 tn 1)C) 'c CU '-.... = C ...... 0 ~CU ~o J!::E ::IE ~ o ~...... ... ell ... - u> Q) !~ ~'8 i~ ~ g .. GIs::. Q... III C N..... <ON It)N CO :-.0 ..... 13:E GI COO('f)C'\lCX)O lO <00<0<')0>0 N U <1iOcOMMO ai C l!! ~OCX)CO~O <0 f'--."Ilt~C\I"""''''lIt N :! (fi~~ - -~ . ~ .....N is ~.... ~ CO 0"'" CO NO lO <00<')<000 ..... ""ii~ u:ici"";cdccio 0 ~:=.. ....0,.....,...1,(')0 0 ....&0,.....,...,...,0 <0 UlCl'lI N,no;No;,n ri OCs::. ~<(J .,...6t9-('t).,...C\I...... ..... .... ~~~~ ~ 000000 0 OOOOlOO lO :-. oIl'iIl'iO"';O ,..; ~ 'C ~ 1,(')""'" C\I I,(')...LO <0 CO.., CO <').....CO .., ,...!.. NT''': ai r:ri a:i Mo- O; 8l'l1~ ~~~~....~ N N6(J ~ 000000 0 000000 0 8ii~ 000000 0 0000""0 ..... . := .. ..,cnC"l..,'lt'lt CO ..... C l'lI "':lIlaiM'NIIl ...: OC.c 'I"".,.C")...f'l').... ..... ~<(J ~ ... ... ... ... ..... ... III -~ 50 It) ..,glOg.... It) <0 Oog ..... (").....(")('1") <0 I- E w III J! ~.! .!!! =(Q.~=(,,) ....~c:::_:=~ <Ii ~ ~~6g~U. a; co Q) 0 .- ~...; '0 (J (..)() () :2: a. (f.) ~ <0000000 <0 QI"'!~~~~~~ 0> (,)<00..,0000 0 CIt)O.....ON...... 0> ;~~~~~ ..... . ~~ ~ ~ Q lOOOOOOO lO e> .....0<00000 ..... ,...Il'ioll'ioooo 0 0 ~It)OCOOCON<O 0 iii I()I.t)LOCOO.,........ <0 8 ci N ..,- cD N ri ..,- ri :;, ao.,...~tf9.~ER-ER- ..... e N~"" ~ e ~ I- "aI W .....000000 ..... -l!: (!) .....000000 ": .9 CI)":oooooo ..... >.= Cl Q.....QOOONUl en _Ill .CDG')O....&ft........ C"l '0 E => l:; NNIIl.oN M'." 00 CO Qoo....~.,......,.... ..... ~ cb (\I...... ..... o .... ... >.0 a.. 00> => - It) ~;g 0 0>' c..... ~ ",It) (!) a; -5~ 'C o~ W CD t::cv B ~$ (,) 8.:2: C ~ .- Z III g. 0(1 e ",;g <( is(f.)~ Cl .S1 ~:; C C ~ Ql 0(1 1Il '6> 0 ~cb C C " () a.. ~68. 0_0(1 :Sf! :E 'ii) >< .....I ai c ' o(I'-WQlo(leCl <') ~2:BCllllQ.'S Ql<O 0 Ill..... ~8._~a;'s.S Iii "'- (,) ",:;,lE=Qlcrl!! '0 .9!Iii (f.)(f.)O:2::2:WI- ~ a.() q g i '" x e a; :;: 1il ~ a; 0> "0 ~ ~ !!! e ll.. c ., E ., 0> .. c: .. :;: .::- .; <J) ... E .. g> Ci. i ~ ~ ~ :t ~ 33 ..IIIIII...(- """"~~ Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association R.. ~ (',:~ \;ir-""" . !;:. \':_~ l.,-~ J "if it.:._ August 28, 2007 AUf! 2 A '1111'7 \iI ~ {.~~ MEMORANDUM CENTERVILLE, MN To: Safety Compliance Participants From: Mike Willetts, Director of Job Training and Safety Subject: 2007 -08 Safety Management Program Contract It is time to renew your safety management program contract. Since our group meeting, all requested changes have been made. There has been very little change from the budgets delivered at the earlier meeting. The contract amendments will cover October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2008, to coincide with MMUA's fiscal year. A copy of your group's budget and two copies of your contract amendment are enclosed. Please sign both contracts keeping one for your records and mailing the other to the address shown below. Please do not send payment at this time. You will be billed shortly after October 1. Mail your signed contract to: Rita Kelly, Finance Manager Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association 3025 Harbor Lane North, Suite 400 Plymouth, MN 55447-5142 If you have any concerns with the new contract, please contact me or Rita as follows: Mike Willetts: phone 763-746-0705 or e-mail willetts@mmua.org Rita Kelly: phone 763-746-0704 or e-mail rkelly@mmua.org Thank you for being part of the MMUA safety compliance groups. With this program and your support we have proven that working together as a group we can develop a safety program that is affordable and at the same time works. 31 3025 Harbor Lane North' Suite 400 . Plymouth, MN 55447-5142 . 763.551.1230 . 800.422.0119 (MN) . Fax 763.551.0459 . www.mmua.org ENCROACIJ~N1;' AQREEMENT . b~ A . AGREEMENT ("Agreement") made this ...!- day of {/'VCr . ~"if1 . by and between the CITY OF CENTERVILLE, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and .~ r J(tI-t. 5 Nt;L.$ #''''''; ("Landowner(s)"). RECITALS A. Landowners own in fee as joint tenants the real property situated in Anoka County, Minnesota, legally described as follows ("Subject Property''): (Insert legal description) [,r 1- (~K I I~v-<:oi) p~ GSr: 2.....,J A-P~i.r7 I"V I 7/9/ ~~ B. Landowners> desire to locate a fence partially within the right-of-way/drainage and utility easement(s) in their side~or both easement(s). Landowners seek permission from the City to encroach in the City's right-of-way/drainage and utility easement. NOW> THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, TIlE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City hereby grants Landowners permission to encroach into the City's right- of-way/drainage and utility easement for their Sl~},. r~( b9th easement(s) to the extent indicated on the CeRiHI11i1~ efi\lf\e, attached hereto as EXHIBIT "A", ~ 6>t.4 rJ 1 35 2. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed an abandonment, vacation or waiver of the City's interest in the right-of-way/drainage and utility easement(s). 3. Landowners, for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to defend, indemnifY and hold the City harmless from all costs and expenses, claims and liability, including attorney fees, relating to or arising out of the grant to Landowners of permission to encroach into the City's right-of-way/drainage and utility easement(s). Landowners further agree to indemnifY and hold the City harmless from any damage caused to the Subject Property as a result of maintenance of the City's right-of-way/drainage and utility easement(s), including any damage to the fence caused in whole or part by the encroachment into the City's right-of- way/drainage and utility easement(s). 4. The City does not warrant title or guarantee the continuing right of Landowners to maintain the fence in the City's right-of-way/drainage and utility easement(s). 5. Landowners may not replace the fence in the City's right-of-way/drainage and utility easement(s) if the fence is damaged to more than fifty percent (50%) of its fair market value, as measured immediately prior to the damage. 6. The City may direct removal of the fence, at the Landowners' sole cost and expense, upon thirty (30) days written notice if the City determines it has a use for the right-of- way/drainage and utility easement(s) and that the fence interfere with said use. 7. This Agreement shall run with the land and shall be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. 2 3& CITY OF CENTERVILLE By: Mary Capra, Mayor By: Teresa Bender, City Clerk LANDOWNERS BY:~ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. ) By: r~ ;??~ COUN1Y OF ANOKA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , ~ by and Mary Capra, Teresa Bender, Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City ofCenterville, a Minnesota a municipal corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ay of ..LAnI.c:.4-_ Joo1 ,~Y"'Q.5 (}.lI\e\ \(....i~ NtlSbt'\ . (insert names of individuals who stgne~ .l:::lu.~bc.-,Je-,....l Wit#.. (insert single person, husband and wife orlf), / DRAFTED BY CITY OF CENTERVILLE 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 ~. ..11 '" RHONDA J. MCKAY 'V;J!I Notary Public "M C .. Minnesota y ommlss:n Expires January 31, 2010 3 31 . -. FENC~ APPLICATION SKETCH - CITY OF CENTERVILLE Name _1d "" + ICILtS Jlfr..c.&~ Address 1('\ I ~~I\ ~ {)(. . Date .-tJ -.!U 6 i ALL SKETCHES MUST BE DRAWN TO SCALE and contain the following information: North Arrow, all abutting streets and alle)'s with street names, dimensions of lot or lots, all existing buildings on lots, all existing utility lines and easements, and distances from all pro rty lines. Crosshatch all existing buildings. Label property lines. Indicate North in the Circle ,v..... ~6.l~T ~-' f' P~/l.-IwC (}Dttf'JM ro~r -I:.. rr-r- _-:.:. ~.:-..:- - t::- -l( r p.... po''''' f"~,.u;. Ao.'P*<l i-.-.lJ , Ik: k p~pE41-'7 ~ I I fh-f""l"f u.4 .--' : r I V L-I1J1{z. I I I I +1 : ''E-I I.4r S fl.-Ill ~ . ,~ 8/.57 >,141 I I 'I ;i f 1Q.s1 I -... i ~I ..... i I i 'A- t \0- r t~ ~--r ,,, , \ I : ~ I i I I I IOI~ , r ,~~ r. "t--rJ! , , '<' fi- ~'m.,~ . , " I" G- - ~L ~rz.v..r..fL posr \ l ~ . \... ~t'0'S1 81.'5'7 ..-- c;::,OE ~lt- ~J .l---L-L-L-__ ~--/YtI~tJ Ot. ~ , ~ /" I -==-71.) - -- -="" ~ --31 Rug 23 07 03:56p Land Rights 763-241-2488 p.2 ~~-1 t.~ .~' ~~ ,-, GREAT RIVER E NElfC Y" 1 7845 East Highway 1 0 . P.O. Box 800 . Elk River. Minnesota 55330-0800 . 763.441-3121 . Fax 763-241-2366 August 23, 2007 Easement CH-AP-48 Tom and Kris Nelson 7191 Brian Drive Centerville, MN 55038 SUBJECT: PROPOSED FENCE WITHIN GREAT RIVER ENERGY EASEMENT Dear Mr. and Mrs. Nelson: This letter serves to advise you that you are permitted to construct and maintain fences within the area encumbered by the electric transmission line easement indicated above. Please be further advised that in the event that Great River Energy or any of its successors, assigns, contractors or agents would need to perform routine maintenance or reconstruction of the line, the fence would be subject to removal for that purpose. Sincerely, GREAT RIVER ENERGY ) , h(~ck UtL'v ~''- ~v"5- I ~,~ ,/ ) Rick Heuring Field Representative _....J?irect Dial (763) 241-2;3J? " E-~ail rheuring@grenergy'.com__~AX -<763) 241-6011. __,_. ww\v. GrcatRiverEn ergy.com A Touchstone Energy'" Cooperative ~~ 39 August 7, 2007 To: City ofCenterville Public Works Department Please consider this as my acceptance of - and written documentation of - the following: We are the homeowners of 7197 Brian Drive and our neighbor at 7191 Brian Drive wants to build a fence along our South property line (his North property line). We understand that the fence will be entirely on his property, but within 2'- 0' of the common property line, set back at least 1'-0' from said common property line. We agree to allow the fence to be located as stated above. , ~ jf~ EI naB. en 10 08-07-07 To city ofCenterville public works dept., Please consider this letter as my acceptance of - and written documentation of - the following: I am homeowner of7185 Brian dr. and my neighbor at 7191 Brian dr. wants to build a fence along my North property line (his South property line). I understand that the fence will be entirely on his property, but within 2'-0" of the common property line. I agree to allow the fence be located as stated above. t lOCMt1Y!7Q;{I'Q 6cJJ~ - J Dawn Ballantine 4! . \', ENCROACHMffiNTAGREEMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") made this ,Z7ttday of ~ ' 2PtJ? , by and between the CITY OF CENTERVILLE, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and ~A--&4/+~ ~~ ("Landowner(s)"). RECITALS A. Landowners own in fee as joint tenants the real property situated in Anoka County, Minnesota, legally described as follows ("Subject Property"): (Insert legal description) jit'P/,1 Md: / ~~ - /1~ '7;1(~ X~ B. Landowners' desire to locate a fence partially within the right-of-way/drainage and utility easement(s) in their side, rear yard or both easement(s). Landowners seek permission from the City to encroach in the City's right-of-way/drainage and utility easement. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City hereby grants Landowners permission to encroach into the City's right- of-way/drainage and utility easement for their side, rear yard or both easement(s) to the extent indicated on the Certificate of Survey attached hereto as EXHIBIT "A". 1 ;j~ 2. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed an abandonment, vacation or waiver of the City's interest in the right-of-way/drainage and utility easement(s). 3. Landowners, for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless from all costs and expenses, claims and liability, including attorney fees, relating to or arising out of the grant to Landowners of permission to encroach into the City's right-of-way/drainage and utility easement(s). Landowners further agree to indemnify and hold the City harmless from any damage caused to the Subject Property as a result of maintenance of the City's right-of-way/drainage and utility easement(s), including any damage to the fence caused in whole or part by the encroachment into the City's right-of- way/drainage and utility easement(s). 4. The City does not warrant title or guarantee the continuing right of Landowners to maintain the fence in the City's right-of-way/drainage and utility easement(s). 5. Landowners may not replace the fence in the City's right-of-way/drainage and utility easement(s) if the fence is damaged to more than fifty percent (50%) of its fair market value, as measured immediately prior to the damage. 6. The City may direct removal of the fence, at the Landowners' sole cost and expense, upon thirty (30) days written notice if the city determines it has a use for the right-of- way/drainage and utility easement(s) and that the fence interfere with said use. 7. This Agreement shall run with the land and shall be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. 2 .LjJ . . CITY OF CENTERVILLE By: Mary Capra, Mayor By: Teresa Bender, City Clerk LANDO~ ~ By:~ By:'--rn '\lit r;rM1 ReA ~ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTYOFANOKA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of ~ by and Mary Capra, Teresa Bender, Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, ofthe City ofCenterviIIe, a Minnesota a municipal corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTYOFANOKA ) ment was acknowledged before me this,t2!! day of ..ti - I. ..-J,.. . , (insert names 0 individuals who signe~ (insert single person husband and wi e or??). C -_.-V~~. Notary Public DRAFTED BY CITY OF CENTERVILLE 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 e..... TERESABENOER '. MOtNtYPl8JC-MNtaOTA ..,tr-r.'.If' flIhI.... 3t.2010 3 ;)1 August 17, 2008 To who it may concern: I give Charles Reinhardt permission to put a fence one foot off the property lin~ of 1723 Meadow Lane and 7008 Centerville Road. SinlelY, Barb Thompson 7008 Centerville Road 651-653-0470 )jf HY-LAND SURVEYING, LAND SURVEYORS P .A. @ N 8700 Jefferson Highway Osseo, Minnesota 55369 PHONE (763)493-5761 FAX (763)493-5781 INVOICE NO. F.B. NO. SCALE 1" 31.315 30' w E ~ur.....y .ors at..rljfit1tu ~ o - Denotes Iron Monument Set . - Denotes Iron Monument Found Sj) Q -81.99 N88'40'07"w~ NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE -_ EAST UNE OF LOT 1. BlOCK 1. - - NORTHERL Y EXTENSION OF THE WEST UNE OF LOT I, BLOCK 1. A I If"'\ nuu. I I 6 g r SUBp. 1\11"\ I'U.' 48 I 6 o o T ,. - -SOU1li UNE OF LOT 1 J, AUDITORS { SUBDlVlSlON NUMBER 48,PER I 1liE PLAT OF PAR/(VJEW. I I ....-10. WIDE ROAD EASEMENT I /{ 1,J.L \ I 1- L 22.~ I r\-r L.U I ~ - ...) ~ iq~/ z ~ / I J .... (J ~ ... Cl o ~ '" r--------l 5! DRAINAGE '" UllUTY EASEMENT 15 ~ I BLOSI( -I : 1 I , I PAR 1(' I , L, 38.0 11. o .., ,0 ~I :;) EXISTING ::l ~ N RESIDENCE ~ f, IT 14.1 I I I 1 I I 51 ~ 15 L----_____-1 I ~ ~ I ~ , I V r C. IAI " 15.0 l"- ce ~ 1-1" ~~ q~1'." "'~.... " '\ S88'40 07"E":-.wAU<,' '., C<WOlrn: CUJlll MEADOW LANE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All of Lot 1, Block 1, PARK VIEW and that part of the South 100 feet of LOT 13, AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NUMBER 48 REVISED, ANOKA COUNTY. MINNESOTA, Lyin between the Northerly extensions of the East and West lines of said Lot 1, Bock 1, according to the recorded plots thereof. Subject to easements of record. This suney Is eertIlIed only to the obow named person 0<" persons and no! to oull_t own.,., mortgog.. Of' tiVe insurers. llle b~lm~~~~= ~':or'r~~.J~::o o~~:t'o~~ ~1~~;t~..!'t.'Ovlded by client. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, ond that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Surveyed by us this ~ day of August . 20 07 Signed ;)~ Page 1 of 1 Teresa Bender From: Kim Stephan [kstephan@centervillemn.com} Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 9:45 AM To: TBender@Centervil/emn.com Subject: RE: recognition plaque ----Original Message----- From: Seeley Suzanne [mailto:skseeley@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, september 06, 2007 12:56 PM To: Kim Stephan Subject: recognition plaque Hi, Kim, Here's the specs that P&R agreed to last night for Trevor's plaque: . 3/4" X 3" nameplate . with satin SILVER finish, . silver screws, . and three lines that read as follows: Landscaping by - TREVOR WEIGEL - Eagle Project - 2007 The font should be Times New Roman with mixed case on the 1st and 3rd lines, ALL CAPS on the 2nd line and centered as shown. The web site I was looking at is: wcp-nm.com - a Colorado-based company. Tel. # 1-877-373- 1212. Here's a link to the page I was looking at: http://www.wcp- nm.com/osc/catalog/product info.php?products id=413 Thanks for asking Theresa to order/pay for this. If you need more info, let me know. -Suzanne Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase. This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 9/7/2007 11 tervi{{e <Estabfishct.{ 1857 1880 ~ain Street, CenterViffe, ~% 55038 651-429-3232or'l'4J(651-429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #07-XXX A RESOLUTION ELECTING TO PARTICIPATE IN THE ANOKA COUNTY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES WHEREAS, the City of Centerville is an Anoka County municipality, and as such is a rapidly growing and important segment of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Region, made up of a rich variety of vital, desirable communities; and WHEREAS, the City of Centerville City Council believes that the residents would realize many benefits from expansion of the Anoka County tax base, including but not limited to; the creation of local job opportunities, wider sharing of tax burden, and access to enhanced infrastructure, services, and retail and business activities; and WHEREAS, in order to expand the local tax base, the Anoka County Board of Commissioners had indicated an interest in fostering a regional approach to economic development in Anoka County; and WHEREAS, in 2007 a statutorily formed citizens exploratory committee recommended to the Board of Commissioners that the Anoka County Housing and Redevelopment Authority be granted the powers of an economic development authority; and WHEREAS, on June 12, 2007, the Anoka County Board of Commissioners, after fulfilling the statutory requirements, did authorize their Housing and Redevelopment Authority to exercise the powers of an economic development authority; and WHEREAS, MN Stat. 469.1082 requires that a municipality shall, declare -If its willingness, by resolution, to join the county in its economic development activities, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA THAT: 1. Hereby declares its support of Anoka County and its countywide economic development objectives and activities. 2. Elects to participate in Anoka County Housing and Redevelopment Authority economic development activities. ATTEST: CITY CLERK. MAYOR 19 City of Centerville 2008 Preliminary General Fund Budget September 12, 2007 Prepared By: John Meyer Finance Director Prepared by jmeyer 9/7/2007 Page 1 &J City of Centerville Narrative for 2008 Proposed Budget September 12, 2008 Attached is the proposed Year 2008 General Fund Budget for the City of Centerville. This report is intended to disclose all assumptions used in calculating the proposed budget and explain any significant variances from last year. The following assumptions were made in calculating the proposed budget: Revenues: Tax Levv The general tax levy was increased by $69,700 for additional spending which is an increase of 3.55% . At this proposed levy amount, estimated tax capacity figures indicate that a tax rate will not change from 45.74 in 2008. This tax capacity is based on updated county data that enumerated a increase in the city's tax capacity and an decrease in the city's contribution to area wide spending. Local Government Aid The city will receive $22,900 in focal government aid in 2008. In 2007, the city received $23,560. Licenses and Permits Licenses and Permits revenues will decline slightly because of a change in the housing market. Fines and Forfeits Fines and forfeits have been stable. Interest Earninas Interest earnings will decline because of a smaller investment portfolio. Assessments Assessment receipts will decline in 2008 because of fewer assessment receivables. Expenditures: Salaries and Benefits The following assumptions were made in calculating salaries and benefits for the 2008 budget: + 3% structure increase (COLA); + 4% step increase for eligible employees; + A legislative mandated increased employer contribution rate to PERA; + The budget reflects additional salary for part time help in Public Works + Allocations were changed to more accurately reflect actual time spent, resulting in slight differences in distributions across departments; + Overtime was calculated at 5% of the annual salary for the three existing Public Works employees; + $70 per employee per month increase in health insurance contribution, in accordance with the union contract. Insurance rates are expected to rise by 9- 12 % in January 2008 Police Administration The 2008 budget amount of $704,000 from the Centennial Lakes Police Department is reflected in the budget. This is an increase of 8.47%. & Fire Protection The 2008 budget amount of $107,000 from the Centennial Fire Department is reflected in the budget. This is an increase of 4.12%. The budget also includes $ 95,000 in pass through fire relief aid. Parks and Recreation The parks and recreation includes operating funds for the city's $8,000 contribution to the National Sports Center for the potential ice time financing gap. In addition to operating funds for the Parks and Recreation budget, $25,000 in funds are provided for debt service on the hidden spring park loan. Economic Develooment The economic development budget includes $2,000 for the Anoka County Partners commitment. City Festival The City Festival budget includes an estimated $17,000 appropriation from the City plus a proposed $3,000 pass-through donation from gambling funds. Transfers Out This line item includes a proposed $102,000 transfer to the 2004 Municipal Street Debt Service Fund to cover the City's portion of the street project obligation, $400 transfer for 2000 Street Assessments and $77,200 for lease payments on the Joint Police Station. In 2008, the city will call the GO Improvements Bonds of 2001 reducing debt by $600,000. Caoital Outlay Capital outlay in the amount of $148,000 is available in the 2008 proposed budget for capital needs such as election equipment, a copy machine, one vehicle replacement for public works, seal coating and a contribution to park & recreation. I wish to thank the City Administrator, Public Works Director, City staff, Anoka County staff and the City Council for their patience and help with the preparation of this budget. I am available to answer any questions you may have regarding the proposed budget or budget process. Thank you for your patience and understanding. Respectfully Submitted: Approved By: Jo~j.t\, W. Me{1er Finance Director Dallas Ulrsoj.t\, City Administrator 6~ CITY OF CENTERVILLE General Fund Proposed 2008 Budget Actual Final Preliminary Percent Change 2006 Budget 2007 Budget 2008 Budget 2007 to 2008 Revenues: Property Taxes 1,809,431.00 1,915,900.00 1,985,600.00 3.64% MV Homestead Credit Cut (84,431.00) Other Taxes & Assessments 84,500.00 46,000.00 50,000.00 8.70% Licenses & Permits 195,000.00 160,000.00 170,000.00 6.25% Building Inspection 168,000.00 110,000.00 135,000.00 22.73% Fines & Forfeits 30,000.00 40,000.00 35,000.00 -12.50% Intergovernmental 110,000.00 117,000.00 120,000.00 2.56% Fire Relief Aid 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 0.00% Charges for Services 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00% Interest Earnings 40,000.00 58,000.00 60,000.00 3.45% Miscellaneous Revenues 10,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 0.00% Refunds & Reimbursements 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 0.00% Fund Balance 0.00 0.00 Total Revenues 2,200,500.00 2,357,900.00 2,441,600.00 3.55% Expenditures: Current General Government Mayor and Council 23,000.00 35,000.00 35,000.00 0.00% Elections 5,000.00 7,000.00 0.00% Planning & Zoning 10,000.00 20,000.00 10,000.00 -50.00% Administration 324,600.00 385,000.00 403,000.00 4.68% Financial Administration 18,000.00 18,000.00 13,500.00 -25.00% Assessing 20,000.00 18,000.00 19,500.00 8.33% Legal 80,000.00 65,000.00 70,000.00 7.69% City Hall 38,000.00 40,000.00 40,000.00 0.00% Total General Government 518,600.00 581,000.00 598,000.00 2.93% Public Safety Police Protection 577,376.00 649,000.00 704,000.00 8.47% Fire Protection 186,000.00 194,000.00 202,000.00 4.12% Building Inspection 155,000.00 158,000.00 160,000.00 1.27% Electrical Inspection 9,000.00 9,000.00 7,000.00 -22.22% Civil Defense 4,000.00 4,000.00 3,400.00 -15.00% Animal Control 1,500.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00% Other Protective Services 0.00 2,100.00 0.00% Total Public Safety 932,876.00 1,016,000.00 1,080,500.00 6.35% Public Works Public Works 170,000.00 175,000.00 180,000.00 2.86% Engineering Services 15,000.00 25,000.00 20,000.00 -20.00% Recycling 5,000.00 5,000.00 6,000.00 20.00% Streets 80,000.00 80,000.00 83,000.00 3.75% Street Lighting 27,000.00 30,000.00 32,000.00 6.67% Total Public Works 297,000.00 315,000.00 321,000.00 1.90% 53 Culture and Recreation Park/Rec. Committee 2,500.00 3,000.00 4,000.00 33.33% Park/Rec. Programs 10,000.00 15,500.00 16,000.00 3.23% Park Maintenance 65,000.00 67,000.00 68,000.00 1.49% Total Culture and Recreation 77,500.00 85,500.00 88,000.00 2.92% Economic Development Economic Development - EDA 6,500.00 6,200.00 6,500.00 4.84% Frozen Fete Des Lacs Business Directory 2,500.00 -100.00% EDA - Business Promotion 3,000.00 0.00% EDA - Miscellaneous 1,700.00 1,500.00 -11.76% Anoka County Partners 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00% Cougar Cash Total Economic Development 6,500.00 6,200.00 6,500.00 4.84% Unallocated Refunds & Reimbursements 0.00 City Summer Festival 20,000.00 25,000.00 20,000.00 -20.00% Total Miscellaneous 20,000.00 25,000.00 20,000.00 -20.00% Total Current Expenditures 1,852,476.00 2,028,700.00 2,114,000.00 4.20% Capital Outlay General Government 42,124.00 5,000.00 23,000.00 360.00% Public Safety 0.00 5,000.00 Streets and Highways 100,000.00 113,000.00 100,000.00 -11.50% Culture and Recreation 25,000.00 25,000.00 -100.00% Total Capital Outlay 167,124.00 148,000.00 123,000.00 -16.89% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,019,600.00 2,176,700.00 2,237,000.00 2.77% EXCESS (DEFICIT) OF REVENUES 180,900.00 181,200.00 204,600.00 12.91 % OVER EXPENDITURES OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.00 Operating Transfer Out (180,900.00) (181,200.00) (204,600.00) 12.91% GO Assessment 2000 (400.00) (400.00) (400.00) 0.00% GO Improvement 2004B (102,000.00) (102,000.00) (102,000.00) 0.00% Joint Police Station Lease (78,500.00) (78,800.00) (77,200.00) -2.03% Hidden Spring Park Loan 0.00 0.00 (25,000.00) TOTAL OTHER FINANCING (180,900.00) (181,200.00) (204,600.00) 12.91 % SOURCES (USES) EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF 0.00 0.00 0.00 REVENUE AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES OVER EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES PREPARED BY: JOHN MEYER, FINANCE DIRECTOR $I 2008 Projected Revenue Sources Property Taxes Other Taxes & Assessments Licenses & Permits Fines & Forfeits Intergovernmental Charges for Services Interest Earnings Miscellaneous Refunds & Reimbursements 1,985,600.00 50,000.00 170,000.00 35,000.00 120,000.00 2,000.00 60,000.00 15,000.00 4,000.00 Total Revenue 2,441,600.00 2008 Projected Revenue Sources 0% 1% 2% EI Property Taxes . Other Taxes & Assessments 0 Licenses & Permits 0 Fines & Forfeits . Intergovernmental EI Charges for Services . Interest Earnings Ell Miscellaneous . Refunds & Reimbursements 5~ 2008 Projected Expenditures General Government Public Safety Public Works Culture & Recreation Economic Development Advertising & Promotion Capital Outlay General Fund Debt Service Total Expenditures $ 598,000.00 $ 1,080,500.00 $ 321,000.00 $ 88,000.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 123,000.00 $ 204,600.00 $ 2,441,600.00 2008 Projected Expenditures 4% 13% 45% III General Government . Public Safety o Public Works o Culture & Recreation . Economic Development IIIAdvertising & Promotion . Capital Outlay Ell General Fund Debt Service .:;;-1; 000000 000000 tOOOOOO 00 Ll'iciciLl'ici"-: 000 L!) I'--("i)N 00 00) ..- ..- N..- 000000 000000 0)00000 I'--Ll'ic.ocicir--:oi g.....vtOV"-1'-- NO) ..- ..- ..- 0) ("i)tO V to 0)- 00 ~oo ..- 0000 0000 0000 L!)- ci ci c.o O)("i)..-L!) ..- ..- 0000("i) I'-- 00L!)0("i)..- 00 000("i) 00 L!)ci"-:ciNc.or--: 00 ..-N..-O) 01'-- N ..- N..- UJ C Z W ~ .... W ::J Z W > W ~ l/) ...... c: a> E l/) "t:l lfl <i: ~~ .19 l/)<(Ellm a> ccj Q) '- E Xl/)a..~c: 1-l1l a> ciS 0 .... X l.1.. Q) >- l1l Vl _'" > tl-Q)guO a>....VlVlO'l.... a.a>C: ....a> o..c:2:l~2..c: c:o::JiI:.55 ro ...... c: a> E c: "0 .... a> <: > 0 OJ L- a> ...... E l/) 0 ...... 0 '(jj to 't: ..- 0 V U. V_ ~ N l/) a> c: u: o o 0) I'-- L!) ("i) N o o L{) o o N N o o o 00 V ..- N 1'--000 L-..-OOO a>00000 ..c:r--:c.ooi"-: (0)1.01'--00 ("i)00 0 ("i)000 ("i) 0 00 - - - - to 0 I'-- 0 ~~~N ~ ~ ~ ~ 0000 0000 0000 NciciLl'i N("i)V("i) ~ l/)~ ~ E c: L- a> a> uo.. ::J 0000 1.0000 00000 - - ... - 01.000 ..-0) to I'-- N-r-~~ LO <0 t- CO 0000 o 0 0 0 N N N N IiB.OO CD ..c 6 "0 <( ro e Q) E c: Gi > 0 Ol Gi :g tl :@ 0 u. oI:l '" Q) c: Ll: '" CIl "0 Q) c: e Q) ~ :J 0 Q) tl (J) :J "E c: Q) CD > c.. Q) 0:: oI:l '" Q) '" c: Q) 0 :.J a> :::J c: a> 1.0 to I'-- 00 > a> 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 c::: 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNN N 0 0 0 0 0 ro ci ci ci ci ci ...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO 0 LO. o. LO l- N N SJBIIOa ~l/)Oo) l/)c;OtO a>a>o xE"- l1l l/) I- l/) m a> E ~ 0<( 00 00 00 to- 0- V 1.0 100.......00 XOMOO ro o~.'<t"~ O"I~ \O~ 1-00"11./)1./) >-00.......00 -er--000"l0"l Q) ,...-4....,...-4.... ~....... a. e a.. oI:l III CIle ~ Q) III E I- CIl <u ~ ..c III 5~ III ~ III I- >. t: Q) a. E c.. 51 0000000 0000000 OIOOOIOOCO ~cOci~cO<<s~.,f OO>CONCONNO NIOO("') ......N ...... tf)- tf)- tf)- tf)- tf)- tf)- tf)- 0000000 0000000 OOOIONON "~c.OU)a.O~cOT- gCO............CO("')'Q"CO NIOO("') ............ tf)- tf)- tf)- tf)- tf)- tf)- tf)- OCOOOO'Q"O Ol'-OOONO COCOOIOIO......O> (DcONr--:r--:<<sr--:ci O......("')O>I'-NCOCO OIOO>N ............ N tf)- tf)- ffl- tf)- ffl- ffl- ffl- ("')'Q"I'-COOOO ("')CON CO 01'-0 COCO'Q" 0("') COO ... ci ~ cO N ..n r--: N- ::.:0>00> I'-N 100 O'Q"O>N N...... N tf)- tf)- tf)- tf)- tf)- tf)- tf)- I/) "D C e l- e :J .... :s c Q) c. >< w ...... c: "E c: Q) (J) 0 E E ~ g- ~ ~ ~ c3~~~~ Iii c?l ~ ~ .~ <ug~3g C::.D.o::o ,<R :J :J :J U vo..a..UW Q) u .~ Q) Vl ...... .0 Q) o >--0 ~c: :J :J OLL. Iii~ ~Q) Q.c: ell Q) U19 w <.> .i: w (f) :i5 w 0 "'C (J) 0 0 0 0 u c:: c (.) 0000 ::> :J .~ o 0> N. CO_ Uo u.. n; Iii (J) NO ...... 'Q" to c C/) 0 co co 0 w .... ...... ...... ...... N (J (J) - c: .0 (J) (J) <.9 0 tf)- tf)- tf)- tf)- ,., 0 'Q" 00 .!!! Iii I'- N 0 0 :; ell co ...... 00 0 - ]j . 0.. +:i 1'-1'- CO'~ ell :J .0. lOCO 'Q" N '" uO N ...... ...... ...... 0 tf)- tf)- tf)- tf)- o o CO ...... 'Q" 'Q"- N tf)- I'- o en 0> 10 ("') N tf)- CO o 10 N o N N tf)- o o o co 'Q" ...... N tf)- (/) (J) .... :J ~ "'C c:: (J) a. x UJ Iii - o I- (.)COOOO ._ Q) 0 0 0 0 EE~~N~ o a. 10 CO ...... CO 5.QNN("')N (.) Q) UJ iii Otf)-tf)-tf)-tf)- COOOO COOOO 010100 N- r--: Lri" cO I'-I'-COCO ~5 ~i5 :J Q) _ L.. S~ Ucr:: tf)- tf)- tf)- tf)- (/)1'-000 ~NOOO O'Q"OOO S cO 1'-- Lri" ......- 0> 0>...... N .S:2 NN ("')("') :0 ::J a..tf)-tf)-tf)-tf)- z-~~gg Q)COCOOIO ro~Nu:iO (I) 0 ("')...... CO .S:2 0> 0> 0 0 :0 :J a.. tf)- ffl- tf)- ffl- MOOO ......MOOO C:~~OO Iii.... EQ) 0 ro .....~ ro 0'1.....000'1 ~EVLOLOLO Q) ~ 19 0 19 ~~~~ 10 CO I'-CO 0000 0000 NNNN III "Cl C (I) ... I- (I) ... = ~ "Cl C (I) C. >< W 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .:. 8 ci ci ci ci ci 0 0 0 0 0 "'- 0_ '" <0 " N ., ;; V> V> V> V> SJelloa c: w E a. o 0; > " o <.> E o c o <.> L1J c .2 16 ~ ~ ~ :~ 06 U l" ~ .2 :; o .. " 5 ::: g :c ::> a. ,., CD ro (f) .!< :c ::> a. c: w E E " > o {J ~ " c " {J .51 2 Q) co co CD 2 0::: 0::: ro Cll >< >< a::: 0:: Cll Cll >< Xt-t-Cll Cll~Ot- t- c: 0 Qj c~.c.r:. (3 8 ~ 5 + + + I c: ~ ~ o o o o (0 o o C> o l{) 000 o 0 0 o 0 0 000 """ C") N JaqwnN '<t .. I' co!!) g'<t N 0>01' CONO C")...-N c-iro!!) C")C") co C") .. '<t CO...- ON ~...- '<to>0l' I'CONO !!)C")"'-N .....'<tNcoui o C")C") o N co C") '<t ..... ...- ON 0"'- N 0000 I' ...- N C") "<3:I'NCO OCOO<O :g!!)C")'<t o N o ('I) o CD CO 0('1) 0"'- N 0000 '<tCO"'-O CO!!)'<t!!) ~NC")I''''''': O!!)C")C") N o ('I) .,,('1) 0"'- OM N ...- II) 'C C ! I- eI) .... ftI 0:: >< ftI I- Q) -(J)(J) Q)CO'lO..... _a:::0:::1U COx 0::: a:::CO~>< >< I- I- IU CO ~_ l- I- c 0 "- z.:JE~ .- 0 U..... ()()UlO o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 . CO o o N "- o o N ro Q) CD >- o o N l{) o o N 0000) X COMC")!!) ~2~~~~ (ijCOMMMN Ocr:"f'"""'~~-r- I- x ggg~ ~Q)"'-!!)CON "-m""":I'CO!!) ~a::: (5 x CO I- Q) Om ~a::: u CJ) x CO I- Q) ~- c CO :Ja::: o () x CO Q) 1-- >.CO ~a::: () .& ro 0::: >< ~ 19 ~ 0000 !!)...-NN CO'<tN...- <01'0 CO C") ('I) '<t M 0000) I'CO"'-CO I' !!) I' M uiMCON C") M M M 000("11 ...-V'I'\D NOO"<3:~ --rNOU'l !!)U'l!!)V' " !!)~~CO gooo NNN~ II) 'C C ! l- S ftI 0::: >< ftI .- S o .- ..! .~ s c eI) o .... o (3 2 Cll 0:: x Cll t- ro "5 t- + (0 C") '<I: ...... N ...... o o o c:i """ ...- o o o Lri C") ...- o 0 0 000 o 0 0 c:i Lri c:i c") N N ...- ...... JaqwnN o o o Lri ...- ...... . co o o N l'- o o N CD o o N LO o o N o o o c:i ...- ...... ... III Gl >- c o +:0 co E "- .E c Q) ::0 ..!!! .co > co >. +:; c Q) "- ..... :J U C o "'0 Q) If) co .0 Q) - co E +:0 If) Q) c co .!a Q) - ~ x co - (ij - o - " co o o N 4'9 Ul ~ W C) o ::l III a z ::l II. W 1/1 ii2 lL 0:: W ~ Z W all ~ () w ..., ~ lL ..J ~ it <C ~ () ..J W ~ ~ I!!ffi z Ul ~lii ~~ ~ l!!l o ~ "C c: ::l II. N Q) g ~ rJ) "C c: ::l ~ g 15 3: "C ., o a: 0> ~~ ., '" " ., CD '" ~ ! ::l :I: Q) " .~ Q) <Xl ~ ~ Q) CJ Q) " .~ Q) CD rJ) ;1; :c Q) CJ Q) " .~ Q) '" en ;1; :E Q) CJ Q) " .~ c% ~ :E Q) CJ Q) " .~ Q) .... en ~ :E Q) CJ Q) " .~ Q) N en ;;; :E Q) CJ :E Q) CJ l'l 0> a g a. E .0 ...., c: o a; ~~ " ~ ! ~ " c: c: ::l " II. II. a a 0 a o 0 0 a o 0 a 0 o a a 0 o 0 a 0 ll"illicici aNN f'-., M fA-EA-EA-~ 8 8 8 8 o 0 0 0 888 8 ariLri'cill'i .... N M N Efl * 69- 69- ~ " c: ~ > ~ 0:: '" '" ~ <IJ E .~ ~.~ ~ en Q) .!? (]) III r/) m g' U'l (L~~cn~m'~=' ~~~~~<cwl en c (/) ~ C'l 1ii ~~~Q)~8 ~ I-~~E():r: ~ 000 000 g g g 00'" N"ui M '" '" '" 000 000 o 0 ci 000 o 0 ~ 000 CD '" '" '" 8 8 00 8 g N '" '" 8 8 o 0 8 g N '" '" o 0 o 0 ci ci o 0 o '" N '" '" o 0 o 0 o ci o 0 ~q ~ '" '" g g c:i c:i o 0 0'" o M '" '" o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o. '" N '" '" 15 en '(:5 Q,) Q) Q; t%~ o o o o o o N ... '" o o o o o or; ... M '" o o o o '" N '" o o o o '" N '" o o o o '" N '" o o o o o ID '" o o o o '" ,..: ... '" o o o o '" o M '" o o o o "'. N '" o o o o <Xi .... '" '" ~ " c: ~ > ~ 0:: 1; r= a 0 a 0 0 0 o a a a 0 0 ci 0 0 0 0 ci a 0 0 0 a 0 o a 0 000 ~~ g- ~. 8~ L() g- N tR- (;lit 'h tR- tR- tR- 000000 000000 a ci 0 ci ci c:i 000000 000000 Il'iciciciLOIli ..... .q- C")..q- LO Efl-tR-Eh~E09-Eh .. ! ~ '6 c: &. .. w '" Q) Ol m .<= ~ rn 0 Q) Q) o/l c: Q) '" Q) Ii. Q) CD (ij 0 C c: cd.~cn'~ ~~ .~ cn ,g! (f) ID .~ 2 !~lg~!~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 000 000 c:i 0 an o 0 N a 0_ .q- 0.... CD '" '" '" 000 000 ci c:i '" o 0 N 00'" 0- ..j CD CD '" '" '" 000 000 c:i c:i an o 0 N 00... c....i r--: o .... '" '" '" o 0 o 0 d c:i '" '" .... ... rici ... M '" '" '" ::l Ol 0 c: Q) .~ ~ .f;; iU g> .~ w::;; >- ~ .~ o Q; 2 (fJ 'c.. :c ~ .3 o o o '" N '" o o o '" N '" o 0 o 0 a ..0 o N o ... or; o '" Q) Q) Ii. C Q) Ol '" <c ~ (ij ~ ~ o o o o o o N ... '" o o o o o or; ... M '" o o o '" N '" o o o '" N '" o o u1 N ... or; o '" '" '" o o .,.; N ... ,..: .... '" o o .,.; N ... ..,: .... CD '" o o u1 N ... en .... '" 8 g N ..,: .... '" .. ! ~ '6 c: &. .. w 1; r= '" '" o o o '" N N '" o o o '" N N '" s- o u1 N 0> N o '" o o o o o CD. '" o o o o '" ,..: ... '" s- o u1 N 0> ID ~ '" s- o .,.; N 0> N '" ~ '" s- o u1 N M. e '" s- o o o N ..,: t;. '" Q) E o " .E '" c: :;:; l! Q) Q, o '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" o o ci o o N o '" o o o o N ,..: .... '" t! .! .. c: l! ~ o o o o o. '" o o o 8 g '" o o o '" N N '" o o o '" N. N '" s- o u1 N 0>. N o '" o o o o o. CD '" o o ci o '" ,..: ... '" s- o .,.; N 0>. ~ '" s- o u1 N 0> N. '" ~ '" o o u1 .... CD '" o o o o o ri ~ ~ is ~ " c: .. c: ii: '" .. E o " .E ~ z ~ .. >- .. ::Ii: c: .<= o ..., ;.:. III " ~ :;; Q, ! lL d/). ~ oz f3:5 zQ. z.... -z :lEw w~:IE :: .J w 0 .J> N -0 >0:: ffi Q. S "":IE 0 z _ N W.J (.)~ 11.- OQ. ~~ o t-.. C C (\I 0) ..... <- ~ "0 ~ c:: Q) E 'c:( s s III ~ :;::: => S !2- -0-0-0 C C C :::J :::J :::J LLLLLL CiiCiiCii CD Q) Q; c c c Q) Q) Q) C>C>C> o o o LO ...... EA- o o O. LO ...... EA- o o C!. LO EA- 00 00 , O. O. LOOO ...... EA- EA- EA- EA- o o o LO' EA- EA- 0000 0000 0000 LOLO cO 0 N...... N 'V EA- EA- EA- EA- c:: o :;:; ~ C;) '1: ~ 'c:( ~ eCii ~ ~:r: ClQ)Q.Z' Q. c '5 0'- =>:c ....<.It.ff.9 Q) I1l '5:2gg Q. ~ ,- '- Ec:t5'Ei oo..9:!-o oow<t: III -0 Q) Q) <.l o .... a.. LL E: Q) Cii (/) >. t Q) Q. o Ii o o C!. o N 'V EA- o o o LO ...... EA- o o O. LO ...... EA- o o C!. LO N 'V EA- o o o M N EA- o o o LO EA- o o o. 00 (!) 'V EA- c:: ,2 ~ ..... '" '1: ~ 'c:( - ~ .2 ~ C/) -0 ~ 'E E-g-g c>8~~ ~___EE OOEE 000 ~~oo oC>oo WlllWW WOWW 0000 o o o ci 'V I""- EA- o o o ci (!) N EA- o o C!. o o N EA- EA- EA- 000 000 o. o. o. 00 OJ 00 LO C') N N LO EA- EA- EA- o 0 o 0 0.. 0 o 0' o 0 N N EA- EA- EA- EA- 0000 000 0 000 0 o 00" . cri o 00 LO C') 'VNN OJ EA- EA- EA- EA- c;; III <t: e Q) E Q. o Qi > Q) o u51ii III III <t:<t: CC Q) Q) E E Q.Q. o 0 QiQi > > Q) Q) 00 1: Q) E g. ~ Q) a ~ '1: ::J E E o o I cc e Q)Q) ~5iKK Q.EoO .2 Q. Qi Qi ~~~~ -o>Q)-g Q)~O:::O::: 0:::-01""-00 oc~~ 3: 0 <.l <.l I- a.. .2.2 , Q) E OJ OJ 16 V'J.... _ -... .,...,. ~.9~~.2 a..(/)WW~ C/) o o q, o 'V I""- EA- o o q, o (!) N EA- o o C!. o o N - c:: Q) E g. ~ Q) a ~ '~ ~ <3 ...-... .-.. .-. .-. .- ';ft.~cf!.rf!.rf!. LOLOLOLOLO 1""-1""-1""-1""-1""- --------- ccccc I1l I1l I1l I1l III ~ t5t5t5t5t5~ WWWWW:;:' I-I-I-I-I-c .-. .- .-.. .-.-. co cf!.;f!.'Cf??ft.~C5 LOLOIt)It) It) NNNNNW --------...- -0-0-0-0-0-0-0 C C C C C C C :::J :::J :::J :::J :::J :::J :::J LLLLI.LI.LI.LI.LI.L ~~~~~~~ m rn Co co ro Co ro a.. 0..0.. 0..0.. a.. a.. -0 C :::J-o ~~ c: It) ~ :::J NQ)I.L ~c~ I.L Q) Iii C>C>o.. o o , o. It) I""- EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA- 0000000 0000000 0000000 00' t..: 1""-' cO LO LO LO ......C')OO......NI""-N ...... EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA- 00 00 '00 LOLO I""- N EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA- EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA- 00 00 '00 LOLO N'V EA- EA- EA- EA- EA- 00000000 00000000 '00000000 cO"":"":cOLOOLOLO ......C')OO......NIt)I""-'V ...... ...... EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA-EA- c:: ,2 10 ~ <.l Q) a:: "0 c:: co ~ rf. c, c C -000 CD UU~ g> ,~ 2 2 Iii 'Ci) -:;: en en c.. Q) III U C C Q) ceQ):::J 88-0 ~ 50>-0 Q)Q)~ !1.. 3:~<t:w 0:::0:::<.l Q) 0Q)f:5i 'V'V:2 - -0 c 0 C> ............ ,- '0 lIl:::JN :r::r:~ "'" .2?:r:0- A'A'.... "ffi G -en Ci)Ci)1- ....J3l.9.9~.9 OOe ':::J~ Q) Iii~ Q)..c..c c c:r:olftS""'....:::J:'.::::'.:::o wwGl1lc 3: 3::;::: ~ Cla......J'Ea.. Q) Q) Q) III Q..5 ~ ~ I1l .m ~ 1ii 1ii ~ '5 E 0 "0 III '0 f: ,5 .5 5i WO"Iii:2 I1l m:2o'E'EO::: ~:>lIlQ)..c11l ~:>....J:Eo......JNgg~ ~.mEEEEg><.l<.lc e ~~e~e_e_e 0.9.9 ~ Cl 0 ~ ~ Cii ~ .!E. '~ ~ 5i .~ '~ '~ '~ .~ ~ '~ -g 0..0:::1-1-1-1-1-1-1-0::: o o o. It) I""- EA- o o o. It) 00 C') EA- o o o. o o ...... EA- EA- o o o. o I""- EA- o o o It) It) LO EA- c:: ~ co ~ <.l Q) a:: "0 c:: I1l ~ co a.. ~ .2 .Q ::J C/) ~ Q) ....J :E Q) o o 0 o 0 I""- l""- I""- ,....- I""- I""- EA- EA- o 0 o 0 CC!. (!) I""- ,....- I""- I""- EA- EA- o 0 o 0 'V. 'V I""- ,....- I""- I""- EA- EA- o 0 o 0 N N 1""-' ,....- I""- I""- EA- EA- o 0 o 0 00 00, 00 00 I""- I""- EA- EA- o 0 o 0 o. o. ...... ...... ...... ...... C') C') EA- EA- 1: Q) ~ co Q. Q) a Q) ,5:1 & c ,2 1ii V5 Q) .S:1 "0 a.. c '0 ..., 1: Q) ~ co Q. Q) a Q) ,S:1 & ~ .2 .Q ::J C/) /t;/ Ul Cll "iii CI) ~ Cll a. e "0 C a.. ::J "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 =a LL "0 L- ~ Ul C C C C C C C C "0 Cll C C C "0 ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J - ::J Cll Cll Cll LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL C co Cll LL ::J ::J ::J Cll C :::J ~ E Ul Ul Ul E ::J "iii "iii li! "iii "iii li! "iii "iii LL Ul "iii !!2 !!2 !!2 Ul LL L- L- L- L- L- L- L- E Ul L- Ul L- Cll Cll Cll Cll Cll Cll Cll Cll Cll Cll C1l "0 "0 "0 Cll C1l C C C C C C C C 1;i L- C C C C 1;i 0 Ul Ul Cll Cll C1l Cll Cll Cll C1l C1l Ul Cll 0 0 0 ~ <9 0000000 ~ CiS <(0 CO aHD ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 q 0 0 o. q o. 0 q o. ..... L() LIi LIi L() 0 0 0 0 r-: C') C') 0 0 ~ L() L() .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ u. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 q q q (I) ci 0 0 0 r-: ...... ...... C') C') ..... ..... ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ u. 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 q 0 0 00 o. 0 q 0 0 ..,. L() LIi LIiLIi 0 ci 0 LIi LIi N ...... C') C') N N ..... "<l: '<to N ...... N ~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ u. 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 o. 0 q o. 0 00 0 N oi Ol ci 0 ...... LIiLIi ...... a) C') C') Ol .....N Ol (I) tOL() N.. Cl)~ .... ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ u. 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 I OL()OOLO O. o. 0 ClQ~ LIi LIi LIi~LIici~ C') 0 ci .... '<ttO ,.... C') C') 0 ...... an ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ u. 0 0 000000 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 000000 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 OOL()OOLO I q O. o. 00000 o. 0_ LIi LIi -.i.n~LIici~ ....... 0 0 LIi~ciLIiLIi to .... N...... '<ttO '<t L{) L() NOlO.......N .... Cl) ...... .... ...... '<to L()tOL{) N.. ..... C') Iri' ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L- .9 (,) C1l a. Ul .E 01 C :2 '5 co L- .E Cll 13 :c ~ ::g ~ Cll ~ M 0.. Cll a::: ,(,) :a :::J Cl.. ~ ~ ~ .(,) :a & L- o '0 C1l L- Ul(5 -l<:~Ul (,)o-l<: ~ 2~C5 CC I-.~~ g~ ~ ::c .~ LL '0 C1l a::~::c ~~~ Q),-::JE 10)0. E>.E ~ ~ c.5 E co~o 01- Cll"O ...J~-e~E:=C1l _CllClla..ECll::J::: 01313 (,)COCl) -c .r::.'- .r::.'- Cll ~ co Ul Ul Ul~a.-l<:-l<: C1l Cll C1l co .u C1l L- L- E>>.5~a:::gg C1lCllC1l L->> (,)(,)(,)co1;io(,)(,) .!2 .!2 .!2 (,) (,) - .- .- a.a.a..c.c(,)::C::C C1l C1l C1l 0 0 ~ ::J ::J a:::a:::a:::COCOI-a..a.. I - .s .E .0 :::J U) (J') ~ ~ .~ :Q :::J Cl.. 0101 C C -c: 'E: ro co .r::. .r::. CI)CI) (J') ~ ~ .~ :Q :::J Cl.. - - Ul Ul o 0 ()() ~~ ~ 5 5 Cll .~ 0 0 a. e()() r3 Q.. ro ro .l!l Qj~~~ ~ C C cCiS<(<(CiS rom "'=tv a:: ON........ C1l()III C1l"iii<(<(<( ~CllCl)CI)CI) Cl)CI)()()() ~~ .... ~ ~ g .E U) .... C1l ~ J!! c:: C1l ~ ca g- o :::: '0:( .!!l Cll e i'i5 01 C '0, "0 e Cl "0 c: o Q.. .... ~ ~ g .E U) I :rg .E -g U) ]! o :Q :::J U) :rg .E .0 :::J U) :rg .E .0 :::J U) .!!l Cll e i'i5 . - J!! ~ .... .8! ~ ftj ::r C C <C ftj .. o I- o LO N CD I'- ("I) I'- CD o o o o N ~ I'- o o LO I'- ~ CD C1> ..- 0000 LOOLOLO NOl'-I'- S~ ~~ 0("1) roro 1-1'- LO("I) CD ..- ..-C1>00 ro..-LOLO I'-Nroro LO~I'-I'- ("I)ro~~ 0) ~. ~. ..t LO..-LOLO 00 ..~O Cl)NO ~CD CI) 1'-. "("I) ,5..- 00..-C1>00 LOLOro..-LOLO I'-I'-I'-Nroro ("I)("I)O~I'-I'- ("I)("I)CDro~~ roroLO..t..t..t ("I)("I)..-..-LOLO o -0 CUo c... ,- 0 UCD ,E CD .. D.. o o o o N ..- o LO I'- ("I) ~ '#. Cl)LO n;ro 0:::("1) '#. ..- ..- "..: '#. I'- ..- "..: CI)~ g>~ g>~ n;LL<(LL<(.s C~~~~~ L.. 0- ro Q) :2: en I I ..- ..- "1'- CN ~("I) N ..- ("I) C1> o ("I) ro ~ ("I) <( LO o o N III .~ <( Q) CD..--. en 0...... al O~ ~ "'C N"Q' o C III L.. o 0 Q)e.. N al '~"'C '0 ffi en~ ~ a::: Iller: a..--. c ~ ~ allllQ) al~ ...... e E ......c ~ c Q) Q) '" e E~e Eal E Q)>O- Q)o<:l Q) >OE"--'>- > ea.-ce= o :2 0- E Iii .Q 0- 0) a. III E - :!: ro E .S E (ij-:gg-Ci5-: ~ -::2:0~ClQ)oe co ~e0=>og0Cl Q CJrooo<:lCJOoe? 1Il0..... ll.0Q) Q OrooQ)O.....o..... N OQ) .Q)LOc.c o .r:. 0 l:; I'- .- 0 :J "'CI)cill.O(/)r-:~OI CU ::rC1>-"!.-N-I'-,- CD~C1> N ro N >-.:~ ~ ~ ~ ..- o o N - o III "'C C o al o o I'- LO C1> ro o ..- ftj ::r C C <C ftj .. o I- o o LO I'- ro I'- C1> ..- LO I'- ro CD CD. N I'- OOC1>CDOLO LOLO LOLON r'r'N<DOO..- ftj("l)("I)C1>I'-I'-ro ..~~LOO~C1> o ..-' <.0 ro ..t 0) ..-' I-CD("I)LO..-roLO ..- ..- OOC1>CDOLO ..LOLO..-LOLON ~~~~~~C;; ~ ~. ~. roo 0, ~, C1>, "CCDCD~~~"- _("I)("I)..-..-LOLO -0 CUo c..o '(j Lri" CN Ii: ~ D.. CD C1> ro ("I) ~ o o o LO ("I) ..- '#. ,$..- cu"- 0:::"": '#. I'- ..- "..: ,$ ~ g>~ CULL<(.s C~~:2: L.. 0- ro Q) :2: en I I ..- ..- "N C..- ~("I) C1> o ("I) ro ~ ("I) <( LO o o N III .~ <( Q) CD..--. (f) 0...... al o~ ~ "'C N'O' g a :no: N al .~ "'C '0 ffi en~ ~ a::: ~er: c ..... c Q) O"--'C 00l alt!Q) al~ eiji~ eU Q) E > Q) ro EQ)e Eal Q)>O- Q)o<:l >OE"--'>- Oa._CO= 0.. E ro g c.. C) E - :!: ro E .S -:gg-Ci5-: ~ o~UQ)oe en 0=>og0Cl Q oo<:lCJOoe? Q 0(j)0ll.0Q) N O.Q)LO cO.e ... CI) g .b I'-: '0 g :J CU::rNenl'-""'I'-I CD Cl)N'-~-N- >-.!!~ ~ ~ LO I'- C1> LO """ o It) M o o N .... It) ..- """ N o It) M o o N .... It) o It) M It) N r:O o N o It) ,.... M o M Q) o o N .. cu CI) >- ftj .. o I- o o LO CD CD ro C1> ..- ro ro CD LO ro N I'- ftj ::r C C <C ftj .. o I- OOCD..-LOO LOLOLO("I)NLO NNCDO..-N "::("I)("I)I'-roroCD J:l("l)("I)LONC1>N O~~C1>("I)CDC1> I-CD("I)LO..-O'>~ ..- OOCD..-LOO ..LOLOLO("I)NLO Cl)NNCDO..-N CI)("I)("I)I'-roroCD ~ ("I).("I).O.N C1> N "c~",,"~("I)..-C1> _("I)("I)..-..-LO~ -0 CUo c..o '(j ci C("I) Ii: ~ D.. o o LO LO ~ o o o LO ~ ..- '#. ,$..- cu..- 0:::"": '#. I'- ..- "..: CI).o Ol>> n;Lf~;S C~~:2: L.. 0- ro Q) :2: en I 1 ..- ..- "N C.,.... ~("I) C1> o ("I) ro ~ ("I) <( LO o o N III .~ <( Q) CD..--. 0...... al W O~ ~ "'C N'O' o a :no: ~ al 'C - c Q)-g o ..!l1 Wo ~ ll. ~er: c ...... c Q) O(j)iji 00) aleE al~ CQ)Q) eg Q)E E i5i Q)E al Q)g;!a. Q)o<:l >OE"--'>- oa.-co= Q.E"'ffi2 Q.o> E - :!: ro E .S -: .q g- Ci5 -: ~ O~ClQ)Oe Q 0=>og0u "t"" oo<:lCJooe? 0...... ll.0Q) Q 0Q)0......0...... N ,Q)LOc.c ... O.b"'" '0 0 :J _CI)OWr--:-.OI CD ::rN..-N-I'-.- >-l:N ro N -~ ~ ~ LO I'- ("I) ~ N CD ~ N M (l) u; (l) ,.... r-: .... lO M (l) u; (l) ,.... r-: .... lO M (l) u; (l) N r-: Q) .... o o It) o N M o .... o N .. cu CI) >- ftj .. o I- ~3 CiS ::s C C <C CiS - o .... o o to '\"""" '\"""" ..q:- 0) '\"""" Ii) I'- M CO 0) N I'- 00 Ii) 10 NN <D'\"""" N'<t 0> cO '<t'<t o 10 N r-: '<t o o o o 10 '\"""" o 10 r-.: CiSlO _0 ON ....<D '\"""" 0'\""""'<t00 Ii) ('I') '<t 1010 r-.:c::iMNN IO('I')IO<D'\"""" OIO'<tN'<t NON'O>cO ('I')<D'\""""o)'<t '\"""" "*' I'- '\"""" ~ ... a. ro CJ.) ~C/) I I '\"""" '\"""" C1> o ('I') co '<t ('I') 00'\""""'<t _IOIO('I')'<t 1I)r-.:r-.:c::iM f 1010 CO 10 CDOON'<t -NN('I')N ..5('1')('I')'\""""'\"""" -0 ClIO c.o '(3 c:l C('I') It: .,- c.. "*' ,S'\"""" ClI'\"""" a::~ CD ..0 0> >- _CJ.)::JE ClILL<(...... Q~~~ 'tJN C,\",,"" .!('I') aJ '<t o o N ...... o l/l U I:: 000 aJ...... ...... I:: I:: CJ.) ~ ~ <( Ii) o o C'\I l/l CJ.) 'C CJ.) C/) U I:: o al I:: ro a: <( <D - 0...... o ~ N'~ l/l e CJ.)Q. ';::U CJ.) ro C/)o l/le::: -g CJ.) o 0> CC~ ...... 0 I:: ro CJ.)aJ E~ ...... I:: CJ.) E CJ.) > o ... CJ.) > a. CJ.) >eE-> e 0.- g e o.Ero~ 0.0> E - :t:: ro E ,!; -:~~en--: ~ o~()CJ.)oe ~ ci~o,gci() ~ 0~(900f!? 0""" Q.OCJ.) o OCJ.)O......O...... ('\II ,CJ.)IOI:: ,I:: o ;; I'- .- 0 ::J .. CDOC/)t...>~OI CG::sN----N____I'-____ >CD II) N CO N .!!J.fFj- fFj- fFj- o o to I'- <D LO '<t N ." ,... M ,... ,... N - ." ." ,... M ,... ,... N - ." ." ,... M N ." iii' CO - o ." N ....... N C") - - o N .. ClI CD > CiS - o .... o o o '\"""" N '<t 0) '\"""" CO CO <D N 0) N I'- CiS ::s C C <C CiS - {:. 00'<t 00'<t 1010('1') -0010 .:!! <D <D '<t, ~ '<t' 0> '\"""" .-<DN<D '\"""" '<too '<t101O ('I')NN 1'-'\""""('1') '<t, '<t, ('1'), '\"""" <D ('I') '\""""O'<t N 00'<t'<t00 _00'<3:'<3:U".!1O II) to to ('I') ('I')NN fOOIOI'-'\""""('I') CD <D <D '<t, '<t, '<t,~ -o)o)N'\""""<D('I') ..5NN'\""""'\""""'<t'<t -0 ClIO c.o '(3 LO C('I') Ii: ~ c.. o o o 0) '<t o o o o <D '\"""" CD"*' _'\"""" ClI'\"""" a::~ "*' I'- '\"""" ~ .s~g>~ ClILL<(:5 Q~~~ ... a. ro CJ.) ~C/) I I ..- ..- 'tJN C..- .!('I') 0) o ('I') CO '<t ('I') <( Ii) o o N l/l ,~ <( CJ.) <D- C/) ot) ~ "0 ~~ o I:: l/l 'e o 0 CJ.)Q. N al ';:: u ...... I:: CJ.)ro o Ctl C/) 0 ~ a: l/l 0:::: I:: ...... -gCJ.) ooo5j 00> CC"""E CC~ I:: 5j CJ.) I:: 0 CJ.) E > CJ.) ro ECJ.)e EaJ CJ.) > a. CJ.) ~ >OE_>- Oa.-I::O= a.ECii2 c..Cl E - :t:: ro E ,!; --: ~ ~ en --: ~ o~()CJ.)oe N ci~o,gci() ~ 0~c>00f!? 0""" Q.OCJ.) o 0CJ.)0......0""" N ,CJ.)IOI::.I:: o ... I'- ,- 0 ::J "CDOenr-:~OI CG::sN----N----I'----- (I) II) N' CO N' >.!!J.fFj- fFj- fFj- o o Ii) '<t I'- 0) '<t N CO ~ - CO CO (I) - ." CO ~ - CO CO (I) - ." CO CIC! - CO CO N ,... - o o o 'i C") N - o N .. ClI CD > CiS - o .... o o 10 ..- 0) ('I') 0) ..- CO CO CiS ::s C C <C CiS - o .... '\"""" CO ~ N I'- 00'<t'<t00 1010 '<t'<t 1010 I'-I'-MCONI'- -10 10 N 10('1') .:!!O)O)N'<t('l')O E. <D-<D-N-O('l')-O .-<DN<D'\""""..-'<t ..- N 00 _1010 (1)1'-1'- flOlO CD 0), ~ -<D<D ..5NN '<t'<t00 '<:1:'<3:1010 MCONI'- 1'-10('1')..- '<t'<t('l')O ..-' 0' ('1')' 0' ...-'\""""'<t'<t - 0 ClIO c.o '(30 C'<t 'e ~ c.. o 10 I'- o 10 o o o o I'- ...- CD"*' - '\"""" ClI"- a::~ "*' I'- ..,r ,S ~ g>~ ClILL<(:5 Q~~~ ... a. ro CJ.) 2c/) I I ...- ...- 'tJN C..- .!('I') 0) o ('I') co '<t ('I') <( 10 o o N l/l ,~ <( CJ.) <D........ C/) ot) CO OCJ.) ;g -g ~ 'e- O 0 CJ.)Q. N aJ ';:: U ...... I:: CJ.)ro o Ctl C/) 0 ~ a: ~o:::: I:: ...... I:: CJ.) ooo5j 00> aJeE ~~ I:: CJ.) CJ.) I:: 0 CJ.)E> CJ.)~ E Ql e E CJ.) > a. CJ.) ~ >eE........> e 0.- g e a.Ero~ 0.0> E - :t:: Ctl E ,!; -:~g-en-: ~ o~()CJ.)oe C"') ci~o,gci() ~ 0~C>&0f!? o 8'0)0......82 ('\II ,QlIOI:: ,I:: o ;; I'- '- 0 ::J .. CD 0 C/) 1'-' ~ 0 I CG::sN"_"N____I'-____ >CD II) N- CO N .!!J.fFj- fFj- fFj- o o o 10 ('I') ('I') 10 N o o 10 co ..- co CO 10 I'- CO I'- 10 C") CO Iti ""lI' CO M N ." '\"""" co o '<t I'- ..- 10 N co O'l ...- OO'<t'<tOIO 101O'<t'<tION NNcOMr-.:,-: 0'l0'l 0 I'-'\""""<D 001'-('1')010 '<t '<t' '<t' 0> L6 cO I'-N<D ..-('1') '\"""" N C") CO an ""lI' CO C")~ N ." 00'<t'<t 1010'<3:'<3: N N co ('I') O'l O'l 10 I'- 00 '<t ('I') - - - - '<t'<t00'l NN..- 010 I.() N r-.:,-: '\""""<D 010 O<D '<t('l') C") CO an en ." 'i - o o o o 10 '\"""" o ." N a; ,... C") o 10 N '<t 10 o o o 10 I'- '\"""" "*' '\"""" ..- ~ "*' I'- '\"""" ~ ..0 0> >- CJ.)::J- l.L<(:5 ~~~ ... a. ro CJ.) 2C/) I I '\"""" ..- N '\"""" ('I') O'l o ('I') CO '<t ('I') <( 10 o o N l/l ,~ <( CJ.) <D- C/) 0'- aJ O~ '<t "0 N '0' o I:: l/l... o 0 CJ.)Q. N aJ ';:: "0 ...... I:: CJ.) ro o ~ C/)o ~ Q. ~e::: I:: .- I:: CJ.) ooo5j og> CCeE CC~ I:: CJ.) CJ.) e g ~~e ~aJ CJ.) > a. CJ.) ~ i;e's'2i;_ ...0. 0'" o.Ero~ 0.0> E - :t:: ro E ,!; --: ~ g- en --: ~ o~()CJ.)oe ~ "lltci~o,gci() ~ ~0~(900f!? .. 00'- Q.oCJ.) ClI No,mgco,c CD o ;; I'- ,- O::J > "0C/) -OOI - : N, ____ ~ 2. 1'-, ____ .:!! >- ~ ::: ~~:; o I.() I'- o o I'- 0> ..- 00 00 cO "I CO C"i I'- 1.()1.()"<t"<t I'-I'-"<t"<t C")C")("')("') 001'-1.() OOC")N CO- ..-- I.()- lXi 1'-"1 CO ..- I.() I.() "I "I ..- ..- COCO I.() 00 ..- "I "I C") "I 1.()1.()"<t I'-I'-"<t C")C")("') 001'- OOC") ..- ..- 0> "IN "<t I.() I.() "<tNN MT"""'T- I.() CO CO "11.()00 ccicDN C") C") o o o I.() I.() ..- o o o cD I.() o o o I.() 00 ..- ~ ..- ..- ..t ~ I'- ..t .oOl>. Q):J- ~1~ L- a. lI) Q) ~(f) I I ..- ..- "I ..- C") 0> o C") 00 "<t C") <( I.() o o "I l/l .~ <( Q) CO..-.. 0- eo (f) 016 "<t "0 "1"(5' o c: l/l L- o 0 Q)O- "I eo 'C "0 '+- c: Q)lI) o lI) (f)0 ~ c: ~o:: c: - c:Q) ov;-ffi 00l eocE CD~ c: Q) Q) c: 0 Q) E > <I) lI) EQ)e ECD Q) > a. Q) oes >oE"-">- 05.- c: 0= 5.EroB 5.0l E - :!: lI) E .~ -:~g-U5-: ~ O:EUQ)oe ..,,0:Jog0u """ooes(900~ QOQioO-02 NO.Q)l.()co.c: o .J:; I'- .- 0 :J "'O(f)r-:.QOI : N.. '--" "I '--" 1'-_ '--" >~ ~ ~ o I.() "I "I "<t "<t I.() "I OQ OQ cO 10 C> .n N 10 OQ OQ cO 10 C> .n N 10 OQ OQ cO 10 C> a) N 't"" o o C> rD en M 10 't"" C> N ... ftS G) > ii '0 t- o o o I'- "<t. I.() 0> ..- 00 00 CO ..- 00 "<t I'- 00"<t"<t1.()1.() OO"<t"<tNN LOLO("')("')..-..- C") C")I.()CO COCO 1'-1'-1'-0000> I'--I'--I'--r-:r-:OO I'-..-CO "IN ..- "I 00"<t"<t1.()1.() OO"<t"<tNN I.()LO("')("')..-..- C")C")I.()COCOCO 1'-1'-"10000> I'- 1'-- cci r-: N cci ..-..- C")N o o o o CO ..- o o I.() a) I.() o o o I.() 0> ..- ~ ..- ..- ..t ~ I'- ..- ..t .0 Ol >. Q):J- L1.<(.s ~~~ L- a. lI) Q) ~(f) I I ..- ..- "I ..- C") 0> o C") 00 "<t C") <( I.() o o "I l/l .~ <( Q) CO - (f) at) CD "0 ~ .~ ~ c: l/l e o 0 Q)O- "I CD 'C"O '+- c: Q)lI) o lI) (f)o ~ c: ~o:: c: - c:Q) ov;-ffi 00l CDc E CD~ C:Q)Q) cl6 Q)E> Q)..... EQ)e E..... Q)>a. Q)~ >OE->- 05.-C:0= c.Ern:8 Cia> E - :!: lI) E .~ -:~g-U5-: ~ O:EUQ)oe CD0:Jog0u """ooes(900~ QOQioO-02 N~Q)I.()C:O_C: o .J:; I'- .- 0 :J ... 0 (f) 1'-- .Q 0 I : "I. '--" "I '--" 1'-. '--" >~ ~ ~ o I.() "I "I 00 CO I.() "I OQ M en C> 't"" "'"' N 10 OQ M en C> 't"" "'"' N 10 OQ M en C> CQ N 't"" 't"" o C> 10 ..t 't"" "l:I' CQ 't"" o N ... ftS G) > ii - o I- o o I.() I.() "<t 00- 0> ..- I.() "! ..- N ..- ..t I'- 00"<t..- I.()~'<:I:OO I'-I'-C")I'- "1"1..-0 "IN C") 00 "<t-"<t-OO-L{) OO"-CO ..- I.() 0 NO ..-0 CO...... 0>00 C"l"<t C")N "I 00"<t..-1.() 0 I.()I.()"<tOONO ""':""':(",)""':"""0 NNCOOCO...... NNOOOO>CO "<t- "<t- r-: L{) 00 "<t ..-..- "IN o o o o I'- ..- o I.() "I o o o I.() o "I ...... CO "eft. ..- ..- ..t ~ I'- ..- ..t ..0 Ol >. Q):J- L1.<(.s ~~~ L- a. lI) Q) ~(f) I I ...... ..- "I ..- C") 0> o C") 00 "<t C") <( I.() o o "I l/l .~ <( Q) CO - (f) at) CD "0 ~.~ ~ c: l/l e o 0 Q)O- "I CD 'C"O '+- c: Q)lI) o lI) (f)o ~ c: l/lO:: c: - -gQ) ov;-ffi 00> CDcE CD~ C:Q)Q) cl6 Q)E~ Q)CD ~~5. ~oes ~eEc~= L- a. 0 L- a.Ero:;:J a. 0> E - :!: lI) E .~ -:~g-U5-: ~ O:EUQ)oe ,....0:Jog0u """ooes(900~ QOO)oO-O<l) NO.Q)I.()C:O_c o .J:; I'- .- 0 :J ... 0 (f) 1'-- .Q 0 I C'G "1_ '--" "I '--" 1'-_ '--" >-(1) N co N f:I7 f:I7 f:I7 I.() N o 10 ....: "l:I' Mft 't"" C") 10 ..- I'- I'- cci I.() N C> 10 ....: "l:I' C"t 't"" C") 10 C> 10 ....: en C> .n en o 10 N rD C") "l:I' ..... 't"" o N ... ftS G) > ii - o I- o o o I.() 0> I.()- 0> ..- CO o "I N o I.()- I'- 00..-1.() OOCON 1.()1.()r--:..t I'-I'-I.()CO "<t_ "<t_1.() "<t 1.()00"<t 00..-1'- 00 01.() ON ..-0 00"<t 0> 0- C")N N 00 00 I.() I.() I'- I'- "<t_ "<t_ OO ..- ..- ..-I.()OO 00"101.() I'-..tON OCO..-O 00 "<t 00 "<t_ I.() "<t-"<t-o "IN o o o I.() I'- ..- o I.() I'- "<t CO o o o I.() ..... "I eft. ..- ..- ..t ~ I'- ..t ..0 Ol >. Q):J- L1.<(.s ~~~ L- a. lI) Q) ~(f) I I ..... ..- "I ..- C") 0> o C") 00 "<t C") <( I.() o o "I l/l .~ <( Q) CO- (f) 0- eo 016 "<t u "1'0 o c: l/l L- a 0 <I) 0- N CD .~ "0 a ~ (f)~ ~ c: ~o:: c: - c:Q) O"-"C: 00> CD.!BQ)E CD~ c: _ 0 c: Q) Q) c: lI) ~~e ~CD Q)>a. Q)oes ~eEc~= L-a. 0L- a.Ero:;:J a.0l E - :!: lI) E .~ -:~g-U5-: ~ O:EUQ)oe co0:Jog0U """ooes(900~ QO- O-OQ) No.lBgco.c o .J:; I'- .- 0 :J "'O(f)r-:.QOI : "1_ '--" "I '--" 1'-. '--" >~ ~ ~ o I.() "I ..- "I ci CO "I CQ 10 ~ OQ 't"" 't"" C") 10 CQ 10 ~ OQ ~ 't"" M 10 CQ 10 ~ M "l:I' rD ..... C> 10 ..... ..t 10 "l:I' OQ 't"" C> N ... ftS G) > s o I- ~5' o L() I'- M 0) r--" 0) ...... o o N Cf) o ..q' I'- L()L() 1'-1'- CO CO CO CO ..q. ..q. ......CO m ...... L()L()OO NI'-L()L() ..ql'-C\ir--: COCOOM O)O..qCO o c<). 0 ..0 I'- ..q...... N L()L()L()L()OO I'-I'-NI'-L()L() .. .. COCO..q I'-N I'- COCOCOCDOM ..q..q..qo-q-co cD co. ..q. c<). 0 ..0 N...... o o o L() CO ...... o o L() CO. CO o o o o N N 'cf? ...... ...... ...t 'cf? I'- ...... ...t .0 0> >. Q):::::S- u..<(E ~~~ L. a. ('0 Q) ~Cf) I I ...... ...... N ...... M 0) o c<) CO ..q M <( L() o o N l/) .~ <( Q) CO--- 0...... CD Cf) O~ ..q "0 N"Q' o c:: l/)L. o 0 Q)a. N CD 'C "0 - c:: Q) ('0 o ('0 Cf)o ~ a:: l/) 0::: c:: - -gQ) olilffi ofij> CDc E CD~ C::Q)Q) c~ Q)E> Q)CD EQ)e EQ).... Q)>a. "" >oE--->- o 0.L._c:: 0= L. 0 L. o.ES:p o.g> E - .- ('0 E .- --: ~ g- U5 --: ::l O:EUQ)oe cn0=>og00 't""0~<.900~ 00- a.0Q) N~~gco.c o L. I'- '- 0 :::::s "'OU5r--"QOI : N. --";N --.,;1'-.--.,; >~ ~ ~ o o o ..q N CO L() N o 10 en o N rxi N 10 o 10 en o N as N 10 o 10 en o ..... ui 10 o o lit "l"" ..... '''It G) "l"" o N ~ CO CD >- ii - o I- o L() I'- CO M m m ...... o o cO ..q (0 ..q I'- L()L()L()L()OO I'-I'-I'-NL()L() c<)Mr--:Or--:N O)O)(OCOc<)O ............OL()co.m ri......OO I'- L()...... N I'-N m ...... L()L()L()L()OO I'-I'-I'-NL()L() C<)MI'-Ol'-N O)O)(OCOMO ............ 0 L()COO) N.N.M.~I.OO ...... ...... o 0 o 0 0."00 L()Q)O O)L.I'- ......2 ('0 ~ o o o L() c<) N 'cf? ...... ...... ...t "#. I'- ...... ...t .0 0> >. Q):::::S- ~1~ L. a. ('0 Q) ~Cf) I I ...... ...... N ...... M m o M CO ..q M <( L() o o N l/) .~ <( Q) (0--- Cf) ot) CD OQ) ...,. "0 N"Q' o c:: l/)L. o 0 Q)a. N CD 'c"O - c:: Q)('O o ('0 Cf)o ~ a:: l/) 0::: c:: - -gQ) olilffi 00> CDcE CD~ C::Q)Q) c~ Q)E> Q)eo EQ)e EQ).... Q) > a. "V 1)eE'21)= L.o. oL. o.Ero:p 0.0> E - ;!: ('0 E .S --: .~ g- U5 --: ::l O:E0Q)Oe 00=>og00 NO~<.9&O~ S8IDO-82 ..... . Q) L() C . c:: o .t:: I'- .- 0 :::::s "'OCf)r--"QOI : "'!.--.,;N--.,;I'-.--.,; >-~ ~ ~ o o o ..q I'- ...... CO N o o o Q o 10 o N o N ~ CO CD >- ii - o I- o 10 an ..... ..... I/f M 10 o 10 an ..... ..... .n M 10 o 10 an ..... ..... .n M L() N o co o L(). I'- L()OOO NOL()O oaNO CO 0 0) o mL() L() OL() I'- CO N L() ~ o CO L() 00 L()O NO om mL() 0..0 ...... o o L() ri I'- o o o o L() N 'cf? I'- ...... ..t ~ .c. ~ L. a. ('0 Q) :2Cf) I I ...... ...... m o M CO ..q M <( L() o o N l/) .~ <( Q) CO--- 0...... Cf) O~ "0 N '0' 8 ~O: CD 'C Q)"O lij Cf) g a:: ~o::: - C Q) coO> Q)E CD ~ - u ~ ffi ('0 e E eo a. Q)~ E'21)- ro .Q 0.. 0> :!:: ro E S ~ Ci5 --: ::l 0Q)oe U '" 't""O=<.9~ N<.9Oo~ o a.0Q) Ngco_c I'- .- 0 :::::s ~ 1'-. Q 0 I CDN--.,;I'-.--.,; >- ~ ~ o L() N m ..q CO (0 N "l"" N o N ~ CO CD >- ii - o J- 00 00 00 0) L() L() CO N o o o 0) L() L() o o o o CO N 'cf? I'- ...... ...t L. a. ('0 Q) ~Cf) I I ...... ...... CO ...,. M <( (0 --- ot) ~Q) l/)'e Q)a. 'C "0 Q) ('0 Cf) 0 l/)O::: -g Q) o 0> CD]! U ('0 eo ~ c Q) E Q) > e- 0.0> E .S - l/) .l/) o e N00 NO~ OOQ) NO. c o :::::s ;:26 Cl)N >f:R- o o o m L() L() (0 N '''It 10 CD N~ ..... G) Q "l"" '''It Ol) G) "'lt~ G) N N o 10 ..... N 10 ..... rxi - ,g CD c ii - o I- ~ o Z :J LL I- () W ...., o a:::: Q. en> U)lII WZ Z~ CO WO t-~ <<IUS Wa:::: ClII ZI- -co W o 0 0 CO l{) 0 0 ()) 0 1'-. 0 0 O. ~ 0_ a:). N l{) 0 l{) 0 0 0 1'-. CO I'- a:) 1'-. CO ()). I'- a:) N ..- I'- N C'? ()) o C'? a:) '<t C'? N ..- C'? <( l{) o o N en <ll <( .~ ~ ts (/) O<ll CO "0 N .0 '<t C en a..L.. o 0 <ll ..- 0 CO .C "0 o N <llro o -- C (/)0 N 0 ro cna:::: -- en a:: "O<ll o "0 _ CO) en t:_C Oro "0 Oen<ll CO~ C cocE -0 o C<ll<ll t:ro ~:=:-<ll E ~ ~co t:<llE<llCi. <ll~ ~~~eE'2~= <ll.t:oo.-oL..O) >0.. L.. En;+:: o.c o 0. ro E ._ L...t:E-:t:__en o.~-z.g-(/) .:g Ero .="<ll0L.. - 0:::: 0 +:: '-' 0 In () ..0:::; .:JO=,-, en qc(D~(DOOL.. (Droo a..O<ll cnOaio.-oc o ro 0 <ll l{) .!: 0 ::J o <llo;;l'-_oOI O..t: 0 (/) I'- 3 I'- ___ oa..N___N N- O> ---. a:) 0> N EA- EA- EA- EA- I- III W o -l ~ o I- ~1 Notice of Proposed Total Budget and Property Taxes The Centerville city council will hold a public hearing on its budget and on the amount of property taxes it is proposing to collect to pay for the cost of services the city will provide in 2008. SPENDING: The total budget amounts below compare the city's 2007 total actual budget with the amount the city proposes to spend in 2008. 2007 Total Actual Budget Proposed 2008 Budget Change from 2007 - 2008 $ 2,357,900 $ 2,441,600 3.55% TAXES: The property tax amounts below compare that portion of the current budget levied in property taxes in the city of Centerville for 2007 with the property taxes the city proposes to collect in 2008. 2007 Property Taxes Proposed 2008 Property Taxes Change from 2007 - 2008 $ 1,915,900 $ 1,985,600 3.64% LOCAL TAX RATE COMPARISON: The following compares the city's current local tax rate, the city's tax rate for 2008 if no levy increase is adopted, and the city's proposed tax rate for 2008. 2007 Tax Rate 2008 Tax Rate if NO Levy Increase 2008 Proposed Tax Rate 45.74% 43.92% 45.74% Attend the Public Hearing All Centerville City residents are invited to attend the public hearing of the city council to express their opinions on the budget and on the proposed amount of 2008 property taxes. The hearing will be held on: Wednesday, December 12th, at 6:30 p.m. Centerville City Hall 1880 Main Street Centerville, Minnesota If the discussion of the budget cannot be completed, a time and place for continuing the discussion will be announced at the hearing. You are also invited to send your written comments to: City of Centerville, Mayor 1880 Main Street, Centerville, Minnesota 55038 Note: Public Hearing Notice must be published on or after Dec 4 but not later than Dec 10, 2007 /t;P tervi{{e 'Esta6{is/ied 18-57 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE 1880 :Main Street, Centervifk, 'MN 55038 651-429-3232 or 'FdJ( 651-429-8629 RESOLUTION NO. Resolution Approving Proposed 2008 Budget and Tax Levy BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Centerville, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, that the following proposed budget and tax levy be adopted for taxes payable in 2008 in the City of Centerville for the following purposes: Expenditures Revenues Tax Levy General Fund$2,441,600 $456,000 $1,985,600 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a public budget hearing will be set for the 12th day of December, 2007 at 6:30 p.m. in the Centerville City Hall for the purpose of obtaining input on said budget. The continuation date for the hearing, if required, will be set for the 19th day of December, 2007 at 6:30 p.m. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Anoka County, Minnesota. Passed and adopted this _ day of September, 2007. CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA By: Mary Capra, Mayor ATTEST: Teresa Bender, City Clerk 69 tervi{{e 'L.;tabfisfied- 1&:;7 1880 'Main Street, Centervi([e, 'M1If 55038 651-429-3232 or PIV( 651-429-8629 Planning & Zoning Commission Findings and Retommendation. The Planning & Zoning Commission met on September 4,2007, to hold a public hearing to consider a request of Bennett & Koch Construction, LLC and property owner Will Lessard to operate a construction business at 6995 20th Avenue South. The neighboring property owners within 350 feet were mailed notice of hearing and the notice was published in the official paper. Comments from interested persons were considered in making these findings. Findings: 1) The applicants proposed business qualifies as a conditional use in the B-1 zoning district. 2) The Commission identified adverse impacts that can be mitigated by including additional conditions for a permit. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION:. The Planning & Zoning Commission recommends that the conditional use permit be granted, finding specifically that the applicant can satisfy reasonable conditions that will mitigate the adverse impacts of approving the project and the conditional use permit. The recommended form of permit is attached for consideration by the City Council Dallas Larson, Administrator 10 ............................................................................ CITY OF CENTERVILLE ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Centerville hereby grants approval of a conditional use permit for: Bennett & Koch Construction, LLC and property owner Will Lessard to operate a construction business at 6995 20th Avenue South and subject the conditions of this permit. 2. Property. The permit is for the following described property: Outlot A, Center Villa 3. Conditions. This permit is issued subject to the following conditions: a) The site shall be cleaned up to remove any tires, debris, equipment parts and the like. b) Construct an 8 foot, wood, privacy fence shall be constructed as shown on the attached site plan in accordance with City Code Section 154.060 D. c) Not more than eight motor vehicles and trailers can be stored on the site at any one time and all must be in operable condition and currently licensed. d) No construction materials may be stored outside the building. e) Bulk gasoline or other fuels shall not be stored on site and there shall be no exterior storage of containers of lubricants or other chemicals. f) Landowner and the business operator shall jointly and individually be responsible for the continuing conformance with the permit. 1 1/ g) Limits on the noise emitted at the property line to not exceed 70 decibels. And requiring that the business conform to the noise regulations contained in City Code Section 91.09 and other nuisance regulations contained in Chapter 91. h) Business operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday-Friday and 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekends. i) Grantee will follow the applicable standards and requirements of the City of Centerville, local Fire Marshall, Rice Creek Watershed District, Anoka County, Army Corp of Engineers, FEMA, Minnesota DNR and any other agency having jurisdiction over the property and shall secure and file with the City, any permits required by outside agencies. j) This permit will be reviewed annually and additional conditions may be imposed in order to address any unforeseen impacts from the use. 4. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: September ---' 2007 CITY OF CENTERVILLE BY: Mary Capra, Mayor Attest: Teresa Bender, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this _ day of September, 2007. by Mary Capra, Mayor and Teresa Bender, Clerk of the City of Centerville, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public 2 1L Minneapolis City of Lakes Office of the Mayor R. T. Rybak Mayor 350 South 5th Street. Room 331 Minneapolis MN 55415-1393 Office 612 673-2100 Fax 612 673-2305 TTY 612 673-3187 www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us Affirmative Action Employer August 28, 2007 Mayor Mary Capra City of Centerville 1810Fox Run Centerville, MN 55038-8713 Dear Mayor Capra, Please accept our heartfelt thanks for your good wishes and help as Minm:apoli~, the region and the state has responded to the tragi~ collapse of the I-35W Bridge on Aug. 1,2007. Our state has had more than its share of challenges over the last year, most recently the terrible flooding in the southeastern part of the state. In the face of these significant challenges and heartbreaking loss of life, we have come together. Interstate 35W is a crucial transportation artery for the Minneapolis - Saint Paul region and the State of Minnesota. It is vital that we rebuild a safe bridge in an orderly and efficient way. To that end, on Aug. 17,2007 all 13 Minneapolis City Council Members and I approved a set of principles that outlines the City's shared vision for building a new Interstate 35W Bridge. This vision reflects the City's firm commitment to ensuring our state builds a safe bridge as expeditiously as is reasonable, but most importantly, that we do it right and with an eye toward the future transportation needs of the people of Minneapolis and all of Minnesota. The unanimously approved principles, which we have attached, outline Minneapolis' position that the new bridge should be designed to meet present and future transportation needs by improving vehicle capacity and providing transit capacity, including the potential for a future light rail or bus rapid transit line. We ask for your suppon for these principles. which we hope reflect a shared vision for building a safe bridge that will meet our transportation and transit needs for decades to come. The Minnesota Department of Transportation is moving forward in close collaboration with Minneapolis Public Works staff to begin planning for the new bridge. Last week, MnDOT submitted a layout to Minneapolis for our consideration for Municipal Consent. That layout includes instructions from Governor Tim Pawlenty that MnDOT plan and construct a ten-lane bridge, with two lanes that could be devoted to Bus Rapid Transit and/or managed lanes. He has also directed MnDOT to build and construct an "LR T -ready bridge". These positive steps reflect the spirit of our statement of principles. 13 As you may know, state statute gives cities responsibility to provide Municipal Consent for construction projects in their communities. It falls to Minneapolis to fulfill this responsibility for the 1-35W Bridge, although we know this bridge serves the entire state. Our next step in the Municipal Consent process is to set a public hearing. Last week the City Council set a time and place for the public hearing at: Minneapolis Public Hearing on Municipal Consent Thursday, September 20 5:30 p.m. Thrivent Financial Auditorium 625 4th A venue South Minneapolis, MN 55415 We will continue to work closely with MnDOT to ensure that the final layout reflects a bridge for the next 100 years. We hope to work with you to make sure that we build this new bridge safely, efficiently and right. We welcome your support and comments regarding the statement of principles that will guide us, and we hope that you will participate in the Municipal Consent hearing on September 20. Many thanks for the assistance your community has already given to this effort. Please don't hesitate to contact either of us if you have questions, or would like to discuss this further. Sincerely, Mayor R.T. Rybak City of Minneapolis 11 Statement of Principles By Colvin Roy, Glidden, Hodges, Ostrow, Gordon, Hofstede, Johnson, Samuels, Lilligren, Goodman, Schiff, Remington, and Benson REBUILDING THE I-35W BRIDGE Interstate 35W is a crucial transportation artery for the Minneapolis - Saint Paul region and the State of Minnesota. It is vital that we rebuild a safe bridge in an orderly and efficient way. We need to do that as expeditiously as is reasonable, but most importantly, we need to do it right. We believe: · That the new I-35W Bridge should be designed and built to meet present and future transportation needs; . That the new bridge should be designed to improve vehicle capacity and also provide transit capacity; . That the new bridge design should incorporate, and certainly not preclude options for future transit improvements, such as making the new bridge structure LRT ready and BRT ready; . That we should work together to support and identify funding to address other transportation needs to ensure that the new bridge functions efficiently once it is built; and . That the bridge should be built to meet all current environmental standards. . That the Minnesota Department of Transportation should set equal opportunity employment goals for minorities and women equal to or above the current City of Minneapolis' goals. · That the new fifth lanes on the bridge should be dedicated for transit and high occupancy vehicles (HOV). In recognition of the individuals who were lost in the I-35W bridge collapse, a memorial should be created. The Minnesota Department of Transportation should provide accurate and timely information to the public and seek out and consider community input into the design and construction process. COMMITMENT TO IMPROVING RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE In addition to the 1-35W Bridge, we also see an opportunity to dramatically improve the overall infrastructure of the corridor and to safely accommodate future transportation and transit needs. We are committed to avoiding shortsighted solutions that will quickly replace the 15 bridge, but may not give adequate consideration to the long-term infrastructure needs of the region and state. Prudent and orderly planning is necessary on the front end, and can be done in a way so not to jeopardize eligibility for emergency federal funding. To address these related infrastructure needs, we believe: · That we should develop a bridge design that addresses the bottleneck created by the University and 4th Street bridges on the north end of the site; · That we should provide transit enhancements along the I-35W corridor, and transit-oriented services for downtown Minneapolis; . That design and planning for the new I-35W Bridge reduce congestion using strategies outlined in the Urban Partnership Agreement; . That we should develop and approve a design immediately south of the bridge that supplements the existing freeway access provided at Washington Avenue, which is currently at capacity. · That we address the impact of proposed changes on municipal streets in the corridor. We are committed to working with our local, state and federal partners to make these prudent investments as much as possible during the freeway closure. This comprehensive and coordinated approach will, over time, provide the most cost-effective and safe infrastructure improvements for the State. /% tervi[[e 'LstaJj{ishet{ 1857 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE 1880 ?rlain Street, Centervifk, ?rlN 55038 651-429-3232 or 'Fa.1( 651-429-8629 RESOLUTION #_ RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS' STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES REGARDING THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE I-35W BRIDGE AND FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS OF MINNEAPOLIS, ST. PAUL & THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the City of Centerville received the City of Minneapolis' recent letter requesting support of their "Statement of Principles" regarding the reconstruction of the I-35W bridge and future transportation needs of the Cities of Minneapolis, St. Paul and the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed and concurs with the City of Minneapolis , vision pertaining to the reconstruction of the I-35W bridge and its importance to the State of Minnesota as a crucial transportation artery; and THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED that the City of Centerville City Council supports the City of Minneapolis' "Statement of Principles" regarding the reconstruction of the I-35W bridge and future transportation needs of the Cities of Minneapolis, St. Paul and the entire State of Minnesota. Passed and adopted this 12th day of September, 2007. CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA By: Mary Capra, Mayor ATTEST: Teresa Bender, City Clerk 11 tervi[[e 'Esta6{isfzed 1857 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET CENTERVILLE DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT September 6, 2007 Project Number: 000616-07162-0 Revised 2/05 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Note to preparers: This form is available at http://www.eob.state.mn.us. EA W Guidelines are also available at the web site. The Environmental Assessment Worksheet provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EA W is prepared by the Responsible Governmental Unit or its agents to determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement should be prepared. The project proposer must supply any reasonably accessible data for - but should not complete - the final worksheet. If a complete answer does not fit in the space allotted, attach additional sheets as necessary. The complete question as well as the answer must be included if the EA W is prepared electronically. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Project title Centerville Downtown Redevelopment 2. Proposer Beard Group 3. RGU City ofCenterville Contact person: Ron Mehl Title: Development Principal Address: 750 2nd Street NE, Suite 100 City, state, ZIP: Hopkins, MN 55343 Phone: 952-930-0630 Fax: 952-930-0631 E-mail: ronm@beardgroupinc.com Contact person: Dallas Larson Title: Administrator Address: 1880 Main Street City, state, ZIP: Centerville, MN 55038-9794 Phone: 651-429-3232 Fax: 651-429-8629 E-mail: dlarson@centervillemn.com 4. Reason for EA W preparation (check one) EIS scoping _ Mandatory EA W --X....... Citizen petition _ RGU discretion Proposer volunteered _ If EA W or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number and subpart name: The project is a mixed use residential/commercial development project. An EA W is required under 4410.4300, subpart 32 Mixed Residential and Industrial-Commercial Projects. 5. Project location County Anoka _1;4 NW % Sections 23 City Centerville Township Township 31N Range 22W 2 Attachments and Figures for the EA W: Attachments: Attachment 1: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program response to inquiry, August 13,2007 Attachment 2: Traffic Analysis, August 24, 2007 Attachment 3: Noise and Air Quality Impact Analysis, September, 2007 Attachment 4: Minnesota Historical Society State Historic Preservation Office response to inquiry, August 16,2007 Figures: Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Project Location Map USGS Topographic Map Concept Plan Existing Conditions Wetlands and Public Waters Shoreland Buffer Zone FEMA Floodplain Zone Anoka County Soils Survey ~ T\QC".....~l~tinn u. ...,,,~"'..p,,.aU..l..a a. Provide a project summary of 50 words or less to be published in the EQB Monitor. Redevelopment of Centerville's existing downtown area. New buildings will be a mix of retail or commercial and multifamily housing. Retail and commercial space will be available on the first floor of buildings along Main Street and Centerville Road with condo style homes above. Surrounding blocks will be filled with townhomes. b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Emphasize construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes. Include modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes and significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures. Indicate the timing and duration of construction activities. The redevelopment of Centerville's existing downtown area to multi family housing (374 units) and commercial retail and office space (63,000 square feet) is proposed to occur over a period of approximately five years as land becomes available for the developer. 3 The project location is shown on Figures 1 and 2. The proposed development concept plan and phasing are shown on Figure 3; existing conditions are shown on Figure 4. All existing buildings in the development area will be razed to accommodate the development as the properties become available for purchase by the developer. Street and utility reconstruction will occur in advance of or in conjunction with these phases to accommodate the new buildings. Since the proposed use of the development area is similar in nature to the existing use, grading operations will be limited and should not substantially change drainage patterns or impact natural resources in the area. The existing City utilities in the area will be modified to accommodate the increased density and more intense use of water. Storm drainage features will be added to treat and regulate runoff quality and quantity, respectively. Again, since the new use will not vary substantially from the existing use, there will not be a significant increase in storm water runoff, but we will have the opportunity to provide quality and quantity regulation where none existed before. c. Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries. The purpose of the project is to revitalize a struggling downtown business district and to add new and affordable housing stock to the City. The City would also like to encourage a pedestrian friendly downtown that invites people to patronize local businesses on foot or by bicycle. d. Are future stages of this development including development on any outlots planned or likely to happen? _Yes X No If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present project, timeline and plans for environmental review. e. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? Yes XNo If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review. 7. Project magnitude data Total project acreage 37.41 acres Number of residential units: unattached Q.. attached 374 Maximum units per building 72 Commercial, industrial or institutional building area (gross floor space):total sq. ft. 63.000 4 Indicate areas of specific uses (in square feet): Office 31,500 Retail 31,500 Warehouse Q Light industrial Q Other commercial (specify) 0 Building height 20 - 40 feet Manufacturing Q Other industrial Q Institutional Q Agricultural Q If over 2 stories, compare to heights of nearby buildings: Existing buildings within and adjacent to the project area consist primarily of one to two story residential and commercial spaces. St. Genevieve's Church is within the project area and exceeds two stories due to its steeple. Heights of proposed structures would be similar to existing heights and would complement heights of building located adjacent to the project area, including the Centerville Elementary School and the HRA senior housing units. 8. Permits and approvals required List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure. Unit of Government Type of Application Status US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Clean Water Act Application to be submitted (impacts to waters in the Corps' jurisdiction) Minnesota Department of Natural Temporary Water Appropriations Application to be submitted, I Resources Permit if necessary Minnesota Pollution Control National Pollutant Discharge Application to be submitted Agency Elimination Systems (NPDES) Permit/General Stormwater Construction Permit Minnesota Pollution Control Notice of Termination of Notice to be submitted after Agency Construction Activities construction is complete Minnesota Pollution Control Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit Application to be submitted Agency Minnesota Department of None N/A Transportation (MnJDOT) Metropolitan Council Permit to Connect to Regional Application to be submitted Sewer System Rice Creek Watershed District Wetland Conservation Act permit Application to be submitted Rice Creek Watershed District Watershed Permit Application to be submitted Anoka County Highway Permit for work in CSAH 14 ROW Application to be submitted Department Anoka County Highway Permit for work in CSAH 21 ROW Application to be submitted Department Anoka County Highway Approval of road reconstruction Plans to be submitted Department plans for CSAH 21 5 City of Centerville Developer's Agreement Master Agreement is signed. Each phase will require a separate agreement related to the Master. City of Centerville ADDroval of Street and Utility Plans Plans to be submitted 9. Land use Describe current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adjacent lands. Discuss project compatibility with adjacent and nearby land uses. Indicate whether any potential conflicts involve environmental matters. Identify any potential environmental hazards due to past site uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks, or proximity to nearby hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. The existing land uses within the project area are consistent with an established small- town core downtown. Numerous businesses and single family residential areas are located in the project vicinity (see Figure 4). The proposed conditions are for multiple businesses (office space) and retail to be located in larger buildings. Multi-family units and townhomes will replace the single family dwellings as they become available for purchase by the developer. Two institutional buildings are located adjacent to the project area. Centerville Elementary School is located to the north. The school building will not be affected, but enhancement of its parking lot within the project boundary is proposed. Two large senior housing buildings operated by Anoka County HRA are located adjacent to the south edge of the project area. The project will have limited effect on the senior housing complex. The Central Anoka County Regional Trail is planned to be located adjacent to CSAH 14 through the project area. Another designated trail, Rice Creek Chain of Lakes - Bald Eagle Regional Trail will run along Centerville Road and connect to the Central Anoka Trail. Potential Contamination A search was conducted of MPCA on-line records of potential contamination in the City of Centerville to determine the potential for contamination to be encountered during construction of the project. Eight records were found that included one unpermitted dump site, one Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (VIC) site, and six leak sites. The dump site is identified as the Centerville School Absorption Pit (Abandoned) and is located just north of the project area. Because of the close proximity to the proposed redevelopment area, it is possible that contamination from the school site adjacent to the north could migrate to the project site, although it is not anticipated. The VIC site is located east of Interstate 35E in the City of Lino Lakes, approximately 1.2 miles east of the project area at the closest point. Because of the distance to the VIC site, it is unlikely that contamination present at this property would impact the project area. The following table lists the leak sites as identified on the MPCA Minnesota Aboveground /Underground Storage Tank Site Search web page. 6 Business Address Product Contamination Offsite Site Name released Remainim! Contamination Closed *Old PW 1694 Sorel St Gasoline Yes No 1995 Garage E1em. School 1721 Westview Fuel Oil 1 & 2 Unknown Unknown 1996 **Trippels 1801 Main St Gasoline Yes Unknown 1995 Market Rivard 7087 Progress Unknown Unknown No 1999 Electric Rd Rehbien 6805 20th Ave Diesel No No 2006 Companies S. Noble 1724 Main St Fuel Oil 1 & 2 Yes No 1998 Welding * Building torn down in 2006 ** Outside of project area It is possible that asbestos and other hazardous materials may be present in the existing structures to be removed for the redevelopment project. Additional investigation will be needed to ensure that demolition of existing structures and disposal of debris is conducted in an appropriate manner in accordance with federal, state and local regulations. IO.Cover types Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development: Before I After n.......~Ilo....O' t\ ..t.... .I.J'l;J.UI.~ .L .....""... Types 1-8 wetlands 0.38 ac 0.00 ac Lawn/landscaping 22.87 ac 9.80 ac Wooded/forest 1.32 ac 2.53 ac Impervious Surfaces 12.84 ac 24.67 ac Brush! grassland 0.00 ac 0.00 ac Other (Storm Pond) 0.00 ac 0.41 ac Cropland 0.00 ac 0.00 ac TOTAL 37.41 ac 37.41 ac If Before and After totals are not equal, explain why: Not applicable. In addition, an area at the elementary school north of the redevelopment area is being considered for use as a storm pond. The area is approximately 1 acre in size and is open turf grass. II.Fish, wildlife and ecologically sensitive resources a. Identify fish and wildlife resources and habitats on or near the site and describe how they would be affected by the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid impacts. 7 The project site is located within an area of residential homes, commercial and retail, and roadways. Though it is essentially fully developed, there are a number of waterbodies on the edges of the area that provide habitat for fish and other wildlife. Waterbodies include wetlands, Clearwater Creek, and Centerville Lake. Wildlife species likely to be present in the project area include raccoon, rabbit, squirrel, fox, deer, egret, heron, goose, duck and other waterfowl, hawk and other raptors, songbirds and other bird species; small amphibians and reptiles may also be present. Fish species identified in area lakes include walleye, northern pike, black crappie, bullhead, yellow perch, largemouth bass, carp, sunfish, and white sucker. Because of the proximity to Centerville Lake and Clearwater Creek, erosion and sediment control will be important (see EA W Item 16). Best Management Practices will be used during construction of the project and may include silt fence, rock construction entrances, temporary sediment traps, biorolls, riprap, inlet protection, temporary seeding and mulch. b. Are any state-listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, rare plant communities or other sensitive ecological resources such as native prairie habitat, colonial waterbird nesting colonies or regionally rare plant communities on or near the site? ~Yes _No If yes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the project. Indicate if a site survey of the resources has been conducted and describe the results. If the DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research program has been contacted give the correspondence reference number: ERDB 20080122. Describe measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. The DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program was recently contacted regarding the potential presence of threatened or endangered species, as well as other rare or sensitive biological resources in the vicinity of the project. The response letter (see Attachment 1) indicated that one threatened species (Blanding's Turtle) was historically identified in 1989 crossing a road south of Centerville. This species is found primarily in shallow wetlands (1-3 feet deep), but nest in open, sandy uplands up to one mile from wetlands. The project area is not within a known state-wide importance priority area, where greater protection is recommended to protect Blanding's Turtles. The DNR has provided recommendations for avoiding and minimizing impacts to this species (see Attachment 1). All of the recommendations applicable to the project and the project area will be implemented except for the recommendation regarding road curbing. One of the primary goals of the proposed redevelopment project is to create a pedestrian- friendly downtown area. In that regard, barrier style curbs are needed for the roads in the project area to provide for pedestrian safety. 8 12.Physical impacts on water resources Will the project involve the physical or hydrologic alteration - dredging, filling, stream diversion, outfall structure, diking, and impoundment - of any surface waters such as a lake, pond, wetland, stream or drainage ditch? --1L Y es _No If yes, identify water resource affected and give the DNR Public Waters Inventory number(s) if the water resources affected are on the PWI: None. Describe alternatives considered and proposed mitigation measures to minimize impacts. A wetland determination study was completed for the redevelopment area. One wetland was found to be present near the eastern boundary of the project area, generally south of the Sorel Street alignment (see Figure 5). The actual road does not extend to the wetland area. Current plans for the redevelopment project show a stormwater treatment pond in the location of the wetland. The developer will need to work with the Rice Creek Watershed District to determine if this use of the wetland is acceptable. If not, the developer will be required to find a new location for the storm pond or design a two-cell treatment system where stormwater receives primary treatment in the first cell and then discharges to the wetland for secondary treatment. The wetland will be delineated in the future. Any impacts to the wetland will be subject to the Wetland Conservation Act Replacement requirement of 2: 1 mitigation. While no direct impacts as listed above are proposed, there are public waters adjacent to or partially within the site which warrant discussion. Centerville Lake (2-6P) is a 455- acre lake located on the west side of the project area. Clearwater Creek (aka AnokalWashington County Judicial Ditch 3) flows from the east toward the project area and then turns north and crosses through the northeast corner of the project area (Figure 5). The creek is planned to be realigned in this section starting in 2007 as part of the CSAH 14 reconstruction project by Anoka County. The CSAH 14 project and associated creek realignment was not initiated by the proposed redevelopment. Direct impacts to Centerville Lake or Clearwater Creek are not proposed by the downtown redevelopment project. 13.Water use Will the project involve installation or abandonment of any water wells, connection to or changes in any public water supply or appropriation of any ground or surface water (including dewatering)? -X- Y es _No If yes, as applicable, give location and purpose of any new wells; public supply affected, changes to be made, and water quantities to be used; the source, duration, quantity and purpose of any appropriations; and unique well numbers and DNR appropriation permit numbers, if known. Identify any existing and new wells on the site map. If there are no wells known on site, explain methodology used to determine. 9 The project will require connection to a public water supply and installation of new 12- inch water main along Main Street and individual water connections. The city's water supply, storage and distribution system has been designed to accommodate projected growth within the City as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. As the City develops and redevelops, additional water supply wells will be necessary. Due to the shallow depth of groundwater in some areas, dewatering may be necessary in some areas during construction. A temporary water appropriations permit will be obtained form the DNR if volumes to be dewatered are such that a permit is required. A search through the records of the County Well Index (CWI) indicated that there are 25 known wells located within the project area. All of these wells are domestic use (residential) wells. None of the identified wells appear to pump large enough quantities of water as to require a DNR appropriations permit. The majority of the wells are completed in the drift aquifer and are less than 100 feet in depth. Three bedrock-aquifer wells are completed at depths ranging from 92-106 feet. The following table summarizes information known about the wells identified within the project area: Unique Owner Address Depth Aquifer Use Number (feet) 126886 Floyd Lamotte 1695 Main Street 69 Drift Domestic 142031 Paul Houle 7124 Centerville Road 72 Drift Domestic 154341 Ron Van Kleek 7060 Goiffon Street 65 Drift Domestic 155862 Mickev Peloouin 7084 Centerville Road 78 Drift Domestic 155889 Joe Lacasse 7072 Centerville Road 72 Drift Domestic 163273 Richard Carpenter 7095 Centerville Road 79 Drift Domestic 169296 Randy Zarbock 1745 Heritaqe Street 66 Drift Domestic 176066 AI Auqustine 7064 Centerville Road 65 Drift Domestic 176073 Harold Rivard 7046 Centerville Road 68 Drift Domestic 182913 Charles Underwood 7128 Proqress Road 65 Drift Domestic 194483 Helen Turcotte 7073 Centerville Road 66 Drift Domestic 431482 Paul Anderson 7082 Progress Road 75 Drift Domestic 439185 John Mishler 1740 Heritage Street 71 Drift Domestic 439246 Jim Manninq 1680 Sorel Street 92 St. Peter Domestic 460032 Bjerqo Construction 7086 Progress Road 75 Drift Domestic 509563 Trio Inn 7082 Centerville Road 100 S 1. Peter Domestic 509649 Chauncey Barett 7024 Centerville Road 100 Prairie du Chien Domestic 531590 Dean Jernell 1749 Heritaqe Street 80 Drift Domestic 548749 Ralph Joe Wanless 7046 Goiffon Road 64 Drift Domestic 554336 Tim Strono 7096 Proqress Street 68 Drift Domestic 554370 Kelly's Korner Bar 7098 Centerville Road 106 Prairie du Chien Domestic 554859 Timberlane Homes 1680 Heritage Street 80 Drift Domestic 629085 David Kilian 1695 Sorel Street 70 Drift Domestic 656414 Peter Desoen 1688 Heritage Street 64 Drift Domestic Since the CWI database only contains wells where information has been recorded and cataloged, it is possible that other wells exist within the project area. If wells exist in the 10 project area, but are not recorded in CWI, it is likely that these wells are older than 1974. Also, there is a possibility that wells exist in the project area that are abandoned, but not yet properly sealed. If wells of this nature are discovered, these wells must be properly sealed according to Minnesota Well Code. 14.Water-related land use management district Does any part of the project involve a shoreland zoning district, a delineated 100- year flood plain, or a state or federally designated wild or scenic river land use district? ---.X- Y es _No If yes, identify the district and discuss project compatibility with district land use restrictions. Portions of the project extend within the City-designated lOa-foot shoreland buffer zones for Centerville Lake and Clearwater Creek (see Figure 6), as identified in the City Comprehensive Plan (1997). The redevelopment project will be required to comply with the City's ordinance pertaining to development within 100 feet of the waterbodies. The 1997 Comprehensive Plan indicates Centerville Lake and Clearwater Creek have floodplains designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (see Figure 7). The proposed project will be required to comply with all applicable floodplain regulations. 15 . Water surface use Will the project change the number or type oi watercraft on any water body? _Yes ---.X-No If yes, indicate the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or conflicts with other uses. A few townhomes in the redevelopment area may have access to the lake, however, no new public access will be provided to the lake as part of the redevelopment. 16.Erosion and sedimentation Give the acreage to be graded or excavated and the cubic yards of soil to be moved: 26 acres; 180,000 cubic yards. Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible soils and identify them on the site map. Describe any erosion and sedimentation control measures to be used during and after project construction. The majority of soil types within the project area do not represent steep slopes or highly erodible soils. There is one area in the north part of the project site where an eroded soil 11 type is identified: HdC2 - Hayden fine sandy loam, 6-12% slopes, eroded. Soils on steep slopes are designated with a "D" or an "E" in their mapping symbol and generally have slopes greater than 12%. Soils on slopes greater than 12% are not identified at the project site. The locations of the soil types are shown on Figure 8. Because construction of the project will disturb more than one acre of land, an application for a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities will be submitted to the MPCA. This permit requires the applicant to develop a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) which includes both temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control plans; the NPDES permit also requires the applicant to perform inspections and maintain inspection records. Erosion control measures to be used during construction are expected to include rock construction entrances, silt fence, rock ditch checks, temporary sediment traps, biorolls, riprap, inlet protection, temporary seeding and mulch. Initially, these erosion control devices will be placed at the downstream end of the construction limits; the devices will be installed prior to the start of any land disturbing activity. Additional devices as noted on the construction drawings may be added as construction progresses. The devices will be maintained as directed under permit requirements to maintain their effectiveness. Maintenance will be the responsibility of the Contractor. Within the timeframes stipulated in approved plans, graded areas will be paved, seeded and mulched, or covered with fiber blankets, stabilization mats, or sod. Erosion control devices will remain in place until site stabilization has been achieved and vegetation has been reestablished. Permanent strategies to control erosion and manage storm water are discussed in Item 17 and will include the use of constructed ponds and stormwater infiltration areas (such as raingardens) where the water can infiltrate. 17 . Water quality: surface water runoff a. Compare the quantity and quality of site runoff before and after the project. Describe permanent controls to manage or treat runoff. Describe any stormwater pollution prevention plans. As this is a redevelopment project, the existing site is primarily developed with a mix of residential and commercial land uses. Construction of the medium and high density residential and mixed use commercial sites will increase the impervious surfaces and therefore storm water runoff will increase. Proposed stormwater management measures will be designed to meet the City of Centerville, Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (MPCA NPDES) General Construction Permit requirements. The most stringent of these requirements in terms of stormwater management is RCWD. Compliance with these requirements will meet or exceed the requirements of the City and NPDES. 12 The stormwater management features for the site will be designed to meet RCWD's proposed new rules, dated June 13, 2007. Some highlights from these rules are: . Water quality and infiltration best management practices (BMPs) designed to infiltrate and/or retain the runoff volume from the two-year (2.8 inch) storm event. . For existing impervious surfaces that will remain after the redevelopment, the treatment requirement is to provide infiltration volume adequate for the 0.8-inch event. . Proposed discharge rates must be less than or equal to pre-development discharge rates. Therefore pre-developed conditions were assumed for the downtown area with a curve number associated with wooded/grass areas. The BMPs provided to meet the above RCWD requirements will include a combination of several features - rain gardens, depressed parking lot islands, pervious pavement with underground storage, pretreatment and infiltration basins. The BMPs will be designed to drawdown within 48 hours as required by the RCWD rules and the NPDES requirements. As discussed above, the project will require an NPDES permit because it will disturb more than one acre of land. The NPDES permit requires the preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) which includes both temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control plans and stormwater management measures. The proposed project will comply with NPDES requirements. The entity responsible for ensuring compliance will be specified in the permit. Both Centerville Lake and Clearwater Creek are listed as impaired waterbodies by the MPCA - a waterbody that does not meet water quality standards and designated uses because of "pollutant(s), pollution, or unknown causes of impairment". Clearwater Creek is impaired for fish and invertebrate index of biotic integrity and Centerville Lake is impaired for nutrients. RCWD is in the process of completing a TMDL study for Centerville Lake. With the use of the proposed stormwater management strategies and implementation of Best Management Practices erosion and sediment control measures, the project is not expected to worsen the lake or creek's impairment condition. Centerville Lake is listed as a priority lake by the Metropolitan Council. Lakes designated as priority lakes generally require a nutrient budget analysis to determine if the project will have an adverse effect on the lake's water quality. A nutrient budget analysis was not completed for several reasons: 1. The existing downtown project area was constructed prior to requirements for water quality treatment prior to discharge to Centerville Lake. The proposed project area will be designed with water quality features to meet the requirements listed above. This results in a significant improvement in the water quality of the runoff discharged from the site. Runoff volumes, total phosphorus and total suspended sediments will all be less than existing, even with the increase in impervious surface. 13 2. The drainage area to Centerville Lake will decrease from existing conditions. 3. The project area draining to Centerville Lake is considerably smaller than the entire drainage area to Centerville Lake. b. Identify routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site; include major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters. Estimate impact runoff on the quality of receiving waters. Runoff from the site, after treatment in the several infiltration basins and other stormwater best management practices, is routed via storm sewer to either Centerville Lake or Clearwater Creek. The majority of the site is tributary to Clearwater Creek which travels roughly 4,400 feet before discharging downstream to Peltier Lake. With the stormwater management strategies to be implemented for the project, it is not expected to impact the quality of receiving waters. I8.Water quality: wastewaters a. Describe sources, composition and quantities of all sanitary, municipal and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. Sanitary sewer wastewater will be produced from a few sources. The first would be municipal wastewater from the townhomes and condos. This waste will be typical of any residential development. The second would be municipal wastewater from retail and office space as proposed on the first floor of some of the downtown buildings. Again, this wastewater will be typical of any office building. The third source would be from any restaurant that may occupy some of the available retail space. Their wastewater may be higher in organic composition including fats and oils. Estimated quantities are listed below: Residential 65,000 gallons per day (gpd) (average) Office/Retail 11,000 gpd (average) Restaurants 44,000 gpd (average) Total = 120,000 gpd (average) b. Describe waste treatment methods or pollution prevention efforts and give estimates of composition after treatment. Identify receiving waters, including major downstream water bodies, and estimate the discharge impact on the quality of receiving waters. If the project involves on-site sewage systems, discuss the suitability of site conditions for such systems. All wastewater produced by the proposed redevelopment project will be treated at the Metropolitan Council's Metro Wastewater Treatment Facility. 14 c.1f wastes will be discharged into a publicly owned treatment facility, identify the facility, describe any pretreatment provisions and discuss the facility's ability to handle the volume and composition of wastes, identifying any improvements necessary. All wastewater produced by the proposed redevelopment project will be treated at the Metropolitan Council's Metro Wastewater Treatment Facility. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) will issue permits assuring that their facilities are able to handle the wastewater. Restaurants may be required to install grease traps or other such pretreatment devices on their wastewater discharge lines to prevent maintenance issues in City owned sanitary sewer pipes and lift stations. d. If the project requires disposal of liquid animal manure, describe disposal technique and location and discuss capacity to handle the volume and composition of manure. Identify any improvements necessary. Describe any required setbacks for land disposal systems. Not applicable. 19. Geologic hazards and soil conditions a. Approximate depth (in feet) to ground water: 5 ft bg minimum 15 ft bg average to bedrock: -60 ft bg minimum -80 ft bg average Describe any of the following geologic site hazards to ground water and also identify them on the site map: sinkholes, shallow limestone formations or karst conditions. Describe measures to avoid or minimize environmental problems due to any of these hazards. Depth-to-water and depth-to-bedrock information was obtained from well records found in the County Well Index database. According to the Surficial Geology Map of the Anoka 30x60 Quadrangle (Meyer and Patterson, Minnesota Geological Survey, 1999), the project site lies primarily in an area overlain by loamy till, chiefly comprised of loamy textured soil with unsorted sediments, pebbles, cobbles, or boulders. A symbol on the surficial geology map indicates the site has been intersected in the past by deep, broad troughs cut by meltwaters of the Superior lobe glacier. These features are evidenced by local chains of lakes, including Centerville Lake and Peltier Lake. According to the Bedrock Geology and Structure Map of the Seven-County Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (MossIer and Tipping, Minnesota Geologic Survey, 2000) for the project area, the uppermost bedrock units with the project area are the St. Peter Sandstone over much of the project area, with the Prairie du Chien Dolomite present as the first 15 bedrock unit over the northern and western edges of the project area. The Prairie du Chien is present over the entire project area, but is overlain by the St. Peter over much of the project. Where the Prairie du Chien is present as the first bedrock unit, it is generally found at the depth between 50-100 feet, classifying the area as being a "transition karst" area, as opposed to an "active karst" area where depth to carbonate bedrock is less than 50 feet deep. In general, areas of transition karst do not typically experience hazards such as sinkholes unless changes are made to local topography to reduce depth-to-bedrock. However, a minor risk for karst features developing in the project area does exist simply due to the nature and depth of the bedrock in the area. b. Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications, if known. Discuss soil granularity and potential for groundwater contamination from wastes or chemicals spread or spilled onto the soils. Discuss any mitigation measures to prevent such contamination. According to Anoka County soils information, the soil types listed in the following table are identified in the project area. Their locations are depicted on Figure 8. Soil Types Symbol Soil Name Special Hydrologic Sismificance* Soil Group** Af Alluvial land, mixed, Hydric D frequently flooded Bm Blomford loamy fine Hydric BID sand Cu Cut and fill land -- -- Du Dundas loam Hydric, prime BID farmland if drained HdB Hayden fine sandy Prime farmland B loam, 2-6% slopes HdC2 Hayden fine sandy Farmland of B loam, 6-12% slopes, statewide eroded importance NeA Nessel fine sandy loam, Prime farmland B 1-4% slopes Wb Webster loam Hydric, prime BID farmland if drained * Hydric soils, prime fannland soils and other important farmland soils were identified using the USDA NRCS online Soil Data Mart tool for Anoka County, Minnesota. Prime farmland, as defined by the USDA. is land that has the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics for producing food, feed, forage, fiber. and oilseed crops and is available for use in these areas. The designation is not meant to include land that is urban or built up. Soils designated as farmland of statewide importance are not considered prime but are still considered of value for agricultural use. 16 **The hydrologic soil group ref'ers to soils grouped according to their runoff-producing characteristics. The chief'consideration is the inherent capacity of the soil bare of vegetation to permit infiltration. The slope and kind of plant cover are not considered but are separate factors in predicting runoff Soils are assigned tofour groups. In Group A are soils having a high infiltration rate when thoroughly wet and having a low runoff potential. They are mainly deep, well drained, and sandy or gravelly. In Group D. at the other extreme are soils having a slow infiltration rate and thus a high runoffpotential. They have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, have a permanent high water table. or are shallow over nearly impervious bedrock or other material. A soil is assigned to m'o hydrologic groups if'part (If'the acreage is artificially drained and part is undrained, In general, water moves through coarse textured soils at a faster rate than through medium or fine textured soils. Therefore, potential impacts to ground water from spilled chemicals would be expected to be greater in areas with coarse textured soils. However, many factors in addition to soil granularity can affect infiltration and percolation rates in soils. Some of these factors include: soil water content, soil frost, the temperature of soil and water, surface roughness, the nature of the soil pore openings, vegetative ground cover, and the degree of soil compaction. Although chemical substances may be transported over the roadways in the project area, their use or storage on a permanent basis is not associated with the proposed project, other than in small quantities typical of residential, retail, and office use. 20.Solid wastes, hazardous wastes, storage tanks a. Describe types, amounts and compositions of solid or hazardous wastes, including solid animal manure, sludge and ash, produced during construction and operation. Identify method and location of disposal. For projects generating municipal solid waste, indicate if there is a source separation plan; describe how the project will be modified for recycling. If hazardous waste is generated, indicate if there is a hazardous waste minimization plan and routine hazardous waste reduction assessments. Demolition of existing structures to allow for redevelopment will generate waste materials. In addition to typical construction materials, it is possible that asbestos and other hazardous materials may be present in the structures to be demolished. Additional investigation will be needed to ensure that demolition of buildings and disposal of materials/debris is conducted in an appropriate manner in accordance with federal, state and local regulations. Construction activities will also generate solid waste materials. Materials will likely include waste concrete and asphalt, as well as other materials used in construction. It will also include organic debris such as shrubs and plant materials. Specific volumes of general waste materials to be generated are not known at this time. Waste materials will be recycled or disposed of in accordance with applicable local, state, and federal law . After the redevelopment, solid waste from the area will be similar to current conditions and will consist of typical household, commercial retail and office wastes. Wastes will be collected by a licensed solid waste handler in accordance with City ordinances. Recycling will be encouraged and will also be collected as is typical in the city of Centerville. Hazardous waste is not expected to be generated by the development.s 17 b. Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present at the site and identify measures to be used to prevent them from contaminating groundwater. If the use of toxic or hazardous materials will lead to a regulated waste, discharge or emission, discuss any alternatives considered to minimize or eliminate the waste, discharge or emission. During construction, equipment and vehicles utilizing gasoline, diesel fuel, antifreeze, and oil will be used at the project site. Portable storage tanks of fuel may be temporarily located at the site during construction. Fueling of vehicles and equipment will be conducted away from sensitive areas. If an accidental release occurs, efforts will be made to contain the release and the MPCA State Duty officer will be notified, as required. c. Indicate the number, location, size and use of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum products or other materials, except water. Describe any emergency response containment plans. As discussed above, portable storage tanks of fuel may be temporarily located at the site during construction. Permanent above or below ground storage tanks will not be installed as part of the proposed project. 21.Traffic Parking spaces added see below. Existing spaces (if project involves expansion) see below. Estimated total average daily traffic generated 3.530 trips. Estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated (if known) and time of occurrence 171 pm trips entering the redevelopment area. Provide an estimate of the impact on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. If the project is within the Twin Cities metropolitan area, discuss its impact on the regional transportation system. Parking Currently there are approximately 100 parking spaces in the downtown area. This estimate includes approximately 50 spaces comprised of on street parking and small off street parking lots as well as approximately 50 spaces for the Centerville Elementary School. The school itself is located north of and adjacent to the redevelopment area, but its primary parking lot lies within the redevelopment area. Per City Code Section 154.170, required parking for the proposed redevelopment consists of 748 spaces for the residential portion of the redevelopment (2 spaces/unit per City minimum requirements) and 378 spaces for the retail portion of the redevelopment (6 spaces per 1000 sq ft). The 50 school parking spaces will also be replaced. It is likely that 350-400 of the residential parking spaces will be constructed underground in lower level parking below buildings. 18 Based on the parking requirements, a total of 1176 spaces would be constructed, which adds 1076 new spaces over existing conditions. It should be noted that in the M-I Mixed Use zoning district, within which the project site is located, City Code allows the City Council to modify the minimum parking requirements as part of the site plan approval process. Traffic The proposed redevelopment project will increase the traffic volumes on roadways within the City. A traffic impact analysis of the proposed redevelopment scenario has been conducted in order to identify whether roadway and/or other transportation improvements will need to be undertaken. The analysis, provided in Attachment 2, attempts to identify the traffic related impacts of the redevelopment project. Identified impacts are then evaluated to determine what mitigation efforts need to be enacted so that transportation service can be provided at an acceptable level. The project area is shown in Figure 2 I -I of the analysis in Attachment 2. The roadways and intersections analyzed in the study were determined in conjunction with City of Centerville staff. The following intersections were examined as a part of this review: · Main Street & 20th Avenue · Main Street & Dupre Road · Main Street & Progress Road · Main Street & Centerville Road · Centerville Road & Sorel Street · Centerville Road & Heritage Street These intersections were analyzed for traffic volumes and approach geometry, both existing and proposed. The traffic analysis concluded that the proposed development \vill add vehicular trips to the roadway. It is currently planned to upgrade the Main Street corridor beginning in September 2007 and completing in July 2009. The system was analyzed for the year 2012, which accounted for both completion of the proposed development, and the improvements to the Main Street corridor. Based on that analysis, it \vas determined that the improvements being made to the Main Street corridor will adequately accommodate the expected increase in traffic volumes due to the proposed development. Further Traffic Information to be handed out at the Council Meeting. 19 22. Vehicle-related air emissions Estimate the effect of the project's traffic generation on air quality, including carbon monoxide levels. Discuss the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on air quality impacts. Note: If the project involves 500 or more parking spaces, consult EA W Guidelines about whether a detailed air quality analysis is needed. According to the air quality impact analysis completed by SBP Associates, Inc. (see Attachment 3), carbon monoxide (CO) levels are elevated near roadway intersections due to the emission of this pollutant from the vehicles idling and passing by the redevelopment area. The State of Minnesota has ambient CO standards that are designed to protect human health and the environment. The Standards are: . I-hour average: 30 parts per million (ppm); and . 8-hour average: 9 ppm. Concentrations near or above these levels are most likely to occur near intersections that have heavy traffic volumes and are severely congested. With the proposed area roadway improvements, severe congestion problems that could cause air quality problems are not expected to develop at the major intersections near the project. 23.Stationary source air emissions Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources of air emissions such as boilers, exhaust stacks or fugitive dust sources. Include any hazardous air pollutants (consult EA W Guidelines for a listing) and any greenhouse gases (such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide) and ozone-depleting chemicals (chloro-fluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons or sulfur hexafluoride). Also describe any proposed pollution prevention techniques and proposed air pollution control devices. Describe the impacts on air quality. Emissions from structures proposed at the site are not expected to be significant. 20 24.0dors, noise and dust \ViJI the project generate odors, noise or dust during construction or during operation? lYes _No If yes, describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities or intensity and any proposed measures to mitigate adverse impacts. Also identify locations of nearby sensitive receptors and estimate impacts on them. Discuss potential impacts on human health or quality of life. (Note: fugitive dust generated by operations may be discussed at item 23 instead of here.) Dust and noise will be generated by equipment and machinery during construction. Odors may also be generated from construcrion equipment exhaust. Equipment will include trucks, backhoes, graders, compactors, excavators, bobcats, cranes, loaders, cornpressors, and possibly de-watering pumps. Dust may be controlled by dai Iy cleanup of the construction site: water will be used to wet appropriate surfaces to reduce airborne dust when necessary. Noise and odor impacts from construction equipment will be controlled by ensuring the equipment is properly muffled and in good working condition, and by restricting the hours of operation to daylight hours, or those permitted by local ordinances. The project proceeds through residential neighborhoods and is adjacent to numerous residential yards. Construction of the project is anticipated to occur in phases over a five- year period. Phases of construction in anyone area are expected to be completed over one construction season, approximately seven month.., (May through November). SSP Noise Impact Analysis SBP Associates, Inc. (SBP) conducted a traCfic noise monitoring and modeling analysis Cor the proposed downtown redevelopment; the report is provided in Attachment 3. The modeling analysis used the MNDOT Minnoise computer model and traffic predictions prepared by Bonestroo. Additionally, SBP conducted noise monitoring at t\VO location.., near the project site. Predicted D({ytillle Noise Lerel Discllssion The rbults indicate that the modeled residential building receptor locations are predicted to have noise levels within the State standard for the year 2012< Locations R3 and R6 (shown on Figure I of the noise analysis in Attachment 3) are al or above the standards vvith 2030 lraffic volumes. This indicates that there would be some speech interference from the traffic noise for persons outside on the street side of these buildings during 2030 peak traffic periods. The predicted Jloise level changes between the existing and year 2012 result from additional traffic generated by the development and by other area growth. The noise level increase for this period is predicted to be 3 dBA or less at all modeled receptor locations. The MPCA considers changes of 3 dBA or less to be imperceptible. 21 Predicted Nighttime Noise Level Discussion Table 2 of the noise analysis (provided in Attachment 3) indicates that all modeled residential receptor locations, except location R 7, would have nighttime traffic noise levels above the Minnesota standard for modeled years 2012 and 2030. This standard is based on sleep interference for people sleeping in bedrooms with partially open windows. Residences in these areas should have year-round climate control and should be constructed to achieve an outdoor-to-indoor noise level reduction of 30 dBA. 25.Nearby resources Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site? Archaeological, historical or architectural resources? ..JL Y es _No Prime or unique farmlands or land within an agricultural preserve? ..JL Y es _No Designated parks, recreation areas or trails? lYes _No Scenic views and vistas? _Yes ..JLNo Other unique resources? _Yes ..JLNo If yes, describe the resource and identify any project-related impacts on the resource. Describe any measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. a) Archaeololrical. Historical. or Architectural resources The Minnesota Historical Society State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was contacted regarding the presence of documented cultural resource sites within the project area. According to the response received (see Attachment 4) numerous sites were identified and many appear to be located within the downtown redevelopment area. The City is in the process of obtaining information related to a cultural resources survey that was completed in the area for the proposed Anoka County CSAH 14 Reconstruction Project. b) Prime or Uniaue Farmlands According to Anoka County soils information, two soils in the project area are identified as prime farmland: Hayden fine sandy loam, 2-6% slopes and Nessel fine sandy loam, 1- 4% slopes. Two other soils are classified as prime farmland if drained: Dundas loam and Webster loam. In addition, one soil is classified as farmland of statewide importance: Hayden fine sandy loam, 6-12% slopes, eroded. Figure 8 shows the locations ofthe soils. Although a number of the soils in the project area are identified as important to farming, land within the project corridor is not used agriculturally. Most was developed long ago as residential or commercial property. c) Desismated Parks. Recreation Areas. or Trails There are no designated parks or recreation areas within the project area. However, Centerville Lake is adjacent to the project area and offers numerous recreational opportunities including boating, fishing, and swimming. A number of City parks are located within the vicinity of the project area and offer open spaces for recreation and picnicking. The largest of these, Laurie LaMotte Park, is located just to the south of the 22 project area and offers primary facilities for organized recreation activities, including a hockey rink, a skating rink, soccer fields, softball diamonds, and park buildings. Additionally, Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve is also within the vicinity of the project area. The Central Anoka County Regional Trail is planned to be located adjacent to CSAH 14 through the project area. Another designated trail, Rice Creek Chain of Lakes - Bald Eagle Regional Trail will run along Centerville Road and connect to the Central Anoka Trail. Park and trail users may experience minor impacts of odors, noise and dust during construction of the project. These impacts would be short term and are not expected to be significant. Measures discussed elsewhere (such as in Items 16 and 24) will minimize impacts. d) Scenic Views and Vistas There are no views or vistas officially designated as scenic in the project area. However, views of and from Centerville Lake can be considered scenic. Several townhome units are proposed in the northwest part of the project area on the shore of Centerville Lake where no structures are located currently, thus there will be a change in the views from and of the lake in this area. Overall, significantly adverse impacts to views are not expected because the proposed project is a redevelopment of an existing developed area. See item 26 for additional discussion regarding visual impacts. e) Other UniQue Resources Every summer Centerville celebrates the Festival of Lakes (Fete de Lacs) which includes a parade, fireworks, food, and entertainment. The parade proceeds through the downtown area and the festival itself is held in a park to the southwest of the redevelopment area. The parade route may need to be altered due to the redevelopment project but other impacts are not expected. 26.Visual impacts Will the project create adverse visual impacts during construction or operation? Such as glare from intense lights, lights visible in wilderness areas and large visible plumes from cooling towers or exhaust stacks? l Yes _No If yes, explain. While the project will cause none of the impacts listed above, it will result in a visual change to the shoreline of Centerville Lake where townhome units are proposed to be constructed. Overall building heights will increase compared to current conditions, but heights will be similar to the buildings that currently are located within the study area. Additional lighting as well as different types of lighting then presently used will result from the addition of commercial spaces and residential units. Trees may need to be removed for construction of commercial and residential spaces. Tree replacement is planned, but will not necessarily be completed in the exact location of tree removal. Instead, trees will be planted along boulevards and in locations that enhance overall aesthetics. 23 27. Compatibility with plans and land use regulations Is the project subject to an adopted local comprehensive plan, land use plan or regulation, or other applicable land use, water, or resource management plan of a local, regional, state or federal agency? ..x Y es _No. If yes, describe the plan, discuss its compatibility with the project and explain how any conflicts will be resolved. If no, explain. The project is subject to the City's adopted comprehensive plan including all recent amendments. The proposed development is consistent with the intent of the comprehensive plan as well as the City's downtown master plan. The downtown master plan design meets the Metropolitan Council's vision for developing communities to provide for more development within existing urban areas and provide growth at densities between 3-5+ units per acre. This development will exceed these desired minimums while providing a unique mixed use development that will provide a variety of housing opportunities, commercial and office uses in a traditionally designed downtown. The development will also provide housing choices and opportunities for the city to meet the Metropolitan Council affordable housing allocation over the next several years. The project is also subject to and will comply with the Rice Creek Watershed District Watershed Management Plan. 28.Impact on infrastructure and public services Will new or expanded utilities, roads, other infrastructure or public services be required to serve the project? ..x Y es _No. If yes, describe the new or additional infrastructure or services needed. (Note: any infrastructure that is a connected action with respect to the project must be assessed in the EA W; see EA W Guidelines for details.) A new trunk water main, updated storm sewer, and reconstruction of existing streets are proposed as part of this project. Street and utility reconstruction will occur in advance of or in conjunction with construction phases to accommodate the new buildings. The existing City utilities in the area will be modified to accommodate the increased density and more intense use of water. Storm drainage features will be added to treat and regulate runoff quality and quantity, respectively. Again, since the new use will not vary substantially from the existing use, there will not be a significant increase in storm water runoff, but we will have the opportunity to provide quality and quantity regulation where none existed before. 24 29. Cumulative impacts Minnesota Rule part 4410.1700, subpart 7, item B requires that the RGU consider the "cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects" when determining the need for an environmental impact statement. Identify any past, present or reasonably foreseeable future projects that may interact with the project described in this EA W in such a way as to cause cumulative impacts. Describe the nature of the cumulative impacts and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to cumulative impacts (or discuss each cumulative impact under appropriate item(s) elsewhere on this form). Cumulative impacts are not expected to result from the project, nor is it expected to interact negatively with any existing or future development. Anoka County is currently undertaking the reconstruction of CSAH 14. This reconstruction was not initiated by the proposed redevelopment. Anoka County State Aid Higway (CSAH) 21 is proposed to be reconstructed in conjunction with the redevelopment of downtown Centerville. The reconstruction will be confined to the redevelopment area. The City, independently or through agreement with the developer, will reconstruct side streets within the study area during this same period. 30.0ther potential environmental impacts If the project may cause any adverse environmental impacts not addressed by items 1 to 28, identify and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation. Impacts in addition to those discussed previously in this EA Ware not anticipated. 31.Summary of issues Do not complete this section if the EA W is being done for EIS scoping; instead, address relevant issues in the draft Scoping Decision document, which must accompany the EA W. List any impacts and issues identified above that may require further investigation before the project is begun. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these impacts and issues, including those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions. The project proposer must acquire the previously mentioned permits and approvals prior to proceeding with construction. Temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control plans and a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) must be prepared. Issues that will require additional investigation include: . The wetland identified within the redevelopment area must be delineated. The delineation report will need to be submitted for review and approval to the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) as the Local Governmental Unit (LGU) responsible for 25 administration of the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). Any impacts proposed to the wetland will require prior approval by the RCWD and mitigation at a 2: 1 ratio will be required prior to impacting the wetland. · Demolition of existing structures to allow for redevelopment will generate waste materials, some of which may be considered hazardous (such as asbestos containing materials). Additional investigation will be needed to ensure that demolition of buildings and disposal of materials/debris is conducted in an appropriate manner in accordance with federal, state and local regulations. · Additional information will be obtained regarding the structures identified in the project area by SHPO's database. RGU CERTIFICATION. The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED Environmental Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor. I hereby certify that: · The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. · The EA W describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9b and 60, respectively. · Copies of this EA W are being sent to the entire EQB distribution list. Signature Date Title Environmental Assessment Worksheet form was prepared by the staff of the Environmental Quality Board at the Administration Department. For additional information, worksheets or for EA W Guidelines, contact: Environmental Quality Board, 658 Cedar St., St. Paul, MN 55155, 651-296-8253, or http://www.eqb.state.mn.us 26 Mhmesota Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program Box 25 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-40_ Phone: (651) 259-5109 Fax: (651) 296-1811 E-mail: Iisa.joyal@dnr.state.nm.us August 13,2007 Ms. Lisa Fay Bonestroo, Inc. 2335 West Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 Re: Request for Natural Heritage information for vicinity of proposed Centerville Downtown Redevelopment Project, DIN R22W Section 23, Anoka County NHNRP Contact #: ERDB 20080122 Dear Ms. Fay, The Minnesota Natural Heritage database has been reviewed to determine if any rare plant or animal species or other significant natural features are known to occur within an approximate one-mile radius of the area indicated on the map enclosed with your information request. Based on this review, there is 1 known occurrence of a rare species or native plant community in the area searched (for details, please see the enclosed database printouts and the explanation of selected fields). Following are specific comments for that element. Following are specific comments for only those elements that may be impacted by the proposed project. Rare feature occurrences not listed below are not anticipated to be affected by the proposed project. . Blanding's Turtles (Emydoidea blandingii), a state-listed threatened"species, have been reported from the vicinity ofthe development area. Blanding's Turtles spend much of their time in shallow wetlands (1-3 feet deep), but they nest in open, sandy uplands up to 1 mile from wetlands. Nesting is in June and eggs hatch in September, at which time young turtles enter deep wetlands where they over-winter in soft sediments. Factors believed to contribute to the decline of this species include wetland drainage and degradation, development on upland nesting areas, and possibly collection for the pet trade. In addition, because of the tendency for Blanding's Turtles to travel long distances over land, they are often forced to cross roads in developed areas. Many of the records we have of Blanding's Turtles are from turtles killed crossing roads. For your information, I have atlached a Fact sh~t anu a flyer about the Blanding's Tmtk. The fact sheet is intended to provide you with background information regarding habitat use, life history, and reasons for the species' decline, as well as reconunendations for avoiding and minimizing impacts to this rare turtle. As you will note, there are two lists of recommendations. The fIrst list contains recommendations to prevent harm to turtles during construction work, and is relative to all areas inhabited by Blanding's Turtles. Please refer to this first list of reconunendations for your project. The second column expands on the frrst column, and contains greater protective measures to be considered for areas known to be of state-wide importance to Blanding's Turtles, or any area where greater protection for turtles is desired. Your project area is not within one of these priority areas. The flyer. which should be given to all contractors worldng in the area, contains an illustration and description of the B landing's Turtle. as well as a summary of the recommendations provided in the fact sheet. DNR Information: 651-296-6151 · 1-888-646-6367 · TTY: 651-296-5484 · 1-800-651-3929 An Equal Opportunity Employer {\ .., Printed on Recycled Paper Containing a Minimum of 10% Post-Consumer Waste The Natural Heritage database is maintained by the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, a unit within the Division of Ecological Resources, Department of Natural Resources. It is continually updated as new information becomes available, and is the most complete source of data on Minnesota's rare or otherwise significant species, native plant communities, and other natural features. Its purpose is to foster better understanding and protection of these features. Because our information is not based on a comprehensive inventory, there may be rare or otherwise significant natural features in the state that are not represented in the database. A county-by-county survey of rare natural features is now undenvay, and has been completed for Anoka County. Our information about native plant communities is, therefore, quite thorough for that county. However, because survey work for rare plants and animals is less exhaustive, and because there has not been an on-site survey of all areas of the county, ecologically significant features for wbich we have no records may exist on the project area. The enclosed results of tbe database search are provided in two fonnats: short record report and long record report. To control the release oflocational information, which might result in the damage or destruction of a rare element, both printout formats are copyrighted, The shalt record report provides mre feature locations only to the nearest section, and may be reprinted, unaltered, in an Environmental Assessment Worksh~et, municipal natl!ral resource plarl, or report compiled by your company for the project listed above. If you wish to reproduce the short record report for any other purpose, please contact me to request written permission. The long record report includes more detailed locational information, and is for your personal use only. If you wish to reprint the long record report for any purpose, please contact me to request written permission. Please be aware that review by the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program focuses only on rare naturalfeatures. It does Qat constitllte review or approval by the Department of Natural Resources as a whole. If you require further information on the en v iron men tal review process for other natural resolllce- related issues, you may contact your Regional Environmental Assessment Eco!ogist, Mike North, at (320) 255. 4279. An invoice in the amount of $72.33 will be mailed to you under separate cover within t\vo weeks of the date of this letter. You are being billed for the database. search and printouts, and staff scientist review, Thank you for consulting us on this matter, and for your interest in preserving Minnesota's rare natural resources. Sincerely, l6 ~I ! ~ .~ " , 1" - /\.. {V-,,/ -"v) 6\'\/' (lJC' Lisa A. Joyal . Endangered Species Environmental Revie\v Coordinalar end: Database search results Rare Feature Database Print-Outs: An ExplAnation of Fields Fact sheets: Blanding's Turtle The Natural Heritage & Nongame Research Program recently adopted a Ilew database system called Biotics. As a result of this change, the layout and contents of the database reports have been revised. Many of tile fields included in the new reports are the same or similar to the previous report fields, however there are scvera~ new fields and some of the fIeld definitions have been slightly modified. We recommend that you familiarize yourself with the latest field explanations. Rare Features Database Reports: An Explanation of Fields The Rare Features database (Biotics) is part of the Natural Heritage Infonnation System, and is maintained by the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, a unit within the Division of Ecological Resources, Minnesota Department ofNahual Resources (DNR). **Please note that the print-outs are copyrighted and may not be reproduced without permission ** Field Name: [{<ull (non-abbreviated) field name, if different]. Further explanation of Held, -E- Element Name and ace #: [Element Name and Occurrence Number). The Element is the name of the rare feature. For plant and animal species records, this field holds the scientific name followed by the common name in parentheses; for all other elements (such as native plant communities, which have no scientific name) it is solely the element name. Native plant community names correspond to Minnesota's Native Plant Community Classification (Version 2,0). The Occurrence Number, in combination viith the Element Name, uniquely identifies each record. EO Data; [Element Occurrence Data]: For species clements, this field contains data collected on the biology ofthe Element Occurrence* (EO), including the number of individuals, vigor. habitat, soils, associated species, peculiar characteristics, etc. For native plant comrnunity elements, this field is a summary text description of the vegetation of the EO, including stnrcture (strata) and composition (dominantlc.haracteristic species), heterogeneity, successional stage/dynamics, any unique aspects of the community or additional noteworthy specie;; (including animals). Note that this is a new field and it has not been filled out for many of the records that were collected prior to conversion to the new database system. Some of the information meeting the field definition may be found in the General Description field. EO ID#: [Element Occurrence Identification Number]. Unique identifier for each Element Occurrence record. EO Rank: [Element Occurrence Rank], An evaluation of the quality and condition of an Element Occurrence (EO) from A (highest) to D (lowest). Represents a comparative evaluation of: 1) quality as determined by representativeness of the occurrence especially as compared to EO specifications and including maturity, size, numbers, etc. 2) condition (how much has the site and the EO its(;lfbeen damaged or altered from its optimal condition and character). 3) viability (the long-tenn prospects for continued existence of this occurrence - used in "Hiking species ci!ly), EO Ranks are '1ssigned based on recent fieldwork by knowiedgeabie individmis. Extent Known?: A value that indic"tes whether the full extent of the Element is known (i.e" it has been dctcnnined through field survey) at that locaticm If null, the value has not been detennined. -F- Fede@LSllitus: Status of species under the U.S. Endangered Species Act: LE = erdangered; LT = threatened; LE,L T = listed endangered in . part of its range, listed threatened in another part cfits range; L T,PDL = listed threatened, proposed for delisting; C = candidate for listing, If null or "No Starus" the species has no federal status, First Observed Date: 1)ate that the Element Occurrence was first reported at the site in format YYY Y-MM-DD. A year follo\ved by "Pre" indicates that the obserlcd date was sometime prior to the date listed, bllt the exact date is unknown. -G- General Description: General description or word picture of the area where the Element Occurrence (EO) is located (i.e" the physical setting/context surrounding the EO), including a list of adjacent communities. Vi'hen available, information on surrounding land use may be included. Note that the infonnation tracked in thisfie1d is now more narrowly defmed than it was in the old database system, and some of the information still in this field more accurately meets the definition of the new EO Data field. Weare working to clean up the records so that the infonnation in the two fields corresponds to the current field explanations described herein. Also note that the use of uppercase in sentences in this fic:ld is not significant but rather an artifact oftransfemng data from the old database system to the new system. Global Rank: The global (i.e., range-wide) assessment of the relative rarity or imperilment of the species or community. Ranges from G 1 (critically imperiled due to extreme rarity on a world-wide basis) to GS (demonstrably secure, though perhaps rare in paris of its range). Global ranks are detennined by NatureServe, an intemational nehvork of natural heritage programs and conservation data centers. -L- :La~Obsen's:-,LDate; Date that the Element Occurrence was last observed to be extant at the site in fODnat YYYY.MM-DD. Last Survey Date: Date of the most recent field survey for the Element Occurrence, regardless of whether it was found during the visit. If the field is blank, assume the date is the same as the Last Observed Date. Location Description: County or Counties in which the Element Occurrenc~ was documented followed by Township, Range, and SectioJ1 information (not listed in any particular order). Each unique Township, Range, and Section combination is s~parated by a comma. In some cases, there "are too many Township, Range, and Section combinations to list in the field, in which case, the information will be replaced with, ''Leg~1 description is too lengthy to fit in allotted space". " -M- Manalled Area(s): Name ofthe federally, state, locally, or privately managed park, forest, refuge, preserve, etc., containing the occurrence, if any. If this field is blank, the element probably occurs on private land. If "(Statutory Boundary)" occurs after the name of a managed' area, the location may be a private inholding within the statutory boundary of a state forest or park. MN Status: (Minnesota Status]. Legal status of plant and animal.specie"s under the Minnesota Endangered Species Law: END = ' endangered; THR = threatened; SPC = special concern; NON = tracked, but no legal status. Native plant communities, geological features, and colonial waterbird nesting sites do not have any legal status under the Endangered Species Law and are represented by a N/A. -N- NPC Classification (vl.5): Native plant community name in Minnesota's Native Vegetation: A Key to Natural Communities (Version 1.5). This earlier classification has been replaced by Minnesota's Native Plant Community Classification (Version 2.0). -0- Observed Area: The total area of the Element Occurrence, in acres, which is measured or estimated during fieldwork. Ifnull, the value has liot been determined. Ownership Type: Indicates whether the land on which the Element Occurrence was located was publicly or privately owned; forpublidy owned land, the agency with management responsibility.is li&ted, if known. -8- Site Name: The name ofthe site(s) where the Element Occurrence is located. Sites are natural areas ofland with boundaries detennined and mapped according to biological and ecological considerations. ' " Survey Site #fNarne: The name ofthe survey site, ifapplicable, where the Element Occurrence is located. Survey sites are sites that provide a geographic framework for recording and storing data, but the,ir boundaries are npt based,on biological and ecological considerations. Minnesota County Biological Survey site numbers, if applicable, are also listed in this field. Survey Tvoe: Information on the type o,f survey used to collect information on the Element Occurrence. Survevor(s): Name(s) of the person(s) that collected survey information on the Element Occurrence. State Rank: Rank that best characterizes the relative rarity or endangerment ofthe taxon or plant community in Minnesota. The ranks do not represent a legal status. They are used by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to set priorities for researc~, inventory and conservation planning. The state ranks a're updated as inven,tory information becomes available. 81 = Critically imperiled in Minnesota because of extreme rarity or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extirpation from the state. S2 '" Imperiled in Minnesota because ofrarity or because of some factor(s) making it very vulnerable to extirpation from the state. S3 = Vulnerable in Minnesota either because rare or uncommon, or found in a restricted range, or because of other factors making it vulnerable to extirpation. S4 = Apparently secure in Minnesota, usually widespread. S5 = Demonstrably secure in Minnesota, essentially ineradicable under present conditions. SrI = Of historical occurrence in the state, perhaps haVing not been verified in the past 20 years, but suspected to be still extant. An element would become ~H without the 20-year delay if the only known occurrences in the state were destroyed or if it had been extensively and unsuccessfully looked for. 8NR = Rank not yet assessed. 3U = Unable to rank. SX = Presumed extinct in Minnesota. SNA = Rank not applicable. 8#8# = Range Rank: a numeric range rank (e.g., S2S3) is used to indicate the range of uncertainty about the exact status of the element. S#B, S#N =' Used only for migratory animals, whereby B refers to the breeding population of the element in Minnesota and N refers to the non-breeding population of the element in Minnesota. -V~ Vegetation Plot: Code(s) for any vegetation plot data that have been collected within this Element Occurrence (Le., either Releve Number or the word "RELEVE" indicates that a reI eve has been collected). * Element Occurrence - an area ofland andlor water in which an Element (Le., a rare species or community) is, or was, present, and which has practical conservation value for the Element as evidenced by potential continued (or historical) presence andlor regular recurrence at a given location. Specifications for each species determine whether multiple observations should be considered I Element Occurrence or 2, ' based on minimum separation distance and barriers to movement. Data Security Locations of some rare features must be tr~ted as sensitive infonnatian because widespread knawledge of these lacations could result in harm to the rare f~tures. Far example, wildflawers such as orchids and econamically valuable plants such 8S ginseng are vulnerable to. exploitation by collectors; other species, such as bald eagles, aie sensitive todisturb8l1ce by observers, For this reason, we prefer that publications not identitY the precise locations ofvulnersble species. We suggest describing the location only to. the nearest section. If thiS is not acceptable far your purpases, please call and discuss this issue with the Endangered Species Enviranmental Review Caordinatar far the Natunil Heritage and Nangame Research Program at (651) 259-5109. Revised 412006 Environmental Review Fact Sheet Series I Endangel'ed, 'I'hl'cutcncd, and Slleeial COnCC1']I Species ofllinnesota Illnnding's rrUl"tle (Emllrloitlea blmulhif/it) Minnesota Stahls: Federal Status: Threatened none State Rank': Global Rankl: 82 04 HABITAT USE Blanding's tmtles need both wetland and upland habitats to complete their life cycle. The types of wetlands used include ponds, marshes, shrub swamp", bogs, and ditches and sh'eams witb slow-moving water, In Milmesota, Blanding's turtles are pril11alily marsh and pond inhabitants. Calm, shallow water bodies (Type 1-3 wetlands) with mud bottoms and abundant aquatic vegetation (cattails, water lilies, etc.) are preferred, and extensive marshes bordering rivers provide excellent habitat. Small temporary wetlands (those that dry up in the late SUlllil1Cr or fall) are frequently used in spring and summer -- these fish less pools are amphibian and inveltebrate breeding habitat, which provides an important food source for Blanding's tmiles. Also, the wanner water of these shaI10wer areas probably aids in the development of eggs within the female turtle Nesting occurs in open (gmssy or bmshy) sandy uplands, often some distance from water bodies. Frequently, nesting occurs in traditional nesting grounds on undeveloped land. Blanding's turtles have also been known to nest successhllly on residential property (especially in lovi density housing sihmtions), and to utilize disturbed areas such as f31m fields, gardens, Imder power lines, and road shoulders (especially of dirt roads). Although Blanding's turtles may travel through woodlots during their seasonal movements, shady areas (including forests and lawns with shade trees) are not used for nesting. Wetlauds with deeper water arc nceded in times of drought, and during the winter. Blanding's turtles overwinter in the muddy bottoms of deeper marshes and ponds, or other water bodies \vhere tbey are protected from freezing. LIFE RISTOn y Individuals emerge from overwintering and bcgin basking in late March or carly April on wann, sunny days. The increase in body temperahtre which occurs during basking is necessary for egg development within the female tlllile. Nesting in Minnesota typically occurs during June, and females are most active in late afternoon and at dusk. Nesting can occur as much as a mite from wetlands, The nest is dug by the female in an open sandy area and 6-15 eggs are laid. The female tmile reillms to the marsh within 24 hours of laying eggs, After a development period of approximately tWo months, hatchlings leave the nest from mid-August through early-October. Nesting females and hatchlings are often at risk of being killed while crossing roads between wetlands and nesting areas, In addition to movements associated with nesting, all ages and both sexes move betwecn wetlarids from April through November. These movements peak in June and July and again in September and October as turtles move to and from ovenvintering sites. In late autumn (typically November), Blanding's turtles bury themselves in the substrate (the mud at the bottom) of deeper wetlands to overwinter, IMP ACTS / THREATS I CAUSES OF DECLINE . loss of wetland habitat through drainage or flooding (converting wetlands into ponds or lakes) . loss of upland habitat through development or conversion to agriculture . hwnan disturbance, including collection for the pet trade* and road kills during seasonal movements . increase in predator populations (sh.',mks, racoons, etc.) which prey on nests and young *rt is illegal to possess Ihis threatened species. Minnesota DNR Nalural Heritage and Nongame Research Program Environmental Review Fact Sheet Series. Blanding's Turtle. 2 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AVOIDING AND MINIMIZING IMPACTS These recommendations apply to typical construction projects and general land use within Blanding's tUrtle habitat, and are provided to help local governments, developers, contractors, and homeowners minimize or avoid detrimental impacts to Blanding's turtle populations. List 1 describes minimum measures which we recommend to prevent harm to Blanding's turtles during construction or other work within Blanding's turtle habitat. List 2 contains recommendations which offer even greater protec~ion for Blanding's turtles populations; tMs list should be used in addition to theflrst list in areas which are known to be of state-wide importance to Blanding's turtles (contact the DNR's Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program if you wish to determine if your project or home is in one of these areas), or in any other area where ~reater protection for Blanding's turtles is desired. List 1. Recommendations for all areas inhabited by List 2. Additio1lal recommendations for areas known to Blanding's turtles. be of state-wide importance to Blanding's turtles. GENERAL A flyer with an illustration of a Blanding's turtle ShOlild be Turtle crossing signs can be installed adjacent to road-. given to all contractors working in the area. Homeowners crosaing areas used by Blanding's turtles to increase public should also be infonned of the presence of Blanding's awareness and reduce road kills. turtles in the area. Turtles which are in imminent dan~er should be moved, by Workers in the area should be aware that Blanding's hand} out ofhanns wal. Turtles w ich are not in . turtles nest in June, generally after 4pm, and should be imnunent danger shou d be left undisturbed. advised to minimize disturbance if turtles are seen. If a Blanding's turtle nests in your yard, do not disturb the Jfyou would like to provide more protection for a nest. Blanding's turtle nest on your prope~, see ''Protecting Blanding's Turtle Nests" on page 3 0 this fact sheet. Silt fencing should be set up to keep turtles out of Construction in potential nestin~ areas should be limited to construction areas. It is critical that silt fencing be the period between September 5 and June 1 (this is the removed after the area has been revegetated. time when activity of adults and hatchlings in upland areas is at a minimum). WETLANDS Small, vegetated temporary wetlands (Types 2 & 3) should Shallow portions of wetlands should not be disturbed not be dredged, deepened, filled, or converted to stonn during prime basking time tmid momin~ to mid- aftemoon water retention basins (these wetlands provide important in May and June). A wide uffer shoul be left alon~ the habitat during spring and sununer). shore to minimize hwnan activity near wetlands (bas ing Blanding's turtles are more easily disturbed than other turtle species). Wetlands should be protected from pollution; use of Wetlands should be protected from road, lawn, and other fertilizers and sesticldes should be avoided, and rull-off chemical run-offby a vegetated buffer strip at least 50' from lawns an streets should be controlled. Erosion wide. This area should oe left unmowed and in a natural should be prevented to keep sediment from reaching condition. wetlands and lakes. . . . ROADS Roads should be kept to minimum standards on widths and . Tunnels should be considered in areas with concentrations lanes (this reduces road kills J>y slowing traffic and of turtle crossings (more than 10 turtles per year ger 100 reducing the distance turtles need to cross). meters of road), and in areas of tower density if t e level ofroad use would make a safe crossi?S: impossible for turtles. Contact your DNR R~ional ODgame Specialist . for further infonnation on wil ife tunnels. Roads should be ditched, not curbed or below ~de. If Roads should be ditched, not curbed or below grade. curbs must be used, 4 inch hi~h curbs at a 3: 1 s ope are . preferred (Blanding's turtles ave great difficulty climbing traditional curbs; curbs and below grade roads trap turtles on the road and can cause road kills). Minnesota DNR Natural HCIlIBge and Nongame Research Program Env;rolllnenlal Review FriCt Sheet Selies. Blanding's Tunle 3 ROADS cont. Culverts between wetland areas, or between wetland areas Road placement should avoid separating wetlands from and nesting areas, should be 36 inches or greater in adjacent upland nesting sites, or these roads should be diameter, and elliptical or flat-bottomed. fenced to prevent turtles from attempting to cross them (contact your DNR Nongame Specialist for details). Wetland crossings should be bridged, or include raised Road placement should avoid bisecting wetlands, or these roadways with culverts which are 36 in or sreater in roads should be fenced to prevent turtles from attempting diameter and flat-bottomed Of eUiptical (raised roadways to cross them (contact your DNR Nonfcame Specialist for discourage turtles from leaving the wetland to bask on details). This IS especially important or roads with more roads). than 2 lanes. Culverts under roads crossing streams should be oversized Roads crossing streams should be bridged. (at least twice as wide as the normal width of open water) and flat-bottomed or elliptical. UTILITIES Utility access and maintenance roads should be kept to a minimum (this reduces road-kill potential). Below-ground utility construction sites should be returned to original grade (trenches can trap turtles). LANDSCAPING AND VEGETATION MANAGEMENT Terrain should be left with as much natural contour as As much natural landscape as l?ossible should be preserved possible. (installation of sod or wood ChiPS, ~avingJ and planting of trees within nesting habitat can ma e that habitat unusable to nesting I3landing's turtles). Graded areas should be revcgctated with native glasses Open space should include some areas at higher elevations and forbs (some non-natives [orm dense patches through for nesting. These areas should be retained 1Il native which it is difficult for turtles to travel). vegetation, and should be cotU1ected to wetlands by a wide corridor of native vegetation. Vegetation mana2:ement in infreouentlv mower! areas -' I Ditches anrlntilitv 8C(,;;~S m8ns ~h(\llln not h" t\1ow"rl rw sUCh as in ditcheS; along utility access roads, and under ~lanag~ci'th-r;~il;"' u'se 'oicl;e~c~i~~ 'If \;egctatfo~ .. -.. '" power lines -- should be done meclumically (chemicals management is required, it should be done mechanically, should not be used). V-lork SllOUld occur fall through as infrequentt as possible, and fall through spring spring (after October I <t and before June 1 'I). (mowing can 'll turtles present during mowing, and makes it easier for predators to locate turtles crossing I roads). Protecting Blanding's Turtle Nests: Most predation on turtle nests occurs within 48 hours after the eggs are laid. A fter this time, tbe scent is gone from the nest and it is more difficult for predators to locate the nest. Nests more than a week old probably do not need additional protection, unless they are in a particularly vulnerable spot, such as a yard where pets may disturb the nest. Turtle nests can be protected from predators and other disturbance by coveling them with a piece of wire fencing (such as chicken wire), secured to the ground with stakes or rocks. The piece of fencing should measure at least 2 ft. x 2 ft., and should be of medium sized mesh (openings should be about 2 in. x 2 in.). It is ve1:Y important that the fencing be removed before AUlo!ust III so tbe young tutiles can escape from the nest when they hatch! REFERENCES IAssociation for Biodiversity Information. "Heritage Status: Global, National, and Subuational Conservation Status Ranks." NatureServe. Version L3 (9 April 2001). htto://www.natureserve.orglranking.htm (15 April 2001). Coffin, B., and 1. Pfamlmu]Jer. 1988. Minnesota's Endangered Flora and Fauna. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 473 pp. Minnesota DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program Environmental Review Fact Sheer Series. Blanding's Turtle. 4 REFERENCES cont. Moriarty, J. J., and M. Linck. 1994. Suggested guidelines for projects occurring in Blanding's turtle habitat. Unpublished report to the Minnesota DNR. 8 pp. . Oldfield, B., and J. J. M~riarty. 1994. Amphibians and Reptiles Native to Minnesota. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 237 pp. Sajwaj, T. D., and J. W. Lang. 2000. Thermal ecology of Blanding' s turtle in central Minnesota. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 3(4):626-636. '\ Compiled by the Minnesota Department olNatural Resources Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, September. 2001 Endangered Species Environmental Review CoordinalOl', 500 LaJayelle Rd., Box 25, St. Palll, MN 55 J 55/651-259-5109 CAUTION )uu.- BLANDING'S TURTLES MAY BE ENCOUNTERED IN THIS AREA The unique and rare Blanding's turtle has been found in this area. Blanding's turtles are a State Threatened species and are protected under Minnesota Statute 84.095, Protection of Threatened and Endangered Species. Please be careful of turtles on roads and in construction sites. For additional information on turtles, or to report a Blanding's turtle sighting, contact the DNR Nongame Specialist nearest you: Bemidji (218-755-2976); Brainerd (218-828-2228); New Ulm (507-359-6033); Rochester (507-280-5070); or St. Paul (651-772-7978). DESCRIPTION: The Blanding's turtle is a medium to large turtle (5 to 10 inches) with a black or dark blue, dome-shaped shell with muted yellow spots and bars. The bottom of the shell is hinged across the front third, enabling the turtle to pull the front edge of the lower shell firmly against the top shell to provide additional protection when threatened. The head, legs, and tail are dark brown or blue-gray with small dots of light brown or yellow. A distinctive field mark.is the bright yellow chin and neck. Tllustratioll by Don Luce, from Turtles in Minnesota, Natural History Leaflet No, 9, June 1989, James Ford 8ell Museum or Natural Hlstory SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A VOIDING AN.n MINIMIZING IMP ACTS TO BLANDING'S TURTLE POPULATIONS (see Environmental Review Fact Sheet Series for full recommendations)' · A flyer with an illustration of an adult Blanding's turtle should be given to all contracto~s working in the area. Homeowners should also be informed of the presence of Blanding's turtles in the area. · Turtles which are in ,imminent danger should be moved, by hand, out of harms way. Turtles which are not in innninent danger should be left undisturbed to continue their travel among wetlands and/or nest sites. '. If a BI~nding's turtle nests in your yard, do not disturb the nest, and 'do not allow pets near the nest. · Blanding's turtles do not make good pets. It is illegal to keep this threatened species in captivity. · Silt fencing should be set up to keep turtles out of construction areas. It is critical that silt fencing be removed after the area has been revegetated. · Small, vegetated temporary wetl~ds should not be dredged, deepened, or filled. · All wetlands should be protected from pollution; use of fertilizers and pestiCides should be avoided, and run-off from lawns and streets should be controlled. Erosion should be prevented to keep sediment from reaching wetlands and lakes. · Roads should be kept to minimum standards on. widths and lanes. · Roads should be ditched, not curbed or below grade. If curbs must be used, 4'~ high curbs at a 3: I slope are preferred. · Culverts under roads crossing wetland areas, between wetland areas, or between wetland and nesting areas $hould be at least 36 in. diameter and flat-bottomed or elliptical. " Culverts under roads crossing streams should be oversized (at least twice as wide as the normal width of open water) and flat-bottomed or elliptical. · Utility access and maintenance roads should be kept to a minimum. · Below-ground utility construction sites should be returned to original grade. · Terrain should be left with as much natural contour as possible. · Graded areas shouid be revegetated with native grasses and forbs. · Vegetation management in infrequently mowed areas -- such as in ditches, along utility access roads, and under power lines -- should be done mechanically . (chemicals should not be used). Work should occurJall through spring (after October I~t and before June 1st). Compiled by the Minl/esota Departlllel/t of Natl/ral Resol/rces Na/llral Heritage and NOl/game Research Prograin, AI/gust, 200/ Endangered Species Environmental Review Coordinator, 500 Lafayeue Rd., Box 25, St. Pal/I, MN 55/55/65/-259-5/09 tervi{{e 'Estab{isfied 1857 ~ CENTERVILLE EAW Traffic Analysis Centerville Project Number: 000616-07162-0 SSP ASSOCIATES, INC. 652 of Vii ,u k~r S (fee, Suite 2 1'5 Sc Louis PHk. MN 55426 Pho nt': 952"9 2ll.15('O Fax: 6L2.677-32H Noise and Air Quality Impact Analysis Centerville Redevelopment EAW Centerville, Minnesota September, 2007 Noise and Air Quality Analysis Centerville EA W 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report evaluates the air quality and noise impacts related to the proposed development of the downtown area in Centerville, Minnesota. New buildings will be a mix of retail or commercial and multifamily housing. Retail and commercial space will be available on the first floor of buildings along Main Street and Centerville Road with condo style homes above. Surrounding blocks will be filled with townhomes. The proposed redevelopment is shown in Figure 1. 2.0 NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS SBP has conducted a traffic noise monitoring and modeling analysis for the proposed development. The modeling analysis used the MNDOT Minnoise computer model and traffic predictions prepared by Bonestroo. Additionally, SBP conducted noise monitoring at two locations near the project site. 2.1 Minnesota Noise Standards Minnesota Rules Chapter 7030 provide the Minnesota standards for noise. These standards describe the limiting levels of sound established on the basis of present knowledge for the preservation of health and welfare. These standards are designed to be consistent with sleep, speech, annoyance, and hearing conservation requirements for receivers within areas grouped according to land use activities. The Minnesota standards are as follows: 7 :00 AM to 10:00 PM 10:00 PM to 7:00 AM LIO Lso LIO Lso NAC-l (Residential) 65 60 55 50 NAC-2 (Commercial) 70 65 70 65 NAC-3 (Industrial) 80 75 80 75 LIO means the sound level which is exceeded for 10 percent of the time for a one-hour period. Lso means the sound level that is exceeded 50 percent of the time for a one-hour period. Sound levels are expressed in dBA. A dBA is a unit of sound level expressed in decibels and weighted for the purpose of approximating the human response to sound. Minnesota Statutes, Section 116.07, Subd. 2a, exempt noise from local and county roads from the requirements of these noise rules unless full control of access to the road has Page :2 ;1 ~ i~~ ' ,.._~ ' r " '17-"'; ~,;,,-:'_ ;i_~ ~ ~~<j/ ~~. I ;~~ ~";d '''"'1 .. V r' ..~,.. \v ~/ .11.. :,'''- .- ' '~ ....",. ~ ~ . ' ~" 1 J . ~,._ , , ):..L._ , " ~~ .J. '.~ I ,,",,~ '. .' ,', ,,, ~ :,,~ 'i~~ ';r?t , .. '" "_r7~~_;- " "f .; ; .. i} ...... i~ ~"'T ~~:f ... II ., z. '. f/ . A',,. .; Jjf:it -/:11: . -;-' J . ~ .:;;.t.. '>l -- . -- ~~.. ~h r ~t : _"~'f.' !t~, 1.1., J':i 'if( I "11' .>~.~ J ~~J?' rt~ ' t,,, , . j} ,,,,'"I, ~.,..,> ;i:~l'~/(~' . ~ QJ ~ = ~ .~ ~ !4 tJ' ~,,~\~ ,1 :~,- ~, ... :~ "'. .0' .. ,~tr(1' .~~' ~, /"'~~'" - ~ " ~,' . ~~~ -.::~, .:.,]I<-.! _ , :.,,, J"-.4<,,,-.:.. .... . " , V';....~.. ........,~' ~ _ .c!...... ..' ; ~ _ :,~ t .. ~ f'-":''<-~-''';'['""~~'''...,-c:v '1 ' ~ ~~ ! -. i\;.."'.' ~". L ~t. ""fl)~ ~ ,w~* J$.. L ..:,;;,.'L?1;,t':;~,~; !*~ ~i 4 ,~. ._~ L_~:,~,' I ' ;~-:~;;2I l.:~~~;-=~-'t~ I >,~ if ~~::~. 'c;;,: I; ~':1:l;Ptji.J ~."......... .1 . I - .--'-...:'-.-:-.~~..~d.-d"1,.;.., ;.~ 'i7.' ~.-,-~"' .'. '1~ ,. ~ } 'I," ~ H~'_,_ -j-,~.r~' ...... " " '" - i J ".~ l ;_~ ",-,'--:......t....-J ~~ ,,; 1 ~\..,~.~~-~f-" ~ " '. ".'" " -........-~.,. I ::: _ ~., .':::n^" (.,~- ~~:.:.."..,., f'~ -- rf:'l'-" "-'I:,~":~~"cc ,',".> eLJ~I~ . " ~ U.I],.~.,..j- :::i ~"':~~" ~~-~ ~~ :~4r ~:' I e ~. ~! ~~r~" : ~. ~~ :;:';"J"~ 1-;.,;:,.. ~':~. t., ~_..J -- :L..""7'~.JJt" ". ..~:' 'I.\" / <-~_____~"___~ -;" ~'-.!'~.~ '_ ~~ 'r ~''''.~ ,_ '-,- __' "'T_~' '" ~ ~'~_, :J'>.<:.:tS--~ -;!~ ~ ~.s.. "~-I').~ ,',_ L cj -C.c',' ',; ',.."'-, -.",'" ;: ';:l ~ ttt-<....~,,6";.~' ,..,...... '.' -2:.. '. .......... '.'''''''''1'''. ""'fa.,",.;;o~-.i~~. ,,':".c, "A.'" ...~. .,," '" ~ ; ~ ~ fr~~h! . I')" ."11 ~~_.n r !r-~" .':~tF~R"F' .. , ',.if "'"~-'~~~"~,~. . .t'.. .Q..: _ . .;' ~,r~!.1.- ..', ~ f'.>;.,.'" ,/":"..J............"'. ,','H" "",~"', . "..~~ ~...".".t;~ ~, ~,r;~'~~~ <.. ,~'i.' r~~{~ . ~L.=,'\ . Y 1!t".,.,,' -:~. " .~~.-.~ '" €-.,,-,--;,r ~;Z) ~~,t;;:3:'.";~~' ,PJ~t ':' fiJJ' I . 'C.. .?/:;'. .~, )f I. v ~~_.- . {'~~' . ..... JoLw" '. ,.~)I..'.~.'._.,.'" ":...~.. J t ~Tf::;',. C;,J'-''Jj ~r~~;;' '~"""~'. L. ~. ~ : ., '. d..< ": ~~ ~ .,.,. Y~,,':. ,.. .-' -._;:t,~~):!,.~ iI., ~'"t~ :,:"~&~:~~~~~;~~~ ,:-,.' ~ ~~;"~'<' '? "":..;', Y ';,;"<';' j;~'t;~"i~.;/~; ,Vl>~ !..'r J' '", li .,r- i~~~J ~ ~ 'r ", ~ :- ... /, ra ... " ,.. ii " - E 'S ~ ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ EO f ~, z -= ::~ -, - ,- -' - ~ ". ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ E "" '- -..; ~ ~ ~ '-.' )1 ... ..;; ~ -::: -.' -' - ~ F2 '~ ... :::1 .::;: ~ ..... ,... ~ ~ ~ -. ~ -- '"~. ... -2 U') '" -.;;: - ~. ..... ,'~ -- "" -.:..' - ~ :;: " ~. 'tI' e:.> ~ .r; "'- ". ~ -": .... :;;: :r. ~ ~ ; L" '-' (J ..... ~ ..... g ..... I , - - - ~ "" ... ::.:.. ... ..:. .~."" C'J ,.,: r -' -. ~, - "" c, -C " ;r::;. <: -., '" '.--" ""1 " C, ~;-' "" ':.\. ~- <i U 0 ~ (!) J: ~ C. 0) W - "") ., Noise and Air Quality Analysis Centerville EA W been acquired. While this exemption likely exempts the noise from the area roadways from the Minnesota noise rules, the rules do provide a basis for evaluating the appropriateness of areas along the roadways for specific land uses. For example, the daytime standards for NAC-l areas are based on speech interference, and the nighttime standards for NAC-l are based on sleep interference in bedrooms with partially open windows. 2.2 Noise Monitoring and Modeling Comparisons In order to help define existing project-area noise levels, and to check calibration on the Minnoise computer model, SBP conducted monitoring at two locations near the proposed development site. The monitoring locations (Ml and M2) are along Main Street and Centerville Road, respectively. The locations are shown in Figure 1. Traffic counts were conducted during the monitoring periods and the data was entered into the Minnoise model to compare the actual monitored noise level to the modeled noise level. The following table presents the results of this comparison: T bl 1 N' M 't . R Its d C t M d r a e - Olse om ormg esu an ompanson 0 o emg Decibels, A-Weighted Monitored Modeled Difference Location Date Time LIO Lso LIO Lso LIO Lso Ml 8/24/07 2:03 to 59 53 58 53 1 0 3:03 pm M2 8/24/07 3:18 - 57 49 58 51 1 2 4: 18 pm The modeled noise levels are in relatively good agreement with the monitoring results. 2.3 Traffic Noise Modeling Results U sing the Minnoise computer model and traffic and roadway information provided by Bonestroo, SBP estimated existing and post-development noise levels at receptor locations on the proposed site. The receptor locations are shown in Figure 1. Receptors R I - R9 represent residential buildings. Receptors C 1 - C6 represent buildings with first floor commercial uses (upper floor residential). Noise levels were analyzed for the existing (2007) and post-development years, 2012, and 2030. SBP also estimated the change in noise levels that would occur along roadways serving the redevelopment area due to the growth in traffic volumes between 2007 and 2012. Page 3 Noise and Air QuaHty Analy~is Centerville EA W 2.3.1 l\Iinnoise Model The Minnoise model is a modified (modified by the Minnesota Department of Transportation) version of the Federal Highway Administration's Optima/Stamina model that is used to predict noise levels from highway projects and to assist with the developmem of noise barriers. 2.3.2 Model Assumptions Noise level predictions were based on the following data and assumptions: · The noise analysis was completed for the peak afternoon rush hour and the peak nighttime hOUL · Traffic data for existing conditions and years 2012 and 2030 for the study was generated by Bonestrooo · Shielding from natural or man-made baniers was not considered. . The analysis assumed acoustically soft ground cover between the roadvv'ay and all receiver locationso . A vehicle mix of two percent heavy trucks and two percent medium trucks was used for the analysis. . Constant vehicle speeds of 30 mph on Main Street and Centervil1e Road were used for the modeling analysis. 2.3.3 Modeled Noise Levels and Discussion Tables 2 and 3 provide the results of the tr3ffic noise modeling analysis for daytime and nighttime peak hours. Predicted Daytime Noise Lel'el DiscLlssion The results indicate that the modeled residential building receptor locations are predicted to have noise levels within the State standard for the year 2012. Locations R3, and R6 are at or above the standards with 2030 traffic volumes. This indicates rhat there would be sorne speech interference from the traffic noise for persons outside on the street side of these buildings dUling 2030 peak traffic periods. The predicted noise level changes between the existing and year 2012 result from additional traffic generated by the development and by olher area growth. The noise level increase for this period is predicted to be 3 dBA or less at all modeled receptor locations. The ~1PCA considers changes of 3 dBA or less to be imperceptible. Predicted Nighnime Noise Lerel Discussio!l TJole 2 indicates that all modeled residentiall'eceptor locations. e.\cept location R7 would have nighttime traffic noise levels above the ~vlinl1esota standeml for modeled years 2012 and 2030. This standard is based on sleep interference for people sleeping in bedroorns \Vltl1 pclrtially lipen \vinelovvs. Residences in the,,::, :1I'ca" should have ye'lr-nHmd + Noise and Air Quality Analysis Centerville EA W climate control and should be constructed to achieve an outdoor-to-indoor noise level reduction of 30 dBA. 3.0 Air Quality Impacts Carbon monoxide (CO) levels are elevated near roadway intersections due to the emission of this pollutant from the vehicles idling and passing by. The State of Minnesota has ambient CO standards that are designed to protect human health and the environment. The Standards are: . I-hour average: 30 parts per million (ppm); and · 8-hour average: 9 ppm. Concentrations near or above these levels are most likely to occur near intersections that have heavy traffic volumes and are severely congested. With the proposed area roadway improvements, severe congestion problems that could cause air quality problems are not expected to develop at the major intersections near the project. Page 5 5S"<I" "<I" L() "<I" M lD "<I" "<I" "<I" "<I" "<I" M L() L() "<I" C) ....J ::;iJ ,... - -~ ,... P\ ;::N M M M M M N M N N M N M M M '-' ~ ....J ~ C'J -' (""I -- oco CD CO CO "<I" CO ,.... "<I" ,.... CO ,.... O"l CO CO ,.... ....J'L() L() L() L() L() L() L() L() L() L() CD L() L() L() CD -- OL() "<I" CD L() 0 CD I'-- N I'-- L() O"l CD CD CD O"l ....:J(O (0 (0 (0 CD CD L() CD L() CD CD CD CD CD CD -' r, 0 ("'I 0,...- N M N ,.... M N N N ,.... N ,.... M M N lIJ U ....J ~ ,... 0 0,...- ,.... N ,.... ,.... N ,.... C\! ,.... ,.... ,.... ,.... N N ,.... ("1 ....J - ~ N -. ~L() "<I" CD CD N CD m N O"l L() m I'-- CD CD m ....JL() L() L() L() L() L() "<I" L() "<I" L() L() L() L() L() t() 0"<1" N L() M CO L() CD ,.... CD "<I" I'-- L() L() L() I'-- ("I ....:JCD CD CD CD L() CD L() CD L() CD CD CD CD (0 CD - M 0"<1" C'~ M "<I" ,.... M I'-- 0 I'-- "<I" I'-- CD M M I'-- ....J'L() L() L() L() lD L() "<I" L() "<I" L() L() L() L() L() L() ::;(j ::: ~ DC'!') ,.... M C'J r~ M cD O"l L() M CD "<I" M M CD :r: ....:J'-D CD (0 CD '.n CD cD L() L() CD CD '-D CD '-D CD .- X W - c:... I ~ C) r- N Ci') ~ LO (D f'-. CO m ,-- (\J (Y) 7 L() BI :::::: [( [( [([( [[ [( a: [( [( U U UU U ~ ~ ,.,.. - -:::: ~ '" ~ ;;. C) ....J C) ~ i C) E .- ..... ;- .~ .... C'l C) C) C) - .... - .:~ ," ~ ~ p ,... C) a "0 ~ ZJ C) ~ C) ',~ :r: '- ZJ U D.., u "0 ::l U .c > C) ~ ::: ~ ~ ..::: ::: u > 0 ,... '- C) ~ :r: 0 -0 z' -- ~ >-. ::l 0 ~ 3 2 "-::l ," , 2 ,~ U 5 < ;:::: z -' .0- ," e '- '- D.., <2 B D.., ::l :r: "0 e u ::: ~ -0 ~. '- -- 5 '- -" u -B VJ :r: ~ ...... C) 0 ~ ZJ 0 U Z .c u f- ~ ::l 0 '~ C) :r: "0 ~ v .9 ,... ::: ." ~ -- :::l :r: '- N .. C) I :r: e '~ -' < u -- '- 2 z ." "0 U 3 .5 ,... e ...- ::: .,... u -5 C) > -5 0 3 ~ ::l ~ ~ ." u .r; -- '- C) ." 2 ,... z; ~ '- C) z; 0 :r: C) c:... ~ > C) ::: C) () 2 C) C) z; :r: C) ." -5 ~ ~ 2 ,... ~ ~ 5 ::: '- ,... :r: ,... ~ ~ '" ;:; () ,... - ." ;:: C) "0 C X .:.; C) ~ z; >-. ." C) :/'; J .:.L. ." oJ 1ilC') "'""'" "'""'" "'" ","LO","C')","It)","",""," ~ -.J s:= ~ ..c U oC') C')"," C')C')"," C')C')C')C')C')C')","","C') 0 ..] M 0 C"l 0"," C\I "'" "'" ..... "'" r-- ..... r-- "'" r-- <0 "'" "'" r-- .::lit) It) It) It) It) It) "'" It) "'" It) It) It) It) LO It) oC') ..... "'" C\I r-- "'" It) O'l It) C') <0 "'" "'" "'" <0 0 ..]<0 <0 <0 <0 LO <0 It) LO LO <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 C"'l 0 C"l 0..... C\IC\I .....C\I C\I C\lC')C\I.....C\IC\IC\IC\IC\I It) ~ -.J t: ~ ..c U 0..- .....C\I .....C\IC\I ..-C\I ,.... T- ,..... T- C\IC\I ..... C"l ..] .- 0 C"l OC\l 0 C\I ..... O'l C\I It) O'l It) C\I It) C') C\I C\I It) .::lit) It) It) It) "'" It) "'" "'" "'" It) It) It) It) LO It) 0..... O'l C\I 0 <0 C\I C') CO C') ..- "'" C\I C\I C\I "'" r.t.l C"l ..]<0 It) <0 <0 It) <0 It) It) It) <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 Q,l - ~ 0 Q,l C"l Q,l 0..- CO 0 0 r-- 0 C') <0 C') ..- C') ..... 0 0 C') r.t.l .::lit) "'" It) It) "'" It) "'" "'" "'" It) It) It) It) It) It) Q Q,l Ot: 5 -5 00 CO 0 O'l "'" 0 C\I <0 C\I 0 C') ..- 0 0 C') .... "l ..]<0 It) <0 It) It) <0 It) It) It) <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 .... .- ~ >< CIJ .... Q,l 0 Q,l fr 0 u T""(\JC')<:::tLOc.DI"--COQ')T""(\JC')<:::tLOc.D Il) ~ a:a:a:a:a:a:a:a:a:oooooo .. ,-., < = "0 '-' ;z .c Z "0 M \1,/ :;"0 ==~ E-;~ OJ) _ 1U s:= .g ~'o. s:= ~ ~ ~~c;; ~u..8 ~.~ l- ll) 0 0 "Oa~ E Il) ,15 .s -5 .;;: eo-;:: -8.5 ~ .- > I- ~ ~ g "'''0 00 rJ'J ...... ~ >-. :3 Il) ~ 0 ~ ~ I- ....."0..8 ~ u8B ~ I-.~ Z .S; a I- ~ 0 ..sEa CIl Il) 0.. "O..c ~ .... ~ Il) ~ E .... ]o~ ~ <I:: ~ r.f.l1l)-5 <1.l CIl ell CIl'O ~ '0 s:= ~ Z Il) ~ ..c Il) .s r-< s:= ~-d~ ~~"O .s -g B '<::'~- ~eIl.e <1.l C"l ~ a I ~. .c U :3 ~ ~ ~ eoZ ~ '2 Il).~ Il)..c t: ..c ..... j;;; ......~;.:= <1.l:a Il) ~ .~ -5 ..o~~ ~ ~ E ~ ca ell ~ <1.l <1.l ~~3 ..c '" .... .... 8 Il) CI:l .jo"ol r./'1 ~ fr'o CIl > U ::: ~ ~~~.g '" ca <1.l.s '0 '13 -5 ~ ::: .... ~ ::: ~ ~ 0 Il) ~ ~ <l:: g. ~oo..~ ~ u ~_ ~ Il) ~.:3 "O..c><t:: 1) r-< <1.l ~ "0",>-.0.. ~~~; Page lof2 Fay, Lisa From: Cinadr, Thomas [thomas.cinadr@mnhs.org] Sent: Thursday, August 16,20079:13 AM To: Fay, Lisa Subject: RE: Centerville Downtown Redevelopment Attachments: Archaeology.doc; Historic.doc THIS EMAIL IS NOT A PROJECT CLEARANCE. This message simply reports the results of the cultural resources database search you requested. The database search produced results for only previously known archaeological sites and historic properties. Please read the note below carefully. For further information contact Kelly Gragg-Johnson by phone at 651-259-3455 or email at kelly.gragg-johnson@mnhs.org. Archaeological sites and historic properties were identified in a search of the Minnesota Archaeological Inventory and Historic Structures Inventory for the search area requested. Reports containing the results of the search are attached. The result of this database search provides a listing of recorded archaeological sites and historic architectural properties that are included in the current SHPO databases. Because the majority of archaeological sites in the state and many historic architectural properties have not been recorded, important sites or structures may exist within the search area and may be affected by development projects within that area. Additional research, including field survey, may be necessary to adequately assess the area's potential to contain historic properties. With regard to Environmental Assessment Worksheets (EAW), a negative known site/structure response from the SHPO databases is not necessarily appropriate information on which to base a "No" response to EAW Question 25a. It is the Responsible Governmental Unit's (RGU) obligation to verify the accuracy of the information contained within the EAW. A "No" response to Question 25a without written justification should be carefully considered. If you require a comprehensive assessment of a project's potential to impact archaeological sites or historic architectural properties, you may need to hire a qualified archaeologist and/or historian. Please contact the SHPO by phone at 651-259-3450 or by email at mnshpo@mnhs.org for current lists of professional consultants in these fields. The Minnesota SHPO Survey Manuals and Database Metadata can be found at http://www.mnhs.org/shpo/survey/inventories.htm 9/612007 Page 2 of2 Tom eil/ad,. Survey and Information Management Coordinator Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office Minnesota Historical Society 345 Kellogg Blvd. West St. Paul, MN 55102 651-259-3453 (voice) 651-282-2374 (fax) -----Original Message-m- From: Fay, Lisa [mailto:Lisa.Fay@bonestroo.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15,20071:23 PM To: Cinadr, Thomas Cc: Meyer, Benjamin L Subject: Centerville Downtown Redevelopment Tom, We are assisting the City of Centerville with an EAW for their proposed downtown redevelopment project. Will you please check your records to see if there are any cultural resource issues we should address? The project location information is below. '-1.-__1. . ._.. Illdlll<.. yuu, Lisa Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Section 23 Lisa Fay Tel 651-604-4866 lisa. fay@bonestroo.com .:t; Bonestr 9/6/2007 rI1 = Q .- ~ = ~ Q ~ aJ ~ .- 00 ,.... = ~ .- OJ:) Q ,.... Q aJ = ~ ~ '-c < r.:I o Cl ..... ~ ..... 'l> ~ I:l.; "" tl ~ :z: ('l :J 0 ... ~ 8. ~, ~ ~ '>< .:l = c3 .~ :.a ~ - :i ..; ..I: = .S! C. 'C ~ .. Cl .:l tiS :3 en en en <( <( <( .. '" 01 f ~ '" "-' ~~j ~ l.... \) j r'=:o ~ S- U S c:J :s: -+- ~ \() 1 '----'- <--'- ~ \0 \I I' ~ ~ "-I -.::t ("f"l M i:: N 0 0 '" -< is .~ '" .. rIl .. .:l .. 01 = 0' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :i :i ~ ~ :z: en Z c.i .. rIl <"l <"l <"l ('l ('l ('l .. ~ = 01 .:=: ('l ('l ('l ('l ('l ('l c:i.. ;l: Eo< - - - <"l <"l <"l 11 ~_:~~ ~~ V '- '- 'l ..> 0 ..J ~ ;; ~ g s o ..c ..c ~ ~ ~ 0 .E u ~ ~ ~ e ~ II> _2 -;;: :- ~ ~ C; g g ~ ~ t-., .:l ~ J ~ ~ '---' tiS = ">~ v.i ~ < ~ -.c ..... .... '" .. :::I .. ~ 1 >. <"l lrl """ \C ~ ... 0 ~ :z: = !'\ .:l = ~ .g tiS ~ N ~ U ('l :::I .::: ~ 0.) ~ :::s +-J () 0.) +-J .~ ...c: () ~ ~ ............ >-.. ~ o +-J r./). .~ ~ .. " ..Q S ::: z Q ::> C " .. ::: .... ;;;ol o Cl ~ .... U ~ Z .... .. o C. <:.l e::: rJ:; c.; 00 p en .. ~ .. 01 ::: CI " " '" " ~ ;; =' c. ~ """ rJ:; '" ;;;ol ,., Q Cl < ;;;ol ::s < z >< ... ~ ;;;ol :::.. o .z:: :::.. I:': ~ o = -< .... &-< Z ;:l o u ~ .;;: .. " c " u Q.; - == rJJ Z ~ o ~ ;... Eo-< - U o o U > u Z .0:: ::I: .;, X ?::i Z .0:: ~ ';;: '-< ~ B U ~ Z ;i '1 "" z r. t'l t'l N r. ~ 2 "-< :; o r- oo o r- /1:- 2 ::l .::: U ,~ ] " u " ;> " ';: " c:: " o rIl t'l o o U > u Z .0:: ~ 'E " c " u 3: z r. t'l ~" t'l r. -0 ~ ~ 'E ~ c:: " U ~ ~ c:: ';3 :a U '5 '" '5 -;a 'G 2) c:: E o u t() o o U > u ~ ::I: t() o o t'l Z <t ~ ';: '-< " c " u 3: z ::: z r. t'l t'l t'l r. ~ ciS rI5 ::: ::: ::: ;3 ';3 ';;3 :a :a :a .- l.r1 o::t o ;::l r- r- r- +:;;t'.:=f 1;l ::l E -c g u > u Z .0:: ::I: , t() o ?'l Z <t ~ oE () c () u ~ Z ;i Z r. t'l t'l t'l r. or. C () E ~ [ S " .::: r- o o U > u ~ :!: .;, o o t'l Z <t ~ Ot 2J ::: u U 3: z ;i z r. t'l t'l ~~ ;:;; 00 g u > u Z .0:: :!: .;, X N Z <t ~ ';: t) c () u 3: z ;i z r. t'l ~,' t'l r. ~ ::: '2 :a r- oo -c ;;i:. i;l ::l o .::: r. u > U Z .0:: :!: .;, o o t'l Z .0:: ,g ';: 9 c:: " U ~ z ;i z r. t'l t'l t'l r. ~ ~ ;3 :a 0'0 -c ,:\ ~ ::l o .::: .". o U > u Z .0:: :!: .;, o o t'l Z .0:: ~ ;: g 5 u 3: z ;i z r. t'l '" t'l r. ,- Vl :: " :;E >< 0'0 -c \-,~ " en ::l o .::: t() 'D o 0 U U > > u u Z Z <t .0:: :r: In o ?'l Z .0:: ~ oE ~ c:: () U 3: z ;i z r. t'l ~,' t'l C'1 ~ ::: ;3 :a t() 0'0 -0 A*~ WJ ::: :9 '5 ~ ~ "0 :a j :!: .;, o o t'l Z <t :3 ,. '-< " c u U 3: z ~ z r. t'l t'l '" ;:;; -0 =' ~ 'E u c () U 7 t'l ~ ::l E r- - o U > u ~ ". C'1 .;, g N ~ 'E " c u U 3: z :h z r. t'l ~~ N ~ ';a :a 0'0 o r- 1;l ::l E 00 - o U > u ~ :!: t() g N Z .0:: ~ ;: Fj C " u ~ z JJ z r. '" t'l N r. .,; ~ or. or. 2 WJ o :t 7 t'l r- /, S E " 2 ,~ 0'0 o U > u Z .0:: :!: .;, o o t'l Z .0:: ~ 'E " c () u ~ Z uJ z r. t'l N t'l '" .,; ~ en or. U Oil o :t 00 t'l r- -It -, " en ::l o .c o t'l o U > u ~ :!: .;, o ?'l Z <t ::5 ';: ~ B U 3: z uJ z '" '" t'l t'l r. ~ ::: ';3 :;s r-- r. r-- ;t, 1;l ::l o .::: N o U > u Z .0:: :!: t() o o N Z <t ,g ';: 1) c u U ~ z :h z '" t'l ~., N C'1 ~ ::: 'a :a t() 7 r- A 1;; ::l E t'l r. t'l N o 0 U U > > u u Z Z <t <t :!: .;, o o N Z <t ~ '?= g B U ~ z :rJ z ~ N N ~, U) ~ 'a ':;j :a :;s '" ~ S ~ '" 1;; ::l E :r: .;, g N Z <t ~ ';: '-< () c () u 3: z uJ z r. N N N ,... ;>, ... " ;) := " U " ;> () ;: () c () o rIl 7 t'l o U > u Z <t r' '" .;, o o N ,g ;: ... " c " u 3: z :I: VJ r. N ~, ~, 0"\ ~ cI5 ::: c:: ;3 ';;3 :;s :a 00 7 0'0 -0 r- r- S ~1 u '" ::l o .c t() t'l o U > u Z .0:: :r: .;, o o N Z <t ~ ;: .9 c:: " U ~ ;<;: "" VJ C'1 N N N M " en ::l E -0 N o U > u Z .0:: :!: t() o o N Z <t ~ 't " c " u ~ z uJ VJ M N t'l ,.., C'1 c/l ;;3 :;s :+ r- .*- 1;l ::l o :r: '" '5 o .J oS S is ~ j r-- N o U > u Z .0:: ::c .;, x N Z .0:: ,g ';: ~ E3 U ~ z :rJ VJ r. ~, t'l N M ~ ';; :;s N 7 r- .~~ * " en ::l o :r: oS -g " o oS c:: c:: o ~ j N '- o 00 N o U > u Z <C () 00 '" Il. :r: .;, o o N Z <t ~ '?= g " u ~ z uJ VJ M N N N '" :Zi ::: '2 :;s o 7 r- r- o o t'l ..0 " en ::l E en ::l b1J ::l .0:: >; " "0 ~ ::l .::: f- ... .. I to ~ j g ti u ~ .. ... Q g. CIl =: N ..... 0 N 0) ~ 01 0 - "" '<t \0 l"- 00 01 0 g N "" ~ I:l. N "" M "" "" M M 8 "" ;g ;g ;g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u u ~ u ~ u u u u u u u u u > > > > > > > > > > > > u u u u u u u u u u u u u u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :5 ~ :I: :5 :I: :5 :5 :5 ~ :s :s :s :s :s - - .;, 8 .;, .;, .;, .;, .;, a l/'l .;, .;, ~ .;, .;, ~ 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 8 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0) 0) 0) ~ 0) 0) ~ ~ ~ ~ ::::l S ::::l S ::::l ~ '~ '~ '~ 'E ~ 'E '~ ~ '~ .~ .~ '~ '~ ~ B B ~ 8 5 8 = 5 = 8 l'i 8 8 = 5 8 a 0) a j;;) u u u u u '" ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l! z z z z z ~ z z ~ !! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :i ~ ~ ~ :i ~ 01 ell ell ell ell ell ell ell ell ell ell ell ell ell tIl y M M M "" "" M "" ~ "" "" M M M "" .. N N N N N N N N N N N N N [/.l &'0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N = N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~ =- - - - - - - - ;;:; - - - - - - ~ "" M M "" "" "" "" '" "" M "" "" "" Eo< [/.l ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1~ .. J ~ 8 ~ < 5 u -d -d ~ -.. -0 -d -0 llI:: llI:: -0 llI:: llI:: llI:: "g :3 llI:: ~ ~ :3 ~'~~~ci5'~'~~ ~ 8 8 cS ] 8 8 8 '<t 00 l"- l"- l"- l/'l l"- 01 NO\OI~OOOOOOOO l"- 0 0 \0 0 0 0 ~*~ ~~~; ~ ~ llI:: ~ tj l"- 8 N ~ - ., = bO = -< ~ rl R -0 -0 -0 llI:: llI:: llI:: -0 ~ 0) ~ llI:: ,- S 'E j ~ B u 8 8 l/'l ;;t N l/'l g 0 ~ ~ ~~~{ ~ ti5 v.; ~ .ij .ij ~ ::!1 ::!1 !! ~ ~ bO bO bO ~ ~ ~ 8' ~ ~ ~ ~ l t ~ ~ ~ ~ O~ ~ a ~ 0) ] 0) 0) - I I 0) 1 0) u ~ [ ~ ~ ~ ~ g 10 j ~o ~ e ~ ~ ~ U bO I:l. ~ ell ~ ~ y ~ y 2 8 222 STATE OF MINNESOTA SEVEN COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA ib EAW PROJECT AREA ANOKA COUNTY CITY OF CENTERVILLE PROJECT LOCATION MAP FIGURE 1 I ~ I I NOT TO SCALE li~~~~ 4- Bonestroo AUGUST 2007 _OWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT EAW CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MN c C\I / .' -./') .!.-----:)---E;-I- .. ,\' ,~.. " -J ~c ..' ---r ,.-, ~ " \ '!: ~~ - -;-'..- ....- -- i jl .' .'.,: ~ lo..." < . .. . . .. .- Lake ~ Ii iI · l\ l. " .:0 " . ~ r - " r 'I o " n . .1: . ~-::---:- _",-,' . II .' · ~;'~'.. JI ./. "/l" ..\".~._.:....",:::-,-. I h" , , . . I. .;. 1\ " ,"';'"''':''' ,;""'- ... /J ~ v ---.. - .--1---. ~() . - o 500 (i~~~ ~ Bonestroo AUGUST 2007 USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP FIGURE 2 _OWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT EAW CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MN D EAW BOUNDARY I j SCALE IN FEET 7.5 MIN USGS TOPO 10 FT CONTOUR INTERVAL 1:\616\61607162\Cad\Dwg\EAWJIGURES[1 ].dwg ;;- n 0 n ~ ...... 0 0 OJ :<! :E ./ Z ,. OJ Z " me OJ 0 n 0 "TI ~ a n 0 m m :E "'U & ~ I z z -I f l a. ~ ./ :;0 "'U 0 m m i . " :;0 s;: l '" 0 ./ < C ~ ...... m ~ ~ r < z a I r m ~ i -." m a Gi r c ~ 0 ::<J 3: . '" "'0 ~ z 3: "- m " Z '" ~ . m j " )> ~ t! :E ,~ " " "'Tl ...... ~ G) )!j-Z-C ~ ~ m w 1:\616\61607162\Cad\Dwg\EAWJIGURES[1 ].dwg ?nnr; AFRTlil (i~:.':t~ -# Bonestroo .611~IIC:T ?nn7 I::XISTING CONDITIONS FIGURE 4 ....OWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT EAW CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MN D EAW BOUNDARY ~ BUILDING REMOVED ! I SCALE IN FEET o 150 D EAW BOUNDARY D PARCEL BOUNDARY . MN DNR PUBLIC WATERS . NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY . WETLAND (TO BE DEUNEATED) ~ CLEARWATER CREEK ~ . (ANOKA/WASHINGTON COUNTY JUDICIAL DITCH #3) . WESTVIEW ST SOREL ST Cl Cl Cl c:l a: a: '" z w '" --' w 0 --' c:l "- ~ "- Cl 0 0 w c:l Cl ~ Q. Z W u HERITAGE ST WETLANDS AND PUBLIC WATERS DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT EAW CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MN 1 I o 150 SCALE IN FEET 1:\616\61607162\Cad\Dwg\EAWJIGURES[ l].dwg FIGURE 5 (i~~,!< # Bonestroo AUGUST 2007 \ \ ~OCR ~ \..P<IZ~V- ~ \ \ WESTVIEW ST - f--- - f--- ~ I ~- "' 17 MAIN ST / CSAH 14 \. ~) \.. II r-- - II I ( ~ SOREL ST GO / 0 0 0 0:: 0:: 0:: Vl 0~ 'j Z w Vl ...J W 0 ...J U. - ;;: 0:: u. (9 0 0:: 0 ~ 0:: (9 Z 0- W ~ U "- HERITAGE ST ~ I-- = / - / \OJ E ,J' I' .f s ~ ~ \ /} ....HORELAND BUFFER ZONE FIGURE 6 (i!~!~ uOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT EAW D EAW BOUNDARY ! 0 150 CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MN c==J PARCEL BOUNDARY I I -# 100' SHORELAND BUFFER I SCALE IN FEET Bonestroo 1:\616\61607162\Cad\Dwg\EAWJiGURES[1].dwg AIIr:IIC:;:T ?nn7 // \ '\ t-\OCR \..~~~1.1' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ -; WESTVIEW ST I-- - L-- - 4 MAIN ST / CSAH 14 ~ II r-- ~ I SOREL ST / 0 0 0 a: a: a: Vl rt z w Vl ...J W f2- ...J ~ a: "- l'l 0 0 w a: l'l I- Cl. z w U " HERITAGE ST I <J' I' of s LEMA FLOODPLAIN ZONE _OWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT EAW CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MN D EAW BOUNDARY o PARCEL BOUNDARY 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN ZONE 1:\616\61607162\Cad\Dwg\EAWJIGURES[1 ].dwg t;nn VI=AD J:'I nnnpl ATM 7n1\U= ~,~;j ,~{ ^' "'" B;~ ' ur tc"" At( IK FIGURE 7 I j o 150 I I SCALE IN FEET ~( ~~ (J : ,", '" ~) i^=~ I - 80 0~ '\ rP )= f-- co E ~ VL \ (i~= # Bonestroo AII~IIC::T .,nn7 ANOKA COUNTY SOILS SURVEY FIGURE 8 (i~~~ DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT EAW CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MN Ii~ ! I o 150 Af - ALLUVIAL LAND, MIXED, FREQUENTLY FLOODED Bm - BLOMFORD LOAMY FINE SAND Cu - CUT AND FILL LAND Du - DUNDAS LOAM Gc - GLENCOE LOAM . HdB - HAYDEN FINE SANDY LOAM, 2-6% SLOPES . HdC2 - HAYDEN FINE SANDY LOAM, 6-12% SLOPES, ERODED . HdD - HAYDEN FINE SANDY LOAM, 12-24% SLOPES . NeA - NESSEL FINE SANDY LOAM, 1-4% SLOPES . Wb - WEBSTER LOAM ~ Bonestroo AUGUST 2007 D EAW BOUNDARY D PARCEL BOUNDARY SCALE IN FEET 1:\616\61607162\Cad\Dwg\EAWJIGURES[1].dwg tervi{{e 'Establls/iel{ 1&':;7 1880 :Main Street, Centervitre, 'MW 55038 651-429-3232 orPtl:{ 651-429-8629 September 4, 2007 Dear Property Owner: The City Council has approved a contract for repair of the sidewalk in the right-of-way adjoining your property. This work is being done at the City's expense. The work will occur between September 5 and October 19,2007. The sidewalk panels that are being replaced are marked with paint. The contractor will leave a written notice at your door the day before he starts work in front of your property. In some cases the sidewalk panels are at driveway entrances. We require that you not drive across the new cement for five days after it is completed. It is important that the concrete attain full strength before it is subjected to vehicle traffic. Please remind everyone in your household, so no mistakes are made in this regard. If you have an automatic sprinkler system, please make sure that your system doesn't run for 12 hours after the sidewalk is installed. If the new sidewalks are damaged by vehicle traffic or water sprinklers, they will be replaced at the property owner's expense. During the construction, the police will not enforce the "no overnight parking" on your street. If you have landscaping, sprinkler heads, invisible fences or similar items in the right- of-way, we will do our best to protect them, if they are marked, but in any event the City will not pay to replace or repair these items. We appreciate your cooperation in getting this work done in order to keep our sidewalks safe. If you have any questions, you may call City Hall and we will get you the information that you need. Dallas Larson, City Administrator 'tJ-l \.-"" , -' Ii ~ I:b::f~~ ~ J:? D ~ Ll,t tr ' I~L _I < 7 iJIW-~6:;r ~~'B.::;;tftTIJ. -f ~ ~ > ,; JI~I'.#'I kl>~"'iJ I' '.I'iJ, / _ ~,- r-- Il~~ L~. ~- ~f'~:I-"'''::, ='1~. "1 rrOi'l ll.-'--.{, 5 Q; I-\J ~ ~ JL ~ , :;; <.., CIT'HIML I ,'. "'I!'1 I:,' - i! ~r 3 ": 1 I . ""'1 ~ ijCl.la' "'~;;r. '0~~, ,.' ~_. ~,~..7 21~~:J ~,~ .2'0 ~ ~ C-l J '. ~ 9 , - , 'r- . , ,,_. ~ .. ,. ",,.,. ~o 0, " ""!" ',- -"'.. i t ~ If ' .. '-:'~ >ill >t 'J '",' - .- " ., 25 , r !l';' - '"'1'1\ ""l'f'I" \' "oj , , J \' f.= ", 1. , ' 'I II ''L,~~ I 0 -.11...",.,,,,, ,1 ')f.- ; ~ J~ ',' .- iT" .,q.'...... /~. II ", ",,^UNCEYBAREJ:'~oI'!f" '_ v'-./ ~ /~-= " ~ ,_ -,~ 2 GARDENS ')~~~'. !:II Iff."h: ~~~D~)",~"1311WL~ !lfI9~~~:~716'" "".13 3 E ,t,fr, ^"';' · _ ", "''i, \@.'l fiillU' _ . .., . ~ - .~. ,~ ~ \":J~ ,;'Iie OWL . ~,~~..'. ,! /;,~ I 'll ~ ,\215 j,,,/~~,~ ~'~~ :r II .~ ~8!itL k~~: ~~~~~\.... -'-!UJa-J I ~';"",~ ~ '-I".~ '....,,~;~, . ~I ~ ,... - " ~ 0 11"", !y:::!.;{,< ".,. t":1....'!l 1 :12 1~\""1..~1 - 1t'ACl[;J.-~1~ .." I ~ "4 16 Ill"':u 1 2 I Ji U AU" , ~ _. , .. ~ .. .. " -- '-. " 14 15 " "' · , ~ _, , # . ,~, rrIIrO""-~'~.lI ill :Il.rn [[[US '1. , I ;"T uo:-....,';,,'r'($1. 1 ',J, . '~7\ , ~" '" !. \1O~" v'" 5 .' .!AT"'u .~ ,. 1 ,~ ," "';" "" Cli"l"i I.~ " "T''''' fOr i~.T\\ \ ~ ~h- 3'0..;. 14 I 1 I ~. In 01 I', -.,-~ ' . PR., ~'~ , ~ "~\~011 ~l.'!n; -'~~ '-'"- -'(VTIDTE ! ~. - ~~ ""i\ j~>-fl..<l- ' ,~J> J ~ ' '5 "J~, ~ 1'- Ior~ ~ "'" ~\"$'''' - f- ",,'" "I lin. ~ ' I;;:; /l : W,.... \~ V ' r< I.J-....;., · \.K ,\ ~ ~ ... .. ~ J' _ ~ "'.<;..{I, r "'? ~ ~ - 5 T,,-~ W'~>>-~I ~f'tq~ ~~L~I r---"111r I ~. 47 (~f)I1'cli ----.:::......~ 8 ~ ~ ::3 ~ ~ ~ -' :L ji C !:II >- z ,b ~l "'" -I -=- I'" ,(I. I~ 3 ltills ~6 III -011 ~"' : I -_." "" II~~ _ -r -.,: - "I _ o.teVlw)L _.._ :7'..-6 -~- I s..-- .-- .. -r-- --- -I'"- -- r _..... Ii' __,.. r _u.- - ~ A "I"\\~ "\....LI I · , ... ,''''''1.1.11.1., I 17L. ' " 1- "t.~-I-I-I.vr-I~I~I" :> f.-.....~ . t4f ~ ~ '..~' ~~.:.~IP~~':~~~~~ ~ / ~~ "~.l}' ~. ~ A. " ,p III ...... I' .&- t: ,L ..., ~J'~hl-;-t:\ L.."6' , .I." ----I'i I '; '.'1>11" ....;.... r.M~ ~~l~~.!."J 'J-tNr1I~1 l' 2 }t, ~~ -:- '. - 9- T:P:r 4 ,,-' -::::o_~- -r"";8i: 1_ J........... 'l~." "1 ..J' 1'(_ .2..! r~ I .. Ulp_lil" ~'~"",.").,7 ~" ,"" "1' ,r.'".."" "' I I /-ri I _ ;.M' . ~ u ~"'\ · ;..I! U .\..& lo.'\'I~ ~. ;~:::/ j')i "J. L~' " m,rn. 't. ~\o~~~~~ !Ile_~\;. iC"b.~~.. w.r~' ~;'I ...,J"~'FI~llli'.. 'JI} 'r-,' ~ ~~~~f"'~' "r~~' "~V:'.~ ~ ~ JuI 'JI~L~l"" 1 ~ ., t'l I _2 J "PAD' ,; I' J '\'~ !i;. '" ~ ,:",~,," = ';:,', ~ I --~..... ~ r-;r \' ........ I, "1 ~. . "l':.~ t:. ,~ ,\ H\ -::;.~, I I ~ ...f .:1 ',~ ,... ..... ." IT ' ~-- ~ ~l~~" ;,,-~,.lI -.Ii "IT" ,I ;+..l "". ",,;:, ~,........ -' -. -' i,U u --.! ~ ~ ~~- ~ ~. 1IIIC1.' LL.'.___':)..._" I 11: 1 i . _'il r+- In . '~ 1"rI. r" -'-- L !11"n : 1-: ~.II .11:1. :T ~~J ..; ~ , , Tr;=ql. Flln;;r1~ , 7o!.r, '"'Eri3l ;~~LJtI! ~I~__. c..t.. ~ 1_- 21125 GATEW..".,.,IJst!J.C ~~~t1..K AlWIS CL&HtMLCA __r_~ EATONJ.<.OHES c: ;NANlY J n31 BRL4N D_~ ?1312;;:11iUSf) ~ ..!.I .. ~I! ~ b"""'" 5 0.2l>111i25ZJ11 SJ)EED 0 ., I(';""POL Y :i:~TEfMU.E r 0 CSZ CENTtfMuE MN S!illlJ.B729 oiiEssp n311lR1AN OR ~=~= ~ ~~ ~NUM rJ1, CENTERWl.E NUGO ~ - USPS oUN& ~~ _BLDG _1ANIl TOTAL ~ _~FT ~SQFT EIl,ACRE TIIIG ~~~ 003 RESIlEN,IALSINliUO ~Y 1E<Dl IIlGJJ 21lml 1291 926 B_ Y LDT6 o I~ r.;;e-io,37 .... ~UNtTS ~-~:. ----:..--=--- ....---. - - - F~e!!~ ytD\\.~LI J d f-' '. t=~ ~Crl I . f- -, /-rl-- \"- >-v I ~ N ~~. . .~ L--- \ l-.;... ~ / ~ .-- 1-<~ r- ~ ~\ ~ . ~ \ 1/ _, r~cr{-sf I ~- YYN2 ~ .. N I i I . /, l"l \-')29111 i ~ V N f2 ~ ~I - 1 . 'I--~I- - 1 ___:= ..: L J " :, -. t'0 1 U 7 r- . ~\r-l '.L . \~ _I . ----1 ~ " _, 1" --: _ I-- _ _' .. " - - :.1 ~ u . .' ~ ,:= I _ ~ I -" - .ct . "'\\ ~'II..: L '_ fl'. ~ ....~;;.~.'\~=~~l~ J/_ ~ I- .-' I-- - - l- i- .....r-. f I ~' y' :-.. . )- .... - - ~ '. ~ ~ 'N 1- rJ N N ,1,l'~11-:r-1- I II II I ( ~ .. I. ::: .~ I' -, {II - ~-~~'-"". I 1,' . ~9-~ l1J .r~~ jl . . . ~ ~ I. . . (. 'ON IClINIlIJ t 'OHIClUCI J.1H/103 r- ~. - - -.---- -....-- - - - - - -J..- . J .- --- n lVl ~ I \-JL/ V/t::/ ~~ ~ ./\ r-- I / / >-::-Ol~ ~ \ ," ' 2J I If" .,".,.. '" -"<'I ,.II) 1\ ~~ ~~, f'" \\- Lj~ I,' " /, f ":' ".~' ~~ e, = . L~: ~~~'f} J f ~ '- ~ EBc~ ,', ==; .-=i :::'I)~~ ~- ill'" ~ _ ~ : '--:- ;~ . ~ 1;- r!Y tJ "- r _ r-- . -:-3. .' ~ 1r- . r- VJ __ I '--- ../ I I~. . ,.-- '-- I 'IYi \" . I-- r-- --;::i -MM.... ~ . I .:~' r - ~rt ~ _ -~..IIII I ~. . ~ . "-J~""H\ ~. FI . ~ t-1, -i ~ ----. . . /~;:rd-J. . r I ~ I '~'~~~~~t-- V -= tzJ. : 'Iov"'~, ' '~tR iF - - .......t'>..' VJ-.- _ .:::----=; '---~~-~lg ~0L1 \ 1\:= _ r " :' rl1l0" I:~ ~B~ 1 7 ~., .' lIIJIII ~ L - l F= ~ " ~ f r llIJIIID: ,=.; I -=== rf ~. -~ ~ ~ - ~~ ~ lum~~v = ~ 11j~ ~ IIDm -A\\r r-- , ~ .-- ........... "1 'I r: Beard Group e:t City of Centerville Paul Montain PO Box 472 Uno Lakes, MN 55038 September 5, 2007 Re: Centerville Property Sirs; A number of maps, plans, concepts, ideas and rumors are circulating throughout Centerville. I own 7082 Centerville Road (Trio Inn) and 7085 Progress Avenue and the vacant lot in the northwest corner of Progress and Sorel. I haved owned these parcels for almost 20 years. In the 20 years of my doing business within the City of Centerville, this is the fourth different plan I have seen for downtown. I wish you much success and happiness with your plan and the city's new plan. However, for the sake of clarity for yourselves and anyone who looks at your plans, you should not include any of my property in your planning. I will not be selling any of the property to anyone for about the next 20 years. When I do sell, it will be after I have become the longest held/owned bar in Centerville history (40 years) and this is my retirement property. Also, please note that I have taken great offense to everyone that does not have the backbone to talk to ~.II"Jjj? my property for their own self indulgence. pg[} tervi[[e 'Estn1ifislied 18S7 18110 'Main Strut, Cent/!,..,;[(e, 9.1~ 55038 651-429-3232 ur 'l-iv;. 65/-429-8629 August 29, 2007 Doug Fischer County Engineer Anoka County Highway Dept. 1440 Bunker Lake Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 Dear Mr. Fischer: I understand that Anoka County has awarded the contract for CSAH 14. I have asked for a recalculation ofCentervilIe's share based upon the bid award and assume that will be forthcoming shortly. The JPA agreement specified a payment schedule for the City's share, but that was based upon the assumption that bids would be taken in March or April. I don't think anyone expected that the delay to August. In order to allow us time to issue bonds or make other arrangements to fund our share, we propose that the second payment that would have been due in June be deferred to January. Thank you for considering this request. Yours truly, Dallas Larson City Administrator Cc: Kurt Glaser, City Attorney Mary Capra, Mayor Rhonda Sivarajah, Commissioner Andrew Witter, Anoka County Wire Politics - Senators worried about TV 'train wreck' - sacbee.com Page 2 0[3 . Cars . Homes . Jobs . Shopping Wire Politics: Wire Political News: I Wire Election NewsMore in this section Senators worried about 1V 'train wreck' By JOHN DUNBAR - Associated Press Writer Last Updated 11: 1 0 am PDT Thursday, July 26, 2007 WASHINGTON - On Feb. 18,2009, tens of millions of televisions that are not equipped to receive digital signals will become useless pieces of furniture. The government is spending $5 million to let owners know so they can do something about it - a sum critics say is too measly. While the government has committed $1.5 billion for viewers to spend on converter boxes that will translate digital signals for older televisions, it is largely relying on the broadcast industry to spread the word about the changeover. John Kneuer, chief of the federal agency tasked with ensuring a smooth digital transition, told the Senate Commerce Committee on Thursday that the government will be leaning heavily on broadcasters. "It's not only their own responsibility, it's in their own interest," said Kneuer, assistant secretary in the Department of Commerce and chief of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Some committee members were clearly worried about the transition. A poll released in January by the Association for Public Television Stations indicated 61 percent of respondents had "no idea" the digital transition was going to take place. There is a "high potential for a train wreck here," said Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash. A 2005 report by the Government Accountability Office said 21 million households - roughly 19 percent of the nation - rely on an antenna rather than cable or satellite to receive television signals. The digital transition, once complete, will provide better sound and sharper signals to television watchers. It also will make better use of the airwaves, freeing prime space in the electromagnetic spectrum that will be auctioned early next year for other uses. A number of organizations are concerned that many people, particularly the elderly, the poor and minorities, will be caught off guard when the change occurs. "These consumers will be confused, frustrated and angry that this important information and entertainment source in their home is no longer operational, through no fault of their own," said Nelda Barnett, a member of the board of the directors of the 39-million-member AARP. After the first of the year, the government will be making available to each household two coupons worth $40 each that can be used to buy two converter boxes. Congress has set aside $1.5 billion to pay for the coupon program. Initially, $990 million will be used to pay for coupons and cover administrative costs, which are capped at $110 million. An additional $510 million may be allocated, but those coupons are reserved for households that have only over-the-air television. 7/3012007 P.152 Wire Politics - Senators worried about TV 'train wreck' - sacbee.com Page 3 of3 But only $5 million has been earmarked for public education. The transition has already begun in some key areas. Cathy Seidel, chief of the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at the Federal Communications Commission, said that as of March 1 all television receivers shipped in the U.S. were required to have digital tuners. In April, the agency required retailers to disclose to consumers that televisions that can only receive analog signals are not equipped to receive over-the-air signals beyond Feb. 17,2009. Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., is concerned that consumers who don't get the word would take it out on their elected representatives. "They're not going to call you," she told Kneuer. "They're going to call me. And they're going to be mad." Dennis Wharton, a spokesman for the National Association of Broadcasters, said television station owners are highly motivated to get the word out. "Our very business is at stake here," he said. Wharton said stations will begin airing public service announcements worth "tens of millions of dollars" early next year. "Broadcasters will do our dead-level best to educate Americans on this transition," he said. TheSu('"1"'.ulK-ntoBee Unique content, exceptional value. SUBSCRIBE NOW! Sacbee Ad Links Buy a link here News I Sports I Business I Politics I Opinion I Entertainment I Lifestyle I Travel I Multimedia I Cars I Homes I Jobs I Shopping I Archives Privacv Policv I Terms of Use I Site Map I Advertise I Advertise Online I Guide to The Bee I Bee Jobs I ~ I RSS Contact Us I Subscribe I Manage Your Subscriotion I Sacbeemail Copyright @ The Sacramento Bee 2100 Q SI. P.O. Box 15779 Sacramento, CA 95816 (916) 321-1000 P.153 7/30/2007 COUNTY OF ANOKA Public Services Division HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD. N.W., ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304-4005 {763} 862-4200 FAX {763} 862-4201 Greg Anderson Project Representative Direct Dial Number (763) 862-4243 Cell Phone Number (763) 238-8966 September 5, 2007 RE: CSAH 14 (Main Street) Reconstruction Project, S.P. 02-614-24 Dear Resident: The reconstruction of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 14 is anticipated begin on Monday, Sept. 17, 2007. Work this fall will consist of tree removal, utility relocation, pond construction, bridge construction and soils correction through the swamp area between 1-35W and Mound Trail. This area of the project will be closed to thru traffic from September 2007 until approximately November 2008. A signed detour will implemented utilizing CSAH's 54(20th Ave.), 34(Birch St.), 49(Hodgson Rd.) and 23(lake Dr.). Construction is anticipated to continue throughout most of the winter. Entrances disturbed by the construction will be restored to an acceptable condition. Tree removal is anticipated to begin in mid September. Trees scheduled for removal will be marked by Anoka County before the contractor cuts them down. If you have specific concerns about trees in your front yard, please call me so we can discuss your concerns. I have been in contact with our Right of Way Department and have been made aware of any comments previously provided by property owners. Anoka County Highway Department Survey Crews have begun placing construction stakes on the project. These stakes, marked with colored flagging or paint, are used as reference points for the construction. These stakes do not represent the location of the new roadway. Please call me if you have questions about these reference stakes. We appreciate you not disturbing these stakes during construction. These stakes will be removed when they are no longer needed. Some of the temporary inconveniences that you will encounter include traffic delays, noise, dust, vibrations, and limited access to homes. Dust created by construction operations will be reasonably controlled using water. These inconveniences are unavoidable; however, they are temporary and will be minimized to practical extents. We appreciate your patience in advance and your consideration of worker safety For residents with mail boxes on Main Street, the Contractor will coordinate with the local Postmaster to deliver your mail to a temporary mailbox for the duration of this project. At the end of construction, your old mailbox will be attached to a new safety support and relocated close to its present location. The old support is your property and will be left on your land for your use or removal. I will be the Anoka County Project Representative. I will be on-site during construction to answer your questions. There will be an informational open house on Tuesday, September 18th at 8t. Genevieve Parish Community Center at 4:30 to 7:00 pm. where a representative will be able to answer any questions you may have. In addition, Anoka County publishes a weekly construction update on all county projects. This Construction Weekly is posted on our Internet web site at http://www.co.anoka.mn.us/v1 departments/div":public-services/dept-hiQhwavlindex. asp Again, thank you for your cooperation during the construction of this much-needed highway. If I can be of any assistance, please let me know. Sinc:p, ~ ~~son Project Representative Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer CITY OF CENTERVILLE tervi{{e 'L.;ta6lLo;Jied" Ui5;- MONTHL Y ENGINEER'S REPORT For September 12, 2007 City Council Meeting Italics = New information. Normal = No change from last report. 1. Pheasant Manh 31"11 Addition (000616-03134-0). The only items left to be completed are removal and replacement of the bike path trail to correct the ponding areas. The Contractor also has to place the bituminous wear course. We have requested a schedule to finish the remaining work and will forward the schedule to the City once we receive it from the Contractor. The bituminous wear course will be installed following the completion of the bike path correction work. 2. Bunten Crossing 3n1 Addition (000616-05141-0). The Contractor continues to work on punch list items before scheduling wear course. We have requested a schedule for the wear course paving and will forward to the City as soon as we receive it. 3. 21st AvenuelBackage Road (000616-05143-0). A pay request which includes all final quantities will be on this agenda. We have reduced the retainage to 2%, which leaves us with enough money to haul out the topsoil pile that exists on the North side of Parcel B & C. The contract will remain open until the pile is gone or until October I, 2008, at which time we will have it removed The contractor has agreed to these terms and is confident the material can be hauled out by then Contractors from the Old Mill Road project are currently hauling and placing fill material on Parcel D and will continue for the next couple of weeks. We are working with the county to obtain the remainingfillfrom the CSAH 14 project. 4. 2006 Storm Water Analysis (000616-06146-0). The results of this study have been incorporated into the Feasibility Study for the 2009 Street Improvement Project. 5. Old Mill Road Improvements (000616-06147-0). The Contractor is currently working on the pond area of the project installing storm sewer and draintile. The private utilities are in the process of being relocated along Old Mill Road to accommodate our new infrastructure. The Contractor will be installing the Sanitary Sewer the week of the lOth with water main and services to follow. 6. Fairview Street Improvements (000616-06148-0). Contractor will be paving the bituminous driveway to the Lift Station by the end of week. The Contractor has a few punch list items and Bid items remaining to finish before closing the project out. The work is anticipated to be finished within the next few weeks. 7. Block 7 Redevelopment Grading and Utility Improvements (000616-06152-0). The Contractor will be re-televising a portion of the sanitary sewer line to re-inspect a service connection. The remaining punch list items will be addressed after the completion of the re- televising. 8. Centerville Townoffice Park 2Bd Addition (000616-06152-0). A project walk-thru will be completed within a couple of weeks once the Contractor has things ready for an inspection. 9. Clearwater Creek Estates (Banzai Property) (000616-06154.0). Grading is nearing completion. Seeding and other restoration work will be competed shortly. 10. Hidden Spring Park (000616-07155-0). The Contractor has replaced the damaged plugs along the shoreline, installed the new plantings along the edges of the rain garden and has completed all but a few punch list items. A pay request is on this agenda which includes full payment for all items except the rain garden plantings and the swing bench which has yet to be installed Full retainage is still being held on this request. The rain garden planting establishment period is nearly complete. At the end of this period, an inspection will be completed and replacement of any dead plants will occur at that time at no additional cost to the City. 11. Downtown Overhead Power Relocation (000616-07156-0). Clearwater powerlines is in limbo until Xcel gets it back on their schedule. When CSAH 14 slipped they took advantage of that to schedule other work ahead of this. 12. Comprehensive Plan (000616-07157-0). Updated goals have been presented during a joint meeting of the Planning Commission and City Council at a meeting on August th. Revisions and additions discussed at the meeting have been made and forwarded to the City for distribution to Planning Commission and City Council. The next step is to review the land use map and "alternative" stage. During this stage we will look towards the City's full build out and population projections. A presentation of the draft proposed future land use map will be given to the Planning Commission and City Council on October 2nd 2007. 13. 2009 Street and Utility Improvements (000616-07158-0). The Feasibility Report will be presented to the council at a workshop after this council meeting. A public open house for the project has been scheduled for October lh. 14. CSAH 14 Construction Services (000616-07159-0). A preconstruction meeting is scheduled for Monday, September 10, at 10:00 at the Anoka County Highway Department offices. We will be in attendance along with City Staff. 15. New Public Works Facility (000616-07160-0). We have reviewed the site plan and submitted our comments to the City. The City should decide if there are any of these comments which they would like addressed by the Owner's engineer before the site is finished. Weare assisting Mr. Larson with wetland issues on the site and will formulate some recommendations for proceeding with any associated work. 16. Downtown Redevelopment Comprehensive Infrastructure Plan (000616-07161-0). We met with staff to review the preliminary drawings of sewer, water, storm sewer, streetscaping and trails. Revisions to those drawings are being made based on staff comments. A meeting has been set up with the Rice Creek Watershed District to discuss storm water treatment options. 17. Downtown Redevelopment Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W) (000616-07162- 0). The EA W is being submitted to the City Council for review and approval at the September 12, 2007 City Council meeting. 18. Miscellaneous . We are working with the Public Works department to shape a pond and ditch maintenance policy/plan and annual budget. -Eruiqfmemo- tervi[[e 'EstaElishea 1857 Feasibility Study 2009 Street and Utility Improvement Project City of Centerville November 2007 Project Number: 000616-07158-0 .. Bonestroo 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 v.'WV.'. bonestroo.com November 8, 2007 # Bonestroo Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038-9794 Re: 2009 Street and Utility Improvements City of Centerville Bonestroo File No.: 000616-071 58-0 Dear Mayor and Council: We are pleased to present the Feasibility Report for the 2009 Street and Utility Improvements Project. This project was first contemplated by the 2003 Pavement Management Study. The report updates the findings of that study and examines in greater detail the proposed improvements and estimated costs. The report finds that the improvements are necessary, cost effective and feasible. This report is required under Minnesota Chapter 429 if the project is to be specially assessed in any amount. Sincerely, BONESTROO Mark Statz, PE City Engineer 651-604-4709 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mark Statz, PE Date: November 8. 2007 Reg. No. 42717 CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 2009 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Table of Contents Letter of Transmittal.,.........,......."." .......................... ,......., .....,...............................,...., .............,... ........... 1 Table of Contents.................,......... .......................... ....... .............,......... ...... ..............,...,................... .......2 Introduction..... ................... ........ ................".......... ....... ........................ .................' ,...... ........,.....,...... ..... 3 Street Improvements........................ .............. ........ ............. ....... ....... .......,.......,...............,...... ............."...3 Exisiting Conditions ........... ............ .................. ......., ..... .............. ........... ..... ..... .................. ..... .............................. 4 Proposed Improvements.......,............, .........,..............,......... .............,........... .......... ........................................,....,6 "Possible Alternative.............,.......................... ................. .......................,... ........................"......, .......... .............7 Storm Sewer. ................................. ........,....,....,... .......... ...... ........,............................. ............................. 11 Proposed Pipe Installations...,............. ............... ............ ...................................,............,....,., ....................,........ 11 Storm Sewer Crossing Issues.........,.... ......,...................... ................................,.,...,............................................. 11 Proposed Storm Water Management.....................,.......................................... ,........... ........... ,...........................11 Sanitary Sewer.,...............,...............,.....,......,.,.. ........,.,..., ...........,....,..............."....,............................... 12 Replacing and Repairing Pipe,............. ........"........................ ..... .......................,'.....,......,..,." ..............,.............. 12 Manhole Rehabilitation....................,............,.....,............... ...................... ......,........,.,..................................,..... 12 Water Main..... ..........................................."........... ............... ........................,.. .............,.....,.................. 13 Water main extensions......,.... ............ ,....................... ...........,......,...........",..........,.........,..'..,....,.........,.....,....... 13 Water service Stub installation,.......,........,...,......,.........,..."............."..,...,...."..".,...,................,.....,..............,..,. 13 Water service connection to home.... .......... ,... .............. .......... ..... ......... ................." ..... ................. ...... ............. 13 Bolt Replacement..............,......,.....,.....,...,..................................,................... .....................,...".... '......,............ 14 Sidewalk Improvements........................,...........,...... ....... ..... ............. ...... .........,.... ............ ....,.................. 14 Lift Station #3 .. ........'......,............... .....,......,... ..... "........ ......... ...".. .......... ................,... ..........,.,..."......... 22 Existing Conditions....,..,.......,..,.......,.....,.............,..... ..................,..........,.........,......,.....,.."............,....,...,.,....... 22 Proposed Improvements"....,....................,..........,................,....,....,.,....,.......".,.,.,.....,......",....,..,..,............,....,.. 22 Operation and Maintenance Costs .... ..,.. ......... ............................ . '''' .................,............ ........" ..................... 22 Recommended Solution.... ........ ....................,.....,........', ................,................................ ..... ,........,........,......."...23 Cost Estimates. ..........,..."............................ "....,..... ..................."............. ............ ................,...,........,... 25 Assessments.... ........ ......,......,..,. ...............,....., ..........."...........,..,................................... .....,........,.........25 Assessments will be calculated by City Staff and will be based on policy set by the City Council. Project Schedule."......."........ .......,.......................,....",...".,.,.... ......."...,.......",..".....,......,...........,.,......,.25 Project Schedule,........,.....,........, "..............".. .......... ..........' ........ "....... ........".........,... ",.....,....,...,..,....... 26 Conclusions and Recommendations,.,.".,......., ........."..,..".'....,..'.....,.".......".,...,......,...,... ,.....,.,..".,.....,.. 26 Appendix....,..., .........,...,.,...,..'",.".",....",.....",.",.,.........,...,...,.,.",.,..",.....,'............"".......,'.,.........,.,.... 28 CITY OF CENTERVILLE - 200g STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Introduction The City of Centerville has chosen to investigate the feasibility of performing improvements to rehabilitate existing streets and to install new water mains as suggested in the 2003 Pavement Management Study. This report is extremely important as the endeavor is wide reaching and costly, affeding more than 470 homes with an estimated cost of $ 7.2 million. The study, which evaluated the condition of all streets in town, set a recommended schedule of improvements including, seal coats, overlays, and reconstructions, Also considered in the study, were streets which were not yet serviced with City water main. Street improvement projects were proposed to coincide with those utility installations. The study proposed two seal coat projects, one in 2004 and the other scheduled for 2006. In 2004, the city seal coated most of the streets recommended for said improvements in that year. The streets scheduled for seal coating in 2006 have not yet been completed. The study also laid out two street improvement projects, one scheduled for 2004, and the other for 2009. In 2004, the city completed the scheduled street and utility improvement project. The project covered most streets designated for that year by the study. The second of these projects is still scheduled to be completed in 2009. In order to ensure recommendations of the 2003 study are still appropriate four years later, it has been determined that all streets not reconstructed as part of the 2004 projed and those designated for 2009 reconstruction be reevaluated at this time. This study addresses those streets and their proposed rehabilitation. Street Improvements The specific streets to be included within this study are listed below in Table 1 with their respective lengths. The project affects nearly six miles of city streets. Street Name From To LF Mound Trail* City Border 1200' NE 1200 Mound Trail* 1200' NE of City Border CSAH 14 2250 Cardinal Drive 20th Avenue N W Robin Lane 525 Center Street Dupre Road 20th Avenue 2000 Clearwater Drive Peltier Lake Dr CDS (S) 400 Ivy Court Center Street CDS (N) 420 Robin Lane N W Robin Lane 20th Avenue N 525 Robin Lane S 20th Avenue N W Robin Lane 525 Robin Lane W N Robin Lane S Robin Lane 500 TABLE 1 - PROPOSED snEETS City of CenterviIle 2009 Street and Utility Improvement Project -#' Bonestroo Project No: 616-07-]580 Page 3 Peltier Lake Drive Peltier Circle Peltier Circle 600 Peltier La ke Drive CSAH 14 Dead End (E) 2500 Sumac Court Center Street CDS (S) 420 Mill Road Prairie Drive Dead End (N) 915 Mill Road Main Street Prairie Drive 1720 72nd 1/2 Street Unity Avenue Twin Lake Avenue 360 73 rd Street Brian Drive 20th Avenue 1050 Brian Way 275' East of Brian Drive CDS (S) 560 140' North of lakeland Centerville Road Cir Peltier lake Drive 575 Fox Run Peterson Trail CDS 525 Grainqeview 40' North of CDS CDS (S) 150 Hayfield Road Peterson Trail Mill Road 740 Houle Circle Peterson Trail CDS 660 Peltier Circle - West Peltier lake Drive Centerville Road leg 380 Peltier lake Drive Peltier Circle - East Leg Mill Road 370 Peterson Trail CSAH 14 Fox Run 1300 Prairie Drive Mill Road CDS (E) 1300 Unity Avenue 72nd and 1/2 Street CDS (S) 425 72nd Street Unity Avenue Brian Drive 1050 Brian Drive 72nd Street 300' North of 73rd St 1330 Twin lakes Avenue 73rd Street 72 nd 1/2 Street 670 Brian Drive CSAH 14 72nd Street 1410 275' East of Brian Brian Way Brian Drive Drive 275 Clear Ridge Mill Road CDS (W) 1260 Fox Run Brian Drive Peterson Trail 720 Graingeview Clear Ridge 40' North of CDS 180 Unity Avenue 72nd and 1/2 Street CDS (N) 275 Total 30,065 . DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY STREET WORK. ONLY UTILITY WORK. CONFINED TO THE BOULEVARD IS PROPOSED. The streets analyzed in this feasibility study have been separated into five sections to better illustrate the detail of the proposed improvements. A map with these sections highlighted is shown in Figure 1. EXISITING CONDITIONS The streets being analyzed in this study are at various points in their lifecycle and are in need of varying degrees of improvement based on a lifecycle cost analysis. Many factors play into the condition of the streets including the following: . Surface and Subsurface Drainage · Street Section (exist. thickness of bituminous and gravel) . Subgrade soils . Amount and Type ofTraffic . Age of Pavement . Maintenance throughout the Lifespan City of Centerville 2009 Street and Utility Improvement Project .t; Bonestroo ProjectNo 616-07-1580 Page 4 r / J LOCATION PLAN ~ (;._ I / \ .~~ nt- .-" ~ / .' (..'~ I ---J~~ './1 @ F:I It- JI1Ij- 1- I I I 7 '-' ........J 1-= I I I ~ t-- r [jl. r- f--'-- I - (\\ --l I ~:~. ~ ~ /' li ~- L-::: ~ ~ - ~~ Cl'-...~ I I ,\\'1 III/.....\"'C~I n_ I \E~=f-f--j~ I 0, ~~~i';;: I J.7 ~~ ~::r-= ~ "0J ~\Z'IIII~~:~'~ =::ili~i,r,n llY= '* I ~ \~\\~= .\c~. ~=/7Tnj'.~ ~ ~@'. .~ '- i D:c rn::m ~. ~ ..~\ \ \ '\}--. I ~J A- f- tffiE ~~~I \ II /11 ~~ T H ~l= '--I- f--- I I 'CO ...J . . \1 f--~~ ~t= =t= f- ~- R15Itd [] ~j f-- ~ ~ ~~ =9-< I m~~~ l..~~I:s II .11 11 .. ~ ~~ tUJ r=r &EffiffiEEEIIJ ~/j!!!j})j{jrE =s ~ f-I gLk:1TIf m~~~~ ./ / L ~~~ Fcnn\ 10~::SIT 1)'/1 IL. I / ~ ~ ~ 181J3 ~ g l /=r[-~ Lf: I1II I 1]1 l.-~\2 !-:; ~1lJ ~ C IJ 5\ \ !- =u r=L- ttJj ~ I J B~ <I s:v1~ ~ BI t:Y+ III Il~.~ '" I \ I ~~ I~!I~ _r I ^~~ . . ~>--- ~ \ n ~[ ,....--- r- r L nTlTJA Ti2:!td ~ N o 1000 I Scale in feet 2000 I .- Bonestroo CITY OF CENTERVILLE 2009 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 616071158FOO1.DWG DATE: 8/8/07 COMM: 616-07-158 FIGURE 1 In June and July of 2007, Bonestroo, along with City Staff, did a thorough inspeaion of all streets identified for the study and their existing conditions. Since ratings based on the PASER (PAvement Surface Evaluation and Rating) System were established in 2003, this inspeaion focused on updating those findings and identifying new deficiencies of individual streets and utility needs. Based on these observations, the proposed streets were categorized based on the recommended levels of repairs needed. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The improvements were proposed based on the existing conditions observed in the walking inspeaion. The improvements can be divided into five primary categories: A. WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS: The area shown as "Section 1" in Figure 1 includes the extension of water main to the end of Mound Trail. This work would be confined to the north boulevard and should not affea the roadway. Services would be direaionally drilled under the roadway to avoid pavement impaas. No road improvements are proposed for this area. The homes in this area are not hooked to City water. Water main was extended past some of the homes in 2005, but the residents were not forced to hook to the new main, nor were services from the new main extended to the property line. It is the recommendation of this report to install service lines with a curb stop at the property line for all homes which are not yet connected to City water. This would include homes in the area where water main was previously extended as well as homes in the area where new water main is proposed. Services will be installed via directional drilling technology to avoid impacts to the roadway. Category A improvements are divided into two types as listed below: A-l - Extension of new water main and services with no associated road work. A-2 - Water main already exists, but new services are proposed, with no associated road work. B. FULL RECONSTRUCTION: Several areas throughout town do not currently have City water main, but do have fully developed streets with City Sewer. The addition of water main to these areas will necessitate the full reconstruction of the streets due to the urban topography, the width of the existing right-of-way and the condition of the existing streets. Where curb exists, this will mean full removal and replacement of the curb and gutter along with the street section. Other areas do not have curb and gutter. Some of those streets will be reconstructed to an urban section (curb and gutter); others may be leh as a rural section. Many options were considered when evaluating the proposed improvements for these sections. Saving the existing curb was contemplated but proved to be impractical and not cost effective due to the number of service crossings and the winding nature of the roadway. For the same reasons, saving portions of the pavement also proved to be counterproductive. Because these improvements will remove and replace curb and gutter and will extend water services to the property line, a significant amount of front-yard disturbance will be involved. Boulevards will be restored City of Centerville 2009 Street and Utility Improvement Project ~ Bonestroo Project No: 616-07-]580 Page 6 with sod and driveways will be replaced in-kind, The amount of sod and driveway replaced on each lot will depend on service locations and any changes in street grade which may be part of the final design to better fit the existing topography, Category 8 improvements are divided into three types as listed below: B-1 - Extension of new water main and services. Full street reconstruction including all new curb. B-2* - Extension of new water main and services. Full street reconstruction. Road to be left as rural section. 8-3* - Water main already exists, but new services are proposed. Full street reconstruction. Road to be left as rural section. *POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE The reconstruction of Mill Road allows for alternatives in redesign. In this report it is proposed that Mill Road, north and south of Prairie Drive, be reconstructed following a 82 and 83 format respectively. 80th category 82 and 83 improvements mean the street will be reconstructed to a rural section. If the city so desires, it is possible to reconstruct Mill Road to match the urban typical section used throughout the remainder of the city. The following table conveys the costs associated with choosing to rebuild Mill Road with an urban typical section. TABLE 2 - COMPARISON OF PROPOSED AND ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION OF MILL ROAD . Proposed" " Alternative" Additional Cost of Rural Section Urban Section Urban Section Construction Cost $522,976.98 $808,337.81 $285,360.82 Contingencies 5% $26,148.85 $40,41689 $14,268.04 Engineering 30% $156,893.10 $242,501.34 $85,608.25 Total Cost $755,500.00 $1,091,300.00 $335,800.00 Cost Per ClL Foot 2635 $290.00 $415.00 $125.00 The increase in the cost of construction of an urban section can be attributed to the following factors: . Increased excavation o The road would need to be lowered approximately 3 to 4 feet for proper drainage. . Need for additional storm sewer o Storm Sewer would be needed to replace the existing ditch and culvert system. . Increased restoration of residential properties o Ditches would need to be filled and yards regraded and restored with sod, . Concrete curb and gutter cost . Additional Watershed requirements o The watershed prefers the ditch system and would have few requirements if left as is. With the addition of curb, gutter and storm sewer, ponding and infiltration features would be required, City of Centerville 2009 Street and Utility Improvement Project -#- Bonestroo Project No: 616-07-1580 Page 7 Either of the above stated options are feasible for the reconstruction of Mill Road, It is recommended that Mill Road be constructed as proposed to reduce cost and minimize disruption to the residents, If it is determined that the need for uniformity negates these factors, then the alternative of an urban section should be constructed, C FULL DEPTH STREET RECONSTRUCTION: In the northeast portion of the City, many streets are already fully serviced by City water. These areas are simply in need of street rehabilitation, For category C, the streets have deteriorated to a point where it is not economically viable, from a life cycle cost perspective, to do minor improvements to the surfacing, A complete reconstruction of the substrate is needed to ensure the investment made in the street is of lasting value, For the most part, curb and gutter in these segments is in good condition and will require only spot repairs, This means that that little or no disturbance behind the curb will take place, keeping costs at a minimum, A full street section will be placed between the curbs including fabric, draintile, sand, gravel and bituminous, Part of the reason for the deterioration of these streets is often a lack of proper surface drainage, Therefore, the proposed improvements include additional catch basins and storm sewer where it is both needed and reasonably feasible, Category C improvements are as described below: C - Full reconstruction of the existing street section. Curb and gutter will be left in place except for spot repairs. The new section will consist of draintile, fabric, sand, gravel and bituminous. Storm sewer improvements will also be constructed where applicable. D, FULL BITUMINOUS REMOVE AND REPLACE: Other streets in the northeast portion of the City which do not require water main installation are in slightly better condition than those identified in Category C These roads have some value left in the subbase material and can be rehabilitated more economically by simply removing and replacing the existing bituminous, The existing gravel section could be left in place along with the curb and gutter, Spot repairs to the curb and gutter as well as to the gravel base could be made as necessary, Draintile could be trenched in along the front edge of each of the curb lines to help maintain the integrity of the subbase, For the most part, curb and gutter in these segments is in good condition and will require only spot repairs, This means that that little or no disturbance behind the curb will take place, keeping costs at a minimum, Part of the reason for the deterioration of these streets is often a lack of proper surface drainage. Therefore, the proposed improvements include additional catch basins and storm sewer where it is both needed and reasonably feasible, Category D improvements are as described below: City of Centerville 2009 Street and Utility Improvement Project -# Bonestroo Project No: 6 J 6-07-1580 Page 8 D - Full removal and replacement of the existing bituminous section. Curb and gutter will be left in place except for spot repairs. The new section will consist of draintile, the existing gravel base and new bituminous. Storm sewer improvements will also be constructed where applicable. E. EDGE MILL AND OVERLAY: Finally, some streets in the northeast are in a position to be rehabilitated by a minimally invasive improvement known as an edge mill and overlay. This work will significantly extend the life of the street with minimal cost. The edges along the front of each curb line are milled (ground) off to a depth of about 1 V2 inches, leaving some of the bituminous section in tact. This is done only on the edges, with the middle of the street remaining untouched. Then a bituminous overlay is paved over the entire roadway, adding to the strength of the existing street. Category E improvements are as described below: E - Mill the edge of the bituminous along each cub line for a width of 6 feet. Curb and gutter will be left in place except for spot repairs. The new section will consist of the existing gravel and bituminous and a lift new bituminous. Storm sewer improvements will also be constructed where applicable. The proposed roadways with their respective proposed improvements can be seen illustrated in Figure 2 and can also be seen in a tabular format later in the report. City of Centerville 2009 Street and Utility Improvement Projen #' Bonestroo Project No 616-07-]580 Page 9 '115' 1/ I - - [l] c::J - c:::J - - - - r~ .... , 'F. ~ F;$<P' ~: --1<fJ---- ~ \, .. IAr ~_'--IJl1IL~U jiY\: I ~~~ l~vV 0; / / \1 \/v ~\ L---JL---Y J{~ "A'\12\'\Y it iJ. /<\ ~ ~~'411. V ~ N ~ VII.I. 1E~ CEN i< E I. ,. ~AI .c~/ ~: Ji>\Xi --' : = ~ ----<lIE ; . --t/i Y / 'r~) jM-Tl ...I . - ~(F= _ I /~ ~ I I I f7'f' ~ t- ~=mm.m~: I..m ~ 7':~ ..,- - c ~ ~ ;" ~. 1] t Jr_ =,i - IJJ- ----'" - \I~ ~.j /; .JI--- rJ I- ~' ~ - - -j...1 . '''~ . ~... ~.. I\''''' ~ I -fu I----jr-F f l_ -- = I I I ~ \~. \= 1_ \~. U- ~/ j II _ '--- - "- '" r'iTPi~ t/):;. \'~ :::::: ~ ~ c-:L11] , .-- ~:= = f:I=ffi i ~ '<i~ ". ~ I I I H f-- ~.I ~ m \ . I ( I e- I ~ >- -'. '.'.J ;15ldIDI~jj i ~ Ii ~ r =~: ~~ ~ ~ ~ It rr~ ~ ~,_ I ~ ,I 111 -- == liD I V aE8HB69tnJ~/\ .. ^ - #'H~. I ~ II I ~~'~ h.'-_ - r;r I f~ _rrfTITill lTp' '- ~ -~. >~ ~ni \y~ ~l-- ~ . ~ j -L ~'C' ~<S>-\- f-- J I/;}/ I \ I VL ~ ~ ~ 8~Q,.__\-lm '; / L I I . S(D1D "'<ltEi5J ~ ;: ~ I ,- ~,,,-;~ . i-'~I~' ~/. ~rc~. r Li' II I 1._. _. I I I = #a' \ 1. 17 ~ r ~l '~W-JH \ I Ilf I!- 17 I V t , L"\ L I ..rI~ II S.J..AF'\ v : = J- ~~ W1J~\ trrL ---- .LlJ1 10 J=Q .~ =~~~ ~~-TTf\CI~I~m[)to TIE ~ pEt. \,..-,/ ~ j \Jo~ !/;~~~~~T" ( o 700 I Scale in feet 1400 I 'I r .1 T1 \ l PROPOSED CONCRElE SIDEWALK EXISTING BllUMINOUS TRAIL EXlSllNG CONCRElE SIDEWALK NUMBER OF NEW WA lER SERVICES PROPOSED PARCEL NOT CURRENll Y SERVED WllH CTY WAlER A1- WATER MAIN EXTENSION A2- SERVICE INSTALLATION ONLY B1- FULL RECON WllH Wt.4. SERVICES &: NEW CURB B2- FULL RECON WllH Wt.4. SERVICES &: NO NEW CURB B3- FULL RECON WllH SERVICES &: NO NEW CURB C- FULL DEPlH STREET RECON WllH NO NEW CURB D- FULL BllUMINOUS R&:R WITH DRAIN TILE &: NO NEW CURB E- EDGE MILL" OVERLAY PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I - o ~...... ..... -" - -- - -- is i! I I \ D.\ -- FIGURE 2 .- Bonestroo CITY OF CENTERVILLE 2009 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 616071158F002.DWG DATE:8/8j07 COMM: 616-07-158 Storm Sewer The existing storm sewer system has been reviewed by City and Bonestroo staff. Please refer to Figures 3-7 for a graphic depiction of the layout of the existing system and the proposed improvements. PROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATIONS There are a number of places where it has been determined that additional pipe and storm sewer structures are needed, These improvements will help surface drainage which will in-turn add to the durability of the street surface. Subsurface drainage improvements are also proposed with th€ use of draintile either in front of the curb, if it is being salvaged or behind the curb in areas of full street reconstrudion. STORM SEWER CROSSING ISSUES The City of Centerville has been experiencing some serious problems due to heaving of fat clays and other moisture laden subgrade soils around existing storm sewer crossings. This annual heaving and settling from freeze-thaw cycles produces uneven roadways and often leads to deteriorated pavements, It is recommended that all storm sewer crossings be excavated and restored with suitable material in order to reduce movement of the future roadway. Figure 8 illustrates the cross sedion of these proposed improvements. PROPOSED STORM WATER MANAGEMENT The proposed project area lies within the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). Therefore, the District will have permit authority over the projed and the storm water management within the project. In order to meet the infiltration requirements of the District, it will be necessary to install infiltration basins (rain gardens), swales or other Best Management Practices (BMPs) throughout the reconstrudion project areas. While the RCWD rules require these BMPs to be installed when street reconstruction projects are undertaken, the district understands the inherent difficulty of retrofitting a fully developed neighborhood with space consuming and grade-dependent facilities, In an effort to fully understand the watershed's requirements and to give them first hand knowledge of the projed and its challenges, Bonestroo staff, along with City staff met, on-site with watershed staff and consultants to walk the project streets. While the watershed would not offer official stances on specific project issues, they did provide helpful direction and guidance on where the letter of the rule would be enforced and where we would be able to demonstrate that there are not viable solutions available, Some neighborhoods such as the Royal Meadows development along 20th Ave. simply did not have adequate space to accommodate retrofitted rain gardens or the like. Other more spacious neighborhoods were, in the opinion of the watershed, more apt to allow the construction of these BMPs. In the attached Appendix A, potential BMP sites are identified (Figures 1.1-1.4), It is important to note that these locations were chosen based on topography and guidance from the watershed during our on-site meetings, Final locations will need to be adjusted as more information is collected. While some BMPs will be able to be constructed within the existing right-of-way and adjacent easements, others will require additional easements, The council should consider whether or not to compensate City of Centerville 2009 Street and Utiljty Improvement Project # Bonestroo Project No: 616-07-1580 Page II homeowners for these easements. Many projects in other communities have successfully obtained easements without compensating homeowners by asking for volunteers. Homeowners who wish to have a raingarden installed in their boulevard have come forvvard in great enough numbers to adequately serve the project area. This kind of cooperation can be fostered by holding informational meetings and by distributing pamphlets and other materials outlining the attributes of these amenities. A cross section of the proposed infiltration basins is shown in Figure 9. Sanitary Sewer Since the City has chosen to make an investment in its streets, it is important that everything underneath those streets be checked to ensure the street investment is not compromised by the future need to repair infrastructure below. The existing conditions of the sanitary sewer system were evaluated through the examination of the City's regularly scheduled sewer televising program. The reports produced from these video inspections were analyzed for deficiencies including mineral deposits, open or offset joints, sagged, cracked, or fractured pipe, Recommendations for the rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer system are included below. Repairs are proposed based on the severity of the problem and the need for that problem to be fixed via open-cut methods. Issues which could be repaired with in-line technology have not been included since their repair can be completed at any time, without disturbing the pavement. REPLACING AND REPAIRING PIPE Throughout this proposed project area numerous sags in the pipeline have been identified. The most severe of these sags hold four inches or more of water. It is recommended that these more severe sags be removed and replaced while the roadway is under construction. The only way to fix sags in the pipe is by excavating them and relaying the pipe. Other, smaller sags have been identified throughout the project area, These hold less than four inches of water and are noted on the following figures. These smaller sags are not recommended to be removed and replaced at this time, With regular maintenance, pipe with small sags can still function although with some capacity compromised. MANHOLE REHABILITATION A few manholes requiring attention were noted in the analysis of the televised tapes. A few of the common issues requiring rehabilitation are: . Waste concrete blocking flow, . Un-grouted connections that allow infiltration, and . Manholes holding water. it is recommended that these manholes be repaired to meet current city standards. City of Centerl'ille 2009 Street and Utility Impr0vrrnent Project # Bonestroo Project No: 616-07-1580 Page ] 2 The following Figures (3 through 7) depict the proposed sanitary sewer rehabilitation recommended to be completed as part of the street maintenance. It is recommended that the remainder of all necessary sanitary sewer repairs, noted in black on the figures, be completed as part of the City's annual sanitary sewer maintenance. This process will allow the City to receive a more competitive bid on the work. Water Main The needs in terms of water main were also discussed with the City staff. Several types of improvements were identified which can also be seen in Figures 3 through 7. WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS As described above under the proposed improvements labeled as A-l, B-1, and B-2, several streets in town are fully developed with City sewer and streets, but do not have City water mains. Mains are proposed for installation on these streets in conjunction with their street improvements, WATER SERVICE STUB INSTALLATION Some areas have City water main adjacent to their property, but have homes which are not yet connected to that main, nor is there a service stub extended to their property line. The City has developed a policy of requiring all properties within the city limits and adjacent to City water mains to be hooked to the system by no later than 2012. To facilitate this, it is recommended, that at a minimum, the City extend services to the edge of the right-of-way/property line for all homes which either currently have water main in their roadway or are proposed to have water main installed with this project. WATER SERVICE CONNECTION TO HOME Requiring homeowners to hook to the City's water system in conjunction with the proposed street improvements would be prudent as this would confine the mess of construction to one year would ease enforcement of the hook up policy in 2012, Additionally, each home is estimated to contribute approximately $250 per year to the water fund through user fees. With approximately 185 new services to be provided with this project, that means an annual income of roughly $45,000, If the City chooses to make immediate hook-up mandatory for all homes served by the proposed project, it will face two options to meet this end, Option one is to have the city project include only the curb stop and service stub to the property line. This leaves each individual homeowner the responsibility of hiring a private plumber to hook their home's water system to the service stub, The upside to this option is it relieves the City of the difficult task of obtaining right-of-entry forms from each homeowner and the inherent liability of coordinating the work of internal plumbing and laying pipe on private property. The downside is that homeowners will feel like they are getting hit twice: once for the assessment and then with a plumber's bill of several thousand more. City of Centerville 2009 Street and Utility Improvement Project 4' Bonestroo Project No: 6 J 6-07-] 580 Page 13 Option two is to incorporate the work of hooking the water service to each home's water system into the City contract. As mentioned above, this would require waivers from each homeowner. On the upside, the homeowners can include this work on their assessment (which is often tax deductible) and finance it over several years. It also gets everyone hooked up in one fail swoop. Construction is done and over with in one season and the neighborhood would be back to normal by the spring. The homes in these areas are serviced by individual wells. Theses wells should be abandoned. The city may elect to have this abandonment be part of the project or to leave this responsibility to the homeowner in the same manner as stated above. . Lots not yet connected to the City's water system can be seen highlighted in yellow in Figure 2. BOLT REPLACEMENT In the late nineties, the City began requiring all water main fittings to be installed with corrosion resistant bolts. These fittings include valves, bends, tees, and hydrants among others. This policy was invoked due to several bolt failures which appeared to be caused by corroded bolts. These bolts were likely compromised by cathodic conditions in the City's predominately clayey soils. Water main installed before the corrosion resistant bolts were specified exists below streets proposed to be rehabilitated with this project, If the city wishes to take a proactive approach to dealing with this issue, they could choose to replace all bolts on existing fittings which fall under streets proposed for rehabilitation. Sidewalk Improvements Several streets proposed for rehabilitation have existing sidewalks, while others do not. The City has recently contracted for repairs to the existing sidewalks throughout town, Therefore, sidewalk maintenance will not be a part of this contract. Of the streets which do not have sidewalks, some do not necessarily need them, while it makes sense to install them on other streets. Figures 2-7 show the existing and proposed sidewalks. City of Centerville 2009 Street and Utility Improvement !''''Iect .tt Bonestroo Project No: 616-07-1580 Page 14 CJ - I<::::j r - - - Y SERVED WIlli CITY WA 1ER ON liON ONlY 81- FUll RECON \\\I. SERVICES I: NEW CURB 82- FUll RECON lli \\\I. SERVICES I: NO NEW CURB 83- FUll RECON lli SERVICES ole NO NEW CURB C- FUll DEPTH RECON WIlli NO NEW CURB D- FlJlL B1lUMINOU RacR WIlli DRAlNlILE ole NO NEW CU E- EDGE MIll ole 0 Y NEW WA 1ER MAIN STORM SEWER SANlTiARY SEWER SANlTiARY SEWER M - - - o " " \~ I 6'1" -1----L ~~\) ~O A~( vi LJJ NIO~ I -J c( I l - CITY LIMITS UTILITIES - SECTION 1 o 200 400 I I Scale in feet .- Bonestroo FIGURE 3 CITY OF CENTERVILLE 2009 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 61607158FOOO.DWG DATE:8-8-07 COMM: 616-07-158 CJ - \::-:-::-::1 - PARCEL NOT CURRENllY SERVED WITH CITY WATER 1.1- WATER MAIN EX1INSlON 1\2- SERVICE INSTALLATION ONLY 81- FULL RECON WITH W, SERVICES. NEW CURB 82- FULL RECON WITH W, SERVICES . NO NEW CURB B3- FULL RECON WITH SERVICES . NO NEW CURB c- FULL DEPTH S1REET RECON Wl1tl NO NEW CURB D- FULL Bll\JMINOUS RI:R WITH DRAlNTILE . NO NEW CURB E- EDGE MILL. O\'ERI..AY NEW WATER MAIN STORM SEWER CROSSING REPAIR SANITARY SEWER REPAIR SANITARY SEWER MH MAINTENANCE i-- - - - - - 10- RCP 4+" WATER 0+05->0+38' FROM W 1+00->1+12' FROM W o 0+85->1+02' FROM W 1+28->1+48' FROM W 1+89->1+78' FROM W , ". OPEN JOINT 3+38 FROM W WASlE CONCRElE AT CONNECllON (;) ~ cS ~ ~~ ~ ~ /' '" o 200 400 I UTILITIES - SECTION 2 I Scale in feet .- Bonestroo CITY OF CENTERVILLE 2009 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FIGURE 4 61607158FOOO.DWG DATE:8-8-07 COMM: 616-07-158 c::J - f::::.::\ - - PARCEL NOT CURREN1lY SERVED Wl1M aTY WAlER A1- WAlER MAIN EXlENSlON A2- SERVICE INSTAl.LAllON ONLY 81- FULL RECON WllH VoW, SERVICES 6: NEW CURB 82- FULL RECON WllH VoW, SERVICES 6: NO NEW CUR8 83- FULL RECON WllH SERVICES 6: NO NEW CURB C- FULL DEP1H S1REET RECON WllH NO NEW CURB D- FULL B1lUMINOUS RacR WllH DRAlNllLE 6: NO NEW CURB E- EDGE Wu. 6: OVERLAY NEW WA lER MAIN STORM SEWER CROSSING REPAIR SANITARY SEWER REPAIR SANITARY SEWER MH MAlNlENANCE ...... \ R~VOlh STR ET - - - - - - o "" \ " , 1 1~~S '"- ~ /~;'/ ~ \ iU II / ~ e] "i+~-~Ht- ,,-__ __ _____...7: ~ v-- r- T ~ ~J ..." - - 1\- - \ \ 1G::f 2+~ FROM!- F"- Z' W, IBK ~ . ~ _ \:tOO- >1+20' fRQM,E' ,/ . , 'I"'" 1783 n I I -'-' ~/ ." ~ .~ L.... j" / ~I\. 1782 1784 I I.i' '- 216.- OPEN. ""NT , 3+84 FROM 15' ,I ~ . N l " [ ~ 1 - ~ c o ~ ,~ ,'i~ r\-'WAlER 0+25->0+'" IlRON E " ;l+6\:->2.. /l2\ FtlOW E ~ ,...._,' I' " \ \ ,',...' I \ \ ' ... ... J , ... ... ~, //' " ... .,.... ... ?I :> 1'2.0.J.~~ Ii) -"- is''JI'' " ..,J ~ ~ !1i " ~ "f\; ) ~ N ~ PVC o..~ ;:J 1+02-;>- :DftlI N " fD fD N " CO III N " I II '3; N " j 1 ; ~ N I " i 1 ... fD N " v- /1 ... III N " 0" ~ r?' I 1817 1823 1829 1835 1841 1813 N N N "~TI="\/I=""I I A ~ P N " l' -g~ :: :~::' - .,~ . , ~ r['.' " ' N 1818 11824 gs28 \ 1832' 1844 ~ i PRA RIE N I") " N 1 " I \ I :q ..t- K ) ----if N N " UTILITIES - SECTION 3 ~ 72RD ( TRE T 1846 2 o U1 ~ 1== W (L 1847 1862 = <( a::: ~ 863 ~ --I- --'--.- 1869 1873 I J ^ 1''1"''0 C '" CREEK PARK -- 1en "118/ ~ / ~ ~ 18> J '< , ~ lE CON/ZRllE Y 1858 1862 1868 DR VE .". I~ r-~ I ~Ar.r:lRI ~ r- ~ l\ ) - w & L . ~ I . I ."- I ~,Jx llf-Y 1 c g <l 57 ~I /"{";r ~ " "") ~~ ,-- _.- ~ 0+40 FROM ~' I-- - - OPEN JOIN , i+18 FR<II E 193~ I~>- ~ ~ 1938 ~o ,~ I 1941 1949 ~ N ~J . --.,.. ~ V ,2ND 1946 2- WA 0+98- +08'... flU P ... 1- WAlEJ ~ 0+88->4: ft.78' FROIt S CD N " o CD N " ..t- III N " ~1'},~t ~~.., 0 CD . CD N N " " :8 N " OW ~::> "2 ~> ~<( / 73RD 1957 S REEl 1967 1975 QU BEe STRE::T I-t---- ~~::7~" ~~ - / ~~ :~ ~ 1 T\\,,,,Q \--1 \~ Vj -~ I I I I 0) N N " .... N f'I ~ CS'.,..) 10 III N ,... ~ " o I") N " o N ^' 1968 1976 i> C" r .... CD N " N l"'- N " :;~ ~<( CO(/) ~w ,,~ N..:J III N "2 ~3: N~ " 1969 1975 In N " III III N " ... III N " 1962 1968 1976 2ND 1/2 ST. tE T / HOLDI~ ~ WAlER $:TR ~^~ 1n"?1 10"7"7 o 200 400 I I Scale in feet FIGURE 5 CITY OF CENTERVILLE 2009 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 61607158FOOO.DVVG DATE:8-8-07 COMM: 616-07-158 1983 1995 1984 1994 I ~ N " .. r~ I") N ", coI- N_ ~~ N N "" .- Bonestroo ..... I ~ ~ ~ ~ , I ~ ' - IV ~ r.~ ~\~ ~ /~I~~ ~ . ~ "\ N j' 'c , 1844 ,,0; 1962 1968 1976 N ;J ~ ...... 1858 1862 1868 ~ ~ "t! ...... :, 1818 11824 1828 \ 1832 - 2ND 1/2 ST. - ~ . ~ PVC ~.:::.J v DR VE 18>< ~ ~ ~~ . ~ PRARIE N '~ :1E ~( N ~ 04~ N / ...... 1/,,- .......... ;:J 1+02-~ 'ROM N ...... AT N 0) 0 - 1'--_ T "- I It) N .., CDI- ., I ,., /-~ N N N_ - ~ - v ,&'0 .L" ~ ...... ...... r NZ N .". --- ......- N - N I~ WA 1ER N N .., ...... N 0 STRE EJ{ N- -2::. ! I ~ STEVEN N - 7 2ND It) N N N A. ...... -...J~ McBR! E ...... N ~931 1955 19 3 1971 1977 N , It) I ' ""- ~ ylAL ...... 1937 1943 1949 ...... - co - _..L I~ N " - '" "- ~ ~ P K 10 ...... -------- N cb' .... ~!:J - N 0;- I ...... N 1776 1784 " :,' .... ~ ('883 [9 ...... 1968 1974 ...... 0 () ...a "- 1920 1926 1934 1940 1946 1950 Ir56 1962 N ,.,1 N ~ ~ ~ 198 1986 "'~ ...... r . a::: 0) 2" WA IER 2" MA 1ER - COITl N N <( ~ ,., FOX RUN 0 =~ nONS N ~D N N N -1+56- 1+75' ~ E 3+25-)~40' F1 OM W- ~--- ,., 0)> ...... ...... 0- ~ ...... LOOSE 0 ~;o 1823 873 1875 N 10 1P. . :-:,: l' ...... =::r - - --: 0 e /14 1~ ';;...-- --' \~ -?:~ ...... '" ~~1 ~ ~ I ~ 8<8 1832 1844- 1850 I 11858 0862 , Co ~1 N. ROB N L~NE ~ ~ ----- ...... , , N ...... CD 0) 0) PARK 0) - ,,~q:,o 1966 1972 1978 1984 1988 -1 ~ -- - 0) 0) ;:::1 ...... 1994 ~ .-\. --- ...... - - ...... ...... ~ ~ " ~ 0) (j) N ----------1 0) - . v j 0) ~;::: 'd! N CD ~- - - I 1967 1977 1983 1989 ...... I' ...... ...... 1995 '" 12 - \ J ~ --..:;;;- ...... ...... '--'-- .1 W t:> 8" VCf' , V,r ~ 10 co <(CD :::> CD ---I;::: - ~ \ " WA 1ER .., ." ~.- - CD .,c. d) +34->2+86' 'ROMNW "I; CD 2+13->2+ 'fJ' FROM ~ ...... - ~ ...... N ...... >1>8 - ~~ Z- C ~RD' NAL3 bRIV 12 P ~\ ~ HAY IELD ROA )1835 '\847 > 0) 0 _CD io~" WAI U ::? ' ...... 1817 1823 1829 '\84'\ <( ...... CD fQ;::: 52->3+ ' FROM S - - - .-' - I -, .~.-. w...... ...... '-' 1970 1976 1982 1988 1994 < ,... R co 0:::10 3: 7165 ......~, ::::-~ ...... --::::>.., "lit' \..1 \ ...... --- --r:::- - - ...... I\-~ ...... O:::~ ...... - w ...... r 1824 1'\844 ,\8 0 - ...... -- co co 1810 1818 1828 1832 0...... ...... I ~'6j 1967 - > ;::: IR <( I- 0) I 1977 1983 1989 1995 ...... f----' - ~ ...... (f)~ (/) CD - -="w ...... co co w...... .... ,. - - :J ~ ~ I ...... ...... - ;:; I}-~r",~~ ./ ...... V ...... 7164 3.., f- ~ co co - co C 0) r ~;::: - --- -- .., - S ROE biN L V\NE 10 0+72->1+03' FR ...... co 15l ...... C' >1.s-.s- - - t:> ...... ~ 3+50->3+58 FR (f)0) N ...... 1970 1976 1982 1988 1994 I 0 - o '8'3~ O:::~ co ZIO I \ ~OYAL ~ ._ iJIIIIIIJI -- '- .---0 ...... - ~ &j w...... ...... <(~ co q,.... 7> 10 ...... v ;::::;...... - ;:: v .... w- ...... ;:: EADOWS/..O 1971 ,." '9133 1989 '995 10 v ~ CL~ 10 m 0 , ;::: ~ ~ " PARK N~NEmONS ~ - v <( ...... - CIO ...... >- ~ CD _ , - 10 - , T~ ~- 0 \ - ( ...... - ...... I~ ...... ~ ;::: , 0::: ~ CD I 1835 1841 I. .., I iiO v ~ ;;;:0 ~ - - 10 I, ~12" Ra> ISSlNG ...... .., - - f( ;+78 F ~OM N ;::: ...... - 0 PARCEL NOT CURRENTLY SERVED WllH CITY WATER 4>+"' "^.~ ~ 1829 ...... ...... I ~0+1a->O+75' P ~ ~ .., co - A1- WATER MAIN EXTENSION - CD 0) .., ---I _2+80->2+111 OMN Jr ...... .., N - 1<<<-<1 1.2- SERVICE t1STAl.LAllON ONLY ---I ...... li1<i ~~t ~r' c IR~E CD - Z - ...... .., ...... ...... - 81- FULL RECON WITH WM. SERVICES '" NEW CURB - ;;; <( co ::;E ...... N 82- FULL RECON WITH WM, SERVICES '" NO NEW CURB 0 - ~ ~li , .., 0 ...... 0 B3- FULL RECON WITH SERVICES '" NO NEW CURB ,~' - .., ,., CD - ...... ~ - 10 - - C- FULL DEPTH S1REET RECON WITH NO NEW CURB ...... N ...... - - D- FULL BITUMINOUS RotR WITH DRAlN1ILE & NO NEW CURB . . -- -- ...... ,I --- ~ ~ - E- EDGE MILL '" OYERLA Y 0) NEW WA 1ER MAIN - - - t::- '- - ...... . " ...... - sroRM SEWER CROSSING REPNR .... ....~-- -- -- :- -- -- - " 10 0)_ ~IO ...... 0) 10_ - SANITARY SEWER REPAIR -" ~ vII) 10 10 co co...... - N N , I CD CD CD 18 CD CD CD CD CD - - 0 SANITARY SEWER MH MAlNlENANCE ~ - - 1801 1825 - - - - - - - .... ro ro.. ...... ,...... ~ I I II , - l , 0 200 400 I . UTILITIES - SECTION 4 Scale in feet CITY OF CENTERVILLE 2009 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FIGURE 6 .- Bonestroo 61607158FOOO.DWG DATE:8-8-07 COMM: 616-07-158 c::J PARCEL NOT CURRENtlY SER\<ED W1lH QTY WATER _ A1- WATER MAIN EXlENSlON 1>>1 A2- SERVICE INSTALLAlION ONLY IIIIP 81- FULL RECON W1lH W. SERVICES" NEW CURB 82- FULL RECON W1lH W. SERVICES " NO NEW CURB 83- FULL RECON W1lH SERVICES " NO NEW CURB _ C- FULL DEPlH S1REET RECON W1lH NO NEW CURB _ D- FULL Bl'IUNINOUS R&R W1lH DRAlNlILE " NO NEW CURB ~-::4I E- EDGE MILL " OVERLAY NEW Yi^~ MAIN _ STORM SEWER ~OSSIHG REPAIR _ SANITARY SEWER REPAIR o SANITARY SEWER MH MAINTENANCE , II II II PARTRIDGE PLACE .----- . .----. ------ UTILITIES - SECTION 5 I I / / J- I ' I <: o 0::: 0::: ~o.. ~:J coo 1859 ---- --- ~ Lf) o z o <( o a:::: en I") en co >- I- Z :::> o u .... .....::.......... . \ ~ L...-_~___ o I FAIRVIEW STREET I 200 400 I I Scale in feet 1850 1858 1866 J I // I I CITY OF CENTERVILLE 2009 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 61607158FOOO.DWG DATE:8-8-07 COMM: 616-07-158 FIGURE 7 N .- Bonestroo N n (f) 0'> --i .... 0 - 0'> ~ 0 0 0 \D ;;0 Ul 0 3: -; "TI "'TI (f) 0 ;;0 n 0 m m m n CO 0 m Z ~ J> -; -; -i :::E n Gl )> m m J: Ul ~ ;;0 b:l <:;! Z J> 0 n (I) - .... C r ;;0 z r 0 -; m 0 OUl )> - CC -i r (f) AlAl m - (f) CD 3:: co ~ 0 ...... - )>c N Z Zz CO 0> ...... - G) 0 3: " G'>CD ""0 (f) cr ;;0 3: ::j1"'1 0 1"'10 Alo < )> z m --i 0 Al 3: m !?:l () m ;;0 1"'1 0 Z - 3:: -; )> ~ ""0 r I 0'> ;;0 .... ;;0 0'> 0 b I....l m ~ " m "'C ~ I .... n ~ "!. L 111 co -; n G'>NClN-"' m 0'1== 1"'1 -"' 3: 00.0 ........ -t =~ I N rB m 1"'1 = ~UI I Z -1"'1U1rr rr << --i 1"'1~(JIVIVI ~-ti!)Z:IE oj>. G'>G'>O~ ~ Al~ :J, ..... - Al I _. o 1"'1:IE:J "!. CG'>lDlO ~~!:lo 1"'1-'0 ~.E ~ CD III o OlD Al1"'103:: "TI Al ~_. o IIlX - :IE lD i! G) C ~~ ;;0 x i!~ m iil CXl . 1"'1 VI !<(JI ZO :IE VI VlO (JICD 0_ VlN 00 CDo -.,J ........ c:I ~. a o SOD TO MATCH EXISTING GRADE SREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH 2-3- DEPTH ENTIRE PLANTING BED UMITS OF OVER-EXCAVATION SOIL REPLACEMENT MIX 75 " COARSE. WASHED SAND 25" LEAF COMPOST DEEP LOOSEN EXISTING SUB-SOILS · IF STEEPER THAN 4: 1 NATIVE GRASSES SHOULD BE SUBSITUTED FOR SOD INFILTRATION BASIN TYPICAL SECTION CITY OF CENTERVILLE FIGURE 9 2009 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT .- Bonestroo 616071158F009.DWG DATE:8/22/07 COMM: 616-07-158 Lift Station #3 It has been proposed that Centerville's lift station number three (LS #3) be eliminated and a new gravity sanitary line be run from the lift station to lift station number four. A survey loop was run between the two lift stations, confirming this is physically possible. EXISTING CONDITIONS Currently, LS #3 is operated and maintained by Centerville's public works staff. The lift station was installed in 1987 and the pumps were replaced on the station in 1997 indicating a 10 year life span for these pumps. This would lead us to the assumption that the existing pumps are likely nearing the end of their useful life. The staff is spending approximately one hour of time per week at the lift station for maintenance needs. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Flow entering LS #3 would be re routed in one of two directions. In Option 1, the outgoing pipe would run south along the existing storm pond and then east along the south side of the development in the City's existing utility easement. Alternatively, the sewer could be relayed from LS #3 to the east, down Center Street. This would require re- hooking services along the way but may be slightly shorter and would replace the existing sewer which is about 20 years old. The estimated project cost of each of these options is presented in Table 2. The proposed routes are shown on Figure 10. TABLE 3. ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS FOR GRAVITY SEWER IN LIEU OF LS #3 Option 1 - South Route Option 2 - Center Street Route Item Cost Item Cost Pipe, MHs, etc. (1700 LF @35/LF) $59,500 Pipe, MHs, etc. (1600 LF @35/LF) $56,000 Jacking (under CSAH 54) $20,000 Jacking (under CSAH 54) $20,000 Connect to LS $10,000 Connect to LS $10,000 Reconnect Services $0 Reconnect Services $5,000 Restoration (turf) $15,000 Restoration (turf) $1, 000 Restoration (road - Fairview) $4,500 Restoration (road) * $- Total $109,000 Total $92,000 .THIS ASSUMES THERE ARE NO COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH RECONSTRUCTING THE ROADWAY SINCE THIS WORK IS PART OF THE PROJECT REGARDLESS OF THE CHOSEN ROUTE DUE TO THE INSTALLATION OF NEW WATER MAIN. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS Table 3 summarizes the annualized maintenance costs associated with operating LS #3. TABLE 4 - ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR LS #3 Item Cost Frequency Annualized Cost Labor (daily check) $50 Weekly $2,600 Labor (intermittent call-outs) $100 Monthly $1,200 City of Centerville 2009 Street and Utility Improvement Project .t; Bonestroo Project No: 616-07-]580 Page 22 Electricity $15 Monthly $180 Vac-Truck $500 Annual $500 Mise. Repairs (Elee. Mech., ete.) $1,000 Annually $1.000 Pump Replacement $7,500 10 years $750 Complete Rehab $30,000 30 years $1,000 Total $7,230 Table 4 summarizes the annualized maintenance costs associated with an additional 1700 LF of gravity sewer. TABLE 5- ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR 1700 LF OF GRAVITY SEWER Item Cost Freouencv Annualized Cost Jetting $425 Annually $425 Televisinq $1275 5 years $255 Total $680 RECOMMENDED SOLUTION From above, the total cost to construct the gravity sewer in Option 1 is $109,000. The net cost savings in maintenance for Option 1 is $6,550 ($ 7,230-$680). This gives us a payback period of roughly 16.6 years. From above, the total cost to construct the gravity sewer in Option 2 is $92,000. The net cost savings in maintenance for Option 2 is $ 7, 230. This gives us a payback period of roughly 12.7 years. The payback period is small enough to justify the improvements. With the additional reliability of the system, which is difficult to quantify, gained through the improvements, we would recommend installing the new gravity sewer to eliminate LS #3. Option 2 appears to be a better value in terms of how quickly the improvement will pay for itself. It is also unknown at this time, whether the south route can be constructed completely within existing drainage and utility easements. If additional easements were needed, this would also require a reexamination of the numbers. A specific route option can be chosen as part of the final design as more detailed information is gathered to evaluate each option. City of Centerville 2009 Street and Utility Improvement Project :t; Bonestroo Project No: 616-07-1580 Page 23 )v 3 ") \) STRE T <( o 0::: W 0::: CL => o )-)'-)-) -)- OPTION 1 -'- OPTION 2 I -'-- -- --------- LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS ~ L.[) . o z o <( o 0::: >- I- Z =:) o u )-)->- I I I I I I I I J J J I '- I l I I I I I I I '\ )-)-)-~ ...." . )-) .... ........ .... .... .... .... ,..",-' .... I I I I I I I I ~I _ _ ~i ~ _ _ o 150 I Scale in feet \ 300 I CITY OF CENTERVILLE 2009 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 61607158F010.DVVG DATE:8-8-07 COMM: 616-07-158 FIGURE 10 L.S. .. Bonestroo #4 F AIRVIE\t\ ! Cost Estimates Detailed cost estimates have been prepared for all improvements identified in the previous sections. These estimates can be seen in Appendix 8. The estimated cost per centerline linear foot of each of the improvement options can be seen below. TABlE 6- ESTIMATED REHABILITATION COSTS Price Per ~ Scope Foot Footage Total Cost Al Watermain Extension with Services $92.00 1200 $110,400.00 A2 Directionally Drilled Services Only $36.00 1650 $59,400.00 B' Full Reconstruction with Water Main and Services $362.00 8415 $3,046,230.00 B2 Full Reconstruction with Water Main and Services, No Curb $290.00 915 $265,350.00 BJ Full Reconstruction with Services, No Curb $285.00 1720 $490,200.00 C Full Depth Street Reconstruction $258.00 8395 $2,165,910.00 D Full Bituminous Remove & Replace, with Draintile, Curb Remains $129.00 3050 $393,450.00 E Edge Mill & Overlay $77.00 4120 $317,240.00 SubTotal Estimated Project Cost 29465 $6,848,180.00 LS#3 Abandonment $92,000.00 Urban Section for Mill Road $125 2635 $329,375.00 Water Service Connections into HomeslWell abandonment $4,500* 171** $769,500.00 Total Estimated Project Costs $8,039,055.00 .ESTlMATED COST PER HOME "ESTIMATED NUMBER OF HOMES TO BE CONNECTED All cost estimates include a 5% contingency factor and 30% indirect costs. Indirect costs include engineering design, construction inspection, staking, legal, administrative, material testing and bonding, Assessments Assessments will be calculated by City Staff and will be based on policy set by the City Council. City of Centerville 2009 Street and Utility Improvement Project # Bonestroo Project No: 616-07-1580 Page 25 Project Schedule The following is a rough schedule for the project: Feasibility Report Presented to Council Public Open House Revisions to Feasibility Report Accept Feasibility Report Preliminary Survey Improvement Hearing Plans and Specs Easements, Permits Finalize Plans Receive Bids Assessment Hearing Award Contract Begin Construction Complete Construction Water Service Hook-up Deadline* September12, 2007 October 4, 2007 October 2007 November 14, 2007 November/December 2007 January 2007 January - March 2008 April- July 2008 July 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 Spring 2009 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 * Assumes water service hook-ups are not part of the project and are the responsibility of the individual homeowner. Conclusions and Recommendations It is the finding of this study that the proposed improvements are necessary, feasible and cost effective. The following steps are recommended: . Hold an informal Public Open House to introduce the project to the public. . Adopt this report as the guide for development of the proposed improvements. · Hold a Public Improvement Hearing. . Order the preparation of plans and specifications. · Take bids. . Hold an Assessment Hearing . Install the public utilities and streets, with construction anticipated to be completed in 2009. If the City feels that the proposed improvements are too much to undertake in one year due to budgetary constraints, it is recommended that the improvements be split. The logical way to separate the proposed improvements would be in to two projects. The first would involve the reconstruction of all roads needing water main, to be constructed in 2009. The remaining street improvements should then be completed in as soon as budgets allow. City of Centerville 2009 Street and Utility Improvement Project .. Bonestroo Project No: 616-07-1580 Page 26 It is important to recognize that streets not rehabilitated in 2009 will continue to deteriorate and may pass the point in their Iifecycle where minimal improvements are useful, necessitating full reconstruction at a much higher cost. Additionally, the streets will need more intensive routine maintenance between now and that time, adding to the overall cost. City of Centerville 2009 Street and Utility Improvement Project -t; Bonestroo Project No: 616-07-1580 Page 27 Appendix A: Potential Best Management Practices City of Centerville 2009 Street and Utility Improvement Pro jeet -t; Bonestroo Project No: 6] 6-07-] 580 Page 29 Legend 50 100 w4t' S 300 Feet -# Bonestroo ~ Contours Fig. 1.1 Potential BMP Locations Peltier Lake Drive Storm Sewer ""-' parcels_update2 ~ Potential Pond Expansion o Potential Rain Garden Location o 200 1:1616161606146ICadlGISlavprojeclsICenlervllle Figure 1-4-1.mxd . Bonestroo 100 50 0 Fig. 1.2 Potential BMP Locations Peltier Lake Drive & Mill Road 100 200 w." 300 S Feet o <all other values> ~ Potential Pond Expansion o Potential Rain Garden Location 1:1616161606146ICacl\GISlavprojectsICenlerville Figure 1-4-2.mxd z.~ ~ (J) c: o +:i ctl U o .....J 0..-0 ~ctl IDO -0::: ctl +:i= a5~ ...... o 0.. C? T""" o e ...... .~ CO C> iL c: 0 ~ c: 0 0 ..J "iij c: c: Q) ('Il "E 0- X ('Il W " "'0 c: c: "16 .... 0 a: ~ a... ]! Iii en Ul :;:; a; 1:: c: E Q) Q) ~ "0 "0 0 ('Il a... Ci5 a... a... (~O o o N " ~ '" i e :> .~ LL ~ ~ c: " () :ii o " .~ fill ~ '" ~ ~ 10 lO ~ Legend "'- Contours Storm Sewer ~ Parcels ~ Potential Pond Expansion c::=J Potential Rain Garden Location Fig. 1.4 Potential BMP Locations Center Street 100 50 o 100 200 300 Feet W~E .. S Bonestroo 1:\616\61606146\CadlGI Slavprojecls\Centerville Figure 1-4-4.mxd September 2007 Appendix C: Typical Road Sections City of Centerville 2009 Street and Utility Improvement Project .tt Bonestroo Project No: 616-07-] 580 Pagd! IE 4" DRAIN TILE IE 4" DRAIN TILE SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 30' VARIES <t 16.5' 30' 16.5' DESIGN ~ GRADE 0.025' FT IE 13.5' 1 1/2"-LV3 Wearing Course Mixture, LVWE35030B (2010) 2" - LV3 Non-Wearing Course Mixture, LVNW35030B 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 20" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 1YPICAL SECTION B-1 IMPROVEMENTS SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 25' VARIES <t 14' 25' 14' DESIGN ~ GRADE 0.025' FT IE 11 ' 1 1/2"-LV3 Wearing Course Mixture, LVWE35030B (2010) 2" - LV3 Non-Wearing Course Mixture, LVNW35030B 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 20" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 1YPICAL SECTION B-1 IMPROVEMENTS (PELTIER LAKE DRIVE - CSAH 14 TO CENTERVILLE ROAD) TYPICAL ROAD SECTIONS (8-1) CITY OF CENTERVILLE APPENDB< C 2009 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 616071158APP3.DWG DATE:8/22/07 COMM: 616-07-158 . Bonestroo Ie AGGREGATE SHOULDER 30' '\ ~~'/-. ~ 12" <t 30' Ie 1 1/2"-LV3 Wearing Course Mixture, LVWE35030B (2010) 2" - LV3 Non-Wearing Course Mixture, LVNW35030B 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 20" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW GEOTEXTILE FABRIC lYPICAL SECTION B-2, B-3 IMPROVEMENTS 13' 13' DESIGN ~ GRAD 0.025' FT EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN WITH SPOT REPAIRS Ie 30-33' <t 30-33' EXIST. WIDTH VARIES VARIES 4" DRAIN TILE (lYP) EXIST. WIDTH VARIES DESIGN ~ GRADE 0.025' FT Ie VARIES 1 1/2"-LV3 Wearing Course Mixture, LVWE35030B (2010) 2" - LV3 Non-Wearing Course Mixture, LVNW35030B 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 20" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW GEOTEXTILE FABRIC lYPICAL SECTION C IMPROVEMENTS TYPICAL ROAD SECTIONS (B-2, B-3, C) .- Bonestroo CITY OF CENTERVILLE APPENDB< C 2009 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 616071158APP3.DWG DATE:8/22/07 COMM: 616-07-158 EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN WITH SPOT REPAIRS VARIES 30-33' ct 30-33' ~ ~ EXIST. WIDTH VARIES EXIST. WIDTH VARIES VARIES DESIGN ~ GRADE 0.025' FT 4" DRAIN TILE TRENCHED IN 1 1/2"-LV3 Wearing Course Mixture, LVWE35030B 2" - LV3 Non-Wearing Course Mixture, LVNW35030B EXISTING GRAVEL BASE (THICKNESS VARIES) lYPICAL SECTION D IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN WITH SPOT REPAIRS ~ 30-33' ct 30-33' ~ EXIST. WIDTH VARIES EXIST. WIDTH VARIES VARIES VARIES EDGE MILL RAD 6' (lYP) 1 1/2"-LV3 Wearing Course Mixture, LVWE35030B EXISTING BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE EXISTING BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE EXISTING GRAVEL BASE lYPICAL SECTION E IMPROVEMENTS TYPICAL ROAD SECTIONS (0, E) CITY OF CENTERVILLE APPENDB< C 2009 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT .- Bonestroo 616071158APP3.DWG DATE:8/22/07 COMM: 616-07-158