The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2007-11-14 CC Packet ter'lJi{fe T.;uW{is(w[ 1851 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSIONS & MEETING AGENDA COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING n. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION Wednesday, November 14,2007 6:00 p.m. or Shortly Thereafter (Work Session Prior and Following Regular Meeting) L CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call 1. Interview with Mr. Roland Parrcecci - P & Z Candidate (page 1) m. CONVENE TO COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL MEETING I. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call n. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Wellhead Protection Plan 2. Downtown Environmental Assessment Worksheet m. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES 1. October 24, 2007 City CouncD Work Session Meeting Minutes (page 2-3) 2. October 24, 2007 City Council Meeting Minutes (pages 4-8) 3. October 24, 2007 City CouncD Work Session Meeting Minutes (pages 9-13) V. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City of CentervUle October 25, 2007 through November 14, 2007 Oaims (page 14) 2. Centennial Fire District Claims Througb November 7, 2007 (page 15) 3. Centennial Lakes Police Department aaims Through November 7, 2007 (pages 16-17) 4. Annual Contract Renewal for 2008 - Embedded Systems, IDe. (Tornado Sirens Maintenance) * S37.9SlSirenIMonth (page 18) 5. Annual Addendum to Service Contract for 2008 - TimeSaver (Recording Secretary Services) - 3% Increase (pages 19-20) VI. A W ARDSIPRESENTATIONS/APPEARANCES VB. OLD BUSINESS VID. NEW BUSINESS 1. Res. #07-0xx. -- Delinquent Sewer/Water/Garbage Services Certification! Assessments for 1008 (Pages 11- 15) 1. Res. #07-0XX - City Grass Mowing Services Certification/Assessments for 1008 (pages 16-17) 3. Proposal to Repair & Upgrade Well #1 Pump House (page 18) 4. Eagle Pass Townhome Request for Additional Street Lighting Within the Development (page 19) 5. Planning & Zoning Recommendation - 1588 & 1580 Sorel Street (BansenlManball) Request for SubdivisionlRe-Platting of Lot Lines (pages 30-31) a. Res. #07-0XX: - Scheduling Public Hearing to Consider Vacation of Easements (Page 33) 6. Consider Appointment of Mr. Roland Parrcecci to P & Z Commission 7. Res. #07-OXX - Accepting Proposals on tbe Sale of 51,600,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds - (CSAHI4, Old Mill Road & Fairview Street Imp.) 8. Res. #07-0XX - Authorizing the Mayor to Sign & the Submission of the Safe Routes to School Application (CSAHI4/Dupre Road Underpass) (pages 34- 57) IX. ANNOUNCEMENTSIUPDA TES 1. City Administrator, Mr. Dallas Larson 1. Chancey Barett Gardens - Senior Housing/Rental Rates for 1008 3. 135/WE Coalition x. ADJOURNMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY I. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Can 1. Oath of Office 3. Election of Officen 4. Adoption of By-Laws III. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION 1. Assisting Local Businesses through Construction of CSAH 14 Impacts a. Ms. Renee Sande, Transportation Demaad Management Coordinator, AnoD County Transportation Management Organization 2. Other IV. ADJOURNMENT * * REMINDER S ** Veteran's Day - November 11, 2007 ,....... t 1 _ _r.^_ ,....., YT..I........." Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting - November 13, 2007, 6:30 p.rn. Council Chambers Comprehensive Plan Input Public Meeting - November 13, 2007, 4:30 -7:00 p.m. St. Gen's Parish Community Center 1-35E1Main Street (CSAH14) Freeway Interchange Input Meeting - November 13, 2007,4:30 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. Eaglebrook Church, 7775-20th Avenue W Thanksgiving Day - November 22, 2007 & November 23, 2007 - City Hall Closed City Council Meeting - November 38,2007,6:30 p.m. Council Chambers Work Session CITY Olf ~j:DlVILLE APPUCA'l1ON IORAPPOINTMKNT C.ftftllllilWlorC-4.,twi.mc.app1yiDafor: !/IIPPIJV(;, ..f JtJ~/~ NAME: ~~ j{ (p,1J) PA~i - STREBT ADDRESS: 70 n D ~ AlIC t!!' Rd , aTY: ~..k.ult/~ .MN ZlPCODE: 5:S7J3B HOME - ~2-'-7. --WORK. TELEPIIONE: -Y< FAX: EMAlLADDRBSS: 'Yt..A';''''~~; ~~ A.Jaf- , NIbbat of,... a CamniDe R~tt?: 712.- Ale,. ~ IIrYiD8 OD aCmllwiDe Commitfeeor OWl.,niMiaa?: Po Wbic:h One?: Tam?: Have you ~ OIl a CaIIcrYiIIc CoImaittI=c or O;.mmi_"-, in tba I*l?: kJo Whid1 One?: Which ODe?: Term?: Tam?: 81':'-- /I~ - ~ _or ~ U. r ..... to: ..un..n........ aty ofCalllnilJe 181OMain~ :'/ ' ' Council Meeting STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICEOFPUBUC~G WELL HEAD PROTECfION PLAN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City ofCenterville will be discussing the Well Head Protection Plan at a meeting scheduled for Wednesday, November 14, 2007 at the Centerville City Hall. 1880 Main Street, in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the Well Head Protection Plan. The City Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assisted devices or a sign language interpreter must be received before 4:00 p.m. November 9,2007. All persons interested are invited to attend and to be heard, verbally or in writing. You may call City Hall (651) 429-3232 if you have any questions. You may contact the City Clerk's office at (651) 429..3232 or by facsimile (651) 429- 8629 if you need additional information. If you desire, you may email: dlarson@Centervillemn.com or tbender@centervillemn.com with questions or concerns. This notice is also available on the City's web site: www.centervillemn.com. Posted in the City' s Vestibule on September 25. 2007 Teresa Bender, City Clerk Published in the Quad Community Press October 30, 2007 City of CenterviUe WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN Part 2: Draft July 3,2007 (Date) Centerville Table of Contents Chapter 1 - DA TA ELEMENTS AND ASSESSMENT 1 I. Required Data Elements.............................................................................. 1 Physical Environment Geology Precipitation Soils Surface Water Resources Land Use Data Elements Land Use Community Setting Current Land Use Future Land Use Development and Redevelopment Public Utilities Wells and Well Probability Potential Contaminant Source Inventory Water Quantity Data Elements Surface Water Quantity Groundwater Quantity Water Quality Data Elements Surface Water Quality Groundwater Quality II. Assessment of Data Elements.........................................................................9 Use of Wells Quantity and Quality of Water Land Use in DWSMAs Groundwater Use In DWSMAs Chapter :2 - IMPACT OF CHANGES ON CiTy ;.ivELLS............................................... .11 I. Changes Identified Physical Environment and Land Use Surface and Groundwater II. Impact of Changes Water Use Influence of Existing Water and Land Programs and Regulation Administrative. Technical, and Financial Considerations Chapter 3 - ISSUES, PROBLEMS, AND OPPORTUNITI ES.......................................... 13 I. Land Use Issues Related to the Drinking Water Supply Management Areas Other Wells Management of Potential Contaminant Sources Public Awareness and Cooperation DWSMAs Extending Outside the City Boundaries Evolving Wellhead Protection Program II. Financial Issues Implementation Costs State Support III. Issues Disclosed at Public Meetings and Submitted Comments Chapter 4 - WELLHEAD PROTECTION GOALS...... '" ......... ...... ...... ...... ...... ........... ....15 I. Public Education 'vv~!lb,~~d PrQt~c:tiQn Awar~i),~~Pr()je,cf ......, ..HEI';;ard6us Materials Management EdUcatiOn' II. Otl1er Wells M~nagement' , . Seal.Abandoned Wells Monitor Well Construction III. CQntaminanl Sources Potential Contaminant Source Inventol)' (PCS!) IV. City Programs Integration ... . Z<;>nJng,. Development, ~ncl.Rc;}c;leyeloP~ntContrQ' Incorporate Wellhead Protection Initiatives hltoCity Plans Vi Wat~r QlJality anclqll~ntity Man.~ge~nt ..... Groundwater QLlality Protection Minimize Demand on Water Sl.lpplySystem and Groundwater Chapter.5 - PLAN OF ACTION................................. ...........,................................. ..17 I. Public Education Wellhead protection Awareness Project Hazardous Materials Management Education II. Other W~lIs Management Seal Abanc;loned Wells Monitor Well Construction II L Contamin~nt SQurces PQtelitiai Contaminant SQurce Inventory (PeSI) IV. City Programs Integration Z~'f1ingi Developl)1ent, and' Re.c;leyelopment Controls Incorporate Wellhei;1d Protectionlnltii;1tives Ihto City PIi;1ns V. Water quality and quantity Management <:3round~ter QllCllity pr()tectiQI1 Minimize Demand on Water Supply System and Grouhdwater Ghapter 6 - EVALUATIQN PROGRAM......... ......... ... ...... ......... ...... ...,..... ... ............ ...,.23 I. Wellhead Protection Progress Report II. InCQrporation Qf Wellhead Protection Plan in COrnprehensive Plan 11'1. CommuniCations Phapter 7 - CONTINGENCY STRATEGy......'................. '.................................. ..,... ...24 L Water Supply System DElscription and Evaluation II. Wa~erSy~teroE~rgency PI~n Interconnection with Adjacent Communities Procedures for Water Allocation 111. W~.t~r System Con~ervat;on Plan Water CQnservation Potential V\fater Conservation Progra'rns . . W~llh~.!;IcI prot~ctiol'l Pr()gr~'T' IV. Jte.rftSfol' Metropolitan AreaPubli4 Suppliers Implementation Program !- FIGURES 1. Drinking Water Supply Management Areas 2. Annual Precipitation and Evapotransportation 3. Soils 4. Geologic Sensitivity 5. Land Use 6. Zoning Within DWSMA 7. Storms Sewer Map 8. Protected Waters, Wetlands, and Ditches 9. Sanitary Sewer Map 10. Transportations Routes 11. Watermain Map 12. Floodplain Areas TABLES 1. Monthly/Annual Precipitation (2001-2006) #. Potential Contaminant Source Inventory APPENDICES A Location of Probable Wells B. MDH Source Water Assesrnent C. 2006 Drinking Water Report Chapter 1 Data Elements and Assessment I. REQUIRED DATA ELEMENTS In accordance with the Minnesota Department 9rHealth's second Scoping Decision Notice (May 15, 2002) the following data elements are presented and assessed as it relates to the City of Centerville's municipal wells. The Wellhead Protection Area (\MiPA) and Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DVVSMA) of Centerville's Well #2 are vulnerable to contamination from ground surface and near surface sources. Well #1 is not vulnerable. The City's DWSMAs are provided in Figure 1. The City has evaluated the following data elements to determine their significance in the preparation and implementation of this wellhead protection plan. Physical Environment Geology The geologic environment, surrounding Centerville's municipal wells, influences the delineation of the WH PAs and well vulnerability classification. The configuration and characteristics of geologic strata directly affects the infiltration of water and aquifer vulnerability to contamination. A county geologic atlas does not exist and focused geologic studies in the metro region do not provide relevant data for the City's wellhead protection plan. No surface geophysical information was identified. The Minnesota Department of Health performed a geologic and hydrologic assessment of the ,region surrounding the City wells to aid in determining the wellhead protection area and vulnerability. Part 1 of this plan describes the geologic strata, WHPA, DWSMA, and vulnerability of the City's well. Review of representative borehole geophysical and well construction records in the DWSMA indicates that the aquifer units used by the City's wells (Jordan and Prairie du Chien) are under low-permeability protective materials typically described as sandy clay with a thickness of greater than 50 feet. The geologic review indicates that regional precipitation, soil characteristics, and surface water resources influence the aquifer units used by City wells. The regional influence of these environmental elements extends beyond the City's DWSMAs and exceeds the scope of this plan. Precipitation Precipitation recharges all aquifers. Recharge of the confined aquifers, used by City wells, takes place on a regional scale encompassing large areas outside the City's DWSMAs. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has maintained a system for monitoring hydrologic data that addresses precipitation within the metropolitan region. The primary source of moisture for precipitation in Minnesota is the tropical maritime air that moves into the State from the south and southeast. The spatial variation of average (normal) annual precipitation across Minnesota is determined by proximity to these moist air masses coming northward out of the Gulf of Mexico. Therefore, southeastern Minnesota, averaging near 32 inches, receives more precipitation than northwestern Minnesota,less than 19 inches. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 1 The normal annual precipitation for Minnesota (1961-1990) is 27.01 inches. The presence of moist vs. dry air masses also helps to determine the atmosphere's ability to absorb water vapor evaporating from soil and open-water surfaces, or transpiring from leaf surfaces (evaporation plus transpiration is called "evapotranspiration"). Western Minnesota, more frequently under the influence of dry air masses, has higher evapotranspiration rates than the eastern half of the state (see Figure 2). Temperature plays an important role in determining the amount of energy available for evapotranspiration. Because temperature patterns are determined mainly by latitude, southern Minnesota experiences more evapotranspiration than in the north. Due to its position in the continent, Minnesota is located on the boundary between the semi-humid climate regime of the eastern U.S., and the semi-arid regime to the west. Semi-humid climates are areas where average annual precipitation exceeds average annual evapotranspiration, leading to a net surplus of water. In semi-arid areas, evapotranspiration exceeds precipitation on average, creating a water deficit. In Minnesota, the boundary between the climate regimes cuts the State roughly into east-west halves (from Climate's impact on water availability; MN DNR). Centerville The City is within a semi-humid region where average annual precipitation exceeds average annual evapotranspiration, leading to a net surplus of water. No active precipitation gaging stations have been identified within the City of Centerville that can provide consistent data over extended periods. However, the Climatology Working Group (a cooperative effort state and academic organizations) has developed an interactive web site to locate and access precipitation data for the Centerville area. Based on regional data the metropolitan area receives an average annual precipitation of 28 inches. Based on a 20-year compilation of the nearest National Weather Service approved precipitation gage stations the City's average annual precipitation is 33 inches. Local precipitation is presented in Table 1. Soils Soils, within the City's DWSMA, influence the infiltration of water. The General Soil Map of Anoka County (US Dept. of Agriculture - Soil Conserv'ation Service, 1974) indicates that the area of the City's DV'vSMAs consists of the Nessel-Dundas-Webster Soil Association. The Nessel-Dundas-Webster Soil Association consists of nearly level to gently sloping moderately well drained and poorly drained soils formed in loamy glacial till. Figure 3 provides the Centerville section of the Anoka County General Soil Map. A regional study of shallow geology, including soils, has been performed to determine the sensitivity of the uppermost aquifer to contamination [Regional Hydrologic Assessment - Anoka Sand Plain (RHA-1), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 1993]. The geologic sensitivity of the uppermost aquifer to pollution is "low" to "moderate" in the City's DWSMAs. Sensitivity ratings are based on the estimated time-of-travel for water-borne contaminants, at land surface, to reach the uppermost aquifer. Low sensitivity rating indicates time-of-travel from decades to a century. Moderate sensitivity rating indicates time-of-travel from years to decades. Figure 4 provides the Centerville section of the Geologic Sensitivity Map. Water Resources Surface water resources in the City consist of Centerville and Peltier Lakes and Clearwater Creek (County ditch 47). The lakes are located in the western portion of the City approximately one-half mile outside of the City's DWSMAs. Clearwater Creek flows through the southern portion of the DWSMA for Centerville Well #2 and defines a portion of the DWSMA. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 2 Tb~Jegions rnajorriver~ (Mississippi, Minnesota and St Croix) used as grQLlndwaterflow boundaries to determine the regional flow field within aquifers are not located within the City. The regional flow field was a critical influence in the delineation of WHPAs in part 1 of this plan. The City wells draw water from the Prairie du Chein and Jordan aquifers. These aquifers exhibit confined hydrologic conditions indicating a natural hydrologic barrier from land surface. Land Use Data Elements Land use within the DWSMAs is determined using the Anoka County Geographic Information System and the Property Tax Records databases. The parcel Property Identification Numbers (PIN) and land use status (agricultural, residential, commercial, industrial, and tax exempt) are cataloged within each DWSMA. Tax exempt parcels can include government-owned land, parks, public works facilities, public and private schools, and religious institutions. The purpose of reviewing land use is to determine the extent of existing classes of land use and predicting future changes that may require additional 'City wells or system capacity. Land use changes also affect the presence of potential contaminant sources that may be introduced or removed from the City's DWSMA. Community Setting The City of Centerville was incorporated on August 11, 1857. The name was chosen because of its central location between St Paul, Stillwater, and Anoka. This was the main rest stop between Stillwater and Anoka in the earliest days of the Minnesota territory. It was originally settled by Messrs. Peltier, LaValle, and LaMotte, who platted the town in 1854. Hunters and trappers were attracted to the area in the early 1800's because of the abundance of lakes and wildlife. Families from Canada settled in the area because it reminded them of their homeland. Several descendants of the original settlers still live in Centerville. Centerville honors its history and heritage. The City celebrates its rich French-Canadian heritage at the annual Fete des Lacs (Festival of Lakes) summer celebration. The settlers cleared the land for agricultural use which became the focus of the area's economy. Businesses that supported agriculture followed. Centerville is a 2.2 square mile City located in the approximate center of the City of Lino Lakes. In the year 2000, Centerville's population was 3,202 representing an increase of 96% from the 1990 census. The City's population is estimated to increase at a rate of approximately 15% during the next three (10 year) census periods (2010, 2020, and 2030). Centerville is a suburban community that aspires to maintain its little town character. Located between the shores of Peltier Lake and Centerville Lake, residents enjoy the rural setting. The caring community that makes up Centerville is evident when people pitch in together to build park equipment, plant flowers at the school or clean up the town on Earth Day. Centerville's Past and Projected Popuiation and Households Year 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 . Population 1,633 3,202 3,700 4,100 4,700 Households 519 1,077 1,340 1,600 1,850 Source: MetroDolitan Council and US Census July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 3 Current Land Use Centerville consists of approximately 1,450 parcels in the City's 1,408 acres. The overwhelming majority of land use is residential (1,310 parcels). The 29 improved commercial and industrial parcels are concentrated along Main Street and 20TH Avenue. The remaining 148 acres of agricultural land is found in 10 parcels located primarily in the southern portion of the City. These agricultural sites present the most prominent areas of the City that may change to another land use. Figure 5 provides Centerville's land use. The two Centerville DWSMAs cover 397 parcels. Well #1 DWSMA covers 53 parcels and Well #2 DWSMA covers 344 parcels. Ten parcels in Well #2 DWSMA are located in the City of Lino Lakes. They consist of five agricultural parcels (totaling 154 acres); one single family residence parcel; and four commercial parcels (two are unimproved). The commercial parcels include an automotive service garage and fast food restaurant. The five agricultural parcels represent over 70% of the land in Centerville's DWSMA readily available for development. The City recognizes the importance of groundwater sensitivity and has established environmental protection policies that will enhance protection of groundwater in the City and the region. The City will continue to require compliance with MPCA Rules Chapter 7080 for the design, installation, maintenance, expansion and repair of private sewer systems. Aquifer contamination is usually not as much a concern in areas that are served by public water and sewer utilities, as opposed to areas that depend upon individual on-site sewage treatment systems. Approximately 23 residents and businesses are currently served by septic systems in Centerville. Parcels in Centerville's DWSMAs Well 2 -I Land Use Classification Well 1 I Not Vulnerable I Vulnerable Agriculture, Vacant (120X) 0 7 I Residential- Single Family, Vacant (21 OX) 0 20~ I Residential- Single Family, Improved (211X) 52 Patio- Townhome, Vacant/Common Areas (230X) 0 ~ Patio-Townhome, Improved (231X)_____ 0 Commercial, Vacant (340X)_______ 0 -~_I ---.---- Commercial, Improved (341X) 0 9 Industrial, Vacant (350X) 0 2 Industrial, Improved (351X) 0 6 Exempt Property (40XX) 1 5 Total Parcels 53 344 Future Land Use Development and Redevelopment The Centerville Comprehensive Plan provides a guide for managing future growth and redevelopment to maintain the community's character. Figure 6 presents the City's zoning July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 4 map. Environmental Element. The City has developed policies directed at the preservation of natural resources in areas undergoing consideration of future development. Specific environmental factors which are addressed in order to insure protection of the natural resources in the City and surrounding areas include: .. .- Ground'Nater Supply and Quality · Stormwater Drainage/Surface Water Quality · Erosion/Sedimentation Control · Shoreland Management/Floodplain Protection · Wetland Protection Groundwater Supplv and Quality. The impact of actions within Centerville regarding groundwater extends beyond the City's limits. Contamination of groundwater from fertilizers, herbicides, industry, construction, landfills and effluent form wastewater treatment facilities may affect the quality of water retrieved from wells located in and surrounding the City. Public Facilities. The City does not anticipate a need for any major public facility buildings in the foreseeable future. Public and institutional uses include City government buildings, schools, churches and medical facilities. The City will continue to conduct an ongoing evaluation of public facilities and make improvements as needed. Utilities Staoino Plan. Due to limited amount of land available within the City, it is anticipated that all the developable land within the City will be serviced by water and sewer by the year 2015. The City will examine existing sewer and water assessment policies for their impact on infrastructure replacement and development. New policies will be developed and implemented as needed. Transportation The Anoka County Highway Department is considering options to improve transportation between Interstate 35E and 35W highways that may include the expansion of Main Street (County State Aid Highway 14). Lino lakes An area of Centerville's DWSMA #2 is in Lino lakes including five large undeveloped parcels of 15- to 40-acres. Lino lakes has tentatively zoned these areas for future commercial and industrial development within the next 10 years. Lino lakes requires commercial and industrial development to include municipal sanitary sewer and water services. Wells and Well Probability Early development within the City typically preceded the presence of the municipal water supply system. As the City initiated and expanded its water supply system, the homes and other buildings with private well water systems were encouraged to connect to the municipal system. In certain cases homes and businesses, originally connected to the City's water supply, have installed a private well for irrigation or other purposes. Only the Minnesota Department of Health may license well contractors and permit the construction of wells in the City. . Wells representa potential threat to groundwater resources if riot properlysealeclWhen they are abandoned. Contamination that is spilled or leaked on the ground must migrate through many layers of soils and geologic formations before entering deep aquifers typically used by drinking water wells. This separation acts as a natural barrier requiring decades to centuries July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 5 for contaminants to affect the quality of deep wells. However, pollutants entering an abandoned well through a damaged cap or corroded casing are rapidly introduced to the aquifer that could contaminant the water supply of nearby wells. The City has performed a survey of each property within its DWSMAs to determine their potential to have a well. The survey compared the recorded year of construction with the year that City water was made available. Buildings constructed before City water was available are determined "probable" to have a well on the property. Buildings constructed in the same year that Centerville water main was available for connection, or later, are determined "not probable" to have a well on the property. The status (in use, not in use, abandoned/unsealed, or sealed) of "probable" wells was not determined. The Minnesota Department of Health is the authority that regulates well construction, maintenance, and sealing in accordance with Minnesota Statute Chap. 103/ and Minnesota Rules Chap. 4725. Of the 397 parcels located within the City's DWSMAs, 94 have been identified as probable to contain a well. Of these probable well sites, 71 parcels do not currently have a City water main available. Matching the property locations with the Minnesota Department of Health's well records has identified that one of the probable well sites has had a well sealed. Appendix 1 provides the results of the Well Probability Study for properties within the City's DWSMAs that are probable to have a well. Potential Contaminant Source Inventory Centerville's Well #2 DWSMA has been classified as vulnerable to contamination from surface and near surface contaminant sources. To assess the risk to Well #2, the City has developed an inventory of potential contaminant sources within the D\NSMA from information provided by the State and Anoka County Community Health and Environmental Services. The Potential Contaminant Source Inventory (peS!) includes: registered hazardous substance storage tanks; leaking underground storage tanks; removed storage tanks; licensed hazardous waste generators; licensed agricultural chemical storage sites; and soils and groundwater clean up sites. The pesl was developed utilizing the Anoka County Environmental Site Inventory Database that is a parcel specific. Other potential contaminant sources that cross through multiple parcels (e.g. petroleum transmission pipelines) are address in the following sections of this chapter. Table 2 provides the results of the City's PCSI. Contaminant sources may be introduced or removed from the City's DWSMA as ownership or land use changes. The PCSI has identified seven properties having potential contaminant sources. It is noted that the identified potential contaminant sites are commercial, industrial, or exempt land use. An exception is one residential-commercial property having a single family house and commercial building. Public Utilities Public utilities including roads, storm and sanitary sewers, and gas/oil transmission pipelines are constructed, maintained and monitored under Federal and State guidelines to prevent and respond to contaminant releases. Pipelines (Transmission) No gas/oil transmission pipelines are identified within the City's July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 6 .'i,DWSMAs.. Public Drainaae Public drainage systems are maintained and monitored by the City and Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) in accordance with Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act. The City has constructed a network or storm sewers in developed areas that discharge to ditches and surface water bodies. RCWD manages and maintains the ditches,'creeksand lakes.for proper use and to protect'water quality. The City and Watershed' . District coordinate surface water management through their comprehensive plans. A map of the City's storm sewer system is provided in Figure 7. A map of the protected surface water, wetlands and ditches is provided in Figure 8. Sanitary Sewers Sanitary sewers serve all of the developed portions of the City. A few on- site septic systems are currently in use at large area properties that were associated with the remaining agricultural lands. The City is committed to expanding its sanitary sewer system with future development. A map of the City's sanitary sewer system is provided in Figure 9. Transportation Roads provide the principal mode of transportation within the City. The roads serving Centerville include: State Trunk Highways (8TH) and County State Aid Highways (CSAH) providing transportation across the metro region and State; County Roads (CR) providing transportation across the County, and City streets providing access to individual prqperties within a subdivision. The significant transportation arteries in the City are 20TH Avenue (CR51/CSAH21), Main Street (CSAH14) and Centerville Road (CSAH21). The City's DW8MA crosses the City limits and includes a portion of Interstate Trunk Highway 35E in the vicinity of the intersection with Main Street. A map of major transportation routes within the DWSMA is provided in Figure 10. Municipal Water Supply Since 1988, the City has operated a public water supply (PW8ID 1020036) that currently serves 3,600. The two City wells provide all the water to the system. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources manages the City's water use through its Water Appropriations Permit Program to ensure an adequate supply that meets long-range requirements. In 2002, the total volume of water pumped from the City's wells was 66% (71 million gallons) of the permitted amount. A representation of Centerville's water-main map is provided in Figure 11. The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) oversees the safety of the City's water supply. The MDH Community Water Supply Unit is responsible for assuring compliance with the federal Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) program. Preparation of this Wellhead Protection Plan is required under the SDWA. Appendix 2 presents the MDH Source Water Assessment for Centerville's municipal wells. Currently the City is permitted to withdraw 108 million gallons of water from its wells each year. In 2002, the total volume of water pumped fromthe City's wells was 71 million gallons. Water main extension to 800 properties is planned for the next ten years. The water main extension project will include all the remaining properties within the DWSMAs. Interconnectwith Lino lakes. In 2001 an interconnect was constructed to permit Lino lakes and Centerville to draw water from each other's systems. The interconnect is metered and monitored. It is anticipated that the interconnect will provide additional reliability. Water Quantity Data Elements July 3, 2007 DRAFT~. Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 7 Surface and groundwater resources are deemed Public Waters (or Waters of the State of Minnesota). The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (ON R) manages the appropriation of water from public waters through its Water Appropriations Permit program. It is the mission of the DNR to monitor public waters and take necessary conservation measures to protect the resource from excessive withdrawal. Surface Water Quantity Centerville and Peltier Lakes are partially located in the City. These lakes are part of the Rice Creek chain and are used as reservoirs for the City of Saint Paul's public water supply system. Centerville Lake covers 455 acres with a maximum depth of 19 feet and a Littoral area (portion of the lake that is less than 15 feet in depth) of 276 feet. Peltier Lake covers 465 acres with a maximum depth of 18 feet and a Littoral area of 412 acres. These lakes discharge their water to the George Watch Lake located immediately west. Clearwater Creek (County Ditch 47), which flows during wet periods, discharges into Peltier Lake. This creek and other County and private ditches and small ponds comprise the remaining surface water found in the City. The potential flood zones provided in Figure 12 are associated with lower land areas along the lakeshore, ditch and creek. Groundwater Quantity The City's wells utilize the Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer unit to supply water to its public water supply system. Other aquifers in the area include the Quaternary (sand and gravel aquiferthat lies above the Prairie du Chien-Jordan) Franconia-lronton-Galesville, and the Mount Simon Hinckley. A 1990 investigation by the US Geological Survey (Effects of Present and Projected Ground- Water WIthdrawals on the Twin Cities Aquifer System, Minnesota; Water-Resources Investigations Report 90-4001) indicates that the total 1980 groundwater withdrawals (200 million gallons per day) represents approximately one-half of the safe yield of the regional aquifer system. An approximate limit for groundwater availability in the region is from 500 to 800 millions gallons per day. This investigation included ground\'vater vJithdra'v^v'als for lake level augmentation and building cooling systems that has since been prohibited by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The Minnesota Geological Survey's (MGS) County Well Index (CWI) and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources' (ON R) State Water Use Database System (SWU OS) were utilized to identify high-capacity wells in the area that could affect the delineation of the City's WHPA. Three high capacity wells have been identified to fall within one-mile of Centerville's wells. Information on these groundwater appropriations is provided below. WIth the exception of the City's municipal wells, no groundwater observation wells have been identified within the City's DWSMAs. ON R data of regional groundwater elevations provide information on trends in groundwater quantity. Also, the pumping records and static water levels of the City's wells continue to be collected to determine the trends in groundwater quantity and availability. No well intelierence problems have been identified by the DNR within Centerville's DWSMA or the region. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 8 Permittee Minnesota Department of Natural Resources W.!ter Appropriations Permits1 Centerville Area Resource Permit # Permitted MGIY2 2002 Reported Pum a e 'Gordoii'Rehbein Farms Groundwater '776489" 55.3 Lacasse, C ril Groundwater awrA 776104 24.0 2.4 Lino lakes \Nell #4 Groundwater CSTl 856168-4 335.03 69.1 1 adapted from the State Water Use Data System (SWU DS) 2 million gallons per year for all wells permitted 3 This ermitted number is for the total withdrawal b Lino lakes' 4 wells Water Quality Data Elements Protection of quality of surface and groundwater resources is primarily the responsibility of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA is responsible for administering the provisions of the federal Clean Water Act in Minnesota. To coordinate the protection of surface water resources the MPCA has organized its management programs based on the 10 major drainage basins. All of Centerville is within the Upper Mississippi River Basin. The Basin is made up of numerous watersheds including the Rice Creek Watershed. The Basin approach improves State coordination with local watershed districts. Surface Water Quality The MPCA has listed Clearwater Creek (Peltier lake to Bald Eagle Lake), Centerville lake and Peltier lake in its 2002 Clean Water Act section 303d List of Impaired waters. To respond to the degradation of these surface water resources the MPCA has established Target Maximum Dailey loads (TMDL) of the pollutant cause of the impairment. The City is coordinating efforts with the Rice Creek Watershed District to improve the quality of its surface water resources. Groundwater Quality Groundwater samples from the City's wells are routinely collected and analyzed for a wide variety of elements, minerals, compounds, and radioactive substances. Annual reports of the results of the analysis of City water are provided to users of the water system and available at City Hall. No contaminants have been detected in the City water supply at or above the State regulatory standards. The result of a tritium test of Well #2 indicates that the well is susceptible to rapid infiltrations (since 1953) of surface water. Currently, some contaminants were detected in trace amounts below action limits including lead and copper. The highest level of Nitrate (as Nitrogen measured in milligrams per liter) measured in the water is 0.45 mg/L. Appendix 3 provides the Centerville's 2006 Drinking Water Report II. ASSESSMENT OF DATA ELEMENTS Precipitation, Soils and Surface Water Precipitation, soils, and surface water are not wellhead protection pianning elements because July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 9 '--~ the aquifer units used by the City's wells (Prairie du Chein and Jordan), exhibit confined hydraulic conditions. As a result, these elements influence the aquifer on a regional scale which is outside the scope of this plan. Use of Wells The City's wells provide ample water volume for current demand using peak demand controls during high water demand. Additional wells and system infrastructure may be necessary if (or as) development proceeds. Consideration will be given to construction of future wells to a depth that draws water from a non-vulnerable aquifer. Monitoring and maintenance will continue for the upkeep of the wells. Quantity and Quality of Water There is a sufficient quantity of groundwater available to supply the City's system in the foreseeable future. However, long-term groundwater availability is not taken for granted and must be evaluated periodically to determine if City or regional issues develop. The quality of water from City wells meets the criteria of the MDH for drinking water. The City will continue to cooperate with the MDH to monitor its well water quality to identify any developing issues. The wells will continue to be used as groundwater quantity and quality monitoring points. Land Use in the DWSMAs The majority of land within the City's DWSMAs is single- and multi-dwelling residential use. The commercial and industrial land use represents the majority of potential contaminant sources within the DWSMAs including petroleum storage tanks, hazardous waste generators, and contamination cleanup sites. The parcels classified as exempt include State, County, and City operated facilities that may include potential contaminant sources. Groundwater Use in the DWSMAs City wells represent the dominant use of groundwater in the DWSMAs. Other users include private home wells, commercia! and industrial ....vells that do not have significant impact on the availability of groundwater for the City wells. Commercial, industrial, and other public water supply high capacity wells draw sufficient volumes of groundwater to possible impact on the City's WHPAs and were considered during delineation of WHPAs. Changes in groundwater use by other wells may impact the configuration of the City's WHPAs. The availability of groundwater to City wells is not considered to be impacted by other wells within the DWSMAs, but monitoring of static and pumping water levels may be utilized to determine trends in groundwater availability. July 3,2007 DRAFT CentelVille Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 10 Chapter 2 Impact of Changes on City Wells I. CHANGES IDENTIFIED IN: . . Phy~icale,wironm~nt.al1d !...and U~~"" ""..___, ," .. The City of Centerville had experienced a significant growth in population during the 1990- 2000 census. This is reflected in the change in land use principally from agricultural to residential. Some commercial and industrial development has taken place as well. Future changes in the physical environment will be driven by development such as expansion of storm sewers to replace ditches. Transportation The Anoka County Highway Department is investigating options to improve traffic flow between Interstate Highways 35E and 35W in the Centerville-Lino Lakes area. A potential change could include the addition of freeway ramps for 35W at Main Street (CSAH 14). A corresponding improvement of the highway would be increase commercial traffic through Centerville. Well #1 DWSMA No changes to land use within the DWSMAs for Well #1 are expected. The ~ DWSMA covers an area fully developed (between 1989 and 1994) with single family homes in three subdivisions. The remaining large parcel is a City park. Well #2 DWSMA Land use within the DWSMA for Well #2 includes 5 agricultural parcels larger than 20 acres that are located in the City of Lino Lakes. These agricultural parcels (over 150 acres and zoned for future commercial and industrial development) represent the greatest potential for changes to the physical environment in the DWSMA. Surface Water and Groundwater No significant changes are noted to surface water or groundwater. II. IMPACT OF CHANGES Water Use The demand on Centerville's water system is expected to increase by 60% in the next 10 years. It is planned to install water mains to the remaining development areas. The remaining 71 properties. in the City's DWSMAs, without water main access are included in this ten-year project. The Water System Management Plan (1997) details the expansion of the City's water system. Influence of Existing Water and Land Programs and Regulation The City's zoning and development controls guide development within the community principally to establish compatible land use development and redevelopment. Some development controls (e.g. septic system ordinance, surface water management section of development ordinance) address potential contaminant sources on a property regardless of its zoning classification. The State has numerous environmental management statutes, rules, and programs that influence construction. location, and maintenance of facilities and land use activities that represent potential contaminant sources (i.e. underground petroleum tank program). The Anoka County Groundwater Protection Assessment (June 1995) lists the potential contaminant source activities and facilities managed through State programs. Some July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 11 management strategies include mandates of the City to adopt minimum regulatory standards. These standards are modified when deemed necessary. For example, the mandatory septic system construction standards were modified to require improved wastewater treatment in wellhead protection areas. Administrative, Technical, and Financial Considerations Protection of the water quality has been address through a series of programs at the state and local level of government. These programs have focused on management of facilities and activities that have the potential to contaminate water and the City's water wells. The City will utilize these programs to provide the necessary protection of its wellhead protection areas. July 3, 2007 DRAFT CenteNille Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 12 .. Chaptef3 Issues, Problems,. and Opportunities I. LAND USE ISSUES RELATED TO THE AQUIFER, WELL WATER AND DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREAS Other Wells Unused, old, abandoned, and improperly maintained wells pose a significant threat to City wells. Such wells can act as a conduit for introduction of contaminants directly into an aquifer. Since 1974, the Minnesota Department of Health, through its Well Management Program, has permitted the construction of wells and licensed contractors. State law and rules apply to all wells, including those constructed before 1974. Through the Well Code (MN Rule 4725) the MDH regulates the construction of new wells and sealing of unused wells. The City is prohibited from managing wells construction. The problem with managing wells within the DVVSMA is that the existence, location and status of a majority of the wells are unknown. The City has an opportunity to enhance wellhead protection by cooperating with the MDH Well Management Program in locating and sealing abandoned wells and documenting the construction of new wells within its building permits program. Management of Potential Contaminant Sources Existing management of potential contaminant sources presents an issue and opportunity for the City's wellhead protection plan. Many of the potential contaminant sources or groundwater management issues that exist within the DWSMAs are monitored and regulated through a labyrinth of state agencies and programs. These programs (detailed in the Anoka County Groundwater Protection Assessment) focus on a single land use or activity by a designated state agency such as: Hazardous waste generators - MPCA and County Environmental Services; Commercial agricultural chemicals and practices - MDA; Petroleum and hazardous substance storage tanks - M PCA; Well contractor licensing, construction code and maintenance - MDH; Water appropriations by large capacity wells - MDNR Soils and groundwater contamination - MPCA; and Soils and groundwater contamination related to agricultural chemicals - MDA. The City exercises "'land use control" though its zoning and development ordinances but preemptive State programs for the environmental management have addressed facilities and activities that represent potential contaminant sources within the DWSMAs. The Anoka County Groundwater Protection Assessment has cataloged the various potential contaminant sources. management programs. and opportunities to enhance groundwater protection. The Assessment was used to assist the City in developing this Wellhead Protection Plan. Public Awareness and Cooperation The success of this wellhead protection plan rests on the cooperation of property owners, residents. and businesses within the City's DWSMAs. State programs manage many of the potential contaminant sources at commercial and industrial sites. But the management of sources on the numerous residential properties (that make up 84% of the City) may not be adequately addressed. The variety of activities and contaminant sources that residents may introduce within the City's DWSMAs is broad. Property owners informed of the community July 3, 2007 DRAFT CenteNille Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 13 effort to protect the drinking water supply are likely to cooperate with requests and guidelines to protect the City's wells. DWSMAs Extending Outside the City Boundaries The Drinking Water Supply Management Areas for Well #14 extends outside of the City into the City of Lexington. Fortunately Lexington is a partner in the City's water utility management program and wellhead protection planning group. Evolving Wellhead Protection Program The evolution of the state's Public Water Supply management program is a consideration for the City in wellhead protection plan preparation and implementation. As experience is gained - the plan itself sometimes must be altered as program mandates are altered or expanded. For example, the potential for a terrorist attack lead to immediate upgrade of the security for the City's water system. Such an alteration represents a significant cost when an early investment of resources and detailed planning is altered or abandoned. However, a measured approach permits the City flexibility to respond to new challenges and observe the effectiveness of initiatives as we move along a planned path to achieve our protection goals. Nonpoint Source Pollution Management Many programs currently exist for the management of nonpoint sources of water pollution from residents and property owners. These existing programs provide an opportunity for the City to enhance the protection of its wells by emphasizing existing nonpoint source management initiatives that address water quality within the DWSMAs. II. FINANCIAL ISSUES Implementation Costs The cost of implementing the wellhead protection plan is a consideration. This mandate is made without providing sufficient funds to comply. As a result, the City must balance its revenue with increasing fiscal demands that include the implementation of the wellhead protection plan. State Support State support for the implementation of the Wellhead Protection Plan is in the form of providing advisory and cooperation in existing programs. No funding is provided to implement the Plan. However, the Minnesota Department of Health has provided valuable support to the City in the preparation of the first part of the plan by delineation of the wellhead protection areas and well vulnerability assessments. Such support by existing State programs can enhance the City's plan. If State programs (i.e. well management, hazardous waste management, ground water cleanup, etc.) were not effective; the City may have to determine its role in regulating these potential contaminant sources to protect its wells. In a sense, these programs reduce the financial burden of the City to manage these potential contaminant sources. III. ISSUES DISCLOSED AT PUBLIC MEETINGS AND SUBMITTED COMMENTS The Metropolitan Council submitted the following comments on regarding development of the City's wellhead protection plan: · Upon submittal of WHPA delineations, the Met Council will determine the adequacy for review as a local comprehensive plan amendment, and notify each city on how it will proceed. . The Met Council will be looking for special protective measures for the numerous Drift wells, particularly in the vicinity of known groundwater contamination areas. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 14 July 3, 2007 DRAFT CenteNille Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 15 Chapter 4 Wellhead Protection Goals Ultimate Goal The ultimate goal of this wellhead protection plan is the sustained quality and quantity of groundwater for the City's water supply system. To achieve this, the City has identified goals to address specific initiatives and issues. I. PUBLIC EDUCA TION A. Wellhead Protection Awareness Project An education program is critical to protect the City's water supply and gain the cooperation of property owners and businesses within the DWSMAs. The goal of the Wellhead Protection Awareness Project is to notify property owners and residents of the location and coverage of the City's DVVSMAs. B. Hazardous Materials Management Education This effort will educate residents and businesses regarding proper handling, use, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials within the DWSMAs through augmentation of existing environmental education programs. This initiative will not address businesses that are currently licensed hazardous waste generators already required to meet State management standards. II. OTHER WELLS MANAGEMENT A. Seal Abandoned Wells Cooperate with the MDH Well Management Program to seal all abandoned wells within the DWSMAs. The City has developed a list of properties, within its DWSMAs, that have the probability of having a well based on the date of the construction of the building and the date when City water main was available to the property. B. Monitor Well Construction Cooperate with the MDH Well Management Program to monitor and maintain accurate records of the construction of wells within the City. This project will improve the location accuracy of constructed wells by having a local official verify the location information submitted by the licensed well contractor. III. CONTAMINANT SOURCES A. Potential Contaminant Source Inventory (PCSI) Determine the extent of potential contaminant sources located inside the City's vulnerable DWSMA for Well #2. The PCSI will be maintained to monitor contaminant sources. IV. CITY PROGRAMS INTEGRATION A. Zoning, Development, and Redevelopment Controls Determine the compatibility of utilizing City land use and development programs to enhance wellhead protection. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 16 B.ln~orporat~ Well~ead.P.rotectiol'1lpit!~tesiJ1tc)Pi~YPI~ns .. ............................ ..... .. ..... The City will use this We Hhead ProteCtion Planasifi'esource when updating its Comprehensive Plan, local water management plan, water supply plan, and other relevant plans. V. WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY MANAGEMENT A. Groundwater Quality Protection Monitor the chemistry of the aquifer units providing water to its wells and investigate significant changes in water quality. B. Minimize Demand on Water Supply System and Groundwater Efficiently use of groundwater resources available to the City. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 17 Chapter 5 Plan of Action I. PUBLIC EDUCA liON PROGRAM An education program is critical to protect the City's water supply and gain the cooperation of property owners and businesses within the DWSMAs. A packet will be developed to present the various education materials to the property owners and others within the DWSMAs. Additional packets will be provided to new property owners and facility operators. A. Wellhead Protection Awareness Project Objective: The cooperation of property owners, facility operators and others is critical for the City to achieve our wellhead protection goals. The Wellhead Protection Awareness Program is intended to gain the cooperation of residents and business operators in the City's wellhead protection efforts. Actions: (1) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will notify property owners that they are located within the City's DWSMA. The notification will include a wellhead protection education packet providing information on the City's wellhead protection program. (2) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will installed signs in the right of way indicating the boundaries of the DWSMAs. (3) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will include wellhead protection information in their annual water quality report of their water supply system. (4) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will prepare a press release and issue a briefing report for newspaper and other media outlets on timely issues that coincide with an initiative such as an abandoned well information meeting or the installation of DVVSMA zone signs. (5) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will make DWSMA. maps available to consultants, septic system evaluators, and other interested persons that perform environmental evaluations. Cooperator(s): [City] Anoka County Municipal Wellhead Planning Group, Anoka County Environmental Services lime Frame: 2 1/2 years from the completion of the plan. Estimated Cost: ($ 1.50 per parcel within DWSMA) Goal Achieved: (1) Preparation and delivery of a wellhead protection information packet. (2) Installation of ROW signs indicating the boundary of DWSMAs. (3) Annual Water Quality Report that includes WHP update. B. Hazardous Materials Management Education Objective: Educate residents and businesses regarding proper handling, use, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials within the DWSMAs through augmentation of existing environmental education programs. This initiative will not address businesses that are currently licensed hazardous waste generators which are required to meet State management standards. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 18 Actions: (1) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will include proper management of hazardous materials and waste information into the Wellhead Protection Awareness education packet. The packet will include contact numbers to obtain consultative services from City, County and State program staff (Le. utilities, hazardous waste management, and . . petroleum tanks programs). ..... . .... (2) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will utilize newsletters, cable access, news releases and other forums to promote the proper management of hazardous materials including use of the Anoka County Household Hazardous Waste drop-off facility. Cooperator{s): Anoka County Integrated Waste Management Unit Time Frame: 2 1/2 years from the completion of the plan. Estimated Cost: ($0.50 per parcel within DWSMA) Goal Achieved: (1) Preparation and delivery of a Hazardous Materials Management information packet. (2) A 5% increase in the number of households that utilizes the Anoka County Household Hazardous Waste drop-off facility. II. OTHER WELLS MANAGEMENT The presence of other wells within the City's DWSMAs presents the potential for contamination sources, at or near land surface, to be rapidly introduced into the aquifer used by the City's wells. Eventually, all wells become unused or unusable. State law requires unused wells to be properly sealed. However, the location and status of wells has not been adequately monitored. A. Seal Abandoned Wells Objective: Enhance the protection of the City's wells by Cooperating with the MDH Well Management Program to seal all abandoned wells within the DVVSMAs. Actions: (1) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will investigate potential sources of financial assistance and the establishment of a program to assist property owners in sealing their abandoned wells. The investigation will include Federal and State grant programs and a City low-interest loan program. (2) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will notify property owners with the probability of a well located on their property. The notification will include contact numbers for property owners to obtain consultative services regarding methods to locate and seal abandoned wells and an announcement of a public informational meeting. (3) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will sponsor a public meeting in which MDH Well Management staff will provide an informational program and answer questions. (4) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will request that the MDH provide a copy of well sealing reports. The location of the sealed wells will be verified and placed in the building officials parcel files.. . (5) The Building Official will incorporate the list of probable wells into the City's Building records. \l\lhen application is made to demolish a building the records will be reviewed to determine if a well search is required. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 19 Cooperator(s): Minnesota Department of Health and Anoka County Environmental Services. Time Frame: 5 years from the approval of the plan. Estimated Cost: ($0.20 per parcel within DWSMA) Goal Achieved: (1) Completion of the investigation and actions initiated. (2) Completion of notification to property owners. (3) Completion of public meeting. (4) Incorporation of probable well sites into City parcel files. B. Monitor Well Construction Objective: Cooperate with the MDH Well Management Program to monitor and maintain accurate records of the construction of wells within the City. This project will improve the location accuracy of constructed wells by having a local official verify the location information submitted by the licensed well contractor. Actions: (1) The City Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will request the MDH to provide a copy of reports for new well construction in the City. The City will place the copy into the building official's file for the parcel. If information regarding the location of the well is insufficient to determine the parcel location - the City will notify the MDH and request that they follow up with the licensed well contractor to obtain sufficient information. (2) The City Building Official will place the copy of the well record in the parcel file which is reviewed when application is made for building permits or lot development. (3) The City Utilities Department will require owners of buildings that switch from a private well to City water submit a copy of the well sealing report within 6 months. If the well remains in use the property owner must submit a statement of the intended use of the 'vvell. The 'vvell sealing repOit or statement or intended use will be forwarded to the building official to be place in the parcel file. Cooperator(s): Minnesota Department of Health. Time Frame: 5 years from the approval of the plan. Estimated Cost: ($0.20 per parcel within DWSMA) Goal Achieved: The goal is for sustained monitoring of constructed wells through a cooperative effort of the City and MDH. This is an ongoing project without a date for completion. III. CONTAMINANT SOURCES A. Potential Contaminant Source Inventory (PCSI) Objective: Track the extent of potential contaminant sources located inside the City's vulnerable DWSMA. The PCSI will be maintained to monitor contaminant sources. Actions: (1) The Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will mairitain its PCSI database making updates July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 20 to the inventory asn~Y1 informaJicm isc()llege~:. _ .... ..... ..... .. (2) The Wellhead ProteCtion Pia-ii Manager will regularly request that Anoka County Community Health and Environmental Services Department provide updates of potential contaminant source information from its Environmental Site Index. The City will incorporate new and changed information into its PCSI database. Cooperator(s): Anoka County Community Health and Environmental Services Department Time Frame: This is an ongoing activity. Estimated Cost: ($0.07/yr. per parcel within DWSMAs) Goal Achieved: (1) Current PCSI database. _. (2) Demonstrated cooperation between the City and Anoka County. IV. CITY PROGRAMS INTEGRATION \ A. Zoning, Development, and Redevelopment Controls Objective: Determine the compatibility of utilizing City land use and development programs to enhance wellhead protection. Actions: (1) The Wellhead Protection Manager will make present~tions before the City Council, Zoning Board and other relative committees about methods to enhance the City's wellhead protection plan. (2) The Wellhead Protection Manager will consult with planning and zoning officials to determine the feasibility of modifying official controls to support the protection of the City's water supply wells. Draft modifications will be presented in the form and manner required for consideration. Cooperator(s): City Council and staff Time Frame: 2 years from the completion of the plan. Estimated Cost: ($0.12 per parcel within DWSMA) Goal Achieved: (1) WH P Manager's presentation to City Council and other committees. (2) City consideration of modification of official controls to support wellhead protection. B.lncorporate Wellhead Protection Initiates into City Plans Objective: The City will use this Wellhead Protection Plan as a resource when updating its Comprehensive Plan, local water management plan, water supply plan, and other relevant plans. Actions: (1) Wlen the City's Comprehensive Plan is next updated, a section will be added to address wellhead protection initiatives that are in this wellhead protection plan. (2) The City will include compatible wellhead protection initiatives into its local water management and water supply plans. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 21 (3) The City will cooperate with the City of Lino Lakes to address land use management issues for the portion of the DWSMAs outside the Centerville. Cooperator(s): City of Lino Lakes. Time Frame: Coincident with the City of Lino Lakes Wellhead Protection Plan preparation. Estimated Cost: ($0.04 per parcel within DWSMA) Goal Achieved: (1) Updated comprehensive plan completed that includes wellhead protection initiatives. (2) Local Water Management Plan that includes wellhead protection initiatives. (3) Water Supply Plan that includes wellhead protection initiatives. V. WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY MANAGEMENT A. Groundwater Quality Protection Objective: Monitor the chemistJy of the aquifer units providing water to its wells and investigate significant changes in water quality. Actions: (1) The Wellhead Protection Manager will continue to monitor the water quality of its public water supply wells in accordance with MDH rules. (2) The results of the monitoring will continue to be summarized in the City's annual Water Quality Report. (3) The City will create and maintain a historical database of water quality testing results for its wells. The parameters that will be monitored include concentrations of organic and inorganic compounds, radiological results, and microorganisms detected. The database will be reviewed periodically to determine trends in water quality changes. (4) If review of the database indicates a significant change in the concentration of a potential contaminant, the will consult with the Minnesota Department of Health and attempt to identify the source(s) of the pollutant using its PCSI database. Cooperator(s): Minnesota Department of Health Time Frame: 1 year from the completion of the plan. Estimated Cost: ($0.05 per parcel within DWSMA) Goal Achieved: (1) Existing water quality monitoring programs continue to be implemented. (2) Water Quality Reports are disseminated annually. (3) Creation of a historical water quality database for City wells that is updated with routine water quality test results. B. Minimize Demand on Water Supply System and Groundwater Objective: Efficient use of groundwater resources available to the City. Actions: (1) Continue to enforce Centerville Ordinance #63 that prohibits lawn/garden watering during the day and odd-even sprinkling ban during the morning. Ordinance is in effect July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 22 from May1through~ept~mper1 thr()u~hoLltth~City. (2) Educater~sidents 'andbcusinessesongociCl water use practices and water conservation.' (3)' Require water-conserving fixtures in construction ordinances according to state policies and codes. Cooperator(s): None Time Frame: This is an ongoing activity. Estimated Cost: ($0.05 per parcel within DWSMA) Goal Achieved: (4) Existing water conservation programs continued to be implemented. (5) Ban of mid-day sprinkling implemented. I July 3, 2007 DRAFT CenteNille Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 23 Chapter 6 Evaluation Program The evaluation program will determine the progress of the City to implement its plan of action. Evaluations must be conducted at least every 2.5 years or when the wellhead plan is amended. To evaluate progress in achieving plan goals the City will perform the following. I. WELLHEAD PROTECTION PROGRESS REPORT Every two years the Wellhead Protection Plan Manager will prepare a Progress Report that will: 1. Discuss developments that have affected the Wellhead Protection Plan; 2. Briefly discuss the outcomes of the Wellhead Protection Awareness Project and Hazardous Materials Management Education Project; 3. List the number of wells sealed in the City since adoption of the plan; 4. Provide an update of the Potential Contaminant Source Inventory; 5. Summarize the historical and most recent water quality monitoring results; 6. Summarize the historical and most recent water use data and briefly discuss the effectiveness of efforts at reducing water demand; and 7. Present a plan for action to meet the remaining objectives of the wellhead protection plan. II. INCORPORATION OF WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN IN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Wellhead Protection Plan will be incorporated into the City's Comprehensive Plan during the next plan update. III. COMMUNICATIONS The City will maintain records of contacts for the distribution the wellhead plan and Wellhead Protection Awareness Project. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 24 Ch9pter.7~< Contingency Strategy for Water Supply The following summarizes the City's alternative water supply plan and contingency strategy that is detailed in the Comprehensive Water Plan - City of Centerville (February 1997). Water . syst~m cbaracteristics, water user priority, emergency equipment and contact l1umbers qan be found in the plan. Prior to 1988, the City of Centerville did not have a municipal water system. An initial "M aster Plan for the Development of a Municipal Water System" was written in July 1987 to address the development of a municipal water system. In the 1980's and 1990s, Centerville experienced rapid increase in population that this plan addresses. Historical Development Trends The City started experiencing dramatic growth during the 1980s. This growth trend is expected to continue throughout the next 15 to 20 years. As is commonly the case in rural communities such as Centerville, not everyone within the city limits is connected to and served by the City's water system (due to the use of private wells). In fact, not everyone with a service connection uses the City's water. There are a number of customers who are provided with connections, but who use private wells as their source of water. These customers will be added over time as repair or reconstructions of private water systems are not allowed by the City where Municipal water is available. Planned Development and Population Forecasts The Metropolitan Council's predicted number of households for the year 2020 is 1 J 750, and the total population projected is 4,650. Projected Service Area Population City of Centerville Year Total Persons per Total % of Pop. Service Area Households Household PODulation Served Population 2000 1,000 3.1 3050 89% 2715 2005 1,200 2.9 3,500 93% 3,255 2010 1400 2.8 3,950 95% 3755 2015 1,575 2.7 4300 97% 4170 2020 1,750 2.7 4650 99% 4600 Population and household data was interpolated from 1994 Metropolitan Council blueprint forecast data. The percentage of Centerville's population that will be served by City water was determined using the following assumptions: · All development in the City what is outside of the current MUSA boundary will be connected to the City's water system. · Service will eventually be extended to some presently developed areas within the current MUSA boundary, including Center Oaks, the Peltier Lake Hills additions, L'Allier Estates, and along Centerville Road between Westview Street and Center Street. Most population growth is expected to occur in the northern, central. and southern portions of Centervillej due to the access provided by proposed collector streets, while commercial and industrial growth is expected to occur in the eastern area of the City. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 25 Historical Water Use Centerville maintains records of the annual volume of raw water pumped from its wells, as well as the volume of water sold to its customers. These records permit evaluation of all the components of water demand and use by residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional users. Historic Population and Water Service Information City of Centerville Year Service Area Service Total Water Total Water Population Connections Sold (1,000 gal) Pumped from Wells (1,000 gal) 1999 2550 642 55,264 56,707 2000 2620 668 66,327 78,652 2001 2732 733 76105 82,865 2002 2855 830 -- __---11 ,169 _ 71,210 -- 2003 2980 868 86,967 97,576 2004 3050 897 82,086 80,867 2005 3110 922 80,167 86,812 2006 3130 935 95,?73 I 96,987 Averaae 2878 853 76,669 84,460 Average (w/o 19(8 852 76,669 81,460 school POD.) Service Area population includes Centerville Elementary population of 900 students. Source: City pumping and billing records Water Demand by Customer Centerville Elementary is the only institutional user. I -I ~ - ----- __u _ u___. --- -.I _ City of Centerville Year Water Sold (1,000 aallons) Residential Comm/lnd/lnst. Total 2000 _59,110__ _ ----.L21O__ _~i~_ 2001 62,161 10,944 73,1 05 2002 64,777 6,392 (1 ,1 69 2003 i f7 , 160 9,807 86,970 i 2004 I 73,030 9,056 82,086 2005 : 70,820 10,186 80,1 86 2006 81,142 14,131 95,273 Source: City V</ater billing records Annual WCJt~r lJ~~ hu r.ustomer Category Seasonal and Peak Water Demands January and July water pumpages are typically used to evaluate the relationship between winter and summer use. The table below presents seasonal demands for eight years, average winter and sLImmer daily demands are approximately 154,107 gallons and 402,113 gallons, respectively. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 26 . January I July Water Demands Citv of Centerville Year Averaoe Pumpaoe (opd) July to Jan Januarv Julv Ratio 1999 89,161 247,126 2.80 2000 125,161 269,580 2.15 2001 254,161 413,870 1.62 2002 148,354 357,096 2.40 2003 146,194 351,616 2.40 2004 139,094 478,257 3.43 2005 153,255 485,839 3.17 2006 177,483 613,516 3.45 AVO.(1) 154,107 402,113 2.67 EMERGENCY PLAN FOR CENTERVILLE'S PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM The purpose of the Emerg~ncy (contingency) Plan is to increase emergency preparedness and to provide the City with a course of action to follow during conditions that require a curtailment of water service. Potential situations that could reduce water service include natural disasters such as drought, flood or tornado, or manmade conditions such as water source contamination, and equipment and power failures. Emergency Plans were mandated by Chapter 186 of the State of Minnesota 1993 legislative session./aws. The Comprehensive Water Plan has been formulated to meet these requirements, the Department of Natural Resources Rule, and the Metropolitan Council guidelines for water emergency and conservation plans. Emergency Telephone List In case of an emergency condition, it is critical that the appropriate individuals and agencies are contacted. The City maintains an Emergency Contact List that contains personal contact numbers of key staff. Five City staff make up the Emergency Event Evaluation Team (EEET) that performs assignments including contacting communities or agencies in the event of an emergency. During a water supply emergency the EEET will evaluate the condition, contact affected communities/agencies, and determine the City response to cope with the event. Conjunctive Use of Surface and Groundwater Centerville Lake is a possible alternative/conjunctive source of water for the City. Centerville and Peltier Lakes were created in 1912 wit the construction of a dam by the Saint Paul Water Utility (SPWU), which owns the water rights tolJoth Il;lkes and much of the surrounding land. Prior to using the Mississippi River as its primary source, the lakes provided as much as 25 MGD, most recently during the drought of 1988. The SPVW would consider an agreement with Centerville to use these lakes as an emergency source of water. July 3. 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 27 There is a potential for conjunctive use of Centerville Lake and the City's existing wells. However the additional costs and delay in constructing and initiating an approved water treatment plant to achieve minimum drinking water quality standards makes this an impractical option. Alternative Sources of Water Prior to its connection with the City's water system, Centerville Elementary operated its own water system, which included a private well with a capacity of 500 gpm. When the school connected to City water the well was disconnected and used in a separate irrigation system. Considering the age and additional requirements for a public water supply well, the school well may not meet current standards. However, the use of the well as an emergency source would be possible: · The well itself would need to be brought into compliance with state standards for municipal wells. · The City would be required to obtain either ownership or control by easement of the area within 50-feet of the well. · Equipment modifications would have to be made, including the installation of a booster pump, shut-off valves, backflow prevention device, and chemical feed apparatus. With the anticipated interconnection with the City of Lino Lakes water supply system - this alternative is not recommended. [NOTE: The City of Centerville and Lino Lakes have established an interconnection between their water systems and a mutual aid agreement to cooperate in responding to a water supply emergency. ] Short-Term Demand Reduction Procedures 1. Voluntary Reduction Measures: Contact the media and issue a notice to the City that there is an imminent water shortage and request a voluntary reduction from residents. 2. Sprinklinq Bans: Instigate an odd/even or a total sprinkling ban in an extreme emergency. [NOTE: Centerville has established a sprinkling ban (Ordinance #63) as recommended in fJ-.;C'o ~/~_ 1 Ullo,j /J'C/I.J 3. Water Allocation Restrictions: For extended or severe of emergency conditions, the water use priorities in the Procedure for Water Allocation (listed below) should be implemented. Procedures for Water Allocation The following recommended procedures for water allocation are: First Priority. Domestic water supply, excluding industrial and commercial uses and use for power production. Second Priority. Water uses involving consumption of less than 10,000 gallons per day. Third Priority. Agricultural irrigation and process on agricultural products. Fourth Priority. Power production in excess of the use provided for in the contingency plan under first priority. Fifth Priority. Uses, other than agricultural irrigation, processing of agricultural products, and power production. Sixth Priority. Non-essential uses. These uses are defined by Minnesota Statutes 103G.291 as lawn sprinkling, vehicle washing, golf course and park irrigation, and other non-essential uses. Non-essential uses of water are the lowest use priority and will be the first water use subject to allocation restrictions. Quick responses to restrict non-essential uses of water during periods of limited supplies will help protect domestic and economic uses of water. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 28 Waterused for human needs at hospitals, nursing homes, and similar types of facilities are high priority to be maintained in an emergency. Local water allocation will need to address water used for other human needs at other types of facilities such as hotels, office buildings, and manufacturing plants. Domestic use must have priority over economic needs. Triggers for implementing Plan Components The current average day demand is 265,700 gallons and the average peak day demand for the past eight years is approximately 2.7 time the current day demand, or 715,000 gallons. The 500,000 gallons available storage capacity in the City's elevated storage tank can provide almost two days of average demand and slightly more than a half day at peak demand. Tower level is critical to maintain pressure in the distribution system. The most critical component of the Centerville system is the pumping capacity from its wells. Centerville's firm capacity is 550 gpm (0.675 MGD) with its largest well (650 gpm) out of service. Triggers for implementing plan components are based on firm capacity. The triggers (shown in the table below) are guidelines for the Emergency Evaluation Team in the event of a water supply emergency that warrants short-term demand reduction. Triggers to Reduce Short-Term Demand Eliminate 5th through 2nd priority water use. (1) Allocating water use based on the priorities stipulated in Minnesota Statute is not possible with the City's available water use data. Therefore, it is not possible to determine how much water will be saved by various demand reduction measures. Enforcement Centerville has established provisions in its City Code that allow it to place restrictions on water use and enforce any such provisions a,s necessary. City Code Chapter 51 regulates use of the Municipal Water System, reads, "... the Administrator is authorized to implement water use restrictions and demand reduction measures as identified in the City's Water Supply and Emergency Conservation Plan." As detailed in Section 51.05(C), "service may be discontinued whenever... the owner or occupant of the premises served.. .has violated any requirement of the city code relative thereto" [NOTE: Centerviffe has established a sprinkling restriction to odd-even days and between 10:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. July 3, 2007 DRAFT Centerville Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 2) Page 29 Part 2 City of Centerville - Wellhead Protection Plan Figure 1 DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREAS 10-year Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) The wellhead protection areas are determined using a model that simulates groundwater flow and the capture zone for each well over a period of 10 years. Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) Vulnerability Rating The Drinking Water Supply Management Areas were established following delineation of the WHPAs. DWSMAs boarders are based on easily identifiable landmarks including property lines, streets, and ditches Centerville's DWSMAs extend into the City of Lino Lakes Vulnerability Rating The vulnerability of Centerville's municipal wells and surrounding groundwater aquifer to contamination has been determined through evaluation of well construction and aquifer characteristics. Centerville Well #1 is designated to be non-vulnerable. Centerville Well #2 is desianated to be vulnerable. Part 2 City of Centerville - Wellhead Protection Plan Figure 2 Annual Precipitation and Evapotranspiration Normal Annual Precipitation (1961 - 1990) 36 It. 32 30 21 ",26 J,j 2.. 22 20 18 16 inches Annual Precipitation minus Ev a p 0 tr a n s p i r a ti 0 n 12 1Il e 6 f. 2 'M [] -2 -f. -6 -B -1lJ inches From Climate's Impact on Water Availability (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) Part 2 City of Centerville- Wellhead Protection Plan Excerpt of plate 60 So\l $urveyof Anoka County, Minnesota; United states Department of Agriculture - SOil Conservation Service, Issued September 1977. -e;~' -~~--'-:". -""', See Website for Attachments & Exhibits PRINTER'S AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION , 4~lher, or the publisher's designated agent, being duly sworn, on he r.:at I am the publisher, or the publisher's designated agent and an the newspaper known as The Quad Community Press, and that I have full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: (A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, and amended. (B) The printed CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICE~AVAILIBILITY OF ENVIRON. ASSESS. WKSHEET which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and ~as printed and published once each week, for 1 successive weeks; it was first published on -TUERYA-Y , the 25 day of S~PT.E'MB.E'R . 20~ and was thereafter printed and published on every to and including . the day of . 20_; and printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz BY: (l~ L9aJ2 TITLE: Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 26 day of SEPTEMBER ,20~. SHA~ON L. HILL NOTARy puBuC. MINNESOTA EXPIRES JAN. 31,2011 Notary Public, Minn. RATE INFORMATION ................................................................................................................................................................................. (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space. $ (Line, word or inch rate) (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter. $ ~ord or inch rate) .~ (3) ~ actually charged for the above matter. .~..- .$~~"-INCH -(I...ifie,word or inch rate) tervi{{e XsttWfisfietl1857 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET CENTERVILLE DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT September 12, 2007 Projea Number: 000616-07162-0 Revised 2/05 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Note to preparers: This form is available at httn://www.cQb.state.mn.us. EAW Guidelines are also available at the web site. The Environmental Assessment Worksheet provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EA W is prepared by the Responsible Governmental Unit or its agents to determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement should be prepared. The project proposer must supply any reasonably accessible data for - but should not complete - the final worksheet. If a complete answer does not fit in the space allotted, attach additional sheets as necessary. The complete question as well as the answer must be included if the EA W is prepared electronically. Note to reviewers: Corrunents must be submitted to the ROD during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EA W in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Project title Centerville Downtown Redevelopment 2. Proposer Beard Group 3. RGU City ofCenterville Contact person: Ron Mehl Title: Development Principal Address: 750 2nd Street NE, Suite 100 City, state, ZIP: Hopkins, MN 55343 Phone: 952-930-0630 Fax: 952-930-0631 E-mail: ronm@bcardgroupinc.com Contact person: Dallas Larson Title: Administrator Address: 1880 Main Street City, state, ZIP: Centerville, MN 55038-9794 Phone: 651-429-3232 Fax: 651-429-8629 E-mail: dlarson@centervillemn.com 4. Reason for EA W preparation (check one) EIS scoping _ Mandatory EA W ---L Citizen petition _ RGU discretion Proposer volunteered _ If EA W or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number and subpart name: The project is a mixed use residential/commercial development project. An EA W is required under 4410.4300, subpart 32 Mixed Residential and Industrial-Commercial Projects. 5. Project location City Centerville Township Township 31N Range 22W County Anoka _114 NW 114 Sections 23 2 ". . - -., ',.".'- --" - - ' Aitachntentsand Figures/or the EA W: Attachments: Attachment 1: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program response to inquiry, August 13,2007 Attachment 2: Traffic Analysis, August 24, 2007 Attachment 3: Noise and Air Quality Impact Analysis, September, 2007 Attachment 4: Minnesota Historical Society State Historic Preservation Office response to inquiry, August 16,2007 Figures: Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Project Location Map USGS Topographic Map Concept Plan Existing Conditions Wetlands and Public Waters Shore land Buffer Zone FEMA Floodplain Zone Anoka County Soils Survey 6. Description a. Provide a project summary of 50 words or less to be published in the EQB Monitor. Redevelopment of Centerville' s existing downtown area. New buildings will be a mix of retail or commercial and multifamily housing. Retail and commercial space will be available on the fIrst floor of buildings along Main Street and Centerville Road with condo style homes above. Surrounding blocks will be filled with townhomes. b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new - construction. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Emphasize construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes. Include modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes and significant demolition, removal or remodeling of ,e-xis.ting structures. Indicate the timing and duration of construction activities. The redevelopment of Centerville's existing downtown area to multi family housing (374 units) and commercial retail and office space (63,000 square feet) is proposed to occur over a period of approximately five years as land becomes available for lhedeveloper. 3 The project location is shown on Figures 1 and 2. The proposed development concept plan and phasing are shown on Figure 3; existing conditions are shown on Figure 4. All existing buildings in the development area will be razed to accommodate the development as the properties become available for purchase by the developer. Street and utility reconstruction will occur in advance of or in conjunction with these phases to accommodate the new buildings. Since the proposed use of the development area is similar in nature to the existing use, grading operations will be limited and should not substantially change drainage patterns or impact natural resources in the area. The existing City utilities in the area will be modified to accommodate the increased density and more intense use of water. Storm drainage features will be added to treat and regulate runoff quality and quantity, respectively. Again, since the new use will not vary substantially from the existing use, there will not be a significant increase in stonn water runoff, but we will have the opportunity to provide quality and quantity regulation where none existed before. c. Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries. The purpose of the project is to revitalize a struggling downtown business district and to add new and affordable housing stock to the City. The City would also like to encourage a pedestrian friendly downtown that invites people to patronize local businesses on foot or by bicycle. d. Are future stages of this development including development on any outlots planned or likely to happen? _Yes X No If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present proj ect, timeline and plans for environmental revie,v. e. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? Yes X No If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review. 7. Project magnitude data Total project acreage 37.41 acres Number of residential units: unattached 0 attached 374 Maximum units per building 72 Commercial, industrial or institlltional building area (gross floor space ):tota1 sq. ft. 63,000 4 llididiteareas. of specific us~s(insqllare feet): Office 31.500 Retail 31.500 Warehouse Q Light industrial Q Other commercial (specify) 0 Building height 20 - 40 feet Manufacturing Q Other industrial Q Institutional Q Agricultural Q If over 2 stories, compare to heights of nearby buildings: Existing buildings within and adjacent to the project area consist primarily of one to two story residential and commercial spaces. St. Genevieve's Church is within the project area and exceeds two stories due to its steeple. Heights of proposed structures would be similar to existing heights and would complement heights of building located adjacent to the project area, including the Centerville Elementary School and the HRA senior housing units. . 8. Permits and approvals required List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure. Unit of Government US Army Corps of Engineers Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Minnesota Pollution Control A enc Minnesota Pollution Control A enc Metropolitan Council Rice Creek Watershed District Rice Creek Watershed District Anoka County Highway De artment Anoka County Highway De artment Anoka ~ounty Highway D artment T e of A lication Section 404 Clean Water Act (impacts to waters in the Corps' 'urisdiction Temporary Water Appropriations Permit National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) Permit/General Stormwater Construction Permit Notice of Termination of Construction Activities Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit Permit to Connect to Regional Sewer S stem Wetland Conservation Act ermit Watershed Permit Permit for work in CSAH 14 ROW Permit for work in CSAH 21 ROW Approval of road reconstruction lans for CSAH 21 5 Status Application to be submitted Application to be submitted, if necessa Application to be submitted Notice to be submitted after construction is com lete Application to be submitted Application to be submitted A lication to be submitted A lication to be submitted Application to be submitted Application to be submitted Plans to be submitted City of Centerville Developer's Agreement Master Agreement is signed. Each phase will require a separate agreement related to the Master. Plans to be submitted Agreement to be develo ed Ci of Centerville City of Centerville A roval of Street and Uti lit Plans Tax Increment Financing Sources of funding that may be utilized by the City for construction of infrastructure related to the project are Community Development Block Grant funds, Minnesota Redevelopment Grant funds, Special Assessments, Public Funds, "429" Bonds. 9. Land use Describe current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adjacent lands. Discuss project compatibility with adjacent and nearby land uses. Indicate whether any potential conflicts involve environmental matters. Identify any potential environmental hazards due to past site uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks, or proximity to nearby hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. The existing land uses within the project area are consistent with an established small- town core downtown. Numerous businesses and single family residential areas are located in the project vicinity (see Figure 4). The proposed conditions are for multiple businesses ( office space) and retail to be located in larger buildings. Multi -family units and townhomes will replace the single family dwellings as they become available for purchase by the developer. Two institutional buildings are located adjacent to the project area. Centerville Elementary School is located to the north. The school building will not be affected, but enhancement of its parking lot within the project boundary is proposed. Two large senior housing buildings operated by Anoka County HRA are located adjacent to the south edge of the project area. The project will have limited effect on the senior housing complex. The Central Anoka County Regional Trail is planned to be located adjacent to CSAH 14 through the project area. Another designated trail, Rice Creek Chain of Lakes- Bald Eagle Regional Trail will run along Centerville Road and connect to the Central Anoka Trail. Potential Contamination A search was conducted ofMPCA on-line records of potential contamination in the City of Centerville to determine the potential for contamination to be encountered during construction of the project. Eight records were found that included one unpermitted dump site, one Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (VIC) site, and six leak sites. The dump site is identified as the Centerville School Absorption Pit (Abandoned) and is located just north of the project area. Because of the close proximity to the proposed redevelopment area, it is possible that contamination from the school site adjacent to the north could migrate to the project site, although it is not anticipated. The VIC site is located east ofInterstate 35E in the City of Lino Lakes, approximately 1.2 miles east of the project area at the closest point. Because of the distance to the VIC site, it is unlikely 6 ., -~. . ',;', " '".0 - <: ,- "- . _: -,- ':";;:: _: :,---' _'--',:- ',' ~ _'-_ _: :-'--, -- _, ' ,'_ -, ," -'.:,' -,,_:, ----'- '_:,--.\:' that contamination present at this property would impact the projecfarea. The following table lists the leak sites as identified on the MPCA Minnesota Aboveground !Underground Storage Tank Site Search web page. Business Address Product Contamination Offsite Site Name released Remaining Contamination Closed *Old PW 1694 Sorel St Gasoline Yes No 1995 Garage Elem. School 1721 Westview Fuel Oil 1 & 2 Unknown Unknown 1996 **Trippels 1801 Main St Gasoline Yes Unknown 1995 Market Rivard 7087 Progress Unknown Unknown No 1999 Electric Rd Rehbien 6805 20th Ave Diesel No No 2006 Companies S. Noble 1724 Main St Fuel Oil 1 & 2 Yes No 1998 Welding * Building tom down in 2006 ** Outside ofproject area It is possible that asbestos and other hazardous materials may be present in the existing structures to be removed for the redevelopment project. Additional investigation will be needed to ensure that demolition of existing structures and disposal of debris is conducted in an appropriate manner in accordance with federal, state and local regulations. IO.Cover types Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development: Before After Before After Types 1-8 wetlands 0.38 ac 0.00 ac Lawn/landscaping 22.87 ac 9.80 ac Wooded/forest 1.32 ac 2.53 ac Impervious Surfaces 12.84 ac 24.67 ac Brush/grassland 0.00 ac 0.00 ac Other (Storm Pond) 0.00 ac 0.41 ac Cropland 0.00 ac 0.00 ac TOTAL 37.41 ac 37.41 ac If Before and After totals are not equal, explain why: Not applicable. In addition, an area at the elementary school north of the redevelopment area is being considered for use as a storm pond. The area is approximately 1 acre in size and is open turf grass. 7 II.Fish, wildlife and ecologically sensitive resources a. Identify fish and wildlife resources and habitats on or near the site and describe how they would be affected by the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid impacts. The project site is located within an area of residential homes, commercial and retail, and roadways. Though it is essentially fully developed, there are a number of water bodies on the edges of the area that provide habitat for fish and other wildlife. Waterbodies include wetlands, Clearwater Creek, and Centerville Lake. Wildlife species likely to be present in the project area include raccoon, rabbit, squirrel, fox, deer, egret, heron, goose, duck and other waterfowl, hawk and other raptors, songbirds and other bird species; small amphibians and reptiles may also be present. Fish species identified in area lakes include walleye, northern pike, black crappie, bullhead, yellow perch, largemouth bass, carp, sunfish, and white sucker. Because of the proximity to Centerville Lake and Clearwater Creek, erosion and sediment control will be important (see EA W Item 16). Best Management Practices will be used during construction of the project and may include silt fence, rock construction entrances, temporary sediment traps, biorolls, riprap, inlet protection, temporary seeding and mulch. b. Are any state-listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, rare plant communities or other sensitive ecological resources such as native prairie habitat, colonial waterbird nesting colonies or regionally rare plant communities on or near the site? _X _Yes No If yes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the project. Indicate if a site survey oCthe resources has been conducted and describe the results. If the DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research program has been contacted give the correspondence reference number: ERDB 20080122. Describe measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. The DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program was recently contacted regarding the potential presence of threatened or endangered species, as well as other rare or sensitive biological resources in the vicinity of the project. The response letter (see Attachment 1) indicated that one threatened species (Blanding's Turtle) was historically identified in 1989 crossing a road south of Centerville. This species is found primarily in shallow wetlands (1-3 feet deep), but nest in open, sandy uplands up to one mile from wetlands. The project area is not within a known state-wide importance priority area, where greater protection is recommended to protect Blanding's Turtles. The DNR has provided recommendations for avoiding and minimizing impacts to this species (see Attachment 1). All of the recommendations applicable to the project and the project area will be implemented except for the recommendation regarding road curbing. 8 , ' . _ _ '_, _. ^' .__ d' _ __ -, " . ... One of the primary goals of the proposed redevelopment project is to create a peciestririn- friendly downtown area. In that regard, barrier style curbs are needed for the roads in the project area to provide for pedestrian safety. 12.Physical impacts on water resources Will the project involve the physical or hydrologic alteration - dredging, filling, stream diversion, outfall structure, diking, and impoundment - of any surface waters such as a lake, pond, wetland, stream or drainage ditch? lYes _No If yes, identify water resource affected and give the DNR Public Waters Inventory number(s) ifthe water resources affected are on the PWI: None. Describe alternatives considered and proposed mitigation measures to minimize impacts. A wetland determination study was completed for the redevelopment area. One wetland was found to be present near the eastern boundary of the project area, generally south of the Sorel Street alignment (see Figure 5). The actual road does not extend to the wetland area. Current plans for the redevelopment project show a storm water treatment pond in the location of the wetland. The developer will need to work with the Rice Creek Watershed District to determine if this use of the wetland is acceptable. Ifnot, the developer will be required to find a new location for the storm pond or design a two-cell treatment system where stormwater receives primary treatment in the first cell and then discharges to the wetland for secondary treatment. The wetland will be delineated in the future. Any impacts to the wetland will be subject to the Wetland Conservation Act Replacement requirement of2:1 mitigation. While no direct impacts as listed above are proposed, there are public waters adjacent to or partially within the site which warrant discussion. Centerville Lake (2-6P) is a 455- acre lake located on the west side ofthe project area. Clearwater Creek (aka Anoka/Washington County Judicial Ditch 3) flows from the east toward the project area and then turns north and crosses through the northeast comer of the project area (Figure 5). The creek is planned to be realigned in this section starting in 2007 as part of the CSAH 14 reconstruction project by Anoka County. The CSAH 14 project and associated creek realignment was not initiated by the proposed redevelopment. Direct impacts to Centerville Lake or Clearwater Creek are not proposed by the downtown redevelopment project. 13.Water use Will the project involve installation or abandonment of any water wells, connection to or changes in any public water supply or appropriation of any ground or surface .. water (including dewatering)? X Yes --=- No If yes, as applicable, give location and purpose of any new wells; public supply affected, changes to be made, and water quantities to be used; the source, duration, quantity and purpose of any appropriations; and unique well numbers-and DNR 9 appropriation permit numbers, if known. Identify any existing and new wells on the site map. If there are no wells known on site, explain methodology used to determine. The project will require connection to a public water supply and installation of new 12- inch water main along Main Street and individual water connections. The city's water supply, storage and distribution system has been designed to accommodate projected growth within the City as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. As the City develops and redevelops, additional water supply wells will be necessary. Due to the shallow depth of groundwater in some areas, dewatering may be necessary in some areas during construction. A temporary water appropriations permit will be obtained form the DNR ifvolumes to be dewatered are such that a pennit is required. A search through the records of the County Well Index (CWI) indicated that there are 25 known wells located within the project area. All of these wells are domestic use (residential) wells. None of the identified wells appear to pump large enough quantities of water as to require a DNR appropriations pennit. The majority of the wells are completed in the drift aquifer and are less than 100 feet in depth. Three bedrock -aquifer wells are completed at depths ranging from 92-106 feet. The following table summarizes information known about the wells identified within the project area: Unique Owner Address Depth Aquifer Use Number (feet) 126886 Floyd Lamotte 1695 Main Street 69 Drift Domestic 142031 Paul Houle 7124 Centerville Road 72 Drift Domestic i5434i Ron Van Kieek 7060 Goiffon Street 65 Drift Domestic 155862 Mickey Peloquin 7084 Centerville Road 78 Drift Domestic 155889 Joe Lacasse 7072 Centerville Road 72 Drift Domestic 163273 Richard Carpenter 7095 Centerville Road 79 Drift Domestic 169296 Randy Zarbock 1745 Heritage Street 66 Drift Domestic 176066 AI Augustine 7064 Centerville Road 65 Drift Domestic 176073 Harold Rivard 7046 Centerville Road 68 Drift Domestic 182913 Charles Underwood 7128 Progress Road 65 Drift Domestic 194483 Helen Turcotte 7073 Centerville Road 66 Drift Domestic 431482 Paul Anderson 7082 Progress Road 75 Drift Domestic 439185 John Mishler 1740 Heritage Street 71 Drift Domestic 439246 Jim Manning 1680 Sorel Street 92 S1. Peter Domestic 460032 Bjergo Construction 7086 Progress Road 75 Drift Domestic 509563 Trio Inn 7082 Centerville Road 100 St. Peter Domestic 509649 Chauncey Barett 7024 Centerville Road 100 Prairie du Chien Domestic 531590 Dean Jemeii 1749 HeriTage StreeT 80 Drift Domestic 548749 Ralph Joe Wanless 7046 Goiffon Road 64 Drift Domestic 554336 Tim Strong 7096 Progress Street 68 Drift Domestic 554370 Kelly's Korner Bar 7098 Centerville Road 106 Prairie du Chien Domestic 554859 Timberlane Homes 1680 Heritage Street 80 Drift Domestic 10 Since the CWI database only contains wells where information has been recorded and cataloged, it is possible that other wells exist within the project area. Ifwells exist in the project area, but are not recorded in CWI, it is likely that these wells are older than 1974. Also, there is a possibility that wells exist in the project area that are abandoned, but not yet properly sealed. If wells of this nature are discovered, these wells must be properly sealed according to Minnesota Well Code. I4.Water-related land use management district Does any part ofthe project involve a shoreland zoning district, a delineated 100- year flood plain, or a state or federally designated wild or scenic river land use district? l Yes No If yes, identify the district and discuss project compatibility with district land use restrictions. Portions of the project extend within the City-designated lOa-foot shoreland buffer zones for Centerville Lake and Clearwater Creek (see Figure 6), as identified in the City Comprehensive Plan (1997). The redevelopment project will be required to comply with the City's ordinance pertaining to development within 100 feet of the waterbodies. The 1997 Comprehensive Plan indicates Centerville Lake and Clearwater Creek have floodplains designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (see Figure 7). The proposed project will be required to comply with all applicable floodplain regulations. I5.Water surface use Will the project change the number or type of watercraft on any water body? Yes lNo If yes, indicate the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or conflicts with other uses. A few townhomes in the redevelopment area may have access to the lake, however, no new public access will be provided to the lake as part of the redevelopment. I6.Erosion and sedimentation Give the acreage to be graded or excavated and the cubic yards of soil to be moved: 26 acres; 180,000 cubic yards. Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible soils and identify them on the site map. 11 Describe any erosion and sedimentation control measures to be used during and after project construction. The majority of soil types within the project area do not represent steep slopes or highly erodible soils. There is one area in the north part of the project site where an eroded soil type is identified: HdC2 - Hayden fine sandy loam, 6-12% slopes, eroded. Soils on steep slopes are designated with a "D" or an "E" in their mapping symbol and generally have slopes greater than 12%. Soils on slopes greater than 12% are not identified at the project site. The locations of the soil types are shown on Figure 8. Because construction of the project will disturb more than one acre ofland, an application for a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities will be submitted to the MPCA. This permit requires the applicant to develop a Stonnwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) which includes both temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control plans; the NPDES permit also requires the applicant to perform inspections and maintain inspection records. Erosion control measures to be used during construction are expected to include rock construction entrances, silt fence, rock ditch checks, temporary sediment traps, biorolls, riprap, inlet protection, temporary seeding and mulch. Initially, these erosion control devices will be placed at the downstream end of the construction limits; the devices will be installed prior to the start of any land disturbing activity. Additional devices as noted on the construction drawings may be added as construction progresses. The devices will be maintained as directed under permit requirements to maintain their effectiveness. Maintenance will be the responsibility of the Contractor. Within the timeframes stipulated in approved plans, graded areas will be paved, seeded and mulched, or covered with fiber blankets, stabilization mats, or sod. Erosion control devices will remain in place until site stabilization has been achieved and vegetation has been reestablished. Permanent strategies to control erosion and manage stonnwater are discussed in Item 17 and will include the use of constructed ponds and stormwater infiltration areas (such as raingardens) where the water can infiltrate. 17. Water quality: surface water runoff a. Compare the quantity and quality of site runoff before and after the project. Describe permanent controls to manage or treat runoff. Describe any stormwater pollution prevention plans. l\S this is a redevelopment project, the existing site is primarily dev~loped "vvith a mix of residential and commercial land uses. Construction of the medium and high density residential and mixed use commercial sites will increase the impervious surfaces and therefore stormwater runoff will increase. Proposed stormwater management measures will be designed to meet the City of Centerville, Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) 12 ~. " "t' , " "'. .,:.: ,: ::"-, ' '''';. ..:.,.." '::' " : '. " .', ' .' "'... . "-'';:;'aridMinnesota Pollution Control Agency National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (MPCA NPDES) General Construction Permit requirements. The most stringent of these requirements in terms of stormwater management is RCWD. Compliance with these requirements will meet or exceed the requirements of the City and NPDES. The stormwater management features for the site will be designed to meet RCWD's proposed new rules, dated June 13, 2007. Some highlights from these rules are: . Water quality and infiltration best management practices (BMPs) designed to infiltrate and/or retain the runoff volume from the two-year (2.8 inch) storm event. . For existing impervious surfaces that will remain after the redevelopment, the treatment requirement is to provide infiltration volume adequate for the 0.8-inch event. · Proposed discharge rates must be less than or equal to pre-development discharge rates. Therefore pre-developed conditions were assumed for the downtown area with a curve number associated with wooded/grass areas. The BMPs provided to meet the above RCWD requirements will include a combination of several features - rain gardens, depressed parking lot islands, pervious pavement with underground storage, pretreatment and infiltration basins. The BMPs will be designed to drawdown within 48 hours as required by the RCWD rules and the NPDES requirements. As discussed above, the project will require an NPDES permit because it will disturb more than one acre of land. The NPDES permit requires the preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) which includes both temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control plans and stormwater management measures. The proposed project will comply with NPDES requirements. The entity responsible for ensuring compliance will be specified in the permit. Both Centerville Lake and Clearwater Creek are listed as impaired waterbodies by the MPCA - a waterbody that does not meet water quality standards and designated uses because of "pollutant( s), pollution, or unknown causes of impairment". Clearwater Creek is impaired for fish and invertebrate index of biotic integrity and Centerville Lake is impaired for nutrients. RCWD is in the process of completing a TMDL study for Centerville Lake. With the use of the proposed stormwater management strategies and implementation of Best Management Practices erosion and sediment control measures, the project is not expected to worsen the lake or creek's impairment condition. Centerville Lake is listed as a priority lake by the Metropolitan Council. Lakes designated as priority lakes generally require a nutrient budget analysis to determine if the project will have an adverse ~ffecton thela,ke's water quality. A nutrient budget analysis was not completed for several reasons: 1. The existing downtown project area WaS constructed prior to requirements for water quality treatment prior to discharge to Centerville Lake. The proposed 13 project area will be designed with water quality features to meet the requirements listed above. This results in a significant improvement in the water quality of the runoff discharged from the site. Runoffvolumes, total phosphorus and total suspended sediments will all be less than existing, even with the increase in impervious surface. 2. The drainage area to Centerville Lake will decrease from existing conditions. 3. The project area draining to Centerville Lake is considerably smaller than the entire drainage area to Centerville Lake. b. Identify routes and receiving water bodies for runofffrom the site; include major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters. Estimate impact runoff on the quality of receiving waters. Runoff from the site, after treatment in the several infiltration basins and other stormwater best management practices, is routed via storm sewer to either Centerville Lake or Clearwater Creek. The majority of the site is tributary to Clearwater Creek which travels roughly 4,400 feet before discharging downstream to Peltier Lake. With the stormwater management strategies to be implemented for the project, it is not expected to impact the quality of receiving waters. I8.Water quality: wastewaters a. Describe sources, composition and quantities of all sanitary, municipal and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. Sanitary sewer wastewater will be produced from a few sources. The first would be municipal wastewater from the townhomes and condos. This waste will be typical of any residential development. The second would be municipal wastewater from retail and office space as proposed on the first floor of some of the downtown buildings. Again, this wastewater will be typical of any office building. The third source would be from any restaurant that may occupy some of the available retail space. Their wastewater may be higher in organic composition including fats and oils. Estimated quantities are listed below: Residential 65,000 gallons per day (gpd) (average) Office/Retail 11,000 gpd (average) Restaurants 44,000 gpd (average) Total = 120,000 gpd (average) b. Describe waste treatment methods or pollution prevention efforts and give estimates of composition after treatment. Identify receiving waters, including major downstream water bodies, and estimate the discharge impact on the quality of receiving waters. If the project involves on-site sewage systems, discuss the suitability of site conditions for such systems. 14 Al{~i~t~~ater prod~ced by the proposed redevelopment project will be treated at the Metropolitan Council's Metro Wastewater Treatment Facility. c. If wastes will be discharged into a publicly owned treatment facility, identify the facility, describe any pretreatment provisions and discuss the facility's ability to handle the volume and composition of wastes, identifying any improvements necessary. All wastewater produced by the proposed redevelopment project will be treated at the Metropolitan Council's Metro Wastewater Treatment Facility. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) will issue permits assuring that their facilities are able to handle the wastewater. Restaurants may be required to install grease traps or other such pretreatment devices on their wastewater discharge lines to prevent maintenance issues in City owned sanitary sewer pipes and lift stations. d. If the project requires disposal of liquid animal manure, describe disposal technique and location and discuss capacity to handle the volume and composition of manure. Identify any improvements necessary. Describe any required setbacks for land disposal systems. Not applicable. 19. Geologic hazards and soil conditions a. Approximate depth (in feet) to ground water: 5 ft bg minimum 15 ft bg average to bedrock: ~60 ft bg minimum ~80 ft bg average Describe any of the following geologic site hazards to ground water and also identify them on the site map: sinkholes, shallow limestone formations or karst conditions. Describe measures to avoid or minimize environmental problems due to any of these hazards. Depth-to-water and depth-to-bedrock information was obtained from well records found in the County Well Index database. According to the Surficial Geology Map of the Anoka 30x60 Quadrangle (Meyer and Patterson, Minnesota Geological Survey,1999), the project site lies primarily in an area overlain by loamy till, chiefly comprised of loamy textured soil with unsorted sediments, pebbles, cobbles, or boulders. A symbol on the surficial geology map indicates the site . has been intersected in the past by deep, broad troughs cut by meltwatersof the Superior lobe glacier. These features are evidenced by local chains of lakes, including Centerville Lake and Peltier Lake. 15 According to the Bedrock Geology and Stmcture Map of the Seven-County Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (MossIer and Tipping, Minnesota Geologic Survey, 2000) for the project area, the uppermost bedrock units with the project area are the St. Peter Sandstone over much of the project area, with the Prairie du Chien Dolomite present as the first bedrock unit over the northern and western edges of the project area. The Prairie du Chien is present over the entire project area, but is overlain by the St. Peter over much of the proj ect. Where the Prairie du Chien is present as the first bedrock unit, it is generally found at the depth between 50-100 feet, classifying the area as being a "transition karst" area, as opposed to an "active karst" area where depth to carbonate bedrock is less than 50 feet deep. In general, areas of transition karst do not typically experience hazards such as sinkholes unless changes are made to local topography to reduce depth-to-bedrock. However, a minor risk for karst features developing in the project area does exist simply due to the nature and depth of the bedrock in the area. b. Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications, if known. Discuss soil granularity and potential for groundwater contamination from wastes or chemicals spread or spilled onto the soils. Discuss any mitigation measures to prevent such contamination. According to Anoka County soils information, the soil types listed in the following table are identified in the project area. Their locations are depicted on Figure 8. Soil Types Symbol I Soil Name Special Hvdroloe:ic I I - ~ Significance * I Soil Group** Af Alluvial land, mixed, I Hydric D frequently flooded Bm Blomford loamy fine Hydric BID sand Cu Cut and fill land -- -- ---- Du Dundas loam Hydric, prime BID fannland if drained HdB Hayden fine sandy Prime farmland B loam, 2-6% slopes HdC2 Hayden fine sandy Farmland of B loam, 6-12% slopes, statewide eroded importance NcA I N cssel fine sandy loam, Prime farlnlaild D D _J 1-4% slopes Wb Webster loam Hydric, prime BID farmland if drained 16 'Ii'> \.-.-~- , * Hydric soils, prime farmland soils and other important farmland soils were identified using the USDA NRCS online Soil Data Mart tool for Anoka County, Minnesota. Prime farmland, as defined by the USDA, is land that has the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics for producing food, feed, forage, fiber, and oilseed crops and is available for use in these areas. The designation is not meant to include land that is urban or built up. Soils designated as farmland of statewide importance are not considered prime but are still considered of value for agricultural use. **The hydrologic soil group refers to soils grouped according to their runoff-producing characteristics. The chief consideration is the inherent capacity of the soil bare of vegetation to permit infiltration. The slope and kind of plant cover are not considered but are separate factors in predicting runoff. Soils are assigned to four groups. In Group A are soils having a high infiltration rate when thoroughly wet and having a low runoff potential. They are mainly deep, well drained, and sandy or gravelly. In Group D, at the other extreme are soils having a slow infiltration rate and thus a high runoff potential. They have a clay pan or clay layer at or near the surface, have a permanent high water table, or are shallow over nearly impervious bedrock or other material. A soil is assigned to two hydrologic groups if part of the acreage is artificially drained and part is undrained In general, water moves through coarse textured soils at a faster rate than through medium or fme textured soils. Therefore, potential impacts to ground water from spilled chemicals would be expected to be greater in areas with coarse textured soils. However, many factors in addition to soil granularity can affect infiltration and percolation rates in . soils. . Some of-these factors include: soil water content, soil frost, the temperature of soil and water, surface roughness, the nature of the soil pore openings, vegetative ground cover, and the degree of soil compaction. Although chemical substances may be transported over the roadways in the project area, their use or storage on a permanent basis is not associated with the proposed project, other than in small quantities typical of residential, retail, and office use. 20.Solid wastes, hazardous wastes, storage tanks a. Describe types, amounts and compositions of solid or hazardous wastes, including solid animal manure, sludge and ash, produced during construction and operation. Identify method and location of disposal. For projects generating municipal solid waste, indicate if there is a source separation plan; describe how the project will be modified for recycling. If hazardous waste is generated, indicate if there is a hazardous waste minimization plan and routine hazardous waste reduction assessments. Demolition of existing structures to allow for redevelopment will generate waste materials. In addition to typical construction materials, it is possible that asbestos and other hazardous materials may be present in the structures to be demolished. Additional investigation will be needed to ensure that demolition of buildings and disposal of materials/debris is conducted in an appropriate manner in accordance with federal, state and local regulations. Construction activities will also generate solid waste materials. Materials will likely include waste concrete and asphalt, as well as other materials used in construction. It will also include organic debris such as shrubs and plant materials. Specific volumes of general waste materials to be generated are not known at this time. .W aste. materials will be recycled or disposed of in accordance with applicable local, state, and federal law. After the redevelopment, solid waste from the area will be similar to c.urren! cOl!gj!~ons and will consist of typical household, commercial retail and office wastes. Wastes will 17 be collected by a licensed solid waste handler in accordance with City ordinances. Recycling will be encouraged and will also be collected as is typical in the city of Centerville. Hazardous waste is not expected to be generated by the development. b. Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present at the site and identify measures to be used to prevent them from contaminating groundwater. If the use of toxic or hazardous materials will lead to a regulated waste, discharge or emission, discuss any alternatives considered to minimize or eliminate the waste, discharge or emission. During construction, equipment and vehicles utilizing gasoline, diesel fuel, antifreeze, and oil will be used at the project site. Portable storage tanles of fuel may be temporarily located at the site during construction. Fueling of vehicles and equipment will be conducted away from sensitive areas. If an accidental release occurs, efforts will be made to contain the release and the MPCA State Duty officer will be notified, as required. c. Indicate the number, location, size and use of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum products or other materials, except water. Describe any emergency response containment plans. As discussed above, portable storage tanks of fuel may be temporarily located at the site during construction. Permanent above or below ground storage tanles will not be installed as part of the proposed project. 21. Traffic Parking spaces added see below. Existing spaces (if project involves expansion) see below. Estimated total average daily traffic generated 3.530 trips. Estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated (if known) and time of occurrence 171 pm trips entering the redevelopment area. Provide an estimate of the impact on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. If the project is within the Twin Cities metropolitan area, discuss its impaet on the regional transportation system. Parking Cunently there are approximately 100 parking spaces in the downtown area. This estimate includes approximately 50 spaces comprised of on street parking and small off street parking lots as well as approximately 50 spaces for the Centerville Elementmy School. The school itself is located north of and adjacent to the redevelopment area, but its primary parking lot lies within the redevelopment area. Per City Code Section 154.170, required parking for the proposed redevelopment consists of748 spaces for the residential portion of the redevelopment (2 spaces/unit per City minimum requirements) and 378 spaces for the retail portion of the redevelopment (6 18 '. .. "'-. . .. - - . . . ~pa.besper 1000 sqft). The 50 school parking spaces will also be replaced. It is likely that 350-400 of the residential parking spaces will be constructed underground in lower level parking below buildings. Based on the parking requirements, a total of 1176 spaces would be constructed, which adds 1076 new spaces over existing conditions. It should be noted that in the M-1 Mixed Use zoning district, within which the project site is located, City Code allows the City Council to modify the minimum parking requirements as part of the site plan approval process. Traffic The proposed redevelopment project will increase the traffic volumes on roadways within the City. A traffic impact analysis of the proposed redevelopment scenario has been conducted in order to identify whether roadway and/or other transportation improvements will need to be undertaken. The analysis, provided in Attachment 2, attempts to identify the traffic related impacts of the redevelopment project. Identified impacts are then evaluated to determine what mitigation efforts need to be enacted so that transportation service can be provided at an acceptable level. The project area is shown in Figure 21-1 of the analysis in Attachment 2. The roadways and intersections analyzed in the study were determined in conjunction with City of Centerville staff. The following intersections were examined as a part of this review: . Main Street & 20th Avenue . Main Street & Dupre Road · Main Street & Progress Road · Main Street & Centerville Road · Centerville Road & Sorel Street · Centerville Road & Heritage Street These intersections were analyzed for traffic volumes and approach geometry, both existing and proposed. The traffic analysis concluded that the proposed development will add vehicular trips to the roadway. It is currently planned to upgrade the Main Street corridor beginning in September 2007 and completing in July 2009. The system was analyzed for the year 2012, which accounted for both completion of the proposed development, and the improvements to the Main Street corridor. Based on that analysis, it was determined that the improvements being made to the Main Street corridor will adequately accommodate the expected increase in traffic volumes due to the proposed development for 2012 volumes. The roadway network was analyzed again to reflect 20 years of growth in the area to year 2030. The traffic volumes were increased by the current county state-aid growth factor, as presented by MnDOT. The analysis determined that the planned improvements to the 19 Main Street corridor will provide overall satisfactory LOS results. Some individual movements at two intersections are expected to operate at LOS E or F. However, no additional mitigation is proposed because: · Relatively few vehicles are expected for those movements · A traffic signal at the Progress Road and Dupre Road intersections would not be warranted · Lower LOS results for side-street stop controlled movements are not uncommon · Progress Road traffic has the option of shifting to the signalized intersection at Main Street and Centerville Road Although overall satisfactory LOS are expected to be provided, safety improvements to the Main Street corridor are recommended. These improvements will retain the flexibility for different left turn phasing, allowing the signal to adapt to changing traffic flows and patterns. The changes will also improve the LOS for some individual movements. The alternative improvements recommended include: · Providing an exclusive northbound left turn lane at the intersection of Main Street and Centerville Road instead of an exclusive right turn lane · Adding a southbound left turn lane at the intersection of Main Street and Centerville Road · Adding a southbound right turn lane at the intersection of Main Street and Progress Road The results and recommendations for 2030 are similar with or without the proposed development. The exact timing for a traffic signal at the intersection of Main Street and Centerville Road will depend upon actual traffic conditions. The intersection and its volumes should be monitored to detennine the appropriate timing of installation and ensuring that a traffic signal system is wananted and j usti tied. 22. Vehicle-related air emissions Estimate the effect of the project's traffic generation on air quality, including carbon monoxide levels. Discuss the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on air quality impacts. Note: If the project involves 500 or more parking spaces, consult EA W Guidelines about whether a detailed air quality analysis is needed. According to the air quality impact analysis completed by SBP Associates, Inc. (see AttachmentJ), carbon monoxide (CO) levels are elevated near roadway intersections due to the emission of this pollutant from the vehicles idling and passing by the redevelopment area. The State of Minnesota has ambient CO standards that are designed to protect human health and the environment. The Standards are: 20 . I-hour average: 30 parts per million (ppm); and · 8-hour average: 9 ppm. Concentrations near or above these levels are most likely to occur near intersections that . have heavy traffic volumes and are severely congested. With the proposed area roadway . improvements, severe congestion problems that could cause air quality problems are not expected to develop at the major intersections near the project. 23.Stationary source air emissions Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources of air emissions such as boilers, exhaust stacks or fugitive dust sources. Include any hazardous air pollutants (consult EA W Guidelines for a listing) and any greenhouse gases (such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide) and ozone-depleting chemicals (chloro-fluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons or sulfur hexafluoride). Also describe any proposed pollution prevention techniques and proposed air pollution control devices. Describe the impacts on air quality. Emissions from structures proposed at the site are not expected to be significant. 24.0dors, noise and dust Will the project generate odors, noise or dust during construction or during operation? lYes _No If yes, describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities or intensity and any proposed measures to mitigate adverse impacts. Also identify locations of nearby sensitive receptors and estimate impacts on them. Discuss potential impacts on human health or quality of life. (Note: fugitive dust generated by operations may be discussed at item 23 instead of here.) Dust and noise will be generated by equipment and machinery during construction. Odors may also be generated from construction equipment exhaust. Equipment will include trucks, backhoes, graders, compactors, excavators, bobcats, cranes, loaders, compressors, and possibly de-watering pumps. Dust may be controlled by daily cleanup of the construction site; water will be used to wet appropriate surfaces to reduce airborne dust when necessary. Noise and odor impacts from construction equipment will be controlled by ensuring the equipment is properly muffled and in good working condition, and by restricting the hours of operation to daylight hours, or those permitted by local ordinances. The project proceeds through residential neighborhoods and is adjacent to numerous residential yards. Construction ofthe project is anticipated to occur in phases over a five- year period. Phases of construction in anyone area are expected to be completed over one construction season, approximately seven months (May through November). 21 SBP Noise Impact Analysis SBP Associates, Inc. (SBP) conducted a traffic noise monitoring and modeling analysis for the proposed downtown redevelopment; the report is provided in Attachment 3. The modeling analysis used the MNDOT Minnoise computer model and traffic predictions prepared by Bonestroo. Additionally, SBP conducted noise monitoring at two locations near the project site. Predicted Daytime Noise Level Discussion The results indicate that the modeled residential building receptor locations are predicted to have noise levels within the State standard for the year 2012. Locations R3 and R6 (shown on Figure 1 of the noise analysis in Attachment 3) are at or above the standards with 2030 traffic volumes. This indicates that there would be some speech interference from the traffic noise for persons outside on the street side of these buildings during 2030 peak traffic periods. The predicted noise level changes between the existing and year 2012 result from additional traffic generated by the development and by other area growth. The noise level increase for this period is predicted to be 3 dBA or less at all modeled receptor locations. The MPCA considers changes of 3 dBA or less to be imperceptible. Predicted Nighttime Noise Level Discussion Table 2 of the noise analysis (provided in Attachment 3) indicates that all modeled residential receptor locations, except location R7, would have nighttime traffic noise levels above the Minnesota standard for modeled years 2012 and 2030. This standard is based on sleep interference for people sleeping in bedrooms with partially open windows. Residences in these areas should have year-round climate control and should be constmcted to achieve an outdoor-to-indoor noise level reduction of 30 dBA. 25.Nearby resources Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site? Archaeological, historical or architectural resources? _X_Yes _No Prime or unique farmlands or land within an agricultural preserve? _X_Yes No Designated parks, recreation areas or trails? _X_Yes No Scenic views and vistas? Yes _X_No Other unique resources? _Yes _X_No If yes, describe the resource and identify any project-related impacts on the resource. Describe any measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. a) Archaeol02ical, Historical, or Architectural resources The Minnesota Historical Society State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was contacted regarding the presence of documented cultural resource sites within the project area. According to the response received (see Attachment 4) numerous sites were 22 identified and many appear to be located within the downtown red~velopment area. The City obtained a copy of the cultural resources survey that was completed by The 106 Group in the area for the proposed Anoka County CSAH 14 Reconstruction Project. The survey examined 39 properties in SHPO's inventory records - the same 39 properties that were listed in the SHPO response received for the downtown redevelopment project. The survey concluded that none of the properties are eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. b) Prime or Uniaue Farmlands According to Anoka County soils information, two soils in the project area are identified as prime farmland: Hayden fme sandy loam, 2-6% slopes and Nessel fme sandy loam, 1- 4% slopes. Two other soils are classified as prime farmland if drained: Dundas loam and Webster loam. In addition, one soil is classified as farmland of statewide importance: Hayden fine sandy loam, 6-12% slopes, eroded. Figure 8 shows "the locations of the soils. Although a number of the soils in the project area are identified as important to farming, iand within the project corridor is not used agriculturally. Most was developed long ago as residential or commercial property. c) Desienated Parks. Recreation Areas. or Trails There are no designated parks or recreation areas within the project area. However, Centerville Lake is adjacent to the project area and offers numerous recreational opportunities including boating, fishing, and swimming. A number of City parks are located within the vicinity of the project area and offer open spaces for recreation and picnicking. The largest of these, Laurie LaMotte Park, is located just to the south of the project area and offers primary facilities for organized recreation activities, including a hockey rink, a skating rink, soccer fields, softball diamonds, and park buildings. Additionally, Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve is also within the vicinity of the project area. The Central Anoka County Regional Trail is planned to be located adjacent to CSAH 14 through the project area. Another designated trail, Rice Creek Chain of Lakes - Bald Eagle Regional Trail will run along Centerville Road and connect to the Central Anoka Trail. Park and trail users may experience minor impacts of odors, noise and dust during construction of the project. These impacts would be short term and are not expected to be significant. Measures discussed elsewhere (such as in Items 16 and 24) will minimize impacts. d) Scenic Views and Vistas There are no views or vistas officially designated as scenic in the project area. However, views of and from Centerville Lake can be considered scenic. Several townhome units are proposed in the northwest part of the project area on the shore ofCenterville Lake where no structures are located currently, thus there will be a change in the views from and of the lake in this area. Overall, significantly adverse impacts to views are not expected because the proposed project is a redevelopment of an existing developed area. See item 26 for additional discussion regarding visual impacts. 23 e) Other Unique Resources Every summer Centerville celebrates the Festival of Lakes (Fete de Lacs) which includes a parade, fireworks, food, and entertainment. The parade proceeds through the downtown area and the festival itself is held in a park to the southwest of the redevelopment area. The parade route may need to be altered due to the redevelopment project but other impacts are not expected. 26.Visual impacts Will the project create adverse visual impacts during construction or operation? Such as glare from intense lights, lights visible in wilderness areas and large visible plumes from cooling towers or exhaust stacks? _X_Yes _No If yes, explain. While the project will cause none of the impacts listed above, it will result in a visual change to the shoreline of Centerville Lake where townhome units are proposed to be constructed. Overall building heights will increase compared to CUlTent conditions, but heights will be similar to the buildings that cUlTently are located within the study area. Additional lighting as well as different types of lighting then presently used will result from the addition of commercial spaces and residential units. Trees may need to be removed for construction of commercial and residential spaces. Tree replacement is planned, but will not necessarily be completed in the exact location of tree removal. Instead, trees will be planted along boulevards and in locations that enhance overall aesthetics. 27. Compatibility with plans and land use regulations Is the project subject to an adopted local comprehensive plan, land use plan or regulation, or other applicable land use, water, or resource management plan of a local, regional, state or federal agency? _X_Yes _No. If yes, describe the plan, discuss its compatibility with the project and explain how any conflicts will be resolved. If no, explain. The project is subject to the City's adopted comprehensive plan including all recent amendments. The proposed development is consistent with the intent of the comprehensive plan as well as the City's downtown master plan. The downtown master plan design meets the Metropolitan Council's vision for developing communities to provide for more development within existing urban areas and provide growth at densities between 3-5+ units per acre. This development will exceed these desired minimums while providing a unique mixed use development that will provide a variety of housing opportunities, commercial and office uses in a traditionally designed downtown. The development will also provide hOLlsing dlOices and opportunities for the city to meet the Metropolitan Council affordable housing allocation over the next several years. 24 """"--""C'~_""__ _-=>~ The project is also subject to and will comply with the Rice Creek Watershed District Watershed Management Plan. 28.Impact on infrastructure and public services Will new or expanded utilities, roads, other infrastructure or public services be required to serve the project? lYes _No. If yes, describe the new or additional infrastructure or services needed. (Note: any infrastructure that is a connected action with respect to the project must be assessed in the EA W; see EA W Guidelines for details.) A new trunk water main, updated storm sewer, and reconstruction of existing streets are proposed as part of this project. Street and utility reconstruction will occur in advance of or in conjunction with construction phases to accommodate the new buildings. The existing City utilities in the area will be modified to accommodate the increased density and more intense use of water. Storm drainage features will be added to treat and regulate runoff quality and quantity, respectively. Again, since the new use will not vary substantially from the existing use, there will not be a significant increase in storm water runoff, but we will have the opportunity to provide quality and quantity regulation where none existed before. 29. Cumulative impacts Minnesota Rule part 4410.1700, subpart 7, item B requires that the RGU consider the "cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects" when determining the need for an environmental impact statement. Identify any past, present or reasonably foreseeable future projects that may interact with the project described in this EA W in such a way as to cause cumulative impacts. Describe the nature of the cumulative impacts and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to cumulative impacts (or discuss each cumulative impact under appropriate item(s) elsewhere on this form). Cumulative impacts are not expected to result from the project, nor is it expected to interact negatively with any existing or future development. Anoka County is currently undertaking the reconstruction ofCSAH 14. This reconstruction was not initiated by the proposed redevelopment. Anoka County State Aid Higway (CSAH) 21 is proposed to be reconstructed in conjunction with the redevelopment of downtown Centerville. The reconstruction will be confined to the redevelopment area. The City, independently or through agreement with the developer, will reconstruct side streets within the study area during this same period. 25 30.0ther potential environmental impacts If the project may cause any adverse environmental impacts not addressed by items 1 to 28, identify and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation. Impacts in addition to those discussed previously in this EA Ware not anticipated. 31.Summary of issues Do not complete this section if the EA W is being done for EIS scoping; instead, address relevant issues in the draft Scoping Decision document, which must accompany the EA W. List any impacts and issues identified above that may require further investigation before the project is begun. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these impacts and issues, including those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions. The project proposer must acquire the previously mentioned permits and approvals prior to proceeding with construction. Temporary and pem1anent erosion and sediment control plans and a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) must be prepared. Issues that will require additional investigation include: · The wetland identified within the redevelopment area must be delineated. The delineation report will need to be submitted for review and approval to the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) as the Local Govemmental Unit (LGU) responsible for administration of the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). Any impacts proposed to the \vetland \vill reqllire prior approval by the P,-C\^lD and l11itigation at a 2: 1 ratio will be required prior to impacting the wetland. · Demolition of existing structures to allow for redevelopment will generate waste materials, some of which may be considered hazardous (such as asbestos containing materials). Additional investigation will be needed to ensure that demolition of buildings and disposal of materials/debris is conducted in an appropriate manner in accordance with federal, state and local regulations. 26 RGU<?EaTJ1fICAl'lQ:lY.TheEnviroJ1h1~nta1QUaJity ]~oardwiU ~#ly~stGNEl) E!nyifQl:1tlleIl~l A~mentWorksbeets fur public notice in the EQB Monitor. . l"erepy~rtifythat: · Th~mr~rm@91i(;()~d ~. this d~em is ~(;(;~e. andCQmplete t()tbe...~()f m~bow~S!... .... ...................... ...... ........ . · rhe~A.\V~~rjJJe$the~l1l~1:t!Pf()j~t;~arenoother ~ec.~. ~dr c~emsth~ 4~n~ ii1thisdge~,,nt, . ... ....~ telette<ltt>the prqJ.. . .... .~.... .~~i~ as.defined at Minnesota Rules, parts 441 b~.~iYely. . · Copies oftbisEAWare being senfrothe entire.EQB distribution list Que o/-z~ tJ 2 Title Signature EnViroomenmlAsse8$lJ1t'Dt Wotk$heet filml was by the $taW qfthe ~~~~I~UtyJ.lp~at the Admin' ent.For additiooalintormatkm, Wt)rk.'beets~rror.~W~lfnes.~ll~H~fiYi.... .... .... ~itya~,<>S8~~Sti..St. ~1,MNS'lS$, 6S1-~96-8:z53, orhttp:fbt~'\\i.eq~.st~'IDfl.U~ 27 See Web site for Attachments & Exhibits CITY OF C.ENTERYILLE CITY COtJNCIL.WORKSESSION Octo6er 24, 2007 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their work session meeting on October 24,2007, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Mayor Mary Capra .... Council Member Tom Lee (left at 9:45 p.m.) ed ~::::::::::~;::O:~;d Not APpfO,ep; ABSENT: STAFF: City Administrator Dallas Larson City Attorney Kurt Glaser City Engineer Mark Statz Public Works Director Paul Palzer Finance Director John Meyer I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Capra convened the October 24, 2007, City Council Work Session at 6:00 p.m. II. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 1. Mr. Darrin Mosher Request for Appointment to Planning & Zoning Commission and Resignation from Parks & Recreation Committee Council briefly interviewed Planning & Zoning Commission candidate Mr. Darrin Mosher. Mr. Mosher stated that he had applied for a previous Planning & Zoning vacancy approximately one year ago and at that time, Council appointed him to the Parks & Recreation Committee. Mr. Mosher stated that with several vacancies at this time, he would like to be reconsidered for a Planning & Zoning Commission vacancy and resign from the Parks & Recreation Committee. Mr. Mosher stated that he felt that he had served the City well on the Parks & Recreation Committee; however his true desire was to serve the community on Planning and Zoning where he felt he was more qualified. Council thanked Mr. Mosher for the opportunity to meet with him, consider his qualifications and his commitment to the community. . III. CONVENE TO REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Mayor Capra convened to the regularly schedule Council meeting at 6:30 p.m. ../7 ~ City of Centerville Council Work Session Meeting Minutes October 24, 2007 Transcribed by: Dallas Larson, Administrator Page 2 of2 o .:J.' ,~.~.'~....... .... ~'... ........ ......~...-.-..~.-.-......_., .~.-.:.. -- --- - ,-- ~. -' - ------- ----......;;.....-:"'_._~ ~ .~E~.!,~RYILLE .' ~IL~TING ~ctober 24, 2007 6:30 p.m. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on October 24,2007, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: ~fg:gk:~~o~~ ~t ~,~2~1~.)mlil~ l~!!!r~",d 1\1'.'...."."'... .......,.... O.D.........,... t... A.'m........... '..mm. p... U',. n. ... .... n. ........... ". n. .. ..... n. ,_, ... n. ...... .... ..... ... ...... n. ." ... n. .... ". ". .. ".n... _m ,_, on....... ..... .......... .... ..... n_ ." ... ... ... .... ". .. ....... n_ .__ ..... ... ... ". H' C '1 M b J if P .",.'.,..., ...,.. ..' ,.... ,...,. ...... ..,... .,... ounCl em er e aar ,. .'.. ;;' ,', ...... , ... ....-. ..-. ". .... ... ..... ........ .. ... ...... ....... ..... ....... ...."..., ... ..... ..... 0.. .... '_P' ... ..... . City Administrator Dallas Larson City Attorney Kurt Glaser City Engineer Mark Statz ABSENT: STAFF: I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Capra called the October 24,2007, City Council meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Capra added Item 1 page 8a and Item 5 to the Consent Agenda. Mayor Capra added Items 5 and 6 to New Business. Motion by Council Member Lakso. seconded by Council Member Broussard to approve the ae:enda as amended. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. IV. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES 1. October 10. 2007 City Council Meeting Minutes Motion by Council Member Lakso. seconded by Council Member Broussard to approve the October 10. 2007 City Council Meetine: Minutes as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 1 City of CenterviIle Council Meeting Minutes October 24, 2007 Council Member Lee arrived at 6:32 p.m. v. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City of Centerville October 11. 2007 through October 24. 2007 Claims 2. Centennial Fire District Claims through October 15. 2007 3. Centennial Lakes Police Department Claims through October 12.2007 4. Sponsor Red Cross Training at St. Genevieve's Parish Community Center November 3. 2007 Motion by Council Member Lakso. seconded bv Council Member Broussard to approve the Consent Ae:enda as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. VI. A W ARDS/PRESENTATIONS/APPEARANCES None VII. OLD BUSINESS None VIII. NEW BUSINESS 1. ABDO. Eick & Meyers LLP - Audit Engagement Letter of 2007 City Administrator Larson stated that this is the time of year to schedule a year-end audit so work could begin in December 2007. Mayor Capra questioned whether the fees for service higher than last year at $27,000. City Administrator Larson stated that new audit standards drove the cost up about $3,000. Motion by Council Member Lakso. seconded bv Council Member Broussard. to approve the ABDO. Eick & Meyers LLP Audit Ene:ae:ement Letter of 2007. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Central Anoka County Regional Trail East Alignment Master Plan a. Resolution #07-038 - Supporting the Development and Construction of the East Alignment of the Central Anoka County Regional Trail Corridor. City Attorney Glaser commented that he reviewed and approves this resolution. Motion by Council Member Lakso. seconded by Council Member Lee to approve Resolution #07-038. a Resolution Supportine: the Development and Construction of Page 2 of5 .j City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes October 24, 2007 the East Albro-ment of the Central Anoka County Resrlonal Trail Corridor. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Request to Extend Completion Date on Public Works Building to December 27, 2007 City Administrator Larson reported that the building is being remodeled to the specifications of City Council and the developer requests an extension to compete the project as the recent rains caused delays. Motion by Council Member Lee. seconded by Council Member Broussard. to approve the Request to Extend Completion Date on Public Works Buildine: to December 27.2007. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Resolution #07-039 - Rescheduling the $2,600,000 G.O. Improvement Bond, Series 2007 A Bid Opening Date City Administrator Larson reported that Resolution would provide additional time for Finance Director Meyer to prepare the sale of the bonds. Motion by Council Member Broussard. seconded by Council Member Lakso. to approve Resolution #07-039. a Resolution Rescheduline: the $2.600.000 General Oblie:ation Improvement Bond. Series 2007 A Bid Openine: Date. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Resolution #07-040 - Authorizing the CLPD to Enter Into a Grant Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety for Safe & Sober Communities Councilmember Broussard questioned whether this obligated the City to match funds. City Administrator Larson replied that it did not. He explained this is a way to adopt it without a special meeting of the joint powers Governing Board and provides funding for the safe and sober program. Motion by Council Member Lee. seconded by Council Member Lakso to approve Resolution #07-040. a Resolution Authorizine: the Centennial Lakes Police Department to Enter Into a Grant Ae:reement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety. Office of Traffic Safety for Safe & Sober Communities. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Sergeant Aldrich briefed the City Council and audience on the Safe and Sober Program. He stated every city in the county is part of the three year grant. He indicated 123 seat belt citations were made in one week. He stated seat belt compliance is about 95 percent. Mayor Capra asked if there is an average age that did not buckle up. Page 3 of5 ~ City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes October 24, 2007 - Sergeant Aldridge replied that he did not have the statistics. He commented the officers of the City of Centerville participated in several community events. He reported on violations in the City of Centerville over the past month. He commented that a home security program is under development by the CSO. 6. Resolution #07-041 Fairview Street Confirming Special Assessment on Improvements to City Administrator Larson reported this project should be completed soon. He reported the assessment amounts are very close to the estimate. Motion by Council Member Lee. seconded by Council Member Broussard. to approve Resolution #07-041. a Resolution Confirminf! Special Assessment on Improvements to Fairview Street. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. IX. ANNOUNCEMENTSIUPDATES 1. City Administrator Larson - (No report.) 2. Red Cross/CPR Councilmember Lakso reported that on November 3, 2007 from 8:45 a.m. to 12:45 p.m., the Red Cross would provide CPR training at St. Genevieve's at a cost of $45. She instructed interested parties to contact the Red Cross if interested. 3. Police Commission Report Councilmember Lee reported that the Police Commission is moving forward with community awareness training and funding to help officers become community oriented. 4. Appointments: Mayor Capra stated that two individuals applied for the positions on the Planning and Zoning Commission. Discussion ensued. Motion by Council Member Broussard. seconded by Council Member Lakso. to appoint Mr. Darrin Mosher to the Planninf! and Zoninf! Commission and accept his resif!Dation from the Parks and Recreation Committee. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Capra stated that the second candidate would be interviewed prior to the next Council meeting. Page 4 of5 1 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes October 24, 2007 XI. ADJOURNMENT Motion bv Council Member Broussard. seconded by Council Member Lakso to adiourn the October 24. 2007 City Council Meetine: at 6:57 p.m. and reconvened to the Work Session Meetine:. All in favor. Motion carried unanimous Iv. Transcribed by: Dianna Wise, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Page 5 of5 f CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION October 24, 2007 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their work session meeting on October 24,2007, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Mayor Mary Capra .. ~~:~!! E::~: N~:~o~~:: 9:45 P;ot APprOfed Council Member JeffPaar [f\@ ABSENT: STAFF: City Administrator Dallas Larson City Attorney Kurt Glaser City Engineer Mark Statz Public Works Director Paul Palzer Finance Director John Meyer I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Capra reconvened the October 24,2007, City Council Work Session at 7:08 p.m. II. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 1. 2009 Street Proiect City Engineer Statz reported that on the 2009 Street and Utility Improvement Project. He presented questions to the City Council concerning which items should be included in the project. He distributed the questions in outline format. A. Water Connections to Homes Discussion ensued. Mayor Capra clarified that the 2009 project is based on the Pavement Management Study. Mayor Capra requested that City Engineer Statz summarize the survey results. City Engineer Statz reported 31 comment forms were received. He summarized the results of the survey. He reported that in general, residents are opposed to the 2009 Street 9 City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes October 24, 2007 Project. He stated that many residents commented they had drainage concerns and believed the streets and curbs were in good condition; therefore, did not require repair. He commented that most of the comments came from residents of Center Street, Mill Road, and Peltier Lake Drive. Mr. Bob Nelson, 7164 Mill Road, addressed Council and questioned them as to how he would come up with the money to pay his proposed assessment of $15,000 to $20,000. He indicated he currently has drainage problems. He stated Mill Road has been reconstructed twice in 25 years. Mayor Capra informed residents that no final plans had been made and it is important to hear resident comments. Mrs. Diane Clancy, 1882 Center Street, stated there is not a drainage problem on Center Street and to change it is not necessary. She stated the $20,000 assessment is a real sticker shock. She indicated that she believes the timing is not good because of the CSAH 14 project. She expressed sentiments that residents did not have the money to pay the huge assessments proposed. Mr. Bob Mehsikhomer, 1890 Center Street, stated that residents of Centerville are over taxed and one of the highest taxed cities in the state. He stated that he objected to mandatory participation. He mentioned that he believes the 2009 Street Project would devalue property. Mayor Capra explained that sample appraisals of properties would be accomplished to help assure the Council that the assessments are appropriate. Mrs. Wanita Rodriguez, 1960 Center Street, requested that she go on record as agreeing with everything stated by Mrs. Clancy and Mr. Mehsikhomer. Mr. Jason Paulsen, 6928 Ivy Court, addressed Council and questioned whether the Lift Station was a driving force for the street project. He commented he would prefer to keep his well as a back up rather than capping it off. City Engineer Statz replied the Lift Station was not a driving force, rather it would be done at the same time. Discussion ensued. Councilmember Lakso stated that she would be in favor of deferring hook up until 2012. Councilmember Lee commented that he would not be in favor of revisiting the resolution. City Engineer Statz discussed deferred assessment options. Page 2 of5 /0 City of CenterviIle Council Meeting Minutes F October 24, 2007 Mayor Capra commented that additional information would be required before a decision could be made. She questioned Council if it desired to consider a program for Senior Citizens on fixed incomes and deferring the payment of an assessment until a house was sold. She indicated that the financial burden this would cause other residents would need investigation. City Administrator Larson pointed out the financial incentive may encourage people to hook up sooner rather than later. No consensus reached on changing the requirement for residents to hook up to the system within one year of services being available. City Attorney Glaser reported that in 2012, residents would be required to hook up to city water service, in any event. B. Proiect Phasing: City Engineer Statz requested Council's thoughts on whether everything could be accomplished in 2009 and if not, the residents on 73rd Street would like their improvements pushed back due to the anticipated local traffic attempting to avoid Main Street during that reconstruction project. Finance Director Meyer provided information on a worse case scenario of estimated future tax rates. Discussion ensued. Consensus was reached to complete everything in 2009. C. Rain Gardens City Engineer Statz provided information on rain garden options. Discussion ensued. Consensus reached that, by virtue of the Rice Creek Watershed District, the City is responsible for maintenance of rain gardens and therefore, the rain gardens should be established within City easements. Council agreed that if a resident wished to maintain a rain garden, the City would education them on how to do this. D. Mill Road Discussion ensued. Consensus was reached to downwade to Type D or E/A-1 Improvements for the road section between CSAH 14 and Prairie Drive for residents currently on City water and to leave Mill Road as a rural section. Page 3 of5 II City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes October 24, 2007 E. Peltier Lake Drive Consensus was reached to support the 28-foot street width design. F. Driveway Restoration Consensus was reached to match, in-kind, driveway skirt materials and require the contractor to match the flares and quality of materials. Photos are to be taken of each driveway prior to construction. G. Clearwater Drive Cul-de-sac Options Consensus was reached to reduce the cul-de-sac size per the recommendation of the Public Works Department. H. Assessment Issues City Administrator Larson explained that the assessment estimates were based upon the 2004 Policy. Discussion ensued. Consensus was reached to review the 2004 Policies further relative to the 2009 Street Project and appropriateness with state laws. 2. Downtown Infrastructure Improvement A. Proposed Trail Route City Engineer Statz updated Council on the trails and potential routes to Laurie LaMotte Park. Discussion ensued. Councilmember Lee stated that he would like input from the Parks and Recreation Committee before a decision is made. B. Proposed On-Street Parking Locations City Engineer Statz indicated that many areas did not warrant on-street parking. He pointed out where it should be considered. Discussion ensued. Consensus was reached to continue discussion at a later date. Page 4 of5 /1- City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes October 24, 2007 c. Water Services: Option A versus B After discussion, consensus was reached to select Option B, which is to install a single larger service to each building and then allow the developer to branch off and meter each unit. D. Sewer Services: Option A versus B After discussion, consensus was reached to select Option B, , which is to install a single larger service to each building and then allow the developer to branch off to serve each unit. E. Phasing City Engineer Statz explained that, completing the entire project in 2009 appears to be cost prohibitive. He outlined optional plans. Discussion ensued. Consensus was reached to continue discussion at a later date. III. ADJOURNMENT Motion bv Council Member Broussard. seconded by Council Member Lakso to adiourn the October 24. 2007 City Council Work Session at 10:15 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed by: Dianna Wise, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Page 5 of5 /3 CITY OF CENTERVILLE 11/09/07 10:47 AM Page 1 *Check Summary Register@ tervi[[e 'D;taGf:is!1e;{ 1,~57 NOVEMBER 2007 Name Check Date Check Amt 10100 MAIN STREET BANK Paid Chk# 022844 AVLlC 11/1/2007 Paid Chk# 022845 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOL 11/1/2007 Paid Chk# 022846 POSTMASTER 11/1/2007 Paid Chk# 022847 ARI CONSTRUCTION, LLC 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022848 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERL 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022849 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DE 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022850 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022851 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022852 CONNEXUS ENERGY 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022853 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022854 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVI 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022855 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022856 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPE 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022857 LAND MAINTENANCE 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022858 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022859 MARATHON ASHLAND 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022860 MENARDS - FOREST LAKE 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022861 MEYER, JOHN 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022862 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER AS 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022863 MN REALITY 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022864 NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022865 OLSON'S SEWER SERVICE, INC. 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022866 ON SITE SANITATION 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022867 PC SOLUTIONS, INC. 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022868 PRESS PUBLICATIONS 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022869 SAM'S CLUB 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022870 SHARPER HOMES 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022871 SIGN-A-RAMA 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022872 STORK TWIN CITY TESTING CO 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022873 SWEENEY, KRIS 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022874 TACHENY ROOFING & SIDING IN 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022875 TIME SAVER 11/14/2007 Paid Chk# 022876 TRU GREEN - CHEM LAWN 11/14/2007 Total Checks $631.00 DEF COMP W/H 11-1-07 $600.92 DEF COMP W/H 11-1-07 $235.86 COMP PLAN MEETING 11-13-07 POS $130.00 REIMBURSE BUILDING PERMIT #07- $71,405.42 GENERAL - SERV THRU 10-13-07 $39,548.70 NOV. 07 POLICE SERVICES $206.84 1785 PELTIER LAKE DR - SERV TH $6,247.13 INTEREST ON 2007 POLICE BLDG. $426.35 6900 20TH AVE - LIFT STAT. - S $104.70 SERV THRU OCT. 2007 $260.00 OCT. 24 & 25, 2007 J. MEYER IN $739.45 CHEMICALS $90.00 A. ANDERSON, J. MCPHERSON & T. $4,637.01 1970 ROBIN LN - OCT. 5 TIMES, $40.00 2007 REGIONAL MTG 1ST REGISTRA $116.25 FUEL - B.1. $218.78 SUPPLIES $473.01 REIMBURSE FOR MILEAGE FROM 8-0 $200.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES $30.56 OVERPYMT ON FINAL UT BILL - 68 $32.00 T. BENDER & J. MEYER LIFE INS. $246.44 LOCATING W/ LOCATING EQUIP & R $167.25 ACORN PARK $166.14 TREND MICRO CLIENT/SERVER SECU $81.40 WELL HEAD PROTECTION $355.17 MAINT. SUPPLIES $3,200.00 1337 MOUND TRL - 05-151 - ESCR $157.20 12X24 MAGNET PRINTED AND CUT T $639.82 OLD MILL RD UT & STR. fMPR. $31.53 REIMBURSE FOR MILEAGE FROM 10- $130.00 REIMBURSE FOR BLDG PERMIT 07-3 $443.45 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - 10-10-0 $1,702.75 TURF CARE - EAGLE PARK $133,695.13 Note: There will be an updated list of disbursements for approval on 11-14-07. I~ CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Check Register FIRE Gl Page; 1 GL Posting Period(s): 11107 - 11/07 Oct 31 , 2007 04:04pm Check Issue D8te(8): 1110112007 -1110112007 Per Date Check No Vendor No Payee Invoice Description Inv Amount 11/07 11101107 2943 11565 ASPEN MILLS UNIFORMS 78.05 UNIFORMS 91.05 Total 2943 169.10 11/07 11/01/07 2944 20114 RICK BANGERT UPDATED DISTRICT MAP 125.00 11/07 11101107 2945 20140 MILO BENNETT INSPECTOR VEH REPAIR 1,368.76 11/07 11/01107 2946 20400 DAVID BRUDER FIRE CHIEF'S CONF 569.36 EXPENSE 11/07 11101107 2947 30480 CENTENNIAL UTILlTfES STATION 1 UTIUTIES 78.78 11/07 11101107 2948 30485 CENTER MART FUEL 112.44 11/07 11101107 2949 31137 CONNEXUS ENERGY STATION 1 ELECTRIC 282.63 11/07 11101107 2950 50120 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAlNT, II' TANKER 31 MTC 2,624.70 ENGINE 11 MTC 319.14 ENGINE 11 MTC 758.73 TANKER BMTC 3,980.26 Total 2950 7,662.83 11107 11101107 2951 80200 JANET HMPOJA PRINTER INK 66.35 11107 11/01107 2952 100025 J & E SMALL ENGINE REPAIR ENGINE 21 RECOIL 10.00 11/07 11101/07 2953 120450 CITY OF L1NO LAKES SEPT FUEL 757.38 11107 11101107 2954 130290 MnFlAM BOOK SALES 2006INTL FIRE CODE 87.51 11107 11101107 2955 130460 METROCALL PAGERS 89.67 11/07 11/01107 2956 130840 MN FIRE SERVICE CERTIF. BOARD RECERTIFICATION 11 165.00 FIREFIGHTERS 11/07 11101107 2957 140700 NORTHLAND FIRE & SECURITY ARE EXT MTC 457.40 11/07 11/01107 2958 150150 GLEN A OLSON MN FIRE CHIEFS CONF 553.40 EXPENSE 11/07 11101107 2959 180200 MIKE T PETERSON MN SlATE CHIEF CONF 500.00 EXPENSES 11/07 11/01107 2960 180500 RANDY ROLSTAD CHIEFS CONFERENCE 483.30 EXPENSES 11/07 11101107 2961 200250 MICHAEL TSCHIDA EMf EXAM 70.00 11/07 11101107 2962 210050 USI EDUCATION & GOVT SALES LAMINATOR 234.99 11/07 11/01/07 2963 220200 VERIZON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS 2.58 Totals: 13,846.48 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check /S' CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT Check Regisl8r POLICE GL Page: 1 GL Posting Period(s): 11107 - 11107 Nov07,2OO7 04:01pm Check Issue O818(s): 1110112007 -1110712007 Per Dale Check No Vendor No Payee Invoice Description Inv Amount 11107 11107107 6473 10125 A.T.O.M. 2007 LAW ENFORCMENT 400.00 TRAININGNVJ 11107 11107107 6474 10500 AMERICAN GOODYEAR-GEMINI TIRES 1,3n.59 11107 11107107 6475 10590 AMERICAN MESSAGING NOV PAGER SERVICE 30.07 11107 11107107 6476 10750 ANOKA COUNTY SEPT INTERNET ACCESS 590.76 CHARGE 11107 11K11107 64n 20140 BARNUM GATE SERVICES, INC GATE REPAIR 330.30 11107 11107107 6478 30055 CSK AUTO, INC VEH 323.41 MA TTSlOIUWINSHIELD FLUID 11107 11107107 6479 30063 CP TELCOM PHONESIlONG DIST 345.26 11107 11/01107 6480 30480 CENTENNIAL UTILITIES SEPT UTILITIES 417.81 11107 11107107 6481 31137 CON NEXUS ENERGY ELECTRIC 1,171.52 11107 11K17/01 6482 31340 CRABTREE COMPANIES, INC LASERFICHE SUPPORT 303.90 11107 11107,\)7 6483 40300 DELTA DENTAL DEC DENTAL n1.55 11107 11107107 8484 40700 DON'S CIRCLE SERVICE. INC OCTOBER VEH MTC m.87 11107 11/07107 64B5 60650 FRATTAlLONES HARDWARE, INC. OFFICE SUPPLY 13.81 11107 11/01107 6486 70310 GALES AUTO BODY, INC 2006 F150 HAIL DAMAGE 1,642.88 REPAIR 11107 11107107 6487 90026 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, INC BUSINESS 321 .34 CARDSlTOWED VEH REPITIMEOFF REO 11/07 11107107 6488 100060 JEFF'S BOBBY&STEVES AUTO WOR TOW/STORAGE CADI 340.00 11107 11107107 6489 110204 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS GOVERNING BOARD 16.44 MEET SUPPLIES 11107 11107107 6490 130040 MACA FALL CONFERENCE 95.00 11107 11107,\)7 6491 130500 MIDWAY FORO INC POWER WINDOW 37.81 SWITCH 11107 11107107 6492 150100 OFFICE MAX CONTRACT, INC COPY PAPER 147.18 TONERIMISC 153.33 FILE FOLDERS 44.06 T018I6492 344.57 11/07 11107107 6493 160415 PITNEY BOWES METER RENTAUREFILL 111.80 CHARGES 11107 11107107 6494 160420 PITNEY BOWES POSTAGE BY PHON POSTAGE 182.99 11107 11107,\)7 6495 180140 RAMSEY COUNTY TRAINING J CORLEW 100.00 11107 11107,\)7 8496 190375 SELECT ACCOUNT OCT SELECT ACCT FEES 16.00 11107 11,\)7,\)7 6497 190390 SHRED RIGHT SHREDDING '57 .75 11107 11,\)7,\)7 6498 190910 STREICHER'S AMMO 25.56 11107 11107,\)7 6499 200043 TELECIDE PRODUCTIONS, INC NETWORK SUPPORT 62.50 11107 11,\)7,\)7 6500 210110 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, INC UNIFORMS 231.40 KRUEGER/JACOBSON 11/07 11107,\)7 6501 210120 UNI-5ELECT USA FORFEITURE BATTERY 76.38 11107 11107107 6502 210127 UNICARE LIFE & HEALTH INS. CO. DEC UFE/DISABILlTY 172.50 T olals: 10,683.n M = Manual Check, V = Void Check /6 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE OEPT Check Register POLICE GL GL Posting Period(s): 10107 - 10/07 Check Issue Oa.(s): 10113/2007 - 10/3112007 Page: 1 Nov 02, 2007 08:04am Per Date Check No Vendor No Payee Invoice Description Jnv Amount 10107 10131107 6472 401n DECISION RESOURCES,INC SURVEY RESEARCH 12.000.00 M Tolals: 12,000.00 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check /1 Embedded ~~~tem~, flnc. Tel. (763) 757-3696 www.embedsys.com 11931 Hwy 65 NE, Minneapolis, MN 55434 Fax: (763) 754..Q954 flarson@embedsys.com Contract Renewal October 25,2007 City of Centerville Dallas Larson 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 Weare at the end of another tornado season. Embedded Systems, Inc. has provided, what we believe, is our best service toward maintaining the tornado sirens for your city for the past several years. We would be very pleased to continue to provide Tornado Siren Maintenance for your city. The Monthly Siren Maintenance Fee for 2008 will be $37.95 per siren per month. Weare asking that you please sign and return this contract renewal to us before December 1 S\ 2007 to enable us to continue to provide our best service through the end of 2008. Feel free to fax the signed contract renewal to (763) 754-0954. Thank you for your business and we look forward to servicing your needs through the next year. If you have any questions feel free to contact me directly. Thank you, Francine Larson Embedded Systems, Inc. Contract terms accepted: Signature Date Phone For continuation of service through the end of the year 2008 /f all Site Secretarial November 1,2007 NOV 0 5 2001 Ms. Teresa Bender City Clerk City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 CENTERVILLE, MN Dear Teresa, Enclosed is an Addendum to the Recording Secretary Service Agreement. The Agreement reflects an increase of just under three percent for year 2008 and extends the expiration date to December 31, 2008. We appreciate the confidence you have placed in TimeSaver to handle your meeting minute needs and look forward to continuing that relationship in 2008. If you need further information or have questions, please feel free to contact me at 763-421-8999. Best regards, ~ Carla Wirth Owner Enclosure: Recording Secretary Service Agreement Return envelope 28601 Hu/JD"rivea MatlLMn Lake, MN56063 · 763-421-8999 · Fax 507-931-1668 /1 ADDENDUM TO RECORDING SECRETARY SERVICE AGREEMENT Dated: December 31,2007 By and between TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. and the City of Centerville, 1880 Main Street, Centerville, MN 55038. 1. EXTENSION OF RECORDING SECRETARIAL SERVICE AGREEMENT: The term of the existing Recording Secretary Service Agreement dated December 31, 2006 shall be extended under the same terms and conditions to December 31, 2008. 2. TOSS Charges. TOSS shall be paid for its services as recording secretary for each meeting (the highest rate will prevail), as follows: a. Base Rate of One Hundred Twenty-Two and 50/100 dollars ($122.50) for any meeting up to one (1) hour (billable time) plus Thirty and 25/100 dollars ($30.25) for each thirty (30) minutes following the first one (1) hours; Q!: b. Twenty-six and 75/100 dollars ($26.75) per hour for length of meeting, and fifteen (15) minutes prior to Call to Order and fifteen (15) minutes following Adjournment with a one and one-half (1.5) hour minimum; and Eleven and 95/100 dollars ($11.95) for each page of minutes prepared from shorthand or machine notes of the recording secretary as draft minutes for submission to and the review and comment of the City of Centerville for their preparation of final minutes. At the end of the term of this Addendum or any extension of it, the parties may make a new Agreement or extend or modify the terms of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Addendum to the Recording Secretary Service Agreement as of the day and year indicated. January _, 2008 CITY OF CENTERVILLE By Dallas Larson Its City Administrator November 1,2007 TIMESA VER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL, INC. By ~~ Carla Wirth Its President & CEO 2tJ ervi{{e 'E<ta6fi"fieJ 185( STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #07 - 0_ A RESOLUTION ADOPTING DELINQUENT SEWER, WATER & GARBAGE SERVICES FOR RESIDENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE 3RD AND 4TH QUARTER 2006, 1ST AND 2ND QUARTERS OF 2007 BILLING CYCLES AND ASSESSING SAME TO PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS THROUGH COUNTY PROPERTY TAX STATEMENTS PAYABLE IN 2008 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the certification of delinquent municipal utilities and garbage service or a combination of both; and, Past Due Past Due HOUSE Water/Sewer Garbal!:e Admin. Fee Total PIN # NUMBER Street Name $181.87 $50.00 $231.87 14 3 1 22 44 0046 1956 72 1/2 STREET $957.47 $50.00 $1,007.47 143122440048 1968 721/2 STREET $139.95 $261.24 $50.00 $451.19 143122440012 1949 72ND STREET $1,197.53 $356.24 $50.00 $1,603.77 14 31 22 44 0027 1980 72ND STREET $400.66 $263.44 $50.00 $714.10 143122430062 1828 73RD STREET $154.92 $50.00 $204.92 14 3 1 22 43 0063 1834 73RD STREET $163.86 $50.00 $213.86 23 31 22 41 0051 6996 BRIAN DRIVE $478.86 $454.86 $50.00 $983.72 23 31 22 11 0092 7174 BRIAN DRIVE $902.91 $50.00 $952.91 143122440088 7244 BRIAN DRIVE $603.93 $71.89 $50.00 $725.82 14 31 22 44 0084 7260 BRIAN DRIVE $372.93 $50.00 $422.93 14 31 22 44 0083 7264 BRIAN DRIVE $166.19 $50.00 $216.19 143122410012 7335 BRIAN DRIVE $242.07 $261.24 $50.00 $553.31 233122 11 0074 7120 BRIAN WAY $116.52 $50.00 $166.52 233122110069 7135 BRIAN WAY $109.80 $50.00 $159.80 23 31 22 11 0039 1967 CARDINAL DRIVE $161.80 $50.00 $211.80 23 31 22 31 0007 1729 CENTER STREET $63.80 $78.58 $50.00 $192.38 23 31 22 31 0026 1744 CENTER STREET $202.68 $50.00 $252.68 23 3 1 22 3 1 0011 1761 CENTER STREET ~J.. $116.52 $50.00 $166.52 233122240034 7072 CENTERVILLE ROAD $273.24 $50.00 $323.24 233122230017 7085 CENTERVILLE ROAD $261.24 $50.00 $311.24 233122230019 7087 CENTERVILLE ROAD $10.50 $50.00 $60.50 233122340002 6892 CENTERVILLE ROAD $710.04 $143.04 $50.00 $903.08 143122340054 7236 CLEAR RIDGE $255.20 $270.24 $50.00 $575.44 233122420023 6911 DUPRE ROAD $379.46 $50.00 $429.46 233122130098 7038 DUPRE ROAD $1,605.37 $261.24 $50.00 $1,916.61 143122430053 1823 FOX RUN $66.06 $50.00 $116.06 233122120075 1824 FOX RUN $168.31 $50.00 $218.31 233122210033 7162 GRANGE VIEW $914.91 $55.75 $50.00 $1,020.66 233122120054 1828 HAYFIELD ROAD $63.80 $54.33 $50.00 $168.13 233122240013 1749 HERITAGE STREET $396.76 $214.94 $50.00 $661.70 233122120072 1832 HOULE CIRCLE $1,174.40 $214.94 $50.00 $1,439.34 233122120061 1841 HOULE CIRCLE $1,262.60 $50.00 $1,312.60 233122330025 1671 HUNTER'S TRAIL $446.60 $54.33 $50.00 $550.93 2331 22420041 6944 IVY COURT $261.24 $50.00 $311.24 233122420040 6948 IVY COURT $569.43 $50.00 $619.43 143122330020 1692 LAKELAND CIRCLE $510.40 $50.00 $560.40 233122 24 0021 1740 MAIN STREET $308.78 $50.00 $358.78 233122240002 1764 MAl N STREET $192.69 $167.76 $50.00 $410.45 233122130013 1858 MAIN STREET $29.65 $50.00 $79.65 233122130013 1858 MAIN STREET $62.71 $50.00 $112.71 233122120093 1871 MAIN STREET $198.29 $50.00 $248.29 153122440040 7246 MAl N STREET $1,319.04 $383.52 $50.00 $1,752.56 233122310060 6959 MEADOW CIRCLE $178.49 $50.00 $228.49 233122310055 6978 MEADOW CIRCLE $259.74 $50.00 $309.74 233122310042 1735 MEADOW LANE $191.40 $259.74 $50.00 $501.14 233122120010 7178 MILL ROAD $510.40 $267.83 $50.00 $828.23 233122120008 7192 MILL ROAD $41.27 $50.00 $91.27 233122120087 7154 MILL ROAD $510.40 $261.24 $50.00 $821.64 233122420015 6908 OAK CIRCLE $61.52 $50.00 $111.52 233122420017 6926 OAK CIRCLE $421.15 $50.00 $471.15 143122420015 7313 OLD MILL ROAD $1,691.06 $231.40 $50.00 $1,972.46 143122420029 7336 OLD MILL ROAD )3 $444.40 $261.24 $50.00 $755.64 233122310002 1744 PARTRIDGE PLACE $789.10 $261.24 $50.00 $1,100.34 143122310026 7319 PEL TIER CIRCLE $703.78 $50.00 $753.78 143122310043 7320 PEL TIER CIRCLE $2,184.51 $474.50 $50.00 $2,709.01 143122310027 7323 PEL TIER CIRCLE $933.53 $50.00 $983.53 143122310047 7360 PEL TIER CIRCLE $1,114.00 $50.00 $1,164.00 143122310039 7363 PEL TIER CIRCLE $851.01 $50.00 $901.01 143122310047 7364 PEL TIER CIRCLE $231.50 $50.00 $281.50 14 31 22 31 0041 7373 PEL TIER CIRCLE $510.40 $275.51 $50.00 $835.91 14 31 22 31 0007 1759 PEL TIER LAKE DRIVE $1,110.04 $301.24 $50.00 $1,461.28 143122430050 7231 PETERSON TRAIL $289.80 $50.00 $339.80 143122430045 1828 PRAIRIE DRIVE $63.80 $273.24 $50.00 $387.04 233122210028 7128 PROGRESS ROAD $1,185.28 $463.18 $50.00 $1,698.46 143122430086 1870 QUEBEC STREET $165.95 $50.00 $215.95 143122430075 1875 QUEBEC STREET $319.00 $194.74 $50.00 $563.74 23 31 22 11 0017 1960 ROBIN LANE NORTH $319.00 $50.00 $369.00 233122110022 1988 ROBIN LANE NORTH $127.60 $50.00 $177.60 23 31 22 11 0044 1995 ROBIN LANE SOUTH $510.40 $261.24 $50.00 $821.64 23312211 0012 7169 ROBIN LANE WEST $88.81 $50.00 $88.81 23 31 22 11 0035 1988 ROBIN LANE SOUTH $127.60 $50.00 $177.60 233122120018 7159 SHAD AVENUE $510.40 $261.24 $50.00 $821.64 233122120015 7181 SHAD AVENUE $516.20 $261.24 $50.00 $827.44 233122230015 1695 SOREL STREET $510.40 $50.00 $560.40 23312231 0018 6923 TOURVILLE CIRCLE $160.56 $50.00 $210.56 143122440063 7252 TWIN LAKES AVE. $165.04 $50.00 $215.04 143122440050 7234 UNITY AVENUE $274.85 $50.00 $324.85 143122440054 7256 UNITY AVENUE $995.09 $232.50 $50.00 $1,277.59 143122440055 7260 UNITY AVENUE $589.50 $50.00 $639.50 24 3 1 22 22 0080 2002 WILLOW CIRCLE $112.32 $50.00 $162.32 243122220077 2005 WILLOW CIRCLE $777.29 $50.00 $827.29 243122220071 2026 WILLOW CIRCLE $180.72 $50.00 $230.72 243122220093 2044 WILLOW CIRCLE $268.36 $50.00 $318.36 243122220099 2052 WILLOW CIRCLE $228.76 $50.00 $278.76 243122220164 2062 WILLOW CIRCLE $308.54 $50.00 $358.54 243122220178 2078 WILLOW CIRCLE d.~ $79.38 $50.00 $129.38 243122220178 2078 WILLOW CIRCLE $676.24 $50.00 $726.24 2431 22220205 2086 WILLOW CIRCLE $374.47 $50.00 $424.47 243122220204 2087 WILLOW CIRCLE $809.08 $50.00 $859.08 243122220188 2096 WILLOW CIRCLE $837.86 $50.00 $887.86 243122220198 2115 WILLOW CIRCLE $40,129.47 $10,464.42 $4,550.00 $55,093.89 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable over a period of one (1) year, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2008, and bear only the late payment fee of 10% interest. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with late fees accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk, no certification fee will be charged if the entire assessment is paid within thirty (30) days from the adoption of this resolution; and he/she may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with late fees and certification fees. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council this 14th day of November, 2007. Attest City Clerk Mayor J6 City Clerk, Teresa Bender tervi{{e Attest: <E,..;ta6{ished- 18S7 1880 :Main Street, CenterVilk, 'M:N 55038 651-429-3232 or 'FaJ( 651-429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION # 07-0_ A RESOLUTION RECOUPING COSTS FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT, 1970 SOUTH ROBIN LANE, CENTER"VaLE, MINNESOTA (pIN #lU3-31-22-11..oo38) WHEREAS, the City requested that the property owner of record abate a Nuisance, Grass Length, at the above stated address on May 30, 2007; and WHEREAS, the property owner of record was given until June 11, 2007 to comply with the City's request otherwise the City would provide services and recoup associated costs; and WHEREAS, the City provided proper notification; and WHEREAS, the City provided proper notification of its right to reimburse itself for the associated lawn maintenance costs through the 429.101 process if said violation was not abated within its given timeframe and designated Staff ordered its abatement; and WHEREAS, the owner of the property was given proper notification of assessment for each mowing and same being placed on the property taxes of PIN #&23-31-22-11-0038 payable in 2008. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA: 1) That the Finance Director or the City Clerk of the City of Centerville forward this resolution to the Anoka County Property Tax Division for the assessment of $718.60 plus interest added from the date of this resolution through December 31, 2008 to be placed on PIN #R23-31-22-11-0038 payable in 2008 for expenditures associate with the lawn maintenance at the residence in August, September & October of 2007. Adopted by the City Council of Centerville on November 14, 2007. Mayor, Mary Capra 2b ,.;;", l"'c\~ ',~ ~.,'o,\,,~,:~'.l~o":."-:. ':'~'~'~~""'_\~~' "c., ;.J..,\.,,~,\~, ..'.. ,;. "_"._~,l h'-\:~',' ~""""'...:.,;~"-"~;.: Co, '~:~-.!..:.,h-':': ,~;._ ,'."~, ~;",:.~ ,",' ;:.,., :~; \""-'~'~'.; ".;.~,'~': '".;,~~ '.~~ ,\ ,\", ',~, -.' 'l:,;"_'.' '. " ,'-~~.;o "'" '.'.~'. '_l' :, ';",~,' ,. ,l~._ ,';~ ,'--'-, ..,',,~ '~,' ,__~',.~" ,'.'!-",'.,'.I.,'"~',\': ':. i' C\";.,o.;. ,~.,-, \, .,i ,:.:..,_<':, ')'..],"..:..;.,,:,; '. ,~"~~.\,):;'~..'2,;,i;.,-,-"~.,,,;' ':a., ')..~'.:,...:'::'C:~':,;.'., ,~)~':;c,: ,-',),,-"~'.;,::: :..,;'i,:_~~"'.::':,:....\~,:"...~;~;i'!..:':,'.:"'.i:.~Jl:;~,;,,,,':'.~i.;..;.'j License ~ -.-~-" JfJ/z rJO. ::;lcX-t~ / H~Y k~ ~ zsCr-V r . 7" .r _.',' ~-I IlrIb e.... 1.11111....111. 6626 East Shadow Lake C Phone 651-653-4; PROPOSAL City Of Centerville Centerville, MN We hereby submit specifications and estimate for: WELLHOUSE NUMBER 1 480 Square Feet of Cultured Stone Facia & Soffit Shingles-4 Square Fake Rock for well head Eliminate window, remove old siding, facia & soffit Exhaust fan with pick up on floor & outside switch With lock cover Install Eyewash station & exterior handicapped Accessible drinking fountain New front door with window & locks Remove old capacitors Contractor fee 12,480.00 1500.00 1000.00 300.00 200.00 2000.00 TOTAL 3500.00 1500.00 200.00 2200.00 24,880.00 We hereby propose to furnish labor and materials -complete in accordance with the above specifications, for the sum of Twenty-four thousand Eight hundred Eighty Dollars ($ 24,880.00) with payment to be made as follows: Balance to be paid upon completion. All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices. Any alteration from above specifications involving extra costs, will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the agreement contingent upon material strikes, accident or delays beyond our control. This proposal subject to acceptance within 45 days of receipt or it is void and must be re-submitted. Novenber7,2007 .loe Kouba North Country Builders, Inc. AcceDtance of DroDosa' The above prices, specifications and conditions are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. ACCEPTED: Date: Signature: ~ ~~:::;_ ~ :'::;:~:i~-:": ~;~~:: ,,: ":"<:'. ;_8J>;";<~~~>:~;"i;' , I, I :\ ',-, I :; I ~ I~ Q ~I "I ..'" "I ~" 6 " ~, ..>_.- .'~":";"'___O'w ._".A... ,~ \N, :i ", '''wOO-t. -:.- _--J-- ~\."-..... --r~ .......... .... 'r~ ~:~ .......,.;;. .....~. -~;;-, '17\ h..' S 2 -~.{ ~.~ 40 , ~;t . -ao~ 'q~ '\ " . 1I4.00-l 57.00 ./ ./ / / / / / ./ ~-- .,.... _---44i.eG" o \-v e <t. \-- I f f~X:; v-c:.. ~ ~e.c:1--<" ~ _---sii.ii'4N- - N~.oo'CO"'W ""'OO~~ &7.00 ~1.00 ,- r,) ... -~-DO"Do.1t' .,"'" , "'... tr4.00 '"{ .,... l" t ~g 26 h 25 5~ 27 ~~ f ~ ~Q ~ - H<<s:.OO'oo"'W 07... n..oo ... 51".00 S7.00 $7.00 57.00 :'4 N8&.OO"ocrw "....00 _ , "'... B --- \ '-WET fi-'N8:.~"~~;'W i UND"1 GRAPHIC SCALE .. _~ f k.._ ~l.DroH-eoJ'D'J' 'i NOTES: " o DD/O~ '/2 INCH DM. X ,., INCHES IN lENC7H IRON IIONiJltltNT SET AND I/ARKED BY UCENSE 110. 10U7 . DENOTES MIJNUMENT FOUND FfJR THE CAST UN!: see. Do HAV1HG A .... . ~ ;... ..., b o 2; OF mlS PLAT THC "ilL',. ~,JI/t AS 1. 'NQ OF N otr2f'SO If. H "'30'17" W "3.711 DNAINAOE AND ImUTY ~ ARt SHOWN THUS: =: :"rfo%:m:r&".f;Ig'~~ IlUlHT-OF-WAY UNa IINLm 0IHlRlVISt SHOWN OH THt PlAT. I I f 1-. II "1, -o---..J L_-o~ PARK I '!"" ",00 al ~8 8 "'00 S ",)8'1" E tl::lli 18 i 8~~'1~E . . "'40 I "'00 . "'30'17" E S ae-a'f7- E 141.9... I II 19 I I ~ I I Am ; ".u. -'"""', I ...11!1"'-'==-.-.... \ /:: - .-.-', ....., \ '/ ~"'......-.- .\\\~"" ~r .'\~ ~..." - - WET \ 'v ,r."tt" /.--D R A I N A 0 E '" \ +~,,(,(L._._._._ AND LAN 0-... ~'" JI' /.-. 'j UTILI TV _~,.... ut'.A"J1".1-..r=-'lF'--'-Jl.-JaO.1I~_./ , ) ~ N :;! dl /91 ................ -......................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................... -.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................... PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: SOREL 'S END L CITY OF 'r !". CENTERVILLLE \ ;::, ,', ~ s -I- II ~> S T R > 18" RCP SANITARY SEWER LEGAL DESCR I PT ION OF PROPERTY TO BE PLA HED Lots 7, 6 and that part of Lot 9, Block 12, lying west of the east 120 feet; Lot 5 and that part of Lots 4 and 6, Block 1), lying east of the west 20 feet; that part of the vacated 2ND Street lying southerly of a line drawn from the northwest corner of Block 12 to the northeast corner of Block 1) and north of a line drawn From the the southwest corner of Lot 9, Block 12, to the southeast corner of Lot4, Block 1); All in the plat of CENTERVILLE, Anoka County, Minnesota. ..' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..4 ~ . " .4 :::-J .. :::::.."'" ... G :' ~ : tJ . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : ~ : ~ : !<J : ~ /J r . ~ . ':.} : ~ \ : (!j .~: :' i!j 'J- :.. I::! . ~ &../ : ~ : ~ . ~ :' [f . Q, : ~ :' / .... / f..-/ A. ~'~' 4: ::,.'::,.' (:)' (:)' 4:1 ~.~' 10., r::f;:; ~~. ~ 'O~ "'liii I, II ~~ \J~ ~ CJ . I 14 4t: "'I "" Il7 ~ ..... ~ QJ ~ ...... 4:1l ~ ~ c... QJ ~ ~ "" "" lo.. R:'R:' -, Oi Oi .......... RLK-STP^ULI/^TER\SEC23\H1.NSEN PREPL T-REV. QXd o 10' public drainage 18" RCP STORM SEWER .-.-- << << ~N 89024'50"E --~--229,21 ----- and utility easement per doc. << << .' .'~ '1.'1 , ~e ,\ ,,'b \' ~'I.~-r 0"" ~ ,1 '{\ ,'" , E T {'I., 0' ~o e ~ {d \\~oo~ 00 0"" { O~'I. oe <:J.<:~? 'I. ~ \\ e e~ ~ ^6 0~ ~,.? - e~ ::llJ Q) c: - -. I 00 c: -c: ~ ~ 0 00 C\l Q) ~ ..Q _ ~ ~'i o 0 0 o ' ..... 0.. (f) I I INj FEET '. I, .. ,,- III o~ "" 0" ",6 III E III 0 . u = " III '" ... '- ., .. u -" .. 6" "0 0 -, "'" <n , ,.0 "" UJ- III >- <c. .. "'~ = .. <- III z >- 0 0:: >- <C ~ ~1-- '" u ~<I: <n w _-.J '" ......JCL >- w W w 0:: :J: <n 0... c:: Q) en c:: 0 :c Q) <n c:: >- 0 z w -' U 0 06 -U >-. 0 --.J . 0 D~ _ - c-. 0 D > ........ ~;!~i f~~~~ Uifi " E~ :i ;~ :i ~" ".; -'- !~ I!:! / <3% if ~ ~L..; I '" ~ 'I ~ ..\J 6 !J t0~ ~r:: ~~!!:'~ &~ < I _..... I ',) ~ ~ I , ~ii! '~: ~~ ! ~{:J <'. ~ ~ -:~ 'J- ~\J! '. 0 " ~ 'I 'J - ..:" }; y / / ~ / / II If) ~ ~ /, (:) ..... ' f!f .~: Q; :~, If ' L..; fl" ~ , . ~ .., 'I L..; " ::;; ::,. G ~ e SCALE: 1 IN~= JO FEET, O::?~~L,." <RE ~, <= 200 = RECORD OR D SCRIBED DIMENSION 1 0 4 = PROPOSED LO DIMENSION . = IRON PIPE M WUMENT FOUND IN PLACE -. -= PROPOSED LOl LINE @ = CAST IRON M NUMENT FOUND /:y f..... ~ Q:.' ~ 20 26.7 LOT 2 ,- -- \ I~ o -.c~ <G~ 'C\l 0'- 0 "t~ o (f)_ .; ~ ./ . 'r 7 , '/ .. o o ..~ l2: ." * :II ......:..0 ..tDi~ ...0 o ':11- oC l2: "" ..: ... III . ~ III >O.~"'~ 0111 t:l k'llll" co . >="~III ~...lIlco" :J"'=:~ ll)~<Il"1ll ~ii~~ ~..~.... :J g = lI:l i ... ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-................................. - - - -120,00 - - - - S 89024'50"W ~ # 1550 32 16,36o~ sq.ft. 5.1 garage '" d .... '. ., '. , , wood deck '" ~ 71.3 ,-, ". rr , ... 5 I I lC\ " . , 1'\ - - - -166,911- -;~;-- S 69D24'5 "W, , d, n: , ~ .l ~ , ' 1,) ,....~..., J _ 1-. ) SCALE " "::'" , t.... I i'.... , "'.. I , r" v J "~: . < " , \ 01 - I I l- I , , , " .l J.. , , " "1: 1-. ) . -' , ....,: " , ,.... ') , , 2 " , . , 9-27-07 I" '30' 11 x 17 rev. 10-25-07 SOREL'S !:i ~~ ~ It J..:. o (j {:, :~ : "-...; :J' . '.J ~... ......" :'!;j ,,,- ,<:) , :' i; 'J :' /::J : ~ : ~ : :\ : ~ ~ '<: --- --- 0\0\ .... (;::(;:: "'''' ~ ,,' ,,' /J:; ::,.'::,.' (:;'(:;' ~ ~'~' (... ':~ ~~ '0'0 '0 ~ ~ tJ ~;' c,2j I , j .:.-/ i"~'" I o 20 r;~J1!P:JlIC SCJlL'E. 1 l!1(C:Jl . 20 LEGEND . o r.... ff ~'f! ~ ~ '" ,Cl. "'l "'l 'J" -0 /i! > "_.:.:_.~ V /'" / / /~, / / II ~ br: ~ "'l ""' /J -& .,' ~ , '-J " '-J 00 ~ It !; /2 {:, I--.. '<: Q:' '" '" IlJ --- " : : '-J :[, " i. (:; '" f!; 0 ,,' !}j ,',,' Q, ,.. (/, i;!, . '<: i. 'i \j ':) ~"I , -'-- '" '" ll,- k ,:[& ('. i;j;;j 'J f!; 1 . c, . ~ '" '-J I 40 1!1( 1"'E.'E.'l' I 60 1"'E.'E.'l' DENOTES I NCH I RON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND @ DENOTES 112 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET /lND N.....RKED WITH MN LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR NO. 20270. DENOTES CAST IRON MONUMENT SET BY ST. PAUL WMER DEPARTMENT FOUND. $ DENOTES Jl8 INCH DRILL HOLE IN CONCReTE SET. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE NORTH LINE OF THE BLOCK 12. CENTERVILLE, IS ASSUMED TO BE^R N ag"24"SO"E. END " " " ~ r; v -------- ~~---.)r: ----166,91----- 5 69'24'51"W ,) 'r f'j I 1 \ DRAINAGE AND UTILiTY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS, I NO SCALE I o L I I s~ I Ls 0 ~L-.I BEING 10 FEET tN WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES AND BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH ^ND ADJOINING LOT LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAT. KURTH SURVEYING, INC, 4002 JEFFERSON ST. N.E. COLUMBIA HEIGHTS. MN 55421 PHOi'E:(763) 788-9769 r AX:(763) 788-7602 ~; ,-, (' ,) N 89'24'50"E -----229,21 ----- ...----42,29---- ~ ': , / I ~/ ,0'5/ / 1 ....Avq"l / / / L .(j~,~2-,~,:,,:,,-----/.\... / /~ L / -- .~/ ;" Sd9'24'50"W I ....CI,/~ '" lM,52 b-' /'1.0 / - - - - - -y" S89'S9'18"W _--200.41--- -"' s /_ _- - 0 0 '" "I -r I ~ ~ ! ~ /1 I \ \ ==-=J- '" j-. 'J" 'J" J 2!!:.. 06 , . d. 2 I I :} '" 5 ,- - - \ l~ o '-O~ >0_ ~~ "'- o - - - - 1 20, 00 5 89'24'50"W I \ \ _ J5 II: {f)~ ,", -r , " r I I '" ------'-.- - , ,'" I I I I , , " " ." . , ; I.} " ',,~ ..... '" / / \ \ , I 20 iO'" ~~ a a " '" 20 '" o o 20 \ --'0 ~ '" '< 20 I I I -J- I I I \ I, Ra~d)' L. Kllnh, do hereby_cendy Ihot I hove l\lr!eyed ond,p'lolled the properly'.described on thi~ plaT os SOREL SEND, IhaT Ihll pial II 0 correCl represenlatlon of laid' lurYey; ThaT a~1 allronc,u ore cor~ecllr .ho.n in fut l?nd hllndredlh, or a foot; Ihol 011 monumenl~ lill be correctly placed In Ihe ground os de~lgnoled; Ihol ~~lb~II~~~1;n~~~dd~~~e~i~h~no~~ ~h~:~clly .holn on the plot; and that there are nO u'l lo/)d, or p~blJC highla)'J ~i~ ~ ,. ~; /'L i ~~~ ~ ~oN~. S2027bor STATE OF MINNESOT^ I COUNTY OF I 5ANT I I r"'e foregoing SYrYeyorl certificafe rOI o~knolledged belore Ill. Ihis _ day or 200 _ , by Randy l. KlIrlh, Minnesola license No. 20270 Koren J. Ku~ t h Notary ~ub! ie;, honl i Counly, Minnesolo My COllllllsllon Expires Jalluary 31,2010 Thia plat of,SOREl.S END, las opproyed and accepted by the City CounCil of Ihe City of CenterYllle, Mlnnesola, 01 0 re911!Q~ lrIeetrng thereol held d'll ~ day of ,200 _ If applicable. Ihe Irlllen commenll and recommendOllonl of lhe COllml"loner of irOnspOrlatlOn and Ihe Co~nth Hlg"'IOY Engineer haye ~:~~m;:~d~:~~n~: ~~ep~~~rd~d ~;eM~~~=~~;~e~I~?u~~LPs:~~10~a505~gre~ub~:~~~~0~e2~ipl or IIlC couenh and Mayor Checked and approved Ihi, _ day of Clerk ,200_ ^noka Co~nly Surveyor ~ o co., 0.,--- o if) CITY OF CENTERVILLE COUNTY OF ANOKA SEC. 23, T.31, T.22 KNOW ^LL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS; That Llyod Norman Hansen ond Dione Koy Hansen, husband and "ife, ouers alld proprietor 01 the following deseribed properly. ,iluoted il'l t"'e COllnt)' of Anoka. Slole 01 Minnesota, to wit: All thaI port of Ihe rolloling described property lying nonh of "line A" 10 be hereinorler described: ,; Allor LoIs 7 ond 6. Block 12, CENTERVILlE, ^noka County, Minnesota ^nd Ih01 port of Lol 9, Block 12, CENTERVILLE, lying leslerly of the West line of the East 120.00 feet And all of yocoted "Second Street" lyill9 betleen ,aid Bloc~ 12 and Block 13; lying ,0IlTt, of the North line of said Blocks 12 ol'ld 13, being Ihe sOlJe os the Soulh line os 'Sorel Slreet"; and lying nonh of 1he line con!l8cling ,he Southeosl corner of lot -4,soid Block 13, liln Ihe Soulh'esl corner 01 said Lot 9, Slack 12, all in laid CENTERVJllE. And LoiS, said Block 13, CENTERVILLE. And lols 4 and 6, said Block 13, CENTERVIllE; EJCepT ing frolll said Lots 4 and 6 that port Ihereof knoln known os Ihe .Weslerly 20 feef Ihereof nOI" taken by the City of Saint Paul for Waler righls", The Easlerly line of said "Weslerly 20 reel lhereof" is 10 be hereorler described os "Line B" for lhe purposes of I"i s descr ipt ion. Soid "Line "" being described os Commencing 01 lhe Norlheost corner of said Lot 7, Block 12; lhence south along Ihe Eo:!.1 line of said Lot 7 for 0 distance of 71.50 fee' 10 lhe acluol poinl of beginning or said "line ".; Ihence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 18 seconds West ror a dislonce of 200.41 feet; thence North 67 degrees 48 minllles 33 seconds West for 0 distance of 52.88, lIore or leu, 10 intersect l/-'e aboYe described "Line S" and 'here termino1ing. Said south line of Sorel Streel is assumed 10 bear due East and Wesl. A,d f; Thai Uyod Erick Ooyid Mennoll and Lynoe Marie Marshall, husband ond wife, OW/len, and CoUnlty.ide Mortgage, o MinneSOTa corperotion, 1Il0ngogee, of the follo.ing described property. ,iluoled in Ihe County of Anoka, Stele of Minnesota, 10 wi I: All Ihal port or Ihe rolloling described prope-rly lying sOlllh of "Line- A" to be here-inorler described. " 11I1 of lols 7 and 8, Block 12. CEN1ERVILlE, ^noke COllnty, Minnesota. "nd that port of lol 9, Block 12, CENTERVIllE, lying lesterly of lhe West lif'le of Ihe Eosl 120.00 feet, "nd 011 of vocol&d 'Secof\d Street" lying betl"een said Block 12 and B!ock 13; !yi/)g ,o~,h of Ihe Nor1h line of said Bloch 12 and 13, being the some os the Soulh line as "Sorel Stteel.; and lying norlh of Ihe line connecling Ihe SOlltheast corner of lot 4,said BI(!ck 13, .ith Ihe South"esl corner of said lol 9, Block 12, 0/ I ill said CENTERVILlE. "nd lot 5, said Block 13, CENTERVILLE. "nd LoIs 4 and 6, laid Block 13, CENTERVILLE; Excepting from said Lots 4 ond 6 1nal port fhereof knou known os the .We31er!y 20 feet Ihereof no", token by the City of Saint Paul for Woler righls". The Easterly line of said "Weslerly 20 feel lhereof" i$ 10 be hereafter described os "Line B" ror Ihe purposes of Ihis deuriplion. Soid "line A" being described 0$ Commencing 01 Ihe NorlheosI corner of said lol 7, Block 12; thence soulh along Ihe East line of laid lor 7 for 0 distance of 71.50 Feet to the ocl~oJ pDint of beginning of said -line A"; Ihence Soulh 89 degrees 59 lIIinules 18 secof'lds West for 0 distance of 200.-41 feel; thence North 67 degrees 48 min~le~ 33 seconds West for a distance or 52.88, IIlore or less, 10 inter~ecl the obaye described "lfne B. and there lerminatinlj. Said south line or Sorel SlreeT ;~ assumed 10 bear d~e Eosl and WeaT, Hove caused Ihe some to be ,~r.,eyed and plotled 0$ SOREL'S END, ond do hereby donale and dflodicole to the public, ror public IIse foreyer, the drainage and II1ili1y Qasement os shown on Ihe pIal In lilne" _hereof said Llyod Norman Hansen and Dione Kay Hansen, hllsbond and life, hove herellnla ~et their hands Ihis _ day of 200_ Llyod Norman Honsen Dione Ko)' Hansen ST^TE OF MINNESOT^ COUNTY OF I The foregoing inslr~lIIent 10S oe;knowledged before me thit _ day of by llyod Norman Hansen and Dione Kay Hansen. hllsband af'ld life ,200_ , 'r Notary P~bl ic, My Commission Expires County,_ In lilness Ihereor said Erick Dayid Manholl and Lynoe Marie Marshall. h~sband and .!fe, hove hereunto set their hands This _ day of , 200_ Er I ck Day i d Mar sholl Lynae Mar ie Mor sno II STATE OF MINNESOlf\ COUNTy OF J The foregoing instr~lIenl la~ acknowledged before me this _ doy of by Erick David Marshall and Lynae Marie Maraholl, husband and lire. ,200_, Notary Pub I ic, My Commission Expires COlin I y, In .ilne~s Ihereof ~aid Countrywide Mortgage, 0 Minne~oto Corporal ion, has co~sed Ihe~e presenh 10 be signed by its proper officer t"'is _ day of .200_ ST ^ TE OF MI NNESOT A COUN1Y OF The foregoing instrlllllenl 10$ ocknolledged before me Ihis _ day of ,200 _ , by of Co~nlry.,ide Mongage, 0 MinnesOlo corporation, on behalf or the corporation. NOTary p~bl ie, My COlllllission Expires COlln1y, !2"c:ll= 33~1, tervif[e 18/10"';' $I:Ntf, C........... ~.rSOU cr-4n-JVl "''F&tCJ~ -Csta6fislietf 1851 CITY OF CENTDVILU APPUCATION IlOR SUBDIVISIONfWNING APPLICATION SUBDMSIONIZONING APP: FEE: $200.00 + SlOO.OOILot ~.OO) REZONING: DATE PAID: qk., ~~ STRBETLOCAnONOFPROPEllTY: jD~b &~ \~ S6R~L 5~--r LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PllOPEllTY: A"1T"A(.\oo\~~ SIZE OF PARCEL(S): PROPBllTYOWNEll: )J.cNt) "t\f.1'S~J PHONE': J,5\-~ - er\}\ FEE OWNER: k..\t!r'f'C +\f\ ~ ~ ADDRESS: \~~ ~~EL. APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY: V FEE OW'NE.1 CONTllACT PU1lCHASEll LEASE HOWEll 0PI10N TO PURCHASE DESCIUPTION OF REQUJ;ST' ~~W \...~T UNE se "\t\J\, ~6n\ h.<<.n:) C~~J..S A. \~) l-UWE E&U~~ 1..~l:. ~, r~l{TfV,;.f.. "Nt> EcQU~ tl~ER~u... ~~E "f:'~\f).6E. REASON FOR REQUEST: To \~~.;"'El1-0U\ \...b,. $~\Il.~ "Wi:) 'aI;:HE..~ ,~. By payia& die ~ IIIIIed roe. I ......-..4 dIlIlllO .... will be -- ill filii or in .... . .., time, evm iflbe CJIItc:onIe II datial. s~ 112001 ~~ ~'\.Ca~ Sipdure of Property Owner ER\oo; f~ ~~~ ~u.. II J."j IN- ~ h\l\\\''''1=\\..\... \\~" -f/~ b\~ ~11A//I/J / - ~1$lcs,1i~ ~ 1li5\.P~ Signature of Appticant ~lW~1 Date ceNTERVIL.l.E. MN 3~ tervi[[e 'Estabfisfied 1857 1880 :Main Street, CenteJ'Viffe, 9Il:K 55038 651-429-3232 ur 'F~ 651-429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #07-0_ A RESOLUTION SCHEDULING PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER VACATION OF EASEMENTS WHEREAS, it has been proposed to vacate the following described easements: Public easements of record on or across the following property: Lots 7, 8 and that part of Lot 9, Block 12, lying west of the east 120 Feet; Lot 12 and that part of Lots 4 and 6, Block 13, lying east of the west 20 Feet; that part of the vacated 2nd Street lying southerly of a line drawn from the northwest comer of Block 12 to the northeast comer of Block 13 and north of a line drawn from the southwest comer of Lot 9, Block 12, to the southeast comer of Lot 4, Block 13; All in the plat of CENTERVILLE, Anoka County, Minnesota, and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CENTERVll..LE, MINNESOTA, 1) That the Council will consider vacating such easements at a public hearing to be held at 6:30 p.m. on December 12, 2007 at the Council Chambers of City Hall. 2) The City Clerk shall give such mailed and published notice as required by law. Adopted by the City Council ofCenterville this _ day of November, 2007. Mary Capra, Mayor Attest: Teresa Bender, City Clerk 33 E:x~~T p}?MJJWT~S ()}? A~~~(jo}?'I'~;> ..........;..> CITY COuNCIL OF THE. crtvoF CENTERVILLE;MINNESOTA HELD: November 14,2007 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City . otCenterviHe,Minnesota wasrlulycalled and held at the City Hall in saiClChy 'ontlle 14th day of November, 2007, at 6:30 o'clock PM. The following members were present: and the following were absent: Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #07-0 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSAL ON THE SALE OF $2,600,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2007A, PROVIDING FOR THEIR ISSUANCE AND PLEDGING FOR THE SECURITY THEREOF CERTAIN REVENUES. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE (the "City") AS FOLLOWS: A. WHEREAS, the City has authority pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, to issue its general obligation improvement bonds to finance the construction of public improvement projects within the City; and B. WHEREAS, the City desires to finance the construction. of various public improvement projects listed on Exhibit B to this Resolution (collectively, the "Project"), which - improvement projects have been combined into a single improvement for fmancing purposes, through the issuance of its general obligation bonds pursuant to Mimiesota Statutes, section 429.091 and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475; and C. WHEREAS, the City determines and declares that it is necessary and desirable to issue its General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2007 A (the "Bonds") in a principal amount of $2,600,000 to finance its costs of constructing the Project; and ~. -' D. WHEREAS, the City has solicited proposals to purchase the bonds pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60; and E. WHEREAS, the proposals set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto were received by the City; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City as follows: 1. Sale of Bonds; Purpose. 1. 0 1. The proposal of (the Purchaser") to purchase the Bonds (or individually, a "Bond") in accordance with the terms established for the Bonds, at the rates of interest hereinafter set forth, and to pay therefore the sum of $ , plus interest accrued to the date of delivery of the Bonds, is hereby found, determined and declared to be the most favorable proposal received and is hereby accepted, and the Bonds are hereby awarded to said Purchaser. 1.02. The Bonds shall be titled "General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2007 A", shall be dated December 11, 2007, as the date of original issue and shall be issued forthwith on or after such date as fully registered bonds. The City assumes no obligation for the assignment or printing of CUSIP numbers on the Bonds or for the correctness of any CUSIP numbers printed thereon. The City will permit such numbers to be printed on the Bonds at the expense of the Purchaser, provided, that the City shall not be responsible for any delay in delivery of the Bonds occasioned thereby. The Bonds shall be numbered from R-l upward in the denomination of $5,000 each or in any integral multiple thereof of a single maturity (the "Authorized Denominations"). The Bonds shall mature on June 1 in the years and amounts as follows; Year Amount Year Amount 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $140,000 $145,000 $150,000 $155,000 $165,000 $170,000 $175,000 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $185,000 $195,000 $205,000 $215,000 $220,000 $235,000 $245,000 1.03. The Bonds shall provide funds to finance the cost of constructing the Project. 1.04. The Bonds shall bear interest payable semiannually on June 1 and December 1 of each year (each, an "Interest Payment Date") commencing on June 1, 2008, calculated on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months and will be rounded pursuant to rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, at the respective rates per annum set forth opposite the maturity years as follows: 2 Year Rate Year 'Ra:te 2010 % 2017 % 2011 % 2018 % 2012 % 2019 % 2013 % 2020 % 2014 % 2021 % 2015 % 2022 % 2016 % 2023 % Net Effective Interest Rate: % Section 2. Book Entry Only System. The Depository Trust Company, a limited purpose trust company organized under the laws of the State of New York, or any of its successors or its successors to its functions hereunder (the "Depository"), will act as securities depository for, the Bonds, and to this end: (a) The Bonds shall be initially issued and, so long as they remain in book entry form only (the "Book Entry Only Period"), shall at all times be in the form of a separate single fully registered Bond for each maturity of the Bonds; and for purposes of complying with this requirement under Section 6, Authorized Denominations for any Bond shall be deemed to be limited during the Book Entry Only Period to the outstanding principal amount of that Bond. (b) Upon initial issuance, ownership of the Bonds shall be registered in a bond register maintained by the Registrar (as hereinafter defined) in the name of Cede & Co., as the nominee (it or any nominee of the existing or a successor Depository, the "Nominee"). (c) With respect to the Bonds, neither the City nor the Registrar shall have any responsibility or obligation to any broker, dealer, bank, or any other financial institution for which the Depository holds Bonds as securities depository, (the "Participant") or the person for which a Participant holds an interest in the Bonds shown on the books and records of the Participant (the "Beneficial Owner"). Without limiting the immediately preceding sentence, neither the City, nor the Registrar, shall have any such responsibility or obligation with respect to (A) the accuracy of the records of the Depository, the Nominee or any Participant with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, or (B) the delivery to any Participant, any Owner or any other person, other than the Depository, of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (C) the payment to any Participant, any Beneficial Owner or any other person, other than the Depository, of any amount with respect to the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds, or (D) the consent given or other action taken by the Depository as the Register~d Holder of any Bonds (the "Holder"). For purposes of securing the vote or consent of any Holder under this Resolution, the City may, however, rely upon an omnibus proxy under which the Depository assigns its consenting or voting rights to certain Participants to whose accounts the Bonds are credited on the record date identified in a listing attached to the omnibus proxy. "'" ~_ -== '~"~-r-.l!e:: :.~'-~,~--~ 3 (d) The City and the Registrar may treat as and deem the Depository to be the absolute owner of the Bonds for the purpose of payment of the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds, for the purpose of giving notices of redemption and other matters with respect to the Bonds, for the purpose of obtaining any consent or other action to be taken by Holders for the purpose of registering transfers with respect to such Bonds, and for all purposes whatsoever. The Registrar, as paying agent hereunder, shall pay all principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or upon the Holder or the Holders of the Bonds as shown on the Bond register, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (e) Upon delivery by the Depository to the Registrar of written notice to the effect that the Depository has determined to substitute a new Nominee in place of the existing Nominee, and subj ect to the transfer provisions in Section 6 hereof, references to the Nominee hereunder shall refer to such new Nominee. (f) So long as any Bond is registered in the name of a Nominee, all payments with respect to the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on such Bond and all notices with respect to such Bond shall be made and given, respectively, by the Registrar or City, as the case may be, to the Depository as provided in the Letter of Representations to the Depository required by the Depository as a condition to its acting as book-entry Depository for the Bonds (said Letter of Representations, together with any replacement thereof or amendment or substitute thereto, including any standard procedures or policies referenced therein or applicable thereto respecting the procedures and other matters relating to the Depository's role as book-entry Depository for the Bonds, collectively hereinafter referred to as the "Letter of Representations"). (g) All transfers of beneficial ownership interests in each Bond issued in book-entry form shall be limited in principal amount to Authorized Denominations and shall be effected by procedures by the Depository with the Participants for recording and transferring the ownership of beneficial interests in such Bonds. (h) In cOlmection with any notice or other communication to be provided to the Holders pursuant to this Resolution by the City or the Registrar with respect to any consent or other action to be taken by Holders, the Depository shall consider the date of receipt of notice requesting such consent or other action as the record date for such consent or other action; provided, that the City or the Registrar may establish a special record date for such conscnt or other action. The City or the Registrar shall, to the extent possible, give the Depository notice of special record date not less than 25 calendar days in advance of such special record date to the extent possible. (i) Any successor Registrar in its written acceptance of its duties under this Resolution and any paying agency/bond registrar agreement, shall agree to take any actions necessary from time to time to comply with the requirements of the Letter of Representations. G) In the case of a partial prepayment of a Bond, the Holder may, in lieu of surrendering the Bond for a Bond of a lesser denomination as provided in Section 6 hereof, make 4 .~ .l}otation of the reduction in principal amount on the panel provided on the Bond stating the amount so redeemed. Section 3. Termination of Book-Entry Only System. Discontinuance of a particular Depository's services and termination of the book-entry only system may be effected as follows: (a) The Depository may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving written notice to the City and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. The City may terminate the services of the Depository with respect to the Bonds if it determines that the Depository is no longer able to carry out its functions as securities depository or the continuation of the system of book-entry transfers through the Depository is not in the best interests of the City or the Beneficial Owners. (b) Upon termination of the services of the Depository as provided in the preceding paragraph, and if no substitute securities depository willing to undertake the functions of the depository hereunder can be found which, in the opinion of the City, is willing and able to assume such functions upon reasonable or customary terms, or if the City determines that it is in the best interests of the City or the Beneficial Owners of the Bonds that the Beneficial Owners be able to obtain certificates for the Bonds, the Bonds shall no longer be registered as being registered in the bond register in the name of the Nominee, but may be registered in whatever name or names the Holder of the Bonds shall designate at that time, in accordance with Section 6 hereof. To the extent that the Beneficial Owners are designated as the transferee by the Holders, in accordance with Section 6 hereof, the Bonds will be delivered to the Beneficial Owners. (c) Nothing in this Section 3 shall limit or restrict the provisions of Section 6 hereof. The City Administrator is authorized and directed to execute in the name of the City the Letter of Representations in substantially the form on file in the office of the City. In the event of the disability or the resignation or other absence of the City Administrator of the City, such other officer of the City who may act in his or her behalf shall without further act or authorization of the City do all things and execute all instruments and documents required to be done or to be executed by such absent or disabled official. The provisions in the Letter of Representations are incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Resolution, and if and to the extent any such provisions are inconsistent with the other provisions of this Resolution, the provisions in the Letter of Representations shall control. Section 4. Redemption. 4.01. At the option of the City, Bonds maturing on or after June 1,2012, shall each be subject to call and prior payment on June 1,2011, or on any date thereafter at a price equal to the p. rincipal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the d8:te of .redernption, Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject to prepayment. If redemption is in part, the selection of the Bonds remaining unpaid to be prepaid shall be at the discretioIl of the City. If only part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are called for prepayment the City will notify the Depository of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. The. Depositol't will d~!e.nnine by lo! the amount of participant's intmesbdn s~h_mClturity- tQ;i:.be _...:~" -~~ --- 5 redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interest in such maturity to be redeemed. (To be used if term bonds are included) 4.02. Bonds maturing in the year(s) (the "Term Bonds") are subject to mandatory redemption on June 1 in the years and principal amounts as follows: Mandatory Redemption Schedule Term Bonds Due Term Bonds Due Redemption (June 1) Redemption (June 1) Amount Amount Term Bonds Due Term Bonds Due Redemption (June 1) Amount Redemption (June 1) Amount or, if less than such amount is then outstanding, an amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds then outstanding. The City may, at its option, to be exercised on or before the thiliieth day preceding any mandatory redemption date specified above deliver to the Registrar written notice which shall (a) specify a principal amount of Term Bonds previously redeemed (otherwise than pursuant to the above Mandatory Redemption Schedule) or purchased and cancelled by the Registrar and not theretofore applied as a credit against any redemption of Term Bonds pursuant to the above Mandatory Redemption Schedule, and (b) instruct the Registrar to apply the principal amount of such Term Bonds so delivered or previously redeemed or purchased and cancelled for credit against the principal installments to be prepaid pursuant to the Mandatory Redemption Schedule. Each such Term Bond so delivered or previously redeemed or purchased and cancelled shall be credited by the Registrar in the order directed by the City at succeeding and future principal installments to be prepaid pursuant to the Mandatory Redemption Schedule. The specific Term Bonds to be redeemed will be selected by lot by the Registrar. All prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. Section 5. Registration and Payment. 5.01. The Bonds shall be issued only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, is payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. 6 5.02. Each Bond shall be dated as of the last interest payment date preceding the date of authentication to which interest on the Bond has been paid or made available for payment, unless (i) the date of authentication is an interest payment date to which interest has been paid or made available for payment, in which case such Bond shall be dated as of the date of authentication, or (ii) the date of authentication is prior to the first Interest Payment Date, in which case such bond shall be dated as of the date of original issue. The interest on the Bonds shall be payable to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the month preceding the interest payment date, whether or not such day is a business day. Section 6. Registration. The City appoints U.S. Bank National Association, St. Paul, Minnesota, as bond registrar and paying agent (the "Registrar"). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at its principal office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of the Bonds and the registration of transfers or exchanges of the Bonds. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of the Bonds duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, dilly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, a new Bond of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each Interest Payment Date and until such Interest Payment Date. (c) Cancellation. The Bonds surrendered upon any transfer shall be promptly canceled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (d) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for its refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (e) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person(s) in whose name(s) the Bonds are at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute=owners__. of the Bonds, whether the Bonds shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of or interest on such Bonds and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owners or upon the owners' order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability of the City upon such Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. 7 (f) Taxes, Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds, the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee, or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (g) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be lost, stolen, or destroyed, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, maturity dates and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for such Bond lost, stolen, or destroyed, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond lost, stolen, or destroyed, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was lost, stolen or destroyed, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance, and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be canceled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, lost, stolen, or destroyed Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms, it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (h) Redemption. In the event the Bonds are called for redemption, if applicable, notice thereof will be given by the Registrar by mailing a copy of the redemption notice by first class mail (postage prepaid) not less than 30 days prior to the date fixed for redemption to the registered owner of the Bonds to be redeemed at the address shown on the registration books kept by the Registrar. Failure to give notice by publication or by mail to any registered owner, or any defect therein, will not affect the validity of any proceeding for the redemption of the Bonds. The Bonds when so called for redemption will cease to bear interest after the specified redemption date, provided that the funds for the redemption are on deposit with the Registrar at the place of payment at the time. Section 7. Execution, Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Clerk of the City and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the manual signatures, or facsimile thereof, of its City Clerk and Mayor. In case any officer whose signature, or a facsimile of 'whose signature, shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Bonds, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if such officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, the Bonds shall not be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bonds has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of Authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on the Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this resolution. When the Bond has been so executed and authenticated, it shall be delivered by the City Clerk or Registrar to the Purchaser thereof upon payment of the purchase price, and the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. Section 8. Temporary Bonds. The City may elect to deliver, in lieu of printed definitive bonds, one or more typewritten temporary bonds in substantially the form set forth in 8 Sectioll.? ,with such, ch~g~tas ,m~r be, ~~cessaI)' tO~,~~ect m.orethap.one ma~ity in ~s~p~le tempoi-ary bond. . Suchtempora.rj. bonds. may be executed With photocopied facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Clerk. Such temporary bonds shall, upon the printing of the defmitive bonds and the execution thereof, be exchanged therefore and canceled. Section 9. Form of Bond. 9.01. The Bonds, together with the Bond Registrar's Certificate of Authentication, the form of Assignment and the registration information thereon, shall be in: substantially the following form: - ~"--- ~<" 9 .~ ~~~ - -~"" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE No. R- GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2007A Rate Maturity Date of Original Issue December 11, 2007 CUSIP No. Registered Owner: Cede & Co., as nominee of the Depository Trust Company, New York, New York Principal Sum: KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that the City of Centerville, Minnesota, a duly organized and existing municipal corporation in Anoka County, Minnesota (the "City") acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the registered owner set forth above, or registered assigns, the principal sum set forth above on the maturity date specified above, and to pay interest thereon from the date hereof at the mlliual rate specified above, payable February 1 and August 1 of each year (each, an "Interest Payment Date") commencing June 1, 2008, (calculated on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months and rounded pursuant to the rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board) to the person in whose name this bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day of the immediately preceding month. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and sUlTender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by U.S. Bank National Association, St. Paul, Mim1esota, Registrar and Paying Agent, or its designated successor under the Resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith, credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. (So long as this Bond is registered in the name of the Depository or its Nominee as provided in the Resolution hereinafter described, and as those terms are defined therein, payment of principal of and interest on this Bond and notice with respect thereto shall be made as provided in the Letter of Representations, as defined in the Resolution, and surrender of this Bond shall not be required for payment of the redemption price upon a partial redemption of this Bond. Until termination of the book-entry only system pursuant to the Resolution, Bonds may only be registered in the name of the Depository or its Nominee.)* * Include only until termination of the book-entry only system under Section 2 hereof. 10 .........". Atthe.opti9~.of the(~ity,B.onds maturing?n ()r after June 1, 2012, shalleachbe subject to call aridpri.or paYment on June 1, 2011, or .on any date thereafter at a price equal t.o the' principal am.ount there.of t.o be redeemed plus interest accrued t.o the date .of redemptiQn. Redempti.on may be in whQle .or in part.of the BQnds subject tQ prepayment. If redemptiQn is in part, the selectiQn .of the BQnds remaining unpaid t.o be prepaid shall be at the discreti.on .of the City. If .only part .of the BQnds having a CQmmQn maturity date are called fQr prepayment the City will nQtify the DepQsitQry .of the particular amQunt .of such maturity tQ be prepaid. The DepQsitQry will determine by lQt the amQunt .of participant's interest in such maturity tQ be redeemed and each participant will then select by lQt the beneficial .ownership interest in such maturity tQ be redeemed. (To be used if term bonds are included) BQnds maturing in the year(s) (the "Term BQnds") are subject tQ mandatQry redemptiQn .on June 1 in the years and principal amQunts as fQllQws: MandatQry RedemptiQn Schedule Term BQnds Due Tenn BQnds Due RedemptiQn (June 1) RedemptiQn (June 1) AmQunt AmQunt Term BQnds Due Tenn BQnds Due RedemptiQn (June 1) AmQunt RedemptiQn (June 1) AmQunt .or, if less than such amQunt is then .outstanding, an amQunt equal tQ the aggregate principal amQunt .of the BQnds then .outstanding. The City may, at its QptiQn, tQ be exercised .on .or befQre the thirtieth day preceding any mandatQry, redemptiQn date specified abQve deliver tQ the Registrar written nQtice which shall (a) specify a principal amQunt .of Term BQnds previQusly redeemed (.otherwise than pursuant tQ the abQve MandatQry RedemptiQn Schedule) .or purchased and cancelled by the Registrar and nQt theretQfQre applied as a credit against any redemptiQn .of Term BQnds pursuant tQ the abQve MandatQry RedemptiQn Schedule, and (b) instruct the Registrar tQ apply the principal amQunt .of such Term BQnds SQ delivered .or previQusly redeemed .or purchased and cancelled fQr credit against the principal installments tQ be prepaid pursuant tQ the MandatQry RedemptiQn Schedule. Each such Term BQnd SQ delivered .or previQusly redeemed .or purchased and cancelled shall be credited by the Registrar in the .order directed by the City at succeeding and future principal installments tQ be prepaid pursuant tQ the MandatQry RedemptiQn Schedule. 11 The specific Term Bonds to be redeemed will be selected by lot by the Registrar. All prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. The City Council of the City has designated the Bonds as "qualified tax exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b )(3) of the Internal Revenue code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), relating to disallowance of interest expense for financial institutions and within the $10 million limitation allowed by the Code for the calendar year of issue. This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $2,600,000 all of like original issue date and tenor, except as to number, maturity date, and interest rate, all issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council of the City on November 14, 2007 (the "Resolution"), for the purpose of providing funds to finance various public improvement projects within the City pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota. Pursuant to the Resolution, the City has pledged to the payment of this Bond revenues derived from the payment of special assessments levied against properties benefited by the above-described public improvements and certain other revenues. The full faith and credit of the City are irrevocably pledged for payment of this Bond and the City Council has obligated itself to levy ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the City in the event of any deficiency in revenues pledged, which taxes may be levied without limitation as to rate or amount. The Bonds of this series are issued only as fully registered bonds in Authorized Denominations (as defined in the Resolution described above). As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner's attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither thc City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. This Bond is not valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon has been executed by the Bond Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts, conditions, and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to have happened, and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond have been done, have happened, and have been performed in regular and due form, time, and manner as required by 12 .1.~'.V; and. tha~thi~. Bond~ to&eth~r ""ith.~l?tl1er ind~RtecIp.esspfthe Sity outstandip.g oI1.th~. date. hereof aiidon the daJe of ltsaCtual issuance and delivery~"does not cause the' indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation thereon. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed by the manual signatures, or facsimiles thereof, of the Mayor and the City Clerk and has caused this Bond to be dated December 11, 2007. City Clerk Mayor 13 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. u.s. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION By: Authorized Representative (Form of certificate to be printed on each Bond, following a full copy of the legal opinion.) It is certified that the original opinion, of which the foregoing is a true and correct copy, is on file in the office of the , and is dated as of the date of delivery of the Bonds and payment therefore by the original purchaser. City Clerk 14 ABBREVIATIONS The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: UTMA -- (Cust) TEN COM -- as tenants in common TEN ENT -- as tenants by entireties JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common as custodian for (Minor) Uniform Transfers to Minors Act under the (State) ::=--_.:w-" -~- -- - 'li. ~_ "~-4"""-~-.~ - '- :=f~' -':~-_' 15 ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ("Transferor"), the undersigned, hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto (Social Security or Federal Employer Identification No. ) the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitute and appoints ("Transferee") as attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises; provided, however, that if any default with respect to the Bond shall have occurred to or to the date of this transfer, the within Bond shall not be registered and the Transferee shall be entitled to receive payment with respect to the within Bond upon presentation thereof as assignee of the Transferor. Date: NOTICE: No transfer will be registered and no new Bond will be issued in the name of the Transferee, unless the signature( s) to this assignment correspond(s) with the name(s) as it (they) appear(s) upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatever and the Social Security or Federal Employer Identification numbers of the settlor and beneficiaries of the trust, the date of the trust and the name of the trustee should be supplied. Signature Guaranteed: NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a member firm of the New York Stock Exchange or a commercial baIlie or a trust company or any other "Eligible Guarantor Institution" as defined in 17 CFR 240.17 Ad-15 (a) (2) 16 9.0~. The City Administrator of the City shall oi>tain a copy of the proposed approving legal opinion of Bradley & Deike, P.A., Edina, Minnesota; which shall be complete except as to dating thereof and shall cause the opinion to be printed on each Bond, together with a certificate to be signed by the facsimile signature of the City Clerk in substantially the form set forth in the form of Bond. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificate in the name of the City upon receipt of such opinion and to file the opinion in the City's offices. Section 10. Funds and Accounts. There is hereby created a special fund to be designated the "General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2007 A Fund" (the "Fund") to be administered and maintained by the City Finance Director as a bookkeeping account separate and apart from all other funds maintained in the official financial records of the City. The Fund shall be maintained in the manner herein specified until all of the Bonds and the interest thereon have been fully paid. There shall be maintained in the Fund two (2) separate accounts, to be designated the "Construction Account" and "Debt Service Account" respectively. 10.01 Proiect Account. To the Construction Account there shall be credited an amount of the proceeds of the Bonds necessary to pay the City's costs of issuance of the Bonds and constructing the Project. After payment of all such costs, any Bond proceeds remaining on hand in the Construction Account shall be transferred to the Debt Service Account. 10.02. Debt Service Account. There shall be maintained a Debt Service Account to be designated the "Debt Service Account". There are hereby irrevocably appropriated and pledged to, and there shall be credited to the Debt Service Account: (1) any proceeds of the Bonds not used to pay the City's costs of constructing the Project or other improvement projects or to pay the cost of issuance of the Bonds; and (2) general fund moneys and tax levy receipts in each year sufficient to pay the debt service due on the Bonds in each year; and (3) special assessment receipts and fees and charges pledged pursuant to section 11 of this Resolution. The moneys in the Debt Service Account shall be used solely to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds until such Bonds are paid in full. No portion of the proceeds of the Bonds shall be used directly or indirectly to acquire higher yielding investments or to replace funds which were used directly or indirectly to acquire higher yielding investments, except (1) for a reasonable temporary period until such proceeds are needed for the purpose for which the Bonds were issued and (2) in addition to the above, in an amount not greater than the lesser of five percent (5%) of the proceeds of the Bonds, or $100,000. To this effect, any proceeds of the Bonds and any sums from time to time held in the Project Account, or Debt Service Account (or any other City account which will be used to pay principal or interest to become due on the bonds payable therefrom) in excess of amounts which under then-applicable federal arbitrage regulations may be invested without regard to yield shall not be invested at a yield in excess of the applicable yield restrictions imposed by said arbitrage regulations on such investments after taking into account any applicable "temporary periods" or "minor portion" made available under the federal arbitrage regulations. Money in the fund shall not be invested in obligations or deposits issued by, guaranteed by or insured by the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof if and to the extent that such investment would cause the Bonds-to be "federally guaranteed" within the meaning of Section 149(b) of the federal Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). 17 Section 11. Assessments; Tax Levy. A. The Bonds are payable in part from the proceeds of special assessments (the "Assessments") levied or to be levied against properties benefited by the Project. The City hereby covenants and agrees that, for the payment of the cost of the Project, the City has done or will do and perform all acts and things necessary for the final and valid levy of special assessments in an amount not less than 20% of the costs of each of the improvements financed by the Bonds. It is estimated that collections of the Assessments will be as shown on Exhibit C attached hereto. In the event any such assessment shall at any time be held invalid with respect to any lot or tract of land, due to any error, defect or irregularity in any action or proceeding taken or to be taken by the City or by the City Council or by any of the officers or employees of the City, either in the making of such assessment or in the performance of any condition precedent thereto, the City hereby covenants and agrees that it will forthwith do all such further things and take all such further proceedings as shall be required by law to make such assessment a valid and binding lien upon said propeliy. Collections of special assessments shall be deposited in the Debt Service Account or Construction Account as directed by the City Council. Section 11. Security; Tax Levv. A. The Bonds are payable from the proceeds of special assessments (the "Assessments") levied or to be levied against properties benefited by the Project. The City hereby pledges to apply the proceeds of the Assessments to the payment of the Bonds. B. Tax Levy; Coverage Test; Cancellation of Certain Tax Levies. To provide moneys for payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds there is hereby levied upon all of the taxable property in the City a direct annual ad valorem tax which shall be spread upon the tax rolls and collected with and as part of other general propeliy taxes in the City for the years and in the amounts as follows: Year of Tax Levy Year of Tax Collection Amount See attached Exhibit C The tax levies are such that if collected in full they, together with special assessments and other revenues herein pledged for the payment of the Bonds, will produce at least five percent (5%) in excess of the amount needed to meet when due the principal and interest payments on the Bonds. The tax levies shall be irrepealable so long as any of the Bonds are outstanding and unpaid, provided, that the City reserves the right and power to reduce the levies in the manner and to the extent permitted by Mimlesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3. Section 12. Defeasance. When all Bonds have been discharged as provided in this paragraph, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this Resolution to the registered holders of the Bonds shall, to the extent permitted by law, cease. The City may discharge its 18 ?k!ig~potlswitll !espect toany Bonds which are due on any dateby irrevocaklydepositing with the Bond Registrar on or before that date a suin sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Bond Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. If applicable, the City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bonds called for redemption on any date when they are prepayable according to their terms, by depositing with the Bond Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full, provided that notice of redemption thereof has been duly given. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a suitable banking institution qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities described in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67, Subdivision 8, bearing interest payable at such times and at such rates and maturing on such dates as shall be required, subject to sale and/or reinvestment, to pay all amounts to become due thereon to maturity or, if notice of redemption as herein required has been duly provided for, to such earlier redemption date. Section 13. General Obligation Pledge. For the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as the same respectively become due, the full faith, credit and taxing powers of the City shall be and are hereby irrevocably pledged. If the balance in the Debt Service Account is ever insufficient to pay all principal and interest then due on the Bonds payable therefrom, the deficiency shall be promptly paid out of any other accounts of the City which are available for such purpose, and such other funds may be reimbursed from the Debt Service Account when a sufficient balance is available therein. Section 14. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the purchaser of the Bonds and to Bradley & Deike, P. A., Bond Counsel, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates, and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the Issuer as to the facts recited therein. The officers of the City are also hereby authorized to execute continuing disclosure certificate to satisfy rules of the federal Securities Exchange Commission. Section 15. Certificate of Registration. The City Administrator is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor of Anoka County, Minnesota, together with such other information as he or she shall require, and to obtain the County Auditor's Certificate that the bonds have been entered in the County Auditor's Bond Register. Section 16. Tax Covenants. 16.01. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue 19 Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder (the "Regulations"), in effect at the time of such actions, and that it will take or cause its officers, employees or agents to take, all affirmative action within its power that may be necessary to ensure that such interest will not become subject to taxation under the Code and applicable Regulations, as presently existing or as hereafter amended and made applicable to the Bonds. 16.02. The City will comply with requirements necessary under the Code to establish and maintain the exclusion from gross income of the interest on the Bonds under Section 103 of the Code, including, without limitation, requirements relating to temporary periods for investments, limitations on amounts invested at a yield greater than the yield on the Bonds, and the rebate of excess investment earnings to the United States. 16.03. The City further covenants not to use the proceeds of the Bonds or to cause or permit them or any of them to be used, in such a manner as to cause the Bonds to be "private activity bonds" within the meaning of Section 103 and 141 through 150 of the Code. 16.04. In order to qualify the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b )(3) of the Code, the City makes the following factual statements and representations: (a) the Bonds are not "private activity bonds" as defined in Section 141 ofthe Code; (b) the City hereby designates the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; (c) the reasonably anticipated amount of tax-exempt obligations (other than private activity bonds, treating qualified 501(c)(3) bonds as not being private activity bonds) which will be issued by the City (and all subordinate entities of the City) during calendar year 2007 will not exceed $10,000,000; and (d) not more than $10,000,000 of obligations issued by the City during calendar year 2007 have been designated for purposes of Section 265(b )(3) of the Code. 16.06. The City certifies that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used by the City to reimburse itself for any expenditure with respect to the Project which the City paid or will have paid more than 60 days prior to the issuance of the Bonds unless, with respect to such prior expenditures, the City shall have made a declaration of official intent which complies with the provisions of Section 1.150-2 of the Regulations, except with respect to certain de minimis expenditures meeting the requirements of Section 1. 150-2(f)(1 ) and preliminary expenditures meeting the requirements of Section 1. 150-2(f)(2) which in the aggregate do not exceed 20% of the "issue price" of the Bonds. 16.07. The City will use its best efforts to comply with any federal procedural requirements which may apply in order to effectuate the designations made by this section. 20 Section 17. Payment of Issuance Expenses. of the Bonds from the proceeds ofthe Bonds. The City will pay costs of issuance Section 18. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution shall be held or deemed to be or shall, in fact, be inoperative or unenforceable as applied in any particular case in any jurisdiction or jurisdictions or in all jurisdictions or in all cases because it conflicts with any provisions of any constitution or statute or rule or public policy, or for any other reason, such circumstances shall not have the effect of rendering the provision in question inoperative or unenforceable in any other case or circumstance, or of rendering any other provision or provisions herein contained invalid, inoperative or unenforceable to any extent whatever. The invalidity of anyone or more phrases, sentences, clauses or paragraphs in this Resolution contained shall not affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or any part thereof. Section 19. Headings. Headings in this Resolution are included for convenience of reference only and are not a part hereof, and shall not limit or define the meaning of any provisions hereof. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by council member Weston and, after a full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 21 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ANOKA ) SS CITY OF CENTERVILLE ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Centerville, Minnesota, hereby certify that I have carefully compared and attached the foregoing extract of minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City held November 14, 2007, with the original thereof on file and of record in my office and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to the considering of proposals for and awarding the sale of $2,600,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2007 A, of said City. WITNESS my hand this ~ day of ,2007. City Clerk 1. Fairview Street Improvements 2. Old Mill Road Improvements 3. CSAH 14 Improvements EXHIBIT B Projects Special Assessments and Levy Calculation tervi{{e 'L.o;tabfishcd 1&':;7 1880 :Main Street, Centeroiffe, :MW 55038 651-429-3232 or <FaJ( 651-429-8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION #07-0_ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL GRANT APPLICATION TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WHEREAS, the City of Centerville would like to improve the crossing of Anoka County CSAB #14 near Centerville Elementary School~ and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation is soliciting applications for the Safe Routes to School Grant Program to improve pedestrian travel to schools~ and NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AND KNOWN TO ALL, that the City of Centerville authorizes the submission of an application for grant funds to improve pedestrian travel to Centerville Elementary School with the construction of an underpass under Anoka County CSAB # 14 near Dupre Road. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council this 14th day of November, 2007. Mayor, Mary Capra Attest: City Clerk, Teresa Bender 41 ---- - ~~. ,,-- ~~-=-- - ---~--"' SCHOOL CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA CENTENNIAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CENTERVILLE CSAH 14/DUPRE ROAD UNDERPASS Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application .c-~ ....- ~6 1 Table of Contents SRTS Application Checklist Sections and Appendixes: . Section 1: Project Area Maps · Section 2: Description of Current Biking and Walking Conditions in the Project Area and Demonstration of Need . Section 3: Describe Proposed Infrastructure Improvement(s) . Section 4: Describe Proposed Non-Infrastructure Program(s) . Section 5: Stakeholder Concurrence and Support, and Additional Funding Sources . Section 6: Project Timeline . Section 7: Estimated Budget . Section 8: Application Signature(s) . Appendix A - Photographs of Current Safety Hazards . Appendix B - Safety Hazards Data Sources · Appendix C - Centennial Elementary School Centerville Walking Map . Appendix D - Proposed Improvements . Appendix E - Stakeholders Letters of Support . Appendix F - Public Transit Information Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application 2 3!e Minnesota Department of Transportation SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 2008 GRANT APPLlCA TION WORKSHEET ..1.'.'........... ~ ...~<:#1 ~~ <lI!)' SCIIOIJL Centennial Elementary School Centerville CSAH 14 Safe Crossing Construction of a underpass to safely cross CSAH 14 in Centerville from residential neighborhoods to the Centennial Elementary School. CSAH 14 and Dupre Road in Centerville, Minnesota Infrastructure Safe route plan development 0 Safety audit Detailed engineering 0 Crosswalk guard training studies/documents Street crossing safety 0 Education program improvements Filling gaps in bike/ped network 0 Promotional Events Creating net ped/bike way 0 Enforcement Traffic calming 0 Public awareness campaign Signing 0 Safe walking, bus or bike training Bike parking ~ Education programs to teach safe walking/bike to school Other 0 Other 1880 Main Street Doug Fischer County Engineer 1440 Bunker lake Blvd NW Centerville, MN 55038 651-429-3232 651-429-8629 Andover, MN 55304 763-862-4213 763-862-4201 jmeyer@centervillemn.com doug. fischer@co.anoka.mn.us Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application 3 31 Centennial Public Schools , I Biking/walking discouraged Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application 4 3f HIGH VOUJIlIE COLLECTOR ROADS EXISlING PEDESTRIAN ROUTES PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN ROUTES n Sonestluo 8'=::'. 11J' As.s'OcIIIftIs l!illl' ... . AdNIat:IIt Section 1: Project Area Maps MAP 1: Current a~d Potential Walking and Bicycling Routes [I "Lt.. \ j ~U/.A ~ \ ~"" 'P 'r:IFD.\-1.' A ~ 7T~'" ~ ~ A '(r./J ~~~ ------ --=....... ,\t: ~ ELa- '1l "\ aamo&. - ~ I ~~ ~t: J ~~~I~ : ~~,. ; "' H . ~ HIES - ^ EHEE \"" J I-- I-- 'I II ...... c. " D # ,t CUlIUlIIn' - ,# , =/ it :11../ ~ f II --.. ...... 'I oN -..- At/L '- .-Jl ~ ':./ f ~ ~w [,I I I L ';.( 'J ~, ~, : - ~ ~ > ["" ; ~ J j I- ._........-.-.-1 f, .. ,'1'- ~ I ,a ~f \,. III L\. '\. /,,<#' rn ,... 1!4 r", r...l.ll/\J:I ~ll "" I,I#";""",~,,, ~ ;:0- ..... )I ~... , ,.,. , "" L U ~ ,~ r(. "'I~ ,~~ ~ ,1. ~ ~J_':!I ffl,_!~~t~f:d!!!IlIIl ~...,.t'"" 1 Y <""" T I J, h ~ ~""I\.f. T I u.ll i ""IiI 'I...L j' ;' LO'~^ ,,~ ....:.f ~ .\ "'~::1 ,~ ~ ~~~t=i r:l n~ , I ~ ~ io'"\ i'o.V " I A .U' ... JV t:: ""Ar CL, ~ c,j ./ Illf ! i ....... ....- ....- L .. _1lI_ '" MAP 1 EXISllNG AND PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN ROUTES ~ .~1IIlIlHIf'Il-_....... "..1'1_ Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application f '," -, 1 .- t!lJ ;:.:::- ~[ -, I -...'" -'-"-- , -. " i 1 ! " l' ,] i.... I--- L.. ..,..~ ~ .A #" h/' I J~ MAP 2: Posted speeds and all traffic control devices along current and proposed school routes . -- A_ JI/''' .p- t:: ~ :L / ~ I , If I 30 MPH -46MPH ~~Il ,&11'. t ~ ~ Vi" IIf r ......If ~t.... \\ ~.p ~ "\'::.>..' 1111 :....... .. ~ ilt\U. - -...:j · ~~';.~& /: '.~* ~ L.../ T' ~~,A ..R:-t [Ill .. y/ ,~..)" w::c - III Ir ~ ,\\- t- ,.... u: I- .... H 83m --=---\r1 ~ ::l ~ EHB3 ACfIDOL 1\ .I . L.,J ~ ..J.. j ~~ dI-~ ~h< -..J1 ~ R\ -:- I I~"'- \~ T~ ~::-<?5 I I II ~r l::I= I I [: U 1 ,~ f;"~ ~~ ~j:;: ~r- ~ ~ :fIlm t: H '.1J mn ~ ...., T W ...r- J, -~ n t;l p I ~'" "\ I "..... - I :n 1111 jJ::.'j rr ~ ..............." .. .l: ... l- . .. I- ~ I- .. /.,A I ! "I ",. ;;)./ ../ . I , ;- ~ 41H ,. 1. t:t ~ U '"'" k 1. .IJ L :::: L :-.._ J\..... t ~_ ':f' ~ A 'rC ~ 7, ..,.. ..., J"'I4.v ;"I'll:!!. II > ("""-- M W\\. j.-..{ . 'L~ ~ ...L " ~;o~ l_~):: m~^3 ~ tf5J E ~ r ~ lit ~ ~Il -oJ s Q: ~ n~ I I I ! I t) 2-WAY STOP o 4-WAY STOP L .. _Ill... '\00 .. ;.- "lCSAittJ 1--[ 1--, , t-- 11/ ~..#~ '~".--... . J I--- I" &n9'lb: 'd- ~ A'" # ....-- ~ 8one5troo -=-~ ",. Anderl/l( . .1J. A1IsDt::IIIles afti..... . ~ MAP 2 EXISTING SPEED UMITS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL '\jI.....,..~_lIlI1IAlt ~ _ PIlI m Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application 6 1!J Section 2: Description of Current Biking and Walking Conditions in the Project Area and Demonstration of Need (Maximum three pages) . Please answer the following questions to provide evaluators with a detailed understanding of the location. a) Provide a brief history of the neighborhood traffic issues that provides some context and background for the project. The Centerville Centennial Elementary School is located just north of Anoka County State Aid Highway 14 (CSAH 14). CSAH 14 is a very busy road (8,500+ Vehicles Per Day) and the majority of the elementary students in Centerville must cross this road to get to the school. The crossing of this road is only controlled at Centerville Road with a four way stop sign. The growth that is occurring in Centerville is south of CSAH 14 which will just add to the potential for accidents involving students. b) What are the current risks and obstacles to walking and bicycling to and from the school? The primary risk and obstacle to walking and bicycling to Centerville Centennial Elementary School is the safe crossing of CSAH 14. CSAH 14 serves as a connection between 135E and 135W in east central Anoka County. This route is heavily traveled by commuters. Unfortunately, these commuting patterns coincide with students attempting to cross to the Elementary School. A 25 mile per hour school zone flasher is in place but parents and school officials have discouraged students from walking or biking to school because of the hazards that exist. c) Identify documented safety hazards within the proposed project boundaries, using quantitative data, such as accident data (most current 5 years available), traffic counts, bike and pedestrian counts, demographics, community and school surveys or audits, speed limits. POOjECT AREA OA TA - MAlN STREET AND DUPRE ROAD CENTENNIAL. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CENTERVllLE SPEED UMIT 30 .45 MPH Traffic Counts at M..in $:reet and Traffic [ncidents AccidenlS Pilterson TraH ElementaJy OIl Main Strut on Main fie. Dupre R1>>d School ~ (1) Sttm(1) (2) Chiklrwl (3) 13,100 Total ?opub'cion In Pfllj+ot Area (3) ~ em~ SehooI T 0lllI Within Walking Enn::4ment (4) Dl5tllnce (4) Yur 2030 200e 200e 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 T<<at alS 310 1.&60 I} 1,549 18 1.302 HI 8.523 l,n.. 18 1.07'6 21 148 372 6.9Q3 82 (I) Cen\lennlaI! Lak" F'lll~ Oepa/tment Report (2) July 2. 2004 CSAH 14 TraMe Stu<tt $RF Consulting Group. 11'10. (3} 2000 c.n-. \.I$Slfta\.ld~~ SIDek ..Oata (4) Cen\lennlaI! PublIo Schocl.. Enro1Imtm1 RItpOlt Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application 7 41 d) How and by whom have unsafe routes been identified (e.g., councilor board resolution, agency's plan, etc.)? This unsafe route was jointly identified by the school district, the city and the Centennial Lakes Police Department. e) Given that unsafe routes may exist in numerous locations in your jurisdiction, explain why the selected routes have been targeted for improvements. Describe the magnitude of the risks facing children who walk or bicycle to schools. Centerville is fortunate to have the majority of the city served by bike/walking trails. These trails were constructed as part of new subdivisions developed in the past 10 years. Two primary unsafe routes exist in Centerville. One route is the crossing of CSAH 14 at Dupre Road and the second is at CSAH 14 and Brian Drive. The Dupre Road crossing was selected for funding solicitation because it is presently the crossing where there is the greatest risk of injury; the location where it is the most difficult to spot a crossing pedestrian; where the youngest population cross; where greatest number of pedestrian crossings occur; and, as the city continues to grow, where the new young pedestrians would cross. The magnitude to the risks at this location by children who walk or bicycle to Centennial Elementary School Centerville is a consequence of the change in the speed limit from 30 to 45 mph, visibility, the number of children that cross at this location and the volume of traffic that passes this crossing. In addition, Anoka County is proposing to reconstruct CSAH 14 in 2007, adding a wider road section and creating a more hazardous situation than currently exists. The county project does provide the opportunity to complete the underpass prior to the road reconstruction. f) Are the existing and proposed facilities compliant with the American's with Disabilities Act? Existing and proposed are and will be compliant with the American's with Disabilities Act. g) Describe any existing programs at the affected school(s) that educate students or otherwise encourage walking or bicycling to school. No program exists because of current safety concerns. However with the addition of an underpass, the school will consider an educational program to encourage walking and bicycling to school. h) List or describe any related policies, practices, or documents, such as a school route plan, that demonstrate an overall strategic plan for traffic safety improvements specifically targeted for the school site or school district. The school discourages walking/bicycling to school and, because of safety concerns, the district's policy identifies walk areas north of CSAH 14 only. i) If worksheet item "Requirement (distance from home to school) to be eligible to ride a bus" was checked as "varies", please provide more detail. Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application 8 -17- Provide the following data for each affected roadway: Roadway or Roadway Number Width of Current Projected Intersection Type of lanes Shoulder Average Average Name (City, or Daily Traffic Daily Traffic County or parking (20 year) State) lanes CSAH 14 & Dupre CSAH 2 0 8,523 13,700 Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application 9 13 Section 3: Describe Proposed Infrastructure Improvement(s) Using the information provided in sections One and Two, identify and describe the proposed infrastructure improvements(s). a) Describe the proposed improvements(s) and how it will solve the identified problem. Use the following guidelines to provide a detailed description. If it will help, describe and define the scope of the improvements, provide pictures, diagrams, exhibits, or maps as attachments The proposed infrastructure constructs an underpass under CSAH 14 at Dupre Road. . How does the proposed project correct or improve pedestrian/bicycle traffic safety at or near the project site, especially in reducing child injuries and fatalities? The proposed project eliminates the traffic safety concerns and potential child injuries and fatalities related to crossing CSAH 14 by providing an underpass for access to the elementary school. . If applicable, describe how the proposed solution improves traffic safety for other users of the facility or system. Because the underpass will become a component of the walking/bicycling trail system of the city and county, other users will benefit from the project. . Will the improvements enable or encourage walking along the route(s) for other than school trips? The underpass and its benefit to safety will result in enabling walking along this route for reasons in addition to school trips. These reasons include walking to downtown businesses; to the church; to the senior housing center; to Centerville Lake; to the Rice Creek Regional Park; to local employers; to the public transit stop (route 275); and, to residential neighborhoods. b) Has the proposed improvement been developed in coordination with an existing or planned Safe Routes to School plan or Transportation Improvement Plan? No formal document. c) Describe how you plan to monitor and evaluate the success of your program. The change in schools policies encouraging walking/biking to school, the number of students walking/bicycling to school and the number of walkers/bikers traveling on the city trail system. d) How will the community maintain the proposed facility? Monthly the underpass will be inspected and cleaned Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application ;/;/ Section 4: Describe Proposed Non-Infrastructure Program(s) Using the information provided in sections One and Two, identify and describe the proposed non-infrastructure solution(s). a) Provide a detailed description of the proposed project and how it will improve and promote biking and walking to school. Use the following guidelines to provide a detailed description. . How does the proposed project encourage increased bicycling and walking to school? Yes . How does the proposed project improve the pedestrian/bicycle traffic safety at or near the school? Yes . What program at the school or in the community does your project build on? Revises school policy from discouraging to encouraging walking/bicycling to school by using the underpass to cross CSAH 14. . Non-Infrastructure: Which of the following best describes current safety/education/encouragement programs in your school(s) n I am not aware of any basic ped/bike safety programs delivered to X . students in the past 2 years n We sponsored a ped/bike safety program within the past 2 years n We sponsored a ped/bike safety program within the last year n It is our policy to sponsor a ped/bike safety program anually b) How will ongoing costs be accommodated in the future? City budget c) Describe how you plan to monitor and evaluate the success of your program. Number of student biking/walking to school before the activity compared to the number of students biking/walking to school after the activity. Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application 11 ,rj~ Section 5: Stakeholder Concurrence and Support, and Additional Funding Sources Sa) Provide information on community support for the project. Identify all project partners and the role(s) they played in the development of this proposal. Identify organizations that have pledged their support of the project. Potential project partners may include school officials, local traffic engineers, law enforcement agencies, public health agencies, school-based associations, local elected officials, local businesses and other community groups. Organization Role Contact Name & Title Centennial Lakes Police Pledged Support Robert Makela, Chief ISO #12 Pledged Support Michael Hughes, Transit Director Attach no more than one letter of support or resolution from each organization listed above. Support letters should be addressed to the project manager, not Mn/DOT. Include these letters as attachments to the application. Letters of support submitted after the published Mn/DOT submission deadline will not be accepted or considered in the project evaluation. Do not submit or attach individual student survey sheets or petitions. Narratives and summaries of the surveys or petitions are acceptable. 5b) Additional funding sources: This information is requested if your project is using SRTS money as part of a larger funding package. Source Amount Status City of Centerville $282,000.00 Secured Describe how each funding source will contribute to the project's success. The City Of Centerville's commitment provides the balance of funding needed to construct the underpass. Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application 12 ~6 Section 6: Project Timeline (Maximum 2 pages.) All projects are required to submit a time line covering the period from when the project is authorized by Mn/DOT to the project's completion. 6a) Infrastructure Projects 2008 September Notified of Successful Grant Application October Prepare Pre-Authorization Documents Environmental Document (PM or EA) Nov.-Dec. Agency Review of Environmental Document 2009 January FHWA authorizes design February - March Preliminary Survey and Construction Documents Preparation March Cooperative Agreement. Permit Applications. Plans to MNDOT April - May DSAE and SALT Review June Final Plan Changes July Bidding August Open Bids Sept - October Construction Nov.-Dec. Project Close-out. 6b) Non - Infrastructure Projects 2009 - August to December Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application 13 ,j1 Section 7: Estimated Budget Part A: Estimated Infrastructure Costs (Planning, Design, and Construction) Identify the category (or categories) of work included in the proposed project. Work with your project sponsor to develop a cost estimate of the project. All cost estimates are to be based on applicable Mn/DOT guidance and State Aid Standards. CSAH 14 Pedestrian/Bike Trail Underpass Project Cost Estimate Engineer's Estimate Item Construction Engineering, Administration (30%) $350,000.00 105,000.00 455,000.00 Total Project Cost Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application 14 -If Part B: Estimated Non-Infrastructure Costs This section is for cost estimates of SRTS non-infrastructure proposals. Applicants applying for an Infrastructure Grant must develop a budget for Non-Infrastructure costs not to exceed $5000. Item Requested Committed Donated Total Cost SRTS Local Goods or Funds Funds Services Education . External Personnel Postage Printing Facility Rental Equipment and Supplies Promotion/Advertising Incentives and Awards Training Other Enforcement External Personnel Printing Equipment and Supplies Promotion/Advertising Incentives and Awards Training Other Encouragement External Personnel Postage Printing Facility Rental Equipment and Supplies Promotion/Advertising $1 ,500 Incentives and Awards Training Other Evaluation External Personnel Postage Printing Facility Rental Equipment and Supplies $500 Other . Total Estimated Non Infrastructure Costs Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application $2,000 15 4~ Section 8: Application Signature(s) (required) Applications must be signed by an authorized representative of the applicant and cosigned by the appropriate school or school district if different from the applicant. By signing this document, the applicant affirms that the statements contained in the application package are true and complete to the best of the applicant's knowledge and assumes responsibility for securing the necessary permits following all applicable design standards. Applicant Signature Signature (required) Name (required) Title (required) Date (required) Phone Number (required) School or School District Signature (required if different from the applicant) Signature (required) Name (required) Title (required) Date (required) Phone Number (required) Road Authority Signature (required for infrastructure projects) Signature (required) Name (required) Title (required) Date (required) Phone Number (required) Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application 16 ~-o Appendix A - Photographs of Current Safety Hazards Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application 17 S/ Appendix B - Safety Hazards Data Sources 1. Centennial School District Enrollment & Proximity Data 2. U.S. Bureau of the Census Block Data 3. Centennial Lakes Police Traffic Incident & Accident Data 4. SRF/Anoka County CSAH 14 Traffic Study Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application 18 5Z Appendix C - Centennial Elementary School Centerville Walking Map CentervJlle Elementary walkers map ~ Bbek f11led.in $trects .. grades t <5 walken Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application 19 ~ Appendix D - Proposed Improvements Underpass Box Culvert Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application j-J LENGTH .p" WlDfirf, 11;; OE:<i.. ~p DES. ~ OEU. Vi ( $XEW SKm SKEW 8 0'-11 3.(4" :I -1 3J'a :5-1r a ,'-a- :I -8 ;V.- ,,'-s- 10 1-8 1~'" ,3'-;3 ,,,,," 5'-a- 12 1'- II 318' ,3'. 10 1}4. 8"- 8- 14 :I. -D ~fIf' 4-31J'll 7' 8 .... 12" " ,!t" HAUN:lll (rrl"lt " 3"-Z- tC 1'-D" ~ (il'P) END ELEVATION WIDTHS 'Ill ( I} a 10 , .. LENGTH "LB" 16 OEXl. 30 DfG. Sl<EW lIKEW 1 -4 7 2'-3 6 a" 1 -IS I a 2 10 II 1 1'.:1: II -:I , 4- "u.. " b .. " aI ): '!& ~, SKEW &'-1 ~ 'p' "L" ~ PLAN VIEW SIDE ELEVATION LENGTH -LL- WlD'TllS; WFT) D iii 10 1 1 18 oe;c. Sl<EW -5 ;11 .. ~-s ....-11 1 .. "'0 oro. $K[W' .. -7 :1-2.:1 :) -g 1 ... '- PRECAST CONCRETE END SECTIONS TYPE: III - SKEWED Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application 21 ~.s- Appendix E - Stakeholders Letters of Support Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application 22 ~-Z Minnesota Safe Routes to School 2008 Grant Application Appendix F - Public Transit Information 23 ~1 Mayor Mary Capra, / Please be informed that we are submitting this letter on behalf of the residents who live in the Senior Bldg. at 7026 Centerville Rd. We want you to beaware of our concerns as Seniors living in the City' of Centerville. Thank You " ''I.'' -. ",,' ~ :'. .~. -~ 'l\ October 29,2007 Robin Barrett Great Lakes Management Co, 5000 Glenwood Ave Suite 150 Golden Valley, Mn. 55422-5146 As Senior Citizens on fixed incomes we moved into Chauncey Barett Gardens first Apt. Bldg. 9 years ago inCenterville, Mn. We did so because we felt the rent was reasonable. Most of us have lived . here since the building was built in 1998 with 16 Apartments. At pre-construction meetings we were told a small increase could be expected for a few years. Our rent has gone up for 8 of the 9 years since we have renewed our rental contracts. With the housing market being in the worst slump in 16 years and the competitive market in the rental of apartments, we are well aware of what is going on around us and we feel we are on a level with current market value rates in the area. Based on the above conditions we trust that our rental rates for 2008 will be held to meet our needs because we want to keep our apartments and this should be an advantage for all concerned. Please let us know what your decision is? Thank You from the Residents of Chauncey Barett Gardens 7026 Centerville Rd. Centerville Mn. 55038 Address mail to Mavis Solheid Apt. 111 cc: Anoka County Housing & Redevelopment Authority Ronda Sivarajah Commissioner District 6 Mary Capra Mayor City of Centerville Michael B. Pagh National Multi Housing Council Enclosure cd?-" U:~,~~Y)QfiN Jol+.vJ2 ~;t il) ~Q::-~. \sJJ1' :Uj}. .. CLrJl; ~ \ S ~4~ ,v ".--;/'<JJL~..::;?.c?" /~~__ .-/ ",",~c7~c-;; ,~."t:';r"'C7~:7, ,--....,. ~t;7~)fe~-?~.r CZ'77/'C"/y (f-i/J~U-- ,~<5h,"-t-,,'dZ{f lh~,,fv r7# /iD6 -,,11) i.L-C".t )Z,l (.:t.L- ' ..; Ji;f '"O?/ " __ J/ v . ,', I -# oS ;) ,t ;# d ,,~j (!.t-U... V/t.Ll-J't,. f t'''''-.r cl ,{. .. >"1-*-/1 ", ,1tr}..cUt~' [J \'1 ,'~\ 'i ,A.v) h1., .'1A,/ (/t- i"'1t. .:;..."\~. .c( >L,::~) --r-i.-k / C' 7 ~J ..J2~.A!{L .~~i,)(l. }") c.., "L.J .- h\p~(~z- ~i .e'eO'~~'- I 0 J" ,.\~ ~ ,:'~~~'Z-(...-d-/ (lt~''?_/~7C~)_ /1 3 '-- - ", t{:' ;/ If /'\ r..:"'-" '-~ // C-' /' I I --'~J ! .__1 /'~,.,y_'/'}/t} .Q,...-' c ,"'- _~, /~cL~ _ l~ c~& he (/"'-- _-=tCJ{)/ c:--~,) <').1 ./ ,fJ. __J....y - jO.,j ?> . a/!..c-c....X.- I .! tvV ,-",-!.h-L.. ';~L~e~1 -1 ~r-# /1 ~ . ... .I; J /, /,12) /\ C:ll~J ~"i::;Z/{/" ~.i-k{/Lr---' ...- / (...'- I " ,/r / /k: '_" L--r.!-"~C C c'lA_cl"""j- ( . ' '" -rt'~~."-d- (;J 7\~?-c/L:& -# / () ;J. ....~.. :~.. :=.. ' ..::Ci-___ "0"'~' ':.-:;.", -,'n: .'- -i-- __ __~_ ~-~. . ..- ---~... '. ~ '---"--- --"-~.,~ ---.' c_-=,-= __ ---:-~ _ ~___. ...__ ",",","-~~' - -- - -. --~-,- . -- ----- -- ~- -~- --.~:c~ Action Plan for 1- -----"- -, Step 1: mventorv of Local Issues and Concerns Purpose: · Assemble all pertinent background information related to the corridor · Develop a record of issues eBegin systematic review of needed projects · Develop a list of projects for Coalition review and action ') Each community assemble the following related to 1-35W/E within' their communitv: 1. Map of current land uses . 2. Map of proposed land uses (2030 and beyond, ifknown) 3. Adopted plans related to 1-35 W/E corridor (community transportation plan element, corridor studies in your coinmunity, traffic studies related to 1-35 W/E in your community, etc.) . I C Each community provide a map showing location and list describing: 1. Capacity issues (not enough lanes, too little stacking distance, etc.) 2. Safety issues related to 1-35W/E (visibility, lighting) 3. Access issues (too many driveways, truck routes at intersections, etc.) 4. Geometries (offset intersections, narrow width, etc.) 5. Transit issues (location of existing/planned rou~es, future unaddressed needs, etc.) 6. Freight issues (lo,?ation of existing/planned facilities including trucks, planes, rail, etc.) 7. Pedestrlan/Bicycle issues (connections, safety, crossings, visibility, etc.) Nex~.Step: , S.t~fffr~Dl each community/county meet to discuss/sort issues; return to future 1-35 W/E <;oalition meeting for presentation and discussion '. . 'fimeframe: 3'- 4 Months .l/ Ouestions: """;- ...._-~ _"':'_l~"l;J.:~'Y-'-}~-" .....cOhtac1: Kate Garwood, AICP. '.' ." . ..... ........ '..-; '--,';~':,i.:,{~~t.~~.,1;;,'(;;;,:~~:.j.~~':.~:.';'.'<:~\I'i-':;..... ~...<... .:".-: :.-" '< " .'-- ,:.-'. .::' ,,-':;;" ',' ,.:' . . , .' _'f, ',..; ,'.' . 'M-wtiIDodal TransPortation Manager; Arioka County 7~3,-862~4230 or via email atkate.garwoodc@co.anoka.mn.us "'H~_, ,':,=-:",. EbA ~~ - ":'~. .,,-- ~~:-:::--- ~ - - .....-......=--; ~~.--'-~ ~~ --- -..-......-.:.-- - =---~,. State of .Minnesota t.uhj .f AlI.b :J: ~nny :Dosch, dO solemnfy swear that :{ wlfl 6UJ'J'ort the T;onstitut/on of the UnitecC-=;State6 oncC of the -=;State of :;({inne.rota, oncC faitGfiJIy rttucharJe the cCutie.f of the office of the :ff.conomic :fJevelo;ment :Auttrority (:E:fJ;JtJ of the T;i~ of'CentervlfJe in the "{;ounty of ?tnoka oncC -=;State of :Jftinneorota, to the /iest of my jucf1ment oncC aliility. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14th day of November, 2007. Jenny Dosch Mary Capra, Mayor Dallas Larson, City Administrator (Seal) . Slale of .Mfllllesola t...1Jj ., .......b :[ ::Alicli'ael UWarner , cfu .rolemnfy swear that :[ 1riIf 6UJ'clJort the \;onstltution of the Uniteet'~tates anet' of the ~tate of :;(,{hme.rota, ancC faitlifiJly cl'uchar.Je the et'uties of the office of the :/iconomlc :Develo;pment ;lluthority (:Ii:J5;Jt) of the \;ity of \;enterville in the 1;ounty of ;?/nolia anatate oj:;(,{hme.rota, to the best ofmy Jacf1ment arue a/illity. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14th day of November, 2007. . Michael Warner Mary Capra, Mayor Dallas Larson, City Administrator (Seal) Sfafe of .MfJlJlesofa c...hj .r AIIella :[ gory T;apra, cl(, orolemnfy SWear that:f will 6Upport tile T;onstltution of tile Uniteet"~tate6 anet" of the ~tute if;l{inne.fOto, anet" faitliJUffy cttucharJe t/ffl et"utle.s if tGe office of the P-conomic Development :llut/i:,rity (P.D:JtJ of tile T;ity ofT;entervlfJe in tile 'County of ;?/nohr anll' ~tate of ;l{inne60to, to tile beat of my juctjment anll' aliiflty. I ,I I Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14th day of November, 2007. Mary Capra Dallas Larson, City Administrator (Seal) Slale of .Millllesola r.bhj .f ..u.b !f dom Le , cU, .rolemnfy swear that !f -will .m.jJ.jJort the Y:;onstitution of the UnitecC~tat86 once of the ~tate of ;;({inn860ta, once fultlijUfly cCuchar:Je the ceutie.s of the office of the Xconomic :DevelOJ1ment ?tutli'ority (~:D~) of the "G'i~ of1;enteTVilk in the 1;ounty of :ltnoka ancC ~tate of :JCtinne.soto, to the best of my jucf:pnent anti' aliility. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14th day of November, 2007. Tom Lee Mary Capra, Mayor Dallas Larson, City Administrator (Seal) Slale of .MiJlJlesola teufIJ ef AIIeb !f ~ff:f5aar , tl(, solemnly SWear that :f will su.1'.1'ort the T;onstltution of the UnitecC~tate6 oncC if the ~tute if ;;({inne.rota, oncC faitliJUlly ctl6char.Je the cCuties of the offtce of the 1"f.conomic :DevelOJ'ment ?tuthority (~:D?t) of the T;ity ofT;enterville in the l;ounty of ?tno/ia oncC ~tate of ;;({inne6ota, to the /iest of my juc[yment oncC alii1lty. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14th day of November, 2007. IeffPaar Mary Capra, Mayor Dallas Larson, City Administrator (Seal) State of .MInnesota t,uhj ,f AB,b :[ Lncta :!jroU.f8aTct , J<, erolemnfy swear that :f will 6UJ'J'ort the Y:;onstltution of t/i8 UnltetC~tates antC of t/i8 ~tate of ;;(l;nnesota, antC faitlijU/fy crucharJe t/i8 tCutles of t/i8 office of t/i8 P-conomlc :DevefOj'ment ?lutGority (Jf,:J5;Jt) of the Y:;ity of Y:;enterVifle in t/i8 Y:;ounty of ;ltno/ia anatate of;A{lnneerota, to t/i8 best ofmy judjment ancf a/illity. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14th day of November, 2007. Linda Broussard Mary Capra, Mayor Dallas Larson, City Administrator (Seal) BY-LAWS OF THE ECONOMIC DEVEWPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CI1Y OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA ARTICLE I - THE AUTHORITY Section 1. Name of Authority. The name of the Authority shall be the "Economic Development Authority of the City ofCenterville, Minnesota" (which may sometimes be referred to as the "EDA" or the "Authority"), and its governing body shall be called the Board of Commissioners (the "Board"). The Board shall be the body responsible for the general governance of the Authority and shall conduct its official business at meetings thereof. Section 2. Seal of Authority. The Authority shall have an official seal, as required by Minnesota Statutes Section 469.096, Subdivision 1. Section 3. Office or Authority. The offices of the Authority shall be the Centerville City Hall. ARTICLE II - OFFICERS Section 1. Officer. The officers of the Authority shall be a President, a Vice-President, a Treasurer, an Assistant Treasurer, and a Secretary. The President, the Vice-President and the Treasurer shall be members of the Board and shall be elected annually, and no Commissioner may be both President and Vice-President simultaneously. The Assistant Treasurer and the Secretary need not be members of the Board. Section 2. President. The President shall preside at all meetings of the Board. Except as otherwise authorized by resolution of the Board, the President and the Secretary (the Vice-President, in the Secretary's absence or incapacity) shall sign all contracts, deeds and other instruments made or executed by the Authority, except that all checks of the Authority shall be signed by the Treasurer and Assistant Treasurer. At each meeting the President shall submit such recommendations and information as he or she may consider proper concerning the business, affairs and policies of the Authority. Section 3. Vice-President. The Vice-President shall perform the duties of the President in the absence or incapacity of the President~ and in case of the resignation or death of the President, the Vice-President shall perform such duties as are imposed on the President until such time as the Board shall select a new President. Section 4. Secretary. The Secretary shall keep minutes of all meetings of the Board and shall maintain all records of the Authority. The Secretary shall also have such additional duties and responsibilities as the Board may from time to time and by resolution prescribe. Section S. Treasurer. The Treasurer shall have the care and custody of all funds of the Authority and shall deposit the same in the name of the Authority in such Bank, or banks as the Board may select. The Treasurer and Assistant Treasurer shall sign all orders and checks for the payment of money and shall payout and disburse such moneys under the direction of the Board. The Treasurer shall keep regular books of account showing receipts and expenditures and shall render to the Board, at least annually (or more often when requested), an account of such transactions and also of the financial condition of the Authority. The Assistant Treasurer shall act as the Treasurer's agent and assistant to perform the above-described duties, subject to the Treasurer's approval thereof Section 6. Additional Duties. The officers of the Authority shall perform such other duties and functions as may from time to time be required by the Board or the bylaws or roles and regulations of the Authority. Section 7. Vacancies. Should the office of President, Vice-President, Treasurer, Assistant Treasurer or Secretary become vacant the Board shall elect a successor at the next regular meeting, or at a special meeting called for such purpose and such election shall be for the unexpired term of said officer. Section 8. Additional Personnel. The Board may from time to time employ such personnel as it deems appropriate to exercise its powers, duties, and functions. The selection and compensation of such personnel shall be determined by the Board. ARTICLE m - Meetings Section 1. Regular Meetings. The regular meetings of the Board shall occur according to a meeting schedule, if any, adopted or revised from time to time by resolution of the Board. Section 2. Special Meetings. Special meetings of the Board may be called by the President or any two members of the Board for the purpose of transacting any business designated in the call. At such special meeting no business shall be considered other than as designated in the cal~ but if all members of the Board are present at a special meeting any and all business may be transacted at such special meeting. Notice of any special meeting shall be posted and/or published as may be required by law. Section 3. Quorum. The power of the Authority shall be vested in the Board. Four Commissioners shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of conducting the business and exercising the powers of the Authority and for all other purposes but a smaller number may adjourn from time to time until a quorum is obtained. When a quorum is in attendance, action may be taken by the Board upon a vote of a majority of the Commissioners present. Section 4. Order of Business. At the regular meetings of the Board the following shall be the order of business: 1. Roll call. 2. Approval of the minutes of previous meeting. 3. Bills and communications. 4. Reports. 5. Unfinished business. 6. New business. 7. Adjournment. All resolutions shall be written or transcribed and shall be retained in the journal of the proceedings of the Board, maintained by the Secretary. Section 5. Adoption of Resolutions. Resolutions of the Board shall be deemed adopted if approved by not less than a simple majority of all Commissioners present, unless a different requirement for adoption is prescribed by law. Resolutions may, but need not be read aloud prior to vote taken thereon and may, but need not be executed after passage. Section 6. Rules of Order. The meetings of the Board shall be governed by the most recent edition of Robert's Rules of Order. ARTICLE IV - MISCELANEOUS Section 1. Amendments to Bylaws. The bylaws of the Authority shall be amended only by resolution approved by at least four of the members of the Board. Section 2. Fiscal Year. The fiscal year of the Authority shall coincide with the fiscal year of the City of Centerville, Minnesota. Adopted on ,2007. F 1 CITY OF CENTERVILLE tervi[{e 'Estabfis!iCI( 1857" MONTHL Y ENGINEER'S REPORT For November 14,2007 City Council Meeting Italics = New information Normal = No change front last report. 1. Pheasant Manh 3n1 Addition (000616-03134-0). The trail has been patched to correct drainage problems. Minor restoration and approval of record plans remain before the contract can be finaled 1. Hunten Crossing 3n1 Addition (000616-05141-0). Wear course paving is complete. We are awaiting IC-134 forms from the contractor before issuing a final pay requests. 3. list AvenuelBaekage Road (000616-05143-0). Retainage has been reduced and the contract will remain open until the topsoil pile is removed The County's contractor for the CSAH 14 Improvements intends to place fill from their excavations on our Parcel D. 4. Old Mill Road Improvements (000616-06147.0). Paving is scheduled for Friday, the 9h. Seeding will follow the week of the J th. 5. Fairview Street Improvements (000616-06148-0). We are awaiting IC-J34 forms from the contractor before issuing a final pay request. 6. Block 7 Redevelopment Grading and Utility Improvements (000616-06152-0). The contractor will be repairing a cracked section of sanitary sewer pipe the week of the 12"'. 7. Centerville Townoffice Park 2nd Addition (000616-06152-0). A punch list will be created the week of the 1 th. 8. Clearwater Creek Estates (Hanzal Property) (000616-06154.0). Grading is substantially complete. 9. Hidden Spring Park (000616-07155-0). All items on our list discussed at the last council meeting should be completed by the 12th with the exception of the rain garden plant replacements which will be held over until spring. The shoreline will receive some temporary fixes this fall with plant replacements next spring. 10. Downtown Overhead Power Relocation (000616-07156-0). The south ROW of Heritage Street has been staked Negotiations with homeowners continue. 11. Comprehensive Plan (000616-07157-0). Centerville will host a public open house to share the alternatives that the Planning Commission and City Council has developed for the Comprehensive Plan. The meeting will be on November 13th from 4:30 to 7 pm at the Saint Genevieve Community Center at 6995 Centerville Road After hearing input from the public,sthe Planning Commission and City Council will decide on a preferred alternative and begin draftin{T the nlan. 12. 2009 Street and Utility Improvements (000616-07158-0). A public Open House was held on October.fh. The Council reviewed numerous issues at a workshop on October 2f1'. The Feasibility Report is being revised to reflect incorporate public comments and council concerns. The Feasibility Report should be adopted and a public hearing should be scheduled Preliminary survey work will need to begin shortly to avoid interference from snowcover. 13. CSAH 14 Construction Services (000616-07159-0). Water main and Forcemain work between the lakes is complete. 14. Downtown Redevelopment Comprehensive Infrastructure Plan (000616-07161-0). The plan has been revised to include a phasing plan. The city council should adopt the plan at some point as a guide for the construction of the public irifrastructure. 15. Downtown Redevelopment Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W) (000616-07162- 0). The formal comment period has expired Comments were received from the Anoka County Highway Department, the Rice Creek Watershed District and the Met Council. Official Responses and Findings of Fact are being drafted 16. Miscellaneous -E"dofmemo- Updateoctober2007UpdateOctober2007Update E;" progr- uction In Octobet....~....~.!.". I of 62 new programs were produced utilizing the North Metro TV facilities. This const~" .30:00 hours of new programming. .. 17 programs were produced by the public .. 45 programs were produced by staff Van sti" The van . for 82:45:00 haulS of production. The fonowing events were videotaped: .. Girls Soccer: Blaine vs. Centennial L1VEI Boys Soccer. Blaine VB. Centennial L1VEI .. Girls Soccer. Coon Rapids VB. Blaine LIVEr Boys Soccer. Coon Rapids vs. Blaine UVEr .. Football: Cooper vs. Spring Lake Park L1VEI .. Volleyball: Centennial vs. Park Center .. Volleyball: Blaine VB. Centennial LIVEI .. Football: Osseo VB. Centennial .. Blaine Fall Dance Show .. Boys Soccer. Spring Lake Park VB. Maple Grove .. Sports Den L1VEl Football: Fridley VB. Spring Lake Park LIVEr .. Volleyball: Coon Rapids vs. Spring Lake Park .. Volleyball: 5AM Otr Finals: Maple Grove VB. Centennial .. BlaineJSpring Lake Park Athletic Association Football Championships: _2nd/3rd Grade Championship Game -4th Grade Championship Game -51tl Grade Championship Game ..sth Grade Championship Game _7th Grade Championship Game ~Itl Grade Championship Game .. Volleyball: 5AM Semi-Final: Blaine vs. Osseo workr ~>--_sI10P------->- r--"nstructor - r Organization \- Students ,---'--'-~--------'--"-----"- r--.------..-----~------..,---- r---------------- r-------.------ I Orientation I Joel Knudsen 'I Blaine Youth I 5 I ! I Wrestling/General Public I \---yntro-to-OiQnaTVicteo-----I--ejamian-kussian --- [-~:St:~~e:~ P~~iC -I------:f------- r-~---------~------~-->--------....- r~--'.--.._----~..~ r--.------.----- r-----~------..-..._..----" i Advanced Digital Video I Damian Kussian i General Public i 2 ~.,,";.,_.~____.___~~~T____.'~__._~_~."'<_. r----'.---~-----~--~.~-~--'--~ r'~-~.--,._--~---~..-..~-~----- r-'~~~---;'-P--...,~~--'-- I Advanced Camera ! Damian Kussian I Blaine Youth Wrestling i 2 r--'~-<..---'~.~~_____~___v,.,__ '.~-.--_.-~.----.--..,.l~'~-~-.__.._-~~.--~--..~ r---~~~'~~~.--"~.~~ I studio B i Joel Knudsen I General Public I 2 r---'"'M.-~.___T__.___~._._~~._._~~._____T______.~_ r'"~~---.--~~---.~ r-"~~'---- - - ..., -~-~- r-~-'^--~~.=~--- ! Final Cut Pro I Damian Kussian! Blaine Youth i 4 i i i Wrestling/General Public ! !~~_.~_v___._""'''_'_._____~~__.___.,_.___''._~__.n__..- r--~~~~~------~~-~--.~-"' I-~-."-'"~--------~-- r"'-~--~-=,,-.-~.-~~.~-'"'-~~-'---"" i Studio A ! Damian Kussian i General Public i 3 . -7-Workshops r. .-.....-. - .. ............ i -21 studentS Highlights Cen ISD 12 project We were, ntacted by Cathy Wyland, the Director of Community Services and Communications, for the centennial School District. She asked for NMTVs help with assessing equipment needs, developing a plan for replacement, and any other assistance we would be able to offer. We met with Cathy and two of her staff members to determine their needs and goals. Rick visited their facility and determined that due to their history of problems, and the complexity and uncertainty of their current system that a total rebuild of the audiolvideo facility makes the most sense. Rick will be meeting with vendors to explore various possibilities. Cathy and her team are also interested in producing a monthly program with school district administrators. Originally, she envisioned purchasing equipment to make production on site possible. staff suggested that they simply utilize the NMTV facility, which would save them a great deal of money. T .J. has already been assigned to instruct them on the operation of the Tricaster system in studio B. Blaine youth wrestling We are currently working with Ben Moody, Youth Program Director, Blaine Youth Wrestling, to teach his group to shoot and edit their events. Originally Ben contacted us for assistance in putting together a series of training DVDs for his wrestlers. We were eager to help and signed him up for classes. Ben and his team are finished with classes and have begun checking out the cameras. In addition to producing the training DVDs they will be taping the actual youth wrestling matches for playback on channel 14. Blaine wrestling coach, Ben Moody during camera class. Local Decision 2007 Danika and Ben produced several candidate forums in October. They taped forums for the Uno Lakes Mayoral, the Circle Pines City Council, the Spring Lake Park School District, and the Anoka Hennepin School District # 2 races. We gave the Spring Lake Park School District a copy of their forum so they could play it on their channel. Providing content for Blaine's website Danika, Ben, and Damian have worked to create programming that will be provided via Blaine's website utilizing their Granicus system. Damian created the animated intro, and Danika and Ben put together a series of City Scope stories relating to Blaine. Programming notes . October City Scope stories included the lino lakes street reconstruction referendum, Minnesota Commissioner of Education, Alice Seagren's visit to Blaine High School's Center for Engineering Math and Science, and JohnsvilleElementary School's Minnesota School of Excellence Award. . City Scope is now using motion graphics for all graphicS pages and 10 keys. · The new digital cameras have been installed in studio A, making all of our programs look really good. . I don't know how they do it, but somehow. Ben and Danika got an interviewwith Jerry Seinfeld for the October episode of Inside Entertainment. New music on channels We are currently working to get locally produced music on our access channels between programming. Each month a new local group serves as the guest "house band" Ben, some cheerleaders, and Jerry Seinfeld. for that particular episode of Inside Entertainment. Most of these groups are very interested in having us play their music on the channel. The first step was to develop a Music Release and Unrestricted License form, which, thanks to our attorney steve Guzzetta, we have. The form has been forwarded to many local groups, and hopefully soon we'll have another way to highlight local talent via our community access channels. Meetings with legislators I was able to meet with Representative Scott Kranz on October 181to. We discussed the current form of House File 2351 and the various ways that it would hurt community television. Representative Kranz was very sympathetic to our concerns, and supportive of community television in general. He thanked me for the information I provided and asked that I keep in touch if the legislation progresses. I have also been contacted by Representative Tom Tillberry's office. They are trying to schedule a meeting in mid-November. PR bits and pieces . Gathered images and worked on curriculum for Final Cut studio 2 class . Created a new Sports Den promo . Created a new listing of classes for the Anoka County Community Ed publication . Worked on new website content and format with consultant . Created a new Artist Spotlight . Made an intra animation for Blaine/City Scope web programming Computer assistance Centerville · Installed back-up decks Production equipment consulting Spring Lake Park . Followed up on plans to upgrade the AN equipment. The council will be revamping the chamber area and AN room. The city has asked that Rick be a part of the planning process. Centennial ISO 12 . Met with Cathy Wyland, Jan Johnson and Gail Schrooten to hear their concerns and get a feel for what they want and need. . Toured facility. Wrd.e and submitted preliminary report regarding equipment replacement project. . Scheduled to meet with vendor on site to start the design and bidding process. ~ Playback Stats ',city ----I Number of Times Programs i Hours Programmed on , I Played I Channel , -----.----r ----,------------ i Blaine i 172 i 238:18:15 r-------CenterViiiii------ r- -._-- ----44"----------------- r------------59:00:OS-------- ------~-----_._-~._-----,---------- , : Circle Pines i 167 i 147:59:21 ,-,..--------- -------- r------'--------'-'--------------------- r--------------------- ! Ham Lake I 146 i 138:42:59 r----.------"lexIrlQion.------ r------.,------91------------------ r-------- 23:40:40 --.~------.. ,--,.-'------------------'---- r-----'---.,-------------------------------- ,-------~--------------- ! Uno Lakes i 94 i 17:30:00 r--- spji-ng"LakePaik-- --'8 ---',.-- .---.-----~.- r - ,- -------22:14:40.----- r----------------TotB's:-- f 722 Program P~ybacks --- r 647:26:01 HOurs of Video - ! I I Programming on , , I i I I Channels pr~rOdUCed by the Public r------r------ Title ----------------------- r---------PrOduce'--------- :-----Runtime----~~-~.- r----poeRiVe-irlvestT~Tons:~veiOdrome-- - i=ranSorensen ...------- [--------00:48:46-------- i ~ci~ I r-------'------- ,.~-,,-. "'_____..___.~_____.'."~^e ~_~~,<'u'>__ ~ -""~- "-~----~ r" "~'-...,,-- '__m__ -.~-.--,,-..~- i Hotfoot Stompers Presents: Fall-ing Fran Sorensen - 00:57:20 I into Dancing Lovepower (3) f.--- .-"Churc-hofSaint-PauTin-HamnLake--. n' _..__' .~. _~~~_ _ ,,~____._.. '__'~~'o___"~.,_,_",,-~'_e_~__ ~_. ,_,_~,__,_", Kingswood Church Service (5) _ ,,_ ._, _~~. '''_'__''.'._"_'''~__'.''___'_''_''_'''___ .____.c___ .~"<'_.__ _ " n".___ -." _~ , The Virtuous Woman (6) "'_".~.__.__ . om'." _., ____~ ~ ~__._ .,___" 17 New Programs ,n Rick Larson/Ann Sandell i _.'_ ,,_on _~~____,_ .____ _I~N~~~..___~,~_~__ __,_ _~.__ Sharon Shultz ---.Cindy"Harayn------- ! ~. ._-,~~.,,_.._... -~"-""~--.-'-'-- Elizabeth Bankole 03:00:00 .__._---,~~._._-- 00:58:57 _.~. .---- - -,,- -"."--------.---., ,-, 03:56:40 ..<>--~---,-,-._---_.,....__.._--<.., 02:48:05 _"_._..___,._._~_~_._"______.,,.. _m"~_ 12:29:48 New Hours pr~rOduced by Staff ~~i:~~=!:~~7~~:~~~~~~ ,~~~~= I i-- DlstrlCt#ff Sct'loon3rd-Meetfng101a;oY--- r--' f:.:i.fionson .-- --- 0'1 :-10:00- r-5iSilict #1f"sct'lool BrdMeeting-10I22i(jt-i---Y-J. TronsOn---------- --- 0<>:4-3:30- i- "-MeetY~~~~n~~::~iague-Of------I------..t-..J.fronson' . I 01:30:10 r------- Schools in Focus - ----I----T~J. Tronson ------- [- 00:29:55 r----...CentervilleStreei and Utility ProjecC-i--- TJTronson-----'-- r-------01:32:38-- r----- Biaine HiQh School's 101li Annual---i T.J. Tronson-----T------OO:35:30- i Veteran's Day Program I i r------------..Clty Scope (4) IDanika KlyveJBen Hayle ---1-- 0{-3i:01--- I Local Decision 2007: Uno Lakes Mayor !D3nika KlyvelBen Hayle I 00:26:04 !-Tocar~~~:~i~~~~~~:-Street-- r---oarlikci-Kiyve/Ben-HSYle--- /"----00:05:00---- ------,--- -----.---,----- r------.--- i Local Decision 2007: Anoka Hennepin ! Danika KlyveIBen Hayle I 00:19:38 ! School Board District #2 I I r----------.--------Tjije.--cont---"-~---------- f---""-PrOducer~con(.-------_....- r---Runtime.coni"'- I" -, ."."- '^ ...<o,~,~~_ ~~,~_,,_,~__,_ ~~.-~~~-,,-~.___~'~-~_ ._-.....~~,,-~--<>"" _.~~.---"--~~ __-_n,~.,'_,.,." -,'.~- f'""~'^--"~-- -<""~"~."-_.....,,-,>.-.,-~~.,.._.-~.~."'~.....-~,,..-~~.,"-. ~ r~'~ .__'~K'__,_~~_........'_~~~~,~"_._~~_' '^~ i Local Decision 2007: Spring Lake Park I Danika K1yveJBen Hayle I 00:38:00 I School Board! I r--..---.------.----.--...----.--------~-------.-... r----.-~---"--.-.-.-.-.------ r-----..-------.....---- I Local Decision 2007: ~ircle Pines City i Danika Klyve/Ben Hayle 00:26:00 i Council i i . i Ham Lake Mayor's Report -- r Danika K1yve/Ben HayJe r--oo:39:5o-------- ! LLPD Roll Call --- r . Danika Klyve/Ben HaY!e- r-~ 00:29: 15 --- r-----.~--~.---~--'~----.-----'-.~--......-'^~---r~--~-~- r----c--~.- I Inside Entertainment i Danika K1yvelBen ! 00:29:31 I I HaylelDamian Kussian i -.-.-..---.~----._._--..---------- ,----- . -'-- r----.---.-- I Metro North Chamber of Commerce i Michele Silvester I 01 :02:54 . Presents: Senator Norm Coleman i i --- -----.------ .- -_._---.-.----------. ----.,-.. -. ---- ! ..-...-.-.-----..----.--------..--....--..----- ...- .'-- ----.......---------'.-- Sports Den (5) I Kenton KipplMattWaldron I 02:12:30 r--G---Soceer: -BlainelCentenniaILlVEI-----r Kenton KipplMattWaldronl 01:42:25 f---~-B-Soccer:--Blaine/CentennialiIVEf- .---- r-"KentonKT,)jiiMatt Waldron - [---(j1 :44:25 --- r----a SoCCer: .Coon RapjdsIBlaine-L1vEf------- r- Kenton KippIMatt Waldron - '----01 :40:00-- r--(f Soccer:-Coon RapidslBlaineuVE! --- IKenton - Kip~Matt Waldron -- 1"----01:45: 30 ..-.-- r~'-'------ Ftbf CooperIsCP-lIVEr--------------.--- r--------Kenton Kipp ...-------.,------- 02:29:~---"- i \lbaii:-CentenniallPark-Center . ..... -KentooKi-pp----M- 01:04:3"f--- .- ,..--~"'_,~_~__"~_.~_~~___~__~'.~--.-.____~'_~..._~',.~_' r,7~-~'.-.~~'-~-"- ----'.- r--" i Vball: Blaine/Centennial LIVE! ! Kenton Kipp ! 01:18:00 r.----.--.-.. -------------.~---._--- ---.---- r-..-------- ! Ftbl: OsseolCentennial i Kenton Kipp i 02:03:30 [....------- Blaine FailDance--show-------..._.--- rm---------- Kenton- Kipp ------ r----.--01 :06:20 --.- r' .---- --...-............---.....----------.-----..----..----.-----.----...... ..-...-.------.....----------------.---....--- ,..-.-.--..-.---.---.---.... I B Soccer: 5AA Championship: Maple Kenton Kipp 01:35:05 . Grove/Spring Lake Park _. . "__'__" .. _,__. ,_ _.,,""'c._~~__,.____~.._.~__. '_'_~~__._'~'_.' ~ '_"__'~"___'_""'_" u, FtbJ: Fridley/Spring Lake Park LIVE! --"Vball:5AA1"Sf-RountiCoon Rapids/Spring Lake Park . _'_,,____ ____.___.~~".'._~. ______"__.____~__..__.______, _.~.F__'~ ~~. ._.,._,u _ _'. __'._ __~ n Vball: SAAA Qtr Finals: Maple GrovelCentennial _.._._....__.____..________________.__________....w.... ....-na.;Rf..- .. BIISLP M Ftbl Championships: 2 '/3 Grade Game - -atlSl.P'-AAFtbIChamPlonshiPs: 4th . --,-- -----Kenton..Kipp..------- ,....- 01:"29:45-----. Grade Game - - .-.-..,..,-. ~-.._-,-~.~_.~._--_._----._,,----..__._---. ~-_..-- -.- .' -~."~-., ._...',,-,='~' BIISLP M Ftbl Championships: 5th Grade Game ----SVSLPAAFtbi'championshlps:-6th'--i--KentonKTpp,tMaliwildron--- r---- ....01:42:20-... --.-- Grade Game I ' 'S-"SLPAA FtbIChampionshlps:ith..----r Kenton'KipPIMattWaidron-- Grade Game I "Si/SLP . AA--FtbIChamj)ionships: " Bth'" - r-'KentonKipP/MattWaidron Grade Game I VbaIF5AAA-semj:.Rnai:-.eiafneJosseo--r'''KentonKlpp;MattWaidiOn ,- -- - --01 :15:00- ,------.---------45 New programs--.-------I--.--.--------....---..-..--------..I-..49~=:ew---- Kenton Kipp Kenton Kipp 02:13:30 01:15:50 Kenton Kipp 01:51:30 Kenton Kipp r-----JJi'31:cjo...--- - Kenton Kipp 01 :40:30 01:29:45 01:32:30 If you have any questions or comments regarding this monthly report please contact Heidi Amson at 763.231.2801 or h- arnson@mtn.org.