The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2008-09-02 P & Z Packet tervi[[e 'Esta6{isfied 1857 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2008 6:30 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call II. APPEARANCE S/PRE SENTATION(S) III. PUBLIC HEARING (S) IV. OLD BUSINESS V. NEW BUSINESS 1. Mr. Russell Koski, 7280 Twin Lakes Avenue - Potential Variance Request to Enlarge Existing 3 Stall Garage - Encroach 35' Front Yard Setback 2. Site Plan Review - M. A. Mortenson Construction, 6812 - 20th Avenue South (Old Muellner Pipeliner Building) VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS VII. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES 1. August 5, 2008 Meeting Minutes VIII. ADJOURNMENT * * REMINDERS * * September 1, 2008 - City Hall Closed in Observance of Labor Day Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting - September 6, 2008, 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers September 9,2008 - State Primary - St. Genevieve's Community Parish Center, 6995 Centerville Road * * Exercise Your Right to Vote** - 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. City Council Meeting - September 10, 2008, 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers City Council Meeting - September 24,2008,6:30 p.m. Council Chambers Dear Planning and Zoning Committee Members: I am writing with hopes of receiving your input on a home addition I am planning and a possible variance that would be needed to accomplish this project. I reside at 7280 Twin Lakes Avenue, which is on the comer of Twin Lakes and 73rd street. Before filing an official request for a variance, Mayor Capra suggested I contact you and get your thoughts as to whether or not this is a variance the Planning and Zoning committee would approve. If your response is favorable, I will certainly complete the application for a variance to present to the Planning and Zoning Committee at the September meeting. First, I will provide you with a brief history. At the end of May, I incurred the expense of having my property surveyed to obtain a Certificate of Surveyance. Mr. Paul Paulzer recommended this course of action so the property monument locations could be verified. It was a good idea as there was no Certificate of Survey on file at the city (Someone told me all homes should have one on file, supplied by the developer, before the lot was sold. I will supply the city with a copy.) Like so many Centerville residence, my house was damaged this summer from the hailstorm and high wind. Both the roof and siding need to be replaced. Because of this unfortunate event, I would like to take advantage of having a contractor on site and do some home improvements. The primary addition would be to the garage. (To support my proposal, I have included photos and a rough sketch of the lot, a bit crude and I hope you can read it.) Along with the house, my truck received about $4100 in damage as well. As you may know, when many of the homes in Centerville were built, the garages were not of the size to include today's larger vehicles. Right now, the depth of the garage does not accommodate my truck. Because of that, the vehicle is kept outside and is susceptible to storm damage and vandalism. By lengthening the garage, the vehicle could be kept inside, keeping it secure. I believe this is a benefit, not just to me certainly, but it helps keep insurance rates down for everybody as fewer insurance claims are filed. I for one do not like filing insurance claims. In fact (and fortunately), in the 14 years I have lived in my home, this is the first homeowner's claim I've had to submit. That being said, my comer lot is somewhat unique in that Twin Lakes Avenue curves as it approaches 73rd street (see sketch). If my understanding of current ordinance is correct, the foundation of the home has to have a 35 feet setback from the road easement. Due to this curvature of Twin Lakes A venue, there is room for a westward extension of my garage. (That is what I'm attempting to demonstrate with my crude graphics.) At the southwest comer of the foundation, there is room for about 1.5 feet of addition before reaching the 35 feet setback requirement. Looking at the double stall of the garage, the distance to the road easement increases to 40 feet at the northwest comer. Using the dimensions off of the documents provided by the surveyor, I have room to increase the length of the third stall of the garage about 1.5 feet and the first stall by 2.5 feet and be compliant with city ordinance, as I understand it correctly. However, therein lies my issue. Discussing plans with some contractors, they stated that working with such dimensions would not be the best for construction purposes. They said it's much easier and cost effective to work in 4 feet increments. That is why I would like to request a variance on the 35 feet setback rule. I could increase the first stall of the garage 4 feet and be within 35 feet of the road easement. However, the second and third stall would have to encroach upon the 35 feet setback by a mere 2.5 feet. That is what I am requesting - a variance to go 2.5 feet beyond the 35 feet setback from the road easement. The contractor also suggested extending the garage 4 feet would not be noticeable. As demonstrated in the photos, looking south and north down Twin Lakes Ave, there is no linear relationship between all the homes. Like one contractor suggested, if all the homes were in a straight line all the way down the street, it may not look appropriate if my house was 2.5 feet beyond that and did not conform. But, as you can see, the homes do not line up (see photos) and extending my garage 4 feet would not be noticeable. To summarize: · I would like to add 4 ft on to the front of my garage, encroaching into the road easement by 2.5 feet (does not affect easement with neighbor's property) · Benefit: protect property from storm damage and vandalism (as the city did to protect their equipment by purchasing a larger Public Works Building). . Extending 2.5 feet into the easement does not affect the esthetics value and visual relationship with other homes on my side of Twin Lakes Ave. . Ease of construction for the contractor and cost benefit to working with 4 feet addition instead of 1.5 to 2.5 feet. ......~~.J ,.~ "'~~'...:li~'. ....~~ . ~., -- Plan: Add 4 ft to front of garage. . Green line is approximates road easement · Presuming distance from garage foundation to easement is to be no less than 35 ft · Because of curvature on Twin Lakes Ave, distance to easement is 36 ft 7 inches at the SW corner of foundation (-0-), to 40 ft on the NW corner of foundation ( 1;{ ) ~~o (....... \ \ ------ o ~ ';'v,e o 0 ~ ~ 5 ~p.\Z : ..J} N -rvv ~ \ \ \ Ow 'i - -- - . ... , \ \ --- -, \ -,- l\l V ~ ..".. 'r:> 7..... "'",' \ '-.. .:\ , /" z:~.g 1'-1'. 1"2:'~ __ /'1.7 :t (::I c:: l\ ~ ~ ~ oC"- r- -.1 . ::z:.~ ~~ ~ \1" C> ::. ~ ,~ C'J::> ~ ~ \~ . ~ \~ ~ \., - -\. '" '--' ..... ~ /" ~- -- Ii {.. R-:;;22.~' ,-- " I N \!.l ~ :t ~ '- ..... l\ ~ ~ N 1:(\ ~ IS - "'. ~ ~ " '0 - ce'i fe;-IJ/u: ./ 57: 73 rd _CE.RTIFICA TE OF SURVEY_ I'" m 'f:.c..v,-h FOR. Russell Koski 7280 Twin Lakes Ave Centerville, MN . I I ... ~ I - --- ., f47./Q N 8'1-/0 '21 "w -~ -- ~ ,. / "" Lor e.cl"l'Ier turd~/c.. ,d-,'/ily?ost I , \ \ \ , '" \ '" I ,.-\ \ I A I -:.... ,.- ~ \ \ I " ,t) \....~ .,. N tl !-.- - - - - - . - - -- Zf.S- '" , t_, . (~ \ ~ ~ Ill. ~~~ '\~ !'t'I ~ 1_' ~~ I ~~o~ \ ~ ~ c::) I.. v.....f- ~ 'H~ ..-, ~ I ~ 11 Ir, . ~ <;) I \:; I I I gtJ/ \~ J;~ .~~ oJ \1 \r-., l\j !! o ,/ /\ \ ~ \w > \<1.. \~ 1-' , "'-) ..scale: 1 incll= 20 feeL '1{J.I{. --'_ . lC.-- I \ , .... (/Ii-- -s <; " ~ Ie; .,. M . \,. l'''___~:: -, (3.v -II 7Z, 9() ffovSI! ~ 1 I (C3 hit:." r~p Drillt!!wJ.'Ij I ~ c CIl l"(,\/ &~l!- . . Denotes iron marker found o Denotes W' iron pipe set 20 I;; t) . {(I'1~3q P ., ,1;1) \.. '/'1.'3_ __ S. -- tie _111.t4:,6l>38'OJ o Denotes nail set --- ,L)( Denotes steel fence -- -( -~\ \/1 \i \, . I If, "-",11 ,f t/f.. \) t '- ~ I :..-.v c:at'ftfi ltIAT 'MS IUIrCY YN IW.PN/IIC BY . ClR ~ IllY OIM'CT .tuNrt~ MD 1HAT 11M" DULY -'1IIU a..- ~ UNI8 _.LMI t1f 1HE ITAlI. aF ...~A. . . '..~ - .:!:t~ Res- No. 6274 .....~ . I -, I I .: HOVStE: , . \ ~ .\,.' _h f-', - 69 Date _.. Mortenson development Mortenson Development, Inc. 700 Meadow Lane North Minneapolis, MN 55422-4899 main 763.522.2100 fax 763.287.5457 www.mortenson.com August 27, 2008 Dallas Larson City Administrator City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 Re: 6812 20th Avenue Siteplan Approval Dear Mr. Larson: M.A. Mortenson Company is seeking site plan approval for three accessory structures. All three structures will feature a split faced concrete block or precast concrete exterior and will generally match the color of the existing building on the property and surrounding industrial buildings. Today, we seek siteplan approval to build these accessory structures in phases, on an as-needed basis. Per our discussions with the Rice Creek Watershed District, this site was originally approved for a maximum of 80% hard surface site coverage. We intend to increase the amount of hard surface as needed but will at no point exceed the 80% maximum in the future. Details of our proposed phasing are included herein. Upon siteplan approval, Mortenson will fence the remainder of the site as shown on the attached drawings and provide landscaping as directed by the City of Centerville. Peter Brodd Assistant Project Manager Enclosure (2) MoAo MORTENSON YARD MASTERPLAN PROJECT TEAM PREPARED FOR M.A. MORTENSON DEvELOPMENT ARCI-IITECT, MOMENTUM DESIGN GROUP BARR"T" MOR6AN (PE.! PETE'" B~DD B""AN C.ADIENT (P~JECT MANAc.e"') JEFf' ~DE (A~...ITECT) (..'V 2~<2>-"523 (612) SS4.~~~2 1"" MEADOUJ LANE NOM... MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA ~422-4a~S (163) 28'-5431 FAX (1E:o~) 261.5451 FAx (~5V ~2~- 1818 GENERAL NOTES POST OFFICE 60X 24414 EO:NA, MINNE50TA e.5>424 A66REvlA TIONS ABY -ABOve EX... -EXl-IAUST LAM -lAMINATE PP -POIIE'" POLE ACe -ACCES&IBLE EXIST -EXISTINe. LAY -LAvATO",," aT -Glt.IA~ TILE AI'!' -ABOve FINIS...ED FLOO'" EJ .EXPAN&ION JOiNT L... - LEFT ...AND '" -~Dlue A~~ .ARCl-IITECT EXP -EXPANSION LT .LlCsl-lT F<A -...eTUF<N AI'" ALUM -ALUMINUM EF -EX~AUST FAN MAT -MATE/<IAL I<D -I<OOF D~IN A~X -A~XIMATE ELEC FNL -ELECT""CAL PANEL M~ -MAN~OLE ...eF -...eFE...eNCE BPL -BEARINal: FLATE EUK: -ELECT""C WATE'" COOLE'" MF'" -MANUFACTU...e I<F -F<OCK FACE eM -BENC~ MAf'iK EXT -EXTE""~ MAS -MAllON",," ~ -R,I6l-lT l-IAI\ID BLKc. -BLOCKINc. Ff'E -FINI~ED FLOO", ELEYATION MO -MASON"'"T" OFENINc. ~ .Fi!ICsI-lT OF WAY BOT -BOTTOM FFL -FI...eFLACE MTL -METAL I'!M -~OM BOW -BOTTOM OF WALL FD -FLOO'" D~IN Mlec -MI&cELLANEOUIiI 1<0 -~~ OPENINe. CIP -CAST-IN-PLACE FTc. -FOOTINe. Nlc -NOT IN CONT~T /<'S -I<OD AND ~ELF CB -CAT~ BASIN FND ~FOUNPATION NTS -NOT TO &cALE S~Tc. -5I4EATI-lING CLC. -CEILINc. F~ ~FIRE l-IYDRANT NO -NUMBE/< ~'" -~'" CT -CE~IC TILE C.A -c.Ac.E. C.Auc.E OC -ON CENTE'" SIM -SIMILA/< CL'" -CLEA'" (ANCE) GALY -C.ALYANIZED 0FNc. -OFENINe. ec -liIOLlD~ CONe -CONe...eTE c.c -c.ENE~L CONT~To", OFF -OFFOSITE SPEC -$F.ECIFICATIONS CMU -CONC...eTE MASON",," UNIT C.B -C.RAB BA'" OF~ -OFFOSITE ~AND sa -&QUA...e CONST -CONST...ucTION ~DW -~AI<DWA...e OD -OUTSIDE DIAMETE'" S STL -ST AINLE&& STEEL CONT -CONTINUE (OUS) HvAC -HEATlNe. I veNTILATION I O~ -OVE~EAD SD -STO!<M DRAIN CI'<& -COURSe AIR CONDITIONING O~D -OVE~EAD DOOR ST...ucT -STRUCTU~L CJ -CON~L JOINT ~T -~EIC.~T PA'" -PA~LLEL SYM -S"T"MMET",," (ICAL) DTL -DETAIL ~C -~ANDICAP PAM -PAMITION THK - T~ICKNESS DIA -DIAMETE'" HM -HOLLOW METAL FYMT -PAVEMENT TOC - TOP OF CONc~TE DIM -DIMENSION ~O'" -HO""ZONTAL PLAM -PLASTIC LAMINATE TOS - TOP OF SLAB D'" -DO~ ~B -~OSE BIBB PL -FLATE TOW - TOP OF WALL DS -DOWNSPOUT INCL -INCLUDE FT -~&&U...e T...eATED T -T...eAD Dwe. -D~WINe. ID -INSIDE DIAMETE'" F'YC -POL YVINYL Cl-ILORIOE TYP - T"T"PICAL DF -D""NKINe. FOUNTAIN INSUL -INSULATION F&F -FOUNDS PE'" SGlUA...e FOOT TOF -TOP OF FOOTINc. ELECT -ELECTRIC (AU INT -'NTE""O'" PSI -FOUNDS FE'" &QUA...e INC~ UNF -UNFINIS~ED EL -ELEvATION INY -INveM PC -~CAST u'" -U",'NAL Ea -EaUAL JST -JOIST PL -~EMY LINE UNO -UNLESS NOTED OT~E...wI&e OCS<lpll27l'2OO1<1:13:nl'M ve"'T YT'" WD UK: ~ WF w... WWF W Y~ "T"D "T"I -YEMICAL - YENT THRU I<OOF -WOOD -WATE'" CLOSET -WA TE'" HEA TE'" -WATe~INe. -WATE'" ...eSISTANT -WELDED WI...e FAB""C -WIDT~. WIDE -"T" A~ ~"T"DI<ANT -"T"A~ D~IN -YARD INLET DRAWING INDEX CS cove", S~EET A~~ITECTU~, C-<2> su",ve"T" C-I C.~DINe.. D~INAc.e AND E~SION CONT~L LI.! SITE PLAN AI.! FL~ PLAN AND ELEYATIONS SITE LOCATION ALL NECE&&AR"T" AND/~ ...eGlUI...eD TESTS. IN$F.ECTIONS SHOP D~WINe. F<EYIEw& AND D~INc. INTE_TATIONS. F<EGlIJI...eD B"T" T~E C.ENE~ CONDITIONS. ~ALL BE EXECUTED B"T" A ...eC.ISTE...eD ARCI-lITECT AND/O'" B"T" A ...eC.ISTE...eD ENc.INEE"" IF NOT. T~E A~ITECT OF ...eco~ AND/ 0'" T~E ENe.INEE'" OF ...eco...o ~ALL BE ~ELD ~A!<MLE&& F~ T~AT ~ION OF T~E WOf'iK IM~PE",""T" EXECUTED. THE INSPECTION A~~ITECT AND/O'" ENe.INEE'" ~ALL BECOME ...e&FONSIBLE FO'" T~OSE IN$F.ECTIONS. DECIIiIIONS AND/~ DOCUMENT INTE_TATIONS MADE AS T~E"T" ...eLATE TO T~E CONT~T DOCUMENTS AND T~EI'" INTENT. . ALL CONSTRUCTION ~ALL MEET ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND MOST IiIT/<INc.eNT ~ALL AFFL "T". . DIMENSIONS C.IYEN F~ MAllON",," ON ARC~ITECTU~L D~WlNe.&. A...e NOMINAL UNLESS OT~E~I&e NOTED. . lOCALED MEASUF<EMENTS OF D~WINe.S S~ALL NOT BE ALLOIIED. . DIMENSION F~ STUD WALLS A...e TO FACE OF STUD AND DIMENSIONS F~ MASON"'"T" WALLS AF<E TO FACE OF BLOCK UNLESS STATED OT~E~I&e. LOM "_..,~ ..".. ._. '<.0 ~~ < <~ o---J 0)~ <0: Lu~ ~~ 0:0) o~ ~~ ~CJ 00: ~~ >-- .q: f--.- C) Vi It.J <: <: ~ LJ .....j .....j :;: 0::: It.J f--.- <: It.J U i fl3 ~ ~ ~ ~ '- '- 8 III ~ 8 ~ i ~ ~ ~ if! ~ ~ ~ ~ ! :a d ,Jl :a d: ~ ~ ~ MORTENSON MA5T<RPlAN c.ovER SHEET Cs cp y 2~" y y cp y cp y o I I I I i II 11 1\ I I I I I I' I , : :1 : I I: I I I I I I' I' I : III III III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I " , I I II I I I[ I I I I I , '[I I I [' , I I' , I II I I : : I : : : : : i : : : : Ii: : : : i : I : : 6" CONCRETE FLOO~ 1--~_L_-1'-~-'-~LI-_L-'-~-'tL-=-='='--I-'L-==L_-=t--I->=-_L=="-'-I'-~L~ , ' ' , CONCRETE COLUMNS ~ Dc:>J6LE T CONCRETE WALL PANELS (TYP,) 8 CD~L'?I~'~ ,,~LAN - PI-lASE ONE . 200'-0" I Dc:>J ~ ~ ---- - CON 6LE T CONCRETE OF PANEL.S nYF.) CRETE CCLUMN5 200'-0" I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I 1- ~1'<U6 ----- CON I 6E~ MEM6~ ~'NG CRETE COLUMNS 0~:~1;~1,~~ ELEVATIONS PI-lASE ONE AI_l.dp &/271'2OOll4:01:41 PM 50'-0" L_ "_~'"" o.,,~ ._. U,O ~> :::: ::::~ Q--J V)~ <0: -<::( I-- C) lulu V) lJJ <: ~~ <: ~ 0: V) LJj --J --J Q~ s: 0::: ~~ lJJ I-- <: lJJ u 0 ~CJ 00: ~~ >- - I &1 ~ I ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ c ~ J ~ ~ ~ 1 ! ~ ~ <il ! ~ .t ~ ~ 0: MORTENSON MASTERPLAN FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATIONS A1.l ::: ::: := = :J C ::: ::: - - - - 9 a "' r 50'-0" c= ::: ::: - - ::: ::: - - 'j 9 a "' < <~ Q--J 0)~ <0: <::J:: I-- C) lulu V) Lu <': hh <': ,os. ~ Cl.f .~O8,!)4 0:0) LJj -..J -..J Q~ s: 0::: ~~ Lu I-- <': Lu u 0 ~CJ 00: ~~ >-- 905.57 ,,, 902.31 '0 902.37 '0 588'19' 38"W 906.62 ~..'90,.5i~"~ SWL . SWL qO .~~'J . ~attt'5 U) 902" . 'OR .902.14 .0' ,,~~ G~" 8"PINE'rJ:.01 TO"pINE 901.01 '5"- '5"- gQ5.04 904.75 902.6 . ^' EX. VALLEY GUTTER TO REMAIN ~rENO x 903.0 x 902.5 "b v .~~ .~i;~ .~~ .:r.75 904.67 '~1 .tOT".19 903.67 '~1 .~~2.95 X 903.0 903.24 '" 905.22 '~1 904.95 +(;JtA" UJ (") 0 en 0 d )> lO ~ IN 0 Z rTl 9 ~ 06>0 1 IN ..j:> N I\J 0 CO -I '--J J: ~ g04.54 "" m ".'14 1 Z 0 ~ J: 906.40 '811 906,55 '~1 ,,'0 OJ 906.20 '~1 EX. VALLEY GUTTER TO REMAIN Q) !::::l ~ .96 " 5.e,6"PINE CHAIN K FENCE "0 90B 907.48 907.88 10.9" '" ,~ 910.6\ . CLRO 911.23 4ID 910.09 'C\.RO 910.64 '" ,~ 908.45 '0 '0 . ~O'< ,os.'" 908.70 01.73 .'tm .m85 .m-89 08.11 909.75 .""" OClRO 906.98 N88'19'38"E STREET CEDE 909.49 ~.69 908.45 9 77 9OS.92 , 0 906..' '0 907.5 '0 ,os.06 '0 906 906.00 o ~10.J2 ~'N~ . I fil ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . <fi' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e J: ill ~ e <.> "- MORTENSON MA5TfRPLAN SITE SURVEY C 0 CD~~~~" ,~~.~~EY Cl.dp1lI27/2OOlJ4:1(t#PM () en )> :t z P ~ N o -I ::I: ~ m z o ~ ::I: ~ (J CD~~~~" !:;_~N 90<1. cfr e '"A$ 2 "BIRCH ~ M Iii :;;c ~ 12"PINE 48'-0" 10"PINE T2"PINE 8"PINE . TO" NE BO <.d{0e< ( . m u '" . o o c ] in Concrete Curb~ --' . S"PINE 200' 0" . S"PINE "'. o J: :> Z r Z ^ -., '" Concrete Wall with Hanel Rail S"PINE . o '" 5 "PINE . S"PINE 8 "PINE . Concrete Curb LINK FENCE 6" CHAIN 9 "PINE 10"PINE IO"PINE 12"PINE TO"PINE T2"PINE 8"PINE 8"PINE "PINE 6"PINE 6"PINE TO "PINE CEDER STREET ~ "I I I LI.I PI-IASE ONE BUILDING NEW DRIVE 1&.3 1&.3 !;.!; 0!:~:11~;' SITE SECTION Ll.l,dplll27f200S4'UtOifM bO' 0" ~ q ~ q ~ GV FRONT AGE R AD e.1iZ1 e.<;l,:\ 1&.1&11.41 !;21 '" o q I! (l LON "~~,~ ""., ...." ,.~ ~~ < <~ O--J V)~ <ct <:;:( f-.- a lulu Vi lJ.J , <: ~~ <: ~ ctV) wj ---J ---J O~ :;: Cl::: ~~ lJ.J f-.- <: I lJ.J u 0 ~CJ Oct ~<::::C >- i 1il ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ilJ 8 ilJ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l.1! f ~ e ~ t "- '" - MORIDlSON MASTERPLAN SITE PLAN LL1 ~ ,0'- 1/4" EXISTING TREES Grovel Road . e.11 1&.41 ALL ELEVATION MApi;!K5 ARE AT FLUS. ~g)(2)' TOTAL SITE AREA (ouflIideROW): EXISTING HARDCOVER: % HARDCOVER: I I I I I L------- I I I I I L 265.383 sq. fl. 6.09 acres 183.908 sq. ft. 4.22 acres 69.3% -- ---- ----- I I I I I L----- SUBTRACTED HARDCOVER: 4,460 SF ADDED HARDCOVER: 8189 SF DIFFERENCE: 3,729 SF MORE HARDCOVER 3.7291265.383 ".41" ~ e,189 sq. ft. ---- ----- --- ----- TOTAL SITE AREA (_ide ROW): PROPOSED HARDCOVER: % HARDCOVER: ----- 30 15 n-_ NORm 15 30 SCAlE IN FEEr 265.383 sq. fl. 6.09 acres 187.648 sq. ft. 4.30 acres 70.6% 60 . REVISIONS u~ Z... -::!.. _N .....~ C/)e;; -lil ~~ O~ C)i!' o::~ W~ al~ W~ O::~ ::elll .....5 <(~ (/)~ ....OI'oS 1I6<~ .,.'" 1<1< <l' ,- ~ -H"': t+ ~ (I) ...... . ... ' ~ (Q ~ :: ~ j <l' "'.,.. '. .fr 1</ ,'" a"Ol D~'" --- a:: o LLeo (/)0 0<.0 -.J~ <(0 Oz a::<( W-.J >il. Ow Of- 0- cr::(/) <( I z o t5 ::> i o ~.!l u 0 ~ 18~ ,.... . ~ 2 c: Z i8 Ii .- 8::l W >:E 1--l3<Ji a:::~,l;=~ o<o~c; :ECDNJ!l< ..S:!NC ~CI)co~ U. <0 o w a::: ~ w a::: Q. DRAWN J.M.L. CHECKED R.B.'" DATE Il8I2llI08 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO. 60387-001 FILE: BASE CENTERVlLlE.DWIl TOWNSHIP - RANGE - SECTION 24-31.22 ANOKA COUNTY BOOK: 163 PAGE:26 SHEET 1 OF 1 , REVISIONS RESTORATION: ~~ All DISTURBED AREAS WITH It TOe- OF 2. SEED AU. DtSTURBED AREAS WITH t.NX1T MIXTURE NJ 500 AT A RATE OF 100L8SJACREAHDFERTLJZEWITH . 200-tOA7 tOOLBSJACRE. S. W,.CH'MTH TYPE 1 AT A RATE OF 2 TONSIACREAND DISC ANCftC)R1.-El:MTB.Y AFTER PlACEMENT. USE EMI.LSK)N BlANKET ON ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 3" (FT~ . 4. PlACE SL T FENCE AROUND ALL STORM SEWER IfoI.ETS AND MAINTAIN lJN1L STREET CONSTRUCT1ON IS COMPLET!D. 5. MAlNTAlN AU. SILT FENCE UNTIL nR=HASBEEN ESTA8LISHED. 6. RESTORATla4 WQRKwu. BE COMPLETED WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DRADlNG CC*Pl.ETION. SilT FENCE DETAil 51 ANDARD DEl AilS NOTES. 1"'ROCKSlZESHOULO BE \" TOTJIISlltSUCH/lE,M'!OOT CA.l ORCA- 2COURSEN:lGm:GATE 2. A GEOTEXTlLE FABRIC MA" 8E USEOUt.DER Tw€ RDCl( TO PREVENT MIGRATION OF 11-'E UNClERLYING SOL NTO THE STONE NOTES ~"Xfl"TRENCHAlONG HIE NTENDED FENCE LM ~~.ALL PQSTS INTO THE GROUND ATniE tx::JNNHUSl;)EOFnlE 3. WIRE FENCING PEl{ HENNE"'N COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MANUAL 'oWl.E lESH "'-ISTBE A ~=-~~~~~~A~~NOANDNC MORET"KAN3!I'"AaOVETl-lE ~~~;~FENCE ON THE UPt<U.l SCJEALONG THeFENCElJo<E 5. WOOD POSnl MAY BE SPACED UP TO ~ FEET W'N'Cf FWRE Il'ESH liS NOT USED TO SIJF>PORT THE FABRK:. FWIlEKSH IS 1JSE01O ~~~T THE FABRK: STEEL POSTS lrAAY BE SPACED UP TO 8FEET II. REMOVE SILT FENCE AFTER TURF IS ESTA8....tSMED. o! Z.... -... N -lll ~- (J); -~ ::>. O~_ C>~ ~~ W~ lll~ I ~ W~ ~li! Im ~~ <(g (J)~ NORlH 3. fHEROCKENrRN<CE8ERIofS"Al..l.W.~A~ 0Ef'THOF2 fEHANDA.MAA:llIlUIol6t.OPE0F.;1. 40 20 pq 20 40 80 STANDARD DETAILS ROCK ENTRANCE BERM SCALE IN FEET I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , \ \ ) / ~y Owner. R_1n Propert/eIt P...o. 24-Jl-22-JJ-0017 I ,..... I ,............... f EXISTING CONTOUR I , ,............. , ......... J r....... .................................... Il!l" PROJECT MANAGER: ....- -~ 700 MeIldDw lan8 Nortl --..... ph 783-287-6114 .....:Bmy.MolQllll......tl.._..com PROJECT ARCHITECT: JolI_ -""""''''- P.O. Beam1. ......-..... ph81z.664..811C12 ....~CXIm PROJECT CIVIL ENGINEER -- -'"" 1&0 80utI Bma.y WIIyDIIi.~!55381 phll5M76<<lOO .....:rnaIMi.......CDnl PARK INDUSTRIAL ROYAL f"'C'i-'" 0SSIj~ ....,'IJ..\~O _ 'O\\~. .1'"'" PRfJI'ERTY 0ItNER: J Ii L 2016, UC PJ.D. ~-~2 PRfJI'ERTY 0ItNER: ROYAL ~ RFAL7Y. INC PJ.D. 24-S1-22-->>-DDtS .~." ~fi"-G'2.- O\~...,S0 W\,,'C\- _G uR'if'C(:r 'tJ..\t;.IOiJ'SS ~-e\",\"0 .{0\,-5 lIlf~ ,/ ,- . "'+... f('" f+. ~ en '\',' '" (t, 1i:' Q:" ~ '. ,. .t "'/~Nil D"-'" ,CO .,..... .,..., r::....--------- .\'!'P' '_/ ~~ ---- .-..... ' ~'~-~:_-=---~ .ti:. Rr -,::i:.. ..:-==;~ 902.6 . _ _'_ __ _ _ _ -- -. - -.- -- - - - --"1' - -.- -- -'I.~ - - - ...QIO. , ' EX. VALI.EY .>UT1'ER .'0 R:MA N ' -=_--.o~--ee-.;;...:7-~ -.'- I~"'~ .!!f"!!ll'" - --- ~-- ' \ "C'" 00':; 5'J~ \. ~\l"'\~ " .~ ...j.6\.1."'" .!l\'''','''''' , " " " i"" _an PROPOSED CONTOUR EoP,:- "' I f I z ~ o ~ (/) 000< O::OLL WtOW RJU ~oZ wZ< (9<(Z <(..-lW Zo..t- _ Z <1.......:<( 0::0-.: 00::"::: .1- Z (9Z0 zOcn -OZ o W <( t- o:: ex:: (9 0 ~ PfilfJPERTY 0ItNER: QTY OF aN1ERWUE p./J). H-S7-22-->>-DDtfJ .~ .~ z o ~ :J ~ z 8 ~~ z z U) o G)Gl~ Cf) I ::I! C zlll16.-5 wj!!>::i!u 1--C<SlIl a:-c.<:=~ ~<Siig oCG)N",,< ..""N C 15cna;c?3 u.. co Cl W f W a: II.. -..i iP .!ll'" ~ "1 I ...".. f..... C '''AIrj , II ~n f~ It: 1\ ~ ...... : l,... l""" I' , I .,....: ~\,.... .f''' Cl! ~U:.- ..... : ,~~---J It!''~~~<~~" ....~- r~~ r.rt i- 1 ~-'\{7J: !If"" EXISTING CONTOUR i; $: 1 < PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE -llilI..... ""- .....~.......... .I!""'. )~ ..... / / / / / / /.~ ~~ap PfilfJPERTY 0ItNER: QTY OF CEN7ER1<<lE p./J). H-S7-22-JS-D0Q2 .!""" , / / / / / fJ-':..r'_ _ ~e:." - ';:,.......~--= -- ~~ fp.,C€.r -(i.51j~ o...Icftf- ~COl~ -- -- 1 , ---_/ , , , ( !..._____/' I .I DRAWN J.M.L CHECKED R.S.M. DATE 08I2tlIll8 SCAlE AS SHOWN J06 NO. 8Q36HlO1 FilE: BASE_CENTERVllLE.DWG TOWNSHIp. RANGE - SECTION 24-31-22 ANOKA COUNTY BOOK: 163 PAGE:26 SHEET 1 OF 1 ~ EOP ,~_,:",,,"(;i(. . -f;-----':' ", <~;" ';>:'~ .. ...~~'.'~!l- ......~ .:,;;:--~P:-;_____~,.-.tOI------~..w ~,n,. ll:I' ------------------------------- EOI' '-. ., '" . ~e- ~-=~,,---- ---- - .~~ .~ -111;'" __ . -- 1m" -:r---- - - _!- - - -:.... .W .~ CEDE -..: STREET ~ ~., /- // =.:f!''' .___n__ i ! , i-r .~,.. ------ ...... Praport)' 0.-. _J.~ PJ.D. 25-31-22-22-0005 .1"'"' -___ _ ===f:::.m.::.. -'':::''-:::'..... - '':::'~. , ~y- _ B. _ AudRy L. Rud PJ.D. 25-Jl-22-22-oCJOl1 1 .!""'" ~y 0IIner: lie Loe _ Shoua T. Loe P.Lo. 25-31-22-22-llOD2 ~yo.-. -~ P.LO. 25-31-22-22-0017 Praport)' 0.-. DlrlcJ._ P.LD. 25-31-22-22-00II8 CITY OF CENTERVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 5, 2008 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission held its regularly scheduled meeting on August 5, 2008, at 6:30 p.m. PRESENT: Chair Brian Hanson Commissioner Roland Parucci A Commissioner Mark Pangell m@rv!J@W Comm~ss~oner Darrin Mosher ~ ~ f;;\ rQ) rQ) u . 0 CommIssIoner D. Love @~ frJlY IY Commissioner Thomas Wood ABSENT: Commissioner Ben Fehrenbacher COUNCIL: Council Member Broussard-Vickers STAFF: City Administrator Dallas Larson I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Hanson called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. 1. Roll Call II. APPEARANCES/PRESENT A TION(S) None III. PUBLIC HEARING(S) None IV. OLD BUSINESS None V. NEW BUSINESS 1. Mr. Hatem Oamhieh. 7251 Clearwater Drive. Request for Variance to Enlarge Garage to Include a Third-Stall Extending into the Side DrainagelUtility Easement Mr. Qamhieh stated that there is 70 feet from the front of his house to the street. He would like to build another garage stall on the west side of his current garage. He has measured several times and stated that would still leave an easement of 6'6", so he is requesting a variance of 3'6"- 4' from the required 10' easement. He is currently using the space on the Page 1 of8 City of Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission August 5, 2008 west side of the garage for parking a car and/or his camper - Having the garage extended instead would look a lot better. His neighbor does not have an issue with it. This would be 18' 4" from his neighbor's house. When the house was built, it was shifted to the back to make it fit on the property. Commissioner Love stated that they would have to show that there was an actual hardship. Mr. Qamhieh replied that the addition could not be done on the east side of his house, because the creek comes too close to the house. The creek also cuts out a lot of his back yard. Chairman Hanson stated that they should have an actual survey before approving a Variance. He inquired whether the house could have been built anywhere else on the lot. Commissioner Love stated that, if the house could not have been placed anywhere else on the lot, then there is a hardship. However, if Mr. Qamhieh bought house as is, he bought the house with the hardship. Mr. Qamhieh stated that the face of the house is twisted to make it fit on the lot. He stated that there is a 4 foot retaining wall close to the creek on the east side of his property, and there is a lot of erosion that is coming closer to his house because of the creek. The creek expands every time there is a large storm. City Administrator Larson stated that the Commission's next step would be a Public Hearing, but they do need to have a survey. They have to know for sure if it will still have a 6' 6" easement. He also stated that it could be set back another 2 feet to allow for some extra room. Commissioner Parucci inquired as to what the process is now. City Administrator Larson replied that they would not vote at this meeting. They would have to have a Public Hearing first. He added that it sounds like the neighbor does not have a concern, but it still requires a Public Hearing. Mr. Qamhieh proceeded to explain that he is holding up on roofing his house, which is needed because of storm damage. He stated that it would be more of a value to do the roof at the same time as the garage extension. He added that he would use the same material on the addition as on the rest of the house, so it would be consistent across the front. Councilmember Broussard-Vickers pointed out the five conditions that need to be satisfied for approval of this request, which could be found in the Councilmember's packets. She stated that the only condition that is in question is number one. She reported that they have not done very many variances. But they did have another person, with a similar situation as Mr. Qamhieh, where a variance was approved. There was another case where the person wanted an addition. This variance did not get approved, because the person could have had a 12-foot addition, but instead wanted a 14-foot addition. Again, it came down to whether it could be considered as a hardship. Page 2 of8 City of Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission August 5, 2008 Chair Hanson stated that Mr. Qamhieh talked about putting in a concrete driveway also and inquired whether that would also need a variance. City Administrator Larson stated that driveways have to be 5 feet from the property line, so that section would not require a variance. Mr. Qamhieh stated that he had done the measurements 10 times but, if the Commission wanted him to, he would have a survey done. Chair Hanson replied that the Commission is not denying Mr. Qamhieh's efficiency, but they need to have a legal document. He continued that, even if Mr. Qamhieh's measurements were off just a little bit, it could make a big difference down the road. The Commission has to make sure they have everything covered. City Administrator Larson stated that it could make a big difference where the house is actually sitting on the lot. Mr. Qamhieh stated that 2/3 of his property is not usable. He added again that his neighbor does not have an issue with it. Councilmember Broussard-Vickers suggested that, before Mr. Qamhieh goes forward with the expense of a survey, the Commission should have a consensus that he otherwise meets all 5 of the conditions. If the Commission does not believe he meets all 5 of the conditions, then he should not have to go through the expense of a survey. She added the following for the Commission to consider: The style of the house, and the way it was built, created the situation as it is now. Mr. Qamhieh bought the house the way it is. If, after the survey, Mr. Qamhieh still has 3-4 feet left for the easement, would the Commission consider that to be sufficient? Commissioner Pangell stated that he would be comfortable having a 4-foot easement. He stated that they had a situation with a Rice Creek lot, where a variance was allowed so the house could be fit into the lot, which would otherwise have been an unusable lot. He added that that there is now precedence. City Administrator Larson replied that there is a difference between not being able to build a house on a lot vs. adding to a garage. Commissioner Pangell stated that there were already houses in the City with shorter than required easements, so it is not an unheard of situation. He stated that they just needed to get verification that the neighbor did not have a problem with it. Commissioner Parucci stated that he agreed with Commissioner Pangell, and he IS comfortable with granting a variance also. Page 3 of 8 City of Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission August 5, 2008 City Administrator Larson stated that they need to be able to include in their approval that there is something different about this case than with the others in the future. Discussion ensued. Chair Hanson stated that the creek, which takes up a lot of Mr. Qamhich's property, makes it difficult. It does not give him much of a choice. Commissioner Parucci inquired whether the Commission would grant the variance if the survey proved to be what Mr. Qamhich clams. City Administrator Larson stated that they need to be careful not to appear like they are making a decision. He suggested that they say that they are inclined to see hardship and leave it as that. Mr. Qamhich stated that he understands what the Commission is saying. He stated that he does not want to spend money on the survey, and then have the Commission say he cannot do it. He added that he would like to make this improvement, because he would like to stay in his present house and the present area. Discussion ensued. City Administrator Larson stated that the next step would be to schedule the Public Hearing. Motion made bv Commissioner Wood. seconded bv Commissioner Love. to 20 forward with a Public Hearin!! to consider Mr. Hatem Oamhieh's reQuest for a Variance to enlar!!e the !!ara!!e at 7251 Clearwater Drive to include a third-stall extendin!! into the side draina!!e/utilitv easement. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. City Administrator Larson told Mr. Qamhich that, before the Public Hearing, the City would need to receive the fees relating to the Permit Application. Mr. Qamhich replied that the fees would be submitted by that time. Councilmember Broussard-Vickers stated that she is struggling with defining a third garage stall as a hardship. She stated that the rest of it fits all the conditions. She added that she would like the City Attorney and the City Council to take a look at it. Chair Hanson asked City Administrator Larson to get the legal survey to the Planning Commission ahead of time, to give them time to look at it before the Public Hearing. City Administrator Larson stated that he would call Mr. Qamhieh in the morning, and ask him to get the survey before the Public Hearing was scheduled. They could then identify findings to support the variance. Discussion ensued. Page 4 of8 City of Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission August 5, 2008 Chair Hanson stated that the Commission will deal with this issue further when they get the survey. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. Code Amendments a. Chapter 150-152 Signs City Administrator Larson discussed (M) under Section 152.15, General Regulations, on Page 18, and the 1,000-foot restriction. He stated that using the 1,000-foot restriction, you could theoretically get a billboard. He added that another condition is that it has to be on property with a principal structure. Councilmember Broussard-Vickers inquired about the restrictions on size. City Administrator Larson stated that they do not currently have a restriction on the size of billboards, but they could decide to add a size restriction. City Administrator Larson stated that freestanding signs cannot exceed 200 square feet in area and 35 feet in height and cannot be placed within ten feet of any street right of way. Councilmember Broussard-Vickers stated that she would not like to see a 10 by 20 foot sign across the street from the City Council building. She stated that the bank sign is about 35 feet in height. She added that they could limit the size of billboards by saying they could not be bigger than "X" square feet. Commissioner Love stated that they would not want to limit what businesses could come Ill. Councilmember Broussard-Vickers inquired whether the Commission wanted to put a limitation on a billboard size. City Administrator Larson stated that it would be easier to allow them, in limited circumstances, than to not allow them at all. He stated that not allowing them at all would be more likely to be challenged in a Court of Law than having specific restrictions on them. He added that they could not say a billboard would have to be smaller than a free- standing sign, but they could restrict them to being the same size as a freestanding sign. City Administrator Larson stated that there are places that regulate free-standing signs in conjunction with other signs, where 200 square feet is in addition to the 10%. City Administrator Larson stated that moving messages on signs should stay constant for at least 7 seconds. He stated that Blaine has 7 seconds as their minimum. The Commission agreed. Discussion ensued. Page 5 of8