HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-09-11 CC Packet
COUNCIL MEETING
L
,~NESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11,2002
6:~0 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER / '~/" "
1. Roll Call (.~vY ~//
APPROVAL OF AG~
;'\
\?
n.
III.
A W ARDS/PRESENTATIONS/APPEARANCES
,.A. Dr. John Christiansen (Superintendent ISD 12) - Operating Levy ,..; .
(November Ballot), .)- ~~)'
~., ILVfc/ <;W-UA<-"€-'t .. '-I--lCLLlfl. 0....<1 ~4:--" U0'6 I ~r., . P
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS / '..\.P r:r. 4' " .
. . ^~ ~\ ~{''Vv
COUNCIL BUSINESS ~ A ~0/CiJ.\f wX~ -<6
{O l-z, \(vIY if\
Mr. Bill Bisek. Kelly's Komer - Noise Permit {equest (Octoberfest ~ . h-U~
Rock'n Hollywoods) ~, fur ~I- a M-<:td. '7.1 &el 191fP.-e Packer ",'(JU f* ..
.- :>f4i:~ . a.'J4.LM-I-" '
21st Avenue Joint Powers Agreement with Lino Lakes~ '/'ifi /0 v "-'/{Uwo '" '>"'~~""'" :
Resolution #02-037, Ordering and Receiving of a Feasibility Report ~-s.~ ~,~ Ciit'
Submitted by the City of Lino Lakes' Engineering Firm (TKDA), Orderin ~t~t~O/
he City ofCenterville's EngiI!eering Firm (Bonestroo) to Review the Same,' Y
ork Jointly/Cooperatively .withEach Other in Regards to City I
Specifications & C~ng fOr a Pub)i~~g on Street and" S~~~er. fv....?C'tJ .
Impr?vem~nts-21 Avenue .~ tWPfove CcMjl~ ~,:t,,-,,",?rwJ'1)<~~IS- '1..0
ConsIder~tion of Parks & RecreatIon Recommendations" ~, .Ii, I., I.
Il(( Resolution #02-038, FundTransfers - Oversizing .~ S/.0ed\P<j/IJa.l.f7C>-- ..,-- 0
lL Resolution #02-039, Fund Trans(ers - 2002 Budgeted Enterprise Funds c i;--+ d' Z;....
. '7, 601.11 ~-J~":Au)..-- '6c.~<- ,~1...; "?/)fl f 00 ~y. ~
VIJ CONSENT AGENDA . ~,' yo - < .
,,:w(\~ q, (f). Qv..<.ldc.- ~+- fY2'j"':C..f~ .
,,\'" I. J Or pl. City of Centerville August 29, 2002 through Septembe~O-"~~Oill~::' _"
\- 1\'\ \X' 2. Centennial Fire District September 3, 2002 Claims!.-\ .. c;;;.. L ^
\ lUort-Scc"e,dr- -. -, \
VU. AP~ROV AL OF COUNCIL MINUTES \ ~'@)};" _ _ ~ !
'\I)JPI~{~~'1 August 28, 2002 Council Minutes \ If/;l~ . ~\Y ,
tv " 1/~l>
VIll. ANNOUNCEMENTSIUPDATES '\
. ~n..._
1540 Peltier Lake Drive (Hoeft) ~ (!.e l!:f>;l< fl.J; )u.<'dJ I&.ftr.0 1#-~-;"';'lUk.
j,lJiil (f r ) UJfrt.-u',L
Capital Projects (Ellen)
Building Permit Fee Review (Update - KimlPaultferesa)'
Pending Issues" ' '
~
v.
"^
l:1 1.
~~2.
~
. ~-c---i
#
~''1 ~'
~C
u(
);Z
~
4.
~.
ADJOURNMENT
IX.
'J(Jr 0
~\;~~ ~ ,1:)
/7
,
,L~
V ~ \O( ~
~~ ~ .~
r/ ,,,u "v~ ~
oG. '/-); \f'Jt . I)\t
/(, ~ -1. V" ~~
rl~JY '"
11,1 "." l rV V \i !\/V
v~ ,'~" ,r
Q,~ /)ci'.tv' c/ "
,?lY (; .;
~b
.
'Date: qjl/ZOO 2--
e terviffe 1880 Main Street · Centeruilfe, M9{ 55038
'EstabfisIid1857 (651)429-3232 . J'~(651)429-8629
~~~- I
~ +ta af~~~ ~ I
t{ )L~ ~~~f ~ ~. :
I
=~JZJ ~ ~~
tod~ 7Ju ~?~ ~ I
~fu~ CJx Iv .~ ~:
r. '
#3 4-~ '-!1 .
;;~;J~~~
. (u . "~~ ~uv- ~
tL~.P' -~~
~~J
"
"tervi{{e
'EstaJj[isfiecC 1857
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
1880 'Main Street . Centervi((e, 'M2{ 55038
(651) 429-3232 .:Fa:( (651) 429-8629
RESOLUTION #02 - 037
RESOLUTION ORDERING AND RECEIVING OF A FEASffiILITY REPORT
SUBMITTED BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKE'S ENGINEERING FIRM (TKDA)'m
ORDERING THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE'S ENGINEERING FIRM
(BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOC.) TO REVIEW THE SAME,
WORK JOINTLY/COOPERATIVELY WITH EACH OTHER IN REGARDS TO
CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET
AND STORM SEWER
IMPROVEMENTS-21sT AVENUE
WHEREAS, pursuant to numerous meetings with affected property owners, appraisals of
the affected property owners property and consideration of Councils from both
communities and the current condition of said roadway; and
WHEREAS, several reports have been ordered by the City of Lino Lakes and a
cooperative effort has been made by both communities to work towards the above stated
intent; and
WHEREAS, the City ofCenterville is ordering the City ofCenterville's engineering firm,
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Assoc_, to review the most recently submitted feasibility
study prepared by TKDA and customize it according to the City of Centerville's
specifications pursuant to their motion of June 26, 2002; and
WHEREAS, said report was received by the City Council at its regularly scheduled
meeting of September 11, 2002; and
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is
necessary, cost-effective and feasible; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA:
1. The City Council will consider the improvement of such street in
accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all
or a portion of the cost of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of
$166,500.
2_ A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 25th
day of September, 2002 in the council chambers of the city hall located at
1880 Main Street commencing at 6:30 p.m. and the clerk shall give mailed
and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by
law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council this 11th day of September, 2002.
Attest
Mayor
City Clerk
*'^"
iY/l
~I.-.vr'
"IvF' \/woJ).'?
, .(/ ur 'P~tj\
:~ yJrJ y,~ vI:,O
,
The Committee recommended to Council the designation of approximately $26,000 in
charitable gambling funds for the renovation of the existing warming house at Laurie
LaMotte Memorial Park The Centerville Lion's have contacted architects from
Bruggeman Companies, at their cost, to commence concept plans for renovating the
warming house and anticipate same being available in October.
~.1
TO:
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM:
Teresa Bender, City Cler~ ~
SUBJECT:
Parks & Recreation Recommendations
DATE:
September 6, 2002
~ /
The Committee also recommended to Council the directing of the City Administrator to . 1ft \ \If'
work in conjunction with Committee Member Peterson, as a representative of the Parks lf~lll(."~
& Recreation Committee, to submit a request for funding application to the Dead Broke !j;\i
Saddle Club in the amount of$I,OOO for the purchase ofa set of bleachers to be installed l\. 0
at Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park and an additional application to the Spring Lake Park /
Lion's Club in the amount of $2000 for the purchase of bike racks for all five (5) parks in
Centerville.
_a
Centerville Lions Club
Sept. 3, 2002
To:
City of Centerville Park and Recreation Committee
From:
Centerville Lions Club
Re:
Laurie Lamotte Park Structure
In continuation of our conversation from your August Park and Rec meeting,
the Centerville Lions Club has contacted the Architects for Bruggeman
Companies to start a couple of design scenarios for expanding and
remodeling of the existing park building. Hopefully we will have these
drawings in our possession by the October Park and Rec meeting.
We look forward to meeting with the Park and Rec committee in October
and presenting these design options.
Respectfully Yours,
b\-
Lion President Tom Peil
Centerville Lions Club
1695 Main St. #201 Centerville, MN 55038
I--
I ...
.
I
I
'tervi{{e
'Estafiis/ied 1857
1880 :Main Street . Centerviife, <M:J{ 55038
, (651) 429-3232 .:Fa>( (651) 429-8629
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTYOFANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
RESOLUTION #02 - 038
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TRANSFERRING OF FUNDS
(WATER/SEWER FUNDS TO PROJECT FUNDS) FOR REIMBURSEMENT
FOR OVERSIZING OF UTILITIES
WHEREAS, pursuant to Council receiving documentation from the Finance Director and
reviewing same; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Council's consideration and the above stated information; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA:
1_ Hereby authorizes the Finance Director to transfer funds per attached
Exhibit A
Attachment: September 11, 2002 Memo from Finance Director and associated
documentation.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council this 11th day of September, 2002.
Attest
Mayor
City Clerk
'"'
,
.
tervi[[e
'Esta6fisfted 1857
FUND TRANSFERS
OVERSIZING PROJECTS
CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL
Date: September 11, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Ms. Kim Moore-Sykes, City Administrator
From: Ellen Paulseth, Finance Director
Re: Capital Projects
Following are the amounts calculated by the city engineer for oversizing of utilities on
various capital projects. As part of the capital projects clean-up effort, transfers should
be made from the appropriate utility fund for the city's share of the project.
From Fund: To Fund:
Water $159,807 Woods of Clearwater Creek (looping credit) $ 6,550
Eagle Pass I (watermain oversize) $37,307
Royal Oaks Industrial (city share of water) $67,495
Center Villa (watermain oversize) $25,800
Hunter's Crossing (watermain oversize) $21,598
Pheasant Marsh $11,349
Sewer $ 9,521 Hunter's Crossing (sanitary sewer oversize) $ 9,521
.,.
..u~
\l (1\1'. \,,0-'7 ok N#jJ;L
\\1UU ~ EXIDBITB
CASH FEES
L Stormwater Fee
$6,747.85
2. Park Dedication Fee
$7,500.00
3. Trail Dedication Fee
$1,500.00
4. Final Plat Filing
$ 200.00
5. Administration Fees $lOOILot
$1,000.00
6. Cul-de-sac replacement fee
$10,000.00
Total
$26,947. -
~~
Less Watermain Looping Credit
Total Cash Fees
$20,397.85
SECURITIES
L Street and Utility Improvements
$2L975.00
2. Private Improvements (Paragraph AI)
$37,575.00
.'559,550.00 .
Total Irrevocable Letter of Credit
~"""~,'+'''''''''!'!;1'j
<."'-'\';'~':~
"-~'~...."-"*"'''''-'
~~~~~~~~~
2 ~ - 0 ~ c ~ ~
* ~
~ ~
"','
It:;:::::~ :,:;~';:;':;;:;~~~:i~~:::~
~ ~
~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 : ~
~--~*~~
= =-.g .;;:;
'" i:.y
-0;;,.. -,::.""..,
~-'G '\
'\ ,)'
- g: ~ ~s:~ s
-::;i.""'; ;C;'i#
~ ~:~ ~)=<o_
S ~ ~\i-
i ;;;>,'
"
f&\j
I r;:: i
r ~~ I
--~ /
'.J'
:jl:
""
~
~ ~
8jgt g g g ~ ~ g ~ gl
~f""';~~'o ~ ~ g ~ 0
gt~t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~
,..:;- .oj;:i i:::: r--:=:: ~.
1
tnl
I
"
oc~
~I
cY)\
,
o
-n
\j ,
~
O<:l
~~'" ggg~:?;~~
~~~~~~~~r::~~"'g
,...; g v...,;::: ..; ~ ..;
"
;;;
~-
~
~
~
~
a
<a
lr'-
~
~
1\
h
rf)
"-
-.:J--
'l5
II
;;;.,y' \~
~~ggE!c:~gg~g:~~
N Q ~ ~ 8 g g ~ ~ ~ ~
;0.5. e;... ~ 0-. ..." t",
g g ~ g g g
~ ....; co C v-;
;g '" ~ "=:" ~
:i. ...,.
g c c:
..0 r...: r--
0,
"
;l
~
~ v =
.....; ...;
o
a
(\ ;
; ~ ~ ~ 5 ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
;::> 0 2,
;; ~ ; ~
~ ~
o 0
2;-~
[I
V)
o .lfi
~~i~,:~":-~::::::~:
~ ~
o -0
6c
'''f
''I.(
LL
~n\
'<
g g g :3 g ~ :3 g
ci d 0 _ _ ::: 0 ~
o "
Q. D
0: d
g ~ g
coo
o
o
;;;
g g
::;:; d
4:-
-l
..-1
~o
~
cJOj
'7
Ci-
~g~~ggl$~ggo~
o 0 0 0 C d 0 ~ 0 0 d d 0
" "
ci ;
" "
" "
<::i 0
()
\jl
\fl
r()
-0
'>
q....
c~gg",~gg~g~og
~~~~~~.~g~~~~~
,....,"'~~..,;~.~eO::!- 'in";";
"
~
s;
-;f
~
~
~g~~ 5
~ ~ ~ ~ - ~
i i
..... ggg5:~g
~. ~ ~ g $ g 8 a Q
_, ,_ _ :>\ '>0. '<T \0 ':. ,- "!.
'2- "'" :i.... N- <.; t"'l
~~,
~ 8 ~{~~ Q1bi2~c 0 0 C ~ ~ 0 C
~ _ 2J fi ~ ~it ~ ""! ; ;:: !:: ~ S ;
'" v'" 'C> ~W1O"l M ~
\, '"y
''''-'''''~'
" -
-.
.....
-rJ
N
N
-
-
-
N
C>a
OQ
'-
o~~g12gi2g~g8~2
~g:l=i..o.og~;:;o('"-::::;:>-:
N_ In -.
'"
~
~
""~!"~\.
r-r'-..__'
'0,
(~f
\"""-"
. ,
\ ! i
'~
~~g8ggggg8~~C5
g g ~ g g g g ~ g ~ ~
<c;. ~"" ~ 0'1 '"
~;i -~~~~~~;~gd~~
<::>_~- ~ ~;;;g r-
'" '" .......,. ~
"
~
~
o
o
~
N
"
"'
!-'"'~
l; l\Ji,
'~'t""!a
~\
~~"
~
~"",\
''. \\
~--r
~\)
~ ~ ~ s s s ~ ~ s ~ _ 0 ~
I
...
c~
'",.
-~)
~\~
, ~
! W
I ~i
i, G~:
i ~ .
i0-0~
:~\OIO\
I C>o<:sl,62"
I - \1' -'
! r{ CJlv)-( ,
i f\) ('~ \ ~
i i
i 1
i
,
!
i
I
,
I
I
!
i
l
S:3a~~~;}~
< :=...:.:. < < "'" <
t.:.l .....: ....: _ w ~ J,:j c:l
-<
'"
-"
-<
E- 2.:
~ ~
5 ~
6 13
" u
'" '"
~
z
g 2
~ g
~ u
" ~
f-
~ 0
~ ;;
~ ~
s Z
C: '""
~ ~
~ r;:
"
f-
'"
-"
"-
~ ;;
f- 0
c U
f- "
~
Z '"
3 g
@ ;;!.
E: tl
< tr.
:?; 1:;
c:::: t=l
N D
'" -<
-" ~
" z
Cl ::=l
:; g
R 5:
o
in
o
"
=>
u
~ <
"
G z
~ ~ 0
~ c;: ~.
C ttl ,.
U U ~ >-
w;;: , i-
s: 0::: Z ,_$ t:; ~
;> w 52 ~ Z
I::::: VJ [- ~ ~
CIl t; fu :s s ~
i c=: t:::; ~ u
;- w 0 on Z U <
;:::~w3<~__:;t
2: ~ N 6 ~
~
~ ~
?;
:;: " N ;;. '" Co 0
"i- Co =' , . , "b ~
::; P. co ~ N:::: :-.
~ - - Co
~@ffi G@S
z ;3: ~ a: ~ ttJ
~~~ ~~2
x: ~ ;;;: ~ ~ z
~ -< -<( < -< -<
o f- r- f- t: ::s
i- ::; Z Z z ~
:< .0:: < .0:: ~
U .." <I'l ;/l V) '""
~~~ ~~~
8 ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ ~
z
-<
:;,
"
~
f-
<
"
D
'-.~ z
~ <
~ :E
"
~ 1=
-<
"
~
'1'"
./~.. l-
,r ~. X t \
~g l i.
F .~~ i
X~Ul~ 'iz
oi::;~UJ ;0
:N;~3 fi
,,",.1-<[''''
>i.J1:C ,);<
::2~ ;:::113=[ ~
>t ~lzr1 ~
"',H- -
~::J.&-; ~
qf~P e
ooq::-
f
Ii
~!
3 ~
ti
'" '"
" z
g "
t.I"J U
~
!;. -<
f E:J
Ei l:!
Q 0
<
1= ~ f:U
[;i ~ ~
~ ~ ~
Q 2
z \J.l '<T
-< ~ ><
:::E ::J ~
" " "
w ~ u.l
" ". "
tl.l Ul Ul
:Il..., U)
~ ~ ~
~ ;: ~
z z :z
-< -< -<
~ ~ ~
u u u
f: t k
"
rv'-" *'
Z ~ E
=2 ~ f3
.~::;;~_ :;:: m
~ ':,;;>,
i-::.J
<~1f
U ~ u...J!P
~ ~ ~.~
~ ;., q \0
\
,
-.-;:. \0 r;o-" eo <:.>. ~
.,,,, /
-~.
f-
J~
1=
e-
~
'"
f-
,.
f-
0;
z
6
e-
Ll
"
- z.
~'8
'"
u
-<
'"
!':
_ N ~ v '" \0 k eo ~ ~
~ :::: :::: ~ \0
N
N
f-
r-
- f" ,..,
,
BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK
,/
.' . II ~ Bonestroo
... Rosene
a Anderlik &
,~, Associates
Engineers & Architects
December 8, 1999
Mr. Jim March
City ofCenlerville
! 880 Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038
RE:
RiP Fairview Street
Centerville, Minnesota
File No. ei!6-99-103
Dear Mr. March:
1116516361311 OS/29/02 14:37 iSl :03/12 NO:507
'1Wf
a:1fff'ftrotJ, Rn~t'fl~, Amiwlllk MQ A~..I"("I""<!,.:L In~. "om Allinf!,'ltlv~ ArtlOn/~qu."/J CfJpr:srnmlty fim[:'lfJyoN
{'rtn~lpil'S:Ortf.llJ. 801"lt"\lr\'\.,. \'.I:.. ,}Q.s&ph ('. "nd~llilr, ~E. . M.lIvmL Sarv.l1a /";(..
Glenn ~. CI;U,II'. ~C. . 110DClfr Cl S(tjU11l~tll, P.E . J.fty A. BOUf~n, pe. .
/loberl W. Itclscrl&', p~. 1ll(lklrd Ii. rur~/II, Pl; .mci W5lW\ M. EbwliM, C.l'!A., ~cnJor C\;ln~UlI.anI~
AJJ"a('rilt.. Ptinrip;ns: liaw,lr(l ~. S.mf;m1. "'.e'. I Xi:iln Ii. :JQrd~n. P:r. I I?QlJafllt Pf(!trad~. P.E R
mc/'1nrd w. }:'(Ult'r, ?oli. . OIlYld O. Luu.oU~1 P.E. . !hll;l~rt C, RUU(!',l(, A.I..... . .\talk A. HaruCrt 'P.E .
Mj~1tC'j 1: R,uJtm,lnrJ. p..c. . Tee K.PJttj;j, Itt. . Kenl"lt:fil p. hlcJr:nDn.,".E. . ~rl( ll. Rolfs. I':~.; . .
Shm'l')l ~ WlIll.1tTl!on. ~!.. L,S. . Il'.o~f;' l(QUttljlf/ . ...gNlf M R'ln9' ,l,lIm R!o. .s"mnlm, P.E",
Oflk~ $~. /lfllll. Rot;/'lo:'Jtllr. Wlilm", ana SI. ClOUd, MN. Nlllw.il.lK.,Il'. WI
Web.li;.t',' WW'N.tlMt~~ttOI3,c.e.rn
~
",,,
C'l
Enclosecl, please find a pay request and. a CO$t break down for the Fairview Street Proje<:t Pleaae
refer to a letter dated September 21, J 999 from Tom Peterson, which recommends a City cost
participation of$66,165 for the t:nmk utilities on Fairview Street. The utility construction is
complete in the amOUnt of_ .66, refer to pay request number aile. The city participation
of constructed utilities,' $67,49 . . outlined in the attachment. The change in Cl;timated 'IS.
constrl.lcted cost is atmb\l '0 the change of the alignment ofthe sanitary sewer and water
main. This is the final request for the utility construction on Fairview Street. There is a So/.,
retainage illat will be held until the punch list items are completed.
The developers are reSponsible for the remain:h1g cost oithe stOrm sewer and street construction.
Contact me at (651) 604-4808 if you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
BONESTROO, ROSENE,ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES
J~
Daniel S. Sc Juender
cc: Enclosure'
2335 West Highway 36 . St. Paul. MN 5Slf3. 651-636-4600 . Fa,,: 651-636-1311
.11. Bonestroo
~ Rosene
--
n AnderJik &
'\j 1 Associates
snglneers & ArchItects
ici'lI;rb'O~ "~MfI..4" II~ iH'fa ~~~..n..,,,. Inc. '~.II> .'Ifl","",tI",.. "'(1'"",,"~ OppQnvnrr)' tmpioy(i'f
P/~IJJ.tI;1' ClIe Q. 8Qrte' tf(llJ. P.F . Jc\t.~ { Aflrl~lIll. 1'1: . .Id;'(IIIf! l W\loll.:.. J:lE. .
OIC:nI1lt. 'Qq/i, ~. I ~ r! G. Sl:h\lnfCnt. P.t, , ~rry ^ eourQon. '.f .
Roco:tt \fl. "(l~. PoL. I'l.ird f, l'...rrm:r ~5 "nd '14"" 11ft fb~flln. C "fI.., kr>"Jr (,tlflJulri1ll1U
AJJiKmr. PrlPcipJ)i; H ill'ti ^, ~Nl1;}n.1 i'.~ . J:l!'lth '" GOldOI', fl.E. . Rtl~erllt P1~ltl!lrtfl, P.E. .
~I(h.(l W. ~oitll'r. P.l::. ~ <1111(10 LOIIlCltil,l'.f.. ROtt<trl C RL.UN. A.i...... r .\.I,vt..... ~er" 1':E..
-U1(J'\.!Iel T. .il'OlUfm;vm P.. . 1l!tt j(fieh:!. P.E. . ~fV1~'l'I P. Andclklrl. ~s: I !A3w1r.1! -'elf!. '-E. .
SIQI1!!jfI'. Wllllamsofl,l'J::.' U. .!ilOC'f:ftF, Ii.ollrl'liin. A~n1'1 M ~il'!!J' AII,1" KlctS!l1mita. RE.
Olfln's,' :Sf. '1\.11. ltQche , \(flllmilr mc:J ~c. ClotllJ', W( , Mllwil!JlcH, VII
~D.ml<'. WWWbOMJtfCl .,om
,
May S, 1999
I
Mr. Jim March I
City of CenrerviHe
1 ggO Main Street
Cenlerville, MN 55038 f
Re: Center Villa I'
Our File No. 616-98-810
Dear Jim: ..
1 received Piowe Engineering's 'Engineers EStimaJ f(jr this development, daled October 12,
1998. His total amount of $2/2.518.50 diffen;substirntJally from my Octoher 27.1998 total of
$345,520.00. r would recommend using the followirg n\lmber~ for determining a I,eller oi credit.
Mr. Flowe's e.stima!e was very similar to mine for sinitary .ewer and storm sewer, His water
main was lower because he did not include 10" maif from :arian Drive to 20.h Avenue. The City
will need to pick up the COSt for oversi'zing iUld e)(le;ding east of the plat. The street
improvement numbers differed the most because hefid not include geolexttle fabric. select
granu]ll.!' borrow (:lUbgrade), concrete walk, and draiptlle.
for purposes of delilnnining a letter of credit 2mOyJ, the folla'\ling numbers should be u8ed:
I
Sanitary Sewer $41.020 I
Waier Main 43,260 j
Slann Sewer 35,100 j
Streets 168,620 1l
TOlal ~. $290,000 x 1.25.. $,.'" ,!OO.OO T 7.5; ifl>O.
Lebrl~<- . 6
The City's c.ast for extenQthll and oversizing the wa!er rnai IS $25,800. lease call me at (651)
604-4868 wlth questIons. ;
j
l
i
I
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDBRLIK & ASSOC~TES
! '
1
~
C;AJT~ACl <,:",~,h
- J ::J!,
en,)
"1/tG/9Cl
, , I
Yours very truly,
I~WP~
4
1
,1
"
1
,
!
I .
55113.\" 65hB6'4600 " Fax: 6.51-636-1311
Thomas Peterson
TWPftmr
2335 West Highway 36 . St. Paul, MN
r
Q/11/00 reV151U'nS
1. T~er s"n;tar~wer a.nd watermain along Centerville Road are a City cost.
<f. ..I~~<l[]ltary Sewey- addltlonal costs for larger diameter ~ .~.
and dee er i e (~21.0~)
. _Trunk Water Main~)ldditional costs for larger diameter G ~.
pipe and llttmgs 11.597.~'-:
TOTAL TRUNK COSTS $31,118.92
2. Revised Construction Costs using low bidder - Northdale Construction
a. Sanitary Sewer - Centerville Road
b. Water Main - CenterviIle Road
c. Services - Centerville Road
TOT AL CENTERVlLLE RD. CONSTRUCTION
$ 53,078.74
44,347.70
14.794.72
$112,221.16
3. Lateral benefit to properties along Centerville Road is equal to:
The construction cost (plus 30% indirect costs) minus developers portion minus trunk costs.
a. Sanitary Sewer: $53,078.74 x 1.30 = $69,002.36
$69,002.36 x 0.50 (developer pays Yz) = $34,501.18
$34,501.18 - $9,521.02 (trunk sewer) = $2;1,,980.16 (assessed to property owners)
b. Water Main: $44,347.70 x 1.30 = $57,652.01
$57,652.01 x 0.50 (developer pays Y2) ~ $28,826.00
$28,826.00 - $21,597.90 (trunk water) = $7,228.10 (assessed to property owners)
10 65"&,37 14j/(;,Z3 (~/llq.~'1) .
c. Services: ~ x 1.30 = $19,233.14 (assessed to property owners)
Services ar( 100% paid by property owners .
141'71+n - :;;#0,'1-1 (WiJ'~K-~)-'l-11,(rL_( &rdf-)
c. ' L "-,) -,-
I
.I -:-I........~<.A-+,!,+I?')
::: I II S 'j z..
/ I '
2-, E. x , seW' 1 p"i, u
FROM : CENT
PHONE NO. 651 429 8629
Jul. 01 2002 01:39PM P2
,
--___._ City of Centerville .
Reconciliation of Capital Pr~ects Furids'---'-
.. June 30, 20()2 .~ ~, ,)~ -fJ
1-' W..-kr
Cash Private OVer';t",I""
Fees Improvements Total ~
Buechler Estates 1,1o{S5 500.00 1,801.35 -
Center'Villa 26,218.12 3,150.00 29,368.12 '2.~800
Clearwater Meadows 2,339.90 2,400.00 4,739.90 ---
. ,
Deer Pass 11,953.62 ~,O25.00 14,918.62 -
..
Eagle Pass I "' 35,784.85 6,250.00 42,034.85 ~,. ](JI,) f-
Eagle Pass II 20,900.00 .. 20,000.00
-
Hunters Crossing 3,900.00 11,950.00 15,850.00 31,11'1
Lakeland Hills 47,1.86.00 3,818.00 51,004.00 z
- ..
Parkview 4,400.00 4,550.00 8,950.00 0
'.
Pheasant Marsh PrAxl ~ 2. 5,500.00 5,500.00 11,3t~
Royal Oaks Industrial Park ,. 33,538. 7~ 3,206:00 .. ..
36,738.76 -
"
The Shores 43,113.00 43,113.00 -
--,
Willow Glen 459.06 459.06 ~-
Woods of Clearwater Cr-l!ek 10,522.85 3,325.00 ".., 13,847.85
-
'"
245,558.45 42,627.06 288,185.51
----.--;;.\
'" I - ,-.....~~ _
--'"'" ~I ____
1 / "'-- /
~. 'f'V.> 5/~<q(}
4l3ipli?
() "
De(V (/1>>, ~" _;-le~
~
II !J j L
-- Jvi,,~ wQ) SQ.C e;J1z,r;.-!w<'Y ::;~
1",/ s ~ODD lreVIJR),)
~i"-'1 ?'^f -/-;, i.e. ~+ o,W"J,
c >,~
..:;.Jf'0r~' 1
~ >' /^~ ,.-a", <</'.0 , i1 0 C v-fJ,'f .
(r I ...
II) .J....i:e,,r"'....,,. A
l.--" v-v "". ,. ~. "" ' ~.~ .
'I ..L
I'L '5"1!
I.-
/; +-h "jS
72--'20 '-< C '2--3 .at) - 'L'?,ov) :0- 0
S- Y- (I'?-OO- 5"&"-) ~ t/?G7S-
.. "7""'- I/(' 1-
-F.. 1 1 ~ '31 OD" /.' -;;. 7000' e<0\'1Iv'- IP c:-x'I,M
/OOOo-YO/' "/2.--./ (; ..
.' (/,c if r '(r~2c- e
5" I olJ p- C1', ';""/.P---ife"C\O '" 0, \';" -c.- '-15 F::' .. \.
4-5;(((1')-100) ~ it/Z-b ~TA--L 0lJuxl. -=--(11'3'-1;'1:
v,,Jrf
" /"
{'l IS 'J
(l,.I'v rOc:: .ifN,,,,+-.
(r- '.~' ..
vdvet; :
1- /700' -> OJ r.J ,
3/1 0 'f,+" I ><(r 3,00-10,00) ~;f- 2A: 8'00,
I tf
o'l/?~4c.o ",-45'5" ><4 ~ t82-0 Tl>7>+-L ~!'7oo
ECijLt P44> I
7/1/02
1\ /)~ 1"f/ ..L
j..'lJ.fv-.( I'---ii. /.v "/,,,t.e.-\ ,
12:08 PM
capital prCljects reconciliation.xls
#
tervi{{e
'E5ta6{isfm{ 1857
1880 Main Street . CentervifCe,:Jvf2i 55038
(651) 429-3232 .:Fa?\.. (651) 429-8629
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
RESOLUTION #02 - 039
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TRANSFERRING OF ENTERPRISE FUNDS
(W ATERlSEWER FUNDS TO GENERAL FUNDS)
WHEREAS, pursuant to Council receiving documentation from the Finance Director and
reviewing same; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Council's consideration and the above stated information; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA:
1. Hereby authorizes the Finance Director to transfer funds per attached
Exhibit A
Attachment: September 11, 2002 Memo from Finance Director and associated
documentation.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council this 11th day of September, 2002.
Attest
Mayor
City Clerk
,
.
tervi[[e
'Estal3[isfte<f 189
FUND TRANSFERS
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL
Date: September 11, 2002
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Ms. Kim Moore-Sykes, City Administrator
From: Ellen Paulseth, Finance Director
Re: Administration of Enterprise Funds
Last year, council budgeted $31,840 in the General Fund for the administration of
enterprise funds for the year 2002. The realization of this revenue can be accomplished
with the following transfer:
From Fund:
To Fund:
Water
$15,920
General
$15,920
Sewer
$15,920
General
$15,920
.
:;;
<( "
N 0>
'" rn
O,:io...
N
o
a;
~
o
W M
0
..J 0 N
..J N 0
0
:> l- N
I-
a:: W III
W C) ::>
Cl
l- e ~
z ::>
w ell .c;
() 0
W t:
~
LL ::> D-
o Z c
~
>- w ~
3
!:: > ()
w
() a::
>
'" e
z'"
~~
~'C"
. 0
~
'"
'i3
.E
"'"
~o
<nO
0'"
0.
o
~
D-
"'-
o E
l'l<
o
>:
m
'0
l-
e
o
N
~ -
o ~
00>
N"
"
m
~
o
Cl):;:
,,0.
c: "j:
" 0
> ~
~ "
"''''
()
"
'"
o
Z
::J
U.
~*~****~**~#*~**#****~****#****~
g88~g~gg~g~g8gggggg~gg~8gg8g8g8g
dO~Norooo~omooodoodoIDoo~dd6~6ocicio
~N~ ~~~ ~ ~N ~g~ ~g
N
8ggggg8ggggggg8S8ggggggggggggggg
ModoOOOOOOOMMOooodcido6dddo6ddood
NOOOOOOOOO~M~~OOO~OO~~OODOOO~WW~
~~~~~~~q~~~~~ ~q~~~q ~q~~~~
~$~~~g~~~~$~~ ro~ ~~ g~~~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~
. .,
;;;;
~~g~g~ggg~8~ggg8gg~gggg~~g~~gggg
0~~~~~oNdo~0~dood0~o6oo~~o~6do6d
~ro~rn~~o~~roN~~~~~v~MWW~~~~O~~~WW~
~m~oo~~owmN~~ ~~~ ~v~~~
ciM~~~~N~ ~~~~ ~. N~~~W
~w~~~~~w ~~~w ~ ~~~~
.. ..
000000000000000000000 do 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0
0000 Cl CI 0 0 0 0 a 0 Cl 0000000000000000000 0
~dddood6dd6d6dodoDo6oDdoD6d6do6d ~
NOOOOOOOOOOMWWWWO~oo~ ~OOWO~~W~"
IDmo~vooo~o~ ~ 00 ro~o ow ~
ci~roM~~~~~~m w ~~ ~~o ~ ~
~ W~W~W~~NW N~ ~ v w ~
"<;j- .- w- $&'1- Efl ~.
~ ~ ~
(()!DO("')O,....O~01'-OOOOOOOOOOlOOOo,)~ON(j.loO!Dro Q)
ONO~OMONO~~OOOooOo~~oao~~o~mDO~~ (()
~~~o0~o~d0mooroMooom06oON~d~~odd~ ~
OlvvNroN~Mo~roEflroNmwrom(()~~~$(()roo~~wmm~ ~
N"<tC'1"<tN'<:t m""-N~ NOC") I'-- N(o ~""'ON<t.I ............0 m
Lfi~-Nl!iEflcri 0)-.;-....;(;.9. I.('io~ci ~ N~Q). "<;j-"cio~"(0'7 Wcriro-,...."
Nf:I7~~ I"- W*N N......c::J. rry...... '-NNf:17 0<0 ~
2 (/;) ~ W I.A-;;;W U7Efl WE/7f:17 ;)."'7 ~
000000000000000000000000000000000 00
0000000001"-0000000000000000000000 ~
ggggggggg~gg,g~gggggggg~ggggggggg ;n
o~("')o~(() OO.-V NO (()......~o ~OID 0 C":l
O~ON~N ~~~m ~o f:l7Efl~~ ~~ro ~ ~
......w-......w- 0 ~~Nf:17 ('.1.- ~...... Nf:I7~ ~ m
2 ~ w w- Efl~ Eflf:17 w- w- ~
0} c: ctl_ .&
'2 ~tn ~~;(/) c2 ~ ~-g
(/)~ =m ~O~m ~c ~ ~5
~~~ ~ *~~ ~~ ~;3@ f.~~~ O>~
~c~ ~ c ~~~_ ~ti cc ~ ~~5~. s~
~~~(/)(/)~ ~ IDUC~ ~~(/)~ ~~&ma~~~~ ~s
~~~Em. ~ ~gcEw~~rn~~~~(/)wC:~~cE~~ID to
$t9L..L..U)..c: Q.{J)CI)rnro ()'-' W""L..<{UlW Ul_ Eon:: O-E
g~owcu(/)(/)W(1JcUlE ~U)~~o~i~L..gEffi'~OID 0
~~fr~~~$=~~2C~~_~~C:~~~~C$(1JOC~x~ruug
_ ~c~~~rox~S~oID~~EQ~~~~w@w_~rom~c~
E~~--~aQoc(1J~~~~_(/)~(1Jw~ro =~~~~~ID~~
0Bg~ro~C~mc~m-IDOCO=~U)B~uSW00C~~~~~
c:~c:E~=.20=$w~~EID~W~ID=ro~E~~w2~=~~c
0aw~c~o~roc~~oo~ro~ID~ona -~~m(1Jow-~
0woc~~roNW~<~~~I~m~oc~~~~ ~E~oc~wz~~
OOOOOOO~~OOOO"""N~~~OO~OOOOOOOOOOOM D
ZOOO~O~~N~~OOOOoOO~OO"""NMo~~~~mooo Z
~oa~~NN~N~N~~~~~~~~O~~............NNNNNN~NN ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~g~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
~ i
~~~~~~U~D~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~uuu~~~~~~ ~
wee c: c c: c c c c c c c c C c c c c c C c c c c c c c: c c c c C W
Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z
UJ u.. l..I.. LL LL u.. u.. LL LL lL u.. u.. ~ I.L I.L LL U. tL ~ ~ u.. u.. ~ LL IL U. ~ ~ u.. LL U. LL ~ W
o g ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ffi m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ili ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi ~ g ~ ~ ~ m ~ m ~ ~ 0
~00GOG~O~~~000~~0G~00G~0000000000 0
Cl
~~~......~~~~~~~~~......~~.-......~~......~............~~~~~~~-~
~oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
u..............~......~~~......~~~~~~~~............~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
'"
r-
'"
.0
~~~~
0000
0000
0006
o
o
gj
"
",
'"
"!
;;;;
0000
0000
66ci6
~/flth~
N
r-
oo
o
...
<6
'"
'"
'"
0000
0000
dooo
4f'il-~EA-~
0000
0000
ci6co
V7WU3- w
OOO(Y)
000",,"
odd""":
W U7O!A t""J
..
0000
000.0
6006
EI)- ViI- ~ If.l-
o
z
::>
u.
C'
"
o ~
u"
w W ~
~g~
E E W (il
1:1) (1)0:: 01
(I) IF) III .~
Q) l1) ~ c
Ul U) 0 >-
U) (I) ~ (1J
<:I:;<CcUl
__ctl.....
w ~ -3 ~ ~
f2~~.![!2
>CI)())zE
cr:
UJ
(/)0000
in~~2N
w -~ ~ ~ ~
Cl
I-
(!J~f--I-I-
CiJf/)U)Cf)U)
S; g:-g: ?2 g:
......Q:lCf.l0)0l
N"-~""""""
o
'"
o
~(\JNNN
-'0000
u..(T1("'";lC".l(Y)
.)
UJ
....
t:
Q)
E~
Q)~
en to'
L. ~
::::J'o
.c~
en ~
__ C/)
c~
-
~:
Ql
UJ"E
....Ql
e.g-
-- C/)
Q)
o
Q)
~
~~~---- -~ -
000 0 0 0 0
000 0 0 0
000 0 0 0
000 0 0 0
o l.(') 0 L{) 0 L()
('f)NN~~
Amount
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Cash Receipts
September 1 through September 6, 2002
Tran
Date Refer Comments
Batch
Name
J.
09/06/021:12 PM
Page 1
Account Oeser
FUND 101 GENERAL FUND
Act Type G
$200.00
$0.50
$64.00
$0.50
$5.29
$0.50
$0.50
$200.00
$71.50
$0.50
$0.50
Act $543.79
Act Typs R
Act
$25.00
$25.00
$12.00
$25.00
55,000.00
$2.373.44
$8.00
$90.00
$100,00
$2.00
$2.546.69
$349.00
$25.00
5250.00
$110.00
$10,941.13
FUND 10
$11,484.92
9/4/2002
9/412002
9/4/2002
914/2002
9/4/2002
9/6/2002
9/6/2002
9/6/2002
9/6/2002
9/6/2002
9/6/2002
9/4/2002
9/4/2002
9/4/2002
9/412002
9/4/2002
91412002
9/6/2002
9/6/2002
91612002
9/6/2002
9/6/2002
9/6/2002
9/8/2002
9/6/2002
916/2002
06979 PORTAGE WAY#D2-1 9-4-02
o 2030 MAIN STREET -C02-o 94-02
o 6979PORTAGEWAY#02~1 9-4~02
o 6825 CENTERVILLE RD #CO 94-02
o US UR Receipt Group 00 FIN 9-4-02UT
o 6977 PORTAGE WAY - MOZ- 9-6-02
o 6814 GROUSE HOLLOW - P 9-6-02
06985 PORTAGE WAY - 02-1 9-6-02-1
06985 PORTAGE WAY - 02-1 9-6-02-1
o 6814 GROUSE HOLLOW - C 9-6-02-'1
02005 GATEWAY CIRLE #CO 9-6-02
06979 PORTAGE WAY #D2-1 9-4-02
o 6825 CENTERVILLE RD #CO 9-4-02
o 1689 PELTIER LAKE DR - 0 9-4-02
o 2030 MAIN STREET - C02-0 9-4-02
2 Plat fees 09-03-02R
06979 PORTAGE WAY #02-1 9-4-02
o C. LIEN - DOG TAG # 175 9-6-02
o 6814 GROUSE HOLLOW - P 9-6-02
o 6977 PORTAGE WAY - M02- 9-6-02
OJ. PAAR - AFFIDAVIT OF CA 9-6-02
06985 PORTAGE WAY - 02-1 9-6-02-1
02005 GATEWAY CIRCLE # 9-6-02
o 6985 PORTAGE WAY-02-1 9-6-02-1
o REZONtNG APPLICATION - 9-6-02-1
Q 6814 GROUSE HOLLOW - C 9-6-02-1
FUND 415 STORM WATER IMP PROJECTS
Act Type R
Act
$1.85
$20.13
$200.00
$14.24
$1.46
$200.00
$437.68
FUND 41
$437.68
9/4/2002
9/4/2002
914/2002
9)6i2002
9/6/2002
9i6/2002
FUND 420 EAGLE PASS IMP PROJECT
Act Type R
$33,624.71 9/412002
Act
$33,624.71
FUND 42
$33,624.71
FUND 441 EAGLE PASS 2ND ADON
o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 DR 9.-4-02UT
o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F 94-Q2UT
Q 6979 PORTAGE WAY #02-1 9-4-02
o US Receipt Serv '10 DRAIN F 9-6~02lJT
o US Receipt Serv Pen Ai 0 DR 9-6-02UT
06985 PORTAGE VtJ/1,Y - 02~1 9-6-02-1
1 Eagle Pass I Escrow
09-03-02R
G 101-24504 Site Main. Escrow
G 101-24503 Elec. Permit Surcharge
G 101-24500 B!dg. Permit Surcharge
G 101-24503 Elec. Permit Surcharge
G 101-11500 Accounts Receivable
G 101-24502 Mech, Permit SurCharge
G 101-24501 Plmbing Permit Surcharg
G lOi -24504 Site Main, Escrow
G 101-24500 Bldg_ Permit Surcharge
G 101-24503 Elee. Permit Surcharge
G 101-24503 Elec. Permit Surcharge
R 101-32300 Site Maintenance Fees
R 101 ~32225 Electrical Inspection
R 101-32225 Electricallnspection
R 101-32225 Electrical Inspection
R 101-32215 Zoning Fees
R 101-32210 Building/Mach. Permits
R 101-32200 Animal licenses
R 101-32180 Plumbing Permits
R 101-32210 BuildingiMech. Permits
R 101-36200 Miscellaneous Revenues
R 101-32210 Building/Mech, Permits
R 101-32225 Electrical Inspection
R 101-32300 SHe Maintenance Fees
R 101-322i5 Zoning Fees
R 101-32225 Electrical Inspection
R 4'15-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu
R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu
R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu
R415~32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu
R4i5-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu
R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu
R 420~36235 Escrow Deposits
Amount
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Cash Receipts
09106/021:12 PM
Page 2
September 1 through September 6, 2002
Tran
Date Refer Comments
Batch
Name
Account Oeser
R 441-36235 Escrow Deposits
Act Type R
$20,000,QO
Act $20,000,00
FUND 44
$20,000,00
FUND 601 WATER FUND
ActType R
Act
$1.22
$21,75
51,500.00
$290,00
$17,20
$218,04
$22,10
$1,500,00
$290,00
$0.47
$145.27
$4,74
$14,53
$4,025,32
FUND 60
$4,025,32
FUND 602 SEWER FUND
Act Type G
$1,200,00
$1,200,00
Act $2,400,00
Act Type R
$328,83
$2,000,00
$30,31
$24,56
$235,34
$2,000,00
Act $4,619,04
FUND 60
$7,019,04
FUND 621 PARK & REC, FUND
Act Type R
Act
$37,08
$37,08
FU ND 62
$37.08
9/4/2002 2 Escrow
9/4/2002
9/4/2002
9/4/2002
9/4/2002
9/412002
9/4/2002
9/4/2002
9/612002
9/6/2002
9i6f2Q02
9;6/2002
9/6/2002
91612002
9/4/2002
9/6/2002
9/412002
9/4/2002
9/4/2002
9/6/2002
9/6/2002
9/6/2002
9/6/2002
801 ESCROW FUND
Act Type R
$, ,500.00 91412002
Act $1,500.00
l_ __
(l US Receipt Serv Pen 30 \/VA
o U B Receipt Serv Pen 1 W A T
o 6979 PORTAGE WAY #02-1
06979 PORTAGE WAY #02-1
o UB Receipt Serv 30 WATER
o UB Receipt Serv 1 WATER
o UB Receipt Sec/15 WATER
06985 PORTAGE WAY - 02-1
o 6985 PORTAGE WAY - 02-1
o UB Receipt Serv Pen 30 W A
o UB Receipt Serv 1 WATER
o US Receipt $erv 30 WATER
o UB Receipt Serv Pen '\ WAT
09-ll3-02R
9-4-02UT
9-4-02UT
9-4-02
9-4-02
9-4-02UT
9-4-02UT
9+02UT
9-6-02-1
9-6-02~ 1
9-6-02UT
9-B-02UT
9-6-02UT
9-6-02UT
o 6979 PORTAGE WAY #02-1 9-4-02
06985 PORTAGE WAY - 02-1 9-5-02-1
o UB Receipt Serv 6 SEWER
06979 PORTAGE WAY #02-1
l) US Receipt Sent Per; 6 SEW
o UB Receipt Serv Pen 6 SEW
o UB Receipt Serv 6 SEWER
06985 PORTAGE WAY - 02-1
9-4-02UT
9-4-02
9-4-02UT
9-6-02UT
9-6-02UT
9-6-02-1
020% DONATION TO PARKS 9-6.02
o 6857 BEAVER POND WAY - 9-4-02
R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee
R 601-37100 Water Sales
R 601-37150 Water ConnectlReconnec
R 601-34600 Water Meter Charges
R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee
R 601-37100 Water Sales
R 601-37100 Water Sales
R 601-37150 Water ConnectiReconnec
R 601-34600 Water Meter Charges
R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee
R 601-37100 Water Sales
R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee
R 601-37100 Water Sales
G 602-34407 Service Availabmty Charg
G 602-34407 Service Availability Charg
R 602~37200 Sewer Sales
R 602-37250 Sewer ConnectfReconnec
R b02~37200 Sewer Safes
R 602-37200 Sewer Sales
R 602~37200 Sewer Sales
R 602-37250 Sewer ConnectJReconnec
R 621-36230 Contributions and Donatio
R 80: ~36235 Escrow Deposits
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
09106102 1: 12 PM
Page 3
Cash Receipts
September 1 through September 6, 2002
Amount
Tran
Date Refer Comments
Batch
Name
Account Oeser
FUND 80
$1,500.00
$78,128.75
FILTER: ([Period] in(9) and [Act Year] = '2002') and [Tran Nbr] in(1 0, 13)
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
09/06/02 11;42 AM
Page 1
*Check Summary Register@
Name
SEPTEM6ER 2002
Check Date
Check..Amt
10100 MAIN STREET BANK
Paid Chk# 017283 A-1 HYDRAULIC SALES & SERVICE
Paid Chk# 017284 ABDO, ABDO, EICK
Paid Chk# 017285 ARNT CONSTRUCTION
Paid Chk# 0172B6 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLlK
Paid Chk# 017287 BUILDING CODES & STANDARDS DIV
Paid Chk# 017288 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT
Paid Chk# 017289 CLEARWATER CREEK
Paid Chk# 017290 EPA AUDIO VISUAL
Paid Chk# 017291 EXCEL TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC
Paid Chk# 017292 GOTWALD, PAM
Paid Chk# 017293 GRANGERS BUMPER TO BUMPER
Paid Chk# 017294 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT
Paid Chk# 017295 HUGO FEED MILL
Paid Chk# 017296 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS
Paid Chk# 017297 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH INC
Paid Chk# 017298 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERA TI
Paid Chk# 017299 MC PHERSEN, JOEL
Paid Chk# 017300 MEADOWVIEW HOMES
Paid Chk# 017301 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIROMEN
Paid Chk# 017302 MOORE-SYKES, KIM
Paid Chk# 017303 NORLAND. KRISTIN
Paid Chk# 017304 NORTHERN FOREST PRODUCTS
Paid Chk# 017305 OFFICE MAX
'aid Chk# 017306 ON SITE SANITATION
Paid Chk# 017307 PALZER, PAUL
Paid Chk# 017308 PEIL, KATHY
Paid Chk# 017309 PRESS PUBLICATIONS
Paid Chk# 017310 REHBEINS BLACK DIRT
Paid Chk# 017311 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS
Paid Chk# 017312 SWEENEY, KRIS
Paid Chk# 017313 TIME SAVER
Paid Chk# 017314 VALLEY CREEK LAWN & LANDSCAPE
Paid Chk# 017315 VERIZON WIRELESS, BELLEVUE
FILTER: None
9/11/2002
911112002
9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9111/2002
.9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9111/2002
9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9/1112002
9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9/1112002
9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9/11/2002
9/1112002
9/11/2002
Total Checks
$107.48
$1,712.33
$103,025.60
$16,538,77
$140.00
$35,510.56
$57.44
$2,309.61
$15.72
$850.00
$14.10
$874.79
$42.20
$28.70
$30.80
$60.00
$1,994.85
$1,500.00
$17,820.00
$137.75
$5.29
$13,381.00
$447.52
$902.60
$150.40
$20.00
$410.75
$22.37
$264,06
$43.71
$283.13
$4,097.59
$300.02
~~--
$203,099,14
Centennial Fire District
Check Register
9/3/2002
The disbursements listed below are submitted by the Centennial Fire District for your approval:
DATE
9/3/2002
9/3/2002
9/3/2002
9/3/2002
9/3/2002
9/3/2002
9/3/2002
9/3/2002
9/3/2002
9/3/2002
9/3/2002
9/3/2002
9/3/2002
9/3/2002
9/3/2002
9/3/2002
9/3/2002
9/3/2002
9/3/2002
9/3/2002
CHECK# NAME
13378
13379
13380
13381
13382
13383
13384
13385
13386
13387
13388
13389
13390
13391
13392
13393
13394
13395
13396
13397
Anoka-Hennepin Technical College
Cameron Haapoja
Centennial Utilities
Emergency Apparatus Maintenance
Fire Marshals Assn. of Minnesota
Metrocall
Milo Bennett
Northland Fire & Security
Oxygen Service Company
Randy D. Lauderbaugh
Sedgwick
Verizon Wireless
Verizon Wireless
Viking Office Products
Arthur Mohler
Lino Lakes Park & Recreation Dept.
David Bruder
Stock Building Supply
Sweeney Construction & Design Company
.....V01D***
10f1
ACCOUNT
42220 - Travel, Conference, Schooi
42280 - Miscellaneous Expense
42251 - Station 1 - Gas
42000 - Vehicle Maintenance
42200 - Dues and Memberships
42240 - Telephone Expense
42180 - Office Supplies
42130 - Equipment Expense
42270 - Breathing Air
42220 - Travel, Conference, School
42110 - Other Maintenance
45500 - FF Cell Phone Expense
42240 - Telephone Expense
42180 - Office Supplies
45010 - Safety Camp Expense
45010 - Safety Camp Expense
45510 - Garage Expense
4551 0 - Garage Expense
45510 - Garage Expense
00000 - VOID
Total
AMOUNT
150.00
39.00
68.45
1,441.73
35.00
73.47
12.77
60.00
137.30
504.87
242.00
118.91
51.92
99.48
22.24
1,243.55
104.16
3,948.45
2,139.04
0.00
$10,492.34
.
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
August 28, 2002
6:30 p.m.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled
meeting on August 28, 2002, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street.
PRESENT:
Mayor Tim SWedberg@J":'
Council Member Dick Traviso/j'16\"O:i
CounCIl Member Man Nelson:, \.S7'
Council Member Linda Brous sa rdU' kertfJ ^ ~.o ~,,:O [f@,
CouncIl Member Capra [Rj @ lJ"
~- 0 '
None.
ABSENT:
STAFF:
City Administrator, Ms. Moore-Sykes
City Engineer, Mr. Tom Peterson
City Attorney, Mr. Jim Hoeft
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Swedberg called the August 28, 2002, City Council meeting to order at 6:32 p.m.
II. SET AGENDA
Council Member Capra requested that a discussion concerning the eminent domain at the
Carpenter property be added as Number 4 under Council Business.
Council Member Capra requested that a discussion concerning building permit fees be
added as Number 5 under Council Business.
Council Member Capra requested an update on the Dolner property water issue during
announcements.
Council Member Nelson requested an update on the capital projects and proposed right of
way ordinance as well as both of the water complaints.
Motion bv Council Member Nelson, seconded bv Conncil Member Capra to
approve the al!:enda as amended. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
III. A W ARDS/PRESENTATIONS/APPEARANCES
1. Mr. Doug Fischer. P.E., Anoka County Engineer - County Road 14
City of Centerville
August 28, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Mayor Swedberg indicated the County has plans in the works to widen County Road 14
and asked Mr. Fischer to provide an update.
Mr. Fischer addressed Council and gave an overview of the proposal for the changes to
County Road 14.
Mr. Fischer indicated the project involves Main Street from the overpass at 35W to the
interchange at 35E and said the project would most likely not begin until 2006. He also
indicated the County had received grant funds for the project and those funds are
available until 2008.
Mr. Fischer provided a proposed drawing of the construction of Main Street and
discussed the different standards for a state aid highway and how that would affect the
different areas of County Road 14. He then explained that in order to comply with state
aid standards the road has to be a certain width from curb to curb but does not have to be
four traffic lanes.
Council Member Capra asked if the speed would be reduced or raised. Mr. Fischer
indicated that the County does not set the speed limits, MNDOT does. He then said it is
possible to request a traffic study but cautioned that the traffic study could indicate that
the traffic is traveling faster than the posted limit and MNDOT may recommend
increasing the speed limit.
Council Member Broussard Vickers commented that in this type of process eminent
domain is used to obtain adequate space for the project. She then asked if the County
would take property all on one side or equally on both sides.
Mr. Fischer indicated it would be difficult to speculate but said that in all projects there
are some property owners interested in being bought out so the County follows the path
of least resistance. He then said that in most cases property is taken on both sides of the
roadway but not in all cases.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked, from the curb, what is the closest distance a
resident structure can be located to the roadway. Mr. Fischer indicated a resident
structure can be located all the way up to the right of way line depending on the roadway.
He then said that would be very tight because they do like to have a sidewalk.
Council Member Broussard Vickers commented that the normal right of way is 15 or 20
feet from the curb.
Mr. Fischer explained that generally when that happens the damages to that property are
so high the County would offer to buy that person out. He then said it does not mean the
County will tear the house down because there is a buyer for every house and houses are
only tom down if they are in the right of way and occasionally ifthey are too close.
Page 2 of 18
City of Centerville
August 28, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Mr. Fischer indicated this would be a unique project because the road will not be the
same for the entire length.
Council Member Capra indicated it is difficult to get out onto Main Street from some of
the city streets and asked ifthere would be stop signs. Mr. Fischer indicated the necessity
of stop signs or traffic signals would be considered and evaluated. He then said that the
four way stop signs may be converted to signals.
Council Member Capra indicated there is a pedestrian concern right now.
Ms. Helmbrecht indicated there is a lot of pedestrian traffic in the 30 mile per hour
section. Mr. Fischer indicated that it is not required by the project but he would give
strong consideration to a trail or sidewalk for the area.
Mr. Kilian commented that the four way stop signs cause issues with traffic and said that
a stop sign provides a break in traffic to allow cars to get out. He then asked if the
County had considered an entrance and exit ramp at 35W to alleviate the congestion.
Mr. Fischer indicated that has been included in the County's transportation plan but the
City of Lino Lakes does not support a full access interchange at that location as they
think the main access onto 35W should be at Lake Drive.
Mr. Kilian asked if Lino Lakes could dictate whether there would be an interchange there
or if it is decided based on traffic volumes. Mr. Fischer indicated that because it is a state
aid route and an interstate highway there are municipal consent requirements and the City
could potentially stop the County. He then said that the County prefers to work with
cities and not against them.
Council Member Nelson asked whether the County would consider an interchange at 20th
Avenue. Mr. Fischer indicated that had been brought up from the Washington County
side but the problem is it is hard enough to get an existing interchange rebuilt on the
MNDOT system and to get a new one added is much farther down the priority list.
Council Member Nelson commented that it would make sense to connect 35W and 35E
via 20th Avenue.
Mr. Fischer indicated he always thought that made a lot of sense but that is a MNDOT
decision. He then said that MNDOT is currently taking comments on its 20-year
highway plan and these comments would be more appropriate in that venue. He further
explained that with the state's budget issues there are no plans to expand any of the trunk
highways in Anoka County which means that the county roads are bearing the brunt of
the capacity problems.
Council Member Broussard Vickers suggested going around Centerville to the north and
widening 20th Avenue as a way of lessening the impact and keeping acquisition costs
down.
Page 3 of 18
1_ _
City of Centerville
August 28, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Mr. Fischer indicated that on the old county map there used to be a dotted line that did
that but the 1990's were good years for environmental activists and those new laws took
out that corridor as an option due to the wetlands.
Council Member Broussard Vickers suggested the wetlands could be mitigated as it is not
a specially protected wetland. Mr. Fischer explained that when the county needs to
impact wetlands adjacent to a county road the first question they are asked is if the impact
could be avoided by changing the route and the answer would be yes in this case.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked who asks that question. Mr. Fischer indicated
the rules are provided by the Wetland Conservation Act.
Council Member Broussard Vickers commented that every development could be
avoided. Mr. Fischer commented that, from a highway perspective, when they go for
permits the way the rules are for highway projects the first question is can you overcome
the impact. He then said that safety always overrides wetland impacts but only
associated with improving existing routes and does not apply to new routes.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she feels there is a major safety issue when
you put a four lane highway through a small town and she does not feel that enough of an
effort has been made to try to mitigate the wetlands. She then said that, if you can do it to
build a house, she would think that the transportation department could come up with
enough evidence to get it approved.
Mr. Fischer indicated that whenever a project oftms magnitude is undertaken a multitude
of environment reviews are required. He then said that one of those requirements is an
alternative alignment study. He further commented that the route to the north could be
evaluated during the alternative alignment study.
Council Member Nelson asked if the County was interested in turning county roads over
to cities. Mr. Fischer indicated the comprehensive plan classifies some roads that the
county is interested in turning over to the local jurisdiction but those are classified as
minor collector roads.
Paul Montain commented that there are no shoulders on 20th A venue or Centerville Road
and asked if there is a proposal to add those to minimize the danger for pedestrians.
Mr. Fischer indicated that when roads are overlaid the County attempts to add as much as
they can but adding shoulders to Centerville Road would be difficult without a major
reconstruction due to the deep ditches.
Mr. Montain asked if there was anything in the plans for the next 10 years. Mr. Fischer
indicated the County tries to put together a solid five-year plan.
Page 4 ofl8
City of Centerville
August 28, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Council Member Broussard Vickers commented that, at one time, Centerville Road was
on a 20-year plan.
Ms. Helmbrecht commented that the City has trails tying into Centerville Road and Main
Street and doing this project without doing Centerville Road does not make any sense.
Mr. Fischer indicated that doing the project may make trails disconnected for a time but
eventually, when funding becomes available all those trails will end up connected. He
then said that there may not be enough federal funds to complete this entire project.
Ms. Helmbrecht commented that, if the County is going to do this project, it needs to
look at doing Centerville Road. She then asked if the County was aware that the City has
a design for the area from the Minnesota Design T earn.
Mr. Fischer indicated the County's policy is that the right of way required is the County's
cost. He then said that the policy on cost sharing is that they only require the City to buy
right of way for new alignments.
Mayor Swedberg asked that comments be finished up and noted there would be ample
opportunity in the future for further comments.
Council Member Capra said she is concerned with the environmental impact between the
two lakes and commented that the two cannot be intermixed. She then asked how the
County would address reconstruction and helping to prevent the polluting of Centerville
Lake from Peltier Lake.
Mr. Fischer indicated the County may have no options as it will need to follow the DNR
requirements. He then said the timber bridge just south of the dam will need to be
rebuilt.
Mr. Fischer said that the County wants to end up with a product that every body is happy
with. He then said that the County is not ready to kick off the process yet and predicted it
could be as much as a year from now when the process is begun.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked what the City's contribution would be. Mr.
Fischer indicated the County wants the City to be involved with choosing and approving
of the consultant used but said the consultant costs are generally the County's with some
City participation.
Ms. Helmbrecht asked if the money is available or whether it had been cut by MNDOT.
Mr. Fischer indicated that there is a certain amount of money allocated to the region
through the Metropolitan Council and the funds are available to the County at this time.
Mayor Swedberg thanked Mr. Fischer for coming and thanked him for his support of the
work at 35E and County Road 14. Mr. Fischer indicated the County knew that the four
way stop would add to the congestion but felt it was necessary in the name of safety.
Page 5 of 18
I _
City of Centerville
August 28, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
2. Mr. John Thill, Parade & Fireworks (Fete des Lacs)
Council Member Nelson complimented Mr. Thill on the parade.
John Thill addressed Council and gave a brief overview of the parade and fireworks. He
then briefly reviewed the accounting document he had provided to Council and suggested
that the Lions be allowed to purchase flags for the parade route with the remaining
$1,127.20.
Mayor Swedberg thanked Mr. Thill for the accounting.
Mr. Thill indicated a copy of all the receipts was given to the Mayor. Mayor Swedberg
gave the receipts to the City Administrator.
Council Member Capra indicated it was recommended a few years ago to have the stakes
made and at that time the cost estimate was approximately $300 to $400.
Motion by Council Member Capra, seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to authorize the use of UP to $1,100 for the purchase of parade route flal!s.
Council Member Capra amended her motion to up to $600.00 for the flags.
Council Member Broussard Vickers withdrew her second.
Motion by Council Member Capra, secouded bv Council Member Nelson to
authorize the use of up to $600.00 for the purchase of parade route flal!s.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she did not think they should have to come
back for approval if the bid is more and she would like to authorize up to the remaining
balance.
Council Member Travis indicated he concurred with Council Member Broussard Vickers.
Council Member Capra indicated she would like to amend her motion.
Council Member Nelson withdrew her second.
Motion by Council Member Capra, seconded by Council Member Travis to
authorize City Staff to work with Mr. Thill for the purchase of parade stakes in an
amount UP to the remaininl! balance. Ayes - 4, Nays -1(Nelson). Motion carried.
Page 6 of 18
City of Centerville
August 28, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
IV. PUBLIC HEARING(S)
1. Provosed Ordinance #13 - Possession. Sale and Consumption of Intoxicating
Liquor. Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Within the City ofCenterville.
Mayor Swedberg opened the public hearing at 6:40 p.m.
Donna King of 1724 Sorrel Street addressed Council and indicated she had an issue with
the noise being generated from Kelly's and Trio. She then said that she would prefer if
Council did not authorize any special permits that would allow outside events to go
beyond the noise ordinance time limit of 10:00 p.m. because she has to work early in the
mornings and the last event was very difficult for her.
Council Member Capra asked if residents were notified when noise permits are issued.
Ms. Moore,Sykes indicated she did not think so.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the enforcement issue can be taken up with the police
department and said there is no requirement to notif'y the neighbors when a special permit
is issued but it is possible once the City determines how large of an area should be
noticed.
Mayor Swedberg asked whether the liquor ordinance needed any information on noise.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the noise issue would be handled under the noise
ordinance and said that, if it is too difficult for officers to apply, Council could review
that ordinance.
Council Member Nelson asked Ms. Moore-Sykes to review the noise ordinance and
report back at the next Council meeting and also asked her to let Ms. King know whether
Council needs to amend the ordinance or not.
Mayor Swedberg said the comments were reasonable and should be able to be
accommodated. He then said, if residents need to abide by a 10:00 p.m. time limit, he
thinks it is appropriate for other outside activities in the City.
Council Member Travis asked what Council wanted to do about permits.
Ms. King indicated they are notified of a variance but are not notified of noise permits
when issued.
City Attorney Hoeft suggested using 300 or 500 feet for notification purposes.
Council indicated they would try to address the concerns when reviewing the noise
ordinance.
Page 7 of 18
L___ __
City of Centerville
August 28, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Council Member Nelson indicated she had some issues with the proposed liquor
ordinance and would like to discuss that later in the meeting.
Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council Member
Nelson to close the public hearinl!. AIl in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Swedberg closed the public hearing at 7:00 p.m.
V. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Pheasant Marsh Phase II Bond Sale
Mr. Eilertson indicated that Resolution #02-033 would allow the City to pay itself back
from the bond proceeds.
Motion by Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Travis to
approve Resolution 02-033 as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if City Attorney Hoeft reviewed all the
resolutions. City Attorney Hoeft indicated he had reviewed the resolutions and had no
issues with them.
Mr. Eilertson indicated that Resolution #02-034 sets the sale date for the bonds.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked whether it would be in the City's best interest
to shorten the call date to allow for faster prepayment because, in the past, developments
have been completed faster than anticipated.
Mr. Eilertson suggested shortening the call date by a year as that would not adversely
affect the City's borrowing rate.
Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded bv Mavor Swedberl! to
approve Resolution #02-034 with the call date chanl!ed to February 1. 2007. All in
favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Eilertson indicated Resolution #02-035 recognIzes that Council received the
application from the developer.
Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded by Council Member
Carra to approve Resolution #02-035 with the date chanl!ed from the 26th to the
2St . All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded by Council Member
Nelson to accept the Financial Advisory Service Al!reement with Juran & Moody as
presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Page 8 of 18
City of Centerville
August 28, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
2. 2003 Tax Levy - Resolution #02-036
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Mavor Swedben!: to lower the
current 2002 tax levy amount bv So;. for 2003 as that dollar amount $1,406.592
constitutes a So;. reduction in the current levy for next year. Aves - 2. Navs -
3(Travis/Broussard Vickers/Capra). Motion failed.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded bv Council Member
Travis to approve Resolution #02-036 as presented.
Council Member Capra commented that by leaving the levy at last years levy and not
going to the maximum the City is reducing the overall City tax burden on the resident by
15.4%.
Mayor Swedberg commented that. even though he voted for the decrease, he would vote
for this because he is happy that the City will not be raising taxes.
Council Member Nelson explained that her vote would be no because she worked hard to
try to lower the tax levy to provide a 20% savings and that did not get approved.
VOTE: Aves - 4. N avs - l(N elson). Motion carried.
Council recessed at 8:19 p.m.
Council reconvened at 8:25 p.m.
3. Rescheduling of December 25.2002 Council Meeting
Ms. Paulseth indicated that she would recommend Monday, December 9, 2002 for the
truth in taxation hearing with December 16, 2002 as the continuation date.
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to cbanl!e tbe December Council meetinl!s to December 9. 2002 and
December 19. 2002. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
4. Eminent Domain
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded bv Council Member
Capra to cease eminent domain proceedinl!s. Aves - 4. Navs - l(Travis). Motion
carried.
5. Building Permit Fees
Council Member Capra suggested asking Staff to do a surveyor surrounding cities to
determine whether Centerville's fees are too high because she had heard that the City is
25% higher than the Uniform Building Code fees.
Page 9 of 18
l__
City of Centerville
August 28, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she had heard of no problems or
complaints.
Council Member Travis indicated there have been a horrendous amount of complaints as
the building permits in the City are much higher than any other City. He then said he is
concerned that the building permit fees could be challenged causing an issue for the City.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the permit fees need to be related to the expense that
the City incurs in processing those permits. He then said that it may be possible to
challenge the fees but that challenge would not apply to past fees paid.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned the use of the term revenue generating
fees.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated that other fees that have been challenged in other cities
were fees that were termed as revenue generating rather than actually being fees. He then
said that no permit fees are allowed to be revenue generating because that would be
considered a tax.
Council Member Capra indicated the City is looking at a large amount of revenue from
the permit fees and she has a concern with regard to charging 25% over the Uniform
Building Code.
City Attorney Hoeft suggested that Staff should provide information on how the City
justifies the cost of its permits for future reference, if it is needed.
Motion bv Mayor Swedberl!:. seconded by Council Member Nelson to direct Staff to
proyide an analysis ofthe City's fees by the second Council Meetinl!: in November.
Council Member Travis indicated he would like to have Staff do a comparison with the
surrounding communities because he knows the City charges more than neighboring
cities for the same product.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated that it may cost Centerville more to provide the same
service but said that Staff should provide justification for those fees for review.
Council Member Travis said he would bet that Centerville is the highest in the metro and
not by a little bit. He then estimated that the City was charging $3,000 to $4,000 more
than other cities on a single-family home.
Mayor Swedberg amended his motion to include an analysis of the Class 7 cities that
exist in the Stanton group in the metro area. The amendment was accepted by Council
Member Nelson.
VOTE: All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Page 10 of 18
~
City of Centerville
August 28, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
6. Eagle TraillPioneer Properties
Steven St. George of 1861 Pioneer Lane and Mark Pangell addressed Council and asked
for an update of their water situation. Mr. Peterson indicated the individual who was at
the last meeting had not provided surveying information as promised. Ms. Moore-Sykes
indicated the City had received nothing from him either.
Mr. Peterson indicated he was out there after the meeting and walked down the line with
Mr. Palzer and it appears that Mr. Gainers wood railroad ties have a lot to do with the
way it is pinched down there.
Mr. Pangell indicated he agreed that those are not helping the situation but noted those
were only placed there within the last 30 to 40 days. He further indicated he could do
nothing about those railroad ties but has to deal with the water problem caused by them
and the townhome development.
Mr. Pangell indicated that residents could clean out the drainage easement with
wheelbarrows and shovels but said he is not sure they are qualified to do so.
Council Member Capra asked if the area is sodded. Mr. Pangell indicated it is weeds that
are not maintained and there is no sod.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked whether the homeowner's association was
mowing the area.
Mayor Swedberg indicated the bank is very steep and difficult to mow. Mr. Pangell
agreed that the bank is difficult to mow and then commented that the whole development
contained a comedy of engineering flaws.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked for the engineer's opinIOn. Mr. Peterson
indicated there is no problem with the design. He then said that the drainage way should
be more open and commented that the fence is in the drainage way railroad as well as the
railroad ties making the whole thing narrower than it should be.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if the fence and railroad ties were in the
drainage easement. Mr. Peterson indicated it looks to him that they are in the drainage
easement but he would need a survey to know for sure.
Council Member Broussard Vickers commented that the City would have the authority to
have those items removed if they are in the drainage way. She then commented that the
drainage easement cannot be impeded.
Mr. St. George asked whether the area was graded properly in the first place. Mr.
Peterson indicated it was not the City's job as the developer had his own engineer design
that property. The City approves the plan but did not design it.
Page 11 of18
L __ __ _ _ _ .
City of Centerville
August 28, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked whether the City had a responsibility to the
residents to make sure the grading was done properly or if it was a civil issue.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated the problem is a civil issue for the property owners.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the City could provide assistance to the
property owners to provide them with the approved plans but they would need to
determine whether it was done improperly and proceed against the developer, if
necessary. She then said that the City can determine whether there are things located in
the drainage easement and, if so, have them removed.
Mr. Pangell said he did not understand how it was not permissible for a property owner to
put the railroad ties in the drainage easement but the City does not have to help them with
a developer who allowed soil to erode and fill in the drainage way.
City Attorney Hoeft clarified that the City, in providing inspection or approval services,
in no way makes any representations that the final product will match what is on the plan.
Mayor Swedberg asked if there would be an issue if the neighbors got together and dug
out the drainage easement.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated he would not recommend doing so because any issues
caused by the actions of the property owners would open them up to financial liability.
He then said that alleviating their water issue may cause a water issue for someone else
that they would be responsible for.
Mayor Swedberg asked if each person could dig on their own property. Mr. Peterson
indicated he did not see how the area could be dug out any more than it is.
Mr. Pangell indicated the drainage area is too high because he has standing water. He
then asked what he could do when someone else raises their grade higher.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that no one could change the grade to
impede flow.
Council Member Capra indicated she would like to see whether the drainage easements
are filling in or have filled in onto the drainage easement to abrupt the flow. Mr.
Peterson indicated he would need a survey to determine that.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned whether the developers agreement states
that the developer is required to prevent the erosion of soil into a drainage easement.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated that from what he has heard from the engineer we are not
sure if there is a problem there. He then said he appreciates the comments of the property
Page 12 of 18
City of Centerville
August 28, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
owners concerning standing water but he fIrst needs to have information proving there is
a problem with the grade.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated that just because water collects there does not mean the
grading is improper. He then said the fIrst thing that someone would have to do is take
measurements to tell what the elevations are and determine whether it is a problem.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if there was noticeable erosion behind the
townhomes. Mr. Peterson indicated the area is weedy with tall weeds right up to the
fence and then there is the ditch. He then said that he did not see piles of dirt that totally
impeded the flow.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she would like to see Mr. Palzer check the
fence and railroad ties and take a look at the weeds. She then said that, if there are
weeds, a letter should be sent to the homeowner association asking that they be cut down.
She also requested that whomever has something located in the drainage easement
receive a letter asking that it be moved.
Mr. Peterson indicated the property owners could put drain tile from your property and
run it down to the pond which would help.
Mr. Pangell indicated that their biggest problem is there is an association that represents a
string of property and they are not sure how to contact them.
Council Member Broussard Vickers suggested asking one of the homeowners for the
name and telephone number of the president of the association.
Council Member Nelson recommended contacting Ms. Moore-Sykes to help provide
information on the president of the townhome association.
Mr. Pangell thanked Council for the assistance and asked for assistance with the
enforcement of the blockage issue.
7. Proposed Ordinance #13 - Liquor
Council Member Nelson indicated that a whole section on Page 2 of 18 under restaurant
was deleted. She also indicated that the word "not" was deleted and "as long as currently
licensed as such by Anoka County" was added.
Council Member Broussard Vickers explained that the reason the word "not" was taken
out was for people who serve frozen pizzas. She then clarifIed that taking the word "not"
out made them a restaurant because they are licensed by Anoka County.
Council agreed that the language was fine. City Attorney Hoeft indicated he had deleted
that language.
Pagel30fl8
L___________
City of Centerville
August 28, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Council Member Nelson asked for clarification of the sidewalk language on Page 8 of 18.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated the only time the City is looking at a parking lot or
sidewalk situation is with a temporary permit for operation outside of the premises and
Council has the ability, without the language, to either allow someone or not allow
someone to utilize a sidewalk or parking lot.
Council agreed the language was fine.
Council Member Nelson indicated there was a reference to financial investigation on
Page 10 of 18 that should be removed. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that any reference
to a financial investigation should be deleted.
Council Member Nelson asked for clarification on Section 16 on that same page
concerning approval by the Commissioner of Public Safety. City Attorney Hoeft
indicated that is a state requirement.
Council Member Nelson suggested adding clarification to the language on Page 15 of 18
concerning violations.
Mayor Swedberg suggested that a parenthesis be added and language that says "see
addendum" be added. He then said it is the intention of Council that the ordinance does
not need to be redone to make minor modifications in the best practices program
addendum so he thought it would be appropriate to reference it in the best practices
program and date that addendum.
Council Member Nelson suggested saying the most current addendum. City Attorney
Hoeft indicated that it would be fine to add the reference to the addendum.
Council Member Nelson suggested indicating on Page 17 of 18 under best practice
penalty grid that the licensee reverts to the regular penalty grid at the third violation.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated that language could be inserted.
Mayor Swedberg suggested that the part that starts with training program right above
where it lists the mandatory items the last sentence should be deleted as well as the next
paragraph.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated there would be no problem removing that sentence and the
next paragraph.
Mayor Swedberg commented that the City had substantially rewritten this Ordinance and
asked whether it should remain as Ordinance #13 or be renumbered. City Attorney Hoeft
suggested keeping it as Ordinance #13 for future reference.
Motion by Council Member Nelson, seconded by Mayor Swedber2 to approve
Ordinance #13 - Possession, Sale and Consumption of Intoxicatin2 Liquor, Wine
Pagel4ofl8
City of Centerville
August 28,2002
Council Meeting Minutes
and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Within the City of Centerville. Ayes - 4, Nays -
l(Broussard Vickers). Motion carried.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she was opposed to removing the reference
to conviction.
VI. CONSENT AGENDA
1. The City of Centerville August 15, 2002 through August 28, 2002 Claims for
Approval
2. Centennial Fire District August 21,2002 Claims
3. Pay Estimate #1 ~ Earth Burners (County Road 14 Water Main Extension)
Motion by Council Member Nelson, seconded by Council Member Broussard
Vickers to approve the Consent Al!enda as presented. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
VII. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES
1. August 14. 2002 Council Meeting Minutes
Council Member Capra requested the following change: On Page 2 of 21 change "no" to
"now,"
Ms. Moore-Sykes requested the following change: On Page 11 of 21 change the word
Hletter" to "article".
2. August 12.2002 Council Work Session Minutes
3. August 19.2002 Council Work Session Minutes
Motion by Council Member Nelson, seconded by Council Member Broussard
Vickers to approve the Aueust 12, 14, and 19, 2002 Council Meetine Minutes as
amended. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Council Member Travis abstained from voting on the August 12, and August 19,2002
Minutes as he was not present at the meeting.
VIII. ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES
1. 1540 Peltier Lake Drive
City Attorney Hoeft indicated he met with City Staff last week and as a result the
property was visited by the building official and Centennial Lakes police officers. He
indicated that the findings of those two reports were used to sustain the request for an
administrative search warrant which he expects to be completed next week. He then
Page 15 of18
L____ . .
City of Centerville
August 28, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
asked if Council wanted him to present the request to a judge for signature or present it at
the next Council meeting.
Council indicated that it should be presented to the judge.
City Attomey Hoeft indicated that the officer was extremely concemed about the
occupants health and safety and made that clear in his report.
A resident asked if the report was public information.
City Attomey Hoeft indicated the information was not public at this time. He then said
he expected to have an administrative search warrant within a week presented to the
judge. He also indicated that at the time the warrant is executed the police and fire
departments will be there as well as an Anoka County representative.
Mary Jane Lang of 15559 Peltier said she cannot understand this delay because some
years back she owned a lot on the other side of Donna and she had puddles in the yard
and could not cut the grass and received a letter from the City indicating that it should be
cut or the City would do it and bill her. She then asked why the process is taking so long
for this property owner.
Council Member Nelson indicated that the City has mowed the lawn previously as well
as clean up the exterior and now the City is trying to do something more permanent to
clear up the problem.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated there have been court proceedings involving this property
for code violations including the overgrowth of the property and, while that is a concern,
right now the concern that is being addressed is not the grass and weeds but the
conditions inside the house for the resident.
Council Member Capra indicated this is the first time City officials will have been inside.
A resident asked whether the outside would be dealt with as well as the inside of the
property. City Attorney Hoeft indicated the entire property, both inside and out, would
be addressed.
Council Member Nelson questioned whether the City needed to review a right-of-way
ordinance. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated the right-of-way ordinance is before the Planning
and Zoning Commission for review.
Mayor Swedberg asked that Mr. Peterson and City Attorney Hoeft review it.
Council Member Nelson asked for an update on the two complaints. She then referenced
a letter sent by the City Administrator that had asked that the situation be abated within
30 days and asked what abated means. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the property
owner needs to cut the weeds to eliminate the violation.
Page 16 of 18
City of Centerville
August 28, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Council Member Nelson asked for an update on the complaint from 6961 Meadow Court
concerning the sealcoating on his street. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated his street was
sealcoated and he is not pleased with the rocks. Mr. Peterson indicated that, in time, the
rocks would all be pushed in.
Council Member Nelson asked for an update on the Glenn Powers property on Quebec
Street. Mr. Peterson indicated he had provided a quote from Ro-So Contracting.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked why the City would pay to assist Mr. Powers
with his water issue if it is not going to do the same for the two gentlemen that were just
before Council.
Mr. Peterson indicated it is not quite the same thing as Mr. Powers grade is dead flat
versus the \ % of the other property.
Council Member Broussard Vickers commented that the dead flat is no more the City's
responsibility than the 1 % if a proper plan was approved.
Council Member Capra commented that the grade at the end of the project is lower than
what it was supposed to be. Mr. Peterson indicated a lot of low areas were created.
Council Member Capra asked if the City would have inspected the grade. Council
Member Broussard Vickers asked how many property owners this involved. Mr.
Peterson indicated it involved four property owners.
Council Member Nelson indicated the property owners would need to sue the developer.
Council Member Broussard Vickers suggested sending the bid to them and letting them
decide if they want to contract the work.
Council Member Capra asked if the City has a responsibility if the City approved the
grade and it is not right. City Attorney Hoeft indicated the City approves the grading
plan and, if the City approves a grading plan that is poor, the City may have some
obligation. He further clarified that the City approves the grading plan and does not
ensure that the final product will match what is on that plan.
Council Member Capra indicated there is a public safety issue with this lot as his sump
pump runs nonstop even in the winter and pumps water out into the street that freezes and
causes slippery conditions.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the Attorney has said the City has no legal
obligation and the City does not have the fmancials to do it.
Council Member Nelson indicated she agreed with sending a letter to them with the
suggested fix and letting them know the City cannot pay to fix it for them.
Pagel70fl8
l
City of CentervilJe
August 28, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Council Member Capra indicated her concern lies with the amount of water that he has to
get off of his property that ends up in the streets and freezes in winter.
Council Member Broussard Vickers commented the person with the worst water problem
has nowhere to put the water. She then suggested the City absorb the cost of the street
portion to do the work that would drain the property.
Mayor Swedberg asked if it was possible to put a drain on the inside of the curb. Mr.
Peterson indicated that could be looked into and said he could run drain tile to the catch
basin.
Council asked Staffto send a letter to the residents and assist them by meeting with them
ifthe residents desire.
Mayor Swedberg asked that Staff proceed with all due speed on the collection of the
costs from Mr. Eibensteiner who has said he will not pay the charges.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated he would review the contracts to determine what, if
anything, can be done and provide advice to Council at the next meeting.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council Member
Nelson to adiourn the AUl!:ust 28, 2002 City Council Meetinl!: at 9;45 p.m. All in
favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Transcribed by:
Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
Page 18 of18
1
,.
City of CentervilIe
City Council Meeting
September 11, 2002
To:
Ms. Kim Moore-Sykes
Honorable Mayor and Members ofthe City Council
From:
ElIen Paulseth, Finance Director
Re:
Capital Projects
Attached is an updated reconciliation of the capital projects funds. The following activity
has taken place since the last update;
. Mr. Mike Quigley met with Ms. Moore-Sykes and me early this week and paid up
both Eagle Pass Projects. Additionally, he has met all other requirements to date
(see attached.)
. The M.S. 429 Project (Hunter's Crossing, Parkview, and Pheasant Marsh)
obligations were paid with bond proceeds.
. The Clearwater Meadows Project was closed out by the city several years ago and
is probably not collectible.
. The amount due from the Willow Glen Project is negligible and may not be worth
pursumg.
. The remaining six project files have been turned over to city attorney Hoeft.
,
~
City of Centerville
- Reconciliation of Capital Projects Funds "--..
-- June 30, 2002
Private E-
Cash
r Fees Improvements _ Total
- --
- Buechler Estates 1,414.~ 500.00 1,914.35
Center Villa 13,259.47 -, 3,150.00 16,409.47
-
ClealWater Meadows 2,339.90 2,400.00 4,739.90
- Deer Pass 11,953.62 3,025.00 14,978.62
Eagle Pass I 0.00 0.00 O.QQ
- ,
Eagle Pass II 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hunters Crossing 0.00 0.00 0.00
lakeland Hills 50,097.~ 3,850.00 53,947.86
Parkview 0.00 0.00 0.00
k- !,heasant Marsh ~ 0.00 0.00
Royal Oaks Industrial Park 32,587.26, 3,200.001 35,787.26
'-
The Shores 0.00 0.00 0.00
Willow Glen 0.001 459.06 459.06
k- Woods of ClealWater cree=tt 11 ,59~ 3,325.00 +---14,923.11-
L 123,250.571- i '._
19,909.06 143,159.63
9/4/2002
10:30 AM
capital projects reconciliation
~
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
Revenues Expenditures
109,130.00 68,537.77
21,154.00 55,917.88
3.00 12,518.00
0.00 4,099.26
0.00 0.00
130,287.00 141,072.91
'i
Eagle Pass
Balance
40,592.23
5,828.35
-6,686.65
-10,785.91
-10,785.91
Chronology
28-May-96 Received $2,000 escrow deposit from Gor-Em
2-Aug-96 Received $66,500 escrow deposit from Gar-Em
20-Nov-96 Received $40,000 escrow deposit from Gar-Em
31-Dec-96 Interest accrued in the amount of $630
1-Apr-97 Received $20,000 escrow deposit from Gar-Em
31-Dec-97 Interest accrued in the amount of $1,154
31-Dec-98 Interest accrued in the amount of $3
30-May-02 Costs to date - $141,073
Credit for Oversizing Water Main
Due to Stormwater Fund
Credit for Stormwater Overcharge
Due to General Fund - adm
Due to General Fund - private imp
Due to Trail Fund
Total Due from Developer
Breakdown of escrow deposits:
Stormwater fees $44,244.85
Eagle Trail extension $1,850.00
Plat filing - preliminary $200.00
Plat filing - final $200.00
Administration fees $11,400.00
Engineering $70,605.15
$128,500.00
9/4/2002
37,307.50
-44,244.85
3,998.64
-11,800.00
-6,250.00
-1,850.00
-33,624.62
o~
I
9:27 AM
Od-/
fA'Y
.,; 1~4+
\C ~y.jl\
I) 'J, if""
tlpyl
eaglepass
'\
City of Centerville
Capital Projects Checklist
Project: &1.1 Ie /1(156 _IT
1.._"
1. Signed Developer's Agreement
4-0' r,~_ /);Z
I "~ ~-, .
"
2. Security for Private Improvements
Irrevocable letter of credit, or
Certified check, or
~~~t=)
3. Cash Fees
Park Dedication
Trail Dedication
Stormwater Fees v
Plat Fees y'
1./;' 5"CJ;L
-</ -;; 5- () ;),~
q.- 3"'o~
5. Liability Insurance
q-.3-0~
9 ~ ,3 .- ci d-.
4. Engineering & Legal Escrow
6. Payment of City Costs - Private Improvements
(before release of security)
Approved for Release of Mylars:
City Administrator
Date
Approved for Release of Security:
City Administrator
Date
/
L~. Eagle Pass II
Capital Project Fund
Developer's-Agreement Signed: Aoril 24, 2002 ~
Gor-Em, LLC_---t1
DeveJooer:
1875 Commercial Blvd. NW
Andover, MN 553041 .~
~ (763\755-6554 I I ~-
Contact: Mike Quiglev
- I I
I 1 i
Security for Private Improvements ~ City Billing for Private IrTinrovements
Street name signs _ $250.00
Traffic signs $600.00. -
Utility Markers $0,00
Street Sweeping $1.500.00 -
Silt fence and gravel $100.00 ~ .-
Ffushinnstorm sewers $500.00. ..-
Street lights $7,500.00 i--
Shade trees $11.000.00
Sod $15.000.00
Snowniow services $800.00 -
CitVadministration $1.600.00
Televise s~nitary sewer $200.00 .- : -
Retainage $19.525.00 ~.
i .
- $58,575.00 - ---
~_~I Security Deposit. ck#2119 April 25, 2002 . 1-
(to be completed by July 1, 2003\ I 1 --
I I I
"
~~5h Fees -
.-
Park Dedication $0.00 nla -
Trail Dedication $0.00 nla
- Storm Water Fees $3,998.64 od April 25, 2002 (stormlNater fund) -~
Plat Fees $5.000.00 pd September 3, 2002 ck #2206 -.--
$8,998.64\ I
Total Cash Fees ----+-
J
Escrow ; -~=
Engjne~.dng Escrow -$20.000.00, pd se:t::.:::.:~r2 ck #T6 .. ..=
(inspectiort, staking and construction adm.)
Total Escrow ~ ~I
Charges .t\gainst Escrow Account I .~.. ~I-+
Enaineering: .-
Mav 2002. -$596.40 . - ~ .. ---
May 2002 -$9,420.08
June 2002 -$1,358.77
June 2002 -$306.95 -
L~uly 2002 -$6,194.11
L.July 2002 -$221.15
L- -$18,097.46
Total Engineering ~. .-
~~ertising: $0.001
-
Total Advertising - $0.00
,
Balance in Escrow Account: $1,902.54 I --
I r
9/5/2002
1:04PM
capital project spreadsheet eagle pass II
\.
Liability Insurance Required Provided
Bodily Injury:
Each Occurance $600,000.00 $1,000,000.00
0Ll}Jit $1,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00 .
Property Daman.: ..--
Each Occurance $300,000.00 $1,000,000.00
Limit $700,000.00 $1,000,000.00 -..-
~.9med as Additional insured no X .
I" .-
-. .-
North Star Mutual Insurance Co. '-
Certificate Provided By: T
Minnewaska Insurance Agency ..~
P.O. Box 717 I -
Starbuck, MN 56381 I ..
Policv No. : CG68972 ----
Effective Dates: 6/01/02 to 6/01/03
1II11llllliJllDlllllllm T !
iIIlIIlI' lIIlIIlII
Date of Project Closing:
.
cc: Administrator ..
Finance
City Clerk
City Engineer L
Public Works orrector I I
,
9/5/2002
1:04 PM
capital project spreadsheet eagle pass II
0'"
" ,/i i'
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Teresa Bender, City Clerk 1'~'
SUBJECT: Building Permit Fee Review
DATE: September 6, 2002
To date, I have contacted the cities of Lino Lakes and Hugo in regards to their fees
charged for new construction, residential building permits, I have received a response
from the City of Lino Lakes; however, I will be contacting them on Monday for
additional information pertaining to same. I have not received a response from the City
of Hugo and will be contacting them again shortly.
I intend on contacting the Cities of Circle Pines, Lexington and Blaine also and forward
all findings when completed.
f"
Centerville Lions - Branch Club
2002 Concession sales - Laurie LaMotte Park
Revenues
Pop................................... ...156 @ $.50................. .$78.00
Water................................... .54 @ $1.00.............. ...$54.00
Chips. ...... ....... ...... .............. ..60 @ $.75......... ..........$30.00
Candy Bars.... ... ................... ...70 @ $.75................. ...$52.50
Granola Bars.......... ..... ........... .35 @ $.50................. ...$17.50
Gummi Candy....................... ...72 @ $1.00................. .$72.00
Pixie Stix............................. ...150 @ $.50................. .$75.00
Licorice............................... ...50 @ $.50................. ...$25.00
Gum.......................... ......... ...60 @ $1.00................. .$60.00
Sunflower Seeds........................ 70 @ $.50................. ..$35.00
Total Revenues......................................................... ..$499.00
Expenses
Rainbow (5/20/02)............................................... .$24.46
Sam's Club (5/19/02)............................................ .$59.81
Sam's Club (6/10/02)............................................ .$67.06
Sam's Club (5/28/02)............................................ .$45.71
Cub Foods (6/17/02)......................................... .....$19.83
Sam's Club (6/24/02)............................................ .$62.27
Sam's Club (6/17/02)............................................ .$58.02
Total ExDenses........................................................... ..$340.16
Cash Deposit (Includes Donations)...................$185.40
20% to Park and Rec...................................$37.08
.
'Esta6[isl1ed 1857
1680 Main Street
CentelViUe, Minnesota 55038
(651) 429-3232
RECEIVED OF
CentervUle Lions Branch Club $37.08
Kathy Peil
FOR:
20% Donation to Parks and Ck #1004
Recreation Committee from the Lions
Branch Club. Concession Sales
Account Code Ameunt
..(\
\\
~ ~~~
rl
^ ""
\\t",l ;,
~\~
dA'f ~\'-<I
'\\ 1\
~
BY Kim Stephan
September 5. 2002
Receipt # 7848
.
tervi[[e
'Lstafj[ishd 1857
1880 :Main Street . Centerviffe, 'M!J{ 55038
, (651) 429-3232 . 1'wc (651) 429-8629
September 3, 2002
Mr. & Mrs. Rick Hollenkamp
6922 Dupre Road
Centerville, MN 55038
Dear Mr. & Mrs, Hollenkamp:
It has brought to the City's attention that you are in violation of the City's Ordinance #4,
Division 65: Accessory Structures and Uses (Pages 17 & 18). Your most recent
construction of an 18' x 18' accessory structure is in compliance with Ordinance #4;
however, the size does not allow for an additional accessory structure. It was also
brought to the City's attention that your are storing the following items outside for a
period exceeding 48 hours which is also a violation of the City's Ordinance #4, Section
130-140: Outside Storage (pages 38 & 39). Copies of both referenced sections have
been included for your review.
The City requests that you abate these violations within 30 days of the receipt of this
notice. Failure to do so will warrant the City to commence enforcement of same, Please
find the enclosed copy of Ordinance #4, Pages 58 & 59, Division 200 & Division 205.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter and if you have any additional
questions regarding this issue, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
0~~-
- t ::t:~ore-SYkeS
City Administrator
KMS/tdb
Enclosures
Cc: Honorable Mayor and Council
"
ervi{{e
1880 Main Street . CenteroilJe, M:A[ 55038
(651) 429-3232 . 'J~ (651) 429-8629
September 3, 2002
Ms, LeAnn Lindgren
1859 Center Street
Centerville, MN 55038
Dear Ms, Lindgren:
Subsequent to receiving your complaint regarding a recently constructed accessory
building located at 6922 Dupre Road, Your measurement of 18' 2" x 18' 2" is inaccurate
due to the fact that the measurements that should be used are the foundation size, Our
Building Official has measured same and found it to be 18' x 18' which is allowable
under Ordinance #4, Division 65: Accessory Structures and Uses,
The owners of 6922 Dupre Road have been notified that they have 30 days to remove the
other accessory structure and the number of items stored outside, If they do not comply
with this request, the City will be warranted to commence enforcement of same.
If you have any additional questions regarding this issue, please feel free to contact me,
Sincerely,
)~-
Kim oon~-Sykes
City Administrator
!
KMS/tdb
Enclosures
Cc: Honorable Mayor and Council
-'\
,\ nr 1/'-'"
~ ts~~\~ \vJi~.~kvV
\ '. -\ . J'
() ',\ /,/ ')
~,/ l})' N"~
\, \, () /, ,
(I , ' ,-r- I( ~/&
,. YJI (/ C51 0 rJ ~ S LJ~;;J ~,~C-"W
tf 2 b --. "
tfYYI: ), 'N.-e('?:/./'/f2)Q~k-...,d',~/.~1.a).".~U4<2'(~
/ I L/.' U~
iud1>1 kvt!/'TwlUJ ,'~2' /~~-:~lf~l_u.~aD~; .us; , fd-
II ;2 /D t.t:, ,~. .4A:J.fJ~uI t'.L7I-I(-l~=~'C/LL7
i/
1/0(.1..: ,G
,I '.I'
I iJ
17
df s-,
I;;.'~'~"
.\~. '~-4.. /
i~ ~
.~"'i",,_,.<t "._m
",. [,) db. ~121//I.. - ."9~ ~:7f"'~ .~c?<<l
(-:'" ~6' ~ fr-~
~;; _.Jr(---. ~.'.'r ..1.' '. I~!!' 23 )( _ /~.C.. ...' It) 30)',3 Sj r
! .2722. of ~V( Yty -: 32 ~\ I sf. /f.
~ (! ;'; .:- .'7 /,:,.
~' . -:p\y,,)',ffi:"l' Sl~ J 4;')<. tic;:; -"".2:':-1
l tit c Z:.)Sc r V <; iri! eohLcCc.. - I R ':f." )( I it 2 /I ~
330 5'7' -f+, /~. l1 rJ 8'. n ~ 330 sy.f
I
~,
"\j
~,
..:
",",
i1J'~
" ~ .
, \ ~
'- "
'<
J. tict C'>5Qrc!
fJ..: Ilit'lJ ''If:J{:/{?cL'f. Z- X II, 0 (
.....t;:,/fd. dC, 2"'15 Sc;,J1, cV
<0L;:.,~ ~ ~ I
-e""eue&
fi>< I 2-
CZ "f Yj F+,
,',
::~,
'~
"~ t7/YLL, ~ ~ /177/tA( ~
{.~/rv~ -' itl? -=712Cr.
J/J~ .
\c /2--\4'{~, Kf...
-Rw.fi .
---' .
fUL.?IIL L",ZT1.,,J
o
;k LhjU ,> p~'r.A.'fXL tt
+0 6i-j;.lt-u ;,-,)yUC,--;J-t<.'r.iitLf!;
. ~
"""" /iI '. II
;~ T:J7/t-0i:/( '.
.......0 ,"
'f:':j'~L~ .
" :+ 9] J:i'
'1/ U /Zc-o z.- /_...
U~~Gjr bl...> ......
B;{;'Vi
61,/ /;-'6'"
"U q '}u
ct-y /lj_....;';
"-
ervi{{e
1880 :Main Street . Centervi/le, :M'J{ 55038
, (651) 429-3232 .:r~ (651) 429-8629
September 3,2002
Mr. & Mrs. Keith Jovanovich
7269 Old Mill Road
Centerville, MN 55038
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Jovanivich:
It has brought to the City's attention that a recently installed chain-link fence on your
property was placed directly on the property line without abutting neighbor's
permission/letter on file with the city as stated in Ordinance #4, Division 100: Fences.
Enclosed is a copy for your reference.
The City requests that you abate this violation within 30 days of the receipt of this notice.
Failure to do so will warrant the City to commence enforcement of same. Please find the
enclosed copy of Ordinance #4, Pages 58 & 59, Division 200 & Division 205.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter and if you have any additional
questions regarding this issue, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
i~}J~-
!~~oore-SYkeS /
City Administrator
J---'"
KMS/tdb
Enclosures
Cc: Honorable Mayor and Council
tervi[[e
'Esta6fisfwf 1857
1880 Main Street . Centerville, !lvL'I[ 55038
, (651) 429-3232 .;Fax: (651) 429.8629
September 4, 2002
Mr. & Mrs. Mark Hobscheid
7277 Old Mill Road
CentervilIe, MN 55038
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Hobscheid:
Thank you for your recent letter concerning several issues with the residence located at
7269 Old Mill Road.
Pursuant to several inspections of the pool installation (including pump and filter) and
fence construction, an inspection of the grass length around the house, garage, pool and
fence has been completed by our Building Inspector. The only item that is currently in
violation is the fence and its construction on the property line without the proper
permission filed with the City. As per City Ordinance #4 if this permission is not
received, the fence must be installed two (2) feet from the lot line.
A letter was forwarded to the owners of 7269 Old Mill Road in regards to the location of
the fence and a request for abatement of same within 30 days from the time of receipt of
the letter.
You had some additional concerns regarding the noise omitted by the pool's pump and
filter system. Enclosed, please find a copy of the City's Ordinance #49 relating to noise
and a copy the City's Ordinance #4, Division 130: Nuisance Standards, Section 130-030
(page 37) for your reference The Building Inspector stated that the noise omitted by the
pump and filter are less than a standard air conditioning unit.
As I stated in our telephone conversation of yesterday, I will be forwarding your letter
and ail correspondence to Council for their review. If you have any further questions
regarding these issues, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
.-1
- ./I~ #'
c:. c--=y~~~d.:/",-"
Teresa D. Bender
City Clerk
Enclosures
Cc: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
/"
September 3, 2002
City of CenterviIle
Attn: Building Official
1880 Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038
Dear Sir,
Recently our neighbors at 7269 Old Mill Road put a fence up on their property that does
not comply with the city ordinance. On July 22 we spoke with the property owners and
expressed our concerns and discussed what we thought would be acceptable resolutions
to the problems. On July 24 the property owner asked for a week or two to decide what
action to take. Unfortunately after six weeks they have not contacted us or taken any
action to resolve the issues. We feel we now need to ask the city to enforce the ordinance
that is in violation.
Our specific concern is the placement of the fence inches from the property line without
our consent. We also have concerns regarding a pool filter that was installed near the lot
line and if it is within the acceptable noise limits. Lastly, we have concerns regarding the
storage of property next to the garage and the lack of maintenance on this area. The
weeds in this area have not been trimmed since the pool was installed approx. seven
weeks ago. Nor has the grass been trimmed along the north side of the fence since it was
installed.
We appreciate your assistance in resolving these issues. If you need any additional
information please feel free to contact us at 651-653-8442.
Sincerely,
~~
Mark & Cindy Hobscheid
7277 Old Mill Road
Centerville, MN 55038
itervi{{e
'Estafj(isfid 1857
1880 Main Street . Centervi[[e, M'l\L 55038
(651) 429-3232 . 'Fil;t (651) 429-8629
September 3,2002
Mr. Michael Kodluboy
1955 Eagle Trail
Centerville, MN 55038
Dear Mr. Kodluboy:
It recently was brought to the City's attention that the length of your weeds in your yard
exceeds eight inches in height and is a violation of City Ordinance #54. A copy of same
is enclosed for your reference. Also enclosed, you will find a copy of City Ordinance #4,
Division 75: Final Grading and Landscaping, Subd. #2. You are also in violation of this
Division due to the fact that you do not have sod installed in your front or side yards
within the allotted six months from the issuance of the occupancy permit for your
residence. Same was issued on September 6,2001.
The City requests that you abate both violations within 30 days of the receipt of this
notice. Failure to do so will warrant the City to commence enforcement of same. Please
find the enclosed copy of Ordinance #4, Pages 58 & 59, Division 200 & Division 205.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter and if you have any additional
questions regarding this issue, please feel free to contact me.
Sincere".'
/-~/ /// /1-
C-;<tt ~_
Ki Moore-Sykes
City Administrator -
KMS/tdb
Enclosures
Cc: Honorable Mayor and Council
ervi[[e
'Estabfished 1857
1880 Main Street . Centervir[e, M:J{ 55038
(651) 429-3232 . :Tal( (651) 429-8629
September 3, 2002
Mr. & Mrs. Joe Steele
6926 Sumac Court
Centerville, MN 55038
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Steele:
It has been brought to the City's attention that you have the following items stored in
your yard. Enclosed, please find a copy of Ordinance #4 Pages 38 & 39, Section 130-
140: Outside Storage. Currently you have the following stored in your yard:
2 snowmobiles w/sleds
2 lawn tractors
1 boat on a trailer
1 camper
The City requests that you abate this violation within 30 days of the receipt of this notice.
Failure to do so will warrant the City to commence enforcement of same. Please find the
enclosed copy of Ordinance #4, Pages 58 & 59, Division 200 & Division 205.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter and if you have any additional
questions regarding this issue, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
~~)~_/
{~~ore-SYkeS I
City Administrator v
KMS/tdb
Enclosures
Cc: Honorable Mayor and Council
Sent By: Great Lake. Management Co j
763 377 73a7;
Aug-30-0210:01;
MaIY Selh 0a\Il0
c~ of CernniIIII
JoMIII_
Tim va_
',", "
l+~ '[
Iii
'j::. i
_1:: I
1<::' j
U.::, i
r~; 1
l:::::, !
:Ii:.,.,.,. i
">: j
j,:;; i
i::: ;
.f) i
:j,:;; i
I ':~' i
J j Chauncey Borett Gardens
J, i Centerville. MN
i;~ecutive Morkeflng Summary
Ii j August 19 . August 25, 2002
,I".:
:L~I, J
,',:'"'
fIIc
lIIl:esl~
!Ill; m=~ge2
fIIc 78>>23 5$!2
T olal Units 2 6 8
Leased this Period 0 0 0
Tolal Units Leased 2 6 8
OT At " LEASED i 100% ,. 100%
Vocor'\c1es
Total Units Vacant 0 0 0
Totell Units Occupied 2 6 8
A % 1
Page 111
Eugene D. Johnson, Publisher 4779 Bloom Ave., White Bear Lake, Mn 55 110 .651-407-1200 . Fax: 65 J -42 9-1 242
August 31, 2002
Dear Advertiser:
Thank you for your business during the past year.
Striving to offer the highest quality publication to our readers, as well as an excellent
marketing opportunity to you, requires keeping pace with technology. As a result of our
increased costs, we will be instituting a nominal increase effective September 16, 2002.
Thanks again for your continued business!
Sincerely,
~J3
Tina Rodriguez
Marketing Director
Your Best Source For Community Information
White Bear Press. Vadnais Heights Press. St. Croix Valley Press. Quad Community Press. Shoreview Press. Forest Lake Press
ppnews@sherbtel.net ppcomp@sherbtel.net ppadvertising@sherbtel.net ppcirc@sherbtel.net
I
City Council Presentation
c;,.. -e;.>
City Council Presentation
V\7'ha t is
:Being
propose
If Approved, This Would
,Provide An Additional L""' etX"
, I/~'U'-().>~ I
r=t $426 per dent
cAJ id-'11
(f&>'<x '
$3,403,161 annually
Minnesota State
$.38
$1,291,197
Local Levy
$.62
$2,11l,964
+i't(L d.~i-u"r- t-"" i"-6,C'7
Why N.w? .....
Forest Lake
Wbite Bear Lake (seeking S3S8 in Nov)
$650
$499
($887) if pass
$328
1. Uncertain future state
funding
2. Slewed enreUment
grewth
3. Sch..l district expenses
will centinue te grew
Statewide Average
Roseville (passed 5227 in Sept)
Mounds 'View
Centennial (seeking $426 in Nov)
$832
For 1003.04
$39
Spring Lake Park (passed $510 in Sept)
1
City Council Presentation
Maintaining Academie
Excellence
.
Basie Standards Test Results
~
ill"ot ill\\\ \-\OPP (\ W ,"e.
~t()P()SaO\ \Sa ~e.\e.c.te.
Necessitate Future Cuts
~Reduce budgets for staff
traini workshops,
mini-gra and
curriculum ies.
IIIIII
~Reduce support se
(personnel:
administration, deans,
counselors, social
workers, psychologists,
media specialists,
technology coordinators,
secretaries, custodians)
3
City Council Presentation
."
Increase Class Sizes At Most Levels
Reduce After-School
Activities at Middle School
and Hi h S 001
a::> Increase Participation Fees
a::> Eliminate late buses for students
IWIDelay frequency or updating
textbooks and other c sroom
materials.
Grade Current Class Size
Ratio Districtwide
Average Ranges
Kindergarten 17-19 to 1
18-20 to 1
2 19-22 to 1
3 23-26 to 1
4-5 26-29 to 1
6-8 28-30 to 1
9-12 30-32 to 1
Red\)c.e 1 tQf\SpottQt\Of\ SeN\c.es
:>By Increasing walk zones at all grade
levels
- no busing inside 2 miles for secondary, I mile
elementary, redefine hazardous streets
Potential Increase
20-22 to
21-24 to 1
25-28 to 1
28-31 to 1
32-35 to 1
32-35 to 1
4
Financial Information
Fer Student
Operatin
iI 2002-03
Forest Lake
White Bear Lake (Referendum for $388
increase in November
Mounds View
Spring Lake Park (Referendum for $510
increase in Se
Centennial (Referendum for $426 increase in
Nov
Current and Future Challen es:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Metro Rank
36 of 41
41 of 41
380f41
41 of 41
17 of41
26 of 41
29 of 41
30 of 41
39 of 41
Attracting and retaining high quality staff
Providing for a student population becoming more diverse and demonstrating more at-risk
characteristics
Maintaining and updating curriculum
Maintaining and updating technology
Providing sufficient financial resources
to meet increasing costs
Improving equity funding
Many
learners
'1Mith one
goal:
Excellen.ce
2
I .
'lJate: CJ/lr/uo 2-
1880 :Main Street . Centervi!k,:M9{ 55038
(551) 429-3232 . ~/lJ( (551) 429-8529
5fu-~ ~ -
~ +fa 1lt)~1-~~ ~
,0. ~ fJVv1uL~f- jIz)2 ~.
<>fW ~ !ru712k ~ ~~
C, ~ 7xe * f3tZ4-~ flV-b
,
~7/}1tt-&/I--u~ vn, .fvH~ ~ I
#3 ,', {-r'/1
'j; ~; JL<: ~l 9L&Yf
. (u" ~U-.?~ ~Hv-- ~(f:6
dt:.. C1:~~ ,., -~ ~
b ~YLeAi--X'
,~ -i:: 7~ try-
:flu (Il":- ( "
po r F",
~
iF',
d'
/'
.
"Ia
.-
.,:
.. "
~
.
.
.
4"'-
'(l
~
.
-
-~
.
:
.
..
'~.'"
,."... .""
'J>
~<
'-
I
.
. i
.'
!
.
..
.,.p
~
.
---,
'I:.
~'
...
'"
....
-..,"
,
..
i:-~ .
...
'.- ".;.
'.' -:;-
- . ~'~V~.. r:~
.
""
--
/---
~
~
ul
.--!J
.::t
j- .
ad
0
Y-
.
-
-
.
-
.
'.
,.-....
l '"
......
. .
.
..
.
--
tv
')
~
~
I d
-1j
o
cr+-
.
.
..
, ..-
l..
,
-,.
.
[~~t~OOm'
,.
~.
-1IIL _..
..I1Iiii7''' '.. .. .:
.
to
3
~
d
-;2
to
c;+
-
III
Il.:..::..
_n
~.
-
1 "oJ l .... 9~1 C';o i)1rn1f I~~'
":8.1/ l.l I.. -,.:J ~~
... - .
rb
<.j
3
~-
c"\J
d
.,
~
9-
,
~
I
-~ti:.~~'~
._....,~;<;..~:JP.t~'. .~..
~. ~- ....~.J_-.f'.. .. k. "" .
_. a. .,..... f',
~: ,.", ~"".. . '"*'
"'...~ '-
.
f.: . 'l"
~ -.
, .
, .
~~~ ~~#~~
Q
j
~
J
c.i
f
~
.~
1
"1
j
-.
"".
,
-
,....._..,J,~..
" f"-.r, .',.. ':."~ ....-
.<.~
. ...
. '.
~,~
-
..,
...-
- .
;
~..
#
"
~
"llt:~.e~- -
...., .....
. '101.
~,; ~.
1I1J"""'~'" .......~.
"" ~ .: ~
",- ~~.r_" "-:-'
~",.. '~"':.,/<:-~
-1
J
~
J
~
~
<-'
(j
<:v
Ct
r
'('--
~
-d
, /"I
VJ
.-+
U)
<::5
'D
~.., :-
,'.
\.f'~~-
-
e'
.
. -
~.. ... ......
:";,Il~:.,
"" ' "" -.. _ 4:'-
. .. ....... ..."
-4... r
-.. .~..:.
--~
.t<_
.-
.., _4
.....
..~
{:;:"':".,.
~-~
.'
,
,
."
.....
-
.'
"
,... ..".,...
,
"" ...
.t.:-. ..
..........'-':- ~
~
..
..
.
..
-
:... ,,<' .
",-.."'" .:.:
~... Y",
.., ~.,.......
:>.
1;';';;
"~ ..
...... .
. .
, .
. '
1.:,:/'.
~
..:.
,.
, .
..
-
-
_:""
..~
,..
:,---
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF LINO LAKES
AND THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE
REGARDING 21 ST AVENUE ROADWAY,
PHASEL~ROVEMENTSAND
MAINTENANCE
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on the day and year hereinafter set
forth by and between the City of Lino Lakes and the City of Centerville; both of which
are governmental subdivisions of the State of Minnesota located in the County of Anoka.
RECITALS
a. The City of Lino Lakes and the City of Centerville desire to improve 21 st
Avenue by constructing street, curb and gutter and storm sewer from Main Street to the
south. ~ [uLLjI.-tc.fD S-1J7-L.H- OQ ?(c,(--. -tblf (lVOcSe&t--
b. The City of Lino Lakes has prepared a feasibility study of the Project as
defined by this agreement.
c. A portion of the Project is to be constructed within the corporate limits of
the City of Lino Lakes and a portion is to be constructed within the corporate limits of the
City of Centerville. (Exhibit A).
d. Subject to the terms hereof, Lino Lakes is assuming full responsibility for
the design and construction of the Project to be built both within the corporate limits of
Lino Lakes and Centerville.
e. Lino Lakes and Centerville recognize and acknowledge that the Project
will benefit both Lino Lakes and Centerville.
1
1-
f. Lino Lakes and Centerville will both assess the benefited properties within
their jurisdictions for all, or a portion of the relevant costs of the Project, all as is more
fully set forth below.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms of the agreement Lino
Lakes and Centerville have reached regarding the design and construction, maintenance
and financing of the Project both within the corporate limits of Lino. Lakes and
Centerville, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings herein
expressed, Lino Lakes and Centerville agree as follows:
I. Lino Lakes is responsible for the design and construction of both the
portion of the Project located within Lino Lakes and the portion of the Project located
within Centerville. Therefore, the parties agree that:
a. Lino Lakes shall design the Project, administer the construction and
conduct inspections of the construction process. Centerville shall have the right to
inspect, review and comment upon construction of the Project. Centerville shall have the
right to review and approve the final plans and specifications prior to advertisement for
bids.
b. For purposes of performing its obligations under this Agreement,
Centerville hereby grants to Lino Lakes the rights to use the streets, public ways, and
easements of Centerville for purposes of constructing the Project, including any
excavations necessary to perform work incidental to the performance of this agreement;
2
and Centerville hereby agrees, through its departmental agencies, to cooperate to the
fullest extent in the protection of any excavations or barricades that may be necessary for
the work performed by Lino Lakes.
c. Lino Lakes agrees to notify and coordinate with businesses in Lots 7, 8
and 9 of the CentervilIe Industrial Park (along the existing gravel segment of 21 sl
Avenue) as early as practical the construction schedule of the Project.
2. Construction costs and design engineering shall be divided proportionally,
50% to Lino Lakes and 50% to Centerville, for the Project. Legal, administrative and
construction engineering costs shall be paid separately by each City.
3. Each city has the right to terminate Agreement prior to award of
construction contract.
4. Each municipality shall be solely responsibly for their share of the costs of
the Project. Each municipality shall be responsible for the sale of bonds, if any, and levy
of special assessments against properties within their cities boundaries.
5. City of Lino Lakes shall receive, from the City of Centerville, monthly
payments, as certain portions of the construction are completed. The Project amounts are
then due and payable for work completed. Upon completion of the entire Project, the
City of Lino Lakes shall prepare a final cost statement and submit it to the City of
CentervilIe. Payment of the statement shall be completed within 45 days upon receipt of
the statement.
6. Before this Agreement shall become binding and effective it shall be
approved by an appropriate resolution of the City Council of Lino Lakes and of the City
Council of CentervilIe, which shall be attached hereto as Exhibits B and C, respectively.
3
7. The City of Lino Lakes shall maintain 21 sl A venue by performing annual
street sweeping, crack sealing and pothole filling. The City of Centerville shall maintain
21 st Avenue by plowing snow and winter sanding/de-icing.
8. The City of Lino Lakes and the City of Centerville will sealcoat the
roadway on a 5-7 year interval by separate cost share agreement.
9. Other projects, such as reconstruction and overlays, shall be completed by
separate agreement between the City of Lino Lakes and the City of
Centerville.
10. The City of Lino Lakes shall maintain the stonn sewer consisting of
perfonning periodic inspections of the conveyance system/pond and by
taking any necessary corrective action, all by a separate cost share
agreement.
4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lino Lakes and Centerville have caused this Agreement to be
executed on behalf of the proper officers.
Dated:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
Mayor
City Clerk
Dated:
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Mayor
City Clerk
5
.
'Esta6[islied 18S7
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
September 16, 2002
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Kim Moore-Sykes, City Administrator fWb
Tri-City Meeting at Hugo on September 12, 2002
FROM:
RE:
............................................................................
This second Tri-City meeting was very informative and productive, although the group
agreed to table the question of sharing water production (number 4. on the meeting
agenda) at Mayor Miron's request. He suggested that it should be rescheduled to the next
meeting due to the extensive discussion that had been going on regarding the CSAH
8/ll4lmprovement Project and the I35E/CSAH 14 Interchange.
Several of the area's political representatives were also in attendance. Kennedy,
Vanderveer, Krentz, Bachmann, Holston and others that I did not know were there mostly
for the discussions regarding the widening of 14 and the interchange. Lynn Bly, State of
Minnesota, discussed some of the benefits of moving the interchange to the south. She
also stated that there will be a meeting Sept. 17 from 4:30 to 7:00 at the Century Junior
High School in Forest Lake.
Glen Van Wormer, SEH and formally from MnDOT, discussed the 1995 transportation
study that was commissioned by the I35E Corridor Coalition. The Coalition included
White Bear Lake, White Bear Township, Vadnais Heights, Gem Lake, North Oaks,
Ramsey County, Met Council, and MnDOT. Mr. Van Wormer indicated that these cities
were experiencing a similar situation as Centerville, Hugo and Lino Lakes with increased
traffic and increasing growth. He reported that they looked at the relationship between
land use and transportation and worked towards balancing them. He indicated that
coordination between the interested parties was critical to the success of their project and
part of this coordination was the agreement each made to keep land use planning
activities to what was stated in each comprehensive land use plan. He kept reiterating
that it is important to find a balance between land development and roadway capacity and
with good, sound plans, he felt the group had the strength to meet and overcome legal
challenges from developers. This same cohesiveness is just as important when
approaching the State or Federal governments for funding. Kennedy and Vandeveer
repeated this idea as well; they both said that regional planning gets more attention from
funding sources that a broader coalition is more likely to succeed in getting financial
support for a regional project that benefits more people.
The group discussed the need for a coalition and asked each member to take it back to
their City Council for a decision about their willingness to participate as a coalition
similar to the I35E Coalition. Most of the Council representatives there seemed to be in
favor of this idea.
Len Pratt, developer for Victor Gardens was there and presented an update on that
project. He is hoping to be able to have an open house and tours for anyone that is
interested.
1-
. '.
AGENDA
SPECIAL TRI-CITY MEETING
CITY COUNCILS OF HUGO, LINO LAKES, AND CENTERVILLE
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2002 -7:00 PM
ONEKA ROOM -HUGO CITY HALL
7:00 pm I).' Introductions and Welcome - Mayor Fran Miron
I
7:05 pm \12. CSAH 8/14 Improvement Project
. Chris Manthey, Washington County
7:25 pm ,~ 1-35E and CSAH 14 Interchange
. Stop Signs
. Formation of Coalition - Glen Van Wormer
SED Senior Transportation Engr.
8:15 pm 4. City Sharing of Water Production - r~
8:30 pm (~" Elmcrest A venue Improvements
9:00 pm ~ New Business
9:30 pm
7.
Adjournment
.
I WHA T IS THE BACKGROUND AND WHO IS INVOL VED IN THE PROJECT? I
./ Washington County, Anoka County, Lino Lakes And Hugo identified the need for
improvements on CSAH 8/14 between 1-35 and TH 61.
./ Federal was funding received for the year 2004.
./ The CSAH 8/14 project management team is made up of representatives of both
counties and both cities. The objective of the team is to approach the project with no
predetermined outcomes, keep everyone informed, and obtain input from any concerned
citizens, groups, and agencies to help in the decision process.
WHY IS THIS PROJECT NEEDED?
I
Traffic ODerations
./ This roadway is classified as a Minor Arterial. Its primary function is to provide regional
mobility. Development in the surrounding communities is placing a higher on the regional
road system. Through traffic from Forest Lake, New Scandia Township, May Township,
and western Wisconsin use CSAH 8/14 for access to the interstate system.
./ Traffic volumes on CSAH 8/14 more than doubled on segments of the road since 1992
and are projected to increase again by 2 to 3 times within the next 20 years.
Engineering studies show that 2-lane roadways begin to experience unacceptable
operations at 10,000 to 12,000 vehicles per day in developing areas, depending on
access conditions.
. Existing traffic volumes - 11,000 to 16,400 ADT
. 20 Year Projected Traffic Volume - 22,000 to 32,000 ADT
./ People living adjacent to the roadway in Hugo and Lino Lakes have reported that
problems such as passing on the shoulder, cars traveling over the speed limit, people
having difficulty getting onto the main road from City streets and driveway are there and
are continuing to increase.
Roadwav Condition
./ Bituminous roadways are designed for a service life of 35 years. This roadway was
constructed 35 years ago and received an overlay 7-10 years ago. It is reaching the end
of its useful life.
Pedestrian Safety
./ There are no bicycle or pedestrian paths along the roadway except the sidewalks in front
of the residential properties near TH 61. People are unable to use the road for walking or
biking.
WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS?
,
./ Based on existing and projected traffic volumes, the proposed improvements
include reconstruction of the roadway with four through lanes, tum lanes, a
center median, pedestrian/bicycle path, and new drainage systems
(culverts/storm sewer.)
./ A transition section will be constructed between the 1-35 E east ramp and Otter
lake Road.
./ The project received $3.6 million in Federal funding. Washington County,
Anoka County, Hugo, and Lino lakes will provide the remaining funding.
./ The goal of the project is to provide a safe and efficient roadway that meets current and
future traffic needs, while minimizing social, environmental, and economic impacts.
WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO DATE?
I
if The process includes a technical analysis side and a public involvement side to be done
concurrently to meet the project objectives.
if Three public informational meetings have been held to date.
if Four alignment alternatives were chosen to be evaluated as a result of the first public
meeting, 140th Street Alignment, 142nd Street Alignment, 145th Street Alignment (existing)
and 147th Street Alignment.
if The 140th Street alignment was eliminated from further study because of environmental
impacts, right-of-way and construction costs, and travel patterns.
if The 142nd Street, 145th Street, and 147th Street alignments are moving forward for further
analysis in an Environmental Assessment (EA).
ADD GENERAL ALIGNMENT AL TERNA T1VES MAP
WHAT'S NEXT?
I
v' A combined federal and state EA, with a more in-depth study of the three alternatives, is
being prepared.
v' Upon completion, the EA will be distributed for public review and comment.
v' A combined public information meeting/public hearing will be held in January 2003 to
present the final information and obtain comments.
v' Shortly after that meeting, the preferred alternative will be selected and move forward for
detail design.
v' Construction will most likely begin in Spring 2004 and be completed in 2005.
ADD "WHA T IS THE PROCESS" CHART
R:\200802IPublic MeetingslTR-CITY MTG 09-12.{)2.doc
RESOLUTION 2002-12
JOINT RESOLUTION OF PRINCIPAL MUNICIPALITIES
AFFECTED BY CSAH 14/I-35E INTERCHANGE
WHEREAS, the undersigned cities ofLino Lakes, Hugo and Centerville (hereinafter
"The Cities") are municipalities which lie adjacent to or near the intersection of CSAH 1411nd
Interstate 35E (hereinafter "the Interchange"); and,
WHEREAS, the Interchange serves as the principal freeway access for commercial,
residential, and permanently Tural areas within The Cities; for example, growing industrial parks
within the City of Hugo and Lino Lakes are served by vehicle and truck traffic from the
imerchange and residents of all The Cities use the Interchange for access to urban and rural
residential housing in all directions; and, .- -
WHEREAS, as presently configured, the intersection consists offour (4) narrow
exit/entrance lanes off ofI-35E which serve CSAH 14; and,
WHEREAS, CSAH 14 will soon be expanded and updated to accommodate increaSing
traffic from the east and west; and,
WHEREAS, it is apparent to The Cities that there is a real and immediate need to
upgrade and improve the Interchange to protect public health, safety and welfare. Among other
problems, the Interchange has sight distance deficiencies, and its narrowness creates traffic
congestion on the easterly and westerly approaches to the Interchange on CSAH 14,38 well as
creating congestion on 1-35E; and,
WHEREAS, The Cities are expecting to continue to experience substantial growth which
will worsen the traffic conditions present at the Interchange and which will be sufficient to cause
additional congestion on 1-35E; and,
WHEREAS, The Cities are aware that the Minnesota Department of Transportation has
considered the CSAH 14/I-35E project as a potential candidate for improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby mutually resolved as follows:
1. Each of The Cities has observed that the Interchange's current condition and
configuration is insufficient to safely accommodate existing and expected traffic at and around
the intersection, and will continue to create congestion and safety problems.
2. The Cities respectfully request that the Minnesota Department of Transportation
accelerate, however possible, its consideration of improvements to the Interchange and endeavor
to give the Interchange high priority for recOnstruction.
3. . Each of The Cities; to the extent reasonably possible, pledges ;towork closely
with each other, the MiinieS6ta Department of Transportation; and any other regulatory; .
.-"-'.
administrative or governmental body, to accomplish improvements to the'lnterchange at
the earliest possible time. .
WHEREUPON, said Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted by
the City Councils for the City of Hugo on April!. 2002. the City of Centerville on
~ .;{ f ,2002, and the City ofLino Lakes on 4-Ao ( ..11...:2,' ~<0,;);
CITY OF HUGO
. ~'
B~ ,-
Michael A. Ericson, Its City Administrator
CITY OF UNO LAKES
By Jo~Yor
By~_jA.)~.h o/-'~
inda Waite Smith, Its City Administrator
CITY OF CENTERVIILLE
JOINT COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY 30, 2002
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
DATE
TIME STARTED
TIME ENDED
MEMBERS PRESENT
: January 30, 2002
. 7:05 p.m.
: 9:10 p.m.
: Council Members Carlson, Dahl,
O'Donnell, Reinert, and Mayor Bergeson
: None
MEMBERS ABSENT
Staff members present: City Administrator, Linda Waite Smith; Community
Development Director, Rick DeGardner; Community Development Director, Michael
Grochala; and Chief of Police, Dave Pecchia
Representatives from the City of Centerville present: City Administrator, Kim Moore-
Sykes; Councilmemb,er Mary Capra; Councilmember Mari Nelson; Councilmember
Linda Broussard-Vickers; and Mayor Tim Swedberg
Representatives from the City of Hugo present: City Administrator, Mike Ericson;
Councilmember Frank Puleo; Councilmember Mike Granger; Councilmember Chuck
Haas; and Mayor Fran Miron
Other Representatives present: State of Minnesota Staff, Lynne Bly; State of Minnesota
. Staff, Rick Arnebeck; State Senator, Jane Krentz; and State Representative, Ray
Vandeveer
Mayor Bergeson welcomed everyone to the meeting while everyone present introduced.
himself or herself as the meeting agenda was distributed.
CSAH 14fI-3SE INTERCHANGE. RICKARNEBECK
City Administrator Ericson noted a copy of a newspaper article regarding County Road 8
was included in everyone's packet.
Mr. Rick Arnebeck, MnDDT, explained the funding process, noting a ranking system is
used for priorities. The objectives in determining priorities include: Preserving the
infrastructure as is; Managing the roadway by adding turn lanes; Improving the roadway;
Expanding the roadway; Later regional quarters; and Bottling. He indicated that anytime
an upgrade of an interchange is to occur it becomes a higher priority than expansion of a
roadway. However, interchanges also have a higher priority. He indicated County Road
.JOINT COUNCIL MEETING
.JANUARY 30, 2002
14 / County Road 8 is on the trunk highway system in terms of priority although 1-35 is a
high priority.
Mr. Arnebeck stated the problem with the interchange is that it is causing congestion on
the freeway. MnDOT also has to look at the future in terms of County Road 4 and
Highway 97. Development in the area will also cause additional problems. There are
options that can be explored to relieve congestion at both interchanges.
Mr. Arnebeck advised the problem with funding from MnDOT is that funds are
committed at least four (4) years out so plans for the future need to be made as soon as
possible. He noted there is a fund to help financially secure right-of-ways for future
needs. MnDOT does not have control over the interstate. Funding for projects does
come from federal and state agencies.
Ms. Lynne Bly, State of Minnesota Staff, stated there has been some thinlringthat 1-35
needs its own regional corridor but that is not part of the current planning process.
Mr. Arnebeck noted there is a plan to put up temporary lights at Hwy. 97, which often can
cause additional traffic problems.
Councilmember HaaS inquired about the possibility of clover leafing the interchange.
Mr. Arnebeck stated the cost of that is approximately $250,000 - 300,000 per leg. It is
possible if the right-of-way is available. Rating was done on the interchanges and this
particular interchange rates 51-110. There are about 50 more interchanges that are more
dangerous or congested than this one.
Councilmember Nelson suggested expanding the freeway for more room or moving the
ramps back.
Mr. Arnebeck stated cost-wise, that would not be beneficial.
Counci1member Capra suggested leaving the on ramps in place but shifting the off ramps
to another roadway.
Mr. Arnebeck stated that option would reduce the costs of the project considerably.
Senator Krentz stated there is a window of opportunity that also needs to be considered as
well as the matter of funding and fairness. She stated the north metro has not received its
fair share of funding. The corridor is obviously growing and needs improvements.
Ms. Bly stated the starting place for the project is the communities coming together to do
some planning. That will tell MnDOT where the need is and possible solutions.
2
JOINT COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY 30, 2002
Mr. Amebeck stated the communities and counties have to come together and develop a
plan for the future. When improvements are done in an expansion area, MnDOT does
look to share the costs with the community. Funding is an issue at this time. The
interchange may be eligible for federal funds. However, federal funds do go into the
MnDOT budget. MnDOT does not order the studies for projects. The cities and/or
County should initiate the study. A consultant can be hired if the cities' staffs can prepare
the studies.
Councilmember Reinert clarified that the Councils should look at the zoning of available
right-of-way while Staff is preparing studies to work with the County to request plans
from MnDOT
Mr. Amebeck stated the first thing to do is set up a meeting with the involved cities
planning staff, MnDOT planning staff and the counties' (Anoka and Washington)
planning staff. From there an assessment can be done regarding how much of a study
will be needed. Facts and data are needed and then a recommendation can be made to
'each City Council.
Councilmember Haas stated it seems that if there is a collaborative effort the project may
be moved up on the priority list. The City Councils need to identifY the land and set it
aside for future plarnilng.
Mr. Ray Vandaveer, State Representative, noted there is also a fund that may reimburse
communities for a portion of the project that is done.
City Administrator Waite Smith inquired about the reimbursement program and asked if
you know about reimbursement before the project is done.
Mr. Arnebeck stated there is strong competition for the reimbursement program and the
city is taking its chances on reimbursement if the project is not planned for ahead of time.
He stated that MnDOT can quickly look at safety issues and other issues once the study is
completed. Those issues will determine how high priority the project is.
Mayor Swedberg stated Anoka County just completed a traffic study of the interchange
and asked ifMnDOT will accept that He also asked if it is appropriate to have a letter
from all the agencies involved showing support for the project.
Mr. Arnebeck stated MnDOT will accept the plan that was just completed by the County.
He stated a resolution from all the cities and counties indicating there is a problem and
the agencies will work together would be very helpful.
It was the consensus of the Councilmembers present to approve a resolution showing
support for the project and forwarding that to MnDOT.
3
. JOINT COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY 30, 2002
Councilmember Capra suggested the City Administrators meet to review each city's
Comprehensive Plan to see how they fit together in terms of this project.
Mayor Miron stated Hugo's staff can draft and prepare the resolution and forward it to the
other cities. The resolution should also be sent to neighboring commnnities such as
White Bear Lake, White Bear Township and Forest Lake to get their support also.
Ms. Bly stated it is very important that a planning analysis cover more than just the three
(3) commnnities of Hugo, Centervi1le, and Lino Lakes.
Councilmember Capra suggested Columbus Township be included also.
Councilmember Broussard-Vickers stated she is concerned that the County's plans for the
roadway may be different than the City of Centerville's plan.
Mr. Arnebeck stated the project will become a higher priority if all the involved entities
are in support of the project.
Mayor Miron stated the resolution will only initiate the discussions and not include
design plans.
Mayor Bergeson asked if the resolution should address only Hwy. 14 or the entire
corridor.
Ms. Bly stated the bigger picture is needed and MnDOT needs to know what will happen
elsewhere and what problems are occurring in the entire conidor.
Mr. Arnebeck stated the larger picture is needed but it is key to focus on the root of the
problem. He noted that MnDOT could spend all the available funding on metro roads
alone but MnDOT does set some funds aside for outside of the metro. There are currently
approximately five (5) projects within the northeast metro out of a list of 25.
Mayor Bergeson called for a short break at 8: 15 p.m.
Mayor Bergeson reconvened the meeting at 8:25 p.m.
PUBLIC WORKS MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT. KIM MOORE-SYKES
Councilmember Moore-Sykes stated the City of Centerville approved the Public Works
Mutual Aid Agreement last week. She distributed a copy of the agreement noting the
City has worked on it for two (2) years.
City Administrator Waite Smith noted the City ofLino Lakes and Hugo previously
approved the agreement. .
4
JOINT COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY 30, 2002
YMCA UPDATE, JEFF O'DONNELL
Councilmember O'Donnell distributed a brochure regarding the Chair ofLakes YMCA
noting he is a volunteer on the Board. He stated the YMCA is currently working on
progr>lmm;ng and asked that each City contact the YMCA regarding any possible
opportunities for the connnunity.
Councilmember O'Donnell continued noting that the approximately $6.5 million is the
fundraising goal and the YMCA is currently a bit over $5 million. The YMCA is very
excited about that but there is still $1.5 million to go. Representatives from the YMCA
may be contacting city staff to help pursue the project.
TRAIL CONNECTION BETWEEN HUGO AND LINO LAKES, MIKE ERICSON
City Administrator Ericson advised at one time there was a proposed trail between the
City ofLino Lakes and Hugo.
Mayor Miron gave the history of the proposed trail noting a funding grant was applied
for. There were some residents and the previous mayor that were opposed to the trail.
Since then, development is beginning to occur and the cities may now have the
opportunity to develop the trail.
City Administrator Ericson distributed a map pointing out the location of the proposed
trail. He referred to a plan for the Victor Gardens subdivision noting the trails in that
subdivision will go out to the border ofLino Lakes. The City of Hugo would like to
connect those trails with the development in Lino Lakes.
Mayor Swedberg stated this issue bas been discussed many times before and he believes
obtaining a grant may still be poSSIble. He indicated he thinks a trail connection would be
a very good idea.
Councilmember Granger stated the cities need to show how a trail will go over the
freeway. He indicated there are funding options out there to help with the cost of the
trail.
Public Services Director DeGardner stated Lino Lakes does have a designated trail
corridor in the Clearwater Creek development. It was anticipated that it would connect to
Victor Gardens at some point in the future. He stated he believes that the best time to
look at a freeway crossing is when the bridge is reconstructed.
Mayor Bergeson asked if the trail concept should be included in the resolution relating to
CSAH 14.
Public Services Director DeGardner stated the trail crossing has been identified in
discussions with the County and MnDOT.
5
JOINT COUNCIL MEETING.
JANUARY 30,2002
Mayor Miron stated Staff will make copies of the previous proposal and distribute to each
Council for review and comments. This issue should be discussed further at a future joint
meeting.
Public Services Director DeGardner added it would be very easy to extend that trail to the
freeway if funds become available.
It was the consensus Councihnembers to include a potential trail in the resolution that
will be drafted in relating to CSAH 14.
A resident of Lino Lakes stated that getting across the interstate on CSAH 14 is not the
only problem because of the ramps. .He suggested building a pedestrian ramp at Cedar.
Mayor Miron stated Staff will be sensitive to that issue when drafting the resolution.
OTHER BUSINESS
Mayor Bergeson stated the City Administrators can discuss meeting dates for future
meetings.
Mayor Swedberg stated water is a big issue because the community is growing.
Additional space for water storage is needed and each City does not need to build
separate water towers. He suggested a that a joint water system could be very beneficial
to the cities. Wherever the cities can find cooperative opportunities to save money the
cities should pursue it.
Mayor Miron stated that Victor Gardens is getting their water from Lino Lakes. Both
cities are working cooperatively and other opportunities will present themselves. He
stated another issue that should be addressed is the border road Elmcrest north ofHwy.
14. He stated he does not know what Lino Lakes' intention is with that roadway and there
have been quality issues in the past. This item should also be discussed at a future
meeting.
Mayor Bergeson stated he has seem some plans for that roadway including a concept plan
for a possible north/south roadway in that area.
Councilmember Graoger stated that Elmcrest to the south and issues with Clearwater
Creek should also be discussed.
Mayor Bergeson asked if the City of Hugo uses the County for their police protection and
if Hugo bas long range plans for water service.
Mayor Miron stated Hugo does use the County for police service and also for road
maintenance. The City plans on developing a more intense public works department. He
6
JOINT COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY 30,.2002
noted the two (2) year moratorium on development is going to expire soon. The
development that is proposed to the north fits into the City's current water system. A
tower is being constrocted so the City is planning for future water needs.
Mayor Miron stated Hugo is open to hosting the next meeting at their new facility.
Invitations to the open house will be sent to both Lino Lakes and CenterviIle. He asked
when the next joint meeting should be held.
It was the cOnsensus of the CounciImembers present that after the resolution is drafted
and approved by each Council another joint meeting will be held. The time frame for that
meeting is approximately 3-6 months.
Mayor Swedberg noted that the neighboring communities previously mentioned,
including Vadnais Heights and the Metropolitan Council, also need to be sent the
resolution indicating a cooperative effort relating to CSAH 14.
There being no further business to discuss regarding this issue, the meeting was
adjoumed at 9:10p.m.
These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on
February 11, 2002. .
Ann Blair, City Clerk
John Bergeson, Mayor
Transcribed by:
Kim Points
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
7
WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 8
ANOKA COUNTY STA TE AID HIGHWA Y 14
,~,"o. fl_rt
HO~OE
I
2
LIND
LAKES
:z
=>
IHSI.N_
170TH ST. ro.
4
i
.
~
15:mtSf."
'~51>t sr. ..
~.
-'
-'
WHA T IS THE BACKGROUND AND WHO IS INVOL VED IN THE PROJECT? I
./ Washington County, Anoka County, Lino Lakes And Hugo identified the need for
improvements on CSAH 8/14 between 1-35 and TH 61.
./ Federal was funding received for the year 2004.
./ The CSAH 8/14 project management team is made up of representatives of both
counties and both cities. The objective of the team is to approach the project with no
predetermined outcomes, keep everyone informed, and obtain input from any concerned
citizens, groups, and agencies to help in the decision process.
WHY IS THIS PROJECT NEEDED?
I
Traffic Operations
./ This roadway is classified as a Minor Arterial. Its primary function is to distribute traffic
from local collectors to the interstate system and provide regional mobility. Development
in the surrounding communities is placing a higher need on the regional road system.
Through traffic from Forest Lake, New Scandia Township, May Township, and western
Wisconsin also use CSAH 8/14 for access to the interstate system.- :r;,c,,,,,, Sz.d -tv"'" r:-k~ Vc' ~ll"
./ Traffic volumes on CSAH 8/14 more than doubled on segments of the road since 1992
and are projected to increase again by 2 to 3 times within the next 20 years.
Engineering studies show that 2-lane roadways begin to experience unacceptable
operations at 10,000 to 12,000 vehicles per day in developing areas, depending on
access conditions.
. Existing Traffic Volume - 11,000 to 16,400 Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
. 20 Year Projected Traffic Volume - approximately 32,000 ADT
./ People living adjacent to the roadway in Hugo and Lino Lakes have reported that
problems such as passing on the shoulder, cars traveling over the speed limit, people
having difficulty getting onto the main road from City streets and driveway are there and
are continuing to increase. IJC""'''-iO,,>;A ('/)i,-t'4:,(..,,--,~;J.'z, vk".k0-fvi'-5 r?,rc,d-o.&;,vn!"-
o Lo/(/~~;' -i?pdJc~ru~:A~-e.:, {;"~A'- r- JL{_~- c;(_~-(!_,'e-:..C.-;j(""~'
; ~~,1 ,~ 1.'" Ij..' _~_'"' '"'" - /
t-.JLi ':.,.-.((~Jil.l:...c._...k-s /--tt {_,...r..X _"
Roadwav Condition
./ Bituminous roadways are designed for a service life of 35 years. This roadway was
constructed 35 years ago and received an overlay 7-10 years ago. It is reaching the end
of its useful life.
Pedestrian Safety
./ There are no bicycle or pedestrian paths along the roadway except the sidewalks in front
of the residential properties near TH 61. People are unable to use the road for walking or
biking.
WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS?
I
'" Based on existing and projected traffic volumes, the proposed improvements
include reconstruction ofthe roadway with four through lanes, turn lanes, a
center median, pedestrian/bicycle path, and new drainage systems
(culverts/storm sewer.)
'" A transition section will be constructed between the 1-35 E east ramp and Otter
Lake Road.
'" The project received $3.6 million in Federal funding. Washington County,
Anoka County, Hugo, and Lino Lakes will provide the remaining funding.
'" The goal of the project is to provide a safe and efficient roadway that meets current and
future traffic needs, while minimizing social, environmental, and economic impacts.
WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO DATE?
I
./' The process includes a technical analysis side and a public involvement side to be done
concurrently to meet the project objectives.
./' Three public informational meetings have been held to date.. (/-.;,... Lt-d- \ftLV )
./' Four alignment alternatives were chosen to be evaluated as a result of the first public
meeting, 140111 Street Alignment, 142nd Street Alignment, 1451h Street Alignment (existing)
and 14th Street Alignment.
./' The 140lh Street alignment was eliminated from further study because of environmental
""7 impacts, right-of-way and construction costs, and travel patterns.
./' The 142nd Street, 145th Street, and 147th Street alignments are moving forward for further
analysis in an Environmental Assessment (EA).
J5E
z ~
w
>
<
~
w
" z
u
3 ~
<
~
"
~
11 8 RENCi"li.:'..J
<
'e,
'",
LINO
LAKES
. !
CENTERVILLE!
...~ER !
!
r~= '''''" "
I
~
"
,
;
u
HUGO
21
j
,
<
!
.,
J
'JOn,
s,. "
GENERAL ALIGNMENT ALTERNATIVES
WHAT'S NEXT?
I
.(' A combined federal and state EA, with a more in-depth study of the three alternatives, is
being prepared.
.(' Upon completion, the EA will be distributed for public review and comment.
.(' A combined public information meeting/public hearing will be held in January 2003 to
present the final information and obtain comments.
.(' Shortly after that meeting, the preferred alternative will be selected and move forward for
detail design. ( &Ctc";'~"'-~i-vY~ Co t l-fiA'!jJ C-V{ ,~....;~ t..:-v)
~r~/X.dL.e>J
.(' Construction will most likely begin in Spring 2004 and be completed in 2005.
NO
PREDETERMINED
OUTCOMES
STUDY ISSUES
Propertylmpacls
Wetlands
FloodPlain
Water Qua!ity
Stormwater Ponding
Noise
Land Use
Property Acquislion
Tfilils
Palkarn:lRide
CulluralResourms
PUBLIC
INFORMATION
MEETING
January 2002
TKDA
COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 8/14 IMPROVEMENTS
1-35 to Highway 61
WHAT IS THE PROCESS?
STUDY PHASE
DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
ANALYZE PHASE PHASE
ALIGNMENT
AL TERNA TIVES
SELECT
PREFERRED DETAIL f--> CONSTRUCTION
ALIGNMENT --., DESIGN
ALTERNATIVE
February 2003* February2OJ3 Aprll 2004 to ear1y200S
'"
ENVIRONMENTAL December 2003
STUDY
PROCESS TO EVAlUATE
THE SOCIAL,
ENVIRONMENTAL, AND
ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF
THE AL TERNATlVES
February 2002 to Januay 2003
PUBLIC
INFORMATION
MEETING
April 2002
*
July 2003
PUBLIC
INFORMATION
MEETING
PUBLIC
INFORMATION
MEETING
June 2002
*Dates are tentative
8Ja lif~~go ~*is
August 2002
COUNTY STATE AID mGHWAY 8/14
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES
Washington County, Anoka County, the Cities of Hugo and Lino Lakes, along with their
consultant TKDA, are conducting a study of the County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 8/14
corridor between Interstate 35E (I-35E) and Trunk Highway 61 (TH 61).
Four alignment alternatives are being analyzed in the project's preliminary design phase:
140.h Street Alignment: Realigning CSAH 8 to connect with TH 61 at l40.h Street
142nd Street Alignment: Realigning CSAH 8 to connect with TH 61 between l40th Street
and existing CSAH 8
14S.h Street Alignment (Existing): Maintaining the CSAH 8 alignment along its existing
location
147'b Street Alignment: Realigning CSAH 8 to connect with TH 61 at l47th StreetlOneka
Lake Boulevard
The four alternative alignments each have pros and cons, which are being analyzed. This
analysis includes an evaluation of the social, environmental, and economic impacts of each
alternative. Based on the analysis done to date, it has been determined that the l40.h Street
alignment will be eliminated. Environmental impacts, right-of-way and construction costs, and
travel patterns are the main reasons for eliminating the alternative. The remaining three
alternatives will continue to be analyzed.
The following are the most frequently asked questions on the CSAH 8/14
project:
Why is this study being done?
Washington and Anoka Counties are experiencing a high growth rate, which impacts existing
roads and utilities. The development in Hugo, Lino Lakes, and surrounding communities is
placing a higher demand on the regional road system. Traffic volumes have more than doubled
on many roads in both counties in the last ten years. Traffic volumes are expected to increase on
County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 8/14 by two to three times within the next 20 years. Along
with increasing traffic can come unsafe and inefficient traffic operations, including passing on
the shoulder, cars traveling over the speed limit, people having difficulty getting onto the main
road from city streets and driveways, traffic congestion, and people unable to use the road for
walking or biking. People who live on CSAH 8/14 in Hugo and Lino Lakes have reported these
types of problems and that they continue to increase. It is the responsibility of the Cities and
Counties to address these problems. That is why we are involved in a thorough and
comprehensive process, which includes concurrent technical analysis and public involvement.
CSAH 8/14 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES - Updated July 2002
-1-
What will be used to evaluate the four alternative aliguments?
In the alternatives analysis phase, or information gathering stage, many items will be looked at
including investi*ating potential impacts to wetlands and floodplains, the Lion's park, the
cemetery on 147 Street, important historical or archaeological resources in the community,
endangered or threatened species, minority or low income residents, and effects of the project on
neighborhoods and businesses. Property impacts, including residential and business relocations
and property acquisition, will be evaluated. Land use and transportation issues include
consistency with existing and future land use, residential and street accesses, travel patterns,
traffic operations and level of service, and safety and efficiency of the proposed route. The goal
of the alternatives analysis is to balance all of these factors and provide the safest, most efficient
roadway possible.
The public involvement process includes meetings in the community, newsletters, websites, and
contact with the County and City project representatives by phone, letter, or e-mail. The project
team relies on input from residents to make sure important items are not overlooked. For
example, the study area was expanded as a direct result of comments made at the first public
meeting. Over 50 written comments have been received to date, which include comments for
and against all four alternative alignments.
When will the fmal decision on the highway alignment be made and how are the
communities involved in the decision?
The alternatives analysis phase was completed in June. The information was presented to the
Lino Lakes and Hugo City Councils in July. They concurred that the 142nd Street, 145th Street,
and 147th StreetlOneka Lake Boulevard alignments move forward for further study. A combined
Federal and State Environmental Assessment (EA), which is a more in-depth environmental
study, will be prepared. At the conclusion of the comment period for the EA, in October, a
combined public information meeting/public hearing will be held to present the final information
and obtain comments. Anoka County, Hugo, and Lino Lakes will comment on the alignment
alternatives as part of that process. The Washington County Board of Commissioners will make
the final decision on the location. The Federal Highway Administration must concur with the
decision made by the County Board, since federal funding will be used for the construction.
After the EA is approved and an alignment selected, the roadway design will be completed and
property will be acquired.
Can the speed limit be lowered on CSAH 8/14?
The speed limit on CSAH 8/14 is 30 mph from TH 61 to Y2 mile west, and 55 mph from that
point to the intersection with 1-35. Speed limits in Minnesota are set by the Minnesota
Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) based on engineering and traffic investigations. The
most important part of the traffic investigation is a speed study. When choosing a speed, drivers
take many roadway environmental factors into consideration, so the speed limit that the majority
of people consider prudent is an important criteria. Data is collected by performing radar checks
at selected locations on the roadway, and an analysis is done to determine the 85th percentile.
This is the speed at which most (85%) of the drivers are traveling at or under. Experience has
CSAH 8/14 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES - Updated July 2002
-2 -
shown that a posted speed limit near this value is the maximum safe and reasonable speed.
Studies have shown that traveling much faster or slower can increase the chance of being in a
crash. (Information from Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Traffic
Engineering.)
If a new roadway is constructed, Anoka and Washington Counties will request MnlDOT to
perform a speed study to determine a safe and reasonable speed limit along the corridor. The
speed limit is not expected to change significantly.
People are traveling over the speed limit and passing on the shoulder. Can the roadway be
patrolled more often?
Education and enforcement are needed to eliminate speeding. Speeding is a problem throughout
Washington and Anoka Counties on-every type ofroad.
What will be done to evaluate the potential drainage impacts caused by the project?
A drainage analysis will compare existing conditions with proposed conditions. Water
quality/rate control ponds will be constructed to provide effective water quality treatment prior to
discharge to surface water bodies and to ensure that future peak rates of runoff are less than or
equal to existing rates. Planning measures include coordination with the City of Hugo and with
the Rice Creek Watershed District.
The realignment of CSAH 8/14 will create floodplain and wetland impacts and will affect
Clearwater Creek. What type of environmental permits will be needed to address these
and other environmental impacts?
Environmental impacts along the four alignment alternatives will be evaluated during the study
phase.
Meetings have been held with environmental permitting agencies to obtain input on the project.
Compliance with the Wetland Conservation Act and permits from the US Army Corps of
Engineers and the Rice Creek Watershed District are necessary. We will continue to meet with
these agencies during the project study and design phases.
Residential and commercial properties will be impacted along each alignment. How much
right-of-way will be taken for the road and trail? Will my home or business be acquired
and will I be paid for this?
All four alignment alternatives will involve the acquisition of permanent and temporary
easements. In addition, some residential and business properties may need to be acquired. Each
alternative will include an evaluation of the number of parcels impacted, the potential residential
and business relocations, and the amount of property needed to accommodate the road, path, and
utilities. Compensation will be provided to property owners.
CSAH 8/14 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES - Updated July 2002
- 3-
All property owners affected by the project will be contacted by Washington County's
Acquisition Specialist after the preferred alignment alternative has been selected. An
informational brochure titled "Acquisition Information for Property Owners" is available from
Washington County.
Residents and business owners along CSAH 8 near the intersection with TH 61 and along
CSAH 14 near the intersection with Otter Lake Road experience difficulty accessing the
roadway due to heavy traffic volumes.
Efforts will be taken during the roadway design to ensure safe access to and from CSAH 14 and
CSAH 8 for adjacent property owners. Thealternatives analysis will include an evaluation of
access-related issues including residential and business access, city street access and spacing, and
access spacing on TH 61.
Will traffic signals be installed at the intersection of TH 61 and 147th Street, TH 61 and
140th Street, or CSAH 14 and Otter Lake Road?
A traffic signal will be installed at the intersection ofTH 61 and 140th Street in 2003.
A signal warrant analysis will be completed for the intersection ofCSAH 14 and Otter Lake
Road. If it is determined that a traffic signal is warranted and justified, it will be installed as part
of this project.
If the 147'h Street alignment is chosen as the preferred alternative, a signal warrant analysis will
be completed for the intersection with TH 61, and if determined to be warranted and justified, a
signal at that intersection will also be installed as part of the project.
Are improvements planned for the 1-35E/CSAH 14 interchange, or is a new interchange
planned for CSAH 4 (170th Street) and 1-35?
A major reconstruction project has not been funded or scheduled by the Minnesota Department
of Transportation (MnlDOT) or Anoka County at this time for improvements to the
1- 35E/CSAH 14 interchange. However, interim efforts are being made to determine how to
improve the safety of the interchange. One of the options recommended by Anoka County is the
installation of all-way stop signs. Approval from Mn/DOT is needed for the installation of the
signs. The surrounding communities are working together to look for future opportunities to
build an improved interchange. City Council and staff members from Lino Lakes, Hugo, and
Centerville, along with Mn/DOT staff and local legislators met on January 30,2002. The City
Councils will approve resolutions supporting an interchange reconstruction project. Anoka
County has formally requested that discussions be initiated by Mn/DOT to prioritize and
program the reconstruction of the interchange.
The construction of an interchange at 1-35E and CSAH 4 would need to be initiated by MnlDOT
and is not currently being considered by Mn/DOT. An interchange is not included in Anoka
County's Capital Improvements Program or 2015 Comprehensive Transportation Plan. In
addition, new interchanges must be reviewed and authorized for access by the Federal Highway
CSAH 8/14 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES - Updated July 2002
- 4-
Administration and the Metropolitan Council. New interchanges currently being constructed in
the metropolitan area are being funded by the local agencies.
How wide will the roadway he?
The roadway is proposed to consist of four through lanes (two in each direction) with turn lanes
at intersections and a center median. The exact dimensions will be determined after the preferred
alignment alternative has been selected.
Where will the path be located and how will the project impact the existing recreational
path along Fenway Avenue?
The location of the path will be determined in the study phase. The Cities of Hugo, Lino Lakes,
and Centerville will be involved in determining the location of the path and connections to the
existing and proposed trail systems.
How will the project be funded and will there be any assessments to the property owners?
The project was selected to receive federal funds for construction in 2004, with additional
funding coming from Washington County, Anoka County, Hugo, and Lino Lakes. It has not yet
been determined whether property owners will be assessed.
What are the plans for the expansion ofTH 61?
Traffic is expected to double on TH 61 within the next 20 years. Improvements similar to those
being proposed for CSAH 8/14 will be needed on TH 61. TH 61 is currently under the
jurisdiction ofMnlDOT, but is programmed to be turned back to Washington County in the
future. TH 61 will remain under the jurisdiction of MnlDOT until funding is made available for
the improvements. Funding is not anticipated to be available for roadway improvements until
after 2010. Washington County has met with MnlDOT regarding the CSAH 8/14 project and
discussed the need for upgrading TH 61. The County has requested MnlDOT to initiate the
discussions to transfer the jurisdiction of TH 61 to the County and schedule the appropriate funds
to do so.
Are any improvements planned for 140'h Street or 14th Street east ofTH 61 if one ofthese
alignments were selected?
The City's development plans do not show a need for four lanes east ofTH 61 on l40'h Street or
147'h Street. Intersection modifications are expected as part ofthis project, if one ofthese
alignments is chosen.
CSAH 8/14 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES - Updated July 2002
- 5-
How will the project affect the commercial downtown area and the businesses along
TH 61 ?
Traffic on TH 61 is projected to be over 20,000 vehicles per day regardless of what alignment is
chosen. The existing and future City land use plans, including commercial areas, will be taken
into consideration in the selection of the preferred alignment.
What is the possibility of constructing two 2-lane one-way streets instead of one 4-lane
road?
One-way streets generally work well where there are parallel streets a block or two apart and
where an adequate number of cross streets are available to permit circulation of traffic. For
example, in St. Paul and Minneapolis a grid system of streets has been established, with closely
spaced parallel streets. On CSAH 8, traffic traveling in opposite directions would be separated
by several hundred feet, with cross streets spaced at Y. mile intervals. This system would be
confusing to strangers, so safety would be a concern. Other disadvantages include increased
travel distance, potential cut-through traffic on local streets and the potential problems for
emergency vehicle access.
The majority ofthe traffic comes from the north on TH 61 or from the east on 147'h Street.
Would 147'h Street a better alternative than 140.h Street because ofthis?
Traffic patterns will be one of the criteria used in the selection of the preferred alternative.
Preliminary traffic investigations show that approximately 60% of the traffic is coming from the
north.
What is the future plan for the street system in the City of Hugo?
No matter what alignment is chosen for CSAH 8, the City expects to make city street
connections at l47'h Street and 140th Street to collect and distribute local traffic to the regional
road system.
Will access to my property be needed during the study and design phase?
Access to private property will be necessary to identify archaeological and historic sites,
delineate wetlands, and obtain field surveys.
Permission to enter your property will be requested prior to performing the above-specified
work.
CSAH 8114 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES - Updated July 2002
- 6-
COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 8/14
SUMMARY OF COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM THE PUBLIC AND
RESPONSES TO THE COMMENTS
Washington County, Anoka County, the Cities of Hugo and Lino Lakes, along with their
consultant TKDA, are conducting a study ofthe County State Aid Highway (CSAR) 8/14
corridor between Interstate 35E (I-35E) and Trunk Highway 61 (TH 61).
Four alignment alternatives will be analyzed in the project's preliminary design phase:
140th Street Alignment: Realigning CSAH 8 to connect with TH 61 at l40th Street
l42nd Street Alignment: Realigning CSAH 8 to connect with TH 61 between l40'h Street
and existing CSAH 8
14Sth Street Alignment (Existing): Maintaining the CSAH 8 alignment along its existing
location
147'h Street Alignment: Realigning CSAH 8 to connect with TH 61 at l47'h Street
THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED REGARDING ROADWAY
ALIGNMENT ALTERNATIVES:
. 140th Street Alignment:
The alignment will create floodplain impacts and would require a DNR permit if the
alignment crosses Clearwater Creek.
Traffic will be divertedfrom downtown businesses.
Realigning the roadway to the south doesn't make sense since the majority of the traffic on
CSAH 8 travels north on TH 61.
A roadway along this alignment would intersect a popular recreational path that runs along
Fenway Avenue.
The alignment will impact the residential and commercial developments along 14dh Street.
The 14dh alignment should be constructed because it would provide access to the industrial
park south of 14dh Street.
The 14dh Street alignment is impractical.
The 14dh Street alignment is the most logical choice because the Hugo Fire Hall response
team members will have easy and fast access, the industrial area south of 14dh Street will
have access to the freeway, and there are sidewalks in place in front of the Fire Hall.
CSAH 8/14 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES - Updated July 2002
- 1 -
A tra/!!,c signal is already plannedfor the intersection of 14dh Street and TH 61. If
142" Street or 147lh Street were chosen there would be a need for more traffic signals. That
many traffic signals within that short a distance will cause more traffic issues.
The 140lh Street alignment offers the most flexibility for future growth and expansion when
dealing with traffic issues.
Prefer that homes rather than businesses be impacted on 14dh Street.
This alignment may encourage more commercial business to move in along Fenway Avenue.
. 142nd Street Alignment:
The alignment would create less wetland, floodplain and right-orway impacts than the other
alignment alternatives.
. 14S'h Street Alignment (existing location):
The alignment impacts the affordable housing at the intersection ofCSAH 8 and TH 61.
Can the houses on the south side ofCSAH 8 near the intersection with TH 61 be relocated to
the south on their lots?
Residents along CSAH 8 near the intersection with TH 61 experience difficulty accessing the
roadway due to heavy traffic volumes.
If this route is chosen, homes along existing CSAH 8 would need to be bought, and there is a
concern about finding comparable housing.
Choose this alternative, eliminate my house and relocate me.
Take out both sides of houses on 145lh Street and keep the same route.
If 1451h Street is chosen, the City could acquire both sides. More commercial land is
available, which is value/investment to the City.
I don't want to live in a "fishbowl" that increased traffic would create.
Excessive noise is an issue due to heavy truck traffic.
Select one of the other alignment alternatives and construct a cul-de-sac on 145lh Street.
This alignment would affect the entire neighborhood.
There will be access issues and the road curvature needs to be fixed if this alignment is
chosen. .
The improvements should stay on 145lh Street because the wetlands would be disturbed on
1401h Street.
CSAH 8/14 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES - Updated July 2002
- 2-
Do not choose this alternative and relocate me because I have made recent improvements to
my home.
. 147'h Street Alignment:
The alignment would alleviate traffic using side streets as an alternate route to existing
CSAH 8 when congestion occurs at the existing intersection of 14th Street and TH 61. It
would also decrease the traffic congestion along existing CSAH 8 near the intersection with
TH61.
The alignment would create less wetland,floodplain and right-ol-way impacts.
Noise would be a big issue for City Hall if 14th Street is chosen.
This alignment would reduce traffic on 145th Street by diverting traffic comingfrom the
north.
Several neighbors are opposed to this alignment because it would affect the neighborhood.
Move the City Park and balljields.
Residences along 147th Street should be purchased if there are major impacts to those
properties.
The 14th St. alignment will create noise impacts and potential safety problems for children.
. General Alignment Comments:
Some residents are concerned about the loss of trees and parking areas in front of
residences.
There are concerns about the property resale values along all of the alternative alignments.
RESPONSE TO ALIGNMENT COMMENTS:
The four alternative alignments each have pros and cons, which are being analyzed. This analysis
includes an evaluation of the social, environmental, and economic impacts of each alternative,
including the issues summarized above. Based on the analysis done to date, it has been
determined that the 140th Street alignment will be eliminated. Environmental impacts, right-of-
way and construction costs, and travel patterns are the main reasons for eliminating the
alternative. The remaining three alternatives will continue to be analyzed.
CSAH 8114 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES - Updated July 2002
- 3 -
THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED REGARDING
THE PROJECT:
COMMENT: Can a traffic signal be installed at the intersection of 14dh Street and TH 61?
RESPONSE: A traffic signal is warranted and justified, and will be installed in 2003.
COMMENT: Can a traffic signal be installed at the intersection of CSAH 14 and Otter Lake
Road?
RESPONSE: A signal warrant analysis will be completed for the intersection. If it is
determined that a traffic signal is warranted and justified, it will be installed as part of this
project.
COMMENT: Can improvements be made to the 1-35E/CSAH 14 interchange? The interchange
needs to be reconstructed before afour-lane roadway is constructed. This will create afimnel
and back up traffic to the east.
RESPONSE: A major reconstruction project has not been funded or scheduled by the
Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) or Anoka County at this time. However,
interim efforts are being made to determine how to improve the safety of the interchange. One of
the options recommended by Anoka County is the installation of all-way stop signs. Approval
from Mn/DOT is needed for the installation ofthe signs. The surrounding communities are
working together to look for future opportunities to build an improved interchange. City Council
and staff members from Lino Lakes, Hugo, and Centerville, along with Mn/DOT staff and local
legislators met on January 30,2002. The City Councils will approve resolutions supporting an
interchange reconstruction project. Anoka County has formally requested that discussions be
initiated by MnlDOT to prioritize and program the reconstruction ofthe interchange.
COMMENT: A new interchange at 1-35E/CSAH 4 is needed to alleviate traffic on CSAH 8/14.
RESPONSE: The construction of an interchange at I-35E and CSAH 4 would need to be
initiated by MnlDOT and is not currently being considered by Mn/DOT. An interchange is not
included in Anoka County's Capital Improvements Program or 2015 Comprehensive
Transportation Plan. In addition, new interchanges must be reviewed and authorized for access
by the Federal Highway Administration and the Metropolitan Council.
COMMENT: Residents and business owners near the intersection ofCSAH 14 and Otter Lake
Road experience difficulties accessing their driveways from CSAH 14 during periods of heavy
traffic.
RESPONSE: Efforts will be taken during the roadway design to ensure safe access to and from
CSAH l4/CSAH 8 for adjacent property owners.
CSAH 8/14 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES - Updated July 2002
- 4-
COMMENT: How wide will the roadway be and where will the path be located?
RESPONSE: The roadway is proposed to consist offour through lanes with turn lanes and a
center median. The exact dimensions of the roadway and the location of the path will be
determined after the preferred alternative has been selected.
COMMENT: Will there be any assessments to the property owners?
RESPONSE: It has not yet been determined whether property owners will be assessed.
COMMENT: What are the plans for the expansion ofTH 61? TH 61 needs to be upgraded at
the same time that CSAH 8 is realigned. Not to do so would negate the advantage of the
realignment.
RESPONSE: Traffic is expected to double on TH 61 within the next 20 years. Improvements
similar to those being proposed for CSAH 8/14 will be needed on TH 61. TH 61 is currently
under the jurisdiction of MnlDOT, but is programmed to be turned over to Washington County
in the future. TH 61 will remain under the jurisdiction of MnlDOT until funding is made
available for the improvements. Funding is not anticipated to be available for roadway
improvements until after 2010. Washington County has met with MnlDOT regarding the CSAH
8/14 project and discussed the need for upgrading TH 61. The County has asked MnlDOT to
initiate the discussions to transfer the jurisdiction of TH 61 to the County and schedule the
appropriate funds to do so.
COMMENT: What is the possibility of constructing two 2-lane one~way streets instead of one
4-lane road?
RESPONSE: One-way streets generally work well where there are parallel streets a block or
two apart and where an adequate number of cross streets are available to permit circulation of
traffic. For example, in St. Paul and Minneapolis a grid system of streets has been established,
with closely spaced parallel streets. On CSAH 8, traffic traveling in opposite directions would
be separated by several hundred feet, with cross streets spaced at y., mile intervals. This system
would be confusing to strangers, so safety would be a concern. Other disadvantages include
increased travel distance, potential cut-through traffic on local streets and potential problems for
emergency vehicle access.
COMMENT: Are any improvements plannedfor 14(jh Street east ofTH 61 if that was the
selected alignment?
RESPONSE: The City's development plans do not show a need for four lanes east ofTH 61.
Intersection modifications are expected as part of this project if this alternative is chosen.
COMMENT: Diverting traffic away from 145'h Street would move traffic away from the
commercial downtown area.
CSAH 8/14 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES - Updated July 2002
- 5 -
RESPONSE: Traffic on TH 61 is projected to be over 20,000 vehicles per day regardless of
what alignment is chosen. The existing and future City land use plans, including commercial
areas, will be taken into consideration in the selection of the preferred alignment.
COMMENT: People are traveling way too fast on the roadway in both Lino Lakes and Hugo.
People are passing on the shoulder at Otter Lake Road. The speed limit should be lowered and
enforced.
RESPONSE: The speed limit on CSAH 8/14 is 30 mph from TH 61 to Y, mile west, and
55 mph from that point to the intersection with 1-35. Speed limits in Minnesota are set by the
Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) based on engineering and traffic
investigations. If a new roadway is constructed, Anoka and Washington Counties will request
Mn/DOT to perform a speed study to determine a safe and reasonable speed limit along the
corridor. The speed limit is not expected to change significantly.
Education and enforcement are needed to eliminate speeding. Speeding is a problem throughout
Washington and Anoka Counties on every type of road.
COMMENT: The culvert between Elmcrest and Everton needs to be enlarged. It freezes up and
water comes up close to the road.
RESPONSE: A drainage analysis will compare existing conditions with proposed conditions.
Water quality/rate control ponds will be constructed to provide effective water quality treatment
prior to discharge to surface water bodies and to ensure that future peak rates of runoff are less
than or equal to existing rates. Planning measures include coordination with the City of Hugo
and with the Rice Creek Watershed District.
COMMENT: Can overhead utility lines be buried as part of the project?
RESPONSE: Underground utility lines can be buried as part ofthe project. The City would
have to pay the cost of burying the utility lines. Property owners may have to pay the cost to
switch from overhead to underground services.
COMMENT: Will the City of Hugo residents, especially the immediate area residents, have
input regarding the preferred alignment?
RESPONSE: As part of the public involvement process, four or five meetings in the
community are planned during the project development. Input from the residents is important to
make sure nothing is overlooked in the study process. As an example, the study area was
expanded as a direct result of comments made at the first public meeting.
COMMENT: Will the City Councils have a say in the selection of the road location? Who will
make the final decision?
RESPONSE: City staff from Hugo and Lino Lakes are part of the project management team
and have kept the Councils informed on the project. At their July meetings, the City Councils
were asked to concur on the preferred alignment alternatives to carry forward through the
CSAH 8/14 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES - Updated July 2002
- 6-
environmental assessment (EA) process. The City Councils will also be asked to concur on the
final alignment selection at the conclusion ofthe EA process and to approve the roadway plans
when completed. The Washington County Board of Commissioners will make the final decision
on the location.
COMMENT: Brush at the /-35E interchange restricts sight lines.
RESPONSE: The Minnesota Department of Transportation has been asked to review the
intersection.
COMMENT: Can the road be connected to TH 6/ north of 147'h Street by the post office?
RESPONSE: A major intersection will exist at TH 61/147'h Street/Oneka Lake Boulevard even
if the county road is on a different alignment, because of projected traffic volumes on Oneka
Lake Boulevard. Another major intersection with TH 61, close to 147th Street, would not be
desirable from a traffic operations standpoint.
COMMENT: Can 14dh Street be connected to the freeway frontage road?
RESPONSE: Extending l40th Street west to the freeway frontage road is in the City of Hugo's
transportation plan but, due to environmental issues, may not be constructed.
COMMENT: What is the process for property acquisition?
RESPONSE: All property owners affected by the project will be contacted by Washington
County's Acquisition Specialist after the preferred alignment alternative has been selected. An
informational brochure titled "Acquisition Information for Property Owners" is available from
Washington County.
COMMENT: Meetings with individual neighborhoods should be held to get their concerns.
RESPONSE: All property owners within and surrounding the study area will continue to be
invited to the public meetings. These public meetings allow all of the potentially affected
individuals to obtain information and provide input on the project.
COMMENT: Wetlands don't seem to be an issue with developments; why should they be an
issue with this project?
RESPONSE: Impacting wetlands is an issue with development. According to the Wetland
Conservation Act (WCA), when a wetland is proposed to be impacted, an attempt must be made
to avoid the impact. If the impact cannot be avoided, it must be minimized and the impacted
area must be replaced.
CSAH 8/14 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES - Updated July 2002
- 7 -
COMMENT: It was reported that a traffic signal would be constructed at the TH 61/147'h
Street intersection.
RESPONSE: A traffic signal will be installed in 2003 at the TH 6l!l40th Street intersection, not
at the TH 611147'h Street intersection.
CSAH 8/14 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES - Updated July 2002
- 8 -
COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 8/14 IMPROVEMENTS
1-35 TO HIGHWAY 61
PROJECT BACKGROUND INFORMATION
NEED FOR PROJECT
Traffic Operations
~ Traffic volumes on CSAH 8/14 more than doubled on segments of the road since
1992. Existing traffic volumes range from 11,000 to 16,400 average daily
traffic (ADT).
~ The two-way average daily traffic volume on the roadway is projected to increase
by 2 to 3 times within the next 20 years to 22,000 to 32,000 vehicles.
~ Engineering studies show that 2-lane roadways begin to experience
unacceptable operations at 10,000 to 12,000 vehicles per day in developing
areas, depending on access conditions.
~ This roadway is classified as a Minor Arterial. Its primary function is to provide
regional mobility.
Roadwav Condition
~ Bituminous roadways are designed for a service life of 35 years. This roadway
was constructed 35 years ago and received an overlay 7 to 10 years ago.
Pedestrian Safety
~ There are no bicycle or pedestrian paths along the roadway except the sidewalks
in front of the residential properties near Highway 61.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
~
~
~
V>
\df'~ ~
~" G I
~c.h~\ Y
'L0 VJ ;JJ
. 4:J l"vlP/6
r1,l(). ,.-.l
\"" VV'
yo{'
Reconstruction of the roadway with 4 through lanes, turn lanes, and a center
median. Location to be determined through the study process.
Construction of a pedestrian/bicycle path.
Construction of new culverts and storm sewer.
PROJECT COST AND FUNDING
~
~
Project construction cost is estimated to range fron\1 $6.1 million to $7.7 million.
Project to be funded with:
$3.6 million of Federal funding
Washington County, Anoka County, Hugo, and Lino Lakes will provide
the remaining funding
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
TKDA
~ Construction will most likely begin in Spring 2004 and be completed early
in 2005.
~ Access to residential and business properties will be maintained at all times.
~
tS'&M
'~"I~!!. ,~_go
O~MN WIll
~ ~11,:l!IQ;n;
U FAA':!G-;!ll5!l
35E
z
~
~--w.-.~
LINO
LAKES
w
>
<<
z
z
w
>
~
ROBIN
147th ST. N.
\?\.~Q
~'i-S
\.
S'i-~
Q"
148
ROAD
I~
145th ST. N
145th ST. N.
w
>
~
>-
~
"
Z
I.,.. ~ 140t ST.
/1
<;j
j; 140th Street ~
. ~
o recommended to be
Qj eliminated from tJ
. '"
a further study'" i'i
~ a:: 4.
o
.
U
Egg
'"
Lake
w
>
~
r~~
~
'"
~
~~z
~
~
o
Z
<d
t.""I'rc
~
010
4
HUGO
E
.
i'
a
'?
o
o
;;;
o
f'
o
~
64th
lJOth
s'
N.
GENERAL ALIGNMENT ALTERNATIVES
Date: June 10, 2002
File: R\200802\Maps\csahBrev.dwg
en
I-
Z
W
~
W
>
o
0:::
a.
~
('.
(J)
(J)
w
u
..q ..... 0
;:a~o::
>- IV a.
<( ~
s:-g,w
:J: .-
C) :J: J:
- 0 I-
:J: -
It'l
9 f? (J)
<( - -
~ I-
~ <C
en J:
~ ~
:J
o
()
z
o
I-w
O(j)
=><(
ll::J:
tfjo..
Z
o
o
Zw
(.9(j)
-<(
(j)J:
~o..
w
(f)
<(
J:
0..
>-
o
=>
I-
(j)
en
I-W
wz>
NWI-
>-::2:<{
.....IZZ
<{(9OC
z-W
<{-'I-
<{-I
<{
~
I-
o
3
OC
I-
en
Z
o
o
cb' ~.~~..
wZt-
I- OC W, .
U 0:::::2: <{.
W Wz 2.
-Iu.. OC
WW(Dw
enOC::;!~
c......<{
o
W
zen
-W
::2:::2:
00:::0
ZWo
1-1-
W::>
fIlo
0:::
c..
"'i/'
Of)
o
o
'"
,.,
m
.9
..,.
o
o
'"
'C
"-
<(
'" 8
8 ?;l
'" ~
~o"
",_.0
2 E
.0 1l
" "
LL 0
-1<",
o
o
'"
~
'"
2
.0
"
LL
2J ,W Q"LL.
<{ I- ZO(J)
I- :'5 <((I)W
;Z>'.';:~.J;:sti~
W>-~::;~;:[<(
::2: 0 w u z :2'Z
OOW_<>=
Z::>I-(J)::;;UW
OI-(J)WZ5i~
OCen(J)IOO<(
.... ~I-~Zw
.-- 0 >OI
Z cr: Z Uf--
ill n. lliUJ
UJ C) c f,/)
W CIJ .!: ,9 Q) &
- _-0 _ "-
::>> u c ~. c .~:2 :J
UJ~U)'-roo ffi:J 0::0
'O.m :J a.. Q)::J 0'" (f.I U)
UJECD.O....Ul u=-g,&
- >.~"'O ..... .s '0 "'0 <: ~ ('U u..
>- ~ Q) 0 J!! ~ z ~ ~1- ~ ~
C8.~tf.mE....lQ) ro.a
::>>e 3:..... g- D..-:;
...0.. m a: u
UJ
z
0(9
01-
_.....Z
.....I....-
m:2:ili
::>o:::w
c..~:::2:
Z
c..i
'Z::; -I<
'Q to Ci 8
o'f-':::Jz 0
- ~'a.'_ '"
c:.::J>:........::~;';oc ~
1ll.::;;.C!l....:: '"
::J'U::zw "
0."0'- "
,';;':u.;.& q: m
"- '/W:>: .,
.z'W
:-:::;;.
Z
0(9
,Q"r":z ~
ffi ~ ili ?;l
::> 'OC W ~
c.. 5:.:::2: -,
Z
'"
o
o
'"
~
"
"
'"
-,
.9
'"
8
'"
~
'"
2
.0
"
LL
Z
o
Ol-~ '"
-I<{ - g
m ::2: I- '"
::> OC UJ a.
c.. 0 UJ <(
u..::2:
Z
Z
o '"
o I- (9 0
- <{ Z ?;l
-I :2: I- ?:>
m c:: UJ gJ
~ 0 UJ Iii
u..::2: -,
Z
-I<
'"
8
'"
,.,
"
-,
Q)
>
~
tll
~
c:
Q)
~
l!?
tll
(J)
Q)
~
tll
o
-I<
N
o
o
N
0,
O,fj'
=nn
.... ~h'
jiioioo.: t.,,~
III-
..~,
-
-
en
:::J
Ol
::l
<(
-<
~
~
,
COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 8/14 IMPROVEMENTS
1-35 TO HIGHWAY 61
GET INVOLVED
STAY INVOLVED
>- Watch for articles in city newsletters
.>- Visit the project website:
www.co.washinqton.mn.us/trnsphdv/proiects.htm
>- Attend public meetings
Tentative schedule:
January 2003
July 2003
>- Ask questions
>- Offer comments
Contacts
Washington County
Ms. Christine Manthey
Design Coordinator
11660 Myeron Road North
Stillwater, MN 55082
(651) 430-4316
chris.manthey@.co.washinaton.mn.us
TKDA
.1'1
TKDA
Mr. Tim Chalupnik, P.E.
Project Manager
1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza
444 Cedar Street
SI. Paul, MN 55101
(651) 292-4430
chalupnik. ta@.tkda.com
'~'I~!l...,~~o
CIoJ9O"" 5!I.Bl
~16'1'29-8V6
U flll<'<&la56
,