HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-11-27 CC Packet
"
CALL TO ORDER A __ , i-' )
, ~iJ-iv < jv1J-4'""'"
1. Roll Call ( r'vU1,liV V~~--~~-_/ ",-" .
APPROVAL OF AG~~J:/wt",tY--' ---
A W ARDS/PRESENTATIONSfAPPEARANCES
J,..r." Mr. Peter Rosenthal- 7129 - 20th Avenue (Site Plan Review) 1/-Ci. ,,'is/;11.:-x>r-
I,.Z:' Mr. ~oo vanJi~~,~ ~:!~!0-mendment to Ord. #4 allowing "Slaughter , ,
Shop lf~ > -::rf--~-Z()'J/--lr:2" ~ (}zd <'Ire /'u)r; efle1- .utJ.j - Yslz~"'",
3. Mr. Milo'Berinett - ApprovaYOf,the --Purchase of S-CB"", (S,elf-Contained
Breathing Apparatuses) { P<--,(,h,,/la.tcr,,: .. Ct'fW;J(J{<;>o-;--
'SC:l1A~- )J<2{~}<'-/~'-'
PUBLIC HEARINGS ~ (Lcy--
): i 7 !/.),l ~""Y'-'
1. Proposed Ordinance #74 (Right-of-Way) 1'0/' i: ,tp"- ~ -/-0;" .
(it<p'ut-I)...ki.;,c,'- K"'(-Zlj:',: jr--e V",'~~"'ef ' v,u~Ji.,.1
COUNCIL BUSINESS q____ !-"u ~c"'-< <-t...~",
L
II.
III.
IV.
V.
,\,"
\l'
\'"
\! 't,"
.", '\ '
")~ ."" '..,
~ ,'v if '
~\'f" ,\ i~
t'!~,.. .~
I> OJ, ','
7"'~
\....: "-
/ ,.
v~
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Wednesday, November 27,2002
--6-;30--I~.~_L_
\ ' .
Qusbec-Street DrlliRage kSlIes (ClIjJl.a) N0J-- /I~d-'" ") - f l! '1
Cable Commission Proposed New Building (Capra)- (' "\'V;;.c"c,<,-s-
Proposed Historical Downtown District (Capra,) _ ""C It Q ~ ,2,C {j;:" Ie 1'0 cor fYll5'/~
Resolution #02-058 - Tom Thumb Tobacco Violation Fine - JJq"A,<,--/e "'- j1^<"'~ JU-e< t)
Resolution #02-061- Kelly's K, o,rner,IQ Ob~ac Yj~II,lU'ati(On Fine - (."""-.['<-11<-.1 *' Ie h," lkp 'I
Resolution #02-059 - Tr~nsI!rri~OfltU" fof~ter Main Trunk Costs I
for CSAH 14 Water MaID :Jw-c"Ux ':J r;:tL-v~'J
EDC Request ~ot: Fundjng (New Resident Packets and Snow, Biz 2003//&
Activities) 1"e1'7i,-yI./{1~ < < /7,_
~o{V3, /)'-';..:0:")0..(;, <;; (h,,~. J -t'5ro It -::,fl u.d~.:..,~ f~ri'(,' ~tf, 5f1ruCfZLV-e...
VI. CONSENT AGENDAvf' L-c t-L['~ i {. (,'i' >'<;.v ,- fS(~~
1. City ofCenterville November 11, 2002 through November 27,2002 Claims
'{Jf'1 2. Centennial Fire District Claims
~~k7 . ~~ Successful Completion of Annual Performance Review of Public Works
cD1' Employee Tedd Peterson - Completion of Year 3
4. Northdale Construction Pay Request - $37,651.92
t::
"f::-
'3.'
</.'
']_t:{i..~
r'-'b-~"
\ LAl.
(/7.
VII. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES
. ,.l"7L'Y- hrcLL!t5
1. November 5, 2002 Canvassing Board Minutes- ~; D, '{ If (',Lp'-lt/)J~i~
2. November 9, 2002 Canvassing Board Minutes - (JL'~ ,
3. November 13, 2002 Conncil Meeting Minutes . {!.-a~/ IN (,~,y----'
VIII. ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES
u: 1540 Peltier Lake Drive (Update) ---vl:;L1t t<~< <6, .C~.I)cIi:J::.:r1-"'1~ )Jf."'.,.;., I'J<.~._<"
....r ., .. N' t.-l!>"f:M.!t!:l"", ,./Y""y 7<""d' ~...."<!<<...c,,.'"
\4;, CapItal Projects (Update) I;;'f "J1..b."'i../e<;.t;'l4i"")'
\,Y. Building Permit Fee Review (Update) -' At:!z,.d&-:'lt4;i''',
. 4. Pending Issues 1-. 4' ,/_.1 L? L, L. . X..
~. TV wr>t-f7U/t" ::;ll1jt wr 7Y"tv,!.-t<k~ t"'- . (..Ie<. .
IX. ADJOURNMENT ~tt., ka6 ~fc&.U:l dt! ~~nl.~
c l~ veP-dy Iv btJ~~' fur -Ir~-{Au.<r::J....s
/Pdt.
Pto i4 {(Jf.A.'tZv(: fJ ex;/- ";;.i"[{...."" · ,.~0..1 he
tt;~,~ W' d'rL fX.(jy(.d4!.u<
.,J I
8 ~c~t.LR-t- &d-h,r 5tru /--.
~.'J
OC7-15-2002 12:23
RICE CREEK WRTERSHED
651 766 4196
P.02/03
RlCE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRlCT
3585 N LEXrNGTON AVE STE 330
ARDENHILLS MN 55126-8056
PH# 651.766-4191 FX#651-766-4J96
PERMIT NUMBER: 02-104
c: City ofCelllerville
Distriot Enaineer
RCWD Inspector
RCWD Fiie
PERMIT
Pllnma.llt to the R1.1lcs and Regulations of the RiQe Creek Watet'$hed District and the District policies and
standards. and oased upon the statements lmd information contained in the permit application. letlenl.
ma]l5, and plans slIbmitted by the applicant lmd other supporting data, all of which are made a part hereof
by refmnce. permission is bereby ~l1ted to tlle applicant named below to conduct the activity
described below:
Name of Applic.ant (Permittee) .. fP!'I:ljeCf name T Sw-ety Amou'" 0>",.0'
Pet" Rosenthal Ro,entllaJ Prolleny $2,,00.00 receivod 9/17/02 AJtoka
Addr8ss (No. & Street, City, Slate, Zip code)
288 Rohavic Lane, Uno Lakes, MN 55014
Plume # 's IF~ I Celf Fha"" I Mise,
763.786.S5j6 763-786-6007
Autharf>:lld /<) f PurpOrt of Project:
Final Sile Drainage Plan for addition of II building and associated parking areas to an existing
prop~rty, 9,450:: SF, Z.77:t acres in accordance with Grading, brainage, and Erosion Control
Plan prepared by E.G. Rud and Sons, 1,c..revised 10/4/02. received 10/4102.
Property Location Dale a/Issuance Expiration Date
200 feet north oiCSAH 14.nd west "fCSAH 2J, Ceoterville Oclob~r IS. 2002 April 14, 2004
This permit is granted subject to the fOllowing GENERAl and SPECIAL PROVISIONS;
GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The project sholl be in a'cordanc~ with the plans most recently submitted and approved by the
District as part of the r<:<:ord of this project.
2, Erosion control mea$~rc' shall be adequately designed for the site characteristics. They may include
staked haybalcs, diversion channels, $edim~nt ponds. or sediment fences. They shall be instaIied in
accordance with "l'rotectin>: Water Qu~lilY in Urban Areas-Best Management Practices for
Minnesota," MPCA, October 1989, prior to Qommencement a.,d shall be maintained throughout the
project. All exposed soil shaU be stabilized as sam as possible llIJC no 1Mer than 14 ""ys after the
completion of the grading. The District Inspector may require Permittee to provide additional
erosion control measures beyond those included in the approved plan at his discretion when site
conditions walTlUlt
3. The soi1s ero,ion and .ediment controls for the rou~h ll!adin~ phMe of the project must be installed
prior to any grading operations, The District Inspector must be notified when the initial ~sion
controls are lIIstalle<i Illld prior to any l:l"ading operations (651-i66-4191).
4, Upon completion of the project and stabilization of all graded areas, all tempo~ry er<Jsion controls
.hall be removed.
5. This permit is not llIlsignable by t.,e Permittee. except with the written consent oflho RCWD.
6. The Pennittoe shall l:flll'l access to the site at all rellBonab1e times during and after construction to
al.lt.l:1orized representatives of the RCWD for inspection of tbe work authorized hereunder,
OCT-15-2002 12: 30
RICE CREEK WRTERSHED
651 766 4196
P. 03/03
7. In all oases wh..,.. the Permittee, by performing the work authorized by thie permit, ahall involve the
taking, using, or damaging of any property rights or interest~ of any other person or persons, Or of
all)' publicly owned lands Or improvements thereon or interests therein, Ihe Permittee, before
proceeding, Shall obtain the written COll~enl of ell persons, agennies, or authorities ooncerned, and
shall acq1.ltte all property, rights and interest. needed for the work.
8. This pernnil is permis.ive only. No liability shall be imposed on the RCWD or any of iiB officers,
agents, or employees, officially or personally, on aOllount oflhe granting hereof or on account of any
damage to any person or property resulting from any act or oml.ssion of the Permittee or any of its
agents, employees, or contractors. This pewit shall not be construed as estopping or limiting any
lesal ~lairns or right of action of any person against the Permittee, its agents, employees or
contl'actors, for any damage or injury resulting from any su~h act or omission, or as estopping or
llmiting any legal claim or right of action of the RCWD against the Permittee, its agents, employees,
or contractors for violation of or failure to ccmply with the pennit of al'pli~able provisions of law,
9. Any stonnwater management facilities approved as par! of this permit shall be properly maintained
in perpetuity to assure that they contin\.le to flliJCtion as originally &.rgned.
10. Within 10 day;! "fproject completion, you will notify the District Inspector at 651-766-4195. Once
the lmpector verifies that site conditions comply with all permit requirements, your <:ash surety will
be returned to the remitter,
1 L FAILl'RE TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF TtHS PER..\11T IS A VIOLA 110N OF
THE LAW M"D MAY RES1JLT IN FOR."EITUR.E OF PER.WTTEE'S SURETY.
SPECIAL STIPuLATIONS
None
Allthllrized Signature.,
x~/M+-
Steve Hobbs, District Administrlltor
KH
~+ ~v-( !f~J
TOTAL P.03
_J
-----
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centervi11e Ord. #4
Commercial uses (as defined by Ordinance #4) in the M-1 District will follow the Commercial guidelines
for percentage of green space. For all other properties in the M-1 District, the maximum accessory
structure allowed is 704 square feet and 440 square feet in the R-4 District, neitherto exceed the size of
the principal structure if an attached garage does not exist. If an attached garage exists, the maximum
accessory structure allowed is two (2) percent of the lot size or a maximum of 200 square feet.
Division 70: Site Pian Review Required
For all land use applications or permit applications, a site plan review is required by the Zoning
Administrator or their designee. Said review shall take place thirty (30) days prior to the desired Planning
and Zoning meeting. For example, if a property owner desires to construct a home (or any other
structure) and desires to have it presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission in May, the
application and site plan need to be presented to the Zoning Administrator or his/her designee the first
week in April.
Section 070-010: Submittal Requirements.
A. Boundary survey of parcel including identification of all monuments; and
B. Scaled location of all buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalk, trails, parking stalls
and curbing; and
C. Scaled identification of all setback dimensions from property lines; and
D. Scaled locations of all existing and proposed utilities and easements; and
E. Scaled depictions of floor plans for each story; and
F. Scaled depictions of each building elevation and descriptions of exterior building
materials and color schemes; and
G. Scaled site grading plans, including erosion and sedimentation control mechanisms
and procedures; and
I. Scaled delineations of any shoreland, floodplain or wetland areas on the site; and
J. Identification of any floodplain or wetland encroachments and detailed mitigation
plans; and
K. Detailed landscape plans, illustrating size, types and locations of all materials, a
description of site seeding or sodding, a description of the timetable for site
landscaping and the identification of any irrigation systems; and
L. Detailed descriptions of any site fencing, including type, location and height.
All plans shall be dated and bear the preparer(s) name(s), including professional registrations or
certifications when appropriate or required.
Page 18 of 59
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
Section 070-020: Review Requirements. For actions that will require City review, applicants shall
submit sixteen (16) sets of site plans with a required application form and appropriate fees to the City
Clerk for distribution. Site plans will be evaluated for consistency with documentation requirements.
Upon acceptance of the application, site plans will be distributed to the appropriate City entity for review
and recommendation.
Action to approve, modify or deny site plan applications will be based upon consistency of the application
with the City's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, other policies and official controls and the
compatibility of the proposed action with existing area land uses, existing area investments and
neighborhood character, capacity of public streets and utilities and future planned land uses.
Section 070-030: Exceptions. The City may waive certain submittal requirements for residential
variance applications, when it is determined that submittal requirements are not applicable or are not
necessary to complete a review of the proposed action. The City may also waive certain submittal
requirements for other actions, when site plan information for the subject property has previously been
submitted to the City and may be more appropriately supplemented with new information.
Division 75: Final Gradinq and Landscapinq
"
Lots in all districts shall be subject to the following:
Subd. 1
No Occupancy Permit shall be issued until the lot upon which the structure is
constructed is brought to finished grade as specified, except during
inclement weather an escrow shall be deposited with the City as approved in
the fee schedule; and
Subd.2
Within six (6) months from the issuance of the Occupancy Permit the lot shall
be landscaped in a manner, which prevents erosion due to wind or water.
Extensions may be granted at the Building Official's discretion.
Division 80: loninq Districts/Use Requlations
Section 080-010: Zoning Map. A map entitled "Center/ille Zoning Map" is hereby adopted by
reference and declared to be part of this Ordinance as the Official Zoning Map.
Such map shall be on permanent file and available for public inspection in the City Hall. It shall be the
responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain and keep the map up to date and to record each amendment
thereto within thirty (30) days after official publicatiop of the ordinance adopting the amendment.
Section 080-020: Interpretation ofthe Zoning Map. Where due to the scale, lack 0"1 detail or illegibility
of the Zoning Map attached hereto, there is an uncertainty, contradiction or conflict as to the intended
location of any zoning district boundary as shown thereon, the Zoning Administrator shall make an
interpretation of the map upon the request of any person. Any person aggrieved by any such
interpretation may appeal such interpretation to the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. The Board of
Appeals and Adjustments, in interpreting the Zoning Map or deciding any appeal, shall apply to the
following standards:
Page 19 of 59
1__
r
286i ;oHAvlc ""CANE
i-JI\IO I..AKE&-, ~ ~=--Of4
iEl-5:, (bSl) 482~2&:l~
VICINITY MAl='
F~Jti~,
J
.'
,j
~-~~
C~"fo".,i/~
c,,,
"'.~
:;~
il:;j
:::'i!
H
~
...~-~\,.
1''''
""",,,,,,"
_.........,,~.
l-~_'-~"
'5:5110 \
OJ",. ..=-;
O\lERf1..0'll
-~~-~-~~~
""
1111-
1I11~-
-IIII:-;::n_
r-10'
,T90
905.~
111""\111
UJI~,m
l"'1II1"'-11l:
NOTf'
G;"."~lAI' roc r(F; 13' M,~['
(stENCTE)
It<ECOHlllACI0R.t<TtlrSOrT'O'',I.<HSllB5!11Ul(
"C;:OlnliLE fABR.C. SFtC ~5m FOR l~E O!l...1<U\Ml
~~"~~ !lL,~t~:e~~~r~~~~~~;~R ~~~""~~g" "~'''F~(
f?'PR.l.!'
NORTH
~
GRAPHIC SCALE
. .
'IU _ ,al
'..... "'"
~
~
( lU 1'fXr 1
11:>",,-30 IL
~fe5?AP2S:0 ="r',
E.a., ~UO of f;ON&, INC,
I...ANO &URY"YORS>
slaG\! 1...5XING;TON AYSL N=
CIRCI.,5FIN=&, MN SS>G\!I..;.
TEl.:.... ('6~)"$b~*;,b i=,Ax .<'6;;) 'U-b.2tiZ>'
'1Mf
i
L
<$f<lOI~
II
,
,
'D~IN~'~
NJt> ,~ftc'&'O~
CdIU~ICO~ J>L..AAl
I
-.',
,.....
. . ,,-:-:-,,~.'--;--o'-"'"":-:'-""'''''
~-
I
~......-'
-
om
" p 0
:0
-~
~
p
"
D
'"
,-
~
oi
~
, I
I
I
, I
"->>a,:,,,'
-'----".x_",
I
"',
-oJ....Troocf .....\.
~::::_ :L------..=I1-=-.~
, .
x_tl
..-----~--- ----
__.m.-'-.... .
"
_..:~.
_..._m.___. .
r-:-
.J
-
~"'l
L
-r=
..-..-
,
"-
x~
x_~
0_
~,--"...-.
. --..'r
'S),
.":,66-1.Q8 N' 89'06'44" W
TYPICAL SECTION
BAFFLE' WEH? DETAIL
COHCRsn.: sPILLWAY
....'.., -
')~,'2':~~"""'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''.
"\""""<tN""'''!''''':'"'-I>WiD~~.
'r:'~~'~-
"'",~,''''-''''' .
",,-'iOP YiEIR 905.0
.lQ9-'(R P(AK ELEV 904-8"7
r---'~ 1
h?""~-::~~'tL 4'
\'- 1 ~ CO~ICR[TE SURf ACO:
~ C""SS ~ ;.,:;;:;ilC;:;AT[
~
""""'.......~..-
NW\, 'il03.5
BJ.S;:
/..5a.ENO
,,/1(,/1.9
DENOTES EXISTING [LEVA TION
-
DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVAllON
(TOP OF CURB WHERE APPLICABLE)
DENOrrs EXISTING CONTGUR'
DENOTES PROPOSED CONtouR
DENOTES OlRECnON Of Of<A1NAG[
NOTES: - lOPD vERI~IELI IN FIELD SY CG. RLlq_
I'
P!.,..,,"
. C ;" ~.':"-.,,:c~'~':'
'"
. "'
~ . 5
, ..
~ :
'" ";
~ '<
~ ~
-~. ! '..---
I ...,-_ __ _). -' _ __ _,---
, /y.. --" Z20::~:~i'>Jfft~ Il)..~
. a' ~ j(
: f! I
I ,1/17ON)) ;'PPJI)II>0S J
I J . A?-"-f: . I'
I . /
III) e~. M~'%^.'~7h..' .l
I,,~J .,'~ f
Ni' 12.0. :1
i . I
-: \,' .
i , '-. - / \'\ \ 130'4 ~ ['j(r~"'t'~ .... .;"r::'
+D~vw~~~,~I~~~t~ '*..+ -* I*r'il'-~*-*- tl
. i L_____ - L -~ - *-~' -*- -"',~-'T · ,.~ ~
'~ 0 v." -/\:.,. .,.~
_ . " \,\'lI'
~--:-r -. r ~- I - --.... ..
'I. 1''i~.O . 100.00' I \00 ()
I . I &;S1D:tN'fIAt, AUAc
i j
I
I
I
I
\
-~~
(.0,', "
rq~~ ,~1i4
4
I
I
j
I
I
III?84
'12..
1'5"
1~
75
1"11,,.0
1~
~o
"
"
dl
t:.
c..o~1<UAl li,R'tA
,
!~
t".< .
l'~ ."
',~~~"
~
..
"
-;::
~
.1;
.
".:.,
"
~
----~-~---~------
!> ~
~ ~
~ "
! c,
1-'<1 1,1 _.1
'1"0 'e' ..
-: lJ) 'V' '--.~'-'
f\lPI'A"'"
\[1>1.\1 /"H
f\.~
O---'-----.p..-.."'..-'~.----.---5_-. B.....
p .
~--+
"""0
-I I
.J1J~lt .' !~!
f.rN;....
~.
Q07. _
~OX'-66
"'bA'f',
.E;'(I~'PA~t::'t~h ~I
fC~ol;,," Nee"
o
~,
<;)
Ii>
t/1
I
lo.
I~
,",~c<,.
.,',:~:,
,i,'!
{"ril
lilt!.
I
I
I
i
\1
J
75
qo
\1.0 'SO ea>">T"
o
'"
iCO
C~"lObe:IfiV,
=-1""'"
'd'!-._._~.-,-------pot>-- - - p p-~
l ~,,.:; W(.:~~.-'
. ~ J! t 1.
~ " i ·
~e; .-i-
_. L ~ ~
I
'!
o
::;.~
r' cd
Q><o
I "
\
f
I
t/SApoLe I
''1/
! t
a'lAuiu
_ f>
~ -". !'l
~I
51"-0''...,.-
5D~'
\',p.-p.
-----f\
6:>.0 rJ)
.~
5- - .
[ I
''i3~.
T:..;..,....e4...
~"-
.
0>
I
ru;
Il:~
\)').
I
I
I
I
I
.. '-i .... __..J
- - .---~-_.....---.-
"
ii
!
i.
-.........'"""'-~,--~-~..-._--,~--'"~-- -.--..-'.
"
I U~UJ~~ll ~"
'~r~~2.q ~:i,tt ~~, N.__. E~~~G5
.;g . c~\'J!r,I':~.\(.L1!:..0N.
'"'
--IZ4-;""Q
e-~-t~_ '
"1
L___
~
. .
-~~
.~~~..
--'~;l>.
/b().Q
o
o
~I
I
i
,
i
0'
",:
tn.'
tv\A.IN 51.
CJ). \0). 1'-\
.---,,-----_.__._---~--~_.._------
'I
o
~
I
I
I
i
I
j
:t
I-
o
l'~ 30'0"
Nop.:r\-'<
I'
~
rr
i;l:.
:t-
'QI
.('.Ii
'.'if
S rtE i l)('\ILPllJo DA-i'A
5(11:. A'I"'E.4' I\O,e.l~'3;F.' 2.S"A(.~
l:Jcllt..DIN6Af'J'4'S' J;:/lstIMS BL\)<;;.. ".:leoS...
NEIl! 1;Lr>\;. 3f?;Q5. F.
JUTAL15LDb.AlB\ rs-p~ S.+.
tLcoR.Al"M RA-ro, r:s;4eBo /10,87'1: ./1
l(f:{ :
II ',J I I W"TE"- M,AI'I\
. S .. "'MVtiA*- '{ S~
o.t> OVt;j(IJ-l'A? P<:J<:lRS
"t. Po\\IE,,- ,?OLl"S
~ C~E;'.N ocn-
@ ~\"'b 9<''';
E'--E.-PA~"P.r,:t.'~".e.. ~;:;"'B. '-1
o~ _~0"L.. S~UTl\]o.1 \
LII\J(yC~~<9. lh"L ,
;,sI4f>!"z<01'\ ...- .
,-----
I
;J
--~
f'&-j
liS
1....--
~--I
,=~
rcr--I
~
L:J
'.,
in
~u
ICi
,
""--.(
C"
fD
,
!
.\.
;;
"
",
I
. -f
II
-f
!I
"
11
q
fiy I~_~===~c=,
I:-~
D:"l.
I'ij r~=!i ~-~ ft1
'11~/ ,~{~'~]
"'-;'-'-'-~--'-lr~..-;".-..-,j:
r--~fV
ICG~ji\1'
,
r- -....
'-,
',:j
)':'
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
j,
I
IF
II c
,'n;r'
:~: pi
l It ~J[.~~jl
~='\J~~--:C:I--
l,-tlA'j
~o' {(::;o'
,,^C\LTI-,tNAI\!r l'K\lITY
"locos.
'.
i
rar
I "./
: I
j ,.L._l]
rT
'~I 'I
- -J~ t~~ti
'_____...Ii-
L_____\ f.:::=j F
"- 1--./
'.
~:-_--~_:::-.-;-;~.
'I
~---
I
I
!
i
r----..,
, ,
I I
,
"
"
;.-,
/
/'
>
.,
'I
,
,-- ---.-
I
,
__..._~_,=-r='=' .
-C~:~]:-.-__:-:T.
,
,
:::-"=:l
, .
Jl.Y.lOctl-Ul
.c:.J
1'L~ 'PLA1-\
Y"'ol'~
1""
i ~...--
~~~; 'I -::~=~?E~'2~-.-~-:=~~f"-~~~:-~fl~~~~~.r?:lf -~~-.-~~: -----:~:~:~'-Tf=
j ::1 L:.=.:...::: .....-'----l--' __~___l.W-_
--,", ~ ,
.-' --~~,-
.~ /
.-.,....--'-'
==r....-~
......--"'-.,
~..
--=.:~~'-T" ----- ..~~-;;~~.-.,.--.;-.--..-..-~..l;-t~2Sl[r?-'
..~.
~~~~ofJ~[~l~=tlE~c~~~;~~~~~c.-;~;~~:,\l. ..c~'C ~ 0;J~,'~~i~ " Ti~r
.:~~e<;(~.:;.fy;~; ',.--...--. .Ii)!f/{:~::#:~; ~~~- ~> ~Y~l ~r;:'%<':5; --______ _ ':'3" _
..-;=0;n::~-::;::T::::::j..I::.~::,,::::::.--li
L___._ ..~-=-~ -r -----=--:--
tIlo kt-l-l :'fl.$VAllcN
'18'~ I' S:A4:-
\.
?<-:-~;=~~~~---:=:-:~-~ .....~-,---:r=-~-~-=,--~~~=y:+~
~ f~~.c~_~~jl~ _~~ L_~ _~-c~ j~~:;~~~~J~~~~-;~:-~-:::.~:=:~~--J.r-:~-'7=~-lJ ~~-~-=:-_~:d:-_ - :'~~ Jh~'~ ~:_ --1[i~~~;_::_-:-~k:-~~~-=::~;l~.,,:=~~_.
r--~-1C5I -- If.E3i j --. - 1F7"'11 " [3 -_-__:"'-F~c~:~"11"T1j--' 'r:c:T~~~'~..oo .
.~~ ' _~: ~~;~~.:~I;::-:.~~;~~~:~'.ll; &,'i;:;tf-'S~;.:, ~::~L:;~;;~c;~; _ ;i>;"~d~t~~;;1i". ci~~~!i I
ff'-, * .J:':j';;l;~_....--~....._" "t.J_~'~' _~"'_tf 'II' ,--, "n.IT {7i f .1 \~j' , ,'?~ ",_."_,"<..,.,.~~..~,,..,
_ _ __ ~T ~j;,~=.,i;~1i:::~"'~t~:~~_: ~~!' - ,:J ' , ~i: J 5 .~;I;i~-?::~~ r ~~rr:>-r;-~J: ~ ~~ " ~"~~~4:;:;tif4;~1:'.~!;:_~;f;~~;0J:(;~J~
,....... - -~----- ---~ - - ------' -.........,-- -~ -.".-..--.-.----
.
i~';tbi:gJ.;J];IJ0*:1 {!;~~~~.~1~;L~;+;.;!~~k ~~fl:,t~'
~~~~!1~0~;iS",~1r~~#~~' ~1
=-"
SoVcft1- E-lEW<iloW
V\i' I I M,e...
11zq W.fHA'iE-N.
cVlTelZ.:J.K1::<:;; MN.
T~.. ?I\1'12!>'J;Y; J"J\~i'-d>~>.JtAL-
.. ~-lZ-OAA\IIt-L.-Ai.J'E.
(l~.a&..____' UtIJQ t.-F!.I;:.e.S,IV\N, SSCI'-f
',";,,-l.J1c..'2i._-"('..c.(:;\
I ~+lf:t-I fVi
z:..-
~-:1
I
I,;
. I
, .
",j
I
.,
------:.1-
'~
;\
.';>
-j:
"
-J/-. ~_.
-----1-_ {'.I
G
.
,~
"
,
. .
---~~---+--
-J,.
.:t
--_..._~.
..,,-,~ii-~~~:?::~'o::::..~~'":"-~:'-":~.'.",,:,,,,~~:-_ .
...- .--....
_'.__~"_'_" ._._no
--------
':""'.')2.~~"~-::-:~:-::=-"=;;'=~'::~-T:=..."""":' _
".~_.
,
_ :J
-;-
~&t~~~~,b~::l;'>
... -"-.. .- ~
: 1:-:';;;,~T'~\;;~~'L~\:,~~It~:~:-~'\"I::;r';;~II,;:Y~:;'I~~
"j,;:rf.!1:J"il~'::ril::i~:5:::1U''''':1-':J-'' 'rLr "'_'.--r,'_tl ~d,..tl:-t'-:i ,,1,'_
.1::' ,-/....,.M~:W~:?.:J.-::;\:.1L;t.:F.h1.:tyr 1)&1--l.Jk~.1~'):-'[ :ili';<~;--p:;'%~'
. :-. ;r!t::?t~'~.\7*~~; . ~(~?i~k?;jg1;~t~~~~~f~t~~~:~r;:;:
t(IN.;Q.~\oJo,.."'-
1._
,
-----=- ~_. ~j
DB> J;UVIfroN ~"~ I f ~
,
-=":-:1.
2--...=-
~\~-t1CN 'I~"I'~
I
"..,..-.-,--,
[\Jaot~ 'I-II>rLL "tjP""Ak~'{._
~r;:;--~,~-_\4;",""-'m'-'5 ""'-r'""'",; ~@
'-~I~~1Jk ~jjDloboo. OOOOD - , 0 .nT
,,"."O'jDPJ'T-H?l.\%----J --- >:,_"'-, I --10-"'- -. --li-o" ----:H.o'" 6N1"1'oL~o'''''
/.. . f'r __.tr:-,.. ---1 .w 2 ~ ~~~t"';"Pd:J2. ClcCJ12. 012- 'N(I\[);:r-NO~1.flI; I
Col'JI'2.cLjCI\'-"i '?3. t, , ..
\ r---u~W"". ""-~::~-;'AAS'o 'Oo-r-iU'-:-~--
1~I[Dloalo-~~=~~pm(jrdlD6IO-or~'=--' ,
~-7~4'C------f_ _. 4~;..,.+--7.-4"--.--I----~:o~'--li,,'
, i J j q. <Z:' J 4K~ ' .
t-:::::--"",. .____:___1i"4.P\.\~l.IN> 'iQ\-\Tf' WA'U- TY:f'II;A\.._.EAY_
-1 '
\\}INOC\).J~ ,s ID)N6 ,TP:\fv\: l~' ':Gft'l-(" e..o\.,oit.
(SN\lo)
AI"-- E>l'ffl."-" ~
. "...... ,....
-x-Ti'us, ~H'ICA-rIO~ j;YS~CI];"-
'-
/r-.: 2:1 '148 WINDOJ.,J DfT1,ll-
z.-\l5'~
-------..._,~
\
,
iI18-~
il~'~~l
lil_' ;~
1'1-'; ~~
i Ii ::J
. i"i, -",, : 1
I)' --.J
". Iljn
! ~rS.1QJ;;\(JAL~j"i I tl
< ~ t-::.-~"gJ:::;-.---:
. 'r
",~1.1 r J,I
>" , /'./'
.,,~, (,.."'-L"",~O~,, <;~ 12.41
'-,', Y'/
n.. \.. j,.
I " 50' ~:;?.t>.N TRuS
b~Sftt.E:r~ W,,"Ptoy
,
j....,
~-'-------
!O)f17~J \".O~T4'0.G. .' !,' ~'~i,
t\tj'.lza"'\Ij>c-.~ _,"
z.-"5~ H..1.S:::uO ';:',
.~~ 5-p.'Q.S
=t'''i PINE- 'f("~\lIJt/w;.-
I<JGIO:tN~uu.."t'~ .
, '~:'i ','
v 1 . "
.iT 10 eu:.. 5C()Q.. i
;' ,Ui3' 1z."c.~c.EN1"-fKI<- all
'-~,,- --~ \"-"" i
!J i
sTD 1'2" 13>1.~
'I - CLHl'oWi'il
"I I
:iT \
--["
"
'"
::c
o
2
-----T
'j
I
I
(
.f'()h1vl_:J:J\F.::,
-~
J,j~. ~fQ(tIN6! ,\ . <0:
""!1-d.'9;:-.tCrJN1"o~J~~.:o. Vo9F~~.lJII\JOOW .J.''''J''\~/
-;"'-O;;\:lCIV\. 0UT:::'11 V+l""'~'
I
!
GI'-I'O"-
cr
..+
"I
41 ,I_It" R;C;: fPc,c
~1'- . "-("BP-bu.JN')
-;1- I
2 i J -s'lsU\e
--.. i
, ,
"
8
.~
IO""I-z..-e<>l.-t'q'a
: r.u.\!..F-,.lN~rS1D.l.tj6;:Tl!P..
, .
r-r
~
~- f"
"
-J
NOTt: I
C1'-~!i C"T fO"--H@IC.At~ DR"'" }<j i ,
[;.; '-&-0 ~--- - '-'1_1
J ' ~"""''''''' ~~~"-' _ ,L..~ ",,--,\..- '" __.
1 " .;, C '\'\1) ""...) ! '~--------~- 11'
....-0 'M~,,"~ _ ~c""- i '1,[ 1- 4"siM<;?'ooC-'
, C ~J5' 1__...__...,.___ I.,. .
~ LA~lt ~----l-b--~ e;.:i'Am~H_-:::: ,l~' 2:~JIA~
--i~
I. . .
2:."'E.JlT1S.':-'I!)~17'~
'0;
-:-j/i'''\.''</-:-<.'' "(/<,:,_/ /
ijcr
/;
Z-4"-f5PelO6\S(iI'O.c:..) w/~" f/hoK
. -;r #..r
#= ", 'r3-~ =
.. ~.J:.../'
?/ i--- :;o"------i
-t'j~ leAl.. \'J""-\-- Oe.1Alc.
OVc~f.\~D O~TA\cS
. ;z/' "'..1 I 3<:A:i,.!::...
WI~Pa\Y;:)-'i' txx)'e- :OE.-rAl~
Z.~Jl5~
)
"
Cl
'"
~
~
~/
/
,
,
,
,
I"~
-- .:::
)
-_:~/
,
'~
1-e>AD.S :
"K...o ~ L.L.
~MF" l:J-.L.
40 p-s.c
z..o p~~
~. L- 't3eA;"'N~ (}.APP-C rry
2.'580 Ptt_
lhllr"byoer'titY1;battb1BJllan.'BP'''::11"1(lBU''h,
lIJ.' report wa." pr"'IlarBd bl' liB Qr "wlBr.,.
dll-Bot BlIpern~lon and tha.t I alii " duly aBdll-
tllr"dPrO:fIlSS101la.lEng1~a-"Und..rtha-l.....ot
tba State otjllnnSBeh.
~!? ~
B1"11l.ll,R. Dobie, P. E.
Date 9....2..4-- Z<<J"Z.. lIBg. lie. 9798
+lO]'l.ITTLB CAHADA ROAD
SUIT:a2'O
SAINT PAUL
)tlNNIlSOTA 5$117
TILl U1_UO.n44
VAX: 61:Z-'''lJO.~2U
Wtp.;1":W t'o~: 1''''t~_:Rq:6,WI-\,\, ,0 I
=eo\-,;.JlkL"'.1
(,.fof',O ~\<E~ lV\!J.5Sdli
0>'- 4&3-",0'1'1, _
S /--I:ftT 3
------
~r<ADIN~, DFi2AINAG:E, AND EP;:;O&ION CON"~~~P~A~
FOR,
F5T5RO&ENTHAI-
ze.a ~OHAvIC ~ANE
,-'NO '-"'K5&, MN ~~"'4
"5'-5, (E>~I! 48.-,899
ViCINITY MAl='
P.II;o,
,"s'
j~ ~
,
L1NO
lAKES
~~
~
"'
~
'"
o
a
o
~
~
~
N
~
.j
907.~"~'~~-'~/
'W
;"
~
..
o
a
o
,:C z
~
.~.. ~
(j) ~,
~t.5
-.., .I'?=-
J:i;;l...' :
'~'I
1 ~E...~~:! .
-,::-,rr:" _
b~<1',.j~
~~;=.~....
~;,:'::"l r....,.~;...
_~c::"
... ~I
~..;.i;::~l.
li:~' 4
UNO LAKES i':".
..."~~,,
X'?"J.ti
.' I
PROPOSED
BUILDING
f.f.EI- '968,0
I
I
I
I
.. 1:
,
-
,F.FX
908_0
'"
:"".1
X~bt
dP...
. -. -.
2Y~"'~'.,:....~.~:1R~_~ASEMENT
____J
""'M
,-
~.".
"X~"~
L1l&.% J
:,'-=_'NFlL~ AReA
906.(1 ~
~l.Q -. --
..,-~:- ,....
","]"
"J....,rn<>:
_.!L""'"--<>-___"
......,--.
..
i
.:=
_..
~"
661.08 N B9'06'44~ W
'. .............. ....
--"-"I~
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
BAFFLE WEIR DETAIL
Ii~OlOION CONmOL. NOTElO .
O\lERFl.OW
._,~I2..___"M__~_
FRrKl"" """....Rn; ;''''~<;A 1~;>Ir'''r"i'T1ni! V-1'-.EPhE
(1) f'IIlOR,lC-~OU!ll< Oii"01"G. "<ST"l~ lilLT SfOP ,E"crs I~ lOC/,;,LON$ St<(J~
"'(\(ljTIC~/it; 5!j.1 SlQf' :fI::~~E~ "'ILl. BE: j,nlU!llfp YM<~[ ..OC~L W'Or.IONS RWUIRl:
_mU~v~lE?Ot<ti'. ,: " " .' . -' '
(1) PROI1P'" NA111ll: ,000SQ;l. SEED. ArK) ...ulCK .lNOICREP 1<11)-< ~ S'lRAIt;Hl
,'. sn OISC l'olfHm 1~ Q.AI'S QF f:N/l.l. CIlAOiN(!., ..' .'
(')lolAIRTIIIN,N-lDR(PAIRSll,'SlWF<l<lCrS{IRCl.UU(l1-<(PD/OVAL,Ol'ACClml1lA,Ell
Sill) URll...'ti:ttTs,T:OH"IS L~lA~uSH(O-
(S) USE M.-.D-OT 5EEO!.!lX 2B~ N-iO/OR JOB-WI' fOilINfll1R~\ION MEA,
AND USE "'<>00, ,<Eu'",~ l&8 ,010 TJ-IE I>eND. .
(6l-;<Er.IOVE:'SEDUo!LNl fM" l~r POND Af'lEfl n;( Sll" UAS,&E:H ST,os,UZEC.
'1;".2..............
-'?'".-(.....~
...".,-"',.-"'~<<..
f........._.""......
:::..,~..::;"'...:-:"'_.
_"""'...............IIob'...."'"
/~~~~:
A~==~-
3!]1! .
TYPICAL SECTION
'o"~
'1;',;.,':ff";f,:--~'f.::-"'......""...,.,"-'''''LLr''''
...lr..1t.<.u......'''',,'''_~...'O''''_.
lOP a~Rl.! 9gS.5
TOP 1Ii:IR 90~.O
10t)-.'YR rEM E~EV 90'.B\
CCNl;REi( Sf'ILLWA'r
~~"~
, UI
15 1}"
m"gO;l.S
",""',,-,,,_.
,.,.,,' "''''''''''''''"
""'''LO'''''''_'
I' i'- 3----1--1L
'~,--._- . -['
t::~~";:::;:Y:'::-':":':'~~iJ 4"
\\.
'- ,.. CONCRETE SUf?fAC(
4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE
......,...,."v.._.._
1rj;~ ~::':~1
'-CR^"Ul^~ f'"lE~ Sl^"'<!:1
(~Er. NOTO
~5^~'t~:.".
~~"":~\""~
,W![ ,,,t <;(,~jl~A(;!CIl A' "'S O>>r,ON IH< SlmS!;l",!
A CHnDli'-~ 'ABR,C. 'i?!C. .}EO; iQl< 1"l G~N--ilJlA"
FlI,Tm a..~"K<l U"'lr~~ 0111[W",S~ ~p(c,m:D III 1,,(
"lANS mr rllilllll: ~"O~LO CO'lfH I~E ""'~' OF THf
r.:,PRA~
';,?:~ ('{f.:C >- >-:;:~ ,.:...,
~~=1'!:r'
t
j
~
~.:.~;;;;r
NORT,.,
~~,."'.'....'.,,\
P'.&~~,~
,'-:.., -
'''.^ ':;,
l..E~ENO
. . CONCRETE WEIR .
OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE
~ 8&6.9
DENOTES [XISTlllG ELEVATION
"""
80101'[$ PRaPOSEO ['lEV;;llOH
(TOP or CURa WHEHE APPliCABLE:)
DENOTES [XIST;NG CONTOUR
lOlL.T FIiNCE
GH.APHIC SCALE
PQNOING CAtCljlA)lONS
AND STORM SEWER DESIGN 'BY
PLOW[ ENGINEERINC;: INC.
SIl<PV.1INJN() ~
PLOH1= ENGWEEl/ING, iI\c.
9'lli1U:~,AVfNUf:.:N.r.."
CfR(;lE:~ MN.".$JW
(78J) 7ll5-",IJ4J
I."~ ct>rlifJ',"I",,!,}1>is pllm ,,m.~~:~.,='Q,- <JMt>r
f7'y ~""I ~~ r1i>d 1~~I.t ~ ~'d.w: u:C~$.d J'r~- '.
I"~_ E'!9'~ ""~ Ih.S~"f Ih~ ~d(~ C/ IHM._",
di/~
f1Alr IO/e.-lIft:? UCE:JiISE. t.Q 41295
. , .-J-5.,~'f ~
t'2-;--
-..______'
._~---~-_:
CERili=ICATIQN
,,, .
. ..
I' HEREav CER1lfY THAT 1j-!IS SURVEY, PLAN OR RER.ORT ~AS P,RE'.PAREO
BY ME,OR UNDER ,l-lY DIRECT SUPIR....IS:ON AND THAT',:AM'A DUl,y", :,.',
R~Gl5TEREO, LAN.Q $UR\lEVlJWONOER. lHE LAI'{S OF. THf, SlATE 'i?f "'~NNE;SOT,A..:.
D[NOTES PROPOSED CO/HOLlR
(lIlFE:!:T)
] \n~ll . ~o Il
DEN01ES DIRttnm. or DRAINAGE
I
I
~
DENOrE5- Sll! FE~lC[/COI'ISTRUCTIC>>: LIMITS
PREF'Ai=:.50 6'r";
E.~_ IOCUO , eONS, INC.
L.AND &uRV5YOR&
S18" L.exINa.rON .c.ve. NE
CIRCL.5 I"IN5&, MN &&"14
TEl- r,rbS) 'eh-S5'Sh FAX. ('63) '86.lf:>o2icz"
NOT!:.5-
- TOPO V!':RlflED IH FIELD BY E.G. RliD AND SO~IS, INC.
/. :' -r'
. ;,t!.-;,_C"J'
',~,~ .': /~j~;~~t-C0-~_::
~kme~oto. Lie: No.
.---......-
~;'~,;:,~ ,:'~
.,.'::""
D9.ti'4?'~'7: CZ-'.'"
lOI-I5ET I Or I
"_1_'",-,'_"'_'_''-''''
.
Noo Yang
29 E. Demont Ave
Little Canada, .MN 55117
~./
,\il< <t''''\jI(V
~ \it" .
Dear Mayor and City Councils
At the November 12th meeting at the Centerville city hall, I approached you City
councils about wanting to establish a business type in the area of a Slaughter Shop. After
a serious consideration, I feel that I am willing to commit and wanted to pursue such
commitment at the location of6867 20m Ave S, a zone which is already declared as EI.
In order to fulfill that commitment r am again requested that you include my name for the
November 27m, 2002 meeting so I can present my agenda to be amend for this type of
business into your ordinance.
I am confident that my strong commitment and a will to succeed as well as my
strong work ethic would make a positive and valuable consideration from the City of
Councils Centerville.
You may contact me at (651) 484-0842. Looking forward to see you again at the
next meeting.
RESPECTFULL Y
./p,
~'~:-_.::""'.l_L/~~
/ . l,
/}/ N9JJ.>>mig-~
~
'.
-~
L__________ _._.
C.AUTIO"': NeT TO Bt' USlD'FOR
IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES.
THIS IS MHMPGRT ANT RECDRD.
SAFEGUARD IT.
w: /Jr;l1V,/~, '- ., 'Ll ,
~-l./t/, .,~:....:!..... -,'../..J
, ANY ALT RATIONS IN SHADED
ARlAS RENDER FORM VOID
c::ERTIFICATE OF RELEASE OR DISCHARGE FROM ACTIVE DUTY
2. DEPARTMENT, COMPONENT AND BRANCH
OSMC-ll
6. R SERVE OBLI . ERM. 0 T
Yea Man Cay
7.b. HOME OF RECORD AT TIME OF ENTRY (Citi: and state or compiete
add,ess if known) 1556 AME S APT D '
T PAUL, MN 55106
B.b. STATION WHERE SEPARATED
HQBN lMARDIV CAMPEN CA 92055RUCl1001
12. RECORD OF SERVICE
a. Date Entered AD This Period
b. Separation Dat~ This Period
c Net Active Service This Period
d_ Total Prior Active 5ervrce
e. Total Prior Inacti....e Service
f. Foreign Service
g. Sea Service
h. Effective Date oT Pay Grade
13. DECORATIONS. MEDAlS, BADGES, CITATIONS AND CAMPAIGN RIBBONS AWARDED OR AUTHORIZED (All pe,iods of service)
GOOD CONDUCT MEDAL (W/3 STARS). NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL. LETTER
APPRECIATION. MERITORIOUS MAST, CERTIFICATE OF COMMENDATION (2).
MERITORIOUS UNIT COMMENDATION. SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON
S. DATE OF BIRTH (YYMMDD)
600Hll
MEPS MINNEAPOLIS, MN
8... LAST DUTY ASSIGNMENT AND MAJOR COMMAND
HQBN IMARDIV CAMPEN CA 92055RUC11001
9. COMMAND TO WHICH TRANSFERRED
N/A
11. PRIMARY SPECIALTY (List number, title and years and months in
specialty. List additional specialty numbers and titles involving
periods of one or morey:ears.)
0231-INTELLIG~NCE SPECIALIST
(05 YEARS, 03 MONTHS)
3531-MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATOR
(02 YEARS, 06 MONTHS)
OF
1ti~NJ~Rv~gra~ (6'15'fR}{lfot'&~c\'6l:1~s, nY5"'W1!'t~~e"fif~ey! INTELLIGENCE SPECIALIST
(08 WEEKS, 03/88), SERGEANTS COURSE (05 WEEKS. 11/94), MOTOR TRANSPORT
OPERATIONS NCO COURSE (04 WEEKS, 07/97). BASIC AIRBORNE COURSE (03 WEEKS.
03/91), INTER TRANS COURSE (04 WEEKS. 09/90)
lS.a. MEMBER CQNTRI9UTEO TO POST.VIETNA.M EllA
VETERANS. EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
-Yes No lS.b. HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATE OR
EQUIVALENT
V" No 16. DAYS ACCRUED LEAVE PAID
DUE
17. MEM8EA WAS PROVIDED COMPlnE DENTAl:.- EXAMfNA.TlON AND. ALL APPROPRIATE DENTAL SERVICES ANO TREATMENT WITHIN. gO DAYS PRIOR TO SEPARATION
k_~..~,
w
If 7' (" -= I'~ -"I III ' \\:"1
~ ~ID \, 17 ' I " I,
..I;-,. If! I Il'~<\ \ \j
",//\ I '\ \
!i 111 TI-' \ lId ~' I.,/~('\) i i //1
\\ \ I /11-_11 ' 'U -1/l ~~J, \, \( I
II I; I 7 /,\ H \,/\ I
'1 I,L- I,. " < ,. '0-../ ^"\. r----<if
I I! 1 d ! I;), r-
I I" r-!f'l [,
I 'I I I \ I
II I I CurrerjIY~9nedll-1 i I
I \ 1 '~Ui i!
I I I I I
I ! 6867 I I I
1- I! I I ~rcle
I! L:]I L II
I I .
I '
I I
I 1
I ,'JI
! I L
r
U
I
!
I,
U
C~ , ;1: 1,~I<:r'- I I
~ "
. P1 -<
!!)J I I l.
1 ," I I i :;;
v i
, '" I I I . '"
It \ - i
I;' !
,
",'/ 11
"'/1 ,
CP,
<e'
~I,
Q'
''- I
Cj/; 1IJ
?::.If
SI! :ll:::
8r1j <
'I
~ I{
- - if -I
- -
- ,
':: I{
il
'I
~::.G..OI.LNr'y i".
, . -- _. - ..yrr-Cj.,! 0
-- --~~t'La. 4"7;,
~, -3 , -- --:........ lhfA,!N
-- _ -- .....D;r0il Z
\ -......-::'..'1..).....
81 I -- -- -::.. -. ___.J~DIC!A'
-- -:"'-'~ Orr
I ~, -- -- --=-~~N.::f.S -I
, --'
" 0I1lL0T 19
~ A -,-
'l~ ,~ ~,
'-' I. "
,<2 IA..
\,~ 0
,1
i
/~
\
'I
\
-,
- )
~'
~~ r
III
:' i
I,
I,
'I
I,
II
I, '
~_.i
.i!
------------:_~)
.
~,
Q' ?~.
+<--
(f //
~/j
fJ::-'<i>~
@/(.
II
Ii
If
"
!;:-/I
'0,/1
00
iSf;
fS/J
"II
';:11
'"
'I
/ -,
.....,.... - ......~"
// '-.'"
, ,
r' <-------
1
-<
i!
o
N
r-~'
I
,
CITY OF
I
,
I
i
I
r
I
i
. i
i
I
I
!
,
I . i
--I
'ltRMfflAL TRANSPORT i
f AIRVIEW STREET
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
111
2 I
I
i
I
I
5/'
L J N 0
>-
I-
(,)
,
!
,I
I
I
i
I
I
J
I
,
I
!
P1
--<3EIJ-AR'-
LAKES
REV/SiDI\
DA TE: . DESCRi
June. ZOOO ZonlnlJ Change!
n-," ?nnn. 7,,",...... r-h..,nn..,
Centennial Fire District
7741 Lake Drive
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
(651) 784-7472 - Office
(651) 784-2427 - Fax
The Centennial Fire District purchased Self Contained
Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) in 1990. These are the units
that provide breathing air to the firefighters when fighting a
fire. We are reaching the end of the useful life of these
units and there are several safety improvements that are
available on the new units available today.
The fire district had set aside $100,000 for 800 MHZ
radios in the capital equipment fund that we will not need
to use. We would like to use $95,000 of the capital
equipment fund to purchase new SCBA units for the Fire
District.
This was presented to the Fire District Steering
Committee on November 14, 2002. Due to no quorum
present, we are asking that each city council approve the
purchase ofthe new SCBA units for a total of$95,000.
~ .
Centennial Fire District
7741 Lake Drive
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
(651) 784-7472 - Office
(651) 784-2427 -Fax
The Centennial Fire District purchased semi-automatic
defibrillators in 1993 and has had good results from their
usage. However, these units are getting old and we are
experiencing some maintenance issues with them. There
have also been significant technology improvements since
we purchased ours.
We have received a donation of$23,000 from the
Centennial Firefighter's Charitable Gambling that will fund
the purchase of 12 new defibrillators and supplies for the
Fire District:
Because we did not have a quorum present at the last
Centennial Fire District Steering Committee meeting, we
are asking for approval from each of the three city councils
to purchase the new defibrillators and supplies for an
amount of $23,000.
J
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
ORDINANCE #74
An Ordinance regulating the use of the City's Right-Of-Ways and the
administration and enforcement of such regulations.
The City Council of the City ofCenterville ordains as follows:
Sec. 1.01.
Election to Manager the Public Right-of-Way.
To provide for the health, safety and welfare of its citizens, and to ensure the integrity of its streets
and the appropriate use of the rights-of-way, the city strives to keep its rights-of-way in a state of
good repair and fee from unnecessary encumbrances.
Pursuant to the authority granted to the city under state and federal statutory, administrative and
common law, the city hereby elects pursuant Minn. Stat. 237.163 Subd. 2(b), to manage right-of-
way within its jurisdictions.
Sec. 1.02.
Definitions.
The following definitions apply in this chapter of this code. References hereafter to "sections" are
unless otherwise specified references to sections in this chapter. Defined terms remain defined terms
whether or not capitalized.
"Abandoned Facility" means a facility no longer in service of physically disconnected from a portion
ofthe operating facility, or from any other facility, that is in use or still carries service. A facility is
not abandoned unless declared so by the right-of-way user.
"Applicant" means any person requesting permission to excavate or obstruct a right-of-way.
"City" means the City ofCenterville, Minnesota. For purposes of section 1.28, city means its elected
officials, officers, employees and agents.
"Commission" means the State Public Utilities Commission.
"Congested Right-of-Way" means a crowded condition in the subsurface of the pubic right-of-way
that occurs when the maximum lateral spacing between existing underground facilities does not
allow for construction new underground facilities without using hand digging to expose the existing
Page 1 ofl2
1----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lateral facilities in conformance with Minn. Statutes, section 216D.04 subdivision 3, over a
continuous length in excess of 500 feet.
"Degradation" means a decrease in the useful life of the right-of-way caused by excavation in or
disturbance of the right-of -way, resulting in the need to reconstruct such right-of-way earlier than
would be required if the excavation or disturbance did not occur.
"Degradation Cost" subject to Minn. Rules 7819.11 00 means the cost to achieve a level of restoration
as determined by the city at tbe time the permit is issued, not to exceed the maximum restoration
shown in plates 1 to 13, set forth in Minn. Rules parts 7819.9900 to 7819.9950.
"Degradation Fee" means the estimated fee established at the time of permitting by the city to recover
costs associated with the decrease in the useful life of the right-of-way caused by the excavation, and
which equals the degradation costs.
"City Inspector" means any person authorized by the city to carry out inspections related to the
provisions of this chapter.
"Delay Penalty" is the penalty imposed as a result of unreasonable delays in right-of-way excavation,
obstruction, patching, or restoration as established by permit.
"Emergency" means a condition that (1) poses a danger to life of health. or of a significant loss of
property; or (2) requires immediate repair or replacement of facilities in order to restore service to a
customer.
"Equipment" means any tangible asset used to install, repair, or maintain facilities in any right-of-
way.
"Excavate" means to dig into or in any way remove or physically disturb or penetrate any part of a
right-of-way.
"Excavation permit" means the permit which, pursuant to this chapter, must be obtained belore a
person may excavate in a right-of-way described in such permit.
"Facility or Facilities" means any tangible asset in the right-of-way required to provide Utility
Service.
"Hole" means an excavation in the right-of-way, with the excavation having length less than the
width of the pavement.
"Management Costs" means the actual costs the city incurs in managing its right-of-way, including
such cost, if incurred, as those associated with registering applicants; issuing processing, and
verifying right-of-way permit applications, inspectingjob sites and restoration projects; maintaining,
supporting, protecting, or moving user facilities during right-of-way work; determining the adequacy
Page 2 of 12
of right-of-way restoration; restoring work inadequately performed after providing notice and the
opportunity to correct the work; and revoking right-of-way permits. Management costs do not
include payment by a telecommunications right-of-way user for the use ofthe right-of-way, the fees
and cost oflitigation relating to the interpretation of Minnesota Session Laws 1997, Chapter 123;
Minn. Statutes Sections 237.162 or 237.163 or any ordinance enacted under those sections, or city
fees and costs related to appeals taken pursuant to Section of this chapter.
"Obstruct" means to place any tangible object in a right-of-way so as to hinder free and open passage
over that or any part of the right-ot:way.
"Obstruction Permit" means the permit which, pursuant to this chapter, must be obtained before a
person may obstruct a right-of-way, allowing the holder to hinder free and open passage over the
specified portion ofthat right-of-way, for the duration specified therein.
"Obstruction Permit Fee" means money paid to the city by a permittee to cover the costs as provided
in Section 1.06.
"Patch or Patching" means a method of pavement replacement that is temporary in nature. A patch
consists of (1) the compaction of the sub-base and aggregate base, and (2) the replacement, in kind of
the existing pavement for a minimum of two feet beyond the edges ofthe excavation in pavement is
included in the city's five-year project plan.
"Pavement" means any type of improved surface that is within the public right-of-way and that is
paved or otherwise constructed with bituminous, concrete, aggregate, or gravel.
"Permit" has the meaning given "right-of-way permit" in Minn. Statutes, section 237.162.
"Permittee" means any person to who~ permit to excavate or obstruct a right-of-way has beelgranted
by the city under this chapter.
"Person" means an individual or entity subject to the laws and rules ofthis state, however organized,
whether public or private, whether domestic or foreign, whether for profit or nonprofit, and whether
natural, corporate, or political.
"Registrant" means any person (1) has or seeks to have its equipment or facilities located in any
right-of-way, or (2) in any way occupies or uses, or seeks to occupy or use, the right-of-way or place
its facilities or equipment in the right-of-way.
"Restore or Restoration" means the process by which an excavated right-of-way and surrounding
area, including pavement and foundation, is returned to the same condition and life expectancy that
existed before excavating.
"Restoration Costs" means the amount of money paid to the city by a permittee to achieve the level
ofrestoration according to plates 1 to 13 of Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Rules.
Page 3 of12
.
"Public Right-of-Way" means the area on, below, or above a public roadway, highway, street, cart-
way, bicycle lane and public side walk in which the city has an interest, including other dedicated
rights-of-way for travel purposes and utility easements ofthe city. A right-of-way does not include
the airwaves above a right-of-way with regard to cellular or other non-wire telecommunications or
broadcast service.
"Right-of- Way" means either the excavation permit or the obstruction permit, or both, depending on
the context, required by this chapter.
"Right-of-Way User" means (1) a telecommunications right-of-way user as defined by Minn.
Statutes, Sec. 237.162, Subd. 4; or (2) a person owning or controlling a facility in the right-of-way
that is used or intended to be used for providing utility service, and who has a right under law,
franchise, or ordinance to use the public right-of-way.
"Service of Utility Service" included (1) those services provided by a public utility as defined in
Miun. Stat. 216B.02, Subd. 4 and 6; (2) services of a telecommunications right-of-way user,
tJ including transporting of voice or da~nformation; (3) services of a cable communications systems
as defined in Minn. Stat. Chapter 238; (4) natural gas or electric energy or telecommunications
services provided by the city; (5) service provided by a cooperative electric association organized
under Minn. Stat., Chapter 308A; and (6) water, sewer, stearn, cooling or heating services.
"Supplementary Application" means an application made to excavate or obstruct more of the right-
of-way than allowed in, or to extend, a permit that had already been issued.
"Temporary Surface" means the compaction of sub-base and aggregate base and replacement, in
kind, of the existing pavement only to the edges of the excavation. It is temporary in nature except
when the replacement is of pavement including in the city's capital improvement plan, and is
scheduled for completion within 2 years, in which case it is considered full restoration.
"Trench" means an excavation in the pavement, with the excavation having a length equal to or
greater that the width of the pavement.
"Telecommunication Right-of-Way User" means a person owning or controlling a facility in the
right-of-way, or seeking to own or control a facility in the right-of-way, that is used.or is intended to
o be used for transporting telecommunication or other voice or datll1nformation. For purposes of this
chapter, cable communication system defined and regulated under Minn. Stat. Chapter 238, and
telecommunication activities related to providing natural gas or electric energy services whether
provided by a public utility as defined in Minn. Stat. Sec. 216B.02, a municipality, an municipal gas
or power agency organized under Minn. Stat. Chapters 453 and 453A, or a cooperative electric
association organized under Minn. Stat. Chap. 308A, are not telecommunications right-of-way users
for purposes of this chapter.
Sec. 1.03.
Permit Requirement.
Page 4 of 12
Subd. 1. Permit Required. Except as otherwise provided in this code, no person may obstruct or
excavate any right-of-way without first having obtained the appropriate permit from the city.
(a) Excavation Permit. An excavation permit is required to excavate that the part of the
right-of-way described in such permit and to hinder free and open passage over the specified
portion of the right-of-way, to the extent and for the duration specified therein. An
obstruction permit is not required if a person already possess a valid excavation permit for
the same project.
(b) Obstruction Permit. An obstruction permit is required to hinder free and open passage
over the specified portion of right-of-way by placing equipment described therein on the
right-of-way, to the extent and for the duration specified therein. An obstruction permit is
not required if a person already possesses a valid excavation permit for the same project.
Subd. 2. Permit Extensions. No person may excavate or obstruct the right-of-way beyond the date
or dates specified in the permit unless such person (i) makes a supplementary application for another
right-of-way permit before the expiration of the initial permit, and (ii) a new permit or permit
extension is granted.
Subd. 3. Delay Penalty. In accordance with Minn. Rule 7819.1000 Subd. 3 and notwithstanding
Subd. 2 ofthis section, the city shan establish and impose a delay penalty for unreasonable delays in
right-of-way excavation, obstruction, patching, or restoration. The delay penalty shan be established
from time to time by city council resolution.
Subd. 4. Permit Display. Permits issued under this chapter shan be conspicuously displayed or
otherwise available at all times at the indicated work site and shall be available for inspection by city.
Sec. 1.04. Permit Applications.
Application for permit shan contain, and will be considered complete only upon compliance with the
requirements of the following provisions:
(a) Submission ofa completed permit application form, including all required attachments,
scaled drawings showing the location and area ofthe proposed project and the location of all
known existing and proposed facilities, and the fonowing information:
(1) Each applicant's name, Gopher One-Can registration certificate number, address
and e-mail address if applicable, and telephone and facsimile numbers.
(2) The name, address and e-mail address, if applicable, and telephone and facsimile
numbers of a local representative. The local representative or designee shan be
available at all times. Current information regarding how to contact the local
representative in an emergency shall be provided at the time of registration.
Page 5 of 12
(3) A certificate of insurance or self-insurance:
(1) Verifying that an insurance policy has been issued to the permittee by an
insurance company licensed to do business in the State of Minnesota, or a
form of self insurance acceptable to the City;
(2) Verifying that the permittee is insured against claims for personal injury,
including death, as well as claims for property damage arising out of the (i)
use and occupancy of the right-of-way by the permittee, its officers, agents,
employees and permittees, and (ii) placement and use of facilities and
equipment in the right-of-way by the permittee, its officers, agents,
employees and permittees, including, but not limited to, protection against
liability arising from completed operations, damage of underground facilities
and co II apse 0 f property;
(3) Naming the city as an additional insured as to whom the coverages
required herein are in force and applicable and for whom defense will be
provided as to all such coverages;
(4) Requiring that the City be notified thirty (30) days in advance of
cancellation of the policy or material modification of coverage term;
(5) Indicating comprehensive liability coverage, automobile liability
coverage, workers compensation and umbrella coverage established by the
city in amounts sufficient to protect the city and the public and to carry out
the purposes and policies of this chapter.
(4) The city may require a copy ofthe actual insurance policies.
(5) lfthe person is a corporation, a copy of the certificate required to be filed lmder
Minn. Stat. 300.06 as recorded and certified to by the Secretary of State.
(6) A copy of the person's order granting a certificate of authority from the Minnesota
Public Utilities Commission or other applicable state or federal agency, where the
person is lawful1y required to have such certificate from said commission or other
state or federal agency.
(b) Payment of money due the city for
(I) permit fees, estimated restoration costs and other management costs,
(2) prior obstructions or excavations;
Page 6 of 12
(3) any undisputed loss, damage, or expense suffered by the city because of
applicant's prior excavations or obstructions of the right-of way or any emergency
actions taken by the city;
(4) franchise fees or other charges, if applicable.
Sec. 1.05. Issuance of permit; conditions.
Subd. 1. Permit Issuance. If the applicant has satisfied the requirements of this chapter, the city
shall issue a permit.
Subd. 2. Conditious. The city may impose reasonable conditions upon the issuance ofthe permit
and the performance ofthe applicant thereunder to protect the health, safety and welfare of the public
or when necessary to protect the right-of-way and its current use.
Sec. 1.06. Permit Fees. (Note: Sample fee schedules included in the appendix)
Subd. 1. Excavation Permit Fee. The city shall establish an excavation permit fee in the amount
sufficient to recover the following costs:
(a) the city management costs.
(b) degradation costs, if applicable.
Subd. 2. Obstruction Permit Fee. The city shall establish the obstruction permit fee and shall be in
an amount sufficient to recover the city management costs.
Subd 3. Payment of Permit Fees. No excavation permit or obstruction permit shall be issued
without payment of excavation or obstruction permit fees. The city may allow applicant to pay such
fees within thirty (30) days of billing.
Subd.4. Non Refundable. Permit fee that were paid for a permit that the city has revoked for a
breach as stated in Sec. 1.14 are not refundable.
Subd. 5. Application to Franchises. Unless otherwise agreed to in franchise, management costs
may be charged separately from and in addition to the franchise fees imposed on a right-of-way user
in the franchise.
Subd.6. All permit fees shall be established consistent with the provisions of Minn. Rule 7819.100.
Sec. 1.07. Right-of-Way Patching and Restoration.
Subd. 1. Timing. The work to be done lU1der the excavation permit, and the patching and
restoration ofthe right-of-way as required herein, must be completed within the dates specified in the
Page 7 of t2
I
I
permit, increased by as many days as work could not de done because of circumstances beyond the
control of the permittee or when work was prohibited as unseasonal or unreasonable under Sec. 1.08.
Subd. 2. Patch aud Restoration. Permittee shall patch its own work. The city may choose either to
have the permittee restore the right-of-way or to restore the right-of-way itself.
(a) City Restoratiou. If the city restores the right-of-way, permittee shall pay the costs
thereof within thirty (30) days of billing. If following such restoration, the pavement settles
due to permittee's improper backfilling, the permittee shall pay to the city, within thirty (30)
days of billing, all costs associated with having to correct the defective work.
(b) Permittee Restoration. If the permittee restores the right-of-way itself, it shall at the
time of application for an excavation permit post a construction performance bond in
accordance with the provisions of Minn. Rules 7819.3000.
(c) Degradatiou Fee in Lieu of Restoration. In lieu of right-of-way itself, it shall at the
time of application for an excavation permit post a construction performance bond in
accordance with the provisions of Minn. Rules 7819.3000.
Subd. 3. Standards. The permittee shall perform patching and restoration according to the
standards and with the materials specified by the city and shall comply with Minn. Rules 7819.1100.
Subd. 4. Duty to Correct Defects. The permittee shall correct defects in patching, or restoration
performed by permittee or its agents. Permittee upon notification from the city, correct all
restoration work to the extent necessary, using the method required by the city. Said work shall be
completed within five (5) calendar days of the receipt of the notice from the city, not including days
during which work cannot be done because of circumstances constituting force majeure or days when
work is prohibited as unseasonaI or unreasonable under Sec. 1.08.
Subd. 5. Failure to Restore. If the permittee fails to restore the right-of-way in the manner and to
the condition required by the city, or fails to satisfactorily and timely complete all restoration
required by the city, the city at its option may do such work. In the event the permittee shall pay the
city, within thirty (30) days of billing, the cost of restoring the right-of-way. If permittee fails to pay
as required, the city may exercise its rights under the construction performance bond.
Sec. 1.08 Supplementary Applications.
Subd. 1. Limitation on Area. A right-of-way is valid only for the area of the right-of-way specified
in the permit. No permittee may do any work outside the area specified in the permit, except as
provided herein. Any permittee which determines that an area greater than that specified in the
permit must be obstructed or excavated must before working in that greater area (i) make application
for a permit extension and pay any additional fees required thereby, and (ii) be granted a new permit
or permit extension.
Page 8 of 12
Subd. 2. Limitation on Dates. A right-of-way permit is valid only for the dates specified in the
permit. No permittee may begin its work before the permit start date or, except as provided herein,
continue working after the end date. If a permittee does not finish the work by the permit end date, it
must apply for a new permit for the additional time it needs, and receive the new permit or an
extension of the old permit before working after the end date of the previous permit. This
supplementary application must be submitted before the permit end date.
Sec. 1.09. Denial of Permit.
The city may deny a permit for failure to meet the requirements and conditions of this chapter of if
the city determines that the denial is necessary to protect the health, safety ofthe public, and welfare
or when necessary to protect the right-of-way and its current use.
Sec. 1.10. Installation Requirements.
The excavation, backfilling, patching and restoration, and all other work performed in the right-of-
way shall be done in conformance with Minn. Rules 7819.1100 and other applicable local
requirements, in so far as they are not inconsistent with the Minn. Stat. Sec. 237.162 and 237.163.
Sec. 1.11. Inspection.
Subd.1. Notice of Completion. When the work under any permit hereunder is completed, the
permittee shall furnish a completion certificate in accordance Minn. Rules 7819.1300.
Subd. 2. Site Inspection. Permittee shall make the work-site available to city personnel and to all
others as authorized by law for inspection at all reasonable times during the execution of and upon
completion of the work.
Subd. 3. Authority of City.
(a) At the time of inspection the city may order the immediate cessation of any work which
poses a serious threat to the life, health, safety or well being of the public.
(b) The city may issue an order to the permittee for any work which does note conform to the
terms ofthe permit or other applicable standards, conditions, or codes. The order shall state
the failure to correct the violation will be cause forrevocation ofthe permit. Within ten (10)
days after issuance of the order, the permittee shall present proof to the city that the violation
has been corrected. If such proof has not been presented with the required time, the city may
revoke the permit pursuant to Sec. 1.14.
If the city becomes aware of an emergency regarding facilities, the city will attempt to
contact the local representative of each facility owner affected, or potentially affected, by the
emergency. In any event, the city may take whatever action it deems necessary to respond to
the emergency, the cost of which shall be borne by the person whose facilities occasioned the
Page 9 of 12
emergency.
Subd. 2. Non-Emergency Situations. Except in an emergency, any person who, without first
having obtained the necessary permit, obstructs or excavates a right-of-way must subsequently obtain
a permit, and as a penalty pay double the normal fee for said permit, pay double all the other fees
required by this code, deposit with the city the fees necessary to correct any damage to the right -of-
way and comply with all of the requirements of this chapter.
Sec. 1.13. Supplementary Notification.
Ifthe obstruction or excavation of the right-of-way begins later or ends sooner that the date given on
the permit, permittee shall notify the city of the accurate information as soon as this information is
known.
Sec. 1.14. Revocation of Permits.
Subd.1. Substantial Breach. The city reserves its right, as provided herein, to revoke anyright-of-
way permit, without a fee refund, ifthere is a substantial breach ofthe terms and conditions of any
statute, ordinance, rule or regulation, or any material condition of the permit. A substantial breach
by permittee shall include, but sha!1 not be limited to, the following:
(a) The violation of any material provision of the right-of-way permit;
(b) An evasion or attempt to evade any material provision of the right-of-way permit, or the
perpetration or attempt to perpetrate any fraud or deceit upon the city or its citizens;
(c) Any material misrepresentation of fact in the application for a right-of-way permit;
(d) The failure to complete the work in a timely manner; unless a permit extension is
obtained; or
(e) The failure to correct, in a timely manner, work that does not conform to a condition
indicated on an order issued pursuant to' Sec. 1.07.
Subd. 2. Written Notice of Breach. If the city determines that the permittee has committed a
substantial breach of a term or condition of any statute, ordinance, rule, regulation or any condition
of the permit the city shall make a written demand upon the permittee to remedy such violation. The
demand shall state that continued violations may be caused for revocation of the permit. A
substantial breach, as stated above, will allow the city, at its discretion, to place additional orrevised
conditions on the permit to mitigate and remedy the breach.
Subd. 3. Response to Notice of Breach. Within twenty-four (24) hours of receiving notification of
the breach, permittee shall provide the city with a plan, acceptable to the city, that will cure the
breach. Permittee's failure to so contact the city, or the permittee's failure to submit an acceptable
Page 10 of 12
plan, or permittee's failure to reasonable implement the approved plan, shall be cause for immediate
revocation of the permit.
Subd. 4. Reimbursement of City Costs. If a permit is revoked, the permittee shall also reimburse
the city for the city's reasonable costs, including restoration costs and the costs of collection and
reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in connection with such revocation.
Sec. 1.15. Mappiug Data.
Subd. 1. Information Reqnired. Each permittee shall provide mapping information required by the
city in accordance with Minn. Rules 7819.4000 and 7819.4100.
Sec. 1.16. Location of Facilities.
Subd. 1. Placement, locations, and relocation of facilities must comply with the act, with other
applicable law, and with Minn. Rules 7819.3100, 7819.5000 and 7819.5100, to the extent the rules
do not limit authority otherwise available to cities. (Note: Cities wishing to require the under
groundiug of utilities should adopt the separate under grounding ordiuance included with
appendix).
Subd. 2. Corridors. The city may assign specific corridors within the right-of-way, or any particular
segment thereof as may be necessary, for each type of facilities that is or, pursuant to current
technology, the city expects will someday be located within the right-of-way. All excavation,
obstruction, or other permits issued by the city involving the installation or replacement of facilities
shall designate the proper corridor for the facilities at issue.
Subd. 3. Limitation of Space. To protect health, safety, and welfare or when necessary to protect
the right-of-way and its current use, the city shall have the power to prohibit or city shall strive to the
extent possible to accommodate all existing and potential users of the right-of-way, but shall be
guided primarily by considerations of the public interest, the public's needs for the particular Utility
Service, the condition of the right-of-way, the time of year with respect to essential utilities, the
protection of existing facilities in the right-ot:way, and future city plans for public improvements and
development projects which have been determined to be in the public interest.
Sec. 1.17. Damage to Other Facilities.
When the city does work in the right-of-way and finds it necessary to maintain, support, or move
facilities to protect it, the city shall notify the local representative as early as is reasonably possible
and placed as required. The costs associated therewith will be billed to that facility owner and must
be paid within thirty (30) days from the date of billing. Each facility owner shall be responsible for
the cost of repairing any facilities in the right-of-way which it or its facilities damages. Each facility
owner shall be responsible for the cost of repairing any damage to the facilities of another caused
during the city's response to an emergency occasioned by that owner's facilities.
Page Ilofl2
Sec. 1.18. Right-of-Way Vacation.
Subd. 1. Reservation of Right. If the city vacates a right-of-way which contains facilities, the
owner's rights in the vacated right-of-way are governed by Minn. Rules 7819.3200.
Sec. 1.19. Indemnificatiou and Liability.
By applying for and accepting a permit under this chapter, a permittee agrees to defend and
indemnify the city in accordance with the provisions of Minn. Rules 7819.1250.
Sec. 1.20 Abandoned Facilities.
Subd.3. Removal of Abandoned Facilities. Any person who has abandoned facilities in any right-
of-way shall remove them from that right-of-way ifrequired in conjunction with other right-of-way
repair, excavation, or constmction, unless this requirement is waived by the city.
Sec. 1.21. Appeal.
a) A right-of-way user that: (1) has been denied registration; (2) has been denied a permit; (3)
has had permit revoked; or (4) believes that the fees imposed are invalid, may have the
denial, revocation, or fee imposition reviewed, upon written request, by the city council. The
city council shall act on a timely written request at its next regularly scheduled meeting. A
decision by the city council affirming the denial, revocation, or fee imposition will be in
writing and supported by written findings establishing the reasonableness of the decision.
Sec. 1.22. Reservation of Regulatory and Police Powel's.
A permittee's rights are subject to the regulatory and police powers ofthe city to adopt and enforce
general ordinances necessary to protect the health, safety and welfare ofthe public.
See 1.23. Effective Date.
The effective date of this Ordinance shall be after its passage and publication according to law.
Adopted by the Centerville City Council this _, day of
,2002.
Mayor, Tim Swedberg &'~
, J jiP
City Clerk, Teresa Bender J t(}()
. tL}l~ ,,".1
F;fjUJ~fn~
~ Page 12 of 12
Kim
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Peterson, Tom W [tpeterson@bonestroo.com]
Monday, November 25, 2002 1 :33 PM
Kim Moore Sykes (E-mail)
Council Meeting 11/27/02
Hi Kim,
I have the Council Agenda in front of me and was wondering if there is anything you need
in writing from me since I will not be there Wednesday night.
Pete Rosenthal site plan review: I looked at this a while back and do not have any
comments.
Quebec Street drainage: I talked to Teresa about this. Since the last Council meeting,
we have not had a chance to survey the back yards. We plan to do this soon and I will
then have a better idea if there is sufficient grade to extend the storm sewer all the way
up the lot line. This work, if approved, would be done in the spring. It could be added
to the Buckbee project, which would likely result in better prices. After bids are
received, we could accept or reject the work.
Consent Agenda- Northdale Construction Pay Request for $37,651.92: This is the 6th and
final for Hunters Crossing. All work is complete and the project accepted.
Tom Peterson
Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates
651-604-4868
651-636-1311 (fax)
tpeterson@bonestroo~com
1
.
MEMO
DATE:
November 21, 2002
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
Mary Capra
North Metro Telecommunications Commission
I...........................................................................
Please find attached information regarding building a new build for North Metro
Telecommunications.
Actions To Be Taken:
. The Cable Commission is looking for a consensus from the city councils
regarding the building of a new building for North Metro. This consensus
is requested in an effort to move forward with the revision of the joint
powers agreement for the franchises.
Future Actions For Consideration:
. If the consensus of the cities is to build a new building a resolution to
change the joint powers agreement between the cities to allow the
franchise to own property will be forwarded to the city for approval.
Currently based on the joint powers agreement the franchise is not
allowed to purchase property.
.
NORTH METRO TELECOMMUNCIATIONS COMMISSION MEMO
TO: CABLE COMMISSION
FROM: HEIDI ARNSON
SUBJECT: MEDIA CENTER FACILITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT REPORT
DATE: 11/18/2002
At the November 13'" Executive Committee meeting, it was requested that I produce a report
outlining the reasons for building a new Media Center, the requirements of the facility, and the
steps that would be necessary to move forward with such a proposal. This report is to be used
to educate each of your city councils regarding the issues surrounding the possible construction
of a new Media Center.
As it was not possible to prepare the report in time for the mailing of the packet, it was
requested that the report be hand delivered, upon its completion, so it can be discussed at the
November 20'" Cable Commission meeting.
North Metro Telecommunications Commission !Media Center
Facility Needs Assessment Summary
Organizational Background
The North Metro Telecommunications Commission is a Joint Powers Organization
representing the cities of Blaine, Centerville, Circle Pines, Ham Lake, Lexington, Lino
Lakes, and Spring Lake Park in matters concerning cable television franchising, franchise
enforcement, cable television regulation, and the operation of the community media
center. The organization's official legal status is that of a governmental entity.
The cable company (AT&T Broadband) is required to pay an annual franchise fee equal
to 5% of gross revenue. The franchise fee is used by the cities to fund the Commission's
budget, with the remainder heing dedicated toward each city's cable related expenses.
The Media Center is funded through a monthly fee on subscriber's cable bills. Annual
grants from the Cable Commission budget are also a source of funding for the Media
Center.
Each of the seven member cities has recently approved a new fifteen year franchise with
AT&T Broadband. This franchise includes requiring the continued support of the Media
Center via the PEG fee, and the continued payment of a 5% franchise fee on gross
revenue.
Current Situation
The Media Center and Commission Offices are currently renting space, on a month to
month lease, at 1630 IOlst Avenue NE in Blaine. The studio and office space is poorly
designed, in need of significant repairs, and has become inadequate in size for the number
of staff and general public utilizing the facility.
Recently, during the formal franchise renewal process, consultants were hired to perform
a facility needs assessment. Their findings verified the above conclusion. According to
their report:
· The shape and size of the two studios limit their usefulness
· Since both studios share the same control room, it is impossible to do
simultaneous staff and public productions, resulting in scheduling problems
. Inadequate lighting capabilities and the inability to offer decent back lighting and
effects lighting makes adequately lit program production very difficult
· Size of studios limits the variety, storage and configuration of sets available for
use
· Current office space does not provide for future growth in either production areas
or staffing levels
. No private conference area
P.l
. Inadequate equipment storage space
. Inability to expand production capabilities as a result of inadequate equipment
storage space
. Public edit suite is too small to conduct classes with more than three people
. No separate tape duplication area, therefore tying up edit suite for dubbing
purposes
. No garage for production van and fleet vehicle
. No routing system for video or audio through facility
. No sprinkler system in facility
. The physical condition of the current building is poor, and quite possibly
unhealthy due to frequent roof leakage problems
The consultants recommended the following changes:
. Expand studio space by a total of 1,945 square feet
. Expand current public and staff edit suites by a total of 648 square feet
. Expand office and utility space by approximately 235 square feet
. Add a second control room at 196 square feet
. Add set storage at 144 square feet
. Add a green room at 120 square feet
. Add a beginning edit suite at 324 square feet
. Add equipment storage at 400 square feet
. Add a garage for two vehicles at approximately 1500 square feet
. Modify conference room
. Modify master control
. Modify tech shop
Taken all together the additional square footage recommended for a new facility over the
existing space would be approximately 4,200 square feet for a total square footage of
10,500 square feet
Development considerations for new space
Additional considerations for a new facility include:
. Sufficient parking and loading/unloading space
. Proximity to other institutions that might utilize community television
. Within 1,500 feet of the existing institutional network infrastructure
. Acoustically acceptable location
. An area free of relatively strong RF signals (radio station transmitters)
. Costs of building or buying in particular areas
. Cost to design and modify space
. Ceiling height of at least 15 to 24 feet
. Large empty spaces of at least 40 by 40 feet
P.2
. Large bay doors
. Wide doorways and hallways for equipment and set movement
. Raised floors or communications raceways in floors or ceilings for cabling
. Acoustically acceptable interior space for studios and edit suites
. ADA accessibility
. Wide easy access from garage area to studio
. High quality communications infrastructure within building for computer
network, phones, video production equipment
. Electrical system capable of handling necessary power load
. Availability of generator and backup power within building
. Space and appropriate zoning for wireless communications, including satellite
downlinks as well as potential microwave antenna placement
. An HV AC system capable of handling heat dissipation/cooling required for video
production equipment.
. Appropriate fire suppression systems geared toward electrical fires
. General attractiveness of building to general public
The following quote is taken from the consultant's report: "It is important to note, that
based on: the amount of space that needs to be added; the amount of remodeling that
needs to be done; the condition of the current facility; and the space available at the
current site, we have determined thus far that it would likely be cost prohibitive to expand
the current facility as compared to building or purchasing a new, larger facility
altogether..... . Finally, we feel that in designing a new facility, staff and other users will
have the advantage of being able to create a facility that more exactly meets their needs
now and in the future."
Moving Forward
A decision regarding whether and where to build a new facility must be made relatively
quickly for several reasons:
. The cable company must bring the community channels to the new facility via the
institutional network. Upgrading the network is scheduled to be done, but thc
design of the system will be greatly affected by the location of the new facility.
. We will only have the 15-year franchise term available to pay off the loan, and the
franchise term will begin on November 22, 2002.
. Our current facility could, at any time, become unavailable to us for future use.
. Make a Decision
The Cable Commission, the Operations Committee (made up of the city managers of
the seven cities) and Media Center staff, believe that owning a facility by the end of
the 15 -year franchise term makes the most financial sense for the organization. While
franchise fees and PEG fees are guaranteed for the 15 year term of the current/new
franchise, it would be difficult, if not impossible, to predict what the funding scenario
will be in any new franchise term. Owning a facility outright, at the end of the
P.3
,-
current 15-year franchise will greatly reduce the operational overhead of the Media
Center, making financial survival of the organization through alternate funding
scenarios more probable.
. Select a Site
The Media Center will be a very valuable asset to any community. (Obviously,
wherever it is located it will be owned by all seven cities.) If we are to build a new
facility if would be most beneficial to locate it in an area frequented by the general
public, convenient to reach, and most importantly for us, as close to the current I-Net
infrastructure as possible. This means that the most suitable locations would be very
near a city hall or school. It would also be most cost effective for the organization to
have the land donated. Understanding that this scenario is very unlikely, we would
look for the most reasonable deal.
. Take Steps to Allow the Commission to own Real Estate
The current Joint Powers Agreement requires that the Commission get prior
authorization from the cities to purchase real estate. The Quad Cities Cable
Communications Corp. recently went through the process of changing their Joint
Powers Agreement to allow them to issue revenue bonds for the purchase of property
and the construction of a new facility. They also modified the process for a Member
City to withdraw from the Joint Powers Commission, that would allow the Member
City to retain any equity that may have accumulated in the building, while also
ensuring that any withdrawing Municipality remained responsible for its
proportionate share of any remaining bond debt. The Commission attorney is in the
process of writing that resolution for us. I have, however, attached a copy of the
Quad Cities resolution to serve as an example. Our resolution will be very similar.
. Do RFP for Media Center Architect
We already have a very good idea of what our space needs are, based on the facility
needs assessment already performed by our consultants. As the City of Coon Rapids,
the Quad Cities Cable Commission, and the Northern Dakota County Community
Television Corporation have just recently built new studios we have the benefit of
examining their experiences with architects. As the Media Center design will
determine the cost of the facility, and therefore, the funding required to build it, we
should waste no time in locating and hiring an architect.
. Obtain Funding
Media Center staff have been working with Paul Donna, previously of Juran &
Moody, but now at Northland Securities, to develop a payment scenario. The original
plan was based on a 15-year repayment schedule. Mr. Donna is currently developing
a 14-year payment plan. The Media Center facility would be paid for through
revenue bonds. The collateral for these bonds would be the 5% franchise fee
guaranteed in the current AT&T Broadband franchise document. To better
demonstrate the loan repayment scenario, I have attached the 15-year payment and
bonding qualification information provided, as an example, by Mr. Donna. It was
noted by Mr. Donna, at our November 13th Commission Executive Committee
P.4
meeting, that it is an excellent time to borrow money because of the very low interest
rates.
The Risks
There is one primary risk to be aware of in the whole "new Media Center" scenario.
That is the source of the collateral. As has been demonstrated, that collateral is the
5% franchise fee on AT&T Broadband gross revenue, paid to the Member Cities for
use of their rights-of-way, to deliver cable services. The Cities have a I5-year
franchise that requires the company to pay this amount. Circumstances that could
impact that payment include the earnings of the cable industry, and state and federal
law governing local Municipalities ability to charge franchise fees for use of their
rights-of-way. While the Franchise document guarantees the franchise fee payment,
and it could be argued that those entities with such an agreement are exempt from
changes in law until the end of that agreement term, there exists the possibility that
the funding source could change or be eliminated. In this scenario, the Cities could
choose to continue payments on the facility, or sell the property. All seven Cities
would be responsible their portion of debt on the new facility. (Dependent on
percentage of subscriber income for each City.)
Conclusion
This is a very important decision for the Cable Commission and Member Cities.
Something must be done about a Media Center facility. Our current facility is
inadequate to meet our actual needs and has absolutely no growth potential. It makes
the most long-term financial sense for the Cities to own a facility outright. Both the
City of Coon Rapids and Quad Cities Cable Commission recently reached the same
conclusion and took the steps necessary to accomplish their goal. The
communications needs, of the Cities and our citizens, is not going to diminish. We
have the opportunity to develop the infrastructure necessary to provide these
important services for the long-term. It is my hope that the Cities will see fit to move
forward with the building of a new Community Media Center.
Attachments:
a. CBG Communications Facility Needs Assessment Analysis (relevant portion
of report.)
b. Example Joint Powers Agreement modification resolution
c. Northland Securities Revenue Bonding qualifying and repayment scenario
P.5
DRAFT
3/29/02
too knowledgeable on technical issues. The video engineer should be able to
train staff on dealing with public producers' technical issues. The public
producers also said that there Is a significantwalt before broken equipment gets
fixed. Again, the new engineer should be able to address this problem, as well.
It is important to note, though, that with the amount of work projected for the
video engineer, it may be necessary to add part-time or full time technicians in
the future in order to assist the engineer. This potential should be factored into
long-range hiring plans for the Media Center.
Facility Improvements
We believe It is necessary to focus on a facility, as well as equipment, upgrade
path for the Media Center. As an example, the Media Center does not currently
have an appropriate routing system throughout the facility. The facility is currently'
. only wired with composite video and analog audio. We believe there is a need
for a comprehensive routing system throughout the facility for both video and
. audio. A routing system provides the ability to send a video/audio signal from
one source in the facility to any other source in the facility. For example, there
could be video footage or a graphic that is created in one of the edit suites that Is
needed for a production in the control room. With a routing system, a producer
could simply designate what source he or she wants the signal from and obtain it
electronically from that source for use in the control room. Another example, as
described earlier, Is the NMMC's current situation of having to physically lay
North Metro Media Center Narrative
CBG Communications, Inc. 06!?'if02
P.6
Page 33 of 47
DRAFT
3/29/02
cables across the hallway to record camera feeds onto DVCPro decks. With a
routing system, staff could simply route the camera sources to a DVCPro
recorder without having to lay the cables across the hallway.
Initially, as the Media Center continues to migrate from analog to digital
equipment and formats, the Center's cabling should at least be upgraded to YC
video to facilitate proper Jransport of S-VHS and DVCPro signals. However,
overall quality levels In the industry are changing to a cabling standard consistent
with SOl (Serial Digital), and the Media Center should consider upgrading to SDI
as a long-term goal.
Specifically, SOl enables signals to be routed and processed with no
generational loss. Its ability to facilitate transport from source to source without
any loss in quality (sometimes known as "Iossless video") would be of great
benefit to'the overall technical quality of future programs developed at the
NMMC. Additionally, equipment incorporating SOl technology is more stable in
performance than traditional analog components, which ultimately means
increased operational reliability and less maintenance.
Conceming various areas within the facility, we have recommended space and
other enhancements throughout the preceding narrative, especially for the studio
and editing room areas. Additionally, based on our findings, certain new service
North Metro Media Center Narrative
CBG Communications, Inc. 061?F;J02
P.7
Page 34 of 47
DRAFT
3/29/02
areas will need to be implemented and commensurate additional square footage
added. In a few cases, we've recommended reducing the size of certain areas,
based on projected requirements. The list below summarizes all those areas and
the space adjustments needed for each.
Facility Expansion Summary
It is important to note that, based on: the amount of space that needs to be
added; the amount of remodeling that needs to be done; the condition of the
current facility; and the space available at the current site, we have determined
thus far that it would likely be cost prohibitive to expand the current facility as
compared to building or purchasing a new, larger facility altogether. Also, it is
quite a bit easier, and therefore less expensive, to add wiring for the routing
system during new construction than to retrofit it to the current facility. Finally,
we feel that in designing a new facility, staff and other users will have the
advantage of being abie to create a facility that more exactly meets their needs
now and in the future. . As the plans for necessary facility changes are made, we
recommend space be modified, added or expanded for the functional areas
described below:
Expand Studio Space:
The Public Studio is oddly shaped, making It difficult to use effectively.
The Staff Studio needs to be enlarged to handle multiple sets.
North Metro Media Center Narrative
CBG Communications, Inc. Of/?"I02
P.8
Page 35 of 47
DRAFT
3/29/02
Approximate space to be added: 810 square feet for the Public Studio
and 935 square feet for the Staff Studio := 1,945 square feet. New total
square footage for both studios := 3,000 square feet.
Expand Staff Edit and Public/S-VHS Edit Space
Both have been identified as being too smail for more than two persons
to work side by side simultaneously and house equipment effectively.
Approximate space to be added: 240 square feet for the Public Edit and
125 square feet for the Staff Edit = 365 additional square feet. New
total square footage for both edit suites = 648 square feet
Expand Office Space
Additional office space is needed for new personnel. Additional hallway
and closet space wiil also be needed to support the additional office
space.
Approximate size to be added: 235 square feet.
New total square footage for office functions = 3,305 square feet
(includes offices, hallways, restrooms, closets, lobby and lunch room)
CBG Communications, Inc.
North Metro Media Center Narrative
06/'"lC:102
P.9 .
Page 36 of 47
L
DRAFT
3/29/02
Add a Second Control Room
To address increased production needs and reduce bottlenecks.
Approximate size required: 14 feet x 14 feet ~ 196 square feet
Add Set Storage
Needed for mobility, flexibility and security of sets reiated to the
operation of both studios.
Approximate size required: 12 feet x 12 feet = 144 square feet
Add a Green Room
Identified as necessary for talent to prepare themselves for live or taped
programs. This is further discussed in the new facility summary.
Approximate size required: 10 feet x 12 feet::: 120 square feet
Add a Beginning Edit Suite
Appropriate for entry-level users to better learn and apply video editing
techniques.
Approximate size required: 18 feet x 18 feet::: 324 square feet
CBG Communications, Inc.
North Metro Media Center Narrative
0f'/?'i/!)2
P.10
Page 37 of 47
L
ro', "
"";;.,C.
DRAFT
3/29/02
Add Equipment Storage
Necessary to store equipment in a safe and secure location. Also, the
equipment currently stored in the Tech Shop, which has served to
clutter up the workspace in that area, could be relocated to this new
storage room, which would not only reduce clutter but could also help
reduce the necessary size of the Tech Shop.
Approximate size required: 20 feet x 20 feet = 400 square feet
Add a Garage for NMMC Vehicles
In order to provide shelter and security for the vehicles and their
equipment
Approximate size required: 30 feet x 35 feet = 1,050 square feet
Modify the Conference Room
The Conference Room must be located differently than today, such that
it wiii provide space for uninterrupted meetings and private discussions.
If properly located, it could be reduced in size from its current 310
square feet to 225 square feet ( a 15' x 15' room)
North Metro Media Center Narrative
06,.,J;m2
P.ll
Page 38 of 47
CBG Communications, Inc.
DRAFT
3129102
Modify Master Control
Even with the addition of a dub area, the current 675 square foot Master
Control room is larger than necessary to meet projected requirements.
Accordingly, it could be reduced to 20 feet x 25 feet, or 500 square feet.
Modify the Tech Shop
If stored equipment is relocated to the recommended new storage area,
the Tech Shop space could be reduced from its current 420 square feet
to a 15 feet x 20 feet room (300 square feet).
Taken all together, the additional square footage required in a new facility over
the existing facility space would be approximately 4,200 square feet for a total
facility square footage of 10,500 square feet. The final capital cost of the
expanded portion of a new facility would be approximately $525,000, based on a
cost of $125 per square foot. (It is important to note that this does not include
land or operating costs.) Some recent production facility construction we are
aware of ranged up to $150 per square foot. Actual cost per square foot prices
will vary depending on the cost of labor and materials within the North Metro
area at the time of construction.
North Metro Media Center Narrative
CBG Communications, Inc. Df\/?"/~2
P.12
Page 39 of 47
DRAFT
3/29/02
New Facility Summary
I
I
I
As indicated above, we believe that the most cost effective option in the
future to meet current and projected facility needs will likely be for the
Commission to build or acquire a new facility. The following is a list of
development considerations for the Commission to use in reviewing the
nature, type, location, functions and capabilities that are needed
concerning a new facility in order to facilitate a desired level of
programming in the future.
Physical Location of the Production Facility
. Is there a sufficient amount of available parking and
loading/unloading space?
. Is it near any other facilities that might promote close proximity
use by persons that will be involved in video production?
. Is the prospective location near an existing or easily provisioned
point of interconnection to the A T& T I-Net or fiber backbone that
would provide.a high quality signal upstream to the headend?
. Is the site in an acoustically acceptable area where the noise of
the outside environment (such as a nearby superhighway,
railroad tracks, airline traffic, truck loading area, construction
CBG Communications, Inc.
North Metro Media Center Narrative
Oe;-)'</1)2
P.13
Page 40 of 47
DRAFT
3/29/02
site, etc.) would not provide a constant source of sound
interference?
. Is the site in an area relatively free of strong RF signals such
that these types of signals (from a radio station transmitter,
public safety wireless dispatch site, etc.) would not pose an
interference problem from signal ingress into the facility cabling?
Building Characteristics
. Where space would be leased, what is the cost of leasing the
necessary space to establish a production facility at a particular
location, compared to other locations being reviewed and
available funds for the lease of space?
. What is the cost of designing, or modifying the space where
needed, to facilitate studio, post production, field equipment,
storage, administrative and garage operations?
. Are current or planned ceilings high enough to place studio
facilities within the structure (15 to 24 feet high)? Are large
spaces (i.e., 40 feet by 40 feet) available?
. Is there space for a general administrative/reception area?
. Is there large bay door accessibility to the projected studio
area?
CBG Communications, Inc.
North Metro Media Center Narrative
0"1'>1';/'12
P.14
Page 41 of 47
DRAFT
3/29/02
. Is there additional high ceiling space behind lockable bay doors
or a lockable cage to provide storage for studio sets?
. What is the availability of large freight elevators, if the garage or
loading area is underground or if some facilities would be
located on a second f100l-?
. Are there wider doorways and hallways where production and
post production work would take place?
. In the area where master control may be located, are there
raised floors or communications raceways in the floor or ceiling?
. Is the inside space for the studio and audio booth acoustically
acceptable or would a significant amount of baffling and other
modifications need to be implemented?
. Is the building ADA accessible such that appropriate ramps,
elevators, bathroom modifications, etc. have been made?
. Is there wide, easy access, from the garage or loading area to
the projected studio area?
. Is there a high quality communications infrastructure within the
building (Le., does the space incorporate telephone, data,
coaxial, fiber and other necessary cabling)?
CBG Communications, Inc.
North Metro Media Center Narrative'
OP'r'Jt:/'J2
P.lS
Page 42 of 47
L__ _ _ _
DRAFT
3/29/02
. Is the electrical system capable of handling the power load of
the lighting/production/post production/transmission, etc.
equipment planned?
. Is there availability of both generator and battery backup power
within the building?
. Is there space available and the appropriate zoning for the
installation of wireless communications, including satellite
downlinks as well as potential microwave antenna placement?
. Is the HVAC system capable of handling the heat
dissipation/cooling required for a large amount of video
production equipment (Master control/post production/etc. must
typically be cooled to 650 - 680 F)?
. Are there appropriate fire suppression systems (geared around
extinguishing electrical fires without catastrophic damage to
unaffected equipment)?
. Is the building attractive, such that it would make a good first
impression on visitors to the facility?
Facility Development
. Once real estate, basic building and/or lease costs are
accounted for, then interior development/renovation/remodeling/
CBG Communications, inc.
North Metro Media Center Narrative
Of"""1~2
P.16
Page 43 of 47
I
-~-- -- -- -- -- -- --
DRAFT
3/29/02
leasehold improvement/etc. cost (at potentially $125 per square
foot or morel-need to be factored in.
. The costs noted above need to cover finalization of space for:
Reception
Office
Master control/playback/tape duplication
Editing/post production (potentially 3 editing suites)
Field/Remote equipment storage
Set and other storage
Studios
Studio Control Rooms
Tech shop
Network equipment room
Garage
. The Studio Control rooms should be adjacent to their respective
studios. Master Control will incorporate the playback
operations. If duplication is also done in this area, then the
duplication area needs to be separated from the playback
operations.
CBG Communications. Inc.
North Metro Media Center Narrative
Of",)~/1)2
P.17
Page 44 of 47
DRAFT
3/29/02
. Each Studio needs to be large enough for multiple sets and
configurations. Each should include the following key
considerations:
Room for operation of up to 4 cameras
Lighting grid with capability to light multiple sets
Sound isolation
Enough electrical capacity to support a lighting grid with
dimmers
- Adequate HVAC to support both the Studio and the
Contra) Room
Each should also be supported by adequate room for set storage
and a "Green Room" for guests to prepare to be televised
. Raised flooring and conduits (raceways) need to be installed in
various places throughout the facility, including the Edit Suites
and Master Control Room.
. Adequate space for archived tapes and new tape stock will be
needed.
North Metro Media Center Narrative
CBG Communications, Inc. . OFI~~1f)2
P.18
Page 45 of 47
DRAFT
3/29/02
The square footage required to replace the existing facility would be
approximately 6,300 square feet. Added together with the 4,200 square
feet of space needed for facility expansion, this means that the total cost
of the new facility construction (10,500 square feet) would be
approximately $1,312,500, based on a cost of $125 per square foot and
not including land and operating costs. Again, it should be noted that
actual cost per square foot prices will vary depending on the labor and
material costs in the North Metro area at the time of construction.
Conclusion
In summary, the recommendations herein for equipment and facility upgrades,
additions, enhancements and modifications, combined with the replacement
schedule shown in the accompanying equipment matrix, should provide for a
highly satisfactory production facility environment to meet the community access
needs of the North Metro area now and well into the future. The following
summary shows what the total capitai costs would be.
Recommendation - Build or acquire a new facility and replace, update and
enhance equipment.
CBG Communications, Inc.
North Metro Media Center Narrative
Of""~/02
P.19
Page 46 of 47
US TREASURY NIB T 4 11/15/12
Mid Li
911 PerJod
Chart T!Jpe
101-10
n e for
J Da i 1 y
Mid Line
Govt
( 3.84/84) BGN
GY
@14:42
M -
ItOV 1 n
Averages
1) News
23
01
I
I
i
.''''5
!
i
I
i
__ .u"uuu ~,_,
I
I
I
f'
,
I
I
i
-'--T"
08 15 22 01 08
Oct Nov
Germany 49 69 920410
Copyright 2002 Bloomberg L.P.
G660-305-2 13-Nov-02 14;44:41
Isld
ighon OS/14/02
verage
ow on 10/09/02
BGN/NY/Mld
3.839
5.278
4.3696
3.569
,
,
"'f" -
,
,
,
,
,
"__ - - - - _.. oj _ _ _..._ _...... ..
,
,
,
15 22 03 10 17 24
2002 Mav Jun
Australia 61 2 9777 8600
Hong Kong 852 2977 6000 Japan
01
08 15 22
Jul
Brazil 5511
81 3 3201 8900
01
08
15
Aua
22
02
09 16
Sea
20 7330
212 318
7500
2000
3048 4500 Europe 44
Singapore 65 212 1000 U.S. 1
I Bloomberg
HOfESSI....NAL
P.23
101-10+ 1101-11+
n e for -
Monthly
Ask Line
Govt
( 3.84/84) BGN
GY
@14:45
US TREASURY NIB T 4 11/15/12
Ask L
Period
Chart T
leld
igh on 09/30/81
verage
won09!30j02
,
'.
BGN/NY/Ask
3.893
15.84
B.117B
3.594
1) News
rlov i n
Aver-aoes
"1"'.
,
,
,
"1--,--,-
,
,
,
,
,
'--1
,
,
,
,
,
.,-
,
,
,
,
"
,
,
c.
"
,
,
..1__.
,
,
,
._:__....i..
,
,
,
,
_'-__I.
,
,
,
,
,
--I'
,
;---".'--'-'
"
'r
"
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
- - - _1- _ _ _ _
,
,
,
,
,
-1-- _ -., _,_
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
~ - - j.
,
1971-1975
Austra 1 ia
Hong Kong
1976-1980
61 2 9777 8600
852 2977 6000 Japan 81
1981-1985
Brazil 5511
3 3201 8900
1986.1990 1991.1995
3048 4500 Europe 44 20 7330 7500
Singapore 65 212 1000 U.S. 1 212 318 2000
1996-2000 2001-2003
Germany 49 69 920410
Copyright 2002 Bloomberg L.P.
6660-305-2 13-Nov-02 14:45:24
I Bloomberg
PIO~lnSIOH.AL
P.24
$1,745,000.00
North Metro Telecommunications Commission
Cable Franchise Revenue Bonds of 2003
(Not Bank Qualified)
PROJECT SUMMARY
Dated 02/01/2003
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Par Amount of Bands. '''u ............................ . ......... ..,..........
Interest Earnings on Project Construction Fund.... ............................
TOTAL SOURCES...............
USES OF FUNDS
Total Underwriter's Discount (2.800%)....... .... .................................
Costs of Issuance..........................,.. .......n..".... ............ .....n..........
Deposit to Debt Service Reserve Fund (DSRF) ................,...............
Deposit to Project Construction Fund.. ................. .......nm...............
Rounding Amount.................. ........... ........ .........un ....n .........
TOTAL USES......................
FLOW OF FUNDS DETAIL
State and Local Government Series (SLGS) rates for .......................
Date of OMP Candidates...........,............ ..................................___
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION FUND SOLUTION METHOD .............
Total Cost of Investments........... ."......... ....................".......... .......
lnterest Earnings @ 1.700% ............. ". ......,...... ......................".....
TOTAL DRAWS ........................ ......... ............................... ............
DEBT SERVICE RESERVE FUND SOLUTION METHOD ...............
Total Cost of Investments..........,.......... ...................................
Interest Earnings @ 3.9280/0 ................... ........ ..................,.............
Transfers to Debt Service Fund......... ...... .. ....m..........".... .............
TOTAL DRAWS... ........ ......... ... ............ .......... .............. ..... ....... ... ...
BOND STATISTICS
Average Life"................ ".
Average Coupon...............
Net Interest Cost {NIC)................... ......................
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes.......... ......"no......... ............... .....
True Interest Cost (TIC}.......... .......................".... ............................
All Inclusive Cost (AIC)................... ............ ............................. .......
Preliminary
Delivered 02/01/2003
$1.745,000.00
5,576.12
$1,750.576.12
48,860.00
23,000.00
168,772.50
1,505,576.12
4,367.50
$1,750,576.12
Gross Funded
$1,500,000.00
5,576.12
$1,500,000.00
Gross Funded
$168,772.50
96,833.34
(96,833.34)
$168,772.50
8.788 Years
4.9052331%
5.2238507%
4.8573376%
5.2745486%
5.4770445%
Northland Securjfies
Public Finance Group
File = QCTV.sf-Norfh Me/ro Cabie Revenue Bond 15 - Not 50-Land & Building
11/13/2002 2:41 PM
P ,"
P.25
Preliminary
$1,735,000.00
North Metro Telecommunications Commission
Cable Franchise Revenue Bonds of 2003
(Not Bank Qualified)
NET DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
Date Principal Coupon Interest T atal P+I DSR Net New DIS FISCAL TOTAL
2/0112003 - - - - - - -
12/0112003 100,000.00 2.700% 64,841.67 164,641.67 - 164,841.67 164,841.67
610112004 - - 37,555.00 37,555.00 - 37,555.00 -
12/0112004 90,000.00 3.000% 37,555.00 127,555.00 - 127,555.00 165,110.00
610112005 - - 36,205.00 36,205.00 - 36,205.00 -
1210112005 90,000.00 3.300% 36,205.00 126,205.00 - 126,205.00 162,410.00
610112006 - - 34,720.00 34,720.00 - 34,720.00 -
12/0112006 95,000.00 3.600% 34,720.00 129,720.00 - 129,720.00 164,440.00
610112007 - - 33,010.00 33,010.00 33,010.00 -
12/0112007 100,000.00 3.900% 33,010.00 133,010.00 - 133,010.00 166,020.00
610112008 - - 31,060.00 31,060.00 - 31,060.00 -
12/0112008 105,000.00 4.100% 31,060.00 136,000.00 - 136,000.00 167,120.00
610112009 - - 28,907.50 28,907.50 - 28,907.50 -
12/0112009 105,000.00 4.350% 28,907.50 133,907.50 - 133,907.50 162,815.00
610112010 - - 26,623.75 26,623.75 - 26,623.75 -
12/0112010 110,000.00 4.500% 26,623.75 136,623.75 136,623.75 163,247.50
610112011 - - 24,148.75 24,148.75 - 24,148.75 -
12/0112011 115,000.00 4.600% 24,148.75 139,148.75 - 139,148.75 163,297.50
610112012 - - 21,503.75 21,503.75 - 21,503.75 -
12/0112012 120,000.00 4.800% 21,503.75 141,503.75 - 141,503.75 163,007.50
6/0112013 - - 18,623.75 18,623.75 - 18,623.75 -
12/0112013 125,000.00 5.000% 18,623.75 143,623.75 - 143,623.75 162,247.50
610112014 - - 15,498.75 15,498.75 - 15,498.75 -
12/0112014 135,000.00 5.150% 15,498.75 150,498.75 - 150,498.75 165,997.50
6/0112015 - - 12,022.50 12,022.50 - 12,022.50 -
12/0112015 140,000.00 5.300% 12,022.50 152,022.50 - 152,022.50 164,045.00
610112016 - - 8,312.50 8,312.50 - 8,312.50
12101/2016 150,000.00 5.400% 8,312.50 158,312.50 - 158,312.50 166,625.00
6/0112017 - - 4,262.50 4,262.50 - 4,262.50 -
12/0112017 155,000.00 5.500% 4,262.50 159,262.50 (167,120.00) (7,857.50) (3,595.00)
Total 1,735,000.00 - 729,749.17 2,464,749.17 (167,120.00) 2,297,629.17 -
Northland Securities
Public Finance Group
File = Cabl€; Commis.sions.SF-Norlh Metro Cable Revenue Bond 15 - PreJim~Land & Building
11/2212002 8:35 AM
Page 1
Preliminary
$1,745,000.00
North Metro Telecommunications Commission
Cable Franchise Revenue Bonds of 2003
(Not Bank Qualified)
REVENUE SUMMARY
DATE Franchise Fees TOTAL
2/01/2003 - -
2/01/2004 458,000.00 458,000.00
2/01/2005 458,000.00 458,000.00
2/01/2006 458,000.00 458,000.00
2/01/2007 458,000.00 458,000.00
2/01/2008 458,000.00 458,000.00
2/01/2009 458,000.00 458,000.00
2/01/2010 458,000.00 458,000.00
2/01/2011 458,000.00 458,000.00
2101/2012 458,000.00 458,000.00
2/01/2013 458,000.00 458,000.00
2/01/2014 458,000.00 458,000.00
2/0112015 458,000.00 458,000.00
2101/2016 458,000.00 458,000.00
2/01/2017 458,000.00 458,000.00
210112018 458,000.00 458,000.00
Total 6,870,000.00 6.870,000.00
Northland Securities
Public Finance Group
File;:; QCTV.sf-North Metm Cable Revenue Bond 15 - No! BO-Land & Building
11/13/2002 2:41 PM
P::lfH;> 17
P.27
Preliminary
$1,745,000.00
North Metro Telecommunications Commission
Cable Franchise Revenue Bonds of 2003
. (Not Bank Qualified)
COVERAGE RATIO
Date Total Revenues T atal D/S Coverage
2/01/2003 - - -
2/01/2004 470,748.96 168.470.00 2.7942599x
2101/2005 465,172.84 166.040.00 2.8015709x
2101/2006 465,172.84 168,340.00 2.7632936x
2/01/2007 465,172.84 165,205.00 2.8157310x
2/01/2008 465,172.84 166,785.00 2.7890568x
2/01/2009 465,172.84 167,885.00 2.7707826x
2/01/2010 465,172.84 163,580.00 2.8437024x
2101/2011 465,172.84 164,012.50 2.8362036x
210112012 465,172.84 164,062.50 2.8353392x
2101/2013 465,172.84 168,772.50 2.7562123x
2/01/2014 465,172.84 167,772.50 2.7726406x
2/01/2015 465,172.84 166,272.50 2.7976535x
2/01/2016 465,172.84 164,320.00 2.8308961x
2/01/2017 461,586.42 166,900.00 2.7656466x
2/01/2018 626,772.50 168,800.00 3.7131072x
Total 7,141,181.96 2,497,217.50 -
Northland Securities
Public Finance Group
File = QCTV.sf-North Metro Cable Revenue Bond 15 - Not BO-Land & Building
11/1312002 2:41 PM
p"''''''''' -1q
P,28
'1
:ii)tervi[{e
:'7-i-;_,_\
'Esta6(isfiea 1857
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
1380 Main Street '. Centervi((e, M'II[ 55038
(651) 429-3232 "';Ja;c (651) 429-8629
RESOLUTION #02 - 058
CONSIDERATION OF ASSESSING AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE FOR A 3rd
OFFENSE VIOLATION OF ORDINANCE #66 - TOM THUMB FOOD MARKET
(STORE #295)
THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Centerville met on November 13, 2002, at
City Hall; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of CenterviIle has been notified by the
Centennial Lakes Police Department that Tom Thumb Food Market (Store #295) recently
failed their Compliance Check for the year 2002 and upon further research, also failed
their 2001 & 2000 Compliance Check; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Centerville has accepted the Police Chief's
recommendation not to renew Tom Thumb Food Market's (Store #295) tobacco license
for the year 2003; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Centerville discussed and considered
assessing an administrative fine for violations of Ordinance #66, The Sale of Tobacco and
the non-renewal of their license for the upcoming year of 2003; and
NOW, THEREFORE LET IF BE RESOLVED THAT THE CITY OF
CENTERVILLE, imposes an administrative fine of $750.00 on Tom Thumb Food
Markets for the aforementioned Ordinance Violation and takes action not to renew their
submitted tobacco renewal license application for the year 2003.
Passed by the City Council of the City ofCenterville this 13th day of November, 2002.
Mayor Tim Swedberg
ATTEST:
Kim Moore-Sykes, City Administrator
.
Ul
Jtervi{{e
'EstaE{islied 1857
1880,MaLtS/Teet '" Centervi[[e, %'J{ 55038
(651) 429.3232 ,,'fa:( (651) 429-8629
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
RESOLUTION #02 - 061
CONSIDERATION OF ASSESSING AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE FOR A 2ND
OFFENSE VIOLATION OF ORDINANCE #66 - KELLY'S KORNER
THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLVES:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City ofCentelViIle met on November 13, 2002, at
City Hall; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of CentelVille has been notified by the
Centennial Lakes Police Department that Kelly's Korner recently failed their Compliance
Check for the year 2002; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Centerville discussed and considered
assessing an administrative fine for violations of Ordinance #66, The Sale of Tobacco;
and
NOW, THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT THE CITY OF
CENTERVlLLE, imposes an administrative fine of $500.00 on Kelly's Korner for the
aforementioned Ordinance Violation.
Passed by the City Council of the City ofCentelVille this 13th day of November, 2002.
Mayor Tim Swedberg
ATTEST:
City Clerk:, Teresa Bender
.
tJtervi{[e
'Esta6(isned 1857
1880 Jv[ain 5 treet ~ Centervi[[e, 1vtA[ 5_'>038
(651) 429-3232 ~:Fa!( (651) 429-8629
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
RESOLUTION #02-059
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FOR WATER
MAIN TRUNK COSTS FOR THE CSAH 14 WATER MAIN PROJECT
WHEREAS, the CSAH 14 Water Main Project (616-01-123) has been completed at a
total cost of$197,619; and,
WHEREAS, the city engineer has calculated the city's share of the project to be $41,760
for trunk (over -sizing) costs, with the remaining costs to be assessed to the benefited
property owners.
NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED that the City Finance Director is
hereby authorized and directed to transfer funds in the amount of$41,760 from the Water
Fund to the CSAH 14 Water Main Project Fund.
Passed by the City Council of the City ofCenterville this 27flt day of November,
2002.
Mayor, Tim Swedberg
ATTEST
City Clerk, Teresa Bender
tervi[[e
'Esta6(ished JJJS7
C'ENr'E'RYlil'E aTy CO'U:NClL
Staff Report
CSAH 14 Water Main Fund Transfer
Date:
November 27, 2002
To:
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Ms. Kim Moore-Sykes, City Administrator
From:
Ellen Paulseth, Finance Director
Re:
Transfer City's share of CSAH 14 Water Main
.........................................................................
The city engineer has calculated the city's (trunk) costs for the CSAH 14 Water Main
Project (attached). A transfer should be made from the Water Fund as follows:
Water $41,760
CSAH 14 Water Main
(to transfer city share of water main project)
$41,760
Oct 02 2002 11:35AM BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK 6516361311
p.3
CENTERViLLE
C8AH 14 WalerMaln Assessments
816-01-123
October 2, 2002
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS:
$197,619
City Costs (Trunk): 12" HOPE Vo. 6" PVC
2700 LF x ($39.00 - $28,00)
Gate Valves; 12" G V vs 6" GV
2 aa x ($2,300,00 - $1,500.00)
$29,700
Sub Total
1,600
$31.300
ReoonstructManhole at Waterworks:
0,35)( $10,000
Indirect Cosls (20%)
TOTAL CITY' COST:
TOTAL ASSESSABLE COST:
$197,619-41,760
Opt:onl:
Option 2:
Option 3:
Option 4:
, Sub Total
$3,500
$34,800
$6.960
$41,760
$155,859
POSSISLE ASSESSMENT OPTIONS
Developer. 50% $77,929.50
Remainder $77,929.50/18 unit. $4,329 aa ...;
Rich Defoe: 8 x $4,329 $34,635
Developer 10 units, Defoe 8 units
$155,859/28 un~. $5,566 aa
Devalop,w: 10 x $5,566 $55,664
Rich Defoe: 8 x $5,566 $44,531
Waterwork.s Fiat Fee $25,000
$155,859 - $25,000 $130,859
$130,859128 unite $4,873 ea
Develope" lOx $4,673 $46,735
Rich Defoe: 8)( $4,573 $37,388 ($62,388 Total)
Waterworks Flat Fee $20,000
$155,859 - $20,000 $135,859
$135,000/26 units $4,852 ea
Oe'/eloper: 10 x $4,852 $48,520
Rich Deioe: 8 x $4,852 $38,817 ($58,817 Total)
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Kim Stephan, EDC Staff Liaison
November 22, 2002
Economic Development Committee's Request for Funds
New Resident Packet
The Economic Development Committee has been working with the Parks &
Recreation Committee to update the New Resident Packet. Parks & Recreation has
contributed a Trail & Sidewalk Map which has been updated by Bonestroo and
current digital pictures of local parks and trails. The cost of the update to the map
by Bonestroo was just the cost of the draftsman's time, at probably an hour. Mr.
Peterson talked to the Sales Manager, Tim Hewitt at Impressions Incorporated,
which printed the previous packet to determine what electronic format they would
require the map to be in and supplied the disk to myself, along with current copies
of the map. This map was also put on the new web site under About
CentervillelParks & Recreation.
The previous New Resident Packet was delivered in March of 2000. There were
500 folders ordered at that time at $5.03 each, totaling $2,515. There was also a
prep charge of $1,400 bringing the total to $3,915. There are approximately 75
packets remaining and we have been using 10-20 per month. Impressions,
Incorporated has all the original artwork on file. The Sales Manager, Tim Hewitt
said th~ir charges have not gone up so the price would be approximately the same.
EDC would like to place the order and use $2,000 of their remaining $2,786.41 to
put a down payment on the packets, with the balance to be paid from the 2003
EDC budget.
SNO BIZ 2003
The Economic Development Committee has also been planning SNO BIZ 2003 for
Friday, February 7 and Saturday, February 8. Chairperson Betsy Scheller has met
with the Parks & Recreation to involve them in this community event. Parks &
Recreation is planning a Skate Night on Friday, February 7, at Laurie LaMotte
Park with a bonfire, hot chocolate and popcorn. EDC is supplying horse drawn
10f2
hayrides from the Bunker Stables. Events are also planned for Saturday, some
details are not yet confirmed. The Centervilie Lions are holding their annual
fishing contest, the Quad Area Chamber of Commerce is tentatively planning an
event, and EDC is asking Wargo Nature Center to be involved. The Economic
Development Committee would like to request the balance of their remaining
funds (after a $2000.00 down payment for the New Resident Packets) of $700.00
to be available for SNO BIZ. Currently Chairperson Scheller is requesting
$100.00 tor a down payment on the horse drawn hayride.
The Economic Development Committee has not had a quorum for the last four (4)
monthly meetings so they are unable to vote to make a recommendation to council.
EDC would like to request as a consensus of the group members who attended the
November 12,2002 EDC meeting that the funds remaining in their 2002 budget be
allocated to the New Resident Packet at $2,000.00 and SNO BIZ 2003 at $700.00.
20f2
,
tervi[[e
'Esta6(ishci( 1&,7
UPDA TE
Disbursements. Receipts. & Payroll
$160,000
$140,000
$120,000
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
0-
November II through November 27, 2002
Receipts
Disbursements
Payroll (11-21-02)
$107,888.36
$155,489.14
$10,155.28
III Disbursements . Receipts
D Payroll
L________ _, u _, _, _, _, _ _ _
AmQunt
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Cash Receipts
November 11 through November 22,2002
Tran
Dat9 Refer Comments
Batch
Name
,
1112210212:12 PM
Page 1
Account Oeser
FUND 101 GENERAL FUND
Act Type G
$0.50
$13.50
$1,500.00
$0.50
$0.50
$0.50
$0.50
$8.33
$0.50
$0.50
$0.30
$0.50
$0.50
$0.50
$0.50
$0.50
$1.50
$45.37
$25.00
$0.50
$6.00
$0.50
$0.50
$0.50
$0.50
Act $1,608.70
Act Typo R
$20.00
$514.56
$100.00
$2.00
$80.00
$20.00
$8.00
$100.50
$100.00
$100.00
$90.00
$350.00
$336.00
$92,968.00
$8.00
$2,754.00
$104.:10
$1,755.77
$110.00
$20.00
$100.00
$110.00
$20.00
$100.00
$20.00
$110.00
$75.00
$25.00
1111312002
11/13/2002
11/1312002
11/13/2002
11113/2002
11/13/2002
11/1312002
11!1312002
11113/2002
11/13/2002
1111912002
11(19/2002
11/19/2002
11J19J2002
1111912002
11/19/2002
1111912002
11/20/2002
11120lZ002
11/21/2002
11/21/2002
1112112002
11/22/2002
.11 (22/2002
11/22/2002
11/13/2002
11/1312002
11 !13!2002
11/13/2002
11/13/2002
11113/2002
11/1312002
11/13/2002
11113J2002
11/1312002
11/13/2002
"11/15/2002
11/19/2002
11/1912002
11/19/2002
11119/2002
11/19/2002
1111912002
11 !19/2002
1111912002
11119/2002
11J19J2002
11119/2002
1111912002
11120/2002
11/2112002
11/2112002
11121/2002
o 1747 DUPRE RD - M02-085 11-13'()2-1
o 7228 UNITY AVE - 02-186 11-13-02-1
06987 PORTAGE WAY - SOD 11-13-02-1
06806 GROUSE HOLLOW - M 11-13-02-1
o 1616 HUNTER'S TRL - M02- 11-13-02-1
06884 BEAVER POND WAY - 11-13-02-1
01654 HUNTER'S TRL- M02- 11-13-02-1
o UB UR Receipt Group 01 RE 111302UT
o 1787 DUPRE RD - P02.()55 11-13-02-1
01787 DUPRE RD - M02.084 11-13-02-1
01787 DUPRE RD - C02-103 11-19-02
01654 HUNTER'S TRAil - CO 11-19-02
o 17470JIBWAYDR-M02-08 11-19-02
07192 MilL RD. M02-088 11-19-02
o 17450JIBWAYDR-M02-08 11-19-02
o l753DUPRERD-M02-089 11.19-02
o 1548 PELTIER LAKE DR-O 11-19-02
o UB UR Receipt Group 01 RE 11-19-02ul
o US UR Receipt Group 01 RE 11-20-02ut
o 1741 DUPRE RD - C02-104 11-21-02
o 6858 MEADOW COURT - 02 11-21-02
01741 DUPRE RD - P02-056 11-21-02
G 17440JI8WAYDR-C02-10 112202
o 1761 DUPRE RD . M02-090 112202
017420JIBWAYDR-C02-10 112202
01747 DUPRE RD - M02-085 11-13.02-1
o 7228UNITYAVE.02-188 11-13-02-1
o 1616 HUNTER'S TRl - M02- 11-13-02-1
o COPIES 11-13-02-1
01787 DUPRE RD -M02-0B4 11-13-02-1
06806 GROUSE HOLLOW - M 11-13-02-1
o DOG TAG # 1841970 MAIN 11-13-02-1
o OVER PAID 11-'13-02-1
01654 HUNTER'S TRL - M02- 11-13-02-1
o 6864 BEAVER POND WAY- 11-13-02-,
o 1787DUPRERD-P02-055 11-13-02-,
o LOT SPLIT & VARANCE RE 11-15-02
o SUBSIDIZE ELECTION JUD 11-19-02
02002 STATE FIRE AID 11-19-02
o DOG TAG # 187-2002-2003 11-19-02
o LIQUOR LICENSE APPL. FE 1'1-19-02
o 1548 PELTIER LAKE DR-O 11-19-02
o OCTOBER 2002 FINES & FE 11-19-02
01787 DUPRE RD - C02-103 11-19-02
07192 MILL RD - M02-088 11-19-02
o 1745 OJIBWAY OR - M02-0B 11-19-02
o 1654 HUNTER'S TRAIL - CO 11-19-02
o 1753 DUPRE RD - M02-089 11-19-02
o 1747 OJIBWAY DR - M02-08 11-19-02
07184 MilL ROAD - 23 3122 11-20-02
01741 DUPRE RD - C02-104 11-21-02
o Ga58 MEADOW COURT - 02 11-21-02
07018 EAGLE TRAil - OPC02 11-21-02
G 101-24502 Mach. Permit Surcharge
G 101-24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge
G 101-24505 Sod Escrow
G 101~24502 Mech. Permit Surcharge
G 101-24502 Meeh. Permit Surcharge
G 101-24502 Mech. Permit Surcharge
G 101-24502 Mech. Permit Surcharge
G 101-11500 Accounts Receivable
G 101-24501 Plmbing Permit SUfcharg
G 101-24502 Mech. Permit Surcharge
G 101-24503 Else. Permit Surcharge
G 101-24503 Elec, Permit Surcharge
G 101-24502 Mach. Permit Surcharge
G 101-24502 Mech. Permlt Surcharge
G 101-24502 Mech. Permit Surcharge
G 101-24502 Meet!. Permit Surcharge
G 101~24500 Bldg. Permit Surcharge
G 101-11500 Accounts Receivable
G 101-11500 Accounts Receivable
G 101-24503 EJec. Permit Surcharge
G 101-24500 Bldg, Pennlt Surcharge
G 101~24501 Plmb\ng Permit Surcharg
G 101~24S03 Elec. Permit Surcharge
G 101-24502 Mectl. Permit Surcharge
G 101.24503 Else. Permit Surcharge
R 101.32210 BuildingfMech. Penn its
R 101-:32210 Building/Mech. Permits
R 101-32210 Building/Mech. Permits
R 101+34105 Sale of Maps and PUblicat
R 101-32210 BuildingfMech. Permits
R 101-32.2.10 Building/Mech. Permits
R 101~3220a Anima! Licenses
R 101-32210 BulldlngjMech. Permits
R 101-32210 BuildingiMech. Permits
R 101-322.10 BuHdingfMecrl. Permits
R 101-32180 Plumbing Permits
R 101-32215 Zoning Fees
R 101-36270 RefundsiReirnbursements
R 101-33406 Fire Relief Aid
R 101-32210 BuildingfMech. Penni\s
R 101-32100 RentalJUquor Licenses
R 101-:32210 Building!Mech. Permits
R 101~35000 Fines and Forfeits
R 101.32225 Electrical Inspection
R 101-32210 Building/Mech, Permits
R 101-32210 Build\ngfMech. Pennits
R i01~32225 Electrical Inspection
R 101-32210 BulldingiMech. Permits
R 101-32210 BujjdlnglMech. Permits
R 101<>4107 Assessment Search Fees
R 101-32210 8uildlng!Mech. Permits
R 101-32210 8uilding/Mecl1. Pennits
R 10'1-32225 Electrical Inspection
"
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
11/22/02 12:12 PM
Page 2
Cash Receipts
November 11 through November 22. 2002
Amount
Tran
Date Refer Comments
Batch
Name
Account Oeser
$65,00
$130.44
$110.00
$100.00
$110.00
$100,616.57
11/2112002
11/21/2002
11/22/2002
11 i22f2002
1112212002
o 1741 DUPRE RD - 1'02-056
o REIMBURSE FOR PHONE
o 1744 OJIBWAY DR - C02-10
o 1761 DUPRE RD - M02-090
o 1742 OJIBWAY DR - C02-10
11-21-02
11-21-02
112202
112202
112202
R 101-32180 Plumbing Permits
R 101-36270 RefundsiReimbursements
R 101-32225 Electrical Inspection
R 101-32210 BulldingiMech. Permits
R 101-32225 Electrical Inspection
Act
FUND 10 $102,225.27
FUND 325 ELEM WATER MAIN EXT DEBT SERV
Act Type R
$811,97 11/19/2002 01759MAINSTREET-PIN# 11-19-02
Act $811,97
R 325-36100 Special Assessments
FUND 32 $811.97
FUND 415 STORM WATER IMP PROJECTS
Acl Type R
$0.90 11112/2002 o U8 Receipt Serv Pen 10 DR 11-12-02ul R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu
$9,00 11/12/2002 o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F 11-12-02ul R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu
$3.42 11/13/2002 o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 DR 111302UT R 41S~32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu
$31.58 11113/2002 o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F 111302UT R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage fu
$0.90 11/13/2002 o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 DR 11-13-02UT R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu
$9.00 11113/2002 o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F 11-13-02UT R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu
$8.19 11/15/2002 o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F 111402ul R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu
$0.81 11/15/2002 o U8 Receipt SeN Pen 10 DR 111402ut R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu
$23.77 11120/2002 o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAJN F 11-20-02ul R 415~32350 Stonn Water Drainage fu
$2.52 11/2012002 o UB Rece'lpt Serv Pen 10 DR 11-20-02ll1 R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu
$46.09 11/2012002 o US Receipt Serv 10 DRAIN F 1'-19-02ut R 415~32350 Storm Water Drainage fu
$4.70 1112012002 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 10 DR 11.19-02ut R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage fu
$6.00 11121/2002 o US Receipl Serv 10 DRAIN F 1'-21-02UT R 415-32350 Stann Water Drainage Fu
$0.60 11/21/2002 o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 DR 11-21-02UT R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu
$10.85 11/22/2002 o US Receipl Serv 10 DRAIN F 112202111 R415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu
$1.09 11/22/2002 o US Receipt Serv Pen 10 DR 112202ul R 415-32350 Storm Water Drainage Fu
Act $159.42
FUND41 $159.42
FUND 601 WATER FUND
Act Type G
$41.11 11/13/2002 o US Receipt Surc 1 SALES T 111302UT G 601~20800 State Safes & Use Tax
$1.11 11/2012002 o UB Receipt Sure 1 SALES T 11-19-Q2ut G 601-20800 State Sales & Use Tax
Act $42,22
Act Type R
$5.21 11/12/2002 o US Recelpl Serv 30 WATER 1'-12-02ul R 601 ~34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee
$93.50 11/12/2002 o US Receipl Serv 1 WATER 11~12~02ut R 601-37100 Water Sales
$9.35 1111212002 o U8 Receipt Serv Pen 1 WAT 1'-'2-02ut R 601-37100 Water Sales
$0.52 11/12/2002 o US Receipt Serv Pen 30 WA "-12-02ll1 R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee
$259,98 11113/2002 o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 111302UT R 601-37100 Water Sales
$0.27 11/1312002 o US Receipt Serv Pen 30 WA 111302UT R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee
$2.58 11/1312002 o US Receipt seo130 WATER 111302UT R 601~34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee
$57.49 1111312002 o US Receipt Serv Pen 15 WA 111302UT R 601-37100 Waler Sales
$9.35 11/13/2002 o US Receipt serv Pen 1 WAT 11-13-02UT R 501~37100 Water Sales
$574.91 11113/2002 o US Receipl Serv 15 WATER 111302UT R 601~37100 Water Sales
L _
,
"'
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
11/22/0212:12 PM
Page 3
Cash Receipts
November 11 through November 22, 2002
Tran Batch
Amount Date Refer Comments Name Account Oeser
$28.02 11/13/2002 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 1 WAT 111302UT R 601-37100 Water Sales
$93.50 11/13/2002 o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER "-13-02UT R 601-37100 Water Sales
$0.52 1111312002 o US Receipt Serv Pen 30 W A 11-13-02UT R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee
$5.21 11/13/2002 o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER "-13-02UT R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee
$49.45 11/15i2002 o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 111402ut R 601-37100 Water Sales
$4.95 11/15/2002 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 1 W AT 111402ut R 60',-37100 Water Sales
$3.23 11/20/2002 o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 11-19~02ut R 601-34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee
$16.85 11/20/2002 o US Receipt Serv 15 WATER 11-19-02ut R 601-37100 Water Sales
$1.69 11 i20/2002 o US Receipt SaN Pen 15 WA 11-19-02ut R 601-37100 Water Sales
$25.96 11 120/2002 o US Receipt Serv Pen 1 VII A T 11-19-02ut R 601-37100 Water Sales
$23,03 11/20/2002 o UB Receipt SeN Pen') WAT 11-20-02ul R 601-37100 Water Sales
$3.18 11/2012002 o US Receipt Serv 30 WATER 1'-20-02ul R 601 ~34400 Safe Drinking Water Fee
$0.33 11/20/2002 o US Receipt Serv Pen 30 WA 11-19H02ut R 601-34400 Safe Orinking Water Fee
$243.41 11 i20i2002 o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 11 ~ AI 9d02ut R 601-37100 Water Sales
$0.32 " 1/20/2002 o US Receipt Serv Pen 30 WA 11-20-02ut R 601-34400 Safe Drinkjng Water Fee
$230.32 1; 120/2002 o US Receipt Serv 1 WATER 11-20-02"t R 601-37100 Water Sales
$15.13 11/2112002 o US Receipt Serv Pen 1 WA T 11-21-02UT R 601-3-1100 Water Sales
$151.30 11/21/2002 o US Receipt Serv' 1 WATER 11-21-02UT R 601-37100 Water Sales
Act $1,909.56
FUND 60 $1,951.78
FUND 602 SEWER FUND
Act Type R
$14.70 11112/2002 o US Receipt Serv Pen 6 SEW 1'-12-02ul R 602-37200 Sewer Sales
$147.00 11/12/2002 o UB Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 11-12-02ut R 602~37200 Sewer Sales
$51.69 11/13/2002 o US Receipt Serv Pen 6 SEW 111302UT R 602.37200 Sewer Sales
$147.00 11/13/2002 o US Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 11-13-02UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales
$14.70 11/13;2002 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 6 SEW 11-13-02UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales
$471.29 11113/2002 o UB Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 111302UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales
$89.09 11/13!2002 o UB Receipt Serv 18 SEWER 111302UT R 802-37200 Sewer Sales
$8.91 11/13/2002 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 18 SE 111302UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales
$13.35 11/1512002 o US Receipt Serv Pen 6 SEW 111402ul R 602-37200 Sewer Sales
$133.65 11/1512002 o U8 Receipt SeN 6 SEWER 11140211t R 602-37200 Sewer Sales
$24.46 11/20/2002 o US Receipt Serv Pen 18 SE 11-19-02ut R 602N37200 Sewer Sales
$57,13 11120/2002 o US Receipt Serv Pen 6 SEW 1'-19-02ut R 602N37200 Sewer Sales
$55720 11/20/2002 o US Receipl Serv 6 SEWER 11-i9-02ut R 602-37200 Sewer Sales
$417.35 11 i20/20D2 o UB Receipt $erv 6 SEWER 11-20-02ut R 602-37200 Sewer Sales
$44.96 11/20/2002 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 6 SEW 1"I-20-02ul R 602-37200 Sewer Sales
$244.58 11120/2002 o US Receipt Serv 18 SEWER 1'-'9-02ut R 602-37200 Sewer Sales
$98.00 11/21/2002 o US Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 1'-21-02UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales
$9.80 11/21/2002 o UB Receipt Serv Pen 6 SEW 11-21-02UT R 602-37200 Sewer Sales
$177.32 11/2212002 o US Receipt Serv 6 SEWER 112202ut H 602-37200 Sewer Sales
$17.74 11/22/2002 o US Receipt Sarv Pen 6 SEW 112202ut R 602-37200 Sewer Sales
Act $2,739.92
FUND 60 $2,739.92
$107,888.36
FILTER: (([Period] In(11) and [Act Year] = '2002') and [Tran Nbr] in(10, 13)) and ((((((Not [[ran Oate]=#11/1/2002#)))
ANO ((Not [[ran Oate]=#11/4/2002#))) AND ((Not [[ran Oate]=#11/6/2002#))) ANO ((Not [[ran Oate]=#11/8/2002#)))
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
11/22/02 11 :27 AM
Page 1
*Check Summary Register@
Name
NOVEMBER 2002
Check Date
Check Amt
10100 MAIN STREET BANK
Paid Chi<# 017533 AIR MECHANICAL
Paid Chi<# 017534 ALL SAFE FIRE TEST, INC.
Paid Chk# 017535 BENDER. TERESA
Paid Chi<# 017536 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT
Paid Chi<# 017537 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT
Paid Chk# 017536 CITY OF MINNETRISTA
Paid Chk# 017539 CITY OF ST. PAUL
Paid Chi<# 017540 COMFORT PLUS HEATING & COOLING
Paid Chk# 017541 GOLDENGATE INTERNET SERVICES
Paid Chk# 017542 IRS/MAIN STREET BANK
Paid Chk# 017543 KRIS SWEENEY/PETTY CASH
Paid Chi<# 017544 M-R SIGN COMPANY. INC.
Paid Chi<# 017545 MENARDS - FOREST LAKE
Paid Chk# 017546 MET. COUNCIL ENV. SERVo (SDS)
Paid Chk# 017547 METRO SALES INCORPORATED
Paid Chk# 017548 MiNN. DEPT. OF HEALTH
Paid Chk# 017549 MINNEGASCO'
Paid Chk# 017550 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE
Paid Chk# 017551 MiNNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOC
Paid Chk# 017552 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION
Paid Chk# 017553 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIP. CO.
Paid Chk# 017554 PiERCE & ASSOC.
'aid Chk# 017555 PRESS PUBLICATIONS
aid Chk# 017556 PRESTINE SERVICES
Paid Chk# 017557 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
Paid Chk# 017558 QWEST
Paid Chk# 017559 US BANK'
Paid Chk# 017560 WINNICK SUPPLY
Paid Chk# 017561 XCEL ENERGY
FILTER: None
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
1112712002
1112712002
1112712002
11/2712002
11/2712002
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
11/2712002
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
11/27/2002
Total Checks
$100.50
$158.64
$29.22
$92,968.00
$35,510.56
$20.00
$26.34
$373.00
$60.00
$4,018.91
$47.00
$90.54
$23.81
$11,418.50
$1,235.37
$1,022.00
$835.91
$613.36
$185.00
$1,084.00
$419.12
$1,500.00
$452.81
$380.63
$1,710.08
$60.74
$721.14
$6.15
$415.81
$155,489.14
::;
0. :g,
r- '"
00.
10
'"
o
0\
'" ~ 0 '" 0 N ro '" 0 0 ro ro "
0 ~ '" '" 0 '" '" N 0 '" '" '"
~ 0 .0 <C ,,; oj .0 ..j ,,; ,,; '" '" '"
J: "
UCl '" "- '" "- ~ ~ " '" <; " '"
". " "'- '" &> '" '" ~
~ N ;; N N ;; ;; N ;; ui
&> '" '" '" '" ;:;;
"'- N '" '" " ;,; '" 0 '" '" N '"
0" r- '" "- '" ~ '" ~ '" <'? N
. " N ui N 0 ui <'i <C <'i <i '" ui
J: 0
u E '" '" " '" '" '" '" "- " '"
'" "' '" '" "'. '" o. '" "- ~
~ '" ;; '" "' "' ;;; '" ;;; '" 6
;;;
w '" N '" '" '" '" '" '" N N
" '" '" '" '" 0 '" 0 '" '" 0
...J '" '" '" '" 0 '" 0 0 0 0
o . f::l '" f::l f::l f::l ~ '" '" '" '"
...J .-
J: 0 S i;i i;i ~ ;;:; i;i ~
> '- UC f::l f::l '" S!
<Il ~ ~ ~ .
0:: - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
w .!!!
I- OJ
Z <Il
W 0:: 0"
U .l<: o 0
0 Ulo
U. <Il Ul
0 ~
>- U
I- <(
C3 -'
cr:
w
{fJ z
::; 4 -'
52 z w 0 ~ W
I W >- 0 f-
-; 0 (/) (/)
0 f- vi -' w ..., w w a'
E w -' ::; W ..J -' Z f- '"
0 Z '" '2 '" w cr: w '"
z z <( >- I" I 0 Z f- ,;
0 W 0. Z <f) f- (/) <f) 0
~ '" r:i <( W w '" (/J ci w
ci w w z
0 '" W I '" (/J I '" III
0. 0 N 0. 0 -' W "- w a III
-' III ::> G f- Z
E 0 ~ f- a <( <( () w w $
w (j 0. <f) ::; 0- <f) :> "- {fJ (/)
.. "- " '" '" '" 0
. '" '" '" ;;;
~ " '" '" '" '" GO "- '" '"
'" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
0 0 '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
'" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 0
0. '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
E '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
'" '" 0 0 0 '" '" '" '" 0
III '" 0 0 0 '" '" 0 0 '" 0
'" r- oc '" '" ;::. N '" " '" '"
'" '" '" "- r- "- r- ,... ,...
0 '" '" '" '" '" '" 0 '" '" 0
~ "- "- "- ,... ,... r- r- "- "- "-
J: 0 '" 0 0 '" '" '" '" '" 0
'-''"' 0 '" 0 '" '" 0 '" 0 0 0
"0
,,"0 " " " " " " " " " Ci!;
o .-
0. ~ N '" N '" N N '" '" N
0.
>-" ~
o 0 <; <; <; <; <; <; C; C; C;
0. " '"
G
~ '" '" '" N N '" N N N '"
0 '" '" 0 '" 0 '" '" 0 '" 0
~ 0 0 0 0 '" 0 '" '" '" '"
N N '" '" N '" N '" N N
------ -- --------
.
Centennial Fire District
Check Register
11/19/2002
The disbursements listed below are submitted by the Centennial Fire District for your approval:
DATE
11/19/2002
11/19/2002
11/19/2002
11/19/2002
11/19/2002
11/19/2002
11/19/2002
11/19/2002
11/19/2002
11/19/2002
11/19/2002
11/19/2002
11/19/2002
11/19/2002
11/19/2002
11/19/2002
11/19/2002
11/19/2002
11/19/2002
11/19/2002
CHECK# NAME
13513
13514
13515
13516
13517
13518
13519
13520
13521
13522
13523
13524
13525
13526
13527
13528
13529
13530
13531
13532
Amoco Oil Company
Anoka. Technical College
Capitol City Mutual Aid Association
CenterPoint Energy
Citgo Petroleum Corporation
Connexus Energy
David Bruder
Grainger
Hutchinson Fire Department
Loffler Business Systems
Minnesota Metro Fire Officers Association
Oxygen Service Company, Inc.
Pioneer Products
Postmaster
Qwest
Viking Office Products
Xcel Energy
Zep Manufacturing Company
Rolltex Computers
Randy T. Rolstad
1 of 1
ACCOUNT
42100 - Fuel and Lube
42220 - Travei, Conference, School
42200 - Dues and Memberships
42253 . Station 2 - Gas
42100 . Fuel and Lube
42252 - Station 1 - Electric
42280 - Miscellaneous Expense
42110 - Other Maintenance
42280 - Miscellaneous Expense
42180 - Office Supplies
42200 - Dues and Memberships
42270 - Breathing Air
42130 - Equipment Expense
42180 - Office Supplies
42240 - Telephone
42180 . Office Supplies
42254 - Station 2 - Electric
42230 - Cleaning Supplies Service
42180 - Office Supplies
10105 - Garage Expense
Total
AMOUNT
157.87
435.00
100.00
448.84
245.29
319.94
11.31
99.25
20.00
42.18
100.00
121.14
2,593.84
134.00
203.97
131.97
398.33
489.92
79.88
150.29
$6,283.02
Nov 22 2002 2:05PM
BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK 6516361311
1".2
,
JJ1~ ::100
H AnderIik&
g AstadaIes
Eng;tl\HI'S'N~U
Owner.CI ofC"ntelVillo 1680 inSt. Contervillo MN 503$ Dale: Novemner18,2002
Forl'erlod: 1211312001 to 11/18/2002 Re ue8tNo: 6 AND FINAL
ContlaclO~ NoltlldaleConstruatlon Com nine. 14450 Narttldale Blvd.. R e~ MN 55374
CONTRACTOR'S REQUEST FOR PI\'Y1IIENT
HUNTERS CROSSING
eRA FILE NO. 818-00.114
SUMMARY
1 Origlnel Contract Amount $ 502.n9.55
2 Change Order - Addilian $ 0.00
3 Chenge Order - Deduction $ 0.00
4 Revised Contract Amount $ 502,779.66
5 VoIue Ccmpletod to Delo S 525.49S.84
e Matertal on Hand $ 0.00
7 Amount earned $ 525,493.84
B Less Retalnage 0% $ 0.00
9 Subtotal $ 525,493.84
to La.. Amounl Paid Previously $ 487.641.92
11 LiqultJated damages. $ 0,00
12 AMOUNT DUe THIS ReQUEST FOR FA YMENT NO. B AND FINAL $ 37651.92
RecommeMed for Approval by:
SONESTROO, ROSENE, AHDERUK & ASSOCIATES,INC.
Approved by Contrac;",:
NORTH DALe CONSTRUCTION COMPANY lNe
ApproV9d by OWner.
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Speclliod Contract CompletiOn Oato:
AUQua! 25. 200 1
Oete:
61eOO'14R'EQeFlllal
Nov 22 2002 2,05PN
BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK 6516361311
",.3
,
Conlr.ct Unit Quanllty Amount
No, "om Unit Qu8nHty PrI.. toDat. to Date
Pitt 1 . Sanitary S...,.r . CenteMlla Road
1 Moblllzatton LS 1 13500,00 1 $13,500,00
2 Tra1l'lc conO'Ol LS 1 2912,00 1 52,912,00
3 BholiJd$Iing ag9r09a\e TN 50 24,45 50 51,222.50
4 Clear and grub Tree 2 500,00 2 51,000,00
5 Bitt renoa. "'IIular 1.1" 200 2,00 $0,00
6 Remove and replace 36" CMF LS 1 1500.00 1 $1,500.00
7 Salvage and replace gra..1 drivel\G\l TN 20 11.07 20 $341.40
6 Connect to exisllng manhole EA 1 1500,00 1 $1,500.00
9 12" I've, SDR 35. S'. 10' deep LF 250 26.Oi 250 $7,022.50
10 12"PVC,SDR35,10'-12'deep LF 175 28.09 ITS $4,915,75
11 12" PVC, $OR 35.12'.14' deep I.F 10 28,09 10 $250,90
12 12" PVC. SDR 35, \4'.16' deep I.F 265 28.Oi 255 $1,443,B5
13 12" PVC, SDR 26, IS'. IS' deep LF 5 :;0,54 5 $152,10
14 12" PVC, SDR 26. 18' . 20' deep I.F 15 30.64' 10 $458,10
15 4' dla. sanllflry manMle EA 1 1394.73 1 $1,394.73
15 Manhole ovel'depth LF 3 99,91 3 $299.91
17 AditJot manhole and casting SA 1 150.00 1 5150.00
18 Remove bituminous sfreet 8Y 330 2.00 250 $6<)0,00
19 Ptltch bituminous Slroe! BY 330 15.92 31~ $5,030.12
20 Salvage and reino\ell 12" CMp ""'vert L1' 40 16.67 40 S6M,80
21 Improved pipe foundation 1.1' 120 0.01 $0.00
22 Fiber bI<lnlc$t on steep ..opel Sy 600 2.06 $0.00
23 Seeding with 1000soil and mulch AC 0.75 998.40 0.31 5309.50
Total Part 1 . Sanitary Sewer. CenleNllie Road $50,501.36
PIIrt 2 . Watar Main. COlllOrV"'" Road
24 Connect to exloting 12" ....Ie. main EA j 750.00 1 $750.00
25 12" PVC. C900 LF 1062 23.66 1062 $25,339.32
26 an PVC. CellO 1.1' 35 15,71 85 $584.85
27 ~" PVC, COOO 1.1' 80 14,24 sa $112.00
2!l 8" gale vai\le and box EA 1 652.74 1 $652.14
:<\l 12" butter1ly I/lIive and bax EA 3 851.33 3 $2,553.99
30 Hy<lrant with gste valve end box SA 3 1699,17 3 $6.697.51
31 Valve roQ ax:tansion EA 7 143,49 7 $1,004.43
32 Fillings 1.6 3000 1,15 3000 $3,450.00
33 Improved plpa foundst!on LF 1100 0,01 $0.00
34 S<>dd\'\g SY 700 2.55 700 $1.765,00
35 12" pipe ,_.Inl fA 20 69,64 20 $1,392.80
35 e" pipe ....tra"'t EA 4 3l1,e5 4 $159.40
37 S.edlng wi1I1lopscil end muich AC 0.25 1018.84 1 $1.016.64
Total Part 2 . Waler Main. CenteNllie Road $45,100.68
Pert 3 - lkrvlo.. - Contorvlll. Road
3B 12" x 6" PVC wye EA 2 236.27 2 $412,54
3ll 12"X4"PVC-..ye EA Z 229.8Il 2 $459.76
40 4" PVC, Sohadule 40 oel'lli"" pi"" LF 40 1'.22 35 $392.10
41 5" HDPE sewer saNies d~ectlonal drill 1.1' 156 42.02 150 56.=,00
42 4" PVC, SCI'IedU/e 40 rlsar pipe LF 10 \7.47 10 $114.10
43 110 copper water "Nice LF 90 8.SS 80 $587.20
44 ill copper servIce directional drill LF 400 g.311 418 $3,92M2
4~ Reoonl18ct: water .servics EA 1 118.76 1 $178.16
46 Cormacl to existing sewer service eA 1 178.76 1 $118.76
41 1" ClJrb stop end box EA 6 132.51 6 $~.oe
48 1" corporellan stoP eA 1 143.18 7 $1 ,002.12
TotaJ Pert 3 . SQrvlces.. CentervUle Road $14.569.62
Part 4..Sanl1ary Sewer.. HumersCrQulng
49 8" PVC, SOR 35,18'. 20'deep -laCked LF eo 248.99 60 $14.619.40
60 S" PVC, SDR 35,8'- 10' deep LF 36<) 15,25 360 $<i.S67,5O
51 8" PVC. SOR 35.10'-12' deep LF 900 13.37 900 616,533,00
52 B" PVC, SOR 35,12'.14' deep LF 3DO 18.37 300 $6,611,DO
53 8" PVC, SDR35, 14'. 16' deep LF aDO 20.14 493 $9,629,02
64 4' di9meter san itary mannole SA 9 1362.87 10 $13.628.70
56 Manhole overdepth LF 56 99.87 63 $6,298.41
56 Improved pipe founcalion LF 20DO 0.01 $0,00
Total Part 4 - Sanitary SQwar ~ Hunters Crossing $71.407,03
61300; ",4Rl!OeF'rnal
Nov 22 2002 2:08PN
BONESTROO ROSENE RNDERLIK 6516361311
",.6
.
PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS
OWNER CITY OF' CENTERVILLE
BRA FILE NO. 616-00-114-
CONTRACTOR NORTHOALE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INe
CHANGE ORDERS
No. Dale
Description
Amount
T otllt Change Ord....
PAYMENT SUMMARY
No. From To Pavmenl Retal nag.. ComoletBd
1 07/27/2000 09105/00 164,945.15 9.733.96 194.679.11
:< 09/0612000 10/02/00 199 943.79 20 2~7.31 405.146.25
.3 1010312000 10125/00 52 122.65 24.531.36 461 642.95
4 10126/2000 03/26101 29,084,18 24531.35 490,621.13
5 0312712001 12/12/01 21 746.15 4927.70 492 769.62
6AND FINAL 1211312001 11/18102 37,651.112 525,493.84
Malerlal on Hand
Total Pa~ment to Da1e $525 493.64 Ori~lnal Contract $502.n9.56
,'letalnaoe Pa~ No. 6 AND FINAL Chanoe Orders
Total Amount Eamed $525493.84 Re~i.ed Contract $502 ne.56
(11600' 14R..EQ6Flnal
<r
Nov 22 2002 2:07PM
BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK 6516361311
No.
Item
Total Part 1 - Sanitary s"""r - Cent.".I" Road
Total Part 2 - Water Main - Centorvill& Road
Total Part 3 - Services - c"nterville Road
Total Part 4 - Sanitary Sewer - Hunter. Crossing
Total Pari ~ - Water Main - Hunters CrOSSing
Tolol Part 6 - Services - Hunte,. Crossing
Total Part 7- Storm S-r . Hunters Cro.slng
Total f'Qrt 6 - Street - Hunt81'S Crossing
Total Work Completed To D.is
IHtlOO'lo1lR~QllFil'1lll
Untt
Contract
Qu.ntlty
Untt
I'rlce
Quantity
10 Dat.
Amount
to DattJ
$50,601.36
$45.100.1lll
$14,569.62
871,407.00
855,960.32
$34,587.12
837,766.44
8215.601.26
$526,493.ll4
",.5
Nov 22 2002 2:08PM SOHESTROO ROSENE ANDERLlK 8518381311 ",.4
,
Conlract Unit Quantity Aml)Unt
No. Rem Unit Quenl~y Pri<:8 Ie 0811> IoDate
Part !i .. Water Main.. Hl.lnt.r:c Crossing
57 8" PVC. ~OO - Jacked LF 45 143.24 45 86,445.80
58 8" PVC. C9DO LF 1330 14.05 1310 518,405.50
60 6' PIIC. CODO LF 810 11,58 814 $9.426.12
60 6' gate valve and box EA 2 490.86 2 $981.72
51 5" gate valve aM box EA 4 1l52.74 4 $2.610.96
62 Hydrant with gale valve .nd box EA 6 1699.17 6 511.396.02
66 Valve rod oxten,jon EA 12 05.49 12 51.181.88
64 Gate valve wrenCh. B' 10000g EA 1 M.08 1 539.08
65 Gati valve INranc", 3' long EA 2 23.11 2 $46.22
66 Hydrant wren"" EA 3 20.50 3 $88.50
67 Flttlngs LB 3000 1.30 3000 $3,900.00
68 Improved pipe foundation LF 1000 0.Q1 50.00
69 8" plpo rSI!train1 EA 24 39.82 24 5955.68
70 6" pipe re.\raint EA 16 30.24 18 $483.84
7L insulation, 2" !nIck $V 20 17A~ SO.OO
Total Part 5 - Water Main - Hunlenl C"",.lng 555.9S0.32
Pan 8 - SeNICllS . Hunte", Cro..lng
72 a")(4~!=lVCwye EA 37 76.83 37 $2.536.31
73 4' I'Ve ..._ ..",Ico LF 17~a 6.64 1829 $12.14-4.56
74 4' PVC riser pipe LF 90 fTA7 109 $1.904.23
76 1" copper 'NStar service LF 1730 6.76 '934 $11.139.64
76 I' wrb .top ond box EA 37 107.61 37 53.977.67
17 l' corporatIon stop EA 37 67.05 37 52.480.65
78 Curb box _nch EA 3 34.82 3 $104.48
To/al P!!tri 6. 6arvlca. - Hunler. Cros.lng $34.58712
Part 7 - 5larm Sewer" Hunte", Crossing
79 12' HOPE LF" 330 17.51 330 $5.178.30
80 12" FlCF. Cia.. 5 LF 120 20.77 120 $2.492,40
81 15" RCP. Cla.s 5 LF 8Q 22.14 60 $1.771.20
82 18" HOPE LF" 215 22.91 215 $4.926.65
5S 15" RCF. CI... 5 LF" 210 24-.16 238 55.750.08
64 lmproved pipe foundation LF 600 O.Ql $Q.oo
66 Catch ba.ln EA 4 942.19 4 53.766.76
66 Catch basin manholet EA 4 1.71.39 4 $5.485.56
87 Pond outlet structure EA 1 1698.07 1 $1.890.07
88 12" RCP apronwllrash guard EA 1 534-52 1 5534.52
89 12" HDPE apron wltruh guard EA 1 264.43 1 5254.43
90 18" FlCF .proo wllr.sh guart! EA 1 649.81 1 5649.61
91 18' HDPE .pron w/trash guard EA 2 SQM3 2 5613.26
92 Rock. rlprep, Class 3 CY 25 55.0Q 40 $2.600.00
9S SodditIQ SY 500 2.55 4aS $1.244.40
Total Part 7 . Storm S~e:r ~ Hunters Cro$S\I1Q 537.766.44
Part 8 " strut - Hunte", Croeelng
94 Mill bltumlnolJ8 Sb'lp LF 100 3.12 150 5468.00
95 Subgracle preparation RO eTA 24 126.QQ 24 $3.QOO.OQ
96 Granular borrow leV) cy 5000 9.71 6535 564,716.85
97 Aggregate base. Cia.. 5 - .tree'" TN 3300 9.30 3450 $32,065.00
98 Aggregate base, CI... 5 - ,-aU TN 700 9.82 994 $9,T81.06
99 Typo 316 bilumlnous baoe course TN 700 27.61 522.26 $22,620.92
100 Typo 416 ,ilumlnous wear course - .treets TN 700 29.64 a70.3 $26.795.69
10, Type 41 A bltumlnou. .....r - tra II TN 165 86.46 263 510.869.84
102 Bituminous maler"'l for ",ok coal GAL 400 1.30 500 $650.00
103 Surmountable concrete c~b and gutter LF 4400 6.55 4333 $<8,857.75
10' Barrtcade EA 2 234.00 2 $466.00
106 4 ~ draintile LF 4260 3.42 4105 $14,039.10
106 Geotexlll" fabric Sy 9000 1.35 0000 512,160.QO
107 Seeding with Iopsoi and mulch AC 1.5 996.40 $0.00
rotal Part S . Strset. HuntErs Ctossin9 5215.501.26
.
ajtOO114~EaeJ:i,*
.
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY CANVASSING BOARD MEETING
NOVEMBER 5, 2002
9:30 P.M.
I.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Swedberg called the Canvassing Board Meeting to order at 9:36 p.m.
Present at the meeting were Councilmembers Broussard Vickers, Capra,
Nelson, Travis; Mayor Swedberg and City Administrator Kim Moore-Sykes.
The City Administrator ~eported that because of the hand counting of the U.S.
Senate supplemental ballots, the election results were not tabulated. She
indicated that because of the required hand counting, the results would not be
available until early Wednesday morning. She recommended that the
Canvassing Board continue this evening's meeting to another date.
Moved bv Councilmember Nelson seconded bv Councilmember
Broussard to continue tbe Canvassing Board meetinl! to Saturday.
November 9. 2002 at 9:00 a.m. All in favor. Motion nassed unanimouslv.
Respectfully submitted by:
~~) t~'
. ..;::;.,. /'. .' . ./ /
~ ;;~ : / ){{J-tlt: -5<-(/.... ;'L;i---
('~~oore-SYkes, / j'
City Administrator /
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY CANVASSING BOARD MEETING
NOVEMBER 9, 2002
9:00 A.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Swedberg called the Canvassing Board Meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
Present at the meeting were Council members Broussard Vickers, Capra,
Mayor Swedberg and City Administrator Kim Moore-Sykes. Absent were
Councilmembers Nelson and Travis.
The City Clerk gave a report on the Election Day activities. She reported that
316 new voters were registered; that there was 79% turn out at the polls in
Centerville; and that 1,607 ballots were counted.
The City Clerk read the results of the municipal elections, declaring Terry
Sweeney winner for the mayoral seat; Tom Lee and JeffPaar winners for the
Council seats.
The Clerk then asked the Mayor and Council to recognize election judges and
staff that assisted with the elections.
Moved bv Councilmember Broussard Vickers seconded bv Mavor
Swedbel1! to certify the municipal elections results. All in favor. Motion
passed unanimouslv.
Council and Staff discussed the need for purchasing additional ballot boxes.
They also discussed the idea of creating two precincts because so many
residents traditionally vote at elections.
Moved bv Conncilmember Broussard Vickers seconded bv
Councilmember Capra to adiourn the Canvassine: Board at 9:20 a.m. All
in favor. Motion passed unanimouslv.
Respe~UY SUbmitterYtJ
~'>}~;/I{t~(li' -)0;1'./; t~d-
Kim Moore-Sykes,! ,I
City Administratot :
.
.
. .
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOVEMBER 13, 2002
6:30 p.m.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled
meeting on November 13, 2002, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street.
PRESENT:
Mayor Tim Swedberg
Council Member Dick Travis
Council Member Mari Nelson
Council Member Broussard ViC~........ r... i f!0.,.. < (1......
Council Member capraiJ/ & 16
None.
;: .0 \f(t~
~[?)WU@
ABSENT:
STAFF:
City Administrator, Ms. Moore-Sykes
City Engineer, Mr. Tom Peterson
City Attorney, Mr. Jim Hoeft
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Swedberg called the November 13, 2002, City Council meeting to order at 6:30
p.m.
II. SET AGENDA
Council Member Capra asked ifMr. LeBlanc desired to be added under appearances.
Motion bv Council Member Nelson seconded bv Council Member Capra to approve
the al!enda as amended. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
III. A W ARDS/PRESENTATIONS/APPEARANCES
1. Mr. Wayne LeBlanc
Mr. Wayne Leblanc, 1677 Peltier Lake Drive, addressed Council and indicated he is on
the Parks and Recreation Committee and the Committee has been trying to add trails to
the Comprehensive Plan for several years and it has not yet been done. He then
requested that Council makes adding trails to the Comprehensive Plan a priority when the
Plan is updated.
1_
.
.
. ,
City of Cemerville
November 13, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
2. Mr. Tom Lee (Parks and Recreation Committee) - Acorn CreekJWoods of
Clearwater Creek Development Trail
Mayor Swedberg congratulated Mr. Lee on his election to Council.
Mr. Lee indicated there have been no further erosion problems and no evidence of any
erosion so he feels the trail is repaired but will be curious to see what will happen when
the water gets high.
IV. PUBLIC HEARING(S)
1. Proposed Ordinance 70 and 71
Mayor Swedberg opened the public hearing at 6:39 p.m. for Ordinance 70 and 71.
Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated the City had received comments from Mr. Silverman, the
attorney for Hair Update.
2. Mr. and Mrs. John Buckbee III - Rezone/Preliminarv Plat Approval
Mayor Swedberg opened the public hearing at 6:40 p.m.
Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated the Planning and Zoning Commission heard the rezoning
request as well as the preliminary plat approval at its meeting on November 12, 2002.
She then indicated that the minutes were not yet available but she had provided
information to Council with a Staff report and noted that the Planning Commission
recommended approval of both the rezone and the preliminary plat with the conditions
listed in the Staff report.
Council Member Capra indicated she had watched the hearing on television and had
taken notes about the concerns of residents. She then indicated she had done some
research to attempt to provide answers to some of the concerns.
Council Member Capra indicated she had contacted Rice Creek Watershed and found that
the information was recently received by them and the matter will be on the November
27, 2002 agenda. She then indicated that an environmental assessment worksheet would
be completed and that would determine whether an archaeological dig would be required.
Council Member Capra asked if there had been digging at the property for archaeological
findings. Mr. John Buckbee indicated he knew of no investigation but said there was
some remedial work done to the end of the creek that involved some digging.
Council Member Capra indicated she had not been able to answer any of the traffic
questions or concerns.
Page 2 of29
City of CenterviUe
November 13, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Mayor Swedberg explained that the City's Comprehensive Plan is a guide for the
development of the City. He then explained that the Buckbee property is an R-1 property
which is a rural large piece of property with one house and farm or rural character. He
further explained that the request for R-2 is proper in that the City's Comprehensive Plan
calls for this piece of property to go into MUSA for 2001 to 2005.
Ms. Mary Moran, 1743 Peltier Lake Drive, restated her comments from the Planning and
Zoning Commission meeting. She then said that she is concerned that the road would
dam up the water into her backyard because right now the water flows through her
backyard. She also said she is concerned that all the trees would be removed for the
development and said she would like as many trees to be left as possible.
Ms. Moran indicated she was also concerned that the twin homes are too large and do not
fit with the rest of the homes in the neighborhood. She further commented that she is
concerned about what types of chemicals would be used on the lawns of the townhomes
because the runoff flows into the creek and then the lake.
Ms. Suzanne Seeley, 1784 Peltier Lake Drive, said she agreed with the previous
comments but said her major concern is that 2/3 of the property is bordered by two
natural resources, the creek and the lake. She then said that she can see a tremendous
difference in algae buildup from three years ago to present and she is concerned that
adding more people to that area will further exacerbate the problem. She further
commented that she had heard that commercial companies do not have to adhere to the
phosphate free fertilizer laws as a regular homeowner does.
Ms. Seeley commented that 27 homes would double the density in the area and she would
like to see the impact lessened by lowering that number.
Mr. Terry Blken, 1701 Peltier Lake Drive, asked why the water had to come down
Centerville Road when there is already a hydrant on Peltier Lake Drive and Mill Road.
He also said that he has already paid for the road twice and does not want to pay a third
time. He further commented that he was concerned with the little section of land at the
end of the channel that is not buildable and asked what was planned for it because it is in
his backyard.
Council Member Capra commented that the plan has not gone before the Parks and
Recreation Commission for their consideration and said that would be completed at their
meeting in December.
Mr. Bill Helin, 1732 Peltier Lake Drive, indicated he was concerned about the water table
there and for the outlot by the creek or channel. He then said that he feels it is only
asking for trouble and flooded homes to build there.
Mr. Roger Shimon, 1751 Peltier Lake Drive, commented that he does not feel that double
homes are appropriate and would prefer single-family homes. He then asked what is
Page 3 of29
L __
City ofCenterville
November 13,2002
Council Meeting Minutes
really going to happen with the development, will there be street lights, water, a sidewalk,
etc.
Mr. Shimon asked why it took so long to get the information to Rice Creek Watershed
when this has been dragging on for a couple of months. He then said the holding pond is
proposed to be located adjacent to the rear of his home and he is concerned with the
children in the area and asked if the pond area would be fenced. He further commented
that he is concerned that runoff would contaminate the wells in the area.
Mr. Shimon indicated that he would like Council to hold off on approval of the
preliminary plat and obtain further information.
Council Member Capra apologized to the residents who attended the meeting last night
and this meeting because the City does not have all the information and cannot answer all
of the questions. She then said she feels there is enough information to approve the
rezone but commented that the requirement to go 100 feet off the property line with
levels to compare was not done as well as several other items and she would like to wait
on approval until more of the pending items have been completed.
Mr. Don Simonson, 7263 Centerville Road, commented that he did not feel it was
necessary to tear up a perfectly good road to run water when the City had the opportunity
to do it with the Lakeland Hills development and did not.
Council Member Capra indicated the water could be added through direct drilling rather
than tearing up the road. Mr. Peterson commented that it may be necessary to run
services with an open cut.
Mr. Bill Svetin, 1687 Peltier Lake Drive, indicated he would not be able to make a
decision at this time because there was not enough information submitted on the plat. He
then said he would like Rice Creek Watershed's opinion and the environmental
assessment worksheet for further information on the potential environmental impact of
the proposed development.
Mr. Svetin said he agrees that the property owner should have the right to rezone and
develop the property but the City needs to carefully look at what is proposed to go on that
property to make sure that it enhances the neighboring property values.
Mr. Svetin indicated that residents have been fighting the addition of water for a long
time and the last time was when LakeJand Hills went in. He then said that he feels he has
paid to build the street enough and does not want to do it again.
Council Member Nelson clarified that the residents were assessed and paid the first time
and the second time they were assessed and did not pay the City paid.
Mr. Svetin indicated that residents took the City to court and the City ended up paying for
the road. He then said he feels the road should be the responsibility of the developer
Page 4 of29
Clty of Centerville
November 13, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
including the street north through the development because he does not feel residents on
that street will benefit and, so, should not have to pay an assessment. He also indicated
that he does not think that twin homes would be appropriate between single-family
homes.
Mr. Svetin indicated he is concerned with the drainage and whether the holding pond can
handle it all because right now the storm sewers cannot handle it.
Mr. Svetin indicated residents have fought for the lake for many years and he is very
concerned with drainage but approves of the rezoning.
Mr. Ted Erkenbrack, 7377 Peltier Circle, indicated that some residents, including him,
had to pay a second time for the road. He then said that the hydrant is close to Peltier
Lake on Mill Road but it would require a culvert under the creek and, even though it is
the shortest route, it would be more expensive.
Council Member Travis asked the engineer ifhe had a preliminary layout for water. Mr.
Peterson indicated the plan was to loop the water.
Mr. Erkenbrack asked if residents would have to pay for 350 feet of frontage. He then
said he is concerned with the density and would like to see single-family homes. He
further indicated that he does not have an issue with the rezoning.
Council Member Nelson asked residents to make comments at this meeting even if those
comments were made at the Planning and Zoning meeting.
A resident in the audience asked why the water needed to be looped. Mr. Peterson
explained that looping water benefits all residents because it provides better water
pressure as well as an alternate source of water should one of the lines fail.
Council Member Capra indicated that Centerville Elementary could benefit greatly from
looping the system because there is a concern that the school may run out of pressure if
the sprinkler system is used. She then commented that there was some money set aside
when Lakclal1d Circle was done to offset the cost of looping.
Mr. Shimon indicated he is concerned with the traffic generated by this development as
there is already an issue getting out of the area in the morning.
Council Member Nelson asked if the water could be run through a culvert or if the road
would have to be tom up. Mr. Peterson indicated he did not know for certain but said it
is possible to directional drill into the boulevard areas and drill under the street as was
done along County Road 14 (Main Street). He then commented that, even though the
street was redone twice in 20 years, it is not in very good shape and could use some
reconstruction.
Page 5 of29
City of CentervilIe
November 13, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Mr. Leon Moran, 1743 Peltier Lake Drive, indicated he is concerned with traffic from the
additional homes as well as the big construction trucks carrying heavy loads beating up
the roads. Mr. Peterson indicated that there would be road restrictions in effect during
the spring and indicated that constmction would begin in the summer.
Mr. Moran asked if anybody had an estimate of what the assessments might be. Mayor
Swedberg explained that the assessment information would not be available until further
along in tbe process. He then gave a base figure of $4,300 as an estimate.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the assessment is completely
dependent upon the overall costs of the project. She then commented that residents have
paid 50% of the costs not including the new development costs but noted that residents
would also be required to pay to get the line to their home as well as a hook up fee of
$1,500 when the well fails and the water is connected.
Council Member Broussard Vickers further commented that the base dollar amount of the
assessment is completely dependent on the cost of the project and could be higher or
lower than the $4,300 estimated.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked for clarification on what type of rezoning was
requested and noted that PUD was different with different requirements than the rezone
to R-2. Ms. Moore-Sykes clarified that the applicant has applied for a PUD and that will
be heard in December.
Mr. Gonyea indicated they had gotten on the calendar for a PUD in case that is needed to
comply with the setbacks in the ordinance.
Mayor Swedberg asked for clarification of the PUD. City Attorney Hoeft explained that
a PUD overlay on the ordinance means that the requirements of R-2 zoning could be
restructured to allow for different setbacks without requiring a variance.
Council Member Broussard Vickers commented that PUD was supposed to be used 011
unique properties to accommodate specific, unique situations. She then indicated Eagle
Pass was a PUD and was designed to go around creeks and wetlands and said that by its
nature, a PUD is supposed to be able to help to preserve unique characteristics of the
property.
Mr. Gonyea indicated his intent would be to plat the property as three (3) single-family
lots with 97 foot building pads as well as the townhomes. He then indicated that Rice
Creek Watershed has had the information but the delineation was recently approved and
the information given to the consulting engineers for consideration at the November 27,
2002 meeting. He also commented that the piece of land proposed as a park at the end of
the road was a suggestion by the Buckbees, but if it does not work for the neighbors he is
not committed to doing it.
Page 6 of29
City of Centerville
November 13,2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Mr. Gonyea indicated that his development would be required to capture runoff whereas
it is currently running directly into the creek and lake.
Mr. Gonyea explained that his townhomes would be slab on grade and geared toward
seniors. He then said that the blended density of the parcel would be two (2) units per
acre. He further commented that traffic study counts indicate that a single family home
generates 9.5 to 10.5 trips per household, condos drop to 5.5 trips per day and senior
housing drops to 2.2 to 3.4 trips per day.
Mr. Gonyea commented that the density of the project is reduced by gearing it toward
seniors as seniors make fewer trips per day.
Mr. Gonyea commented that he would bear the brunt of bringing the water main in but
the City would like to loop the system and assess residents for the benefit. He then said
that there is already a sleeve under the creek so the road would not have to be torn up.
Council Member Travis indicated that residents had expressed concern about existing
drainage. Mr. Gonyea indicated that Rice Creek Watershed would control all drainage
issues and he would have to comply with any requirements to capture runoff and provide
ponding.
Council Member Travis indicated residents were concerned that trees would be removed.
Mr. Gonyea indicated that the grading on all the single-family lots would be custom
graded for the driveway and house to avoid any unnecessary tree removal.
Council Member Travis indicated that the developer could not legally push water onto
someone else's property. He then asked Mr. Peterson if he had reviewed the existing
drainage. Mr. Peterson indicated he had not yet reviewed the drainage in the area.
Council Member Capra commented that the developer is required to go out 100 feet from
the property line. Mr. Peterson referred to the information provided and indicated that
tb:ey are out two feet. Mr. Gonyea indicated that he would be required to provide a catch
basin or the water would flow up onto the street. Mr. Peterson indicated Ulat a culvert
could be added to allow for drainage.
Council Member Travis asked what the home values of the development would be. Mr.
Gonyea indicated that the townhome units would range in price from $250,000 to
$300,000 and the single-family homes would start at $400,000.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the City would not be taking possession of
the outlots and asked whether there would be a homeowners association.
Council Member Nelson indicated she would be okay with the rezoning but is not
prepared to vote on the preliminary plat as she feels more information as to the potential
environmental impact is needed.
Page 70f29
City of Centerville
November 13,2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Council Member Capra indicated she would go ahead with the rezoning but would like to
continue the preliminary plat to the first meeting in December.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked when the clock started on the preliminary plat.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the clock started last Friday.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the rezone fits the Comprehensive Plan.
She then said that there is a lot to iron out on the preliminary plat but she believes it is
important to loop the water main as that has been a goal as long as she has been around
and it is important to the safety of citizens and the safety of the school. She further said
she hopes for the shortest distance and for the cheapest amount for residents but the City
has always taken advantage of whenever a developer needs sewer and water and makes
them pick up as much of the cost as possible.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the Jaw states that the City cannot assess
more than the value that residents get from the improvement and each unit owner has a
right to challenge an assessment so the City needs to make an effort to make sure that it is
within that amount so the City does not end up in court. She then said that this is the
third development where sewer and water have been run past existing homes and the City
is getting better at it each time.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that she felt the rezone should be approved
but Council does not have to decide on the POO at this time.
Mayor Swedberg said he looked at the Comprehensive Plan closely and looked at the
surface water drainage questions addressed and the controlling people that deal with
floods are the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the Federal Emergency
Management Agency. He then said the original flood plain designation was extensive
and would have covered most of the existing City but was revised in 1997 to a smaller
area. He further commented that a significant portion of this property is in the 100- year
flood plain and he is concerned with putting houses on a floodplain.
Mayor Swedberg indicated he did not have a concern with R-2 zoning but he is not in
favor of the areas that are designated as P-l and C-l. He then said that a definition of C-
1 could be addressed because the map by its existence is a definition.
Mayor Swedberg indicated he needed to know the elevation at the comer where
Centerville Road meets Peltier Lake Drive to determine whether it is higher than the land
to be developed. He then commented that this is the delta of a creek so it fans out and
adds more sediment and the elevation today may not be the elevation in 25 years, so he is
concerned with that. He further commented he does not mind homes going in there but
he does not want them where they would be flooded.
Mayor Swedberg indicated he was not prepared to vote on the rezoning and would like to
continue the matter until he has further information from a hydrologist to assure that
Page 8 of 29
City of Centerville
November 13,2002
Council Meeting Minutes
when homes are put there they will not be in water or one foot away from water shortly
thereafter,
Mayor Swedberg indicated there are good reasons to loop the water but he thinks the
developer should pay for the entire thing,
Motion bv Mavor Swedbere:. seconded bv Council Member Nelson to continue the
rezone and preliminary plat to the next Council Meetine: for further information
and discussion.
Mr. John Buckbee, 7381 Peltier Circle, indicated that the assessments have no bearing on
the rezoning, He then said that they applied back in September and there was a series of
delays and the information in front of Council has been with Council for some time. He
further commented that he is concerned with putting this off because it is already past the
60 days and the City added another 60 days.
My. Buckbee explained that the P-l property was purchased from the St Paul Water
Utility and is no longer public property and, as a matter of housekeeping, should be
rezoned, He then explained that City Attorney Hoeft had given an opinion that C-I is not
a legal zoning and was put in 'at one time as a vision for trails. He further commented
that he is asking that the property be rezoned to R-2 and noted that, at one time, it was all
zoned R-l other than the land purchased from the St Paul Water Utility,
Council Member Nelson indicated she did not understand where C-l and P-l were on the
map.
Mayor Swedberg explained where it as and said it delineates flood plain and said that
whether or not it exists in Ordinance #4 does not make it illegal and those things are
correctable, He then said as far as he is concerned, it makes a definition of category C-l
as flood plain and that is for places where you do not want to have anyone build on.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that flood plain is not a zoning so
Ordinance #4 would not address it
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated there was flood plain in the middle of the
City with residential zoning,
My. Gonyea indicated that Rice Creek does have a setback of 100 feet and a setback of75
feet for grading so there would be no grading within the setbacks from the channel. He
also indicated that the P-l area would likely fall under a drainage and utility easement,
Council Member Nelson indicated she felt that Rice Creek Watershed would take care of
this issue,
VOTE: Aves -l(Swedbere:). Navs - 4. Motion failed.
Page 9 of 29
City of Centerville
November 13, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Motion by Council Member Capra, seconded by Council Member Broussard
Vickers to approve the rezone from R-l, P-l, and C-l to R-2 as requested. Ayes - 4,
Nays -l(Swedberl!). Motion carried.
Motion by Council Member Capra, seconded by Council Member Nelson to
continue the public hearinl! on the preliminary plat to December 9, 2002.
Council Member Travis indicated that the concerns of the Mayor regarding elevations
and designations is not the job of the City it is the job of the City's consultants and
engineers and people who know about these issues. He then said the only issue that he
has is he does not agree with continuing the preliminary plat because he thinks that the
only issue that he sees that is not resolved is the twin homes versus the single homes.
Council Member Nelson said she could go either way but she also does not agree with
twinhomes so she would vote to continue to December 9,2002.
Council Member Capra said she thinks the City needs more information from Rice Creek
Watershed and the City's Engineer before making any further decisions.
Mayor Swedberg indicated his comments were more appropriate for this phase of the
matter. He then said that the City has had developers who have worked with the City to
mitigate the concerns of neighbors where there were twinhomes and single family homes.
He further indicated he is not sure that mixed style housing is appropriate in this area.
Mayor Swedberg asked Mr. Peterson to come to the meeting prepared to say how deep
into the ground the road would need to go and whether the utilities can go in without
heaving as well as the elevation of the corner of Peltier Lake Drive and CenterviIle Road.
VOTE: Ayes - 4, Nays -l(Trayis). Motion carried.
Mr. Gonyea asked the City to provide a list of concerns so he could address them prior to
the meeting on December 9, 2002. Mayor Swedberg indicated that Mr. Gonyea should
obtain a copy of the minutes to obtain the list of concerns.
Council recessed at 8:15 p.m.
Council reconvened at 8:21 p.m.
3. KCR. Inc. - Mr. Richard S. Carlson Lot Split
Mr. Wilharber, 6849--Centerville Road, addressed Council and indicated his family farm "~
was originally part of the Leon Nettles farm 104 years ago. He then explained that it
started out as 84.5 acres but they lost 40 acres to the open park preserve of Anoka County
and that left 44.4 acres of which the family recently sold 43.4 to Mr. Richard S. Carlson
for development.
Page 10 of29
City of Centerville
November 13, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Mr. Wilharber explained that he and Mr. Carlson had worked out a deal to sell back to
him a section that is 208.7 feet by 100 feet for his garden, raspberries and apple trees and
that is the lot split. The second part of the request is to add the 208.7 by 100 foot parcel
to his existing property making the existing property 308.7 by 217 feet.
Mayor Swedberg asked whether the big bam was on his property. Mr. Wilharber
explained that the piece of ground between his place and the farm was to put in
strawberries and raspberries and the building was to facilitate that but the family decided
to sell the farm when his mother passed away.
Mayor Swedberg indicated that the lot split and combining of properties would give him
his portion of the property and the remaining portion of the family farm has been sold to
Mr. Carlson.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated he had no issues with the request.
Council Member Capra indicated she was concerned with the request because the lot split
for Mr. Carlson requires a minimum of 1 0 acres.
Mr. Wilharber explained he was asking for an R-2 zoning designation.
Council Member Capra indicated she did not understand how it could be done with the
R-l designation. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated it would be dependent on
the next motion passing.
Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council Member
Travis to approve the lot split for KCR Investments subiect to approval of a
rezonin2 request bv Mr. Wilharber.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the motion would be appropriate as it would be
conditioned on the rezoning.
Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated the rezoning was a housekeeping issue to make the property
conforming.
Council Member Capra indicated there is no grandfather clause in the Ordinance. City
Attorney Hoeft indicated the grandfathering is done by operation oflaw and is not needed
in the ordinance.
VOTE: Aves - 4, Nays -l(Capra). Motion carried.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council Member
Travis to approve the lot combination rezonin2 request of Mr. Wilharber. Ayes - 4,
Nays -l(Capra). Motion carried.
Page 11 of29
L__ __
City of Centerville
November 13, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Mr. Wilharber thanked Council for its consideration and commented that while he was
sitting on Council the City went through 12 developments. He then wished them good
luck.
Motion bv Council Member Nelson, seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to close the public heariue: on Ordinauce #70 and #71. All in favor. Motion
carried unanimouslv.
Mayor Swedberg closed the public hearing at 8:33 p.m.
4. Mr. Tom Wilharber Lot Combination/Rezone
Handled as part ofthe previous agenda item.
5. CSAH 14 Special Assessments and Resolution #02-056
Mayor Swedberg opened the public hearing at 8:33 p.m.
Mr. Peterson reviewed the assessments for the project indicating that the City's portion
for oversizing is $41,760 making the total assessable costs $155,859. He then said that
the developer would pay 50% of that and what is left is divided by ] 8 units, 10 residential
units and 8 DaFoe units for $4,330 per unit.
Mr. Peterson indicated he had received an objection from Mr. Rehbein today as the total
assessment to the Shores of $77,923 divided by his 10 lots works out to $7,792 and that
does not compare to the $4,330 for the other lots.
Council Member Broussard Vickers commented that if Mr. Rehbein continues to object
the assessment the City would defend the position in Court and does not have to justify
the costs now.
Council Member Capra commented that when this development was discussed previously
she thought Council felt that the gain to Waterworks and to the Shores was equal.
Mr. Frank Zimny, 7252 LaValle Drive, commented that the original bid amount was
around $159,000. He then asked how the costs had risen to $197,000. Mr. Peterson
indicated that 20% was added for engineering and inspection, staking, and soil testing.
Mr. Peterson further explained that there were change orders totaling approximately
$6,000, engineering reports and plans of approximately $19,000, staking inspection
construction engineering of $9,000, soil borings of $4,000, -and assessment..-Toll
preparation of $1,000.
Mr. Zimny asked if the City has accepted the project. Mr. Peterson indicated the City is
still holding some money on the contract to make sure the sod grows next year. Mr.
Zimny commented he has been in contact with the City inspector concerning restoration
work.
Page 12 of29
City of CenterviJIe
November [3,2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Mr. Zimny indicated that the City's proposed portion was $53,460 and he is curious how
that amount was lowered to $41,760. Mr. Peterson explained that the first amount was an
estimate and the actual amount was based on the difference between the 10 inch and 6
inch pipe being used. The price per foot was only $11.00 versus the estimated $15.00.
Mr. Zimny asked if the City picks up part of the indirect costs. Mr. Peterson indicated
the City picks up its portion of the indirect costs.
Mr. Zimny indicated the flat rate that was discussed was relative to 7281, the two unit
area and the discussion ranged from $25,000 to $34,000. He also indicated that there
were 8 units attributed to the 7265 Main Street address versus the 6 now being used. Mr.
Peterson explained that he had rechecked the lot sizes and determined that there would
only be about 6 units possible.
Mr. Bart Rehbein, 1659 Lakeland Circle, addressed Council and indicated that he has an
issue with the proposed assessment as his property is being assessed $8,000 per lot versus
the $4,330 of the other properties. He then indicated that his two issues are that the
assessment cannot be more than the benefit to the property and the second is that there
needs to be equity in how properties are looked at and they need to be assessed
comparably.
Mr. Rehbein indicated that he and Mr. Rich DeFoe have roughly the equivalent amount
of acreage and if he were to plat his property he would end up with the same number of
lots. He then said that he feels that he and Mr. DeFoe should have a more comparable
assessment. He further indicated that he feels that the nearly $9,000 per lot is more than
the value added to the property and is not equitable.
Council Member Nelson asked Mr. Rehbein what he thought would be a fair assessment.
Mr. Rehbein indicated that staying with the $4,330 it would add another $41,000 with a
balance of$112,000 and he feels it would be equitable to divide that in half between The
Shores and Mr. DeFoe.
City Attorney Hoell conunented that the benefit to the property could be determined in
court, if necessary. He then said that the argument concerning treating the lots equally
could be challenged because the City is within its right to treat different types of property
owners differently. For example, the residential property owners can be treated
differently from commercial property owners or developers.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated he felt the numbers presented may not take into account
enough of the benefit added to Mr. DeFoe's property. Mr. Peterson indicated the current
home on the DeFoe property takes up a sizeable amount of the property and he does not
think it would be possible to get 10 lots. Mr. Rehbein indicated that he has one lot that is
one acre and the others are 74 acre so he thinks the development would end up fairly
comparable. .
Page 13 of29
City of Centervi11e
November 13, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Cauncil Member Braussard Vickers asked if it wauld be best ta cantinue the public
hearing if any dallar amaunts are changed. City Attamey Haeft indicated that if
anyane's numbers were increased the City wauld need ta cantinue the hearing and
provide natice ta thase parties.
Mayar Swedberg cammented that Mr. DeFae cauld alsa put higher density hausing an
his partian .of the property such as twinbames due ta the way it is zaned naw.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the Mayor had argued against twinbomes
for the last development and she does not want to encaurage an assessment that would
push a property owner ta propose higher density ta recaup the casts .of the assessment.
Mr. Peterson indicated the developer paid 50% to extend sewer and water for Hunter's
Crossing.
Cauncil Member Capra indicated there was nat any commercial property in the path .of
that develapment but there is in this case. Mr. Petersan indicated that Mr. Rehbein would
be paying 39.5% .of the casts ta get the way ta the praperty and then he wauld be
respansible ta pay for the 300 feet .of additianallength ta run it inta the develapment. He
then commented that the minutes reflect that Mr. Rehbein was .okay with a figure of
$4,800 per lat far a tatal .of $48,000 and said the water was driven by the develapment.
Mayar Swedberg cammented that the document anticipates an interest rate of 8% and he
feels that amount is usuriaus as it is not supparted by what the prevailing market rates
are. Ms. Maare-Sykes indicated the City has used 8% far all assessments regardless of
whether the interest rates are higher .or lawer. She then said that it wauld pose a prablem
ifthe City were ta lower the interest far this develapment and did nat da sa far the others.
Cauncil Member Braussard Vickers suggested changing 7281 to $20,000 and leave the
ather piece at 6 units. The additianal $12,000 wauld be added anta the cammercial
praperty and wauld bring the Shares amaunt ta appraximately $65,000.
Mr. Rehbein asked Cauncil ta cansider the difference between having the water main in
frant .of DeFae's property and the water main run ta the carner .of his praperty. He then
said it wauld have saved him money ta have the water main rurming alang the frant of his
praperty.
Cauncil Member Broussard Vickers cammented that the value .of the lats in that
development is far different and it distresses her ta see Mr. Rehbein fighting the
assessment as she feels Cauncil was straightforward all alang when discussing the
assessment. She further cammented that it seemed ta her that Council had reached a
cansensus with Mr. Rehbein .only ta have him shaw up at this late date and contest the
amaunts.
Cauncil Member Broussard Vickers said she feels Cauncil shauld do samething a little
different an the commercial property but it disturbs her at this paint because she felt the
Page 14 af29
City of Centerville
November 13, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
City worked well to do the right thing all the way around. Mr. Rehbein indicated that at
the last discussion Council requested he agree to a certain assessment and he felt that was
too high and Council debated over whether to proceed and made the decision to go ahead
with the project not knowing whether or not he would contest the assessment. He further
commented that he feels the City could do more to make it more equitable.
Council Member Capra indicated the range was between $40,000 and $60,000. Mr.
Rehbein indicated he was prepared to pay the $56,000 as he feels that is fair and
equitable.
Council Member Nelson indicated she was not able to find any notes from the discussion
that would indicate that Council discussed assessing any more than $65,000 to The
Shores.
Mayor Swedberg asked for a recommendation of the City Attorney. City Attorney Hoeft
said it sounds like Council wants to change the numbers. He then said Council needs to
determine how it wants to adjust the numbers and provide adequate notice of any change
to property owners. He then recommended changing the numbers based on the total
proj ect rather than picking and choosing properties.
Council Member Nelson indicated Council agreed on the commercial property being
$20,000 and she thought Council had agreed that The Shores was to be assessed $65,000
with Dafoe 6 units for $27,859 for a total of$57,859.
Council Member Capra indicated she had $3,200 times 10 homes and then DeFoe and
The Shores at $60,000. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that would be the
equivalent of20 lots at the same price and that would not hold.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she did not want to be put in a position of
being asked to look at a plat with higher density because of what has been assessed.
Mayor Swedberg suggested the City pick up the difference between the $27,859 and the
$25,977.
Council Member Broussard Vickers cautioned that the City does not know whether Mr.
Rehbein would fight the $65,000 and it puts the City in the position of another possible
property owner contesting the assessment.
Council Member Travis commented that there have been discussions to indicate that Mr.
DeFoe's property is not always going to be a bar so there is reasoning behind the
assessment.
Council Member Broussard Vickers recommended moving the commercial property to
$20,000 and that extra amount would come out of the Mound Trail assessment dropping
.it from $77,923 to $66,582 and would increase Water Works to $45,977.
Page 15 of29 .
City of Centerville
November 13, 2002
Council Meeting Mjnutes
Council Member Broussard Vickers also said she could be persuaded to use 7 units for
the other DeFoe property and then dividing the remaining costs but she would not go for
8 or 9 units.
Council Member Nelson indicated she was fine with the $43,000 for residents, The
Shores at $66,582 and DeFoe at $45,977.
Mayor Swedberg indicated that it may not be possible for Council to decide this to equity
so it may have to go to the court system. He further commented that he does not want the
individual property owners to go beyond the $4,330.
Council Member Capra suggested using 7 lots for DeFoe and that would be $30,310,
moving the commercial property to $20,000 and The Shores would be $62,252. Council
Member Broussard Vickers commented that the recommendation would give the benefit
to The Shores she feels it would be equitable and close to the maximwn assessment of
$60,000.
Motion by Council Member Nelson, seconded by Council Member Capra to
continue the hearinl! with the followinl! proposed amounts: Individual residents
would remain at $4,330, The Shores $62,252, 7265 Main Street would be $30,310,
and 7281 Main Street would be $20,000 for a total of $155,859 and the City's
portion would be $41,760.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated that, technically because the amounts are not increasing to
the residents and Rehbein is decreasing it would not be necessary to re-notice them but he
recommended doing so.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if Staff had received any other comments.
Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she had not.
Council Member Broussard Vickers suggested adding bold language to the notice that
residents must attend the meeting to contest the assessment if they intend to do so.
VOTE: All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Swedberg indicated the matter would be continued to the December 9, 2002
meeting.
6. Pheasant Marsh Phase I Special Assessments and Resolution 02-057
Mayor Swedberg opened the public hearing at 9:30 p.m.
Mr. Peterson indicated that he had met with representatives from Pheasant Marsh at City
Hall today and they have issues with the assessments.
Page 16 of29
City of Centerville
November 13,2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Ms. Karen Marty, the attorney for Ground Development addressed Council and indicated
that Ground Development was not notified within 10 days of the meeting and has
difficulty understanding the numbers. She then indicated that they met with
representatives of the City today and would like the hearing continued to allow time for
the City to provide further information.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked when the first payment is due. Ms. Paulseth
indicated that the City is attempting to have the amounts certified to the County by
November 15,2002 which is the statutory deadline but Staff received permission to send
it in up to a month later.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if the City would lose interest by delaying
interest. Ms. Paulseth indicated the City would lose no money by doing this.
Mayor Swedberg asked what the question was. Ms. Marty indicated that they are
concerned with the bills for round figures and would like detail as to the actual invoices.
Council Member Broussard Vickers pointed out that Ground Development has waived all
rights to object to any amount less than $1.82 million. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that
was correct.
Ms. Marty indicated Ground Development has waived the objection to $1.8 for three
phases but they may need to file a contingent objection if the three phases come in over
that amount.
City Attorney Hoeft clarified that the number included all three phases but said he
disagreed with Council and said that what they could object to is an assessment over and
above the $1.8 million and mayor may not be successful. He then said that an objection
has no relevance with the Phase I assessments.
Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Ms. Paulseth is working on providing the numbers with
Mr. Peterson. Ms. Paulseth indicated that the discussion is over approximately $3,000 at
this point.
Motion by Mayor Swedbere:. seconded by Council Member Nelson to approve
Resolution 02-057. a Resolution Adoptine the Assessment Roll for Pheasant Marsh,
Phase I.
Council Member Travis said he feels they have a right to find out what they are being
billed for.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she would be fine with continuing it for
two weeks ifit did not cost the City any money.
Page 17 of29
City of Centerville
November 13, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the number in the resolution would not change
regardless of whether they receive clarification on the $3,000. He further clarified that
the amount may be reflected in the Phase II assessments but would not affect Phase 1.
Ms. Patty Woolfrey-Flatten, 6814 Grouse Hollow, indicated she had received a letter
from the City indicating they owed $30,000. She then indicated she had contacted the
City Clerk and was told that she needed to attend the meeting to object to the assessment.
She then indicated she had sat through three hours of meeting only to find out that she did
not need to be concerned with the assessment because it involves the builder and
developer not her.
Ms. Flatten indicated she did not like the demeanor of the conversation with the City
Clerk and said she did not feel very welcome as a new resident to Centerville.
Mayor Swedberg apologized for the misunderstanding.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked why the assessment notice was mailed to the
property owners. City Attorney Hoeft indicated the City is required to do so to comply
with the statute.
Council Member Capra recommended checking with the builder of the house and then
said the clerk should have provided more information on this matter.
Council Member Broussard Vickers commented that her manner might not have been
right but the clerk was erring on the side of caution because the notice does not say
Ground Development.
Mayor Swedberg asked that, in the future, this type of question be answered by the City
Administrator rather than the City Clerk.
Ms. Flatten said she did not feel very welcome and when she asked to speak to someone
beyond the Clerk she was given names but not telephone numbers and was not
transferred.
Mayor Swedberg asked that the City Administrator assure that this never happens again.
Council Member Travis commented that it is his understanding that the figures are
estimates and there would be an over under at the end that squares up the estimated
numbers. He then said he has no problem with the assessment because he knows they
will have a chance to justify the numbers.
Ms. Marty indicated her review suggests that some of the numbers are wrong and high
and that is why she is asking that this be continued.
VOTE: Aves - 3, Navs -2(Travis/Broussard Vickers). Motion carried.
Page 18 of29
City of Centerville
November 13,2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Ms. Marty indicated that they have no recourse other than to object to the assessments at
this point. She then presented the Mayor with a formal objection.
Mayor Swedberg read the objection for the record.
Council Member Capra asked that Staff verify the 10-day claim made in the objection
letter.
V. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Quebec Street Drainage Issues
Council Member Capra indicated she had spoken to Mr. Palzer and found that the other
major drainage issue is Center Street but the problem on Quebec Street is that residents
have no place to pump sump water that does not affect either the neighbors or the street.
Council Member Capra provided information on other things the City has done to assist
with drainage and suggested that assisting the residents on Quebec Street could be funded
through the storm water fund.
Council Member Capra indicated she had discussed the matter with Mr. Powers and his
neighbor Mary and while she does not agree that the City should pay for everything they
have asked for she does feel the City needs to assist these residents with the water
problem. She then said she would like to look into using storm water funds to ruu pipe to
the back of that lot line and go as far west as the last house on that block.
Council Member Nelson indicated she objects to doing this with this street unless the
City does it for Center Street as well.
Council Member Capra indicated there is no existing storm water pipe on Center Street
and noted that the street would be redone in the near future and the water issues could be
rectified at that time.
Mayor Swedberg indicated he did not care what was done as long as it was equitable.
Council Member Capra indicated that one property owner on Eagle Trail filled in his lot
and that affected the drainage on Eagle Trail. She then commented that Mr. Powers has
mold growing in his backyard because the water never drains.
Mayor Swedberg indicated he understood the question but feels the City needs to take
care of issues like this for the entire City or leave it up to the private property owner.
Council Member Capra indicated the problem creates a hazard in the street because there
is no place to put the water where it does not impede upon someone else.
L __ ___
Page 19 of29
City ofCenterville
November 13, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Mr. Glen Powers, 1870 Quebec Street, indicated this issue has been going on for the last
two (2) years and he has had standing water in his backyard all summer with mold
growing that his daughter is allergic to. He then indicated he put in 18 yards of dirt and it
has all washed away. He further commented that he has to have the City come out and
plow out the base of his driveway because he has had three foot ice dams at1he end.
Mr. Powers indicated that Mr. Palzer has said that the development was built without a
1 % grade as is required by City Ordinance and he would like the City's help in fixing the
problem. He then indicated that he and his neighbors are prepared to sue the City if that
becomes necessary.
Council Member Capra indicated the property owners have good intentions and want to
remove water from their property but there is no place for it to go.
A resident in the audience commented that she had asked to put drain tiling in and was
told no because it would flow to the street.
Council Member Capra indicated that the City has had to go in and rectify issues with
major ice buildup that creates a safety hazard.
Ms. Donna Macoskey, 1848 Quebec Street, commented that both of her neighbors built
up their yards with dirt and she is lower than her neighbors.
Ms. Macoskey, 1848 Quebec Street, indicated she had given her name and address to
Staffto be added to the list with water issues on Quebec Street.
Council Member Broussard Vickers commented that the actions of the neighbors are
making her water problem worse.
Mayor Swedberg said he is concerned that Council makes a decision on something and
then decides to revisit that decision. He then asked what Council had decided on this
matter. Mr. Peterson indicated he had done a quote that was fairly high and not a good
solution to the problem. He then suggested getting further quotes for doing the work next
spring as part of another project to get a better price.
Council Member Capra indicated the scope of this is much larger than the two lots.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the City has the option of doing the work
and assessing homeowners but said the City does not have the funds to solve drainage
issues all over the City.
Mayor Swedberg indicated he is concerned with consistency because Council has told so
many homeowners no. He then said he would like to set a policy of making it right and
assessing for it or cost sharing whatever Council sees fit but a policy is needed.
Page 20 of29
City of Centerville
November 13, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Council Member Broussard Vickers said it was not possible to make a unilateral policy
because the situations are not the same and these residents cannot relieve the water issue
without the help ofthe City.
Council Member Capra indicated the other residents had places to get the water off of
their property.
Council Member Nelson indicated that Council told Center Street there was nothing the
City could do for them. Mr. Peterson indicated there is no storm sewer in Center Street.
He then said the City is not able to put a pipe on Center Street because there is no place
for it to go.
Motion by Council Member Capra, seconded by Council Member Travis to direct
Staff to further investieate tbe drainaee problem on Quebec Street up to 1836
Quebec Street and place the matter back on Council's aeenda for discussion
concernine the potential costs as well as notifyine residents.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked whether residents were interested in cost
sharing on the project. Mr. Powers indicated he was not willing to pay anything nor is
his neighbor Mary.
.
Ms. Sue Hines, 1836 Quebec Street, indicated she would cost share in an attempt to
finally resolve the issue.
VOTE: Ayes - 3, Nays - 2(Nelson/Swedbere). Motion carried.
2. Historical Society's Request for Artist/Crafter for the Submission of a Holiday
Ornament from the City of Centerville
Council Member Capra indicated the Historical Society had asked the City to provide an
ornament for 2002 and she would like approval to work with Staff to locate a local
artisan.
Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council Member
Nelson to approve up to $40 for the cost of a 2002 Centerville ornament. All in
favor. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Proposed Historical Downtown District
Council Member Capra indicated that federal funds are intending on being used for the
purpose of widening County Road 14 (Main Street) and restrictions exist on the usage of
these funds when it involves impacting a historic district. She then suggested setting a
meeting with residents to discuss designating an area of downtown as historic.
Page 21 of29
1_- _ _ _
City ofCenterville
November 13,2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Council Member Capra asked Council what area it would like to recommend to be
declared an historical district. She then indicated that it would take 51% of business or
property owners to oppose the declaration.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she would like to have a meeting with
residents to determine interest before contacting Ms. McDonald.
Council Member Capra suggested an area from St. Genevieve Cemetery to the bend in
the road.
Motion bv Conncil Member Capra, seconded by Council Member Broussard
Vickers to set UP a meeting to discuss the possibility of decIarine a portion of
downtown an historic site in order to determine the interest ofproper!y owners.
Ayes - 4, Nays - O. Motion carried. Council Member Nelson was not present for
the vote.
Council recessed at 10:19 p.m.
Council reconvened at 10:21 p.m.
4. Resolution #02-055 Capital and General Expenditure Policy & Internal Controls
Procedure
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she objects to the $2,500. City Attorney
Hoeft indicated the statutory limit is $15,000.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she felt the $2,500 would be burdensome
for Staff. Mayor Swedberg suggested getting three quotes if the City is going to
capitalize goods.
Council Member Capra asked ifthe City would do the same for services.
Motion by Mayor Swedbere, seconded by Council Member Nelson to approve
Resolution #02-055, a Capital and General Expenditure Policy and Internal Control
Procedure with services added.
Council Member Capra asked if there was a time frame that supplies are ordered within.
She then explained she had been told there seems to be a lag time with getting supplies
ordered. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Staff does inventory and purchasing once per
month so if the deadline is not met then they do have to wait for the next time supplies
are ordered.
Council Member Capra indicated she would like to say supplies would be ordered
approximately monthly. Council Member Nelson indicated she would not want that in
the document and suggested that Staff talk to the City Administrator if there is an issue.
There was Council consent to leave a time frame out of the document.
Page 22 of29
City of Centerville
November 13,2002
Council Meeting Minutes
VOTE: Aves - 4, Navs -l(Broussard Vickers). Motion carried.
5. Liquor License Renewal- 2003
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded bv Council Member
Travis to approve the liquor license renewals for 2003 for Richard A. DeFoe Ent.,
Inc. dba Water Works Beach Club, Mountain Enterprises, Inc. dba, Trio Inn,
SaHawk, Inc. dba Saeer's Liquor and Wise\!uvs Pizza, Inc. based on approval bv
the Police Chief and completion of all required information.
Mayor Swedberg asked if the licensees were going to follow the best practices. Ms.
Moore-Sykes indicated she met with the license holders to discuss the requirements and
the liquor license holders felt it would be a good idea to have other business owners be
privy to the information shared.
Council Member Nelson asked if Ms. Moore-Sykes had the 40-point selection in her
office. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she did have it.
VOTE: All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
6. Tobacco License Renewal- 2003
Mayor Swedberg indicated the Police Chiefis recommending that Tom Thumb's license
to sell tobacco products not be renewed.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded bv Council Member
Nelson to fine Kellv's Korner $500 for a second violation of sellin\! tobacco to an
undera\!e person. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded bv Council Member
Nelson to fine Tom Thumb $750 for a third violation of sellin\! tobacco to an
undera\!e person. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded bv Council Member
Nelson to deny the renewal of Tom Thumb's tobacco license based on the
recommendation of the Police Chief due to repeated violations of sellin\! tobacco to
minors.
City Attorney Hoeft reminded Council that the City would need to notify Tom Thumb
that the license would not be renewed as well as a notice that they may appeal the
decision.
Council Member Capra expressed concern with the recent decision by the City of
Burnsville to revoke the tobacco license of SuperAmerica as it was overturned in the
Page 23 of29
City ofCenterville
November 13, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
courts, City Attorney Hoeft indicated he did not know the facts of that case but said the
City is within its rights to deny renewal based on violation of the ordinance,
Council Member Capra indicated she would not vote to deny as she would like to table
consideration of the renewal to allow time to investigate the case in Burnsville.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated that Torn Thumb is entitled to due process and, if they
cannot be heard by Council before the end of the year, he would recommend issuing a
conditional license to sell tobacco pending the determination of the appeaL
VOTE: Ayes - 4, Nays -l(Capra), Motion carried.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council Member
Capra to approve the tobacco licenses for Corner Express and Sal!er's LiQuors. All
in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
7, Parks and Recreation Committee Recommendations
Motion bv Mayor Swedberl!, seconded bv Council Member Broussard Vickers to
approve the recommendations of the Parks and Recreation Committee.
Council Member Travis expressed concern that this would be tying up the ice for a lot of
time.
Council Member Nelson asked that committees provide an explanation with their
recommendations in the future.
VOTE: All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
8. Mrs. Gina Paar' s Request for "Dead End" and "Slow-Watch for Children or
"Slow - Children at Plav" Signs
Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Mrs. Gina Paar had requested to be heard before Council
on a request for "dead end" and "slow, watch for children" or "slow, children at play"
signs. She then indicated she had done some research and provided in packets frequently
asked questions from the City of Shoreview that provide some information on such a
request.
Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she was concerned that the addition of the signs would give
parents in the neighborhood a false sense of security that drivers would actually slow
down and that could lead to a terrible accident. She then indicated that her
recommendation would be to ask the police department to step up patrol in the area and
have residents take down license plate numbers as well as submitting the petition for
consideration and recommendation to the police chief.
Page 24 of29
City of Centerville
November 13,2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Council Member Capra indicated she would agree to the "dead end" sign on Meadow
Court as the cul-de-sac should be posted.
Motion by Mayor Swedberl!, seconded by Council Member Nelson to approve the
"dead end" sien on Meadow Court as requested. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
Motion by Mayor Swedbere, seconded by Council Member Travis to approve the
"slow, children at play" sien as requested on Meadow Lane at both ends.
Council Member Nelson indicated she would like the sign wording to be brief because
there is not time to read many words when passing the sign.
Mayor Swedberg indicated that Staff would determine the appropriate signage to be used
based on the universal standard.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she was concerned that the City has no
recommendation from the police department and there is information from another City
indicating that it may not be a good idea to add these types of signs. She then said she
would like to hear what the police chief has to say as well as obtain information on the
costs of adding the signs in many other parts of town.
Council Member Capra indicated she would like to have the request reviewed by the
Police Chief. She then said that she realizes the importance of getting people to slow
down but she is not sure that the signs would improve the situation and the City would be
faced with adding signs every time one is requested.
Mrs. Paar indicated that the police patrol the neighborhood quite a bit. She then
explained that she wants people to know that there are a lot of children in the
development.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked why residents are speeding III their own
neighborhood if they are aware of the number of children.
Mrs. Paar indicated that residents of the area do not speed, it is the cut through traffic
from Eagle Pass to CentervilIe Road. She then said that she hopes the sign will get more
people to slow down before a kid gets hurt.
VOTE: Ayes - 3, Nays - 2(Broussard Vickers/Capra). Motion carried.
Motion by Mayor Swedbere, seconded by Council Member Nelson to direct staff to
contact the Police Chief to request increased patrol for speedine in the
neiehborhood in question on Meadow Lane. Ayes - 4, Nays - l(Broussard Vickers),
Motion carried.
9. Ordinance #70 and #71
Page 25 of29
City ofCenterville
November 13,2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Council Member Nelson requested the following changes: On Page 7 of 13, Section b
Council had agreed to set a time limit of 9:00 p.m. not 11 :00 p.m. On Page 8, Section b
she asked that the word habitual be deleted. Council agreed to the changes.
Council Member Nelson indicated that something needed to be added concerning a
failure to employ a certain number of employees graduated from an accredited institution.
Council Member Broussard Vickers suggested defining masseuse and masseur as a
person who has had the training and has obtained certification from an accredited
institution.
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Capra to
approve Ordinance #70 as amended.
Council Member Capra asked if Staff had looked into the state insurance requirements.
Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated Staff would do so. City Attorney Hoeft asked if the City
wants to set a requirement if the state has none.
Council Member Broussard Vickers suggested referencing the state requirement. City
Attorney Hoeft suggested adding that insurance is required per state statute.
VOTE: All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Council Member Nelson suggested the following changes: On Page 2, the reference to
ear piercing guns was to be removed. On Page 12, indicate that the application fee is
nonrefundable and delete section d under persons not eligible for licensure.
Council Member Capra indicated that the same language should be used concerning
liability insurance.
Mayor Swedberg indicated that his concern was that this use could be within 500 feet of a
school. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the City is limiting where it allows
this type of use by limiting it to commercial property.
Mayor Swedberg indicated he would not want this type of use in a mixed-use district.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that Ordinance #4 would need to be
amended to add this as an allowed use in a Commercial zone. She then asked Staff to
add this change to the list of items to be changed on Ordinance #4.
Council Member Broussard Vickers pointed out a typographical error on Page 7 under
body painting it states "paining" and sbould be "painting."
Page 26 of29
- I
City of Centerville
November 13, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council Member
Nelson to approve Ordinance #71 as amended. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated Council made a motion that was not a
resolution concerning fining Tom Thumb and Kelly's. She then asked Staff to bring a
resolution to Council for approval, if necessary.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated it was not necessary but said Staff would bring a resolution
for approval as a matter of housekeeping.
VI. CONSENT AGENDA
1. The City of Centerville October 19, 2002 through November 13,2002 Claims for
Approval
2. Centennial Fire District Claims
3. Amt Construction Company, Pay Estimate #3 $75,915.52
Motion by Council Member Nelson, seconded by Council Member Broussard
Vickers to approve Consent Al!enda as presented. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
VII. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES
1. October 23. 2002 Council Meeting Minutes
Council Member Broussard Vickers requested the following change: On Page 8 change
the word "consensus" to "consent."
Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers seconded bv Council Member
Nelson to approve the October 23, 2002 Council Meetinl! Minutes as amended. All
in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
VIII. ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES
1. Personnel Policv Work Session
Council Member Nelson indicated she would like to set a date for the personnel work
seSSIOn.
Council Member Nelson indicated she would like to hold the executive session to discuss
the City Administrator's review following the work session on November 21,2002.
Page 27 of29
L _
City ofCentervil1e
November 13, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
Mayor Swedberg commented that he did not think it was possible to get a collective
evaluation and it was not collective last time.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated that it was appropriate to hold an executive session after
the work session as long as it is properly noticed.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated if there were any questions or issues the employment
attorney from his office would be able to stay to assist.
Council agreed to meet on November 21,2002 for a work session.
Motion bv Council Member Nelson, seconded by Mayor Swedberl! to direct Staff to
l!et someone in to look into the ventilation in the video room. All in favor. Motion
carried unanimously.
Council Member Nelson indicated that there was an article in the Hugonian indicating
there would be a public hearing on November 20, 2002 on the Goiffon Road matter.
Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the City does not post information in the Hugonian and
she is not sure where that information was obtained.
Council Member Nelson indicated Council had asked to have a public hearing on Goiffon
Road. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated notice was sent to the Quad today for November 27,
2002.
Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated the carpet at City Hall is in need of cleaning. She then
indicated Staff had obtained quotes and the low bid was $350 to clean all the carpets at
City HalL
Motion by Mayor Swedberl!, seconded bv Council Member Nelson to authorize
Staff to have the carpets cleaned at City Hall usinl! the lowest bid. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimously.
2. 1540 Peltier Lake Drive
Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that six or seven roll off dumpsters have been filled and
taken away from the property as the family continues to make progress on cleaning the
home.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated he had driven past the home and the lights were on and
there were not things stacked in front of the windows making it apparent that progress is
being made.
Council Member Capra asked if the family had been given a time franle to complete the
work. City Attorney Hoeft indicated a time frame had not been set but there was an
Page 28 of29
L--__________._ _._ __
City of Centerville
November 13, 2002
Council Meeting Minutes
agreement that fOlward progress must be made. He then said that the family is anxious to
clean the home and move the resident back into the home.
Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that water service would need to be established before
anyone would be allowed to live at the residence.
3. Capital Proiects
City Attorney Hoeft indicated that developers were sent a last chance letter and only one
response was received so his office has begun preparing complaints for service. He then
indicated that there is a question of who is responsible on the CenterVilla development
and that is being researched.
4. Building Permit Fee Update
Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated Council had asked Staff to provide information on how the
building permit fee was determined and Staff continues to work on that. She then
indicated that she met with Mr. Rehbein and explained the differences between his
building permit for his residence in The Shores and the building permit issued for Mr.
Carl Buechler's residence in Buechler Estates and they were able to come to an
agreement.
IX. ADJOURNMENT.
Motion by Council Member Nelson seconded by Council Member Broussard
Vickers to adiourn tbe November 13, 2002 City council meetine: at 11:14 p.m. All in
favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Transcribed by:
Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
Page 29 of29
.
,
BUILDING PERMIT FEE REVIEW
CITY OF CENTERVlllE
Population
3,202
Built Out
Square Miles
Residential Equivalency Unit (REU)
Water Meter
Stonn Sewer
Water Hook-up
Service Availability Charge (SAC)
Site Maintenance
Pennit Fees
Plan Review
No
2.2 Approx.
2,000.00
290.00
200.00
1,500.00
1 ,200.00
225.00
1997 USC Schedule + 25%
65% of permit fee set by-UBC for commercial
carried over to residential
State Mandated
(
"1
. ,
Surcharge
Other Charges
Escrow
Sewer & Water Hook-up (Inspection)
Sewer, Water & Utility Pennit
Excavation
Furnace/A.C.IW.H. Pennit
Value Permit Fee
400,000.00 11,130.04
It should be noted that Cities were surveyed as to their fees charged for new, residential
building permits only. Some other communities have special assessments automatically
associated with each development for sealcoating, water/sewer, etc. that are above and
beyond the permit fees.
CITY OF FOREST LAKE CITY OF HUGO
6,798 6,363
No No
N/A (REC) 2,000
251.00 + Tax 275.00
N/A N/A
875.00 2,000.00
1,400.00 2,000.00
N/A N/A
1997 UBC Schedule 1994 USC Schedule c.--
UBC% UBC%
State Mandated State Mandated
2,500.00 Silt Fence for
1 st five homes in plat
50.00 for 1 or both
25.00
Value Permit Fee
400,000.00 9,613.96
CITY OF L1NO LAKES
CITY OF OSSEO
Population
16,791
2,434
(Not Issuing S-F Dwelling Permits)
Yes - Land Locked
1 approx.
475.00 Sewer Connection
210.10
NJA
1,260.00
1,200.00
N/A
1997 use Schedule
Hired Out (Midwest)
Built Out
Square Miles
Residential Equivalency Unit (REU)
Water Meter
Storm Sewer
Water Hook-up
Service Availability Charge (SAC)
Site Maintenance
Pennit Fees
Plan Review
No
N/A
272.00 + Tax
100.00
125.00
1,200.00
N/A
1997 USC Schedule
65% of permit fee set by UBe
Surcharge
State Mandated
State Mandated
other Charges
Escrow
$500.00 Sod, Utility Billing, Curb & Gutter
Sewer & Water Hook-up (Inspection)
35.00
Sewer, Water & Utility Permit
Excavation
100 + 10,000 Bond
Fumace/A.e./W.H. Permit
-.......,.
"
'\
\
Value Permit Fee
400,000.00 7,200.00'
,
"
,.//
It should be noted tha1 Cities were surveyed as to their fees charged for new, residential
building permits only. Some other communities have special assessments automa1ically
associated with each development for sealcoating, water/sewer, etc. that are above and
beyond the permit fees.
.
CITY OF SPRING LAKE PARK
6,772 2002
10 New Homes
Almost 60 New Townhomes
2.25 approx.
N/A
235.15
N/A
500.00
1,200.00
N/A
1997 use Schedule
State Mandated
145.00
105.00
45.00
Value Pennit Fee
400,000.00 7,986.00
City of Centerville Charges and Breakdown of Dollars
Residential Equivalency Unit (REU)
Water Meter
Storm Sewer
Water Hook-up
SAC
Site Maintenance
Trunk Fees, Cover Costs for Oversizing & Lift Stations
Cost
Surface Water Treatment
Wells, Water Towers, Looping, Hydrants & Fire Protection
Met. Council
Escrow ($200) + $25 Administrative Fee
AIte4deA~, 11te.
6433 20th Ave. So. . Lino Lakes, MN 55038' (651) 429-7005
MATT VESEL
Black Topping' Resurfacing' Patching' Bob Cat Grading
Crushed Rock' Snow Plowing & Removal
Work to be performed at fVv.JJ.rMA iU,
Name_OW\- ~lf(>t~~
Address~ - J>tS4- N. i4-t ~-\- ~t~M (VvA/ 5S113
c~ a~/- 1tr4-/J-f3
Telephone C(r+ - t c.. r--53 b ~
City (\~.'<- (..s( -fTt - t 4tJ? F *
We hereby propose to complete the job to the satisfaction of our customers. All material is guaranteed. Our price
includes all excavating, grading. gravel and blacktop. It includes only the finest quality materials; limerock
(Dolomite) for base, and blacktop which meets Highway Specifications of 2341 or 2331 Wear, Hot AC 5%-6%
oil with 1/2"-3/4" rock used in the blacktop. This product will be used unless stated above.
5 YEAR GUARANTEE ON
WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS.
DUE TO THE EXTREME TEMPERATURE
CHANGES IN MINNESOTA, WE CAN NOT
GUARANTEE AGAINST FROST CRACKS.
A.-ea to be blacktopped. graveled. excavated-
Total square feet:
Inches of gravel: 2 3 4 5 6 or as needed
Inches of blacktop after compaction:
123
Complete price for above work:
$
Full payment to be made on completion of work,
unless other arrangements have been made.
Prices are subject to change after 60 days.
Customer
1M loon
Estimator ~.~
€ 1t!r13MUIOJ
Date
Special Instructions:
Movd lfU.- ~cY\J ~ ~A-i~ ,
S{9() )(' &b - II, {C:D 0 F-~
j i ~ YVWVi * ftp~~ce. ~ WWv't -J \ 0+
~AJ. WIY'o' ~ ~ IA c.e lV \ \:t.- r \ 9 V wJvllN\
b~hJv:ll ~I.\ ~o~d C\.A-ss S~
r
,If] 1/YJ C) ,
~ SOU-
(
~ _ ~'S.\4ll beo ,C9v(~,
S . !-Al[ 41.l d~4l ~ ~\k ~
~\WO h~ -6 ddr oaD_
\1\/ .J 4b 5~ 500
~~ )-
.----..
\)oeS WcK ':R4::-\cVe.-~\c~ J:e~~l" W ~ kL
~ ~ \~ C;~\-<t ~M.ll~"l~ 'tu L
Gt\! \0111 ~,
,..';1..""",
;i
I
_____u____ _..
FYI
!
t
ld.
RICHARD A. MERFJLL
DARRELL A. JENSEN
JEFFREY S. JOHNSON
RUSSELL H. CROWDER
JON P. ERICKSON
THOMAS P. MALONE
MICHAEL F. HURLEY
DOUGLAS G. SAUTER
HERMAN L. TALLE
CHARLES M. SEYKORA
DANIEL D. GANTER, JR.
BEVERLY K. DODGE
JAMES D. HOEFT
JOAN M. QUADE
JOHN T. BUCHMAN
-~,",-
SCOTT M. LEPAK
STEVEN G. THORSON
ELIZABETH A. $CHADING
WILUAM F. HUEFNER
BRADLEY A. KLETSCHER
KRISTI R. RILEY
CHERYL A JORGENSEN
WILLIAM D. SIEGEL
JENNlFER C. THULIEN SMITH
KARIN E. SIMONSON
MATTHEW A. KOROGI
Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
400 N orthtown Financial Plaza
200 Coon Rapids Boulevard
Minneapolis, MN 55433-5894
(763) 780-8500 FAX (763) 780-1777
1-800-422-3486
www.bgslaw.com
Of Counsel
.ROBERT A GUZY
BERNARD E. STEFFEN
1931_2002
Writer's Direct Line: (763) 783-5122
Internet E-Mail Address:jhoeft@bgslaw.com
November 19, 2002
Charles A. Ramsay, Esq.
Ramsay, DeVore & Olson
2860 Snelling Avenue N
Roseville, MN 55113
VIA FAX NO. 651-604-0027
RE: Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis
Court File No. Cl-98-9305
Dear Mr. Ramsay:
I have received confirmation that the City of Centerville will be paying $3,000 to Mr. Genin for
the value of his automobile. By copy of this letter to the City Administrator, she will direct that
a check be issued to Mr. Terrance L. Genin and forward it to your office on his behalf.
Sincere! y,
JDH:set
cc: Kim Moore-Sykes, City of Centerville
,
/
CHIEF'S REPORT
OCTOBER 2002
I appreciated the opportunity to attend some of the International Chief s of Police
Conference held at the :Minneapolis Convention Center during the first part of October.
The Minneapolis Police Department did an excellent job of hosting the conference and
provided satellite parking and shuttle service for those commuting from the metro area.
As many of you are aware, former Commissioner Rick Anderson was in charge of St.
Paul Police Department's assistance and so he basically lived at the convention center
during the conference. I enjoyed meeting him for lunch one of the conference days.
The Salvation Army hosted a volunteer appreciation dinner for bell ringers on October
1 st Administration Assistant Rismoen, Deputy Chief Makela, my wife and I were able to
attend aIld were shown their appreciation for our assistance in their kettle campaign.
They also acknowledged the generosity of a Centennial Lakes Police Officer who
provided cab fare for a "forgotten" hired bell ringer.
North Metro Cable 15 stopped by the department inquiring about a 1991 case I had
worked on as an investigator. They were, in conjunction with the Anoka Historical
Society, doing a warlock piece and were curious about the grave tampering and thefts
that occurred in Centerville in 1991. It took some digging (no pun intended) but I was
grateful we were able locate the department files and my notes from our storage area at
theLexington sub-station. You may have caught the interview on Cablel5.
Training during the month included an intoxilyzer refresher course attended by Officer
Stepan, the International Chiefs conference (several line officer courses were offered
free of charge as well as adinission to the expo center for all officers of a member
agency) of which our Cpl.'s attended and a conflict management course attended by our
Cpl.'s.
Officers and staff enjoyed 15 days of vacation, 5 holidays, and 4 comp days off during
the month of October and found it necessary to use 4 'l2 sick days.
Meetings I attended included our regularly scheduled commission meeting, two
departmental meetings, an Anoka County Joint Law Enforcement Council meeting, a
ACJLEC TAC meeting (800 MHz), a county-wide emergency planning meeting,
Lexington and Circle Pines city council meetings with Anoka County Attorney Bob M.A.
Johnson, Anoka Chief s with Deputy Chief Makela, a weekly review meeting with a
trainee and his FTO, a meeting with an eligible law enforcement candidate inquiring
about the job market, our meeting with labor relations, and several meetings with the
Deputy Chief and officers.
cm Investigator Tom Teale retired from the Anoka Co. Sheriff's office and is now
working for the State of MN. Deputy Chief Makela and I attended a short retirement
program held in his honor. Tom greatly assisted our community as a cm investigator and
drug task force officer. We wish him all the best in his new position.
j-
Centennial Lakes Police Department
200 Civic Heighff; Circle, Circle Pines, MN550I4 (763) 784-2501 Fax (763) 784.-0082
AGENDA FOR THE CENTENNIAL LAKES JOINT POLICE COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 14, 2002
CENTERVILLE CITY HALL
THE MEETING WILL CONVENE AT 7:00'P.H.
1. CALL TO ORDER..
2. ROLL CALL.
3. PUBLIC FORUM - 7:05p.m.
4. Workshop - Centennial Lakes PD Goals ~ Continuing Discussion.
*, See Action Item 'D.
5. COMMISSIONERS', COMMENTS.
6. CONSENT AGENDA - Consent Agenda items will be act"d on.with one motion
unless a 'Commis'sioner. ~e9ues ts thei'r' placement on the regular ag~nda._
A., Approval Of Minutes. of October 10,' 2002', Regular Commission
Mee ting - Page 6.
. B. Monthly,Financial Report - October, 200i c Page 9.
C. Ratification Of , October 2002,Expenses - Pag~ 15.
7. ACTION ITEMS:'
A. Approval Of R & RManual, 'Chapter 86, Minnesota Data Practices
Act - R~sponse From Centerville' City Attorney -rage 20.
B. Commission Secretary - rage 21.
1. Timesavers.
2. Other Possibilities.
02.
Nov. 14, 2002
Page Two
C. Towing Contract - 2003 - 2004 - Page 22.
D. Planning Session - Page 31.
8. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS:
A. Update on Task Force to Review Commission Make-Up.
B. Monthly Activity Report, September, 2002- Pa"ge 32.
G. Monthly Department Summaries, October, 2002 ~"Page 34.
D. Anoka County/Centennial Lakes Area Crash "Facts - Page 45.
E. Article IACP Magazine c Remodel" or Build Anew - Page 49.
F. CDPD. Changes -Page 52.
G. ATR Failure to Respond/Aut?medic~ Bill. ~Page 54.
H.: ATR -10~i1-02 "~ 1102-227731 - 0107 Hours - Failure to Respond"
" Automedic.s Handle"d (DUl Tow).
.1. ATR- 10-31-02 - Failure To Respond c Page 56.
9.
EXECUTIVE CLOSED SESSION - The
conduct the" Chief's U Evaluation
contra~t 'negotiations.
purpose of
and upda te
this session 'will b~ to
the Commf'ssion' -on union
10. ADJOURNMENT
o
Unapproved Minutes
Centennial Lakes Police Commission Meeting
October 10, 2002
At Centerville City Hall
Minutes prepared by Tim Swedberg
The first order of business was the swearing-in ceremony of Officer Scott Michael
Arntzen by Vice-Chair Pitchford. Family, friends, members of the Department and the
Commission were present followed by refreshments and a cake. North Metro Cable 15
filmed the ceremony. The Department is now at full-strength.
1. The Meeting was called to order by Vice-Chair Pitchford at 7:30 PM.
2. Roll Call: (Members present were)
Vice-Chair Pitchford presided as Chair Karen Varian was out of the country.
Commissioner Korst
Commissioner Lund
Commissioner Simons
COmmissioner Heifort
Commissioner Mahr
Commissioner Grahek
Commissioner Swedberg
Commissioner \^Jrlght vv'as ill
Ex Officio:
Chief Heckman
Presentations before the Commission
4. Anoka County Attorney M.A. Johnson gave a presentation on the new Public
Safety Communications Joint Powers Agreement.
The agreement will provide a county-wide 800 Mhz. Radio system for all police, fire and
other emergency personnel.
1;
5. Robert O'Brien leader of the Minnesota Safe and Sober Campaign presented a
digital Preliminary Breath Test Analyzer to Corporal Mike Jensen.
The department won the award in competition with Departments state-wide in support of
the safe and sober campaign to lower traffic fatalities. This marks the second year in
row that the Department has been recognized for its work in traffic safety awareness
and prevention. Deaths from traffic crashes result in hundreds of deaths every day
nationwide. Seatbelt usage in Minnesota is at 80%. Those who do not use seatbelts
are involved in 69% of fatal crashes.
6. Public Forum
There were no citizens present for the public forum.
Workshop Continued from Previous Meeting
7. Commissioner Simmons lead a brief discussion of examples of the scale/scoring
system he has presented over the last several meetings. It appeared that the
Commission was willing to try the new approach as goals were developed in the
future.
8. Commissioners' Comments
Simmons - commented on the success of the defibrilators and the saving of a life
recently.
Korst - commented on speed issues in Circle Pines and a individual sleeping in a car
on a residential street. The Chief said the county gave them the radar wagon, but the
newest equipment is capable of noting the time of speeding which can aid the
Department in focusing enforcement at specific times. The unit costs $15,000.
Grahek - also commented on the defibrilators and the positive outcome from having
such equipment in the squads.
Lund - commented on a ride-along with officer Jensen and Langner
Mahr - commented that she had been approached by a resident interested in becoming
a reserve officer and did not know that was an opportunity in CLPD. The Chief
welcomed a call from the individual to discuss the opportunities available.
.--
..:),
9. Consent Agenda
The following items were on the Consent Agenda:
A. Approval of the Commission Minutes of September 12, 2002
B. Monthly Financial Report for September 2002
C. Ratification of the September 2002 claims
Motion:
Commissioner Korst made a motion to approve the consent agenda seconded by
Commissioner Lund. The motion was unanimouslv approved.
Consent Aaenda Minutes fOllowup from Auaust Commission Meetina:
Commissioner Heifort explained that changing the wording for item A to reflect the
following change: "Chair Varian will finalize the list of questions sent to adjacent law
enforcement agencies." It should be noted that this in fact was accomplished, and this
correction allowed the August Commission Minutes to be voted on for approval.
Motion:
Commissioner Heifort made a motion to approve the August 2002 Commission Minutes
with the correction of Item A. seconded by Commissioner Mahr. The motion was
approved with the abstention of Commissioner Pitchford.
10. Action Items:
A. Anoka County Joint Powers Agreement for Public Safety Communications
Project
Motion:
Commissioner xxxx? Made a motion to approve the Joint Powers Agreement for Public
Safety Communications as presented by the County District Attorney seconded by
Commissioner vyvvv. The motion was unanimouslv approved.
B. Approval of Rules and Regulations Manual Chapter 86 on the Minnesota Data
Practices Act.
No action was taken. The Centerville City Attorney is still reviewing the docUment and
it will be an item of discussion at the November meeting.
C. Schooi of Police Staff and Command - May through August 2002
A lengthy discussion was held with some members stating this was in the authority of
the Chief and did not need to come before the Commission. Other members were
concerned that street coverage could not be maintained because of the duration of the
course. Northwestern University will present the course at the Arden Hills, Minnesota
State Police Training Facility. The course is about police management. The Chief
explained that all requests for training are examined and the hours of training per officer
exceeds accepted standards by Minnesota police agencies. Althouah no vote was
taken. it was the consensus of the Commission that trainina assianments are the
Chiefs decision. but the Commission is interested that trainina is appropriate
and eauitable. with reaard for coveraae aiven the budaet of the Department.
6.
D. Response from Cities for a New Police Facility
The discussion was wide-ranging and lengthy. Commissioner Korst asked where each
City was in regards to a new police facility. Commissioner Swedberg stated that
Centerville was not in support of a new facility and could not commit to a 20-year
obligation given the financial. state of the City of Centerville.
Commissioner Heifort raised the higher cost of police services for Lexington residents
and stated most of the budget now goes for police.
Several comments were expressed about the uncertainty of state support for local
government aide with tre state facing a $3 billion shortfall in the next biennium. The
state is seriously looking at elimination of municipal aids including fire and police aids.
The discussion focused on no action or building a new facility in Circle Pines. The
discussion did not adequately address the myriad alternatives that exist between these
two points.
Commissioner Grahek remarked that the discussion related to jail holding cells is
premature because the Department is just now collecting that data.
Questions were raised as what exactly is needed and in what priority - holding cells,
evidence lockers, garage space, clerical support space, meeting or training rooms,
computer rooms, interrogation rooms, booking, fingerprinting, photographic, and breath
testing areas and many more.
!t appears that the Commission does not have authority to bond as noted by a letter to
the Commission from the Administra.tors of Circle Pine, Lexington and Centerville.
The Chief remarked that the issue has been previously studied and this is a high priority
in his view.
No decision or action was taken.
E. Letter of Resignation from Commissione Secretary Bobbi Ward
Motion:
Commissioner Grahek made a motion to immediately accept the resignation and the
motion was seconded by Commissioner Korst. The motion was unanimouslv
approved.
Interim Action Taken:
In the interim, Tim Swedberg will take the minutes and the Chief will ask Timesavers
about a contract to take the minutes in the future.
'7
11. Miscellaneous Items
A. Update on Task Force to Review Commission Make-up
The Chief remarked that the task force had met and there was no further, discussion
pending the return of the Commission Chair.
B. Monthly Activity Report - No discussion
C. Monthly Department Summaries for September 2002 - No discussion
D. Towing Bid Letter - The Chief sent out a letter dated October 3 requesting bids for
towing services in 2003.
E. Minnesota Chief's Magazine Consolidation Articles - The Commission appreciated
the writeups and inclusion in the Commissioners monthly packets. The stories were
well written and highlighted communities consolidating police services in South Lake
Minnetonka, Minnetrista, and our department.
Executive Session
At 10:18 PM Vice-chair Pitchford moved the Commission to Executive Session to
discuss the pending union contract negotiations.
At 10:32 PM the Commission ended the Executive Session and opened the
regular Commission meeting.
Action Taken:
It was the consensus of the Commission that additional information and
questions concerning negotiation and strategy of the pending union contract can
be answered by Cy Smith, Chief Negotiator for the Department. It was agreed to
schedule an executive session at 7 PM October 29, 2002 at the Centerville City
Hall Council chambers.
Motion to Adjourn:
Commissioner Heifort made a motion to adjourn seconded by Commissioner Lund.
The motion was approved unanimous Iv.
Time of adiournment was 10:32 PM CST.
I trust these minutes are an accurate record of the Cenntennial Lakes Police
Commission meeting of October 10, 2002.
Sincerely,
7MS~
Centerville
t
CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT
BALANCE SHEET
OCTOBER 31, 2002
POLICE GENERAL FUND
ASSETS
901-10100 CASH-US BANK
901-10110 CASH-4-M FUND
901-10115 INVESTMENTS4-M
901-10120 CASH-EXPLORERS POST
901-10160 CASH-TRIAD FUNDS
901-10200 PETIY CASH
172,428.01
1,250.39
100,000.00
1,445.62
24.18
50.00
TOTAL ASSETS
275,198.20
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
LIABILITIES
901-21600 SALARIES-PAYABLE
901-21650 BENEFITS PAYABLE
6,574.00
12,323.00
TOTAL LIABILITIES
18,897.00
FUND EQUITY
901-24000 DESIGNATED FUND BAL-BENEFITS
901-25320 UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE
REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD
140,000.00
52,918.99
63,382.21
TOTAL FUND EQUITY
256,301.20
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
275.198.20
q.
CENTENNIAL LAKES POliCE DEPT
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 10 MONTHS ENDING OCTOBER 31, 2002
POLICE GENERAL FUND
PERIOD BUDGET %OF
ACTUAL YTO ACTUAL AMOUNT V ARlANCE BUDGET
CONTRACT REVENUES
901-31 :121 0-000 CIRCLE PINES CONTRACT 47,717.91 4n,179.10 572,615.00 95,435.90 ) 83.33
901-31-1220-000 LEXINGTON CONTRACT 36.496.95 364,969.50 437,963.00 72,993.50 ) 83.33
901-31-1230-000 CENTERVILLE CONTRACT 35,510.56 355,105.60 426,127.00 71,021.40 ) 83.33
901-31-1240-000 TRI-CITY START UP .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
TOTAL CONTRACT REVENUES 119,725.42 1,197,254.20 1,436,705.00 239,450.80 ) 83.33
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AIDS
901~33-3105-O00 GRANTS-FEDERAL COPS FAST .00 28,125.00 37,500.00 9,375.00 ) 75.00
901-33-3110-000 GRANTS~NEW COPS (SMALL COMM) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
901-33-3115-000 GRANTS,COPS MORE (EQUIPMENT) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
901-33-3120-000 GRANTS-STATE SNOWMOBILE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
901-33-3125-000 ANOKA COUNTY GRANTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
901-33-3130-000 STATE TRAINING REIMBURSEMENT .00 6,363.37 5,500.00 863.37 115.70
901.33~3133-000 STATE GRANTSIREIMBURSEMENTS .00 1,616.73 .00 1,616.73 .00
901-33-3135-000 COPS FAST GRANT (PRIOR) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
901-33-3140-000 SMALL COMMUNITIES GRANT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
901-33-3170-000 DARE FUNDS- CENTENNIAL SC/PTA .00 3,500.00 .00 3,500.00 .0
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL AIDS .00 39,605.10 43,000.00 3,394.90 ) 92.10
PUBLIC CHARGES FOR SERVICE
901-34-4110-000 COPIES/REPORT RECORDS/NOTARY .00 904.30 2,000.00 1,095.70 ) 45.21
TOTAL PUBLIC CHARGES FOR SERVICE .00 904.30 2,000.00 1,095.70 ) 45.21
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
901-36-6210-000 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 301.48 1,646.02 1,250.00 396.02 131.68
901-36-6230-000 COMMISSION SALARY RE1MB 400.00 2,800.00 7.200.00 4,400.00 ) 38.89
901-36-6233-000 SPECIAL EVENT REIMB 774.89 7,592.47 5,000.00 2,592.47 151.85
901-36.6235-000 MISCELLANEOUS 89.85 906.66 7,500.00 6.593.34 ) 12.09
901-36-6238-000 CLOSE EXPLORERS ACCOUNT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
901-36-6240-000 VEHICLE & EQUIPMENT SALES 9,300.00 13,281.64 15,000.00 1,718.36 ) 88.54
901-36-6245-000 FORFEITURES 650.05 2,934.34 5,000.00 2.065.66 ) 58.69
901-36-6250-000 DONATIONS .00 4,000.00 5,000.00 1,000.00 ) 80.00
901-36-6255-000 DONATION-LIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
901-36-6260-000 DONATJONS-CRIME PREVENTION .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES 11,516.27 33,161.13 45,950.00 12,788.87 ) 72.17
TOTAL FUND REVENUE 131,241.69 1,270,924.73 1,527,655.00 ( 256,730.27 ) 83.1'"'
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY
83 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED
11/08/2002 1 0:54AM
PAGE: 1
/0,
CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT
EXPENSES COMPARED TO BUDGET BY EXPENSE CODES
FOR THE 10 MONTHS ENDING OCTOBER 31,2002
POLICE DEPARTMENT
MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET V ARJANCE % OF BUDGET
POLICE OPERATIONS
901-42-2100-101 POLleE-SALARIES-FULL- TIME 71,921.18 759,55725 949,067.00 189,509.75 80.03
901-42-2100-102 POLICE-SALARIES OVERTIME 877.52 24,720.73 40,000.00 15,279.27 61.80
901-42-2100-103 POLlCE-SALARIES-P ART -TIME 2,138.08 23,596.31 34,000.00 10,403.69 69.40
901-42-2100-106 POLICE-COMMISSION SALARIES .00 3,600.00 7,200.00 3,600.00 50.00
901-42.2100-121 POLlCE.PERA 6,555.82 70,857.34 90,584.00 19,726.66 78.22
901.42-2100-122 POlleE-FICA 600.97 6,032.95 7,502.00 1,469.05 80.42
901-42-2100-123 POLICE-MEDICARE 843.80 9,155.39 12,946.00 3,790.61 70.72
901-42-2100-130 POLICE-HEAL TH/LIFEJDISAB/DENT A 8,819.42 87,811.40 93,568.00 5,756.60 93.85
901-42-2100.131 SELECT ACCOUNT FEES 28.00 724.00 1,200.00 476.00 60.33
901-42-2100-140 POLlCE-RE-EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE .00 2,428.21 .00 2,428.21 ) .00
901-42-2100-150 POLICE-WORKERS COMP INSURANCE .00 19,626.00 20,000.00 374.00 98.13
PERSONNEL 91,784.79 1,008,109.58 1,256,067.00 247,957.42 80.26
901-42-2100-201 POLICE-OFFICE SUPPLIES 490.74 3,580.73 5,000.00 1,419.27 71.61
901-42-2100-202 POLlCE.CLEANING SUPPLIES 20.82 175.51 500.00 324.49 35.10
901-42-2100-203 POLICE-PRINTED FORMS 38.50 709.59 2,000.00 1,290.41 35.48
901-42-2100-211 POUCE-INTOXIL YZER SUPPLIES .00 260.96 600.00 339.04 43.49
901-42-2100-212 POLICE-FUEL 1,581.80 14,366.18 24,000.00 9,633.82 59.86
901-42-2100-213 POLICE-OIL & LUBRICANTS .00 72.80 200.00 127.20 36.40
901-42-2100-214 POLICE-AT\! & SNOWMOBILE SUPPLY .00 52.35 300.00 247.65 17.45
901-42-2100-215 POLICE-AMMO & FIREARM SUPPLIES 16.04 2,389.02 3,000.00 610.98 79.63
901-42-2100-216 POUCE.MEDICAUFIRE SUPPLJES .00 165.19 1,SOO.00 1,334.81 11.01
901-42-2100-217 POLlGE-INVESTIGATION SUPPLIES 4.46 322.80 1,200.00 877.20 26.90
901-42.2100-218 POLICE-UNIFORMS 3,608.15 11,885.05 15,000.00 3,114.95 79.23
901-42-2100-219 POLlCE-CRIME PREVENTION SUPPLY .00 431.62 1,000.00 568.38 43.16
SUPPLIES 5,760.51 34,411;80 54,300.00 19,888.20 63.37
901-42-2100-301 POLlCE-AUDIT/ACCTfNG SERVICES 515.00 7,466.00 12,000.00 4,534.00 62.22
901-42-21CO"304 POLlCE-LEGAL FEES .00 20.00 5,000.00 4,980.00 .40
901-42-2100-306 POLlCE-PERSONNEL TESTING 420,00 2,353.07 2,500.00 146.93 94.12
901-42-2100-309 POLlCE-LABOR RELATIONS .00 .00 1,500.00 1.500.00 .00
901-42-2100-312 POLlGE-CONTRACT TYPING .00 560.00 960.00 400.00 58.33
901-42-2100-321 POLlCE-TELEPHONE 571.82 5,564.37 7,000.00 1,435.63 79.49
901-42-2100-322 POLlCE-POST AGE .00 1,039.61 1,SOO.OO 460.39 69.31
901-42.2100-331 POLlCE-TRA VEl/TRAIN1NG 643.00 8,820.19 16,000.00 7,179.81 55.13
901-42.2100-351 POLICE-PRINTING & PUBLISHING .00 436.20 300.00 136.20 } 145.40
901-42-2100-361 POLlCE-PROPERTY/LlABIUTY lNS .00 23,879.00 28,000.00 4,121.00 85.28
901-42-2100-380 POLICE-UTILITIES 101.80 1,410.00 3,500.00 2,090.00 40.29
901-42-21 00-385 POLlCE-CJRS ACCESS 390.00 1,170.00 1,800.00 630.00 65.00
901-42-2100-386 POLICE-MDT ACCESS .00 3,225.41 4,500.00 1,274.59 71.68
CONTRACTED SERVICES 2,641.62 55,943.85 84,560.00 28,616.15 66.16
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY
83 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED
11/08/2002 1 0:54AM
PAGE: 1
II.
CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT
EXPENSES COMPARED TO BUDGET BY EXPENSE CODES
FOR THE 10 MONTHS ENDING OCTOBER 31, 2002
POLICE DEPARTMENT
MTD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET V AR1ANCE % OF BUDGET
901 -42-21 00-401 POlleE-BUILDING/GROUNDS MTC 50.00 1,465.97 2,200.00 734.03 66.63
901-42~21 00-402 POLICE-OFFICE/SOFTWARE MTC 991.93 2,853.54 5,000.00 2,146.46 57.07
901-42-2100-403 POLICE-OFFICE EQUIP MTC CONT .00 4,688.27 5,000.00 311.73 93.77
901-42-2100-404 POLICE-VEHICLE REPAIR & MTC 441.94 7,856.22 14,000.00 6,143.78 56.12
901-42-2100-405 POLICE-EQUIP REPAIR & MTC 141.86 440.14 1,500.00 1,059.86 29.34
901-42-2100-412 POLJCE46UILDING LEASE 924.00 9,240.00 12,000.00 2,760.00 77.00
901-42-2100-415 POLICE-VEHICLE LEASE .DO 49,931.38 51,000.00 1,068.62 97.90
901-42-2100-417 POLICE-EQUIP LEASE Ale RECORDS 37.00 732.28 22,000.00 21,267.72 3.33
901-42-2100-433 POLICE-DUES .00 565.00 790.00 225.00 71.52
901-42-2100-435 POLICE-SUBSCRIPTIONS & BOOKS .00 175.00 500.00 325.00 35.00
901-42-2100-440 POLICE-BANK SERVICE FEES 61.10 470.23 500.00 29.77 94.05
901-42-2100-495 MISCELLANEOUS 60.00 379.73 1,000.00 620.27 37.97
901-42-2100-498 DARE EXPENSES .00 3,034.12 .00 3,034.12 ) .00
MAINTENANCE 2,707.83 81,831.88 115,490.00 33,658.12 70.B6
901-42-2100-550 POLlCE-VEHICLE SETUP & TRIM .00 11,414.19 10,000.00 1,414.19 ) 114.14
901-42-2100-570 EQUIPMENT 488.68 15,831.22 22,200.00 6,368.78 71.31
CAPTT At OUTLAY 488.68 27,245.41 32,200.00 4,954.59 84.61
901-42-2"\00-900 CONT1NGENCY FUNDS .00 .00 1,800.00 1,800.00 .00
CONTINGENCY .00 .00 1,800.00 1,800.00 .00
TOTAL POLICE OPERATIONS 103,383.43 1,207,542.52 1,544,417.00 336,874.48 78.19
TOTAL POLlCE GENERAL FUND 103,383.43 1,207,542.52 1,544,417.00 336,874.48 78.19
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY
83 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED
11/08/2002 10:54AM PAGE: 2
/2,
CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT
Check Register -POLICE
GL Posting Period(s): 10/02 - 10/02
Check Issue Dale(s): 10/11/2002-10/31/2002
Page: 1
Oct 31 ,2002 02:07pm
Per Date Check No
10/02 10/28/2002 4158
10/02 10/31/2002 4159
10/02 10/15/2002 4160
10/02 10/15/2002 4161
10/02 10/15/2002 4162
10/02 10/17/2002 4163
10102 10131/2002 4164
Totals:
Vendor No
230200
160200
10'794
190770
40345
30775
30775
Payee
VOID - SOSSI WARD
PERFORMANCE AUTO, INC
ANOKA COUNTY ATTORNEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA TREASURY
DEPUTY REGISTRAR #150
CIRCLE PINES PAYROLL ACCOUNl
CIRCLE PINES PAYROLL ACCOUNl
Amount
80.00 -M
174.45 M
58.30 M
29.15 M
12.50 M
41,595.81 M
41,738.00 M
83,528.21
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
/3.
~ E
a.
"-
cvs:!
O>N
",0
o..N
0
0 N NN N N N
"! 0 0 00 0 0 0
0 00 0 0 0
;;; 0.. ~ NN !:::! !:::! N
-- "'
U '" '" "-~ '" ~
ro ~ ~'" ;,::: s:? ~
0 2> -- 25
0 00 0 0
~ ~~ ~ ~
" 0 0 ~O ~ 0 0 '" '" '" '" 0
'<ij '" '" <00 <0 '" '" ... ... ~ ~ '"
"- ro ro u?cO M N N '" '" oj oi
"E '" '" "'''' '" ~ "- "- N N
" ~f'-._ "'- ~
0 ~~ '"
E <0
<(
E 0 0 ~o ~ 0 0 "' '" "' '" 0 0 0
'" '" <00 ro "' "' ... ... ~ 'C 00 0
<( <Xi ro LOcO '" N N '" ... oi '" o' 0
" "' "' "'''' '" ~ "- I'- N N ro <0
~ lO_ 1'--_ "'-
" ~~ '"
...... ro
Z
N NN N N N N
'" 0 00 0 O. 0 0
ro 0 00 0 0 0 0
!:::! ~~ N !:::! !:::! N
D "' I'-~ "' ~ '" 05
" ~ ~'" ;,::: s:? ;,::: 2l
~ - --
Z 0 00 0 0 0
0 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
Ui 0 0
(fl N
~ 0 <( <(
0 ;:: ;::
::;:!:::! z z (f)
O~ 0 0 CJ 0
os:? 0.. 0.. I <(
w;:O "' -' '" 0 ;::
0, '" -' '" -' Z
:IN e w 0 W 0 0
00 .Q (f) n: (fl "-
0..0 a. Z >- Z I '"
t~ "5 w <( w w '"
0.. "- 0.. <: 0..
o~ '" X NN X ... X
0.0 '" 0<
0 w w "- w
"'~ -~
::;-:.. w ro _ W (fl w
a: ~~ a: 0 a:
ro '" O'~
>- ::J ::J <( ::J
o '" I- ~-' I- 0.. t:: (f)
o..m w w-' W w w W
0.0 00 I-
<(- lL _a: L.L ~ L.L :::>
" n: -'>- n: <( n: z
-a. 0 0<( 0 n: 0
e c lL 0.."- L.L al L.L ~
"'-
E
'" 0 N NN N N N <0
ro 0 00 0 0 0
"- z '" I'-~ '" ~ '"
" 0 ~'" 0 '" ~
u. 00 0 0
'0 ~ ~~ ~
>
~
I- >-
Z n:
::J ::J
0 (fl
>- 0 <(
0 0 w
w <( 0 n:
" z -' "' ~ l-
E n: -' ~ f'"
I- ro 0 0 .. 0 ~o ~
Z ~ a: I- NO N
"- a: 0 roo
w 1; ~ <( ::J (f) <0
0 a: <( 0<0 N
" I- w <0_ "'
W e ~ 0.. W z M
(f) '"
0 '" Z (f) C3 0 Z <0 <0
:J > w z ~ 0
::J ~ w <( a:
0 0 a: :;: L.L <(
0.. 0 "- ~ n: 0 S
(f) :;; W 0 W
W -' m
:,:: 0 ::J L.L 0 I- 0 0
0 ... '" 0.. '" a: 0 f'" I'- CO 0
:s z '" n: I'- W ... W N I'- 0 N
<( I'- U I'- 0 '" 0.. 0 (f) 0 CO 0
-' 0 0 0 CD '" '"
~ ~ '" ... N -0
... <Ii "' <Ii "' <Ii 0 <Ii 0 <Ii 0 <Ii 'iii <Ii
Z 1; '" I'- ... 0 "- 0 -cia.. 15
Z "- 15 I'- 15 '" 15 N 15 "- 15 N "0 offi c
w " 0 I- 0 f- 0 f- 0 f- 0 I- 0 f- f-
l- e ~ '" ... CD '" '" o..::J "
" N ~~ C
Z > "'
W 00 c'5 ! Y
0 1-1-
-
'.',
CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT Check Register -POLICE Page: 1
GL Posting Period(s): 11/02 - 11/02 Nov 12,2002 12:32pm
Check Issue Date(s): 11/01/2002 - 11/14/2002
Per Date Check No Vendor No Payee Amount
11/02 11/14/2002 4165 10750 ANOKA COUNTY 932.00
j1/02 11/14/2002 4166 11653 AUTO-MEDICS INC 211.28
11/02 11/14/2002 4167 20175 BILLS RENTAL CENTER, INC 7.93
11/02 11/14/2002 4168 20350 RUSSELL A BLANCK 125.00
11/02 11/14/2002 4169 30060 CP OFFICE PRODUCTS 16.40
11/02 11/14/2002 4170 30480 CENTENNIAL UTILITIES 15.18
11/02 11/14/2002 4171 40300 DELTA DENTAL 692.40
11/02 11/14/2002 4172 40345 DEPUTY REGISTRAR #150 25.00
11/02 11/14/2002 4173 50150 EMERGENCY AUTO TECH ,INC 127.26
11/02 11/14/2002 4174 60650 FRATTALLONES HARDWARE, INC. 12.66
11/02 11/14/2002 4175 80329 JOEL HECKMAN 44.99
11/02 11/14/2002 4176 90026 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, IN 67.63
11/02 11/14/2002 4177 120350 CINDY LEWIS 17.18
11/02 11/14/2002 4178 130204 ROBERT A MAKELA 59.00
11/02 11/14/2002 4179 130348 MCLEOD USA 236.90
11/02 11/14/2002 4180 130500 MIDWAY FORD 52.26
11/02 11/14/2002 4181 130708 MINNCOMM PAGING 43.96
11/02 11/14/2002 4182 130790 MN COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSOC. 24.50
11/02 11/14/2002 4183 130798 MN DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION 37.00
11/02 11/14/2002 4184 131200 MINNESOTA UC FUND 4,162.65
11/02 11/14/2002 4185 131280 MUL TICARE ASSOCIATES, INC 57.00
11/02 11/14/2002 4186 160140 PEl P 10,241.20
11/02 11/14/2002 4187 160200 PERFORMANCE AUTO, INC 84.13
11102 11/1412002 4188 170180 QWEST 172.03
1/02 11/14/2002 4189 180150 RED ROOSTER AUTO STORES 10.10
1/02 11/14/2002 4190 190257 SELECT ACCOUNT 56.00
11/02 11/1412002 4191 190910 STREICHER'S 62.09
11/02 11/14/2002 4192 200050 TWIN CITIES EMEDIA, INC 37.50
11/02 11/14/2002 4193 200075 TEXACO/SHELL 1,969.62
11/02 11/14/2002 4194 200100 TIRES PLUS 592.64
11/02 11/14/2002 4195 210110 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, INC 594.70
11/02 11/14/2002 4196 210235 UNITED WISCONSIN GROUP 129.73
11/02 11/14/2002 4197 220200 VERIZON WIRELESS 243.13
Totals: 21,161.05
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
/5/
~ E
a.
0
..",
" ..
mN
"'~
o..N
0
0 NN NN N N N N N N N NN
"!. 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
N 0.. NN ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~ NN
> " ;;r~ vv V V V ~ ~ ~;;;r
0 m ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ >:: ~ ~ ~ ~~
-- -- - - - - - - --
Z 0 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ -r; ~ ~ ~ ~~
"0 00 0 0'" to '" '" 0 0 0 0 '" '" 0 0 0 0 'D CD ,,"0>
'iij 00 0 v'" "!. 0> 0> 0 0 V V ~ ~ V V 0 0 N N ~v
0.. aN N """:0> ~ ,..: ,..: .,; '" cD cD .,; .,; N N '" .,; ,..: ,..: tOeD
C vo> '" "'''" ~ N N ~ ~ ~ 0> 0> N N N N
=> "'''' 0> N ~ ~ CD CD ~ ~
0
E
<{
E 00 0 O.CO cO '" '" 0 0 0 0 to '" 0 0 0 0 CD CD ""0>
00 0 v'" "!. 0> 0> 0 0 v v ~ v ": 0 ~ N N ~v
<{ ON N ""':oi ~ ,..: ,..: .,; .,; cD cD '" .,; N N .,; "' ,..: ,..: <ci<D
> vo> '" "'''" ~ N N ~ ~ 0> 0> N N N N
E "'''' 0> ~ N ~ 'D CD ~ ~
'"
Z
NN NN N N N N N N N N
" 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cii 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~~ f::!t::! N N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0 vv vv ~ ~ ~ V v v v
> ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ >:: >:: ~ >::.
E -- -- - - - - -
Z ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Q ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Ul Ul 0
UlN
-0 0:: f-
::;0 0:: w ::;
::;~ w :r: 0::
ov N (/) 0
0>:: <{ <{ !;:
w;:: -' -'
W l.L
0, w O::U)
:IN C Ul Ul N 0 w>::
00 ,Q Ul >- fO 0 Zz
0..0 li w Z w 0" ~ w<{
,~ "5 0 0 '" ~ (')f-
t~ Ul Ul
00 '" 0 ~ Z W 0> >= zz
0.- " <{ 0 :J U) 9' -' ow
w~ 0 f- (') ~ W ::J -(')
o:::~ 0.. -' w :2: !;:>-
ro'U) of- >= 0.. >= <{ ~ f-X
:2:0.. Ul ::J :J f- :5 '"
>~ Ul UlO
o " o::W w(') w Ul >= Z f- 0 w>-
Ciro >:r: w f-
f-Ul ~o ::J U) W ::J W ::J-,
0.0 00 Ul W 0 f- 0 LL ::; (/)0..
<(- 00.. :r:W >< 0 u: 0.. 0 0:: :r: X 0..
- =>
c a. 0::0 wff w :r: LL W W 0 W w::J
w c ",0 >f- -' Ul 0 Ul 0 LL > -,U)
E-
>- 0 0>0> NCD "' N N N N N ~ N
ro N'" o~ v 0 ;;; 0 0 0 V 0
0.. Z 'r'--r-- v"" ~ v v v v N V
" NN ~O> v ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ '"
" 00 ~'" "' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'0 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> NN
E
<5
0 ~
0 ~ w-
0::
~ 0 :r: ~
" "'
E 0:: Ul Ul .. 0
w 0
f- '" w f- ill f- 0::
0.. Z f- >:: 0 >= 0::
w 0; 0 Z 0 ::J :J <( 0 <(
0 w 0 0:: f- :r:
"0 Z Z >= f- ::J
c >- 0 :'5 0 U)
ill f- ::J -' Ul <(
0 " Ul -' 0:: ~ a w
:J > Z 0 <( W 0.. -' >- Z
::J is f- <( :=; Z w 0 0
0 0 Z w 0:: Z -'
Z W
0.. 0 W ill -' 0 0 w -'
U) :;; 0:: -' u: Z >- (') <(
~ W ill ~ f- f:
w 0 Ul Ul LL f- ::J 0::
>:: 0 0 fo- '" -' "' U) 0 0 0 Z 0 0 0.. "' W 0 <(
:'5 Z '" :::> "' -' "" ::J "' 0.. CD ill '" ill 0 ill v ::; '" 0::
<{ "" <( 'D W ~ 0:: '" 0 0 0 v 0 '" 0 '" w ~ LL
-' 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
:=; ~ ~ N N '" '" v V "'
0 (ii '" (ii "' (ii 0 (ii 0 (ii 0 (ii 0 (ii "' (ii 0 (ii 0
Z "' "' "" "' CD '" 0 v "' "'
Z 0; "" 0 CD ~ ~ 0 '" 0 0 0 v 0 '" 0 '" 0 ~ 0 CD
W "0 0 f- ~ 0 f- a f- a f- a f- a f- ~ f- a f- a
c ~ ~ N N '" '" v co CD
f- "
Z >
w
0 j
'" E
a.
0
..'"
(]) ..
O>N
"'~
(LN
0
0 N N N NNN N NN N N N
N. 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 0 0
N (L 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 0 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~t:!~ ~ ~~ ~ N ~
> (]) ". " """ "..,. " ~ ..,.
0 ro ~ ~ <: ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
- - ........... ..... - -- - - -
z 0 ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~. ~ ~
"0 '" 0 0 0 0 '" '" "0'" '" 0 0 00 0 '" '" 0 0 N
.iij CO 0 0 "! N ~ ~ """,,,, 0 ~ 00 0 0 0 '" '" CO
(L N ,..: ,..: ~ ~ .,,: .,,: roLri~ N ci 0 0000 <0 N N t- ,...: m
1:: CO '" '" ..,. ..,. co co "''''"' "" ~ NN "' CO CO '" '" CO
~ N. N ~ "'.
" ". ci
0 0 ~
E ~ ~
<{
E "' 0 0 0 0 '" '" ""0'" '" 0 0 00 0 '" '" 0 0 N
CO 0 0 "! "! ~ ~ 1'-"'0> 0 ~ ~ 00 0 0 q "' ~ CO
<( N ,..: ,..: ~ ;:t '" " o::iuir....: N ci ci cOo:) <0 N N ,...: I'- m
> CO '" '" " CO CO "'"'''' I'- ~ NN "' CO CO '" '" CO
E ~ N. N. ~ "'.
Q) '" 0 0
~ ~
Z
N N N N N NN N N N
(]) 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0
ro 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0
N ~ ~ ~ N ~t:! N ~ N
0 " ..,. " ~ ..,.". " ~
> ~ ~ <: ~ ~~ ~ ~ <:
E - - - -- - -
z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
Uj
U)N
-0
:;:0
:;:~ I I
0"" (L (L
0<: zU)Z
w;: <{
(j) owo
0, ~ -z- (j)(j) '<:
::iN C ~o~ WW 0::
00 .S! <{ Ww
(LO E. X f-If- LLLL 0
,N "5 W (J)(L(J) I-f- 3:
t;::: I- "'z'" 00 0::
00 '" (J) =>0::>
0.- (]) Z ~ (J)_(j) I 00 W
(])~ 0 U1 wl-w (j) <{<( (j) f-
a::::: :2 I -l;::-l Z I-f- W ::>
'roU} w I- -' -' uo 0 (L
>~ 0 -' -U)- LL ww ~ :;: -'
o (]) <{ <( (J) >",> ::'l -'-' a. 0 w
0.15 -' W c.') 0:: 0:: WW I ::>
0.0 (L :r: :r: w::Jw z U)(j) I- 0 LL
<{- W u f-(J)f- ~ >f- ::> 0
Ea 0 -' zxz 0 (J) f-
0:: W WwW 00 0
(]) c: (L 0 is o-'u ZO :;: :2 0
E
>- 0 N N N N '" N", N '" ~
'" 0 0 0 0 ~ 00 0 I'- ~
(L Z ..,. ..,. ..,. ". co ..,." ". 0 N
(]) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~N ~ 0 co
" ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~N ~ N '"
.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 CO
0 0
> N 0
E CO
'"
..- E
a.
o
(J)~
0>'"
"'~
"-N
o
o
N_
N
>
o
Z
z
o
i.i5
(J)N
~g
::;;~
0"-
O:!::
W~
o
::IN
00
q.~
t::~
00
0.-
Q)~
o:~
moo
Eim
a10
",-0
"'5
-a.
ms:
E
>,
'"
"-
o
"-
Q)
1ii
o
"C
""
"-
c:
::l
o
E
<C
E
<C
>
c:
Q)
Z
Q)
1ii
o
>
c:
c
o
E.
t;
'"
Q)
o
o
Z
Q)
"
"0
>
c
N
CD
0;
CD
"'-
N
CD
0;
CD
oe.
N
o
o
N
~
~
-
~
~
..-
CD
N
'"
CD
..-
CD
N
'"
CD
N
o
o
N
;:;
~
-
~
~
(J)
w
C)
z
<C
I
o
-'
o
()j
0:
;;:
"-
W
0:
I
W
>
N
o
..-
~
~
~
..-
CD
N
'"
CD
..-
CD
N
'"
CD
N
o
o
~
....
:!::
~
~
o
r-
-<i
'"
CD
o
r-
-<i
'"
CD
N
o
o
N
;:;
:!::
~
~
UJ
:;;
0:
o
Li-
z
::>
N
o
....
~
~
~
o
r-
-<i
'"
CD
o
r-
'"
'"
CD
N
o
o
N
;:;
~
-
~
~
'"
'"
'"
N
~
'"
r-
0;
N
~
'"
o
o
N
~
-
~
~
(f)
Z
l!l
<C
~
o
i:iJ
Li-
::J
o
w
o
N
o
....
~
~
~
'"
r-
0;
N
~
'"
r-
cri
N
~
N
o
o
N
~
~
-
~
~
'"
~
<'i
....
N
'"
~
<'i
....
N
'"
~
<'i
....
N
'"
~
'"
....
N
N
o
o
N
;:;
:!::
~
w
C)
<C
(J)
::>
w
z
o
I
"-
-'
-'
w
o
N
o
....
~
~
~
NOV. -11' 02 (MON) )):48
BARNA GUZY STEFFE
TEL:612 780 1777
P. 002
BERNARl JR.. STEFFEN
H1CI-[ARD A. MERRILL
DARRELI- A.]ENSlJN
JEFFREY,. JOHNSON
RU~::;EI,I.I-\. CR(1WI)F-R
ION r. ERICKSON
TI-lOMA~ r~ M......lONB
lvllCI'lA~L F. l-lURL.UY
rX-"UOL^:; U. SAUTER
HERMAN!.. TALL!::
CHARLES M. srlYKnRA
nANIEL D. GANTER.JH.,
nBvl~rtLY K. DODGE
JAME..S D. lJOEFT
JOAN M. QUADE
BGS
SCOTT M. Um....K
RTEVEN G. THORSON
ELl'tAREll-[ A. SCHADlNO
\XI1LUAM It Hl)EFNER
BRADLEY A. KLETSCHr_R
KR1STl R. RILtii
CHERYL A, JORGENSEN
WILLIAM n. SIEClJl.-
TOOD J. ANLAUF
JRNNlFER C. T. SMITI [
KARIN G. ~IMON~ON
MAITHEW ^' K:Qfl.OOJ
Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd.
ATI'ORNEYS AT LAW
400 Nor[hrown Financial Plaza
200 Coon Rapids Boulevard
Minneapolis, MN 55433-5894
(763) 780-8500 FAX (763) 780-1777
1-800-422-3486
VJWw.h!;"~law.c.:o1l1
O/C"ulUd
Rl'lBETlT A."GUZ'l'
MRMORAND\JI\I[
TO:
Chief Joel ffeckman, Centenntlal Lakes police Dept.
FROM:
Jim Hoeft, Centerville City Attorney
RE:
Data Practices Plan
DATED:
November 11, 2002
Thank you for the opportunity tD review the Data Practices Plan tD determine jts compliance with
current statures, both state aDd federal. After reviewing the same T find that it is in compliance
with existing statutes, and is comprehensive in nature. Because there are specific references to
statutory subdivisions and obligations thereunder, I wDllld suggest that this Plan be reviewed on
an annual basis to make sure that the statutory references are current.
Thank you again for the opportunity to be of assistance.
An EljU;J( OPP'1rrl\niry E.1ii~~loy.::r
clo.
'.
j Chief of Police Joel D. Heckman
. Centennial Lakes Police Department
200 Civic Heights Circle .
Circle Pines MN 55014
763-784-2501 iheckmanalicentenniallakesvd. com
To: Centennial Lakes Joint Police Commission
Re: Commission Secretary
At the request of the Commission, I contacted Time Savers Secretarial Services and spoke
with a Carla Wirth. (1-888-421-4110 or 763-421-8999)
Per Ms. Wirth, Time Savers rate is $22.50 hr, with time beginning 15 minutes prior to the
meeting and ending 15 minutes after the meeting for drive time. Additionally, $10.75 is
charged per page for minutes.
A second way of calculating their rates is by their base rate of $103.00 for the first hour
and $25.50 for each one-half hour after that.
However, when usinl!: either of the above methods, the IDGHER RATE PREY Afi,S.
For example: Our meeting starts at 7 PM ends at 10 PM and there are 4 pages of notes.
$22.50 x 3.5hrs = $78.75
$10.75 x 4pages= $43.00
$121.75
$103.00 xl = $103.00
$ 25.50 x 5 = $127.50
$230.00
Total monthly cost to Commission = $230.00 + unless meeting time is reduced.
(One hour less meeting time would equal $179.50 monthly cost)
Per Ms. Wirth, Time Savers does not have anyone at present to fill our need (the person
that takes Centerville City Council minutes is already booked at another job on
Commission meeting nights) and they are shorthanded at present attempting to fill current
contracts.
Therefore, if the Commission desires to use their services they would need sufficient
notice to secure staff and would probably not have someone available until 2003.
2/,
BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC.
2535 ~ Avenue North East
Blaine, MN 55449
Phone: (763) 786-9020
Oct. 22, 2002
This letter is a proposal to provide towing and storage service to the
centennial LaKes Police D~partment for calendar years 2003 and 2004.
Our company has been providing similar service to the Lino Lake~, Blaine,
and Spring Lake Park Police Departments for over twenty-five years. We
have an excellent reputation with these departments. Following is a list
of proposals for this agreement;
1. All pOlice ordered impound tows within the cities of Lexington or Circle
pines would be $65.00. Tows for Centerville would be $70.00. These prices
would be for the 2003 period, and there would be an increase of up to
5.00 for the 2004 period. Mileage for out of city calls would only be
charged if additional distance is required to be driven to return to our bas
This mileage would be charged at $3.00 per mile. Accident tows are an
additional $35.00, including any cleanup service, for the duration of the
agreement.
2. Winching, also called recovery 'service, is at $75.00 for one truck and on,
man unless extra difficulty is experienced. Recovery work can be very
difficult to price beforehand because of the variance of the nature of
each joe. Our history in this field has shown that we have been very
reasonable for this service in our indusrty.
3. Flatbed service is an additional $35.00 from the base rate.
4. Dolly wheel service is an extra $45.00 from the base rate.
5. Police cars are not charged for towing or recovery service for a
Professional 24 Hour Towing Service
call. Cars needed to be towed to other cities for
repair service, etc. will be charged
$65.00 plus mileage.
d~,
BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC.
2535 85th Avenue North East
Blaine. MN 55449
Phone: (763) 786-9020
6 Cars to be stered for forfeiture shall be at d~ily storage fees, up to
a maximum of $350.00J;Ser vehicle, for the duration of time to clear the
vehicle for the city.
7. A fuel surcharge may'be charged when gas prices are at $1.50 per gallon c
higher. The charge shall be $4.00 per tow.
8. Storage fees are to be $20.00 per calendar date for outside storage
and $40.00 for inside for the duration of the contract agreement.
9.All vehicles towed and stored shall incur a $20.00 administrative fee.
10L Liability insurance shall be maintained at one million dollars as
requested .'
11. Police requested tows for vehicles one-ton rated shall be an additional
ten dollars over the base rate. Vehicles rquiring heavy duty equipment
will be at a rate of $45.00 over the base fee.
12. Motorcycles shall be charged the base fee plus a $25.00 trailer charge.
Our company has and will continue to provide prompt service to the
best of our ability. We strive to respond to police ordered calls as fast
as possible, almost always atriving on the scene within 150r 20 minutes
or less. If circumstances arise to delay us, we cannot agree to provide
our service ,at no charge, as the commission has so asked. If chosen to be
the provider for your service, we would provide a prompt, courteous service
to both the police officers and the customers. and we also expect the same
be shown to our employees. Thank you for your consideration, and I would
be happy to ans~er any questions tha~ may arise.
Sincerely,
0fft &-~
Gre:Z skey ~
owner
Professional 24 Hour Towing Service
c;{3,
AU-TO-MEDICS SERVICE
3760 Flowerfield Road. Blaine, MN 55014
763-784-7501
October 28, 2002
Centennial Lakes
Joint Police -Commission
200 Civic Heights Circle
Circle Pines,MN 55014
RE: TOWING BID 2003-2004
POLICE TOWING CONTRACT
To The Centennial Lakes Police Commission:
We wish to submit for your consideration the fOllowing bid
for the 2003-2004 Towing Contract. We have enjoyed working
with'the Chief and Staff in the past and appreciate the
opportunity to bid on the contract for the future.
We welcome any of you to come tour our new facility at 3760
Flowerfield Rd. in Blaine, to see how we are set up for the
towing and what security we have in place. We, are very proud
of oUr Cer-iOified Drivers, many who hold various certifications
in specialty areas such as Hazmat, Big Rigs, and Level I & II
Certifications for accident scenes. Our drivers are in uniform
and take great pride in our trucks by maintaining the fleet
so the trucks appear nice and clean for our customers.
Many of us live in the areas we serve and feel we are all part
of this community. We take pride in our response times and
attempt to serve the officers as quiCkly as possible to allow
them to deal with their jobs and difficult situations at hand.
Should you have any questions about our services and the bid,
we invite you to feel free to call or still better yet, stop
by at your convenience.
We look forward to ~erving your needs in the years to come.
We thank-you ~or your time and consideration!
//.~, Sincerely,
~~~~
Pam & Art Smith
Auto-Medics
Enclosures:
( 2)
,cJl!.
AUTO-MEDICS SERVICE
3760 Flowerfield Road' Blaine, MN 55014
763-784-7501
2003-2004 BID FOR POLICE TOWING
LEXINGTON & CIRCLE PINES
\
Response times for Police Ordered Tows for the City of Lexington
and Circle pines will be 20 minutes under normal circumstances.
The following Rates will apply:
Regular Tows
Dollies or Flatbed
Winching (Minimum)
Storage per Day
Storage Per, Day
Administration Fee
$60.00
$35.00 (Additional Fee)
$60.00
$20.00 (Outsi de)
$40.00 (Inside)
$15.00
The above rates are for Non-Commercial Vehicles under 3/4 Ton
with the keys available for the tows.
Should gas prices exceed $1.75 per gallon, a fuel charge may
be added of up to 5%.
Squad cars within the City Limits, will be towed free up to 4
calls per year. After the 4th tow, the price billed out will
be $35.00 plus tax within the city limits,
Police Forfeitures: Normal towing rates, adm. fee, and tax
shall apply. Storage of $250.00 per 3 months periods
will be initiated as many vehicles are sitting for extended
periods of time.
Office Hours shall be:
Monday-Friday-B:OO a.m.-5:00 p.m.
SatUrdays-IO:OO a.m.-12:00 Noon.
Sundays-3:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m.
Holidays are by appointment.
We feel these hours are best as most of the Police Offices
. and Insurance Agencies we deal with are available these hours.
We also feel DWI's and Drug Impounds are kept off the streets
and allowed to sober-up before vehioles are released.
(1 )
ois:
AUTO-MEDICS SERVICE
3760 Floweriield Road' Blaine, MN 55014
763-784-7501 .
2003-2004 BID FOR POLICE TOWING
FOR CENTERVILLE
Response times for POlice Ordered Tows for the City of Centerville
will be 30 minutes under normal circumstances.
The fOllowing Rates shall apply:
Regular Tows
Dollies or Flatbed
Winching (Minimum)
Storage per Day
Storage per Day.
Administration Fee
$70.0d
$35.00 (Additional Fee)
$60.00
$20.00 (Outside)
$40.00 (Inside)
$15.00.
The above rates are for Non-Commercial Vehicles under 3/4 Ton
with the keys available .for the tows.
. Should gas prices exceed $1.75 per gallon, a fuel charge may
be added of up to 5%.
Squad cars within the city limits, will be towed free up to 4
calls per year. After the 4th tow, the price billed out will
be $35.00 plus tax within the city limits,
Police Forfeitures: Normal towing rates, adm. fee, and tax
shall .apply. Storage of $250.00 per 3 months period
will be initiated as many vehicles are sitting for e'xtended
periods of time.
Office Hours shall be:
Mondays-Fridays-8:00 a.m.-5:00 p,m.
Saturdays-10:00 a.m.-12:00 Noon.
SundaysOPEN-3:00-4:00 p.m.
HOlidays are by appointment.
We feel these hours are best as most of the Police Offices
and Insurance Agencies we deal with are available these hours.
We also feel DWI's and Drug Impounds are kept qff the streets
and allowed to sober-up before vehicles are released.
(2 )
~,
4,10 l116'blC-5
Police OJ:"deJ:"ed
APPENDIX A
TOWING FEE SCHEDULE
t . CI/ZcdJ /9,//65 i-if:'k;~6IoA).
t ^ . cj(~
Non commercial, < % tons, with keys, within 4 miles
$60
-if more than 4 miles outside city limits, add
$3!mile
~if 4 X 4 vehicle, add
-flatbed \lSed, add
$35
$35
- dolly used, add
$35
-winching required, add a minimum of
$60
-administrative fee, all tows, add
$10
-outdoor storage, all tows, incI. 1 st day, per day, add
$18
-indoor storage, ifrequired, incL 1 st day, per day, add
$36
-fuel surcharge, all tows, add if gas> $1. 75/gal.
. .
$5%
-no keys, add
$~$.OO
-accident cleanup, greater than 15 minutes, add per emploY,ee,
~=o1f
$-55fhr. 70. 11;,
$5SArrs71'''''' ~
-difficult tows, dig/shoveIllaoor> 15 mins., add per emplo)'ee
Commerical Vehicles greater than % tons
-standard tow
$ market
-multiple wreckers required for single vehicle
$ market x 2
-add for all applicable above, (e.g. admin, fuel, storage, etc.)
$ as above
-;)7.
Police Department Vehicles
. Disabled squad cars
Police Errors
APPENDIX A CON'T.
TOWING FEE SCHEDULE
so
After first four, flat rate per vehicle
Police Forfeitures
Flat rate per vehicle
$25/vehic1e
i.",I'l'5~ .CIfI'8>t7!&on,'"S
$324.55
3so6 ~
Z 2"3 -rAy'
.:-----
~ eM
37.2.8" (YlDf..<>- 1'.
02'1.
?;f/'-;
~ce,
ALL ~/Jl/b -{- i!5tot/b~
APPENDIX A . /
Police Ordered
TOvnNG FEE SCHEDULE
t/~1 c~V;1r
Non commercial, < % tons, with keys, within 4 miles
$60
-if more than 4 miles outside city limits, add
$3/mile
-if 4 X 4 vehicle, add
$35
$00
-flatbed used, add
- dolly used, add
$40
-winching required, add a minimum of
$50
-administrative fee, all tows, add
$8
-outdoor storage, all tows, incl. 1 st day, per day, add
-indoor storage, ifrequired, incl. 1 st day, per day, add
$15
$30
-fuel surcharge, all tows, add ifgas > $1.75/gal.
$5%
-no keys, add
$
-accident cleanup, greater than 20 minutes, add per employee,
$601hr.
-difficult tows, dig/shovel/labor> 15 mins., add per employee
$601hr
Commerical Vehicles greater than % tons
-standard tow
$ market
-multiple wreckers required for single vehicle
$ market x 2
-add for all applicable above, (e.g. admin, fuel, storage, etc.)
$ as above
c2q
APPENDIX A CON'T.
TOWING FEE SCHEDULE
$0
$40/vehicle
$383.40
3(J
ONE DAY PLANNING SESSION
A COMMUNITY DIALOGUE INCORPORATING COMMISSION ADOPTED
GOAL SETTING
For citizens, police and commission to interact
To present a thumbnail sketch of the multitude of tasks our officers perform in the
community (officers and staff have agreed to speak 5-10 minutes on their
individual responsibilities)
To teach the officers the value of asking the public their opinions
To teach citizens that the police and commission value their input
To gamer support for police/commission initiatives
To obtain citizen input into attracting continued support, operational feasibility,
value to community (test of goals and objectives)
All elected officials, city employees, and citizens from our three cormnunities would be
invited as well as local media. (Quad Press, North Metro Cable IS)
The planning session would be held at the department.
3/,
Centennial Lakes Poiice Department
Crime Summary Listing
Monthly Report for September 2002
Agency
Offense Description
09000 TRAFFIC - ALL OTHER
09001 SPEED
09006 INATTENTIVE DRIVING
09008 CARELESS DRIVING
09009 FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE
09021 STOP SIGN
09022 STOP LIGHT
09023 FAILURE TO YEILD
09030 PASSING VIOLATIONS
09031 IMPROPER LANE CHANGE/USE
09034 BARRICADE VIOLATION
09040 TURNING VIOLATIONS
09055 OWl - OVER .10
09063 SEAT BELT VIOLATION
09070 EQUIPMENT VIOLATION
09082 FAILURE TO USE LIGHTS
09098 FIX IT TICKET
09099 TRAFFIC WARNING
09100 PARKING - ALL OTHER
09101 PARKING - DESIGNATED HOURS
09109 PARKING - NO PARKING ZONE (POSTED)
09116 PARKING - RESIDENTIAL AREA RESTRICTIONS
09140 PARKING - WARNING
09221 DARlDAC/DAS
09222 NO VALID DL
09224 VIOLATIONS OF RESTRICTIONS
09227 EXPiRED DL
09231 PERMIT VIOLATIONS
09241 NO PROOF OF INSURANCE
09242 NO INSURANCE
09260 REGISTRATION - ALL OTHER
09263 FRAUDULENT USE OF TABS/PLATES
09264 EXPIRED VEHICLE REGISTRATION
09282 BIKE VIOLATION
09302 LOST - ANIMAL
09312 FOUND - ANIMAL
09313 FOUND - PROPERTY
09314 VEHICLES - ABANDONED
09315 VEHICLE - TOWED/IMPOUND
09318 FOUND - BICYCLE
09420 ACCIDENT - MV PI
09422 ACCIDENT - MV PI - MV & BIKE
. 09440 ACCIDENT - MV PD
09450 ACCIDENT - MV HR PO
09496 ACCIDENT - MV PO - MV & DEER
09498 ACCIDENT - MV & DEER - NON REPORTABLE
09561 ANIMAL - DOG BITES
09570 ANIMAL COMPLAINT - ALL OTHERS
09571 ANIMAL COMPLAINT - DOGS
09572 ANIMAL COMPLAINT - DOG BARKING
. 09573 ANIMAL COMPLAINT - DOG ON LOOSE/NO LEASH
Total
3
60
1
2
1
6
1
2
1
2
1
1
5
4
1
1
77
146
1
5
3
1
8
12
1
1
1
2
20
2
1
1
8
1
5
1
4
5
3
5
2
1
6
2
1
1
1
1
1
6
14
September 2002 - Agency
09591 ANIMAL IMPOUND - DOG 4
09600 FIRE - ALL OTHER 1
09609 FIRE ALARM N/C 2
09610 CO ALARM 2
09710 SUICIDE ATTEMPTS 1
09715 SUICIDE THREAT (NO ACTUAL ATTEMPT) 1
09730 MEDICAL 21
09740 MENTAL 1
09751 DETOX TRANSPORT - ADULT 2
09760 EMERGENCY MEDICAL COMMITMENT/HOLD 5
09801 DOMESTIC 11
09802 PUBLIC ASSIST 115
09803 MOTORIST ASSIST 8
09804 FAMILY ASSIST 2
09805 DOMESTIC - FAMILY 4
09806 NEIGHBORHOOD DISPUTE 2
09807 DOMESTIC ESCORT 2
09808 CIVIL DISPUTE 9
09809 CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTE 2
09811 LOCK OUT - VEHICLE 16
09815 CHECK WELFARE 6
09816 INFORMATION 28
09817 NARCOTICS INFORMATION 3
09818 HOUSE/PROPERTY CHECK 1
09819 EXTRA PATROL 3
09820 SUSPICION - ALL OTHER ACTIVITY 51
09821 SUSPICIOUS - PERSON 6
09822 SUSPICIOUS - VEHICLE 17
09825 OPEN DOORlGATElWINDOW 34
09826 UNWANTED PERSON 6
09827 911 HANG UP 5
09833 ALARM - BUSINESS 17
09835 ALARM - RESIDENTIAL 6
09837 ALARM - BANK (N/C) 1
09838 ALARM - RESIDENTIAL (N/C) 1
09845 COMPLAINTS - MV 12
09850 ORDINANCE COMPLAINTS - ALL OTHER 1
09851 OC - JUNK VEHICLE 2
09853 OC - ILLEGAL BURNING 3
09856 OC - SOLICITATION 1
09862 OC - NOISE RESIDENTIAL 19
09863 OC - NOISE INDUSTRIAL 3
09890 JUVENILE ACTIVITY 15
09891 TRUANT - ONE TIME 2
09900 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICER 17
09907 SERVICE REQUEST 5
09910 ASSIST OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY 27
09911 ASSIST OTHER AGENCY (NON LE) 17
09912 SOCIAL SERVICES REFERRALS 27
09913 ASSIST DRUG TASK FORCE . 2
09920 W ARRANT ARREST (ADULT) 2
09921 WARRANT ARREST (JUVENilE) 1
09945 COMMUNITY POLICING 1
09951 PERMIT - TO PURCHASE 5
09952 PERMIT - TO CARRY 1
09970 FOLLOW UP 36
09980 DAMAGE TO SQUAD 1
A2443 ASl T 2-SUBST ANTIAl INJURY-POS FIREARM-UNBRN 1
S",pt",mb",r 2002 - Agency
A2512 ASL T 2-THREAT BODILY HARM-POS FRRM-ADL T-ACQ 1
A5352 ASL T 5-MS-INFLlCT BD HRM-HANDS-ASL T -AC 2
A5355 ASL T 5-MS-INFLlCT BD HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ 1
AJ251 DOM ASTL-FE-INFLCT SUBST BOD HRM-HNDS-ADL T-FAM 1
AL351 DOM ASL T-MS-INFL T BODILY HARM-HANDS-AD-FAM 2
AL451 DOM ASL T-MS-FEAR BODILY HARM-HANDS-AD-FAM 1
B2330 BURG 2-UNOCC RES FRC-D-UNK WEAp-UNK ACT 1
C1211 FORGERY-FE-UTT POSSESS PLACE-CHECK-PERSON 1
DA540 DRUGS-SM AMT IN MOT VEH-POSS-MARIJ-UNK 2
DC500 DRUGS-DRUG PARAPH-POSSESS-UNK-UNK 2
10060 CRIM AGNST FAM-UNK LVL-NEGLECT OF A CHILD 1
J3T01 TRAF-ACC-MS-UND AGE DRINK DRIVE-UNK-MOTOR VEH 2
JE501 TRAF-AC-GM-2ND DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV 1
JF501 TRAF-AC-GM-3RD DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV 2
JG501 TRAF-ACC-M-4TH DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV 6
JGR01 TRAF-ACC-M-4TH DEG OWl-REFUSAL TO TEST-MV 1
L7033 CSC 4-UNK ACT-GUARD IAN-UNDER 13-F 1
M3001 JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER 5
M3005 JUVENILE-USE OF TOBACCO 2
M4140 LIQUOR-UNDERAGE CONSUMPTION 18-21 7
M5313 JUVENILE-CURFEW 3
M5350 JUVENILE-RUNAWAY 6
M7399 OTHER-CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER 3
N2130 DISTURB PEACE-GM-EMERGENCY TELEPHONE CALLS 1
N3030 DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERL Y CONDUCT 8
N3070 DISTURB PEACE-MS-PUBLlC NUISANCE 1
N3190 DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS 3
N3230 DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARASS-ABUSE-THRT-MAIL-DELlV 1
N3390 DISTURB PEAC-MS-VIOL DOM ABUSE NO CONTACT ORD 2
P1114 PROP DAMAGE-FE-PRIVATE-REDUCE VALU 500.0R MORE 1
P1120 PROP DAMAGE-FE-PUBLlC-UNK INTENT 1
P2110 PROP DAMAGE-GM-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT 1
P3110 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT 16
P3120 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PUBLlC-UNK INTENT 4
P3130 PROP DAMAGE-MS-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT 3
P3310 TRESPASS-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT 1
TB999 THEFT-MORE 2500-FE-OTHER-OTH PROP 1
TC001 THEFT-501-2500-FE-UNKNOWN-MONEY 1
TG159 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-MOTOR VEH-OTHER 1
TQ159 THEFT-251-500-GM-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP 1
TR001 THEFT-LESS 250-MS-UNKNOWN-MONEY 1
TR009 THEFT-LESS 250-MS-UNKNOWN-OTH PROP 1
TR029 THEFT-250 OR LESS-MS-BUILDING-OTHER 1
TR059 THEFT-LESS 250-MS-YARDS-OTHR PROP 2
TR159 THEFT-LESS 250-MS-MOTOR VEH-OTHER 1
U328D THEFT-MS-SHOPLlFTING-250 OR LESS 1
U349C THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-251-500 1
U349D THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-250 OR LESS 1
W3140.WEAPONS-MS-DISCHARGE-FIREARM-NO CHAR 1
X2200 CRIM AGNST ADM JUST-GM-GIVE FLSE NAM-POL 1
X3080 CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-OBST LEGAL PROCESS 3
Agency Total 1155
Centennial Lakes Police Department
Crime Summary Listing
Monthly Report for September 2002
Centerville
Offense Description
09000 TRAFFIC - ALL OTHER
09001 SPEED
09021 STOP SIGN
09031 IMPROPER LANE CHANGE/USE
09040 TURNING VIOLATIONS
09055 DWI- OVER .10
09063 SEAT BELT VIOLATION
09082 FAILURE TO USE LIGHTS
09098 FIX IT TICKET
09099 TRAFFIC WARNING
09101 PARKING - DESIGNATED HOURS
09140 PARKING - WARNING
09221 DAR/DAC/DAS
09224 VIOLATIONS OF RESTRICTIONS
09241 NO PROOF OF INSURANCE
09264 EXPIRED VEHICLE REGISTRATION
09302 LOST - ANIMAL
09314 VEHICLES -ABANDONED
09318 FOUND - BICYCLE
09440 ACCIDENT - MV PO
09498 ACCIDENT - MV & DEER - NON REPORTABLE
09572 ANIMAL COMPLAINT - DOG BARKING
09573 ANIMAL COMPLAINT - DOG ON LOOSE/NO LEASH
09591 ANIMAL IMPOUND - DOG
09609 FIRE ALARM N/C
09730 MEDICAL
09751 DETOX TRANSPORT - ADULT
09760 EMERGENCY MEDICAL COMMITMENT/HOLD
09801 DOMESTIC
09802 PUBLIC ASSIST
09803 MOTORIST ASSIST
09804 FAMILY ASSIST
09805 DOMESTIC - FAMILY
09807 DOMESTIC ESCORT
09808 CIVIL DISPUTE
09811 LOCK OUT - VEHICLE
09816 INFORMATION
09818 HOUSE/PROPERTY CHECK
09820 SUSPICION - ALL OTHER ACTIVITY
09821 SUSPICIOUS - PERSON
09822 SUSPICIOUS - VEHICLE
09825 OPEN DOOR/GATE/WINDOW
09826 UNWANTED PERSON
09827911 HANG UP
09833 ALARM - BUSINESS
09835 ALARM - RESIDENTIAL
09838 ALARM - RESIDENTIAL (N/C)
09845 COMPLAINTS - MV
09851 OC - JUNK VEHICLE
09856 OC - SOLICITATION
09862 OC - NOISE RESIDENTIAL
Total
2
16
3
1
1
2
2
1
21
56
5
3
2
1
4
2
1
2
1
1
1
3
6
2
2
6
1
3
3
36
3
1
1
1
4
5
5
1
12
2
5
29
1
2
2
3
1
6
2
1
4
r-----.-.-.- --
September 2002 - Centerville
09863 OC - NOISE INDUSTRIAL
09890 JUVENILE ACTIVITY
09910 ASSIST OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
09911 ASSIST OTHER AGENCY (NON LE)
09912 SOCIAL SERVICES REFERRALS
09920 WARRANT ARREST (ADULT)
09921 WARRANT ARREST (JUVENILE)
09945 COMMUNITY POLICING
09952 PERMIT - TO CARRY
09970 FOLLOW UP
A2512 ASL T 2-THREAT BODILY HARM-POS FRRM-ADL T-ACQ
AL451 DOM ASL T-MS-FEAR BODILY HARM"HANDS-AD-FAM
C1211 FORGERY-FE-UTT POSSESS PLACE-CHECK-PERSON
DA540 DRUGS-SM AMT IN MOT VEH-POSS-MARIJ-UNK
DC500 DRUGS-DRUG PARAPH-POSSESS-UNK-UNK
J3T01 TRAF-ACC-MS-UND AGE DRINK DRIVE-UNK-MOTOR VEH
JG501 TRAF-ACC-M-4TH DEG OWI-UI ALCOHOL"MV
L7033 CSC 4-UNKACT-GUARDJAN-UNDER 13-F
M3001 JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER
M4140 LIQUOR-UNDERAGE CONSUMPTION 18-21
M5313 JUVENILE-CURFEW
M5350 JUVENILE-RUNAWAY
M7399 OTHER-CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER
N3030 DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERL Y CONDUCT
N3230 DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARASS-ABUSE-THRT-MAIL-DELlV
P1114 PROP OAMAGE-FE-PRIVATE-REDUCE VALU 500 OR MORE
P1120 PROP OAMAGE-FE-PUBLlC-UNK INTENT
P3110 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
P3120 PROP DAMAGE-MS~PUBLlC-UNK INTENT
P3310 TRESPASS-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
TB999 THEFT -MORE 2500-FE-OTHER-OTH PROP
TQ159 THEFT-251-500-GM-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP
X3080 CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-OBST LEGAL PROCESS
Total for Centerville
2
5
4
7
2
1
1
1
1
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
4
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
5
2
1
1
1
1
347
Centennial Lakes Police Department
Crime Summary Listing
Monthly Report for September 2002
Out of Area
Offense Description
09030 PASSiNG VIOLATIONS
09098 FIX iT TICKET
09099 TRAFFIC WARNING
09241 NO PROOF OF INSURANCE
09264 EXPIRED VEHICLE REGISTRATION
09802 PUBLIC ASSIST
09803 MOTORIST ASSIST
09815 CHECK WELFARE
09816 INFORMATION
09900 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICER
09910 ASSIST OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
09912 SOCIAL SERVICES REFERRALS
09970 FOLLOW UP
Total
1
1
6
2
1
8
1
1
5
1
14
3
5
Total for Out of Area
49
Sergeant Ron Nelson
Centennial Lakes Police Department
200 Civic Heights Circle .
Circle Pines, MN 55014
(763) 784-2501
OCTOBER 2002 SUMMARY
GRID 1
Sergeant Nelson
Grid 1 has been very quiet. Few if any vandalism reports, and the high school kids have
stayed away from the parks, probably due to cold and patrols. No crime watch meetings
were held that were brought to my attention.
GRID 2
Officers Gleason and Fruetel
No crime watch meetings were held this month however a robbery of Oasis did occur and
currently one person is in custody for this incident.
USE OF FORCE/RANGE OFFICERS
Officers Gleason, Krueger and Bragelman
Officers did not participate in any range or use of force exercises this month. Officers
were involved in use afforce situations in the course of their duties.
Jy
FLEETMAlNTENANCE
Officer Gleason
Normal maintenance was performed on the squads. The S-10 Blazer is back in service
after having a spring and shock replaced. The battery was replaced on the generator and it
is working well again.
EVIDENCE
Officer Pruetel
Everything seems to be going well in this department.
VEmCLE FORFEITURES
Officer Fruetel
The following vehicles were forfeited this month;
1994 Chrysler New Yorker
1995 Mercury Mystique.
1994 Toyota Corolla
FffiLD TRAINING
Sergeant Nelson
Officer Arntzen has now started Phase II ofhis field training and is doing well. He catches
on quickly and applies that knowledge. Officer Corlew is finishing Phase III and we
expect to have him out on his own by the end of the month.
SQUAD LAPTOPS
Sergeant Nelson
Laptops are working well. I am currently looking into purchasing one for the Centerville
Sub-station. Officers are writing reports on the laptops which is helping to cut down on
time spent in the office and traveling to and from.
:35
Corporal Mike Jensen
~ Centennial Lakes Police Department
. 200 Civic Heights Circle
Circle Pines, MN 55014
(763) 784-2501
. .
Chief Heckman, monthly activity report for October, 11-04-2002
This report addresses areas I oversee withID the department on a day-to-day-basis.
1) Vehicle Maintenance, all squads had general maintenance. It's that time of year to
order squads. We will be getting one squad this year and I have been working on
getting bids from Chev and Ford. The vehicle needs to be ordered generally by the
middle of October. We now have to the end of November to order a squad; the bids
did not Gome out until the end of October. I will be meeting with Chief Heckman
very shortly to discuss this information. Squad P-6 did have to go to Midway Ford
for engine repair in October. Officer Gleason and I also did a lot of in house repairs
to squads, examples burnt out lights, flashers and related equipment.
2) Reserve unit_ All is running normal, our thanks to all reserves f0T their hard work.
The reserves put hours in during October by riding with officers, on patrol Fridays and
Saturday evenings. When they are out on patrol they check businesses and do residential
patroL Reserv_e officers will be working several different events during the month of
October. The reserves worked the Blaine nome coming parade and all went great. The
reserves worked with Anoka City Police on three different Halloween events that went on _
in their city during the end of October and Auoka City Police are very thankful for the
help_ In October, the reserves put in 59 hours. During October we had a reserve meeting
in which I started review type training for squad use and radio use by the reserves. I
thank them for all the fine work that they have done for the communities. We also have
some new prospects for the reserve unit that I'm currently working on. My thanks to the
reserve unit for all the hard work they do for the Cities. -
3) Safety c<;>mmittee, I'm working on procedure for officers to follow for the cleaning up
biohazard spills. I have finished a draft and Deputy Chief Makela will be reviewing said
draft. I hope to have this in pJace by the end of November_The Fire Marshall also paid
. ~
us a visit in September_;' Weare in the process of making some changes that were in
violation of fire code. This will be completed shortly and then re-inspected later in
October. Fire inspector returned October the 18th and we passed inspection_
4) Emergency/First Aid Equipment, our stock of first aid supplies is full at present. .
5) Safe and sober is once again having seat belt enforcement in November 2002,' The
iline frame will be November 21st to December the 1st, During this time officers will give
3&.
"?
special enforcement to the drivers not using a seat belt. One of the prizes this year for
most citations issued by a department is moving radar. I'm hoping that the officers of the
Centennial Lakes Police Department once again meet this challenge.
9) COP/Overview from. officers.
7) Schedule. Corporal McCarty and I are working on the schedule together. We go over
vacation and other related scheduling items and make sure we have staffing on the street.
Corporal McCarty is in charge of printing and making changes on the schedule. We both
made this decision so as to make things work smoother and then only person does the
actual printing of the schedule. Corporal McCarty will address the schedule more in
depth in his report.
Officer Krueger works in grid 5. Officer Krueger advised that in his grid crime
was low and the citizens expressed concern about speeders.
Officer Bernardy has been assigned to grid 5. Officer Bernardy advised that in
gird 5 he conducted residential patrol and did business checks.
I work ill grid 5 & 6 located in the City .of Centerville. October was a busy month
planning for the up coming Safe and Sober seat belt challenge and department projects. I
. have been motivating officers to get out and do foot, bike, park and ATV patrol. Winter
is approaching quickly and we will be getting the snowmobile out and about also. I
believe that this is very important to the communities. I will continue to keep officers
motivated. During the month of October I was a call car often because of vacation fill in
and we are still in FTO with the two new officers. This will continue for the next few
months. Grid 5 & 6 during the month of October was busier with calls for service;
criminaf' activity was some what down for the month. At the October Commission
meeting Bob O'Brien With Safe and Sober presented the department with a new 'digital
PBT. 'the department was awarded this PBT for our high activity during the May 2002
seat belt enforcement project. At the October Commission meeting I also conduCted a
cable TV interview about Safe and Sober and the up and coming seat belt challenge.
During our October department meeting officers asked that we change the way we log
COP activity. At present we have a clip board for each activity hanging by the squad
room. Officers asked that only one clip board be used and that all COP activities be
logged on that and to put it by the squad room. r have taken care of this request and I will
monitor to see if this works better than before.. .
Corporal Mike Jensen 106
.
:]7,
Corporal Glen McCarty
Centennial Lakes Police Department
200 Civic Heights Circle
Circle Pines, MN 55014
(763) 734-2501
OCTOBER 2002 SCHEDULING
October had a large amount of time-off requests. Several requests were denied resulting
in shift switches and other juggling acts to accommodate officers. Our part time officer is
still out due to an iItiury and surgery which drastically impacts the schedule.
Officers took a total of 15 shifts off during the month of October that needed to be filled
to keep three officers on the street. They are broken down as such;
Vacation
Comp time
Holidays
Sick time
Funeral leave
1 I shifts
03 shifts
00 shifts
01 shifts
00 shifts
Officers were in training for 2 more shifts which made for a total of 17 shifts that needed
to be covered.
Part time officer Hinson covered {) of those shifts
Deputy Chief Makela covered 1 of those shifts
Investigator Blanck covered 0 of those shifts
Sergeant Nelson covered 3 of those shifts
Corporals covered 6 ofthose shifts
Overtime covered {) of those shifts
Payback covered 1 of those shifts
5 of the shifts were not covered
We were short street coverage 4 ofthe 31 days in October, making for a total of 195
days of 305 total days in 2002 that we were short street coverage.
These numbers will not change much until Officer Corlew and Officer Arntzen are both
out on their own. They will then fill in on approximately 40 shifts. We then should not be
short on street coverage nearly as much. It will also help when the supervisors are not
having to fill in on the shifts.
.
3'1
~
",,~~\. .~..~'.
'"'_....c, ,.',:( ..\_
:=..<:' ......0::"...'"
~~:~~'~F
",.-"p:r:!:1:;1iJ-,;r,
v::;";:~ ~:;::!~':"'-,:,.2 S'
tl:';;~~rm\t.
LAKES
Corporal Glen G. McCarty
Centennial Lakes Police Department
200 Civic Heights Circle
Circle Pines, MN 551)14
(763) 784-2501
October 31,2002
To: Centennial Lakes Police Commission
Re: Monthly Activity Report -- PREDATORY OFFENDER REGISTRATION
In the Month of October the total number of registered predatory offenders for the
three cities stayed the same, with a total oftwenty-one (21) registered offenders.
The city of Centerville bad one additional predatory offender move into the city.
The total number of registered offenders in Centerville is now five (5).
The city of Circle Pil'1es has a total of seven (7) registered offenders.
The city of Lexington bas a total of nine (9) registered predatory offenders.
Predatory offender registration checks were scheduled for the end of October.
Officers are checking all twenty-one offenders confirming their status. The results of the
checks are not all in yet, but Officer Bernardy has discovered one predatory offender not
in compliance with his registration. Officer Bernardy has contacted the BCA and is
beginning prosecution of that offender.
0Q,
Community Service Officer
Monthly Re-port for October 2002
October has been semi busy in the area of Crime Prevention. The weather has
been getting cooler which has slowed the Neighborhood Crime Watch Groups.
On October 12th Lexington Fire Department had an open house at their station. I
spent the day speaking with the people in attendance, handing out crime prevention
materials and giving tours of a squad car. The Lexington Fire Fighters cooked hot dogs,
chili and handed out fire prevention materials. Allina Ambulance service was also at the
open house and gave tours of an ambulance. Sergeant Nelson also stopped by and spoke
with people in attendance. A great day was had by everyone.
On October 31 the Eagle Trail Neighborhood Crime Watch Group had a
meetinglHalloween party. Most of the residents in the neighborhood attended as well as
their children dressed up for Halloween. They ordered pizza, had pop and passed out
candy. Everyone had a great time.
This month I fingerprinted several citizens at the Police Department [or numerous
reasons and assisted several persons in removing property from their forfeited vehicles
from Automedics.
Now that school is back in session I have been spending significant time around
the schools in the afternoon when the kids are getting out of school. I have also been
speaking with the students as they are waiting to get on the buses and go home.
This month we had the speed trailer from the Anoka County Sheriffs Office and I
spent time setting it up in several residential areas such as 87thIMarion Ct., Indian Hills
Lane, County Rd J., West Golden Lake Rd., 7100 Block Main St., 9100 Block Lexington
Ave. and Edgewood RdlDunlap Ave.
This month I also handled calls assigned, been working on enforcing the junk
vehicle ordinances before the snow flies, attended an Anoka County Safe Kids Coalition
meeting, brought squad cars for scheduled maintenance appointments, assisted officers
with other miscellaneous calls and have been continuing my patrol of the area parks and
beaches.
Respectfully submitted,
#'/~~
CSO Noren
/.jL/
Page 1 01 1
Joel Heckman
From: "Robert O'Brien" <sasliaison@worldnet.att.net>
To: <jheckman@centenniallakespd.com>
Cc: <kummrow@prtel.com>; <Susie.Palmer@state.mn.us>; <bkollman@rconnect.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15,20027:08 AM
Attach: Centennial Lakes Crash 2001.doc
Subject: Centennial Lakes Crash
Joel, Per your request for the cost of crashes in your community.
I combined the report with the Anoka County report because your citizens pay a
significant amount of the dollars towards the county cost also. One of the significant
items is the reduction in overall crashes in Anoka County and reduction in the
number of severe injuries.
The number of crashes from 2000 to 2001 was reduced by 358 crashes. The
number of severe injuries was reduced by 374 from the 2000 crash statistics. This is
in spite of the increased numbers of vehicles and miles driven each year. In the past
ten years (2000 numbers) we have had an increase of 502,103 licensed drivers and
1,103,261 motor vehicles registered in Minnesota.
The chart I left for you last week showing the reduction of severe injuries as
compared to the increase in seat belt usage displays how important it is to buckle-
up! The crash report showing a reduction in severe injuries in 2001 is really graphic
in showing how it concerns your citizens and confirms the importance of your efforts
in seat belt compliance.
Thanks to the efforts of your officers and the Anoka County law enforcement
agencies efforts in education and enforcement you have citizens who are alive, not
injured and have cash in their pocket because they were not involved in a crash last
year.
Thanks for all you do and I hope that you covey our thanks to your officers for all
they do. Your group always excels when we ask for help and we appreciate it more
than we can say.
)'11 bring a copy of the report on my letterhead for you to the chiefs meeting tomorrow.
Bob O'Brien
10/15/2002
IfS,
Bob O'Brien
Law Enforcement Lieison
13880 Kingsview Lane
Dayton, MN 55327-9516
Phone: 763-427-0261
Fax: 763.323-8183
E-mail: sasliaison@worldnet.att.net
Anoka County Crash Report "2001"
Fatal Crashes: 24 crashes and 26 people killed.
Injury Crashes: 1,568 and 2,323 people injured.
Property Damage Crashes: 3005.
Fatalities:
Severe Injuries:
Moderate Injuries:
Minor Injuries:
Property Damage:
26 @ $1,000,000.00 = $22,310,000.00
163 @ $47,900.00;" $ 7,807,700.00
818 @ $16,000.00 = $13,088,000.00
1342 @ $9,100.00 = $12,212,200.00
3005ial $6,500.00 = $19532,500.00
Total $78,640,400.00
The cost is based on the National Safety Council figures for the cost of deaths and
injuries in crashes and accidents. These are the figures that are used in national statistics
and by most insurance groups.
We have the exact number of deaths and injuries by severity in the state however; the
numbers of severe, moderate and minor injuries are not broken down by county in the
Crash Facts Report. I used an average of the actual numbers of those injuries in
Minnesota, so while it may not be exact it is very close to the actual cost of crashes in
Anoka County.
Centennial Lakes Crash Report:
We only have the costs from Centerville and Circle Pines as the state only reports on
cities of 2500 or more.
Centerville had 10 people injured in 6 crashes and 17 Property Damage Crashes.
Circle Pines had 23 people injured in 17 crashes and 32 Property Damage Crashes.
Severe Injuries
Moderate Injuries
Minor Injuries
Property Damage
2 @ $ 47, 900.00 =
12 @ $16,000.00 =
19 @ $ 9,100.00 =
49 ial $ 6.500.00 =
Total.
$ 95,800.00
$ 192,000.00
$ 172,900.00
$ 318.500.00
$ 779,200.00
Bob O'Brien
Sponsored by the Minnesota Department of Public Safety
'1&.
. c:i':)
(2:)
. c: C'-I
= c;::)
. - c;::)
="",
c:i':)1
= u;:)
_52 co
.... CD
c::L:) ~
c;:)
~
=
C'C
~
Q:)
--
........
--
cc
........
,~
. c:."
==
C'C
... .
cc
........
Q
~
'CI:)
=
=
--
:?E
.
..
CI:)
C'-)
::::>>
......
-
CI:)
c:c
.....-
cc
CI.)
en
-=
......
.-
s
""'C:;
p"
cc
c::L
S
t'~
:Z
0 :Z ~
0 ;::\:; ~
0 ~ 0 b ;::\:;
.- 0
\0 "<t N b
~~ I ~ 8
~~ I ?:J
I ...
..2
! ~ '"
:? J5
.s
I .~
I 0 ('S
I f' c::
~
::J
0">
0\ tz
0 .
8
co'
E$~.
. . ill
:f;
13
\01
,~-
'" ]f1~~
o~ it'~\
::l 1.1#
02" P4:'
- I r"!O>_, ,
.~ J.
; t:ftil
c: Il) 'j'
~~ .
"" ""'1
<V :;; I
., "...~<~~,
"...-';;~"-~~
,t'! ~
(8~
\Q
o
V"j
o
I.; I ..C',
: ,.-'..',--'iJ.'..::
. .
, " l' ..'c,"~
- : .-".~~".
~~';~"i....;;\%,grr:;Z!9---'"
,
I
8 8- ~ 8 0 J;7.
"<t co,
v;:,' \D
"<t f'l";' ,
.-
From: Swanson, Kathryn
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:39 AM
To: *AII Traffic Safety
Cc: Smith, Dennis
Subject: Dr. Runge
At a meeting I attended on Saturday, Dr. Runge (head of NHTSA) spoke. Here are the
highlights/sound bites from his message:
. Traffic deaths in the US are the equivalent loss of a fully-loaded 737 every day, or a
disaster like 9/11 every 5 weeks.
. Economic Impact: $230 billion/year -- $820 for every taxpayer.
. Impaired drivers -- and speeders and those not driving with respect for others __ are
terrorists on our roadways.
. Some say the "3 E's" are enforcement, engineering, and education __ he thinks they are
enforcement, enforcement, enforcement. .~
. Motorcyclist fatalities are up nationwide for 4 years in a row. They don't yet have MC
VMT (but it sounded like they were working on getting it), but he suspect MC VMT is
rising faster than VMT for other vehicles. He says helmet use is 60% nationwide, and
blames increase in fatalities on increased exposure, alcohol, and lack of helmets.
. The only good news: child fatafities are down. Fatalities among kids under 5 dropped
8.5% -- and he credits the CPS programs and advocates (way to go, Patti!).
. Alcohol: .08 is not a panacea. We need strict enforcement of scientifically sound laws;
we need cops, courts (prosecutors and judges), and treatment to work together; N HTSA
will continue to promote SFST and DRE
. . Reauthorization: he urged cops to contact Congress ("cpps have cache __ use it to
benefit the people of America"). People will be urging Congress to fund LRT and roads __
but we need to insist that Congress ~Iso funds- enforcement, because that is what will
save lives.
. NHTSA will propose a ~No-tiered grant program. the first tier will be formula-based (as
402 funds are done now). the second tier will be incentive based. States that can
achieve three goals (90% belt use, .53 Alcohol-related fataiities per 100 million VMT, and
1.0 fatalities per 100 million VMT) wiil have access to funds on this tier.
. There will be more belt mobilizations, and he wants an enforcement message for belt
use. USA loses $26 biiiion for lack of belt use (note: I'm not sure this jives with his
previous economic loss figure}. The medical costs from crashes is equal to the entire US
DOT budget.
. 2003 will be the Year of the Impaired Driver.
On Sunday, Annette Sandberg (deputy administrator for NHTSA) spoke -_ nearly the -same
message. Here are a few extra things she threw in:
. For the $230 billion in economic loss, we can get a breakdown by state and by type of
crash.
. NHTSA will want to work booze and belts together -- urge officers making DWI stops to
also enforce belt use,
Another speaker (Dave Smith from FHWA) said that a video has been produced and sent to all
law enforcement agencies with 10 or more officers. The video is "Safety Starts with Crash Data"
and it emphasizes the importance of carefui and thorough crash investigation and reporting. I will
give the copy J have to Marc -- we can can order more for our small agencies if we want.
One final quotation - I don't have a name to attribute it to, but I thought it might be a useful angle
for our belt use numbers: 'The progress we've made is significant. The progress we've made is
weicome. But we are not done."
.
1 (f.
emo e or
newr
.
UI
Making the Right Decision
By Fred Moyer, President,
Moyer Associates
Incorporatedl N orthbroo k,
Illinoisl and Planning
. Consultant, IACP Police
Facility Planning Guidelines
Police facilities everywhere continue
to playa fundamental role in pro-
viding support to law enforcement
- _' operations. And, with remarkably
few exceptions, they have remained UTI-
91anged. even as operational needs have
exploded. Population increases, new and
expanded demands for service, increased
numbers of police -personnel, and expo-
nential changes in technology continue to
affect the ability of existing facilities to
support the delivery of needed services to
the public. '
, Existin?; facilities that were built as re-
'!=ently as 15 or 20 years ag-o may now bt;
~xpenenang senous space shorta~eRand
other deticiendes. Older facilities present
even more dramatic conditions. They
may provide only 25 to 30 percent of the
space that is needed today.
bach jurisdiction, and each set of indi-
vidual circumstances, will clearly require
its own individual assessment in terms of
the extent and type of facility shortcom- .
ings that exist. The options avallable for
remedy will also depend on the <;ITcUm-
~ces. However... one of the most COID-
nly Tecurring questions, and usually
e first question, is "C:m we remodel, or
is new construction required?"
Before asking an architect or anyone
else to answer this q'Jestiort, the very first
. step shoilldbe to develop acomprehen_
sive analysis of current and projected
. __,,'1M. TIlEI'O_LICE.CHlEFIOCTOBER2002
space needs. This should be done inde-
pendently of, and before any, solution-
finding activity. Specifically, the determi-
nation of needed staff and staff support
spaces, as well as necessary functional
relationships and adjacencies between
operational units, will be the baseline re-
quirements against which different solu-
tion strategies will be measured.
This analysis forms a solid foundation
and benchmark for- the identification of
New construction is seldom
even considered until
officials have conclusively
demonstrated that
remodeling, renovating, or
expanding the existing
facility offers a lower
return on investment than
new construction.
avallable facility options and the eval'Jation
. of the extent to which each option can be
successful in meeting the identified needs.
For this, the "blinders" need to be removed:
existing facility features should not estab-
lish the limits for the definition of need.
With a function and space program in
hand, detailing the individual space re-
qUirements ,of eyery operational area, at-
tention can next be turned to the evalua-
tion of solution options, lnvariably, the
existing police facility will usually be the
starting point. In fact, new construction is
seldom even considered until officials
have conclusi~ely demonstrated that re-
modeling, renovating, or expanding the
existing facility off~rs a lower return on
investment than new -construction. If
nothing else, the comparison of these two
options and their related expenses will be
uSeful to the decision-making process.
Remodeling or Expansion Options
There are several considerations that
are going to help provide the answer to
the question of whether remodeling 'or ex-
pansion is the best cholce, Examples of
evaluation criteria that could be expected
to be important include the following:
. Abilitv to deliver the required c;pa~
(space program)
. Ability to group com~onents for effi-
cient o~erabons (needed a jac;encies)'
. A ility to provide needed:'seC\l1:ity
zoning :' ,.,.. .:
.. Ability to separate public, staff, and
pnsoner movements .~~.
. Abillfy to convey a civic/police facil-
ity image
. Ability for future expansion,
. Adequacy ot parking for department
and public. I
. Adeq'Jacv of mechanical, electrical.
and teclmolog-y support svstems...... '
. Total capital budget required for ren~
ovation or new construction .
. . Long-term operational costs, such as
staffin~ energ;Tr maintenance .
. Tune required for implementation
. Interim relocation needs and related
costs
. Facility visibility and accessibility to
the public . Jj. C}
--'r
~
eo
Pc
sl
0'
iT
d
P
t!
o
t!
IT
p
to
t,
OJ
t(
t,
t!
q
IT
"
Y
p
n
o
S1
c,
Addressing these issues willlikelv re-
quire professional input bv a consultant
experienced, in law enforcement facilitv
plannin,,;, How~ver, police professionals
should remain actively involved through-
out the process.
The outcome of the evaluation of exist-
ing facility reuse will be entirely depen-
dent upon the particular ciIcumstances
presented. However, don't be surprised if
the existing facility fails on the first criteri-
on of adequacY of space. The reason is
that it is not uncorrunon for police depart-
ment staffing and operations to have ex-
panded significantly with the communi-
ty's growth since the time the existing
facility was built or acquired.
In facti it is not 1.IDcommon to find that
an existing police facility provides only 20
to 30 percent of the total space that a de-
tailed programming analysis, including
the application of standards, finds to be re-
quired. The universe from which this state-
ment is derived comprises those facilities
where shortages of various kinds have de-
veloped over a period of many years.
The decision whether to reuse and ex-
pand an existing facility may be driven
more by site considerations than the value
of the existing structure. The ability to
stay at the existing location eliminates the
cost of an alternate site acquisition. And
the existing facility may indeed offer
space that has value in a remodeled or re-
cycled form. The expanded and remod-
eled police facility in Champaign,illinois,
is an example of this approach.
In the overall evaluation of an existing
facility as a candidate for renovation,. cer-
tain other ctiteria are likely to be promi-
nent Among these are the considerations
of existing mechanical, electrical, and tech-
nology support systems. With a facility that
is 20 or more years old, these systems may
very well be at the end of their useful Jives.
If the remodeling required is extensive,
" the cost of new- partitions, doors, security
systems, finishes, equipment, and so on,. is
likely to be just as great in an existing build-
ing as in a new building.lnfact, in.the most
extensive remodeling, the only retained
value of the existing building may be the
structural frame and exterior enclosure.
These components compose only about 10
to 15 percent of the value of the building.
It willaiso be important to evaluate
whether the functionality of the end result
will be comproroised by the configuration
of the existing facility. Apparent cost sav-
ings achieved through renovation must
be compared agaIDst potential reduction
in staffing efficiency and quality of ser-
vices delivered to the public. Unlike new
construction,. the outer limits of the floor
plan are already in place. The plan can't
always be shaped to distnoute space in
the optimal manner.
The New Facility Alternative
It will usually help in the process to
compare the features that can be obtained'
through new construction against thos~
achieved, from a remodeling or expan-
sion. If for no other reason, this should be
done in order to determine the dilierence
in cost betw"een the choices. This informa-
tion could be instrumental in tipping the
decision in one direction or the other.
For the purpose ot this comparison, it
is not necessary to develop a detailed de-
sign for a riew facility: It will normally be
sufficient to take the total "gross square
footage" that has been developed in the
space program at an average "cost per.
square foot" according to recent constrnc-
tian cost experience for similar buildings
in the geographic vicinity: To this, an al-
lowance needs to be added for site acqui-
sition (if any), site work, professional fees,
and other project expenses. Again,. the ser-
vices. of an' experienced professional will
generally be helpful and most likely nec-
essary to do this properly.
Quite clearly. the new construction op-
tion brings with it the ability to design a
PUBLIC SAFElY'S MOST
RELIABLE SOURCE
W1th unparalleled search alpabilities and rapid customer service .
.response, the power of Spillman so~e remains unchallenged in'the
industry: Over 500 users nationwide agree, Spillman. sets the standard for
software solutions in disp~ records management, mo~ile, mapping,
jail,. and imaging. Cotr.e visit us at IACP, booth 1533.
I
..l
Circle no. 120 on Reader Response Card
smlwml
~1Si1!!ik~)
Serving CUSEomers since 19i8
888./ /4.5562 . spillman.a>m
sa~i?"'qo@#Jillnzan.com
5D.
I
THE POLICE c...uJP....F/OCTOBER20Q2 105
facility that responds directly to .the local
law enforcement agency's policing philos-
ophy and operational needs. It also allows
projected needs to be anticipated in the
original design so that they can be accom-
modated "gracefully," or with minimal
disruption, when they arrive. This calls
for an overall master planning strategy to
be developed at the earliest conceptual
phase of architectural design work.
Even if the new constructlon option has
the greatest merit in terms of the cost/bene-
fit comparison, the question of the disposi-
tion of the existing facility willremain. Ide-
ally, the existing facility may serve some
other govemment need within the service
jurisdiction In fact, if it has such potential
and another department is going to benefit
from acquiring the use of it, the ability to
get a positive decision on new construction
for the police is going to be greatly en-
hanced. Wyoming, Michigan, presents an
example of this, where the district court
was able to expand into former police space
after a new police facility was constructed.
In another example---:-the renovation
and expansion of the police facility in
Champaign, Il!inois-a different set of cir-
cumstances was presented. The existing
facility was only 12 years old when it be-
came abundantly clear that growth in per-
nneI and police operations meant that
the extent and quality of services delivery
was being seriously compromised. Avail-
able lockers were insuffident for male per-
sonnel and almost nonexistent for female.
personneL LobbV space could not accom-
modate the number of tL.<;ers, and tnP.rP. \NrI~
New construction allows a
public safety agency to
design a facility that
responds directly to the
agency's policingphiloso-
phy and operational needs.
no space available for confidential inter-,
views with victims and witnesses. 1be list
of problems, similar to those faced in exist- ~
mg taOuues everywhere, went on and on.
In Champaign's case, howev~r, an as-
sessment of the physical plant and sur-
rounding site found that expansion md
remodeling of the existing structure could
be accomplished at a lowe~ cost than new
construction. Instead of a 'total new cOn~
struction project of almost $15 million, in-
eluding site acquisition, a budget of $10
million was adopted as feasible for an ex-
panded facility meeting current and pro-
jected needs and incorporating contem~
pOtary police facility design concepts. .
Ultimately, through the diligent efforts of
the total architectural engineering team,
the project was brought in a million dol-
lars under budget at $9 million.
The Champaign police facility is also
an el<ample of the critical importance of
developing a renovation and expansion
plan that allows existing ope:rations to
continue 24 hours per day and seven days
per wee!<;, unimpeded by the construction
activities that need to be conducted. In
this case, this was accomplished by
""'W!'apping" new space around the exist~
ing building for administration, investi-
gations, patrol, records, and public lobby
functions. Existing operations then
moved into the new space upon its com.
pletion and the "vacated" existing space
was renovated for support functions,
such as trainiri& break rOOID, roll call, e0-
dence and property storage, tactical oper-
ations, storage, and the like. Again, this
strategy allowed the project to be com-
pleted under budget and in less time than
originally thought necessary, .:.
operated by satellite or by landllnes. Your trunking system or any
other communications systems can be easily located throughout the
uni!. Central communications panels can b~ built for multi-agency
response. High-resoiution live video feed, as well as live video teie-
conferencing capabilities are easily integrated. The communications
aspect of the vehicie can be customized to whatever level of need
your department requires, worst case scenarios to high profile visibil-
ity in communities as a substation. We custom design the interiors
and the communications to meet the demands of your area of opera-
.tions. We do this in a cost-effective manner that will allow.even small
departments the ability to afford the on-site communications capabili-
ties they need.
· HIGH R;SOumON UVEVlDEO
· VIDEO TELECONFERENCING
· ABIUTYTO UPGRADE AS TECHNOLOGY CHANGES
· 28'1'0 3ll' MODElS WiSUDE-OUT
· GRAPHICS INCUJDED
NORTH AMERICAN CATASTROPHE SERVICES, me.
863 Washburn Road, Melbourne, FL 32934
Office: 321-259-0888
Fax: 321-259-1505
Toll Free: 888-595-6227
Email: nacsi@mihdspring.com
106 _ THE POLICE CEIEF/OcrOBER 2002
· COMPlETElRAlNING INCWDED
· WE ARE CAPABLE OF H~"JDU~JG ANY REaUEST
Circle no. 93 on Reader Response Card
....~(.
CIr1 J; ~13~1trV\ /'Yji- t1Jd5~
Page 1 of2
Joel Heckman
From:
To:
Cc:
Sent:
Subject:
"John Tonding" <John.Tonding@co.anoKa.mn.us>
<ROt DJP@aol.com>;<Rondot 08@aol.com>; <bmakela@centenniallakespd.com>;
<clewis@centenniallakespd.com>; <Jheckman@centenniallakespd.com>;
<e.r.peterson@ci.anoka.mn. us>; <j:b.babcock@ci.anoka.mn.us>; <s.m.nolan@ci.anoka.mn.us>;
<dhallberg@ci.blaine.mn.us>; <djohnson@ci.blaine.mn.us>; <dszykulski@ci.blaine.mn.us>;
<Cheray.Olson@ci.columbia-heighls.mn.us>; <John.Rogers@ci.columbia-heights.mn.us>;
<Tom.Johnson@ci.columbia-heights.mn.us>; <Bluml@ci.coon-rapids.mn.us>;
<Hawley@ci.coon-rapids.mn.us>; <wellS@ci.coon-rapids.mn.us>; <Creslikr@ci.fridley.mn.us>;
<SallmanD@cLfridley.mn.us>; <stevensr@ciJridley .mn.us>; <dguslafson@ci.ramsey.mn.us>;
<JKA TERS@cLramsey.mn.us>; <tdwyer@ci.ramsey.mn.us>; <dloth@cLspring-lake-
park.mn.us>; "Andre Champagne" <Andre.Champagne@co.anoka.mn.us>; "Bruce Andersohn"
<Bruce.Andersohn@co.anoka.mn.us>; "Robert Johnson" <RMJohnso@co.anoka.mn.us>; "Tim
Sink" <Tim.Sink@co.anoka.mn.us>; "William Plessel" <Wiiliam.Plessel@co.anoka.mn.us>;
<bfroh1 01@hotmail.com>; <poolclay@hotmail.com>; <dub143@msn.com>;
<gmmichurski@msn.com>; <hammes1 05@msn.com>; <kstrege@pd.ci.iino-Iakes.mn.us>;
<jkeating2002@yahoo.com>
"Chuck Jacky" <Chuck.Jacky@co.anoka.mn.us>; "Gordy Hughes"
<Gordy.Hughes@co.anoka.mn.us>; "Jan Jensen" <Jan.Jensen@co.anoka.mn.us>; "Jani BialKe"
<JanLBialke@co.anoka.mn.us>; "Kyle Blum" <Kyle.Blum@co.anoka.mn.us>; "Linda Hanson"
<Linda.Hanson@co.anoka.mn.us>; "Shelley Peetz" <Shelley.Peelz@co.anoka.mn.us>
Thursday, September 26,200212:20 PM
AT&T decision on CDPO
I have recently heard that AT&T has plans to announce, at the IACP
Conference next week, that they will be discontinuing the provision of
CDPD (cellular digital packet data, the network our current mobile data
system uses). The last date for CDPD will be June 30,2004. They will
also announce that no new CDPD devices will be activated after March 31,
2003.
In its place, AT&T will be offering a new data service, called GPRS
(general packet radio service). GPRS is like CDPD, in that it is an
Internet Protocol network.
At this point, all of the details are not known. We do know the
following;
GPRS promises to be much faster than CDPD - perhaps 5 times as fast.
It will be roughly comparable to a home dial up internet connection,
perhaps 50 kbps, as opposed to 10 to IS kbps on CDPD. This increased
speed holds the potential to permit our mobile data system to do more
things, such as image transfer.
The pricing plan for GPRS has not been determined. If it is priced by
the volume of data sent and received, and we continue to only send text
a!ld limited graphics on our system, the price will likely be lower than
CDPD: AT&T is probably banking on the fact that public safety users
will see the advantages of using the higher speeds to enhance their data
systems. AT&T officials I spoke with are guessing that some flat rate
pricing will be available by the time CDPD is discontinued.
.
9126/2002
.62, __
page 1, Of '}.
It is clear that some changes will need to be made in order for us to
transition to GPRS. Existing CDPD modems will not work with GPRS, and
will need to be replaced. A separate frame relay connection into the
AT&T GPRS network will have to be established. Some minor modifications
may need to be made to the applications we are using, however, no
dramatic rewrites of any software applications are antiCipated. AT&T
has stated that they hope to minimize the financial impact on local
agencies using their networks, so we will be working with them to
accomplish this.
Because the applications we use in the squad car are IP based, we are
well positioned to make the transition to GPRS, which is simply a
different and faster IP network.
Although it contains much more information than you probably want to
know about GPRS, here is a link to a web site that provides some
information on it.
http://www.gsmworld.comltechnology/gprs/intro.shtml
I wanted to be sure the Chiefs and the system trainers were aware of
these issues as soon as possible. I'm sure more will be learned about
the transition at the IACP conference, and in the months to come. As
always, feel free to contact me with questions or concerns about this,
or any Issue.
John Tonding
Communications Manager
9/26/2002
6J
Centennial Lakes Pollce Department I JOF CASE NUMBER 022355n
200 Civic Heights Circle, Circle Pines, MN, 55014. I ~::;~~
PAGES
ClASSIFICATION CODf CISP ClASSIFICATION CODe. OISP
CLASSIfICATION COOE DISP CLAS~IFJCATION CODE olS?
-
....LASslFlCATrON CODE DISP Cl..ASSJFICA JON CODe DlSP
RE?ORTING OFFlCER(S)
14803 MCCA~TY, GLEN G
.OAT l; RE,........RTEO . , ASSIG,=u I ARRIVED c~ EARLIeST CA, CJ j 1M!; OCCUIV'.ED j- LATES\ DATElT1Mt: oc.cURRED
101211200200:11 0011 0011 0100 101211200200:11 10121/200200:11
LOCATION Of QFFENSEllNCIDENT APT I GFJO VALUE $TOLEN VAlUE DAMAGED I VALUE RECOVERED
HIGHWAY 61 IN HUGO, MN HUGO, MN 55014- OA
PJJIU I REPORTl~~ PARTY'S NAME I DA~E OF BIRTH "' SEX MCE ~ME "'HONE
. .
ADDRESS I APT I CITY I STA.TE , ZI? WORK PHONE
NARRATIVE
I WAS INVOLVED IN AN PURSUIT ASSISTING UNO LAKES POUCE DEPARTMENT. THE INCIDENT CONTINUED iNTO THE CITY OF
HUGO, WHERE OFFICERS DISCONTINUED THE PURSUIT. ENROUTE BACK TO THE CITY OF CENTERVlLLE, SEVERAL MINUTES
AFTER THE END OF THE PURSUIT, THE "LOW TIRE PRESSURE" LIGHT CAME ON IN MY PATROL VEHiCLE. I PULLED OVER TO
INSPECT THE TIRES AND FOUND THE LEFT REAR PRODUCING A HISSING SOUND AND VlSIBLYGOING FLAT. THE FLAT TIRE
WAS NOT A RESULT OF THE PURSUIT, AS THE RATE OF DEFLATION FLATTENED THE TIRE IN UNDER TWO MINUTES, AND IT
HAD SEEN 10 MINUTES PAST THE END OF THE PURSUIT.
I REQUESTED "ALL TOWING AND RECOVERY" TO RESPOND AND FIX THE TIRE. ALL TOWING ASKED (THROUGH DISPATCH) IF I
HAD A SPARE TIRE IN THE TRUNK.OF MY PATROL VEHICLE. I RESPONDED THAT NO I DID NOT. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING
THAT ALL TOWING.AND AUTOMEDlCS KEEP SPARE TIRES ON HAND AT THE SHOP FOR OUR PATROL VEHIClES. MINUTES
LATER I WAS NOTIFIED THAT ALL TOWING DID NOT HAVE ANY REPLACEMENT TIRES, AND COULD NOT RESPOND. .
I ~HEN REQUESTED THAT AUTO MEDICS RESPOND TO FIX THE TIRE. AUTOMEDICS THEN RESPONDED AS QUICKLY AS
POSSIBLE, AND CHANGED MY TIRE WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY.
CLEARED. COpy
,
1
PERSONS IDENTIFIED IN REPORT RACE CODES O-ASIAN, N.BLACK,
NAME- COCX=S A~ADUlT ARRESTEO, AC-ARRESTING cmZEN, C.COMPLAINANT, D-DRIVER, F-PARENT/FAMll Y, G-GUARDIAN, J.JUVENILE ARRES1ED, I.INDIAN, M./NDrAN/HISPANIC,
M-MENTIONED, MP.MISSING PERSON.I-DTHERINVOLVED, O.OWIlER, P.PASSENGER, PT.PERPETRATOR, R-REPORTEE, S..sUSPECT. Y-VlCTlM, W-WITNESS W-WHITE. H.WHITEIHlS?ANlC,
W!-'JS!>AWC g.glJ,CYJHiS? :-lIe
NAME DATE OF BiR1H HGT WGT HAIR EYes
COPY TO
CHIEF HECKMAN
PAGE 1 OF 2
AUAS
HOME I BUS PHONE
AlJIU
NAME
HOMEI BUS PHON
APT
HOME; BUS PHON
APT
ALIAS
HOME/ BUS PHONE
ENTRY 1
APT
STATE ZI?
CITY
WORK /2ND BUS PHONE
ceu..; PAGER; FAX
APT
DATE OF BIRTH Me H T WO .HAIR EYES
CITY STATE ZIP
WORK! 2ND BUS PHONE CELLI PAGER I FAX
DATE OF BIRTH SEX RACE HOT WGT HAIR EYES
CITY STATE ZIP
WORK; 2ND BUS PHONE CELLI PAGER; AX
DATE OF BIRTH SEX RACE HOT WG'T HAIR. EYES
CITY STATE ZIP
WORK/2ND BUS PHON CELLI PAGER/ FAX.
0'1.
'\0
".-
t---
er-
N)
.0
"
bOp
.5 ~
" >
o '"
8~
" ~
"'0
o <::
~ (;lj
.... ...,
~
C'l~
H
CJ
~ ~
:S:'O Q
O;5::':l.O
E-t p:; 0 t-o
r" "'0 ~ I
'J..< oJ ......
U tR Z "I'
..... \:i ;g 00
Q" .t--
r.q 0 '"
~ ~ "--
. "'.~.-
o3,-'w
'" ~~
~~ t:
'I
I I I , I , ! \
IDQ,
t;,<:. .
y::..,
'.:.. " '..'1.1 "
.. .,- ',.,
,~,
-- ' ..
Ul
()
,~ z
_ ___.!!...... __ __.A-_
J
!~ J g~
~ ~ 4: tJ~
OJ _ ~
E, 'c
.- :::> OJ ,
r <;;: ,~......
J:, a.."i:
-"I 0->
~ ~
~ 0 ~.c
'~ ~-t
~ t? ~ O~
~ 6 Jl :p
i -g '5E~
r? L.J ]i:tl ~ ~ ii
\7 5- c'D en ~
o l.- tt..g -m
<D $ ~ ~ ~
'B-oo 0
o 0 f- --'
,/
:,..
\Jj
~
M
r1
J-
~
~
f lJ...
~r-I, ~
~otl ~~
'C 2'" '
o _"
3:: en OJ '"
OJ -'" C
-:::: ro __
~ 2 >
.-
o
if)
r6
:r
if'
r
in
~
I
j
j"=
OJ rt _ ~
6 ()
~ t ~
E '- (; g
o '" -0 ()
:r: OJ _
>- (,,) ~
'If
r:' if.
6 v'
, r
\fl
I OJ OJ '0
Y7 OJ 'B E 'os
0
-ll'-. Cl 0 F a..
). g~ I
~ I
t
"..
l- I
13 (yO C> I
J () a.. I
<f' '3J'
" I
.17 0<(. I
'7 ~ '
"
1 4-
'"
:; "
0 ~
'0 '0
OJ 't;j OJ
.D .;- %0 OJ 'OJ en OJ
'B <Ii ~. E en 'B
u:: 0 i(~ --' Q) Ui
<Ii '0 '" U
'" .D Q) - Z
>, () '" 'U) 0 '0 -~
~ OJ --' OJ '" <0::
Q) OJ :::> Q) 0
.8 > " Q; '" Q) (3
0 ';:: ~ liG .c 0 a; a:
" ," "0 '0 - [[
0 OJ OJ 0 \!l (J)
f- a: (fJ
55,
,Amial lakesPolice Department
JJ Civic Heights Circle, Circle Pines" MN, 55014~"
LASS1FlCA110N _ CODE
CASE NUM6ER
02243403
DIS?
coDe DIS?
CLASSIFICATION
CODE
DiSP CLASSIFICATION
CODE
OIS?
. CLASS\FICATION
CODE
DISP CLASSIFICATION
COOE.
DIS?
~EPORTJNG OFFIGER(S)
16776CORlEW,.JASON
DATE REPOl'{ ED
101311200203:12
LOCATION qF OFfi:NSE/JNC10ENT
OCCURRE:D
0403
APT
MAIN AND 20TH AVE. CENTERVlLLE, MN 55036-
l>JJIU REPORTlN.G PAR1Y'S f'.l.A.MS
MCE
HOME PHONE
ADDR~S
CITY
WORKFHONE
NARRATIVE
WHILE AT BREAK AT CITGO OFFICERS WERE ADVISED BY OFFICER HALVERSON OF UNO LAKES POLICE DEPARTMENT THAT
THE DRIVER OF MN PLATE JMH61.9 WAS REVOKED. HALVERSON IDENTIFIED THE DRIVERAS STEVEN MATTHEW DAHL
OFFICERS RAN DAHL ON THE SQUAD COMPUTER AND HE CAME BACK REVOKED. OFFICERS OBSERVED THEVEHIClE LEAVE
CITGOAND GO WESTBOUND ON MAIN ,STREET. I ACTIVATED MY EMERGENCY LIGHTS TO GET AROUND A VEHICLE AND THEN
GOT BEHIND MN PLATE JMH819. I NOTICED A PERMIT HANGING FROM THE REAR VIEW MIRROR OF THE VEHICLE
OBSTRUCTING HIS VIEW.
I APPROACHED THE VEHICLE AND ADVISED THE DRIVER HE WAs STOPPED BECAUSE OF THE TAG HANGING FROM THE REAR
VIEW MIRROR. IWENT BACK TO MY SQUAD AND CONFIRMEDTHE PAPER ID HE GAVET9 ME. I THEN RE'APPROACHED THE
VEHICLE: AND INFORMED DAHL THAT HIS DRIVERS LICENCE WAS REVOKED. ,I ADVISED DAHL TO TURN OFF THE VEHICLE AND
STEP OUT. DAHL WAS PATTED DOWN FOR WEAPONS AND PLACED IN THE BACK OF MY, SQUAD. OFFICERS INVENTORIED
, THE CAR(SEE INVENTORY SHEET) AND CALLED FOR ALL TOWING, ALL TOWING DID NOT ANSWER THEIR PHONE WHEN
DISPATCH CALLED. I ADVISED DiSPATCH TO CALL AUTO-MEDICS INSTEAD. AUTO-MEDICS ARRIVED AND TOOK CONTROL OF,
THE VEHICLE. '
I TRANSPORTED DAHL TO ,HIS HOUSE ON PRAIRIE DR. AND ISSUED CITATION 61$-338 FOR DRIVING AFTER REVOCATION, J
WARNED DAHL ABOUT THE OBSTRUCTED VIEW, AS WElLAS THE CIGARETTES HE HAD,IN HIS POSSESSION, AND CURFEW. I
ADVISED HIM HOW TO TAKE CARE OF THE CITATION, AND ADVISED,HIS STEPFATHERON WHERE HIS CAR WAS AND HOWTO
GET TflEVEHICLE OUT OF THE 11,lPOUND LOT. CLEAR:
PERSONS IDENTIFIED IN REPORT ' .' >' RACE CODES O.AStAN, N.BLACK,
NAME CODES A-ADULT ARRESTED, AC.ARREST1NG CITIZEN, C.COMPLAlNANT, D-ORtVER, F.!'P.REMiIFAMIL Y, G-GUARDIAH, J-JUVEJlIlE ARRESTED, 1-lNDlAN, M~NDfANIHISPANIC.
M-MENTJONED, MP.M1SSJNG PERSON, I.OTHER INVOLVED, ()..OWNE~ P.PASSENGER, PT.PERPETRATOR"R.REPORTEE, S.SUSPECT, V~VJCTIMJ' W-WITNESS W,WHITE.H.Wl-llrdHISPANlC,
-A 1.~NIHISPANIC. B-ELAC!CJHJSPAMIC
I'<<ME DATE OF BIRTJi H<?T ' WGT HAIR EYES
APT
0112611965
CITY
CENTERVlLLE
WORK/2ND BUS PHONE
57' 130
STATE ZiP
MN 55038.
q,EJ..L; PAGER/ FA?'
BRa
STEVEN MATTHEW DAHL
1835 PRAIRE DR.
Al,..lAS
HOME / BUS PHONE
AJJ[U
NAME
OAT OF BIR!
'MeE HGT
WC5y -HAIR
EVES
ADDRESS
APT
CITY
STATE lIP
ALIAS
HOME I BUS PHONE
WORK! 2ND B.US PHOttE.
CELli PAGER/ FAX.
NAME
DATE OF BIRTH SEX RACE HGT
WGT
HAIR
EYES
APT
CITY
STATE ZIP
_.AL1A,S
HOMEI BUS PHONE
WORK /2ND BUS PHONE
CELLI PAGER! fAX
AJJ/l,)
NAME
DATE OF BIRTH SEX RA~E HGT
wm . HAIR
EYES
ADDRES .
APT
CITY
. STATE. -ZIP
ALI~S
HOME/BUS PHONE
WORK /2ND ~li~ PHONE
CEUI PAGER/ fAX
,
E..'IlTRY1
cop,:, TO
PAGE 1 OF 2 '
6&.
Centennial Lakes Police Department
Crime Summary Listing
Monthly Report fo~ September 2002
Circle Pines
Offense Description
Total
29
1
1
1
1
2
21
40
1
3
1
2
3
1
5
2
4
1
4
2
4
1
2
1
1
1
1
3
2
1
1
9
1
3
53
2
1
1
10
1
7
3
1
18
2
7
5
3
2
1
2
09001 SPEED
09008 CARELESS DRIVING
09021 STOP SIGN
09023 FAILURE TO YEILD
09034 BARRICADE VIOLATION
09055 DWI- OVER .10
09098 FIX IT TICKET
09099 TRAFFIC WARNING
09100 PARKING - ALL OTHER
09109 PARKING - NO PARKING ZONE (POSTED)
09116 PARKING - RESIDENTIAL AREA RESTRICTIONS
09140 PARKING - WARNING
09221 DARlDAC/DAS
09227 EXPIRED DL
09241 NO PROOF OF INSURANCE
09264 EXPIRED VEHICLE REGISTRATION
09302 LOST - ANIMAL
09312 FOUND - ANIMAL
09313 FOUND - PROPERTY
09315 VEHICLE - TOWED/IMPOUND
09318 FOUND - BICYCLE
09420 ACCIDENT - MV PI
09440 ACCIDENT - MV PO
09496 ACCIDENT - MV PD - MV & DEER
09561 ANIMAL - DOG BITES
09570 ANIMAL COMPLAINT - ALL OTHERS
09571 ANIMAL COMPLAINT - DOGS
09572 ANIMAL COMPLAINT - DOG BARKING
09573 ANIMAL COMPLAINT - DOG ON LOOSE/NO LEASH
09591 ANIMAL IMPOUND - DOG
09715 SUICIDE THREAT (NO ACTUAL ATTEMPT)
09730 MEDICAL
09740 MENTAL
09801 DOMESTIC
09802 PUBLIC ASSIST
09803 MOTORIST ASSIST
09805 DOMESTIC - FAMILY
09809 CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTE
09811 LOCK OUT - VEHICLE
09815 CHECK WELFARE
09816 INFORMATION
09817 NARCOTICS INFORMATION
09819 EXTRA PATROL
09820 SUSPICION - ALL OTHER ACTIVITY
09821 SUSPICIOUS - PERSON
09822 SUSPICIOUS - VEHICLE
09825 OPEN DOORlGATEIWINDOW
09826 UNWANTED PERSON
09827911 HANG UP
09833 ALARM - BUSINESS
09835 ALARM - RESIDENTIAL
, -
September 2002 - Circle Pines
09837 ALARM - BANK (N/C) 1
09845 COMPLAINTS - MV 4
09853 OC - ILLEGAL BURNING 1
09862 OC - NOISE RESIDENTIAL 3
09890 JUVENILE ACTIVITY 3
09900 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICER 11
09907 SERVICE REQUEST 5
09910 ASSIST OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY 5
09911 ASSIST OTHER AGENCY (NON LE) 5
09912 SOCIAL SERVICES REFERRALS 7
09913 ASSIST DRUG TASK FORCE 2
09922 WARRANT ARREST (ATTEMPT) 1
09951 PERMIT - TO PURCHASE 2
09970 FOLLOW UP 14
A5355 ASL T 5-MS-INFLlCT BO HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ 1
B2330 BURG 2-UNOCC RES FRC-O-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT 1
JF501 TRAF-AC-GM-3RD DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV 1
JG501 TRAF-ACC-M-4TH DEG DWlcUI ALCOHOL-MV 2
M3005 JUVENILE-USE OF TOBACCO 1
M5350 JUVENILE-RUNAWAY 3
N3190 DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS 3
P3110 PROP OAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT 4
P3120 PROP OAMAGE-MS-PUBLlC-UNK INTENT 1
P3130 PROP OAMAGE-MS-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT 2
TG159 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-MOTOR VEH-OTHER 1
TR009 THEFT-LESS 250-MS-UNKNOWN-OTH PROP 1
TR029 THEFT-250 OR LESS-MS-BUILOING-OTHER 1
TR059 THEFT-LESS 250-MS-YAROS-OTHR PROP 1
TR159 THEFT -LESS 250-MS-MOTOR VEH-OTHER 1
X2200 CRIM AGNST ADM JUST-GM-GIVE FLSE NAM-POL 1
X3080 CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-OBST LEGAL PROCESS 1
Total for Circle Pines 365
centennial Lakes Police Department
Crime Summary Listing
Monthly Report for September 2002
Lexington
Offense Description
09000 TRAFFIC - ALL OTHER
09001 SPEED
09006 INATTENTIVE DRIVING
09008 CARELESS DRIVING
09009 FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE
09021 STOP SIGN
09022 STOP LIGHT
09023 FAILURE TO YEILD
09031 IMPROPER LANE CHANGE/USE
09055 DWI - OVER .10
09063 SEAT BELT VIOLATION
09070 EQUIPMENT VIOLATION
09098 FIX IT TICKET
09099 TRAFFIC WARNING
09140 PARKING - WARNING
09221 DARlDAC/DAS
09222 NO VALID DL
09231 PERMIT VIOLATIONS
09241 NO PROOF OF INSURANCE
09242 NO INSURANCE
09260 REGISTRATION. ALL OTHER
09263 FRAUDULENT USE OF TABS/PLATES
09264 EXPIRED VEHICLE REGISTRATION
09282 BIKE VIOLATION
09314 VEHICLES - ABANDONED
09315 VEHICLE - TOWED/IMPOUND
09420 ACCIDENT - MV PI
09422 ACCIDENT - MV PI - MV & BIKE
09440 ACCIDENT - MV PO
09450 ACCIDENT - MV HR PD
09573 ANIMAL COMPLAINT - DOG ON LOOSElNO LEASH
09591 ANIMAL IMPOUND - DOG
09600 FIRE - ALL OTHER
09610 CO ALARM
09710 SUICIDE ATTEMPTS
09730 MEDICAL
09751 DETOX TRANSPORT - ADULT
09760 EMERGENCY MEDICAL COMMITMENT/HOLD
09801 DOMESTIC
09802 PUBLIC ASSIST
09803 MOTORIST ASSIST
09804 FAMILY ASSIST
09805 DOMESTIC - FAMILY
09806 NEIGHBORHOOD DISPUTE
09807 DOMESTIC ESCORT
09808 CIVIL DISPUTE
09809 CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTE
09811 LOCK OUT - VEHICLE
09815 CHECK WELFARE
09816 INFORMATION
09819 EXTRA PATROL
Tolal
1
15
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
34
44
3
7
1
2
9
2
1
1
3
1
3
1
1
1
3
2
6
1
1
2
1
6
1
2
5
18
2
1
2
2
1
5
1
1
4
11
2
S8iJl8mb8f 2002 - Lexington
09820 SUSPICION - ALL OTHER ACTIVITY 21
09821 SUSPICIOUS - PERSON 2
09822 SUSPICIOUS - VEHICLE 5
09826 UNWANTED PERSON 2
09827 911 HANG UP 1
09833 ALARM - BUSINESS 14
09835 ALARM - RESIDENTIAL 1
09845 COMPLAINTS' MV 2
09850 ORDINANCE COMPLAINTS - ALL OTHER 1
09853 OC - ILLEGAL BURNING 2
09862 OC - NOISE RESIDENTIAL 12
09863 OC - NOISE INDUSTRIAL 1
09890 JUVENILE ACTIVITY 7
09891 TRUANT - ONE TIME 2
09900 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICER 5
09910 ASSIST OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY 4
09911 ASSIST OTHER AGENCY (NON LE) 5
09912 SOCIAL SERVICES REFERRALS 15
09920 WARRANT ARREST (ADULT) 1
09951 PERMIT - TO PURCHASE 3
09970 FOLLOW UP 11
09980 DAMAGE TO SQUAD 1
A2443 ASL T 2-SUBSTANTIAL INJURY-POS FIREARM-UNBRN 1
A5352 ASL T 5-MS-INFLlCT BD HRM-HANDS-ASL T-AC 2
AJ251 DOM ASTL-FE-INFLCT SUBST BOD HRM-HNDS-ADLT-FAM 1
AL351 DOM ASL T-MS-INFL T BODILY HARM-HANDS-AD-FAM 2
DA540 DRUGS-SM AMT IN MOT VEH-POSS-MARIJ-UNK 1
DC500 DRUGS-DRUG PARAPH-POSSESS-UNK-UNK 1
10060 CRIM AGNST FAM-UNK LVL-NEGLECT OF A CHILD 1
J3T01 TRAF-ACC-MS-UND AGE DRINK DRIVE-UNK-MOTOR VEH 1
JE501 TRAF-AC-GM-2ND DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV 1
JF501 TRAF-AC-GM-SRD DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV 1
JG501 TRAF-ACC-M-4TH DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV 2
JGR01 TRAF-ACC-M-4TH DEG DWI-REFUSAL TO TEST-MV 1
M3001 JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER 2
M3005 JUVENILE-USE OF TOBACCO 1
M4140 LIQUOR-UNDERAGE CONSUMPTION 18-21 3
M5313 JUVENILE-CURFEW 1
M5350 JUVENILE-RUNAWAY 1
M7399 OTHER-CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER 2
N2130 DISTURB PEACE-GM-EMERGENCY TELEPHONE CALLS 1
N3030 DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERL Y CONDUCT 7
N3070 DISTURB PEACE-MS-PUBLlC NUISANCE 1
N3390 DISTURB PEAC-MS-VIOL DOM ABUSE NO CONTACT ORD 2
P2110 PROP DAMAGE-GM-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT 1
P3110 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT 7
P3120 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PUBLlC-UNK INTENT 1
P3130 PROP DAMAGE-MS-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT 1
TCo01 THEFT-501-2500-FE-UNKNOWN-MONEY 1
TR001 THEFT-LESS 250-MS-UNKNOWN-MONEY 1
TR059 THEFT-LESS 250-MS-YARDS-OTHR PROP 1
U328D THEFT-MS-SHOPLlFTING-250 OR LESS 1
U349C THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-251-500 1
U349D THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-250 OR LESS 1
W3140 WEAPONS-MS-DISCHARGE-FIREARM-NO CHAR 1
X3080 CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-OBST LEGAL PROCESS 1
Total for Lexington 394
Centennial Lakes Police Department
Crime Summary Listing
Monthly Report for September 2002
Paul Revere Community
Offense Description Total
09099 TRAFFIC WARNING 1
09573 ANIMAL COMPLAINT - DOG ON LOOSE/NO LEASH 1
09710 SUICIDE.ATTEMPTS 1
09730 MEDICAL 2
09760 EMERGENCY MEDICAL COMMITMENT/HOLD 2
09801 DOMESTIC 1
09802 PUBLIC ASSIST 2
09804 FAMILY ASSIST 1
09806 NEIGHBORHOOD DISPUTE 1
09808 CIVIL DISPUTE 2
09816 INFORMATION 2
09820 SUSPICION - ALL OTHER ACTIVITY 5
09826 UNWANTED PERSON 1
09862 OC - NOISE RESIDENTIAL 5
09863 OC - NOISE INDUSTRIAL 1
09891 TRUANT - ONE TIME 1
09900 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICER 2
09910 ASSIST OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY 2
09912 SOCIAL SERVICES REFERRALS 8
09951 PERMIT -TO PURCHASE 1
09970 FOLLOW UP 5
AJ251 DOM ASTL-FE-INFLCT SUBST BOD HRM-HNDS-ADL T-FAM 1
M4140 LIQUOR-UNDERAGE CONSUMPTION 18-21 1
N3030 DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERL Y CONDUCT 6
P3110 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT 2
P3130 PROP DAMAGE-MS-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT 1
W3140 WEAPONS-MS-DISCHARGE-FIREARM-NO CHAR 1
Total for Paul Revere 59
..~
f~'s
'l" ~ ,~
~!>j~:'",P"~5'
tf2';;~~;lJ\L.
LAKES
Corporal Glen G. McCarty
Centennial Lakes Police Department
200 Civic Heights Circle .
Circle Pines, MN 55014
(763) 784-2501
October 31,2002
To: Centennial Lakes Police Commission
Re: Monthly Activity Report .- CITY OF LEXINGTON
Officer Colby Bragg: Grid 3
No report turned in.
Officers Patrick AkL.-ich and Officer Scott Langner: C-rid 4
Officer Langner and I are assigned to grid #4 for COP. Officer Langner and I
were not aware of, or invited to, any neighborhood crime watch meetings. Our COP
activities consisted of residential patro~ business contacts, business checks, school
crossing, house checks, traffic enforcement, and parking enforcement. The Movie Gallery
was robbed, and there was an aggravated assault reported in grid #4. No other Incidents
were reported during the month of October.
Officer RI. Stepan: Grid 7
For the Month of October, 2002, PBT calibration was kept current. I completed
extra patrols of grid seven which led to receiving anonymous drug info which was relayed
to the drug task force. New management in grid seven has been actively working to
r~move some of the problem residents. ATV was stored for the winter. I am looking
forward to snowmobile patrol assuming we have a white winter.
Officer Chris Bragelman: Grid 7
Officer Bragelman verbally communicated that he assisted in the set-up ofthe
upcoming night/adverse weather shoot for officers. He further reported that he has been
y!),
field training officer Corlew and is pleased with his performance. Officer Bragehnan also
stated that the principal of Centerville Elementary called Chief Heckman to relay his
thanks to Officers Bragelman and Aldrich for there presents at the school. The Officers
have been making regular stops during the day and walking through the school.
i!
RUSSELL A. BLANCK
MONTHLY REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF
October 2002
DARE and POLICY - Nothing to report
GRANTS - Nothing to report.
COP - GRID 3/0THER
-My COP activities included investigation of Grid 3-related matters.
INVESTIGATIONS
General Investigations
-General investigations conducted during the month included completing the
investigation of several pending matters and/or working on the crimes set forth for each
city below:
Circle Pines: continuing work on earlier residential burglary, recovery of
stolen property (prepare charging documents), commercial burglary (statement and
charging of suspect), theft of campaign signs, receive additional information re alleged
drug trafficking, violation of OFP/federal firearms violation (search warrant executed)
and robbery of Oasis Market (suspect in custody).
Lexington: felony level domestic assault (in custody arrest and charging),
crime victim's reparations request, aggravated robbery (Movie Gallery), aggravated
robbery/2nd degree assault of person (suspect arrested, charged and pled guilty).
Centerville: check forgery/counterfeiting, construction equipment thefts,
multiple thefts (prepare charging documents), and theft from elementary school.
-I signed in custody complaints and conducted interviews of victims, suspects and
others.
-I reviewed all officer reports and teletypes on a daily basis.
Background Investigations
-There are presently no background investigations under way.
YJx,
MISCELLANEOUS
-J backed officers on various calls and handled calls for others as necessary.
-J prepared a press release and related informational materials
-J was contacted at home to assist in a matter/provide advice on October 6.
-J assisted a Lino officer on a felony traffic stop in Centerville on October 7.
-1 was called in to take statements and assist in an aggravated robbery/2nd degree
assault of person on October 14.
-J attended a department meeting on October 16 and 30.
-1 worked the street on October 25.
-J was off on October 31.
-J assisted in the training of new officer Arntzen (domestic assaults/OFP
violations).
-J assisted the chief on various matters.
L
^i31
CENTENNIAL LAKES JOINT POLICE COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 14, 2()02
MASTER FILE CONTENTS
A. Letter of Thanks,FromTom Wilharber, Reference CSO Noren's Hones ty.
. . ,. > .
B. Letter of Thanks From Alexandra House Reference'Ride Aiongs and Community
+.nvolvernent.
C, Letter of Thanks, From Batman And. Batgirl Refetence ,Drug Free Crusade
, Support."
D. Letter of Thanks, to Sheriff Anctersohn From Chtef Heckman Reference 'Use Of
Sheriff ',s Office SpMd Trailer.
E. Let,ter of Thanks Frolll Anoka City Chid ,Of Police EdWilberiS To Reserve
'Officers Woods and Palmer For Their 'Assistance During Anoka' sHalloween
Parades.
F . Four" SurveYE1.
51.
'fftJ-r,1'!1i.r~v. "
lV'vJ V !y,y[~
c ,r. r , c"7
LS[CI./XiSnea 18:;; I
7880 :Jvlain5treet <w CenterviI[e/9vf'J{ -'1_7038
(651) 429-3232 ,,:tal( (G51) 429-8629
November 18, 2002
Ms. Jacqueline Jaross or Current Owner
7020 Brian Court
Centerville, MN 55038
Dear Ms. Jarass:
Recently, the City received a complaint in regards to the culvert that was insta1led in the
drainage easement abutting your property. It is the City's understanding that this culvert
was installed by you and is your responsibility to keep clear of debris and ensure that
ample flowage of groundwater is obtained at all times. At present, this does not exist.
There appears to be some sort of blockage and your residence was presented with a
correction notice alerting you to the same issue.
The City promptly requests that you clean out this culvert.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please contact NIT. Paul
Palzer, Director of Public Works at (651) 429-4750.
Sincerely,~. ., .-~
. i ," ./
'I ___/:" /..<J i i
"0 4, /
" ,:::~'\/" ' /1/.. _- , !/f;;
L.--- l,..L.--::J' .Y-/'I '.t/f/";7/?~'.".L....k:'1 y '-"u ./.' ___
,,' ,if ,v,?' &-"\-<_ ,/<-.,J /' ~-{..~
Ms. Kim Moore-Syke.s /(
City Administrator ' (j
. tervi{{e
'EstaG[isheti 1857
1880 'Main Street .. Centervi{{e, 'M'J{ 55038
(651) 429-3232 .. 'Ja:r (651) 429-8629
November 19, 2002
Mr. Robert Stevens
Centerville Elementary School
1721 W estview Avenue
Centerville, MN 55038
Dear Mr. Stevens:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Anoka County CDBG application packet. The City
received an extra packet so I am sending it to your attention in the event there is an
interest in submitting a proposal.
If you do submit a proposal and need a resolution from the City, please let me know and
that can be placed on the January 8, 2003 Council meeting agenda for consideration.
Please feel free to call me at City Hall, 651-429-3232, if you have any other questions or
comments.
Sincerely,_
. '~); ) I)'
.0___;,1 v . . /f / ./
0-;'~~:""'/ "}th'}<:d ~. /Cjtc~ J
/ / -~. c... .4tftV.j.-/
- Kim oo;e-Sykes / (j "I
City Administrator L '
CC: City Council
Sent 8y: Great Lakes Management Co.;
763 377 7387;
Nov-2D-D2 11 :21;
"lIlY IleIh elM.
eill' 01 eentoMIIe
John R_
Tlm"'_
fix:
fIx:lIl5'-..>>
r.x: 7$5-323 !aa2
fix: 7e3-~ !Ile:!
Chauncey Barett Gardens
Centervllle, MN
Executive Marketing Summary
November 11 . November 17, 2002
8R
A
Totol Units 2
Leased this Period 0
Total Units Leased 2
100%
Vacancies
Tolal Units Vacanl 0
Total Units Occupied 2
L .
e
b
o
6
8
o
8
1~
o
6
o
8
Page 1 J 1
Sent By: Greet lekes Management Co.;
763 377 7387;
Nov-1t-0216:35;
llIry_llaIIt
CII\IOlC..-
Jollnll_
r""v_
fIX:
fill: ee'_20
1Ill:~
,ox: 18U23-4ll82
Chauncey Barett Gardens
Centerville, MN
Executive Morketing Summary
November 4 - November 10, 2002
Total Units 2 6 8
Leased this Period 0 0 0
T 0101 Units Le<:1sed 2 6 8
TOTAL L 1~
Vacancies
Total Units Vacent 0 0 0
Total Unlls Occupied 2 6 8
Page 1/1
Sent By: Great Lake. Management Co. i
MIry BoIh DIY;.
CllyrACtalervitIo
John I'l_
TIm Vantol
763 377 7387;
Nov-B-Q211:16;
""':
'.k:8St~
fIlc:18H~
fOlC~
Chauncey Barett Gardens
Centerville, MN
executive Marketing Summary
October 28 . November 3, 2002
o
2
I B
A
Tolal Units 2
Leased this Period 0
Total Units Leased 2
Vacancies
Total Units Vacant
T 0101 Units Occupied
T A ,"E
l
o
o
8
6
Page 1!1
OVERTIME
11-4-02 through 11-17-02
Name
Date
Overtime
Reason
Teresa Bender 11-4-02 2 Elections
11-5-02 10.5 Elections
11-8-02 2.5 Council & P & Z Packets
11-9-02 .25 Canvassing Board Meeting
11-12-02 4.5 P & Z Meeting
Ken Cook n/a n/a n/a
Joel McPherson n/a n/a n/a
Paul Palzer n/a n/a n/a
Tedd Peterson n/a n/a n/a
Kim Stephan 11-4-02 .5 Prepare for Park & Rec
11-5-02 1 Prepare for Park & Rec
11-6-02 2 Park & Rec Meeting
11-8-02 2.25 Council Packet
11-12-02 2.75 EDC Meeting
11-13-02 1.25 Council Meeting - Cable
Kris Sweeney 11-12-02 1 Certify Past Due Utilities
11-13-02 .25 Certify Past Due Utilities
tervi{{e
'L..,lIJ6{i.slicd'IS5;-
,';
~
f)fnl~~)
~;i/,.h~lI.,
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
M9nth1y Gambling Summary
1\ /,1., <: /'
Organization Name: _VtA'O vf1,l51C~ d~ lL-\.'6
Gambling Location:
IAt-c-"'tt- (-;,1)"1$ P:czzA
}Olo<..-
MonthlYear:
Name ofIndividual Completing Form:
t:(1 ~tJl eJ fl,\ V,i:"}'~ C 1:4-
Ten Percent Net Profit Calculation
A.
Net Receipts - Total lines 2c, 3c, 8c, 9c
(per Schedule A if more than one (1) site)
Z:S '-{L..-
8.
Sums of lines 22 thru 33
(per Schedule A if more than one (l) site)
l.-'l<g'1
c.
Line a - line b
'\ lot-Ill
Miscellaneous Deductions (for this site only)
1.
Pulltab tax to distributor
ZOb,
2.
Combined receipts tax for this site
5,?:g
3. Federal Taxes (per schedule CID)
4. State Gambling Tax (per line II)
F.
Line e X 50%
AMOUNT DUE
~
< \'Sq; 1.. ')
<011/
D.
Total Miscellaneous Deductions for this site
E.
Line c - line d
40%
(ion;
List Receivers offundslor attach a
separate page
10%
< ~~ ';
Signature:
PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF
CENTERVILLE *DUE ANNUALLY
~ AS PER ORDINANCE*
4fi/G-,
tervi{{e
'f...)tdliiL)fi~,( [851
Organization Name:
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Monthly Gambling Summary
-.1)~ i3rt~~ s'4D;ul. C\~,,~
Gambling Location:
1rt.1..-, r^J,J
}D 10L.-
MonthlYear:
Name ofIndividual Completing Form:
b14.1J1 It-J "\l,SUJ:NC, (~PA-
Ten Percent Net Profit Calculation
A.
Net Receipts - Total lines 2c, 3c, 8c, 9c
(per Schedule A if more than one (l) site)
1<1110
B.
S urns 0 f lines 22 thru 33
(per Schedule A if more than one (1) site)
511 :J
C.
Line a - line b
19'1 \
Miscellaneous Deductions (for this site only)
I . Pulltab tax to distributor 57..'1
2. Combined receipts tax for this site -.J 19 'l
3. Federal Taxes (per schedule CID)
4.
State Gambling T ax (per line 11)
5
F.
Line eX 50%
AMOUNT DUE
1-:,1-1
<: ")CbY /
(\91,7
D.
Total Miscellaneous Deductions for this site
E.
Line c - line d
40%
(\1>1)
List Receivers of funds/or attach a
separate page
(\~)
10%
PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF
CENTERVILLE *DUE ANNUALLY
AS PER ORDINANCE*
~~\J\Wl \
. - \
Signature:
MONTHLY SUMMARY and TAX RETURN (&-1)
lawful Gambling Activity
Month and Year Premises
OCTOBER 2002 4
Address
19680 Harrow Avenue North. Forest lake MN 55025
Attached: Schedule A Schedule 82 Schedule F
4 13 1
(A) Gross (B) Prizes (e) Net
1 0.00 0.00 0.00
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Irganization License
03800
Name
Dead Broke Saddle Club
Schedule B-2 Game Count
155
1 Bingo. .
2 Raffles ( ] Exempt, Schedule-ER
3 Paddletickets. . . .
2 0.00
3 2,130.00
4 2,130.00
5 0.00
6 2,130.00
7 40.41
8 0.00
9 235,100.50
.10 237,270.91
4 SUB-TOTAL (Add Lines 1 through 3).
5 Last Month Line 6C, if it was negative
6 Adjusted Sub-Total (Line 4 minus Line 5)
7 Income from Interest and Dividends
8 Tipboards.
9 Pulltabs .
10 TOTAlS (Add Lines 6,7,8,9)
11 Gambling Tax (8.5% of Line 6C)
12 Combined Receipts Tax (Schedule E, Line 9)
0.00
2,059.00
2,059.00
2,059.00
0.00
193,821. 00
195,880.00
13 PAY THIS AMOUNT (Line 11 plus Line 12) Check to Department of Revenue. 13
14 Gambling Tax Paid to Distributors for Pulltabs & Tipboards
15 TOTAL Gambling Tax (Add Lines 13 and 14) . . .
0.00
71. 00
71.00
0.00
71. 00
40.41
0.00
41,279.50
41,390.91
11
12
6.04
9,359.39
9,365.43
4,620.86
14
15 13,986.29
16 GROSS PROFIT, After Taxes (Line 10C minus Line 15) to line 17, page 2. 16 27,404.62
orrect and co lete.
r Date.
~~ ;/r-C;?,,-
Pre parer 10 number
I u
and return is true
Signature
-0 ~ Gamb 1 in Mr.
Phone
. ,.... 0'1...- ':;'"1-'1~
ation 3350, StPaul, MN 55416-3350
I declare t at all
Signature
Chief Exec.
Signature
Pre arer
Mail to: MN D
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
MONTHLY SUMMARY and TAX RETURN (G-l)
PaQe 2
Organization License Month and Year
03800 OCTOBER 2002
17 Gross profit from line 16 of page 1. . . .
18 Beginning Inventory (Last Month Line 21) .
19 Gambling Product Obtained, with Sales Tax.
20 Goods Available (Line 18 plus Line 19)
21 Ending Inventory (excludes Sales Tax).
22 Goods Used (Line 20 minus Line 21)
23 Compensation and Payroll taxes. .
24 Penalty or Interest on Taxes paid during the month
25 Advertising. . . . .
17 27,404.62
18 4,373.22
19 3,743.07
20 8,116.29
21 3,985.68
22 4,130.61
23 16,880.12
24 0.00
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
26 Accounting and Legal Services.
27 Miscellaneous Expenses, Supplies & Bank Charges.
28 Purchase/Repair of Furnishings or Devices for Gambling
29 Rent for the Purpose of Conducting Lawful Gambling
30 Utilities. . . . . . . . . . .
31 Theft and Liability Insurance.
32 Manager's Bond, Licenses, Local Fee, Premises Permit
33 Cash Long(-) or Cash Short(+). . . .
0.00
265.00
667.64
0.00
2,550.00
550.00
0.00
545.00
276.00
34 DEPOSIT REQUIRED, Excess Cash Short Reimbursement(-) 34 0.00
35 Deposited Amount, Excess Expense Reimbursement(-). 35 0.00
36 TOTAL ALLOWABLE EXPENSES (Add Lines 22 through 35) 36 25,864.37
37 NET PROFIT (Line 17 minus Line 36) . . . . . . . . 37 1,540.25
38 Prior Month Profit Carry-Over (Line 44 from Last Month). 38 71,553.14
39 Approved Adjustments (Attach letter and/or Add Line 5C if not zero). 39 0.00
40 BALANCE Sub-Total (Add Lines 37, 38 and 39). . . . ~O 73,093.39
41 Lawful Purpose Expenditures (Line 11 Schedule C/O) 41 19.00
42 Board-Approved Expenditures (Line 13 Schedule C/D) 42 0.00
43 Total Expenditures (Add Lines 41 and 42) . 43 19.00
44 PROFIT CARRY-OVER (Line 40 minus Line 43). 44 73,074.39
46 FUNDS BALANCE DIFFERENCE from Schedule F, Line 22.
47 Pulltab & Tipboard UNSOLD TICKETs this month . . .
.46 9.00
.47 78,611.00
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
LAWFUL GAMBLING ACTIVITY
6-1 SCHEDULE A
RECEIPTS and EXPENSES PER PREMISE
Organ.license Premise Number Premise Name
03800 008 The Trio Inn
lines 1-10 and 18-36 correspond to Form G-l
1 Bingo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2 Raffles ( J Exempt, Schedule-ER . 2
3 Paddletickets .. . . . . . . . . 3
4 SUB-TOTAl (Add Lines 1 through 3). . . . . 4
5 Proportional Part, last Month G-l Line 6C. 5
6 Adjusted Sub-Total (line 4 minus Line 5) 6
7 Income from Interest and Dividends 7
8 Tipboards. . . . . . . . 8
9 Pulltabs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
10 TOTALS (Add lines 6 - 9) . . . . . .10
(A) Gross
0.00
0.00
1,650.00
1,650.00
0.00
1,650.00
10.10
0.00
45,154.00
46,814.10
18 Beginning Inventory (last Month line 21) .
19 Gambling Product Obtained, with Sales Tax.
20 Goods Available (Line 18 plus line 19) . .
21 Ending Inventory (excludes Sales Tax). . .
22 Goods Used (Line 20 minus line 21) . . . .
23 Compensation and Payroll taxes. . . . . . . . . .
24 Penalty or Interest on Taxes paid during the month
25 Advert i sing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
26 Accounting and legal Services. . . . . . . . . . .
27 Bank Charges and Miscellaneous Supplies & Expenses. .
28 Purchase/Repair of Furnishings or Devices for Gambling
29 Rent for the Purpose of Conducting lawful Gambling.
30 Ut il it ies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
31 Theft and Liability Insurance. . . . . . . . . . . .
32 Manager's Bond, licenses, Local Fee, Premises Permit
33 Cash long(-) or Cash Short(+). . . . . . . . . . . .
34 DEPOSIT REQUIRED, Excess Cash Short Reimbursement(-)
35 Deposited Amount, Excess Expense Reimbursement(-). .
36 TOTAL ALLOWABLE EXPENSES (Add Lines 22 through 35) .
Report Month/Year
OCTOBER 2002
(B) Prizes
0.00
0.00
1,595.00
1,595.00
1,595.00
0.00
37,393.00
38,988.00
Line numbers correspond to the Tax Return (Form G-l) line numbers.
Gss 7/99
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
(C)
Net
0.00
0.00
55.00
55.00
0.00
55.00
10.10
0.00
7,761.00
7,826.10
1,255.31
319.02
1,574.33
966.56
607.77
4,560.36
0.00
0.00
0.00
40.78
0.00
400.00
50.00
0.00
0.00
216.00
0.00
0.00
5,874.91
, .
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
LAWFUL GAMBLING ACTIVITY
G-I SCHEDULE A
RECEIPTS and EXPENSES PER PREMISE
Organ.license Premise Number Premise Name
03800 012 Wise GUYS Pizza & Pub
lines 1-10 and 18-36 correspond to Form G-l
Report Month/Year
OCTOBER 2002
(A) Gross (B) Prizes (C) Net
1 Bingo. . . . . . . . . . . 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 Raffles [ ] Exempt, Schedule-ER . 2 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 Paddletickets . . . . . . 3 480.00 464.00 16.00
4 SUB-TOTAL (Add lines 1 through 3). . . . . 4 480.00 464.00 16.00
5 Proportional Part, Last Month G-l Line 6C. 5 0.00 0.00
6 Adjusted Sub-Total (Line 4 minus Line 5) 6 480.00 464.00 16.00
7 Income from Interest and Dividends 7 10.10 10.10
8 Tipboards. . . . . . 8 0.00 0.00 0.00
9 Pu lltabs . . . . . . . . . . 9 13,260.00 10,934.00 2,326.00
10 TOTAlS (Add Lines 6 - 9) . . . . .10 13,750.10 II ,398.00 2,352.10
18 Beginning Inventory (Last Month line 21) .
19 Gambling Product Obtained, with Sales Tax.
20 Goods Available (Line 18 plus line 19) . .
21 Ending Inventory (excludes Sales Tax). . .
22 Goods Used (line 20 minus line 21) . . . .
23 Compensation and Payroll taxes. . . . . . . . . .
24 Penalty or Interest on Taxes paid during the month
25 Advert i sing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
26 Accounting and Legal Services. . . . . . . . . . .
27 Bank Charges and Miscellaneous Supplies & Expenses. .
28 Purchase/Repair of Furnishings or Devices for Gambling
29 Rent for the Purpose of Conducting Lawful Gamblin9 .
30 Ut il it ies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
31 Theft and Liability Insurance. . . . . . . . . . . .
32 Manager's Bond, licenses, Local Fee, Premises Permit
33 Cash Long(-) or Cash Short(+). . . . . . . . . . . .
34 DEPOSIT REQUIRED, Excess Cash Short Reimbursement(-)
35 Deposited Amount, Excess Expense Reimbursement(-). .
36 TOTAL ALLOWABLE EXPENSES (Add lines 22 through 35) .
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Line numbers correspond to the Tax Return (Form G-l) line numbers.
Gss 7/99
289.73
193.25
482.98
189.86
293.12
2,461. 26
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
135.00
0.00
0.00
2,989.38
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE G-l SCHEDULE B-2
LAWFUL GAMBLING ACTIVITY REPORT OF GAMES PLAYED,
LOST or DESTROYED
Page 1 of 1
ense 03800: Dead Broke Saddle Club Game Type
Premise 008: The Trio Inn PULLTABS PLAYED
Report Month/Year
OCTOBER 2002
MANUFACTURER's In-Play Ideal Ideal Unsold Gross Prizes IDEAL CASH Long Removed
10 Part # SERIAL # Date Gross Prize Value Receiots Value NET Deoosit -Short Date
AI PG932
AI PF254
AI PFl33
470000 09/21 7198. 5640. 1192. 6006.00 4960.00 1046.00 1042.00 -4.00 10/08
290016 10/08 7198. 5666. 2164. 5034.00 4576.00 458.00 284.00 -174.00 10/12
310132 09/21 2999. 2300. 625. 2374.00 1815.00 559.00 618.00 59.00 10/13
TP 13779-MN 0923232 09/27 3120. 2390. 1251. 1869.00 1545.00 324.00 334.00 10.00 10/13
AI PF199 120098 09/17 2999. 2313. 1745. 1254.00 1401.00 -147.00 -215.00 -68.00 10/15
2443544 10/18 3000. 2325.
O. 2999.00 2311.00 688.00 716.00 28.00 10/18
O. 3024.00 2314.00 710.00 710.00 0.00 10/18
O. 3000.00 2325.00 675.00 662.00 -13.00 10/21
Al PF284 230040 10/13 2999. 2313.
TP 13705-MN 0912364 10/13 3024. 2320.
AN 32304
AI PF203
AT PF220
HI 7670
AI PF383
190002 10/12 7198. 5666. 1950. 5248.00 4469.00 779.00 761.00 -18.00 10/23
490031 09/28 7198. 5666. 2792. 4406.00 3926.00 480.00 471.00 -9.00 10/24
8987918 10/21 3168. 2448. 426. 2742.00 2085.00 657.00 667.00 10.00 10/24
390043 10/24 7198. 5666.
O. 7198.00 5666.00 1532.00 1495.00 -37.00 10/28
Column I J K L M N
TOTAL THIS PAGE .......... line 16 12145. 45154. 37393. 7761.00 7545.00 -216.00
Total from previous page ......... O. o. o. 0.00 0.00 0.00
TO TAX RETURN or.to next page 12145. 45154. 37393. 7761.00 7545.00 -216.00
Gss 07/99
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE G-l SCHEDULE B-2
LAWFUL GAMBLING ACTIVITY REPORT OF GAMES PLAYED,
LOST or DESTROYED
Page 1 of 1
License 03800: Dead Broke Saddle Club Game Type
Premise 012: Wise Guys Pizza & Pub PULLTABS PLAYED
Report Month/ye
OCTOBER 2002
MANUFACTURER's In-Play Ideal Ideal Unsold Gross Prizes IDEAL CASH Long Removed
10 Part # SERIAL # Date Gross Prize Value Receiots Value NET Deoosit -Short ~
AI PF284
130033 09/27 2999. 2313. 1658. 1341.00 1327.00
14.00
3.00 -11.00 10/04
AI PF216 420150 10/05 2999. 2329. 600. 2399.00 1906.00 493.00 492.00 -1.00 10/18
TP 13705-MN 0912379 09/29 3024. 2320. 952. 2072.00 1613.00 459.00 448.00 -11.00 10/21
GT 4639
TP 13430-MN
GT 4602
5446611 10/18 3038. 2330. O.
0859122 09/20 7200. 5640. 4318.
5431629 09/28 3136. 2454. 1608.
3038.00 2330.00
2882.00 2311.00
1528.00 1447.00
708.00
571. 00
81. 00
776.00 68.00 10/24
467.00 -104.00 10/30
5.00 -76.00 10/30
Column I J K L M N
TOTAL THIS PAGE .......... Line 16 9136. 13260. 10934. 2326.00 2191.00 -135.00
Total from previous page ......... O. O. O. 0.00 0.00 0.00
TO TAX RETURN or to next page 9136. 13260. 10934. 2326.00 2191.00 -135.00
Gss 07/99
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE G-l SCHEDULE B-2
LAWFUL GAMBLING ACTIVITY REPORT OF GAMES PLAYED, Page 1 of 4
LOST or DESTROYED
ense 03800: Dead Broke Saddle Club Game Type Report Month/Year
Premise 008: The Trio Inn PADDLE TICKETS PLAYED OCTOBER 2002
MANUFACTURER's In-Play Ideal Ideal Unsold Gross Prizes IDEAL CASH Long Removed
ID Part # SERIAL # Date ~ Prize Value Receipts Value NET Deposit -Short ~
JM 30#TICKET 407288 10/04 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/04
S
JM 30#TICKET 407289 10/04 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/04
S
JM 30#TI CKET 407290 10/04 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/04
S
JM 30#TICKET 407291 10/04 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/04
S
JM 30#TICKET 407292 10/04 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/04
S
JM 30#TICKET 407293 10/04 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/04
S
JM 30#TICKET 407294 10/04 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/04
S
JM 30#TICKET 407295 10/04 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1. 00 0.00 10/04
S
JM 30#TICKET 407296 10/04 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/04
S
JM 30#TICKET 407297 10/04 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/04
S
'-.. 30#TICKET 407298 10/04 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/04
S
JM 30#TICKET 407299 10/04 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/04
S
JM 30#T! CKET 407300 10/04 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/04
S
JM 30#T!CKET 407101 10/04 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/04
S
JM 30#T! CKET 407102 10/04 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/04
S
Column I J K L M N
TOTAL THIS PAGE .............. Line 16 O. 450. 435. 15.00 15.00 0.00
Total from previous page ......... O. o. o. 0.00 0.00 0.00
TO TAX RETURN or to next page O. 450. 435. 15.00 15.00 0.00
Gss 07/99
, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE G-1 SCHEDULE B-2
LAWFUL GAMBLING ACTIVITY REPORT OF GAMES PLAYED, Page 2 of 4
LOST or DESTROYED
License 03800: Dead Broke Saddle Club Game Type Report MonthjYe
Premise 008: The Trio Inn PADDLE TICKETS PLAYED OCTOBER 2002
MANUFACTURER's In-Play Ideal Ideal Unsold Gross Prizes IDEAL CASH Long Removed
ID Part If SERIAL If ~ Gross Prize Value ReceiDts Value NET DeDosit -Short ~
JM 30#TICKET 407703 10/11 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/11
S
JM 30#TICKET 407704 10/11 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/11
S
JM 30#TICKET 407705 10/11 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/11
S
JM 30#TICKET 407706 10/11 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/11
S
JM 30#TI CKET 407707 10/11 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/11
S
JM 30#TICKET 407708 10/11 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/11
S
JM 30#TlCKET 407709 10/11 30. . 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/11
S
JM 30#TICKET 407710 10/11 30. 29. O. :30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/11
S
JM 30#TICKET 407711 10/11 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/11
S
JM 30#TICKET 407712 10/11 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/11
S
JM 30#TICKET 407713 10/11 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10,
S
JM 30#TICKET 407714 10/11 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/11
S
JM 30#TICKET 407715 10/18 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/18
S
JM 30#TICKET 407716 10/18 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/18
S
JM 30#TICKET 407717 10/18 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/18
S
Column I J K L M N
TOTAL THIS PAGE .......... Line 16 O. 450. 435. 15.00 15.00 0.00
Total from previous page ...... ... O. 450. 435. 15.00 15.00 0.00
TO TAX RETURN or to next page O. 900. 870. 30.00 30.00 0.00
Gss 07/99
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE G-I SCHEDULE B-2
I LAWFUL GAMBLING ACTIVITY REPORT OF GAMES PLAYED, Page 4 of 4
lOST or DESTROYED
License 03800: Dead Broke Saddle Club Game Type Report MonthjYe
Premise 008: The Trio Inn PADDLE TICKETS PLAYED OCTOBER 2002
I MANUFACTURER's In-Play Ideal Ideal Unsold Gross Prizes IDEAL CASH Long Removed
ID Part # SERIAL # Date Gross Prize Value Receiots Value NET Deposit -Short Date
JM 30#TICKET 407733 10/25 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/25
S
JM 30#TICKET 407734 10/25 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/25
S
JM 30#TICKET 407735 10/25 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/25
S
JM 30#TICKET 407736 10/25 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/25
S
JM 30#TICKET 407737 10/25 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/25
S
JM 30#TICKET 407738 10/25 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/25
S
JM 30#TICKET 407739 10/25 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/25
S
JM 30#TICKET 407740 10/25 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/25
S
JM 30#TICKET 407741 10/25 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/25
S
JM 30#TICKET 407742 10/25 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/25
S
Column I J K L M N
TOTAL THIS PAGE .......... Line 16 O. 300. 290. 10.00 10.00 0.00
Total from previous page ......... O. 1350. 1305. 45.00 45.00 0.00
TO TAX RETURN or to next page O. 1650. 1595. 55.00 55.00 0.00
Gss 07/99
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE G-I SCHEDULE B-2
LAWFUL GAMBLING ACTIVITY REPORT OF GAMES PLAYED, Page 1 of 2
LOST or DESTROYED
ense 03800: Dead Broke Saddle Club Game Type Report MonthfYear
Premise 012: Wise Guys Pizza & Pub PADDLE TICKETS PLAYED OCTOBER 2002
MANUFACTURER's In-Play Ideal Ideal Unsold Gross Prizes IDEAL CASH Long Removed
ID Part II SERIAL II Date Gross Prize Value Receiots Value NET Deoosit -Short Date
JM 30llTICKET 408043 10/06 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/06
S
JM 30#TICKET 408044 10/06 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/06
S
JM 30#TI CKET 408045 10/06 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/06
S
JM 30#TICKET 408046 10/13 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/13
S
JM 30#TICKET 408047 10/13 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/13
S
JM 30#TICKET 408048 10/13 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/13
S
JM 30#TICKET 408049 10/20 30. . 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/20
S
JM 30#TICKET 408050 10/20 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/20
S
JM 30#TICKET 408051 10/20 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/20
S
'u 30#TICKET 408052 10/20 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/20
S
vI" 30#TICKET 408053 10/27 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/27
S
JM 30llTICKET 408054 10/27 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/27
S
JM 30#TICKET 408055 10/27 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/27
S
JM 30llTICKET 408056 10/27 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/27
S
JM 30#TICKET 408057 10/27 30. 29. O. 30.00 29.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10/27
S
Column I J K L M N
TOTAL THIS PAGE .......... Line 16 O. 450. 435. 15.00 15.00 0.00
Total from previous page ......... O. o. o. 0.00 0.00 0.00
TO TAX RETURN or to next page O. 450. 435. 15.00 15.00 0.00
Gss 07/99
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
LAWFUL GAMBLING ACTIVITY
&-1 SCHEDULE B-2
REPORT OF GAMES PLAYED,
LOST or DESTROYED
Page 2 of 2
License 03800: Dead Broke Saddle Club
Premise 012: Wise Guys Pizza & Pub
Game Type Report Month/ye
PADDLE TICKETS PLAYED OCTOBER 2002
MANUFACTURER's In-Play Ideal Ideal Unsold Gross Prizes IDEAL CASH Long Removed
10 Part # SERIAL # Date Gross Prize Value ReceiDts Value NET DeDosit -Short Date
JM 30#TICKET 408058 10/27 30. 29.
S
o.
30.00 29.00
1.00
1.00
0.00 10/27
Column I J K L M N
TOTAL THIS PAGE .......... Line 16 O. 30. 29. 1.00 1.00 0.00
Tota 1 from previous page ......... O. 450. 435. 15.00 15.00 0.00
TO TAX RETURN or to next page O. 480. 464. 16.00 16.00 0.00
Gss 07/99
MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING
SCHEDULE C/O
Organization License Month/year Page of Amended
Dead Broke Saddle Club 03800 OCTOBER 2002 1 1 Schedule?
NO
SCHEDULE C: Lawful Purpose Expenditures
Approved Date of
By Oraan Check
Check
Number Check Made Out To:
Reason Benefits
TRCS Code M/F
a(8)
Amount
09/24/2002 10/21/2002 6887 City of Lino Lakes
City Tax
19.00
Total for ALL PAGES:
to Tax Return Line 41.
19.00
SCHEDULE D: Board Approved Expenditures
Approved Date of
By Oraan Check
Check
Number Check Made Out To:
Reason
TRCS Code
Date
Approved
Amount By Board
Total for ALL PAGES:
to Tax Return Line 42.
I declare this Schedule is complete and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Chl~ ~
Executive ;S______
Gambling A . ~
anager u./ -
Mail to: GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD Suite #300 South
1711 West County Road B
Roseville, MN 55113
0.00
Date
//-/"1'cZ--
Date //-/r-eY'-
Gss 08/98
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
LAWFUL GAMBLING ACTIVITY '
G-l SCHEDULE F
GAMBLING FUND RECONCILIATION
14 9.365.43
15 0.00
16 0.00
17 0.00
18 0.00
19 9.365.43
Organization Name License Number
Dead Broke Saddle Club 03800
GamblinQ checkinQ aCCQunt
1 End-of-month checking account balance from statements
2 Deposits made during the month not included in line 1
3 Add 1 i nes 1 and 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4 Checks written during the month not included in line 1.
5 RECONCILED BANK BALANCE (line 3 minus line 4) ....
Other funds not included in CheckinQ Balance
6 Starting banks for games. . 6a 8.300.00
Reimbursment after monthend. 6b 0.00
Monthend cash balance in starting banks. 6
8.300.00
7 Total ending inventory (G-l line 21) 7
3.985.68
0.00
0.00
8 Deposit after month-end for Games in G-l 8
9 Total in Savings & Other funds . . . 9
10 Excess shortages (G-l, 34) and prior
reimbursement due for excess shortages 10
0.00
11 Fund Loss. (LG-250) . . . . l1a
Refund Due (G-7430) . . . . llb
Open-Game prizes,by check. lIe
Prizes bought, not awarded. lId
Other additions. . . lle
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Tota 1 11
0.00
12 Add lines 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 . .
13 Add lines 5 and 12 . . . . . . .
Unoaid ObliQations and Ooen Game Deoosits
14 Tax from G-l line 13 and any
prior months taxes. . . . . .
15 Deposits for games still in play
16 Loaned amounts included in bank statement.
17 Product part of unpaid invoices.
18 Other subtractions .
19 Add Lines 14 through 18.
I...CWY\
12
13
12.285.68
82.439.82
20
21
22
73.074.39
73.074.39
0.00
612/464-7225
"
General Fund
Monthly Financial Report
Month Ended October 31, 2002
MTD YTD Budget Variance % of Budget
10/31102 2002 2002 +(-) Used
Revenues:
Taxes & Assessments (530.04) 719,306.82 1,480,62300 761,316.18 48.58%
Licenses & Permits 48,240.68 316,363.19 200,50000 (115,863.19) 157.79%
Fines & Forfeits 0.00 13,585.40 25,00000 11,414.60 54.34%
Intergovernmental 21,922.30 77,089.14 15,000.00 (62,089.14) 513.93%
Charges for Services 1,652.09 27,288.09 500.00 (26,788.09) 5457.62%
Interest Earnings 1,254.91 10,552.78 40,00000 29,447.22 26.38%
Miscellaneous Revenues 172.16 3,298.80 31.940.00 28,643.20 10.32%
Refunds & Reimbursements 12,437.25 32,602.16 4,05000 (28,552.16) 804.99%
Transfers In 69,941.70 74,809.70 000 (74,809.70) 0.00%
Fund Balance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%
Total Revenues 155,091.05 1,274,894.08 1,797,613.00 522,718.92 70.92%
Expenditures:
Current
General Government
Mayor and Council 1,264.89 11,579.51 16,53000 4,950.49 70.05%
ElecIions 0.00 1,506.98 3,085.00 1,578.02 48.85%
Planning & Zoning 428.01 3,706.01 6,780.00 3,073.99 54.66%
Economic Development 0.00 3,493.59 6,280.00 2,786.41 55.63%
Administration 21,756.20 255,880.42 302,830.00 46.949.58 84.50%
Financial Administration 0.00 19,326.80 15,000.00 (4,326.80) 128.85%
Assessing 0.00 14,974.00 17,50000 2,526.00 85.57%
Legal 4,630.06 60,032.20 62,00000 1,987.80 96.83%
Engineertng Services 1,377.85 6,831.91 14,250 00 7,418.09 47.94%
Insurance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%
City Hall 1,365.09 18,370.19 28,100.00 9,729.81 65.37%
Total General Government 30,822.10 395,701.61 472,355.00 76,853.39 83.77%
Public Safety
Police Protection 35,510.56 355,393.60 .1'30,000.00 74,606.40 n..... ","""rof
'_lC....V-J/U
Fire Protection 31,016.50 102,566.00 76,000.00 (26,566.00) 134.96%
Building Inspection 8,656.83 73,792.79 97,12809 23,335.30 75.97%
Electrtcallnspection 3,553.87 9,877.55 4,00000 (5,877.55) 246.94%
Civil Defense 0.00 805.47 1,30000 494.53 61.96%
Animal Control 0.00 783.29 350.00 (433.29) 223.80%
Total Public Safe\y 78,737.76 543,218.70 608,778.09 65,559.39 89.23%
Public Works
Public Works 6,915.91 105,641.23 220,84146 115,200.23 47.84%
Streets 72.16 47,340.18 55,000.00 7,659.82 86.07%
Street Lighting 1,981.49 17,418.10 32,000.00 14.581.90 5443%
Total Public Works 8,989.58 170,399.51 307,841.46 137,441.95 55.35%
111812002
9:09 AM
budget report
MTD YTD Budget Variance % of Budget
10/31/02 2002 2002 +(-) Used
Culture and Recreation
ParklRec. Committee 0.00 858.43 1,780.00 921.57 48.23%
ParklRec. Programs 0.00 3,273.64 41,523.82 38,250.18 7.88%
Park Maintenance 4,866.90 43,673.27 74,551.47 30,878.20 58.58%
Total Culture and Recreation 4,866.80 47,805.34 117,855.29 70,049.115 40.56%
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00%
City Festival 0.00 10,044.63 10,00000 (44.63) 100.45%
Total Miscellaneous 0.00 10,044.63 10,000.00 (44.63) 100.45%
Total Current Expenditures 123,396.32 1,167,169.79 1,516,829.84 349,660.05 76.95%
Capital Outlay
General Government 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00%
Public Safety 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%
Streets and Highways 0.00 0.00 121,50000 121,500.00 0.00%
Culture and Recreation 0.00 0.00 23,500.00 23,500.00 0.00%
Total Capital Outlay 0.00 0.00 155,000.00 155,000.00 0.00%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 123,398.32 1,167,189.79 1,671,829.84 504,660.05 69.81%
EXCESS (DEFICIT) OF REVENUES 31,894.73 107,724.29 125,783.16 18,058.87 85.64%
OVER EXPENDITURES
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Operating Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%
Operating Transfer Out (169,229.59) (350,889.54) (125,78316) 225,106.38 278.96%
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING (169,229.59) (350,869.54) (125,783.16) 225,106.38 278.96%
SOURCES (USES)
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF (137,534.88) (243,185.251 0.00 243,165.25
REVENUE AND OTHER FINANCING
SOURCES OVER EXPENDITURES
AND OTHER FINANCING USES
11/80002
9:09 AM
budget report
Water Fund
Monthly Financial Report
Month Ended October 31, 2002
MTD YTD Budget Variance % of Budget
10/30102 2002 2002 +(-) Used
Operating Revenue:
Charges for Services 39,599.20 152,436.41 000 (152,436.41 ) #DIV/O'
Total Opel'llling Revenue 39,599.20 152,438.41 0.00 (152,438.41) #DIV/O!
Operating Expenses:
Salartes and Benefils 3,838.46 30,151.89 0.00 (30,151.89) #DIV/O!
Supplies 2,087.87 23,278.11 0.00 (23,278.11 ) #DIV/O!
Other Services and Charges 311.41 16,149.30 0.00 (16,149.30) #DIV/OI
Utilities 143.14 2,311.67 000 (2,311.67) #DIV/O!
Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #DIVlO!
Total Operating Expenses 6,380.88 71,890.97 0.00 (71,890.97) #DIVlO!
OPERATING INCOME 33,218.32 80,545.44 0.00 (80,545.44) #DIV/O!
Nonoperating Revenue (Expense)
Interest on Investmenls 0.00 (6,814.00) 000 6,814.00 #DIV/O'
Special Assessmenls 265.02 52,168.92 0.00 (52,168.92) #DIV/O!
Hook up Fees and Un~ Charges 20,466.51 91,800.00 000 (91,800.00) #DIV/O'
Interest Expense 0.00 (12,435.56) 0.00 12,435.56 #DIV/O'
Refunds & ReimbursemenlB 245.29 499.98 000 (499.98) #DIV/O'
Total Nonoperating Revenue 20,976.82 125,219.34 0.00 (125,219.34) #D1V/O!
(Expense)
INCOME BEFORE OPERATING 54,195.14 205,764.78 0.00 (205,764.78) #D1V/O!
TRANSFERS
OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT (11,589.00) (182,408.91) 0.00 182,408.91 #OlVIO!
NET INCOME 42,628.14 23,355.87 0.00 (23,355.87) #D!\'!O!
CREDIT FOR DEPRECIATION ON 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #OIVIO!
CONTRIBUTED ASSETS
NET INCREASE IN RETAINED 42,626.14 23,355.87 0.00 (23,355.87) #DIV/OI
EARNINGS
111812002
10:11 AM
budget report water
L_ __
Sewer Fund
Monthly Financial Report
Month Ended October 31, 2002
-
MTD YTD Budget Variance % of Budget
10130102 2002 2002 +(-) Used
Operating Revenue:
Charges for Services 49,249.64 213,860.13 0.00 (213,860.13) #DIV /01
Total Operating Revenue 48,249.84 213,880.13 0.00 (213,860.13) #DlV/O!
Operating Expenses:
Satarles and Benefi\$ 2,652.57 24,360.49 000 (24,360.49) #DIV/O'
Supplies 324.23 4,425.90 000 (4,425.90) #DIV/O!
Other Services and Charges 809.04 34,549.62 0.00 (34,549.62) #DIV/O!
Utilities 95.57 1,102.98 0.00 (1,102.98) #DIV/O!
MCES Disposal Chargee 11,418.50 89,091.00
Depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #DIV/O!
Total Operating Expenses 15,298.91 153,529.99 0.00 (64,438.99) #DIV/C!
OPERATING INCOME 33,949.73 60,330.14 0.00 (149,421.141 #DIVIO!
Nonoperating Revenue IExpenee):
Interest on Investments 0.00 (10,076.00) 0.00 10,076.00 #DIV/O!
Special Assessments 255.02 63,638.20 0.00 (63,638.20) #DIV/O'
Hook up Fees and Una Charges 21,997.01 101,997.01 000 (101,997.01) #DIV/O!
Interest & Fiscal Chargee 0.00 (13,681.94) 0.00 13,681.94 #DIV/O'
Refunds & Reimbursements 0.00 6,176.00 0.00 (6,176.00) #DIV/O!
Total Nonoperating Revenue 22,262,03 148,053.27 0.00 1148,053.27) #DIV/O!
(Expense)
INCOME BEFORE OPERATING 56,211.78 208,383.41 0.00 (297,474.41) #DIVIO!
TRANSFERS
OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 0.00 1169,894.41) 0.00 189,894.41 #DIVIO!
NET INCOME 56,211.78 38,489.00 0.00 (38,489.00) #DIV/O!
CREDIT FOR DEPRECIATION ON 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #DIV/O!
CONTRIBUTED ASSETS
NET INCReASE IN RETAINED 56,211.78 38,489.00 0.00 -S38,489.oo) #DIV/O!
EARNINGS
111812002
10:20 AM
bUdget report sewer
l______
City of Centervi<<e
Narrative for Interim Financial Statements
Month Ended October 31, 2002
Attached are interim financial statements for the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds,
Debt Service Funds, Enterprise Funds and Capital Projects Funds for the City of
Centerville. These reports are intended to illustrate how city operations are progressing
financially during the year.
The interim financial statements are unaudited and may not reflect all financial
transactions that will be recorded for the year.
Note: I have not included reports for the debt service, capital projects and special
revenue funds at this time. I will include those reports in future statements.
Please take note of the following:
General Fund
Revenues:
1. Taxes
Property tax revenues are received from the county in June, November and
January. The January settlement is accrued back to the previous year. The first
property tax settlement was received in early July and is the only one reflected in
this statement.
2. IntergovernDlental
The Intergovernmental Revenue Account includes a grant received from the DNR
in the amount of $40,500 for an Acorn Creek Park project. The project was not in
the 2002 budget because it was a reimbursement prior year expenses. Police State
Aid in the amount of$21,922.30 was received in October. The amount budgeted
for police state aid was $15,000. One-half of the Local Government Aid, in the
amount of $4,657.50, and one-half of the PERA Aid, in the amount of $666.50,
was received in July. There was no budget for Local Government Aid, PERA
Aid, or Fire Aid. The amount of$9,342.84 was received from the Waste
Management Board in September for SCORE (recycling) reimbursement.
3. Charges for Services
The YTD amount includes transfers from capital project funds for street
maintenance and signage. There was no budget for these services for the year
2002. However, most ofthe money received was due in prior years.
4. Interest
Interest earnings are below budget and will most likely continue to be below
budget throughout the year. Interest shown in this account consists of checking
account interest only. Interest on investments is credited to a special interest fund
and, under current policy, is distributed at year-end.
L_______ ___
5. Miscellaneous
The amount of $3 I ,940 was budgeted in the Miscellaneous Revenues account,
consisting of operating transfers from Water and Sewer. Council later decided
not to transfer these funds. The Refunds and Reimbursements line item includes
donations from the Centennial Fire Relief Association in the amount of $26,500
that were not in the budget. The money came from gambling proceeds and was
passed on to the Centennial Fire Department.
Expenditures:
1. Financial Administration
The audit is for the year. The audit was over budget this year due to the extensive
amount of time spent on the 2001 audit, TlF problems, and deferred compensation
and wage issues.
2. Assessing
Payment was made to Anoka County in February for this year's assessing.
Assessment payments are substantially done for the year.
3. Fire Protection
Payments are made quarterly in the amount of$19,016.50 to Centennial Fire
Department. The amount shown includes payments for the entire year. It also
includes payments to the Centennial Fire Department in the amount of$26,500
from gambling proceeds ofthe Centennial Fire Relief Association.
4. Electrical Inspection
Due to the increase in development, electrical inspection will be over budget for
the year. Staffwill propose an increase in this line item for 2003.
5. Streets
Street work is done for the year.
6. Parks and Recreation
Money was budgeted for a park intern, but was never utilized.
7. Capital Outlay
Very little of the capital budget has been spent so far this year. As a result,
General Fund expenditures are below budget at this time.
8. Transfers Out
The amount shown represents the debt -related transfers made earlier this year
(city hall lease payment, etc.), residual equity transfers approved by council to
close out obsolete funds, and transfers made to close out capital projects funds.
The capital projects revenues are being pursued by the city attorney.
Enterprise Funds
1. Water and Sewer
No budget was set for the year 2002 for the enterprise funds. The interest on
investments account in both funds reflects a negative amount due to the fact that
reversing (accounting) entries were made at the beginning of the year and the
interest income has not yet been allocated from the interest account. This will be
done in December. Similarly, depreciation entries will be recorded at year-end.
Both funds show income before operating transfers. The operating transfers out
consist mainly of the utility oversizing transfers made to the capital projects
funds.
Prepared By:
Approved By:
Finance Director
Administrator
N arrative.doc
l _
.'
Population
Built Out
Square Miles
Residential Equivalency Unit (REU)
Water Meter
Storm Sewer
Watar Hook-up
Service Availability Charge (SAC)
Site Maintanance
Permit Fees
Plan Review
Surcharge
Other Charges
Escrow
Sewer & Water Hook-up (Inspection)
Sewer, Watar & Utility Permit
Excavation
Furnace/A.C./W.H. Permit
BUILDING PERMIT FEE REVIEW
CITY OF CENTERVlLLE
3,202
No
2.2 Approx.
2,000.00
290.00
200.00
1,500.00
1,200.00
225.00
1997 UBC Schedule + 25%
65% of permit fee set by UBC for commercial
carried over to residential
State Mandated
Value Permit Fee
400,000.00 11,130.04
It should be noted that Cities were surveyed as to their fees charged for new, residential
building permits only. Some other communities have special assessments automatically
associated with each development for sealcoating, waterlsewer, etc. that are above and
beyond the permit fees.
CITY OF FOREST LAKE
6,798
No
I
N/A
251.00 + Tex
N/A
875.00
1,400.00
N/A
1997 UBC Schedule
UBC%
State Mandated
2,500.00 Silt Fence for
1 st five homes in plat
50.00 for 1 or both
. '-' Vt.t~
- \'11~':.1 v
.K \-0'<' ~V-~, V kLV'" .. "
']A' rJ....)J~ './C rv-v"""~
""+ r
I '<.1-<<- v~ ...'
(, ~ ,( d- ():."7
n.~i......\.Lc-t
.....
CITY OF HUGO
6,363
No
7
(REC) 2,000
275.00
N/A
2,000.00 ~'
2,000.00 J /1! (,tf. 0'
N/A fJ'- ,'I'f JP .
1994 UBe Schedule.....),~ J.~ ~,~ t .
UBe % f. ~,>{j.C ~ .~-+
.~,~u \?( {j
State Mandated I ,&1.)./1'0
25.00
Value Permit Fee
400,000.00 9,613.96
.
Population
Built Out
Square Miles '1
Residential Equivalency Unit (REU)
Water Meter
Stonn Sewer
Water Hook-up
Service Availability Charge (SAC)
Site Maintenance
Pennit Fees
Plan Review
Surcharge
Other Charges
Escrow
Sewer & Water Hook-up (Inspection)
Sewer, Water & Utility Pennit
Excavation
Furnace/A.C.IW.H. Pennit
CITY OF UNO LAKES
16,791
No
N/A
272.00 + Tax
100.00
125.00
1,200.00
N/A
1997 USC Schedule
65% of permit fee set by USC
State Mandated
CITY OF OSSEO
2,434
..{f"(Not Issuing S-F Dwelling Permits)
YeS- Land Locked
1 approx.----
475.00 Sewer Connection
210.10
N/A
1,260.00
1,200.00
NlA
1997 UBC Schedule
Hired Out (Midwest)
State Mandated
$500.00 Sod, Utility Billing, Curb & Gutter
35.00
100 + 10,000 Bond
/) .,) ,tI
tUi' r~lVv'-./
Value Permit Fee kt'5 ' tl t,.
400,000.00 ~2~~~UJ ~r'- vHf t s.uz-
~ VJLl- i#\~J-crvJ
It should be noted that Cities were sUlVeyed as to their fees chargedvfor new, residential
building permits only. Some other communities have special assessments automatically
associated with each development for sealcoating, water/sewer, etc. that are above and
beyond the permit fees. (L.~ u,~)
.......
CITY OF SPRING LAKE PARK
, /p1-J-
&,772 2002 v'Vl'" if
1 0 New Homes rJ-'-1r'^'v
Almost 60 New Townhomes
2.25 approx.
N/A
235.15
N/A
500.00
1,200.00
N/A
1997 UBC Schedule
State Mandated
145.00
105.00
45.00
Value Permit Fee
400,000.00 7,986.00
-...........
City of Centervil/e Charges and Breakdown of Dollars
Residential Equivalency Unit (REU)
Water Meter
Storm Sewer
Water Hook-up
SAC
Site Maintenance
Trunk Fees, Cover Costs for Oversizing & Lift Stations
Cost
Surface Water Treatment
Wells, Water Towers, Looping, Hydrants & Fire Protection
Met. Council ~~<,-kJ!
Escrow ($200) + $25 Administrative Fee