HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-09-07 P & Z
.,
APPROVED
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
Pursuant to due call and notice thereot: the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of
Centerville held its regularly scheduled meeting at City Hall, 1880 Main Street.
PRESENT: Commission member Brian Hanson
Commission member AI LaMotte
Commission member Ray DeVine
Commission member Rob Sheppard
Commission member David Kilian
Commission member John McLean
ABSENT: Kathy Welk
STAFF: City Administrator, Jim March
StafFLiaison, Aimee Fairbrother
Council Liaison Linda Brousarrd Vickers
CALL TO ORDER
Mr. LaMotte called the meeting to order at 6:40 p.m.
OPENING
The oath of office was administered by Mr. March, to the following new members of the Planning
and Zoning Commission: Ray DeVme, David Kilian, John McLean and Rob Sheppard.
PUBLIC HEARING(S)
APPEARANCES
NEW BUSINESS
Animal Ordinance Review
The Commission reviewed the Animal Ordinance, incorporating changes agreed upon by the
Page 1 of 3
Commission. Refer to Revised Animal Ordinance for specific additions and changes.
Motion by Mr. Hanson. seconded by l.\{r. ~heppard to make the noted changes to the
Animal Ordinance as a recommendation to City CounciL providing changes are reviewed
and approved by the City Attorney. and the Chief ofPoUce. AD in favor. Motion carried
IInanimously.
Firearm Ordinance Review
The Commission discussed briefly sections of the current Firearm Ordinance, resulting in tabling
the agenda item, and requesting copies of neighboring Cities Firearm Ordinances for further
review at the October Planning and Zoning meeting.
Motion by Mr. Hanson seconded by Mr. Kilian to table the Firearm Ordinance. AD in
f,vor. Motion carried IInanimously.
Ordinance # 4 Review
Mr. March updated the Commission on research previously conducted this year in reference to
Ordinance #4. Mr. March indicated Dean Johnson from Resource Strategies had been working
with the Commission on Ordinance #4, specifically dealing with, but not limited to the following
issues:
~ Driveway Width
~ Lot sizes and zoning criteria
~ Set backs in the downtown area
~ Detached garages
Mr. March informed the Commission that there are property owners that are waiting to hear how
this Ordinance will be revised, so they can find out how large of a detached garage or outbuilding
they can build. Mr. March stated the City attorney did not advise the Commission to approve
variances on these properties. It was recommended the new Commission members review the
proposed Ordinance #4 provided by Mr. Johnson. The Commission tabled the discussion upon
further review of the proposed Ordinance.
Motion by Mr. Hanmn. seconded by Mr. Kilian to table Ordinance #4 discussion. AD in
favor. Motion carried UDanimously.
Eibensteiner Buildin~
Keith Eibensteiner of Royal Oaks Realty presented a proposed building plan for the middle lot
located in the Royal Industrial Park. Mr. EtOensteiner indicated Royal Oaks Realty has developed
five lots on a cul-de-sac in the Industrial Park, and stated the company's intention is to develop a
tenant leased business complex incorporating the same theme within the business park. The initial
Page 2 of 3
...
building being proposed is 11,800 square feet, and exceeds the minimum lot and building size per
City Ordinance. Although the two to four available spots have not yet been leased, the proposed
building will be able to accommodate businesses on the first and second floor of the building. The
proposed building has four overhead drive in doors with a double loading dock that could be split
into four separate bays. The proposed site also included twelve parking stalls in the front of the
building, along with a row of parking on the side of the building. A question on the state required
handicap stalls was addressed, and noted as a contingency on the site.
Mr. March explained that normally in the past, the Planning and Zoning Commission would
discuss the impact of the building on the City, including the effect on the tax base. Mr. March
indicated that prior to his administration, the City had a checklist incorporating different
requirements that needed to be addressed and met by the developer before acceptance of the plan.
Mr. March indicated a revised checklist is currently being drafted, and named protection for City
Staff as well as the Developer as a major benefit of the checklist procedure.
Council member Vickers added the job of the Planning and Zoning Commission at this point
would be to determine if the building type and style was appropriate for the City, and if the
building meets the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance. The Commission should then
make a motion to City Council with their recommendation based on discussed contingencies.
Motion by Mr. Hanson. seconded by Mr. DeVine to ftCommend City Council approve the
Eibensteiner building plans contingent on the review and ap>>roval of the City Attorney.
City Engjneer and Chief of ponce. along with providine evidence that drain8le and ADA
requirements have been met. AD in favor. Motion carried.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
August 7, 1999 Planning and Zoning Minutes
Motion by Mr. DeVine. seconded by Mr. Kilian to approve the August 3. 1999 Planning
and Zonine meeting minutes. AD in favor. Motion carried
ADJOURN
Motion by Mr. LaM~tte seconded by Mr. Hanson to adjourn the Aupst 3. 1999 Planning
and Zoning meeting at 7:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Page 3 of 3