The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1999-02-02 P & Z ~.", .J'. . CITY OF CENTERVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 2,1999 Pursuant to due call and notice thereot: the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Centerville held its regularly scheduled meeting on February 2, 1999, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Chairwoman Kathy Welk Commission Members: John Buckbee AI LaMotte Brian Hanson ABSENT: Linda Broussard Vickers STAFF: Ry-Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk Paul Patzer, Building Official/Public Works Director ****************************************************************************** ROLL CALL Chair Welk called the February 2. 1999 Planning and Zoning Meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. PUBLIC BEARING (S) Rezone Request - Gerald Rehbein Mr. Gerald Rehbein (R&R Leasing) gave an overview of a request to rezone 10 acres known as 7305 20th Avenue and 7353 20th Avenue from R5 to PUD (planned Unit Development) - R2. Mr. Rehbein mentioned that the proposed town home ratio is 3-to-l (three units per acre). Moreover, the PUD assists in preserving the unique features of the property, such as the wetlands. The City ofLino Lakes zoning ordinance states, the area east of 20th Avenue is scheduled for high density development. Furthermore, the PUD permits fifteen structures on 10 acres. Whereas, the R2 district regulations permit 29 structures on 10 acres and the R5 district regulations permit 25 structures. Mr. Rehbein commented senior citizens are demanding maintenance free, one-level town homes such as in the proposal. The proposed town home development will be an increase to'the tax base compared to an R5 subdivision. In short, the proposed town home development would accommodate senior citizens and will be a sound tax base for the city. Mr. Rod Henslin (1967 73rd Street) distributed a packet of information and a petition signed by eight (8) property owners that request the Commission deny the rezone request for various reasons (see attached). Mr. Henslin touched upon each exhibit in the information packet. Ms. Maria Haugen (1994 73rd Avenue) stressed concern that the city needed to address safety 1 issues pertaining to traffic access from 20th Avenue into the development, since traffic flows at 55 mph. Ms. Gail Nadon (1984 73rd Avenue) noted concern that there is no designated park area and with the growth of the area there is no other access to play ground areas except via 20th Avenue. Ms. Jennifer Steward (1995 73rd Avenue) suggested a berm or trees be incorporated to buffer the R2 development from the town home development. Mr. Patterson questioned what trees would be saved or planted and what would happen to the drainage. Mr. Rehbein didn't plan to remove the trees on the property line and ultimately would not hinder the drainage. Ms. Steward felt that Mr. Rehbein's development should comply with the same 35' rear year setback requirement as the R2 district. Mr. Palzer explained with a PUD the developer works with the City on special issues including the setback requirements and wetlands. Mr. Dale Runkle (Bright Keys) explained that the proposed twin homes are single level units, that range 1220 sq. ft. to 1300 sq. ft. without the garage. The Bright Key development plans to price each unit around $130,000. Ms. Denise Saxton (1949 73rd Street) voiced a concern about mitigating the drainage from the existing development. Mr. Patterson questioned Staff if there is a street light maximum. Mr. Palzer replied that street lights are spaced every three houses. However, the City pays for street lights and is considering eliminating some street lights. Mr. Buckbee questioned why is the width of the proposed streets are thinner than normal and why are there fewer setback requirements than in the R2 district. Mr. Rehbein commented that the streets are the same width as in the Willow Glen development and the setbacks are negotiable within a PUD. The PUD preserves the natural setting within a development. Thus, some of the setbacks are less than the R2 requirements. Chair Welk replied that the City resexves the right to request park dedication funds or park land. Also, the PUD is designed to embrace the natural settings of the parcel. Chair Welk read aloud Ordinance #4 51.01 PURPOSE. To encourage a more creative and efficient development ofland and its improvements through the presexvation of more restrictive application of zoning requirements such as lot sizes. height and building setbacks. while at the same time. meetings the standards and puz:poses of the comprehensive plan and preserving the health. safety and welfare of the citizens of the City. 2 "\ . ~.. I! '1''1( ." .. Mr. Buckbee moved to close the public hearing. Mr. LaMotte seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Variance Request - Matt Vesel - Table Mr. Buckbee moved to table Mr. Vesel variance request until the March Meeting. Mr. Hanson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. APPEARANCES l\'Iari Nelson - Planning and Zoning Liaison Ms. Gaustad introduced Councilmember Marl Nelson as the Planning and Zonings Council Liaison. Chair Welk and the Commission welcomed Councilmember Nelson. Future Variance Request - Paul Wolf (6933 Sumac Court) Ms. Gaustad introduced Mr. Paul Wolf who was present to receive the Commission's guidance on pursuing the construction of an accessory building on his comer lot. Mr. Patzer explained that according to Ordinance 4 (34.05-02 and (34.06-1), the ordinance allows accessory buildings to be construction in a ~ yard. However, an exception to the ordinance is a comer lot, which has no rear yard (two front yards and two side years). In addition, Mr. Hoeft recommended the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing for a variance request at no charge to the citizen. ACTION ITEMS Ms. Gaustad reported that Mr. Dean Johnson hoped to address the Commission prior to the March 2, meeting to give an update on proposed Ordinance #4 and Ordinance #8. Furthermore, !vIr. Johnson requested to meet at a6:00 p.m. workshop. Mr. Buckbee moved to set the workshop for March 2. 1999 at 6:00 p.m. Mr. Hanson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. DISCUSSION ITEMS Town home Sketch Plan - Gerald Rehbein Chair Welk concured with Mr. Buckbee's desire to maintain the R5 minimal lot size of 17,500 sq. ft. Mr. Buckbee added although the wetlands are an issue, the R5 lends to the area and 'i~k~ping with the Comprehensive Plan. \', ') '.', . .' ~~.... :. "':'-~: Mr. LaMotte explained that the town home concept is selling well and Cente~e :seriiQrs 3fe = ;.: . looking for this living option. Moreover, the PUD is fine but if the density wasA'~re~d slightltk/ it may be more marketable. Mr. Buckbee commented the density is too high. lVI,t.~an:son' -';' . commented granting variances for the small rear yards or a short driveway may pies~pduture ...... ,. ~ f.'" ~ r;~ "~~ ~ \I '!\ ~ 3 problems. Basically, too many units in too small an area. Mr. Buckbee moved to recommend to the Council not to approve the proposed rezone request from R5 to R2 PUD. Mr. Hanson seconded the motion. Buckbee - Ffan~on - Welk - aye, LaMotte nay. Motion carried. Consider Amendment to Ordinance #5 Discharge of Firearms - Tabled March Agenda Items Ms. Gaustad gave a recap of March Agenda Items 6:00 p.m. Workshop Paul Wolf - Variance Goetz Landscape - Variance Matt Vesel - Variance CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES August 4, 1998 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes October 6, 1998 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes January 5, 1998 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes Mr. Buckbee moved to table the Planning and Zoning Minutes. Mr. Hanson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Councilmember Nelson asked the Commission members what their recommended intentions were regarding Goetz Landscapes Special Use Permit (SUP) request. The Commission conveyed, its intension was to clean up the loose ends and then forward the SUP request to the Council. Councilmember Nelson expressed her appreciation for each member's dedication to the City and noted that the Council addressed and approved Goetz Landscapes SUP. ADJOURN Mr. Buckbee moved to adjourn the Februmy 2. 1999 Planning and Zoning meeting at 8:50 p.m.. Mr. LaMotte seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully Submitted, r~ ~ ~.. Ry-Chel Gaustad~ ;CMC City Clerk 4 ..., .. .....,.. f