Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-10-06 P & Z ...~. ... CITY OF CENTERVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 6, 1998 Pursuant to due call and notice thereot: the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Centerville held its regularly scheduled meeting on October 6, 1998, at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. .. PRESENT: Chairperson Kathy Welk Commission Members: John Buckbee AI LaMotte Brian Hanson ABSENT: Linda Broussard-Vickers STAFF: fun March, City Administrator Ry-Chel Gaustad, City Clerk ************************************************************************ ROLL CALL OATH OF OFFICE Ms. Gaustad administered the oath of office to Brian :Hanson, then he joined the Commission. PUBLIC HEARING (S) Center Villa Preliminary Plat Consideration (6995 - 20th Ave.) Mr. Willie Lessard (6995 - 20th Ave.) addressed the Commission and gave a brief overview of the proposed Center Villa residential subdivision. Mr. Lessard commented that both the Engineer's and Building Official's noted concerns are addressed (See attached). Mr. Lessard identified the R2 required 100 ft. minimum lot width at the set back, and requested a variance on Block 2, Lots 2,3,4, 5, 9, 10, 11 and 14 because the lot width slightly varies. Mr. Buckbee commented on the generosity of the lot sizes in the R2 district. The Commission discussed R2 district requirements, the minimal width (100 ft.) and the subdivision design. 1-'Ir. March noted that cul-de-sac lot widths that abut the street can be ... any size or width; however, at the building site the lot width must be 100 ft. Therefore, butt lots 5 and 20 need a variance. Mr. Lesssard commented both Clearwater Meadows and Center Oaks IT (R2 districts) have cul-de-sacs that are less than 100 ft. at the building site. Mr. Lessard did not foresee a benefit to the development in looping the watermain. Therefore, Mr. Lessard requested the additional watermain materials and cost be addressed in the Development Contract, and that the City pay for the upgrade in pipe forthe additional watermain footage. Mr. Lessard addressed the sidewa:lk plans and. noted a few trees may need to be removed. A resident from 7017 Brian Drive questioned why the trees need to be removed to put in a sidewalk. The resident suggested the sidewalk encircle the tree, thus saving the tree. Mr. March commented the trees may not need to be removed. Mr. Lessard said he is willing to work with the property. owner in regards to the design of the sidewalk. I) Mr. Lessard stated the construction traffic will access the site from 20th Avenue, not Brian Drive: Also, he addressed comments expressing concern pertaining to the 10% slope for the driveway at Lot 12, Block 2. Mr. March saidqthe size of outlot A may need to be reconsidered if the existing Lake Area Utility property does not provide an additional buildable site outside of the flood plain area. Motion by Mr Buckbee to close the Public Hearing Seconded by Mr. LaMotte All in iaYm:.. Varlance - Re~Dnstruction of a Shed at 1563 Peltier Lake Drive for Phippen. NIT LaMotte moved to take the Phippen request for the reconstruction of a shed from the table Kathy Welk seconded the motion. All in favor NIT. March reiterated the variance request and highlighted on Ordinance 65. (STANDARDS. 65. 03-1; 65.03-2; 65.03-3; 65.03-4.) Mr. Buckbee stated that adjacent property owners have voiced opposition in regards to voting in favor of issuing the variance. Motion by Mr Lai\1otte, to close the Public Hearing Seconded by Mr Buckbee. All in fuYQL. CONSIDERATION OF l\HNUTES May 5. 1998 Planning and Zoning Meeting :Minutes Tabled .June 2. 1998 Planning and Zoning :Meeting Minutes 2 .. I Tabled August 4, 1998 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes Tabled S~temberl, 1998 PlanningBJId' Zoning Meeting Minutes Tabled APPEARANCES Joe Goetz - Goetz Landscape & Irrigation; Inc~ - Sketch Plan Mr. Joe Goetz and Mr. Kelly Johnson were present to discuss their site plan, landscape and building design. Mr. March'suggested the business owners address the construction phases and time frame for development in the Special Use Permit. Mr. Buckbee questioned if the green house materials are permissible in the'Industrial District and the designs of buildings: Mr. Goetz stated the green houses are 18 ft. in height and suggested submitting a material list. Mr. Buckbee was concemedabout the- accessory buildings material since it is- not' what is required in the Industrial District. Ms. Welk questioned if the City will allow the construction' of a building that is- underthe 5000 sq: ft: minimum requirement in the Industrial District. Mr. March noted a Special Use Permit will address the building construction during its phases and the permissible construction materials. Mr. Lessard explained the site plan may be more of a mixeduse concept than Industrial. Ms. Gaustad' commented that'the outside storage' will' need to be addressed if the' variance is granted. Mr. Goetz mentioned that they would like to get electric, sewer and utilities to the property in order to protect the equipment that is located on the property. Ms. Johnson explained they would like to build by next fall, and in the interim operate business from a modular office building. Mr: March noted the ordinance' doesn't say you cannot use a modular office building. Mr. Buckbee recommended' that Mr. Goetz take the Planning and Zonings' comments and continue to work with staff and the engineering team, then pursue a public hearing in November. ACTION ITEMS " ' , ',' ',: ,;' \' ",' '. \1 I . . , \,' . Action on Preliminary Plat for Center'Villa " , , , Mr. Buckbee recapped the need to set building sites back five (5) feet' and to~cohsicJ;er the' City cost to upgrade the watermain. Mr. Buckbee favored a variance request and Park and Recreations' recommendation of a sidewalk in the development. ",-0';" . ';, :2 :;;"J'\I 3 \; Motion by Mr. Buckbee to urge Council to give consideration to the development, and granting approval of the plan presented with specific variances for lot widths'ofBlock 2. Lots 2,3,4.5,9, 10, 11 and 14 because of the generosity of the lot sizes in the R2 district Seconded b.y Mr Han!Kln. All in favor. Action on Variance to ReeonstnJet a Shed. The Commission briefly discussed the situation with the shed reconstruction and its location near the lake. The Commission discussed the proposed shorelandordinance and the current building regulations near the lake. Motion by Ms Welk to recommend'to the Council that the variance to reconstruct the shed be granted contingent upon the shed heing reconstructed to the !tame dimensions of the cement ~lah Seconded by Mr Buckbee Allin favor DISCUSSION ITEMS Reschedule November 3 Planning and'Zonlng'Meeting The Commission elected to reschedule the November 3, 1998 meeting to November 10, 1998. Consider Amendment to Ordinance'#4- OutboDdingll- Saxton - Tal)le Consider Amendment to Ordinance #5 - Disch8(ge of Firearms - Table Consider Amendment to Ordinance #49 The Commission discussed the construction industry working schedule and the weather elements'that dictate construction: Therefore;' the'Commission recommended'leaving the noise ordinance as stated. NOVEMBER AGENDA fl'EMS ADJOURN Motion by Mr. Buckbee to adjourn the October 6, Planning and Zoning Meeting Seconded by Mr LaMotte All in favor Meeting adjourned at 9:58 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, ft11 B~ Ry-Chel Gaustad, ,CMC/MCMC City Clerk 4