HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-05-27 CC Packet Add.'l Handouts
~
CITY OF CENTERVILLE Preliminary Estimate
General Fund Budget 5/18/2009
Actual Actual(Unaudited Adopted Percent Change Projected Percent Change
2007 2008 2009 Budget 2008 to 2009 2010 Budget 2009 to 2010
1.01
Revenues:
Property Taxes 1,813,923 '1 1,908,635 '1 1,660,920 Gen fd only -12.98% 1,677,529 1.00% 8t3
2008 LGAlMHVCA Loss Allowed as additional levy over levy limit 43,427.00 '11
Other Taxes & Assessments 1,724.00 1,915.00 20,000.00 (20,000) 944.39% 10,000.00 -50.00%
Licenses & Permits 220,855.00 319,724.00 180,000.00 ????? -43.70% 90,000.00 -50.00%
Bui/ding Inspection 199,048.00 298,724.00 145,000.00 -51.46% 70,000.00 -51.72%
Fines & Forfeits 37,529.00 29,797.00 33,500.00 12.43% 33,500.00 0.00%
Intergovernmental 286,590.00 218,672.00 166,500.00 -23.86% 166,500.00 0.00%
Rre Relief Aid 137,100.00 119,664.00 125,000.00 4.46% 125,000.00 0.00%
Charges for Services 2,228.00 15,183.00 2,000.00 -86.83% 2,000.00 0.00%
Interest Earnings 60,501.00 47,037.00 40,000.00 -14.96% 40,000.00 0.00%
Miscellaneous Revenues 2,752.00 1,699.00 15,000.00 782.87% 15,000.00 0.00%
Refunds & Reimbursements 43,659.00 13,001.00 4,000.00 -69.23% 4,000.00 0.00%
Other Financing Sources 99,500.00 99,500.00 0.00%
Subtotal non-Ievv revenue 655,838.00 647,028.00 560,500.00 460,500.00
Total Revenues 2,469,761.00 2,555,663.00 2,221,420.00 (20,000) -13.08% 2,181,456.20 -1.80%
Expenditures:
Current
General Government
Mayor and Council 32,043.00 31,168.00 35,000.00 12.29% 35,000.00 0.00%
Ejections 7,249.00 0.00% 8,000.00 #DIVlO!
Planning & Zoning 19,166.00 8,642.00 7,500.00 -13.21% 2,000.00 -73.33%
Administration 356,098.00 362,981.00 IT] 422,760.00 (22,000) 16.47% 415,000.00 -1.84%
Financial Administration 14,546.00 12,475.00 15,000.00 20.24% 16.000.00 6.67%
Assessing 18,165.00 15,166.00 17.000.00 12.09% 17,500.00 2.94%
Legal 101,142.00 73,346.00 75,000.00 2.26% 75,000.00 0.00%
City Hall 25,149.00 20,034.00 40,000.00 99.66% 38,000.00 -5.00%
Total General Government 566,309.00 531,061.00 612,260.00 15.29% 606,500.00 -0.94%
Public Safety
Police Protection 649,744.00 711,078.00 I:!l 751,032.00 (36,984) 5.62% 720,000.00 -4.13%
Fire Protection 236,050.00 226,174.00 237,000.00 4.79% 246,500.00 4.01%
Building Inspection 144,480.00 136.281.00 m 168,075.00 (40,000) 23.33% 120.000.00 -28.60%
Electrical Inspection 6,541.00 16,274.00 7,000.00 -56.99% 4,000.00 -42.86%
Civil Defense 892.00 1,109.00 1,500.00 35.26% 1,500.00 0.00%
Animal Control 928.00 1,245.00 1,500.00 20.48% 1,500.00 0.00%
Other Protective Services 924.00 2,100.00 600.00 0.00% 600.00 0.00%
Total Public Safety 1,039,559.00 1,094,261.00 1,166,707.00 6.62% 1,094,100.00 -6.22%
~
%S\:"S 00'S99'''~&'1: %\79'''~- ("s6'sul 00'OI:"'96~'1: OO'O~O'OLS'I: 00'&" L' ~0\7'1: S3HnolION3dX31YolOol
%OO'OOL 00'OOO'9~1: %1:1:'''6- OO'OOO'LI: OO'O"O'L9\>' OO'&S~'I:L& ,(ellno IRl!deO IRlOol
%00'0 OO'OOO'SZ ~ OO'OOO'SZ OO'~H'S(; 00'0 uOlleaJ:>aH pue aJn~no
OO'OOO'O~ S. %OO'OO~- 00'9~z'av OO'&S~'ZL& S,(eM46!H pue SlaaJIS
OO'OOO'&H 6UIleoo leas laaJIS
00'0 Alales :>!Iqnd
%00'00& OO'OOO'S lliJ %I>\I'ZS- OO'OOO'Z 00'&S9'~~ 00'0 luawwaAO~ leJaua~
,(ellno IRl!deo
%9(;'&- 00'S99'S60'I: %9V& 00'01:"'69 ~ 'z 00'OL6'1:0~'1: 00'065'61:0'1: saJnllPuadx3 lUaJJno IRlOol
%OS'Z~- 00'000' ~I: 'MO'&I: 00'000'''1: 00'US'6~ 00'SSS'61: snoauella:>s!1N IRlool
%OS'Z~- 00'000' ~Z % ~O'&Z OO'OOO'"Z [];I 00' ~ ~S'S ~ OO'SSS'SZ leAIlsa::l J8WWns Allo
pale:>olleUn
%00'0 OO'OOO',,~ %&S'O ~- 00'000'" ~ OO'~OL'S~ 00'1:&9'SI: lU8wdolaAao :>lwouo:>3 lelool
%00'0 OO'OOO'Z~ OO'OOO'Z~ 00'OL9'U luawaleqy xeol
iO/AIO# 00'0 sJaujJed illunoo e~ou'o'
%00'0 OO'OOO'Z %,,&.SOZ OO'OOO'Z 00'SS9 00'0 snoauella:>slll\l - '0'03
%00'0 00'9L&'Z . UOIIOWOJd ssauIsna - V03
00'0 AJopaJIO ssauIsna
s:>el sao ala::l uazoJ::I
%00'0 OO'OOO'V~ %&S'O~- 00'000'1> ~ 00' ~OL'S~ 00'Z&9'SZ V03 - luawdolaAao :>IWOUO:>3
lU8wdolaAao :>!wouo:>3
%VV'Z 00'S90'SS % ~S'&- OO'S&O'&S 00'&SO'9S 00'6~9'''S uOlleaJ:>aH pue aJnllno lelOol
%SS'Z 00'S9S'ZL %O~'O (OOO'H) OO'S&S'OL [:&I OO'&WOL 00' ~09'ZL a:>ueualulell\l ~Jed
%00'0 OO'OOS'S %SO'OI>- OO'OOS'S OO'SS~'v~ OO'v(;V'O~ sweJ60Jd ':>aH~Jed
%00'0 OO'OOO'V %~&'SS~ OO'OOO'V OO'ZOv' ~ OO'vas' ~ aalllwwoo ':>aH~Jed
uO!leaJ:>aH pue aJnllno
%S~'& OO'OOO'SLI: %0"'1>1:- 00'SW691: 00'&S&'9S& 00'9SS'OSI: sljJOM :>!Iqnd lelool
%~L'S OO'OOO'L& %ZV'S ~ OO'OOO'S& OO'SO&'SZ 00'0 6U1146!1laaJIS
%vS'v OO'OOS'Zv %9&'SS- OO'OOS'Ov OO'SSZ'LS OO'LSO'LO~ S18aJlS
%00'0 00'OOS'9 %SS' ~S- 00'OOS'9 00'9~v'&~ OO'SOL'OZ 6uIP,(:>aH
%00'0 OO'OOO'U %OL"9&- OO'OOO'U OO'LSS'S~ 00' ~ I>S'&Z sa:JIAJas 6UIJaaUl6u3
%~9'Z OO'OOO'OS ~ '109~'~~- OO'SWSH OO'&WLS~ OO'OSS'SU S~JOM :>!Iqnd
SljJoM :>!Iqnd
o ~Ol: Ol 6001: la6pna 0 ~Ol: 6001: Ol SOOI: 18llpna 6001: SOOI: LOOI:
a6ue40 lU8:lJad pal:>afoJd a6ue40 lUa:lJad p81doPV pallpneUn)lenl:>V lenl:>V
SOOZ/S ~/S la6pna pUn::lleJauae>
alewIls3 AJeuIWllaJd 3111AH3olN30 ::10 illO
CITY OF CENTERVILLE Preliminary Estimate
General Fund Budget 5/18/2009
Actual Actual(Unaudlted Adopted Percent Change Projected Percent Change
2007 2008 2009 Budget 2008 to 2009 2010 Budget 2009 to 2010
EXCESS (DEFICIT) OF REVENUES 68,018.00 (14,347.00) 25,000.00 (133,208.80) -632.84%
OVER EXPENDITURES
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Operating Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.00
Operating Transfer Out 205,800.00 204,458.00
(9,611.00) (35,977.00)
Street Reconstruction Reserve 25,000.00 (25,000.00) 25,000.00 0.00%
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING 205,800.00 204,458.00 25,000.00 -87.77% 25,000.00 0.00%
Uses (Sources)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER l 2,607,543.00 2,774,468.00 2,221,420.00 -19.93% 2,339,666.00 5.32%
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF (137,782.00) (218,805.00) 0.00 (158,208.80) 8B
REVENUE AND OTHER FINANCING "14
SOURCES OVER EXPENDITURES
AND OTHER FINANCING USES
Debt Service:
GO Assessment 2000 400.00 400.00 0.00
GO Improvement 2004B 102,000.00 102,000.00 102,000.00 130,000.00 27.45%
Joint Police Station Lease 78,400.00 77,200.00 77,400.00 77,400.00 0.00%
Hidden Spring Park Loan 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00
GO Improvement 2007 A 178,500.00 190,000.00 6.44%
2009 Improvement Bds 260,000.00
Total Debt Service 205,800.00 204,600.00 382,900.00 682,400.00 78.22%
Total Levy 1,857,582.00 2,113,235.00 2,043,820.00 2,359,929.20 15.47%
"1 Includes bond levy. Listed separately for 2009-2010
"2 Travel and conf. curtailed, payroll savings from vacancy of finance director.
Savings may be larger if rehire is at lower rate. Position to fill about June 1.
"3 Reduction in police budget of 5%.
"4 These costs will shift to 2009 Improvement for this year.
"5 Reduction in cost resulting from rebidding lawn mowing.
"6 Budget is $21,000 plus pass-through of $3000 of gambling revenue.
This revenue is unlikely.
"7 Server upgrades
"8 Truck replacement
"9 Local costs toward match of enhancement grant.
"10 Maximum levy estimated. Actual levy limit may include adjustments for growth in households
"11 Additional allowed levy over limit to make up for 2008 unallotment of aids.
"12 No adjustment yet taken for delayed payment or delinquent taxes.
Delinquency in 2008 is about 4%. To allow for this budget should be reduced by about $70,000
"13 Minimum budget cuts required to balance.
"14 A revenue loss of $60,000 through unallotment is likely, whether we can increase the levy
to compensate, is unknown at this time.
I .
'.
2335 Highway 36 W
5t. Paul. MN 55113
Tel 651-636-4600
Fax 651-636-1311
www.bonestroo.com
May 27, 2009
#' Bonestroo
Mr. Dallas Larson
City Administrator
City of CentelVille
1880 Main Street
CentelVille, MN 55038
Re: Peltier Lake Drive Area Street & Utility Improvements
City of CentelVille
Client Project No.: 2009.001
8onestroo File No.: 000616-09169-0
Dear Dallas:
The letter summarizes the circumstances surrounding proposed Change Order #3.
There are three subparts to Change Order #3. They are all related to subsurface conditions
encountered near the DNR wetland along the south side of Peltier Lake Drive. These conditions
were not Identified by the soil boring taken In this area. While the boring did Indicate the
presence of some organic material, It was only Identified in the top four feet of the existing
ground.
SU~Dart 1 - Muck Ey~vatlon and Liahtweiaht Badcfill
Unsuitable material (peat) has been discovered during the excavation for the water main
installation. In some areas, this material is only a few feet deep, but In other areas, it runs
deeper than the excavation necessary for the water main installation with no apparent bottom.
Aft:er consulting with American Engineering Testing, your solis engineer on the project, we have
come to a recommended course of action. This involves removal of all peat down to the top of
the new water main pipe. Normally, we would backfill with sand, but given the fact that the peat
continues, in some areas lower than the pipe, we need to backfill with lightweight material (wood
chips) to mimic the weight of the peat removed. Backfilling with sand could cause consolidation
(settling) of the peat below. This would cause problems for both the water and sewer mains as
well as the roadway.
We have attached a sketch of a two typical cross sections showing the plan of action. The cost
estimate attached to this letter assumes the worst case scenario of up to four feet of wood chip
fill. A letter from the contractor Is also attached detailing his pricing of the work.
SubDart 2 - Production Delavs Due to Unforsef!!n Soil Conditions
In this same area, the muck encountered caused the contractor delays In the installation of the
water main. The unsuitable materials necessitated the use of trench boxes, additional excavation
below the pipe to provide a stable base and the construction of a temporary by-pass road to
keep traffic from sinking in the muck. The attached estimate, along with the contractor's letter,
documents the cost of this work.
St. Paul
5t. Cloud
Rochester
Milwaukee
Chicago
Enqlnccfln9
Pli-Hlnmg
Innovation
aty of Centetville
PW Area Street & utility Imp.
Page 2
5127109
SubDart 3 - Underaround Debris Removal and DlsDOsal
While excavating for the installation of the water main in the area mentioned above, an
underground bridge structure was encountered. The structure was in the way of the proposed
water main and needed to be partially demolished. The contractor has provided a letter showing
two options for disposal of the material and has also shown costs for the initial removal of the
material from the trench. The time for this work has been verified with our inspector's diaries.
We are recommending utilizing the second option of drying, separating and recycling the material
which is about half the cost of landfilling the material as-is.
If the council finds the information provided to be satisfactory and wishes to move forward with
the work, it would be appropriate to have them approve Change Order #3 as presented.
Sincerely,
BONESTROO
~.,;4 .._A~l
Mark Statz, PE
City Engineer
651-604-4709
Attachments: Change Order #3 Costs
Letters and Documentation from the Contractor
Letter from American Engineering Testing
S'l4!Tl'H'! S oF' CUlS' SlA-n6NS' ~F ""..A.t\
cc: Paul Palzer - Public Works Director
RJG, CWL - Bonestroo
.
Bonestroo
Project Name: Pekier Lake Olivo Street and Utility Improvements
Client Project No.:
8id Openin9: Thu~day, March 12,2009 at 10A.M.
Bidder No.1
Forest Lake Contracting Inc
kern
kern
Units
Unn Price
Total
CHANGE ORDER 3:
PART I . MUCK EXCAVATION AND lIGKTWEIGfIT
BACKFILL
MUCK EXCAVATION (EV)
LIGHTWEIGHT 8ACKfllL (WOOD CHIPS) (LV)
SELECT GRANULAR 80RROW (LV) (I-WAY HAUL)
83 COMMON EXCAVATION (EV)
87 SELECT GRANULAR 80RROW (CV)
81 4" PERFORATED POLYETHYLENE DRAINTILE PIPE
WITH SOCK WRAP
SUBTOTAL PART 1
CY 3100 $15.20 $47,120.00
CY 3750 $28.00 $105,000.00
CY 1500 $16.60 $24,900.00
CY -850 $8.00 -$6,800.00
CY -1150 $14.00 -$16,100.00
LF .1000 $2.00 -$2,000.00
5152,120.00
PART 2 . PRODUCTION DElAYS DUE TO
UNFORSEEN SOIL CONDmONS
CREW HOURS
ACCESS ROAD GRAVEL
SUBTOTAL PART 2
HR
TN
17 $7SS.00
135 $8.00
$12,835.00
$1,080.00
$13,91S.OO
PART 3 . UNDERGROUND DEBRIS REMOVAL AND
OI5POSAL
CREW HOURS
DRYINGISEPERATlNGIHAULlNG OFFSITE
SUBTOTAL PART 3
HR
LS
2.1 $755.00
1 $5,600.00
$1,585.50
$5,600.00
57,1B5.50
TOTAL
$173,220.50
CO 3 Cost Estlmate.x1s
ST.l
!1J~G1f.'!!!
14777 LIk. DrIn
Forest LaIr., IIN 55D2!
PH: (651) 464-0t500
FAX: (651)464.4722
May 26, 2009
Bonestroo
clo Mr. Mark Statz, City Engineer
2335 Highway 36 W
St. Paul. MN 55113
Re: Changed Condition- Swamp Deposits
Dear Mark:
Previously unknown swamp deposits were discoverad between appro)limale street stations 1501-50
to 2001-50 while installing watermain. Construction methods were modified with City approval and
future work will be modified as determined by Bonestroo and AET in an effort to construct a stable
road capable of suppOrting new utilities and the roadway itself. Some additional costs have
oecurred for this wori( and are discussed below as well as prioing for other anticipated work.
Loss of Production/Access Road Contruetion
Based on as bid production, the 6" waterrnain was expected to take 15 hours of pipe crew time to
install from 15+50 to 2001-50. Due to the presence of the swamp deposits, the actual time was 32
hours. Production was slowed down due to poor soli conditions (peat), sorting and separating
clay from unsuitable peat, unstable trench conditions requiring the use of a trench box, Iilnd
constructing a temporary road on the boulevard to allow access to homes. FLC requests
compensation for lost pipe orew time at an hourly rata of $755 (for a total of 17 hr x $755/hr =
$12.835) and the cost of aggregate base/rock material (135 TN x $8.00rrN = $1080.00) used in
access roads to dale.
Prooosed Soil Correction Prlclna
Prices for the soli correction required in the muck area as follows. This will include select granular
borrow up to the aggregate base elevation.
Muck E)loavation (EV)
Select Granular Borrow (LV)
Wood Chips (L VJ
$15.20 per cubic yard
$16.60 per oubic yard
$28.00 per cubic yard
Sincerely,
FOREST LAKE CONTRACTING, INC.
W 6- LlrIJU
Robert D. Vollhaber
Vice President
AN EOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
May 21, 2009
Bonestroo
c/o Mr. Mark Statz, City Engineer
2335 Highway 36 W
St. Paul, MN 55113
Re: Extra Work- Buried Demolition Debris
Dear Mark:
Buried demolition debris was encountered yesterday in the watermain trench at approximately
station 18+00. The debris consists of concrete block, rebar, and wood mixed in with saturated
peat muck. Excavating and stockpiling of this material will be compensated under force account
payment. The stockpile is located in the Waterworks parking lot and I would estimate
approximately 130 tons of waste.
Because the debris include wood and high percentage of organic peat, it is not suitable for
recycling by crushing into class 7 aggregate base. J contacted Waste Management Elk River
Landfill and they would accept it in their demolition landfill. The cost for land filling (includes
loading, trucking, and landfill tipping fees) is $80.00 per ton.
Another option is to separate the debris from the peat muck. This would require air drying the
material, sorting through the pile to separate the wood, concrete, and rebar from the muck, and
recycling of the separated materials. The cost for separating/recycling option is $5600.00 lump
sum.
Sincerely,
FOREST LAKE CONTRACTING, INC.
Robert D. Vollhaber
Vice President
I .
FOREST J:.AKE CONTRAC1'ING, INC.
14777 LAKE DRIVE
FOREST LAKE, MN 55025
(651) 464.4500
FACSIMILJl: TRANSMITTAL SHEET
-roo Mo... k. s +...3 e
COMPANY! I
"ROI"le.J'~t:>
FAX NUMJ;~",
(, '5 I (, 7" - /J II
PToION B NUMBER!
If ROM:
"E.../o V~IIJ...",L~v-
oATS s- /2~
tcrriU. tJo, OF PAGES 'l'lL;V,JDINQ COI/ER,
-"f
SENDER'S "REFERENCE'. NtJMBEIl:
RE, r'C 1 ~ ; -e. 'I L 1<... t))1' _
YOUR nE~R1!NC:E NUMBER:
D URtll!NT ~ RnvIEW 0 I'LEASE COMMEN1' 0 PLEAS!> REPLY
D PLEASB RECYCLE
NOTE"o,;,}COMMBNTS;
~OIl'Ce. A-Cc.OlJl'\..+
se e.. ~ ft.Q.c, t...4..J
V'vl..(.le., ,.e.ll>'la"....1 ~o d<l4e
J<\.,'I'1 w..v-k.. o....Je..'I"'S'.
~ ;II. ~-'14.:ro
J
7S".t.
,....,,'-...., .."".. ......"'""....'..."...
........"......., ".......
~ "''''..../ VV"f
. GRADING
. ROAD CONll'mUCTION
. SewEFI.. WATER '
. EQUIPM~T R!NTAL
"',;..
14777 LAKE DRIVE
FOREST LAKE, MN. 55025
PHONE 651/464-4500
FAX 651/464-4722
WORK ORDER NO. 4 2 1 7
EQUIPMENT RENTAL ~ FORCE ACCOUNT
DATE 5"-/)L)-C> 9
RENTED TO: C, 'tV bF r:-€,.,/It'A Vlll r
ADDRESS:
JOB NUMBER OR LOCATION OF WORK:
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: !~lJ
I',v
t;.<f JA1.J'7o ,v
LABOR - NAME AND JOB DESCRIPTION
,,",Ilo' - .r::;,4';"'".v
-0
- t'n'
'1"
-
AMOUNT
/33.,1
'Z-
-
DIU
MATERIALS. SERVICES. SUPPLIES. SUBS
QUANTITY - RATE AMOUNT
PLUS SALES TAX ON MATERIALS
PLUS 15% ON MATERIALS, SERVICES, SUPPLIES AND SUBS & TAX
APPR,gVED BY:
~7r,d,~...-
Fa ,LAKE CONTRACTING, INC,
TOTAL
g~5. (PI
PURCHASER
NOTE: ABOVE LISTED eQUIPMENT INCLUDES OPERATOR UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.
....P.ot!ll.......1:l
V~T.T.f'lOO .... OFFlr::F.
PINK - PURCHASER
';fJIU!4t
~, 1He.
EQUIPMENT RENTAL. FORCE ACCOUNT
. GRADING
. ROAD CONBTIIUCTlON
. SEWER" WATER
. EQUIPMENT RENTAL
DATE S ~ :2D - 0 or
RENTED TO: CITY d'r Cf,vn;(vnlF..
ADDRESS:
14777 LAKE DRIVE
FOREST LAKE, MN. 55025
PHONE 651/464-4500
FAX 651/464-4722
WORK ORDER NO. 4 2 1 8
LABOR - NAME AND JOB DESCRIPTION
~LJ
r;
ltJE
.7
EQUIPMENT. NUMBER ANO DESCRIPTION. r HOURS RATE . AMOUNT
,
MATERIALS. SERVICES. SUPPLIES. SUBS
QUANTITY . RATE AMOUNT
PLUS SALES TAX ON MATERIALS
PLUS 15% ON MATERIALS, SERVICES, SUPPLIES AND SUBS & TAX
APPROVED BY:
&7~~~ ;
FO E LAKE CONTRACTING, INC.
TOTAL
'Z-&/. P1
PURCHASER
NOTE: ABOVE LISTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDES OPERATOR UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.
WHITE - OFFICE
YELLOW - OFFICE
!?INK - PURCHASER
9~
. ~, '711e.
EQUIPMENT RENTAL. FORCE ACCOUNT
. GRADING
. ROAD CONSTRUCTION
. SEWER & WATER
. EQUIPMENT RENTA~
14777 LAKE DRIVE
FOREST LAKE, MN. 55025
PHONE 651/464-4500
FAX 651/464-4722
WORK ORDER NO. 4 2 1 9
DATE J-~ j...."q
RENTED TO: C 1'1-'7" CT~ C~VIH,t:
ADDRESS:
JOB NUMBER OR LOCATION OF WORK: t7fo,;;.
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: H;?(/L ...t?~€.~ RvtfAtl.- t:)~ R04<O 77:)
~DA/T 'l'ALD
W,TERIALS. SERVICES. SUPe.LIES. SUBS
QUANTITY . RATE AMOUNT
PLUS SALES TAX ON MATERIALS
PLUS 15% ON MATERIALS, SERVICES, SUPPLIES AND SUBS & TAX
A~PROVED BY:
iflc7-d~
FO E LAKE CONTRACTING. INC.
TOTAL
'-/(:; 7, (p 0
PURCHASER
NOTE: ABOVE LISTED EQUIPMENT INCLUOES OPERATOR UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.
WIIITE - OFFICE
YELLOW - ornCE
~INK - PURCIIASER
-,
I
A AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
CONSULTANTS
. ENVIRONMENTAL
. GEOTECHNICAL
. MATERIALS
. FORENSICS
May 27, 2009
City of CenterviIle
c/o Bonestroo
2335 West Highway 36
St. Paul, MN 55113
Attn: Mark Statz
RE: Peltier Lake Drive Area Street and Utility Improvements
CenterviIle, Minnesota
AET No. 20-08832
Dear Mr. Statz:
This letter presents a review of the recommendations we provided during our meeting at site on
May 26, 2009. The topic of the meeting was the segment of Peltier Lake Drive to the west of
CenterviIle Road which is adjacent to the DNR wetland. During construction, organic swamp
deposits (peat, organic clay, and/or boglime) were found to be present below the proposed street,
roughly between Station 16+00 to 20+00. This organic condition was noted to be particularly
deep (below utility grades) between Stations 18+00 to 19+00 (approximate). This latter segment
will be referred to as the "Deep Swamp Area" in this letter report. The remaining area (where the
swamp was thin enough such that the utilities do not have swamp below) will be referred to as
the "Shallow Swamp Area."
1.0 Background
Soil borings were performed at the site by Braun Intertec in November of 2007. A boring was
placed on Peltier Lake Drive, although appears to have been placed just to the east of the limits
of the swamp. The boring indicates the natural inorganic soils in the area to be sandy lean clay
glacial tills.
A pre-existing sanitary sewer lies below the north side of the existing road. The sewer pipe
reportedly sagged through the Deep Swamp Area. We understand the sewer,wilt' be
reconstructed though this sagged area. w..tr 1b
In addition, a new watermain has been placed closer to centerline; the pipe being about 8 feet
below the final street grade. To provide foundation stability for the pipe, the waterrnain was
undercut by about 3 feet and rock foundation bedding was placed below the pipe, as well as to
the sides and just above the pipe. Sand was then placed above this, with the thickness of sand
only being about I foot in the Deep Swamp Area and about 3 feet in the Shallow Swamp Area.
Inferior on-site soils were then placed above this, recognizing that additional future correction
would be needed.
550 Cleveland Avenue North 1 SI. Paul, MN 55114
Phone 651-659-90011 Toll Free 800-972-63641 Fax 651-659-13791 www.amengtesl.com I AA/EEO ....
This document shall not be reproduced, except in fUll, without written approval from Amencan Englneenng Testlng, Inc. ,."
City of Centerville
c/o Bonestroo
May 27, 2009
Page 2 00
2.0 Meeting Recommendations
A meeting was held at the site on May 26, 2009 for the purpose of reviewing the construction
performed to date and the conditions observed, and arriving at appropriate recommendations for
reducing future roadway and utility movements. Based on this, engineered approaches were
discussed as presented below.
.
Please note that these discussed approaches are based on described conditions by field personnel
which were observable. However, we have no deep soil boring in the area for specific evaluation
of future movement. The intent is to reduce future movement as much as possible considering
time and reasonable cost. If the City cannot accept the potential for future movements, then
additional study, including more extensive field exploration and testing, must be performed.
Elimination of movements would likely need to be associated with pile foundation systems.
The soils which are supporting the reconstructed and new utilities have felt overburden load in
the past. Some of the overburden load was due to the organic swamp deposits, which have less
unit weight than the inorganic clay soils native to the site. We understand the swamp was
previously overlain by about 3 feet of the inorganic clay materials, meaning there has been at
least some pre-compression of the swamp soils.
The organic swamp materials should not be reused as backfill. Because these soils have been
disturbed from their previously "compressed" condition, the soils are uncompactible and have an
extremely high settlement potential. If inorganic mineral soils were to be used as backfill, the
mineral soils would have a higher unit weight than the peat soils they replaced. Therefore, load
on the soils supporting the pipe would be increased and could induce additional settlements.
Accordingly the intent of the backfilling operation should be to provide a lightweight material,
similar in weight to the swamp soils for those areas of the profile where swamp previously
existed. With the presence of the DNR wetland with standing water to the south of the street, it
is obvious that the soils below about 3 feet will be saturated. Accordingly, the appropriate
lightweight fill in this scenario is wood chips. The wood chips would have a unit weight similar
to the organic swamp materials.
Future earthwork should involve re-excavation of the street area down to the top of the sand fill
which was placed in the watermain trench. This depth would be roughly I foot above the pipe,
or 7 feet below proposed grade in the Deep Swamp Area. On either side of this, the subcut
would then be on the order of 5 feet below grade, which is about 3 feet above the pipe. The
excavation depth should then be carried laterally across the full width of the street, plus an
additional I foot of oversize beyond the curb. Tapering in the longitudinal direction (parallel to
centerline) should be somewhat gradual, preferably on the order of 10: I (H:V).
City of Centerville
c/o Bonestroo
May 27, 2009
Page3 of 3
The planned street section to be placed above the wood chip fill would then consist of the 3Y,
inches of bituminous over 8 inches of Class 5 aggregate base, which would then be placed upon
24 inches of Select Granular Borrow. With this section comprising the upper approximately 3
feet of the profile, the wood chip fill would then vary from about 4 feet thick in the Deep Swamp
Area to 2 foot thick in the Shallow Swamp Area.
The wood chip fill does not require vibratory compaction. Rather, the chips should be placed in
lifts and compacted with construction equipment. It is often desired to have the compaction done
with rubber tired hauling trucks, although due to the sensitivity of at least the lower zones of the
fill, this compaction can be done with tracked dozer equipment. Generally, four passes with this
equipment should suffice, although engineering adjustments may need to be made in the field
depending on the actual equipment used and on observations of the compaction process. The
initial lift of fill can be 2 foot thick. We then recommend using I foot lifts above this.
Below is a common specification for wood chip fill:
Wood chips shall be cut from sound live trees of any species and may be either "clean
chips" cut from debarked tree trunks or "total tree chips" cut from whole trees (including
bark and branches, but excluding leaves). The chips shall have a minimum nominal
length of % inches, a width of Y, inch or more, and a maximum fiber length of 6 inches.
We understand geotextile fabric is planned for this project. It should not be necessary to place a
geotextile fabric between the wood chip fill and the native soils within the excavation bottom.
However, the geotextile fabric should be placed between the wood chips and the Select Granular
Borrow material.
3.0 Closing
If you have any further questions regarding our recommendations presented, please do not
hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Reviewed by:
Z~E"I-~~i:I"'
a2oyen, PE
Vice President, Geotechnical Division
(65]) 659-1305
American Engineering Testing, Inc.
..P;:'/ ~
~/..
.. .-
arson
Senior Engineering Assistant
(651) 659-1363
11\
~DB~
,
~ '" ~ "V
-. /fI 8 f
... ~
I" 1/
~ 1'1 ...,
~ " 1 ,.
f ~
1: '" ...
~~ l. G ;j r
~t {I >
~ ! ~ (IQ f
if i '? " fI'
t ~ i 0
<.
C7 i ('\
'" iN ~ II t:>
"'II ,. F
N it " ~
. 0
~ f i · a f
(> ~H
it 0- Co
,. to !-
I; ~ . . .
~ - !i ~
~
\II ^
'" ) . . 1'I ( (
N ~~ . ~~~
...
""
l ~'l
\ . . '"
'"
~ l-i . ~
. . L
Date
4'; Bonestroo
Project:
Project 0 . ~-6'~"-O Page I
M~
Cllen, C4I'U,1Ih.l.l.
calculations for
('0
VI d l( V\
$ "11 ;~
0 ~ ~
'" .
~ 1. _
l~
C-
O (
""
'"
.!t
Project
Client r #. _ad
....._........I\..\.
Calculations for
1\\ f
Project 0 C,/r..()'IIIo, Page 2.
V ""'/l.J Date ~ %4 01
Date
~t Bonestroo
etf]tervi[[e
.', 'EstaNisfied 1857
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
1880!MainStnlt, Centervi/k, !M!N550J8
651-429-3232 or'FaJ(651-429-8629
RESOLUTION 09-0xx
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
RESOLUTION OPPOSING EXPANSION OF THE ANOKA COUNTY-BLAINE
AIRPORT RUNW A Y(S) AND OPPOSING ANY LEGISLATIVE EFFORTS TO
RECLASSIFY THE AIRPORT AS AN INTERMEDIATE STATUS FACILITY
WHEREAS, the Anoka County Board of Commissioners is giving consideration
to a resolution that would support an effort to extend the east-west runway at the Anoka
County-Blaine Airport to 6,000 feet; and,
WHEREAS, the draft Anoka County Board of Commissioners' resolution
proposes to support legislation that would allow for the extension of the runway; and,
WHEREAS, the Anoka County Board of Commissioners' resolution proposes
to support application for Federal funds to accomplish the runway extension; and,
WHEREAS, the neighboring communities to the airport appear to be
universally opposed to the expansion; and,
WHEREAS, an extension of the east-west runway to 6,000 feet would require
changes in state law and could change the defined class of the airport from minor to
intermediate; and,
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council is required by law and has provided an
Airport Development Guide that is required to take into consideration the physical,
social and economic needs of the Metropolitan area and as a result of those
considerations, the Airport Development Guide plan calls for the Anoka County-Blaine
Airport to be a minor airport; and,
WHEREAS, significant airport enhancements have already been made at the
Anoka County-Blaine airport to enhance the safety of aircrafts that use the airport, such
as a precision instrument landing system, high intensity lights and an operational control
tower; and,
WHEREAS, these improvements were intended to reduce the number and
frequency of noise complaints; and,
WHEREAS, the extension of the runway to 6,000 feet and upgrade of the airport
class to intermediate status would significantly expand the types of aircraft that could
regularly utilize the Anoka County-Blaine Airport and could result in significant
5?4-
increases in noise to residents in the communities near the airport.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the Centerville, that
the City opposes the Anoka County Commission's resolution to extend the Anoka County-Blaine
airport runway and to any legislative efforts to reclassify the airport to an intermediate status
facility, and directs the following to occur:
I. The City staff shall file this resolution with the Anoka County Board.
2. The Administrator is directed to notify Legislators for Centerville of the City's
opposition to the proposed expansion of the Anoka County-Blaine Airport.
Adopted this
day of May, 2009.
Mary Capra, Mayor
Attest:
Teresa Bender, City Clerk
5J~
NORTHLAND SECURITIES
May 18, 2009
Honorable Mary Capra, Mayor,
and Members of the City Council
Mr. Dallas Larson, Administrator
City of Centerville
1880 Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038
Re: Request for Proposals far Financial Consultant Services
Dear Mayor Capra, Council Members and Mr. Larson: i
Thank you very much for the opportunity to present our firm and proposal during the City's
May 13�h Council meeting. As you face the selection of a financial consultant at the May 27th
Council meeting, we would like to review the reasons why Northland Securities is the right fit
for the City of Centerville. A review of these four points follows:
1. Proven Record of Service to the Ci of Centerville - George Eilertson served the City's
public finance needs from 2000 to 2004. George is very familiar with a majority of the
City's existing bond issues. As well we assisted the City with the assignment of its first
bond rating.
2. We've Done our Homework / Ready to Hit the Ground Runnin¢ - Northland has a
very strong interest in renewing a professional relationship with the City. We have
done research that makes us uniquely ready to begin work immediately.
In relation to the 2009 Street and Utility Improvement Projects we have:
a) Met with the project engineer to revie�v the costs to properly size a bond,
b) Discussed the Green Infrastructure Grant and Loan with the State of MN Public
Facilities Authority,
c) Reviewed bonding options / enhancements such as a new bond rating and the
issuance of Build America Bonds in the interest of structuring the most cost-
effective financing for the City.
In regards to the Downtown Redevelopment Project, we have discussed the project with
Bill Beard and Ron Mehl of the Beard Group and are prepared to advise the City.
Northland Securities, Inc. 45 South 7th Street, Suite 2500, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Toll Free 1-HOO-HS1-2920 Main 612-851-5900 Fax 612-851-5987
www.nonhlandsecurities.com
Member FINRA and SIPC
a/
Page 2 of 2
May 18, 2009
3. More Services - Northland Securities is a fu11-service firm that can provide the City with
a full array of services to address all of it s public finance needs.
4. Talented and Experienced Staff - George Eilertson and Rusty Fifield are an established
and proven team that can successfully guide your upcoming projects. Cities have
trusted and counted on George and Rusty for years to deliver effective and efficient
financing solutions. This high level of experience will allow George and Rusty to be
more adept then the competition at providing the City with the insightful advice and
leadership needed to accomplish the City's financing objectives.
Thank you for your consideration, if you have any questions, please feel free to contact us at
612-851-5906 (George) or 612-851-4992 (Rusty).
Sincerely,
Northland Securities, Inc. '
� �o ��� ��� � I I
\ � ,
George D. Eilertson Rus 'e d j
Senior Vice President Senior Vice President I
I
I
I
i
i