HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-08-03 WS Packet
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
& MEETING
Wednesday, August 3, 2005
6:00 P.M.
L CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call
n. DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. Down Town Redevelopment Project & TIF PIan
2. 2006 Budget
3. CSAH 14 Memorandum of Understanding *Waiting for County Response'"
4. Water Hookup P06ey Implementadon (Bring Ordinance #45)
5. 20th to 21st Avenue Backage Road Connection
6. Economic Development Committee Goals
7. Personnel P06ey (Bring Your Copy)
8. Job Deseripdons (Bring Your Copies)
In. ADJOURNMENT
***Copies of Ordinance #45, Personnel Policy and Job Descriptions will be available if you are
unable to locate your copies***
Downtown Centerville
28 July 2005
Meeting Schedule
Meeting Date
jf>
August E-
AUgustlSth
August 30th
September 14th
September 2TD
October 12th
October 25th
November 16th
November 30th
December
Purpose
~"Iu:d +'
Meeting with Staff to review project scope, goals & process
^
Meeting with Downtown Business/Land Owners - walking tour of downtown
1st Meeting with Task Force - Introduction, Analysis & VISioning
Public Meeting #1 - Presentation of Analysis & VISioning
2nd Meeting with Task Force - Preliminazy Concept Review
Public Meeting #2 - Presentation of Alternatives
3rd Meeting with Task Force - Concept Refinement
Public Meeting #3 - Presentation of Refined Concept
4th Meeting with Task Force - Master Plan & Guidelines
Final Presentation to City Council
_____ Damon Farber Associates
1
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
For
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NUMBER 1-6
East Block 7 Redevelopment Project
(Redevelopment District)
of the
CITY OF CENTERVlLLE
AUGUST 24. 2005
PreDared bv:
John Meyer
Finance Director
City of Centerville
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NUMBER 1-6
(REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT)
Subsection 2.1. Statement of Objectives
Subsection 2.2. Development Program
Subsection 2.3. Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment
Finandng District No. 1-6
Subsection 2.5. Development Activity in Development
Project No. 1-6 for which Contracts
have been Signed
Subsection 2.6. Other Spedfic Development Expected
to Occur within Development District No. 1-6
Subsection 2.7. Estimated Cost of Project
Subsection 2.8. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness
Subsection 2.9. Sources of Revenue
Subsection 2.10. Estimated Original and Captured Tax Capadties
SUbsection 2.11. Type of Tax Increment Finandng District
SUbsection 2.12. Duration of Tax Increment Finandng District No. 1-6
SUbsection 2.13. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions
Subsection 2.14. Studies and Analysis Used for RBol ForD Determination
Subsection 2.15. Modification of Tax Increment Finandng
District No. 1-6 and/or Tax Increment Finandng Plan.
Subsection 2.16 Prior Planned Improvements
Subsection 2.17 Fiscal Disparities Election
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
4
5
5
5
5
EXHIBIT 1
Boundary Map and Legal Descriptions of
Tax Increment Finandng District No. 1-6, as established
Cash Flow Analysis
Public Notice
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 3
EXHIBIT 4
Proposed Development - Village Market (Phase One)
- Table of Contents -
SECTION I.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NUMBER 1-6
SUbsection 2. 1. Statement of Obiectives.
TIF DIsb1ct 1-6 Is being aeated to fadlltate development of a 32,000 square foot mixed use building on
parcels In the downtown area. See SectIon I, Development Program for Development DIsb1ct No.1,
Subsection B, Statement of Objectives.
SUbsection 2.2. DeveloDment Proaram.
See Section I, Development Program.
SUbsection 2.3. Parcels to be Induded in Tax Increment Finandna District No. 1-6.
The following parcels are located In the Oty of Centervllle, COunty of Anoka, State of Minnesota:
Lot 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 8i. 14, Block 7, Centervllle
(Parcel Numbers - 23-31-22-23-0005,23-31-22-23-0006, 23-31-22-23-0007, 23-31-22-23-0008,
23-31-22-23-0009, 23-31-22-23-0010, 23-31-22-23-0014)
(See EXHIBIT 1 for the map of Tax Inaement Rnandng DIstrict No. 1-6)
SUbsection 2.4. Parcels in Acauisition.
The Oty will be acquiring all parcels with this development project.
SUbsection 2.5. DeveloDment District Activities in DeveloDment District No. 1 for which Contracts
have been Sianed.
The following contracts have been entered Into by the Cty and the persons named below:
SUbsection 2.6. Other SDedfic DeveloDment ExDected to Occur within DeveloDment District No.1.
32,000 square foot retail/residential mixed use development (See EXHIBIT 4)
-Page1-
Subsection 2.7. Estimated Cost of Proiect.
The estimated costs of public Improvements to be made within Tax Increment Rnandng DIsb1ct No. 1-
6 are to be financed by tax Increments and other sources If necessary. These estimated costs are as
follows:
TAX INCREMENT FINANONG DISTRICT NUMBER. 1-6
Activity
EstImated Cost
Site Acquisition
Site Improvements
Road Improvements
Engineering/Contlngendes
Capitalized Interest
Administrative Expenses
$555,000
o
o
o
$ 90,000
$ 5.000
. $650,000
Total Project-Wide Improvements
No public Improvements will be made outside Tax Increment Rnandng Disb1ct No. 1-6.
SUPPORTIVE DATA FOR ESTlMATED COSTS OF IMPROVEMENTS
ITEM
GRADING AND SITE PREPARATION
BASIS FOR ESTlMATES
EstImates by Oty staff, consultants
and developer
PUBUC IMPROVEMENTS/UTIUTIES
EstImates by Oty staff, consultants
and developer
FIRE WATER/PONDS/UNES/PUMPS
EstImates by Oty staff, consultants
and developer
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
EstImates by Oty staff, consultants
and developer
Approximately 10% of tax increment
. expenditures allowed for I~I
, administration indudlng bol1d.
Issuance costs and planning
ADMINISTRATION
Subsection 2.8. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness.
The Oty is antldpatlng the issuance of $650.000 In General Obligation Taxable Tax Increment Bonds
relating to this project.
-Page2-
Subsection 2.9. Sources of Revenue.
Public Improvement oosts, acquisition, site preparation oosts and other oosts outlined In the EstImated
Cost of Project (Subsection 2.7 above) will be financed through the annual oollectlon of tax Increment
revenues as described below and such other permissible revenue sources as determined by the CIty
Including Bonds referenced In SUbsection 2.8. The aty expects to retain 100 percent of the tax
Increment for payment of the aty's obligations.
Subsection 2.10. Estimated OriGinal and Caaturecl Tax CaDBcities.
The most recent original tax capacity of Tax Increment Anandng DIstrict No. 1-6 Is estimated to be
$10.350.
The estimated captured tax capacity of Tax Increment Anandng DIstrict No. 1-6 at the time the tax
Increment beoomes payable Is expected to be $37.606.
Subsection 2.11. TVDe of Tax Increment FinandnG Disbict.
Tax Increment Anandng DIstrict No. 1-6 Is, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes SectIon 469.174, SUbd. 10,
a "Redevelopment DIstrict" defined as type of tax Increment finandng district oonslstlng of a project, or
portions of a project, within which the authority finds by resolution that one or more of the following
oondltions, reasonably distributed throughout the district, exists:
(1) parcels oonslstlng of 70 percent of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, streets,
utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures and more than 50 percent of the
buildings, not Indudlng outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial
renovation or dearance;
(2) the property oonslsts of vacant, unused, underused, Inappropriately used, or Infrequently used
rail yards, rail storage fadlltles, or excessive or vacated railroad rights-of-way;
(3) tank fadlltles, or property whose Immediately previous use was for tank fadlltles, as defined In
section 115C.02. subdivision 15, If the tank fadlltles:
(I) have or had a capacity of more than 1,000,000 gallons;
(II) are located adjacent to rail fadlltles; and
(III) have been removed or are unused, underused, Inappropriately used, or Infrequently used;
(4) a qualifying disaster area.
Subsection 2.12. Duration of Tax Increment FinancinG District No. 1-6.
The duration of Tax Increment Anandng DIstrict No. 1-6 Is expected to be twenty-three (23) years
from the receipt of the first tax Increment The date of receipt of the first tax Increment Is antldpated
In the year 2008. Thus, It Is estimated that the Tax Increment Anandng DIstrict, Indudlng any
modifications for subsequent phases or other changes would terminate In the year 2030.
-Page3-
SUbsection 2.13. Estimated Imoact on Other Taxina Jurisdictions.
Test No.1: The estimated Impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes construction would have
occurred without the creation of a Tax Increment Anandng District. If the construction Is a result of
tax Increment finandng, the Impact Is $0 to other entities.
Test No.2: Notwithstanding the fact that the fiscal Impact on the other taxing jurisdictions Is $0 due to
the fact that the finandng would not have occurred without the assistance of the City, the following
estimated Impact of the Tax Increment Anandng District would be as follows If Test No.1, the "but for"
test was not met:
IMPACT OF TAX BASE
% of
Captured
CUrrent Original Future Captured Tax
Tax Tax Tax Tax Capacity to
Entity Capadty Capacity Capadty Capacity Entity
Oty 2,833,134 10,350 52,800 37,606 1.33%
County 230,303,515 10,350 52,800 37,606 0.02%
ISO 12 18,268,572 10,350 52,800 37,606 0.21 %
IMPACT ON TAX CAPACITY RATES
CUrrent Captured
Tax Tax Potential Rate
Entity Rate Capacity Taxes Impact
Oty 52.842% 37,606 $19,871.77 0.70%
County 38.694% 37,606 $14,550.97 0.01%
'ISO 12 39.606% 37,606 $14,894.24 0.08%
Total 131.412% 37,606 $49,316.99 0.79%
- Page 4 -
Subsection 2.14. Studies and Analyses Used for DBut ForD Determination.
The following studies and analyses have been undertaken and reviewed In order to make the "but for"
findings provided for In the approving resolution of the Oty, as required pursuant to Section 469.177,
Subd. 3, dause 2 of the Tax Increment Rnandng Act: Such studies and analyses are on file In the office
of the Rnance Director.
Subsection 2.15. Modification of Tax Increment Financina District No. 1-6 and lor Tax Increment
Financina Plan.
As of August 24. 2005. no modifications to Tax Increment Rnandng DIstrict No. 1-6 or the Tax
Increment Rnandng Plan therefore have been made.
Subsection 2.16 Prior Planned ImDroyements.
In the 18 months prior to the dty's public hearing to consider approving the Tax Inaement Rnandng
Plan for Tax Increment Rnandng DIstrict 1-6, no building permits have been Issued on parcels induded
In the proposed Tax Increment Rnandng DIstrict.
Subsection 2. 17. Fiscal DisDarities Election.
The city elects to calculate fiscal disparities pursuant to Minnesota Statutes SectIon 469.177, Subd. 3,
dause b.
-Pages-
EXHIBrr 1
Boundary Map of Tax Increment Flnandng District No. 1-6,
as established AUGust 24. 2005
Tax Increment Finandng District No. 1-6
Map- TIF District 1-6 .
.r$.llI':tt4\1.
,I
~.~..:&
_MAP
e
i~~ L~
~...~
~
EXHIBIT 2
Cash Flow Analysis
~C!; ..-. *
l::! ~ e co e
~ N e
~~g VIt'l 0'1 .... e
~-VI- i cf ~ ..a &rl'
t * !
* * ""
I"- O'll"- \0 ~ \0 B 8
ij~~ ~l ~ .... r::! e
i i * e e
~ t .... ....
* It'l
-VI-
i ~i I"l e ~ l"- e
e It'l I"l 8
O'l N I"l I"l
~~ ~ i i e * 0\ e
~ It'l "" * m
-VI-
-VI-
~ ~ ..-. i e
~ O'l I"l ~
....It'l 8
~Nd VIt'l O'l Pl. I"l
~* i .... ...; 0\ e
It'l ~ * It'l
-VI- - -VI- It'l
-VI-
..-.
N O'l .... e e e ~ e
~ Q! ....1"- S ~ \0 8
V\O I"l
\Olevi' ~- g N ...; e
.... t ~ * .... G;
-VI- -VI- -VI- "" *
-VI-
I"- O'l \0 It'l e ..-. N 8
It'l
.... .... ,." It'l It'l 0'1 ~
~~~ ~~ N It'l N
e evi' ~ I"l e
~ It'l It'l .... m
-VI- * * "" *
-VI-
O'l It'l ~ e ..-. l"- e
I"l \0
e ~C!; It'l co .... 8
O'l \0 ..... I"-
~~~ o\~ e 'i; t ..a e
~-VI- It'l .... ....
- -VI- "" * \0
-VI-
co O'l I"- \0 e ~ I"l e
I"l .... O'l .... It'l I"l e 8
O'l VN l"- I"- e O'l
~Ma i~ e &rl' &rl' e e
It'l It'l * N I"l
* -VI- "" * \0
-VI-
e eco co ~ Pi' co 8
It'l -,." m .... I"l
I"- O'l I"- co O'l e
~N! ~ N &rl' N &rl' e
- I"l I"l N It'l
-VI- * * \0
"" -VI-
..-.
e ~8 8 e e e e
8 It'l It'l It'l 8
It'l It'l l"- N l"-
e t t &rl' ...; m- e
~~ ~ ~ I"l It'l
~ * \0
-VI-
J!l !
fiicu
~B ~ ~
;f
o.,s 8 I ~~
J ~I C
....
u..1!l ~ C.Q
~,s F ;faJ
I I !
.....
.
lfi
~~ J
0 0'10'1 GO 88 8 GO " 0
GO ... ... I") ~ ... -VI-
~~~ '<t1O 0'1 NN N ...
i~ 0 NN ~ ~ 0\
10 * I")
* *
I") ~~ \0 ~ \0 0 8
10 ~ ~ ~
~tij~ '<tN 0
i~ 0 1 .0 0 ~
10 * tt
-VI-
GO 0'1 \0 10 0 10 I") 8
... ... ... ~ 0 I") 10
~~~ '<to \0 GO ...
a\~ 0 t p) ~ 0
~* 10 * N ~
* *
GO 0'1" ~ 10 ... GO 0
~ "':8 N m ... 8
"=-* ... 10 I")
~~a I 0 i .0 ~ 0
10 * N
* * ...
-VI-
~ 0'110 i 0 ~ ~ 8
"'1 ~
~~~ "=-
I i 'i & p) iii'
... 10
-VI- * ...
*
v ~* 10 ~ 0 ~ 8
... ~ 0'1
~~~ "=-* I") I") I")
I i ~ ~ ~ 0
en
...
-VI-
~ 0'1 V N 8 i v 8
... N ~ ...
~~~ VI") I") 0'1
'* i i ~ iii'
I ~
-VI-
i ~3; 10 ..... ~ 8
I") N
... ~ ...
~!!I~ VI") GO V
0\* ~ .....i' ..... .0 ~
~ 10 * -VI-
-VI- -VI- '-'
-VI-
GO O'IN ... i ~ i 8
I") ... 0 l::!
~~~ VI")
i* i ..... ....: iii'
* * ro
-VI-
N 0'1 I") ... 10 \0 a 8
10 ... 0'1 ... N GO
ij~~ '<tN " 10 ...
0\* i i * .0 iii'
~ * N
I")
*
~ ~ ~~ ... 10 i Gl 8
~ "
'<tl") ... I") GO 0
~....: 0\* i .....i' .....i' iii' iii'
* ~ 10 * -VI- 10
-VI- '-' tt
... 0'1\0 ~ 0 10 ~ 8
N ... 10 10 N
~~a '<tN 10 ...
i* i ~ ~ ~ iii'
a
I" ~ I I
II i 1! i
I it
~..!. I
I ~I - 'O~ I-
s c.c ci J
1=0$ ~ it~ _VI
EXHIBIT 3
Public Notice
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERYlLLE
NonCE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 1-6 PLAN IN DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT #1
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the CIty Coundl of the Oty of Centervllle, Minnesota will meet on
Wednesday, August 24, 2005 In the Coundl Chambers of Centervllle Oty Hall located at 1880 Main Street,
Centerville, Minnesota mmmendng at 6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter to mnsider spending $650,000 for
activities associated with a tax Increment district. The legal desalptlon of the district Is as follows:
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, & 14, Block 7, Centerville
MaD-TIF Disbict 1-6 .
>>r$ll'(l<.t-
"
",6.'1
--
~
..,
...-.-
i~ 'A~
~
B.I
.,
The City Hall Is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assisted devices or a sign language Interpreter must be
received before 4:00 p.m. August 19, 2005. All persons Interested are Invited to attend and to be heard,
verbally or In writing. You may call Oty Hall at (651) 429-3232 If you have any questions.
You may contact the City Oerk's offlce at (651) 429-3232 or by facsimile (651) 429-8629 If you need additional
Information or to obtain a copy of the proposed tax Increment flnandng plan. If you desire, you mayemall:
dlarsonCCllcentervlllemn.com or jmeyerCCllcentervlllemn.com with questions or concerns. This notice Is also
available on the Oty's web site: www.centervlllemn.com.
Teresa Bender/Oty Oerk, MCMC
Published In the Quad Community Press on July 26, 2005
July 15, 2005
Dr. Roger Warner, Superintendent
ISD # 12
District Office
4707 North Road
Circle Pines, MN 55014
Dear Dr. Wamer:
The City of Centerville is proposing to create a plan for Tax Increment District Number 1-6. Tax
Increment District Number 1-6 is a redevelopment district located in Development District Number 1.
Tax Increment District Number 1-6 involves expenditures totaling approximately $650,000.00 for site
acquisition, capitalized interest and administrative activities (administrative expenses do not exceed 10% of the
project cost). The city will need to borrow for all the expenditures anticipated in the plan. The proposed
development would not be possible if this tax increment financing plan were not implemented. No county road
improvements are needed to support this plan. The anticipated tax capacity capture from proposed activities
included in this plan within the proposed tax increment district is 42,975 at completion.
To solicit public input and complete the plan adoption process, the city will be holding a public hearing on
August 24. 2005 at 6:30 PM at city hall to receive comments on the plan. If you have any questions or
comments, please don't hesitate to contact me at 651-429-3232.
Sincerely.
JOVtV\, w. Metjey
John W. Meyer
City of Centerville
Finance Director
PS: Attached is a copy of the Tax Increment Financing Plan
July 15,2005
Ms. Rhonda Sivarajah, Commissioner
Anoka County
2100 3n1 Avenue
Anoka, MN 55303
Dear Commissioner Sivarajah:
The City of Centerville is proposing to create a plan for Tax Increment District Number 1-6. Tax
Increment District Number 1-6 is a redevelopment district located in Development District Number 1.
Tax Increment District Number 1-6 involves expenditures totaling approximately $650,000.00 for site
acquisition, capitalized interest and administrative activities (administrative expenses do not exceed 10% of the
project cost). The city will need to borrow for all the expenditures anticipated in the plan. The proposed
development would not be possible if this tax increment financing plan were not implemented. No county road
improvements are needed to support this plan. The anticipated tax capacity capture from proposed activities
included in this plan within the proposed tax increment district is 42,975 at completion.
To solicit public input and complete the plan adoption process, the city will be holding a public hearing on
August 24, 2005 at 6:30 PM at city hall to receive comments on the plan. If you have any questions or
comments, please don't hesitate to contact me at 651-429-3232.
Sincerely,
JDVlII\, w. Me~eY
John W. Meyer
City of Centerville
Finance Director
PS: Attached is a copy of the Tax Increment Financing Plan
July 15, 2005
Mr. John U Jay" Mclinden, County Administrator
Anoka County
2100 3rd Avenue
Anoka, MN 55303
Dear Mr. Mclinden:
The City of Centerville is proposing to create a plan for Tax Increment District Number 1-6. Tax
Increment District Number 1-6 is a redevelopment district located in Development District Number 1.
Tax Increment District Number 1-6 involves expenditures totaling approximately $650,000.00 for site
acquisition, capitalized interest and administrative activities (administrative expenses do not exceed 10% of the
project cost). The city will need to borrow for all the expenditures anticipated in the plan. The proposed
development would not be possible if this tax increment financing plan were not implemented. No county road
improvements are needed to support this plan. The anticipated tax capacity capture from proposed activities
included in this plan within the proposed tax increment district is 42,975 at completion.
To solicit public input and complete the plan adoption process, the city will be holding a public hearing on
August 24, 2005 at 6:30 PM at city hall to receive comments on the plan. If you have any questions or
comments, please don't hesitate to contact me at 651-429-3232.
Sincerely,
JoVlV'v W. Metjey
John W. Meyer
City of Centerville
Finance Director
PS: Attached is a copy of the Tax Increment Financing Plan
i
I
L_
EXHIBIT 4
Proposed Development - Village Market (Phase One)
,
,
,
~
O~
~
I~
jO
O~
O~
O~
O~
Ij
O~
O~
O~
~
I~
jO
(f)
~
I
I
;n
o
~
I. I
--l
01 I--
F~
-
01 - ~
';!!:
jO
-
-
r,-
c- 01
01 -
r--
01
'-i
!I ~
II
~
01 Oi r JI ~/ ~
=II ^'
III!I L
'-i
J
I
- 01
01 01
-
-
,
01 01 =---
-- t--
~
~
>'
;iO
,
CD
I~
g~
ci(J\
I{!J
l>
"1J
l>
~
Z
-I
r
~
c:.
-I
1
28'-0"
}
i
I
ion
~
q
:i!i
~Oli
~
2 !
~O~
Ii
O~I
l~
~
l~
~ d ~ ~ ~'~ ~ c ~
~; ~I ~I ~~~~I P...p~~~~~1 ~il~1 ~l~1 i~~1 !
; ! i ;!!! ~~il~i~iil ~;i ;!I !~~I i
~ I I I~!I i ~ii I i ~ I ~ Ii
~ i I ;!. s ~ ~I
B 2 ~ a
~ 8
~
J
erviffe
~1S57
City of Centerville
Proposed 2006 Budget
Presented: August 3, 2005
First Draft
City of Centerville
NalTBtive for 2006 Proposed Budget
July 28, 2005
Attached Is the first draft of the Year 2006 General Fund Budget for the Cty of Centervllle. This report Is
Intended to disclose all assumptions used In calculating the proposed budget and explain any Significant
variances from last year.
The following assumptions were made in calculating the draft budget:
Revenues:
TaxLevv
The general tax levy was Increased by $51,000 for additional spending (3% Im;rease) and
$84,431 to recover a loss In property taxes because of the legislative cut to Market Value
Homestead Credit. At this proposed levy amount, initial tax capacity figures indicate
that a tax rate decrease of 70/0 will occur resulting in the tax rate declining from
52.841 to 49.132. If Coundl desires to Increase or decrease the proposed tax levy amount,
adjustments can be made to other areas of the budget to compensate.
Local Government Aid
The dty will receive $22,064 In local government aid In 2006.
Anob County CommunitY DeveloDment Block Grant Funds (CDBGl
The city will receive an additional $200,000 In CDBG funds to assist In the redevelopment of "East
Block 7" In 2006.
Ucenses and Permits
Ucenses and Permits revenues will be remain stable with the antldpated development of Hunters
Crossing and the Pheasant Marsh Addition that should be under construction this year.
Fines and Forfeits
Rnes and forfeits have been reduced to reflect the downward trend.
Expenditures:
Salaries and Benefits
The following assumptions were made In calculating salaries and benefits for the 2006 budget
All percentages can easily be adjusted on the attached spreadsheets:
~ 3% structure increase (COLA);
~ 4% step Increase for eligible employees;
~ A legislative mandated Increase contribution rate to PERA;
~ The budget reflects additional salary for part time help in Public Works and
Administration (document scanning);
~ Allocations were changed to more accurately reflect actual time spent, resulting
In slight differences In distributions across departments;
~ OVertime was calculated at 5% of the annual salary for the two existing Public
Works employees;
~ $77 per employee per month Increase In health Insurance contribution, In
accordance with the union contract. Insurance rates are expected to rise by
10% - 15% In January 2006.
,.
Elections
There will be a Oty election In 2006.
Buildina
The OW Hall budget was Increased to accommodate an Increase In utility charges.
TechnolOGY ImDrovements
Year two technology Improvements are Included In the 2006 budget
Police Administration
The 2006 budget amount of $577,376 from the Centennial Lakes Police Deparbnent Is reflected
In the budget.
Fire Protection
The 2006 budget amount of $91,000 from the Centennial Rre Deparbnent Is reflected In the
budget.
Public Works
Salary allocations were weighted heavier for the Public Works function for 2006. In addition,
electricity charges were Inaeased.
Parks and Recreation
We have not yet received a recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Committee regarding
the Parks Programs budget The estimates shown are ours based upon historical data.
Economic DeveloDment
We have not yet received a recommendation from the Economic Development Committee
regarding the EDC budget. The estimates shown are ours based upon historical data.
CitY Festival
The OW festival budget Indudes an estimated $17,000 appropriation from the aty (a $1,000
Increase over this year), plus a proposed $3,000 pass-through donation from gambling funds.
Transfers Out
This line Item Indudes a proposed $102,000 transfer to the 2004 Munldpal Street Debt Service
Fund to cover the CIty's portion of the street project obligation and $78,500 for lease payments
on the Joint Police Station.
CaDltalOutlav
Capital outlay In the amount of $193,124 Is available In the 2006 proposed budget for capital
needs such as the public works building addition.
I wish to thank the aty Administrator, Public Works Director, aty staff and the aty Coundl for their
patience and help with the preparation of this draft budget I am available to answer any questions you
may have regarding the proposed budget or budget process. Thank you for your patience and
understanding.
Respectfully Submitted:
JohV\. W. Mel1er
Finance Director
Approved By:
DttLLtts UtrsoV\.
Adminisb'ator
General Fund 2006 Budget
Budget Proposed
2005 2006 Budget
Revenues:
Property Taxes 1,700,000.00 1,751,000.00
other Taxes & Assessments 62,850.00 84,500.00
Licenses & Permits 192,300.00 195,000.00
Building Inspection 167,500.00 168,000.00
Fines & Forfeits 52,100.00 30,000.00
Intergovemmental 106,150.00 110,000.00
Fire Relief Aid 93,250.00 95,000.00
Anoka Co. COBG 0.00 200,000.00
Charges for Services 1,500.00 2,000.00
Interest Earnings 25,000.00 40,000.00
Miscellaneous Revenues 5,100.00 10,000.00
Refunds & Reimbursements 3,000.00 4,000.00
Fund Balance 0.00 0.00
Total Revenues 2,148,000.00 2,426,500.00
Expenditures:
Current
General Government
Mayor and Council 22,700.00 23,000.00
Elections 0.00 5,000.00
Planning & Zoning 6,000.00 10,000.00
Administration 295,333.00 325,000.00
Financial Administration 16,000.00 16,000.00
Assessing 18,000.00 20,000.00
Legal 86,000.00 90,000.00
City Hall 31,100.00 30,000.00
Total General Government 475,133.00 519,000.00
Public Safety
Police Protection 550,475.00 577,376.00
Fire Prot~on 187,393.00 186,000.00
Building Inspection 151,216.00 155,000.00
Electrical Inspection 9,000.00 9,000.00
CMI Defense 2,100.00 4,000.00
Animal Control 1,500.00 1,500.00
Total Public Safety 901,684.00 932,876.00
Public Works
Public Works 188,427.00 170,000.00
Engineering Services 15,500.00 15,000.00
Recycling 5,000.00 5,000.00
Streets 80,000.00 80,000.00
Street Lighting 25,000.00 27,000.00
Total Public Works 313,927.00 297,000.00
7/29/2005
12:23 PM
budget 2006 first draflxls
Culture and Recreation
ParklRec. Committee
ParklRec. Programs
Park Maintenance
Total Culture and Recreation
Community Development
Economic Development
Economic Development
EDC - Frozen Fete Des Lacs
EDC - Business Directory
EDC - Business Promotion
EDC - Miscellaneous
Cougar Cash
Total Economic Development
Unallocated
Refunds & Reimbursements
City Summer Festival
Total Miscellaneous
Total Current ExpendRures
Capital Outlay
General Government
Public Safety
Streets and Highways
Culture and Recreation
Total Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
EXCESS (DEFICIT) OF REVENUES
OVER EXPENDITURES
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Operating Transfer In
Operating Transfer Out
GO Improvement 2004B
Joint Police Station Lease
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING
SOURCES (USES)
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF
REVENUE AND OTHER FINANCING
SOURCES OVER EXPENDITURES
AND OTHER FINANCING USES
Budget Proposed
2005 2006 Budget
2,100.00 2,500.00
7,366.00 10,000.00
62,620.00 65,000.00
72,086.00 77,500.00
0.00 200,000.00
6,300.00 6,500.00
6,300.00 6,500.00
0.00 0.00
19,000.00 20,000.00
19,000.00 20,000.00
1,788,130.00 2,052,876.00
24,870.00 36,000.00
0.00 0.00
128,000.00 100,000.00
105,000.00 57,124.00
257,870.00 193,124.00
2,046,000.00 2,246,000.00
102,000.00 180,500.00
0.00
(102,000.00)
(102,000.00)
0.00
(102,000.00)
0.00
(180,500.00)
(102,000.00)
(78,500.00)
(180,500.00)
0.00
0.00
7/29/2005
PREPARED BY: JOHN MEYER, FINANCE DIRECTOR
budget 2006 first draft.xls
12:23 PM
DATED July 29, 2005
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FOR THE RECONSTRUCl'ION OF COUNTY STATE AID mGHWAY 14 (MAIN
STREET) BETWEEN 1-35 W AND 1-35 E IN THE CITIES OF CENTERVILLE AND
UNO LAKES, MINNESOrA
(&p. OUI4-24)
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOll) is between the CoUDty of Anoka, State of
subdivision of the State ofMinneso1a. 2100 Third Awnue North. Anoka, Minnesota.. 5
referred to as "County". and tbe C~ ofCenterWle, a nmnicipal corporation
Minnesota, 1880 Main Street, CenterviIle. Minnesota 55449 hereinafter
It is agreed that the Exhibit "A" Layout dated July 29. 200S and accepted by the parties
except as identified in 1his MOU and is suitable for preparation of 5i€'on doonmentR, Any
significant changes made hereafter to the design as pI.....med in the . .. yout will require approval
by the parties as an amendn'lent to 1his MOU or addressed in a separate . ~=ment (JPA) ht will
furmaIize 1his MOU. These same changes will . ~ in tbe cost to include any addi1ional
design engineering cost that may occur.
INTERSEcnONS:
, '-,'/
It is understood that future improvemcots may be required at the CSAH 14 and 21st Avenue N intersection to
8C(zu..... ....te improvements for the future intercbange at 1-35 E. It is understood tbat improvemcots will u:ed
to be made to CSAH 21 and County Road 54 in the future as development occurs. ImprovemaJIs may include
but are not limited to: twn lanes, through lanes, Glrtension of concrete lIIlldians. The parties will JD:et jointly to
consider any future improvemcots. The cos1s oftbese improvements will be determined at the 1ime of
oonstrucIion and may be shared by the County. City and Developer.
Page 1 or,
N:\BfPway 14~.dIloO'Ul444MCIll7.>>05.4oc
RIGHT OrWAY:
The parties agree that the County wiD acquire ellllllCCSSlll')' right-of-way and ~ for the Prqjeot.
Acquisition of any additional right-of-way and/or ~ needed fur the improvements to the City street
intersec1ions beyond vmat is defined in the Exhibit "A to Layout will be the responsibility of the City. The
parties agree that parcels required for the project that are owned by the City will be conveyed to the County at
no cost to the County. The parties agree that any properties acquired by the County within CenterviIle that are
in excess of the right-of-way needed fur the project and are "uneconomic temnants'" shall be conveyed to the
city. The city shall have the first right of refusal to purchase Dllll'ketable excess property at . market
values that the county bas pwcbased. It is agreed by the parties that the City shall
m..- ....../t searches required for the Prqject at no cost to the County. It is agreed by that ell
necesBIIIY right ofway and ea............... will be in legal possession of the County pri of bids for
theprojeot.
BITUMINOUS TRAIL AND CONCRETE SIDEWALK:
TRAmCSIGNALS:
Oth Avenue N) intersec1ion. The parties agree that
are met. The parties agree that conduit wiD be
on fur a future signal; however, the existing f01D'-way stop
is installed. Bec:ause CenterWle is a City under 5,000
on this project are solely the County's expense.
""
. to a right-in, right-out condi1ion until the interchange at I-35E in
1he layout pR18eIlts how access to the south of Main S1reet wiD be
. of the I-35E interchange.
The parties agree that the construction of the bitmninous trail and
funds and that ell ma.tobill8 fimds wiD be contributed by the City.
1rail and walk includes: bituminous and concrete surfilcing,
correction, excavation, borrow material (granular and topsoil), and
the County will pay fur the design of the 1rail and walk, wetland ..
location, and any RlIIlOWl items, with the
County wiD apply for funds through the Metro Pat'
atmr construction.
A traffic signal is anticipated at
the signal wiD be installed .
cons1ructed at CSAH 14J
condition will be .
population, the costs of the
~
Flap-" "
. the future
NTRO.
The parties and agree that CSAH 14 wiD be closed with tmffic detoured fur a period of1ilnl= to
perfimn soil . on, construct the new bridge CMI' Rice Creek, and possibly a land bridge between Peltier
Lake and . e Lake. The closure will be limited to the period of1ilnl= required to complete the soil
correction and cons1ruct two paved lanes in the area requiring soil COJ'RlCtion and cons1ruct the bridge(s).
DRIVEWAYS:
The parties agree that ell driveways affected by the Prqject will be reoonstructed in kind with the cost of any
upgrades requested by the City including concrete aprons to be the responsibility of the City. Tum-arounds on
driveways wiD be paid for by the County.
LANDSCAPINGlSTREETSCAPING:
Page20fS
N:~14~14031M0ll7--.cIac
The parties agree that iftbe City wishes to include la.ndseapingfstreetscape features in tile Project, tbcy sha11 be
designed in accordaDce withAnoka ~ Hi8h-Y Department LandscapeIS1ree Guidelines. Tho cost
of tile design and construc1ion of1hese features will be tile responsibility oftbe City. The City sbaD prcMde all
construc1ion documents including plans, specifications, and estimated quan1ities and cost to tile County for
inclusion in tbe project bid dOClUneJlfR. AD construction dn"llmenfR must be submitted to tile County by April
30,2006.
UTIUTIES:
The parties agree that tbe Exbibit "A" Layout does include specific PlOposed
tile City. The City's design of tile sanitary sewer and water main
and estilJl8tCllf quantities and cost. AD construc1ion docm,.,.tts
2006.
PERMITS:
Tho parties agree that tile County wiD secure all
coordimte with tile County in securing tile permits
also 88fCllS to secure any permits required for .
streetscape items.
PONDS:
Tho ponds ~ of2ffh A'VeJlUe repn:sent a "placeholder" for tbe stormwater ponding
needs at ~ of tile . County wiD work with tbe City to explore altmJate ponding 1oca1ions
~itber.. . tile project or t later elate if tile relocation is cost effective and pnMdes the quanti1a1ive and
. needs of the stormwater --rnent
BACO~~
Tho County ~ support tile city's effort to COJJStruct a hackage rosd between 2ffh and 211& Avenues
approximately6O feet south ofCSAH 14. The cost oftbe right-of-way acquisition, engineering and
construc1ion \W1Ild be solely that of tile City. The County would CODSider a share of1bis cost iftbis route could
be used to tile County's benefit as a detour or bypass route to aid in tbe construction ofCSAH 14.
SUMMARY:
Upon acceptance and signatures by tbe parties oftbis MOO, a separate joint powers ~eement for cost share
and maintenance wiD be prepared by tbe County for execution by tbe City and tile County prior to acceptance
ofbids for 1bis project. The joint powers 881eement to followwiD timmIize all estimated and actual cost
shares. The parties leoosWze the difficult IBtore of1bis project and every effort wiD be made to reduce tbe
Page 3 of'
N:11IIllbwaY 14 PJqectlCedenillleOl4-7AM0II7.19.o5.dac
impacts to acljoining properties. Construction work will be staged to continue daily aecess to the properties that
do not have alternate aecess.
In the interim, the attached Exbibit "C" provides an estimate of tile construction cost &bare of the Project and
Exhibit "D" outlines County policy for cost splits on construction projects.
~
!P
A:",./~.
" '(~
." " "
""" . .1'
)/
"
"
" ""
". "
"" "v~/
'., /
)./
Page4of5
N:1Bf8lwiay 14Pill1~1444M0Il7.>>05Aac
COUNTY OF ANOn
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
By:
By:
May Capra
~r
Margaret Langt'eld, Chair
Anoka County Bomd
ofec,~ioners
Dated:
A'ITEST:
By:
I
John "Jay" McLinden
Anoka County }.dmm1RfTator
Dated:
Nat:nc
AND EXECUTION:
By:
:Nami:
Page' of'
N:\BlaIIWBf 14 Plqf~..lIIeIlUl<WAM0U7-2M5.doc
~ II
8: !l;,.
~'; I
r~ ~
I ~l__~li
i -
I': ,~
g .
~ ~ ~
~
0> .r;;
Jill /-
,f"'\ ~"~
_.t:.~- ".'-'
5:..'- ."::'.
I.! I~ ":j
~ '/.. .8-',~
C\J '" l4\..... to:
./ WtlI ~
0> \,. .....
~ JI J
1:
CII
'1
15.
:i:
<[
C\J
~
-.. -''''--.. t---1. -.. _ ,_"
........1:'....'. .
..,..
-&:
Q)
"
...c
\fl
~: , ',1
~
~
.,
~
l.t1.
f....
cO
..:~~
, I
~
i
"~
" 1
~~"'l.I~
;ts ~w.~.. .
/4SdI. "
.
~Z
i