HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-02-06 P & Z Agenda
ctervi{{e
utaG{ished 1857
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMITTEE
MEETING AGENDA
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 2001
6:30 p.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER
1. RollCall
II. PUBLIC HEARING (S)
I. Ordinance #39 - Sign
III. APPEARANCES
I. Honorable Mayor and Council Members
IV. OLD BUSINESS
V. NEW BUSINESS
1. Mr. Terry Sager - Mini Storage
2. Ordinance #39 - Sign
3. Site Plan Review Checklist
VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS
VII. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
1. January 2, 2001 Meeting Minutes
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
"
\
,
,
l
\ ,
t,l;
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Jim March, Administrator
SUBJECT: Signage Ordinance #39
DATE: February 2, 2001
Per Council request, Ordinance #39 has been returned to you for consideration.
Two modifications have been included:
Page 7, Section 030 - 010: ResidentiallPublic Districts (RI, R2, R2A, R4, R5 & PI),
Permitted Signs (C. Business Signs)
"Home-based businesses may have a sign that is no larger than four (4) square feet."
"The sign may not be an interior-illuminated sign."
Please review and consider the above stated request.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ORDINANCE #39
PAGE NUMBER
DIVISION 10: General Provisions
Section 010-010: Title............................................................................... 1
Section 010-020: Purpose and Intent ....................................................... 1
Section 010-030: Repeal of Conflicting Ordinances .................................1
Section 010-040: Definitions ..................................................................... 1
Advertising Sign .............................................................................. 1
Area Identification Sign ................................................................... 1
Billboard.. ..................... ................... ...... ..... ............ ......................... 2
Business Frontage........ .... ........... ... ...... .... ...... ....... ... ......... ........ ..... 2
Business Sign ................................................................................. 2
Canopy............................................................................................ 2
Changeable Copy Sign ................................................................... 2
Directional Sign ............................................................................... 2
Flags............................................................................................... 2
Flashing Sign .................................................................................. 2
Freestanding Sign ...........................................................................2
Historical Identification Symbols ..................................................... 2
Illuminated Sign ..............................................................................2
Major Anchor............... ............................................ ................... ..... 2
Motion Sign ..................................................................................... 2
Political Sign ............................................................................. 2 - 3
Portable Sign .................................................................................. 3
Setback............. ......... ................ ..... ...... ............... ...................... ..... 3
Sign.................................................................................................3
Sign Area ........................................................................................3
Sign Height ..................................................................................... 3
Temporary Sign. .......... ...... ...... .... .......... .... ............ .... ... ..... ...... ....... 3
Wall Advertising Sign ...................................................................... 3
Window Sign ...................................................................................3
DIVISION 15: General Regulations.............................................................. 3 - 5
DIVISION 20: Permitted Signs with No Permit Required
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ORDINANCE #39
PAGE NUMBER
DIVISION 20: Permitted Signs with No Permit Required
Section 020-010: Political Signs ............................................................... 5
Section 020-020: Temporary Signs .................................................... 5 - 6
Section 020-030: Directional Signs........................................................... 6
Section 020-040: Memorial Signs .............................................................6
Section 020-050: Freestanding Signs....................................................... 6
Section 020-060: Window Signs ............................................................... 6
DIVISION 25: Portable Signs ............................................................................ 6
DIVISION 30: District Regulations
Section 030-010: Residential/Public Dist. (R1, R2, R2A, R4, R5 & P1)... 7
Section 030-020: Commercial District (B1)............................................... 7
Section 030-030: Industrial District (11)............................................... 7 - 8
Section 030-040: Mixed-Use District (M1) ................................................ 8
DIVISION 35: Comprehensive Sign Plan Required ......................................... 8
Section 035-010: Application for Permit............................................... 8 - 9
DIVISION 40: Adjustments and Appeals.......................................................... 9
DIVISION 45: Non-Conforming Signs
Section 045-010: Legal, Conforming ........................................................ 9
Section 045-020: Legal, Non-Conforming, Sign...................................... 10
DIVISION 50: Enforcement.............................................................................. 10
DIVISION 55: Effective Date............................................................................ 11
ii
Effective - -01
City of Centerville Ordinance #39
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
ORDINANCE # 39
An ordinance regulating signs in the City of Centerville,
Minnesota and providing for the administration and enforcement
of such regulations.
The City Council of the City of Centerville ordains as follows;
DIVISION 10: General Provisions
Section 010-010: Title. This ordinance shall be known as Ordinance #39, City
of Centerville Signage Ordinance except as herein referred to as "this
Ordinance".
Section 010-020: Purpose and Intent. It is the purpose of this Ordinance to:
. Establish a set of standards for the fabrication, erection, use and
maintenance for signs, symbols, markings, advertising devices or
other items that serve as visual communication media.
. Allow creativity in sign design while at the same time ensuring that
the public is not endangered, annoyed, distracted or displeased by
unsafe, disorderly, indiscriminate and unnecessary use of visual
communication media.
. Administration and procedures for requiring permits, payments of
fees and providing for penalties for non-compliance.
Section 010-030: Repeal of Conflicting Ordinances. Those parts of
Ordinance #4 (Zoning Ordinance) or any parts of other Ordinances inconsistent
herewith are hereby repealed. In all other respects said Ordinance #4 (Zoning
Ordinance) and other Ordinances shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 010-040; Definitions.
Advertising Sign - An "Advertising Sign" is a sign, which directs attention to a
business commodity, service or entertainment not exclusively, related to the
premises where such a sign is located or to which it is affixed.
Area Identification Sign - A freestanding sign that identifies the name of a
residential subdivision, commercial or industrial development.
Page 1 of 11
Effective - -01
City ofCenterville Ordinance #39
Billboard - A sign erected for the purpose of advertising a product, event, person
or subject not entirely related to the premises on which the sign is located.
Business Frontage - The linear frontage of that portion of a building facing the
right-of-way and occupied by one separate business.
Business Sign - A "Business Sign" is any sign which identifies a business or
group of businesses, either retail or wholesale, or any sign which identifies a
profession or is used in the identification or promotion of any principal commodity
or service, including entertainment, offered or sold upon the premises where
such sign is located.
Canopy - A permanent roof structure attached to and supported by the building.
Changeable Copy Sign - Any sign that is characterized by changeable copy,
letters or symbols, regardless of method of attachment.
Directional Sign - An on-premises sign designed to guide or direct pedestrian or
vehicular traffic.
Flags - Devices generally made of flexible materials, such as cloth, paper of
plastic, and displayed on poles, strings or wires, but excluding the flag of any
country or state.
Flashing Sign - An illuminated sign on which such illumination is not kept
constant in intensity or color at all times, when such sign is in use.
Freestanding Sign - Any sign supported by structures or supports that are
permanently anchored in the ground and that are independent from any building
or structure.
Historical Identification Symbols - Those symbols which have historically been
identified with the service the establishment provides, are common to similar
enterprises in all other localities and are not a particular trademark or business
identification.
Illuminated Sign - A sign that has an artificial light source directed upon it or
which has an interior light source.
Major Anchor - A single tenant in a shopping center that is at least 20% of the
total square footage and in excess of 50,000 square feet.
Motion Sign - A sign that revolves, rotates or moves.
Political Sign - Any sign which states the name or picture of an individual
seeking election or appointment to a public office, or pertaining to a forthcoming
public election or referendum, or pertaining to or advocating political views or
policies erected on private property, which is erected by a bona fide candidate for
political office or by a person or group supporting such a candidate and which
Page 2 of 11
Effective - -01
City of Centerville Ordinance #39
contains the name of the person or group supporting such a candidate and which
contains the name of the person or group chairman responsible for the erection
and removal of the sign.
Portable Sign - Any sign not permanently attached to the ground or other
permanent structure, or a sign designed to be transported, including, but not
limited to, signs designed to be transported by means of wheels, signs converted
to A- or T-frames; menu and sandwich board signs; umbrellas used for
advertising; and signs attached to or painted on vehicles parked and visible from
the public right of way, unless said vehicle is used in the normal day-to-day
operations of the business.
Setback - The minimum horizontal distance between a lot line and a building line
or use.
Sign - The term "Sign" shall mean a name, identification, description, display,
illustration structure or device which is affixed to, or painted on, or represented
directly or indirectly upon a building or other outdoor surface or piece of land, and
which directs attention to an object, product, place, activity, person, institution,
organization or business.
Sign Area - The entire area within a continuous perimeter enclosing a sign,
exclusive of sign embellishments, which may extend beyond said perimeter as
regulated herein; such perimeter shall not include any structural elements lying
outside of said sign and is not an integral part of the display. Double-faced signs
are permitted with the maximum square footage allowed on each face as that
allowed for a single face sign; multi-faced sign areas may not exceed the area
permitted for a single faced sign.
Sign Height - Height shall be measured from grade to the uppermost points or
level of sign surface.
Temporary Sign - A sign that is not permanently affixed. All devices such as
banners, pennants, flags (not intended to include flags of any nations)
searchlights, twirling or sandwich type signs, sidewalk or curb signs and balloons
or other air or gas filled figures.
Wall Advertising Sign - An advertising sign attached to or erected against the
wall of a building or structure with the exposed face to the sign in a plane
approximately parallel to .the face of said wall and extending not more than fifteen
(15) inches from the building wall face.
Window Sign - A sign affixed to or inside a window in view of the general public,
but excluding merchandise on display.
DIVISION 15: General Reaulations
A. Signs are prohibited within the public right-of-way or
easements except that the City Council may grant a Special
Page 3 of 11
Effective - -01
City of Centerville Ordinance #39
Use Permit to locate signs and decorations on or within the
right-of-way for a specified period of time.
B. Flashing signs, motion signs or similar devices shall be
prohibited in all districts except commercial district signs that
meet the criteria detailed in the commercial district
standards. Approved traffic signs are exempt from this
provision.
c. Unless specifically allowed in this Ordinance, interior
illuminated signs are permitted in all districts except
Residential. All illuminated signs shall have a shielded light
source.
D. Business signs shall not be painted, attached, or in any
manner affixed to trees, rocks or similar natural surfaces.
No signs of any type shall be painted directly on to the roof
or the sides of a building.
E. Signs that interfere with the ability of vehicle operators or
pedestrians to see traffic signals, or which impede the vision
of traffic by vehicle operators or pedestrians are prohibited.
F. Signs shall not project above the roofline of any structure
without the issuance of a Special Use Permit.
G. No sign shall physically obstruct any window, fire escape or
opening intended to provide entry or exit to any structure or
building or public way.
H. All signs and sign structures shall be properly maintained in
a safe, orderly condition at all times, including the
replacement of defective parts, cleaning and other items
required for the maintenance of the sign. Vegetation within
ten feet in any direction of the base of ground signs shall be
neatly trimmed and free of weeds, and no rubbish or debris
that would constitute a fire or health hazard shall be
permitted under or near the sign.
I. No signs may be placed on utility poles in the community.
J. There may be no more than one identical sign per lot in a
residentially zoned area.
K. The changing of the advertising message of a painted or
printed sign, or changeable copy sign, and the painting,
repainting and cleaning of signs will not require a sign
permit, but will otherwise be done in compliance with this
Ordinance and any other applicable laws.
Page 4 of 11
Effective - -01
City ofCenterville Ordinance #39
L. No sign may by reason of its location, color or intensity,
create a hazard to the safe and efficient movement of
vehicles or pedestrian traffic. No private sign may contain
words that might be construed as traffic controls, such as
"Stop", "Caution", "Warning", or otherwise resemble any
official marker erected by a governmental body or agency,
unless such sign is a directional sign.
DIVISION 20: Permitted sians with no permit reauired
Section 020-010: Political Signs. Political signs posted by bona fide
candidates for political office or by a person or group promoting a political issue
for a candidate may be placed in any district subject to the requirements of the
district. Campaign signs may be posted for a period not to exceed sixty (60)
days and shall be removed within seven (7) days following the date of the
election. Only one sign (1) per candidate will be allowed per lot.
Section 020-020: Temporary Signs.
A. Temporary banners and pennants employed for grand
openings, special events and holidays shall be removed
within fourteen (14) days after such an opening, event or
holiday. Banners or pennants determined to be an integral
part of the design or architecture of a building are permitted.
B. One temporary identification sign, setting forth the name of
the project, architect, engineers, contractors, planners and
financing agencies, may be installed at a construction site in
any district for the period of construction. The sign area of a
temporary identification sign shall not exceed thirty-five (35)
square feet.
C. In any district, one temporary real estate sign may be
erected for the purpose of advertising the lease or sale of
property upon which it is placed. Only one such sign shall
be permitted per street frontage. Such sign(s) shall be
removed within seven (7) days following the lease or sale of
the property. The maximum size of such signs for each
district is as follows:
Residential Districts - Ten (10) square feet
Commercial District - Thirty-two (32) square feet
Industrial District - Thirty-two (32) square feet
Mixed-Use District - Sixteen (16) square feet
Agricultural/Rural Residential. Thirty-two (32) square feet
D. Signs pertaining to drives or events of civic, philanthropic,
educational or religious organizations, provided permission
Page 5 of 11
~
Effective - -01
City of Centerville Ordinance #39
of the Council must be obtained to erect such signs upon or
over public property and provided further that such signs
shall not be erected or posted for a period of more than
fourteen (14) days prior to the date of the event and must be
removed within three (3) days after the event.
Section 020-030: Directional Signs. Directional signs having a surface area
not greater than five (5) square feet.
Section 020-040: Memorial Signs. Memorial signs or tablets, or names of
buildings and date of erection when cut into a masonry surface of constructed of
metal, wood or stone and attached to the building not exceeding a sign surface
area of four (4) square feet.
Section 020-050: Freestanding Signs. Freestanding signs for garage sales or
similar events occurring within the corporate limits of the City, not exceeding four
(4) square feet in sign surface area, erected on private property with permission
of the landowner, and displayed for not more than three (3) consecutive days.
Section 020-060: Window Signs. Temporary or permanent window signs duly
authorized by zoning and other laws of this City, provided that all such signs on a
frontage shall not have a total sign surface area greater than 50% of the glass
area, excluding doors, on such frontage and provided that a minimum of one-half
of the open window space must be below a horizontal line which is five (5) feet
above the interior floor of the commercial establishment. Merchandise displays
in windows shall not be considered a part of the sign area if such display is not to
be continued for a period of more than eight (8) weeks.
DIVISION 25: Portable Signs
Portable signs are prohibited in residential districts. Portable signs in all other
districts are allowed with permit as specifically authorized below. Portable signs
used for the purpose of directing the public will be permitted subject to the
following conditions:
A. Said sign is coincidental to or used in conjunction with a
public function; and
B. Said sign is used for a special business promotion or event;
and
C. The period of use for such a sign shall not exceed fourteen
(14) consecutive days; and
D. No business may have more than six (6) special promotions
or events per year; and
E. Portable signs may not exceed eighty (80) square feet.
Page 6 of 11
Effective - -01
City of Centerville Ordinance #39
DIVISION 30: District Regulations
Section 030 - 010: Residential/Public Districts (R1 ,R2, R2A, R4, RS, P1)
Permitted Signs
A. Residential Identifications - Not more than two (2) square
feet per nameplate or six (6) square feet in area for each
multiple-family building.
B. Institutional Identifications - Churches, schools, parks etc.
allowed up to thirty-two (32) square feet; not taller than eight
(8) feet.
C. Business Signs - Home-based businesses may have a sign
that is no larger than four (4) square feet. Home-based
businesses that have frontage on a County Road may have
a free-standing or wall sign no taller than eight (8) feet from
grade and no larger than twenty-four (24) square feet. The
sign may not be an interior-illuminated sign.
Section 030 - 020: Commercial District (B1)
Permitted Signs
A. Wall Signs - Wall signs are permitted on each public street
exposure or public parking exposure provided said signage
does not exceed ten percent (10%) of said wall area.
B. Free Standing Signs - One (1) free standing sign per
business or business complex provided, however, said sign
does not exceed two hundred (200) square feet in area and
thirty-five (35) feet in height.
C. Area Identification Signs - One (1) area identification sign
is permitted per street frontage, however said sign does not
exceed sixty four (64) square feet in area and twenty (20)
feet in height, and is not placed within ten (10) feet of any
street right-of-way.
Section 030-030: Industrial District (11)
Permitted Signs
A. Wall Signs - Wall signs are permitted on each public street
exposure or public parking exposure provided said signage
does not exceed ten percent (10%) of said wall area.
B. Free Standing Signs - One (1) free standing sign per street
frontage provided, however, said sign does not exceed two
hundred (200) square feet in area and thirty-five (35) feet in
height.
Page 7 of 11
Effective - -01
City ofCenterville Ordinance #39
c. Area Identification Signs - One (1) area identification sign
is permitted per street frontage, however said sign does not
exceed sixty four (64) square feet in area and twenty (20)
feet in height, and is not placed within ten (10) feet of any
street right-of-way.
Section 030-040: Mixed-Use District (M1)
Permitted Signs
A. Wall Signs - Wall signs are permitted on each public street
exposure or public parking exposure provided said signage
does not exceed ten percent (10%) of said wall area.
B. Canopy Signs - Signs on these structures are allowed as
long as the sign area does not exceed ten percent (10%) of
said wall area.
C. Ground Signs - One (1) ground sign is permitted per street
frontage; however, said sign does not exceed eight (8) feet
in height and thirty-two (32) feet in area.
DIVISION 35: ComDrehensive SiQn Plan Required
A comprehensive sign plan is required at the time of Planning and Zoning
Commission review of any proposed new commercial or industrial development.
Said plan shall indicate the location, size, height, color, lighting and orientation of
all proposed signs and shall be submitted for approval pursuant to the
regulations of the City of Centerville.
Building permits and inspections are necessary as required by building and
electrical code. Fees for required permits or hearings shall be set by approved
annual resolution of the City Council.
Section 035-010: Application for Permit. Every application for a sign permit
must be accompanied by a plan drawn to scale and including the following:
A. The dimensions of the sign and where applicable the
dimensions of the wall surface of the building to which it is to
be attached.
B. The maximum and minimum height of the sign.
C. The proposed location of the sign in relation to the
boundaries of the lot upon which it is to be situated.
D. The proposed location of the sign in relation to the
boundaries of the lot upon which it is to be situated.
Page 8 of 11
Effective - -01
City ofCenterville Ordinance #39
E. If the sign is to be illuminated, the technical means by which
this is to be accomplished and the hours of illumination.
F. Where the sign is to be attached to any existing building, a
diagram or photograph of the face of the building to which
the sign is to be attached.
G. The name and address of the owner of the sign and the
address of the property where the sign is located.
H. Where a ground level sign is proposed with berming, a
diagram showing grade level and dimensions of the berm.
I. When a multi-tenant comprehensive sign plan is submitted,
the plan must include the location, size, height, color lighting
and orientation of all signs.
J. Where a ground sign plan is submitted, the plan must
include the location of the sign in relation to the lot lines and
the building height, including any difference from the
established grade, size, color, lighting and hours of
illumination.
DIVISION 40: Adiustments and Appeals
The commission of adjustments and appeals will be comprised by all members of
the Planning and Zoning Committee. The Planning and Zoning Committee will
hear and make recommendations to the City Council regarding:
A. Appeals where it is alleged that there is an error in any
order, requirement, decision or determination made by an
administrative officer in the City in the enforcement of this
Ordinance.
B. Petitions for variances from the literal provIsions of this
Ordinance in instances where their strict enforcement would
cause hardship because of circumstances unique to the
individual property under consideration. Criteria for granting
a variance will be the same as the criteria for granting a
variance in the City's zoning ordinance.
DIVISION 45: Non-Conformino Sions
Section 045-010: Legal, Conforming. All signs existing as of the adoption date
of this ordinance conforming to the requirements of this ordinance and not
requiring a permit under the provisions of this ordinance, may be maintained so
long as the sign continues to comply with the provisions of this ordinance, as it
may from time to time be amended.
Page 9 of 11
Effective - -01
City of Centerville Ordinance #39
Section 045-020: Legal, Non-Conforming, Signs. All signs existing as of the
adoption date of this ordinance which would be prohibited by ordinance or which
would require a permit under this ordinance but have not received a permit, will
be deemed to be legal non-conforming signs. Legal non-conforming signs may
continue to exist without a permit and without constituting a violation of this
ordinance until one or more of the following occurs:
A. The sign is structurally altered (except for normal
maintenance) in a way that makes the sign less in
compliance with this ordinance than it was before the
alteration.
8. The sign is relocated to a position making it less in
compliance with this ordinance than it was before the
relocation.
C. The sign is replaced.
D. Any new primary sign is erected or placed in connection with
the enterprise using the legal non-conforming sign.
DIVISION 50: Enforcement
If a sign is in violation of this ordinance, or is in danger of falling, or is otherwise a
menace to the safety of persons or property, the Building Official may give to the
owner of the property on which the sign is located, written notice specifying the
violation, ordering the cessation of the violation and requiring either the removal
of the sign or remedial work in the time and manner specified in the notice. In
the event of failure to comply with the notice within thirty (30) days, the Building
Official may remove the sign or cause such remedial work to be done. The cost
of the work performed by the City, must be paid to the City by the owner of the
property on which the sign is located. If payment is not made within thirty (30)
days after a statement of costs is sent to the owner, the costs may be assessed
against the property by certifying the costs to the County. If a sign that has been
removed is not reclaimed and costs paid within thirty (30) days after its removal,
the sign may be sold or otherwise disposed of by the City. If a sign is found to be
an immediate danger to the public because of its unsafe condition, it may be
removed without notice, and written notice of removal and reasons for the
removal will be given to the owner of the property on which the sign is located as
soon as possible.
Page 10 of 11
Effective - -01
City of Centerville Ordinance #39
DIVISION 55: EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall take effect the day
following the second publication in the city's official newspaper.
Mayor Tim Swedberg
Attest:
City Administrator
Page 11 of 11
..
. '. I '1
~: ~ - '
, ".," ',:- "':
- : - - - j: . . . , , ' : ~ ' ,.
",' :i'. --, ;'-' :.,
:,1"'. .,<"j '.:. "
{i :. :'1 :} ~,.j.1
. ...,.. , .
';, ')';!
TO: All Committees/Commissions
FROM: Jim March
SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and Council Members Attendance
DATE: February 2, 2001
The Honorable Mayor and Council Members will be attending all committee/commission
meetings scheduled in the month of February.
Council would like to take this opportunity to meet you and get acquainted. Council feels
that effective communications between committee/commission members will aid in
obtaining goals for the future.
Council would like to share their goals, objectives and visions with you and allow you an
opportunity to do the same,
Council anticipates meeting with you.
Me
, ~....,
V1...
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Jim March
SUBJECT: Mini-Storage
DATE: February 2, 2001
On two occasions individuals, (one being Mr. Sager), have contacted Staff in regards to
constructing a Mini-Storage facility within the community. Currently, Ordinance #4 does
not address this type of business.
Mr. Sager will be appearing to discuss a proposed facility; however, prior to any action in
regards to Mr. Sager's proposal, the Commission needs to consider amending Ordinance
#4 to include Mini-Storage facilities as Permitted Uses for the Industrial (I-I) zoning
district or create a new district which addresses same.
It is my understanding that several members of the commission have spoken with Mr.
Sager in regards to his proposed Mini-Storage facility. On Tuesday, I spoke with Mr.
Sager in regards to the zoning issues and how same may affect his proposal.
..
MEMO
DATE: February I, 2001
TO : Planning and Zoning Connnission
FROM: Jim March
RE : Site Plan Review Checklist
............................................................................
Included in your packet is a copy of the site plan review checklist that I have put together
in a rough draft. This document is for review and discussion. Council would like to have
the Planning and Zoning Connnission conduct formal and complete site plan reviews
prior to the developer being allowed to come forward for Council review. I am hoping
this checklist can be developed as a tool for the staff, Council and Committee to use to
ensure that the proposed development has been thoroughly reviewed for compliance with
City Ordinances.
Draft
SITE PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
The following items need to be submitted to and reviewed by City Staff. It is advised
that early in the plHnnine process, potential developers request a joint meeting with the
City Administrator, Building OfficiaI/Public Works Director, City Engineer and Fire
Chief so that early communication can occur to relay expectations and timelines for the
review process.
Information needs to be submitted for staff review at least two weeks prior to the date of
notice for the public hearing to be held at the Planning and Zoning Commission.
YES ID!
ZONING CORRECT
MEETS MINIMUM BUILDING SIZE
MEETS SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
APPROVED USE IN ZONING DISTRICT
BOUNDARY SURVEY OF PARCEL INCLUDING
IDENTIFICATION OF ALL MONUMENTS
SCALED LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES,
DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS, TRAILS, DETERMINATION
OF NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS AND CURBING
SCALED LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
UTILITIES AND EASEMENTS
SCALED DEPICTIONS OF FLOOR PLANS FOR EACH
STORY
SCALED DEPICTIONS OF EACH BUILDING ELEVATION
AND DESCRIPTIONS OF EXTERIOR BUILDING
MATERIALS AND COLOR SCHEMES
SCALED SITE GRADING PLANS, INCLUDING EROSION
AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MECHANISMS AND
PROCEDURES
SCALED DELINEATIONS OF ANY SHORELAND,
FLOODPLAIN OR WETLAND AREAS ON THE SITE
IDENTIFICATION OF ANY FLOODPLAIN OR WETLAND
ENCROACHMENTS AND DETAILED MITIGATION
PLANS
DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLANS, ILLUSTRATING SIZE,
TYPES AND LOCATIONS OF ALL MATERIALS, A
DESCRIPTION OF SITE SEEDING OR SODDING, A
DESCRIPTION OF THE TIMETABLE FOR SITE
LANDSCAPING AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF ANY
IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
DETAILED DESCRIPTIONS OF ANY SITE FENCING,
INCLUDING TYPE, LOCATION AND HEIGIIT
All plans shall be dated and bear the preparer(s) name(s), including professional
registrations or certifications when appropriate or required.
If all of the above items are met and approved by staff review, then the developer will be
scheduled to appear before the Park and Recreation Committee (if applicable) and the
Planning and Zoning Committee. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the developer
for additional information.
COMMITTEE REVIEW
PARK AND RECREATION
DATE
This review is only required if the proposed development will be adjacent to a current or
future trail segment as delineated in the approved comprehensive park plan or the
proposed development will be adjacent to a current or future park as delineated by the
comprehensive park plan.
PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE
This review will require a public hearing and the Planning and Zoning Committee will
review all of the above items for approval and recommendation to Council. Council
requests that if the above items are not submitted to the Planning and Zoning Committee
for approval, then the request should be tabled or denied until there has been a complete
review by the Committee.
. Additional plan review requirements may be necessary for building permit
approval based upon any special requirements of the building or :fire code.
CITY COUNCIL
DATE
Special conditions to be placed on the developer in the form of a written agreement with
the City of Centerville
,
.
.
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
PLANING AND ZONING COMMISSION
JANUARY 2, 2001
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission held their r gu
scheduled meeting on January 2, 2001, at 6:30 p. m.
PRESENT:
Commission Member Alan LaMotte
Commission Member David Kilian
Commission Member Rob Sheppard
Commission Member John McLean
Commission Member Ray DeVine
Commission Member Brian Hanson
o
ABSENT:
Barry Brainard
COUNCIL:
d Vickers
STAFF:
I.
CALL TO
ER
wa calle t r er at 4 .m.
to Il Request -7007 - 20th Avenue
d stated he would like to have the property
r Mar h explained the property in question is a pizza shaped piece of property with a
si ent' I structure on the west edge of the property and a pole barn currently being used
fi r usiness on the other side. The pole barn has been used for a business for
a proximately 30 years.
Mr. & Mrs. Yaeger are building a house on Lot 14 across the street from the property of
concern, questioned whether the property will remain as is or if the tenant has plans to
expand the business and if the property is rezoned to Industrial would residents have
input into usage of the property?
Chairperson Hanson indicated there were several allowed uses for property that is zoned
Industrial. He then read the list to Mr. & Mrs. Yaeger.
Page I of 10
~
Mr. March explained due to the property being located near the creek and the size of the
parcel some of the allowed uses for industrial property would not be allowed. He then
explained that the pole building would not be allowed to be reconstructed in the event of
destruction by a natural disaster.
Mrs. Yaeger expressed her concerns for truck traffic, diesel fuel smells and chemical
smells if the property is rezoned to Industrial and the use of the property changes.
Ms. Karen Maska, Brian Court, stated she believed she was building a house in a
residential neighborhood and would not have built her home in that location if she were
aware that the parcel would be rezoned to Industrial. She is very concerned that
something louder, smellier and more disruptive to the neighborhood would come in
should the property be rezoned to Industrial.
Mr. Mark Radley, 7044 Cottonwood Court, questioned the need fOr a rezone to Industrial
if the intention is to keep the same type of business there. He then asked the Commission
to consider the fact that this parcel is bordered on three sides by property zone
Residential.
Mrs. Stevens presented her tax statement to Chairperson Hanson, which indicated she is
currently taxed Residential and Commercial for the property.
Mr. March noted the property owner is requesting the entire parcel be rezoned to
Industrial. The property owner had considered splitting the property, however, there is
no buildable area on the portion with the pole bam due to the floodway. The current
tenant would like to continue to use the entire piece of property and can continue to
operate the business under a Special Use Permit.
Ms. Maska questioned how residents or the City could control the use of the property in
the future. Mr. March indicated any new business would need a Special Use Permit,
which would require a public hearing to inform residents and receive resident input.
Mrs. Yaeger questioned whether there was a difference in which businesses could be
located on the property if the parcel was zoned Commercial, rather than Industrial.
Chairperson Hanson stated there were different businesses allowed under Commercial,
rather than Industrial.
Mrs. Yaeger questioned whether it was possible to split the parcel and leave the portion
of the lot with the house on it Residential and zone the other Commercial.
The Stevens indicated they did not have a preference either way for zoning but had
received a request from the buyer of the property to request a rezone to Industrial as a
condition of the sale.
Mr. March explained the business could continue to operate as is under the currently
issued Special Use Permit if the zoning remains the same. If the buyer of the property
should want to redevelop in the future, rezoning to Industrial would be required.
Page 2 of 10
Mr. Yaeger questioned the submittal of the rezone and who requested same; the City, the
property owner, or the buyer of the property. Mr. March explained the business currently
operating out of the pole barn is non-conforming but would be allowed to continue
operating under the Special Use Permit without a rezone to Industrial. Mr. March stated
he was not privy to the terms of the sale but suggested the buyer may have requested the
rezone to make the property more saleable in the future or perhaps it was requested by the
financing institution. Mr. March stated he was not sure whether the rezone to Industrial
affected the sale of the property.
Mrs. Stevens indicated the rezone to Industrial would affect the sale of the property. Mrs.
Stevens indicated she has been paying Commercial taxes for a number of years and
believes she is entitled to the rezone. Mr. March explained that Anoka County taxes
property at the highest use rate allowed and due to the fact there is a business operating
out of the pole barn, Mrs. Stevens is being taxed Commercially on the portion of the
property regardless of the zoning designation by the City, which is Residential.
Mr. March stated if the property is not rezoned the business will be allowed to continue
to operate under the currently issued Special Use Permit. The City cannot revoke the
Special Use Permit unless the business is found to be in violation of the conditions of
same.
Ms. Chris Swenson, 7016 Brian Court, explained to Council she had researched the area
and believed the area to be a residential development. She expressed concern for future
use of the property should the rezone to Industrial be granted. Ms. Swenson stated she
did not believe an industrial use for the property was appropriate or safe for the
neighborhood.
Ms. Maska expressed concern for the impact on the neighborhood if an industrial use for
the property is approved. Ms. Maska stated she was concerned for property values and
resale of the homes in the neighborhood if there is an industrial property in the
neighborhood.
Mrs. Yaeger questioned whether there were trucks parked at the building. She then
suggested the parcel be split and the portion with the pole building be zoned Commercial
or be issued a Special Use Permit. She also suggested requiring the buyer to install some
type of screening.
Mr. March noted the tenant did not appear too concerned for the type of zoning of the
parcel provided the Special Use Permit would allow him to continue to operate his
business. Mr. March explained the building is non-conforming structure and, therefore,
could not be rebuilt should it be destroyed by a natural disaster.
Mr. Dave Luke, 7026 Brian Court, questioned whether the pole building conformed to
the requirements of an industrial building. Commissioner LaMotte indicated the building
did not conform to Industrial requirements and was being "grandfathered in" under
Commercial requirements. Mr. March explained the building did not comply with any
requirements at this point and is classified as non-conforming under City code.
Mr. Don Moe, 7480 Brian Court, addressed the Commission and indicated that at the.
time he and his neighbors decided to build their homes, they researched the City's
Page 3 oflO
Comprehensive Plan to confirm the area was zoned Residential. The City has a
responsibility to follow the Comprehensive developed. The City also has a responsibility
to the community at large to regulate zoning to protect property values. The City has a
designated industrial area and this area is not included in same.
Mr. Stevens indicated he thought the parcel was zoned Industrial just as the rest of the
property along 20th Avenue.
Chairperson Hanson explained the east side of 20th A venue is zoned Industrial and the
west side of 20th A venue is zoned Commercial.
Commissioner Kilian stated that a small portion of the property appears to be Industrial
and the remainder Residential.
Ms. Swenson indicated residents did research the City's Comprehensive Plan and the
entire area is zoned Residential and she would like it to remain that way.
Mr. March explained due to the shape and size of the property, and the floodway issues a
business owner looking for a piece of industrial property would not consider this parcel
when it would be easier to build in the industrial park. Mr. March explained even if the
rezone is granted it would be highly unlikely the use of the property would change.
Mr. Luke explained he used to live behind the Buckbee's and had a nice natural view and
would never have purchased this current property if he knew it could possibly have a
view of a piece of property zoned Industrial.
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers explained that even though the City has a
Comprehensive Plan as residents have mentioned the potential is always there that a
property owner can request to have their property zoning designation modified. This
request has come from the property owner not the City. The City does not control
requests or zoning modifications and the property owners are entitled to the public
hearing concerning the request.
Ms. Swenson indicated she believed she was building next to property zoned Residential
not Commercial and the Comprehensive Plan is the reason she believed that. She also
noted if the property owners request the rezone, again she will be back to contest it.
Mr. Moe stated, with due respect, to Council Liaison Broussard Vickers, the City does
have a responsibility to follow its Comprehensive Plan which sets out the vision for the
community. He stated he understood that a portion of the property can be rezoned but
feels the City Comprehensive Plan and resident input indicate the parcel should remain
residential. Mr. Moe then inquired as to the motivation for the request. Is the business
owner planning on expanding the asphalt company?
Ms. Maska expressed displeasure with the comments of Council Liaison Broussard
Vickers, indicating she felt she was reprimanded for opposing the rezone, which she did
not feel was appropriate. Ms. Maska stated that several residents wishes were to deny the
request to rezone this parcel and felt that due to same, the City should deny the request.
Page 4 of 10
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers clarified her comments indicating she was simply
trying to clarifY for residents that this rezone request did not come from the City and that
any property owner is entitled to request a rezoning of their property.
Mr. Radley stated residents oppose the current use of the property but if the property is
rezoned to Industrial, it would pose a problem for the neighborhood.
Mr. Lloyd Drilling, 7185 Mound Trail, stated that since it appears no one is directly
adjacent to the pole building perhaps a 50/50 split zoning would be appropriate.
Mrs. Yaeger indicated the home she is building will be facing the pole building.
Mr. Yaeger questioned the rezoning since the buyer has indicated he does not intend to
change the use of the property.
Mrs. Stevens indicated she would like at least the part of the property she is paying
Commercial taxes on rezoned to Commercial.
Motion bv Commissioner DeVine, seconded bv Commissioner SheDDard to close the
DubUc hearinl!:. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Chairperson Hanson closed the public hearing at 7: 15 p.m.
2. Lloyd Drilling (Site Plan)
Chairperson Hanson opened the public hearing at 7:15 p.m.
Mr. Drilling gave a brief overview of the proposed 10,000 square foot strip mall to be
located at 1873 Main Street. Mr. Drilling provided a blueprint drawing for review.
Mr. Jeff Turner, 7151 Peterson Trail, expressed concern for increased traffic onto
Peterson Trail and said he would prefer to split the traffic by adding a driveway onto the
Shad Avenue side of the strip mall.
Commissioner Kilian explained at the public hearing for the rezoning of the property,
many residents from the Shad Avenue expressed concern for traffic and lights shining
into a residential windows ifthere was an entrance on Shad Avenue.
Mr. Turner stated he believed adding the potential for 100 more cars onto Peterson Trail
is a safety hazard as there are no stop signs.
Commissioner Kilian stated that he felt there was no way to accommodate a driveway
onto Shad Avenue.
Mrs. Yaeger questioned whether a wider entrance/exit onto Main Street would alleviate
some of the traffic problems. Mr. Drilling indicated the County has specific requirements
for width of access onto a County road. He also explained there needs to be an driveway
on Peterson Trail to move traffic from one strip mall to the other without having people
exit onto Main Street to move between shopping areas.
Page 5 of 10
Mr. Drilling sympathized with Mr. Turner's concern for increased traffic, but indicated
he did not believe the present strip mall had negatively impacted the neighborhood as it
does not generate that much traffic. The proposed strip mall would generate additional
traffic minimally.
Mr. Turner stated that currently one (1) stop sign is installed at the intersection of
Peterson Trail and Main Street. Mr. Turner felt that it would not take people long to
figure out that they can go up Peterson Trail to avoid tie ups at Main Street and Peterson
Trail. Mr. Turner stated he did not have a problem with tearing the old house down and
zoning it Commercial but he does have a problem with increased traffic on Peterson
Trail. It appears to him that a plan is developed and then changed at the last minute.
Mr. Drilling indicated there was a public hearing to take resident input held at a previous
meeting, which is where it was learned there would be a problem putting a driveway on
the Shad A venue side. Mr. Turner indicated he did not have notice of that public hearing.
Mr. Turner thanked Mr. Drilling for his efforts to appease the neighborhood during the
construction of his first building. Mr. Turner again expressed concern for increased
traffic on Peterson Trail and requested an alternative. Mr. Turner requested that the
County be contacted to ascertain the possibility of a wider access onto Main Street rather
than the option proposed.
Mr. March stated there may be a trail crossing the property and a wider access onto Main
Street with an island of some sort between the entrance and exit lanes would be a nice
safety feature for bikers and walkers.
Mr. Turner questioned whether Mr. Drilling intended to have fencing or some type of
screening from neighboring homes.
Mr. March asked Chairperson Hanson to have Mr. Drilling explain some of the
comments and suggestions that came out of the previous public hearing and have been
incorporate into his plan.
Mr. Drilling indicated there would be a berm along the backside of the property with a
six (6) or eight (8) foot fence that would effectively screen the building.
Mr. Turner questioned whether the building would be set back off the property line far
enough to allow for maintenance to the building without having to trespass onto
neighboring properties. Mr. Drilling concurred.
Motion bv Commissioner Kilian. seconded by Commissioner DeVine to close the
public hearinl!. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Chairperson Hanson closed the public hearing at 7:40 p.m.
3. Ordinance #39 - Sil!ll
Chairperson Hanson opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m.
Page 6 of 10
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated that Council had received a request for
clarification to the sign ordinance. There was no opposition expressed except
clarification to the commercial business section being too restrictive.
Chairperson Hanson explained the Planning and Zoning Commission held several
workshops where modifications to the sign ordinance were discussed. Height, overall
signs, type of construction, and lighting were all taken into consideration.
Motion by Commissioner Sheppard. seconded bv Commissioner Kilian to close the
{Iublic hearinl!. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Chairperson Hanson closed the public hearing at 7:43 p.m.
4. Proposed Amendments to Ordinance #4
Chairperson Hanson opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m.
Mr. March explained the need for the public hearing to discuss amendments to Ordinance
#4. Ordinance #4 currently does not allow for specific home styles due to minimum
footprint requirements. There is a new definition for front yards and a recommendation
to set a minimum footprint or minimum finished square footage of 1,650 square feet.
Mr. Turner inquired if under current code someone would be allowed to build a split level
home with 1,000 finished square feet on the main level and 440 finished square feet over
the garage, but leave the basement unfinished. Mr. March indicated that would not be
allowed. Mr. Turner expressed concern for requiring 1,650 finished square feet as that
seemed like a large amount and may be cost prohibitive for the average person. Mr.
March explained this requirement would be for new construction in new development
areas, not current neighborhoods.
Mr. Palzer stated he believed a lot of people were having trouble meeting the 900 - 1,200
square foot minimum footprint and the changes to the ordinance would be less restrictive
than current requirements.
Commissioner DeVine explained the City is attempting to protect property values by
controlling finished square footage. This will keep a small house from being built next to
a large house.
Mr. Turner questioned if there was a minimum house price based on lot size. Mr. March
explained the City does not regulate house price based on lot size, however, some
subdivisions have their own requirements. Mr. March explained the City is attempting to
maintain equitable property values.
Mr. Don Anderson, 9313 Deer Pass, explained he has a purchase agreement to build a
home and the type of home he wants to build is not allowed. He would be allowed to
build a 1,200 square foot house on a slab but not a 2,400 finished square foot, modified
two-story. He thanked the Commission for their consideration of this matter.
Mr. March stated the current ordinance was passed when the City was being inundated
with the two-level, split.
Page 7 oflO
Motion bv Commissioner DeVine. seconded bv Commissioner Sheppard to close the
public hearinl!. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Chairperson Hanson closed the public hearing at 7:50 p.m.
III. APPEARANCES
None.
IV. OLD BUSINESS
None.
V. NEW BUSINESS
I. Joyce A. Stevens - Rezone from R2 to II Request 7007 - 20th A venue
Commissioner Kilian stated he did not feel a rezone to Industrial would be appropriate
due to the fact the property is surrounded by residential property.
Commissioner McLean stated it was discussed earlier that the business owner could
continue to operate without rezoning to Industrial. This may affect the sale but perhaps
something could be worked out between buyer and seller.
Chairperson Hanson expressed concern that the City use caution to avoid spot zoning.
The current use of the property works within the residential neighborhood but a rezone to
industrial could bring another type of use.
Motion bv Commissioner Shepoard, seconded bv Commissioner McLean to deny
the requested rezone. All in favor. Motion carried nnanimonslv.
2. Lloyd Drilling - Site Plan
Chairperson Hanson questioned whether there would be grass or asphalt behind the
building in the northwest corner. Mr. Drilling indicated there may be overflow parking
and grass it has not yet been decided.
Commissioner Kilian expressed concern for the location of the dumpsters as that was a
concern raised by residents at the public hearing. Mr. Drilling indicated the exact
location has not been determined and he is open to City input.
Commissioner Sheppard questioned the length of the current strip mall comparative to
the proposed strip mall. Mr. Drilling indicated the current strip mall is 220 feet long and
55 feet wide and the proposed strip mall is 250 feet long and 40 feet wide.
Commissioner Kilian questioned the type of exterior building materials. Mr. Drilling
indicated the building would be brick and/or cut block and siding. The building is quite
long and he is attempting to make it more appealing.
Page 8 of 10
Chairperson Hanson questioned whether there has been a traffic study on Peterson Trail
lately. Mr. March indicated there has not. The procedure is residents need to request a
traffic study before one is conducted.
Mr. Drilling indicated there was a definite need for a driveway on the Peterson Trail side
of the building and said the entrance onto Main Street can be as wide as allowed by the
Anoka County.
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers asked Commissioner DeVine how he gets home ifhe
is traveling west on Main Street. Commissioner DeVine indicated he uses Peterson Trail.
Mr. Drilling noted Peterson Trail was designed as a collector street.
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers stated she did not believe traffic would increase by a
large amount due to an addition of another strip mall as it seems many people are already
using it to travel north because it is a straight road with no stop signs.
Commissioner DeVine questioned whether the site plan could be approved with
contingencies. Mr. March noted the site plan would not be approved at the Council level
without Mr. Drilling providing much more detail concerning the building. Mr. March
indicated the Planning and Zoning Commission may want to consider tabling this item
until its next meeting.
Mr. Drilling indicated that tabling the matter would hinder the anticipated timeframe as
there were many changes at the Council level last time. He noted he would not be at the
next Council meeting as he needed time to prepare and provide details to Council for
reVIew.
Motion by Commissioner Kilian. seconded by Commissioner DeVine to recommend
to Council aooroval of the site olan as oresented. All in favor. Motion carried.
3. Chicilo Homes - Industrial Building (Lot 5, Royal Industrial Park)
Mr. March explained that there was not time to properly notice for a public hearing on
this matter for this evenings meeting so this is informational for the Commission.
Chairperson Hanson questioned the type of building Mr. Chicilo is proposing. Mr.
Chicilo indicated he is a residential homebuilder and intends to build an office/
warehouse type building. His business would occupy one fourth (1/4) of the building for
office and storage of miscellaneous items and lease the remaining three fourths (3/4).
Mr. Chicilo indicated he would like to break ground as soon as subsequent to obtaining
City approvaL
Motion by Commissioner DeVine, seconded by Commissioner McLean to
recommend to Council approval of the oroposed buildine as oresented. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimously.
4. Amendments to Ordinance #4
Page 9 of 10
Motion bv Commissioner DeVine. seconded bv Commissioner LaMotte to approve
the amendments to Ordinance #4 as presented. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
5. Ordinance #39 - Sign
Motion bv Commissioner Kilian. seconded by Commissioner Sheppard to approve
Ordinance #39 - the Sie:n Ordinance as presented. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS
None.
VII. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
1. December 5, 2000 Meeting Minutes
Motion bv Commissioner Sheppard. seconded bv Commissioner Kilian to approve
the December 5. 2000 Meetine: Minutes as presented. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
Motion bv Commissioner DeVine. seconded bv Commissioner McLean to adiourn
the January 2. 2001 Plannine: Commission Meetine: at 8:35 p.m. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimously.
Transcribed by:
Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
Proofed by:
Teresa Bender, Clerk Treasurer
Staff
Page 10 oflO
~
Forwarded to Council Members
Via e-mail on 2/1/01 at 2:46 p.m.
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY 24, 2001
6:00 p.m.
PRESENT: Mayor Tim Swedberg
Council Member Dick Travis
Council Member Mary Capra
Council Member Linda Broussard Vickers
Council Member Mari Nelson
o
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly sche
meeting on January 24, 2001, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street.
ABSENT:
None.
STAFF:
City Administrato ,
City Engineer, T
City Attorney, Ji
Public orks Di
r
I.
oune! meeting to order at 6:03 p.m.
I.
aste Management, was in attendance to
s ussed at the previous meeting.
a essed un il d expl in d that immediately upon receipt of the letter
r S 0 nberg r, he n a ed h to apologize and offered him one (I) month
s rv c 0 omp n ate hi r hi' convenience. Mr. Boium explained Waste
a e t is se 'ce busi es and they pride themselves on providing excellent
c r. Bo urn stated that aste Management is honored to handle Centerville's
epic p to show ho much customer service means to Waste Management.
Bbiu assured Council that any customer service issue would be addressed
dia ly.
. Boium stated that he was made aware of Council's request for a written response and
ill provide same if desired.
Council Member Nelson thanked Mr. Boium for his personal appearance and stated that a
written response was not necessary.
Page I of 14
Forwarded to Council Members
Via e-mail on 211101 at 2:46 p.m.
~
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded bv Council Member
Nelson to approve the al!:enda with the requested addition. All in favor. Motion
carried unanimouslv.
III. PUBLIC HEARING (8)
1. Lloyd Drilling
Mayor Swedberg opened the tabled public hearing from the previous meeting at 6:10
p.m.
Mr. Drilling submitted drawings of the site plan for the proposed strip mall to be located
at 1873 Main Street. The site plan showed the exterior colors of the building. Mr.
Drilling also submitted a picture of a sample fence to be used to house the garbage
receptacle. Mr. Drilling stated that the fence is to be chain link with screening. Mr.
Drilling also stated that the trailway would be built to County specifications as requested
by Council.
Mr. Drilling explained he would like to build a three (3) foot berm rather than the
previously discussed four (4) foot berm to aid in drainage and maintenance. There would
be a six (6) foot fence on top of the berm. Mr. Drilling expressed willingness to match
the northwest neighbor's fence if the neighbor desires.
Mr. Drilling showed pictures of the trees currently located on the site and indicated if the
County allows, the trees will remain in place; however, if the County requests that the
trees be moved, they will be moved to the northwest corner of the property. If the
County does not allow the trees to stay then five (5) or six (6) foot evergreens would be
installed on the site. Mr. Drilling explained that evergreens are a typical landscaping
tree.
Mr. Drilling stated the building would have an exterior, brick front with metal siding.
Council Member Capra questioned the location of the signs for the businesses. Mr.
Drilling stated that signage would be located along the front of the building in the three
(3) foot space provided. Signage would be handled similar to that of the current strip
mall.
Mayor Swedberg questioned the type of signage that would be installed. Mr. Drilling
stated that the current strip mall has uniform signage with the exception of the daycare.
Mr. Drilling explained that the type of retailer in the space typically dictates signage,
however, all signage would be backlit.
Mr. Peterson indicated Mr. Drilling has met the contingencies for the site plan as outlined
in Mr. Peterson's letter to the City.
Mr. Hoeft indicated final site plan approval needs to be subject to Mr.' Peterson's
approval and subject to an approved Developer's Agreement. Mayor Swedberg indicated
he would like to see deciduous trees placed in front of the building rather than
Page 2 of 14
L
Forwarded to Council Members
Via e-mail on 2/1/01 at 2:46 p.m.
evergreens. Mr. Drilling indicated he had spoken to a tree expert who had indicated it
was very hard to get deciduous trees to grow that close to Main Street due to the salt
spray. Mr. Drilling expressed a willingness to plant whatever type of tree Council
reqUires.
Council Member Capra questioned whether the trees located on the site would remain.
Mr. Drilling stated he would like to leave the evergreens and apple trees on the east side
of the property, but believes that Anoka County would request that they be removed.
Council Member Capra questioned whether there would be a fence and evergreens in the
northwest comer of the property. Mr. Drilling indicated there would be a fence and
evergreen trees.
Council Member Capra questioned the purpose of the submitted draft Developer's
Agreement. Mr. Hoeft explained it was a draft submitted by Staff to show Council the
language contained in a typical Developer's Agreement. Mr. March indicated the
document was provided for review and to become familiar with the language contained in
same.
Mr. Hoeft indicated Council would need to approve the Developer's Agreement. If
Council approves the site plan, Mr. Drilling has preliminary go ahead to move along in
the process with no construction until Council has approved a Developer's Agreement.
Mr. March indicated he spoken with Anoka County Highway Department and was
informed that they would allow a bituminous trail in its right-of-way. Mr. March stated
the County would allow the ditch to be filled, but reserves the right to review the culvert
subsequent to placement.
Mr. March stated that the City needs a written detail of landscaping plans in order to
assign a value to the landscaping to be included in the Developer's Agreement. Mr.
Drilling stated that the design of the building might change in regards to doors and
windows. Mr. March questioned the final determination of the building design and
explained that the City is concerned that the building will be constructed differently than
the submitted plans suggest.
Mr. March indicated the east and west elevations of the building are crucial in regards to
the appearance of the building. Mr. Drilling stated that he previously submitted
elevations at the last meeting and would be willing to resubmit same if Council desired.
Mr. Drilling stated that the drawings of the building would be modified slightly, if any.
Council Member Nelson stated she was disappointed that site plan information was not
contained in her packet for prior review. Mr. Drilling stated that he did not recall stating
that he would provide information to Council Members' homes and apologized for the
oversight. Mr. Drilling stated that he had attempted to address Council's concerns of the
previous meeting, such as exterior color of the building, trailways and fencing. Mr.
Drilling stated that if Council grants approval of the preliminary site plan, the remaining
requirements, that Council deemed appropriate, could be contained in the Developer's
Agreement.
Page 3 ofl4
Forwarded to Council Members
Via e-mail on 2/1/01 at 2:46 p.m.
Mr. Bruce Luikart, 7130 Peterson Trail, questioned the type of lighting in the rear of the
building. Mr. Drilling stated that the lighting would be similar to the current strip mall.
Mr. Luikart questioned whether the rear, exterior of the building would be brick. Mr.
Drilling concurred.
Mayor Swedberg questioned Mr. Luikart as to his thoughts of the proposed strip mall.
Mr. Luikart stated that he could live with the building.
Mr. Jerry Engler, 7127 Shad Avenue, requested that the berm run along the north/south
jog of the property. Mr. Drilling stated that he had not planned to have a berm in that
location. Mr. Drilling also stated that there would be a six (6) foot fence installed on the
top of the berm and trees would run north to south on the property line on the Drilling
side of the fence.
Mr. Peterson eXplained he was unable to comment on whether a berm along the
north/south jog would interfere with drainage, as he did not have a map with contours.
Mr. Engler asked Mr. Drilling if his trees and stakes would be replaced that were
removed by construction workers when the site was cleared. Mr. Drilling agreed to
restore Mr. Engler's property to its original state.
Mayor Swedberg requested that Mr. Hoeft investigate whether berming the north/south
jog would interfere with drainage.
Mr. Engler stated he desired the berm to be moved out to the west beyond where the
proposed fence is located.
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated that Mr. Engler's proposal was unacceptable
due to the separation of the berm and the fence. Council Member Broussard Vickers felt
that this would not be attractive.
Mr. March suggested waiting for Mr. Peterson's report on drainage prior to determining
whether a berm in the location would work.
Mr. Engler questioned the height of the trees that Mr. Drilling intended on installing. Mr.
March indicated Mr. Drilling needed to submit a detailed landscaping plan, which would
provide that information. Mr. Drilling indicated he would either leave the larger trees
currently located on the site or use five (5) or six (6) foot landscape evergreens dependent
upon County suggestion.
Mr. Engler asked that construction traffic not enter the lot from Shad Avenue.
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to close the public hearinl!. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Mayor Swedberg closed the public hearing at 6:50 p.m.
Page 4 of 14
Forwarded to Council Members
Via e-mail on 2/1/01 at 2:46 p.m.
2. Chicilo Homes
Mayor Swedberg opened the public hearing at 6:51 p.m.
Mr. Chicilo submitted plans for a proposed 12,000 square foot office/warehouse building
to be located in the industrial park.
Mayor Swedberg questioned the positioning of the building. Mr. Chicilo stated that the
building would face west. Mr. March indicated the building will face more south than
west and will be accessed from the north.
Council Member Nelson questioned the type of business that would occupy the building.
Mr. Chicilo indicated it would be small businesses such as himself who needed a small
amount of office space and the remaining space for warehouse use. Mr. Chicilo indicated
he has 25% of the building leased and he will occupy a portion of the building.
Council Member Capra thanked Mr. Chicilo for providing such detailed plans.
Mayor Swedberg questioned the use of a concrete dolly pad. Mr. Chicilo explained it is
used for semi-trucks to drop off their trailers to protect blacktop, which is not strong
enough to support the weight of a truck trailer.
Council Member Travis questioned whether the parking requirements would be met with
the submitted plans. Mr. Palzer indicated that Mr. Peterson would review the plans to
determine if modifications are needed. Mr. March indicated the City does not have a
standard parking requirement for warehouse facilities.
Mr. Hoeft indicated he has reviewed the written site plan approval drafted by staff and
made a minor change. Approval of the site plan would be contingent upon Mr.
Peterson's review and approval, contingent upon obtaining the required permits.
Motion bv Council Member Travis, seconded bv Council Member Nelson to close
the public hearin!!. AU in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Mayor Swedberg closed the public hearing at 7:00 p.m.
Motion bv Council Member Nelson, seconded bv Council Member Capra to
approve the site plan for Chicilo Homes subiect to the followin!! conditions: a) the
applicant shall obtain a Rice Creek Watershed District Permit, if applicable: b) the
applicant shall obtain all other required permits. Parkin!! lot desi!!n, site draina!!e
and !!radin!! plans must meet with the City En!!ineer's approval prior to issuance of
such permits: and c) the applicant agrees that the buildin!! and site amenities will be
constructed in accordance with the submitted site plan that was presented to
Council and is attached to the executed site plan approval document. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimouslv.
Page 5 of 14
Forwarded to Council Members
Via e-mail on 2/1101 at 2:46 p.m.
IV. APPEARANCES/AWARDS
This item was previously discussed.
V. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS
None.
VI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
VII. NEW BUSINESS
1. Chicilo Homes Site Plan Approval
This item was previously discussed.
2. Llovd Drilling Site Plan Approval
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated that Mr. Drilling needs to provide final details
on several issues, but is comfortable with the basic information provided concerning the
site plan. The final details should be addressed in the Developer's Agreement.
Council Member Capra questioned whether approval of the site plan would be giving Mr.
Drilling approval to commence construction on the building. Mr. Hoeft indicated site
plan approval is an approval to move forward with the planning process but construction
cannot start until Council approves the Developer's Agreement. Council's site plan
approval will be contingent upon an approved Developer's Agreement.
Council Member Capra questioned the time frame for finalizing the Developer's
Agreement. Mr. Hoeft stated that a draft Developer's Agreement would be presented at
their next meeting.
Council Member Capra questioned the reason for receiving two (2) totally different site
plans for approval. Mr. Drilling's plan was not as complete or detailed as Mr. Chicilo's
plan. Mr. Drilling explained that the Chicilo Homes site plan is very straightforward as it
is an industrial building being built in an industrial park. There is nothing about the plan
that is subject to resident or Council approval. Mr. Drilling stated that if he receives
approval of his site plan he will authorize the architects to prepare plans for Council that
provide as much or more information as provided by Mr. Chicilo.
Council Member Nelson requested that all information regarding this item be included in
the packet, prior to distribution and council meeting.
Council Member Travis stated he had no problem approving the site plan. He also stated
that he recently received his tax statement and believes the City needs to bring more
commercial development in to help with the tax base. In his opinion, Mr. Drilling has
Page 6 of 14
Forwarded to Council Members
Via e-mail on 2/1101 at 2:46 p.m.
done an excellent job of addressing resident and Council concerns. It is hard to develop
commercial property adjacent to a residential area.
Motion by Council Member Travis. seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to approve the site plan submitted bv Llovd Drillinl!: continl!:ent u\>on an
approved Developer's Al!:reement. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Mayor Swedberg stated Mr. Drilling has done everything he can to mitigate resident
concerns and thanked him for doing so. Mayor Swedberg questioned if the grass on the
berms would be maintained. Mr. Drilling concurred.
Mayor Swedberg questioned whether the area in the northwest corner of the property
would be paved or sodded. Mr. Drilling stated that the area would be sodded and
maintained similar to the berms.
Mayor Swedberg indicated he would like Mr. Joe Goetz or another landscaping expert to
comment on the landscaping plan. Mr. Drilling stated that the architects would provide
information and recommendations for landscaping.
3. Police Commission Interviews
Mr. March stated that Council needed to appoint three (3) individuals to participate on
the Police Commission Interview Panel. Mayor Swedberg had previously expressed
interest in participating and felt that the Mr. March should also participate. Mr. March
also stated that Commissioner Wright had also expressed interest in participating.
Motion bv Mavor Swedberl!:. seconded bv Council Member Broussard Vickers to
appoint Mayor Swedberl!:. City Administrator March. and Commissioner Wril!:ht to
the Police Commission Interview Panel. Ayes - 4. Nays - 1 (Travis). Motion
carried.
Council Member Nelson expressed her desire to have been a part of the process.
4. Goals and Objectives
Mr. March explained Mayor Swedberg has suggested a Council work session to discuss
the consolidated list of2001 goals and objectives. Mayor Swedberg explained he wished
to get a sense of order to the list. It is difficult to find time for Council Members to speak
to one another and this is the reason behind scheduling a work session. Mayor Swedberg
suggested a work session be held on January 31, 2001 at 7:30 p.m. Consensus was to
schedule a work session for January 31, 2001 at 7:30 p.m.
Mr. March requested that Council rank their goals in order of importance to them prior to
the meeting.
Mayor Swedberg requested that Mr. Hoeft and Mr. Peterson to provide the top 10 items,
in their opinions, for the City from the list of ideas.
Page 7 of 14
Forwarded to Council Members
Via e-mail on 211101 at 2:46 p.m.
5. Fete des Lacs Bv-Laws and Electrical
Motion by Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Capra to table
discussion on the By-Laws until Council has met with the Fete des Lacs Committee.
All in fayor. Motion carried unanimously.
Council Member Capra stated that Council is investigating the possibility of
standardizing By-Laws for commissions/committees.
Mr. De Vine stated that the next meeting of the Fete des Lacs Committee is scheduled for
February 19, 2001 at 6:30 p.m. Mr. Hoeft indicated February 19, 2001 was a legal
holiday, and Council would not be allowed to participate. Mr. DeVine suggested
rescheduling the Fete des Lacs Committee meeting to Wednesday, February 21, 200lat
6:30 p.m.
Mayor Swedberg explained the City has received a donation of lights and a scoreboard,
however, that is no power at the park to operate same. Other activities, such as the
festival, do not have ample power.
Mr. DeVine explained the difficulties experienced last year providing enough power for
the carnival and R.V. parking.
Council Member Capra questioned how the carnival was powered last year. Mr. DeVine
explained the City was able to rent a large generator inexpensively, however, a sizeable
discount was obtained and several extension cords were purchased. Mr. DeVine felt that
Council's consideration of this proposal was crucial at this time. Mr. DeVine stated that
providing ample power to the park prior to the festival was of the utmost concern. Mr.
De Vine stated that if Council denied approval for electrical installation at the park,
alternative arrangements would need to be made.
Mayor Swedberg questioned whether there was a master site plan for the park. Mr.
March concurred. Mr. March stated that a portion of the electrical issue hinges on the
church property and construction of a concession building.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned whether the electrical installation could
be completed in stages. Mr. Palzer indicated the City would save money if the entire
project was approved and commenced at the same time.
Council Member Broussard questioned the cost for providing electric for the camivallast
year. Mr. Devine explained that if the City would need to rent a generator of similar size
to that used last year, it would cost approximately $5,000 and the purchase of extension
cords totaled $2,000. Mr. DeVine stated that neither the Parks and Recreation or Fete des
Lacs Committee have the funds to acquire the needed electrical installation. Mr. DeVine
stated that the approximate cost to acquire same would be $100,000.
Mayor Swedberg directed Mr. Peterson to work with Mr. Palzer to determine an initial
plan and approximate cost to run electrical in the park and forward same to Council for
review.
Page 8 of 14
Forwarded to Council Members
Via e-mail on 2/1101 at 2:46 p.m.
Mr. March stated that the City has the possibility of acquiring a regional softball
tournament during the festival if the City is able to provide an adequate facility. Mr.
March felt that this would be a great revenue producer. Mr. March stated that
approximately thirty-two (32) teams participate in the tournament.
Council Member Nelson stated that donations may be obtained from downtown
businesses, as activities such as these will generate business for them.
6. Downtown Petition for Water and Street Enhancements
Mr. March discussed the submitted petition. Mr. March explained that the petition
requests local improvements, (i.e. municipal water and street enhancements) on
Centerville Road between the south line of 7046 Centerville Road and the north line of
Westview Street. This matter will be discussed at an upcoming work session.
7. Union Contract
Mayor Swedberg requested and consensus was to remove this item for discussion at an
Executive Session immediately following the Council meeting.
8. Snow Removal Policv
Council Member Nelson complimented staff on drafting the policy.
Council Member Nelson questioned whether Staff would put a notice on downtown
business doors if they do not shovel. Mr. March explained the City will remove snow
pushed out into street and if a business owner does not remove snow from its sidewalk,
there is an ordinance to handle the issue. The City will not go on private property to
remove the snow for them.
Mayor Swedberg stated he is in agreement with the policy but questioned whether the
City needs to clarify the definition of a sidewalk.
Mr. March asked Mr. Hoeft if state statutes contained a definition for sidewalks. There is
a property owner who has questioned whether a seven (7) or eight (8) foot paved area is a
patio or a sidewalk and has decided they should not have to remove the snow from same.
Mr. Hoeft stated he did not believe there was a definition of sidewalks in state statute but
would research the items further. Mr. Hoeft stated that it is a judgment call on the part of
the City.
Mayor Swedberg stated there is confusion concerning right-of-way issues and asked for
clarification of same. Mr. March indicated the only way to resolve the right-of-way
issues are to have the property surveyed. Mayor Swedberg stated he did not feel it was
necessary to have the property surveyed.
Mr. March indicated he had spoken to Mr. Roger Butler, Anoka County, and was told the
City would not be required to obtain a permit to remove snow from the County right-of-
way.
Page 9 of 14
Forwarded to Council Members
Via e-mail on 2/1/01 at 2:46 p.m.
Motion bv Mavor Swedberl!. seconded bv Council Member Nelson to approve the
snow removal policv and direct Staff to provide additional clarity on the sidewalk
issue. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
9. Baron Property
Mr. Palzer stated he met with Mr. Baron last week and discussed a time frame for
completion of the required clean up. Mr. Baron indicated he should be able to comply by
June 1, 2001. Mr. Palzer indicated this time frame was acceptable to him if Council
approved same.
Mr. Hoeft indicated he had spoken with Mr. Palzer concerning the Baron property and
indicated the requested time frame is consistent with weather related contingencies for
housing maintenance codes. It is typical to look toward Mayor June in order to allow
thawing to occur and allow residents to remove debris.
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Capra to l!rant
the Barons. an extension to June 1. 2001 to brinl! the property into compliance with
City codes.
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated she would like to see continued progress
during the 20-week extension. She then asked Mr. Palzer if he felt progress could be
made over the course of the extension time or if it was a situation where the weather
simply would not allow for additional clean-up. Mayor Swedberg suggested Mr. Palzer
schedule a visit in mid-April to check the progression of the clean up. Mr. Palzer
indicated Mr. Baron was working on clean up when he stopped by to discuss this matter
with him and said he felt the Barons would be able to make continued progress during the
extension period.
Council Member Broussard Vickers requested a friendly amendment to the motion to
include a recheck of the property in ten (10) weeks and, provided continued progress is
being made, Council would grant another ten (10) week extension to June 1,2001. The
friendly amendment was accepted by Council Member Nelson as the motioner and
Council Member Capra as the seconder.
Friendly Amendment: To l!rant a ten (10) week extension to brin!! the property into
compliance with Citv codes. and if continued prOl!ress is beinl! made an additional
ten (10) week extension would be l!ranted to allow the Barons to complete the clean-
up bv June 1. 2001. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
10. . Stop Sign (Main Street and Centerville Road)
I Page 10 of14
l
Forwarded to C01.Ulcil Members
Via e-mail on 2/1/01 at 2:46 p.m.
Mayor Swedberg explained he had done a ride along with the police on a snowy morning
and witnessed the issue with the stop sign on Main Street fIrst hand. It is not clearly
visible and people are going through same.
Mr. Palzer explained that the City may not modify or change signs in the County right-of-
way. Mr. Palzer referenced a letter from Police Chief Heckman and concurred with his
recommendations. Mr. Palzer suggested talking with the County to get flashing lights to
alert people of the intersection.
Mayor Swedberg stated that the City could requested that the County improve the stop
sign or install flashing lights or authorize the City to make the improvements and assume
the expenses associated with same.
Council Member Capra requested that Staff obtain costs for installing flashing red lights
at the intersection. Mayor Swedberg concurred.
Mayor Swedberg suggested sharing the costs of installation and the flashing lights with
the County and School District.
Mr. DeVine suggested the City contact the County to request that the pavement markings
be repainted on the street as they were removed when the pavement was scraped this fall.
Mr. DeVine stated that markings are not visible and felt that it would be helpful if they
were.
Council Member Broussard Vickers suggested requesting that the police department to
conduct a sting operation at the intersection and ticket individuals that do not stop for the
stop sign. Mayor Swedberg stated he was uncomfortable with same, due to the fact that
people simply do not see the sign and the problem needs to be resolved.
Council Member Capra questioned the number of violations for this particular area of
concern and Mayor Swedberg indicated that the information was contained in Council
packets.
Mr. March stated he would like to see an overhead stoplight at the intersection to improve
safety at the intersection and to be used for hanging community banners and holiday
decorations.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked Staff to ask the County when they intend to
repaint the crosswalks and to request them to do it as soon as possible.
Mayor Swedberg directed Staff to prepare cost estimates to install rumble strips,
rearrange signs, install an overhead stoplight, and to install overhead flashing lights for
Council review and discussion.
VIII. CONSENT AGENDA
1. January 10,2001 Meeting Minutes
2. The City of CentervilIe January II, through January 24, 2001 Expenditures
Page II of 14
Forwarded to Council Members
Via e-mail on 2/1101 at 2:46 p.m.
3. Centennial Fire District Expenditures
4. Resignation of Account Clerk II, Laura Thompson
5. EDC's recommendation for appointment of Mr. Rick Terway
6. Hiring of Mr. Joel McPherson (public Works)
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Capra to
approve the Consent Al!enda for Items #1-#6 as presented. All in favor. Motion
carried unanimously.
Council Member Travis requested that the minutes be contained in Council packets
allowing review prior to the Council meeting. Mr. March indicated the minutes are
usually in packets but due to staff absences, the deadline for packets was not met so the
minutes were e-mailed to Council Members.
Mr. March noted the minutes would not be on the consent agenda at future meetings as it
is an item that warrants review and discussion.
IX. COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council Member Capra reported that the Economic Development Committee (EDe)
intends to hand out a flier at Snow Days at Wargo Nature Center and asked for Council
Approval of the flier. She also noted that EDC has donated $100 for prize money at the
event.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned the need for Council approval. Council
Member Capra stated the flier is coming from the City and she believed it should be
approved by Council.
Motion bv Mayor Swedberg. seconded bv Council Member Capra to approve the
EDC flier as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Council Member Travis reported that the Fire Steering Committee met last Thursday, but
due to a lack of quorum, there was no voting. Due to the lack of a quorum, another
meeting would be scheduled prior to the April meeting. Mr. March noted the meeting
had been scheduled for February 19,2001, which is President's Day and will have to be
rescheduled.
X. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
Staff was directed to check with Rice Creek Watershed District to see if they were
interested in purchasing the property at 7007 20th A venue for green space. Rice Creek
Watershed informed Mr. March they do not have funds available to acquire the property
at this time. If the City would be purchasing the property to turn it into a park that would
be of benefit to the water quality of the creek, there may be something that could be
worked out.
Page 12 of 14
.
Forwarded to Council Members
Via e-mail on 2/1/01 at 2:46 p.m.
Mr. March reported County Bank is making progress on their building and the monument
sign and installation has begun. Staff feels this building will be a nice entrance to the
community.
Motion by Mayor Swedberl!. seconded by Council Member Nelson to recess to the
Executive Session at 8:24 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to close the Executive Session and continue the Council Meetinl! at 9:02
p.m. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Sweenev to
adjourn the JanuarY 24. 2001 City Council Meetinl! at 9:03 p.m. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimouslv.
Transcribed by:
Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
Proofed by:
Teresa Bender, Clerk/Treasurer (Staff)
Page 13 ofl4
.
,
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY 10, 2001
6:00 p.m.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly
meeting on January 10,2001, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street.
PRESENT: Acting Mayor Dick Travis
Council Member Linda Broussard Vickers
Council Member Mari Nelson
o
ABSENT:
None.
STAFF:
City Administrator, Jim March
City Engineer, Tom P son
City Attorney, Jim H e
Public Works Direct r,
OTHERS:
I.
J 1 200, Ity Council meeting to order at 6:00
II.
oath 0 office to Mayor elect Tim Swedberg and
III.
emb r a ra requested a etter regarding a Cub Scout request be added as item
Ne Business.
ch equested Pay Estimate #3 for Lift Station #2 be added under Payment of
. March requested letters from Mrs. Camp-Baron and Mr. Schoenberger be added
under Petitions and Complaints.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded bv Council Member
Nelson to approve the al!enda with the requested additions. All in favor. Motion
carried unanimouslv.
Page 1 of 18
~
IV. PUBLIC HEARING (8)
1. Lloyd Drilling - Site Plan
Mayor Swedberg opened the public hearing at 6:08 p.m.
Mr. Drilling gave a brief overview of the submitted site plan for the proposed strip mall
located at 1873 Main Street.
Council Member Nelson questioned whether the pile of dirt currently located on the site
would be used for the berm. Mr. Drilling stated that a portion of the dirt may be used for
the berm. Council Member Nelson questioned whether the fence would be located on top
of the berm. Mr. Drilling concurred.
Council Member Nelson questioned whether the trail location met with the approval of
the Rice Creek Watershed District. Mr. Drilling stated that the proposed project does not
require Rice Creek Watershed District approval.
Council Member Nelson questioned whether Mr. Drilling had spoken with the Parks and
Recreation Committee concerning the trail. Mr. Drilling stated that the trail way would
comply with City requirements.
Council Member Capra questioned the size of the buffer to be located on the north
portion of the property or proposed development. Mr. Drilling stated that there was a six
(6) foot area between the building and the neighboring property.
Council Member Nelson questioned whether anything would be done with the trail on the
west side of the property. Mr. Drilling stated that modifications to the trail in that area
would need to be done with the permission of Anoka County and Rice Creek Watershed
District.
Mr. Bruce Luikart, 7130 Peterson Trail, questioned whether the ditch would be filled in
along the west side of the property. Mr. Drilling concurred subject to Anoka County and
Rice Creek Watershed District's permission.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned whether Mr. Drilling had determined the
types of materials and colors for the exterior of the building. Mr. Drilling provided a
drawing showing the front of the building being brick with lighter colored siding on the
top. Mr. Drilling stated that for maintenance purposes, an entire brick front would be
desired.
Mr. March stated that Mr. Drilling had yet to provide a grading plan to Mr. Hoeft. Mr.
March explained that Mr. Drilling's submission for site plan approval lacked several
required submissions prior to receiving Council's approval or denial. Mr. March stated
subsequent to the lack of the required submissions, Council is unable to approve or deny
same.
Page 2 of18
,
Mayor Swedberg stated there was a meeting to discuss various administrative issues and
the consensus was to empower commissions to handle all the specifics concerning these
types of requests prior to being forwarded to Council.
Council Member Broussard Vickers explained the Planning and Zoning Commission had
passed on and approved this basic plan with the stipulation that Council would decide on
the more definitive parts of the site plan as has been the procedure in the past. Planning
and Zoning was comfortable that Council would provide Mr. Drilling with its final
wishes for the proposed mall prior to approval. Mr. Drilling is in attendance to obtain
Council's requirements for exterior building components and additional requirements
recommended by Council.
Mayor Swedberg noted he had thought there was consensus at the meeting earlier in the
week to empower the commissions to do that sort of detail work.
Council Member Nelson stated she would like to see the site plan go before the Parks and
Recreation Committee for trail approval.
Mayor Swedberg indicated a desire to try to develop a process that allows for total review
by all commissions/committees prior to submission to Council.
Mr. Jeff Turner, 7151 Peterson Trail, stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended that Mr. Drilling bring a more detailed plan to this meeting. At the
previous hearings for the west building where the front was redesigned, it was stated by
residents that they would like greenery added to screen the proposed mall from Peterson
Trail and that did not occur. Mr. Turner would like to see that the same mistake is not
made twice. Mr. Turner stated it would be nice to have greenery added to the west
building as a part of this site plan approval. Mr. Turner suggested trees or some type of
shrubbery be also added in the northwest comer of the property.
Mr. Turner submitted a letter concerning the increased traffic on Peterson Trail due to the
proposed strip mall and requested dead-ending same. Mr. Turner stated that he has
requested several times that a traffic study be completed on Peterson Trail.
Mr. Luikart questioned the landscaping of the northwest comer of the property. Mr.
Drilling stated that it would be sodded and maintained accordingly.
Mayor Swedberg indicated he did not want to take up Council time on endless details.
Mr. Turner questioned the process for obtaining resident input at the commission/
committee level.
Mayor Swedberg noted that all commission/committee meetings are public and residents
are free to attend.
Mr. Turner asked Mr. Drilling what would be located in the northwest comer of the
property. Mr. Drilling stated that a sloping, grassy area to route drainage to the swale
that collects drainage and there is a six (6) foot fence at the back of the property. Mr.
Page 3 of18
,
Turner questioned whether there would be a possibility of an employee parking lot
located in the northwest comer. Mr. Drilling concurred.
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated that the City was in transition and Mayor
Swedberg would like to see more of the details ironed out at the commission/committee
levels.
Mr. Eric Bowman, 7130 Shad Avenue, stated that he was representing his neighbor, Mr.
Jerry Engler who was unable to attend and questioned if the berm would go north along
the short job on the property. Mr. Drilling stated that he did not anticipate continuing the
berm north.
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated that the Bowmans were present at the previous
Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing regarding the proposed strip mall
where it was requested that the screen be at a ten (l0) foot level to block the view of the
residents on Shad Avenue.
Mr. Bowman stated that Mr. Engler desired to have the berm run north to the edge of the
property line. Mr. Drilling said he would consider Mr. Engler's request; however, he
must comply with the City's drainage requirements. Mr. Drilling explained that drainage
plans require the City Engineer's recommendations.
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated that drainage considerations and
recommendations would be made by the City Engineer, not the developer or residents.
Mr. Bowman clarified that there would not be a driveway on Shad Avenue and thanked
Mr. Drilling.
Mayor Swedberg asked if Shad Avenue were closed off how would the affected property
owners react. Mr. Bowman stated that it would depend on where it was closed off.
Mayor Swedberg suggested closing it off at County Road 14. Mr. Bowman stated that he
felt it was a good idea but said the City would need to discuss same with the affected
property owner on the Comer of Shad Avenue.
Council Member Capra questioned how residents would feel if the City dead-ended
Peterson Trail. Mrs. Bowman stated the residents on Shad Avenue were concerned about
an entrance onto Shad Avenue due to increased traffic. Council Member Capra also
expressed concern for the anticipated increase in traffic levels due to the addition of
another shopping mall and its location to the existing shopping mall.
Mr. James Bigelow, 7143 Shad Avenue, stated he wanted to make sure Council knew
that not all residents in Centerville are in favor of more commercial areas in the City.
There are a lot of individuals who moved here knowing it was a bedroom community and
expected that taxes would be higher. Mr. Bigelow expressed concern for closing
Peterson Trail because that would increase the traffic on Shad A venue. Peterson Trail is
a main north/south traffic artery and closing it would put a lot more traffic on other
streets. He personally would rather not see a retail or commercial center there.
Page 4 of 18
Mr. Jeff Turner of 7151 Peterson Trail stated he understands the concern for increased
traffic on Shad Avenue. However, he believes if Peterson Trail was a dead end that
would divide traffic between Old Mill Road and Shad A venue. The least amount of
damage is done and both streets share in increased traffic.
Mr. Bowman stated Mr. Turner's proposal would direct traffic onto Shad Avenue that
wasn't there before. Peterson Trail is a major north/south traffic path for many people
and if it were closed off there would be increased traffic on other streets.
Mayor Swedberg indicated there are concerns for traffic management, which can be
mitigated, but the question is how to proceed.
Council Member Nelson inquired as to whether dead-ending Peterson Trail would have
an impact on Mr. Drilling's project. Mr. Drilling indicated it would not hurt the project to
dead end Peterson Trail. Mr. Drilling stated he would not want to see the project hinging
on dead-ending Peterson Trail, as traffic flow on Peterson Trail has been a concern for
many years.
Council Member Nelson agreed with Council Member Capra in her concern for
automobile and pedestrian traffic crossing Peterson Trail. She is not necessarily in favor
of dead ending Peterson Trail but it would be good to have Planning and Zoning review
it.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the Peterson Trail and other traffic issues
are separate from this issue she does not see where the City would have the ability or the
desire to stop this project until the bigger issues concerning traffic are resolved. The
residents of Shad A venue and the residents of Peterson Trail will never agree on how to
solve the traffic issue.
Council Member Broussard Vickers expressed concern for sending this back to Planning
and Zoning as this process was started under the former Council and it seems somewhat
unfair to send it back because Council intends to change the process. Mr. Drilling is
aware of what he needs to provide to Council in order to receive final approval. Mr.
Drilling can work with Staff to provide enough information to prepare his final site plan
for the next Council meeting.
Council Member Nelson stated she was okay with not sending it back to the Planning and
Zoning Commission as long as the Park and Recreation Committee has seen and
approved the plan for the trail.
Council Member Capra inquired as to whether there was a Park and Recreation
Committee meeting before the next Council meeting.
Mr. March indicated there was not a Park and Recreation Committee meeting before the
next Council meeting. He then indicated the Park and Recreation Committee has
approved the location of the trail.
Mayor Swedberg inquired as to why there aren't two entrances onto Main Street.
Page 5 ofl8
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the County would not allow it.
Mr. Lukehart inquired as to where and when residents would be asked for input on
landscaping. Council Member Broussard Vickers explained that typically would have
been heard at the first two public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Committee.
Mr. Lukehart would like to see an evergreen barrier along his property line and possibly a
fence. Mr. Drilling asked how long Mr. Lukehart's fence is. Mr. Lukehart indicated it
was 80 feet and did not quite go all the way to the comer due to the tree line. Mr.
Drilling stated if trees were added maybe there wouldn't be a need for a fence. Mr.
Drilling stated he could add trees and a fence if need be.
Mr. March suggested tabling this matter to the next Council meeting for further input on
the landscaping plan rather than having to re-notice for another meeting.
Mayor Swedberg inquired as to whether it was appropriate to have residents submit
written comments concerning the site plan. City Attorney Hoeft said it was appropriate
to have written resident input and procedurally it would be best to table this matter rather
than re-notice for another meeting.
Mayor Swedberg noted Mr. Drilling has been very accommodating to resident concerns.
Mr. Drilling asked if Council tables the public hearing would it be revisited later at this
meeting.
Mayor Swedberg indicated it would be revisited later at this meeting.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded bv Council Member
Capra to continue the public hearine: to January 24, 2001, at 6:00 p.m. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimously.
V. APPEARANCES/AWARDS
None.
VI. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
1. December 27, 2000 Meeting Minutes
Motion bv Council Member Nelson, seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to approve the December 27, 2000, City Council Meetine: Minutes as
presented. Aves - 3 Abstain - 2 (Swedber!!:lCapra). Motion carried.
VII. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
The City ofCenterville December 28. through Januarv 10.2001
Page 6 of 18
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to approve the expenditures for the City from December 28. 2000 throue-h
January 10. 2001. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Centennial Fire District Expenses
Council Member Broussard Vickers inquired as to what piece of equipment was
purchased for $18,000. Mr. March noted it was the thermal imaging camera.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded bv Council Member
Capra to approve the Centennial Fire District Expenditures checks #12473-12484
in the amount of $30.683.43. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Pay Request #3 for Lift Station #2
City Engineer Peterson explained this is Pay Request #3 for Lift Station #2 for
installation and construction of the control panel.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded bv Council Member
Capra to approve Pay Reauest #3 for Lift Station #2 in the amount of $18.793.00.
All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
VIII. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS
1. Letter from Don Schoenberger
Mayor Swedberg explained Mr. Schoenberger who lives at 7018 Dupre Road has had a
problem with Waste Management, as his garbage was not picked up.
Council Member Capra asked Mr. March if this mistake could be attributed to garbage
pick up being on a holiday schedule for the week in question.
Mr. March indicated twice Waste Management told Mr. Schoenherger that his garbage
would be picked up later that day but it was not. Waste Management hasn't responded to
the complaint yet, however, the customer service person lives in Centerville and has been
very responsive on other occasions. Mr. March believes she is out on vacation. Mr.
March stated sometimes there is problems with pick up when the regular driver is off and
there is a substitute driver. This appears to be an isolated incident and Mr. March will
talk to the General Manager of Waste Management and ask that this issue be addressed.
Council Member Nelson stated she would like to have Waste Management deal with the
issue in writing and copy Council.
Council Member Travis indicated this appears to be an isolated incident and the
suggestion to have more than one garbage hauler in the City is not the answer. Waste
Management appears to have a good system in place for dealing with customer service
issues and he is satisfied the issue will be handled properly.
Page 7 of 18
Council Member Broussard Vickers noted Council has discussed the issue of allowing
more than one (I) garbage hauler in the past and it was decided to allow one (I) hauler.
This is a very good incentive for Waste Management to provide excellent customer
service in order to ensure their contract will be renewed.
2. Letter from Mrs. Camp-Baron
Mayor Swedberg explained the Barons have asked to receive an extension on the 60-day
time frame to clean up their lot and bring it into compliance with Ordinance #4 due to
snow and ice.
Council Member Capra questioned whether anyone has checked the condition of the
property since the Barons were notified to clean it up. Mr. Palzer indicated the 60-day
period expires on January 12,2001 and he had intended to call the Barons to set up an
appointment to inspect the property the following week.
Council Member Capra questioned whether there was someone who knew what it looked
like initially so they would be able to tell if progress had been made.
Council Member Travis indicated the City has pictures of the condition of the property.
Mr. Ray DeVine, 1695 Main Street, stated the Barons have cleaned up several items and
appear to be making progress.
Council Member Broussard Vickers inquired as to whether Council has the authority to
grant the extension and if it does, what sort of precedence would it set.
Mr. Hoeft stated that Council does have the authority to grant the extension. He then
recommended letting the 60-day time period expire, Mr. Palzer inspect the property to
determine whether the issues are weather related, and Council consider the extension.
Motion by Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Broussard
Vickers to direct Staff to inspect the Baron property after the expiration of the 60-
day time period to determine whether there is valid reason to believe further clean
up is bein!! impeded by weather. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
IX. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
L Downtown Snow Removal
Mayor Swedberg explained there is a safety issue for children getting to school due to the
build up of snow on sidewalks in the downtown area. There are also issues of downtown
parking if there are windrows of snow, the cars park farther and farther away from the
curb into the street, which creates a hazard.
Mr. March stated that the Mayor and several business owners had met on Monday to
discuss snow removal issues at the comer of Centerville Road and Main Street. In the
last couple of days there have been several instances in the news of cities having issues
with downtown snow removal so this is not a problem specific to Centerville. The City
Page 8 of 18
L
is attempting to establish a policy for snow removal and this may become a city
responsibility in the downtown area. The City is not talking about removing snow from
private sidewalks but along Centerville Road and Main Street the plows are pushing
snow onto the sidewalks. Mr. March will present a draft snow removal policy for
Council consideration at their next meeting.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned whether the City had removed any snow
from the area. Mr. March stated that he directed Public Works to push the snow back
from the area where the children wait for the bus; however, no snow has been removed.
Mayor Swedberg questioned whether there would be a memorandum of understanding
between the City and property owners concerning the snow removal policy. Mr. March
explained when the policy is determined; Staff will notifY residents and business owners
in the downtown area. The City intends to clarifY what conditions need to exist prior
declaring a snow emergency, which will give property owners permission to push snow
into the County right-of-way, and the City will remove same.
Council Member Travis stated he drove by after he got the e-mail and it appeared to him
there was little or no effort to clear a path on the east side of Centerville Road and the
south side of Main Street. The children had stomped a path through the snow but the
property owner had not cleared even a walkway. Council Member Travis questioned
what the responsibility of the business owner is for snow removal. Mr. March indicated
he has spoken to the business owner and he and the business owner came to an
understanding that the sidewalk is a public sidewalk and the business owner is
responsible for removing the snow.
Mayor Swedberg noted the City should make the schools aware of the designated
walking routes within the City.
Mayor Swedberg noted he had received an e-mail from a resident concerning citywide
removal of snow from sidewalks and wanted to make Council aware it may need to be
addressed at a later time.
X. NEW BUSINESS
1. Jovce A. Stevens - Rezone from R2 to II Request - n007-20th Avenue)
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated residents present at the Planning and
Zoning meeting were opposed to the rezone. This parcel is unique in size and shape and
the owner would like to sell the property and a zoning change would make it easier to do
so. There are larger concerns for the parcel due to the size and shape and the fact there is
a floodway located on the property. The property owner is paying commercial! industrial
taxes based on use not zoning. Most residents did not object to the current operation but
were opposed to expansion of the business or the rezoning the property.
The rezone was denied because the property owner asked for industrial zoning which the
Planning and Zoning Commission did not believe was an appropriate use for the
property. There is commercial property along the side of the street the property is
located on and the other side is zoned industrial. The business located on the property is
Page 9 ofl8
nonconforming and, therefore, the use cannot be intensified. The business can maintain
the building but not improve or enhance it.
Mr. Don Moe, 7040 Brian Court, stated he had addressed the Planning and Zoning
Commission stating he felt the City is obligated to follow the Comprehensive Plan for
this piece of property. Mr. Moe strongly objects to industrial rezoning because of the
ecological issues the floodway presents and, in the event of a rezone, the loss of control if
in the future the current business decides to sell and a more disruptive business comes in.
He understands Mrs. Stevens wishes to make money by selling the property but as a
neighboring resident he does not want industrial property in his neighborhood.
Ms. Susan Luke, 7026 Brian Court, questioned if the buildings currently located on the
property comply with industrial zoning regulations. Council Member Broussard Vickers
stated they did not conform to any type of zoning and are classified as nonconforming. If
the zoning were to be modified, there are major issues concerning the floodway that
would govern what could be built on the property.
Mr. Hoeft clarified the buildings are classified as a pre-existing, non-conforming, use
meaning the business cannot expand or intensify its use.
Council Member Capra questioned whether residents have any issues with the building
currently located on the property. Ms. Luke indicated her lot abuts the property but she
looks out and sees the house on the property as a nice buffer between her lot and the pole
building. Ms. Luke indicated her main concern with rezoning the property is all
likelihood the house would be tom down.
Mayor Swedberg asked the other residents in attendance if they had any issues with the
business as is. Mr. Moe indicated he had no problem with the current use of the property.
There may be an issue with the new development to the south with it overlooking the lot
with no natural buffer.
Council Member Nelson stated that she was in favor of a rezone if it was not in the
floodway.
Mayor Swedberg expressed concern for allowing an industrial use of the property that
may jeopardize the wells located downstream from the property. In his opinion, a rezone
was inappropriate.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded bv Council Member
Nelson to denv the rezone reauest for 7007 - 20th Avenue from R21 to 11. All in
favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the primary objection is to Industrial
zoning not Commercial and it is possible Mrs. Stevens would request a rezone to
commercial.
A member of the audience questioned if Mrs. Stevens requested a rezone to Commercial
would residents get notice of the meeting. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated
residents would be notified.
Page 10 of 18
Council Member Capra questioned whether the business needed a Special Use Permit to
continue its operation. City Attorney Hoeft explained the Special Use Permit was
brought up as a way to allow the current owner to somehow expand or intensify the
business. The City would be able to better control the operation through the special use
permit process. If the business continues to operate as it currently does, there is no need
for a Special Use Permit.
Mayor Swedberg questioned whether intensification of the business could happen
without involving the building. City Attorney Hoeft indicated there may be a possibility
of this happening; however it would require investigation to determine whether it was an
expansion or intensification.
Mayor Swedberg questioned whether the Rice Creek Watershed District would be
interested in purchasing the floodway property. Mr. March indicated he did not believe
they would. Mayor Swedberg directed Staff to contact Rice Creek Watershed District to
ascertain if they would be interested in purchasing same.
Mr. Hoeft explained the City's Comprehensive Plan does take precedence over the City's
zoning plan. This is a change as it used to be the zoning plan took precedence over the
Comprehensive Plan and the plan went along for the ride. If the Comprehensive Plan
denotes the property as Commercial, it does so because a commercial use for that
property is a better buffer between the Residential area and the intensified roadway.
Council does need to follow the Comprehensive Plan in this instance. The
Comprehensive Plan may be amended at any time if Council deems it appropriate;
however, it will need to be followed. Mr. Hoeft cautioned Council against spot zoning
this piece of property.
Council Member Travis stated the current business owner does not do a considerable
amount of business out of the building, but previously there had been more activity at the
location. He questioned how the City would determine an intensification and what that is
based on.
Mr. Hoeft stated that the City would need to look back historically to the point where
controls making the use non-conforming were put in place and the level of the activity at
that point would be the maximum use for the property.
2. Llovd Drilling - Site Plan
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated Mr. Drilling would like direction from
Council as to what Council would like to see on the final site plan. Council Member
Broussard Vickers stated she would like the berm to come out as far as the Anoka County
will allow, she would like the berm to be four (4) feet high with at least a six (6) foot high
fence on top, she would like to see a specific plan for how the northwest comer of the
property will be landscaped. The developer's agreement will need to specify standards
for the trailway. Mr. Drilling questioned whether the standards for the trailway complied
with City code. Mr. March indicated he would provide Mr. Drilling with the Anoka
County trailway specifications.
Page II of 18
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated color and design of the building were not
that important to her provided it was aesthetically pleasing to look at.
Council Member Capra questioned the location of the proposed trail way in relation to
the trees on the Shad A venue corner of the property. Mr. Drilling pointed out the
trailway on the site plan map and indicated if the County will not allow the trees to stay
where they are, they will be relocated somewhere else on the property.
Mayor Swedberg questioned the amount of commercial development in an area before
the City needs to talk to the County about adding turn lanes on Main Street. Mr. Peterson
indicated the request is usually as a result of a number of accidents in the area. Just
adding the driveway onto Main Street would not warrant turn lanes.
Mayor Swedberg questioned whether it was a good idea for the driveways from the two
(2) commercial areas to match up. Mr. Peterson concurred.
Mayor Swedberg questioned whether the City needed to restrict the hours of operation to
mitigate noise for neighboring residents. Council Member Broussard Vickers stated that
City Ordinance would cover this issue.
Mayor Swedberg questioned whether Centerville restricts 24-hour businesses. Council
Member Broussard Vickers indicated 24-hour businesses have not been an issue.
Mayor Swedberg questioned whether the Fire Chief would have a problem with the berm
and fence. Mr. Drilling indicated there should be plenty of access for fire vehicles.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated final site plan approval would be
contingent upon the approval ofthe police and fire departments.
Council Member Nelson questioned if permission was granted from Anoka County and
Rice Creek Watershed to fill in the ditch and connect the trail, whether or not Mr.
Drilling was willing to pay for same. Mr. Drilling said he would be willing to share in
the expense with the City to connect the trail as it would be less maintenance for him.
Council Member Travis indicated he did not have a problem with the proposed site plan
and felt no need for the City to get involved with the architectural features and colors of
the building. The concerns of residents have been met and he can think of no other
additions to the site plan.
Council Member Capra asked if Mr. Drilling could hang up the colored map of the
building. Council Member Capra questioned whether the colors on the map were the
colors Mr. Drilling intended to use for the building. Mr. Drilling indicated the colors
were not the colors he intended to use for the building and requested input from Council.
Mr. Drilling expressed a desire to have this proposed building look similar to, but not
exactly like, the existing building.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked Mr. Drilling to incorporate the same green
color used for the shingles on the other building into some aspect of the proposed
building. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated Mr. Drilling needed to provide
Page 12 of 18
Council with landscape and grading plans and specify exterior building color at the next
meeting.
Mayor Swedberg questioned whether there would be exterior lighting at the building.
Mr. Drilling indicated the lighting would be the same as the other building.
Council Member Nelson commented the lighting at the other building has worked well.
Mayor Swedberg questioned whether the doorways would be wide enough for a wheel
chair to pass through. Mr. Drilling explained state law required all buildings to be
handicapped accessible.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned whether Mr. Hoeft would be drafting the
developer's agreement. Mr. Hoeft indicated Council would approve the site plan subject
to an approved developer's agreement at the next Council meeting.
Council explained Mr. Drilling would need to provide a plan for landscaping, including
the style and height of fence, a grading plan, elevation of all sides of the building,
specifics for the service area on the property, and a plan showing the colors and types of
materials to be used for the building. Mr. March suggested Mr. Drilling apply for his
Anoka County access permit.
3. Anoka County BRA Budget for Chauncev Barett Gardens
Mr. March noted the copy of the operating budget for Chauncey Barett Gardens found in
Council packets was for informational purposes only to make Council aware ofthe City's
name being on the essential function bond that financed the project.
4. Cost of Living Increase
Mayor Swedberg explained at the beginning of each year Council adjusts the payroll
chart to reflect a cost of living adjustment to the wage schedule. Based on information
gathered from numerous cities and it appears that three percent (3%) is the average.
Colincil Member Capra questioned whether the surveyed communities used three percent
(3%) for just cost of living or did that percentage include normal step increases. Mr.
March indicated the three percent (3%) was only a cost of living increase. Mayor
Swedberg noted the three percent (3%) increase was in line with federal agencies.
Motion bv Council Member Travis, seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to approve a three percent (3 %) cost of Iivin!! increase as presented to
Council. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
5. 2001 Fee Schedule (Resolution #01-001)
Mr. March noted the items highlighted on Council Member's copies of the fee schedule
had been adjusted already. Fees can be increased at any time during the year but the City
has always made a point to review fees at the beginning of the year.
Page 13 of 18
Council Member Nelson questioned whether fees and permits were determined based on
actual administrative costs. Mr. March stated that administrative costs have increased
and that is the basis for increasing fees. The City could be challenged if fees and permits
do not follow actual expenses.
Mayor Swedberg indicated he does not understand the fee schedule and suggested
Council hold a deeper discussion on this matter at a future date. Mr. March suggested a
workshop session and asked that Staff be made aware of any issues the Mayor would like
researched.
Mayor Swedberg questioned whether the current fee schedule would remain in place if
this Resolution were tabled for further discussion. Mr. Hoeft indicated the City has a fee
schedule that would apply if this new Resolution is not approved. Fees have to have a
rational relationship to the costs involved but it is a bit arbitrary as it is very difficult to
determine the exact costs for services.
Council Member Broussard Vickers suggested Mayor Swedberg speak to Staff
concerning questions on the fee schedule indicating she did not see the need for an entire
workshop on the issue.
Council Member Nelson stated she would like to have the Resolution passed to make the
increase in park dedication fees effective. She concurred with Mayor Swedberg on
having a workshop.
Council Member Capra noted in looking over the fee schedule she noticed there is a
dance fee she was unaware of which will apply to the Cub Scout Dance this weekend.
Council Member Capra suggested Council adopt the Resolution and revise it at a later
time if deemed it appropriate.
Mr. March noted the next quarterly utility billing would be affected if Council waited for
approval.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded bv Council Member
Capra to approve Resolution 01-001 as presented. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimous Iv.
6. 2001 Apoointrnents (Resolution #01-002)
Mayor Swedberg asked Mr. Hoeft if it were possible to designate a rotating Acting
Mayor. Mr. Hoeft indicated it would be permissible to do so, but administratively it may
be hard to track.
Consensus was to appoint Council Member Travis as Acting Mayor.
Council Member Broussard Vickers expressed her desire to continue as Council Liaison
to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
L_
Council Member Capra stated she was willing to serve as the Council Liaison to the
Cable Commission but has a conflict through the month of April and would not be
Page 14 of 18
available until the first of May. Mayor Swedberg volunteered to be the Alternate for the
Cable Commission indicating he would attend the meetings until Council Member Capra
was available.
Council Member Travis volunteered to continue to serve on the Fire Steering Committee.
Mr. March noted typically the Mayor and a Council Member from each city, the Fire
Chief, and City Administrators meet on a quarterly basis to discuss Fire District issues.
The City Engineer is Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates.
The City Forester is Joe Goetz of Goetz Landscape.
Mayor Swedberg noted there is a vacancy on the Economic Development Commission
and invited residents to apply. Mr. March noted he had recently received a letter of
interest from Mr. Rick Terway.
Mayor Swedberg stated he would like to hold off on appointing liaisons until next month
to allow time to talk to the various committees.
The City's official depository is First State Bank III Hugo and County Bank III
Centerville.
The City's official newspaper is Quad Community Press.
The City's responsible authority is Mr. March.
Mayor Swedberg noted he was honored to be the Weed Inspector per state law and asked
that in his absence Mr. Paul Palzer serve as the Deputy Weed Inspector.
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Travis to
approve Resolution 01-002 as presented with the reQuested challl!es. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimously.
7. Ordinance #4 - Amendments
Council Member Broussard Vickers gave a brief overview of the purposes behind the
proposed amendments.
Motion by Council Member Nelson. seconded by Mayor Swedbere to approve the
Ordinance #4 amendments as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
8. Ordinance #39 - Sign
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated this was a new ordinance that would
supersede any information on signage currently listed in Ordinance #4. The Planning and
Zoning Commission looked at sign ordinances from numerous cities in formulating this
new ordinance.
Page 15 of 18
Council Member Capra noted the Economic Development Committee has requested that
Council not approve this until it receives clarification on commercial signage concerning
wall signs.
Council Member Nelson stated she objects to home-based businesses with county road
frontage being allowed 24 square feet of signage. Her main concern is for allowing a
commercial type sign in a residential yard.
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated she did not believe there were very many
locations where this new signage would apply.
Council Member Nelson expressed a concern for the size of the sign and stated she
believed the issue was worth the expense and time of re-noticing for a public hearing.
She stated she would be more comfortable if a larger sign were allowed just along Main
Street but not all county roads.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she believed the size of the sign would be
more of a problem along Main Street than along county roads where vehicles travel at a
higher rate of speed.
Mr. March stated he believed based on the speed of traffic, the sign would not appear that
large.
Council Member Broussard Vickers inquired as to the cost of publishing for a public
hearing. Mr. March indicated the cost was approximately $75.
Council Member Nelson would like to remove the last two (2) sentences and allow home-
based businesses a sign of only four (4) square feet.
Motion by Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Capra to send
Ordinance #39 back to the Planninl! and Zoninl! Commission to review the section
of the ordinance concerninl! home-based business sil!ns. Specifically reQuestinl! the
sentence concerninl! size of sil!n allowed for businesses with county road frontal!e be
deleted. the size of the sign remain no larl!er than four (4) square feet. and the sign
not be an interior-illuminated sil!n. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Council Member Capra noted she would let the Economic Development Committee
know that if there are further questions, a representative should be at the Planning and
Zoning Commission meeting to discuss it.
9. Purchase of a 2001 Ford Sterling Plow Truck
Mayor Swedberg noted Mr. Palzer has put together criteria for the purchase of a new
plow. The current plow is used and the City has budgeted over a three (3) year period for
this purchase.
Mr. Palzer presented brochures regarding the proposed plow for review. The quotes were
put together through the State Bid Package process. There are two (2) separate quotes,
one for the plow truck and one for the body, plow and sander. Mr. Palzer anticipates that
Page 16 of 18
the vehicle will last 20 or 25 years. Mr. Palzer asked for an additional $321 for a hitch
system.
Mr. Palzer stated that the quote from J-Craft is good through the end of March. Mr.
Palzer stated that Ford Motor Company allocates a certain number of vehicles for this
type of use and they were out of vehicles by February last year.
Council Member Capra questioned when the City would receive the truck. Mr. Palzer
stated it takes between four (4) and five (5) months.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned where the truck would be purchased. Mr.
Palzer explained the truck would be purchased from Boyer Trucks and the body and plow
package would be purchased from J-Craft.
Mr. Peterson left the meeting at 9:08 p.m.
Motion bv Mavor Swedben!, seconded bv Council Member Nelson to purchase the
2001 Ford Sterlinl! Plow/Sand Truck as presented not to exceed $90,000 plus tax,
freil!ht and license. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned the color of the truck. Mr. Palzer
indicated it would be blue.
10. Resignation of Ear! Fleischman - Public Works Vacancv
Mr. March asked Council to acknowledge and accept the resignation of Mr. Earl
Fleischman. Mr. March and Mr. Palzer have discussed filling the vacancy and propose
looking at the list of candidates from the last round of interviews. Mr. March noted he
would like to contact the second place candidate to see it the individual would still be
interested.
Motion bv Council Member Nelson, seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to accept the resil!nation of Mr. Earl Fleischman, All in favor. Motion
carried unanimouslv.
11. Special Use Permit Renewals
Mr. March explained Council renews the Special Use Permits on an annual basis. There
have been no complaints concerning any of the businesses operating under Special Use
Permits.
Motion bv Conncil Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council Member
Travis to approve the Special Use Permit renewals as presented. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimouslv.
12. Cub Scout Request
Council Member Capra requested the dance fee be waived for the Cub Scouts Dance.
Page 17 of 18
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to waive the dance permit fee based on the Cub Scouts nonprofit
orl!anization status. Aves - 4 Navs - O. Council Member Capra abstained.
Motion carried.
XI. CONSENT AGENDA
None.
XII. COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council Member Broussard Vickers reported the Planning and Zoning Commission will
have a public hearing to discuss the sign ordinance.
Mr. March reported the Fire Steering Committee meets on January 18,2001.
XIII. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
Mr. March reported the one (I) union member has voted on the contract extension and
voted to accept the City's request for a three-year duration. This matter will be before
Council at the next meeting.
Council Member Nelson requested Staff contact Anoka County and Rice Creek
Watershed District regarding the west mall trail to see ifthe ditch could be filled in and
the trail connected to the trail at the east mall.
Mayor Swedberg reported the League of Minoesota Cities has a new piece of software
for city websites and the City could be a test site for them. It would cost the City $500 to
procure this service and there would be a charge of $20 per month. This may be a real
advantage to the City as the City would not have to maintain the site.
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to adjourn the Januarv 10. 2001 Citv Council Meetinl! at 9:20 p.m. Ail in
favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Transcribed by:
Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
Proofed by:
Teresa Bender, Clerk/Treasurer
Staff
Page 18 ofl8
..
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
DECEMBER 27,2000
6:00 p.m.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regular
meeting on December 27,2000, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street.
PRESENT: Mayor Tom Wilharber
Council Member Dick Travis
Council Member Terry Sweeney
Council Member Linda Broussard Vickers
Council Member Mari Nelson
o
ABSENT:
None.
STAFF:
City Administrat
City Engineer, T
City Attorney, Ji H eft
Public orks Di ecto , PuPal e
I. CALL TO
Council meeting to order at 6:00
ase request be added as Item #6 under New
APPEARANCES/AWARDS
None.
Mayor Wilharber informed Council he would need to leave for a police function and would not
be able to stay for the entire meeting. Mayor Wilharber recapped the year's accomplishments for
Council and Staff.
Page 1 of9
. Y2K
. County Bank
. Hunter's Crossing
. R & K Catering
. Fete Des Lacs - loth Year
. Farmers Insurance opened in old Grange building
· LaMotte Store renovation and five new business tenants
. Numerous new ordinances
· Garage Sale Days - over 100 homes involved
· New trail into Laurie LaMotte Park from the Anoka County Parks Reserve
· Acorn Creek Park new playground equipment and trail
. Royal Meadows Park new playground equipment
. New landscaping at all parks
· New City employees - Earl Fleischman, Laura Thompson and Chris Sweeney
. Restructuring of Administrative staff
· Resignation of Employees - Diane Ward, Aimee Fairbrother, and Tim Danielson
· 54 new homes - additional 195 building permits
. New park and ride at old Public Works building (1694 Sorel)
· Public Warks and Centennial Lakes Police Substation moved into former Eagle
Trucking building
. Audit report of City finances finds City doing great job in managing the City's money
. LeJournal Newspaper
· Centennial Lakes Police Department
. Proposed Pheasant Marsh development - 77 homes
· Northern Forest Products future 25,000 square foot expansion
. Automotive Driveline future 4,000 square foot expansion
. Baseball Stadium (Socko)
. Water interconnect with Lino Lakes
. Willow Glen Subdivision exploring expansion
. Center Villa Subdivision
. New building for Goetz Landscaping
· Grand Opening of the redesigned Anoka County Regional Park (BeachlTrails/Boat
Launching Pad)
· Centennial Fire Department - 65 foot ladder truck and pumper, six wheeler for
fighting brush fires and a hand held thermal imaging unit
· Sheehy Construction possible future donation of 15 acres to the City - possible trail,
water tower location, additional park or preserve area
. Lloyd Drilling proposed 10,000 to 20,000 square foot commercial building on Main
Street between Peterson Trail and Shad Avenue
Mayor Wilharber thanked Staff and Council for their diligent efforts on behalf of the City during
the year.
V. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
I. December 13, 2000 Meeting Minutes
Page 2 of9
Mayor Wilharber requested the following modifications: Page 6 change reference to
Council Member Nelson concerning park dedication fee to Mayor Wilharber. Also on
Page 6 indicate that Mr. Lundblad and Mr. Schoeberlein are connected to sewer but not
to water.
Mayor Wilharber requested Mr. March to include adjournment times and motions made
subsequent to the Executive Session on page 14.
Motion by Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Sweeney to
approve the December 13. 2000. City Council Meetinl! Minutes with requested
modifications. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
The City ofCenterville December 14. through December 27.2000
Motion by Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Broussard
Vickers to approve the expenditures for the City from December 14. 2000 throul!h
December 27. 2000. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Centennial Fire District Expenses
Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Nelson to
approve the Centennial Fire District Expenditures checks #12458 - 12472 in the
amount of $4.641.09. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
VII. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS
7121 Centerville Road - Mr. Mike Baron & Mrs. Pat Camp-Baron
This item was postponed while waiting for the arrival of Mr. Baron and Mrs. Camp-
Baron.
6939 Centerville Road - Mr. Dale Greenwaldt
Council reviewed a memo submitted by staff indicating that Mr. Greenwaldt had
contacted City Hall requesting reimbursement for a telephone repair submitted to him by
his tenants at 6939 Centerville Road. A copy of the bill was forwarded to City Engineer,
Tom Peterson to determine whether the damages were related to the Hunter's Crossing
project or Met Council project.
Mayor Wilharber requested that Staff research this item further and report back to
Council.
Motion by Mayor Wilharber. seconded bv Council Member Travis to table this item
until further reseach has been completed. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
Page 3 of9
7128 Progress Road - Ms. Anita Underwood
Council reviewed a memo submitted by Staff concerning a request received from Ms.
Underwood in regards to a Non-sufficient Funds check issued to the City. The City
charged Ms. Underwood's utility account a $25 administrative fee and Ms. Underwood is
requesting that the $25 fee be waived. Ms. Underwood's letter states that she mistakenly
issued a check to the City from an account that had previously been closed and is on a
very limited income.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded bv Council Member
Nelson to waive the $25 administrative fee assessed to Ms. Underwood's account.
All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
Additional Office Upgrade (Storage Cabinets and Countertop)/Council Chambers Wall
Insulation
Mr. March presented a quote to Council for insulating the outside wall of the Council
Chambers.
Mr. March explained that Staff wished to purchase standard cabinets and countertops
from Menards or Home Depot to assist with organization and preparation of meeting
packets in the copier area. Staff estimates the entire upgrade would cost approximately
$1,500.
Mayor Wilharber stated it was unfortunate that Council Chambers had been painted. The
wall is cold, however, the estimate seems high for insulating one wall. Mayor Wilharber
requested additional information on pricing for the standard cabinets and countertops.
Motion bv Mavor Wilharber, seconded bv Council Member Nelson to direct Staffto
obtain orkin!!: information for the standard cabinets and countertops and provide
the additional information to Council for further discussion. All in favor. Motion
carried unanimouslv.
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated she did not believe Council Chambers was
used frequently enough to justify the expense to insulate the wall.
Mr. March noted due to the way the thermostat is wired in the Administrative offices, the
heat is either on in the office area or Council Chambers, not both. Mr. March also noted
the City has two and a half (2 v,) gallons of paint remaining that could be utilized to
repaint the wall if the insulation project is approved.
Motion bv Mavor Wilharber. seconded bv Council Member Travis to table this
matter for future discussion. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Page 4 of9
Downtown Snow Removal
Mr. March explained that a problem exists with snow removal along Centerville Road
and the sidewalks abutting same. Mr. March stated that Anoka County maintains
Centerville Road and due to the recent heavy snowfall, the snow has been piling onto the
curb and sidewalk area near downtown businesses. Mr. March stated that this possess a
problem with school children waiting for the bus in this area. Mr. March stated that he
contacted Anoka County regarding this issue and they acknowledge there was a problem
and expressed a willingness to discuss the issue further. Mr. March proposed that the
City remove the snow and bill the County for same. The City would remove the snow for
heavy snow falls, not for small amounts of 2 inches or less.
Mayor Wilharber stated he was concerned for setting a precedent of removing snow for
some business owners but not others. Mayor Wilharber questioned whether business
owners could be asked to contribute to the cost of the snow removal.
Mr. March stated that the City removes snow on the west side of the street as it has been
declared a walking path by previous Council action. The current problem exists because
children are walking on the east side and standing under Kelly's awning waiting for the
bus.
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated she would like to have the City remove the
snow and request reimbursement from Anoka County. Mr. March stated that Anoka
County was receptive to same.
Council Member Nelson stated she did not believe business owners should have to pay
for snow removal if the County is plowing snow onto their property.
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated the City should remove the snow because it is
a hazard for pedestrians and focus on setting a policy on how to handle future snow
removal.
Mr. March questioned the City's liability for picking and choosing when to remove snow
from the sidewalk. Mr. Hoeft stated that the City has immunity for discretionary acts. If
the City sets a policy on how, when, and where the snow will be removed and the policy
is based on safety, health, welfare, and costs the City would be granted discretionary
immunity under the statute.
Mayor Wilharber stated he believed the City should remove the snow and work to set a
policy for future snow removal.
Mr. Palzer stated that the City possesses a small snowblower that would fit on that
sidewalk.
Mr. Hoeft questioned whether the sidewalk was on private property or in the City right-
of-way. Mr. Palzer stated that the sidewalk was on private property. Mr. Hoeft stated
that property owners are responsible for snow removal on sidewalks. The fact that
Anoka County is plowing snow onto the sidewalk is an issue between the property owner
Page 5 of9
and the County. However, as there is a safety issue involved for the children, the City
needs to look at removing the snow.
Mr. Hoeft stated that the City needed to obtain permission to remove snow in the County
right-of-way. The City could also consider removing the snow and assessing the property
owners for same.
Motion bv Council Member Nelson, seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to direct Citv Staff to remove the snow in case of emere:encv and to table
discussion on the matter until Staff obtains more information on the issue. All in
favor. Motion carried unanimously.
EDC Vacancies
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to approve the appointment of Aimee Fairbrother to the Economic
Development Committee. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Mr. Baron and Mrs. Camp-Baron arrived and addressed Council. Mrs. Camp-Baron
expressed her displeasure with City Staff as she was told she would be sent an agenda
and was not. Mr. March noted the City Clerk had spoken to her and he was unaware that
she had not received the requested agenda.
Mrs. Camp-Baron explained she and her husband have an ongoing dispute with their
neighbor. There have been numerous complaints generated by her neighbor. She noted
her family has owned the property for 25 years and she questions whether the ordinance
change would apply to them. The letter from the City indicated she was in violation of
Ordinance #4 for outside storage. She explained she has currently licensed and operating
vehicles on her property and as she has three lots should be allowed to have the six (6)
vehicles. Mrs. Camp-Baron indicated she and her husband are pursuing trespass charges
against the neighbor for trespassing onto their property and taking pictures. She also
stated they have begun proceedings to commence a harassment lawsuit against the
neighbor.
Mayor Wilharber explained the dispute with the neighbor is a civil issue.
Council Member Broussard Vickers explained that ordinances and ordinance changes
apply to all residents no matter the length of time a person has owned the property.
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated she would like to see the original letter from
the City indicating what part of the ordinance was being violated. Mrs. Camp-Baron
presented the letter to Council Member Broussard Vickers.
Mayor Wilharber noted the letter was sent to the property owners on November 13, 2000.
Mrs. Camp-Baron stated she has six (6) vehicles parked outside and believes she should
be able to keep them as she has three lots, two (2) vehicles per lot.
Page 6 of9
Mayor Wilharber inquired as to whether the property was under one (I) property
identification number. Mrs. Camp-Baron indicated the property was under two (2)
property identification numbers.
Mr. Hoeft indicated that the Barons are in violation of the ordinance as the vehicles need
to be licensed, operational and parked on a driveway. The piles of debris will also need
to be removed. Mrs. Camp-Baron stated the piles of debris are wood to be used for the
fence they are in the process of building.
Council Member Nelson stated the condition of the Barons' property would concern her
if she were the next door neighbor. She then suggested Mrs. Camp-Baron review the
fence ordinance for the special requirements for comer lots before constructing the fence.
Mrs. Camp-Baron indicated she and her husband are asking Council for permission to
keep the six (6) vehicles as they feel they are entitled as tax paying residents to keep the
vehicles they currently have. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the
ordinance requires vehicles to be in an approved garage or storage building or parked on
a permitted driveway. If the property had three driveways, one for each lot, the six
vehicles would be allowed. There is a variance procedure for residents to ask for special
permission for situations outside of the ordinance. However, there are specific criteria set
by state law that need to be met in order for the City to allow the variance. Looking at
the situation, there is no way the City could grant a variance.
Mrs. Camp-Baron stated she pays her bills and her taxes and does not feel the City has
the right to tell her how many vehicles she can have on her property. City Attorney Hoeft
indicated the City does have the right to limit the number of vehicles a property owner
can have under state law. At this point, the Barons have been noticed that they are in
violation of the ordinance and if the property is not cleaned up and brought into
compliance they can be cited.
Mayor Wilharber noted that in one of the pictures it appeared the trees hung out over the
sidewalk. He inquired ifthe Barons had cut them back. Mrs. Camp-Baron indicated they
had been cut back.
Mrs. Camp-Baron noted the City had damaged their concrete retaining wall with a street
sweeper. She inquired as to when the City would be paying to repair it.
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated Council would need to hear from Staff
concerning the damage to the concrete wall.
Mrs. Camp-Baron requested the City make an appointment to inspect the property as she
and her husband have instructed the police to arrest anyone found on their property
regardless of the reason.
Mayor Wilharber stated the Barons were to clean up the property and directed Mr. Palzer
to make an appointment with them for an inspection.
Page 7 of9
2001 Engineering Rates
Motion bv Council Member Travis, seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to accept the 2001 Engineering Rates as presented. All in favor. Motion
carried unanimously.
Union Contract Negotiations
This item was removed for discussion at an executive session immediately following the
regular meeting.
Cable Operator Pav Increase Request
Council reviewed a letter from Patricia Scott requesting a pay increase from $10 per hour
with a three hour minimum to $13 per hour with a three (3) hour minimum.
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to approve a pav increase to $12.50 per hour with a three (3) hour
minimum.
Council Member Travis noted he was opposed to the increase to $12.50 per hour as he
believes Ms. Scott is invaluable to the City and deserves the increase to $13 per hour.
Vote: Ayes - 2 (Nelson/Broussard Vickers). Nays - 3 (Wilharber/Travis/Sweeney).
Motion failed.
Motion bv Council Member Travis, seconded bv Council Member Sweeney to
approve a pav increase to $13 per hour with a three (3) hour minimum. All in
favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
X. CONSENT AGENDA
Successful Completion of Year 2 (Clerk/Treasurer. Teresa Bender) Recommended Step
Increase from Step 1 to Step 2
Motion bv Council Member Nelson, seconded bv Council Member Sweeney to
approve the increase for Teresa Bender from Step 1 to Step 2. All in favor. Motion
carried unanimously.
Xl. COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council Member Travis reported the EDC had requested clarification on the proposed
changes to the sign ordinance.
Council Member Sweeney reminded Council a new Council Member will need to be
appointed as the cable commission liaison.
Page 80f9
Mayor Wilharber reported that Council would need to appoint a liaison to the police
commission.
Council Member Nelson thanked Mayor Wilharber for his ten years of service to the
City.
Mayor Wilharber left the meeting at 7:10 p.m.
City Attorney Hoeft left the meeting at 7:10 p.m.
XII. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
None.
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Nelson to
recess to the Executive Session at 7:13 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
Motiou bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to close the Executive Session at 7:28 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Sweeney to
adiourn the December 27. 2000 City Council Meetinl! at 7:29 p.m. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimously.
Transcribed by:
Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
Page 9 of9
.",
'.'j
Not Approved
CENTERVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
JANUARY 16, 2001
Pursuant to due call and notice thereot: the Centerville Economic Development Committee held their
regularly scheduled meeting on January 16, 200 I at City Hall, 1880 Main Street.
Present:
Chairperson Tim Rehbine
Betsy Scheller
Paul Montain (departed at 7:30 p,m.)
Michelle Moser
Aimee Fairbrother
Absent:
D~kTmvis(Councilliaiso~
Lori Dom
Staff:
Kris Sweeney
APPEARANCES
Mr, Todd Murawski, Wargo Nature Center arrived at 7:00 p,rn. He briefly discussed Snow Day activities
at the Wargo Nature Center on January 27, 200L Mr. Murawski slated that the dog sled rides would not
be attending the Snow Day, and if desired, EDC would still be willing to sponsor another event. The
committee discussed that they are willing to sponsor another event and/or donate money for prizes not to
exceed $100. One of the committee members mentioned a box for the drawings and requested that
Wargo Nature Center provide the same.
Mr. Murawski departed at 7:20 p.m.
Mr. Montain, Trio Inn, donated $100 cash to EDC to use as at their discretion for the Snow Day events.
A motion was made by Mr. Montain to donate $100 to Wargo Nature Center's Snow Day events,
seconded by Ms. Scheller. All in favor. Motioned carried unanimously.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Tim Rehbine called the meeting to order at 7:20 p.rn.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A motion was made by Mr. Montain to approve the December 19, 2000 Economic Development
Committee Meeting minutes, seconded by Ms. Fairbrother. Ms. Moser abstained. Motion was
carried.
"
'-
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Design Team - "Ideas in Action"
No report was given.
Downtown Revitalization
Mr. Montain spoke with Mr. DeVine regarding the petition. He stated that Mr. DeVine commented that
he was one signature away in completing the petition for City services, water, and streetscaping for the
downtown area. Mr. Montain felt that this petition was important to the downtown revitalization because
if they were going be tearing up the streets and sidewalks to complete this project this would be an ideal
time to do the streetscape and sidewalks. Mr. Rehbine's thought on this was that this would be a good
motivational item on the agenda, but after the petition was turned in.
Ms. Capra stated that the Council members would be attending all committee meetings next month to
discuss committee goals, objectives and communications of each committee.
Historical
No report was given.
Star City Goals
There was discussion held regarding the coupons that are to be handed out at Wargo Nature Center
during the Snow Day events. Mr. Rehbine commented on the winter carnival and working with Wargo
during the Snow Day is a good start.
Vote for Chair and Vice Chair
Ms. Dorn submitted a letter ofresignation to EDC.
A letter of interest from Mr. Rick Terway was submitted and voted on. Ms. Fairbrother stated that Mr.
Terway would be a good asset to EDC being that he has 20 years experience working in government.
A motion was made by Ms. Scheller to accept Mr. Rick Terway letter of interest. Ms. Fairbrother
seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
A new chair a vice chair were elected.
A motion was made by Ms. Scheller to nominate Ms. Fairbrother as Chair. Ms. Moser seconded
the motion. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Ms. Fairbrother accepted the nomination as all as it was for one year.
A motion was made by Ms. Moser to nominate Ms. ScheUer as Vice Chair. Ms. Fairbrother
seconded the motion. AU in favor. Motion carried unanimonsly.
Ms. Scheller accepted the nomination.
..
'.;
Business and Citizen of the Year Award and Lifetime Achievement Awards
(NOTE: The nomination form was put in the Le Journal by staff on 1-17-01 before it went to the mail)
Ms. Capra suggested putting an ad in the Quad for the nomination form for Citizen/Business of the Year
and Life Time Achievement Award. Mr. Rehbine stated that not everyone read that paper. Consensus
was to put in the nomination form in the Le Journal which is distributed to all Centerville residents.
A discussion was held by the committee members to investigate the price of a flyer in the Hugonian, put
an ad on the City sign and cable channel. The deadline for the nomination forms is February 16, 2001.
Draft Busioess Survey
Ms. Capra suggested that EDC review the Star City Survey at the next meeting. Ms. Scheller stated that
she was goiog to look up on the website (DTED) to see if this survey was available on line.
Ms. Capra departed at 8:10 p.m.
NEW BUSINESS
Ms. Fairbrother suggested that EDC could put out a business trivia questionnaire and have prizes for the
winners.
Mr. Rehbioe mentioned briefly the Business Appreciation Dinner that is in May.
ADJOURNMENT
Meetiog adjourned at 8:17 p.m No motion was made.
Respectfully submitted:
~ Sweeney
City Staff
-"-,
,
CENTERVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 19, 2000
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof; the Centerville Economic Development Committee held their
regularly scheduled meeting on December 19, 2000 at City Hall,
1880 Main Street.
Present:
Chairperson Tim Rehbine
Committee Member Lori Dom
Committee Member Betsy Scheller
Committee Member Mary Capra
Committee Member Paul Montain
Dick Travis (Council liaison)
Absent:
Committee Member Michelle Moser
Staff:
Kris Sweeney
APPEARANCES
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Tim Rehbine called the meeting to order at approximately 7:00 p.rn.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion bv Ms. Scheller, seconded bv Ms. Capra to aplI.<lVe the November 21, 2000, Economic
Development Committee Medin!!: Minntes. Mr. Montain and Ms. Dom abstained. Motion
carried.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Design Team - "Ideas in Action"
Ms. Capra spoke with Mayor WIlharber recently regarding the status of the old fire truck that is being
stored at the old public works building.
Ms. Dom asked Ms. Capra about the historical markers. Ms. Capra stated she has not received a
response from Anoka County regarding this matter.
...
Downtown Revitalization
Mr. Montain mentioned downtown revitalization and commented on water and sewer services coming to
the area. He also mentioned the petition Mr. DeVine had distnbnted regarding the same and it's
attractiveness for businesses coming into the area. A comment was made in regards to involving EDC
and businesses in downtown revitalization and the visions of Downtown Revitalization Connnittee.
Star City Goals
The upcoming Wargo Nature Center's Snow Daze was mentioned. Ms. Scheller stated that she had
spoke with Todd Murawski, Wargo Nature Center, regarding same. She mentioned that EDC could
sponsor an event. EDC could provide funds for dog food and gas for the transportation of the dogs for
the dog sled rides. Ms. Scheller stated that Mr. Murawski said that in 1999 approximately 200 people
attended this event and 92% of same were residents of the area. Some of the options Mr. Murawski
mentioned were sponsoring dog sled rides (the cost $75 - $100 for the event) or snow sculpting events
and/or prize money.
Ms. Scheller also mentioned that EDC could hang a banner at the Snow Daze event and distribute flyers
that contained coupons from local businesses at the businesses that had foot traffic.
Mr. Rehbine was in fuvor of sponsoring the dog sled rides.
Ms. Capra concurred with Ms. Scheller's flyer suggestion.
A motion was made by Ms. Capra to sponsor the dog sled ride for $100 and banners not to exceed
$200. Motion died for lack of second.
Ms. Scheller stated that County Bank was participating in the event and sponsoring cookies. Ms. Capra
suggested that Ms. Scheller speak with Mr. Magill in regards to sponsoring gas coupons. Mr. Montain
offered to donate prize money on behalf of the Trio Inn.
A motion was made by Mr. Rehbine to sponsor the dog sled rides up to $100 and to have a banner
made but not to exceed $200, and to cover the cost of the flyers and coupons. Seconded by Ms.
Dorn. All in favor. Motioned carried unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS
Bv-laws
The by-laws were briefly discussed. Ms. Capra mentioned that she would like to see all by-laws for all
connnittees to be standardized with a list of connnittee duties attached.
Term of Office
The terms of office were briefly discussed and consensus was that the Chair and Vice Chair positions
were a one (1) year term.
Ms. Aimee Fairbrother was present and the meeting and submitted a letter of interest for one (1) of the
EDC vacancies.
r
A motion was made by Ms. Scheller to accept Ms. Fairbrother's letter of interest, seconded by Mr.
Rehbine. All in favor. Motioned carried unanimously.
Vote a Chairoerson and Vice Chair
Consensus was to vote for the positions of Chair and Vice Chair at the January meeting and forward
recommendations to Council.
Mr. Magill submitted a letter of resignation. The committee wanted to express their appreciation to him
for his years of service and would like to leave an open invitation to return ifhe chooses.
Proposed Sign Ordinance #39
The proposed Sign Ordinance #39 was discussed and consensus was that clarification was needed in
regards to size requirements. The committee requested that Planning and Zoning discuss the planning
stages of the ordinance and its contents.
A motion was made by Ms. Capra to recommend to Council that Ordinance #39 be tabled for
clarification on the percentage of the size of the sign. Mr. Rebbine seconded. All in favor.
Motioned carried unanimously.
Business and Citizen of the Y ear Award and Lifetime Achievement Awards
There was brief discussion. An application form is to be submitted in the Le Journal and to all
committees.
Draft a Business Survey
Ms. Scheller drafted a business survey. It was discussed briefly.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion bv Mr. Rehbine, seconded bv Ms. Dorn to adiourn the December 19, 2000. EDC Meetine:.
All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Meeting adjourned at approximately 8:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
Kris Sweeney
City Staff
/ >>
NOT
APPROVED
PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
January 3,2001
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof; the Parks and Recreation Committee of the City
of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on January 3, 2001 at City Hall,
1880 Main Street. Chairperson Doug Porter called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m.
Present:
Chairperson Doug Porter
Karla DeVine
Wayne LeBlanc
Tedd Peterson
Absent:
Brian Walter
Staff:
Till Lien
APPEARANCES
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
December 6. 2000 Parks and Recreation Committee Meerinl[ Minutes
Motion by Mr. LeBlanc, seconded by Mr. Peterson to approve the December 6, 2000
Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes with noted corrections. AU in
favor. Motion carried unanimously.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Prooosed Trail Map
Ms. Lien explained that she had not received the updated Trail Map :from the engineers to
date. Ms. Lien will contact the engineers and update the committee at the February
meeting.
Trails Coordination Meeting for Northeast Metro
Mr. LeBlanc commented on the meeting that was held in November regarding the
Northeast Metro Trail was a success. There were representatives present :from all of the
surrounding communities and all came to a "shared" vision for the proposed trail. Mr.
LeBlanc also mentioned that he had spoke with Mayor Swedberg regarding the trail
goals. Mayor Swedberg suggested to Mr. LeBlanc the possibility ofrnnning a trail to the
Willow Glen Town Home Association, and continuing north on 20th Avenue, and then
east toward Hugo.
1
(,
Mr. LeBlanc commented that he would like to see the City build a boardwalk/fishing pier
on Centerville Lake by the DeFoe property and arn"n(l the Comp Plan to reflect the same.
Mr. LeBlanc requested :Ms. Lien to research the fees and requirements involved with
updating the Camp Plan.
YMCA Day Carn" DiscussionlRecommendations
After briefly discussing the YMCA Day Camp proposal, the following motion was made.
Motion by Mr. LeBlanc, seconded by Ms. DeVine, to recommend to Council to
approve the proposed YMCA Day Camp at Laurie LaMotte Park; contingent upon
special activities offered by the City. AU in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
There was brief discussion amongst the committee regarding the proposed Skate Park and
the possible involvement of the YMCA.
The committee requested a financial statement from Ms. Bender (Treasurer) indicating all
of the funds available to the Parks and Recreation Committee for the 2001 year.
Grants offered by the DNR
After discussion, the fullowing motion was made;
Motion by Mr. Peterson, seconded by Ms. DeVine to authorize Mr. Porter to speak
with Mr. March on behalf of the Parks and Recreation Committee regarding
updating and submitting grant applications for programs/grants offered by the
DNR. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS
Centennial Hockey Association Financial Commitment
Mr. Peterson explained he had requested this be added to the agenda due to some issues
that have risen at the ice rink with the Centennial Hockey Association (CHA). Mr.
Peterson questioned if there was a financial contribution made by the CRA, or, more
specifically, is there a contract or obligation that the City has to this league? The
Committee concurred that the City doesn't have any type of contract or legal obligation
to the CHA. Mr. Peterson explained that at the end of each night, the rink attendants
request that the kids that have used the rink that day help clean the rink edges off. The
local youth that use the rink are always willing to help, since it gives them a sense of
ownership. The CHA isn't willing to help maintain the rink, and in fact left one of the
rink attendants feeling bad when he had requested their assistance. Mr. Peterson
expressed his concerns that the local youth aren't able to use the rink for three hours a
day, three days a week due to the CHA using the rink for hockey practice. If the CRA
doesn't have a financial contribution to the rink., and they aren't willing to help maintain
the rink, why do they have priority over the rink? Mr. Porter offered to contl;1Ct the CHA
to discuss the agreement and responsibilities involved with the use of the rink.
2
,
Mr. Porter suggested the committee consider purchasing jackets for the rink attendants to
use while on duty. This would help in identifYing the rink attendant amongst the
residents using the rink.
The committee requested Ms. Lien order jackets for the Parks and Recreation Committee
along with the fullowing motion:
Motion by Mr. Porter, seconded by Mr. Peterson to approve funding for four (4)
rink attendant jackets bearing the City Logo, also to incJude "Parks & Roc."; with
an amollnt not to exceed $250.00. AU in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Familv Skate Nirdlt
After brief discussion, the committee elected to provide hot chocolate, juice and popcorn
at the Family Skate Nights, which were determined to be held on the following dates:
Sunday, January 14, 2001
Saturday, January 27,2001
Sunday, February 11, 2001
Sunday, February 25, 2001
4:00 - 6:00 p.rn.
4:00 - 6:00 p.rn.
4:00 - 6:00 p.rn.
4:00 - 6:00 p.rn.
The committee requested Ms. Lien to put the above information on the cable access
channel.
Letter from Mavor Swedberg
Ms. Lien explained a letter submitted by Mayor Swedberg requesting a "Council
Workshop with Committees." Specifically, the entire council will be attending all of the
committee meetings in the month of February to discuss the goals, objectives and
communications of each committee.
Activities Director
Brief discussion among the committee entailed related to the possibility ofhiring an
Activities Director. No decisions were made at this time.
Electricity at Laurie LaMotte Park
Ms. DeVine had requested this be added to the agenda due to the fact that she was
preparing to approach the council on behalf of the Parks and Recreation Committee to
request the City's :financial assistance in rnnning electricity at LaMotte Park. The Parks
and Recreation COIilmittee is looking for electricity at LaMotte Park for the following
purposes: lighting ofban fields, soccer fields, score board, pleasure rink, proposed
concession stand, Fete des Lacs activities, etc. Ms. DeVine will submit the request to
council at the next meeting.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
3
L
,
Parks and Recreation Monthly Renort to Patricia Scott rLeJournal)
The committee directed Ms. DeVine to update Ms. Scott with the fonowing information
for the LeJourna1: Skate rink hours, Family Skate Nights, Achievements of the Parks and
Recreation Committee in the year 2000 and Goals fur the Parks and Recreation
Committee for the year 2001.
February A1renda
1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Updating (timeframe, cost, procedures, etc.)
2. YMCA Update
3. Grants Update
4. Centennial Hockey Association Update
5. Jackets for Rink Attendants and Parks and Recreation Members
6. Budget Figures / Re-assessment
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Mr. Porter, seconded by Mr. LeBlanc to adjourn the January 3, 2001
Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.rn.
Respectfully Submitted,
fill Lien
Staff Liaison
4
Page 1 of2
Jim March
To: City Council
Subject: Week in Review
Week in Review
Janumy 26. 2001
Building Permits this Period = 2
Bui/ding Permits YTD = 5
New Homes Year to Date = 2
*****A~~A~AAAAAAALLLAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLAAAA.ALALLALAALLLAA*AAAAAAAALLLLLALALLLLAAAAALAAALLLAlLlL***AAAAAAAA*****
. Tomorrow is Snow Days at Wargo Nature Center from 10:00 to 1 :00. EDC has put
together a flyer promoting Centerville's businesses. The flyer will be distributed at this
event.
. The Lion's Ice Fishing Contest is scheduled for February 10th. Volunteers are needed.
Registration is in Waterworks parking lot. The fee is $5 per entrant. There will be several
great prizes. The contest runs from 12:00 to 3:00 with registration beginning at 11 :30.
. If you are interested in attending the Lion's Cadillac Dinner you need to act immediately.
Only eighty tickets are sold for the event. At the meeting last night, it was discovered that
there are only two or three unsold tickets left. The event did not sell out last year, but it
looks like this year is a different story. The dinner is scheduled for February 24th at the
Hugo Legion.
. The Fete des Lacs committee is meeting next week Monday at 6:30 at City Hall. It has
been announced that Centerville will be the host for a 32 team MRA regional softball
tournament. Last years tournament was just organized and advertised locally. Being
chosen as a site for a regional tournament could attract three times as many softball
players than what we had last year.
. The Council has a goals workshop scheduled for next week Wednesday at City Hall.
. Chicilo Homes was given site plan approval for an approximate 12,000 square foot
industrial building. The building will be constructed on Lot 5 in the Royal Industrial Park.
Chicilo Homes will occupy 25% of the building and they also have anotner tenant that
manufactures the razor blades used on arrows that will occupy another 25% of the
building.
. Lloyd Drilling received site plan approval for his proposed commercial building located on
Main Street across from City Hall. There are still several details to be worked out before a'
1/26/01
Page 1 of2
Jim March
From: Jim March [jmarch@goldengate.netj
Friday, January 19, 2001 10:31 AM
Wayne LeBlanc; Tom Peterson; Tim Swedberg; Theresa Brenner; Terry Sweeney; Ray Devine;
Patricia Scott; Michelle Moser; Mary Capra; Mari Nelson; Lori Dam; Linda Broussard Vickers; John
McLean; Jim Hoeft; Hanna Tilsen; Elizabeth Scheller; Doug Porter; Dick Travis; Dave Kilian; Brian
Walter; Brian Hanson; Barry Brainard; Aimee Fairbrother; Tom Wilharber
Subject: Week in Review
Sent:
To:
Week in Review
January 19, 2001
Building Permits this Period = 2
Building Permits YTD = 3
New Homes Year to Date = 1
*******************************************A~~AALAAA.*******************************************AAAAAAA
. The Board of Review has been set for April 11th. This is the meeting that is held to
contact the County Assessor about your property valuation concerns.
. Garage Sale Days is scheduled for May 18th and May 19th. We have had several calls
from residents wanting to know the dates for this year's event. It keeps getting bigger and
bigger each year.
. The Fete des Lacs committee has held their first meeting. They plan to have their
regular meetings on the third Monday of the month.
. Aimee Fairbrother has been elected as the new chair of the EDC. Lori Dorn has
submitted her resignation to EDC. Rick Terway is being recommended to Council to fill a
current vacancy on this commitltee.
. Laura Thompson has resigned her position with the City to accept a full-time position at a
local bank. Joel McPherson has indicated that he would accept the vacancy in the public
works department if approved by Council. Joel had worked with Tedd Peterson in St. Paul
for several years. He was the next highest ranked candidate when interviews were last
conducted.
. A petition has been delivered to City Hall requesting that City water and streetscape
enchancements be made to the downtown area. This is the next required step in downtown
revitalization. This item will be on the next Council agenda. The Council will have to
consider having a formal feasibility study completed/updated by the City Engineer for this
project.
. The block commercial building located south of Ro-So Contracting has a new owner. He
plans to expand the existing building and possibly add an additional commercial building to
1/19/01
Page 2 of2
the site in the future.
. I have been in contact with a member of the Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation
Board. They are working with the City of Uno Lakes on a grant application for funding to
conduct a natural resource inventory for the City of Lino Lakes. I am sending a letter of
support for this grant application. I am told that Centerville would be included in the natural
resource inventory study at no charge to the City, if the grant is funded.
. Mayor Swedberg has announced that the City of Lexington is having a meeting with their
City Attorney to discuss the Open Meeting Law. They have invited any Council or
Committee member to attend this meeting that is interested. The meeting is scheduled for
7:00 on January 23rd at Lexington City Hall.
Please let me know if you have an interest in attending this training.
. Enjoy your weekend!
1/19/01
Page 1 of2
Jim March
To: WIR Subscribers
Subject: Week in Review
Week in Review
December 29, 2000
Building Permits this Period = 0
Building Permits YTD = 196
New Homes Year to Date = 54
*******~***********************************************AAAAAAAA**********************************************
* We have just been notified that Christmas trees will be picked up curbside by Waste
Management on January 12 and January 19th.
* The final levy was certified to Anoka County yesterday.
* We have had only a couple of snowmobile complaints so far this year. I have heard that
Hugo is having lots of problems with snowmobile complaints. Several riders have stopped
in to City Hall to pick up a copy of our ordinance. I spoke to Doug Koppy (Rice Creek Trail
Association) yesterday. He indicated that they would like to have another meeting at City
Hall during mid-January to further educate riders.
* Aimee Fairbrother has been appointed to the Economic Development Committee. There
is still one vacancy on the committee yet to be filled.
* A call was received at City Hall yesterday inquiring about having a new traffic study
completed on Main Street. The caller indicated that they were looking to site a fast food
restaurant. They are going to contact Anoka County in regards to having them perform a
study.
* The unusual heavy snowfall has not created too many problems in regards to
snowplowing. However, due to the large snow amounts in the yards water utility bills will
be estimated for the fourth quarter. This has been done twice before in heavy snowfall
seasons.
* The Centerville Lions will be sponsoring a youth and adult ice fishing contest on
Centerville lake on February 10th. The event will be held from 12:00 to 3:00. Food will be
served. Registration will only be five dollars and many prizes will be awarded. Watch for
posters to come out in the next week.
. The Centerville Council transition is well underway. The new Council is planning a
workshop prior to the first meeting on January 10th. The new Council will be discussing
goals for the next year and Council's method of operation and organization. The Council
12/29/00
Page 2 of2
plans to meet with each committee in February of 2001.
* Have a safe and enjoyable New Years!
12/29/00
City ofCenterville Nomination Form
City rlj Centerville CitizenIBusiness Person of the Year/Lifetime Achievement Award.
Nomination for (please check one) OCitizen
Name of Nominee:
Address:
OBusiness
Phone:
OLifetime Achievement
If nominating someone for the Lifetime Achievement Award in memory of; please list name of living spouse or
relative thatmay be contacted for further infurmation:
Name:
Address:
Phone:
Please check the organizations or groups this individual is associated with and write the name of committee that
this person is actively involved in. If not listed, please write the name of organization in the OTIffiR co.lumn.
City of Centerville Committee:
o Local Organization:
o Local Organization:
o School:
o Church:
o Other:
o Other:
o Other:
Please list below the tasks that this individual has accomplisbed during this past year/lifetime for Lifetime
Achievement Award that have been ofbenefu to our City and it's residents:
(If you need additional space, please feel free to attach a separate sheet ofpaper.)
Are there any other :factors you feel may be important to consider regarding this nominee?
Nominated by
Address:
Date:
Phone:
Nominations tue due by February 16, 2001 and can be placed in the drop box located in the parking lot at City HalL