HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-12-05 P &Z Agenda
tervi{{e
uta6{isfied 1857
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMITTEE
MEETING AGENDA
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2000
6:30 p.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call
II. PUBLIC HEARING (S)
I. Ground Development (Preliminary Plat -PUD)
2. Lloyd Drilling (Re-Zone-1873 Main Street)
III. APPEARANCES
I. Mr. Terry Sager - Mini-Storage
IV. OLD BUSINESS
V. NEW BUSINESS
1. Ground Development (Preliminary Plat-PUD)
2. Lloyd Drilling (Re-Zone-1873 Main Street)
3. Ordinance #4 Amendments
4. Sign Ordinance
VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS
VD. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
1. November 14,2000 Meeting Minutes
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
(
.
.
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
Yard, Front - A yard extending across the full width of the front lot between side lot lines
and extending from the abutting street right-of-way line to a depth required in the yard
regulations of the district in which such lot is located. On a corner lot the street address or
narrowest street dimension or the street shall be the front yard.
Yard, Rear - A yard extending along a side lot line between the front and rear yard lot line,
having a width as specified in the yard regulations for the district in which such lot is
located.
Yard, Side - A yard between the sideline of the lot and the nearest line of the building and
extending from the front yard to the rear yard.
Zoning District - An area or areas for which the regulations and requirements governing
use, lot and bulk of buildings and premises are uniform.
Section 015-030: General Regulations.
For clarity and consistency in the understanding and application of this Ordinance the
following shall apply;
Use of the masculine gender includes the feminine and neuter genders unless otherwise
specifically noted.
Grammatical use of references made in the singular shall include the plural and the
plural shall include the singular, unless such use or reference is otherwise specifically
stated.
Sentence construction or phraseology in the present tense, and similarly, references in the
future tense may include the present.
The word "shall" is used to mean mandatory, whereas the word "may" is permissive and
does not imply obligation.
The catch lines of the sections of this Ordinance are intended as mere catchwords to
indicate the content of the section, and shall not be deemed or taken to be titles of such
sections, nor be deemed to govern, limit, modify or in any manner affect the scope,
meaning or intent of the provisions of any sections.
Division 20: Scope and Interpretation
A. Scope
No structure, or part, thereof, shall be erected, converted, enlarged,
reconstructed, altered or moved without a permit approved by the
City. No structure or land shall be used for any purpose or altered in
any manner that is not in conformity with the provisions of this
Page 14 of62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
the application with the City's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, other policies and
official controls and the compatibility of the proposed action with existing area land uses,
existing area investments and neighborhood character, capacity of public streets and
utilities and future planned land uses.
Section 070.030: Exceptions. The City may waive certain submittal requirements for
residential variance applications, when it is determined that submittal requirements are not
applicable or are not necessary to complete a review of the proposed action. The City may
also waive certain submittal requirements for other actions, when site plan information for
the subject property has previously been submitted to the City and may be more
appropriately supplemented with new information.
Division 75: Final Grading and LandscaDina
Lots in all districts shall be subject to the following:
Subd. 1
No Occupancy Permit shall be issued until the lot upon which
the structure is constructed is brought to finished grade as
specified; and
Subd.2
Within six (6) months from the issuance of the Occupancy
Permit the lot shall be landscaped in a manner which prevents
erosion due to wind or water. Extensions may be granted at
the Building Official's discretion.
Division 80: Zonina Districts/Use Reaulations
Section 080-010: Zoning Map. A map entitled "Centerville Zoning Map" is hereby
adopted by reference and declared to be part of this Ordinance as the Official Zoning Map.
Such map shall be on permanent file and available for public inspection in the City Hall. It
shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain and keep the map up to date and to
record each amendment thereto within thirty (30) days after official publication of the
ordinance adopting the amendment.
Section 080-020: Interpretation of the Zoning Map. Where due to the scale, lack of
detail or illegibility of the Zoning Map attached hereto, there is an uncertainty, contradiction
or conflict as to the intended location of any zoning district boundary as shown thereon, the
Zoning Administrator shall make an interpretation of the map upon the request of any
person. Any person aggrieved by any such interpretation may appeal such interpretation to
the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments, in
interpreting the Zoning Map or deciding any appeal, shall apply to the fOllowing standards:
A. Zoning district boundary lines are intended to follow lot lines, or be
parallel or perpendicular thereto, or along the centerlines of streets,
rights-of-way or watercourses, unless such boundary lines are fixed
by dimensions shown on the Zoning Map; and
Page 21 of62
Effective 9/5/00
City or CenterviUe Ord. #4
B. Where zoning district boundary lines are so indicated that they
approximately follow lot lines, such lot lines shall be construed to be
such boundary lines; and
C. Where a zoning district boundary line divides a lot, the location of any
such zoning district boundary line, unless indicated by dimensions
shown on the zoning map, shall be determined by the use of the map
scale shown thereon; and
D. If, after the application of the foregoing rules, uncertainty still exists as
to the exact location of a zoning district boundary line, the boundary
line shall be determined in a reasonable manner, considering the
history of uses of the property and the history of zoning ordinances
and amendments in Centerville as well as other relevant facts.
Section 080-030: Establishment of Districts. For the purpose of this Ordinance, the City
of Centerville is hereby divided into the following zoning districts:
R-1 Rural Residential
R-2A High Density Single Family Residential
R-2 Single Family Residential
R-4 Single Family Manufactured Housing District
R-5 Single Family Residential - Estate
B-1 Commercial
1-1 Industrial Park District
P-1 Public/Institutional District
M-1 Mixed Use
Section 080-040: Rural Residential (R-1).
Purpose
The purpose of the R-1 District is to allow agricultural activities and non-sewered residential
dwellings as interim uses of the land. The City has limited vacant land for development and
all land in the City is planned for eventual urban uses. Because of the limited duration
anticipated for agricultural uses in the City and the incompatibilities which often exist
between agricultural and non-agricultural uses, permitted uses in the R-1 District will not
reflect intensive commercial agricultural uses.
Permitted Uses
A. Single-family, detached, dwellings at a density not exceeding one (1)
home per ten (10) acres; and
B. Residential accessory uses and home occupations; and
C. Crop production and vegetable gardening; and
Page 22 of 62
Effective 915/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
Special Requirements
Manufactured homes are permitted in all residential districts if they meet the design
criteria for such districts. All other manufactured homes shall be located only in
designated manufactured home districts which meet the requirements of this Ordinance.
The general intent of this district is to provide for manufactured housing in subdivided
developments, in safe, attractive residential neighborhoods with all urban services and
desired amenities as other residential areas. No person shall erect, establish, extend or
enlarge a manufactured housing development within the limits of the City of Centerville
without first obtaining Site Plan approval from the City Council upon receipt of the
recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Approval shall be granted only
upon compliance with all the following: 1.) Compliance with all other terms of this
Ordinance #4, Centerville Zoning Ordinance; 2.) Compliance with all the terms of
Ordinance #8, Centerville Subdivision Ordinance; 3.) The proposed development must be
located in the City's urban service area as shown in the Comprehensive Development Plan,
and must be served by public utilities as approved by the City of Centerville.
Section 080-080: Single-Family, Residential. Estate (R-S).
Purpose
It is intended that the R-5 District provide for low-density traditional single family residential
where public utilities are available and required for service. The design and circulation of
new residential areas are also intended to be complimentary with and enhance the
community's small town atmosphere.
Permitted Uses
A. Single-family, detached dwellings.
B. Accessory uses.
C. Public parks and recreation uses.
D. Day care facility.
E. Residential facility.
F. Home occupations.
Section 080-090: Commercial District (B-1).
Purpose
It is intended that the B-1 District provide opportunities for retail and service business uses
which require larger development sites, highway visibility or highway access.
Permitted Uses
A. Retail sales and service, but excluding adult orientated businesses.
Page 25 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
B. Automobile and motorized equipment sales and service, excluding
salvage operations.
C. Farm implement sales and service.
D. Building supply sales and storage yards.
E. Funeral homes and mortuaries.
F. Day care centers.
G. Hotels and motels.
H. Full service gasoline sales and service.
I. Eating and drinking establishments.
J. Financial institutions.
K. Personal and professional business offices.
L. Public buildings.
M. Barber/Beauty salons.
N. Commercial schools.
O. Hospitals and clinics.
P. Nursing homes.
Q. Commercial recreation.
R. Animal clinics.
S. Car washes.
T. Liquor stores.
Section 080-100: Industrial District (1-1).
Purpose
It is intended that the 1-1 District provide opportunities for light manufacturing and
industrial uses, trade businesses, machine shops and other more extensive land uses.
Page 26 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City ofCenterville Ord. #4
Permitted Uses
A. Business and professional offices.
B. Machine and repair shops.
C. Construction trade offices and yards.
D. Manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, processing, packaging,
assembly and research uses, except waste management.
E. Indoor shooting/archery range and sales.
F. Truck terminals.
Special Requirements
The storage of supplies, products, vehicles, equipment or other materials shall be kept
indoors unless totally screened from public rights of way and adjacent properties.
Adult orientated businesses are regulated separately by City Ordinance.
Section 080-110: Public/Institutional District (P-1).
Purpose
It is intended that the P-1 District provide opportunities for government facilities, schools,
churches, hospitals, libraries and other similar public and institutional uses.
Permitted Uses
A. Government buildings, structures, facilities, utilities, rights-of-way,
easements, parks, open spaces and vacant land.
B. Schools, churches, cultural and educational facilities and uses,
libraries, hospitals and health facilities.
Section 080-120: Mixed Use District (M-1).
Purpose
It is intended that the M-1 District provide for the unique layout and character of a
traditional central business district with retail, professional office, residential, and other
mixed uses.
Permitted Uses
A. Retail sales conducted within structures, but excluding automobile and
motorized equipment sales, truck stops, gasoline and fuel sales, drive
through restaurants.
B. Repair and service conducted within structures, but excluding
automobile and motorized equipment repair.
Page 27 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
Division 90: Parkin!:! Reauirements
The following table illustrates the minimum number of parking spaces required for various
uses permitted in the City. The City may modify minimum parking requirements in the M-1
District, as part of the Site Plan Approval process, if it is determined that the use is
consistent with the purpose of the district and street parking is sufficient to accommodate
the use.
Uses
Residential
Churches
Schools
ross floor area
ross floor area
ross floor area
ross floor area
Theaters
Restaurants
Offices
Retail
Convenience Stores
General Services
Trade Businesses
Manufacturin
Other Industrial
Car Washes
Drive-up
Restaurants
Division 95: Commercial Exterior Buildina Materials
Except; as otherwise regulated herein, the exterior wall surfaces of all new or expanded
commercial buildings shall consist of face brick, finished block or other textured masonry
product approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Exceptions to all masonry
exteriors may be considered and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission
provided the following findings are met:
A. The combination of exterior materials is used as an architectural
compliment to the structure.
B. The combination of exterior materials used is not inconsistent with
the quality and appearance used on similar buildings in the same
zoning district or neighborhood.
C. Site conditions limit public exposure to certain exterior surfaces where
masonry products are not proposed.
Page 29 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City ofCenterville Ord. #4
D. An exterior wall may be temporary and a future expansion area of a
structure and be subject to removal or redesign as an interior wall.
Buildings are required to have contrasting architectural features and must be designed to
be aesthetically pleasing.
Division 100: Industrial Exterior Buildina Materials
Industrial buildings are required to be constructed of brick, decorative block or approved
textured masonry product. Pole barn type buildings are not allowed. Buildings are required
to have contrasting architectural features and must be designed to be aesthetically
pleasing.
Division 105: Fences
A. All fences shall be located entirely upon the property of the fence
owner unless the owner of the adjoining property agrees, in writing,
that said fence may be erected on the property line of the respective
properties. Such an agreement shall be submitted at the time of
building permit application. If the adjoining property owner does not
agree to the erection of such fence, the fence shall be set back a
minimum of two (2) feet from all lot lines. No fence other than a
decorative fence may be constructed along the side lot lines of a
residential lot between the street and the front extension of the
dwelling house. As used herein, the term "decorative fence" means a
wood vertical post and wood horizontal rail fence with no more than
three (3) rails or a wood picket type fence with at least two (2) inches
of open space between each picket.
B. No residential fence may exceed six (6) feet in height and no
decorative fence in the front yard may exceed thirty-six (36) inches in
height. Fencing in commercial/industrial zoning shall not exceed eight
(8) feet in height.
C. All fences shall be constructed and maintained in a substantial,
workmanlike manner and of material reasonably suited for the
purpose for which the fence is proposed to be used. Every fence shall
be constructed so that the side containing the framing supports and
cross pieces face the interior of the fence owner's lot. Any fence
which does not comply with the provisions of this Section or which
endangers the public safety, health or welfare shall be considered a
public nuisance.
Section 105-010: Snow-Stop Fencing. Snow-stop fencing may be used from
November 1 to April 1. No permit shall be required for temporary fencing.
Page 30 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
Residential Districts:
A. Agricultural products, equipment and appurtenances owned by the
owner of the property and used on the property on which they are
kept; and
B. All licensed and operational motor vehicles shall be parked on the
permitted driveway area. Any non-licensed, non-operational vehicles
must be stored in an enclosed structure; and
C. A maximum of two (2) of the following units may be stored outside of a
structure for more than forty-eight (48) hours on any residential parcel
provided they are stored on the permitted driveway area outside of the
road right-of-way or are in a side or rear yard. A licensed motorhome
or fifth wheel trailer is allowed in a side or rear yard.
1. Boat
2. Camper
3. Motor home
4. Snowmobile's
5. Personal watercraft
6. Personal Utility Trailer
7. Ice House
8. Small construction equipment
None of the above mentioned items may have an overall length from front
to back in excess of thirty-five feet (35').
D. Clothes lines, antennae, air conditioners, outdoor grills, play
equipment, ornaments and monuments; and
E. Temporary storage of materials and equipment during construction
and landscaping.
Commercialllndustrial Districts:
Storage of products, materials and equipment, excluding rubbish or junk, which is
necessary to an approved business operation in a Commercial or Industrial District, and
which is completely screened from adjoining properties and rights-of-way. The Site Plan
Review process is required to determine the appropriateness for storage permitted in this
Section, surfacing required for the storage area and the screening required. Outside
display of vehicles, equipment and merchandise for direct sale to consumers when such
outside display is customary and necessary to the trade and is a permitted use within the
zoning district. The Site Plan Review process is required to determine the appropriateness
of the storage or display proposed, surfacing required for the display area and any
additional landscaping or screening which may be required.
Page 39 of 62
l _
.
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord, #4 .
include, but not be limited to, softball, football, volleyball, broomball,
ice or field hockey, tennis, basketball tournaments, or outdoor music
concerts; and
B. Such activities shall be considered a Special Use within all
Residential Districts of the City and shall require a permit therefore.
The City shall have the right to make provisions in such permit for
insuring public health and sanitation, traffic regulation, noise and litter
control and regulation on the number of events that may be
conducted on a specific site.
Division 180: Planned Unit Develooments (PUDs)
Section 180-010: Objectives. To help encourage a more creative approach to the use of
land, departures from the Centerville Zoning Ordinance may be granted by the City Council
in the form of Planned Unit Development Districts to achieve:
Subd. 1:
Subd. 2:
Subd. 3:
Subd. 4:
Subd. 5:
A maximum choice of living environments by allowing a
variety of housing building types and permitting an
increased density per acre and a reduction in lot
dimensions, yard, building setbacks, and area
requirements; and
A more useful pattern of open space and recreation
areas and, if permitted as part of the project, more
convenience in the location of accessory commercial
uses and services; and
A development pattern which preserves and utilizes
natural features, trees and other vegetation, and
prevents the disruption of natural drainage patterns; and
A more efficient use of land and a resulting substantial
savings through shorter utilities and streets; and
A development pattern in harmony with land use
density; transportation facilities, and community facilities
objectives of the comprehensive plan.
Section 180-020: General Requirements. A special use permit shall be required of all
Planned Unit Developments. The City may approve the PUD only if it finds the
development satisfies all the following standards:
Subd. 1:
The development shall be planned so that it is
consistent with the Centerville Comprehensive Plan;
and
Page 45 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
Subd. 2: The PUD is an effective and unified treatment of the
development possibilities on the project site and the
development plan provides for the preservation of
unique natural amenities such as streams, stream
banks, wooded cover, rough terrain, and similar areas;
and
Subd. 3: The planned unit development proposal appears to
harmonize with both existing and proposed
development in the area surrounding the project site;
and
Subd. 4: The tract of land shall be under unified control at the
time of application and scheduled to be developed as
one unit. In addition, the development plan must
include provisions for the preservation of natural
amenities; and
Subd. 5: Each phase of the proposed development, as it is
proposed to be completed, is of sufficient size,
composition, and arrangement that its construction,
marketing, and operation are feasible as a complete
unit, and that provision and construction of dwelling
units and common open space are balanced and
coordinated; and
Subd. 6: The PUD will not create an excessive burden on parks,
schools, streets, and other public facilities and utilities
which serve or are proposed to serve the district; and
Subd.7: The proposed total development is designed in such a
manner as to form a desirable and unified environment
within its own boundaries; and
Subd. 8: The plans required under this Section must be
submitted in a form which will satisfy the requirements
of Ordinance #8 for the preliminary and final plans; and
Subd. 9: Permission to develop specific parcels of land under the
provisions which follow shall be binding on all
construction. Any change in the development plan after
approval by the City Council shall be resubmitted for
consideration; and
Subd. 10: Subdivision review under the Subdivision Ordinance
shall be carried out simultaneously with the review of a
Page 46 of 62
r
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
PUD under this section of the Zoning Ordinance.
Section 180-030: Uses Permitted. Permitted uses may include any combination of
dwelling units in single-family, two-family, town or row houses; any non-residential use to
the extent such non-residential use is designed and intended to serve the residents of the
planned unit development; public or private education facilities; or other uses permitted in
the Zoning District in which the planned unit development is located. When a PUD
proposes a mixture of residential uses with commercial uses, the Council may limit the
development of not more than ten percent (10%) of the tract to commercial uses.
Section 180-040: Relationship ot PUD Site to Adjacent Areas. The design of a PUD
shall take into account the relationship of the site to the surrounding areas. The perimeter
of the PUD shall be so designed as to minimize undesirable impact of the PUD on adjacent
properties, and conversely, to minimize undesirable impact of adjacent land use and
development characteristics on the PUD.
Section 180-050: Minimum Size. A PUD shall consist of at least ten (10) acres.
Section 180-060: Minimum Lot Size. The minimum lot size requirements of other
sections of this Ordinance do not apply to a PUD except that the minimum lot size
requirements of the underlying zone shall serve as a general guideline to determine the
maximum dwelling unit density of the total development.
Section 180-070: Setback and Side Yard Requirements. Notwithstanding other
provisions of this article, setback and side yard requirements of lots in a PUD shall be at
least equivalent to the spacing requirements of buildings similarly developed under the
terms of this ordinance on separate parcels.
Section 180-080: Access to Public Right-ot-Way. The site of a PUD shall abut, and the
major internal street or streets serving the PUD shall be connected to, at least one primary
arterial, or neighborhood collector street.
Section 180-090: Utility Requirements. Utilities, including telephone and electrical
systems, installed within a PUD shall be placed underground. Utility appurtenances, which
can be effectively screened, may be excepted from this requirement if the City finds that
such exception will be consistent with the objectives of this article and the character of the
proposed PUD.
Section 180-100: Open Space. A minimum of twenty percent (20%) of the gross land
area for private or public open air recreational use protected by covenants running with the
land or by conveyances or dedicated as the Planning and Zoning Commission may specify
shall be an integral part of the plan. Such Open Space areas shall not include land devoted
to streets, parking and private yards. Whenever possible, common Open Space shall be
linked to the Open Space areas of adjoining developments. Common Open Space shall be
of such size, shape, character, and locations as to be usable for its proposed purpose.
Page 47 of62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ocd. #4
Section 180-110: Parking. Off-street parking and loading space shall be provided in each
PUD in the same ratios for types of buildings and uses as required in the underlying Zoning
District.
Section 180-120: Arrangement of Commercial Uses. When a PUD includes
commercial uses, commercial buildings shall be planned as groups having common parking
areas and common ingress and egress points. Each commercial area shall be separated
from abutting residential areas by appropriate screens or fences. The design of
commercial areas shall provide for the integrated and harmonious design of buildings and
for adequate and properly arranged facilities for internal traffic, circulation, landscaping, and
such other features and facilities as may be necessary to make the areas attractive and
efficient from the standpoint of adjacent non-commercial areas. Any area which is not to be
immediately improved or developed shall be landscaped or otherwise maintained in a neat
and orderly manner as specified by the City.
Section 180-130: Arrangement of Industrial Uses. In any PUD including industrial uses,
the industrial uses shall be provided in park-like surroundings utilizing landscaping and
existing woodlands as buffers to screen lighting, parking areas, loading areas and outdoor
storage of raw materials or products. An industrial area in a PUD shall provide for the
harmonious design of buildings and a compact grouping in order to economize in the
provisions of required utility services. Streets in a planned industrial area shall be kept to a
minimum in order to reduce traffic. All spaces between the right-of-way line and the
industrial building line and all intervening spaces between buildings, drives, parking areas,
and improved areas shall be landscaped with trees and plantings and properly maintained.
Section 180-140: Procedure.
Pre-Application Meeting. Before submitting a formal application for a PUD under 55.03,
the developer shall meet with the Planning and Zoning Commission. The purpose of this
meeting is to discuss early and informally the purpose and effect of this Ordinance and the
criteria and standards contained in this Ordinance and to familiarize the developer with the
City's Comprehensive Plan, including the land use plan, the major thoroughfare plan, and
the parks and Open Space plan, and with the subdivision regulations and the drainage,
sewer, and water systems of the City.
Section 180-150: Application. An application for approval of a Preliminary Development
Plan for a proposed PUD shall be made to the Planning and Zoning Commission, by at
least one owner or lessee of property for which the PUD is proposed. The application shall
be accompanied by a certified check or money order to cover the costs incurred in
checking and processing such plans in an amount affixed by resolution of the City Council.
The application with accompanying Outline Development Plan shall be submitted in twelve
(12) copies and shall include:
A. A vicinity map at a scale of one (1) inch equals two hundred fifty (250)
feet showing property lines, existing streets, existing zoning, and such
other items as the Planning and Zoning Commission may require to
Page 48 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
show the relationship of the proposed PUD to the Comprehensive
Plan of the City, to existing schools and other community facilities and
services, and to the surrounding area; and
B. A preliminary plan of the PUD in schematic form showing the
following:
1. The existing topographic character of the land;
and
2. A composite of all natural amenities of the site
including steep slopes, drainage ways plus
marshes, ponds and lakes; and
3. The size of site and proposed uses of the land to
be developed together with an identification of
off-site land use; and
4. The density of land use to be allocated to the
several parts of the development; and
5. The approximate location of thoroughfares; and
6. The location of common open space including
public schools, parks and playgrounds or private
natural preserves; and
7. The off-street parking system.
C. A written statement including the following:
1. A statement ofthe ownership of all land invoived
in the PUD together with a summary of previous
work experience; and
2. An explanation of the general character of the
planned development; and
3. A statement describing the ultimate ownership
and maintenance of all parts of the development
including streets, structures and open spaces;
and
4. A statement describing how all necessary
governmental services will be provided to the
development; and
Page 49 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City of CenterviIIe Ord. #4
5. The total anticipated population to occupy the
PUD, with breakdowns indicating the number of
school age children, adults and families.
D. The proposed schedule for the development of the site.
E. A statement setting forth the reasons why, in the opinion of the applicant,
the PUD will be in the public interest and consistent with the objectives
specified for PUDs by Section 51.
Section 180-160: Actions.
Subd. 1
Subd 2.
By Commission. Within sixty (60) days of the filing of the
application, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold a
Public Hearing on the proposed PUD following written and
published notice as required for amendments of the ordinance.
Following such hearing and within sixty (60) days of the filing
of the application or at a later time agreed to by the applicant,
the Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend
approval or disapproval of the preliminary proposal with such
changes and conditions as it may suggest and shall transmit its
recommendations to the City Council. In its recommendations
the Commission shall determine whether the proposed PUD is
consistent with the objectives for PUDs specified in Section 51
and with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan of the City; and
whether the benefits, combination of various land uses, if
proposed, and the inter-relationship with the land uses in the
surrounding area justify the deviation from standard district
regulations allowed by this ordinance for PUDs.
By Council. Upon receipt of the recommendations of the
Planning and Zoning Commission, the Council shall consider
the application and, after holding such public hearing as it
deems desirable, shall approve or disapprove the application
with such changes or conditions, it any, as it may deem
appropriate. Refusal of any changes or conditions shall
constitute denial of the plans by the City Council. Failure of the
land owner to notify the City Council of his acceptance or
refusal of the modification to the plan constitute acceptance of
these conditions. No Building Permits may be issued on land
within the PUD until final plans for the development have been
approved by the City Council under the procedures provided in
the following sections.
Section 180-170: PUD Agreement. The Zoning Administrator shall instruct the City
Attorney to draw up a PUD Agreement which stipulates the specific terms and conditions
Page 50 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
approved by the City Council and accepted by the applicant. This agreement shall be
signed by the Mayor of the City of Centerville, Clerk/Administrator and the applicant within
thirty (30) days of the City Council approval of the PUD application and final plat. Where
the PUD application and/or final plat is to be resubmitted or denied approval, the City
Council action shall be by written report setting forth the reasons for its actions.
Section 180-180: Final Review and Approval. An application for review and approval of
the final development plan shall be filed by the applicant with the Planning and Zoning
Commission within six months of the date on which approval of the preliminary plan was
given by the Council. If application for final approval is not made within the time required,
the proposal shall be considered abandoned unless an extension period is requested and
granted by the City Council.
Section 180-190: Documentation Required. The final application shall be
accompanied by the following supporting documentation:
A. A final plan of the PUD in schematic form including the following:
1. The street system, lot layout and off street
parking and loading plan; and
2. The use, height, bulk and approximate location
of buildings and other structures; and
2. Land areas to be conveyed, dedicated or
reserved for parks, parkways, playgrounds,
school sites, public buildings, and similar public
and semi-public uses; and
4. A site plan for each building site and common
open area, showing approximate location of
buildings, structures and improvements; and
5. Generalized elevations and perspectives of all
structures; and
6. A site grading plan indicating the direction of flow
of surface drainage and all easements necessary
for both ponding and runoff; and
7. Plans, profiles, and specifications for the
distribution of water, collection of sanitary waste
and storm water; and
8. A landscape plan indicating the location, size
and type of plant materials to be used; and
Page 51 of62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
9. Plans, profiles, typical sections and
specifications for proposed street improvements;
and
10. The density of land use to be allocated to the
several parts of the site being developed.
B. A written statement including:
1. The approximate date when construction will
begin by stage of development and the area of
open space to be provided at each stage; and
2. Agreements, provisions or covenants which
govern the use, maintenance and continued
protection of the development and any of its
common open areas; and
3. Other conditions speCifically required by the
Commission and the Council for the particular
PUD.
Section 180-200: Action On Final Application. Procedure for action by the Planning
and Zoning Commission and the Council on an application for review and approval of the
final plan for a PUD shall be the same as prescribed by this article for the action on the
preliminary proposal. In giving approval, the Council may specify the length of time within
which construction of the project must be begun or be completed, and it may attach such
other conditions as seem necessary. The final development plan shall be in general
conformance with the preliminary development plan as approved.
A. Criteria for Approval. The findings necessary for approval of both
the preliminary and final development plans shall be based on the
following and describe in what respect the plan would or would not be
in the public interest.
1. The plan does not conflict with the Centerville
Comprehensive Plan.
2. The plan is designed to form a desirable and
unified development within its own boundaries.
3. The proposed uses will not be detrimental to
present and future land use in the surrounding
area.
4. Any exceptions to the standard requirements of
the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances are
Page 52 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
justified by the design of the development.
5. The plan will not create an excessive burden on
parks, schools, streets, and other public facilities
and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve
the PUD.
B. Non-Compliance. In the event the plan as submitted for final
approval is not in substantial compliance with the preliminary
development plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall notify
the applicant within forty-five (45) days of the date of application,
setting forth the ways in which the plan is not in substantial
compliance.
1. The applicant may treat such notification as
denial of preliminary approval; or
2. The applicant may re-file his plan so that it does
substantially comply with the outline
development plan; or
3. The applicant may file a written request with the
Planning and Zoning Commission that it hold a
public hearing on his request for final approval.
Any such hearing shall be held within thirty (30)
days after the request for such hearing. Within
forty-five (45) days of such hearing the Planning
and Zoning Commission shall either grant or
deny preliminary approval to the plan.
C. Final Approval. The City Council shall review and approve the Final
Development Plan if it is in substantial compliance with Preliminary
Development Plan. Following this, the applicant shall record the Final
Development Plan in the manner provided for recording subdivision
plats. If the Final Development Plan is not in substantial compliance,
the applicant shall be requested to repeat the procedures outlined for
the Preliminary Development Plan.
Section 180-210: Time Limit. If work on the PUD is not started within three months ofthe
proposed SChedule date after final approval has been granted, approval shall terminate
unless an extension period is requested or granted by the City Council.
Section 180-220: Annual Review. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review all
PUD Districts within the City at least once each year and shall make a report to the City
Council on the status of the development in each of the PUD Districts. If the City Council
finds that development has not occurred within a reasonable time after the original
Page 53 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
approval, the City Council may instruct the Planning and Zoning Commission to initiate
rezoning to the original Zoning District by removing the PUD Districtfrom the Official Zoning
Map.
Section 180-230: Amendments. Amendments may be made in the approved final plan
when they are shown to be required by changes in conditions that have occurred since the
final plan was approved or by changes in the Development Policy of the City.
A. Minor changes in the location, sitting, and height of buildings and
structures may be authorized by the City Engineer if requested by
engineering or other unforeseen circumstances.
B. All other changes in use, rearrangement of lots, blocks, and open
space, must be authorized by the City Council under procedures
outlined for amendment of the Zoning Ordinance.
Section 180-240: Completion. Completion of the PUD shall be certified by the Planning
and Zoning Commission on the Final Development Plan. Thereafter, the use of land and
the construction, modification, or alteration of any buildings shall be governed by the
approved Final Development Plan. Changes may be authorized only under the procedures
provided below:
A. Minor extension, alterations or modifications of existing structures may
be authorized by the Planning and Zoning Commission if they are
consistent with the intent and purpose of the final plan and do not
increase the cube of any building or structure by more than ten (10)
percent; and
B. Changes in the use of common open space or the replacement of any
building substantially destroyed which exceeds the intent and
purposes of the Final Development Plan may be authorized only by
amendment to the final development.
Section 180-250: Site Improvements. At any time following the approval of a
Development Stage Plan by the City Council, the applicant may, pursuant to the
applicable codes of the City apply for, and the Zoning Administrator may issue,
grading permits for the area within the PUD for which Development Stage Plan
approval has been given.
Section 180-260: Construction. The construction and provisions of all the common open
spaces and public and recreational facilities which are shown on the Final Development
Plan must proceed at the same phase as the construction of dwelling units. At least once
every six (6) months following the approval of the Final Development Plan, the Zoning
Administrator shall review all of the Building Permits issued for the planned development
and examine the construction which has taken place on the site. If he/she shall find that
the rate of construction of dwelling units is greater then the rate at which common open
Page 54 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
spaces and public and recreational facilities have been constructed and provided, he shall
forward this information to the City Council, which may revoke the PUD Permit.
Section 180-270: Maintenance of Common Open Space. All land shown on the Final
Development Plan as common open space must be conveyed to homeowners association
or similar organization for the maintenance of the planned development. The common
open space must be conveyed to the homeowners association or similar organization
subject to covenants to be approved by the City Council which restrict the common open
space to the uses specified on the final development plan, and which provide for the
maintenance of the common open space in a manner which assures its continuing use for
its intended purpose.
Section 180-280: Homeowners Association. If a homeowners association is created,
the applicant shall submit plans at the time of final plan of development and documents
which explain:
A. Ownership and membership requirements; and
B. Articles of incorporation and bylaws; and
C. Time at which the developer turns the association over to the
homeowners; and
D. Approximate monthly or yearly association fee for homeowners; and
E. Specific listing of items owned in common including such items as
roads, recreation facilities, parking common open space ground, and
utilities.
Division 185: Variances
Standards
The Planning Commission shall recommend a Variance and the Council shall order the
issuance of such Variance only if it conforms to the following standards:
A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the
land, structure, or building involved and do not result from the actions
of the petitioner; and
B. Literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive
the petitioner of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the
same district under the terms of this Ordinance; and
C. Granting the Variance requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands,
structures, or buildings in the same district; and
Page 55 of 62
MEMO
DATE: December 1, 2000
TO : Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Jim March
RE : Mini-storage
I...........................................................................
We are expecting a presentation on a proposed mini-storage facility to be constructed in
the industrial park. Currently, mini-storage is not an approved use in the industrial park.
If the Planning and Zoning Commission wants to allow this use, then the Commission
needs to make a recommendation to Council to amend Ordinance #4.
l_ _
MEMO
DATE: December 1,2000
TO : Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Jim March
RE : Proposed Pheasant Marsh - PUD
,...........................................................................
Included in your packet is a revised preliminary plat for a subdivision to be known as
Pheasant Marsh. A public hearing on this revised plat is scheduled for this meeting. The
revised plat shows a reduction from 88 to 77 lots. The minimum lot size being proposed
exceeds 15,000 square feet.
The revised plat now contains a minimum 20% common open space as required by the
planned unit development section of ordinance #4. The commission needs to determine
if the written statements that the developer has provided warrants providing them
permission to plat the development as a planned unit development. The developer's
written statements are included in your packet.
New notices have been mailed out for this public hearing. The issues of traffic impacts,
school capacity and staging are sure to be discussed. A comprehensive plan amendment
would be required to allow a MUSA swap to occur. The City Engineer, Building Official
and Fire Chief will be asked for comments on this revised plat submittal.
L_____ __ __ _
r
~
ervi[[e
'Esta6[isfwi 1857
1880 Main Street . Centeroi[[e, M'J{ 55038
(651) 429-3232 . 'J(J;( (651) 429-8629
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City
of Centerville will consider a preliminary plat request submitted by Ground
Development. The meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, December 5, 2000 at 6:30 p.m. or
shortly thereafter. The purpose of the meeting is to hear all parties present regarding the
possibility of approving a revised preliminary plat for a Planned Unit Development
(PUD) for the area legally described as follows:
Parcel Identification Number R23-31-22-34-0001 and
Parcel Identification Number R23-31-22-43-0001
Southeast Quarter (SE v,) of the Southwest Quarter (SW V,), and the North Half
(N 12) of the Southwest Quarter (SW V,) of the Southeast Quarter (SE V,), all in
Section 23, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, except the South
528.64 feet of the North 578.64 feet of the West 445 feet of the Southeast Quarter
(SE '1..) of the Southwest Quarter (SW V,), Section 23, Township 31 North, Range
22 West, Anoka County, Minnesota, subject to County State Aid Highway #21
and any easements of records.
The City Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assisted devices or a sign
language interpreter must be received before 4:00 p.m. December 1, 2000. All persons
interested are invited to attend and to be heard, orally or in writing. You may call City
Hall (651) 429-3232 if you have any questions.
November 16, 2000
/s/ Teresa Bender, Clerk/Treasurer
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
Published in the Quad Community Press November 22 and November 28, 2000
1__
,...
HERITAGE
lut 1 ~
~_!
1::
;EL 36
lJ
~
5
.
.
.
.'
..
~
c--
~
-
./' 5
- \..24
--- "" 2f
,.,. ~
- -
,...
..
SlREET
I\~.IO
,. ~.. ~~1
}}!..',.-.,-....I~
s.iJ;!f~ = ..-:
;.....: ..
~i/' t03
9':
\\~tC:i./ I'
\ .J l}-
e .,:31.>:4"5
fir
ti
/"1""\:' ~'~~ ~~~,I":{.. " c-
,>:y, ,\ ,.~,,:,:~.,,. ~/'--
~r'('" ..7 ,.-' ~..
,.----~ ...1'2 1,3 101
~ ";.(4/ L"
~ -::- ~kiu-l~l'i .. \~~7 ~4/ ,\
:: ~1~ffi '\ r , 1 NY
/amD'. ""~l>\"'\ I~ Ill, I 1
. ..CJ:;-; _ '\.. ~'~~... ~ ,fA] EACU-: ","'t --',-
,.". ~ . . ::. ~
~ ,~1_\ ~i>~~~j ";
=< V4i ~~ '- 3
l!i '
:: ~,,' ,~~, 0""'"
. . iiY "'-. 1\'
'I l~ , ;' I'
~ \&4e __~ ," 4. 12~"""'\.""
a~3 ~I-Q;' \.~"
" " , ; .~ " >>.,(\'"
:~.5':> ,>i' '
'" Q lMI 13!lIJ
com;Il ./ . :.::,
lMO 18:58 lese 11174 I~ '~,b_f.,j
... :I O,-.'-~il
r
I
p,""
-
"
,,1,,1,.
'" Lsoe L .,
l' 17
111:25 1101'1 '841
171111724
':140 17...
11
""iT
,,,.
".'" I"'''' ..,
. ,d
'"
tl
3/~.R~"" 2
... 0 Y I",
~ .
21 7/t~ ~~O 3
t/311 '''"g
2
3
14
i.:.;-1NJ:-~':.E.._{
e.M~r:TT CA:-:;~)E:.IS
)I'
~
~
..I..
~
,,/
4'/
I
s
~
0 /
~ '"
. 0 /
0:
~
s:
~ //
z
....
<>
2
""'" J" v...
'". rm In, lne~ ~~l, ~ ~ 5
~~')f :j;:,
:q~~~~4.,l ~\:x1'r: )i'.:~J~~.;:
/'~~ ,. 15 18 t. " i1./ ./ 'P
'/ I
" 11
1 2' J .. 5 . ~"I 1 a I. sa 10 11
~ I"""" 17\:1. '711 \'1n 17'" 17~ I~~ 17 1
d CENlER
Z 1704 17Q!. ~ \17.3e1 1744 1~ 1780
::C 1 2 2. \
~ ~ to ". ~
~ rJ ~ & ,.~.~A\! it !:;-12 1J
<>~i5 ,./;:v
I;):~~.~
-
1771 ...... 1
STREET
1718 l~,l__ :::I~
r! ig 1':J.:5
1.\....,S/ 17 oto/. At
t!::!.
,. ::! ....
0:; 2A
" Ii ~
. '"
~ ______ if ...'A
-=t l'I:
i
~
/'
i
"
.
!
~,:~L"tervi[[e
. .A1/ii. 'Estab(isfiec{ 1857
1880 :Main Street · CenterviIfe, :M9{ 55038
(612) 429-3232 . 'F~(612} 429-8629
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT
DATE PAID //-/6-M
FEE $4::2', t'O ~
~c-",,/D'" #$7?-,/
STREET LOCATION OF ,PROPERTY (;~,,\_~ '((.,.""\ '>
6~ t)..,~~,,~ I t""-~ ~'\- ~.- 'fu.~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
-s - - . ..Gtl...\...~
~~o'*~
SIZE OF PARCEL (S)
'5""\ , -n ~" \r~
(43
C. r...\J.X\ ~ t\......;~""V~ )TJ-:lC PHONE # '54'-.... 2..' <-">
PROPERTY OWNER
FEE OWNER: C~<,,,,\,..r-~ \,\,,~~ ,"':\:1...ie.,
ADDRESS: 'Po"1"> r ",,,,,,",,c..r~-.._'\ R\,.)~ ".'L u:} l ~",,~..............: t\.;:> S'S 3b'i
APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY
FEE OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER 'y.
LEASEHOLDER OPTION TO PURCHASE,
"
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST ~) 14W' ......~ (b}",~
REASON FOR REQUEST
'0 .. ....-.....~\.:.:\ '~:::-~~ ~_..: \:>
Sig$Of~ii~-
'"'____ \.A- ~H~~""P~
Signature of property owner
* Plus any additional costs
incurred for engineering,
legal fees, publication or
other requirements.
Date
MrMrs FirstName LastName Addressl City State PostalCode
Mr. Walter Pracher or 6756 Centerville MN 55038
Current Centerville
Owner Road
Mr. & Mrs. Robert Koran or 6759 Centerville MN 55038
Current Centerville
Owner Road
Current Owner 6805 Centerville MN 55038
Centerville
Road
Mr. Thomas Wilharber or 6849 Centerville MN 55038
Current Centerville
Owner Road
Mr. Dennis Zerwas or 6882 Centerville MN 55038
Current Centerville
Owner Road
Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Vanderbeek 6892 Centerville MN 55038
or Current Centerville
Owner Road
Mr. Charles Baumann or 6903 Centerville MN 55038
Current Centerville
Owner Road
Mr. & Mrs. John Lundblad or 6904 Centerville MN 55038
Current Centerville
Owner Road
Mr. Werner Schoeberlein 6906 Centerville MN 55038
or Current Centerville
Owner Road
Mr. & Mrs. Larry W oiak or 6925 Centerville MN 55038
Current Centerville
Owner Road
Mr. & Mrs. Dale Greenwaldt 4697 - Stacy MN 55038
or Current 316th
Owner Lane
Mr. & Mrs. Michael Predmore or 1704 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Gary Will or 1705 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Philip Schweiger or 1708 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Steven Sather or 1713 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
1-
MrMrs FirstName LastName Address! City State PostalCode
Mr. Robert Olson or 172] Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Randall Peterson or ]729 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. Steven Hulbach or ]736 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Jeffrey Daas or 1737 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Jeffery Haider or 1744 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. William Campbell or ]745 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Mark Gerszewski ]752 Centerville MN 55038
or Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Mark Plombon or 1753 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Robert Intihar or 1760 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. Daniel Kupfer or 1761 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. John Marten or 1768 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Steven Dixon or 1769 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Ms. Corrine Zerwas or 1776 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Gene Lewis or 1777 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. Scott & Ms. Lynn 1785 Centerville MN 55038
Munson Wright or Center
Current Street
. MrMrs FirstName LastName Addressl City State PostalCode
Owner
Mr. & Mrs. Orville Hughes or 1793 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Karl Solberg or 1800 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Ms. Jane & Mr. Dennis 1801 Centerville MN 55038
Hobscheid Olson or Center
Current Street
Owner
Mr. & Mrs. Dennis Countryman 1808 Centerville MN 55038
or Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Murray Wilke or 1809 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. David Dixon or 1817 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Ms. Cynthia & Ms. Ulshafer or 1825 Centerville MN 55038
Wendy Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. Sean P.A. Evans or Current 1832 Centerville MN 55038
Zwicki & Owner Center
Street
M. & J.L. Post or Current 1833 Centerville MN 55038
Schoonover Owner Center
Street
Ms. Saundra Gossman or 1840 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Keith Okan or 1841 Ccnterville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Clifford Lutz or 1850 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Steven Andert or 1858 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Ms. Leann Lindgren or 1859 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Dary Doten or 1866 Centerville MN 55038
MrMrs FirstName LastName Address! City State PostalCode
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Douglas Blum or 1874 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Brian Clancy or 1882 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Timothy Peloquin or 1889 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Walter Mehsikhomer 1890 Centerville MN 55038
or Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Theis or 1901 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Craig Curtis or 1902 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Mark Bader or 1909 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
M.T. Hunter & AJ. Hoffman 1917 Centerville MN 55038
or Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Larry Sailor or 1925 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. Daniel Arcand or 1933 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Ms. Jill & Mr. Mark 1934 Ccnterville MN 55038
Branson Olson or Center
Current Street
Owner
PJ. & R.R. Reid or 1941 Centerville MN 55038
Shaughnessy Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Blaine Hopp or 1949 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Brian Hanson or 1950 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
MrMrs FirstName LastName Address 1 City State PostalCode
Mr. & Mrs. David Grafsky or 1957 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Wayne Rodriquez or 1960 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Hanson or 1965 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Robert Schaefer or 1970 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. Rick Carlson 7671 Fridley MN 55432
(Hunter's Central
Crossing Avenue
Development) N.E.
Mr. Rudy Garcia or 6932 Centerville MN 55038
Current Durpe
Owner Road
Mr. & Mrs. Kerry Knockel or 6942 Centerville MN 55038
Current Dupre
Owner Road
Ms. Julie Erickson or 6948 Centerville MN 55038
Current Dupre
Owner Road
Mr. & Mrs. Frederick Curran or 6907 Oak Centerville MN 55038
Current Circle
Owner
Mr. & Mrs. David Loren or 6908 Oak Centerville MN 55038
Current Circle
Owner
Mr. & Mrs. Jerry Fuhrmeister 6913 Oak Centerville MN 55038
or Current Circle
Owner
Mr. & Mrs. Gregory Needham or 6918 Oak Centerville MN 55038
Current Circle
Owner
Mr. William Michael or 6923 Oak Centerville MN 55038
Current Circle
Owner
Mr. & Mrs. Scott Sears or 6926 Oak Centerville MN 55038
Current Circle
Owner
Mr. & Mrs. Patrick Dahl or 6926 Oak Centerville MN 55038
Current Circle
MrMrs FirstName LastName Addressl City State PostalCode
Owner
Mr. & Mrs. James Halbert or 6907 Centerville MN 55038
Current Pheasant
Owner Lane
Mr. & Mrs. Barry Reiland or 6908 Centerville MN 55038
Current Pheasant
Owner Lane
D.P. & M.B. Branson 6913 Centerville MN 55038
Dagostino or Current Pheasant
Owner Lane
Mr. & Mrs. Donald Labonne or 6918 Centerville MN 55038
Current Pheasant
Owner Lane
Mr. Rodney York or 6923 Centerville MN 55038
Current Pheasant
Owner Lane
Mr. & Mrs. Kevin Navara or 6926 Centerville MN 55038
Current Pheasant
Owner Lane
T.E. & J. Tarnowski 6933 Centerville MN 55038
Peterson or Current Pheasant
Owner Lane
R.I. Stephan & K.E. Gardner 6907 Centerville MN 55038
or Current Sumac
Owner Court
R.W. Dailey & P.E. Arnold 6908 Centerville MN 55038
or Current Sumac
Owner Court
Mr. & Mrs. Michael Carter or 6913 Centerville MN 55038
Current Sumac
Owner Court
Mr. & Mrs. Daniel Martinez or 6918 Centerville MN 55038
Current Sumac
Owner Court
Mr. & Mrs. David Billingsley or 6923 Centerville MN 55038
Current Sumac
Owner Court
Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Steele or 6926 Centerville MN 55038
Current Sumac
Owner Court
Mr. & Mrs. Paul Wolf or 6933 Centerville MN 55038
Current Sumac
Owner Court
Mr. & Mrs. Michael Dunne or 6907 Centerville MN 55038
Current Tourville
L_ _. _
MrMrs FirstName LastName Addressl City State PostalCode
Owner Circle
Mr. & Mrs. Lawrence Klecker or 6908 Centerville MN 55038
Current Tourville
Owner Circle
Ms. Dawn Sperry or 6913 Centerville MN 55038
Current Tourville
Owner Circle
Mr. & Mrs. Kent Davidson or 6918 Centerville MN 55038
Current Tourville
Owner Circle
Mr. & Mrs. Vincent Craigmile or 6923 Centerville MN 55038
Current Tourville
Owner Circle
Mr. Jeff & Ms. Barbara 6926 Centerville MN 55038
Weber Awker or Tourville
Current Circle
Owner
Mr. John Mersinger or 6936 Centerville MN 55038
Current Tourville
Owner Circle
Mr. Gordon Rehbein or P.O. Box Hugo MN 55038
Current 324
Owner
L&G 6805 - 20th P.O. Box Hugo MN 55038
Rehbein, A venue South 324
Inc,
Mr. Walter David & 6756 Centerville MN 55038
Pracherl Linda Vickers Centerville
Road
Anoka Property Taxation 2100 Anoka MN 55303
County Records & Third
A venue
11/29/00 lIED 17: 42 P.ll 612 346 7~21 GROllND DEVELOPMENT INC.
ldIoo2loo~
GROUND DEVELOPMENT, INC,
7G76 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAn
SUITE 1I60
GOLDEN VALLEY. MINNESOTA GG4i7
7~~-8+H6lI6
faC'8itnile163-646-nil
November 29, 2000
Mayor Wili'larber and City Council Members
Advisory Planning Comm/$slon Member$
c/o
Mr. Jim March, City Administrator
City of Centervill.
18BO Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038
Dear Mr, March:
The City 01 Oentervllle's zoning code requires a wrlllen response prepared by the applicant for
live issues when lIeeking approval of It. "lllnned Unit Development (PUDl.
TI'Ie follOWing is Ground Development, Inc.'s response to tllese luues:
1. A utatement of the ownership of alllllnd Involved i n the PUD together with
a summary of previoue work expsr'-nce; llnd
The current land owner I' Country Ridge, Inc, In 1 997 Gor-EM L.LG. proposed a
rezoning to an Fl-2a district and a preliminary plat for the Eagle Pasa Tl'lirtl Addition oorlsistlng
of 100 singl. lamlly lots. However, this propoul wa. withdrawn by the applicant. The
developer 01 Pheasant Marsh and the acqulrlng new owner of lit. property will be Ground
Dev.lopment, Inc. Ground Development hilS been In business since 1977. GDI ha$ platted over
1,000 single family lots in 12 communities throughout the Twin Oily metropolitan area.
2. An explanation of the liIen.ra' character of the planned development; and
Pheasant Marsh Is asingle family PUD proposal consistingQf TT lots al54-. 73 acres
with a gross density of 1.4 unlt&lacre. The largesllot is 31,416 SF. the smallest lot is 15,010
SF and the average Is 16,282.
The three llllOelIS poinls serving the site were a major design constraint as well GIS
avoiding the wetlands wherever pOSSible and another W!lS tc be as sensitive to the existing
rllsldences to the north in the Center Oaks Addition.
Three phll$as are being PrQposed. 'The first oontainlng 2 2 lots with tn. easterly
extension of Dupree Aoad and the constnuction of Mallard Way. Phase 2. to the north will make
the connection IJl Pheasant Lane and inClude Partridge Place plus two Jots an Partridge Lane.
Tnl, addition has 27 lots. The third phase wlll llXlend Dupree to' where It currently deadends and
11/29/00 WED 17:43 FAl 612 646 T~21 GROUND DEVELOPMENT INC.
.
remainder 01 Partridge Lane containing 28 lots. (See attached plan).
Outlot A (5. 98llcres) and Outlots 8 end C(7. 1 a acres) equal 13.161lcres or 24% of the
site, exceeding the 20% open space requirement of the Cily.
The three phased Pheasant Marsh project will rsquire a~ land swap. The first
phase (22 lots) Is almost entirely within a MUSA area designated for 2005. Ground
Development propOlles to swap a portion of the 2001 MUSA land parcel in order to implement
the development plan being presented.
3. A statemant descrlbing1l'te Ultimate ownership and meintenlnce of a II
parts of the cMV1Ilopmem Including It.....S, structures and opsn epeela; and
The open spacll (Outlots A. B & C) will be conveyGd to tile City for ownership with the
excess area of the 20% to be conSidered for park dedication. All streets and utilities wUJ be
given to the City after the City's llnal InspectiOn/! have taken place.
4. A statement describing how all "eoesnry governmental services w III lie
provided to Ihe development: and
Every lot conforms to City zoning a;xie regulations and accesa Is being provided to the
exception at Ihe north end of Partridge Place. Ground Development, tnc. will provide one
mailbox per lot. however, they will be clustered as requested by the Postal Service. Fire and
Police protection will be provided by the City of Centerville and it's mutual aid providers.
6. The lotal anticipated Population 10 occuPV the PUD, with breakdowns
InCllcatlng Ihe number or echool age ohlldren. adult. and families.
The estimated total popUlation in the project I. projeGted to be 193. Two lIJ'lcl one-half
people per hou~hOld are anticipated in this development; two adulls and one-half child.
Centarvllle School OI81ricl Superintendant John Christianson uses thie method of projeGtin9
pctentlal students In the DI.triol: one-hall child In 81ngle family dwellings with a valuation of
$250,000 and above and 1.5 Children In nousehoJds where 1I1e valuation is $160,000 _
$250,000.
Our anticipated lot prices I n the first phase will be between $55 - 75,000 - mostly J n
the $65,000 range. The average homellot combined price is four to five times the COSI of the
lot Itself. As a reault, we flee the value of the homeJlot package above the $250,000 range.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to these issues. II you would like addi\lonal
information please contact me. Thank you.
Sincereiy.
~jJjJ'tt
~ Hanna
Ground Development, lno.
-
Ii!I003/00~
PHEASANT
MARSH
CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT EXHIBITS
FOR
DEVELOPMENT INC.
INDEX
SHEET I
SHEET 2
SHEET 3
TITLE SHEET
PRELIMINARY PLAT
EXISTING CONDITIONS
GROUND
7575
GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD, SUITE
PHONE: (763) 546-2625
250, GOLDEN VALLEY,
FAX: (763) 546-7321
MN 55427
'IT
2
I
I
I
I
I
" I
~
2
11
-I
II
f'C-"ITr:.-L:l
,---,L" ILI\
8Ai<S ~
,---------,
I r:.-""r:.-:YT."" I I
I L_I,--.-l_. IIVI'
I
~E~~~TF~ C;;J<S
,"'.:.-"'''''''''..-;::)
'-'L_I'IL_'\
GAi<S ,..,
'-----'--=:c.-=--'--IJ
I
I
I
_-.J
OUTLOT A
"-
"
"
"
"
"
"
/'
'.///,
/'
\
5
"
"
"
I
\
\
\
" 3"
II II
" J
II II
"
"..11
4 J
"
"
I
1
I
I
I
I
-'
-,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,I ." I''=--L);:-'
rlUI'l1 L_I\--::
-rL:l^'1 ::.
I I \"IL~
,
I
,
Iii
il
I
,
,
I
,."
~-,
~~ I
!':!'<--:" I
,,' I
C) l,j ~~
iJ:: ,_ ~? I
() ;:LL
c~ ,,"I
(,') -~ ;~I
IJ:::"C 851
LiJ ui S~
,- ""I
~5 ,~-" "I II
--- :~--H :~:
I I I
I I I
I I I
II
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
___________-LJ_
I
OUTLOT C
N
PREPARED BY JAMES R HI1.L INC
RICK L OSBERG REG. NO. 22709
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER
HAROLD C. PETERSON REG NO 12294
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
SCALE IN FEET
100 200
'00
.
BENCHMARK
TNH ON CORNER OF DUPRE ROAD &: VOYAGER COURT 91J.50
TN!" ON CORNER OF PIONEER LANE &: EAGLE TRAIL 911,69
TNH ON CORNER or DUPRE ROAD &: PIONEER LANE 911.86
o
P"""lI
1 inth ~ 100 feel
I:", '" ",I
,UV\L.VI I
, n
5
I
I
__-L__
T
-----------------------------------------------------_________...L_________
.
(,)
C'"
-"'~
~ ~
_~ on...
- 0::: z~
_:::>:::IE.o
.- '" i"
~'iJ!l
tn CD ~
. E5 -::
C::~~~
1'5 .
z .;: $
1ft l.l.J ...r ~
...., .......... - I
Q) ",..!
E 0::: t:~
~~e
CQ z "~
~:5 ~:>:
.", c......a..
~
6 ...~;;~ I
;!:i~:
:i ~;U ~I
Ehh..j ."
- ~ ..j1l5 ~
{:~UU I
::~iil;~ I
j~hi~~ :0
_h.eo,s;;; _
~
. ~
l)z
2S '.
~ ~~
p::: Zz
~~ ti 5l~
~ rzJ c.. .
.:I: 3~
E-<~rn~~~
~~~ [zl-.
lZl~ l:l~
<~ .
r.:1 l:l>
::c ~~
Il. oz
p::w
oil
-
~
~
DRAWN BY
.55
DATE
11/29/00
REVISIONS
CAD FilE
20237TS-U
PROJECT NO.
20237
SHEET 1 OF .:5
ORAIM/I,CE AND unL/TY EASEMENTS
ARE SJ-IOMV THUS:
PROPF.RTY Or.sCRIPTION
PRnPnsrn SlIT DATA
MINIMUM SETBACKS
FRONT
SlOE (S'fREE1)
SIDE (HOUSE &: GARAGE)
REAR
l.4INIl.4UM LOT 'MOTH . SETBACk
l.4INIl.4UM ALLOWABLE LOT AREA
e
f"XISTING C:ON[)ITIONS
EXISTING ZONING R-5 (SINGlE FAMILY
ESTATES RESIDENTIAL)
ACREAGE 54.73 ACRES
PRoPOSED ZONING
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPl.4(NT
J5f"EET
20 FEET
10 FEET
25 FEET
BOFEET
15.oo05.F.
The Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) and the North
Helf (N 1/2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4),
a.1l in Section TW!:!nty-tbree (23). Township Thirty-one (31). Range Twenty-two (22).
Anaka County, Slate of Minnesota. except the South 528.64 feet of the North 578.64
feet of the West 445 feet of the Southea.st Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southwest
Quarter (SW 1/4), Section Twenty-thn~e (23). Township Thirty-one (31), Range
Twenty-two (22). Anoka County. State o( Minnesotl:l.
LOTS
R.o.w.
OUTLOT A
OUTLOT B
OUTLOT C
QV(RALL
J2.JJ ACRES
9.24 ACRES
5.98 ACRES
0.44 ACRES
6.74 ACRES
54.73 ~CRES
e
St.lALlEST lOT AREA
lARGEST LOT AREA
AVERAGE LOT AREA
OPEN SPACE AREA
15.010S.l'.
31.416S.r.
18.282 S.l'.
13.16 ACRES .. 24.cm
54.73 ACRES
BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH ON ADJOINING
SIDE LOT LINES. AND 10 f"EET IN WIDTH
ON ADJQjNING STREET LINES AND REAR LOT
LINES. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICA TED ON
THE PLAT
I
,
I
,
I '
I I
\ .l3 ~ JJ
-=-----'.-=:..:-=-=--1--=1-/ ,- 5
60{ 60.01 ~
I \-'1--
I ~5 "1
j.,o:'--
I ~U"lI;J~1
.. '-~I
.J 0 ,-c
\<' \...\...<--;::)~ ~ 1"'~1
rlVI"LI,"';: .(/)
i.cJ
,01
i(~1
(n I :i-CI
(/)
o 1 '<~'I~jl
C'~ I _...J
~~ I '\';1
I :,: :~'I
L') "'C : ~~
I i:>li,il
0::: ')')
',' I :',,:' I
~: I GO .ll
.Of
:) I .(
-,..-- ()
-~~'~
F''=.-I\ITr:.-D
",,1..._'''' LI\
8Ai<S
~c=~~-;--c=R GA\<S
('C.-II. ITr:.~i:) n ^ 1/('" "')
\.../1..._1' I I...~I \ Vr\r ,....;: "-
1---------
I
I
\
1315.76 589'29'02"E
I
I
I
I
>c; I
I:" ,
(:),';1
1,(<-
('J'(I
I-c -"
n~ 1
___-.J 60
~:;H:::R;" ::;;"RECSl
2
"-
"-
"-
"-
"-
"
"-
2
I
" 1 IriDI
" ^ .(
"- "I " 1",,)1
, '<J 2 I ()\.I::1
"
\
I
,. \ 5
JZ4.%
\
\
\
c.-\I ('r:.-::)TI r'\1\ 1
1..._1''-''1..._' IIVI'!
" I
,A
I R
..
"0
5
,.
-;-R~:~.S
Z6()64~ s.r.
OUTLOT ~..~92~2 s.r.
445.05 Na9"29'02~W
~
o
<
O~
lr~
N
w.
-':1:
-' .
5<
lr'
~ti
z~
w
U
~,I
~: \
'"
..
8
z
'"
'"
oj
N
'"
OUTLOT A
445.05 569"29'02.E
<-
.
494,80
I"J
1_'
Ib~
It;
I"J
"
I
I",
I~
I~
o
Ig
I ill
I~
"
I
I
1
I
___________J.
hJ J~
"
~
~
r 11 mo ,
.
<I \~12s.r. "
L iJl1JL 'lr ~ 15~J2 S.F.
r 1:3 ,!ll:fl"
. 12 ,-' , 3
~ 15209s.r. l~ 1'.
L, ""-"- ~ 17966H.
r 8:44
~ 13
~ l~t72 s.r.
L
1"
;;
i--
b
o
In
'"
..
'"
'"
'"
N
OUTLOT C
:1:
<
en
d.
~,
2~~~7 S.,
o
<
o
lr
W
-'
-'
5
lr
~
Z
W
U
'"
N
o
P"""I
SCALEINfIET
100 200
-
llr1dl.. l00'"t
"......,"... .
UU'LUI "
_____-1-____
1"
o
..
"'
..
o
~
;;;
..;
'"
'"
----~-----~----------
-____________.l..__________
"'''q;,
1315.63 N89"26'55"W
.
(.)
C '"
- 12 ,
~
~
-'$! ~
- '" z *
- => 2 N
.- ~u
::J:
'"
. E5 ~ -
c::: w !<f~
z ' ~
<:3 .
z JI :
en w ..,g
Q) "- *<1
'" ~m
E '" ~N'
w u""
Z
ca Z 310 ..
... ~llJ
"" ..., ~
Cl. Nil'
~
~ ,.~ol I \
'll.. ~~ ij~ I
:!1lll~!; ,
:i~<>C.!l I ,
H~:~Ei 1
:s~ed~5 I
~,E ,.".J1 c.li
..~;ii;~ I ~
l~ hiM
_ll-ll.o;;".5iii
~
.
tJ;
z'
<=l ,.
ffi ~ ~~
~g ~ $]~
~~)-l ~.
z go
E-<"~Er::l:
~i~ f.i~
~~j o~
r.:l r::l 0'
~ g: ~~
oz
~H
.
~
DRAWN BY
OLM
DAlE
11/29/00
REVISIONS
BOOK/pAGE
NONE
CAD FILE:
20237pp.dw9
PROJECT NO.
202:!.7
FILE NO.
1-QQ-233
SHEET 2 OF .3
~
I
I II
I i
~I
ll!l!
II1I
,Ill
11
II
II
L " I ~ ITC-L:l'-:
rlul~ I L_I\~
TD^I' ::-::
II\"I~
I
-.-J
~,~ II il~r
(,') lii?1
2~ ~J I ~l:!\ll
(/) -'--- 1,";.111'
iJ::: ,,( 5 :'If:
~'~ (/) ,g:1
""-- ,':..), (): I
:) ,
--~~I!f\I"
I "l
" I
,Ij
I' :
II!
II!
I' \
I' Ii.
I:' 1
------1l '
4'"
/' r- ~ I-'-r~ LJ
,-,C_I'lILrl\
F\ ^ 1/:::;
vrq\~
"
5
I
t;
~(
(f)
"1'
t~ I
._u_/
Jj
'"
2
I' r- ~ I,r-;:)
,-,c_, 'l I L_I \
"'A 1,'::'--
vrd,...)
>..
r-\I"\r:.-:::)"'T'"lI'~ I
L_I,,-,L_' IIV,"
'"'~"'
.~
I
I
I
\
1
I
I
I
I
~
I
" I
0'-..... I
- "" 2
"
.(
.~~
. ~'--"--
. ."u~.~
.,~
QCI5T1NGORA<Il.cE
.
o
'-.00
D
D
$
*0
,~
-------------
o
f'o::.-II.,-rC-D
'-'l_I'lIL_I\
O,;~<:3 2
2
, ;;;>
~.'.."..'.,?\..'.. ............'-.'.../.. ".'
'. 'tij~, ,
. t-
~ - - -- .
~ ~ ~ ~
, , \.
M . . ,
.- \
,,"",
'~
LIl1II!I!
EXISTING ELECTRIC 80X
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE
EXISTING WETLAND
EXISTING GRAVEL SURFACE
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE
EXISTING FENCE
EXISTING TREE UNE/TREES
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING WATERMAIN
EXISTING SANITARY SE'N(R
-------------
BENCHMARK
TNH ON CORNER Of DUPRE ROAD &: VOYAGER COURT
TNH ON CORNER OF" PIONEER LANE &; EAGlE TRAIL
TNH ON CORNER Of DUPRE ROAD &: PIONEER LANE
913_50
911.69
911.66
o
P"""lI
SCALEINfEH
100 200
linch_100feet
I
I
II
I :
I !
I i~'T' ~J
,VU',',V' I
1_; "
L
\
N
J_____,
""
,
.
(.)
ClQ
- O~
>- 'l
-~ ~
-"'~
:=~J2!
:r=.......~
V"> >ll
'" -
. I:tI 0 ~
CM:z~""
c:3~
,,. 15 '" ~
VI '~5l
CDtn&.l'5!..
E "'""
""' ~ ~
:z: .-
a:s z ;II: ..
_5iii~
., ~ "" D..
~
. !.
8 ",_;;f;
'IE;;~'1i
i ~l':1I
~~".~.!!
E!~ ~H
~~ ~it ~ ~
h~HH
eU~H~
~i~i:.s~
II
I.
Il
Ii
,
,
~
t,).
z',
::c ~ -~
~ sa ~~
<gt:: S]~
:::;! ~ Cl c.."
~5 sg
~~t.>~fzl~
<5e,; >lI>
~~i5 [gl
""l f-' Cl >
~ ~ ~~
c.. fzl 05
~g
~
DRAWN BY
055
DATE
11/29/00
REVISIONS
CAD FILE
202J7EX
PROJECT NO.
20237
SHEET .'3 OF .'3
MEMO
DATE: December 1,2000
TO : Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Jim March
RE Rezone Request - 1873 Main Street
I...........................................................................
A public hearing has been scheduled to solicit input for the proposed rezoning ofthe
parcel with the street address of 1873 Main Street. A hearing was previously held on this
item several months back to gather public input on the concept. At that time, one resident
was in attendance to comment on the proposal.
The item was never officially taken before the Council for fonnal approval. Mr. Drilling
went ahead and purchased 1873 Main Street and has now removed the former house on
the property.
The property was formerly zoned R-2 residential and is now being proposed as B-1
commercial. The property is directly to the east of and adjacent to a currently zoned
vacant commercial parcel. It makes sense to rezone this property to commercial to better
utilize the property. Access to the property will probably be the largest concern of the
residents.
The property exceeds all of the minimum size requirements for a commercial parcel. The
owner is proposing to build an office/retail center on the site. A site plan will be
approved at a future date.
~
tervi{{e
'Esta6asfid 1857
1880 'Main Street _ Centervi!fe, 'M'J{ 55038
(651) 429-3232 -:Fa:( (651) 429-8629
.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR RE-ZONING PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission will
hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council on the following
matter:
ITEM:
PETITIONER:
LOCATION:
LEGAL:
DESCRIPTION:
Rezone from R2 (Single Family Residential) to CI (Commercial)
Lloyd Drilling
1873 Main Street
R23-31-22-12-0002
THE S 419 FT OF THE W 208 FT OF THE E 24 RODS
OF THE NW Y. OF NE Y. OF SEC 23-31-22 ANOKA
CNTY, MN (EX THE E 30 FT) (EX THE W 30 FT) & (EX THE
N 219 FT THEREOF) (EX PART TAKEN FORHWY BY
ANOKA CNTY 8/23/73)
The petitioner requests the Commission to rezone to allow the construction of a 10,000
square foot retail center housing six (6) retail spaces.
The said hearing will take place on Tuesday, December 5,2000 at the Centerville City
Hall located at 1880 Main Street in Council Chambers beginning at 6:30 p.m., or shortly
thereafter.
The City Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assisted devices or a sign
language interpreter must be received prior to 4:00 p.m. on December I, 2000. All
persons interested are invited to attend and to be heard, orally or in writing. You may
call City Hall at (651) 429-3232 if you have any questions.
November 16, 2000
Is/Teresa Bender, Clerk/Treasurer
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
Published in the Quad Community Press November 22 and November 28, 2000
.
1880 g.,{ain Street . Centem[(e, iJIf!AL 55038
'EstaElisfied 11J57 CITY OF CENTERVILLE (651) 429-3232 . 'Fa;t;.(651) 429-8629
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE OR REZONING
~ -I/< ..3fJ7Z ,f,u. ;"..J- -4:5?~
Any additional costs incurred for
VARIANCE: FEE: ~ + engineering, legal fees, publication or
other reqwrements
REZONING: K
STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY:
DATE PAID: 11/1P/t)7>
,/ f~3 /o/R J /i' 5'1-,
c':~/.-tt-r,-;r ~~.
- - (...1:/ -
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY:
/'1
A;~~~'1 --"iJ/-"i(2," ./:,..-{:. - #~.A-
J!.~ 2",;'}- .. ':.~ Z-j 2- --A 92 L/) -r I ~/ ill j ;7'_/
/~ .i/<_/>-
I-v/ ,
J
i ~ i ~i>:" ~~,., -.:5
Pd;,;;/
SIZE OF P ARCEL(S):
PHONE #:
c:; ~)/y'/J7--?3F{)
PROPERTY OWNER:
FEE OWNER:
ADDRESS:
5~uL
APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY:
~ FEE OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER
LEASE HOLDER OPTION TO PURCHASE
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: eZ , (1-7'1",J
J-"'" CL77?Ym,?,n(,,_
,/ - -.
REASON FOR REQUEST:
J
AI
/' /
L~eqtV-.../Li
/.~ tJ{'r!J -:hI/': 10 M7A.,fl /yu-c~
tI ,)
I have read the attached Ordinance #4, Page 13 "Variance", Pages 55-62, Division 185: Variances,
Section 185-010: Board of Appeals and Adjustments, Section 185-020: Variance Procedures, and
Section 185-030: Variance Appeal Procedures. I was also presented with that Section of Ordinance #4
that I may/may not be in . compliance with and fully understand that if I am denied the ramifications of
same.
J
By paying the above stated fee, I understand that no refunds will be issued in full or i
even if the outcome is de -
Of~~
:Y C//oO
Date
".,
~
, '
""..( {
"..
-
.:. d~ ,
~N
#,,~V2
,~ ~
\
"
22
~
or
';ju .
"
~. - I
,,~ .
" I
F-' ~
I ~
"
r
,.
'"
27
SIDIEN LANE
177ll 17'84
i\1iJ 3
~~.:~~ ~
" ~
7
't-=:
''''t':l
K
f,
\
)::?:~
/
.( ..r
,e,. .
'''''~ I "
,....'"
. : I
~
.
y,
iN
-4 ).,
",-, ,,-
,- "-
;;:;kJ
;O:l<j
~~
i\l
,~
f,.:
V)
'\/
~., ~,.c of
~ -~
. i~''f'! '.~
. f ,I<
: lj,t:.' 1
,~ ~
-l
l'\.C.VV!rI:.;:r.'Kl:.t:.'
11128 18311 184+ 1852 11360 1858
" :I , ?,r . ...\_
3 (11""", I r~
2: l..- ._1 -' .I:l
--- St-\ ~J 01"
......... r"
~ ..j r--..
--
""""
7 if! ~If ..
(9., f; (I)
,^~V' ~ ~ 13
V- 5 g a.. :
_~ dr::: ~ K
~~
r , ''';T~
.1 j~. '
~
o
3
3 ..
'"
,
-
o
z
, ~
;~f.
+(tOr.
e"
r--_
,_ 3
7
----
s/~ 'a~~4 2
> ./' .-0
~/ , ~ ill ~ J
.~ ~/
2 J .. A S is 7 II _' ,\) /v ~ ~l~ '~ ~ ,;...... r .~:~. 19: ': ':
1. 13 l~~Jh 10 g l \ i~_.....,
.....w..... 1'" /'
t~ '~, 187'1 ~ 1909 J~.... J 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ,['0/
73RDS1REET 1 ~ - 3 ~< Ie '9 ~ '!l
!'''' ... W,W840 1846 JllG2 jllA m 1m 882 lSi1S .. i .. ... en ~ ~{};-'
I (' 1 2 ----= - 4 lAw 15 ----:::-i\.
1 A4J"14 5 1 2 3 .. 5 e 1 5 ~ S.3~j~"':}11~~ ~s
2 ... ---:.... ~;; 14 ," l.&.l
,1/.., 1,.',;" 1, · ~ ..:, :.' J , '7~~\~'; -;-~~i~ 1~ 11 ~ :
PRAlRIE DRIVE ~ is ~'~ a ':Nlr4 7 ~ 72ND 1/2 STREET 2:
"'" .., "" ';' \'';' ,~ "" "" ,... ~~;:t .' [Ji \ '''-.; ",...~ "., .., "'"
1~ 1 2 J; '1::.( ~ 12 1t 10 16>... Py ... f\ 8 Jtf;t.. /};" ~ 12 1
~ 7 E · a 1 f!I L
'<;\ ~:'L /13 --: ~ 13 ~J ----::- ~. "',.,-,,, , 7f 'Li. '. ,. z ~ ..
s ~ ----..::; lrkiRIOt .: ~ 2 CJ- 11 '-'1/\ ::t. ~ 14
_ 3-':' 15y.~O~ ---!:;t"'1. WPIORIAL. ~.. t3~, 1943 1oU<111 1S77 ~
~-., €1 \!t2 'Pi PARt( 3~ 72ND S1REE1' tiu
~~ -,~\~(~, 1iS 171 -1 1!IWr92l!l1034 IlWOl946 9lSO 1956 SlJ2[J lr~l^~~
. n ~ I~:'I 1O~ ' " '... 1 1:2 3, if? r e 7 'L' vlo' 11 12 '"
~ 17~ -Fe....... <4
,.... '-' f/832 1344 1350 ~ 1M2 1 :;;: 7 a 9 11'0 11 12,( ;7
0:.t 1.__I'-re2R~'itfi.JLw 1 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ t~;' PIIfj( ~9158
~~7 I..~r/~i-^I' f' Q,..~2 ~ ~2f--:- ~:51lk1:~9~~~:''''.z:
~ .1 2 ~ 5;0> ~ . ~ ~1O IS 1"-7 8", 10 IW
g a 21 26 Z5 241 23 \ 22 \ ~ ~ .. 3C~ L'2.1 " '" ~ i TV l<. - ~
~ !" HA::.",:~='",ll:":;'I'::;" t J ~ '< . ~~ ~,;t';' \ if '~::N~ ~:
~ 1 1 2 3 . 5" L'J .;'c a IS ~ 0 ~\ -. 2:; 'S:7 lSp -kl~. 1 ~.;~ ~I
3 ri, ....,: 1Q ~ ~!: 0\.;." 7 H .- n ~ 10 <'II
\:;11--.""""" 'a~~.7 7154 6~" 1 F:l-,]'o .t..;-'~J
~ ......... 10 15 _..... 1 : ,~, Ih 1 '
~ ~, 17 81:5 '/ i:iJ l1. <'< 8 --E. .....'O~ 1-... ~ 97D 1978 1.-
, --!r ~ "~ .....31 ~_ "20 ,_.~ S. ROBIN CANl'.'\
~ ~ ll\ ~, B I. ~ ~ 9 - ~ 95 7 8 ~ ~ :, _ PARte I'f& 1'T 1'r"PTTT'f't'
~ ~ o~ t:;:~ :L'1'" 'I' .4~ 'I '-!
!~3 AS ~ 13,: 11 ~ ~;: ~11l' ~
, . "~. ~ 1 ~ 11 -!e:::: 5 ~ 10 ~ Z ~ !:: z"-
-f! ., .~... ... HOULE CIRCtE .. 5~g <I( 17 .. :::......
::!. - >.>J 20 ~,,~ 1$4.4 18SO 12 .... 11 ~ lti !! t.J ;::. I .............
'" i;;.. " 0 ,. .. -<
J ~- 2t 22 23 24 ' 13 .... :5 12 ~ ... 01
1 2 ~_i., 7 ~ ~ '-',
1 ~~ 0.4 1 tiY':' 1 ~c' 8 ~ ~ /'J?: 05 !'I:'l)l~
co "':11 ON ~ I~,,:r:r.i~. . ". ". "r:FJ\' 12 1 14
1 .'Iv....' ...?.. 1;:::;W~~ _ ~ _ _ f"1863 ft ;: ~
lug 1~73
"
"
. ~
,.-
, ~ ~
J :a ~ 1830
O:J ,
1 0 '"
_~:d llJ 15
~"""11S37
>-
f-
.
,.
"
.
,
~ ,
~ 1
'--
,-
QUEBEC STREET
lP M2 1848 1<<18 18&.2 1810 874
STREET
2
.-
73RD
,~
.
"
~
(,J
~
~
~
-
.
;;
-
-~
.~~
I~
Pl~
.
1-
0 '''' '''' ,... . ~ :lOi...,: ''''' '000 ,... ,...
.: , 2 , :<S41 ~ . J ~
1,_<> .o"f.- '-' .;
,$'l~ h~ , ~ ~
,
If.:> iX ~
<}-1 - Q ! . ~
i! ,
.(... . 2
. ~\.1 ~
r\~
7 '\' ~
J
.
~
~ ~ I /31
I Ii'
" ~~
g , ,.7
~ !
"
;<
MrMs FirstName LastName Address! City State PostalCode
Ms. Susan Rehbein or 7067 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Current Drive
Owner
Mr. & Jerry Peterson or 7080 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Drive
Owner
Mr. & Desmond Englund or 708 I Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Drive
Owner
Mr. & Roger Edgett or 7087 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Drive
Owner
Mr. & Kevin Fogarty or 7088 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Drive
Owner
Mr.& Gary Wilson or 7094 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Drive
Owner
Mr.& John Herdina or 7095 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Drive
Owner
Mr. & Craig Ryan or 7098 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Drive
Owner
Mr. & Scott Tuominen or 7111 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Drive
Owner
Mr. & Durk Berrisford or 7112 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Drive
Owner
Mr. & Scott Bloom or 71 19 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Drive
Owner
Mr.& Ian Pickell or 7122 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Drive
Owner
Mr.& Dennis Kerschner 7125 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Drive
Mr. Ms. Lisa or Current 7130 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Douglas Domer Owner Drive
Miner &
Mr. & David Perkins or 7131 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Drive
Owner
Mr. Robert Wright Jr. or 7137 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Current Drive
Owner
Mr. Eugene Faul or 7138 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Current Drive
Owner
Mr. & William Bachmeier 7143 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. or Current Drive
Owner
Mr. John Kish or 7146 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Current Drive
l__ ___
MrMs FirstName LastName Addressl City State PostalCode
Owner
Mr. & Eric Hanson or 7149 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Drive
Owner
Mr. & Gregory Kieselhorst 7155 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. or Current Drive
Owner
Mr. Thomas Makelke or 7156 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Current Drive
Owner
Mr.& Paul Thell or 7163 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Drive
Owner
Mr. James Hesketh or 7117 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Current Way
Owner
Mr. Bruce Nelson or 7123 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Current Way
Owner
Mr. & Paul Racchini or 7126 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Way
Owner
D.L. J.L. Feickert or Current 7129 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mosher Owner Way
&
Shawn Akervik or 7135 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Current Way
Owner
Mr.& John Cashman or 7141 Brian Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Way
Owner
Mr. & John Korth 7028 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Eagle Trail
Mac or Current 7032 Centerville MN 55038
May Owner Eagle Trail
Homes)
Inc.
Mr.& Matthew Stierr Or 7040 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Eagle Trail
Owner
Mr.& Richard Terway or 7042 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Eagle Trail
Owner
Mr.& Steven Matson 7044 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Eagle Trail
Mr.& Douglas Porter or 7046 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Eagle Trail
Owner
Mr.& Alex Hamemick 7050 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. or Current Eagle Trail
Owner
Current Owner 1826 Centerville MN 55038
Houle
L___ _.
MrMs FirstName LastName Addressl City State PostalCode
Circle
Mr. Brian BeeTt or 1829 Centerville MN 55038
Current Houle
Owner Circle
Mr. & Michael Noble or 1832 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Houle
Owner Circle
Ms. Anne Johnson or 1835 Centerville MN 55038
Current Houle
Owner Circle
Mr. Joseph Juneski or 1841 Centerville MN 55038
Current Houle
Owner Circle
Mr. Keith Jensen or 1844 Centerville MN 55038
Current Houle
Owner Circle
RJ. D.S. Current 1850 Centerville MN 55038
Freese & Melander or Owner Houle
Circle
Current Owner 1825 Main Centerville MN 55038
Street
Mr. & Richard Robischon 1832 Main Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. or Current Street
Owner
Mr. & Dean Lauderbaugh 1844 Main Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. or Current Street
Owner
Current Owner 1845 Main Centerville MN 55038
Street
Current Owner 1849 Main Centerville MN 55038
Street
Current Owner 1851 Main Centerville MN 55038
Street
Current Owner 1853 Main Centerville MN 55038
Street
Current Owner 1855 Main Centerville MN 55038
Street
Current Owner 1857 Main Centerville MN 55038
Street
Mr. & Lren Clobes or 1858 Main CenterviJle MN 55038
Mrs. Current Street
Owner
Current Owner 1859 Main Centerville MN 55038
Street
Mr. & Tom Schlavin 1862 Main Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Street
City of Centerville 1880 Main Centerville MN 55038
Street
Current Owner 1863 Main Centerville MN 55038
Street
Mr. & Bruce Luikart or 7130 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Peterson
Owner Trail
Mr.& Mark Spehar or 7138 Centerville MN 55038
1_ __
MrMs FirstName LastName Addressl City State PostalCode
Mrs. Current Peterson
Owner Trail
Mr.& Steven Gurtin or 7142 COllterville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Peterson
Owner Trail
Mr. David Ugro or 7146 Centerville MN 55038
Current Peterson
Owner Trail
Mr.& Jeffrey Turner or 7151 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Peterson
Owner Trail
Mr. & Darryl Kohls or 7154 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Peterson
Owner Trail
Mr. Bradley Dixon OT 7159 CenterviIle MN 55038
Current Peterson
Owner Trail
Mr. Ms. Lenae Current 7162 Centerville MN 55038
Donovan Wagner or Owner Peterson
Poh] & Trail
Ms. Jennifer Doyle or 7164 Centerville MN 55038
Current Peterson
Owner Trail
Mr. & Jeffery Garrett or 7167 CenterviUe MN 55038
Mrs. Current Peterson
Owner Trail
Mr. Russell James or 7112 Shad CenterviUe MN 55038
Current Avenue
Owner
Mr.& John Peterson or 7122 Shad Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Avenue
Owner
Mr. & J ereme Engler or 7 ]27 Shad Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Avenue
Owner
Mr.& Eric Bowman or 7130 Shad Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Avenue
Owner
Current Owner 7133 Shad Centerville MN 55038
Avenue
Ms. Joyce Greene or 7135 Shad Centerville MN 55038
Current Avenue
Owner
Ms. Margaret Reber or 7]38 Shad Centerville MN 55038
Current Avenue
Owner
Mr. & James Bigelow or 7143 Shad Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Avenue
Owner
Mr. & Raymond Newbauer or 7146 Shad Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Avenue
Owner
Mr. & Jeffery Slede or 7151 Shad Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Avenue
Owner
I_~_- ~..
MrMs FirstN ame LastName Addressl City State PostalCode
Mr. & David Knoll or 7154 Shad Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Avenue
Owner
Mr.& James Merrill or 7159 Shad Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Avenue
Owner
Mr. Richard Grape or 7162 Shad Centerville MN 55038
Current Avenue
Owner
Mr.& Allen Wyker or 7167 Shad Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Avenue
Owner
Mr. & David Lutz or 7170 Shad CentervilJe MN 55038
Mrs. Current Avenue
Owner
1____
1: ,\fl
{ii' 1-
H
\Ti
I
t iIJ
r
:}
Z
.
I centerline of Peret"50n T :-ail
,-------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i I
U
[ I
f I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~-------------------
I Shod Avenue
,
I
,
I
,
I.
, )
I,;'
I'! "
"
,
,
I
,
I
I
I
',,-. -,---
iJJ
~
& i
I
50'-0"
I
,
I
,
r"""
t:;;:~
;1'.'-
~
:.:i
~
.-
Q
,
,
,
Q
,
o
(1\
~
"
F
({-:.~~
.. I
I
cr".!
~,..,,-."\'"
'"
~
()
G
,,'
,
,
o
80'-17/8"
/----..,
\\ . ~~,) ,
--
150.14'
200.02"
-----------1
/)
"
"0
~
u1
o
Q
,
o
~
r;'
a
,
"
"
:1l
lJl
o
Q
a
11
:!!
Cl
m
"
JG
m
-1
2':
,
Cl
m
Z
-1
m
JG
n
~
~
'0---1-
~()
,..~
~
"'--
'-..
1_- -- --! \
49.87 '_ \
I ~
I
,
I
,
Its
"""" """P
. "\---' .......-4
-~-I
"
"j
40'-0'
29'-117/8"
/)
.!.:
---
~
~
1l
I
~.
"
:::!
--------
.
\
~
Le:A$!!5PA:::E"I
W:A5l!!~A=E":<
1
FLOOR PLAN
3132" _ l' .O~
,<<
'\
L!.oI.!IoI!i ""iIee' ~
L!AOI!~AC.I!"l
"/]
ME-:::-l
~~
f'~~LE ':
FUl'RE ::
~6TRCCM_"--
I'".~,,=,,:
-::.~IEl~E
:: =..JThFCE
I, !'!E5TRCa1
""""-=--=-=--=""
_E.<l.elE_<lCE~
LE.....""!!~..oce....
LR...I\II_""el!'\'I
LI!:...q ~~.lCI'"
j
2
REFLECTED CEILING PLAN
3132" ~ 1" 0"
,
o
3
ROOF PLAN
l/32",.l'-O"
,
o
o
o
10 WACE5 .. 1~'_1Z>' 1i:AC-' . 2!!oe>'-O'
LEASE ~"'ACE ""
L;;:...se6P~:;:"6
.............
L3:A9&1"AC!":l>
L!_~~"
"'=
~
""""'"
'""'"' "
1i!E5TR.:::>cM-"--
1.'".:".---
"
.....,.
,
"
-",,,-,,",,-,,,-:J
LEAe:5"'.l.CE01
L::.<>sE"..o.c!!:'"
'~"
...............,...
LII49~~.,
L~46!!!Ilo"'~"&
J'muumm.,
o
o
,
o
--'rm.m
o
o
o
o
-:Eel-!.
""'"
-",'"^
!E5lRCCl"l
~,eo_e
~~
1'lE5TJ'!c;a->
L
l'...=~,.-:=
--::- POS51eLE
:: qm;~
" RES-IOOO"'!
"-'=-"-"-",,"
LE.4~~"'::::E'"!!
"
LI!A&I!_Ac2."
j
o
o
------t
",
LEA&: ec"'C: ":IZ>
LI!,l.6l!&lO'4e!!~
\.."
c
i
{
'd
}
,1 '
tAFc6(Jj)
'( " AI;;
}y'v
ifOl J (H
77~10
'-
OA=,CE/'RETA L C:::NTE~
C5!I1".gr'./ill5l, M;'1nS50:d
""""'_lI('Wfl.o;noa<r<CtR.lT""
LLOYD DRILllNG
.....,,,..."
REMEL Y ARCHITECTS
....M...~~nn>I
SNNI<:l(U'.....'""
la.1l'lOE:.lll=
F'1;mJ>>_
C(I"lIDII=P'8l9.T~lIlEC3IIEIfISOFJIfS
l>lCIII9OTHJf:f')OllI!OOU/JClEllW!il'lEclIECI_........"
.....l;IJENJ1ABlHSlDl""'OfiE!lUlE'"""~.
"">OIIlli~$.""'Ia:Mm::T"_
IlUEOOC_""If_""-'~""_'tIWI1.Ot.:slI
_"""NII~OCl'SI<lT"'"
,_""'""._I""".......~""'OO!U'(<l'_
....._!.IIEOIl_'lTtllQ:(~_....,''''.
1aI.'raz,;..""'''''''rg:'IIJOlRT'IE'.....'''''''".'''''''........
<MIL 01\l.t<t
FLOOR PLAN
.,.
. ..
.,.
""
A2
MEMO
DATE: December 1,2000
TO : Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Jim March
RE : Ordinance #4 Amendments
f...........................................................................
These will be presented at the meeting in final format. If the Commission wishes to
pursue the changes, a public hearing will be scheduled to amend the Ordinance.
MEMO
DATE: December 1,2000
TO : Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Jim March
RE : Sign Ordinance
............................................................................
I have nearly completed all of the suggested changes to the proposed sign ordinance. I
will be finishing the ordinance over the weekend and will have the ordinance delivered to
your homes on Monday evening.
~
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission held their re. ly
scheduled meeting on November 14, 2000, at 6:30 p. m.
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
PLANING AND ZONING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 14, 2000
PRESENT:
Commission Member Alan LaMotte
Commission Member David Kilian
Commission Member Rob Sheppard
Commission Member John McLean
Commission Member Ray De Vine
Commission Me.mber Brian Hanson
Commission Member Barry Brainard
ABSENT:
None.
COUNCIL:
STAFF:
I.
II.
'. e Commission and requested a larger sign
nee Mr. Schlavin stated that he is partially
. ting larger sign as a benefit of paying same.
e questioned e type of time and temperature sign Mr. Schlavin
to stall. Mr. Schlavin stated that he is requesting a larger sign to
mmission's decision as to what would be allowable.
sioner Brainerd questioned the current allowable sign size and consensus was
o (2) square foot sign was currently allowable.
ommissioner DeVine questioned the amount of street frontage Mr. Schlavin owned.
Mr. Schlavin stated approximately one hundred (100) feet.
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers questioned sign dimensions that had been discussed
at a previous work session. The Commission that a two (2) foot by three (3) foot sign is
allowable for a home based business. Ms. Vickers questioned whether Mr. Schlavin had
Page I of9
researched the possibility of rezoning his property to commercial and the effects of same
on his property taxes. Mr. Schlavin stated he had contacted Anoka County but was
unsuccessful in obtaining same.
Ms. Sanna Buckbee, 7381 Peltier Circle, stated that in her opinion Mr. Schlavin should
be allowed to erect a larger sign due to his property location.
Chairperson Hanson suggested that Mr. Schlavin research the possible advantages of
rezoning his property to commercial and the effects of same on his property taxes.
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers questioned resident response to the variance request
from Mr. Schlavin. Mr. March stated he had not received any negative input from
residents regarding this matter.
Commissioner McLean stated that the request did not meet the requirements for granting
a variance.
Motion bv Commissioner Brainard. seconded bv Commissioner DeVine to close the
public hearine. All in favor. Motiou carried unanimously.
Chairperson Hanson closed the public hearing at 6:47 p.m.
2. Ground Development (Preliminary Plat - PUD)
Chairperson Hanson opened the public hearing at 6:47 p.m.
Terry Hannah, Ground Development, was present and discussed the proposed eighty-
eight (88) lot development and the phasing (3) of same. Mr. Hannah also discussed the
elements of the development and outlined the modifications previously requested by
Planning and Zoning and Council. Mr. Hannah discussed the following modifications:
Traffic Impact (Centerville Road)
Mr. Joel Cooper, Engineer; Ground Development, stated that a formal traffic study had
yet to be conducted, it is generally understood that eighty-eight (88) lots would generate
eight hundred eighty-eight (888) trips per day on the roadway. Mr. Cooper anticipates
that 1/3 of the traffic leaving the development will flow outward to Centerville Road and
the other 2/3 will flow north to Center Street. Mr. Cooper reminded the Planning and
Zoning Commission that traffic generated by the new development would not come at
once but rather in phases as the development is scheduled to be built out within three (3)
to six (6) years. Mr. Cooper stated that in his opinion Centerville Road had been
designed to handle 7,000 to 8,000 trips per day and should be able to handle the added
volume oftraffic.
Drivewav Access (Two (2) Properties to the North)
This issue had yet to be effectively resolved and negotiations continue with the property
owners.
Trail Issue
Subsequent to the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, it was determined that the
City would request to have the trailway continued north through the Hunter's Crossing
development and travel along the sewer force main easement.
Drainage Ditch
Mr. Cooper addressed the drainage issue and stated that Ground Development would
install a storm sewer and ponding system that would drain into an existing wetland area.
As designed, there would be less runoff, post development, than at present. Mr. Cooper
felt that the impact due to modifying the drainage at the site would be null.
MUSA Line Swap
The City has stated that Ground Development would need to secure a MUSA Line Swap
and associated expenditures.
Dupre Road
Ground Development would provide for sidewalk installation along Dupre Road.
Park Land or Park Dedication Fee
The Parks and Recreation Committee requested park dedication fees rather than park
land. Previous discussion involved the possibility of dedicating a portion of the land
marked for open space on the plan for a park should future development occurs.
Monument Sign
The City has questioned whether a monument sign would be erected at the entrance to the
development. Mr. Hannah concurred.
Tree Conservation
Mr. Cooper submitted maps showing the treed areas and various tree lines. Mr. Cooper
stated that over half of the trees would remain, however, several would need to be
removed for construction purposes.
Commissioner Killian questioned the type of trees that would remain and be installed
within the development. Mr. Cooper stated that an official tree study had yet to be
conducted but to the best of his knowledge, the trees would be softwood not hardwood.
Impact on the School District
Lengthy discussion was had regarding Centerville Elementary's operating capacity,
student enrollment, occupancy of Phase I homes in 2002, the building of the new school,
the average price of homes comparative to the amount of children that reside in same and
the general impact on the school as a result of the proposed development.
Mr. Cooper stated that one of the PUD requirements consist of dedicating 20% of open
space within the development. Mr. Cooper addressed this issue and stated that 21.7%
open space has been allowed.
Commissioner Brainerd questioned whether the certificate of occupancy could be
contingent upon whether the new school is open for enrollment.
Mr. March indicated he had received various input from area businesses and residents
concerning the development. Some in favor of and some against. Mr. March stated that
three areas concerned him with the plans submitted. Mr. March also stated that
Centerville Road, as the developer indicated, is capable of handling 7,000 to 8,000 trips
per day. However, it currently is handling that many trips and the developer would need
to speak to Anoka County to receive a permit to access Centerville Road from the
development. Mr. March stated that the developer had indicated the reason he was
applying for a PUD was to have a variety of lot sizes, and that this is misleading due to
the current City Code that allows for various lot sizes with standard residential platting.
The open space requirement for POO's has not been met in this case, as the open space is
required to be useable land that is not private land. The developer has dedicated a
wetland and space in the backyards of the available lots as open space and that is not
currently allowed by City Code.
Mr. March submitted a letter from the developer addressing the issues requested by the
City. Mr. March also submitted a letter from the Superintendent of Schools stating the
school district is operating above capacity and will be doing so until the opening of the
new school in the fall of 2002. Mr. March indicated the current proposal submitted by
Ground Development does not meet the requirements for a POO.
Ms. Buckbee questioned how open spaces could be private but could not be in private
yards. Ms. Buckbee questioned whether the City of Lino Lakes had received a similar
letter from the Superintendent of Schools. Mr. March explained that the area dedicated
for open space within the development needed to be land not included in private lots
individual owned. Mr. March also informed Ms. Buckbee that it was his understanding
that the City of Lino Lakes had received a similar letter from the Superintendent of
Schools.
Commissioner McLean questioned whether the development was in linc with the City's
Comprehensive Plan. Mr. March concurred.
Ms. Lori Peterson, 7065 Dupre Road, expressed her concern that Dupre Road would be a
thoroughfare for traffic going out of the development to Center Street.
Mr. Cooper believed 2/3 of the traffic would flow north to Center Street.
Mr. Wes Schoeberlein, 6906 Centerville Road, expressed several concerns; current
capacity of Centerville Elementary, exit and entry to the development and the amount of
traffic currently and in the future on Centerville Road. Mr. Schoeberlein felt that Center
Street is currently unsafe due to the high volume of traffic and was concerned for
children's safety.
Commissioner Brainerd stated that the development of the property would be coming in
one form or another and suggested that a traffic study be completed to provide the best
and safest access to the development.
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers questioned whether Mr. Schoberlein had a driveway
easement and, if so, where it was located. Mr. Schoberlein stated that he drives straight
out to Centerville Road.
Mr. John Lundbald, 6904 Centerville Road, stated that he had a valid easement that was
part of the legal description for his property.
Mr. March indicated it may be easier to address the driveway access issue by eliminating
a couple of lots and centering the (2) two homes on the cul-de-sac at the north end of the
development to provide better access for the two (2) properties in question. Mr. March
stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission needed to determine whether the
development met the requirements of a PUD and either approve, deny, or table action.
Commissioner LaMotte questioned the sewer force main running to the north of the
development. Mr. March stated that the Met. Council owned the force main and was in
the process of replacing the piping in that area.
Mr. Joe Schwartz, 6882 Centerville Road, stated that he had concerns regarding the
proposed trail that would run along his property. Mr. Schwartz stated that moved to
Centerville to be outside of the inner city and was upset that the development was
coming.
Mr. Mike Carter, 6913 Sumac Court, stated that it could be possible for the development
to have houses in place prior to the opening of the new school, which concerned him.
Mr. Carter expressed a desire to have a park located within the development rather than
receiving park dedication fees. Mr. Carter felt that a park was necessary to prevent
children from crossing Main Street to go to the nearest park. Mr. Carter also expressed
concern for increased traffic on Center Street.
Ole Mersinger, 6936 Tourville Circle, expressed his concern for the safety of the children
along Center Street if traffic volume is increased.
Mr. Hannah, Ground Development, offered to amend the submitted plans to R-2 which
would increase the minimum lot size if the City could guarantee approval of the plans by
December 15, 2000. Mr. Hannah stated that if the City were unable to come to tenns by
December 15, 2000, Ground Development would not be developing the area. Mr. March
advised the Commission against making any commitments to an R-2 plan since there
would need to be a public hearing on the matter.
Mr. Schwartz stated that he had received information from the previous owner of his
property, which led him to believe, the area next to his lot would not be developed as it
was a nature area and that was reason he purchased the property. Commissioner Brainard
stated that it is the responsibility of property owner to research many areas prior to
purchasing property, such as school district, sewer and water, undeveloped land nearby,
etc. Commissioner Brainard stated that it is unreasonable to think the area would stay
undeveloped in a growing community.
Mr. Carter stated that in his opinion, Ground Development was pressuring the City to
agree to their terms by a specific date.
Motion by Commissioner Brainard. seconded bv Commissioner DeVine to close the
DubUc hearine:. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Chairperson Hanson closed the public hearing at 7:53 p.m.
III. APPEARANCES
I. Mr. Roger Shimon - ZoninglElectrical Fencing
Mr. Shimon, 1751 Peltier Lake Drive, was present and expressed his concern for
electrical fence running along the back of his property, eight (8) feet off the property line.
Mr. Shimon stated that there should be a larger buffer and requested that the Commission
modifies the ordinance accordingly.
Ms. Buckbee stated she was the owner of the electrical fence and that the fence was
previously fifty (50) feet off the property line as a courtesy to neighboring residents.
However, recently the fencing was moved to within eight (8) feet of the property line.
Mr. March stated that R-I zoning allows for electrical fencing and that the issue is
whether the ordinance needed to be amended to include a buffer zone between properties
where electric fencing is allowed and where other residentially zoned areas abut.
Chairperson Hanson stated that the current ordinance allows a property owner to place a
fence directly on the property line if so desire and that it is a courtesy that the property
owner has left an eight (8) foot buffer.
Commissioner McLean questioned whether there were similar properties that have
electrical fencing.
Ms. Buckbee stated that there were other properties within Centerville large enough to
have livestock but was unsure if others have electrical fencing.
Mr. March indicated the Commission would need to amend Ordinance #4 if they felt
there was a need to incorporate a requirement for a buffer zone between properties with
electrical fencing and those without.
Commissioner DeVine questioned whether Council Liaison Vickers' property had
electrical fencing. Council Liaison Vickers stated she did not but thought there was old
barbwire fencing located on your property. Commissioner DeVine stated he did not feel
the need to amend Ordinance #4.
2. Mr. Terry Sager - Mini-Storage
Mr. Terry Sager and his partner, Ed Sadeline were present and requested the
Commission's willingness in allowing a mini-storage facility in Centerville.
Commissioner Brainard questioned whether the facility would have an on-site attendant.
Mr. Sadeline stated it would not.
Mr. March stated that previously a proposal for mini-storage had been denied due to
limited space in the industrial park, the facility did not use city utilities, and did not create
jobs for the City.
Mr. Carter requested clarification on the location of the proposed mini-storage facility.
Mr. Sager stated that it would be located on the east side of the industrial park property.
Mr. Carter stated that he would prefer a mini-storage facility to an apartment complex or
some industrial use that would generate a lot of traffic.
Mr. March questioned the size and valuation of the building that was being proposed.
Mr. Sadeline stated that he did not have the exact dimensions at this time but would
forward them to the Commission in the near future.
Commissioner DeVine stated that the size and valuation of the building would weigh
heavily on his decision on whether or not to grant the request to build a mini-storage
facility.
Mr. Sadeline thanked the Planning and Zoning Commission for its time.
IV. OLD BUSINESS
None.
V. NEW BUSINESS
I. Schlavin Variance Request
Chairperson Hanson questioned whether Mr. Schlavin had a sign on the exterior of his
home/office. Mr. Schlavin stated that a sign is installed in his front yard, but not on the
home/office.
Commissioner DeVine stated that Mr. Schlavin's situation was unique; it did not fit the
requirements for granting a variance. Commissioner DeVine suggested that Mr. Schlavin
bring his tax statement to the next work session scheduled.
Mr. Schlavin stated that he is researching various avenues for his property, including
obtaining a variance for a larger sign and possibly moving out of the residence and
converting the building to a commercial use, allowing him to rent out part of the space.
Chairperson Hanson invited Mr. Schlavin to the work session on Tuesday, November 21,
2000, at 6:30 p.m.
2. Ground Development PUD
Commissioner McLean stated that Ground Development had done a good job of
addressing the concerns of the City and residents with the revised plan. Commissioner
McLean also stated that whether or not this development is approved, there would be a
development on that property at some point.
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers stated that the issue IS whether the plan of the
developer meets the requirements of a PUD.
Commissioner Brainard stated that since the plan of the developer did not meet the
requirements of the PUD, the Commission had no choice but to deny their request.
Commissioner DeVine encouraged Ground Development to come back before the
Commission with an R-2 development plan.
Mr. Hannah questioned whether he would need to file a new application and pay the
required fee. Mr. March concurred.
Mr. Cooper questioned whether the Commission could give the developer an indication
of whether a plan for R-2 zoning would be approved. Chairperson Hanson stated that a
review of revised plans, a public hearing, remedies to previous requests and
commission's approval needed to be granted and felt that it was inappropriate to
speculate their decision prior to the above process.
Mr. Cooper stated that it was his understanding that changing to R-2 zoning would
eliminate four lots but everything else would remain the same. Mr. Cooper also stated
that Ground Development would like to get a feel for whether the plan would be
approved with R-2 zoning. Chairperson Hanson stated that in his opinion a plan with R-2
zoning had a better chance for approval than the PUD plans submitted.
Commissioner DeVine questioned whether Mr. March could point out any differences
between the PUD plan and R-2 zoning. Mr. March stated that he would need to see the
plan but said the minimum lot size width and depth would be larger. Mr. March stated
that the Comprehensive Plan called for a low to medium density development therefore,
R-2 and R-5 zoning are in line with the Comprehensive Plan.
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers stated that the Ground Development's plan assumes
the MUSA line swap will be approved. Council Liaison Broussard Vickers stated that
any plan approved by the City would be contingent upon receiving approval of the
MUSA line swap.
Mr. March stated that it is unrealistic to assume that all approvals required for the
development could be obtained by December 15, 2000.
Chairperson Hanson told Ground Development that the City appreciated his show of
good faith in addressing all the issues raised by the City and residents.
Motion by Commissioner Brainard. seconded by Commissioner Killian to deny
approval of the Ground Development Preliminary Plat - PUD. All in favor. Motion
carried unanimously.
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers thanked members of the audience for their input
regarding this issue. Council Liaison Broussard Vickers stated that the City has a
Comprehensive Plan for development and the school district has had and is aware of.
The development discussed fits within the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan. The
City of Centerville could stop development, but neighboring communities such as Lino
Lakes are not required to do so. Therefore, the City of Lino Lakes could continue to
develop and send children to Centerville schools. The City of Centerville is a developing
community and legally the City cannot stop the development from coming in unless it has
just cause.
3. Ordinance #4 Amendments
Mr. March submitted information concerning possible amendments to Ordinance #4 and
asked the Commissioners to review the information and bring any modifications or
suggestions to the work session.
VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS
Commissioner Brainard noted his displeasure with the City Council for granting a
variance request the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended denial. He felt
the request was granted for a purely political reason and opened the City up for legal
liability. He requested that in the future when Council goes against the recommendation
of the Planning and Zoning Commission and grants a variance, the Council be required to
provide specific examples as to how the requirements for the variance were met.
Commissioner Kilian agreed with Commissioner Brainard on this matter.
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated she was not at the meeting the
Commissioners were referring to but would bring the comments of Commissioner
Brainard and Kilian to the Council.
VII. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
1. October 3, 2000 Meeting Minutes
Chairperson Hanson requested the seconded portion of the first motion on Page 13 be
changed from "Hanson" to "LaMotte".
Motion by Commissioner DeVine. seconded by Commissioner Sheppard to approve
the October 3. 2000 Meeting Minutes with the reQuested chane:e. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimously.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Commissioner Sheppard. seconded by Commissioner Kilian to adiourn
the November 14. 2000 Plannine: Commission Meetine: at 9:09 p.m. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimously.
Transcribed by:
Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
.
PRESENT: Mayor Tom Wilharber
Council Member Dick Travis
Council Member Terry Sweeney
Council Member Linda Broussard Vickers
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOVEMBER 8, 2000
6:00 p.m.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly sc
meeting on November 8, 2000, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street.
ABSENT: Council Member Mari Nelson
STAFF: City Administrator, Jim March
City Engineer, Tom P rson
I.
Mayor Wilharbe
p.m.
II.
to
III.
lers and Associates, gave a brief overview of the expansion plans for
st Products and the tax abatement process.
b Council Member Broussard Vickers seconded b Council Member
ne to close the ublic hearin . All in favor. Motion carried unanimousl .
Mayor Wilharber closed the public hearing at 6:06 p.m.
2. Delinquent Utilities for 2001 Certification
Page I ofl 0
Mayor Wilharber opened the public hearing at 6:07 p.m.
Mr. March noted that several residents had paid their delinquent amounts prior to the
public hearing.
Council Member Sweeney questioned whether the City could hire a collection agency
rather than certifYing the delinquent amounts with Anoka County.
Mr. March indicated that an assessment would be attached to the property whether or not
the property owner filed bankruptcy. If a collection agency was used, and the City
obtained a civil judgment, same could be discharged in the case of bankruptcy. City
Attorney Hoeft confirmed.
Council Member Sweeney stated that he was concerned that the list contained several
property owners who consistently are delinquent. Council Member Sweeney questioned
whether a property owner could write off the assessment as a property tax when filing
taxes. City Attorney Hoeft indicated it would be improper to attempt to write off an
assessment as a property tax. The property tax statement received from the County will
differentiate between taxes and assessment amounts.
Council Member Broussard Vickers expressed concern that the property owners with
delinquent utilities are essentially receiving an interest free loan for minimal
administrative fee of $25. Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned whether the
administrative fee could be increased. City Attorney Hoeft confirmed, provided the City
stayed within the allowable usury laws.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned whether the names of individuals with
delinquent utilities could be published. City Attorney Hoeft confirmed. Mr. March
stated he would prefer to notifY residents, prior to the public hearing process, that their
names and addresses would be published if unpaid prior to that point. Mr. March felt that
this may prompt residents to satisfY amounts that are delinquent.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded bv Council Member
Sweeney to close the public headn!!. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
IV. APPEARANCES/AWARDS
None.
V. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
1. October 25,2000 Meeting Minutes
Mr. March requested the following modifications: Page 3, first paragraph, change "3x3"
to "3 foot wide by 16 foot long". As a side note, Mr. March informed Council that the
property owners would repair their driveway in the spring and would like the City to
repair the end of the driveway at the same time. Page 6, second paragraph, add "or if
additional monies need to be expended"; Page 7, under the Administrator's Report in the
Page 2 of 10
first paragraph, change "meeting" to "meet"; Page 7, under Administrator's Report in the
third paragraph, add "is"; In the following sentence, change "relocations" to
"relocation" .
Motion bv Conncil Member Sweeney, seconded bv Council Member Travis to
approve the October 25, 2000, City Council Meetine: Minutes with the noted
chane:es. AIl in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
The City ofCentervilIe October 26. through November 8.2000
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney, seconded bv Council Member Travis to
approve the expenditures for the City from October 26, 2000 throue:h November 8,
2000. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv,
Centennial Fire District Expenses
Motion bv Conncil Member Travis, seconded bv Council Member Sweeney to
approve the Centennial Fire District expenditures in the amount of $39,957.94. AIl
in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Pav Estimate #1 - Lift Station #2
City Engineer Peterson, stated that the presented pay estimate included work completed
through October 27, 2000. The Pay Estimate included billing for the following services:
demolition and removal of the existing pumps and controls; installation of the valve
vault; installation of the new pumps; all underground piping; and initial site work.
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney, seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to approve Pav Estimate #1 for Lift Station #2 in the amount of $41,714.50.
All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
VII. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated that she had received a telephone call
concerning the condition of the residence located at 7121 Centerville Road. She noted
the item was on the agenda and would reserve comment until the item was heard.
Mayor Wilharber indicated he had received several complaints concerning an ongoing
garage sale at the intersection of Peltier Lake Drive and Main Street and requested that a
letter be forwarded to the property owner notifYing them of the nuisance ordinance.
Council Member Sweeney stated he had received a complaint concerning the closing of
Centerville Road due to the sewer leak.
l
Mr. March indicated he had received a call from the on-duty, Public Works employee at
approximately 7:00 a.m. on Saturday concerning a leak in the 10" sewer force main
Page 3 of 10
running under Centerville Road. The on-duty, Public Works employee responded to the
area and notified the appropriate officials concerning the leak. Mr. March indicated he
had contact the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to question whether there was a
sewage spill the City should be aware of. He was informed that a representative was
researching the matter and would be contacting him on Thursday, November 9, 2000
with the requested information.
Mr. March also stated that there was a recent sewer leak at the intersection of Old Mill
Road and Peltier Lake Drive. Mr. March stated that property owners within the area have
private wells and expressed concern that their wells may have been contaminated with
bacteria as a consequence of the leak. Several residents sent individual water samples to
a lab for analysis and several of the samples were found to be contaminated. Several of
the same residents contacted the City to inform the City of the problem. The City
arranged to take individual samples from the affected residences and forwarded same to
the lab used by the City. Those samples were found to contain no bacteria. The lab used
independently by the residents has since admitted to having contaminated samples.
Mayor Wilharber questioned whether the City had a responsibility to immediately inform
residents of a sewer leak in areas where residents have private wells. City Engineer
Peterson indicated that the Public Works staff acted appropriately to contain the spill and
notified the proper authorities. Mr. Peterson also stated that it would be informative and
courteous to notify residents in similar situations.
VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Resolution 00-30 Cable Franchise Extension
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Broussard
Vickers to approve Resolution 00-30. a Resolution Extendine the Term of the Cable
Franchise Granted to MediaOne North Central Communications Corp.. d/b/a
AT&T Broadband. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution 00-31 - Awarding Sale of $650.000 G.O. Improvement Bond (Hunter's
Crossing)
Mr. George Eilertson, Juran and Moody, presented information to Council on three (3)
bids received for financing the bond. The lowest bid contained the lowest net interest and
was submitted by United Banker's Bank.
A typographical error was noted "Country Bank" should be changed to "County Bank".
Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded by Council Member
Sweeney to adopt Resolution 00-31. a Resolution Awardine the Sale of $650.000
General Obli~ation Improvement Bonds of 2000 Fixine their Form and
Specifications; Directine Their Execution and Delivery; and Providing for their
Payment to United Banker's Bank. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Page 4 of 10
Lawn Care Service Bids
Mr. March stated that the presented bids were received from Valley Creek Lawn &
Landscape, Inc., the City's current lawn service provider, and Grass Roots Lawn &
Snow. The bid from Valley Creek Lawn & Landscape, Inc., was approximately $500
less than that of Grass Roots Lawn & Snow.
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Travis. to
acceut the Bid of Vallev Creek Lawn & Landscaue, Inc., for Lawn Care Services for
2001. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
Northern Forest Products
Mr. Paul McDowell, Northern Forest Products, appeared before Council and indicated his
company is still in the planning stage for the expansion. The site has been graded and
nothing has changed since he was before Council previously.
Council Member Broussard Vickers inquired as to whether all the terms and conditions
of the tax abatement were agreeable to Mr. McDowell. Mr. McDowell indicated they
were.
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to adout Resolution 00-33, a Resolution Authorizinl! a Five (5) Year Tax
Abatement for the Northern Forest Products Exuansion. All in favor. Motion
carried unanimouslv.
Ground Develooment - Pheasant Marsh PUD
Mr. Terry Hannah, Ground Development, appeared before Council and informed them of
the status of the Pheasant Marsh Planned Unit Development (PUD). Mr. Hannah stated
that he has met with the two (2) property owners to the north of the development in
regards to driveway access. Mr. Hannah stated that they are currently driving over a
sewer easement and mayor may not have a valid easement to do so.
Mayor Wilharber questioned whether the use of the easement by the residents for an
extended period of time entitles them to continue to do so. City Attorney Hoeft indicated
it is possible that the residents may be entitled to use the land due to the length of time
involved.
Council Member Sweeney stated that the Parks and Recreation Committee had expressed
an interest in having the trailway run over the same easement.
Mr. March stated that he had received three (3) e-mails concerning the timing of the
development in relation to the overcrowding of the elementary schools. Conncil Member
Sweeney also stated that he had received calls concerning the development and noted the
City's Comprehensive Plan indicated the area is scheduled for development between the
Page 5 of 10
years 200 I and 2005. Council Member Sweeney stated that the school district should
have been aware of the coming development and as the timing of the development is in
line with the Comprehensive Plan there should not be a cause for concern.
Mayor Wilharber questioned whether the developer had made the modifications
previously requested by Council. Mr. Hannah indicated that he had made the
modifications and would be presenting the revised plan to Council at the public hearing.
Resolution 00-32 - Delinquent Utilities
Motion bv Council Member Travis, seconded bv Council Member Sweenev to
Approve Resolution 00-32, a Resolution Authorizing the City to add a 10% Late fee
and an additional $25.00 administrative fee to the delinquent utilitv bills and
authorizin2 the amounts to be certified to the Anoka County Auditor to appear on
2001 property tax statements.
Council Member Sweeney stated that he would like a letter sent to the individuals on the
delinquent utility bill list informing them if they are on the list next year that their names
will be published.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she would like to publish the names
commencing next year. She also indicated she would like to increase the administrative
fee and interest rate if possible.
Consensus was to direct City Attorney Hoeft to research the administrative fee and
interest rate under the usury laws and report back to Council.
All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Election Canvassin2
Mayor Wilharber read the election statistics as presented by the City Clerk/Treasurer.
Motion by COllncil Member Brollssard Vickers, seconded by Council Member
Travis to accept the election canvassinl! as presented. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
Joint Law Enforcement Council
Mr. March stated that the City needed to approve an amendment to the By-Laws of the
Anoka County Joint Law Enforcement Council to become an official member. Mr.
March stated that the amendment allows for City representation. Mr. March also stated
that the Centennial Lakes Police Department Police Chief and the Centennial Lakes
Police Department Police Commission Chair would be representing the City.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council Member
Sweeney, to approve the amendment to the By-Laws of the Anoka County Joint
Law Enforcement Council allowinl! the Centennial Lakes Police Denartment Police
Page 6 of 10
Chief and the Centennial Lakes Police Deoartment Police Commission Chair
represent the City. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Woiak Sewer Revair/Servicing Reimbursement
Mr. March submitted a request from Mr. Larry Woiak, 6925 Centerville Road, for
reimbursement for sewer repairs due to improper installation of the City's sewer line.
Council Member Travis questioned the possibility of an "even exchange" due to the fact
that Mr. W oiak was not paying for City services while receiving them. Mayor Wilharber
clarified that the previous home owner was not paying for services and that Mr. Woiak
had come to the City informing them of the problems that his residence was experiencing
and at that point the City commenced billing.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned whether the problems experienced by
Mr. Woiak were due to the line located in the City's right-of-way or in the connection
line from the residence to the City's stub. City Engineer Peterson stated that the line had
disconnected due to the angle of installation and tree root growth was causing the
problems. City Attorney Hoeft stated that if the problem is in the City's line it is then the
responsibility of the City to pay for repairs. City Engineer Peterson confirmed that this
was the case.
Council Member Travis requested that staff research a $40 notation to ensure that this
amount had not previously been reimbursed.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded bv Council Member
Travis to reimburse Mr. W oiak for sewer repair UP to $630.50 and directin~ staff to
investil!ate the $40. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
City Hall Updating
Mr. March presented several proposals for updating furniture, telephone system, copy
machine, painting and carpeting City Hall. The estimate for the total upgrade as
presented is approximately $54,000.
Council Member Sweeney requested that the walls be furred out and insulated to prevent
cold air from radiating into the offices from the concrete walls.
Mayor Wilharber questioned whether the funds were included in the budget. Mr. March
indicated it was not included in the budget. Council Member Sweeney questioned
whether funds were available for the upgrade. Mr. March recommended using the
remaining capital outlet funds for the year and using funds from the general fund for the
remainder.
Mayor Wilharber stated that City employees have been scraping by with "odds and ends"
for equipment and noted it was time to improve equipment and furniture.
Page 7 of 10
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Travis to
approve the up!!:rades to City Hall as presented bv Mr. March includin!!: furring out
and insulatin!!: the exposed block walls in the administrative offices. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimouslv.
Ground Development - Pheasant Marsh PUD
This item was heard earlier in the meeting.
Appraisals - Turcotte Pro\:lertv
Mr. March submitted an appraisal of the Turcotte property for Council review.
Council Member Sweeney stated that the Parks & Recreation Committee was interested
in adding a portion of the property located on the same block to Laurie LaMotte
Memorial Park.
Mayor Wilharber stated that the Turcotte property would be an intricate parcel if the City
intended on redeveloping the block.
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated she felt that the value ofthe property would
steadily increase and the City would benefit from purchasing same.
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney seconded bv Council Member Travis to
authorize staff to enter into negotiations to purchase the Turcotte -property. All iu
favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Notice of Sub-Standard Building - 7121 Centerville Road
Mr. March presented pictures of the property located at 7121 Centerville Road. Mr.
March noted there were two (2) additional properties within the City that Staff is in the
process of citing for similar violations.
Council Member Broussard Vickers inquired as to how the process for handling similar
situations may be completed more effectively and. City Attorney Hoeft indicated the
property needs to be declared a sub-standard property for each violation and can not be
determined to be a constant problem. This means the City needs to initiate the process
each time the problem occurs and would not be allowed to contract for services to
continually keep the property up to required standards.
Subsequent to lengthy discussion, consensus was that Staff be directed to investigate all
possible ordinance violation complaints, including verbal and anonymous complaints.
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Travis to direct
Staff to investi!!:ate written. verbal and anonymous complaints concernin!!: possible
ordinance violations. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Page 8 of 10
~ -
X. CONSENT AGENDA
None.
XI. COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council Member Sweeney reported that the Parks & Recreation Committee had
discussed the Pheasant Marsh Planned Unit Development (PUD) and had noted concern
for lot sizes and the location of the trailway. Council Member Sweeney also noted the
Parks & Recreation Committee would like to propose mitigating some of the wetland
near the back comer of the property for a future park in the event the property to the
south is developed.
Council Member Sweeney reported on the various activities of the Parks & Recreation
Committee indicating the desire of the Committee to carry remaining funds forward for
next year's projects.
Mr. March indicated a representative from the proposed Lino Lakes YMCA had
expressed an interest in working in conjunction with the City to build a skate park.
Council Member Travis indicated that the Economic Development Committee meeting
was scheduled for next week.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated the Planning and Zoning Committee
meeting was scheduled for next week.
Mayor Wilharber indicated the Police Commission meeting was scheduled for Thursday,
November 9, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. He then clarified information reported in the newspaper
concerning the underage drinking at Water Works Beach Club. Police Officers make
arrests outside of the establishment of underage individuals either drinking in their
vehicles or in the parking lot. These arrests are reported as being at Water Works Beach
Club which means they did not occur within the establishment. Mayor Wilharber stated
that if Water Works Beach Club had underage drinking occurring within the
establishment they would lose their liquor license.
XII. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
Mr. March noted the next regularly scheduled meeting fell on the Wednesday before
Thanksgiving and inquired as to whether the Council would like to reschedule the
meeting to November 20, 2000.
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Travis to
reschedule the Citv Council MeetiUl: from November 22. 2000 to November 20.
2000. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned whether Mr. March had requested
information from the City Attorney concerning the possibility of placing a moratorium on
development within the City.
Page 90flO
City Attorney Hoeft reported that the City could place a moratorium on development;
however, the City would be required to perform various studies to determine how
additional development would affect the City. Mr. Hoeft stated that it be beneficial if the
City took a proactive approach by declaring a development moratorium and begin the
studies rather than trying to discourage a developer once they have presented the City
with development plans. A moratorium could last up to 2 Y, years, but rarely does as the
studies are completed prior to the expiration ofthe 2 Y, year period.
Council Member Sweeney questioned the cost of the studies required. Mr. Hoeft
indicated that the City would need to hire outside consultants and felt that it would be
very costly for a city such as the size of Centerville.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated the City does have the means to stop development;
however, suggested that a moratorium not be taken lightly.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
Motion bv Conncil Member Sweeney, seconded bv Council Member Travis to
adiourn the November 8, 2000 City Council Meetine at 8:30 D.m. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimously.
Transcribed by:
Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
Page 10 of 10
.
,
.
I.
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOVEMBER 20, 2000
6:00 p.m.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly sched j
meeting on November 20, 2000, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street.
PRESENT: Mayor Tom Wilharber
Council Member Dick Travis
Council Member Terry Sweeney
Council Member Linda Broussard Vickers
Council Member Mari Nelson
ABSENT: None.
STAFF: City Administrato
City Engineer, To .
Public Works Dir
license renewals and bids for interior wall
CES/AWARDS
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
1. November 8, 2000 Meeting Minutes
Page lof9
Council Member Sweeney requested that on Page 3 the reference to "Sweeney noted
received complaint concerning road closure" be changed to "Travis". Council Member
Travis requested on Page 7 a change from "outlet" to "outlay".
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Travis to
approve the November 8. 2000. City Council Meetin~ Minutes with the noted
changes. Council Member Nelson abstained. Motion carried.
VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
The City of Centerville November 9. through November 20. 2000
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Travis to
approve the expenditures for the City from November 9. 2000 through November
20. 2000. Ail in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Centennial Fire District Expenses
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to approve the Centennial Fire District expenditures in the amount of
$27.844.21. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Council Member Sweeney clarified the $12,000 common area expense for the Centennial
Fire District and stated that the common area is used for training at Station #2 in Lino
Lakes. Council Member Sweeney explained that there is an agreement in place that the
cost of the common area room be divided among the cities.
Pay Estimate #3 - Hunter's Crossing
Mr. Peterson indicated this is Pay Estimate #3 for Hunter's Crossing. The sanitary sewer
and water main have been installed and tested by Northdale Construction, along
Centerville Road and throughout the development. Street construction is complete for
the 2000 construction season and restoration work is ongoing.
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Travis to
approve Pay Estimate #3 for Hunter's Crossing in the amount of $52.122.65. All in
favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Pay Estimate #2 - Lift Station #2
Mr. Peterson indicated Pay Estimate #2 for Lift Station #2 is primarily for the force main
replacement which was added to Penn Contracting's contract as a change order.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded bv Council Member
Sweeney to approve Pay Estimate #2 for Lift Station #2 in the amount of $63.550.93.
All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Page 2 of9
VII. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS
Mr. March stated that he had heard several rumors concerning the City Council's
approval of expenditures to update City Hall. Mr. March explained that the quote was for
$50,928.00 which includes new paint, new carpet, all new office furniture, a new copier,
and a new telephone system. The City Council has also approved the furring out of the
outside office walls as they radiate cold air and make for an uncomfortable working
environment. Those bids will be presented later in the meeting.
Mr. March clarified that there is extra capital to be used for this project because there
have been several projects that funds were budgeted for that were not approved or not
acted upon. There were funds budgeted for this project at one point and then the upgrade
was voted down.
Mr. March noted that if Council deemed fit they have the ability to lower the tax levy.
He then invited residents to either call City Hall to express their opinions or to attend the
Truth in Taxation Hearing scheduled for December 4, 2000 at 6:00 p.m.
Council Member Sweeney stated that he had been personally questioned concerning the
City Hall upgrade at a business in town. Council Member Sweeney stated that he had
given the person the exact dollar amounts. Despite having the correct facts, Council
Member Sweeney later learned that this person had conveyed incorrect facts to another
resident, thereby perpetuating the negative rumors concerning the update.
Council Member Sweeney stated that the original quotes for the various components of
the upgrade had been obtained several months prior to presentation at the November 8,
2000 City Council Meeting. To indicate, as residents have, that this was a politically
motivated agenda item is inappropriate and he feels personally attacked. Council
Member Sweeney noted he believed that Council has acted fiscally responsibly during
the course of their tenure.
Council Member Sweeney stated that there may be other ways to expend the extra
capital, but he feels the update to City Hall is justified and appropriate at this time.
Council Member Nelson indicated she had originally voted to keep the tax levy the same
as citizens had told her they liked the way things were. She indicated she had a question
as to whether a possible buildout of more offices in City Hall or a possible expansion to
City Hall had been considered in the current plans for the upgrade. Mr. March explained
to her previously that the upgrade would not be a waste of money should a major change
to City Hall occur. Having this information from Mr. March she feels comfortable with
approving the updates to City Hall.
Council Member Travis stated that he was at City Hall on election night waiting for the
results and City Hall was crowded and after spending the entire evening there it was clear
to him that City Hall needs the proposed updates. He then invited residents to come to
City Hall and look around. The upgrades are long overdue and he feels most of the items
on the list are a simple matter of maintenance to the building.
Page 3 of9
Mayor Wilharber stated that he was surprised that anyone would say that approval of the
update for City Hall was politically motivated. He indicated staff came to the new
building in 1992 and brought along all of the old furniture and equipment. There has not
been anything new added over the course of the last eight years. Any equipment or
furniture has been obtained through hand-me-downs or governmental surplus sales. It is
time for a proper update of furniture and equipment for City Hall. The other items such
as paint and carpet are simply a matter of maintenance for the building. Mayor Wilharber
also indicated that with the exception of Council Member Nelson not one other Council
Member had received a call concerning the matter. He invited residents to come to the
meetings and/or contact City Hall to express their opinions. He has no problem
recommending approval of this expenditure.
Motion bv Mavor Wilharber. seconded bv Council Member Nelson to approve the
submitted bid from R.J. Sheppard Construction in the amount of $3.340.00 for the
furrin!! out. insulatin!!. and runnin!! of electrical outlets alon!! the outside block
walls within the office area of City Hall. Council Member Broussard Vickers
abstained. Motion carried.
Council Member Sweeney stated that the bid for painting may need to be adjusted to take
into account the new sheetrock as it will absorb more paint.
City Attorney Hoeft stated that any additional amounts for painting may be approved in
the future as a change order.
Council Member Nelson stated that she had received a complaint from a mother
concerning the ice rink in her neighborhood and questionable activity. This mother
believes it to be drug related. The mother has requested that Council set-up police patrol
on this area. Mayor Wilharber stated he would pass the information on to the police
department.
Mayor Wilharber read a letter from Ms. Monica Travis in support of the Pheasant Marsh
development. She feels the development would be an asset to the community while
expanding the tax base.
VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
Schlavin Variance Request - Sign
Mr. March stated that Mr. Schlavin had requested a variance to install a 4x6 illuminated
business sign. Current ordinance allows a two square foot sign as Mr. Schlavin is
currently governed under the home-based business ordinance. This item was presented to
the Planning and Zoning Commission on November 14, 2000 and the Planning and
Zoning Commission voted unanimously to deny the request due to the fact that the
request did not meet the four criteria for granting a variance. The Planning and Zoning
Commission invited Mr. Schlavin to attend the workshops scheduled to discuss the
Page 4 of9
changes to the sign ordinance. They also requested he bring tax information to the
meeting as he had indicated at the meeting he was being taxed commercially for that part
of the structure being used for his business.
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to deny the Schlavin variance reauest. Nelson. Sweeney. Travis and
Broussard Vickers - ave. Mavor Wilharber - nay. Motion carried.
Council Member Travis questioned whether the Planning and Zoning Commission
intended to change the sign ordinance to allow for a larger sign for businesses located in a
mostly commercial area or on a county road. Council Member Broussard Vickers stated
that the Planning and Zoning Commission is revisiting the issue at their workshop and
had invited Mr. Schlavin to help them with the decision making process. It was the
consensus of the Committee that provisions needed to be made to allow larger signs for
home-based businesses located in a mainly commercial district or on a county road.
Mayor Wilharber questioned whether there are other home-based businesses in the
community being taxed commercially. Mr. March indicated he did not have the
information readily accessible.
Mayor Wilharber stated that home-based businesses take away from the business tax base
for the City. Mr. March stated that the City tried to address the issue of providing for
home-based businesses while not taking away tax base from the City during the rewriting
of Ordinance #4. Mr. March also stated a need for constraints for the home-based
businesses while still allowing them to operate within the City.
Ground Develooment - Pheasant Marsh PUD
Mr. Terry Hannah, Ground Development, submitted information to the Planning and
Zoning Commission at the November 14, 2000 meeting. The proposed PUD requests an
eighty-eight (88) lot subdivision. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted to deny
approval of the PUD based on the fact that the plat did not meet the minimum
requirements for a PUD. The primary reason for denial was the plan did not contain a
minimum of 20% common open space. The developer had shown a 21.7% open space
area but same consisted of rear yards and other private areas. The developer has since
resubmitted a revised plat and request for PUD. The revised plat is reported to contain
seventy-eight (78) lots and allow for the required common open space. Staff and the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommend the PUD request be denied.
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Nelson to deny
approval of the submitted Pheasant Marsh pun as recommended by Planninl! and
Zoninl! Commission. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Council Member Travis questioned whether the PUD in the Council packet was the same
as reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission or if it was the revised plan. Mr.
March indicated it was the same plat as reviewed by the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
Page 5 of9
Mr. DeVine, a member of the audience and Planning and Zoning, questioned whether the
revised plat was for a PUD or for R-2 zoning as the developer had indicated he would
resubmit to reflect R-2 zoning. Mr. March stated that the developer had changed his
mind in regards to R-2 zoning and submitted a revised plat for PUD.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated her desire to have staff obtain information
on the school boundaries and the MUSA Comprehensive Plan for the City of Lino Lakes.
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated that she would like Council to review the
information and discuss plans to coordinate development with the City of Lino Lakes so
that Centerville is not negatively impacted by having a large number of children from
outside of the City boundaries attending Centerville schools.
Mayor Wilharber proposed having a joint meeting with the school district and the City of
Lino lakes concerning development and its impact on the school district.
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated that the Comprehensive Plan has been
available for three (3) years and the school district should not have been surprised by the
proposed Pheasant Marsh development. Council Member Broussard Vickers stated that
she would like to get the information concerning the school boundaries and MUSA plans
for the City of Lino Lakes prior to the joint meeting. Mr. March stated that residents of
Centerville along with the City Council need to have a strong voice when the school
boundaries are redrawn. The oldest schools have the highest density.
Council Member Sweeney stated that there are temporary classrooms at the school that
have been there for several years. The library has also been converted to classrooms that
do not have doors which is very distracting. The issue of overcrowding needs to be
addressed to provide a quality education for the children of Centerville.
Mayor Wilharber stated that all one needs to do is to speak with teachers and
administrators at the schools to understand why enrollment is high. Parents want their
children to go to Centerville schools. He took issue with an article in the Quad
Community Press that stated older people and people with no children typically vote
against the school bond issues. Mayor Wilharber stated that he, his wife, and his elderly
mother all voted in favor of the school bond as children are the future and it is very
important to provide a quality education for them.
Council Member Sweeney stated that the City needed to look at this issue carefully to
ensure that Centerville is not negatively impacted due to growth in the City ofLino Lakes
and that growth's affect on the school district.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated there were residents who were unhappy
with the traffic the new development would bring. There was one resident who was upset
and surprised that there would be a trail running along his property line. He was under
the impression that the undeveloped area next to his property was a nature area. There
were comments from those concerned for the impact on the school district. There was
also a concern for the driveways of two (2) residents to the north of the development.
Mayor Wilharber questioned how those two (2) residents currently access their property.
Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated one (I) of the residents had indicated he
Page 6 of9
had an easement but the developer has been unable to locate any information on the
easement.
Council Member Sweeney questioned if that area was the easement area for the sewer
force main. Council Member Broussard Vickers stated she believed so.
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated that approval of any plan from the developer
was contingent upon approval of a MUSA line swap.
Mr. March stated that he did receive a call from one (I) property owner adjacent to the
proposed development who had questions concerning the development but was very open
to the development coming to town.
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated that one (I) resident expressed concern for a
park located in the development to accommodate children who now have to cross Main
Street to go to the park. Council Member Sweeney stated that the Parks and Recreation
Committee had mentioned having the developer mitigate a portion of the wetland located
on the east side of the development for a small park to be added onto should the property
to the south develop in the future.
Consensus was to invite the Superintendent of Schools to a future Council meeting to
discuss development in Centerville and its impact on Centerville's schools.
Holidav Celebration - Request for Funding
Mayor Wilharber questioned as to the dollar amount expended for last year's celebration.
Mr. March indicated it was $796.38.
Council Member Sweeney questioned whether the approval was for "not to exceed"
$850.00, meaning the party may not cost $850.00. Mr. March concurred.
Motion bv Council Member Nelson to approve $800.00 for the holidav celebration.
The motion died for lack of a second.
Motion bv Council Member Travis. seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to approve $850.00 for the holiday celebration. Sweeney. Travis. Broussard
Vickers and Wilharber - ave. Nelson - nay. Motion carried.
Liquor and Tobacco License Renewals
Mr. March submitted liquor and tobacco license renewals as prepared by staff.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned whether all renewal license applicants
had provided the proper insurance. Mr. March indicated proof of insurance is a
requirement of the renewal process.
Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded by Council Member
Sweenev. to approve the liquor and tobacco license renewals as presented by staff
Page 7 of9
provided the proper insurance information is received. Sweenev. Travis. Broussard
Vickers and Wilharber - aye. Nelson - nav. Motion carried.
X. CONSENT AGENDA
Resignation of Police Commission Chair - Madv Reiter
Mayor Wilharber read a letter of resignation from Police Commission Chair, Mady
Reiter, submitted due to her recent election as Senator for District 53.
Mayor Wilharber complimented Ms. Reiter on a job well done and indicated the Police
Commission will miss her. The Police Commission has begun the process of replacing
Ms. Reiter.
Motion bv Mavor Wilharber. seconded bv Council Member Nelson. to accel)t the
resil!Uation of Police Commission Chair. Madv Reiter. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimouslv.
Xl. COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council Member Travis stated that the Economic Development Committee meeting was
scheduled for Tuesday, November 21,2000.
Council Member Sweeney had no information to report from the Parks and Recreation
Committee meeting. The Cable Commission meeting was moved to December 13, 2000
and they are expecting to finalize the new franchise documents. That meeting is
scheduled for the same night as the Council meeting so a Staff liaison will need to be
appointed to attend the Cable Commission meeting. Council Member Sweeney also
stated that since he did not seek re-election to the Council the new Council would need to
appoint either a Council liaison to attend Cable Commission meetings or a Staff liaison.
Attendance at the meetings is very important or the City could lose some of its franchise
fees.
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission is
working on revisions to the sign ordinance and has workshops planned to discuss the
Issue.
Mayor Wilharber stated that the Police Commission met on November 9,2000. The new
police officer is off of temporary status. The new Council will need to appoint a Council
Liaison to the Police Commission.
XlI. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
Mr. March stated the Truth in Taxation Hearing is scheduled for December 4, 2000. The
continuation hearing, if necessary, is scheduled for December 20,2000.
Staff has received an offer of $16,000 for the purchase of the Green, Ford F250. Mr.
March reported that it cost the City $1,000 for each of the four (4) years the City used
the truck.
Page 8 of9
Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Nelson to
accept the offer of $16.000 to purchase the Green. Ford F250. All in favor. Motion
carried unanimously.
Mayor Wilharber thanked Mr. March and Mr. Palzer for a job well done indicating the
City and City residents owe them a debt of gratitude for their diligence in working to save
the City money.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Travis to
adjourn the November 20. 2000 City Council Meetinl! at 7:35 p.m. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimously.
Transcribed by:
Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
Page 9 of9
CENlERVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
NOVEMBER 21, 2000
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Centerville Economic Development
Committee held their regularly scheduled meeting on November 21,2000 at City Hall,
1880 Main Street.
Present:
Chairperson Tim Rehbine
Committee Member Lori Dorn (departed at 8:10 p.m.)
Committee Member John Magill
Committee Member Michelle Moser
Committee Member Betsy Scheller
Committee Member Mary Capra
Committee Member Dick Travis (Council liaison)
Absent:
Committee Member Paul Montain
Staff:
Kris Sweeney
APPEARANCES
Katie Erickson from Hair Update and Tan arrived approximately 7:05pm. She stated that
Hair Update and Tan would be relocating into Lloyd Drilling's new building. They will
open a Spa, which would include; tanning, hair salon, barbershop, pedicures, manicures,
etc. She currently has 12 employees, and when they move into their new building they
will have more tanning booths. She also mentioned that her husband would be putting a
movie rental store next door.
One of the committee members asked how the process of moving into Centerville was.
Ms. Erickson stated the move went very smoothly.
The Committee and Ms Erickson discussed briefly the sign ordinance. Mr. Travis asked
Ms. Erickson if the size of a sign matters to local businesses. Ms. Erickson explained
that it's not necessarily the size but a sign is important to any business.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Tim Rehbine called the meeting to order at approximately 7:40 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
October 17, 2000, Economic Development Committee Meeting Minutes were approved
with one correction.
Motion bv Ms. Scheller. seconded bv Ms. Dorn to approve the October 17.2000.
Economic Development Committee Meetin2 Minutes. All in favor. Motion carried.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Design T earn - "Ideas in Action"
Historical Markers - Ms. Capra stated that she is waiting to here from the church in
Michigan regarding their historical marker. She also stated that the historical markers are
still being planned and worked on.
It was mentioned that Mayor Williarber will be donating his time to fix the old :fire truck
at the old Public Works and that there was an allowance not to exceed $1,000.00.
Downtown Revitalization - no update
EDC wishes to present plants to the County Bank when their building is completed.
Four (4) Centerville mugs were presented to ADL, Goetz Landscape, and Federated
Insurance Company, and R & K Cafe.
Star City Goals
Wintcr Carnival Activities - still in the brainstorming process until next year.
Ms. Scheller spoke with Todd Murawski, Wargo Nature Center, regarding Snow Days.
Ms. Scheller commented that Mr. Murawski stated that EDC could sponsor a table or an
activity at this event. Snow Days will take place on January 27,2001 from 10 a.m. to 1
p.m. Ms. Scheller will see if Mr. Murawski would like to make an appearance at the
December 18, 2000 EDC meeting.
Citv Merchandise
The level of city merchandise was discussed and will remain the same.
2001 Budget
The 2001 budget was accepted with revenues brought forward to the year 2001.
A motioned was made by Ms. Capra to accept the 2001 budget, seconded by Ms.
Scheller. All in favor. Motioned carried unanimously.
The positions of Chairman and Vice Chairman were discussed briefly. Ms. Capra
position was also discussed and was agreed that they would advertise for her position.
A motioned was made by Ms. Capra to advertise for her position on the Economic
Development Committee, seconded by Ms. Scheller. All in favor. Motioned carried
nnanimously.
NEW BUSINESS
By-laws
The by-laws were discussed briefly.
Nominations for Chair and Vice Chair were discussed and the committee will vote on it
at the meeting in December.
Businesses, Citizen of the Year, and Lifetime Achievement Awards were discussed. The
ballot form would be in the January issue of the Le Journal. These forms need to be
returned by February. EDC will count the nomination forms and determine the outcome
at the February meeting. These awards will not be presented at the Holiday Party in the
future.
Ms. Capra wanted to thank the Lino Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce for sponsoring
the forum. Nlr. Rehbine mentioned that there were 46 businesses in the Lino Lakes Area
Chamber of Commerce and soon to be 47 when the County Bank joins.
Welcome packets were discussed. Ms. Scheller suggested that a checklist be added to the
commercial packets so new businesses coming in to town would know what they would
need to have complete before any inspections.
A business survey was mentioned. It would ask questions such as - What would a small
business like to see from the Economic Development Committee (i.e. workshops,
speakers, etc.) Ms. Scheller volunteered to put this together.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion bv Mr. Magill, seconded bv Ms. Scheller to adiourn the Novembel' 21,2000,
EDC Meeting. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Meeting adjourned at approximately 9:07 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
Kris Sweeney
City Staff
.
CENlERVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
NOVEMBER 21, 2000
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Centerville Economic Development
Committee held their regularly scheduled meeting on November 21, 2000 at City Hall,
1880 Main Street.
Present:
Chairperson Tim Rehbine
Committee Member Lori Dorn (departed at 8:10 p.rn.)
Committee Member John Magill
Committee Member Michelle Moser
Committee Member Betsy Scheller
Committee Member Mary Capra
Committee Member Dick Travis (Council liaison)
Absent:
Committee Member Paul Montain
Staff:
Kris Sweeney
APPEARANCES
Katie Erickson from Hair Update and Tan arrived approximately 7:05pm. She stated that
Hair Update and Tan would be relocating into Lloyd Drilling's new building. They will
open a Spa, which would include; tanning, hair salon, barbershop, pedicures, manicures,
etc. She currently has 12 employees, and when they move into their new building they
will have more tanning booths. She also mentioned that her husband would be putting a
movie rental store next door.
One ofthe committee members asked how the process of moving into Centerville was.
Ms. Erickson stated the move went very smoothly.
The Committee and Ms Erickson discussed briefly the sign ordinance. Mr. Travis asked
Ms. Erickson if the size of a sign matters to local businesses. Ms. Erickson explained
that it's not necessarily the size but a sign is important to any business.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Tim Rehbine called the meeting to order at approximately 7:40 p.rn.
,
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
October 17, 2000, Economic Development Committee Meeting Minutes were approved
with one correction.
Motion bv Ms. Scheller. seconded bv Ms. Dorn to approve the October 17. 2000,
Economic Development Committee Medin!! Minutes. All in favor. Motion carried.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
DesilUl Team - "Ideas in Action"
Historical Markers - Ms. Capra stated that she is waiting to here from the church in
Michigan regarding their historical marker. She also stated that the historical markers are
still being planned and worked on.
It was mentioned that Mayor Wilharber will be donating his time to fix the old fire truck
at the old Public Works and that there was an allowance not to exceed $1,000.00.
Downtown Revitalization - no update
EDC wishes to present plants to the County Bank when their building is completed.
Four (4) Centerville mugs were presented to ADL, Goetz Landscape, and Federated
Insurance Company, and R & K Cafe.
Star Citv Goals
Winter Carnival Activities - still in the brainstorming process until next year.
Ms. Scheller spoke with Todd Murawski, Wargo Nature Center, regarding Snow Days.
Ms. Scheller co=ented that Mr. Murawski stated that EDC could sponsor a table or an
activity at this event. Snow Days will take place on January 27, 2001 from 10 a.m. to I
p.m. Ms. Scheller will see if Mr. Murawski would like to make an appearance at the
December 18,2000 EDC meeting.
City Merchandise
The level of city merchandise was discussed and will remain the same.
2001 Budget
The 2001 budget was accepted with revenues brought forward to the year 2001.
A motioned was made by Ms. Capra to accept the 2001 budget, seconded by Ms.
Scheller. All in favor. Motioned carried unanimously.
The positions of Chairman and Vice Chairman were discussed briefly. Ms. Capra
position was also diseussed and was agreed that they would advertise for her position.
A motioned was made by Ms. Capra to advertise for her position on the Economic
Development Committee, seconded by Ms. Scheller. All in favor. Motioned carried
nnanimonsly.
NEW BUSINESS
Bv-la'W'S
The by-laws were discussed briefly.
Nominations for Chair and Vice Chair were discussed and the committee will vote on it
at the meeting in December.
Businesses, Citizen of the Year, and Lifetime Achievement Awards were discussed. The
ballot form would be in the January issue of the Le Journal. These forms need to be
returned by February. EDC will count the nomination forms and determine the outcome
at the February meeting. These awards will not be presented at the Holiday Party in the
future.
Ms. Capra wanted to thank the Lino Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce for sponsoring
the forum. Mr. Rehbine mentioned that there were 46 businesses in the Lino Lakes Area
Chamber of Commerce and soon to be 47 when the County Bank joins.
Welcome packets were discussed. Ms. Scheller suggested that a checklist be added to the
commercial packets so new businesses coming in to town would know what they would
need to have complete before any inspections.
A business survey was mentioned. It would ask questions such as - What would a small
business like to see from the Economic Development Committee (i.e. workshops,
speakers, etc.) Ms. Scheller volunteered to put this together.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion bv Mr. Mal!iII. seconded bv Ms. Scheller to adiourn the November 21, 2000,
EDC Meetinl!. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Meeting adjourned at approximately 9:07 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
Kris Sweeney
City Staff
.........ow.... v.......
Jim March
From:
Sent:
To:
Jim March Umarch@goldengate.net)
Friday, December01, 2000 1:54 PM
Wayne LeBlanc; Tom Peterson; Theresa Brenner; Terry Sweeney; Ray Devine; Patricia Scott;
Michelle Moser; Mary Capra; Marl Nelson; Lori Dom; Linda Broussard Vickers; John McLean; Jim
Hoeft; Hanna Tilsen; Elizabeth Scheller; Doug Porter; Dick Travis; Dave Kilian; Brian Walter; Brian
Hanson; Barry Brainard; Aimee Fairbrother; Tim Swedberg
Subject: Week In Review
Week in Review
December 1. 2000
Building Permits this Period = 8
Building Permits YTD = 190
New Homes Year to Date = 54
********************~*********************************************************************************
. I was informed by Wayne LeBlanc that the DNR will not be allowing the lake level to be
lowered in Peltier Lake in an attempt to provide an early eradication of eurasian milfoil.
The DNR was concerned about potential negative effects to the fish population and
communicated this concern via a letter to the Centerville Lake Association.
. We have posted vacancies for the economic development commission. Mary Capra will
be resigning in January due to her commitment to serve on City Council and John Magill
has submitted his resignation due to increasing duties from his work and family
commitments.
. The Hunter's Crossing bond was successfully closed this week. Thanks go to the County
Bank for purchasing the bonds for this project.
. I attended an informative trail's meeting at Bunker Hills Activity Center yesterday. Wayne
LeBlanc was also in attendance representing Centerville. Anoka County has amended
their master plan to incorporate a future trail connection across 1-35E near Clearwater
Creek. The funding will have to be obtained for a pedestrian bridge in this location. We
will attempt to tap into our legislative resources as we make a case for state funding for this
project.
. Ground Development has brought in a revised plat for their proposed subdivision to be
known as Pheasant Marsh. The public hearing is scheduled for next Tuesday at the
Planning and Zoning Committee.
. Truth in taxation hearing is scheduled for 12/4 at 6:00pm. Final levy amount needs to be
certified by the end of December.
12/1100
Page 2 on
* A new sign ordinance is nearing completion. A public hearing on this ordinance will
probably be scheduled for the January Planning and Zoning Committee meeting.
. There is currently about 5.5 inches of ice on Centerville Lake. If cold weather adds to
that total the Centerville Lion's are considering sponsoring the first ever youth ice fishing
contest this year. This item is being discussed at our next meeting.
* Enjoy your weekend!
12/1/00
- -.-
Page 1 of2
Jim March
To: WIR Subscribers
Subject: Week in Review
Week in Review
November 16. 2000
Building Permits this Period = 4
Building Permits YTD = 181
New Homes Year to Date = 50
*****AA~~AAAA****************AAAlAAl*AA~lllA************************AAllllAAA***~lll~1~AA**A1AA~lAllAA*******
. I'm hoping to use a vacation day tomorrow, so this edition of the week in review is being
sent out early.
* The house across the street from City Hall was removed this week. The property owner
is petitioning to have the property rezoned to commercial. I believe this would make a nice
addition to the limited commercial base that we have in the community.
* We received notice from the Minnesota Department of Employee Relations that the City
is in compliance with the Minnesota Pay Equity Act. The next report is due in January of
2003.
* I have received notice that Mady Reiter is resigning as the Centennial Lakes Police
Commission Chair due to her successful outcome in the recent election. I am sure the
police department is already in the process of recruiting a new commission chair.
* The planned unit development public hearing for the proposed Pheasant Marsh was held
on Tuesday. Several residents were in attendance to provide input to the planning and
zoning committee. The committee voted to make a recommendation to reject the PUD
based on the fact that the proposed plat did not contain the mandatory 20% of common
open space. The developer intends to resubmit a new plat that would conform to the City's
R2 standard of 15,000 square foot minimum lot sizes. This would cause them to lose
several lots from the previous submittal. The developer indicated at the meeting that they
would be willing to time their development so that new homes would not be occupied until
the new elementary school was built. If they reapply, there will be another public hearing at
the next planning and zoning committee meeting.
* The variance request for a larger sign for Schlavin Chiropractic was recommended for
denial. The planning and zoning committee is currently working to revise the sign
ordinance and they will be considering allowing larger home based businesss signs for
those businesses that are adjacent to County Roads. Their next workshop is scheduled for
11/16/00
next week Tuesday.
* The Council meeting is scheduled for next week on Monday evening. The meeting was
moved to avoid conflicts with Thanksgiving.
. The County plow just went by City Hall with the plow down and they are spreading salt.
Winter is officially here!
* Enjoy your weekend!
11/16/00