HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-11-14 P &Z Agenda
tervi[[e
Tstaflisfied 1857
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMITTEE
MEETING AGENDA
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000
6:30 p.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call
II. PUBLIC HEARING (S)
1. Schlavin Variance Request
2. Ground Development (Preliminary Plat-POO)
III. APPEARANCES
1. Mr. Roger Shimon - Zoning/Electrical Fencing
2. Mr. Terry Sager - Mini-Storage
IV. OLD BUSINESS
V. NEW BUSINESS
1. Schlavin Variance Request
2. Ground Development (Preliminary Plat-POO)
3. Ordinance #4 Amendments
VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS
VII. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
I. October 3, 2000 Meeting Minutes
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
Travel Trailers - A mobile vehicle with wheels, designed for overnight living or camping
purposes, capable of being towed by a motor vehicle.
Use, Permitted - A use that is permitted in the district under which it is listed.
Usable Open Space - A ground area on a lot, which is graded, developed, landscaped or
equipped or intended and maintained for recreation or leisure, available to and useable by
persons occupying a dwelling unit and their guests.
Variance - The waiving by Board action of the literal provisions of the Zoning Ordinance in
instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of
circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration.
Vehicle - Any vehicle which is self-propelled or designed to be pushed or pulled and shall
include, but not be limited to, automobile, busses, motorbikes, motorcycles, motor scooters,
trucks, tractors, go-carts, golf carts, campers, trailers, boats, planes and gliders.
Vehicle Abandoned - Any vehicle as defined in this section, which does not have lawfully
affixed or attached thereto an un-expired state registration or license plate or plates, or the
condition of which is wrecked, dismantled, partially dismantled, inoperative, abandoned or
discarded.
Water-Oriented Accessory Structure or Facility - A small above ground building or other
improvement except stairways, fences, docks, and retaining walls, which, because of the
relationship of its use to a surface water feature, reasonably needs to be located closer to
public waters than the normal structure setback. Examples of such structures and facilities
include boathouses, gazebos, screen houses, fish houses, pump houses, and detached
decks.
Wetland - Lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water table
is usually at or near the surface or the land or is covered by shallow water. For purposes of
this definition, wetlands must have the following three characteristics:
A. Predominance of hydric soils; and
B. Are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency
and duration sufficient to support a prevalence of hydrophytic
vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions; and
C. Under normal circumstances support a prevalence of such
vegetation.
Yard - A required open space on a lot which is unoccupied and unobstructed from the
ground upward, except as otherwise provided for herein. The measurement of a yard shall
be construed as the minimum horizontal distance between the lot line and the building line.
I
L
Page 13 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City ofCenterville Ord. #4
spaces and public and recreational facilities have been constructed and provided, he shall
forward this information to the City Council, which may revoke the PUD Permit.
Section 180-270: Maintenance of Common Open Space. All land shown on the Final
Development Plan as common open space must be conveyed to homeowners association
or similar organization for the maintenance of the planned development. The common
open space must be conveyed to the homeowners association or similar organization
subject to covenants to be approved by the City Council which restrict the common open
space to the uses specified on the final development plan, and which provide for the
maintenance of the common open space in a manner which assures its continuing use for
its intended purpose.
Section 180-280: Homeowners Association. If a homeowners association is created,
the applicant shall submit plans at the time of final plan of development and documents
which explain:
A. Ownership and membership requirements; and
B. Articles of incorporation and bylaws; and
C. Time at which the developer turns the association over to the
homeowners; and
D. Approximate monthly or yearly association fee for homeowners; and
E. Specific listing of items owned in common including such items as
roads, recreation facilities, parking common open space ground, and
utilities.
Division 185: Variances
Standards
The Planning Commission shall recommend a Variance and the Council shall order the
issuance of such Variance only if it conforms to the following standards:
A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the
land, structure, or building involved and do not result from the actions
of the petitioner; and
B. Literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive
the petitioner of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the
same district under the terms of this Ordinance; and
C. Granting the Variance requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands,
structures, or buildings in the same district; and
Page 55 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
D. The proposed Variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and
air to adjacent property, or unreasonably diminish or impair
established property values within the surrounding area, or in any
other respect impair the public health, safety, or welfare of the
residents of the city; and
E. Any person filing a petition requesting a variance or an amendment of
the Zoning Ordinance rezoning property or changing regulations within
any use district shall pay a fee according to the Schedule established
by resolution of the City Council. The fee is payable at the time of
filing a Petition and is not refundable.
Section 185-010: Board of Appeals and Adjustments. The Planning and Zoning
Commission shall act as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments and shall have the power
to hear and recommend requests for the following:
A. Interpretation: Hearing appeals where it is alleged that there is an
error in a decision or judgment made by an Administrative Officer in
the interpretation or enforcement of this Ordinance or in the
interpretation of Zoning District boundaries; and
B. Variances: Recommend variances from literal ordinance
requirements in instances where strict enforcement would cause
undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual
property under construction.
Section 185-020: Variance Procedures
A. Applications provided by the City must be completed in writing prior to
any consideration of Variance Petitions. Fees for Variances are
established by resolution of the City Council.
B. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments may require the applicant to
provide copies of plans, maps, surveys, etc., as deemed necessary, to
ensure proper review and consideration of variance petitions.
C. After filing an application, the City Clerk shall set a date for a public
hearing. Notice of the hearing shall be posted and published at least
ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing, and notice shall be
mailed to each property owner within three hundred fifty (350) feet of
the property to which the Variance relates. Defects in the notice or
failure to notify individual property owners shall not validate the
proceedings, provided a good faith effort was made to comply with
these provisions.
D. Upon the hearing request, the Board of Appeals and Adjustments
Page 56 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
shall either recommend approval or denial for the Variance and shall
state the reasons for said action. Conditions for approval may be
attached to any Variance granted.
E. Upon receipt of the recommendations ofthe Commission, the Council
shall hold whatever hearings it deems advisable and shall make its
decision upon the request to grant the variance. In granting the
Variance the Council may impose conditions which it considers
necessary to meet the standards of this ordinance and to protect the
best interests of the surrounding area and the city as a whole.
Violation of any such condition is a violation of this Ordinance. The
Board of Appeals and City Council must find true the following, in the
granting of a Variance from this Ordinance:
1. Granting a Variance will not adversely
affect the public health, welfare and safety
and will not be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the
neighborhood; and
2. Strict interpretation or enforcement would
result in a practical difficulty or
unnecessary hardship that is not self
created, that is inconsistent with the intent
of this Ordinance and the Comprehensive
Plan; and
3. There are exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions applicable to
the property, use or facilities that do not
apply generally to other properties in the
same district; and
3. There are exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions applicable to
the property, use or facilities that do not
apply generally to other properties in the
same district; and
4. Strict or literal interpretation would deprive
the applicant of the use and enjoyment of
his property in a manner similar to others
in the same district; and
Page 57 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City ofCenterville Ord. #4
5. Granting of the variance will not allow a
use which is otherwise not a permitted
use in the Zoning District in question.
F. A Variance granted but not used shall become void one (1) year after its
effective date.
G. No application for the same or essentially the same Variance shall be
made within six (6) months of the date of denial.
Section 185-030: Variance Appeal Procedures.
A. Within thirty (30) days of the action of the Board of Appeals and
Adjustments, the applicant or an affected property owner may file an
appeal to the City Council to the decision of the Board of Appeals and
Adjustments. The City Council shall set a date for a public hearing,
within forty-five (45) days of receipt of the appeal, to consider granting
or denying the variance request.
B. The City Council shall have the power and duty of hearing and
deciding appeals where it is alleged that there is an error in any order,
requirement, decision or determination made by the administrative
officer, enforcement officer, or by the Planning and Zoning
Commission in the administration or enforcement of this Ordinance.
C. Procedure. An appeal for Administrative Review may be taken to the
Council by any person, firm or corporation or any city officer,
department, or agency affected by an adverse decision in the
administration or enforcement of this Ordinance. Such an appeal
shall be taken by filing a Notice of Appeal specifying the grounds
thereof with the Zoning Administrator, and the Council within thirty
(30) days after the decision. If the Appeal is not taken by the owner of
the property which is the subject matter of the decision appealed from,
the Notice shall not be so filed until after it has been served upon such
owner either in person or by mail. The Zoning Administrator shall
forthwith transmit to the Council all papers constituting the record
upon which the action appealed from was taken. An Appeal for an
Administrative Review or a Variance stays all proceedings, including
criminal proceedings in furtherance of the action appealed from unless
the Zoning Administrator certifies to the Council that by reason of facts
stated in the certificate a stay would, in his opinion, cause imminent
peril to life or property. In that case the proceedings shall not be
stayed otherwise than by a restraining order granted by a court of
competent jurisdiction. The Council shall at its next regular meeting
after the filing of an Appeal to it from a decision of the board set a date
for hearing thereon, which shall be not later than sixty (60) days after
Page 58 of62
. .
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
the meeting. After hearing the oral or written views of all interested
persons, the Council shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a
specified future meeting thereof. The decision of the council may be
appealed to the County District Court.
Division 190: Interim Uses
Section 190-010: Purpose. In addition to the purposes stated in Section 2 of this
Ordinance, it is intended that the Interim Use Permit procedures allow flexibility in the use
of land or structures in the City, when such uses are not permanent and when such uses
meet appropriate conditions and performance standards that protect the public health,
safety and welfare.
Section 190-020: Application, Public Hearing, and Procedure. The application, public
hearing, notice and procedure requirements for Interim Use Permits shall be the same as
those for Amendments, as provided in Section 7.03 of this Ordinance. If a proposed interim
use is not listed as a permitted interim use in this Ordinance, a text amendment to this
Ordinance will be required before an Interim Use Permit may be considered.
Section 190-030: Termination. All Interim Use Permits shall terminate on the happening
of any of the following events, whichever first occurs:
A. The date stated on the permit.
B. Upon violation of the condition under which the permit was issued.
C. Upon change in the City's zoning regulations that renders the use
non-conforming.
Section 190-040: Standards. The Interim Use must be allowed in the Zoning District
where the property is located. The Interim Use must meet or exceed the performance
standards set forth in this Ordinance and other applicable City Ordinances. The interim use
must comply with the specific standards for the use identified in this Ordinance, and must
comply with all conditions of approval, which shall be included in an interim use permit
agreement.
Section 190-050: Conditions. The City may attach conditions to approval of a permit to
mitigate anticipated adverse impacts associated with the use, to ensure compliance with
the standards of approval, to protect the value of other property, and to achieve the goals
and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
Division 195: Amendments
A. Amendments to this ordinance may be initiated by the Planning and
Zoning Commission, City Council or by a petition of a landowner or
other interested party.
Page 59 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
ordinary high water mark is commonly that point where the natural vegetation changes from
predominantly aquatic to terrestrial.
Performance Standard - A criterion established to control appearance, noise, odor, toxic
or noxious matter, vibration, fire and explosive hazards, glare, heat, waste and other
potential impacts generated by or inherent in uses of land or buildings.
Planned Unit Development - A tract of land, which will contain two or more principal
structures, developed under unified ownership or control, the development of which may be
unique and of a substantially different character than that of the surrounding area.
Planning and Zoning Commission - The Planning Commission of the City of Centerville.
Plat - The drawing or map of a subdivision prepared for filing of record pursuant to Chapter
505 and containing all elements and requirements set forth in applicable local regulations
adopted pursuant to Section 462.358 and Chapter 505.
Portable Sign - Any sign not permanently attached to the ground or other permanent
structure, or a sign designed to be transported, including, but not limited to, signs designed
to be transported by means of wheels; signs converted to A- or T-frames; menu and
sandwich board signs; umbrellas used for advertising; and signs attached to or painted on
vehicles parked and visible from the public right of way, unless said vehicle is used in the
normal day-to-day operations of the business.
Principal Use or Principal Structure - The main use to which the premises are devoted
and the purpose for which the premises exist.
Private Property - Any real property within the City which is privately owned and which is
not a public property as defined in this section.
Public Hearing - An official public meeting, which notice has been published in the official
newspaper.
Public Property - Any street or highway that includes the entire width between the
boundary lines of every way publicly maintained for the purposes of vehicular travel, and
shall also mean any other publicly owned property or facility.
Recreational Use - Golf courses, tennis courts, driving ranges, archery ranges, picnic
grounds, boat launches ramps, swimming areas, parks, wildlife and nature preserves,
game farms, fish hatcheries, shooting preserves, target ranges, trap and skeet ranges,
hunting and fishing areas, hiking, bicycling and horseback riding trails.
Recreational Vehicles - A mobile vehicle, including boats, used for recreational purposes
capable of being towed or being self-propelled.
Residential Facility - A state licensed residential facility, defined by Chapter 462,
Page 10 of62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Oed, #4
include, but not be limited to, softball, football, volleyball, broomball,
ice or field hockey, tennis, basketball tournaments, or outdoor music
concerts; and
B. Such activities shall be considered a Special Use within all
Residential Districts of the City and shall require a permit therefore.
The City shall have the right to make provisions in such permit for
insuring public health and sanitation, traffic regulation, noise and litter
control and regulation on the number of events that may be
conducted on a specific site.
Division 180: Planned Unit DeveloDments (PUDs)
Section 180-010: Objectives. To help encourage a more creative approach to the use of
land, departures from the Centerville Zoning Ordinance may be granted by the City Council
in the form of Planned Unit Development Districts to achieve:
Subd. 1:
Subd. 2:
Subd. 3:
Subd. 4:
Subd. 5:
A maximum choice of living environments by allowing a
variety of housing building types and permitting an
increased density per acre and a reduction in lot
dimensions, yard, building setbacks, and area
requirements; and
A more useful pattern of open space and recreation
areas and, if permitted as part of the project, more
convenience in the location of accessory commercial
uses and services; and
A development pattern which preserves and utilizes
natural features, trees and other vegetation, and
prevents the disruption of natural drainage patterns; and
A more efficient use of land and a resulting substantial
savings through shorter utilities and streets; and
A development pattern in harmony with land use
density; transportation facilities, and community facilities
objectives of the comprehensive plan.
Section 180-020: General Requirements. A special use permit shall be required of all
Planned Unit Developments. The City may approve the PUD only if it finds the
development satisfies all the following standards:
Subd. 1:
The development shall be planned so that it is
consistent with the Centerville Comprehensive Plan;
and
Page 45 of 62
Effective 915100
City of CentervilIe Ord. #4
Subd. 2: The PUD is an effective and unified treatment of the
development possibilities on the project site and the
development plan provides for the preservation of
unique natural amenities such as streams, stream
banks, wooded cover, rough terrain, and similar areas;
and
Subd. 3: The planned unit development proposal appears to
harmonize with both existing and proposed
development in the area surrounding the project site;
and
Subd. 4: The tract of land shall be under unified control at the
time of application and scheduled to be developed as
one unit. In addition, the development plan must
include provisions for the preservation of natural
amenities; and
Subd. 5: Each phase of the proposed development, as it is
proposed to be completed, is of sufficient size,
composition, and arrangement that its construction,
marketing, and operation are feasible as a complete
unit, and that provision and construction of dwelling
units and common open space are balanced and
coordinated; and
Subd. 6: The PUD will not create an excessive burden on parks,
schools, streets, and other public facilities and utilities
which serve or are proposed to serve the district; and
Subd.7: The proposed total development is designed in such a
manner as to form a desirable and unified environment
within its own boundaries; and
Subd. 8: The plans required under this Section must be
submitted in a form which will satisfy the requirements
of Ordinance #8 for the preliminary and final plans; and
Subd. 9: Permission to develop specific parcels of land under the
provisions which follow shall be binding on all
construction. Any change in the development plan after
approval by the City Council shall be resubmitted for
consideration; and
Subd. 10: Subdivision review under the Subdivision Ordinance
shall be carried out simultaneously with the review of a
Page 46 of 62
L_ _ _ _
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
PUD under this section of the Zoning Ordinance.
Section 180-030: Uses Permitted. Permitted uses may include any combination of
dwelling units in single-family, two-family, town or row houses; any non-residential use to
the extent such non-residential use is designed and intended to serve the residents of the
planned unit development; public or private education facilities; or other uses permitted in
the Zoning District in which the planned unit development is located. When a PUD
proposes a mixture of residential uses with commercial uses, the Council may limit the
development of not more than ten percent (10%) of the tract to commercial uses.
Section 180-040: Relationship of PUD Site to Adjacent Areas. The design of a PUD
shall take into account the relationship of the site to the surrounding areas. The perimeter
of the PUD shall be so designed as to minimize undesirable impact of the PUD on adjacent
properties, and conversely, to minimize undesirable impact of adjacent land use and
development characteristics on the PUD.
Section 180-050: Minimum Size. A PUD shall consist of at least ten (10) acres.
Section 180-060: Minimum Lot Size. The minimum lot size requirements of other
sections of this Ordinance do not apply to a PUD except that the minimum lot size
requirements of the underlying zone shall serve as a general guideline to determine the
maximum dwelling unit density of the total development.
Section 180-070: Setback and Side Yard Requirements. Notwithstanding other
provisions of this article, setback and side yard requirements of lots in a PUD shall be at
least equivalent to the spacing requirements of buildings similarly developed under the
terms of this ordinance on separate parcels.
Section 180-080: Access to Public Right-of-Way. The site of a PUD shall abut, and the
major internal street or streets serving the PUD shall be connected to, at least one primary
arterial. or neighborhood collector street.
Section 180-090: Utility Requirements. Utilities, including telephone and electrical
systems, installed within a PUD shall be placed underground. Utility appurtenances, which
can be effectively screened, may be excepted from this requirement if the City finds that
such exception will be consistent with the objectives of this article and the character of the
proposed PUD.
Section 180-100: Open Space. A minimum of twenty percent (20%) of the gross land
area for private or public open air recreational use protected by covenants running with the
land or by conveyances or dedicated as the Planning and Zoning Commission may specify
shall be an integral part of the plan. Such Open Space areas shall not include land devoted
to streets, parking and private yards. Whenever possible, common Open Space shall be
linked to the Open Space areas of adjoining developments. Common Open Space shall be
of such size. shape, character, and locations as to be usable for its proposed purpose.
Page 47 of62
Effective 915100
City of Centerville Ord. #4
Section 180-110: Parking. Off-street parking and loading space shall be provided in each
PUD in the same ratios for types of buildings and uses as required in the underlying Zoning
District.
Section 180-120: Arrangement of Commercial Uses. When a PUD includes
commercial uses, commercial buildings shall be planned as groups having common parking
areas and common ingress and egress points. Each commercial area shall be separated
from abutting residential areas by appropriate screens or fences. The design of
commercial areas shall provide for the integrated and harmonious design of buildings and
for adequate and properly arranged facilities for internal traffic, circulation, landscaping, and
such other features and facilities as may be necessary to make the areas attractive and
efficient from the standpoint of adjacent non-commercial areas. Any area which is not to be
immediately improved or developed shall be landscaped or otherwise maintained in a neat
and orderly manner as specified by the City.
Section 180-130: Arrangement of Industrial Uses. In any PUD including industrial uses,
the industrial uses shall be provided in park-like surroundings utilizing landscaping and
existing woodlands as buffers to screen lighting, parking areas, loading areas and outdoor
storage of raw materials or products. An industrial area in a PUD shall provide for the
harmonious design of buildings and a compact grouping in order to economize in the
provisions of required utility services. Streets in a planned industrial area shall be kept to a
minimum in order to reduce traffic. All spaces between the right-of-way line and the
industrial building line and all intervening spaces between buildings, drives, parking areas,
and improved areas shall be landscaped with trees and plantings and properly maintained.
Section 180-140: Procedure.
Pre-Application Meeting. Before submitting a formal application for a PUD under 55.03,
the developer shall meet with the Planning and Zoning Commission. The purpose of this
meeting is to discuss early and informally the purpose and effect of this Ordinance and the
criteria and standards contained in this Ordinance and to familiarize the developer with the
City's Comprehensive Plan, including the land use plan, the major thoroughfare plan, and
the parks and Open Space plan, and with the subdivision regulations and the drainage,
sewer, and water systems of the City.
Section 180-150: Application. An application for approval of a Preliminary Development
Plan for a proposed PUD shall be made to the Planning and Zoning Commission, by at
least one owner or lessee of property for which the PUD is proposed. The application shall
be accompanied by a certified check or money order to cover the costs incurred in
checking and processing such plans in an amount affixed by resolution of the City Council.
The application with accompanying Outline Development Plan shall be submitted in twelve
(12) copies and shall include:
A. A vicinity map at a scale of one (1) inch equals two hundred fifty (250)
feet showing property lines, existing streets, existing zoning, and such
other items as the Planning and Zoning Commission may require to
Page 48 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
show the relationship of the proposed PUD to the Comprehensive
Plan of the City, to existing schools and other community facilities and
services, and to the surrounding area; and
B. A preliminary plan of the PUD in schematic form showing the
following:
1. The existing topographic character of the land;
and
2. A composite of all natural amenities of the site
including steep slopes, drainage ways plus
marshes, ponds and lakes; and
3. The size of site and proposed uses of the land to
be developed together with an identification of
off-site land use; and
4. The density of land use to be allocated to the
several parts of the development; and
5. The approximate location of thoroughfares; and
6. The location of common open space including
public schools, parks and playgrounds or private
natural preserves; and
7. The off-street parking system.
C. A written statement including the following:
1. A statement of the ownership of all land involved
in the PUD together with a summary of previous
work experience; and
2. An explanation of the general character of the
planned development; and
3. A statement describing the ultimate ownership
and maintenance of all parts of the development
including streets, structures and open spaces;
and
4. A statement describing how all necessary
governmental services will be provided to the
development; and
Page 49 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
5. The total anticipated population to occupy the
PUD, with breakdowns indicating the number of
school age children, adults and families.
D. The proposed schedule for the development of the site.
E. A statement setting forth the reasons why, in the opinion of the applicant,
the PUD will be in the publiC interest and consistent with the objectives
specified for PUDs by Section 51.
Section 180-160: Actions.
Subd. 1
Subd 2.
By Commission. Within sixty (60) days of the filing of the
application, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold a
Public Hearing on the proposed PUD following written and
published notice as required for amendments of the ordinance.
Following such hearing and within sixty (60) days of the filing
of the application or at a later time agreed to by the applicant,
the Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend
approval or disapproval of the preliminary proposal with such
changes and conditions as it may suggest and shall transmit its
recommendations to the City Council. In its recommendations
the Commission shall determine whether the proposed PUD is
consistent with the objectives for PUDs specified in Section 51
and with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan of the City; and
whether the benefits, combination of various land uses, if
proposed, and the inter-relationship with the land uses in the
surrounding area justify the deviation from standard district
regulations allowed by this ordinance for PUDs.
By Council. Upon receipt of the recommendations of the
Planning and Zoning Commission, the Council shall consider
the application and, after holding such public hearing as it
deems desirable, shall approve or disapprove the application
with such changes or conditions, it any, as it may deem
appropriate. Refusal of any changes or conditions shall
constitute denial of the plans by the City Council. Failure of the
land owner to notify the City Council of his acceptance or
refusal of the modification to the plan constitute acceptance of
these conditions. No Building Permits may be issued on land
within the PUD until final plans for the development have been
approved by the City Council under the procedures provided in
the following sections.
Section 180-170: PUD Agreement. The Zoning Administrator shall instruct the City
Attorney to draw up a PUD Agreement which stipulates the specific terms and conditions
Page 50 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
approved by the City Council and accepted by the applicant. This agreement shall be
signed by the Mayor of the City of Centerville, Clerk/Administrator and the applicant within
thirty (30) days of the City Council approval of the PUD application and final plat. Where
the PUD application and/or final plat is to be resubmitted or denied approval, the City
Council action shall be by written report setting forth the reasons for its actions.
Section 180-180: Final Review and Approval. An application for review and approval of
the final development plan shall be filed by the applicant with the Planning and Zoning
Commission within six months of the date on which approval of the preliminary plan was
given by the Council. If application for final approval is not made within the time required,
the proposal shall be considered abandoned unless an extension period is requested and
granted by the City Council.
Section 180-190: Documentation Required. The final application shall be
accompanied by the following supporting documentation:
A. A final plan of the PUD in schematic form including the following:
1. The street system, lot layout and off street
parking and loading plan; and
2. The use, height, bulk and approximate location
of buildings and other structures; and
2. Land areas to be conveyed, dedicated or
reserved for parks, parkways, playgrounds,
school sites, public buildings, and similar public
and semi-public uses; and
4. A site plan for each building site and common
open area, showing approximate location of
buildings, structures and improvements; and
5. Generalized elevations and perspectives of all
structures; and
6. A site grading plan indicating the direction of flow
of surface drainage and all easements necessary
for both ponding and runoff; and
7. Plans, profiles, and specifications for the
distribution of water, collection of sanitary waste
and storm water; and
8. A landscape plan indicating the location, size
and type of plant materials to be used; and
Page 51 of62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Cenlerville Ord. #4
9. Plans, profiles, typical sections and
specifications for proposed street improvements;
and
10. The density of land use to be allocated to the
several parts of the site being developed.
B. A written statement including:
1. The approximate date when construction will
begin by stage of development and the area of
open space to be provided at each stage; and
2. Agreements, provisions or covenants which
govern the use, maintenance and continued
protection of the development and any of its
common open areas; and
3. Other conditions specifically required by the
Commission and the Council for the particular
PUD.
Section 180-200: Action On Final Application. Procedure for action by the Planning
and Zoning Commission and the Council on an application for review and approval of the
final plan for a PUD shall be the same as prescribed by this article for the action on the
preliminary proposal. In giving approval, the Council may specify the length of time within
which construction of the project must be begun or be completed, and it may attach such
other conditions as seem necessary. The final development plan shall be in general
conformance with the preliminary development plan as approved.
A. Criteria for Approval. The findings necessary for approval of both
the preliminary and final development plans shall be based on the
following and describe in what respect the plan would or would not be
in the public interest.
1. The plan does not conflict with the Centerville
Comprehensive Plan.
2. The plan is designed to form a desirable and
unified development within its own boundaries.
3. The proposed uses will not be detrimental to
present and future land use in the surrounding
area.
4. Any exceptions to the standard requirements of
the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances are
Page 52 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Oed. #4
justified by the design of the development.
5. The plan will not create an excessive burden on
parks, schools, streets, and other public facilities
and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve
the PUD.
B. Non-Compliance. In the event the plan as submitted for final
approval is not in substantial compliance with the preliminary
development plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall notify
the applicant within forty-five (45) days of the date of application,
setting forth the ways in which the plan is not in substantial
compliance.
1. The applicant may treat such notification as
denial of preliminary approval; or
2. The applicant may re-file his plan so that it does
substantially comply with the outline
development plan; or
3. The applicant may file a written request with the
Planning and Zoning Commission that it hold a
public hearing on his request for final approval.
Any such hearing shall be held within thirty (30)
days after the request for such hearing. Within
forty-five (45) days of such hearing the Planning
and Zoning Commission shall either grant or
deny preliminary approval to the plan.
C. Final Approval. The City Council shall review and approve the Final
Development Plan if it is in substantial compliance with Preliminary
Development Plan. Following this, the applicant shall record the Final
Development Plan in the manner provided for recording subdivision
plats. If the Final Development Plan is not in substantial compliance,
the applicant shall be requested to repeat the procedures outlined for
the Preliminary Development Plan.
Section 180-210: Time Limit. If work on the PUD is not started within three months of the
proposed schedule date after final approval has been granted, approval shall termihate
unless an extension period is requested or granted by the City Council.
Section 180-220: Annual Review. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review all
PUD Districts within the City at least once each year and shall make a report to the City
Council on the status of the development in each of the PUD Districts. If the City Council
finds that development has not occurred within a reasonable time after the original
Page 53 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Ord. #4
approval, the City Council may instruct the Planning and Zoning Commission to initiate
rezoning to the original Zoning District by removing the PUD District from the Official Zoning
Map.
Section 180-230: Amendments. Amendments may be made in the approved final plan
when they are shown to be required by changes in conditions that have occurred since the
final plan was approved or by changes in the Development Policy of the City.
A. Minor changes in the location, sitting, and height of buildings and
structures may be authorized by the City Engineer if requested by
engineering or other unforeseen circumstances.
B. All other changes in use, rearrangement of lots, blocks, and open
space, must be authorized by the City Council under procedures
outlined for amendment ofthe Zoning Ordinance.
Section 180-240: Completion. Completion ofthe PUD shall be certified by the Planning
and Zoning Commission on the Final Development Plan. Thereafter, the use of land and
the construction, modification, or alteration of any buildings shall be governed by the
approved Final Development Plan. Changes may be authorized only under the procedures
provided below:
A. Minor extension, alterations or modifications of existing structures may
be authorized by the Planning and Zoning Commission if they are
consistent with the intent and purpose of the final plan and do not
increase the cube of any building or structure by more than ten (10)
percent; and
B. Changes in the use of common open space or the replacement of any
building substantially destroyed which exceeds the intent and
purposes of the Final Development Plan may be authorized only by
amendment to the final development.
Section 180-250: Site Improvements. At any time following the approval of a
Development Stage Plan by the City Council, the applicant may, pursuant to the
applicable codes of the City apply for, and the Zoning Administrator may issue,
grading permits for the area within the PUD for which Development Stage Plan
approval has been given.
Section 180-260: Construction. The construction and provisions of all the common open
spaces and public and recreational facilities which are shown on the Final Development
Plan must proceed at the same phase as the construction of dwelling units. At least once
every six (6) months following the approval of the Final Development Plan, the Zoning
Administrator shall review all of the Building Permits issued for the planned development
and examine the construction which has taken place on the site. If he/she shall find that
the rate of construction of dwelling units is greater then the rate at which common open
Page 54 of 62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Oed. #4
spaces and public and recreational facilities have been constructed and provided, he shall
forward this information to the City Council, which may revoke the PUD Permit.
Section 180-270: Maintenance of Common Open Space. All land shown on the Final
Development Plan as common open space must be conveyed to homeowners association
or similar organization for the maintenance of the planned development. The common
open space must be conveyed to the homeowners association or similar organization
subject to covenants to be approved by the City Council which restrict the common open
space to the uses specified on the final development plan, and which provide for the
maintenance of the common open space in a manner which assures its continuing use for
its intended purpose.
Section 180-280: Homeowners Association. If a homeowners association is created,
the applicant shall submit plans at the time of final plan of development and documents
which explain:
A. Ownership and membership requirements; and
B. Articles of incorporation and bylaws; and
C. Time at which the developer turns the association over to the
homeowners; and
D. Approximate monthly or yearly association fee for homeowners; and
E. Specific listing of items owned in common including such items as
roads, recreation facilities, parking common open space ground, and
utilities.
Division 185: Variances
Standards
The Planning Commission shall recommend a Variance and the Council shall order the
issuance of such Variance only if it conforms to the following standards:
A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the
land, structure, or building involved and do not result from the actions
of the petitioner; and
B. Literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive
the petitioner of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the
same district under the terms of this Ordinance; and
C. Granting the Variance requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands,
structures, or buildings in the same district; and
Page 55 of62
~
MEMO
DATE: September I, 2000
TO Planning Commission
FROM: Jim March
RE : Attached letter from Roger Shimon, 1751 Peltier Lake Drive
............................................................................
I met with the gentleman that wrote the attached letter on Friday morning. He is
concerned about an electric fence that exists on the north side ofhis property. His
property is adjacent to an approximate 14 acre parcel that is zoned R-I Rural Residential
and is owned by John and Sanna Buckbee.
Mr. Shimon plans to appear at the Planning Commission meeting. He would like to
address amending the zoning ordinance to include a buffer for this type offencing
between R-I and other residential districts. Mr. Shimon feels that he should not be
forced to construct a fence because his neighbor decides to put up an electric fence.
I spoke to Mr. John Buckbee in regards to this issue. Mr. Buckbee indicated that he
might have intentions to expand the pasture area for his horses on his own property. The
electric fence would be approximately 8' off of the property line.
The newly adopted Ordinance #4 allows electric and barb wired fencing only on property
zoned R-I Rural Residential. There is no n1entlon of a buffer zone or setb8.cks n~qt:.ired
for this type of fencing.
FAX
To, c...b.. ~ PIMnInt ComntItlM
'rom: Rager IlIlImon
..... 661-42N82S
...... 1
.... llf1JOO
....
.. 0nIin8n:e far Eiec:Iric FeI1C8S cc:
~ 1, 2000
l>aIr PIamiDa c.."...:.,"'"
I'm ~ tbi9 !elller to find cut what MI CIIIl do abcul eleclric faJCClI in c..m:mu.. It is my
uh'lto.lloudlll8 dldt a ~ is allowed 10 haw 8Jl eIecIlric fI:Dce in a TIII'Ill II'Cll but not in a
residarliaI 8RIII, wlrl1 no bu1fir 2lJIIC beIw;m tbcte 8R11S.
I'm lX~ a 5O-foct rille wbcre this sKuatim 0CC\In.
As !be JUi:s sIm:I at tI1is time, )'00 tan actually bal'e a Day Can! right up 10 an electric 1mce. Does this
make tlmItI
A1I<r an iodivDJal IIIOIIeS an el<r;tric feo:e 10 lDlll:e hlsIber ....... bigger. !Ibould the neigllboring
propa'ly llWIWI' baYe 10 put up II ti::occ at his ~ Whar doe! this do llr the wluc of dle
n...:~~<'lo "'-._1)
---......~..-_._-_.
W'1Ih lhc mauy ....,;,_.. "S in our cIly, shouIdI1't "'" have an onIb:lanco to protect our childrcn and
clonICllIic animals in !be City ot'Ccmrville?
Sine.tnJy.
Rqp E. SIUmm
175 I PelIier Lake Drive
CentlnilIe, MN 55038
651-i07-9434
L
MEMO
DATE: November 9, 2000
TO Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Jim March
RE : Mini-storage
............................................................................
Terry Sager, owner of Sager's liquor has asked fur permission to address the Planning
and Zoning Commission in regards to the possibility of constructing mini.storage units
somewhere in the Industrial Park. I infurmed Mr. Sager that this request bad been denied
by previous Councils. This will be a discussion item only.
-tervi{{e
'Estafi[isfid 1857
1880 :Main Street . Centerviife, 9b{ 55038
(651) 429-3232 . :JfV((651} 429-8629
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
NOTICE OF VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CENTERVILLE
PLANNING & ZONING COMMITTEE
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Centerville Planning and Zoning Committee will
hold a public hearing and may take action on the following matter:
ITEM:
PETITIONER:
PROPERTY I.D. #:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Variance
Schlavin Family Chiropractic
R23-31-22-13-0014
LOT/UNIT 2, BLK/TRACT I
PETERSONS 2ND ADDITION
ADDRESS:
1862 Main Street
The petitioner requests that the Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission consider
granting a variance for the above-mentioned property. The variance is to allow a sign to
be placed on the property exceeding signage requirements contained in Ordinance #4
regulating size, height and containing a time and temperature display. Said sign will
consist of a two (2) pillar structure, double faced, four (4) feet by six (6) feet or a three
(3) pillar structure, single faced, four (4) feet by six (6) feet. Specific design of sign age is
dependent upon required placement. The said hearing will take place on Tuesday,
November 14, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street in the Council
Chambers beginning at 6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter.
City Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assisted devices or a sign language
interpreter must be received before 4:00 p.m., November 1,2000. All persons interested
are invited to attend and to be heard orally or in writing. You may contact the City
Clerk's office at (651) 429-3232 or by facsimile (651) 429-8629 if you need additional
information.
October 17, 2000
/s/ Teresa Bender
ClerklTreasurer
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
Published in the Quad Community Press October 24 and October 31, 2000
~ -~ --
~Jm.~I"I"I~~1~:[1~1!I'_~'~:~ ::~
'f' .... \' . ~ . . ~ .. ~
~/]~'r-I;Jl.t!"'''' F" "','''', '. I ~ ~ ~ ,1O~
1 I ~~O.i .. D f 2 ;S I .. III . 1 ~ r:- s ~
L 1. . 1. 1 ".2.. ,/~\ .,t 0 ~I . ~ 10 ..:~"
1 1 , · r 7,,,,~~\
' ~- I,~, 1_ '. y~ '7 .
I.M, ., '" a.t'E ~ r--.. . '1 ~ ~ ,... ,_ ,
PRt,IP'E ~ I :&....- 0\ tf4& ~
.;. ...... - ,... ,,,,,... 117 · ii p." 0 1 OL' o.'~ "
,.a a;"r3 4 s '~ 12 11 10 18>~ p'-I
'i:; " ..J ~ · "/ ~ ' C't. ",oTro . r1fILL <;'. I. '
,";; '" 10 ~'IO 2" 2 II,r\ ._;' ,.n
'S '4 I I~ /' aD. MeIIm[ t: Id ,..'OI04J ,...,
,'" 15 ,O\C!~"- /t1~ 14 ~ ~ 10M f~.
'^ If ~12 .p ~ ,...,...,...'..._......~/{;'Jir"..."
<:;~ 1.\' 11 ,.~I ..~It71 .~, 2r..A7li'~T.7.D ."
~'" ' .-:- \',~ ~I ':'1.::'1.." I 'I
t~ ~ ~ " 7 e. fO~' I
17 ~ rtiiUI fjj; , PARK "-.6!l'" ~
~ !~~ tol"'l":',.l';v~ ~'7' 1 ~ ~' :"" '~\ ';~"".
~ 1;~7 ~ 1\ fl-(') 2 ~ ~ 2 '~I ~2 <;i ~iC:- ~7' rYt/
,;c. .....:. " '~!~." ~ C: :" , :~i~'
I 1 T"'" 1'83!1 ~ ~i~~S ..;! 4~~) ~/K. 012: 'r 18f ~'r'I'~ I
81.o81'lauleal32l~'7 ~ l=. 7 I - 'r1,1ir
, , 21' ".',h. ~. f.t:;. ~ (,.. j' L . ~ .h'U; . '
3 {f ',I I. ., ' ~ r" t 13 F 71&+I!~ J;: 11~'rl:-7B ~Ir; I
~1 17 ~tJ/K';" -;. EO;} .~! · ~ 2'c'~"~ 7 . to ;..-'20 RO'l"Al I
& ,,'''> --..!'. ~ '" " 7 ,.....,,, "d' PARK V'rT or 'f ~
~ -.~.. I.~ E--' 7~, ,~ .r... CO .J I
~- 11 ! ~ J;; ~ tJ "'-~ ; r: ~~
~ ~! 11 ~ ,13 12 11 ~ 10 E:: -:::-'f:: SiJ 10 ~ ~ I
~ ~~ ~ 11 · ~ 5~ ~~t7
~~. /<''<./"'u .. ~,::",: ~~' ~
2~ 21 22 23 2... U ~
t? g ~ ...
aUf. 1 2 's 3, ,- I:;! 11 . ~ ~ 13~.os "
JAj"'~ o'AL: 1 ,n:~ t A,O J
'COI~1 2,,),1"" rfJ"b.. ,I' ,I,,,,
,_CAD01 ()li,_ lY;n~H ~.:. , . ~ ,_ \07.1 1,,,, [",
-
;c 2fl,~'~f~Mj,~~~"3'
111 I ._
- = 2 I \
3 .. G~' t. 15 1115
7 e1744 ~, ~ , tJ 1 12 -'o/j
, .
H,lt 3,. ~(( ?~ .~ ':" to ~vS'
'".:" :,,, ~ _ '"' ..,~' A · ~ '::\':,,:~ 23 ..
11 ..,,-~....... 7lMJ .. ,..,..:.>
1 ""'~.... ''''1 t ",,,,,,
Q:; ",,1':1 11 jW" ,."..... '"
)..1' (, 1""1'" 14 <:>
li/"3 ~'W r~ -1" 13\~. ~ '"
C"~'<:'I; 3i\ ;nlf ~tt~ I! ~ J to \7 # ,~
-e!'''' r- /I~~~#
, "' 1\ . ,:. 3,/~.~"" ....., <f:q.,.-. 4..~\ ~ ~IGiiJ u.GLEmAlL ..;.!I!20
B .....;;(,:.t''' ~ i\...._ 2 ! 10 1.
:ili" 221 ·
--; lID 4
~ "I. ~ OU1t.OT
7 ~ .... II 2 ,'.24/ ~t2 rfi$ '-' .r m " f/"'6f'..~n A
""'" "J: I ""~ ~ 1 2b" J%..S'f'"
.;:. )~ '.,,", )i'l.o" --'.' /' i~"
, j .6. ~~. DQ..E '" ll!i ,"" .<.::'....' " 10
'91J"'~i"/ 1
"".r)'t!.~/ -(27, PNlK
d- " ._
II . I " ~~ 7 I 0 11. I " I" I 12 OJ I " I " I .. I "I I ~ 1 '" . I ,. / ,\ \,,' '" , '" I ""; I I
~." ~l'~'
'NO. /'\V,"\; rI'2 ~
a 7.251 . < 'v I I> F
'ON '7,' ~
/ \') "'" ""I. 22 ~ ~
U ~ ~ S
~.. ,,"/ Ii......, -.!
/!J;-<$...~ ~
to t:I
I ~J 25 ~
~17 P ,;-- ~
, ? c--J,1.kl~ 27 I ~
2. / 15 ,'l' r SlLva. LAN!:
'--l' ~.\-')~ ,no ''''
, JI':'-!als'i'<>
7 \...JIO ~ f'
\ I t2 8:: 1\~ ~ ~
\ \ "~....l~., .
'\\ ....... ~ . ~
l . ~ 7
'tr -: :~ 'f:' I ~
I .!( Ik .
15".,~4..... ~
fi
6
AR\ \
7
_\J')
W
->. >--
~!Z
(;;~
~~
~ l,ll
<j
'"
<r)
-
,
.1.
. I
, ~
.
~
10 I'
h
"-II".
7"'"
.. ';;; ,m \
.....
~'-Ql~
~
~
,-
...t
,
. lV70 1...,
20 ~ .~ '
2
i \O~ ~. _
~ ,~.~ ~ '"
~ :'ivV~I~"'. ~'
"";\}'. ~I'i'~ r\
>;' 1 {\
~,\~S~%~~~i/
).'- ~~ ~-X.
l{i' '" '$~ ..-
21 12 f1
22
~ ~ ....1',
i ~~ '-
~ 27 ~FS"
,.,'
~ .. '" 2
.(,.,
.
-,
o
,-
2
.
>
,
,
,...~
1 ~ ~
1..l ,)..t.
~~1~
*
~
~
i
~
~
l"~'
...~'2
'7 la 13
"121...1 ,.,
,
p.. 3
I
MrMrs FirstName LastName Addressl City State PostalCode
Ms. Susan Rehbein or 7067 CenterviBe MN 55038
Current Brian
Owner Drive
Mr. & Desmond Englund or 7081 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Brian
Owner Drive
Mr.& Roger Edgett 7087 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Brian
Drive
Mr.& John Herdina or 7095 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Brian
Owner Drive
Mr. & Scott Tuominen or 7111 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Brian
Owner Drive
Mr.& Scott Messer or 7026 CenterviBe MN 55038
Mrs. Current Eagle
Owner Trail
Mr. & John Korth or 7028 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Eagle
Owner Trail
MacMay Homes or Current 7032 CenterviBe MN 55038
Owner Eagle
Trail
Mr.& Daniel Heitzman or 7034 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Eagle
Owner Trail
Mr. & Douglas Strom or 7038 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Eagle
Owner Trail
Mr. & Brian Hendren or 7039 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Eagle
Owner Trail
Mr. & Matthew Stien or 7040 CenterviBe MN 55038
Mrs. Current Eagle
Owner Trail
Mr. & Richard Terway or 7042 CenterviBe MN 55038
Mrs. Current Eagle
Owner Trail
Mr. & Steven Matson or 7044 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Eagle
Owner Trail
Mr.& Douglas Porter or 7046 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Eagle
Owner Trail
Ms. Julie Carlson or 7049 CenterviBe MN 55038
Current Eagle
Owner Trail
Mr.& Alex Hamemick 7050 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. or Current Eagle
Owner Trail
Ms. Doreen Reinhardt or 7052 Centerville MN 55038
Current Eagle
Owner Trail
Current Owner 1850 Centerville MN 55038
MrMrs FirstN ame LastName Address! City State PostalCode
Houle
Circle
Mr. & David West of 1824 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Main
Owner Street
Current Owner 1825 Centerville MN 55038
Main
Street
Mr.& Richard Robischon 1832 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. or Current Main
Owner Street
Mr.& Dean Lauderbaugh 1844 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. or Current Main
Owner Street
Drilling & or Current 1845 Centerville MN 55038
Tirokomos Owner Main
Street
Current Owner 1849 Centerville MN 55038
Main
Street
Current Owner 1851 Centerville MN 55038
Main
Street
Current Owner 1853 Centerville MN 55038
Main
Street
Current Owner 1855 Centerville MN 55038
Main
Street
Current Owner 1857 Centerville MN 55038
Main
Street
Mr. & Loren Clobes or 1858 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Main
Owner Street
Current Owner 1859 Centerville MN 55038
Main
Street
Mr.& Tom Schlavin 1862 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Main
Street
Current Owner 1863 Centerville MN 55038
Main
Street
Mr. & Hubert Olinger 1873 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Main
Street
City of Centerville 1880 Centerville MN 55038
Main
Street
Mr.& Bruce Luikart or 7130 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Peterson
Owner Trail
Mr.& Mark Spehar or 7138 Centerville MN 55038
Mrs. Current Peterson
tervi[[e
1880 Main Street . Centervilfe, M'J,[ 55038
'Esta6[isfiet{ 1857 CITY OF CENTERVILLE (651) 429-3232 . 'F~ (651) 429-8629
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE OR REZONING
tk-lt(,609
~-#$J7
FEE: /15.'~ +
Any additional costs incurred for
engineering1 legal fees, publication or
other requirements
VARIANCE: --.L
SIZE OF PARCEL(S):
PROPERTY OWNER: 10""' c;"I--,\r'Vd\ PHONE#: 4)/.0- O.J ~1
FEE OWNER:
ADDRESS: \ f{,,;}
,
Mill"'"
fffU,.-f
I
('/~+uu;Il(..
tlAN >Stl]~
APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY:
FEE OWNER
LEASE HOLDER
CONTRACT PURCHASER )
OPTION TO PURCHASE~4-.z p.lk.JS
- 8'-Hurdou.bL<- -fi:t&d 4x& ox:.
-r;w S'~'f1G.('Q{~~-4)({'
01 /(...4 . n '" . C'1~~(3p[l/~)
---- -- ---
~----~-
~d. Tt'^I'-"'""- diSflc~
,/
--
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
SiJ"
De. <; '7'"
p "-T
of!
'\1' ..
,
~r
will
REASON FOR REQUEST:
I have read the attached Ordinance #4, Page 13 "Variance", Pages 55-62, Division 185: Variances,
Section 185-010: Board of Appeals and Adjustments, Section 185-020: Variance Procedures, and
Section 185-030: Variance Appeal Procedures. I was also presented with that Section of Ordinance #4
that I may/may not be in compliance with and fully understand that if I am denied the ramifications of
same.
By paying the above stated fee, I understand that no refunds will be issued in full or in part, at any time,
even if the outcome is denial.
r-J----- d~
Signature of Applicant
~d~'
Signature of Property Owner
10 -)),-bD
Date
Schlavin Family
CHIROPRACTIC
(651) 653-6699
2... RDw\s 0+ to it
C,~IiG-eI-\BLE LE:--rrER-S {eox doF (00)
l-E S S
Zc:: "'" ~
, ..J LJ
I.\:"- . Si'~61\~ -ffl~E
4; x (, i dDbbl t -fQct:d
MG''\Gi\lt8\.+ b\ 61\)
Effective 9/5/00
City of CentervilJe Ord. #4
Section 105-020: Electric and Barbed Wire Fence. Electric fences, hog wire fencing,
barbed wire fencing, and similar fencing will not be allowed except in the R-1 District.
Section105-D30: Visual Obstructions. No fence may be erected which creates visual
obstructions at any intersection, alley, driveway or street for safe vehicular, bicycle or
pedestrian movement.
Section 105-D40: Swimming Pool Fencing. No private swimming pool with a water
depth exceeding twenty-four (24) inches may be allowed unless enclosed by a
permanent wall or fence not less than six (6) feet in height with self-closing door and
self-closing latch.
Division 110: Sign Reaulations
Section 110-010: General Provisions.
A. Signs are prohibited within the public right-of-way or easements
except that the City Council may grant a Special Use Permit to locate
signs and decorations on or within the right-of-way for a specified
time.
B. Flashing signs, motion signs or similar devices shall be prohibited in
all districts, except approved traffic signal devices.
C. Interior illuminated signs are permitted in all districts except
Residential. All illuminated signs shall have a shielded light source.
D. Business signs shall not be painted, attached, or in any manner
affixed to trees, rocks or similar natural surfaces. No signs of any type
shall be painted directly on to the roof or the sides of a building.
E. Signs which interfere with the ability of vehicle operators or
pedestrians to see traffic signals, or which impede the vision of traffic
by vehicle operators or pedestrians are prohibited.
F. Wall signs must be mounted to the wall in a plane parallel to the wall
and not perpendicular or projecting from the wall.
G. Signs shall not project above the rootline of any structure without the
issuance of a Special Use Permit.
H. No sign shall physically obstruct any window, fire escape or opening
intended to provide entry or exit to any structure or building or public
way.
I. All signs and sign structures shall be properly maintained in a safe,
Page 31 of62
Effective 9/5/00
City of Centerville Oed. #4
orderly condition at all times, including the replacement of defective
parts, cleaning and other items required for the maintenance of the
sign. Vegetation around, in front of, behind, and underneath the base
of ground signs for a distance of ten (10) feet shall be neatly
trimmed and free of weeds, and no rubbish or debris that would
constitute a fire or health hazard shall be permitted under or near the
sign.
J. No signs may be placed on utility poles in the community.
K. There may be no more than one identical sign per lot in a residentially
zoned area.
Section 110-020: Permitted Signs.
A. Campaign signs posted by bona fide candidates for political office or
by a person or group promoting a political issue for a candidate may
be placed in any district subject to the requirements of the district.
Campaign signs may be posted for a period not to exceed sixty (60)
days and shall be removed within seven days following the date of
the election. Only one sign per candidate will be allowed per lot.
B. Temporary banners and pennants employed for grand opening of
business establishments, special events and holidays shall be
removed within fourteen (14) days after such an opening, event or
holiday. Banners or pennants which are an integral part of the design
or architecture of a building are permitted.
C. One temporary identification sign, setting forth the name of the
project, architect, engineers, contractors, planners and financing
agencies, may be installed at a construction site in any district for the
period of construction. The sign area of a temporary identification
sign shall not exceed thirty-five (35) square feet.
D. In any district, one temporary real estate sign may be erected for the
purpose of advertising the lease or sale of property upon which it is
placed. Only one such sign shall be permitted per street frontage.
Such sign shall be removed within seven (7) days following lease or
sale.
E. Open house or other temporary signs that are placed and removed on
the same day.
Page 32 of 62
. .
Effective 9/5100
City of Centerville Ord. #4
The maximum size of such signs for each district is as follows:
Residential Districts 8
Agriculture and Public/lnstitutional Districts 8
Commercial/Industrial Districts 8
Ten (10) square feet
Twenty-five (25) square feet
Thirty-two (32) square feet
Section 110-030: Portable Signs. Portable signs are prohibited in residential districts.
Portable signs in all other Districts are allowed with permit as specifically authorized
below. Portable signs used for the purpose of directing the public will be permitted
subject to the following conditions:
A. Said sign is coincidental to or used in conjunction with a public
function; and
8. Said sign is used for a special business promotion or event; and
C. The period of use for such a sign shall not exceed fourteen (14)
consecutive days; and
D. No business may have more than six (6) special promotions or events
per year; and
E. Portable signs may not exceed eighty (80) square feet.
Section 110-040: Comprehensive Sign Plan Required. A Comprehensive Sign Plan
is required at the time of Planning and Zoning Commission review of any proposed
commercial or industrial development. Said plan shall indicate the location, size, height,
color, lighting and orientation of all proposed signs and shall be submitted for approval
pursuant to the regulations of the City of Centerville.
A. The following signs are permitted in the Residential and
Public/Institutional Districts:
1. Name Plate Signs: One (1) sign not to exceed
two (2) square feet in area for each Single-
Family, detached, dwelling or six (6) square feet
in area for each Multiple-family and
Public/Institutional building. Said nameplate
shall indicate only name and address.; and
2. Public, Institutional, and Recreational Signs:
One sign or bulletin board per street frontage for
each permitted use in said district, provided said
sign shall not exceed fifty (50) square feet in
area and shall be placed outside of the street
right-of-way with the exception of the center
Page 33 of 62
. .
Effective 915100
City of Centerville Ord. #4
island and shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in
height; and
2. Area Identification Sign: One (1) sign not to
exceed twenty-four (24) square feet in area for
each planned residential district entrance,
provided said sign is not placed within any street
right-of-way and does not exceed ten (10) feet in
height.
B. The following signs are permitted in the Commercial and Industrial
Districts:
1. Wall Signs: Wall signs are permitted on each
public street exposure or publiC parking exposure
provided said signage does not exceed ten
percent (10%) of said wall area; and
2. Free Standing Signs: One (1) free standing
sign per street frontage provided, however, said
sign does not exceed eighty (80) square feet in
area and twenty (20) feet in height; and
3. Area Identification Signs: One (1) area
identification sign is permitted per street frontage
per commercial or industrial development
provided, however, said sign does not exceed
sixty-four (64) square feet in area and twenty
(20) feet in height, and is not placed within ten
(10) feet of any street right-of-way.
Division 115: Heiaht
Section 115-010: Dwellings. No dwelling or other building may be erected to a height
exceeding thirty-five (35) feet without the issuance of a Special Use Permit.
Section 115-020: Excess Height on a Permit. Upon the securing of a Special Use
Permit any building may be erected to a height exceeding that specified for the
respective district providing:
A. The front, rear and side yards shall be increased one (1 ) foot for each
one (1) foot by which the building exceeds the height limit established
for such district; and
B. The structure is any of the following: television and radio towers,
church spires, belfries, monuments, tanks, water and fire towers, grain
Page 34 of 62
MEMO
DATE: November 9, 2000
TO : Planning and Zoning Connnission
FROM: Jim March
~ :lliooodD~cl~m~Pre~P~
............................................................................
Staff is working to complete the pre~ plat review checklist for this proposed
subdivision. I am expecting some residents to appear at the meeting to discuss delaying
this proposed subdivision. Cooocil discussed with the City Attorney requirements for a
possible residential moratorium. Apparently, the school district administration is going
to provide some information in regards to school capacity issues and future residential
growth. I am not sure how the timing of the approval for the school referendum will
affect the schools ability to provide services.
The pre~ plat is in the hands of the City Engineer, Building Official and
Centennial Fire Chief. We have not received written comments at the time of packet
preparation due to the short work week.
,
tervi[[e
'Establisfmf 1857
1880 :Main Street . Centemiffe, :M:Af.. 55038
(651) 429-3232 . rwc (651) 429-8629
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City
of Centerville will consider a preliminary plat request submitted by Ground
Development. The meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, November 14,2000 at 6:30 p.m. or
shortly thereafter. The purpose of the meeting is to hear all parties present regarding the
possibility of approving a preliminary plat for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the
area legally described as follows:
Parcel Identification Number R23- 31-22-34-000 I and
Parcel Identification Number R23- 31-22-43-000 I
Southeast Quarter (SE Y..) of the Southwest Quarter (SW Y..), and the North Half
(N 11,) of the Southwest Quarter (SW Y..) of the Southeast Quarter (SE Y..), all in
Section 23, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, except the South
528.64 feet of the North 578.64 feet of the West 445 feel of the Southeast Quarter
(SE Y..) of the Southwest Quarter (SW Y..), Section 23, Township 31 North, Range
22 West, Anoka County, Minnesota, subject to County State Aid Highway #21
and any easements of records.
The City Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assisted devices or a sign
language interpreter must be received before 4:00 p.m. November 10, 2000. All persons
interested are invited to attend and to be heard, orally or in writing. You may call City
Hall (651) 429-3234 if you have any questions.
October 26, 2000
/s/ Teresa Bender, Clerk/Treasurer
abcdefghijklnrnopqrstuvwxyz
Published in the Quad Community Press October 31, 2000 and November 7, 2000
-HERITAGE
,... .... I ~
L_l
;E~ 36
/' !
- \
..
- 2',: ~
-
'...
"
i
'--
-
~
:
-
!
,.~- 01' (;)"""",, ~~':', 1~-;1~\;".. \';"'I,':~>o.." .. ---;
jfl.----<::. l " , 'o~~-:!1, .
li'..~,. " , . 'lG" ~. -
<s:: " . , ,',. " T''" ,,,, ~o<;\ ~.. '
,).,.: I .... ( '(' - :/ ' \ 15 i1 ~~
,;:'^""X, 8"''':<1 GA,~lE'''; !{('."~ :i~'. ~nj' W Ii; ::\~ )1 ~ '
"r'''. -' 0" "-~ \~ ~~ .
~ "["f ~. ((:I ~'~fli! ~,/l'i~EEFl r~~\€V ~
.I 1 \ o_J J!.. W1U>' /', _ 4~.~\", Ill, Il " ('t~
t 1.).5 6 !,\.f/k~~ ,"- ~ -V,;p~l.U nn
''rIm' "" ',,,,. 'r.': ~ ~ :-'" "~~ '$.~ . . z,/~ j; ~~\.\.Wi!JE'-< 'Ill"L
;:,)t;~. .j\:. ~. ~~~'j~
~'~. 7' ,,2 ..! g -Vlil.,:i '.,
;'6 """ '" :~' '" : i- .. ' 'lO~ cP'r....~,i 07'-'
~ . 1a1' ,I; '~ -t!/" EA~
t2-'~~t61 ('071 697.1 ~t:.~ ~ 1:(' /' ;J'tIt~ 1
/ ~i'" " If./, i .i"I..l"..." 27 PARK 11..::"-1
I!" 1P!::1
I ,,~..' .~'/: (S.' ,,'
, .~V ~ .".
-, ,\15
> 7\J ~> "'.~'?< /,,'
5 ':~ j7~1
,
CEH1Dt./ ,'-,
1e.5a le11 1874 1M2 \~...f.,~:'l ;
2. 3 .. SO;.. CllJMT \
... : "
SlREET
1716'724
7.0 17"" 1148
11
12
l'
i
.
, .
~
~
~
.
~
A
,
: I 2' ~ .. , I 1'7 e 1, 10 I"
~... N 17M 1'713 1m I~ 17'1'1 174$1\153 1'7~ 17l1O 1717 1
IS
d CENlER Snm:T
; '';' ''";: · \"" ";, '; ,,.. "c/~7fi ~~ '7 '"; g " '";; ":0 ~
~ ~ ~ · (~~jv ; t. ." " "j "t "i/ t. > I ~ ~ ~" ^'! i ,~.
'?"~~.~ .:p.. " 7)..,;Vlz:'o ': ,...
/"' I "'- ! ! ._.___ i ...1A , /3' , ." 4! '
,- ~~.
"
"
1_ ,-,
1. 17
1825 I ,...~ 1841
"
"
r
I
~
:
)/
/
i
.
:
,,/
-i'/
"
i
i
I
MrMrs FirstName LastName Address! City State PostalCode
Mr. Walter Pracher or 6756 Centerville MN 55038
Current Centerville
Owner Road
Mr. & Mrs. Robert Koran or 6759 Centerville MN 55038
Current Centerville
Owner Road
Current Owner 6805 Centerville MN 55038
CenterviUe
Road
Mr. Thomas Wilharber or 6849 Centerville MN 55038
Current Centerville
Owner Road
Mr. Dennis Zerwas or 6882 CenterviUe MN 55038
Current Centerville
Owner Road
Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Vanderbeek 6892 Centerville MN 55038
or Current Centerville
Owner Road
Mr. Charles Baumann or 6903 Centerville MN 55038
Current Centerville
Owner Road
Mr. & Mrs. John Lundblad or 6904 Centerville MN 55038
Current Centerville
Owner Road
Mr. Werner Schoeberlein 6906 Centerville MN 55038
or Current Centerville
Owner Road
Mr. & Mrs. Larry Woiak or 6925 Centerville MN 55038
Current Centerville
Owner Road
Mr. & Mrs. Dale Greenwaldt 4697 - Stacy MN 55038
or Current 3 16th
Owner Lane
Mr. & Mrs. Michael Predmore or 1704 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Gary Will or 1705 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Philip Schweiger or 1708 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Steven Sather or 1713 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
l
MrMrs FirstName LastName Address! City State PostalCode
Mr. Robert Olson or 1721 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Randall Peterson or 1729 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. Steven Hulbach or 1736 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Jeffrey Daas or 1737 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Jeffery Haider or 1744 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. William Campbell or 1745 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Mark Gerszewski 1752 Centerville MN 55038
or Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Mark Plombon or 1753 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Robert Intihar or 1760 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. Daniel Kupfer or 1761 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. John Marten or 1768 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Steven Dixon or 1769 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Ms. Corrine Zerwas or 1776 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Gene Lewis or 1777 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. Scott & Ms. Lynn 1785 Centerville MN 55038
Munson Wright or Center
Current Street
MrMrs FirstName LastName Address! City State PostalCode
Owner
Mr. & Mrs. Orville Hughes or 1793 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Karl Solberg or 1800 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Ms. Jane & Mr. Dennis 1801 Centerville MN 55038
Hobscheid Olson or Center
Current Street
Owner
Mr. & Mrs. Dennis Countryman 1808 Centerville MN 55038
or Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Murray Wilke or 1809 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. David Dixon or 1817 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Ms. Cynthia & Ms. Ulshafer or 1825 Centerville MN 55038
Wendy Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. Sean P.A. Evans or Current 1832 Centerville MN 55038
Zwicki & Owner Center
Street
M. & J.L. Post or Current 1833 Centerville MN 55038
Schoonover Owner Center
Street
Ms. Saundra Gossman or 1840 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Keith Okan or 1841 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Clifford Lutz or 1850 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Steven Andert or 1858 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Ms. Leann Lindgren or 1859 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Dary Doten or 1866 Centerville MN 55038
L _
MrMrs FirstName LastName Addressl City State PostalCode
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Douglas Blum or 1874 CenterviIle MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Brian Clancy or 1882 CenterviIle MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Timothy Peloquin or 1889 CenterviIle MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Walter Mehsikhomer 1890 CenterviIle MN 55038
or Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Theis or 1901 CenterviIle MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Craig Curtis or 1902 CenterviIle MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Mark Bader or 1909 CenterviIle MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
M.T. Hunter & AJ. Hoffman 1917 CenterviIle MN 55038
or Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Larry Sailor or 1925 CenterviIle MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. Daniel Arcand or 1933 CenterviIle MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Ms. Jill & Mr. Mark 1934 CenterviIle MN 55038
Branson Olson or Center
Current Street
Owner
PJ. & R.R. Reid or 1941 CenterviIle MN 55038
Shaughnessy Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Blaine Hopp or 1949 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Brian Hanson or 1950 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
L
MrMrs FirstName LastName Address! City State PostalCode
Mr. & Mrs. David Grafsky or 1957 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Wayne Rodriquez or 1960 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Hanson or 1965 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. & Mrs. Robert Schaefer or 1970 Centerville MN 55038
Current Center
Owner Street
Mr. Rick Carlson 7671 Fridley MN 55432
(Hunter's Central
Crossing Avenue
Development) N.E.
Mr. Rudy Garcia or 6932 Centerville MN 55038
Current Durpe
Owner Road
Mr. & Mrs. Kerry Knockel or 6942 Centerville MN 55038
Current Dupre
Owner Road
Ms. Julie Erickson or 6948 Centerville MN 55038
Current Dupre
Owner Road
Mr. & Mrs. Frederick Curran or 6907 Oak Centerville MN 55038
Current Circle
Owner
Mr. & Mrs. David Loren or 6908 Oak Centerville MN 55038
Current Circle
Owner
Mr. & Mrs. Jerry Fuhrrneister 6913 Oak Centerville MN 55038
or Current Circle
Owner
Mr. & Mrs. Gregory Needham or 6918 Oak Centerville MN 55038
Current Circle
Owner
Mr. William Michael or 6923 Oak Centerville MN 55038
Current Circle
Owner
Mr. & Mrs. Scott Sears or 6926 Oak Centerville MN 55038
Current Circle
Owner
Mr. & Mrs. Patrick Dahl or 6926 Oak Centerville MN 55038
Current Circle
MrMrs FirstNarne LastNarne Address! City State PostalCode
Owner
Mr. & Mrs. James Halbert or 6907 Centerville MN 55038
Current Pheasant
Owner Lane
Mr. & Mrs. Barry Reiland or 6908 Centerville MN 55038
Current Pheasant
Owner Lane
D.P. & M.B. Branson 6913 Centerville MN 55038
Dagostino or Current Pheasant
Owner Lane
Mr. & Mrs. Donald Labonne or 6918 Centerville MN 55038
Current Pheasant
Owner Lane
Mr. Rodney York or 6923 Centerville MN 55038
Current Pheasant
Owner Lane
Mr. & Mrs. Kevin Navara or 6926 Centerville MN 55038
Current Pheasant
Owner Lane
T.E. & J. Tarnowski 6933 Centerville MN 55038
Peterson or Current Pheasant
Owner Lane
R.J. Stephan & K.E. Gardner 6907 Centerville MN 55038
or Current Sumac
Owner Court
R.W. Dailey & P.E. Arnold 6908 Centerville MN 55038
or Current Sumac
Owner Court
Mr. & Mrs. Michael Carter or 6913 Centerville MN 55038
Current Sumac
Owner Court
Mr. & Mrs. Daniel Martinez or 6918 Centerville MN 55038
Current Sumac
Owner Court
Mr. & Mrs. David Billingsley or 6923 Centerville MN 55038
Current Sumac
Owner Court
Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Steele or 6926 Centerville MN 55038
Current Sumac
Owner Court
Mr. & Mrs. Paul Wolf or 6933 Centerville MN 55038
Current Sumac
Owner Court
Mr. & Mrs. Michael Dunne or 6907 Centerville MN 55038
Current Tourville
MrMrs FirstName LastName Address! City State PostalCode
Owner Circle
Mr. & Mrs. Lawrence Klecker or 6908 CenterviIJe MN 55038
Current Tourville
Owner Circle
Ms. Dawn Speny or 6913 CenterviIJe MN 55038
Current Tourville
Owner Circle
Me. & Mrs. Kent Davidson or 6918 CenterviIJe MN 55038
Current Tourville
Owner Circle
Mr. & Mrs. Vincent Craigmile or 6923 CenterviIJe MN 55038
Current Tourville
Owner Circle
Mr. Jeff & Ms. Barbara 6926 CenterviIJe MN 55038
Weber Awker or Tourville
Current Circle
Owner
Mr. John Mersinger or 6936 CenterviIJe MN 55038
Current Tourville
Owner Circle
Mr. Gordon Rehbein or P.O. Box Hugo MN 55038
Current 324
Owner
L&G 6805 - 20th P.O. Box Hugo MN 55038
Rehbein, Avenue South 324
Inc.
Mr. Walter David & 6756 Centerville MN 55038
Pracher! Linda Vickers Centerville
Road
Anoka Property Taxation 2100 Anoka MN 55303
County Records & Third
Avenue
tervi{{e
1880 :Main Street · CenterviIfe, :M7{ 55038
'Estaflisfwf 1857 (612) 429-3232 · ;Fa?({612) 429-8629
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
APPLICA nON FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT
DATE PAID /0 -zt,-60
FEE ~. gz ~A.L
STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY c...c...-.\...,,~,\\... ~ ~~ ""~ ~
C>....\,q<.~<:>O'>cl.Pp~, "'~o0c ~ ~~..."- <i.t.. .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY:
~. _~A~\'_~
SIZE OF PARCEL (S)
'5 '{ ,\...", ~<:.-" ~'S.
{b3-
(;"""'-N\.~ ~~"'If>~;:t:~ PHONE # S'1[.,".2.1.';>5""
PROPERTY OWNER:
FEE OWNER: Co~",\:.r':':.. ~~<::.. ~"-
ADDRESS: ,"'&.,~ ("" ~,,",,'Cn"'-r- - ~\v~. ~'W') tl~b<.\<:lO:. ~~ S',SSc,,-\
APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY:
FEE OWNER
LEASE HOLDER
CONTRACT PURCHASER Y
OPTION TO PURCHASE
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST>: . ,~.\>'. f). '\\ f'~';- P"'~"~
,
* Plus any additional costs
incurred for engineering,
legal fees, publication or
other requirements.
/.
L_ _
Property is located in Centerville, MN - 54.73 acres
31 dt.
PID # :?23122340001 and 2/3122430001
legally described to wit:
Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) and the North Half (N
1/2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4), all in
section Twenty-tree (23), Township Thirty-one (31), Range Twenty-two (22), Anoka
County, State of Minnesota, except the South 528.64 feet of the North 578.64 feet of
the West 445 feet of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW
1/4), Section Twenty-three (23), Township (31) North, Range Twenty-two (22) West,
Anoka County, Minnesota, Subject to County State Aid Highway No. Twenty-one (21),
and any easements of record.
Jim March
From: dc [dcapra@isd.net]
Sent: Frlday, October 20, 2000 11:09 !WI
To: Jim March City of CentelVille
Subject: Ground Development
Hi Jim,
Would you please forward this to the mayor and council members for me. I do not have all of their email
addresses.
Thank you,
Mary Capra
Memo To: CentelVille City
Mayor and Council Members
I am aware Aimee Fairbrother has spoken to several of you conceming the development of 88 new home
sites on the property south of Center Street. I have many concerns has Aimee does with regard to the size of
this development and whether this is the right time for CentelVille to be adding 88 new homes to our
community. I am requesting the council consider the community as a whole before moving forward with this
development. I personally don't feel this is a good time to be increasing the population of our community.
Thank you for your time and consideration of my concems.
Mary Capra
10/23/00
t'
GROUND DEVELOPMENT, lNC.
7676 GOWEN VALLEY ROAD
SUITE 2$0
GOLDEN VALI.EY, MINNJ:."SOTA 55i!11
61i.6+6o!6i5 exl. II
nc.rimil.612-514-1321
Seplember 29, 2000
Planning and Zoning Commission
City 01 Centervllle
Cenlerville City Hall
1880 Main Street
Centel'Vllle, MN55038.g794
,
Dear Commissioners:
Thllnk you lor taking time to relliew our new single family home developmenl proposal and
provide leedbaek on the sketch plan enclosed. This is a 54 acre parcelloealed along the easl side
of Centervma Road and south of the Cemer Oaks subdIVIsion. The enolosed sketoh plan
represents a m!xI\Jre of lot slus from 13,197 sQlJllre leet to 41,980 square leel With an
aVQrage of 19,833 square feet. We feel thl. Is an appropriate lot size mix due to buffer
.eparatlon with the older Ceneer Oaks subdivision on the north boundary end the sen51ble U5e of
upland while preserving the parcel', WetlandS. In addition our design Includes prOVisions lor
eXlendlng Ihe CenteNille park trail system through the developmant. As part of your review
and discussion, Ground Development would like 10 speak about MUSA line issuee.
As means of further Introducing Ourt;elves to the City of Centervllle I wanted 10 provide you
some additional background.
GOlls exclusively In Ihe business of developing lots for single famUy homes. G.D.1. 15 owned by
Steve Fiterman. Steve got started in Ihe nouslng Industry lit II very young age through working
for his dad who founded Miles HomN. In 1971 Steve developed his first piece of land In
Brooklyn Center, which was a parcel owned by hia family. Shortly thereafter G.O.l. WIIS formed.
During the ensuing period, SIeve hes platllld over 1,500 single family lots In the Twin City
metropolUan area. The communities that G.D.I. has worked In Includes:
Blaine
Brooklyn Center
COcn Flaplds
Independence
Inve r Grove Heights
Lakavllle
Rogers
R06e1TtOUnt
Stillwater
Watartown
West Lskaland
Currently G.O.!. has plats In four cities Which are belng developad and marketed. The prioa Of
lhese lots range Irom 11rt;1 lime home buyer lots to oxocutiva larga Iof aslatas. As you can lel',
we have experience in all price rllngss.
f
GrounCl Development. Ino. (GOI) is a member of both the Sensible Land Use Coal/tlon as well as
the Twin CIties Builder's AssociatiOn. D$veloper's COuneil. We actively particIpate In both
organizations.
In summary, the strengths 01 GrounCl Oevelopment art I) our extensive experience and
knowledge of the Industry, II) our unique f1nan~al strength and III) our foCU$ and expertise in
marketing.
We look forward to workIng with the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Cny Coonclr and City
Stall In designing and approving a successful single famHy home development which we aU can
be proUd. I would be very pleased to answer any other questions you might have.
&J.--
Assistant Vice President
Ground Development, Inc.
cc: S. Fiterman GDI
f' I
:i E qi
-I pQ "
~, I.
.:
._----~--------~-------------:::~~~:;::~---.~--------------~------
I
~'
ll,
I
i I
. .
: :!
.....I!I!II.c;
e~ ~~ ;
6tJ1l. ~
D~Slil ~
...- "6
~ h
m
~~~,
I i ~~ !
~
.
ml-
H
~
, ' !,!
.wI !:,::;' Ci
J ..a!'"
1-
o
...1
-
v
..J
"'!N
.!
"I
.
..
M
"
$
~
.:: : ~! 1'\ '. :: : ;'::.', .: I' ,:~" I ; '. Ij. :l;:,
i ~i :~~.' ;.;j. :~.i . ,;;:- :.: : j i ; .' 1 :;,';::' ,,;
" :" :, ," I i',-', ."-- :::.'" '::'
_ ,;:,,;:i'~j,'i 5 ,",;",;,,\:,\;!i, :"
---
cm<aPT PIAl<
~
CllOutIIlllE_.llle.
.M__._......__M14~___
'---".
~-:n:;-.
=="WT'..
I) James R. HIli, Inc.
PI._~ I M'fWIS I SUlM:m"!J
..c..."......-.._
_1tH.....'IlI~,
---.-
---
i
~
I -
~
..
.. , ~
Iii 8 z
III
'I [
$I
e
! -
~
8
"'-, "
,
~-Ir-~ -
~\fi\.l i\
t::-iir" \
"~ IF- ..,..
· \11;- iril r
- ..;..,)-- -:,. . . ""
\-::: ......, /i.F 0J /. .. . '-;- ,: ..l!
, -A--i ' .. _ ~
\"""""""L I ~
~;Q I -\:';; T' t H'o:~~
::.. ~ /~"C -( r:r.~.1:'- + ,/.-r.j:I'/' r.
~ I----l ./\ ~ .1, · r; II {
i-...~~...... II .
_ t---.- ,,.}..". 7" I '
-~I--... '. ~.,i
::::- \- t::" :l. . ~ :!: I . -\'
"Y;:;' '- .f- .~ -:- ~''"' ~
~t- 'I ~I.;- "I- .~.:
I /; '- I _ ../ !l:I'...
/ I". _/. ,
. '.:.- ':!:!!:::-'}- . .
. . ..;.~' ':\ ;.
. -
;"'1 ~ '/ B/- ~ /.
..~. "
\. r .I.\\r, .
!!
~ ~ d eK J
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
i i~ <<!
--
COIl'l1:lr UP
.....
___1'IlIIIIT
,..--....~..
-~.-
James R. HUI. Inc.
1'INIIIlS/_1__
1IIl1:"'."_1~1iIoIIIiC."'"
~........ hit I.......
I--~
I
I
f
I'!;"
~i
I ~,
'11'
I
I
I
~
- _n_._jj.
~---~-r !
I
I
I
_-I
~
--I
~~ I
(,". I
(')"-
() l' j ~t \
{j: '- ~? I
, ) ~: ::~ I
~!. ~ M:
L,--,(,)t;
f. '. ,.jl
:: ~-) ~)
~) '--' 1 t 1 \
- --. ..:~- - ~ ~:J:
I II: II
, .
1\0, I
.
\ I f I
I I J
I I r
I I
II
I I
\ I
II
I I I
II,
Ill.
I I ~
: :If;
.._n____ ...LJ. I-
I ~ T
,
10/25/2000 16:42:02 20237TS-U
II
I:
~c=i~~EF~
n^I<'::-' 1
VI,I,...) I
,
"-
"
"
"-
"
,/
., /
,,/
L...... ,.
,/
\
6
OU TLOT B
I
I
L
r
,
"
"
I.
I' _~~-
1..""':::-:;"-
" 3
,
I
I
: ",..
,.
"
'"
'~.
,.
~,
.'
lr-
"
"
"
"
" 25
"
26
'-L.
- -'---~.
i~ -~r 1
31" 32 ': 33 I
i II II I
; II 1\ \
:: I[
"
I
L
r- lr,-:
I
: 40
I
I
I
I
L
,_.
PHEASANT MARSH
CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT EXHIBITS
FOR
GROUND DEVELOPMENT INC.
7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD, SUITE 250, GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427
PHONE: (763) 546-2625 FAX: (763) 546-7321
.IE
r----------I 2
I ,_-\1,-' (_-::)......-, "t.. I I
I ~,:;~;~ L_"'-'l.-+'! 1\.../\"
I ".,
" Ai
':~E~ ~~EF~ C;,\<S
"
D ' \
.( II
Q
'''-I ~"I'J I
. "'I"+i'
G. "I' ~ I
c ::~;
2
,ct--
5 II " 3"
I' II "
J' " "
-- ,I :3 II 2 "
I' " "
4 I' " "
" II "
II II "
,I " "
8
" " " I ,
i1 " 2 " I I I
7 6 4 3 " "
" " " I L
II II " " , 1 r
'I " " " I I
I JL JL___.J L _..1 ,
..Jf,-- I L
-'
,...... :-. ('
I I
If --, I
" I L
3 2 " , ./ r -
6 " , I
" I I
" I I I 4
" I I
JL " . I
, 1 I
I L
II. I
" 9
"
"
II
"
"
"
..1L
--.
4
-,
\
8
9
'jr--
q' 4
II
II
10
23
18
, - ::: -
I 17 12
,
~
r -
I 16
I
L
r
15.
N
5
6
$CALI:INfHl
o 100 200
r"'b-
"'"
,
I in~h _ 100 feet
SHEET I
SHEET 2
SHEET 3
SHEET 4
SHEET 5
SHEET 6
SHEET 7
SHEET 6
INDEX
TITLE SHEET
PRELIMINARY PLAT
EXISTING CONDiTIONS
PRELIMINARY GRADiNG & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
STREET PROFILES
STREET PROFILES
STREET PROFILES
~c=~~-;-~=F~ 8,~J<S 2
I
I
I
I
\ I
I -
\~I
I
I
..J.....
.'1.......' .TI ,,-r I
,VVI^L.\J\ I
, ,-,
OUTLOT A
7
PREPARED BY JAMES R HU.L. iNC.
JOEL G COQPF:R RF.G NO 18495
REGISTERED PROFESSIONJ\L CIVIL ENGINEER
HA.Rorn C. PeTERSON RF.G NO t2294
REGISTERED PROFESSIONJ\L LAND SURVEYOR
BENCIDfARK
TIM 0tI CORNER ar CUP-liE R01-\) & v<)Y"'<;ER CQIlRf g\:!..SO
TNH ON CORNER OF PIOtl[ER LANE & EAGLE TRAIL ~11.69
TN.. ON CORNER OF DUPRE ROAD'" PiONEER LANE 911.86
n.L.
-
(.)
c::::V>
- ~~
-'>':!
-o::::z!
_ =>::a.o
-- V> J"
::J:......~
lQ e
......t:::,..
....:z:-...
G
z
en'"
Q)
E
<<S
~
~ :;:
.0
......" ~
V> G. '"
ffi 5 ~
z .-
z . ~
~ ~t:
~_..-."
1\
(~_. ~.l
.,-..,-/
, _''8!
~r:~ l~
:i~..H
1 i ~ ia.. <i
O-.H'l
'" ! ~ ~. k
5~siH
l"~]: ~':. i;;
.,H~~H
_ It:;'il ~....'"
I'
II
Il
Ii
I j
. c
,
~
oz
z'.
:I: -~
en E-:C:
0:: z;
<<<E--< ~'i3
...sW ::llg
....~w P-..
E-o~ffi~g~
z-,! _W~
<~~ &i~.
wi E-o Q~
<....- Ill:.
CLIVE-< 0>-
:r:: z~
iJ... ~>
~2
,-,8
~
DRAWN BY
.S5
DATE
10/26/00
REVISIONS
CAD fiLE
2023715 U
PROJEct NO.
20237
SHEET 1 OF a
~ m:Sr.RIPTlON
FlCl<;TINl': CONDITiONS
EX1STlNC ZONING R-5 (SlNCLE FAMILY
ESTATES RESIDENTIAL)
ACREAGE 54.7J ACRES
PROP(l<;rD <;ITF nATA
PROPOSED ZONINC PLAN QEv'ELOPWENT
MINIMUM Sf:'fB/l,CKS
FRONT
SlOE (STREET)
9.0t: (HOuS,( It G~,o.,(;(.)
REAR
SMAU.EST LOT AREA
LARCEST lOT AREA
AvERAGE LOT AREA
The Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4-) of the Southwest QW:l.l"t~r (SW 1/4) €lnd ttle NQrth
Hall (N 1/2) or the Southwest Quarter (S1'( 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4),
all in Section Twenty-three (23), Township Thirty-one (31), Range Twenty-two (~2).
Ancka. County. St<>te of Mi.nnesot&. except the South 528.64 leet of the North 578.64
feet of the West 445 feet of the Southeast Qutlrter (SE 1/4) of the Southwest
Qutlrter (SW 1/4). Sedion Twenty-three (23'. Township Thirty-one (31). Range
Tweuty-two (.22), Anokil County, Slate of Minnesota
1
I
,
[
I ~J : JJ
'::-~-=~-=--=-I:J-i --
flU: flOOT
I '.fl--
1;<5-1
nci:~-
1&;"'1;,"1
.J 8 ::::1
z 1<(1
r-;~:~r-;TF.) ,VJ
iJ
: 01
li\1
:I.L]
<~ 1 ~;\
cJ ,_J
-" i,~1
:i : r"1
<:ili,;1
oj, "I
'-',
6Q ;!
~F;;,\~,S
--::-,l
o~ I
I
1
1
I
VI I
(:J::: I
1
:J I ;1'
"
---L,'~
Ii)
C.'I
()
-/
'L
~ )
~':
<-
I,,"
1-/
I,;':
I~'!
I":
(J
I
I~
I~
If!
I~
I ill
I~
t"
I
I
I
___________J.
I" '3
'n/)~/'nnn '~:41~12 20237DD
LOTS
RO,W.
OUTLOT A
OlITL01B
OVERALL
]9,40 ACRES
9,94 AcRES
495 ACRES
044 ACRES
5473 AcRES
"C-~ITC-;:) 0^1/::-
VL_I'~ I L_I \ \jrl(.....:;
I'r-" I.-r-c) ,-... ^ I,":::
C_! ~ 1 C_I'" \...'1-'1,,-,
1-----------
I
I
I
1315.76 589029'02"E
I
I
I
I
It; I
'<0
I~~'c' I
1,,5; I
I~: - I
~__..J 60
::; 'Cf,::;R~ ~~Rc.:[~:;:
o
/
-, / \
/ \
/
/ - \
/
,
"
"
C\Jf...r_-:)-<-ir\"\
L_I'vL_' 111.-11 ~
I
'-- 1 \ ':; col
/ '-- ~~(
,0 I '-- \ -< I ''is!!
(l '-- [)u_
I - '-1 2 I I
"
... 1 2
2
"
;9
e
"
"
"
~ OUTLOT ~:~m2 sr
445-05 N89.29'02"W
~
~f"i6~61~ao22~ l~ae291~a62s ~~~26~; IOOOO~
110 118 118 118 Ilg II 1"'\
II~ 6 11:1 I; 4 II; 3 II::! 2 II~1~"5'Hl
IliH67srll- 5 1I'33ns.rIIIJJ7Jsrll-'J.17JS.II,!, ~I
1 I n)7J ';.fl I II :: II ",'" ",I
-,
'"
<(
O~
0:-
N
w,
-':I:
-' .
5<
[50
1--0
:z~
W
U
"
;.,
10
"
o
z
'"
'"
.;
'"
'"
"
,-
'f',~:>'
\"'..;,~:...
I -:\
I -.;:\'>..>
~ -:~-<->
L:; -::...
r
I
]
1::\
''t~
1321.71 N89019'41.W
2J091
~
-
27
!"
~
;..
..
o
o
'"
"
"'
ol
ID
ID
""et>
N
DRAIN'<'G~ ANO UrlL/rl" EA$[A.fD'ITS
ARE SHo;m rHL'S:
35F((T
20 FEET
\0 fEET
25 FEET
12,706S.F.
+8.496 S.F.
19.290S.F.
~-\
r'
o ,
mLnJ
L
f
BEING 6 'EEl I~I ~!:iTH AND ~O~MI.G
~!OE: LOl L11IE.; AND REAR lOT ,-IN0:5.
AND 12 ,EEl I,., 'MOTH AIm AD.JCININ(;
S;REET L,..,C:S. UNLESS OTHER""SE:
\tmiC/l,iEO':M T\oi\C PL.....;
SCALE!NFEET
o I'X'
n....-
1 ,nch"lOOleet
,.,f-r. \'Tr-l:) (~'. ~ I,':::' '/
,-,C_I~IC_I' U/-'I'~ '--
2 .- -,
3'3
J25,~9 "1
.]
525715.. gl
-]
_.J2G.Ql --'
2 -l
.]
Zl'iHISf. .]
Jl1,~ _J
-l
3 .]
.]
_J
1!iI~5 -,
1 ]
<<: ~
~I ~
6 -]
31~~ ~r I
I
\
J I S
~24.~
_+---1-.___
c::;n.GT ;.,
OUTLOT A
!"'
b
"'
;.,
.-
o
o
'"
OJ
"
ID
ID
2!5671S...
~25.00
I
I
I
,
I
I
1
I
,
I
,
_ _____ __ _ _____ _ _ _..l__ ____
(.)
c:
-
-
-
-
.-
::I:
a:
en
Q)
E
<<S
:C,) """:)
.
/
I
'"
~~
'$! .
0:::: J ~
i7l "~
:; J i
C>:
~ 32
~ ~ ~
~ ~!
ffi 21
z
5 ; ~
"- N l;
,
i\
, ,
\..----
--"
j ..~~~
...;f..~"
.'!' . to" ~ ~
'.~.q
jhli:i:.~
i;~.]a
Hl ~i~
~ ~ e- ,,"'..
_t.. ".:;.:;
I
,
i
j
g
,
N
"
,"
Uz
z~
-~
~ <- E-<~
W j z'
~. rz:!~
""d g Q.. ::s g
~~>-~.
~Q: 9~
E--o -<5rz:!w
Z~25"'>~
<C';:i! rz:!-
C!J~:1 Q~
.....Orz:!
r.:l p::
:I: Cl.
ilo
0>
z~
::>~
O~
p::c
",8
~
DRAWN BY
PLM
DATE
10/25/00
REVISIONS
BOOK/PAGE
NONE
CAD FILE
202J7pp.dlllg
PROJECT NO.
202.37
FILE NO.
1-00-233
SHEET 2 OF 8
"
<-
IIII~'TC-F{S_,~,
rl \....' I '11~_
,-) A II ~--::
II'''\/-\I~
I
r ~ I SI I
;,~ I~ : I
10' .l
~~ I (i ~..'
t'~ ~
,~, ,'I
:) I
-~ .t--< I
II ~ j
Ilr
I ,
I t I
II~'>.
'IE' -
II ~'.
I !,
I ! .'
Id-
_1: '
-, i
(:)
en
S)
u:'
~ )
(/l
~,~ ~-;' ~~~.>~
/
./
,/
,
. ,
G::
, ,
t;
,
,
I
I
I
16,38,04 20237EX
10/H/2nno
,
\
,
i,
.~ .
,
,
/'
:.
r\ ^ I<'c:,
'-" II,~.
~
~
\ ,...'~
-....,.,
I
I r-f
"/.'&'
)f
-....,.,
'5
-....,.,
/
I"
r"" ~Xl5TJN{;tlR~lNAG<:
OtlCH
;:' '''~}DJ~ ,"' :.
t ',- '..: . : ,~ :"
~. .. . " "L
. . .
~ .,,,. -..
. .
. .
i'- T~' --. - ,
I
I
"
,
I
I
t
,I
I
I
"--,XISTlHGDRAlNAGE
(lITCH
~/
;.~>
I
,
I
\
~
E;:~c,~)~::_~~~
/
/.'
;,-~/ ~
,~
~ 4J
I
:~c~~~;TF(
o
~~
/
/"
.{/
. .
o
~
_;<Is.nH~ ClllA~4Ct
"'OllCH
/
I ,\",
,"'01 -
I. '''',
'I
.rf'"'~'
(~
~~<V'~~~
'". ~".--,
., "
~~.
,-
"., ~
"
'<..-',
~
,
" -.~
"---C:~" '-' <II r ~"'-
~"ij~'"
.~ '.:~. :-~I!I= ~~.
'~;'~~.~;~1t.- ~.:.
=: .. (:1..
." " """.
"'- - - .
. ..-.
--:' ..' ..-y ,:. "\.-.;,
.~, \"' ~.
"~~~~-;~.'~,"~ .- . \'
I
I
"
!'.AI,'::
\.Ir,l,_
I
I
~
I
" I
o "" I
-. "
/
8
2
~ r-I. j-ro:.- L:l
~":-_''1\L_''
,.....,',,'::::
urq ~ ~
~-~
~,.~
""~~.,
.. d_' ~~~."~
00=
;,...
""'.-
txlSnN~OFlA"~~.
OO~
o
WOOIIl
I:.C fRIC BOX
t:^ISTlNG EL EVATION
EXISTING SPOT E~ SURFACE
EXISTING ASPHAL
i;;~
,..''''
-j
,_....__.1
E2J
I
~{E-O
,~,--
o
EXISTING WETlAND
L SURfACE
EXISTING GRAVE OWER LINE
EXISTING OVERHEAD P
EXISTING FENCE E/IREES
EXISTING TREE UN
ExiSTING CONTOUR
EX/STING WA T~'::'~NSE'W[R
EXISTING SAN _ _ _
BENCHMARK
VOy....GER COURT
F OUPRE ROAD ok EAGLE TRAIL
TNH ON gg~~~~ gr PIONEERRa~ ok 8cpIONEER LANE
{~~ g~ CORNER or DUPRE
913.50
911.69
911.86
::
I
I
II
I :
I !
I I
I I~,,, r;~
I \j\_' '. L.\" I
\ ),
I
L__-=_
o _
,
'!
N
1.-
SCALE II'( FE~J>o
o _100 _
1""""1-. I iich= 100 feel
300
,
(.)
c::g~
- >- ~
-~:z:::
- a:: ~~
:E~J~
~ ~
'" -
O::~B.~
~ j;:
~ .s:
en ....... ~ i:
Q) ~ ",,-
E ffi ~g
z . ,.
CU i'1 !l~
-:> ~ <'01 if
~')
\~
! ,
. l~$ ,
Lr~_~o i i
~;'~ii
:i5U;d ! E
H~ ~'i~i I 1 I
'?~E:;!H !
"\: ~ ~ i: I I
:'P"i' f
Hd!.d I
I
~
~
t)z
;00:'
ITl lj} -;
..... :z; E-< ~
{/) 0 :Z;z
~<{E== ~~
<go ~8
;:;;~:z g-g
l::O ...
~;t)~g;~
<~t.:) ~o
CJ')~Z _~
<lj~ Q~
"'-1 rn Z"
::z:: >< ::> ~
0... r.J 03
~o
()8
"
~
~
ORA'Mi 8'1
's'
DATE
to/26/00
REVISIONS
CAD fILE
20237EX
P'ROJECT NO.
20237
SHEET .3 OF B
Ii\!
It I I
.......~ I .... " . ,J i
1,1 \ I ~,." "."H"''''; , ~
iii I: ' /' / '. '. i' - ,',ee,',,,,,,- 'l, ~" 1 CE""" ",,' ': """" G"C ' :
)f ,I ~."': ..' '. ,/. J .. j~I ;iA/ I " ~ ,'Iiil I 1 1 I 1 s~
I I .0 .1 f'" ..'
, .-
., /
I - , " ., I '11\ "-----::--'
,,, "'n--'~ .. I''''" :::;;'1~..~,.. !'.'5TI' ffEt' ~"\ 'I. ~ '~ .:;, ~,JI .~, JI ' ~.' j: i. fJ .. ~j-L "'. '"
r1v.,.c.h:'_~ \..~ ~0." " \ lftJ /''' L:w...J." 1jj i > 1
-;-F;:':L:..~/:' ---""11 .liSl!!:~."ll jl' P'",' ~, 6 ' -, , , . . . -' '" . . --"
.. , Il" U.\\ , ' ,,_~~",'" -~ " - ~.~ i w,
,
"
(/J ,-,
CO) /
() OJ L/. .
i:J::: ;
~) " \'
~ . .._,.' ",' .,' / \ . y""""- [/.'...:-]1 --, . "'." \. \.
. t . ~\ "\:.J ."'" /,.' ,,,,..',,,.I/, '-.il ~ " r . ,t'j.. :.
1~~',Y'j' ".. '-"0' ! ~~'" .~, "~~" rr- w~< ~ ~~.~. .'""'~ Ir;=~~ r;;1JJ'~~Ji:~r.~} f{~' \Ifl
'.) _ n 'li;.:r.J^~ ,,)ft! 4 \" =1+== . 1 ~.~ .* ,c/, ',/
.~ ~~t'l i'Scc-".?> I iYR/p:,,~. I; .;;,':.' ..~ :~ '~."'.- ~J"l':"",~b. i j,
~~Il f>~~ ~ "I~I\~~'i}lla Ii "O~.".. ' ., "-"'P ".~~,:ts~~'...x::::k~ .
1\ I~ I' \ /;;;~~.~l!{ ~~ I' ~ ':. filii........... [. "\~~: CH? ," ,.' ',.y".. '--: \
II ~ 1 '0 ":'1\. "i/1",,' ',c~, ,,'., Ii \ ''lIb .' f,,, , . ; ---
~ .' 2\ ~ ":~;~. I~~ --1-' ,;'" '~ I "'oj ~ lWr.t./J n ~ ' .'
IIIi1i I'~ ~~ ;;,' ~?{1 !,Ji~iS '.' LEWIIl 0.7499 ACRtS
II f ,. ~."g:t~_-: __, '\~,'l\I,\~ \, ~~"'^~o . ~,:X:~ ~;~L ~,r~ i ~~:,iii~g ~t~~J~~DI~~~:G UNIT ~,T~::~:'~'OA;;A = 25620 ACRES
I ~ _ \~~. ~'/, " .--J -r '. ...12 ' ~~, ~~. '. __~)~. ,~. """~. '!.~ ~ +~OO~.OO ~~i~t:~g g~~ ~~f{~R
" '.'0" , " . ._. ~ I' ~ " = ".- """,,..~ ."'^," ..,
I I' ",", ,.1 rJ;. T'~~'" '? ~~ "'" > JiS':'!,'~,:. ~' ~::: ;::o:~ ':;:::. m."'" "C ' ,..""
lllli..... ~~~ ~~rmlr"'" v~/,~ "~~ ~~~fC~"/ 1
I' . . ....... - -I'.... .~ ,.// 1-:;%:; " ~~''),WI'"
I I: : - '''".'' ':' l~ '" _.< ~:.. '\j'l. ,
: \..,'<' .== .,\ "
. I I
,
o
C) ."
(J:.':. <(
L,j (,')
f..
-, ~ )
"-
fXISTING WFTI ANO FXI.AVATm
32.665.71 SQ, FT. ""
.-",-
I
tt 0
.....1......._
o
< 19 :.
..' ........
1000
.
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE
EXISTlNC fENCE
EXISTING TREE: LINE/TREES
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING WATERMII.IN
EXISTING SANITARY SEwER
EXISTING STORM SEWER
EXISTING WAfER LINE
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED SrORM SEWER
PROPOSED Sll T FENCE
Jp
AQUAnc
BEI.1C\.!
W'
----------
fie".]
+Soo.oo
,
P"""lI
TEMPORARY ROCK
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
PROPOSED SPOT ElEVATION
PROPOSED wETLAND FilL
,
__.J
::.:.:.:.=-~"":--
,'--
SCAlE IN FEET
50 jrol}
~1I
/;"'.__.=-
/' i;=~-=
/L _.....~
.....>#]!
Ul '
1 inch"" 50 1"1
~
,r_OllOfF_ -'~
lO_<Il:~_'lI1E ....
ROCK r;nNS1"AUCTlON f.:NTRANC[
o
o
". .~. .~~I
VV't'J'1
I
N
,w
.
PROPOSED wETlAND t.t1TlGA TION
RF.NCHUARK
TNH ON CORNER OF QUPRE ROAD .t vOYAGER COU~T 111350
TNH ON CORNER OF PIONEER LANE &: EAGLE TRP,lL 911.59
TNH ON CORNER OF OUPRE ROAD .!c PIONEER LANE 911.86
.J.,/
Nil\.
10:1
J,T
TYPICAl POND
CROSS SECTION
;:;!:O:!::'-
-.,--..
---
---
Sit T F'[NCF
.
(.)
-= ~ ~
;<
-~ .
=gi~~
:i:::it
~ !e
.......: t:l '" ~
..... :z -....
'" .
en ffi J1.~
(I)::i
EE55~
<0 ~ ",::
_~!li5
... a... .,.... f
~,.
(\. (\
\"~-------:-'
. --------,/.
6..!ol
o.~~1'O~o
~~iJO~j
~~~i.~H
. ""
-=. ~ ~ f ~!"
~Fi..t;i
iH ~io
~iin';.~
_ i ~~ ~,~:;;
j
p.,
....:I
o
Po:
....
Z
o
::c u
Cf) z
p::Q z
<qlfl ~9
;:;!~~ p.,8
.....~>zl 3~
:z:,; ~~>zl~
<" :>~
CI)~ ~ ~g
<'d_ 0::
j:il Q Q>
::c -< Z~
p.., Po: ::J >
.., 0'
Po: "
)-0 ..,g
Po:
-<
Z
Sl
::3
>zl
Po:
~
"
,
DRAWN BY
CMIl
DATE
10/26/00
REVISIONS
CA.D FilE
20237G
PROJECT NO.
20237
SHEET 4 or 8
,
t
l
t
,.
[:..
I It
\ ,.
____.._u~+
I
I " '" I-,r-c):,"-'
rl'-'l~ I \-:_1'.:.......____
~~~J;: ~S
~
Co)
C'"
- ~~
_ Is! :>l .
~~J~~
.............. ~
'" '"
. '" -
,....... ~ g-;:
...... Z - '-
~ ~ ~
~ ~~l
E'" .-
f5 .5 *
z .-
CO ::;; . '"
-:>>~U
EXISTING ASPHALT SuRFACE
D
I
--0---------
EX,SnNG GRAVEL SURFACE
EXISTING OV[RHE.l.D POWER liNE
EXISTING SA~IITARr SEWER
EXISTING rORCE""AiN
EXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPhONE
ftlSl\NG UNDERGROUND GAS ~AAIN
E/IS,ING WELL
EXISTING ELECTRICAL 60X
EXiSTING MAILBOX
UI:,TlNG FENCE
EXISTING WATER MAIN
EXISTING SANiTARY S(\',[R Sf'HER
PROPOSED SANITt,RY SEwER
PR0PCSED \'I~,T[R MA:N
P'fWPGSED STORM SE'tiER
~~
; \
l! ' ,:
\,~--
. .
'---_.-~
.~,
o
o
CO
-..I----'--I~
=
AU. WATERMAIN IS PVC C-900
AU. SANITARY SEWER IS PVC SDR .35
ALl SANITARY SfWER WANHOlES ARE I'olTH .1' DROP
.
-1-......-1-1-
.
'''';: I ;1 I'
\' ;;:-,l'
;1'"
L
lo\D'"
~~c~~~~EF,: C;,~l<S
o
...
Ii
'/'
I
I
C,~\i<S
/'~_-~ '''''Ci:1
'-..-'LI ~ I L.I \
t: ::":Ei~TEF~ C,~,~<S
2 ,
r-'II'r-~)T,,,~, '-- " I
(_1\ '-' c.:- 1 I \.J 1 ~ /
- , , "
8- . '--c. i
I 2
Itm",... "
5 3 "
"
" 4 2
"
2 3 2 II
4 "
"
3
4
or
9 10 11 12 13
6
,
I", '-rl.r,~
I' VUIL'_"
, ^
I, n
~!
ij ..8,,;
-a.;~~h
~i~:H
l: ~ So. ~ ~
~~lF;~
j",f,l
~ <; t,;,i - i;
,,,.>!.
i ~ $: ~ ~..;
_ :r~~ ~..5;;
i
i
,
J
.
"''''
r\:o1t.#'
\
\ .
\'.0:
"/. '0
~
i
3
i
I
~
(;)
(/)
()
""
I
I
I
~
-,
I
I
J
,
I
I
J
....
I
I
,
I
I
I
J
\ _-:::::::1
1...--:::--- I
r-- I
I I
7 I
I
,
I
I
I
".::" I
~
-"
OUTLOT A
~:f.l;"
'"
OUTLOT B
2
3
~
.~
Z (.lz
-< ~:I.
~ .....~
ffi ~ ~~
0::: >- :z: z
<>:< f-. [sllJ
""=::t ~::i ;:!l g
,.o::;'!i!e:: 0..0
....~~~9~
3g >-"~~
--....Q:"~ W.
U)~ -< ~~
<tlZ a:
I:i1 - ~,..
:r: ::s :z: ~
::l ::> >
p., r.:l 03
~ po:o
p.., t:J8
n--i
(j
.-
I
.-1
,,1
('~ CI
i ~5
>1'"
~~\ ~i
(/) "i ,;
IJ::: <(j 8~
L'J "":\ r-
,- q ,", '
~5 '~i' n ~j
.---1 t,!.
r '..
i b 1
it
'~
I I
[I ~
III
I l'
Ii
Ii
i I
, '
I'
I
I
\
,
1
u:::
~ )
" -
"
,~
,.
,';, 26
'.'
-",-/ ~......_-
27
.
,
~
I
,
I
,
I DRAWN BY
, .ss
, DATE
I 10/26/00
I REVISIONS
,
I
,
I
lOll ,
I
N
RENCHMARK
TNH ON CORNER OF DUPRE ROAD &: VOYAGER COURT 91.)50
TNH ON CORNER or PIaNE'ER lANE &: EAGLE TRAil 911.69
TNH OH CORNER Of DuPRE ROAO &: PIONEER lANE 911.86
SCALEINrEET
o 100 ZIYJ
r"1lI... _
1 iloh"l00fee\
CAD FILE
202J7U
PROJECT NO.
10237
SHEET 5 Of B
.._...1-u____
10/25/2000 16:37:44 20237U
930
,"
925
920
915
910 "
~
u
z
"
905 .
900
895
890
885
0+00
.
930
925
920
915
910 r
905
900
895
..
,.
i
i
i.
890 i'
885
8
.
" 8
o ..
6 a;
~
~,
o
-
oi'
&,
\
\
\
,
,
-I.IOX '
1+00
~
o
,
~
"
-,
14+00
.~,~~,~nnn .~..n.n" ~"~..ft_p
.
"
~
-,
2+00
,
d
m;;
.[
. ~!
~ ~~
~ 1'-,'
~] -.
.8
't!2
'0
1-.-,_;~
.
- 0
Q
~
~
.
~
;g,.-
."
~'"
.w
-.!
,.
"
,
,
,
. ,
15+00
~,
~:
: :1
o. 0
01], <IIi
,
,
"
.
N
~ -
d:
<ii"
.
~ g
"
~ I;;!
. .
;!; ~
.
3+00,01( Pili
910,7Q-P'y1[LDI.
ve..l00!OO'
"'~.20'--
i
,
I
i
I-
I
i
,
'"
,
,
!
3+00
"
.
~
r
11
~!
-'
i
...j'..
.1
"
~ g ~ g
~ 'i'~ .S
9 ~ ~ ~
. m 0
~ ~ ~
; ~
~
4+00
o.
N'
~.
-,
Hi
,
~ g i:' ~ ~
a U I '! .....
g t: 1.' ::J ~
; ~ i' 8:
~ ~. . ~ 8-
~ ~
i"
i,:
o.
"!:
.;;,
,..;.
"-
~
-
> '
. i:i
~ .~
. .
. .
~ ~
o
o
~
a;"
O.~O,..
"
,
. \ /
\/
.
"
.
~
o
,
ii;
/v---~-
,
:oJ
~ ~
8 .
g ~
.J.. <i.
5+00
~
.'
o
<lli
--or
!"
__._.__"_ _n.... _ ..1..
, ,
I ';
~~ -~-----~--~--~~--~
- -- 17+30.00 p~ ' , ,
~09:OJ- PVI :~'t. - -.-. -
~-'QO.(lQ' .
r-.C!-1J,
j;
i
J ---
-- -~,-._-!.-
16+00
i
'-1-- '
1
.i'-
!
!
+ 0
18+
. O.?O"!
; ,: ~'-{-;:-,~;~":; yF
T' . i
,
I
19+00
.
.
iii,
~~
,
,-
61-00.00 PVl
912.20P'JIELEV.
'vc..lOoioo' -
i.4':'o.!i:'"
-Ii
.
.
.
:li
.
.
'[
'1-,
.-!-
6+00
.'
.
.
~.
I
~-;----"--
!:
,-
I'
[ ..
\.'
,
o
~~
z "
~ a
.
.
9
.
,
o
oi
.
o
d
"
.~ !
--~
>'-~
~ d a
l1- ~ ~
8 . .
:ii .I"l ~ .. ~..
-+ d .. d
j! Cii ~ ;;
!
-'i
,
g~w
,
"
> "
. >
8 ~
g O!
..;b iii
'lO+CO.COP""
~-9t'o..3a'p~"f'LN.-
VC..100,OO' .
1ll..0.2f:
'f
!
2 +00
~
"
,
ii
~
~,
,
.
.
--',-
ai:
,
:
-r
i
,.,.;
~: ~
~' ~
6 ~
.s ~
:> I"';
~ . :oJ
". ... ~
~-',t i
~ g,
~
,S
9+0a.oq PVI
912.18 PVl ~LEV.
VC_loa.oa'
1,/;0.13"; . .--
-0.50;;
O.5~
.........~:--::--......-
-----r--
7."P\II
9n....""'ELEv.
-'.
~-;
~ ,~ .. I,:
~ ~ ,;' i
;1 ~f
~8 JI'I'
~ s:i1 ~;.
r~; ~:..~
-~-, f" - ~- -~i:'=r~'
!
,
:oJ
~
~
8
g ~
.~ ii.
~ . .
t'
,
; I
::' !
~l'1'
,
,-
I
I
. ;~
"
~:
~;
~,
-Ql'-
,
0'
-,
.
o.
.,
~'
"':
~:
i
,
.__..J
.,
.. .
. ~ I'
: ~ . i '
I
",-1
,
:-1--
i
i
.j
:: i
,~:: !
..:":w"t-,--
:q.
;':11
,I_I'
_I,' .!t...-
~ ~ ~-
't:; ...
~ t
Fl ~'~---
.11
"j '"
",.
i
!
I
. ..
~ L. -';"~'_ i ~,;!J~t':"""";'~"1
.... ~.~---;-_ ~'.---r..... ,. .,f'. :22+5-+.80\....,;'. f
! ._~ i: "~;T ~~~;~' mV'"1
x II. >-~ <.:.:.: - ,-f I
~ ~~ ~ "'~"~1 t ..___.____l~._,-L.
"3; g' .. --j
N ~ r. ,".ij ;.' ,.
, II ~. . < l-
,~t. I ..' L !~:~-\-:~:.
"..-!.:~J.-....:'J'
'.....-1;,1 ".... ic',I.,_i
i', " ;',.:' , " ':" l~ .
:' 'j"',:' T
i -,.", I:.
;",,!' !
-..F-
'j
1+
2+
9+00
.
o
~
~
2 "
~ ~
6 ~
. 0
N .
: q
!
0;,
"
~
~
~ :> ,I- ~
~ d ] _
~ ~ : 9 ~
:; 5 :;; :
S; ~ g
;~ '"
"
0.50
,
~ ~
. >
o .
~ ~
J; ii
10+29]J P'A
911.5J'P\IlELEV.
VC""l00,OO'
",';'0.18.
. ,
.
.,
~
:ill-
R
~
-'- - g
.[
~ ~
d
~ ~
. ~
~ 9 Ii
..,'j IlL
~
r.:' ;
L
H
~ ~.
" 5
g,.
>;
..
"
~
~
Q
,'~
"
~
..
J:
.1
.'
10+00
- ~.
"
o
.:
~ g
o ~
o .
~ ~
:;!- <;-
! ~ i
il;! lllJ
~ ii
o ~ '1
~ ~-i
~ ~~i
~ O,"!~
i
.._.L
,
.,,"
.
.
,
8
~
"':'
~
.
.
.
,
-t
~ ~
I'i ~
. "
:::: ~
.
-i.
o,!l31f;
g
-~i
o
. .
;:x;
; ~
11+00
~i
g:.,-
,
.
ij
.!
,
.,
"
,
,
"r--
,
i
.
111.00.00P\Il
912.18 PVI ELEV.
VC..l00.00'
.;4-0:i6 '
!-- >- -~--+----
I\. > d-' : .
;_Oi'.' ~ ~ ~ '
~ 5i ~
: ~ 5 _E ~
:
'.
i'- ..
,
,
~--c_' I'
o V'j'-
+0
12+00
R
.
o
.,
.
.
~:
.,
,
L..
,
!'
[:
i
-1.'-',
J ~h
i i
. \ ~9POSED iGflA[)( .
'\ -l;:X1:~r:f'~AOf;
, O.W%
I
J
i
!
,-
,
,
I
!
i
"
i
1,.,
i '.
I"
,
,1-,
.e:l.ce'_
I
,
i
~.
,
24+00
i
"i'
I
i
T
..(..,
I
r
-~r:'-
ii,
,
,
___4---:-
J !.
l! ~~
~ ~~
:a 8"
.-8 -Q-;'-
...~ ~g
'i'
,.:
"1
2+00
i
-.-!--
.l.
"
t
,
,
,
,
.t
t
I
;>
;;
I
~.
~i
--1
,
i
i.
,
....---1'.-
,
'"
S! d
. ~
_84.,.
g ~
. "
. 0
N .
-,
-",j.
T
'.
i
'._.t.,_
i
..ut
g
.. 26+50.00 p~ -. g
gog.4.5 PIA ELEV..t
VC-l00,OO' -' "....
-I, ."'..0.12:.
: . i
~
-~ ~
. 2
Ii ~
· Ii
P
J; ~
N .
-,
'-.'
!:
;':1
i-: -'-.:
I
i-'
r
.,
~
~.
"I
EXISTING GRADE
,
~'
~,
.
,
i.-
.-j-
~ ;
'8 g
o
~
-0.9!:
~
:s ,;:l
. \0
....8 0.;
g l'il
. .
~ ~
27+
.
~
,
-Q,50X
"
.
0'
.
,-
--,-----t---
I
j'"
!
14+00
o
~;
g~
-.'1>'
" (-.-,:
t'
T-
'.'
t
,
,
+00
.
~
930
925
920
915
910
905
900
895
, 890
885
15+00
930
925
920
915
910
905
900
895
890
885
(.)
c:'"
~>- ::;
;l
-'!:!
-e<
-:::0
-- '"
::I:......
'"
e<
~
CC:~
13
z
~
2 .
J~ ~
~
~~
en
Q)
E
CO
""'?
.
JI-
........ !:i ~
V} & t
a:= ""...
~ u e
~ . .
a' ~ ~
i
I
I
7+00 00
DUPRE ROAD
l
~'
! - \
\_~-.~.!
. .
o..~ E
g~~
" ..
H~
..;:'~ l
~~$
Hi
I'
Ii
II
!
I j
I:;
, .
c:
n
'.0
~:o~
Hi
!:~
:H
,
~
Uz
z'_
~~
::r:: Ul e-. ~
fQ Z~
<.~ ~~
~~ &:: 5:8
~ 0 o~
E--t :::I: Q: ....:I...
-p,,~~w
:2;'" .... ....
<C ~ f-o ~
~~ ~d
~~ ~ Q~
~ts~ o~
::c [J) z~
p.. ~>
O~
~g
~
~
,
DRAWN BY
PLJ
DATE
10/26/00
REVISIONS
BOOK/pACE
CAD FILE
20237PRF
PROJECT NO.
202.37
riLE NO,
SHEET 6 Of' 8
I
'.
.
S lq
~ ~
895g
890
;
,
;
885 !
880
0+00
925
920
915
910
905
900
895
890
885
880
925
920
915
910
905
~
9008
~
.,
<6'
g!
~
"'i
lii
.'
.
N;'
g;
. ~._.
,.
o
~,
;
i
(-
-->---
"''''
,.
,
~.
1+00
>-t--
..
i
2+00
,
.
i
i <I
t
~
~ ~;
" .
+ +'
'" r-i
,
~
~
-~ ~-
c .
~ g
" ~
I'
~
i'
"'\"
":'1
w,
!;
J+oo,od:"PYl
m.25P\r1 OE"',
VC=IOO.OO'- .
U..OOfi'
--"";i-
~r~-
I
i,
I
C
,
,
!
,
,.
i"
I
'l
3+00
..
-.
t.
.'
$,
<Ii:
~!
8:
.
$,
:tit
5f' .
~',
,
. i.:
.
6"
<;;:
.
-"";
~
c.
~
~
Q;
&
i
;
I
f'
5.+50.00 PIA
!lla.5O'p", :tl.EV.
VC-IOO;OO'
1.(.00.13:
I
;;
. ,~
~
. ?ROf'DsW GR~oE:-
'r~~mNG ~
._J_-,~-,_" 0.50:11: )-
--~.,....\
-o,~
,
---....
--"..;-
~
z
a z
~ ~,
~ e
g .
~
+
~
\:
~
8
8
~
;>"
~
w
<
~
.
.
~
i
'>.'
~ d
~ ~
8 ~
8 :<l
+ ~
In,d>
\:
~
.8
g
;l;
~
8
f
,
..
d
&
i
PHEASANT LANE
~
~
.,
.
~;
~'
~
"';-
;
,
).-
- ;~
HOO.oq "'d-"'"-
9($.6D pl,f ae:v;
'VC"lOO,ocr
-",';\417:.
i:"
i
"'o.e:17';--
"
- ~ ~
;; ~
u ~
z ~
. ,
" 0
; ~>')
g 81"-
C!; ~~
f
~ ~
c ~
c ,
~ .
~ ~
,
;
I
I
~ '
I
;
I
i
10/25/2000 16.39.18 20237PRF
.,
.
aii
g'
'i
~'.
z
:~ ~.
~ t
~ .
~ ,.j ...
) ~'
~.
\: .
~ \:
8 ~.'..'
ci ~
~ ~
- ~
,
"T ";-
..,I
!"
, i.
,_ ,J,.u~'..i
I' . i
, i
.,
I
,.
I
2+00
o
ii
I
-t
~
8'
:l!"
0,
..
~i"
I
s.
,,~,
i
~;
"
0'
~:
~
.'~..
L..
t..-".'
"
.
"
gi
+
.'
:;:
.,
~
~:
i-
__,.L.:
,
----'---L,-
!:
L----
!
f-"
I
I
!
.-1-
I
I
,
I
,
,- ~ -,..
~O,~%_ ~ .J
'::_j:
g
\:
~
~- +.-
"
8 .
. i- >
~
I 8
I "
~
+
".",
i
- ~.
.
-'-I
;:;'-I.'i {i
d. I ~ ;:;1
? Q l, Q.
.~ l i ~ ~.
f s~.: - !'~., 'R ~
Ql ,... ~
. + -
1.<(1 <4/
'L,~:. ~'_- 1
.,";
'-j,'
. J-;:~"
--~.;-
--'--' --'
-f--
--..,
I
,
i
I
i
.j
I
\"
I
I
I
!
,
I
-, .
1:.
,.
I
r
I
,
\--
,'I. .
5--t22.00-P\1." .
. -~--.-:- !lC!7.4.!1,P\f~LF}':
, VC;-100.oo' ---l
"'1'0.13 I
""l' .i-
;--\
.).
I.
PARTRIDGE LANE
:;;: ~
g Iii'
~
w
";
-.--:-j -~"-
)
T'
I
"'t-
6+00
~
~
u
.
g
=
8 ~
g ~,
6 dl--
;
!
.1
,
"'T'
,
Q+oo
3
.'
~;
iii;
I
!
~.
. i1
!
H1-
i
"
I
"-"--,i-:-::-~~-'-
r ~
I
I
.1
1+ 0
-j:-
j'
i-'
I
T
8.
"
;1
,
-f-
.
. =.
df
Oi1
.i
I
,
,
~- --
,
; 'I:: ~
-V'"
I
,
i
i.
.-,.
,.
i
"1---
1.
~
.
o
.
~
;;
~~ ~
~_~ I-
0.9 ~
~8 ~
~g ~
-..; ~..
o
;;;
I'
,
'....,,\:. ---,(
'\I/' ,
"
.'"..
2..~5.oa PI/1 ,-
910.70 P\'l ELE'o\.
, . V(;~100.00' .' !
~..o.~s .
,
l'
,
-.,
-. ~ -
I
, .
T
(.,
I
I"
2+00
..
.ro;,
5;1'
I
--!,-" '
I
,
,
i
- ~ -'
I
I
i
I
'1
1
I
-J'
~ "
8 ~
l!! 11:;'
+ -
" .
I'
,
-,
i
3+00
~
G!:
-,
ti~
"'i
;;
J
\.50~
i" .
,.....:..---t :Ii {,J
.r g ~
;C ~0:3
r::. :~
.. 1'1;!
.., .......
I
.i
.. ~ --.
f
i
'!- --
I
COURT
MALLARD
.
.,
. -~:.
:
I
i
,
-1
~-'""--
i
;'
,
.1
,.
,
,
I
t'-.c
,
,
i
:
"
I
L-,
,
,
.,!--'
,
..'!
,..-.J
--I
".1
I
'('
1
1:1:'
~;
"'!
...."
~'
~,
i
J'.
l8i:.
,8L
.<11-!.
-I'
I
,
I
i
I
i
,
i
In ;oj N. l:'
,,.,.:. <#' I
I': ~8 '.'
'r- ...."', l'
i:
i
I'
..
,.
,
...-' ~:.~
, ,~ ! ~.:
..~..::.~,--=---~'i. -
" I'.
I
',-,
1-'
li,
i
-I
l.~ -', " :\ .,.
1':. ~ . ).' .
}~f.~,..,':" ~.,---+ ,-
i .' I
I ..;
=
.1
!
~,
~,
.Q>i'
i
i
I
'!"
!
!.
.~L
'(
>
~ ::J
~ ~
i i
-.
.
~
lil
.
,
!:,
,
.~,_.
!
,
,
t -
,
w+oo.do P\4 .
909.86 PIl1 ELEV.
VC"'l~;OQ'
j,l"O.12I
- "i....-
--
-->---
::I
h
< ..
q
o
.. .
i .i
9+00
,
I
.,
'1""
--,l
!' i
I
10+00
.1
,
--I"'
,
I
:\
!:
__:'1':'"
___l'
!
j,
t.-
4+00
.
~:
I
I
,..
\: ~
~ \:
o ~
- ~ ~
~ ~
"
-
::::
~',
.
"!:
;;:
.)
I
I
.L
-O.lJ:r
~;
.;
~ ~U
o ~ %
g ii13 "
<I !Ii: ~
~ ~
.':' a
,
~
"
",
.,
!i.,
;;;
m.
.1
~,
! ~
,.
-.1
,
i: ci
2 d
9 ~
.
g .
8 g--
+ ~
~ :l
o
.
!
"
e
I'
I
;
i- _ !.
-+-,- ----"
L
I
12+00
i
I
L
1+00
0+00
GROUSE
-,
> '
~ d
8
il ~
!: ~
&
,<;l-r'J:.
. ^
,--... "...,
~ ~ \i-- ----;-~;~fp:~::--~
g II:: ' IJC=IOOOO; ~
.~ ~ _,OJ. 0
~ is ' PRo::PQSEl) <Jt.o.l)E, ~
~ R eXISTING ~AOE ~ ~.
. m!i.
g !.; .;i ~
~ ,- Ii
I
I
,
I
I
925
920
915
910
,905
900
895
890
, 885
HOLLOW
"
0.501.:--
-'--:;;:;'00.00 'p..,
9Otl,38-:P'o\ ELiY.'
'1C_l00:00'
101-0.12:
PARTRIDGE PLACE
!
\"
-: ~-~ --.
j'
j
,
,
I
---,
j.
i
J
I
I
i
i-
'-t
,
,
I,
,
,
~.
~:
'l',
~:,
i
j I 1
jI)~O~ ~R~~
, f j : EXlSlINO dRADE ,
, -) ,
., "
l' :-, \ _ _~..;---c-i~--....,-l_~
:-r--~~-~" ,.~.,.,. T ,~.
~... i . .
.--t:~ 3 ,
- '-1'
:d
:~ l
,;
.-"
I
l'
{~
~ ~
~ .
~ ;i
g-
.::'
~,
~1,
>: ;,.: .
---.~ ':j-
o w
~ ~
-5 ::
t
.
,
--~-~--~--~.-
t . -. ,-.
f 12+00.00 P'd
i llGS.!l6 P'o1. MV: e;
. VC-100"OO' ~ d
~ "'..0.13(' 0. ~
..I. 8 l!,
~ =
~ 2
---
.,+
, ' I',
I
.-.- -~::. - - ... -~ (,-
!
11+00
I
i
':_L'.
,
i
"
2+00
~
~.
..
;;
&
L...
>
~
'8
d
~ ~
,&
~
,.
\: d
~ ~
8 ~
d "
~, ~
,
,
-'-'1"'
j
I
..j
I
13+00
of
>
..
Il!
d'
0:
I
I
i
i
Ie
I
,.~os '"
~
o
5
~
, ~
~ d
~ ;;
I
,
,j
I
,
.,'
i
,I.
;.-
14+00
925
920
915
910
905
900
895
890
885
880
.
(.)
c:
-
V>
~ Ei
-~ '"
-cr
==~
:I:.........
% .
~ii
. w
a: >z; 3~
~,; ...
en W ",ij
Q) ;;;-; t
~ ffi e~
~ z .~
ca~kw
~~U
~..----,._'
. !\
('----:7)
'-----"
i )d
i~ii~i
-d.~Sct;~
~!.~$Sa
i~iht.l'
H~;'ii:~
."l<i'
'2,t:;_.!' J!
}~H~~3
_ j- 3.<5 ~",,,,
I
I
i
, .
! j
I'
l,g
.~
(J%
:z: "
;r: -'
rn ....~
[Q r.iI :z: %
<-c:~ ~~
;::;l~~ ~8
~ l>:: S~
~~p.,~~~
<('.... rzliil
~~fj Q~
...........0:: a::-
~o E- Q>-
;r: 00 :z:~
0.. :;:>>
05
a:;c
oil
.
,
~
DRAwN BY
PLJ
OAT>:
10/26/00
RE\JlSlONS
90Ql(/PAGE
CAD FILE:
20237PRF
PROJECT NO.
202J7
FILE NO.
SHEET 7 OF 8
930
-.
925
920
915
910
905
900
895
890
885
0+00
.
. $:
m,
~: oJ'
.' ji;j
'.'1 , i
I
i
, "
I ,
~
.
.
o
.
:~
'.
2+00.oQ PVI
912.~7 P'-' (LEV;
I ~",lOO:OO'
"EXISTlHG -CRjiJjE "'''O.1~'--
,
'o.~"
;:':-L-,-,,~
:;; 0 -- " "
< ~i
~ 0 , 0
u . d . ,
z ~ ~ e if; "S: d
8 , . ~ . . s:
m 0 8 . 8 ;:i
a ltlr- ~ ; !' 8 "
.; ~ ~ ~
8 -. . oJ ;': N'
. ' ;': . ~,.i' .
- 6 ~'i- mo. ..l'I Ii
, , !.
1+00
2+00
MALLARD
~n"~/'nnn .~.~O.'L 'n'~7DDC
~f " ~i ~ . ~, ~ .
~; . . . ,~,
,"", ~! "-;' ~;
~i .' .' Ciii Cij; 0'
, "'I
i i
! '" I :
i s: ,
, " ~ U , . d
~ ,Z ~ d 8
~ 0 d ,
I< . 0 "
. , 0 I< . .
. z ii ~
"S 0 " .
" . . ;l; 0 "
" . ~ g .
. .
~ ,;
"
. "t-
\.!:IO% ,
O.SO,.
-0.931(
2+99,09 PYI
911.65 p~ ELEV.
VC-100.00'
/of-O,"
I
r-
i
WAY
~_....-_.~.--'.-
hOo.OO P'y1""'~-:1
912,15 P'.1 El.!V'- I
VC:"'OO,OO' ' I,
M"O,l~
Iii:
> ,
~S
00
..
~i
, ,
.0
~ :;;2"
I ~~
-'.~ ~
'"$ ~.
.
-.-~'- -.
HOO
5+00
PROPOsfO" GRIIOE
..~
U
o
5
.
" ,
~ ~
,
_n.
e ~
. 0
8 .
z ~
p
~ ~<O
8 G "!
6 ~ g
,
0+00
u >
11: ct
g: ~
~ .
. ~,
~
0.::.0"
---+---
l+OOooPvi_-:-~
908.10 PVlELEV.
Vc-lOOiOO'
101=0.11;
~i
.
0'
"
i
,
,
.
.,
8'
.:
_.1.-
.j.;.
f
:
"
~ ~
o d
o ,
g q..
;': ~
S
.
1_50"",,';'
1+00
2+00
QUAL COURT
i
i
.J
930
925
920
915
910
905
900
895
890
885
<->
~V>
- ~~
_':!i "
'" Z .
-m3i:r
::I: '- i ~
g?Je
~ "
a:~E~
~ ~ or
!.I ._:;>
'- :: ~
K! ~ ~
~~~
:5 ;;; ~
"- ~ <
en
Q,)
E
a:s
-:l
~--~~"
( ,_.__J
". ."
""-....--/
wm!
d,,'uti
HIHli
,
,
3
~
.~
uz
:z "
::r: ->
Ul fI) ... ~
P:: r.:I :z~
<..c;....l ~~
~~E:: ~g
z 0 ...... .
~~ 0:: 3~
~ ,p.~~"
:z..... ... ....
<C ~ E-< ~
(I)~ ~ ~~
<tla:: '"
Pil ... Q>
::r: fI) :z ~
p., ;:>>
03
~g
.
,
o
,
DRAWN BY
pLJ
DATE
10/26/00
REVISIONS
BOOK/pAGE
CAD FILE
202J7PRF
PROJECT NO.
20237
FILE NO,
SHEET 8 Of 8
~
"'00
"-..,
'.1
------IJ
I
I
I
_.J
'II ,,,,T':-;:l('" 'if
rlvl'<IILI\....)_
"Cl^.' ::-'
"\nll....;
~---,
~~ I
(,'l I
(,'l
() '<-:'1
u::: ('J I ~~
( ) "- I~?
:::::.. ,j..
(,'l ~~ I Cj
~j~ . [f~
'-- -' <( to]
f- ('i It;
~5 ~) If'~
:~ '-'1
------11
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
II
I I
II
II
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
tl
j II
. I
~c-=~~~C=F~ 8AI<S ~
',' \...\ // , \
,L.~. .':::.;"
,-""",:,~ ,-,,~'c.t, '.
I'r_-" "'=.-D A^ 1,'::-'
'-'I._''''L_I\ vn(\....)
"-
, "
,
1---------1
/ ,:-"1'':-::)'''1"'\", I
L_I\'-'L' .'VI'II
2
';!.
y'
,~
:~.
, AREA_3.67,AC
.0_..-7.69 ~S
e
/~
.... _.\:;W
"',..u.-
AR(A-9.96. A
Q_..F22.4ffC S
e',~:
-""':
'. ,~~:\
\..""
., '
1
"-
,,/
. /
e'/-
AREA=14.3 AC
Q_ -"",23.99 CF'S
1__: 0.......67.31 ~S
\
I
r
; ~~ . '"
..... ~ _ ~-~ AREA_18.44 AC
t......,. ~ ~~ ~l 0101....30,:33 CfS
F ~&>'"" "--- ,- ..."""'" ._W: i::::\
t~- -- -" - ....., ~
I' ;-."" .~. .-
~: ';C~5~:~;f,;~~~:'~,~.,.:~,"'~" '.
lCISllNGDflAINAGE \ 1 .., ,jL -,,'\.
tMTOl \; ~. ,'" ~...: o.:~'O. '- ...J"
;' .... ,.. ..... A
"""" "'~ '"
~ I
:1
I
. ,
Q_~3
1200;1
lCIS....GDll......a:
.~
v....
..,...
~~"'.
i\
"
I
I
i.
$;.,. .....
~.
.0:;,
e
AREA-Z.39 AC
. Q_.....~68 Cf'S
"
"
" 2
'i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
rJ
I
I
I
I
I
JDS'TIN(lDRAINA(:E
O"C><
--'AREA=23.33 AC
0.. .....38.66 CfS
e
.._~-~.-
2E~~-;-EF~ CA~<S. 2
I
^' '"'T'"I ""'TI
vur^~_vr I
n I.
I
I
I
I
-
~'
"-",'0
/i,,,,,
~~'\-
<, ;'-" ":..:-. -.
~. .",;-~ ....;"\..;1:;:. :~J. "'''''
I: .
.""'... """~
..i\ _-'" .~
~.' .'~ *....
'.' '.
\- . .-,
,.. .
...\ ...
'~~xi. "
"'.\.~
-'.' '.
-,,"
~"'" .""' ..",. ~.'"
.... """,.
~~:;~.-
W<EI!I!
o
+'00.00
o
tX1STING ELECTRIC SOX
EXISTING SPOT ELEVA nON
EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE
EXISTING ~TlAND
0 EXISTING GRAVEL SURf" ACE
I EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE N
EXISTING FENCE
* 0 EXlSTlNG TREE UNE/TREES
EXISTING CONTOUR
t EXISTING WATERMAIN
0 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
~ POND AREA
12001 REACH
SCAlE"'F"[ET
0 '00 '00 JDO
e n
SueCATCHUENT InctI_IOOlftt
.
(.)
C::::U1
_ 0: ~
~~
-~ ~
=g5~~
:E ~ Ii
-gjg;
CC:z-~
rn~
.,,, I.LJ .~
V# "' " ~
Q)U1.l11<
E a:::: J:~
~~e.
caZ::II:~
:5 !l i'j
~ "--~
~
,...~d II
~.',h t
~ .~=.!!:
Ii~" a ~
hIlS~i.!! It
i'bElh! I
!~;ItH
m!~!' I.>
~iU~fi
,
~
~
.~
t)z
:c ~~
~ I'ol e-o<
< ~ z>
~~~ ~I
~ Q:: ~
~~Cl~~~
<.~ :>~
~~~ r:J~
J:il ~ e~
~ l'z:l s~
lJ,., oz
~H
DRAWN BY
TOL
OATE
10/26/00
REVISIONS
CAD F1L.E
2D237ED
PROJECT NO.
20237
SHEET 1 OF 2
~
~
,
~
, ,I
I I
I :
,
! :
I. I
I
I I
I '
I !
I '
I !
'i ,,, I I i
'I,' 'i I "" ,,", ".",' , : Ir J : ,I
'II ......l_l~ I L_I\ vnl'''; , '
I " I '
: IiI!: z/ ,.\. >, '. [n " ".E:IC'P"O""',~:, ',,1;rn i; : '''''': ~ O~KS ~ i ',J, J! , ,:;':~,~~':F~ ~,;:<s ,2 : : I
"" "" ~~:d ,,",>2,,'... " "~,,,},II;6: ,.}I ;~ I 'ti, i; !/r, : ,~ < ' : ~i '+, I I; I ., i,~t .+ :O"~IO'!
HV"") ~I ',' S. ~ kg [ "J@ / ( f I( \- J 1/ ,"" ~" ",' !' /~;, '", .",-L
-;-Fi,;:~:::' l:"~ . y...~.~.:\". 0 CJ r"..:J\' li Y ILC "\ I AR'~3'?~U~ / /.../ .
_- ~ '. I '.. '1,;" '" 'C/ -:;::J L/!l ....---t-' --- -~- - !It-L'in.
.. ' ,-=-..~ _'<-, --'-- I---~ lit
(/) I 'f, I .. Q.: i / "\\.. '.:.' '.. Q.A.~;gi54.'" = . I · "",
~;~iin ,'glt{g;' : ' "~,,':::.o\. Lc- Jl\\~~'~~~~~ ,~~ \~\ ~\ \\
" "," L ,) / '0. '\: ,,,J ~e', = ',' '\l\\1~" / '! ~ '----'I...:r ' , \.- ,j'
H ~"1m ~ ~.L~>." . f ~ ~~_ w.... r)\\J., ;11~;\S~ v/f'V~_/_,' r\v\';
" "" ' "I ::";..'11 g; ,I ";, -W(( "" ~' <l' ,,/ ~1Jfk:;, ,<,J' "I ..... ='f' ! '
-n \ ,1~;:~_;~f-:"".~'8':S \i~l 'Il I 7/'-( ~ , ' , ,~, ,L " ,?' /r """''''-., ,\,,~,\:
I I I 1\ 7 ~ d~ .-' ;. \ Y:: ,- --' -,
j"J" I~~q; ~~,' ,I~ ,eL ;l~\~ ~!I.~"" ,,'" '. ~-.~~),
Q~--:30.tFS~1"'~~'o-o21t'i.-8!;:- c::::J ful L(I<L: ~ /. ff '~
{;;,i : ~~C~i~ll"'" ~ . ~~I'~Z.i::;iiljj; ~
'ij , ~" ';r "A K'...." ~ eOO'AA~
: 1IIIg~~_ '1 . ~ l~~ ~A _,:\~~'- ,,~)\,\/ 12001 REACH
I I "'-.:: 'c._('t/J'x,~//J\~~1f;f;)','Y'. '--..;;> l ~ '
II "'~' -.' \;I';~' . ~~~'\ ~'/- -
,I qCJCJc=J '.')I[~ .... ~'''''3.04~b--::::'~VJ'\,....
I I q ,. ~ e.~...1.2' crs ~ ----.
--__-L~ '/ '--::.-- .~/:S: - .'y .....
._'''~ // ':1' . n I ,/ "-,,-,,---,,-,,
Q~...23." CF'5/ ~_."f I
e ..~-
..
I
/'0
e
J
,
I
I
,
I
,
,
I
,
,
I
,
I
N:
I
,
,
I
I
_h____n_______________________________n_~ i____
SUBCA TCHlAENT
.
~
SCALElNf'EET
00. '"
JOO
.
1 indI _ 100'HI.
, "~lIS I
..E~'_
....t.
1.1:5-11 ..
h.~i';:;d t
..1i151 IE
fiiiiU I
"'r~~ra I
Ili"'l ,
_ d..sili a
~
~
. ~
Uz
::r: 2S~
rn I'il f-' ~
0; z::i
~I~ ~~
Si~~~;
~i~ ~~
I"l p.. ~>
::r: 0 ~
,., l:l: >
~ p.. oz
~w
c:>~
~
~
DRA.WN e't'
TO\.
QATE
10/26/00
RE\ASlONS
CAD nLE
20237PO
PROJECT NO.
20237
SHEET 2 OF 2
Daua for CENTERVILLE EX. DRAINAGE 10-24-00
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by James R.Hill, Inc.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000744 ecl 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 1
,
26 Oct 00
WATERSHED ROUTING ~============================================================
~
/ ~
e r 0)
~G-G
1
e
G
G
e
OSUBCATCHMENT D REACH
6. POND
CJ LINK
SUBCATCHMENT 100 AREA DRAINING TO DITCH ON CENTERVILLE ROAD ->
SUBCATCHMENT 110 = AREA DRAINING TO NORTHWEST CORNER -> REACH 210
SUBCATCHMENT 120 = NORTHEAST PART FLOWING OFF SITE TO SOUTH ->
SUBCATCHMENT 130 AREA DRAINING OFF SITE TO EAST (SOUTH) ->
SUBCATCHMENT 140 = -> REACH 200
SUB CATCHMENT 200 OFF SITE FLOWING TO SOUTH LINE -> REACH 200
SUBCATCHMENT 210 = OFF SITE TO WEST FLOWING TO DITCH -> REACH 210
REACH 200 = NORTH-SOUTH DITCH -> REACH 210
REACH 210 ->
Data for CENTERVILLE EX. DRAINAGE 10-24-00
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by James R.Hill, Inc.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000744 ec) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 2
,
26 Oct 00
SUBCATCHMENT 100
AREA DRAINING TO DITCH ON CENTERVILLE ROAD
PEAK= 5.28 CFS @ 12.24 HRS, VOLUME=
.55 AF
ACRES
.42
.10
1.81
2.33
CN
8B
98
65
71
WETLAND TYPE D SOILS
BLACKTOP
UPLAND/OPEN MEADOW
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method
CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD
L=600' s=.007 'I'
Comment
Segment ID:
Tc (min)
32.8
SUBCATCHMENT 110
AREA DRAINING TO NORTBlfEST CORNER
PEAK= 30.33 CFS @ 12.39 HRS, VOLUME= 3.91 AF
ACRES CN
3.36 BB WETLAND
2.78 60 WOODS
12.30 65 UPLAND/OPEN MEADOW
IB.44 6B
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24 -HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method
CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD
L=1l70' 5=.0133 'I'
Conunent
Segment ID:
To (minl
44.0
SUBCATCHMENT 120
NORTHEAST PART FLOWING OFF SITE TO SOUTH
PEAK= 38.66 CFS @ 12.51 HRS, VOLUME= 5.66 AF
ACRES CN SCS TR-20 METHOD
7.26 BB WETLAND TYPE II 24-HOUR
.63 60 WOODS RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
13.21 65 UPLAND/OPEN MEADOW SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
.31 98 IMPERVIOUS
1.92 61 GRASS
23.33 72
Method
CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD
L=1700' 5=.0129 'I'
Conunent
Segment ID:
Tc (min I
54.0
Data for CENTERVILLE EX. DRAINAGE 10-24-00
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL- 5.90 IN
prepared by James R.Hill, Inc.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000744 Ie) 1986-1999 Aoolied Microcomouter Systems
page 3
.
26 Oct 00
SUBCATCHMENT 130
AREA DRAINING OFF SITE TO EAST (SOUTH)
PEAK= 5.68 CFS @ 12.10 HRS, VOLUME=
.45 AF
ACRES CN
.09 88
.65 60
1. 65 65
2.39 65
WETLAND
WOODS
UPLAND/OPEN MEADOW
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN~ 0-40 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method
CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD
L=370' 5=.0111 'I'
Comment
Tc (min)
20.7
SUBCATCHMENT 140
PEAK= 22.45 CFS @ 12.15 HRS, VOLUME= 2.04 AF
ACRES CN
1.30 88 WETLAND
1.77 60 WOODS
6.89 65 UPLAND/OPEN MEADOW
9.96 67
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN~ 0-40 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method
CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD
L=550' s=.0125 'I'
Comment
Segment 10.
Te (min)
25.5
SUBCATCHMENT 200
OFF SITE FLOWING TO SOUTH LINE
PEAK= 23.99 CFS @ 12.29 HRS, VOLUME= 2.72 AF
ACRES
14.30
CN
65
OPEN MEADOW
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt~.l HRS
Method
CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD
L=500' 5=.01 'I'
RECT/VEE/TRAP CHANNEL
W=2' 0=2.5' SS= .25 'I'
s=.0015 'I' n=.05 V=1.39
Comment
Segment ID.
Tc (min)
27.8
a=30
fps
Segment ID.
sq-ft Pw=22.6' r=1.327'
L=650' Capacity=41.7 cis
7.8
Total Length= 1150 ft
Total Tc=
35.6
Da~a for CENTERVILLE EX. DRAINAGE 10-24-00
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by James R.Hi11, Inc.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000744 leI 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 4
26 Oct 00
SUBCATCHMENT 210
OFF SITE TO WEST FLOWING TO DITCH
PEAK= 7.69 CFS @ 12.08 HRS, VOLUME=
.59 AF
ACRES
2.75
.92
3.67
CN
60 WOODS
65 OPEN MEADOW
61
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
Method
CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD
L=375' s=.0182 'j'
Comment
Segment ID:
Tc lmin 1
18.1
Da-ta for
,
Prepared
HvdroCAD
REACH 200
CENTERVILLE EX. DRAINAGE 10-24-00
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
by James R.Hill, Inc.
5.11 000744 Cc) 1986-1999 Acclied
NORTH-SOUTH DITCH
Qin = 44.68 CFS @ 12.21 HRS,
Qout= 38.96 CFS @ 12.49 HRS,
DEPTH
CFT)
0.00
.25
.50
.75
1.08
1.50
2.00
2.50
REACH 210
END AREA
CSO-FT)
0.00
.86
2.18
3.96
6.97
12.08
19.81
29.40
DISCH
(CFSl
0.00
.33
1.23
2.79
6.01
12.60
24.46
41.45
VOLUME=
VOLUME=
4.75 AF
4.75 AF,
2.5' x 2.5' CHANNEL
SIDE SLOPE= .27 'I'
n= .05
LENGTH= 735 FT
SLOPE= .0015 FT/FT
Qin = 70.64 CFS @ 12.44 HRS,
Qout= 67.31 CFS @ 12.64 HRS,
DEPTH
CFTl
0.00
.25
.50
.75
1.08
1.50
2.00
2.50
END AREA
CSO-FTl
0.00
.98
2.43
4.33
7.51
12.83
20.81
30.65
DISCH
(CFSl
0.00
.39
1.40
3.12
6.60
13.61
26.06
43.76
VOLUME=
VOLUME=
9.26 AF
9.26 AF,
3' x 2.5' CHANNEL
SIDE SLOPE= .27 'I'
n= .05
LENGTH= 585 FT
SLOPE= .0015 FT/FT
Microcomouter Systems
ATTEN= 13%,
LAG=
STOR-IND+TRANS
PEAK DEPTH=
PEAK VELOCITY=
TRAVEL TIME =
SPAN= 0-40 HRS,
ATTEN=
5%,
LAG=
STOR-IND+TRANS
PEAK DEPTH=
PEAK VELOCITY=
TRAVEL TIME =
SPAN= 0-40 HRS,
Page 5
26 Oct 00
16 . 5 MIN
METHOD
2.44 FT
1. 4 FPS
8.8 MIN
dt=.l HRS
11. 9 MIN
METHOD
3.16 FT
1. 5 FPS
6.3 MIN
dt=.l HRS
Data for CENTERVILLE PROP DRAINAGE 10-24-00
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALLz 5.90 IN
Prepared by James R.Hil1, Inc.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000744 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
#
Page 1
26 Oct 00
WATERSHED ROUTING ===~==================================e======================
~ 8_____
G /T e
91
e ~_____G
r\ e
~"--
G e
o SUBCATCHMENT 0 REACH
M--7M
~ !
<3
e
SUBCATCHMENT 100 -> POND 100
SUBCATCHMENT 110 -> POND 110
SUBCATCHMENT 120 z -> POND 120
SUBCATCHMENT 130 -> POND 130
SUB CATCHMENT 150 -> REACH 210
SUBCATCHMENT 160 z ->
SUBCATCHMENT 170 z ->
SUBCATCHMENT 180 ; -> REACH 210
SUBCATCHMENT 190 z ->
SUBCATCHMENT 200 ; OFF SITE FLOWING TO SOUTH LINE -> POND 110
SUBCATCHMENT 210 z OFF SITE TO WEST FLOWING TO DITCH -> REACH 210
REACH 210 ; NORTH SOUTH DITCH ->
POND 100 = -> POND 11 0
POND llO = -> REACH 210
POND 120 = -> POND 130
POND 130 = ->
~ ~-_._---- - --.-----.---
6. POND
CJ LINK
.
Data for CENTERVILLE PROP DRAINAGE 10-24-00
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by James R.Hill, Inc.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000744 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 2
26 Oct 00
SUBCATCHMENT 100
PEAK= 13.04 CFS @ 12.09 HRS, VOLUME= 1.00 AF
ACRES
.89
.44
2.55
3.88
CN
98
98
61
74
IMPERVIOUS
OPEN WATER
GRASS
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
TR-5S SHEET FLOW
Grass: Dense n=.24
L=120'
Comment
ROOF TO
Segment
P2=2.7 in
GROUND
ID:
s=.02 '/'
Tc (min)
2.0
18.0
Total Length= 120 ft
Total Tc~
20.0
SUBCATCHMENT 110
PEAK= 40.14 CFS @ 12.04 HRS, VOLUME= 2.83 AF
ACRES CN
3.12 98 IMPERVIOUS
1. 26 98 OPEN WATER
5.64 61 GRASS
10.02 77
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
TR-SS SHEET FLOW
Grass: Dense n=.24
DIRECT ENTRY
CIRCULAR CHANNEL
18" Diameter a=1.77
s=.005 '/' n=.013
L~70'
Comment
ROOF TO GROUND
Segment ID:
P2=2.7 in s=.02 '/'
GUTTER FLOW @ 3 FPS
Segment ID:
Pw=4.7' r=.375'
fps L~360' Capacity=7.4
Tc Cminl
2.0
11. 7
1.5
1.4
sq-ft
V=4.2
cfs
Total Length= 430 ft
Total Tc=
16.6
Data for CENTERVILLE PROP DRAINAGE 10-24-00
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by James R.Hill, Inc.
HydroCAD 5.11 000744 Ic) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 3
26 Oct 00
SUBCATCHMENT 120
PEAK= 33.55 CFS @ 12.05 HRS, VOLUME= 2.42 AF
ACRES CN
2.53 98 IMPERVIOUS
1.17 98 OPEN WATER
4.87 61 GRASS
8.57 77
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
TR-55 SHEET FLOW
Grass: Dense n=.24
DIRECT ENTRY
CIRCULAR CHAIlHEL
18" Diameter a~1. 77
8=.005 'I' n=.013
L=70'
Conunent
ROOF TO GROUND
Segment ID:
P2=2.7 in s=.02 'I'
GUTTER FLOW @ 3 FPS
Segment 10:
Pw=4.7' r=.375'
fps L=330' Capacity=7.4
Tc {min}
2.0
11.7
2.3
1.3
sq-ft
V=4.2
cfs
Total Length= 400 ft
Total Tc=
17.3
SUBCATCHMENT 130
PEAK= 37.13 CFS @ 12.09 HRS, VOLUME= 2.88 AF
ACRES
2.59
.45
9.62
12.66
CN
98
98
61
70
IMPERVIOUS
OPEN WATER
GRASS
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt~.l HRS
Method Comment
DIRECT ENTRY ROOF TO GROUND
TR-55 SHEET FLOW Segment 1D:
Grass: Dense n~.24 L=85' P2=2.7 in 8=.02 'I'
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW Segment 1D:
Grassed waterway KY~IS L=14S' 5=.02 'I' V=2.12 fps
CIRCULAR CHANNEL Segment 1D:
18" Diameter a=1.77 sq-ft Pw=4.7' r=.37S'
8=.005 'I' n=.013 V=4.2 fps L=850' Capacity=7.4 cfs
Tc {min I
2.0
13.6
1.1
3.4
Total Length= 1080 ft
Total Tc=
20.1
Data for CENTERVILLE PROP DRAINAGE 10-24-00
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
prepared by James R.Hi11, Inc.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000744 Ie) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Svstems
Page 4
26 Oct 00
SUBCATCHMENT 150
PEAK~ 33.48 CFS @ 12.01 HRS, VOLUME~ 2.14 AF
ACRES
.66
3.78
3.33
.27
8.04
CN
98 IMPERVIOUS
61 GRASS
88 WETLAND
60 WOODS
75
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN~ 0-40 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
Method
CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD
L~500' s~.0235 'j'
Comment
Segment ID:
Tc (min)
13.8
SUBCATCHMENT 160
PEAK= 3.04 CFS @ 11.88 HRS, VOLUME~
.14 AF
ACRES
.75
CN
65
OPEN MEADOW
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt~.1 HRS
Method
CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD
L=50' s=.05 'j'
Comment
Segment ID:
Tc (min)
2.0
SUBCATCHMENT 170
PEAK~ 3.22 CFS @ 12.23 HRS, VOLUME= .33 AF
ACRES CN
.14 98 IMPERVIOUS
.95 61 GRASS
.04 88 WETLAND
.56 65 WOODS
1.69 66
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL~ 5.90 IN
SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt~.1 HRS
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
TR-55 SHEET FLOW
Grass: Dense n=.24
L=230'
Comment
ROOF TO
Segment
P2=2.7 in
GROUND
ID:
s~.021
Tc (min)
2.0
29.7
'j'
Total Length= 230 ft
Total Tc=
31. 7
Data for CENTERVILLE PROP DRAINAGE 10-24-00
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by James R.Hill, Inc.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000744 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 5
26 Oct 00
SUBCATCHMENT 180
PEAK= 6.43 CFS @ 12.16 HRS, VOLUME= .59 AF
ACRES CN
.17 98 IMPERVIOUS
.85 88 WETLAND
1.25 61 GRASS
2.27 74
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
TR-55 SHEET FLOW
Grass: Dense n=.24
L=200'
Comment
ROOF TO
Segment
P2=2 . 7 in
GROUND
ID:
s=.025
Tc (min)
2.0
24.7
'/ '
Total Length= 200 ft
Total Tc~
26.7
SUBCATCHMENT 190
PEAK= 29.39 CFS @ 12.07 HRS, VOLUME= 2.21 AF
ACRES CN
.26 98 IMPERVIOUS
6.06 78 WETLAND WITH SOME WOODS
2.24 61 GRASS
8.56 74
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
Method
CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD
L=650' s=.02 'I'
Comment
Segment ID:
Tc (min I
19.0
SUBCATCHMENT 200
OFF SITE FLOWING TO SOUTH LINE
PEAK= 23.99 CFS @ 12.29 HRS, VOLUME= 2.72 AF
ACRES
14.30
CN
65
UPLAND/OPEN MEADOW
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method
CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD
L=500' s~.Ol 'I'
RECT/VEE/TRAP CHANNEL
W=2' D~2.5' S5= .25 'I'
s=.0015 'I' n=.05 V=1.39
Comment
Segment ID:
Tc (min)
27.8
a=30
fps
Segment ID:
sg-ft Pw=22.6' r=1.327'
L=650' Capacity=41.7 cfs
7.8
Total Length= 1150 ft
Total Tc~
35.6
I _
,
Data for CENTERVILLE PROP DRAINAGE 10-24-00
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL- 5.90 IN
Prepared by James R.Hill, Inc.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000744 (e\ 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 6
26 Oct 00
SUBCATCHMENT 210
OFF SITE TO WEST FLOWING TO DITCH
PEAK= 7.69 CFS @ 12.08 HRS, VOLUME=
.59 AF
ACRES
2.75
.92
3.67
CN
60
65
61
WOODS
OPEN MEADOW
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method
CURVE NUMBER (LAG) METHOD
L=375' s=.0182 'I'
Comment
Segment ID:
TC (min)
18.1
I
Data for CENTERVILLE PROP DRAINAGE 10-24-00
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL~ 5.90 IN
Prepared by James R.Hill, Inc.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000744 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Svstems
Page 7
26 Oct 00
REACH 210
NORTH SOUTH DITCH
Qin = 47.63 CFS @ 12.03 HRS, VOLUME= 9.51 AF
Qout= 40.02 CFS @ 12.24 HRS, VOLUME= 9.50 AF, ATTEN= 16%, LAG= 12.5 MIN
DEPTH END AREA DISCH
(FT) (SO-FTl (CFSl 3' x 2eS' CHANNEL STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD
0.00 0.00 0.00 SIDE SLOPE= .27 . I' PEAK DEPTH= 2.41 FT
.25 .98 .39 n= .05 PEAK VELOCITY= 1. 4 FPS
.50 2.43 1. 40 LENGTH= 585 FT TRAVEL TIME = 6.9 MIN
.75 4.33 3.12 SLOPE= .0015 FT/FT SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt= . 1 HRS
1.08 7.51 6.60
1.50 12.83 13.61
2.00 20.81 26.06
2.50 30.65 43.76
.
Data for CENTERVILLE PROP DRAINAGE 10-24-00
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL~ 5.90 IN
Prepared by James R.Hil1, Inc.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000744 Cc) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 8
26 Oct 00
POND 100
Qin =
Qout=
13.04 CFS @ 12.09 HRS,
1.24 CFS @ 13.11 HRS,
VOLUME=
VOLUME=
1. 00 AF
.92 AF,
ATTEN= 91%,
LAG=
61.5 MIN
ELEVATION AREA INe. STOR CUM.STOR STOR-IND METHOD
CFT) CAC) CAF) CAF) PEAK STORAGE = 3.24 AF
896.0 .04 0.00 0.00 PEAK ELEVATION= 907.2 FT
898.0 .08 .12 .12 FLOOD ELEVATION= 908.0 FT
900.0 .14 .22 .34 START ELEVATION= 906.5 FT
902.0 .22 .36 .70 SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt=.l HRS
904.0 .35 .57 1.27
906.0 .70 1.05 2.32
908.0 .87 1.57 3.89
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
906.5'
OUTLET DEVICES
12" CULVERT
n=.013 L=130' S=.005'/'
Ke=.5
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
POND 110
Qin =
Qout=
54.42 CFS @ 12.09 HRS,
4.84 CFS @ 14.63 HRS,
VOLUME=
VOLUME=
6.46 AF
6.19 AF,
ATTEN= 91%,
LAG=
152.3 MIN
ELEVATION AREA INC.STOR CUM. STOR STOR-IND METHOD
CFT) CAC) CAFI CAF) PEAK STORAGE = 6.21 AF
894.0 .10 0.00 0.00 PEAK ELEVATION= 907.2 FT
896.0 .15 .25 .25 FLOOD ELEVATION= 908.5 FT
898.0 .20 .35 .60 START ELEVATION= 904.7 FT
900.0 .25 .45 1. 05 SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt=.l HRS
902.0 .31 .56 1. 61 Tdet= 795.6 MIN (3.21 AF)
904.0 .40 .71 2.32
906.0 1. 47 1. 87 4.19
908.0 1. 93 3.40 7.59
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
904.7'
OUTLET DEVICES
15" CULVERT
n=.013 L=285' S=.0025'/'
Ke=.5 Cc=.9 Cd=.6
I __ _
."
Data for CENTERVILLE PROP DRAINAGE 10-24-00
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by James R.Hi1l, Inc.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000744 lcl 1966-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 9
26 Oct 00
POND 120
Qin
Qout=
33.55 CFS @ 12.05 HRS,
2.70 CFS @ 13.15 HRS,
VOLUME=
VOLUME=
2.42 AF
2.26 AF,
ATTEN= 92%,
LAG=
66.2 MIN
ELEVATION AREA INC.STOR CUM. STOR STOR-IND METHOD
1FT) lAC) IAFI IAF) PEAK STORAGE = 4.66 AF
894.0 .17 0.00 0.00 PEAK ELEVATION= 904.2 FT
896.0 .22 .39 .39 FLOOD ELEVATION= 907.0 FT
898.0 .29 .51 .90 START ELEVATION= 903.0 FT
900.0 .36 .65 1. 55 SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt=.l HRS
902.0 .44 .80 2.35
904.0 1. 51 1.95 4.30
906.0 1. 78 3.29 7.59
908.0 2.38 4.16 11. 75
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT OUTLET DEVICES
903.0' 12" CULVERT
n=.013 L=50' S=.005'/'
Ke=.5
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
POND 130
Qin = 38.86 CFS @ 12.10 HRS,
Qout= 6.31 CFS @ 13.15 HRS,
VOLUME=
VOLUME~
5.14 AF
5.04 AF,
ATTEN= 84%,
LAG=
63.4 MIN
ELEVATION AREA INC.STOR CUM.STOR STOR-IND METHOD
1FT) lAC) IAFI (AFI PEAK STORAGE = 4.05 AF
890.0 .08 0.00 0.00 PEAK ELEVATION= 903.0 FT
892.0 .13 .21 .21 FLOOD ELEVATION= 904.0 FT
894.0 .19 .32 .53 START ELEVATION= 900.5 FT
896.0 .26 .45 .98 SPAN= 0-40 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
898.0 .33 .59 1. 57 Tdet= 611.9 MIN {2.43 AF}
900.0 .45 .78 2.35
902.0 .59 1.04 3.39
904.0 .68 1.27 4.66
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT OUTLET DEVICES
900.5' 15" CULVERT
n=.013 L=150' S=.OOS'/'
Ke=.5
Cc=.9 Cd=.6
MEMO
DATE: November 9, 2000
TO Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Jim March
RE : Ordinance #4 Amendments
I...........................................................................
I would like to propose several amendments to Ordinance #4. The topics are as follows:
I) Address the minimum ground floor square footage required for new homes.
Currently we require a minimum ground floor area. We would like to amend the
ordinance to describe other scenarios such as total finished square footage for
when there are multi-level homes built.
2) Delete the language for comer lots having two front yards.
3) Creating the minimum and maximum garage size areas per district.
4) Defining when a site plan review is required. Currently site plan reviews for
remodeIings or building expansions do not come before the planning commission.
Is this ok or does the committee want review authority?
5) Adjusting side yard setbacks to 5 feet and accessory structure setbacks to six feet
from other structures to meet fire code.
I plan to have the specific proposed language for each amendment available at the
meeting, along with complete copies of the Ordinance for committee members. An
additional amendment will have to be made when the sign section of the ordinance is
deleted and re,rlaced with the new sign ordinance that we hope to have completed by
November 28 .
THE:
STANFORD MODEL
;v1.r'k'e I3vo fi r-
. ? 2. f- f Y ~ ?
60.- .> .
.
..
--
- -
~
"
.,.
-
-
ICi 10 I
IOD 00000000
[1[1 00000000
DODD DODD
00000000
-
j FRONT ELEV A T/ONi 1/'--""""
~ SDJT MSf ftDOR
jI(U SQ.Ft $ECCJN) f1DOR
1UZSlJ.1T. 1OJ'AL
UOOUU I
I
I
-I
,
I
.,
.
~ I
0. ,
~ ~
:::0 i
05 'I
utf
- ~'.
~"
O..!l .!
r- ~ ~
~~ ~ ..t
L> ~ i e
,.~. t 2
- - 0 .. :::
e:: ~ Oil
~: !
.
-0
.~
"
Q
.
~
:
..,
. .
tl -
-
.::::
"
"-
CI):
~ ..
<..
~~
.... ~
:<:;~
of
""l"
:<:; :
;;.:~
"" ~
"
5
..
"
.
. Q
- I S.L ~
.:.. 2~-96
~
.; HOTrD
e,- ,AVN.OH HOlIES we. I
:~~r ~
~...
~
-! LDiS~
'"
o
..
"I
~
o
..
'I
.., .
C'
'I
~~ :
i~ 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
...Jc\
I
I
I
I
I
I
J>-'< t J1-.i.Z
"Q-.n
..01-." 'I .
___ I
----
:/. l IW
r-
1..__
,....- - -
1 "Olir.il. ./ r-
I 7--"
I JhtRI!)~.
I "" :><:0
I .zIJll'.JP.J1"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I "!U.J P91
l"ni..&'~
L- Y7SJ" ~I
.0,-.6
J
111.../1..1...'
'..J,,'ll.o'l[
~.IJ
J>-"
..1-...1
.>
.~
~
"
~
C
"\
~.
"""'" <nJS/'
""""""
J -.7C':.z,.........
----
~~__ T-
____L__
i._I
,..--
"
-T-- -
..-..
.Il-.'-'
.z:-.{'".
-..
.lh.c
..11'-..1,
_.II:
--_J
,
I
I
I
I
J
I......:r~-~~ jj ~
1 ~,.. 01:--
.... ...:.U~
.., .... CII
. C
1 -"n~ft~ ~
\ (It :Ut:
~J~..:-~~:..i-
~, -.,
I.... ::'1. I
.~ :..1 ~
~~~~~=~ ~
. : "om I
I m I
1-_'._'"
.o-...l
I
I
I
I
I
I
L'
'--
''''~,.-.-yo,/._
.--/
"" ....
'JI'lB.lJ ~II
JIlfIJI'1
~,,/o .It .
"S.JSr OJq: ~
.JJ,-.~ ::;11
~ .ol-.r.l
-,.
~m ,
-d- 0. eIO..1'I.
~-
;11 "S..LSt" Olltl"~
a~ __
.
~'n ,~
-,.Dl-.n
J>-J.&
~
--
'iJ
\,. .
10. '
".
~
'"
o
"
"I
~
..
0,
..,
'0
~
1
&,.~
51
>1
/1.y ~
lfl710
LF f':..AiL
SF of" ~Ol= 1t--6
dl; ~'-- GA:Q..
,l;l ~U::_-~\)St:
l
n"-t'"
J....-HJ"
'tr4
'_I 1'-lJ" 3'~ 4'-j
'.Il" -I . '1' T-~
I . I
~c.wr. -)_ 'D'iOF'i I I _ fX;a'O r=; .ed
, ~~-.,.- - 7- .~" !I\:v I-;J.o~ 0 nxa::>
/,/r-fo~/.~.(!>' / / 1-;I.f)'6/)C.S '.,;10 ""0 C<
. 't ' , ' , ,
""",' '\. '\.
" '\. ',-.. '\. " " "III
...2'a sn..'Oll ,,'\. 1'~.B.B: TRSS"S .... II
~~cis-R:'\ " Wt" " . U'OIf J.,' '\. II
"'\. '\. '\. '\. ,'i;
'\. I '\. ~ '\. '\. '\. '\. ,,'11
L _ _.......~ ' m~
...--....... '.. SII1....RCIt....~ ',.~
'. " ~ *U3.(CLC:..... JI:s
'\. '\. '\. '\. li
.' ~.. ',1.', " ", " i&
~Y.AJJ101 ,- ',Jr" ~ :o..~'1t " ""1:
I '\. '\. .-FJ.a1R~' '\. ~
za...WISH '\. '\. '\. '\. " i
- ~ '\. " " " '\.~
"'-Jo<tT~J >.t.. ... " .,.,~ ~ lXl ,~ Is'OX7'O O-K. OR.
~ !" ~ ">"1"" '\.', ""U I
i ~~ii"~! "'",....."""...........'''''''.11 :
I : I
l~....~h I" 7..-"'~'~ I ."
~ ~I',J
iIDBl:rl=
'\ YMl. r..r'l-
1_:3031aS
. I J'....
~.-Jt,. J'-4' J..... ......
"""".... (2,lb'Q HOlt
...
Posr
SO_I. a'-If' ..-r
UI'-~ ~'-d
J:j'-.I"
174
.7
5,-,fT
, '
\,.
.
...
~
1
~
.
r" h ....uE or2H1.
1.1 FI.R.~~
I ."
-------- --
~ flrnR ~l
I . 240/C
::. 5"-'0" :r-/i :r-G'
"
,
....
..
I
1
I
;-
I
, ..
,
I "
ILMNG ROOM!
CAAf'U
,"""'=
~
CN<PU
...:::
"0
..
~
\ti.
\'
'-
"0
,
~
..
1Ut "'1'1.
S*D: twt ~,
!I -rj A'- r"',J I. I
.~ V....O/lt'
, ~o;; ~ ~~!~
y " : ."..... .-"
..;,,.,.,, ... I "" 2 smr. '-
=i ~HEN1 : z ) ~~ ;
'\
Q
,
~
~ '-
~
l,
.'
..
j /., .'07' 'Sri. C /
~ " .,.. r.' r"'''-/-;", / "
r--'--"-...I--"-oV...:..-"-......- _J.
7"~ 2.(' ClHT.
-
r,'4 2'-$"
CONC.
SlDtW'
,." >IlL /lIl.
./SIJ( u:
1;;'/1
104"-<1'
./
"'-<T
1.'-/1"
.......
17'-6'
l,
-!.
.
1:
~
IS
~
pARAGt:!
" CONC. stAB
'2-1.}.l'/
0'-((" a'-tr !'-<r 5'4
''1"-8' .tr-<T
2.,.-11"
- r~
. J
; C"/OC'T' C" r"lr'lO 0' A 10.11_ __ 5
,
Zl~
b
,
.:
, 0
. ,
~ 00
b
.'
,
$f'~
l..f'-(j
Il....r
"-'- #'
:Jr-<f"
"-6"
T-ur
Ir-r
..'--r. :1'"_
. ~-r
'-IT: ,.'-("
, ,
1-5< 'lost:.
~I~
,
~J-i.Y;jg }-,,~ n '1-40~LJPK.,'t.'fJtlf
~ ~ r;r IIF~
n I: ~r;::\
~ lIDHr -0
4'-8" 5'-1" ..f.....fr '"" ~ ~.:
. _._ _'- I OPDI 7D ..Ill:
=..~' 2'< "" " "'"' ..... ~'@) . l\ ~~
l ijll~~O G .-~ _: -Li? ~,.,,__o
~ 'N' ~'O "'_oJ... b m _
~~ -~~,~ ~ ~ n --b6~ ~
,,_ __ ..J ""'- .
li~ "'t.~"" ~ I-tc ~=bl
t J !R.= ,i>- . ~ flU<
~ ~ROOI.II <,.. Iqj ~ 1 J ~
b 'i ~ iEI
~l7<<iss l4 1/
~~;55a!=,!= pta!l!!!!!:; ;
J-3V-fC?S J-So'INII' J- 6'fD5~
::~I!!!E!!!_!~== ;
...... lJIW; <
t.. "
~fDROOI.II ~ ill
CN<Ff:I ;[""lJ Ii!!
t. - ~
2"'
~
i
u
'.
o?-JOy~: i .M .'
rr'-r r-lo"l ,~
'4'-0" 1.
:r-r
T-<f"
,,'....,r
.5"4
:r-r
,,--8"
,..'4
,
/-5o'/Co5L
~nu:
DlCC/SU'lR.
I,
-'
}.<IsrR. sum!
c.R'U
"
'"
tJ-30fl& 5 H
1r-r
-'-- .
~ NO FLOOR PLAN~I/"'.""'"
5IOf SlJJT.(SfNR$/OPCJI NIl:). lOT HCUOtlJ)
~
T-8'
-
b
,
~
~ .
o' b
:" -' -.;,
~
~
o
,
..
".-Itr
,
~.:-
'0/12 c;tBt.l
~ J2
;;;:l.
1 ,,'D\ >om~ d rn 0 OJ
II 12 ,
-!L ' ~.
:/ .... .....,
.... """"
~1 lill OJ CD OJ
, 1 \'Ml SlllN>
.......",...,
!RIGHT ELEVATfON[ 1/0"."4
I
I "
I ij
"'~;I
iI
I
I
. !
':'1:;
~I~
J/nac
.I
I
i,
....,J....,
BJ
\r1-;::;
, Ih'"
V -'I!:Ii
, ..,
V
!
.
.
IREAR ELEVATfON~ 1/0"-"4
RDOf' VDITS AS 1lm1l
"""""" S>-.s
a~_1Di:Si'-ElD
1$1 FI1 T P>>Ot
8ll smrn:..
/tit U'l'lIJlS. CA TRUSS
"
"""- .....,
-Rnr SIf7/fG.
bil SlLOS 0 ,r O/C
Rig r.c. SATT HilL
lIT l:l1".BO..
VAPOR .........
RaI$ Rig FoG. BArT N5U..
50< TO_
RDolS RI9 F.e. BATT ..svt..
,
o
50<10_
o~
.. ~mro. SIl..L wI
.
J LEFT ELEVA TfON t 1/0"-1"4
,
5/rCTP. so. w/VA . a.c.
'/TGrP. 8Q. w/V.A . IWLS
IH,""~l){IUI
Ilmm
I.
-,;
jtll-UkYJOIJI_ ti
.I a::.
~ ,-~
-=~ -:..
SlnM;
Ir FUt JJIUSSES
. 2.t" 0/1: .
f!lJBiilG:l
~
I.,;
-..
-"
..
~
,
,
...
- ,;
~"
, "
..
J ,n- 'ewe. SLo08 ,
, 1i!>aT
_..:.;, ii:w.u n, ,
.
ABSENT:
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 3, 2000
Pursuant to due caU and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Comm'
meeting on October 3, 2000, at 6:30 p. m.
PRESENT:
Commission Member Alan LaMotte
Commission Member David
Commission Member Ro S
Commission Membe
Commission M be
Commission be
Com . sion e be'
1.
II.
erson Hanson opened the public hearing at 6:33 p.m.
Mr. and Mrs. Stan Hasiak, 6994 Centerville Road, appeared before the committee and requested a
variance to enlarge the pole barn that currently exists on their property. Two percent (2%) of the
existing lot is 621 square feet. The existing shed greatly exceeds this amount. The existing building is
36' x 45'. Mr. Hasiak began constructing a "lean-to" addition to the north side of the pole barn of
approximately 8' x 24'. Mr. Hasiak would like to use the addition for more storage. Paul Palzer,
Building Official, issued a stop work order on the project and has also issued an order to remove the
interior improvements to the pole barn without proper permits being issued.
Commission Member McLean felt that he should remove himself from discussion in regards to this
matter due to the fact he is a neighbor of the Hasiaks.
Mrs. Hasiak stated several reasons for requesting a variance, they own eight (8) vehicles and would like
to enclose them in an attempt to enhance the appearance of their yard and give her husband space to
repair same. Mrs. Hasiak stated that they have little to no space available for storage and the existing
crawl space underneath the residential building can not be utilized due to foundation erosion and
Page 1 of 13
f
sewage/water backups. Mrs. Hasiak referred to a videotape in her possession that she wished to play for
the committee and stated that Mr. March had previously viewed same. Mr. March told the Committe
he had viewed the tape earlier in the day and noted that the condition of the home is a civil issue to be
handled with the previous property owner.
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers questioned Mrs. Hasiak as to why her situation was a special
circumstance that would warrant the granting of a variance. Ms. Hasiak stated that the building is
considered a non-conforming structure; however, they would like the opportunity to enjoy a garage and
have storage similar to a basement.
Mr. March stated he felt the criteria for granting a variance had been met in regards to the repairs on the
interior of the building; however, exterior adjustments or improvements should not be included. Mr.
March stated that other residents in the community have the opportunity to sheetrock, cement the floor
and insulate their garage space if so desired. Mr. March stated that the Hasiak's non-conforming
structure is much larger than most garages, which benefits the Hasiaks. Mr. March also noted that the
Hasiak's property is large enough to be split, hence two assessments for service stubs on their property.
Mr. March stated that the second special assessment placed on the Hasiak's property had been
previously deferred by Council for 10 years excluding interest.
Commission Member Brainard inquired if Mr. March believed the hardship requirement could be met.
Mr. March indicated the basement is not suitable for storage. The Planning and Zoning Commission
and the Council knew the building was there. The neighbors knew the building was there when they
moved in. He explained he feels allowing the improvements to the interior provided proper permits are
obtained would be agreeable to everyone. However, he expressed concern for allowing an enlargemen
to the building.
Commission Member McLean commented in the capacity of a neighbor rather than a Commission
Member. Mr. McLean indicated he did not have concerns with the interior improvements to the
building; however, he was concerned with the exterior improvements. Mr. McLean indicated that the
Hasiaks would benefit differently than any other resident of the community due to the fact that their
accessory structure currently is larger than allowable and others are exempt to building accessory
structures of similar size.
Mrs. Hasiak stated that their priority is to be allowed to complete the interior improvements.
Commission Member LaMotte questioned the location of the accessory structure versus the property
line. Mrs. Hasiak stated that the structure is approximately fourteen (14) feet from the property line.
Commission Member LaMotte stated that storage of automobiles is the responsibility of the owner not
the City. Mrs. Hasiak indicated she has three (3) antique cars and would like to store them inside the
structure.
Commission Member LaMotte questioned the Hasiaks whether they were capable of adding an attached
garage to the house. Mrs. Hasiak stated that the lot size did not allow for an attached garage.
Motion bv Commission Member DeVine. seconded bv Commission Member LaMotte. to continu
the public hearin!!: to the October 11. 2000. Citv Council Meetin!!: at 6:00 p.m. All in favo
Motion carried unanimouslv.
Chairperson Hanson closed the public hearing at 7:00 p.m.
Page 2 of 13
2. Salazar Fence
Chairperson Hanson opened the public hearing at 7:00 p.m.
Mr. and Mrs. Pedro Salazar appeared before the committee and requested a variance to be allowed to
construct a six (6) foot wooden privacy fence in their rear yard. The property is a comer lot located at
7336 Old Mill Road. According to Ordinance #4, the Salazars have two (2) front yards. The Salazars
would like a variance to leave the north side of the fence facing Old Mill Road located where they have
already dug the fence post-holes. These holes are approximately one (I) foot into the road right-of-way.
Construction was begun without a variance and a Stop Work Order was issued on the project.
Mr. Salazar stated that he had contacted Paul Palzer, Building Official and questioned the positioning of
the fence and was told twelve (12) to fourteen (14) feet from the curb. He then split the difference and
installed the fence post-holes 13 feet from the curb. He stated the project was a three-step process
involving grading the lot, sprinkler system and the fence. He has the comer holes in and if he were
required to move them they would interfere with where the sprinkler system has been installed.
Commission Member LaMotte questioned the distance from the fence to the sidewalk. Mr. Salazar
stated approximately one (I) foot.
Commission Member Brainard questioned if Mr. Salazar was told he would not need a permit. Mr.
Salazar stated he was told if the fence was kept under six (6) feet he would not need a permit.
Commission Member Kilian questioned the distance between the curb and the fence. Mr. Salazar stated
approximately thirteen (13) feet.
Mr. Salazar explained that he has waited over a month to continue work on the fence and would like to
complete the project prior to the ground freezing.
Commission Member McLean questioned if the six (6) foot fence would cause visual obstruction. Mr.
March stated that the fence would not extend beyond the comer of the garage so visibility is not an
Issue.
Commission Member DeVine questioned Mr. Paul Palzer whether he remembered speaking to Mr.
Salazar. Mr. Palzer stated he did recall speaking to Mr. Salazar; however, the project was started three
months prior to the conversation. Mr. Patzer indicated he had stated, "twelve (12) to fourteen (14) feet
is typical". However, in this case the City right-of-way ends at thirteen (13) feet, eight (8) inches due to
the fact the street is not centered. Mr. Palzer stated his opposition to leaving the fence in the City right-
of-way.
Commission Member Brainerd questioned Mr. Palzer as to what his opposition was. Mr. Palzer stated
that there could be problems with snow plowing or if in the future the City needed to enter the right-of-
way. If entering the right-of-way necessitates the removal of any or part ofthe fence it would be done at
the property owners expense.
Commission Member Brainard questioned whether Council had informed Mr. Salazar he needed a six
(6) foot fence. Mr. Salazar stated he wished to go beyond City requirement to ensure the safety and
comfort of the neighbors and to provide a proper exercise area for the dogs. Mr. Salazar stated he felt it
Page 3 of 13
was the responsibility of the City to tell him he was placing the fence in the wrong place prior to him
getting this far along in the process because the City knew he was building the fence.
Chairperson Hanson questioned as to how he arrived at starting the fence at thirteen (13) feet from the
curb. Mr. Salazar indicated he used thirteen (13) feet because it is between twelve (12) and fourteen
(14) feet.
Commission Member DeVine spoke as a neighbor of the Salazars and indicated he is in favor of the
fence. Mr. DeVine stated he had spoken to another neighbor who voiced her support of the fence. Mr.
DeVine also stated he does not believe one (I) foot either way will make very much difference.
Commission Member Kilian agreed one (1) foot is not a big difference. Mr. Kilian stated he would like
it to be made clear, however, if the fence stays in the City right-of-way and the City needs to remove it
for any reason it would be the responsibility of the Salazars to repair and replace it at their expense. Mr.
Salazar expressed his willingness to agree to repair and replace the fence, at his cost, should the need
arise if the City needs access to the right-of-way or if the fence is hit by the snowplow.
Commission Member Brainard noted it is not the responsibility of the City to survey a property or
determine for the property owner where the lot lines exist. He indicated the City can give guidance, but
it is ultimately the responsibility of the property owner. Mr. Salazar said he believed he should be able
to rely upon information received from the City.
Commission Member DeVine stated he does not think it is right to call City Hall and get information as
to where the fence should be placed and then have the City place a stop order on work because th
information given out was incorrect and the fence is now in the City right-of-way. Mr. Palzer notel
there was a three month time period between the telephone call and the start of the project. Mr. Salazar
indicated he was waiting for an available contractor to begin the project.
Mr. March eXplained to the Commission he had sent out a certified letter as follow-up to Mr. Salazar's
appearance before the Council on the dog issue. In that letter it informed the Salazars that a variance
may be required to build a fence. The certified letter was refused by the Salazars and returned by the
post office as undeliverable. The letter was then delivered by the Centennial Lakes Police Department.
At that time period, construction of the fence had already begun. Mr. March indicated that the City had
tried to preempt the current situation by sending the letter and that by not accepting the letter; the
Salazars have created the current situation.
Mr. March stated he believed the fence would be an amenity to the property and would not detract from
it. Mr. March stated that the current Ordinance #4 needs to more clearly define front yards pertaining to
comer lots. Mr. March also stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission would be discussing this
issue in the near future and at present the concern is the placement of the fence in the right-of-way.
Motion by Commission Member DeVine. seconded by Commission Member Brainard to continue
the public hearin!! to the October 11. 2000 City Council Meetin!! at 6:00 p.m. All in favor. Motion
carried unanimously.
Mr. Salazar presented to Mr. March letters of support for the fence from two (2) of his neighbors.
Chairperson Hanson closed the public hearing at 7:20 p.m.
3. County Bank
Page 4 of 13
Chairperson Hanson opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m.
County Bank is requesting a variance for their proposed sign to be located at the northwest corner of the
intersection of Main Street and 21st Avenue. Craig Bode, Branch Manager, and Dave Shannon of Color
Sign were in attendance. The variance request is for a larger and taller sign than Ordinance #4 permits.
A new schematic for the sign was presented and the revised schematic showed a two (2) foot taller sign
than originally proposed, along with an instant cash sign below the main sign. The proposed sign would
be approximately 26.58 feet tall and 211 square feet in size. Ordinance #4 requires a maximum height
of twenty (20) feet and eighty (80) square feet in size for a free standing sign in a commercial district.
The variance request includes a time and temperature reader board, which is currently not allowed by
Ordinance #4.
Commission Member DeVine indicated there are proposed amendments to Ordinance #4 allowing
message reader signs and to increase the size of the signs based on the frontage of the property in order
for Centerville to compete with Lino Lakes.
Mr. March questioned if there was a way the bank could provide a frame of reference as to how the sign
would look with the building. Mr. Shannon indicated the Amoco sign was approximately two hundred
fifty (250) square feet and thirty-five (35) feet high. County Bank is proposing a sign that would be nine
(9) feet shorter and fifty (50) square feet smaller. Mr. Shannon stated that it would be very difficult to
incorporate the copy and logo on a smaller sign.
Commission Member Kilian stated that based on the location of the sign to the building, he believed it
would look proportionate.
Commission Member LaMotte inquired as to why the bank is applying for a variance at this point when
Ordinance #4 is to be revised. Mr. Shannon indicated the need to place the footings in the ground prior
to the ground freezing. Mr. Shannon stated that the permanent bank building would be open February I,
200 I and that they desired to have the sign up by then.
Commission Member Brainard questioned whether Ordinance #4 could be modified rather than granting
a variance. Mr. March stated that County Bank did not want to apply for a variance after the ordinance
was revised if their sign ended up being larger than the requirementg subsequent to amendments. Mr.
March stated that the sign ordinance is rather lengthy and would require ample consideration from the
Commission. Mr. March also stated that the sign proposed by County Bank is similar in size to signs
that are located in other communities such as Center City and Forest Lake.
Commission Member Kilian stated his unwillingness to allow a reader board sign similar to that of a car
dealership located in Forest Lake due to the fact that it distracts peoples driving attention and is
unsightly. Mr. Shannon stated that the sign the bank is proposing is much smaller than the one in Forest
Lake and could be programmed to allow the printing to be stable. Mr. Shannon felt that the sign could
be an asset to the community by announcing community events.
Commission Member Brainard questioned the materials that would be used for the temporary sign and if
footings would be needed to support same. Mr. Shannon indicated footings were not needed for a
temporary sign; however, the bank would like to place the footings for the permanent sign prior to the
ground freezing and have the sign in place prior to the anticipated February 2001 opening.
Page 5 of I3
Commission Member Brainard expressed a desire to amend Ordinance #4 rather than granting a
variance.
Commission Member Kilian questioned why the footings and steel posts could not be placed this fall
prior to the ground freezing and modifYing at a future date subsequent to the amended Ordinance. Mr.
Shannon stated he has not built signs that way but indicated it was possible.
Mr. March stated he concurred with Commission Member Brainard and stated that ifthe sign ordinance
is not amended that the bank should apply for a Special Use Permit rather than a variance.
Commission Member LaMotte expressed his desire to revise the sign ordinance rather than granting a
variance.
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers stated that she would prefer revisiting the sign portion of Ordinance
#4 rather than granting the variance.
Motion bv Commission Member DeVine, seconded bv Commission Member Sheppard to continue
the public hearin!: to the October 11, 2000 Citv Council Meeting at 6:00 p.m. All in favor. Motion
carried unanimously.
Chairperson Hanson closed the public hearing at 7:50 p.m.
III. APPEARANCES
I. Me. Roger Shimon - ZoninglElectrical Fencing
Me. March indicated Me. Shimon was unable to attend the meeting and had requested that the
Commission table the matter to the November 14, 2000 meeting.
Motion by Commission Member Brainard. seconded by Commission Member McLean to table
Mr. Shimon's appearance before the Planning and Zoninl! Commission to the November 14, 2000
Plannin!! and Zoning Commission Meetin!! at 6:30 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
2. Ground Development
Mr. Terry Hannah, Ground Development, appeared before the Commission to present a proposed
development plan for the former Gor-em Property. The property is located south of the Center Oaks
Development.
Mr. March noted some initial concerns based on the plans presented. Those include double frontage
lots, access to the two (2) homes that are already located off of Short Street, rear yards that have useable
property on the other side of wetlands, proposed trail location and dead-end roads not ending in
temporary cul-de-sacs.
Me. Sterm, Ground Development's engineer, addressed the concerns of Me. March by indicating thei
willingness to work within City requirements. Me. Sterm stated that there are several ways to modif
and improve the plan and they are open to suggestions.
Page 6 of 13
Mr. March questioned whether Ground Development had considered other plans prior to presenting the
plans to the City. Mr. Sterm stated that they usually have one (I) plan they feel strongly about and not
several plans.
Commission Member Kilian questioned whether the residents to the north had been consulted as to
whether they wanted a trail running behind their property. Mr. Sterm said that they had not contacted
these residents, however, they would be willing to do so.
Chairperson Hanson questioned whether the developer anticipated a traffic problem on Centerville Road
being the only access to the development. Mr. Sterm indicated a traffic study has not been completed,
but one could be done. Mr. Sterm also indicated he will be working with Anoka County with regards to
Centerville Road being the only access and additional road requirements needed.
Commission Member LaMotte questioned whether the development was contained in the MUSA. Mr.
Hannah indicated two thirds (2/3) of the development is contained in MUSA for 2001 and the final one
third (1/3) is contained in MUSA for 2005. Mr. LaMotte also questioned if the development would be
built in phases based on the MUSA line. Mr. Hannah stated it would be built in phases beginning with
those lots closest to Centerville Road.
Commission Member LaMotte questioned how Ground Development intended to handle the
development where the drainage ditches are concerned. Mr. Hannah indicated they were just made
aware of the ditches and would work with the City Engineer to comply with requirements and
recommendations of the City.
Mr. March stated that it would be the City's preference for temporary cuI-de-sacs rather than pads for
turn-arounds based on the fact the turn-arounds in the past have been used for extra storage of boats and
vehicles rather than turn-arounds.
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers stated, as a property owner to the south of the proposed
development, she would prefer to have the cul-de-sac so that it would look like the road had ended. She
noted if the street appears to go through; off road vehicles, including snowmobiles, will go straight
through onto her property and she would prefer not to have that type of problem.
Commission Member DeVine questioned whether the City would require a park in the development.
Mr. March indicated the Parks and Recreation Commission had not meet on the issue -but he thought
they would prefer a park dedication fee.
Commission Member LaMotte questioned the type of homes Ground Development anticipates building
in the development. Mr. Hannah stated they would use a diverse group of builders so there would be a
diverse type of homes. Mr. Hannah stated that it is their preference to have as many ramblers and
walkout ramblers as possible rather than split entry homes. He believes having ramblers rather than split
entry homes will enhance the value and appearance of the property.
Mr. Hannah provided a copy of the covenants and restrictions required in Ground Development's
development in the City of Independence.
Mr. March questioned how the developer intended to enforce the outside storage covenants and
restrictions. Mr. Hannah stated that the covenants are given to builders who in turn give them to the
property owners. Mr. Hannah stated he works in conjunction with the builder, the City and the property
owner to make sure outside storage complies with the developer's covenants and City ordinance.
Page 7 of 13
Mr. March questioned if Ground Development was open to the City requiring a minimum size fo
garages within the development. Mr. Hannah stated that Ground Development was open to aL
suggestions from the City.
Commission Member DeVine stated an interest in reviewing the elevations for the lots to determine
what type of buildings the lots would accommodate.
Mr. March stated the City is looking for higher valued homes to balance out the housing stock in the
community, as there are currently a high number of entry-level homes. Mr. Hannah agreed and stated it
is the preference of Ground Development to build as many full basement homes as possible to increase
home values.
Commission Member Brainard state he would like to see the development come to CentervilIe.
Mr. March stated he preferred Ground Development's design concept to the design previously submitted
by Gor-Em.
Commission Member DeVine questioned whether Mr. Palzer had any questions or concerns. Mr. Palzer
stated that he had concerns regarding the cul-de-sac to the northwest ofthe development not meeting the
lots to the north. Mr. Palzer also stated that the same lots may be large enough to be divided in the
future and there is a potential that they may be assessed double sewer and water assessments. Mr. Sterm
noted he would check to see if they were large enough to be subdivided.
Mr. March expressed a concern for Lots I through 7 of Block 3 due to the fact that Dupre Road run
behind the lots and there would be no privacy in the back of those lots. Mr. Sterm stated that something
different could be done if it is the desire of the City with those lots such as leaving it a natural wetland.
IV. OLD BUSINESS
I. Hasaik Variance Request
Commission Member DeVine questioned if the Hasaiks would need a variance to do the interior work if
the building were not non-conforming. Mr. March said there would not be a requirement for a variance,
but a building permit would still need to be obtained.
Commission Member DeVine stated he would recommend partially approving the variance to allow for
the interior modifications provided the proper permits and inspections were obtained.
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers questioned Mr. Palzer whether sheet rocking the interior of the pole
barn would fall under the definition of "expanding the use" of the building. Mr. Palzer stated it was his
interpretation that sheet rocking the interior of the building intensified the use of a pole building and that
is the reason a stop order was placed on the improvements.
Commission Member Kilian questioned whether all the interior improvements would need to be
removed for the inspection. Mr. Palzer stated he would visually inspect the improvements prior to th
official building inspection to ascertain which items needed to be removed prior to the offici
inspection.
Page 8 of 13
Chairperson Hanson questioned the status of the interior work. Mrs. Hasiak stated that the sheet rock
and insulation has been installed, but the finishing drywall has not been applied.
Mr. March stated that he feels the interior finish work meets the criteria required for a variance but that
enlarging the building does not.
Chairperson Hanson stated his opposition to granting a variance for expanding the building due to
setting a precedent for others to request variances for larger accessory buildings than allowed by
ordinance.
Dave Radeck, 6960 Meadow Circle, appeared before the Commission and stated that he drives past the
property every day on the way to and from work and the pole building is an eyesore.
Mrs. Hasiak stated the pole barn is in better shape than the house is due to the crawlspace's foundation
collapsing.
Chairperson Hanson made a point of order comment indicating issues relating to the civil dispute
between Mrs. Hasiak and the former property owner should be kept out of the discussion regarding the
variance request.
Mrs. Hasiak stated the house would not have been sold without the pole barn being there is no garage.
Mr. Palzer indicated the Hasiaks have the right to add an attached garage to the house.
Council Liasion Broussard Vickers questioned how long the building would be allowed to remain on the
property as a non-conforming structure. Mr. Palzer indicated under the old Ordinance #4 it was thirty
(30) years and under the new ordinance there is no timeframe.
Motion by Commission Member DeVine, seconded by Commission Member Sheppard to
recommend to Council approval of the variance to allow for the interior chanl!es provided the
proper buildinl! permits and inspections are obtained and to deny the variance request for
expansion of the non-conforminl! structure. Ayes - 5 Nays -1 (Brainard) Abstain - 1 (McLean).
Motion carried.
2. County Bank Variance Request
Chairperson Hanson stated he would prefer not to grant the variance and that the sign ordinance needs to
be reviewed and amended.
Council Liasion Broussard Vickers stated she would prefer to revisit the sign ordinance in depth rather
than grant the variance. She also indicated she believed it was the general consensus of the Council that
County Bank's sign would fit within the parameters discussed, however, no final agreement on changes
to the sign ordinance were made. Therefore, there is no guarantee the sign proposed by County Bank
would conform to ordinance requirements.
Commission Member DeVine stated he would like to amend the sign ordinance to designate a special
district east of 20th A venue on either side of Main Street to allow for signs such as the one proposed by
County Bank.
Page 9 of 13
Commission Member Kilian stated it was his preference that County Bank put in the footings and leave
the pipes long enough for a larger sign should the sign be approved and if the sign is not approved thi
pipes may be cut to the proper length for a sign to conform to City ordinance.
Motion bv Commission Member Brainard. seconded bv Commission Member Kilian to
recommend to Council denial of County Bank's reQuest for a silm variance. Aves - 4 Navs - 3
(DeVine. Sheppard. McLean). Motion carried.
3. Salazar Variance Request
Commission Member Kilian questioned whether Mr. Palzer had told Mr. Salazar the property line began
twelve (12) to fourteen (14) feet from the curb. Mr. Palzer indicated he had told him his property line
began twelve (12) to fourteen (14) feet from the curb as that is an approximate for a normal setback. He
also indicated it is the responsibility of the homeowner to locate the property line and that the
information received from the City should only be a guideline to assist him in determining the location
of the property line.
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers noted it is the responsibility of the property owner not the City to
determine where the property line is before commencing work. She stated she does not support leaving
the fence in the right-of-way as the City did take steps via a certified letter to inform the Salazars a
variance may be required.
Commission Member Kilian stated his approval for the variance to allow a six (6) foot fence provided it
did not go beyond the back comer ofthe garage and is not in the City's right-of-way.
Commission Member McLean questioned Mr. Palzer's preference on the matter. Mr. Palzer stated it is
his preference to keep the fence out of the right-of-way to avoid problems in the future.
Commission Member DeVine questioned whether Mr. Salazar would be required to move the sprinkler
system if the City requests he move the fence out of the right-of-way.
It was the consensus of the Commission that any costs associated with the relocation of fence outside of
the right-of-way was the Salazar's responsibility.
Mr. March state that Mr. Salazar had indicated if the City does not grant the variance he will not put the
fence up "because the City won't let him."
Mr. Palzer stated that previously other residents have requested variances for the exact same thing and
were denied, as the old ordinance was in effect then which defined comer lots to have two front yards.
Mr. March questioned whether the intent of the Planning and Zoning Commission was to modify the
ordinance to indicate comer lots did not have two (2) front yards. If so, the six (6) foot fence would be
allowed because it would be in the side yard.
Council Liasion Broussard Vickers indicated she believed it was the intent of Council to modify the
ordinance as it relates to comer lots and indicate that a comer lot would only have one (I) front yard.
Motion bv Commission Member Kilian. seconded by Commission Member McLean to
recommend to Council to l!.rant the variance for the 6-foot fence provided the fence is on or inside
Page 10 of 13
the property line. Ayes - 3 Nays - 3 (DeVine. Sheppard. LaMotte) Abstain - 1 (Brainard).
Motion failed.
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers stated she was unsure the variance request met the requirements, as
she does not believe the situation is unique and believes the situation was created by their own actions.
Ms. Vickers also stated that a minor revision to the ordinance to change the language to define comer
lots as not having two front yards would solve the problem.
Chairperson Hanson called a five-minute recess at 9:30 p.m.
Chairperson Hanson called the meeting back to order at 9:35 p.m.
4. Ordinance #4 - Building Official's Recommendation for Modification
Mr. Palzer raised an issue in regards to the newly adopted Ordinance #4. A resident recently questioned
how small of a garage could be built in Royal Meadows. Upon reviewing the new ordinance, Mr. Palzer
discovered garages that are attached to the dwelling unit have no minimum size and those detached from
the dwelling unit are limited by the "2% of yard" rule.
By definition, an accessory structure is allowed only to be detached as noted on page 2. On page 19, an
accessory building cannot be attached, so the entire first sentence of the second paragraph should be
deleted. Also the second sentence requires deletion of "unless attached to and made a part of the main
building: and the five (5) foot requirement should be changed to six (6) feet to be consistent with the
building code. Detached accessory structures used, as a garage should be allowed to be larger than 2%
of the yard area in the M-l and R-4 zones due to the very narrow and small lot sizes in these districts.
Most of the homes in these districts occupy most of the width of the lot.
The "District Regulations" should be modified with the addition of a minimum garage size. The
existing regulations require four hundred forty (440) square feet in the R-2 and R-2A zones and six
hundred (600) square feet in the R-5 zone. Mr. Palzer recommended a minimum of two hundred twenty
(220) square feet in the R-4 and M-l zones. The Commission may choose to add a maximum size for an
attached garage. Currently, the building code allows up to three thousand (3,000) square feet as a
maximum, which is extremely large in most of the residential districts in Centerville.
Mr. March stated he would like the City to require a minimum of six hundred (600) square feet of
garage space for all new construction in R2, R-2A and R-5.
Mrs. Richard Haug, 1965 South Robin Lane, stated she was the homeowner Mr. Palzer was referring to
and that she currently has no garage. Mrs. Haug stated she would like to build a garage, as it is her
desire to store some of her lawn and garden equipment, as well as to have a place to park some of her
vehicles.
Mr. Palzer indicated it may be possible for the property owner to attach the garage to the house with a
breezeway and then there would be no maximum square footage limitation.
Mr. March inquired as to the size of garage the property owner would like to construct. Mr. Palzer
stated it was approximately twenty-four (24) by twenty (26) feet or the equivalent of a two and a half car
garage.
Page II of 13
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers noted the ordinance needs to be revised defining minimums and
maximums for attached and detached garages.
Mr. Palzer stated it would be his preference to have the garage attached to the house rather than
detached because in his opinion the garage would be better maintained if it were part of the house.
Mrs. Haug inquired as to the height limitation for the structure. Mr. Palzer stated the maximum height is
fourteen (14) feet.
Council Liasion Broussard Vickers suggested Staff draft some suggested wording changes to Ordinance
#4 and present them for a public hearing at the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.
Motion by Commission Member DeVine. seconded by Commission Member Brainard to table
discussion on Ordinance #4 to the November 14. 2000 Plan nine: and Zonine: Commission Meetin!:
at 6:30 p.m. to allow Staff to draft a revision to the ordinance. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
5. Sample Sign Ordinances
Chairperson Hanson recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission schedule workshop dates
to discuss proposed modifications to the sign section of Ordinance #4.
A consensus was that the Planning and Zoning Commission schedule workshops to discuss the proposed
modifications to the sign section of Ordinance #4 on October 17, October 24, November 21, an,
November 28,2000 at 6:30 p.m. at the Public Works Building.
Motion by Commission Member DeVine to recommend to Council to amend the sign section of
Ordinance #4 to establish a special district from 20th Avenue east to the Citv limits on both sides of
the street to allow for sie:ns two hundred (200) SQuare feet and forty (40) feet high. The motion
died for lack of a second.
Motion bv Commission Member Brainard. seconded by Commission Member DeVine to schedule
workshop dates to discuss proposed modifications to the sie:n section of Ordinance #4 on October
17. October 24. November 21. and November 28. 2000 at 6:30 p.m. at the Public Works Building.
All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
V. NEW BUSINESS
I. 200 I Budget
Mr. March discussed with the Commission the 2000 budget with funds being $1,540 and questioned
whether or not the consensus of the Planning and Zoning Commission was to retain the same level for
2001.
It was the consensus of the Planning and Zoning Commission for the budget to remain at $1,540 for
2001.
2. Reschedule November Meeting Due to Elections
Page 12 of 13
It was the consensus of the Planning and Zoning Commission to reschedule the November meeting to
November 14,2000 due to the elections.
VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS
There were no discussion items.
VII. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
I. July 19, 2000 Joint Workshop Meeting Minutes
Motion bv Commission Member DeVine. seconded bv Chairperson Hanson to approve the July
19. 2000 Joint Workshop Meetin!! Minutes. All in favor. Abstain - 4 (Hanson. Kilian. Sheppard,
McLean). Motion carried.
2. August 1,2000 Meeting Minutes
Motion bv Commission Member Kilian. seconded bv Commission Member DeVine to approve the
Au!!ust 1. 2000 Meetin!! Minutes. All in favor. Abstain - 1 (Sheppard). Motion carried.
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers noted she was in attendance at the August I, 2000 meeting and
requested that it be included in the minutes.
3. September 5, 2000 Meeting Minutes
Commission Member McLean requested the minutes be changed to reflect his attendance at the
September 5, 2000 meeting.
Motion bv Commission Member McLean. seconded bv Commission Member Devine to approve
the September 5, 2000 meetin!! minutes with the reauested chan!!e. All in favor. Abstain - 4
(LaMotte. Kilian. Hanson, Brainard).
VII. ADJOURNMENT
Motion bv Commission Member DeVine, seconded bv Commission Member Sheppard to adiourn
the October 3.2000 Plannin!! and Zonin!!: Commission Meet!n!! at 10:00 p.m. All in favor. Motion
carried unanimously.
Transcribed by:
Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
Page 13 of 13
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 11, 2000 "
6:00 p.m. i
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly sche u ed meeting on
October II, 2000, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. . ~
>:~;- ;,;
9; ..~~~
;.:.::;\':r.',i. ., ?~
iDl i
,,'A F I
......"''J;:' ,.
:-;;:':1;'_' 1'"
,~, .,:,,".,;;;., .
.~' '9~ \i
,t :~~M: *
.
PRESENT:
Mayor Tom Wilharber
Council Member Dick Travis
Council Member Terry Sweeney
Council Member Mari Nelson
(arrived 6:01 p.m.)
ABSENT:
Council Member Linda Broussard Vickers
STAFF:
City Administrator, Jim March
City Attorney, James Hoeft
City Engineer, Tom P rson
I. CALL TO ORDE
Mayor Wilharber c
e ng to order at 6:00 p.m.
II.
III.
rove the
, and D ve annon, Color Sign, appeared before Council to review
sign to be placed at the northwest corner of the intersection
n 2 st Avenue. . Bode explained that County Bank is requesting a larger,
d i cl a time and temperature reader board. The size exceeds Ordinance #4' s sign
sad the time and temperature reader board is not addressed. Mr. Bode explained that
s t d revised, schematic for the sign shows a two (2) foot taller sign than previously
d and includes an instant cash sign below the main sign. Mr. Bode also explained that the
os sign would be approximately 26.58 feet tall and two hundred eleven (211) square feet in
Size.
The Planning and Zoning Commission denied recommending this variance and consensus was that
the sign section of Ordinance #4 be amended to create a special sign district for commercial
property located east of 20th Avenue and on both sides of Main Street. This would allow
businesses to have similar signs to the City of Lino Lakes' .
Mayor Wilharber opened the public hearing at 6:02 p.m.
Page I of 14
.
Mayor Wilharber questioned the desired installation date of the sign. Mr. Bode stated that County
Bank would like to install the footings prior to the ground freezing and prior to their anticipated
opening date of February, 2001.
Mayor Wilharber questioned whether Mr. March felt the Planning and Zoning Commission
intended to modify the ordinance to allow larger signs and Mr. March stated that the Planning and
Zoning Commission had not determined the proper modifications; however, consensus was that
the current sign section of Ordinance #4 was too restrictive.
Council Member Sweeney questioned the proposed sign dimensions comparative to others in Lino
Lakes. Mr. Shannon, Color Sign, stated that the Amoco sign is taner and the square footage of the
sign is larger than what the Bank is proposing.
Mr. Bode stated that the sign is similar to signs the bank currently has installed at their branch
offices in Forest Lake and Center City. Mr. Bode stated that the Planning and Zoning
Commission expressed concern in regards to the proposed reader board and the possibility of
visual distractions. Mr. Bode stated that the bank intents to use a color of light that is pleasing to
the eye and not distracting. Mr. Bode also stated that if the City desires, "traveling messages"
would not be used.
Mayor Wilharber stated that County Bank's request comes at a time when the City recognizes that
the sign section of Ordinance #4 is inadequate and is in the process of being amended. Mr.
Wilharber stated that it was his opinion that the City needs to accommodate businesses that come
to town and provide a positive approach to their signage. Mayor Wilharber felt that by approving
the variance it would show good faith on behalf of the City.
Mr. Bode ensured the Council that the sign would be in proportion to the building and would not
look out of place.
Motion by Council Member Sweenev. seconded bv Council Member Travis to close the
DubHc hearinl!:. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Mayor Wilharber closed the public hearing at 6:10 P.M.
2. Hasiak Variance Reauest
Mr. and Mrs. Stan Hasiak, 6994 Centerville Road, appeared before Council to review their
submitted variance request to enlarge the exterior and enhance the interior of an existing pole barn
structure that exists on their property. The existing structure exceeds Ordinance #4's Accessory
Structure requirements and is a non-conforming structure. Mr. Hasiak began constructing a "Iean-
to" addition to the north side of the structure and interior improvements. Paul Palzer, Building
Official, issued a stop work order on the project and has requested that interior improvements be
removed to anow proper inspection. Both construction improvements, interior and exterior, were
started without building permits.
The Planning and Zoning Commission motioned to recommend granting a variance for the interior
improvements, but indicated that the work would have to be inspected and the appropriate
building permits issued. The Planning and Zoning Commission denied the exterior improvements.
Mayor Wilharber opened the public hearing at 6: I 0 p.m.
Page 2 of 14
Mrs. Hasiak stated their willingness to remove the "lean-to" exterior improvement and that their
primary request was to be allowed to make interior improvements similar to other garages located
within the City. Mrs. Hasiak explained that the house located on the property has a crawl space
unsuitable for storage due to water, sewer and foundation damage. Mrs. Hasiak also explained
that they intended on using the existing structure as a garage. Mrs. Hasiak stated that they
currently do not have a garage.
Council Member Nelson questioned whether the issue involved removing the non-conforming
structure. Mayor Wilharber explained the variance request was concerning the interior
improvements and the exterior "lean-to" addition to the non-conforming structure.
Mayor Wilharber stated that the non-conforming structure had been located on the parcel for many
years. Mr. March indicated the non-conforming structure has been grand fathered in and may stay
on the property; however, a variance is needed to improve the structure.
Council Member Nelson questioned if the variance was denied, would the interior improvements
and exterior construction need to be removed. Mr. March confirmed that it would.
Council Member Nelson questioned Mrs. Hasiak as to the status of the improvements. Mrs.
Hasiak indicated that the interior has had a cement floor poured, wiring run, insulated, and sheet
rocked. Mrs. Hasiak also stated these items needed to be done to convert the pole barn to a
garage.
Motion bv Council Member Sweenev. seconded bv Council Member Travis to close the
public hearinl!. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Mayor Wilharber closed the public hearing at 6: 17 p.m.
3. Salazar Variance Request
Mr. and Mrs. Pedro Salazar, 7336 Old Mill Road, appeared before Council to review their
submitted variance request allowing them to construct a six (6) foot, wooden, privacy fence in
their rear yard. Mr. And Mrs. Salazar explained that their property is on a comer lot and
according to Ordinance #4 they have two (2) front yards. Mr. Salazar has begun construction of
the privacy fence one (I) foot into the road right-of-way. The Salazars presented Council with
two (2) letters from neighboring residents indicting their approval of the placement of the fence.
The Planning and Zoning Commission is in the process of amending and defining the language
relating to comer lots and denied the variance.
Mr. Salazar stated that it would be cost prohibitive for him to relocate the fence and existing
sprinkler line. Mr. Salazar also stated that it was his intention to provide a safer environment for
his neighbors and his dogs. Mr. Salazar expressed the need to complete the fencing prior to
making the improvements to the kennel as required previously by Council.
Mayor Wilharber questioned whether allowing the fence to remain in the City' road right-of-way
would interfere with public utilities. Mr. Palzer, Building Official/Public Works Director,
indicated that utilities were run underneath the sidewalk within the Salazar's development so it
would not interfere with same.
Page3 of 14
Council Member Sweeney questioned whether the old or new Ordinance #4 was in effect at the
time Mr. Salazar began construction of the fence. Mr. March stated that Mr. Salazar had begun
construction of the fence prior to the new ordinance.
Mayor Wilharber questioned whether there was any opposition to the fence from others in the
neighborhood. Mr. March stated that he was unaware of opposition to the fence and noted the two
(2) letters presented by the Salazars.
Council Member Nelson indicated she had received a complaint from the neighbor directly across
the street from the Salazars expressing concern that the fence is too close to the sidewalk.
Mr. Salazar indicated he is obligated to keeping the sidewalk clear and will continue to do so.
Mayor Wilharber questioned Mr. Salazar as to snow removal, fence obstruction of same and
indicated that disposing of snow into the street was not allowed. Mr. Salazar indicated his
snowblower would blow the snow up and over the fence into his backyard. Mr. Salazar stated his
willingness to sign any document the City would require of him to acknowledge his financial
responsibility for any repairs to the fence should it be damaged or need to be removed if the City
allowed it to remain in its current location.
Council Member Nelson questioned the purpose of completing the fence prior to fulfilling the
Council's previous requirement in regards to the kennel.
Mayor Wilharber made a point of order comment indicating questions regarding the kennel were
not relative to the Variance Public Hearing.
Council Member Nelson indicated her question was meant to clarify the comments Mr. Salazar
had previously made.
Mr. Salazar stated that in order to cement the floor of the kennel, it needs to be partially
disassembled and the cement would then need to dry prior to reassembly. Mr. Salazar estimated
the process to take approximately one week and during this time, the dogs would not have an
enclosure.
Motion bv Council Member Sweenev. seconded bv Mayor Wilharber to close the public
hearine-. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Wilharber closed the public hearing at 6:27 p.m.
4. Northern Forest Products - Five Year Tax Abatement
Mr. March indicated the official public hearing on the tax abatement was scheduled for November
8, 2000. He told Council he had been working with Ehlers and Associates and Mr. McDowell,
Northern Forest Products, to establish the proposed increase in taxable market valuation for the
proposed expansion. Accurate figures should be available for the October 25, 2000 Council
meeting.
No comments were heard from the audience.
Page 4 of 14
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Sweeney to close the
public hearin!!. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Wilharber closed the public hearing at 6:29 p.m.
IV. APPEARANCES/AWARDS
None.
V. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
Council Member Sweeney requested the following changes: On Page 7 of 12 the motion
concerning the final payment on the 20th A venue water/sewer utility improvements add the
sentence after the word "improvements". "The check should be made payable to whomever City
Attorney Hoeft deems appropriate." On Page 11 of 12 in the paragraph concerning cable change
from "anyone not receiving cable" to "anyone not receiving the government access channel
through their cable company".
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Travis to approve the
September 27. 2000. City Council Medin!! Minutes with the noted chan!!es. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimouslv.
VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
The City of CentervilIe September 28. throu!!h October 4. 2000
Motion bv Council Member Travis. seconded bv Council Member Nelson to approve tbe
expenditures for the City from September 28. 2000 throu!!h October 4. 2000. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimouslv.
Centennial Fire District Expenses
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Travis to approve the
Centennial Fire District expenditures in the amount of $3.436.70. All in favor. Motion
carried unanimouslv.
Pay Estimate Number 2 - Hunter's Crossing
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Nelson to approve Pay
Estimate Number 2 on the Hunter's Crossin!! Development in the amount of $199.943.79.
All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
VII. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS
Council Member Nelson stated she had received several complaints regarding a water testing fee
on residents 3'd quarter utility bills. Mr. March stated that the City is allowed, by State law, to
recoup this fee once per year. Mr. Palzer stated that the City is required to take daily samples and
test them internally. Additional monthly, quarterly and annually samples are tested at an off-site
lab to ensure safe drinking water requirements are met.
Page 5 of 14
Mayor Wi]harber questioned whether residents had been informed of this charge. Mr. Pa]zer
stated he did not believe information had been provided to residents concerning this issue other
than the fee placement on individual utility bills.
Mayor Wi]harber requested that staff place an article in the next LeJournal in regards to this item.
Mr. March stated that Mr. Wayne LeBlanc, Parks and Recreation Committee member, had
brought to his attention the fact that the trail in Hunter's Crossing would be connecting to the
Anoka County Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park and perhaps the City's trail should be
widened to ten (10) feet to coincide with same. Mr. March stated he visually inspected same and
believes the trail could be paved out to nine and one half (9 Y:.) feet without any significant costs
incurred other than the cost of the extra bituminous. Mr. March clarified that Mr. LeBlanc was not
speaking on behalf of the Parks and Recreation Committee.
Mayor Wi]harber questioned whether the City or the developer would incur the additional
expenditures relating to widening the trail. Mr. Peterson, City Engineer, indicated the additional
burden would be the developer's responsibility. Mr. Peterson estimated the additional cost to be
$1,400.
Mayor Wi]harber questioned the Parks and Recreation Committee's decision on this matter.
Council Member Sweeney stated it was his understanding that the Committee wanted to set a
minimum width standard for parks in the new developments; however, the Committee was
unaware that the Hunter's Crossing trail would connect to the Anoka County Rice Creek Chain of
Lakes Regional Park. Council Member Sweeney stated that the Committee was more concerned
with the quality of the trail rather than the width of same.
Mayor Wi]harber stated that there has been a considerable amount of time planning within the
City and other cities for consistent trail ways.
Council Member Sweeney stated if it was the intention of the City to create a trail that crosses the
City from east to west then he believed a wider trail would be more accessible and easier to use.
Mayor Wilharber questioned the additional cost for maintaining a larger than planned trail. Mr.
Palzer stated that there would be additional costs involved in maintaining the trail; however, they
would not exceed the benefit and felt that the costs would be minimal.
Mayor Wi]harber mentioned the trail in Hunter's Crossing was being created over roots of trees
and questioned if the roots should have been removed in order to prevent them from growing back
through the trail. Mr. Peterson stated that typically roots grow downward and with the grave] and
bituminous over the top, there should be not problems.
Council Member Nelson stated her desire to have consistent trail ways within the community.
Consensus was to add Widening the Hunter's Crossing Deve]opment Trail as number 10 under
New Business on the agenda.
Mr. March stated that he had received a letter from residents residing at ] 760 Center Street,
indicating that the drain tile underneath their driveway had settled and the driveway needed to be
Page 6 of]4
!
repaired. Mr. Palzer stated that the driveways in that area have been a reoccurring problem due to
frost and heaving. Mr. Palzer stated that the City has previously paid to repair same.
Mayor Wilharber requested that Mr. March research this issue and provide information to Council
and residents experiencing this problem.
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Travis to add discussion
of the driveways on Center Street to the al!enda for the next City Council Meetinl!. All in
favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Wilharber stated that he had received some complaints concerning animals running at large
and pet owners not removing fecal matter from their animals. Mayor Wilharber urged animal
owners to be responsible and clean up after their animal( s) and not allow their animals to run at
large.
Mayor Wilharber stated he attended the ten (10) year anniversary gathering for the Anoka County
Traveler. Mayor Wilharber also stated that he questioned how service to Centerville residents
could be improved and the Traveler indicated they have serviced several residents in Centerville
and suggested placing their number in a newsletter to heighten awareness.
Mayor Wilharber stated he received a complaint concerning the price of admission to Anoka
County and Washington County parks. Anoka County informed him that they do not offer a
discount rate for seniors; however, they do offer an annual pass which would allow unlimited
access to parks and provide discount admission to Hennepin County parks. Mayor Wilharber
requested that price information be placed in the next LeJournal.
Mayor Wilharber stated he had a meeting with John Olson, Anoka County Highway Department,
and discussed connecting the trail way on the east side of Centerville Lake to the Anoka County
Rice Creek Regional Park trail way system. Mr. Olson stated that a feasibility study would need
to be completed by the City. Mayor Wilharber also questioned the upgrading of Main Street and
anticipated widening of same. Mr. Olson stated that it would be approximately 15 years before
those improvements would be made.
Mayor Wilharber suggested that additional senior housing was needed and felt that this area
needed additional attention. Mr. March said there is a possibility of receiving property back from
the County and working with a private developer to bring senior housing to the City.
Mayor Wilharber stated he had spoken with the Anoka County Attorney, Robert Johnson,
concerning a rash of juvenile crimes within the City. In June, the elementary school was
vandalized in the amount of $25,000, a home under construction in the Deer Pass Development
was vandalized, juveniles are loitering and blocking traffic on Main Street and there were thirty-
one (31) tire slashings in August. Mayor Wilharber stated to Mr. Johnson that people who reside
in Centerville feel this behavior is unacceptable and are willing to work with the County Attorney
to deter criminal activity in the future.
Mayor Wilharber stated that the area surrounding the old Public Works site is an eyesore and
needs to be cleaned up. Mr. March stated that Mr. Palzer is working on the area and several things
were removed today.
Page 7 of 14
Mayor Wilharber stated that he had spoken with the Chief of Police regarding grant funds
available for lighting city parks that had been mentioned by the Public Works Department and the
Chief was unaware of funds being available for this purpose. The Chief also stated that two (2) to
three (3) police vehicles would be parked at the new Public Works site.
VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement - Trio Inn (tabled from the September 27. 2000 meeting) -
Legal Counsel Report
A letter from the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division was discussed at the last meeting.
The letter referenced an alleged liquor violation stemming from the Trio Inn. At that meeting, the
item was tabled to allow the City Attorney to review the statutes in regards to enforcement
provisions by the State.
Consensus was not to fine the establishment for the a1\eged violation. However, since the
meeting, Mr. March has discussed this matter with Mr. Paul Montain, (Owner, Trio Inn) and
stated that even if the City did not elect to issue a civil penalty, the State could levy a penalty
against the Trio Inn. Mr. Montain indicated his willingness to donate $200 to $300 to the City of
Centerville or the Centennial Lakes Police Department in further support of the work that they are
doing to curtail underage liquor consumption.
City Attorney Hoeft stated that upon reviewing the statute governing this issue, it clearly states
that the State can impose a penalty, in addition to the City if they choose, provided the total
amount of the penalty does not exceed $2,000.
Mayor Wilharber questioned whether the City Attorney was aware of the State enforcing a penalty
as a matter of course, if the City has penalized the business. City Attorney Hoeft indicated most
cities have a guideline established for when an a1\eged liquor violation takes place. Thereby,
making it easy for the city to refer to the guidelines and apply the proper fine to the offense. Mr.
March stated that Mr. Montain made it clear that he does not condone this behavior at his
establishment and would provide proper education to his employees to ensure that a similar
violation would not happen in the future.
Council Member Sweeney suggested that Council discuss this matter at a work session and
prepare guidelines that would assist in this area for future reference. Mr. Hoeft stated that fining a
business $200 or $300 would be in keeping with guidelines of other cities for first time offenses.
Council Member Nelson stated that it was her understanding that Council voted previously not to
fine the business owner and feels even though she persona1\y voted to fine the business, the
original vote of Council should stand.
Attorney Hoeft stated that there were no guarantees that the State would not fine a business in
addition to any fines the City may impose.
Mayor Wilharber indicated he would be in favor of fining the Trio Inn an amount not to exceed
$300 and the drafting of a letter, by the City, stating that they have imposed a fine. It is hopeful
that this letter would attempt to curtail the State from imposing additional fines.
Page 8 of 14
I-
I
Motion by Mayor Wilharber. seconded by Council Member Travis to fine the Trio Inn in
the amount of $300 and to forward the $300 to the Centennial Lakes Police Department to
assist efforts in curtailinl! underal!e liquor consumption. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
1. County Bank Variance Request
Council Member Trayis questioned whether Mr. Shannon, Color Sign, had researched
neighboring cities' ordinances to determine if their signs were in keeping with those ordinances.
Mr. Shannon indicated he had done so and submitted a report to Mr. March.
Motion by Council Member Travis. seconded bv Council Member Nelson to approve the
Countv Bank sil!n variance. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
2. Hasiak Variance Request
Council Member Sweeney questioned whether the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning
Commission was to allow the interior improvements to the building but to deny the exterior
expansion. Mr. March indicated that was correct.
Motion bv Council Member Sweenev. seconded by Council Member Nelson to approve the
Hasiak variance request allowin~ interior improvements to the non-conforminl! structure
and denyinl! exterior expansion improvements. The Hasiaks are required to obtain the
required inspections and buildinl! permits. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Salazar Variance Request
Motion by Council Member Sweenev. seconded bv Mayor Wilharber to approve the Salazar
variance request to allow for the six (6) foot. wood. privacv fence and for the fence to remain
in the City ril!ht-of-wav provided Mr. Salazar sien a document acceptine full financial
responsibility for anv damaees or removal ofthe fence from the City ril!ht-of-way.
City Attorney Hoeft noted a stipulation should be added to the motion to provide that Mr. Salazar
sign a document accepting full financial responsibility for any costs incurred for damage to or
removal of the fence. Mr. Sweeney requested a sentence concerning that matter be added to his
motion.
Council Member Travis indicated he had driven by the residence and feels the cost to move the
fence would be minimal due to the fact there were only two (2) comer posts installed. He
indicated the sprinkler issue is merely moving a few sprinkler heads, which is relatively easy.
Mayor Wilharber indicated he did not feel the resident should incur additional costs to move the
fence when he was originally given misinformation by a representative of the City. Mayor
Wilharber stated that he believed the fence is not far enough into the City's road right-of-way to
cause any real issue and he is in favor of the variance.
Council Member Nelson stated that she sympathizes with the Salazars as they are trying to do the
right thing, but does not feel that the variance requirements have been met.
Page 9 of 14
Mayor Wilharber called for a vote on the motion.
Aves - 2 (Wilharber and Sweeney) Navs - 2 (Travis and Nelson). The motion failed for lack
of a maioritv.
Council Member Travis indicated he is not opposed to the fence, but is concerned that the fence is
built in the City's road right-of-way.
Mayor Wilharber questioned the options the Salazars had due to Councils lack of majority. Mr.
Hoeft indicated the Council could grant the variance request for the six (6) foot, wood, privacy
fence provided it is not in the City's road right-of-way, allowing the Salazars to continue the
~~ .
Motion bv Council Member Travis. seconded bv Council Member Nelson to e:rant the
variance reauest for the six (6) foot. wood. nrivacv fence nrovided it is not in the City's road
rie:ht-of-wav.
Council Member Sweeney expressed his concern that the City may be imposing a hardship on the
residents by not granting the variance. Mr. Salazar has been required by the City to meet certain
specification in regards to keeping his dogs and has agreed to add fencing to make the neighbors
more comfortable and to keep children separated from his dogs. Council Member Sweeney stated
that requiring Mr. Salazar to move the fence would require additional monies to be expended by
Mr. Salazar, which he has indicated he does not have. Therefore, Council Member Sweeney
would like to see the variance approved.
Mayor Wilharber stated that there would be a Council Member absent at the next meeting also.
He then stated that he understood the opposition to the variance request concerning the City's road
right-of-way but noted Mr. Salazar had agreed to be financially responsible for any costs incurred
due to the fences location in the City's road right-of-way.
Mr. Salazar stated he should have been able to rely upon the information provided to him by the
City and if the information was not reliable, he should have been told to consult another agency to
determine the location of his property lines.
Mr. Salazar indicated twenty (20) postholes have been dug and he has gone through two (2) augers
due to soil conditions. Mr. Salazar stated that he feels the City has pushed him around and all he
is trying to do is provide a safer area for his dogs to exercise and play and to make his neighbors
feel more comfortable.
Mayor Wilharber questioned whom Mr. Salazar spoke with at City Hall. Mr. Palzer indicated he
had given Mr. Salazar the information. Mayor Wilharber questioned how far into the City's road
right-of-way the fence was encroaching. Mr. Palzer stated eight inches.
Mr. Hoeft stated that City officials can not be held accountable for information they give on the
location of property lines, it is ultimate responsibility of the property owner to determine exactly
where the property lines are.
Mayor Wilharber stated that the average property owner is not an attorney, engineer or surveyor
and that if information was obtained from the City he understands why Mr. Salazar would believe
Page 10 of 14
he could rely upon the information. Mayor Wilharber stated he felt the Salazars were attempting
to improve the situation with their dogs. Mayor Wilharber also stated he would like to approve
the variance to ensure that the fence is installed because he believes it would be for the greater
good of the community.
Mr. Salazar reiterated his willingness to sign a document accepting full, financial responsibility for
any damages or removal of the fence due to it location in the City's road right-of-way.
Mr. Salazar stated if the Stop Work Order had not been placed on the project he would have
completed the installation of the fence by this time.
Mayor Wilharber called for a vote on the motion.
Ayes 2 (Travis. Nelson) Navs - 2 (Wilharber. Sweeney). Motion failed for lack of a maioritv.
Motion by Mayor Wilharber. seconded bv Council Member Sweeney to reconsider the
previous motion to !!rant the variance to allow the fence to remain in the ri!!ht-of-wav. Ayes
- 3 (Wilharber. Sweenev. Trayis) Nays -1 (Nelson), Motion carried.
Council Member Travis stated he concurred with Mayor Wilharber and that was reasoning behind
modifying his vote, and believes strongly that the homeowner is responsible for location of their
own property lines prior to beginning projects.
4. Resolution 00-23. a Resolution approving an Abatement of Special Assessments (6973
Meadow Circle)
Mayor Wilharber read information submitted by Teresa Bender bringing to the attention of the
City special assessments for the Parkview Development that were not removed from PIN #R23-
31-22-31-0064 (6973 Meadow Circle) on Anoka County Property and Taxation records following
Burnett Title's payment in July of 1999 and continues to appear on the property owner's statement
of property tax payable in 2000. Resolution 00-23 would provide for an abatement of the special
assessments and the appropriate paperwork needed to rectify the error with Anoka County.
Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Travis to approve
Resolution 00-23. a Resolution approving an Abatement of Special Assessments at 6973
Meadow Circle. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
5. Resolution 00-24. a Resolution Authorizing City Participation in the "Minnesota Cities:
Building Ouality Communities" Effort in Cooperation with the Fellow Members of the
League of Minnesota Cities.
Motion by Council Member Sweenev. seconded by Council Member Travis to approve
Resolution 00-24. a Resolution Authorizin!! Citv Participation in the "Minnesota Cities:
Buildin!! Quality Communities" Effort in Cooperation with the Fellow Members of the
Lea!!ue of Minnesota Cities. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
6. Trail Paving at Acorn Creek Park
Mr. March presented several quotes received for paving the trails in Acorn Creek Park. Two (2)
firms submitted quotes, Arcade Asphalt and Northdale Construction. The quote from Arcade
Page 11 of 14
Asphalt was $10,000 lower than that presented by Northdale Construction. Mr. March
recommended accepting the presented bid from Arcade Asphalt.
Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Nelson to accept the
presented bid from Arcade Asphalt for the pavin~ of the trails in Acorn Creek Park. All in
favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
7. Centerville Redi-Mix - Interim Use Permit (Renewal Reauest)
Mr. March stated that Mr. Shudy, (Owner, Centerville Redi-Mix) has requested renewal of his
Interim Use Permit. Mr. March stated that the Interim Use Permits needs to be reviewed on an
annual basis for an extension not to exceed five years. Mr. March indicated that Mr. Shudy's
current Interim Use Permit is scheduled to expire on October 14, 2000.
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Sweeney to approve the
extension of the Interim Use Permit for Centerville Redi-Mix. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
8. Ground Development
Mr. March presented information to Council regarding Ground Development's proposed plan
located south of the Center Oaks subdivisions.
Mr. Cooper, representing Ground Development, presented a revised sketch of the proposed plan
for the property reflecting the changes requested by the Planning and Zoning Committee.
Discussion ensued regarding the development and Council's request that several items be revisited
prior to resubmission. The following modifications were requested: location of trails; concern
for the drainage ditch through the southern portion of the property; the need for the Parks and
Recreation Committee to determine if a park is desired in the development or if other concession
may be made, saving trees, modifications to the Comprehensive Plan for MUSA, sidewalk
installation on Dupre Road, Anoka County's plans to widen Centerville Road, driveway concerns
for the two (2) residences to the north, and a draft monument entrance sign plan for the
development.
Council Member Nelson left the meeting at 8:30 p.m.
9. Resolution 00-25. a Resolution Aooroving a Public Hearing on the Tax Abatement for
Northern Forest Products
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Travis to approve
Resolution 00-25. a Resolution Approving a Public Hearing on the Tax Abatement for
Northern Forest Products. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
10. The Widening of the Hunter's Crossing Development Trail
Council Member Sweeney stated that due to minimal costs involved with widening the trail way,
he was in favor of asking the developer to pay for same. Council Member Sweeney also stated
that if the developer is not willing to pay the amount required, he would approve of the City
paying for the widening.
Page 12 of 14
Council Member Travis stated he would like the developer to pay for the widening of the trail and
felt that connecting the trail with the Anoka County Park was a good idea.
Mayor Wilharber directed Mr. March to contact the developer to discuss this issue.
Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Travis to approve
widenin!!: of the trail in Hunter's Crossin!!: Development to a 9 Y, foot bituminous trail. All in
favor. Motion carried unanimously.
X. CONSENT AGENDA
XI. COMMITTEE REPORTS
Mayor Wilharber stated that there would be a Police Commission and Fire Steering meeting on
October 12, 2000.
XII. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
Mr. March stated that the old, red, concession stand needed to be removed from the old Public
Works site and placed at the new Public Works site. Mr. March stated that he had received a
complaint in regards to the appearance of the old site and recommended that the City research the
possibility of having the fire department use the building for fire practice.
Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Travis to allow the old.
concession stand buildin~ to be relocated to the new Public Works site. All in favor. Motion
carried unanimously.
Mayor Wilharber requested that Council approve signage for the new Public Works site and the
Centennial Lakes Police substation. Signage will be similar in size, material, etc. to that of other
signage on City property.
Motion by Council Member Travis. seconded by Council Member Sweeney to authorize
Mayor Wilharber to contract for si!!:ns for both the new Public Works site and the
Centennial Lakes Police substation. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Wilharber stated he had spoken with Father Fitzgerald previously and Council had
authorized Mr. March to draft a letter in regards to the likelihood of a land swap or purchase of
land for the purpose of a Community Center. The Archdioceses has authorized the church to
proceed if deemed appropriate.
Mr. March suggested authorization by Council to obtain an appraisal of the church property and a
duplex located on the same block. Council Member Sweeney stated that he would like to have the
entire block appraised as he believes the City would need to purchase same in order to make the
Community Center a reality.
Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Travis to authorize
Staff to obtain an appraisal for the block containing the church property and the duplex. All
in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Page 13 of 14
Mr. March stated that the proposed, decorative lighting for the Hunter's Crossing Development
would cost approximately $18,000 more than standard lighting.
Council Member Sweeney questioned the amount of light radiated by decorative versus standard
lighting and also questioned the amount of vertical light being emitted. Mr. March stated he was
unsure of the specifications of either lighting options.
Mayor Wilharber questioned whether or not there was lighting on City trails ways. Mr. Palzer
stated there was not.
Mr. March stated he had received a contract for lawn care services for the next year from Valley
Creek Lawn and Landscaping. Mr. March stated that the hourly rate had not increased in three
years and questioned Council as to their intentions in receiving additional bids prior to renewal of
same.
Mayor Wilharber stated that he preferred to receive an addition two (2) bids. A consensus was
reached to direct Staff to solicit two (2) additional bids.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis to adjourn the
October 11, 2000 City Council Meetinl!: at 9:07 D.m. All in fayor. Motion carried
unanimously.
Transcribed by:
Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
Page 14 of 14
r
I '
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 25, 2000
6:00 p.m.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly sch
meeting on October 25,2000, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street.
PRESENT: Mayor Tom Wilharber
Council Member Dick Travis
Council Member Terry Sweeney
Council Member Linda Broussard Vickers
ABSENT: Council Member Mari Nelson
STAFF:
I.
II.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
Mayor Wilharber requested the following changes: Remove reference on Page 3 to Mrs.
Salazar as she was not present at the public hearing; indicate on page 6 that Mr. Peterson
indicated the cost for the additional trail way could be born by the developer; on Page 7
correct the spelling of John to "Jon"; on Page 8 change the comment by Mayor Wilharber
Page lof8
,
to indicate only two (2) police vehicles will be parked at the public works building; on
page 13 to reference the Lion's storage building rather than the old, red, concession
stand.
Council Member Sweeney requested the following changes: On page 6 change Council
Member Sweeney's comment regarding Parks & Recreation Committee to indicate Parks
& Recreation was unaware of a width difference in the trailways when the trailway was
approved; change the language of the paragraph concerning additional cost to maintain
the wider trailway to specify that the City will not really incur any additional costs to
widen the trailway as the trail will have to be maintained despite the width; on page 9
change the motion regarding Trio Inn to read as a "fine" not a "donation". Also correct
motion to read by Sweeney, seconded by Travis, with a friendly amendment by Mayor
Wilharber, agreed to by Sweeney and Travis to draft a letter from the City to the State
regarding the imposed fine; Page 13, in the motion by Sweeney, correct the motion to
include the request for an appraisal of the entire block including all the houses on the
block, the duplex and the church property.
Motion by Council Member Sweenev. seconded bv Council Member Travis to
approve the October 11, 2000, City Council Meetinl!: Minutes with the noted
chanl!:es. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
The City of Centerville October 12. through October 25. 2000
Motion by Council Member Sweenev, seconded bv Council Member Travis to
approve the expenditures for the City from October 12, 2000 throul!:h October 25.
2000. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Centennial Fire District Expenses
Mayor Wilharber noted the equipment cost of $181,630.00 was for the purchase of the
new fire engine tanker with a 65' ladder.
Council Member Sweeney indicated a call was received for assistance with the Carlos
A very wildfire on Thursday afternoon. He indicated the main firefighting effort for the
Centennial Lakes Fire District was from Thursday afternoon all through the night into the
early morning hours of Friday. The tanker was then used Friday through Sunday to assist
in fighting the fire.
Mayor Wilharber thanked the firefighters for their efforts.
Motion bv Council Member Sweenev. seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to approve the Centennial Fire District Expenditures in the amount of
$185,094.44. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Page 2 of8
VII. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS
Intihar Complaint - Center Street Drivewavs Heaving
Mr. March presented to Council pictures of the Intihar driveway showing, approximately
a three by three foot section at the end of the driveway that had heaved making the
driveway almost unusable.
Mayor Wilharber stated that he had spoken to the homeowner when he stopped to check
on the driveway. The homeowner indicated to Mayor Wilharber it was his intent to
replace the driveway, but wanted to be sure the problem at the end of the driveway was
solved prior to doing so.
Mr. Peterson questioned Mr. Palzer whether drain tile had been placed at the end of the
Intihar driveway. Mr. Palzer stated that it was his belief there was drain tile in place and
that it was three (3) or four (4) feet below grade.
Mayor Wilharber questioned where the drain tile directed the water. Mr. Palzer stated
that it is directed west to the drainage ditch and then to a catch basin.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned if the driveway had heaved due to the
drain tile placement or if the drain tile was installed in an effort to keep the driveway
from heaving.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned City requirements to repair the lower
portion of the driveway. Mr. Palzer recommended replacing the lower portion with class
five for winter and working jointly with the homeowner in the spring when they intend
on replacing the entire driveway.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned if it was the City's responsibility to repair
the driveway and whether or not the remaining portion of the driveway could also heave
as a result of the base under the asphalt. Mr. March stated that the driveway has
experienced heaving in the drain tile area only. Mr. Palzer stated that Center Street, in
the area being discussed, rises approximately eight inches during winter.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned removal of the drain tile. Mr. Palzer
stated that the same drain tile was located on neighboring properties as well. Mr.
Peterson recommended using class five to seal the draintile to keep the water from
flowing through.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned whether the repairs needed to be
completed prior to winter or the possibility of waiting until spring. Mr. Palzer stated that
he would speak with the homeowners.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned whether other driveways in the area
would also need repairing.
Page 3 of8
Mayor Wilharber questioned whether the City had previously repaired other driveways in
the area. Mr. Palzer stated that the City had replaced three out off our driveways.
Council Member Travis questioned if Staff should consider receiving a quote to repair
the three (3) foot by three (3) foot section and offer the funds to the homeowner.
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Travis to direct
staff to obtain a Quote for repairs to the three (3) foot bv three (3) foot section of the
Intihar driveway and to inform the Intihars of the amount the City will reimburse
them subseQuent to the driveway bein!! reuaired. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Northern Forest Products - Tax Abatement
Mr. March stated that no official action was needed on the Northern Forest Products Tax
Abatement until the public hearing scheduled for November 8, 2000.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
1. Resolution 00-26 - Special Assessment Abatement
It has been brought to the City's attention that Special Assessments for the Parkview
Development were not removed from PIN #R23-3 1-22-3 1-0053 (6992 Meadow Circle)
on Anoka County's records following Burnett Title's payment in March of 1999 and are
showing on the property owner's statement of property tax payable in 2000.
Resolution 00-26 allows for the error to be corrected by Anoka County.
Motion bv Council Member Travis. seconded bv Council Member Sweeney to
apurove Resolution 00-26. as presented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
2. Resolution 00-28 - Electing to Continue Participation in the Local Housing
Incentives Account Program Under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded bv Council Member
Sweeney to auprove Resolution 00-28 as presented. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
3. Resolution 00-29 - Calling for a Public Hearing on Proposed Special
Assessments for Delinquent Sewer and Water Accounts and Other Outstanding
Balances Owed to the City by Individual Property Owner(s)
Mayor Wilharber stated that the list of homeowners with delinquent utilities appear to be
the same, year, after year. He then questioned whether homeowners could attempt to
claim the assessment as property tax paid, on their income tax returns. Council Member
Page 4 of8
Broussard Vickers indicated that homeowners may claim the assessment as property
taxes paid, but legally it is not allowed and would likely lead to an IRS audit.
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Travis to
ADDrove Resolution 00-29. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
4. Shoreview Good Neighbor Program
Mayor Wilharber read a letter received from the Shoreview Community Center regarding
their Good Neighbor Rate. Residents of the City of Centerville are entitled to receive a
15% discount on regular rates for seasonal or annual memberships. In return for the
discount, Shoreview has requested that the City of Centerville publish a four (4) inch by
four (4) inch advertisement provided by them in all City publications for one (1) year.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded bv Council Member
Sweeney. to DarticiDate in the Shoreview Good Neighbor Prol!ram bv al!reeinl! to
Dublish their provided advertisement in all City publications for one (1) year. All in
favor. Motion carried unanimously.
5. Force Main Issue (Mill Road and Peltier Lake Drive)
Mr. Peterson stated that there was a leak in the force main located at Mill Road and
Peltier Lake Drive recently. Mr. Peterson indicated that it was determined that the cast
iron pipe used for the main had pitted badly and was in need of repair. Mr. Peterson also
stated that the entire length of pipe is deteriorating and in need of repair. Mr. Peterson
stated he had received several quotes from contractors to repair the main by directional
boring so the blacktop would not be disturbed. The lowest bid received for a directional
bore with a 6" plastic pipe came from Penn Contracting. The bid was $58,752.
Mr. Peterson stated that Penn Contracting had indicated they would be able to start
construction the week of October 30, 2000.
Mayor Wi/harber questioned the amount of pipe being replaced. Mr. Palzer stated a 20-
foot section and the section under the culvert would be replaced.
Mayor Wi/harber questioned whether the increased pressure created by the new pumps
may have caused the pitting or deterioration of the pipe. Mr. Palzer stated that slight
hammering on the pipe does occur when the pumps stop.
Council Member Sweeney questioned where available funds would be expended from to
repair same. Mr. March stated that same would be expended from sewer funds.
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Travis. to
accept the directional bore bid submitted bv Penn Contractinl! in the amount of
$58.752 and directed staff to determine whether additional pipe in the area needed
to be reoaired or replaced. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Page 5 of8
1-
6. City Fire Truck
Mayor Wilharber gave a brief history of the storage of the 1950 Studebaker fire truck and
how it arrived on his mother's property. Mayor Wilharber stated that the truck had been
stored on the property for five (5) years. Mayor Wilharber stated that he has attempted
restoring the truck for inclusion in City functions and will also be attempting to restore a
horse drawn fire wagon.
Mayor Wilharber estimated the initial costs to restore the fire truck at $25, for primer and
red spray paint. Future costs may include a brake repair kit, ignition switch, keys and
restoration of the seats. Mayor Wilharber stated that he will report back to the Council
engine operation, if any, or if addition monies needed to be expending.
Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded bv Council Member
Sweeney. to authorize Mayor Wilharber to use one stall of the old Public Works
building to store and repair the 1950 Studebaker fire truck; to provide keys to the
buildinl!. heat to the buildinl! and the use of electricity for power tools; and to direct
Mavor Wilharber to keep a runninl! total of expenditures with a cap of $1.000. All
in favor. Motion carried. Mavor Wilharber abstained.
7. Rice Creek Watershed District Aopointment
Mayor Wilharber read a letter informing Council of the need to publish a notice of the
vacancy on the Board of Managers for the Rice Creek Watershed District. The City
needs to provide its nominee by November 15, 2000. Mayor Wilharber noted Mr.
Cardinal has served the Watershed District for many years and indicated it was his desire
to nominate Mr. Cardinal.
Consensus was to publish the notice of vacancy and determine whom to appoint to the
Rice Creek Watershed District based on applications received at the November 8, 2000
City Council Meeting.
X. CONSENT AGENDA
1. Resolution 00-27 - Providing for the Issuance and Sale of $650.000 General
Oblig.ation Improvement Bonds of2000 (Hunter's Crossing)
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers. to ApJ;lrove Resolution 00-27. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Xl. COMMITTEE REPORTS
Mayor Wilharber reported that the Centennial Fire District Committee has obtained a
new Polaris Ranger six (6) wheeled, all terrain vehicle with a 50-gallon water tank on the
back. The District also recently obtained Engine 21 which is a fire engine tanker with a
65' ladder.
Page 60f8
Mayor Wilharber stated that the Centennial Fire District Committee is in the process of
their year-end audit. Mayor Wilharber also stated that generators have been approved for
Centerville, Lino Lakes and Circle Pines included their generator in the initial station.
Mayor Wilharber stated that at least half of the funding for the new generators was
received from charitable gambling and the Cities paid the other half. Centennial Fire
District will be acquiring a Thermal Imaging Camera in the near future. The cost same is
$18,000 and the camera will be purchased by the Relief Association through charitable
gambling.
It was noted that the proposed county-wide radio system is expected to cost between $12
and $14 million dollars to implement.
Council Member Broussard Vickers reported that the Planning and Zoning Commission
has begun workshop sessions to discuss modifications to Ordinance #4 and proposed
Sign Ordinance.
XII. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
Mr. March stated that there was an article in the newsletter requesting applications from
residents interested in serving on the official Fete des Lacs Committee and five (5)
residents have responded. Mr. March stated that a total of seven (7) members are needed
to meeting Fete des Lacs by-law requirements and requested approval to extend the
deadline for applications until November 15, 2000.
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Travis to
extend the deadline to accept applications to serve on the Fete de Lacs Committee
until November 15.2000. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. March stated the appraisal of 7071 and 7073 Centerville Road has begun and the
appraiser would also begin the process for the church property and the agricultural
property owned by the church. Mr. March stated that the appraisal of the entire block has
been placed on hold until a specific plan in place for the block. The City may be required
to pay between $15,000 and $20,000 in relocations fees to individual property owners if
the City purchases the properties. Mr. March stated he would consult City Attorney, Jim
Hoeft in regards to avoiding additional costs associated with same.
Mr. March stated that the City has a Certificate of Deposit (CD) coming due shortly, in
the amount of $200,000. Mr. March stated he will be meeting with representatives from
County Bank to determine whether it would be in the City's financial interest to renew
the CD with its current bank or invest same with County Bank.
Mayor Wilharber stated that the ground breaking ceremony for County Bank would be
held on November 6, 2000 at II :00 a.m.
Mayor Wilharber stated that the City would need to contact the Fire Chief regarding the
bonfire planned for October 28, 2000 due to the burning ban.
Page 7 of8
Mayor Wilharber noted there would be an informational Parks and Recreation meeting on
October 26,2000 at 7;00 p.m. at City Hall to discuss the pros and cons of having a BMX
Bike Park or Inline Skate Park in the City.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council Member
Sweeney to adiourn the October 25. 2000 City Council Meetilll! at 7:18 p.m. All in
favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Transcribed by;
Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
Page 8 of8
+
,
CITY OF CENTERVlLLE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
SEPTEMBER 27,2000
6:00 p.m.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their
scheduled meeting on September 27, 2000, at City Hall, 1880 Main S
Bu iness a letter from Alexanda House,
Development, and a letter from the
PRESENT: Mayor Tom Wilharber
Council Member Dick Travis
Council Member Terry Sweeney
Council Member Linda Broussard Vic ers
Council Member Man Nelson
ABSENT: None
STAFF:
I.
II.
AU in favor. Motion carried
III..
r. Peterson explained to Council all improvements are in place within the
development with the exception of the streets and curbs. The paving of streets is
Page I of 12
f
scheduled for next week. Mr. Peterson explained how the City arrived at the
assessments figures.
Mr. Peterson stated that the total costs for Hunter's Crossing improvements are
$653,613. The developer has paid for half of the costs to extend services down
Centerville Road. The remaining half has been divided among individual
property owners who also benefited.
Kenneth Vanderbeek, 6892 Centerville Road, eXplained to Council numerous
problems he has endured during construction. He lost telephone and cable
services on four (4) occasions. At one point the telephone line was dropped onto
the power line creating a potentially dangerous situation if his wife or children
would have used the telephone. His tractor was damaged, requiring $150 in
repairs. The City also removed trees on his property without permission and
without an easement to do so. He mentioned to Council that he was aware
services were coming but disagrees with treating his lot as two (2) lots and
therefore assessing him for same. Mr. Vanderbeek explained due to the elevation
of the lot he believes the lot is non-buildable. Mr. Vanderbeek stated that it
would be cost prohibitive for him to make the property saleable, and he did not
intend on doing so and would not divide or split the property.
Larry Woiak, 6925 Centerville Road, stated he intends on contesting the
assessment believing that the cost is in excess of the increased property value the
services will bring.
Dale Greenwadt, 4697 - 3 16th Lane, Stacy, Minnesota, stated that the property he
owns on Centerville Road is rental property and his renters did not provide the
notice of assessments to him. He was unaware of the assessment in time to
submit his petition to contest the assessment.
Mayor Wilharber questioned Attorney Hoeft that due to Greenwadt's
circumstances, could Mr. Greenwadt still be allowed to file a petition against the
assessment. City Attorney Hoeft indicated Mr. Greenwadt would be allowed to
file a petition.
Council Member Sweeney asked whether the City had agreed to replace the trees.
Mr. Vanderbeek said they had. Council Member Sweeney then asked if the trees
were in the City right-of-way. Mr. Vanderbeek stated they were not.
Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned Mr. Peterson if it is standard
procedure to assess someone for two (2) stubs if the lot could potentially be
divided. Mr. Peterson confirmed. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if
the stub could be removed if that was the wish of the property owner. Mr.
Peterson confirmed.
Page 2 of 12
Mr. Woiak stated that the assessments are in excess ofreplacing the existing well.
Mr. Greenwadt stated he believed the price to replace an existing well be
approximately $4,000. Mr. Woiak stated that his well is only 12 years old and he
believes it will be a long time before it fails.
Council Member Broussard Vickers explained to the property owners that they
are paying up front for their next service when their wells fail. She told them that
wells do fail quite regularly and the cost to replace a well would exceed what they
have been assessed for services. She stated she did not like the original numbers
and feels the Council has shifted as much of the financial burden onto the
developer as possible. She then explained to the property owners that the City
can assess them if the property owner has a realized value, and she believes they
will realize a value when connecting to these services.
Council Member Nelson inquired if the assessment amount was divided among
the property owners by adding up the total number of feet of pipe for the
development and Centerville Road. Mr. Peterson explained the property owners
are being assessed for half of the cost to extend services on Centerville Road only.
Mr. Woiak told the City he has incurred numerous costs to clear the sewer pipe at
his residence and will submit a bill to the City to be reimbursed for the same as he
feels it is their responsibility.
Mr. Vanderbeek inquired if he would have to connect to the services as soon as
they become available. Mr. Peterson stated he would need to connect to sewer
service within a year of becoming available.
Council Member Broussard Vickers inquired when the services would be
available. Mr. Peterson told her January 1,2001.
Mr. Peterson stated the amounts being assessed are in keeping with standard
assessments for similar services in other communities.
Mayor Wilharber inquired as to why Mr. Woiak's services were previously placed
into the lot at an angle. Mr. Peterson explained that previous piping was
temporary until services were extended on CenterviIle Road.
Mayor Wilharber noted the previous owner ofMr. Woiak's property was hooked
up to City sewer for free because no one at City Hall knew the property was
hooked to the City's sewer system.
A question was raised by several property owners as to why property owners with
homes backing up to CenterviIle Road were not assessed. Mr. Peterson explained
only those properties with homes facing CenterviIle Road were assessed. The
residents whose homes back up to Centerville Road will be assessed when
services come down the street their homes face.
Page 3 of 12
Mr. March provided paper to the property owners who had stated they wished to
oppose the assessment. The property owners in opposition placed their names
and addresses on the paper and turned them in to Mr. March.
Mayor Wilharber closed the public hearing at 6:55 p.m.
Mayor Wilharber stated he understands the property owners' position as he will
be in their position in several years when services reach him. Council Member
Travis indicated that he recently has been assessed for services, is fully aware of
their costs and believes them to be fair and reasonable.
Council Member Sweeney indicated the assessment is less costly than replacing
an existing well and the developer has bore a larger portion of the costs to bring
services down Centerville Road. Council Member Sweeney also stated that
property owners in question would benefit from the services and concurred that
the assessments were fair and reasonable.
Council Member Broussard Vickers addressed the issue of Mr. Vanderbeek being
assessed for two (2) stubs at his property. She indicated the price for one (I) acre
lots is approximately $60,000 and believes the property's value could and would
be enhanced to be buildable. Ms. Broussard Vickers stated that in her opinion,
having the stub run to the property during this time would be less expensive than
having it run in the future. Ms. Broussard Vickers concurred that the assessments
were fair and reasonable.
Council Member Nelson told the Council she usually leans toward individuals
with her opinions rather than toward the developers; however, in this case she
believes the developer has been more than fair and concurred with the other
members of Council.
Mayor Wilharber stated that assessments are high due to the cost of labor and
supplies and that these same costs will continue to increase. Mayor Wilharber
concurred with the other members of Council.
Mr. Vanderbeek stated he had received an estimate for costs to connect to the
City's sewer system in the amount of $10,000. Council Member Broussard
Vickers questioned whether Mr. Vanderbeek wished installation of the second
stub. Mr. Vanderbeek declined.
Mr. Vanderbeek stated he could not afford the $10,000 assessment and questioned
the option of deferring connection for several years.
City Attorney Hoeft stated that deferral of special assessments is an option;
however, the City would prefer to discuss this issue as the assessment process
continues.
Page 4 of 12
City Attorney Hoeft advised the Council to approve the resolution as presented.
He indicated modifications may be included as part of settlement discussions in
the future.
Motion bv Council Member Sweenev. seconded by Council Member
Broussard Vickers to approve Resolution 00-21. AIl in favor. Motion
carried unanimously.
IV. APPEARANCES/AWARDS
Mr. Bruce Malec. Division Manager - Waste Management
Mr. Bruce Malec introduced Mr. Gary Boium to the Council as Waste
Management's new Municipal Marketing Manager. Mr. Malec stated that Mr.
Boium would make periodic visits to ensure that quality services are being
provided to the community.
Mr. Malec questioned whether Council had any issues of concern relating to the
haulers service and Council reiterated that they are pleased with the services they
and residents are receiving.
Mr. Malec thanked the Council for the compliments Waste Management received
and for the opportunity to service the community. Mayor Wilharber thanked Mr.
Malec for attending.
A consensus was reached to hear the Northern Forest Products Abatement from
Unfinished Business at this point in the meeting.
Northern Forest Products Abatement
Paul McDowell, Northern Forest Products, addressed the Council and outlined
plans for the expansion of his business. Mr. McDowell presented Council with
sketches of a proposed expansion plan for the current Northern Forest Products
facility.
Mr. McDowell stated that they have out grown their current facility and
expansion would provide a more productive/efficient facility. Mr. McDowell also
indicated that Northern Forest Products has an additional site outside of
CentervilIe and expansion of the current facility would allow combining of the
two facilities. Mr. McDowell stated that the proposed expansion would be 22,000
or 23,000 square feet and cost approximately $600,000 or $700,000.
Mayor Wilharber inquired if the detention pond would be able to handle the
runoff from the expansion area. Mr. McDowell said he would rely on the
recommendation of the City Engineer.
Page 5 of 12
Council Member Broussard Vickers inquired how far from the back of Mr.
McDowell's lot the building would be positioned. Mr. McDowell said he
believed it was approximately 70 or 80 feet from the property line.
Mr. March noted the public hearing on the five-year tax abatement is scheduled
for October 11,2000.
Mayor Wilharber inquired as to how many employees Mr. McDowell planned to
add with the expansion. Mr. McDowell stated five (5) or six (6) within the next
five (5) years, depending on business.
Mayor Wilharber questioned the amount of off site business being combined in
the expanded facility. Mr. McDowell stated approximately seventy (70) percent
of the business would be combined and the other portion would remain at that site
due to rail transportation conveniences.
V. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
The following changes were requested by Council: Page 2, fourth paragraph
change "Ramsey County" to "Anoka County", Page 22 change "QUAD meeting"
to "QUAD Community Press", Page 20, eighth paragraph beginning with "Mr.
Palzer indicated" change the paragraph to read: "Mr. Palzer indicated there
would be new regulations forthcoming regarding lots of one (I) acre or more and
Council wanted to comply with the upcoming regulations." Also in the same
paragraph change "Rice Creek" to "MPCA".
Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Travis
to annroye the Sentember 13. 2000. City Council Meetin!! Minutes with the
noted chanees. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
The City ofCenterville September 14. through September 27. 2000
City Attorney Hoeft discussed a pending case before the Minnesota Supreme
Court he is arguing and has been preparing for. The case is a DUI case in which
the drivers vehicle was forfeited and storage costs were incurred. The person
whose vehicle was impounded is attempting to get the City to pay the storage
costs of $6,000. City Attorney Hoeft noted that his most recent billings included
additional time due to these circumstances.
Page 6 of 12
Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member
Broussard Vickers to aDprove the eXDenditures for the Citv from September
14. 2000 throul!h September 27. 2000. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimouslv.
Centennial Fire District Expenses
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member
Broussard Vickers to approve the Centennial Fire District expenditures in
the amount of $5.583.75. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
20th Avenue Water/Sewer Final Pay Estimate
Mr. Peterson indicated the project has been completed since 1998 and the City has
been withholding payment from Bonine Excavating, Inc., until several issues
were resolved. Mr. Peterson stated that Ms. Nancy Bonine recently contacted him
and indicated willingness to waive payment of $14,969.14 that was at issue and
requested payment of the $21,288.78. Mr. Peterson recommended payment of
$21,288.78.
Mayor Wilharber inquired to whom the check should be made payable to. Mr.
March indicated he is waiting for instruction from City Attorney Hoeft. City
Attorney Hoeft noted that the City has received two (2) separate Notices of
Levy's against monies owed to Bonine Excavating and the two agencies will be
receiving the money in lieu of Bonine.
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Travis
to approve payment 0($21.288.78 as the seventh (7) and final pavment on the
20th Avenue water/sewer utilitv improvements. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
VII. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS
Council Member Nelson inquired as to the status of the Salazar's dogs, Nikita and
Dakota. Council Member Nelson stated that she has driven past the Salazar's
house and noted the pen was not in compliance with Council requirements.
Mr. March reported to Council the Salazars began construction of a fence
impeding the street right-of-way by one (1) foot without applying for a variance,
and the City placed a stop work order on the site. Subsequent to numerous
telephone conversation with Mr. Salazar, Mr. Salazar has assured Mr. March that
he will keep the dogs in the house excluding relief periods. Mr. March stated that
he attempted to mail a certified letter to the Salazars in regards to non-compliance
of the dog kennel; however, it was not picked up at the post office. Mr. March
stated he had a Centennial Lakes Police Officer serve the letter on a juvenile at
Page 7 of 12
the residence. The Community Service Officer returned the next day and picked
up the signed card acknowledging receipt of the letter. Mr. March explained to
Council the letter informed the Salazars of the requirements of Council in regards
to the kermel, and also noted the procedures for applying for a variance to
continue construction of the fence.
Council Member Nelson questioned Mr. March if the police could patrol, and if
they were to notice the dogs out side of the kermel, could the dogs be seized and
further action taken. Mr. March referred the question to City Attorney Hoeft.
City Attorney Hoeft indicated it would need to be determined if the Salazars were
in violation of the requirements prior to action being taken. Mr. Hoeft stated there
is no reason why the Centermial Lakes Police Department (CLPD) could not be
asked to keep an eye on the dogs.
Council Member Nelson stated she would like to make the CLPD aware of the
situation and ask them to routinely check the property. Mayor Wilharber, as
police liaison, stated he would contact CLPD and forward the request.
VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Storm Sewer Re-alignment - Llovd Drilling (1873 Main Street)
Mr. Peterson recommended that the east half of the site drain east towards Shad
Avenue. The runoff can be collected in a storm sewer catch basin at Shad Avenue
and Main Street, flow east in the ditch, then flow south under the highway to an
existing pond at the southeast corner of Main Street and the Fire Station driveway.
The water will be treated prior to continuing southward to Clearwater Creek.
The west half of the site will receive adequate treatment on-site in the existing
highway ditch and the grassy area around the "beehive" catch basin at the north
property line. Mr. Peterson stated it is not necessary to redirect the storm water
flowing in the existing pipe south under the highway and into the small pond
south of the City Hall parking lot.
Council noted there has been a water problem on Shad Avenue in the past and
requested that Mr. Peterson check with Dave Lutz on Shad Avenue to make sure
redirecting the sewer in this marmer will not cause further water problems for the
residents on Shad Avenue.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis.
to approve the Storm Sewer Realignment at 1873 Main Sf. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimouslv.
Letter from Frank Ball. Director. Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division.
Mirmesota Deoartment of Public Safetv.
Page 8 of 12
Mr. March reviewed with Council the letter received from the Alcohol and
Gambling Enforcement Division and requested direction from the Council as to
how the City should respond.
Council Member Sweeney inquired if this was the first known violation for the
Trio Inn and, if so, what the business has done to ensure the violation will not
occur again. Council Member Sweeney stated that in his opinion, if this incident
is the first violation he would prefer not to fine the business.
City Attorney Hoeft told the Council they were under no obligation, based on the
letter, to impose a civil penalty. He indicated the letter should not be perceived as
a threat to impose a penalty but noted the State of Minnesota does have the
authority to impose a fine whether the City chooses to or not.
Council Member Sweeney stated he would rather impose a nominal fine and not
pull the business' license than have the State impose a higher fine and revoke the
business' license.
Council Member Broussard Vickers inquired as to how someone can be fined for
being charged with an offense, but found not guilty. Attorney Hoeft explained the
law does allow for civil penalty when you are charged with an offense. He used
the example of when someone is arrested for DUI they are charged with an
offense and lose their civil driving privilege. In some cases they are found not
guilty but they have still lost their driving privilege.
Mayor Wilharber noted the Council had waited until the matter was resolved in
the courts and ruled that because the bartender was found not guilty they would
not impose a fine. City Attorney Hoeft explained the State response recognizes
there is a difference between being found not guilty of the offense and being
innocent of noncompliance with the law.
Mayor Wilharber indicated he would prefer the City impose a penalty rather than
the State.
Council Member Nelson stated she did not like the tone of the letter and
expressed a desire to revisit the idea of fining the business. She indicated she felt
that in light of the fact the business owner is not denying the violation, she feels
there should have been a penalty imposed.
Mayor Wilharber clarified the owner of the bar was not at the establishment when
the violation occurred and the bartender was the one charged with the offense.
City Attorney Hoeft said it may be possible to impose a nominal fine on the
business to pre-empt action by the State. City Attorney Hoeft offered to research
M.S. Chapter 340A.415 and bring a definitive answer to the Council at the next
meeting.
Page 9 of 12
Council Member Broussard Vickers noted her dislike of the tone of the letter.
She stated if the consensus of the Council was not to fine the business she
proposes a letter be drafted to the State in response outlining the fact that the City
has chosen not to impose a penalty and give the reasons the Council choose to
decline.
Motion bv Council Member Travis. seconded by Council Member Sweeney
to table the dramn!! of a response to the Alcohol and Gamblin!! Enforcement
Division to the October 11. 2000 Council Meetin~ to allow time for City
Attornev Hoeft to review M.S. Chapter 340A.415. All in favor. Motion
carried unanimously.
Letter from Alexandra House
Mayor Wilharber read a letter from Alexandra House requesting the Council
declare the month of October Domestic Violence Awareness Month.
Motion bv Council Member Travis. seconded bv Council Member Sweeney
to declare October Domestic Violence Awareness Month. All in favor.
Motion carried nnanimously.
Letter from Anoka County Community Development
Mayor Wilharber read a letter from Anoka County Community Development
proposing modifying the way Community Development Block Grant funds
(CDBG) are distributed throughout the County.
Mr. March explained to Council he had attended a meeting regarding the matter
and said under the proposed modifications, Centerville will compete with cities of
comparable size for CDBG funds.
Letter from Minnesota House of Representatives
Mayor Wilharber read a letter received from the Minnesota House of
Representatives regarding a series of town meetings scheduled to discuss
proposed modifications to, and the effectiveness of the Metropolitan Council.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
St. Genevieve's Land Inquiry Letter
The Council discussed a letter drafted by Mr. March to St. Genevieve's Catholic
Church requesting church officials meet with City officials to discuss plans for
future redevelopment.
Page 10 of 12
Mayor Wilharber requested that a notation be included that he had spoken with
Father Fitzgerald in regards to this matter in the past.
Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Nelson
to approve sendine: the letter with the noted addition to St. Genevieve's
Catholic Church. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
X. CONSENT AGENDA
Xl. COMMITTEE REPORTS
Mayor Wilharber reported he was unable to attend the Police Commission
meeting but had visited with the Chief of Police and will prepare a written report
for Council.
XII. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
Mr. March reported he received a letter from Mr. Sheehy who is interested in
donating 15 acres of land to the City. There are special assessments pending on
the property in the amount of $74,792 and Mr. Sheehy has agreed to pay 25% of
the assessments. Mr. March told Council he visually surveyed the site and feels it
is a beautiful nature area for a possible park or trail. The site also has potential for
a water tower which would be visible from 135. Mr. March stated that soil
borings could be done if Council desired.
Mayor Wilharber stated he would like to proceed as there are multiple ways the
City could use the property. .
Council Member Travis inquired as to whether there was a wetland delineation.
Mr. March told him Anoka County has declared it a wetland.
The consensus was to research the donation further.
Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Broussard
Vickers to accept the donation of land from Mr. Sheehy. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. March reported there is a "Meet the Candidates" program scheduled to be
taped for the cable access channel. Mr. March stated that he has requested a copy
of same specific to Centerville.
Council Member Sweeney requested anyone not receiving cable to contact him so
he could bring it to the attention of AT & T Broadband.
Mayor Wilharber reported that on several occasions he has discussed possible
trail connections with the City of Hugo. Mayor Wilharber stated that if water
Page II of 12
services and trail connections were made with neighboring communities, (Le.,
Hugo and Lino Lakes) it would be cost-effective.
XIll. ADJOURNMENT
Motion bv Council Member Sweenev. seconded bv Council Member
Broussard Vickers to adiourn the Sentember 27. 2000 City Council Meetin!:
at 8:33 p.m. AU in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv.
Transcribed by:
Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
Page 12 ofI2
-.. -.
NOT A~~~O~t~
CENTERVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITIEE
MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 17, 2000
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Centerville Economic Development
Committee held their regularly scheduled meeting on October 17, 2000 at City Hall,
1880 Main Street.
Present:
Chairperson Tim Rehbine
Committee Member Lori Dorn
Committee Member Paul Montain
Committee Member Michelle Moser
Committee Member Betsy Scheller
Absent:
Committee Member John Magill
Committee Member Mary Capra
Committee Member Dick Travis (Council liaison)
Staff:
Kris Sweeney
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Tim Rehbine called the meeting to order at approximately 7: 1 0 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
October 17, 2000, Economic Development Committee Meeting Minutes
Motion bv Ms. Moser. seconded bv Ms. Dorn to approve the October 17. 2000.
Economic Development Committee Meetin2 Minutes. All in favor. Mr. Montain
abstained. Motion carried.
APPEARANCES
Mayor Wilharber appeared at approximately 8:20 p.m. He commented on the next phase
of Center Oaks and how more expensive the homes will be. This will also help in
creating new businesses in town.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Desig:n Team - "Ideas in Action"
Historical Markers - No report was given.
. ~
Downtown Revitalization
NOT m~O~f~
Mr. Rehbine mentioned that he hadn't heard anything new on the downtown
revitalization grants. Ms. Scheller stated that this grant was put into the planning stages
not the development stages.
Ms. Dom mentioned that we did receive a $500.00 grant from State Farm Insurance as
originally thought. They only issue them twice a year. Ms. Dom explained she had spoke
with Mr. March regarding the grant.
Mr. Montain remarked on the LaMotte Building and how nice it was. He also commented
on the downtown area and how it has improved in the past 10 years.
Ms. Dom asked Mr. Montain about his building. He mentioned that he is going to do
some improvement, but currently he had to put in a new heating and cooling system. He
is planning on installing new awnings, a clock, and new driveway.
Ms. Scheller stated that she visited R & K Cafe and Catering. They have repainted it
inside; and that the french toast was excellent! She did mention that she talked to Kathy,
on of the owners, and Kathy stated they were looking into remodeling the Cafe into an
arcade. They would sell hamburgers and fries and make it more teen oriented.
Mr. Montain answered Ms. Moser's questions regarding the Dairy Queen. Apparently
Gerald Rehbine is having trouble with the City ofLino Lakes and the flood plain issue.
They are still interested. There was discussion about the proposed grocery store/strip
mall going in behind the new County Bank. It was thought that it is still in the
demographic study stage.
Ms. Capra submitted a memo regarding the grand opening of the LaMotte Building to
providing refreshments. The committee thought is was a good idea, but there were
concerns with some of the members about playing fuvoritism. They agreed to the
exception of$80.00 to $100.00 for the LaMotte Building due to the filet that there will be
four businesses located there. In all other cases the cost should be between $20.00 to
$30.00 per business.
A motion was made to have the refreshments catered by R & K Cafe and Catering
for the grand opening of the LaMotte Building. Motion by Mr. Montain, seconded
by Ms. ScheUer. Motion carried unanimously.
The committee discussed setting a standard on giving out welcome packets, cards, gifts
and staying within a certain dollar value of approximately $20 to $30.
A motion was made by Ms. Scheller to set a standard monetary value on the
welcome pacts, cards, and gifts for new business. Mr. Montain seconded. All in
favor. Motion carried unanimously.
.
. .
Star City Goals
NOT A~r~OVt~
Ms. Scheller contacted the Wargo Nature Center and was told someone would get back to
her and they did not. She was she will be calling them regarding winter activities.
The committee discussed several different possibilities (example: snow sculptures and
light contest). Mr. Montain suggested that this would be more in the line of the Fete de
Lacs Committee or the Park and Recreation Committee than business related. The
committee decided that they were not going to do any winter activities for this year.
They would start planning for next year.
Ms. Scheller stated that Ms. Capra suggested that EDC have a winter Business
Appreciation night with hot chocolate and treats, because there are businesses that we
missed in the spring.
Mr. Montain stated that the EDC goal was to maintain our current businesses and reach
out to the new businesses in town.
Welcome Neililibor Packets
Ms. Scheller asked if anyone brought a welcome packet over to Embers. It was
mentioned that Ms. Capra picked up mugs, but it was unknown whether they were
delivered to the new businesses. Mr. Rehbine suggested that they touch base with Ms.
Capra.
City Merchandise
Mr. Rehbine was interested in the amount of inventory that was left and if they needed to
order any more.
NEW BUSINESS
Mr. Rehbine suggested that the EDC invite new or current business owners once a month
to an EDC meeting to discuss their needs, or offer their suggestions. It was agreed that
they would allow approximately 15 minutes for the business owner to speak at the
beginning ofthe meeting. It was also agreed that each committee member would rotate
inviting new or current businesses. Ms. Dorn offered to set up a business for November.
Mr. Rehbine mentioned that this week was Minnesota Manufacturer's Week and that a
certificate was being set out to the manufacturers in Centerville. Governor Jesse Ventura
signed this Certificate. A short letter was sent with the Certificates and the Proclamation
that was signed by the Governor.
Lino Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce was mentioned. Ms. Capra had questions but
was not able to attend this meeting. Mr. Rehbine stated that he received a call regarding
the Lino Lakes Area Chamber and wanted more information on the Chamber. He also
stated that EDC and the Chamber are similar groups and that is why the City of
Centerville joined.
~OT Arr~O~t~
The 2001 Budget was discussed. The committee needed more information for the
November meeting.
Other New Business:
Mr. Montain questioned when the Citizen and Business Persons of the Year Certificates
were given out. This year, they were handed out at the Fete de Lacs. The committee was
unsure of the policy in the past, and requested more information at the next meeting so
they can recommend when they would like to see the awards presented.
The committee questioned when the to vote for chairperson would take place and also
requested copies of the by-laws in the next packet.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion bv Ms. Dorn. seconded bv Mr. Montain to adiourn the October 17. 2000.
EDC Medin!!. All in favor. Motion carried unanimousIv.
Meeting adjourned at approximately 8:45 p.rn.
Respectfully submitted:
Kris Sweeney
City Staff
,
NOT
APPROVED
PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
November 1, 2000
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof; the Parks and Recreation Committee of the City
of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on November I, 2000 at City Hall,
1880 Main Street. Chairperson Doug Porter called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.rn.
Present:
Chairperson Doug Porter
Wayne LeBlanc
Karla DeVine
Tedd Peterson
Brian Walter
Terry Sweeney (Council liaison)
Absent:
Staff. Jill Lien
APPEARANCES
Pheasant Marsh
Terry Ffannah from Ground Development and Troy Livgard from James R. Hill, Ioc.
(Project Engineer) appeared before the Parks and Recreation Committee to discuss the
preliminary plat for the proposed Pheasant Marsh development. Mr. Hannah, Mr.
Livgard and the Parks and Recreation Committee discussed the street layout, easements,
sidewalks, trail, parkland, and a bu.IIer between the Center Oaks development and the
new development. Mr. Livgard commented that the development would be built in
phases to accommodate the MUSA, which indicates that some of the property isn't
scheduled for development until the year 2005.
Mr. LeBlanc mentioned that he would like to see 10% ofthe land dedicated for park use,
and more specifically where the trail will be placed. Mr. Porter commented that he
would like the trail to connect straight across Centerville Road to the trail in the Hunters
Crossing development.
The committee discussed at length, the placement of a park and whether the committee
should request money or park land from the developer.
I
...
Motion by Ms. DeVine, seconded by Mr. Porter to recommend to City Council to
request that Ground Development install a ten foot wide trail along the south side of
the Zerwas property; continuing along the east side, to the force main easement,
straight east to the end of the development; with an eight foot wide trail, south to a
future delineated park; also to include a $1500 park dedication fee per lot within the
Pheasant Marsh development. Porter, Walter, Peterson, DeVine - aye. LeBlanc-
abstained. Motion carried.
Motion by Mr. Porter, seconded by Mr. Peterson to request the Planning and
Zoning Commission forward a revised copy of the Preliminary Plat for Pheasant
Marsh indicating trails, revised sidewalks and proposed park area in outlot A. All
in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
October 4. 2000 Parks and Recreation Committee Meetirn! Minutes
Motion by Mr. LeBlanc, seconded by Mr. Walter to approve the October 4, 2000
Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes. AU in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
OLD BUNlNESS
Follow-UD on Infurmational Meetiw for Skate ParkIBMX Track
The general consensus of the committee was that the Informational Meetiog was a great
success. Ms. Lien reported that there were over 40 people in attendance. Additionally,
most of the youth and their parents expressed interest in a skate park over a BMX track.
Mr. Peterson commented that perhaps the Lions Club would be willing to donate some of
their charitable gambliog proceeds towards the fimding of a skate park. Ms. DeVine
commented about the property behind City Hall as a location for a park. After
discussion, the committee felt there were too many safety concerns related to the fire hall
and parkiog lot. The committee elected to explore other areas within the city and make
the skate park a goal for the year 2001.
Proposed Trail Map - Review MaP from Engineer
The Parks and Recreation Committee reviewed the proposed trail map provided by Dan
Schluender (Bonestroo) and were very pleased with the results. The committee would
like to see the addition of all ponds (shaded in blue) indicated on the map. Ms. Lien will
submit the request to Mr. Schluender.
Tree Placement at Parks
Mr. Porter explained that most of the trees have been planted at the parks. There is one
tree that the committee would like to see moved at Tracie McBride Park that is too close
to the power lines. Approximately 30 trees have been planted, with the balance to be
planted in the spring.
2
! -
! .
Future Trails / Draft Trail Plan Undate
Mr. LeBlanc submitted an updated "Future Trails Plan" to be approved by the Parks and
Recreation Committee and forwarded on to the appropIiate parties involved.
Motion by Mr. Walter, seconded by Mr. Porter to allow Mr. LeBlanc to forward
copies ofthe proposed Future Conceptual Trail Map to the appropriate parties
involved. Walter, Porter, LeBlanc, Peterson - aye. DeVine - Nay. Motion carried.
2001 Budget
The Parks and Recreation Committee discussed the goals that were achieved in the year
2000, and were pleased that most of the goals were accomplished. Mr. LeBlanc
suggested the committee "brainstorm" on wbat they would like to see accomplished in
the year 2001. The committee compiled the following goals and contacts for the year
2001.
Goal
Curb / Gutter (LaMotte Park)
Skate Park (concrete rink, trail to rink)
Lighting
Electricity to ball fields (LaMotte Park)
81. Paul Water Utility Property
Timbers at McBride Park
Tennis Courts
Trail around Royal Meadows Park (wetland)
Trail at Eagle Pass (overlay)
Turf at all parks (replenish/weed control)
Satellites / Satellite enclosures (natural)
Park clean-up
Lions Club requests
NEW BUSINESS
Contact Person
Doug Porter
Jill Lien / T edd Peterson
Karla DeVine
Karla DeVine
Doug Porter
Brian Walter
Future discussion
Karla DeVine
Future discussion
Tedd Peterson
Brian Waiter
All
Future discussion
Hail Damage / RoofReDlacement
Mr. Peterson explained that last year when the bad stonus came through town there was
some hail damage to the buildings at Laurie LaMotte and Tracie McBride Parks. Mr.
Peterson questioned who is responsible for the repairs, adding that he felt insurance
should cover the repairs. After discussion, the committee requested Mr. Peterson talk to
Mr. March and Mr. PaIzer regarding the situation.
Ice Rink Attendants
The committee discussed the performance ofIast years' ice rink attendants, along with
issues and concerns that will need to be addressed with the upcoming new attenrlant~.
Mr. Peterson volunteered to supervise the rink attendants and overall upkeep of the rink
due to the fuet that he already visits the rink on a daily basis for maintenance purposes.
3
.
Ms. Lien explained that in the past, any attendant who is interested in working as an
attendant again in the current year has "seniority". The pay for the position was
advertised at $7.50 . $8.00 per hour, depending on experience. lithe applicant chooses
to come hack in the fullowing year, they would receive a pay increase of $0.25 per hour.
There has already been interest expressed in these positions.
Motion by Mr. Porter, seconded by Mr. LeBlanc to anthorize Ms. Lien to rnn an
advertisement for Ice Rink Attendants in the Qnad Community Press, the
LeJournal, the cable access channel, and on the reader board at City Hall;
requesting that applications be submitted to City Hall onlor before Wednesday,
November 29,2000. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Turkev Shoot
Ms. Lien explained that this was included in the packet fur infunnational purposes only.
The Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department is celebrating their 3m Annual Turkey
Shoot, and had faxed a copy of the notice to Ms. Lien. After discussion, the committee
elected to do nothing at this time.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
Parks and Recreation Montbty Reoort to Patricia Scott (LeJournal Editor)
Not discussed.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Mr. LeBlanc, seconded by Mr. Peterson to adjourn the November 1, 2000
Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 10: 1 0 p.m
Respectfully submitted,
Jill Lien
Staff liaison
4
~
NOT
APPROVED
.
PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
October 4, 2000
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Parks and Recreation Committee of the City
ofCenterville held their regularly scheduled meeting on October 4,2000 at City Hall,
1880 Main Street. Chairperson Doug Porter called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m.
Present:
Chairperson Doug Porter
Wayne LeBlanc
Karla DeVine
Tedd Peterson
Brian Walter
Terry Sweeney (Council Liaison)
Absent:
Staff: Jill Lien
Jim March (brief appearance)
APPEARANCES
Mike Ouiglev. Gor-Em Develonment - Eagle Park Sport / Tennis Court
Ms. Lien explained that after contacting Mr. Quigley earlier that day, he informed her
that he would not be able to attend the Parks and Recreation Meeting that evening. Mr.
Quigley faxed a letter to the Parks and Recreation Committee expressing his intentions
regarding the completion ofthe park in the Eagle Pass sub-division. Mr. Quigley is
currently evaluating the area required for the court to determine the possibility of
providing a regulation tennis court, as well as an additional smaller court area to be used
for a basketball area. Mr. Quigley is relying on the Parks and Recreation Committee's
knowledge of the recreational needs of the area to be the determining factor.
The consensus of the Parks and Recreation Committee was to determine if there is
enough space for both a regulation size tennis court, and a sport court. The committee
made the following motion:
Motion by Mr. LeBlanc, seconded by Mr. Walter to have Mr. Peterson and Mr.
Porter and any other available Parks and Recreation Committee Members, go to
Eagle Park on Friday, October 6, 2000 at 4:00 p.m. to look at the park layout and to
decide the feasibility of: 1) a regulation size tennis court, surface, fence and a
separate sport court; 2) tennis court alone; and 3) sport court alone. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimously.
I
..
~
The committee requested Ms. Lien contact Mr. Quigley to inform him of the Parks and
Recreation Committee's intentions.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
September 6. 2000 Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes
Motion by Ms. DeVine, seconded by Mr. Peterson to approve the September 6, 2000
Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes with noted addition. AU in
favor. Motion carried unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
Proposed Trail Map Discussion
Tabled
Informational Meeting for Skate Park / BMX Track for Parents and Youth
The committee discussed the "sample" flyers presented by Ms. Lien along with possible
dates and times to consider, and made the following motion:
Motion by Mr. Porter, seconded by Mr. Walter to have Ms. Lien distribute the flyer
to Centennial Middle School and Centerville Elementary School, to accept any
printing costs, and to publish the meeting in the LeJournal and the Quad
Community Press. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Turf Update (Laurie LaMotte Park)
Mr. Peterson explained that he spoke with Valley Creek, regarding aerating the soil at
Laurie LaMotte Park. During their discussion, Mr. Peterson learned that Valley Creek
was already planning on aerating the soil at City Hall. Valley Creek was willing to aerate
the soil at Laurie LaMotte Park for $27.50 per hour (approximately six hours). Aller the
aeration had been complete, Mr. Peterson learned that Valley Creek spent two (2) days
aerating the soil at LaMotte Park. Due to the fact that the soil was so hard, they had to
aerate it twice. Even though Valley Creek spent two (2) days at LaMotte Park, they only
charged the City for six (6) hours of labor.
Tree Placement at Parks - Maps
Mr. Porter had visited the parks prior to the meeting to sketch out each of the parks
existing trees. The committee elected to roughly "plot out" the placement of the 20
Autumn Blaze Maple trees that Mr. Goetz is currently holding for the City. There will be
four (4) trees planted at both Royal Meadows and Tracie McBride Parks, and seven (7)
trees planted at both Acorn Creek and Laurie LaMotte Parks. Eagle Park will not receive
any of the Autumn Blaze trees. Mr. Porter will contact Mr. Goetz regarding the
installation ot: and any suggestions he may have related to the trees and/or their
surroundings.
2
,
Motion by Ms. DeVine, seconded by Mr. Peterson to authorize Mr. Porter to work
with Mr. Goetz regarding the placement and installation of the 20 Autumn Blaze
Maple trees at the parks. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Lil!htin!!: of Parks / Police Grant
Mr. LeBlanc explained that he had contacted Chief Heckman regarding the possibility of
any type of grant funds being offered by the Police Department for lighting of parks.
Unfortunately, Chief Heckman was unaware of any such grant.
YMCA Uvdate
Ms. DeVine mentioned that she had contacted Craig Bode of the YMCA to learn why the
Summer Youth Programs were not offered at Laurie LaMotte Park as planned. Mr. Bode
explained that 25 registrations were needed in order to hold the classes and only 6 - 8
were received.
Bill Bisek's "Recreational Activity Director" Proposal Update
Mr. Sweeney explained the City Councils reactions to Mr. Bisek's proposal of becoming
the City's ''Recreational Activity Director". The Council felt it was great that someone is
willing to offer activities for both adults and youth, but the opportunity should be open
for all businesses within the community, not just one. In addition, both the Council and
the Parks and Recreation Committee expressed financial concerns about a local business
owner offering recreational activities through the City. The Parks and Recreation
Committee made the following motion:
Motion by Mr. Porter, seconded by Mr. Walter to request that Mr. March write a
letter to Mr. Bisek regarding City sponsored leagues vs. privately sponsored leagues,
indicating that the Parks and Recreation Committee will not sponsor any privately
organized leagues through the City. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
The general consensus of the Parks and Recreation Committee is to research the needs,
qualifications, pay, and responsibilities of Park Directors I Coordinators in the
surrounding communities. Mr. Porter will contact the University of Minnesota to explore
the possibilities of obtaining a paid intern with a degree in Parks and Recreation. Mr.
Porter will also contact Jim Hoeft (City Attorney) to discuss any liabilities involved, and
Barry Bernstein (Lino Lakes Recreation Program Supervisor) to discuss all of the issues,
concerns, pros and cons involved with a Park Director / Coordinator.
Future Trails Meeting Uodate
Mr. LeBlanc explained the meeting held on Monday, September 25lh was a great success.
The entire Parks and Recreation Committee along with representatives from Anoka
County, Washington County, Lino Lakes, Hugo, St. Paul Water Utility and the Rice
Creek Snowmobile Association were in attendance. All parties involved came together
to form a general vision of the future trail systems. Mr. LeBlanc will update the proposed
trail map and bring it to the November meeting.
3
,
Remainine Balance of the Parks and Recreation Budeet
Ms. Lien distnbuted an updated balance sheet provided by Ms. Bender indicating the
total assets, total expenditures and total fundsIbalance remaining in the Parks and
Recreation accounts. Mr. March explained the Capitol Improvement Projects, indicating
he would like the Parks and Recreation Committee to prioritize the list included and any
other projects they feel important. Mr. March also explained the increases in the
budgeted amounts. The Capitol Improvement Projects packet of infurmation was for
informational purposes only at this time, with the exception of prioritizing. The final
budget is due in December.
The Parks and Recreation Committee elected to visit all of the parks in Centervi1Je on
Saturday, October 28, 2000 at 8:30 a.m. to determine the goals of each park, and then to
have a workshop at City Hall to discuss the entire Parks and Recreation Budget for the
year 2001. The committee requested Ms. Lien notify the LeJournal and the Quad
Community Press.
Laurie LaMotte Park Lightinl!:
Mr. Peterson explained the light poles donated by Mr. DeFoe have all been relocated
except for one that is currently being used on Mr. DeFoe's property. In addition to the
donation of the light poles, Mr. DeFoe offered the scoreboard to the City. Mr. Peterson
mentioned that the actual cost of the relocation would be slightly higher than previously
quoted due to the additional expense of relocating the scoreboard.
NEW BUSINESS
Letter from Bert Casner Reeardine a Trail Between Oiibwav Road and Heritaee Street
Mr. Bert Casper (6979 Eagle Trail) e-mai1ed Mr. March requesting a trail be paved where
a path currently exists between the dead-end of Heritage Street (on the east side of
Centerville Road) and the curve on Ojibway Road. The consensus of the committee was
to write a letter to Mr. Casper thanking him for his interest in a possible trail and to notify
him that this will be discussed in the future.
Hunter's Crossing Bituminous Trail / Acorn Creek Park Trail
Mr. Tom Peterson (City Engineer) had sent a letter to Mr. Rick Carlson (Hunter's
Crossing developer) regarding the bituminous trails in both the Hunter's Crossing
Development and the trail around the playground equipment at Acorn Creek Park. In
addition, were bids from two (2) vendors for paving the trail around the play structure,
and a map of the park indicating the proposed work. The lowest quote of $ 10,000 was
from Arcade Asphalt, a local contractor from Centerville. The second quote of$17,347
was from Northdale Construction (Hunter's Crossing contractor).
Motion by Mr. Walter, seconded by Ms. DeVine to recommend to City Council the
acceptance of the bid from Arcade Asphalt in the amount of $10,000 for paving the
trail at Acorn Creek Park as indicated. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
4
I
I ,
Sheehy Land Donation
Ms. Lien explained that Mr. Cy Sheehy is willing to donate land located in the Industrial
Park area just behind Goetz Landscape and Northern Forest Products between 20th and
21 st Avenues to the City. It is currently a 20-acre parcel in which Mr. Sheehy would like
to donate 15-acres of. As indicated in Mr. March's Week in Review, if the City obtained
this 15-acres, we would have the future trail linkage area secured to traverse, and would
be consistent with the long-term trail plan to connect to the City of Hugo. The property
has a high potential for recreational uses, and could also be a site for a future water tower.
In addition, a local business owner has expressed his interest in purchasing or renting a
portion of this property from the City, ifwe accept the proposed donation. This was
presented to the Parks and Recreation Committee for informational purposes only at this
time.
Capitol Improvement Proiects
Discussed previously.
Ground Development Concept Plan
The committee discussed the proposed Ground Development Concept Plan for the
property located just south of the Center Oaks Development. Ground Development is
proposing 17,500 square foot minimum lots. The committee was not in favor of the
proposed Ground Development Concept Plan as presented.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
Parks and Recreation's Monthlv Reoort to Patricia Scott (LeJournal)
The committee directed Ms. DeVine to focus most of the monthly Parks and Recreation
update on the Skate Park / BMX Track Informational meeting to be held on Thursday,
October 26, 2000 at 7:00 p.m.
Motion by Mr. Porter, seconded by Mr. Peterson to adjourn the October 4, 2000
Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jill Lien
Staff Liaison
5
Page 1 of2
Jim March
To: WIR Subscribers
Subject: Week in Review
Week in Review
November 9. 2000
Building Permits this Period = 7
Building Permits YTD = 176
New Homes Year to Date = 48
AA4AAAAA**********AAAAAAAAAA****LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA111111********1111114******1111111111************
. City Hall will be closed on Friday in observance of Veterans Day.
. Centerville Road was closed due to a sewer forcemain break earlier this week. The
leak was repaired and the road has been patched. The forcemain is owned by the
Metropolitan Council's sewer division. This is the forcemain that they are currently in the
process of replacing. I called the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to make sure that
they were investigating the spill.
. The election process went smoothly. No ballot boxes were lost and we obtained local
results days before national results were announced! Nice job to all of the election
officials. There was early morning and early evening congestion at the polls. We will look
at alternate polling locations for the next general election. I spoke to the Circle Pines
Administrator in regards to their elections. They have two polling places, but the same total
number of election booths as we own. However, we registered many more new voters than
they did which helps to congest the polling place. Centerville had approximately an 80%
turnout of registered voters.
. The groundbreaking ceremony was a success for the County Bank on Monday even
though the weather was not extremely cooperative. Footings were poured earlier this week
and it appears the foundation walls are going up quickly.
. The Planning and Zoning Commission meets on Tuesday of next week. The meeting
was rescheduled due to the general election. Council voted to reschedule the next Council
meeting to Monday, November 20th at 6:00 to avoid having a Council meeting the evening
before Thanksgiving.
· The Centerville Lion's may be once again distributing Thanksgiving baskets to needy
families. If you know of anyone that is having some financial difficulties and the Lion's
could assist them, please let me know.
· Enjoy your weekend!
ll/9/00
Page I of2
Jim March
To: WIR Subscribers
Subject: Week in Review
Week in Review
November 3. 2000
Building Permits this Period = 10
New Homes YTD = 47
Building Permits Year to Date = 170
AAAAAAA**********AA~AAA4AAA444********A.AAAAAAAAA*************AAAAA4All11AA~A****************************.*
* The Met Council forcemain broke yesterday near Cedar Street. The Met Council's
construction crew accidentally hit the old line while they were digging for the new line. The
spill was contained in the hole, cleaned up and the line was repaired.
* The sewer forcemain along Mill Road should be operational today. The contractor did
not run into any major problems with the project.
* There were some concerned residents near the intersection of Peltier Lake Drive and Mill
Road this last week. One of the residents was concerned that the sewer forcemain break
could have contaminated their well. The resident alerted the surrounding neighbors and
they all took their own water samples and sent them in to a lab to be tested. I received
calls from two residents that said their test results showed that their wells were
contaminated and that is was the City's fault. I discussed the Issue with the City Engineer
and our Public Works Department. Both agreed that it would be nearly impossible for the
sewer break which was contained and cleaned up to contaminate the wells. Irregardless, I
asked public works to take seven water samples around the intersection and send the
samples into our own lab in Fridley. All samples were returned absent of contamination.
We immediately notified the residents of the testing results. The lab that the homeowners
had used admitted to having a contaminated batch of samples. Their never was any
contamination and public confidence has been restored. Two of the residents have now
expressed interest in being provided with City water in the future.
* A demolition permit has been issued for the home across the street from City Hall. The
home is supposed to be removed within the next week.
* The Council Chambers has been set up for the general election on Tuesday. Remember
to vote and good luck to all candidates!
* The Lion's Haunted House was a success. Thursday night was a little slow, Friday was
better and Saturday was great! The Haunted House was busy from start to finish on Friday
night with people having to wait for hayrides. People were gathered around the large
1l/3/00
riigc ~ VJ .l-
bonfire all evening. I estimate that there were 400-500 people in attendance throughout
the evening. Donated food is being delivered to the foodshelf. The Haunted House made
approximately a $500 profit. Funds are being accumulated towards a shelter house in
LaMotte Park. Watch for upcoming fund raisers. The Lion's Cadillac Dinner is the next big
event along with a benefit steak fry that is scheduled for December 16th.
. I received the appraisal on the Turcotte duplex this morning. The appraised value is
almost identical to the asking price. I will be providing this information to City Council at
the next meeting.
. I have been informed that all of the City snowplowing equipment is ready and operational
in advance of any future storm. Hopefully this first big snowfall will hold off until well into
December!
· Enjoy your weekend!
1113/00
Page 1 of2
Jim March
To: WIR Subscribers
Subject: Week in Review
Week in Review
0cl00er 27, 2000
Building Permits this Period = 8
Building Permits YTD = 164
New Homes Year to Date = 44
.4444~4******.**********************************************AAAAAAll****************1&11.1..11&1.1.1*********
* The Planning and Zoning Commission has had two workshops and has two additional
workshops scheduled in regards to creating a new sign ordinance. It is expected that this
ordinance will be completed and ready to present to Council by the end of November. We
got a lot accomplished at our last meeting.
* The Park and Recreation Committee held a successful informational meeting last night.
The Council Chambers were filled to capacity by those interested in providing input on a
BMX park, skateboard park or in-line skating park. The committee is continuing to work on
a solution for this demonstrated need.
* The Lion's Haunted House is operating tonight and tomorrow evenings from 6:00 -9:00.
We have hayrides and free refreshments. A bonfire is also operating each night with the
community-wide bonfire scheduled for Saturday night. Bring a lawn chair and enjoy some
small town fun!
* The Centerville website has been completely updated with current information. We are
also planning to place approved minutes on the website as soon as possible. We have
been experiencing some technical difficulties with our community access channel. We had
Alpha Video come out to address the problem. We are planning to run the two candidate
tapes every hour on the hour up to election day. We plan to rebroadcast Council meetings
after the elections. We only have two tapedecks available for playback, so we are limited
in the number of tapes we can playback over the system at one time. We are ordering a
new supply of quality tapes to be used for recording meetings and events. The ones that
we have are old and are producing a less than desired end prodUCt. We will order the
tapes through the media center to receive a more favorable price on these tapes.
* The trail was paved this week in Acorn Creek Park. It turned out great. Arcade Asphalt
has always done a good job for the City.
* The County Bank is scheduled to open on Monday. Our local businesses are getting
very active right before winter starts. New landscaping is being completed in front of the
Northern Forest Products building. Goetz Landscaping is doing the job and is matching the
landscaping to the theme that they have in front of their own building. It looks great!
1 0127/00
--~-....~'V~ _
Automotive Driveline has picked up a building permit for a 4000 square foot addition to
their building. The pUblic hearing is set for the tax abatement hearing for the proposed
25,000 square foot expansion to the Northern Forest Products building.
* I was having lunch today with my wife and daughter at Embers. I saw Mary Capra and
Lori Dorn from EDC drop off a plant for their Open House. After Mary and Lori walked out,
I saw one of the owner's (Kathy) place the plant on the table at the entrance. She had a
grin on her face from ear to ear. I am glad that the EDC is doing this important work of
business appreciation. Anyone looking to open a business in our community is going to
stop at other local businesses to assess our local business climate and we need to
continue to work towards postive promotion. Nice Job!
. Enjoy your weekend!
10/27/00
Jim March
To: WIR Subscribers
Subject: Week In Review
Week in Review
October 19, 2000
Building Permits this Period = 6
Building Permits YTD = 156
New Homes Year to Date = 44
**********~AlAlll*************************************************************************************
.. I'm trying to get a jump on tomorrow's work, hence a late thursday edition of the Week in
Review.
.. We had a sanitary sewer forcemain break near the intersection of Mill Road and Peltier
Lake Drive. This line is going to be replaced. It is currently a heavily pitted cast iron pipe.
The new forcemain will be pvc and will be more resistant to corrosion. The leak was
contained and repaired and no sewage escaped downstream into Clearwater Creek.
.. New park equipment components have arrived to replace the sections of the climber that
were vandalized with graffiti from juveniles earlier this summer.
.. The petition in regards to the dangerous off-ramps at 1-35E and Main Street was
forwarded to Anoka County.
.. We have received building plans for the proposed County Bank facility. Craig Bode
indicates that electrical was installed to the portable facility today and they hope to be open
by the middle of next week.
.. Sketch plans were received for proposed expansions of the Automotive Oriveline building
and the Media Junction building on 20th Avenue. ADL is considering an approximate 4000
square foot expansion. Media Junction would like to add a second story to the office
portion of the building that they occupy.
.. Northern Forest Products has begun grading behind their existing building in advance of
their proposed 25,000 square foot expansion.
.. Terry Hannah (Ground Development) stopped in this afternoon to pick up an application
for a preliminary plat for the development they are considering south of Center Oaks.
.. The trail is supposed to be paved tomorrow or Monday in the Hunter's Crossing
subdivision.
10/19/00
-
.. The base work on the trail proposed for Acorn Creek Park is supposed to happen over
the weekend or on Monday. The dry weather has been cooperating with a lot of our
construction projects.
.. There is a candidate forum scheduled for next Monday night at City Hall at 6:30. This
question and answer forum is being sponsored and coordinated by the Lino Lakes Area
Chamber of Commerce. This will be broadcast five on the cable access channel. We
received the tape of the candidates from the North Metro Media Center last night. We have
intentions to broadcast this tape around the clock all weekend over our local access
channel.
.. The last I heard there were only two openings left for teams for Lion's Night Golf. This is
scheduled for tomorrow night at 6:30. If you want to golf, contact Bill at Kelly's.
.. Enjoy your weekend!
10/19/00
Page 1 of2
Jim March
To: Wayne leBlanc; Theresa Brenner; Tom Peterson; Tim Rehbine; Ray Devine; Michelle Moser; Lori
Dom; John McLean; Jim Hoeft; Hanna Tilsen; Brian Hanson; Patricia Scott; Elizabeth Scheller;
Doug Porter; Dave Kilian; Mary Capra; Aimee Fairbrother; City Council
Subjeet: Week in Review
Week in Review
October 13. 2000
Building Permits this Period = 7
Building Permits YTD = 149
New Homes Year to Date = 40
*********************************.************.**A~AAAAA*************************************AAAAAAAA********
. I had a meeting with Alicia Yap from the Ramsey County Regional Rail Authority. They
are conducting a study of the Rush Line Corridor that extends along 1-35 from 5t. Paul to
Hinckley. This corridor study is examining transportation issues such as dial-a-rides,
carpooling, park and rides and commuter rail. This study has been initiated through the
allocation of federal funds. They are in a fact finding mode right now. They will be
forwarding a draft study once it is completed. There are no funds currently available to
implement any of the potential suggestions or recommendations that will be presented in
the study.
* I have a meeting scheduled with Larry Neilson who is the legal representative for Sheehy
Construction. This meeting is scheduled for October 23rd. We will be discussing the
details of the proposed fifteen acre donation of Industrial land to the City.
* As directed by Council, I have ordered an appraisal for all of the properties on the block
which contains the old public works building. The appraiser will also be establishing a
value for the vacant agricultural property owned by the Church of 5t. Genevieve. It
appears that the local parish needs to internally decide whether to expand the current
church or build a new church on the property that is already owned by the church. If the
parish decides to expand the church, then we will have the appraisals ready and we will be
able to begin negotiations for a potential land swap or purchase.
* I attended the Fire Steering Committee yesterdayafternoon. Fire Chief Bennett was
authorized to purchase a hand-held thermal imaging unit. This unit was demonstrated to
the Committee. The product is used to locate individuals trapped in smoke filled buildings.
The unit was very sensitive and could pick up small variations in temperature. The unit is
also useful for identifying hotspots in a burning structure and has been credited for saving
several lives. The unit costs approximately $18,000 and was paid for entirely by charitable
gambling proceeds. The Committee also was able to view the newly delivered ladder truck
that was purchased. The ladder extends sixty-five feet and has a remote control nozzle on
10/13/00
1; 4i:$C ~ VI ~
the top of the ladder. This vehicle will be useful for conducting on-roof rescues within the
district. I will ask Milo if the fire department would be willing to use the nozzle on the
extended ladder to extinguish our community-wide bonfire on October 28th. I would think
that this would be a great way to display the capabilities of this new vehicle.
* The lift station at the intersection of Mill Road and Peltier Lake Drive is under
construction. The lift station is currently being bypassed with auxiliary pumps.
* The Met Council's sewer interceptor project is continuing to make progress. Construction
is underway on the lift station building near the entrance to LaMotte Park. The
interceptor is currently being jacked underneath 20th Avenue.
. Tomorrow evening the Rockin' Hollywoods will be playing outside at Kelly's Korner. The
Centerville Lion's will be selling benefit raffle tickets for John Rodewald. If you not show up
and I will sell you some raffle tickets.
* I have been contacted by the Lino Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce. They have come
forward to host a candidate forum for Centerville. I was informed this morning that the
event will conducted in the same manner and format as the Lino forum last year. The
Chamber will be contacting all candidates over the weekend. They have selected October
23rd, 6:30 at Centerville City Hall. If anyone has any questions they can contact Paul
Montain, Tim Rehbine or Julie Schwartz. The Chamber will be contacting the news media
to attend this event.
* Enjoy your weekend!
10/13/00
~
~
Page 1 of2
Jim March
To: WEtfne leBlanc; Theresa Brenner; Tom Peterson; Tim Rehblne; Ray Devine; Michelle Moser; Lori
Dom; John McLean; Jim Hoeft; Hanna Tilsen; Brian Hanson; Patricia Scott; Elizabeth Scheller;
Doug Porter; Dave Kilian; Mary Capra; Aimee Fairbrother; City Council
Subject: Week in Review
Week In Review
October 6, 2000
Building Pennits this Period = 3
Building Pennits YTD = 142
New Homes Year to Date = 40
AAAAAAAAAAllllAAAALAALAALAAAALLLAALLA4AJAAlLAALLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALAlAAlAAAAAA4AlllAAlAAAAAAALLLLA1AAAlllAA
* Ballfield lights from the Waterworks former ballfield were donated to the City and have
been moved and installed at one of the ballfields at LaMotte Park. Mr. DeFoe is also
donating the scoreboard from his field to the City.
* The temporary mobile banking facility for the County Bank was moved on to their lot on
Wednesday. They plan to have the mobile building anchored to the ground and will begin
operations in the temporary facility within the next couple of weeks.
* Curb and gutter has been installed in the Hunter's Crossing subdivision. Asphalt base is
planned for the next couple of weeks.
* The public works department has moved in to their new offices. Hydrants were also
flushed throughout the City this week.
* Two quotes were received for the paving of the path at Acorn Creek Park including the
path around the playground equipment. Arcade Asphalt quoted $10,000 and Northdale
Construction quoted a little over $17,000. Arcade Asphalt will be paving the trail after
Council approves the quote on Wednesday.
* The company from Iowa that is building the ladder truck for the fire department e-mailed
a picture of the new vehicle. Delivery is scheduled for next week.
* The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed a sketch plan for the former Gor-em
property south of Center Oaks. They are proposing an 88 lot subdivision on approximately
55 acres. The Planning Commission provided many comments on the proposed
subdivision. Ground Development is the name of the company interested in the property.
The average size of the proposed lots is a little over 19,000 square feet.
. A Council workshop was held Wednesday evening. We discussed the 2001 budget and
10/6/00
~
Page 2 orT--~
began discussions of prioritizing projects that were proposed in a draft five year Capital
Improvement Plan.
* Have a good weekend and enjoy the snowflakes!
10/6/00