HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-03-12 REMINDER
STRATEGIC
PLANNING
MEETING
MARCH 8, 1997
7:30 AM
A
•
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 12, 1997
CALL TO ORDER
CONSIDERATION FOR LOT SPLIT
1. Tourville property
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. City Council Meeting of February 12, 1997
2. City Council Meeting of February 26, 1997
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
1. City of Centerville - February 26 - 28
2. City of Centerville - March 1 - 12
2. Centennial Fire District - March
SET AGENDA
PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS
APPEARANCES
1. Kathryn Force of MSA - Water Supply Plan
2. Mike Black - Royal Oaks Realty
3. Mary Capra - Welcoming service
OLD BUSINESS
1. Letter - Dean Johnson
2. Letter - City of Hugo dam design
3. Union Contract
NEW BUSINESS
COMMITTEE REPORTS
ADMINISTRATOR REPORT
CONSENT AGENDA
ADJOURN
•
Dan Tourville has requested approval for a lot split. Mr. Tourville would like to separate
,7 acres from the parent parcel of 20 acres. A developer is interested in purchasing about
19 acres. Planning and Zoning are scheduled for a Lot Split Public Hearing on March
11th. Therefore, a Planning and Zoning recommendation will be submitted to the Council
during the Wednesday, March 12, Council Meeting. Mr. Tourville will be present to
answer any questions.
. tervitle 1880 Wain Street • Centerville, 55038
Established 1857 CITY OF CENTERVILLE (612) 429 -3232 • Fax (612) 429 -8629
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE OR REZONING
VARIANCE FEE /-
CtSrsPirr
R€ZO G V DATE PAID caiS /cj.
STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY: '9v - , ' rat- LLB di D .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY:
,V �y o ` .vim cF J 2 /y /F i 3 9/ aa,
SIZE OF PARCEL (S) c;?.?:" deA'is — vas ,. 7
PROPERTY OWNER: Zfl.✓ LE-&- PHONE # /a r!-
FEE OWNER: J�}�
ADDRESS:
APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY:
X FEE OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER
LEASE HOLDER OPTION TO PURCHASE
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: ��u<<s -- T y 4 7 � o u , 4 c i o s e y � s i P / � r r —
u � l d i t . . / 47. 4.2
j j i J , P � � r � h i a i r L� i � a A 3 s r P . a F 672 .3 ' — - ny —re -¢ 4 - ,✓g
fT s7 /eac /` 4?.fl' e
REASON FOR REQUEST:
�- ,•1y.7 .t��.� ipF /o �i¢iPG' &- ph ._
7 * Plus any additional costs
Si nature of applicant incurred for engineering,
legal fees, publication or
Signature of pro erty owner other requirements.
<Vas
Date
r .. 'S---) \° pag ? of 9 bit
wil■ Oar Vi _ W
w _
. Cis a8'.�.. - -. - _ � .
4 i XX CatelYULC Rte 1 1 ,' tem"- 130'
I X
L on t ptt yt 41A
(� 'f
el • ! • e C t is ‘kraas age 1:4, Astor.
Cex. +elviltc k
(ott e. fat. tiae►-fri i l fit "•
Cs fb,t ‘ 4.4.60 w gaze l )
1
C2: i., eutta►� .
t`_ 3 ,b
•
Stitt, 4144#0.4s ' \.: 1 jo ova, A . i
t .. (Tho
" 66a. -d9 — "
RTC %111X1 0
.1
DATE: March 6, 1997
TO: City Council
City of Circle Pines
City Council
City of Centerville
City Council
City of Lino Lakes
FROM: Milo Bennett
SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures
and approval for payment of
March expenses.
Your approval of March expenses as listed on
the attached copy of the check register, checks
#8863 - 8886 and #11465, in the amount of
$ 12,480.63 is hereby requested.
MB /al
cc: 7 Circle Pines City Council
7 Centerville City Council
7 Lino Lakes City Council
2 File
03/05/97 at 06:18PM CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT PAGE 1
RANK CHECK REGISTER
Checking account
All Periods Up To 03/31/97
CHECK NO DATE TYPE PAID TO / DESCRIPTION CHECK AMOUNT
8863 02/27/97 AP -D DISTRICT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 110.00
8864 03/05/97 AP -D LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 6,227.00
8865 03/05/97 AP -D SUNSHINE LIGHTING CO, INC.
8866 03/05/97 AP -D MOORE MEDICAL CORP 216.52
8867 03/05/97 AP -D LIGHTNING PRINTING 157.1-,7
8868 03/05/97 AP -D ANOKA - HENNEPIN TECH COLLEGE 720.00
8869 03/05/97 AP -D INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 173.33
8870 03/05/97 AP -D US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 55.40
8871 03/05/97 AP -D AT&T 12.83
8872 03/05/97 AP -D MINNEGASCO 827.04
8873 03/05/97 AP -D NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE 997.35
4 03/05/97 AP -D IAFC 120.00
8875 03/05/97 AP -D C.P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 27.20
8876 03/05/97 AP-D B & S INDUSTRIES, INC. 442.86
8877 03/05/97 AP-D NATIONAL FIRE SPRINKLER ASSOC 175.00
8878 03/05/97 AP -D IOS 74.40
8879 03/05/97 AP -D DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO 303.53
8880 03/05/97 AP -D KRISS PREMIUM PRODUCTS, INC. 142.50
8881 03/05/97 AP -D TOM THUMB 86.89
8882 03/05/97 AP -D EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. 505.57
8883 03/05/97 AP -D LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 150.00
8884 03/05/97 AP -D MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE 5.72
8885 03/05/97 AP -D FIRSTAR RANK 122.41
8886 03/05/97 AP -D PEHL, HINSCHBERGER ASSOCIATES 250.00
03/05/97 at 06:18PM CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT PAGE
BANK CHECK REGISTER
Checking account
All Periods Up To 03 /31/97
CHECK NO DATE TYPE PAID TO / DESCRIPTION CHECK AMOUNT
TOTAL MANUAL CHECKS (M): 0.
TOTAL COMPUTER CHECKS (C): 0.00
TOTAL DIRECT DISBURSEMENTS (D): 12,023.50
TOTAL CHECKS: 12,023.50
03/05/97 at 06 :19PM CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Pago 1
A/P Pre- Checkwriting Report
BANK ACCOUNT: Checking account
DATE T CHECK NO PAID TO / FOR AMOUNT
03/05/97 D 0 DISTRICT CLERK -NET PAYROLL 457.13
TOTAL AMOUNT OF ALL CHECKS: 457.13
MEM
DATE : March 6, 1997
TO Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM : Jim March
RE Appearance of Mike Black of Royal Oaks Realty concerning
the Lakeland Hills Development
Mr. Mike Black is going to be present to discuss the issues of
sidewalks in their development and the amount of money that they
will contribute towards extending watermain either across
Clearwater Creek or north on Centerville Road and then east down
Peltier Lake Drive.
Dave Nyberg and I met with Mike Black and Marcel Ebensteiner of
Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. on Thursday morning. The developer's
feel that the creek crossing would cost no more than $45,000.
Dave and I argued that the crossing could be closer to $75,000
all things being considered. The actual cost would probably fall
somewhere in between. We will discuss this further at the
Council meeting. I mentioned that even though the road would be
constructed to 7 ton standards, in the eyes of the City,
sidewalks would be a nice amenity to this development. I
suggested running a sidewalk on the west side of the street loop
from Main Street to Main Street. I will discuss this further at
the Council meeting.
RO L IIIIIIIIINI I C'+
REALTY, INC.
March 7, 1997
James March
City Administrator
1880 Main Street
Centerville, MN 55038
RE: Lakeland Hills
Dear Mr, March, Mayor Withather and City Council Members Powers -
Rasmussen, Brenner, Buckbee and Helmbrecht:
As we proceed into the final design phase of Lakeland Hills, it is important for
our Company to realize the financial cornminnents to the project. Our
Company has agreed to contribute dollars towards the City project to loop the
water main north along Centerville Road and Peltier Lake Drive to Mill Road.
These dollars are 10 lower the cost of the pudic improvement in lieu of our
cost to loop the water ?:Lain ea'terly across Clearwater Creek to Clear Ridge
Street. Your consulting engineer has estimated the cost to construct a water
pipe across the creek and to purchase the necessary utility easement to be
between $31,400 and $38,000 dollars. The estimate did not include any cost
for administration, legal or engineering design services. At this tune, Royal
Oaks Realty is willing to contribute an amount of $50,000.00 towards the
Suture water main loop. This: dollar arnount is more than what is needed at
this time for our completion of a creek crossing project.
We also request the issue of sidewalks to he resolved. It i.s our opinion that
sidewalks are not needed in Lakeland Hills. People do not want the
maintenance responsibility that conies with having a sidewalk in front of their
home, The streets in Lakeland Hills are local, residential streets that will
carry less than 500 average daily trips per day. The traffic does not warrant
sidewalks. The City ordinances do not require sidewalks. No other local
residential streets have sidewalks, including the neighborhood immediately to
the north. Royal Oaks Realty is requesting the City Council to uniformly
apply the ordinance on sidewalks to Lakeland Hills.
4190 l- eungton Avenue • $hore.ie,. 'Mhnn =,;ta 55126 • (612) 483 -5518 • Fax (61 2) 483 - 5642 •
Ur1Yi /!1]]! 1 ;14 403dC4 KV'AL UAW K.tKLIY 111 rwat U3
•
-page 2-
I will attend your Ci.ty Council sleeting on Wednesday, March 12, 1997, to
address these issues and answer any questions.
Yours truly, t
Michael J. Black
Project Manager
Land Development Division
•
Mary Capra will be appearing to suggest a test program for a welcoming service to new
citizens in Centerville. The welcoming service would be through EDC with local business
donating coupons and the same. Mary Capra will discuss piloting the test program with
50 new residents coming to Centerville. Several business have been contacted and they
have shown great interest in bring the welcoming service to Centerville.
NEMO
DATE : March 6, 1997
TO Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM : Jim March
RE Dean Johnson's Attached Letter
Attached is a status letter on the comprehensive plan budget.
Everyone received this letter previously and I believe that we
should send an official response.
My recommendation is to send a letter to Dean Johnson
acknowledging receipt of his letter dated February 17,
acknowledging that there was work performed outside of the
original scope of the project and requesting that Dean submit an
invoice that he feels would fairly represent his position in
regards to the billing situation.
.-4
5
0
RESOURCE
STRATEGIES February 17, 1997
CORPORATION
FlB. 1 8 1991
6600 CITY WEST PARKWAY
SUITE 340 Mr. Jim March
MINNEAPOLIS, MN City Administrator
55344 City of Centerville
612/942 -8010 1880 Main Street
FAX 612/942 -7464 Centerville, MN 55038
RE: Comprehensive Plan Budget Status
Dear Jim:
As we have discussed in the past, RSC has experienced some cost overruns in
the preparation of the Comprehensive Plan. This letter is intended to itemize
those costs and identify areas of work that were outside of our original scope
of services.
RSC has submitted five invoices to the City over the past year and a half,
pertaining to the Comprehensive Plan. The invoices all indicated actual labor
expended and actual labor invoiced. The total labor invoiced to date has
totaled $6056.25. The total labor actually expended was $10,091.25. Our
gross labor overrun, or amount not reimbursed, is $4035.00.
The original Request for Proposals and our June 20, 1995 Work Plan / Budget
were based on assumptions that many components in the 1989
Comprehensive Plan would not be revised. In particular, these included
issues identification and development of goals and policies. As it turned out,
the City wanted to hold a Town Meeting to discuss community issues and re-
establish goals and policies.
Our normal costs associated with the Town Meeting process and development
of goals and policies fall into a range of $2800 - $3800. Our efforts in
Centerville were average time commitments, not above average. Other labor
overages occurred primarily changes in land use designations and
development staging information in the plan.
0
City of Centerville
February 17, 1997
Page Two
We normally propose comprehensive plan contracts with a cost not to exceed.
We never request consideration for contract adjustments, unless we perform
work outside of the scope of services. In the case of Centerville, we have
clearly exceeded the work scope in the areas of issues identification and goals
and policies.
The current budget has $1995.00 of labor, which has not been invoiced. The
remaining categories include Met Council Formal Plan Review, Final Plan
Draft and Implementation. For all intents and purposes we have completed
all but the Implementation section. The current unexpended balance for
expenses is $904.42.
Attached is a new invoice, which includes labor and expenses from November
1, 1996 through January, 1997. The contract balance after this invoice leaves
$440.00 labor and $675.41 in expenses. These categories will allow us to
identify obvious changes needed in the Zoning Ordinance and produce the
final copies of the Comprehensive Plan.
At this point, I would only ask that you review the budget overruns we have
experienced. I am not suggesting that the City cover all of these costs; but , I
would like to discuss some sort of settlement that the City is comfortable
with.
Please do not hesitate to contact me, if you have any questions regarding this
matter.
Sincerely,
Dean R. Johnson
President
MEMO
DATE : March 6, 1997
TO Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM : Jim March
RE Attached letter from the City of Hugo
I spoke with Kate Drewry from the Rice Creek Watershed District
in regards to the attached letter. I indicated that we would be
discussing the letter at the next council meeting and we would be
forming on official response. I asked for the position of the
RCWD and she indicated that they have not formed an opinion. She
also indicated that the St. Paul Water Utility and MN Department
of Natural Resources probably would have more to do with the
issue than RCWD. Ms. Drewry noted that she had just today
received a petition from over 100 persons indicating that they
wanted to have an operations study conducted on Peltier Lake Dam.
She said most of the concern was being raised by persons in
Columbus Township, although there was a signature from a property
owner on Peltier Lake.
I indicated that the City Council would probably order a letter
be sent to the RCWD indicating that the Centerville City Council
would like to see there be several opportunities for public input
in regards to studying the situation. Kate had mentioned that
the petitioners were concerned with wet farm fields, lack of
wildlife, natural plant growth and erosion concerns. I recommend
that we send a letter requesting the RCWD, DNR, or St. Paul Water
Authority call for a public hearing before considering any
operational study on the Peltier Lake Dam.
City of Hugo
5524 Upper 146th Street North • Hugo, MN 55038 -9367
Phone (612) 429 -6676 • Fax (612) 426 -2859
FEB . 0 7 1 .
February 4, 1997
Cities of Townships of
Lino Lakes Columbus
..-Centerville Forest Lake
White Bear Lake White Bear Lake
Forest Lake Grant
Subject: Peltier Lake Dam
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The City of Hugo recently sent the enclosed letter to the Rice Creek Watershed District
supporting an operations study of the SL Paul Water Utility Dam on Peltier Lake in
Centerville. As you are probably aware, The SL Paul Water Utility used Peltier Lake and
adjacent water bodies as a source of fresh water for a number of years. The dam
controls the flow of water out of the lake, and thus from Hardwood, Clearwater and upper
Rice Creeks as well. Concems have been expressed that the dam has been keeping
water levels at unusually high levels, and causing flooding along the tributary creeks.
Though the flooding Issue does not directly impact the City of Hugo, the management
practices of the dam do. The ability of Rice Creek to handle the stormwater run -off from
a large part of Hugo, Forest Lake, Centerville, Grant, Columbus Township, White Bear
Lake and Lino Lakes is dictated by operation of the dam. Given the rapid development
in the watersheds, the dam could become an issue of contention in the future as the
volume of water passing through Peltier Lake increases. The City of Hugo believes that
it would be beneficial for all involved to define an updated operating plan for the dam
note.
The City of Hugo encourages the cities and townships with land draining into Peltier Lake
to support a study of the operations of the dam by the St. Paul Water Utility and the
RCWD by forwarding letters of support to the District.
FOR THE CITY COUNCIL
Si rely,
‘71(
usd6 1444.,
City Administrator
RAM:DAM2
MEMO
DATE : March 7, 1997
TO Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM : Jim March
RE Changes to the Union contract
Enclosed are the pages that have incorporated the changes to the
draft union contract that we had approved at an earlier meeting.
Greg is reviewing the final changes. I noted that the holidays
need to be changed to be consistent with the ones that we already
offer. We will discuss this further at the next council meeting.
REVIeff 2 76-9
LABOR AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CITY OF CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA
AND THE
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS
LOCAL NO. 49
AFL -CIO
January 1, 1997 through December 31, 1998
19.4 Job vacancies within the designated bargaining unit will be posted for
five (5) working days so that members of the bargaining unit can be
considered for such vacancies.
ARTICLE XX. INSURANCE
St ?H APPENDIX B
ARTICLE XXI. HOLIDAYS
The EMPLOYER will provide ten (10) paid holidays for calendar years
1997 and 1998. The holidays will be designated as follows:
New Year's Day Veteran's Day
President's Day Thanksgiving Day
Memorial Day
4 of July Christmas Day
Labor Day '
• 10- i g • :.'y t+. •e t' e - a sc.
E R'S
ARTICLE XXII. SICK LEAVE
Sick leave with pay shall be granted Tor all permanent part-time and
full-time employees in accordance with the City's current sick leave
policy.
ARTICLE XXIII. SEVERANCE PAY /RETIREMENT INSURANCE
CONTRIBUTION
23.1 After ten (10) years of Continuous employment with the City, an
employee of this unit shall, upon honorable severance, receive one -
half (112) of his /her accumulated sick leave to a maximum of four
hundred (400) hours as severance pay.
23.2 Employees, retiring from the City's employment meeting the
retirement requirements of P.ER.A. and qualifying under Section 23.1
14
•
may elect to receive, in lieu of the severance pay provided in Section
23.1, Employer -paid insurance premiums toward medical /hospital
insurance coverage. Said payment shall be provided according to,
and limited by, the following:
A. Total premium payments shall be limited to the value of one -
half (1/2) the accumulated sick leave of the employee upon
retirement to a maximum of four hundred (400) hours.
B. Premiums shall be only for those insurance plans or coverage
available to current employees of the unit.
C. In the event an employee electing this benefit chooses to
discontinue this coverage, the remaining cash value (cash value
upon retirement less premiums paid) shall be paid to the
employee, and the employee shall forfeit future rights and
coverage of this benefit as weli as the right to re -enter the City's
insurance plan.
D. Al! payments made by the City shall end when the remaining
cash value for that former employee equals zero or upon the
former employee's 65' birthday, it shall be paid to the former
employee.
E. In the event of the death of an employee, an employee's
dependents have the option of remaining covered under the
insurance plan until the employee would have reached theft 65'
birthday or to cash out the value remaining in the employee's
severance account.
ARTICLE XXIV. VACATION LEAVE
24.1 General
Regular employees and permanent part -time employees who
have worked for the City for at least six (6) months are eligible for
paid vacation. Paid vacation is not available to temporary,
intermittent or seasonal employees.
24.2 Accrual
Vacation leave with pay will accrue at the following rates:
it' jx,'
t k
.J_ r Years of Service Vacation Leave
k ' ,
After the first six (6) months ........... One week
147• � •
y,k` "� 16
k�`
After one (1) year Two weeks
After the fourth year (4 -9) Three weeks
After nine years (9 -15) Four weeks
After fifteen (15) years (15-20).... . Five weeks
After twenty (20) years until retirement.. .Six Weeks
For clarification purposes after six (6) months a restular or
Permanent part -time employee 01 have one ji) week vacation
accrued.
24.3 Vacation Leave Requirements
a) Vacation leave will not accrue during the training period.
However, if the employee becornes a regular or permanent
part-time employee vacation leave will be awarded based on
the schedule above.
ARTICLE XXV. STANDBY PAY
Individuals assigned to standby duty shall receive One Hundred Twenty -
One Dollars ($121.00) per week for each complete week they are
assigned and have served in a standby capacity. Additionally, the call
back provision detailed in ARTICLE XIf of this Contract shall apply to each
call out incident the Employee responds to while on standby duty
ARTICLE XXVI. SAFETY SHOES AND WORK CLOTHES
26.1 The EMPLOYER agrees to reimburse Employees a sum not to
exceed Ninety Dollars ($90.00) per year for the purchase of safety
shoes when the Employee receives authorization from the City to
replace his/her safety shoes or boots and presents a receipt for the
purchase of certified safety shoes!baots in an amount equaling or
exceeding the requested reimbursement. Safety shoes or boots must
be worn by employees at all times while on the job.
26.2 The EMPLOYER will provide up to One Hundred Fifty Dollars
($150.00) per year per employee for the Water and Sewer
Departments and the Mechanic for the purchase of uniform clothing as
requested by the employee and approved by the supervisor.
ARTICLE XXVII, COMPENSATORY TIME
Employees who are assigned to work by the EMPLOYER in excess of
the normal work day shall. at the Employee's option, be compensated
at the rate of one and one (1 -1/2) times the Employee's basic hourly
16
;.36 ttO C i c.c =6 .'iT+ - . =.t 1 ;::n1 OT `I LE 91 -f_1
rate for all hours worked in excess of the normal work day, or shall
receive equivalent compensatory time off at the rate of one and one-haft
(1-1/2) hours for each hour worked, to be banked by the Employee to a
maximum of eighty (80) hours. Employees must request compensatory
time off in the same manner as they request vacation, however, under no
circumstances shall requests be made for increments less than two (2)
hours. Compensatory time may be used for compensation of
unrequested leave. If an Employee is terminated, he or she will be
compensated for accurnulated cornpensatory time.
ARTICLE XXVIII. WAIVER
28.1 Any and al! prior agreements, resolution. practices, policies, rules
and regulations regarding terms and conditions of employment, to the
extent inconsistent with the provisions of this AGREEMENT, are
hereby superseded.
28.2 The parties mutually acknowledge that during their negotiations
which resulted in this AGREEMENT, each had the unlimited right and
opportunity to make demands and proposals with respect to any terms
or conditions of employment not removed by law from bargaining. All
agreements and understandings arrived at by the parties are set forth
in writing in this AGREEMENT for the stipulated duration of this
AGREEMENT. The EMPLOYER and the UNION each voluntarily and
unqualifiedly waives the right to meet and negotiate regarding any and
all terms and conditions of employment referred to or covered in this
AGREEMENT or with respect to any term or condition of employment
not specifically referred to or covered by this AGREEMENT, even
though such terms or conditions may not have been within the
knowledge or contemplation of either or both parties at the time this
contract was negotiated or executed.
17
-p4 Th',._ 1 - �.F!- _TL= -! -
ARTICLE XXIX. DURATION
This AGREEMENT shall be effective as of January 1, 1997, and shall
remain in full force and effect until the 31" day of December, 1998.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
AGREEMENT on this Day of 19
FOR THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE FOR THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF
OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL
NO. 49, AFL -CIO
Mayor Business Manager
City Manager Business Representative
President
Recording Secretary
Steward
18
APPENDIX A
WAGES •
(1/1/97 - 12/31/97)
Effective the first payroll period in 1997 through the last payroll period in 1997
Full -time and P ermanent part -time Public Works employees covered by this
Agreement shall be paid at the rate of $12.50 per hour.
(1/1/98-12/31/98)
Beginning with the first payroll period in 1998 through the last payroll period in
1998 Full -time and permanent _part -time Public Works employees covered by
this Agreement shall be paid at the rate of $12.95 per hour
•
19
NJ 0 =DKr .. 6r nel:Cn ACM
•
APPENDIX 6
INSURANCE
The EMPLOYER will pay 50% of the individual health insurance premium
for permanent part - time employees up to a maximum of $I00 per month.
The EMPLOYER will pay a flat fee of $150 per month for permanent full -time
employees electing single health insurance coverage. Any amount over the
$150 premium will be paid by EMPLOYEE. Any excess .mount not used for
health insurance under the $150 flat fee can be used to purchase additional
life insurance or taken as deferred compensation,
The EMPLOYER will pay a flat fee of $300 per month for permanent full -time
employees electing family health insurance coverage. Any amount over the
$300 premium will be paid by EMPLOYEE. Any excess amount not used for
health insurance under the $300 flat fee can be used to purchase additional
life insurance or taken as deferred compensation.
The EMPLOYER shall provide for each employee the S8^8 Dental Insurance
coverage as current non - bargaining unit employees receive in accordance
with the City's current policy.
•
20
•
•
S00 Tr0'Ohi z2 26 r •_t - er '1'70_ 3 _T:ri L5 ' O
MEMO
DATE : March 4, 1997
TO Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM : Jim March
RE Summary of street crack filling bids
Paul Palzer has acquired three proposals for street crack
filling. As you can see by the attached information two of the
three quotes were quite competitive. I concur with Paul's
recommendation to enter into a three year contract with Bergman
Companies. We have used Bergman in the past and have been
satisfied with their performance. If we use the same company to
do street crack filling on a consistent basis, it also makes it
easier for us to have them refill the street cracks that have
popped loose and are still under warranty.
Sample Motion... I make a motion to accept the proposal from
Bergman Companies, Inc. for street crackfilling for a three year
period at the rates as specified in their proposal.
March 3, 1997
To: Jim March, City Administrator
From: Paul Palzer, Public Works Director
Re: Street Crack Seal Contract
Dear Jim:
I have received three proposals to perform crack filling in Centerville over the next three
years. The City has been on a three basis for crack filling since 1994 with Bergman
Companies which has worked well. The advantage to the City is a fixed price over the
three year period and also a three year warranty on the workmanship and materials.
The crack fill proposals are based upon a minimum of 12,000 lineal feet per time /year,
routing, heat drying, filling the crack with hot poured rubberized sealant meeting ASTM
specification D3405 and applying a cover material to prevent tracking.
Based upon the following proposals submitted by the three firms, I recommend that the
City enter into another three year contract with Bergman Companies. Their workmanship
has been high quality and we have had a good working relationship with them. The
following is the breakdown of the proposals.
Allied Blacktop Company 1997 - -- $.36 per lineal foot
1998 - -- 137 per lineal foot
1999 - -- 138 per lineal foot
Bergman Companies, Inc. 1997 -99 - -- 137 per lineal foot
Gopher State Seaicoat, inc. 1997-99 - -- $.56 per lineal feet
Please let me know how to proceed so we can get the crack filling work scheduled in the
spring time before the City performs the seal coat work this year.
Sincere]
� ~ ' i.
Paul Pil
PWD /BO
GOPHER STATE SEALCOAT, INC.
7700 Highway 7
St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55426
(6(2) 931-918 9 .F,E8. 2 1 16
PROPOSAL SALE Fax (612) 931 -0956
DATE OF PROPOSAL PROPOSED COMPLETION DATE
Paul J. Palzer 2/17/97 1997,98,99
T
JOB NAME PHONE
1880 Main St. City of Centerville H - i
O -
Centerville, MN 55038 JOB LOCATION
0-
We are pleased to offer you materials and services as shown below, subject to the indicated terms. If this offer is not accepted
within ten days (or by ) it then may be accepted only at our option. YOUR ACCEPTANCE WILL BE
ACCOMPLISHED BY COMPLETEING AND RETURNING TO US THE ORIGINAL OF THIS FORM.
DESCRIPTION OR SPECIFICATION AMOUNT
Install hot pour rubberized crackfiller as spec'd in letter dated 2/12/9 from
Paul Palzer
Price quote for all 3 years .56 per L.F.
TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
C 1. THE TOTAL CONTRACT SHALL BE PAID ON COMPLETION, THANK YOU
0
N 2. Any balance unpaid after 30 days Is subject to a finance charge of 18% per annum (1 1/2 per month).
t 3. This contract shall be completed with reasonable proptness by the Contractor, but the Contractor shall not be responsible for delays or failure N completion,
T caused by weather unfavorable to carrying out work Involved, tire, explosion, failure of equipment, strikes, differences with workmen. compliance with orders
' of a governmental agency, interruption In delivery o1 materials, or from any cause beyond his reasonable control.
0 4. The contract price does not Include an taxes except as stated, and any tax Imposed by governmental authority which affeds the contrail price shall be in
N addition thereto.
S 5. The Contractor shall Indemnify the Owner from all claims because of any damages sustained by any person or property on account of the operations of the
Contractor In carrying out this contract.
6. This contract contains the entire agreement between the parties. There are no oral promises, agreeements, or waranlies affecting It. Any alteration or
F deviation from the above quantities and specification or other change in the contract must be made in writing. and executed by authorized representatives of
of the parties.
s
p
L
E 1
ACCEPTED (Owner) GOPHER STATE SEALCOAT (Contractor)
Rand Blackowiak
BY (signature of authorized representative) DATE ACCEPTED BY (' at " of au�th / z �d representative)
,, (Title) j17 _
,C (Title) 1
1
(ORIGINAL' — WHITE OWNERS COPY — CANARY ' FILE COPY — PINK
Bergman Companies, Inc.
6615 U.S. Hwy. 12 West, P.O. Box 659, Eau Claire, WI 54702 -0659 • Phone (715) 874 -6070. 1 -800- 497 -4907 • FAX (715) 874 -6717
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO PHONE DATE
City of Centerville /Paul Palzer 429- 4750/429 -3232 January 29, 1997
STREET JOB NAME
1694 Borel St 1997 -1999 Crack sealing
CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION
Centerville, MN 55038 Various City Streets
We rereby submit specifications and estimates for:
Crack Sealing
I. Rout out all structural cracks to a width of 3/4" & depth of 3/4 ".
2. Use air compressors and 2200 heat lances ro clean and dry out all cracks.
3. Seal cracks with hot -pour rubberized sealant meeting ASIM specifications 03405.
4 . Apply cover material to sealant to prevent tracking.
Rout and seal approximately 12,000 L.F. to above specifications
@ 5.37 per foot. Work to be measured on completion.
Customer charged for each foot completed @ S.37.
Guaranteed against failure due to workmanship or materials for 3 years.
This agreement is contractual for 3 years of crack sealing at $.37 per foot
installed to above spec's based on sealing approximately 12,000 L.F. per year, per trip.
Additional mobilizations beyond initial annual trip chargeable @ 5200.00 each.
This proposal assures there is no predetermined prevailing +.age scale Cn; this project_.
1. We propose hereby to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with above specifications,
for the sum of:
(See above) *
Doll ars ($
"
Full Payment due within 30 days after completion.
2. In the event owner defaults and fails to make payment as aforesaid, interest on any unpaid balance
shall be charged at the highest legal rate commencing with the date of default.
3. All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner
according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs
will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. Contractor to carry fire, tornado and other necessary
insurance, including Workmen's Compensation Insurance.
• Bergman Companies, Inc. by
Jack e Authorized Signature
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL - The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are
hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
Date of Acceptance: Signature
PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN YELLOW COPY - KEEP WHITE COPY.
•
ALLIED BLACKTOP COMPANY
LBITUMINOUS CONTRACTORS
February 27, 1997
City of Centerville
Paul J. Palzer
Public Works Director
RE: 1997 - 1999 Municipal Crackfilling.
Dear Paul:
Thank you for the opportunity to quote your project. Allied Blacktop Company's rates for filling a
minimum of 12,000 feet of cracks per year as per your specifications are as follows.
1997 - $ .36 per lineal foot.
1998 - $ .37 per lineal foot
1999 - $ .38 per lineal foot
Thanks again for considering Allied Blacktop in past and future projects. If you are in need of any
other information, please feel free to call me at 425 -0575.
Sincerely,
Peter Capistrant
Vice President
10503 89TH AVENUE NORTH, MAPLE GROVE, MINNESOTA 55369
PHONE (612- 425 -0575) FAX (612- 425 -1046)
i -
MEMO
DATE : March 6, 1997
TO Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM : Jim March
RE Attached letter from Steve Brown
I spoke with Mr. Brown in regards to the attached letter. He
just wanted to bring this to the attention of the City. He does
not wish to appear at a council meeting at this time. My thought
was the problem may diminish as homes are constructed around the
pond this year. Mr. Brown agreed. If the problem continues next
year, I indicated that we could post the pond for no snowmobiling
and have the police department enforce the restriction. This
letter is for your information files.
STEVE AND /7,2 BROWN
1869 Quebec Street
Centerville, MN 5538
653 -8162
February 27, 1996
City of Centerville
Attn: Town Board
Centerville, MN 55038 AJAR. ry t.''
RE: Snowmobiles
Dear Town Board Members
Lisa and I have been residents of Centerville for Nearly seven years.
During our tenure in Centerville we lived at 1737 Main Street for five and
one half years and currently live at the address listed above.
Our time spent in Centerville the first five and a half years proved
enjoyable enough to move only three quarters of a mile away to our new
home. Main Street attracts a lot of action including speeding cars, loud
stereos and snowmobiles. Although many snowmobiles went by our Main Street
home, most drivers were going slow and were going from one point to another
thus creating a tolerable situation.
Since moving to Quebec Street February 1996, we have been bombarded with
careless and thoughtless snowmobilers in the back of our house. If you are
not familiar, our house butts up to a privately owned pond which has a
minuet amount of shore line owned by the city (see attached map).
Snowmobilers get great joy in racing back a forth at excessive speeds is
order to gain speed to jump the banks of the pond.
The point of this letter is to make you aware there is a problem with
snowmobiles on this pond, other residents are equally bothered and I wodid
like you to contact me in order to schedule me into a town board meeting.
Not only have I identified the problem, I think there may be a simple
solution.
Please call me Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. - 9:30 a.m. at the
phone number listed above.
Sincerely,
Steve and Lisa Brown
tAryOff?/ Ci
r A Northern Metro Getaway
//g N
�fAJ�I . \w c:-_—..--.1,19, r9N a
_ : '' 1F ...
1,f \r -- r , �12 1 r OLd _ r 1'Y l 1 '' -- lr '9�^! ,r r' ,. 1
1 1 , I I 2 i I I I I
' 31 "w 3 R 4 1R 5 s 6 I8 7 RI 8 1 9 8 I. 1. 1 1
q 1 a C C C 11= I.' F
; , f ' 1 3 8 - 1 i---1 "> 113 9 y/ PARK {
\ jl I ' II I ; II 1 p
s 2 1 1 1 1I 11 11 !
\ 31 ' j L._ — L 1, ,,,,,_J L_ L_ si _J __„ L_
\4 74th — _ Street — 1
- /. \ `\ 3 3 . - - - _- f 1 - 39 1 3 I 34 II 4-40 1
1 z
i /`` ':_:., 1
4 5 _ J 6 111 7 U $ y 9 , PARK
■ 3 • .- r '.- I
3
2 / \ A °4
/, 'fr. A\ .,w ' 4.
.� ,,v 1 N 'IQ, \l2�\ Or,, • a � Z - _. -
'I South 'lln• of ACd+N \ K POND LcRIC SECOND AoanoN F ,� - ..' " '"y
J
1 1 1 1 s 11, O 11 7 IL g I I C W , 1 ` 4 ,
N. line of ACORN CREEK adze: ' I$ 10 i I. 9 Ile V 1 I 1 q I h / , 1 is
1 a
• 1
- i Ii II 1 I I ,I ,, , , a 1\
3 �
4 Quebec _ _ Street _ _ „� .,
s, -
J v i....1 e i �_ > ,_ nm_ ��y < ' 3
r-- era - --1 td r s:'A-- ^, r - 1r 1r 1r 1r . .\ �'
1 1 O 1 11 : 1 11 .5 _ ' t 3 g o 1 11 I 1 11 I I 1 1 1 11 .{ 1 � 4L___ - - - , J 1IR iIg 112 I Ct 18 3G 1 18 1 v 1
1 1 1 2 ■ . ' 11 4 ^ 111 5 1 ' 6 1 i 7 I 1 8 e
F co L 1
L ' , ,on 1 1 11 11 !1 11 1 11 11 I A 2
^ ^ '4 y 2 L___:L____L____L___ L ____ - L ____ J L ___ � 1
rya, - 1 r 1 r - 1 r 1 1 1 -Mai- r 1 r - 11 - - 1
1 I I I 11 11 I I 11 I I 1 61 r , •u - 1
T 16W15 12 1 4 3 112 isn 1 ' 4 10 1 x9 i yl d 1 I:
1 1 1, MI I: I: I2 r.1 1 1 1 Iti 8 F _ w 1 "
I �' I I I� 1 11 I' I ! 1 i i „ 1 1 _ J yu J
II I r Q I II 11 111 1 I 1F I I 'I 1 1 .'_ - �--
' 1 _- •, i L _J L� „_JL -J L. L .,1�__J
_ _ I _ _ -- _ 73rd — S
r J..e e - lr J °6t 1r "'m'� lrsuu�S” 71 1 11 r '' - 1 r "1r - ' - - - - it 1
-- //
1 1 11 1 1 1 „ '
1 1 11 11 1 1 F 1 11 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 i d 1 1 1 1 I 1
1
1 I I 1 1 1 1X 1 x r V .• 1: 3 1 ',
4 4 Ig 5 1; 6 -
. 1 - 2 x 3 , 4 , 5 1 1 1 _ 2 1 e 1- 1- I
- 1 1 I1 11 1 1 1 1 I1 V 111 1 1
n
I , 1 1 II 1 I 1 11 N II 2 1 II
L " - _ .,,,.), L_JL_ C I L, 1 1- it- _ JL_ - L �, a JL__ „,
, Inc. • 1150 East Seventh Street • St. Paul, MN 55106 • Office
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
TUESDAY, JANUARY 7, 1997
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City
of Centerville held their regular meeting and a public hearing on Tuesday, January 7, 1997,
at City Hall. Chairperson Tourville called the regular meeting to order at 7:05 PM.
PRESENT: Chairperson Dan Tourville Kathy Welk
Allan LaMotte Tina Vermeulen
Linda Broussard- Vickers
STAFF /CONSULTANTS: James March
Ry -Chel Gaustad
PUBLIC HEARING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:05 PM
Tourville introduced Mr. Mike Black from Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. whom was proposing
to have Lakeland Hills preliminary plan and rezoning approved.
Mr. Black explained the Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. is proposing a 33.9 acres development
"Lakeland Hills". The minimum square feet per lot of 15,000 has been met. The average
lot size is over 33,000 square feet. Mr. Black introduced Mr. Tim Kytonen the Registered
Land Surveyor of Glenn Rehbein Companies. Mr. Kytonen will be working with Royal
Oaks since they have done a majority of the plans and excavating for the previous land
owner Rocky Goertz.
Mr. Black explained RCWD is currently reviewing the wetlands and mitigation, however
some of the wetland impacts cannot be avoided. Mr. Black is proposing to run sanitary
sewer and water off Centerville Road. Black explained the City Engineer will have to
address the pressure and long extension of the watennain from the north.
Mr. Black explained this will be a closed development but they will open lots to a couple
builders. Although other builders will be involved, Royal Oaks will approve all building
plans prior to building. The home values will be between $175,000 and $200,000 and
higher by the creek or with a lake view. The Leroux property consists of 17 acres and the
Hensel property is approximately 17 acres.
Tourville asked what will happen with the Hensel house? Mr. Black will move and
remodel the exterior but currently Royal Oaks plans to leave it in the development.
Planning and Zoning Meeting January 7, 1997
Tourville asked if Royal Oaks was requesting R -2 Single Family rezoning? Mr. Black said
yes. Tourville asked if there is a building pad on each lot including the smallest lot, Mr.
Black said yes there is a building pad on each lot and 15,000 square feet is the smallest lot.
Tourville confirmed the three accesses; two off County Road 14 and one off Centerville
Road.
LaMotte asked what would happen with the shrubs and trees. Mr. Black said the majority
of the shrubs and trees will remain. Royal Oaks felt preserving the atmosphere would lend
to the development. LaMotte questioned the Centerville Elementary Schools drainage.
Mr. Black mentioned a portion of the drainage will be flowing on Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10. Mr.
Black has been in contact with Bill Martin and Gary Korpella at the school and RCWD.
Royal Oaks is happy to work with the school on the drainage issues. Although the
majority of the ponding is on the school property, Mr. Black was not sure if RCWD will
allow ponding in wetlands. LaMotte suggested placing a fence along the pond area to
keep kids out. Mr. Kytonen mentioned the ponds are very shallow.
Mr. Black mentioned the lowest floor elevations will be two feet above the flood plain.
Tourville questioned the trailway to the school. Mr. Black said the trailway will be a 15
feet wide and 140 feet along the trail right of way to the school. If the city would prefer
something else Royal Oaks is happy to discuss it. Although Mr. Behrind, Mr. Martin and
Mr. Korpella from the school have seen the plans and were comfortable with the trail
leading to the ballfields.
Tourville asked if the school was against a through road. Mr. Black understood the
school was not in favor of a through road. Whereas, the Fire and Police departments were
in favor of the road going through.
Mayor Wilharber commented the city could have the developers put in sidewalks.
March commented sidewalks could be included in the developers agreement. Tourville
asked what is to keep motorized vehicles or bikes from driving on the sidewalk. Mr. Bill
Lalonde of 1687 Westview Street, felt it depends how the city address the sidewalks. Tim
Schweppe of 7249 Centerville Road, questioned the distance between the development
and the north side abutting properties. Mr. Black said it will be a minimal of 30 feet but it
could be 50 - 60 feet back. Mr. Schweppe asked about drainage. Mr. Kytonen said they
could install a berm and redirect the flow of water.
Mr. Schweppe asked what will happen with the row of pines and the other trees which run
along the wetlands? Mr. Black said the trees will stay, unless the lot purchaser wishes to
move their house in that area.
Mr. Schweppe asked the proposed width of the road from Centerville Road since it was
constructed at 34 feet? Mr. Kytonen said the width of the road right of way will be 60
feet with a 34 foot road.
•
2
Planning and Zoning Meeting January 7, 1997
March mentioned the City Engineer has not submitted comments on this development.
Tourville suggested Planning and Zoning have an opportunity to review the engineers
comments prior to approval.
Hatem Qamhieh, 7251 Clearwater Drive, questioned the water run off to the creek and
requested directing the drainage to flow to the west away from the creek. Mr. Black
explained the storm water system directs the water flow away from the creek but some
water will flow into the creek. Mr. Qamhieh said there must be protection since the creek
is eroding and wondered what there is for protection? Tourville asked if there is a
sedimentation pond needed? Mr. Black commented during construction the creek will be
protected from sediment and erosion. Mr. Qamhieh mentioned several years ago the
creek was about 7 feet wide now it is 15 feet wide, he felt it was due to run off from
developments. Mr. Qamhieh suggested directing water to Centerville Lake instead of the
creek.
Bill Lalonde felt too much building is going on at least until the school, sewer system and
water towers catch up. Mr. Lalonde requested Planning and Zoning not put this before
the council on January 8th. Mr, Lalonde said for the record "he is not in favor of this
development although this is a nice development ". Mr. Lalonde was not in favor of any
encroachment on the pines and rough trees on the property and suggested even the
roughest trees be taped off for protection. Mr. Lalonde recalled an artesian well on the
west side of the property. Lots 8, 9, and 10 of Block 3 will not be able to be filled.
Mr. Lalonde is against allowing the city to accept park dedication fees in place of park
dedicated land. If the City is not able to maintain the park they should slow down on
development. Mr. Lalonde feels the drainage should be addressed. Further, a minimal
digging time should be allowed and if exceeded, apply a penalty of $500.00 per day. Mr.
Lalonde felt re- sodding instead of re- seeding is necessary and is for a moratorium on
building.
Bob Knobbie of 7241 Main Street questioned the drainage on Main Street since it appears
the drainage is collecting on his property north of the proposed development. Mr.
Knobbie suggested cleaning the culverts out so the water runs free and doesn't back up.
Mr. Schweppe suggested placing the Hensel home in another area to avoid an eye sore.
Mr. Black mentioned it is a very nice home and Royal Oaks would do what they can to
match the Hensel house with the new homes.
Tourville asked if the Police and Fire Department wanted Centerville Road to go through?
Wilharber mentioned the police had no problem with the development, the Fire
Department would like Centerville Road to go through. March mentioned Milo Bennett
would rather have Centerville Road go through but the proposed plan is okay,
3
Planning and Zoning Meeting January 7, 1997
Tourville mentioned if the City decides to go with a park the City will shy away from
accepting wetlands. Mayor Wilharber mentioned maybe the city and the school can work
together with the park area.
Mr. Qamhieh asked where will the school expand? Mayor Wilharber mentioned the
school has proposed an expansion within the center of the school, they are not expanding
outside of the existing building walls.
Broussard- Vickers asked if the Planning and Zoning postponed approval until another
meeting, what impact would it have on the development? Mr. Black would understand if
the Planning and Zoning would like to table the preliminary plat, he then questioned the
rezoning.
Tourville explained its been the city's practice to approve the zoning upon final plat
approval. Tourville asked if anyone had any further questions.
MOTION by Vermeulen, seconded by Welk to continue the Public Hearing until
February 3, 1997 to hear the comments from the City Engineer. Motion carried
unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS:
Automotive Driveline Service - Craig and Jim Kozar explained the operation of
Automotive Driveline Service. Mr. Kozar explained the proposed building is 50 by 100
feet. Mr. Jim Kozar asked where the watermain was located by their property. March
commented an eight inch watermain is on the west side of 21st.
Tourville questioned the parking area? Mr. Craig Kozar indicated they have 11 parking
spots. Tourville asked if there was a need for semi - trailers to get in and turn around. Mr.
Craig Kozar said no.
Tourville questioned the future expandability? Mr. Craig Kozar had reserved about 80
feet to the west for future expansion.
Tourville suggested speaking to Rehbein to correct the swale if needed. Tourville was
concerned with the landscaping on the north side of the building, Mr. Craig Kozar was
thinking of small bushes and trees on the north side of the building.
Tourville said for the record "screening is not necessary between this building and Noble
Welding ".
MOTION by Broussard- Vickers, seconded by Vermeulen to recommend site plan to City
Council with the exception of screening on the south side, contingent of the engineers
report bullet items 2, 3, 4 & 5. Motion carried unanimously.
4
Planning and Zoning Meeting January 7, 1997
,Special Use Permit - Mr. Hank Moss requested a special use permit for advertising
benches on the corners of Main Street and 20th and Main Street and Peterson Trail. Welk
asked what purpose does this serve since there is no bus stop in either area. Vermeulen
suggested placing a bench like this in the park area. Tourville said "For snow
maintenance, traffic, the land is not level and there is no purpose, I am not in favor of
granting a Special Use Permit ".
MOTION by Welk, seconded by LaMotte to deny the special use permit at the locations
requested. Motion carried unanimously.
1997 Chairperson Position - Welk recommended Dan Tourville as Chairperson.
Vermeulen recommended Kathy Welk as Vice - Chairperson. Both accepted.
MOTION by Welk, seconded by Vermeulen to adjourn the Planning and Zoning Meeting.
Meeting was adjourned at 9:47 PM.
Respectfully Submitted,
Ry -Chel Gaustad
City Clerk
5
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 1997
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City
of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting and the continuation of a public
hearing for "Lakeland Hills" on Tuesday, February 4, 1997, at City Hall. Chairperson
Tourville called the regular meeting to order at 7:05 PM.
PRESENT: Chairperson Dan Tourville
Allan LaMotte
Linda Broussard- Vickers
ABSENT: Kathy Welk
Katrina Vermeulen
STAFF /CONSULTANTS: James March David Nyberg
Ry -Chel Gaustad
Tourville reconvened the Lakeland Hills public hearing from January 7, 1997. Tourville
opened the discussion to Mr. Mike Black of Royal Oaks Realty, Inc.
Mr. Black explained he was present to requested approval of the preliminary plat design
and rezoning. Mr. Black explained Royal Oaks have complied with the R2 zoning
requirements. Since the last meeting Royal Oaks met with MSA Consulting Engineers
and their staff and revisions have been made since the last meeting.
Mr. Black briefed the Planning and Zoning Commission of the revisions. The 50 feet rear
lot line has been addressed. The corner lots have a ten percent area addition. Mr. Black
suggested Planning and Zoning consider looking at corner lot requirements in the
ordinance as Mr. Black felt they were vague. Mr. Black updated the grading plan with
1 additions to include additional grading between homes and the wetlands will be addressed.
Mr. Black commented the utility plans have not been changed. An issue that will need to
be addressed is the need to extend the watermain and the future location of the extension
of the watermain.
Mr. Black has presented the sketch plans to the Army Corp of Engineers, RCWD, MSA,
City Staff, Planning and Zoning, Anoka County Highway Department, Tom Hoovey of the
Planning and Zoning February 4, 1997
MnDNR. Royal Oaks is doing what they can to preserve as much wetlands and natural
surroundings in the development.
Mr. Black explained after the RCWD meeting Royal Oaks lost a building lot, dropping the
count from 41 to 40 buildable lots. Continuing, Royal Oaks may be loosing more since
they need to obtain permits from the Army Corp of Engineers, PCA, DNR - wildlife and a
nation wide permit.
Mr. Black described the lot lay out and explained the over all street concept will not
change. Mr. Black is asking for the Planning and Zoning support to make a
recommendation to the City Council to approve the rezoning and preliminary plat. Mr.
Black suggested first, accepting the general street design not to exceed 40 buildable lots.
Second, approval is subject to the approval from the required review boards:
MnDNR, RCWD, and the US Army Corp of Engineers. Third, settle the watermain
easement location. Forth, developer work with the City Council to develop an avenue to
work out a watermain loop from Lalonde's property, either across the creek or down
Peltier Lake Drive. Fifth, entrance island with minimal maintenance shrubs, bushes and
contingent upon MSA - Dave Nyberg's approval. Mr. Black requested consideration for a
1000 feet block variance.
Nyberg recommended constructing the road with no curbs or gutters but put in guard
rails. Tourville asked what is the tonnage on these roads? Nyberg responded 7 ton
although, he felt it was best to go without curbs and gutters for maintenance purposes.
LaMotte questioned the road guarantee since the same issues were addressed and handled
with Peltier Lake Drive but it didn't work? Broussard- Vickers asked if it was required to
keep the road outlet to Main Street? Nyberg said yes its required for emergency vehicles
and access.
Tourville asked if the erosion issue was addressed from the last meeting? Nyberg
commented there is a sift fence that would protect erosion unless the watermain goes
under the creek, then some disruption may occur.
Nyberg identified the three options for the watermain loop:
1) North, under the creek
2) South, under the creek
3) Running the watermain down Peltier Lake Drive
Nyberg commented the utilities will be addressed on the utility plan sheet. Further, the
watermain easement will need to be shown on the final plat.
Nyberg felt confident with the developers attention to detail and suggested forwarding the
preliminary plat to the City Council with the mentioned contingencies.
2
Planning and Zoning February 4, 1997
Hatem Qamhieh 7251 Clearwater Drive, questioned the drainage flow. Mr. Qamhieh
second concern was the run off on the east side of the home by the creek. Mr. Qamhieh
asked if the drainage could be directed to the west, keeping the drainage away from the
creek. Nyberg explained the back yards will have sod which will absorb more run off then
the current landscaping. In addition only four homes will contribute to the run off.
Nyberg continued RCWD requires certain peak discharged rates to meet certain criteria's
which will apply on the run off issue.
Tourville asked Mr. Qamhieh if his questions were answered satisfactory? Mr. Qamhieh
said no, he would like the four homes to have all the gutters direct all drainage away from
the creek.
Bill Lalonde of 1687 Westview Street questioned the restrictive convenient time frame of
five years and asked if five years was long enough? Mr. Black felt there was no need to
have the restrictive covenant have longer terms since no one local would enforce it.
Mr. Lalonde addressed his concerns, suggesting three not two car garages, no dog kennels
so there wouldn't be dogs yelping. Mr. Lalonde felt no disturbance of the wetlands.
Further, the park dedication land should be on lots 1, 2, and 3. The streets should be
wider than narrow and have sidewalks. Mr. Lalonde felt lots 1 - 8 leading to the school
should have sidewalk access. He felt there should be curbs and gutters all the way. Mr.
Lalonde feels there is a real water problem. In addition he feels the watermain should be
brought to Peltier Lake Drive because if it crosses the creek it won't do any good for
anyone. Mr. Lalonde requested Mr. Nyberg to view the south west lot in the spring since
there is a bigger water issue than there currently appears. Mr. Lalonde stated for the
record "he is not in favor of further development in the city, and the city should put a
moratorium on all building ".
Mr. Qamhieh agreed there should be sidewalks for children to get to school. Tourville
questioned the sidewalk issue and asked how this would be addressed? Nyberg explained
it would be an issue the City Council would address in the developers agreement.
Tourville asked what happen to the sidewalk issue from the last meeting? Nyberg
explained the city requires sidewalks on 9 ton collector streets, Lakeland Hills will have 7
ton street.
•
Tourville asked how much traffic should the city expect from the development to the
school? Mr. Black explained the school will have a back door provided for children
walking to school and when the school expands a path will be provided. The school has
seen the plan and are comfortable as it is. Tourville asked if the trail should be an
easement? Nyberg explained the city should identify the walk way as an outlot or trailway
easement. Mr. Black explained he wouldn't want an easement because of the value of the
homes and the salability.
Broussard - Vickers suggested since the one lot is being vacated, provide an access to the
school there instead of through the northern lot. Nyberg suggested approval contingent
3
Planning and Zoning February 4, 1997
upon Mr. Black's comments regarding the state agencies, engineers approval and
recommend the preliminary plat and rezoning to the council.
Tourville commented the restrictive covenant is slightly more restrictive than the zoning
ordinance. Nyberg commented the restrictive covenant is more for the plan review.
MOTION by Tourville, seconded by Broussard- Vickers to close the "Lakeland Hills"
public hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
Public hearing closed at 9:00 PM
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
January 7, 1997 meeting minutes - tabled
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
Zoning for the Leroux/Hensel properties:
Tourville felt the 1000 feet length of the block variance is no problem with Planning and
Zoning. Short straight streets are okay, as it is an Engineer issue. Tourville liked to
entertain the idea of minimal maintenance center islands, the City would welcome them if
something could be worked out.
MOTION by Broussard- Vickers, seconded by LaMotte to recommend rezoning of the
Leroux/Hensel property from R3 to R2 contingent upon final plat approval. Further,
Planning and Zoning recommend the preliminary plat to the City Council contingent upon
the approval of all review boards, the City Engineers approval. Motion carried
unanimously.
March mentioned a developer would like Planning and Zoning review the tentative plat for
Eagle Pass 3rd addition. March informed the Commission the proposed area is staged for
development in year 2000. Tourville commented Planning and Zoning does not want to
entertain listening to this addition since the first comprehensive plan had just been
submitted to the Met Council and the area is staged for year 2000.
MOTION by Tourville, seconded by LaMotte to adjourn the Planning and Zoning
Meeting.
Meeting was adjourned at 9:55 PM.
Respectfully Submitted,
Ry -Chel Gaustad,
4
ACCAP ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC.
1201 89th Avenue NE • Suite 345 • Blaine, MN 55434 • Phone 783-4747 • FAX 783 -4700 • TTY 783-4724
A united way
A
TO: CITY OF CENTERVILLE
FROM: CATHEY WEIDMANN L / /%�
Coordinator of Senior Programs and Volunteer Services
RE: SENIOR OUTREACH REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 26, 1997
Enclosed please find your community's SENIOR OUTREACH REPORT for
the months of September, 1996 - January, 1997.
If you have any questions or comments regarding these reports,
as well as any referrals for the Senior Outreach Worker, please
feel free to contact me at 783 -4741.
Thank you for your continued support of the Senior Outreach
Program!
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
ACCAP ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM, INC.
1201 89th Avenue NE • Suite 345 • Blaine, MN 55434 • Phone 783 -4747 • FAX 783 -4700 • TTY 783
A United Way
Agency
REPOR SENIOR OUTREACH PROGRAM AREA: CENTERVILLE
MONTH: September 1996 - January 1997
FROM: Cathey Weidmann, Coordinator - Senior Programs & Volunteer Services
ON- GOING /FOLLOW -UP VISITS: 4 REFERRALS MADE /AGENCY CONTACT ON
CLIENTS'S BEHALF - # contacts
NEW CLIENTS (not duplicated)
HOUSEHOLDS: 2
Income Level Anoka County Emergency 1
150% Poverty - Below: 0
Above: 1 Anoka County Vulnerable Adult Unit 1
HUD Section 8 - Below: 0
Above: 1 Handyworks /Chore Service 1
Unknown: 1
Housing Assistance 3
Size One: 2 Three: 0
Two: 0 Four +: 0 Senior Companion Program 1
Female Head of Household: 2 Utility Discount Programs 1
Type of Dwelling Other 2
Private Home: 2
Mobile Home: 0
Senior Housing: 0
Apartment: 0
Other: 0
INDIVIDUALS IN HOUSEHOLDS: 2
Age Under 60: 0 70 -74: 0
60 -64: 0 75 -79: 1
65 -69: 0 80- +: 1
Sex Female: 2 Mae: 0
Race Asian: 0
Black /African Amer: 0 GROUP CONTACTS: (Senior Clubs, civic
Caucasian /White: 2 groups,city leaders, etc.) - #
Hispanic: 0
Native Amer: 0 *City Hall 2
*All Staff Meeting 120
Disability *TRIAD Meeting 12
Hearing: 0 Mental: 0 *Senior Issues Network mtg 50, 30, 32
Speech: 0 Visual: 0
Emotional: 0 Other: 0
Orthopedic: 1
REOUESTS FOR OUTREACH VISIT FROM {Outreach Worker was on vacation
OUTSIDE SOURCE for two weeks during this time}
Anoka County Human Services 1
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
County Contract No. 97 -2256
WELLHEAD PROTECTION
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the cities of Anoka, Blaine,
Centerville, Circle Pines, Coon Rapids, Fridley, Lexington, Lino Lakes, Ramsey, and Spring Lake
Park (herein "Cities "), and the County of Anoka (herein "County), each acting by and through its
governing body, pursuant to Minn. Stat. §471.59 providing for the joint exercise of powers.
RECITALS:
1. The Cities are now, or will be, required by the Minnesota Department of Health to prepare
wellhead protection plans for their community public water supplies and desire to coordinate
their efforts to develop wellhead protection plans for their communities.
2. The Cities have determined that it is in their best interests to develop a common ground water
model that has common elements for their wellhead protection plans including determination of
wellhead protection areas around their public water supply wells, and desire to jointly use the
services of a consultant for development of portions of their wellhead protection plans.
3. The Cities desire to make a joint decision concerning the best method to determine their needs
and selection of a groundwater model and agree that it is in their interests that the cost for
development of portions of their wellhead protection plans be shared and their respective
responsibilities and obligations be defined.
4. The County is committed to enhancing groundwater protection and public health and fords it to
be in the County's interest to facilitate the joint efforts of the Cities.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements contained herein, and in exercise of
the powers granted by Minn. Stat. § 471.59, the parties to this Agreement agree as follows:
1. PURPOSE
1.1 The Cities and County agree that they have joined together for the purpose of jointly and
cooperatively:
1.1.1 developing common wellhead protection plans for the Cities;
1.1.2 establishing a joint user group to handle activities related to this agreement;
1.1.3 authorizing the County to act as facilitator and as agent contracting for any consultant
services or applying for any grants; and
1.1.4 allocating costs.
2. TERM
2.1 This agreement shall be effective January 1, 1997 and shall continue until terminated as
provided herein.
3. ANOKA COUNTY MUNICIPAL WELLHEAD PLANNING GROUP
3.1 The governing body of each of the Cities shall appoint one person to serve as a member of the
Anoka County Municipal Wellhead Planning Group (herein "Group ").
-1-
County Contract No. 97 -2256
3.2 One alternate member shall be appointed to the Group by the governing body of each of the
Cities. The alternate may attend any meeting of the Group and, when the regular member is
absent, vote on behalf of the party the member represents.
3.3 All members of the Group shall serve at the will and pleasure of the appointing authority. The
appointing authority shall notify the Anoka County Administrator of the member and alternate
member appointed to the Group and shall notify the Anoka County Administrator of any
changes to the appointment.
3.4 Group members shall not be entitled to compensation or reimbursement for expenses incurred in
attending meetings, except to the extent that the appointing authority might determine to
compensate or reimburse the expenses of the member it appoints, in which case the obligation
to make such payments shall be that of the appointing authority.
3.5 The County's Environmental Services Director shall be an exofficio non - voting member of the
Group and shall serve as the facilitator to the Group.
3.6 The first meeting of the Group shall be at 10:00 a.m. on January 2, 1997 at Room 772 in the
Anoka County Government Center, 2100 Third Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota. At the first
meeting, the Group will agree on procedures for its operation.
3.7 A majority of all Group voting members shall constitute a quorum, but less than a quorum may
adjourn a scheduled meeting.
3.8 Recommendations of the Group related to hiring a consultant will require agreement of a party
prior to the party incurring any financial obligation.
4. GROUP RESPONSIBILITIES
4.1 The Group shall have the following responsibilities during Phase I:
4.1.1 to request and review consultant qualifications;
4.1.2 to request and review consultant proposals;
4.1.3 to interview selected consultants;
4.1.4 to develop consultant work plan and costs;
4.1.5 to recommend to the governing bodies of the Cities and County whether to have the
County contract with a consultant under the terms of this agreement;
4.1.6 to recommend a consultant to be engaged by the County under the terms of this
agreement;
4.1.7 to apply for funds from any source it may identify.
4.2 The Group shall have the following responsibilities during Phase II in addition to those set forth
in 4.1:
4.2.1 to provide guidance to the consultant in performing wellhead protection work
authorized in Phase II;
4.2.2 to review and reject or accept consultant work;
4.2.3 to approve payments authorized under this agreement;
4.2.4 to recommend Group Facilitator notify parties of termination of joint powers
agreement upon completion of the Phase II joint powers activities and completion of
the wellhead protection plans for the Cities.
-2-
County Contract No. 97 -2256
5. JOINT POWERS ACTIVITIES
5.1 Activities authorized by this agreement are:
5.1.1 During Phase I, request consultant qualifications, request consultant proposals, review
consultants and proposals, identify wellhead protection needs, develop consultant work
plan, prepare a description of the scope of work, prepare the budget for such work,
interview consultants, and prepare a recommendation for the hiring of a consultant to
perform wellhead protection plan elements identified during Phase I.
5.1.2 During Phase II, administer wellhead protection plan elements identified for Phase 11,
delineate wellhead protection zones in accordance with Minnesota Rules, conduct
related studies and analysis, identify potential contaminant source inventory,
management techniques, and education and outreach activities.
5.2 Prior to commencement of activities in Phase II, the Group Facilitator will send notice to the
Cities of the costs identified for the project. Within thirty days of the receipt of the notice,
each city must either send a letter to the Group Facilitator indicating the city's interest in
participation or provide the other parties with notice of an intention to withdraw from this
agreement in accordance with the requirements of Part 10.1 of this agreement.
5.3 If one or more of the Cities chooses to withdraw following receipt of notice provided in 5.2,
the Group Facilitator will recalculate the costs identified with participation in the project and
send notice of the recalculated cost to the remaining cities. If identified costs increase by more
than 10%, each of the remaining cities will have ten days from receipt of notice of the
recalculated costs to reconsider continued participation. If a city chooses to withdraw, the city
must send the Group Facilitator a letter, within the ten day period, indicating the city will be
taking action to withdraw in accordance with the requirements of Part 10.1 of this agreement.
If additional city or cities choose to withdraw, the Group will reevaluate the work plan and
associated costs before sending out new notices under 5.2.
6. FUNDING
6.1 Funding of consultant costs under this agreement shall be allocated to each member party based
on the proportion that each city's factors represents of the total factors of all participating cities.
The factors to be used shall be equally weighted and shall consist of the following: base
amount, population (Metro population Council estimate of 4/96), service connections, water
appropriation (1993, 1994, and 1995 annual average), number of wells to be studied, and well
risk (1- confined bedrock aquifer; 2- unconfined bedrock; and 3- drift). This initial allocation is
set forth as follows:
Member Percent
Anoka 9.9
Blaine 19.5
Centerville 3.0
Circle Pines 4.1
Coon Rapids 29.0
Fridley 16.3
Lexington 2.7
Lino Lakes 5.2
Ramsey 4.8
Spring Lake Park 5.5
-3-
P
County Contract No. 97-2256
6.2 The costs to be allocated to the cities shall be reduced by the amount of any grants received
before allocation of the costs.
6.3 Each of the Cities shall make payment of its pro -rata share of any authorized activity expense to
the County. Prior to commitment to participate in Phase 11, Cities will have an opportunity to
opt out of participation and withdraw from this agreement prior to incurring an obligation if a
city is not interested in participating in the costs. There is no cost for participation in Phase I,
other than the indirect staffing costs that a party may have.
6.4 Funds paid by the Cities or received from any other source shall be managed by the County.
6.5 Payments from the Cities must be received by the County before the County will incur any
fiscal obligation.
6.6 All funds disbursed by the County pursuant to this agreement shall be disbursed in a manner
that is consistent with the method provided by law for the disbursement of funds by counties.
6.7 A strict accounting shall be made of all funds and a report of all receipts and disbursements
shall be made by the County upon request.
7. COUNTY SERVICES
7.1 The County shall provide services to facilitate and assist the Group in the conduct of its affairs.
The Environmental Services unit of the Anoka County Community Health and Environmental
Services Department shall provide these services.
7.2 The County shall serve as fiscal agent for the Group for purpose of receiving and dispersing
funds as authorized by the Group and entering into contracts or grant applications on behalf of
the Group.
7.3 The County shall maintain records and documents relating to matters that are the subject of this
agreement. All such records shall be retained for a period of at least three years after
termination of this agreement and, upon request of any party, shall be retained for any
additional period requested. The records shall be available for inspection, review and audit by
the parties and the State Auditor as provided by law during regular business hours.
8. CONTRACTS
8.1 Contracts and grant applications made pursuant to this Agreement shall be made by the County
and shall conform to the requirements applicable to the County.
-4-
County Contract No. 97 -2256
9. NONDISCRIMINATION AND COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
9.1 In accordance with the County's Affirmative Action Plan and the County Commissioners'
policy against discrimination, no person shall illegally, on the grounds of race, color, religion,
sex, marital status, sexual orientation, public assistance status, handicap, age, or national origin,
be excluded from full employment rights in, participation in, be denied benefits of, or be
otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program, service or activity hereunder in
accordance with the provisions of any and all applicable federal and state laws against
discrimination.
9.2 During the performance of this agreement, the Group and its agents shall comply with all
applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations, including federal, state and local nondiscrimination
regulations.
10. WITHDRAWAL
10.1 Any party shall have the right to withdraw from this agreement in the following manner:
The governing body of the withdrawing party shall pass a resolution declaring its intention to
withdraw effective on a specified date, which date shall not be less than thirty days from the
date of the resolution, and shall send a copy of the resolution to each party's governing body
not less than thirty days before the effective date of withdrawal.
10.2 Withdrawal by a party shall not result in the discharge of any legal or financial liability incurred
by that party before the effective date of withdrawal.
11. TERMLNATION
11.1 This agreement shall terminate upon completion of the wellhead protection plans for the Cities.
Anoka County, as Group facilitator, shall send a notice of termination to each party upon
completion of the Group's activities.
11.2 This agreement may be terminated upon mutual agreement of the parties by a joint resolution
passed by the parties' governing bodies.
11.3 This agreement shall terminate if, due to the withdrawal of parties, there are less than four
remaining parties to this agreement.
12. DISTRIBUTION OF PROPERTY
12.1 Upon termination of this agreement, any remaining funds or property acquired under the terms
of this Agreement shall be distributed to the parties in proportion to the respective contributions
of the parties.
12.2 Upon termination of this agreement, any payments due and owing or other unfulfilled financial
obligations shall continue to be a lawful obligation of a party.
-5-
County Contract No. 97 -2256
13. NOTICE
13.1 For purposes of notices to be given under this agreement, notices shall be directed as set forth
below:
Anoka City Council Coon Rapids City Council Ramsey City Council
2015 First Ave. North 11155 Robinson Drive 15153 Nowthen Blvd NW
Anoka, MN 55303 Coon Rapids, MN 55433 -3761 Ramsey, MN 55303
Blaine City Council Fridley City Council Spring Lake Paris City
9150 Central Ave. NE 6431 University Ave. NE Council
Blaine, MN 55434 Fridley, MN 55432 1301 81st Ave. NE
Spring Lake Park, MN
Centerville City Council Lexington City Council 55432
1880 Main Strea 4175 Lovell Road Suite 140
Centerville, MN 55038 -9794 Lexington, MN 55014 Anoka County Board
Government Center
Circle Pines City Council Lino Lakes City Council 2100 - 3rd Ave.
200 Civic Heights Circle 1189 Main Street Anoka, MN 55303
Circle Pines, MN 55014 Lino Lakes, MN 55014
14. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
14.1 This joint powers agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties on the matter related
hereto.
14.2 This agreement shall not be altered or amended, except by agreement in writing signed by the
parties hereto.
14.2 The Group may recommend amendments to this agreement to the governing bodies of the
parties for their consideration.
15. SIGNATURES
15.1 All parties to this Agreement need not sign the same copy of the Agreement.
15.2 An original Agreement signed by each party to this Agreement shall be maintained in the Office
of the Anoka County Attorney.
-6-
County Contract No. 97 -2256
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day stated
below:
ounty o n : , a City of Anoka.
B
By: By: f' , !k
Y
Dan Erhart Mayor
Board of Commissioners Chair II A '' II_ II
By: ///��� BY: Y t t a_ L Y Li r?
7 "Jay" c den City Manager
County Q
Coun A ministrator
Dated: a J - 35- -97 Dated: rP. ru 3, 1997
Approved as to form:
Pamela McCabe
Assistant County Attorney
11h41:Jc 11/1396
M:\E.SU9RC\WELJIEADJPA
-7-
County Contract No. 97 -2256
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day stated
below:
is
Co . • • : . olca City of klLt.4_
if iir
B By: /_._.4. •
i an Erhart or
Board of Commissioners Chair
B J ' te a — By: ice V 4 A
ohn " inden City an g-
County Administrator
Dated: (9 -as ' -9 7 Dated: 12 - 1 2 - 91
Approved as to form:
B - . i ���4 �/_,
Pamela McCabe
Assistant County Attorney
RMNsk 11/13/96
M:WrMISC\WPLIJIPLDJPA
- 7
I
County Contract No. 97 -2256
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day stated
below:
Co of Anoka _ City of Centerville
By � t
Dan Erhart Mayor (Tom Wilharber)
Board of Commissioners Chair
By: By: 411W,
hn ay" cL' den C er (James March)
County Administrator
Dated: 02 c2-s--77 Dated: /!3/ 94
Approved as to form:
Bye
Pamela McCabe
Assistant County Attorney
RSQiak 11/1336
MaESIMLSCIWCi.RE DJPA
- 7
County Contract Nn 97 -22$6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day sta "' D
below:
C� L E 7 , c-s i ntlA
Coun of Anoka City of
9NOKACOLIN
'WAN SERV ' '
By: IA • /
Dan Erhart or
Board of Commissioners Chair
B v t (/
hn "J cLind ity Manager
County Administrator
Dated: 0 7 - a5' — 4 7 Dated:
/ /4
Approved as to form:
By iri <
Pamela McCabe
Assistant County Attorney
RMH:.k 11/1396
M:IFSIMISC WELUIEADJPA
-7-
County Contract No. 97 -2256
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day stated
below:
County of Anoka City of
By: C......_ By:
an Erhart Mayor
Board of Commissioners Chair
// i
By: By: a /A ✓ii Q. —
hn "Jay c den ity Man f
County Administrator
Dated: o? QS —9 `j Dated: /0 — t 7 - ? 6
Approved as to form:
By: tr _i ✓// �% '
' amela McCabe
Assistant County Attorney
RMHok 11113/96
M:WSS4LSC1WELL1fADJPA
- 7-
County Contract No. 97 -2256
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day stated below:
County of Anoka City of Fridley
By By: 4
Dan Erhart aU 0 o . '
Board of Commissioners Chair May
By . ` By: 411 ' _
John ` ay" cLin en William W. Burns
County Administrator City Manager
Dated: a -as-- 9 1 Dated: a /// 6/47
Approved as to form:
e /1/�L�
By /ice /�
Pamela McCabe
Assistant County Attorney
Raul:.. 11/13/96
a i\ES\MISC\WEW1EADrre
7
County Contract No. 97 -2256
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day stated
below:
County of Anoka 1 City of LL e e x. j-cov�
By: .0 \ By: �O' o�
an Erhart Mayor
Board of Commissioners Chair
4
By: By: At i.,?
n "I M ind City Ma ma er
County dministrator
Dated: & s - - 9 ' 7 Dated: ( l- A \ — et
Approved as to form:
B ".,,, ! / /L!.i! _/ —%
Pamela McCabe
Assistant County Attorney
RMil:.k 11/13/96
tot■ESVALTIC \ WELU1EADJPA
RECEIVED
BY C.F.
i
.. a1 r . `fr
I .
_7-
—
County Contract No. 97 -2256
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day stated
below:
County of Anoka City of Lino Lakes
Y
B : f By:
Dan Erhart M or
Board of Commissioners Chair
B By;. /1 G' ') , �Z/t.Gb7 L
ohn 1 M inden Clerk- Treasurer
County Admi istrator
Dated: a -a<cr -9'7 Dated: December 9, 1996
Approved as to form:
BY /// e C / �.ti,
Pamela McCabe
Assistant County Attorney
RMHak 11/13/96
M:tESMISC.W ELLHE ADJPA
I t
-7-
I
County Contract No. 97 -2256
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day stated
below:
County of Anoka City of ?Prntif
By: BM-0-.• ��—
Dan Erhart Mayor
Board of Commissioners Chair
By. B ...� A)�,! h , • iJ /1 it
John "J ind l ikta Manager
County Administrator
Dated: r� -o"t�5 = Dated: 1�- i_/9lO /
Approved as to form:
so" , 2
BY: .;
Pamela McCabe
Assistant County Attorney
Mat 11113/96
IAKIESVALSC w¢uH.ADJPA
-7-
County Contract No. 97 -2256
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day stated
below:
County of Anoka City of • "" - • . rk , MN
B BY: �41A
Dan Erhart .yor arley Wells
Board of Commissioners Chair
By: � By: i 01 ifs
o "J inde City Manager Barbara L. Nelson
County Administrator
Dated: 02 -mss -9 7 Dated: / - / l
Approved as to form:
BY: / / /� / /���
�'amela McCabe
Assistant County Attorney
RMHmk 11/13%
M:WSMIRCWWaIMEADJPA
-7-
•
GREGORY J. HE' LUNG
Attorney at Law
13000 Crooked Lake Blvd.
Coon Rapids, MN 55448
(61 2) 755-0576
r\X: (612) 7557256
MEMORANDUM
TO The Centerville City Council yj
FROM Greg Hellings, Centerville City Attorney
DATE: Febntary 27, 1997
RE:: Central Park Lot Split
Please consider this memorandum as my legal opinion arid authorization in the above referenced
matter. As you are aware. when the survey was completed prior to the City's acquisition of the
Central Park property fi on the LaMoite trust, it was determined that two ot'the adjoinina properties
had boundary line problems to the extent that fences and other appurtenant structures %%ere
determined to be on the property owned by the Trust and proposed to he sold to the City. Please see
the enclosed diagram. As Such, the City Council determined with input from the Planning
Commission and the Park and Recreation Comnvssion that the Trust should sell the property
diagramed on the enclosure to the respective adjoining property owners. This has now been
completed and the City has acquired the remaining land for Central Park,
In reviewing City records. no notation can be found that this lot spirt was ever formally approved by
the City of Centerville. Lot Split approval is necessary in order for all parties to record the deeds for
these land transfers. My notes indicate that the lot split was to have been considered by the
appropriate City bodies in March or April of 1996 and is confirmed by a writing to the former City
Clerk. However, no record of these discussion can he found in the official City minutes I understand
that the lot split was officially approved by the City Council at their February 26, 1997 City Council
Meeting. tinder the circumstances, it rs my opinion that this consideration is sufficient tier the lot split
situation since the property is now owned by the Cite and the history suggests that this was
previously considered by the appropriate City agencies
C,JI "li
Enclosure
cc: Rv -Chet Gaustad, City Clerk
•
•
:.: ; ., y - 1i
•
....- ;: �:..... -Jut'+
(f7
0 l
W! /36R / ' 01 .-1s p r"w
52 F3" • - , - f- - - -_ pzocd, c
;ter y il
/, �ro
►r J
1 f£ ,t> t x
I . • rap ; .::.azr-�`'..�.s...� .. .., --+. rates T — �...... ._ 3:. - a
I t
ye; NJ PPFF k /aim, .
w l i
a WI . . -
1 (',) _ Yaw
$ , E F ALL < 1 w
Pi
. ra.,/ .____ • �t ' f -a s
Y •:> 4
4 7 ,, . e ‘• 1 Ck Q�' t it . "'
° ea) si
i i yy �t f stao )c
Y W
C;11° Pay N -3x. ^tots 757: cti ' jI�'T'
Prona CC
N -..._ 1
pna�• w.«
t6
Fax -; - ,
•
,a tsfe Fu G
.I/
i
11.4i L... .
C C F
1
• L&
111 St March 5, 1997
File: 260 - 094 -90
fOiSI1TISG EIGIMS
Mr. Jim March
1326 Energy Park Drive Administrator
St. Paul, MN 55108 City of Centerville
612-6444389 1880 Main Street
1-800- 888-2923 Centerville, MN 55038
Fax: 612-644-9446
RE: LAURIE LAMOTTE PARK IMPROVEMENTS - TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY
Dear Mr. March:
As we discussed at the February 26th Council meeting, we have prepared an exhibit
rY 8. P P
showing the proposed layout of Laurie LaMotte Park. This layout was provided to us by
the Park and Recreation Committee.
We would be pleased to provide topographic surveying services to the City of Centerville
for this project. We know the City is concerned about keeping costs for the project low.
CIVIL ;NG'NEEi NG'
Therefore, we are committed to providing these services at the lowest possible cost. We
eaviecrvn,eraAL propose to use 1 -inch contours provided to us by Mark Hurd Aerial Photography. This area
PAL was flown in 1993. For an area the size of this parcel, this will be the most cost- effective
PL‘N%'NC;
way to generate topography on the site. The topographic data could then be verified when
r: c *uaAL we have survey crews in the City doing staking for construction work, thus saving
crwG mobilization costs.
scar r N We propose to complete the topographic survey for the park property at a not -to- exceed
cost of $2,280. Please let us know if you would like us to proceed with scheduling this
_rt.AL ;»D =,N)CAL work.
E ,GiNEERNG.
We look forward to working with the City of Centerville Council and Park and Recreation
:3119 DISTRLLMCN Committee on this project. If you have any questions, please let us know.
3'S7E,t C0N7 Ct5 Sincerely,
MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS,
l ottA L A my f iv
David E. Nyberg, P.E.
Project Manager
CFF!C. 5 N. DEN:tw
i+ ".EAPCLIS 000 -0311.mar
PP;CR LIKE
S •
WASECA
Art Equal Opportunity Employer