Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-02-26 1 CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 1997 CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETING 1. Watermain Interconnect Project APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. City Council Meeting of February 12, 1997 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS 1. City of Centerville - February 13 - 26 2. Centennial Fire District - February 20, 1997 SET AGENDA PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS APPEARANCES 1. Annual Fire Report - Milo Bennett 2. Michael Navin - Grading LaMotte Park OLD BUSINESS 1. Surface Water Management Plan a. Fee Analysis b. Met Council - Comprehensive Plan Update NEW BUSINESS COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. EDC request approval to call a public hearing for updating the downtown area ADMINISTRATOR REPORT I. Employee Education CONSENT AGENDA 1. Church of St. Genevieve - Lawful Gambling ADJOURN CONSENT AGENDA MEMORANDUM DATE: February 26, 1997 TO: City Council of City of Centerville FROM: Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk RE: LaMotte Property - Lot Split The LaMotte Park Property was sold to the City on December 20, 1996. Two small pieces of the parcel were not transferred. LaMottes are in the process of selling 40.2' to the Woiaks at 6925 Centerville Road. Second is the Barrot's at 6953 Centerville Road, the parcel is 8' x 3' addition to be adjusted to the fence line. LaMottes approached the City Council during the March 27, 1996 council meeting for a lot split approval. At which time the motion was as follows: MOTION by Helmbrecht, seconded by Buckbee to have Tom Wilharber work with the LaMottes and staff to work on the details for the surveys. Woiaks to purchase the property from the LaMottes. And adjust the property line at 6953 Centerville Road to the fence line. Motion carried Unanimously. LaMottes Attorney, Steve Butts requested the City Council approve the lot split. Greg Hellings suggested the City Council approve the lot split as everything is okay with him. 1 1 ' itti.t1 • ":. / 1 • . 1 I I 1 ‘ . wzN Y. T . ,.. 4 • i , ... c.. r 1 t 1 Ea .i. 1 ; ___...„--. 1 .. ....i. ,—. ...— • , • • • / ..... .. C. . , ;,4' • • c . 10 . ) I 1 CO i i 1 ru { . , ., . . .._. . , 1 /00 , I I I • i \ ihN)3/41:- r --- /00 i 1 A--. . III . ■ --- 1 1 /KO I ! -," „1 1„. l ielS 4 'Jo - • • i Z ;•,, --4 ,:o: 1, . t ' * ; . ..' tb €; • .— . \ , 1 . ii ..... . . - ,...... N. 1 , .. I , .... - . X ..e. ai r • ... , . i I I: ' % ' te 1 .° ' ' ./ 0 ... • / 03. 3 . .94 . . 2 .41 ' — - Eit ..,es , ... 72 ..5 st) ROAD} - z.: - - - „::-..,.._,,ne „.,-- • N . • ,. . I .41 ife I ‘p ..\ b rya Is. 60 ,1., N. . N O n e.' ...... - 1`: 411 t (4 I •••-. A ,.,.. tc So ..." . 0 'Ice fir \ ‘ i k‘ IN) t." \. il 1 r\)-■ k . .• ...... ... '50 )URVILLE CIRCLE iii (mi.\ •va.. t 8E059 NW 19 11!mall-La3 7//4 00 Pa ilS Liiew 0881 .I I e .r..0 ammapia0 30 483 78 4 5- ''''''. r . C. i ‘ 'h ' L I ‘ DATE : February 26, 1997 TO Honorable Mayor y and Council FROM : Jim March RE ADMINISTRATOR REPORTS 1. I will be entering into a contract with Edgar Inglis and Associates of Columbia, SC to recover Federal Excise taxes paid by the City on gasoline purchases for the last three years. The City should be due a refund of approximately $1000. 2. Accounting software from Banyon Data Systems has been ordered along with a computer with enough memory and capacity to handle the software. (These items were both budgeted for) 3. Building permit is ready for Automotive Driveline so they can begin construction in the industrial park. 0;iound a. r4 j 4. Strategic planning meeting reminder. Scheduled for 7:30W Saturday morning on March 8, 1997. 5. New receptionist is working well. Scheduled for two days one week, three the next week. Ry- chel's six month probation is complete on Friday, February 28. Ry -chel is an asset to the City and is progressing well in her position. I recommend that Ry -chel be placed on permanent full -time status. 6. Union contract is in final draft form and will be available for the next council packet. 7. Paul is gathering quotes for street crack filling and is working on a schedule for sewer televising and cleaning. Ua IOLU red '-tAs r. Lmtrucf t vas enxpnoec. 8. Two items were passed out FYI at the meeting that Tom received from the Chief of Police regarding trails at Lakeland Hills and a Pawn Shop Ordinance CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 1997 CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETING 1. Watermain Interconnect Project APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. City Council Meeting of February 12, 1997 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS 1. City of Centerville - February 13 - 26 2. Centennial Fire District - February 20, 1997 SET AGENDA PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS APPEARANCES 1. Annual Fire Report - Milo Bennett 2. Michael Navin - Grading LaMotte Park OLD BUSINESS 1. Surface Water Management Plan a. Fee Analysis b. Met Council - Comprehensive Plan Update NEW BUSINESS COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. EDC request approval to call a public hearing for updating the downtown area ADMINISTRATOR REPORT 1. Employee Education CONSENT AGENDA I. Church of St. Genevieve - Lawful Gambling ADJOURN P.O2/02 FEB - 20 -1997 10 30 iISI MEMORANDUM (01SLITRC MINIM I 226 Energy Park Drirc To; Mr. Tim March, Administrator sl. Pou, MN 55108 From: David E. Nyberg, P.E U/yJ t _(/LWa 612.644.4389 Subject: Council Agenda Items - February 26, 1997, Council Meeting 1.800 - 888.2923 Date: February 20, 1997 F. 612- 644 -9446 File: 260- 000 -00 Below is a summary of the items on the agenda concerning City of Centerville engineering issues: 1. Public Informational Meeting We have provided a copy of the materials that will be distributed to those attending the public informational meeting for the watennain interconnect project. Total a,.ENGNEEP,NC. project costs are included in the packets. We could also provide the estimated eNra ^.4,,eN:aE assessment tables at the meeting. Please let us know :f you would like these MUNC AL distributed. The tables would be identical to those previously provided to the `An::.r.'C, Council in the draft feasibility study. s2iD WASTE 5'a921.P•,l 2. Comprehensive Water Plan and Surface Water Management Plan suPiarcrz RAMC The Meiropolitan Council has requested submittal of the above two plans the City 'fANSPeRrnCN of Centerville is currently working on. As authorized at the workshop on February 4, 1997, we will be meeting with City staff the week of February 24 to review final EtE;t ' tA-" " CiAN ' t° changes to the Comprehensive Water Plan. We will then be submitting the final water plan to the Met Council. -vat FOWER „Tk6UriCN Da The significant ponion of the work remaining on the Surface Water Management Plan includes the Stormwater Fee -Analysis. We recommend submitting the plan to the required agencies without the Fee Analysis included, completing this under separate cover, The Fee Analysis is not a direct requirement of the plan. We should discuss this with the Council on the February 26 to receive direction. OFFICES ;ft DEN:kh 000- 2006.reb MINNEAPOLS PRIOR LAKE Sr PAUL WASECA An Enna! Onnonundv Emolover TOTAL P. 02 L. ISM - terville MIS! L)1. SINEW ftga6Iisned 1857 CITY OF CENTERVILLE PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETING 20th Avenue Watermain Interconnect and Trunk Sanitary Sewer System February 26, 1997 6:00 p.m. Centerville Council Chambers Tom Wilharber, Mayor Sanna Buckbee, Council Member Mary Jo Helmbrecht, Council Member Theresa Brenner, Council Member Laura Powers - Rasmussen, Council Member Jim March, Administrator Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk • David Nyberg, City Engineer 260/085- 1814.feb II Sk tervvlle G9YSPLTIYGBIGINFERS -a Established ran AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER II. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I. PROJECT COST IV. PROJECT SCHEDULE V. PROPERTY OWNER QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS VI. ADJOURN 260/085- 1814.feb }1St � terville fII.VSEGT9VGNdGINEENS LstaALw"d 1857 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS • Watermain Interconnect • Watermain Meter Vault ■ Hydrants ■ Sanitary Sewer Trunk • Lift Station • Future Connection Points • Erosion Control ■ Turf Restoration - Sodding - Seeding 260/085- 1814.feb �� P' ;terviZle EOISI'CTI16EICINEEES dataDliaStd rats WATERMAIN INTERCONNECTION COSTS Construction Costs Restoration $ 27,500 Watermain Interconnection Including Services 274,000 TOTAL $274,500 SANITARY SEWER COSTS Construction Costs Restoration $ 27,500 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Including Services 161,100 TOTAL $188,600 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $463,100 260/085- 1814.feb terville t'A.TSI'CTISC MINEflS OTHER (NONASSESSMENT) COSTS Water Availability Charge (WAC): Water availability charges are the costs to connect to and become a part of the Centerville water system. This charge pays for the costs associated with water systems such as elevated storage, water treatment facilities, and maintenance. Sewer Availability Charge (SAC): Sewer availability charges are the costs to connect to and become a part of the Centerville sewer system. This charge pays for the costs associated with the sewer system, such as lift station rehabilitation, sewer cleaning, and maintenance. Property Owner Costs The individual property owner will be responsible for the connection between the property line and the individual building. Because of the many different configurations, this cost varies considerably, and is difficult to estimate. Property owners may also have costs associated with taking individual well systems and septic systems out of service. The City Ordinance requires property owners to connect to the sewer once sewer service is available. 260/085- 1814.feb ilSk terville L SELTISG MINERS I!tCMUMM 1857 PROJECT SCHEDULE Public Informational Meeting February 26, 1997 Public Hearing April 1997 Authorize Plans and Specifications April 1997 Plan Approval and Order Advertisement for Bids May 1997 Bid Opening June 1997 Assessment Hearing June 1997 Council Awards Project July 1997 Begin Construction July 1997 Construction Complete October 1997 260/085- 1814.feb c \/ o 600 W N 0 I ' x OW= e / Z — } . MAIN STREET C.S.A.H. NO. 14 U 010 ± ARK— NE .c P a MI 8 U S T 41�� • gjelbar 3 \— o I SHEENY LLI • cc 0 J 0 L P . in u..,, z Ps' c ,S �P \\ I Z HERMAN STRELOW I. ° a :� a , b KENCO . Z >- y A" • 0 JOYCE STEVENS 0,1 KE B" NCO 1 TER I — — — — — — CARPE REE I v1ANUFAdTURIN Z N __ i Z GERALD REHBEIN REHBEIN INC. -- -- A "_ — REHBEIN INC. • — 6_' ' C— — — CEDAR sTREET CITY O F LINO LAKE S CV085EX 20TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS C NPFN o Q lP J LOCATION MAP C r e : . ; .. tervtll e CONSULTING SNEERS Established 1857 N LEGEND: ,, O 600 — — EXISTING WATERMAIN tti■I•m PROPOSED WATERMAIN t., u') M / ci �' • anm Z its , ' "t 'SEE — S .. C.S.A.H. N0. 14 = e o 0 tiro' . _ RE rat y � US iR I � � 7 I I o z co to' Rog „� S , p vi EXISTING 10 "WATERMAIN to 1 '. 4 . I w 1 0 A- z O 2 LL V O c C . § I _ -_ - PAS" I -.- �U G I I ( la 1 / 1 0 o METER VAULT . N /-...... • _ _ . CEDAR SWEET . CITY O F likLINO L AKE S CVOSSEX EXISTING 16" WATERMAIN IllSt 20TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS -" C �'{CilO o OU P - 2 PROPOS WATERMAIN _ -- -. ? term, 112 CONSULTING MIS Established 1857 4 LEGEND: ,/ EXISTING FORCEMAIN 0 600 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER -la PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER . - - - • PROPOSED 4 "FORCEMAIN in M „. — t / } 3 • T '�, MAIN STREET - . . C.S.A.H. NO. 14 = 0 LE F .� PARK - j • I z Y LL . -.. 0 b _ _ Z d J PROPOSED SANITARY i zz SEWER UNDER SEPARATE CONTRACT. , ■ a° w "I' I m n ■ PROPOSED 4" FORCEMAIIN 1 o OAKS y I V I 0 - % v • 1 ■ _ _ giF LIFT STATION 1 Iz i / _ _ I / N / , — --L. . _ _ _ CEDAR STREET CITY 0 F LINO LAKES • CV085EX 20TH - AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS - " [ {IKU o Q4 I _ PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER r .:. t e CONSOLIINC BKCINEEBS Established 1857 [ CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12,1997 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City Council of the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled council meeting on February 12, 1997, at City Hall. Mayor Tom Wilharber called the council meeting to order at 6:10 PM. PRESENT: Mayor Tom Wilharber Council members: Mary Jo Helmbrecht Theresa Brenner Sauna Buckbee Laura Powers - Rasmussen STAFF /CONSULTANTS: Jim March David Nyberg Ry -Chel Gaustad APPROVAL OF MINUTES: City Council Meeting of January 22, 1997 MOTION by Helmbrecht, seconded by Brenner to approve the January 22, 1997 minutes with corrections. Wilharber yes, Buckbee yes, Helmbrecht yes, Brenner yes, Powers - Rasmussen abstained. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS: City of Centerville January 23 - 31. 1997 MOTION by Brenner, seconded by Powers- Rasmussen to approve the receipts and disbursements of January 23 - 31. Motion carried unanimously. City of Centerville February 1 12, 1997 MOTION by Brenner, seconded by Helmbrecht to approve the receipts and disbursements of February 1 -12. Motion carried unanimously. Centennial Fire District February 6, 1997 MOTION by Helmbrecht, seconded by Brenner to approve the Centennial Fire Districts disbursements of February 6, 1997. Motion carried unanimously. Pay Estimate #10 Acorn Creek Helmbrecht asked the remaining retainage. Nyberg commented it has not been changed or reduced from the $15,000. City Council Meeting February 12, 1997 MOTION by Helmbrecht, seconded by Brenner to approve pay estimate #10 for Acorn Creek, Motion carried unanimously. Lifetime Achievement Award March explained Mary Capra received a $433.78 quote for thirty frames and mats for the Lifetime Achievement Awards. Helmbrecht asked where will the funds be taken from? Brenner mentioned a $1,000 was donated to Centerville s Historical Society from the Centerville Lion's. The donation would be used to purchase the frames and mats. MOTION by Brenner, seconded by Powers - Rasmussen to approve the purchase of the thirty frames and mats. Motion carried unanimously. SET AGENDA: Eagle Pass MOTION by Brenner, seconded by Powers - Rasmussen to approve the set agenda with the discussion of Eagle Pass addition. Motion carried unanimously. APPEARANCES: • . _ �.:. • • ; . Mr. Wiegert explained he has worked with Centerville for many years, supplying hydrants, infrastructures and the like. Mr. Wiegert was present to explain the automated technology of three meter reading systems: Touch Read, Radio Read and Phone Read. The Touch Read is a hand held unit which reads used units at each house. Radio Read has a Meter Transceiver (MXU) which sends out a marked tone to retrieve information then deactivates the battery. The Radio Read is used from a vehicle and has a $20.00 battery that last eight to ten years. The Phone Read has a Meter Interface Unit (MIU) which allows the city to retrieve used units on demand, the information is sent to a computer where the data is calculated. The Phone Read system is hooked up to a RH' jack therefore does not require a battery. During installation and programming the computer uses a "call inbound technology" option which rings only to the meter not to the phone. If the city needs an immediate reading there are two retrieving options available First, the "Tone Initiator" is available if no one is home or there is no answering machine. Second, is the "Ring Initiator" letting the phone ring 128 seconds or roughly 16 rings, which activates the reading system to call the computer and give a read out If the resident makes a call when the computer is gathering information the computer will dislodge itself from the system then try at another time. Mr. Wiegert would encourage a community like Centerville to review the opportunities available. Mr. Wiegert suggested looking at these alternatives with the city's current 2 Jr City Council Meeting February 12, 1997 development growth. Mr. Wiegert felt a majority of the cost would be absorbed by the builders and installation is simple in new developments. Mayor Wilharber asked the cost of the Radio Read unit? Mr. Wiegert said the Radio Read is $125 per unit. Buckbee asked if the city could use a Touch Read with the current system? Mr. Wiegert said yes. The Touch Read is $8,500 per hand held unit and includes star software and two days training. Wilharber asked how long is the warranty on the hand held unit? Mr. Wiegert said one year. Although Mr. Wiegert wouldn't recommend a warranty since they are durable plus he seldom sees a repair bill over $150 Wilharber asked if there is any problems with bushes or trees getting in the way? Mr. Wiegert explained with the Touch Read an obstacle will be an issue but with the Radio and Phone Read there is no problems with obstacles. Lakeland Rills Preliminary Plat Approval Mr. Black of Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. requested rezoning from R -3 to R -2 and Preliminary Plat Approval for 34 acres which consists of 40 single residential homes. Mr. Black briefed the council on the issues addressed at the Planning and Zoning meeting. Continuing one corner lot had a 40 feet rear set back which had to be changed. Royal Oaks complied with the minimal corner lot issues which adjusted the 41 lots to a 40 lot plan. Mr. Black has spent several hours working with wetland committees to minimize the wetland impact. Currently Royal Oaks is working with Mr. Neld of the Army Corp of Engineers to obtain a permit for any wetland impacts the roads may cause. Because of wetland impacts Royal Oaks will attempt at one of two permits. One is a local permit which could take up to six months to receive or a nation wide permit which could be issued at the time of applying. Mr. Black explained there has been discussion of purchasing an easement with Mr. Bill Lalonde which didn't go very well now, Royal Oaks will pursue an easement from the Elementary School. Another utility issue is to either loop the watermain across the creek or down Peltier Lake Drive. If the Council is interested Royal Oaks is willing to pay some costs associated with running the watermain down Peltier Lake Drive. Mr. Black explained Royal Oaks, is looking to complete Lakeland Hills project within a couple years so the watermain could be addressed at later date. March spoke with the Park and Recreation Committee, they would prefer park dedicated funds instead of park land dedication. March asked if the Hensel house would be removed from the project? Mr. Black said yes. March asked Nyberg to discuss construction of the 200 feet of road. Nyberg, City Engineer explained they would have to allow settlement plates to settle which takes about six months. Nyberg suggested the road would need to be surcharged for approximately six months. Nyberg suggested looking into these issues further as the project continues. Brenner asked how would the city know how the road will hold up? Nyberg commented this will be similar to some areas on Peltier Lake Drive. Brenner questioned the City's 3 City Council Meeting February 12, 1997 current problem with Peltier Lake Drive. Nyberg explained this road will be on higher ground so there shouldn't be a problem. Helmbrecht asked if the school was aware of the trail location and if that works with their plan. Mr. Black commented the school has seen the plans and are comfortable with the trail leading to the ball fields. Wilharber clarified the road location being discussed for the viewing audience. The road is the north entrance into the proposed Lakeland Hills Development located on the Hensel property. Powers- Rasmussen asked if all the issues from the City Engineer's letter dated January 30, 1997, had been addressed. Nyberg had discussed several of the issues with Planning and Zoning, a variance is needed for the block exceeding 620 feet in length but this is a formality. Nyberg explained one issue from the Planning and Zoning which should be discussed is the center islands. Mr. Black proposed two $10,000 maintenance free center islands at each entrance. Mayor Wilharber asked which agencies Royal Oaks is referring to, in the letter dated January 28th? Mr. Black explained they are currently scheduled to go before RCWD on February 26th. Further, Royal Oaks is working with the Army Corp of Engineers for a nation wide wetland permit. Mr. Black has been in contact Roger Butler at Anoka County Highway Department for an access permit off Co. Rd. 14. Finally, they are working with the DNR on minimizing wetland impact. Brenner has not seen the Planning and Zoning minutes from the last two meetings and would rather hear their input prior to approval. Mr. Black mentioned the R -2 district in this area would satisfy the zoning ordinance requirements. Mayor Wilharber commented the City Administrator and City Engineer both were present at the Planning and Zoning meetings and have addressed any issues. Mr. Qamhieh requested the new and existing grading plans and suggested the council consider restricting drainage to the east. Nyberg commented the elevation of grading will not affect Mr. Qamhieh's property. Mayor Wilharber commented since the Army Corp of Engineers, Rice Creek Watershed District and DNR are looking at these plans they should catch any potential problems. Nyberg commented the developers have done everything possible to direct the water away from the east. Mr. Bill Lalonde of 1687 Westview Street discussed issues he hoped the council would think about. Mr. Lalonde wouldn't like dog kennels or yipping dogs. Although the park board would rather have the park money instead of park land, he felt the city should have a park in this area. He was totally for sidewalks leading to the school path, it shouldn't be grass and was in favor of curb and gutters. Mr. Lalonde mentioned the meeting with the developer and the school didn't go well since the developer didn't want anymore water running on their property. Mr. Lalonde 4 City Council Meeting February 12, 1997 described the past drainage in 1979 - whatever came off the ball field road drained onto his land. Mr. Lalonde does not want to sump out the water nor loose any more trees. Mayor Wilharber asked what role the city plays between the school and Mr. Lalonde's property. Mr. Lalonde explained he would rather have Mr. Black obtain an easement with the school instead of from him. Mayor Wilharber asked who was at the meeting with the developer and the school? Mr. Black identified Mr. Gary Karpella, Mr. Bill Martin, Mr. Phil Behrind, Mr. Lalonde and himself were at the meeting. Mr. Lalonde requested the council not approve the project until the water issue is resolved. Further, he still feels very strongly about a moratorium on building in Centerville. Mayor Wilharber asked which of the three issues the council would like to discuss first; preliminary plat approval, zoning or the water issue. Nyberg suggested discussing the water issue. Mayor Wilharber explained having the water loop down Peltier Lake Drive is far more advantageous to the city especially with the future need to repair the road. Mayor Wilharber commented he was on the council when Peltier Lake Drive was done in 1987. The council did what they could with the money and technology available. Mayor Wilharber felt the watermain should run down Peltier Lake Drive since it will off set the assessments to the residents. Helmbrecht would like it to run down Peltier Lake Drive but questioned the cost. Nyberg discussed option three of his letter dated February 5, 1997. Nyberg suggested quoting out a couple different options and award bids accordingly. Buckbee felt if the city runs the watermain down Peltier Lake Drive then the road should be reconstructed. Helmbrecht requested concrete amounts available from TIF and the Road Maintenance Fund. Mayor Wilharber commented running the watermain across the creek would only make a couple people mad, but the best interest of the city is to run the watermain down Peltier Lake Drive. Mr. Lalonde said the best interest of the city is to run the watermain down Peltier Lake Drive Powers - Rasmussen suggested looking into some creative financing options. Further, she felt the best interest of the city is to run the watermain down Peltier Lake Drive and redo Peltier Lake Drive and do it right. Brenner felt she may have a slight conflict of interest if the watermain cross' the creek since it would take place in her neighborhood therefore she would rather not vote. Helmbrecht would like to see the watermain run down Peltier Lake Drive but would like the road done right. Nyberg felt with the new available materials and Geo -Tech the road would be much better than Peltier Lake Drive. Buckbee felt it would be best to run the watermain down Peltier Lake Drive and thought we could budget for the road then perhaps do it in a few years. 5 City Council Meeting February 12, 1997 Mr. Qamhieh asked why the road wasn't done right since it was redone in 1987? Mr. Qamhieh felt the road was done haphazardly and felt there should be an Engineer Inspector. Nyberg responded the roads should be seal coated regularly. Nyberg drove down Peltier Lake Drive and didn't notice any dips or sways. Rezoning Lakeland HiIJ from 113 to R2 MOTION by Buckbee, seconded by Hehnbrecht to rezone the proposed Lakeland Hills from R3 to R2 contingent upon the final plat approval. Mayor Wilharber yes, Helmbrecht yes, Brenner yes, Buckbee yes, Powers - Rasmussen absent. Preliminary Plat Approval for Lakeland Aillc MOTION by Helmbrecht, seconded by Mayor Wilharber to approve the preliminary plat for Lakeland Hills contingent upon Army Corp of Engineers, RCWD, DNR all agencies and Engineers approval. Mayor Wilharber yes, Helmbrecht yes, Buckbee yes, Powers - Rasmussen nay, Brenner abstained. Set Informational Public Meeting Hearing for Peltier Lake Drive MOTION by Buckbee, seconded by Helmbrecht to set the Peltier Lake Drive Public Information Meeting on April 2, 1997, at 7:00 PM. Motion carried unanimously. Eagle Pass Helmbrecht questioned the sewer connection areas in Eagle Pass? Nyberg explained the sewer drains from Dupre and connects on Main Street where it drains south to north_ Helmbrecht asked what the tree planting agreement was with Eagle Pass, since some builders are requesting the home owners plant the trees. Nyberg said he would check the Developers Agreement. Helmbrecht mentioned several people building in Eagle Pass have commented on the cost of building permit fees. Wel head Protection Plan- Joint Powers Agreement Gaustad explained the US EPA is requiring the Minnesota Department of Health to complete the states delineation's, The State Health Department was present at the last Wellhead Protection Meeting and suggested completing the required profiles for Anoka County JPA cities at no cost to the cities or county. MOTION by Buckbee, seconded by Helmbrecht to ratify the JPA Group recommendation to discontinue the Phase I consultant selection process; and authorize commencement of the Phase II work set forth in parts 1, 2, and 3 of the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) proposal at zero cost to the city. Motion carried unanimously. Facilitator for Strategic Plan March suggested the Brimeyer proposals and suggested setting a date. MOTION by Buckbee, seconded by Helmbrecht to direct city staff to authorize Brimeyer to facilitate a meeting at the time of the facilitators request. Motion carried unanimously. 6 City Council Meeting February 12, 1997 Cable Resolution 97 - 04 MOTION by Helmbrecht, seconded by Brenner to appoint Sanna Buckbee as the Cable Member and James March as alternate. Motion carried unanimously. Cable Resolution 97 MOTION by Buckbee, seconded by Helmbrecht to approve transferring community television programming responsibilities from group west of the North Central Suburbs d/b /a Meredith Cable to the North Central Suburban Cable Communication Commission. Motion carried unanimously. Senior Housing Update Brenner reported Barott's are interested in selling their property to the city. Brenner and March had drove by the house, and said its a nice location being so close to the city center, utilities and sewer and water. Mayor Wilharber thanked Mr. March and Councilmember Brenner for working so hard on this project and agreed with Councilmember Brenner in regards to the location being by the city center and utilities. NEW BUSINESS: Health Insurance - Medica March explained health insurance is one issue holding up the union contract. The union neigotiatiers have requested $335.00 per month for insurance. March explained the city currently has an option to add Medica Select, which would save the city $1,020 a month. In 1996 the City paid $19,388.20 in benefits. March recommended the City continue to pay 50% of the individual health insurance premium for permanent part -time employees up to a maximum of $100 per month. In addition the city pay a flat fee of $150 per month for permanent frill -time employees electing single health insurance coverage. Any amount over the $150 premium will be paid by the employee. ANy amount under the $150 premium can be used for additional life insurance or taken as deferred compensation. March recommended the City adopt a flat fee of $300 per month for permanent full -time employees selecting family health insurance coverage. Any amount over the $300 permium will be paid by employee. Any amount under the $300 premium can be used for purchasing additional life insurance or taken as deferred compensation. MOTION by Helmbrecht, seconded by Brenner to approve the recommendation for health insurance and the maximum premium as per Jim. Motion carried unanimously. COMM1I1'EE REPORT: Mayor Wilharber commented on February 13, he planned to attend the Police Commission Meeting, which is on the same night of the Lions meeting. Mayor Wilharber commented the Lions had asked him to speak but due to the schedule conflict he will not be able to. 7 City Council Meeting February 12, 1997 ADMINISTRATOR REPORT: United Waste March explained a flyer United Waste planned to send out to the residents. The flyer indicated they will be using a brown recycling bag for leaves. Also United Waste has switched to a new appliance pick up day, it will now be Tuesdays instead of Fridays. Garage Door Opener for Public Works March suggested installing a garage door opener for safety reasons at the public works building. The city received two bids on a 1/3 and 1/2 horse power. MOTION by Buckbee, seconded by Helmbrecht to authorize city staff to purchase a 1/2 horse powered garage door opener for public works. Motion carried unanimously. March mentioned the City of Hugo sent the surrounding cities a letter requesting a letter be sent to RCWD to allow the City of Hugo to design a solution for the dam. Council was not in favor of sending a letter to RCWD. March received a letter from Commissioner Margaret Langfeld requesting the cities allow the county to review all plats contiguous with county roads. Wilharber felt it would be more work for city staff and several agencies already review plats. March mentioned Mike Cusick the Cable Commission Administrator is recognizing the Blaine cable representative for her 16 years of service to the cable commission. March suggested Ted Gonsior be recognized for his years of service. Mayor Wilharber thought it was a good idea to recognize Ted and suggested the city staff order a recognition plaque. MOTION by Helmbrecht, seconded by Buckbee to adjourn the February 12, 1997, council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 9:35 PM Respectfully Submitted, Ry -Chel Gaustad City Clerk 8 DATE: February 20, 1997 TO: City Council City of Circle Pines City Council City of Centerville City Council City of Lino Lakes FROM: Milo Bennett SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures and approval for payment of February expenses. Your approval of February expenses as listed on the attached copy of the check register, checks #8831 - 8862 and #11464, in the amount of $ 29,002.99 is hereby requested. MB /al cc: 7 Circle Pines City Council 7 Centerville City Council 7 Lino Lakes City Council 2 File 02/19/97 at 04:38PM CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT PAGE 1 BANK CHECK REGISTER Checking account A11 Periods Up To 02/28/97 Cnc.CK NO DATE TYPE PAID TO / DESCRIPTION CHECK AMOUNT 8831 02/06/97 AP -D WORLD CARGO 1,968.00 8832 02/10/97 RP -D MIKE KASSNER 420.67 8833 02/20/97 AP -D AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES 20.65 8834 02/20/97 AP -D METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY 200.00 8835 02/20/97 AP -D EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. 3,535.38 883E 02/20/97 AP -D COMM CENTER 292.74 8837 02/20/97 AP -D CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT, INC 715.00 8838 02/20/97 AP -D OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY, INC. 118.00 8839 02 /20/97 AP -D DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO 9,930.00 8840 02/20/97 AP -D RANDY ROLSTAD 263.48 8841 02/20/97 RP -D ANOKA CTY FIRE PROTECTION 210.00 02/20/97 AP -D MILO BENNETT 191.59 8843 02/20/97 AP -D FINA OIL & CHEMICAL COMPANY 121.02 8844 02/20/97 RP -D C.P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 6.32 8845 02/20/97 AP--D EBROC 24.10 8846 02/20/97 AP -D MINNCOMM PAGING 8.52 8847 02 /20/97 AP -D MINNCOMM PAGING 13.47 8848 02/20/97 AP -D TECHNICAL REPRODUCTIONS INC. 186.48 8849 02/20/97 AP -D NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY 480.10 8850 02/20/97 AP -D US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 65.00 8851 02/20/97 AP -D AIRTOUCH CELLULAR 17.20 8852 02/20/97 RP -D CY'S UNIFORMS 132.10 8853 02/20/97 AP -D US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 82.04 8854 02/20/97 AP -D US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 64.93 02/20/97 AP -D WALLIN VIDEO PRODUCTIONS 88.61 8856 02/20/97 AP -D RENNIX CORPORATION 9,230.36 ' 02/19/97 at 04:38PM CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT PAGE 2 BANK CHECK REGISTER Checking account All Periods Up To 02/28/97 CHECK NO DATE TYPE PAID TO / DESCRIPTION CHECK AMOUNT 8857 02/20/97 AP—D JOHN GUSE 30,58 8858 02/20/97 AP—D WALDOCH SPORTS 23.66 8859 02/20/97 AP—D ANOKH ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 129.34 8860 02/20/97 AP—D INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF 25.00 8861 02/20/97 AP—D US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 131.15 8862 02/20/97 AP—D US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 55.40 TOTAL MANUAL CHECKS (M): 0.00 TOTAL COMPUTER CHECKS (C): 0.00 TOTAL DIRECT DISBURSEMENTS (D): 28,780.89 TOTAL CHECKS: 28,780.89 • 02/19/97 at 05:27PM AMNPENNacEaREtDi4TRd55rt Page 1 BANK ACCOUNT: Checking account DATE T CHECK NO PAID TO / FOR AMOUNT 02/20/97 D 0 INSPECTION WAGES—NET PAYROLL 222.10 TOTAL AMOUNT OF ALL CHECKS: 282.10 411 Centennial Fire District 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 784 -7472 PROPOSED 1998 BUDGET The attached budget is in most areas the same as 1997. The accounts that increase are due to increased work load or salary increases. Below is a list of the accounts that have increases. The reason for the increases are as follows: Rescue Calls: The number of calls are increasing. Inspection Wages: With new businesses every year these efforts are increasing. This effort, however, is part of the reason we have very few actual fires. • Fire Prevention Wages: We continually spend more time doing these activities. Medical Supplies: History shows us that this account needs to be increased. Part Time Secretary: Salary Adjustment District Chief: Salary Adjustment Payroll Taxes / Benefits: When payroll accounts increase this account also increases. These changes in the budget reflect an increase of just under 2% which should still allow us to reduce the cost per citizen because of growth in the communities. CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT BUDGET Accouit 1996 1997' 1998 Change % Change 5020 Logistic Supplies 1,000 1,000 1,000 0 0.00% 5030 Fire Calls 36,000 32,000 32,000 0 0.00% 5035 Rescue Calls 21,000 28,000 30,000 _ 2,000 7.14% 5040 Training Calls 20,000 20,000 20,000 0 0.00% 5045 Maintenance Drills 8,000 9,000 9,000 0 0.00% 5050 `Inspection Wages 8,000 9,000 12,000 3,000 33.33% 5060 Fire Prevention Wages 3,000 3,000 4,000 1,000 33.33% 5210 Vehicle Maintenance 23,000_ 20,000 20,000 0 0.00% 5211 Fuel and Lube 5,500 5,500 5,500 0 0.00% 5212 Other Maintenance 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 0.00% 5300 Uniforms 2,000 2,000 2,000 0 0.00% 5305 Equipment 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 0.00% 5310 Insurance 28,000_ 25,000 25,000 0 0.00% 5312 Medical Physicals 5,000 3,000 3,000 0 0.00% 5320 Accounting Services 3,200 3,200 3,200 0 0.00% 5325 Legals 2,000 2,000 2,000 0 0.00% 5350 Office Supplies and Printing 4,500 6,000 6,000 0 0.00% 5355 Community Service 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0.00% 5360 Dues and Memberships 2,000 2,000 2,000 0 0.00% 5365 Subscriptions 1,000 1,000 1,000 0 0.00% 5370_ Travel and Conferences /Schools 14,000 14,000 14,000 0 0.00% 5375 Cleaning Supplies and Services 6,000 6,000 6,000 0 0.00% 5380 Telephone 5,000 7,000 7,000 0 0.00% 5385 Utilities 18,000 18,000 18,000 0 0.00% 5390 Medical Supplies 500 500 1,000 500 100.00% 5395 Breathing Air 3,000 3,000 3,000 0 0.00% 5400 Salaried Positions 15,000 15,500 15,500 0 0.00% 5425 Part Time Secretary 9,000 9,000 9,400 400 4.44% 5510 District Chief 48,600 50,500 52,500 2,000 3.96% 5511 Steering Committee Secretary 250 2501 250 0 0.00% 5999 Payroll Taxes and Benefits 13,000 13,500 15,000 1,500 11.11% 0 Total 350,550 353,950 364,350 10,400 2.94% 0 Relief Association 19,000 19,500 20,000 500 2.56% Depreciation 11,237 9,570 9,570 0 0.00% Common Area Charges 28,052 27,149 26,245 (904) -3.33% 0 Total 408,839 410,169 420,165 9,996 2.44% 0 Capital Equipment 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0.00% 0 Total Budget 508,839 510,169 520,165 9,996 1.96% LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: 7 / ' 0 - 4d / DATE: 3 - 6 -97 PROJECT N0. 7 6 9 ewe /o /1 / ATTENTION: /� / UD l ri r C r`I (lea � RE: n (OSSI LTIIG ESGISEEILS 1326 Energy Park Drive St. Paul, MN 55108 -5202 MAR, 1 3199 612- 644 -4389 • Fax 612-644-9446 An Equal Opportunity Employer WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 3 War Sun /y /'h L THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit_ copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 U PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS afier , C Kot 40 e1/404. f COPY TO �J 1/9! SIGNED: (/ // U f 1/ eneleauns on net a noted. kindly notify in N ones. CHAPTER 2 POPULATION AND LAND USE CONSIDERATIONS 2.1 HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT TRENDS Historic population data for the City of Centerville was obtained from the City of Centerville and the Metropolitan Council. The City started experiencing dramatic growth during the 1980s. This growth trend is expected to continue throughout the next 15 to 20 years. Table 2 -1 presents historical data regarding the City of Centerville's total population, number of households, and service connections. As is commonly the case in rural communities such as Centerville, not everyone within the city limits is connected to and served by the City's water system (due to the use of private wells). In fact, not everyone with a service connection uses the, City's water. There are a number of customers who are provided with connections, but who ugh private wells as their source of water. These customers will be added to the City's water systepi over time, as repair or reconstruction of private water systems are not allowed by the City where municipal water is availablep The total population and household data was used to determine the average number of people living in each household, which, along with the number of service connections, was in turn used to find the total number of people served by City water. The data indicates that, while the total population and number of service connections is increasing, the number of persons per connection is decreasing slightly. This is a trend that is occurring throughout the Twin Cities metro area at this time. TABLE 2 - 1. HISTORIC POPULATION, HOUSEHOLD & SERVICE INFORMATION CITY OF CENTERVILLE Total Residential Persons Per Service Service Area Year Population ( i ) Households Household Connections Population 1970 534 147 3.63 N/A N/A 1980 734 214 3.43 N/A N/A 1989 1,395 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1990 1,633 519 3.15 142 447 1991 1,819 581 3.13 181 567 1992 1,968 627 3.14 239 750 1993 2,095 670 3.13 252 788 1994 2,101 688 3.05 279 852 1995 2,230 720 3.10 301 932 1996 2,480 752 3.30 323 2,050 m 0) Household and service connection data was not available for 1989. m 1996 service area population includes Centerville Elementary School population of 900 students. Source: Metropolitan Council and City records. CWP- 260A.080 2 -1 260- 080-25 2.2 CURRENT DEVELOPMENT -1997 F Centerville's City Planners estimate that development within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary as defined through 1996 will accommodate an additional 228 households. All 210 of the potential households within the 1996 -2000 MUSA developments are expected to be served by City 'water. In addition, households provided with service connections that still usg private water sources are expected to be added to the system over time. There are eight of those water service connections from the Clearwater Meadows project, and 23 connections from /he watermain extension to Centerville Elementary School which will eventually be added to the City's system as the private systems become inoperable. 2.3 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND POPULATION FORECAST& The City uses the Metropolitan Council's 1994 blueprint forecasts for population and household numbers. The Metropolitan Council's predicted number of households for the year 2020 is 1,7 0, and the total population projection is 4,650. The average number of persons per household was calculated by dividing the Metropolitan Council's total population by the number of household. TABLE 2-2. PROJECTED SERVICE AREA POPULATION CITY OF CENTERV]LLEt Projected Projected Projected % of Projected Total Persons per Projected Total Population Service Area Year Households Household Population Served . Population 1 2000 1,000 3.1 3,050 89% 2,715 2005 1,200 2.9 3,500 93% 3,255 2010 1,400 2.8 3,950 95% 3,755 2015 1,575 2.7 4,300 97% 4,170 2020 1,750 2.7 4,650 99% 4,600 Source: Population and household data was interpolated from 1994 Metropolitan Council blueprint forecast data. The percentage of Centerville's population that will likely be served by City water in the future was determined by using the following assumptions: ■ All development in the City that is outside of the current MUSA boundary will be connected to the City's water system. • Service will eventually be extended to some presently developed areas within the current MUSA boundary, including Center Oaks, the Peltier Lake Hills additions, L'Allier Estates, and along Centerville Road between Westview Street and Center Street. CWP- 260A.080 2-2 260 - 080•25 Exhibit 2 -1, which was obtained from the City Planners, shows the present MUSA boundary within the City of Centerville, as well as staged future additions. Most population growth is expected to occur in the northern, central, and southern portions of Centerville, due to the access provided by proposed collector streets, while commercial and industrial growth is expected to occur in the eastern area of the City. Centerville's primary source of land use information is the current Growth Management Plan, which is shown in Exhibit 2 -2. • I I i CWP- 260A.080 2-3 260- 080 -25 CHAPTER 3 WATER USE 3.1 HISTORIC WATER USE. One of the most important aspects of any comprehensive water study is having a clear understanding of how a City's consumers use water. With this information and accurate records of past usage, projections can be made of future water demand. A course of action can then be developed to meet this demand. The City of Centerville maintains records of the annual volume of raw water pumped from its wells, as well as the volume of water sold to its customers. These records permit evaluation of all the components of water demand —the water used by residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional users. Table 3 -1 presents historic service area population and water use data for the past eight years. The service area population for 1996 includes the Centerville Elementary School population Of 900 students in addition to the City's residential and commercial water customer population. The inclusion of this population dramatically increases the average service area population for the last seven years. For the period from 1990 to 1996, the total water pumped on an annual basis has increased 289%. During the same time, the service population has also increased. Including the school population the service area population has increased 459% since 1990. Excluding the school population, the increase was 257%. It appears that the entire increase in water use is likely due to the increase in population. TABLE 3 HISTORIC POPULATION AND WATER SgRVICE INFORMATION at CITY OF CENTERVILLE Total Water Total Water Pumped Service Area Service Sold a) from Wells Year Population Connections (1,000 gal) (1,000 gal) 1989 N/A N/A N/A 11,005 1990 447 142 8,650 11,108 1991 567 181 10,115 13,560 1992 750 239 14,257 19,870 1993 788 252 16,358 17,130 1994 852 279 22,378 23,191 1995 932 301 21,852 22,150 CWP- 260A.080 3 -1 260-080-25 1996 2,050 (3 ' 323 32,055 32,075 Average 912 245 17,952 18,761 Average without 784 245 school 17,952 18,761 population (') Centerville's water system was put into operation in the fall of 1988. ct Water sold data was not available prior to 1990. (3) Service area population for 1996 includes Centerville Elementary School population of 900 students. Source: City pumping and billing records. 3.2 PER CAPITA WATER USE 1 The per capita water consumption rate is calculated by dividing the average daily residential water use by the number of residents, and is typically expressed as gallons per capita per day (GPCD). Because the 1996 servicejrea population included the Centerville Elementary School population bf 900 students, this made a significant difference in computing the per capita water. use. Values for residential per capita and total per capita water use were computed, and are included in Table 3.2 below. Including Centerville Elementary School population, the residential per capita water use has averaged 56 gallons per day over the past seven years. Without the school population( the average residential per capita water use has averaged 60 gallons per day for the same time period. Per capita water use based on total water pumped has averaged 64 gpcd including the 1996 school population and 69 gpcd without the school population over the last seven years. Although relatively low compared to other communities, these averages fall within the range of normally expected residential water use. TABLE 3 -2. WATER USE PER CAPITA CITY OF CENTERVILLE Service Residential Total Water Area Water Sold ( n Pumped Residential Total Year Population (1,000 gal) (1,000 gal) GPCD GPCD 1989 N/A N/A 11,005 N/A N/A 1990 447 8,650 11,108 53 68 1991 567 10,115 13,560 49 66 1992 750 14,177 19,870 52 73 1993 788 16,308 17,130 57 60 1994 852 22,314 23,191 72 75 1995 932 21,775 22,150 64 65 1996 2,050 m 31,875 32,075 43 43 Average 912 17,888 18,761 56 64 - cWP- 260A.080 3 -2 260 -080-25 Average without 1996 784 17,888 18,761 60 69 school population (1) Water use data was not available prior to 1990. w Service area population for 1996 includes the Centerville Elementary School population of 900 students. Source: City pumping and billing records. 3.3 WATER DEMAND BY CUSTOMER CATEGORY , Water billing records give breakdowns of annual water sales into totals for different consumer types such as residential, industrial, commercial, and institutional. Table 3 - shows total wale% use for the past seven years by type of customer. Water sales data was not available prior tq 1990, and there were no commerciaYindustrial useis in Centerville until 1992. Centerville Elementary School is the only institutional user in the Centerville water system. TABLE 3 -3. ANNUAL WATER USE BY CUSTOMER CATEGORY' CITY OF CENTERVILLE 1,000 Gallons Residential Commercial / Industrial / Total Year Water Sold Institutional Water Sold Water Sold 1990 8,650 0 8,650 1991 10,115 0 10,115 1992 14,177 80 14,257 1993 16,308 50 16,358 1994 22,314 64 22,378 1995 21,775 77 21,852 1996 31,875 180 32,055 Source: City water billing records. 3.4 LARGE VOLUME CUSTOMERS Large volume water users are defined as those individual customers who use more than 5% of the City's total water production. Based on 1996 billing data, there are no large volume customers in Centerville. 3.5 SEASONAL AND PEAK WATER DEMANDS January and July water pumpages are typically used to evaluate the relationship between winter and summer use, respectively. As can be seen in Table 3-4, which presents seasonal demands for 0 CWP- 260A.080 3 -3 260 -080-25 the past eight years, average winter and summer daily demands are approximately 36,500 gallop and 71,900 gallons, respectively! The unusually low July -to- January ratio of 0.52 in 1989 warrants an explanation. For the months of January through March of that year, City staff opened several hydrants in an attempt to maintain circulation throughout the system and avoid freezing the water tower. TABLE 3-4. JANUARY AND JULY WATER DEMANDS CITY OF CENTERVILLE Average Day Pumpage (Gallons) July to January Year January July Ratio 1989 75,561 39,555 0.52 1990 15,750 55,484 3.52 1991 23,613 52,645 2.23 1992 33,742 59,806 1.77 1993 36,710 52,839 1.44 1994 43,919 84,642 1.93 1995 50,387 59,387 1.18 1996 51,613 138,194 2.68 Average° 36,533 71,857 2.11 t ' 3 1989 was not included in the above average calculations. The demand imposed on a water system can be defined as the total water consumed by users of the system in a specified period of time. Typically, daily and hourly time periods are evaluated. Daily demands are usually evaluated on the basis of average day and peak day requirements. Table 3 -5 presents historic annual data for average day and peak day pumpage in Centerville. The data was obtained from City water pumpage records for the past seven years (1989 to 1996). The ratio of peak day to average day (peaking factor) varied from a Iow of 2.38 to a high of 6.74, and averaged 4.0 for the years 1989 to 1996. Excluding the unusually high years of 1989 and 1994 gives an average ratio of 3.37. Maximum day ratios greater than 3.00 are generally considered very high —ratios in the range of 2.50 to 3.00 are more typical. However, water use in small communities can be very erratic and it is not uncommon to find maximum day ratios over 3.00. Although all of the factors that contribute to such high consumption cannot be identified with absolute certainty, it is reasonable to expect that lawn sprinkling, watering of plantings and gardens, and car washing are the primary factors. On June 30, 1994, such factors were compounded by the draining of the water tower, which froze the previous winter, and resulted in the peak day pumpage of 428,000 gallons. In 1994, the next highest pumpage of 226,300 gallons occurred on June 27. Cwe- 260A.080 3-4 260-080-25 The occurrence of the peak day date in the winter months of 1989 can be explained by the hydrants being opened to prevent the tower from freezing, as explained in Section 3.5. In fact, the second highest pumpage of 108,480 gallons also occurred that winter on February 11. The third highest pumpage was 97,000 gallons and occurred on August 9. TABLE 3 -5. PEAK WATER CONSUMPTION CITY OF CENTERVILLE/ Peak Day 1 Gallons Peak Day to Year Date Peak Day Use Average Day Use Average Day Ratio 1989 Jan 6 151.5 30.2 5.03 1990 Aug 15 124.0 30.4 4.07 1991 Aug 16 106.5 37.2 2.87 1992 Jun 12 211.0 54.2 3.89 1993 May 21 111.5 46.9 2.38 1994 Jun 30 428.0 63.5 6.74 1995 Jun 21 240.0 60.7 3.95 r 1996 Jul 17 270.0 87.8 3 1 Average 1989 to 1996 205.3 51.4 4.00 Average without 1989 & 1994 177.2 52.9 3.37 3.6 UNACCOUNTED -FOR WATER USE As in all water systems, some of the water produced is never purchased by its customers. The unaccounted -for water use is estimated by comparing the average annual water production with the average annual metered consumption of a system. The difference between the two values is the unaccounted -for water use. Unaccounted -for water use can result from many factors. Some of the most prevalent factors include unidentified leaks in a pipe network, watermain breaks, periodic fire hydrant flushing, tank drainage for maintenance purposes, unauthorized use, unmetered services, and inaccurate meters. Unaccounted -for water use below 10% can be explained by normal system leakage and meter inaccuracies. Even the best of today's systems have these problems, and it is simply not cost - effective to try to eliminate all leakage. Meters that are 100% accurate do not exist. Table 3-6 gives a history of unaccounted -for water use in the City of Centerville between 490 and 1996. Over the past seven years, unaccounted -for water averaged approximately 12.2% of the total water pumpage. At this point, it is important to note that, in 1993, the City began to monitor the water it produced and sold to customers by computer. Prior to that time, such information was recorded by hand and in a much less accurate and efficient manner. It is felt that this change in process produced the dramatic reduction in unaccounted -for use between 1992 and CWP- 260A.080 3 -5 260 - 080 -25 1 1993, and that readings since that time provide a more accurate depiction of unaccounted -for use. Since 1993, unaccounted -for use has averaged 2.3 %. Unaccounted -for water use in 1996 wasr exceptionally low. This may have been a result of an estimated volume of water that was lost due to a watermain break. 1f this value was over - estimated, the value for unaccounted -for water use May be lower than it actually was. This data indicates that over 95% of the water pumped irk; Centerville is sold to customers. Unaccounted -for use of less than 10 % is considered acceptable by the American Water Works Association. TABLE 3 UNACCOUNTED - FOR WATER USE • CITY OF CENTERVII.LE 1,000 Gallons Unaccounted- % of Total Water Total Water Unaccounted- For Unaccounted - Year Sold Pumped For Water GPCD For Water 1990 8,650 11,108 2,458 15.1 22.1% 1991 10,115 13,560 3,445 16.7 25.4% 1992 14,257 19,870 5,613 20.5 28.3% 1993. 16,358 17,130 772 2.7 4.5% 1994 22,378 23,191 813 2.6 3.5% 1995 21,852 22,150 298 0.9 1.3% 1996 32,055 32,075 20 0.03 0.06% Average 1990 17,952 19,869 1,917 to 1996 8.4 12.2% Average 1993 23,161 23,637 476 1.6 2.3% to 1996 CWP- 260A.080 3 -6 260 -080-25 CHAPTER 6 ANALYSIS OF PRESENT AND FUTURE WATER SYSTEM NEEDS 6.1 GENERAL A water system is comprised of three major components— supply, storage and distribution. Each of these components must be adequate to meet the water demands placed on the system. This chapter analyzes each of the three components' capability of meeting the current and projected demands. Where the system is inadequate, new facilities have been recommended. 6.2 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE DEMAND Future water demand is based on residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional growth. This growth will depend on overall City growth with respect to population, industry, commerce and institutions, the spatial distribution of such growth according to land use planning, and the water consumption trends of different types of water users. In order to estimate future use, the following assumptions were used: 1 Centerville's population, in particular its service population, will continue to grow in accordance with the Metropolitan Council's projections as described in Chapter 2. 2. Using average data from the past seven years as a basis, residential per capita water use will remain at 60 gpcd. This assumes that any additional per capita water use that may occur because of new homes with automatic sprinklers will be offset by future water conservation measures. The peak to average day ratio will remain at 3.10. 3. The total number of industrially developed acres will increase from 7 acres to 63 acres by the year 2020. All industrial use will be that of a dry industry with per acre water use with a maximum of 1,000 gallons per acre per day (gpad). The peak to average ratio will remain constant at 2.25. 4. The total number of commercially developed acres will increase from 26 acres to 59 acres by the year 2020. All commercial use will have a maximum of approximately 1,000 gallons per acre per day (gpad) water use. The peak to average ratio will remain constant at 2.25. 5. Institutional water use will be only for the Centerville Elementary School. Based on 1995 data, water use will be approximately 6,250 gallons per day. It is assumed that this will remain constant through the year 2020. The peak to average day ratio will remain constant at an estimated 2.25. 6. Unaccounted -for water use will increase slightly from approximately 3.0 gpcd to 5.5 gpci by 2020. As Centerville's relatively new distribution system ages, it is reasonable tit expect a small increase in losses to occur, "priman'ly in the form of watermain leaks an& CWP- 260A.080 6-1 260- 080 -25 meter under - registration. The peak to average day ratio for unaccounted -for use will follow the same trend as that for residential water use, remaining at 3.10. 7. The ratio of peak hourly demand to peak daily demand will not exceed 2.0. This value has been experienced in similar communities in the Twin Cities metropolitan area and was used to predict future water demand. 8. The Insurance Services Office's existing fire flow requirements for Centerville of 1,000 gallons per minute for a period of four hours will not change. Tables 6 -1 through 6 -7 present the projected future water demands in the City of Centerville based on these assumptions. TABLE 6 -1. PROJECTED RESIDENTIAL WATER DEMANI CITY OF CENTERVILLE 1 Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Service Projected Average Day Peak to Maximum Total Area Residential Use Average Day Day Use Year Population Population GPCD "'" (MGD) Ratio (MGD) 2000 3,050 2,715 60.0 0.163 3.10 0.505 2005 3,500 3,255 60.0 0.195 3.10 0.605 2010 3,950 3,755 60.0 0.225 3.10 0.698 2015 4,300 4,170 60.0 0.250 3.10 0.775 2020 4,650 4,600 60.0 0.276 3.10 0.856 o» Per capita use projections are based on seven year average residential use of 60.0 GPCD. TABLE 6 -2. PROJECTED INDUSTRIAL WATER DEMAND CITY OF CENTERVILLE Projected Projected Total Projected Total Projected Average Day Projected Peak Maximum Industrial Industrial Use to Average Day Use Year Acreage GPAD (MGD) Day Ratio (MGD) 2000 63 1,000 0.063 2.25 0.142 2005 63 1,000 0.063 2.25 0.142 2010 63 1,000 0.063 2.25 0.142 2015 63 1,000 0.063 2.25 0.142 2020 63 1,000 0.063 2.25 0.142 CWP- 260A.080 6-2 260480.25 TABLE 6-3. PROJECTED COMMERCIAL WATER DEMAND CITY OF CENTERVILLE k Projected Projected Total Projected Total Projected Average Day Projected Peak Maximum Commercial Commercial Use to Average Day Use Year Acreage GPAD (MGD) Day Ratio (MGD) 2000 50 1,000 0.050 2.25 0.113 2005 59 I,000 0.059 2.25 0.133 2010 59 - 1,000 0.059 2.25 0.133 2015 59 1,000 0.059 2.25 0.133 2020 59 1,000 0.059 2.25 0.133 • TABLE 6 PROJECTED INSTITUTIONAL WATER DEMAND CITY OF CENTERVILLE • Projected Projected Projected Year Average Day Use 0) Peak to Average Day Maximum Day Use (MGD) Ratio (MGD) 2000 0.006 2.25 0.014 2005 0.006 2.25 0.014 2010 0.006 2.25 0.014 2015 0.006 2.25 0.014 2020 0.006 2.25 0.014 on Projections for institutional use are based on the 6,250 gal/day average use for Centerville Elementary School in 1995. TABLE 6 -5. PROJECTED UNACCOUNTED -FOR WATER DEMAND CITY OF CENTERVILLE Projected Projected Projected Projected Unaccounted- Average Day Projected Peak Maximum Service Area For Use to Average Day Use Year Population GPCD 0-W (MGD) Day Ratio (MGD) 2000 2,715 3.5 0.010 3.10 0.031 2005 3,255 4.0 0.013 3.10 0.040 2010 3,755 4.5 0.017 3.10 0.053 2015 4,170 5.0 0.021 3.10 0.065 2020 4,600 5.5 0.025 3.10 0.078 (0 Projections for unaccounted -for use are based on the assumption that unaccounted -for use will increase slightly as the City's distribution system ages. CWP- 260A.080 6-3 260 -080-25 TABLE 6 -6. PROJECTED AVERAGE DAY USE4 CITY OF CENTERVILLE I Projected Average Day Use (MGD) Year Residential Industrial Commercial Institutional Unaccounted -for Total 2000 0.163 0.063 0.050 0.006 0.010 0.292 2005 0.195 0.063 0.059 0.006 0.013 0.336 2010 0.225 0.063 0.059 0.006 0.017 0.370 2015 0.250 0.063 0.059 0.006 0.021 0.399 2020 0.276 0.063 0.059 0.006 0.025 0.429 TABLE 6-7. PROJECTED WELL FIRM CAPACITY CITY OF CENTERVILLE$ Projected Maximum Day Use (MGD) Year Residential Industrial Commercial Institutional Unaccounted -for Total 2000 0.505 0.142 0.113 0.014 0.031 0.805 2005 0.605 0.142 0.133 0.014 0.040 0.934 2010 0.698 0.142 0.133 0.014 0.053 1.040 2015 0.775 0.142 0.133 0.014 0.065 1.129 2020 0.856 0.I42 0.133 0.014 0.078 1.223 (') Well No. 3, with a pumping capacity of at Least 700 gpm, will be required before the year 2001. 6.3 WATER SUPPLY REQUIREMENTS The criterion used to determine the amount of required production is given in the American Water Works Association's Manual of Water Supply Practices. This criterion states that the pumping installation should be sized to provide maximum day demand with any one of the pumps, preferably the largest pump, out of service. This concept is commonly referred to as firm pumping capacity. Although a well pump failure on the maximum day is unlikely, there is a remote possibility that it could occur. Information on the existing wells and their locations has been presented in Chapter 4 - Existing Water System. The City's existing firm pumping capacity of 0.675 MGD is sufficient to meet thew current demands, but will be inadequate" by t`�ie year 2000/The firm capacity of 0.675 MGD is based on pumping 18 hours a day. Because of minimal demand during nighttime hours, the City's reservoirs will fill late at night and the wells will shut off until early morning. Therefore, 18 hours of pumping per day is the reasonable maximum time a well will operate. CWP- 260A.080 6-4 260-080 -25 As can be seen in Table 6-7, an additional well will be required between now and the year 2000 It was originally projected that a new well would be required in 1998 to meet increased water demand resulting from substantial industrial growth. Based on growth through 1997, it is not anticipated that the entire industrial area will be developed by the year 2000, as originally projected. The City will continue to monitor the growth in water demand to determine when an additional well is needed. The proposed new well will provide the City with sufficient film pumping capacity through the year 2020 when added to the system. It is proposed that the third well, Well No. 3, be located at the City Hall site. Other possible sites are City -owned property such as parks. Well No. 3 is proposed to withdraw water from the Jordan aquifer. 6.4 STORAGE CAPACITY Once the supply requirements have been established, that portion of the peak hourly demand which exceeds the supply capabilities (maximum daily demand) must come from equalization storage. In addition, the fire flow required must come from storage. The total storage capacity in a water distribution system should be capable of meeting both of the following criteria: a. Storage facilities should meet the peak hour flow rate minus the average hourly flow rate of the maximum day demand for a period of at least four hours. Peak hour demand should be met without depleting storage by more than half, so that a reserve is available for fue fighting purposes. (Data was not available to determine peak hour; therefore, a peak hour demand of 2.0 times the average hourly flow rate of the maximum day demand was used. This is a typical peak hour ratio for similar communities. Refer to Table 6 -7 for the projected maximum day demands.) b. Storage facilities should meet the requirements of independent insurance rating companies. (A commonly used insurance rating company is ISO Commercial Risk Services, Inc. ISO recommends that the City be capable of providing a 1,000 gpm fire flow for a minimum of four hours. The storage capacity should meet this fire demand without depleting storage by more than half, so that a reserve is available for meeting domestic demand.) The present and projected water storage requirements based on these criteria are presented in Table 6 -8. TABLE 6-8. PROJECTED WATER STORAGE,REQUIREMENTS CITY OntrITERVILLI , Insurance Rating Peak Hour Storage Storage Most Stringent Projected Total Requirements Requirements 0) Storage Criteria Storage Volume Year (gallons) (gallons) (gallons) (gallons) 2000 268,333 480,000 480,000 500,000 2005 311,333 480,000 480,000 500,000 CWP- 260A.080 6-5 260-080-25 2010 346,667 480,000 480,000 500,000 2015 376,333 480,000 480,000 500,000 2020 407,667 480,000 480,000 500,000 m Assumes that ISO fire flow requirement of 1,000 gpm for 4 hours does not change. A new 400,000 gallon tank is projected to be needed well before the year 2000, which is reflected in the projected total storage volume in Table 6 -8. By the summer of 1997, the peak hour storage requirements are anticipated to exceed the available 100,000 gallon storage capacity. Since the lead time for water towers is over 42 weeks, we recommend that the City proceed with construction of the proposed new tower. The City is considering the construction of a new tower and an interconnection with the City of Lino Lakes to augment its storage and fire fighting capacities. 6.5 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM The adequacy of a distribution system depends not only on the size of watermains but also on location and capacity of production, treatment, and storage facilities for the system. Watermain sizes are usually determined by fire demands, since fire demands result in much higher flows than other demands. Watermains must be sized to supply large demands locally and transfer water to areas more remote from supply and storage facilities. As Centerville grows, the maximum demands of the individual service areas will become more significant, relative to the fire demands. The Centerville water distribution system has been modeled with the CYBERNET computer model to aid in evaluating its current adequacy and to design future improvements. The evaluation of the existing watermain system was based on the American Water Works Association's Distribution Requirements for Fire Protection. The primary evaluation of watermain was made under peak hour demand conditions. The evaluation also included maximum day demand plus fire flow demand. In assessing model results, the predicted conditions for each individual watermain were evaluated in order to assess the performance of the watermain. The head loss per watermain was examined. The velocity predicted for each watermain and the head loss per 1,000 feet were also examined. Generally, watermains are considered potentially deficient, or most - limiting segments, if they are predicted to have any of the following conditions: • Velocities greater than 5 feet per second (ft/s), • Head losses greater than 10 ft/1,000 ft, or • Large- diameter pipes (16 inches or greater) having head losses greater than 3 ft/1000 ft. Watermains become limiting factors in delivering water at acceptable pressures to the extremities of the system when velocities approach 5 ft/s. As head losses in a watermain approach 10 ft/1,000 ft, a substantial loss of pressure occurs in that length of watermain. Watermains with head losses exceeding 10 ft/1,000 ft are generally a contr factor to inadequate system pressures. The ultimate test of water distribution system adequacy is the pressure at the point of delivery. CWP- 260A.080 6 -6 260 -080-25 6.6 PLANS TO EXPAND OR MODIFY THE WATER SYSTEM` The current water system is inadequate to meet current ISO storage requirements for fire flow and inadequate to meet 1998 peak hour fire flow requirements. An additional 400,000 gallons of storage will meet the City's ISO and peak hour storage requirements for the next 20 years. Additional storage is planned to be installed in 1998. Additional well capacity is needed to meet the projected demand. Since the City does not want to drill another well, the City is looking into redeveloping the existing wells to get additional firm pumping capacity. To be able to increase the firm pumping capacity, both wells will need to be redeveloped. It is estimated that Well No. 1 can be increased from 625 gpm to approximately 1000 gpm and Well No. 2 can be increased from 650 gpm to approximately 1000 gpm. After both wells have been redeveloped, the daily firm pumping capacity is anticipated to be 1.080 MGD. The projected maximum day demand in the year 2015 is 1.129 MGD. It should be noted that the 1.129 MGD is based on development of commercial and industrial development at 1,000 gpd. If the Commercial/industrial development does not require that kind of water demand, it is possible that the year 2015 maximum day demand will be less than the 1.080 MGD available after redeveloping Loth wells. The City will implement stricter water conservation measures in the future to reduce maximum day demands so that an additional well will not be necessary. Following is the City's proposed implementation schedule for the projected needed water system projects. Implementation Schedule: Item Puruose Pr jected Installation Year Redevelop Well No. 1 Provide 200 to 500 gpm 1998 to 1999 additional pump capacity Redevelop Well No. 2 Provide 200 to 500 1999 to 2000 additional firm pump capacity 400,000 gallon storage Meet projected storage 1997 to 1999 tank requirements CWP- 260A.080 6 -8 260-090-25 5. Any conditions at the site of which emergency staff should be aware? 6. Who else has been contacted regarding this emergency condition? Are these individuals taking any type of action (such as calling other communities or agencies)? 7. Are there currently any emergency personnel on site? 8. Any other critical information? 7.3 CURRENT WATER SOURCES AND SERVICE AREA Each of the water sources (wells) and the service area were described in detail in Chapter 4 and will not be reiterated here. Refer to Table 4-1 for information on the wells. 7.4 PROCEDURE FOR AUGMENTING WATER SUPPLIES Potential sources of water that can be used to augment or replace existing sources have been examined and are presented below. 7.4.1 Interconnect with Adjacent Communities There are currently no interconnections between Centerville and its adjacent communities. The closest water distribution system to Centerville is that of Lino Lakes. Presently, Lino Lakes is extending a trunk watermain west along Cedar Street to the intersection with 20th Avenue South and then continuing on to the south. Centerville is now in the preliminary stages of examining the feasibility of a possible interconnection with Lino Lakes along this extension. The City would like to have the interconnect line constructed in 1997, and on -line in 1998. Lino Lakes is furthermore in the process of designing a new 1 MG gallon elevated storage tank that will be located approximately 1,100 feet south and 1,300 feet east of the intersection of Interstate 35E and Main Street. The new tank, which will likely be placed into operation in 1998, will have an overflow elevation of roughly 1054.0, six feet higher than that of Centerville's elevated storage tank. Therefore, water from the Lino Lakes high level pressure zone would readily flow into the Centerville system simply by opening a valve between the two systems. The new Lino Lakes tank will be fed by two new wellhouses with pumping capacities of 800 gpm and 2,000 gpm. Both wells will be equipped with standby power, thereby greatly reducing the probability that a power outage will affect the reliability of the wells to provide water to the new elevated storage tank. The City of Centerville is still negotiating with the City of Lino Lakes to construct an emergency interconnect between the two communities. Such an interconnection would dramatically improve the Centerville and Lino Lakes water systems' ability to provide water during a power outage. CWP- 260A.080 7 -2 260-080-25 7.4.2 Conjunctive Use of Surface and Groundwaters There is one surface water source that was considered as a possible water source for the City— nearby Centerville Lake. Centerville Lake and Peltier Lake were created in 1912 with the construction of a dam by the Saint Paul Water Utility (SPWU), which owns the sole water rights to both lakes and much of the surrounding land. According to DNR Hydrologist Tom Hovey, these lakes are some of the best in Anoka County and would serve as a viable and sustainable source of water in an emergency situation. This is borne out by the fact that, prior to utilizing the Mississippi River as its primary source of raw water, they provided as much as 25 MGD, most recently during the drought of 1988. Mr. Jim Haugen of the SPWU indicated that, should the City of Centerville decide to pursue this option, the SPWU would probably be willing to enter into an agreement whereby the City could use these lakes as an emergency source of water. There is potential to use Centerville Lake as a surface water source in conjunction with the City's existing groundwater wells. However, considering the anticipated interconnection with Lino Lakes, along with the added costs associated with constructing surface water treatment facilities, Centerville would realize only small benefits in return for relatively large costs. 7.43 Alternative Sources of Water Prior to its connection with the City's water system, Centerville Elementary School operated its own water system, which included a private well with a capacity of 500 gpm. In accordance with MnDOH requirements, the school's well was disconnected from the school's system and is used for irrigation purposes only. Considering the age of the well (presumably drilled at the time of the school's construction in 1959) and the number of changes to MnDOH regulations over the years, it is difficult to know whether or not the school's well meets current standards. In all likelihood, it does not. However, given the following set of circumstances, the use of the school's well as an emergency source of water for Centerville's system would be possible: • The well itself would need to be brought into compliance with current MnDOH standards for municipal wells. This would include a detailed investigation of the site, well construction, and water quality. • The City would be required to obtain either ownership or control by easement of the area within a 50 -foot radius of the well. • Appropriate equipment modifications would have to be made, including the installation of a booster pump, shut -off valves, backflow prevention devices, and chemical feed apparatus. Again, considering the likelihood of an interconnection with the City of Lino Lakes and the degree of uncertainty of the effort and expense required to make use of the school's well possible, it is not recommended as an alternative water supply at this time. • CWP- 260A.080 7 -3 260 -080-25 washing, and waste disposal, and for on -farm livestock watering, excluding commercial livestock operations which use more than 10,000 gallons per day. Second Priority. Water uses involving consumption of less than 10,000 gallons per day. Third Priority. Agricultural irrigation and processing of agricultural products. Fourth Priority. Power production in excess of the use provided for in the contingency plan under first priority. Fifth Priority. Uses, other than agricultural irrigation, processing of agricultural products, and power production. Sixth Priority. Non - essential uses. These uses are defined by Minnesota Statutes 103G.291 as lawn sprinkling, vehicle washing, golf course and park irrigation, and other non- essential uses. Allocation procedures should distribute water equitably within each water use priority and customer category. Non - essential uses of water are the lowest use priority and will be the first water use subject to allocation restrictions. Quick responses to restrict non - essential uses of water during periods of limited supplies will help protect domestic and economic uses of water. Water used for human needs at hospitals, nursing homes, and similar types of facilities should be designated as high priority to be maintained in an emergency. Local water allocation will need to address water used for other human needs at other types of facilities such as hotels, office buildings, and manufacturing plants. Domestic use must have priority over economic needs. 7.7 TRIGGERS FOR IMPLEMENTING PLAN COMPONENTS An important part of reducing short -term demand is establishing triggers for implementing the various components of the plan. To establish triggers, the existing water sources were examined. The City is dependent on its wells as the water source to meet the water demand from its customers. The current average day demand is 87,900 gallons and - 4lte average peak day demand for the past eight years is approximately 2.3 times the current day demand, or 205,000 gallons. file 100,000 gallons of available storage capacity in the City's elevated storage tank can provide slightly more than a day of an average day demand and slightly less than a half day at peak day demand. Tower level is critical to maintain pressure in the distribution system. The most critical component of the Centerville system is the pumping capacity from its wells. For emergency conditions, the City should consider that the largest well pump is out of service. This is referred to as the firm capacity. Centerville's firm capacity is 550 gpm (0.675 MGD) with its largest well (650 gpm) out of service. Triggers for implementing plan components are based on firm capacity. CWP- 260A.080 7 -5 260-080 -25 • CHAPTER 8 WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 8.1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Water Conservation Plan is to provide the City with a procedure for optimizing the available water resources. Short -term water conservation can be accomplished by implementing the emergency procedures presented in Chapter 7. Long -term water conservation is an important part in managing available water resources. 8.2 ROLE OF CONSERVATION An effective conservation program will increase efficient water use, decrease water demand, and determine and address water loss and wasted water problems. By reducing total water use and increasing the efficiency of water use, a Water Utility can often postpone development of new sources, and decrease operations costs such as energy (pumping) and chemical costs. Since peak demands can affect energy costs and storage requirements, the ultimate goal will be to reduce peak water use. 8.3 WATER CONSERVATION POTENTIAL Each of the City's customer categories has been analyzed to determine the best potential for water conservation. During this analysis, it was determined that residential use accounts for 99.4% of the total, while commerciajindustrial /institutional use accounts for 0.6% of total use. These water use percentages have been fairly consistent since commercial/industrial use first occurred in Centerville in 1992. The residential customer category was selected as having the most potential for water conservation because of the total water volume used and the potential for reducing peak use. Another potential area for water conservation is unaccounted -for water use. Factors in unaccounted -for water use include watermain leaks, meter under - registration, unmetered connections, irrigation, watermain flushing and testing, and fire department use. The total potential for unaccounted -for water use conservation is dependent on where the water is going. For example, there typically is little potential to reduce fire department use. °Since Centerville's .. unaccounted -for use is approximately 2.3 %, there is minimal potential to reduce unaccounted -for use. It is anticipated that much of the potential growth in Centerville will be residential growth, and that many of these new customers will have automatic sprinkler systems. Per capita use typically increases as the number of automatic sprinkler systems increases. The City plans to implement future water conservation policies so as to counteract the potential per capital increase from more automatic sprinkler systems. It is the City's goal to maintain per capita water consumption at 60 gpcd and to maintain the ratio of peak day to average day demand at 3.10 over the next ten years. CWP- 260A.080 8 -1 260 -080 -25 Metropolitan Council 4',A0).' Working for the Region, Planning for the Futur 0 � � 9 February 12, 1997 A L C .. n � 'i� 1l, ^^ti�`s Jim March, Administrator K a ! t / ✓ / G G City of Centerville ,Ql c fr 1880 Main Street # Centerville, MN 55038 .4' RE: City of Centerville Comprehensive Plan Update 94Ae Metropolitan Council District No. 9 Metropolitan Council Referral No. 16466 -1 Dear Mr. March: The Metropolitan Council staff has completed an initial review of the city's comprehensive plan update which we received on January 30, 1997, and have determined that the proposed plan is incomplete for review. The proposed plan indicates that a local surface water management plan has been completed. However, it has not been submitted as a part of this plan update. The Metropolitan Land Planning Act indicates that a comprehensive plan include a water management plan. Your water management plan should be submitted to us for review and comment concurrently with its submittal to the Rice Creek Watershed District, prior to local adoption. The city should provide a final plan and a projected implementation timetable for land use controls that contain erosion and sedimentation control standards and shoreland management regulations. The city's draft water supply plan has been submitted to the Council for review. However, the plan is not complete for review and contains growth projections that conflict with those presented in the comprehensive plan update. You should submit additional information so that we can begin our review of this plan. Since you have submitted a complete comprehensive plan update, we cannot begin our review until we receive your water management plan and until we find your water supply plan adequate for review. Therefore, the 60 -day review period will not begin until this information has been supplied. If you have any questions about this matter, please contact, Victoria Boers, principal reviewer, at 291 -6621. Sincerely, Sf) -, Thomas C. McElveen, Deputy Director Housing., Development and Implementation c: David Hartley, Metropolitan Council District 9 Lynda Voge, Victoria Boers, James Larsen, Metropolitan Council Staff Richard Thompson, Anoka County Sector Representative 230 East Fifth Street 5t. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1634 (612) 291 -6359 Fax 291 -6550 TDD/TIY 291 -0904 Metro Info Line 229 -3780 An Equal Opportunity Employer LG220 For Board Use Only - Revue% Minnesota Lawful Gamblin Application for Authorization for an Fee Paid Exemption from Lawful Gambling License neck # Initals Date Recd Organization Information Organization Name Previous lawful gambling exemption number Church of St. Genevieve X 9 ? d c ? Street City State Zip Code County 7087 Goiffon Road Centerville MN 55038 Anoka Name of Chief Executive Officer of organization (CEO) Daytime Phone number of CEO First Name Last Name Rev. Richard J. Wolter (612 429 -7937 Name of Organization Treasurer y First Name Last Name Daytime Phone Number of Treasurer Diane Kieffer 612) 429 -5069 Type of Nonprofit Check the box below which best describes Check the box that indicates the type of proof attached to this application your organization by your organization: 0 IRS letter indicating income tax exempt status Fratemal Certificate of good standing from the Minnesota Secretary of State's office O Veterans ® Religious 0 A charter showing you're an affiliate of a parent nonprofit organization 0 Other nonprofit O Proof previously submitted and on file with the Gambling Control Board Gambling Premises Informatio Name of Establishment where gambling activity will be conducted Church of St. Genevieve Street City State Zip Code County 7087 Goiffon Road Centerville MN 55038 Anoka Date(s) of activity (for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing) May 21, 1997 Check the box or boxes which indicate the type of gambling activity your organization will be conducting [] 'Bingo i n Raffles O "Paddlewheels 0 *Pull -tabs 0 •Tipboards *Equipment for these activities must be obtained from a licensed distributor sure the Local Unit of Government and the CEO of your organization sign For Board Use Only e reverse side of this application. Date & Initials of Specialist Local Unit of Government Jurisdiction Is this gambling premises located within city limits?-71 Yes 0 No If Yes, write the name of the City: City Name Centerville If No, write the name of the County and the Township: County Name Township Name Check the appropriate status of the Township: 0 organized 0 unorganized 0 unincorporated 1. The city must sign this application if the gambling 3. DO NOT submit this application to the Gambling Control premises is within city limits. Board if it is denied by the local unit of government. 2. The county and township must sign this applica- 4. NOTE: A Township may not deny an application. tion if the gambling premises is not within city limits. Upon submission of this application to the Gambling Control Board, the exemption will be issued not more than 30 days (60 days for cities of the 1st class) from the date the local unit of government signed the application, provided the application is complete and all necessary information has been received, unless the local unit of government passes a resolution to specifically prohibit the activity. A copy of that resolution must be received by the Gambling Control Board within 30 days of the date filled in below. Cities of the first class have 60 days in which to disallow the activity. City or County Acknowledgment of Receipt of Township Acknowledgment of Awareness of Application Application Signature of person receiving application Signature of person acknowledging application Date Received: Date Signed: Title of person receiving application Title of person acknowledging application F m 4 ar I have read this application and all information is true, accurate and complete. -/ Date: February 12, 1997 Subhtit the application at least 45 days prior to your scheduled date of activity. Be sure to attach the $25 application fee and a copy of your proof of nonprofit status. Mail the complete application and attachments to: Gambling Control Board 1711 W. County Rd B Suite 300S Roseville, MN 55113 This publication will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, braille) upon request. Questions on this form should be directed to the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at (612)639 -4000. Hearing impaired individuals using a TDD may call the Minnesota Relay Service at 1- 800 -627 -3529 in the Greater Minnesota Area or 297 -5353 in the Metro Area. The information requested on this form will be used by the Gambling Control Board (GCB) to determine your compliance with Minnesota Statues and rules governing lawful gambling activities. All of the information that you supply on this form will become public information when received by the GCB. , LG220 For Board Use Only ' , Revosrss Minnesota Lawful Gambling Application for Authorization for an Fee Paid Exemption from Lawful Gambling License Check # Initals Date Recd Organization Information Organization Name Previous lawful gambling exemption number Church of St. Genevieve )( Ci 9 ?CO Street City State Zip \ Code d County 7087 Goiffon Road Centerville MN 55038 Anoka Name of Chief Executive Officer of organization (CEO) Daytime Phone number of CEO First Name ' Last Name Rev. Richard J. Wolter (61) 429 -7937 Name of Organization Treasurer Day time Phone Number of Treasurer First Name Last Name Diane 1 Kieffer (6l 429 -5069 Type of Nonprofit Organization Check the box below which best describes Check the box that indicates the type of proof attached to this application your organization by your organization: 0 Fraternal O IRS letter indicating income tax exempt status Q Veterans RI Certificate of good standing from the Minnesota Secretary of State's office _; Religious 0 A charter showing you're an affiliate of a parent nonprofit organization 0 Other nonprofit 0 Proof previously submitted and on file with the Gambling Control Board 1 Gambling Premises Information Name of Establishment where gambling activity will be conducted Church of St. Genevieve Street City State Zip Code County 7087 Goiffon Road Centerville MN 55038 Anoka Date(s) of activity (for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing) August 17, 1997 Check the box or boxes which indicate the type of gambling activity your organization will be conducting (J *Bingo Er Raffles C] *Paddlewheels ® *Pull-tabs ED *Tipboards *Equipment for these activities must be obtained from a licensed distributor e sure the Local Unit of Government and the CEO of your organization sign For Board Use Only e reverse side of this application. Date & Initials of Specialist Local Unit of Government Jurisdiction Is this gambling premises located within city limits?'" Yes IL71 No If Yes, write the name of the City: City Name Centerville If No, write the name of the County and the Township: County Name Township Name Check the appropriate status of the Township: [3 organized Q unorganized 0 unincorporated 1. The city must sign this application if the gambling 3. DO NOT submit this application to the Gambling Control premises is within city limits. Board if it is denied by the local unit of government. 2. The county and township must sign this applica- 4. NOTE: A Township may not deny an application. tion if the gambling premises is not within city limits. Upon submission of this application to the Gambling Control Board, the exemption will be issued not more than 30 days (60 days for cities of the 1st class) from the date the local unit of government signed the application, provided the application is complete and all necessary information has been received, unless the local unit of govemment passes a resolution to specifically prohibit the activity. A copy of that resolution must be received by the Gambling Control Board within 30 days of the date filled in below. Cities of the first class have 60 days in which to disallow the activity. City or County Acknowledgment of Receipt of Township Acknowledgment of Awareness of Application Application Signature of person receiving application Signature of person acknowledging application Date Received: Date Signed: Title of person receiving application Title of person acknowledging application Ft e t 'Q u 4 , ! C 'fi 1 have read this application and all information is true, accurate and complete. r . ' Date: February 12, 1997 E mit the application at least 45 days prior to your scheduled date of activity. Be sure to attach the $25 application fee and a copy of your proof of nonprofit status. Mail the complete application and attachments to: Gambling Control Board 1711 W. County Rd B Suite 300S Roseville, MN 55113 This publication will be made available in alternative format - (i.e. large print, braille) upon request. Questions on this form should be directed to the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at (612)639 - 4000. Hearing impaired individuals using a TDD may call the Minnesota Relay Service at 1 -800- 627 -3529 in the Greater Minnesota Area or 297 -5353 in the Metro Area. The information requested on this form will be used by the Gambling Control Board (GCB) to determine your compliance with Minnesota Statues and rules governing lawful gambling activities: All of the information that you supply on this form will become public information when received by the GCB. .. .. C 71'R A 36S: ; 15 1'FRIfiTY • .:DAC- �r5 55 SEEDING, MIX 1900 AC I 200.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 56 301) SY 600 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 T SCHEDULE 6.0 CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 —TOTAL 574.00 43,282.00 TOTAL AMOUNT THIS PERIOD 574.00 TOTAL AMOUNT TO DATE 577,876.24 DESCRIPTION TOTAL THIS PERIOD TOTAL TO DATE SCHEDULE 1,0 SANITARY SEWER- -TOTAL 30.00 564,103.00 SCHEDULE 2.0 WATERMAIN- -TOTAL $0.00 $48,722.00 SCHEDULE 3.0 STORM DRAINAGE- -TOTAL 30.00 367,399.00 SCHEDULE 4.0 STREET CONSTRUCTION - -TOTAL 30.00 3225,326.64 SCHEDULE 5.0 SITE WORK AND GRADING- -TOTAL 30.00 5129,043.60 SCHEDULE 6.0 CHANGE ORDER NO. 3- -TOTAL 3574.00 343,282.00 r cAi rius5 �rnn ASYI4kLTr# AMOUNT EARNED 5574.00 5577,876.24 AMOUNT RETAINED 50 00 315 000 00 MATERIAL ON SITE 30.00 50.00 MATERIAL DEDUCT, $000 $0.00 PREVIOUS PAYMENTS 3562,302.24 AMOUNT DUE 557400 3574.00 26004710.XLS Page 4 260-047 -30 CENTERVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY January 21,1997 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Centerville Economic Development Committee held their regular scheduled meeting on January 21, 1997. Chairperson Tim Rehbine called the meeting to order at 7:10 P.M. Present: Dan Tourville, Mary Capra, John Magill (7:15 P.M.), Paul Montain (8:15 P.M.), Theresa Brenner, Jim March. Approval of November 1996 Minutes Motion by Paul Montain, seconded by John Magill to approve the November 1996 meeting minutes. Dan Tourville - Abstain, Mary Capra - Abstain, Tim Rehbine - Aye. Approval of December 1996 Minutes Motion by Dan Tourville, seconded by Mary Capra to approve the December 1996 Minutes. John Magill - Abstain, Paul Montain - Abstain, Tim Rehbine - Aye. Star City Goals and Objectives Theresa Brenner stated that they need to update the goals & objectives. She would like to see a EDC member do -the updates. Dan Tourville suggested for Goal #2 Obj. #2 Task C to invite Dennis Zerwas to our next meeting to see if he would like to come out and talk about airing things over the Cable channel. Theresa Brenner will talk to Dennis and see if he will meet with staff. Jim March stated that their has been an increase in businesses calling into City Hall that are looking for new sites. He will be talking to the Council tomorrow night about types of incentives the city would be willing to offer. John Magill will try to get another business owner lined up for our next meeting. Dan Tourville suggested contacting Reel Mfg and see if the would be interested or Ken Strantz from Performance Auto. Floodplain Jim March stated the current building elevation for commercial sites is 1 foot above floodplain. Tim Rehbine thinks we need to clarify it if is determined by ordinance Jim March will check it out. MUSA /Comp Plan /City Water /Downtown Zoning The Comp Plan is going into review for the changes made on the growth management plan. The Council will be reviewing this issue tomorrow night. Dean Johnson stated the wording is already in the Comp Plan declaring the downtown area as mixed use. Jim March stated that Tim Yantos, the director of HRA for Anoka County, is looking into the future plans of Main Street. He will get back to Jim with his findings. Tim Rehbine feels that either the downtown property owners need to start the rehab or the City to offer some type of funding to get it going. The downtown area also needs parking. Dan Tourville would like to get feedback for the possible use of the MN Design Teams services. Tim Rehbine would like to start researching the costs & ideas of renovation and different funding options. Dan Tourville feels we need to find out what the County has proposed for the County Roads in the future before doing anything. Tim Rehbine would like to get somebody from the County to come and talk about the subject with the EDC Committee. It was decided to keep pursuing the county for more information. Senior Housing Theresa Brenner stated we need to find a site so we can start getting bids on the project to find out the feasibility of this project. The attorney is looking into what type of funds we can use to help pay for property. City Hall Sign We need to come up with something to help the problem of the track icing up. It was also discussed on coming up with another fundraising idea to help pay off the debt on the sign. Use of County Park Land No news to report, will keep pursuing information. Welcome Wagon This item will now be discussed under the Star City Goals & Objectives. Lino Interconnect Wa - Tow - The feasibility study will be reviewed by the City Council tomorrow night. There will be a meeting with some of the landowners for feedback tomorrow morning at City Hall. Election of a Chairperson Paul Montain nominated Tim Rehbine, Mary seconded it. Tim Rehbine accepted the position with John Magill being named Vice Chairperson. All in favor. Adjourn Motion by Paul Montain to adjourn the meeting at 9:41 P.M., second by Dan Tourville. All in Favor. Respectfully Submitted, Tamil 1,t, Danell Westbrock Deputy Clerk CENTERVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY February 18,1997 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Centerville Economic Development Committee held their regular scheduled meeting on February 18, 1997. Chairperson Tim Rehbine called the meeting to order at 7:15 P.M. Present: Dan Tourville, Mary Capra, John Magill, Theresa Brenner, Paul Montain (8:45 P.M.) Appearances Randy Hagerty appeared before the committee to discuss the City Wide Garage Sale Days event. He stated that this would be the 5th Annual and that each year it is continuing to crow. The event helps out the residents, businessowners, the environment, and the city as a whole._He would like to see the city present its self to be the best they can possibly be. Corner Express will be running old time train rides. He is still considering doing a classic car show, and Tom Thumb has shown interest in a promotion. He would like to see the City do another Open House or would appreciate any new ideas to keep this event growing each year. Another idea would be to do a silent auction at City Hall to raise money for the City Hall sign. Randy would need to know of any sponsors or events by April 23, 1997 for printing reasons. The event will be held May 16 & 17th. Money donations are used to help pay for special events. He would like to see the City get some recognition for this in bulletins and magazines such as the Mn Cities magazine or other travel type brochures. Approval of January 1997 Minutes Motion by John Magill to approve the January 1997 meeting minutes, second by Dan Tourville. All in favor. Star City Goals and Objectives Each member is to look over their goals and objectives and bring any changes our ideas to the net meeting. Goal 3 - Leave as is. Goal 4 - Leave as is. Paul Montain talked to the County Hwy Dept and stated the current plans are to do nothing in the next five years, but for the years 2002 - 2007 they have plans for major reconstruction of County Road 14 between 35W and 35E. We need to get some costs and ideas from such things as the Mn Design Team or Dean Johnson to improve the downtown area. Welcome Wagon - Mary Capra brought in sample cards to start as a test. Her idea is to start with charging each businessowner $ 75.00 for 50 homes. Do a follow -up with the residents and businessowners after to see if the program is worthwhile to continue. The cost would be approximately $.50 for each card and $1.00 would go to EDC for fundraising purposes. Dan Tourville suggested putting the cards inside a portfolio for handout. We should have an article in the newsletter for new residents that didn't receive their packet to call City Hall and then it can be delivered. John Magill suggested having this in place for the spring season. John Magill & Mary Capra will recruit businesses. Tim Rehbine & Danell Westbrock will work on compiling a list of new residents. Business Appreciation Dinner - The dinner will be held on May 20th. The site being considered is City Hall and having the food catered in. Theresa Brenner will check with Anoka County Commerce and see if they have a speaker available. Another idea is to have Tom Wilharber give a speech to the businessowners and / or Jim March. Theresa will check and see who is available. Tim Rehbine will check with Kelly's on the catering. Newsletter - EDC would like to have a businessowner recognized in the newsletters. They felt there should also be a recap of the happenings of the different committees for things they are working on or have accomplished in the last quarter. Floodplain Need Jim March to update the committee about what is exactly stated in the floodplain ordinance regarding building pad elevations. MUSA /Comp Plan /City Water /Downtown Zoning Regarding the memo from Met Council dated 2/12/97, Theresa stated that Dave Nyberg of MBA seems to have a handle on the situation. Motion by Mary Capra to have the City Council approve the expenditure to draw up a list of property owners and draft a letter to invite them to a public meeting regarding downtown development that would be headed by the EDC Committee. Approximate cost would be $ 500.00, second by Paul Montain. All in favor. Senior Housing Theresa Brenner stated they are looking at the Barrot property on Centerville Rd. but are still gathering more information on the location. City Hall Sign John Magill collected $ 300.00 towards the Winter Newsletter. John will be in charge of calling the businessowners and seeing if they want to remain in the newsletter and collect from them. Ry -chel Gaustad will be in charge of informing John of the deadline for ads and of any new subscribers for him to collect from. Tim Rehbine is waiting for bids to come in from a few carpenters for putting on the deck. Danell Westbrock will figure out the amount still owed on the sign. Use Of County Park Land Paul Montain stated the County is not interested in a joint venture. It would take a legislative act in order to do this. Doug Swenson was very much in support of this idea. He will keep in touch with him on this. Lino Interconnect / Water Tower Theresa Brenner stated that the City is going ahead with the interconnect and the city will be having a meeting with the property owners next week. Adjourn Motion by Paul Montain to adjourn the meeting at 10:25 P.M., second by John Magill. All in Favor. Respectfully Submitted, Danell Westbrock Deputy Clerk f CITY OF CENTERVILLE PARK AND RECREATION COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 5, 1997 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Park and Recreation Committee of the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on February 5, 1997. Meeting was called to order at 6:38 PM. Member present; Thompson, Navin, Johnson and Fogerty. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MOTION by Fogerty, seconded by Johnson to approve the January 8, 1997 Park and Recreation Minutes. Motion carried unanimously. A PEARANC'ES: Jim March, City Clerk/Administrator update: * LaMotte Park purchased for $118,511.84. Deed is in hand. * Audit of'95 indicated: Park fund at $64,862.00 City has received $32,000 form Willow Glen for first payment. March covered the plat drawing of Lakeland Hills of 12/26/96. Upon review of the plat it appears that it is in the best interest of the City of Centerville to accept park dedication fees in lieu of Land. MOTION by Johnson, seconded by Fogerty to accept park dedication fees for Lakeland Hills in lieu of land. Motion carried unanimously. March also distributed a summary of park dedication fees. (See attached). Discussion on development of Laurie LaMotte Park expansion. P &R will approach the City Council to seek authorization to expend funds to determine grading plan of intended park development. Possible development to occur in '97. Please place P &R on the Council agenda in up coming weeks, prior to end of February. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Laurie LaMotte Park - See above 2. 1997 Budget & 1996 withdrawn funds - Tabled until more information is available. r 3. Rink update - Number of people, time of operation, two hour limit - Navin will handle request of private parties. NEW BUSINESS: North Metro negotiations will be carried out by Rick Thompson and Nancy Johnson. Michael Navin has stepped down from that capacity. MARCH AGENDA: 1. LaMotte Park Discussion 2. North Metro Update 3. Budget Figures MOTION by Navin, seconded by Fogerty to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 8:30 PM. Respectfully, Michael Navin Vice Chairperson • • COUNTY OF ANOKA ` Office of the County Board of Commissioners GOVERNMENT CENTER 2100 3rd Avenue Anoka, Minnesota 55303 -2265 (612) 323 -5680 January 30, 1997 MARGARET LANGFELD County Board of Commissioners District 03 Jim March Clerk, City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 Dear Mr. March: Attached please find for your review a copy of a bill which Anoka County supports regarding county highway plat review authority. Senator Paula Hanson is considering carrying the bill but is concerned that cities in the area have an opportunity to respond to the proposal. Anoka County is currently informally reviewing the plats in question. This bill formalizes that authority. Please review the attached draft within the next two weeks and direct any comment to Maureen Gaalaas, Interim Public Information Manager, at 323 -5744. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, fri Margaret Langfeirl Anoka County Commissioner ML:si Attachment FAX: 323 -5682 Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer TDD/TTY: 323 -5289 F 4 1 A bill for an act 2 relating to Anoka county; requiring plat approval 3 before building permits in certain cases. 4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 5 Section 1. (PLAT APPROVAL BEFORE BUILDING PERMITS.) 6 Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law to the 7 contrary, in the county of Anoka each subdivision plat or 3 registered land survey plat which ie contiguous with any 9 existing or proposed county road must be approved by the Anoka 10 county board of commissioners before building permits are issued 11 by the municipalities in which the subdivision or land survey is 12 located. 13 Sec. 2. (LOCAL APPROVAL REQUIRED.) 14 Section 1 is effective the day after the chief clerical 15 officer of Anoka count complies with Minnesota Statutes, 16 section 645.021, subdivision 3. 1 CITY OF CENTERVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TUESDAY, JANUARY 7,1997 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Centerville held their regular meeting and a public hearing on Tuesday, January 7, 1997, at City Hall. Chairperson Tourville called the regular meeting to order at 7:05 PM. PRESENT: Chairperson Dan Tourville Kathy Welk Allan LaMotte Tina Vermeulen Linda Broussard - Vickers STAFF /CONSULTANTS: James March Ry -Chel Gaustad PUBLIC HEARING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:05 PM Tourville introduced Mr. Mike Black from Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. whom was proposing to have Lakeland Hills preliminary plan and rezoning approved. Mr. Black explained the Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. is proposing a 33.9 acres development "Lakeland Hills ". The minimum square feet per lot of 15,000 has been met. The average lot size is over 33,000 square feet. Mr. Black introduced Mr. Tim Kytonen the Registered Land Surveyor of Glenn Rehbein Companies. Mr. Kytonen will be working with Royal Oaks since they have done the majority of the plans and excavating for the previous land owner Rocky Goertz. Mr. Black explained RCWD is currently reviewing the wetlands and mitigation, some of the wetland impacts cannot be avoided. Mr. Black is proposing to run sanitary sewer and water off Centerville Road to the west then end on County Road 14. Black explained the City Engineer will have to address the pressure and the long extension of the watermain from the north. Mr. Black explained this will be a closed development but they will open lots to two or three builders. Although other builders will be involved, Royal Oaks will approve all building plans prior to building. The home values will be between $175,000 and $200,000 and perhaps higher by the creek or with a lake view. The Leroux property consist of 17 acres and the Hensel property about 17 acres. Tourville asked what will happen with the Hensel house? Mr. Black will move and remodel the exterior but currently Royal Oaks plans to leave it in the development. • Planning and Zoning Meeting January 7, 1997 Tourville asked if Royal Oaks was requesting a rezoning to R -2 Single Family? Mr. Black said yes. Tourville asked if there is a building spot on each lots including the smallest lot. Mr. Black said yes there is a building spot on each lot and 15,000 is the smallest lot. Tourville confirmed the three accesses; two off County Road 14 and one off Centerville Road. LaMotte asked what would happen with the shrubs and trees. Mr. Black said the majority of the shrubs and trees will remain. Royal Oaks felt preserving the atmosphere would lend to the development. LaMotte questioned if the swale will be left alone? Mr. Black said yes. LaMotte questioned the Centerville Elementary Schools drainage. Mr. Black mentioned a portion of the drainage will be flowing on Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10. Mr. Black has been in contact with the Bill Martin and Gary Korpella at the school and RCWD, Royal Oaks is happy to work with the school on the drainage issues. Although, the majority of the ponding is on the school property, Mr. Black was not sure if RCWD will allow ponding in wetlands. LaMotte suggested a fence along the pond area to keep kids out. Mr. Kytonen mentioned the ponds are very shallow. Mr. Black mentioned the lowest flood elevations will be two feet above the flood plain. Tourville asked about the trailway to the school? Mr. Black said there will be a 15 feet wide and 140 feet long right of trail way to the school. If the city would prefer something else Royal Oaks is happy to discuss it. Although, Mr. Behrind, Mr. Martin and Mr. Korpella from the school have seen the plans and were comfortable with the trail leading to the ballfields. Tourville asked if the school wasn't in favor of a through road. Mr. Black understood the school was not in favor of a through road. Whereas, the Fire and Police departments were in favor of the road going through. Mayor Wilharber commented the city could have the developers put in sidewalks. March commented sidewalks could be included in the developers agreement. Tourville asked what's to say other motorized vehicles or bikes from driving on the side walk. Mr. Bill Lalonde of 1687 Westview Street, felt it depends how the city address the sidewalks. Tim Schweppe of 7249 Centerville Road, questioned the distance between the development and the north side abutting properties. Mr. Black said it will be a minimal 30 feet but it could be 50 - 60 feet back. Mr. Schweppe asked about drainage? Mr. Kytonen said they could berm it and redirect the flow of water. Mr. Schweppe asked what will happen with the row of pines and the ones which run along the wetlands? Mr. Black said the trees will stay unless, the lot purchaser wishes to move their house in that area. Mr. Schweppe asked the proposed width of the road from Centerville Road since it was constructed at 34 feet? Mr. Kytonen said the width of the road will be 60 feet for right of way and a 34 feet road. 2 Planning and Zoning Meeting January 7, 1997 March mentioned the City Engineer has not submitted comments on this development. Tourville suggested Planning and Zoning have an opportunity to review the engineers comments prior to approval. Hatem Qamhieh of 7251 Clearwater Drive, questioned the water run off to the creek and requested directing the drainage to flow to the west away from the creek. Mr. Black explained the storm water system directs the water flow away from the creek but some water will flow into the creek. Mr. Qamhieh said there must be protection since the creek is eroding and wondered what there is for protection? Tourville asked if there is a sedation pond need? Mr. Black commented during construction the creek will be protected from sediment and erosion. Mr. Qamhieh mentioned several years ago the creek was about 7 feet wide now it is 15 feet wide, he felt it was due to run off from developments. Mr. Qamhieh suggested directing as much water to Centerville Lake instead of the creek. Bill Lalonde felt too much building is going on at least until the school, sewer and water towers catch up. Mr. Lalonde requested Planning and Zoning not put this before the council on January 8th. Mr. Lalonde said for the record "he is not in favor of this development although this is a nice development ". Mr. Lalonde was not in favor of any encroachment on the pines and rough trees on the property and suggested even the roughest trees be tapered off for protection. Mr. Lalonde recalled a Tahitian well on the west side of the property. Lots 8, 9, and 10 of block 3 will not be able to be filled? Mr. Lalonde is against allowing the city to accept park dedication fees in place of a park dedicated land. If the City is not able to maintain the park they should slow down on development. Mr. Lalonde feels the drainage should be addressed. Further, a minimal digging time should be implemented and if exceeded apply a penalty of $500.00 per day. Mr. Lalonde felt re- sodding instead of re- seeding and is for a moratorium. Bob Knobbie of 7241 Main Street questioned the drainage on Main Street since it appears the drainage is collecting on his property north of the proposed development. Mr. Knobbie suggested cleaning the culverts out so the water runs free and doesn't back up. Mr. Schweppe suggested placing the Hensel home in another area to avoid an eye sore. Mr. Black mentioned it is a very nice home and Royal Oaks would do what they can to match the Hensel house with the new homes. Tourville asked if the Police and Fire Department wanted Centerville Road to go through? Wilharber mentioned the police had no problem with the development, the Fire Department would like Centerville Road to go through. March mentioned l'vfilo Bennett would rather have Centerville Road go through but the proposed plan is okay. 3 Planning and Zoning Meeting January 7, 1997 Tourville mentioned if the City decides to go with a park the City will shy away from accepting wetlands. Mayor Wilharber mentioned maybe the city and the school can work together with the park area. Mr. Qamhieh asked where will the school expand? Mayor Wilharber mentioned the school has proposed an expansion within the center of the school, they are not expanding outside of the existing building walls. Broussard- Vickers asked if the Planning and Zoning postponed approval until another meeting what impact would it have on the development? Mr. Black would understand if the Planning and Zoning would like to table the preliminary plat then questioned the rezoning. Tourville explained its been the city's practice to approve the zoning upon final plat approval. Tourville asked if anyone had any further questions. MOTION by Vermeulen, seconded by Welk to continue the Public Hearing until February 3, 1997 to hear the comments from the City Engineer. Motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS: Automotive Driveline Service - Craig and Jim Kozar explained the operation of Automotive Driveline Service. Mr. Kozar explained the proposed building is 50 by 1000 feet. Mr. Jim Kozar asked where the watermain was located by their property. March commented an eight inch watermain is on the west side of 21st. Tourville questioned the parking area? Mr. Craig Kozar indicated they have 11 parking spots. Tourville asked if there was a need for semi - trailers to get in and turn around. Mr. Craig Kozar said no. Tourville questioned the future expandability? Mr. Craig Kozar had reserved about 80 feet to the west for future expansion. Tourville suggested speaking to Rehbien to correct the swale if needed. Tourville was concerned with the landscaping on the north side of the building. Mr. Craig Kozar was thinking of small bushes and trees on the north side of the building. Tourville said for the record "screening is not necessary between this building and Noble Welding ". MOTION by Broussard- Vickers, seconded by Vermeulen to recommend site plan to City Council with exception of screening on the south side, contingent of the engineers report bullet items 2, 3, 4 & 5. Motion carried unanimously. 4 Planning and Zoning Meeting January 7, 1997 Special Ilse Permit - Mr. Hank Moss requested a special use permit for advertising benches on the corners of Main Street and 20th and Main Street and Peterson Trail. Welk asked what purpose does this serve since there is no bus stop in either area. Vermeulen suggested placing a bench like this in the park area. Tourville said for snow maintenance, traffic, the land is not level and there is no purpose, Tourville wasn't in favor of granting a Special Use Permit. MOTION by Welk, seconded by LaMotte to deny the special use permit at the locations requested. Motion carried unanimously. 1997 Chairperson Position - Welk recommended Dan Tourville as Chairperson. Vermeulen recommended Kathy Welk as Vice - Chairperson. Both accepted. MOTION by Welk, seconded by Vermeulen to adjourn the Planning and Zoning Meeting. Meeting was adjourned at 9:47 PM. Respectfully Submitted, Ry -Chel Gaustad City Clerk 5