Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-02-24 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 1998 6:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call II. PUBLIC HEARING (S) III. APPEARANCES IV. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS 1. The City of Centerville February 11 - 24 V. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES 1. February 10, 1999 Council Meeting Minutes T - N V. SET AGENDA ? -Tt. z) WA— VI. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS VII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Drilling Special Use Permit 2. Update on Water Interconnect 3. Present Financial Reporting Options - Mari Nelson VIII. NEW BUSINESS 1. Insurance Renewal Items 2. Business /Citizen Person of the Year Criteria for Nomination 3. Consider the Purchase of a Podium - Cable Franchise Fees 4. Municipal Clerks and Finance Officers - Board of Directors . CONSENT AGENDA 9 Annual Step Increase - Grade 2, Step 3 - Receptionist (Jill Lien) based on Satisfactory Annual Performance Review \n -- 0 d dditeS S 4 C— r Lai ) 1\lt(S --- rc1'l1 � 2 D 2. Approval of the 1999 Commercial Rubbish Licenses XI. COMMITTEE REPORTS XII. ADMINISTRATORS REPORT XIII. ADJOURNMENT \\ v \ , .vJ Eeintr•c, panne. Auden% and Aaacciofet lac re ea APPeterr a Acton/Eye OpMnuni ' Employer pppp��ie�� rr nt Pnnclpaia: Oa• Banatroo, P.E. n Joseph C Andenik, P.E. n Mann: 1. Servers, PE ©ones `Cova Richard E Tart, P,E. t Glenn R Cook, P E. ;t Robert Q ScPurv6N, P.E. , Jer.y A. Boutetr,, P E. n Rosene Pcsb•n W. Rnen. P.E. end Sum, M. EWWIn, C.P.A . >snior Consultant. ALaatON* Prinelp$M Howard A Banked. P.P. n )(win A. Gordan, P E. n Robert A. FHNsee, P.E n A r „�� de M � ' M 1k ' & & Rkheed W. rant, P.E. n Oada O beret*, P E n P,bsn C Ratang, A.I.A it Mark A. h ns aon, D.E. n I1 mahaii T . Reulthara RE, n Ted S. Floe C.E. n Kennetn P Anderinn, P.E I; Mari R Rofs, F g Sldray P. Wellereson, P E.. c.B. 11 Rene Ran F. Kawritn 11 Agnes M Ring 0 Mchael P. Pa¢ P E Associates . tt V VVV \ pu.n Rick Schnuck. P.E. Mot Sk. Peet Rochester. Wenner er and 51 Clael. MN n Mliweekae. WI Engineers & Architects WEEK IN REVIEW ENGINEERING ISSUES CITY OF CENTERVILL.E February 8, 1999 to February 19, 1999 BRA File No, 616 -GEN PROJECTS IN CONSTRUCTION SCHOOL CROSSING AHEAD —FLASHER SYSTEM ON CSAIT 14 • The lights were programmed and became operational on February 5, '1999. PROJECTS IN DESIGN WATER INTERCONNECT • A meeting was held on February 16 with City Staff and Lino Lakes engineer John Powell. Details were worked out regarding the proposed connection to Lino Lakes water system. A revised cost estimate will be presented at the February 24 " Council meeting. APPLE TREE SQUARE • Revised plans are being reviewed for compliance to City Standards. MET COUNCIL SANITARY INTERCEPTOR • Preliminary plans of this proposed project were submitted and reviowcd. Comments were sent back to MCES. Construction is expected to begin in September 1999, 2335 West Highway 38 n St. Paul, MN 3511311 851- 835.4600II Fax: 651.536 -1311 MEMO DATE : February 19, 1999 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM : Jim March RE : Special Use Permit - Lloyd Drilling ********************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Included in your packet is a revised special use permit in regards to the above mentioned project. I have revised the special use permit to include the asphalt trail, lighting to be directed away from adjoining properties, fence in rear and site access as proposed (one access off of Peterson Trail, one access off of Main Street). I have spoke to Mr. Drilling in regards to the design changes being made to the front of the building. He indicated that his architect is making the noted changes to the front of the building. He thought he would have colored renditions available for display at the meeting next week. If you have any questions on this issue, please contact me. • CITY OF CENTERVILLE COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA SPECIAL USE PERMIT This Special Use Permit is granted by the City of Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota this 10th day of February, 1999. WHEREAS, Lloyd Drilling ( "Permittee ") has applied for a Special Use Permit to construct and lease an approximate 5200 square foot commercial daycare center and an approximate 7200 square foot retail center, 1845 Main Street within the City of Centerville, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, such Special Use Permit is required by Zoning Ordinance #4, Commercial District; and WHEREAS, after review the City Council has approved the granting of such Special Use Permit subject to the following conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows: 1. That Lloyd Drilling, shall be granted a Special Use Permit to construct and lease an approximate 5200 square foot commercial daycare center and an approximate 7200 square foot retail center, 1845 Main Street, Centerville, Minnesota. 2. That this Special Use Permit is conditioned upon the following: (a) Applicant obtains a Rice Creek Watershed District Permit 4 _ .. ' .. • _ • • 1 . '1 .1 : 1 / , . • 1% • .. / ... Access Permit or - 1 1 1 . y - 1 • 1 - - 1 - 1 • : 1 1 . 1 . • - 1 1 Council (one access on Main Street and one on Peterson Trail (c) 4..' . _ t •1 .'1 . . • 1 .11 666.• - 1 11 1 /.. ._11 lot design site drainage and adi g plan wi need to he roved by the City F,ngineer (d) Applicant will construct an 8' wooden fence on the north side of the retail center to provide a screen for the residential area Chain link fencing is allowable for the child care center (e) .. •_t .9 -- t. , I 'll A 9'1 - - 1 . . 1611 adjacent properties, an asphalt trail will he constructed across the south edge of the property and that alterations will be made to the ro_tpinall • - c- •f<,•- •H...- •- •_'• -• ••,••- historically appropriate 3. In the event that Permittee fails to comply with any of the terms and conditions set forth herein or ordinances, or rules and regulations of the State of Minnesota, County of Anoka, City of Centerville or any other governmental agency having jurisdiction over this project, the City Council shall have the right to immediately revoke the Special Use Permit. Any and all costs incurred by the City in the event of default by Permittee in any of the terms, conditions, ordinances or rules and regulations as provided above shall be the responsibility of the Permittee. 4. This Special Use Permit shall be subject to annual review by the City of Centerville. In the event the activities conducted on such property are injurious to the public health, safety and welfare, the City Council may impose additional restrictions in this Special Use Permit or revoke same. All conditions heretofore and hereinafter contained in this Special Use Permit shall be binding upon any and all officers and managing agents of the Permittee, and any of their heirs, transferees or assignees, CITY OF CENTERVILLE Mayor Dated Clerk/Administrator Dated PERMITTEE Lloyd Drilling Dated DATE: February 19, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk RE: Update on Water Interconnect On Tuesday, February 16, 1999 a meeting was held with the Staff from Lino Lakes, Bonestroo and Centerville to discuss the water interconnect. Currently, City Engineer Tom Peterson is creating a revised cost estimate and plans to have it available at the Council meeting. DATE: February 19, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk RE: Present Financial Reporting Options - Mari Nelson Councilmember Nelson will provide financial reporting options to the Council. Information will be distributed during the council meeting. Do not hesitate to contact Councilmember Nelson or Teresa Bender with concern or questions. ❑ Points would be earned from the actual voting process. This process would be done by a ranking system. If you have five nominees you would rank them from 1 -5 with 5 being the top score. The number of nominees would determine the number of points used for this process. The ranking system would make certain that everyone has a vote. Example: Nominees Highest Ranking Possible 5 Jane Doe 4 points John Jones 3 points Sam Sails 1 points Fran Fan 2 points Ted Red 5 points The ballots would be totaled: Example: Jane Doe Ballot votes 60 points Johns Jones Ballot votes 40 points Sam Sails Ballot votes 100 points Fran Fan Ballot votes 85 points Ted Red Ballot votes 123 points The nominee receiving the most votes would be awarded the award. We would also like to see recognition certificates presented to the next two highest vote recipients. We would like to see all nominees publicly recognized and thanked. Whether that be through a council meeting, article in city newsletter or article in local newspapers. Some EDC members feel the losers may not want to be recognized so publicly. Another option may be to do a letter of recognition signed by all City Council members and leave it at that. This process we feel would be a better system and would give residents and business credit for what they have accomplished as well as increasing the voting process with more voters involved. In the event of a tie we believe it would be better to give out two awards rather than try to break a tie by a draw or other means. Citizen and Business Person of the Year Criteria for nomination The following is the EDC report to the City Council on the nomination criteria for the Citizen and Business Person of the Year. ❑ Citizen of the Year- This person would need to be a resident of the city within the calendar year of nomination. ❑ Business Person of the Year- Would not have to be a resident of Centerville, but would need to be business owner conducting business within the city during the calendar year of nomination. ❑ The Citizen or Business Person being nominated should be nominated for volunteer efforts or accomplishments that they have made to the city for the calendar year that the nomination is for. The lifetime achievement award may better honor nominations for things done years before. ❑ We would like to see the voting for these honors done by all City Staff and City Committees, i.e. Planning and Zoning, Economic Development, Parks and Recreation. This would open the voting to 30 or more votes making it a better across the board ratio than having just one committee responsible for the vote. ❑ The actual voting process would take place by paper ballot that would be placed in sealed envelopes and tabulated by the EDC or City Staff. The ballots would be numbered in order to keep track as to which ballots have been returned or as indication of voting, if needed. If an individual voting serves on more than one committee or is on a committee and a staff member they would be allowed only one ballot for voting. ❑ If a member of any of the city committees or city staff were nominated for an award they would be removed from voting for that award. For example if Ted Red was nominated for Business Person of the Year and he also served on the Planning and Zoning Board he would be removed from voting for Business Person of the Year, but would be included in the voting of Citizen of the Year. This would be beneficial in avoiding any conflict of interest regarding the voting. ❑ We also believe that no one should be excluded from the process if they have received the award in the past. An example would be that if Ted Red won Citizen of the Year in 1997 and was nominated again in 1998 they should still be considered for the 1998 award. Presenting of the Awards Business Person of the Year: We would like to see the Business Person of the Year presented his or her award in May during the Business Appreciation Dinner sponsored by the EDC. Citizen of the Year: We are open to suggestions for the presenting of this award. We felt it would be nice to see this award presented at a Council Meeting in the beginning of the year, with additional recognition during the Fete De Lac City Celebration. Tim Rehbine would suggest that the citizen of the year be presented at the Business Appreciation Dinner along with the Business Person of Year with additional recognition during the Fete De Lac city celebration. The attached is an example of the revised nomination form that we would like to have in place for this year's nomination. We would also like to take the nominations for 1998 and conduct a revote based on the new voting process. City of Centerville Citizen of the Year Nomination Form Name of Nominee: Phone: Address: Please check and write in the name of organizations, groups, and committees in which the nominee is actively involved i.e., city council, parks & recreation, planning & zoning, EDC, Centerville Lions, Centerville Parents Association, Boy & Girl Scouts, Church committees, School involvement etc. Use "Other" for any not listed. ❑ City of Centerville Committee: ❑ Local Organization: ❑ Local Organization: ❑ School: ❑ Church: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: Please list below the tasks that the nominee has accomplished during this past year that have been of benefit to Centerville and its residents: Are there any other factors you feel may be important to consider regarding this nominee Nominated by Date Address: Phone: City of Centerville Business Person of the Year Nomination Form Name of Nominee: Phone: Address: Please check and write in the name of organizations, groups, and committees in which the nominee is actively involved i.e., city council, parks & recreation, planning & zoning, EDC, Centerville Lions, Centerville Parents Association, Boy & Girl Scouts, Church committees, School involvement etc. Use "Other" for any not listed. ❑ City of Centerville Committee: ❑ Local Organization: ❑ Local Organization: ❑ School: ❑ Church: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: Please list below the tasks that the nominee has accomplished during this past year that have been of benefit to Centerville and its residents: • Are there any other factors you feel may be important to consider regarding this nominee Nominated by Date Address: Phone: a MEMORANDUM DATE: February 18, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk RE: Consider the Purchase of a Podium - Cable Franchise Fees It has come to Staff's attention that a podium in the Council chambers may benefit the meetings efficiency and enhance the professional atmosphere. If the Council elects to authorize the purchase of a podium, I recommend using franchise funds. In March, the City will receive 1998 Cable Franchise funds of approximately $3,250. This should not be confused with the cable excess funds that will be returned to member Cities. The following are some purchasing options: 1. Purchase a Podium from a business supply house $200.00 - $2,000 (See attached). 2. Request Public Works construct a podium - $200.00 materials/labor. 3, Hire a local woodworker to construct the podium. 4. Request the council table maker to construct a podium to match the Council table. The following are possible components: 1. A Microphone 2. Stationary or with wheels 3. Color 4. Design Please contact me at City Hall with questions or if you need additional information. g Room Lectern .., ee not indudetl. - #L % I 1 • ` 77: " f ^r+'il . k r i e. ., ' : 'Elli • ' � )��� i S r 1 `a J.� • • L.. L. yN M k � :aInu� i a+ 0 yy iP w 1 ��Ii In J , . ® � ( ' :.1 j j1j1( Lif � k I `ry s L.r ri � ��d l r � ( C J 9 j Oak t I 6E '�I� j9 y � Legs re tract and u nit carries � . � ( � tiff a s Bas il 1 1 : ! E ( y as lugg 1 Mobile P /AV cart. Lectern p Lectern Base/AV with the Vertfflex 111,,,......J .1.... /I - , +, Six built-in speakers :::,_,... I Use the Tableto alone or to an audience of 300g / ` r ly I : - ❑ p UPS • Slanted too c ' — ) 1 _ ;'- r th r \, .'' rt ' ('. `' '' A One -P iet ce storaoe 1 VRT - 50 0 51 ��t VRT -50052 r�t:T ^- / {/4X• Microphone RT -50265 © Sound Column Stand clrpsto lapel or bloase. EVdth AMPL/ - VOX CORDLESS Six- speaker column for audiences ectern— PUBLIC ADDRESS Elegant h igh - pressure la up to 3000. © Wireless Microphone Kit— a Tabletop L DRESS LECTERNS casters.21w 15d urinate. Concealed Amph -Vox sound systems to Convert all mobile base b- •for indoor or outdoors • APL - 5500 -OK Oak 4 6h. S hpg. to 9316x operated transmitter, re • Powerful r speech amplification 2'hwx'hd receiver and 1 Sr Wmu ltimediareadya mp APL- 5500VV Mahogany x4h a wl re ess. Ba ne me 20d x 3sl:h, tape ik . VRT -50058 I with stereo input for tour APL - 5500 -WT W APL-51600.................................... - 3 mks, outputs for tape purer /CD, tape and Walnut to th st e • Pe /CD, tape Each .................................................. . Wireless - 2 speakers 8 III f ess N a Each 8279 0 0 VR 50 � 66 _ reel ndheld Microphone— Each • Professional handheld 0 Roving Rostr um — Luggag e audience. State the ar room t o four cord an mike with opens to become a sound s9 ste style case art electronics ik r e ceiver 50266 Two lo Mobile Le and mike holder audiences up system lectern for consistent signal of unidirectional mike with an AV cart or • All units 2n on ?0 pba(teries (not 40 j fte speak t 100 Twc 6 x 9 s 3 00 -ft, range. . or convert to a rechargeable Retractable l eg seg ack. sold wit kgpL ?quires wireless mike recei ACcharger/adapter exfbfsystem— 76 /'wx 9 ak 17h. Sh 51600. shelf. 21' /ewx 1 (sold separately) APL- 5122- BK........ P9 wt 2015x. APL- 57605 ................................. VRT -50060 P Sound System is • -.Each 8599.00 Each 5299.00 VRT -50061 V For audiences up Tabletop Lectern— AMPLI LECTERN ACCESSORIES VRT -50267 A with cloth grille P to 1000. Woodgrain melamine O base � piD fl Each AV cart 24w to lO cover. Shown on Ve melamine Includes er n Lamp C ulb. 8 -ft. card. 8w llp.on brass base. ENTA71l eJe APE-5250-0K x 14h. ShP9 wt 49 16x. APL - 57100- .... .b PRESI ENTIA APL_ Medium Oak GD ............................ Each 84 9,00 P ublic Address 5250 -WT Walnut Portable Each.................................................... © Lapel Micro 0 ia signal cardioid m ike h 40 e -- W Ireless Rich look for for board rooms. C 0 Handsfree profes- Lightweight, yet System mine laminate v Verfiffex 8599.00 cord, 12 -ft, extension with 7 { Y Powerful PA base broadcasts Cart_ M Obrie Lectern cable for wireless or condenser all watts of audio 0 Pre 4 Two 6h. i Use as an AV cart or Base/AV APL - 52030..................................... nserm2 -ft attaches the wireless transmitter to Speaker and Tabletop Lectern. 3 /a" as base for . Baker Casters Four lamin thermofused ©qC Adapter/Battery Each 849,Op clip-on microphone to jacket, belt for easy mobilit shelf. laminate Two locking casters and concealed melamine Ater /Battery Rechargers— complete freedom of movement L shirt or blouse for Paper stop. x 20d x 33'/<h. Sh cealed Converts Ac charge NiCad batteries. 9 -ft. cord. into standard C wer plugs d by runs x 20' /.d x 46h. Si lamin 060 P9 wt. 5915x. 50/60 Hz, 110220 universal cord. batteries (sold separately) VRT -50061 Medium Oak APL-S1450 standard socket. Trans VRT -50243 50090 M Each.........., Walnut 15 volt......, 9-volt battery Transmitter 4lbs •RT - N APL - 51460 "" 599.00 0 (included). Weighs only 54 s. Each 18 volt ..................... 89.00 APO- PA5000.. .......... ................. ............ ....................Each 5422.50 .8173.00 MEETING ACCESSORIES 199, 283 THESE MANUFACTURER LIST PRICES ARE SUBJECT TO CH f �• CHANGE All Items U 1 • This symbol denotes items that ia f CALL US FOR CUR: cannot ship v •This symbol dent Meeting Room e s1 I' " '°r '"" q ' lack st q 1 1 ' '''' d ) ' • 1 I ti' { ' l , �1 rh 1 I 1 I ;:- sat �" t / Walnut Medium 0ak 1 r (� , 1 >Yra. 4 it 0 I VERI irL =X LECTERNS ' Sr ed top with paper ledge to hold notes. b 1 r . frr- c.`cd melamine . '� 0 One -Piece se Stan lamin ate L ectern —Con- 1 j. ` '. �� . tal rg s;crcae shelf. With flo glides 23w x - I. fr Lectern base doubles • as ..c e2 L t SI 5' =h Snp wt. 68165. A 4 „ an AV Cart - / ; �' - a o any' *' t ._ $ S0051 =c u^" Oak L .^-°- - - i •. - 1G YuCi2 : - - _: -Z Y � rite for mo e r—, jy1=' VC -50265 Manocany ' c ' 1 ro— 3198.75 -Hmo — ® - ,3 Janet or blast - - rYil;n. N _ - ,. Tabletop Lectern —Use alone or with the e Kit —Cot" $ t 1e6te base below for a 45 "h lectern 24w x ' r. ,' ' 413Wh, Shpg. wt. 30 lbs. _� to •:nreless. •.: Medium Oak yt _ t 1� l r t • �s Ive• and la c •. 9 Walnut 1 a t - - .o�� - - n Mahogany — • ! �__ '_'� .Eac�R _ 4112.25 I id ylrcroR • • Lectern 8a /AV Cart—Use as I w 1 r n.^ . On or as bas.- ;I 1 1wo locking c.: and concealed r �% G T x '7 d z33 ch Shpg. wt. 591bs € 9 w m ike - • Medium Oak - i _. snr - e Walnut - . ? Cad' _ • -. Mahogany ', 5173 00 . 1 SERIES LECTERNS ..I - - ' fags meetings, conferences and - G®- - r - 1 • anti, e t' hermo(used meta ■ m .'. e " Standup C fi' - '� `f „ rn with - hdde n - c - a 0 qv �� sun tcp :nth generous c -': „ - storagesnelves. 25'/w 't�. 5 � ,a WL 105 Its. Presidential Instructor Stand— © Hospitality Service to Cart—Fold -away 56 .c;: Versatile mobile stand can be used as AV cart, expand serving area S ' h ” wide. Deep out S a ra _ Oak Black Trim . ...._5417.00 beverage cart or for storage and distribution of drawer and locking cabinet for storage. Four f . meeting materials. Removable shelf inside lock- �ra . k .,. War _ T mg double doors. Four casters (two locking). Shpg . wt. 1281bs. 29 x 20'hd x 41 h. Shpg. wt 124 Ibs. •VRT -50246 Medium Oak ♦VRT -50245 Medium Oak •VRT -50075 Mahogany/Black • require assemhl ♦VRT -50084 Mahogany /Black Trim Each 3425.00 t. . Pat ca � sa reor ;eio ore ups Each 3367.00 casters, two locking. 32'hw x 201/4d x 38'/.h. EASEL PADS 754 a'r MEMORANDUM DATE: February 18, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk RE: Municipal Clerks and Finance Officers - Board of Directors I have been the Region IV vice- president for Municipal Clerks and Finance Officers Association (MCFOA) for the past three years. It is my hope to continue in my efforts to bring recognition to the City of Centerville while assisting and partaking in professional development and networking opportunities. Council approval is required in order for me to continue involvement as an Officer. Also, it is my desire to pursue the office of Treasurer if the opportunity presents itself. Thank you in advance for your consideration of my request to continue as an MCFOA Officer. Do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or for further information. Thank you. MEMO DATE : February 19, 1999 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM : Jim March RE : Step Increase for Jill Lien ********************** * * * * * * * * ** * * * **** ** * ** * * * * * * * ** Jill Lien has been employed with the City for a period of two years. I have provided Jill Lien with her written annual performance appraisal. Based on the satisfactory review, I would recommend a step increase per the compensation study. The one -step increase would be to Grade 2, Step 3. MEMO DATE : February 19, 1999 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM : Jim March RE Insurance Renewal Issues ********************** * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** There are two issues that the Council must address during this annual insurance renewal process. The first item is whether the Council wishes to waive the statutory municipal tort liability limits. Included in your packet is some information from the League of MN Cities that explains the City options in regards to this matter. In speaking to Gordy Beulke (Beulke Insurance Agency), I do not believe this would be in the City's best interest. Mr. Hoeft can also address this issue at the meeting. The second issue is whether the City would like to extend workers compensation coverage to the Council and respective Committees. If the City would like to add this coverage, the coverage should be added by Ordinance. This item is fully discussed in the enclosed memo from the League. Depending upon the Council's decision, the appropriate Ordinance would be drafted for the next meeting. e v ] 145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55103 -2044 League of Minnesota Cities Phone: (612) 281 -1200 • (800) 925 -1122 Cities promoting aaronance Fax: (612) 281 -1299 • TDD (612) 281 -1290 LIABILITY COVERAGE LIMITS - CITY OPTIONS Effective January 1, 1998, the statutory municipal tort liability limits increased to $300,000 per claimant, $750,000 per occurrence. Partly to reflect that change, the LMCIT liability coverage has been restructured in some important ways. All LMCIT coverage written or renewed after November 15, 1997, will be issued with a $750,000 per occurrence limit. Unlike the previous current coverage form, under the new coverage form the statutory per - claimant liability limit will not automatically be waived. However, the city has the option to waive the per - claimant limit if you choose. The revised limits structure and the waiver /non - waiver option are explained in more detail below. Coverage limits and liability limits For many years, LMCIT liability coverage has been written with a combined single limit of $600,000 per occurrence. (There are also some sub - limits and/or aggregate limits on coverage for certain exposures.) The coverage document has also explicitly provided that the statutory per - claimant limit of $200,000 was waived. As a result, the city had $600,000 of coverage limits available per occurrence; and an individual claimant could potentially recover up to $600,000 for his/her injuries, notwithstanding the $200,000 per claimant statutory limit. The revised liability coverage differs in two important ways: • It carries a limit of $750,000 per occurrence to match the statute; and • The per - claimant statutory liability limit will no longer be automatically waived. The result is that the city will have $750,000 of coverage limits available for most claims. But on those claims to whichlhe statutory_limits.apply, the city and LMCIT will be able to use the statutory tort liability limit to limit an individual claimant's recovery to no more than $300,000. Of course, there are some claims to which the statutory liability limits don't apply. A federal civil right claim is one likely example. For these claims, there is no monetary limit on what the individual claimant can recover from the city. On these claims, the city has $750,000 of coverage limits available, regardless of whether there's one claimant or several. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER The LMCIT Board decided to restructure the liability coverage in this way for two reasons: First, it lets a city to take advantage of all of the defenses and protections that the legislature has provided. Second, the projected savings from being able to apply the $300,000 per claimant statutory limit will roughly offset the projected increased cost for the higher per - occurrence limit. The city's option to waive the statutory limits The statutory liability limit only comes into play if somebody has been injured by the city's negligence, and has proved to the court that his/her actual injuries exceed $300,000. The statutory liability limit means, very literally, that the city and LMCIT won't fully compensate that individual for his/her injuries which the city caused. Because of this, some cities may decide that as a matter of public policy you want to have more than $300,000 available to compensate a citizen who has been injured by the city's negligence. For this reason, LMCIT gives the city the option to waive the statutory liability limit if the city wishes to do so. By waiving the statutory limit, the city makes it possible for a claimant to recover up to the full limit of the city's LMCIT liability coverage. Since it increases the exposure, there is an additional premium charge of 3.5% if the city decides to waive the statutory per - person limit. If a city decides to waive the statutory liability limit and doesn't carry the optional excess liability coverage, the city's coverage would essentially be identical to the current coverage but with a higher per - occurrence limit. For cities that carry the optional excess Liability coverage, the waiver also applies to that coverage. The decision to waive or not to waive the statutory liability limits must be made by the city council. The package of renewal materials includes a form that must be completed and returned to LMCIT to document the council's decision on whether or not to waive the statutory limits. Here's a shorthand summary of the practical effects of that decision: • If the city does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover no more than $300,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be limited to $750,000. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless of whether or not the city purchases the optional excess liability coverage. • If the city waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover up to $750,000 on a single occurrence on a claim to which the statutory limits apply. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be limited to $750,000, regardless of the number of claimants. • If the city waives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants. Sub - limits and aggregate limits Besides the general coverage limit of $750,000, the LMCIT liability coverage includes some sub - limits and/or annual aggregate limits on liability coverage for certain specific exposures. Exposure Per occurrence limit Annual aggregate limit Products and Completed operations $750,000 $750,000 Failure to supply utilities $750,000 $750,000 Electromagnetic fields $750,000 $1,500,000 Fire damage liability $50,000 - Limited pollution * $750,000 $750,000 Lead or asbestos * $200,000 $200,000 Land use and development litigation * $1,000,000 $1,000,000 * Legal defense costs and loss adjustment costs are included within the coverage limit for these exposures. The optional "medical payments" coverage, which provides "no- fault" coverage for medical costs for injuries that occur on city premises, has limits of $1000 /claimant and $10,000 /occurrence. The optional excess liability coverage Each city should regularly review and consider whether it makes sense to carry excess liability coverage for added protection on claims to which the statutory limits don't apply. The LMCIT memo on excess liability coverage discusses various reasons to consider carrying excess liability coverage. Call LMCIT for a copy of that memo if you don't have it. Questions? As always, feel free to all your underwriter or Pete Tritz or Tom Grundhoefer if you have questions. PST- 1/13/98 LMCIT LIABILITY COVERAGE - WAIVER FORM Cities obtaining liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust must decide whether or not to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. The ' • decision to waive or not to waive the statutory limits has the following effects: ...y. . • If the city does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover no more than $300,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which-all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would.be_limited to $750,000. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless of whether or not the city purchases the optional excess liability coverage. • If the city waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover up to $750,000 on a single occurrence. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to $750,000, regardless of the number of claimants. I f the city waives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants. Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision. This decision must be made by the city council. Cities purchasing coverage must complete and return this form to LMCIT before the cffecti, c date of ti,. coverage. For further informau„r,, You may also wish to discuss these issues with your city attorney. The City of accepts liability coverage limits of $ from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). Check one: The city DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. The city WAIVES the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04, to the extent of the limits of the liability coverage obtained from LMCIT. Date of city council meeting Signature Position Return this completed form to LMCIT, 145 University Ave. W., St. Paul, MN. 55103 -2044 Page 1 of 1 FR.ON : CENT PHONE NO. : 651 429 8623 Jan. 25 1933 12:43Pr1 P2 • L v JAN 1 2 1999 ■ r 1C 145 University A' cnuo West, Sr. Pant IN 55103.2044 Loom°° timosn <Cao: Phone: (651) 281.1200 • (800) 925 -1122 Cog' promoting ceat•ce Fax: (651) 281 -1299 • TDD (651) 281 -1290 r January 4, 1999 TO: Member Cities FROM: 1_MCIT RE Coverage for Injuries to Elected and Appointed Officials LMCIT is currently offering open enrollment for accident coverage for injuries to elected and appointed officials. This coverage, which is provided by CIGNA, provides an alternative to workers compensation coverage for elected officials and members of other city boards who may be injured in the course of their duties. The enclosed memo describes the differences in costs and , ^nests between the two coverages. Horn do I add Ibis coverage to the city's policy? Jf you currently have this occident coverage and wish to renew :t, or if your city would like to add this accident coverage for the first time, please contact Julie Seidlitz with the Brehm Group at 612/339-7385 and she will send you an application form with information to enroll your city with this coverage. The application form needs to be completed and returned no later than 2 February 1, 1999 for coverage to be effective March 1, 1999 through February 29, 2000. AN EQUAL OPPcFrt.n.nr /AY IRM.;Trt e ACrtos EMMtPLOYER ;701: CENT P.' -CNE rip. : 651 429 8629 Jai. 26 1339 12: r` 1=7 P. .. — — [f LNIC>T . ~r � _ � R isk IVLanagernent Information L 1C 145 University Ave West, St Pad, MN 55103-2044 Phone: (651) 281.1200 • (600) 925-1122 Ci t!c. "(M' " " ° " C "' fax: (651) 281 -1299 • TDD (651) 281.1290 Cities o wn ", ; "e .�.n. "�. COVERAGE FOR INJURIES TO ELECTED AND A OFFICIALS The work compensation statutes provide benefits to an "employee" who is injured while working. M.S. 176.011, subd. 9, (5), provides that "municipal officers elected or appointed for a regular term of office" are considered to be "employees" for workers compensation purposes only if the city has passed an ordinance or resolution to that effect. An elected or appointed official injured while performing his or her duties would not be eligible for workers compensation benefits unless the city had passed that ordinance cr resolution. Whom does this affect? This provision clearly applies to mayors and council members. In some cities the clerk and treasurer are elected positions, and are therefor covered by this provision as well. it seems likely that members of other administrative boards that the city creates pursuant to statute such as planting commissions, utilities commissions, park boards, hospital or nursing home boards, etc. would fall under this provision as well. Its not clear though whether a member of a purely advisory committee or commission that the city creates would be considered to be an "officer" or "official" for purposes of this statute. Some charters may provide specific terms for certain appointed positions such as tl :e assessor, engineer, police chief, etc. Under a strict reading of the work comp statute, these individuals would not be covered by workers compensation unless the city has passed an ordinance or resolution to add coverage - assuming that these individuals wettid be considered "officers" rasher than merely "employees." If we want to add coverage, brow should the ordinance or resolution be worded? The resolution or ordinance should specifically list the positions the city intends to cover. 1: the city wishes to extend coverage only to the mayor and council, the ordinance or resolution should refer specifically and only to elected officials. An ordinance to extend coverage to members of other boards and commissions, could be worded this way: "Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 176.011, subd. 9, clause 5, elected officials and members of the following boards. commissions, and ccnimittees are included in the coverage of the workers compensation act: planning commission, park board, 1 utilities commission..." ,•.N EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMFLCYEF FRJ'1 : �'4T PaaE r4J. : 651 429 3623 Jan. 26 1333 12:52P1 =•4 • It [I::: city :�i'.pO Ll (. �ositiori s such as police Chief or :isseSSLr have a specific ter:!:. these )CI5.tb't!S should lit' as :e :c as %cell. Ii s not completely clear whether the ci'.y can cIstln_uisll among its elected and appointed officials, by providing workers compensation to some officials but not to ethers. The statute perhaps could be read to mean that the city's only options are either to cover all elected and appointed officials or none at all. If so, an ordinance or resolution extending coverage, regardless of how it is worded, might be interpreted to mean that all "officials" are covered. Then the question of whether, say, planning commission members are covered would depend not on whether they are listed in the ordinance or resolution but rather on whether they are "officials' or "officers." Such an interpretation seems unlikely, but cities should at least be aware of the possibility /s there any reason to use an ordinance rather than a resolution? if the city kvishes :o provide workers ccmpensation coverage far elec:cd officials, it is preferable to tier: an ordinance rather than a resolution. Resolutions are often recorded only in the council minutes; year later it can be very difficult and time- consurnit:g to track down a resolution. We've seen a number of cases where a city has been paying premiums for workers compensation coverage for elected officials for years, but now can't find any ordinance or resolution specifying that elected officials are covered. An ordinance will generally be easier to keep track of perir.enently, since it is recorded in the city's ordinance book as well as in the council minmes- Do Ire treed to do anything special if roe don't want to con•?: elected officials for r:orkers c onzpen ca: iQn ? (f the city does not wish to cover its elected officials for . or'sers compensation, it nil :zit be wise to puss on ordinance to that effect as well unless you are absolutely certain that the city has never passrd a resolution to provide coverage. That resolution could have been passed as long 220 as 1967, when the raw was first amended to permit cities to opt for coverage. The dxl.owirg language could be used for the ordinance: "The officers of the City of _ elected or appointed for a regular term of office s±i not x included in the coverage of the Minnesota Workers Compensation Act, pursuant to Minnesota Statute 1 76.01 1, subdivision 9 clause 6." .How mach does it cost to add workers compensation coverage for elected officials.? Workers compensation for elected officials used to be a pretty expensive proposition. However, over the past several years, LMCIT has very substantially reduced premiums for th coverage, :c bring tae cote mote in line with the acr:l& risk iii J'1 : C '4T P`fl' . "JJ. : 651 429 9.:23 1JJ:1 • t ci•, from the benefits that vron:c1 be plc\ i fed by workers 1 ! - „y �rn'Lrn � �t C4'21'� ... %eEl ;l[lY , c)supers :[ion. Some or the more important chffercnces arc: • The accident rx?hey does not pay for medical costs. The individual would have :o look to his own health ccvera e to pick up these costs • Disability benefits would continue for a maximum of 26 weeks• By contrast, workers compensation benefits would continue as long as the disability lasts. • Benefits are payable only if the individ.tai is totally disabled from performing the duties of his regular employment. Unlike workers compensation, the policy provides no benefits for partial: disability. • Death and disability benefits are paid according to a fixed schedule. Workers compensation tenet; by contrast, are based on the individual's actual earnings, from both his regular employment at.c his council pay. - Workers compensation includes various other benefits, such as rehabilitation, rctrainic2- etc.; the acciJL fit pnlict does not. • Workers compensation benefits are tax-exempt; some or all of the benefits paid under at. accident policy night be taxable. Obviously, there are many "borderline” situations where it might be debatable whether a council member is "conducting official council business on behalf and at the request of the council." For example, a mayor or council member might be asked individually to attend a meeting of the Chamber of Commerce or a service club to discuss and explain city policies or proposals the council n considering. Cities might want to consider adopting a resolution specifying whether the city considers such activities to be within the scope of duties that the city expects its elected of'.icials to perform-L. T - 12'21 :;ij • !xc G,p40 FR :r1 IT PriONE NJ. ;51 423 3523 Tai. 25 1333 12:51x:1 ?_ :n e S!00o! ayroli. TP.israre is For elected eft oas ]fill l' s ac .. n s,pnliod cit.c: to the official's l salary or to an i •1T d salary of j7 n1S citi since is c,reater. ribciousl} the imputed minimum salary will come into Flirty in moist council salaries in most cities are much less than that. Using the imputed n'.iaLmrl salary. the -manual premium conies to $60 for a five member council. The actual cost to the city may be son :calm- more or less than that, depending on the city's e\r crltr.cc modification, volume discount. and cie .uctib,e if any. This same approach and rate will also be used to calculate premiums for coverage for any other boards, commissions, or committees which are specified in the city's ordinance or resolution e tend:no cnveragc. Unless the city specifically indicates that members of a particular board are covered, L'4CIT will assume that they are not. For .3`ft ills other than members of the council and Dose; board c :c ;t bers, premiums will be based on the actual salary and the appropriate class rate. • What benefits h'ould an Of receive under Workers eompensaiion As 'sill- any other employee, indemnity benefits would be based on :he individual's actua: earnings from all employment. In other words, benefits would be based on the total earnings from the official's regular employment plus the salary (if any) he receives from the city. The S70 per week imputed minimum salary is used solely to calculate premiums, and does no: figure into the benefit calculation in any way. Are there unv alternative ways to protect elected officials and heard members? LEA: iT has arranged with CIGNA to offer another option through which cities can provide _ome protection for their council members against the risk of being injur or killed in the course Of perc'rmmn their duties. For a cost of 512..75 per person per year. the city can purchase an accident policy which provides benefits for death or a dtsahl:ng injury arising ou: of an accident which o:.curs while the council member is traveling to. particiratir.g in. or travehr.g from a regularly :came ocil scheduled council meeting, or while conducting official un business on behalf and at the re,uest of the council. The policy provides a death benefit of S i 00,000. 1: aso provides a schedule of kmp sure benef.r. f. :;r loss of a hand, foot. or eve. The policy also p:c vides a shoe[ -term disab lily bunch! of $100 per week. Disability benefits are payable for a r axiir.t: n of 26 wee s, after a three -day waiting period. Disability benefits would be paid if as the result of a covered injury the individ c annot do a all the s u$tantial and mate.ial duties nt l :i type of work. Citizen and Business Person of the Year Criteria for nomination The following is the EDC report to the City Council on the nomination criteria for the Citizen and Business Person of the Year. ❑ Citizen of the Year- This person would need to be a resident of the city within the calendar year of nomination. ❑ Business Person of the Year- Would not have to be a resident of Centerville, but would need to be business owner conducting business within the city during the calendar year of nomination. ❑ The Citizen or Business Person being nominated should be nominated for volunteer efforts or accomplishments that they have made to the city for the calendar year that the nomination is for. The lifetime achievement award may better honor nominations for things done years before. ❑ We would like to see the voting for these honors done by all City Staff and City Committees, i.e. Planning and Zoning, Economic Development, Parks and Recreation. This would open the voting to 30 or more votes making it a better across the board ratio than having just one committee responsible for the vote. ❑ The actual voting process would take place by paper ballot that would be placed in sealed envelopes and tabulated by the EDC or City Staff. The ballots would be numbered in order to keep track as to which ballots have been returned or as indication of voting, if needed. If an individual voting serves on more than one committee or is on a committee and a staff member they would be allowed only one ballot for voting. ❑ If a member of any of the city committees or city staff were nominated for an award they would be removed from voting for that award. For example if Ted Red was nominated for Business Person of the Year and he also served on the Planning and Zoning Board he would be removed from voting for Business Person of the Year, but would be included in the voting of Citizen of the Year. This would be beneficial in avoiding any conflict of interest regarding the voting. ❑ We also believe that no one should be excluded from the process if they have received the award in the past. An example would be that if Ted Red won Citizen of the Year in 1997 and was nominated again in 1998 they should still be considered for the 1998 award. ❑ Points would be earned from the actual voting process. This process would be done by a ranking system. If you have five nominees you would rank them from 1 -5 with 5 being the top score. The number of nominees would determine the number of points used for this process. The ranking system would make certain that everyone has a vote. Example: Nominees Highest Ranking Possible 5 Jane Doe 4 points John Jones 3 points fee Sam Sails 1 points V nN' Fran Fan 2 points ,, II Ted Red 5 points (/ Ri e � The ballots would be totaled: 1 `)(, Le (// ( l` ( S Example: ^ ,�1/ � Nu /� 2 L X 4 Jane Doe Ballot votes j u R 60 points Johns Jones Ballot votes G 40 points D CY Sam Sails Ballot votes ` 100 points Z Fran Fan Ballot votes 85 points , c, 1 ev - L Ted Red Ballot votes 123 points The nominee receiving the most votes would be awarded the award. We would also like to see recognition certificates presented to the next two highest vote recipients. We would like to see all nominees publicly recognized and thanked. ;� y Whether that be through a council meeting, article in city newsletter or 1, ,V article in local newspapers. � \ U C CY e DC members feel the losers may not want to be recognized so 0 publicl. Another option may be to do a letter of recognition signed by ity Council members and leave it at that. This process we feel would be a better system and would give residents and business credit for what they have accomplished as well as increasing the voting process with more voters involved. In the event of a tie we believe it would be better to give out two awards rather than try to break a tie by a draw or other means. Presenting of the Awards Business Person of the Year: We would like to see the Business Person of the Year presented his or her award in May during the Business Appreciation Dinner sponsored by the EDC. Citizen of the Year: We are open to suggestions for the presenting of this award. We felt it would be nice to see this award presented at a Council Meeting in the beginning of the year, with additional recognition during the Fete De Lac City Celebration. Tim Rehbine would suggest that the citizen of the year be presented at the Business Appreciation Dinner along with the Business Person of Year with additional recognition during the Fete De Lac city celebration. The attached is an example of the revised nomination form that we would like to have in place for this year's nomination. We would also like to take the nominations for 1998 and conduct a revote based on the new voting process. City of Centerville Citizen of the Year Nomination Form Name of Nominee: Phone: Address: Please check and write in the name of organizations, groups, and committees in which the nominee is actively involved i.e., city council, parks & recreation, planning & zoning, EDC, Centerville Lions, Centerville Parents Association, Boy & Girl Scouts, Church committees, School involvement etc. Use "Other" for any not listed. ❑ City of Centerville Committee: ❑ Local Organization: ❑ Local Organization: ❑ School: ❑ Church: Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: Please list below the tasks that the nominee has accomplished during this past year that have been of benefit to Centerville and its residents: Are there any other factors you feel may be important to consider regarding this nominee Nominated by Date Address: Phone: City of Centerville Business Person of the Year Nomination Form Name of Nominee: Phone: Address: Please check and write in the name of organizations, groups, and committees in which the nominee is actively involved i.e., city council, parks & recreation, planning & zoning, EDC, Centerville Lions, Centerville Parents Association, Boy & Girl Scouts, Church committees, School involvement etc. Use "Other" for any not listed. ❑ City of Centerville Committee: ❑ Local Organization: ❑ Local Organization: ❑ School: ❑ Church: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: ❑ Other: Please list below the tasks that the nominee has accomplished during this past year that have been of benefit to Centerville and its residents: Are there any other factors you feel may be important to consider regarding this nominee Nominated by Date Address: Phone: MEMORANDUM DATE: February 18, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk RE: Consider the Purchase of a Podium - Cable Franchise Fees It has come to Staff's attention that a podium in the Council chambers may benefit the meetings efficiency and enhance the professional atmosphere. If the Council elects to authorize the purchase of a podium, I recommend using franchise funds. In March, the City will receive 1998 Cable Franchise funds of approximately $3,250. This should not be confused with the cable excess funds that will be returned to member Cities. The following are some purchasing options: 1. Purchase a Podium from a business supply house $200.00 - $2,000 (See attached). 2. Request Public Works construct a podium - $200.00 materials/labor. 3. Hire a local woodworker to construct the podium. 4. Request the council table maker to construct a podium to match the Council table. The following are possible components: 1. A Microphone 2. Stationary or with wheels 3. Color 4. Design Please contact me at City Hall with questions or if you need additional information. car �leetin g Room Lecte lf tampp z, - I n otind udetl, a � t .� , � � 3'x �- v� # ys K . t t t � • . r y n Y`b+ f . .2 r \� BIa - 1 I L . ® t ,� '4 J nc' nr le 1 .+ � y l l� j Walnut , T �F .rh .... u = _ . F r"di ...J I�� � 11�/. J ; 1 . ! J J C - r II i �sr 4 - �* Legs retract and unit carries 't.` as easily as luggage t e�� -t. - - - sit i 41 Mobie Lecter Tabletop or with the Vertiflex ase AV cart. ' $ � , ` ., � , f Six built - in speakers project Y to an audience of i ` l' Use A . e L e 3000. I e i Yi , _ flllf lz. batte VRT -50067 /T� m 1i • �a , _ 0 _ - r _ Sla nted too w : tis.- � '` - `� the rmafuseo r R- q c+ 3 On —altt hg , t cea led storaee 1 t 6d x 46 %h. S . VRT -50051 �" 'ct+e� 0 VflT -50052 � (OX' Microphone clips VRi- 502c "5 © Sound Column Stand p to tape) or blouse. Each AMPL/ - VOX CORDLESS Six- speaker column for a Ampli -Vox sound systems Up Lectern — PUBLIC ADDRESS Elegant high-pressure udiences up to 3000. © Wireless Microphone Kitre B Tabletop L S SLECTER/Lr5 casters. Six eceiver laminate. Concealed to wire ass B `s all 2 0-50 266 base b • For indoor or outdoors APL- 5500- 10 Shinate 93 operated transmitter, tr and P ss. Battery 2pd /ah. Sr • For rot speech 2 ' /awx'kdx4h. lapel mike Ea B O, with Powerful 50 multimedia ready amp APL -5500 WT Mahogany APL-S1600 3 miq input for compu ter /CD, to APL-S500-WT Walnut ................................... outputs for tape recorderandueand Each .. ... . a - RT -5 9 Wireless Each into VRT 50 to f our er eakers p 1 169 . 00 R oam freely Han dheld Micro Ea • Professional handheld 0 Roving Rostrum—Luggage Y anywhere in Phone — 15 -1t. cord an eldmike with opens to become m— Luggage style case audience. State of the a r oom, even into 0 Mobile Le and mike ho /d er audiences up me a sound system lect f or consistent signal art electronics s AV cart • All units run on p to 1000. 9nal of unidirectional mike with ensure a n 100 bartenes not 763/4 speaker Two 6 x 9 speakers, 3 00 - ft. range. Requires wireless 27 50266. Two or to or convert to a rechargeable incl.) 76' / aw cable. Retractable sold with k mike r eceiver shelf 213/4w x 1 ACcharger /adapter (sold system— x 77h. 5h legs. Black. APL - 51600. systm APL- 5722- OK.. .............................. P 20 IbEach 5599.00 APL- 57605 ................................... Each S299 VR7-50060 1 Sound System Tabletop Lectern — AMPL; VOX „0 For audiences up to 7 000. Wood VRT - 50267 1 wrnc�lothgrillespeakercover. Shown Tabletop Le tern melamine ill Lectern Lamp—Clip-on Each with Cart . h gri x 20 x 0o cover Vermflex Includes 25W bulb. 8 -. cor xb4 �d base. P` Wireless °'' =' mfp e E laminate v NT(q APL - 5250 -OK Medium over 4916s. APL- 5170D- Portabl Rich look for for APL -5250- GD ................................ Each 849 Each... Walnut © Lapel .......... .............................. P Microphone —Handf extens with dd� board rooms G Address System min la • ..5599.Op sional cardioid mike. 40" cord, 12-ft. ion w u watts ss audio 0 transmitter PA base broadcasts El ieruseex Mobile Letter cable for wireless orconde s 0 Presidents Tabletop as an AV cart or as Base/AV APL - 52030..,.,,, condenser mike. attaches the wireless t utput. Speaker Casters —Four Lectern. a base for w /< thermofused Each §gg,pp clip-on microphone ransmitter to belt and for i; lamina ch p neto'acke r easy mobil r, Two locking casters and melamine � AC A Ater /Bartery Rechargers— complete freedom j L shirt o r blouse for Paper stop. Two shelf. 24w x and concealed P socket movement. el Amplifier run r e VRi- 20d x 33ych. Shpg, wt 59 lbs. 50/60 charge f v e b atteries. 9 -ft. cord. into standard C batteries (sold separately) x 20' / <d x 46h. Si VRi -S 0060 Medium Oak its 1 charge uni cord. standard socket. Transmitter o or plugs •- 0061 Walnut APL -57450 15 volt ...................... Each 9 -v olt Powered by •VRTVRT •5009D 50243 MM Sr .............. APL - 51460 18 volt......... , . 899.00 APO -P ry (Inc (included), Weighs only ................ ........................5773,0 .. ..........Each 89.00 .0 A5000............................... Each 542 Each Each §422.50 MEETING AC CESSORIES 194 ` r s 283 THESE MANUFACTURER LIST PRICES ARE Su C All items on a This symbol denotes items that cannot sh pw a U CALL US FOq CUH S • ibis symbol Meeting Room M1 lack t- ,, i� j # it l rl 1 C t '''l t i r I I r ' I I ��� ' t '� 1 �tl it i _� k yi 4 j ' 1 I '� � I� I leC:1� I iI � d � ' kt � I IlllIj' f! 'i'r# r '. Li ' ,. I': t3 CIS, t I I ' ' - r k� Pk !. Walnut Medium Oak - : , r _ i. I _3 1 V I I I LLA LECTERNS f Y. t timed tcp with paper ledge to hold notes. b i r t Pe.. o:Lsrd melamine laminate. � I e One•Piece Standup Lectern Con- �j � ctaec stcrcoe shelf. With floor glides ' 23w x Lectern base doubles as L '1/4 .6h ' shoo wt. 68 lbs. t rl a n AV Cart 1e� J 4 a o arty VE -Y.C52 um Oak .� p aT? rs or mob Iiry `t k m t?"Y*- tr.50265 Maregany ( f .< . ) n oel or biome 3198.75 _ .IIIIla0111 ® .. Tabletop lectern —Use alone or with the _cones: ;r 1 t base below for a 45 "h lectern. 24w x re Kit - a13YJs. Snpg wt. 30 lbs. - 1 ■ to :rrceles r .. : Medium Oak ' elver and la 1 ., 9 Walnut _ � _ - .`�' "�' Mahogany ` .iCl�_ °"'� - L„�. �� .......E ° 5 . 3 ' ' I 5112.25 ! Id Mrcrgph _Mollie Lectern Ba '4V Cart—Use as 1 r . -.zeal. es'� N Wl Or as Las- ; - 30058/50059/ - f �rcmcs . .Iwo Icck ng c.. a„ and concealed • i i r ci i gnal n � A1%'0 c3 ' n. Snpg. wt. 591bs , .rrt_ < ` 902 Medium Oak ho- 'T.: Walnut Each ' • Ltahoaaa ti,, Y 517300 . SERIES LECTERNS ' s . +al meetings, conferences and 11101# r -- t]._ - -e hermofused meta- A. .wfi pore merging .' r _ • s . • Standup - . 7 T..:.� ++t em ' 6lddenc - rn with � � } ., !: • 7i.•7R .z il:b`- er - ace ",1.1 :::o .coking) - - — -- p , Sl ante d too rich generous - f t s = ii pt • r 4 . .." Storage shelves. 25'/+w • -• �'' u " i Va. 105 lbs. Presidential Instructor Stand— © Hospitality Service Cart— Fold-away I`G -ea 'L.' Oak ©rsatile mobile stand can be used as AV cart, leafs expand serving area to 56W wide- Deep mc , sol- = ,'Lira . - /Black Trim beverage cart or for storage and distribution of drawer and locking cabinet for storage. Four "'� • -• 5417.00 meeting materials. Removable shelf inside lock- casters, two locking. 32'hw x 20 x 38'/4h. 'y ing double doors. Four casters (two locking). Shpg. wt. 128lbs. " :111r r 29 x 20'hd x 41h. Shpg. wt. 124 lbs. •VRT•50246 Medium Oak *VRT -50245 Medium Oak •VRT -50075 Mahogany /Black :� reuu- assembly. WRT -50084 Mahogany /Black Trim Each $425.00 ,. — Each 4367.00 L. cannot :No via UPS EASEL PADS 754 4 t + MEMORANDUM DATE: February 18, 1999 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk RE: 1999 Commercial Rubbish Licenses The city is in receipt of the commercial rubbish license payments and applications. After reviewing the submitted information I found everything to be in order. I recommend approving the 1999 Commercial Rubbish Licenses. Please call me if you have any questions or if you would like additional information. The following is a list of commercial garbage haulers used by businesses in Centerville. Waste Management - Blaine 10050 Naples St. NE Blaine, MN 55449 612 - 783 -5444 ACE Solid Waste 3118 162nd Lane NW Anoka, MN 55304 612 - 427 -3110 Walters Rubbish P.O. Box 67 Circle Pines, MN 55014 612- 780 -8464 55038 ,IterviC MN 1 880 Main Street • Centerville, ' 1857 (612) 429.3232 • Fax (612) 429 -8629 January 27, 1999 Waste Management 10050 Naples St. NE Blaine, MN 55449 Dear Waste Management: I have enclosed an application for commercial rubbish collection. Please be informed that according to City Ordinance #65, Commercial Rubbish Collection, your business must be licensed for commercial garbage hauling within the City of Centerville. As of this date, the City is not in receipt of a license request for 1999. Please send the enclosed application with a check in the amount of $250.00 to the City of Centerville by February 16, 1999. Feel free to contact me at the above number if I can be of further assistance or if you should have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC/MCMC City Clerk cc: Honorable Mayor and Council - • 1� tervi 1880 Main Street • Centerville, Ma( 55038 Estagished 1857 (612) 429 -3232 • Fax (612) 429 -8629 CITY OF CENTERVILLE APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL RUBBISH COLLECTION DATE OF APPTICATION February 4, 1999 NAME OF RI JSTNF,SS Waste Management Inc. of Minnesota - Blaine ADDRESS 10050 Naples St. NE Blaine, MN 55449 PHONE (612) 783 - 5464 FAX (612) 783 - 5477 EMAIL N/A • 1otervi(Ce 1880 Main Street • Centerville, Ma( 55038 `' Established 1857 (612) 429 -3232 • Fax (612) 429 -8629 January 27, 1999 Walters Rubbish PO Box 67 Circle Pines, MN 55014 Dear Walters Rubbish: I have enclosed an application for commercial rubbish collection. Please be informed that according to City Ordinance #65, Commercial Rubbish Collection, your business must be licensed for commercial garbage hauling within the City of Centerville. As of this date, the City is not in receipt of a license request for 1999. Please send the enclosed application with a check in the amount of $250.00 to the City of Centerville by February 16, 1999. Feel free to contact me at the above number if I can be of further assistance or if you should have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, ���p �Q Ry -CAtka_ Gaustad, CMC/MCMC City Clerk cc: Honorable Mayor and Council FEB 1 6 1999 x EterviCCe • MN 55038 E 1880 Main Street • CenteruiLfe, Established 1857 (612) 429.3232 • Fat (612) 429 -8629 CITY OF CENTERVILLE APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL RUBBISH COLLECTION DATE, OF APPLICATION ¼'- Veil it NAM/E. , c &cOF FR JSSJNFS S W D D /� I)" �-G -y�ZI7 0) Lf (✓f� ADDRESS f /0 /Dx & GI v�l a61/11s /111AK 455ory PHONE. Cal r S?tia FAX E-MA �l`� f Ste. terv e cc 1880 Main Street • Centerville, MT( 55038 Established 1857 (612) 429 -3232 • Fax (612) 429.8629 January 27, 1999 ACE Solid Waste 3118 162nd Lane NW Anoka, MN 55304 Dear ACE Solid Waste: I have enclosed an application for commercial rubbish collection. Please be informed that according to City Ordinance #65, Commercial Rubbish Collection, your business must be licensed for commercial garbage hauling within the City of Centerville. As of this date, the City is not in receipt of a license request for 1999. Please send the enclosed application with a check in the amount of $250.00 to the City of Centerville by February 16, 1999. Feel free to contact me at the above number if I can be of further assistance or if you should have any questions regarding this matter Sincerely, j ).\"l (,cC.t Ry -het Gaustad, CMC/MCMC City Clerk cc: Honorable Mayor and Council 3. , i tervi e 1880 Main Street • Centerville, M9( 55038 612 Established 1857 ( ) 429.3232 • Fax (612) 429 -8629 CITY OF CENTERVILLE APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL RUBBISH COLLECTION J)ATF ii OFAPPT.TCATLQN n r t" �1 l NAME OF RTLSTNF.SS F n �Asf E AT)T)RF,ss rc\f , ene-k 55307-► PHONE LC�z - FAX F_MATT" L STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION 99 -01 1999 APPOINTMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Centerville met on January 13, 1999, at City Hall; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Centerville discussed appointments for the 1999 year; THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE HEREBY RESOLVES, the following persons are hereby appointed to the named positions; 1. Acting Mayor - Theresa Brenner 2, Animal Control - Otter Lake Animal Care Center 3. Assessor - Anoka County 4. Auditor - Abdo, Abdo and Eick, Inc. 5. A. Cable TV Representative B. Alternate A. - Terry Sweeney B. - Ry -Chet Gaustad 6. Centerville Centennial Fire District Steering Committee Members - Mayor Tom Wilharber - Theresa Brenner 7. Circle Pines/Lexington Police Liaison - Mayor Tom Wilharber 8. City Attorney - Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. 9. Celebration Committee Representative - Theresa Brenner 10. City Engineer - Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates 11. City Forester - DNR - Art Widerstrom - Joe Goetz 12. Centerville Economic Development Task Force - Tim Rehbein - Paul Montain John Magill Mary Capra 13. Centerville Economic Development Liaison - Richard Travis 14. Drainage Ordinance Committee - Staff 15. Drug Testing - HNSA 16. Emergency Services Directors (Civil Defense) - Milo Bennett Paul Palzer Joel Heckman 17. Fire Marshall - Milo Bennett 18. Fire Protection - Centennial Fire District 19. Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) - Anoka County HRA - Theresas Brenner 20. Health Officer - Laura Powers 21. Intergovernmental Relations Representative - Mayor Tom Wilharber 22. Municipal Financial Advisor - Ehlers and Associates 23. Official Depository - Firstar State Bank -Hugo and Twin City 24. Federal Savings and Loan - Maplewood, 4M and 4M+ Funds, Smith Barney 25. Official Newspaper - Press Publications 26, Park and Recreation Committee Dale Larson Michael Navin Steve Brown Doug Porter Donald Bahneman 27. Park and Recreation Committee Liaison - Terry Sweeney 28. Planning and Zoning Commission Kathy Welk Allen LaMotte Linda Broussard - Vickers John Buckbee Brian Hanson 29. Planning and Zoning Commission Liaison - Mari Nelson 30. Police Protection - Circle - Lexington Police Department 31. Recycling Coordinator - Randy Hagerty 32. Responsible Authority - Jim March 33. Rice Creek Watershed District Representative - Richard Travis 34. Senior Transportation Representative - Staff 35. Solid Waste Representative - Randy Hagerty 36. Weed Inspector - Mayor Tom Wilharber 37. Y2K Cordinator - Mari Nelson Passed by the City Council of the City of Centerville this 13th day of January, 1999. Mayor Tom Wilharber ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk RESOLUTION 99 -02 APPROVING FEE SCHEDULE FOR 1999 THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLVES: Section 1. The following fees for indicated sales, permits and licenses are approved: ALE FEF, Administrative Fees 100.00 per unit/lot Antenna Permit Application Fee 1,250.00 Assessment Search 20.00 Bingo Permit 15.00 Building Permits See Exhibit "A" Cigarette License 75.00 Charitable Gambling: Investigative Fee 50.00 Permit Fee 20.00 Commercial Rubbish Collection License Fee 250.00 (Exclusive to Commercial and Industrial Businesses) Damage Deposit 200.00 Dance Permit 100.00 Dog License 12.00 Replacement Tag 2.00 Filing Fees 2.00 Fill Permit See Exhibit "B" Final Plat Fee - Filing 200.00 1 Resolution 99 -02 Kennel Permit Fee 25.00 Liquor Licenses: 3.2 Beer Permit - Special Events 35.00 plus $5.00 for each add'l day Off -Sale Liquor 100.00 Off -Sale Non - Intoxication Liquor 20.00 On -Sale Liquor See Exhibit "C" On -Sale Non - Intoxication Liquor 250,00 Sunday Liquor License 200.00 Wine License 300.00 Lot Split 175.00 plus legal fees Mailbox Group Stand Fee 25.00 per unit Maps and Charts 5.00 Mileage Rate 0.325 per mile Mining/Grading Permits See Exhibit "B" Park Dedication Fees - per dwelling unit Land Dedication / 1200.00 Trail Dedication (waived if developer installs trails and walkways per City Council) Park Ball Field Use - Per Tournament 200.00 Permit Surcharge See Exhibit "D" Photo Copies 0.25 per page (one side) Plumbing Permits See Exhibit "E" Preliminary Plat Fee - Filing 200.00 PUD Application Fee 200.00 Research Charge 20.00 half hour minimum charge 30.00 for each hour thereafter Rezoning Requests 250.00 plus additional expenses Residential Equivalent Unit 1,750.00 2 Resolution 99 -02 Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) 1,050.00 Sewer Utility Billing (Quarterly) 39.00 per unity/10% late fee Senior Discount 33.00 per unit/10% late fee Site Maintenance Deposit 225.00 Special Use Permit 75.00 plus legal & engineering fees Transient Sales See Exhibit "F" Variance Request 175.00 Water Hook Up 1,300.00 Water Meter Deposit See Exhibit "G" Water Meter/MIU 276.00 Water Utility Billing See Exhibit "G" Wild and Exotic Animal Permit Fee 25.00 Section 2. these fees shall become effective on approval by the City Council of the City of Centerville. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CENTERVILLE ON JANUARY 13, 1999. Mayor Tom Wilharber ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk 3 • EXHIBIT A BUILDING PERMIT FEES TOTAL VALUATION FEE $1.00 to $500.00 $22.00 $501.00 to $2,000.00 $22.00 for the first $500.00 plus $2.75 for each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00. $2,001.00 to $25,00;0.00 $63.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus $12.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00. $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $352.00 for the first $25,000.00 plus $9.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00. $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $580.00 for the first $50,000.00 plus $6.25 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00. $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $895.00 for the first $100,000.00 plus $5.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof. $500,000.00 to $i $2,855.00 for the first $500,000.00 plus $4.25 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00. $1,000,000.00 and up $4,955.00 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $2.75 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof. Other Inspections and Fees: 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours.... $42.00 per hour* (minimum - two hours). 4 • $XHIBIT A CONTINUTATION 2. Reinspection fees assessed under provision of Section 305 (g) $42.00 per hours* 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically assigned (minimum charge of 1/2 hour) $42.00 per hour 4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revision of plans $42.00 per hour (minimum charge of 1/2 hour) 5. For use of outside consultant's for plan checking and inspections or, both actual cost Charge a flat fee for the building permit plan review of $50.00 for finishing the basement of an existing occupied dwelling by the homeowner. • • • 5 • • EXHIBIT B LANDFILL, GRADING & EXCAVATING PERMIT FEES GRADING FEES General. Fees shall be assessed in accordance with the provisions of this section or shall be as set forth in the fee schedule adopted by the jurisdiction. Plan Review Fees. When a plan or other data are required to be submitted, a plan review fee shall be paid at the time of submitting plans and specifications for review. Said plan revi =t:; fee shall be set forth in Table A33 -A. Separate plan review fees shall apply to retaining walls or major drainage structures as required elsewhere in this code. For excavation and fill on the same site the fee shall be based on the volume of excavation or fill, whichever is greater. Grading Permit Fees. A fee for each grading permit shall be paid to the building official as set forth in Table A33 -B. Separate permits and fees shall apply to retaining walls or major drainage structures as required elsewhere in this code. There shall be no separate charge for standard terrace drains and similar facilities. TABLE A33 -A GRADING PLAN REVIEW FEES 50 cubic yards (38.2 m3) or less No Fee 51 to 100 cubic yards (40 m3 to 76.5 m3) $15.00 101 to 1,000 cubic yards (77.2 m3 to 764.6 m3) $22.50 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards (765.3 m3 to 7645.5 m3) $30.00 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards (7646.3 m3 to 76455 m3) - $30.00 for the first 10,000 cubic yards (7645.5 m3), plus $9.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards (76456 m3 to 152911 m3) - $165.00 for the first 100,000 cubic yards, plus $9.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 200,001 cubic yards or more - $255.00 for the first 200,000 cubic yards, plus $4.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. Other Fees: • Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved plans $30.00 (minimum charge of one -half hour) per hour* *Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, .equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved. 6 EXHIBIT B CONTINUTATION GRADING PERMIT FEES* 50 cubic yards (38.2 m3) or less $15.00 51 to 100 cubic yards (40 m3 to 76.5 m3) $22.50 101 to 1,000 cubic yards (77.2 m3 to 764.6 m3) - $22.50 for the first 100 cubic yards plus $10.50 for each additional 100 cubic yards for fraction thereof. 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards (765.3 m3 to 7645.5 m3) - $117.00 for the first 1,000 cubic yards plus $9.00 for each additional 1,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards (7646.3 m3 to 76455 m3) - $198.00 for the first 10,000 cubic yards (7645.5 m3), plus $40.30 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 100,001 cubic yards or more (76456 m3) - $562.50 for the first 100,000 cubic yards, plus $22.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. Other Inspections and Fees: 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours $30.00 (minimum charge - two hours) * *per hour 2. Reinspection fees assess under provisions of Section 108.8 $30.00 * *per hour 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated (minimum charge - one -half hour) $30.00 * *per hour * The fee for a grading permit authorizing additional work to that under a valid permit shall be the difference between the fee paid for the original permit and the fee shown for the entire project. ** Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved. 7 • Fee Structure • EXHIBIT C ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FEES Based on square footage: 0.60 per sq ft for interior 0.30 per sq ft for exterior Minimum: $2,500.00 Maximum: $4,000.00 • • • EXHIBIT D PERMIT SURCHARGE Subdivision 1. Computation. To defray the costs of administering sections 16B.59 to 16B.73, a surcharge in imposed on all permits issued by municipalities in connection with the construction of or addition of alteration to buildings and equipment or appurtenances after June 30, 1971, as follows: If the fee for the permit issued is fixed in amount the surcharge is equivalent to one -half mill (.0005) of the fee or 50 cents, whichever amount is greater. For all other permits, the surcharge is as follows: (1) if the valuation of the structure, addition, or alteration is $1,000,000 or less, the surcharge is equivalent to one -half mill (.0005) of the valuation of the structure, addition, or alteration; (2) if the valuation is greater than $1;000,000, the surcharge is $500 plus two - fifths mill (.0004) of the value between $1,000,000 and $2,000,000; (3) if the valuation is greater than $2,000,000 the surcharge is $900 plus three- tenths mill (.0003) of the value between $2,000,000 and $3,000,000; (4) if the valuation is greater than $3,000,000 the surcharge is $1,200 plus one -fifth mill (.0002) of the value between $3,000,000 and $4,000,000; (5) if the valuation is greater than $4,000,000 the surcharge is $1,400 plus one -tenth mill (.0001) of the value between $4,000,000 and $5,000,000; and (6) if the valuation exceeds $5,000,000, the surcharge is $1,500 plus one - twentieth mill (.00005) of the value that exceeds $5,000,000. • 9 • EXHIBIT E PLUMBING AND HEATING PERMITS Plumbing Permits A. The charge shall be Five Dollars ($5.00) for each plumbing fixture, device or connection to the sewer or plumbing system, with a minimum charge of Fifteen Dollars ($15.00) B. For any alteration, repair or extension to an existing plumbing system, where the work is of such a nature that the permit fee charge cannot be determined from the above schedule, the permit fee shall be Thirty Dollars ($30.00) first Five - hundred ($500.00) or fraction thereof, plus Fifteen Dollars ($15.00) for each additional Five - hundred Dollars ($500.00) or fraction thereof of the total market value of such alteration, repair or extension. 2. Mechanical Permits 1 - I. a- • - .•-• •w •. •- w - • !• <. % the following' - Main Gas line piping - Gas Dryer - Furnace - Gas Stove - Air conditioner - General Sheet Metal - Boiler - Duct work - Air Exchanger - Miscellaneous Mechanical Fixtures - Fireplace - Pool Heater - Unit heater A minimum charge of twenty dollars ($20.00) for fireplaces. The charge for commercial, industrial or institutional building shall be: Two percent (2 %) of the total cost of labor and materials of the heating, ventilation and air conditioning work to be completed. Work commenced without first obtaining a permit shall be charged an investigative fee equal to permit fees. • 10 • EXHIBIT F TRANSIENT SALES A. The following fees for Transient Sales - Conditional Use Permits are: Application Form $ 5.00 Transient Sales License Base Fee $75.00 B. The following fees are additional time period fees: Per day $10.00 Per week $30.00 Per month $60.00 Per year $150.00 C. The following fees are to be deducted from the Conditional Use Permit fee if granted: Cost of Application Form $ 5.00 D. These fees shall become effective on approval by the City Council of this resolution. 11 EXHIBIT G WATER UTILITY BILLING Water Permit Fees Service / Connection $55.00 Tapping Main $50.00 Disconnection Requests $20.00 Inspections (All) $20.00 Service Charges Testing Up to 2" Meters $25.00 Up to 3" Meters $30.00 Up to 4" Meters $35.00 Up to 6" Meters $40.00 Violation Penalties -- Shut-off $25.00 Water Meter Deposit 5/8" Meter $276.00 Special and other sizes Cost Plus Handling (These Rates are Subject to Tax) Unit Connection Charges Residential $2,800.00 Non Per REC $2,800.00 Water Usage Rates Billed Quarterly $15.00 $1.50 / 1000 gallons Minimum Per Quarter $15.00 Penalty/Late Payment 10t, 12 • CENTERVLLLE RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARK FACLLTTY USAGE FEES RESIDENTS, NON- PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS Security Deposit $100.00 * Concession Facility Fee . $25.00 ** Field Rental Fee waived. Lighting Fee N/A Key Fee , $20.00 $15.00 refunded when key is returned NON- RESIDENTS Security Deposit $100.00 * Concession Facility Fee $150,00 per tournament Field Rental Fee $100.00 per field Lighting Fee N/A Key Fee $20.00 315.00 refunded when key is returned * If fields and facilities are left in good condition and if all trash is picked up, the security deposit will be refunded. If these conditions are not met, repairs and or cleanup costs will be deducted from the security deposit. The security deposit must be submitted with the application. ** Per event or per season-for youth leagues. 13 RESOLUTION 98 -03 APPOINTING A RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY AND ASSIGNING DUTIES WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 13.02, Subdivision 16, as amended, requires the City of Centerville appoint one person as the Responsible Authority to administer the requirements for collection, storage, use and dissemination of data on individuals, within the City, and WHEREAS, the City of Centerville City Council shares concern expressed by the legislature on the responsible use of all City data and wishes to satisfy this concern by appointing an administratively qualified Responsible Authority as required under the statute. BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Centerville appoints Jim March as the Responsible Authority for the purposes of meeting all requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, as amended, and with rules as lawfully promulgated by the Commission of Administration as published in Chapter 105 of the Minnesota Code of Agency Rules. FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, the Responsible Authority shall require the requesting party to pay the actual cost of making, certifying and compiling copies and of preparing summary data. ADOPTED BY CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL ON THIS 14 DAY OF JANUARY, 1998. Torn Wilharber, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk 1997 (UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, VOLUME 1 of a building or structure prior to the completion of the entire build- ing or structure. 109.5 Posting. The certificate of occupancy shall be posted in a conspicuous place on the premises and shall not be removed except by the building official. 109.6 Revocation. The building official may, in writing, suspend or revoke a certificate of occupancy issued under the provisions of this code whenever the certificate is issued in error, or on the basis of incorrect information supplied, or when it is determined that the building or structure or portion thereof is in violation of any ordi- nance or regulation or any of the provisions of this code. TABLE 1-A--BUILDING PERMIT FEES TOTAL VALUATION FEE . 51.00 :o 5500.00 523.50 5501.00 to 52.000.00 $23.50 for the first 5500.00 plus 53.05 for each additional 5100.00. or fraction thereof, to and including 52,000.00 52.001.00 to 5 569.25 for the first 52.000.00 plus $14.00 for each additional 51.000.00. or fraction thereof, to and including 5 5,000.00 525,001.00 to 550.000.00 5391.25 for the first 525,000.00 plus 510.10 for each additional 51,000.00. or fraction thereof. to and including 550.000.00 $50,001.00 to 5100,000.00 5643.75 for the fast 550,000.00 plus 57.00 for each additional 51.000.00, or fraction thereof. to and including 5100,000.00 $100.001.00 to 5500,000.00 $993.75 for the first 5100,000.00 plus 55.60 for each additional 51.000.00, or fraction thereof. to and including 5500.000.00 5500.001.00 to 51.000,000.00 53.233.75 for the first $500.000.00 plus 54.75 for each additional 51.000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including 51.000.000.00 51.000,001.00 and up 55,608.75 for the first 51,000,000.00 plus 53.65 for each additional 51,000.00, or fraction thereof Other Inspections and Fes: I. Inspections outside of normal business hours 547.00 per hours (minimum charge-two hours) 2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of Section 305.8 547.00 per hours 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated 547.00 per hood (minimum charge —one -half hour) 4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to plans 547.00 per hour (minimum charge— one -half hour) 5. For use of outside consultants for plan checking and inspections, or both Actual costs= lOr the Total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment. hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved. ' costs include administrative and overhead costs. ■ ' 1997'UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, VOLUME 1 TABLE A- 33- A-- GRADING PLAN REVIEW FEES 50 cubic yards (382 m or less No fee I 51 to 100 cubic yards (40 m to 76.5 m 523.50 101 to 1.000 cubic yards (77.2 m to 764.6 m 37.00 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards (765.3 m to 7645.5 m 3) 4925 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards (7646.3 m to 76 455 m -$4925 for the first 10,000 cubic yards (7645.5 m plus 524.50 for each additional 10,000 yards (76455 m or fraction thereof. I 100.001 to 200,000 cubic yards (76 456 m to 152 911 m for the first 100,000 cubic yards (76 455 m plus 51325 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards (76455 m or fraction thereof. 200,001 cubic yards (152 912 m or more - 540225 for the first 200,000 cubic yards (152 911 m plus 5725 for each addi- tional 10,000 cubic yards (7645.5 m or fraction thereof. Other Fees: I Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved plans 550.50 per hour' (minimum charge - one -half hour) Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved. TABLE A - 33 - GRADING PERMIT FEESI 50 cubic yards (38.2 m or less $2350 51. to 100 cubic yards (40 m to 76.5 m 37.00 101 to 1,000 cubic yards (77.2 m to 764.6 m 537.00 for the first 100 cubic yards (76.5 m plus 517.50 for each additional 100 cubic yards (76.5 m or fraction thereof. I 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards (765.3 m to 7645.5 m $194.50 for the first 1,000 cubic yards (764.6 m plus 514.50 for each additional 1,000 cubic yards (764.6 m or fraction thereof. I 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards (7646.3 m to 76 455 m - 5325.00 for the first 10,000 cubic yards (7645.5 m plus 566.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards (7645.5 m or fraction thereof. 100,001 cubic yards (76 456 5919.00 fortbe first 100,000 cubic yards (76 455 m plus 53650 for each addition- al 10,000 cubic yards (7645.5 m or fraction thereof. Other Inspections and Fees 1 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours 550.50 per hour (minimum charge --two hours) 2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of Section 108.8 550.50 per hour 3. inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated $5050 per hour (minimum charge - one -half hour) 1 Thsfeefior a grading permit authorizing additional work to that under a valid permit shall be the difference between the fee paid for the original permit and the fee shown for the entire project. 2 0r the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved. . , . . , 1999 PERMIT FEES city at Centerville TOTAL PERMIT FLAN CHECK STATE VALUATION FEE FEE SURCHARGE 111111$500.00'- ,,,,,, 523.50 5152$ ,,, ..... .. ... .................. ......... ......................... 5800,00 $26.55 $17.26 $0.50 $70E00 GHHHHiiii ....... .............. 529Z0--______:- ..................... $1924 $0.50 ..... $800.00 $32.65 $21.22 $0.50 $900.00:::::"""""::]il'$.35.70 $1,000.00 $38.75 $25.19 50,50 $1100,00;;;;;;;;;;;;;:::::;;::::;:;;;;;;;141.:40: ..... ..................................................... ..... $055 ............................................................................... ................. ..................... ............................................................................................... $1,200.00 $44.85 $29.15 $0.60 . $r1i300.00"""'"""'"'""'"'" .... ...................................... ........ .... :: $1,400.00 • $50.95 $33.12 $0.70 .. .... Stsoe.po ... : . $454M0F .......... ................................. .. „40,75m:ii 51,600.00 $57.05 $37.08 $0.80 .H:$1x000 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::$60.10:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::W7 $M""=": 51,300,00 $83.15 $41.05 $0.90 $14900 00 .. „„ ........ ...................................................................... $2,000.00 ... $89.25 $45.01 $1.00 ......... ""'.'.'E!!!!!E!!:12:$4;25:z In::!! .... . .... . .. . .. ... ............. ..... iiiiiIii!ilmiliiiinimiii,Hfl $4,000.00 586.30 $56.10 $2.00 55,000100 .. ... ............. ......................................................... ........ ... .. .............. ;.:Ei!ilii;iii::::::iiii:$2,50;;;! $6,000.00 $114.30 $74.30 $3.00 $7;000'.00±:iiiiiHiiiiiiiiiiiiiii,;ii ...... $12a3011HH:::::::::::::::::::::::: $3.40 53 50EJ: 58,000.00 $142.30 $92.50 54.00 1 .$9,000.00 !!' $156,30iY:HH HE;E:ii Mi! $10,000.00 $170.30 $110.70 $5.00 $1 ....... ................................................................ 5119.80 55.50 $12,000.00 $198.30 $128.90 58.00 $13.000.0O 5212.30 ........................................................................................................ $14,000.00 5226.30 $147.10 $7.00 $15;000j00 :i:iH H!1 iIN! ... .... .. .............. :'HHE:::.±'HL'::':::$156,20:::::HEHHE::!::::::::::47:::50.......::,„ $16,000.00 $254.30 $165.30 $8.00 Y:$17:•,000,00 $268.30 $174.40 :FHHHEE::$8...50 : ...... :II 513,000,00 $282.30 $183.50 $9.00 H:$19A00oci: .......... , .. 529 5192.60 ... :5ziiHdh .. .. .. ......... .... H $20,000.00 $310.30 $201.70 $10.00 1 1 $24000.00:::: :::: $324.30 _ ......... ._ 510.50 :: $22,000.00 $338.30 $219.90 $11.00 $23 000 Ott :: $35230 ::: $329 ; :::: $24,000.00 $366.30 $238.10 $12.00 $26,000.00 $401.35 $260.88 $13.00 :::$27A00:00":"'"" _ :::: 5415:35 $269.98 $13 50 $28,000.00 $429.35 $279.08 $14.00 $29;000 00 ::: :::: $443:35 _ $288:18 • $14.50 $30,000.00 $457.35 5297.28 $15.00 531,000.00 $47t35 $306.38 $1&50 :::: $32,000.00 $485,35 $315.48 $16.00 533;000:00:::: :::: $499.35 $324 :58 $16.50 :::::: $34,000.00 $513.35 $333.68 $17.00 $342 $17.50 $36,000.00 $541.35 $351.88 518 .00 537;000.00 $555435 $ 360.9$ ..._... $38,000.00 $569.35 $370.08 $19.00 $39,001/013...... • $583.35. $379.18 ........ $1'9 50 ::::::: $40,000.00 $597.35 $388.28 $20.00 $611,35 $397.38 :::: $42,000.00 $625.35 $406.48 521.00 -543,000.00 ". "' 5639.35 5415. 42E50- $44,000.00 $653.35 $424.68 $22.00 $45;000 00 $667 :35 ::::$433 $46,000.00 $681.35 $442.88 $23.00 �- 000.00 $69 .35 $451.98 523.50' 4�y $48,000,00 $709.35 $461,08 $24,00 49;000 00 5723.35 $ 7018 $24 50 $50,000,00 5737.35 $479.28 $25.00 $51;000 .00 :::::: $650.75 $422 99 $25.50;' 552, 000.00 $657.75 5427.54 $26.00 $53.000 00 $664.75 $43209 $54,000.00 $671.75 $436 64 $27.00 55 000 00 ::: $678,75 $441 19 .::::: $27.50; $56,000.00 $685.75 $445.74 $28.00 $57,000.00 $692.75 $58,000.00 $699,75 $454.84 $29.00 $59,000 00 $706,75: $459.39 560,000.00 $713.75 $463.94 $30.00 561,000.00 3720,75! 5468.49 $30.50 $82,000.00 $727.75 $473.04 $31.00 $63000 00 :::: "' $73�a5 $�77.� :::: $31x50 $64,000.00 $741.75 $482.14 $32.00 S;BOfF;00 $74� $4�S E9 "`' " $32.50 $b6,000.00 $755.75 $491.24 $33.00 �7�OOB;OQ $7S2Z5 __. $495.79 ::: $33y50 _ ::: X68,000.00 $769.75 $500.34 $34.00 $69 000.00 $776x75 _. ::$495 i9 ;;; ��50 _ $70,000.00 $769.75 $500.34 $35.00 $7'[�OOOsQO $77S 75 $504.89 :::::: $3550 .::: $72,000.00 $783.75 $509.44 $35.00 $73 000.0(1:::. $79€x;75 $5:1399 .:::: _. ::: $35:50: $74,000.00 $797.75 $518.54 $37.00 $75x004,00 ;X804':75 X523.09 ': $37 50 $76,000.00 $811.75 $527.64 $38.00 $770OOOiI $8'875 ,$532:1'?...._..._ _....... $3850: '! $78,000.00 $825.75 $536.74 $39.00 $79 OOD 0:0 ..... $832:5 $5}1:29 $39850..... $80,600.00 $539.75 $545.84 $40.00 �8't4C�' 00 :::: $84S'75 $s��t.39 $4050......... $82,000.00 $853.75 $554.94 $41.00 $$3;000 00:::::: $8SB:75 $559.49 $41;50" ;'" Q84,000.00 $857.75 $564.04 $42.00 �8500O.O�i ... _.. $874x75 $ao8 � $4250:: ::: W36,000.00 $881.75 $573.14 $43.00 7j004.00 $888:7:5 $377.€9 $43.50:. $88,000.00 $895.75 $582.24 $44.00 ;S29OOOi 00 ,,, $902.7 $�SS.79 '' ,; .SQ $?O,D00:00 $909.75 $591.34 $45.00 $'?1;000 00 is $916.7 $$ 5.89 �'S 50 ': $92,000.00 $923.75 $600.44 $46A0 a?�30OO.OD 3930.75 $Sa.4.� $45.50 :: $94,000,00 $937.75 $609.54 $47.00 $95 000.00 $9 #4.75 is $514.09 '' " "' $'47.50" "' $ °6,000.00 $951,75 $618.64 $48.00 $97000 DO ' $958.75: $S?3.19 - $48:0 598,000.00 $965.75 $627.74 $49.00 4gg000,DD = $972.i��! $5.32.29 $49.5U -, ;;; $100,000.00 $979.75 $b36.84 $50.00 $101';000.00 " $?8 &.75 $b4'1.39 "$50.50: $102,000.00 $993.75 $645.94 $51.00 $1�J3 000.00 3,1,000:75 $650.x9 $51:50::::! $104,000.00 $1,007.75 $b33.04 $52.00 �1II�,i�00.00:: $1,014�fi $o��.�_.. �52�50. :: $100,000.00 $1,021.75 $8$4.14 $53.00 b1Ci7,Q0000_... _...... $1;02875 ........ ...._ $5350 $108,000.00 $1,035.75 $673.24 $54.00 $1 000 00 ," ;'; X9,042:75 $S77 7� _.::: $54 $10,000.00 $1,D49.i5 $582.34 $85.00 �31:1yd309D0...... _. ...__.....�71�Oa$���$5.�::::::: $555f3 $1'i2,000.00 $1,DS3.75 $591.44 $5b.00 $i �y000 Ofl .::: - ::: �1,t�7075 : - :::$S� <� .::::: $565D $1'i4,000.D0 $1,077.75 $700.54 $57.00 I ��; ; 0.00_.. $4,0$4�t� $7fl�;D9......... X57:30 $11S,ODOAO $1,091.75 $709.64 $58.00 � �1'�i0000fl $�1,O�S�75 ......... $7:'�41� ._.::: $5$5Ci $118,OOD,00 $7,105.75 $718.74 $59.fl0 $:119 ADD DD ::: $'x,112:75 ; 723 29 .:::: ° 50' $'i2�J,000.00 $1,119.75 $727.84 $SOHO $121Ot3D.Ofl ; �9,.12£��75 _... �732.3� .:.: �SOr5�1 $122,OOD.O�J $1,133.75 $738.94 $S1.OD �;.�� i�Ofl fl� ..::: $'i,'1� is ......... $7�1 � ......... _._.... �'f 513:: . . X124,000.00 $1,147.75 $74S.D4 $82.00 y {��t���.fl� '.:: _ ':.$'�.��4ai:�J ................. �l��:�J�J' �i3�.50..... :�i26,OD0.0u $1,161.73 $755.94 $63.00 _. 3n�r �uO.flG -: �'�;1S8rt5 __....... $759.x...... _ �3,a0 =i $28,0OO.OD $1,475.75 $754.24 $fi400 =29.OD000 -::: ,::::�'1,'�82::�5 $7b$.7� ;; $84:50..._.__. $�3D,OOD.00 $1,189.75 $773.34 $83.00 331�C'�0 00 " ,,, �'1,195�7� $�77.� , : $S5;5D _.. $132 000,00 $1,203.78 $782.44 $58.00 �1OOO.DD ;: '�1,t10;75 $�8fi.9° $fic 50 . '' � �.3400D.00 $1,217.73 $791.54 $87.00 31 .� 000.00 ': `.�'l,224��� $79f.0° $b7.50! ai3b,OD0A0 $1,231.75 $$OD.64 $68.D0 � t?'�ru.00 :$1,230.�� $8p�.1° $58.50 ai38,00D,G0 $1,245.75 $8D9.74 $b9.D0 �13�?OD0.00 ;! �1,252.7� $8�?�.29 '' $69.5D .." �40,0OO.OD $1,259.75 $818.84 $iO.DD ::= 11,G�00.00 ' $823.39 ' $70.50: i S ?= 12,DOOAO $1,273.75 $827.94. $71.00 _ _ _... __ 514:4G0,00 $1,280.7.5 $832.4a $71,50 ',GDGAO $1,287.75 $837.04 $72.00 I + �'�4S 000.00,. _ .::::: $�,29�3'1.a :::. $541.59 .:.:: X2:50 $146,000.00 $1,301.75 $846.14 $73.00 $1���OO.no:: �a,�s�� $$5t� 69 3i�o $148,004.00 $1,315.75 $855.24 $74.00 $�fj9i�00 00 ' '; $7,3�2'�5 $8 79 374 ;50 $150,000AO $1,329.75 $854.34 $75.00 5159'1iI04 00 ':' 'x'1,336:75 $588; 9 :.;,;: �?3 5fl $152,000.00 $1,343.75 $873.44 $78.00 X153 {00,00 : �'l,�a 75 _ :::: �87�,99 X75.50 $134,0OO.Ofl $1,357.75 $882.51 $77.00 a 55�0.i10_ ;; $'i;� ?5 _ _......... _ ._..$$87.t� ':'` �775ai $;35,000.00 $1,371.iv $891.64 $78.00 �t�: �,��;i300.00 $1;378:5 ..... _.... X895.19 " "" "$78;50:: $158,000,00 $1,385.75 $900.14 $79.00 �;��0001)0 �'i,3�2r$ � °���9 ;; ;: �7�5�' $1EO,OOfl,flO $1,399.75 $909.84 $80.00 �'!o1D00.Ofl:': "�'i;4�6:,75 _.. $91,39 ,.::: O.SO::. $152,000.00 $1,413.73 $918.94 $8'1.00 83£3�3fl0�3� �1,4�Or5 $92;149 $8.1:50':` "a7S4,040.0 $1,427.75 $ $82.00 $1So,OD0.00 $1,441.75 $937.14 $83.00 ��fS7 ��fl 00 .; 5'i,4�8:t;$ $��?9.59 X83.50 ,' $1S$,000.00 $1,455.75 $945.24 $54.00 X1:9; ��3 00 ';$'1, 2.75 �9�.i9 $84,50'; ,' �170,OG0.00 _... $1,469.73 $955.34 _ _. $85.00.......... ��i, ';$1,476:15 $5 .89 '; �5,5c�' $172,000.00 $1,483.75 $964.44 $88.00 �;;5 X0.00 $1,i90:r5 $968.£'9 X5.50'; 5174,D00.00 $1,497.75 $ °73.54 $87.00 �1ia'��0.00 S'i,47� $9%8,D9 $87.5D $175,000.00 $1,811.75 $982.64 $8$,00 __ �',ii uC0.00 i$1 s�l$:75 $9$7.x9 $88,5a , ;!' 5178,OGOAO $1,525.75 $991.74 $89.00 __ .. _ _ __ _ _. _. __ 5 , � 9ti�0.00 i ;$9,532:75. $995.29 $E9.5�1:' .......... S; "x0,000.00 _ $1,000.84 _ $90.00..__._.. _ ___ 5��;,;u''{l0.00 $'1,VdS.'f$! i $1 G.�5.39 X90.50 5182 000.00 $1,553.75 $1,009 Q4 $91.00 ,�'��,�0.00 $1,560.75 ! $1,i7'id,49 X91.50 ' ' $184,000.00 $1,567.75 $1,019.04 $92.00 $385;000:00...... $1,574.75 $1;(#23:59 $92:50........... $185,000.00 $1,581.75 $1,028.14 $93.00 $187,000.00 $1,588.75 $1,032.69 $93.50 $188,000.00 $1,595.75 $1,037.24 $94.00 $:189 II00=00....... ... .._ $1;b�l2i75 ... - .::::. .$9:;04'x:79 $94 50 ......_ $190,000.00 $1,609.75 $1,046.34 $95.00 $191'(000:00...... _ ........ $1;6'16:75 $1:;:050x89 X5:50 $192,000.00 $1,623.75 $1,055,44 $96.00 $193£100J0....... _..... $'1;60:'75 $1t359�� $ °6':50 $194,000.00 $1,637.75 $1,064,54 $97.00 � $'x;35 €IOO 04 X1,644:75 $1 II69x09 $J7 50 ;; $196,000.00 $1,651.75 $1,073,64 $98.00 $1�7�000 0(1....... $'i,65875 �1t178x'19 $?8:50 $198,000.00 $1,665.75 $1,082.74 $99.00 $1�. QOO;aO .:: "'x'1,672:75 _..... $9: i?87.29 :: $99:50....... $200,000.00 $1,679,75 $1,091,84 $100.00 I SCHEDULE 1 -11 FOR LUAIP SUFI PEf1510IV PLAN$ iiarc 9R[ W ♦x:w 1?Y• ♦ FiretiElaerf R.lie/ /s.�rtiatinn of CnrmnW FSe P. &! CeufrM Amla SCI R:DULE 1 l.myamrn alMxfir efrttulaswian•rn ryevial LJlari A.RTI )LerYm aamia 6r all mrS. bccJ Ontleie Jeo n rm•n v .xu.e Ne Je{arpma rn�M�n.. 1 l J a 3 R 1 Tr Ve Mnf IMm Tn Je nJ of 1'i» Fn Nano Ap' F .Ike Y.an rVOw A¢ruJ Yem AV'J+e M+wt Srniva fiafiilin Fervi¢c ISUM1rIrn Allrie A? I!.JU�59 UI.M -N •c.. 5r+ _ M�[1�r.bR ] Am.JA UI -AJ�M S.._J + 5-T Rua Rrel I :%.(4r -A1 OlbnsSv!5 r. I n.a ✓ ry.;urd 0.utrrN IM1f1.��R1 UI -IW -At ] ).�� r +*+• hl+s „rr n.msT a.ar.91 a 1_m 9 r9,m n R�¢ R.A�n !W�WNy nl.8ogi v t1...r 1. ».:n - Rnemar'i:em r% Nrn -f�l 01 -Gn'M 1^.. 1 _..� + %n•lur. \4clucl r4¢ -AJ.RS OI.Ahr -NV Ic .:.n., r. _.- • PnJm,M1viJ SS�R"�L III.Ln'll 2 I xt n Ir.]o •, rn��n��. tn.r.. rn Fr.iJ rll Ar + _ r. s. i. r imLLi. Mn rAwnw.it r11.L�A> V _ _ n n I_ u+arJ. Nrvin Ir1.R.:.(.5 111 -Ai -41 a I'..•a s 1+99n �� Pxrvv.$NUl ELJG.FCI UI -Aw-9n f r97n 4 .to � Frai W.lA� uI�S'rNl OI -brrAt w ). I I is FrcnM1 Tnm T.Arw.SU VI -AJ��M 1... 1 ..q .n CuJrtr. irJJ II�!\rfiA UI�N.w -T .-]>. la r cr... hm Irvin -ss I nl.0 -m - . _r. - L,u .x to „sr.. rarr r v.. �.+ nLN....et r..m r r. ,r. I. xyr ClnsarFF.�r _)�WN• IIIJrn91 I. _. ♦ 9 rA _r V:nilJ. fleet II�Ary.�l rll�LniS r _ 1. .:. 9 n _: IaW Vhuh PaNr �r \h. -SV UI -ln.¢5 ,.,L 1. Yi,r±9 _ Le. irnr UI�nYr -51 I UI -nrn�M r T..'.n I. +.,_, � \kni+AU \'e 4f>�'.FI u13RA5 I J!I[.t a � - J , _l \4CNC CaJry OLnrrNl VI�M91 _ I.�a. s i +� .+ \Ii�N.c. Term II_.Aru�3V UI- Ar�91_ rr �•. .,m _ \4v. P•n W.Lnfil UI�0.v�4+ 1]�l e I. u.nn. arr n.nw�st m- nr..as r ,,n r. A.m ¢ r.r �,..c,M ,.c,..w of -b.. +A _ _ ��.Nr.r.. rb...,...r ILSGr.t+ m.ar.al_ a-�I I -• nrrm dm Iu.MS]I nLRG._AS a :rrn tl fi x hRrvn Am UI -Ae� +9 al -LnAt ry 7t f_4 19 'a �� Rr.imry \6te !I -:1w. r- U1�8ntJ � I+ l.'YT I. �+ !•! �+ rzeimr. RnA,IJ IA. \la+�.: I I I ( rr1.AJ�� � �r 1 . e,.rtre.,n m.,a , aJw.sn m -a..a 1 a. a +m A..IaW. RmJv J.. \Lv.:: nl.Aw..¢S I , \.•n bnH' UI�F.F3 UI�AY -T a r + I +to tn, �r�lr. art +. rk Atli+ _ rll.hr♦A._ a �.. � . �t ¢u1. R.Aan V_anr� rIl�Aly -n . nn �' 'a 1. \hn' S1� \LV �n_ UI�Aw.nl ' a a --n - ]rcr.�. \m +V�M1�i3 UI�8mY5 + ..< Ic.y » ,..rya Anin Y3�brW II -FJ�M +, + ro .. hum'.• Tman�c :I -IAA +4 UI�N.•r.A•1 n � �.• - n. -. i. v'hi .Jlm _r- AU� rrl_rlcr.AA •+ _.. _ ..'.A +v ilc�ll ^a• VS -Ftl.n: V Au -91 t. 'M a.. T'.I Tim __ M1lnh) rl Au..l r. .. - -. (r - I I I I _ t. r T. ul ..f lkurr.J I•.rea.m r...Nr a la:,u,...n. — a o r rn.r FuV \..W � u o r..,..„ n �.. rr•r. Ir. �.r .. -,a I,.nmm — _ .. r T.. .ra..,.r ^.r., ..wJrLxnJ.n n.,,..]. n.. r.Y �. rr __ n.rY , ......J,.M.r r �♦.,r�a,.. •m.rhaol<mw vr..r+.ualr.m .., �...L.nlir. r�cm „m rw�r....;r. m��Mrer.rry w.w<... .. „ � al�n;e. •.♦ .� .,,x.n.alkm,•m�.nr.ra of mrr..ar i�nwcmrtr„swa,l.•.ry r.0 � unlc �rJ nn up.�J P'kr•w'. a.W rnrrnr Fxlw �n urluml nap Yee sslNWaa mu.r Ml..p�aN Ur Yr(rn cev. - •I Ran A4.urleacM1.car $CNEOULE 11 Baelion I cm...rmm al sre..,w Alwape tu�eai.., ' Ltimnm�iun of Rol ^nd Nu Nvn a+ oY ReamFn ]I, 199x /svnu U:cemMJL 1931 li LrtDalJ gnjanl lsuev b PxemA JI.IWA • Atimma Suu NJ 5)n4 6. Apa�npl CuaiMtim 1R.f41 • Fudriim uY Wr�um _ d Iv.�vwn Innme I.w JSa • RwIV.J Gaimlhav+l 0 [ Ihuliml Gairslluss55 _ 0 A 6L w'ne 0 Toul 23 Dn O3R quiauJ gvuv p.¢ Imm fAemda +Jl.elm..'p.11i¢ I � lia it J 1 ISSRJAI R.iceu�l P�I+axmm� Iha� ml of me e i�ia¢ s R (IYaT terctiu 1 A j. AJnlinfvalivv S JAl Tatl IS ]JA gyaul Anew w ml N>m(liv> I�onv liw Jl Ss I355'W Seep F +ai.�,d .5'..#�..2wF.nl n Mn....e,.Jl. lvvs pn.jxlN �wu (limb 6f I355 /WI McruJ lyplin lli¢B..kIMJC II ]5 919.19) Supu(h6cip R.man tiw]fom li¢61 81 3]6X5! OL. �s.TeviucJ �Supl.e OGe.e.Wla..I ifDF'i Snmsl hu..�...vin of A/uu[IpJ ('umrburvwr ( ✓Yvplul Nmml C[m (Iirt C. 54MYe I I 95 IM 151 CabWakJ hmnamu.a E.ynx 1115 551) �' t Wmbu Sue AiJ S SI ]M m eY liie x S SJ M1XS TOUT I $WVwti.m IIS 11[1!1 MauiPl CaanbuimXlirt 9, p'm IOmuae 111 135 1 100111 V f I (YI d 6mm[. Cmifi m mav[iPllry p[4ue A4 a� 1.194R, Ir d m.�bn. m [dmbuea ;, Jrt. $nma i Msmmue;ua 0 /A/wa+p�cmandvnm (J Q'l[;ar Taul 4am lirt C. 4[RJW[1 IJS 0 .Mrcn -vuiur u /CV {n� NcW R6cit' 0 <uLwnl CnYma3 Cu4me5 o[.[ Cwv Yaa Pna Yan Ew Y� 0 D TivaF D 4 Lnd inn L.Mmnl 0 x.10 0 Amnlviu�n Of R6ci1 xlr.� lii 0 of &�wllw �if uml 155 0 m�mJ e wm.aoaa.. r - las o tea: n Aananw Smr AiJ 5 U e. Sx of Lm 5 S U Tml 5alea[JOm 1]S 0 AWVCiPI CwaMwOV 185 0 lu n « I.Pe... �R[[ �I.� aa.:[i� +mm Yam �...I walr.mme:;P�u. RD.w AI�mL 199e ,rveecm mn,a.,aa.: a.. ('Wavluiur a /.Mrige [p�[id /�oJ he.a�e p�� xxder B C O E Scm ANi[ilvl 1(K u( Active NJ $wn Saapu Memlers peen¢ u ..v 199] �a n 3.0]J n y 1996 2P19 wa s� 1995 pr oaf uua Im]if a 1615 }m wpm [ sW f. l SI i�M Rme.1 ®.n B.w4 w� .w ' JSW OFSICER'S CFRTISIGTOY (Fenn ®n [[ POayJwl m eui[iPl [Ink on w hb[e AIp�T 1, 1998 ) e, Oe 016[ela of Ik Fv[6pxaa N[li[( Anwulim Wm Ibl 16 awogvelaip rthJWe Om[ brn P[yN in F uiwtlawe Y� Ve POnSfan D( A4m Sua CG69 TR, v8i [. Tk rvnaP amwa nlrv�ailaeb fimrtirp P[memh[ MW a�ia14J 4Y Ue Paa Ihwamf 15 SI H99 FWn.Lnea� In'eu M[ 4m matlialN in a[.oedarte ri1M1 Ih a.mpe mvua of n'ailable 6m�[ig u u mryM b� Minwm la+ y � �rc arerti ary Otw «tier a.[wmu00 [µ ml a[J as 1999 6, p.P.<aw rv �I a.rv[�e�.io..a s n . / ^ � 1 • ��. � � /llo Qq a _t�wcof�.�vnn �. 1 L X. -'- mrc " /� / cTSrucs aznncpnon 1 >m In, n a er l J l;l � 17.(1 I i l �.L �i.[J u. m�ml[m os[a ar w: nwi..� S[hJW[I¢Il bwn Cmmval Fi[<Pelicl 8[lie„AM000n On m il: '� I R.e N yenn m X, IS W 18 of S1NW[II. If 13 o�Ix d0a adpu�N nan[ipl [vmiavi ' n` Dni u.11 W�ix Ve ryaenigmaiciPl RJ. w ita rty ecyWUrla xINW W mvwg If Ue C[tiYwY0nuf0e !.}Cana Ju[Inxry W� Je IA -laxa hv[ Cem xmRJ ,v Ye trrttlu Rye ueivaN aN lirt 12 w IR rtDw� a rryuM mn[�pil cam�bwm l:atinYU Jep.['muyl mue[ iPl huN peu.larcmlui0n aµmai�go(4e imussw[RVpe i b�laua. I R.e aiu[RJ Jv 1yueJ�rnlJion ifrcVU J. ="l i7ici c� '1 � 7.. 1, i ,! � �1! �'l `� lll�(1(d � c ti � (4� e!t {�;�l�ill� 1, -�! - j2�i —3��z_ ,.P�,_... f (,a., Emim, , �... ... w.__ _.. w_ .�..._ _,,._,,,_ � .w_.. � �p..__�. _. _ aLL_- .�.�y._____._..,,_�. �' C C O d d O � — � R 9 � T � � C 2' r o ao p 'O s :� R r N r O d y C 7 ' y w 7 • � � � �', C Q w 67 N o r ''� w m E d' N ad � � o > °' d ' a `o � rn � � ; y m •_ �d�� O N C O 2 3� M A d +.. y C 1p d C � d O d L Q! � �+ V L � � t d ~ w � � .. c C U •� > �a � • LL � U ' p c = � 'fl tLq w LL V LL � C 0/ O d w O C F C � d � m U' C' N .� C7 FED � � i��� � '; WASTE MANAGEMENT 1 10050 Naples Street N.E. Blaine, MN Si449 1 -612- 890 -1100 1 -612- 783 -5477 Fax February 8, 1999 Ry -Chel Gaustad City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 RE: Customer Complaints The following is a list of customer service issues that we had during the month of January 1999. ADDRESS DATE ISSUE 1736 Center Street 01/29/99 Missed Collection In the case of a resident being missed on the route we collect the missed stop at the end of the route on Friday and/or the following Monday. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 612 - 483 -5444. Respectfully Submitted, � CJG� Ronald P. Gersdorf Municipal Marketing Manager Waste Management of MN A Dici ±inn of Wau'tn M.maFemene of Minnesota L �� � p ,C�,.�,,�C�/ V l���� 1880 `NlainStreet • Centervi!!e, M91( 55038 -� �sta6C�shed 1857 (612J 429 -3232 � jax (612J 429 -8629 Febraury 17, 1999 Current Resident 7037 Brian Court Centerville, MN 55038 Dear Resident: The City of Centerville has received a complaint that you allow your dog to deposit fecal matter on the road. This is in violation of Ordinance #24, Section XIII. Cleanup (please see attachment). At this time, the City is requesting you to cleanup the fecal matter. If complaints continue, it may be necessary to enforce Ordinance #24 and impose penalties provided under Section XV. Penalty. Please take actions in order to comply with this ordinance. If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at City Hall 429 -3232. Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk Enclosures fr 1� ` ' to V {ma tte 1880 Main Street • Centerville, MN 55038 Established 1857 (612) 429 -3232 • Fax (612) 429 -8629 Febraury 17, 1999 Current Resident 7203 Clear Ridge Centerville, MN 55038 Dear Resident: The City of Centerville has received a complaint that you allow your dog to deposit fecal matter on other property than your own. This is in violation of Ordinance #24, Section XIII. Cleanup (please see attachment). At this time, the City is requesting you to cleanup the fecal matter. If complaints continue, it may be necessary to enforce Ordinance #24 and impose penalties provided under Section XV. Penalty. Please take actions in order to comply with this ordinance. If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at City Hall 429 -3232. Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Ry-Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk Enclosures