Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-11-10 Packet Votkige Ar PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING AGENDA TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 1998 7:00 P.M. I. OPENING A. Roll Call II. PUBLIC HEARING (S) M. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES A. May 5, 1998 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes B. June 2, 1998 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes C. September 1, 1998 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes IV. APPEARANCES A. Mary Capra - EDC Minnesota Design Team Update V. ACTION ITEMS VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Consider Amendment to Ordinance #4 - Outbuildings - Saxton B. Consider Amendment to Ordinance #5 Discharge of Firearms - Table C. December Agenda Items VII. ADJOURN CITY OF CENTERVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MAY 5, 1998 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Centerville held its regularly scheduled meeting on Tuesday, May 5, 1998, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Chair Kathy Welk Linda Broussard Vickers John Buckbee ABSENT: Tina Vermeulen Al LaMotte STAFF: Jim March, Administrator Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk Paul Palzer, Public Works Director /Building Official CALL TO ORDER Chair Kathy Welk called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING (S) Joyce Stevens - Lot Split Ms. Joyce Stevens -Green (7007 20th Avenue) briefed the Commission on the reason for a lot split request. Ms. Green explained a business owner voiced an interest in purchasing the pole style building located on her property. The business owner planned to house equipment in the pole building. Furthermore, the business owner is aware the pole building is located within the floodplain. In addition, the business owner planned to purchase the pole building and house. However, the business owner will not be in a financial position until a later date. Ms. Broussard- Vickers questioned the property zoning classification. Mr. March noted the property is in Bi Commercial. Mr. March added, Ordinance #33. FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE. SECTION 7 0 SUBDIVISIONS states, "No land h:1 •- ••ivi•-• whi i h -le un i -.1- • • it f•r r- .n • l...in• in_. -. - - •r -in -.- - -r ••1 •r tr a ment faciliti s A11 to wi hin he flood plain districts shall conta a building site at or above the Regulatory Flood protect Elevation A subd s h ave water an 1 w.•- •' ..sal f.ilitie .m.. wi h h- •r.vi i• of this Ordinance and have road access both to the subdivision and to the individual building sites no lower than one foot below the 1. • Fi... • - i•. 1 -v. i.e. " Mr. Palzer added, a property owner can fill the flood plain, but not in the floodway. In addition, each proposed property must have a buildable site, in the case reconstruction is needed. If the current building is 51% destroyed, the proposed lot must have an area outside of the flood way to build another building. The city cannot issue a building permit to reconstruct the existing building if it is destroyed by 51% or more. Chair Welk confirmed the existing building is in the flood way. Public Hearing closed at 7:20 p.m. Mr. Palzer noted city ordinances require new structures be two feet above flood plain elevations. Mr. March said the legal council noted the subdivision can be approved with an approved variance. Mr. Buckbee questioned Staff if the business owner considered purchasing parcel "A" with parcel "B." Ms. Green replied selling the property as a whole is too financially restricting for the proposed business owner at this time. Gerald Rehbein - MUSA Swap Mr. March gave a brief overview of the different MUSA dedicated phases and he noted the request to relocate MUSA from the property on the north east corner of the city to the property located south of Main Street and west of 20th Avenue. Also, Mr. March updated the Commission on the City's Comprehensive Plan and its MUSA designation areas. Mr. March added, the proposed MUSA Swap would afford the city and property owner to develop the strip of land along 20th Avenue. Also, the proposed property is not slated for MUSA until year 2001. Chair Welk inquired about comments from the Metropolitan Council. Mr. March commented the best way to address the MUSA shortage on 20th Avenue is to switch the MUSA properties. Councilmember Helmbrecht questioned Mr. March about requesting a Comprehensive Plan amendment from the Metropolitan Council. Mr. March replied the City is not required to file a formal Comprehensive Plan Amendment. However, the City will need to inform the Council that a "House Keeping Amendment" will need to be completed. 2 Chair Welk questioned the audience for comments in regard to the MUSA request. The Planning Commission heard no comment from the audience. Public Hearing closed at 7:24 p.m. Bill Bisek - Variance Mr. Bill Bisek (7098 Centerville Road) presented a plan to expand Kelly's Korner on the northeast corner of the building. Mr. Bisek noted the expansion will create an ADA entrance into the bar area, provide a larger kitchen and dinning area. Mr. March commented several variances have been issued in the downtown area. This appears to be because of non - conformance issues. Mr. March added, the addition will not be further north than the existing north wall. Ms. Brossard - Vickers questioned setting precedence. Mr. Palzer commented variances can be issued to bring a building to a less non - conforming building. Mr. Buckbee questioned Staff if the existing building was destroyed and then rebuilt would the building be within the required set backs. Mr. Palzer noted the County requires a 50' building set back from the center of County Road 14. The Planning Commission suggested waiting until the Design Team reports its findings to the City, prior to approval. Mr. March commented the Design Team will make recommendations to the City on linking trailways, providing downtown access. Chair Welk questioned Staff as to the Design Teams time line to report back to the City. Mr. March commented the Design Team should report back its findings by mid - September. Mr. Buckbee questioned Staff about the County's variance process. Mr. March said Anoka County has plans to widen Main Street. However, it may be in the City's best interest to develop its own way prior to that time. Also, Mr. March understood the City has planting power. Mr. Bisek noted zoning ordinance #4 needed to be changed to address the downtown area because of the unique layout and the age of the buildings. Mr. Buckbee commented the City needs to change the ordinances instead of the City granting variances. Public Hearing closed at 7:42 p.m. 3 Amendment to Ordinance 44A Chair Welk read aloud the public notice, the current ordinance and the proposed amended ordinance. Mr. March clarified the reason behind the ordinance amendment which was to eliminate pole buildings and address wood frame buildings. Essentially, one building constructed of brick may be worth $800,000 whereas, a building next to it may be constructed with wood frame material and worth $200,000. The taxing capacity is different due to the site and value of the building. Public Hearing closed at 7:46 p.m. APPEARANCES • Rooter Kolsted - Rezone and Vacate Property South of Main St. Mr. Kolsted reiterated he had met with the Planning Commission in March and his request was denied. Currently, Mr. Kolsted is requesting the Planning Commission to reconsider a bank at Main Street and Dupre Road. Furthermore, changes have been implemented to address the citizens' and the Commissions comments from the last hearing. Foremost, a sidewalk can be constructed from Dupre Road west to Progress Road, then north to Main Street. The sidewalk would address school children walking. Mr. Kolsted commented the property owners are willing to close on the land and commence building in the spring of 1999. Therefore, he requested the Planning Commission table the issue instead of denying the request. Chair Welk addressed traffic exiting onto Dupre Road. Mr. Buckbee noted the property is currently zoned R2 (Single Family Residential) and several new homes have been constructed on the adjacent property. Mr. March reiterated the city's position on spot zoning and the City's requirement to act on rezoning requests. Furthermore, Mr. March reported the city is in receipt of a 60 -day waiver form. Thus, no action is required from the Planning Mr. Jake Shoepe (7084 Dupre Road) stated he was opposed to the bank construction on the corner to the Eagle Pass Development. Mr. Shoepe also had concerns regarding the safety of school children that walk to the elementary school. Chair Welk noted receipt of a letter drafted by the Hammerick family. (Exhibit A) Ms. Roberta Wirth (7065 Eagle Trail) shared a similar situation 4 • which occurred in the City of Mahtomedi, and she commented the homeowners are very unhappy with the City's rezoning decision. In addition, the Mahtomedi bank has been held -up for ransom which subjects the neighborhood to violence. Mr. Marcel Rivard (7022 Progress Road) voiced concern his property may become landlocked if the Clearwater Road is vacated. Mr. Kolsted clarified the vacation of road is from Main Street to Sorel Street. Thus, the property in questioned would not be landlocked. Ms. Peggy Anderson (7082 Progress Road) questioned the Developer who would pay for the sidewalk and its maintenance. Chair Welk noted the city needs to acquire an easement prior to the sidewalk installation. Ms. Linda Paulson (1764 Main Street) commented the bank will not create more traffic than the tree farm generated. Ms. Paulson added, children should not be playing around Main Street area. Mr. Rick Paulson (1764 Main Street) recalled when deer roamed the area. Now, there are townhomes and diesel trucks running. In addition, there is a chiropractic office on Main Street in a residential district, a bank is better for tax purposes. Mr. Buckbee emphasized the City's need to wait on acting until the whole Main Street plan is considered. Ms. Brossard- Vickers suggested waiting until the city receives a report back from the design team, thus affording the city the opportunity to work with all the properties along Main Street. Also, unfortunately, neighborhood opposition does not determine approval or denial if a property is rezoned: 1 Ms. Roberta Wirth (7065 Eagle Trail) stated the zoning change will have an impact on the safety and welfare of all parties, which needs to be taken into consideration, as per state law. And if not, what criterion needs to be met for rezoning. Mr. March replied the city has "Police authority" which gives them zoning rights. Mr. Buckbee commented Mr. Kolsted has presented an interesting concept. However, the idea does not address spot zoning. Mr. Buckbee recommended waiting until the design team brings their ideas back to the city. Mr. Bisek suggested the Planning Commission not place too much 5 weight on the design team. Ms. Brossard- Vickers replied Mr. Kolsted's intent is to pursue the purchase of the property and the construction of the building in the spring of 1999. Therefore, it may be in the city's best interest to wait. Mr. Doug Porter (7046 Eagle Trail) observed south of Main Street is primarily residential and the main corridor of property is a blend of businesses and homes. Mr. Porter suggested the city cater to residential or commercial for future developments. Mr. Porter added, he is opposed to the construction of the bank and stressed the need for children's safety in and around the bank. Chair Welk commented it is difficult to consider all options at this time. It is the City's intentions to bring both residential and business together in harmony. fir. Buckbee moved and it was seconded to recommend to the Council not to apbrove the rezone and vacation of property request for reasons of rezonjna and to wait for the downtown revitalization committee report. Motion carried unanimously. Ms. Brossard- Vickers moved and it was seconded to recess for five (5) minutes. Motion carried unanimously. John Snyder - Site Plan for Terminal Transport Mr. March gave an overview of the proposed business. The facility located at the south east intersection of 20th Avenue and Ceder Street would be constructed to house offices for the payroll business function and for a truck maintenance department. Mr. March foresaw concerns with County Road 54 access. Mr. Buckbee noted it would be nice for the City to attempt to protect the residential properties south of Ceder Street. Clearwater Meadows Industrial Park Mr. Rehbein briefed the Planning Commission on a proposed layout plan for Clearwater Meadows outlot and he discussed businesses that are interested in building on the proposed property. Ms. Brossard - Vickers questioned the properties zoning. Mr. March indicated the property is identified as B1 Commercial. The Commission discussed light industrial lot requirements of one acre with a minimal lot width of 125' and the set back requirements along County State Aid Road 54. Mr. Buckbee explained the proposed layout meets the minimal lot 6 • size. However, the rezone is not conducive to the comprehensive plan. Mr. Palzer suggested the City consider adjusting the ordinances to allow light industrial and commercial in the same category. The Commission discussed identifying commercial, industrial and light industrial districts and its differences. Mr. Rehbein noted the suggestions and commented updates will be implemented and he will reproach the Commission at a later date. Willow Glen Business Park (WGBP) Preliminary Plat Mr. March reported on the WGBP and new developments. Mr. March reiterated the October Commission meeting minutes where the WGBP sketch plan was addressed. Mr. March also distributed a letter from the City Engineer and another from Anoka County Highway Department. Mr. Rehbein pointed out a discrepancy in the right -of -way (ROW) between Anoka County Highway Department and himself. Mr. Rehbein felt Anoka County is requesting too much front footage for the ROW. Mr. March commented the Commission moved to recommend the developer address access onto County Road 14 (Main Street). Ms. Brossard - Vickers questioned future access to outlot A. Mr. Rehbein indicated County Road 21 north is proposed and will service outlot A. Chair Welk recommended implementing one access onto County Road 14 and one access onto County Road 21. Mr. Rehbein stated the west access will be an exclusively right turn entrance only and another in and out access on Main Street and another on 20th Avenue. Action on Lot Split Request Ms. Brossard- Vickers confirmed the city ordinance and the state laws restrict lot splits in the floodplain /floodway. Mr. Palzer read aloud uniform building code 7.0 and 7.1. In summary, a property cannot be subdivided in the floodplain unless a buildable site is located on both of the proposed properties. In addition, the buildable area must be 2' above floodplain elevation. Mr. Palzer noted a building can be constructed in the floodplain. However, the building regulations are restrictive and can be costly. Ms. Brossard- Vickers confirmed the prospective owner knows the property is in the floodplain and cannot be reconstructed if 51% or more of the building is destroyed. Mr. Jack Green (7007 20th Avenue) stated denying this request 7 places the property owner in an unusual position to pay taxes on property that is restricted from utilizing the property. Ms Bro Vi mov an i w se co n d ed to table the lo split in order to gather more information and to reconsider the re uest Motion carried unanimously Action on the MUSA Swap Ms ou Brssard- Vickrs moved to ar gpove the MUSA swap re=quest and e to recommend to the City Council Motion carried unanimously Action on Variance Request - Kelly's Korner (7098 Centerville Road) Ms. Brossard- Vickers understood the nonconformity ADA concern, but noted the Commission has delayed other projects in anticipation of the design team's findings and questioned Staff if the Commission should wait to act on the variance request. Mr. Palzer commented on federal mandates allow buildings to become less nonconforming. Thus, suggesting the variance request is granted for an ADA ramp. Ms Bross Vi c k ers m to ec rommend appro of the variance request as requested due to the current ADA non- conformance Al so, recommended the trash containers are encl Moti carried unanimously. Ordinance 44 A M= Brossard- Vickers moved and it was seconded to table ordinance 44A until the June Commission meeting Motion carried unanimously. Discharge of Firearms Mr. Buckbee moved and it was seconded to table ordinance #5 until the June Commission meeting Motion carried unanimously Uniform Housing Code Ms. Brossard - Vickers moved and it was seconded.to table agenda item uniform housing code until the June Commission meeting Motion carried unanimously. Adjournment Chair Kathy Welk moved and it was seconded to adjourn the May 5, 1998 Pl an Z Co mmission meeting. Motion carried unanimously. The Planning and Zoning Commission meeting adjourned at 10:35 p.m. 8 CITY OF CENTERVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION JUNE 2, 1998 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Centerville held its meeting and several public hearings on June 3, 1998, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Chairperson Kathy Welk Commission Members: Linda Broussard- Vickers John Buckbee ABSENT: Commission Member Al LaMotte STAFF: Jim March, City Administrator Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk Paul Palzer, Building Official/Public Works Director David Nyberg, City Engineer Phil Bergen', P.E. Engineer *********************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Roll Call Chair Welk called the June 2, 1998 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. PUBLIC HEARINGS Lessard Rezone Request Mr. Willy Lessard (21080 Floral Bay, Forest Lake, Minnesota) addressed the Commission and requested the property at 7005 20th Avenue be rezoned from residential to commercial. Mr. Lessard explained in the past, the property was zoned and taxed commercially. However, recently the City changed the zoning from commercial to residential. Unfortunately, Mr. Lessard was unaware of the zoning change, therefore, he is requesting the property be rezoned back to commercial. Mr. Lessard further explained his intent is to focus on attracting good businesses in the commercial area. Mr. Ronald Lenz (7008 Brian Drive) stated, he and his family moved from St. Paul to Centerville for the peace and quite. Mr. Lenz read aloud a poem. In summary, the natural woods and its habitat are beautiful, so please don't forget about the little chipmunks and birds when considering to develop this property. • 1 Mr. Lessard said he appreciated the citizens' interest in nature and noted the property was classified commercial prior the Clearwater Meadows Development and the property will be developed. Mr. Michael Hunter (1917 Center Street) stated he has an investment to protect. The value of his property will decrease if commercial businesses are built behind his home. Ms. Maureen Wilson (7094 Brian Drive) stressed the through street connecting Brian Drive to 20th Avenue will increase traffic and the possibility of children getting hit by a vehicle. Mr. Lessard proposed to install a collector street to have the businesses access 20th Avenue and then eliminate a through road to 20th Avenue. Mr. Donald Moe (New resident on Brian Court) shared hint and his family moved two blocks to stay in Centerville. However, had the property behind his lot been zoned commercially, he would not have purchase the lot. In addition, he supported single family homes for the safety and welfare of the community. Also, the property value will be consistent and the area will be more esthetically pleasing to have his property abut residential homes rather than commercial businesses. Ms. Darlene Kurshener (7005 Brian Drive) commented had she knew this property may be rezoned commercial, she would not have purchased her house. Mr. Tim Pelican (1889 Center Street) commented, he and his family moved to Centerville two weeks ago to raise their children in a good community away from commercial businesses. Furthermore, he is opposed to the rezoning request and he believes the streets would be safer without commercial businesses located in the proposed area. Mr. Brad Hanggi (7003 Brian Drive) stated the existing houses on Brian Drive and Brian Court account for approximately twenty children and safety should be a city concern. Mr. Paul Gordy (6936 Ivy Court) moved to the city seven years ago, because of the peace and quite. Although, Mr. Lessard may lose money, if the property is not rezoned to commercial, however, the current residents will lose money. - Mr. David Luke (7026 Brain Court) noted that recently he and his family moved from Peltier Lake Drive to Clearwater Meadows for the natural surroundings. Now, he may be looking out his back window at a commercial district. In addition, why should the residents' pay for the City's lack of planning. Mr. Brain Hoffuan (1949 Center Street) said, whether it is commercial or residential the City should be aware that all the water from the twenty -acre parcel drains into the small pond behind lot 21, of Center Oaks development and it should be addressed. • 2 • Mr. Lessard continent there is an engineering study in progress to address drainage. Mr. Lessard added, the bulk of the City's tax burden is placed on businesses, therefore, the commercial district is a benefit to the City. Furthermore, Mr. Lessard would not propose anything that would be detrimental to the surrounding properties. The new businesses would be well designed with good commercial buildings to blend with the residential area. Mr. Jim March (7147 Brian Way) addressed several concerns that arose. Mr. March stressed any property owner can make a request to the city and the request must be addressed by the City. Therefore, the city is not endorsing the rezone request. Also, the City publishes public hearings and notifies all residents within 350' of the property in question. Therefore, some residents may not have been notified because their property is too far a distance from the proposed property. The City is governed by the people, and comments and concerns are taken into consideration. However, the City will do what is best for the City has a whole. Finally, the developments of Clearwater Meadows and Eagle Pass were designed by the City to connect Eagle Trail and Brain Drive. Mr. Buckbee questioned Staff if the last comprehensive plan indicated the twenty -acre parcel was zoned commercial. Chair Welk noted receipt of three letters received from the Kurshener family (7005 Brian Drive), Carter family (6944 Ivy Court), Johnson family (7017 Brian Drive), and the Lenz family (7008 Brian Drive) (Please see attached). Mr. Buckbee moved to adjourn this section of the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. Ms. Broussard - Vickers seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously Terminal Transport - Special Use Permit Mr. Brent Coatney and Mr, John Snyder gave a presentation on Terminal Transports concept and landscaping plan. The building will be approximately 14,000 square feet and will sit on 6.75 acres. Terminal Transport Developer plans are to break ground for the new building on June 15, and open for business in September of 1998. Mr. March clearly stated the certificate of occupancy will not be issued until the utilities are available and operational. Ms. Norma Nadeau (6644 20th Avenue, Lino Lakes) questioned the business owners if their entrance will be from 20th Avenue or Cedar Street. Mr. Snyder confirmed the business will have access onto 20th Avenue. Mr. March reported the property is industrially zoned and the lot size is similar to Northern Forest Product's lot size. Mr. Brian Hanson (1950 Center Street) said, the semi traffic has increased on 20th Avenue which 3 has caused an increase in noise and pot holes. Mr. Coatney explained the business will be used for central dispatch and a semi truck maintenance service center. Moreover, the semi truck traffic will consist of one to ten trucks daily, and central dispatch hours will be from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Mr. Michael Hunter (1917 Center Street) stated it appears the City of Centerville is becoming a business community and then the City will not be a quite community. Mr. Pete Nadeau (6644 20th Avenue, Lino Lakes) suggested the semi truck traffic be directed east on Ceder Street to eliminate 20th Avenue traffic. Mr. Buckbee suggested the developer screen the businesses from the residential district along Cedar Street in Lino Lakes. Mr. Joe Ulrich (7055 Cottonwood Court) commented additional office/ warehouse space will be good for the conununity tax base. Mr. Buckbee moved to close the Terminal Transport Special Use Permit public hearing. Ms. Broussard- Vickers seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Continuation of Ordinance #44A - Building Construction Chair Welk read aloud ordinance #44A - building construction and its proposed amendments. Ms. Broussard- Vickers moved to close the Ordinance #44A - Building Construction public h earin Mr. Buckbee seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Continuation of Joyce Stevens (Greene) Lot Split Request Ms. Broussard - Vickers moved to close the Joyce Stevens (Greene) lot split public hearing. Mr. Buckbee seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. APPEARANCES Mr. John Snyder Site Plan for Terminal Transport Mr. Snyder approached the Planning Commission and requested approval of the Terminal Transport site plan. Mr. March suggested revising the special use permit (sup) and require a shield between Terminal Transport and the Cedar Street residences: Ms. Broussard - Vickers confirmed the building size and setbacks are in compliance with the city code. Mr. Phil Bergum addressed right -of -way (ROW) concerns referred to in a letter dated June 2, 1998. The engineering firm recommended implementing a 33' ROW based on the center line. Likewise, Mr. Bergum suggested the Commission consider permitting the parking lot encroach on the drainage easement to assist in drainage. • 4 Chair Welk questioned the engineering staff in regards to the future expansion along the east side of the property. Mr. Bergum noted the proposed parking lot allows for extra water storage. Mr. March reported a pond is to be constructed north of the site. Mr. Nyberg commented the pond plans are being prepared, however, Mr. Rehbein will propose a comprehensive drainage plan for the 40 -acre industrial property. Mr. Buckbee questioned the engineers if the 40 -acre grading plan concept is conducive to Terminal Transports grading plans. Mr. Snyder replied Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) approved Terminal Transports grading plans. Ms. Brossard- Vickers confirmed with Staff the sup is compatible with contiguous properties, and that 20th Avenue is able to handle the increased semi truck traffic. In the like manner, Ms. Brossard- Vickers inquired about Anoka County's comments in regard to 20th Avenue access. Mr. March stated 20th Avenue is maintained by Anoka County. Also, Anoka County requested entrances accessing onto 20th Avenue are not within 200' of the intersection of 20th Avenue and Cedar Street. The proposed entrance complies with Anoka County Highway Departments requirements. Mr. March reiterated the sup addresses the fact that no utilities are at the property and no operation will be permitted until utilities are available to the property. Mr. Nadeau hoped the City will restrict noise from the trucks and maintenance shop. Mr. March explained the City has a noise ordinance. Ms. Brossard - Vickers moved to grant the sup contingent upon the dr.'n, • e concerns be addressed and no • . -r, ions take 'L. _ - at the site .ntil utilities ar- ,v.il.ble Al • that ther- i no access from this building. to Cedar Street in the future, and the Commission approves the site plan as submitted contingent upon the CitEngineer's approval Mr Buckbee seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously_.. Dick Travis - Sketch Plan for Moore Properties (7305 &7353 20th Avenue North} Mr. Dick Travis (7264 Twin Lakes) briefed the Commission on a proposed sketch plan with six lots, and one 10 -acre outlot, on a 20 -acre parcel and he requested the Commissions consideration for sketch plan approval. Mr. Travis planned to independently finance the utility improvements. Incidentally, a trail easement is proposed to access the park and additional park fees will be in lieu of park land. Mr. March reported due to an abandoned house east of the proposed development, the sketch plan is not in compliance with city ordinances. The ordinance states a septic system is allowed on a minimal 10 -acre parcel. The proposed development will cause too many structures on the south 20 -acre parcel. Mr. Travis replied the existing house will either be demolished or relocated. Chair Welk confirmed the property is within the MUSA. Mr. March said it is unlikely the utility line will serve the east property because of the wetlands. Mr. Nyberg explained that a shallow, 10" line is located south east on 20th Avenue. Moreover, the utility connections will have to be 5 • further investigated. Chair Welk confirmed the proposed lots conform with the R5 zoning, 17,000 square feet requirements. Ms. Brossard - Vickers suggested the Travis family return with a more defined plan and the further suggested they request to rezone the property from RI to R5. Mr. March noted the City will work with the Travis family to develop the developer's agreement, streets, curb, gutters and utility plans and specifications. Mr. Buckbee moved to recommend to the Council the property be developed as an R5 zoning district Ms Brossard - Vickers seconded the motion Motion carried unanimousl1 . Husnik Homes - Sketch Plan for Property North of Main Street Mr. Paul Husnik (2640 Westergreen, White Bear Lake) presented a sketch plan for the property on the north east corner of Main Street and Peterson Trail. ' The proposed building will consist of a couple retail units with rear delivery truck access. Mr. Husnik hoped the building will be constructed and ready for occupancy fall of 1998, Ms, Broussard - Vickers confirmed the first of two driveways is located 90' from County Road 14. Mr. March noted the building is proposed to be of brick construction and encroaches 10' within the drainage easement. Ms. Broussard- Vickers said the building meets with the B1 (commercial) requirements. However, four thousand square feet buildings are identified within the light industrial zoning district. Therefore, Mr. Husnik may need to redesign the building or request a variance for the building square footage. Mr. Nyberg explained the building is proposed to encroach on the drainage easement. However, there may be room on the east side of the property to create a deep Swale so the drainage would not be hindered. Gre¢ Watson - Starfire Gymnastics (Vacant Property south of Eagle Trucking) Mr, Watson (Senior Project Manager) addressed the Planning Commission and gave an overview of the proposed building construction and the site plan for a gymnastics facility. The 15,000 sq. ft. gymnasium is proposed to be located on Clearwater Meadows outlot C. The facility will be used as a modified day care, dance studio and gymnastic training location. The owners plan to hold summer camp and Special Olympics at the proposed site. Mr. Buckbee questioned the project manager as to the height of the building. Mr. Watson said the height is proposed at 21'. Mr. March noted the ordinance allows a maximum of 35'. Ms. Broussard- Vickers questioned the engineer about the drainage concept. Mr. Nyberg explained the drainage from the rear parking lot will drain into the creek. In addition, Mr. Nyberg suggested extending the berm to buffer the residents from the commercial property. Ms. Tina Riehle (7044 Cottonwood Court) felt concerned about the drainage because water 6 collects on the property and then the overflow drains onto her property. Ms. Pam Neulkenes (7054 Cottonwood Court) asked what guarantees do the property owners have that in the future the gymnasium will not be converted into an industrial building. The Commission replied there are no guarantees. Mr. Watson stressed a desire to obtain a building permit to ensure the business will be in operation by September 1998. Mr. Buckbee moved to recommend to the Council that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend Starfire Gymnastics be permitted within the uses of that district and that they may proceed without a public hearing for a special use permit Motion seconded by Ms Broussard - Vickers. Motion carried unanimously. Ms. Broussard - Vickers moved to recommend the preliminary sketch plan is approved with special attntion to landscaping (to mitigate the west side of the prooertvl and suggested the engineer work with the drainage issue. Motion seconded by Mr. Buckbee. Motion carried unanimously. Action on Lessard Rezone Request The Commission discussed the Lessard rezone request. Mr. Buckbee commented traffic will increase with more homes and suggested leaving the property zoned, as is, commercial and residential. Mr. Lessard explained a blend of doctor offices, dentist offices' and/or business offices will make a nice transition between the residential and commercial zones. Mr. Buckbee suggested Mr. Lessard return to the Commission with an idea of how he would like the property to develop. Ms. Broussard - Vickers commented she would like to research the legal guidelines and explore why and how the property was and is zoned. Mr. Lessard stated he will sign a 60 -day rezone waiver form. Mr. Nyberg commented Eagle Pass is a PUD (Planned Unit Development) and suggested Lake Area Utilities land be developed as a PUD. Furthermore, the City's intention is to connect Eagle Trail to Brain Drive. Mr. Buckbee moved to table the Lessard rezone re uest ntil he Jul 7 1998 Plannin• commission meeting and to direct staff to renotifi the surrounding oropertv owners the issues will be revisited. Motion seconded by Ms. Broussard- Vickers. Motion carried unanimously. Action of Stevens (Greene) Lot Split Request Mr. March briefed the Commission on flood plain regulations pertaining to Stevens lot split request. Mr. March discussed City ordinance #33 - Flood Plain; in summary, a structure cannot be built within the flood way. Mr. Palzer reported the state law states, in order to approve a lot split within the flood way the site must provide a building site outside of the flood way. Mr. March said the proposed lot will not have an area for constructing a building outside of the flood way. In any case, the city has authority to grant a variance to its own ordinance, but not to state 7 laws. However, the property owner can apply for an amendment to FEMA for a map amendment. The City is restricted and cannot approve a lot split based on the information presented. Ms. Bro ard- Vickers moved • den the lot slit rased o he fact .resented b the • uil.in! Official that the City cannot grant a variance to the state laws. Also. advise the property owner to annly for a letter of map revision from FEMA in order to request a lot split in the future Motion seconded by Mr. Buckbee. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Buckbee moved to table everything_remaining on the agenda. Ms. Broussard - Vickers seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Buckbee moved to adjourn the June 2. 1998 Planning and Zoning meeting. Ms. Broussard - Vickers seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 10:40 p.m. • Respectfully Submitted, Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC • City Clerk • 8 From: Mr. & Mrs Johnson { j 1- 7017 Brian Drive Centerville, MN 55038 To: City of Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 RE: PROPOSED REZONING OF R23- 31- 22 -41- 0003 -THAT PRT OF THE E1 /2 OF THE N1 /2 FO THE N1 /2 OF THE SE 1/4 FO SEC 23 TWP 31N. R23- 31 -22 -41 -0004- THE N 330 FT OF THE E1 /2 OF THE N1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC 23 TWP 31N. The rezoning of this property from R2 to B1 would be inappropriate and irresponsible. The job of the City Planning and Zoning Commission is to maintain the integrity of the City and its residents by making decisions that will benefit the City and it's residents. The reason that this property is currently zoned R2 is because 100's of families and thousands of children surround this property. The people that currently built houses in this neighborhood and long standing tax payers of this city moved here to get away from bright lights and commercial sites typical of the inner city. There are many more appropriate settings in the City of Centerville for commercial property. Make the rieht decision and vote against this proposal. We are prepared to use any legal means as necessary to stop this proposed rezoning. Lets not make a mountain out of a molehill and stop this proposal swiftly. Sincerely, 0 111 1 r. Jo son Mrs. Job so May 25, 1998 City of Centerville 1880 Main St. Centerville, Mn. 55038 City of Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission, This letter is in response to the rezoning of R23 -31 -41 -003 & R23- 31 -22 -41 -0004 etc or locally known as Lake Area Utilities Cont. Inc. My husband and myself are urging the Zoning Commission to keep the above said property as residential. We live in a new home that borders this property. We have only lived here for the past six months. We chose this property for the obvious reasons, which do not include commercial property right next door. We called the city before purchasing this lot and were told there were no plans for that particular property. Now we come to find out that you want to put commercial property right next door to my new home!!!! That is ridicules!!!!! We expected that at some point there would be another home built next to ours, although we were hoping for a park or refuse for the wild life. Had we known your intentions we would have chose to build elsewhere. We have spent a lot of time and money on our new home. We do not intend to have the value of our new home depreciate and that is what will happen. Our family moved here from the city to have peace and quiet not a business next door. Then there is the issue of safety and security in our neighborhood. The street we live on is a dead end. We have many small children and we are very concerned about the increased traffic. Also this piece of land is home to many of the wildlife in the area. We look out the window and see deer in our backyard and ducks swimming in the pond. Maybe we should think of preserving some of this. We will fight to keep this from becoming a reality. Our home and our new way of life are at stake. We will attend your meeting on June 2 to show our support to veto this outrageous proposal. Sincerely, 0 V Georgine & Robert Kurschner 7005 Brian Dr. Centerville, MN. 55038 fl 1 9 1998 Concerning the proposed zoning change for property just south of 7008 Brian dr., please don't ! I feel very strongly about living next to any commercial enterprise. My wife and I left the city of St. Paul a year and one half ago for some peace and quiet, after retiring from the Fire Department. So again, PLEASE RETAIN THE PRESENT RESIDENTIAL ZONING . Respectfully, Ronald and Mary Ann Lenz 7008 Brian DR. Centerville n ° I ‘2,11 CITY OF CENTERVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Centerville held its regularly scheduled meeting at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Chairwoman Kathy Welk Commission Members: Al LaMotte Linda Broussard- Vickers ABSENT: Commission member John Buckbee STAFF /CONSULTANTS: Jim March, City Administrator Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk Tom Peterson, Consulting Engineer OPENING Roll Call PUBLIC HEARING (S) Preliminary Plat Consideration for Mound Trail (Carl Buechler ) Mr. Carl Buechler was present to discuss the proposed Buechler Estates preliminary plat and to request the Commissions approval. He also planned to independently finance the utilities and to pay park funds in place of park dedicated property. Mr. Peterson noted the city plans to install utilities along the southeast property boundaries and he suggested the developer provide a 20 -foot wide utility easement along the sanitary sewer, east of the plat. A 20 -foot easement should be provided for the entire length of the easement, not a 10- foot easement. The easement will allow the city to maintenance and repair the lines. He also commented a tree may need to be removed to install the proposed utilities. Mr. Joe Holiday (1295 Mound Trail) noted the willow tree is located on his property and felt no concern to remove the tree. Ms. Cathy Holiday (1295 Mound Trail) voiced concern pertaining to the developer ensuring the 1 proper drainage. Also, the Holiday property is adjacent to Lot 1, of the proposed development. Mr. Buechler commented the drainage has been addressed and will not affect the property at 1295 Mound Trail. Mr. Peterson stressed the bad soils in the area and suggested soil borings on each lot and prior to building permit approval. Ms. Broussard- Vickers noted a potential concern with draining from lot 5 onto lot 4, and she noted item #5 of the Public Works Directors/Building Officials comments. #5. "The proposed drainage swale in the roadway ditch doesn't meet with the City's requirements of a 1% minimum grade." Mr. Peterson suggested a drainage swale between lot 5 and west of the existing lots. Mr. Rod Holhizer (7193Mound Trail) questioned the Developer about the slope between lot 5 and his lot and hoped that no future drainage problems would occur. Mr. Lloyd Drilling (7185 Mound Trail) addressed and questioned the Commission in regards to the Mound Trail and its condition, who owns and maintains the road and who is responsible for road repair. Furthermore, he confirmed an RCWD permit is required and that a Saint Paul Utilities (City of St. Paul) permit is not required. Mr. Holhizer had a point of information considering this house is located in the City of Lino Lakes, his mail box is in the City of Centerville and his mailing address is in the City of Hugo - will the cities consider redesigning the corporate boundaries or annexing the last two lots on Mound Trail. Mr. LaMotte move' to close the public hearine Ms Broussard - Vickers seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Special Use Permit for Tim Peppenger - Operate an Auto Electrical Repair Shop Mr. Tim Peppenger (7129 20th Avenue North) was present to request a special use permit recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission to the Council°. Chair Welk confirmed traffic and parking would not hinder the area businesses. She also confirmed the business hours will be from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Mr. March confirmed Mr. Peppenger would not have exterior storage and adequate parking was available. Mr. LaMotte moved to close the public hearing. Ms. Broussard - Vickers seconded the motion. Motion carried. A variance - Road to he over 800' in Length with a Temporary Cul Mr. Thomas Peterson (City Engineer) updated the Commission on the proposed variance. He suggested the cul -de -sac be constructed at 60' (right -of -way) because the north property may not afford a road to be constructed. 2 • Ms. Broussard- Vickers suggested shortening the road from 960' to 800'. Mr. Peterson commented, the road and cul -de -sac should be constructed to the north property line for future construction. Mr. LaMotte moved to close the public hearing. Ms. Broussard- Vickers seconded the motion. Motion c arried una Amend Cable Ordinance #40 Chair Welk acknowledged the audience. Ms. Broussard- Vickers moved to close the public hearing Mr. LaMotte seconded the motion Motion carried unanimously. A variance - Reconstruction of a shed at 1563 Peltier Lake Drive for Phippen Ms. Broussard- Vickers moved to close the Phippen variance public hearing. Mr. LaMotte seconded the motion Motion carried unanimously. Rezone Property From R1 to PUD (Planned Unit Development) For Rehbein Chair Welk addressed the audience and requested comments in regards to the rezone request for the property identified as the west 10 acre portion of 7305 & 7353 20th Avenue. Mr. Rod Henslin (1967 73rd Street) was present to discuss the rezone request from R1 to PUD. He also said that the proposed development did not include grass, nor playground equipment because of the blacktop requirements. Mr. Henslin requested the Conunission to deny the request based on a noncompliance of the R5 zoning requirements and since the developers lacked to address the PUD items in Ordinance #4. Mr, LaMotte moved to close the public hearing. Ms. Broussard - Vickers seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. APPEARANCES Willie Lessard - Sketch Plan for Lake Area Utilities - 6994 20th Avenue Mr. Lessard (6994 20th Avenue) presented a sketch plan for the Lake Area Utilities property. He also explained the proposed plan of 23 lots are in compliance with the R2 zoning requirements. All the lots are a minimum, of 15,000 sq. ft. Mr. Lessard explained that all concerns express from pass meetings have been addressed: lights, traffic the through road from Brain Drive to 20th Avenue and a desire to have homes instead of townhomes/commercial. He also noted he proposed to provide a trailway easement on the east side of 20th Avenue in exchange of park dedicated land. Mr. Lessard requested the Commissions approval to pursue preliminary plat consideration during the October Commission meeting. The Planning Commission suggested Mr. Lessard attend the Park and Recreation meeting the following night. 3 ACTION ITEMS Action on Planning and Zoning Candidate Ms. Gaustad reported on behalf of Mr. Buckbee he chose Mr. Brian Hanson to fill the Commission vacancy and secondly, Mr. Dick Travis as an alternate. Chair Welk agreed with Mr. Buckbee. Mr. LaMotte elected Mr. Travis and second, Mr. Brian Hanson, Ms. Broussard - Vickers questioned Mr. Travis if his position would cause a conflict of interest. Mr. Travis commented the Woods development is near completion and will be finished.. Second, Glenn Rehbein Excavating seldom works in the Centerville area. Therefore, he did not foresee a conflict of interest. Mc Broussard- Vi k cers o mved to ap p r ove Mr B rian Hanso and as an alternate Dick Travis C hair Welk seconded the motion Motion carried un ,Action on Preliminary Plat for Mound Trail (Buechler 1 Mc Broussa V m oved to recom to the Council pr of preliminary pl subject to the conce of the Cit F neineer and Public Wor Director with special attention to the road and that the plat is presented to the Park and Recreation Commission at its next scheduled meeting. Chair Welk seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Action on Special Use Permit for an Auto Electrical Repair Shoo Mr. LaMotte recommended the Council approve the Special Ilse Permit request for an Auto Electrical Repair Shop at 7129 - 20th Avenue Ms. Broussard- Vickers seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously Action on Variance Request for a Road Over 800' in Length with a Temporary Cul de Ms. Broussard- Vickers moved to recommend to the Council a .roval of the variance request for a road over 800' in length with a tempos cul -de -sac and the d imensions to meet with the ci engineer's aonroval Mr LaMotte seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimousl Action on Variance to Reconstruct a Shed at 1563 Peltier 1,ake Drive Ms. Gaustad updated the Commission on the variance requested to reconstruct a shed at 1563 Peltier Lake Drive. Ms. Gaustad suggested the Commission require the property owner to submit to the City a certificate of survey noting the location of the cement slab. The Commission did not take action. Action on a Rezone Request from RI to PUD (Gerald Rehbeinj Ms Brossard- Vickers moved to untable the Rezone request and to re -table the request suhiect to the developer signing a 60 -day rezone waiver form and that the resident duly noted specific PUD requirements as outlined in the ordinance is addressed, Chair Welk seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously, 4 DISCUSSION ITEMS Reschedule November 3. Planning and Zoning Meetin to Novemb 10. 1998 - Tabled Amend Ordinance #5 Discharge of Firearms - tabled CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES March 12. 1998 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes Mr. LaM tte moved to acce.t the arch 12 1998 Planning and Zoning Meeting, minutes. Chair Welk seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A I ril 7 1998 Plannin. and Zonin Meetin. Minutes The Commission recognized no meeting was held on April 7, 1998. May 5. 1998 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes - Tabled June 1998 Planning and Zoning_Meeting Minutes - Tabled July 7. 1998 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes u_ :ro. .rd -V it. -, • • -, 7 ' <itI ._., _.i1' u - '1. �� - 'th corrections. Mr. LaMotte seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously_ Chair Welk noted the City's desire to implement the PUD requirements for the Rehbein property. However, Mr. Rehbein will need to comply with Ordinance #4: Article 5 - Planned Unit Developments. She also read aloud the above - mentioned ordinance. Mr. Tom Kennedy (1983 73rd Street) and Mr. Tom Hauge (1994 73rd Street) opposed further restricting, Ordinance #5 Discharge of Firearms. Chair Welk read aloud section 3 of ordinance #5. Ordinance #4 - Outbuildings - Saxton Mr. Dan Saxton (1949 73rd Street) was present to discuss ordinance #4. Particularly, Section 34.06 -1 AMOUNT OF YARD OCCUPIED. In the R -2A R -2 and R -5 zoning districts a detached accessory building not over one story and not exceeding fourteen (14) feet in height may occupy not to exceed ten (10) percent square footage of the area of any rear yard. The height of the accessory building shall not exc-& 1 the height of the primary building. Mr. Saxton commented his neighbor erected a shed that is 14 feet wide, 24 feet long and 17 feet high. This shed is 10 feet from his property line and 25 feet from the back lot line. Mr. Saxton distributed photos of the shed while in various stages of construction. He then requested the Commissions consideration to amend the ordinance to ensure another property owner does not have a similar experience. 5 Ms. Broussard- Vickers interpreted the ordinance differently than Mr. Saxton and requested Staff provide clarity to the Commission. Usually, additional language is intended to be more restrictive than the lack of words. The Commission discussed amending the ordinance to reduce rear yard accessory structures from 10 percent to 8 percent and specifically address corner lots. The Commission requested Staff investigate the items below and report to the Commission. * Shed permits that are added onto basement permits * The Building Inspectors interpretation of the ordinance & section in question. * Elevation requirements and changes for new structures. * Research to see if another similar permit has been issued and if one is pending, the Commission makes strong recommendation not to issue another similar permit until this issue is resolved. ADJOURNMENT Ms. Broussard - Vickers moved to adjourn the Planning and Zonine Meetin l seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The September 1, 1998 Planning and Zoning Meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk 6 — CENTERVILLE COMMUNITY MEETING MINNESOTA DESIGN TEAM SEPTEMBER 25, 1998 1. What are the three best things about Centerville today? • Small town/community atmosphere. • Natural environment/amenities. • Community institutions. • Heritage. • Growth opportunities. 2. Does Centerville need a downtown? If yes, what three things would you like to see there? If no, why not? Most people said YES • Small, locally -owned shops that are unique to Centerville. • Place for kids. • Incorporate heritage - preserve what the older generation worked for. • Physical improvements. If NO, why not? • Too close to Twin Cities. • Too small. • Too isolated from other movement corridors- e.g. bike trails. • Physical condition — eyesore. 3. How would you like CSAH 14 to change, if at all? • Most consensus around CSAH 14 not changing or being. "downgraded" with sidewalks, crosswalks, bike lanes, slower speeds, no trucks, stop signs. • Some agreement to re -route it out of the village center. • Convert to three lanes, with central turn lane. • Streetscape improvements - lighting, landscaping, entry statement. • Adjacent land uses - stores, residences, fill in "missing teeth ". 4. If you left Centerville for five years, what would you hope to see upon your return? "A home town, where families and kids can live in harmony with growth, development and the environment." • Downtown. • Physical character. • Development. • Beautification. • Public realm. • Community identity. L e n rut i Ie —a suburban Gornrnw 3 Q�„s _ rin ` be a_ sro ij t* n Liko_i- is v*n , ,..!c. . 0 hh rui <<s .? . . • b etse d in ieriTa e an' " 'tretr./Mon . . • 'mindful of Carrenit . deue!opmenf pressure • rriovil U,S owards e $a,4re . where . . tarn i ies and. K ids Cam . tee in ha rmery tviM 5r014+41, deue1opment amd +he enuiro»men# L eocirsj,e . is a6ou.f proces, proces . »o+Con +e»* . . . Con-l-en+ beIonms -!a -M Centerville M1N x110 TA SepemUer 1998 DESIGN rc.v r it e r :t y � t T ,L \ - A u 40 t NO V VISION centervilie SePtenher 1998 TaAm a� ��� 1 ao �+ j b #AArA �. f e / . --1 _ 7 " -. tlMtl m hi itt A A d y' a. e I 1 / �' 4F �'hlil ggtlYtl I ii � y tl �'... ',.I' ^� I � ytl p y - tl�i5�gg >o k tic _ ON / -/�`'� � � � ? i,,,s 1 1 ra � .y ./ lk* MAP nr \ i ti � $ ,,pp tr'el)( all "�� , , db � ` Ih 1 A dQ'nt-d �I ���/� A A A I ,� Ei,,A nil/ lOS'A r 1s,;r /••VINET� I s ,a rg LP-Ink g g 'd ",:i � ,: 4 ' Sup _ [ ' �• r f F v i l e s ,. Y is @ yy t � �� RA4N� � EF vw mE , 4 'le* y L PA- ima- i Iiii if MD; Win PLUM we i. A ' g r .9,...,,kg,........,. ....,..,,,,-„. Et la 'Q Gt/r] E lre d1y 'LI Va,' ! / M! (FREE/✓ BEL? Am kac s n= fnsk . , 0 t 51 agi LAKE CNATU,eHL,G- GREfI7T0�U� r '�� � I � . rJCln!!?tl� 9r ; P, ee T • ON - ROi) eve /6HBORm904) / • . _ .. ` � t',/— "� m. - , i . � I _ - - :4i -._ • t t'y /g (Go�/NJE uhtc) GAKEFRON]' • " r °"" cakes. z y Third. ! A AAAA4 AA AAAAAq• R F{G • H 4 441 r-ES ETG, z � mittens' (@Q tlf11114 a\ al, EstablisAnd 1857 , itervtille - - ._ _ i L O ,s. ` — t I _ t N Centerville i f'� MINNESOTA _ _ tL/ � D ESIGN `-- �- - - --- • TEAM • . . . • . . -- t 11 NP ' y \ U ' YI r -+ l � Z J 7/ i 6 ia' •o" n' -o' • J9 GREEK • w . . . .� ► • 1'.., I ■--,. P a r I. BIKE , _ .. eirf. . . . . . . . 6v' O . . • • GONNEcr,ave 70 •eC V *14ces, arc. K.D.IV a GREE 4s A me-Au TY ENTER /M o r DcIAL USES • B /.r. �P�D. T.QA /L •DE'NE N,AK 8 /KE . GwNE n/ ex/O7 - "S E� - • Geass eOUNTR7 7P1/9/4-1 a /rornt�e 6 /KE GANE CEQ G FOB NE7 / IJE y��lp�yJp /� . / ) 1 • . ; . . . . . a, `1 ice A. i- 1 I 1C FGTURE F ' b • �. a. E L A K E . ' • $6 E USES sy /77Y L AND ea CE ' s ;? r pet.. e ,q 1L o Ape T ,roe Gi ` .� • TPA . . LAKE FRONT • • f �rw •EQu,,eF . • 4 4° ( _-`____, . ox e, P6- -,0 m,m,, c eos..5 cot/NT/e OS —l2 D C Centerville M 1 N.'II a o TA. ' Dana.' TEAM *kegler 1998 . • . 1 , a /, /, ( w . b _,, as art °i'� — 1 /0 4 %I / l l i w' � j , , / . � ! J ' r b l I ----e-: AI p ro + ,� + i ce ' . „ , Z L A X E CONA/5GT/Div °NIAxa ' / 4,e6 - ci & GA TE WA r 5 / cN ®,.,,P,eoa E t/-4z.us 7 .METAL 5�uc7�n�E 7 /rwTRocI5l G.4tE �/^ `ioN Fi e, OVA ', 1 i ,€Du/ ,9* 'RMe,4L , %Z • • • (130.47 G9NOC 2En7'9G> . 5 T ( Centerville Nixnemv September 1998 UISIGN T6wM ° I , M / �� Q 1 �� ;;;;__ x' : :T Q a ■ ■ ■: 1 1 !4 ri aiaM. P . M ZN STREET /2 #_,;10: it , } 1 ta p c_ t i_4__. 1 ._n_ _ , k ,„, NB , - ,. 201-, J ' Liu • ■■ -u - _ ` •:‘::' ; • Y - 7 7 r rr " r / J i 41 �..._.. • ''R� g .. _ _ te a • a. .hl(IA.'» • Vv • .Vki 1 ./� ; \ .cam s, 6Z centerviiie .mixes., September 1998 o cs,cx re.ee All.rs9:. 0 -_, .s..._ , , _ ., 4,..t. ,, , , , ,, ,47:rni,--rii,-- v 7 PRq'�. A RRA q'$4°a$ d o °'A �, 1 ►'v . : iN e a I '17 o mm r ead ,+� .y itr v+ ' � a ee qy � ralat I R ism , 1 � �'� 3 dPP°lgs l fll - I » L j �Q a i A ng 9 - _-- - - - - -- ktke Iii24-":14111 1 1:1 1 r,r i a l • " t-- cbk H 14" a 6 f 1P n.•.!fr die '!dd... ► T GoRRI D t a�� q SEGMte N.,tMt '�� rr I , ,\ ia s- � '�ilii�Y Ye i � Zit dgia y i :. aY _ t erville — established .es, . -- . °. ..a .,. �. j ., --A, 7 7( L I `�_ c. Centerville MINNESOTA D ESIGN - ___- - - - - -- ----I SEAM ■ i f` �. i • , l � 1 ' 0 — aa ,,. .... A 410 I sows-A. le 3 • 1 17!►y r a •tl tlger7 .44419t ' d tla�Agbp� a 9pAAAAAAR o § ,- a A � � N : s �e At) sg "m nhga . ddd n i d1 te.r.. s f * � I mg i9iF � a•, , . r , ii , \also:Num -,_, —Nrit4 ,+/e MAP aW_ viti Nig, ‘ a al a g obs • • • vOli 77, ^ ?�I nE Eld �rj r -i — 3 1 °� • LAME 1 a it.. .e itdn rir' ` Ant .a '-4 „ A S ` % t ` >»> . . ti li � g om pq plummgp f�_ pp 1 11 , ' . • • . • 1 '0 dr.k.;?6.11. ! .,.- . &on tiil MOMS ' Nag . .. - t."5.mtly 'LT' -._ __—__ -- it, C;Vs1 R R a 41 % o . .a (® rol / P k' sti 1 (.T0 bE trElt � �, .. `4 5 I 4plttet pg. A�1;l It' It' Wd1E. ea 4 ) 44449.1 eV.I O. / I ZO ra.a.w" - COUNT`( PLAN . 41ert'eT t4hh(GIfJle Th tit feTg ,, 1 RE4roLw ■ 1 `� Lal done / ht%Po. Tr- 0C", y �T°IZE �St4fr fl9 h If = .y �,, 1 �.,,\ s. a i' 1 reu-st J g i . g' Ii it � IZ is,. ���� 4%0c • , \laitr-e0 iillibgeo MM � bIKE 44 GFIYIN rsge4 wear "- = - ca fe' v1u,AGte. GGI4,72 eeCclaN Q. To 1.414re what. , ViAmt4G , i Sae P?.RK_WAY 1 7te.X kaN ' 2 c' s KV " S, . " I�F1 ■ ::w E5( 017Gt1 1 I -, wMRKtN/f 0114061 Centerville ,< loo' t-11 JeFLTBFdhL hEGT1oN ) f M,xn "en 1998 DESI {e.M I ; � / I(2 VILLAGE T 43- ppj APVA s , DVA AG s DVANT G E 1 • H fCi iec ' 4 ' 4 lower %pectic • 4Io er i; p P It eli trr .ter lo s °(l ! r 1 n dim r • 6af p&C rtem • ( "'t,: i ,,. ,;�' ! is wit) •, C' Yl` c tt'11t'S I J . - J" f t r lit_ • " { , 4 y j . • jperet�iec viCirt li'h' 1 ggJr t ' Fit i Off* C eet tT {tli a oe" t`lt( (le r, COI: aa r , 4 t- i . - by VI qdi evt( It \'" i e a s P SADVA rrAGEC OF Cou PLAN • Remav4 bIdgs. in Village tutor. • Erica/reties ilwougk wiffro. E yrtmnra c I�gher 'twffit Speeds. 1 Creates buvrier beiw� hor% ood south E • r►cou eS more rug C- build it Y of two. . arvd tPcY wit( come. • Chang €5 character of Ce rvr (( 9 ( Centerville Mrn,tSOT. Dssrcn September 1998 re.M • • Il n r Wtos4W y1D vaL K-S • l ' ,� H ot71X.ev fZD Ttez j r FF,a , 1 r :s ' am 1� r l C.Roccov4L�5 Nike f 1 IC sl 1 ! t o 4JR6 RM�1Py LoU.14RDS --- IfiellaZe .7 �: u 611 LJ NC { raw ISM' +FiXttS • • • �jt i 33i ily�i. I; ka F� r5 `J x i eb T t.>> -' vv9 I • • . 7 9 0idc-1/4-2,74.0:. 4 'N . ■".1 . . E X 15ThN& 8 U /LDING, L___, , 1 NVENTORV /race . • IC( Centerville swxmm,. September 1998 Ueticx tEAx . . • . �l I da L2'! N. = _ - - I - - _ f ly _, l : i I t L . _ _1 C, `1. _St _ _ - �a. -.a I • 1x ..yd - it., ti �u narF rnre..i. 1 rKr . &>'W 444“k"- --TITSTS -"lil rr F j... VLLLAGa . CENTElk . . . 1 ---- , 1 ,, l i IF ___________ _______ • __._____11, 1 i , , . . . . . ., . • , _ ______ ____ ___11 - .•.,_—_,..e-r,----__—_ _ R tj G. • j\ u+u MI tio� ®� tauaL . e1_1--Y I 1I( Centerville MINNef OT& 7',.. September 1998 MAIM 0 • ELEM.. 9 W ci 2 • rl4 ini 5'7 K EE n(. � if ilIIIiIIIN011111mi ;`ma YIIII'IpIIIIIIINIIIfglIpY4k, �; , ;,. -- _ t." cr .�,ea -. v ..n�-- 7t1� A� ����onv MLL sL T rr' 11immilllilX, i .,r f inenglinnallaillintnir _ , »i e7ii _ e L i ®m .. 1 .'' —Li--...- ' ter— ia - - wiainam ma _ �w �. _ rrerrrt • Pro __._arrrnucint ..r areL';y�nect r - .> PROPOSED . COMM.ERCI L- . PEYEL- O PMEUT _ - . • • lZC centerviiie MINNESOTA September 1998 Deno.. Tssn .'s • NEW • EAGE FOR SH•oPP1 N G- STRIP - 111 1 SUGGESTED I TpvWNOM ( OUVNHtlMa i • . ....q Thri••- I I I I I I I I I I i� t . I I I I I I I 1 I I I I ) ad"! i. I I I I I I I I I I I I • �. IIIIIIlIf r � f. I I I I I I I I I ; .: o f I1i111) IIIliiillil 2 .. . . T • , H I rY¢ H Go. RD I4 •• MU _ f p Elce SR A , J 14 • ErPRCSS Y FJ y J E 1 --'4C,,,tie . -- - *Zs � Centerville Oeewx Ten• September 1993 I • • ?AKIKIING • 115 • Nair AN • ISSUE sN 04 4 NOR7s} ON STREET " PARKING SCN 001- PAR A UOUT H 3 SPACE 5 _ (was :rs.s, 2g, OOQ 5QUARE FEET / N . e �r11 OF RETAIL 5PAG6 i / ABOUT S, l00 S K r � l GZvAr?E FEE T • Ei $ } ,( EXrsT1 NG-) t. maii.1 1- S KE OFF - STREET P ARKIN G - )/ a [B,N... , a nRK, ^ ss . � �- p SPACES ✓ AT 1- .EAST' 1 2o SPACE f Mortal N AVAiLA6LE FOR SHARING- ` So RII4 — JTRECT 1 ' ,- , CIRCLE 51 -1ov ✓5 300 Foorr SAD 1 u • . VIL L.AGG .C.Em17e PC. . . Centerville M xxesorn T kM September 1998 r e... • •. 1 • • • 4s&nrh j,snLit , hrhibi -es +�blishec! re Ia.-tion5h ps- church. School *precede -shore 3pa.c.e, /oc proble lu 4 din j on C 1,+i. & a . d a.pis /At nut? or • pil s i cat r'ee 1m • Peo realm school park sn Jot —5now i r»ob; /e 1es- 'va / - re no vet -ion ` mara,-1 -hot e is-4;1 H aa e, ec ri +e.r b u, i c/ ►' s 15 Centerville MIYN!>OA $p�llllb"998 • • I fietwoknir, Gurnee ij Centen4ksw� 3 ID lo seen CSAN- 14 u tec +'oh • CSC! 14 14 otreefa ca. pe seckon • you. -h cen +er • CSA 14 (4 ui 119e Cenf g r 5ecfion • fosta_I 5t& -fion FM. a & /-kshin pier • Acorn Creek Pa • historic. jai I res push works a. • 51deo0.. ks c.s 50- Connec.i,'on,s g � k,d • recforj as Com ma n ;, � paCe. new church a onj la ke and Cree . Corrid •C parkway canr. 16( Centerville MINMt$O7e Daewx WON �1esRY i�B 1 11111111.11111.1.11 � • • - aniasi . UWE K 11 P 15 marl �J 4a N aT CfUfEM . :� CONT W bEWI4CtS 1V ~TIDE PUY E wen__ wer NIDD114(71E=4A --4 Enc, 4 5cums•T ma.* assi a+ . es* :,,,,, A pAzf N tilil.l... S-jGNs " "-+ a LAMM' WNita nas i a+ : ALL S1r1..}IpLPE25 ?MI' ,N * GATE_ KPiNU NIIII 4 PtRt116s GIV ING, F,AQL- ITA71ON . �WS Got�hl USES dr 15"f 41,►7Pv J Et4 T 4c REGRurr GIFTS 4 t1S, NcT &t »ES - Tot e lArdi µ ©T EMOUGP} . cEL .ERA W._ STNJ -- vIaoR11S .TO. *. Too' huC4 L CEP S14tP _ N t) -No �ut�rtc- . --te I 7( Centerville ' M IfKS SOT . 1 Se 1998 •T)::.... T%AM ncx CENTERVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 20, 1998 • Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Centerville Economic Development Committee held their regular scheduled meeting on October 20, 1998. Chairperson Tim Rehbine called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. Present: Theresa Brenner, Mary Capra arrived at 7:17, John Magill arrived at 7:17, James Bownik, and Aimee Fairbrother. Others present: Wayne Leblanc of 1677 Peltier Lake Drive. ._ • , of -. n. •98 in. - Motion by John Magill to approve September minutes, subject to spelling correction for Tim Rehbine's name. Motion was seconded by Mary Capra. Motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS: Downtown Revitalization - A. Review of MN Design Team visit - Discussion was held between committee members that rated the visit a great success. Theresa Brenner stated that we have laminated copies of their ideas/plans, color slides, and a copy of the video from Saturday nights presentation at the school. Theresa Brenner also stated that Lucy Thompson and Penny Simonson from the Design Team will be contacting as for a six month follow -up visit. The Design Team is interested in a six month follow up to get feed back on how the community responded and also give additional advice. Several ideas for goal setting were discussed and will be brought up at the "Open House ". Wayne Leblanc stated that the reason that he attended the meeting tonight was to see what has been done so far, and inquire about how we take the next step. Theresa Brenner stated that we need to get the ideas out into the community and educate them on the suggestions that the design team had. There will be a follow -up article in the upcoming newsletter, as well as an article in the Hugonian. The Quad included a picture, and a "thank -you" note in dedication to the Design Team and all the volunteers that were involved in the visit. Mary Capra will also be putting together a thank -you letter for those people who donated money toward the Design Team Welcome banner. Tim Rehbine will get the addresses she needs. B. Open House Motion was made by Mary Capra to hold a follow up forum with the citizens and presenters on November 17, 1998. John Magill seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. There was a lengthy discussion about the open house that would allow residents to view the ideas and drawings created for Centerville by the Minnesota Design Team. It was decided that everybody; residents, presenters, volunteers, and city staff would be invited to the next EDC meeting. The meeting would be held on November 17, 1998, in the council chambers at City Hall. The meeting would begin as an open house, at 7:00 p.m. and proceed to a follow up discussion around 7:30. All the drawings would be displayed, and the room will be set up so that there is room to move around comfortably. Residents will be notified by the outdoor City Hall board, and also through the community section in the Quad. Wayne Leblanc suggested having a sign -up board at City Hall for people who want to volunteer, that have not already signed up. Theresa Brenner said that we should have copies available of the "Citizens Who Want To Help" sheets. Presenters will be notified by Mary Capra. She will be calling all the presenters and inviting them. She will also contact Father Wolter at Saint Genevieve's Church. Volunteers from "Citizens Who Want To Help" will be called by Tim Rehbine and John Magill with in the next 2 -3 weeks. City Staff will be notified and invited by a brief presentation of downtown recommendations given by a member of the EDC at their respective meetings. City Council Meeting - Theresa Brenner Planning and Zoning - Mary Capra Park and Recreation - No decision made as of now Wayne Leblanc suggested that a member from each committee be at the open house and may be give a short presentation or follow -up on where their committee stands on the revitalization. Wayne Leblanc volunteered to open the discussion around 7:30, by giving a short follow - up presentation, which would include topics such as: 1. Developing volunteer core groups for each area of change. The group would select a leader representative and then "get to work" on the project. 2. Reviewing as a city every two months what's happening with each core group. After a while, we could review every three months. 3. Getting together with Anoka County about County 14 issues, as well as other issues. 4. Identifying resources of who can help, and where to begin. 5. Focusing on getting to the finish line. Design Team - Ideas in Action School Sign - Centerville Elementary School Improvement Task Force Chairperson, Pam Rennaker, was approved for $5500 to be used for a new Centerville Elementary School sign. The sign will be lighted and have interchangeable letters to communicate events, fund raisers etc. Mary Capra passed out a pamphlet showing several different sign proposals drawn by J.M. Stewart Corporation. There is some question on how the electricity will get to the sign. One idea is to speak with Rivard Electric to see if a separate meter for the sign can be installed, and find out through them where the electric wires can be run. Fencing - Mary Capra stated that voting will soon take place for the removal of the fencing that surrounds the school parking lot. Some people want to keep the tall fencing because it stops the garbage from Kelly's Korner from blowing onto the schools property. The City really wants all the fencing removed. Jim March says that the City would remove the fencing if approved. Mary also stated that there are many left over trees at the tree farm, and the City could plant the trees in the area where the fence was. Pier - Wayne Leblanc stated that he knows who to contact in reference to the pier that was recommended for Peltier Lake. Community Center - Mary Capra stated that someone needs to get in touch with the Archdiocese and let them know the ideas that were given which involve Saint Genevieve's Church, rectory, and property. There is talk of combining churches in the future, but no decision has been made. The church feels that they have adequate worship space, but need additional space for Faith Formation Classes. Star City Goals and Objectives A brief discussion was held, and it was determined that there was nothing new to report. Mary Capra stated that the Star City issues were blended into the downtown revitalization discussion. Studebaker - No update Heritage Museum - Mary Capra stated that she has spoken with Hal Leibel, and he has expressed interest in donating several old artifacts, and newspaper articles to the museum. NEW BUSINESS EDC Vacancy and Timeframe - The vacancy is listed in the Fall Newsletter, and may also be put up on outdoor City Hall sign to notify residents of this vacancy. Tim Rehbine asked Wayne Leblanc if he would be interested in filling the vacant spot on the EDC Committee. Wayne stated that he would like to wait and see what other areas the EDC Committee focuses on, but he will consider the opportunity. Next Meeting.Agenda A. Vote for the City Person of the Year Award B. Vote for Business Person of the Year Award. (Ballot forms were passed out by Theresa Brenner.) Theresa stated that she will include the list of previous years winners in next packet. Christmas Party Tentative date is December 5th at Kelly's Korner. Adjourn - Motion to adjourn at 8:20 p.m. was made by John Magill. Motion seconded by Mary Capra. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully Submitted, Aimee Fairbrother CITY OF CENTERVILLE PARK AND RECREATION COMMITTEE OCTOBER 7, 1993 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Park and Recreation Committee of the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on October 7, 1998 at City Hall. Dale Larson called the meeting to order at 6:50 p.m. PRESENT: Dale Larson Steve Brown Don Bahneman ABSENT: Chairperson Michael Navin • Doug Porter STAFF: Jim March James Bownik CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES May 6 1998 - Minutes approved. September 2. 1998 - Minutes approved. Motion to approve the May Meeting Minutes by Dale Larson. Motion seconded by Steve Brown. Motion carried unanimously. Motion to approve the September Meeting Minutes by Dale Larson. Motion seconded by Steve Brown. Motion carried unanimously. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS Gary Schmidt of 7071 Cottonwood Court expressed his interest in seeing a Footbridge connecting Cottonwood Court and Brian Court. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Clearwater Meadows Footbridge Upte - Michael Navin The committee discussed the possibility of building a walkway bridge. Staff was directed to research past Minutes of the City Council and Park and Recreation Committee to see why it was never passed. J ,aMotte Park Grading_ pdate Jim March, City Administrator, presented an update to the Committee. Everything is on schedule. Boards will be put up around the hockey rink October 23 -24 with the help of volunteer labor. The hockey rink should be ready to use this winter. Mr. March also mentioned that the City has received sealed bids on a new snow tractor. No action needed. Center Villa (Lake Area Utilities - 6994 20th Avenue) - Mr. Willie Lessard Mr. Willie Lessard presented a preliminary plat proposal for the Center Villa Development. Mr. Lessard acknowledged that a few trees would be lost in extending the sidewalk to Brian Drive. The issue of park dedication fees was also discussed. Mr. March presented a hand -out of a survey on park dedication fees which was conducted by the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. Motion was made by Dale Larson to recommend that the City Council accept $900 per lot or 10% of the value of the raw land, whichever is higher, as park dedication fees for the Center Villa Development. Motion seconded by Steve Brown. Motion carried unanimously. Dale Larson noted that the Park and Recreation Committee should consider recommending to the City Council an increase in the per lot fee for park dedication as per park dedication survey. Buechler Estates (Mound Trail Develonment) Mr Carl Buechler The issue of park dedication fees was discussed. Mr. March noted that in all past cases the fee per lot has always exceeded the value of the land. Motion made by Dale Larson to ask Chairperson Michael Navin to represent the Park and Recreation Committee at the October 14, 1998 City Council meeting and submit a recommendation concerning the park dedication fees. Motion seconded by Steve Brown. Motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS LaMotte Park Winter Schedule Applicants are needed for the warming house for January and February. Also discussed possible concessions or vending at the hockey rink. No action needed. DISCUSSION ITEMS • November Agenda I) Clearwater Meadows Footbridge Update 2) Buechler Estates (Mound Trail Development) - Park Dedication Fees 3) Lot Fee Adjustment for Park Dedication. • ADJOURNMENT Motion to adjourn made by Dale Larson. Seconded by Don Bahneman. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, James Bownik, Administrative /Planning Intern