Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1999-06-01 Packet
PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING AGENDA TUESDAY, JUNE 1, 1999 7:04 p.m. I. OPENING A. Roll Call H. PUBLIC HEARING (S) A. Variance Request - Pikiiian B. Rezone Request - Rehbein Properties HI. APPEARANCES IV. ACTION ITEMS A. Action Variance Request Pikilian B. Action Rezone Request - Rehbein Properties V. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. July Agenda Items VL CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES A. April 6, 1999 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes B. May 4, 1999 Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes VII. ADJOURN NOT APPROVED CITY OF CENTERVILLE PLANNING AND- ZONING COMMISSION WORKSHOP AND MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL --6, 199 Pursuant to due call - and noticetheieuf, the and - Zoning Commission ofthe City of Centerville held its regularly scheduled meeting and a workshop with the City Council on Tuesday; April 6, 1999, at City 1880 MahrStreet. PRESENT: Commission Members/Alt. Chair Linda Broussard Vickers JohrrBuckbee Brian Hanson ABSENT: Chairwoman Kathy Welk Allen LaMotte STAFF/ CONSULTANTS: Jim March, City Administrator Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk ********************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** OPENING Alternate Broussard Vickers opened - the Planning and Zoning meeting p m. II PUBLIC HEARING (S) Prior to opening the public hearing, Ahernate ChairMs. Broussard Vickers reminded those present of the guidelines for audience participation in Planning and Zoning Public Hearing Meetings. A. Rezone request (R&Rteasing) (DeerPass( Continued Ms. Gaustad updated the Commission on the proposed PUD - rezone for the Deer Pass development The developerMr: Gerald Rehbein approached the Commission and requested town homes, however, the Commission was not in favor of the high density nor rezoning the R5 (Executive Homes) to R2A. Mr. Rehbein complied wittrthe Commission's desire to complete the PUD requirements by addressing the City PUD forms and questionnaire: Mr. Rehbein (Developer) explained the propertyis examination from the DNR and Watershed District. There will be four wetlands mitigated to provide room for homes and road: The Commission confirmed no waterwill be directed onto another property. Ms. Gaustad noted a concern with the road width and one parcel sharing two driveways(accesses). The Commission opened the discussion. Mr. Brian Patterson (1975 -73 Street) requested clarification on the water drainage and mitigation. Ms. Jennifer Steward (1995 -73 Street) questioned the difference between an R2 - PUD and R5 zoning. Ms. Broussard Vickers noted the PUD is to embrace the natural property features and it authorizes some smaller lots. Mr. Tom Kennedy (1975 73s Street) waacnnrerned for children safety if to access acity park via 20t Avenue, Mr. March suggestedthat an easement can be included between lots 10 - and - t t; forfuturetrail way access. Ms. Steward questioned-if therow o£trees.between the. proposed development and 73' Streets be preserved Mr. Rehbein hoped to save the row of trees since their preservation would benefit the property and the sale of the same. Motion brMr. Buckbee, seconded Mr. Hanson to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. B. Preliminary Ptat(BeerPass) - Mr. Gerald Rehbein Alternate Chair Broussard Vickers opened the discussion. - Motion by Mr. Hanson, seconded byMr.. Buckbeeto the public Motion carried unanimously. C. Rezone Request - R2 to C t (1764 - Main Street) Mr. RogerKolsted Alternate Chair Broussard Vickers informed the crowd that the applicant, Mr. Roger Kolsted verbally rescinded his request to i ezone the property stated. However, the Commission noted an interest to hear residents comments. Ms. Linda Patterson (7065DupreRoad) questioned the Commission as to the reasoning why the request was rescinded. Ms. Gaustad replied that one of the two financial institutions did not believe that the community was populated enough to support two financial institutions. Ms. Carry Sanders (7080 Road)wondered why the City would considertnrezone the proposed property. Alternate Chair Brossard Vickers explained that any property owner reserves the rightta request to rezone theirpmperty. The City must hear all requests presented. Councilmember Nelson noted two E- mails; Mary Jo Helmbrechrand Udo and Cindy Wegmann (see attached). Ms. Norma Essex (7333 Mill questioned the between R2, R2 and -B-1. Mr. Wiliam Jostlin (2054 Willow - Circle) stated if the remains he will not stay in Centerville. Ms: Debra Kopps (205 Willow Circte)_gnestionedif the property is too - dense and without adequate parking. Alternate Chair Ms. Broussard Vickers replied that the public= hearing is to rezone the Mr. Koppshoped Centerville do a Forest Lake, as it pertains to the bright lights and commercial along the main strip. Councihnember Nelson explained that she receivedtwo E -mails in regards to the rezone request, one from Mary Jo Helmbrecht and another from Wayne LeBlanc_ Alternate ChairMs. Broussard Vicky's noted of Motion by Mr. Hanson, seconded by Mr. Buckbee to close the public hearing. Motion carried. III APPEARANCES A. Gerald Rehbein Torrens Mr. Rehbein asked the Commission to approve the Torrens request, in order that the bank owner can continue with the bank closing - on the property. Mr. Greg (County Bank) stated that he is looking forward to working with and moving into Centerville. The location has been approved bytheBankers3tateQhatLet and the purchase agreementwill be complete upon the approval of the land acquisition. Ms. Gaustad explained that Mr. Rellthein requested to subdivide a portiorrof his property in order to close the land deal with the proposed bank agent. The parcel in question, is located on the north corner of Main Street and the proposed2t" Avenue_ Mr. _Hanson noted the location as the exception on the map provider Ms. Gaustad iecuiiutteuded the Torrenstequestcomply with the lot split procedure. Therefore, holding a public hearing and notifying adjoining property atthe Council - meeting of Apt-it 28; 1999 meeting. Ms Ganstad suggested that the Planning Commission express their interest in regards to the proposed Totteus: Alternate Chau Ms. Broussard Vickeiscottuuented that the}ot meets with the minimal commercial lot size and it is within the zoning regulations. Mr. Owens said he was anticipating closing on the property anttmoving forward on the proje The Commission did not foresee any problems with the Torrens request. IV ACTION ITEMS A. Action Rezone PHD - Mr. Gerard Rehbein Alternate Chair Ms. Broussard Vickers commented that the proposal is keeping within the comprehensive plan, the houses wiltbe built according the R5 house regulations. A particular concern regarding the drainage and wetlands was noted and a suggestion to Council asking the grading and - elevations be exaniined to ensure compliance priortu the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: A trail easement should confect the proposed development with future developments. Mr. March explained that the trail easement carrbe presented to the - Park and RecreatiorrConuuittee_ In addition; the developer submitted a long and length application for a PUD. Alternate Chair Ms. Broussard Vickers supported the PUD and PretininaryPlatapproval based on the reasons stated. Mr. Buckbee noted the plan works with the unique land features. However, there is only enough for parking on side oftheroadand one property shares two driveways. Motion by Mr. Buckbee, seconded by Mr. Hanson to recommend approval for the DeerPass and Preliminary with the - addition - of the following: * A trail to the properties to the north * Final Comments from - Milo Bennett FireChief (cul- de- sacantlroadtwidth). *Final comments from the City Engineer (drainage and road construction): *Require a final - grading inspectimrpriorto issuing the certificate of occupancy. Motion tar 'MI unanimously. B. Action Preliminary Plat Request - Deer Pass - Mr. Gerald Rehbein Action noted above. C. Action Rezone Request - 142 to Cl Mr. Roger Kolsted ThrCommissiorr didnotmake - retumuucudation - because the request rescinded. D. Action Preliminary Plat Request - Mr. Mike Black Alternate Chair Ms. Broussard Vickers noted desire to have the properties developed prior to the sale of the lots, this will ensure the east property is not land locked. Ms. Gaustad questioned - how the developer planned to supply utilities to east property. Mr. Rehbein said he is working with the city on the utility issues. Motiorrby Buckbee, seconded Mr. Hansowto approve the preliminary for Royal Oaks Industrial lots, and to approve lots 2 and 3, with the road, and that the Commission acknowledges lots and 9 are less than the required 200' width; In addition, the Commission requested the roads and utilities are installed prior to the sale of the lots. Motion carried. E. Action Variance Request - Wolf (Accessory Building) Alt. Chair Broussard Vickers noted the Wolf variance request is tabled. F. Rezone Request - 131 to R2A (East Willow Glen) Mr. Buckbee commented the he prefeued nattorecou,unend to rezonetheproperty, since the property was zoned commercial for commercial use, and the Comprehensive Nan suppoi the - commerciai use and - the Cityhaslmted property. Alternate Chair Ms. Broussard Vickers referred to page 33 in the comprehensive plan and she preferred to protect i esidential areasfrom She dictnot subsu ibe tothe fact that commercial will make the taxes decrease. Mr. Buukbee explained the fig sl phase ofWillow Glen was authuiized - to - buffer the residential from commercial and Centerville does not have to be built in seven days. Mr: Hanson noted the Citydoesn'thave much cial property; thetowwhu will benefit the city immediately, but long range commercial may be a better benefit. Mr Dale - (Bright Keys}uoled that Ire hasbeena planner for 17 years in and the rule of thumb is to make the best decision for now because its difficult to determine what the future holds: In short, if irmakes sense at this point in then approve it. Town homes are selling fast and are good for the growth of the City. The £itymay want to waitfuu cuuuueicial, but some time. Councilmember Nelson mentioned that it is a difficult decision, why make the change. She also, suggested leaving propertyas commercial. Motion by Mr. Buckbee, seconded by Mr. Hanson to deny the rezone request from BY cu'mne, cial to R2A Single Family Residential, because it is notconsistentw,ith the Comprehensive Plan. Further discussion: Mr. Hanson stated that now a decision may be made in Nast. Mr. Buckbee, Mr. Hanson - aye - Alternate Chair Ms. Broussard Vickers nay. Motion V DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Review Proposed 151. Flood Damage Prevention 152. Mobile Home The Commission scheduled three Codification Workshops in order to discuss the proposed ordinance changes: The dates are April 20, April 27, and May 11, 1999. B. Consider Amendment to Ordinance #5 Discharge of Firearms - Tabled C. May Agenda Items: Review Proposed Ordinances: 153. Subdivision Regulations 154 Zoning Code Alternate Chair Ms. Broussard s explained R2 is residential,1t2A is high density B1 is commercial. A gentleman from (7069 Dupre commented thatabank will induce traffic and and the proposal is not in the Centerville Comprehensive Plan. Mr: Dale Peterson (7065 stated a commercial business a focal point and the area heavywith traf£tc. Furthermore, wilt - a traffic study be performed to a rezone approval. Alternate Chair Ms. Broussard Vickers explained that a traffic study might be irr the future. Motion by Mr. Buckbee, seconded by Mr. Hanson to close the public hearing. Motion carried. II; PreliminaryPlat = Mr. Mike Black Mr. Mike Black was present to discuss preliminary plat consideration for a 15 acre parcel Located on the east- side. of 20' Avenue and just north of Cedar Street. There, are nine lots proposed at a lot average of 1.5 acres less than 1 acre. Sewer and is available to the whole parcel. Mr. Ffanson discovered that the cur-de -sac rots wilt meet the 200rminunatlot width. Ms. Gaustad read aloud I -1 zoning regulations that there are 200' minimal lot width and 1 acre minimal Historically, on cut =dam sac lots - the city the minimal width at the building setback. Motion by Buckbee, seconded - by Mr: Hanson to close the publiclrearipg. Motion carried unanimously. E. Rezone Request - Bi to R2A (East Willow Olen) Mr. Rehbein stated approval of the rezone request will benefit the city in regards to park dedication funds, utility hook -up fees; MUSA cost and building fees. The Centerville commercial site may not sell as soon as the surrounding commercial properties. Ms. Gaustad distributed a copy of City of Lino Lakes comprehensive plan which suggested that the surrounding property is either commercial or industrial. The commission opened the discussipn. Ms. Essex commented the City needs increase the commercial tax base irrorder to lower taxes and she suggested the property should remain commercial. Ms. Carla Rudd (2071 Willow Circler said she would rather look at townhonres than commercial buildings. Ms.. Gaustad noted that-Ordinance #5 ofFirearms will be umpleted and ready for consideration at the next meeting. VL CONSIDERATION - OF MINUTES A. March 2. 1999 Planning and Zoning Meeting.Minutes Motion by Mr. Buckbee; seconded - by Mr. Ranson the 2 1999 Planning and Zoning meeting minutes with corrections. Motion carried unanimously. VII ADJOURN MotionrbyMr. Buckbee seconded - by Mr. Hanson to adjourn the April 6,1 99 Planning and Zoning meeting at 8:50 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully Submitted, Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk A 'HOT PR CITY OF CENTERVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MAY 4, 3999 - Pursuant to due - call and notice thereof- the- Planning Zoning Commission of the City of Centerville held its regularly scheduled meeting at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. PRESENT: Chairwoman - Kathy Welk Commission Members: Brian Hanson Linda Broussard Vickers Al LaMotte ABSENT: None STAFF /CONSULTANTS: JinrMarch, City Administrator Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk Paul Palzer, Public Director/ Building Inspector OPENING PUBLIC HEARING (S) ij :. ni a: - • 1 4.11 :ii � i , Mr. Paul Wolf was present to request a variance to construct an accessory building that had- be tabled by the Commission. The Commission shared with the is upei ty ownerthat tonight Commission - will deny the request or table it until after Ordinance #4 is near complete. The Commission did not want to grant a variance until it is aware whatthe consensus of the City is as it pertains to accessory buildings. Motion by Linda Broussard - Vickers - to - close the Motion seconded by Al LaMotte. Motion carved unanimously. Special Use Permit - Dennis - Sbndy Ms. Gaustad updated the Commission on the construction of a Redi -Mix business. Ms. Welk noted receipt of a letter nom Tonr and Patty Cannon (1818 Hayfield Rd:). Planning & Zoning May 4, 1999 Mr. Paul Palzer confirmed Ms. Broussard Vickers question regarding a Satellite that meets with the minimal facility requirements fora business. Mr. Brian Hanson confirmed MPCA will regulate the cement overage/droppings in order to protect the creek from needless - run off. Motion by Linda Broussard Vickers to close the public hearing. Motion seconded by Al LaMotte: Motion carried - unanimously. Variance Request - Killian Mr David Killian would like to remove a present - structure and replace larger facility to house a van and a workshop. The rear property is not usable and the neighboring property owners put in-a similau structure -that is within two -(2)- feet of the property line. The Commission granted a variance for that structure. Mr. Killian regnestedthe same consideration. Ms. Welk questioned Paul Palzeras to cuiieutpolicy. Mr. Palzer stated the cuurent policy reflects a three (3) foot building code, adding the City code is five (5) feet for emergency vehicle access. Mr: Killian - requested the Cormnissiorrgrant vauiance fora porcharc uujunction with the garage expansion variance. Ms Gaustad stated whetrarequestto the Ordinance is presented - to -the Commission, the City needs to notify the public of the proposal. In short, the City cannot add this-request to the existing varia«tcrequestwhicir has been published - dud noticed. Mr. Palzer added that the variance that was granted to the lot next door is Located in the B Commercial district. Furthermore 1695-Sorel- Street does not fall under the-accessory building regulation for residential properties. MotiorrbyLinda Broussard Vickers the public bearing. Motiorrseconded by Brian Hanson. Motion carried unanimously. Variance Request - Centennial District 12 Chair Welk read the Centennial School Districts request to install a sign near Main Street on the school parking lot. Mr: Palzer explained the approximate sign location encroaches on the 35' setback 10 feet. Motion by Linda Broussard dickersta close the Motion - seconded by AI LaMotte. Motion carried unanimously. APPEARANCES 2 Planing kZoning May 1999 v :14 1 1 r:i•i' ) , it 1 'u 11 1 111 ..1 Linda Broussard - Vickers removed herself 'rom the table, Ms. Gaustad gave an overview of the Goetz Landscaping request for preliminary grading drainage, erosion control and utility plan. Mr. Goetz explained they hoped to get approval to continue with construction plans. Af LaMotte -questionedifapprupiiatc pinking wdb calculated handicap parking. Also, has there been adequate green space allocated. Mr. Goetz confirmed the ibsucs. Mr DennyShap noted a 40% green space4ias been incorporated into the plan. Mr. Goetz an additional patio -will- be-included. Mr. March asked if Mr. Goetz planned to discuss contrasting architectural features of the proposed building. Mr. Goetz explained each view of the building: The north east elevation shows the front truck access. The east elevation shows the front of the building. Motion - by Al LaMotte t rreconnnend forwarding to City provided - parking space, green space and contrasting architectural features meet with Planning and Zoning approval. Motion - seconded - by - Brian Hanson. Motion carried - unanimously. ACTION ITEMS: 3 Y Ulf - • 1:14 ' i ■l • - 1 U - aIt &%111S' :1' • n,1 Motion by Linda Broussard Vickers to table until sufficiently discussed. Motion seconded AI LaMotte: Motion icil unanimously. Action Special Use Permit - Dennis Shudy Ms. Gaustad urged the COuuLLSSiorrto considel anlntelin Use Permit, Motion by Linda Broussard Vickers, seconded by Al LaMotte to direct Staff to construct an Interim Use Nina and r etvive City Attorney's approval subject to the following: Annual review and approval, with appropriate agencies granting permits: Motion carried - unanimously. i%s'tion on Variance Request - Killian 3 Planning & Zoning Mayo, 1999 The Commission explained the neighboring property owner was granted a variance due to the that dime was no gaiage mrsite. Also otherpcupmtyowners enjoyrights that are not shared by the neighboring property. The Commission discussed: Ordinance #4 Section: 65.03 -1 Special and circumstauc,es exist - which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and do not result from the actions the petitioner. The Commission discussed: * Possible safety hazards '- Dilapidated buildings may be - based recently adopted code. Ms Linda - Broussard Vickers expressed - cumuli, about non conforming issues and.the tabling of similar types of items. Ms. Broussard Vickers suggested to table until after Ordinance 44 is Motion Vickers, setouded by LaMotte to table this request until the Commission completes the research on Ordinance #4. Motion carried unanimously. CentenniafScbootDistrict Variants regire fur Sign The Commission discussed, in great depth, any way to grant the variance in conjunction with Ordinance-#4, Section: 65.03 -1 65.03 -2 65.03 -3 65 -.03 -4 Mr. Palzersuggested whenthe Couunissiuli iewiitesOrdinance #4: Signs, that perhaps the provision should be considered for properties contiguous to County Roads. The-Commission suggested- Staff nieasure theright-ofway and easement distaui,e: The Commission felt safer having the sign installed closer to Main Street. Furthermore, the sign ordinance will need to be -in ordertcrconside, pending concerns. Motion by Linda Broussard Vickers, seconded by Brain Ranson to table the Centennial School District's variance request install a based on fact it does not conform to the variance standards, and to update the sign ordinance in an attempt to re- address - the request in the future. Motion carried unanimously. DISCUSSION ITEMS: 4 Planning & Zoning May 4, 1999 Consider Request for ADA, The Commission suggested that Mr. Killian Council and requestthe variance fee be waived. Discharge of Firearms The Commission discussed - regulating and eliuui«atingthe discharge of firearms. Some argued to eliminate all use of firearms to ensure a safe environment for citizens, rather than allowing the and one - be hurt or scat e& The other algument was to restrict firearms, not to eliminate, because too may rights are eliminated. Enforcement can be challenging; and criminals will have Motion by Linda Broussard Vickers, seconded by Brian Hanson that no consensus was among theCommission - and ifthe its a pressing - issue, perhaps Council can hold a public bearing. Motion carried unanimously. RevierrProosr;ed Ordinance - 58-66 Motion by Chair Welk, seconded by Al LaMotte to table Ordinance 58 -66 until the next meeting Motion carried - unanimously. Letter on Resignation - John Bnckhee The recognized and- his years of service. Chaff, Welk suggested the City purchase a plaque that will identify who and when someone served on a Cowwruttes, Commission-orthe Councit The suggested that the member be recognized with a certificate of appreciation from the appropriate group. Chair Welk thought plaque may promote involvement. Motion by Chair Welk, seconded by Brain Hanson to recommend to the Council to give consideration to hanging - a - plaque at City HallforCouncil, Commission and Committee members that have served a minimal of two years, and recognize the person with - a - certificate ofappr Motion carried - unanimously. June Agenda Item: Variance Request for The Commission established May 18, and May 25, as workshop dates, both meetings will take place at 6:00 p.m.. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES: April 6. 1994Planning_antt ning Meeting - Minutes Motion by Linda Broussard Vickers, seconded by Chair Welk to table the April 6, 1999 Planning and Zoning Meeting Motion unanimously. ADJOURN: 5 Planning & Zoning May 4, 1999 Motion by Linda Broussard Vickers, seconded by Al LaMotte to ad the May Y adjourn Y 4,1999 Commission meeting. Meeting adjourned at 10:22 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk 6 iriance only if it conforms to the following standards: 65.03 -1 - Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and do not result from the actions of the petitioner; 65.03 -2 - Literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the petitioner of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance; 65.03 -3 - Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district; 65.03 -4 - The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the surrounding area, or in any other respect impair the public health, safety, or welfare of the residents of the city. 6. AMENDMENT. 66.01. IN GENERAL. This ordinance may be amended by following the procedure specified in this section. 66.02. INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS. Proceedings for amending this ordinance shall be initiated by at least one (1) of the following three (3) methods: (1) By petition of an owner or owners of property which is proposed to be rezoned, or for which district regulation changes are proposed. (2) By recommendation of the Planning Commission. (3) By action of the City Council. An amendment not initiated by the Planning Commission shall be referred to the commission for study and report, and the council shall not act on the amendment until it has received the recommendation of the Planning Commission or until sixty (60) days have elapsed from the date of reference of the amendment without a report by the commission. * 66.03. ACTION BY PLANNING COMMISSION. Before any amendment is opted, the Planning Commission shall hold at least one public wring thereon after a notice of the hearing has been published the official newspaper at least ten days before the hearing. 44 David & Margaret Kilian Khans Detailing and Design 1885 Sorel St Centerville, Mn 58038 Telephone (651)853-0374 Fax (851)752 TT1615 To whom it may concern: I would like to join the planning and zoning committee. I have experience in framing homes and a two year certificate from St. Paul Technical Vocational Institute in Construction Technology, which is the design of commercial and residential properties. I also own my own business designing and detailing commercial structural and bulk storage systems. Sincerely: David P. Kilian tervi Cle 1880 Main Street • Centerville, MN 55038 Established 1857 CITY OF CENTERVILLE (612) 429 -3232 • Fat (612) 429 -8629 APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE OR REZONING VARIANCE FEE REZONING DATE PAID STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 6 7 `J = ra;:e L • LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: SIZE OFPARCEL(S) 7 _S ' 1 i00 PROPERTY OWNER: DAL' i 0 /< I t,10-1- I PHONE # E 5 >' 7 ? FEE OWNER: t J A - V it l ' L i ,4 I ADDRESS: ( 3o 6-al--- APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY: FEE OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER _ LEASE HOLDER OPTION TO PURCHASE DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: per, E /3 C: i t- 11 l ^ --r- pc 2c 1 -( REASON FOR REQUEST: RC& T'rt' u 67 * Plus any additional costs Signature of applicant incurred for engineering, legal fees, publication or Signature of property owner other requirements. Date David & Margaret Kilian Italians Detailing and Design 1995 Sorel SL Centerville. Mn 55036 Telephone (651)8530374 Fax (651)762-T11615 To whom it may concern: I would like to rebuild my front porch so that my wife can access the house. She is permanently disabled and has a hard tome getting in the house the way it is now. Also the porch is rotted and an eye sore. Sincerely: David P. Kilian tip/ v i t • e 1880 Main Street •Centerville, Mho 55038 Estad!ufiedlB57 CITY OF CENTERVILLE (612)429 -3232 • Fax(612) 429 -8629 APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE OR REZONING VARIANCE FEE 050 .00 REZONING 1X DATE PAID S/10 / Q STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Not Available LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of Sec 24 Twp 31 Rge 22 LYG NLY of S662.45 ft. PIN# 24- 31 -22 -32 -0003 SIZE OF PARCEL (S) 20 Acres PROPERTY OWNER: Rehbein Properties PHONE # 651/426 -1345 FEE OWNER: Rehbein Properties ADDRESS: 6805 - 20th Avenue South , Centerville, MN 55038 APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY: n FEE OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER LEASE HOLDER OPTION TO PURCHASE DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: To rezone from 11.1 to Industrial. REASON FOR REQUEST: To create consitency with industrial park. * Plus any additional costs �gna incurred for engineering, legal fees, publication or ature of property owner other requirements. Date • — l 19a II . a' f .:11 n A I I l 2 /u • al I � t I s E r s / ' \ � \ 44 ferret", PO � n 6S nn 192> ® t991 I QO % / 1 4 0 T GLE N . )t,f c / LL: ail 01.111_07 B / T '9 11973 1 :979 1 I 19)9 I....„. I H "— / _ i 1970 1 Iceo 1 320 1990 1 ry .m „ I - 2 050 2070 - Q I �xo v —= -- Is I r w I ♦ 5. i 'a / I Iii 2 sAj l '� I �� .fi �- n a l a I 1 ., 1 4.1 I t 1 4 . _ -� � '&g � I � � 1 r o 7 � r1 I _ 1 ( I bam p —`� r� 0 I 43 Cr 111¢ i 1 > 1I° 9 ,, d 1 — ', rl 0 0 1I 3 -' -- A l a I i. � ;'� — — — 1 — — -- — ��. • I .I NOT APPROVED CITY OR CENTERVILLE PARK AND RECREATION COMMITTEE May-5; 1999 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Park and Recreation Committee of the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on January 6, 1999 at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. Acting Chairperson Dale Larson called the meeting to order at 6:47 p.m. Present: Acting ChairpersorrDale E argon Steve Brown Doug Porter Terry Sweeney Absent: Michael Navin Don Bahneman Staff. Jill Lien CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES March 3, 1999 Park and Recreation Meetin¢ Minutes- - Tabled ril 7 1999 Park and Recreation Meeting Minutes - Tabled - Dale Larson requested staff to check into the approval of the name Royal Meadows Park - Council approved the name Royal Oak Park. It should be Royal Meadows Park. APPEARANCES PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS Mr. Dale Larson expressed concern over the - type of shelter the Neighborhood Network Committee is proposing for the Acorn Creek Park; moreover, if they are proposing a shelter at all. Mr. Larson wanted to make sure the Park and Recreation Committee is still intending to recommend some type of shelter. Mr. Larson has received materials from different vendors on gazebos and shelters. He questioned the style the Neighborhood - Park and RecreatiowMay - 5 - > 1999 Network Committee was looking for. Mr. Larson expressed interest in putting in a shelter at the Tracey McBride Park also. Mr. Terry Sweeney explained hethought =the Neighborhood "Network Committee was trying to go with the "old town" feel or theme that the Design Team suggested. This is where the Neighborhood Network Committee came nix with the name "gazebo ". Mr. Steve Brown expressed he would like to see a shelter Large enough to hold family gatherings and picnics. He also mentioned the -whole purpose for the Acorn Parr is geared for families and adults in a quieter atmosphere. Other parks such as LaMotte Park are geared for more athletic purposes. Mr. Brown also stressed that there. is approximately 50 feet of shoreline that is open for public use. He still has problems with children walking through his property as-they make - their way around the-pond. These kids need to understand this is private property, and a lot of the homeowners are getting upset with the traffic behind their houses at all hours -of the day and night. Mr. Larson stressed again that this park should be able to be used by all ages - both young and old. Mr. Larson distributed a tetterfrom Mari Nelson which also requested a park be designated for adults, with a quieter more peaceful atmosphere. Mr. Sweeney suggested the City put in-a retaining wall and possibly do some landscaping, maybe even adding trees. The trees would act as a sound barrier, and in a sense, separate the park into two. The play area would-be separate from the shelter area, giving it the effect of two different parks. Mr. Sweeney mentioned that children play and fish in the pond all of the time, adding, in the winter they slide down the hill onto the pond. Mr. Porter questioned where the funds will come from to pay for all of these suggestions. Both Mr. Sweeney and Mr. Brown explained the -funds will be coming from the grant the City has applied for offered by the County. With this grant the county will grant $50,000.00 to the City, and the City will-in turn-match $50000.00 giving a total of approximately $100,000.00. Mr. Sweeney stressed the importance of upkeeping the -City parks. The parks would be used a lot more by our residents if they were kept up better. The grass needs to be fertilized and weed killer needs to be used. Mr. Sweeney suggested hiringa schoot aged person to oversee the upkeeping and maintenance of the parks. Mr. Porter suggested hiring an intern. Ms. Lien offered this person could also be carried over into the fall and winter with the warming house at LaMotte Park. The warning house needs someone to oversee the maintenance, scheduling and general running once winter arrives. Possibly, this person could stay on all year. 2 Park and Recreation May 5, 1999 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 11. - • ' - • • u - 1 • kaa% .e 1 1 1 < - . - Tabled • Update on Anoka County/LaMotte Trail Issue - Tabled NEW BUSINESS I (etter from Laser L ight Technologie Inc. Ms. Lien explained a letter she-had received from Karen Seeley of Lazer -Light Technologies. Lazer Light Technologies offers fund raisers with Lazer Scribed Bricks. The Park and Recreation Committee - briefly looked- information and discussed the information. The general consensus of the committee was that the City and/or Park and Recreation Committee is not ready or in-the need -of afund raiser. Park and Recreation Committee Sponsored Youth Activities Ms. Lien asked the Park and Recreation Committee if they wanted to pursue- sponsoring events for the children of Centerville. Such events would include: kite flying, track and field, softball tournaments, volleyball tournaments, bike racing, etc. The general consensus of the Park and Recreation Committee was that there are so many events offered through Lino Lakes, Centennial School District and surrounding conununities that they didn't feel the need to offer them through Centerville. Mr. Brown felt it all came down time and money; adding the Park and Recreation Committee volunteers their time for City issues. Adding, that not many of the members have time to help with outside events. Mr. Porter felt it would be-something to do for fun, adding -that maybe the City could offer prizes. Mr. Larson mentioned that in Lino Lakes, not everyone volunteers, the City pays for their time Mr. Sweeney clarified, only Park and Recreation are paid in Lino Lakes. Mr. Larson suggested that maybe it is time for the City of Centerville to consider hiring a Parks and Recreation Director. Mr. Brown-didn't feel the City has the need nor the money for that position at this time. DISCUSSION ITEMS Mr. Larson brought attention to the condition of the slide-at Royal Meadows Park. Basically the slide is shot, and ready to fall down. It needs to be removed. Also, the swing set is in poor condition. Mr. Larson stated that he had already spoke with Mr. Paul Palzer (Building Official) about purchasing a new swing. Mr. Palzer told Mr. Larson that it would cost the City approximately $400 - $600 to repair the current swing. It would be more beneficial for the City to purchase a new swing. Motion by Dale Larson to have Public Works remove the slide at Royal Meadows Park. Motion seconded by Doug Porter. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 3 Park and Recreation May 5, 1999 Mr. Brown requested that the Park and Recreation Committee wait until the next meeting to discuss removal of the swing. He felt it would be best if the committee members had an opportunity to look at the condition of the swing before they made any motions to remove or purchase new equipment. Mr. Larson wanted to offer his commendations to the new City Council He -felt wertow have an excellent City Council filled with good people, and wanted to stress his appreciation. July Agenda Items 1. Update on St. Paul Water Utility. 2. Update on Anoka County/LaMotte Trail issue. 3. Progress of field condition, equipment, dug outs, pavement, and what's going on at LaMotte Park. 4. Removal of swing at Royal Meadows Park. 5. Status of naming of Royal Meadows Park - Council named Royal Oak Park. 6. Update on Acorn Creek Park (Letter from Mari Nelson and Neighborhood Network Committee). 7. Status of notification to residents regarding easements and Trail Linkage Grant. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Doug Porter to adjourn the May 5, 1999 Park and Recreation Committee Meeting. Seconded by Steve Brown. All in favor. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Jill Lien Secretary 4 NOT AF a DIVED CITY OF CENTERVILLE SPECIAL MFETLNG TUESDAY, MAY 4, - 1999 Pursuant to call and notice - thereof, theCity Counci o fthe City ofCenterviHeheld a special meeting on Tuesday, May 4, 1999 at City Hall, 1 880 Main Street. PRESENT: Mayor Wilharber Council Members: Theresa Brenner lick Travis Terry Sweeney Mari Nelson ABSENT: None STAFF: Jim March Ry -Chel Gaustad Paul Palzer Mayor Wilharber called the special meeting to order at 5:00 P.M. CENTER VILLA DEVEL©PMEN- 1CON-TRACT Mr. March gave a brief presentation on the proposed Development Contract for Center Villa. The contract was discussed to which administrative changes. Mr. Lessard - requested the - Council to decreasethe uuvunt indicated in the - Developers Contract for silt fencing, since the average foot is $1.50 and there is not more than 500'. The Council denied Mr. Lessard's request to for silt fencing. Mr. Lessard recalled from a past Council meeting that the City planned to pay the watermain oversizing cost. Mayor Wilharber recalled - a discussion in regards to paying the watermain oversizing cost, however, he was not clear on what action the Council took. Staff was directed to research the minutes and Council tape to - determine if the watermain oversizing issue was discussed and if Council took action. Councilmember Nelson read aloud excerpts of past minutes regarding Center Villa subdivision. The Council elected to change page 9 - #10 to read as follows: StulnrWater fees. The storm water feeshalfbe paid the prior of the final plat. This fee is $8,983.65, based on a charge of $.01546 per square foot of 13:34 acres of platted area, Mr. March explained that the letterofcl edit will be150% multiplied bythe of $55,155.00, thus being $82,725.00. The streets and utilities will be 125% ,of same. The - Council the Develapersald Builders final) iai responsibilities ii1 conjunction with installing driveways, maintaining the building site and silt fencing. After the Council discussed cost the tuuk the following 1/ • t •II•IJ1'. 111• 1 -1. • I1'11 .'1 1'1. I i(Ib K 1111111(N1 1l I Jl 1 Lc; N {"1 IL' 4+''.14 11.11111 • 1 11.' 1 ' '.l 1 14E 1 11111. Motion carried unanimously, The Developerexpressed hisdisappointed when he ofthe extra - hidden associated with the subdivision. The Counl.il discussed and requcstedsidewalks mrthewest side of Brian the north side of Eagle Trail. Mr. Lessard argued the new proposed section of sidewalk (lots 16, 17, 1 and - 19) had notbeen-discussedpreviously. Mr. Lessard requested the Council to waive the $5000 asphalt trail fee. The Developer planned - to pay $1200 per totforpark dedicatiu(rfees: The Council disLussed use of the commercial property which the trail is proposed to cross over. And since, no future was determined - the Council entertained notpaviug the trail. IbtayorWilharber agreed to waive the $5000 trail fee. Councilmember Nelson agreed to waive the trail fee. Councilmember Sweeney ag( cud tuwaive the -$5000 only because ofthe unique situation- Councilmember Travis concurred as long as the trail is class 5 limestone and the sidewalk - is installed in lieu of the $5000: Councilmember Brenner voiced - the desire to keep the $5000. U1 "1' 1 - • 1 AH un1114' 4k 14 ► • ' It 1 '11 1.11_1 the $5000 trail escrow from the Developers Contract with the limestone trail • 1 • - 1' -111 L. -1 11 11 1' 4 1 1.114111 1 • - 1 1 • 11L4 111' . • 1 . _ •11 • , •1•.1 , II 1' 1111 • 1• If •' Trail. lots 16.17.18 &19. 1 - • :1 1 1 ' ' 14 k ■111 1 - + 1 • J' . • . 4 4 V_ ( • l1/ 1. WIN •• Councilmember Travis suggested in future development contracts indicate all fees. Mayor Wilharber stressed to Staff developers should be made aware of alt possiblecost prior to the final stages of a subdivision or development contract. LAKE UTILITY Mr. March - briefed the Council -on Lake - Area - Utility's building and the proposed agreement. Mr. March noted that he was able to get the environmental first phase $50-• less than the original quote $1200: Therefore; the City elected to hire Environmental which is a subsidiary ofBonestroo instead of Nova. During a phone conversation with Mr. Pete1 su11 he iIldiLated hat a Builestroor concluded -City Hall property may be an appropriate site for a watertower. The - Council and Staff discussed thepurchase - of theEake Area Utility - building as a potential future site for Building Inspections/Public Works and a watertower. The Council discussed other optional - sites - fora watertower; such -as the property located directly behind City Hall. After reviewing the property appraisal for the Lake Area Utility's building and outlet - A, the - Council electecttopursuethe building the The Council discussion regarding the purchase price of $400,000 for both the building and outlot A, provoked the following - action: • U 1 'it i • • 11' -u r• 11 • ••••• 1 • -c • 11'11x _ i 11 known - that the City_is not interested imvnrelrasing the -Lake Area Utility's outlet A Motion carried unanimously,. Mr. Marelr shared the market value-for-the-property is-appraised between -$3- 1+000• to $332,000. however, the asking price is $325,000. The Council discussed assessments, water and - sewer hook up charges which total approximately $6,662. Motion by Councilmember Sweeney, seconded by Couneilmember Nelson to it i ! #4 - Illy • 1 1 ' 1 li 1111it3I ;11IM'1i1 Mlilt - 11i1 t ir31:i 1 • iii\ i tie • ', .% • I I 1. 111 1 It 1 1 •1. ' -• r. it ; � 1' 1 seller cap existing w Il. waive the focal - SAC and softest the Metropolitan Council fee from Mr. Lessard. Motion carried unanimously, OVER WEIGHT PERMIT The City received an overweight permit from Mr. Jim Langer (J &D Lw dseaping) to transport three, seven ton loads on Heritage Street and LaMotte Drive. • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 rl' ilk ti11 ' l i i l i i_ ilii i 1 1 1 • ' i ■Liui1 the request. Motion carried unanimously. ORDINANCE #4 WORKSHOP DATE. It was mentioned that EDC would like to review Ordinance #4 prior to its adoption. The Council scheduled an Ordinance #4 - rewrite workshop with the Planning Commission, May 25, 1999 at 6:00 P.M. 1999 SFAI, COAT BIDS Mr. March indicated the lowest seal coat bid was received from Allied Blacktop. 1 '11 1 1 1 . - 11 . 111' .Vi 111'1_1 1.1 '111' . 1 . ' 1 the street improvement items as men tioned in the specifications. Motion carrie unanimously,. The Council requested Staff ask Allied for a quote on an overlay and report the results back to the Council. The Council suggested the Circle Pines - Lexington Centerville Police Department's letter of recognition, from Clara Lucking be placed in the next newsletter. Respectfully Submitted, Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk APPROVE; CENTERVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMTTTEE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 20, 1999 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Centerville Economic Development Committee held their regular scheduled meeting on April 20, 1999 at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. Present: Councilmember Dick Travis EDC Chairperson Tim Rehbine (7 :17) Committee Member Mary Capra Committee Member Paul Momain Committee Member John Magill(7 :15) Committee Member Lori Dorn Staff: Aimee Fairbrother, EDC /Staff Liaison Absent: None Appearances: Dennis Johnson from Minnesota Displays and Graphics CALL TO ORDER Committee Member Paul Montain called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. APPOINTMENTS Chairperson Tim Rehbine officially welcomed Lori Dorn as the newest r, of the Centerville Economic Development Committee. Ms. Dorn thanked the committee, and indicated that she is looking forward to serving on EDC. APPROVAL OF MARCH MINUTES Motion by Mr. Montain to approve March-16; 1999 meeting minutes. Mr. Rehbine seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF DESIGN TEAM SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES Motion by Mr. Rehbine to approve the March 25, 1999 Design Team Special Meeting minutes. Ms. Capra seconded the motion All favor. Motion carried unanimously. 01.1) RFJSINFSS r - - 4- DESIGN TEAM - "IDEAS IN ACTION" A. Heritage Museum: Ms. Capra commented that she has contacted the Heritage Preservation Commission. - hr a letterfio u thetVIIIItussion t hey indicated howto go about preserving communities. There are some grants available to survey the buildings, but funds are not available to theactual buildings Ms. Capra iswillingto put together more of a presentation for next month if the committee would like. NEW BUSINESS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE 1999-BUDGET/BALANCE L is •e:1 ". •1111 "" 11 1.t:.11 - •1• "0 I J1111 11 Utl :•1 • "r all • - ;III a &J . IY - I1I!1011 Ira 11 - KUIb all : 1MIPr 1• I - i"1.1 • 7•I . : 1 enterprise account for the Economic Development Committee, All fiends and flume I JII.r •Y II • 11•)1y 'i • . .1' 'Ott . 11 111 a K• 111 i 1 .1114 •f r 4 ' Him 1 Motion c +lied nanimo 1 ly Aimee - Fairbrother stated that theret difference-between- the balance and budget. The current budget is $6500, but our current revenue is $373.67. The money that we have spent far this year is $294.46. 1999 BUSINESS APPRECIATION DINNER Mr. Rehbine indicated thatthe Business ApgreciatiorrDinnerwill be on May 1999 at 5:00. We will have our regular scheduled meeting following the dinner. Aimee Fairbrother will check to see whatwe decided -on for presentation of the The invitations will be the same as last year, and will be mailed out on April 27, 1999. A call- in R.S.V.P. will be recommendedbyMay7 1999. The would - add the banner donators to the list of invites. Committee member Capra stated that she will coordinate the fruit and veggie platters, the salads and desserts. Committee Magill stated that he will bring the meat and the soda. Mr. Magill added that he will provide the and grills, as welt as cook. Aimee will check itrto paper products and plastic silverware. Ms. Fairbrother will contact the Mayor and - Councilmember Brenner irrregardsta speaking-at the dinner. DESIGN TEAM SIX MONTH FOLLOW UP VISIT Ms: Capra stated that the follow up will held 12, 1999 at Elementary School from 10 a.m. - noon. Ms. Capra indicated that each task group leader should be asked to give a brief presentatiorr on progress- of their task - gnmp - thus far. Mary Capra stated that a letter would be sent to the task leaders in the next week or so. Citizens will be notified through an Spring newsletter, the and also via the cable channel. Businesses and residents that donated money for the "Welcome Banner" will also be invited - in - the " thank-you" letter going on April 21-, 1999: Ms, Fairbrother presented a letter that included a thank you, a brief follow up of Design Team Activities, and an invitation to attend the June 12 follow up meeting. Penny Simonson and Lucy Thompson of the Minnesota Design Team will invite the other team members Mr. Magill stated that he would provide the danishes and juice. Ms. Capra stated that she would arrange for the coffee paperproducts: Ms Capra rental of the microphone. The committee agreed not to rent the microphone for this event. Ms. Capra stated that she will contact Cathy Wyland at Community Service to rent the cafeteria. Ms. Capra also indicated that Theresa Brenner and herself were working on a six month survey to be filled by residents at up. PORTABLE EXHIBIT QUOTES Exhibit Idea #1 Dennis Johnsoirof Minnesota Displays gave a presentation on the possibilities of creating a portable exhibit display for indoor /outdoor use within the city. Aftergiving an overview of his company; Mr. Juluusurriudic,ated that he interested in assisting the committee with their display needs, although he is not sure if his company will be to the type of the committee is looking to create. Mr. Johnson stated that he needs to get specific information from the committee before any quote can be given. The following items were discussed: Timeline: End ofJuly Type Artwork: Sketches drawn Current is 30x42. Mr. Johnson stated that the sketches would have to be transferred into an electronic file, and then enlarged. Size and Structure: Somesortof that we attach to a platfu,u,, that would portray a sketch (s) of the Design Team visions. Mr. Johnson stated that we need to use a durable material to ensure prolonged Mn Johnson showed the committee a heavy plastic type material that his company uses. The plastic piece would show graphics that the committee choose, and be a frame posts With a display of this size, consideration of wind and safety factors must be taken. Mr. Johnson is not interested n building the woodexrframe- or posts. With a 4x8 size a bigger print of one image, and smaller images of some others could be displayed. Mr. Johnson suggested putting no- moretheu tinec-iwages on Flexibility of Display: We would like to be able to move the exhibit around the city from time to time. Places of possible school, city hall, church, Corner Express etc. Pulling out the images and going with a second set of images. Protection: The committee would liketo have- a replacableplastic coveringin - case, of vandalism, Mr. Johnson does not offer this this product, although the committee could purchase a piece of plexi- glasto screw over the top: r Set up/Tear down Maybe oncea- month. Period of Usage: 2 -3 years Cost: Anywhere from - a couple hundred - toa - few thousand: Costs included - would - be -the photographs, transparencies, mounting, printing, and design of the display itself Mn Jahnsorrstated that - he would get back thrcomrnitteewithin 1 -2 weeks with a quote. Exhibit Idea # 2 Aimee Fairbrother presented- anotheroption - fortherexhibit - submitted by— Crary of Graphic Exhibits Inc. The frame suggested by Mr. Murphy for the portable exhibit is the same type of sign found orrthe ofbusses: The would be weather r esistapt, and different sketches could be placed inside. The cost of this item would be about $200:06: Mr. Montain questioned - the - dwability and credibility of this type ofsigr, vs. Mr. Johnson's displays. John Magill suggested that ifwe crsign just fold it would be more beneficial. It would be easier to move, and if it was made somewhat weatherresistant we could - place - it - outside orinside: We do want to - have something so elaborate that it takes a lot of time to move, it most likely will not get done. The easier that move, the moreitwiWgerdope. Exhibit Idea 1 Ms. Capra stated that shewoutd - cheli with Bob Tlreirrof - White Bear Lake tcrfind - out if he can photograph the sketches with out glare. She also stated that she will check with Pro -Ex to get a cost on reproductions - on - a foam board. ADJOURN Motion - to adjourn at 9:20wasurade by - Mr - . Rehbint Motion seconded by Capra. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully Submitted, n i 'K11 Aimee Fairbrother EDC /Staff Liaison