HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-09-13 Packet CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2000 �� -
6:00 p.m. �°"
Y1• CALL TO ORDER
V Roll Call
V4. SET AGENDA
✓III. PUBLIC HEARING (S)
11• Northern Forest Products – Tax Abatement Hearing (Carolyn Drude
and Sid Inman) tietro- Z 44. o
1 IV. APPEARANCES /AWARDS U CVJ
Eagle Pass Townhome Association -
s s •.-ds
Rock'n Hollywoods at Kelly's Korner, Adult Sport Leagues (Bill
' ` Bisek) oT` 4" 1
trV. CO SIDERATION OF MINUTES
t1. August 23, 2000 Meeting Minutes
Vi i: ril 1114CA 1 ur LLA11V16
t h The City of Centerville August 24, 2000 through September 13, 2000
,s Centennial Fire District Expenses
` Hunter's Crossing Pay Estimate #1
✓VII. P TITIONS AND COMPLAINTS
14Da.. 54.3
VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
. Hunter's Crossing Financing – Juran and Moody (George Eilertson)
Resolution 00 -17 – providing for the issuance and sale of 5650,000
general obligation improvement bonds of 2000
Resolution 00 -20 – calling for an assessment bearing on September
27 2000 11- /. f !�
Vic Id7q 20 kn.( 1 /�*"r/ a Ddavw2 O it / m'.4/
Ili• NEW BUSINESS �
2001 Fete des Lacs Committee Structure (Ray DeVine)
71� Holiday Party
13'� Proposed Chain of Lakes YMCA
�(/ Storm Sewer Realignment —Lloyd Drilling (1873 Main Street)
(JS 2001 Budget
Resolution 00 -18 — approving tax rate increase
Resolution 00 -19 — approving initial tax levy
OK CONSENT AGENDA
14 COMMITTEE REPORTS
Y II. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
�) 1 efeHa foi4 9 57.4.4.17 > � "g-lo '' ; � � of ; �� r}-
4 1. ADJOURNMENT "'' ��4 1
MEMO
DATE : September 8, 2000
TO : Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM: Jim March
RE : Northern Forest Products Tax Abatement
Included in your packet is a letter that was received from Paul McDowell at Northern
Forest Products. Mr. McDowell illustrates a number of concerns that he has with the
original establishment of his tax increment district. Mr. McDowell further indicates that
he is desirous of expanding his business and mentions that he has discussed locating his
expansion in Hugo to be near rail access.
Mr. McDowell is requesting a five -year tax abatement as an incentive for Northern Forest
Products to expand in the community. The abatement would only be granted for five
years if there is an actual expansion. Only a one abatement would be granted, if
expansion occurred. If the Council is willing to grant this abatement, a new public
hearing will have to be held. The abatement would only be granted for the increased
market valuation, not for the existing building valuation.
Sid Inman and Carolyn Drude from Ehlers and Assoc. will be present to discuss this issue
with Council. Sid Inman will be bringing an impact analysis to show the costs of the
requested abatement. I believe it is quite important to keep this business expansion and
new jobs within the community.
orthern Forest Products �� f�RN F�
050 Main Street
Centerville, Minnesota 55038 3
?hone 651-429-9990
rex 651- 429 -99 tember 6, 2000
P
Mt Jim March rIaDUCeC
City of Centerville
1880 Main St.
Centerville, MN 55038.9794
Dear Jim:
1 would like to express my concerns regarding the proposed documents for the Clty Council
meeting on September 13, 2000.
There has been much discussion regarding the reasons for the tax Increment available being less
than the amount shown on the original payment schedules. I would like to comment briefly on
each item
1) Reduction in commercfal- industrial rates.
It has been stated that "most of the decrease" in the avallable tax increment is related to this
area. I do understand that the crass rates have decreased from 1997 through 1999. but 1 also
see that the Local Tax Rate multiplier has progressed from 134.036% in 1997 to 153.788% in
1999. This multipiter has effectively negated the reducton in the class rates. The bottom line
is that my property taxes have not gone down, if you evaluate the taxes in 1997 through 2000
assuming a flat market value.
I would imagine If I had the time or energy to delve Ito the formula for defining available tax
increment., I may discover that the Local Tax Rate multiplier has no bearing on the
calculation. This does not make sense to me but maybe this is how It Is defined in the "Tax
Increment Act I de know that this is In direct contradiction td the soirit of how the Tit
incentive was presented to mt by the former city administration. I did understand that
available tax Increment could be lowered by my taxes being lower, but that seemed like a
pretty even trade at the time.
2) 1997 market value of $327,700 vs. minirnum 5527,700
This item is very straightforward. Northern Forest Products obviously received the benefit of
paying a lower property tax than was assumed in the T1F documents for the first year. It
especially makes sense that Rehbein's payment schedule should not be impacted by this set
of circumstances.
I do have ar issue with how Eh ens computed the $17,255,72 "back taxes amount" I may
not be looking at this correctly, but I would think my additional taxes for the extra 3200,003 of
market value would have been approximately $12,331 (5200,000 x .046 x 1.34036), It seems
that this amount would then be reduced by some magic formula to come up with the available
tax increment that would have been generated from my additional payment. If my calculation
is correct, this will only make the ending balance at the end of the TtF district larger than
currenty presented. It would also make me even more skeptical tan 1 eiready am of whether
the most recent Ehler's schedules are represented with current and accurate information (the
2 and 8/11/98 payments to developer should be shown on the proper (Ines).
3) Larger- than - expected base value inflation factor
I believe that It was estimated at an earlier meeting that thls "small portion" of the shortfall
was approximately $3000. This appears to be an area that no one wants to spend much time
discussing, maybe because of the so- called insignificant amount, but maybe because of the
continued embarrassment to Ehlers and the way they handled this situation
10003 siana01Id SS31I03 Kd2B.LEOM C866 BZt TS8 TVd CZ : t1 OA 00/00/80
I -
I
This last item does come back to bother me, especially when I see a 557,000 ending oalance
assuming we do not build our expansion project in Centerville.
As I have mentioned In our previous discussions and meetings with Rehbein representatives,
I nave a strong desire to set this matter settled fairly for all parties involved. However, it
appears that everyone wants Northern Forest Products to assume the risks of the "what ifs"
and uncertainties relating to the future.
When we left the last meeting with all parties involved, the plen was to attempt to see if
something could be put together to reasonably account for the shortfall in the available tax
increment. What I see en the table right now is an approximate 557,000 end ctTlF district
balance and an offer for a $9300 tax abatement. It seems that every time Ehlers puts
together a new schedulee, the ending balance shortfall grows.
When you consider the `act that my original schedule showed Northern Forest Products
receiving 5200, 691.18 of principal and Interest over the 11 -year life, the fact that a 557,000
balance will remain is pretty significant. The possibility that this could even grow to be a
larger amount If class rates go down (without an actual true overall tax rate decrease to me)
makes me wonder how much of an incentive there was for Northern Forest Products tc locate
in Centervilie.
I am appreclative of your offer for the one -year tax abatement If this Is the only option we
have to reduce the spread between the original schedules and the current schedules, it would
obviously not make sense for me tc decline this offer. However, due to the fact that such a
large amount remains, 1 would not be willing to share more than Northern Fores; Products'
share of the shortfall. I will not algn ary documents until Rehbein's share of the exposure
relating to items # 1 & # 3 is evaluated end corrected in the payment schedules.
I do not feel thatt our future expansion plans should be relevant to resolving this situation. I
feel that if we decide to expand, our expansion should be viewed separatey in terms of a
community analyzing whether assistance should be provided for the expansion,
As we have analyzed our need to grow, we have determined recently that rail access could
be a significant factor in our ability to be competitive in a new product line we have a ently
introduced. I have lad discussions w th a oinmercial developer in Hugo regarding land that
is available on rail, and Hugo is offering TIF for these lots. My reason `for telling you this Is tc
be honest about the decisions we are facing In choosing the best option for our future.
My desire is tru:y to stay in, and grow our business In Centervilie. I would like to propose ar.
alternative solution for you to consider.
My proposal would consist of a tax abatement similar to what you are offering, but would
extend for 5 years after the TIF district ended, This could be similarly capped at the $25,000
annual amount, end would be contingent en Northern Forest Products adding a minimum of
5400.000 of market value sometime before 2002. I feel this would be a good incentive for us
to expand in Centerville, as the original TIF note would most likely be paid in full, AND we
would be receving an Incentive directly related to our exparslon that would be sign.ificant
enough to forego rail access. If this could be accomplished, t would feel it would not be
necessary to assess the Rehbein balance for the exposure related to Items # 1 & # 3 above.
If we did not expand In Centerville, the 1 -year tax abatement assistance would still be in
effect
1
Z0017i sw nC0ttd ,MS32aOd Nii�Za0N C688 87,4 TSB TY3 CZ :hT d3.e 00.60/00
I realize the timing of me suggesting this alternative is not the greatest for you with the
council meeting set for next Wednesday. I would be willing to look at something where we
could reduce the amount of paperwork that needed to be changed, but looked at my proposal
as something that could be finished at a Tatter date. assuming there was a favorable reaction
to the proposal.
A few other things we have discussed but I would like to get down in writing:
• 1 feel the wording of the new documents suggests that the 1-year abatement is being
provided to induce Northern Forest Products to expand. As we have discussed, this
needs to somehow be changed to make it vey clear that there are no strings attached.
• 1 need to have a schedule prepared by Ehlers with the current status of the notes once
we have resolved our issues. This must be accurate, and should at least have a good
"starting point° as of 9/15/00 documented and made part of the new agreement. 1 reafse
the schedule may change !n the Mure but we need to establish what the balance is at
the start of any new agreement 1 currently have about 15 different Ehlers schedules and
they are ail different
Please call me to review this letter at your convenience.
rely,
Paul McDowell
3
C00@J 61.1aaONd 1S3NOd NN3N.LNON C686 Hi' TS9 ZY3 tZ :tT MA 03.80!60
f
09 /11/00 City of Centerville Page 2
LIMITED REVENUE NOTE - TO LAND OWNER
PERIOD BEGINNING Period Beg. Accrued Principal Interest Total End PERIOD ENDING
Yrs. Mth. Yr. Days Balance Interest Payment Payment Payment Balance Yrs. Mth. Yr.
0.0 10 -26 1995 126 32,250.00 958.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 33,208.86 0.5 02 -01 1996
0.5 02 -01 1996 33,208.86 1,411.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,620.24 Increment 1997 16,315.95 1.0 08 -01 1996
1.0 08 -01 1996 34,620.24 1,471.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,091.60 increment 1998 24,400.58 1.5 02 -01 1997
1.5 02 -01 1997 36,091.60 1,533.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 37,625.49 Increment 1999 23,696.61 2.0 08 -01 1997
2.0 08 -01 1997 37,625.49 1,599.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 39,224.57 Increment 2000 12,066.00 2.5 02 -01 1998
2.5 02 -01 1998 39,224.57 1,667.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,891.61 Back Taxes 17,255.72 3.0 08 -01 1998
3.0 08 -01 1998 40,891.61 1,737.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 42,629.50 Cash On Hand 0.00 3.5 02 -01 1999
3.5 02 -01 1999 42,629.50 1,811.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 44,441.25 Gross Total 93,73486 4.0 08 -01 1999
4.0 08 -01 1999 44,441.25 1,888.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 46,330.00 4.5 02 -01 2000
4.5 02 -01 2000 46,330.00 1,969.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,299.03 09-15 -2000 48,812.03 5.0 08 -01 2000
5.0 08 -01 200 _ 45 48,299.03 0.00 48,299.03 513.00 48,812.03 0.00 Net Total 44,922.83 5.5 09-15 2000
Totals 16,049.03 48,299.03 513.00 48,812.03
Present Values 30,556.37 324.55 30,880.92
LIMITED REVENUE NOTE - TO DEVELOPER
PERIOD BEGINNING Period Beg. Accrued Principal Interest Total End PERIOD ENDING
Yrs. Mth. Yr. Days _ Balance Interest Payment Payment Payment Balance _ Yrs. Mth. Yr.
0.0 11 -01 1995 121 114,051.19 3,258.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 117,309.72 0.5 02 -01 1996
0.5 02 -01 1996 117,309.72 4,985.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 122,295.38 1.0 08 -01 1996
1.0 08 -01 1996 122,295.38 5,197.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 127,492.93 1.5 02 -01 1997
1.5 02-01 1997 127,492.93 5,418.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 132,911.38 2.0 08 -01 1997
2.0 08 -01 1997 132,911.38 5,648.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 138,560.11 2.5 02 -01 1998
2.5 02 -01 1998 138,560.11 5,888.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 144,448.91 3.0 08 -01 1998
3.0 08 -01 1998 144,448.91 6,139.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 150,587.99 3.5 02 -01 1999
3.5 02 -01 1999 150,587.99 6,399.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 156,987.98 4.0 08 -01 1999
4.0 08 -01 1999 156,987.98 6,671.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 163,659.97 4.5 02 -01 2000
4,5 02 -01 2000 163,659.97 6,955.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 170,615.52 5.0 08 -01 2000
5.0 08 -01 2000 45 170,615.52 0.00 43,110.23 1,812.60 44,922.83 127,505.29 09-15 2000
09-15 2000 135 127,505.29 0.00 6,086.39 5,374.80 11,461.19 121,418.90 5.5 02 -01 2001
5.5 02 -01 2001 121,418.90 0.00 5,915.57 5,160.30 11,075.87 115,503.34 6.0 08 -01 2001
6.0 08 -01 2001 115,503.34 0.00 6,166.98 4,908.89 11,075.87 109,336.36 6.5 02 -01 2002
6.5 02 -01 2002 109,336.36 0.00 6,127.66 4,646.80 10,774.46 103,208.70 7.0 08 -01 2002
7.0 08 -01 2002 103,208.70 0.00 6,388.09 4,386.37 10,774.46 96,820.61 New Value $550,000 7.5 02 -01 2003
7.5 02 -01 2003 96,820.61 0.00 18,043.36 4,114.88 22,158.24 78,777.25 8.0 08 -01 2003
8.0 08 -01 2003 78,777.25 0.00 18,810.21 3,348.03 22,158.24 59,967.03 8.5 02 -01 2004
8.5 02 -01 2004 59,967.03 0.00 19,175.15 2,548.60 21,723.75 40,791.88 9.0 08 -01 2004
9.0 08 -01 2004 40,791.88 0.00 19,990.09 1,733.66 21,723.75 20,801.79 9.5 02 -01 2005
9.5 02 -01 2005 20,801.79 0.00 20,318.01 884.08 21,202.09 483.78 10.0 08 -01 2005
10.0 08 -01 2005 483.78 0.00 483.78 20.56 504.34 0.00 End Of TIF District 10.5 02 -01 2006
0.0 02 -01 2006 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,374.62 0.00 Beginning Of Abatement 0.5 08 -01 2006
0.5 08 -01 2006 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,374.62 0.00 1.0 02 -01 2007
1.0 02 -01 2007 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,374.62 0.00 1.5 08 -01 2007
1.5 08 -01 2007 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,374.62 0.00 2.0 02 -01 2008
2.0 02 -01 2006 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,374.62 0.00 2.5 08 -01 2008
2.5 08 -01 2008 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,374.62 0.00 3.0 02 -01 2009
3.0 02 -01 2009 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,374.62 0.00 3.5 08 -01 2009
3.5 08 -01 2009 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,374.62 0.00 4.0 02 -01 2010
4.0 02 -01 2010 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,374.62 0.00 4.5 08 -01 2010
4.5 08 -01 2010 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,374.62 0.00 5.0 02 -01 2011
Totals 56,564.33 170,615.52 38,939.57 253,301.29 _
Present Values 88,266.02 20,793.77
PAYMENT TO NORTHERN FOREST: NEW VALUE:
Gross Payment Due $44,922.83 Current Tax Capacity 0
Minus: New Tax Capacity 17,789
Amount paid on 2 -10 -199 $10,790.22 Total Tax Capacity 17,789
Amount paid on 8 -11 -199 $13,374.87 City Tax Rate 0.49184
Back Taxes Due $17,255.72 Available City Tax To Abate 8,749.24
Net Payment Due $3,502.02
CV100 -03 Prepared by Publicorp Inc. Fp2000 -5 WK4
MEMO
DATE : September 7, 2000
TO : Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM: Jim March
RE : Eagle Pass Townhome Association
A representative from the Eagle Pass townhome owner's association is scheduled to
appear before Council. The representative would like to discuss enforcement of the
developer's agreement, street lighting in the development and concerns/issues with any
future development of the two outlots that would be tied to their association.
Jim March
To: Jim Halstrom
subject: RE: Council Meeting
Thanks for the e -mail! If you can get me any prepared statement you may have I can place
that item in the Council packet. The packets will be assembled and delivered tomorrow. I
will have public works address weeds that may have washed out in the street and that are
location of the portable toilet in the park and desired screening. The park and recreation
committee has been discussing this item. See you next week. JM
Original Message
From: Jim Halstrom [ mailto :jghalst @co.chisago.mn.usi
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 11:42 AM
To: jmarch @centervillemn.COM
Cc: thalstrom @allina.com; jwoodrow @gassencompany.COM; lamiller @mmm.COM
Subject: Council Meeting
Hi Jim. Just to let you know that the following will be attending next week's council
meeting from the Board of Directors of the Eagle Pass Single Townhome Association.
Jim Juhl, President; Tracie Halstrom, Secretary; Dan Witham, Board Member; Geri ,u oerner,
Board Member; Larry Miller, Landscape Committee; Jim Halstrom, Landscape Committee.
Jim Juhl and I will speak for the Association on maintenance of the development; sod
issues; street lighting; the park; and our concerns about the outlot. I'll keep it brief
and will have a prepared statement which I will get to you ahead of time. Thanks again
for your efforts on the street sweeping and weed cutting. I'm told that the street
sweepers really worked hard all that day, and then Swift came back later and cut the
weeds, and it looks a lot better, but the weeds went back in the street and are covering
gutters in places. Believe Swift needs to come back and clean up the weed cuttings on
'dewalks, streets, and gutters.
1
'
Single Townhomes of Eagle Pass Owner's Association
c% Tracie Halstrom, Secretary
6960 Dupre Rd
Centerville, MN 55038
September 8, 2000
Mr. Jim March
City Administrator
City of Centerville
1880 Main St.
Centerville, MN 55038
V References.
a. City of Centerville Ordinance #8, titled "Centerville Subdivision Ordinance ", as
amended.
b. Development Contract for Eagle Pass, between the City of Centerville and Gor -em,
LLC, developer of Eagle Pass, dated 9 December 1996.
c. Our letter, dated 12 November 1999, concerning insufficient street lighting.
d. Our letter, dated 27 July 2000, concerning construction site maintenance issues within
the Eagle Pass development.
e. Centerville City Administrator letter to our Association, dated 25 August 2000,
responding to d above.
2. Purpose.
To address to the City Council of Centerville our issues and concems with respect to the
on -going development of Eagle Pass; to request City assistance in enforcing current city
ordinances and agreements relative to Eagle Pass; and to make recommendations for future
oversight of subdivision developments by the city.
3. Discussion.
a. The single townhome homeowners of Eagle Pass were given control of our
association by the Developer on June 13, 2000. Of the currently planned 59 units in our
development, 39 are occupied and an additional 10 have been sold or are being built/maintained
as models. The prices of our units range from 3180,000 to over $240,000, and represent a
considerable investment to our homeowners, and a lucrative tax base for the city of Centerville
and Anoka County.
b. Our homeowners are generally proud of our individual units and with the ultimate
vision of our completed development. However, our issues and concerns with the developer
(Gor -em, LLC) and contractor (Swift Construction) relative to on -going site construction in the
development have existed since the first unit was occupied in 1997. Most of our issues and
concern are covered by existing city ordinance and agreement with the developer (references
la and lb above) and can be resolved by the city simply enforcing the same. These issues and
concerns, most of which are addressed by references lc and Id above, include the following:
Id) Regular Sweeping of Streets and Sidewalks throughout the development.
This is required periodically by agreement between the city and the developer, and until very
recently, has not been done. This should be enforced by routine inspections of the development
by the city.
Ongoing Pick -up of Construction Debris. Construction sites and open lots
in the development are often littered with construction debris and material. If not already
provided for, the city should require daily cleanup of construction sites by the contractor, and
removal of such material as pallets, concrete blocks, bricks, etc., when they are no longer
needed. Other cities require such daily site maintenance. Centerville should do the same.
K Regular Maintenance and Control of Weeds in undeveloped lots and along
sidewalks. This is required by agreement between the city and the developer, and until very
recently, has not been done. This should be enforced by routine inspections of the development
by the city. i
Silt Fencing at Construction Sites. If not already provided for, the city
should require silt fencing at all unit construction sites and undeveloped lots to inhibit the
erosion of soil onto the streets. Other cities require such fencing, and Centerville should do the
same.
i nspection of Site Grading and Sodding Practices. The agreement at
reference lb provides for four inches of comparable soil being emplaced prior to sodding. This
has never been done in our development. Sod is routinely placed over weeds, rocks, utility flags,
etc. Our grounds maintenance crew has never seen the likes of the inadequate grading and
sodding that exist in our development. The city should enforce this requirement as part of its'
routine building inspection procedures during unit construction, to insure both the required
proper grading and sodding topsoil.
C leaning of Storm Sewer Grills. Construction debris and weeds often block
( $(
these grills. They should be monitored by routine inspections of the development by the city and
remedied by the contractor when required.
-2-
7) Street Lighting. The issue of inadequate street lighting was first addressed to
the city council by reference lc. At that time, the city dicated that Christmas lights in
t3' th e
development made an assessment of this issue unfeasible, and deferred action until a time when
the Christmas lights were no longer present. Nothing has been done since that time. The
agreement at reference lb calls for "approximately 15 lights" and there are 15 lights in the
development. But "approximately" can mean 13 lights just as easily as it can mean 17 lights.
The bottom line should be that of what is required for adequate night vision and safety. Our
development is characterized by winding roads, and whole sections are left without adequate
lighting for safe driving and pedestrian traffic at night. We implore the council to immediately
review this issue through an on -site inspection with our association representatives.
1 ) Eagle Park Issues. We are concerned about the sport stand in the park and
what it is supposed to represent. We understand that discussions are on- going. Our own view is
that the stand is useless as a tennis court without fencing, and can best be utilized by simply
placing basketball goals on each end of the stand. With respect to the portable toilet at the
entrance to the park, we believe it can best be disguised by either landscape trees, or by fencing
that will disguise it while at the same time allowing for maintenance access.
V(9) Future Outlot Development. Recent sketches obtained from Swift's sales
representative are promoting the addition of 20 single townhome units in Outlot B. Prospective
additions include:
-- Five units directly off of Dupre and Street "C ".
-- A private road off of Dupre with 7 units.
-- An extension of Ojibway (existing private road with twinhomes) to have 8 units.
Since this involves 2 more private roads, the impact to our development is huge. Homeowners
(twin and single units) must pay for snow removal from these roads. We also need to build
reserve funds for future resurfacing. The extension of Ojibway would create even more
problems as that private road would be owned by two associations.
Our questions to the City are: Who is responsible for any sewer problems on any current or
future private road, the City or the Association? Is it possible to make these proposed private
roads into city streets? What specifications define a city street vs a private road?
According to our bylaws:
-- Statutory Notice from the MN Common Interest Ownership Act, Section 3 General
Description states: "Initially the common interest community will contain 59 units. It
is contemplated by the declarant and approved in principle by the City that the total
development will eventually consist of a total of 66 units."
-3-
-- Section 16.1 states: "The total number of units which may be included in the
additional property shall not exceed 18 units ".
Because of these statements in our bylaws, the 20 additional planned units would exceed
our association limits. We suggest that any new additions have their own association. We
do not want the responsibility of more private roads. It may even be a conflict of interest
for two separate corporations (associations) to own and maintain the same private road
(Ojibway). In addition, we do not know of any homeowners who were told prior to closing
that the Association owns and is responsible for the maintenance of existing or future
private roads; nor is there any disclosure of this in the b
p Y laws and declaration. We Y
assumed all roads were, in fact, city streets.
We appreciate the recent efforts by City Administrator Jim March (reference le above)
to correct some of the above deficiencies and to work and communicate with us on our issues
and concerns. Again, we are proud of the ultimate vision for our development; we just believe
strongly that certain construction standards should be maintained or initiated as addressed above.
We also have severe reservations about the incorporation of any outlots into our association.
The city of Centerville is evolving into a great community, and should lead the way in upholding
and maintaining those standards. Your every consideration of our issues and concerns is greatly
appreciated.
FOR OUR ASSOCIATION HOMEOWNERS:
JIM JUHL, President
TRACIE HALSTROM, Secretary
DAN WITHAL, Board Member
GERRY BURNER, Board Member
-4-
MEMO
DATE : September 7, 2000
TO : Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM: Jim March
RE : Rockin' Hollywoods at Kelly's Korner, Adult Sport Leagues
Mr. Bill Bisek would like to appear before Council to discuss two items. The first item is
the third annual Kelly's Korner Customer Appreciation Event. The Rockin' Hollywoods
will be performing outside during the evening on October 14 from 8 — 12. There will
also be a hog roast. Mr. Bisek is requesting a noise permit for this event. I do not recall
any complaints from last year's event.
The second item Mr. Bisek would like to address is adult sport leagues. Mr. Bisek would
like to see the City have indoor volleyball leagues and boot hockey or broomball leagues
in the winter. Mr. Bisek would also like to see an adult softball league operated in the
summer months. Mr. Bisek appeared at the Park and Recreation Committee meeting on
September 6 The Park and Recreation Committee is supportive of the concept. Mr.
Bisek would like to approach the Council and discuss his concept in more detail.
Not Approved
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 23, 2000
6:00 p.m.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly
scheduled meeting on August 23, 2000, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street.
PRESENT: Mayor Tom Wilharber
Council Member Dick Travis
Council Member Terry Sweeney
Council Member Linda Broussard Vickers
Council Member Mari Nelson
ABSENT: None
STAFF: City Administrator, Jim March
City Attorney, James Hoeft
City Engineer, Tom Peterson
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Wilharber called the August 23, 2000 City Council meeting to order at
6:00 p.m.
II. SET AGENDA
The following items were added to the agenda:
• Ordinance #4 under Unfinished Business
• Correspondence from Lloyd Drilling under Unfinished Business
• City Hall Generator under New Business
Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Nelson
to approve the agenda with noted additions. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
III. PUBLIC HEARING (S)
Ordinance #4
Mr. March stated this was a public hearing to discuss the final changes made to
Ordinance #4 as the recreational vehicle length was being increased to thirty-five
(35) feet and minor language being amended to the whereabouts vehicles could be
parked. He noted recreational vehicles could not be parked in the right -of -way of
any driveway. Mr. March indicated the side setback was being changed to five
(5) feet and ten (10) feet for the rear yard setback.
1
Dawn Sperry, 6913 Tourville Circle, indicated she lives next to a rental home that
is storing full -sized dump trucks in their driveway. She noted the police have
been notified of the noise pollution that these vehicles are creating for the
residents in her cul -de -sac.
Mayor Wilharber noted Ms. Sperry did the correct thing by contacting the police
with this issue and explained that Ordinance #4 would restrict the storage of dump
trucks within residential neighborhoods.
Ray DeVine, Planning and Zoning Commission member, asked if weight
restrictions were going to be set on construction vehicles being stored within
residential areas. Mr. March noted this was not contained in the Ordinance at this
time.
Council Member Nelson asked if satellites could be stored between a park and
residential area. Mr. March noted Ordinance #4 does not address public land at
this time.
Council Member Travis asked how dump trucks were being restricted within a
residential area. Mr. March noted the exact types of vehicles were not spelled
out, but the Ordinance does refer to small construction vehicles. He indicated
letters would be sent to all those in violation with commercial vehicles parked in
their driveway. He asked the City Attorney to comment on this item.
Mr. Hoeft noted that at any time a citation is issued under this Ordinance a six -
person jury within the community would decide the definition if a problem were
to arise.
Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Nelson
to close the public hearing. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
IV. APPEARANCES /AWARDS
Milo Bennett, Centennial Fire Chief — Citv/Fire Hall Generator
Chief Bennett addressed the Council regarding a placement of a generator at City
Hall. He indicated the fire hall is also being proposed for a generator. Chief
Bennett explained the generator would allow the City Hall to function in
emergency situations. He noted he acquired three quotes for the Council to
review and respond to.
Chief Bennett noted the low bid was from Gephart Electric in the amount of
$34,780. He indicated there would be charitable gambling funds available for the
purchase of the generator in the amount of $17,500, which would reduce the
funding needed from the City.
Mayor Wilharber asked if the generator would be run on natural gas and how that
worked. Chief Bennett stated the generator would run on natural gas and is
powered by the pressure within the pipelines. He explained the generator would
start within three (3) to five (5) seconds of the power going down.
2
L
i e
Council Member Nelson indicated she was in favor of the purchase as she felt this
was a good suggestion for the City Hall offices.
Mayor Wilharber asked if any funding was allocated for this item last year. Mr.
March stated funding was not allocated specifically, but stated funds were set
aside for capital improvements and road improvements.
V. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
August 9, 2000 Council Meeting Minutes
Motion by Council Member Nelson, seconded by Council Member Broussard
Vickers to approve the August 9, 2000 Council meeting minutes as amended
on page 4, paragraph 5, to remove "if" from the first sentence, and page 8
paragraph 5 to remove "and increased public liability insurance" from the
first sentence. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
The City of Centerville August 10 through August 23, 2000
Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis
to approve the expenditures for the City from August 10, 2000 through
August 23, 2000. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Centennial Fire District Expenses
Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Nelson
to approve the Centennial Fire District expenditures in the amount of
$16,954.13. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
VII. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS
Keith Okan — Eagle Park Satellite Placement
Council Member Nelson noted she received a complaint that the satellite
placement in Eagle Park was too close to his property line. She indicated he
would like it to be moved to allow him to greater enjoy his lot. Council Member
Nelson explained Mr. Okan would like to see the structure enclosed or bolted
down to assure it would not be tipped over. She indicated she spoke with Karla
DeVine on the Parks and Recreation Commission and noted the item was dropped
at their August meeting.
Council Member Sweeney indicated the location and access of the satellite was
placed at that location for cleaning purposes. He stated the trees in the area also
allow for screening and protection from the unit being tipped. Council Member
Sweeney stated the Parks and Recreation Commission held numerous discussions
about the placement of each unit within the parks. He noted they felt this was the
best placement at the time.
3
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if the unit could be moved ten (10) feet
away from the property line. Mr. Palzer stated the unit is currently three (3) feet
from the property line and could not be on the other side of the trail as it is private
property.
Mayor Wilharber inquired if the unit could be placed near the sidewalk to remain
accessible and placed on a slab. He stated an enclosure could be built at a later
date.
Council Member Broussard Vickers stated she would like to see this cha made
as the accessory structure is closer than five (5) feet to the property line.
Mr. Palzer noted the unit could be moved to the suggested location.
Council Member Travis noted he would not be voting on this issue because he felt
the movement would be opening a can of worms for other property owners near
parks.
Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council
Member Nelson to approve the movement of the satellite in Eagle Park to be
ten (10) feet from the property line as stated within Ordinance #4 for
accessory structures. All in favor. Motion carried. (Sweeney opposed)
(Travis abstained).
VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Nnnter'c Crnccing Tlitrh — Tabled Tilly 76 and August 9. 2000
Mr. Hoeft addressed the Council and stated the Title Company wanted to
exchange some deeds for the northerly plats. He stated the City did receive an
easement for the ditch and the entire waterway was within City property.
Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Nelson
to authorize the City Administrator to execute the quit claim deeds if all land
is within the City easement or City owned property for Hunter's Crossing
Ditch. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Ordinance #4
Council Member Broussard Vickers noted she would like an update on how
grand- fathering worked with items not in compliance with the Ordinance. Mr.
Hoeft stated he would address all future items as they arose. He noted an
amortization could be placed on non - conforming uses to gain compliance over a
number of years if the Council so desired.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked how the dump truck issue would be
handled. Mr. Hoeft indicated a letter would be sent out to the homeowner
requesting compliance and allowing a reasonable amount of time for compliance.
4
Council Member Broussard Vickers noted the Planning and Zoning Commission
did note they were in favor of allowing residents until next summer for the
• housing of recreational vehicles. Mr. Hoeft noted the enforcement of the
Ordinance was up to Council and Staff. He indicated the City would want to be
consistent with the enforcement noting that each lot was unique within the
community. Mr. Hoeft stated the Council would need to keep this in mind when
considering same.
Council Member Travis thanked the Planning and Zoning Commission for their
involvement with Ordinance #4. He noted he had several issues with the
Ordinance but felt there were too many good things within the Ordinance to hold
it up.
Mayor Wilharber concurred with Member Travis.
Motion by Council Member Nelson, seconded by Council Member Broussard
Vickers to approve Ordinance #4 as submitted. All in favor. Motion carried
unanimously.
Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Nelson
to enact the Summary of Ordinance #4 as noted in Resolution 00 -17 for
publication. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
Storm Sewer Alignment
• Mr. Peterson noted the alignment of the storm sewer on the northeast corner of
Main Street and Peterson Trail was proposed to be realigned. He noted the cost
would be roughly $10,134 as sought by Lloyd Drilling. Mr. Peterson indicated
there are issues with the Watershed District and this item may need to be
reviewed by them prior to gaining City approval.
Motion by Mayor Wilharber, seconded by Council Member Nelson to direct
staff to advise Lloyd Drilling to approach the Watershed District on this issue
before obtaining City approval. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
nut cuicSLFiuuucia — ncouiuuuurc a - iu
Mr. March noted Tax Increment Financing (TIF) was allocated to Northern Forest
Products in 1995. He stated when the notes were set up, Ehlers created the cash
flow analysis showing the repayment schedule for this property.
Mr. March noted the landowner was taxed originally at $330,000 versus the
proposed $550,000 which created a shortfall in the TIF available. He noted there
has been a substantial amount of finger pointing with this issue and the former
City Administrator had been discussed.
5
Mr. March noted checks were cut for the developer and landowner for 90% of the
amounts paid. He indicated he is proposing a compromise for all parties
involved.
Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if the pay back would be a percentage •
of the value or a dollar amount. Mr. March indicated the property owners were
under the understanding it would be a dollar amount.
Mr. March explained two (2) payments had been made to Northern Forest
Products. He indicated the City is looking to do a tax abatement for one (1) year
to give Paul McDowell the incentive to expand his current building. Mr. March
stated Mr. McDowell is not in favor of this as it would keep the City running his
business.
Mr. March then stated he would like to see Mr. McDowell expand his building
and approve the tax abatement with no strings attached. He noted the City is
hoping to modify the two (2) notes and go to a closing with Mr. McDowell in
September to allow the owner increased incentives. Mr. March noted that
Northern Forest Products has created jobs and runs a clean operation within the
City. He noted the City is willing to abate up to $25,000 as a maximum based on
the size of the addition constructed on the property.
Council Member Nelson noted she was in favor of the proposal as it would
benefit the City in the long run. She indicated this was a win win situation for all
those involved.
Motion by Council Member Nelson, seconded by Council Member Broussard •
Vickers to approve Resolution 00 -16 regarding the tax abatement for
Northern Forest Products. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously.
2001 Draft Budget
Mr. March indicated that by September 15, 2000 the levy amount would need to
be set by the City. He stated the City's gross tax capacity was roughly
$2,000,000, which was $400,000 higher than the previous year. Mr. March
explained this allows the City greater spending power for future years.
Mr. March noted the City could levy 1,200,000 at the current tax capacity rate
without raising taxes. He indicated he felt this was the consensus of the Council
at this time due to the increase in the tax base.
Mayor Wilharber asked if the levy limits were still in place by legislature. Mr.
March indicated the legislature did eliminate the levy limit increase amounts for
next year.
Mr. March reviewed the assumptions for 2001 as it related to the budget. He
indicated the number of building permits is anticipated to decrease in turn
decreasing revenues. Mr. March noted that police costs would increase for 2001
while the aid to small governments would decrease to $45,000.
6
Mr. March noted there would be several workshop meetings for the Council to
discuss how to address these items along with PublicWorks issues.
• Mayor Wilharber questioned when the property east of Hunter's Crossing would
reach MUSA. Mr. March noted this parcel would reach the MUSA in 2001 but
indicated he was uncertain if this would be developed within the next year.
Mayor Wilharber noted a workshop meeting was set for Wednesday, August 30,
2000 at 6:00 p.m. to discuss the budget in further detail.
Hugo Sewage Spill
Mr. March explained he has been in contact with the MPCA regarding this issue.
He noted the Met Council was going to use the Hugo spill to show the need for
better communication. Mr. March noted adequate testing was completed and
there was no threat to the environment or the health hazards,
Mayor Wilharber asked if the non - recovered sewage was spread into the ground
or ran into the creek. Mr. March noted the majority of the spill was spread into
the field and the fecal count was reduced when exposed to ultra- violet light. He
indicated that the Met Council was not saying whether any portion of the spill was
emitted into the creek.
City Hall Generator
Mayor Wilharber noted that Mr. March indicated there were funds available for
the generator and indicated this would be a great asset for the community.
Council Member Sweeney concurred.
Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Nelson
to approve the purchase of a generator for City Hall as presented by Chief
Bennett. All in favor. Motion carried uanimously.
X. CONSENT AGENDA — None.
XI. COMMITTEE REPORTS
• Mayor Wilharber stated a Police Commission meeting was held and
indicated the budget was discussed. He indicated Circle Pines and
Lexington had not approved their portion of the budget as Centerville had.
Mayor Wilharber noted Circle Pines is going into further discussions on
the budget but Lexington was not willing to budge on the issue. He
inquired if the City of Centerville would be interested in paying an
additional $5,000 to cover expenses. He noted the $5,000 would cover the
increase in the budget as it does not follow the current formula. Mayor
Wilharber indicated he felt the $5,000 was a small portion to cover
additional expenses for the police department to maintain the same level
of coverage. Council Member Sweeney and Council Member Broussard
Vickers concurred provided all officers remain.
7
•
Mr. March stated this was a small amount but noted he was concerned
about the formula created within the Police Commission. He added that a
letter should be sent to Circle Pines and Lexington to urge them to expect
the same level of service from the police department.
•
Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member
Nelson to advise Mr. March to draft letters to Lexington and Circle
Pines regarding the Police Commission budget. All in favor. Motion
carried unanimously.
Mayor Wilharber asked if the Public Works building was being cleaned at
this time. Mr. Palzer noted the completion would be shortly.
Mayor Wilharber questioned if the Council would be interested in
charging the Police Department rent for use of a portion of the Public
Works building. He noted he would not recommend this and Council
concurred.
XII. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
Mr. March indicated there was nothing at this time.
XHI. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Nelson
to adjourn the August 23, 2000 Council Meeting at 8:01 p.m. All in favor.
Motion carried unanimously.
Transcribed by:
Heidi Guenther, Recording Secretary
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
8
Centennial Fire District
• 7741 Lake Drive
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
(651) 784 -7472 - Office
(651) 784 -2427 - Fax
September 6, 2000
TO: City Council
City of Centerville
City Council
City of Circle Pines
City Council
City of Lino Lakes
FROM: Milo Bennett
SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures and approval
for payment of expenses.
Your approval of expenses, as listed on the attached copy of
the check register, checks #12345 — 12369, in the amount of
$5,857.42 is hereby requested.
Centennial Fire District Paget of 1
Check Register
•
DATE CHECK# NAME ACCOUNT AMOUNT
09/06/2000 12345 American Fastener 42110 - Other Maintenance 6.98
09/06/2000 12346 Amaco Oil Company 42100 - Fuel and Lube 436.71
09/06/2000 12347 Anoka - Technical College 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 20.00
09/06/2000 12348 Bill's Rental Center 42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies 61.28
09/06/2000 12349 Circle Pines Utilites 42251 - Station 1 - Gas 27.28
09/06/2000 12350 Cy's Uniforms 42120 - Uniform Expense 108.85
09/06/2000 12351 David Bruder 40100 - Logistical Expense 64.00
09/06/2000 12352 Eddy Brothers Company 42130 - Equipment Expense 823.50
09/06/2000 12353 Emergency Apparatus Maintenance 42000 - Vehicle Maintenance 898.69
09/06/2000 12354 Frattallone's Hardware 42110 - Other Maintenance 198.13
09/06/2000 12355 Frontline Plus Fire & Rescue 42130 - Equipment Expense 1,323.10
09/06/2000 12356 Hugo Feed Mill & Elevator 42110 - Other Maintenance 4.74
09/06/2000 12357 Metro Fire 42130 - Equipment Expense 317.18
09/06/2000 12358 Minnesota State Fire Chiefs Association 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 135.00
09/06/2000 12359 Norm's Tire Sales, Inc. 42000 - Vehicle Maintenance 390.14
09/06/2000 12360 Oxygen Service Company, Inc. 42270 - Breathing Air 113.50
09/06/2000 12361 Pagenet 42240 - Telephone • 148.50
09/06/2000 12362 Paper Direct 42180 - Office Supplies 80.91
09/06/2000 12363 Red Rooster Auto Stores 42110 - Other Maintenance 18.05
09/06/2000 12364 Reliant Energy Minnegasco 42253 - Station 2 - Gas 52.09
09/06/2000 12365 Sedgwick 42110 - Other Maintenance 49.00
09/06 /2000 12366 USI, Inc. 42180 - Office Supplies 64.42
09/06/2000 12367 Verizon Wireless 42240 - Telephone 188.87
09/06/2000 12368 Viking Office Products 42180 - Office Supplies 305.12
09/06/2000 12369 Janet Haapoja 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 21.38
Total $5,857.42
•
September 7, 2000
To: City Council
City of Circle Pines
City Council
City of Centerville
City Council
City of Lino Lakes
From: Milo Bennett
Subject: Ratification of expenditures and approval for payment of September
payroll expense.
Your approval of September payroll expense as listed on the attached copy of the check
register, checks #5053 - 5099, in the amount of $23,862.43, is hereby requested.
mb /nw
cc: 7 Circle Pines City Council
7 Centerville City Council
7 Lino Lakes City Council
2 File
Sep N/, 29014 3.33 Mel urnizr'sn2 FLOG uavinw.
' PAYROLL COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER
CHECK* EMP NUM EMPLOYEE NAME DEPT SOC- SEC -NUM CHECKBOOK /ACCT GROSS PRY DEDUCTIONS NET PRY
5053 1990 ALBERS, JOHN FIR 477 -80- 8643 681.63 111.88 569.75
5 1980 AMRCHER, JEFFREY FIR 468 -80 -7241 510.00 83.40 426.60
1201 BANGERT, RICHARD M FIR 476 -64 -2483 1,509.25 227.00 1,282.25
5056 1203 BARNARD, RICHARD K FIR 473 -72- 9232 294.50 48.27 246.23
5057 1208 BEHR, SCOTT A FIR 469-72-0933 282.63 46.10 236.53
5058 1230 BOGENREIF, KERRY FIR 471-80 -1639 570.00 94.27 475.73
5059 2857 BOLDT, ROBERT FIR 389 -86 -2857 468.75 75.80 392.95
5060 1260 BROKER, MICHAEL A FIR 474 -76 -7059 161.50 26.34 135.16
5061 1265 @RUDER, DAVE FIR 470 - 70-5771 1,175.38 194.04 981.34
5062 1340 CHEVALLIER, THIERRY B FIR 475 -17 -2607 340.00 55.93 284.07
5063 1350 CISEWSKI, JERRY L FIR 472 -64- 5874 635.63 96.00 539.63
5064 1380 COLVARD, BRIAN T FIR 471 -96 -0694 308.13 51.47 256.66
5065 5966 COOPER, DARYL FIR 469 -90 -5966 399.38 65.79 333.59
5066 1390 CRUZ, RAYMOND FIR 563-29-3961 337.25 55.89 2 281.36
5067 1400 DOMITZ, STUART C FIR 469 -84 -2206 399.00 65.79 333.21
5068 1500 ENGLIRJD, DESMOND W FIR 477 -42 -5394 346.88 53.00 293.88
5069 1600 FRENCH, TOM FIR 472- 80-5434 888.25 146.88 741.37
5070 1740 GARDNER, TODD FIR 474-94 -7433 760.00 125.02 634.98
5071 1950 IWAN, CHRISTOPHER E FIR 468 -68 -1189 313.50 71.55 241.95
5072 2140 KERFELD, GLENN FIR 477 -64 -8989 395.63 60.00 335.63
5073 2222 LALLIER, DANIEL FIR 476 -90- 0461 538.13 88.80 449.33
5074 2210 LAUDERBAUGH, RANDY D FIR 474 -80 -1592 1,127.88 170.00 957.88
5075 2250 LEE, STEVE FIR 473 -60 -9468 454.75 68.00 386.75
5076 2340 MENCH, MIKE J FIR 469 -58 -7387 676.88 102.00 574.88
5077 2360 MISCHKE, KATHY FIR 470 -86 -7273 1,256.13 207.21 1,048.52
5078 5555 MISCHKE, SCOTT FIR 472 -17 -5516 631.88 104.16 527.72 i
50" 2365 MISCHKE, THOMAS 6 FIR 474 -80 -2905 1,340.63 220,44 1,120.19
r 2375 MOE, DON FIR 473 -66 -0727 246.50 41.57 204.93
5. 380 MO ER ARTHUR E FIR 473 70� 2821 1 202.25 180.00 1,022.25
you. 2 H .•ua w� , ARTHUR 1,202.25
5082 8029 NADEAU, SCOTT FIR 472 -86 -8029 374.00 61.42 312.58
5083 2440 NORBERG, DEWAYNE C FIR 471 -70 -6197 348.75 58.06 290.69 i
5084 2550 OLSON, GLEN A FIR 476 -64 -5300 996.25 150.00 846.25
5085 2630 PETERSON, JERRY FIR 503-40 -0991 373.13 56.00 317.13
5086 2640 PETERSON, MIKE T FIR 476 -76 -6201 890.38 134.00 756.38
5087 2730 REITER, RONALD FIR 475 -76 -8397 352.75 58.11 294.64
5088 2750 ROBERTSON, GORDON C FIR 470 -68 -3103 316.88 52.59 264.29
5089 2770 ROLSTAD, RANDY T FIR 474 -76 -4827 1,001.88 150.00 851.88
5090 2810 SCOTT, JAMES L FIR 337 -54 -1513 857.38 141.43 715.95
5091 2820 SHIKOWSKY, STEVE FIR 473 -50 -9971 561.00 84.00 477.00
5092 2825 STAFKI, ROBERT FIR 471 -70 -5084 563.13 92.17 470.96
5093 0953 STAHNKE, JUSTIN FIR 471-88 -0953 341.25 55.95 285.30
5094 2830 STARK, MARC FIR 368 -78 -2269 624.63 102.06 522.57
5095 2860 STEWART, KEVIN J FIR 475 -92 -3272 1, 199.56 1,011.44
5096 2880 SWEENEY, TERRANCE H FIR 396 -50- 2400 363.38 59. 304.11
5097 2320 TASCHUK, ALLEN S FIR 470 -78 -1317 249.38 41.62 207.76
5098 2940 THELL, PAUL FIR 470 -80 -9566 238.00 39.45 198.55
5099 2945 THELL, TIM FIR 470 -80- 8515 501.50 82.27 419.23
TOTALS $28,416.99 54,554.56 $23,862.43
PAY SUMMARY
FICA Social Security FICA Medicare
C}EC$I EMP NUM EMPLOYEE NAME DEPT SOC -SEC -NUM CHECKBOOK /ACCT GROSS PRY DEDUCTIONS MET PAY
Federal Tax Withheld Withheld Employer Owed Withheld Employer Owed Advanced EIC Payments Made
42,841.00 4.00 4.00 4264.56 $264.56 4.00
. TOTAL TAX LIABILITY 43,370.12
•
i
Bonestroo. Rosene. Anderlik and Associates. Inc. is an Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunity
Bonestroo Employer and Employee Owned
Y �■ Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo, PE • Marvin L. Sorvalz. P.E. • Glenn R. Cook, PE •
Rosene Robert G. Schunicht RE. • Jerry A Bourdon, P.E.
A nderlik & Senior Consultants: Robert W. Rosene. PE. • Joseph C. Anderlik, PE. • Richard E. Turner, PE •
Susan M. Eberlin. C.RA.
A ssociates Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford. P.E. • Keith A. Gordon. PE. • Robert R. Pfefferle. PC. •
Richard W. Foster. P.C. • David O. Loskota. PE. • Robert C. Russek. A.I.A. • Mark A. Hanson, PE. •
Engineers & Architects Michael T Rautmann. P.C. • Ted K Field, PE • Kenneth P. Anderson, P.E. • Mark R. Rolls. PE.
David A. Bonestroo. M.B.A • Sidney P Williamson, PE., L.S. • Agnes M. Ring, M.B.A. • Allan Rick Schmmdt, P.C.
Offices: St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester and Willmar, MN • Milwaukee. WI
Website: www.banestroo.com
September 7, 2000
Mr. James March
City of Centerville
1880 Main Street
Centerville, VIN 55038
RE: Hunters Crossing •
Centerville, Minnesota
File No. 616 -00 -114
Dear Mr. March:
Enclosed, please find four (4) copies of Pay Request No. 1 for the above referenced project. The
site grading improvements have been completed by North Pine Aggregate. The sanitary sewer
and water main have been installed by Northdale Construction, along Centerville Road and
through out the development. We recommend a partial payment of $1.84,945.15 to Northdale
Construction Company.
Please sign all four copies and return the one stamped "engineer's Copy" to our office. Contact •
me at (65i) 604 -4808 if you have any questions or comments.
•
Sincerely,
BONESTROO, ROSENE,ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES
Daniel S. Schluender
cc: Enclosure
2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 651-636-4600 • Fax: 651 636 - 1311
ENGINEER'S COPY
J /1
Bonestroo Owner: City of Centerville, 1880 Main St, Centerville, MN 55038 Date: September 5, 2000
Rosene
Anderlik & For Period: 7/27/2000 to 9/5/2000 Request No: 1
Associates
Eng inters & Architect Contractor: Northdale Construction Co. Inc., 14450 Northdale Blvd., Rogers, MN 55374
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT
HUNTERS CROSSING
BRA FILE NO. 616 -00 -114
SUMMARY
1 Original Contract Amount $ 502,779.56
2 Change Order - Addition $ 0.00
3 Change Order - Deduction $ 0.00
4 Revised Contract Amount $ _ 502,779.56
5 Value Completed to Date $ 194,679.11
6 Material on Hand $ 0.00
7 Amount Earned $ 194,679.11,
8 Less Retainage 5% $ 9,733.96
9 Subtotal $ _ 184,945.15
10 Less Amount Paid Previously $ 0.00
11 Liquidated damages - $ 0.00
12 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. _ 1 $ 184,945.15
Recommended for Approval by:
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
' /�� ��( Lirfi ;
Approved by •ntractor: Approved by Owner:
• - THDALE ' e NSTRUCTION CO INC CITY OF CENTERVILLE
Specified Contract Completion Date: Date:
cA, fl t2. 2001
aKrZ 21
Request 6t
Contract Unit Quantity Amount
No. Item Unit Quantity Price to Date to Date
Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer - Centerville Road
1 Mobilization LS 1 13500.00 0.5 $6,750.00
2 Traffic control LS 1 2912.00 0.3 $873.60
3 Shouldering aggregate TN 50 24.45 50.00
4 Clear and Grub Tree 2 500.00 2 51,000.00
I 5 Silt fence, regular LF 200 2.00 50.00
6 Remove and replace 36" CMP LS 1 1500.00 1 $1,500.00
7 Salvage and replace gravel driveway , TN 20 17.07 50.00
to existing manhole EA 1 1500.00 1 51,500.00
8 Connect PVC, 9
9 12" PVC, SDR 35, 8 10' deep LF 250 28.09 250 $7,022.50
10 12" PVC, SDR 35, 10 12' deep IF 175 28.09 175 $4,915.75
11 12" PVC, SDR 35, 12'- 14' deep LF 10 28.09 10 5280.90
12 12" PVC, SDR 35, 14' -16' deep LF 265 28.09 265 $7,443.85
13 12" PVC, SDR 26, 16'- 18' deep LF 5 30.54 5 $152.70
14 12" PVC, SDR 26, 18' - 20' deep LF • 15 30.54 15 $458.10
15 4' dia. sanitary manhole EA 1 1394.73 1 $1,394.73
16 Manhole overdepth LF 3 99.97 3 $299.91
17 Adjust MH frame and ring casting EA 1 150.00 50.00
18 Remove bituminous street SY 330 2.00 250 5500.00
19 Patch bituminous street SY 330 15.92 50.00
20 Salvage and reinstall 12" CMP culvert LF 40 16.67 40 $666.80
21 Improved pipe foundation LF 720 0.01 50.00
22 Fiber blanket on steep slopes SY 600 2.08 $0.00
23 Seeding with topsoil and mulch AC 0.75 998.40 $0.00 .
Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer - Centerville Road $34,758.84
Part 2 - Water Main - Centerville Road
24 Connect to existing 12" water main EA 1 750.00 1 $750.00
25 12" PVC, C900 LF 1062 23.86 1062 $25,339.32
26 8" PVC, C900 LF 35 16.71 35 5584.85
27 6" PVC, C900 LF 50 14.24 50 5712.00
28 8" gate valve and box EA 1 652.74 1 5652.74 .
29 12" butterfly valve and box EA 3 851.33 3 $2,553.99
30 Hydrant with gate valve and box EA 3 , 1899.17 3 55,697.51
31 Valve rod extension EA 7 143.49 $0.00 1
32 Fittings LB 3000 1.15 2000 $2,300.00
33 Improved pipe foundation LF 1100 0.01 50.00
34 Sodding SY 700 2.55 50.00
35 12" pipe restraint EA 20 69.64 20 $1,392.80
36 8" pipe restraint EA 4 39.85 4 $159.40
37 Seeding with topsoil and mulch AC 0.25 1018.64 50.00
Total Part 2 - Water Main - Centerville Road 540,142.61
Part 3 - Services - Centerville Road
38 12" x 6" PVC wye EA 2 236.27 2 5472.54
39 12" x 4" PVC wye EA 2 229.88 2 $459.76
40 4" PVC, Schedule 40 service pipe LF 40 11.22 $0.00
41 6" HDPE sewer service directional drill LF 156 42.02 50.00
42 4" PVC, Schedule 40 riser pipe LF 10 17.47 10 5174.70
43 1" copper water service LF 90 8.59 50.00
44 1" copper service directional drill LF 400 9.39 50.00
45 Reconnect water service EA 1 178.76 $0.00
46 Connect to existing sewer service EA 1 178.76 50.00
47 1" curb stop and box EA 6 132.51 50.00
48 1" corporation stop EA 7 143.16 50.00
Total Part 3 - Services - Centerville Road $1,107.00
Part 4 - Sanitary Sewer - Hunters Crossing
49 8" PVC, SDR 35, 18'- 20' deep - jacked LF 60 246.99 60 $14,819.40
50 8" PVC, SDR 35, 8'- 10' deep LF 350 16.25 350 $5,687.50
51 8" PVC, SDR 35, 10'- 12' deep LF 900 18.37 900 $16,533.00
52 8" PVC, SDR 35, 12'- 14' deep LF 300 18.37 300 55,511.00
53 8" PVC, SDR 35, 14'- 16' deep LF 500 20.14 493 59,929.02
54 4' diameter sanitary manhole EA 9 1362,87 10 $13,628.70
55 Manhole overdepth LF 56 99.97 50 $4,998.50
Request as
Contract Unit Quantity Amount
No. Item Unit Quantity Price to Date to Date
56 Improved pipe foundation LF 2000 0.01 $0.00
Total Part 4 - Sanitary Sewer - Hunters Crossing 571,107.12
Part 5 - Water Main - Hunters Crossing
57 8" PVC, C900 - jacked LF 45 143.24 45 $6,445.80
58 8" PVC, C900 LF 1330 14.05 1310 $18,405.50
59 6" PVC, C900 LF 810 11.58 481 $5,569.98
' 60 6" gate valve and box EA 2 490.86 2 $981.72
61 8" gate valve and box EA 4 652.74 4 $2,610.96
62 Hydrant with gate valve and box EA 6 1899.17 3 $5,697.51
63 Valve rod extension EA 12 98.49 $0,00
64 Gate valve wrench, 8' long EA 1 39.08 $0.00
65 Gate valve wrench, 3' long EA 2 23.11 50.00
66 Hydrant wrench EA • 3 29.50 $0.00
67 Fittings LB 3000 1.30 2000 $2,600.00
68 Improved pipe foundation LF 1000 0.01 $0.00
69 8" pipe restraint EA 24 39.82 18 $716.76
70 6" pipe restraint EA 16 30.24 10 $302.40
71 Insulation, 2" thick SY 20 17.46 50.00
Total Part 5 - Water Main - Hunters Crossing $43,330.63
Part 6 - Services - Hunters Crossing
72 8" x 4" PVC wye EA 37 76.63 37 $2,835.31
73 4" PVC sewer service LF 1710 6.64 $0.00
74 4" PVC riser pipe LF 90 17.47 80 51,397.60
75 1" copper water service LF 1730 5.76 $0.00
76 1" curb stop and box EA 37 107.51 $0.00
77 1 " corporation stop EA 37 67.05 $0.00
78 Curb box wrench EA 3 34.82 $0.00
Total Part 6 - Services - Hunters Crossing 54,232.91
Part 7 - Storm Sewer - Hunters Crossing
79 12" HOPE LF 330 17.51 50.00
80 12" RCP, Class 5 LF 120 20.77 $0.00
81 15" RCP, Class 5 LF 80 . 22.14 $0.00
82 18" HDPE LF 215 22.91 $0.00
83 18" RCP, Class 5 LF 210 24.16 $0.00
84 Improved pipe foundation LF 500 0.01 $0.00
85 Catch basin EA 4 942.19 $0.00
86 Catch basin manhole EA 4 1371.39 $0.00
87 Pond outlet structure EA 1 1898.07 $0.00
88 12" RCP apron w /trash guard EA 1 534.52 $0.00
89 12" HDPE apron w /trash guard EA 1 254.43 $0.00
90 18" RCP apron w /trash guard EA 1 649.81 $0.00
91 18" HDPE apron w /trash guard EA 2 306.63 $0.00
92 Rock riprap, Class 3 CY 25 65.00 $0.00
93 Sodding SY 500 2.55 $0.00
Total Part 7 - Storm Sewer - Hunters Crossing $0.00
Part 8 - Street - Hunters Crossing
94 Mill bituminous strip • LF 100 3.12 $0.00
95 Subgrade preparation RD STA 24 125.00 $0.00
96 Granular borrow (CV) CY 5000 9.71 50.00
97 Aggregate base, Class 5 - streets TN 3300 9.30 50.00
98 Aggregate base, Class 5 - trail TN 700 9.82 50.00
99 Type 31B bituminous base course TN 700 27.51 $0.00
100 Type 41 B bituminous wear course - streets TN 700 29.64 50.00
101 Type 41A bituminous wear - trail TN 185 38.48 $0.00
102 Bituminous material for tack coat GAL 400 1.30 $0.00
103 Surmountable concrete curb and gutter LF 4400 6.66 $0.00
104 Barricade EA 2 234.00 $0.00
105 4" draintile LF 4260 3.42 50.00
106 Geotextile fabric SY 9000 1.35 50.00
107 Seeding with topsoil and mulch AC 1.5 998.40 $0.00
Total Part 8 - Street - Hunters Crossing $0.00
Request et
Contract Unit Quantity Amount
No. item Unit Quantity Price to Date to Date
Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer - Centerville Road $34,758.84
Total Part 2 - Water Main - Centerville Road $40,142.61
Total Part 3 - Services - Centerville Road $1,107,00
Total Part 4 - Sanitary Sewer - Hunters Crossing $71,107.12
Total Part 5 - Water Main - Hunters Crossing $43,330.63
Total Part 6 - Services - Hunters Crossing $4.232.91
Total Part 7 - Storm Sewer - Hunters Crossing $0.00
Total Part 8 - Street - Hunters Crossing $0.00
Total Work Completed To Date $194,679.11
Request ki
PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS
OWNER CITY OF CENTERVILLE
BRA FILE NO. 616-00-114
CONTRACTOR NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO INC
CHANGE ORDERS
No. Date Description Amount
Total Change Orders
PAYMENT SUMMARY
No. From To Payment Retainage Completed
1 1 07/27/2000 1 09/05/00 1 184,945.15 I 9,733.96 I 194,679.11
Material on Hand
Total Payment to Date $184,945.15 Original Contract $502,779.56
Retainage Pay No. 1 9,733.96 Chanqe Orders
Total Amount Earned $194,679.11 Revised Contract $502,779.56
Request M1
MEMO
DATE : September 8, 2000
TO : Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM: Jim March
RE : Resolution #00 -17, Resolution #00 -20 (Hunter's Crossing)
Included in your packet is Resolution #00 -17. This resolution calls for the issuance and
sale of $650,000 in general obligation improvement bonds of 2000. This item was
previously adopted, but is being adopted again to reflect the revised bond opening date.
Also included in your packet is Resolution #00 -20. This resolution authorizes an
assessment hearing to be held on September 27 At that meeting, Council will formally
adopt the assessment role for Hunter's Crossing.
' ?+
tiz
,4
t ervitCe 1880 Main Street • Centerville, MN 55038
Established 1857 (651) 429 - 3232 • F(12(16511429
Extract of Minutes of Meeting
of the City Council of the City
of Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota, was held at the City Hall in the City on Wednesday,
September 13, 2000, commencing at 6:00 o'clock P.M.
The following members of the Council were present:
and the following were absent:
* ** * ** * **
The following resolution WAS nrecented by Cnuncilmember . who moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION #00 -17
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF
$650,000 GENERAI., OBLIGATION
IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 2000
BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Centerville, Anoka County,
Minnesota (City) as follows:
1. It is hereby determined that:
(a) the following assessable public improvements (the Improvements) have
been made, duly ordered or contracts let for the construction thereof, by the City pursuant
to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 (Act);
Project Designation & Description: Total Project Cost
Hunters Crossing Improvements
Construction Costs $502,780.00
Contingencies and Engineering 120,667.20
Subtotal $623,447.20
Costs of Issuance 23,929.38
Less: Est. Const. Fund Inv. Income (1,108.35)
Subtotal $649,568.23
Rounding Factor 431.78
Total Issue $650,000.00
(b) it is necessary and expedient to the sound financial management of the
affairs of the City to issue $650,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 2000
(Bonds) pursuant to the Act to provide financing for the Improvements.
2. To provide financing for the Improvements, the City will issue and sell Bonds in
the amount of $640,250. To provide in part the additional interest required to market the Bonds
at this tune, additional Bonus will be issued in the amount of $9,750. The excess of the purchase
price of the Bonds over the sum of $640,250 will be credited to the debt service fund for the
Bonds for the purpose of paying interest first coming due on the additional Bonds. The Bonds
will be issued, sold and delivered in accordance with the terms of the following Terms of
Proposal:
TERMS OF PROPOSAL
$650,000
General Obligation Improvement
Bonds of 2000
City of Centerville
Anoka County, Minnesota
(BOOK ENTRY ONLY)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN sealed proposals for the purchase of the above bonds will
be received until 11:00 o'clock A.M., C.T. on Wednesday, October 25, 2000, in the offices of
Juran & Moody, a Division of Miller, Johnson & Kuehn, Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota, at which time
the proposals will be opened and tabulated for consideration by the City Council at a meeting at
6:00 o'clock P.M. on the same day. The bonds are offered on the following terms.
Purpose and Security
The purpose of the bonds is to provide funds for the financing of assessable public
improvements in the City. The bonds will be general obligations of the City, for which its full
faith, credit and taxing powers are pledged together with special assessments against benefited
properties.
Details of the Bonds
The bonds will be issued in fully registered form, will be dated November 1, 2000, will
be in denominations of integral multiples of $5,000 each and will mature on February 1, in the
years and amounts as follows:
Year Amount Year Amount
2002 $175,000 2007 $10,000
2003 175,000 2008 15,000
2004 200,000 2009 15,000
2005 10,000 2010 20,000
2006 10,000 2011 20,000
Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for any combination of serial
bonds and term bonds, subject to mandatory redemption, so long as the amounts of principal
maturing or subject to mandatory redemption in each year conforms to the maturity schedule set
forth above.
Book Entry System
The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution
of Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond,
representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be
registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC "),
New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual
purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof
of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its
participants. Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as
registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of
DTC will be the responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial
owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of
beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to
deposit the Bonds with DTC.
Optional Redemption
The City may elect on February 1, 2006, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds.
Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option of the City and in such manner
as the City will determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City
will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by
lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant
will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed.
Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest.
Mandatory Redemption
Any term bonds issued will be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption in part prior
to their scheduled maturity dates on February 1 of certain years, as more fully described in the
Details of the Bonds section herein, at a price of par plus accrued interest to the date of
L •
i c ucuip Lion.
T,.r,...... -r
Interest on the bonds will be payable on February 1, 2001, and semiannually thereafter on
each February 1 and August 1. Bonds maturing on the same date must bear interest from date of
issue until paid at a single, uniform rate, not exceeding the rate specified for bonds of any
subsequent maturity. Each rate must be in an integral multiple of 1/20 or 1/8 of 1 %. Interest
will be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months.
Registrar
The City will name the Registrar which will be subject to applicable SEC regulations.
Principal will be payable at the principal office of the Registrar and interest will be payable by
check or draft of the Registrar mailed to the registered holder of a bond. The City will pay the
reasonable and customary charges for the services of the Registrar.
CUSIP Numbers
The City assumes no obligation for the assignment or printing of CUSIP numbers on the
bonds or for the correctness of any numbers printed thereon, but will permit such numbers to be
assigned and printed at the expense of the purchaser, if the purchaser waives any extension of the
time of delivery caused thereby.
Award
The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a
true interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in
accordance with customary practice, will be controlling.
The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non - substantive informalities of any proposal
or of matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals
without cause, and, (iii) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply
with the terms herein.
Delivery
Within 40 days after sale, the City will furnish and deliver to the office of the purchaser
or, at its option, will deposit with a bank in the United States selected by it and approved by the
City as its agent to permit examination by and to deliver to the purchaser, the printed and
executed bonds, the unqualified opinion thereon of bond counsel, and a certificate stating that no
litigation in any manner questioning their validity is then threatened or pending. The charge of
the delivery agent must be paid by the purchaser but all other costs will be paid by the City. The
purchase price must be paid upon delivery of the bonds in funds available for expenditure by the
City on the day of payment.
Legal Opinion
An unqualified legal opinion on the bonds will be furnished by Kennedy & Graven,
Chartered, Minneapolis, Minnesota. The legal opinion will be printed on the bonds at the request
of the purchaser. The legal opinion will state that the bonds are valid and binding general
obligations of the City payable primarily from special assessments against benefited properties
and that the City is required by law to levy taxes for the principal and interest thereon as the
same become due without limit as to rate or amount.
Bond Insurance at Purchaser's Option
If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or
commitment therefor at the option of the bidder, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the
issuance of any such commitment will be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of the
Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of insurance
will be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a rating on the
Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay the rating fee. Any other rating agency fees will
be the responsibility of the purchaser.
Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the
purchaser will not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on
the Bonds.
Official Statement
The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent
information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly -final Official
Statement as required by Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the
interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other information required by law, will constitute a
Final Official Statement of the City with respect to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule
15c2 -12. By awarding the Bonds to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting an
official Proposal Form therefor, the City agrees that, no more than seven business days after the
date of such award, it will provide without cost to the senior managing underwriter of the
syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 25 copies of the Official Statement and the addenda
described above. The City designates the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which
the Bonds are awarded as its agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official
Statement to each Participating Underwriter. Any underwriter executing and delivering an
Official Proposal Form with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its proposal is accepted
by the City (i) it will accept such designation and (ii) it will enter into a contractual relationship
with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring the receipt by each
such Participating Mulct writer of the Final Official Statement.
Continuing Disclosure
Participating underwriters need not comply with the continuing disclosure requirements
of Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Rule "), because the offering is in a principal amount less than
. P u i wiiayu_u%iy, the C j gill not onto unto, and undertaking to provide continuing,
disclosure of any kind with respect to the Bonds.
Type of Proposal - Amount
A sealed proposal will be for not less than $640,250 and accrued interest on the total
principal amount of the Bonds. Proposals will be accompanied by a good Faith Deposit
( "Deposit ") in the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount
of $13,000, payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany each
proposal. If a Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to
issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be
submitted to Juran & Moody, a Division of Miller, Johnson & Kuehn, Inc., prior to the opening
of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is
guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a
Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is required to submit its Deposit to Juran & Moody, a
Division of Miller, Johnson & Kuehn, Inc., in the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire
transfer as instructed by Juran & Moody, a Division of Miller, Johnson & Kuehn, Inc., not later
than 3:30 P.M., Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is
not received by that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the
Deposit requirement. The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will
be deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser
fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No
proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the
meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to
another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates will be in integral multiples
of 5 /100 or 1/8 of 1 %. Bonds of the same maturity will bear a single rate from the date of the
Bonds to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be accepted.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ Jim March
City Administrator
Dated: September 13, 2000.
3. Juran & Moody, a Division of Miller, Johnson & Kuehn, Inc. is authorized and
directed to negotiate the Bonds in accordance with the foregoing Terms of Proposal. The City
Council will meet at 6:00 o'clock P.M. on Wednesday, October 25, 2000, to consider proposals
on the Bonds and take any other appropriate action with respect to the Bonds.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember , and upon vote being taken thereon the following members
voted in favor of the motion:
and the following voted against:
whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
)
CITY OF CENTERVILLE )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Administrator of the City of
Centerville, Minnesota, hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing
extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held on Wednesday,
September 13, 2000, with the original minutes on file in my office and the extract is a full, true
and correct copy of the minutes, insofar as they relate to the issuance and sale of $650,000
General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 2000 of the City.
WITNESS My hand as City Administrator and the corporate seal of the City this
day of , 2000.
City Administrator
City of Centerville, Minnesota
(SEAL)
zi •
r r;
r A,..
e tervitte
1880 Main Street • Centerui!!e, MN 55038
Established 1857 EXHIBIT d (651) 429 -3232 • Fax (651) 429 -8629
Extract of Minutes of Meeting
of the City Council of the City
of Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota, was held at the City Hall in the City
on Wednesday, September 13, 2000, commencing at 6:00 o'clock P.M.
The following members of the Council were present:
and the following were absent:
The following resolution was presented by Councilmember , who
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION #00 -20
RESOLUTION CALLING HEARING ON ASSESSMENTS FOR THE HUNTER'S
CROSSING STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS OF 2000
WHEREAS, The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City consulting engineer, has
prepared an assessment roll for the Hunter's Crossing improvements, and said proposed
assessment roll is on file with the City Clerk and open to public inspection;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Centerville, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Clerk shall publish notice that this Council will meet to consider the
proposed assessments on September 13, 2000, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers of said City of Centerville, Minnesota. The published notice
shall be in substantially the form set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto.
4 4
2. A copy of the notice in substantially the form set forth in Exhibit B
attached hereto shall be mailed to the owners of each parcel of property
described in the assessment roll.
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this 13 day of
September, 2000.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Jim March, City Administrator
t au e to (J Lf e 1880 Main Street • Centerville, MN 55038
Established jg f (651) 429 -3232 • Fax (651) 429.8629
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET
IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENTS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville,
Minnesota will meet on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall,
1880 Main Street, in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to
consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed assessment for the utility and street
improvements within the plat known as Hunter's Crossing and along a portion of
Centerville Road. Adoption by the council of the proposed assessment may occur at the
hearing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed:
Hooters Cro Plat
PID # ADDRESS
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0021 6953 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0005 6945 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0004 6939 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0002 & R23- 31 -22 -32 -0019 6907 LaMotte Drive (Laurie LaMotte Park)
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0018 6925 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0013 6903 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22- 43.000! Country Ridge
R23- 31 -22 -34 -0002 6892 Centerville Road
R26- 31 -22 -12 -0005 6756 Centerville Road (Hunter's Crossinel
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's Office.
The improvement project was considered at a hearing on May 10, 2000. The total
estimated project cost is $650,000. The total amount of the proposed assessment is
$622,495 of which $571,053.10 is proposed to be assessed against the Hunter's Crossing
Plat and $52,441.90 is proposed to be assessed against the other parcels. Written or oral
objections will be considered at the meeting.
No appeal may be taken as to the amount of the assessment unless a signed, written
objection signed by the property owner is filed with the Clerk prior to the hearing or
I
presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may upon such notice
consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned
meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable.
An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of
Centerville within thirty (30) days after the adoption of the assessment and filings such
notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or City
Clerk.
The City Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assisted devices or a sign
language interpreter must be received before 4:00 p.m. September 22, 2000. All persons
interested are invited to attend and to be heard, orally or in writing. You may call City
Hall (651) 429 -3232 if you have any questions.
September 7, 2000
/s/ Teresa Bender, Clerk/Treasurer
abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz
Published in the Quad Community Press September 12, 2000 and September 19, 2000
`- e tervilte
1880 Main Street • Centerville, MN 55038
Established 1857 (651) 429-3232 • Fax (651) 429 -8629
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT
ASSESSMENTS
Mr. & Mrs. Robert Barett
6953 Centerville Road
Centerville, MN 55038
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota will meet
on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street, in the Council
Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider. and possibly adopt. the proposed
assessment for the utility and street improvements within the plat known as Hunter's Crossing and along
a portion of Centerville Road. Adoption by the council of the proposed assessment may occur at the
hearing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed:
HUNTER'S CROSSING PLAT
P111 v /ILL sS.L ,nJ
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0021 6953 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0005 6945 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0004 6939 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0002 & R23- 31 -22 -32 -0019 6907 LaMotte Drive (Laurie
LaMotte Park)
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0018 6925 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0013 6903 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -43 -0001 Country Ridge
R23- 31 -22 -34 -0002 6892 Centerville Road
R26- 31 -22 -12 -0005 6756 Centerville Road
(Hunter's Crossing)
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is $0. Such
assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years.
the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday of January 2001 and will bear
interest at the rate of eight percent (8 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment
resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the
assessment resolution under December 31, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due shall be
added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire
assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk/Treasurer.
No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk/Treasurer the entire amount of the
assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment
is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through
December 31 of' the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given
above the rate of interest that will apply is eight percent (8 %) per year.
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount
of the proposed assessment is $622,495. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting.
No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed
with the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may
upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an
adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable.
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be as
follows:
1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by
narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each
witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This
procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further
questions.
2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or
present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure fur
questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's
witnesses.
3. The objector may be represented by counsel.
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be
considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or
testimony presented to the council.
5. The entire proceedings will be tape- recorded (video- taped).
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final
presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence
may be presented at this point.
7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing.
An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by
serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within thirty (30) after the adoption of
the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the
Mayor or Clerk.
V < -4 .e L im, .
City Clerk
gen y/ /� y � )q
eI l/ lut 1880 Main Street • Centerville, MN 55038
Established 1857 (651) 429 -3232 • Fax (651) 429 -8629
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT
ASSESSMENTS
Mr. & Mrs. Bernard Henrich
6945 Centerville Road
Centerville, MN 55038
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota will meet
on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street, in the Council
Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider. and possibly adopt. the proposed
assessment for the utility and street imp o�ements within the plat known as I luntcr's Crossing and along
a portion of Centerville Road. Adoption by the council of the proposed assessment may occur at the
healing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed:
TSf TKTTro'c co necTAT(; PT AT
PID # ADDRESS
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0021 6953 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -37 -0005 6945 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0004 6939 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0002 & R23- 31 -22 -32 -0019 6907 LaMotte Drive (Laurie
LaMotte Park)
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0018 6925 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0013 6903 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -43 -0001 Country Ridge
R23- 31 -22 -34 -0002 6892 Centerville Road
R26- 31 -22 -12 -0005 6756 Centerville Road
(Hunter's Crossing)
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is $2,640.60.
Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10
years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday of January 2001 and will
bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment
resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the
assessment resolution under December 31, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due shall be
added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire
• assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk/Treasurer.
No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk/Treasurer the entire amount of the
assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment
is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through
December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given
above the rate of interest that will apply is eight percent (8 %) per year.
s _ .. _ _. _ �� r. r _ .+, r _ t -.. the City Clerk's office. Ce. The total amount
1LL plUpoJeLL u�o..,o.....L.. .o fill r 1V- Y u .a u.� at aC e..}
of the proposed assessment is $622,495. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting.
No appeal may he taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed. written objection is filed
with the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may
upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an
adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable.
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be as
follows:
1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by
narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each
witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This
procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further
questions.
2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or
r . .... , ,.. . Y. .. ..
questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's
witnesses.
3. The objector may be represented by counsel.
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be
considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or
testimony presented to the council.
5. The entire proceedings will be tape - recorded (video taped).
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final
presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence
may be presented at this point.
7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing.
An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by
serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within thirty (30) after the adoption of
the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the
Mayor or Clerk.
D
City Clerk
,
e to vitte 1880 Main Street • Centerville, 141`x/ 55038
`Fsta6�1Shed (651) 429 -;232 • Fat (651) 429-8629
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT
ASSESSMENTS
Mr. & Mrs. Dale Greenwaldt
6937 Centerville Road
Centerville, MN 55038
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota will meet
on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall. 1880 Main Street, in the Council
Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed
assessment for the utility and street improvements within the plat known as Hunter's Crossing and along
a portion of Centerville Road. Adoption by the council of the proposed assessment may occur at the
hearing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed:
HUNTER'S CROSSING PLAT
PID # ADDRESS
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0021 6953 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0005 6945 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0004 6939 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0002 & R23- 31 -22 -32 -0019 6907 LaMotte Drive (Laurie
LaMotte Park)
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0018 6925 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0013 6903 Centerville Road
R23-31-22-.13-0001 Country Ridge
R23- 31 -22 -34 -0002 6892 Centerville Road
R26- 31 -22 -12 -0005 6756 Centerville Road
(Hunter's Crossing)
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is $2,640.60.
Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10
years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday of January 2001 and will
bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment
resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the
assessment resolution under December 31, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due shall be
added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire
assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk/Treasurer.
No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk/Treasurer the entire amount of the
assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment
is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through
December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given
above the rate of interest that will apply is eight percent (8 %) per year.
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount
of the proposed assessment is $622,495. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting.
No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed
with the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may
upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an
adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable.
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be as
follows:
1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by
narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each
witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This
.. „ , _. .._.___...a _:.,_ ,...,,- --'....__ .....:. ....:.7. side h A,. -thc.
p1 V40UUL1. Yr 111 UL. 1b rr..ri .u�u fl Jt11 Uu 11u side has a... ...�.
questions.
2 Ater t h e City has presenter' all its e the objector _ TIeCe m 2v call Witnesses or
present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for
questioning of the City's witnesses will he followed with the objector's
witnesses.
3. The objector may be represented by counsel.
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be
considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or
testimony presented to the council.
5. The entire proceedings will be tape- recorded (video- taped).
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final
presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence
may be presented at this point.
7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing.
An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by
serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within thirty (30) after the adoption of
the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the
Mayor or Clerk.
City Clerk
t {rV e/ V iffe 1880 Main Street • Centerville, 51f [ 55038
Ectadluked 1857 (651) 429 -3232 • 'faa (651) 429 -8627
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT
ASSESSMENTS
City of Centerville
6907 LaMotte Drive
(Laurie LaMotte Park)
Centerville, MN 55038
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota will meet
on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street, in the Council
Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed
assessment for the utility and street improvements within the plat known as Hunter's Crossing and along
a portion of Centerville Road. Adoption by the council of the proposed assessment may occur at the
hearing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed:
HUNTER'S CROSSING PLAT
nt u AnnnVCC
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0021 6953 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0005 6945 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0004 6939 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0002 & R23- 31 -22 -32 -0019 6907 1.aMotte Drive (Laurie
LaMotte Park)
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0018 6925 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0013 6903 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -43 -0001 Country Ridge
R23- 31 -22 -34 -0002 6892 Centerville Road
R26- 31 -22 -12 -0005 6756 Centerville Road
(Hunter's Crossing)
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is $3,074. Such
assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years,
the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday of January 2001 and will bear
interest at the rate of eight percent (8 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment
resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the
assessment resolution under December 31, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due shall be
added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
•
You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire
assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk/Treasurer.
No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk/Treasurer the entire amount of the
assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment
is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through
December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given
above the rate of interest that will apply is eight percent (8 %) per year.
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount
of the proposed assessment is $622,495. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting.
No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed
with the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may
upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an
adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable.
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be as
follows:
1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by
narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each
witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This
procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further
questions.
2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or
present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for
questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be
considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or
testimony presented to the council.
5. The entire proceedings will be tape- recorded (video- taped).
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final
presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence
may be presented at this point.
7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing.
An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by
serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within thirty (30) after the adoption of
the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the
Mayor or Clerk.
C e -eld
City Clerk
' e tervitte
1880 Main Street • CentervilCe, MN 55035
Established 1857 (651) 429 -3232 • Fax(651)429-8629
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT
ASSESSMENTS
Mr. & Mrs. Larry Woiak
6925 Centerville Road
Centerville, MN 55038
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota will meet
on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street, in the Council
Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed
assessment for the utility and street improvements within the plat known as Hunter's Crossing and along
a portion of Centerville Road. Adoption by the council of the proposed assessment may occur at the
h The f i the area nrnnn to b a CCPvved•
HUNTER'S CROSSING PLAT
PID # ADDRESS
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0021 6953 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0005 6945 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0004 6939 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0002 & R23- 31 -22 -32 -0019 6907 LaMotte Drive (Laurie
LaMotte Park)
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0018 6925 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0013 6903 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -43 -0001 Country Ridge
R23- 31 -22 -34 -0002 6892 Centerville Road
R26- 31 -22 -12 -0005 6756 Centerville Road
(Hunter's Crossing)
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is $7,382.70.
Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10
years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday of January 2001 and will
bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment
resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the
assessment resolution under December 31, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due shall be
added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
• You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire
assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk/Treasurer.
No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk/Treasurer the entire amount of the
assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment
is made. Such 3'm
Fa ent must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through
December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given
above the rate of interest that will apply is eight percent (8 %) per year.
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount
of the proposed assessment is $622,495. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting.
No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed
with the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may
upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an
adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable.
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be as
follows:
1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by
narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each
witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This
procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further
questions.
2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or
present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for
questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's
witnesses.
3. The objector may be represented by counsel.
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be
considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or
testimony presented to the council.
5. The entire proceedings will be tape- recorded (video- taped).
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final
presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence
may be presented at this point.
7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing.
An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by
serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within thirty (30) after the adoption of
the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the
Mayor or Clerk.
City Clerk
r Y
(�/ f to lI itte 1880 Main Street • Centerville, MN 55038
Established 1857 (651)429-3232 • jai, (651) 429.8629
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT
ASSESSMENTS
Mr. & Mrs. Charles Baumann
6903 Centerville Road
Centerville, MN 55038
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota will meet
on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street, in the Council
Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed
assessment for the utility and street improvements within the plat known as Hunter's Crossing and along
a portion of Centerville Road. Adoption by the council of the proposed assessment may occur at the
hearing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed:
HUNTER'S CROSSING PLAT
PID # ADDRESS
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0021 6953 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0005 6945 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0004 6939 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0002 & R23- 31 -22 -32 -0019 6907 LaMotte Drive (Laurie
1.aMotte Park)
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0018 6925 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0013 6903 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -43 -0001 Country Ridge
R23- 31 -22 -34 -0002 6892 Centerville Road
R26- 31 -22 -12 -0005 6756 Centerville Road
(Hunter's Crossing)
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is $16,708.40.
Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10
years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday of January 2001 and will
bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment
resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the
assessment resolution under December 31, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due shall be
added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire
assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk/Treasurer.
No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk/Treasurer the entire amount of the
assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment
is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through
December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given
above the rate of interest that will apply is eight percent (8 %) per year.
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount
of the proposed assessment is $622,495. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting.
No appeal may be taken as to the amount of' an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed
with the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may
upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an
adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable.
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be as
follows:
1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by
narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each
witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This
procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further
questions.
2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or
present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for
questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's
witnesses.
3. The objector may be represented by counsel.
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be
considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or
testimony presented to the council.
5. The entire proceedings will be tape- recorded (video- taped).
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final
presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence
may be presented at this point.
7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing.
An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by
serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within thirty (30) after the adoption of
the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after'service upon the
Mayor or Clerk.
,
City Clerk
' t enitervide 1880 Main Street • Centrrviffe, MN 55038
`Established 1857 (651)429 -3232 •Fa.x(651)429•8629
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT
ASSESSMENTS
Gor -Em Development
10738 Hanson Boulevard
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota will meet
on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street, in the Council
Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed
assessment for the utility and street improvements within the plat known as Hunter's Crossing and along
a portion of Centerville Road. Adoption by the council of the proposed assessment may occur at the
hearing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed:
HUNTER'S CROSSING PLAT
PID # ADDRESS
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0021 6953 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0005 6945 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0004 6939 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0002 & R23- 31 -22 -32 -0019 6907 LaMotte Drive (Laurie
LaMotte Park)
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0018 6925 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0013 6903 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -43 -0001 Country Ridge
R23- 31 -22 -34 -0002 6892 Centerville Road
R26- 31 -22 -12 -0005 6756 Centerville Road
(Hunter's Crossing)
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is $2,561.60.
Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10
years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday of January 2001 and will
bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment
resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the
assessment resolution under December 31, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due shall be
added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
• ( •
You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire
assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk/Treasurer.
No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk/Treasurer the entire amount of the
assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment
is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through
December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given
above the rate of interest that will apply is eight percent (8 %) per year.
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount
of the proposed assessment is $622,495. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting.
No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed
with the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may
upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an
adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable.
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be as
follows:
1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by
narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each
witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This
procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further
questions.
2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or
present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for
questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's
witnesses.
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be
considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or
testimony presented to the council.
5. The entire proceedings will be tape- recorded (video- taped).
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final
presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence
may be presented at this point.
7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing.
An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by
serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within thirty (30) after the adoption of
the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the
Mayor or Clerk.
City Clerk
c 4 a.
tie L
e t e V iff e 1880 Main Street • Centerville, MN 55038
Established 1857 (651) 429 -3232 • fa A (651) 429 -8629
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT
ASSESSMENTS
Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Vanderbeek
6892 Centerville Road
Centerville, MN 55038
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota will meet
on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street, in the Council
Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed
assessment for the utility and street improvements within the plat known as Hunter's Crossing and along
a portion of Centerville Road. Adoption by the council of the proposed assessment may occur at the
hearing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed:
HUNTER'S CROSSING PLAT
Pill # ADDRESS
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0021 6953 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0005 6945 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0004 6939 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0002 & R23- 31 -22 -32 -0019 6907 LaMotte Drive (Laurie
LaMotte Park)
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0018 6925 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0013 6903 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -43 -0001 Country Ridge
R23- 31 -22 -34 -0002 6892 Centerville Road
R26- 31 -22 -12 -0005 6756 Centerville Road
(Hunter's Crossing)
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is $16,434. Such
assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years,
the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday of January 2001 and will bear
interest at the rate of eight percent (8 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment
resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the
assessment resolution under December 31, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due shall be
added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire
assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk/Treasurer.
• No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk/Treasurer the entire amount of the
assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment
is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through
December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given
above the rate of interest that will apply is eight percent (8 %) per year.
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount
of the proposed assessment is $622,495. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting.
No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed
with the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may
upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an
adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable.
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be as
follows:
1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by
narrative or by examination. and by the introduction of exhibits. After each
witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This
procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further
questions.
2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or
present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for
questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's
witnesses.
3. The objector may be represented by counsel.
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be
considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or
testimony presented to the council.
5. The entire proceedings will be tape- recorded (video - taped).
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final
presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence
may be presented at this point.
7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing.
An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by
serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within thirty (30) after the adoption of
the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the
Mayor or Clerk.
C _ YLCt.4Qi -ea TX(
_
City Clerk
4
1880 Main Street • Centerville, SLf9J 55038
Established 1857 (651) 429 -3232 • 'fax (651) 429-8629
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT
ASSESSMENTS
Mr. Rick Carlson
7671 Central Avenue Northeast
Fridley, MN 55432
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Centerville. Minnesota will meet
on Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street, in the Council
Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed
assessment for the utility and street improvements within the plat known as Hunter's Crossing and along
a portion of Centerville Road. Adoption by the council of the proposed assessment may occur at the
hearing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed:
HUNTER'S CROSSING PLAT
PID # ADDRESS
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0021 6953 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0005 6945 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0004 6939 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0002 & R23- 31 -22 -32 -0019 6907 LaMotte Drive (Laurie
Larviu:ic rusk)
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0018 6925 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -32 -0013 6903 Centerville Road
R23- 31 -22 -43 -0001 Country Ridge
R23- 31 -22 -34 -0002 6892 Centerville Road
R26- 31 -22 -12 -0005 6756 Centerville Road
(Hunter's Crossing)
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is $571,053.10.
Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10
years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday of January 2001 and will
bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment
resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the
assessment resolution under December 31, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due shall be
added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire
assessment of such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk/Treasurer.
No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk/Treasurer the entire amount of the
assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment
is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through
December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given
above the rate of interest that will apply is eight percent (8 %) per year.
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount
of the proposed assessment is $622,495. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting.
No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed
with the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may
upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an
adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners, as it deems advisable.
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be as
follows:
1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by
narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each
witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This
procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further
questions.
2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or
present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for
questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's
witnesses.
3. The objector may be represented by counsel.
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be
considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or
testimony presented to the council.
5. The entire proceedings will be tape- recorded (video- taped).
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final
presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence
may be presented at this point.
7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing.
An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by
serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within thirty (30) after the adoption of
the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the
Mayor or Clerk.
City Clerk
Week in review — Mayor Tom Wilharber 13 Sep 00
1. Meeting with Lino Lakes, Hugo mayors and staff along with Darrell Silverness
from the future new YMCA in Lino Lakes concerning their development.
2. Meeting with Principal Kathy Millington, Centerville Elementary School
concerning the P.L.A.Y. project that the councils and Police Commission had
turned down. /0o STA f P, 97V Syr Q c,7J
3. Meeting with Dick Hubers, Eagle Trucking on time line for building.
4. Meeting with Mayor John Bergeson, Lino Lakes on stadium in Lino Lakes
along our border (Socko).
5. Meeting with Father Tom Fitzgerald, pastor of St Genevieve's church in
Centerville concerning land next to park. The possibility of the church combing
with St John's in Hugo.
!. Uoc vaTenx coke
Se•••••c
•
estrieve glee llecd 40
-1 € ; .i /Ve•n dS
SEP -13 -00 04:13 PM MONTRNRRI HOMES INC. 651 275 0678 P.01
MONTANARI HOMES, INC.
September 13, 2000
Rs.. Lot 2 Buechler Estates
Mound Trail
Cemerville, MN
Dar Jim March,
Montahari Homes, Inc. is writing this letter to request an over weight permit for new construction at 1253
Mound Trail, M Centerville, MN. we are asking Por is mute for 7A tons. Please tet us know right away
to the answer regarding the request
Thank Youl
of antui
President Montanari Homes, Inc
Thom. A76;0010
MEMO
DATE : September 7, 2000
TO : Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM: Jim March
RE : 2001 Fete des Lacs Committee Structure
Mr. Ray Devine has requested that the following item be placed on the agenda as new
business. Mr. Devine is proposing a formal structure for the 2001 Fete des Lacs
Committee. Enclosed is the outline for the plan. It is important that the committee
structure is decided soon so that this group can start the work for planning next year's
celebration.
Memorandum
To: City of Centerville City Council Members
From: Ray DeVine, Fete des Lacs
Date: 8 -30 -00
Subject: 2001 Festival Committee
The 2001 city celebration is coming up quickly and I am recommending to
the City Council that we set -up an official committee to plan the event next
year. I feel that this process needs to be done fair and I have spoken to a lot
of people who feel this is the correct way to go.
There are several issues that need immediate attention for next year's event.
I would like to have a meeting; with the members of the new 2001 Festival
Committee by Oct. 19, 2000. In order to do this we will need to advertise
these openings and fill the se\ en seats rather quickly. Enclosed, please find
more information on how the committee could be structured and how we
could fill the seats on the committee.
One of these issues, that need ; immediate attention, is the land located north
of Laurie Lamotte Park. Last year, we were allowed to use 1 acre of this
land at a cost of $200. It would be in the cities best interest to secure this
land for next years celebration. I feel this is something we want to approach
the church about right away. 1 am asking for the City Council to approve the
sending of his letter to the church.
If you have any questions or need clarifications please feel free to give me a
call.
Ray DeVinc
Fete des Lacs Committee
651- 407 -18 )0 or
ray @rayde' ine.com
.
Smactrow titea94 digeteatet jot 20011
My ideas for the 2001 Festival Committee have been derived from my
experience in planning and staging the 2000 Fete des Lacs, from
countless hours of talking with members of last years committee and
countless hours of discussions with other members of the community.
I feel we need a more structured committee, not because I think the
event will be more successful, but rather to spread out the workload
and try to minimize some of the issues that arose last year, when we
worked as an informal committee. I feel last year, because we were
pioneering new trails and breaking the mold of what had been done in
the past, it was necessary to have an informal committee. We are
hopefully wiser now and learned a lot last year.
Legal Issues
My ideas for the committee for next year consist essentially of a
seven - member committee, similar to the park and rec or EDC
committee. I have attached a set of bylaws created from looking at
the bylaws of our current city committees. Also, all meetings would
be open and would follow "Roberts Rules of Order."
Appointment
I would suggest we contact our committee from last year and
residents that helped in other volunteer capacities and invite them to
submit a "letter of interest." I would also recommend we advertise
the openings on the sign at city hall and in the Quad Community
Press. It would be fair at that point for the city council to review the
letters and consider who was involved in the event last year when
making appointments. I am confident we would find the seven
necessary members without further problems.
What would these 7 people do?
I have enclosed a sketch outlining what each member of the committee would be
responsible for. I am confident that some if not all of these members would need
several people working with them to accomplish these items in a timely manner.
This outline may need to be adjusted, I was not directly involved in all of these
areas of the 2000 Fete des Lacs and do not have a Firm grasp of what it takes to
put on some of these events.
1. Parade, Main Stage
2. Carnival, VIP Night, fireworks
3. Donations, sponsorship, legalities, Raffle
4. Advertising, Volunteers, Coordinate W/ Lions & other
local groups
5. Street Dance, Teen dance, Craft Fair /Business Exposition
6. Parking, First Aid, security, Set -up, Clean -up, placement of events, tents,
RR, Trash, electrical
7. Softball Tournament
Each committee member would be required to submit the following information in
a timely manner to the rest of the committee:
• Preliminary budget
• Concerns that the operations crew or security crew needs to know about.
• Plan of how their event would be laid out
• Number of volunteers they will need
• Final budget
• Advertising requirements and highlights
These are only guidelines to show what each committee member will be
responsible for. As I have said all along, we will need to have some sub-
committees under these seven members. It will be the responsibility of the
committee member to handle securing a sub - committee if necessary and
handling meetings of the sub - committee.
In conclusion!
As I said, this structure plan was derived through much hard work
and conversation with others in the community. I could not begin to
list all of the things that we as a committee learned last year. One
thing we did learn is that we need a more formal structure to our
group. That is also the main reason I want to inform last years Fete
des Lacs committee of the opportunity to be part of the planning this
upcoming year. All of the members of last year's committee learned
a lot this past year and we can't lose that knowledge.
I appreciate all the support I have received from the council on this
matter. I will be in attendance at the next city council meeting to
answer any questions that may arise. As always, I would like to
thank you in advance for your consideration.
Ray DeVine
Fete des Lacs Committee
City of Centerville
Festival Committee
Bylaws
Purpose: the Festival Committee is hereby established in the City of Centerville with the
purpose of planning and staging the annual city celebration.
Composition: the Festival committee shall be composed of seven volunteers.
Committee members do not have to live within the City of Centerville. The City
Attorney, City Engineer, Building Inspector, City Staff and Public Works Department
shall be official advisors to the committee and may be asked to attend meetings to help
with decisions.
Term of office: members shall serve a one (1) year term, commencing the second
meeting after the event. The Committee shall supply a recommendation to the City
Council after the first meeting after the event. At the second meeting after the event the
committee shall appoint a Chair and Co -Chair from within the members of the
committee.
Vacancies: vacancies occurring during the term shall be filled for the remainder of the
current term by majority vote of the members. ? -Ka e;4 Qe wc; 1
Removal from office: any member of the committee can be removed by a 4/5 vote of
the City Council.
Secretary: a city staff liaison or ether staff member will be responsible for creating
minutes. Attendance at the meetings is not required, in which case the meeting will be
tape recorded for purposes of creating minutes.
Meetings: the Festival Committee shall conduct at least one meeting per month and
could hold as many meetings as necessary to properly plan the event. All Festival
Committee meetings will be open to the public and a Quorum is required to take a vote
on something.
Quorum: a quorum shall be a 417 majority, also no action can be taken on any one
particular event unless the person responsible for that event is present or has written to a
member of the committee or staff his/her approval to act on said event.
Procedure: The Festival Committee can adopt rules for the transaction of business, shall
keep a record of all motions, resohitions, transactions, findings, minutes and reports.
These shall be reduced to writing and a copy forwarded to each member for review and
approval at the following monthly meeting. An agenda will be prepared by the
Chairperson or City staff and distributed to all in attendance at the start of each meeting.
Dear
First of all, I would like to thank you once again for helping plan
and put on the city celebration this past year!!
Now that the dust has settled, it is time to start planning next year's event. I
have very high expectations for next year's city celebration. I would like to
see increased attendance. I'd like to see the church, Boy Scouts, Cub Scouts
and the elementary school get involved. I'd like to lower the price of the
carnival, and bring in more rides for teens. I'd like to do more with the
sponsorship program and the volunteers, offer them a discount night at the
carnival! I have high expectations and they may not all come true, but we
need to start doing it.
One of the many things we learned last year, is that the committee needs to
be more structured this year. I think for the first year, we needed to be
informal, we needed to pioneer new pathways, and we did that. This year
we will have a more formal committee as well as the sub - committees. We
will have seven voting members who will be in charge of different areas of
the festival, then we will have si lb- committees under these 7 members that
will work on each individual event. The only fair way to place these seven
members on the committee is to ask for "letters of interest" and let the
Council decide. Again, I want to say if you don't want to be a voting
member on the "Committee" that's OK, we will still have sub - committees,
and everyone is invited to the meetings.
Please fill out the form enclosed and drop it off at city hall. I am hoping
to have the people who were active in helping last year, help with this year
to plan a great event. It is important that you fill out this form right away
and return it to city hall so we can have a meeting soon! The deadline for
accepting "letters of interest" is Sept. 22, 2000. For legal reasons we will
not accept any letters after this date. The council will be appointing
members to the committee on Oct. 4, 2000. The first meeting will likely be
Oct. 19, 2000, more information will be forthcoming.
Please call me if you have any questions at all!
Ray DeVine
651- 407 -1800
August 29, 2000
The Church of St. Genevieve
1664 Heritage St.
Centerville, MN 55038
Attn: Gene Noll
Dear Parish Council members,
As I'm sure most of you are aware the City of Centerville's Fete des Lacs
committee used the vacant church 1 €.nd, located north of Laurie Lamotte Park, as a
parking area for the "larger than evcr" city celebration this past July. We had a financial
arrangement with Henry Cardinal. under stand Mr. Cardinal leases the land from you on
a verbal agreement for about $364.( 0 per rear to farm hay. The financial arrangement
we had with Henry was for paymem of $2 )0. In return we were allowed to park on about
1 acre of the land. The land we use, l was i nvaluable to the city celebration, and was very
appreciated. We are planning the 2) )01 city celebration in much the same way. We are
hoping to expand the events and attcndanc a as well as the parking area. We are also
considering changing the date of the event at this time, no date has been selected.
We would like to enter into . t writt, In agreement with the Church of St.
Genevieve. This agreement would : dlow 1 s the use of the vacant land for the city
celebration and would allow Henry Cardir al to use the land to farm hay. We would be
willing to lease this parcel of land fi om th, church for $500 per year for as many years as
the church would be comfortable w th. I f 'el this arrangement would benefit everyone in
the community. I have enclosed a simple lease agreement. We would be ready and
willing to enter into this agreement mytin e in the near future.
I would also encourage the t hurch to take an active role in the city celebration
next year, there are tons of opportui ities f if fundraisers at this event. Last year we
estimate attendance at about 3,000) eople. next year we are shooting for 5,000. I would
be willing to talk with a group of pa rishioi ers or the church council about some ideas I
have.
If possible, I would like this letter o be put on the next Church Council meeting
agenda for Monday Sept. 25, 2000. I will be in attendance at the Church Council
meeting that evening. I look forwai d to al swering your questions at that time. I would
like to thank you in advance for yot r cone deration.
Thank you,
?0-
Ray DeVine
Fete des Lacs Committee
MEMO
Date: September 8, 2000
To: Honorable Mayor and Council
From: Jill Lien
Re: Holiday Party
I have contacted several restaurants for the Holiday Party dinner for Council
and Staff. Most have already been reserved, but I have found two (2) that
have openings for December 9th and 16 Included are copies of the menus,
from the Shorewood Restaurant, which is located in Fridley on Highway 65
near Interstate 694, and from Majestic Oaks, which is located on Bunker
Lake Boulevard in Ham Lake. If Council selects the Shorewood Restaurant,
we are able to choose three (3) entree choices from the Banquet Menu
(included). if Council selects Majestic Oaks, we are able to choose from 3 -
4 items from the Oaks Restaurant Menu, or we could select one item from
the catering menu (not included), which carries a price range of $15.95 -
$18.95. We would be in the Terrace Room which seats up to 50 people. I
have already put a tentative hold on Majestic Oaks for December 9 due to
the fact that these weekends are being booked fast, and we have already lost
December 2 I will need to confirm or decline on Thursday after your
selections of the restaurant and date are made. We are also requesting
staff's meals and all appetizers be paid for by the City.
Thank you for your consideration!
Shorewood Restaurant'
Banquet Menu
571 -3444
Prime Rib $19.95 Walieve Pike Almondine 517.95
Slowly Roasted & served with Aa Jos Broiled or pan fried with Almonds
•
•
Filet canon 519.95 Spa Salmon $17.95
This is the most tender of all moats! Fresh Salmon filet grilled 4 served
Grilled and served with B4arnaise Sauce with fresh Julienne Vegetables
New York..teak 519.95 Broiled Salnpn 517.95
Grilled & topped with mushrooms & Fresh salmon filet broiled to perfection
served with South American Sauce
Greyly Shrine 519.50
Roast Peppered Ribeye $19.95 Shrine baked in casserole with Grecian Tomato
Marinated in South American sauce and olive Sauce and feta cheese
oil and served with Piquant Sauce
Broiled Shrimp 519.50
Roasted Striolion 517.95 Juicy shrimp broiled to perfection and
Sliced t served with Mushroom Brown Sauce served with garlic butter
Chicken Oscar 515.95 Garlic Shrive 519.50
Sauteed chicken breast with asparagus, crab Shrimp sauteed with olive oil. garlic & sweet basil
meat and served with Hollandaise Sauce
Chicken In Phvllo 516.95 Sroi3ed Shrinp 519.50
kicker, spinach, feta cheese & pinenuts Juicy shrikes broiled to perfection and
_rapped in phyllo and baked golden brown served with garlic butter
Chicken Gordan Bleu 515.95 Surf & Turf 523.95
Rolled chicken breast, filled with feu cheese A 7 os. beef tenderloin & sbriep combination
and ham served with Hollandaise Sauce
Caiun Qricken Linguine $14,95
Gyros 514.95 Grilled chicken breast served over linguine
Ours is the bests Greek Roast seasoned with with a spicy Jalepano Cream Sauce
herbs and spices
Orcken Fe tuccine Primavera 514.95
Lobster Teil (market Dr /re Fettuccine in our Alfredo Sauce with chicken
Largest Lobster: 1.5 pounds of mouth- watering and garden fresh vegetables
delectable lobster
All our entrees are accompanied with our louse salad, Idaho baked potfto, vegetables, bread, cheese
spread and country butter. Coffee, tea and milk is included with groups of 20 or sere.
General Information
Your =MI selection of three (3) entree choices or less should be submitted to the Shorewood no later
than two weeks prior or your scheduled function. All prices are subject to 6.5% sales tax and 15%
gratuity. A small non - refundable deposit is required. In the event of cancellations, a 24 hour
notification is required or the group will be charged according to previous menu confirmation. we do
open on Sundays for parties of 100 people or more. Extra food cannot be taken out of the
restaurant. we thank you for thinking of the Shorewood.
Ask us about our wide selection of appetizers, hors d' oeuvres, desserts and
wines nede especially to satisfy your party needs.
l'd WOMB Vidbv7:ei Seal. —Qrc —t
FILE No.377 03.24 '00 0634 ID:Slternative Re5ouroes FAX :612 765 2144 PAGE 1
CQAKS
TF r(c Cc.
G0L LUB
i
Two 18 -hole Champtonahip Golf Courses plus an Executive Nine
Clubhouse featuring "The Oaks" (Restaurant and Bar)
Beautiful Banquet & Meeting Facilities for 10-500 People
TO: (1111
FAX NUMBER: (03) 1 4251 a gb � )
FROM:
DATE: g--2_"/ ' TIME:
Total Number of Pages Including Transmission Sheet: ,3
SPE I_AL INSTRUCTIONS:
(
cfrturylundwn _
C714ad C fjz (
IF PROBLEMS, CALL (612) 756 -2140
701 Bunker Lake Boulevard Hain Lake, MN 65804
Clubhouse: 755 -2140
Fax: 755 -2144 Pro Shop: 755 -2142
FILE No.377 08/24 '00 02 ID:Slternative Resources FAX:612 755 2144 PAGE 2
Ap19(tiztri Crab
Stuffed Potato Skins Potato skins stuffed with Gads served in homemade bread bowl, except :,a Rest
chopped bacon, cheddar cheese, mozzarella cheese, and
green onions. Served with sour ct cam , ..5.50 Shanghai Chicken - Crisp greens, bok -ahoy; peapods
Spinach Artichoke Pip - Fresh spinach, and bean sprats tossed ir. a teriyaki dressing. Garnished
artichoke hearts, and parmesan cheese. Served with with orange slices, sesame seeds, fried wonton skins
toast points... 695 and teriyaki marinated chicken breast... 6.95
Shrimp Cocktail - Jumbo Sze chilled shrimp served
with eodctail sauce and a lemon.. . 695 (a Fiesta - Tomato, Sack olives, green onions, cheddar
Chicken or Beef QlresadiNa • Grilles tortilla shells cheese and mixed greens in a fresh made tortilla shell.
layered with choice of meat cheddar cheese, mozzarel a Served with salsa, sour cream and guacamole. Seasoned
cheese, and green onions. Served with sour cream and ground beef... 6.95 Seasoned chicken... 735
salsa... 6.5D
Macho Nachos • A mound of warm tortilla chirps Chicken Caesar Salad - Crisp ro maine, seasoned
covered whh shredded lettuce. spicy beef or chkken, croutons and fresh shredded parmesan ins
mozzarella cheese, cheddar cheese, olives, tomatoes, sod with our
and onions, .. 795 homemade assess dressing and topped with a grilled,
Not So Macho Nachos - A hot plate of tortilla chips marinated chicken breast... 6.95
and cheeses, .. 395 Chef Salad • Julienned ham turkey, ,
Sampler Platter • large plate of "Macho Nachos" , swiss cheese, 1
Chicken Fingers, Potato Skins, Buffalo Wings and black k :merlon s ... 6 crisp greens, tomato wedges, eggs and
Mozzarella Sticks... 895 oli lives... 6 95
Chicken Wings • Served plain, buffab or teriyaki Strawberry Chicken - Mixed greens, grilled chicken
style... 6.95 breast, sweet summer strawberries, mandarin oranges,
Oaks Chili • Served in cur own fresh baked • toped with poppy -seed dressing and txsted sunflower
bread bowl... 395
Home -made Sou Ask seeds... 75C
Soup - your server... cup ...195
bawl .. , 2.95 Suggested wines: Woodbridge white Zinfandel or BUYlWnpa
Drummies • Golder brown, breaded chicken drummies chardonnay
served with honey mustard... 5,95
Mozzarella Slicks - 8 .. / " - » *—
Breaded cheese sticks .. 6.95
Fooaooia Pizza Soot - traditional favorites on a
;acacia loaf, You're choice of pepperoni, sausage, cheese t } or vegetarian... 6.95 „*
, r r4
Waffle Fries Basket... 4.95 '" 1 "" if . ;
Onion Rings Basket ... 595 ' miler'
a Wint.r W udbri) Whir, Zi.d'a,,d. u 6 Cu � � '".
snsraOr�nay uu ;riu -.�
Soggesce
4
FILE No.377 0824 '00 09:36 ID:Slternative Resources FAX :612 755 2144 FAGS 3
• i 4 Y fie ` - _t
CaYel Sxn.3 jtief
Stroked Turkey Club - Tender snaked turkey, tomato, lettuce, bacon and provolone cheese. Served or
toast with stall mayo... 6.55
pl Cubh il k
ig . , half Serve • Boon ,:s35
15 , on }roar lettuce, wh ale chtomal>?ler ..of , mesa .525 toaste and d fresh
. - :got
Turk eyo bad.. 6 95
Sitt � 'rdwlck • Your ±oice of chicken or tuna
sd. S on a bakery fresh c roissant .. 5.95 "
Dli S • Your choice o f c hicken salad, t sa ham, turkey, roost ixef or corned beef,
sli ...
A • " - Si: • Bacon, lettuce and tomato.. .535
tt i . Suggested wines: Ros es rr niner w /�urng or a:a,peridge
boas
All burgers t s sandwiches served with a choice of Het Sf
fr g e s chi Midwest Pork Tenderloin • pork tenderloin
, Ps rr potato salad. hand - breaded and fried golden brown. Served on a
Toasted bun... 6.75
,r ' n r e r Grilled Reuben • Generous portion of corned beef,
d ecuerlcrout, swiss cheese and thousand island dressing.
Served on grilled pumpernickel bread... 6.25
A.G.C. Burger • 1/2 pound char - grilled burger served French Dip • Thin sliced roast beef on a grilled
with grilled onions, american cheese, bacon, lettuce and french roil served with aujus... 6.50 With matted
tomato with mayonnaise on the side... 5.95 pion.. . . 695
• Sauteed mushrooms, green onions,
Swiss Surge ma e Turkey or Beef - Served open -faced with real
and swiss cheese... 5.95 , gravy and fresh vegetpbfe. 730
Nestle Philiy • Choice of chicken or beef smothered
Famous Bull Burger - A 11/2 pound masterpiece with sauteed mushrooms, onions, green peppers and
topped with emotion area swiss cheese, raw red onion, melted manfiereyTack cheese. Served on a toasted
tomato, lettuce and bacon. Served with homemade B50 hoagie bun... 6 25
sauce on the side.. .12.95 Focaecia Chicken Sandwich - Six ounce chicken
breast gelled and served on a faraccia bread with twee,
Patty Melt • Oar- broiled it your liking, tapped wkh .bacon, melted provolone and sprouts... 6.95
onions, peppers, mushrooms and swiss cheese... 595 BBQ Pork Sandwich - slow roasted shredded perk
Bacon S•Chtest Burger • Swiss, amerkan and in our homemade BBQ sauce... 6.50
cheddar cheeses topped with bacon slices. Served with battered otter Dipped Cod Sandwich- a m own cod
BBQ sauce on the side... 5.95 grilled h and s .. 6.25
served open-faced on a
9rliled hoagie... 6.?S
Suggested wines: Ecca Domani M-not or Ga,io of ).,nnina Sugge3ted wines: R eserve St, Marcia Merht ur Vithon
a.aktrnlc ihansuenar
FILE No.377 08/24 '00 03:37 ID:Slternative Resources FAX:612 755 2144 PAGE 4
t
All IMMO are senile with ohcru of eouo or nose salad and
u chdca of potato or rice. 5uosttlute hmfdr:owns for $1,50
Stleaki .
House Steak • 10 ounce choice New lbrk broiled to
your liking Serve with sauteed mushrooms and onion,
straws. —54.95
Ribeye Steak - par- grilled ribeye. Served with
sauteed mushrooms and on straws -12 at , .14.95 . alltia2Etta
16 ot. ..16.95
filet Mignon • i3 ours filet wrapped in bacon,, crokod
r told and Ail perm deals mod with
You Nog tapped wkh sauteed mushrooms a soup or salad and fresh baked bread
onion straws...1795 Pasta Primavera • Steak Sandwich - 8 ounce New York served garlic and a variety of fresh v Fettuccine tossed with ol etables... C95 5e oil,
open -faced on toast wilfi sauteed mushrooms and flaked Lasagna • lasagna noodles layered with three
onion straws. ..1295 meals, onions, mariner° and plenty of cheese. Served
Add shrimp to your streak, broiled, with fresh bake bread. ..1095
breaded or vompi ... 5,95 Chicken Alftteda - Sauteed chicken
task' Y � , cream, garlic and
S :iggw.ted Winuti ii:. s'I.
'YUCti Cat.-C 'a Tana a MwaIn srwaaning tti'eeed with f�.rthtgfr and Arinhad ....L reed
/ parmesan the topped with shredded anemic ..
• +�`ott f tyl Welt mired ..>3�
tf .Jumbo Shrimp • 5jumbo shrimp garlic broiled,
beer battered, or scampi ...1795
Semboa amore ceased Fiiday g Saturday Stir -Fry - Terryakki style beef or chicken, oriental
Ask your serer far selections. .vegetables served over steamed rice with fried
House Smoked wry Back Ribs wantons.. 14$5 Shrimp ...1795
full slab ...1495 to slab ... 995 Seafood Pbs'ta Fettucine - Flavored tomato basil
op, Chicken $ Ribs • 3 pieces of fetlucine, shrimp, scallops wend with fresh garlic,
fried chicken and 1/2 slab SSG white wine, herbs and fresh vegetables finished in a
ribe...13.95 dl wfiiie thicken add 150 Bonet° broth • • .2.95
Oaks Fried Chicken Chicken Gaon Porta • Slackens ohlcken breast
3 pieces . , . 835 5 pieces ...10.95 served with a spiry area* sauce, and fresh vegetables
Midwest Fork Met - Breaded pork mist wi#r mashed tossed with fettucine ... 1395
potoee and peppered county style gravy ...1Q95 Lemon Pepper Chicken Pasta • Chlaken breast
Norio Homer* Plata - Ask your server for breaded and seasoned with Iron pepper, sauteed
tonight's featured 12 inch pizza and price. and served over a bed of lemon pepper linguine with
vegetabeis and finished with olive oil ...1295
.them:.,.: Wii Nle: t •i.ri Y haluiiSGYI filcaf i:C u, ii LITT"no:
CNoVrAgay
::aL;.r Wiiiaa: le hikers lfiuu' :...” ' .si L... i }.,..44..1 Wl.0 ivl
I { L INQ..:( r VV /L4 V'.i VV•.)( 11. Itc I CL IVC KC:OlIt' 5 ' HA •01.:. 'CA') C1
I
`NGL J
.*
..
iStxraW .
The Oaks Own Desserts
„.
•
Cheesecake du Jour • See server for ` °'', ,.
selections... 2.95 ` ? : :,... ' '
Tra c miao • Italian sccngeake bored with espresso and - -- - — ---
acgt maacarpone cheese custard with a hint of chocolate. 7Dei* ter* it sik yaw sent a{4nt baapt
.. 3.50 hates,. 41 maw loiter tzar rite darts lit -wale
fmeA ker. at Atefroit odes.
Choaoiele Tunis Cake • Rich devil's food c'aka.
layered with chocolate fudge, roasted pecans and ;Orr'
caramel... 2.95 We pr+ast yjy may!
English Lace Tors • Light layered with - -. a p1hA f
lemon and cream... 125
Suggest /0 Wires. Gauls) of Sonoma Cabern.t or lakes Parties of 4 or mom wit as placed an one b41
iutiatokls.r sdesurtg
;nc ssparore Rolm) cwth 15% davits charge Included.
• Fnan rite.: oaf`
y Tap Beer Can Beer
M!!!er Lire P _ Coors Light
MGD „_
Miller Lice
.u•+IEs PAGE Leinenkugel MGO
Bottle Beer Killian iitd Michelob Golden Light
Jamie Aga Pie Ale Michelob Golden Light Michelob Golden Draft
James Page Amber Lager Budweiser Killion!
Mkalob Budweiser
Leinenkugei Budweiser Bud Light
' seekers - Mtn • • G'Daui'r
MEMO
DATE : September 8, 2000
TO : Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM: Jim March
RE : Proposed Chain of Lakes YMCA
Included in your packet is some information that was retrieved from a meeting that was
held vii September 7, 2000. This information is for discussion purposes Only. It Vrlii be
important to discuss this proposal prior to adopting our final levy for taxes payable in
2001. I want Council to be aware of the potential financial commitment that could be
made to this project.
The YMCA of Greater Saint Paul & The City of Lino Lakes
Draft Development Agreement Highlights
1. City of Lino Lakes Capital Fund raising commitment of $2,000,000.
• $1,500,000 in Cash
• $500,000 in Land & Infrastructure
• Payment & Land transfer to be made once construction begins
2. YMCA of Greater Saint Paul's commitment to build and operate a YMCA facility of
approximately 40,000 square feet that includes:
• Swimming Pools
• Gymnasium
• Teen Center
• Child Watch
• Kid's Gym
• Aerobic Studio
• Strength & Cardio Equipment Room
• Walking/Running Track
• Male, Female and Family Lockerooms
• Lobby
• Offices
3. Length of Agreement will be Fifteen Years.
4. The YMCA will build and operate a free drop -in Teen Center for the length of the
agreement.
5. The YMCA will rcducc joining fees by 25% for City of Lino Lakes residents for the
length of the agreement.
6. The YMCA will reduce monthly membership rates by 10% for use of this new Chain
of Lakes YMCA for City of Lino Lakes residents for the length of the agreement.
7. The YMCA will provide 4 Community Nights each year free to City of Lino Lakes
residents for the length of the agreement.
Participation Options Draft — September 7, 2000
* Based on estimates of population
Circle Pines = 5,000
Hugo = 6,500
Centerville = 2,500
Lexington = 2,500
Lino Lakes = 20,000
City of Circle Pines $166,666 - 5 year agreement $ 33,333 for 5 years
333 333 — 10 year agreement $333,333 ent $ 66 666 for 5
Y g years
Y
$500,000 — 15 year agreement $100,000 for 5 years
City of Hugo $216,666 — 5 year agreement $ 43,333 for 5 years
$433,333 — 10 year agreement $ 86,666 for 5 years
$650,000 — 15 year agreement $130,000 for 5 years
City of Centerville $ 83,333 - 5 year agreement $ 16,666 for 5 years
$166,666 — 10 year agreement $ 33,333 for 5 years
$250,000 —15 year agreement $ 50,000 for 5 years
City of Lexington $ 83,333 — 5 year agreement $ 16,666 for 5 years
$166,666 — 10 year agreement $ 33,333 for 5 years
$250,000 — 15 year agreement $ 50,000 for 5 years
Chain of Lakes YMCA Capital Campaign
Fund Raising Report — September 7' 2000
Gifts Secured To Date
City of Lino Lakes — Cash & Land $2,000.000
Molin Concrete — Cash & Product 250,000
John & Eleanor Yackel 250,000
Centennial School District — Program agreement pending 125,000
Glenn Rehbein Companies — Earthwork est. 100,000
Northern Technologies 60,000
Lino Lakes State Bank 50,000
Gary Uhde — GM Development 50,000
American Guidance Services, Inc. 50,000
AdGraphics 50,000
Fairview Lakes Regional Medical Center & Foundation 50,000
Kraus Anderson Midwest Construction Company 25,000
United Community Network 8,000
Darrell & Bev Silverness 5,000
Dwight Benoy — Professional Roofing Services 5,000
Ten Board Members @ $5,000 50,000
Two Board Members @ $2,000 4,000
Nine Board Members @ $1,000 9,000
Friends of Lino Parks Foundation 1,000
Festival Foods /Knowlans 1,000
Total Raised to date: $3,126,000
Long Term Financing: $1,500,000
To Date: Total committed to project: $4,626,000
YMCA Capital Gift Chart for the New YMCA project
9/00
$6 Million+ project
# of Gifts $ Amount Cumulative Total Progress
1 2,000,000 2,000,000 1 gift
1 1,000,000 3,000,000
2 500,000 4,000,000
3 250,000 4,750,000 2 gifts
4 100,000 5,150,000 2 gifts
6 50,000 5,450,000 6 gifts
10 25,000 5,700,000 1 gift
15 10,000 5,850,000 1 gifts
20 5,000 5,950,000 12 gifts
25 1,000 5,975,000 15 gifts
50 500 6,000,000
100 100 6,010,000
• Chain of Lakes YMCA Board
Class of 2000, 2001 & 2003 & Board Leadership
Class of 2001 Class of 2002 Class of 2003
Dan Anderson Pastor Charlie Brown Gary Hook
Lawrence Biehn Mark Groff Matjaz Koroscc
Craig Bode Howard Juni Janet McGough
Blake Gorowsky Dr. Kellie Kershisnik Jennifer Kromrey
John McClellan Monte McCoy John Christianson
Mike Muske John Milbauer Jeff O'Donnell
Steve Pech Dr. Richard Ottomeyer Rick Carlson
Mark Rehbein Kara Palas Paul Montain
Linda Waite Smith Kim Sullivan
Kadi Johnson Elise Tagg
Michelle Vanselow John Yackel
Board Leadership
Board Chair: John Milbauer
Board 1" Vice Chair: John McClellan
Board 2"`' Vice Chair: Elise Tagg
Y Partners Campaign Chair: Kim Sullivan
Y Partners Vice Chair: Howard Juni
Finance Committee Chair: Elise Tagg
Program Committee Chair: Kara Palas
Facilities Committee Chair: Mark Groff
Board Development Committee Chair: Pastor Charlie Brown
Capital Campaign Chair: open
YMCA Executive Director: Darrell Silverness
Chain of Lakes YMCA
2000 — 2001 Committee Charts of Work
FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
• Monitor 2000 Operating Budget
• Review and approve operating & capital budget for 2001
• Monitor 2001 Operating Budget
• Direct Y Partners Annual Fund Raising Campaign - $35,000
• Direct Annual Golf Tournament - $20,000
BOARD /VOLUNTEER DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
• Volunteer Identification
• Board Recruitment /Orientation/Involvement
• Board Education
• Board Evaluation
• Recommends Board Candidates, Terns & Officers
PROGRAM COMMITTEE
• Develop monthly teen events
• Develop monthly family events
• Ensure timeliness of program promotion
• Survey community re: program needs /wants & teen interest
• Ensure core values are emphasized
FACILITIES COMMITTEE
• Assist with selection of arch/contractor
• Develop design plan — site plan/elevations for promotional use
• Develop cost estimates for new facility
CAPTIAL CAMPAIGN STEERING COMMITTEE
• Raise needed Capital dollars — minimum $1.5 million
• Identify and recruit Capital Campaign Chairperson
s •
YMCA of Greater Saint Paul
Strategic Plan
1998 --2002
YMCA
We build strong kids,
strong families, strong communities. ities.
YMCA of Greater Saint Paul
Long Range Strategic Planning Process
Chair: Don Gruber
The YMCA of Greater Saint Paul is engaged in the process of formulating a vision and strategies
for the next five years.
The Association Leadership Council has met since March, 1997 to review societal trends,
demographic projections and YMCA trend lines.
In October, 1997 the Association Leadership Council held a strategic planning retreat to draft a
vision and strategies for the next five years. These will be presented to the Executive Committee
of the General Board for review on November 5, 1997.
From there, the executive staff will be asked to develop association objectives to achieve these
strategies. The total plan will then be presented to the General Board on February 4, 1998, for
approvaL Within this framework, branch.boards and staff will develop branch objectives, and
staff will develop branch annual plans to cany out those objectives.
The Association 1999 Annual Plan will then be framed in accordance with the long term
strategies.
yam: -y' _ ' •Alin ; Jl I ' ;Ry_ SIP
;�II_
Don Gruber, Chair G. Scott Goyer Bob Olafson
Lynn Anderson -Scott Vance Haesemeyer Pat Riemersma
Russ Barrett Peggy Hedback Brian Rupe
Cheryl Baughn Tom Holland Deanna Sande
Beth Baumann Karen Holzer Phil Scearcy
Kelly Beenan Steve Howard Andy Shem
Torn Brinsko Al Imhoff Darrell Silvemess
Robert Burow Leann Lasure Tim Staley
Don Chapdelaine Patricia Love Rolf Thompson
Kathy Cheng Patty McGrath Joseph Ulrey
John Duntley Larry Mitchell Jim Wazlawik
Susie Gilbert Laura Oberst Robert (Skip) Wilke
Jeri Glick - Anderson Facilitator: Pat Lynch
,v
YMCA
We build strong kids,
strong families, strong conununiti
YMCA of Greater Saint Paul
Strategic Plan
1998 -2002
The YMCA of Greater Saint Paul, as a part of its commitment to stewardship and service, has
prepared this strategic plan to guide decision - making and evaluate programs.
This plan will incorporate five segments:
I. Mission Statement
II. Vision Statement
III. Strategies
IV. Association Objectives
V. Branch Annual Plans
The first three components have been the focus of volunteer and staff study since March 1997.
They were crafted and reviewed by numerous groups and reflect the consensus view. The last
two components will be developed by staff and volunteer teams to carry through the vision and
strategies outlined herein.
,v
YMCA
We build strong kids,
strong families, strong coinmwuties
YMCA of Greater Saint Paul
Mission Statement
The YMCA of Greater Saint Paul practices Christian values by providing opportunities for everyone
to build strong kids, strong families and strong communities.
Vision Statement
The YMCA of Greater Saint Paul will be a leading force in the community by:
• Emphasizing core values of caring, honesty, respect and responsibility in all we do.
• Collaborating to better serve kids, families and communities.
• • Promoting healthy spirit, mind and body for all ages.
• Providing fun, meaningful experiences and a place to belong.
Strategies
The YMCA of Greater. Saint Paul will advance the mission and vision of the Association over the
next five years by focusing on the following strategies. We will:
• Create capital for investment in new program or facility opportunities, and for program
participation by low- income individuals.
• Expand programs and facilities to serve high -need and high - growth East Metro communities.
East Metro communities are defined as St. Paul, surrounding suburbs and the St. Croix Valley.
• Substantially increase teen program participation.
• Advance our mission and programs through collaborative relationships with:
— Public, private and nonprofit organizations.
— The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis.
• Develop new ways to infuse fun, meaning and a sense of belonging into our YMCA programs
and facilities.
• Position the YMCA as the organization that promotes healthy spirit, mind and body for all ages.
�v
YMCA
We build strong kids,
strong families, strong cotnrnunities
1
MEMO
DATE : September 8, 2000
TO : Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM: Jim March
RE : Storm Sewer Realignment - Lloyd Drilling (1873 Main Street)
As you may recall, Council previously discussed a request from Lloyd Drilling for
permission to realign storm sewer that exists at the property across the street from City
Hall. The current storm sewer runs between the existing vacant commercial lot and the
existing home at 1873 Main Street.
At a previous meeting, Council chose not to grant this request until it was determined
whether or not a Rice Creek Watershed Permit would be required for this site. Included
in your packet is a memo from the RCWD stating that a permit would not be required for
the development of this site. The only reason a pent was required for the stripmall on
the west side of Peterson Trail is because a small area of wetland previously existed on
that site.
I would recommend that this request be approved. City Engineer Tom Peterson has
previously reviewed this proposed realignment.
9 -08 -2202 11 :S8AM FROM THURSTON'S 6128266266 P.1
• - 09/06/2000 15: 41 651- 766-4196 RICE GREEK W DIST PACE e1
A, N.
9
Rice Creek Wsiterszed • ♦ µ .,
3563 N.l trdowN AVENUE. sum 330 in it
ARDEN NUL MINNESOTA 537264036
PHONE (WI 7'66 • TAX I6l1) 7664t95
Lloyd Drilling
e% fhursten's Invelry d! t Nww.m -.. 'F• �... hyp
705 West Lek Street e1 t rr a' "A101
Mpls, MN 39405 ltd: coed ai Awe
t
R ithys
e: Centerville Project at Sltann Z tAtew s Hall
KATE OREWRt• Oiadtt Aden
September 6, 2000 RONITA TOW%MIMIN Ae6t,
Der Mr. Drilling,
'!Lank you for the opportunity to review your project Ott to determine if you need to obtain a
permit tzom Rice Creek Watershed District.
I have completed an in -o$ioe review of tbs project site and have detemined that there are no
wetlands on Nee, the site is trot within 1000 feet of a DNR Protected Water or 300 feet oft ditch
and the site is leas than 2.3 um. Our Lospeetor had a conversation with Jim Marsh of the Ctry
of Centerville and determined that the site is not within a Rood plain.
Bemuse the project site deft not meet any of the RCWD's criteria for a permit you will at be
required to apply lbrapermit.
Sincerely,
1)2sa
Michele D. l
Environmental Education & Pattie Coordinator
c:conespoadence
Le nen :kw
1 fir`
•
K
A3. CARDINAL SR. 'YARD Of MM4AGaK
Axoca coupes , ommy � vmsm yin mom ' OKOreN t, aaAATNaN fuC, IFtlRStk+ causer • m ..pa�•egwp�•
MOMie wYae wiNlO,a tsrbp64rt� tpMipt • e
.w aq•p„e eMfAptl 9 wNrUY �� l I eMCKYJ L tAKw•Ip+ww+A
MEMO
DATE : September 8, 2000
TO : Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM: Jim March
RE : 2001 Budget, Resolution 00 -18 — tax rate increase,
Resolution 00 -19 — certifying initial tax rate
Included in your packet is Resolution #00 -18. This is in regards to a relatively new law
that requires that this type of resolution be adopted if the City is considering a tax rate
increase. Even though we are contemplating keeping our tax rate at the same level, we
will need to adopt this resolution and file the resolution with Anoka County. Council
adopted a similar resolution last year.
Resolution #00 -19 needs to be adopted so that we can certify our proposed initial levy to
Anoka County. This proposed levy would keep our tax rate at the same level. Council
will have the ability to decrease this levy prior to final levy certification, but will not be
able to increase this levy amount.
A copy of the latest revised proposed budget will be distributed at the Council meeting.
n V e / V itVc 1880 Main Street • Centerville, MN 55038
d e 8
Established 1857 (651) 429 -3232 • Fa, (651) 429 -8629
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
RESOLUTION 00 - 18
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TAX RATE INCREASE
WHEREAS, The State of Minnesota has enacted Chapter 243, Laws of Minnesota 1999,
Article 6, Section 2 requiring municipal governments to have adopted and filed an
authorizing resolution if its municipality tax rate turns out to be higher the following year
than a theoretical tax rate for the previous year under the law; and
WHEREAS, there are numerous factors that are beyond control, the City of Centerville
may need to have a higher tax rate for the following year, and if the tax rate has to go up,
the City of Centerville wishes to be in compliance with the law with an authorizing
resolution being filed with Anoka County; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that if the tax rate of the City of Centerville
for the year 2001 is higher than the tax rate certified by the City of Centerville under
clause (3) of Section 2, Article 6, Chapter 243, Laws of Minnesota 1999, the higher tax
rate is hereby authorized by the City of Centerville City Council.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that an official copy of this adopted resolution be filed
with the Anoka County Auditor, who for purposes of this law in Anoka County is the
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this 13 day of
September, 2000.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Jim March, City Administrator
.r,
� rc entervit(e
1880 Main Street • Centerville, MN 55038
Established 1857 (651) 429 -3232 • Fax (65 1) 429 -8629
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
RESOLUTION 00 - 18
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TAX RATE INCREASE
WHEREAS, The State of Minnesota has enacted Chapter 243, Laws of Minnesota 1999,
Article 6, Section 2 requiring municipal governments to have adopted and filed an
authorizing resolution if its municipality tax rate turns out to be higher the following year
than a theoretical tax rate for the previous year under the law; and
WHEREAS, there are numerous factors that are beyond control, the City of Centerville
may need to have a higher tax rate for the following vear. and if the tax rate has to ao un.
the City of Centerville wishes to be in compliance with the law with an authorizing
resolution being filed with Anoka County; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that if the tax rate of the City of Centerville
for the year 2001 is higher than the tax rate certified by the City of Centerville under
clause (3) of Section 2, Article 6, Chapter 243, Laws of Minnesota 1999, the higher tax
rate is hereby authorized by the City of Centerville City Council.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that an official copy of this adopted resolution be filed
with the Anoka County Auditor, who for purposes of this law in Anoka County is the
Division Manager of Property Records and Taxation.
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this 13 day of
September, 2000.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Jim March, City Administrator
' C termite IT
1880 Main Street • Centerville, MN 55038
F stabt`ished 1857 (651) 429 -3232 • Fa 2( (651) 429-8629
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
RESOLUTION 00 - 19
RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2000 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 2001
BE IT RESOLVED, by City Council of the City of Centerville, Anoka County, State of
Minnesota, that the following sums of money are levied for the current year, collectible in
2001, upon taxable property in the City of Centerville, for the following purposes:
Total Levy
General Fund: $1,210,000.00
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a
certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor, who for purposes of this law in
Anoka County is the Division Manager of Property Records and Taxation.
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this 13` day of
September, 2000.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Jim March, City Administrator
CITY OF CENTERVILLE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION &
CITY COUNCIL JOINT WORKSHOP
July 19, 2000
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission and Council of
the City of Centerville held a joint workshop at City Hall, 1880 Main Street.
ROLL CALL
COUNCIL PRESENT: Council Member Terry Sweeney
Council Member Linda Broussard Vickers
PLANNING & ZONING
PRESENT: Commission Member Ray DeVine
Commission Member Barry Brainard
Commission Member Al LaMotte
COUNCIL ABSENT: Council Member Tom Wilharber
Council Member Dick Travis
Council Member Mari Nelson
PLANNING & ZONING
ABSENT: Commission Member Rob Sheppard
Commission Member John McLean
Commission Member David Kilian
Commission Member Brian Hanson
Staff members present: City Administrator Jim March
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CALL TO ORDER
the meeting was called to order at 6:32 p.m.
NEW BUSINESS
None.
OLD BUSINESS
ORDINANCE # 4
Page ! of 2
Council Member Sweeney stated that he had spoken with Mr. Todd Gardner, 1817 Fox Run,
who requested that Council Member Sweeney relay his opposition to recreation vehicle
restrictions contained in the ordinance. Mr. Joe Steele, 6926 Sumac Court, was present and
concurred with Mr. Gardner's opposition and stated that his children use the vehicles and it
occupies their time. Mr. & Mrs. Doug Frederickson, 7055 Eagle Trail, were present and also
concurred with the opposition previously stated and reiterated that they would move out of
Centerville if need be. Council Member Sweeney stated that he has spoken with all firefighters
and they are against any additional restrictions. Ms. Vickers spoke about Council and Planning
and Zoning's efforts to reach compromises with the proposed draft. Steve Whittet, 7162 Brian
Way, stated that he owns a motor home that is 32' and did not want to see additional
restrictions.
Several members of the audience wanted to see the length of recreational vehicles be increased
to 35' versus 28'.
Greg Owens, County Bank, presented members with a proposed sign for County Bank and
stated that the sign would include such items as weather, time, etc. Mr. Owens stated that he
felt sign restrictions should be different for commercial sites abutting county roads. Mr. Owens
stated that he would forward other communities' commercial sign restrictions to Planning and
Zoning.
Council Member Sweeney stated that residents could bring forward a formal petition for any
item contained in the new ordinance.
DISCUSSION ITEM (S)
None.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Committee Member DeVine, seconded by Member Brainerd to adjourn the Planning
and Zoning/Council joint workshop of July 19, 2000. All in favor. Motion Carried
Unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned.
Transcribed by Teresa Bender, City Staff
I I
Page 2 of 2
r
CITY OF CENTERVILLE Complaint Number
COMMUNITY ACTION NOTICE 34
PART I. BACKGROUND Date Complaint Taken
9/5/00
COMPLAINANT Time 11:00 AM
Last Name Wilharber First Name LThomas I BY:
Address 6849 (Centerville Road
Phone # - work I Phone # - home 429 -2140
COMPLAINT INFORMATION
ADDRESS: 0 L
NAME (IF KNOWN): Phone
Last First
Junk Vehicle ❑ Weeds ❑ Animal Q Noise U Other LL,
Explain
Construction firm placing sewer and water services at Hunter's Crossing sub- division. Heavy equipment backed into corn
field approx. 75' destroying crop in that area. Mr. Wilharber believes that the sewer line or portion thereof is located on
his property.
,90 A 7e - ot
What type of Response is Required: Immediate [ J Time Permits L7 Complaintant Informed L
Complainant Response Required ❑ RESPONSE METHOD: L
Department Referred to: Bonestroo (Department) Dan (Employee)
PART II. FOLLOW UP:
Action Taken Fax sent to Bonestroo and notified Jim March of complaint. Mr. Wilharber will present pictures to council.
Completed U Date of Action
Person Contacting Complainant: Department:
Additional Information
10.36 -ail
CITY OFCENTERVILLE Complaint Number
COMMUNITY ACTION NOTICE 1 3 71
PART I. BACKGROUND Date Complaint Taken
9[6/OO
COMPLAINANT Time r 12:20 PM1
Last Name Ken First Name Vanderbeek BY:
Address 68921 Centerville Road
Phone # - work 5 1 Phone # - home 1
COMPLAINT INFORMATION
ADDRESS: Ob j
NAME (IF KNOWN): Phone
Last First
Junk Vehicle Weeds U Animal E Noise r Other C
Explain
Construction workers at Hunter's Crossing cut telephone line today. Line was drapped over power lines and laying in
'front yard. While telephone company was out to property they reported that if someone used the phone there was a
possibility of electricution. Spouse does daycare out of the home, telephone company advised that all children /adults
stay away from wire due to possibility of stray voltage. Mr. Vanderbeek stated that this is the fourth time they have cut
the phone line. Mr. Vanderbeek also stated that the construction workers did not notify of the cut today.
What type of Response is Required: Immediate L✓ Time Permits L 1 Complaintant Informed Li
Complainant Response Required RESPONSE METHOD: Telephone
Department Referred to: Bonestroo (Department) Dan S. (Employee)
PART II. FOLLOW UP:
Action Taken j
Completed E. Date of Action
Person Contacting Complainant: Department:
Additional Information