Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-10-11 Packet CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2000 6:00 p.m. (/I CALL TO ORDER GI. Roll Call /III. SET AGENDA II. PUBLIC HEARING (S) County Bank Variance Request Hasiak Variance Request / Salazar Variance Request t.. Northern Forest Products — 5 year Tax Abatement vfV. APPEARANCES /AWARDS V( CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES / September 27, 2000 Meeting Minutes WI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS 11/ � The City of Centerville September 28, through October 4, 2000 Centennial Fire District Expenses Pay Estimate #2 — Hunter's Crossing II. P ITIONS AND CON � / uGyw la 8 /a I ., co P �. / VVV III. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (,2: Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement -Trio Inn (Tabled from Sept. 27 Meeting) — Legal Counsel Report NE) il BUSINESS / County Bank Variance Request Hasiak Variance Request Salazar Variance Request al ii Resolution #00 -23 Abatement of Special Assessments (6973 Meadow / Circle) 0 5. Resolution #00 -24 Building Quality Communities D Trail avin at Acorn Creek Park P g Centerville Redi -Mix — Interim Special Use Permit (Renewal Request) 8 Ground Development NFI /- as -? o -r..s; i u WIC . CONSENT AGENDA . COMMITTEE REPORTS D � L{0 w 5 S l i d XII. ADMINISTRATO�� REPORT „Y � � i �jl �r,ce�k Pio fw}y - A ,,» ; s. l J { '►/ �v L XIII. ADJOURNMENT / / lM� CITY OF CENTER'VILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 27, 2000 6:00 p.m. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held thei egularly scheduled meeting on September 27, 2000, at City Hall, 1880 Main Si A . PRESENT: Mayor Tom Wilharber Council Member Dick Travis Council Member Terry Sweeney Council Member Linda Broussard Vic. e Council Member Mari Nelson ABSENT: None STAFF: City Administrator, Ji A% clt City Attorney, James I i City Engineer, To " e ,.. 0 L . r t, : ■ - N L CALL TO ORDE Mayor W" •er c Alt d li - -1e1rb a'7, '00 4" Oil Ti1rIIeeting to order at 6:12 . II. t :`� *11A L � 16111ewr, _ ite ,a r -YLde -to a n s . tsr 1 it! ber al d `• der ' nfims a Bu iness a letter from Alexanda House, eri om Anon: { (Linty Gomm in Development, and a letter from the pit eso a louse o re 'yes. o + oRb il e seconded by Council Member Travis tO ' ' rove The a . end"a with the noted additions. All in favor. Motion carried 'T Altus . IP III 1 i C H EARING (S) si of - ' ter Assessment Hearing IN a • Wilharber opened the public hearing at 6:13 p.m. : vtr. Peterson explained to Council all improvements are in place within the < development with the exception of the streets and curbs. The paving of streets is Page 1 of 12 scheduled for next week. Mr. Peterson explained how the City arrived at the assessments figures. Mr. Peterson stated that the total costs for Hunter's Crossing improvements are $653,613. The developer has paid for half of the costs to extend services down Centerville Road. The remaining half has been divided among individual property owners who also benefited. Kenneth Vanderbeek, 6892 Centerville Road, explained to Council numerous problems he has endured during construction. He lost telephone and cable services on four (4) occasions. At one point the telephone line was dropped onto the power line creating a potentially dangerous situation if his wife or children would have used the telephone. His tractor was damaged, requiring $150 in repairs. The City also removed trees on his property without permission and without an easement to do so. He mentioned to Council that he was aware services were coming but disagrees with treating his lot as two (2) lots and therefore assessing him for same. Mr. Vanderbeek explained due to the elevation of the lot he believes the lot is non - buildable. Mr. Vanderbeek stated that it would be cost prohibitive for him to make the property saleable, and he did not intend on doing so and would not divide or split the property. Larry Woiak, 6925 Centerville Road, stated he intends on contesting the assessment believing that the cost is in excess of the increased property value the services will bring. Dale Greenwadt, 4697 - 316 Lane, Stacy, Minnesota, stated that the property he owns on Centerville Road is rental property and his renters did not provide the notice of assessments to him. He was unaware of the assessment in time to submit his petition to contest the assessment. Mayor Wilharber questioned Attorney Hoeft that due to Greenwadt's circumstances, could Mr. Greenwadt still be allowed to file a petition against the assessment. City Attorney Hoeft indicated Mr. Greenwadt would be allowed to file a petition. Council Member Sweeney asked whether the City had agreed to replace the trees. Mr. Vanderbeek said they had. Council Member Sweeney then asked if the trees were in the City right -of -way. Mr. Vanderbeek stated they were not. Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned Mr. Peterson if it is standard procedure to assess someone for two (2) stubs if the lot could potentially be divided. Mr. Peterson confirmed. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if the stub could be removed if that was the wish of the property owner. Mr. Peterson confirmed. Page 2of12 Mr. Woiak stated that the assessments are in excess of replacing the existing well. Mr. Greenwadt stated he believed the price to replace an existing well be approximately $4,000. Mr. Woiak stated that his well is only 12 years old and he believes it will be a long time before it fails. Council Member Broussard Vickers explained to the property owners that they are paying up front for their next service when their wells fail. She told them that wells do fail quite regularly and the cost to replace a well would exceed what they have been assessed for services. She stated she did not like the original numbers and feels the Council has shifted as much of the financial burden onto the developer as possible. She then explained to the property owners that the City can assess them if the property owner has a realized value, and she believes they will realize a value when connecting to these services. Council Member Nelson inquired if the assessment amount was divided among the property owners by adding up the total number of feet of pipe for the development and Centerville Road. Mr. Peterson explained the property owners are being assessed for half of the cost to extend services on Centerville Road only. Mr. Woiak told the City he has incurred numerous costs to clear the sewer pipe at his residence and will submit a bill to the City to be reimbursed for the same as he feels it is their responsibility. Mr. Vanderbeek inquired if he would have to connect to the services as soon as they become available. Mr. Peterson stated he would need to connect to sewer service within a year of becoming available. Council Member Broussard Vickers inquired when the services would be available. Mr. Peterson told her January 1, 2001. Mr. Peterson stated the amounts being assessed are in keeping with standard assessments for similar services in other communities. Mayor Wilharber inquired as to why Mr. Woiak's services were previously placed into the lot at an angle. Mr. Peterson explained that previous piping was temporary until services were extended on Centerville Road. Mayor Wilharber noted the previous owner of Mr. Woiak's property was hooked up to City sewer for free because no one at City Hall knew the property was hooked to the City's sewer system. A question was raised by several property owners as to why property owners with homes backing up to Centerville Road were not assessed. Mr. Peterson explained only those properties with homes facing Centerville Road were assessed. The residents whose homes back up to Centerville Road will be assessed when services come down the street their homes face. Page 3 of 12 Mr. March provided paper to the property owners who had stated they wished to oppose the assessment. The property owners in opposition placed their names and addresses on the paper and turned them in to Mr. March. Mayor Wilharber closed the public hearing at 6:55 p.m. Mayor Wilharber stated he understands the property owners' position as he will be in their position in several years when services reach him. Council Member Travis indicated that he recently has been assessed for services, is fully aware of their costs and believes them to be fair and reasonable. Council Member Sweeney indicated the assessment is less costly than replacing an existing well and the developer has bore a larger portion of the costs to bring services down Centerville Road. Council Member Sweeney also stated that property owners in question would benefit from the services and concurred that the assessments were fair and reasonable. Council Member Broussard Vickers addressed the issue of Mr. Vanderbeek being assessed for two (2) stubs at his property. She indicated the price for one (1) acre lots is approximately $60,000 and believes the property's value could and would be enhanced to be buildable. Ms. Broussard Vickers stated that in her opinion, having the stub run to the property during this time would be less expensive than having it run in the future. Ms. Broussard Vickers concurred that the assessments were fair and reasonable. Council Member Nelson told the Council she usually leans toward individuals with her opinions rather than toward the developers; however, in this case she believes the developer has been more than fair and concurred with the other members of Council. Mayor Wilharber stated that assessments are high due to the cost of labor and supplies and that these same costs will continue to increase. Mayor Wilharber concurred with the other members of Council. Mr. Vanderbeek stated he had received an estimate for costs to connect to the City's sewer system in the amount of $10,000. Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned whether Mr. Vanderbeek wished installation of the second stub. Mr. Vanderbeek declined. Mr. Vanderbeek stated he could not afford the $10,000 assessment and questioned the option of deferring connection for several years. City Attorney Hoeft stated that deferral of special assessments is an option; however, the City would prefer to discuss this issue as the assessment process continues. Page 4 of 12 City Attorney Hoeft advised the Council to approve the resolution as presented. He indicated modifications may be included as part of settlement discussions in the future. Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Broussard Vickers to approve Resolution 00 -21. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. IV. APPEARANCES /AWARDS Mr. Bruce Malec, Division Manager — Waste Management Mr. Bruce Malec introduced Mr. Gary Boium to the Council as Waste Management's new Municipal Marketing Manager. Mr. Malec stated that Mr. Boium would make periodic visits to ensure that quality services are being provided to the community. Mr. Malec questioned whether Council had any issues of concern relating to the haulers service and Council reiterated that they are pleased with the services they and residents are receiving. Mr. Malec thanked the Council for the compliments Waste Management received and for the opportunity to service the community. Mayor Wilharber thanked Mr. Malec for attending. A consensus was reached to hear the Northern Forest Products Abatement from Unfinished Business at this point in the meeting. Northern Forest Products Abatement Paul McDowell, Northern Forest Products, addressed the Council and outlined plans for the expansion of his business. Mr. McDowell presented Council with sketches of a proposed expansion plan for the current Northern Forest Products facility. Mr. McDowell stated that they have out grown their current facility and expansion would provide a more productive /efficient facility. Mr. McDowell also indicated that Northern Forest Products has an additional site outside of Centerville and expansion of the current facility would allow combining of the two facilities. Mr. McDowell stated that the proposed expansion would be 22,000 or 23,000 square feet and cost approximately $600,000 or $700,000. Mayor Wilharber inquired if the detention pond would be able to handle the runoff from the expansion area. Mr. McDowell said he would rely on the recommendation of the City Engineer. Page 5 of 12 Council Member Broussard Vickers inquired how far from the back of Mr. McDowell's lot the building would be positioned. Mr. McDowell said he believed it was approximately 70 or 80 feet from the property line. Mr. March noted the public hearing on the five -year tax abatement is scheduled for October 11, 2000. Mayor Wilharber inquired as to how many employees Mr. McDowell planned to add with the expansion. Mr. McDowell stated five (5) or six (6) within the next five (5) years, depending on business. Mayor Wilharber questioned the amount of off site business being combined in the expanded facility. Mr. McDowell stated approximately seventy (70) percent of the business would be combined and the other portion would remain at that site due to rail transportation conveniences. V. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES The following changes were requested by Council: Page 2, fourth paragraph change "Ramsey County" to "Anoka County", Page 22 change "QUAD meeting" to "QUAD Community Press ", Page 20, eighth paragraph beginning with "Mr. Palzer indicated" change the paragraph to read: "Mr. Palzer indicated there would be new regulations forthcoming regarding lots of one (1) acre or more and Council wanted to comply with the upcoming regulations." Also in the same paragraph change "Rice Creek" to "MPCA ". Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis to approve the September 13, 2000, City Council Meeting Minutes with the noted changes. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS The City of Centerville September 14, through September 27, 2000 City Attorney Hoeft discussed a pending case before the Minnesota Supreme Court he is arguing and has been preparing for. The case is a DUI case in which the drivers vehicle was forfeited and storage costs were incurred. The person whose vehicle was impounded is attempting to get the City to pay the storage costs of $6,000. City Attorney Hoeft noted that his most recent billings included additional time due to these circumstances. Page 6 of 12 Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Broussard Vickers to approve the expenditures for the City from September 14, 2000 through September 27, 2000. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Centennial Fire District Expenses Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Broussard Vickers to approve the Centennial Fire District expenditures in the amount of $5,583.75. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 20 Avenue Water /Sewer Final Pay Estimate Mr. Peterson indicated the project has been completed since 1998 and the City has been withholding payment from Bonine Excavating, Inc., until several issues were resolved. Mr. Peterson stated that Ms. Nancy Bonine recently contacted him and indicated willingness to waive payment of $14,969.14 that was at issue and requested payment of the $21,288.78. Mr. Peterson recommended payment of $21,288.78. Mayor Wilharber inquired to whom the check should be made payable to. Mr. March indicated he is waiting for instruction from City Attorney Hoeft. City Attorney Hoeft noted that the City has received two (2) separate Notices of Levy's against monies owed to Bonine Excavating and the two agencies will be receiving the money in lieu of Bonine. Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis to approve payment of $21,288.78 as the seventh (7) and final payment on the 20 Avenue water /sewer utility im rovements. • vor._ lylotiopt carried unanimously. c a■ ( Qe , •a. U y VII. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS Council Member Nelson inquired as to the status of the Salazar's dogs, Nikita and Dakota. Council Member Nelson stated that she has driven past the Salazar's house and noted the pen was not in compliance with Council requirements. Mr. March reported to Council the Salazars began construction of a fence impeding the street right -of -way by one (1) foot without applying for a variance, and the City placed a stop work order on the site. Subsequent to numerous telephone conversation with Mr. Salazar, Mr. Salazar has assured Mr. March that he will keep the dogs in the house excluding relief periods. Mr. March stated that he attempted to mail a certified letter to the Salazars in regards to non - compliance of the dog kennel; however, it was not picked up at the post office. Mr. March stated he had a Centennial Lakes Police Officer serve the letter on a juvenile at Page 7 of 12 the residence. The Community Service Officer returned the next day and picked up the signed card acknowledging receipt of the letter. Mr. March explained to Council the letter informed the Salazars of the requirements of Council in regards to the kennel, and also noted the procedures for applying for a variance to continue construction of the fence. Council Member Nelson questioned Mr. March if the police could patrol, and if they were to notice the dogs out side of the kennel, could the dogs be seized and further action taken. Mr. March referred the question to City Attorney Hoeft. City Attorney Hoeft indicated it would need to be determined if the Salazars were in violation of the requirements prior to action being taken. Mr. Hoeft stated there is no reason why the Centennial Lakes Police Department (CLPD) could not be asked to keep an eye on the dogs. Council Member Nelson stated she would like to make the CLPD aware of the situation and ask them to routinely check the property. Mayor Wilharber, as police liaison, stated he would contact CLPD and forward the request. VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Storm Sewer Re- alignment — Lloyd Drilling (1873 Main Street) Mr. Peterson recommended that the east half of the site drain east towards Shad Avenue. The runoff can be collected in a storm sewer catch basin at Shad Avenue and Main Street, flow east in the ditch, then flow south under the highway to an existing pond at the southeast corner of Main Street and the Fire Station driveway. The water will be treated prior to continuing southward to Clearwater Creek. The west half of the site will receive adequate treatment on -site in the existing highway ditch and the grassy area around the "beehive" catch basin at the north property line. Mr. Peterson stated it is not necessary to redirect the storm water flowing in the existing pipe south under the highway and into the small pond south of the City Hall parking lot. Council noted there has been a water problem on Shad Avenue in the past and requested that Mr. Peterson check with Dave Lutz on Shad Avenue to make sure redirecting the sewer in this manner will not cause further water problems for the residents on Shad Avenue. Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis, to approve the Storm Sewer Realignment at 1873 Main St. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Letter from Frank Ball, Director, Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division, Minnesota Department of Public Safety. Page 8 of 12 Mr. March reviewed with Council the letter received from the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division and requested direction from the Council as to how the City should respond. Council Member Sweeney inquired if this was the first known violation for the Trio Inn and, if so, what the business has done to ensure the violation will not occur again. Council Member Sweeney stated that in his opinion, if this incident is the first violation he would prefer not to fine the business. City Attorney Hoeft told the Council they were under no obligation, based on the letter, to impose a civil penalty. He indicated the letter should not be perceived as a threat to impose a penalty but noted the State of Minnesota does have the authority to impose a fine whether the City chooses to or not. Council Member Sweeney stated he would rather impose a nominal fine and not pull the business' license than have the State impose a higher fine and revoke the business' license. Council Member Broussard Vickers inquired as to how someone can be fined for being charged with an offense, but found not guilty. Attorney Hoeft explained the law does allow for civil penalty when you are charged with an offense. He used the example of when someone is arrested for DUI they are charged with an offense and lose their civil driving privilege. In some cases they are found not guilty but they have still lost their driving privilege. Mayor Wilharber noted the Council had waited until the matter was resolved in the courts and ruled that because the bartender was found not guilty they would not impose a fine. City Attorney Hoeft explained the State response recognizes there is a difference between being found not guilty of the offense and being innocent of noncompliance with the law. Mayor Wilharber indicated he would prefer the City impose a penalty rather than the State. Council Member Nelson stated she did not like the tone of the letter and expressed a desire to revisit the idea of fining the business. She indicated she felt that in light of the fact the business owner is not denying the violation, she feels there should have been a penalty imposed. Mayor Wilharber clarified the owner of the bar was not at the establishment when the violation occurred and the bartender was the one charged with the offense. City Attorney Hoeft said it may be possible to impose a nominal fine on the business to pre -empt action by the State. City Attorney Hoeft offered to research M.S. Chapter 340A.415 and bring a definitive answer to the Council at the next meeting. Page 9 of 12 Council Member Broussard Vickers noted her dislike of the tone of the letter. She stated if the consensus of the Council was not to fine the business she proposes a letter be drafted to the State in response outlining the fact that the City has chosen not to impose a penalty and give the reasons the Council choose to decline. Motion by Council Member Travis, seconded by Council Member Sweeney to table the drafting of a response to the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division to the October 11, 2000 Council Meeting to allow time for City Attorney Hoeft to review M.S. Chapter 340A.415. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Letter from Alexandra House Mayor Wilharber read a letter from Alexandra House requesting the Council declare the month of October Domestic Violence Awareness Month. Motion by Council Member Travis, seconded by Council Member Sweeney to declare October Domestic Violence Awareness Month. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Letter from Anoka County Community Development Mayor Wilharber read a letter from Anoka County Community Development proposing modifying the way Community Development Block Grant funds (CDBG) are distributed throughout the County. Mr. March explained to Council he had attended a meeting regarding the matter and said under the proposed modifications, Centerville will compete with cities of comparable size for CDBG funds. Letter from Minnesota House of Representatives Mayor Wilharber read a letter received from the Minnesota House of Representatives regarding a series of town meetings scheduled to discuss proposed modifications to, and the effectiveness of the Metropolitan Council. IX. NEW BUSINESS St. Genevieve's Land Inquiry Letter The Council discussed a letter drafted by Mr. March to St. Genevieve's Catholic Church requesting church officials meet with City officials to discuss plans for future redevelopment. Page 10 of 12 • Mayor Wilharber requested that a notation be included that he had spoken with Father Fitzgerald in regards to this matter in the past. Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Nelson to approve sending the letter with the noted addition to St. Genevieve's Catholic Church. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. X. CONSENT AGENDA XL COMMITTEE REPORTS Mayor Wilharber reported he was unable to attend the Police Commission meeting but had visited with the Chief of Police and will prepare a written report for Council. XII. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Mr. March reported he received a letter from Mr. Sheehy who is interested in donating 15 acres of land to the City. There are special assessments pending on the property in the amount of $74,792 and Mr. Sheehy has agreed to pay 25% of the assessments. Mr. March told Council he visually surveyed the site and feels it is a beautiful nature area for a possible park or trail. The site also has potential for a water tower which would be visible from I35. Mr. March stated that soil borings could be done if Council desired. Mayor Wilharber stated he would like to proceed as there are multiple ways the City could use the property. Council Member Travis inquired as to whether there was a wetland delineation. Mr. March told him Anoka County has declared it a wetland. The consensus was to research the donation further. Motion by Council Member Nelson, seconded by Council Member Broussard Vickers to accept the donation of land from Mr. Sheehy. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. March reported there is a "Meet the Candidates" program scheduled to be taped for the cable access channel. Mr. March stated that he has requested a copy 4 of same specific to Centerville. to rws.�u�` „ca.-0 Council Member Sweeney requested anyone not receiving cable to contact him so he could bring it to the attention of AT & T Broadband. Mayor Wilharber reported that on several occasions he has discussed possible trail connections with the City of Hugo. Mayor Wilharber stated that if water Page 11 of 12 services and trail connections were made with neighboring conununities, (i.e., Hugo and Lino Lakes) it would be cost - effective. XIII. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Broussard Vickers to adjourn the September 27, 2000 City Council Meeting at 8:33p.m. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed by: Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Page 12 of 12 MEMO DATE : October 6, 2000 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM : Jim March RE : Variance Public Hearings Variances - The public hearings for all three of these variance requests were continued to the Council meeting due to the need to have enough published notice for the meetings. Below is a synopsis of each variance request along with the recommendations from the Planning and Zoning Commission. 1. County Hank - The County Bank is requesting a variance for their proposed sign to be located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Main Street and 21 a Avenue. Craig Bode (Branch Manager) and Dave Shannon (Color Sign) are expected to be in attendance. The variance request is for a larger and taller sign than ordinance currently allows. There is a new schematic for the sign that is enclosed with this memo. The revised schematic shows a two -foot taller sign than they had originally proposed along with an instant cash sign below the main sign. The proposed sign will be approximately 26.58 feet tall and 211 square feet in size. Ordinance allows a maximum height of 20 feet and 80 square feet in size for a free standing sign in a commercial area. The variance request is also for a time and temperature reader board, which is currently not allowed by ordinance. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that this variance request be denied. They felt that the Ordinance needs to be amended to possibly allow this type of sign and also mentioned that they may create a special sign district for the commercial property east of 20 on both sides of Main Street to allow those businesses to have similar signs that Lino Lakes allows. No citizens were in attendance to comment on this item 2. Hasaik Shed - Mr. and Mrs. Stan Hasaik (6994 Centerville Road) are requesting a variance to enlarge the existing pole barn structure that currently exists on the property. Two percent of the existing lot is approximately 621 square feet. The existing shed already greatly exceeds this amount. The existing building is at least 30x40, if not larger. Mr. Hasaik started to add a lean-to addition to the north side of the pole barn of approximately S'x24'. Mr. Hasaik would like to use the proposed addition for more storage. The building official issued a stop work order on the project and has also issued an order to remove the interior improvements that have begun in the pole barn without a building permit. Committee member John McLean announced a potential conflict of interest in regards to this item since he lives across the street. The Planning Commission motioned to recommend granting a variance for the interior improvements, but indicated that the work would have to be inspected and a building permit issued for the work.. The motion also included to deny a variance for the pole barn addition. One resident mentioned that he thought the pole barn was an eyesore for the neighborhood. 3. Salazar Fence - Mr. and Mrs. Pedro Salazar are requesting a variance to be able to construct a six (6) foot wooden privacy fence in their rear yard. The property is a corner lot located at 7336 Old Mill Road. According to Ordinance they have two front yards. They would like a variance to leave the north side of the fence facing Mill Road located where they have already dug the fence post - holes. These holes are approximately one (1) foot into the road right of way. The Salazar's have submitted letters from their two adjoining neighbors indicating that they do not have a problem with the proposed fence or its proposed location. The Planning Commission had amended Ordinance #4 to delineate that a corner lot's front yard was the side of the lot that had a street address or the side of the lot that had the narrowest street width. Another conflicting definition in the Ordinance was not removed stating that two front yards have to be maintained for a corner lot. By definition, the most restrictive requirement must be enforced. The Planning Commission plans to amend the Ordinance to remove the two front yard requirements for fences on corner lots. The Planning Commission voted on the variance request. The vote ended up tied three to three with one abstention. One member that voted against the motion is in favor of allowing the fence, but felt that the fence should be allowed to stay in the right of way. The three voting for the motion wanted to grant the variance for the fence, but were not interested in allowing the fence to remain in the street right -of -way. Effective 9/5/00 City of Centerville Ord. #4 Travel Trailers - A mobile vehicle with wheels, designed for ovemight living or camping purposes, capable of being towed by a motor vehicle. Use, Permitted - A use that is permitted in the district under which it is listed. Usable Open Space - A ground area on a lot, which is graded, developed, landscaped or equipped or intended and maintained for recreation or leisure, available to and useable by persons occupying a dwelling unit and their guests. Variance - The waiving by Board action of the literal provisions of the Zoning Ordinance in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Vehicle - Any vehicle which is self - propelled or designed to be pushed or pulled and shall include, but not be limited to, automobile, busses, motorbikes, motorcycles, motor scooters, trucks, tractors, go -carts, golf carts, campers, trailers, boats, planes and gliders. Vehicle Abandoned - Any vehicle as defined in this section, which does not have lawfully affixed or attached thereto an un- expired state registration or license plate or plates, or the condition of which is wrecked, dismantled, partially dismantled, inoperative, abandoned or discarded. Water - Oriented Accessory Structure or Facility - A small above ground building or other improvement except stairways, fences, docks, and retaining walls, which, because of the relationship of its use to a surface water feature, reasonably needs to be located closer to public waters than the normal structure setback. Examples of such structures and facilities include boathouses, gazebos, screen houses, fish houses, pump houses, and detached decks. Wetland - Lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water table is usually at or near the surface or the land or is covered by shallow water. For purposes of this definition, wetlands must have the following three characteristics: A. Predominance of hydric soils; and B. Are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support a prevalence of hydrophytic vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions; and C. Under normal circumstances support a prevalence of such vegetation. Yard - A required open space on a lot which is unoccupied and unobstructed from the ground upward, except as otherwise provided for herein. The measurement of a yard shall be construed as the minimum horizontal distance between the lot line and the building line. Page 13 of 62 Effective 9/5/00 City of Centerville Ord. #4 spaces and public and recreational facilities have been constructed and provided, he shall forward this information to the City Council, which may revoke the PUD Permit. Section 180 -270: Maintenance of Common Open Space. All land shown on the Final Development Plan as common open space must be conveyed to homeowners association or similar organization for the maintenance of the planned development. The common open space must be conveyed to the homeowners association or similar organization subject to covenants to be approved by the City Council which restrict the common open space to the uses specified on the final development plan, and which provide for the maintenance of the common open space in a manner which assures its continuing use for its intended purpose. Section 180 -280: Homeowners Association. If a homeowners association is created, the applicant shall submit plans at the time of final plan of development and documents which explain: A. Ownership and membership requirements; and B. Articles of incorporation and bylaws; and C. Time at which the developer turns the association over to the homeowners; and D. Approximate monthly or yearly association fee for homeowners; and E. Specific listing of items owned in common including such items as roads, recreation facilities, parking common open space ground, and utilities. Division 185: Variances Standards The Planning Com shall recommend a Variance and the Council shall order the issuance of such Variance only if it conforms to the following standards: A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and do not result from the actions of the petitioner; and B. Literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deppye the petitioner of nghts commonly; enjoyed by other properties ift the same district under the terms of this, Ordinance; and C.= . Granting the Variance requested will not confer on the applcant1ny special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other bride, structures, or buildings in the same district; and Page 55 of 62 Effective 9/5/00 City of Centerville Ord. #4 D. The proposed Variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the surrounding area, or in any other respect . impair the public health, safety, or welfare of the residents of the city; and E. Any person filing a petition requesting a variance or an amendment of the Zoning Ordinance rezoning property or changing regulations within any use district shall pay a fee according to the Schedule established by resolution of the City Council. The fee is payable at the time of filing a Petition and is not refundable. Section 185 - 010: Board of Appeals and Adjustments: The Planning and Zoning Commission shall act as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments and shall have the power to hear and recommend requests for the following: A. Interpretation::; Hearing where it is alleged that there is an error in a decision or judgment made by an Administrative Officer in the interpretation- or enforcement of this Ordinance or in the interpretation of Zoning District boundaries; and B. Variances: " = Recommend variances from '- literal ordinance requirements in instances where strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under construction. Section 185 - 020: Variance Procedures A. Applications provided by the City must be completed in writing prior to any consideration', of Variance Petitions. Fees for Variances are established by resolution of the City Council. B. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments may require the applicant to provide copies of plans, maps, surveys, etc., as deemed necessary, to ensure proper rgvi andconsideration of variance petitions. C. After fling an application, the City Clerk shall set a date for a public hearing. Notice, of the hearing shall be posted and published at least ten (10) days prior to the_date of the hearing, and notice shall be mailed to each_property owner within three hundred fifty (350) feet of the property to which the Variance relates. Defects in the •notice or fatfurejiii note ilndifilduaf shall; not validate the proceedmgs,N proved a good faith effort was made to comply`with these provisions. D. Upon the, hearing_requesf, the Board of Appeals and Adjustments Page 56 of 62 Effective 9/5/00 City of Centerville Ord. #4 shall either recommend approval or denial for the Variance and shall state the reasons for said action. Conditions for approval may be attached to any Variance granted. E. Upon receipt of the recommendations of the Commission, the Council shall hold whatever hearings it deems advisable and shall make its decision upon the request to grant the variance. In granting the Variance the Council may impose conditions which it considers necessary to meet the standards of this ordinance and to protect the best interests of the surrounding area and the city as a whole. Violation of any such condition is a violation of this Ordinance. The Board of Appeals and City Council must find true the following, in the granting of a Variance from this Ordinance: 1. Granting a Variance will not adversely affect the public health, welfare and safety and will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood; and 2. Strict interpretation or enforcement would result in a practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship, that is not self created, that is inconsistent with the intent of this Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; and 3. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property, use or facilities that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district; and 3. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property, use or facilities that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district; and 4. ;,Strict or literal interpretation would deprive the applicant of the use and enjoyment of his property in a manner similar t� others in the same district; and Page 57 of 62 Effective 915/00 City of Centerville Ord. #4 5. Granting of the variance will not allow a use which is otherwise not a permitted use in the Zoning District in question. F. A Variance granted but not used shall become void one (1) year after its effective date. G. No application for the same or essentially the same Variance shall be made within six (6) months of the date of denial. Section 185 - 030: Variance Appeal Procedures. A. Within thirty (30) days of the action of the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, the applicant or an affected property owner may file an appeal to the City Council to the decision of the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. The City Council shall seta date for a public hearing, within forty-five (45) days of receipt of the appeal, to consider granting or denying the variance request. B. The City Council shall have the power and duty of hearing and deciding appeals where it is alleged that there is an error in any order, requirement, decision or determination made by the administrative officer, enforcement officer, or by the Planning and Zoning Commission in the administration or enforcement of this Ordinance. C. Procedure. An appeal for Administrative Review may be taken to the Council by any person, firm or corporation or any city officer, department or agency affected by an adverse decision in the administration or enforcement of this Ordinance. Such an appeal shall be taken, by filing a Notice of Appeal specifying the grounds thereof with the Zoning Administrator, and the Council within thirty (30) days after the decision. If the Appeal is not taken by the owner of the property which is the subject matter of the decision appealed from, the Notice shall not be so filed until after it has been served upon such owner either in person or by mail. The Zoning Administrator shall forthwith transmit to the Council all papers constituting the record upon which the action appealed from was taken. An Appeal for an Administrative Review or a Variance stays all proceedings, including criminal proceedings in furtherance of the action appealed from unless the Zoning Administrator certifies to the Council that by reason of facts stated in the certificate a stay would, in his opinion, cause imminent peril to life or property. In that case the proceedings shall not be stayed otherwise than by a restraining. order granted by a court of competent jurisdiction.. The Council shall at its next regular meeting after the filing of an Appeal to it from a decision of the board set a date for hearing thereon, which shall be not later than sixty (60) days after Page 58 of 62 Effective 9/5/00 City of Centerville Ord. #4 the meeting. After hearing the oral or written views of all interested persons, the Council shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future meeting thereof. The decision of the council may be appealed to the County District Court. Division 190: Interim Uses Section 190 -010: Purpose. In addition to the purposes stated in Section 2 of this Ordinance, it is intended that the Interim Use Permit procedures allow flexibility in the use of land or structures in the City, when such uses are not permanent and when such uses meet appropriate conditions and performance standards that protect the public health, safety and welfare. Section 190 -020: Application, Public Hearing, and Procedure. The application, public hearing, notice and procedure requirements for Interim Use Permits shall be the same as those for Amendments, as provided in Section 7.03 of this Ordinance. If a proposed interim use is not listed as a permitted interim use in this Ordinance, a text amendment to this Ordinance will be required before an Interim Use Permit may be considered. Section 190 -030: Termination. All Interim Use Permits shall terminate on the happening of any of the following events, whichever first occurs: A. The date stated on the permit. B. Upon violation of the condition under which the permit was issued. C. Upon change in the City's zoning regulations that renders the use non - conforming. Section 190 -040: Standards. The Interim Use must be allowed in the Zoning District where the property is located. The Interim Use must meet or exceed the performance standards set forth in this Ordinance and other applicable City Ordinances. The interim use must comply with the specific standards for the use identified in this Ordinance, and must comply with all conditions of approval, which shall be included in an interim use permit agreement. Section 190 -050: Conditions. The City may attach conditions to approval of a permit to mitigate anticipated adverse impacts associated with the use, to ensure compliance with the standards of approval, to protect the value of other property, and to achieve the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Division 195: Amendments A. Amendments to this ordinance may be initiated by the Planning and Zoning Commission, City Council or by a petition of a landowner or other interested party. Page 59 of 62 e termite 1880 Main Street • Centerville, MN 55038 Established 1857 (651) 429 -3232 • .Tat (651) 429 -8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICE OF VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CENTERVILLE PLANNING & ZONING COMMITTEE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Centerville Planning and Zoning Committee will hold a public hearing and may take action on the following matter: ITEM: Variance PETITIONER: County Bank PROPERTY I.D. #: R24- 31 -22 -22 -0216 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT/UNIT, BLK/TRACT B REG LAND SURVEY NO 195 ADDRESS: 7111 — 21 Avenue North The petitioner requests the Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission consider granting a variance for the above - mentioned property. The variance is to allow a sign to be placed on the property exceeding signage requirements contained in Ordinance #4 regulating size, height and containing a message board. The said hearing will take place on Tuesday, October 3, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter. This public hearing will be continued to the Council Meeting on Wednesday, October 11, 2000 at Centerville City Hall in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter. The City Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assisted devices or a sign language interpreter must be received before 4:00 p.m. September 26, 2000. All persons interested are invited to attend and to be heard. You may contact the City Clerk's Office at (651) 429 -3232 or by facsimile (651) 492 -8629 if you need additional information. September 20, 2000 /s/ Teresa Bender Clerk/Treasurer abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz Published in the Quad Community Press September 26, and October 3, 2000 I I I / C 10 N I . 401 e t�1t + a" 1+ � , :.. 1 / It - ` hi ' .r ,, 8 . ' 4 - . 4 , 0 ; 1994 1994 if� ).- 95 r r e a 4 N 'Anx — l 3: u 4 0 < 53 1- I STREET e S M. 19M 11 1: 1 9 gl .g- 15 j ' , 4 ron 1 _ -- -- ,Z /A1 * -ROOIN i 1 .77 � . r�� 9l • • Mann < © - ? wo x1 co sik 142b,bda91 1 1 �. ROOIN IAN 11 iA C.. N n - W F I M a O vi Z R — 01111.09 9 GCrde+T, Q BANK ^ _ 0 pn 1979 1941 n .. _ — C.S.A.14. -40. 14- — I= Q a4o 1 194 1990 , r 1 1WO mro CO 1 $ 7030 > q W $ 1 1 1r S 1 Z •' w R a y I'. U. � e R w R t' ) R t X . N • I 1r • I N 4 / w Y 4 • J y it ale act F ee - + Y R°.µ • Y M. s tia „ s Z d { a • -' .. ., "'?' „ f t . t+ � ti .. „ ^�ss•". " :l,.i � ,r ( . � r i ,, . 9 h . < s � ! t ° S " , `i y •'x - - r i+",a Elk, ,.. i } '"«, x t Z d : s t . f 4°' ` ..s.-- `- L <' i J r '1 �/ 2 t , c q 2 i i '• 'S a 4 , - . ' " ,17 e-It -I �YG 4 ; 4, , �' : � uu �4 t' x -, ‘ 1Z; ' ,� t ti �' a i . .� : s.& as. ..ai��kf•.Ct.a� A 5 'ari �' f, k " '^ cL: igw x f r ° a 4. i ` 32 # v, 1 t GM at F L F ILL K f r '�•( " a 4 >� 3 0 . ] 1.:: :k' ,� yQ fi ? `- " :S i"'F'xx ° r �' -a T4 - 4`Y �P , Q Y TH CO UNTY BA NK ` . r e. " �� y , �. - " VIC MEO LEXAN FACE r Growing the future � - a ,, ,t bi Ni �- s l x . ... ... ... .. t 2 1 7Ey64 WIR® • �" r �. .. .. .. . .. .. MES SAGE C MI1T11 m .. .. .. . • .... • .... .. .. • .... . 70112 8 LAM n . .. iµ'i '4ati } f y zr BANKING MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS , F LAT L EX AN PACE h v r' k", 16"SQUAREMETALCOLLAR _ a ' j y Instant Cash ■ D O UR LE FACEINSTANTCASHSIGN 14" ROUND PIPE 14'C' ■ 10" SQU METAL COLLAR P.O. Box 124 • • • • • • • AlbeeMlle BM $5301 • COLOR SIGN SYSTEMS' INC e� 012197.1374 •�� Fu:812.487 SIGN NO NO./OF SCALE DATE i '. T- 7162.2 - 1 /1 _ mat DESIG CHECKED B 114E COUNTY_ BANK _ SHANNOIV_ ERIG(SO LOCATION LTJENT APPROVAL CU FNI' PO» .. .YOB. MN ___.___ A 13y fifil � e D t i pip !'" op _ 16 11203•41'411J —_ • 0 O 00. 00 OO ' 1 I ( • 1O e, 1 1 6 ,Va 1 a p ... O .o = 1 :0 o 4.0 . � 0 OL Z 061C W I I rSR18G IE+TFO) Q oR 1 - Q (116a9r $OG_PQMT) 1 .,1 O u W I 6 10 O 1 000 0 * o a I I 1 r•�YYi u� N r p �u m..0. tri. £ Q 01 0 o � n Ao 0 0- ty I g ita V \ ` I LIT 11 I 0 1 I I • , e' •6rxnn O _ _ . 7 _ . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . • 16006' N•2'Wet disrms ` -- 6rC1'96 DRIVE \ MAIN STREET (ANOKA COUNTY /ROUTE •14) a SIT=' AN• ANDSCA - TOTAL P.02 Effective 9/5/00 City of Centerville Ord. #4 Minnesota Statutes, serving six (6) or fewer persons, in a Single - Family Residential District and no more than sixteen (16) persons in a Multiple - Family Residential District. Right -of -Way - A street, alley or easement permanently established for the passage of persons and vehicles, including the traveled surface of lands adjacent that are formally dedicated to such usage. Semipublic Use - The use of land by a private, nonprofit organization to provide a public service that is ordinarily open to some persons outside the regular constituency of the organization. Setback - The minimum horizontal distance between a lot line and a building line or use. Sewer System - Pipelines or conduits, pumping stations, forcemain, and all other construction devices, appliances, or appurtenances used for conducting sewage or industrial waste or other wastes to a point of ultimate disposal. Shore Impact Zone - Land located between the ordinary high water level of a public water and a line parallel to it at a set back of fifty percent (50 %) of the structure setback. Sign - Any name identification, display illustration structure or device which is publicly displayed and which is used to direct attention to a product, person, business, institution or place. Significant Historic Site - Any archaeological site, standing structure, or other property that meets the criteria for eligibility to the National Register of Historic Places or is listed in the State Register of Historic Sites, or is determined to be an unplanted cemetery that falls under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 307.08. A historic site meets these criteria if it is presently listed on either register or if it is determined to meet the qualifications for listing after review by the Minnesota State Archaeologist or the Director of the Minnesota Historical Society. All unplatted cemeteries are automatically considered to be significant historic sites. Story - That portion of a building included between the surface of any floor and the surface of the next floor above it, or if there is no floor above it, then the space between the floor and the ceiling next above it. Story-Half - That portion of a building under a gable, hip or gambrel roof the wall plates of which, on at least two opposite exterior walls, are not more than two feet above the floor of such story. Steep Slope - Land where agricultural activity or development is either not recommended or described as poorly suited due to slope steepness and the site's soil characteristics, as mapped and described in available county soil surveys or other technical reports, unless appropriate design and construction techniques and farming practices are used in accordance with the provision of this ordinance. Where specific information is not Page 11 of 62 Effective 9/5/00 City of Centerville Ord. #4 Section 105 -020: Electric and Barbed Wire Fence. Electric fences, hog wire fencing, barbed wire fencing, and similar fencing will not be allowed except in the R -1 District. Section105 -030: Visual Obstructions. No fence may be erected which creates visual obstructions at any intersection, alley, driveway or street for safe vehicular, bicycle or pedestrian movement. Section 105 -040: Swimming Pool Fencing. No private swimming pool with a water depth exceeding twenty-four (24) inches may be allowed unless enclosed by a permanent wall or fence not less than six (6) feet in height with self - closing door and self - closing latch. Division 110: Sign Regulations Section 110 -010: General Provisions. A. Signs are prohibited within the public right-of-way easements except that the City Council may grant a Special Use Permit to locate signs and decorations on or within the right -of -way for a specified time. B. Flashing signs, motion signs or similar devices shall be prohibited in all districts, except approved traffic signal devices. C. Interior illuminated signs are permitted in ° all districts except Residential. All illuminated signs shall have a shielded light source. D. Business signs shall; not be painted,:: attached, . or in any manner affixed to trees, rocks or similar natural surfaces. No signs of any type shall be painted directly on to the roof or the sides of a building. E. Signs which interfere with the ability of vehicle operators or pedestrians to see traffic signals, or which impede the vision of traffic by vehicle operators or pedestrians are prohibited?. F. Wall signs must be mounted to the wall in a plane parallel to the wall and not perpendicular or projecting from: the wall. G. Signs shall not project above the roofline of any structure without the issuance of a , Special Use Permit. H: No sign shall physically obstruct any window, fire escape;` or opening intended to provide entry or exit to any structure or building: or public way. I. All signs and sign structures shall be properly maintained in a safe, Page 31 of 62 Effective 9/5/00 City of Centerville Ord. #4 orderly condition at all times, including the replacement of defective parts, cleaning and other items required for the maintenance of the sign. Vegetation around, in front of, behind, and undemeath the base of ground signs for a distance of ten (10) feet shall be neatly trimmed and free of weeds, and no rubbish or debris that would constitute a fire or health hazard shall be permitted under or near the sign. J. No signs may be placed on utility poles in the community. K. There may be no more than one identical sign per lot in a residentially zoned area. Section 110 -020: Permitted Signs. A. Campaign signs posted by bona fide candidates for political office or by a person or group promoting a political issue for a candidate may be placed in any district subject to the requirements of the district. Campaign signs may be posted for a period not to exceed sixty (60) days and shall be removed within seven days following the date of the election. Only one sign per candidate will be allowed per lot B. Temporary banners and pennants employed for grand opening of business establishments, special events and holidays shall be removed within` fourteen (14) days after such an opening, event or holiday. Banners or pennants which are an integral part of the design or architecture of a building are permitted. C. One temporary ; identification sign, setting forth the name of the project, architect, engineers, contractors, planners and financing agencies, may be installed at a construction site in any district for the period of construction. The sign area of a temporary identification sign shall not exceed thirty -five (35) square feet. D. In any district, one temporary real estate sign may be erected for the purpose of advertising the lease or sale of property upon which it is placed: Only one such sign shall be permitted per street frontage. Such sign shall be removed within seven (7) days following lease or sale. E. Open house or other temporary signs that are placed and removed on the same clay. Page 32 of 62 Effective 9/5/00 City of Centerville Ord. #4 The maximum size of such signs for each district is as follows: Residential Districts B Ten (10) square feet Agriculture and Public/Institutional Districts B Twenty -five (25) square feet Commercial /Industrial Districts B Thirty -two (32) square feet Section 110 -030: Portable Signs. Portable signs are prohibited in residential districts. Portable signs in all other Districts are allowed with permit as specifically authorized below. Portable signs used for the purpose of directing the public will be permitted subject to the following conditions: A. Said sign is coincidental to or used in conjunction with a public function; and B. Said sign is used for a special business promotion or event; and C. The period of use for such a sign shall not exceed fourteen (14) consecutive days; and D. No business may have more than six (6) special promotions or events per year; and E. Portable signs may not exceed eighty, (80) square feet. Section 110-040: Comprehensive Sign Plan Required. A Comprehensive Sign Plan is required at the time of Planning and Zoning Commission review of any proposed commercial or industrial development. Said plan shall indicate the location, size, height, color, lighting and orientation of all proposed signs and shall be submitted for approval pursuant to the regulations of the City Centerville. A. The following signs are permitted in the Residential and Public /institutional Districts: 1. Name Plate Signs :. One (1) sign not to exceed two (2) square feet in area for each Singie -. Family; detached, dwelling or sik (6) square feet in area for each Multiple- family and Public/Institutional building. Said nameplate shall indicate only name and address.; and 2. Public, Institutional, and Recreational Signs: One sign bulletin board per street frontage for each permitted use in said district; provided said sign shall' not exceed fifty (50). square feet- in area and shall be placed outside of the street right -of -way with the exception of the center Page 33 of 62 Effective 9/5/00 City of Centerville Ord. #4 island and shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height; and 2. Area Identification Sign: One (1) sign not to exceed twenty-four (24) square feet in area for each planned residential district entrance, provided said sign is not placed within any street right -of -way and does not exceed ten (10) feet in height. B. The following signs are permitted in the Commercial and Industrial Districts: 1. Wall Signs: Wall signs are permitted on each public street exposure or public parking exposure provided said signage does not exceed ten percent (10%) of said wall area; and 2. Free Standing Signs:, One (1) free standing sign per street frontage provided, however, said sign does not exceed eighty (80) square feet in area and twenty (20) feet in height; and 3. Area Identification: Signs: One (1) area identification sign is permitted per street frontage per commercial or industrial development provided, however, said sign does not exceed sixty-four (64) square feet in area and twenty (20) feet in height, and is not placed within ten (10) feet of any street right -of -way. Division 115: Height Section 115 -010: Dwellings. No dwelling or other building may be erected to a height exceeding thirty-five (35) feet without the issuance of a Special Use Permit. Section 115 -020: Excess Height on a Permit. Upon the securing of a Special Use Permit any building may be erected to a height exceeding that specified for the respective district providing: A. The front, rear and side yards shall be increased one (1) foot for each one (1) foot by which the building exceeds the height limit established for such district; and B. The structure is any of the following: television and radio towers, church spires, belfries, monuments, tanks, water and fire towers, grain Page 34 of 62 e ntervitte 1880 Main Street • Centerville, MN 55038 Established 1857 (651) 429 -3232 • Fat (651) 429 4629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA rITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICE OF VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CENTERVILLE PLANNING & ZONING COMMITTEE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Centerville Planning and Zoning Committee will hold a public hearing and may take action on the following matter: ITEM: Variance PETITIONER: Mr. & Mrs. Stan Hasiak PROPERTY I.D. #: R23- 31 -22 -22 -0040 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE W 255 FT OF N 140 FT OF NE / OFSW''AOF SEC 23TWP31 RGE22, EX RD, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC ADDRESS: 6994 Centerville Road The petitioner requests the Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission consider granting a variance for the above - mentioned property. The variance is to allow enlargement of a non - conforming pole barn structure. Said enlargement is for the purpose of storage. The said hearing will take place on Tuesday, October 3, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter. This public hearing will be continued to the Council Meeting on Wednesday, October 11, 2000 at Centerville City Hall in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter. The City Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assisted devices or a sign language interpreter must be received before 4:00 p.m. September 26, 2000. All persons interested are invited to attend and to be heard. You may contact the City Clerk's Office at (651) 429 -3232 or by facsimile (651) 492 -8629 if you need additional information. September 20, 2000 /s/ Teresa Bender Clerk/Treasurer abcdefghi j klmnopgrstuvwxyz Published in the Quad Community Press September 26 and October 3, 2000 ,.. ....'_Yid a , © i�: � 11 — 2 _.i n 3 "N>.."-----. .. r1 1 g I I I I I > Ma 1 • I 1Z 1>U 1i 3 1 / 'ICRITAGC SMELT � 1 3 08 ,ma lam PPM ma final I/ J l nee � 4 :; I 1 1 1 I '•` / r J . 2 PARCEL 36 �� _roam 364 nzurel;'�____ B IMO 115. q� aaa eon 5273 a 1 . 0.555 9 1 EAGLE '2 ells 14 1s to t 27 ER - I 11 1 — MEMORIAL PARK PARK 1 N r , s 3 a s s 11 o e o to 11 12 13 1e _ .I . . 1 1 o /•� MITER STREET Z no. me 3 ^ 1 >}a M na3 m /e / / / { »0 1500 '006 T. N 0 2 S ! r B \ to � ) r' ` 1 1 2 1 1> t] I >a ,a `- / 1. 1 / • '_ . °J� e 5 - • ■ MrMrs FirstName LastName Addressl Mr. & Richard Thompson/Current 7008 Mrs. Owner Centerville Road Chauncy 7024 Barett Centerville Gardens Road Mr. & Harold Rivard/Current 7046 Mrs. Owner Centerville Road Mr. Dean Anderson/Current 6961 Owner Centerville Road Mr. & John Rieder /Current 6977 Mrs. Owner Centerville Road Mr. & John Salin/Current Owner 1716 Mrs. Heritage Street Mr. & Steven Lieffring/Current 1724 Mrs. Owner Heritage Street Tong Shie Chu/Current Owner 6956 Meadow Circle Mr. & Ramon Lichtenberg/Current 6959 Mrs. Owner Meadow Circle Accent 6960 Homes /Current Meadow Owner Circle Ms. Kathleen Tomperi/Current 6965 Owner Meadow Circle David Masonry & 6966 Pearson Construction/Current Meadow Owner Circle Current Owner 6967 Meadow Circle Mr. & Jon Grahek/Current 6970 Mrs. Owner Meadow Circle Mr. & John Domagall/Current 6978 Mrs. Owner Meadow Circle Mr. & Jeffrey Paar /Current Owner 6984 Mrs. Meadow Circle Mr. & Gregory Glaser /Current 6992 Mrs. Owner Meadow Circle Current Owner 1704 Meadow Lane Mr. & Timothy Linger /Current 1712 MrMrs FirstName LastName Addressl Mrs. Owner Meadow Lane Mr. & Kevin Brommerich/Cutrent 1723 Mrs. Owner Meadow Lane Mr. & John McLean/Current 1724 Mrs. Owner Meadow Lane Mr. & Andrew Barborak 1728 Mrs. Meadow Lane Mr. & Joel Hubbell/ Current 1735 Mrs. Owner Meadow Lane Mr. & Dennis Juvland/Current 1743 Mrs. Owner Meadow Lane Mr. & Brian Nelson/Current 1747 Mrs. Resident Meadow Lane Lois Cordes/Current 1751 Owner Meadow Lane Mr. & Stan Hasiak 6994 Mrs. Centerville Road :: r l tt ervi tt e 1880 Main Street • Centerville, MN 55038 FstaRished 1857 CITY OF CENTERVILLE (612) 429 -3232 • fax (612) 429 -8629 APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE OR REZONING VARIANCE FEE 767- # f y /ti ��& REZONING DATE PAID % Z / 6D STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Gj / / �( GG�V �< :` -,e_b w / at iv,. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: _ r'4N Pe-0 111e- to -c-c- r O c-C - wr7e t-I tS /U %._ 0 F : AJE - %_ of Si/t/ 1 /e i sL - - - r; 23 3/ 22.3/ - Ge 5 5/6 SIZE OFPARCEL(S) / )C 2.. . PROPERTY OWNER: 5 /M✓ ///9-S /f9 PHONE # 4'07 - 7S? FEE OWNER • ADDRESS: APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY: • FEE OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER LEASE HOLDER OPTION TO PURCHASE DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: »J j O T E.. PO45 2i9fN ,q . _ Ir .5r0Riay= sea 7 ...-970_,s, N6 I- i,A/ ? - tt / 54 Rte= . cr- r4-/Rs I l 7 _no .77,. �. &4EAV- 0 -- 9 jV©<a./ 3 -- Qt,/s,L 2 /2 /M 1/E- / y1/jV v✓1 C1ii. 1 2 Pcp51--f 010 // 7,es 1 Gos- -s/°L/ 7 - 77).e _ c P✓i R r/ x'-1-5 / CD l) e+- /-� it / 5 NCuSH J) Oil / r M4- V/ t,'9 icz-nio'L' / .3 - Gg'O /.✓L .GfIC� . cs/ - /ADG GT/lt AO Y - . REASON FOR REQUEST: . /IV poLc, B:4-7.l✓ cN6 75 / %oL Co S /0/e/ /410.10/s VLi 7QGL -C . 5 /4, i f i ev Tr- f t-Alp rw,= Ct, : �P S/ .06 % n _,DO -L -/ _c/ ; ,7)4- /N/2=ll/&w , / gici 1 worn) ws/A/Q- foc -e= 84 0,5 c", 77) ,e7 t. , `752-89)4A - 4- f-/te, y ,n,' R ,4_ * Plus any additional costs Signatu e of applicant incurred for engineering, 5 j ,� o- 4 4,1'- _ legal fees, publication or Signature of property owner other requirements. O o�on D at r e tervitle 1880 Main Street • Centerville, MN 55035 Established 1857 (651) 429 -3232 • Fax (651) 429 -8629 19 September 2000 To: Mr. Stan Hasiak 6994 Centerville Road Centerville MN 55110 Re: Detached Pole Shed Alterations Dear Mr. Hasiak: This letter is a follow -up to the stop work order issued on the 15th of September for the interior and exterior alterations to the detached pole shed. The building is a non - conforming structure and as such may not be expanded or its use extended or intensified per Ordinance #4, subdivision 30. This letter serves notice that the interior electrical, insulation drywall, heating, plumbing and the exterior framing which was started without a building permit must be removed by 30 November 2000 - You have 30 days to appeal this order in writing to the City subject to the requirements in Ordinance #4. The appeal should include a statement of the specific order protested and any materials of facts to support the claim. 1 he appeal should descnoe the relief sought and the reasons why it is claimed the protest order should be reversed, modified or otherwise set aside. Failure to appeal this order shall constitute a waiver of the right to an administrative hearing and adjudication of the notice and order or to any portion thereof. A building permit is required prior to the removal of any portion of the building which can be obtained from City Hall during regular business hours. Cordially, • Paul P 'c Works Director/Building Official CC: Jim March, City Administrator Jim Hoeft, City Attorney City Council Planning & Zoning Commission Effective 9/5/00 City of Centerville Ord. #4 • conveyance does not result in the division of the parcel into two or more lots or parcels, any one of which is less than five (5) acres in area or three hundred (300) feet in width; and G. Is a single parcel of residential or agricultural land of not less then twenty (20) acres and having a width of not Tess than five hundred (500) feet and its conveyance does not result in the division of the parcel into two or more lots or parcels, any one of which is less than twenty (20) acres in area or five hundred (500) feet in width. Lot, Substandard - A lot or parcel of land that has less than the required minimum area or width, as established by the zone in which it is located and provided that such lot or parcel was recorded as a legally created lot on the effective date of the ordinance codified in this title. Lot, Through - A lot having its front and rear yards each abutting on a street. Lot, Width - The horizontal distance between side lot lines, measured at the required front setback line. Manufactured Housing - Single- family detached housing that is built to the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974, and shall include structures known as manufactured homes or mobile homes. Mineral Extraction - The extraction of soil, sand, gravel, rock or other such material from the land. Motor Vehicle - A self - propelled vehicle for personal or business use as defined in Minnesota Statutes 169.01. Motor Fuel Station - An establishment where gasoline, diesel, kerosene, motor oil and lubricants are sold or used in servicing motor vehicles and where usual motor vehicle repairs and services are performed. Non - Conforming Structure or Use - A structure or use lawfully in existence on the effective date of this ordinance or any amendment thereto and not conforming to the regulations for the district in which it is situated. Nursing Home or Rest Home - A licensed establishment having accommodations for the continuous care of two or more invalid, infirm, aged convalescent patients or disabled persons that are non - related. Open Space - Any unoccupied land space open to the sky. Ordinary High Water Line (OHWL) - A line delineating the highest water level which has been maintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence on the landscape. The Page 9 of 62 Effective 9/5/00 City of Centerville Ord. /t4 • determine whether certain provisions in this Ordinance are affected by other Ordinances. Division 25: Lot Provisions Lots of Record A. No lot of record shall be reduced in size below the district requirements in Section 080 -030; and B. An existing lot of record shall be deemed a buildable lot even though the lot area and/or dimensions are Tess than those required for the district provided as follows: 1. Evidence must be presented that the lot in question met minimum requirements for the division of property under ordinance regulations in effect at the time of the division of property; and 2. It fronts on a public street; and 3. The lot is within seventy percent (70 %) of the minimum lot area and lot width required. C. If two (2) or more lots are in single ownership and if all or part of the lots do not meet the width and area requirements of this Ordinance, the contiguous Tots shall be considered to be an undivided parcel for the purpose of this Ordinance. Division 30: Non - Conforming Uses and Structures Any structure or use existing upon the effective date of the adoption of this Ordinance which does not conform to the provisions of the Ordinance may be continued subject to the following conditions: A. The non - conforming use is not expanded or enlarged, except in conformity with the provisions of this Ordinance; and B. If a non - conforming use is discontinued or a non - conforming structure is abandoned for a period of six (6) months, further use of the structure or property must conform to this Ordinance; and C. If a non - conforming use is replaced by another use, the new use shall conform to this Ordinance; and Page 16 of 62 • Effective 9/5/00 City of Centerville Ord. #4 ,, s D. If a non-conforming use or structure is damaged by' =any cause toahe extent that repair or replacement costs exceed fifty percent (50 %) 1of the market value, the use or structure may not be replaced or repaired except in conformity with this Ordinance; -and E. Normal maintenance of _a non- conforming structure is permitted, including necessary non - structural repairs and incidental alterations which do not extend or intensify the non - conforming use. Division 35: Home Occupations Home occupations in the City must meet the following criteria: A. Home occupations shall be conducted solely by persons residing in the residence with the exception of no more than one additional non- related employee; and B. All business activities and storage shall take place within the structure; and C. There shall be no alteration to the exterior of the residential dwelling, accessory building or yard that in any way alters the residential character of the premises; and D. No more than one (1) sign not exceeding two (2) square feet with a maximum height of three (3) feet identifying the occupation shall be used; and E. The occupation shall not be visible or audible from any property line; and F. The occupation may involve limited retail sale or rental of products on the premises, provided all stock in trade is completely enclosed in the principal structure. Retail merchandise may not constitute more than fifty percent (50 %) of the principal structure square footage; and G. Unless completely enclosed within an approved structure, no vehicle used in the conduct of the occupation shall be parked, stored or otherwise present at the premises other than such as is customarily used for domestic or household purposes. See Section 135 -140: Outside Storage.; and H. Only on -site off - street parking facilities typically associated with a residence shall be used; and I. The conduct of an occupation or the use of substances which may be Page 17 of 62 4 1 ; • 1 e tervi ire 1880 Main Street • Centerville, MN 55038 - Established 257 (651) 429 -3232 to Fat (651) 429 -8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE NOTICE OF VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CENTERVILLE PLANNING & ZONING COMMITTEE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Centerville Planning and Zoning Committee will hold a public hearing and may take action on the following matter: ITEM: Variance PETITIONER: Mr. & Mrs. Pedro Salazar PROPERTY I.D. #: R14 -31 -22-42 -0029 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT/UNIT 13 BLK/TRACT 3 CENTER HILLS 1 ADD ADDRESS: 7336 Old Mill Road The petitioner requests the Centerville Planning and Zoning Commission consider granting a variance for the above - mentioned property. The variance is to allow construction of a six (6) foot, wood, privacy fence on or adjacent to the rear and side yard property lines, with the north side of the fence encroaching into the street right -of -way by approximately one (1) foot. The said hearing will take place on Tuesday, October 3, 2000 at the Centerville City Hall, 1880 Main Street in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:30 p.m. or shortly thereafter. This public hearing will be continued to the Council Meeting on Wednesday, October 11, 2000 at Centerville City Hall in the Council Chambers beginning at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter. The City Hall is ADA accessible. Requests for hearing assisted devices or a sign language interpreter must be received before 4:00 p.m. September 26, 2000. All persons interested are invited to attend and to be heard. You may contact the City Clerk's Office at (651) 429 -3232 or by facsimile (651) 492 -8629 if you need additional information. September 20, 2000 /s/ Teresa Bender Clerk/Treasurer abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz Published in the Quad Community Press September 26, and October 3, 2000 W 4 +P4 „. "S. • a TRACT A s 3 IRACT O. 1 l' � • ¢ + 2 t -' i Tate', i ;Si, ^ 4 _ .. e2! wl 1632 14 4 1 1669 1m CW AI _ 1426 1044 %WI 166 lee. A 6 I ,t • • ..t : CREEK IMI — I J � , + pm( x 4..._.. ' 1 M 1 S LAKE 74 , ® � �N , 2 2 1 + •o I a ii I r.:: qtr \` is no ®1/1 4 733D 5 AI I ® to teae 1442 eAli 1454 1662 1622 Tea 1 1� 11.6 3 p 2f 4 � 6 O l a f a } . 2 Ia a `OX sir . � 6 IS I IS 121 10 0 __. e 7221 � � � � I 1". 1'02 1.5 I,e.r Pea dma 122 Ire;: 1 ✓ 3 ' a .a. PC i 7 - s k 7380 Sfit£ET f .,• 4 - . 2 - mII 1426 ,t3 Iew 1544 652 569 an ,mn I "• 2 4 1 9118,_ a. ] 1 3 4 0 I 1 2 I a 5 6 1 a r2 3 ® M1 �i :i' 2 12 eiV ¢ I' 1 t 1 1 s e 2 I t a a s ... a 7 ND 1/2 . 1 ® 1e 1_ 1421 P QR78 6 1 4,1P," .vim � I . a �� Inv i II ma t 9 0i ;11111 11 ,f X ^ ®l� 13 11 IO Te i y3 1 4 .. F. p o J s ma, r p iir n 13 f �K ' G - r ��r 2 STEVEN LM'C � ��' a PARK ] 6 � ® X920 16 IY 11401944 19]0 �... le 16 I) c 4 1 S I ';.1• % 6 a align io 1663 1061 lets can - -- "an ‘111111111 iiipaillin I 1111 1 5 f 1 t f 1 ' 0 07 , , MOM %lip e • $ a t_,F F 2 fj . i.et r• ® F � � Pari4 F v 2 F ] ^'r r a E w ] 70/0 Tali 1024 IOW .612 1.44 • C 6,. \/]\\ 2 1• F t a 1 ] 1 + ] F - 61' ^ . - - - _ te n c a` (' . ` .. i / • ` + �� j S l 1 4 r 3 @ 1 MrMrs FirstName LastName Addressl • Mr. & James Zubersky /Current 7291 Old Mrs. Resident Mill Road Mr. & Daniel Selland/Current 7299 01d Mrs. Owner Mill Road Mr. & Daniel Vander 7306 Old Mrs. Heiden/Current Mill Road Owner Ms. Jacqueline Smith/Current 7310 Old Owner Mill Road Mr. & Matthew Rehbein/Current 7313 Old Mrs. Owner Mill Road Mr. & Tmiothy Glasow /Current 7319 Old Mrs. Owner Mill Road Mr. & Kenneth Engelmeier /Current 7322 Old Mrs. Owner Mill Road Mr. & Burton Essex/Current 7333 Old Mrs. Owner Mi11 Road Mr. & Pedro Salalar 7336 Old Mrs. Mill Road Mr. & Troy Greene/Current 7354 01d Mrs. Owner Mill Road Mr. & Jon Krueger /Current 7368 Old Mrs. Owner Mill Road Current Owner 738101d Mill Road Current Owner 7384 01d Mill Road Mr. Robert Citro /Current 1833 Owner Quebec Street Mr. & Marc Braeger /Current 1839 Mrs. Owner Quebec Street Mr. & Mark Farrell/Current 1845 Mrs. Owner Quebec Street Mr. & Grant Peters/Current 1817 Mrs. Owner Revoir Street Mr. & Gregory West/Current 1825 Mrs. Owner Revoir Street Mr. & Daniel Nelson/Current 1828 Mrs. Owner Revoir Street Mr. & Kenneth Anderson/Current 1831 Mrs. Owner Revoir Street Mr. & Stephen Dont/Current 1836 Mrs. Owner Revoir Street Mr. & Raymond DeVine/Current 1837 Mrs. Owner Revoir Street Mr. Thomas Fairbrother 1844 MrMrs FirstName LastName Addressl Revoir Street Mr. & David Wroblewski 1845 Mrs. Revoir Street Mr. & Paul Ledin/Current 1852 Mrs. Owner Revoir Street • C' to t . itte 1880 2(ain Street • Centerville, 9( 55038 Established 1857 CITY OF CENTERVILLE (612) 429 -3232 • Fax(612)429-8629 APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE OR REZONING & VARIANCE ✓ _ FE# /0- ' ° ' % # // REZONING DATE PAID 9410 STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY: a i � LL_R ±trvl tt rnr . ' i LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: ,1 -3/ Zz-�z — D429 SIZE OF PARCEL (S) PROPERTY OWNER 3 L1ru �.1 _ PHONE # FEE OWNER ADDRESS: APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY: FEE OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER LEASE HOLDER OPTION TO PURCHASE DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: • REASON FOR REQUEST: ,\ � *1 * Plus any additional costs S;, ,p incurred for engineering, V legal fees, publication or atur / / e r �f pr pfirjowner other requirements. Date vv�) Effective 9/5/00 • City of Centerville Ord. #4 Essential Services - Public and private utilities required by the resident and working population. Family - An individual, or two (2) or more persons related by blood, marriage or adoption, or a group of not more than five (5) persons not so related, living together as a single housekeeping unit using common cooking and kitchen facilities. Facade - The exterior wall of a building exposed to a public view or that wall viewed by persons not within the building. Fence - Any artificially constructed barrier of any material or combination of materials erected to enclose or screen areas of land. Flood Plain - Flood plain or flood -prone area means any land area susceptible to being inundated by water from any source. Floodway - The channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the 100 -year flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than one foot at any point. Floodway Fringe - All that land in a flood plain not Tying within a delineated floodway. Land within a floodway fringe is subject to inundation by relatively low velocity flows and shallow water depths. Floor Area - The sum of the gross horizontal areas of the several floors of a building or dwelling unit, measured from the exterior walls or from the centerline of party walls separating buildings, excluding basements. Floor Area Ratio - The total floor area on a zoning lot divided by the total site area of the lot or parcel being developed. Freestanding Sign - Any sign supported by structures or supports that are permanently anchored in the ground and that are independent from any building or structure. Frontage - The front or frontage is that side of a lot abutting on a street or way and ordinarily regarded as the front of the lot, but it shall not be considered as the ordinary sideline of a corner lot. Garage, Private - Any accessory building or an accessory portion of a principal building designed or used solely for the storage of motor vehicles, boats and other personal belongings which are owned or used by the occupants of the building to which it is accessory. Glare - A sensation of brightness within the visual field that causes annoyance, discomfort, or loss in visual performance and visibility. Page 6 of 62 Effective 9/5100 • City of Centerville Ord. #4 D. An exterior wall may be temporary and a future expansion area of a structure and be subject to removal or redesign as an interior wall. Buildings are required to have contrasting architectural features and must be designed to be aesthetically pleasing. Division 100: Industrial Exterior Building Materials Industrial buildings are required to be constructed of brick, decorative block or approved textured masonry product. Pole barn type buildings are not allowed. Buildings are required to have contrasting architectural features and must be designed to be aesthetically pleasing. Division 105: Fences A. All fences shall be located entirely upon the property of the fence owner unless the owner of the adjoining property agrees, in writing, that said fence may be erected on the property line of the respective properties. Such an agreement shall be submitted at the time of building permit application. If the adjoining property owner does not agree to the erection of such fence, the fence shall be set back a minimum of two (2) feet from all lot lines; No fence other than a decorative fence may be constructed along the side lot lines of a residential lot between the street and the front extension of the dwelling house. As used herein, the term "decorative fence" means a wood vertical post and wood horizontal rail fence with no more than three (3) rails or a wood picket type fence with at least two (2) inches of open space between each picket. B. No residential fence may exceed six (6) feet in height and no decorative fence in the front yard may exceed thirty-six (36) inches in height. Fencing in commercial/industrial zoning shall not exceed eight (8) feet in height C. All fences shall be constructed and maintained in a substantial workmanlike manner and of material reasonably suited for the purpose for which the fence is proposed to be used Every fence shall be constructed so that the side containing the framing supports and cross pieces face the interior of the fence owner's lot. Any fence which does not comply with the provisions of this Section or which endangers the public safety, health or welfare shall be considered a public nuisance. Section 105 -010: Snow -Stop Fencing. Snow -stop fencing may be used from November 1 to April 1. No permit shall be required for temporary fencing. Page 30 of 62 F p f MEMO DATE : October 6, 2000 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE : Northern Forest Products Tax Abatement ***************************** ***** * * * * ** ** * * **** * **** ** * ***• Included in your packet is a resolution that calls for an official tax abatement hearing on November g in regards to a five -year tax abatement for the proposed Northern Forest Products expansion. Also included in your packet is a timeline from Ehlers for putting this abatement together. A hearing was published for this meeting to gather public input on the proposed abatement prior to the official hearing. I am not anticipating any public input on the issue. I will be working with Ehlers and Paul McDowell to establish the proposed increase in taxable market valuation. These numbers should be available by the Council meeting on October 25`". OCT. 6. 2044 1 : 3 4 P M EH! ERS & ASSOC. "0 4247 P. 2 .t r SCHEDULE OF EVENTS CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL FOR NORTHERN FOREST PRODUCTS (NFP) PROJECT As of Ogtober 6.2000 October 11,2000 Final Cashflows Prepared (incorporating 1997 increment,additional payment from NFP, and any additional increment received to date). October 11, 2000 City Council calls for a public hearing on granting up to 5 years of tax abatement. October 20, 2000 Final documents circulated. October 23, 2000 Date of publication of hearing notice on abatement (at least 10 days prior to hearing). [Quad Canunnniry Press publication deadline October 1 SJ November 8, 2000 City Council holds a public hearing on granting up to five-years of tax abatement and passes resolution approving abatement. City Council approves revision to Northern Forest Products tax increment note. November 15, 2000 Closing Pay off Fehbein Note. Sign revised NFP Note structured for net of funds available. KtItiol it a C tervitce shed 1880 Main Street • Centerville, MN 55038 �f ( 1857 (651) 429.3232 • `fax (651) 429 -8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION 00 - 25 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENTS FOR THE NORTHERN FOREST PRODUCTS PROJECT WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.1812 through 469.1815, both inclusive (the "Act "), authorize the City of Centerville, Minnesota (the "City"), upon satisfaction of certain conditions, to grant an abatement of all or a part of the taxes levied by the City of certain property; and WHEREAS, The City has received a request from the Northern Forest Products, In the City (the "Company "), that the City grant an abatement for a portion of the property taxes on certain land owned or to be acquired by the Company on which the Company operates a manufacturing facility; and WHEREAS, the Act requires the City to hold a public hearing prior to adoption of a resolution granting any property tax abatements; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Centerville, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Hearing. A public hearing on the consideration of granting a property tax abatement to the Company as requested will be held at the time and place set forth in the Notice of Hearing attached hereto as Exhibit A and hereby made a part hereof. 2. Notice. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of said hearing in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A to be given one publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least 10 days but not more than 30 days before the hearing. The newspaper must be one of general interest and readership in the City, and must be published at least once per week. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and, upon a vote being taken thereon after full discussion thereof, the following voted in favor thereof; • • And the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this 11 day of October, 2000. Mayor ATTEST: Jim March, City Administrator Centennial Fire District • 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 784 -7472 - Office (651) 784 -2427 - Fax October 4, 2000 TO: City Council City of Centerville City Council City of Circle Pines City Council City of Lino Lakes FROM: Milo Bennett SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures and approval for payment of expenses. Your approval of expenses, as listed on the attached copy of the check register, checks #12381 — 12391, in the amount of $3,436.70 is hereby requested. s Centennial Fire District Page 1 of 1 Check Register • DATE CHECK# NAME ACCOUNT AMOUNT 10/03/2000 12381 Anoka - Hennepin Technical College 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 420.00 10103/2000 12382 Circle Pines Utilities 42251 - Station 1 - Gas 17.83 10/03/2000 12383 Institute for Environmental Assessment 42110 - Other Maintenance 421.26 10/03/2000 12384 Metro Fire 42130 - Equipment Expense 671.59 10/03/2000 12385 Oxygen Service Company 42270 - Breathing Air 73.43 10/03/2000 12386 Postmaster 42180 - Office Supplies 99.00 10/0312000 12387 Reliant Energy Minnegasco 42253 - Station 2 - Gas 107.55 10103/2000 12388 Rouse Mechanical 42110 - Other Maintenance 884.30 10/03/2000 12389 Verizon Wireless 42240 - Telephone 169.96 10/03/2000 12390 Viking Office Supplies 42180 - Office Supplies 317.32 10/03/2000 12391 Photoworld 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 2$4.4Q Total $3,436.70 t sr liii 8onestroo Owner: City of Centerville, 1880 Main St., Centerville, MN 55038 Date: October 2, 2000 Rosene Ander1ik5 For Period: 9/6/2000 to 10/2/2000 Request No: 2 Associates Engineers 6 Architects Contractor: Northdale Construction Co. Inc., 14450 Northdale Blvd., Rogers, MN 55374 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT HUNTERS CROSSING BRA FILE NO. 616 -00 -114 SUMMARY 1 Original Contract Amount $ 502,779.56 2 Change Order - Addition $ 0.00 3 Change Order - Deduction $ 0.00 4 Revised Contract Amount $ 502,779.56 5 Value Completed to Date $ 405,146.25 6 Material on Hand $ 0.00 7 Amount Earned $ 405,146.25 8 Less Retainage 5% $ 20,257.31 9 Subtotal $ 384,888.94 10 Less Amount Paid Previously $ 184,945.15 11 Liquidated damages - $ 0.00 12 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 2 $ 199 943.79 , Recommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. L P, I GEC/ Appr d b Contractor: Approved by Owner: 11ORTHD E CONSTRUCTION CO INC CITY OF CENTERVILLE /ice n Specified Contract Completion Date: Date: August 25, 2001 Request M2 Contract Unit Quantity Amount p No. Item Unit Quantity Price to Date to Date Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer - Centerville Road 1 Mobilization LS 1 13500.00 0.75 $10,125.00 2 Traffic control LS 1 2912.00 0.75 $2,184.00 3 Shouldering aggregate TN 50 24.45 50.00 4 Clear and Grub Tree 2 500.00 2 $1,000.00 5 Silt fence, regular LF 200 2.00 $0.00 6 Remove and replace 36" CMP LS 1 1500.00 1 $1,500.00 7 Salvage and replace gravel driveway TN 20 17.07 50.00 8 Connect to existing manhole EA 1 1500.00 1 $1,500.00 9 12" PVC, SDR 35, 8'- 10' deep LF 250 28.09 250 $7,022.50 10 12" PVC. SDR 35, 10'- 12' deep LF 175 28.09 175 54,915.75 11 12" PVC, SDR 35, 12 14' deep LF • 10 28.09 10 5280.90 12 12" PVC, SDR 35, 14' -16' deep LF 265 28.09 265 $7,443.85 13 12" PVC, SDR 26, 16'- 18' deep LF 5 30.54 5 $152.70 14 12" PVC, SDR 26, 18' - 20' deep LF 15 30.54 15 $458.10 15 4' dia. sanitary manhole EA 1 1394.73 1 $1,394.73 16 Manhole overdepth LF 3 99.97 3 $299.91 17 Adjust MH frame and ring casting EA 1 150.00 1 $150.00 18 Remove bituminous street SY 330 2.00 250 $500.00 19 Patch bituminous street SY 330 15.92 $0.00 20 Salvage and reinstall 12" CMP culvert LF 40 16.67 40 $666.80 21 Improved pipe foundation LF 720 0.01 $0.00 22 Fiber blanket on steep slopes SY 600 2.08 $0.00 23 Seeding with topsoil and mulch AC 0.75 998.40 50.00 Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer - Centerville Road 539,594.24 Part 2 - Water Main - Centerville Road 24 Connect to existing 12" water main EA 1 750.00 1 $750.00 25 12" PVC, C900 LF 1062 23.86 1062 $25,339.32 26 8" PVC, C900 LF 35 16.71 35 $584.85 27 6" PVC, C900 LF 50 14.24 50 $712.00 28 8" gate valve and box EA 1 652.74 1 $652.74 29 12" butterfly valve and box EA 3 851.33 3 $2,553.99 30 Hydrant with gate valve and box EA 3 1899.17 3 55,697.51 31 Valve rod extension EA 7 143.49 $0.00 32 Fittings LB 3000 ' 1.15 2500 $2,875.00 33 Improved pipe foundation LF 1100 0.01 $0.00 34 Sodding SY 700 2.55 $0.00 35 12" pipe restraint EA 20 69.64 20 $1,392.80 36 8" pipe restraint EA 4 39.85 4 $159.40 37 Seeding with topsoil and mulch PC 0.25 1018.64 $0.00 Total Part 2 - Water Main - Centerville Road $40,717.61 Part 3 - Services - Centerville Road 38 12" x 6" PVC wye EA 2 236.27 2 5472.54 39 12" x 4" PVC wye EA 2 229.88 2 $459.76 40 4" PVC, Schedule 40 service pipe LF 40 11.22 35 5392.70 41 6" HDPE sewer service directional drill LF 156 42.02 150 56,303.00 42 4" PVC, Schedule 40 riser pipe LE 10 17.47 10 5174.70 43 1" copper water service LF 90 8.59 80 5687.20 44 1" copper service directional drill LF 400 9.39 380 $3,568.20 45 Reconnect water service EA 1 178.76 1 $178.76 46 Connect to existing sewer service EA 1 178.76 1 $178.76 47 1" curb stop and box EA 6 132.51 6 $795.06 48 1" corporation stop EA 7 143.16 7 $1,002.12 Total Part 3 - Services - Centerville Road $14,212.80 . Part 4 - Sanitary Sewer - Hunters Crossing 49 8" PVC, SDR 35, 18'- 20' deep - jacked LF 60 246.99 60 $14,819.40 50 8" PVC, SDR 35, 8'- 10' deep LF 350 16.25 350 $5,687.50 51 8" PVC. SDR 35, 10'- 12' deep LF 900 18.37 900 $16,533.00 52 8" PVC, SDR 35, 12'- 14' deep LF 300 18.37 300 55,511.00 53 8" PVC, SDR 35, 14'- 16' deep LF 500 20.14 493 $9,929.02 54 4' diameter sanitary manhole EA 9 1362.87 10 $13,628.70 55 Manhole overdepth LF 56 99.97 50 54,998.50 56 Improved pipe foundation LF 2000 0.01 $0.00 Request It - 1 . Contract Unit Quantity Amount No. Item Unit Quantity Price to Date to Date Total Part 4 - Sanitary Sewer - Hunters Crossing $71,107.12 Part 5 - Water Main - Hunters Crossing 57 8" PVC. C900 - jacked LF 45 143.24 45 $6,445.80 58 8" PVC, C900 LF 1330 14.05 1310 $18,405.50 59 6" PVC, C900 LF 810 11.58 814 59,426.12 60 6" gate valve and box EA 2 490.86 2 $981.72 61 8" gate valve and box EA 4 652.74 4 $2,610.96 62 Hydrant with gate valve and box EA 6 1899.17 6 $11,395.02 63 Valve rod extension EA 12 98.49 $0.00 64 Gate valve wrench, 8' long EA • 1 39.08 $0.00 65 Gate valve wrench, 3' long EA 2 23.11 $0.00 66 Hydrant wrench EA 3 29.50 50.00 67 Fittings LB 3000 1.30 2500 53,250.00 68 Improved pipe foundation LF 1000 0.01 $0.00 69 8" pipe restraint EA 24 39.82 24 $955.68 70 6" pipe restraint EA 16 30.24 16 5483.84 71 Insulation, 2" thick SY 20 17.46 $0.00 Total Part 5 - Water Main - Hunters Crossing $53,954.64 Part 6 - Services - Hunters Crossing 72 8" x 4" PVC wye EA 37 76.63 37 $2,835.31 73 4" PVC sewer service LF 1710 6.64 1650 $10,956.00 - 74 4" PVC riser pipe LF 90 17.47 80 51,397.60 75 1" copper water service LF 1730 5.76 1650 $9,504.00 76 1" curb stop and box EA 37 107.51 37 $3,977.87 77 1" corporation stop EA 37 67.05 37 $2,480.85 78 Curb box wrench EA 3 34.82 $0.00 Total Part 6 - Services - Hunters Crossing 531,151.63 Part 7 - Storm Sewer - Hunters Crossing 79 12" HDPE LF 330 17.51 330 55,778.30 80 12" RCP, Class 5 LF 120 20.77 120 52,492.40 81 15" RCP, Class 5 LF 80 22.14 80 $1,771.20 82 18" HDPE LF 215 ' 22.91 215 $4,925.65 83 18" RCP, Class 5 LF 210 24.16 210 55,073.60 84 Improved pipe foundation LF 500 0.01 50.00 85 Catch basin EA 4 942.19 4 53,768.76 86 Catch basin manhole EA 4 1371.39 4 55,485.56 87 Pond outlet structure EA 1 1898.07 1 $1,898.07 88 12" RCP apron w /trash guard EA 1 534.52 1 $534.52 89 12" HDPE apron w /trash guard EA 1 254.43 1 $254.43 90 18" RCP apron w /trash guard EA 1 649.81 1 5649.81 91 18" HDPE apron w /trash guard EA 2 306.63 2 $613.26 92 Rock riprap, Class 3 CY 25 65.00 25 $1,625.00 93 Sodding SY 500 2.55 50.00 Total Part 7 - Storm Sewer - Hunters Crossing $34,870.56 Part 8 - Street - Hunters Crossing 94 Mill bituminous strip LF 100 3.12 50.00 95 Subgrade preparation RD STA 24 125.00 24 53,000.00 96 Granular borrow (CV) CY 5000 9.71 4000 $38,840.00 97 Aggregate base, Class 5 - streets TN 3300 9.30 2579.76 523,991.77 98 Aggregate base, Class 5 - trail TN 700 9.82 50.00 99 Type 31B bituminous base course TN 700 27.51 50.00 100 Type 41B bituminous wear course - streets TN 700 29.64 $0.00 101 Type 41A bituminous wear - trail TN 185 38.48 50.00 102 Bituminous material for tack coat GAL 400 1.30 50.00 103 Surmountable concrete curb and gutter LF 4400 6.66 4233 $28,191.78 104 Barricade EA 2 234.00 50.00 105 4" draintile LF 4260 3.42 4105 514,039.10 106 Geotextile fabric SY 9000 1.35 8500 $11,475.00 107 Seeding with topsoil and mulch AC 1.5 998.40 50.00 Total Part 8 - Street - Hunters Crossing $119,537.65 Request a2 Contract Unit Quantity Amount No. Item Unit Quantity Price to Date to Date ■ Total Part 1 - Sanitary Sewer- Centerville Road $39,594.24 Total Part 2 - Water Main - Centerville Road $40,717.61 Total Part 3 - Services - Centerville Road $14,212.80 Total Part 4 - Sanitary Sewer - Hunters Crossing $71,107.12 Total Part 5 - Water Main - Hunters Crossing $53,954.64 Total Part 6 - Services - Hunters Crossing $31,151.63 Total Part 7 - Storm Sewer - Hunters Crossing $34,870.56 Total Part 8 - Street - Hunters Crossing $119,537.65 Total Work Completed To Date $405,146.25 Request 12 PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS OWNER CITY OF CENTERVILLE BRA FILE NO. 616 - 00-114 CONTRACTOR NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO INC CHANGE ORDERS No. Date Description Amount Total Change Orders PAYMENT SUMMARY No. From To Payment Retainage Completed • 1 07/27/2000 09/05/00 184,945.15 9,733.96 194,679.11 2 09/06/2000 10/02/00 199,943.79 20,257.31 405,146.25 Material on Hand Total Payment to Date $384,888.94 Original Contract $502,779.56 Retainage Pay No 2 20,257.31 Change Orders Total Amount Earned $405,146.25 Revised Contract $502,779.56 Request 012 MEMO DATE : October 6, 2000 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE : Letter from Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division A letter from the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division was discussed at the last meeting. The letter referenced an alleged liquor violation stemming from the Trio Inn. At the meeting this item was tabled to allow the City Attorney to review the statutes in regards to enforcement provisions by the State. Consensus appeared to be towards not fining the establishment for the alleged violation. However, since the meeting I discussed this matter with the owner of the Trio Inn. I explained to him that even though the City may elect not to issue a civil penalty, the State could elect to levy a penalty. Mr. Montain indicated that he would be willing to donate $200 -$300 to the City of Centerville or the Centennial Lakes Police Department in further support of the work that they are doing to curtail underage liquor consumption. I indicated to Mr. Montain that this item was going to be placed on the agenda for this meeting. Y TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members FROM: Teresa Bender, Clerk/Treasurer < ,(6-. SUBJECT: Resolution 00 -23 DATE: October 6, 2000 It has been brought to the City's attention that Special Assessments for the Parkview Development were not removed from PIN #R23- 31 -22 -31 -0064 (6973 Meadow Circle) on Anoka County's records following Burnett Title's payment in July of 1999 and are showing on the property owner's statement of property tax payable in 2000. Attached, please find Resolution 00 -23 (Abatement of Special Assessments) and the appropriate paperwork needed to rectify this error with Anoka County Property Tax Division. Thank you for your consideration. A V e / V it e 1880 Main Street • Centerville, MN 55038 £SYQbhis 1857 (651) 429 -3232 •.Tax (651) 429 -8629 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION 00 - 23 RESOLUTION FOR ABATEMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (PARKVIEW ADDITION) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Centerville authorized the Parkview Addition Improvements; and WHEREAS, property/development petitioned for the stated improvement be financed in accordance with Minnesota Statue 429; and WHEREAS, the City of Centerville gave proper notification of such; and WHEREAS, $615,000 was assessed to benefited properties based upon square foot; and WHEREAS, Burnett Title paid to the City $11,524.72 on July 9, 1999; and WHEREAS, Anoka County Property Tax Division has acknowledged and certified $1,846.47 for the 2000 tax year; and WHEREAS, the Council has directed the Clerk/Treasurer to make a request of Anoka County to abate Parkview Addition assessment improvements from the property legally known as R23- 31 -22 -31 -0064 for the years 2000 through 2008; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that on October 11, 2000 the Centerville City Council authorized Anoka County to abate Parkview Addition Assessment Improvements from property legally known as R23- 31 -22 -3I -0064. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this 11 day of October, 2000. Mayor ATTEST: Jim March, City Administrator Anoka l.ounty unnsion or rroperly necoras ec r axation Aoaremenr rorm / (nev I /?!) APPLICATION FOR ABATEMENT - SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS (M.S. 375.192) For Taxes Assessed in 19 9 9 and Payable in 1999 - 20082 Please print or type. Applicant's Name City of Center Applicant's Mailing Address Applicant's Social Security Number City of Centerville Applicant's Telephone Number (651) 429 -3732 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 Date of Application 10/6/00 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Property 1.D. or Parcel Number R23- 31 -22 -31 -0064 Street Address (if different than above) City or Township School District Number 6973 Meadow Circle Cent Pry; 1 1P 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY LOT /UNIT 16 BLK /TRACT 2 PARKVIEW APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF FACTS On July 9, 1999 the City of Centerville received payment in full from Burnett Title (Ck 1/91831) to satisfy the special assessments on Lot 16, Block 2 PI R23- 31 -22 -31 -0064. The City of Centerville inaccurately updated their in___nal records and did not notify the County of payment in full. APPLICANT'S REQUEST Include fund number & amount due for payable tax year being abated, not total principal amount. Fund 82840 2000 - $1,846.47 2004 - $1,846.47 2001 - $1,846.47 2005 - $1,846.47 - 2002 - $1,846.47 2006 - $1,846.47 2003 - $1,846.47 2007 - $1,846.47 2004 - $1,846.47 2008 - $1,846.47 Applicant's Signature Date NOTE: Minnesota Statutes 1988, Section 609.41, "Whoever, in making any statement, oral or written, which is required or authorized by law to be made as a basis of imposing, reducing or abating any tax or assessment, intentionally makes any statement as to any material matter which the matter of the statement knows is false my be sentenced, unless otherwise provided by law, to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than 53,000, or both." • I be tollowtng accurately reflects both existing and proposed amounts. Tax Special Waste Penalty Interest Costs Total Assessments Fee Original Proposed • Reduction 1 ❑ Tax is Paid Date: , 19 ❑ Equal Annual ❑ Abatement ❑ Decline Balance ❑ Increase ❑ Tax is not Paid ❑ Flat Tax REPORT OF INVESTIGATION After examining the applicant's claims, I have carefully investigated this application and find the facts to be as follows: CITY/TOWN COUNCIL RESOLUTION NUMBER: RESOLUTION DATE: Signature of Investigator Date CERTIFICATIONS OF APPROVAL Note: For this abatement to be approved, the County Auditor and the County Board of Commissioners must favorably recommend its adoption. COUNTY AUDITOR'S RECOMMENDATION ❑ Approved ❑ Denied Auditor's Signature COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONER'S ACTION (to be completed by County Auditor) ❑ Approved❑ Denied I certify that at a meeting held , 19 the County Board took the above official action on this abatement. This action was duly adopted and entered upon the minutes of its proceedings as a public record, showing the names of taxpayers, other concerned persons and the amounts involved. CERTIFICATION OF FINAL APPROVAL (Completed only for approved abatements) I further certify that the approval of this abatement has resulted in the following changes: Reduction of Special Assessments $ Reduction Of Costs On Special Assmts $ Reduction Of Penalties On Special Assmts $ Total Amount Of Reduction Reduction Of Interest On Special Assmts $ Total Amount Payable Signature of County Auditor Date ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE Constant Annual Payment Method • Project: PARKVIEWADDITION Lot: / Project 260089M (0583) Block: Parcel: 23 - 22--31 - 1)O(0y Addition: Parkvi Owner: Rick Carlson Interest Start Date August 26, 1998 Repayment Period 10 yrs Interest Rate: 8.00% Assessments: Unit Measure Unit Price Amount Municipal Improvements LS 12,389.99 $ 12,389.99 YEAR SCHEDULED PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT REMAINING 1998 $ - $ - $ - $ 12,389.99 i lhQ / 1999 $ 2,025.70 $ 855.27 $ 1,170.43 $ 11 �g31 �a 2000 $ 1,846.47 $ 923.70 $ 922.78 $ 10,611.02 Q�� ! 2001 $ 1,846.47 $ 997.59 $ 848.88 $ 9,613.43 j� 2002 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,077.40 $ 769.07 $ 8,536.03 R � �° 2003 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,163.59 $ 682.88 $ 7,372.43 2004 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,256.68 $ 589.79 $ 6,115.76 2005 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,357.21 $ 489.26 $ 4,758.54 2006 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,465.79 $ 380.68 $ 3,292.75 2007 S 1,846.47 S 1,583.05 $ 263.42 $ 1,709.70 2008 $ 1,846.47 $ 1,709.70 $ 136.78 $ 0.00 $ 18,643.97 Total Scheduled Payment Eves Gas . t • • MEMO DATE : October 6, 2000 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE : Resolution #00 -24 Included in your packet is a copy of Resolution #00 -24. This resolution refers to the Building Quality Communities initiative that has been started by the League of Minnesota Cities. This initiative was unveiled at the annual League of Minnesota Cities conference that was held in June of this year. This resolution should be adopted to show our citizenry that we are committed to work towards making Centerville a quality community. a t ervide 1880 Main Street • Centerville, MN 55038 Established 1857 STATE OF MINNESOTA (651) 429 -3232 • Fax(651)429-8629 COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE RESOLUTION 00 - 24 RESOLUTION FOR CITY PARTICIPATION IN THE "MINNESOTA CITIES: BUILDING QUALITY COMMUNITIES" EFFORT IN COOPERATION WITH OUR FELLOW MEMBERS OF THE LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Centerville recognizes, supports and will participate in the "Minnesota Cities: Building Quality Communities" effort in cooperation with our fellow members of the League of Minnesota Cities. WHEREAS, the top values and priorities of citizens include safety, family, job opportunities, health, the well -being of children, and recreational opportunities; and WHEREAS, many of the services cities provide directly enhance those citizen priorities; and WHEREAS, it is one of the responsibilities of city officials to ensure legislators, media and citizens understand their governments through open and frequent communication using various avenues and means; and WHEREAS, it is important to encourage citizens to actively participate in city government, to share their views, and to work in partnership with city officials to ensure that the needs of the community are met; and WHEREAS, partnerships developed between citizens and city officials can result in greater understanding of the connection between Minnesota's high quality of life and the services provided by Minnesota cities, as well as in greater trust by citizens in the efforts of their city government; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that on October 11, 2000 the Centerville City Council hereby declares its commitment to join in the "Minnesota Cities: Building Quality Communities" statewide education effort in cooperation with our fellow members of the League of Minnesota Cities. We hereby designate Jim March, City Administrator as the City of Centerville's key contact for this effort, and will inform the League of Minnesota Cities of this designation. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this 11 day of October, 2000. Mayor ATTEST: Jim March, City Administrator • MEMO DATE : October 6, 2000 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE : Acorn Creek Park Trail Paving Included in your packet are two quotes for paving the trail in Acorn Creek Park. A diagram is also included that shows the area to be paved including the pathway around the playground equipment. Arcade Asphalt's quote is significantly lower than the quote received from Northdale Construction. I would recommend that Arcade be authorized to perform the work. They have previously done paving for the City and we were extremely pleased with the quality of the work. DUNCInVV nWCIIC NI WCnr.an n gig Iwo rv.w 1.1 �wv - rrw � .v irv rw. - rcr Fax Transmission miso zfi s ii so m ,,,em lee • Data: 10104100 From: Tom Peterson The To: Jim March Our File No: 616 gen • • Organization: Centerville Pages to follow: 3 Fax Number: 851- 429.8629 Original Will Follow in Mali: Yes 0 No Subject: Acorn Park Paving Quotas Jim, I received quotes from two contractors for paving trails in Aeom Park. They are attached for your review and approval, The low quote of $10,000.00 was from Arcade Asphalt, a focal contractor from Centerville. The second quote was from Northdale Construction (Hunters Crossing contractor), coming in at • $17,347.00. Also attached is a map of the Park showing the proposed work. We recommend that Arcade Asphalt be awarded the work at Acorn Park, at a total cost of $10,000.00. • This includes excavating for an 8' wide trail around the playground equipment, excavating at the south end of the trail where it connects to the Woods of Clearwater Creek trail, placing 6" of gravel at these two locations, grading and preparing the existing gravel trail through the park, and paving approximately 810 lineal feet at 8 wide bituminous trail as shown an the sketch. The price compares closely to my estimate of $9,000 fruit i miles m the year when the park was graded. Please call me at 651- 604.4868 with any questions. Matt at Arcade has Indicated he is ready to start the work as soon as he gets the okay • CC Paul Palter Dan Sehluender • • Sonestroo. Rosena, Anderllk and Associates, Inc. 2335 West Highway 36 St Paul MN 5.5113 • Phone 651.636.4600 Fax 85 , www.bonestroo.com „C. _ _ ,es 1A rut. tt e PM N:7 P, os saantanstannisnunna ginfeettnx uertates alaacr. /Amp., ACn " t'� ° ` "" Total Bass Bid: /0,O • Merllk 6 Address; (04:13 Rtkr_ Telephone No. ( rnenetnearrew «,s _C17, State, Zip: t-i` ui -k . 3S o `ir Fax No. Si4tt. QUOTATION FOR • ACORN PARK PAVE arrummOUs TRAILS BRA Fa.! N0, 616.OEN CENTERVILLE. MINNESOTA September 2?, 2000 • FP notable htayor and City Ccundt City of Centerville 1830 Maui Street Centerville, MN 55038 Dear Council hlembets: • The undersigned, being AniWar with your local conditions, having made the field inspection and investigations deemed necessary, having studies the drawings end specifications for the work including Addends Nos. and being familiar with all Paton and other conditions a(fect(ng the work and cost thereat, hereby proposes to turoith ail labor, toots, materiels, skills, equlpmeat, and all else necessary m eompleNfyconatruct the project in ercordance with the drawints end specifications on file with you and Bonosboo, Ronne, Anderllk & Asxlatet, Inc., 2333 Weet Highway 96, Sr Paul, Minnesota 55113, as follows; • No, Item Units Qty unit Prior Total Pr Type 4i Numinous wow MUM TN 100 1 C) $ Batt 2 Clue 5 tamp* base TN 140 S � 1 ► j jCgl Excavation and subgtode preparation LS 1 around playground r Toial East Sid Rtspectfully submittal, _AL\QALM Tic Name 0 anon l�/�r u :11063 (An vu a,ar p — �xt1C�L_t! [SC�- ,(A Padmership) • 9 Title P IAC Printed Name of Signer 636- g4R7 ♦ am/oiMkiln d, ( 6S; -(0)(. ° f311 P I 4e PVIV aIIWV RV dGnG 0 puiw enw,r. n v /IVJV 1J11 iv /V9/VP ITT x [j — G. , r vY IV.T UG U4 UU UE D 1 101 AN HORTHDALE CONST CO !NC FAX N0, 4124284897 P. 03 Bonesti00 Bidder: I !/f ro( . l/$bfYJtd?w, 6 4 To(! Bag Bid: • Rowe Antli b Address: I 450 41444 4 A ;v4. Telephone No. Associates n �uyuw «, Mt tttl! 1 City,Sratc, Zip; 1�tr '. AU% 55.5744 _ An No, QUOTATION FOR ACORN PARK • PAVE BITUMINOUS TRAILS ERA P83 NO.616.0EN CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA Sepnmbv 31, 2000 • • Honorable Mayor and City Council • • City of Centerville • 1880 Main Street Centervilie, 55038 Dear Council Members: • The undersigned, being familiar with your lode; conditions. having reedits Thad Inspection and Investigations deemed necessary, having studies the drawings and speclfltatioms for the work factualist; Addenda Nos. . • and being familiar with ell factors and other conditions effecting the work end cost thereof, hereby prcpoces to famish ,il labia took. materials, skills. equipment, and all else necaawry to completely construes the project in accordance with the drawings and sprr:ifirations on the with you end Boreatroo, Roan, Andertlk & Aswclates, !mt, 2335 West Highway 36, St Paul, Minnesota 37113, as follows: No. Item VIM Qty [Jolt Price Total ES* 1 Type 41A bituminous weer tours. TN 100 S 88. S $tom' 'v0 2 Class S went, base 7)4 140 S•'?O.&V S Jai CO Extension and 'unseat' preparation LS 1 around ptayground s 'ya s - 44 o0 Total Base Eid s f 7j,'7 4) Res / pn nt tl'uIy submitted, � /�/ "'" tT Ntmc !,7 A Carparsdon) ua svrtntss, , — — - s'C"" " (A parldmship) • Signer _.. _.. of P �''. _. _..�. Title 1 8 L041 Primed Nam of Signer A.>wPNp,.4gpro .t. Pen t BONES iKOO K95tMG RIVUtKL1K K l a 03!9361311 roTVV7vv - IN ?v l;p : v + i 7 V 4 )QV: cam: /meow f.IV Yt4 LL MN Pa g e ' ;tone Project Atp*& Agg PR* No: G14 ,eh Andel* q fl Cat/latices Par: 0 /T4M /NONE 7R4 wn {. • POW, Prepared By: IT Reim., pate: 4•1T'90I-if.v4awsagiftate S )11, ' Ai t Gairt M host d 9'wIlif a Z" so 1 , Meta% i� j w of emmer it :tat tile 'AO . g. c•NG Rr qt : a • l0' rfi�Frit1 me /, Molt O fmrC 11 wipe xx "77,t�c% '�"A • • 6194re SIT njNaf WOO uy(&B A N • c 3 A7' Lo�Tl.Aif mono 43 tnt SLUE, tw' 4 J 41 pot'o /Y. 9 • MEMO DATE : October 6, 2000 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE : Interim Use Permit for Centerville Redi -Mix Included in your packet is an interim use permit for Centerville Redi -Mix. The Council previously issued a one -year interim use permit for the Redi -Mix business that Dennis Shudy currently operates south of the Sheehy property on 21' Avenue. Council had indicated that the permit would be reviewed on an annual basis and could be extended on an annual basis for a period not to exceed five years. The current permit expires on October 14 2000. Mr. Shudy has requested that the permit be renewed. I am not aware of any complaints that have been issued about the operations of this business. The City has used this businesses services on a couple of occasions and it has been very beneficial to have access to cement right in the community. C ': te rvioee 1880 Main Street • Centerui(!e, MN 55038 E 257 STATE OF MINNESOTA (651) 429 -3232 • Fax (651) 429 -8629 COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF CENTERVILLE INTERIM SPECIAL USE PERMIT This Interim Special Use Permit is granted by the City of Centerville, Anoka County, Minnesota this 11 date of October, 2000, WHEREAS, Dennis Shudy ( "Permittee ") has applied for an Interim Special Use Permit for the purpose of conducting a redi -mix business of less than 4000 square feet within an Industrial District within the City of Centerville; and WHEREAS, such Interim Special Use Permit is required by Zoning Ordinance #4, Industrial District; and WHEREAS, after review the City Council has approved the granting of such Interim Special Use Permit for a period of one year commencing on October 14` 2000 and terminating on December 31, 2001. The said Interim Special Use Permit shall be subject to an annual administrative review during the term, in which Council has the option to remove the facility if so deemed. In addition, said Interim Special Use Permit shall be subject to the conditions set below: NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the redi -mix business has been granted an Interim Special Use Permit for operating a redi -mix business at 6985 — 21''` Avenue, Centerville, Minnesota. 2. That this Interim Special Use Permit is conditioned upon Zoning Ordinance #4, Division 200: Special Use Permits, Section 200- 020: Standards as mentioned in the following: a. The said business, shall be consistent with the general public and applicable specific objectives of the Comprehensive plan and all ordinances. b. The said business, will be harmonious and appropriate in the area. c. The said business, will not be hazardous or disturbing to neighboring uses. d. The said business, will not result in traffic congestion. • e. The said business, will not create excessive additional public expense. 3. In the event that the Permittee fails to comply with any of the terms and conditions set out herein or within the ordinances, or rule and regulations of the Sate of Minnesota, County of Anoka, City of' Centerville or any other governmental agency having jurisdiction over this project, the City Council shall have the right to immediately revoke the Interim Special Use Permit. Any and all costs incurred by the City, including reasonable attorney fees, in the event of default by Permittee in any of the terms, conditions, ordinances, or rules and regulations as provided above shall be the sole responsibility of the Permittee. 4. The Interim Special Use Permit shall be subject to annual review by the City of Centerville. In the event the activities conducted on such property are injurious to the public health, safety and/or welfare, the City Council may impose additional restrictions in the Interim Special Use Permit or revoke same. All conditions theretofore and hereinafter contained in the Interim Special Use Permit shall be binding upon any and all officers and managing agents of the Permittee, and any of their heirs, transferees or assignees. CITY OF CENTERVILLE Mayor Tom Wilharber Date Administrator Date Dennis Shudy Date MEMO DATE : October 6, 2000 TO : Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: Jim March RE : Ground Development Sketch Plan Included in your packet is a sketch plan from Ground Development for the property located south of the Center Oaks subdivisions. There is also some background information on the proposed subdivision and the company background. This item is for discussion purposes. VN /LL /uu fnl 14]u. r11A OIL 040 ,OCJ VAVUM/ JILT GLLrALpl Lill•. SVOU 'uvu GROUND DEVELOPMENT, INC. 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 25o GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55427 612.546.2625 ext. 11 facsimile 612 -546 -7921 September 29, 2000 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Centerville Centerville City Hall 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 -9794 Dear Commissioners: Thank you for taking time to review our new single family home development proposal and provide feedback on the sketch plan enclosed. This is a 54 acre parcel located along the east side of Centerville Road and south of the Center Oaks subdivision. The enclosed sketch plan represents a mbdure of lot sizes from 13,197 square feet to 41,980 square feet with an average of 19,833 square feet. We feel this Is an appropriate lot size mix due to buffer separation with the older Canter Oaks subdivision on the north boundary and the sensible use of upland while preserving the parcel's wetlands. In addition our design Includes provisions for extending the Centerville park trail system through the development, As part of your review and discussion, Ground Development would Ilke to speak about MUSA line issues. As means of further Introducing ourselves to the City of Centerville I wanted to provide you some additional background. QDI Is exclusively in the business of developing lots for single family homes. G.D,I. is owned by Steve Fiterman. Steve got started in the housing industry at a very young age through working for his dad who founded Miles Homes. In 1977 Steve developed his first piece of land in Brooklyn Center, which was a parcel owned by his family. Shortly thereafter G.D.1. was formed. During the ensuing period, Steve has platted over 1,500 single family lots In the Twin City metropolitan area, The communities that G.D.1, has worked In Includes: Blaine Rogers Brooklyn Center Rosemount Com Rapids Stillwater Independence Watertown Inver Grove Heights West Lakeland Lakeville Currently G.D.I. has plats In four cities which are being developed and marketed. The price of these lots range from first time home buyer lots to executive large lot estates. As you can tell, we have experience in all price ranges. 09/29/00 FRI 14:02 FAX 812 548 7321 GROtYNI) DEVELOPMENT INC. - W003 /005 Ground Development, Inc. (G01) Is a member of both the Sensible Land Use Coalition as wail as the Twin Cities Builder's Association - Developer's Council. We actively participate In both organizations. In summary, the strengths of Ground Development are I) our extensive experience and knowledge of the Industry, 11) our unique financial strength and 111) our focus and expertise in marketing. We look forward to working with the Planning and Zoning Commission, the City Council and City Staff in designing and approving a successful single family home development which we all can be proud. I would be very pleased to answer any other questions you might have. Sincerely, • Hanna Assistant Vice President Ground Development. Inc. co: S. Fiterman GDI vo. ce. eo ra�r •.. v .. ..... .... ... .. ... ............ ................... I t r _ — — fi N S ., ' e '• Ni m t LEI j .4 L 4 l ' i II �V ui•;, : ,' ro I V It . 1 . •: $i ei . 1. is \� n! "i ' ; ( , 1 Ny,. i4 V `, t INJ ` / - i n:.:,1 to vl 0..!; " t �^ f is l 1 i �i i i \ • J I U 4, '' "1.f i Ms . 4 1 14 N I s f 4 1 ! V�I4L , *! \ I 64 • ff , ♦I i s Ia g k Pirji 22,0 ::i s 1 . yp I 1 4)J6tp �. u ' ; y 1 il s G PLAN I R _ James R. till, Inc. 8 s e I 1 I4- { -1 a' " 4 ,, '1 l � ( " r 3 GROUND OCV�IOPIENT. WC. him,: /vaMas / wmtra. U8 /LN /UV Yril 14: V C.4d 01Z 040 1JL1 lntVl.w UC YLLUrAt!1 191.. - �QO]1uu0 Y W G 1 • i r il K ' Z e 1 . n a SS! 1111 rim .., --- peralt0 . r .... DP' la itteu It sir Mire sag =Kith.... . 4 ..., gig emer ...e4lign swim noldi I , rithhwa, ki i C o q .. a i .�0 ®0 lei NA align 0 , 01 Es n F ah NS I t '. • • 11 CPI la . eV - 4- — - - - WIS �aede 1 g„ B e ig a► James R. Hill, Inc. r z ■ MM. r Y. MM. ' e maaxa r�x � ..iw wn 1 y x.....��.. r..w. w POCIf 4+ roc aS}w« • GROUND DEVELOPMENT, INC. SEP 2 7 2000 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD SUITE 250 GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55427 612- 546 -2625 ext. 11 facsimile 612 - 546 -7321 September 25, 2000 Jim March City Administrator Centerville City Hall 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 -9794 Dear Mr. March: Thank you for taking time to talk with Steve Fiterman, Joel Cooper and myself this past Friday. We appreciated the opportunity to sit down and discuss the issues concerning the 54 acre parcel off Centerville Road. As you are aware we have an interest in developing this parcel into single family home community. We will be submitting to you by Thursday, September 28th a sketch plan of our lot design. As discussed we believe that a mixture of lot sizes 12;500 to 17, 500 would be appropriate due to the buffering and wetland issues this property has. As means of further introducing ourselves to the City of Centerville I wanted to provide you some additional background. GDI is exclusively in the business of developing lots for single family homes. G.D.I. is owned by Steve Fiterman. Steve got started in the housing industry at a very young age through working for his dad who founded Miles Homes. In 1977 Steve developed his first piece of land in Brooklyn Center, which was a parcel owned by his family. Shortly thereafter G.D.I. was formed. During the ensuing period, Steve has platted over 1,500 single family lots in the Twin City metropolitan area. The communities that G.D.I. has worked in includes: Blaine Rogers Brooklyn Center Rosemount Coon Rapids Stillwater Independence Watertown Inver Grove Heights West Lakeland Lakeville Currently G.D.I. has plats in four cities which are being developed and marketed. The price of these lots range from first time home buyer lots to executive large lot estates. As you can tell, we have experience in all price ranges. I joined Ground Development in 1999. My background includes 10 years working for a single family residential home builder as a manager providing customer service and coordinating materials purchase and delivery. 11 years as project manager for a major financial services company coordinating store development and construction. Most recently, I had 2 years experience doing site acquisition and zoning, working with over 45 Twin Cities communities. This background combined with Steve's twenty plus years of experience gives Ground Development extensive knowledge and experience in all aspects of residential development. Ground Development, Inc. (GDI) is a member of both the Sensible Land Use Coalition as well as the Twin Cities Builder's Association - Developer's Council. We actively participate in both organizations. In summary, the strengths of Ground Development are i) our extensive experience and knowledge of the industry, ii) our unique financial strength and iii) our focus and expertise in marketing. We Zook forward to working with you, Paul Palzer and the City Officials in designing and approving a successful single family home development which we all can be proud. Enclosed are marketing materials for GDI's other current developments. I would be very pleased to answer any other questions you might have. I will call you in the next week to confirm the receipt of our sketch plan and arrange for Planning and Zoning Commission feedback and review. Sincerely, T i4W. Hanna Assistant Vice President Ground Development, Inc. enclosures cc: S. Fiterman GDI W D W W _ r W CO 0 U N T LO O Z U) - Z c cc .. _ D O —I m Q w a �� cc Co E,., i z it o_ cc 2 a 2 cc >- Z co WLL, a-z cc 0 2 °•2 LU a _obis m CC W U Q a p z.4 `I- W CO W ❑ W cc- z m o z ° ° >o CC >" Z CO 5-j a. 0 F-- ! h- _ p t7 C d z o] a N _1 W _J CO O -I Cr . * 4: * 4c 0 0 CO hC'3 CO 0 _ Z.< W N I b z O O , M O CC LI £ O ai N Q til e m a tc 0 Q a E °� a q O Q A O 0 9 u C .. W w i G s W N y d O r a OM G t c N N �= d , V = o C Q w � a . , Q e = C 1n 4 wb v E Z t =! _ _ 6 ^ p 0. eV O V l e i E V V' LL • • • 636 0 W a co rn W W U Q� � U O = W� W o Q Z J � 0 -o <Wa W W Q � o co a o 4 0 Cl. 0. n o W w w D a a • 0 Q W U W Z (5 W Ill - o ° z a 1- _ cr W c cr ¢ o < a o < c o 0 4C lc * * 4: * 4c PAEENKOPF,CORNER _M M mwvw.n1 O a•x. f/a wen . u ALS GROUND DEVELOPMENT, INC. �.�bat 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY RD. #250 MARNE Idl.* n PH AMY At. M M Sr/Y.. Y. Se.Y.& Ports N See GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 ff° (4- t r ` e' SALES OFFICE (763) 546 -3151 I I an= 112220 C- 30.1 Ceafa F..; ,r° „_y . . 4, ter: I ' as.. 1 Id VC '/ I 1 i1 fso 1I F I 1 { 1� ! . ' I �, �gj 2 !! ja t y Ganef ) ? 7 it 4 r „- ? /-4, -9 .., L 4 200012711 F. ,, : \\*V.:4/i>” Onalego At/ I 11 R WARREN WA I ° �¢,q+ - j t \ �!' €Z • savwsefaeesy ! ' !- ' 8 .ft 1 strain 267-12 , <• 0 . . 1 7 �' � /A \� : 3 .I as saI I fs `.. N ! , f V • _ ,t4q d ; ''b, , r n 2 °I V r iii I ' . ` � ' 8 s N i b � i , i �. `. E I i 4 i r, ` �,... — k k I 5 1 r J" 00 .0' 1 1 � I I a r $�O ' ! ' 1 1 1 8 1 r 1 / . 7 I YX 1 i/ ..- 4 i b' T 1 / ! /y- 1 ? 1 �'°! ' !! A°' 1 ` I � h 6 / r 1 A '--W- 10^o R I I fpgJj1I ! I r,,,PS i {� 9� .'' � � ` 1 8 1 1— � ! �, � / 6 8 l > 1 / I V LLL ,. .1 ...1° ... 1 wa°orort .. 7 / /' 41 54152 1 X ` \\ I & ' / 1 e 1 C, wonP�pr�l a. I / !' I Y a If IS i A . 44 L• e A - I / / Or c) 9 ar so , >3�! I \ . t \ I 1 � � pia \`l�l`I ix / aril ` Yes firma 27212 } .1U.I I. PAGENKOPF sin-rat rams ROAD R 7+or~, \ n. a_____ _ .. IbJ __ /32251 — I la l w.rWF (pAl mewl at .- Y N M S 1 4 0 5 .e II 1 � IW . rWSr, l/.%": W .1 it. NS I 1 S I%, a /Sec IL tt4w t. FOR MORE INFORMATION CALL LARRY AT 763 - 546 -3151 • PAGENKOPF CORNER PRELIMINARY PLAT II 7 : x:11► , \ \ 1 �IIH� -�,+ �.i. �. • 1 I i d ` r i ,,,, %. 1 „ 1 li lb: 1 i .. 4 . 1.. , „cf.,- - 1 , , IS. 1 ii . I \ Nittlit":411pr"." ail.- I lit . 1 fi , i 1 - -- v \\ � .i ce 1 1 ...,n;;;W I NI � ♦�. . i ?A �� Al _ III 1 - 47 4 0 . N.) :4 ., ' ft. P t. I ` 26 c I `} _°'s III ' \ i 1 I •- /71tir i . FREW .1/4 • 7 til i li II II 1 I � • Ij 1 . I . d i . , cat I l- — 1: �: ' I .v ' ns.-w ', • 1 ' ©a a. Ac :r te - I IV. i *Hi" a Ac � ` \ i 1 i ! e 1. I - mad \\ 1 i „L.: rIag AH . ti . 'ES': C / . — Ili 1..- ir re....- ti d * ROUND DEVELOPMENT, INC. GOLDEN VALLEYLM NN R5 55427 #250 FOR MORE INFORMATION CALL SALES OFFICE (763) 546 -3151 LARRY AT 763 -546 -3151 1 • SUMMARY OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS FOR PAGENKOPF CORNER THIS IS INTENDED ONLY TO SERVE AS A SUMMARY OF THE COVENANTS. THERE ARE RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED IN THE COVENANTS WHICH ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SUMMARY. TO THE EXTENT THAT THIS SUMMARY CONFLICTS WITH THE ACTUAL COVENANTS, THE COVENANTS CONTROL. IF YOU DO 1 NOT HAVE A COPY, YOU SHOULD OBTAIN A COPY OF THE COVENANTS. Type of House Each house shall be a single family residence, not exceeding two stories in height when measured from the front of the house. Driveways Driveways shall be a minimum of 12 feet in width and shall be constructed of brick, concrete, pavers or bituminous within 12 months of occupancy. Lots 6 and 7 share an entrance. Garage All homes shall have an attached garage with space tor two, three or four cars. This restriction shall not preclude an attached garage from being two stalls deep nor shall it preclude any storage areas incorporated into the lower level of the home not visible from the street. House Design The design shall exhibit more architectural merit, continuity, and distinction than found in conventional single family residential developments. Major attention shall be given t o trim, window placement, siding material, and garage door detail. All building plans shall be reviewed first by the Declarant. All exterior colors shall be natural or earth tones with approval by the Declarant. The area around the house (as defined in the covenants) shall be sodded. Each house shall have a minimum of $500.00 in landscaping and foundation shrubs installed in front of each home as screening for the foundation. The landscaping shall be completed within seven months of a certificate of occupancy being issued for the house. Easements Within the trail, utility and drainage easements on the plat no structures, plantings or other materials shall be placed so they may interfere with the purpose of the easement. Outside Storage No recreational vehicle, non- operative automobile, trailer, boat, snowmobile, fish house, fire wood, vehicle in excess of 9,000 pounds or structure of a temporary character shall be kept or stored outside of a building or garage. Fences No fences shall be constructed or located in the front yard. All other fences must conform t o the covenants. Animals No animals, livestock or poultry of any kind shall be raised, bred or kept on any lot except that dogs, cats or other household pets provided that they are not kept, bred or maintained for any commercial purpose. Accessory Buildings Only one storage, accessory building or shed shall be permitted on any lot providing that it; does not exceed 480 square feet, is not located within any setback area, is constructed of the same material and of the same color as the home and has an asphalt shingle roof and is of the same design as the house. Antennas Satellite dishes shall be permitted provided they don't extend 6 feet above the roof, are less than 36 inches in diameter and are screened from roadways and neighbors. Mailboxes Mailboxes shall be provided in a cluster configuration as approved by the City and the Post Office. Agricultural Area Some of the properties abutting this community are active agricultural areas. The City of Independence has passed an ordinance stating that certain agricultural operations do not constitute a nuisance, Enforcement Any person with a legal or equitable interest in the property subject to this Declaration including the City of Independence shall have the right to enforce all covenants. The Declarant shall not be required t o enforce the Covenants. Ci C in E r. v, d ¢ F, Z N b! AA`` w x Y W \ a i E � N //�� W u ZZ a. tY 6 • OUilOT A - - - - _ \ 5 4 1 � 8 .,. q I 1w — ��\ —.-. , 3 2 •�w 7 6 5 €p ...�:.. 2 J'' __ _— STREETA 3 ' #P =:Fr _., 8 3 5 4 a ?., ° � STREET B_ _� w„.,.. 4 fig ° . 111111,1111 / as:4ig. §1 1 10 11 12 ii l_ 1 Y 1 xcn um ,.. aan.wo / - 4 .... 5 6 V OU1l0T B `JJSa55 8 N 6 p Know ------ STREET F /1 25 DUPRE ROAD >.?.. 26 16 / 16 15 14 13 12 1O 9 B mu u ci = 23 •m .. my. m« z 30. E Z7 29 2 .0 s w rio 1 28 / 1� V �7 —REE7 D �- 2 1 's W E W 33 w , �, 2Q –, 18 ex A 35 37 38 V 34 1 .. li CC g MOO 17 .n4 Li 19 20 21 4 —w . r M4 1. 40 - • ` STREET E il ( . 45 42 / 3 R 6 66 5 44 4 ., 4 SITE DATA X510` ] w 3 2 1 NUMBER OF LOTS 88 �_ _ _ _ -------- ...,.. V MINIMUM LOT SIZE 13,197 S.F �— 5... FEET DRAWN BY u {w 200 300 LARGEST LOT 41,980 S.F ass AVERAGE LOT SIZE 19,833 S.F. DATA 1 nth - 100 leek B / /ao REVISIONS • BOOK/PAGE CAD FILE 20237CP PROJECT NO 20237 FILE NO SHEET 1 OF 1 . V C En w S d Sia I Ylna!naYiS� r c ra$ v�y� y 'Raw mum VA 0 re; ° � e x g. tau : . �i/ 4 : 9 0 0 ** m $ a, p y ir_i n , ;: : . �� `�` 1 gi g Pal A� ©1� " d • ; s i g MI 1, , II " 13 14 If WI 17 1 1 NW 17 N l i ; I I i Eli 1 pp a irr ■0 ■� .. _ Pi ph • 7 , .. iilli a 112 re NI 4 1 2 3 • 1 . ai r 4 0 pi a all la H 21 N— ; • ,. i i /1 DRAWN BY �' RSS \ :,, tag TF24" Nor IP „ \ i c.) r Al t ; ± - ' a I REVISIONS ...ttn BOOK/PAGE SCALE IN FEET 0 400 800 1200 CAD FILE 20238CP Ism um no 1 inch = 400 feet PROJECT NO. 20238 FILE NO. SHEET 1 OF 1 BASE MAP PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE ' Page 1 of 2 J im March To: Wayne LeBlanc; Theresa Brenner; Tom Peterson; Tim Rehbine; Ray Devine; Michelle Moser; Lori Dorn; John McLean; Jim Hoeft; Hanna Tilsen; Brian Hanson; Patricia Scott; Elizabeth Scheller, Doug Porter; Dave Kilian; Mary Capra; Aimee Fairbrother; City Council Subject: Week in Review Week in Review September 29, 2000 Building Permits this Period = 3 Building Permits YTD = 139 New Homes Year to Date = 38 * Eagle Trucking has vacated the office area of the new public works building. The public works department will start moving into the offices on Monday. We are continuing to clean up the junk around the old public works site. Plans are being made to ask City permission to relocate the Lion's storage shed to the new public works site to try to further the downtown clean up efforts. * I spoke to the attomey representing Cy Sheehy this morning. Mr. Sheehy is willing to donate 15 acres in the industrial park to the City. I indicated to Mr. Sheehy's attorney that the City Council has indicated a willingness to accept the donation. 1 also mentioned that the City would be interested in looking at obtaining a trail easement across the remaining five acres that Mr. Sheehy would like to keep around his existing building. This twenty acre parcel is located just south of the developed industrial area (Goetz, Northern Forest Products etc.) between 20th and 21st Avenue. If we obtained this fifteen acres of land, we would have the future trail linkage area secured to traverse the land between 20th and 21st Avenue. This would be consistent with our long term trail plan to connect to the City of Hugo. This property is mostly wetland with upland around the perimeter. The property has much potential for recreational uses. This could also be a site for a future watertower. There has been an interest expressed by a local business owner to purchase a portion of this property from the City, if we accept the proposed donation. There also exists the possibility of banking wetland credits on this site as a potential revenue stream. This exciting development will be discussed at the next Council and October committee meetings. * There was a great visioning meeting held on Monday of this week at City Hall. The entire park and recreation committee was in attendance along with representatives from Anoka County, Washington County, Lino Lakes, Hugo, St. Paul Water Utility and the Rice Creek Snowmobile Association. Wayne LeBlanc has drafted a summary of the meeting and is working to revise the comprehensive trail vision. The proposed Sheehy property donation 9/29/00 Yage2of2 works right into these plans. Thank you to Wayne and P +R for your efforts in this area. * I am currently developing develo in a five year capital improvement plan and capital equipment plan using the specialized software called Plan -It. I had a meeting this week with the gentleman that designed this software. It works great. Mr. Leskee developed the software in 1999 and it is already installed in over 50 cities in our area ranging in size from 1300 population to over 100,000. 1 will be bringing this tool to the committees and the Council so that we can customize my draft plan. This tool will make our goal and objectives way of strategic planning a thing of the past. This software also creates great customized reports. I believe everyone will be pleased with this software's capabilities. * Seven new members were voted in to the Lion's Club last evening. We are beginning planning for a concession /shelter building in LaMotte Park. Lion's Night Golf is scheduled for October 20th. Contact Bill at Kelly's for more info. Half of the spots are already filled. The annual Haunted House and City -wide bonfire is scheduled for October 26, 27 and 28. The bonfire will be on Saturday. Contact Ray Devine for more info. on this item. * Enjoy your weekend and another Vikings victory! 9/29/00 Page 1 of 2 Jim March To: Wayne LeBlanc; Theresa Brenner, Tom Peterson; Tim Rehblne; Ray Devine; Michelle Moser; Lori Dom; John McLean; Jim Hoeft; Hanna Tilsen; Brian Hanson; Patricia Scott; Elizabeth Scheller, Doug Porter; Dave Italian; Mary Capra; Aimee Fairtxother; City Council Subject: Week in Review Week in Review October 6, 2000 Building Permits this Period = 3 Building Permits YTD =142 New Homes Year to Date = 40 * Ballfield lights from the Waterworks former ballfieid were donated to the City and have been moved and installed at one of the ballfields at LaMotte Park. Mr. DeFoe is also donating the scoreboard from his field to the City. * The temporary mobile banking facility for the County Bank was moved on to their lot on Wednesday. They plan to have the mobile building anchored to the ground and will begin operations in the temporary facility within the next couple of weeks. * Curb and gutter has been installed in the Hunter's Crossing subdivision. Asphalt base is planned for the next couple of weeks. * The public works department has moved in to their new offices. Hydrants were also flushed throughout the City this week. * Two quotes were received for the paving of the path at Acom Creek Park including the path around the playground equipment. Arcade Asphalt quoted $10,000 and Northdale Construction quoted a little over $17,000. Arcade Asphalt will be paving the trail after Council approves the quote on Wednesday. * The company from Iowa that is building the ladder truck for the fire department e- mailed a picture of the new vehicle. Delivery is scheduled for next week. * The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed a sketch plan for the former Gor -em property south of Center Oaks. They are proposing an 88 lot subdivision on approximately 55 acres. The Planning Commission provided many comments on the proposed subdivision. Ground Development is the name of the company interested in the property. The average size of the proposed lots is a little over 19,000 square feet. * A Council workshop was held Wednesday evening. We discussed the 2001 budget and 10/6/00 ro _ began discussions of prioritizing projects that were proposed in a draft five year Capital Improvement Plan. Have a good weekend and enjoy the snowflakes! 10/6/00 NOT APPROVED PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES October 4, 2000 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Parks and Recreation Committee of the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on October 4, 2000 at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. Chairperson Doug Porter called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. Present: Chairperson Doug Porter Wayne LeBlanc Karla DeVine Tedd Peterson Brian Walter Terry Sweeney (Council Liaison) Absent: Staff: Jill Lien Jim March (brief appearance) APPEARANCES Mike Quigley, Gor -Em Development — Eagle Park Sport / Tennis Court Ms. Lien explained that after contacting Mr. Quigley earlier that day, he informed her that he would not be able to attend the Parks and Recreation Meeting that evening. Mr. Quigley faxed a letter to the Parks and Recreation Committee expressing his intentions regarding the completion of the park in the Eagle Pass sub - division. Mr. Quigley is currently evaluating the area required for the court to determine the possibility of providing a regulation tennis court, as well as an additional smaller court area to be used for a basketball area. Mr. Quigley is relying on the Parks and Recreation Committee's knowledge of the recreational needs of the area to be the determining factor. The consensus of the Parks and Recreation Committee was to determine if there is enough space for both a regulation size tennis court, and a sport court. The committee made the following motion: Motion by Mr. LeBlanc, seconded by Mr. Walter to have Mr. Peterson and Mr. Porter and any other available Parks and Recreation Committee Members, go to Eagle Park on Friday, October 6, 2000 at 4:00 p.m. to look at the park layout and to decide the feasibility of: 1) a regulation size tennis court, surface, fence and a separate sport court; 2) tennis court alone; and 3) sport court alone. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 1 The committee requested Ms. Lien contact Mr. Quigley to inform him of the Parks and Recreation Committee's intentions. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES September 6. 2000 Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes Motion by Ms. DeVine, seconded by Mr. Peterson to approve the September 6, 2000 Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes with noted addition. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS Proposed Trail Map Discussion Tabled Informational Meeting for Skate Park / BMX Track for Parents and Youth The committee discussed the "sample" flyers presented by Ms. Lien along with possible dates and times to consider, and made the following motion: Motion by Mr. Porter, seconded by Mr. Walter to have Ms. Lien distribute the flyer to Centennial Middle School and Centerville Elementary School, to accept any printing costs, and to publish the meeting in the LeJournal and the Quad Community Press. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Turf Update (Laurie LaMotte Park) Mr. Peterson explained that he spoke with Valley Creek, regarding aerating the soil at Laurie LaMotte Park. During their discussion, Mr. Peterson learned that Valley Creek was already planning on aerating the soil at City Hall. Valley Creek was willing to aerate the soil at Laurie LaMotte Park for $27.50 per hour (approximately six hours). After the aeration had been complete, Mr. Peterson learned that Valley Creek spent two (2) days aerating the soil at LaMotte Park. Due to the fact that the soil was so hard, they had to aerate it twice. Even though Valley Creek spent two (2) days at LaMotte Park, they only charged the City for six (6) hours of labor. Tree Placement at Parks — Maps Mr. Porter had visited the parks prior to the meeting to sketch out each of the parks existing trees. The committee elected to roughly "plot out" the placement of the 20 Autumn Blaze Maple trees that Mr. Goetz is currently holding for the City. There will be four (4) trees planted at both Royal Meadows and Tracie McBride Parks, and seven (7) trees planted at both Acorn Creek and Laurie LaMotte Parks. Eagle Park will not receive any of the Autumn Blaze trees. Mr. Porter will contact Mr. Goetz regarding the installation ot; and any suggestions he may have related to the trees and/or their surroundings. 2 Motion by Ms. DeVine, seconded by Mr. Peterson to authorize Mr. Porter to work with Mr. Goetz regarding the placement and installation of the 20 Autumn Blaze Maple trees at the parks. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mat= Mai= of Parks / Police Grant Mr. LeBlanc explained that he had contacted Chief Heckman regarding the possibility of any type of grant funds being offered by the Police Department for lighting of parks. Unfortunately, Chief Heckman was unaware of any such grant. YMCA Update Ms. DeVine mentioned that she had contacted Craig Bode of the YMCA to learn why the Summer Youth Programs were not offered at Laurie LaMotte Park as planned. Mr. Bode explained that 25 registrations were needed in order to hold the classes and only 6 — 8 were received. Bill Bisek's "Recreational Activity Director" Proposal Update Mr. Sweeney explained the City Councils reactions to Mr. Bisek's proposal of becoming the City's "Recreational Activity Director ". The Council felt it was great that someone is willing to offer activities for both adults and youth, but the opportunity should be open for all businesses within the community, not just one. In addition, both the Council and the Parks and Recreation Committee expressed financial concerns about a local business owner offering recreational activities through the City. The Parks and Recreation Committee made the following motion: Motion by Mr. Porter, seconded by Mr. Walter to request that Mr. March write a Letter to Mr. Bisek regarding City sponsored leagues vs. privately sponsored leagues, indicating that the Parks and Recreation Committee will not sponsor any privately organized leagues through the City. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. The general consensus of the Parks and Recreation Committee is to research the needs, qualifications, pay, and responsibilities of Park Directors / Coordinators in the surrounding communities. Mr. Porter will contact the University of Minnesota to explore the possibilities of obtaining a paid intern with a degree in Parks and Recreation. Mr. Porter will also contact Jim Hoeft (City Attorney) to discuss any liabilities involved, and Barry Bernstein (Lino Lakes Recreation Program Supervisor) to discuss all of the issues, concerns, pros and cons involved with a Park Director / Coordinator. Future Trails Meeting Update Mr. LeBlanc explained the meeting held on Monday, September 25 was a great success. The entire Parks and Recreation Committee along with representatives from Anoka County, Washington County, Lino Lakes, Hugo, St. Paul Water Utility and the Rice Creek Snowmobile Association were in attendance. All parties involved came together to form a general vision of the future trail systems. Mr. LeBlanc will update the proposed trail map and bring it to the November meeting. 3 Remaining Balance of the Parks and Recreation Budget Ms. Lien distributed an updated balance sheet provided by Ms. Bender indicating the total assets, total expenditures and total funds/balance remaining in the Parks and Recreation accounts. Mr. March explained the Capitol Improvement Projects, indicating he would like the Parks and Recreation Committee to prioritize the list included and any other projects they feel important. Mr. March also explained the increases in the budgeted amounts. The Capitol Improvement Projects packet of information was for informational purposes only at this time, with the exception of prioritizing. The final budget is due in December. The Parks and Recreation Committee elected to visit all of the parks in Centerville on Saturday, October 28, 2000 at 8:30 a.m. to determine the goals of each park, and then to have a workshop at City Hall to discuss the entire Parks and Recreation Budget for the year 2001. The committee requested Ms. Lien notify the LeJournal and the Quad Community Press. Laurie LaMotte Park Lighting Mr. Peterson explained the light poles donated by Mr. DeFoe have all been relocated except for one that is currently being used on Mr. DeFoe's property. In addition to the donation of the light poles, Mr. DeFoe offered the scoreboard to the City. Mr. Peterson mentioned that the actual cost of the relocation would be slightly higher than previously quoted due to the additional expense of relocating the scoreboard. NEW BUSINESS Letter from Bert Casper Regarding a Trail Between Oiibway Road and Heritage Street Mr. Bert Casper (6979 Eagle Trail) e- mailed Mr. March requesting a trail be paved where a path currently exists between the dead -end of Heritage Street (on the east side of Centerville Road) and the curve on Ojibway Road. The consensus of the committee was to write a Letter to Mr. Casper thanking him for his interest in a possible trail and to notify him that this will be discussed in the future. Hunter's Crossing Bituminous Trail / Acorn Creek Park Trail Mr. Tom Peterson (City Engineer) had sent a letter to Mr. Rick Carlson (Hunter's Crossing developer) regarding the bituminous trails in both the Hunter's Crossing Development and the trail around the playground equipment at Acorn Creek Park. In addition, were bids from two (2) vendors for paving the trail around the play structure, and a map of the park indicating the proposed work. The lowest quote of $10,000 was from Arcade Asphalt, a local contractor from Centerville. The second quote of $17,347 was from Northdale Construction (Hunter's Crossing contractor). Motion by Mr. Walter, seconded by Ms. DeVine to recommend to City Council the acceptance of the bid from Arcade Asphalt in the amount of $10,000 for paving the trail at Acorn Creek Park as indicated. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 4 Sheehy Land Donation Ms. Lien explained that Mr. Cy Sheehy is willing to donate land located in the Industrial Park area just behind Goetz Landscape and Northern Forest Products between 20 and 21' Avenues to the City. It is currently a 20 -acre parcel in which Mr. Sheehy would like to donate 15 -acres of As indicated in Mr. March's Week in Review, if the City obtained this 15- acres, we would have the future trail linkage area secured to traverse, and would be consistent with the long -term trail plan to connect to the City of Hugo. The property has a high potential for recreational uses, and could also be a site for a fixture water tower. In addition, a local business owner has expressed his interest in purchasing or renting a portion of this property from the City, if we accept the proposed donation. This was presented to the Parks and Recreation Conunittee for informational purposes only at this time. Capitol Improvement Projects Discussed previously. Ground Development Concept Plan The committee discussed the proposed Ground Development Concept Plan for the property located just south of the Center Oaks Development. Ground Development is proposing 17,500 square foot minimum lots. The committee was not in favor of the proposed Ground Development Concept Plan as presented. DISCUSSION ITEMS Parks and Recreation's Monthly Report to Patricia Scott (LeJournal) The committee directed Ms. DeVine to focus most of the monthly Parks and Recreation update on the Skate Park / BMX Track Informational meeting to be held on Thursday, October 26, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. Motion by Mr. Porter, seconded by Mr. Peterson to adjourn the October 4, 2000 Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Jill Lien Staff Liaison 5