HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-12-04 Minutes r
PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING
THURSDAY - DECEMBER 4, 1984
PRESENT: Walter Prachar, Chairman Kathy Welk
Dan Tourville Bob Lindgren
Mel Dupre
ABSENT: Bob LaMotte Elmer Murray
Chairman Prachar called the meeting to order at 7:25 P.M.
Discussion on Parking Ordinance #16. Motion by Tourville,
second by Welk to amend Ordinance #16 to read as follows:
No vehicle except that of an emergency vehicle, shall be
parked between 3:oo A.M. to 7:00 A.M. o'clock, and no
vehicle shall in any case be parked upon any street in
any one place for a longer continuous period than 24 hours,
motion carried.
Clerk will get examples of animal ordinances from the League
of Minnesota Cities.
Motion by Tourville, second by Welk to table discussion
on an animal ordinance until the next meeting when they
will have more information on what other cities are doing,
motion carried.
Resignation letters received by the Planning and Zoning
Committee from Robert LaMotte and Walter Prachar. Copy
of letters included and made a part of these minutes.
Clerk will check with the council to see why Sunrise Plastics
needs a special use permit, and what restrictions the council
would like to see placed on the company.
Clerk will check with the council on a small block house
that's been built on the city street running by Barrots.
Motin by Dupre, second by Lindgren to adjourn, motion
carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:10 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra Gonsior
Clerk
Planning and Zoning
November 14, 1984
Page Three
At this time (8:25 P.M.) the Board took a five minute break.
GROUP W CABLE - VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, METES & BOUNDS CONVEYANCE
Mr. Steve Nierengarten and Mr. Zurek were representing Group W in
their request to purchase a ten acre parcel to be used for the
purposes of cable TV, which would include construction of one 150'
antenna (which would be a conditional use) and two 22' diameter
dishes on grade.
Group W's selection of the site on Birch Street (just behind the
present tower) was made because of its central location to the area
to be serviced (Lino Lakes, Circle Pines, Lexington and Centerville).
They have researched several sites which resulted in several conflicts
including "noisy" air space, improper zoning, etc.
The problem with the site in question is the fact that it does not
have the frontage to meet ordinance requirements. Group W felt that
the problem of access has been taken care of even though the land
in question does not have necessary frontage.
■
Mr. Cody moved that the application of Group W for a metes and bounds
subdivision for certain property legally described on the application
be denied due to the fact that the property does not have the 330'
frontage as required by the City ordinance. Motion seconded by Mrs.
Klaus,
Mr. Goldade asked if there would be a time restriction which would
not allow Group W to reapply, possibly with a different site, until
a certain period of time had elapsed. It was the understanding of
the Board that there is no such time restriction which would apply
to this situation and that Group W could return as soon as they
wish with another request. Mr. McLean reminded Group W representa-
tives that the P & Z Board was a recommending body and that the
City Council would take the final action to accept or deny the
request. On voting on the motion, Mr. Prokop and Mr. Goldade voted
nay, Mr. McLean, Mrs. Klaus and Mr. Cody voted aye. Motion carried.
NEW BUS _
Mr. McLean reported that he had received a phone call from Mr. Larry
Brokke who owns a parcel of land partially in Lino Lakes and partially
in Centerville. Mr. Brokke has been notified that Centerville is
considering changing the zoning classification of his land in Center-
ville, and he is concerned about this devaluating his property. Mr.
Brokke did not request any particular action be taken, although Mr.
McLean felt that the City should be involved as a service to a'Lino
Lakes citizen., Mr. McLean told Mr. Brokke that he would bring the
item to the attention of the Building Inspector and the City Admin-
istrator and felt that the City Administrator should look into the
problem.
Subd. 16. "LI" Light Industrial District.
(1) Purpose. These areas have the prerequisites for industrial
development, but because of proximity to residential areas or the
need to protect certain areas or uses from adverse influences,
high development standards will be necessary. "LI" uses include
service industries and industries which manufacture, fabricate,
assemble or store, where the process is not likely to create
offensive noise, vibrations, dust, heat, smoke, odor, glare, or
other objectionable influences. Generally, these include whole-
sale, service and light industries which are dependent upon raw
materials refined elsewhere.
(2) Lot and Yard Requirements.
(A) - Minimum district size: 3 acres
(B) Minimum lot size: 1 acre
(C) Minimum lot width: 150 feet
(D) Setbacks:
(1) Front: 50 feet
(ii) Rear: 15 feet
(iii) Side (interior lot line): 10 feet
(iv) Side (corner lot): 50 feet
(v) Side and rear (accessory building except corner lot):
111 10 feet
(vi) From residential district: 75 feet
(vii) Side and rear (parking lots): 5 feet
(3) Height Regulations. No building in the LI District shall be
erected or structurally altered to exceed 45 feet.
(4) Building Coverage. The maximum amount of a site which may be
: r covered by buildings is 40 percent.
(5) Green Area. The minimum site area to be left to open space,
yard, and /or landscaped area: 10 percent.
•
(6) Buffer. Where a side or rear lot line in an L -1 District coincides
with an adjacent Residential or Commercial District, or public
, I l road right -of -way, a landscape buffer area shall be provided along
such side or rear lot line not less than 40 feet in depth and shall
\ contain landscaping, planting, ber ming or other effective
0 ( J screening suitable to provide an effective 50 percent screen.
1 100