Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-02-06 Minutes Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the CIty of Centerville held a public hearing on February 6, 1990 at City Hall. The purpose of the hearing was to hear all persons present regarding the possibility of amending Ordinance #4, Section 71.35 LOT WIDTH OF - now reads: The mean width measured at right angles to the depth. amend to read: The horizontal distance between side lot lines measured at the building setback line. Chairman Tourville called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m. Present: Drilling, Welk, Wilharber, liaison Pelton. Absent: Vermeulen. Chairman Tourville summarized the proposed amendment to Ordinance #4, Section 71.35 to the Commission members and people in the audience. Chairman Tourville expressed the reason for this amendment was to clarify some of the language in the amendment. No members of the audience made any comments on the proposed amendment. No members of the Commission made comments on the proposed amendment. Motion by Drilling, second by Welk to adjourn the Public Hearing, motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 7:14 p.m. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Centerville held their regular meeting on February 6, 1990 at City Hall. Chairman Tourville called the meeting to order at 7:15 p.m. Present: Welk, Drilling, Wilharber, liaison Pelton. Absent: Vermeulen. Motion by Welk, second by Wilharber to accept the meeting minutes of the January 4, 1990 meeting, motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS: AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE #4. SECTION 71.35 Discussion on the proposed amendment to Ordinance #4, Section 71.35 LOT, WIDTH OF - took place between members of the Commission and members of the audience. Some concern was expressed if this would effect corner lots, and the width at the rear lot line. Tamara Miltz- Miller, Clerk /Administrator, was present and explained that lots still must meet square footage requirements. This proposed amendment would be in conjunction with Ordinance #8 - Odd Shaped Lots. L P &Z ETING MINUTES NUTES I FEBRUARY 6, 1990 PAGE TWO John Stewart, City Engineer, was also present and noted that Ordinance #8, Section 25.02 states that the rear lot line is not to be less than 50 feet. Motion by Wilharber, second by Drilling to recommend to the City Council approval of the amendment to Ordinance #4, Section 71.35 LOT, WIDTH OF - as proposed: now reads: The mean width measured at right angles to the depth. amend to read: The horizontal distance between side lot lines measured at the building setback line. motion carried unanimously. PROPOSED AMENDMENT OT ORDIANANCE #8. SUBDTVTSTON PLATS 43.03 -6 Discussion on the proposed amendment to Ordinance #8, Subdivision Plats 43.03 -6 now reads: Layout of lots, including dimensions, square footage, numbers, building setback lines or front yard lines; location and widths of easements; amend to read: Layout of lots, including dimensions, square footage, numbers, front yard lines, building setback lines on odd shaped lots; location and widths of easements. Chairman Tourville summarized the proposed amendment to Ordinance #8, Subdivision Plats 43.03 -6. Discussion took place as to whether or not odd shaped lots was a clear definition. It appeared to be the general consensus of the Commission that odd shaped lots was not very defined. Commission member Welk suggested changing odd shaped lots to non - rectangular lots. John Stewart, City Engineer, was also in the opinion that non - rectangular would be better than odd shaped or irregular shaped lots. r P &Z MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 6, 1990 PAGE THREE Motion by Welk, second by Drilling to recommend to the City Council to amend Ordinance #8, Subdivision Plats 43.03 -6 - now reads: Layout of lots, including dimensions, square footage, numbers, building setback lines or front yard lines; location and widths of easements; amend to read: Layout of lots, including dimensions, square footage, numbers, front yard lines, building setback line on non - rectangular shaped lots; locations and widths of easements. motion carried unanimously. CENTERVTJ,J,F RESIDENTTAJ, DEVELOPMENT GUIDE Discussion of the Centerville Residential Development Guide. It appeared to be the general consensus of the Commission that it would be a good Guide to have for prospective developers to look at. It also appeared to be the general consensus of the Commission to have the pages dated, as to insure that the most current copy is available. Motion by Wilharber, second by Drilling to accept the concept of the Centerville Residential Development Guide with the addition of dating the pages as to insure that current copies are available, motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS: CENTERHILT, DFVET,OPMENRT - PROPOSED SRETCH PLAN Discussion on the sketch plan for the proposed Centerhill Development. Gerald Rehbein, developer of the proposed Centerhill Development was present. Mr. Rehbein noted that this development would be completed in three phases, with the first phase being North of the Hardwood Pond Estates II development. Centerhill Phase I would be R2A, with 27 lots. Commission member Welk questioned Mr. Rehbein what his intentions for park dedication would be. Mr. Rehbein expressed that Park and Recreation Committee could have money for park dedication. Liaison Pelton noted that Park and Recreation committee would like land in the North East corner for ballfields, ice rinks, ect. P &Z MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 6, 1990 PAGE FOUR Chairman Tourville questioned as to what plans there would be for trails. Commission member Wilharber noted that Brian Drive would have sidewalks on one side of the street, and would like to see sidewalks on the East /West collector street in the Centerhill Development. Chairman Tourville asked if there were any plans for a holding pond in this development, since there are not any included on the sketch plan presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Rehbein noted that the first phase of this proposed development could drain into the pond located in the Hardwood Ponds Estates. Phases II and III of this proposed development could drain into the proposed Acorn Creek Development. John Stewart, City Engineer, was also present and noted that a Drainage Plan for the City can establish holding ponds. He is of the opinion that little holding ponds do not do anything for you, it would be more efficient to collect in one holding pond before discharging into Clearwater Creek. He also advised that the City is awaiting comments from Rice Creek Water Shed on Centerville's Comprehensive Water Plan. Mr. Stewart also noted that if Phase II and III of the proposed Centerhill development drain into the proposed Acorn Creek Development, should not create a problem. In previous sketch plans for the Acorn Creek Development, three to four acres are already shown as holding ponds. Tamara Miltz- Miller, Clerk /Administrator, was present and expressed that it was not appropriate at this time to discuss the drainage concerns until the Planning and Zoning, and City Council have time to review the Storm Drainage Master Plan. Ms. Miltz- Miller recommends to wait on any further discussion until the Storm Drainage Master Plan has been reviewed by Rice Creek Water Shed and their comments are available. Mr. Rehbein also noted that his plans have to be review by Rice Creek Water Shed for approval. Commission member Welk expressed concern with Lot 6, and Lot 3, Block 6 in Phase III in relation to some of the lot lines. She would like to see the issues of drainage and ponding discussed more. Commission member Drilling felt that the sketch plan appeared to be good. Commission member Drilling also expressed concern over drainage. Commission member Wilharber also expressed that this appeared to be a good sketch plan, but would like to have holding ponds addressed, and if Park and Recreation Committee was in agreement he had no objections. r P &Z MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 6, 1990 PAGE FIVE Liaison Pelton expressed the opinion that she would like to see pedestrian easement from Fox Run to the Park property. Mr. Rehbein stated that this had been already addressed, with a 10 foot easement on the Hardwood Pond Plat. Motion by Wilharber, second by Drilling to recommend to the City Council the action recommended in City Engineer's letter dated January 30, 1990, page two, item number three: Planning Commission a) Considers sketch plan; b) Recommends Council orders preparation of Feasibility Study; c) Engineering escrow for P.C. and Plat Rev. motion carried unanimously. APPLICATION FOR REZONTNG - PROPOSED CENTERRTT,T DEVELOPMENT Discussion on Gerald Rehbein's rezoning request for the Centerhill Development. The proposed rezoning would be for R2A south of the proposed East /West collector street, and for R2 north of the proposed East /West collector street, as per his sketch plan. Motion by Drilling, second by Wilharber to hold a public hearing at the March 6, 1990 Planning and Zoning meeting on the proposed rezoning per Gerald Rehbein's request, motion carried unanimously. POSSTBT.E CREATTON OF AN R -5 ZONING DTSTRTCT Discussion on the possibility of creating a R5 Zoning District. City Council member Burgstahler was present. Mr. Burgstahler expressed that for implementation of Centerville's Comprehensive plan there is a need for the creation of a new zoning district. There is no current zoning that would enable the City to be clearly consistent with the Comprehensive plan. Council member Burgstahler referenced pages 80 -81 of the Centerville Comprehensive Plan noting that the definition is very specific in terms as to what Low Density Development is. Commission member Drilling noted that the size of the lot does not guarantee that a non - starter home will not be built on that lot. Commission member Drilling also questioned as to what other options would be available to guarantee the type of home the City would like to see built, besides the creation of a new zoning district. He felt that the a developer's agreement could address this. L P &Z MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 6, 1990 PAGE SIX Liaison Pelton expressed that this was needed for the phasing in of housing for the existing rural residential residents. Chairman Tourville expressed that he would prefer to use Estate versus Executive in the naming of this proposed R5 zoning district. Chairman Tourville also expressed that it behooves the City to offer more housing alternatives. Commission member Welk questioned as to how the graduation from the different zoning districts would be done. Liaison Pelton noted that this would have to be site specific. Motion by Welk, second by Drilling to recommend to the City Council the concept of an R -5 Estate Zoning District, motion carried unanimously. Motion by Welk, second by Drilling to recommend to the City Council the amendments to Ordinance *4, Table B, District Schedule include the following: District Min Sq Ft House Min Sq Ft Lot Minimum Front Ft R -2A 900 -1000 11,500 80 R -2 1050 -1200 15,000 100 R -5 1200 -1500 17,500 100 motion carried unanimously. POSSTBT.E AMENDMENTS TO - ORDTNANCE #4. ARTTCLE 4. NON - CONFORMTNG USES AND STRUCTURES AND ORDTNANCE #8. SECTIONS 43.44,45 Motion by Drilling, second by Wilharber to table the possible amendment to Ordinance #4, Article 4, Non - Conforming Uses and Structures, and the possible amendment to Ordinance *8, Sections 43,44, and 45 until the March 6, 1990 meeting, motion carried unanimously. APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIRPERSON Motion by Drilling, second by Wilharber to elect Dan Tourville to the position of Chairperson of the Planning and Zoning Commission, motion carried unanimously. Motion by Drilling, second by Wilharber to elect Kathy Welk to the position of Vice Chairperson of the Planning and Zoning Commission, motion carried unanimously. J r P &Z MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 6, 1990 PAGE SEVEN Motion by Wilharber, second by Drilling to adjourn their regular meeting, motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned 10:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, n Sanna E. Buckbee Assistant City Clerk L