Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-12-05 Minutes Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Centerville held a public hearing on December 5, 1989 at City Hall. The purpose of the meeting was to hear all persons regarding the possibility of rezoning the property described as follows: The South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 14 31 22 - subject to easement to rural coop power 6/24/89 - United Power Association, easement partially released 12/19/72." lying north of the Centerville Heights development, east of Mill Road, west of 20th - Avenue North, and presently in the MUSA. The proposed rezoning will be from rural residential (R -1) to High Density Single Family Residential (R -2A) and Single Family Residential Sewered (R -2). Chairman Tourville called the meeting to order at 7:14 p.m. Present: Vermeulen, Drilling, Welk, Wilharber, liaison Pelton. Chairman Tourville summarized the request for the proposed rezoning. Cliff Thatcher, representing Acorn Investments, was present. Mr. Thatcher explained the reasons for the request for rezoning of the 37 acres north of the Harstad Development, and would keep houses comparable with the other developments. Seventy -four lots are proposed for development, and Mr. Thatcher feels this would be economically feasible and sound for development. Mr. Thatcher stated that 10,000 square foot lots and 9/10 acre lots would be developed, that the houses would be in the $90,000 to $140,000 price range and would not be starter homes. The following audience members were present and participated in the discussion on rezoning of the 37 acres: Bob Moore 4949 Division Avenue, White Bear Lake Pat Fruth 7384 Mill Road, Centerville Maureen Aselson 7232 Mill Road, Centerville George Haberman 7288 Mill Road, Centerville Bob Burgstahler 7381 Mill Road, Centerville Fred Fischer 7396 Mill Road, uenterville Gerald Rehbein 6266 Otter Lake Road, Lino Lakes Judy Burgstahler 7381 Mill Road, Centerville Some of their concerns expressed were the increase of traffic on Mill Road that would be created by this development, the qualifications of the developer, what was the definition of high density housing, the preservation of open space, land dedicated for parks, where the R -2 and the R -2A lines would he on this development, the erosion of lifestyles of the residents close to the development, how long was the MUSA expansion good for, and when Industrial and Commercial zones would be MUSA priorities. Tamara Miltz- Miller, City Clerk /Administrator was also present and stated that a Developer's Agreement could address the type and size homes that the City would like to see built in this area. Page Two P &Z Meeting Minutes December 5, 1989 Chairman Tourville stated that he did not think the City could legally place covenants on size, but that the City could rezone a property as to size of lots allowed. Chairman Tourville also explained the R2A and R2 zoning districts. R2A being the smallest (80' fronts - 10,000 square feet), R2 being medium density (100' fronts - 15,000 square feet) and that the next zoning district is R1 (10 acre parcels). He also referenced pages 80 and 81 of the Centerville Comprehensive plan as to the definition of R2A High Density. Cliff Thatcher stated that there would be a gradually phasing in of the development and did not know how may lots would be in each zoning district. He also stated that in respect to the Northern 2/3 of the development the lots would be greater than, but not much more than 1/2 - 2 units per acre, with 15,000 square foot lots being the smallest. He also felt that 2.3 units per acre was more economically feasible, and anything less than that would be to costly to them and the home owner. Liaison Pelton asked as to what his park plans would be with development. If the City requests Park land dedication would this still be feasible? The Park and Recreation Committee may request 10% or 3.7 acres of the land be donated to them for a future park. Cliff Thatcher stated that this would seem logical and that there would be no ponding in the park area. Liaison Pelton also stated that the traffic on Mill Road is a big problem. To avoid the erosion of lifestyle to the property owners there should be a buffer zone. She suggested that the lots to the North be deeper, and berming and landscaping could be included in the design of the development to act as a buffer zone. Chairman Tourville stated that berming and landscaping would be for aesthetics, but still does not keep children, ect. out of other persons property. It is difficult for the two lifestyles to coincide with each other. Cliff Thatcher expressed that the development could be done in two phases with the south part first and the north part being two or three years down the line. Liaison Pelton stated that the City may want to have Industrial and Commercial property expanded into the MUSA. Chairman Tourville expressed that the City should be able to expanded the MUSA if development in the City warrants it. Page Three P &Z Meeting Minutes December 5, 1989 Chairman Tourville also felt that the City should balance out the 100 acre MUSA expansion between Residential, Commercial, and Industrial zoned areas. It appeared to be the general consensus of the Commission that the developers of Acorn Creek, and the owners of the property to the east should try to work together so that there could be an East /West collector street which should alleviate any increase in traffic on Mill Road. Commission member Vermeulen expressed that she would like to see this south side of the proposed development zoned R2, and create a new zoning district for the north section with larger executive - type homes. Commission member Welk agreed with Commission member Vermeulen and noted that Peterson Trail is not designated a collector street. Cliff Thatcher expressed that $250,000 homes would not fit in with the Harstad Development and that this would be economically impossible for the developer. Liaison Pelton expressed that whatever it is zoned she would like to see the natural vegetation preserved (ie trees). She expressed that the plan seemed to meet the Comprehensive Plan, but questioned as to whether the south half would meet the Comprehensive Plan. Chairman Tourviile questioned as to whether there had been any topographical surveys. Cliff Thatcher stated that there has not been a topographical survey, but that there was a feasibility study done about 1 1/2 to 2 years ago, with the lower elevations designated for ponding. Motion by Vermeulen, second by Welk to adjourn the public hearing, motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Centerville held their regular scheduled meeting on December 5, 1989 at City Hall. Chairman Tourville called the meeting to order at 8:20 p.m. Present: Vermeulen, Drilling, Welk, Wilharber, liaison Pelton. Motion by Drilling, second by Vermeulen to approve the minutes of the November 9, 1989 meeting. Tourviile - aye, Vermeulen - aye, Drilling - aye, Welk - aye, Wilharber - abstain, motion carried. Page Four P &Z Meeting Minutes December 5, 1989 OLD BUSINESS: Chairman Tourville summarized the City Council's request for suggestions on rezoning of properties. Tamara Miltz - Miller, Clerk /Administrator was present. Mayor George Haberman was in the audience and expressed that the general intent was to move ahead with rezoning of some properties. It would also appear to be less costly and time consuming to hold public hearing for rezoning on more than one property at the same time. Bob Burgstahler, City Council member was also present and expressed that Comprehensive Plan Committee had tried to look for conflicts within the Comprehensive Plan. Some of the present zoning conflicts with the Comprehensive Plan and there are problems with the developers and zoning. Chairman Tourville summarized the locations of each of the properties that the City has suggested for possible rezoning. Clerk /Administrator stated that they were not here to rezone these properties at this time but only to decide if they should hold public hearings on the rezoning suggestions. Commission members discussed what properties they would like to hold public hearings on, and as to what priority they should be rezoned. Motion by Drilling, second by Welk to hold Public Hearings at the next meeting on the properties described as follows: 1) The North 10 acres of the W 1/2 of the NE quarter of the NE quarter, Section 23, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota; 2) The South half of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4; of Section 24 31 22 except the part described as follows: Commencing at NW corner of said 1/4, 1/4, then South on West line thereof 766 ft to point of beginning, then East and parallel with North line of said 1/4,1/4, 260 ft, then South and parallel with said West line 167.54 ft, then West and parallel with said North line 260 ft• to said West line, then North on said West line to point of beginning; except roads, subject to easement of Rec. and commonly known as NE of the intersection of 20th - Avenue and Main Street. motion carried unanimously. Page Five P &Z Meeting Minutes December 5, 1989 Discussion on the Codification of Ordinances. It appeared to be the general consensus of the Commission that this is too costly. The Commission would like to see City Staff continue with the retyping of Ordinances and would like to have them follow the format of Ordinance #4, as far as amendments are concerned. Motion by Drilling, second by Wilharber to drop the Codification of Ordinances as it appears to be to costly to be done, motion carried unanimously. Discussion on the Centerville Residential Development Guide. Chairman Tourville summarized to the commission the idea behind having a Residential Development Guide. Motion by Tourville, second by Drilling to table the discussion of the Centerville Residential Development Guide till the next meeting, motion carried unanimously. Discussion on the Centerville Commercial /Industrial Development Guide. It appeared to be the general consensus of the commission that having this guide was a very good idea. Tamara Miltz- Miller, Clerk/ Administrator was present and summarized the guide, explaining that the guide was not in final draft, and that approval is not what was asked. The City Council would like suggestions, changes, and direction from Planning and Zoning. Motion by Welk, second by Drilling to recommend to the City Council the acceptance of the concept of a Commercial /Industrial Development Guide, with the addition of dating pages as there are updated, motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS: A short discussion on the proposed rezoning of the 37 acres north of the Centerville Heights development. Commission member Drilling expressed that the developer should not dicate to the Commission which way the property has to be developed, and that the Comprehensive Plan should be reviewed. Liaison Felton expressed concern over reviewing of the Comprehensive Plan, that many people had worked on this, public hearings were held, and that the Comprehensive Plan was adopted through a very democratic way and should not be taken lightly. It appeared to be the general consensus not to discuss R2A zoning, that R2 is the zoning they would prefer in this area. Page Six P &Z Meeting Minutes December 5, 1989 Motion by Wilharber, second by Vermeulen to table the discussion of the proposed rezoning of Acorn Creek Development to the next meeting, motion carried unanimously. Motion by Tourville, second by Drilling to reschedule January 2, 1989 Planning and Zoning meeting to January 4, 1989 at 7 :00 p.m., motion carried unanimously. Motion by Welk, second by Drilling to adjourn the regular meeting, motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned 10:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, (7 12 bt{,ltrvOc- t , %A CC/' - t, Sanna E. Buckbee Assistant City Clerk