The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1987-08-04 Minutes Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning 8. Zoning Commission of the City of Centerville held their regular meeting on August 4, 1987 at City Hall. Chairman Tourville called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. Present: Buesseler, Lindgren, Vermeulen, Council liaison Neumann. Absent: Welk. notion by Buesseler, second by Lindgren to amend the July 7 minutes page 4, paragraph 1, from: (the most southerly 16.5 foot parcel in question could be used by itself.), to read: (the most southerly 16.5 foot parcel in question could not be used by itself.), motion carried unanimously. Motion by Buesseler, second by Lindgren to accept the minutes of the July 7, 1987, meeting, motion carried unanimously. CLD GUSIMESS Pete Johnston of P.O. Box 310, Forest Lake, submitted a request for approval of the concept of a redesignation of Lot Line common to Lot #3 and Lot #4, Block #2 - Durque Addition #1. The purpose being to make Lot 1/3 more saleable. An agreement between the two pLrties, 'ir. Johnston, owner cf 1585 Peltier Lake Drive - Lot #3 and Jeffrey and Shirley Godwin, residents and owners of 1581 Peltier Lake Drive - Lot #4 is on file with the City Clerk. Motion by Guesseler, second by Vermeulen to give tentative approval to the concept of a redesignation of Lot Line common to Lot #3 and Lot #4, Block ,=;2 - Burque Addition 01, as proposed based on findings of fact, motion carried unanimously. The above approved concept will not continue to the Council as no action is required at this time. Discussion of the Wegleitner Addition. Commission Member Buesseler suggests amending Ordinance 1/4, Schedule of District Regulations, Permitted and Special Uses, as he is not comfortable with Commercial Uses as we now have them. Commission :1ember Vermuelen feels it should be Commercial but does not want undesirable businesses there. Vermuelen also feels a need to !mend Ord. '4, regarding Commercial Use. 'lotion by Buesseler, second by Lindgren to set a Public Hearing to amend rrd. #4 to delete 07. Wholesale Businesses, #10. Auto Sales, Service a repair, ;. #11. Motor Fuel Stations, and 015. Construction Businesses, under M -1 Commercial P[.MITTEG PRINCIPAL USES and reassign those uses to USES PER ?IITTED ON SPECIAL USE PERMIT - #'s 10., 11., 12., and 13. Date of hearing set, Sept. 1, 1987, motion carried unanimously. Commission Member Duesseler was concerned about contacting other commercial businesses. It was the concensus of the Commission and Council liaison Neumann that this is not required and sufficient notice will be printed in the paper. ;lotion by Tourville, second by Lindgren recommending rezoning of Elks. //2 and 03 of the Wegleitner property on Main Street from Residential to Commercial, contingent upon revision of Ord. 04, USES 'WITHI!I THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, as addressed in the previous motion, motion carried unanimously. Note reasons: 1. In 1932, the City approved the Weglitner Addition that proposed Commercial in that Plat. P & 2 Minutes August 4, 1987 Page 2 2. Last two meetings of the Joint Committee, it was in agreement the City was looking for Commercial development, it was desirable. 3. It is not Spot Zoning because it is adjacent to Commercially Zoned properties. Discussion of 'Variance to Crd. ,i3, paragraph 45.04 -3, regarding GO day limit to register Plat with the County. P Z will not address this as they feel it is a Council decision. Motion by Guesseler, second by Lindgren for the Clerk to contact the City Attor- ney to research the possibility of any variances needed for approval of the P;egleitner Plat, motion carried unanimously. Commission member V'envuelen left the meeting at 9:45. Recess at 10:12 - Meeting resumed at 10:20. :lotion by Buesseler, second by Lindgren to table items %4 and T5 under Cld Cosiness, motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS Discussion of 1938 Budget. Commission questioned if one meeting a aIo.is enough. It :gas decided to have one extra meeting every other month. The purchase of a City neap with mylar overlays :das also discussed. Clerk was asked to check if monies carry over from year to year, and chat is the policy on this? lotion by Buesseler, second by Tourville to budget the following: $930.00 for meetings - 18 per year 0 $50.00 per meeting ($10.00 per member) $100.00 for seminars $1,200,00 for a City Map with mylar overlays of Flood Plain, Zoning and Add mans. $2,200.00 Total 1988 Budget, motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS ;lotion by Buesseler, second by Lindgren to set hearing to amend Ord. r4, Section 32.01 -1 to read: 32.01 -1 - PER'MIT REQUIRED. No home occupation may be conducted on a prop- erty without a home occupations permit. Permits will be issued By the City Clerk upon approval of City Council and the payment of the scheduled fee. When a permit is issued, the City Clerk will notify the abutting property owners in writing within thirty (30) days. 32.01 -2 - SUBORDINATE USE. The use of the property for the home occupa- tion shall be clearly incidental and subordinate to its P & Z minutes August 4, 1987 Page 3 residential use. 32.01 -3 - DIPLOYEES. The home occupation shall be carried on by a member of the family residing on the property with not more than one employee who is not part of the family. Motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS Discussion of materials for Joint Powers Meeting. A copy of State Statute 412.151, entitled Council Powers was handed out by the City Clerk. The Comm- ission asked for ten copies for the City Council and Parks and Rec. Copies of Ord. #37, concerning P & Z Commission was also handed out. It was decided that it is not current and the Clerk will make copies of Amendment for next months meeting. Crd. ,'29 was handed out and discussed. It was decided that it does not apply to existing written roles /responsibilities. ::otion by Lindgren, second by Tourville to adjourn, motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 11:30. Respectfully submitted, Beverly A.. Hughes Assistant City Clerk Changes to minutes: Paragraph 5, page 1 - Shirley to Sheila Godwin Paragraph 6, page 2 - '4 & ;/5 to - Ordinance 6, regarding land swaps, and general changes to Ordinance 1,4. Paragraph 7, page 1 - notation ( *see attachment) added to this paragraph • SUBJECT: BEDESIGNATION OF LOT LINE COMMON TO LOT 13 AND LOT 14, Block 12 — BURQUE ADDITION 11, CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: PROBLEM(S) 1. Recently established location of actual lot line referenced above has revealed the fact property (small shed and garden area) originally thought to be within lot line constraints for lot 14, block 2 are actually encroaching on property belonging to lot 13, block 2 to a substantial degree. 2. There is approximately 27' between the south face of existing garage on lot 13 and the north face of existing garage on lot 164. However, existing lot line location will not allow property owner of lot 13 to expand garage to double car capacity without the need for an approximate 2' variance. SOLUTION: Both problems 11 and 662 above can be resolved to mutual benefit and satisfaction of both affected property owners by "redesignating" location of the common lot line per attached "sketch ". This proposed lot line redesignation will permit the owner of lot 663 to expand garage to approximate width of 21' staying within the requirement for the "code" established 10' side line set back and at the same time preserving the 10' set back for existing garage on lot 14. And, this lot line redesignation will allow property owner of lot 664 to maintain current locationof his shed and garden area and eliminate the now existing encroachment. (NOTE): Both property owners of lots 13 and 14 are aware there will be a need for "survey" work to accurately establish new location of lot line along with the need for new legal description to document this lot line change. All costs for these outside services to be shared equally by "then current" owners of lots 13 and 14. APPROVALS: The undersigned property owners of lots 13 and 164, block 2 of Burque addition 11 request the planning and zoning commission of Centerville, Minnesota review the above petition to allow common lot line redesignation as proposed (above) during their meeting scheduled for August 4, 1987 and pass a favorable recommendation to the City Council for their final approval at their meeting scheduled for August 5, 1987. Since any impact from the solution to the above described "problems" will be solely and totally inclusive on us as the affected property owners we cannot foresee nor do we anticipate any justifiable objection from any outside source(s). CONCURRENCE: We, the undersigned, being the legally established owners of lots 13 and 14, block 2, Burque addition 11, have a full and complete understanding of all of the above and share mutual agreement the above represents the only practical solution to both problems 11 and 12. Consideration from both the Centerville, Minnesota Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council resulting in a final and favorable response will allow us (the respective property owners) to move forward in a manner best serving our collective /individual interests. Thank you. 4V MI (Owners of lot 13 block 12) (Owners of lot 14, block 12} Burque additi 11. Burque addition 11 • 1 lYilt: _ .1 - - I . _ 44.64 b : 141 114, Iii 1. 4 . . i n ;� ti ; Q z e riu6.LoT /EM' Z 30POSED L t 1 74.COSS16rva11aN " ca -2, c • CA • d r y r •