Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2000-11-01 Agenda
CITY OF CENTERVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION AGENDA November 1, 2000 6:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPEARANCES CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES 7 1! October 4, 2000 Parks and Recreation Meeting Minutes UNFINISHED BUSINESS A• Follow -up on Informational Meeting for Skate Park / BMX Track for Parents and Youth Proposed Trail Map - Review Maps from Engineer Tree Placement at Parks - Update , ,4/ Future Trails/Draft Trail Plan Update - Mr. LeBlanc 5. 2001 Budget NEW BUSINESS Hail Damage/Roof Replacement - Laurie LaMotte Park Warming House and McBride Park Building Ice Rink Attendants 3! Turkey Shoot DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. Parks and Recreation Monthly Report to Patricia Scott (LeJournal) ADJOURNMENT NOT APPROVED PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES October 4, 2000 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Parks and Recreation Committee of the City of Centerville held their regularly scheduled meeting on October 4, 2000 at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. Chairperson Doug Porter called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. Present: Chairperson Doug Porter Wayne LeBlanc Karla DeVine Tedd Peterson Brian Walter Terry Sweeney (Council Liaison) Absent: Staff: Jill Lien Jim March (brief appearance) APPEARANCES Mike Quigley, Gor -Em Development — Eagle Park Sport / Tennis Court Ms. Lien explained that after contacting Mr. Quigley earlier that day, he informed her that he would not be able to attend the Parks and Recreation Meeting that evening. Mr. Quigley faxed a letter to the Parks and Recreation Committee expressing his intentions regarding the completion of the park in the Eagle Pass sub - division. Mr. Quigley is currently evaluating the area required for the court to determine the possibility of providing a regulation tennis court, as well as an additional smaller court area to be used for a basketball area. Mr. Quigley is relying on the Parks and Recreation Committee's knowledge of the recreational needs of the area to be the determining factor. The consensus of the Parks and Recreation Committee was to determine if there is enough space for both a regulation size tennis court, and a sport court. The committee made the following motion: Motion by Mr. LeBlanc, seconded by Mr. Walter to have Mr. Peterson and Mr. Porter and any other available Parks and Recreation Committee Members, go to Eagle Park on Friday, October 6, 2000 at 4:00 p.m. to look at the park layout and to decide the feasibility of: 1) a regulation size tennis court, surface, fence and a separate sport court; 2) tennis court alone; and 3) sport court alone. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 1 L The committee requested Ms. Lien contact Mr. Quigley to inform him of the Parks and Recreation Committee's intentions. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES September 6, 2000 Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes Motion by Ms. DeVine, seconded by Mr. Peterson to approve the September 6, 2000 Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes with noted addition. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS Proposed Trail Map Discussion Tabled Informational Meeting for Skate Park / BMX Track for Parents and Youth The committee discussed the "sample" flyers presented by Ms. Lien along with possible dates and times to consider, and made the following motion: Motion by Mr. Porter, seconded by Mr. Walter to have Ms. Lien distribute the flyer to Centennial Middle School and Centerville Elementary School, to accept any printing costs, and to publish the meeting in the LeJournal and the Quad Community Press. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Turf Update (Laurie LaMotte Park) Mr. Peterson explained that he spoke with Valley Creek, regarding aerating the soil at Laurie LaMotte Park. During their discussion, Mr. Peterson learned that Valley Creek was already planning on aerating the soil at City Hall. Valley Creek was willing to aerate the soil at Laurie LaMotte Park for $27.50 per hour (approximately six hours). After the aeration had been complete, Mr. Peterson learned that Valley Creek spent two (2) days aerating the soil at LaMotte Park. Due to the fact that the soil was so hard, they had to aerate it twice. Even though Valley Creek spent two (2) days at LaMotte Park, they only charged the City for six (6) hours of labor. Tree Placement at Parks — Maps Mr. Porter had visited the parks prior to the meeting to sketch out each of the parks existing trees. The committee elected to roughly "plot out" the placement of the 20 Autumn Blaze Maple trees that Mr. Goetz is currently holding for the City. There will be four (4) trees planted at both Royal Meadows and Tracie McBride Parks, and seven (7) trees planted at both Acorn Creek and Laurie LaMotte Parks. Eagle Park will not receive any of the Autumn Blaze trees. Mr. Porter will contact Mr. Goetz regarding the installation of, and any suggestions he may have related to the trees and/or their surroundings. 2 I I _ Motion by Ms. DeVine, seconded by Mr. Peterson to authorize Mr. Porter to work with Mr. Goetz regarding the placement and installation of the 20 Autumn Blaze Maple trees at the parks. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Lighting of Parks / Police Grant Mr. LeBlanc explained that he had contacted Chief Heckman regarding the possibility of any type of grant funds being offered by the Police Department for lighting of parks. Unfortunately, Chief Heckman was unaware of any such grant. YMCA Update Ms. DeVine mentioned that she had contacted Craig Bode of the YMCA to learn why the Summer Youth Programs were not offered at Laurie LaMotte Park as planned. Mr. Bode explained that 25 registrations were needed in order to hold the classes and only 6 — 8 were received. Bill Bisek's "Recreational Activity Director" Proposal Update Mr. Sweeney explained the City Councils reactions to Mr. Bisek's proposal of becoming the City's "Recreational Activity Director ". The Council felt it was great that someone is willing to offer activities for both adults and youth, but the opportunity should be open for all businesses within the community, not just one. In addition, both the Council and the Parks and Recreation Committee expressed financial concerns about a local business owner offering recreational activities through the City. The Parks and Recreation Committee made the following motion: Motion by Mr. Porter, seconded by Mr. Walter to request that Mr. March write a letter to Mr. Bisek regarding City sponsored leagues vs. privately sponsored leagues, indicating that the Parks and Recreation Committee will not sponsor any privately organized leagues through the City. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. The general consensus of the Parks and Recreation Committee is to research the needs, qualifications, pay, and responsibilities of Park Directors / Coordinators in the surrounding communities. Mr. Porter will contact the University of Minnesota to explore the possibilities of obtaining a paid intern with a degree in Parks and Recreation. Mr. Porter will also contact Jim Hoeft (City Attomey) to discuss any liabilities involved, and Barry Bernstein (Lino Lakes Recreation Program Supervisor) to discuss all of the issues, concerns, pros and cons involved with a Park Director / Coordinator. Future Trails Meeting Update Mr. LeBlanc explained the meeting held on Monday, September 25 was a great success. The entire Parks and Recreation Committee along with representatives from Anoka County, Washington County, Lino Lakes, Hugo, St. Paul Water Utility and the Rice Creek Snowmobile Association were in attendance. All parties involved came together to form a general vision of the future trail systems. Mr. LeBlanc will update the proposed trail map and bring it to the November meeting. 3 1 Remaining Balance of the Parks and Recreation Budget Ms. Lien distributed an updated balance sheet provided by Ms. Bender indicating the total assets, total expenditures and total funds/balance remaining in the Parks and Recreation accounts. Mr. March explained the Capitol Improvement Projects, indicating he would like the Parks and Recreation Committee to prioritize the list included and any other projects they feel important. Mr. March also explained the increases in the budgeted amounts. The Capitol Improvement Projects packet of information was for informational purposes only at this time, with the exception of prioritizjng. The final budget is due in December. The Parks and Recreation Committee elected to visit all of the parks in Centerville on Saturday, October 28, 2000 at 8:30 a.m. to determine the goals of each park, and then to have a workshop at City Hall to discuss the entire Parks and Recreation Budget for the year 2001. The committee requested Ms. Lien notify the LeJournal and the Quad Community Press. Laurie LaMotte Park Lighting Mr. Peterson explained the light poles donated by Mr. DeFoe have all been relocated except for one that is currently being used on Mr. DeFoe's property. In addition to the donation of the light poles, Mr. DeFoe offered the scoreboard to the City. Mr. Peterson mentioned that the actual cost of the relocation would be slightly higher than previously quoted due to the additional expense of relocating the scoreboard. NEW BUSINESS Letter from Bert Casper Regarding a Trail Between Ojibway Road and Heritage Street Mr. Bert Casper (6979 Eagle Trail) e- mailed Mr. March requesting a trail be paved where a path currently exists between the dead -end of Heritage Street (on the east side of Centerville Road) and the curve on Ojibway Road. The consensus of the committee was to write a letter to Mr. Casper thanking him for his interest in a possible trail and to notify him that this will be discussed in the future. Hunter's Crossing Bituminous Trail / Acorn Creek Park Trail Mr. Tom Peterson (City Engineer) had sent a letter to Mr. Rick Carlson (Hunter's Crossing developer) regarding the bituminous trails in both the Hunter's Crossing Development and the trail around the playground equipment at Acorn Creek Park. In addition, were bids from two (2) vendors for paving the trail around the play structure, and a map of the park indicating the proposed work. The Lowest quote of $10,000 was from Arcade Asphalt, a local contractor from Centerville. The second quote of $17,347 was from Northdale Construction (Hunter's Crossing contractor). Motion by Mr. Walter, seconded by Ms. DeVine to recommend to City Council the acceptance of the bid from Arcade Asphalt in the amount of $10,000 for paving the trail at Acorn Creek Park as indicated. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 4 Sheehy Land Donation Ms. Lien explained that Mr. Cy Sheehy is willing to donate land located in the Industrial Park area just behind Goetz Landscape and Northern Forest Products between 20 and 21' Avenues to the City. It is currently a 20 -acre parcel in which Mr. Sheehy would like to donate 15 -acres of. As indicated in Mr. March's Week in Review, if the City obtained this 15- acres, we would have the future trail linkage area secured to traverse, and would be consistent with the long -term trail plan to connect to the City of Hugo. The property has a high potential for recreational uses, and could also be a site for a future water tower. In addition, a local business owner has expressed his interest in purchasing or renting a portion of this property from the City, if we accept the proposed donation. This was presented to the Parks and Recreation Committee for informational purposes only at this time. Capitol Improvement Projects Discussed previously. Ground Development Concept Plan The committee discussed the proposed Ground Development Concept Plan for the property located just south of the Center Oaks Development. Ground Development is proposing 17,500 square foot minimum lots. The committee was not in favor of the proposed Ground Development Concept Plan as presented. DISCUSSION ITEMS Parks and Recreation's Monthly Report to Patricia Scott (LeJournal) The committee directed Ms. DeVine to focus most of the monthly Parks and Recreation update on the Skate Park / BMX Track Informational meeting to be held on Thursday, October 26, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. Motion by Mr. Porter, seconded by Mr. Peterson to adjourn the October 4, 2000 Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Jill Lien Staff Liaison 5 MEMO Date: October 27, 2000 To: Chairperson Porter Parks and Recreation Committee From: Jill Lien Re: Follow -up on Informational Meeting I have included this on the agenda for discussion amongst the committee. Thank you! MEMO Date: October 27, 2000 To: Chairperson Porter Parks and Recreation Committee From: Jill Lien Re: Proposed Trail Map Mr. Schluender (City Engineer) has dropped off copies of the "proposed trail map" for you to review, comment and/or change. I will bring the maps to the meeting for you to review. Thank you! MEMO Date: October 27, 2000 To: Chairperson Porter Parks and Recreation Committee From: Jill Lien Re: Tree Placement Update I have included this on the agenda for Mr. Porter to update the committee on the status of his conversations with Mr. Goetz, and on the status of the tree placement at the parks. Also included is a copy of the invoice from Goetz Landscape for the cost and installation of the trees. Thank you Doug! Goetz Landscape Invoice 2030 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 DATE INVOICE # Voice: 651- 426 -2136 Fax: 651- 426 -2451 10/26(00 11315 BILL TO Centerville Park and Recreation OCT 1850 Main Street 4p4 ( 2 7 nnoo Centerville, MN 55038 CU TERMS DUE UPON RECEIPT QUANTITY ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION CLASS AMOUNT 1 Landscape Cost and Installation of40 Trees. Landscape 11,171.00 1 Landscape 9 -29 -00 Landscape - 7,400.00 Its been a pleasure working with you! Total $3,771.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS ! MEMO Date: October 27, 2000 To: Chairperson Porter Parks and Recreation Committee From: Jill Lien Re: Future Trails / Draft Trail Plan Update Included in your packet is a draft Mr. LeBlanc has submitted for the "Future Trail Plan". Thank you Wayne! , Northeast Metro Trail Plan (Draft) October 4, 2000 Centerville Park and Recreation, 651429 -3232, Wayne LeBlanc, 651426 -0168 Centerville, Lino Lakes, Hugo, Anoka Parks, Anoka County, Washington County, Ramsey County, and the surrounding Metro area benefit from the trail plan in Figure 1. The trails connect the Hugo trail that will eventually go to Duluth to other trails connected to the Chain of Lakes Park and south to Otter Lake Park including a future recreational park at Birch Street and Centerville Road. The trails in and around Centerville are designed to promote safe pedestrian and bicycle routes to parks, commercial areas, other trails, homes, and places of interest. In addition, loops in the design enhance flexibility and appeal. '� r The purpose of this plan is to '" #' 1 ` coordinate the participating organizations. Please contact h ;- �, ; F� " ' � � � Centerville or Wayne LeBlanc to coordinate actions. e r , -4 4, �� �" � _erg , , On Sep 25, 2000, people _ 1 - representing Centerville, Hugo, Lino '' t t , '' In ® Lakes, Anoka County Parks, St Paul , TM fi � „ r "°' ,� � 4) � ��, :',"'s Water, and Washington County t ; 4.1 _ 1 s � m P Parks met and agreed to pursue this I. plan kt i 0 Considerations for particular areas ..e t4; : Rvi LL are identified with large letters L. A °ma �' an d escr ibed be low. -f i m ' Area A: Hugo to Pedestrian ' r Bri at 35E s ,,� „� 1 � ; � ®' Hugo, Washington County, Lino _ Lakes, and Anoka County plan to I' ; 10° I, t " 1 coordinate the route of a trail from A t k - > `. the existing Hugo trail to a proposed ' � _ t" ,� j �� � . " pedestrian bridge at Area B, where e t , 1 s s J in id 35E and Clearwater Creek intersect. r1 .,F With Hugo's planned reconstruction of the road from Area A to Hugo in Figure 1. Trail Plan the next couple years, the inclusion of the trail follows naturally. The urgency here is to include the trail in the forthcoming reconstruction. Hugo is also looking at the potential of providing an attractive trail along Clearwater Creek all the way to Bald Eagle Lake. Area B: Pedestrian Bridge at 35E Area B was chosen for a pedestrian bridge to cross 35E because there are plans in Hugo to provide a trail along Clearwater Creek and because it would more easily accommodate pedestrian traffic than at the automobile intensive freeway interchange at 35E and County Road 14 (Frenchman Road). The urgency here is to control development in th e3wrounding area on both sides of the freeway now to provide a route for the pedestrian bri dge At the meeting everyone thought this appears feasible. There may also be a possibility to request funds for a pedestrian bridge in 2002. A small section of land west of 35E to 20` Ave needs to be coordinated by Lino Lakes, Centerville, and Anoka County. 1 A rea F: Circular Trail around Centerville Lake The best route for a circular trail around Centerville Lake is on the south side of County 14. Property in and around Watenvorks may sgort be developed. °tber property just south of Mound Trail on County 14 may also be developed at some point, and when that happens, a trail could be designed and built with the development The urgency here is to establish the spec for the trail so that development of the areas is done consistent with the inclusion of a trail as shown. Area G: Warne Nature Center Anoka County Parks already has a plan to construct a trail from area H to the Wargo Nature Center in phase 2 of their park plan. Area H: Trail Connections Area H shows the Anoka Chain of Lakes trail connecting to Lino Lakes to the west and eventually connecting to other trails that will run throughout the Metro area and beyond! Area I: Lamotte Park to Main Street. and St Paul Water Property The largest park in Centerville is Lamotte Park located in Area I. A connection from Lamotte Park to Anoka Park has just been completed and is in heavy use. To complete the Centerville Lake loop, a trail is needed from Lamotte Park to Main Street. Just to the north of Lamotte Park is church property which offers potential fora trail off the road. In addition, the streets by the church offer potential to be closed off to auto traffic offering a trail free of automobiles (in addition to a nice pedestrian space). At Area I, the St Paul Water Utility has property that may come up for sale in a couple years. This area, being right across the street from Lamotte Park would make a great Lakeshore park and pier, possibly jointly owned by Centerville and Lino Lakes. Area J: Centerville Trail South A current easement through Area J is perfect for a trail to be constructed as this land is developed. A trail from I to Centerville Road was just completed. This would complete a loop through the heart of Centerville. Area K. L. and M: Water Utility Easement Trail to Future Lino Lakes Recreational Park Area K has a St Paul Water Utility easement that could provide a trail between Lamotte Park and a future Lino Lakes Recreational area at Area L. St Paul Water Utility would allow such a trail with certain conditions. This trail • could continue south on the Water Utility easement to parks and trails to the south, and the advantage is the trail is separate from the road. A wildlife area offers potential at Amelia Lake, in addition. Summary As a follow on to the Minnesota Design Team visit in Centerville, a "Trails, Parks, and Lakes" committee formed and considered numerous alternatives. The plan described is the result of a year's worth of citizen discussions and participation and another year of coordination with surrounding communities. The plan fits well with the existing plans of surrounding communities and governmental units. Centerville, Hugo, Lino Lakes, Anoka County, and Washington County are poised to provide a fabulous trail system that would benefit everyone. Contact the City of Centerville, 651- 429 -3232 or Wayne LeBlanc, 651- 426 -0168 for further details. 3 • MEMO Date: October 27, 2000 To: Chairperson Porter Parks and Recreation Committee From: Jill Lien Re: 2001 Budget Included in your packet are copies of: 1) 1999 Budget information 2) Budget worksheet for 2001 (submitted to you in September) 3) Balance of Park Funds (submitted to you in October) Thank you! L - „Ltd_ /995I A f0,oD 1 Sep 1999 Park park Weas _ _ Page 1 Wed11:04AM CITY OF CENTERVILLE Originator Date Approval Date Obj Last Year Current Account Code Description Expended YTD Amount Budget ' Fund 101 GENERAL FUND Dept 45200 Parks (GENERAL) 101 -45200 -100 Wages and Salaries (GENERAL) '•3 4,151.16 20,000 101 - 45200 -121 PERA 97.12 134.29 0 101- 45200 -122 FICA 183.20 310.56 0 101- 45200 -130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) 11.71 41.83 0 101- 45200 -131 Employer Paid Health 0.00 0.00 0 101 -45200 -133 Employer Paid Dental 0.00 8.71 0 101 -45200 -134 Employer Paid Life 0.00 0.00 0 101 -45200 -135 Employer Paid Other 0.00 0.00 0 101-45200 -140 Unemployment Comp (GENERAL) 0.00 0.00 0 101 - 45200 -141 Unemploy Comp Insurance Prem 0.00 0.00 0 101 -45200 -142 Unemployment Benefit Payments 0.00 0.00 0 101 - 45200 -150 Worker's Comp (GENERAL) 0.00 0.00 0 101- 45200 -151 Worker's Comp Insurance Pres 0.00 164.00 0 101-45200 -152 Worker's Comp Benefit Payments 0.00 0.00 0 101 - 45200 -160 Liability Insurance Employees 0.00 0.00 0 101 -45200 -194 DEFERRED INCOME 90.50 127.19 0 101 - 45200 -200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) 23.81 0.00 0 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 860.45 489.05 0 101 - 45200-212 Motor Fuels 177.22 41.43 0 101 - 45200 -217 Other Operating Supplies 0.00 0.00 0 101 - 45200 -220 Repair / Maint Supply (GENERAL) 1,283.28 182.53 0 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts 523.87 0.00 0 101 -45200 -223 Building Repair Supplies 119.10 0.00 0 101- 45200 -`225 Landscaping Materials 83.13 83.13 0 101- 45200 -230 PARR SUPPLIES 184.56 0.00 0 101- 45200 -240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 80.87 0.00 0 101 - 45200 -258 Maps 0.00 0.00 0 101- 45200 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 3,881.94 0.00 0 101 -45200 -303 Engineering Fees 5,261.19 0.00 0 101 -45200 -304 Legal Fees 16.00 0.00 0 101- 45200 -321 Telephone 468.45 348.23 0 101 -45200 -340 Advertising d PRINTING 107.70 0.00 0 101 -45200 -350 PUBLISHING 278.40 37.13 0 101- 45200 -380 Utility Services (GENERAL) 729.37 859.86 0 101 -45200 -404 Repairs /Maint Machinery /Equip 540.66 19.04 0 101 -45200 -410 Rentals (GENERAL) 768.35 0.00 0 101 - 45200 -430 Miscellaneous (GENERAL) -25.00 34.10 0 101 -45200 -438 MEETING PER DIEM 400.00 340.00 0 101 -45200 -490 Donations to Civic Org's 0.'( 0.00 0 101 -45200-510 Land 0.00 0.00 0 101 - 45200 -540 Heavy Machinery 287.12 287.12 0 101-45$00 -580 Other Equipment 400,44 0.00 0 101 - 45200 -810 REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 0.00 0.00 0 Totals Dept 45200 Parks (GENERAL) 20,783.78 7,659.36 20,000 Dept 45202 Park Areas 101 - 45202 -100 Wages and Salaries (GENERAL) 10,024.97 4,390.44 12,859 1 Sep 1999 Park /park Areas Page 2 - Wed 11:04 AM CITY OF CENTERVILLE Originator Date _ • Approval Date Obj Last Year Current Account Code Description, Expended YTD Amount Budget Fund 101 GENERAL FUND Dept 45202 Park Areas • ' 101 - 45202 -121 PERA 561.96 227.44 666 101- 45202 -122 FICA 617.99 335.87 984 101 -45202 -130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) 234.67 126.16 864 101 -45202 -131 Employer Paid Health 0.00 0.00 0 101 - 45202 - 133 Employer Paid Dental 0.00 33.81 0 101-45202 -134 Employer Paid Life 0.00 0.00 0 101 -45302-135 Employer Paid Other 0.00 0.00 0 101- 45202 -140 Unemployment Comp (GENERAL) 0.00 0.00 0 101 -45202 -141 Unemploy Comp Insurance Prem 0.00 0.00 0 101 - 4520:2 -142 Unemployment Benefit Payments 0.00 0.00 0 101 -45202 -150 Worker's Comp (GENERAL) 0.00 0.00 1,000 - 101 -45202 -151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 0.00 0.00 0 101- 45202 -152 Worker's Comp Benefit Payments 0.00 0.00 0 101 -45202 -160 Liability Insurance Employees 0.00 0.00 0 101- 45202 -194 DEFERRED INCOME 237.89 148.85 0 101 - 45202 -200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) 0.00 0.00 150 101 - 45202 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) 19.32 177.51 1,800 101 -45202 -212 Motor Fuels 9.45 373.79 800 101 - 45202 -217 Other Operating Supplies 0.00 0.00 0 101- 45202 -220 Repair /Maint Supply (GENERAL) 577.25 1,425.90 2,000 101 - 45202 -221 Equipment Parts 12.18 0.00 500 101-45202-223 Building Repair Supplies 0.00 500.00 500 101 Landscaping Materials 68.50 590.62 150 • 101- 45202 -230 PARK SUPPLIES 364.24 0.00 3,000 101 -45202 -240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 445.12 0.00 0 101- 45202 -258 Maps 0.00 0.00 0 101- 45202 -300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) 853.36 0.00 600 101 -45202 -303 Engineering Fees 0.00 0.00 0 101 - 45202 -304 Legal Fees 0.00 0.00 0 101- 45202 -321 Telephone 37.22 0.00 500 101 -45202 -360 Insurance (GENERAL) 0.00 1,612.00 0 101 - 45202 -380 Utility Services (GENERAL) 2,915.25 357.48 2,700 101 -45202 -404 Repairs /Maint Machinery /Equip 209.14 941.12 1,400 101 -45202 -410 Rentals (GENERAL) 159.75 0.00 500 101-45202-430 Miscellaneous (GENERAL) 0.00 850.94 304 101- 45202 -540 Heavy Machinery 3,000.00 0.00 0 101 -45202 -580 Other Equipment 2,029.04 137.12 4,000 101- 45202 -810 REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 0.00 0.00 0 Totals Dept 45202 Park Areas 22,377.30 12,229.05 35,277 Tot81s Fund 101 GENERAL FUND 43,161.08 19,888.41 55,277 Grand Total 43,161.08 19,888.41 55,277 TO: Parks and Recreation Committee FROM: Teresa Bender, Clerk/Treasurer SUBJECT: 2001 Budget DATE: August 31, 2000 Attached you will find a budget worksheet for the year 2001. Last year's budget amount was $50,000; preliminary numbers were inserted by both Jim March, (City Administrator) and Paul Palzer, (Public Works), for the budget workshop meeting. These numbers can be modified. Also, in 2000 the budgeted amount was put in the line item Wages and Salaries, that has been moved to Capital Outlay on this budget. Please discuss this issue, and forward your results to staff. Thank you. • a 0 0 r a 0 c g c 3 88888888888888888888888888888888 m a s 88888888888888888888888888888888 Oa 5 S w w w S S S S 8 w $ a S g g S S S w 8 w S w Ss g ° w Ss 8 w S w S NN CO a p p pp p pp�p ppppppp p r C oo A 8 8 Va p N Fa' ( t`2 pO p O N O 8 o S p S S S to p O C p 2 � {pip! N O O O O O O O p O p 8 8 O E K (D !O f � f9 fA < Hi f9 M �N G�0 Y N N W KN H W O M e, 3 w 0 o w Yi O 1 AfNH A a J > «, J w / 5! 111 pp 8 8 pp 8 8 8 {t�� (p 8 8 8 8 8 8 LC 2 Y l 8 8 2 O Y 8. 8 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 1 8 O �i A 8 8 8 8 ate 8 8 8 8 E Z o ill 0 > co a W � �5 VI I 2,. c i ffi s& m 'o m 'a 8 x L L W i V p fit 55 &"aa a ffi s a n d }' N a F b' O ° L g g fig `a 8 a m o o V = 3 E g a 4 n z' g m 3 n n n Q K >>, rd o f �' w K (o i o E 8 3 3 3 3 a >> w w w w w lL d 3 5 K 0 =. 0 0 s EL X w 5y o a a a a a a a a a o a. a a a O t LL a a a t 0 8 $ 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 S O O O 3 O 3 g O a a a a a IA 04 01 a a a a a 4 0 8 0 0 01 0 0 0 a a a a 4 a a aa a aa a aa a s 1- tla � W - O 3 5 5> O J 3 9 5= 5 5 5 5❑ O J J ' 0 0 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL lL 1.. LL LL LL LL Z a r E 8 @ c Si E c c cc c c c c c c c c c u c Q o O U' o 0000 0' 0' 0 0 0 0 U' 0 0 U' U' U' 0 U' U' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J z �.l. O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL Yig o-- PARK FUND Audited End of Year (1999) Park Fund Balance $31,675.00 Hunter's Crossing Park Dedication Funds $74,000.00 $105,675.00 2000 Budget Amount $50,000.00 TOTAL ASSETS 155,675.00 2000 Expenditures Goetz Landscaping 12,755.00 MN/WI Playground Equipment 15,110.78 Tru- Green /Chem Lawn 4,823.20 W.B. Miller (LaMotte Trail) 9,555.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 42,243.98 TOTAL FUNDS 1 113,431.02 163, /431; 02 ( o a Crg Nr h I evute 6 003 0 `vim' ,)," ,,i / \6/, \\0 4 . t-'-' MEMO Date: October 27, 2000 To: Chairperson Porter Parks and Recreation Committee From: Jill Lien Re: Hail Damage Mr. Peterson has requested this be added to the agenda for discussion. Apparently there is hail damage to the roofs at the LaMotte warming house, and the McBride building. Thank you! 1 MEMO Date: October 27, 2000 To: Chairperson Porter Parks and Recreation Committee From: Jill Lien Re: Ice Rink Attendants Included in your packet are copies of the information provided to interested job applicants for the ice rink attendant positions for the year 1999 -2000. Also included is a copy of the 1999 -2000 Centerville Ice Rink Attendant list, and a copy of the schedule for the month of February (for an example). In the past, any rink attendant who worked the previous year is given "first dibs" on working again in the current year. The committee will need to elect someone to "run / supervise" the attendants and warming house. Thank you! TO ALL JOB APPLICANTS: Thank you for the interest you have shown in our Ice Rink Attendant Position. The following information must be completed and returned to me by 4:00 p.m., Friday, November 12, 1999, City Application EEO Information The City of Centerville considers applicants for all positions without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, marital status, the presence of a non - job - related medical condition or handicap, or any other legally protected status. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to provide equal employment opportunities to all persons. All employment policies and practices shall be non- discriminatory in compliance with federal laws, state statute and local ordinances. Please return application information to: Mr. James March/Administrator City of Centerville 1880 Main Street Centerville, MN 55038 (651) 429-3232 THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE ICE SKATING RINK ATTENDANT PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT SALARY $7.50 to $8.00 per hour depending on qualifications and experience. No benefits. SCOPE OF JOB Under administrative direction, the supervisor is responsible for monitoring the warming house and skating rink. Must be available to work week nights and/or weekends from mid December to mid February. ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Supervise and monitor warming house facility and skating rink. 2. Maintain warming house area and restroom. 3. Shovel snow to building entrance. 4. Perform light ice maintenance duties. 5. Monitor skating rinks to ensure safe skating. 6. Keep general skating area free from debris. 7. Perform record keeping tasks (time sheets, schedules and other required reports). 8. Maintain and control equipment inventory. 9. Provide general direction and supervision to youth and adults. 10. Perform other duties as assigned. KNOWLEDGE SKILLS AND ABILITIES 1. Knowledge of general house keeping techniques for building maintenance. 2. Ability to communicate effectively and appropriately in English with all age groups. 3. Ability to maintain skating building and rink in a safe manner. 4. Knowledge of and ability to apply basic first -aid techniques. 5. Ability to keep and maintain records. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS 1. Must be at least 14 years of age. 2. No experience necessary. The City of Centerville considers applicants for all positions without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, marital status, the presence of a non-job-related medical condition or handicap, or any other legally protected status. It is the policy of the City of Centerville to provide equal employment opportunities to all persons. All employment policies and practices shall be non - discriminatory in compliance with federal laws, state stature and local ordinances. 10/28/99 r • • CITY OF CENTERVILLE APPLICATION-FOR EMPLOYMENT PERSONAL INFORMATION DATE Name Last First Middle Present Address • Street City State Zip Permanent Address Street City State Zip Are you 18 years or older? Yes __ No i Phone Number - EMPLOYMENT DESIRED Position Date you can start Salary required Have you filed an application here before? Yes No If yes, give date Have you ever been employed here before? Yes No If yes, give date Referral Source: Ad ( specify newspaper) Walk -in _ Other Are you now employed? Yes — No _ If yes, may we contact your employer? Yes ^ No Are you available to work Full -Time Part-Time Temporary List Hours available EDUCATION Name and # of Years Diploma/ Location Attended Degree High school College/Trade Other Special Skills and Qualifications List license held relevant to employment: Type: Number: Exp. Date Type: Number: Exp. Date EMPLOYMENT EXPERIENCE Please list last 3 employers, present or most recent employer first. Employer Dates Employed From To Address Phone Number Job Title Supervisor's Title Description of Duties Reason for leaving Hourly Rate From To Employer Dates Employed From To Address Phone Number Job Title Supervisor's Title Description of Duties Reason for leaving Hourly Rate From To Employer Dates Employed From To Address Phone Number Job Title Supervisor's Title Description of Duties Reason for leaving Hourly Rate From To PERSONAL REFERENCES Please list 3 people you have known for at least 1 year not related to you. Name Address Phone # of years acquainted I authorize investigation of' all statements contained in this application for employment as may be necessary to determine eligibility for employment. I certify that answers given herein are true and complete to the best of my knowledge and I understand that, if employed, falsification statements on P g this application shall be grounds for dismissal. I understand and agree that, if hired, my employment in the City of Centerville, is for no definite period and may be terminated at any time. Signature Date Candidate Name SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION CITY OF CENTERVILLE POSITION: TEMPORARY SKATING RINK ATTENDANT TO ALL JOB APPLICANTS: COMPLETION OF THIS SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION IS REQUIRED AS PART OF IRE CITY'S EMPLOYMENT PROCESS IN ORDER TO MORE ACCURATELY EVALUATE YOUR QUALIFICATIONS FOR POSITION TEMPORARY SKATING RINK SUPERVISOR Al. Have you graduated from high school? YES NO Name of School: B2. Describe your experience as a skating rink supervisor. Be specific: location, number of years, how , frequent, and in what capacity, etc. C3. Describe your experience supervising a recreational or educational program. Be specific: location, number of years, how frequent, and in what capacity, etc. Dd Describe your knowledge of general record keeping procedures. Be specific: Course work, job experience, types of records, etc. • ES. Describe your experience in performing building maintenance, i.e., general housekeeping. Be specific: How long, list responsibilities, etc. I_ _ • • F6. Describe your experience working with different age groups. He specific: number of years, how frequent and in what capacity, etc. G7. Describe your training and knowledge of basic first -aid Are you certified? Be specific. H8. What other experience do you have that we should know about as we consider you for this position? J 1999 - 2000 Centerville Ice Rink Attendants V 0 ro Name Phone Address Rate /Hour 1 Olson, Charlie 426 -0354 1566 Lamotte Circle, Centerville $8.00 2 Tucedo, Elliot 653 -0679 6440Joyner Ln,Lino Lakes 55038 $7.75 1, 3 Skeie, Joe 426 -0083 Mill Road, Centerville $7.50 f 4 Helmbrecht, Jerid 653 -1118 Main Street, Centerville $7.50 ` 5 Lathae, Jose 762 -0664 7224 Mill Road, Centerville $7.50 ,\ $ 7 f email address Police 911 City of Centerville 429 -3232 tbender @centervillemn.com . Warming House 426 -6579 Steve Brown 653 -8162 slbrown @pro - ns.net Julia Bertran 784 -3099 Name Key # , email address Olson, Charlie C23 none Tucedo, Elliot C33 none Skeie, Joe C44 none Helmbrecht, Jerid C22 none Lathae, Jose C21 none I O7 N M T cr) I T co O C'7 co O CO ,-. O p 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N N 1C)C ¢} s 5+ t @ ' CO CO N. �t \ � o �I ' � r' N 0)= 0 Oa . 0 - - w CD N WU -3 — ° » O c c N a O� ,,, - ,I. I'n 9- U r ^ 0 i N -°) Li o, -`-- l m ci N rn = - 1 as v> v, m u, r � ` s _ O j ' >, c 41 `- ' 11 u; -c, a, _ u; �-' v 1 �' �'� o� s cam. (r. --, a N, U (3 a I I I � , o rn u ? c5"' a) Y,; �} Le) I N u> ,n ago -- Li) N II (U O O cr', O L V 0, P u p Lo in ` a , l'1 Il (`- 1 J L , A Lj v L n .. - o .... 7:- _ G o p- N N- a N O w N° ,q 3.33.71 ID ° w a 0 ; ;' c` c� - F m o 70 V . U E c. E W -) E MEMO Date: October 27, 2000 To: Chairperson Porter Parks and Recreation Committee From: Ji11 Lien Re: Turkey Shoot Included in your packet is an invitation from the Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department to participate in their 3n Annual Turkey Shoot. Any comments? Thank you! Lino taken Perks sns Recreation •perkrrent 500 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 ! ' Phenol (051) t022440 t Pale (551) 0024430 C 1 T r : f 0 F INi1r•KE Fax To: .1111 Lain Proms Liz Bum* Program Bupenieor Ganiwnyi City of Centenrille rem 2, Inducting cover Pem Oak 10121/00 — Plwme CC: ❑ Urgent O Per Review O Plea Comment ❑ Plano Reply 0 Mon Recycle • Comment•t (Event Filer to follow) NOTICE: Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department Presents... 3` Annual Family Turkey Shoot with support from Circle Pines Lexington Lions Forest Lake Area Athletic Association Lino Lakes Lions Lino Lakes State Bank - �1V'il/VV CAS 1L.11 IAA VOLVO %%%%% LL rAAn Of 1{LUGAIIVO Sr VJaMLZAWILLC 1 .411 RigUtL . Lino Lakes Punks anb Recneation Depautment . Family Trmkey Shoot ,,vow ; .. Giant '_ .,tom Satauba November& 11 2000 Inflatable Arch 10:00 - 11:30 am Bounce `- Centennial Mfbble School FREE! Join the Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department for the Family Turkey Shoot. This FREE fun - filled family event consists of low -key competition in a variety of athletic events. Teams consist of one adult and one child (ages 4-14 An adult may bring more than one child. Participants are welcome to arrive anytime between 10:00 - 11:00 am and may leave after they have completed all activities (approx. time to complete all activities: 20 min.). No pre-registration required All participants will be eligible to win prizes that will help make their Thanksgiving festivities complete. Seasonal, holiday refreshments will be served after the event. COME AND JOIN IN ME FUNIt Baseball Throw © Frisbee Toss Basketball Free Throw reit Beanbag Ibss Football Throw S. Floor Hockey Shoot Circle Pines Lino Lakes State Bank Forest Lake Lexington SPECIAL T Lino Lakes TO OUR SPONSORS! Arta Athletic C- Lions Lino Lakes Lions Association ' In keeping with the holiday spirit, the Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department will be collecting nonperishable food items at the Family Turkey Shoot to donate to the Centennial FoodShe(f IR ask that you please consider donating a nonperishable food hem to help those in need this holiday season. Thank you tarpons kindless and genewsiry. For more information, please call the Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department at 651- 982 -2140. I F Y Page 1 of 2 Jim March To: Wayne LeBlanc; Theresa Brenner; Tom Peterson; Tim Rehbine; Ray Devine; Michelle Moser; Lori Dom; John McLean; Jim Hoeft; Hanna Tilsen; Brian Hanson; Patricia Scott; Elizabeth Schelier, Doug Porter; Dave Kilian; Mary Capra; Aimee Fairbrother, City Council Subject: Week in Review Week in Review October 6, 2000 Building Permits this Period = 3 Building Permits YTD =142 New Homes Year to Date = 40 * Ballfield lights from the Waterworks former ballfield were donated to the City and have been moved and installed at one of the ballfields at LaMotte Park. Mr. DeFoe is also donating the scoreboard from his field to the City. * The temporary mobile banking facility for the County Bank was moved on to their lot on Wednesday. They plan to have the mobile building anchored to the ground and will begin operations in the temporary facility within the next couple of weeks. * Curb and gutter has been installed in the Hunter's Crossing subdivision. Asphalt base is planned for the next couple of weeks. * The public works department has moved in to their new offices. Hydrants were also flushed throughout the City this week. * Two quotes were received for the paving of the path at Acom Creek Park including the path around the playground equipment. Arcade Asphalt quoted $10,000 and Northdale Construction quoted a little over $17,000. Arcade Asphalt will be paving the trail after Council approves the quote on Wednesday. * The company from Iowa that is building the ladder truck for the fire department e- mailed a picture of the new vehicle. Delivery is scheduled for next week. * The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed a sketch plan for the former Gor -ern property south of Center Oaks. They are proposing an 88 lot subdivision on approximately 55 acres. The Planning Commission provided many comments on the proposed subdivision. Ground Development is the name of the company interested in the property. The average size of the proposed lots is a little over 19,000 square feet. * A Council workshop was held Wednesday evening. We discussed the 2001 budget and 10/6/00 Page 2 of 2 began discussions of prioritizing projects that were proposed in a draft five year Capital Improvement Plan. Have a good weekend and enjoy the snowflakes! 10/6/00 Page 1 of 2 Jim March To: Wayne LeBlanc; Theresa Brenner, Tom Peterson; Tim Rehbine; Ray Devine; Michelle Moser; Lori Dom; John McLean; Jim Hoeft; Hanna Tilsen; Brian Hanson; Patricia Scott; Elizabeth Scheller; Doug Porter, Dave Kilian; Mary Capra; Aimee Fairbrother, City Council Subject: Week in Review Week in Review October 13, 2000 Building Permits this Period = 7 Building Permits YTD = 149 New Homes Year to Date = 40 * - -.... k*A******** ** * ** *** ****** AA*Ak********* alt*al AA- A4*************** ** *** * ********** *** * * * * ******** * I had a meeting with Alicia Vap from the Ramsey County Regional Rail Authority. They are conducting a study of the Rush Line Corridor that extends along 1 -35 from St. Paul to Hinckley. This corridor study is examining transportation issues such as dial -a- rides, carpooling, park and rides and commuter rail. This study has been initiated through the allocation of federal funds. They are in a fact finding mode right now. They will be forwarding a draft study once it is completed. There are no funds currently available to implement any of the potential suggestions or recommendations that will be presented in the study. * 1 have a meeting scheduled with Larry Neilson who is the legal representative for Sheehy Construction. This meeting is scheduled for October 23rd. We will be discussing the details of the proposed fifteen acre donation of Industrial land to the City. * As directed by Council, 1 have ordered an appraisal for all of the properties on the block which contains the old public works building. The appraiser will also be establishing a value for the vacant agricultural property owned by the Church of St. Genevieve. It appears that the local parish needs to internally decide whether to expand the current church or build a new church on the property that is already owned by the church. If the parish decides to expand the church, then we will have the appraisals ready and we will be able to begin negotiations for a potential land swap or purchase. * I attended the Fire Steering Committee yesterday afternoon. Fire Chief Bennett was authorized to purchase a hand -held thermal imaging unit. This unit was demonstrated to the Committee. The product is used to locate individuals trapped in smoke filled buildings. The unit was very sensitive and could pick up small variations in temperature. The unit is also useful for identifying hotspots in a burning structure and has been credited for saving several lives. The unit costs approximately $18,000 and was paid for entirely by charitable gambling proceeds. The Committee also was able to view the newly delivered ladder truck that was purchased. The ladder extends sixty -five feet and has a remote control nozzle on 10/13/00 —ra 4 UJ. the top of the ladder. This vehicle will be useful for conducting on -roof rescues within the district. I will ask Milo if the fire department would be willing to use the nozzle on the extended ladder to extinguish our community-wide bonfire on October 28th. I would think that this would be a great way to display the capabilities of this new vehicle. * The lift station at the intersection of Mill Road and Peltier Lake Drive is under construction. The lift station is currently being bypassed with auxiliary pumps. * The Met Council's sewer interceptor project is continuing to make progress. Construction is underway on the lift station building near the entrance to LaMotte Park. The interceptor is currently being jacked underneath 20th Avenue. * Tomorrow evening the Rockin' Hollywoods will be playing outside at Kelly's Korner. The Centerville Lion's will be selling benefit raffle tickets for John Rodewald. If you not show up and I will sell you some raffle tickets. * I have been contacted by the Lino Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce. They have come forward to host a candidate forum for Centerville. I was informed this morning that the event will conducted in the same manner and format as the Lino forum last year. The Chamber will be contacting all candidates over the weekend. They have selected October 23rd, 6:30 at Centerville City Hall. If anyone has any questions they can contact Paul Montain, Tim Rehbine or Julie Schwartz. The Chamber will be contacting the news media to attend this event. * Enjoy your weekend! 10/13/00 Jim March To: WIR Subscribers Subject: Week In Review Week in Review October 19, 2000 Building Permits this Period = 6 Building Permits YTD = 156 New Homes Year to Date = 44 ********************************************************** k************ * * ►** * * * * ***** *** ** *** * * * * ** ** * I'm trying to get a jump on tomorrows work, hence a late thursday edition of the Week in Review. * We had a sanitary sewer forcemain break near the intersection of Mill Road and Peltier Lake Drive. This line is going to be replaced. It is currently a heavily pitted cast iron pipe. The new forcemain will be pvc and will be more resistant to corrosion. The leak was contained and repaired and no sewage escaped downstream into Clearwater Creek. * New park equipment components have arrived to replace the sections of the climber that were vandalized with graffiti from juveniles earlier this summer. * The petition in regards to the dangerous off-ramps at I -35E and Main Street was forwarded to Anoka County. * We have received building plans for the proposed County Bank facility. Craig Bode indicates that electrical was installed to the portable facility today and they hope to be open by the middle of next week. * Sketch plans were received for proposed expansions of the Automotive Driveline building and the Media Junction building on 20th Avenue. ADL is considering an approximate 4000 square foot expansion. Media Junction would like to add a second story to the office portion of the building that they occupy. * Northern Forest Products has begun grading behind their existing building in advance of their proposed 25,000 square foot expansion. * Terry Hannah (Ground Development) stopped in this afternoon to pick up an application for a preliminary plat for the development they are considering south of Center Oaks. * The trail is supposed to be paved tomorrow or Monday in the Hunter's Crossing subdivision. 10/19/00 * The base work on the trail proposed for Acorn Creek Park is supposed to happen over the weekend or on Monday. The dry weather has been cooperating with a lot of our construction projects. * There is a candidate forum scheduled for next Monday night at City Hall at 6:30. This question and answer forum is being sponsored and coordinated by the Lino Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce. This will be broadcast live on the cable access channel. We received the tape of the candidates from the North Metro Media Center last night. We have intentions to broadcast this tape around the clock all weekend over our local access channel. * The last I heard there were only two openings left for teams for Lion's Night Golf. This is scheduled for tomorrow night at 6:30. If you want to golf, contact Bill at Kelly's. * Enjoy your weekend! 10/19/00 7'ha nkyou. L t-itt zi I IL 4 i Created Expressly for `;! � ' J / ° . „ei `.,... Larry Hass by Centervmlle's Parks and Recreation .4 2000 . TheParkv a.nd.Ruxeatfo-w Cammatee' of the. City of CentervWe' would, lCkzto-thank/rigor your Wine, and, guided, tour of the, Pi neNtew Park/BMX Track. We' a pp reciatxr your tune, and, Thankar, agaf w! Cevnte villz'y avui,Recreation, Committee, 4 � t ervZ e 1880 Main Street • Centervi((e, 55038 Established 1857 1880 429 -3232 • Fat (65 1) 429 -8629 October 19, 2000 Mr. Rich DeFoe C/o Sharks Nightclub 3720 East River Road Fridley, MN 55421 Dear Rich, On behalf of the Centerville City Council and the Centerville Parks and Recreation Committee, we would like to sincerely thank you for your generous contribution of the ballfield lights and scoreboard that formerly occupied the Waterworks ball diamond. This is the most generous gift to the City that I have witnessed in the last five years. If you need any papers signed for accounting purposes please let me know. I hope this letter reaches you. This is the only mailing address that I have at this time. Once again, thank you for your generosity. The City looks forward to your family moving into the community. • erely, March City Administrator cc. City Council Park and Recreation Committee C i� p terv � 1880 9bfain Street • Centerville, 911 55038 Established 1857 (651) 429 -3232 • fat (651) 429 -8629 October 9, 2000 Mr. Bill Bisek 7098 Centerville Road Centerville, MN 55038 Dear Mr. Bisek, The Park and Recreation Committee discussed the concept of winter sports leagues at their October regular meeting. The committee is supportive of your desire to see adult sports leagues in the community however, the Park and Recreation Committee will not be sponsoring any City or privately organized leagues for this season. The Park and Recreation Committee plans to further research this issue for future consideration. The Committee believes that at some point in time it will be necessary to have a hired staff person coordinate sporting activities. Until that occurs the Committee is not willing to accept any financial or legal liabilities with privately organized events or leagues. This information is being communicated to you now so that you may decide if you want to privately sponsor any winter leagues or activities. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact myself or the Park and Recreation Committee. On behalf of the Park and Recreation Committee, Jim March City Administrator k ,e, tervi(Ce 1880 'Main Street • Centerville, MN 55038 Established 1857 (6511429 -3232 • Tat (651) 429 -8629 October 10, 2000 Mr. Jon Vondelinde Anoka County Parks and Recreation 550 Bunker Lake Boulevard Andover, MN 55304 Re: Parks and Recreation Committee Members Dear Jon; Included is an updated list of our present Parks and Recreation Committee members for the City of Centerville. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Thank you! Chairperson, Doug Porter 7046 Eagle Trail Centerville, MN 55038 Karla DeVine 1837 Revoir Street Centerville, MN 55038 Wayne LeBlanc 1677 Peltier Lake Drive Centerville, MN 55038 Tedd Peterson 6933 Pheasant Lane Centerville, MN 55038 Brian Walter 1855 Quebec Street Centerville, MN 55038 Sincerely, Jill Lien Parks and Recreation Staff Liaison I 1 i'SOUTH ST. PAUL: ; t.j -,,,- P ' I 1-, tF+t; +l 41 k t$‘131e i'r[.::.r i 1 r ft it took `. years abut' skaters `got' ;own a park 140 in Youths couldn't Aaron Birdsall ,, -It.: ; sails over a 941 tie happier over ' sawhorse Friday 1n = their good fortune at the new g " skateboard and . "1.11 - NATALIE Y. MOORE STAFF WRITER In-line skating park In South St srn Paul, a few o3 %T he kids l in South St. Paul ` are r4 , minutes after it ;skating, falling, tripping and rock- - . opened. Birdsall, byi mg• 15, said he's s 1 But mostly they're happy received juvenile After five years, several meet- r . offense tickets bar ings and even more delays, the ' for skating In .iijyouth' of South St.' Paul finally � ' downtown St . , have a skateboard park. Paul and has been z b• -At Friday's opening at Jefferson � ^ „ placed In the back nil Skate Park, dozens of youth -'alt $ ,r,„ of a South St. 1 boys, all ages — tried out the new %.' .. �Pau1 squad car , bpi wooden ramps built by the city's * ; se ver a l tim es fo r parks and recreation department, skating near that i creating a sweet ending for every- , •r; t ,x I a '. : city's high school, r aas.wa. which he attends. di ; In 1995, a group of young peo Birdsall will work yva pie approached Rich Dippel, parks at the park two , , and m recreation h city could cco build a director, and asked days a week as an oi3 . attendant. He also, skateboard park. It was an uphill � .. h elped build the 6atlle. Officials didn't know it the park. oi, sport was popular enough to war - ;" I!i i rant a park. And the skateboard -'I'` jr3 ers had acquired a bad reputation ((i from skating all over the city. , - CHRIS POLYDORCFE/ PIONEER PRESS Skateboarders were routinely , +;,, stopped by police officers and ' s 0! they irked many residents. Some untouched. But, there wasn't - any an outdoor hockey rink; skate - say unfairly. other place for skaters to hone boarding will be seasonal. In -line Aaron Birdsall, 15, said a few their skills. skaters can also use the park. - - skateboarders vandalized and there - The new park is _located behind Supervision is present when the fore all were labeled as vandals. Jefferson School, where Southview park is open. Officials expect 30 -dr One could find them "skating Boulevard and Second Street youths to use the park during the anyplace they could find chat- meet. South St. Paul invested week and 60 on the weekends. lenges, anyplace where it said no $16,000 in the park; all of the Im just glad we finally got it. ; skateboarding," skateboarding," Dippel said. money came from existing recre- This will prove we're not bad ref t Bleachers, chhrches, schools and a mone y. p tional . The park is a joint kids," said Carton Relitz, 17. - , !n business properties were not left venture with the city's school dis Natalie Y. Moore can be reached at . - trict The department blackto '.� p nmooreeploneerpress.com or (651) ;1-A: • CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 27, 2000 6:00 p.m. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held thei egularly scheduled meeting on September 27, 2000, at City Hall, 1880 Main S•d? -I . PRESENT: Mayor Tom Wilharber Council Member Dick Travis Council Member Terry Sweeney ,� Council Member Linda Broussard Vic er'sI :" Council Member Mari Nelson zi ABSENT: None STAFF: City Administrator, Jim sit es City Attorney, James "BP City Engineer, Toe .i L CALL TO ORDER 3� Mayor W 'teil . er c. ed is Y . e.. b ? , '00i 13 • >r.T.i l is - eting to order at 6:12 . — • II. 'i. a I I % e,t'.y ifs w' ite .9 er> d- • to a. sty a ]t• r WA it I ber as de under Wnfi s es Business a letter from Alexanda House, 14 er.. sc AnoL County 'Gommum Development, and a letter from the inns. • kouse o • ep send ves., imei o on • y ounc e weenev, seconded by Council Member Travis a r . r"ave he a ailiv the noted additions. All in favor. Motion carried it Tnammous . P- i I 1 L H EARING (S) € ' °. 1 r tau ' t . ter Crossing Assessment Hearing if ti r�` 1 ay u ilharber opened the public hearing at 6:13 p.m. M r. Peterson explained to Council all improvements are in place within the trC development with the exception of the streets and curbs. The paving of streets is Page 1 of 12 scheduled for next week. Mr. Peterson explained how the City arrived at the assessments figures. Mr. Peterson stated that the total costs for Hunter's Crossing improvements are $653,613. The developer has paid for half of the costs to extend services down Centerville Road. The remaining half has been divided among individual property owners who also benefited. Kenneth Vanderbeek, 6892 Centerville Road, explained to Council numerous problems he has endured during construction. He lost telephone and cable services on four (4) occasions. At one point the telephone line was dropped onto the power line creating a potentially dangerous situation if his wife or children would have used the telephone. His tractor was damaged, requiring $150 in repairs. The City also removed trees on his property without permission and without an easement to do so. He mentioned to Council that he was aware services were coming but disagrees with treating his lot as two (2) lots and therefore assessing him for same. Mr. Vanderbeek explained due to the elevation of the lot he believes the lot is non - buildable. Mr. Vanderbeek stated that it would be cost prohibitive for him to make the property saleable, and he did not intend on doing so and would not divide or split the property. Larry Woiak, 6925 Centerville Road, stated he intends on contesting the assessment believing that the cost is in excess of the increased property value the services will bring. Dale Greenwadt, 4697 - 316 Lane, Stacy, Minnesota, stated that the property he owns on Centerville Road is rental property and his renters did not provide the notice of assessments to him. He was unaware of the assessment in time to submit his petition to contest the assessment. Mayor Wilharber questioned Attorney Hoeft that due to Greenwadt's circumstances, could Mr. Greenwadt still be allowed to file a petition against the assessment. City Attorney Hoeft indicated Mr. Greenwadt would be allowed to file a petition. Council Member Sweeney asked whether the City had agreed to replace the trees. Mr. Vanderbeek said they had. Council Member Sweeney then asked if the trees were in the City right -of -way. Mr. Vanderbeek stated they were not. Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned Mr. Peterson if it is standard procedure to assess someone for two (2) stubs if the lot could potentially be divided. Mr. Peterson confirmed. Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if the stub could be removed if that was the wish of the property owner. Mr. Peterson confirmed. Page 2 of 12 Mr. Woiak stated that the assessments are in excess of replacing the existing well. Mr. Greenwadt stated he believed the price to replace an existing well be approximately $4,000. Mr. Woiak stated that his well is only 12 years old and he believes it will be a long time before it fails. Council Member Broussard Vickers explained to the property owners that they are paying up front for their next service when their wells fail. She told them that wells do fail quite regularly and the cost to replace a well would exceed what they have been assessed for services. She stated she did not like the original numbers and feels the Council has shifted as much of the financial burden onto the developer as possible. She then explained to the property owners that the City can assess them if the property owner has a realized value, and she believes they will realize a value when connecting to these services. Council Member Nelson inquired if the assessment amount was divided among the property owners by adding up the total number of feet of pipe for the development and Centerville Road. Mr. Peterson explained the property owners are being assessed for half of the cost to extend services on Centerville Road only. Mr. Woiak told the City he bas incurred numerous costs to clear the sewer pipe at his residence and will submit a bill to the City to be reimbursed for the same as he feels it is their responsibility. Mr. Vanderbeek inquired if he would have to connect to the services as soon as they become available. Mr. Peterson stated he would need to connect to sewer service within a year of becoming available. Council Member Broussard Vickers inquired when the services would be available. Mr. Peterson told her January 1, 2001. Mr. Peterson stated the amounts being assessed are in keeping with standard assessments for similar services in other communities. Mayor Wilharber inquired as to why Mr. Woiak's services were previously placed into the lot at an angle. Mr. Peterson explained that previous piping was temporary until services were extended on Centerville Road. Mayor Wilharber noted the previous owner of Mr. Woiak's property was hooked up to City sewer for free because no one at City Hall knew the property was hooked to the City's sewer system. A question was raised by several property owners as to why property owners with homes backing up to Centerville Road were not assessed. Mr. Peterson explained only those properties with homes facing Centerville Road were assessed. The residents whose homes back up to Centerville Road will be assessed when services come down the street their homes face. Page 3of12 Mr. March provided paper to the property owners who had stated they wished to oppose the assessment. The property owners in opposition placed their names and addresses on the paper and turned them in to Mr. March. Mayor Wilharber closed the public hearing at 6:55 p.m. Mayor Wilharber stated he understands the property owners' position as he will be in their position in several years when services reach him. Council Member Travis indicated that he recently has been assessed for services, is fully aware of their costs and believes them to be fair and reasonable. Council Member Sweeney indicated the assessment is less costly than replacing an existing well and the developer has bore a larger portion of the costs to bring services down Centerville Road. Council Member Sweeney also stated that property owners in question would benefit from the services and concurred that the assessments were fair and reasonable. Council Member Broussard Vickers addressed the issue of Mr. Vanderbeek being assessed for two (2) stubs at his property. She indicated the price for one (1) acre lots is approximately $60,000 and believes the property's value could and would be enhanced to be buildable. Ms. Broussard Vickers stated that in her opinion, having the stub run to the property during this time would be less expensive than having it run in the future. Ms. Broussard Vickers concurred that the assessments were fair and reasonable. Council Member Nelson told the Council she usually leans toward individuals with her opinions rather than toward the developers; however, in this case she believes the developer has been more than fair and concurred with the other members of Council. Mayor Wilharber stated that assessments are high due to the cost of labor and supplies and that these same costs will continue to increase. Mayor Wilharber concurred with the other members of Council. Mr. Vanderbeek stated he had received an estimate for costs to connect to the City's sewer system in the amount of $10,000. Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned whether Mr. Vanderbeek wished installation of the second stub. Mr. Vanderbeek declined. Mr. Vanderbeek stated he could not afford the $10,000 assessment and questioned the option of deferring connection for several years. City Attorney Hoeft stated that deferral of special assessments is an option; however, the City would prefer to discuss this issue as the assessment process continues. Page 4 of 12 City Attorney Hoeft advised the Council to approve the resolution as presented. He indicated modifications may be included as part of settlement discussions in the future. Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Broussard Vickers to approve Resolution 00 -21. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. IV. APPEARANCES /AWARDS Mr. Bruce Malec, Division Manager — Waste Management Mr. Bruce Malec introduced Mr. Gary Boium to the Council as Waste Management's new Municipal Marketing Manager. Mr. Malec stated that Mr. Boium would make periodic visits to ensure that quality services are being provided to the community. Mr. Malec questioned whether Council had any issues of concern relating to the haulers service and Council reiterated that they are pleased with the services they and residents are receiving. Mr. Malec thanked the Council for the compliments Waste Management received and for the opportunity to service the community. Mayor Wilharber thanked Mr. Malec for attending. A consensus was reached to hear the Northern Forest Products Abatement from Unfinished Business at this point in the meeting. Northern Forest Products Abatement Paul McDowell, Northern Forest Products, addressed the Council and outlined plans for the expansion of his business. Mr. McDowell presented Council with sketches of a proposed expansion plan for the current Northem Forest Products facility. Mr. McDowell stated that they have out grown their current facility and expansion would provide a more productive /efficient facility. Mr. McDowell also indicated that Northern Forest Products has an additional site outside of Centerville and expansion of the current facility would allow combining of the two facilities. Mr. McDowell stated that the proposed expansion would be 22,000 or 23,000 square feet and cost approximately $600,000 or $700,000. Mayor Wilharber inquired if the detention pond would be able to handle the runoff from the expansion area. Mr. McDowell said he would rely on the recommendation of the City Engineer. Page 5 of 12 Council Member Broussard Vickers inquired how far from the back of Mr. McDowell's lot the building would be positioned. Mr. McDowell said he believed it was approximately 70 or 80 feet from the property line. Mr. March noted the public hearing on the five -year tax abatement is scheduled for October 11, 2000. Mayor Wilharber inquired as to how many employees Mr. McDowell planned to add with the expansion. Mr. McDowell stated five (5) or six (6) within the next five (5) years, depending on business. Mayor Wilharber questioned the amount of off site business being combined in the expanded facility. Mr. McDowell stated approximately seventy (70) percent of the business would be combined and the other portion would remain at that site due to rail transportation conveniences. V. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES The following changes were requested by Council: Page 2, fourth paragraph change "Ramsey County" to "Anoka County", Page 22 change "QUAD meeting" to "QUAD Community Press ", Page 20, eighth paragraph beginning with "Mr. Palzer indicated" change the paragraph to read: "Mr. Palzer indicated there would be new regulations forthcoming regarding lots of one (1) acre or more and Council wanted to comply with the upcoming regulations." Also in the same paragraph change "Rice Creek" to "MPCA ". Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis to approve the September 13, 2000. City Council Meeting, Minutes with the noted chances. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS The City of Centerville September 14, through September 27, 2000 City Attorney Hoeft discussed a pending case before the Minnesota Supreme Court he is arguing and has been preparing for. The case is a DUI case in which the drivers vehicle was forfeited and storage costs were incurred. The person whose vehicle was impounded is attempting to get the City to pay the storage costs of $6,000. City Attorney Hoeft noted that his most recent billings included additional time due to these circumstances. Page 6 of 12 Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Broussard Vickers to approve the expenditures for the City from September 14, 2000 through September 27, 2000. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Centennial Fire District Expenses Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Broussard Vickers to approve the Centennial Fire District expenditures in the amount of $5,583.75. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 20 Avenue Water /Sewer Final Pay Estimate Mr. Peterson indicated the project has been completed since 1998 and the City has been withholding payment from Bonine Excavating, Inc., until several issues were resolved. Mr. Peterson stated that Ms. Nancy Bonine recently contacted him and indicated willingness to waive payment of $14,969.14 that was at issue and requested payment of the $21,288.78. Mr. Peterson recommended payment of $21,288.78. Mayor Wilharber inquired to whom the check should be made payable to. Mr. March indicated he is waiting for instruction from City Attorney Hoeft. City Attorney Hoeft noted that the City has received two (2) separate Notices of Levy's against monies owed to Bonine Excavating and the two agencies will be receiving the money in lieu of Bonine. Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis to approve payment of $21,288.78 as the seventh (7) and final payment on the 20 Avenue water /sewer utility improvements. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. VII. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS Council Member Nelson inquired as to the status of the Salazar's dogs, Nikita and Dakota. Council Member Nelson stated that she has driven past the Salazar's house and noted the pen was not in compliance with Council requirements. Mr. March reported to Council the Salazars began construction of a fence impeding the street right -of -way by one (1) foot without applying for a variance, and the City placed a stop work order on the site. Subsequent to numerous telephone conversation with Mr. Salazar, Mr. Salazar has assured Mr. March that he will keep the dogs in the house excluding relief periods. Mr. March stated that he attempted to mail a certified letter to the Salazars in regards to non - compliance of the dog kennel; however, it was not picked up at the post office. Mr. March stated he had a Centennial Lakes Police Officer serve the letter on a juvenile at Page 7of12 the residence. The Community Service Officer returned the next day and picked up the signed card acknowledging receipt of the letter. Mr. March explained to Council the letter informed the Salazars of the requirements of Council in regards to the kennel, and also noted the procedures for applying for a variance to continue construction of the fence. Council Member Nelson questioned Mr. March if the police could patrol, and if they were to notice the dogs out side of the kennel, could the dogs be seized and further action taken. Mr. March referred the question to City Attorney Hoeft. City Attorney Hoeft indicated it would need to be determined if the Salazars were in violation of the requirements prior to action being taken. Mr. Hoeft stated there is no reason why the Centennial Lakes Police Department (CLPD) could not be asked to keep an eye on the dogs. Council Member Nelson stated she would like to make the CLPD aware of the situation and ask them to routinely check the property. Mayor Wilharber, as police liaison, stated he would contact CLPD and forward the request. VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Storm Sewer Re- alignment — Lloyd Drilling (1873 Main Street) Mr. Peterson recommended that the east half of the site drain east towards Shad Avenue. The runoff can be collected in a storm sewer catch basin at Shad Avenue and Main Street, flow east in the ditch, then flow south under the highway to an existing pond at the southeast comer of Main Street and the Fire Station driveway. The water will be treated prior to continuing southward to Clearwater Creek. The west half of the site will receive adequate treatment on -site in the existing highway ditch and the grassy area around the "beehive" catch basin at the north property line. Mr. Peterson stated it is not necessary to redirect the storm water flowing in the existing pipe south under the highway and into the small pond south of the City Hall parking lot. Council noted there has been a water problem on Shad Avenue in the past and requested that Mr. Peterson check with Dave Lutz on Shad Avenue to make sure redirecting the sewer in this manner will not cause further water problems for the residents on Shad Avenue. Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis, to approve the Storm Sewer Realignment at 1873 Main St. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Letter from Frank Ball, Director, Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division, Minnesota Department of Public Safety. Page 8 of 12 Mr. March reviewed with Council the letter received from the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division and requested direction from the Council as to how the City should respond. Council Member Sweeney inquired if this was the first known violation for the Trio Inn and, if so, what the business has done to ensure the violation will not occur again. Council Member Sweeney stated that in his opinion, if this incident is the first violation he would prefer not to fine the business. City Attorney Hoeft told the Council they were under no obligation, based on the letter, to impose a civil penalty. He indicated the letter should not be perceived as a threat to impose a penalty but noted the State of Minnesota does have the authority to impose a fine whether the City chooses to or not. Council Member Sweeney stated he would rather impose a nominal fine and not pull the business' license than have the State impose a higher fine and revoke the business' license. Council Member Broussard Vickers inquired as to how someone can be fined for being charged with an offense, but found not guilty. Attorney Hoeft explained the law does allow for civil penalty when you are charged with an offense. He used the example of when someone is arrested for DUI they are charged with an offense and lose their civil driving privilege. In some cases they are found not guilty but they have still lost their driving privilege. Mayor Wilharber noted the Council had waited until the matter was resolved in the courts and ruled that because the bartender was found not guilty they would not impose a fine. City Attorney Hoeft explained the State response recognizes there is a difference between being found not guilty of the offense and being innocent of noncompliance with the law. Mayor Wilharber indicated he would prefer the City impose a penalty rather than the State. Council Member Nelson stated she did not like the tone of the letter and expressed a desire to revisit the idea of fining the business. She indicated she felt that in light of the fact the business owner is not denying the violation, she feels there should have been a penalty imposed. Mayor Wilharber clarified the owner of the bar was not at the establishment when the violation occurred and the bartender was the one charged with the offense. City Attorney Hoeft said it may be possible to impose a nominal fine on the business to pre -empt action by the State. City Attorney Hoeft offered to research M.S. Chapter 340A.415 and bring a definitive answer to the Council at the next meeting. Page 9 of 12 Council Member Broussard Vickers noted her dislike of the tone of the letter. She stated if the consensus of the Council was not to fine the business she proposes a letter be drafted to the State in response outlining the fact that the City has chosen not to impose a penalty and give the reasons the Council choose to decline. Motion by Council Member Travis, seconded by Council Member Sweeney to table the drafting of a response to the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division to the October 11, 2000 Council Meeting to allow time for City Attorney Hoeft to review M.S. Chapter 340A.415. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Letter from Alexandra House Mayor Wilharber read a letter from Alexandra House requesting the Council declare the month of October Domestic Violence Awareness Month. Motion by Council Member Travis, seconded by Council Member Sweeney to declare October Domestic Violence Awareness Month. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Letter from Anoka County Community Development Mayor Wilharber read a letter from Anoka County Community Development proposing modifying the way Community Development Block Grant funds (CDBG) are distributed throughout the County. Mr. March explained to Council he had attended a meeting regarding the matter and said under the proposed modifications, Centerville will compete with cities of comparable size for CDBG funds. Letter from Minnesota House of Representatives Mayor Wilharber read a letter received from the Minnesota House of Representatives regarding a series of town meetings scheduled to discuss proposed modifications to, and the effectiveness of the Metropolitan Council. IX. NEW BUSINESS St. Genevieve's Land Inquiry Letter The Council discussed a letter drafted by Mr. March to St. Genevieve's Catholic Church requesting church officials meet with City officials to discuss plans for future redevelopment. Page 10 of 12 Mayor Wilharber requested that a notation be included that he had spoken with Father Fitzgerald in regards to this matter in the past. Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Nelson to approve sending the letter with the noted addition to St. Genevieve's Catholic Church. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. X. CONSENT AGENDA XL COMMITTEE REPORTS Mayor Wilharber reported he was unable to attend the Police Commission meeting but had visited with the Chief of Police and will prepare a written report for Council. XII. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Mr. March reported he received a letter from Mr. Sheehy who is interested in donating 15 acres of land to the City. There are special assessments pending on the property in the amount of $74,792 and Mr. Sheehy has agreed to pay 25% of the assessments. Mr. March told Council he visually surveyed the site and feels it is a beautiful nature area for a possible park or trail. The site also has potential for a water tower which would be visible from I35. Mr. March stated that soil borings could be done if Council desired. Mayor Wilharber stated he would like to proceed as there are multiple ways the City could use the property. Council Member Travis inquired as to whether there was a wetland delineation. Mr. March told him Anoka County has declared it a wetland. The consensus was to research the donation further. Motion by Council Member Nelson, seconded by Council Member Broussard Vickers to accept the donation of land from Mr. Sheehy. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. March reported there is a "Meet the Candidates" program scheduled to be taped for the cable access channel. Mr. March stated that he has requested a copy of same specific to Centerville. Council Member Sweeney requested anyone not receiving cable to contact him so he could bring it to the attention of AT & T Broadband. Mayor Wilharber reported that on several occasions he has discussed possible trail connections with the City of Hugo. Mayor Wilharber stated that if water Page 11 of 12 services and trail connections were made with neighboring communities, (i.e., Hugo and Lino Lakes) it would be cost - effective. XIII. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Broussard Vickers to adjourn the September 27, 2000 City Council Meeting u tv at 8:33 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed by: Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary TimeSaver O, ffSite Secretarial, Inc. Page 12 of 12 CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 11, 2000 6:00 p.m. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City of Centerville held their regularly sc ed meeting on October 11, 2000, at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. s; PRESENT: Mayor Tom Wilharber fi Council Member Dick Travis iit Council Member Terry Sweeney (arrived 6:01 p.m.) / # ii P Council Member Mari Nelson / ; j = ABSENT: Council Member Linda Broussard Vickers 3. 1 1 STAFF: City Administrator, Jim March _ 3 City Attorney, James Hoeft : + " I City Engineer, Tom P- s rson t,. ; L CALL TO ORDE • k Il Y y Mayor Wilharber c: led the • t.ber 1 C0 , }' Co ncil eating to order at 6:00 p.m. A - r ?: 1I. SET , NDA ° K 4 o ■ . CI.. n emb • r vis • .0 ded b, ouncil Member Nelson to a I rove the a Tfaniftria r t T it to: e. ried unanimousl . , i ll III. P B o E i 1 C 1 • . e t le I . r i J is ii . - , � . 4 t :. k, and Dive SXannon, Color Sign, appeared before Council to review t tt t i sub i :- . a e r.sliest fo. sign to be placed at the northwest corner of the intersection o ri. in n: I St Avenue. . ) . Bode explained that County Bank is requesting a larger, t. lr si: d i • cl • - a time and temperature reader board. The size exceeds Ordinance #4's sign r••• i • m - •.. aid the time and temperature reader board is not addressed. Mr. Bode explained that t - • -s t:t revised, schematic for the sign shows a two (2) foot taller sign than previously p ,o. o•ed and includes an instant cash sign below the main sign. Mr. Bode also explained that the pro: os- i sign would be approximately 26.58 feet tall and two hundred eleven (211) square feet in t.i size. The Planning and Zoning Commission denied recommending this variance and consensus was that the sign section of Ordinance #4 be amended to create a special sign district for commercial property located east of 20 Avenue and on both sides of Main Street. This would allow businesses to have similar signs to the City of Lino Lakes'. Mayor Wilharber opened the public hearing at 6:02 p.m. Page 1 of 14 Mayor Wilharber questioned the desired installation date of the sign. Mr. Bode stated that County Bank would like to install the footings prior to the ground freezing and prior to their anticipated opening date of February, 2001. P g ry Mayor Wilharber questioned whether Mr. March felt the Planning and Zoning Commission intended to modify the ordinance to allow larger signs and Mr. March stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission had not determined the proper modifications; however, consensus was that the current sign section of Ordinance #4 was too restrictive. Council Member Sweeney questioned the proposed sign dimensions comparative to others in Lino Lakes. Mr. Shannon, Color Sign, stated that the Amoco sign is taller and the square footage of the sign is larger than what the Bank is proposing. Mr. Bode stated that the sign is similar to signs the bank currently has installed at their branch offices in Forest Lake and Center City. Mr. Bode stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission expressed concern in regards to the proposed reader board and the possibility of visual distractions. Mr. Bode stated that the bank intents to use a color of light that is pleasing to the eye and not distracting. Mr. Bode also stated that if the City desires, "traveling messages" would not be used. Mayor Wilharber stated that County Bank's request comes at a time when the City recognizes that the sign section of Ordinance #4 is inadequate and is in the process of being amended. Mr. Wilharber stated that it was his opinion that the City needs to accommodate businesses that come to town and provide a positive approach to their signage. Mayor Wilharber felt that by approving the variance it would show good faith on behalf of the City. Mr. Bode ensured the Council that the sign would be in proportion to the building and would not look out of place. Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis to close the public hearine. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Wilharber closed the public hearing at 6:10 P.M. 2. Hasiak Variance Request Mr. and Mrs. Stan Hasiak, 6994 Centerville Road, appeared before Council to review their submitted variance request to enlarge the exterior and enhance the interior of an existing pole barn structure that exists on their property. The existing structure exceeds Ordinance #4's Accessory Structure requirements and is a non - conforming structure. Mr. Hasiak began constructing a "lean- to" addition to the north side of the structure and interior improvements. Paul Palzer, Building Official, issued a stop work order on the project and has requested that interior improvements be removed to allow proper inspection. Both construction improvements, interior and exterior, were started without building permits. The Planning and Zoning Commission motioned to recommend granting a variance for the interior improvements, but indicated that the work would have to be inspected and the appropriate building permits issued. The Planning and Zoning Commission denied the exterior improvements. Mayor Wilharber opened the public hearing at 6:10 p.m. Page 2 of 14 Mrs. Hasiak stated their willingness to remove the "lean-to" exterior improvement and that their primary request was to be allowed to make interior improvements similar to other garages located within the City. Mrs. Hasiak explained that the house located on the property has a crawl space unsuitable for storage due to water, sewer and foundation damage. Mrs. Hasiak also explained that they intended on using the existing structure as a garage. Mrs. Hasiak stated that they currently do not have a garage. Council Member Nelson questioned whether the issue involved removing the non - conforming structure. Mayor Wilharber explained the variance request was concerning the interior improvements and the exterior "lean -to" addition to the non - conforming structure. Mayor Wilharber stated that the non - conforming structure had been located on the parcel for many years. Mr. March indicated the non - conforming structure has been grand fathered in and may stay on the property; however, a variance is needed to improve the structure. Council Member Nelson questioned if the variance was denied, would the interior improvements and exterior construction need to be removed. Mr. March confirmed that it would. Council Member Nelson questioned Mrs. Hasiak as to the status of the improvements. Mrs. Hasiak indicated that the interior has had a cement floor poured, wiring run, insulated, and sheet rocked. Mrs. Hasiak also stated these items needed to be done to convert the pole barn to a garage. Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis to close the public hearin. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Wilharber closed the public hearing at 6:17 p.m. 3. Salazar Variance Request Mr. and Mrs. Pedro Salazar, 7336 Old Mill Road, appeared before Council to review their submitted variance request allowing them to construct a six (6) foot, wooden, privacy fence in their rear yard. Mr. And Mrs. Salazar explained that their property is on a corner lot and according to Ordinance #4 they have two (2) front yards. Mr. Salazar has begun construction of the privacy fence one (1) foot into the road right -of -way. The Salazars presented Council with two (2) letters from neighboring residents indicting their approval of the placement of the fence. The Planning and Zoning Commission is in the process of amending and defining the language relating to comer lots and denied the variance. Mr. Salazar stated that it would be cost prohibitive for him to relocate the fence and existing sprinkler line. Mr. Salazar also stated that it was his intention to provide a safer environment for his neighbors and his dogs. Mr. Salazar expressed the need to complete the fencing prior to making the improvements to the kennel as required previously by Council. Mayor Wilharber questioned whether allowing the fence to remain in the City' road right -of -way would interfere with public utilities. Mr. Palzer, Building Official/Public Works Director, indicated that utilities were run underneath the sidewalk within the Salazar's development so it would not interfere with same. Page 3 of 14 Council Member Sweeney questioned whether the old or new Ordinance #4 was in effect at the time Mr. Salazar began construction of the fence. Mr. March stated that Mr. Salazar had begun construction of the fence prior to the new ordinance. Mayor Wilharber questioned whether there was any opposition to the fence from others in the neighborhood. Mr. March stated that he was unaware of opposition to the fence and noted the two (2) letters presented by the Salazars, Council Member Nelson indicated she had received a complaint from the neighbor directly across the street from the Salazars expressing concern that the fence is too close to the sidewalk. Mr. Salazar indicated he is obligated to keeping the sidewalk clear and will continue to do so. Mayor Wilharber questioned Mr. Salazar as to snow removal, fence obstruction of same and indicated that disposing of snow into the street was not allowed. Mr. Salazar indicated his snowblower would blow the snow up and over the fence into his backyard. Mr. Salazar stated his willingness to sign any document the City would require of him to acknowledge his financial responsibility for any repairs to the fence should it be damaged or need to be removed if the City allowed it to remain in its current location. Council Member Nelson questioned the purpose of completing the fence prior to fulfilling the Council's previous requirement in regards to the kennel. Mayor Wilharber made a point of order comment indicating questions regarding the kennel were not relative to the Variance Public Hearing. Council Member Nelson indicated her question was meant to clarify the comments Mr. Salazar had previously made. Mr. Salazar stated that in order to cement the floor of the kennel, it needs to be partially disassembled and the cement would then need to dry prior to reassembly. Mr. Salazar estimated the process to take approximately one week and during this time, the dogs would not have an enclosure. Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Mayor Wilharber to close the public hearing. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Wilharber closed the public hearing at 6:27 p.m. 4. Northern Forest Products — Five Year Tax Abatement Mr. March indicated the official public hearing on the tax abatement was scheduled for November 8, 2000. He told Council he had been working with Ehlers and Associates and Mr. McDowell, Northern Forest Products, to establish the proposed increase in taxable market valuation for the proposed expansion. Accurate figures should be available for the October 25, 2000 Council meeting. No comments were heard from the audience. Page 4 of 14 Motion by Council Member Nelson, seconded by Council Member Sweeney to close the public hearing_ All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Wilharber closed the public hearing at 6:29 p.m. IV. APPEARANCES /AWARDS None. V. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES Council Member Sweeney requested the following changes: On Page 7 of 12 the motion concerning the final payment on the 20` Avenue water /sewer utility improvements add the sentence after the word "improvements ". "The check should be made payable to whomever City Attorney Hoeft deems appropriate." On Page 11 of 12 in the paragraph concerning cable change from "anyone not receiving cable" to "anyone not receiving the government access channel through their cable company ". Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis to approve the September 27, 2000, City Council Meeting Minutes with the noted changes. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS The City of Centerville September 28, through October 4, 2000 Motion by Council Member Travis, seconded by Council Member Nelson to approve the expenditures for the City from September 28, 2000 through October 4, 2000. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Centennial Fire District Expenses Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis to approve the Centennial Fire District expenditures in the amount of $3,436.70. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Pay Estimate Number 2 — Hunter's Crossing Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Nelson to approve Pay Estimate Number 2 on the Hunter's Crossing Development in the amount of $199,943.79. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. VII. PETITIONS AND COMPLAINTS Council Member Nelson stated she had received several complaints regarding a water testing fee on residents 3` quarter utility bills. Mr. March stated that the City is allowed, by State law, to recoup this fee once per year. Mr. Palzer stated that the City is required to take daily samples and test them internally. Additional monthly, quarterly and annually samples are tested at an off -site lab to ensure safe drinking water requirements are met. Page 5 of 14 Mayor Wilharber questioned whether residents had been informed of this charge. Mr. Palzer 9 g r e stated he did not believe information had been provided to residents concerning this issue other than the fee placement on individual utility bills. Mayor Wilharber requested that staff place an article in the next LeJournal in regards to this item. Mr. March stated that Mr. Wayne LeBlanc, Parks and Recreation Committee member, had Yn � , brought to his attention the fact that the trail in Hunter's Crossing would be connecting to the Anoka County Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park and perhaps the City's trail should be widened to ten (10) feet to coincide with same. Mr. March stated he visually inspected same and believes the trail could be paved out to nine and one half (9 `V2) feet without any significant costs incurred other than the cost of the extra bituminous. Mr. March clarified that Mr. LeBlanc was not speaking on behalf of the Parks and Recreation Committee. Mayor Wilharber questioned whether the City or the developer would incur the additional expenditures relating to widening the trail. Mr. Peterson, City Engineer, indicated the additional burden would be the developer's responsibility. Mr. Peterson estimated the additional cost to be $1,400. Mayor Wilharber questioned the Parks and Recreation Committee's decision on this matter. Council Member Sweeney stated it was his understanding that the Committee wanted to set a minimum width standard for parks in the new developments; however, the Committee was unaware that the Hunter's Crossing trail would connect to the Anoka County Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park. Council Member Sweeney stated that the Committee was more concerned with the quality of the trail rather than the width of same. Mayor Wilharber stated that there has been a considerable amount of time planning within the City and other cities for consistent trail ways. Council Member Sweeney stated if it was the intention of the City to create a trail that crosses the City from east to west then he believed a wider trail would be more accessible and easier to use. Mayor Wilharber questioned the additional cost for maintaining a larger than planned trail. Mr. Palzer stated that there would be additional costs involved in maintaining the trail; however, they would not exceed the benefit and felt that the costs would be minimal. Mayor Wilharber mentioned the trail in Hunter's Crossing was being created over roots of trees and questioned if the roots should have been removed in order to prevent them from growing back through the trail. Mr. Peterson stated that typically roots grow downward and with the gravel and bituminous over the top, there should be not problems. Council Member Nelson stated her desire to have consistent trail ways within the community. Consensus was to add Widening the Hunter's Crossing Development Trail as number 10 under New Business on the agenda. Mr. March stated that he had received a letter from residents residing at 1760 Center Street, indicating that the drain tile underneath their driveway had settled and the driveway needed to be Page 6of14 repaired. Mr. Palzer stated that the driveways in that area have been a reoccurring problem due to frost and heaving. Mr. Palzer stated that the City has previously paid to repair same. Mayor Wilharber requested that Mr. March research this issue and provide information to Council and residents experiencing this problem. Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis to add discussion of the driveways on Center Street to the agenda for the next City Council Meeting. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Wilharber stated that he had received some complaints concerning animals running at large and pet owners not removing fecal matter from their animals. Mayor Wilharber urged animal owners to be responsible and clean up after their animal(s) and not allow their animals to run at large. Mayor Wilharber stated he attended the ten (10) year anniversary gathering for the Anoka County Traveler. Mayor Wilharber also stated that he questioned how service to Centerville residents could be improved and the Traveler indicated they have serviced several residents in Centerville and suggested placing their number in a newsletter to heighten awareness. Mayor Wilharber stated he received a complaint concerning the price of admission to Anoka County and Washington County parks. Anoka County informed him that they do not offer a discount rate for seniors; however, they do offer an annual pass which would allow unlimited access to parks and provide discount admission to Hennepin County parks. Mayor Wilharber requested that price information be placed in the next LeJournal. Mayor Wilharber stated he had a meeting with John Olson, Anoka County Highway Department, and discussed connecting the trail way on the east side of Centerville Lake to the Anoka County Rice Creek Regional Park trail way system. Mr. Olson stated that a feasibility study would need to be completed by the City. Mayor Wilharber also questioned the upgrading of Main Street and anticipated widening of same. Mr. Olson stated that it would be approximately 15 years before those improvements would be made. Mayor Wilharber suggested that additional senior housing was needed and felt that this area needed additional attention. Mr. March said there is a possibility of receiving property back from the County and working with a private developer to bring senior housing to the City. Mayor Wilharber stated he had spoken with the Anoka County Attorney, Robert Johnson, concerning a rash of juvenile crimes within the City. In June, the elementary school was vandalized in the amount of $25,000, a home under construction in the Deer Pass Development was vandalized, juveniles are loitering and blocking traffic on Main Street and there were thirty- one (31) tire slashings in August. Mayor Wilharber stated to Mr. Johnson that people who reside in Centerville feel this behavior is unacceptable and are willing to work with the County Attorney to deter criminal activity in the future. Mayor Wilharber stated that the area surrounding the old Public Works site is an eyesore and needs to be cleaned up. Mr. March stated that Mr. Palzer is working on the area and several things were removed today. Page 7of14 Mayor Wilharber stated that he had spoken with the Chief of Police regarding grant funds available for lighting city parks that had been mentioned by the Public Works Department and the Chief was unaware of funds being available for this purpose. The Chief also stated that two (2) to three (3) police vehicles would be parked at the new Public Works site. VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement — Trio Inn (tabled from the September 27, 2000 meeting) — Legal Counsel Report A letter from the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division was discussed at the last meeting. The letter referenced an alleged liquor violation stemming from the Trio Inn. At that meeting, the item was tabled to allow the City Attorney to review the statutes in regards to enforcement provisions by the State. Consensus was not to fine the establishment for the alleged violation. However, since the meeting, Mr. March has discussed this matter with Mr. Paul Montain, (Owner, Trio Inn) and stated that even if the City did not elect to issue a civil penalty, the State could levy a penalty against the Trio Inn. Mr. Montain indicated his willingness to donate $200 to $300 to the City of Centerville or the Centennial Lakes Police Department in further support of the work that they are doing to curtail underage liquor consumption. City Attorney Hoeft stated that upon reviewing the statute governing this issue, it clearly states that the State can impose a penalty, in addition to the City if they choose, provided the total amount of the penalty does not exceed $2,000. Mayor Wilharber questioned whether the City Attorney was aware of the State enforcing a penalty as a matter of course, if the City has penalized the business. City Attorney Hoeft indicated most cities have a guideline established for when an alleged liquor violation takes place. Thereby, making it easy for the city to refer to the guidelines and apply the proper fine to the offense. Mr. March stated that Mr. Montain made it clear that he does not condone this behavior at his establishment and would provide proper education to his employees to ensure that a similar violation would not happen in the future. Council Member Sweeney suggested that Council discuss this matter at a work session and prepare guidelines that would assist in this area for future reference. Mr. Hoeft stated that fining a business $200 or $300 would be in keeping with guidelines of other cities for first time offenses. Council Member Nelson stated that it was her understanding that Council voted previously not to fine the business owner and feels even though she personally voted to fine the business, the original vote of Council should stand. Attorney Hoeft stated that there were no guarantees that the State would not fine a business in addition to any fines the City may impose. Mayor Wilharber indicated he would be in favor of fining the Trio Inn an amount not to exceed $300 and the drafting of a letter, by the City, stating that they have imposed a fine. It is hopeful that this letter would attempt to curtail the State from imposing additional fines. Page 8 of 14 Motion by Mayor Wilharber, seconded by Council Member Travis to fine the Trio Inn in the amount of $300 and to forward the $300 to the Centennial Lakes Police Department to assist efforts in curtailing underage liquor consumption. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. PC. NEW BUSINESS 1. County Bank Variance Request Council Member Travis questioned whether Mr. Shannon, Color Sign, had researched neighboring cities' ordinances to determine if their signs were in keeping with those ordinances. Mr. Shannon indicated he had done so and submitted a report to Mr. March. Motion by Council Member Travis, seconded by Council Member Nelson to approve the County Bank sign variance. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 2, Hasiak Variance Request Council Member Sweeney questioned whether the recommendation of' the Planning and Zoning Commission was to allow the interior improvements to the building but to deny the exterior expansion. Mr. March indicated that was correct. Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Nelson to approve the Hasiak variance request allowing interior improvements to the non- conforming structure and denying exterior expansion improvements. The Hasiaks are required to obtain the required inspections and building permits. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Salazar Variance Request Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Mayor Wilharber to approve the Salazar variance request to allow for the six (6) foot, wood, privacy fence and for the fence to remain in the City right -of -way provided Mr. Salazar sign a document accepting full financial responsibility for any damages or removal of the fence from the City right -of -way_ City Attorney Hoeft noted a stipulation should be added to the motion to provide that Mr. Salazar sign a document accepting full financial responsibility for any costs incurred for damage to or removal of the fence. Mr. Sweeney requested a sentence concerning that matter be added to his motion. Council Member Travis indicated he had driven by the residence and feels the cost to move the fence would be minimal due to the fact there were only two (2) corner posts installed. He indicated the sprinkler issue is merely moving a few sprinkler heads, which is relatively easy. Mayor Wilharber indicated he did not feel the resident should incur additional costs to move the fence when he was originally given misinformation by a representative of the City. Mayor Wilharber stated that he believed the fence is not far enough into the City's road right -of -way to cause any real issue and he is in favor of the variance. Council Member Nelson stated that she sympathizes with the Salazars as they are trying to do the right thing, but does not feel that the variance requirements have been met. Page 9 of 14 Mayor Wilharber called for a vote on the motion. Ayes — 2 (Wilharber and Sweeney) Nays — 2 (Travis and Nelson). The motion failed for lack of a majority. c Member Travis indicated he is t s to the fence, b t' concerned t the fence is Council Memb r T av s not opposed ed o h u is tha PP built in the City's road right -of -way. Mayor Wilharber questioned the options the Salazars had due to Councils lack of majority. Mr. Hoeft indicated the Council could rant the variance request for the six (6) foot, wood, privacy o c g q () >P Y fence provided it is not in the City's road right -of -way, allowing the Salazars to continue the proj ect. Motion by Council Member Travis, seconded by Council Member Nelson to grant the variance request for the six (6) foot, wood, privacy fence provided it is not in the City's road right-of-way. Council Member Sweeney expressed his concern that the City may be imposing a hardship on the residents by not granting the variance. Mr. Salazar has been required by the City to meet certain specification in regards to keeping his dogs and has agreed to add fencing to make the neighbors more comfortable and to keep children separated from his dogs. Council Member Sweeney stated that requiring Mr. Salazar to move the fence would require additional monies to be expended by Mr. Salazar, which he has indicated he does not have. Therefore, Council Member Sweeney would like to see the variance approved. Mayor Wilharber stated that there would be a Council Member absent at the next meeting also. He then stated that he understood the opposition to the variance request concerning the City's road right -of -way but noted Mr. Salazar had agreed to be financially responsible for any costs incurred due to the fences location in the City's road right -of -way. Mr. Salazar stated he should have been able to rely upon the infonnation provided to him by the City and if the information was not reliable, he should have been told to consult another agency to determine the location of his property lines. Mr. Salazar indicated twenty (20) postholes have been dug and he has gone through two (2) augers due to soil conditions. Mr. Salazar stated that he feels the City has pushed him around and all he is trying to do is provide a safer area for his dogs to exercise and play and to make his neighbors feel more comfortable. Mayor Wilharber questioned whom Mr. Salazar spoke with at City Hall. Mr. Palzer indicated he Y q P n' had given Mr. Salazar the information. Mayor Wilharber questioned how far into the City's road right -of -way the fence was encroaching. Mr. Palzer stated eight inches. Mr. Hoeft stated that City officials can not be held accountable for information they give on the Y Yg location of property lines, it is ultimate responsibility of the property owner to determine exactly where the property lines are. Mayor Wilharber stated that the average property owner is not an attorney, engineer or surveyor and that if information was obtained from the City he understands why Mr. Salazar would believe Page 10 of 14 he could rely upon the information. Mayor Wilharber stated he felt the Salazars were attempting to improve the situation with their dogs. Mayor Wilharber also stated he would like to approve the variance to ensure that the fence is installed because he believes it would be for the greater good of the community. Mr. Salazar reiterated his willingness to sign a document accepting full, financial responsibility for any damages or removal of the fence due to it location in the City's road right -of -way. Mr. Salazar stated if the Stop Work Order had not been placed on the project he would have completed the installation of the fence by this time. Mayor Wilharber called for a vote on the motion. Ayes 2 (Travis, Nelson) Nays — 2 (Wilharber, Sweeney). Motion failed for lack of a majority. Motion by Mayor Wilharber, seconded by Council Member Sweeney to reconsider the previous motion to grant the variance to allow the fence to remain in the right -of -way. Ayes — 3 (Wilharber, Sweeney, Travis) Nays —1 (Nelson). Motion carried. Council Member Travis stated he concurred with Mayor Wilharber and that was reasoning behind modifying his vote, and believes strongly that the homeowner is responsible for location of their own property lines prior to beginning projects. 4. Resolution 00 -23, a Resolution approving an Abatement of Special Assessments (6973 Meadow Circle) Mayor Wilharber read information submitted by Teresa Bender bringing to the attention of the City special assessments for the Parkview Development that were not removed from PIN #R23- 31-22-31 -0064 (6973 Meadow Circle) on Anoka County Property and Taxation records following Burnett Title's payment in July of 1999 and continues to appear on the property owner's statement of property tax payable in 2000. Resolution 00 -23 would provide for an abatement of the special assessments and the appropriate paperwork needed to rectify the error with Anoka County. Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis to approve Resolution 00 -23, a Resolution approving an Abatement of Special Assessments at 6973 Meadow Circle. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Resolution 00 -24, a Resolution Authorizing City Participation in the "Minnesota Cities: Building Ouality Communities" Effort in Cooperation with the Fellow Members of the League of Minnesota Cities. Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis to approve Resolution 00 -24, a Resolution Authorizing City Participation in the "Minnesota Cities: Building Quality Communities" Effort in Cooperation with the Fellow Members of the League of Minnesota Cities. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Trail Paving at Acorn Creek Park Mr. March presented several quotes received for paving the trails in Acorn Creek Park. Two (2) firms submitted quotes, Arcade Asphalt and Northdale Construction. The quote from Arcade Page 11 of 14 4 Asphalt was $10,000 lower than that presented by Northdale Construction. Mr. March recommended accepting the presented bid from Arcade Asphalt. Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Nelson to accept the presented bid from Arcade Asphalt for the paving of the trails in Acorn Creek Park. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 7. Centerville Redi -Mix — Interim Use Permit (Renewal Request) Mr. March stated that Mr. Shudy, (Owner, Centerville Redi -Mix) has requested renewal of his Interim Use Permit. Mr. March stated that the Interim Use Permits needs to be reviewed on an annual basis for an extension not to exceed five years. Mr. March indicated that Mr. Shudy's current Interim Use Permit is scheduled to expire on October 14, 2000. Motion by Council Member Nelson, seconded by Council Member Sweeney to approve the extension of the Interim Use Permit for Centerville Redi -Mix. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 8. Ground Development Mr. March presented information to Council regarding Ground Development's proposed plan located south of the Center Oaks subdivisions. Mr. Cooper, representing Ground Development, presented a revised sketch of the proposed plan for the property reflecting the changes requested by the Planning and Zoning Committee. Discussion ensued regarding the development and Council's request that several items be revisited prior to resubmission. The following modifications were requested: location of trails; concern for the drainage ditch through the southern portion of the property; the need for the Parks and Recreation Committee to determine if a park is desired in the development or if other concession may be made, saving trees, modifications to the Comprehensive Plan for MUSA, sidewalk installation on Dupre Road, Anoka County's plans to widen Centerville Road, driveway concerns for the two (2) residences to the north, and a draft monument entrance sign plan for the development. Council Member Nelson left the meeting at 8:30 p.m. 9. Resolution 00 -25, a Resolution Approving a Public Hearing on the Tax Abatement for P g S Northern Forest Products Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis to approve Y pp rove Resolution 00 -25, a Resolution Approvin g Hearing a Public Hearin on the Tax Abatement for Northern Forest Products. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 10. The Widening of the Hunter's Crossing Development Trail Council Member Sweeney stated that due to minimal costs involved with widening the trail way, g , Y he was in favor of asking the developer to pay for same. Council Member Sweeney also stated that if the developer is not willing to pay the amount required, he would approve of the City paying for the widening. Page 12 of 14 L • Council Member Travis stated he would like the developer to pay for the widening of the trail and felt that connecting the trail with the Anoka County Park was a good idea. Mayor Wilharber directed Mr. March to contact the developer to discuss this issue. Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis to approve widenin of the trail in Hunter's Crossin • Develo i ment to a 4' /: foot bituminous trail. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. X. CONSENT AGENDA XI. COMMITTEE REPORTS Mayor Wilharber stated that there would be a Police Commission and Fire Steering meeting on October 12, 2000. XII. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Mr. March stated that the old, red, concession stand needed to be removed from the old Public Works site and placed at the new Public Works site. Mr. March stated that he had received a complaint in regards to the appearance of the old site and recommended that the City research the possibility of having the fire department use the building for fire practice. Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis to allow the old. concession stand building to be relocated to the new Public Works site. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Wilharber requested that Council approve signage for the new Public Works site and the Centennial Lakes Police substation. Signage will be similar in size, material, etc. to that of other signage on City property. Motion by Council Member Travis, seconded by Council Member Sweeney to authorize Mayor Wilharber to contract for signs for both the new Public Works site and the Centennial Lakes Police substation. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Wilharber stated he had spoken with Father Fitzgerald previously and Council had authorized Mr. March to draft a letter in regards to the likelihood of a land swap or purchase of land for the purpose of a Community Center. The Archdioceses has authorized the church to proceed if deemed appropriate. Mr. March suggested authorization by Council to obtain an appraisal of the church property and a duplex located on the same block. Council Member Sweeney stated that he would like to have the entire block appraised as he believes the City would need to purchase same in order to make the Community Center a reality. Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis to authorize Staff to obtain an appraisal for the block containing the church property and the duplex. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Page 13 of 14 Mr. March stated that the proposed, decorative lighting for the Hunter's Crossing Development would cost approximately $18,000 more than standard lighting. Council Member Sweeney questioned the amount of light radiated by decorative versus standard lighting and also questioned the amount of vertical light being emitted. Mr. March stated he was unsure of the specifications of either lighting options. Mayor Wilharber questioned whether or not there was lighting on City trails ways. Mr. Palzer stated there was not. Mr. March stated he had received a contract for lawn care services for the next year from Valley Creek Lawn and Landscaping. Mr. March stated that the hourly rate had not increased in three years and questioned Council as to their intentions in receiving additional bids prior to renewal of same. Mayor Wilharber stated that he preferred to receive an addition two (2) bids. A consensus was reached to direct Staff to solicit two (2) additional bids. XIII. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Council Member Sweeney, seconded by Council Member Travis to adjourn the October 11, 2000 City Council Meeting at 9:07 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed by: Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Page 14of14 CITY OF CENTERVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OCTOBER 3, 2000 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Comm' loll el i� : ' I t il eduled meeting on October 3, 2000, at 6:30 p. m. PRESENT: Commission Member Alan LaMotte j I Commission Member David ' r Commission Member Ro • S e ar• v • Commission Membe ohn cLe. .. - Commission M• -I bet R D x { n Commission e bei e I • • •1, Com • Sion e bei :: • r. • • =6 1 p, ) a ABSENT: : on COUNCI w oun Liars • i di Bro. s ar• is ce r �'t { � ,,` 3° x STAFF na l' dminis t r ar lb sU Pu�•li Work i e•tcr 'al�er � I a of r,- 4 I. / l LT • , k z . I et n �' , :s a i ed to br er . 2 p.m. 5 4 : IL .LC • 1 (S) r 4 if I .. asa — Variance Request r `'y h:" erson Hanson opened the public hearing at 6:33 p.m. Mr. and Mrs. Stan Hasiak, 6994 Centerville Road, appeared before the committee and requested a variance to enlarge the pole barn that currently exists on their property. Two percent (2 %) of the existing lot is 621 square feet. The existing shed greatly exceeds this amount. The existing building is 36' x 45'. Mr. Hasiak began constructing a "lean -to" addition to the north side of the pole barn of approximately 8' x 24'. Mr. Hasiak would like to use the addition for more storage. Paul Palzer, Building Official, issued a stop work order on the project and has also issued an order to remove the interior improvements to the pole barn without proper permits being issued. Commission Member McLean felt that he should remove himself from discussion in regards to this matter due to the fact he is a neighbor of the Hasiaks. Mrs. Hasiak stated several reasons for requesting a variance, they own eight (8) vehicles and would like to enclose them in an attempt to enhance the appearance of their yard and give her husband space to repair same. Mrs. Hasiak stated that they have little to no space available for storage and the existing crawl space underneath the residential building can not be utilized due to foundation erosion and Page 1 of 13 sewage /water backups. Mrs. Hasiak referred to a videotape in her possession that she wished to play for the committee and stated that Mr. March had previously viewed same. Mr. March told the Committee he had viewed the tape earlier in the day and noted that the condition of the home is a civil issue to be handled with the previous property owner. Council Liaison Broussard Vickers questioned Mrs. Hasiak as to why her situation was a special circumstance that would warrant the granting of a variance. Ms. Hasiak stated that the building is considered a non - conforming structure; however, they would like the opportunity to enjoy a garage and have storage similar to a basement. Mr. March stated he felt the criteria for granting a variance had been met in regards to the repairs on the interior of the building; however, exterior adjustments or improvements should not be included. Mr. March stated that other residents in the community have the opportunity to sheetrock, cement the floor and insulate their garage space if so desired. Mr. March stated that the Hasiak's non - conforming structure is much larger than most garages, which benefits the Hasiaks. Mr. March also noted that the Hasiak's property is large enough to be split, hence two assessments for service stubs on their property. Mr. March stated that the second special assessment placed on the Hasiak's property had been previously deferred by Council for 10 years excluding interest. Commission Member Brainard inquired if Mr. March believed the hardship requirement could be met. Mr. March indicated the basement is not suitable for storage. The Planning and Zoning Commission and the Council knew the building was there. The neighbors knew the building was there when they moved in. He explained he feels allowing the improvements to the interior provided proper permits are obtained would be agreeable to everyone. However, he expressed concern for allowing an enlargement to the building. Commission Member McLean commented in the capacity of a neighbor rather than a Commission Member. Mr. McLean indicated he did not have concems with the interior improvements to the building; however, he was concerned with the exterior improvements. Mr. McLean indicated that the Hasiaks would benefit differently than any other resident of the community due to the fact that their accessory structure currently is larger than allowable and others are exempt to building accessory structures of similar size. Mrs. Hasiak stated that their priority is to be allowed to complete the interior improvements. Commission Member LaMotte questioned the location of the accessory structure versus the property line. Mrs. Hasiak stated that the structure is approximately fourteen (14) feet from the property line. Commission Member LaMotte stated that storage of automobiles is the responsibility of the owner not the City. Mrs. Hasiak indicated she has three (3) antique cars and would like to store them inside the structure. Commission Member LaMotte questioned the Hasiaks whether they were capable of adding an attached garage to the house. Mrs. Hasiak stated that the lot size did not allow for an attached garage. Motion by Commission Member DeVine, seconded by Commission Member LaMotte, to continue the public hearing to the October 11, 2000, City Council Meeting at 6:00 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Chairperson Hanson closed the public hearing at 7:00 p.m. Page 2of13 2. Salazar Fence Chairperson Hanson opened the public hearing at 7:00 p.m. Mr. and Mrs. Pedro Salazar appeared before the committee and requested a variance to be allowed to construct a six (6) foot wooden privacy fence in their rear yard. The property is a corner lot located at 7336 Old Mill Road. According to Ordinance #4, the Salazars have two (2) front yards. The Salazars would like a variance to leave the north side of the fence facing Old Mill Road located where they have already dug the fence post - holes. These holes are approximately one (1) foot into the road right -of -way. Construction was begun without a variance and a Stop Work Order was issued on the project. Mr. Salazar stated that he had contacted Paul Palzer, Building Official and questioned the positioning of the fence and was told twelve (12) to fourteen (14) feet from the curb. He then split the difference and installed the fence post -holes 13 feet from the curb. He stated the project was a three -step process involving grading the lot, sprinkler system and the fence. He has the corner holes in and if he were required to move them they would interfere with where the sprinkler system has been installed. Commission Member LaMotte questioned the distance from the fence to the sidewalk. Mr. Salazar stated approximately one (1) foot. Commission Member Brainard questioned if Mr. Salazar was told he would not need a permit. Mr. Salazar stated he was told if the fence was kept under six (6) feet he would not need a permit. Commission Member Kilian questioned the distance between the curb and the fence. Mr. Salazar stated approximately thirteen (13) feet. Mr. Salazar explained that he has waited over a month to continue work on the fence and would like to complete the project prior to the ground freezing. Commission Member McLean questioned if the six (6) foot fence would cause visual obstruction. Mr. March stated that the fence would not extend beyond the corner of the garage so visibility is not an issue. Commission Member DeVine questioned Mr. Paul Palzcr whether he remembered speaking to Mr. Salazar. Mr. Palzer stated he did recall speaking to Mr. Salazar; however, the project was started three months prior to the conversation. Mr. Palzer indicated he had stated, "twelve (12) to fourteen (14) feet is typical ". However, in this case the City right -of -way ends at thirteen (13) feet, eight (8) inches due to the fact the street is not centered. Mr. Palzer stated his opposition to leaving the fence in the City right - of -way. Commission Member Brainerd questioned Mr. Palzer as to what his opposition was. Mr. Palzer stated that there could be problems with snow plowing or if in the future the City needed to enter the right -of- way. If entering the right -of -way necessitates the removal of any or part of the fence it would be done at the property owners expense. Commission Member Brainard questioned whether Council had informed Mr. Salazar he needed a six (6) foot fence. Mr. Salazar stated he wished to go beyond City requirement to ensure the safety and comfort of the neighbors and to provide a proper exercise area for the dogs. Mr. Salazar stated he felt it Page 3 of 13 was the responsibility of the City to tell him he was placing the fence in the wrong place prior to him getting this far along in the process because the City knew he was building the fence. Chairperson Hanson questioned as to how he arrived at starting the fence at thirteen (13) feet from the curb. Mr. Salazar indicated he used thirteen (13) feet because it is between twelve (12) and fourteen (14) feet. Commission Member DeVine spoke as a neighbor of the Salazars and indicated he is in favor of the fence. Mr. DeVine stated he had spoken to another neighbor who voiced her support of the fence. Mr. DeVine also stated he does not believe one (1) foot either way will make very much difference. Commission Member Kilian agreed one (1) foot is not a big difference. Mr. Kilian stated he would like it to be made clear, however, if the fence stays in the City right -of -way and the City needs to remove it for any reason it would be the responsibility of the Salazars to repair and replace it at their expense. Mr. Salazar expressed his willingness to agree to repair and replace the fence, at his cost, should the need arise if the City needs access to the right -of -way or if the fence is hit by the snowplow. Commission Member Brainard noted it is not the responsibility of the City to survey a property or determine for the property owner where the lot lines exist. He indicated the City can give guidance, but it is ultimately the responsibility of the property owner. Mr. Salazar said he believed he should be able to rely upon information received from the City. Commission Member DeVine stated he does not think it is right to call City Hall and get information as to where the fence should be placed and then have the City place a stop order on work because the information given out was incorrect and the fence is now in the City right -of -way. Mr. Palzer noted there was a three month time period between the telephone call and the start of the project. Mr. Salazar indicated he was waiting for an available contractor to begin the project. Mr. March explained to the Commission he had sent out a certified letter as follow -up to Mr. Salazar's appearance before the Council on the dog issue. In that letter it informed the Salazars that a variance may be required to build a fence. The certified letter was refused by the Salazars and returned by the post office as undeliverable. The letter was then delivered by the Centennial Lakes Police Department. At that time period, construction of the fence had already begun. Mr. March indicated that the City had tried to preempt the current situation by sending the letter and that by not accepting the letter; the Salazars have created the current situation. Mr. March stated he believed the fence would be an amenity to the property and would not detract from it. Mr. March stated that the current Ordinance #4 needs to more clearly define front yards pertaining to corner lots. Mr. March also stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission would be discussing this issue in the near future and at present the concern is the placement of the fence in the right -of -way. Motion by Commission Member DeVine, seconded by Commission Member Brainard to continue the public hearing to the October 11, 2000 City Council Meeting at 6:00 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Salazar presented to Mr. March letters of support for the fence from two (2) of his neighbors. Chairperson Hanson closed the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. 3. County Bank Page 4 of 13 Chairperson Hanson opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m, County Bank is requesting a variance for their proposed sign to be located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Main Street and 21 Avenue. Craig Bode, Branch Manager, and Dave Shannon of Color Sign were in attendance. The variance request is for a larger and taller sign than Ordinance #4 permits. A new schematic for the sign was presented and the revised schematic showed a two (2) foot taller sign than originally proposed, along with an instant cash sign below the main sign. The proposed sign would be approximately 26.58 feet tall and 211 square feet in size. Ordinance #4 requires a maximum height of twenty (20) feet and eighty (80) square feet in size for a free standing sign in a commercial district. The variance request includes a time and temperature reader board, which is currently not allowed by Ordinance #4. Commission Member DeVine indicated there are proposed amendments to Ordinance #4 allowing message reader signs and to increase the size of the signs based on the frontage of the property in order for Centerville to compete with Lino Lakes. Mr. March questioned if there was a way the bank could provide a frame of reference as to how the sign would look with the building. Mr. Shannon indicated the Amoco sign was approximately two hundred fifty (250) square feet and thirty -five (35) feet high. County Bank is proposing a sign that would be nine (9) feet shorter and fifty (50) square feet smaller. Mr. Shannon stated that it would be very difficult to incorporate the copy and logo on a smaller sign. Commission Member Kilian stated that based on the location of the sign to the building, he believed it would look proportionate. Commission Member LaMotte inquired as to why the bank is applying for a variance at this point when Ordinance #4 is to be revised. Mr. Shannon indicated the need to place the footings in the ground prior to the ground freezing. Mr. Shannon stated that the permanent bank building would be open February 1, 2001 and that they desired to have the sign up by then. Commission Member Brainard questioned whether Ordinance #4 could be modified rather than granting a variance. Mr. March stated that County Bank did not want to apply for a variance after the ordinance was revised if their sign ended up being larger than the requirements subsequent to amendments. Mr. March stated that the sign ordinance is rather lengthy and would require ample consideration from the Commission. Mr. March also stated that the sign proposed by County Bank is similar in size to signs that are located in other communities such as Center City and Forest Lake. Commission Member Kilian stated his unwillingness to allow a reader board sign similar to that of a car dealership located in Forest Lake due to the fact that it distracts peoples driving attention and is unsightly. Mr. Shannon stated that the sign the bank is proposing is much smaller than the one in Forest Lake and could be programmed to allow the printing to be stable. Mr. Shannon felt that the sign could be an asset to the community by announcing community events. Commission Member Brainard questioned the materials that would be used for the temporary sign and if footings would be needed to support same. Mr. Shannon indicated footings were not needed for a temporary sign; however, the bank would like to place the footings for the permanent sign prior to the ground freezing and have the sign in place prior to the anticipated February 2001 opening, Page 5 of 13 Commission Member Brainard expressed a desire to amend Ordinance #4 rather than granting a variance. Commission Member Kilian questioned why the footings and steel posts could not be placed this fall prior to the ground freezing and modifying at a future date subsequent to the amended Ordinance. Mr. Shannon stated he has not built signs that way but indicated it was possible. Mr. March stated he concurred with Commission Member Brainard and stated that if the sign ordinance is not amended that the bank should apply for a Special Use Permit rather than a variance. Commission Member LaMotte expressed his desire to revise the sign ordinance rather than granting a variance. Council Liaison Broussard Vickers stated that she would prefer revisiting the sign portion of Ordinance #4 rather than granting the variance. Motion by Commission Member DeVine, seconded by Commission Member Sheppard to continue the public hearing to the October 11, 2000 City Council Meeting at 6:00 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Chairperson Hanson closed the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. III. APPEARANCES 1. Mr. Roger Shimon — Zoning/Electrical Fencing Mr. March indicated Mr. Shimon was unable to attend the meeting and had requested that the Commission table the matter to the November 14, 2000 meeting. Motion by Commission Member Brainard, seconded by Commission Member McLean to table Mr. Shimon's appearance before the Planning and Zoning Commission to the November 14, 2000 Plannin' and Zonin• Commission Meetin' at 6:30 .m. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Ground Development Mr. Terry Hannah, Ground Development, appeared before the Commission to present a proposed development plan for the former Gor -em Property. The property is located south of the Center Oaks Development. Mr. March noted some initial concerns based on the plans presented. Those include double frontage lots, access to the two (2) homes that are already located off of Short Street, rear yards that have useable property on the other side of wetlands, proposed trail location and dead -end roads not ending in temporary cul -de -sacs. Mr. Sterm, Ground Development's engineer, addressed the concerns of Mr. March by indicating their willingness to work within City requirements. Mr. Sterm stated that there are several ways to modify and improve the plan and they are open to suggestions. Page 6of13 Mr. March questioned whether Ground Development had considered other plans prior to presenting the plans to the City. Mr. Sterm stated that they usually have one (1) plan they feel strongly about and not several plans. Commission Member Kilian questioned whether the residents to the north had been consulted as to whether they wanted a trail running behind their property. Mr. Sterm said that they had not contacted these residents, however, they would be willing to do so. Chairperson Hanson questioned whether the developer anticipated a traffic problem on Centerville Road being the only access to the development. Mr. Sterm indicated a traffic study has not been completed, but one could be done, Mr. Sterm also indicated he will be working with Anoka County with regards to Centerville Road being the only access and additional road requirements needed. Commission Member LaMotte questioned whether the development was contained in the MUSA. Mr. Hannah indicated two thirds (2/3) of the development is contained in MUSA for 2001 and the final one third (1/3) is contained in MUSA for 2005. Mr. LaMotte also questioned if the development would be built in phases based on the MUSA line. Mr. Hannah stated it would be built in phases beginning with those lots closest to Centerville Road. Commission Member LaMotte questioned how Ground Development intended to handle the development where the drainage ditches are concerned. Mr. Hannah indicated they were just made aware of the ditches and would work with the City Engineer to comply with requirements and recommendations of the City. Mr. March stated that it would be the City's preference for temporary cul -de -sacs rather than pads for turn- arounds based on the fact the turn- arounds in the past have been used for extra storage of boats and vehicles rather than turn- arounds. Council Liaison Broussard Vickers stated, as a property owner to the south of the proposed development, she would prefer to have the cul -de -sac so that it would look like the road had ended. She noted if the street appears to go through; off road vehicles, including snowmobiles, will go straight through onto her property and she would prefer not to have that type of problem. Commission Member DeVine questioned whether the City would require a park in the development. Mr. March indicated the Parks and Recreation Commission had not meet on the issue but he thought they would prefer a park dedication fee. Commission Member LaMotte questioned the type of homes Ground Development anticipates building in the development. Mr. Hannah stated they would use a diverse group of builders so there would be a diverse type of homes. Mr. Hannah stated that it is their preference to have as many ramblers and walkout ramblers as possible rather than split entry homes. He believes having ramblers rather than split entry homes will enhance the value and appearance of the property. Mr. Hannah provided a copy of the covenants and restrictions required in Ground Development's development in the City of Independence. Mr. March questioned how the developer intended to enforce the outside storage covenants and restrictions. Mr. Hannah stated that the covenants are given to builders who in turn give them to the property owners. Mr. Hannah stated he works in conjunction with the builder, the City and the property owner to make sure outside storage complies with the developer's covenants and City ordinance. Page 7 of 13 Mr. March questioned if Ground Development was open to the City requiring a minimum size for garages within the development. Mr. Hannah stated that Ground Development was open to all suggestions from the City. Commission Member DeVine stated an interest in reviewing the elevations for the lots to determine what type of buildings the lots would accommodate. Mr. March stated the City is looking for higher valued homes to balance out the housing stock in the community, as there are currently a high number of entry-level homes. Mr. Hannah agreed and stated it is the preference of Ground Development to build as many full basement homes as possible to increase home values. Commission Member Brainard state he would like to see the development come to Centerville. Mr. March stated he preferred Ground Development's design concept to the design previously submitted by Gor -Em. Commission Member DeVine questioned whether Mr. Palzer had any questions or concerns. Mr. Palzer stated that he had concerns regarding the cul -de -sac to the northwest of the development not meeting the lots to the north. Mr. Palzer also stated that the same lots may be large enough to be divided in the future and there is a potential that they may be assessed double sewer and water assessments. Mr. Sterm noted he would check to see if they were large enough to be subdivided. Mr. March expressed a concern for Lots 1 through 7 of Block 3 due to the fact that Dupre Road runs behind the lots and there would be no privacy in the back of those lots. Mr. Sterm stated that something different could be done if it is the desire of the City with those lots such as leaving it a natural wetland. IV. OLD BUSINESS 1. Hasaik Variance Request Commission Member DeVine questioned if the Hasaiks would need a variance to do the interior work if the building were not non - conforming. Mr. March said there would not be a requirement for a variance, but a building permit would still need to be obtained. Commission Member DeVine stated he would recommend partially approving the variance to allow for the interior modifications provided the proper permits and inspections were obtained. Council Liaison Broussard Vickers questioned Mr. Palzer whether sheet rocking the interior of the pole barn would fall under the definition of "expanding the use" of the building. Mr. Palzer stated it was his interpretation that sheet rocking the interior of the building intensified the use of a pole building and that is the reason a stop order was placed on the improvements. Commission Member Kilian questioned whether all the interior improvements would need to be removed for the inspection. Mr. Palzer stated he would visually inspect the improvements prior to the official building inspection to ascertain which items needed to be removed prior to the official inspection. Page 8of13 Chairperson Hanson questioned the status of the interior work. Mrs. Hasiak stated that the sheet rock rP q and insulation has been installed, but the finishing drywall has not been applied. Mr. March stated that he feels the interior finish work meets the criteria required for a variance but that enlarging the building does not. Chairperson Hanson stated his opposition to granting a variance for expanding the building due to setting a precedent for others to request variances for larger accessory buildings than allowed by ordinance. Dave Radeck, 6960 Meadow Circle, appeared before the Commission and stated that he drives past the property every day on the way to and from work and the pole building is an eyesore. Mrs. Hasiak stated the pole barn is in better shape than the house is due to the crawlspace's foundation collapsing. Chairperson Hanson made a point of order comment indicating issues relating to the civil dispute between Mrs. Hasiak and the former property owner should be kept out of the discussion regarding the variance request. Mrs. Hasiak stated the house would not have been sold without the pole barn being there is no garage. Mr. Palzer indicated the Hasiaks have the right to add an attached garage to the house. Council Liasion Broussard Vickers questioned how long the building would be allowed to remain on the property as a non - conforming structure. Mr. Palzer indicated under the old Ordinance #4 it was thirty (30) years and under the new ordinance there is no timeframe. Motion by Commission Member DeVine, seconded by Commission Member Sheppard to recommend to Council approval of the variance to allow for the interior changes provided the proper building permits and inspections are obtained and to deny the variance request for expansion of the non - conforming structure. Ayes — 5 Nays — 1 (Brainard) Abstain — 1 (McLean). Motion carried. 2. County Bank Variance Request Chairperson Hanson stated he would prefer not to grant the variance and that the sign ordinance needs to be reviewed and amended. Council Liasion Broussard Vickers stated she would prefer to revisit the sign ordinance in depth rather than grant the variance. She also indicated she believed it was the general consensus of the Council that County Bank's sign would fit within the parameters discussed, however, no final agreement on changes to the sign ordinance were made. Therefore, there is no guarantee the sign proposed by County Bank would conform to ordinance requirements. Commission Member DeVine stated he would like to amend the sign ordinance to designate a special district east of 20` Avenue on either side of Main Street to allow for signs such as the one proposed by County Bank. Page 9 of 13 Commission Member Kilian stated it was his preference that County Bank put in the footings and leave the pipes long enough for a larger sign should the sign be approved and if the sign is not approved the pipes may be cut to the proper length for a sign to conform to City ordinance. Motion by Commission Member Brainard, seconded by Commission Member Kilian to recommend to Council denial of County Bank's request for a sign variance. Ayes — 4 Nays — 3 (DeVine, Sheppard, McLean). Motion carried. 3. Salazar Variance Request Commission Member Kilian questioned whether Mr. Palzer had told Mr. Salazar the property line began twelve (12) to fourteen (14) feet from the curb. Mr. Palzer indicated he had told him his property line began twelve (12) to fourteen (14) feet from the curb as that is an approximate r g ( ) ( } for a normal setback. He also indicated it is the responsibility of the homeowner to locate the property line and that the information received from the City should only be a guideline ry y b gu del ne to assist him in determining the location of the property line. Council Liaison Broussard Vickers noted it is the responsibility of the property owner not the City to determine where the property line is before commencing work. She stated she does not support leaving g the fence in the right-of-way as the City did take steps via a certified letter to inform the Salazars a variance may be required. Commission Member Kilian stated his approval for the variance to allow a six (6) foot fence provided it did not go beyond the back corner of the garage and is not in the City's right -of -way. Commission Member McLean questioned Mr. Palzer's preference on the matter. Mr. Palzer stated it is his preference to keep the fence out of the right -of -way to avoid problems in the future. Commission Member DeVine questioned whether Mr. Salazar would be required to move the sprinkler system if the City requests he move the fence out of the right -of -way. It was the consensus of the Commission that any costs associated with the relocation of fence outside of the right -of -way was the Salazar's responsibility. Mr. March state that Mr. Salazar had indicated if the City does not grant the variance he will not put the fence up "because the City won't let him." Mr. Palzer stated that previously other residents have requested variances for the exact same thing and II I were denied, as the old ordinance was in effect then which defined corner lots to have two front yards. ya ds. Mr. March questioned whether the intent of the Planning and Zoning Commission was to modify the ordinance to indicate corner lots did not have two (2) front yards. If so, the six (6) foot fence would be allowed because it would be in the side yard. Council Liasion Broussard Vickers indicated she believed it was the intent of Council to modify the ordinance as it relates to corner lots and indicate that a corner lot would only have one (1) front yard. Motion by Commission Member Kilian, seconded by Commission Member McLean to recommend to Council to grant the variance for the 6 -foot fence p rovided the fence is on or inside Page 10 of 13 the property line. Ayes — 3 Nays — 3 (DeVine, Sheppard, LaMotte) Abstain — 1 (Brainard). Motion failed. Council Liaison Broussard Vickers stated she was unsure the variance request met the requirements, as she does not believe the situation is unique and believes the situation was created by their own actions. Ms. Vickers also stated that a minor revision to the ordinance to change the language to define corner lots as not having two front yards would solve the problem. Chairperson Hanson called a five - minute recess at 9:30 p.m. Chairperson Hanson called the meeting back to order at 9:35 p.m. 4. Ordinance #4 — Building Official's Recommendation for Modification Mr. Palzer raised an issue in regards to the newly adopted Ordinance #4. A resident recently questioned how small of a garage could be built in Royal Meadows. Upon reviewing the new ordinance, Mr. Palzer discovered garages that are attached to the dwelling unit have no minimum size and those detached from the dwelling unit are limited by the "2% of yard" rule. By definition, an accessory structure is allowed only to be detached as noted on page 2. On page 19, an accessory building cannot be attached, so the entire first sentence of the second paragraph should be deleted. Also the second sentence requires deletion of "unless attached to and made a part of the main building: and the five (5) foot requirement should be changed to six (6) feet to be consistent with the building code. Detached accessory structures used, as a garage should be allowed to be larger than 2% of the yard area in the M -1 and R -4 zones due to the very narrow and small lot sizes in these districts. Most of the homes in these districts occupy most of the width of the lot. The "District Regulations" should be modified with the addition of a minimum garage size. The existing regulations require four hundred forty (440) square feet in the R -2 and R -2A zones and six hundred (600) square feet in the R -5 zone. Mr. Palzer recommended a minimum of two hundred twenty (220) square feet in the R -4 and M -1 zones. The Commission may choose to add a maximum size for an attached garage. Currently, the building code allows up to three thousand (3,000) square feet as a maximum, which is extremely large in most of the residential districts in Centerville. Mr. March stated he would like the City to require a minimum of six hundred (600) square feet of garage space for all new construction in R2, R -2A and R -5. Mrs. Richard Haug, 1965 South Robin Lane, stated she was the homeowner Mr. Palzer was referring to and that she currently has no garage. Mrs. Haug stated she would like to build a garage, as it is her desire to store some of her lawn and garden equipment, as well as to have a place to park some of her vehicles. Mr. Palzer indicated it may be possible for the property owner to attach the garage to the house with a breezeway and then there would be no maximum square footage limitation. Mr. March inquired as to the size of garage the property owner would like to construct. Mr. Palzer stated it was approximately twenty -four (24) by twenty (26) feet or the equivalent of a two and a half car garage. Page 11 of 13 Council Liaison Broussard Vickers noted the ordinance needs to be revised defining minimums and maximums for attached and detached garages. Mr. Palzer stated it would be his preference to have the garage attached to the house rather than detached because in his opinion the garage would be better maintained if it were part of the house. Mrs. Haug inquired as to the height limitation for the structure. Mr. Palzer stated the maximum height is fourteen (14) feet. Council Liasion Broussard Vickers suggested Staff draft some suggested wording changes to Ordinance #4 and present them for a public hearing at the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Motion by Commission Member DeVine, seconded by Commission Member Brainard to table discussion on Ordinance #4 to the November 14, 2000 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting at 6:30 p.m. to allow Staff to draft a revision to the ordinance. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Sample Sign Ordinances Chairperson Hanson recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission schedule workshop dates to discuss proposed modifications to the sign section of Ordinance #4. A consensus was that the Planning and Zoning Commission schedule workshops to discuss the proposed modifications to the sign section of Ordinance #4 on October 17, October 24, November 21, and November 28, 2000 at 6:30 p.m. at the Public Works Building. Motion by Commission Member DeVine to recommend to Council to amend the sign section of Ordinance #4 to establish a special district from 20 Avenue east to the City limits on both sides of the street to allow for signs two hundred (200) square feet and forty (40) feet high. The motion died for lack of a second. Motion by Commission Member Brainard, seconded by Commission Member DeVine to schedule workshop dates to discuss proposed modifications to the sign section of Ordinance #4 on October 17, October 24, November 21, and November 28, 2000 at 6:30 p.m. at the Public Works Building. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. V. NEW BUSINESS 1. 2001 Budget Mr, March discussed with the Commission the 2000 budget with funds being $1,540 and questioned whether or not the consensus of the Planning and Zoning Commission was to retain the same level for 2001. It was the consensus of the Planning and Zoning Commission for the budget to remain at $1,540 for 2001. 2. Reschedule November Meeting Due to Elections Page 12 of 13 • J It was the consensus of the Planning and Zoning Commission to reschedule the November meeting to November 14, 2000 due to the elections. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS There were no discussion items. VII. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES 1. July 19, 2000 Joint Workshop Meeting Minutes Motion by Commission Member DeVine, seconded by Chairperson Hanson to approve the July 19, 2000 Joint Workshop Meeting Minutes. All in favor. Abstain — 4 (Hanson, Kilian, Sheppard, McLean). Motion carried. 2. August 1, 2000 Meeting Minutes Motion by Commission Member Kilian, seconded by Commission Member DeVine to approve the August 1, 2000 Meeting Minutes. All in favor. Abstain —1 (Sheppard). Motion carried. Council Liaison Broussard Vickers noted she was in attendance at the August 1, 2000 meeting and requested that it be included in the minutes. 3. September 5, 2000 Meeting Minutes Commission Member McLean requested the minutes be changed to reflect his attendance at the September 5, 2000 meeting. Motion by Commission Member McLean, seconded by Commission Member Devine to approve the September 5, 2000 meeting minutes with the requested change. All in favor. Abstain — 4 (LaMotte, Kilian, Hanson, Brainard). VII. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commission Member DeVine, seconded by Commission Member Sheppard to adjourn the October 3, 2000 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting at 10:00 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed by: Joan Lenzmeier, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Page 13 of 13 op A i NO , CENTERVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 17, 2000 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Centerville Economic Development Committee held their regularly scheduled meeting on October 17, 2000 at City Hall, 1880 Main Street. Present: Chairperson Tim Rehbine Committee Member Lori Dorn Committee Member Paul Montain Committee Member Michelle Moser Committee Member Betsy Scheller Absent: Couu,dttee Member John Magill Committee Member Mary Capra Committee Member Dick Travis (Council liaison) Staff: Kris Sweeney CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Tim Rehbine called the meeting to order at approximately 7:10 p.m APPROVAL OF MINUTES October 17, 2000, Economic Development Committee Meeting Minutes Motion by Ms. Moser, seconded by Ms. Dorn to approve the October 17, 2000 Economic Development Committee Meeting Minutes. All in favor. Mr. Montain abstained. Motion carried. APPEARANCES Mayor Wilharber appeared at approximately 8:20 p.m. He commented on the next phase of Center Oaks and how more expensive the homes will be. This will also help in creating new businesses in town. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Design Team — "Ideas in Action" Historical Markers — No report was given. • Downtown Revitalization NOT Mr. Rehbine mentioned that he hadn't heard anything new on the downtown revitalization grants. Ms. Scheller stated that this grant was put into the planning stages not the development stages. Ms. Dorn mentioned that we did receive a $500.00 grant from State Farm Insurance as originally thought. They only issue them twice a year. Ms. Dorn explained she had spoke with Mr. March regarding the grant. Mr. Montain remarked on the LaMotte Building and how nice it was. He also commented on the downtown area and how it has improved in the past 10 years. Ms. Dorn asked Mr. Montain about his building. He mentioned that he is going to do some improvement, but currently he had to put in a new heating and cooling system. He is planning on installing new awnings, a clock, and new driveway. Ms. Scheller stated that she visited R & K Cafe and Catering. They have repainted it inside; and that the french toast was excellent! She did mention that she talked to Kathy, on of the owners, and Kathy stated they were looking into remodeling the Cafe into an arcade. They would sell hamburgers and fries and make it more teen oriented. Mr. Montain answered Ms. Moser's questions regarding the Dairy Queen. Apparently Gerald Rehbine is having trouble with the City of Lino Lakes and the flood plain issue. They are still interested. There was discussion about the proposed grocery store /strip mall going in behind the new County Bank. It was thought that it is still in the demographic study stage. Ms. Capra submitted a memo regarding the grand opening of the LaMotte Building to providing refreshments. The committee thought is was a good idea, but there were concerns with some of the members about playing favoritism. They agreed to the exception of $80.00 to $100.00 for the LaMotte Building due to the fact that there will be four businesses located there. In all other cases the cost should be between $20.00 to $30.00 per business. A motion was made to have the refreshments catered by R & K Cafe and Catering for the grand opening of the LaMotte Building. Motion by Mr. Montain, seconded by Ms. Scheller. Motion carried unanimously. The committee discussed setting a standard on giving out welcome packets, cards, gifts and staying within a certain dollar value of approximately $20 to $30. A motion was made by Ms. Scheller to set a standard monetary value on the welcome pacts, cards, and gifts for new business. Mr. Montain seconded. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. I�_ Star City Goals Appkov Ms. Scheller contacted the Wargo Nature Center and was told someone would get back to her and they did not. She was she will be calling them regarding winter activities. The committee discussed several different possibilities (example: snow sculptures and light contest). Mr. Montain suggested that this would be more in the line of the Fete de Lacs Committee or the Park and Recreation Committee than business related. The committee decided that they were not going to do any winter activities for this year. They would start planning for next year. Ms. Scheller stated that Ms. Capra suggested that EDC have a winter Business Appreciation night with hot chocolate and treats, because there are businesses that we missed in the spring. Mr. Montain stated that the EDC goal was to maintain our current businesses and reach out to the new businesses in town. Welcome Neighbor Packets Ms. Scheller asked if anyone brought a welcome packet over to Embers. It was mentioned that Ms. Capra picked up mugs, but it was unknown whether they were delivered to the new businesses. Mr. Rehbine suggested that they touch base with Ms. Capra. City Merchandise Mr. Rehbine was interested in the amount of inventory that was left and if they needed to order any more. NEW BUSINESS Mr. Rehbine suggested that the EDC invite new or current business owners once a month to an EDC meeting to discuss their needs, or offer their suggestions. It was agreed that they would allow approximately 15 minutes for the business owner to speak at the beginning of the meeting. It was also agreed that each committee member would rotate inviting new or current businesses. Ms. Dorn offered to set up a business for November. Mr. Rehbine mentioned that this week was Minnesota Manufacturer's Week and that a certificate was being set out to the manufacturers in Centerville. Governor Jesse Ventura signed this Certificate. A short letter was sent with the Certificates and the Proclamation that was signed by the Governor. Lino Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce was mentioned. Ms. Capra had questions but was not able to attend this meeting. Mr. Rehbine stated that he received a call regarding the Lino Lakes Area Chamber and wanted more information on the Chamber. He also stated that EDC and the Chamber are similar groups and that is why the City of Centerville joined. The 2001 Budget was discussed. The committee needed more information NOT ApptAlgosb for the November meeting. Other New Business: Mr. Montain questioned when the Citizen and Business Persons of the Year Certificates were given out. This year, they were handed out at the Fete de Lacs. The committee was unsure of the policy in the past, and requested more information at the next meeting so they can recommend when they would like to see the awards presented. The committee questioned when the to vote for chairperson would take place and also requested copies of the by -laws in the next packet. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Ms. Dorn, seconded by Mr. Montain to adjourn the October 17, 2000, EDC Meeting. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at approximately 8:45 p.m. Respectfit ly submitted: Kris Sweeney City Staff li a, .., i E PHEASANT MARSH i CENT ILLE °` - CENTERVILLE, MINNESOTA INDEX = D 55038 PRELIMINARY PLAT EXHIBITS N -ry ii J¢ - E� I SH EET 1 TITLE SHEET W FE . ,� FOR SHEET 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT CC _ Q �� € 14 T SHEET 3 - EXISTING CONDITIONS z 3 11 GROUND DEVELOPMENT INC. SHEET 4 PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN CO W 0 ` � '. c..' SHEET 5 - PRE HUG PLAN E w t r gl 6/rk[ Huc' 7 575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD, SUITE 250, GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 SHEET 6 STREET PROFILES z °= 55038 . I y PHONE (763) 546 -2625 FAX: (763) 546 -7321 SH EET 7 - STREET PROFILES '3 CL o b A --new, 1 e • E ms .„, y SHEET B - STREET PROFILES a - uu _ 4Th 1- L j ii 1 I , I T_,. - CEN1r,v OAKS "I "ENTER 2 €�"_ II / { � I I I _ . I I -se = I 000 J I 1 ` 8 2 I 5 I !lilt! OUTLOT B 1 1 , -- `, 5._ II - . —= •� ..- o r..,_�� - - - I V r 1 I rll �i I 8 7 6 5 4 3 I 2 ∎ 1 1 1 1 \ 1 ,r 3 _. 2 1 1 I 1 1 L l i 2 \ `} i 1 _ _ A L J J L r r 2 1 v v _— 4— c L J ni Tr —__ -,. rlv�. iL i._: _� � > � . � . J L --� ■ - -- --� J a 3 „ I. Ton rIi! . . , l4 / / / l — - ; � _ -S-li 5 ii--- 4 jr - - I 2 - - ± 1 r r - -- rb� 1 - - I r � V n II �/- r II u T II y . `9 q ^! t1 { + I i � i . i l l 9 v ��� v , 7 �w� l i ii ii i I 4 it 5 // I OUTLOT A �`' o Ci c'J 9 � . ,/ r II \ \ \, II JL__ JL__ � -- I rr 0 6 . �-+ 9 w C °. 5? // n 1v v v vv Jv -- - --1r r I/ �y 1 // r / I I II \ L JL-1 - r II I I r J f lyi O ° 1 n , 5 , a • 1 // 1I 11 L II II / J - n I - f 21 \\ 7r J '8 9 110 it 1 13 �� c4gN wo c,l I 4 20 i 19 10 pi 7 Q W q JL ) :1 � ' -- -_��._ - -- \. _ ` .. "1 < r 11 \ 1 n L L ` I i lI i i i r � Th . _ _ w ° E" q L n 11 )„>N4' __JL JL _ �. >` I l 1 1 11 L i 18 �'�l' \\ —_. — - � / / /11 i 9 11 $ n O 5 _ 11 _ I n a ° �I i \\‘` , 26 I, ,, I , --- I _ \\ i � . • � r ' ,, \ \ � \ J Chi \�\ ii 25.;! I 22 ■ I \ .\) n 241E 12 �. / - -- I 27 \\,\ ' i1 . 23 I / // ,Il _ / I 16 I / /': i t r 8 , % ^- 7,- ---- 11 -, — -_51 15 , / / '5`c 2 DRAWN BY r - - -1 I I -/ a ./. 1 N , / \ 1, �. �� RSS I ' %x 29 11 30 i+ 31 32 1 33 ---/1/ 13 / / .. j Z DATE ` ;; I II I I i L ^ \\ ' s , 3 // / / 10/26/00 11 n ... r � 14 \\ �, / � � , // 4 // P REPARED BY JAMES R. HILT„ INC r ' —,I� " " 1 \ \ \ \\ Y N. \ / / (/ 6 REVISIONS il ,` n UL �� -'\ , \ \,��__� // JOE G . COOPER RF.G NO 1849 t. Al( L iL - -1r 1\ \, \ �` \ V v �// 5 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CI VIL ENGINEER r rc �r 34 \ ^; s y \.. II% 35 \ \ J • < � ; � T O i ERS9. T. G. r .I4 40 39 n 38 I 37 36 \, ,, __--`" - ^p 9 ,) r - - REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR o \ \ \ \ \ \ // $ l \\ $CAI£ IN FEET L_ � � -4 / 12 \ \ 1 \ \ \‘ O rl 7 \\ 0 lao 70 zoo 300 BE$ / 1\ ■■ \v // rl \\ INN ON CORNER OF DUPRE ROAD ROAD & k VOYAGER COURT 915.50 CAD PILE _r \\ \\ / rr V 1 inrf - 100 feet TNN ON CORNER OF PIONEER LANE & EAGLE TRAIL 911. 20237T5 -U — lm fir___ J� _ „ \\ /, /� rr V \\ NH ON CORNER OF DUPRE ROAD & PIONEER LANE 911.66 ,\ \ I/ \\ PROJECT NO. 3L_ -_ -J,_ J - NN - _A 20237 _______— _______________________ SHEET 1 OF 8 • 0 cN -4-0,c)-,- N b. DRAINAGE AND V THUG. EEASEMENT., - _ PROPOSED SITE DATA ARE SH OfiN MuS �•�••. N PROPERTY DESCRIPTIGN EXISD TIO NG CONDEMNS MINIMUM SETBACKS i \ m =CC DOSING ZONING R -5 (SINGLE FAMILY PROPOSED ZONING PLAN DEVELOPMENT FRONT 35 FEET , , N SSS ESTATES RESIDENTIAL) SIDE (STREET) 20 FEET 5 _, ; ' 4- K il( The Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) and the North ACREAGE 54.73 ACRES SIDE (HOUSE & GARAGE) 10 FEET = • W g Half (N 1/2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1 /4) of the Southeast 0varter (SE 1/4). LOTS 39.40 ACRES REAR 25 FEET ,_J z all in Section Twenty-three .95 ACRES Y - three ( 23 . ) Township Thirty Y - ( 31 , ) Range 8 Twenty-two Y ( 22 , ) OUTL OUROT A 4.95 ACRES SMALLEST LOT AREA 12,706 S.F. LARGEST LOT AREA 48 Anoka County, State of Minnesota, except the South 526.84 feet of the North 598.64 00130, B 0.44 ACRES ( ° ° CO w Di V e ' feet of the West 445 feet of the Southeast Quarter SE I 4) of the Southwest ,29 S.F. _ _ , / OVgRALL 5P.>3 ACRES AVERAGE LOT AREA 19,290 S.F. 1 1 \ • c Fe Quarter (SW 1 /4), Section Twenty -three (23), Township Thirty -one (3Q, Range ` - - CD en _ Twenty -two (22), Anoka county, State of Minnesota. 1 1 C X z ,^ BEING s FEET N ' DTH ANO ADJOINING CZ Z 4 g b SIDE LOT LINES AND REAR LOT LINES, SCALE IN FEET ^ AND 12 FEET IN WIDTH ANO ADJOINING 0 100 200 300 r d r STREET LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE ■ •• E INDICATED ON THE PLAT. es 1 inch = 100 reel 7 l_I Tr -1 !\ A 1� v t M Vr.l \ V TL- _ �l N .1 A V '' _ 1 n S. e n 2 IF- .. CI vrlr TJ C ENT E R R OAK:: J / N 1 I r -\ /; •r- TInn1 I ( ,)= / 1‘.1"- VI L 1 / �/, L, fl N t5,:( ``` I / ..-/ 1 < c � � ° h _ - __ - _ - -__ 33 3 OUTLOT l / / 45'a1 1 60TU \ ° 13i 5.76 S69 ° 29302 E I _ ° ..64�, J 0 1 , __I - t / r I \ I ] j 9° I 2 1 3 41 $ -Gag I N / \ 2 E O s " b.. saw Tr 2 2 2.E7 w V en J 13 .55 ,3' l�^ -' I t- s 004 6001 a y 9255 sF. r - ,� = 0 5 es W 'l t' Co - l r �,w.00 1' 05 r aoo 11 . 1560 i 22450 22450 �� - - 1 1. eax 1. B j 6.=e i t B6 U i 0000 1 Cs l ,¢' T 95.0° - d 1 r 325,!9 - 1 >=t 96 Na I • I 445.05 N89 °29'02 -w 1R 13 265 s. 4 1 118 1 t I 1 ° I. Ba :', 1 q( 6 12 459 Sr sr. II - II ' 56;;--; rz 8 X97 c m II- II S II $ 1g Jo A . e1 O S .� O "� .r 1 ' - n r l s 7 6 4 JJ >] 9= a. 2 .JJ S f. - l m 3x57' Sr. r 1 1 i{ - ^19131 a 11 5 II Je. I SF. I 3)66 =6.91 - _$Lv ow§ 8 Ir a 3 J O 1 2 z ,M°' I: ea,* I I 3 a 2 1 I I 11 1 1 3373 SC.II II II I A e ' I° - '1 m 5 Q 1 S .w \ 4 1 sr. ,8363 z e 6 SG c I I I I - S I I 11 I I 11 1 /' al l c 1. O ^ 8376 S F e?°� Si l -0 T 11 a ye L B6 Bo- L 0628 J 1_ 06_10 L -1. L 222B- J 1 89, J GI J a c a 1= 3 �e4 - \ 017 se. 6,11 J I Sa 30 , a? 3 Y 0. - 56 ° I -` z N L \ -j 1 t b 6_, 5757 1 39.6 -i_ 21393-- L'e )39.54 J HUNTERS I (9 w Y� 4) \ \ I / L . 2 --)'-'11--- ` m ' - 1 4 ' ) • _ _ ; , 3 r 65 '\ e L50.17J 3 aJ - 199-1-i P LA A l •3" ^ S ¢ m ' )' \ k , I° IsS�_ - --°- ' A . ` io - T ,iaewso a9:z 11. is 1 r 1 66 7 72 - 1 66 7 72 - 1 1 es �s � / Im x709 g1 . 505 11 II I I II 11 °, I L 5vo w : ' (z(ri s 1 // �_ xIPARTRIDGE `w >e* \1 u 5 u 4 1 3 II 2 u 1 l rrB. � r - 26:62 - /r I,a.S - 1 ° -, I C v • o Y / // ' -.hr 0.0=85 �' 3 o �L y � 9 11 6 I I 54 s.r 85 19 S,71900 9 kg, ansr. 11 laws Sr a l / I I/ l/ n I E) O I '- 4 // 7I.J01r 9 1 . 751f62.)2 a 1 1 01 11 \ ' > 7 11'159555.F.11„ IM IIn I{^ II PI '$ I. / 9 �l - (:) I ,oE w 330,75x , / �� 1I u , u 1 t' 1 'B0445F117° I IE. II Ii n l m rvl 5 .7// ' OUTLOT A o V � p c 5 11 ° I1 1 I \ a 1 1 ' I1- I I 11 I I 1 I I 171. / 4 7 / 9 n sa% ° zlwn sr. o z . - - i / 6 7 .11 8 9 ✓1 B7.., BB . aa 1 W - . - _ (; ) U /0 v v, F .l w /, H �1 I 1m9 IT n 11 II 3J JL___J L_. 2 -J L__ByJ 1169,65x. ° /I _ !I 6 M / / 20,29 Sr. - 1 2/ 19x21 SF, IT I,BJ22 `>F m1I1ews Sr SF. 'p ls5 W „ e j1 9 „s Jl o_7, � r - as -, / /;' / 0 ca 1 „ , I: // �/ °I ° 11 n 1 �� v 6J J 1 \, I- ' ' 0 '29 0 , �� S 1 / / / 3.5� l )1500 s Er gl O GC t--- 2?_s- _Jt__1 ;.69__3/, II 11 9 99 �� -` ° r -4 , °° � �9 e3 " 5 � l ■ 1 .� c ., ,6. J a x910 1 7 SAOe `-'$9, 11 J 1- ; -' ^ ' \ 't 1=00 � �4 \` m W z S ID ___ . _ I;I I.�T \ \ /I -��JL pi§ - -311' S a 9 ry 1 " (;) 13 l \ \ / 7 ' 1 ■ 1. c 1 i s. I QU e 2e G 6 a \ " 3 20 i / ' IAo -_ r ' 10 _ J Y 1a 00 " F.1 1 2 N a ` r L C60 C ` S ' " z ne O 0 - ❑ = I O :) i w ve Y _ m \ 2000 s F` 164 s.1.. m. sFI 11 1 e ? .J '0p I '` / � \ vaJ S0. E .'1 a1-4 / 1 9 1 9 SF. 1854. S F. 5562 51. ]p T b . , F ^ ) < `" 7 \ \ \° 1P0,7 3.f I /ill X52 SF. i'1 / l '`J I i �" v _ 21 V A // ' s''' .1// U ° 6 ye 1 1 o 1 ei / I fl.1 x5 ` y y W J to _ 445.05 589 °29'02 ^E t 1 \ ofi / s R / I 1 " a +`' - / o o 2 . , - � 2)9 Z \ J S i' 0 1 \ �'' .ee/ / / 1 0 -I l n I I . d, z b 6 LL,, lJp ml l' - -1 5 9 73.2 LV L- 9; J2 JLBJ.E_, L _� > / I 9 g ♦ ,`> F4 lreoo01r63.w o) i' �'� 1 Jo R_� - °JL JL_ 20010 3.3.2 I11A f - ' Nj H I \\ 'Li"' S .i . 3° - a / 1 S ` w l 79, �;: DUPRE STRE �° e 51.. p ,, � \\ L 57_3 A 4 -1 t,! \ \ : -,i 3301..^ 1 A / ! - II S \;\ O 5,7 y Qo 7. \ \ 11 I 11. _ J ( 18 3 - /v / I l l- V op. P 19]SJ Sr I \ \ `a / 6' .e 2z 1 ° -- �"- 592 \ -- ° . ti' I I 11 W - � \ 26 °,n a \ $ 22 - a/ f � Po r 63 1 ■ - _ sxaol ---- 9375 _ _ 133 . W \ Sr 253 11 s0J �,3 1eise LI \ $, - - -'_a9 32500 Z p+ Z j , \ 1 1 \ 27 16 SF. 2 0 3 . i 55 • ° _ K i a - 1 ) 1321 N89 ° 1 9 ' 4 1 "W 5 60 \16196 sr ' 24 L LAT2 __ • 0 �/ 8 il 12 / / l z `� \\ 1 J 1 17326 III r ry d' I " a ' O.J J 1 / 1 1. / / / , � - _ \\ of L! �. ° 'I 8 x 11 .. fi -c• 1047° s'`' ml ,8496 sr. / ' 11 4 44 -3 27 \ \�- z.� g a1 I 2 3 ` a 155.74 3 ,11/ d. � : Y 2 °J2.275 e.5'5' 0 11 " 26454 Sr. tP) 8 Y L , ` 7I I 16860 Sr. .� f -e ° 1 ti/ / C 1 _,Q7 0.'v __ 61 157 1 F: 2 '___ - - -J L p20/ A ' 112, •5615 r. 21 I / ' /''� : Q S , d - -' L 339 . n R __JO. //.!_ / d • 2 8 '$ e ALL AR� CT 4 S ° I$ ' r 1_ __J C / c 12 ` to 77 s / s� o of r .- �'.?15•7•" fl y - . 4. ' 15 _ ° 5 S / i � ,� _- 1922 F. U R . ° B II ° 11 io0. l3E1 h J S8 0.' 'v Jo>L T 15 1 ..-...,e e / I I 9 °1 / /: / / Z I .- ' - 29 11 " ° di 2 0.11 Eh' 3 � $ �1 in n t -- 13 j ' 13 // 9� i e n i') o ° 30785 SF. a 16 3r X. 23 Sr' / / 5-t. 2,:),,-.z....; 2,:),,-.z....; ; < ) I R 3 206 SF11 .. id I '7 3 1 // / / // / // ,J l r m 0 .I I, 30 F U9m sill C ;-J82 1 ` T e// " mss SC. 11 11 91 29 -_ 1 /_ 14 +7 o o OC r ' / 11 i1 � 16 Jo 14 \w / /� • �. /n. / / e9a sag/ o BS1P a1 . 6. p� \ 7 \$ $ u' / 4 1n. V) 0 Y to w I 4 f "57' Sr. \t ° // /_M . ., // v) DRAWN B PLM I I - L' 29137 1 JL�_63 o Sl rS''4�\� X 1 M1 \ \ ' S v ' 2 � \ �� 1 ` �/ 15 g a 34 \ 1 , .\ �( g ` 2, J.6 3.F - 40 DATE Ni 5 I onoo 1reomlE - 1 1\ \11.660 sr. I - \, 3 ,D 10 /zs /oo 1O 1 1 11 11 1 \ \ $ 112 94. L1 ,t t2 O t !' .y \fi t g co O II II 1 1\57 3 i / ^! '� � L_I]zp I - r 1., \ r' S- - \. 5 \ \ \ k /S REVISIONS " 40 1 15 39 iz 38 36 1 1 3 5 \ 6 r te' 3 17554 S /- o I =� U-1 = I8 9 5.0 1.517 Zr. 1 ;533 ]5 Sr ° 6U 37 B Sr 1 6975 Sr 1‘ 6 ,. . M1 % II eq \1 J 'Y ' �'° i r M � � 16 U I I I 11 13 53 � �7 ° 3\ 20 \ .P / / ll so. \ \ =1852 SF q p _ be L 100.0! JL- eoy3Jl_mmJi _Jul_ f 6 /2 � 7; iaJ 22 ■ 1 S 7 21 1 ` 1 „ 8959x5. 31 \; I/ 17 y� 2005 S \\+ ° I . Y / 1.°.F1: \‘‘,//0.- „ /a , 2F \\ i ____. DUPRE ' STREET R ii' 6x78100. \I\ ` ` 1 1 )/ wi U i BOOK/PAGE • iJaT6 _ -'°1i 1 y'S^ 1 70 o3i J LJmJ� � L 46_°J '577 J� ;5255 \ � \no81 20 u 33 JJ 11 0. 1315.63 N89 °26'55 °W _ _____________ _______- _____- _____- __- __ -__ -__ __�_ -" -'-' -' PROJECT NO. 20237 FILE NO. 1 -00 -233 1 SHEET 2 OF 8 0 c N I —0 r .. I I ° a in _ = _2 N = • _I N I L 1 I W 1 I �w F El =8, 1 Co '0 4 r ` r E v r L VA . - I n'(^ I lnnl(C' ` W [ n k v IIrr ff r 44 Y I ( 1 CO I /lr r J H ±� 11 I w� T IC E�) � � . � � C / , — r a ry € _IN 1 --- 0 _ .„----- _ __ * f Flu rr L :^ LI E IS,d v L • = . + t jf vrvI1L._ I }_ I o- xcaQT : uz' a l P o° c II - TCH w.wncE O ) r _ H (, ) U 7 ono r, o c= _ �,�^j I , EXISTING CRUq.2 � I E-1 Z V o a el II I e l 7e r W zcao s11N4 NRNNALR W ° F I 611 W O6' 0 Lt 0 EXISTING ELECTRIC BOX I { 5 ( } + 90o cc EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION " I I I I I EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE S EXISTING WETLAND I II - - - - EXISTING GRAVEL SURFACE I —b,. EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE EXISTING FENCE N DRA BY SS I j -. ... O EXISTING TREE LINE /TREES I !� - - - EXISTING CONTOUR DATE i f ) 1 _ _ _ 10/26/00 I i _ 1 - - EXISTING WATERMAIN 1 REVISIONS - I � - - c EXISTING SANITARY SEWER - I / v BENCHMARK SCALE IN FEET TNH ON CORNER OF DUPRE ROAD te VOYAGER COURT 913.50 0 _ 100 200 300 CAD FILE TNH ON CORNER OF PIONEER LANE & EAGLE TRAIL 911.69 20237EX TNH ON CORNER OF DUPRE ROAD Sr PIONEER LANE 911.96 1 inch = 100 feel PROJECT NO. 20237 SHEET 3 OF 8 1 1 V a CC w "71 11 I z 1i p I 1 � \ { — — — — Q W V v t V L v-, = in . L _- I 1 1 1 l II f� i / fl p y it* T \ \ V s. l c � .��, - . � �c�1t� / / / L� / /� wad e' 1 ' t �lY. ®.�� _'� vj 1 ' Em 1 ,. ]l 2 O yE C) 4 . ` • -. I -a r __ �i1i i ll rlS ik a o T A �x 5 � ... ,... , t „ y , ,.____,,,#), ,} \ ro, o CJ a 4, 1 s �! - -.. I I � 1�s L... _ ae " 5 I & P--.4,.. n 1 )16 1 5 . \ IL W li s tit w re.„ ID 9 s IIN , It ?I' .1 __Lx• ---K ------,plsr -- -- J c 4 52 z 5 t 1 2 OEM di a r # '---- , "-",,,,,,,,,„&„ '\ .4 ri c n I 4 a i; 1; 4 r 1 I 1 , I I f 2 ISTING n AND a Q W c il i •• gz 0 `1 5. Fill • 1FGEN0 3266571 wE SOFT= ExC OJ 499 vA TED ACRES g Q °¢ � ,1 WEiI AND HI I_ AREA W 0 j A EXISTIN G ELECTRIC METER re 1 _ 111,602.60 S0. FT. = 2.5620 ACRE CC '' 1 o / - .�� .� EXISTING ELECTRIC BOX Q.1 p = EXISTING AIR CONDITIONING UNIT C5 O 2 EXISTING GAS MARKER { >1 EXISTING GAS METER 5 0 �'�� esimen '' 2 J ` MITIGATIOM1 AREA y Ii I- 1 �^_ 4� , -` . / t h o o EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION 112,67267 S0. FT. = 2.5866 ACRES Qi n 44 EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE _, a o ���� , •r I 7 i — � -- EX.ST..G CONCRETE S,.RFACE u I\ s )' �yyw' 0 p / � a a• EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE N . �� a � �� , - ) �- EXISTING FENCE a 1 L / ^"^^'�^^' ^�^'^ EXISTING TREE LINE /TREES /s 4 1 _ — -i� t� ` " ' ,. ...... .... _. EXISTING CONTOUR . - . y "I ! _ ` DRAWN BY CMR � _ .. ��� � ��/� �''.� ' EXISTING WATERMAIN GATE i _ u]� 02 ` _ 0 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AI ( I . — _ — c - -- ® EXISTING STORM SEWER -- - -- EXISTING WATER LINE 10/26/00 1000 PROPOSED CONTOUR AOUAnc / ® A PROPOSED STORM SEWER REVISIONS BENCH : PROPOSED SILT FENCE ' stair. � TEMPORARY ROCK ID �� � a f I4 L. OONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SCALE w FEET o p `` �..+ ..... a ' T �1: •t:� �. ' eooPO PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION 0 _ 100 150 � 1 inch =50 bet I li /j •-' i-w cm M "!YO'! at: 1-1 PROPOSED WETLAND FILL ar. a..�.a t. A ..19 � t�'O.,O , -. PROPOSED WETLAND MITIGATION BENCHMARK 913 Y- Tw.NFD NF. . � I K • 1 NW - _ f ' - ,pM TNH ON CORNER OF DUPRE ROAD & VOYAGER COURT 911.50 CAD FILE 101 y yM TNH ON CORNER OF PIONEER LANE & EAGLE TRAIL 911. 202376 3 7 It Wall co art ECRU TNH ON CORNER OF DUPRE ROAD & PIONEER LANE 911.86 ro ..ea Aar moo as =ALE= _ •` ROCK CONSTRUC71ON ENTRAPEE PROJECT No. 20237 CROSS SECTION$II FFNCF r SHEET 4 OF B , c0 Ill 1 Nn r I .' EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE s ? z e I EXISTING GRAVEL SURFACE _ " 4 n. ¢ m- EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE • w o 0 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CC Z r il •. EXISTING FORCEMAIN -- r EXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONE z y g —i E %15T WELL G UNDERGROUND GAS MAIN w + ', O 0 EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOX CD = EXISTING MAILBOX m - k— EXISTING FENCE E w ° a �— EXISTING WATER MAIN w-- Z MIL o— EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SEWER , v Q S ALL WATERMAIN IS PC 0-900 • . PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER —D d - E ALL SANITARY SEWER 15 PVC SDR 35 1— " -1 -1— PROPOSED WATER MAIN I ALL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES ARE WITH .1 DROP -- -- - ? PROPOSED STORM SEWER I I xtm TER I, .- , .... _: ..- - n _ 1] - — 1 .° '"y / �/" Gpr _ r e &r I aw" a /i � �....._..� e ; � i — - — 6gysa � H ..� i 000 <i =epi.z I[7� W i 1;2,:i 1 ¢j , 5 3 1 r & r ;2 3 2 i I I 1 I se =_ �_ i g y3 c 1 J 8 7 6 i i 5 4 i i i 1 I e,5" o _as I± 2 3 2 1 u�� 4 II II " II II II I flu L -� `£e L.– J r • nu. eiartm nrt \._ I �' / ' ���., 4 IIr _ - --lr— -I r - -T - T r --- , r...; I 3 I ,, c� d^^ ... ( 1 6 11 4 II 3 2 1 ,:ti r - -- T 1 7 r' - - - --I II �� /i/ fir- �r - �r -- 1 v 7 � II II i I i r BUTLBT A Iz z cf) // ll' II 1 'I 1 A 1 A II II / ti. i ' // 5 1 6 • n 8 n \ ' \ \ \\ 11 I . I 4 11 5 // x a. .. (;) C'4 C3 I "' // rr 7 II 1 1e � v 1 1 n L__- _L �L —_ �L 6 Il. G' OI _ // I II II ■ it A L__31.--- rr1 H I 14 .0+ i t 1 // _ 1 C I f I L y'_ C �J I II ∎I ------ , - U d arc - �� 10 j 9 10 11 12 13 j fa L //� 1 F J s 19 F _ t 1 ° .._ i 21 `0v / / I _ , ' - v v - Iv ' 1 l i { 10 i r s 9." ° W • Ilk I .... �. -�G�� 11 1 ,1 J_ _� I L �_ / / 9 i i 8 w iz C1¢ ii ` , ��� II 11i _ ----� I 2 18 r' \\ /� � �/ / �; \� Q 1 _ 26 1 I 1 { I w x _ I 12 a a 25 24 1 1 ' 1 7 I /, °11 J /'1r - I i 1 ,:' 29 i 30 11 31 li 32 i 33 I � I /i 13 /I L -.,I // DAT L � IL _� - J_� --1 \ 1 1 r \ , , y m �,. -: 1`J to /2 / o0 " � RE `�SIONS 40 39 38� 37 36 \ \ _ -� \ \\ , / 20 I x 21 ` / 18 r 17 t \ \\ ?NH ON CORNER OF DUPRE ROAD & VOYAGER BENCHMARK ' L ^ _ � / 22 \\ \ / GOURT 913.50 "J� J 1\ \ �/ / 11 \\ SCALE Ix FEET , _JL_ JL__ / \\ \ I NH ON CORNER OF PIONEER LANE & EAGLE TRAIL 911.69 �tlllJ.{� ]l �t 0.... /, i \ \\ \ \\ / )�/ 11 \ \\ TNH ON CORNER OF DUPRE ROAD & PIONEER LANE 911.86 0 IOp 200 300 1 inch - 100 1x1 : -_ _____� JL a \_. E CAD FILE _.. �______ CAD FIL PROJECT NO. - 20237 SHEET 5 OF 8 , v m 8 m 8 m a m m - a a a m a 0 a a a a a a m a m >- 2 a a a m a m m a m m m m a m 930 930 — Wn _ r = \m 925 925 Cr M m C > > n Z V n 8 a Y> v w o c. W ° w d w 920 o Y 3 s s F. m s a 6. N �4 z s 920 a 7 m o.o $ a m o o + ... + n a + m a n 6 1 n m n S a 9+0000 P _ E EC 5 ry • : fi +000 PM - N - t1 +00.00 PN - w^ a. _ m n m L m m a 912.40 PN ELEV + „ 912 tB PN ELEV - - 913.19: PM ELEV PROPOSED GRADE Z u 915 .. vc-10am - vc =10000 ' vG =too 00 915 ^ 0- 8 8 a M =013.. a M•0 ^' M=a to EXISTING GRADE + d gi a t _ OSOZ c5ox - OWF -O5Ox 0932 * 910. ° —� 910 - 911 44 P) +5195 3+00 70 PVI ELEV N ELEV -_ _ O ZO PN \\ 91➢ F 10+39N PN - - -__. o i 10000 o z > Htt 53 PM ELEV > o ----- u 905 m VC -100 oo 6 �>, M =o¢ y 2 9 VC=10000 9 x a w 905 ` m M =020 o 8 Y Y 5 . .90 1 a .. 1 7s a w M =o 19 3' w o 5 6 + �' x a a & o a o a a x 5 1 ev m o m m m S a 900 w < m „ 900 s m m '" m a _ z m m. m m m _ ^' - m' �a;es6 a SS ` ,� 895 3a Leg 895 L a=tl a P•eo tl - 890 d s> 890 885 885 04-00 1 +00 2 +00 3 +00 4 +00 5 +00 6 +00 7-i-00 8 +00 9 +00 10 +00 11 +00 12 +00 13 +00 14 +00 15 +00 m m P m m DUPRE ROAD zg m m m m 0 n m o o a e a 930 m a m a m m m m a a m m m m m 30 N 5 9 9 p a E" - w s S! 925 925 E ✓ C m w w xl a o 920 , aw 5 = 920 x °< x s . : S5 a W a b L1" � o / w 915 m o 3 m 20+00 00 PIA o + m + p a+ N m 915 -- n° . .. m 910.39 PN ELEV it 3 r 29 +5000 PA 8 n fn VC= 100.00' :m ^ 9 909.15 PN ELEV. '.. M -0.21 A PROPOSED GRADE VC= 100.00' m °m n ' M= 0.12_ -910 050% P EXIS11NG GRADE 910 19x . - _ _ _ _ _ _ 905 17+30 00 PN - -- a .. w 2N51.90 PM _ 909.01 PN ELEV. a i 90Zn PM ELEV: z. r 905 DRAWN BY tl VC= 1 p > VLdOD00 a n o 5 PLJ .9 g 4 =a. i x i O 4 =021 r R S DATE 900 S• o a 3 • a . m a. a 900 10/26/00 z _ 5 e P' al °+` a E$ • u a e • • m S a REVISIONS R as a y _ .:.: 08 '3° m 8 8 • ° 895 2 g 8 $ m l m m 895 ' e y gtl 2$ • BOOK /PAGE > W $90 2 a n a 890 _�— CAD FILE 20237PRF BSS PROJECT NO $$51 20237 14 +00 15+00 16 +00 1/ +00 18 +00 19 +00 20 +00 21 +00 22 +00 23 +00 24 +00 2b +00 26 +00 27+00 28 +00 FILE NO. SHEET 6 OF 6 V P. ^ w n 0 n q Si n umi N ry o r 0 o 2 o m o m m o ° o J _ - - _ _ _ ce w n o m _ _ o m x o a _ _ _ w p - u a f m m q m q q m m ' w m m m w m q m m m w w m ° W m 925 w 925 [ r • N <. : q .'rte` El 920 W L S a o I. 34 1 _ w w ° ag 8a 8 n $ i a 920 w n 9 a + m q a 25 9 � 1J n n E. 6 m a g n _ z w LL ^ 2 d PROP OSED GR ADE a 8 ° m- -I 915 y W + n m 915 5+5000 P•I m N m m 910'50 PN ELEV o E%ISING GRADE m .. o w, \ F 340000 PM PROPOSED GRADE ° w CD ° °°` 90925 PM ELEV - VC =100,00 'm c m •0•10000' M =013 OSOx 1 Sox • 102 W v m _ ` E %1511344 GRADE -D �3x -' 910 -_- M o / r 050% 0 50% .. 9 11 / \v\ .- _ - -- ° i p 91083 PM ELEV n g M 7--kii4, 905 o a 1 ' 7 ° u oho Or 8 9 05 . 2+2500 PN m 3 2 PROPOSED GRADE 6 > w w ° 910 PVI ELEV CD 900 5 5 ° 5 n VC-t00 CO + „ EXISTING GRADE a x u ° n n x 0 n c m N -025 w u ' CV _n a > p n o m m^ _ o n + w n n m.. . m . n 900 m o d w _ m ° o ° - O1 m w m + n O w in w n m u m 1. p ° & p m N p C r 5 8958 895 a °Bi o a ° w _b `voe gfh a 3 v: I i - _%E.e; 890 890 ill li . 885 885 _ 880 1 0 +00 1 +00 2 +00 3 +00 4 +00 5 +00 6 +00 0+00 1 +00 2 +00 3 +00 44-00 0 +00 1 +00 2 +00 il PHEASANT LANE MALLARD COURT GROUSE HOLLOW z 925 m m a a m w m w m 925 PI 44 W w g 0 a o xa s m E 0.6 920 5 > . a " ;' w a _ _ 5' o 920 I - aw aW 0 3 = W a¢ 915 2 ° ° o. $ p. " PROPOSED GRADE ° _ 915 Y �+ > 1.D°oo PM. i 0 10+0000 PM i 8 • -? a W � 1 V Q 1 ^ 90986 PM ELEV 4 909 60 PN ELEV o n s ° E %IS ➢NG CRAOE + - > m m VC- 100.OD m } V ____,. 0' m a w a M - 017 M - 0 12 910 __- $ m 910 m C 0 r-_- D.wx ' ^ 905 o w 5 +2200 PM w ' -__ n +DD.00 PN. g 905 0 8 y. 90748 PN ELEV - 907 _ b > VC- 10000 l o 909]6 PM ELEV ° > q S 5 M.013 w i 3 > 1908E16 Y-0 ° PVI ELEV o> 1� 5 : z u w w i a q 5i d VC- 10 000' G 5 y 900 m° °> 4 i a 0 < n 0 n x= S a M =013 o a g n _ , $ A o ° s 900 ° e m $ o ,�. ,� n o , • > _ DR A WN BY n n 0 m m � m � o Vi n + P °. ± i °� n § m R w n . m .Yi AT q w o n ° q - ^ n q ° - m DATE 895 895 10/26/00 REVISIONS 890 890 BOOK /PACE 885 885 .. -- CAD CAD FILE 20237PRF PROJECT NO 880 , 880 20237 0+00 1 +00 2 +00 3 +00 4 +00 5 +00 6 +00 7 +00 8 +00 9 +00 10 +00 11 +00 12 +00 134-00 14 +00 FILE NO, PARTRIDGE LANE PARTRIDGE PLACE SHEET 7OF8 A • m o 2 2 _ n n N g w m 930 930 925 925 • i fat w w 6 CC z ax w _ 920 ° a } a n $ m° s a "^ 5> 920 / � A` � 2 +0000 PN m } m m o _ AT 0 - S E / � W g e ET 91 S PROPOSED GRADE 912 S�PN ELEV, - 915 6 3 W EXISTING GRADE m _. _ , o n ... $ _. J 150'6 , PROPOSED GRADE o -. d S r ° 0505 -093; 0.505 m EXISTING GRADE 910 910 o 911 6 DS v -- _ ° 911 PN ELEV 91215 PIA ELEV S 0505 ¢ ° o ° z VC =1WW vC 1W DD = - 905 rl n 5 al N.018 r N.013 w __ 905 ¢ � 5 I +DO PN F P > z 1 n L 90810 PO ELEV 900 O n^ d 1 1 . f w 4.011 900 a E a u S o + n ¢ m ry ° a ° n : drm 64 a `� r 9 _ ob . I i r m P seX ; 1 a . 895 ;nE 1 : n 895 >es as ce ma. 890 890 885 885 0 +00 1 +00 2 +00 3 +00 4 +00 5 +00 - 0 +00 1 +00 2 +00 MALLARD WAY QUAIL COURT ij i Wo =0 a� z ya ssry <jr F 6 W QO 0 C) 3. 0i rl DRAWN BY PLJ DATE 10/26/00 REVISIONS BOOK /PAGE CAD FILE 20237PRF PROJECT NO. 20237 FILE NO. SHEET 8 OF O