My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
city of gem lake resolutions
GemLake
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990 - 1999
>
1997
>
city of gem lake resolutions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2019 3:11:50 PM
Creation date
7/1/2019 3:07:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Jauunzy3, 1997. <br />Page No. 2. <br />,Tujy Meeting <br />This meeting should be devoted to long-range planning, Metropolitan Council could provide <br />information relative to its "blueprint" or other planning efforts. Mn/DOT and Ramsey County could <br />discuss their long-range plans and studies. This might also be an opportunity to get long-range <br />planning .information from. Washington and Anoka Counties. This world also provide an <br />opportunity for timely input into the capital improvement programs of the various agencies. <br />September ? ieetbig. <br />This meeting shouldbe devoted primarily to specific CMT plaus for the future. A review of all road <br />projects in the CMT report should be made and any needed updates or Agency prodding shouldbe <br />isc+�-sscd, The work program for the next calendar year should also be apart of this meeting. L.ocal <br />issues could also be discussed in more deWi, <br />Nayemher Meeting <br />This would primarily tic a 1ettovcr and housckceping meeting. Election or seleetiou of chairman of <br />the MT, setting of dates and agendas, and the gcner:al.deteruiiitation of next:year's playas should be <br />made. It would also provide an opportunity for specific project updates such as the 1-694 and I-35E <br />corumon se4tiori, If the: model is updated in calendar year t997,: this could be the target meeting for <br />presentation of the: updated inforrrnation.. <br />Sol sultant Role <br />We have discussed the role of the consultant in our September 1.0 letter and at the November <br />meeting. We would like to minimize our role, but maximize the effectiveness of the Corridor <br />Management Team. Por calendar year 1996, an initial review of our costs indicates a fee of about <br />53,600.O0 for the year. Ibis is well within the initial budget of $5,000.00. We feel that we can be <br />more effective without. spending any adds oaal funds if the CMT can adopt a.schedule of meetings <br />and purposes, and additional duties can be spread to the various members.. Ramsey County,. <br />Mn/DOT and Metropolitan. Council are providing:scrvices. m kind in Iicu of a dollar fee. We can <br />provide the technical catalyst to obtain that information. and.additionai work We propose the budget <br />remain at $5,000,00. <br />If you need any additional Information on our thoughts for the schedule and agendas, please call me. <br />Sincerely, • <br />Olen .Van Wont r, P.E. <br />Manager, Transportation Department <br />sah <br />rRcoggsV.{E.HoNgrximi•z_nI j +�19}i9ATJi9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.