My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
08 CC AUG 1998 MINUTES
GemLake
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
MINUTES
>
1990 - 1999
>
1998
>
08 CC AUG 1998 MINUTES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2026 2:12:37 PM
Creation date
7/3/2019 8:58:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 04300
Document
MINUTES
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF GEM LAKE <br />MINUTES OF PUBLIC HEARING No. 98-04 <br />Rezoning PIN #22-30-22-44-0013-1 & PIN #22-30-22-44-0014-4 GB to R-4 <br />17 August 1998 <br />A Public Hearing for the purpose of receiving.cornments on (Proposed) re -zoning of the abovereferenced properties was: <br />convened at 7:05 pin on Monday, 17 August1998 in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford. Present were Mayor Emeott, <br />Council Members Birkebak, Kunin, and Nielsen, Treasurer Nordstrom and. Clerk Magnuson. Also present were Jim Lindner, Sandy <br />Kuchenrneister, Vern. Grundhoffer,.Bill Flaspeter, George Jungman, and Michelle Vining. <br />Motion by Birkebak, Second by Kunin to approve the.. agenda for the public hearing was unanimous. <br />Mayor Emeott explained that the purpose of the meeting was to receive public comment on (Proposed) Re -Zoning of the <br />abovereferenced properties. The. Clerk confirmed publication of thispublic hearing in the White Bear Press on 05 August 1998.and <br />mailing to all property owners within 350' of the affected property. <br />Having been considered by the Planning Commission, Mr. Lindner leadthe research and presented findings on: behalf of <br />the .Planning Commission. It was noted that the GB zoning had been provided many years ago to accommodate the then owner's: need <br />to store machinery on the parcel owned now by the City.. In accordance with the Comprehensive 'Plan, the GB zoning is inconsistent <br />with the Plan and detrimentalto the neighborhood. It is also inconsistent with the Zoning Ordinance (No. 43). The Planning <br />Commission in it's report recommended re -zoning the property to R-4. <br />The Clerk reported that no written comments had been received. <br />Ms. Kuchennieister asked if the re -zoning would he:detrimental to the value of her land. The .Clerk noted that while <br />commercial property was generally morevaluable than residential; use of the land .in question as commercial is inappropriate with <br />can ent.and future land use identified the Comprehensive Plan. Emeott noted that in theevent her home were somehow destroyed <br />tinder current zoning she could not rebuild. <br />Mr. Lindner as a land owner near the property also supprted the re -zoning. <br />There were only general questions and comments from the City Council and staff, <br />The Mayor thanked those present for attending. <br />There being no further business, the: Public Hearing was adjourned at.7:I9: pm on motion by Nielsen, Second by Birkebak <br />and unanimous vote.. <br />AUTHORED:. 17 September 1998. <br />APPROVED: 21 September 1998 <br />ATTEST: <br />Frederic C. Magnu on <br />City CIerk <br />ATTEST: <br />Paul R. Emeott <br />Mayor <br />e-file. hearings11998198-0419804fehm <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.