My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006 04-10 CC MINUTES
GemLake
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
MINUTES
>
2000 - 2009
>
2006
>
2006 04-10 CC MINUTES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2026 11:59:56 AM
Creation date
7/15/2019 10:44:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 04300
Document
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF GEM LAKE <br />MINUTES OF PUBLIC HEARING NO. C20.06-01 <br />10 April 2006 <br />Genf Lake Public Hearing No, C2006-01 was convened at 7:04. PM on Monday, 10 April 2006 in the First floor <br />meeting room of Tousley Ford. Mayor Emeott, Councilors Watson, Bosak, Schilling and Rasmussen, Clerk Magnuson <br />and Pro ec1 Engineer Mitchell were present. Also present were the following residents: <br />Molly McPhillips <br />3619 Big Fax Road <br />Ben McPhillips <br />3619 Big Fax Road <br />Carol Schacht: <br />1201 Little Fox. Lane <br />Mary.Jansscn <br />1161 Little Fox Lane <br />Cheryl. Kirchoff <br />3744 Big Fox Road <br />Ken Kirchoff <br />3744 Big Fox Road <br />Jim Kohler <br />3673 I3ig Fox Road <br />Rollie. Birkebak <br />3775 Big Fox Road <br />Tim f leil <br />3800 BiLi Fox Road <br />Shcrrcn. l-Icil <br />3800 Big Fox Road <br />Kimberly Anderson-Urpen <br />3646 Big Fox Road <br />Robert Uxpen <br />3646 Big Fax Road <br />Kelly Jonas <br />3647 Big Fox Road <br />Duane.l3erkas <br />3674 Big Fox Road <br />Diane Sweet <br />3756J3ig Fax Road <br />Mark. Sweet <br />3756,13ig Fox Road <br />Dawn Segermark <br />3635:Big Fox Road <br />Craig :Ral erty <br />3750 Big FOX Road <br />Motion by Bosak, Second. by Watson to approve the agenda for the public hearing was unanimously approved.. <br />Clerk Magnuson reported that the public hearing was properly noticed with Public Notice No. :2006-09a.published <br />in the White Bear Press. on 29 March 2006 and Public Notice No. 2006.0.9d mailed on 28 March 2006 to all feetitle <br />owners ofreal property on Big Fox Road and Little Fox Lane based upon records of Ramsey County Property Records <br />and Revenue. <br />Mayor Emeott made opening remarks, stating that the process of securing a feasability study for the reconstruction <br />of city streets began 2003, was ordered in April, 2005,.upgraded in July 2005 to includecity water and: sewer, and <br />reviewed in March, 2006. The final ieasabilitystudy forthe work isto be presented: here this evening. Emeott noted the <br />inclusion of city waterand sewer in he feasability study was consistent with best management practices and thetime line <br />established in the Gem Lake Comprehensive Municipal Plan of 1997.. Emeott indicated that the. City is also haying a <br />feasability study completedfor development: of. a City Water Plan which at some time in the near future could put city <br />water in proximity to the Big Fox/Little Fox neighborhood. The primary purpose .of this hearing is to receive the Project <br />Engineer's Feasability Study and receive public commentfrom those affected bythe proposed improvements, <br />Engineer Mitchell then presented the Feasability Study and the Summary, copies of which are attached hereto. <br />Following Mitchell's presentation, Motion by Schilling, Second by Bosak to accept the Feasability Report for Public. <br />Improvement Project No. 2006-0.1 was unanimously approved, <br />Clerk Magnuson then read into the record written comments received from. Don Hewitt of 3614 Big Fax Road and <br />Thomas 1-lansen of 1231 Little Fox Lane, copies of which are attached hereto. <br />Mayor Emeott then opened the floor forpublic comment as follows: <br />CAROL SCHACHT <br />Why 3 ''l/ :asphalt? Mitchell responds to provide for 1 '/" overlay in future -. additional .S80m for.2". <br />Discussion of financing. Magnuson ;-,5% to 6% interest and up to 20. years. <br />Opposed to installation of speed bumps. <br />MANE SWEET <br />Would waterbe installed toproperty lines? Magnuson -Yes. <br />MARK SWEET <br />Do costs shown.include drain tiles and replacement at subsurface soils as needed or planned. Mitchell respondsper <br />plans. <br />Are there estimates of'pipe installation costs for the. future? Mitchell -No. <br />They have terrible well water and spend a substantial amount to treat same. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.