2007 06-19 CC MINUTES - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

photography and is able to do 3D modeling, They would participate at a public open: houseat the end of the. project. Total cost would not exceed $ 19,500. Mr. Halverson. wasasked how busy they were and if they could meet the. City's deadline. He replied that yes, SEH is large enough and has enough experience to do. it, The question was asked why the City didn't know about the ability of SEH to provide this service. early, Mayor Emeott responded that he justlearned about this at the last Planning Conunission meeting. OLD BUSINESS Cern Lake 2006 SWPP and MS4 report — Chuck Watson: Mayor Emeott reported that the deadline for this report was June 30, 2007. A. review of the White Bear Township report is underway. There was discussion about the fact that White Bear Township normally does not meet this. deadline. Attorney Kelly suggested that if the city was not goingto be able to meet the June 30th deadline that a letter is written to that effect. This topic will remain on the. agenda until completed. SEH feasibility study for water, sewerand roads for land parcels in. city: No discussion. Agenda .item is tabled until next meeting. Should Gera Lake join the Ramsey -Washington. Cable Commission? The city was unable to make contact with the Ramsey -Washington Cable Commission. Agenda item is tabled untilnext meeting, NEW BUSINESS Resolution 2007-12 Ramsey County request for support of .CSAH funding for county roads (Goose Lake and Otter Lake Roads). Mayor Emeott stated that he a request from Ramsey County asking forcity support CSAI-I funding to improveand upkeep county roads.. Themoney comes from state funds that pays forcounty roads and isno. additional cost to the city. Motion.. by Rasmussen, Seconded by. Schilling to send a letter of support Ramsey County to improve and upkeep county roads was unanimously approved by voice vote. Statement of Support - OK for VLAWMO. to use Storm Water Utility (SWU) for funding of Operations: Mayor Emneottstated that VLAWMO is asking for an opinion from the city on a new way to fund operations. Currently funding comes from the. City's General fund. The recommendation is to move this to themiscellaneous tax line on. the sewer bill. Every parcel of land will be examined to determine if good management of water is occurring and will get billed accordingly. Currently the cost is $14/1.5 per parcel and it is anticipated that under the.. new billing, some will pay $10/11 a parcel and some more. The total contribution the city ctuxently pays changes every year and this will not change. Other projects VLAWMO is workingon istocleanup the sewage that is. in Goose Lake. The city anticipatesminimal liability in this cleanup as it is charged back to the city's that are in that water shed district. Another VLAWMO planned projectisthe cleanup of Gem Lake, CurrentlyTousley.Ford's water run.. off drains into the lake. Motion by Rasmussen, Seconded by. Schilling. to use SWU for funding operations was unanimously approved by voice vote. Selection of Land. Planning advisor: Mayor Emeott opened to topic of the selection of a land planning advisor for discussion. Mayor Emeott stated that $30,000 was available in the engineering fund to pay for this advisor, Councilor Artig-Swomley stated she liked the idesof a coordinated focus and: the presentation by Putman. She suggests going with Options #2, 4, and 7. Councilor Rasmussen stated he also thinks theidea of hiring a planning advisor is prudent. He also likes the creativity of Putman, Councilor Schilling. stated he felt that both Putman and. SEH could do the job but he has hopped SEH would come in with a.price under $.15,000.Additional discussion around topic of sharing costs concluded that currently can't share this cost with a developerbecause currently the city does not have one selected. Mr. Putman suggested to the Council that Option #10 coupled with Option #3 has Page 3 of 4 Look for us on the World Wide Web at gemlakemn.org