Laserfiche WebLink
• YEARLY REVENUE COMPARISION <br />• <br />5500.000 <br />, <br />5a50;000 <br />s4SO000 <br />.. <br />5350.000 <br />.. <br />, <br />:;t.� <br />.5360.000 <br />.. <br />..11 <br />` <br />4, <br />5250,006 <br />v- <br />.41,„ <br />•;'�� <br />8260,000 <br />' <br />}.CFI:; <br />rixs <br />al. <br />Se;F; <br />``'T <br />:; _..._ <br />•ti <br />.$150.000 <br />.. <br />r <br />�..r <br />'.� �� <br />1t • <br />� � <br />�S <br />�' <br />S� <br />L�t - <br />r <br />JAN 1. JAN 31 FEB MAR APR MAY• JUN JUL AUG SEP. OCT NOV tEG• <br />ti 200E 227037 Li 2Ii <br />At the same time expenditures are below expenditures at the same time last year. This <br />is due to less being spent for City services provided by the Township now and legal <br />costs related to the annexation lawsuits. <br />YEARLY EXPENDITURE COMPARISION <br />.. .. .. <br />5550.000 <br />._ .. .. <br />- <br />:•'• <br />5500A00 <br />yr . <br />' , <br />5150.000 <br />:l <br />.. <br />;P.: <br />.. <br />.� <br />P.0 <br />�iA <br />•f <br />'pill <br />, <br />5350003 <br />w <br />-? <br />''. <br />it <br />if <br />:ra, <br />k+, <br />ti. <br />I-� <br />52C0.Q�O <br />rrrr <br />t=� <br />e-.`'- <br />r <br />a <br />'3;1 <br />..._ <br />511:0,000 <br />250.000 <br />i;.. <br />r:i <br />S.� . <br />... <br />, "1t <br />l <br />c <br />'1�` <br />rho <br />I <br />,�+, <br />. <br />�" <br />iret <br />w.5 <br />t.�v <br />v.. <br />,: <br />.._ <br />. ... <br />i <br />v:e; <br />{!Sees <br />i;1a•- <br />F:r_ <br />�•Is .,, <br />r-4 -A <br />� 1 <br />.:U <br />56. <br />JAN 1. IAN at FilS MWi. APII. 1.0W 7AN .JL Alfa. b aCT NO. QIIC <br />a 2000 I:1 2007 42007I ... . <br />Overall, I believe the City's expenditures will finish the year below or near budgeted. <br />amounts while revenues will be above budgeted revenues. <br />