My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1994 06-20 CCP
GemLake
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
PACKETS
>
1990 - 1999
>
1994
>
1994 06-20 CCP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2026 8:59:47 AM
Creation date
6/19/2019 8:19:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 00500
Document
AGENDA PACKET CITY COUNCIL
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
current problem in that it accomodates the dense development of <br />our northerly neighbors and will likely lead to a dramatic <br />increase in traffic on LaBore, to the detriment of our residents. <br />The second document is the SEH study of the traffic impact <br />of the Fontana proposal. Whereas the study focuses on the. <br />specific site in VH, the conclusion (p.9) clearly states the. <br />impact on E, and the LOS. study (p.E) indicates the future of <br />congestion at our interchange. Note that these studies assume <br />little: or no incremental traffic contribution from GL due to our <br />residential zoning. <br />One of the results of the Corridor Study was a proposal to <br />modify the goals and objectives of the VH Center Plan. The third <br />document is the existing goals, which includes several graphics <br />of the proposed build -out of the Center. Note that the <br />"preferred alternative" (p.4) indicates the Target site as office <br />space, which would offer a dramatically different traffic profile <br />than retail. <br />The fourth document is the "proposed" goals (changes high- <br />lighted) which recognizes the significant threat ❑f traffic <br />congestion caused by their development plans. <br />The Planning Commission feels that the traffic congestion <br />resulting from establishing two very large discount department <br />stores directly opposite one another in Vadnais Center will have <br />a serious negative impact on the quality of life in GL. We feel <br />that the City Council should resolve to protest this development <br />on behalf of its constituents, on the basis of the safety, noise, <br />pollution, and general aesthetics issues raised by this increase <br />in traffic, as well as the inconvenience caused our commuting <br />residents. We feel that there should be time allowed to further <br />digest the Corridor Study information and to formulate an overall <br />plan, with long-term goals, for the entire community surrounding <br />135E. The GL Planning Commission has been communicating with the. <br />VH Planning Commission to arrange a joint meeting to discuss <br />these issues. <br />Other matters: Mr. Bemis has indicated his desire to resign <br />from the Commission after his incredible, faithful, and diligent <br />service of some 37 years. Mr. Gardner volunteered to organize <br />some modest recognition of that contribution. The Golf Course <br />has indicated their desire to significantly increase their off- <br />street parking, and, while the Commission looks favorably on the <br />concept, Mr. Arend was instructed to inform them that they are to <br />initiate no changes on the site until they have developed a <br />complete site plan and it has been approved (landscaping being <br />the key issue) . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.