Laserfiche WebLink
City of Gem Lake City Council Meeting Minutes July 16, 2024 1 | Page <br />City of Gem Lake <br />City Council Meeting – July 16, 2024 <br />Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />Mayor Gretchen Artig-Swomley called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Councilmembers Len Cacioppo, Jim <br />Lindner, Ben Johnson, and Laurel Amlee were present. Also present: City Attorney Kevin Beck, City Treasurer <br />Tom Kelly, MPCA Hydrogeologist Michael Ginsbach, MPCA Environmental Specialist Drew Bahl, MN <br />Department of Health Environmental Research Scientist Emily Hansen, Planning Commission Chair Joshua Patrick, <br />Acting City Clerk Melissa Lawrence and residents Jim Wilson, David Birkebak, Steve Varley and Carol Schacht. <br /> <br />July 16, 2024, Agenda <br />A motion was introduced by Councilmember Linder to accept the agenda, seconded by Councilmember Cacioppo. <br />Motion carried 5-0. <br /> <br />Minutes <br />A motion was introduced by Councilmember Lindner, seconded by Councilmember Cacioppo to approve the June <br />18, 2024, City Council Meeting Minutes. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> <br />A motion was introduced by Councilmember Lindner, seconded by Councilmember Cacioppo to accept the July 9, <br />2024, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> <br />Special Presentations/Public Hearings <br /> <br />MPCA Update – Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Representatives Time Grape and Michael <br />Ginsbach <br />Michael Ginsbach of the MPCA shared with the Council and those in attendance a small update on the well <br />contamination in Gem Lake. A round of well testing took place in February for those that had their water <br />turned on outside, and another test was completed in May to get those that were not completed in February. <br />Some testing was also completed on the other side of the railroad tracks. The bonding bill was not approved <br />at the last legislative session, but the MPCA will continue to pursue it at the next session. Contamination <br />numbers are staying consistent with some areas slowly going down, with the exception of one property <br />whose numbers went up. <br /> <br />The Council asked Mr. Ginsbach a couple questions along the lines of: <br />• Where do we stand with well testing? <br />• When will the May results be published? <br />• Does the rainwater affect sampling? <br />A summary from Mr. Ginsbach was that more testing will be done in the future of the residential wells and <br />testing of potential sources of contamination. At this time, the one potential source is still Cortec <br />Corporation located on White Bear Parkway in White Bear Township. May results are ready, and Mr. Bahl <br />will get them put on the website and get the information to the Council. Rainwater can have an effect on <br />samples, it all depends on where the recharge zones are. <br /> <br />Some of the residents in attendance asked questions along the lines of: <br />• When will the next set of samples be taken? <br />• Can the contamination map be updated to accurately reflect house locations for elevation <br />difference purposes? <br />• With the speed of water penetrating the soil is there a chance something is going through the well <br />casing? <br />A summary from Mr. Ginsbach was that more sampling will take place later in the year and he will work <br />on getting the map and website fixed to reflect accurate information. Older wells may be more susceptible <br />to water penetration because they may not have been fully grouted. Standards have since changed. <br />