My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021 10-19 CC Minutes
GemLake
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - 2029
>
2021
>
2021 10-19 CC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2025 8:42:35 AM
Creation date
10/8/2025 8:42:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 04300
Document
MINUTES
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Gem Lake City Council Meeting Minutes October 19, 2021 2 | Page <br />Resolution 2021-010 <br />Councilmember Lindner introduced a motion for approval of Resolution #2021-010, which covers <br />Certification to the Tax Rolls of Overdue Septic Inspection Fees. Councilmember Cacioppo seconded <br />the motion, all in favor, motion approved. <br /> <br />It was noted that after these two certifications at the meeting, residents would still have 30 days to pay <br />their bills before the information was conveyed to the county for the tax bills. <br />Gem Lake Infrastructure Issues <br /> <br />Scheuneman Road Stormwater Workshop-Recap and Next Steps <br />The October 12 Workshop on Stormwater was well attended and there were significant <br />discussion of the Scheuneman Road Stormwater Report, which was prepared by SEH to address <br />flooding problems that happened in 2019. Two problem areas were addressed in the area. On the <br />northern portion of the road, flooding issues affected three homes, due to very unusual weather <br />conditions. Solutions would range in cost from around $100,000 to around $700,000, and would <br />not be guaranteed to significantly change the outcome of a 100 year flooding event. The solutions <br />would primarily benefit these three houses. Based on the data and after many questions, there was <br />consensus in the audience that the solutions not be implemented. Residents in the area felt they <br />were too costly for a once in a lifetime event. On the southern portion of the road, costs were <br />approximately the same, two or three homes were primarily affected by the waterflow, although <br />there was some discussion as to the fact that the topography of these particular lots could be the <br />primary cause of issues. It was decided that issues on the south end of the road needed some <br />further study before decisions were made. Justin Gese of SEH suggested a future workshop to <br />focus on this end of the road. <br /> <br />Gem Lake Trail/Tree Trust Report <br />Councilmember Cacioppo reported that the Tree Trust had begun planting the 72 trees that were <br />part of the settlement with Water Gremlin over pollution issues. These trees were being planted <br />on city property surrounding the Gem Lake Villas project and were being planted according to an <br />agreed upon plan. Issues regarding clean-up of dog waste were briefly discussed. Owner <br />responsibility for dog clean-up was re-emphasized. <br /> <br />Hoffman Road Slope Failure Update <br />Mayor Artig-Swomley presented a brief report from City Engineer Justin Gese, who could not be <br />present at the meeting. Two bids were received for the slope failure project. The work was <br />awarded to the lowest bidder, Dresel Company. Work has not officially started due to difficulties <br />with obtaining necessary supplies and the need to finalize the easement necessary to do the work. <br />Patrick Kelly is set to begin working on the easement. Gese is working with Ramsey County on <br />cost sharing for the project. <br /> <br />Proposal to Update Gem Lake Water Plan <br />Recent events regarding Gem Lake wells have caused the city council to request an update to the <br />2006 Municipal Water Plan for the City of Gem Lake. This plan was written to explore options <br />for bringing municipal water to some or all of the city in coming years. With this in mind, the <br />city’s engineering firm, SEH, submitted a proposal to bring the 15-year-old plan update and take <br />a fresh look at options. This proposal lays out steps for re-examining issues surrounding potential <br />water sources and presenting a water feasibility report to the council on or around January 18, <br />2022. The total cost of the report would be $21,590. Councilmember Lindner introduced a motion <br />to approve the proposal and go ahead with the study. Councilmember Cacioppo seconded the <br />motion, all in favor, motion approved.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.