Laserfiche WebLink
Ordinance No. 140 Domestic Animals Page 8 of 14 <br /> <br />Section 9. Vicious and Rabid Dogs. <br />1. Biting Animals Quarantined. Whenever any animal, other than a dog subject to the regulations of Section <br />7 8 of this Ordinance, has bitten a person, the owner or harborer custodian of such animal, having been so <br />notified, either orally or in writing, shall immediately quarantine said animal at the owners’ or harborers’ <br />custodian’s home or other suitable place of confinement, as directed by the law enforcement or Animal <br />Control officer of the City for a period of fourteen (14) days after the occurrence. During the quarantine <br />period, the animal shall be securely confined in a building or in a yard enclosed by a fence so constructed <br />that the animal cannot escape or otherwise leave said enclosure, and which will not permit other animals or <br />persons to enter, for the purpose of preventing the animal from biting or otherwise coming in contact with <br />persons or animals. <br /> <br />2. Rabid Animals. Upon a reasonable suspicion that an animal may be rabid, th e animal shall be subjected to <br />the necessary tests by a doctor of veterinary medicine for the purpose of determining if it is infected with <br />rabies. The confinement, testing, and treatment, in addition to all other expenses incurred as the result of an <br />animal biting a person shall be the sole expense to the owner or harborer custodian of said animal. <br />Section 8 10. Dangerous / Potentially Dangerous Dogs. <br />1. Incorporation of Statute. The provisions of M.S., Sections 347.50 through 347.565, inclusive, are hereby <br />adopted as the potentially dangerous and dangerous dog regulations for the City. Where a conflict exists <br />between the provisions of the City Ordinances, and the provisions of M.S., Sections 347.50 through <br />347.565, inclusive, the more restrictive provision shall apply. <br /> <br />2. Initial Determination. The City’s designated Animal Control Authority shall be responsible for initially <br />determining (“Initial Determination”) whether a dog is a potentially dangerous do g or a dangerous dog. The <br />Animal Control Authority may retain custody of a dog which has been initially determined to be a <br />dangerous dog pending the hearing as hereinafter provided. The Initial Determination shall be conclusive <br />unless the owner appeals the Initial Determination as herein after provided. <br /> <br />3. Notice of Initial Determination. The Notice of Initial Determination shall be personally served on the <br />owner of the dog or on a person of suitable age at the residence of such owner. The Notice of Initial <br />Determination shall describe the dog deemed to be potentially dangerous or dangerous; shall identify the <br />time, place and circumstances under which the dog was declared dangerous; shall identify the officer <br />making the Initial Determination; and shall inform the owner of the owner’s right to appeal the Initial <br />Determination within 14 days of the date of notice. The notice shall also inform the owner that compliance <br />with 7.4.1 and 7.4.3 of this Ordinance until the appeal is decided, and that all actual costs of care, keeping <br />and disposition of the dog are the responsibility of the owner. <br /> <br />4. Request of Hearing and Hearing. An owner may appeal the Initial Determination by filing a Request for <br />Hearing with the City Administrator within fourteen (14) days of the owner ’s receipt of the Notice of Initial <br />Determination. A hearing shall be held within fourteen (14) days after the City’s receipt of the Request for <br />Hearing. The City Administrator shall assign a Hearing Officer who shall not be the person who made the <br />Initial Determination. At the hearing, the Hearing Officer shall consider the reports and comments of the <br />Animal Control Authority, the testimony of any witnesses, witness statements, and the comments of the <br />owner of the dog. After considering all of the evidence submitted, the Hearing Officer shall make written <br />findings and shall determine whether the dog is a potentially dangerous dog or a dangerous dog (Final <br />Determination). The Hearing Officer shall apply the definitions of Section 2.3 in making a determinatio n, <br />but shall not declare a dog dangerous if the evidence at hearing shows it is more likely than not that the <br />threat, injury, or damage was sustained by a person: <br /> <br />1. Who was committing, at the time, a willful trespass or other tort upon the premises occupied by <br />the dog; or <br /> <br />2. Who was provoking, tormenting, abusing, or assaulting the dog or who has repeatedly, in the past, <br />provoked, tormented, abused or assaulted the dog; or <br />