Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ramsey County | Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan 92 <br />4.4 Completed Actions <br />Information to be input once finalized. <br />4.5 Cancelled Actions <br />Information to be input once finalized. <br />4.6 2025 Mitigation Strategy Elements <br />For all new and continuing actions, communities were asked to provide background information on the <br />action. Each action includes: <br />• Mitigation action name <br />• What is the problem the action is solving? <br />• How does the action solve the problem? <br />• Action status <br />• Hazards the action helps mitigate <br />• Plan goal(s) the action helps implement <br />• Lead and support agencies for each action <br />• Potential funding sources to support each action <br />• Benefits of implementing the action <br />• Estimated cost of the action <br />• Estimated timeline for the action <br />4.7 Action Prioritization <br />Communities were asked to score each action on a set of metrics. These metrics were: <br />• Potential for lives saved <br />• Potential for reduced property damages <br />• Potential for reduced response actions <br />• Whether the benefits of the action exceed the costs <br />• Internal community action priority ranking <br />Each metric was scored on a scale of 1 – 3, and the total scores were tallied up to identify a final priority <br />ranking. Final rankings were based on a minimum score of 5 and a maximum score of 15. <br />5 – 8 Low Priority <br />9 – 12 Medium Priority <br />13 – 15 High Priority <br />Once scoring was tallied, they were presented to the LPT and communities during the internal plan <br />review process, along with the invitation to review and edit scores and prioritization as warranted based <br />on specific community needs. Committee members were invited to review the scoring further during <br />the committee plan review period and provide any additional comments or concerns on action <br />prioritization; any comments received were reviewed and incorporated.