Laserfiche WebLink
City of Gem Lake Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 14, 2025 1 <br />City of Gem Lake <br />Planning Commission Meeting – January 14, 2025 <br />Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />Planning Commission Chair Don Cummings called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Commission Members Art <br />Pratt, Derek Wippich and Stephanie Farrell were present with one vacancy. Also present: City Planner Evan <br />Monson, City Attorney Kevin Beck, Acting City Clerk Melissa Lawrence, Councilmember Joshua Patrick, and <br />residents Isaac Nelson, Rich and Roberta Pientka, Dustin Marks and Sarah Ernhart. <br /> <br />January 14, 2025 <br />A motion was introduced by Commissioner Pratt to accept the agenda, seconded by Commissioner Wippich. Motion <br />carried 4-0. <br /> <br />Minutes <br />A motion was introduced by Commissioner Pratt, seconded by Commissioner Wippich to approve the November 12, <br />2024, Planning Commission Meeting minutes. Motion carried 4-0. <br /> <br />Public Hearings <br /> <br /> Special Home Occupation Request – 3907 Tessier Road <br />City Planner Evan Monson summarized the request for the special home occupation. The applicant is <br />proposing to use their detached garage as part of a home occupation. The plans submitted by the applicant <br />call for utilizing their existing detached garage as a home photo studio for a pet photography business; the <br />applicant currently runs the business out of a commercial space in Minneapolis. The applicant states in their <br />narrative that the driveway serving the detached garage can accommodate at least four cars, while the <br />‘main’ driveway on the property can accommodate five to six cars. Customers per day on-site vary; the <br />applicant anticipates at most four customers on-site in a day and having an average of two on-site <br />customers per week. Most sessions are scheduled for Saturdays between noon and 5pm, with occasional <br />appointments after 5pm. Home Occupations in the city are regulated by Ordinance 134. The ordinance <br />breaks home occupations into three tiers: occupations that require no license or permit, occupations that <br />require a license, and occupations that require a conditional use permit (CUP). Due to the applicant’s home <br />occupation having occasional on-site customers, the request requires a home occupation license. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pratt introduced a motion to open the public hearing at 7:07 p.m., seconded by <br />Commissioner Wippich. Motion carried 4-0. <br /> <br />Residents Rich and Roberta Pientka voiced their many concerns regarding this home occupation being <br />granted. Some of the concerns included the amount of traffic driving along the newer paved street down a <br />dead-end street. Applicant Sarah Ernhart shared that her property is located at the entrance of the street and <br />cars should not be having to drive down the whole length of the street. Another concern was regarding the <br />possibility of expanding into more than just photography of pets and adding grooming and the sale of pet <br />products. Ms. Ernhart shared that she has no interest in expanding into any other avenues and the <br />Commission stated if that was ever the case additional licenses would need to be obtained. <br /> <br />Ms. Ernhart shared that she has been doing pet photography for 20 years. Of the 60 to 80 sessions, she has <br />annually, roughly only 20 to 40 of them would take place on site at her property in Gem Lake. Most <br />photography sessions last between 30-60 minutes, and typically involve one or two dogs per client. There is <br />rarely any barking, and most dogs don’t make any noise at all. Most sessions are scheduled for Saturdays <br />between 12pm-5pm, although on occasion some clients need to come in the evenings, as late as 7pm. The <br />driveway leading to the detached garage can accommodate up to 4 vehicles, so there would be no on-street <br />parking. <br /> <br />City Planner Evan Monson assured the public that this request does fall within the ordinance regulations <br />and will limit the applicant on what it can do. No signs are allowed to be placed on the property based on <br />the current sign ordinance. <br />