My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
December 2011 Gem Lake Newsletter
GemLake
>
ADMINISTRATION
>
NEWSLETTERS
>
2011
>
December 2011 Gem Lake Newsletter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2025 10:58:24 AM
Creation date
11/19/2025 10:58:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 04500
Document
NEWSLETTER
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Gem Lake News Page 2 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Starting at the beginning, it is important to <br />note what is included in each budget <br />grouping. The total expenditure budget <br />comprises not only the expenses to run the <br />day-to-day operations of the city, but also <br />the Enterprise Fund, which covers the <br />expenses of the sewer; and the Debt <br />Service Fund, which services outstanding <br />bonds. These bonds cover two roadway <br />projects and the cost of Heritage Hall <br />construction. The total budget of $623,942 <br />is comprised of a $419,387 General Fund <br />Budget, a $151,790 Debt Service Budget <br />and a $52,765 Enterprise Fund Budget. <br /> <br />The General Fund Budget tends to get most <br />of the copy since it takes up the bulk of the <br />revenues and comprises the area where the <br />most discretion can be exercised. There are <br />four basic categories within the General <br />Fund Budget. These are General <br />Government, Public Safety, Public Works <br />and Transfers. The General Government <br />portion of the pie is $184,922, a decrease of <br />10.84% over 2011. This would make up <br />things like city clerk, city council, legal and <br />building expenses. The category of Public <br />Safety is made up of police, fire and animal <br />control costs. This portion of the General <br />Fund budget will increase 6.27% over 2011 <br />to $120,800, primarily due to increases in <br />contract costs. <br /> <br />The Public Works budget will decrease <br />18.27% to $53,655. This budget covers <br />things like street repairs and maintenance. <br />The ability to decrease this budget category <br />has resulted from various repairs and <br />maintenance being made in the past few <br />years to curbs, storm sewers and streets. <br />The last category within the General Fund <br />Budget is Transfers of $60,000 to other <br />budget categories. <br /> <br />The largest revenue source for the general <br />fund is property taxes. These revenues are <br />projected to decrease 17.1% in 2012, partly <br />because the City of Gem Lake is striving to <br />keep the general fund tax levy as low as <br />possible, and partly due to declining real <br />estate values. <br /> <br />The general fund tax lev y will be $222,172. <br />When combined with the debt service levy <br />2012 City Budget Approved (continued from page 1) <br /> <br /> <br />of $51,300, the total property tax levy <br />divided up among residents will be <br />$273,472. <br /> <br />Like most cities, Gem Lake lost 100% of <br />the Local Government Aid it received. <br />Also, the Market Value Homestead Credit <br />program has been eliminated in its old <br />form. Both changes resulted from budget <br />chaos on the state level in 2011.The city <br />has worked hard to cushion residents from <br />the impact of these losses by keeping its <br />budget as modest as possible, according <br />to Gem Lake Mayor Bob Uzpen, <br />particularly in light of the fact that the city's <br />tax capacity (the total value of real estate) <br />has decreased 7.22% over the past year. <br /> <br />Even with conservative budgeting, it is <br />possible that residents will see an <br />increase in their total tax bill, due to <br />increases in county and school budgets <br />and the elimination of the Market Value <br />Homestead Credit program in its old form. <br />There was a handout sent with the initial <br />tax statements from the county, which is <br />designed to explain some very <br />complicated changes and their potential <br />impacts on home owners. <br /> <br />Two important facts to keep in mind <br />according to the mayor: 1) The city's tax <br />rate has gone down about a percentage to <br />26.21%; and 2) the city gets only 21.68% <br />of the property taxes collected. The <br />remainder goes to Ramsey County <br />(50.49%), the School District (21.54%) <br />and other agencies, such as the local <br />watershed board (6.29%).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.