My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014 Vol. 8 Issue 3 June
GemLake
>
ADMINISTRATION
>
NEWSLETTERS
>
2014
>
2014 Vol. 8 Issue 3 June
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2025 8:49:11 AM
Creation date
11/26/2025 8:49:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 4500
Document
NEWSLETTER
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Gem Lake News Page 2 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Gem Lake’s recent business district study, which <br />is referenced on page one, included a survey of <br />Gem Lake residents, business owners, and those <br />owning land in the business district, in order to <br />obtain their thoughts on the present conditions, <br />and suggestions for development in the future. <br /> <br />Key survey results are summarized here: <br /> <br />Run down facilities, a negative business climate <br />and the lack of sewer and water are among the <br />factors keeping Gem Lake's business district from <br />thriving. This is according to the thirty four <br />responses to a recent survey of residents and <br />businesses in Gem Lake that was conducted as <br />part of business development study. <br /> <br />While the response number was too small to be <br />statistically accurate on all counts, Marc Putman <br />of Putman Design and Planning, who sent out the <br />survey, noted that respondents took a lot of time <br />to thoroughly respond. "Residents and land <br />owners who did return the forms, provided rather <br />complete responses, with written narratives of <br />observations, problems and solutions." <br /> <br />Almost all of the surveys return were filled out by <br />people who live in Gem Lake. (33 out of 34) Most <br />said they would do local shopping if more <br />services were available in Gem Lake. Currently, <br />50% of respondents said they shop locally, when <br />possible, but 79% said they would make a point <br />of it if the stores and services were there. <br /> <br />The general views of our business district were <br />somewhat brutal. Among the comments were the <br />following quotes: <br /> "A big problem is seeing unkempt back of <br />businesses." <br /> "It’s an ugly business district. Looks run <br />down." <br /> "The biggest problem is access." <br /> "The area is very fragmented, has no <br />focus, has no logic, and basically does <br />not serve the City of Gem Lake." <br /> <br /> (continued on page 3) <br />Development Study Survey Results Summarized <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Audit Completed for <br />2013 City Finances <br /> (continued from page 1) <br />According to Christopher Knopik, a Manager of <br />CliftonLarsonAllen, no difficulties were <br />encountered in performing the audit. “In fact, <br />management was most cooperative and <br />helpful. We found that personnel and records <br />were available.” <br /> <br />They also noted that city finances are in good <br />shape, with a healthy general fund balance in <br />reserve for city expenses. The Minnesota <br />Office of the State Auditor recommends that <br />cities have no less than five months of <br />operating income in reserve. Gem Lake is <br />more than on target here, having <br />approximately 15 months of operating funds in <br />the general fund. They also found that tax <br />revenues were consistent with the budget. <br />Outstanding debt also decreased in 2013, due <br />to the early calling of several city bonds. <br /> <br />Financial statements and the required State <br />Auditor Reporting forms were both submitted <br />to the applicable state agencies before the <br />June 30 deadline. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.