Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Gem Lake News Page 2 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />A public hearing was held on June 16 at Heritage <br />Hall to discuss the feasibility of putting municipal <br />water hook ups into the Hoffman’s Corner <br />business district area in Gem Lake. Any <br />interested parties were invited to attend and <br />express their questions and concerns about the <br />project. <br /> <br />The Gem Lake City Council was very pleased <br />that various members of the public were able to <br />attend and provide input. <br /> <br />The subject of the hearing was basically a <br />feasibility study that was conducted by Gem <br />Lake’s city engineers (Short Elliot and <br />Hendrickson or SEH) as to whether the project <br />could be done, and at what price. <br /> <br />Supplying municipal water to the Gem Lake <br />business district turned out to be not only <br />feasible, it is necessary to the area's long-term <br />growth and public safety, according to the study. <br />The study was authorized by the city council on <br />November 18 of last year and was meant to be a <br />first step in the process of deciding if and how a <br />municipal water project would get off the ground. <br /> <br />Most municipalities contemplating an expansion <br />of municipal services, such as water, begin the <br />process with a feasibility study. SEH began by <br />looking at Gem Lake's previous Water Study, <br />which was done in 2006. This earlier study <br />identified three options for where water would be <br />piped in from the City of White Bear, but <br />recommended the best site as County Road E, at <br />the railroad crossing. The County Road E option <br />was the recommended option in the 2006 study <br />due to its proximity to the initial anticipated <br />service area, Hoffman's Corner, and the city's <br />desire to use White Bear's city water, due to its <br />chemistry and make up. <br /> <br />Another recommendation in the current feasibility <br />study is to create an additional emergency <br />connection to the Gem Lake water system. This is <br />due to the fact that the initial system would be a <br />dead end main, supplying a limited area, rather <br />than a more conventional "looped" system. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Important Public Hearing Held on June 16 on <br />Water Project for Business District <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The total project cost, including the emergency <br />loop, is now estimated to be about $490,000. <br /> <br />Members of the public at the meeting on June <br />16 expressed views both in favor and against <br />the project. Those in favor felt the project <br />would make the area more prepared for future <br />development and would aid now in fire-fighting <br />capabilities. <br /> <br />Some property owners were concerned about <br />the assessments and payments as a possible <br />impact on their businesses. <br /> <br />After the public hearing was closed, the city <br />council voted to formally accept the feasibility <br />study and authorize the engineering firm to <br />prepare specifications and plans that would be <br />needed to put the project out for bids. <br /> <br />Plans and specifications for the project will be <br />discussed and voted on at the city council <br />meeting on July 21. <br /> <br />If all goes as planned, the council would <br />approve the project plans and advertise for <br />bids to do the construction project. It is thought <br />that the bids would be accepted in late August, <br />then an assessment hearing would be held, <br />probably in September. <br /> <br />Assessment amounts would take into account <br />the percentage of the serviced area that each <br />property owner has and independent <br />appraisals done by a third party as to how <br />much the improvement would add to the value <br />of that property. At the assessment hearing, <br />affected properties in the business district <br />would know the projected assessment for their <br />property, and be able to vocalize their opinion <br />on the cost versus benefit equation as it <br />pertains to their situation. <br /> <br />If all is still a go, construction would take plane <br />in the October and November and would <br />possibly go into next Spring. There are many <br />steps involved in bringing additional municipal <br />services to property owners, many of these <br />steps are required by state law. Your input will <br />be vital. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />