Laserfiche WebLink
City of Gem Lake Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 14, 2023 1 | Page <br /> <br />City of Gem Lake <br />Planning Commission Meeting – November 14, 2023 <br />Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />Planning Commission Chair Joshua Patrick called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Commission Members Art Pratt, <br />Stephanie Farrell and Don Cummings were present. Not present was Derek Wippich. Also present: City Planner <br />Evan Monson, City Attorney Kevin Beck and Acting City Clerk Melissa Lawrence. <br /> <br />November 14, 2023 <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Pratt to accept the agenda, seconded by Commissioner Farrell. Voice vote <br />taken, all voted yes, motion passes, agenda accepted. <br /> <br />Minutes <br />Commission Cummings requested that a section of the minutes on page 2 be edited to state that the City should be <br />concerned, not that he is only concerned about agricultural use in a residential area. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Pratt to approve the August 9, 2023, Planning Commission Meeting minutes <br />with the suggested changes, seconded by Commissioner Cummings. Voice vote taken, all voted yes, motion passes, <br />minutes are approved. <br /> <br />Public Hearings <br />None <br /> <br />Old Business <br /> <br /> Ordinance No. 45 Garbage and Refuse Discussion and Survey Results <br />City Planner Evan Monson gave the Commission an overview of the results from the Garbage Hauler <br />survey Acting City Clerk Melissa Lawrence sent out to all residents and business owners in Gem Lake. 206 <br />residential surveys and 24 commercial surveys were sent out. The city received 66 responses from <br />residences, and 11 responses from businesses. This equates to a response rate of 32% for resident surveys, <br />and 46% for commercial surveys. The survey asked respondents to answer the following questions: <br />name and address, their current hauler, satisfaction rating of their service (Extremely Satisfied, Somewhat <br />Satisfied, Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, and Extremely Dissatisfied), <br />approximate monthly cost, and whether the respondent thought the city should contract garbage hauling <br />services in the future. <br /> <br />Responses to the survey are attached in a memo and PowerPoint presentation from City Planner Evan <br />Monson. Per Mr. Monson, given the split in opinion, the commissioners may want to forward the <br />information to the City Council to see what direction the Council would like to move in with regards to <br />contracting for hauling services. The commission can review other changes to make to Ordinance 45 in the <br />meantime. Per Acing City Clerk Melissa Lawrence, the survey results discussion has already been added to <br />the City Council agenda for November 21, 2023. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cummings shared some topics he thinks the Commission should address in the current <br />ordinance which include language on the maximum size of containers allowed in the city, placement of <br />containers and the visibility/screening of the containers. <br /> <br />Commissioner Patrick would like to wait and see what the City Council suggests regarding the results of <br />the survey before the Commission takes a deep dive into the current ordinance. <br /> <br />The Commission will continue to look at the ordinance to discuss at a future meeting. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />